Newsgroup: it.cultura.religioni
Titolo: Naturalmente , sarà finito all'inferno...

 
 
    ... I read a great deal in the last days of your book, and thank you
very much for sending it to me. What especially struck me about it was
this. With regard to the factual attitude to life and to the human
community we have a great deal in common.
 
    ... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and
product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but
still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No
interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These
subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature
and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish
religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish
superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with
whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me
than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no
better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst
cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about
them.
 
    In general I find it painful that you claim a privileged position and
try to defend it by two walls of pride, an external one as a man and an
internal one as a Jew. As a man you claim, so to speak, a dispensation
from causality otherwise accepted, as a Jew the privilege of monotheism.
But a limited causality is no longer a causality at all, as our wonderful
Spinoza recognized with all incision, probably as the first one. And the
animistic interpretations of the religions of nature are in principle not
annulled by monopolization. With such walls we can only attain a certain
self-deception, but our moral efforts are not furthered by them. On the
contrary.
 
    Now that I have quite openly stated our differences in intellectual
convictions it is still clear to me that we are quite close to each other
in essential things, i.e; in our evaluations of human behavior. What
separates us are only intellectual 'props' and 'rationalization' in
Freud's language. Therefore I think that we would understand each other
quite well if we talked about concrete things.
 
    With friendly thanks and best wishes,
    Yours, A. Einstein
 
 
 
 
-- 
 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it
 
 
 

 ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:k4n1jr$a6c$1...@news.newsland.it...

..Pensa che tanti pecoroni credono di saperne molto pi� di Einstein..
Ciao
Gigio c'� 
 


 
S.M.
 


 
Mi piacerebbe sentire i commenti degli scientisti atei che qui non
mancano, sul fatto che un loro mito sa stato profondamente religioso.


 mancano, sul fatto che un loro mito sa stato profondamente religioso.
 
 
Mi pare che Einstein abbia definito se stesso, in prima persona, e direi
meglio di quanto possa fare questo tizio, non proprio osservatore
imparziale...


 S.M
 
Per fortuna nostra, scripta manent...


 mancano, sul fatto che un loro mito sa stato profondamente religioso.
 
 
 
caro il mio catto-iddiota
perchè volete sempre portare gli altri sul vostro basso livello ?
voi avete un mito, e per questo e solo per questo dovrebbero averlo 
anche gli atei ? perchè solo ccosì vi sentite giustificati nei vostri 
atteggiamenti superstiziosi ?
 
noi non abbiamo miti ma semplicemente dei punti di riferimento 
credibili  e soprattutto visibili, l'esatto contrario dlle vostre 
assurde posizioni di creduloni nel nulla e nei fantasmi