Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Pacifisti leggete

 SADDAM E L' AMERICA: due pesi e due misure?
      Due pesi e due misure. Anche la crisi irachena mostra il solito coro a senso
unico dei maestri del pensiero unico e della disinformazione. Per cercare di
riequilibrare la situazione, ti proponiamo venti domande sulla guerra contro
Saddam.
      1. Perché da sempre le manifestazioni pacifiste protestano soltanto contro
gli
interventi militari USA o occidentali (installazione degli euromissili,
prima guerra
del Golfo, Afghanistan, Iraq) e nessuno si è mai mobilitato per protestare
contro le
oltre 40 guerre che insanguinano il mondo e contro i massacri perpetrati in
Sudan,
Congo, Uganda, Timor Est, Cecenia? Le uniche guerre ingiuste sono quelle che
coinvolgono gli USA?
      2. Perché nel 1999 non vi furono manifestazioni contro il governo D'Alema,
che
mandò i nostri aerei a bombardare i serbi senza mandato ONU e senza
autorizzazione
del Parlamento? Forse le uniche guerre "giuste" sono quelle che combatte la
sinistra?
      3. Perché ci si è dimentica che in molte occasioni l'ONU si è dimostrata
incapace di dirimere conflitti e di imporre la forza del diritto e il
rispetto dei
diritti umani? I caschi blu dell'ONU erano presenti in Kosovo e in Ruanda e
assistettero senza intervenire ai massacri, agli stupri, alle devastazioni,
che si
fermarono solo dopo interventi militari senza mandato delle Nazioni Unite.
      4. Perché pochi ricordano che l'anello di collegamento tra Bin Laden e
Saddam
è dato dalla presenza nel Kurdistan iracheno delle basi dei terroristi di
Ansar al
Islam, almeno 600 combattenti di diverse nazionalità arabe, armati dal
regime
iracheno e affiliati ad Al Qaida?
      5. Perché nessuna manifestazione ricorda le vittime angloamericane delle
guerra contro Saddam? Forse i morti alleati sono diversi dai morti iracheni?
      6. Perché si manifesta contro il governo Berlusconi, che si è limitato a
garantire all'alleato americano quanto stabilito dagli accordi bilaterali,
confermati dai governi dell'Ulivo? Il nostro Paese non partecipa alla guerra
contro
il regime iracheno e anzi ha cercato di raggiungere pacificamente
l'obiettivo di
mandare in esilio Saddam e di mantenere uniti sia l'ONU sia l'Unione
europea.
      7. Perché si sostiene che i popoli sono tenuti a liberarsi da soli dei
propri
oppressori dimenticando che senza l'intervento militare degli Usa e degli
alleati l'
Europa e l'Italia sarebbero rimasti sotto il gioco della dittatura
nazifascista?
      8. Perché le manifestazioni pacifiste non si schierano con chiarezza contro
la
dittatura di Saddam Hussein?
      9. Perché ci si dimentica che Saddam ha avuto tempo dodici anni per provare
di
avere effettivamente disarmato e che l'ultima risoluzione ONU (la 1441)
datata 8
novembre 2002, ha di fatto concesso altri quattro mesi e mezzo di tempo per
disarmare?
      10. Perché continuare a strumentalizzare la posizione pacificatrice del
Papa,
trasformandola in una posizione politica di parte? Inoltre il Papa sa che
non è
possibile chiedere "la pace ad ogni costo", poiché nel mondo è impossibile
far
sparire il male (e quindi anche la guerra). Il pacifismo utopico pensa
invece di
eliminare la guerra dall'orizzonte dell'umanità, ignorando che il male è in
ogni
essere umano e quindi non sarà mai possibile realizzare giustizia e pace
assolute in
questo mondo.
      11. Perché non si ricorda che nei mesi trascorsi dall'ultima risoluzione
