Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Avnery. 'Kill a Hundred Turks and Rest…'

'Kill a Hundred Turks and Rest…' 
 
by Uri Avnery 
I was reminded this week of the old tale about a Jewish mother taking
leave of her son, who has been called up to serve in the czar's army
against the Turks. 
"Don't exert yourself too much," she admonishes him, "Kill a Turk and
rest. Kill another Turk and rest again…"
"But mother," he exclaims, "what if the Turk kills me?"
"Kills you?" she cries out. "Why? What have you done to him?"
This is not a joke (and this is not a week for jokes). It is a lesson in
psychology. I was reminded of it when I read Ehud Olmert's statement that
more than anything else he was furious about the outburst of joy in Gaza
after the attack in Jerusalem, in which eight yeshiva students were killed.
Before that, last weekend, the Israeli army killed 120 Palestinians in the
Gaza Strip, half of them civilians, among them dozens of children. That
was not "kill a Turk and rest." That was "kill a hundred Turks and rest."
But Olmert does not understand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Five-Day War in Gaza (as a Hamas leader called it) was but another
short chapter in the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. This bloody monster is
never satisfied; its appetite just grows with the eating.
This chapter started with the "targeted liquidation" of five senior
militants inside the Gaza Strip. The "response" was a salvo of rockets,
and this time not only on Sderot, but also on Ashkelon and Netivot. The
"response" to the "response" was the army's incursion and the wholesale
killing.
The stated aim was, as always, to stop the launching of the rockets. The
means: killing a maximum of Palestinians, in order to teach them a lesson.
The decision was based on the traditional Israeli concept: hit the
civilian population again and again, until it overthrows its leaders. This
has been tried hundreds of times and has failed hundreds of times.
As if an example for the folly of the propagators of this concept had been
lacking, it was provided on TV by ex-general Matan Vilnai, when he said
that the Palestinians are "bringing a shoah on themselves." The Hebrew
word shoah is known all over the world, where it has one clear meaning:
the Holocaust carried out by the Nazis against the Jews. Vilnai's
utterance spread like a brush fire throughout the Arab world and set off a
shock wave. I, too, received dozens of phone calls and e-mail messages
from all over the world. How to convince people that in day-to-day Hebrew
usage, shoah means "only" a great disaster, and that Gen. Vilnai, a former
candidate for chief of staff, is not the most intelligent of people?
Some years ago, President Bush called for a "crusade" against terrorism.
He had no idea that for hundreds of millions of Arabs, the word "crusade"
brings to mind one of the biggest crimes in human history, the appalling
massacre committed by the original crusaders against the Muslims (and
Jews) in the alleys of Jerusalem. In an intelligence contest between Bush
and Vilnai, the outcome, if any, would be in doubt.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vilnai does not understand what the word shoah means to others, and Olmert
does not understand why there is rejoicing in Gaza after the attack on the
yeshiva in Jerusalem. Wise men like these direct the state, the
government, and the army. Wise men like these control public opinion
through the media. What is common to all of them: blunted sensibilities to
the feelings of anybody who is not Jewish/Israeli. From this springs their
inability to understand the psychology of the other side, and hence the
consequences of their own words and actions.
This is also expressed in the inability to understand why the Hamas people
claimed victory in the Five-Day War. What victory? After all, only two
Israeli soldiers and one Israeli civilian were killed, as against 120
Palestinian dead, both fighters and civilians.
But this battle was fought between one of the strongest armies in the
world, equipped with the most modern arms on earth, and a few thousand
irregulars with primitive arms. If the battle ended in a draw – and such a
battle always ends in a draw – this is a great victory for the weak side.
In Lebanon War II and in the Gaza war.
(Benjamin Netanyahu made one of the most stupid statements this week, when
he demanded that "the Israeli army must move from attrition to decision."
In a struggle like this, there never is a decision.)
The real effect of such an operation is not expressed in material and
quantitative facts: so-and-so many dead, so-and-so many injured, so-and-so
much destroyed. It is expressed in psychological results that cannot be
measured, and therefore are inaccessible to the minds of generals: how
much hatred has been added to the seething pool, how many new potential
suicide bombers were produced, how many people vowed revenge and became
ticking bombs – like the Jerusalem youngster, who woke up one bright
morning this week, got himself a weapon, went to the Mercaz Harav yeshiva,
the mother of all settlements, and killed as many as he could.
Now the political and military leadership of Israel sits down to discuss
what to do, how to "respond." No new idea has come up or will come up,
because not one of these politicians and generals is able to bring up a
new idea. They can only go back to the hundred things they have already
done, and that have failed a hundred times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first step on the way out of this madness is the readiness to question
all our concepts and methods of the last 60 years and start thinking
again, right from the beginning.
That is always hard. That is even harder for us, because our leadership
has no freedom of thought – its thinking is very closely tied to the
thinking of the American leadership.
