Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: La lobby filo-Israeliana vuole un'altra guerra

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/24/AR2005122400636.html
Pro-Israel Group Criticizes White House Policy on Iran
At Issue Is New Stance on Tehran's Nuclear Program
By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 25, 2005; A09
After years of unwavering support for the Bush administration, the
powerful pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC has begun to sharply criticize
the White House over its handling of Iran's nuclear program.
In lengthy news releases and talking points circulated to supporters on
Capitol Hill, AIPAC describes the Bush administration's recent policy
decisions on Iran as "dangerous," "disturbing" and "inappropriate." One
background paper suggests that White House policies are actually
helping Iran -- a sworn enemy of the Jewish state -- to acquire nuclear
weapons.
The tough words from one of Washington's most well-connected and
influential lobbies come at a difficult time for President Bush, who
has been struggling with low poll numbers and growing public discontent
over the war in Iraq.
Bush raised AIPAC's concerns in a recent telephone conversation with
British Prime Minister Tony Blair when the two discussed Iran, U.S.
officials said.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has tussled with past
administrations -- Democratic and Republican -- but not with Bush, who
has staked his presidency on a vow to bring democracy to a region
dominated by Israel's enemies -- chiefly Iran, Iraq and Syria.
At issue for AIPAC is Bush's decision last month to hold off on pushing
to report Iran's nuclear case to the U.N. Security Council. The
president and Israel have favored reporting it for the past two years.
But with little support from other key U.S. allies, Bush reversed
course and endorsed a Russian offer that would allow Iran to conduct
some, but not all, of the nuclear work it says it needs for an
indigenous nuclear energy program.
Iran has not been receptive to the Russian offer. Iranian diplomats met
with their European counterparts in Vienna on Wednesday to discuss the
offer. Diplomats said there were no breakthroughs, but the parties
agreed to meet again in January.
If Iran accepts the terms, it would be allowed to produce unlimited
quantities of converted uranium. That material would be shipped to
Russia for enrichment and then returned to Iran to fuel a nuclear power
reactor.
In a statement to members of Congress, AIPAC said that it "is concerned
that the decision not to go to the Security Council, combined with the
U.S. decision to support the 'Russian proposal,' indicates a disturbing
shift in the Administration's policy on Iran and poses a danger to the
U.S. and our allies."
National security adviser Stephen J. Hadley said he hopes the plan "may
provide a way out" of a two-year crisis over a nuclear program that
Iran says is peaceful but was secretly built over 18 years.
Critics of the Russian plan, including some inside the administration,
argue that it would allow Iran to master a critical component that
could be diverted for atomic weapons work. Converted uranium, if
enriched to bomb-grade, can be used for the core of a nuclear device.
U.N. nuclear inspectors are on the third year of an investigation of
Iran's nuclear program. They have not found proof of a weapons program,
but mounting evidence suggests that the Iranians have spent the past
two decades acquiring the knowledge and technology that could be used
to build an atomic bomb.
"This decision will facilitate Iran's quest for nuclear weapons and
undermines international efforts to stop Iran from achieving such a
capability," AIPAC told supporters and policymakers in a paper
circulated after Thanksgiving. The position paper urged the Bush
administration to work quickly toward reporting Iran's case to the
Security Council, where it could face sanctions or an oil embargo.
AIPAC, which describes itself as nonpartisan, has criticized nearly
every administration's Middle East policies, often speaking out when
Israeli government officials express private frustration with U.S.
policies.
But the news releases mark the first major criticism of the Bush White
House and come as the administration is focused on problems in Iraq and
has no clear path on Iran.
At the same time, Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has become
increasingly hostile toward Israel. In October, two months after he
took office, Ahmadinejad said that Israel should be "wiped off the
map." Earlier this month, he told Iranians in a nationally televised
speech that the murder of 6 million Jews at the hands of the Nazis
during World War II is "a myth."
"AIPAC is taking the public statements seriously. They're alarmed by a
nuclear capability, and the administration appears to be adopting an
approach that isn't changing Iranian behavior," said Dennis Ross, a
U.S. envoy to the Middle East during the Clinton administration.
Ross said the criticisms, though serious, are unlikely to lead to an
all-out rift between AIPAC and the administration. "At the end of the
day, every administration does what it needs to do, but obviously they
will have to pay attention to this," he said.

