Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: il miracolo di Olmert

con queste parole:
“sono orgoglioso di essere cittadino di un paese in cui anche un primo
ministro può essere indagato dalla polizia come un semplice
cittadino”.
 è riuscito a fare diventare sionista quasi tutta la gauche caviar
antiberlusconiana, da Barenghi, a Nanni Moretti, all'Unità....
peccato che come al solito certa sinistra si dimentichi di citare la
prosecuzione del discorso "filogiustizialista" di Olmert:
“il primo ministro non è al di sopra delle legge, ma nemmeno al di
sotto. E’ vero che sono il primo ministro, e sono un bersaglio
naturale per la lotta politica, ma in Israele si è perso il senso
della misura, ogni persona intelligente sa che le cose sono fuori
proporzione. Perché nessuno, né un funzionario né un inquirente né un
avvocato ha il diritto o l’autorità di decidere se il primo ministro
può continuare nel suo incarico. Queste cose dovrebbero discendere da
una procedura responsabile, serena, ordinata, come in ogni paese
democratico. Una procedura che purtroppo qui non ha più luogo”.
insomma, è fonte d'orgoglio che in democrazia il PM venga indagato, ma
ormai Israele non è più una democrazia perchè i giudici osano indagare
sul PM.

 antiberlusconiana, da Barenghi, a Nanni Moretti, all'Unità....
Gideon Levy ieri ha scritto un'articolo che calza proprio a fagiolo
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1007836.html
Like the "investigative journalism" programs we see on television, the
self-righteous preoccupy themselves with trifle matters. How great it
must be to make a name for yourself as a pursuer of justice as you
shine the spotlight of your "investigation" onto a rabbi who got a
little too frisky or the mechanic who overcharges his customer
....
. Olmert failed the Kolbotek (a popular consumer affairs TV show)
litmus test, and he deserves to be punished accordingly, but the
saintly image of the hell-bent seekers of justice that has been
affixed to those who have brought him down is exaggerated, if not
ridiculous.
Olmert's predecessor was suspected of far more serious crimes. Ariel
Sharon and his sons allegedly laid their hands on sums of money that
far exceed what has been attributed to Olmert, but Sharon exited the
stage of history as a beloved, admired leader, a likeable grandfather
figure who tended to his herd and did not harm a soul. A war against
Sharon's corruption was a far more difficult proposition because
Sharon cut a strong, threatening figure, and he was cherished. He was
also responsible for the disengagement, which for some reason was
portrayed by some as a step toward peace - perhaps that was the reason
why the criminal investigations against him were buried. Those who
closed the investigations without indictments and forgave Sharon are
also those who are now bitterly ensconced in all-out war against his
successor, who is cleaner and weaker by comparison.
But the danger lurking around the corner emanates from a different
direction. The law enforcement agencies, the police, the prosecutors
and the courts - those we blindly admire - have for some time now
ceased to operate as a system of justice with equal rights for all.
Rich and poor, Jew and Arab do not receive the same treatment. Can
anyone seriously claim that a wealthy individual armed with a phalanx
of high-priced lawyers is consigned to the same legal fate as that of
"Buzaglo," the average Israeli? Would a Jewish child who hurled a rock
at a car receive the same punishment as an Arab child who did the
same? Do the Israel Defense Forces and the police investigate settler
crimes against Palestinians with the same sense of urgency? Is it a
coincidence that the trigger fingers of Israel's police officers
become itchier time and again whenever their weapons are pointed in
the direction of Arab lawbreakers?
Israel's legal system has already laid the groundwork for the
legitimization of an apartheid regime. This is the real danger to the
rule of law: The quasi automatic enlistment of the justice system by
the defense establishment endangers the rule of law more than all this
Olmertism. The IDF's ignoring of High Court rulings, much like the ban
on the use of the "neighbor procedure" (soldiers using Palestinian
civilians as human shields when arresting militants); the fact that
the Shin Bet security service continues to torture suspects in
contravention of a High Court ruling; and the failure to implement the
court-ordered change to the route of the separation fence should have
sent alarm bells ringing among the guardians of justice.
When settlers continue to rampage against Palestinians - not nearly a
day goes by without a pogrom and there is no place where armed
militias don't roam around, yet nobody investigates these acts nor is
anyone tried in court - this threatens the state's character much more
than all of Olmert's cash-stuffed envelopes. The situation in the
southern Hebron Hills, for example, which for a while now has become
abandoned territory, endangers the rule of law far more than all of
Olmert's investigations.
In light of all of this, the self-styled knights of justice remain
silent, cover their eyes, neither seeing nor hearing. Most
importantly, they do not confront these ills. True, it is difficult to
do so. It is likely to arouse fierce resistance. So, as a result, they
plunge their swords into convenient places, which are safe and which
everyone agrees on. They are no Emile Zolas. Rather, just miniature
Rafi Ginats.


 Gideon Levy
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH!
AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!
AH!  AH! AH! AH! AH!

 legitimization of an apartheid regime.
Sta puttanata la ripete piu' e piu' volte, sperando, come quel *FESSO*
di un Torrieri, che ripetendola come una litania diventi piu' vera.
-Stefano