Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: mi ha risposto di nuovo il governo inglese

La discussione sulla petizione si farà lo stesso, anche se, conformemente alla farloccaggine della petizione, sarà solo una perdita di tempo.
 
Dear OMISSIS
 
You recently signed the petition “EU Referendum Rules triggering a 2nd EU Referendum”:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
 
The Petitions Committee has decided to schedule a House of Commons debate on this petition. The debate will take place on 5 September at 4.30pm in Westminster Hall, the second debating chamber of the House of Commons. The debate will be opened by Ian Blackford MP.
The Committee has decided that the huge number of people signing this petition means that it should be debated by MPs. The Petitions Committee would like to make clear that, in scheduling this debate, they are not supporting the call for a second referendum. The debate will allow MPs to put forward a range of views on behalf of their constituents. At the end of the debate, a Government Minister will respond to the points raised.
A debate in Westminster Hall does not have the power to change the law, and won’t end with the House of Commons deciding whether or not to have a second referendum. Moreover, the petition – which was opened on 25 May, well before the referendum – calls for the referendum rules to be changed. It is now too late for the rules to be changed retrospectively. It will be up to the Government to decide whether it wants to start the process of agreeing a new law for a second referendum.
The Petitions Committee is a cross-party group of MPs. It is independent from Government. You can find out more about the Committee on its website: 
http://www.parliament.uk/petitions-committee/role
 
Thanks,
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament


 
La discussione è "promessa" per ogni petizione che superi le 10.000 firme. Ed è l'unico effetto garantito.
 
P.s. Lo sapevi che la petizione in oggetto era stata lanciata da un brexiteer che dava per scontato la sconfitta del si?
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj 
 

 La discussione è "promessa" 
 
non l'hanno promessa, è stata fissata, c'è anche la data.


 
Nel senso che il regolamento delle petizioni al governo promette una discussione a quelle che superano le 100000 adesioni.
 
Per essere precisi promettono di prendere in considerazione la possibilità di fare una discussione.
 
"If the petition gets 100,000 signatures it will considered for debate in Parliament."
 
Attualmente ci sono quattro petizioni in attesa delle quali due schedulate.
 
1) Stop retrospective changes to the student loans agreement
132,419 signatures
Waiting for 49 days
Scheduled for debate on 18 July 2016
 
2) EU Referendum Rules triggering a 2nd EU Referendum
4,137,377 signatures
Waiting for 20 days
Scheduled for debate on 5 September 2016
 
3) Make it illegal for a company to require women to wear high heels at work
149,901 signatures
Waiting for 63 days
 
4) Urge the South Korean Government to end the brutal dog meat trade
100,627 signatures
Waiting for 3 days
 
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj

 Nel senso che il regolamento delle petizioni al governo promette 
 
e ti ripeto che c'è scritto che la discussione E' STATA GIA' FISSATA!


 
 
Ho descritto il metodo, ciccino caro. 
 
#ossantapolentachepazienzachecivuole
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj