Newsgroup: it.cultura.religioni
Titolo: Re: Torino, scorie radioattive in zona politecnico e alla crocetta .

 m.
Fatevi il Dianazene alzando piano piano la dose affinche la niacina non 
fa diventare rossa (nel limite) la pelle, dopo ca 7 giorni la natura vi 
ha messo un muro di berlino per le radiazioni.
http://www.google.com/search?q=Dianazene
sono solo vitamine non pillole colorate
Dianazene
But we are leading on this. We knew that old-time nicotinic acid 
restimulated and ran out sunburns and that a person who had been given 
nicotinic acid actually did not receive a continuous effect from it. 
Anybody can make this test.
It happens that there is an incorrect entry in both the British and 
American pharmacopoeias. It says that nicotinic acid-not 
niacinamide—turns on a flush, and in overdose is therefore toxic. This 
is not correct. People who have taken nicotinic acid in overdoses do get 
red and prickly but one has to take about 90 grains to kill oneself.
It is fascinating that there could be this insufficient information. It 
could be that people don't look because that isn't what it does at all. 
In a large number of cases it doesn't turn on flushes but turns on 
hives, gastroenteritis, aching bones, or a fearful, terrified condition 
which is not a physical reaction at all. Here is a variable reaction 
from something toxic-and notice that it turns on the conditions brought 
about by atomic radiation.
What sort of a toxic pill is this which when administered over a period 
of time is no longer toxic even though all the time it is being 
administered it is above toleration? The body cannot tolerate the amount 
that is being administered but after a while it no longer has any 
effect. Unless one knows Dianetics and Scientology this doesn't seem to 
make much sense.
Nicotinic acid runs out, abolishes, sunburns—and that is the simple 
answer to this question. When it is given to a person, he gets sunburns 
he has already had before and turns as red as a beet. Keep him on a 
regimented dose every day and after a while two things will happen: one, 
he no longer gets sick when nicotinic acid is administered to him and, 
two, he doesn't have a bad reaction from sunburn.
We have made the test with sunlamps and found that a person's liability 
to being burned is decreased by the administration of nicotinic acid and 
the running out of past burns. This, therefore, is true of this type of 
radiation illness.
I conducted several experiments in 1950 which were in total disagreement 
with the pharmacopoeia, but any medical doctor or biochemist could make 
the same experiments. One would administer 200 mg nicotinic acid per day 
to somebody and see all the manifestations I have spoken earlier, turn 
on, eventually disappear and not recur until one has administered about 
500 mg per day, which will turn it all on again, but much less this 
time. Then one gives this person 1,000 mg per day for several days and 
finds that there is just a small reaction after which one administers 
2,000 mg per day and Finds no more effects. One can thus feed people 
this toxic drug without any effect whatsoever.
Remembering this series of experiments I made in 1950 I again looked 
them up in the files of the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation. More 
recently we got some brave volunteer who took nicotinic acid over a 
period of a couple of weeks and sure enough our old experiments were 
bearing out with one exception: the reactions per dose were five and six 
times more violent than they had been in 1950!
I then got hold of some of the people who were given nicotinic acid in 
1950 and they took the same course all over again. They got a little 
sick in their stomachs but were better off than other people and they 
got an entirely different reaction.
In order to make the intake of nicotinic acid more effective, I did more 
experimenting and eventually combined it with vitamins and other 
minerals and finally produced a formula called Dianazene.
The Formula for Dianazene
Nicotinic Acid200 mg.
Iron Ferrous Gluconate10 grains.
Vitamin B125 mg.
Vitamin B2 -Riboflavin50 mg.
Vitamin C-Ascorbic Acid200 to 500 mg.
Dicalcium Phosphate15 to 20 grains.
It should be taken daily, all at the same time, with milk and chocolate. 
But it is not the best solution. It is a cure. It does something and it 
can eventually be run out with Scientology. But if we didn't have 
anything else Dianazene might serve the purpose very well in a limited 
sense.
Dianazene runs out radiation—or what appears to be radiation. It also 
proofs a person up against radiation in some degree. I have seen it run 
out skin cancer. A man who didn't have much liability to skin cancer 
(only had a few moles) took Dianazene. His whole jaw turned into a raw 
mass of cancer. He kept on taking Dianazene and it disappeared after a 
while. I was looking at a case of cancer that might have happened.
