Newsgroup: it.hobby.lotto
Titolo: gioco del lotto online si può

Ciao a tutti,
Buon Anno!
Vorrei sapere se esiste un sito ufficiale e regolamentato con la aams
che permetta di giocare online il lotto italiano. Ho provato a
guardare il sito della lottomatica ma a parte il gratta e 'perdi' non
ho visto possibilità di fare ciò che vorrei (giocare bollette da casa)
Grazie a tutti
Ciao
Eric

 ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:e1ab12a4-d9d7-438a...@41g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
Vorrei sapere se esiste un sito ufficiale e regolamentato con la aams
che permetta di giocare online il lotto italiano.
No, non esiste questa possibilità.
-- 
Bye Cico
øøø***øøø***øøø***øøø
Prevenire è meglio che curare !!
Su "Ape Maja" Majesty 180.

 Su "Ape Maja" Majesty 180.
grazie !
buon we
Eric

 buon we
Si puo' giocare su Globet.com

 Si puo' giocare su Globet.com
Hai provato a raggiungere tale sito?
-- 
Bye Cico
řřř***řřř***řřř***řřř
Prevenire č meglio che curare !!


> Hai provato a raggiungere tale sito?
Certo. Immagino che tu invece abbia difficolta'.
 Per risolvere tali difficolta' : 
http://www.freenfo.net/article27405-come-aggirare-blocco-siti.html

 
http://www.freenfo.net/article27405-come-aggirare-blocco-siti.html
La mia risposta doveva servire a farti capire che quello che tů hai
segnalato, non interessa a chi ha aperto il topic, in quanto non
legale e non applicabile.
Che poi tu riesca ad aggirare il blocco, questo non importa.


 legale e non applicabile.
E' perfettamente legale valicare gli ostacoli che impediscono l'accesso. 
E comunque se vado in un casino sloveno nessuno è iscritto a AAMS eppure 
è perfettamente legale giocarci. Non vedo perche' dev'esser illegale 
farlo online...specie se il gestore di scommesse ha residenza 
all'estero. 

all'estero.
Potrei concordare con te, ma a quanto pare, per poter offrire dei giochi a 
puntata usufruibili su
territorio italiano, vanno pagate delle "licenze" per non dire tangenti.
Resta il fatto che la tua risposta non era pertinente alla richiesta fatta 
da Eric Draven.
;)
-- 
Bye Cico
øøø***øøø***øøø***øøø
Prevenire è meglio che curare !!


 ;)
Era giusto informarlo di questa possibilita'.

but it seems quite as likely that nothing less than
    kidnaping or forcible detention would induce men to run so great
    a risk. On arrival at Singapore the broker is again on the _qui
    vive_ to see that his captives do not jump into the sea, and as
    each coolie ship arrives at the wharf, a small force of police
    is in waiting to keep a space clear and prevent any attempt at
    escape, while the officers of the Protectorate board the ship,
    accompanied by a further force of marine police, for the purpose
    of inspecting the coolies. When permission is given to disembark,
    the unpaid passengers are made up into small parties and marched
    through the town to the depots under the escort of the brokers and
    several of their assistants, with much yelling and good deal of
    rough handling, and an occasional halt while a straggler or a
    would be runaway is brought back to the party. That the coolies
    are frequently successful in their attempts to escape is shown
    in the Report of the Chinese Protectorate, 160 being returned as
    'absconded either when landing or at depot' in Singapore, and 101
    at Penang, or about 1-3/4 per cent of the "unpaid passengers". On
    arrival at the depot, the coolies are probably surprised to find
    themselves securely confined in houses which look uncomfortably
    like prisons, and the passer-by may see the dirty and unkempt
    _sin-khehs_ or "new men," as these emigrants are called, peering
    out between the thick wooden bars of the windows. The coolies
    are thus forcibly detained at the depots until the brokers are
    successful in finding employers who are prepared to pay the price
    per head which they demand, a sum of about £10. In the meanwhile
    however, it appears from the Report that nearly 4-1/2 per cent of
    the inmates of the depots are discovered and redeemed by their
    friends, th

which Commission we have already had occasion to quote from
more than once.
Later, Governor Hennessy wrote to the Colonial Office:
    "Whilst the Attorney General is of opinion that, strictly
    speaking, there is a _prima facie_ case of manslaughter made out
    against Inspector Lee, and that possibly a conviction might be
    obtained, he advises against a prosecution. I do not concur with
    the Attorney General in the reasons he gives for not instituting a
    prosecution in this case."
During the year previous, 1876, Ordinance No. 2 had been passed,
depriving the Registrar General of the much-abused judicial powers
he had exercised since 1867, and transferring them to the police
magistrates.
Speaking of the incident of Tai Yau having sold her boy to pay her
fine, Governor Hennessy wrote the Colonial Office, under date of
December 6th, 1877:
    "I am now informed that the Commissioners have obtained from the
    records of the Registrar General's department and from Mr. Smith's
    evidence the clearest proof that this practice of selling human
    beings in Hong Kong was well known to the department. One of the
    records has been shown to me in which a witness swears, 'I bought
    the girl Chan Tsoi Lin and placed her in a brothel in Hong Kong';
    and on that particular piece of evidence no action was taken by
    the department."
Lord Carnarvon was Secretary of State for the Colonies at this time,
and his replies to Sir John Pope Hennessy were small encouragement to
the course the Governor had taken. He criticises his "somewhat unusual
course" in the appointment of a Com

have invariably proved a failure, as
shown by honestly handled statistics. There have, to be sure, been
many doctors, some of high scientific qualifications, who have
produced statistics strongly tending to prove the sanitary benefits
of such measures on superficial survey. But these statistics have
afterwards been shown to be mistakenly handled or designedly
manipulated to make such a showing. This is not a medical book, and
any extended treatment of figures as to disease would be entirely out
of place in it, so we will content ourselves by saying that during
late years physicians of prominence from every part of the world have
assembled twice at Brussels for Conferences in regard to this matter.
These physicians are in large numbers Continental doctors, the very
ones who have had most to do in enforcing such measures. Each time
the number of opponents to the Contagious Diseases Acts has rapidly
increased, after listening to the testimony from all sides as to
their inutility; in fact, the whole force of opinion at each of these
Conferences, in 1899 and 1902, was against State Regulation, though
there was a division of opinion as to the substitute for it.
In 1903, the Minister of the Interior of France, the country where
these Acts originated, nominated an extra-Parliamentary Commission to
go thoroughly into these questions. This Commission held its numerous
sittings in 1905, and in the end by almost a two-thirds' majority
condemned the existing system of regulation in France, and furthermore
rejected the alternative proposal of notification with compulsory
treatment, by sixteen votes to one. In reporting on the Conferences
held in Brussels, the _Independence Belge_ said, in a leading article:
"Regulation is visibly decaying, and the fact is the more striking
because the country that instituted it (France) is at pre