Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Il cambio di strategia di Hamas

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3534103,00.html
Dal terrorismo "statistico" di razzi e mitragliate contro i civili ad 
azioni di qualità finalizzate alla cattura di prigionieri.
Obiettivo: una pressione su Israele (che i razzi hanno fallito) che 
induca alla cessazione delle stretta su Gaza, cessazione da cui dipende 
la sopravvivenza politica di Hamas.
Migliorano le capacità di Hamas, grazie agli addestramenti in Siria e in 
Iran, migliorano  anche le capacità dell'IDF.
Il second best di Hamas è una pausa dei combattimenti, che le permetta 
di riorganizzarsi in previsione dello scontro su larga scala con l'IDF.
Pp
-- 
Il dubbio è il padre della pigrizia [shadal]

 la sopravvivenza politica di Hamas.
certo che sei bravo a berti le cazzate della propaganda.
Praticamente sei un Propagandaholic


Una bella analisi dello stesso articolo qui:
http://jewssansfrontieres.blogspot.com/2008/04/hamas-evolves-in-right-direction-or.html
Hamas evolves in the right direction, or spot the fascist
According to military Analyst Rob Ben Yishai Hamas is moving towards a
strategy of "quality" guerrilla attacks on military targets. The
reason?
    Hamas leaders in Gaza and Damascus who are carefully, if not
passionately, following Israeli media reports apparently concluded,
just like Hizbullah realized in the Second Lebanon War, that the
Israeli public is sensitive to casualties among troops more than it is
sensitive to moral and physical damage caused to civilians as a result
of the Qassams and Grads in Sderot and Ashkelon. (Ynet, April 21,
2008)
Let me first say that this is fantastic news. The focus on military
targets is important both morally and strategically. It also reflects
increased self-confidence and greater operational capacity.
But let's just think for a moment about what Ben Yishai says. The
Israeli public cares more about the life of soldiers, whose very job
description implies the risk of death and injury, than about the life
of civilian residents, including children in Sderot.
It is a bit warped, isn't it? Soldiers are supposed to take risks
defending civilians. That is the theory behind the official name of
the Herrenvolk army, i.e. "Israel defense forces."
But that is not how fascist ideologies work. Civilians are
unimportant. The fascist state isn't an institution whose purpose is
to secure inalienable rights or promote the pursuit of happiness. The
state of Israel is sacred. Moreover, this sacred status is not based
on religious belief. Moshe Dayan, who was as irreligious as one can
ever be, referred to the state of Israel as "the third temple." The
sacred state is its own religion. The state is the altar and the
temple at which Israelis are supposed to worship and, when necessary,
sacrifice themselves.
Uniformed soldiers are therefore sacred. They are the altar boys of
fascism. Killing them is blasphemy and lèse majesté. In contrast, the
death of civilians can be sad, painful, scary. But it remains a purely
secular affair. And since it is a secular affair, it is subject to
rational cost-benefit considerations. Israelis living around Tel Aaviv
have a good degree of tolerance for civilians casualties, especially
when the casualties are from Sderot or Shlomi.
Finally, how does Ben Yishai think the Herrenvolk army should counter
the new direction taken by Hamas?
    In order to deter Hamas from implementing its new strategy and
combat methods, a strategic balance of terror must be created vis-à-
vis the organization... the fuel supply and humanitarian aid directed
into the Strip should be curbed to a minimum, until the attacks stop.
Ben Yishai believes that merely killing the guerrillas and frustrating
their operations is not going to be enough. They won't be deterred
unless the ratchet is tightened and Palestinian noncombatants suffer a
great deal more.
No brownie points for noting that Ben Yishai advocates terrorism,
massive human rights abuse and potentially genocide. This is what
colonialism looks like.
But consider this: according to Ben Yishai, in Israel, the public is
more sensitive to the death of soldiers than to the suffering of
civilians. Hamas, according to Ben Yishai, has the very opposite
sensitivity, it values the suffering of civilians over and above the
life of its guerrilla units.
Perhaps Israel refuses to negotiate with Hamas because Hamas is just
not fascist enough for Israel.

 wrote:
Tň, un altro lurido e vigliacco sciacallo da plonkare.
E smettila di morfare, fetida boascia.
-- 
Davide

 certo che 
Merdadivacca, essù.
Torna ad agitartelo sulla foto di Kim Il Sung.
Pp

 not fascist enough for Israel.
ovvio