Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: We can live with nuclear-armed Iran

Every effort should be made to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear
weapons, but, failing that, the world could live with a nuclear-armed
government in Teheran, a recently retired commander of US forces in
the Middle East said Monday.
John Abizaid, the retired Army general who headed Central Command for
nearly four years, said he was confident that if Iran should gain
nuclear arms, the United States could deter it from using them.
"Iran is not a suicide nation," he said. "I mean, they may have some
people in charge that don't appear to be rational, but I doubt that
the Iranians intend to attack us with a nuclear weapon."
The Iranians are aware, he said, that the United States has a far
superior military capability.
"I believe that we have the power to deter Iran, should it become
nuclear," he said, referring to the theory that Iran would not risk a
catastrophic retaliatory strike by using a nuclear weapon against the
United States.
"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said in remarks
at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank.
"Let's face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we've lived with
a nuclear China, and we're living with (other) nuclear powers as
well."
He stressed that he was expressing his personal opinion and that none
of his remarks were based on his previous experience with US
contingency plans for potential military action against Iran.
Abizaid stressed the dangers of allowing more nations to build nuclear
arsenals. And he said while it is likely that Iran will make a
technological breakthrough to obtain a nuclear bomb, "it's not
inevitable."
Iran says its nuclear program is strictly for energy resources, not to
build weapons.
Abizaid suggested military action to pre-empt Iran's nuclear ambitions
might not be the wisest course.
"War, in the state-to-state sense, in that part of the region would be
devastating for everybody, and we should avoid it - in my mind - to
every extent that we can," he said. "On the other hand, we can't allow
the Iranians to continue to push in ways that are injurious to our
vital interests."
He suggested that many in Iran - perhaps even some in the Teheran
government - are open to cooperating with the West. The thrust of his
remarks was a call for patience in dealing with Iran, which President
George W. Bush early in his first term labeled a member of the "axis
of evil" nations, along with North Korea and Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
He said there is a basis for hope that Iran, over time, will move away
from its current anti-Western positions.
Abizaid's comments appeared to represent a more accommodating and
hopeful stance toward Iran than prevails in the White House, which
speaks frequently of the threat posed by Iran's nuclear ambitions. The
Bush administration says it seeks a diplomatic solution to complaints
about Iran's alleged support for terrorism and its nuclear program,
amid persistent rumors of preparations for a US military strike.
Abizaid expressed confidence that the United States and the world
community can manage the Iran problem.
"I believe the United States, with our great military power, can
contain Iran _ that the United States can deliver clear messages to
the Iranians that makes it clear to them that while they may develop
one or two nuclear weapons, they'll never be able to compete with us
in our true military might and power," he said.
He described Iran's government as reckless, with ambitions to dominate
the Middle East.
"We need to press the international community as hard as we possibly
can, and the Iranians, to cease and desist on the development of a
nuclear weapon, and we should not preclude any option that we may have
to deal with it," he said. He then added his remark about finding ways
to live with a nuclear-armed Iran.
Abizaid made his remarks in response to questions from his audience
after delivering a talk about the major strategic challenges in the
Middle East and Central Asia, the region in which he commanded US
forces from July 2003 until February 2007, when he was replaced by
Adm. William Fallon.
The US severed diplomatic relations with Iran shortly after the 1979
storming of the US Embassy in Teheran. Although both nations have made
public and private attempts to improve relations, the Bush
administration labeled Iran part of its "axis of evil," and Iranian
leaders still refer to the United States as the Great Satan.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411429430&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
chissà perchè ci arriva persino un generale americano e non ci
arrivano i corifei della guerra inevitabile....

 arrivano i corifei della guerra inevitabile...
Quale guerra? Setback.
Tb
-- 
E' una grande mitzvah essere sempre felici (R. Nachman di Breslavia)