Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Le meraviglie del paese arcobaleno

 
 
White Genocide in South Africa: A Holistic Analysis Adi May 21, 2013
Africans, Current Events, Demographics, Europeans, Family, Family Issues,
Ideology, Politics, Race, South Africa and Rhodesia, The West Print Page
plaasmoorde3 Previously, I reported on the excellent work of Afrikaans
singer Sunette Bridges in raising awareness regarding the genocide of the
Afrikaner in South Africa. Recently she wrote an overview of the brutal
attacks on white people in South Africa for the four-and-a-half-month
period from December 1, 2012, to April 18, 2013. In this article she also
notes that there was only one incident of white-on-black violence from
January 2012-January 2013 in South Africa, which the mainstream media
obviously didn’t hesitate to denounce as a “racist attack” in their
reports.1 The blatant inconsistency in reporting on white-on-black and
black-on-white crime is evident for all to see…or is it? Scripture teaches
us that unregenerate men are by nature deceivers and liars (Rom. 3:4; II
Pet. 3:5). Over the past few months, the reality of this scriptural truth
has evidently manifested itself in the words and actions of those servants
of the devil who go out of their way to deny the genocide of white people
in South Africa and throughout all of the West. Despite the excellent work
in documenting South African white genocide by Dr. Gregory Stanton, the
Research Professor in Genocide Studies and Prevention at George Mason
University,2 the deniers of the ongoing genocide are plentiful, including
such public figures as the rector of the local university in my hometown3
and one of the most influential Afrikaner journalists,4 among others. All
claims that a genocide of the Afrikaner is taking place are dismissed as
false right-wing propaganda. The purpose of this piece is to show how
destructive the slander from the left can be and to oppose their false
claims for truth’s sake and for the survival of our people. Despite
looking for better, even remotely solid arguments from the genocide
“sceptics,” I couldn’t find any, but simply because so many Afrikaners
(and many other Westerners as well) fall for their deceptions, I’m forced
to refute these mediocre objections. Believe it or not, the three main
objections against the reality of white genocide are 1) that whites aren’t
targeted by criminals out of racial hatred, 2) that nonwhites suffer just
as much under the lawlessness in a crime-ridden South Africa as whites do,
and 3) that whites are also murdered by other whites. The first two of
these claims are both blatantly false. If it weren’t obvious enough from
the “Kill the Boer” song, there are numerous examples of black-on-white
crime in South Africa where race itself was a motive,5 and even though the
government purposefully withholds information regarding the homicide rate
of different racial groups, other sources note that deliberate homicide
rates of whites in South Africa over the first couple of months this year
have been more than double that of nonwhites.6 Furthermore, it is
significant to note that in less than 7% of black-on-white farm attacks,
property was reported as stolen, while black-on-black murders in South
Africa are reportedly motivated by theft in 73% of the cases, and domestic
violence in another 24%. Another noteworthy fact is that 96% of all
black-on-white murders are accompanied by extreme humiliation and torture,
often committed in the presence of loved ones.7 In contrast with these
first two objections, the third objection is true at face value, yet
completely irrelevant. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that the
first two objections by the left are indeed true. Even if one were to
grant the truthfulness of all these claims, they would still be irrelevant
as objections against the existence of a white genocide in South Africa.
1) Even if all the murderers in South Africa were indeed “colorblind,” not
at all motivated by racial hatred, it still wouldn’t change the truth that
whites are being systematically massacred by blacks in Marxist South
Africa. The Boer people are in danger of perishing whether the cause is
racial murder or not. 2) Even if blacks might be massacring their own
people at a similar or even higher rate, it is false to assume that whites
necessarily are not suffering genocide. Given the Boers’ minority status
in South Africa, this fallacy is particularly awful. We are a small and
decreasing population; to be sceptical of our genocide, merely because
blacks murder each other too, would be madness. 3) Even if a second party
is involved in the massacre of a particular group of people, it does not
leave the first without guilt – and it most certainly doesn’t change the
fact that over 40,000 whites have been slaughtered by blacks in South
Africa since the fall of apartheid back in 1990,89 which certainly
outnumbers the white-on-white murder rate by a wide margin. The brutality
of these black murders and violent assaults on whites, white farmers in
particular, also points to the fact that these go beyond “normal” crimes –
undoubtedly having a motive of intimidation accompanying it. Nevertheless,
despite these non sequiturs, what is particularly noteworthy is the
absence of an objection from this list: no one would counter claims of
white genocide by arguing that blacks are also killed by whites. Beyond an
extremely small sample, there simply are no statistics to back up such an
objection. The only way in which white-on-white murders might approach the
breadth of black-on-white murders is if white abortions are included. The
ANC government has, by virtue of enacting the world’s most liberal
abortion law under Nelson Mandela in 1997,10 given its stamp of approval
to the genocide of white (and black) children in South Africa. It also
further encouraged genocide, indirectly, by legalizing homosexual marriage
in November 2006.11 Abortion and homosexuality laws have a genocidal
effect on all races in South Africa, yet the whites’ own participation in
genocidal suicide via abortion, homosexuality, and miscegenation in no way
denies that genocide is occurring under black-ruled and majority-black
South Africa. These laws alone would be sufficient proof of the approval
of white genocide by the South African government, but on top of this, its
leaders have also for many years publicly continued to encourage the
killing of white land owners in song and dance. Clearly answering the
objections to the occurrence of white genocide in South Africa isn’t
difficult by any means, but it is extremely necessary in our contemporary
context since the majority of white South Africans, the very victims of
the genocide, would deny that it is even taking place. They have been
completely brainwashed with leftist propaganda and are unable to think for
themselves. In fact, the official political opposition to the African
National Congress in South Africa is the Democratic Alliance, a party
which, although less vocally, also supports the disenfranchisement and
genocide of white Afrikaners, and probably more vocally supports the
destruction of the last remnants of Christianity. This party gets over 85%
of the Afrikaner vote at election time.12 When over 80% of Afrikaners
describe themselves as Christians yet at the same time vote for the
advancement of the kingdom of Satan in virtually every sphere, it really
does unfortunately render the epithet “Christian” meaningless. I’ve grown
accustomed to end every article about my people with a call to repentance,
but there really isn’t any other viable solution to our seemingly
insoluble problem (II Chron. 7:14).
White Genocide in South Africa: A Holistic Analysis
 