There is another instance of somebody who had a little bit of colitis 
which worried him slightly from time to time. After taking Dianazene he 
started to bleed from the intestines. He kept on taking this formula and 
came out without colitis. He may have been facing an eventual colitis of 
a fatal nature-hemorrhages.
The whole point in taking Dianazene is to keep taking it until bad 
effects vanish.
As the level of food intake from country to country varies, it is 
important that people who don't eat regular wholesome food take milk and 
chocolate with this preparation, otherwise they get a very poor reaction 
to it. I found that if one took milk and chocolate with it—or milk and 
glucose-it worked much better. In other words, the people who are the 
poorest fed would evidently be the most susceptible to radiation.
However, there could be thousands of other factors involved. If we are 
alert there is no reason to worry about radiation at this time 
particularly. But there is the same old worry about the case and health 
level of the peoples of the Earth, and if we continue along in this same 
direction, we would also win in the face of radiation. Who knows that we 
wouldn't get a plague tomorrow that would wipe out nations. I assure you 
that it would be the people who are worried and are in a bad state of 
health who would go down first.
If one wanted to get the better of the plague, whether man or bug made, 
one should be audited by Scientology technologies. That seems to me 
about all I could say offhand that one might find of use in the 
understanding and handling of atomic radiation.
Nuclear Radiation
The effects of radiations depend basically on their property of 
rendering atoms in their path electrically charged. This is called 
ionization. The immediate result in the molecules, of which the ionized 
atoms are part, is increased chemical activity and a tendency to break 
up. Thus the living structure of the cell is altered or destroyed, and 
poisonous waste products may be formed. These changes, if on a 
sufficiently large scale, and in vital organs, can cause the death of 
the whole body.
The ionizing power of radiation depends on its energy. Alpha and beta 
particles are far more effective than gamma rays, but fortunately have 
very little penetrating power. Neutrons have quite high ionizing power, 
and penetrate easily as well. Dosages of radiation are measured in terms 
of total ionization, the unit being the "roentgen" (r). It is difficult 
to gain any subjective appreciation of what is meant by a dose of say 
500 r, but the following observations give some idea:-The lethal dose 
for a human being, if received uniformly over the whole body, is about 
750 r. That is to say, that such a dose could be expected to kill 100% 
of persons exposed to it, and is called an LD100 dose. It would be 
received by a person standing in the open at about 800 yards from ground 
zero in the case of a nominal bomb blast. An amount of 450 r, such as 
would be received up to 1,300 yards or so, would kill about 50% of 
persons exposed; it is thus an LD50 dose. Less than 200 r is not 
ordinarily fatal, unless the victim is already weakened from some other 
cause, or has received burns or blast injury as well.
About 50% of people exposed to a single dose of 200 r, however, could 
become quite ill, and might take anything up to three months to recover. 
100 r produces about 10% sickness only, and less than 50 r in one dose 
can be taken as relatively harmless, provided there is no further 
exposure for many weeks, at least.
It will be obvious from the above that a good deal of individual 
variation occurs, but beyond the observation that the very young, the 
old, and the ill are more sensitive than normal, nothing is known of the 
reasons for the variations.
Much greater amounts of radiation than the above can be tolerated, if 
directed to specific parts of the body only, as for example in 
radiotherapy for cancer. On the other hand, much smaller doses, 
delivered to the whole body, do produce some ill effects, and 
furthermore, accumulate over a period of time. The sensitivity of human 
tissues decreases in this order: lymphatic tissue, testis, bone marrow 
(blood forming tissue), epithelium (lining) of the stomach and 
intestines, ovary. Brain and muscle are the least sensitive of all, and 
other tissues fall in between the two ranges. 1000 r to brain only is 
not lethal. On the other hand, 0.2 r per day over a period has been 
known to depress blood formation in workers with X-rays. The maximum 
safe continuous rate of irradiation for such people is now considered to 
be about 0.1 per day for five days a week. While a total dose 
accumulated over a long period is not as dangerous as the same dose 
given in a short time, radiation effects do nevertheless accumulate. In 
actual fact 60 r spread over three weeks is no more effective than 20 r 
as a single rapid dose. Nevertheless the expectation of life for 
radiologists, as observed in the U.S.A., is about five years less than 
that for others, and the incidence of leukemia in this group may be as 
high as ten times that in the whole population.
