Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Chomsky. The World's Most Wanted

The World's Most Wanted 
by Noam Chomsky 
TomDispatch  
On Feb. 13, Imad Moughniyeh, a senior commander of Hezbollah, was
assassinated in Damascus. "The world is a better place without this man in
it," State Department spokesperson Sean McCormack said: "one way or the
other he was brought to justice." Director of National Intelligence Mike
McConnell added that Moughniyeh has been "responsible for more deaths of
Americans and Israelis than any other terrorist with the exception of
Osama bin Laden." 
Joy was unconstrained in Israel too, as "one of the U.S. and Israel's most
wanted men" was brought to justice, the London Financial Times reported.
Under the heading, "A militant wanted the world over," an accompanying
story reported that he was "superseded on the most-wanted list by Osama
bin Laden" after 9/11 and so ranked only second among "the most wanted
militants in the world." 
The terminology is accurate enough, according to the rules of
Anglo-American discourse, which defines "the world" as the political class
in Washington and London (and whoever happens to agree with them on
specific matters). It is common, for example, to read that "the world"
fully supported George Bush when he ordered the bombing of Afghanistan.
That may be true of "the world," but hardly of the world, as revealed in
an international Gallup Poll after the bombing was announced. Global
support was slight. In Latin America, which has some experience with U.S.
behavior, support ranged from 2 percent in Mexico to 16 percent in Panama,
and that support was conditional upon the culprits being identified (they
still weren't eight months later, the FBI reported), and civilian targets
being spared (they were attacked at once). There was an overwhelming
preference in the world for diplomatic/judicial measures, rejected out of
hand by "the world." 
Following the Terror Trail 
In the present case, if "the world" were extended to the world, we might
find some other candidates for the honor of most hated arch-criminal. It
is instructive to ask why this might be true. 
The Financial Times reports that most of the charges against Moughniyeh
are unsubstantiated, but "one of the very few times when his involvement
can be ascertained with certainty [is in] the hijacking of a TWA plane in
1985 in which a U.S. Navy diver was killed." This was one of two terrorist
atrocities the led a poll of newspaper editors to select terrorism in the
Middle East as the top story of 1985; the other was the hijacking of the
passenger liner Achille Lauro, in which a crippled American, Leon
Klinghoffer, was brutally murdered,. That reflects the judgment of "the
world." It may be that the world saw matters somewhat differently. 
The Achille Lauro hijacking was a retaliation for the bombing of Tunis
ordered a week earlier by Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres. His air
force killed 75 Tunisians and Palestinians with smart bombs that tore them
to shreds, among other atrocities, as vividly reported from the scene by
the prominent Israeli journalist Amnon Kapeliouk. Washington cooperated by
failing to warn its ally Tunisia that the bombers were on the way, though
the Sixth Fleet and U.S. intelligence could not have been unaware of the
impending attack. Secretary of State George Shultz informed Israeli
Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir that Washington "had considerable sympathy
for the Israeli action," which he termed "a legitimate response" to
"terrorist attacks," to general approbation. A few days later, the UN
Security Council unanimously denounced the bombing as an "act of armed
aggression" (with the U.S. abstaining). "Aggression" is, of course, a far
more serious crime than international terrorism. But giving the United
States and Israel the benefit of the doubt, let us keep to the lesser
charge against their leadership. 
A few days after, Peres went to Washington to consult with the leading
international terrorist of the day, Ronald Reagan, who denounced "the evil
scourge of terrorism," again with general acclaim by "the world." 
The "terrorist attacks" that Shultz and Peres offered as the pretext for
the bombing of Tunis were the killings of three Israelis in Larnaca,
Cyprus. The killers, as Israel conceded, had nothing to do with Tunis,
though they might have had Syrian connections. Tunis was a preferable
target, however. It was defenseless, unlike Damascus. And there was an
extra pleasure: more exiled Palestinians could be killed there. 
The Larnaca killings, in turn, were regarded as retaliation by the
perpetrators: They were a response to regular Israeli hijackings in
international waters in which many victims were killed – and many more
kidnapped and sent to prisons in Israel, commonly to be held without
