Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Alan M. Dershowitz - The Hamas War Crime Strategy

As Israel persists in its military efforts—by ground, air and sea—to
protect its citizens from deadly Hamas rockets, and as protests
against Israel increase around the world, the success of the
abominable Hamas double war crime strategy becomes evident.  The
strategy is as simple as it is cynical: provoke Israel by playing
Russian roulette with its children, firing rockets at kindergartens,
playgrounds and hospitals; hide behind its own civilians when firing
at Israeli civilians; refuse to build bunkers for its own civilians;
have the TV cameras ready to transmit every image of dead
Palestinians, especially children; exaggerate the number of civilians
killed by including as "children" Hamas fighters who are 16 or 17
years old and as "women," female terrorists.
Hamas itself has a name for this.  They call it "the CNN
strategy" (this is not to criticize CNN or any other objective news
source for doing its job; it is to criticize Hamas for exploiting the
freedom of press which it forbids in Gaza).  The CNN strategy is
working because decent people all over the world are naturally
sickened by images of dead and injured children.  When they see such
images repeatedly flashed across TV screens, they tend to react
emotionally.  Rather than asking why these children are dying and who
is to blame for putting them in harms way, the average viewer,
regardless of their political or ideological perspective, wants to see
the killing stopped.  They blame those whose weapons directly caused
the deaths, rather than those who provoked the violence by
deliberately targeting civilians.  They forget the usual rules of
morality and law.  For example, when a murderer takes a hostage and
fires from behind his human shield, and a policeman, in an effort to
stop the shooting accidentally kills the hostage, the law of every
country holds the hostage taker guilty of murder even though the
policeman fired the fatal shot.  The same is true of the law of war.
The use of human shields, in the way Hamas uses the civilian
population of Gaza, is a war crime—as is its firing of rockets at
Israeli civilians.  Every human shield that is killed by Israeli self
defense measures is the responsibility of Hamas, but you wouldn’t know
that from watching the media coverage.
The CNN strategy seems to work better, at least in some parts of the
world, against Israel that it would against other nations.  There are
many more protests—and fury—directed against Israel when it
inadvertently kills fewer than 100 civilians in a just war of self
defense, than against Arab and Muslim nations and groups that
deliberately kill far more civilians for no legitimate reason.  It
isn't the nature of the victims, since more Arabs and Muslim civilians
are killed every day in Africa and the Mid East by Arab and Muslim
governments and groups with little or no protests.  (For example, on
the first day of Israel’s ground attack, approximately 30
Palestinians, almost all Hamas combatants, were killed. On the same
day an Islamic suicide bomber blew herself up in a mosque in Iraq,
killing 40 innocent Muslims.  No protests.  Little media coverage.)
It isn't the nature of the killings, since Israel goes to
extraordinary lengths to avoid killing civilians—if for no other
reason than that it hurts their cause—while Hamas does everything in
its power to force Israel to kill Palestinian civilians by firing its
missiles from densely populated civilian areas and refusing to build
shelters for its civilians.  It isn't the nature of the conflict,
because Israel is fighting a limited war of self defense designed to
protect its own civilians from rocket attacks, while most of those
killed by Arabs and Muslims are killed in genocidal and tribal warfare
with no legitimate aim.  The world simply doesn't seem to care when
Arabs and Muslims kill large numbers of other Arabs and Muslims, but a
qualitatively different standard seems to apply when the Jewish state
kills even a relatively small number of Muslims and Arabs in a war of
self defense.
The international community doesn't even seem to care when Palestinian
children are killed by rocket fire—unless it is from Israeli rockets.
The day before the recent outbreak, Hamas fired an anti-personnel