Death from irradiation may occur from several immediate causes, 
according to the dose received. Huge doses of many thousands of roentgen 
cause death from brain damage within a few hours. Death from an LD100 is 
usually due to destruction of the intestines and occurs in about 7-10 
days. Smaller doses such as an LD50 may produce the same effect, or the 
victim may die from failure of blood manufacture in 4-6 weeks or so. If 
this period is survived recovery normally occurs, though the chronic 
risks remain, even with very small doses. Thus a number of victims can 
be expected to die after years from, for example, leukemia.
The general pattern of radiation disease from a rapid exposure is as 
follows:—The primary symptoms . . . nausea, diarrhea and particularly 
vomiting appear in 2-24 hours, and may last 2-14 days or so. Secondary 
symptoms . . . fever, bleeding under the skin and from orifices, loss of 
hair and more diarrhea appear after an interval of some few days up to 
several weeks. The earlier the onset of symptoms of either type, and the 
longer they last, the worse is the outlook for the patient, and an 
indication is thereby given of the dose received. Loss of hair and 
bleeding in the first week are the gravest signs; death is certain.
Most of the available data regarding the biological effects of radiation 
has been derived from observations made in Japan, during, and since 1945 
supplemented by a growing body of evidence from animal experiments. 
Owing to the obvious impossibility of direct research on human beings, 
however, the picture is still far from complete.
Long Term View
The long term effects in survivors of the bombing in Japan, as observed 
by an international group of physicians in 1955, give food for thought, 
and will be detailed briefly here.
The most serious matter in the opinion of the writer is the persistence 
of vague ill health, tiredness, increased susceptibility to infections 
and other common disorders, and mental fear or apathy. By the word 
persistence a term of years is meant. Evidence has been adduced 
indicating that physical and mental retardation of growth occurred in 
children who survived the bombings. This, on the larger scale of global 
war, could only have the most serious consequences for the human race.
Leukemia and other blood disorders, most of them invariably fatal, are 
still appearing in survivors at a considerably higher rate than in 
unexposed populations, though the peak year was 1950. Cataracts are also 
relatively more common; these, incidentally, are thought to be due 
possibly to neutron irradiation in particular; further, their 
distribution has suggested that the range of neutrons may be much 
greater than is commonly accepted.
Many male survivors have become sterile as a result of exposure to 
radiation and an additional rather alarming figure is the increase in 
major congenital malformations among the children of those people who 
retained fertility. An increase by 72% on the rate common in unexposed 
populations was found. That is to say, there have been nearly twice as 
many abnormalities in the children of these survivors as one would find 
among an average group.
The above observations refer, of course, to people who received a single 
large dose. What of the effects of small repeated doses spread over many 
years?
Some investigations carried out recently in the U.S.A. on a number of 
radiologists revealed some interesting facts:
The average life span of this particular group of doctors was five years 
less than that of other doctors, and of the general population (60 years 
compared with 65 years).
The incidence of fatal leukemias was eight or nine times higher than 
that in nonradiologist doctors.
The average number of children born to members of the group was about 
half that found with other physicians (1.7 compared with 3).
Finally, there were 24% (one quarter) more congenital abnormalities 
among children of radiologists than among those of other doctors.
The group considered must have received, due to occupational hazard, 
perhaps as much as 1000 r over a whole lifetime in some cases, though in 
others probably very much less. This is a large amount compared with 
what an average individual receives. The figures nevertheless illustrate 
clearly the menace of chronic irradiation.
Every person during his or her life is continually bombarded with 
radiation in small quantities. Radioactive substances are everywhere 
present, though in minute amounts and cosmic rays from outer space 
contribute to the total "background" radiation. This normally amounts to 
about 1.5 r in every 10 years, 9-10 r during a whole lifetime. In 
addition, diagnostic X-ray procedures give a certain dose to the 
subject. The average total receipt from this source is very difficult to 
estimate, but may be, for the reproductive tissues (gonads) 
specifically, about 3 r in 30 years.
The effect of chronic irradiation seems to be similar to the process of 
ageing, to the extent that each roentgen is thought to shorten life by 
about a ten-thousandth. This in an average human being would only amount 
to a total of a few weeks due to background dosage. The general debility 
and increased liability to infections, already referred to, while less 
dramatic, present a far more serious prospect in terms of world health 
and working capacity.
Genetic Effects
Nuclear radiation does not produce monstrosities in babies just like 
that. This all too common idea is mere superstition.
