Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Il gas dello scorso Agosto a Damasco? Opera di Erdogan

 
Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels
 
http://www.lrb.co.uk/2014/04/06/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line
 
 
 
Tanto per chiarire chi sia il figlio di puttana ad Ankara.


Ovviamente ora aspettiamo Benito (pisciasotto) Analrich che ci farnetichi sopra.
 


che mare di fandonie...


Confuta con argomenti, oppure taci.
 
 
Exclusive: Defenders of the old conventional wisdom blaming the Syrian government for the Aug. 21 Sarin attack are going after investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, who implicates Syrian jihadists and Turkish intelligence. But the defenders are relying on long-discredited claims, says Robert Parry.
 
By Robert Parry
 
One shouldn’t be surprised, I guess, that some wannabe-journalist bloggers are auditioning before possible mainstream employers by attacking investigative journalist Seymour M. Hersh for writing a groundbreaking article implicating Syrian jihadist rebels and Turkish intelligence in the lethal use of Sarin on Aug. 21 outside Damascus.
 
From a sampling of these defenses of Official Washington’s old conventional wisdom – blaming the Syrian government – the chief attack line against Hersh is to repeat the initial U.S. government claim of a widespread strike involving multiple rockets.
 
The controversial map developed by Human Rights Watch and embraced by the New York Times, supposedly showing the flight paths of two missiles from the Aug. 21 Sarin attack intersecting at a Syrian military base.
The controversial map developed by Human Rights Watch and embraced by the New York Times, supposedly showing the flight paths of two missiles from the Aug. 21 Sarin attack intersecting at a Syrian military base.
The thinking then was that only the Syrian government had the capability to launch such a widespread assault. But this claim is outdated. The United Nations inspectors who fanned out across the Ghouta suburb of Damascus recovered only two suspicious rockets – and one was found to be clean of Sarin or any other chemical agent.
 
The one Sarin-laden rocket, which struck in the Zamalka/Ein Tarma neighborhood, was found to be crudely made and had a maximum range of about 2 to 3 kilometers, meaning that it would have been launched from rebel-controlled areas, not from a government zone.
 
But conventional wisdom is a difficult thing to shake once many “very important people” have embraced its certainties. Such VIPs don’t like to admit that they were suckered and there are always some aspiring operatives who hope to earn some brownie points by attacking anyone who deviates from the “group think.”
 
That’s what we’re seeing now as the Obama administration’s case against the Syrian government collapses, not that it was ever very sturdy. There is desperation across Official Washington to try to prop the old narrative back up.
 
The flimsiness of the administration’s indictment was always apparent. The U.S. “Government Assessment” of the attack, published Aug. 30, was a four-page white paper making unsubstantiated allegations against the Syrian government. No verifiable evidence was presented either then or since then.
 
The point of the “Government Assessment” itself was to avoid the standard requirement of a National Intelligence Estimate preceding a U.S. military assault on a sovereign country. NIEs represent the consensus view of the 16 intelligence agencies. NIEs also require inclusion of footnotes revealing any dissents.
 
I was told at the time that there was substantial concern within the U.S. intelligence community that we were witnessing another rush to judgment. Yet, to keep those doubts secret, the Obama administration cobbled together this new creation, a “Government Assessment,” that left out the dissents.
 
The small package of material released on Aug. 30 did, however, include one significant footnote attached to a map and offering an explanation for why there may have been an initial belief of a more widespread attack.
 
The footnote read: “Reports of chemical attacks originating from some locations may reflect the movement of patients exposed in one neighborhood to field hospitals and medical facilities in the surrounding area. They may also reflect confusion and panic triggered by the ongoing artillery and rocket barrage, and reports of chemical use in other neighborhoods.”
 
In other words, even the White House’s white-washing white paper offered a contradictory explanation to what the administration was claiming about the number of neighborhoods struck by the chemical attack of Aug. 21, i.e., victims from one location may have rushed to clinics in other neighborhoods, creating the false impression of a more widespread attack.
 
More significantly, however, the four-page “Government Assessment” of the case against the Syrian government contained not a single piece of evidence that could be checked independently. It was filled with “we assess” this and “we assess” that. To this day, the Obama administration has not released a shred of evidence that could be examined and evaluated.
 
Instead, the propaganda approach has been the old tactic of repeating an unproven assertion again and again, knowing that if a charge is declared with sufficient certitude often enough, the weak-minded will simply begin treating it as accepted wisdom. That’s especially easy when the target of the accusations has been thoroughly demonized as is the case with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
 


Coglione, impara a citare le fonti.
 

 Confuta con argomenti, oppure taci.
 
fandonie totali filorusse...

 fandonie totali filorusse...
 
Seymour Hersh filorusso? Uhmmm.
 
Carlo "Jurassic Park"
 
 

 > > > Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels
 
Sub minorato mentale fatti la ricerchina.
 


Dove, quando, perche'?
 
Impara a citare coglionazzo della razza inferiore.

 Impara a citare coglionazzo della razza inferiore.
 
Hoo ho polizia postale please un razzista incita all'odio razziale.
 
Benito tu cancellerai i tuoi di messaggi ma i replay restano, non scordarlo.
 


Oops, termine sbagliato - ti definivo della Specie Inferiore - un termine usato dalla BBC:
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12535647
 
 
Impara piuttosto a citare, inferiore.


semplicemente utile idiota

 
 
Too late coglionazzo, stanno arrivando a casa tua.
 
Chiama l'ambasciata.

Non rispondono all'ambasciata.
 
Posso chiedere asilo politico a Venezia, IYHO?

 Posso chiedere asilo politico a Venezia, IYHO?
 
No non abbiamo manincomi adatti.
 
L'ultimo lo hanno chiuso dopo la morte della moglie segreta di Benito.
Attento Benito, Benito 1 ha fatto morire in manincomio suo figlio e sua madre
 
Non farti vedere in laguna.


Hei coglionazzo della razza superiore.
Pare che i criminali della razza superiore tua ci stiano riprovando col gas.
 
Cos'e' ne avete fatto troppo e non sapete dove buttarlo?