rocket at Israeli civilians but the rocket fell short of its target
and killed two Palestinian girls.  Yet there was virtually no coverage
and absolutely no protests against these "collateral" civilian
deaths.  Hamas refused to allow TV cameras to show these dead
Palestinian children, who were killed by their own rockets. Nor have
there been protests against the cold blooded murders by Hamas and its
supporters of dozens of Palestinian civilians who allegedly
"collaborated” withIsrael.  Indeed Hamas and Fatah have killed far
more Palestinian civilians over the past several years than have the
Israeli, but you wouldn't know that from the media, the United Nations
or protesters who focus selectively on only those deaths caused by
Israeli military actions.
The protestors who fill the streets of London, Paris and San Francisco
were nowhere to be seen when hundreds of Jewish children were murdered
by Palestinian terrorists over the years.
Moreover, the number of civilians killed by Israel is almost always
exaggerated.  First, it widely assumed that if a victim is a "child"
or a "woman", he or she is necessarily a civilian. Consider the
following report in Thursday’s NY Times: "Hospital officials in Gaza
said that of the more than 390 people killed by Israeli fighter planes
since Saturday, 38 were children and 25 women.”  Some of these
children and women were certainly civilians but others were equally
certainly combatants: Hamas often uses 14, 15, 16 and 17 year olds as
well as women as terrorists.  Israel is entitled, under international
law, to treat these children and women as the combatants they have
become.  Hamas cannot, out of one side of its mouth, boast that it
recruits children and women to become terrorists, and then, out of the
other side of its mouth, complain when Israel takes them at their
word.  The media should look closely and critically at the number of
claimed civilian victims before accepting self-serving and self-
contradictory exaggerations.
By any objective count, the number of genuinely innocent civilians
killed by the Israeli Air Force in Gaza is lower than the collateral
deaths caused by any nation in a comparable situation.  Hamas does
everything in its power to provoke Israel into killing as many
Palestinian civilians as possible, in order to generate condemnation
against the Jewish state. They have gone so far as firing rockets from
Palestinian schoolyards and hiding their terrorists in Palestinian
maternity wards.  Lest there be any doubt about the willingness of
Hamas to expose their families to martyrdom, remember that the Hamas
terrorist leader recently killed in an Israeli air attack sent his own
son to be a suicide bomber and then refused to allow his family to
leave their house even after learning that he and his house had been
placed on the list of military targets.
Nor is this double standard - applied to Israel on the one hand, and
Arab and Muslim nations and groups on the other hand - limited to the
current situation in Gaza.  It has provided an excuse for the
international community to remain silent in the face of massive human
rights violations including genocides perpetrated by Arabs and Muslims
around the world for years. Many of those who protest Israeli self-
defense actions remain silent in the face of real genocides—such as
that in Darfur.
The reality is that the elected and de facto government of Gaza has
declared war against Israel.  Under Article 51 of the United Nations
Charter, they have committed an “armed attack” against the Jewish
state.  The Hamas charter calls for Israel’s total destruction. Under
international law, Israel is entitled to take whatever military action
is necessary to repel that attack and stop the rockets.  It must seek
to minimize civilian deaths consistent with the legitimate military
goal, and it is doing precisely that, despite Hamas efforts to
maximize civilian deaths on both sides.
The best outcome for purposes of producing peace would be the
destruction or substantial weakening of Hamas, which rejects the two-
state solution.  Israel and the Palestinian Authority could then agree
on a peace that would end both the Israeli occupation and the
rocketing of Israeli civilians.
----
"le maledizioni nei confronti dei cristiani (non ricordo il testo
esatto" (Luca Logi / rodewalder)
cfr 
http://raionim.blogspot.com/2008/12/luca-logi-e-i-piselli.html

