Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Army recruits who get in despite bad conduct promoted faster

Army recruits who get in despite bad conduct promoted faster
AP Exclusive: Recruits who get in despite bad conduct promoted faster,
stay longer
LOLITA C. BALDOR
AP News
Apr 29, 2008 15:44 EST
Soldiers who need special waivers to get into the Army because of bad
behavior go AWOL more often and face more courts-martial. But they also
get promoted faster and re-enlist at a higher rate, according to an
internal military study obtained by The Associated Press.
The Army study late last year concluded that taking a chance on a
well-screened applicant with a criminal, bad driving or drug record
usually pays off. And both the Army and the Marines have been bringing in
more recruits with blemished records. Still, senior leaders have called
for additional studies, to help determine the impact of the waivers on the
Army.
"We believe that so far the return outweighs the risk," said Army Col.
Kent M. Miller, who headed the team that conducted the study.
The information has not been released to the public, but the AP obtained a
copy of the study.
The statistics show that recruits with criminal records or other drug and
alcohol issues have more discipline problems than those without records.
Those recruits also are a bit more likely to drop out of the Army because
of alcohol.
On the brighter side, those with waivers earn more medals for valor and
tend to stay in the Army longer.
In a key finding, the study said that nearly one in five — or 19.5 percent
— of the soldiers who needed waivers to join the Army failed to complete
the initial term of enlistment, which could be from two to six years. That
percentage is just a bit higher than the 17 percent washout rate for those
who didn't need a waiver to get in.
About 1 percent of those with waivers appeared before courts-martial,
compared with about 0.7 percent of those without waivers.
Overall, soldiers with waivers appear more committed to their service once
they get in. Statistics show they tend to stay in the Army longer and
re-enlist at higher rates. Also, infantry soldiers with waivers were
promoted to sergeant in an average of about 35 months, compared with 39
months for those without waivers.
The Army study compared the performance of soldiers who came in with
conduct waivers against those who did not during the years 2003-2006.
In that time, 276,231 recruits enlisted in the Army with no prior military
service. Of those 6.5 percent, or nearly 18,000 had waivers.
In a comparison of both groups the study found that soldiers who had
received waivers for bad behavior:
_ Had a higher desertion rate (4.26 percent vs. 3.23 percent).
_ Had a higher misconduct rate (5.95 percent vs. 3.55 percent).
_ Had a higher rate of appearances before courts-martial (1 percent vs.
0.71 percent).
_ Had a higher dropout rate for alcohol rehabilitation failure (0.27
percent vs. 0.12 percent).
But they also:
_ Were more likely to re-enlist (28.48 percent vs. 26.76 percent).
_ Got promoted faster to sergeant (after 34.7 months vs. 39 months).
_ Had a lower rate of dismissal for personality disorders (0.93 percent
vs. 1.12 percent).
_ Had a lower rate of dismissal for unsatisfactory performance (0.26
percent vs. 0.48 percent).
Waivers have been a controversial issue for the military in recent months,
with the news that the Army and Marine Corps have increased their use of
the exemptions to bring in more recruits with criminal records than ever
before.
The Army and the Marine Corps are under pressure to attract recruits as
they struggle to increase their size in order to meet the combat needs of
war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The last time the active-duty Army missed its recruiting goal was 2005.
Last year it set a target of 80,000 recruits and signed up 80,410. It is
shooting for another 80,000 this year.
Some critics outside the Defense Department say the military is lowering
its standards in order to fill its ranks. And lower-level officers have
raised concerns with their leaders that the trend may trigger an increase
in disciplinary problems within their units.
Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, asked the Pentagon recently for more data on troops who receive
conduct waivers.
He said he recognizes "the importance of providing opportunities to
individuals who have served their sentences and rehabilitated themselves."
But he also noted concerns that the practice could be undermining military
readiness.
Army officials say getting a waiver is a long and difficult process,
particularly for those who have been convicted of a serious offense.
Serious offenders have their records reviewed and must get approval from
as many as nine different analysts and officers — up to the rank of
general.
Gen. William Wallace, commander of the Army's Training and Doctrine
Command at Fort Monroe, Va., dismisses the notion that waivers are
creating more disciplinary problems in today's Army.
Instead, he said, when the Army brings in a young person who made a
mistake and got past it, most likely "they will be a better person for
having made that mistake and learned from it, than perhaps somebody who
didn't make the mistake and didn't have the opportunity to learn."
Wallace speaks from experience.
As a teen he was taken into custody in his hometown of Louisville, Ky.,
when — as he put it — "I took an expensive baseball and put it in a
not-so-expensive baseball box, and tried to check out with it."
He remembers the black and white police car pulling up, loading his and
his friend's bicycles in the back and taking him downtown to the station
where his father had to pick him up.
He laid out the sobering experience on his application for West Point
several years later and, he recalled this week, "somebody looked at that
application and said 'he apparently learned something from the experience
and we'll give him an opportunity.'"
Wallace, a four-star general whose chest full of awards now includes two
Distinguished Service medals, five Legion of Merit awards and an Army
Commendation Medal for valor, said the Army has an obligation to give
young people a second chance to make something of themselves.
"I am less concerned about the raw material that we receive than I am
about the product that we produce," he said.
___
On the Net:
Defense Department: 
http://www.defenselink.mil
Source: AP News 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
 
http://www.larinascita.org
http://www.italia-cuba.it/associazione/associazione.htm
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 Wallace, a four-star general
Fammi indovinare... fascista?
-- 
 Bak [ ICQ 13249673 ]
"Orwell was an optimist"
  Kibo