Newsgroup: it.politica.internazionale
Titolo: Anders Behring Breivik claims victims were not innocent

E' difficile pensare che costui non sia pazzo: quello che ha fatto, e 
che rivendica come giusto diritto, è troppo ripugnante perché si riesca 
a cuor leggero ad attribuirlo ad una mente sana.  Il giudizio sulla 
natura umana che ne deriva è troppo duro da accettare.
Tuttavia è necessario pensare che la mente di Breivik sia sana.  Ad 
affermare questa necessità, più che una diagnosi psichiatrica, è la 
memoria storica di ciò che è stato il nazismo, quando non una ma 
migliaia di persone commisero l'impensabile, e milioni di altre ne 
certificarono la sanità mentale.
 
Breivik, come tanti allora, assorbirono senza filtri i liquami di una 
ideologia di morte elaborata per essere funzionale al Potere.
 
Nella psiche di Breivik si è riversata tutta la merda che il Potere ha 
creato per assicurarsi la sua presa sulle masse, ad iniziare 
dall'anticomunismo viscerale, alla lurida retorica sullo scontro di 
civiltà, all'invettiva anti islamica, all'individualismo efficientista 
usato per sfondare le conquiste di decenni di lotte operaie, al 
reaganismo portabandiera dei potentati economici, al sistematico 
rovesciamento della verità dei portatori di democrazia e di civiltà che 
massacrano e distruggono come barbari.  Il tutto reso possibile dalla 
complicità di un sistema mediatico che ha ammazzato la democrazia e il 
pluralismo.
 
Breivik ha solo assorbito tutto questo, e lo ha portato alle sue estreme 
conseguenze.
 
-------------------------------------
Anders Behring Breivik claims victims were not innocent
 
Helen Pidd in Oslo
guardian.co.uk
, Tuesday 17 April 2012 11.57 BST
Anders Behring Breivik has described his killing spree last summer as 
"the most sophisticated and spectacular political attack committed in 
Europe since the second world war".
 
The 33-year-old made the claims in a written statement he was allowed to 
read to the court on the second day of his trial – an unusual demand 
granted only because he refused to give evidence conventionally otherwise.
 
The rambling text, which he claimed he had "self censored" out of 
respect for the bereaved sitting in court, attempted to justify what he 
had done in the name of "revolutionary nationalism".
 
He expressed no regret for planning and carrying out the attacks that 
left 77 dead last summer. Maintaining he acted out of "goodness, not 
evil" to prevent a "major civil war", Breivik insisted: "I would have 
done it again."
 
He identified as his enemy the "cultural Marxists" who he said had 
destroyed Norway by using it as "a dumping ground for the surplus births 
of the third world". Claiming Norwegians would be a minority in their 
own capital "within five years", he blamed liberal politicians for 
bringing about Norway's demise with "feminism, quotas … transforming the 
church, schools".
 
The 69 people, many of them teenagers, who died on the island of Utøya 
when he opened fire on the youth camp of the ruling Labour party were 
"not innocent", he claimed.
 
"They were not innocent, non-political children; these were young people 
who worked to actively uphold multicultural values. Many people had 
leading positions in the leading Labour party youth wing," he said, 
going on to compare the Labour party's youth wing (AUF) with the Hitler 
Youth.
 
He quoted from a variety of sources to support his case, including, he 
said, a story written in the Times in February 2010 which he said 
reported that "three out of five Englishmen believe that the UK has 
turned into a dysfunctional society as a result of multiculturalism". 
The Guardian was unable to find evidence of such an article.
 
Breivik told the court that "ridiculous" lies had been told about him, 
rattling off a list which accused him of being a narcissist who was 
obsessed with the red jumper he wore to his first court hearing, of 
having a "bacterial phobia", "an incestuous relationship with my 
mother", "of being a child killer despite no one who died on Utøya being 
under 14".
 
He was not insane, he repeated many times. He claimed it was Norway's 
politicians who should be locked up in the sort of mental institution in 
which he can expect to spend the rest of his life if the court declares 
him criminally insane at the end of the 10-week trial.
 
Breivik said: "They expect us to applaud our ethnic and cultural doom … 
They should be characterised as insane, not me. Why is this the real 
insanity? This is the real insanity because it is not rational to work 
to deconstruct one's own ethnic group, culture and religion."
 
Breivik insisted he was not alone in fighting against "mass 
immigration". He singled out as examples the National Socialist 
Underground, the neo-Nazi terror cell responsible for killing nine 
immigrants and one policewoman in Germany, and Peter Mangs, the man 
suspected of carrying out a seven-year killing spree in the Swedish city 
of Malmö.
 
He said that these "heroic young people" should be celebrated for 
sacrificing their lives for the conservative revolution. He said that 
"the three most powerful politicians in Europe" shared his views, 
saying: "Sarkozy, Merkel and Cameron have all noted that 
multiculturalism doesn't work."
 
At the start of Tuesday's court session, one of the five judges was 
dismissed from the panel after it emerged he had posted a message on 
Facebook last year saying the "death penalty is the only just thing to 
do in this case". Thomas Indebro, 33, one of three ordinary Norwegians 
sitting as a "lay judge" alongside two professionals, stepped down and 
was replaced.
 
Breivik has five days to explain why he set off a bomb in Oslo's 
government district, killing eight, and then gunned down 69 on Utøya. He 
denies criminal guilt, saying he was acting out of "necessity". On 
Tuesday the court-appointed interpreters issued a correction to their 
translation of Breivik's not guilty plea on Monday.
 
He is not claiming to have acted out of "self defence", as originally 
reported, but using a defence under section 47 of the Norwegian penal 
code, which states: "No person may be punished for any act that he has 
committed in order to save someone's person or property from an 
otherwise unavoidable danger when the circumstances justified him in 
regarding this danger as particularly significant in relation to the 
damage that might be caused by his act."
 
-- 
Sostieni Rete ECO
 
http://rete-eco.it/it/sostienici.html
 
 

 conseguenze.
 
92 minuti di applausi. Lo vedi che non devi perdere tempo a beccarti
coi fessi ?