Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: tutti eredi di Rabin

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3797525,00.html
Rabin’s many successors
By now, virtually all Zionist parties have adopted Yitzhak Rabin’s doctrine
Eitan Haber
Here is the truth and there is no other: From the day the three shots
were fired into the back of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Israel has
deteriorated in almost all areas.
You want facts? Here you go: Economic growth in the mid 1990s, during
Rabin’s days, stood at 6% a year. What has it been since then, and now?
About 80 kings, presidents, and prime ministers arrived in Israel for
official visits back then. How many have arrived since then, and how
many are coming these days?
About 200 multinational companies (yes, such as McDonald’s) entered the
Israeli market at the time. How many are doing it today? The Israeli
prime minister visited states that for dozens of years refused to
endorse such visits. Dozens of states recognized Israel and opened
embassies here.
Israel, amazingly enough, inaugurated missions in seven Arab states
(Tunisia, Morocco, Oman, Jordan, Mauritania, Qatar, and Dubai.)
Unemployment was drastically down. The education budget was doubled. New
interchanges were paved, the building of the Cross-Israel Highway got
underway, and so did the construction of the new Ben-Gurion
International Airport. What else could we have asked for?
Nonetheless, some people would say that the despicable murderer, may his
memory be cursed, succeeded in his mission. The fact is that the peace
process with the Palestinians and with other Arab states is stuck,
dying, and on the verge of breathing its last breath.
So, did the murderer succeed? That’s nonsense. What used to be the
almost exclusive doctrine of Yitzhak Rabin (in brave partnership with
Shimon Peres) has become the anthem of almost everyone else, including
Likud. Words like “Palestinian state,” which Rabin hesitated to utter
publicly (and in fact never did) have become the repeated mantra of
Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni, and now, please welcome him with
loud applause, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Missing the good old captain
Just a reminder: This is the same Netanyahu who harshly criticized Rabin
at the time. Sharon and Olmert have already publicly declared that they
were wrong. Netanyahu will be saying it in the future. We need to show
consideration here: It isn’t easy to change a worn-out doctrine that one
was presented with since childhood.
In fact, almost all Zionist parties have adopted the fundamentals of the
agreement in principle signed in Oslo; each party did it in its own way.
Yitzhak Rabin can indeed rest in peace – he has successors.
Some will say that the danger of evacuation from Judea, Samaria, and the
Golan Heights is gone – so the despicable murderer needs to be
satisfied. So, did he succeed? Bullshit! In his own lifetime he will be
seeing a giant evacuation operation that will be made possible only in
the wake of his despicable act.
Yitzhak Rabin, in private conversations at least, hinted that he intends
to fight for 20-40% of Judea and Samaria territory and maintain a large
part of the settlement enterprise. Today, in the face of Obama, Putin
and Ahmadinejad, let’s see his successors fighting. Barak fought for 3%.
Olmert for about 2-3% of the territory.		
Fourteen years have passed. Memories are becoming blurred. Yitzhak
Rabin’s figure is distancing. His grand deeds are becoming part of
everyday life (for example, the lights installed along the Jerusalem-Tel
Aviv Highway.) Meanwhile, his less successful acts, and there were some
of those too, are being prominently referred to by his rivals and
presented as failures.
Meanwhile, the foolish people who continue to enjoy the false tales of
“conspiracy” in relation to the murder babble on, and they join many
others fools aboard a ship that travels through a stormy sea.
Aboard this ship, all that is left is to long for the good old captain –
Yitzhak Rabin.

 Yitzhak Rabin, in private conversations at least
che pezzo di merda...siccome la realtà gli dà torto, si inventa
conversazioni private di un morto che ovviamente non può rispondere.
Questo non è vilipendio di cadavere?