This week, a shocking document was published: David Rose's article in
Vanity Fair. It describes how U.S. officials have in recent years dictated
every single step of the Palestinian leadership, down to the most minute
detail. Though the article does not touch the Israeli-American
relationship (in itself a surprising omission), it goes without saying
that the American course, including the smallest items, is coordinated
with the Israeli government.
Why shocking? These things were already known, in general terms. In this
respect, that article held no surprises: 
The Americans ordered Mahmoud Abbas to hold parliamentary elections, in
order to present Bush as bringing democracy to the Middle East. 
Hamas won a surprise victory. 
The Americans imposed a boycott on the Palestinians, in order to nullify
the election results. 
Abbas diverted for a moment from the policy dictated to him and, under
Saudi auspices (and pressure), made an agreement with Hamas. 
The Americans put an end to this and compelled Abbas to turn over all
security services to Muhammad Dahlan, whom they had chosen for the role of
strongman in Palestine. 
The Americans provided plenty of money and arms to Dahlan, trained his
men, and ordered him to carry out a military coup against Hamas in the
Gaza Strip. 
The elected Hamas government forestalled the move and itself carried out
an armed counter-coup. 
All this was known before. What is new is that the mixture of news,
rumors, and intelligent guesses has now condensed into an authoritative,
well-substantiated report, based on official U.S. documents. It testifies
to the abysmal American ignorance, which trumps even Israeli ignorance, of
the internal Palestinian processes.
George Bush, Condoleezza Rice, the Zionist neocon Elliott Abrams, and the
assortment of American generals innocent of any knowledge are competing
with Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni, Ehud Barak, and our own assorted generals,
whose understanding reaches as far as the end of the gun barrels of their
tanks.
The Americans have in the meantime destroyed Dahlan by exposing him
publicly as their agent, on the lines of "he's a son-of-a-bitch, but he is
our son-of-a-bitch." This week Condoleezza dealt a mortal blow to Abbas,
too. He had announced in the morning that he was suspending the
(meaningless) peace negotiations with Israel, the very minimum he could do
in response to the Gaza atrocities. Rice, who received the news while she
was having breakfast in the exciting company of Livni, immediately called
Abbas and ordered him to cancel his announcement. Abbas gave in, thus
exposing himself to his people in all his nakedness.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Logic was not given to the people of Israel on Mount Sinai, but handed
down from Mount Olympus to the ancient Greeks. In spite of this drawback,
let us try to apply it.
What is our government trying to achieve in Gaza? It wants to topple Hamas
rule (and incidentally also put an end to the launching of rockets against
Israel).
It tried to achieve this by imposing a total blockade on the population,
hoping that they would rise up and overthrow Hamas. This failed. The
alternative course is to reoccupy the entire Strip. That would carry a
high price in lives of soldiers, perhaps more than the Israeli public is
ready to pay. Also, it will not help, because Hamas will return the moment
the Israeli troops withdraw. (In accordance with Mao Zedong's first rule
for guerrillas: "When the enemy advances, withdraw. When the enemy
withdraws, advance.")
The only result of the Five-Day War is the strengthening of Hamas and the
rallying of the Palestinian people behind it – not just in the Gaza Strip,
but in the West Bank and Jerusalem, too. Their victory celebration was
justified. The launching of rockets did not stop. The range of the rockets
is increasing.
But let us assume that this policy had succeeded and that Hamas had been
broken. What then? Abbas and Dahlan could return only on top of Israeli
tanks, as subcontractors of the occupation. No insurance company would
cover their lives. And if they did not come back, there would be chaos,
out of which extreme forces would emerge the like of which we cannot even
imagine.
Conclusion: Hamas is there. It cannot be ignored. We have to reach a
cease-fire with it. Not a sham offer of "if they stop shooting first, then
we will stop shooting." A cease-fire, like a tango, needs two
participants. It must come out of a detailed agreement that will include
the cessation of all hostilities, armed and otherwise, in all the
territories.
The cease-fire will not hold if it is not accompanied by speeded-up
negotiations for a long-term armistice (hudna) and peace. Such
negotiations cannot be held with Fatah and not Hamas, nor with Hamas and
not Fatah. Therefore, what is needed is a Palestinian government that
includes both movements. It must bring in personalities who enjoy the
confidence of the entire Palestinian people, such as Marwan Barghouti.
That is the very opposite of the present Israeli-American policy, which
forbids Abbas even to talk with Hamas. In all the Israeli leadership, as
in all the American leadership, there is no one who dares to spell this
out openly. Therefore, what has been is what will be.
We will kill a hundred Turks and rest. And from time to time, a Turk will
come and kill some of us.
Why, for God's sake? What have we done to them?
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
VOTATE LA SINISTRA L'ARCOBALENO
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 after the attack in Jerusalem, in which eight yeshiva students were killed.
eggià, "What have you done to him?"

 ah, ecco, quindi la pensavano così già prima di tornare in Israele....
Osservazione gratuita e totalmente infondata, giovanni.

 by Uri Avnery 
Si riconoscono i tipici argomenti da pirla.  Li quoto.