Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Beware of Barak

Beware of Barak 
 
by Ran HaCohen 
Israeli "Defense" Minister Ehud Barak is definitely the most dangerous
politician in the Middle East. Ahmadinejad can only dream of having the
powers – political and military, conventional and non-conventional – that
Barak already possesses. Netanyahu and other far-right Israeli politicians
say what they think and are earmarked as extremists, so they are under
permanent scrutiny. Barak is more extreme than Netanyahu, but he's an
extremist in disguise.
The person who destroyed the Oslo Process and initiated the second
Intifada, the person who demolished the Israeli peace camp from within, by
spreading legends about a "generous offer" rejected by the Palestinian, by
persuading the Israelis that he "unmasked" Arafat and that there was no
Palestinian partner – this person still calls himself "the leader of the
Israeli peace camp." That's one of Barak's most dangerous traits: his
inherent untruthfulness, his presenting himself as the very opposite of
what he actually is.
Barak hasn't changed. As Yedioth Ahronoth announced just a few months ago
("Labor Leader More Right-Wing Than Netanyahu," Aug. 10, 2007), Barak
described the renewal of the peace talks as "a fantasy," said "there is no
difference between Hamas and Fatah"; promised "I will not remove
roadblocks in the West Bank"; and repeated his old mantra, "there is no
chance for a settlement with the Palestinians." 
Indeed, Barak opposed the Annapolis Summit all along. His opposition
turned into reserved support just a few weeks before, when it became clear
the meeting would be nothing but a photo-op. On top of it, to make sure
nothing comes out of the newly launched process, Barak repeatedly calls to
resume peace negotiations with Syria, simultaneously with the Palestinian
track. A characteristic Barakian trick: urging to resume peace talks with
Syria enables Barak to boost his false reputation as a man of peace even
as he knowingly works to sabotage any prospect of peace. In an official
report written under then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak in 2000, recently
obtained and published in Hebrew by Ha'aretz (Dec. 13, 2007), Barak's
bureau chief wrote that resuming negotiations with Syria had led to
extreme distrust and stiffening on the Palestinian side, and, on top of
it, that the Israeli team had been unable to manage negotiations on both
fronts simultaneously. In other words, resuming negotiations with Syria is
a tested measure to make sure the Palestinian track doesn't work, and
Barak is playing this dirty card for the second time. 
Barak promised to quit the coalition with Olmert after the publication of
the Winograd Commission final report, which is likely to blame Olmert for
the failed war in Lebanon in summer 2006. He has now hinted, through his
"aides," that he won't keep his promise (Barak never speaks to the media;
he sends his "aides" to hint at his intentions, so that no one can hold
him responsible for anything he actually says). It is quite likely that
Barak's perverse logic leads him to plan his return to the prime
minister's office by way of a "small" war. Once Olmert is officially
discredited for the failed Lebanon war, Barak as defense minister can hope
to take all the credit for a new, successful war – a big operation in Gaza
("drawing nearer all the time," as Barak tirelessly repeats), a war on
Syria, a strike on Iran, or a combination of all these. Such a war would
also be an excellent pretext to break his promise to exit the coalition:
after all, it would be "irresponsible" to quit when a war is imminent. 
Barak knows all too well how to get Israel into a war, even behind the
government's back if needed: after all, it was young Maj. Gen. Barak who
in the early 1980s recommended to his superiors in the army to use
deception in order to allure the Israeli government and public into a war
in Lebanon. 
Rwanda Is Richer
Much of the foreign news in the popular media falls under "infotainment":
"Man Bites Dog," "Host Eats Guest," "Woman Dry-Cleans Cat." Recently this
kind of reporting – in both style and contents – is applied ever more
often to the Gaza Strip, a region under effective Israeli control, just an
hour's ride from Tel Aviv. We are informed about the price of a pack of
cigarettes in besieged Gaza – more than $15 – while 63 percent of Gaza
residents live on less than $2.50 a day, beating the poverty rate of
Rwanda. We watch an amused television report about a soft-drink producer
in the Strip, who, unable to get CO2-gas, found an original way to produce
soda pop using some other, available gas. Or about a dramatic rise in the
prices of donkeys, since there is no gasoline for cars, and how the
transport of goods is done by animals. Great pictures: The soft-drink
producer proudly showing his chemical invention, shaking off allegations
it may cause cancer. A starving Gazan donkey auctioned for $60, $75, $100,
the seller saying he cannot afford to feed it. Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh
congratulating his people on the Muslim holiday of Eid ul-Adha, admitting
there are no lambs to sacrifice in the starving Strip.
Hermetically under siege, after decades of occupation and years of
Intifada in which Israel destroyed the little infrastructure that the
Strip ever had, following many months of total embargo on everything
except basic food products, which brought the economy to a halt, with
daily invasions of Israeli tanks and extra-judicial killings by Israeli
airplanes, and now with gasoline supplies cut and electricity supply to be
reduced soon, the Gaza Strip (1.5 million people, 80 percent refugees) is
no longer the world's biggest open-air prison. It's a huge laboratory for
human experimentation, run by the Israeli army.
Some of these reports came together with the "good news" about the
international community promising to give more than $7 billion to the
Palestinian Authority over the next three years. Some Israeli commentators
described the promised sum as the biggest amount ever given to any leader
anywhere, though it is significantly smaller than the American military
support given to the regional power, Israel, in any given three years.
Others quickly calculated that every Palestinian family would "earn" about
a $1,000 a month, if the sum were to be divided equally; but, they added
triumphantly, we all know that most of it would get to the corrupt pockets
of the Fatah leadership and not to the poor guy selling his donkey in
Gaza. Dramatic sigh of despair and self-righteousness: once again, the
Palestinians are to blame for their own plight. No one bothers to take the
thought a step forward – for example, to wonder why Israel is so anxious
to keep alive the corrupt Fatah leadership, even after it lost the support
of its own people and was overthrown in Gaza, precisely because of its
inherent corruption. 
The public discourse in Israel does love questions – but only of the kind
posed by President Shimon Peres last week: "There's not a single Israeli
settler or soldier in Gaza now, so why do they shoot at us?" Yes, why do
they?
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 by Ran HaCohen
guardate un po' a chi piace questo tizio:
http://www.forzanuova.org/osservatori_onu.htm



