Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Volenterosi islamici di Hitler

L'articolo qui riportato è stato pubblicato da l'Avvenire, e copiato da:
http://www.informazionecorretta.it/showPage.php?template=rassegna&id=769
È però sfuggito al recensore un problema: Stefano Favei ha fatto di
tutto per NON parlare del Khurbn/Shoah/Olocausto, e per non chiedersi se
e quanto il Gran Muftì vi contribuì.
Ciao.
(cit)
In nome dell'antisionismo, dell'anticomunismo e dell'anticolonialismo si
realizzò un'alleanza tra i nazionalsocialisti e gli esponenti islamici
del tempo, tra i quali il celebre muftì di Gerusalemme, Amin al-Husayni.
Una convergenza tra "Il fascio, la svastica e la mezzaluna" che viene
analizzata nel volume omonimo da Stefano Fabei (Mursia, pagine 410, euro
26).
In realtà la presa della croce uncinata fu più avvolgente di quella del
littorio. L'ammirazione che il Führer godette presso i musulmani fu
"sconfinata", nota nella prefazione al volume il nostro massimo studioso
di colonialismo, Angelo Del Boca. Adolf veniva chiamato Abu Ali e si era
diffusa la convinzione che si fosse convertito all'islam. Addirittura un
anonimo poeta arabo compose per lui degli imbarazzanti versi
encomiastici: "Non più monsieur né mister / tutti fuori sgomberate il
campo / in cielo Allah, sulla terra Hitler". Soprattutto con la guerra
ci fu un incremento di tale appoggio. Hitler prometteva, infatti, di
essere un paladino delle frustrate aspirazioni di liberazione delle
popolazioni islamiche in Palestina, come alleato nella lotta con Israele
(che sarebbe nato nel 1948, ma le cui premesse erano state gettate nel
1917 con la Dichiarazione Balfour), contro le potenze coloniali come
l'Inghilterra e anche contro il comunismo che assoggettava molti fedeli
del Corano nella Repubbliche asiatiche dell'Urss. Nel "Mein Kampf",
inoltre, il futuro dittatore aveva espresso in più punti la sua
avversione per il colonialismo.
Fu proprio il fatto che l'Italia, diversamente dalla Germania, avesse
ancora terre conquistate in Africa e mostrasse intenzioni egemoniche sul
Mediterraneo a far godere minor prestigio a Mussolini. Una fiammata si
ebbe nel 1942, quando l'esercito dell'Asse arrivò alle porte di
Alessandria d'Egitto e il maestro di Predappio divenne, con un pomposo
gioco di parole, Mussa-Nili (il Mosè del Nilo). Ma fu gloria breve, la
sconfitta militare e la diffidenza del mondo musulmano per il Duce
fecero il resto.
Non fu un caso, dunque, che la carne da cannone che le milizie islamiste
fornirono ai due alleati fosse di proporzioni molto diverse: pochissimi
gli arabi che si batterono e morirono a fianco degli italiani e il
tentativo di costituire una "Legione araba" all'interno del Regio
esercito fallì. Al contrario, tra 1941 e 1945 fecero parte delle unità
militari del Reich 13mila tra siriani, palestinesi, iracheni ed
egiziani, 60mila musulmani balcanici, 350mila caucasici, di cui ben
170mila caddero, "il che significa - commenta Del Boca - che le truppe
musulmane furono sempre usate in prima linea". E per i lavori sporchi,
come la repressione dei partigiani nel Piacentino e nel Parmense portata
avanti dalla 162­ª divisione "Turkestan".
Merito della ventennale ricerca di Fabei oltre a gettare luce su una
vicenda nota solo a grandi linee è anche l'indagine sui filoni culturali
ed economici che già legavano Germania e Impero ottomano e che con
Hitler si rafforzarono anche per l'affine visione della comunità come
"Volk" e la condivisa avversione per la democrazia
(:cit)

>
http://www.baltech.org/ledermann/bush-ibm-2-13-01.html
To a Directory of Mr.Lederman's Essays
In Light of IBM,
Will GW Bush Admit
His Own Nazi Connection?
