Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Tempi duri per israhell

Forse smettera' di fare il 'bulletto'...
Con L'Iran che diventa parte del 'club atomico' Israhell dovra'
ridimensionarsi...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040613/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear&cid=540&ncid=716
Iran Toughens Stance on Nuclear Program
Sun Jun 13, 6:55 AM ET
By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer
TEHRAN, Iran - Toughening its stance in advance of a meeting of the U.N.
nuclear watchdog agency, Iran on Saturday said it would reject international
restrictions on its nuclear program and challenged the world to accept
Tehran as a member of the "nuclear club."
Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi rejected further outside influence on
Tehran's nuclear ambitions two days before the International Atomic Energy
Agency board of governors meets to discuss Iran's highly controversial
program.
"We won't accept any new obligations," Kharrazi said. "Iran has a high
technical capability and has to be recognized by the international community
as a member of the nuclear club. This is an irreversible path."
Iran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear program is geared toward generating
electricity, not making weapons, but the United States and its allies say
Tehran has a secret nuclear weapons program. The IAEA has wrestled with the
dilemma for more than a year.
Iran has already suspended uranium enrichment and stopped building
centrifuges. It has also allowed IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities
without prior notice, part of the additional protocol to the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty that still must be approved by parliament.
Kharrazi insisted that Iran would not give up its development of the nuclear
fuel cycle, the steps for processing and enriching uranium necessary for
both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. Iran says it has achieved the full
cycle, but is not now enriching uranium.
"That somebody demands that we give up the nuclear fuel cycle ... is an
additional demand," Kharrazi said, apparently referring to demands by U.S.
and European countries that Iran halt operations of a plant it inaugurated
in March in Isfahan, central Iran, that processes uranium into gas. The
demand also calls for aborting plans to build a heavy water reactor in Arak,
another city in central Iran.
"We can't accept such an additional demand, which is contrary to our legal
and legitimate rights," he said. "No one in Iran can make a decision to deny
the nation of something that is a source of pride."
Iran has confirmed possessing technology to extract uranium ore, processing
it into a powder called yellow cake and then converting it into gas. The gas
is then injected into centrifuges for low-grade enrichment that turns it
into fuel for nuclear reactors.
Uranium enriched to low levels has energy uses, while highly enriched
uranium can be used in bombs.
Iran suspended uranium enrichment last year under mounting international
pressure. In April, it said it had stopped building centrifuges. IAEA
inspectors had found traces of highly enriched uranium at two sites, which
Iranian officials have maintained was from contaminated imported materials.
Kharrazi condemned a draft resolution critical of Iran drawn up by Germany,
France and Britain and being debated before the IAEA board meeting Monday
which says Iran's cooperation has not been complete.
"The draft resolution is unacceptable unless changes are made so that it can
be acceptable to all parties," he said.
The minister said insistence by Europeans on "very tiny issues is contrary
to the spirit of cooperation." He said that by doing so, the European
countries are bowing to U.S. pressure and showing a "lack of independence."
Kharrazi warned that failure in settling the debate over Iran's nuclear
dossier will be a "failure for all," including Iran, Europe and the IAEA.
The minister confirmed Iran's efforts to buy 4,000 magnets needed for
uranium enrichment equipment, saying the issue was blown out of proportion.
He did not say where the magnets were bought.
Diplomats told The Associated Press in Vienna that Iran had acknowledged
inquiring about 4,000 magnets needed for uranium enrichment equipment with a
European black-market supplier and had dangled the possibility of buying a
"higher number."
"If everybody is looking to settle this issue (Iran's nuclear dossier), they
have to look at it in a broad outlook," Kharrazi said.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said last month his agency had not found proof
to date of a concrete link between Iran's nuclear activities and its
military program, but "it was premature to make a judgment."
K
PS. Se ce le hanno gli israeliani che non hanno mai accettato ispezione e'
giusto (in linea di principio) che ce l'abbiano anche gli iraniani. In
realta' non dovrebbe averle nessuno...

 In realta' non dovrebbe averle nessuno...
Evidentemente la stragrande maggioranza dergli stati, che ha firmato
l'NPT, non e' daccordo con te.
Ale
-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - 
http://www.Mailgate.ORG

 l'NPT, non e' daccordo con te.
Peccato...
K

 Peccato...
Brutto quando la realta' collide con le proprie fantasie <g>


 Brutto quando la realta' collide con le proprie fantasie <g>
Ancor piu' brutto e' quando la realta non collide con il 'common sense' <g>
K

 Ancor piu' brutto e' quando la realta non collide con il 'common sense'
<g>
Correzione...elimina il 'non'
Ancor piu' brutto e' quando la realta collide con il 'common sense'
K

 Ancor piu' brutto e' quando la realta non collide con il 'common sense' <g>
"The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense."
  --  Tom Clancy
Raffaele
-- 
Raffaele Castagno
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

   --  Tom Clancy
Appunto. Per questo lasciatemi 'fantasticare'...(making sense)...
K

iraniani.
Mi dispiace ma cosi' non e'. Israele non ha firmato il patto di non
proliferazione nucleare. L'Iran si.
-Stefano

Che che senso ha firmare quel documento se non e' firmato da tutti?
Proteggersi dall'uso di chi ha armi atomiche e che ha siglato quel
documento? :)
-Stefano

 Ancor piu' brutto e' quando la realta non collide con il 'common sense' <g>
Ti chiami Common?


 CVD. Tu non *devi*, tu *puoi*.
??


sense' <g>
E da quando tu saresti un esperto di "common sense"? :)
*ROTFL*
-Stefano


Spiritoso...
K

 Un trattato di merda che ha creato dei 'bulli'...
Non vorrei intromettermi, con un intervento che tra l'altro aggiunge poco,
ma mi pare che entrambi siate sostanzialmente d'accordo sulla, chiamiamola
cosě "anomalia" del trattato di non-proliferazione, che serve solo a
mantenere lo status quo, solo che ams67 non riesce a capacitarsene e cerca
un senso a tutto questo.

 wrote in message
news:nJezc.461509$rM4.19...@news4.tin.it...

Non voglio cercare un senso. Voglio dimostrare che non c'e'.
K

 -Stefano
E'scientificamente provato che quel documento difende più dello scudo
spaziale USA! Per sicurezza sto pensando di fotocopiarmelo e distribuirlo
ai miei figli ed a tutti gli amici. Suggerisco anche a tutti voi di fare
lo stesso: così il mondo sarà salvo dalle armi di distruzione di
massa...almeno da quelle di Saddam!
-- 


 K
Mi pare che Peldigral abbia detto che č inutile cercarlo=non c'č. Per la
proprietą transitiva "perversa" tutti e tre dite la stessa cosa, ma
tentate di "non" essere d'accordo su di essa!
Mi spiegate cos'ho scritto?


E'scientificamente provato che quel documento difende più dello scudo
Complimenti per il cumulo di stronzate che hai scritto.
Hai mostrato pienamente il tuo livello intellettivo.
-Stefano

 Mi spiegate cos'ho scritto?
Hai spiegato, in maniera molto efficace, come funziona la politica in
generale...
K