Solita sbobbina brunobruna che il ciuchino degusta con mossette da
sommelier.
Gli basta un retrogusto di complotto, un sentore di antisionismo, una
persistenza antiamericana e via... down the hatch!
Ingoia qualunque cosa il nostro somarello dalle papille ottuse dal
culo dilatato.
<:3)-


ed è straordinario quanto posto ci sia, dentro quel corpicino da mezza
sega

 
http://www.forzanuova.org/osservatori_onu.htm
per svicolare sul contenuto dell'articolo il fascistoide dott.zana' tira
fuori un articolo di Blondet in cui viene nominato Ran HaCohen. 
E allora?
 HaCohen smette di essere ebreo israeliano per questo? 
Stai organizzando una squadraccia di picchiatori del likud contro Ran per
fargli cambiare idea , zanà?


  HaCohen smette di essere ebreo israeliano per questo?
no di certo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ran_HaCohen
zana' rosica abbestia (guarda un po' che lavoro fa....)
questo è il sito neonazi (rotfl) dove scrive le sue lettere da Israele
http://antiwar.com/hacohen/

 per svicolare 
Insomma, camerata, sei sempre a suggere il pendolo di nazi.
Stucchevole.
Tb
-- 
Libertà per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,
Basel Hurani, 'Abd al-Halim Rumieh, Ratib Sha'bu, and Doha 'Ashur
al-'Askari 
http://snipurl.com/1oqtm

 Insomma, camerata, sei sempre a suggere il pendolo di nazi.
nazi che insegnano nelle università israeliane. Altro che zog
onnipotente, questi pagano i nazi per insegnare ai loro figli, roba da
guinness dei primati del masochismo...

