Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Re: ricordiamo chi stava dalla parte del generale Lee 160 anni fa

 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS_Alabama
 
 
E' naturale e logico: l'Impero Britt era ideologicamente votato al
globalismo liberista e freetradista, proprio come i confederati.
 
 
-- 
IN EVRO NVLLA SALVS

 
 
Oltre a scrivere un mucchio di scemenze nemmeno leggete gli articoli che postate.
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj


1. Non ho postato alcun articolo.
2. Qualunque cosa ci sia scritta nell'articolo postato da giovannino,
quanto affermato da giovannino e da me è storicamente accurato.


 
 
Che i brits stessero dalla parte dei confederati non ha niente di storico. E' una scemenza e basta.
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj


il generale Lee evidentemente non lo sapeva 
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/25/5-surprising-moments-between-popes-and-presidents/
 
 
2. A pope almost recognized the Confederacy
 
At the height of the Civil War, Confederate President Jefferson Davis wrote to Pope Pius IX, thanking him for his kind sentiments in calling for a resolution to the Civil War.
 
The Catholic-educated but Protestant Davis went on to ask the Pope for his recognition of the Confederate States. Throughout the war, the Confederacy had tried and failed to get recognition from other European states.
 
“For the Vatican, this is a very difficult situation: here they have one part of a fractured country seeking their support, and they don't often get this,” Moss said.
 
Pope Pius IX replied a few months later addressing Davis as “Illustrious and Honorable Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America.”
 
By conferring the title and honorifics on Davis, the Pope appeared to legitimatize the rebellious states. "It's a scandal all over the Union newspapers," Moss said. "This leads to the complete breakdown in ties between the U.S. and the Holy See.”
 
This perceived slight led Congress to explicitly ban diplomatic ties with the Vatican in 1867.


 
" William Ewart Gladstone, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and a senior
Liberal leader was friendly toward slavery; his family had grown wealthy
through the ownership of slaves in the West Indies. He strongly
spoke out for Confederate independence. When the Emancipation
Proclamation was announced, he tried to make the counterargument that an
independent Confederacy would do a better job of freeing the slaves than
an invading northern army would. He warned that a race war was imminent
and would justify British intervention. Emancipation also alarmed
the British Foreign Secretary Lord John Russell, who expected a bloody
slave uprising. The question then would be British intervention on
humanitarian grounds. "
 
Ma guarda un po'. L'intervento militare umanitario (a sostegno dei
poveri piantatori schiavisti che scappano dalla guerra) per farsi i
propri sporchi interessi è una specialità delle élites degli anglos da
oltre 150 anni.


 Liberal leader was friendly toward slavery
 
non c'e' stato nessun riconoscimento, e la Gran Bretagna, ai tempi della Guerra di Secessione, aveva messo fuori legge la tratta, a suon di cannonate e impiccaggioni, da piu' di mezzo secolo.
 
ma non ti stanchi mai di raccontare balle?


ma per fortuna che ci sono i sudisti ad opporsi a questa vergognosa elite anglos.

 L'intervento militare
 
Non ci fu.
 
--
dhcmrlchtdj