Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: SYRIA: Kofi Annan “Peace Plan” = Ploy. Unspoken Objective = “Regime Change”

SYRIA: Kofi Annan “Peace Plan” = Ploy. Unspoken Objective = “Regime Change”
Post Categories: Africa
Tony Cartalucci | Thursday, May 10, 2012, 11:59 Beijing
 
After admitting UN peace plan was a ploy, Brookings predictably scraps 
it and begins promoting expanded military conflict.
 
By the US policy think-tank Brookings Institution’s own admission, the 
Kofi Annan six-point peace plan in Syria was merely a ploy to buy time 
to reorganize NATO’s ineffective terrorist proxies and provide them the 
pretext necessary for establishing NATO protected safe havens from which 
to carry out their terrorism from. In fact, Brookings actually stated in 
a recent report, “Assessing Options for Regime Change” (emphasis added):
 
     “An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to 
end the violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done 
under Annan’s leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens 
and humanitarian corridors, which would have to be backed by limited 
military power. This would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for 
Syria and could preserve Asad in power. From that starting point, 
however, it is possible that a broad coalition with the appropriate 
international mandate could add further coercive action to its efforts.” 
-page 4, Assessing Options for Regime Change, Brookings Institution.
 
     As if to alleviate any lingering doubts, NATO’s “Alliance News 
Blog” has confirmed that the US is committed not to “peace,” but rather 
to the overthrow of Syria’s government and is “already committed to 
helping [President Bashar al-Assad] fall,” but is “merely looking for 
the least violent, lowest cost way to get there.”
 
The April 9, 2012 blog entry features an op-ed titled, “US ‘already 
committed to helping Assad fall’,” and fully admits that the US is 
equipping the so-called “Free Syrian Army” which has received weapons, 
leadership, and cash from the NATO-backed Libyan Islamic Fighting 
Group(LIFG) terrorists led by notorious mass-murderer Abdul Hakim Belhaj.
And now, the Brookings Institution itself has predictably declared the 
Annan “peace deal” a failure and states that the time to “stretch” 
Syria’s military to the breaking point through expanded foreign-backed 
unrest has come. In an article titled, “Annan’s Mission Impossible: Why 
is everyone pretending that the U.N. plan in Syria has a prayer of 
suceeding?” Brookings Doha Center director Salman Shaikh insults the 
intelligence of his readership while handing out useful talking points 
surely to be parroted by the corporate-media over the next few days and 
weeks.
Shaikh depicts the ceasefire’s failure as solely the result of the 
Syrian government’s belligerence and brutality, while mentioning nothing 
of the Syrian opposition’s documented and even admitted atrocities.
 
And while portraying the Syrian government as irrationally carrying out 
a campaign of brutality against the Syrian people, Shaikh admits that 
the “Free Syrian Army” is operating militarily out of Turkey and that 
the Syrian National Council (SNC) represents foreign harbored and 
influenced leadership. While Shaikh portrays Syria’s minorities as “on 
the sideline,” he declines from explaining why they have not joined the 
foreign-driven unrest. In reality, these groups have been the hardest 
hit by rebel atrocities, including Syria’s large Christian communities.
 
Shaikh’s shoddy salesmanship also reveals another truth – when he claims 
that “opposition leaders inside and outside the country do not have the 
resources to unite their ranks alone.” Surely any opposition group that 
represented the vast majority of the Syrian people, as the UN and the 
corporate-media claim daily, would not have trouble finding the 
resources inside of Syria “alone.” In reality, the unrest in Syria is 
driven by a foreign-backed violent minority, carried out by a 
combination of violent Sunni-extremists from Syria and many foreign 
fighters brought in from abroad. Many of Syria’s real opposition find 
the “Free Syrian Army’s” collaboration with foreigners “unacceptable.”
 
NATO and its proxies’ efforts have failed primarily because the 
movement’s semi-covert foreign backing is still not enough to turn the 
tide, and more overt backing is needed, including foreign military 
intervention. Shaikh’s entire argument hinges on the creation of a 
“genuine grand opposition coalition ” that currently, admittedly, does 
not exist.
 