 Insomma, camerata, sei sempre a suggere il pendolo di nazi.
quello lo facevano i tuoi parenti ungheresi a Budapest.
Fra l'altro io ho postato l'articolo di quel pericolo neonazista ebreo
israeliano di nome Ran HaCohen e non l'articolo di Blondet. Quelli li
legge il tuo amichetto zanardo.
E ora Pinter, hai qualcosa da commentare sul contenuto dell'articolo di
Ran HaCohen o vuoi buttarla in caciara come sempre?
Beware of Barak 
by Ran HaCohen 






Rwanda Is Richer 




 
 
-- 


 nazi che insegnano nelle università israeliane
I nazi che ci si sdilinquiscono e producono la sbobbina di cui il pornosomaro è 
estremamente ghiotto.


 quello lo facevano i tuoi parenti ungheresi a Budapest.
Mi spiace sergio, ma la tua attività è dimostrata e dimostrabile.
E lo stile è peraltro inconfondibile, camerata.


 Mi spiace sergio, ma la tua attività è dimostrata e dimostrabile.
"Idiozie" [cit. Namib]


 I nazi che ci si sdilinquiscono 
e Ran sarebbe un nazi? ma rotfl!!!!!!!!


 "Idiozie" [cit. Namib]
Fatti
Per esempio, il 25 febbraio 2003, in una pausa delle lappate di culo, chiedevi 
al camerata Dente Blu, tuo sodale usenettiano e motozappa reclutante del gruppo 
di nazi di Uomo Libero.
||||||||||||||
P.s.: ma un indirizzo email privato per comunicare in privato me lo dai?
||||||||||||||
Interessante, vero, camerata?


 e Ran sarebbe un nazi? 
Forza Nuova, camerata.
Strano che abbiate le stesse opinioni politiche <g>.
Tb
-- 
Libertą per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


 Fatti
ROTFL!
"Idiozie" [cit. Namib]
Convinci Namib che sono un neonazista , goebbelsuccio.
 
-- 


 Forza Nuova, camerata.
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
su dimostra che Ran sia di Forza Nuova, Pinter


 >  HaCohen smette di essere ebreo israeliano per questo?
assolutamente no. Nemmeno Rauti smette di essere italiano.


minchia, uno che scrive su 
antiwar.com
 è un fascista? Però...

 ROTFL!
Per esempio, il 25 febbraio 2003, in una pausa delle lappate di culo, chiedevi 


 su dimostra che Ran sia di Forza 
Non hai capito un cazzo, camerata.
Il lappanazi sei tu.
Per esempio, il 25 febbraio 2003, in una pausa delle lappate di culo, chiedevi 
al camerata Dente Blu, tuo sodale usenettiano e motozappa reclutante del gruppo 
di nazi di Uomo Libero.
||||||||||||||
P.s.: ma un indirizzo email privato per comunicare in privato me lo dai?
||||||||||||||
Interessante, vero, camerata?
Tb
-- 
Libertà per i comunisti siriani in carcere: Fateh Jamus, 'Isam Dimashqi,


 Strano che abbiate le stesse opinioni politiche <g>.
Strano?
Per nulla.
<:3)-

 Per esempio,
ROTFL!



Sei un viscido, nahum, te lo avevo già detto?

>Per esempio,
Per esempio, il 25 febbraio 2003, in una pausa delle lappate di culo, chiedevi 
al camerata Donato Naccarella, tuo sodale usenettiano de gruppo neonazi di Uomo 


 Interessante, vero, camerata?
Interessante la tua campagna pubblicitaria, bagarozzo, ma non sei credibile, 
tutto qui.

 credibile
Sono quote, Persio.
E lo specchietto disperato è un'arma un po' da pirla.
Un po' tanto.


 Un po' tanto.
Si, come i giochetti sui tempi e sulla sequenza degli eventi, manipolatore da 
strapazzo, e pirla.

 Si, come i giochetti sui tempi e sulla sequenza degli eventi
Un nazi, molte lappate, scambi di indirizzi, e qualche strano post di estrema 
destra che appare qua e là nel mare della fuffa somaresca.
Il tuo problema è che credi che gli altri non sappiano leggere le fonti.
Per questo sei un pirla.


 Per questo sei un pirla.
E' proprio perché ha la prova certa che non sapete "leggere" (indovinare? 
dedurre?) le fonti che affermo che non sei/siete credibile/i.  E la prova me 
l'hai fornita proprio tu, pirla.