charge for long periods. The most notorious of these has been the secret
prison/torture chamber Facility 1391. A good deal can be learned about it
from the Israeli and foreign press. Such regular Israeli crimes are, of
course, known to editors of the national press in the U.S., and
occasionally receive some casual mention. 
Klinghoffer's murder was properly viewed with horror, and is very famous.
It was the topic of an acclaimed opera and a made-for-TV movie, as well as
much shocked commentary deploring the savagery of Palestinians –
"two-headed beasts" (Prime Minister Menachem Begin), "drugged roaches
scurrying around in a bottle" (Chief of Staff Raful Eitan), "like
grasshoppers compared to us," whose heads should be "smashed against the
boulders and walls" (Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir). Or more commonly just
Araboushim, the slang counterpart of "k*ke" or "n*gger." 
Thus, after a particularly depraved display of settler-military terror and
purposeful humiliation in the West Bank town of Halhul in December 1982,
which disgusted even Israeli hawks, the well-known military/political
analyst Yoram Peri wrote in dismay that one "task of the army today [is]
to demolish the rights of innocent people just because they are Araboushim
living in territories that God promised to us," a task that became far
more urgent, and was carried out with far more brutality, when the
Araboushim began to "raise their heads" a few years later. 
We can easily assess the sincerity of the sentiments expressed about the
Klinghoffer murder. It is only necessary to investigate the reaction to
comparable U.S.-backed Israeli crimes. Take, for example, the murder in
April 2002 of two crippled Palestinians, Kemal Zughayer and Jamal Rashid,
by Israeli forces rampaging through the refugee camp of Jenin in the West
Bank. Zughayer's crushed body and the remains of his wheelchair were found
by British reporters, along with the remains of the white flag he was
holding when he was shot dead while seeking to flee the Israeli tanks
which then drove over him, ripping his face in two and severing his arms
and legs. Jamal Rashid was crushed in his wheelchair when one of Israel's
huge U.S.-supplied Caterpillar bulldozers demolished his home in Jenin
with his family inside. The differential reaction, or rather non-reaction,
has become so routine and so easy to explain that no further commentary is
necessary. 
Car Bomb 
Plainly, the 1985 Tunis bombing was a vastly more severe terrorist crime
than the Achille Lauro hijacking, or the crime for which Moughniyeh's
"involvement can be ascertained with certainty" in the same year. But even
the Tunis bombing had competitors for the prize for worst terrorist
atrocity in the Mideast in the peak year of 1985. 
One challenger was a car-bombing in Beirut right outside a mosque, timed
to go off as worshippers were leaving Friday prayers. It killed 80 people
and wounded 256. Most of the dead were girls and women, who had been
leaving the mosque, though the ferocity of the blast "burned babies in
their beds," "killed a bride buying her trousseau," and "blew away three
children as they walked home from the mosque." It also "devastated the
main street of the densely populated" West Beirut suburb, reported Nora
Boustany three years later in the Washington Post. 
The intended target had been the Shi'ite cleric Sheikh Mohammad Hussein
Fadlallah, who escaped. The bombing was carried out by Reagan's CIA and
his Saudi allies, with Britain's help, and was specifically authorized by
CIA Director William Casey, according to Washington Post reporter Bob
Woodward's account in his book Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA,
1981-1987. Little is known beyond the bare facts, thanks to rigorous
adherence to the doctrine that we do not investigate our own crimes
(unless they become too prominent to suppress, and the inquiry can be
limited to some low-level "bad apples" who were naturally "out of
control"). 
"Terrorist Villagers" 
A third competitor for the 1985 Mideast terrorism prize was Prime Minister
Peres' "Iron Fist" operations in southern Lebanese territories then
occupied by Israel in violation of Security Council orders. The targets
were what the Israeli high command called "terrorist villagers." Peres'
crimes in this case sank to new depths of "calculated brutality and
arbitrary murder" in the words of a Western diplomat familiar with the
area, an assessment amply supported by direct coverage. They are, however,
of no interest to "the world" and therefore remain uninvestigated, in
accordance with the usual conventions. We might well ask whether these
crimes fall under international terrorism or the far more severe crime of
aggression, but let us again give the benefit of the doubt to Israel and
its backers in Washington and keep to the lesser charge. 
