Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: USA: Debka File, commissione su 11/9 depistata da Al-Qaeda

notizia del 18/06/2004
17:11 USA: DEBKA FILE, COMMISSIONE SU 11/9 DEPISTATA DA AL-QAEDA
'CONFESSIONI' PILOTATE DI TERRORISTA DETENUTO CONTRO BUSH E SHARON
Gerusalemme, 18 giu. (Adnkronos/Aki) - Il rapporto della commissione
indipendente Usa sull'11 settembre e' pieno di ''smagliature ed
incongruenze''. E' questo il giudizio di esperti americani ed israeliani di
antiterrorismo, citati dal sito Debka file, specializzato in sicurezza ed
intelligence. La testimonianza di Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, terrorista
catturato a Karachi (Pakistan) attualmente detenuto dagli Usa, e' alla base
delle conclusioni del rapporto. Ma quello attuato dal prigioniero e' un
depistaggio mirato, rivela Debka. L'essersi ''dato in pasto'' agli 007
statunitensi e' per i terroristi islamici una missione altrettanto 'nobile e
meritoria' di un attentato suicida. Ed essa ha gia' dato i suoi frutti nella
forma del rapporto, debitamente pubblicizzato dai media, che mira
essenzialmente a scagionare determinati circoli americani e sauditi per
scaricare l'intera responsabilita' della mancata prevenzione dell'attacco
alle Torri gemelle sull'Amministrazione Bush ed il suo alleato israeliano
Ariel Sharon.
Non a caso le ''confessioni'' di Khalid Mohammed indicano che
originariamente Bin Laden avrebbe voluto colpire gli Usa nel 2000, dopo la
controversa visita di Sharon, allora leader dell'opposizione, sul monte del
Tempio, a Gerusalemme, e poi nel 2001, quando lo stesso Sharon era in visita
a Washington. Gli attacchi -afferma il detenuto - furono rinviati perche' i
preparativi non erano completi. Un modo sofisticato per coinvolgere Israele
nella ''responsabilita''' per l'11 settembre, esattamente come si e' tentato
di attribuire alla citata 'sortita' di Sharon sul luogo sacro la causa dello
scoppio dell'Intifada palestinese, in realta' pianificata da anni.
La commissione americana, in altre parole, sarebbe puntualmente caduta nella
trappola della disinformazione di Al-Qaeda: non a caso Khalid Mohammed non
avrebbe ''confessato'' alcunche' in merito alle attivita' presenti e future
dell'organizzazione, limitandosi a ''rivelazioni'' depistanti sul passato.
http://news2000.libero.it/index_news.jhtml?id=6009414
L'articolo di  Debka File
Bush and 9/11 Report: Into the Frame
DEBKAfile Special Analysis
June 17, 2004, 3:33 PM (GMT+02:00)
The US independent commission’s interim account of the September 11 terror
attacks in the United States is full of holes and inconsistencies, according
to American and Israeli intelligence experts close to the war against al
Qaeda. One of its least plausible claims is that Osama bin Laden had pressed
to launch the strikes in the summer of 2000, shortly after Israel’s
soon-to-be prime minister Ariel Sharon made a highly controversial visit to
a disputed holy site in Jerusalem. Later, he pressured the hijackers to
strike in May 2001 and in June and July when Sharon would be visiting the
White House. Each time, he was told the commandos were not ready, the report
said.
A senior expert gave this comment to DEBKAfile: “We see here the outcome of
a cynical attempt to link Sharon, Israel and the Jews to the September 11
atrocities. Sharon is suddenly being blamed not only for the Palestinian
uprising - which was planned years before he visited Temple Mount - but is
also being dragged into focus in relation to al Qaeda’s attacks on America.
This twisted leap is easily traced: the US commission based its findings on
the testimony of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed now in US custody after being
captured in Karachi.”
Many senior counter-terror officials, some of whom have had access to Shaikh
Mohammed and other top captured al Qaeda operatives, have long come to the
conclusion that he and others let themselves be seized for the sake of
advancing a wider al Qaeda disinformation plot. Their mission is to plant
red herrings in the path of US intelligence and lead its investigators away
from the organization’s real operations, especially during reorganizations
of the group’s command structure and terror networks.
This is how it is managed. The designated sacrifice is discovered after
tip-offs lead pursuers to his hideout. Under questioning, he spills the
tales he has been briefed to reveal – usually about past operations - and
withholds anything of real value about al Qaeda’s current activities. His
interrogation is meant to divert US intelligence from noticing preparations
for the terrorist organization’s next moves. Being thrown to the Americans
for such missions is just as much an honor as dying in combat or a suicide
terrorist attack.
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed should have been expected, say the experts, to throw
sand in American eyes. Instead, he found a way to link Sharon to the 9/11
attacks and get the link accepted in an official report - just as his
masters in their broadcast tapes matter-of-factly tie Iraq, Saudi Arabia,
Kashmir, Chechnya, Afghanistan and Spain into a single package. This tie-in
fits the gospel drummed into every al Qaeda member, from the chiefs to the
lowliest courier, that the two enemies of Islam are the Crusaders and the
Jews.
By falling into the Sharon trap, the compilers of the report cast doubt on
their other conclusions, although their final report due next week may make
some necessary corrections.
The obvious point here is if the Israeli motivation was so important in the
chain of events leading up to September 11, why did bin Laden decide to
attack America and not Israel? Or why not both?
DEBKAfile’s experts on terrorism point to some more weak points and misses
in the independent panel’s interim report.
1. It is claimed that the planning of the 9/11 attacks began in 1996. This