Saddam ha mostrato di cedere (disarmando troppo poco e a singhiozzo)
solamente ogni
qualvolta la pressione militare si faceva più forte o nei pressi delle
scadenze via
via indicate dagli ispettori ONU?
      12. Perché non si citano mai i contratti stipulati da Francia e Russia con
Saddam per il petrolio? E perché non si dice che solo l'11% delle
importazioni di
petrolio americane vengono dal Golfo, che l'economia USA dipende sempre meno
dal
petrolio perché il progresso tecnologico ne ha dimezzato i consumi rispetto
a trent'
anni fa e che elettricità e riscaldamento sono prodotti quasi interamente da
gas
naturale di produzione interna o canadese?
      13. Perché non si ricorda che l'ipotesi del disarmo pacifico di Saddam e di
un
suo esilio (cui anche la Lega araba ha cercato di indurlo) avrebbero avuto
concrete
possibilità di successo solo se il dittatore iracheno avesse avuto di fronte
una
durissima minaccia militare sostenuta unitariamente da tutta la comunità
internazionale?
      14. Perché non si considera che la differenziazione franco-tedesca - oltre a
spaccare l'Unione europea - unita ai distinguo di Russia e Cina e alle
manifestazioni pacifiste a senso unico contro gli USA hanno oggettivamente
fornito a
Saddam la possibilità di pensare di poter eludere per l'ennesima volta le
risoluzioni ONU?
      15. Perché nessuno ricorda che anche dopo l'ultima risoluzione ONU (la 1441
dell'8 novembre 2002) Saddam ha sempre negato di avere armi proibite, salvo
ammetterlo quando la morsa della pressione militare era diventata massiccia
e
consistente?
      16. Perché i pacifisti non chiedono conto delle 360 tonnellate di armi
chimiche, delle 3.000 tonnellate di precursori chimici necessari per
ottenere armi
chimiche, degli 8.500 litri di antrace, dei 100 missili Al Samoud e degli 80
missili
Scud che mancano all'appello dalla fine del 1998, secondo gli ispettori ONU?
Perché
nessuno ricorda che Khidir Hamza, che fu il responsabile del programma di
riarmo
nucleare iracheno, ha denunciato che entro poco tempo Saddam potrebbe essere
in
grado di produrre due bombe atomiche all'anno? I pacifisti dovrebbero
marciare per l
'eliminazione delle cause della guerra. Forse non ritengono un problema che
l'Iraq
possieda armi di distruzione di massa.
      17. Perché non si riconosce che la base giuridica per fare la guerra a
Saddam
è la risoluzione 687 dell'aprile 1991 (che impone tuttora all'Iraq la
distruzione
del suo arsenale chimico, biologico e missilistico) e che la risoluzione
1441 dell'8
novembre 2002 si è limitata a concedere al dittatore l'ennesima e ultima
possibilità
di disarmare?
      18. Perché si dimentica che Saddam costituisce una permanente minaccia alla
pace mondiale e in particolare è fonte continua di gravi pericoli politici e
militari nella regione del Medio Oriente, in particolare nei confronti del
Kuwait e
di Israele?
      19. Perché non si vuol capire che - dato il potere distruttivo delle armi
chimiche e biologiche, la velocità e la relativa facilità con cui possono
essere
usate contro inermi cittadini e la diffusione delle organizzazioni
terroristiche -
per vincere la sfida del terrorismo occorre cambiare i criteri con i quali
si deve
considerare il concetto di guerra difensiva?
      20. Perché non viene ricordato che il popolo iracheno ha tutto da guadagnare
dalla fine della tirannia di Saddam? La pace è per tutti un valore supremo e
universale, ma la parola pace, separata dalla parola libertà, perde ogni
valore. Per
questo diciamo: "Iraq libero senza se e senza ma!".
 
