Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Ron Paul to Haaretz: Israel can get by without American aid

Ron Paul to Haaretz: Israel can get by without American aid  
 
By Shmuel Rosner  
 
 
After an impressive showing in Iowa, the isolationist representative
should do well in the 'live free or die' state.  
 
The slight wound to Ron Paul's pride was visible as he recalled the
decision by Fox News not to invite him to yesterday's Republican debate,
but he hopes to gain even from his absence. "When there's an exclusion, it
energizes the supporters," Paul, a U.S. congressman from Texas, said.
He'll use the time freed up in his schedule for more appearances, more
speeches. He was in Nashua, New Hampshire, yesterday, speaking to the
Liberty Forum. No venue could be more fitting for this extraordinary
Republican candidate. He stood out from the field in Saturday night's ABC
news debate in Manchester, New Hampshire, particularly where U.S. foreign
policy is concerned. 
The Republican candidates are careful not to be too highly identified with
the administration that will be leaving office in a year. Still, when it
comes to terror and the war in Iraq, they give President George W. Bush
considerable credit. 
"The president got the big decision of his presidency right," Rudy
Giuliani said. He meant the decision to "go on the offense" against
terror. John McCain agreed, Mitt Romney agreed, Mike Huckabee agreed -
albeit with slightly less enthusiasm - and Fred Thompson noted that this
was a "global war." Afterward, the five began arguing with Paul, a
Republican candidate who blamed American foreign policy for inviting and
encouraging terror. 
 
Paul rejects the "isolationist" label, but it's difficult to describe his
positions in another manner. In Iowa he took 10 percent of the votes, way
ahead of Giuliani's 3 percent and slightly behind McCain's 13 percent. No
one believes he can win, but nevertheless in the final quarter of 2007, he
raised the amazing sum of nearly $20 million, allowing him to remain in
the race. The vast majority of the money came from hundreds of thousands
of people who each gave less than $100. Most of them are young - allowing
Paul to compare his draw to that of Democratic candidate Barack Obama -
and very devoted. In New Hampshire, a state whose citizens have a strong
tendency to believe that that government is best which governs least, and
are among the most anti-tax people in the country, Paul hopes to do well -
at least as well as he did in Iowa. 
The most interesting political question about Paul concerns whether he
will run as an independent after he loses the Republican nod. Paul refuses
to promise that he won't, and one can already hear how would frame an
independent run: "The investment was made by the supporters," he notes.
They gave the money, they'll decide what to do with it. In other words, if
they demand it, he will have no choice but to go forward. 
Paul made time for a brief conversation with Haaretz a few days ago, after
an appearance at Des Moines University, in Iowa. He spoke to students
before holding a short press conference, and then stopped to talk about
Israel a little. Much has already been written about Paul and Israel. Some
have accused him of being anti-Israel and have found anti-Semitic
sentiments among some of his supporters. A few of Paul's statements have
teetered on the thin line between sharp criticism and dangerous conspiracy
theories. For example: "The assumption is that AIPAC is in control of
things, and they control the votes, and they get everybody to vote against
anything that would diminish the [Iraq] war." 
Representatives of Israel in the U.S., who make a point of maintaining
contact with all of the candidates' campaign headquarters, have not
bothered much with Paul. What could they say to a candidate whose
supporters believe that Israel plays a central role in trying to provoke a
U.S.-Iran war? How much schmoozing could they do with those who want the
U.S. to get out of the Middle East? 
Still, Paul is polite to the Israeli nudnik attempting to trip him up:
"I'm not anti-Israel in any way," he says. Paul has no problem with the
idea of America's maintaining good trade relations with Israel, or with
with seeing Israeli tourists in the U.S. and vice versa. The suspicions
about him, he assumes, come from the fact that he opposes economic and
military aid to Israel. But, he stresses, it's not just Israel, it's any
country. In fact, Paul explains, Israel only stands to gain from his
position. "It's a good deal," he says, since when aid to Israel stops so
would the aid to all the Arab states currently enjoying American
patronage. It is true that Israel receives more than any of the Arab
states, but, Paul notes, it receives less than they do put together. "The
enemies would also be denied the money," he says. 
"I believe in the sovereignty of Israel," Paul says. If Israel stops
receiving U.S. aid, then it could do whatever it wants. If it wants peace,
then it will make peace. In any event, Paul is certain that "It will do
quite well." Israel doesn't really "need us." 
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it



