Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: ancora sui matrimoni misti (lo so che Logi legge)

Quella casinista di Julie Burchill ha pubblicato le sue memorie, in cui parla dell'amore appassionato che lei prova per il popolo ebraico (ha pure cercato di convertirsi, ma ci e' rimasta male perche' la rabbina era troppo filo-islamica per i suoi gusti)
Ha comunque aperto un dibattito sul filo-semitismo. Poteva mancare la giornalista del Guardian, ebrea di quelle presentabili per il Guardian, che mette in guardia dal troppo amore per Israele da parte dei non ebrei. Oh che mondo migliore sarebbe se tutti ci odiassero come ai bei tempi.
Arriva adesso il contributo di Louise Mench, una signora cattolica che ha sposato un ebreo.
 
Da leggere. Anche per te, Logi 
 
http://www.thejc.com/node/125525
 
 
I didn't marry Peter because he was Jewish. My first husband wasn't. But it helped. Always theologically curious, I read my entire Bible as a girl, so that was a start. I noticed, growing up, that a massive amount of the businesspeople I admired happened to be Jewish. I started paying attention to the culture of Judaism - its reverence for education, in particular, and study.
I am very ambitious myself and met many driven and able people who were Jewish. As a Catholic - with our canon law and encyclicals and rituals - the debates that were part of my faith were also part of Judaism. Culturally, I felt there was a big similarity. "We're the two great guilt religions," as one Jewish boyfriend once said to me. Of course, he also said "shiksas are for practice" right before I dumped him, so I'm not trying to pretend every Jewish boy is a saint, no pun intended.
Judaism, and Jewish culture, also attracted me because of its differences to me. "But why are you a Democrat?" I wailed to Peter as a young woman. "You're successful!"
American Jews were relentlessly left-wing and I was a Tory. I'm more pro-Israel than Peter. To deny the legitimacy of non-Jews liking and admiring Jews is basically to deny the legitimacy of seeing anything we can argue is distinctly Jewish. And I'm confident that's wrong.
Lastly, Freeman and others on Twitter laughed because I hadn't heard of Theodore Herzl, founder of modern Zionism, and said (and still believe) that use of the word "Zionist" on Twitter is antisemitic.
I stand by that - it is. Whatever it used to mean, "Zionist" is now the universal antisemite's code for "Jews". "I hate the dirty Zionists," they will say, and look to get a pass.
No.As for Herzl, no I haven't heard of him and I know basically nothing about Golda
Meir either. I don't know much of the history of Israel and I am also weak on
the history of Sweden and can't tell you much, frankly, about Chile either.
What has that to do with liking Jews and Judaism? Nothing; one's a culture that I find immensely appealing and a faith I think is beautiful, a faith I once considered converting to when I had doubts, now dissolved, about my own.
So Hadley, bubbah, wind your neck in. I wound up with a guy named Mensch. Somebody up there likes me back.

 "shiksas are for practice"
 
carina, questa me la appunto
 


anche questa non e' male
---
"Zionist" is now the universal antisemite's code for "Jews". "I hate the dirty Zionists," they will say, and look to get a pass. 
---
sei antisionista, Luca Logi? 

 > > "shiksas are for practice"
 
 
 
What if Zionists are for practice?


Vabbè, vabbè, what if Zionists were for practice? altrimenti chissà
quanto ci ricama sopra


well, they are, in politics. Guess what, they win.