 
--------------------------------
Inviato via 
http://usenet.libero.it


parole, parole, parole.....
tutte già dette e sentite.
Rimangono soltanto i ragazzi che in questo momento combattono e muoiono in
nome delle Paranoie del recordman di esecuzioni capitali in Texas.
Il ........... ha fatto che in modo che nonostante sia fermamente contrario
alla guerra, sono adesso costretto a pregare:
1. per pochi morti
2. per le truppe alleate
ma questa guerra non gliela perdono (a lui e la sua cricca)!!!!
Viva il Popolo Americano
Abbasso amm. Bush e lobbies varie
Xenam

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:b5pb9q$mko$1...@fata.cs.interbusiness.it...


 questo diciamo: "Iraq libero senza se e senza ma!".
Onestamente non credo che tu abbia veramente a cuore il popolo iracheno più
di Bush stesso, ma francamente anche qui credo che nascerà un paradiso per
pedofili tipo Sud-Est Asiatico dove l'ha approvata perfino il fondo
monetario come soluzione al debito (la Thailandia infatti ha meno deficit,
grazie a prostitute di ambosessi sotto i 10 anni e così Cambogia e Vietnam,
cosa inesistente prima dell'arrivo degli Americani e neanche nuova, vedi "La
Pelle" di Malaparte sul primo dopoguerra a Napoli), cosa che mi auguro
sinceramente non accada o venga mitigata dalla cultura islamica (vedi a che
cosa bisogna ricorrere!)