by Robert Lederman
robert....@worldnet.att.net
February 13, 2001
Now that IBM, one of Americas' most respected corporations, has been exposed
as an enthusiastic ally of Nazi Germany whose technology helped make the
Holocaust possible it seems timely to ask, when will GW Bush publicly deal
with his families' numerous links to the Third Reich? [1]
The Bush family and IBIBM are in good company. Among the many corporations
and famous American individuals with their own direct link to Nazi Germany
were Henry Ford, JP Morgan, Dupont, Mellon, Allen Dulles (America's first
CIA director), John Foster Dulles (President Eisenhower's Secretary of
State), Charles Lindbergh, William Randolph Hearst, Alcoa Aluminum,
Rockefellers' Standard Oil (now Exxon), General Motors, ITT and Chase
Manhattan Bank. [2]
For these corporations and individuals this was not simply a matter of
having an investment in a German subsidiary. Some of these corporate heads
met repeatedly with Hitler and his closest advisors, contributed millions of
dollars to help establish the Nazi party and in some cases - such as the
Bush and Rockefeller families - continued to channel money and advanced
technology to the Nazis even after the US entered WWII.
Some of these corporations, like Chase Manhattan Bank, have publicly
apologized for their Nazi connection. Others have acknowledged but not
apologized for it. In the case of the Bush family they have neither
acknowledged nor apologized for it. [3]
In the case of our new President the connection is not limited to an
embarrassing episode of WWII history. His father, former President Bush, was
exposed in 1988 for having numerous former Nazis and Nazi sympathizers in
his Presidential campaign. GW Bush's corporate cabinet prominently features
representatives of many of the same companies that were Hitler's biggest
American supporters, like Alcoa and GM. His appointees have numerous direct
ties to racist organizations like the Pioneer Fund which helped write both
the US and Nazi eugenics laws and to modern day eugenicists like Charles
Murray, author of the Bell Curve. Bush's entire domestic agenda, the
absurdly named, "compassionate conservatism", was invented by the CIA's
Manhattan Institute a right wing think tank founded by former CIA director
William Casey who helped bring thousands of former Nazis to the US following
WWII. The Bell Curve was written while Murray was a fellow at the Manhattan
Institute and he continues to lecture there to this day. [4]
It is understandable that the media, which depends on corporate ads for
their livelihood, is not falling over itself to expose these Nazi ties but
in light of the IBM story isn't it time to let all of this dirty laundry be
aired once and for all?
If IBM can be forced to come clean, can the US President hide his own far
more extensive links to Nazi Germany any longer? The American people have a
right to know.
[1] Bush, IBM etc link to Nazis:
Washington Post, IBM Technology Aided Holocaust, Author Alleges (Click Here)
NY Daily News 2/10/2001, Book Links IBM to Hitler
Sarasota Herald-Tribune 11/11/2000 Author links Bush family to Nazis (Click
Here)
Philadelphia Inquirer 9/10/98 "Fired Bush backer one of several with
possible Nazi links,"September 10, 1988;
Washington Post Friday, September 16, 1988 ; Page A16 "Behind Scenes, Damage
Control Has Become Vital Weapon for Bush"also see:
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
The Secret War Against the Jews by former US Dept of Justice Nazi War Crimes
investigator, John Loftus, St. Martin's Press.
[2]
Trading with the Enemy by Charles Higham, 1983;
The Splendid Blond Beast: Money Law and Genocide in the Twentieth Century by
Christopher Simpson, 1993;
Blowback, by Christopher Simpson, Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1988;
OLD NAZIS, THE NEW RIGHT, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY by Russ Bellant
"If America loses this war," said Secretary of the Interior (Harold) Ickes,
June 26, 1941, "it can thank the Aluminum Corporation of America.""By its
cartel agreement with I.G. Farben, controlled by Hitler," writes Seldes,
"Alcoa sabotaged the aluminum program of the U.S. air force. The Truman
Committee (on National Defense, chaired by then- Senator Harry S. Truman in
1942) heard testimony that Alcoa's representative, A.H. Bunker, head of the
aluminum section of O.P.M., prevented work on our $600,000,000 aluminum
expansion program."
"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to
supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist
regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in
Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the
Nazi regime. . .Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with
bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended
aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep
it there." - William E. Dodd, U.S. Ambassador to Germany, 1937.-Facts and
Fascism, George Seldes, p. 122 Trading with the Enemy, Charles Higham, p.167
[3] Chase Bank apologizes (Click Here)
Daily News 12/7/98
Chase Banked On Nazis -
Report: Chase National Bank ". . . the precursor of today's Chase Manhattan
Bank "allegedly helped the Nazis plunder Jewish property in France during
World War II, according to a published report.
The New York-based bank controlled by the Rockefeller family closed Jewish
accounts even before the Germans ordered them to do so and did business with
the Nazis while they were sending Jews to the gas chambers, Newsweek
magazine reports in this week's edition.
