Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Ukraine: how far is it from Tallinn to NATO?

Ukraine: how far is it from Tallinn to NATO? 
19:32 | 14/ 11/ 2008 
 
 
MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti political commentator Andrei Fedyashin) - The sixth
NATO-Ukraine meeting took place in Tallinn on November 12-13 seemingly to
get a feel for Kiev's membership qualification progress. 
Such meetings have been held annually since 2002 (with the exception of
2007) in the form of consultations. But the last meeting was special.
Although its official agenda did not include Kiev's membership, or its
adopting NATO's Membership Action Plan (MAP), no one doubted that such a
discussion was inevitable. It was also not accidental that U.S. Defense
Secretary Robert Gates arrived at this semi-formal event sponsored by the
Estonian International Center for Defense Studies and the Defense
Ministry. 
In the first place, Gates was not planning to go - the event was not a
high priority meeting, but, as a Pentagon spokesman said, the August
crisis in Georgia induced him to demonstrate U.S. support for Ukraine and
other former Soviet republics wishing to integrate with the West. 
NATO's defense ministers do not have the authority to admit new members to
the bloc. This is the prerogative of the heads of state and government who
make their decisions based on NATO foreign minister recommendations. The
foreign ministers are expected to meet in Brussels in December to decide
whether or not to give Ukraine the go-ahead. 
The MAP is a sort of road map with assignments (army reform, weapons
inventory, compatible national legislation, administration reform, etc.)
whose fulfillment qualifies a country to face those sitting in judgment in
Brussels. All the decisions that follow are taken by consensus. And here
is the rub for Washington. It is trying to force Kiev's and Tbilisi's
membership at any meeting and against all odds. Tallinn was to give
recommendations to NATO's ministerial gathering in December. 
Gates' words "integrate with the West" are worth remembering. Gates used
them in an interview with journalists as soon as he arrived in Tallinn and
many times during and after the consultations - they were also a parting
shot when he flew off. He said that "Russia has no need to impede a
sovereign country to more fully integrate with the West. Doing so is not a
threat to Russian security." 
But it is known that Russia has never raised any obstacles to anyone's
integration with the West. On the other hand, it has never hidden its
opposition to the tightening of NATO's grip on its "southern underbelly"
by admitting Ukraine and Georgia. For Moscow, as for many others, NATO and
the West are not the same things as Gates is trying to make them out.
These tactical slips in propaganda are a common occurrence, but they are
primitive. The U.S. has never been particularly sophisticated in its
propaganda (the Pentagon is a glaring example) but when it begins to rush,
it gets in trouble. 
Now it is trying to rush Kiev into NATO, well aware that the prospects
will cool after Barack Obama is inaugurated next January. Obama has not
yet indicated in any way or anywhere his specific attitude to whether NATO
should speed up its march on Russia's Black Sea flank or not. 
The second reason for the haste is the presidential transitional period.
This period between two U.S. presidents is always a nervy time. All
administrations want to saddle the "successor" with their unfulfilled
obligations and plans. When these are signed and sealed, the person coming
in is essentially unable to ignore them. A presidential election in
Ukraine late in 2009 or early in 2010 is another factor adding to the
drive. That Yushchenko will be no more is obvious, but whether or not he
is succeeded by Yulia Tymoshenko is unclear. 
Judging by remarks from Obama's foreign policy experts, they advise him to
go slow on Ukraine's admission, but not to give an outright no. Putting
Ukraine or Georgia on a MAP in December 2008 is an almost impossible task,
believes Steven Pifer, a professor at Washington's Brookings Institution.
"Rather than pursuing a quest certain to end in diplomatic failure,
Washington needs Plan B. It should try to shape a December outcome that
sends positive signals to Kiev and Tbilisi while making it clear that NATO
does not concede Ukraine or Georgia to Russia's geopolitical orbit," he
said. 
In Tallinn it became clear that Ukraine and Georgia were now farther from
NATO than they were in Bucharest in April of this year, when pressured by
Germany and France, the NATO summit gave no green light either to Kiev or
Tbilisi. 
As a matter of fact, Russia need not set much store by the words either of
German Chancellor Angela Merkel or French President Nicolas Sarkozy that
neither Ukraine nor Georgia would join NATO in the foreseeable future, at
least not too soon. But not too soon is not never. No one is against the
admission of Ukraine or Georgia as such. The stumbling block lies
elsewhere. Europe does not want a Ukraine under Yushchenko or a Georgia
under Saakashvili in NATO. Mikheil Saakashvili's aggression in South
Ossetia has marred his chances of membership. Now that the facts are out
even Estonia's Defense Minister Jaak Aaviksoo told journalists: "We must
admit that trust in Tbilisi is at a low point. In the view of some
countries, Georgia is unpredictable." The Bush administration alone now
believes in a democratic Georgia. But in Georgia, if public opinion polls
are anything to go by, most of the population is at least not against
membership. 
The scene in Ukraine is more mixed. Even the NATO leadership realizes that
it will be the Yushchenko administration who will join the bloc and not
Ukraine in which 70% of the population are against this "fighting
partnership." The conflict among its leaders is fraught with unpredictable
results for the country, up to and including a split in the political
system and the state as a whole. Few like admitting a politically
incapable president, with a lame parliament and an over-ambitious premier,
with its permanent infighting and economic chaos. If you add to all this a
scandal over Ukrainian arms supplies to Sudan despite a UN embargo, then
even the most vocal Yushchenko supporters in NATO will be unlikely to
swallow this cocktail without getting a severe hangover. 
If Kiev and Tbilisi fail to start travelling towards a MAP in December,
they still may do so next April, when NATO's 60th anniversary summit will
be held in Strasbourg, France, and Khel, Germany. 
To be fair, it should be mentioned that the first to start hitching up
Kiev to NATO was Moscow's big-time ally Leonid Kravchuk, rather than
Viktor Yushchenko, followed by Leonid Kuchma. Right after the
Belovezhskaya Pushcha Pact, Ukraine joined the North Atlantic Cooperation
Council (now the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council). In 1994, Ukraine was
the first among CIS countries to sign NATO's Partnership for Peace
Program. In 1997, it concluded a Special Partnership Charter with NATO and
set up a NATO-Ukraine Commission. In 2002, it adopted a NATO-Ukraine
action plan. Yushchenko is following a well-trodden path. 
The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti. 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 wrote in message 
news:gfkg7p$pl7$1...@news.newsland.it...

#_Spero che l'espansione della NATO venga bloccata o saranno guai per tutta 
l'Europa.
G 

 G
sei in preda al delirio... :-))) 


quoto. basta non avere al governo politici fanatici e russofobi alla
pinter e la sua schiuma di fogna e latrina che lo supporta nel ng come
i vari nazipedobrit e rosapugnettari vari alla orso e magister pn...

 l'Europa.
impara a quotare, o meglio smettila di far il furbo per far passare la
merda del tuo camerata somarenko


Giano, rispondi con le pernacchie a questo servo dei fascisti del
likud?

 wrote in message 
news:b15e45a0-d437-433e...@d10g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

#_Senno'? 

Giano ha scritto:

Cominceranno a squillare citofoni.
Tb

 wrote in message 
news:gfslp0$2am$1...@news.motzarella.org...

#_..e se fosse il tuo? 

 #_..e se fosse il tuo? 
Io ho un buon firewall sul mio server.
Tb