questo diciamo: "Iraq libero senza se e senza ma!".
Ho capito! E' per questo che Rumsfeld stringeva la mano di Saddam ai
tempi del'attaccoirakeno coi gas ll'Iran!
--------------------------------------------------------
La libertà è libertà di dire che due più due fa quattro.
Concessa questa libertà, tutte le altre ne seguono.
George Orwell, 1984

 era frequentatore abituale delle piazze.
Lo hai detto tu .......
I pacifisti allora non sono frequentatori delle piazze ? Allora quelli che
oggi sventolano le bandiere della pace sono solo antiamericani ? E comunque
gente che la pensa come D'Alema ??????
č veramnte bellissima come risposta č da 20 minuti che rido
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lasciando perdere le altre risposte che sono assurde ... questa mi č
sembrata la piů carina :-)

 tempi del'attaccoirakeno coi gas ll'Iran!
c'è sempre un pericolo maggiore ....


 di grosso!
il contrario ? in che senso
comunque davvero mi hai fatto ridere, grazie davvero !

 > veramente č il contrario, comunque non sono in pochi a pensarla



Non basta che leggano, dovrebbero anche ragionare su ciò che leggono:
Cosa per loro impossibilissima.
Ciao
Ad'I

 il grosso del lavoro di ordine pubblico l'avrebbe fatto il suo servizio
condivido ogni riga e confermo.
--
guilippo

 guardati dal bombardare le camere a gas dei campi di concentramento.
Allora tu dici che gli alleati hanno evitato di bombardare le camere a gas
dei campi di concentramento e questo "fatto" (?) dimostrerebbe
che l'intervento alleato non aveva nessuna motivazione umanitaria.
Lascio ad agniuno il giudizio su questa frase.
Io mi limito a un NO COMMENT per evitare di essere offensivo.
Vedo comunque che scrivi usando il tuo indirizzo di posta di lavoro
alla ANSALDO RICERCHE.
Questo significa che invece di lavorare fai politica.   Ma bravo.
Dai proprio il buon esempio.
ciao bello

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:Ir3ga.13422$i26.3...@news2.tin.it...

--
da i diamanti non nasce niente
da Arduino nascono i fiori

 scioperi di ogni tipo fino a quel momento quasi settimanali...
HAA e lo dici pure ?????
E poi c'è gente che si lamenta perchè qualche "fascista" dice che i
sindacati dicono sempre NO a priori in modo preventivo !!
preventivo ........ ho gia sentito questa parola ..... chissa dove !
ciao gigivi

ciao bello
ciao bellissimo


c'è sempre un pericolo maggiore ....
Sì. Ma il guaio è che se si rafforza AlQaeda con altre truppe USA nel
Golfo 'a violare i luoghi santi' il 'pericolo maggiore' ce lo bechiamo
tutti...
----------------------------
Testo della risoluzione 1441 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 [Print Friendly Version]
 
