Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Accordo di Ginevra

Salve a tutti,
ho letto una sintesi - molto breve - del famoso Accordo di Ginevra
siglato da personaggi israeliani e palestinesi un paio di giorni fa.
La mia impressione e' che i contenuti siano molto simili al piano
Barak che Arafat rifiuto'. Qualche esperto puo' dirmi se mi sbaglio o
meno, e di quanto mi sbaglio?
Grazie anticipato a chi rispondera'.

gradiremmo il link esatto, grazie
On 6 Dec 2003 01:52:32 -0800, 
obe...@virgilio.it
 (Massimiliano)
wrote:


 gradiremmo il link esatto, grazie
in italiano e in inglese, in 3 formati differenti ciascuno:
http://alexbr.interfree.it/israel/doc/ginevra.htm
AleX
ps: quota meglio, per favore.

 Grazie anticipato a chi rispondera'.
IMHO, l'accordo di Ginevra ha parecchi difetti
(per un'opinione critica, vedi
http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article2223.shtml
  )
ma tutto sommato e', per adesso, l'unica alternativa possibile.
E, cosa piu' importante, dimostra che C'E un'alternativa!
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/364218.html
Poll: Most Israelis and Palestinians support Geneva Accord 
By News Agencies
More than half of Israelis and Palestinians support
 an unofficial peace proposal that includes
 unprecedented compromises for both sides,
 according to a poll published Sunday. 
The Geneva Accord, worked out
 by former Israeli and
 Palestinian negotiators,
 calls for the formation of a
 Palestinian state in the West
 Bank and Gaza Strip, the
 return of Palestinian
 refugees to that state - but
 not to Israel - and the
 division of Jerusalem between
 the two states. 
Pollsters read a summary of the agreement to
 Israelis and Palestinians, and found that 53
 percent of the Israelis and almost 56 percent
 of the Palestinians support it. Almost 44
 percent of Israelis and 39 percent of
 Palestinians said they would oppose such a
 deal. 
The summary did not specifically include the
 fact that a hotly disputed site in the Old City
 of Jerusalem - where the Al Aqsa Mosque
 compound sits atop the ruins of the biblical
 Jewish Temples - would be under Palestinian
 sovereignty. Instead, it said, "Each side would
 govern its holy sites." 
There is considerable opposition in Israel to
 ceding the site, Judaism's holiest, in a peace
 arrangement. 
The poll covered 610 Israeli citizens by
 telephone, and 631 Palestinians, interviewed in
 person. The poll quoted a margin of error of
 four percentage points. 
"This poll is a timely reminder of the fact that
 majorities on both sides are prepared to
 embrace an agreement that meets their
 respective core aspirations and interests,"
 said Edward Djerejian, a former U.S. ambassador
 to Israel and Syria and director of the
 Texas-based Baker Institute for Public Policy,
 which conducted the poll together with the
 International Crisis Group in Washington,
 working for conflict prevention and
 resolution. 
The group of Israeli and Palestinian officials
 who worked out the deal in meetings over two
 years have been distributing it among their
 populations, hoping to win support. 
Israel's government has categorically rejected
 the plan, while the Palestinian Authority has
 shown some interest. 
Hamas officially rejects Geneva Accord 
Hamas on Sunday officially rejected the
 so-called Geneva Accord, saying the initiative
 was "suspect" and failed to present an
 optimistic future for the Palestinian people. 
Hamas denounced the plan, saying it intended to
 repress the Palestinian cause with an unfair
 solution that would restrict the Palestinian
 resistance movement. 
It said the Geneva accord would force the
 Palestinian people to offer historic
 concessions in all their political issues
 inside and outside the Palestinian territories
 - such as the right to return to Israeli
 territory. 
Hamas urged the Palestine Liberation
 Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian
 Authority as well as the Palestinian people to
 announce openly and frankly that they are
 rejecting the initiative and all its
 components. 
On Friday, thousands of Palestinians
 demonstrated in Gaza against the Geneva Accord,
 criticizing the plan for saying Palestinian
 refugees should be allowed to return to an
 independent Palestinian state on the West Bank
 and Gaza Strip, not to Israel proper.

 
http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article2223.shtml
  )
IMHO un link abbastanza poco imparziale
Grazie comunque.

 
http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article2223.shtml
  )
E questa sarebbe un'opinione critica? L'accordo di Ginevra viene liquidato
come eccessivamente filoisraeliano in cinque sprezzanti righe. Si puo'
anche essere critici verso l'accordo, ma almeno argomentare in maniera
dettagliata la propria critica ed esprimere le possibili modifiche...
Ciao,
  L.
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 IMHO un link abbastanza poco imparziale
Trovami un link "molto" imparziale, su questo conflitto :-/
GT

fanno molte piu' vittime).
Cosa che saprai dimostrare, vero? :)
*LOL*
-Stefano

 
Hai ragione. Motivo in piu' per cercare di tenersi calmi e ragionare.
Una cosa che mi chiedo - da ignorante della situazione - e' perche'
non si fa strada nella dirigenza palestinese l'idea di un'indipendenza
per gradi. So che il paragone e' poco calzante, ma all'Italia e alla
Germania ci sono voluti anni e la benevolenza di stti piu' forti prima
di compiere l'unificazione.
Comunque, se hai tempo mi piacerebeb sapere dove sono diversi
l'Accordo di Ginevra e quello di Taba.
Grazie e ciao