Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: lezioncina per Logi e Tondelli

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/22/be-clear-antisemitism-is-a-hate-apart
 
 
Let’s be clear – antisemitism is a hate apart
 
Non basta dire "io non penso che gli ebrei siano inferiori" per non essere antisemiti. 


Beh, ormai nessuno, nemmeno i neonazi pensano che gli ebrei siano inferiori. Anzi, loro sono i primi ad ammettere che gli ebrei sono intelligenti, e per tale motivo sono un pericolo.

 Beh, ormai nessuno, nemmeno i neonazi pensano che gli ebrei siano inferiori. 
 
ma capita ancora di leggere/sentire "io non sono razzista, per me tutti sono uguali, quindi non posso essere antisemita"
e, opportunamente, Jacobson ricorda che:
 
To assert that antisemitism is unlike other racisms is not to claim a privilege for it. Hating a Jew is no worse than hating anyone else. But while many a prejudice is set off by particular circumstance – the rise in an immigrant population or a locally perceived threat – antisemitism is, as often as not, unprompted, exists outside time and place and doesn’t even require the presence of Jews to explain it.


Alcuni razzismi sono più razzisti egli altri....:-))))


The part played by Jews in the evolution of Christianity has much to do with this. In the popular imagination, the Jew is the killer of Christ. To a philosopher like Nietzsche, the Jew is culpable not for rejecting Christianity but for inventing it. For cultures unable to make up their minds, whether they are heathen or Christian – remember those demonstrations of Teutonic paganism on the streets of Christian Germany 80 years ago – the Jew fits the bill of villain twice.
 
If the Jew transmogrified into the Devil for the medieval church, he retained his devilish characteristics as Christian sentiment found other places to express itself, early socialism being one of them. Weighted down with his Judas moneybags, rootless, usurous, conspiratorial and believing himself to be “chosen”, the Jew glided seamlessly into the demonology of the left. Not always, it should be said, without his own connivance. Many Jews have found one or other version of socialism compatible with their religious faith, while others have been quick to embrace a secular system in whose name they can jettison that faith altogether. The presence of a Jew in any movement no more guarantees it to be innocent of antisemitism than guilty. And that applies to anti-Zionism, too. Anti-Zionist Jews exist, but that tells one nothing about anti-Zionism.
 
It is here, in the matter of the existence of the state of Israel, that all the ancient superstitions about Jews find a point of confluence. We dance around this subject, afraid to confront it full on. But it has to be addressed: partly because all that has been thought about Jews in the past has a home in what we think about Israel now and partly because it is axiomatic to Labour that Zionism is a racist ideology – from which it follows that anti-Zionism cannot be called racist; we will not fix antisemitism, in the Labour party or anywhere else, until we fix Israel. I don’t mean fix its problems, I mean fix the way we talk about it.

 Let's be clear
 
Siamo chiari: uno come rabbi Zanardo che apostrofa i goyim come
"poverini" e suggerisce che i palestinesi emigrino "altrove",
preferibilmente in Cile, è l'ultima persona che può impartire lezioni in
materia di razzismo. 
 
Quando vorremo ascoltare gli improbabili sermoni di rabbi Zanardo, ci
iscriveremo alla sua sinagoga. Ma è molto, molto improbabile. Nel
frattempo sermoni e lezioncine li rifili ai suoi parrocchiani, se sono
tanto grulli da starlo a sentire.
 
 
 
-- 
"E maledetto sia Haman, archivista o insegnante che tu sia. Lechaim!"
(rabbi Andrea Zanardo)

 Siamo chiari
 
l articolo di cui sopra e' di Hpward Jacobson. Evidentemente ti ha fatto incazzare. In effetti, fa incazzare tutti quelli che vorrebbero vedere Israele scomparire.