 
Text of UN Security Council Resolution on Iraq: November 8, 2002
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States
of America: draft resolution
[Adopted as Resolution 1441 at Security Council meeting 4644, 8
November 2002]
The Security Council,
Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its
resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November
1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688
(1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11
October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17
December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its President,
Recalling also its resolution 1382 (2001) of 29 November 2001 and its
intention to implement it fully,
Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions
and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range
missiles poses to international peace and security,
Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to
use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660
(1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to
resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security
in the area,
Further recalling that its resolution 687 (1991) imposed obligations
on Iraq as a necessary step for achievement of its stated objective of
restoring international peace and security in the area,
Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full,
final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991),
of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass
destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one
hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons,
their components and production facilities and locations, as well as
all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for
purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material,
Deploring further that Iraq repeatedly obstructed immediate,
unconditional, and unrestricted access to sites designated by the
United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), failed to cooperate fully and
unconditionally with UNSCOM and IAEA weapons inspectors, as required
by resolution 687 (1991), and ultimately ceased all cooperation with
UNSCOM and the IAEA in 1998,
Deploring the absence, since December 1998, in Iraq of international
monitoring, inspection, and verification, as required by relevant
resolutions, of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, in
spite of the Council’s repeated demands that Iraq provide immediate,
unconditional, and unrestricted access to the United Nations
Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC),
established in resolution 1284 (1999) as the successor organization to
UNSCOM, and the IAEA, and regretting the consequent prolonging of the
crisis in the region and the suffering of the Iraqi people,
Deploring also that the Government of Iraq has failed to comply with
its commitments pursuant to resolution 687 (1991) with regard to
terrorism, pursuant to resolution 688 (1991) to end repression of its
civilian population and to provide access by international
humanitarian organizations to all those in need of assistance in Iraq,
and pursuant to resolutions 686 (1991), 687 (1991), and 1284 (1999) to
return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country
nationals wrongfully detained by Iraq, or to return Kuwaiti property
wrongfully seized by Iraq,
Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the Council declared that
a ceasefire would be based on acceptance by Iraq of the provisions of
that resolution, including the obligations on Iraq contained therein,
Determined to ensure full and immediate compliance by Iraq without
conditions or restrictions with its obligations under resolution 687
(1991) and other relevant resolutions and recalling that the
resolutions of the Council constitute the governing standard of Iraqi
compliance,
Recalling that the effective operation of UNMOVIC, as the successor
organization to the Special Commission, and the IAEA is essential for
the implementation of resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant
resolutions,
Noting the letter dated 16 September 2002 from the Minister for
Foreign Affairs of Iraq addressed to the Secretary-General is a
necessary first step toward rectifying Iraq’s continued failure to
comply with relevant Council resolutions,
Noting further the letter dated 8 October 2002 from the Executive
Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General
Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq laying out the practical
arrangements, as a follow-up to their meeting in Vienna, that are
prerequisites for the resumption of inspections in Iraq by UNMOVIC and
the IAEA, and expressing the gravest concern at the continued failure
by the Government of Iraq to provide confirmation of the arrangements
as laid out in that letter,
Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and the neighbouring States, 
Commending the Secretary-General and members of the League of Arab
States and its Secretary-General for their efforts in this regard,
Determined to secure full compliance with its decisions,
Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its
obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687
(1991), in particular through Iraq’s failure to cooperate with United
Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required
under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by
this resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament
obligations under relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly
decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of
bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process
established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the
Council;
3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament
obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual
declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the
IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this
resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of
all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and
nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such
as unmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on
aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such
weapons, components, sub-components, stocks of agents, and related
material and equipment, the locations and work of its research,
development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical,
biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are
for purposes not related to weapon production or material;
4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations
submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at
any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of,
this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq’s
obligations and will be reported to the Council for assessment in
accordance with paragraphs 11 and 12 below;
5. Decides that Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate,
unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all,
including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment,
records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as
immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all
officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC or the IAEA wish to interview
in the mode or location of UNMOVIC’s or the IAEA’s choice pursuant to
any aspect of their mandates; further decides that UNMOVIC and the
IAEA may at their discretion conduct interviews inside or outside of
Iraq, may facilitate the travel of those interviewed and family
members outside of Iraq, and that, at the sole discretion of UNMOVIC
and the IAEA, such interviews may occur without the presence of
observers from the Iraqi Government; and instructs UNMOVIC and
requests the IAEA to resume inspections no later than 45 days
following adoption of this resolution and to update the Council 60
days thereafter;
6. Endorses the 8 October 2002 letter from the Executive Chairman of
UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of
the Government of Iraq, which is annexed hereto, and decides that the
contents of the letter shall be binding upon Iraq;
7. Decides further that, in view of the prolonged interruption by Iraq
of the presence of UNMOVIC and the IAEA and in order for them to
accomplish the tasks set forth in this resolution and all previous
relevant resolutions and notwithstanding prior understandings, the
Council hereby establishes the following revised or additional
authorities, which shall be binding upon Iraq, to facilitate their
work in Iraq:
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall determine the composition of their
inspection teams and ensure that these teams are composed of the most
qualified and experienced experts available;
– All UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel shall enjoy the privileges and
immunities, corresponding to those of experts on mission, provided in
the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and
the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA;
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have unrestricted rights of entry into
and out of Iraq, the right to free, unrestricted, and immediate
movement to and from inspection sites, and the right to inspect any
sites and buildings, including immediate, unimpeded, unconditional,
and unrestricted access to Presidential Sites equal to that at other
sites, notwithstanding the provisions of resolution 1154 (1998);
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to be provided by Iraq the
names of all personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq’s
chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile programmes and
the associated research, development, and production facilities;
– Security of UNMOVIC and IAEA facilities shall be ensured by
sufficient United Nations security guards;
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to declare, for the
purposes of freezing a site to be inspected, exclusion zones,
including surrounding areas and transit corridors, in which Iraq will
suspend ground and aerial movement so that nothing is changed in or
taken out of a site being inspected;
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the free and unrestricted use and
landing of fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, including manned and
unmanned reconnaissance vehicles;
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right at their sole discretion
verifiably to remove, destroy, or render harmless all prohibited
weapons, subsystems, components, records, materials, and other related
items, and the right to impound or close any facilities or equipment
for the production thereof; and
– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to free import and use of
equipment or materials for inspections and to seize and export any
equipment, materials, or documents taken during inspections, without
search of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or official or personal baggage;
8. Decides further that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts
directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations
or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council
resolution;
9. Requests the Secretary-General immediately to notify Iraq of this
resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within
seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with
this resolution; and demands further that Iraq cooperate immediately,
unconditionally, and actively with UNMOVIC and the IAEA;
10. Requests all Member States to give full support to UNMOVIC and the
IAEA in the discharge of their mandates, including by providing any
information related to prohibited programmes or other aspects of their
mandates, including on Iraqi attempts since 1998 to acquire prohibited
items, and by recommending sites to be inspected, persons to be
interviewed, conditions of such interviews, and data to be collected,
the results of which shall be reported to the Council by UNMOVIC and
the IAEA;
11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General
of the IAEA to report immediately to the Council any interference by
Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to
comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations
regarding inspections under this resolution;
12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report in
accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to consider the
situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant
Council resolutions in order to secure international peace and
security;
13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned
Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its
continued violations of its obligations;
14. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
Annex
Text of Blix/El-Baradei letter
United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission 
The Executive Chairman
 International Atomic Energy Agency
The Director General
 
