Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: matrimonio gay e senso della nostra civilta'

questo e' il migliore articolo sull'argomento
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/what-let-gays-get-married-we-must-be-bonkers-8629685.html
 
 
 
 
According to opponents of the new law, once gays can get married, that
cheapens the marriages of everyone who isn’t gay. This shows how
powerful a gay wedding is, because no other marriages have been able
to ruin everyone else’s like this. No one suggested that marriage was
cheapened because Fred and Rose West were married, because, while
their marriage was unconventional in certain respects, at least it was
a union between man and woman, and that’s the main thing.
 
Similarly, Hitler and Eva Braun’s marriage didn’t lessen the sanctity
of heterosexual blessings, because whatever else, their ceremony in
the bunker was healthy and natural and not all icky and weird.
 
But now gays can get married, the offices at Relate will be bursting.
Couples will have to be seen six at a time to fit them all in. “Our
marriage seems pointless now,” they’ll whimper. “Now gays can get
married, we spend every evening shooting each other with air rifles
and we’ve put our kids into care.”
 
This is the latest of a long line of things we can no longer enjoy
because gays are allowed to do them as well. Since homosexuality was
legalised in 1967, hardly anyone has bothered to have heterosexual
sex, as it’s been cheapened. And these days why should a married
couple bother buying toothpaste, or food, when lesbians can legally
buy them as well?
 
For some, it’s even more serious. Tory councillor James Malliff said
if we legalise gay marriage “we may as well legalise marriage with
animals”. Because would any of us react differently to either of the
following statements: a) “I’m Brian, and this is my husband, Kevin” or
b) “I’m Brian, and this is my husband. I keep him in a matchbox
because he’s a wasp.”
 
Several MPs opposed to gay marriage asked, “Where will this lead
next?” They should have a competition to see who can go the furthest,
with Edward Leigh yelling: “Then we’ll be allowed to marry a stick of
rock, which will get jealous if it suspects the man has chewed a
liquorice allsort, then the man will notice the rock has ‘I want a
divorce’ written all through it, and it will move out to live in a tin
on housing benefit which the taxpayer pays for, and if we refuse we’ll
be taken to the European Court of Confectionary Rights.”
 
James Malliff can trump him by pointing out that next we’ll be allowed
to marry attitudes, so a man will marry wistfulness, but if the owners
of a bed and breakfast turn the couple away because their religion
considers it a sin to be wistful, THEY’LL be the ones put in jail in
these days of political correctness. Gerald Howarth opposed the bill,
claiming it’s a result of the “aggressive homosexual community”. And
you can see his point, because look at the aggression in society, and
who’s always at the heart of it – homosexuals. Football crowds chant
“the colour co-ordinations on your away strip are shit, and you know
they are”, then it all kicks off.
 
And there’s no greater sign of a community behaving aggressively than
when it asks to be allowed to get married. That’s what happened to the
Vikings. They were peaceful at first, then they were allowed to get
married, and it was just pillage, pillage, pillage. So you’ll want to
keep clear of these aggressive homosexual weddings, which will go, “Do
you take this man to be your lawful wedded spouse”? “Of COURSE, I do
you arsehole. Shut it, vicar. Now listen you witnesses, if just one
flake of confetti lands on my blond highlights I’ll cut yer.”
 
John Stanley, MP for Tonbridge, said gay marriage will be “unhelpful
to young people being attracted to others of the same sex before
arriving at being heterosexual”. Because it’s been such a help, over
the years, to young people attracted to others of the same sex, to
know they can’t marry the person they’re attracted to. Many people, in
an even more dedicated effort to help, have called these young people
perverts and spat at them and insisted they’ll go to hell, so that
they can arrive at being heterosexual, enjoying a proper wedding with
someone of the opposite sex who they’re not really attracted to, which
always ensures a long, healthy and uncheapened marriage.
 
The idea that we need laws to discourage people from being gay
suggests that opponents of gay marriage aren’t confident about
heterosexuality being “natural” at all. Because they seem to assume
that once the law’s changed, straight people will think “Now gay
weddings are legal I might as well be gay”. Because our sexuality is
shaped, above all, by what’s legal. Make it legal to marry furniture
and we’ll all be rubbing ourselves up and down the sideboard, and
downloading hardcore copies of The Antiques Roadshow.
 
The complaints also suggest that where the Labour Party did undergo a
genuine transformation, during which the beliefs it was founded on
were largely discarded, the Conservative Party remains, at heart,
unchanged, wedded to values immeasurably more dated than anything
offered by the trade unions.
 
And you can understand why, because whenever one of these couples
who’ve been together for 60 years are asked for their secret to a long
and happy marriage, they say: “The main thing that’s kept us together
is knowing that gays aren’t allowed to do it, isn’t it, dear?”
 
“Yes, dear. We’ve had our ups and downs but, even in the rocky times,
knowing that gays can’t marry each other has seen us through. I’ll put
the kettle on.

 
http://www.independent.co.uk
 
 
lo vedi che sei ancora un lurido comunista? :D