Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Mosca al freddo?

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060905/53517839.html
Moscow mayor says winter energy deficit could reach 20%
MOSCOW - Moscow's mayor warned Tuesday that the capital could face an
energy deficit of 20% this winter, sparking concerns that temporary
business closures seen in January could be repeated.
"Energy consumption is abnormal at present and the deficit registered
in the past is very large," Yury Luzhkov said.
Porelli, mi dispiace.
Forse è per quello che hanno accettato di comprare il gas Kazako a 100$?
Qualcuno ha detto che entro il 2010 la sovrapproduzione di gas russo
dovrebbe terminare e non bastare neanche per l'uso interno.
Mirco

 dovrebbe terminare e non bastare neanche per l'uso interno.
Sarebbero cazzi amarissimi anche per noi.
Tb
-- 
Diario di guerra
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Sarebbero cazzi amarissimi anche per noi.
Noi i soldi per il gas li abbiamo, loro no.
E il gas va a chi paga.
Se non vendono il gas, come la mantengono l'economia?
Mirco

 Se non vendono il gas, come la mantengono l'economia?
Ah, beh... che i russi siano messsi ancora peggio non ci piove.
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 degassificatore,
Rigassificatore, suppongo.

>degassificatore,
  > Rigassificatore, suppongo.
Cavolo, sě.
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Ah, beh... che i russi siano messsi ancora peggio non ci piove.
non hanno piu' debito estero , poveracci <g>

.sergio. wrote:

Poveracci davvero. Un'economia basata sull'export di materie prime č né piů né 
meno che terzo mondo.
Finché ci sono le materie e il prezzo, č grasso che cola per gli oligarchi 
(includo negli oligarchi i monopolisti statali). Poi diventa l'inferno per tutti.
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 meno che terzo mondo.
una rispostina indiretta a cialtronazzi russofobi come il tarato londinese 
e il nazistucolo dipendente dell'ASL 
The Russian economy: not by oil alone 
MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti economic commentator Vasily Zubkov) - A reader 
recently asked me, "Could Russia live without oil?" This counterfactual 
question requires hypothetical answers. 
Russian oil is not an abstract entity. Oil is transport, electricity, 
petrochemicals, and many other things. There are oil-dependent sectors, 
such as pipeline transport and the production of steel pipes. Let's try to 
view this hypothetical situation in three dimensions: exports, influence 
on GDP, and budget receipts. 
Let's consider exports first. This year Russia plans to produce 479-484 
million metric tons of oil, up 2%-2.5% against last year. In the first 
half of 2006, 276.7 million metric tons of oil were produced. Crude oil 
exports are growing and totaled 126.7 million metric tons in the same 
period. 
Russia is the world's No. 2 oil supplier. Oil accounted for 34.6% of 
Russian exports last year, and 32.1% in 2004. Where does the rest, 
equivalent to $160 billion worth of oil exports, come from? 
The answer is natural gas, armaments, defense technology, ferrous and 
non-ferrous metals, metal products, fertilizers, petrochemicals, products 
of oil and gas refining, grain, timber and timber products, coal, 
electricity, steel pipes, machine building, etc. The list makes it clear 
that apart from oil the country has other reliable sources of foreign 
exchange earnings. The International Bank for Reconstruction and 
Development has calculated that if not for high oil prices, economic 
growth in Russia would be 4%-4.5%. There would not be any Stabilization 
Fund, or it would be much smaller. Yet money from the huge Stabilization 
Fund is saved to provide against an unfavorable global situation for 
Russia. 
Russia exports what is in demand overseas and what remains after it 
satisfies its own needs. The range of Russian exports also indicates how 
well its industries have developed. 
Take ferrous metallurgy. Last year, 50 million metric tons of metal worth 
some $20 billion were sold overseas. Export revenues grow 5%-6% annually. 
Russia is becoming a serious player on the global metals market. 
Production modernization, the most up-to-date technologies and innovative 
materials for metallurgy give cause for hope that metallurgical companies 
have a big potential for growth, the more so as the government is doing 
its best to support the sector. That is why rivals from the U.S. and 
Europe have been imposing limitations on Russian exports through the 
introduction of quotas and other protectionist measures. In turn, owners 
of Russian steel factories are actively buying new assets abroad to bypass 
customs restrictions. Russia and the EU are expected to review their 
commercial agreement next year to fix Russia's new metals quotas. 
Or take Russian chemical production. The export component in the sector 
determines the efficiency of chemical and petrochemical companies. 
Certainly, new plants should be built, the newest technologies introduced 
and tens of billions of dollars invested. Yet the sector is quite lively 
now. According to a recent report by the Industry and Energy Ministry, in 
the past three years there has been an annual 11% increase in the export 
of chemicals, the aggregate value of which has already exceeded $10 
billion. 
The Russian timber industry also has a large export potential. Only Brazil 
can rival Russia which has 25% of global wood resources. Experts have 
calculated that if more finished timber were exported, it could yield hard 
currency proceeds equivalent to the country's revenues from crude oil 
sales. 
According to expert estimates, the export potential of Russia's timber 
industry is $120 billion. So far, round timber exports have barely 
exceeded $10 billion. And the fact that Russia accounts for 22% of global 
rough timber sales is not something to be proud of. The government intends 
to encourage sales of finished timber products and restrict the export of 
round timber. 
This is how things stand with non-oil exports. Without liquid hydrocarbons 
Russia would still be ranked among the top twenty countries in foreign 
trade volume. Things are not bad in the economy at large, either. Nobody 
dares call Russia the "Upper Volta with rockets" now. The country's GDP 
was some $600 billion four years ago, while this year it will reach $900 
billion. Russian President Vladimir Putin's wish to double GDP by 2010 may 
come true. And the U.S. is considering removing Russia from the 
Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) allegedly because the rich 
Russians no longer need privileges. 
What would Russia's GDP be like without oil? According to official 
reports, the share of the oil and gas sector in GDP has remained within 9% 
in the past few years, and the entire industry accounts for 31% of GDP. 
Experts with the Development Center believe that official statistics 
diminish the role of industries, in particular the oil and gas sector, on 
purpose to promote trade. They believe oil and gas, including pipeline 
transport, account for 25% of GDP, while the country's industrial sector 
apart from oil and gas for 15%. If we take the figure of 17% as an average 
we will see that Russia's non-oil industry contributes significantly to 
GDP. 
Let's consider the effect of hypothetical factors (a lack of oil) on the 
Russian budget. Certainly, the budget would be smaller, for it is funded 
by real money. The less the financial returns, the less the spending. The 
hypothetical budget would be 25% smaller without oil. 
Today, half of the revenue side of the budget comes from oil and gas 
proceeds. Four years ago the index was 23.4%, half what it is today. Oil 
and gas proceeds consist of revenues from tariffs and taxes, including on 
the profits of oil and gas companies, oil companies' dividends on 
state-owned shares and proceeds from state-controlled oil companies active 
abroad. Excess profits are channeled into the Stabilization Fund and have 
almost no direct influence on the economy. 
Last year, according to Russian Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin, 70% of oil 
revenues went to the Stabilization Fund. This year 74.4%, and in 2009 
67.1% will be channeled there. The minister proposes cutting the use of 
oil revenues to 2.8% of GDP. Some Russian economists like the idea, others 
oppose it, but it is very hard to predict the future now. 
A thesis could be written on the "Russia-without-oil" topic. One 
conclusion seems to be that Russia is one of the world's few 
self-sufficient countries. In the transition period, Russia managed to 
retain government control of key spheres by creating effective state 
monopolies and laid a foundation for a powerful private sector. The 
setback in production resulting from economic reform is over, and the 
country is on the rise now. Today, the Russian economy can survive without 
oil, and the country's great intellectual potential gives rise to the hope 
that the commodities giant can transform itself into an exporter of high 
technologies. 
Of course, there will come a time when oil deposits will be exhausted, but 
hopefully the Russian economy will then be driven by nanotechnologies, 
robot automation, space technologies and new materials. 
 