8 October 2002
Dear General Al-Saadi,
During our recent meeting in Vienna, we discussed practical
arrangements that are prerequisites for the resumption of inspections
in Iraq by UNMOVIC and the IAEA. As you recall, at the end of our
meeting in Vienna we agreed on a statement which listed some of the
principal results achieved, particularly Iraq’s acceptance of all the
rights of inspection provided for in all of the relevant Security
Council resolutions. This acceptance was stated to be without any
conditions attached.
During our 3 October 2002 briefing to the Security Council, members of
the Council suggested that we prepare a written document on all of the
conclusions we reached in Vienna. This letter lists those conclusions
and seeks your confirmation thereof. We shall report accordingly to
the Security Council.
In the statement at the end of the meeting, it was clarified that
UNMOVIC and the IAEA will be granted immediate, unconditional and
unrestricted access to sites, including what was termed "sensitive
sites" in the past. As we noted, however, eight presidential sites
have been the subject of special procedures under a Memorandum of
Understanding of 1998. Should these sites be subject, as all other
sites, to immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access, UNMOVIC
and the IAEA would conduct inspections there with the same
professionalism.
H.E. General Amir H. Al-Saadi
Advisor
Presidential Office
Baghdad
Iraq
We confirm our understanding that UNMOVIC and the IAEA have the right
to determine the number of inspectors required for access to any
particular site. This determination will be made on the basis of the
size and complexity of the site being inspected. We also confirm that
Iraq will be informed of the designation of additional sites, i.e.
sites not declared by Iraq or previously inspected by either UNSCOM or
the IAEA, through a Notification of Inspection (NIS) provided upon
arrival of the inspectors at such sites.
Iraq will ensure that no proscribed material, equipment, records or
other relevant items will be destroyed except in the presence of
UNMOVIC and/or IAEA inspectors, as appropriate, and at their request.
UNMOVIC and the IAEA may conduct interviews with any person in Iraq
whom they believe may have information relevant to their mandate. Iraq
will facilitate such interviews. It is for UNMOVIC and the IAEA to
choose the mode and location for interviews.
The National Monitoring Directorate (NMD) will, as in the past, serve
as the Iraqi counterpart for the inspectors. The Baghdad Ongoing
Monitoring and Verification Centre (BOMVIC) will be maintained on the
same premises and under the same conditions as was the former Baghdad
Monitoring and Verification Centre. The NMD will make available
services as before, cost free, for the refurbishment of the premises.
The NMD will provide free of cost: (a) escorts to facilitate access to
sites to be inspected and communication with personnel to be
interviewed; (b) a hotline for BOMVIC which will be staffed by an
English speaking person on a 24 hour a day/seven days a week basis;
(c) support in terms of personnel and ground transportation within the
country, as requested; and (d) assistance in the movement of materials
and equipment at inspectors’ request (construction, excavation
equipment, etc.). NMD will also ensure that escorts are available in
the event of inspections outside normal working hours, including at
night and on holidays.
Regional UNMOVIC/IAEA offices may be established, for example, in
Basra and Mosul, for the use of their inspectors. For this purpose,
Iraq will provide, without cost, adequate office buildings, staff
accommodation, and appropriate escort personnel.
UNMOVIC and the IAEA may use any type of voice or data transmission,
including satellite and/or inland networks, with or without encryption
capability. UNMOVIC and the IAEA may also install equipment in the
field with the capability for transmission of data directly to the
BOMVIC, New York and Vienna (e.g. sensors, surveillance cameras). This
will be facilitated by Iraq and there will be no interference by Iraq
with UNMOVIC or IAEA communications.
Iraq will provide, without cost, physical protection of all
surveillance equipment, and construct antennae for remote transmission
of data, at the request of UNMOVIC and the IAEA. Upon request by
UNMOVIC through the NMD, Iraq will allocate frequencies for
communications equipment.
Iraq will provide security for all UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel. Secure
and suitable accommodations will be designated at normal rates by Iraq
for these personnel. For their part, UNMOVIC and the IAEA will require
that their staff not stay at any accommodation other than those
identified in consultation with Iraq.
On the use of fixed-wing aircraft for transport of personnel and
equipment and for inspection purposes, it was clarified that aircraft
used by UNMOVIC and IAEA staff arriving in Baghdad may land at Saddam
International Airport. The points of departure of incoming aircraft
will be decided by UNMOVIC. The Rasheed airbase will continue to be
used for UNMOVIC and IAEA helicopter operations. UNMOVIC and Iraq will
establish air liaison offices at the airbase. At both Saddam
International Airport and Rasheed airbase, Iraq will provide the
necessary support premises and facilities. Aircraft fuel will be
provided by Iraq, as before, free of charge.
On the wider issue of air operations in Iraq, both fixed-wing and
rotary, Iraq will guarantee the safety of air operations in its air
space outside the no-fly zones. With regard to air operations in the
no-fly zones, Iraq will take all steps within its control to ensure
the safety of such operations. 
Helicopter flights may be used, as needed, during inspections and for
technical activities, such as gamma detection, without limitation in
all parts of Iraq and without any area excluded. Helicopters may also
be used for medical evacuation.
On the question of aerial imagery, UNMOVIC may wish to resume the use
of U-2 or Mirage overflights. The relevant practical arrangements
would be similar to those implemented in the past. 
As before, visas for all arriving staff will be issued at the point of
entry on the basis of the UN Laissez-Passer or UN Certificate; no
other entry or exit formalities will be required. The aircraft
passenger manifest will be provided one hour in advance of the arrival
of the aircraft in Baghdad. There will be no searching of UNMOVIC or
IAEA personnel or of official or personal baggage. UNMOVIC and the
IAEA will ensure that their personnel respect the laws of Iraq
restricting the export of certain items, for example, those related to
Iraq’s national cultural heritage. UNMOVIC and the IAEA may bring
into, and remove from, Iraq all of the items and materials they
require, including satellite phones and other equipment. With respect
to samples, UNMOVIC and IAEA will, where feasible, split samples so
that Iraq may receive a portion while another portion is kept for
reference purposes. Where appropriate, the organizations will send the
samples to more than one laboratory for analysis.
We would appreciate your confirmation of the above as a correct
reflection of our talks in Vienna.
Naturally, we may need other practical arrangements when proceeding
with inspections. We would expect in such matters, as with the above,
Iraq’s co-operation in all respect. 
Yours sincerely,
(Signed)
(Signed)
Hans Blix
Mohamed ElBaradei
Executive Chairman
Director General
United Nations Monitoring,
International Atomic Energy Agency
Verification and Inspection Commission
 
 
 
 
This site is managed by the Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department
of State.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an
endorsement of the views contained therein.


 coinvolgono gli USA?
Piů che altro quando coinvolgono noi che siamo alleati (ma non sudditi)
dell'America.
Saluti.


Da pomer nascono le sequoie.
Ad'I

dove nascono i fiori  vi è un humus migliore

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:a2qga.51684$7y3.1...@twister1.libero.it...

e meglio che tu non sappia come nasce l'Humus .......