Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Blix da Fazio

Dure accuse contro Bush

 Ora sarà bollato come comunista mangiabambini
Siamo tutti comunisti se no nsiamo servi, rassegnatevi.

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:ZcNrc.229568$hc5.9...@news3.tin.it...

Vediamo cosa dicevano tempo fa.
NEW YORK - Arms inspections are a `hoax,' said Tariq Aziz, Iraq's Deputy
Prime Minister, in a forthright and chilling interview with ABC News last
week, `war is `inevitable.' Aziz is the smartest, most credible member of
President Saddam  Hussein's otherwise sinister regime - my view after
covering Iraq since 1976.
What the US wants is not `regime change' in Iraq but rather `region change,'
charged Aziz. He tersely summed up the Bush Administration reasons for war
against Iraq: `oil and Israel.'
Aziz's undiplomatic language underlines growing fears across the Mideast
that the Bush Administration intends to use a
manufactured war against Iraq to redraw the political map of the region, put
it under permanent US military control, and seize its vast oil resources.
These are not idle alarms. Senior administration officials openly speak of
invading Iran, Syria, Libya, and Lebanon. Influential, pro-Israel
neo-conservative think tanks in Washington have deployed small army of
`experts' on TV urging the US to remove governments deemed unfriendly to the
US and Israel. Washington's most powerful lobbies - the oil and Israel
lobbies - are urging the US seize Mideast oil and crush any regional states
that might one day challenge Israel's nuclear monopoly or regional
superpower dominance.
The radical transformation of the Mideast being considered by the Bush
Administration is potentially the biggest political
change since the notorious 1916 Sykes-Picot Treaty in which victorious
Britain and France carved up the Ottoman-ruled region. Under review at the
highest level:
* Iraq is to be placed under US military rule. Iraq's current leadership,
notably Saddam Hussein and Tarik Aziz, will face US drumhead courts martial
and firing squads. Iraq will be broken up into three, semi-autonomous
regions: Kurdish north; Sunnis center; Shia south. Iraq's oil will be
exploited by US and British firms. Iraq will become a major customer for US
arms.
Turkey may get a slice of northern Iraq around the Kirkuk and Mosul oil
fields. US forces will repress any attempts by Kurds to set up an
independent state. A military dictatorship or kingdom will eventually be
created.
The swift, ruthless crushing of Iraq is expected to terrify Arab states,
Palestinians, and Iran into obeying US political dictates.
* Independent-minded Syria will be ordered to cease support for Lebanon's
Hizbullah, and allow Israel to dominate Jordan and Lebanon, or face invasion
and `regime change.' The US will anyway undermine the ruling Ba'ath regime
and young leader, Bashir Asad, replacing him by a French-based exile regime.
France will get renewed influence in Syria as a consolation prize for losing
out in Iraq to the Americans and Brits. Historical note: in 1949, the US
staged its first coup in Syria, using General Husni Zai'im to overthrow a
civilian government.
* Iran will be severely pressured to dismantle its nuclear and missile
programs or face attack by US forces. Israel's rightist Likud Party, which
guides much of the Bush Administration's Mideast thinking, sees Iran, not
demolished Iraq, and its principal foe and threat, and is pressing
Washington to attack Iran once Iraq is finished off. At minimum, the US will
encourage an uprising against Iran's Islamic regime, replacing it with
either a royalist government or one drawn from US-based Iranian exiles.
* Saudi Arabia - Current White House thinking is to keep the royal family in
power, but compel it to become more responsive to US demands, and to clamp
down on its increasingly anti-American population. If this fails, CIA is
reportedly cultivating senior Saudi Air Force officers who could overthrow
the royal government and bring in a compliant military regime like that of
Gen. Musharraf in Pakistan. Or, Saudi Arabia could be portioned; the
oil-rich eastern region would be made into another American protectorate,
like Kuwait or Qatar, while the western portion, with Islam's holy places,
could be left to the Saudis or a new Hashemite dynasty.
* The most important Arab nation, Egypt - with 40% of all Arabs - will
remain a bastion of US influence. The US controls 50% of Egypt's food
supply, 85% of its arms and spare parts, and keeps the military regime of
Gen. Husni Mubarak in power. Once leader of the Arabs, Egypt is keeping a
very low profile in the current Iraq crisis, meekly cooperating with US war
plans.
* Jordan - A US-Israeli protectorate. Its royal family, the Hashemites, are
being considered as possible figurehead rulers of US-occupied `liberated'
Iraq; more remotely, for Saudi Arabia and/or Syria. The British Empire put
the Hashemites on the thrones of Transjordan and Iraq after WWI.
* Lebanon - To become an Israeli protectorate and commercial center
dominated by Maronite Christian rightists.
* The Gulf Emirates and Oman: former British protectorates, now American
protectorates, in effect, tiny colonies.
* Libya - Madcap Col. Khadaffi remains on Washingtn's black list and is
marked for extinction once bigger game is bagged. The US wants Libya's
high-quality oil. Britain may reassert its former influence here.
* Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia - Short of revolution, will remain loyal
western satraps under highly repressive,
French-backed royalist and military regimes.
* Yemen - Former British imperial base at Aden, and former French base at
Djibouti, will become important permanent US bases.
* Palestine - The White House hopes Palestinians will be cowed by Iraq's
destruction, and forced to accept US-Israeli plans to become a
self-governing but isolated native reservation surrounded by Israeli forces.
The lines drawn in the Mideast by old European imperial powers are now to be
re-drawn by the world's newest imperial power, the United States. But, as
veteran soldiers know, even the best strategic plans become worthless once
real fighting begins.
Dec. 9, 2002
Copyright: Eric S. Margolis, 2002 - 
http://www.bigeye.com/120902.htm
--
http://www.hyperlinker.com/spg/
-
http://www.hyperlinker.com/spg/spg_it_1.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------

 wrote in message
news:MPG.1b19bf90b...@news.tin.it...

Nee..., anche gli anarchici non sono servi e non sono comunisti...non sono
fascisti either...
K

 Siamo tutti comunisti se non siamo servi, rassegnatevi.
Vorresti dire che noi comunisti non serviamo? Aho, pure tu te ce metti

ams67 ha scritto:


Non hai capito il senso del mio post che cerco di ribadire:
AGLI OCCHI DEI SERVI, tutti quelli che non sono servi allora sono
comunisti.
Chiedi infatti a un ebete di destra cosa pensa degli anarchici, scommetot
quello che vuoi che li chiamerà comunisti.
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 quello che vuoi che li chiamerà comunisti.
I got it...
K