Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Debunking 6 Myths About Anders Breivik

http://www.jidaily.com/pNM/e
1. Anders Behring Breivik was a Fundamentalist Christian
Breivik described himself as not a religious person and mentions
praying only once. His plans leading up to the attacks involved
multiple visits to prostitutes. In one section of his manifesto he
clarifies what he means by Christian.
    Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a
Justiciar Knight?
    no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or
Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that
you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist (an atheist who
wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian
cultural legacy
Breivik did call himself a Christian, but meant that in a cultural
sense, rather than a theological one. He emphasized that he was not
seeking a theocracy, but a secular society. His idea of a Christian
Europe had nothing to do with religion.
2. Anders Behring Breivik Hated Muslims
Breivik viewed Muslims as the enemy, but only domestically. He
emphasized that; "Knights Templar do not intend to persecute devout
Muslims"
And he contemplated collaborating with them on terrorist attacks
against Europe. "An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial
to both parties... We both share one common goal."  The Caliphate was
a useful enemy for his cause.
In Breivik's own words, this is how such an arrangement would play
out;
    "They are asked to provide a biological compound manufactured by
Muslim scientists in the Middle East. Hamas and several Jihadi groups
have labs and they have the potential to provide such substances.
Their problem is finding suitable martyrs who can pass “screenings” in
Western Europe. This is where we come in. We will smuggle it in to the
EU and distribute it at a target of our choosing. We must give them
assurances that we are not to harm any Muslims etc."
Ask yourself is these are the words of a anti-Jihadist who was
fighting against Islam. Or a delusional European terrorist who was
willing to ally with Jihadist against his fellow Europeans.
Breivik spells out that he is willing to kill Europeans on behalf of
just about anyone...
    There might come a time when we, the PCCTS, Knights Templar will
consider to use or even to work as a proxy for the enemies of our
enemies.
    Under these circumstances, the PCCTS, Knights Templar will for the
future consider working with the enemies of the EU/US hegemony such as
Iran (South Korea is unlikely), al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab or the rest of
the devout fractions of the Islamic Ummah with the intention for
deployment of small nuclear, radiological, biological or chemical
weapons in Western European capitals and other high priority
locations.
    Justiciar Knights and other European Christian martyrs can avoid
the scrutiny normally reserved for individuals of Arab descent and we
can ensure successful deployment and detonation in the location of our
choice.
This should put to rest any idea that Breivik was on a crusade against
Islam. He was a deluded man who imagined himself leading a takeover of
Europe, even if he had to serve as a Muslim proxy to do it.
 3. Anders Behring Breivik was Inspired by Counterjihad Bloggers
Except Breivik didn't actually kill Muslims. Instead he claimed to be
part of a modern Templar Knights organization that was going to take
over Europe. Breivik played role playing video games obsessively. One
of his favorites was Dragon Age, one of whose characters is a Templar
Knight who hacks his way to power.
Did the game inspire Breivik to become a modern Templar Knight? As
much as Catcher in the Rye inspired the murder of John Lennon.
Breivik was manic depressive and using steroids while obsessively
acting out power fantasies. He built up a fantasy world that convinced
him he could become, "...a hero of Europe... A perfect example which
should be copied, applauded and celebrated. The Perfect Knight I have
always strived to be."
Trying to apply rational standards to Breivik is futile. Like many
killers he was of above average intelligence, but below average
sanity. Remove the politics, and Breivik fits the profile of most
spree killers. He was angry at society, a loner, suffered from mental
problems, abused drugs (in his case steroids) and acted out violent
scenarios in violent video games.
4. Anders Behring Breivik was Pro-Israel
Breivik was in favor of allying with Israel, India and other
minorities in the Muslim world as part of the struggle against Islam.
The idea that he was a Zionist or felt any particular affinity for
Israel is baseless. Rather Breivik describes the majority of German
Jews as disloyal and suggests that if Hitler had deported them,
instead of exterminating them he would have become a hero.
    If the NSDAP had been isolationistic instead of imperialistic
(expansionist) and just deported the Jews (to a liberated and Muslim
free Zion) instead of massacring them, the anti-European hate ideology
known as multiculturalism would have never been institutionalized in
Western Europe
Breivik does mention that large numbers of Jews would have to be
executed as Class A or Class B traitors, but urges targeting by
political belief, rather than by race.
5. Anders Behring Breivik was a Moderate
Breivik pretended to be a moderate for tactical reasons. He explored
National Socialism and formulated his own plan under another name. In
his social networking, he describes, "sharing “moderate” resources
from my book on debate groups to coach fellow cultural conservatives".
The quotation marks around moderate is in the original.
While most have swallowed the idea that Breivik was a counterjihadist,
his actual plan was to exploit tensions over Muslim terrorism, in
order to conduct a campaign of terrorism against European targets and
seize power with a more stable version of National Socialism.
Breivik was not a Nazi himself, for tactical reasons, because he
disagreed with Nazi expansionism. But his own plan called for the use
of WMD's in Europe and the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of
traitors. The echoes of the Turner Diaries are very obviously present
in his manifesto.
6. Anders Behring Breivik was a Political Terrorist
Breivik was not a member of a terrorist group, except in his own
fantasies. His plan was to carry out an attack and become the hero of
Europe. This is fairly typical lunacy. His plans were grandiose and
detached from reality.
His main target was a children's camp, his final notes are frenzied
and he mentions having his thinking clouded by steroid withdrawal.
Breivik did have a plan, but it is detached enough from reality that
it can hardly be called a serious political program. He did succeed in
killing a large number of people, but so have many other lunatics.
Nothing that Breivik did was the work of a sound mind.
Comparisons have been made to the Unabomber, but the Columbine killers
and numerous others also come to mind. Including Charles Manson.
Breivik's program was just as grandiose as Manson's, and just as
deluded. Both hoped that a serious of violent acts would touch off a
larger war that would enable them to take over.
Breivik is as much a political terrorist as Manson, and can no more be
considered part of any larger cause, beyond the malformed chemicals in
his own brain.

 Comparisons have been made to the Unabomber, but the Columbine killers
i Columbine killers erano  gli sfigati della scuola che si volevano
vendicare, Unabomber (che comunque viene da ben altra tradizione
politica) aveva un progetto politico.

 spiacente, ci sono
hai tagliato il punto 2, cretinetti
