Newsgroup: it.scienza.ambiente
Titolo: Stasera 12/01/08 alle 20:10 su RAI3 CONTROINFORMAZIONE SU RIFIUTI

Stasera RAI 3 ore 20:10: CONTROINFORMAZIONE SU RIFIUTI FAI GIRARE
Finalmente una voce in TV che INFORMA
Luca Mercalli alla trasmissione "Che tempo fa" alle 20.10 farà
controinformazione sui rifiuti:
-riduzione
-differenziata porta a porta
-riciclaggio e recupero
L'unica via per tutelare salute, economia e lavoro.
-- 
Alessandro
-------------------------------------------
"There is no dark side of the moon, really...
as a matter of fact it's all dark."
PinK FloYd
-------------------------------------------

 Luca Mercalli
Il solo citare il nome di quel pezzo di merda me li fa girare.

 Il solo citare il nome di quel pezzo di merda me li fa girare.
perchč? manco t'avesse trombato la morosa...  :-)
A.


Non ho dove sia la CONTRO informazione.
Sono le solite informazioni che fanno i verdi da anni, compreso
Pecoraro, salvo poi cambiare idea quando una delle piu' grandi città
italiane si trova nella merda grazia alla loro politica.
E hanno pure la faccia tosta di insistere quando perfino il loor capo
deve cambiare idea?
E' chiaro che non tutto puo' essere riciclato, ridotto, differenziato.
La latrina che avanza fatela mangiare a questo Mercalli
ciao
M

 deve cambiare idea?
Sara' perche' sto diventando vecchio, ma ho la sensazione
che il fatto che la ggente finisca invariabilmente per
lamentarsi di cose che e' stata lei stessa a esigere a gran
voce e ad ogni costo, senza rendersi minimamente conto delle
contropartite che ne sarebbero derivate, anche quando il
rapporto di causa effetto parrebbe del tutto trasparente, mi
pare esteso un po' a tutte le cosiddette comodita' moderne.
Mi fan sorridere anche quelli che hanno la soluzione in
tasca per salvare il mondo. Il mondo non vuole minimamente
essere salvato.


In Austria al termodistruttore ci mandano solo il 12%, il resto che ne
fanno? se lo ficcano su per il Chiulo? Non so... dimmi te GRANDE
ESPERTONE...
Ah per la cronaca nel mio paese:
http://comunicati.asmprato.it/comunicato.asp?hdnTipo=1&hdnId=5224
Imparate CAPRONI! :-D



Allora che affoghi nella M€rd@ no?
Dov'e' il problema?
Di che stiamo a discutere?


 Imparate CAPRONI! :-D
Figurati, se e' per questo dalle nostri parti quei valori o
quasi sono estesi su un'area di circa 15 milioni di
abitanti, non  di 3000 anime...
Cio' non implica che sia una cosa utile e giusta, solo che
la ggente e' piu' civile e disciplinata.

 Di che stiamo a discutere?
La sostanza del discorso, esplicitata, avrebbe voluto essere:
chi e' causa del suo mal, pianga se stesso.

by imprisonment for it,
though their sin was forced upon them. This was "protection" from the
official standpoint.
Mr. Labouchere had replied with his approval of this Ordinance dealing
with contagious diseases due to vice, as though the application for
the measure had been made in behalf of the slaves of Hong Kong. Such
was not the case. The enclosures in Sir John Bowring's despatch had
been a sensational description of the urgent need of vicious men for
the active protection of the Government from the consequences of
their vices. Later, a Commission of Inquiry into the working of this
Ordinance comments upon official statements as to the satisfactory
consequences of the enactment of the measure in the checking of
disease. The Commission demonstrates that in many instances their
statements were absolute falsehoods, as proved by statements made by
the same officials elsewhere. Since these officials are proved to have
been so untruthful after the passing of the Ordinance, we can put no
reliance on their statements previous to its enactments, and the
more so because the statistics for Hong Kong in its early days are
hopelessly confused with the general statistics for all China,
wherever British soldiers or sailors were to be found. Therefore they
are unavailable for citation. But as to statements made after the
passage of the Ordinance, we append a compilation, as set forth by Dr.
Birkbeck Nevins of Liverpool, England.
    SHAMELESS AND YET OFFICIALLY-SANCTIONED FALSEHOOD IN PUBLISHING
    OFFICIALLY UTTERLY UNTRUE STATISTICS IN FAVOUR OF THE C.D. ACTS IN
    THE BRITISH COLONY OF HONG KONG WITH THE SANCTION AND AUTHORITY OF
    THE COLONIAL GOVERNOR.
    "Referring to the Colonial Surgeon's Department, we feel bound
    to point out that those portions of the _Annual Medical Reports_
    which refer to the subject of the Lock Hospital _have, in too many
    i

handed one of
    these prisoners to the police, and that afterward an agent of the
    Chinese Society to suppress this class of crime caused the arrest
    and conviction of these prisoners. These facts are indicative of
    the public mind tending to treat kidnaping as a crime against
    society, calling for active suppression. On the same occasion, in
    sentencing a woman who had severely beaten an adopted child, Sir
    John Smale said, 'In finally disposing of these three cases, with
    all their enormity, sources of satisfaction present themselves in
    the fact that, in each of these cases, it has been owing to the
    spontaneous indignation of Chinese men and women that these crimes
    have been brought to the knowledge of the police.' The Governor
    closes his letter with the statement, 'It is only due to Sir John
    Smale to add that his own action has greatly contributed to foster
    the "healthy" public opinion of the native community, which
    induced him, when quitting the Supreme Court, to take a hopeful
    view of the future of this important subject.'"
CHAPTER 12.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE ANSWERS HIS OPPONENTS.
The Acting Attorney General at the time of Sir John Smale's first
pronouncement against slavery had suggested to Governor Hennessy that
Sir John Smale's statements should be sent to London to the Secretary
of State for the Colonies; and he and other advisers recommended that
no prosecutions in connection with "adoption" and "domestic servitude"
should be instituted, pending the receipt of instructions from the
Home Government. The Chief Justice concurred in these views, and also
suggested that the Chinese be told that no prosecutions as to the past
should take place, but that in future, in every case where _buying and
selling_ occur