Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Mr.Bush...when will you change your mind again?

Mr. Bush and His 10 Ever-Changing Different Positions on Iraq
By: Michael Moore
Michael Moore
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Dear Mr. Bush,
I am so confused. Where exactly do you stand on the issue of Iraq? You, your
Dad, Rummy, Condi, Colin, and Wolfie -- you have all changed your minds so
many times, I am out of breath just trying to keep up with you!
Which of these 10 positions that you, your family and your cabinet have
taken over the years represents your CURRENT thinking:
1983-88: WE LOVE SADDAM. On December 19, 1983, Donald Rumsfeld was sent by
your dad and Mr. Reagan to go and have a friendly meeting with Saddam
Hussein, the dictator of Iraq. Rummy looked so happy in the picture. Just
twelve days after this visit, Saddam gassed thousands of Iranian troops.
Your dad and Rummy seemed pretty happy with the results because 'The Donald
R.' went back to have another chummy hang-out with Saddam's right-hand man,
Tariq Aziz, just four months later. All of this resulted in the U.S.
providing credits and loans to Iraq that enabled Saddam to buy billions of
dollars worth of weapons and chemical agents. The Washington Post reported
that your dad and Reagan let it be known to their Arab allies that the
Reagan/Bush administration wanted Iraq to win its war with Iran and anyone
who helped Saddam accomplish this was a friend of ours.
1990: WE HATE SADDAM. In 1990, when Saddam invaded Kuwait, your dad and his
defense secretary, Dick Cheney, decided they didn't like Saddam anymore so
they attacked Iraq and returned Kuwait to its rightful dictators.
1991: WE WANT SADDAM TO LIVE. After the war, your dad and Cheney and Colin
Powell told the Shiites to rise up against Saddam and we would support them.
So they rose up. But then we changed our minds. When the Shiites rose up
against Saddam, the Bush inner circle changed its mind and decided NOT to
help the Shiites. Thus, they were massacred by Saddam.
1998: WE WANT SADDAM TO DIE. In 1998, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others, as
part of the Project for the New American Century, wrote an open letter to
President Clinton insisting he invade and topple Saddam Hussein.
2000: WE DON'T BELIEVE IN WAR AND NATION BUILDING. Just three years later,
during your debate with Al Gore in the 2000 election, when asked by the
moderator Jim Lehrer where you stood when it came to using force for regime
change, you turned out to be a downright pacifist:
"I--I would take the use of force very seriously. I would be guarded in my
approach. I don't think we can be all things to all people in the world. I
think we've got to be very careful when we commit our troops. The vice
president [Al Gore] and I have a disagreement about the use of troops. He
believes in nation building. I--I would be very careful about using our
troops as nation builders. I believe the role of the military is to fight
and win war and, therefore, prevent war from happening in the first place.
And so I take my--I take my--my responsibility seriously." --October 3, 2000
2001 (early): WE DON'T BELIEVE SADDAM IS A THREAT. When you took office in
2001, you sent your Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and your National
Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, in front of the cameras to assure the
American people they need not worry about Saddam Hussein. Here is what they
said:
Powell: "We should constantly be reviewing our policies, constantly be
looking at those sanctions to make sure that they have directed that
purpose. That purpose is every bit as important now as it was 10 years ago
when we began it. And frankly, they have worked. He has not developed any
significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is
unable to project conventional power against his neighbors." --February 24,
2001
Rice: "But in terms of Saddam Hussein being there, let's remember that his
country is divided, in effect. He does not control the northern part of his
country. We are able to keep arms from him. His military forces have not
been rebuilt." --July 29, 2001
2001 (late): WE BELIEVE SADDAM IS GOING TO KILL US! Just a few months later,
in the hours and days after the 9/11 tragedy, you had no interest in going
after Osama bin Laden. You wanted only to bomb Iraq and kill Saddam and you
then told all of America we were under imminent threat because weapons of
mass destruction were coming our way. You led the American people to believe
that Saddam had something to do with Osama and 9/11. Without the UN's
sanction, you broke international law and invaded Iraq.
2003: WE DON'T BELIEVE SADDAM IS GOING TO KILL US. After no WMDs were found,
you changed your mind about why you said we needed to invade, coming up with
a brand new after-the-fact reason -- we started this war so we could have
regime change, liberate Iraq and give the Iraqis democracy!
2003: "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!" Yes, everyone saw you say it -- in costume, no
less!
2004: OOPS. MISSION NOT ACCOMPLISHED! Now you call the Iraq invasion a
"catastrophic success." That's what you called it this month. Over a
thousand U.S. soldiers have died, Iraq is in a state of total chaos where no
one is safe, and you have no clue how to get us out of there.
Mr. Bush, please tell us -- when will you change your mind again?
I know you hate the words "flip" and "flop," so I won't use them both on
you. In fact, I'll use just one: Flop. That is what you are. A huge,
colossal flop. The war is a flop, your advisors and the "intelligence" they
gave you is a flop, and now we are all a flop to the rest of the world.
Flop. Flop. Flop.
And you have the audacity to criticize John Kerry with what you call the
"many positions" he has taken on Iraq. By my count, he has taken only one:
He believed you. That was his position. You told him and the rest of
congress that Saddam had WMDs. So he - - and the vast majority of Americans,
even those who didn't vote for you -- believed you. You see, Americans, like
John Kerry, want to live in a country where they can believe their
president.
That was the one, single position John Kerry took. He didn't support the
war, he supported YOU. And YOU let him and this great country down. And that
is why tens of millions can't wait to get to the polls on Election Day -- to
remove a major, catastrophic flop from our dear, beloved White House -- to
stop all the flipping you and your men have done, flipping us and the rest
of the world off.
We can't take another minute of it.
Yours,
Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com
Original Link:
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?messageDate=2004-09-22