And while the U.S. was at war with the Nazis, Chase also apparently helped
German banks do business with their overseas branches, the magazine
reported.
Chase Manhattan is now the largest bank company in the U.S. with more than
$300 billion in assets...lawyers representing Holocaust survivors...intend
to name Chase Manhattan to their lawsuit and are investigating the wartime
role of another big U.S. bank, J.P. Morgan, the magazine reported. While
many other U.S. businesses and banks closed down their Paris operations
after France fell to the Germans, Chase National remained open and even
thrived.
The relationship between Chase and the Nazis apparently was so cozy that
Carlos Niedermann, the Chase branch chief in Paris, wrote his supervisor in
Manhattan that the bank enjoyed "very special esteem"with top German
officials and "a rapid expansion of deposits,"according to Newsweek.
Niedermann's letter was written in May 1942 "five months after the Japanese
bombed Pearl Harbor and the U.S. also went to war with Germany."
[4] Eugenics, Pioneer Fund, Bell Curve, Manhattan Institute
(b) NY Times Monday, May 12, 1997 Manhattan Institute Has Nudged New York
Rightward "...the institute was founded as a free-market education and
research organization by William Casey, who then went off to head the
Central Intelligence Agency in the Reagan Administration."
(c) NY Times June 12, 2000 Bush Culls Campaign Theme From Conservative
Thinkers ". George W. Bush has said his political views have been shaped by
the work of Myron Magnet of the Manhattan Institute."
(Click Here) U.S. Eugenics Like Nazi Policy Study: Forced Sterilizations
Carried Out Longer Than Thought
WASHINGTON POST:
Va. House Voices Regret for Eugenics, State Was Once a Leader In Forced
Sterilizations (Click Here)
Other relevant sites:
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
(Click Here)
To search for the thousands of websites with material on Bush and the Nazis
use a good search engine such as Goggle 
http://www.google.com/
 and just type
in Bush AND Nazi or US corporation AND Nazi or Bell Curve AND Pioneer Fund
Previous articles by Robert Lederman on these issues can be accessed at
http://Baltech.org/lederman
Robert Lederman, President of A.R.T.I.S.T. (Artists (tm) Response To Illegal
State Tactics) 
robert....@worldnet.att.net
SLATE.COM
 - April 17, 2002
By Anne E. Kornblut
(Click Here for original Web link.)
The Bush family and the Jews
Unlike his father and grandfather, George W. has crafted a pro-Jewish image.
Flanked by Jewish leaders, President George W. Bush signed a proclamation
March 25 recognizing the commitment to education demonstrated by the late
leader of the Jewish Lubavitcher movement, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
In 1998, George W. Bush took his first and only trip to the Holy Land.
During a helicopter tour - guided by none other than Ariel Sharon - Bush was
astonished to discover how tiny Israel is compared to its Arab neighbors. He
later described the visit as one of the most meaningful experiences of his
life.
A photographer captured a striking image of Bush, in a yarmulke, standing
reverently at the Wailing Wall.
THE PICTURE may be a symbol of Bush foreign policy these days, but it speaks
to an even more startling truth: Bush is the first in his family of
politicians to craft a pro-Jewish image.
Starting with accusations that Prescott Bush was a Nazi collaborator before
Pearl Harbor, the Bush dynasty has generally been viewed with suspicion and
at times outright hostility by Jewish Americans. The elder President Bush
outraged the Jewish community with a series of perceived insults. Before he
became president, the younger Bush, who once expressed doubt about whether
non-Christians could get into heaven, seemed likely to follow in the family
tradition.
THE FAMILY TREE
The charges against Sen. Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the current
president, went beyond the disdain for Jews and discriminatory practices
that were characteristic of New England WASP culture in his day. Prescott
Bush was a director of a New York bank where rich Germans who supported the
Nazis stashed millions in personal wealth. He was still a director at the
bank, Union Banking Corp., when its assets were frozen under the Trading
With the Enemy Act in 1941 - a fact that has provided endless fodder for
leftists and conspiracy theorists since it came to light in the 1990s.
George Herbert Walker Bush shared the same exclusionary pedigree as his
father, starting with Yale and the secret society Skull & Bones, and had
extensive ties to Arabs though the oil industry as well. But most Jews did
not consider him unfriendly to their interests so long as he served under
Ronald Reagan. Reagan was the first Republican in 80 years to win a sizable
share of the Jewish vote. There were a variety of reasons for this, but the
key issue was Reagan's hard line on the defense of Israel, which he
considered a crucial democratic outpost in the fight against Soviet
communism. In the 1980 election, Jimmy Carter won 45 percent of the Jewish
vote. Reagan won 39 percent.
