Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Bush andra' in guerra con l'Iran per proteggere Israele

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/696486.html
U.S. President George W. Bush said Monday he would use military force
to protect Israel from Iranian
threats, but also restated his desire to resolve the dispute over
Iran's nuclear program diplomatically.
"But now that I'm on Iran, the threat to Iran, of course - the threat
from Iran is, of course, their stated objective to destroy our strong
ally Israel. That's a threat, a serious threat. It's a threat to world
peace; it's a threat, in essence, to a strong alliance. I made it
clear, I'll make it clear again, that we will use military might to
protect our ally, Israel," Bush said.
------------------------------------------------
Incredibile.  Veramente incredibile.    Il bello e' che Bush sta
deliberatamente fomentando Antisemitismo con frasette come questa.
Dallo studio:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html
Maintaining US support for Israel's policies against the Palestinians
is essential as far as the Lobby is concerned, but its ambitions do not
stop there. It also wants America to help Israel remain the dominant
regional power. The Israeli government and pro-Israel groups in the
United States have worked together to shape the administration's
policy towards Iraq, Syria and Iran, as well as its grand scheme for
reordering the Middle East.
....
According to Philip Zelikow, a former member of the president's
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, the executive director of the 9/11
Commission, and now a counsellor to Condoleezza Rice, the 'real
threat' from Iraq was not a threat to the United States. The
'unstated threat' was the 'threat against Israel', Zelikow told
an audience at the University of Virginia in September 2002. 'The
American government,' he added, 'doesn't want to lean too hard on
it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell.'
On 16 August 2002, 11 days before Dick Cheney kicked off the campaign
for war with a hardline speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the
Washington Post reported that 'Israel is urging US officials not to
delay a military strike against Iraq's Saddam Hussein.' By this
point, according to Sharon, strategic co-ordination between Israel and
the US had reached 'unprecedented dimensions', and Israeli
intelligence officials had given Washington a variety of alarming
reports about Iraq's WMD programmes. As one retired Israeli general
later put it, 'Israeli intelligence was a full partner to the picture
presented by American and British intelligence regarding Iraq's
non-conventional capabilities.'
Israeli leaders were deeply distressed when Bush decided to seek
Security Council authorisation for war, and even more worried when
Saddam agreed to let UN inspectors back in. 'The campaign against
Saddam Hussein is a must,' Shimon Peres told reporters in September
2002. 'Inspections and inspectors are good for decent people, but
dishonest people can overcome easily inspections and inspectors.'
At the same time, Ehud Barak wrote a New York Times op-ed warning that
'the greatest risk now lies in inaction.' His predecessor as prime
minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, published a similar piece in the Wall
Street Journal, entitled: 'The Case for Toppling Saddam'. 'Today
nothing less than dismantling his regime will do,' he declared. 'I
believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of Israelis in supporting
a pre-emptive strike against Saddam's regime.' Or as Ha'aretz
reported in February 2003, 'the military and political leadership
yearns for war in Iraq.'
As Netanyahu suggested, however, the desire for war was not confined to
Israel's leaders. Apart from Kuwait, which Saddam invaded in 1990,
Israel was the only country in the world where both politicians and
public favoured war. As the journalist Gideon Levy observed at the
time, 'Israel is the only country in the West whose leaders support
the war unreservedly and where no alternative opinion is voiced.' In
fact, Israelis were so gung-ho that their allies in America told them
to damp down their rhetoric, or it would look as if the war would be
fought on Israel's behalf.
Within the US, the main driving force behind the war was a small band
of neo-conservatives, many with ties to Likud. But leaders of the
Lobby's major organisations lent their voices to the campaign. 'As
President Bush attempted to sell the . . . war in Iraq,' the Forward
reported, 'America's most important Jewish organisations rallied as
one to his defence. In statement after statement community leaders
stressed the need to rid the world of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of
mass destruction.' The editorial goes on to say that 'concern for
Israel's safety rightfully factored into the deliberations of the
main Jewish groups.'
-----------------------
Antisemitismo?  Col cazzo:
-----------------------
Although neo-conservatives and other Lobby leaders were eager to invade
Iraq, the broader American Jewish community was not. Just after the war
started, Samuel Freedman reported that 'a compilation of nationwide
opinion polls by the Pew Research Center shows that Jews are less
supportive of the Iraq war than the population at large, 52 per cent to
62 per cent.' Clearly, it would be wrong to blame the war in Iraq on
'Jewish influence'. Rather, it was due in large part to the
Lobby's influence, especially that of the neo-conservatives within
it.
---------------------------------------
Gli Ebrei Statunitensi sono in maggioranza contro Bush, contro la
guerra e contro la politica Israeliana, aldila' delle pretese di una
lobby fascista e criminale di rappresentarli.
GT

 lobby fascista e criminale di rappresentarli.
Gli unici idioti che diffondono l'equazione / neocon="gli ebrei" /, 
sono i cazzoni antisemiti del circo che frequenti.
Tra ebrei, americani o no, la sola idea di una lobby che rappresenta 
la totalità degli ebrei è risibile.
Anzi, emana quel distinto fetore che i tuoi colleghi di Montreal 
devono sopportare più di noi.
Tb

  bislacche, 
sei il pappagallo del panzone che dirige il foglio berluschino?
 
-- 
 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 sei il pappagallo del panzone che dirige il foglio berluschino?
Rotfl. Volevo vedere se qualcuno se ne accorgeva.
Non sei così scemo come sembri, allora. Ci fai.
C'è sotto Calderoli, vero?
Tb 

 sei il pap
Ma sparisci, ritirati, nasconditi merdaiuolo. Neanche capisci quel che
vien discusso. 


 Rotfl. Volevo vedere se qualcuno se ne accorgeva.
tsk metti ste scuse adesso, tonigoebbels? 