These are a few of the thoughts that might cross the minds of people
elsewhere in the world, even if not those of "the world," when considering
"one of the very few times" Imad Moughniyeh was clearly implicated in a
terrorist crime. 
The U.S. also accuses him of responsibility for devastating double suicide
truck-bomb attacks on U.S. Marine and French paratrooper barracks in
Lebanon in 1983, killing 241 Marines and 58 paratroopers, as well as a
prior attack on the U.S. embassy in Beirut, killing 63, a particularly
serious blow because of a meeting there of CIA officials at the time. 
The Financial Times has, however, attributed the attack on the Marine
barracks to Islamic Jihad, not Hezbollah. Fawaz Gerges, one of the leading
scholars on the jihadi movements and on Lebanon, has written that
responsibility was taken by an "unknown group called Islamic Jihad." A
voice speaking in classical Arabic called for all Americans to leave
Lebanon or face death. It has been claimed that Moughniyeh was the head of
Islamic Jihad at the time, but to my knowledge, evidence is sparse. 
The opinion of the world has not been sampled on the subject, but it is
possible that there might be some hesitancy about calling an attack on a
military base in a foreign country a "terrorist attack," particularly when
U.S. and French forces were carrying out heavy naval bombardments and air
strikes in Lebanon, and shortly after the U.S. provided decisive support
for the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, which killed some 20,000 people
and devastated the south, while leaving much of Beirut in ruins. It was
finally called off by President Reagan when international protest became
too intense to ignore after the Sabra-Shatila massacres. 
In the United States, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon is regularly
described as a reaction to Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
terrorist attacks on northern Israel from their Lebanese bases, making our
crucial contribution to these major war crimes understandable. In the real
world, the Lebanese border area had been quiet for a year, apart from
repeated Israeli attacks, many of them murderous, in an effort to elicit
some PLO response that could be used as a pretext for the already planned
invasion. Its actual purpose was not concealed at the time by Israeli
commentators and leaders: to safeguard the Israeli takeover of the
occupied West Bank. It is of some interest that the sole serious error in
Jimmy Carter's book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid is the repetition of
this propaganda concoction about PLO attacks from Lebanon being the motive
for the Israeli invasion. The book was bitterly attacked, and desperate
efforts were made to find some phrase that could be misinterpreted, but
this glaring error – the only one – was ignored. Reasonably, since it
satisfies the criterion of adhering to useful doctrinal fabrications. 
Killing Without Intent 
Another allegation is that Moughniyeh "masterminded" the bombing of
Israel's embassy in Buenos Aires on March 17, 1992, killing 29 people, in
response, as the Financial Times put it, to Israel's "assassination of
former Hezbollah leader Abbas al-Mussawi in an air attack in southern
Lebanon." About the assassination, there is no need for evidence: Israel
proudly took credit for it. The world might have some interest in the rest
of the story. Mussawi was murdered with a U.S.-supplied helicopter, well
north of Israel's illegal "security zone" in southern Lebanon. He was on
his way to Sidon from the village of Jibshit, where he had spoken at the
memorial for another imam murdered by Israeli forces. The helicopter
attack also killed his wife and 5-year-old child. Israel then employed
U.S.-supplied helicopters to attack a car bringing survivors of the first
attack to a hospital. 
After the murder of the family, Hezbollah "changed the rules of the game,"
Prime Minister Rabin informed the Israeli Knesset. Previously, no rockets
had been launched at Israel. Until then, the rules of the game had been
that Israel could launch murderous attacks anywhere in Lebanon at will,
and Hezbollah would respond only within Israeli-occupied Lebanese
territory. 
After the murder of its leader (and his family), Hezbollah began to
respond to Israeli crimes in Lebanon by rocketing northern Israel. The
latter is, of course, intolerable terror, so Rabin launched an invasion
that drove some 500,000 people out of their homes and killed well over
100. The merciless Israeli attacks reached as far as northern Lebanon. 
In the south, 80 percent of the city of Tyre fled and Nabatiye was left a
"ghost town," Jibshit was about 70 percent destroyed according to an
Israeli army spokesperson, who explained that the intent was "to destroy
the village completely because of its importance to the Shi'ite population