HARD LINE ON ISRAEL
That remarkable shift, however, began to be undone almost as soon as George
H.W. Bush took over in 1989. Bush was a self-described pragmatist in
international affairs, and in the giddy early days after the end of the Cold
War, it was no longer fashionable to view the world in binary terms. As a
result, many conservative ideological causes - among them Israel - no longer
found a champion in the White House. The point was made most clearly when
Bush demanded, in 1991, that the Israelis stop building new settlements in
Palestinian-controlled territories. Unlike previous presidents, Bush sounded
serious, threatening to block millions in loan guarantees if Israel
disobeyed. (Later, when his re-election was in doubt in 1992, Bush promised
to press Congress for the loan guarantees unconditionally.)
Just as damaging was the elder Bush's knack for seeming as out of touch with
Jewish voters as he did with everyone else. Once, during a 1991 White House
press conference, Bush Sr. complained about the strength of the Jewish lobby
on Capitol Hill - the implication being that "Jews work insidiously behind
the scenes," as David J. Forman wrote in the Jerusalem Post. On another
occasion, Bush reminded his critics that the United States gives "Israel the
equivalent of $1,000 for every Israeli citizen," a remark that detractors
took as an allusion to the stereotype of Jews as money-obsessed and greedy.
And then there was Secretary of State James Baker's infamous "f-- the Jews"
remark. In a private conversation with a colleague about Israel, Baker
reportedly uttered the vulgarity, noting that Jews "didn't vote for us
anyway." This was more or less true - Bush got 27 percent of the Jewish
vote, compared with 73 percent for Dukakis, in 1988. And thanks in part to
Baker, it was even truer in 1992, when Bill Clinton got 78 percent of the
Jewish vote and Bush got only 15 percent - the poorest showing by a
Republican candidate since Barry Goldwater in 1964.
COURTING THE JEWISH VOTE
In 2000, as Al Gore hit the campaign trail with the first Jewish vice
presidential running mate in U.S. history on his ticket, George W. Bush
seemed to make only a half-hearted attempt to compete for Jewish votes. He
paid the obligatory dues, speaking at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee and visiting the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles (where,
after touring the sobering Holocaust exhibit, he incongruously signed the
guest book, "God bless this world!"). But Bush reserved his real pitch for
Arab-Americans, whom his strategists viewed as an increasingly powerful
voting bloc. Repeated trips to Michigan, a swing state, gave Bush ample
opportunity to meet with Arab-American leaders, heavily concentrated around
Detroit. Ironically, he made a campaign pledge to examine "secret evidence"
cases against foreign suspects, a matter of great concern among
Arab-Americans (and one that fell by the wayside after Sept. 11).
Like his father, Bush failed during the campaign to win over neoconservative
Jewish intellectuals - most notably William Kristol, who openly backed John
McCain. The problem wasn't just the assumption that he shared his father's
coolness toward Israel. It was also his perceived insensitivity toward Jews,
as characterized by the only-Christians-in-heaven remark. Bush later joked
about the uproar caused by the exchange. Asked by a reporter what he planned
to tell the Israelis as he prepared to embark on his 1998 trip to the Middle
East, Bush replied, obviously in jest, "Go to hell." Gore got 79 percent of
the Jewish vote. Bush got only 19 percent.
BREAK FROM PAST
Unlike his father, George W. Bush has risen in the esteem of many prominent
Jews since taking office.
But unlike his father, who never managed to repair his relationship with the
Jewish community despite several attempts, Bush has only risen in the esteem
of many prominent Jews since taking office. The biggest factor is probably
the Sept. 11 attacks. After a brief flurry of activity to win Arab support
for the war on Afghanistan, Bush began to connect America's struggle against
terrorism with Israel's fight against Palestinian suicide bombers. Though he
was criticized for sitting on the sidelines as the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict worsened, Bush arguably took sides by dropping the standard call
for the Israelis to "show restraint." After briefly responding to
international pressure to demand an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank,
Bush quickly backed off.
Another factor is shrewd political judgment. At pains to avoid repeating
political mistakes his father made, Bush has actively courted conservatives
within the Republican coalition. That includes Jewish neoconservatives such
as Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who hopes to encourage Bush
to avoid another mistake of his father's - failing to topple Saddam Hussein.
It was Wolfowitz who Bush sent to address the big pro-Israel rally that took
place at the Capitol on April 15.
