Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Israel acts because the world won't defend it

The Times
January 7, 2009
 Daniel Finkelstein
The scenes from Gaza are heartbreaking. But the whole conflict could
be avoided if the Palestinians said one small thing
It was strictly forbidden to have a notebook in Belsen, but my Aunt
Ruth had one anyway. Just a little pocket diary - an appointment book
with one of those tiny pencils. And in it, in the autumn of 1944, she
noted that Anne Frank and Anne's sister, Ruth's schoolfriend Margot,
had arrived in the concentration camp.
My mother and my aunt had been watching through the camp wire when the
Franks arrived. Mum remembers it well, because they had been excited
to spot girls they knew from the old days in Amsterdam. They had
played in the same streets, been to the same schools and Ruth and
Margot attended Hebrew classes together. The pair had once been
pressed into service to act as bridesmaids, when a secretive Jewish
wedding had taken place at the synagogue during their lesson time.
But Ruth and Margot did not grow up together. Because while Ruth and
my mother lived, Margot and Anne never left Belsen. They died of
typhus.
I am telling you this story because I want you to understand Israel.
Not to agree with all it does, not to keep quiet when you want to
protest against its actions, not to side with it always, merely to
understand Israel.
There are two things about the tale that help to provide insight. The
first is that all these things, the gas chambers, the concentration
camps, the attempt to wipe Jews from the face of the Earth, they
aren't ancient history, and they aren't fable. They happened to real
people and they happened in our lifetime. Anne and Margot Frank were
just children to my aunt and my mother; they weren't icons, or symbols
of anything.
The second is that world opinion weeps now for Anne Frank. But world
opinion did not save her.
The origin of the state of Israel is not religion or nationalism, it
is the experience of oppression and murder, the fear of total
annihilation and the bitter conclusion that world opinion could not be
relied upon to protect the Jews.
Israel was the idea of a journalist. Theodor Herzl was the Paris
correspondent of the Neue Freie Presse when he witnessed anti-Semitic
rioting against the Jewish army captain Alfred Dreyfus who had been
falsely accused of espionage. Herzl was then among the small corps of
journalists who in 1895 witnessed the famous ceremony of disgrace in
which Dreyfus was stripped of his epaulettes.
The experience led Herzl to abandon his belief in assimilation. He
became convinced that Jews would only be safe if they had their own
national home. Herzl became the first leader of modern Zionism. For
many years many Jews resisted Herzl's conclusion. My grandfather was
among them. But the experience of Jews all over the world in the first
half of the 20th century - not just in Europe but in the Middle East
too - rather bore out Herzl.
So when Israel is urged to respect world opinion and put its faith in
the international community the point is rather being missed. The very
idea of Israel is a rejection of this option. Israel only exists
because Jews do not feel safe as the wards of world opinion. Zionism,
that word that is so abused, so reviled, is founded on a determination
that, at the end of the day, somehow the Jews will defend themselves
and their fellow Jews from destruction. If world opinion was enough,
there would be no Israel.
The poverty and the death and the despair among the Palestinians in
Gaza moves me to tears. How can it not? Who can see pictures of
children in a war zone or a slum street and not be angry and
bewildered and driven to protest? And what is so appalling is that it
is so unnecessary. For there can be peace and prosperity at the
smallest of prices. The Palestinians need only say that they will
allow Israel to exist in peace. They need only say this tiny thing,
and mean it, and there is pretty much nothing they cannot have.
Yet they will not say it. And they will not mean it. For they do not
want the Jews. Again and again - again and again - the Palestinians
have been offered a nation state in a divided Palestine. And again and
again they have turned the offer down, for it has always been more
important to drive out the Jews than to have a Palestinian state. It
is difficult sometimes to avoid the feeling that Hamas and Hezbollah
don't want to kill Jews because they hate Israel. They hate Israel
because they want to kill Jews.
There cannot be peace until this changes. For Israel will not rely on
airy guarantees and international gestures to defend it. At its very
core, it will not. It will lay down its arms when the Jews are safe,
but it will not do it until they are.
And if you reflect on it, doesn't recent experience bear this out?
Just as Herzl was borne out? A year or so back I met a teacher while I
was on holiday and fell to talking with him about Israel. He was a
nice man and all he wanted was for fighting to stop and to end the
suffering of children. And he had a question for me.
Why, he asked, doesn't Israel offer to give back the West Bank and
Gaza? Why doesn't it just let the Palestinians have a state there? If
the Palestinians turned it down, he said, then at least liberal
opinion would be on Israel's side and would rally to its assistance.
So I patiently explained to this kind, good man that Israel had, at
Camp David in 2000, made precisely this offer and that it had been
rejected out of hand by Yassir Arafat, not even used as the basis for
negotiation. I told him that Israel was no longer in Gaza, having
withdrawn unilaterally and taken the settlers with it. The
Palestinians had greeted this movement with suicide bombs and rockets.
Yet the teacher, with all his compassion, wasn't even aware of all
this. And liberal opinion? Sad to relate, my new friend's faith in it
was misplaced. It has turned strongly against Israel.
Israel has made many mistakes. It has acted too aggressively on some
occasions, has been too defensive on others. The country hasn't always
respected the human rights of its enemies as it should have done. What
nation under such a threat would have avoided all errors?
But you know what? As Iran gets a nuclear weapon and so the potential
for another Holocaust against the Jews and world opinion does nothing,
I am not so sure that the errors of world opinion are so much to be
preferred to the errors of Israel

 > If world opinion was enough, there would be no Israel.
Da signature.
Tb

 > If world opinion was enough, there would be 
more palestinian children
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 preferred to the errors of Israel
Direi che ha perfettamente ragione.
Carlo ``Jurassic Park``

 more palestinian children
sergio muove e matta. Del resto chi continua a difendere Israele
ancora sta invitando chiunque a metterla in rete a porta vuota...