Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: preparando la terza intifada

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3917152,00.html
Preparing for 3rd Intifada
Disturbing book drafted by top Hamas prisoner outlines plan for future
war on Israel
Ronen Bergman Published:  07.08.10, 17:51 / Israel News
"We must carefully examine the hostage's 'quality' – there is a
difference between a married man and single man and between a father
to children and a childless man. It's also important whether his
parents are alive and there is a difference between Ashkenazim and
Sephardim. …we saw that Ehud Goldwasser's wife managed to stir great
empathy because of her status under Jewish law: A married woman whose
husband is missing and whose fate is unknown….Goldwasser gained more
media coverage at Eldad Regev's expensive, even though both of them
were captured at the same time, because the media always looks for
stories that can stir public emotions…"
The above quote is taken from a book titled "Resistance – A View from
the Inside." The secret 200-page document was drafted by Mohammed
Arman, a senior Hamas man jailed in Israel. The research work,
referred to as "Hamas' war plan," was smuggled out of the Hadarim
prison's most guarded wing and distributed among senior Hamas leaders,
in order to prepare the ground for the "next phase" of Palestinian
resistance.
In his document, Arman combined through analysis of terror activities
in the Gaza Strip and West Bank with analysis of Israeli media's
nature add Hamas' strengths and weaknesses in the West Bank. He
demonstrated his arguments using hundreds of examples and quotes about
issues ranging from the technology of tracking cell phones to words
uttered by Levi Eshkol, Golda Meir, and Ehud Barak, among others.
Yet Arman is no military theorist. He is very much a "field activist"
who was among Hamas' most active West Bank commanders until his 2002
arrest. As such, his book is written as a practical guide for field
activists. The document he produced is impressive, detailed, and
mostly frightening, showing deep understanding of Israeli society's
nature and its leadership.
The key points and innovations in the text include the following:
Rocket fire from the West Bank – Arman calls for existing combat
methods to be exported from Gaza to the West Bank, while using
collaborators among Arab Israelis. "We must acquire rockets, which
will be a vital means for the next stage, in order to change the rules
of play in the West Bank and mostly in areas bordering on 1948 land…
even one person can acquire the needed materials for a rocket without
raising suspicions and at very low cost, if we provide him with
information on manufacturing methods. This is the role of resistance
organizations," he wrote.
Throughout the book, Arman disparages what he views as the low
endurance of Israel's home front.
As we know, every person is scared of death, yet our enemy fears death
more than anyone else…this prompts it to constantly consider
abandoning the areas where rockets land," he wrote. "The occupation's
political leadership can tolerate the rockets to a greater extent than
civilians…many Zionists have alternate homes and passports in the
countries of their origin."
Recruiting Arab Israelis – Arman devotes great attention to the role
of Arab Israelis in the Palestinian struggle, with an emphasis on
Jerusalem Arabs. However, he also says that the connection of Israeli
Arabs to terror acts and groups should be blurred.
"The objective of the resistance within the 1948 areas and in
Jerusalem is to harass the occupiers, disrupt their daily routine, and
undermine their confidence," he wrote, adding that this should be done
"in order to encourage migration and discourage immigration by harming
the economy, scaring off wealthy individuals and cowards – without
prompting international reaction that would support the occupation's
acts against residents of these areas (Arab Israelis.)"
"We need those residents in the near feature, and therefore we cannot
take this issue lightly and get them in trouble," he wrote. "The most
effective means is popular war of road sabotage, arson, disrupting
vital communications, and sowing fear among the Zionists without
killing or even wounding them, with the exception of unusual cases."
The technological front – The impressive sources of information
possessed by Arman include debriefings among prisoners. He notes that
many terror cells were detained via the Internet.
"One activist who spoke with Gaza via a messenger program in Internet
cafes was surprised when the intelligence services presented him with
documentation of all the conversations he held in two months," Arman
wrote. "The Internet is being monitored just like the phone, and even
more thoroughly, because the intelligence services can easily gain
access into any e-mail account and impersonate the other party to the
conversation. Many cells were exposed that way."
Arman says that based on his inquiries, Israel's intelligence service
are able to listen to any network, read any text message, and break
into any computer or instant messaging program.
More abduction operations – Much of the text is dedicated to analyzing
abductions as a means for securing the release of Palestinian
prisoners. Although Arman does not mention himself and members of his
cell – who are candidates for release in the Shalit deal – he notes
that resolving the prisoner issue via abductions is at the top of
Hamas' agenda.
In these sections Arman harshly criticizes Israeli society, yet it
appears he fails to understand its nature.
"Zionist society is a society of immigrants from all over the world
who do not know each other, or even themselves," he wrote. "Every
Zionist only thinks of himself…the view of the average Zionist in
respect to prisoner swaps has nothing to do with morality,
nationalistic feelings, or humanity, but rather, is based on fear that
he too may be abducted one day. So he worries about himself first.
This is the Zionist mentality."
Meanwhile, Arman stresses that Gilad Shalit is an "insufficient"
bargaining chip for the Palestinians: "One abduction operation isn't
enough. One soldier will not secure the objective."
Another criteria provided for abduction victims is their professional
background and the knowledge they possess: "The Zionist entity is
characterized by frequent government changes and is full of former
generals, army chiefs, scientists, nuclear facility employees…Their
value is the vital information in their head; information which the
enemy closely safeguards."
In respect to abductions, Arman recommends that operations be carried
out in the West Bank.
"We should know that abductions in the West Bank will draw
implications and responses that are much milder than those in Gaza, as
the entire West Bank is under the occupier's security responsibility…
without an excuse to utilize brutal force against West Bank
residents."
Arman adds that hostages should be held in "underground hideouts, far
away from homes, or at a backyard where there is no security risk
whatsoever…where no neighbor is suspected as being a collaborator of
the occupation."
Adopting the al-Qaeda model – Throughout the document, Arman stresses
the importance of independent activity by terror cells, a modus
operandi utilized successfully by al-Qaeda and Global Jihad groups for
years now. He calls for access to technical information and
operational instructions online for activists interested in training
themselves on using improvised, easy-to-acquire weapons.
"Popular, cheap, and widely available combat means must be developed…
we should avoid scientific entanglements and refrain from referring to
substances by their long and odd scientific names, but rather, use the
names common in Palestine," he wrote.
Arman, who refers to himself as "the engineer behind the Hebrew
University operation" has been sentenced to 36 life terms over his
role in the university terror attack, among others. He is considered
one of the five most senior Hamas prisoners whom the group wants
released in the Shalit deal.
His first book, Death Engineers, which was also smuggled out of
prison, was used by his Hamas successors as a mostly technical guide
for carrying out murderous terror attacks. His latest book is
dedicated to formulating policy ahead of embarking on a "long-term
confrontation that will turn into a war of attrition."
A senior Israeli security official said Arman's book is very
disturbing because it shows deep understanding of Israeli intelligence
agencies' modus operandi, as well as Israeli society at large.
 "Not everything in the book is accurate. In some cases he attributes
to us capabilities we do not possess, while in other cases he
underestimates us," the official said. "Yet as an action plan and an
outline for war, the document can certainly serve as a very dangerous
platform for what may happen in the West Bank in the future, should
the plan he outlined by executed."