 
 
plaasmoorde3
 
Previously, I reported on the excellent work of Afrikaans singer Sunette
Bridges in raising awareness regarding the genocide of the Afrikaner in
South Africa. Recently she wrote an overview of the brutal attacks on
white people in South Africa for the four-and-a-half-month period from
December 1, 2012, to April 18, 2013. In this article she also notes that
there was only one incident of white-on-black violence from January
2012-January 2013 in South Africa, which the mainstream media obviously
didn’t hesitate to denounce as a “racist attack” in their reports.1 The
blatant inconsistency in reporting on white-on-black and black-on-white
crime is evident for all to see…or is it?
 
Scripture teaches us that unregenerate men are by nature deceivers and
liars (Rom. 3:4; II Pet. 3:5). Over the past few months, the reality of
this scriptural truth has evidently manifested itself in the words and
actions of those servants of the devil who go out of their way to deny the
genocide of white people in South Africa and throughout all of the West.
 
Despite the excellent work in documenting South African white genocide by
Dr. Gregory Stanton, the Research Professor in Genocide Studies and
Prevention at George Mason University,2 the deniers of the ongoing
genocide are plentiful, including such public figures as the rector of the
local university in my hometown3 and one of the most influential Afrikaner
journalists,4 among others. All claims that a genocide of the Afrikaner is
taking place are dismissed as false right-wing propaganda. The purpose of
this piece is to show how destructive the slander from the left can be and
to oppose their false claims for truth’s sake and for the survival of our
people. Despite looking for better, even remotely solid arguments from the
genocide “sceptics,” I couldn’t find any, but simply because so many
Afrikaners (and many other Westerners as well) fall for their deceptions,
I’m forced to refute these mediocre objections. Believe it or not, the
three main objections against the reality of white genocide are 1) that
whites aren’t targeted by criminals out of racial hatred, 2) that
nonwhites suffer just as much under the lawlessness in a crime-ridden
South Africa as whites do, and 3) that whites are also murdered by other
whites.
 