where no one is safe,
Puttanata :)
-Stefano

 *LOL*
#_Questa la includiamo nelle centurie dececeriane...e passero` il consiglio
a Moore di mettersi un paio di occhiali in gola, nelle orecchie e nelle
adenoidi !!!!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
gIANO

 Di certo l'idiota di Moore ha fatto la stessa identica cosa :)
#_prendi , incarta e porta a casa per il dopocena del nonno:
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/powell-no-wmd.htm
footage of Powell and Rice declaring that Iraq is not a threat.
Thanks for the video go to Information Clearinghouse and A-infos Radio
Project
Fatti controllare anche da un otorino, miss Golaprofonda !!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Giannozzo.

 footage of Powell and Rice declaring that Iraq is not a threat.
Fessacchitto! :)  Se riporti il link vedi anche di ricordarti che poi
possono andare a guardare quello che c'e' scritto :)
-----
This clip from John Pilger's documentary
-----
Opss... Chissa' perche' la fonte e' John Pilger :)
E chissa' perche' il video non funziona :)
-Stefano

 possono andare a guardare quello che c'e' scritto :)
#_Rimbambita e Orba!...Il filmato era scaduto e non era piu`a disposizione,
ma c'e`scritto esattamente quello che tu neghi riguardo la Condi...
(quoto)
"footage of Powell and *Rice* declaring that Iraq is not a threat"
cortometraggio di Powel e ***RICE***dichiaranti che l'Iraq non e'(o non
rappresenta) una minaccia.
G.   rrrr

ma c'e`scritto esattamente quello che tu neghi riguardo la Condi...
C'e' scritto che la fonte e' Pilger :)  Proprio quello che ho scritto io
:)
E c'e' scritto che Pilger non ha mai visto la Rice ma ha ricevuto un
"transcript" da un "lettore anonimo" :)
*LOL*
-Stefano

 -Stefano
Toh!...arincarta e porta al nonno anche questa.
(stessa pagina di sopra)
E POI IO TAGLIO IL TROLLAGGIO
(quoto)
Guest host John King asked Rice about the fact that Iraq had recently fired
on US planes enforcing the "no-fly zones" in Iraq. Rice craftily responds:
"Well, the president has made very clear that he considers Saddam Hussein to
be a threat to his neighbors, a threat to security in the region, in fact a
threat to international security more broadly."
Notice that she makes it clear that Bush is the one who considers Hussein a
threat.
****She doesn't say, "I consider..." or even, "We consider..."****
G.   rrrr

Guest host John King asked Rice about the fact that Iraq had recently
Sempre dallo stesso "transcript" inviato dallo stesso "lettore anonimo"
:)))
*LOL*
-Stefano

 >> *LOL*
Vedi d'anna'.......a dormi' insieme annonno,la mattina, che la sera devi
continua' a batte.
Usccc !
G.   rrrr

Vedi
Vedo vedo che non sai che pesci pigliare :)
*LOL*
Alla prossima figura di merda caro Giano :)
-Stefano

 Alla prossima figura di merda caro Giano :)
#_Solite parole, del solito bue, al solito asino.
G.   rrrr