Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Saudi Arabia warns it will act against West's policy in Middle East

la situazione si sta facendo molto complessa...tra gli Usa che vogliono 
il disimpegno e l'Arabia Saudita che è sempre più irrequieta, mi 
dispiace per il povero Cameron che tenta in tutti i modi per mediare ma 
su cui piovono critiche pure dal suo stesso partito visto che gli danno 
del "disco rotto"...la sua "colpa" è certamente essere arrivato troppo 
in fretta al voto parlamentare e aver contribuito al fallimento 
dell'attacco militare, tuttavia la posizione politica ufficiale del 
governo non è mai cambiata, neppure ora che sono forti le pressioni da 
parte americana/obamiana di gettare la spugna...certo che se i Sauditi 
si mostrassero più dialoganti...non si può negare che lasciare fuori del 
tutto i vecchi apparati statali del regime siriano rischierebbe di 
rendere ingovernabile la Siria...Irak insegna... Intanto Putin muove le 
sue pedine...
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/10524721/Saudi-Arabia-warns-it-will-act-against-Wests-policy-in-Middle-East.html
 
 
Saudi Arabia warns it will act against West's policy in Middle East
Saudi Arabia's ambassador to London has claimed the country is 
determined to independently arm Syria rebels after rejecting the 
diplomatic tactics of its Western allies
 
Saudi Arabia has warned it has been forced to go its own way in foreign 
policy as its Western allies seek diplomatic solutions to the war in 
Syria and crisis with Iran.
Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to London said US-led diplomacy in the region 
was risking the stability of the Middle East.
Mohammed bin Nawaf bin Abdulaziz al-Saud said his country is determined 
to independently arm Syria rebels and could not stand idly by while 
thousands of children were being killed by Syria’s regime.
Despite almost a century of friendly ties with countries such as Britain 
and America, the oil rich monarchy can no longer follow its allies as 
they pursue diplomacy with its Middle Eastern enemies.
“We believe that many of the West’s policies on both Iran and Syria risk 
the stability and security of the Middle East,” he wrote in the New York 
Times. “The West has allowed one regime to survive and the other to 
continue its programme for uranium enrichment, with all the consequent 
dangers of weaponisation.”
 
The comments come as Syria opposition officials report that Western 
diplomats have privately said that next month’s peace talks may not lead 
to the removal of President Bashar al-Assad from power. At a summit of 
opposition backers in London last week, the opposition was told that the 
transistional arrangements must preserve key parts of the current regime.
“Our Western friends made it clear in London that Assad cannot be 
allowed to go now because they think chaos and an Islamist militant 
takeover would ensue,” said one senior member of the opposition said.
High level warnings from Saudi royals over the West’s betrayal of 
previously shared foreign policy goals have also included demands for 
the Gulf countries to have a seat at negotiations with Iran over its 
nuclear programme.
Prince Turki al-Faisal, a former head of Saudi intelligence, said Riyadh 
felt the US and its allies had worked behind its back to achieve a 
diplomatic accord with Iran.
“It is important for us to sit down at the same table,” he said. “We 
have been absent.”
Prince Turki added that the US had “given the impression” it would take 
actions against Syria but had subsequently not delivered.
Saudi Arabia still expects its allies to challenge the two regimes over 
the bloodshed in Syria but is finding that West is refused to take 
action, Prince Mohammad added. As a result Saudi Arabia would take its 
own approach to the conflict, and orchestrate its own financial and 
miltary strategy of support to the Syrian rebels.
“To do otherwise is to walk on by, while a humanitarian disaster and 
strategic failure continue to fester,” Prince Mohammad wrote.
Julian Barnes-Dacey, a Syria expert at the European Council for Foreign 
Relations, said the Saudi leadership viewed support for the Syrian 
rebels and overthrow of the Iranian-aligned Syrian regime as vital for 
its own security. “There is broad consensus on the need to push hard on 
Syria because they don’t want the Iranians to gain the upper hand,” he 
said. “Saudi Arabia is upping its game to help the rebels on the ground. 
This is not just empty talk but is an appeal to the West to stand 
alongside them as they look to change the end game.”
Nawaf Obaid, an advisor to Prince Mohammad, accused America of 
dishonesty late last month as Riyadh reacted furiously in the wake of 
the Geneva agreement with Iran to negotiate over nuclear weapons. “We 
were lied to, things were hidden from us,” he said. “The problem is not 
with the deal struck in Geneva, but how it was done.” Mr Obaid said the 
country was adopting a new “defence doctrine” that to pursue its foreign 
policy goals.
“Our strategic posture is moving from reactive to proactive, we have a 
new defence policy,” he said.
The American rush to embrace detente with Tehran resulted in a landmark 
interim deal last month that put the country’s nuclear programme on hold 
in return for some easing of sanctions.
Mohammad Javid, Iran’s foreign minister, has said the new diplomatic 
opening raise the prospect that the 30-year breach in diplomatic 
relations with Washington could be healed by talks.
The nervous Gulf states have warned that Iran remains a destructive 
force in the Middle East and will use a thaw as cover for its support 
for terrorist groups and militias across the region.


 
C' gente nervosa in giro.
 
Sono alleati della dittatura fanatico wahabbita, dei Saud, di Bin Laden, di 
Bandar Bush il capo di Al Queda.
Disposti a tutto per odio razzista.
 
Comincia a delinearsi uno scontro diretto tra le bande armate dei criminali 
Wahabbiti e truppe Francesi, ora anche truppe USA.  Come non fossero bastati 
Afghanistan e Irak come lezione.
 
L'ironia della storia si diverte a giocare scherzi da prete, allevare vipere 
e coccodrilli e' pericoloso.
Specialmente se qualcuno apre le reti come un idiota, e li manda nel 
mediterraneo.
 
L'imperatore tenta di mettere insieme le genti del suo impero, l'imperatore 
nero pensa solo alla cassa e ad allearsi con criminali.
Grandi imperi cosi' cadono, perche' vuoti dentro.
 
 
 

 la situazione si sta facendo molto complessa...
 
un protettorato de-facto che crede di essere una superpotenza... piu' che complessa, psichiatrica.

 Grandi imperi cosi' cadono, perche' vuoti dentro.
 
mah...che dire... :-) Ma poi paga continuare a dire sempre le medesime 
sciocchezze?


"il protettorato" ha il denaro per vanificare le pseudo-politiche della 
superpotenza...

Dai non fare lo gnomi. 
 
Le dichiarazioni dei Sud dicono chiaramente che la guerra in Siria la hanno voluta loro assieme agli "alleati" occidentali.
 
Quindi metti da parte la guerra civile. Trattasi di aggressione e.
 
Oramai gli yankee stanno mollano questo vomito di Regno del male.
Hersh ha distrutto la balla del gas a ghuta.
 
Game over amico o stai con la civiltà o con il regno del male.
 
E evidente che la guerra in Iraq e la stessa di Siria, stragi giornaliere, che continuano con i massacri di siti e cristiani.
 
 

 E evidente che la guerra in Iraq e la stessa di Siria, stragi giornaliere, che continuano con i massacri di siti e cristiani.
 
poi mi dirai cosa ci fanno in Siria la Russia, Hezbollah e gli iraniani, 
no, non credo che siano li per fare beneficienza con l'esercito della 
salvezza... :-)
Pensi di raccontarla a me? :-))