Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: 'What Should NATO Do?'

'What Should NATO Do?' 
 
by Neil Kitson 
Matt asked me this question (Matt being Matthew Barganier, merciless
editor at this Web site) in response to a draft rant from me about NATO's
role in Afghanistan. It's a good question: what should NATO do in
Afghanistan? Here's my answer: (1) read the Globe and Mail, (2) take it to
the streets. I don't think there's an Afghan edition of the Globe and
Mail, but there should be. Home delivery in the Pashtun translation would
solve a lot of problems, but it's not like you can just throw a newspaper
at somebody's front porch in Kandahar at 6 a.m. without worrying about the
consequences.
The Globe is "Canada's National Newspaper" and has a distinguished
history, blotted by its support for the Iraq misadventure and the
Afghanistan disaster. I have been sarcastic about it on this very Web
site; nevertheless, the Globe has some fabulous reporters who hold the
keys to the future, and NATO should read these guys. Meanwhile, NATO is
lining itself up for what Alexander Cockburn called The Tenth Crusade.
Pope Urban's more famous (so far) First Crusade "took its first public
shape at the Council of Piacenza, where in March 1095 Urban received an
ambassador from the Byzantine emperor Alexius I Comnenus, asking for help
against the Muslims." It didn't work, relying as it did on primitive
communications and technology. People had to be killed by hand. No more. A
modern Crusade can be waged ruthlessly from space, at hypersonic speed,
antiseptically, from anywhere within the continental USA… or Brussels.
North Americans, from right-wing nutbars like Ron Parsley to trendy
Manhattan artist John Currin, have decided we're at war with Islam,
whoever "we" are.
Meanwhile George Bush (Urban Lite) will be flying to a NATO meeting in
Romania to promote the "mission" in Afghanistan, which has not been
defined but is legally a "collective right of self-defense" enshrined in
the NATO Charter (Article 5) and the UN Charter (Article 51), and
dignified by UN Security Council Resolution 1386 and subsequent
extensions. So, now that NATO has defended itself by quelling the
terrorist upwelling in Afghanistan – that fearsome boring of termite holes
into the Hindu Kush, with legions of mindless workers serving a bloated
terrorist queen who incubates nuclear weapons composed of spare parts
supplied by A.Q. Khan – now that we've stopped all that, what do we do?
Go small or go home. Gen. Dan McNeill says it would take 400,000 NATO
troops to occupy Afghanistan, and it ain't gonna happen, there being some
40,000 troops available now, and many of those on a short leash. NATO is
stuck in Afghanistan like the U.S. is stuck in Iraq. There is no plan.
This was made clear by the French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, who
obviously has a black sense of humor, since he explained that "a strategy
is necessary." The real answer lies in the street. 
As reported by Oliver Moore, heroic volunteers are immunizing children
against polio in southern Afghanistan, and it's working. As reported by
Mark MacKinnon, local movements are achieving some peace and stability in
the Middle East, where ponderous international intervention has failed.
And as reported by Stephanie Nolen, local action in Mali has made an
enormous difference in the quality of life for women and children.
What NATO should do is declare victory and go home. The future of the
world lies in self-determination, not global policing. NATO should
recognize that the military solution is bankrupt and withdraw. NATO can't
make Kosovo work, it can't make Afghanistan work, it can't make anything
work. What it can do is support international humanitarian law, the
International Committee of the Red Cross, and the United Nations (bumbling
as these institutions might be), and withdraw, making offers of support
for basic services such as clean water and clearance of land mines.
NATO's origins in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland, were admirable, but
something has gone terribly awry. Built to save the world from a
totalitarian menace, NATO now seems a purpose without a cause, an enormous
military enterprise drifting into the hands of people who think Pope Urban
had the right idea but not enough firepower.
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
VOTATE LA SINISTRA L'ARCOBALENO
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 VOTATE LA SINISTRA L'ARCOBALENO
#_ Sara`fatto!!
Giano