-- 
visitate 
http://www.comunisti-italiani.it/frames/index.htm
http://cubainforma.interfree.it/
il film sul 9/11 : 
http://www.loosechange911.com/
http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/Berlin.jpg
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 hopefully the Russian economy will then be driven by nanotechnologies
Goccie di petrolio, trucioli di legno, briciole di carbone.
Le nanotecnologie made in Russia. Hopefully. LOL.
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 wrote in message
news:kJkLg.96205$_J1.8...@twister2.libero.it...

STRUAOROUTFLUOL!!!
Famme ripijia fiato, coglione, e ripensa alla cazzata che hai scritto !
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Giano

 tubi buttati (almeno credo) e al collo il nodo dell'Algeria.
Un rigassificatore in Italia c'è, e me l'hanno messo in giardino insieme
ad una discarica, una centrale a carbone, ed a una raffineria.
Nel golfo più bello d'Italia...
-- 
Davide

 Nel golfo più bello d'Italia...
Sei napoletano?
Palmiro Pangloss

Nel golfo piů bello d'Italia...
Tranquillo che come si torna al nucleare si compra una bella Centrale
Atomica sovietica in disuso e te la si pianta nel cesso.
MMAX
-- 
E' in discussione su it.news.gruppi la RFD 
di it.politica.internazionale moderato

 Nel golfo più bello d'Italia...
Beh, ha pure l'acqua fosforescente. Di che ti lamenti?
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Vuoi un po' di Alta Velocità?
Ci metterei anche la base di sub nucleari USA che vogliono togliere da
La Maddalena, non crera il minimo disturbo e crea un sacco di posti di
lavoro in bar e bordelli.
Palmiro Pangloss

 Sei napoletano?
Fanculo Palmiro :-)
-- 
Davide

 Atomica sovietica in disuso e te la si pianta nel cesso.
Oh, però con qualche crepa nel reattore, se no non lo vogliamo.
-- 
Davide

 Beh, ha pure l'acqua fosforescente. Di che ti lamenti?
Bashtardi
-- 
Davide

Oh, perň con qualche crepa nel reattore, se no non lo vogliamo.
Ovvio, la facciamo scegliere a quelli di Report.


 indietro nel tempo)
Vero. L'ho fatto una volta. Morivo dal ridere.
Non che le linee costiere...
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

Palmiro Pangloss wrote:

Quella è davvero una figata.
Ma l'ultima volta che ho sentito, mi pareva che gli abitanti dell'Isola si 
opponessero allo spostamento.
O sognavo?
Tb
-- 
www.tonibaruch.blogspot.com

 Fanculo Palmiro :-)
Torre del Greco?
Palmiro Pangloss

 Torre del Greco?
Fate gli spiritosi...
Vi faccio preparare una bella tagliatella col boletus satana...
-- 
Davide

 opponessero allo spostamento.
In genere i sardi ne hanno le palle piene delle servitu' militari, ma
su La Maddalena in particolare non ho notizie precise.
Palmiro Pangloss

 wrote:

AFAIK i sardi son solo che felici per l'andata via degli americani,
anche perchè di indotto ce n'era molto meno di quanto non ne possa
portare il turismo prossimo venturo.


 portare il turismo prossimo venturo.
E' ovvio, basta che per sviluppare il turismo non tritino tutto.
Palmiro Pangloss