 abominable Hamas double war crime strategy becomes evident.
di fronte a facce di culo del genere c'è pure chi ha il coraggio di
lamentarsi se si postano le foto dei bambini sterminati dall'IDF?

 di fronte a facce di culo del genere
Dershowitz non era quello a favore della tortura?
-- 
Luca Logi - Firenze - Italy        e-mail: 
ll...@dada.it
   Home page: 
http://www.angelfire.com/ar/archivarius
                   (musicologia pratica)

 Dershowitz non era quello a favore della tortura?
immagino anche nahum, visto che è noto che nelle carceri israeliane si
torturano regolarmente i detenuti palestinesi "prelevati" nella
"libera" Gaza e nei TO e mai sottoposti a processo. Ben 9000. MA tutto
il mondo è in pena per Shalit.

 Dershowitz non era quello a favore della tortura?
Caro amico,
non ti sbagli. Ma se la similitudine di questo azzeccagarbugli di Nuova 
Amsterdam con il braccio secolare si fermano qui,
in effetti c'č molto di piů. L'aschenazita Norman Finkelstein al riguardo ha 
stilato un pamphelet rivelatore, ahimč che io sappia
mai tradotto nella lingua del Sommo Poeta. Gli anglofoni, se lo volessero 
visto che il volume non č nell'Indice dei Libri Proibiti, possono rivolgersi 
qui:
http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Chutzpah-Misuse-Anti-Semitism-History/dp/0520245989
 


Come al solito, Giovanni dimostra di avere capito tutto.
Del resto, è la gente come lui il migliore bersaglio delle
manipolazioni mediatiche del terrorismo islamico.


i crimini dell'esercito israeliano non sono manipolazioni mediatiche,

 mai tradotto nella lingua del Sommo Poeta.
E' nella BUR, testa di cazzo, informati
F.


Sono il risultato di autentiche trappole tese da Hamas per ottenere
vittime civili da dare in pasto alle TV di tutto il mondo.


uh, poveri soldati israeliani, dei pirla che si lasciano menare per il
naso da Hamas...
la teoria del soldato bambino fa da pendant con quella del nemico
terrorista a prescindere. In guerra si fanno prigionieri, se li fanno
i terroristi non sono prigionieri, sono rapimenti...

 E' nella BUR
sta parlando di Beyond Chutzpah, che non è stato mai tradotto, anche
perchè è una demolizione sistematica delle palle a getto continuo
scritte in un libro di Dershowitz a sua volta mai tradotto in italiano.

 - Mostra testo citato -
Evidentemente, non hai capito un cazzo, come al solito. Ci sono voluti
più di 8000 missili contro Israele per farlo reagire, ma la reazione è
proprio quella che voleva Hamas. Nascondendosi negli ospedali,
sparando ai carri armati israeliani dalle scuole, nascondendo le armi
sotto le moschee, Hamas aveva puntato fin dall'inizio a produrre tante
vittime civili da mostrare alle TV di tutto il mondo e più morti
civili c'erano, meglio era.
Gli israeliani sono stati dei polli o forse non avevano più
alternative ed adesso si ritrovano con il ruolo di carnefici, quando
invece vogliono solo estirpare Hamas per vivere in pace. Hamas è
un'organizzazione terroristica che se ne sbatte della vita dei
palestinesi, ma che per pure ragioni religiose vuole distruggere
Israele, sterminarne i cittadini e conquistare il mondo intero
all'islam, come chiede il corano.
Guarda qua, pollo:
http://dailymotion.alice.it/video/x52ie8_yunis-alastal-dput-du-hamas-tv-alaq_news
Anche gli attentati dell'11 settembre avevano lo stesso scopo, quello
di trascinare in guerra gli USA che anche loro come polli hanno
beccato subito e invece di fare una guerra ne hanno fatte due: una
all'Iraq e l'altra all'Afganistan. Puntualmente sono state prodotte
centinaia di vittime civili e voi, polli al cubo, ne avete attribuito
la responsabilità agli USA e non a quelli che avevano messo a punto
questa strategia. Siete stati talmente polli da attribuire perfino
all'America gli attentati dell'11 settembre, e questo dimostra quanto
poco avete capito della strategia di guerra mediatica su cui puntavano
e puntano i terroristi islamici.
Pooollliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii


chi cazzo sei? Così parli a tua sorella, se ne hai una.
PLONK


Una lunga serie di crimini contro i Palestinesi.
L' ultimo rigurgito di colonialismo.
L'occupazione di terra di altri con annesso genocidio, nel caso fallito.
Da buoni ultimi, dopo perfino agli Italiani.
By
--------------------------------
Inviato via 
http://arianna.libero.it/usenet/

 ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:ab75bc46-e61d-4fd1...@p36g2000prp.googlegroups.com...


Caro amico,
ricordati che sul capo porto la tonsura: questo in effetti secondo studiosi 
più moderni ne dovrebbe accentuare la fallocraticità. Ti riferisci con ogni 
probabilità a questo precedente
opus dell'alacre (ma oggi forzatamente disoccupato) accademico d'origine 
aschenazita:
http://bur.rcslibri.corriere.it/bur/autore/finkelstein_norman_g.html
Si tratta de "L'industria dell'Olocausto". Il titolo originale è "The 
Holocaust Industry" ed è possibile leggere questo volume in modo 
diversamente onesto, per usare  un espressione moderna, procedendo a dorso 
d'asino, ancora meglio a dorso di Mulo.
Buona lettura.