Preparing for 3rd Intifada
Colpisce il livello di odio che questi fanatici hanno nei confronti
degli israeliani. Eppure, una eventuale vittoria militare dei
terroristi segnerebbe la loro sconfitta economica, sociale e politica.
Infatti, se gli israeliani fossero costretti a tornare nei paesi di
origine, la Palestina subirebbe un crollo economico dovuto al venir
meno delle industrie e delle altre realtà produttive realizzate dagli
ebrei (com'è già successo a Gaza). Per non parlare del crollo
dell'istruzione e dell'educazione scientifiche. I finanziamenti da
parte di paesi arabi e occidentali non avrebbero più ragione di essere
erogati, quindi in breve tempo si troverebbero ad avere i palestinesi
da gestire comunque e un dilagare dei gruppi terroristici legati ad Al
Qaida in cerca di fondare il loro califfato a spese dei "regimi arabi
corrotti". In breve, tutto il M.O. si troverebbe destabilizzato. 
In preparazione di una eventuale prossima intifada, Israele farebbe
bene a pubblicare nei giornali e parlare alla TV dei metodi di
combattimento che Hamas vuole utilizzare. L'opinione pubblica va
preparata alla legittima autodifesa di Israele. Inoltre, certi
prigionieri particolarmente pericolosi non andrebbero mai rilasciati.
Soprattutto in scambi del tipo 1000/1.

 Colpisce il livello di odio
il loro ha un morto in famiglia o quasi a giustificarlo, il tuo da
cos'è giustificato?

cos'=E8 giustificato?
Il morto in famiglia che hanno se lo sono procurato con il loro
comportamento ovunque sono stati. Erano cittadini giordani, ma
attentarono più volte alla vita del loro sovrano che si incazzò e li
cacciò via. Sono scappati in Libano ma sono stati tenuti ai margini
della società anche per il loro rifiuto di disarmare. Sono andati a
lavorare in Arabia saudita e in Kuwait, ma si allearono con Saddam
durante la seconda guerra del golfo con il risultato che vennero
espulsi anche da quei due paesi. Ora non li vuole più nessuno e nessun
governo arabo dà la cittadinanza ai palestinesi. Se fossero più
sensati cercherebbero di convivere con gli israeliani, se non altro
per i grandi vantaggi politici, sociali ed economici che ne avrebbero.
Questa era anche l'intenzione dei sovrani hashemiti quando invitarono
negli anni '30 del secolo scorso gli ebrei a stabilirsi nelle terre
dove peraltro avevano abitato per molti secoli. Con Fatah, i
palestinesi stavano per arrivare a degli accordi di convivenza, ma
l'arrivo dei fondamentalisti di Hamas che vogliono la distruzione di
Israele per ragioni ideologiche ha riportato le trattative daccapo, in
una situazione dove l'odio reciproco non fa altro che esasperarsi.
Avremmo anche noi europei tante (stupide) ragioni per fare la guerra
fra di noi, se ci mettessimo a fare delle recriminazioni l'uno contro
l'altro. Basti pensare a quante vittime ci siamo fatti combattendo
l'uno contro l'altro nella seconda guerra mondiale, eppure c'è voluto
poco: il riconoscimento dell'idiozia della guerra, la volontà di
finirla con quelle stupide contrapposizioni e abbiamo fondato l'Unione
Europea. Già fin dall'antichità, abbiamo promulgato editti di
tolleranza o simili che hanno fatto finire guerre lunghe e sanguinose.
Perchè non lo fanno anche loro? Perchè invece di dar retta ai
fondamentalisti non cercano piuttosto i motivi per andare d'accordo?

 Il morto in famiglia che hanno se lo sono procurato
vaffanculo. PLONK



Vacci te a fanculo, analfabeta!
Non hai argomenti e tutto quello che sai dire č una stronzata.