Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Utilità dell'antrace

http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7312
September 19, 2005
Covering the Tracks of the Anthrax Attacks
What, where, why - who?
by Justin Raimondo
Four years ago today, letters containing anthrax were postmarked from
Trenton, N.J., to five major American media outlets, including ABC News, NBC
News, CBS News, the New York Post, and AMI Media, a publisher of supermarket
tabloids. Thus began a series of attacks over several weeks that terrorized
the nation, infected 22 people, killed five - and played a key role in
amplifying the post-9/11 hysteria and paranoia that took the nation on a
course set for war.
Three weeks after the first mailings, two letters containing highly
weaponized anthrax - far more deadly than the relatively crude concoction
contained in the first letters - showed up in the offices of two Democratic
senators, Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy. The Capitol emptied, most members
of Congress fled Washington, and the country - already jumpy as a result of
the 9/11 terrorist attacks - was practically prostrate with fear.
Remember how the War Party used these attacks to stoke up sentiment for
attacking Iraq? Andrew Sullivan declared:
"At this point, it seems to me that a refusal to extend the war to Iraq is
not even an option. We have to extend it to Iraq. It is by far the most
likely source of this weapon; it is clearly willing to use such weapons in
the future; and no war against terrorism of this kind can be won without
dealing decisively with the Iraqi threat. We no longer have any choice in
the matter. Slowly, incrementally, a Rubicon has been crossed. The
terrorists have launched a biological weapon against the United States. They
have therefore made biological warfare thinkable and thus repeatable. We
once had a doctrine that such a Rubicon would be answered with a nuclear
response. We backed down on that threat in the Gulf War but Saddam didn't
dare use biological weapons then. Someone has dared to use them now. Our
response must be as grave as this new threat."
Nuke 'em!, said Andy - without a single iota of evidence that Iraq was
involved. But who needs evidence? That's soooo September 10th. Everything's
changed, we were told: we don't require evidence, not anymore. All we need
are vaguely portentous phrases, such as "a Rubicon has been crossed." We can
make up the rest as we go along.
Over at the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol was gleefully rubbing his hands
together and cackling that the administration seemed finally to have signed
on to the neocon prescription for taking the "war on terrorism" beyond
Afghanistan, to Iraq:
"Has the administration come around thanks to repeated efforts at persuasion
by The Weekly Standard (and a few other hawks)? Perhaps. But a likelier
explanation is that they have come to believe we'll have to take the war
beyond Afghanistan - to Iraq and other state sponsors of terror - because
they've found evidence of support by 'other states' for very recent and
sinister bin Laden-related activities.
"What if the anthrax cases in Florida are an act of terrorism? What if the
presence of the anthrax spores there is connected to the fact that a few of
the September 11 terrorists, led by Mohammed Atta, lived within a few miles?
What if Atta - or some other bin Laden operative - had access to anthrax
from the terrorist-sponsoring country that we know has a long record of
developing anthrax as a biological weapon, Iraq?"
Unlike the more emotive Sullivan - for whom evidence of an Iraq connection
would only be an unnecessary drag on his breathy imprecations - the
cool-headed Kristol came up with a scenario meant to convince the reader
that such a connection was at least possible. It involved the now famous -
and decidedly disproved - meeting between Mohammed Atta and an alleged Iraqi
intelligence agent in Prague. Although the Czech police denied it, the myth
persisted, and grew: not only did Atta plan the 9/11 terrorist attacks in
collaboration with Iraqi intelligence on his trip to Prague, he also -
according to Kristol and James "World War IV" Woolsey - hatched the anthrax
plot. However, given that this mythical meeting, conducted in the course of
six busy hours, was alleged to have taken place at the Prague airport, and
was conducted within range of security cameras, one wonders if passing vials
of anthrax under such circumstances might have proven somewhat problematic.
Oh well, the War Party didn't need especially logical arguments in stoking
the fires of American rage: the smoke had yet to lift from downtown
Manhattan, and the victims of the Twin Towers and Pentagon attacks were
still being counted. As anthrax panic gripped the nation, the White House
was preparing to extend the war to "other countries" - a prospect Kristol &
Co. found thrilling. If the administration wouldn't bow to the bellicose
blandishments of the Weekly Standard, then perhaps they would bend before
the amplified fear of terrorism raised by the anthrax attacks.
And so they did.
In retrospect, outrage and fear generated by the anthrax attacks were
essential elements of the propaganda campaign designed to link Iraq to
terrorism in the U.S. and drag us into war. The attacks were so propitious
in this regard that one might be forgiven for wondering if the perpetrators
had this as their intention. Certainly they took great pains to convey the
impression that the postal pestilence was authored by angry Arabs of one
sort or another.
Also, in retrospect, the investigation into the anthrax mystery seems
remarkably botched, a kind of pre-Katrina premonition of a dangerous - even
criminal - incompetence. The authorities quickly seized on one Steven J.
Hatfill, a government scientist and a somewhat hapless figure, against whom
not a single shred of solid evidence could be marshaled. Yet Hatfill was
branded a "person of interest" and relentlessly harassed by government
agents, who - in collaboration with a certain New York Times columnist -
destroyed his reputation. U.S. government agents followed him everywhere,
made his life a misery, and refuse to this day to either apologize or offer
some small compensation to a man whose life they have ruined.