of southern Lebanon." The goal was "to wipe the villages from the face of
the earth and sow destruction around them," as a senior officer of the
Israeli northern command described the operation. 
Jibshit may have been a particular target because it was the home of
Sheikh Abdul Karim Obeid, kidnapped and brought to Israel several years
earlier. Obeid's home "received a direct hit from a missile," British
journalist Robert Fisk reported, "although the Israelis were presumably
gunning for his wife and three children." Those who had not escaped hid in
terror, wrote Mark Nicholson in the Financial Times, "because any visible
movement inside or outside their houses is likely to attract the attention
of Israeli artillery spotters, who … were pounding their shells repeatedly
and devastatingly into selected targets." Artillery shells were hitting
some villages at a rate of more than 10 rounds a minute at times. 
All of this received the firm support of President Bill Clinton, who
understood the need to instruct the Araboushim sternly on the "rules of
the game." And Rabin emerged as another grand hero and man of peace, so
different from the two-legged beasts, grasshoppers, and drugged roaches. 
This is only a small sample of facts that the world might find of interest
in connection with the alleged responsibility of Moughniyeh for the
retaliatory terrorist act in Buenos Aires. 
Other charges are that Moughniyeh helped prepare Hezbollah defenses
against the 2006 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, evidently an intolerable
terrorist crime by the standards of "the world," which understands that
the United States and its clients must face no impediments in their just
terror and aggression. 
The more vulgar apologists for U.S. and Israeli crimes solemnly explain
that, while Arabs purposely kill people, the U.S. and Israel, being
democratic societies, do not intend to do so. Their killings are just
accidental ones, hence not at the level of moral depravity of their
adversaries. That was, for example, the stand of Israel's High Court when
it recently authorized severe collective punishment of the people of Gaza
by depriving them of electricity (hence water, sewage disposal, and other
such basics of civilized life). 
The same line of defense is common with regard to some of Washington's
past peccadilloes, like the destruction in 1998 of the al-Shifa
pharmaceutical plant in Sudan. The attack apparently led to the deaths of
tens of thousands of people, but without intent to kill them, hence not a
crime on the order of intentional killing – so we are instructed by
moralists who consistently suppress the response that had already been
given to these vulgar efforts at self-justification. 
To repeat once again, we can distinguish three categories of crimes:
murder with intent, accidental killing, and murder with foreknowledge but
without specific intent. Israeli and U.S. atrocities typically fall into
the third category. Thus, when Israel destroys Gaza's power supply or sets
up barriers to travel in the West Bank, it does not specifically intend to
murder the particular people who will die from polluted water or in
ambulances that cannot reach hospitals. And when Bill Clinton ordered the
bombing of the al-Shifa plant, it was obvious that it would lead to a
humanitarian catastrophe. Human Rights Watch immediately informed him of
this, providing details; nevertheless, he and his advisers did not intend
to kill specific people among those who would inevitably die when half the
pharmaceutical supplies were destroyed in a poor African country that
could not replenish them. 
Rather, they and their apologists regarded Africans much as we do the ants
we crush while walking down a street. We are aware that it is likely to
happen (if we bother to think about it), but we do not intend to kill them
because they are not worthy of such consideration. Needless to say,
comparable attacks by Araboushim in areas inhabited by human beings would
be regarded rather differently. 
If, for a moment, we can adopt the perspective of the world, we might ask
which criminals are "wanted the world over." 
Noam Chomsky is the author of numerous best-selling political works. His
latest books are Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on
Democracy and What We Say Goes, a conversation book with David Barsamian,
both in the American Empire Project series at Metropolitan Books. The
Essential Chomsky (edited by Anthony Arnove), a collection of his writings
on politics and on language from the 1950s to the present, has just been
published by the New Press.
Copyright 2008 Noam Chomsky 
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 by Noam Chomsky 
ROTFL
Tb
-- 
Libertà per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,
Basel Hurani, 'Abd al-Halim Rumieh, Ratib Sha'bu, and Doha 'Ashur
al-'Askari 
http://snipurl.com/1oqtm

