Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: also sprach Hitler

Congressman Paul, can we go back to the Middle East? You have said the
United States should not be trying to broker peace between the
Israelis and the Palestinians. Should the president even be there
today, sir?
REP. PAUL: Well, if you followed my advice, yes, we - we wouldn't be
there. We've been doing that for a good many years and it hasn't
seemed to come to success. No, I think if we weren't there there''d be
more incentives to come to a peaceful agreement. We support both
sides, you know, not only with the Palestinians but the Lebanese and
all the Arab nations. We support Israel, and we try to have this
balance. I think it'd be much better to have a balance by being out of
there, and I think there would be a greater incentive for Israel and
the Palestinian and all the Arab nations to come together and talk
because I think we get in the way too often of these, and besides it's
costing us a lot of money, it's costing us lives now, and it's time
that we come to the point where we believe the world can solve some of
their problems without us.
And also we're out of money. We can't do it any longer. We're going
bankrupt, and the empires of the world have always ended badly through
economic terms. So whether there are peace agreements over there - I
mean, for instance if we would stop all aid over there we would stop
three times as much aid as Israel gets to the Arab nations.
Why do we arm the Arab nations and they're the enemies of Israel? But
we continue to do that. So why don't we trade with everybody and talk
with them, and there's a greater incentive to work these problems out.
I think if we'd have been out of there a lot sooner there may well
have been a much different settlement after the Kuwait invasion
because Israel was quite capable of working with moderate Arab
nations. They tried to. None of the Arab nations wanted Saddam Hussein
in Kuwait, and I think they could have taken care of Saddam
Hussein back then and save all the mess that we have now because I
think there are so many unintended consequences and way too much
blowback. (Applause.)
In many ways, we treat Israel as a stepchild. We do not give them the
responsibility that they deserve. We undermine their national
sovereignty. We don't let them design their own peace treaties with
their neighbors. And then we turn around and say that when you want to
do that, or you want to defend your borders, they have to check it out
with us.
I think Israel would be a lot safer. I made the point earlier. We give
three times as much money to the Arabs. Why do we arm their enemies?
So if you care about Israel, you should be against all the weapons
that go to the Arab nations. (Cheers, applause.)
And I just don't see any purpose in not treating Israel in an adult
fashion. I think they would be a lot better off. I think they, one
time in the '80s, took care of a nuclear reactor in Iraq. I stood up
and defended Israel for this. Nobody else did at that time.
But we need to recognize: They deserve their sovereignty, just as we
deserve our sovereignty. I believe if they assume more responsibility,
there would be more peace there, and that there would be a lot less
threat. Besides, we don't have any money to do this. (Cross talk,
cheers, applause.)
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1199964909352&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
per quel poco che mi ricordo, non mi pare di aver letto nulla di
simile nel Mein Kampf (questa edizione, 
http://www.kaosedizioni.com/schgalli_meinkampf.htm
,
l'unica seria in italiano, col commento di Giorgio Galli che
contestualizza i deliri di Hitler, non le edizioni scamuffe prefate
dai neonazi che lo esaltano...)

 antisemita.
beh, Ron Paul non dice solo di isolarsi, dice anche che non si devono
vendere armi ai nemici di Israele, che non è proprio una tesi
antisemita, eh....e oggi non siamo nel 1940, quando gli ebrei erano
sotto ben altri pericoli....