As the Brookings Institution prepares the next stage of its premeditated 
escalation against the sovereign nation-state of Syria, and continues 
framing the violence as one-sided, a torrent of reports even from the 
corporate-media itself confirms what many geopolitical analysts have 
been saying for over a year – that the “Free Syrian Army” is conducting 
a vicious campaign of terrorism leaving Syrian security forces no choice 
but to continue fighting on to restore order.
 
In fact, just today, Wednesday May 9, 2012, Syrian rebels attempted to 
attack a convoy consisting of Kofi Annan’s UN monitors. France 
inexplicably then blamed the Syrian government for not providing 
adequate security for the UN monitors, after a year of condemning the 
government for attempting to restore order in the face of the very 
growing militant violence the attacks resulted from.
 
And in recent weeks, everything from Human Rights Watch reports, to open 
admissions from the rebels themselves confirm that they are committing 
widespread human rights abuses and turning toward indiscriminate bombing 
tactics. This indicates a threat Syria’s government would be remiss not 
to counter – and surely a threat the “international community” would be 
remiss to continue supporting, funding, and even arming.
 
Now a concerted effort will be made to sabotage the UN peace plan in 
every shape, form, and manner, especially through increased violence and 
particularly in cross-border incidents to help sell NATO-backed, 
Turkey-led incursions into Syria to carve out “safe havens.” From there 
a steady stream of weapons and fighters from around the world will be 
funneled in, in an attempt to, as Brookings Shaikh puts it, stretch 
Syria’s forces “to a breaking point.”
 
To help convince Turkey to “take the plunge” for NATO, the Council on 
Foreign Relations has recently published a report attempting to flesh 
out an improved alliance between the US and Turkey – claiming the new 
relationship would trump the potential for US cooperation with any BRICS 
nation(except perhaps India). This patronizing political stunt attempts 
to fill Turkish leaders with delusions of grandeur, tempting them with 
“goodies” ahead of falling on their swords for Wall Street and London’s 
ambitions in Syria and Iran. Turkish leaders might reassess such 
grandiose claims and remember BRICS’ growth and benefits are based on 
solidarity and production, avoiding “alliances” with Wall Street, 
London, and their institutions, while conversely, Wall Street and 
London’s “benefits” are based on domination, exploitation, betrayal, and 
unsustainable pyramid schemes.
 
Syria’s fate rests on both Syria and its allies’ ability to produce a 
tactical reality on the ground that would make any foreign military 
incursion a disaster. It also depends on either Turkey’s wisdom or 
foolishness in considering the elementary ploy and poisoned “goodies” 
the West is dangling in front of it in exchange for complicity in 
dividing and destroying neighboring Syria.
 
The corporate-financiers centered around the capitals of the West have 
committed to a global war aimed at permanently destroying nation-states 
and replacing them with a homogeneous administrative system built out of 
Wall Street and London-funded NGOs, interlocking with the West’s 
contrived “international institutions.” It is in essence, a World War, 
currently being fought with 4th generation warfare to build a 
neo-imperial global government has begun. With overt efforts to 
destabilize nations around the world, including Russia and China, the 
West’s hand is revealed and there is no turning back.
 
The only hope of stopping disaster if either the corporate-financiers 
succeed or fail (thus turning in and feeding on itself), is to recognize 
their source of power, and begin undermining it on a daily basis through 
both boycotting their goods and services, while simultaneously replacing 
their corporations and institutions with local, genuine alternatives. 
Syria may seem like an isolated conflict, but is in reality linked to us 
directly, regardless of where we live. Either we live in a nation that 
will be next, or a nation who will be further crushed under the hubris, 
power, and arrogance of an empowered Wall Street and London elite.
 
http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/05/10/syria-kofi-annan-peace-plan%e2%80%9d-ploy-unspoken-objective-regime-change/
 
-- 
Sostieni Rete ECO
 
http://rete-eco.it/it/sostienici.html
 
 

 dividing and destroying neighboring Syria.
 
Confusione nel campetto rossobruno
 
 
 
-- 
"Quando ti incontro per la strada ti darei calci nei denti. Ma forse non 
li senti. E' meglio se ti rullo di kartoni (kartoni)"