Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: a proposito di popoli inventati

Palestinian Arab nationalism effectively sprung out of thin air in
1920. Up until then, with very little exception, it was subsumed under
the desire to be a part of "Greater Syria" which would include all of
Palestine - and leave no room for a Jewish state.
 
As soon as the ink dried on the San Remo resolution, Palestinian Arab
leaders changed their tune, and embraced the idea of an Arab Palestine
that would, again, ensure that no Jewish state would ever exist.
 
After 1948, the desire for a Palestinian Arab state disappeared again.
Palestinian Arabs in the west bank of the Jordan became citizens of
that country; those in Gaza saw their land occupied by Egypt. Neither
of them showed the slightest interest in their own state - the desire
just disappeared.
 
What replaced it was a return to 1919's Syrian-style pan-Arabism, and
the person they believed could help them was Egypt's Gamal Abdel
Nasser.
 
Palestinians in Gaza in 1957 wanted to be under the administration of
Egypt - not to have their own country!
 
In fact, Jordan's King Hussein's major problem during that time was
the threat from Nasser, who incited Jordanian Palestinians to revolt
against him and even to assassinate him, so the entire Arab world
could be Nasserist.
 
What happened to their vaunted nationalism? Where was their desire for
an independent state that their leaders spoke about so eloquently
during the 1940s?
 
It is apparent that the desire for a state was far less than the
desire to destroy Israel, which was Nasser's selling point to them.
"Liberating Palestine" meant liberating it - from Jews.
 
The 1964 PLO Covenant is a very interesting document. Its Arabic name
is "Al-Mithaq Al-Kawmee Al-Philisteeni," which roughly means The
Palestinian Pan-Arabist Covenant. It is mostly wedded to the Nasserist
vision, insisting on how the Palestinian cause is a pan-Arab cause,
and it is replete with references to Arab unity and the Arab nation.
(It also specifically excludes Gaza and the West Bank from areas
wanted for "Palestine" - since those areas were considered
"liberated!" Significantly, it also refers to Israel's pre-1967
existence as "occupation.")
 
The 1968 version of the document, in contrast, is called "Al-Mithaq Al-
Watanee Al-Philisteeni" which more explicitly means "The Palestinian
National Covenant." Which means that only after 1967, when hopes for
an Arab military victory over Israel faded, did Palestinian Arab
nationalism become reincarnated.
 
We see that the Palestinian Arab leadership went from Greater Syrian
nationalism to Palestinian Arab nationalism to pan-Arab Nasserite
nationalism and then back to Palestinian Arab nationalism, all in the
course of fifty years.
 
All of those political movements boasted wonderfully written documents
and passionate speeches explaining why their cause was the only
logical, moral and legal means to justly deal with Palestinian Arabs.
There were no apparent cases of whiplash as people moved from one to
the next, contradictory political position. The reason is clear: all
those disparate movements had one thing in common, the eradication of
Jewish nationalism. Everything else was window dressing to put a
polite face on what is really a philosophy of hate.
 
And it continues today, as Palestinian Arabs are seemingly torn
between what appears to be completely different paths - the PLO's
stated methods of declarations and popular resistance, or Hamas' newly
stated method of embracing a strategy of stages that mimics Arafat's
1974 Phased Plan to destroy Israel, to Islamic Jihad's dedication to
nothing but armed resistance, to Hezbollah's single-minded goal of
utterly destroying Israel by any means possible. But in the end, they
are all paper-thin veneers on top of the same underlying goal - to
destroy Israel by whatever means makes the most sense at the moment.
 
Westerners cannot wrap their heads around the idea that an entire
national movement is really not interested in liberty and freedom for
their people, but rather is meant solely to destroy another people. It
is literally unbelievable that Arab leaders would hold millions of
people hostage simply to use them as human weapons against Israel. But
like it or not, it is the truth, and it is what needs to be understood
before any real progress can be made.
 
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2011/12/disappearance-and-reappearance-of.html
 

 Palestine - and leave no room for a Jewish state.
 
sì, va bene, i palestinesi non esistono, l'Italia è un'espressione
geografica e Israele no perchè gli ebrei si ripetono da 3000 anni che
un essere che non esiste gliel'ha promesso e i goim che notoriamente
pensano che non ci sia bisogno di interpretare ci credono. Adesso
parliamo d'altro.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/the_media_consensus_on_israel_is_collapsing/singleton/
 

 pensano che non ci sia bisogno di interpretare ci credono.
 
mai visto una martellata sui maroni arrivare con tale precisione.


 
Qui c'era il post di uno strafatto di porto e psolobicina che ignorava 
chi fosse il liberatore appiedato di Gerusalemme.
 
PP

 wrote:
 
Qui c'era il post di un alcolista che non ha mai sentito parlare della
conferenza di san remo. Grazie dei fior....