Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Europe and America toy with Kosovo's fate

Europe and America toy with Kosovo's fate 
13:00 | 12/ 07/ 2007 
 
 
MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti political commentator Vladimir Simonov) - Recently,
Western statements on Kosovo have acquired an almost panicky sense of
urgency. 
Talking about a problem that has been brewing since NATO bombed Yugoslavia
eight years ago, Zalmay Khalilzad, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations,
said the Security Council must make a decision on Kosovo's final status
within 10 days and urged Russia to cooperate. "I think the time has come
for Russia to take a step in the right direction on this issue," he added. 
Christina Gallach, a spokeswoman for European Union foreign policy chief
Javier Solana, was even more adamant. She said that if Russia rejected the
Kosovo independence plan, Brussels would take matters into its own hands
and make an appropriate decision. 
The sensitive reader may think that all Russia has been doing up to now
was making bad decisions or that the UN Security Council, which gives its
permanent members the right to a veto, should be replaced with the "more
responsible" European Union. 
But in reality the situation is different. Russia has rejected the
previous, second draft of the UN Security Council resolution on Kosovo
because of its wording and for more general reasons. Based on the plan
drawn up by Marti Ahtisaari, the UN special envoy for Kosovo, the Western
plan grants the Serbian province "internationally supervised"
independence. Importantly, Russia is not alone on the Security Council -
to some extent its position on Kosovo is supported by China, Indonesia and
South Africa. 
Moscow was absolutely against the draft's provision on automatic
implementation of the Ahtisaari plan, under which Kosovo was to become
independent if the talks between Belgrade and Pristina failed to produce
results within 120 days. Russian diplomats do not believe in automatic
solutions when it comes to centuries-long contradictions between the
principles of national self-determination and territorial integrity. 
Moreover, Vitaly Churkin, Russian ambassador to the United Nations,
pointed out that with the promise of independence after four months
regardless of the outcome, the Kosovo Albanians would not engage in
serious negotiations. 
These are important issues, but they are details. The main point is that
Moscow will object to any version unless it is backed both by Pristina and
Belgrade. Or, to make this statement positive, Moscow will support any
decision if the conflicting parties agree on it. 
"Any other decision will not get past the Security Council," emphasized
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov with his country's veto in mind. 
Russia is convinced that the idea of Kosovo's independence is far-fetched.
Nobody had even mentioned it before NATO bombed Yugoslavia in 1999. At
that time, the discussion centered on various parameters of autonomy and a
change in Yugoslavia's federal structure. 
The bombing dramatically affected Kosovo's demographic make-up - the
Serbian population has dwindled from more than 30% to less than 10% and
been driven into a ghetto. This fact questions the legitimacy of the
province's current authorities. There are grounds to say that the NATO
bombing has largely provoked them into channeling Albanian nationalist
sentiments into a demand for independence. 
Breaking off part of Serbia without its consent will violate its
territorial integrity, thereby creating a very dangerous precedent. There
are more than 200 situations where this principle is at odds with national
self-determination. It is difficult to imagine how much misfortune and
blood a UN Security Council resolution would bring if it were interpreted
by some leaders as a green light to receive as much independence as they
can swallow. The draft's references to the unique character of the Kosovo
situation do not change anything. 
This is why Russia is going to work for a political solution that will be
acceptable to both Belgrade and Pristina. It will use its veto as a last
resort. Moscow believes that the resolution of the highly sensitive and
complicated Kosovo issue requires much more time than it has been given. 
The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti. 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it


Certo certo pat.. pat..
Saluti
--------------------------------
Inviato via 
http://arianna.libero.it/usenet/