The first two of these claims are both blatantly false. If it weren’t
obvious enough from the “Kill the Boer” song, there are numerous examples
of black-on-white crime in South Africa where race itself was a motive,5
and even though the government purposefully withholds information
regarding the homicide rate of different racial groups, other sources note
that deliberate homicide rates of whites in South Africa over the first
couple of months this year have been more than double that of nonwhites.6
Furthermore, it is significant to note that in less than 7% of
black-on-white farm attacks, property was reported as stolen, while
black-on-black murders in South Africa are reportedly motivated by theft
in 73% of the cases, and domestic violence in another 24%. Another
noteworthy fact is that 96% of all black-on-white murders are accompanied
by extreme humiliation and torture, often committed in the presence of
loved ones.7 In contrast with these first two objections, the third
objection is true at face value, yet completely irrelevant. For the sake
of argument, let’s assume that the first two objections by the left are
indeed true. Even if one were to grant the truthfulness of all these
claims, they would still be irrelevant as objections against the existence
of a white genocide in South Africa.
 
1) Even if all the murderers in South Africa were indeed “colorblind,” not
at all motivated by racial hatred, it still wouldn’t change the truth that
whites are being systematically massacred by blacks in Marxist South
Africa. The Boer people are in danger of perishing whether the cause is
racial murder or not.
 
2) Even if blacks might be massacring their own people at a similar or
even higher rate, it is false to assume that whites necessarily are not
suffering genocide. Given the Boers’ minority status in South Africa, this
fallacy is particularly awful. We are a small and decreasing population;
to be sceptical of our genocide, merely because blacks murder each other
too, would be madness.
 
3) Even if a second party is involved in the massacre of a particular
group of people, it does not leave the first without guilt – and it most
certainly doesn’t change the fact that over 40,000 whites have been
slaughtered by blacks in South Africa since the fall of apartheid back in
1990,89 which certainly outnumbers the white-on-white murder rate by a
wide margin. The brutality of these black murders and violent assaults on
whites, white farmers in particular, also points to the fact that these go
beyond “normal” crimes – undoubtedly having a motive of intimidation
accompanying it.
 
Nevertheless, despite these non sequiturs, what is particularly noteworthy
is the absence of an objection from this list: no one would counter claims
of white genocide by arguing that blacks are also killed by whites. Beyond
an extremely small sample, there simply are no statistics to back up such
an objection.
 
The only way in which white-on-white murders might approach the breadth of
black-on-white murders is if white abortions are included. The ANC
government has, by virtue of enacting the world’s most liberal abortion
law under Nelson Mandela in 1997,10 given its stamp of approval to the
genocide of white (and black) children in South Africa. It also further
encouraged genocide, indirectly, by legalizing homosexual marriage in
November 2006.11 Abortion and homosexuality laws have a genocidal effect
on all races in South Africa, yet the whites’ own participation in
genocidal suicide via abortion, homosexuality, and miscegenation in no way
denies that genocide is occurring under black-ruled and majority-black
South Africa. These laws alone would be sufficient proof of the approval
of white genocide by the South African government, but on top of this, its
leaders have also for many years publicly continued to encourage the
killing of white land owners in song and dance.
 
Clearly answering the objections to the occurrence of white genocide in
South Africa isn’t difficult by any means, but it is extremely necessary
in our contemporary context since the majority of white South Africans,
the very victims of the genocide, would deny that it is even taking place.
They have been completely brainwashed with leftist propaganda and are
unable to think for themselves. In fact, the official political opposition
to the African National Congress in South Africa is the Democratic
Alliance, a party which, although less vocally, also supports the
disenfranchisement and genocide of white Afrikaners, and probably more
vocally supports the destruction of the last remnants of Christianity.
This party gets over 85% of the Afrikaner vote at election time.12 When
over 80% of Afrikaners describe themselves as Christians yet at the same
time vote for the advancement of the kingdom of Satan in virtually every
sphere, it really does unfortunately render the epithet “Christian”
meaningless. I’ve grown accustomed to end every article about my people
with a call to repentance, but there really isn’t any other viable
solution to our seemingly insoluble problem (II Chron. 7:14).
 
Più omicidi in sudafrica in due mesi che 30 anni in Irlanda.... bella roba
il sudafrica post Apartheid !!!! 
 
-- 
L'immigrazione uccide.....
 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it
 
 
 


 
Si ma non dirlo ai pussy idiots, sono col cervello talmente devastato che 
potrebbero denunciarti per antisemitismo.
 
Tutto quello che gli rimane, un rimorso.