Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Aria vecchia negli USA

http://www.aipac.org/briefing/
"AIPAC has undertaken a massive effort to educate all congressional
candidates on the value of the U.S.-Israel relationship. Nearly every
candidate has met with AIPAC professional staff members and submitted a
position paper summarizing his or her views on U.S. policy toward the
Middle East.
http://www.counterpunch.org/frank05312005.html


PS:  Tanto per puntualizzare, non sono certo gli unici.   Tutte le piu'
grandi lobby della politica statunitense, dall'industria petrolifera a
quella farmaceutica, donano a tutti e due i partiti.
Con pochissime (veramente poche) eccezioni, la politica vera americana,
veti a risoluzioni Israeliane, guerra all'Iran, veto a Kyoto, etc., e'
fatta la'.  Non certo consultando la volonta' degli elettori.
GT

 fatta la'.  Non certo consultando la volonta' degli elettori.
Ho come l'impressione che tu stia rosicando.
Tb
-- 
:> [Tb] : Il dovere di un comunista sarebbe quello di formare un cordone
sanitario attorno alla feccia nazi
: [.sergio.] : No
Il mio blog: 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Ho come 
scio', negazionista di stragi israeliane.
-- 
[si parla della censura sulla strage israeliana di Beit Hanoun sul blog di
tonibaruch]
sergio: da perfetto goebbelsuccio quale sei, meglio non parlarne cosi'
nessuno la ricorderà
Tonibaruch :  Vero
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 scio', negazionista di stragi israeliane.
E di questo, almeno, ce l'hai un esempio?


 E 
scio', negazionista di stragi israeliane.


 scio', negazionista di stragi israeliane.
Ok, zero anche qui.
Che figura, somarello.


 Ok,
lo ammetti eh?


 lo ammetti eh?
Stavo appunto dicendo che sei a zero.
Il tuo cut disperato direi che conferma.
Ma se vuoi dimostrare le tue illazioni, vecchio onagro, io sono qui che ascolto.


 Stavo appunto dicendo 
ok lo ammetti. Grazie e ora scio' fascista ungherese


 ok 
Rotfl.
Allora sergetto, hai deciso di dimostrare in qualche modo i tuoi ragli o 
preferisci continuare a fare la figura del somaro?
Tb
-- 
[Tb] : Il dovere di un comunista sarebbe quello di formare un cordone
sanitario attorno alla feccia  [.sergio.] : No
[
http://snipurl.com/11r2l
]
Il mio blog: 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Rotfl.
smentiscimi goebbelsuccio,  posta questo articolo sul tuo blog : 
The Killing of Civilians in Beit Hanun is a War Crime 
Israeli artillery shells struck a residential neighborhood in Beit Hanun,
Gaza Strip, early Wednesday morning, killing 18 civilians, including 7
minors, and wounding some 40 others. The Israeli military contended that
the artillery fire was aimed at the place from which Qassam rockets were
fired at Ashkelon yesterday, an area about half a kilometer from where the
shells actually landed. The IDF said that human or technical error caused
the shells to strike the houses. The Minister of Defense has ordered an
investigation into the incident. 
Even according to the military, the shelling was not defensive; it was not
aimed at Palestinian fire or Qassam rocket-fire that was in progress. The
artillery was aimed at what the IDF refers to as a "launching space,"
i.e., an area from which the army believes that Qassams had previously
been fired. 
Shells fired from cannons several kilometers away are known and expected
to occasionally miss their target by a few hundred meters. For this
reason, it is especially likely that such weapons will harm civilians when
they are fired towards or near densely-populated residential areas.
Several such cases have occurred over the past year, and it was to be
expected that they could recur. 
Moreover, in April 2006, it was reported that the IDF reduced – from 300
meters to 100 meters – the "safety range" between populated areas in the
Gaza Strip and the areas targeted for artillery fire. Six human rights
organization, B'Tselem among them, warned about the great risk inherent in
the decision, contending it would lead to the injury of innocent
civilians. The organizations petitioned the High Court of Justice to order
the IDF to cancel the decision. The High Court has not yet ruled in the
matter. 
It is still unclear if the deaths this morning resulted from the inherent
inaccuracy of artillery or from technical or human error. However, massive
shelling towards a densely-populated area carries a high risk of civilian
casualties. Therefore, as discussed below, such shelling should be
avoided, unless there is no alternative in defending against attack. 
The principle of discrimination, one of the pillars of international
humanitarian law, requires that all parties to a conflict attack only
legitimate military objects. According to the principle of
proportionality, it is forbidden to launch an attack, even if aimed at a
legitimate military object, if the attack is expected to cause injury to
civilians that would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct
military advantage anticipated. These two principles lead to the
prohibition on using a means of warfare which, under the circumstances, is
likely to cause disproportionate injury to civilians. Launching of such
attacks is deemed a grave breach of international humanitarian law and a
war crime. 
The circumstances involved in the killing of the Palestinians in Beit
Hanun, including the fact that the attack was not a defensive action,
raise a grave concern that the shelling constitutes a war crime. The
Israeli military's contention that they did not mean to harm civilians is
meaningless, and cannot justify an action that amounts to a war crime. An
investigation conducted by military officials subject to the same chain of
command responsible for the action cannot serve as a substitute for a
criminal investigation. B'Tselem today wrote to the Israeli Judge Advocate
General, demanding that he immediately order a Military Police
investigation into the incident, with the objective of prosecuting those
responsible for the killings in Beit Hanun. 
