Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: francesi uccisi dall'ISI, non da islamicisti

Ora solo in inglese, scusate, ma è molto interessante, speriamo che
fra poco l'informazione sarà disponibile anche in italiano.
--
http://beta.thehindu.com/news/international/article410979.ece
ISI behind Frenchmen death?
Vaiju Naravane
2002 Karachi blast was in revenge for unpaid kickbacks
The assassination of 11 French engineers in a bomb blast in Karachi in
2002 may not be the work of Islamist terrorists, as alleged these past
years, but an act of retaliation carried out by Pakistan's army and
Inter-Services Intelligence in response to the French State's failure
to pay Pakistani officials $33 million in promised kickbacks for a
€1.8-billion contract for the purchase of Agosta submarines in 1994.
In documents published on Monday the left wing daily Liberation
alleges that intermediaries close to then French Prime Minister
Edouard Balladur (1994) received “retro commissions” or reverse
kickbacks for the contract and that 10 million French Francs (€1.5
million) of that money found their way into Mr. Balladur's campaign
fund for his presidential bid of 1995. The paper has obtained a copy
of the 197-page armaments contract between France and Pakistan, a
document which the French state has stubbornly refused to give the
investigating magistrates looking into the Karachi bomb blast.
Liberation revealed that in the final phase of the negotiations, Mr.
Balladur imposed two Lebanese businessmen as intermediaries on the
Pakistani negotiators. The deal which was then struck, the daily
alleges, was that Pakistani officials would receive 338 million French
Francs as commission for signing on the dotted line, while another 216
million would be added to the price of the contract and returned to
the French as reverse kickbacks.
Liberation gives details of how a web of offshore companies was
created to channel the alleged commission payments. It also quotes
from a confidential report written by a former French intelligence
officer about the case. The secret memo says Pakistani officials kept
asking for the unpaid bribes for several years.
Mr. Balladur lost the election to his arch rival Jacques Chirac who
then decided to stop the payment of commissions to the Pakistani
officials. The Pakistanis sent several messages to the French warning
of dire consequences if the “debt” remained unpaid.
In June 2009, The Hindu, on the basis of discussions with lawyers
close to the enquiry reported that investigating magistrates, Marc
Trevidic and Yves Jannier had obtained a top secret internal memo
containing the above allegations in October 2008 from the state-owned
military shipbuilder DCN which supplied the submarines.
For the past seven years, French investigators have suspected that
Islamist terrorists of being behind the Karachi attack. Now an
entirely different and hugely compromising scenario is emerging.
“There was a terrorist act in which French citizens were killed,” said
Morice, a lawyer acting on behalf of the victims' families. “The
motive, however, was not Islamic terrorism at all but revenge for the
fact that France did not pay commissions it had pledged to pay.”
Today, Mr. Morice said President Sarkozy, who was then Minister for
the Budget and in that capacity gave the deal the green light, bore a
heavy burden of responsibility. “Mr. Sarkozy is at the heart of this
corruption scandal that has cost the lives of several Frenchmen,” said
Mr. Morice in a radio interview.
Mr. Balladur said he had no knowledge of these retro commissions and
that his campaign accounts had been validated by the central audit
office.

 fra poco l'informazione sarà disponibile anche in italiano.
Oh, "islamisti" passi, ma... "islamicisti"?
Namib 


deve essere un calco da quell'insulto alla lingua italiana di
"laicisti" che i clericofascisti usano come insulto contro i laici.

 "laicisti" che i clericofascisti usano come insulto contro i laici.
E' solo un falso amico dall'inglese islamicist.  Infatti
immediatamente dopo di averlo scritto ho pensato che probabilmente
islamista sarebbe la corretta forma italiana, scusate.

 Vero.
Cioè chi considera che una posizione sia giusta/sbagliata a
prescindere, senza
bisogno di confrontarsi con le idee diverse sostenute da altri o senza
bisogno
neppure di prenderla in considerazione e sentire le ragioni di chi la
sostiene,
è un idiota!
Nell'insieme troviamo poi gli idioti laici (=laicisti), gli idioti
cattolici
(cattolicisti?), gli idioti islamici (islamicisti?), gli idioti atei
(ateisti?), ecc., ecc., ecc.
Fabio.