Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: vi ricordate l'affare Al Durra?

Una delle migliori performace della propaganda proPallestina. Ebrei
che uccidono un bambino. Ed ovviamente, era una balla.
 
If there was one event that made the Second Intifada more deadly  than
it might otherwise have been, it was the apparent shooting of Mohammed
Al Durrah (Al Dura/al Durah) on September 30th, 2000 that was filmed
by Arab cameraman Talal abu Rahmah on behalf of France 2 TV producer
Charles Enderlin. This was the few seconds of video that showed the
boy cowering with his father behind a barrel at the Nitzanim junction
in Gaza in a video and an image that have become infamous.
 
The accusation to this day surfaces constantly on the internet and
doubtless in Islamic media even though it has been conclusively shown
to have been impossible for Israeli soldiers to have shot the boy or
his father from their position.
 
In fact, it has never been proven that al Durrah was actually killed
(there was never a body produced).
 
If al Durrah was shot it has been conclusively shown to have been done
by Palestinians firing at the two from virtually point-blank range
behind the cameraman abu Rahmah.
 
The two were completely shielded from Israeli bullets by the barrel
behind which they were cowering and exposed to bullets from the
Palestinian position. However, even the boy’s death is disputed since
he is shown moving after he is supposedly killed and there is a strong
suspicion that the whole thing was a Pallywood production in which the
father had agreed to act due to a previous encounter with Hamas (and
this is where the latest news surfaces – see below).
 
Abu Rahmah was brought in to do the filming, and Enderlin was only too
happy to get the results and edit them for maximum effect.
 
France 2, Abu Rahma and Enderlin consistently denied faking the scene
by selectively filming then editing the few seconds of the action that
they showed. Their version is widely available on the Internet to this
day.
 
As more doubts about the events that day surfaced (even the IDF
accepted the initial reports), the father, Jamal al Durrah, paraded
scars he claimed were the results of the Israeli bullets that hit him
in an effort to persuade the public of his and the France2’s version
of events. In fact, he became something of a cause célèbre, trotted
out routinely at anti-Israeli events and in anti-Israeli media.
 
As it happened, an Israel orthopedic surgeon, Dr. David Yehuda of Tel
Hashomer Hospital became aware of these claims, and the case ran a
bell with him. When he checked his records, he found that he had
treated Jamal Al Durrah for wounds inflicted upon him by Hamas in 1994
when they suspected him of collaborating with Israel! The scars al
Durrah paraded were from the wounds inflicted by Hamas and the
subsequent surgery.
 
In fact, the suspicion has been raised that Jamal al Durrah agreed to
act in the Pallywood production to “repay his debt”, so to speak, to
Hamas, for his previous actions.
 
Jamal al Durrah then sued Dr. Yehuda and a French magazine that
published his story for libel in France in 2008. Of course, it is
rather unclear how a semi-illiterate Gazan could have done this. It
appears he was funded by an unknown source.
 
Dr. Yehuda vowed to fight back, and on Wednesday, February 15th 2012
the French Supreme Court acquitted him of slandering al Durrah.
Another of the lies has been exposed, and it is now even less clear
that either al-Durrah – son or father – was actually wounded or killed
that day.
 
Another brick has been torn down from the wall of lies, falsehoods,
edited film, and propaganda that has been erected around this patently
falsified event in order to demonize Israel. Nevertheless, until a
French court forces Enderlin to release the entire film clip, and
rules on the actual complaint that the footage was doctored to create
a false impression, this affair will continue to damage Israel’s
image.
 
 
---
http://cifwatch.com/2012/02/16/another-blow-against-propagandists-still-clinging-to-the-al-durrah-hoax/
 

 che uccidono un bambino. Ed ovviamente, era una balla.
 
ne hanno ammazzati 400 qualche anno dopo, per smentire quella balla

 democratico del MO.
 
la carne bruciata col fosforo non è molto commestibile.

 wrote:
 
qui c'era il post di un cretino che gioca con le leggende antisemite.
A cui lui crede, povera bestia.

 ne hanno ammazzati 400
 
ecco Bombacci che cambia discorso.


Ma tanto non hanno firmato convenzioni quindi lo possono usare.