 ROTFL
questa è la migliore prova che la merduccia tonibaruch, goebbelsuccio
crocefrecciata e nostalgica del craxismo ,non sa come rispondere con
argomenti veri. Vedi anche i suoi reply agli articoli della Morgantini.

 Israeli northern command described the operation. 
"wipe from"? dove ho già sentito 'sto verbo? ...Presto! Mandiamo l'AIEA in
Israele!! Presto riemipamo i giornali di pericolo nucleare israeliano!!!
-- 


 questa è la migliore prova 
Quoto, camerata.
L' ilarità spontanea e contagiosa che suscitano i lappanazi e i nazi 
innamorati di chomsky vale più di mille parole.


 Quoto,
è talmente evidente...

 crocefrecciata 
A proposito, come mai avevi rapporti privati e di lappazione con 
l'agitatore di un giornale finanziato dalle croci frecciate?
Mi sembra una domanda semplice, camerata.


 l'agitatore di un giornale finanziato dalle croci frecciate?
mi confondi con i tuoi parenti ungheresi, goebbels del likud

 mi confondi 
Tu sei il camerata sergio lapparella, vero?
Quello che ricopriva di saliva le palle di un certo Naccarella.
Ti rinnovo la domanda. Come mai ti sentivi in privato, ti scambiavi 
informazioni di viaggio, e lappavi a tutto spiano un agitatore di un 
giornale finanziato dalle croci frecciate?
Tb
-- 
Libertą per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


 Quello che ricopriva di saliva le palle di un certo Naccarella.
no, quello poteva essere tuo padre. Controlla.
The World's Most Wanted 
by Noam Chomsky 



Following the Terror Trail 









Car Bomb 



"Terrorist Villagers" 






Killing Without Intent 














Copyright 2008 Noam Chomsky 
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 


 no
IMHO quest'affermazione non è credibile, camerata.
Vedo che non vuoi spiegarci come mai fossi in rapporti di dazione 
salivare con un agitatore di un giornale finanziato dalle croci frecciate.
Veniamo a cose più fresche: come mai su ICS intervieni contro chi 
contesta artamano in un thread dove si diffondono orride calunnie 
antisemite?
Tb
-- 
Libertà per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


 antisemite?
sei poco credibile quando ricopri di saliva le palle del razzista e
fascista arduino

 sei poco credibile 
IMHO è molto provabile, invece.
C'è un thread di qualche giorno fa, con artamano che diffonde un MB di 
calunnie antisemite. Io che dico che né lui né arduino conoscono il Talmud.
E tu che scalpiti e lappi dando man forte ad artamano.
Anche artamano ama postare Uomo Libero.
Puoi spiegare questo fatto, camerata?


 E tu che scalpiti e lappi dando man forte ad artamano.
in cosa? dove do ragione ad artamano, goebbelsuccio?
Su quota pure, senza taroccare come fai sempre.
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm


 sei poco credibile
Allora, c'è un thread ICS intitolato  "ebrei, su internet c'è un'altra 
lista nera".
Artamano sostiene... un mega di calunnie antisemite.
Io dico che lui non conosce il Talmud.
Tu, nel tuo usuale ruolo di soccorritore di nazi, intervieni di punto in 
bianco insultando.
Ma non arty. Chi lo smentisce.
Ora, a parte la curiosità di sapere come mai tu intervenga a favore di 
chi diffonde calunnie antisemite, vorrei sapere come mai, da quando 
esiste usenet, tu ti caratterizzi come il "compagno" che corre a 
sostenere nazi, anche nelle più infami calunnie antisemite.
IMHO, il fatto che tu abbia rapporti personali con gente legata al 
nazismo internazionale (e alle croci frecciate in particolare) potrebbe 
essere una risposta.
La tua qual è, camerata?