SINCERE WARMTH
But the biggest reason Bush has been able to win over Jews may be personal.
Despite his own Skull & Bones pedigree, the president is far less WASP-ish
in his tastes and manner than past generations of Bushes, making him less
suspect in the eyes of some Jewish Americans. Moreover, he is openly
religious in a way that conveys deep respect for religious believers of all
kinds. He may even be influenced by the view of Gary Bauer and other
fundamentalist Christians who believe that the Jews are biblically ordained
to live in the Holy Land. And unlike his father's administration, George W.
Bush's is prominently filled with members of the tribe. Most notably, the
public face of the White House, spokesman Ari Fleischer, is a practicing
Jew.
But whatever the impetus, Bush appears to be entirely sincere in his warmth
toward the Jewish people. Since Sept. 11, he has resisted condemning his old
tour guide, Ariel Sharon, as harshly as his father condemned former Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. He has also applied the "Bush Doctrine" to
Israel, saying in his April 4 Rose Garden address: "Terror must be stopped.
No nation can negotiate with terrorists. For there is no way to make peace
with those whose only goal is death." It's hard to imagine any Bush from a
previous generation taking the side of the Jews so unequivocally.
Anne E. Kornblut
is White House correspondent
for the Boston Globe.
To a Directory of Mr.Lederman's Essays
Search This Site  The Web
Get a Search Engine For Your Web Site
Robert Lederman is an artist, writer and activist and is also the President
of the street artist advocacy group, A.R.T.I.S.T.
Click here for an archive of A.R.T.I.S.T. related news articles on the
Freedom Forum website
His essays and Op-Eds have appeared in hundreds of alternative publications
as well as the Daily News, Penthouse, Africa Sun Times, Street News and The
Shadow.
Lederman was falsely arrested 41 times for his anti-Giuliani activities and
was never convicted of any of the charges. As a result of the arrests, he's
won four Federal lawsuits and overturned three laws.
He is best known for having created hundreds of paintings of Mayor Giuliani
as a Hitler like dictator which were carried in demonstrations throughout
the eight years of the Giuliani administration. Images of his paintings and
articles about his arrests and lawsuits have appeared on all of the major
television networks hundreds of times as well as frequently appearing in the
NY Times, Daily News, NY Post, Newsday, Newsweek, People, The Washington
Post, LA Times and NY Magazine.
Robert Lederman,
President of A.R.T.I.S.T.
(Artists' Response To Illegal State Tactics)
robert....@worldnet.att.net
For a detailed exposition on the West Nile issue
http://www.nospray.org/
For an article on the Manhattan Institute go to
http://www.konformist.com/2000/rudyg.htm
If you would like to help oppose the spraying,
please write to the
No Spray Coalition
PO Box 334
Peck Slip Station
NYC, NY 10272-0334
or call the No Spray hotline at 
(718) 670-7110
.
Any funds you can send to help continue the lawsuit
and this work are greatly appreciated.
Important Note:
Mr. Lederman has explained that his articles posted here are not to be taken
as official statements by the No-Spray Coalition of which he is a member or
of the "No-Spray" lawsuit in which he is a plaintiff.
Try this new Blog
Public Housing Spotlight magazine
For a great source of general tenant information,
visit the Tenant Net Home Page |
And for a great source of New York City news and
policy information, visit our friends at the Gotham Gazette
Click here to view City Limits Magazine
©2001 Baltech Productions. All rights reserved.

 wrote in message
dRT2a.178512$0v.49...@news1.tin.it...
Il problema che poni è certamente vero.
Per esempio il Gran Muftì di Gerusalemme fu spesso in Germania e aveva
rapporti politici con Hitler.
C'è da dire che i fascismi usarono spesso l'islam pro domo propria: anche
Mussolini si fece forgiare in Libia la "spada dell'islam", proclamandosi
come una specie di campione della fede islamica!
Io credo però, che l'appoggio nazifascista agli arabi avesse solo 2 terreni
comuni:
- l'odio per gli ebrei (legato a motivi ideologici x i nazifascisti e
religiosi x gli arabi)
- l'odio x le potenze coloniali (perché capitaliste x i nazifascisti, perché
imperialiste x gli arabi)
Nel complesso non credo che fosse una base d'alleanza solida.
Se Hitler avesse vinto la guerra, credo che non ci avrebbe messo molto ad
attaccare i paesi musulmani. Ricordiamoci che gli arabi, come gli ebrei,
sono SEMITI !
ciao
k.