Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Perche' un vero stato Palestinese sara' sempre una Bantustan

http://themagneszionist.blogspot.com/
 (un'ottimo blog di un dissidente
Israeliano) pubblica una notizia completamente ignorata dai media
nostrani, e la interpreta nel modo giusto
http://themagneszionist.blogspot.com/2008/06/another-argument-against-two-state.html
Today Haaretz reported here that Israel once again held up the
transfer of PA tax funds. Those are funds collected by Israel for the
PA from Palestinians. They don't do this out of the goodness of their
heart; they do this because the Palestinians are not allowed the
structures to do so themselves under the (defunct) Oslo agreements.
Israel actually enjoys this privilege. For if the PA wants their tax
money, they have to make sure not to offend their Israeli masters.
Why did the Israelis hold up the tax funds this time? Well, one would
suspect that it was because of widespread Palestinian protests and
work-stoppages, right? No, that wouldn't work, would it, since Israel
could care less about Palestinian protests. Oh, well, perhaps it was a
response to all the terror emanating from the West Bank? No, that
can't be it, since there is virtually no terror coming from the West
Bank. It can't be because of Gaza, since Gaza is under siege.
No, the real reason was that the Palestinian prime minister got
uppity. I mean, he had the chutzpah to call on the European Union not
to upgrade its relations with Israel. And why not? Because of the
human rights violations on the West Bank and the ongoing expansion of
settlements. And doggone it, that OFFENDED the Israeli authorities who
decided to teach Fayid a lesson.
I am not making this next quote up. An Israeli official said.
    "We're not an unfeeling ATM," one official told him. "We too are
permitted to get angry when such scummy things are done to us."
Oh, the humanity of that official! He is not an unfeeling ATM machine.
Can you imagine if Israel actually had ATM machines with feelings like
that of the official? Like Seinfeld's Soup Nazi they would shout,
"Hey, you didn't punch my numbers the right way; no money for you!"
If Israel was so upset by what Fayyad did, wouldn't it be more
appropriate for them to communicate their displeasure to him, instead
of depriving the PA employees the salaries paid by their own tax
money?
So why is this an argument against the two-state solution? Simple.
Whatever state the Palestinians have, they will be under the thumb of
Israel. Sure, Israel may not have all the cards they have now, but
they will have most. And you can bet your sweet bippie that the PA
will never have the sort of power over Israeli civil service that
Israel has had for years over the PA's civil service.
Mind you, this is how the government acts when it is miffed by a
Palestinian minister, one, I may mention, who has been universally
praised for his honesty and ability. I shudder to think what it would
do against a country that had economic and military control over
it....
Maybe lob mortar shells?

 Israeliano)
Non mi risulta che Israele sia una dittatura.
Quindi semmai ci sono oppositori (con blogs). Non "dissidenti".
Non mi risulta poi che i dissidenti originali godessero della tua simpatia.
Sei sempre più confuso ed incerto nelle scelte politiche e lessicali.
Db

 Quindi semmai ci sono oppositori (con blogs). Non "dissidenti".
l'autore del blog, inoltre, è un noto professore universitario, che
non rischia certo di venir licenziato per questo suo hobby (che ha
degli aspetti divertenti: coem quando si è messo a cercare la famiglia
che nel 1948 era proprietaria della casa in cui vive, a German Colony.
Non ha informato sugli sviluppi perché la sua ricerca dell'indigeno
arabo è approdata a una famiglia di luterani nati in Slesia. E sì ch
egli sarebbe bastata Wikipedia: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Colony_of_Jerusalem

 Quindi semmai ci sono oppositori (con blogs). Non "dissidenti".
è una potenza occupante. E quindi ci sono dissidenti dall'occupazione.