 IMHO, 
non sei credibile per utenti del calibro di Namib e Arturo. Come mai,
goebbelsuccio? Pare che convinci solo menti tarate alla amalric e jurassic
park. LOL!
MMAX l'hai convinto che sono un camerata? ri-LOL!


 e in cosa starei soccorrendo artamano?
Camerata, a te risulta normale intervenire insultando chi contraddice in 
un nazi molto noto mentre lancia orride calunnie antisemite?
Credo di sì. E' normale.
E' un po' il tuo ruolo su usenet, da quando esisti come maschera.
Il "compagno" che duetta col nazi, insultando gli avversari dialettici 
dei nazi.
Peccato che tu non sia un compagno.
Puoi spiegare il tuo ruolo organizzativo, nella propaganda nazi su 
usenet? Grazie, camerata.


 usenet? 
ok, ti mando anche la lista degli arruolati. A che indirizzo?
AntonioPinter@.... ? ROTFL


 una coppia di razzisti
Camerata lapparella. Tu stai intervenendo in un thread dove artamano, 
nazi piuttosto noto, riversa una tonnellata di liquame antisemita doc.
Roba sul talmud e gli ebrei, nemmeno mascherata da antisionismo.
E la "coppia di razzisti" contro cui ritieni di schierarti sarebbe chi 
contraddice l'antisemita, notando che del talmud non sa un cazzo.
IMHO dovresti spiegare come mai, da quando usenet eseiste, questo sia il 
tuo pattern costante. Insulti a chi discute con nazisti e antisemiti.
Naturalmente camuffato sotto una esile maschera da compagno, di cui è 
stata provata la falsità.
Puoi spiegare, camerata, qual è il tuo ruolo organizzativo nella 
propaganda nazi su usenet?
Tb


 usenet?


 ok, ti mando 
Non hai ancora mandato la risposta a una domanda molto semplice.
Come mai ti schieri dalla parte di un noto nazi come artamano, in un 
thread dove artamano diffonde una tonnellata di liquame antisemita sul 
talmud e gli ebrei?
Ne aggiungo un'altra.
Come mai lappare nazi è insultare chi respinge il liquame antisemita è 
il tuo pattern costante da quando esiste usenet?
Ho visto all'opera diversi compagni molto stupidi, qualcuno chiaramente 
antisemita, ma mai uno che scegliesse infallibilmente il nazi e le sue 
campagne antisemite.
Infatti tu non sei un compagno, come è stato dimostrato.
Credo che una tua risposta sarebbe opportuna, camerata.


 Infatti tu non sei un compagno, come è stato dimostrato.
peccato per te che non sei risultato credibile fuori dalla tua cerchia di
mentecatti alla amalric,orso,jurassici pirla.
-- 


 Credo che una tua risposta sarebbe opportuna, camerata.
Non avere fretta.
Il tempo è galantuomo (e Sergio è un somaro).
-- 
Davide

 Quoto.
ROTFL!
ecco l'avvocaticchio delle crocefrecciate...
-- 


 peccato per te 
No, io sono contentissimo che chi conosce bene il pdci ti abbia 
irrimediabilmente sputtanato. Adesso è tutto molto più chiaro, camerata.
Quoto i thread rilevanti.
Sergio non è del PDCI
http://snipurl.com/1wz6m
http://snipurl.com/1wz6h


 crocefrecciate...
A proposito. Come mai hai passato anni a lappare un agitatore neonazi, 
di un giornale finanziato dalle croci frecciate?
Insieme alla questione del perché ti schieri con artamano mentre versa 
liquame antisemita, credo che sia un'altra cosa che devi spiegare, camerata.


 Insieme alla questione del perché ti schieri con artamano 
mostra pure il quote del mio sostegno ad artamano.


 No, io sono contentissimo che chi conosce bene il pdci
ROTFL! chi ? 


 come mai 
Non è una risposta (oltre a essere una dimostrabile palla).
Allora, camerata, come mai lappavi un neonazi e ti schieri con artamano 
mentre versa liquame antisemita?


