Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: London calling

            Sono solo dei criminali
            16.000 poliziotti in strada, sembra la Siria
            Dopo la primavera araba una calda estate brit
            London burns; Tripoli calm
Imagine, if Libya was now in a position to drop arms to the "rebels" in 
London; Imagine, if Libya was in a position to send military trainers to the 
U.K., to teach the "rebels" in London; both France and Britain sent dozens 
of military "advisors" to Benghazi to train the Sarkozy "rebels."
Isn't it ironic that while the streets of Tripoli remain calm the streets of 
London, capital of one of the principle imperial powers involved in the 
Libya war of aggression, is raging with fire?
For the third day in a row, violent protests continue in London, and are 
spreading elsewhere -- Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester and Bristol --  
following the killing of a 29-year old man by police in what corporate media 
describe as "an ethnically diverse low income area."
In other words, someone from an area where both unemployment and heavy 
police action are high.
Instead of focusing on its own domestic woes, economically-challenged 
Britain is still involved in the Libyan war of conquest and oil. It's a war 
launched by the erratic French President Nicholas Sarkzoy, at the behest of 
his friend Bernard-Henri Levy, who believed it was a fashionable and "chic" 
war that would make France globally relevant again. Sarkozy didn't even 
inform his own foreign minister when he made the decision to invade Libya, 
allowing Levy to freelance as God and to determine matters of life and death 
in Libya.
Meanwhile, the United States, which now is also in the midst of the worst 
economic and financial crises in recent memory still stubbornly refuses to 
officially endorse the African Union peace plan. The plan, supported by 
almost every African country, calls for a cease-fire, negotiations for a 
constitution, and democratic elections involving all Libyan parties and 
citizens.
At the same time, the Sarkozy "rebels" in Benghazi are devouring each other. 
The Sarkozy "rebels" recently murdered Gen. Abdel Fattah Younes, their 
military commander. His bullet-riddled body was burned and tossed on the 
streets of Benghazi, together with the bodies of his two senior officers. 
Just today, the Sarkozy "rebels" dissolved their own government in Benghazi. 
Accusations and counter-accusations fly between the various "rebel" 
factions --including the al-Qaeda and Islamic Fighting Front groups-- with 
the supporters of Gen. Younes vowing to avenge his murder.
These are the so-called "Libyan democrats" who were about to win control 
from Washington of the $30 billion in Libyan assets frozen in the United 
States? These disparate groups are now evidently going their separate ways.
Yet, the "rebels'" anti-democratic credentials had previously been covered 
up by pliant media, including The New York Times, CNN and the BBC. These 
corporate media, cheerleaders for the NATO war, ignored the beheadings of 
Black Libyans and migrant workers from other African countries, by the 
rebels, and the ethnic cleansing of Black Libyans in Misurata,  as reported 
in The Wall Street Journal on June 21. There are reports of mass graves 
being bulldozed in Benghazi; they are not mentioned in The Times, CNN, or 
the BBC.
But propaganda can only cover up so much.
Ironically, the murder of Gen. Younes occurred the very day after the United 
Kingdom had foolishly "recognized" these killers of Black Libyans as the 
"legitimate" representatives of all Libya. The U.K. decision followed 
similar action by France, Italy and the United States.
Never mind that the majority of Libyans, who live in the Western part of the 
country, including the 1.5 million in Tripoli, gave no indication that they 
wanted the Sarkozy "rebels" to prevail. On the contrary, more than one 
million Libyans reportedly turned out in Tripoli to denounce the Sarkozy 
"rebels" and to support the government.
There might be a lesson that can be drawn from the mayhem in the streets of 
London, by the British leaders here; a cautionary tale against blatant 
meddling in the affairs of other sovereign states.
Imagine, if Libya was now in a position to drop arms to the "rebels" in 
London; France violated United Nations Resolution 1970 and dropped lethal 
arms by air on Western Libya, increasing the bloodshed there.
Imagine, if Libya was in a position to send military trainers to the U.K., 
to teach the "rebels" in London; both France and Britain sent dozens of 
military "advisors" to Benghazi to train the Sarkozy "rebels."
Imagine, if Libya was in a position to provide sanctuary to the "leaders" of 
the London "rebels" and to invite other countries and to create a "Contact 
Group" which met on a regular basis, to monitor the progress of the London 
"rebellion," and to pledge financing.
Imagine, if Libya was in a position to get the African Union to contribute 
fighter planes for an AU force that would start bombarding London, and No. 
10 Downing Street, in order to "protect British citizens" by the use of "any 
necessary means" authorized by the A.U.
Imagine, if pro-"rebel" hordes of journalists, from around the world, 
descended on London, and reported one-sided "news" only from the "rebels'" 
position; while ridiculing or casting doubt on statements coming from U.K. 
and London official sources, including Prime Minister David Cameron and the 
Police officials.
The lessons go beyond London.
The economies of the United States and Western Europe will struggle through 
financial woes and market instability for a long time; some countries will 
never recover their position in the world economy. Coupled with massive cuts 
in government services --including the police forces-- and cuts on social 
and welfare programs, to deal with budget deficits, there are bound to be 
more social upheavals.
Under such scenarios --and London is only the beginning-- it's preposterous 
for NATO to continue bombing Libya on behalf of a collapsing "rebellion" 
while the streets of one NATO member country, and possibly more, are 
consumed with fire.
The African Union plan offers a peaceful resolution to the Libyan conflict.