is factually erroneous. The planning to destroy the World Trade Center began
in 1991 or 1992 - at latest. Proof of this reposes in the archives of
Manhattan federal court, which tried Ramzi Yousuf for carrying out the first
attack in February 1993. He admitted that the bomb truck he had set up on
Osama bin Laden’s instructions was meant to cause one tower to lean into the
second, bringing both down. Yousuf told the court he was bitterly
disappointed at having killed only six Americans when al Qaeda had counted
on at least a quarter of a million dead. (Incidentally, Sharon held no
official position in 1993, 1996 – or even in 2000)
Bin Laden and his senior lieutenant Ayman Zuwahiri have been in operation
long enough for al Qaeda watchers to understand that they never give up on a
target. If they fail once, they are sure to try again – whatever the cost in
the lives of their own men. The organization is motivated by religious and
operational fanaticism alike. Using this dictum as a working hypothesis, the
heads of the US campaign against the fundamentalist terrorists are sure they
have not seen the end of al Qaeda’s attacks in America.
2. Another instance of Shaikh Mohammed’s wiles is his claim that he had
initially envisioned hijacking 10 planes to target CIA and FBI headquarters,
nuclear stations, the World Trade Center, the White House, the Pentagon and
Capitol Hill, as well as blowing up several aircraft over the Pacific. He
said bin Laden had scaled the plan down. The commission fell for this too.
In actual fact, there was a much older plot that never came off to hijack 10
airliners bound for New York from the Philippines and crash them over key
targets in the United States. This plot originated in 1994 – not 2001. Ramzi
Yousuf was to have orchestrated the 10-plane assault from Manila after he
failed to bring down the Twin Towers. Shaikh Mohammed recycled this plot and
mixed it up with subsequent plans in order to muddy the trail of al Qaeda
agents into America and, still more importantly, to cover up a mystery that
has never been solved and which the report fails to address: How did US air
control authorities and its air defenses come to be blinded to the
hijackings after they were already in progress?
One answer which has not been considered seriously enough is that the
terrorists or their ground support commanded the electronic capabilities for
jamming US tracking devices that ought to have picked up – but didn’t - the
captured airliners as they cut through American air space from airport to
target.
The videotape the Americans found in 2001 in Afghanistan, showing bin Laden
and Zuwahiri discussing their 9/11 success and how it was prepared,
contradicts the Shaikh Mohammed account. They made no reference to a big
plan or a small plan. Bin Laden is seen expressing surprise at how well his
plan worked. He bends his hands together to demonstrate how the towers
tipped towards each other - exactly as he had planned in the early 1990s.
3. The most implausible conclusion that suggests the 9/11 panel is
influenced by a political agenda is its failure to find credible evidence of
links between the Saddam regime and al Qaeda. It is on record that Musab
Zarqawi, who is at present running al Qaeda’s terror campaign in Iraq, was
seen in that country in 1996 or 1997. From 1998 to 2000, he set up a
training base in the northern Kurdistan town of Biyara near the Iranian
border, then under the control of Iraqi military intelligence and the Ansar
al-Islam terrorist group. Iraqi intelligence officers and instructors helped
Zarqawi set up laboratories in Biyara for testing chemical, biological and
radiological weapons.
DEBKAfile’s report appeared in September 2000, before the 9/11 attacks and
well ahead of any US plan to invade Iraq. Indeed the sequence of events that
blew up in the Bush term of office was busy ticking away when Bill Clinton
was still president.
Most authorities ignored the deadly Saddam-al Qaeda association for
developing WMD capabilities then. Now too, the independent inquiry in
Washington neglects to address crucial developments from the time they began
evolving in the early 1990s until 2000. These happenings were pivotal to
subsequent actions and to al Qaeda’s spreading menace.
4. Neither has the panel found evidence that the Saudi government “as an
institution or senior officials within the Saudi government” helped finance
al Qaeda before September 11. This conclusion makes a careful point of
referring to al Qaeda – not Osama bin Laden, whom Saudi intelligence most
certainly did supply with funds. The Saudi ambassador to London, Prince
Turki bin Faisal and brother of Saudi foreign minister Saud al-Faisal, was
until August 9, 2001 the omnipotent chief of Saudi intelligence and
maintained close ties with the CIA. It is common knowledge in Saudi Arabia
and among Middle East intelligence and political circles that Prince Turki
lost his job because of his close relations with the bin Laden clan. Through
them, he stayed in touch with Osama and use roundabout channels to send him
money.
The interim conclusions reached by the 9/11 commission make sense only if it
is presumed that the panel was set up to whitewash certain American and
Saudi political and intelligence bodies and pin the entire blame for al
Qaeda’s attacks in America on the Bush administration – incidentally
dragging in the US president’s ally, the Israeli prime minister. However, as
a state commission charged with an independent inquiry into the causes that
led up to this cataclysmic disaster, the panel is far from fulfilling its
mandate. Indeed, its findings are just as misleading as Shaikh Mohammed must
have intended. The captured terrorist has accomplished his mission
admirably.
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=865

