Newsgroup: it.comp.hardware.video-3d
Titolo: M'I`5 Pers ecution   abuse  in set-up  sit uations and  in publi c

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= abuse. in set-up situations and in public -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Strangers in the street have recognized me. on sight many times, and shown
awareness of the current thread of. abuse. To give you one example, in 1992
I. was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humorously said that
"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I. attended
for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient,. and on my way out
was accosted by. someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis
on the word "fare". He repeated the word several. times in this different
context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time. emphasizing the
word.
For two and a half years from the time their harassment. started until
November 1992 I refused. to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I
was not ill of my own action or fault,. but through the stress caused by
harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have. to be consequent
to a removal of its immediate cause,. in other words a cessation of
harassment.. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes
about mental illness, if I. were to seek treatment then the abusers would
think that they had. "won" and been proved "right". Remember, the constant
theme of any persecution. is, "we must destroy you because you're X",
whether X is a racial or other attribute.. In this case the X was "we
persecute. you because you have brain disease". The similarity of this logic
to Nazi attitudes to the mentally. ill is striking.
The same manager who'd said "it wasn't fair" asked. me in winter 1992 why I
didn't seek help from. a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would
think they had won" if. I sought treatment? That was something I'd never
said at. work... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such
things. over a period of months proves conclusively that people in the
company knew what was going on, and in quite a lot of. detail.
Usually harassment in. public lacks the level of finesse of "paying your
fare". Most people's imagination does not go beyond. moronic parroting of
the current term of denigration. That is not. surprising given the average
level of the abusers;. if they do not have the intelligence to distinguish
wrong from right then neither will they have the. capacity for anything
other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term calculated to. fit
into. their minds.
The first incidents. of verbal assault in public were in again in the summer
of. 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom with time. In July
1990 the first public incident occurred on a tube train. on the Northern
line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised. me; the women sprang to my
defence, saying "He looks. perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill". Their
boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the party. line; one of them
made reference to an "operation", apparently to work at. the tube station
but. implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a couple of weeks
previously.
In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting on. a tube train
at. Gloucester Road I was followed by a group of four youths, who started a
chant of abuse. That they were targeting me was confirmed. by other people
in the carriage, one of whom asked the other "who are they. going on at, is
it the bloke who. just got on?" to which the second replied "yes, I think
so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every other instance the. abusers are
enabled in. their cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused; any
confrontation would result in my being beaten. up, followed by a complaint
to the police that "he attacked. us", and of course he's ill, so he must
have been imagining that we were getting at. him. Shitty, aren't they?
But the shittiness of the. four youths on the tube train is as nothing
compared to the. episode on the National Express coach to Dover in the
summer of 1992. While going. on holiday to the Continent I was verbally set
upon by a. couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the
talking, his female companion contributing only. a continuous empty giggling
noise. He spoke loudly to ensure other. people on the coach heard, always
about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming. either the abusers or the
person he was talking about.. He said "they" had "found somebody from his
school, and. he was always really stressed at school". They must have dug
deep. to find enemies there; perhaps someone who dropped out of school,
someone who didn't do. too well later, who was jealous and keen to get their
own. back? The boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast for only one
night and they got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had. been in a
B&B in Oxford. a week previously, which had been booked from work; other
things lead me to. the conclusion that the company's offices were bugged for
most of the 2 1/2. years that I was there, so "they" would have known a room
in the B&B had been booked. (But I'll bet "they" didn't tell the. company's
managers their offices were bugged,. did they?).
After a few minutes of this I went back to where they. were sitting and
asked where they were travelling. The boy named a. village in France, and
the girl's. giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated to her brain
cell what the purpose of the boy's. abuse was.
This and. other set-up situations are obviously calculated to provoke a
direct confrontation which would bring in the police, with. the abusers
claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again. in 1992, outside the
house where I was living. in Oxford I was physically attacked by someone -
not punched, just. grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good
measure.. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known
about... but. soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of
me about, "I heard he was attacked".. The UK police have a responsibility
for preventing assault occurring, but they do not. seem to take any interest
in meeting that responsibility. I. suppose their attitude is that harassment
does not come within their remit unless it involves. physical assault, and
they will only. become involved once that happens. That is of course quite
the wrong attitude for them to take,. but as I now understand, the police
investigate only the crime they. wish to investigate; if they do not take
your complaints seriously then there is nothing you can do. to make them
take. action.
3628

and bring men into the worship of the true God.
That the temples of the idols would be cast down, and that among all nations
and in all places of the earth. He would be offered a pure sacrifice, not of
beasts.
That He would be king of the Jews and Gentiles. And we see this king of the
Jews and Gentiles oppressed by both, who conspire His death; and ruler of
both, destroying the worship of Moses in Jerusalem, which was its centre,
where He made His first Church; and also the worship of idols in Rome, the
centre of it, where He made His chief Church.
731. Prophecies.--That Jesus Christ will sit on the right hand, till God has
subdued His enemies.
Therefore He will not subdue them Himself.
732. "... Then they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, saying,
Here is the Lord, for God shall make Himself known to all."
"... Your sons shall prophesy." "I will put my spirit and my fear in your
heart."
All that is the same thing. To prophesy is to speak of God, not from outward
proofs, but from an inward and immediate feeling.
733. That He would teach men the perfect way.
And there has never come, before Him nor after Him, any man who has taught
anything divine approaching to this.
734.... That Jesus Christ would be small in His beginning, and would then
increase. The little stone of Daniel.
If I had in no wise heard of the Messiah, nevertheless, after such wonderful
predictions of the course of the world which I see fulfilled, I see that He
is divine. And, if I knew that these same books foretold a Messiah, I should
be sure that He would come; and seeing that they place His time before the
destruction of the second temple, I s