              16.000 poliziotti in strada, sembra la Siria
Il death toll mi sembra decisamente  minore delle tacche che si possono 
contare sul kalashnikov di Assad. Ma evidentemente è un dt più 
"attraente" (solo per una tristissa nicchia di mercato, s'intende).
-- 
Namib
"La force ne fait ni raison ni droit ; mais il est peut-être impossible 
de s'en passer, pour faire respecter le droit et la raison" (Saint-Just)

              16.000 poliziotti in strada, sembra la Siria
Il death toll di Cameron mi sembra però decisamente inferiore a quello 
di Assad. Ma evidentemente (sia pur solo per una tristissima & 
ridottissima nicchia di mercato) è il dt "britt" il più attraente. 
Misteri dell'autoipnomarketing.



Pare ci siano 360  morti tra le forze dell'ordine Siriane.
Per dei pacifici dimostranti mi risulta sia troppo.
In una sola imboscata a due autocarri dell'esercito ne hanno fatti fuori 19 
di militari, mentre i camion correvano sull'autostrada.
Ottima mira e un gran numero di mitragliatori anche di grosso calibro.
Pacifici dimostranti civili, ma basta con babbo natale per favore, 
svegliatevi che siete in banca rotta.
Se dessero armi e supporto militare ai dimostranti di Londra succederebbe lo 
stesso.

 "attraente" (solo per una tristissa nicchia di mercato, s'intende).
Bisogna vedere però se pure gli altri sparavano e chi gli ha fornito le armi
e quanti morti "vere" ci siano.
Ciao!

 Pare ci siano 360  morti tra le forze dell'ordine Siriane.
Povere bestie. Quanto mi dispiace.


 e quanti morti "vere" ci siano.
Per ora, solo Clitemnestra.



Hmm che caduta di stile.
Forse sei dominato da forti pregiudizzi etnici o sbaglio? 

 Forse sei dominato da forti pregiudizzi etnici o sbaglio?
Sono razzialmente prevenuto a favore di chi ammazza gli sgherri di 
Assad, lo confesso (e penso tu sia troppo ottimista, in questo senso; 
360? Magari!). Però mi pare che sia i sostenitori del boia sia gli 
aspiranti boia del boia siano siriani. E' un problema per il concetto 
dei "pregiudizzi" (hai dimenticato una "g"? :) etnici? :)



Sempre grave caduta du stile, partigianeria, poca obiettivita'.
Dovresti spiegare al pubblico come funzionano i meccanismi del tifo da 
stadio.
Causa il tifo da stadio.
Anche i crucchi usavano i tuoi termini nei confronti di altri umani, un 
tempo.

 poca obiettivita'.
Partigianeria, ricordi? Chi spara sulla sua gente lo preferisco appeso a 
testa in giù. Ci sarà un Piazzale Loreto, a Damasco o ad Hama, no?


 Per ora, solo Clitemnestra.
No, per ora solo "chitemmuort!"  (visto che t'inebria il sangue,
magari i ricordi ti rinsaviscono)
Ciao! 

 No, per ora solo "chitemmuort!"  (visto che t'inebria il sangue,
Quando capirai qualcosa, il settimo sigillo farà una brutta fine.



Da quando fai uso di Svicolin in compresse ?

 Da quando fai uso di Svicolin in compresse ?
"Tu? Co' cquer facciònio?" (cit.) Vada pure, buon uomo senza perché :)


 Quando capirai qualcosa, il settimo sigillo farà una brutta fine.
Continuare a dare dello scemo agli altri, non migliora la tua
condizione.
Sono i risultati che dicono chi capisce e chi no,...tu no
Ciao! 

 testa in giù. Ci sarà un Piazzale Loreto, a Damasco o ad Hama, no?
Per forza: la madonna di Loreto viene proprio da quelle parti.
PP

Povere bestie. 
bestie o meno, rendono il confronto con l'UK senza senso. Quando i rioters
ammazzeranno uno sbirro, potrai dire che Cameron è più buono di Assad se non
ne ammazza cento volte tanto. Ma finchè non arrivano a quel livello di criminalità,
il confronto è impossibile
-------------------------------------------------------------------	
uomo bianco parla con lingua biforcuta.
il Diamat è la spiegazione di tutte le cose

 Continuare a dare dello scemo agli altri
Ad "altro".