 17:11 USA: DEBKA FILE, COMMISSIONE SU 11/9 DEPISTATA DA AL-QAEDA
Che cazzata. Al-Qa'eda sta diventando la "CIA" dei complottisti di destra.
Secondo loro, c'è al-Qa'eda anche dietro le tre giornate a Totti. Immagino
già il titolo del "Giornale": "Osama boicotta la nazionale di Berlusconi"
(con editoriale di Guzzanti padre: "Azzurri scomodi").
Namib

 Che cazzata. Al-Qa'eda sta diventando la "CIA" dei complottisti di destra.
Quoto
A voler essere maliziosi e' quello di Debka a sembrare un depistaggio: 
"La commissione dice cose scomode sull'amministrazione? E' colpa di AQ, 
non dei membri dell'amministrazione stessa".
Pangloss
-- 
"Too Old to Rock'n'Roll, Too Young to Die"
Ian Anderson

 non dei membri dell'amministrazione stessa".
Bisognerebbe chiedersi che cosa sia Debka e chi sia dietro. Mentre Debka
č sempre interessante da leggere, non c'č alcun motivo per cui gli si
debba credere, tanto piů che la fonte delle sue affermazioni non č mai
citata.
-- 
Luca Logi - Firenze - Italy        e-mail: 
ll...@dada.it

 Bisognerebbe chiedersi che cosa sia Debka e chi sia dietro. 
IMHO e' dietrologia inutile: DEBKA sfrutta semplicemente la libido per 
simili notizie che c'e' in parte del pubblico.
Oltretutto non e' nemmeno molto credibile: spesso pubnblica notizie tra 
il fantastico e l'improbabile tipo SF USA in azione nei territori.


 il fantastico e l'improbabile tipo SF USA in azione nei territori.
Probabilmente i Delta potrebbero infiltrarsi nell'appartamento sopra al
tuo senza che tu te ne renda conto, magari con la collaborazione del sismi...
Raffaele



Beh, mi sembra siate pari...
Per voi la CIA è dietro l'attentato alle twin tower, quello di madrid,
ustica, le elezioni presidenziali negli USA, etc...
Raffaele

 tuo senza che tu te ne renda conto, magari con la collaborazione del sismi...
E informerebbero DEBKA?
Pangloss
P.S. Sopra di me ci stanno 3 peruviani: saranno spie? :D



Si come nel '79 in Iran, penso che le vipere del deserto non si aspettassero
proprio un c-130 sulla testa :-)

 incongruenze''. E' questo il giudizio di esperti americani ed israeliani
di
azzo.
e se lo dicono loro ci dobbiamo credere!!!!
La loro parola vale meno di quella di pinocchio.

 tuo senza che tu te ne renda conto, magari con la collaborazione del
sismi...
Perchè non sono legati ala loro nazione.
Se avessero le palle da veri italiani non si calerebbero i pantaloni a bush.
Ah caro Craxi.
Ci tocca rimpiangerti.
pensa come sono questi di adesso.

 Per voi la CIA è dietro l'attentato alle twin tower [cut]
Sei pregato di usare il "voi" esclusivamente in relazione a sòreta. P.S.
Salùtamela.
Namib