weapons.
PS:  Ovviamente, la debolezza di Bush e la sua (quasi senza precedenza
nella politica USA) mancanza di obbedienza alla lobby Neocon e' dettata
da un'unico fattore:  La situazione in Iraq (la resistenza Irakena)
rende una nuova guerra in Iran estremamente difficile.
E questo suggerisce come, forse, una soluzione ai conflitti del
medio-oriente (primo fra tutti quello
fra Palestinesi e Israeliani) sia all'orizzonte da una direzione
completamente inaspettata.
Come ci hanno insegnato Lenin e Trotsky (e, dalle nostre parti, anche
il buon Palmiro Togliatti), non c'e nulla che induce al fermento
rivoluzionario come la consapevolezza di aver perso una guerra
scatenata dalla classe dirigente.
Se l'Iraq finira' in un disastro impossibile da nascondere alla
propaganda (oltremodo probabile),magari con tanto di depressione
scatenata dall'insolvenza fiscale del governo Bush (anche questo
possibilissimo), sara' un'occasione per far vedere alla popolazione USA
che i loro guai, i loro morti, le loro difficolta' sono puiramente e
unicamente attribuibili alle lobbies Neocon,
Militar-industriali,petrolifere, filo-Israeliane et similia.
Che c'e un legame fra la mancanza di soldi per New Orleans e per i
veterani, e
i 600 milioni che il congresso ha appena stanziato a Israele (
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/661833.html
 ) e i miliardi regalati
alla Halliburton.
E che, cosa piu' importante questi criminali Parassiti non sono
"organizzazioni" astratte,ma "umani" (beh, francamente criminali e
parassiti che hanno perso il diritto di essere considerati umani)  con
nome e un'indirizzo; e che e' possibilissimo (e doveroso) punirli e
toglierli cio' che loro hanno rubato al popolo Statunitense, o almeno
allontanarli dalle leve del potere.
E questo puo essere l'inizio di un radicale cambiamento nella Politica,
sia interna che estera, degli stati uniti che a sua volta portera' il
conflitto fra Palestinesi e Israeliani alla giusta conclusione via la
fine dell'appoggio incondizionato statunitense a Israele.
Non e' un'esito certo, ma possibile.  Almeno, questo IMHO e' l'unico
modo per risolvere la questione
medio-orientale in tempi brevi.   E le condizioni per un simile
riallinamento sono piu' favorevoli oggi che nel dopo-Vietnam, visto che
quest'ultimo era una guerra assai piu' "bipartisan" e senza un
colpevole ben indentificabile.
GT


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/24/AR2005122400636.html
te l'ho detto l'iran avrà l'atomica... Inoltre tra le elezioni mid term e le
nuove presidenziali la finestra per fare qualcosa si sta chiudendo in
fretta.


Giorgio Torrieri AKA Pat Buchanan
Palmiro Pangloss
-- 
Giuliano Ferrara for SISMI

 Giorgio Torrieri AKA Pat Buchanan
Effettivamente, se non fossi disgustato dal suo sostegno per la guerra
in Vietnam, per Nixon dirante Watergate,  per Reagan, e contro Martin
luther king, se non fossi nauseato dalle sue opinioni sul
multiculturalismo (toh! in linea con quelle di Tonibaruch e Giorgio
Israel), sull'immigrazione, sulla condizione delle donne,
sull'omosessualita', mi starebbe quasi simpatico :-/
GT

luno...@hotmail.com
 ha scritto:




santini secondo te lo adora?
-- 
 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 il buon Palmiro Togliatti),
Rotfl. Basta cosě. Ti prego.
Tb
-- 
L'EUROPA E GLI "EBREI BUONI"
http://tonibaruch.blogspot.com/2005/12/leuropa-e-gli-ebrei-buoni.html

 santini secondo te lo adora?
Io invece mi chiedo se il tuo progetto di dominazione panslava, sotto 
le mentite spoglie del comunismo,  rientra o meno nel  progetto di 
egemonia  giudaico-cristiana che va per la maggiore....
bwahahaha!
Am.

 egemonia  giudaico-cristiana che va per la maggiore....
Ne e' la variante ortodossa.


 coraggio di dire "ebrei"...
Sorry.    Non esiste nessunissima lobby Ebraica.    Esiste solo una
lobby di fascistelli Neocon e filo-Israeliani, e speriamo ancora per
poco.
GT

 Sorry.    Non esiste nessunissima lobby Ebraica.  
I tuoi compari rossobruni se ne avranno a male.
Non ti sei ancora emancipato abbastanza.
Lavora meglio sullo scaracchio antisemita. Con Lenni Brenner stavi 
andando bene.


baroon ha scritto:

Vai zio Ariellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll,
colpisci e torna a magnà montone fritto!