It is interesting that the U.S. government was all too eager to follow the
path suggested by journalists such as Nicholas Kristof, one of Hatfill's
earliest and most relentless nemeses, while studiously ignoring the clues
provided by others. The Hartford Courant ran a series of articles by Dave
Altimari, Lynne Tuohy, and Jack Dolan that not only pointed in the direction
of the possible perpetrators, but named names and implied a
political-ideological motive behind the crime.
The anthrax strain has been positively identified as being of the Ames
variety, of the sort stored at USAMRIID, the U.S. government biological
weapons facility at Fort Detrick, Md., and a few other such labs. Soon after
the anthrax attacks, the Courant exposed the weird problems besetting the
Ft. Detrick facility, which had apparently been missing large quantities of
biological toxins, including not only anthrax but also hanta virus, Ebola
virus, and other lethal pathogens. These mysterious disappearances
apparently occurred:
"During a turbulent period of labor complaints and recriminations among
rival scientists there, documents from an internal Army inquiry show. The
1992 inquiry also found evidence that someone was secretly entering a lab
late at night to conduct unauthorized research, apparently involving
anthrax. A numerical counter on a piece of lab equipment had been rolled
back to hide work done by the mystery researcher, who left the misspelled
label 'antrax' in the machine's electronic memory, according to the
documents obtained by The Courant."
This "mystery researcher" may have been someone at the very center of that
"turbulent period," one Philip Zack. Zack and a group of personnel at Ft.
Detrick had been systematically harassing an Egyptian co-worker, Dr. Ayaad
Assaad. The Courant reports:
"Documents from the inquiry show that one unauthorized person who was
observed entering the lab building at night was Langford's predecessor, Lt.
Col. Philip Zack, who at the time no longer worked at Fort Detrick. A
surveillance camera recorded Zack being let in at 8:40 p.m. on Jan. 23,
1992, apparently by Dr. Marian Rippy, a lab pathologist and close friend of
Zack's, according to a report filed by a security guard."
The harassment of Assaad, detailed here, took on bizarrely juvenile forms:
an obscene poem, a rubber camel delivered to his mailbox, a constant stream
of racist anti-Arab remarks such as one might find posted these days on
Little Green Footballs. Court documents reveal a harrowing experience of
cruel and relentless persecution carried out by a small clique, including
Zack, who called themselves the "camel club."
While the anthrax letters received enormous publicity, one mailed missive
that might provide a key clue to the identity of the perpetrators has
received very little: an anonymous letter, sent in late September before the
anthrax drama unfolded, to the military police at the Marine base in
Quantico, Va., accused Dr. Assaad of being behind a terrorist plot to
unleash biological horrors in American cities. The author revealed a
detailed knowledge of Dr. Assaad's career at USAMRIID and claimed to have
formerly worked with him.
Assaad was interrogated by the FBI on Oct. 3, then let go after the letter
was determined to be a hoax. When the effects of the anthrax attacks began
to make themselves known, the full horror of what had happened began to dawn
on Assaad - but not, apparently, on the authorities. Says Assaad: "My theory
is, whoever this person is knew in advance what was going to happen (and
created) a suitable, well-fitted scapegoat for this action." The odd timing
of the letter - sent after the anthrax letters were mailed, but before their
deadly contents were known - certainly seems to point in this direction. The
Courant reports FBI spokesman Chris Murray saying "the FBI is not tracking
the source of the anonymous letter, despite its curious timing, coming a
matter of days before the existence of anthrax-laced mail became known."
Instead of following the trail of this important clue, investigators went
off on a tangent with the Hatfill angle, which proved [.pdf] to be a dead
end.
An Egyptian scientist, albeit one who is an American citizen and had lived
in this country for quite some time, had been set up as the scapegoat for
the crime - before knowledge of the mailed anthrax was generally known. This
same scientist had been the object of a hate campaign generated by
virulently anti-Arab co-workers at Ft. Detrick, at least one of whom was
videotaped surreptitiously entering the lab at night (after he had been
dismissed from his position and was not authorized to enter in any event).
Whoever wrote the poison pen letter denouncing Dr. Assaad as a potential
terrorist in all likelihood knows something about the origins of the anthrax
attack. In this context, the crudeness of the messages accompanying the
anthrax - "death to America" and "death to Israel" - seems like an obvious
effort to divert attention away from the real authors of a crime that goes
unsolved to this day.
Just as the Bush administration was looking for an excuse - any excuse - to
take out after Iraq, the anthrax horror reared its head and silenced any
remaining opposition to the war plans of this administration, at least
momentarily. It all seems like such a terribly convenient coincidence. In
retrospect, it was as much a part of the vortex of fearmongering that sucked
us into war as tales of Iraqi WMD palmed off by Ahmed Chalabi's "heroes in
error" and the extravagant effusions of Dick Cheney and Condoleezza Rice.
No, I am not suggesting that the U.S. government or the Bush administration
carried out these attacks: yet whoever did surely had in mind making it
easier for the War Party to unleash mass death and destruction in the Middle
East, a veritable wave of hate that would carry us to Baghdad and beyond.
Why isn't Congress investigating this? Where is the probe into the
"intelligence failure" that managed to target and destroy an innocent person
while pulling investigators away from evidence pointing in a more plausible
direction? Whoever pulled off the anthrax attacks is still out there,
waiting for the right moment to strike. This is a case that must be solved -
because there's more where that came from.