 ROTFL!
Hai poco da rotflare, camerata.
-- 
Davide

 ROTFL! 
Sì, è stato molto divertente vederti messo alle corde, e poi sputtanato 
irrimediabilmente
Non sei del PDCI
http://snipurl.com/1wz6m
http://snipurl.com/1wz6h
In compenso ti si trova sempre al fianco di qualche nazi. Poco noto ma 
molto attivo. Ma anche molto noto come artamano. Anche mentre versa 
liquame antisemita a tonnellate.
Puoi spiegare come mai, camerata?


 wrote:


ROTFL! 


 mentre versa liquame antisemita?
mostri dove mi schiero a favore di artamano, erede di un crocefrecciata
con il naso lungo lungo?


 Non sei del PDCI
ROTFL!


 mostri 
Già fatto. E noto che non stai rispondendo.
Forse, invece, sarebbe il caso, camerata.


 ROTFL! 
Somaro, somaro...
Chissà come sei buffo quando fai il passo dell'oca, onagro orbaciato.
-- 
Davide

 Chissà come sei buffo quando fai il passo dell'oca, onagro orbaciato.
guardati allo specchietto, taorminuccio de IPI.


 Già fatto.
Falso goebbelsuccio. dov'è il quote in cui io sostengo le tesi di artamano?


 Falso
Come mai in un thread dove artamano versa tonnellate di liquame 
antisemita, tu intervieni per insultare chi glielo fa notare?
Il thread è su IPS "Ebrei, su internet c'è un'altra lista nera".
E' un chiaro comportamento da nazi, camerata. Spero ne converrai.


 Il thread è su IPS "Ebrei, su internet c'è un'altra lista nera".
ICS


 antisemita, tu intervieni per insultare chi glielo fa notare?
perche' tu e arduino, noto fascista diffamatore di partigiani e noto
razzista, non siete credibili nemmeno contro artamano.


 perche' tu e arduino, noto fascista 
Artamano dunque non è fascista?
Come mai preferisci un noto nazi, mentre versa liquame antisemita?
Credo che questo serva a disegnare una mappa del fascismo su usenet.
Arduino, artamano, tu.
Compagini litigiose, ognuna con le sue priorità.
Tu hai quella di fare da sponda alle campagne antisemite di nazi noti e 
meno noti, con una esile, e già caduta, mascherina rossobruna.


 Tu hai quella di fare da sponda alle campagne antisemite di nazi noti 
nazi tipo Chomsky. LOL


 è come voi. 
Strano quindi che non ti venga in mente di insultarlo, mentre versa 
tonnellate di liquame antisemita.
Mentre invece arrivi fresco, a insultare chi dice che del talmud non sa 
un cazzo.
IMHO non sei credibile, camerata.
Anche perché insultare chi discute con antisemiti è un po' il tuo 
specifico da quando esisti su usenet.


 Strano quindi che non ti venga in mente di insultarlo
fai una ricerca con google su it.cultura.storia .
Oppure prova a chiedere al tuo amichetto zanardo.


 fai una ricerca
Ho trovato un thread di ieri, in cui insulti chi dubita della sua 
competenza talmudica, mentre arty (anche lui affezionato lettore di Uomo 
Libero) diffonde liquame antisemita a bidoni.
Strano per un comunista.
Ma abbastanza normale per un lappanazi, sempre ddalla parte dei pių 
llaidi antisemiti, il cui idolo politico č un razzista russo (namib l0ha 
definito "razzista), un somaro la cui militanza comunista č stata 
dimostrata come assoluta bufala.
Puoi spiegare meglio i tuoi rapporti con la propaganda nazi su usenet, 
camerata?
Tb
-- 
Libertā per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


 camerata?
a quale indirizzo ti mando l'incartamento? AntonioPinter@ .... ? 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm


 rotfl! 
Portombrello di artamano. Ecco la parte che ti brucia.
 > 
http://snipurl.com/20j6y
Tb
-- 
Libertą per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


Ecco la parte che ti brucia.
rotfl! provare che sostengo artamano prima. Mostra un solo quote in quel 
thread. 
-- 


 disse
Portambrello di artamano, ecco quello che ti brucia e che continui a 
cuttare disperatamente.
 > 
http://snipurl.com/20j6y
Magari poi con calma vorrai spiegare perché intervenire in una 
discussione dalla parte di un nazi mentre diffonde tonnellate di merda 
antisemita.
Vero, camerata?
Tb
-- 
Libertà per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,