The reproductive tissues of all living organisms produce naturally a 
certain number of "mutations"; that is, hereditary patterns in sperm or 
egg cells which differ to a greater or lesser extent from the normal for 
that species. Most of these result in infertility of the cell concerned, 
and they therefore never actually appear in offspring. Nearly all the 
remainder produce deleterious abnormalities. (Beneficial changes are 
rare.) All that irradiation does to the gonads in doses insufficient to 
kill the cells, is to increase the rate of production of mutations. A 
total amount of about 50 r received by an individual during his or her 
reproductive lifetime would double the total number of mutations 
produced during this period. Most of the changes, while deleterious, are 
also "recessive." In other words, they may not appear in one or several 
generations but will eventually.
However, to take a very possible example, it is suggested that a total 
dose of I Or (in addition to "background") to every person in the U.S.A. 
might well cause the actual appearance of 50,000 cases of inherited 
defect, over and above the present "normal" number (2%) in children of 
the first generation born thereafter. Continuing this rate of dosage to 
succeeding generations, the figure would increase, ultimately reaching a 
steady half-million per generation. Such a situation would pose a 
considerable social problem. A universal dose (U.S.A.) of only I r could 
produce several thousand cases of definite, if not obvious, handicap in 
the first generation. These figures, if expanded to cover the whole 
population of this planet, evidence the danger to which mankind is now 
exposing itself.
The situation cannot obviously be assessed fully at the present time. 
There may be a considerable error, one way or the other, with estimated 
figures, but the danger must not be ignored merely on this account.
How much is man-made radioactivity actually contributing at the present 
time to the total receipts of radiation by humans at large? Taking 
external radiation only, due to "fallout," wastes from atomic plants, 
etc., the probable amount is less than half a roentgen in 30 years to 
any individual. If weapon testing were to continue at a higher rate, 
equal to the maximum recorded so far for any one year, perhaps double 
this figure might be close to the truth.
This does not sound very much, and by itself is not. But taking into 
account increasing use of medical X-rays, and the very uncertain factor 
of internal radiation, the outlook is not quite optimistic. As already 
mentioned, a human being living in a western country receives about 3 r 
to the gonads from medical X-ray procedures on the average. Some 
individuals, of course, receive much more. A routine abdominal X-ray 
involves a total dose of I r per exposure, of which a proportion reaches 
the gonads. More prolonged investigations may deliver doses of 10-20 r. 
Since every least amount of radiation received produces more mutations, 
there is good reason to be concerned that exposure from all sources 
should be kept down to the barest minimum.
Internal Radioactivity
The danger of actually taking into the body radioactive substances has 
been referred to. It is illustrated by the fact, observed before 
radioactivity was discovered, that of uranium miners at Joachimsthal in 
Bohemia, more than 50% died of cancer of the lung. This was later found 
to be due to the continuous inhalation of a radioactive gas and 
radioactive dust.
Most of the products of an atomic explosion decay very rapidly, so that 
only the longer lived ones can contaminate more remote parts of the 
world. No such dramatic effects as that in the miners are to be 
expected. The most important substance appears to be an element called 
radiostrontium (strontium 90).
It loses half its activity in twenty years, and being chemically similar 
to calcium, tends to accumulate in bone, once absorbed. Furthermore, it 
is very difficult to remove once fixed in bone. Its presence can be a 
direct cause of cancer of the bone, and blood diseases, such as 
leukemia, can result from its action on bone marrow. In this situation, 
since the radiation source is so close to the living cells, the gamma 
and beta ray activity becomes important. Strontium 90 produces in 
particular beta and gamma rays.
It has been put forward that the quantity of radiostrontium in human 
bones at the present time is about 1:10,000th of the "maximum 
permissible amount." This does not allow, however, for several important 
factors. Firstly, atomic weapon tests are continuing; secondly, 
subsidence of dust from the upper atmosphere continues for long after a 
test. The effect is therefore delayed. These two items may well reduce 
the apparent safety margin, in the figure given, by 10-20 times. Next, 
the rate of uptake in children, particularly those younger than four 
years, is three times greater than the average. Children are also more 
sensitive to radiation than adults (a characteristic of growing 
tissues). Furthermore, the value for "the maximum permissible amount" 
taken in the above estimate is actually that permitted for persons 
occupationally in contact with radiations. The figure for the whole 
population should probably be at least ten times less.
These considerations practically annul the safety margin. Other 
substances known as carbon 14 and iodine 131, also unfissioned 
plutonium, appear too in appreciable amounts. When all these are taken 
into account, the situation appears indeed serious. The reader is now 
referred again to the final paragraphs of Chapter One.
Glossary
Aberration, a departure from rational thought or behavior. From the 
Latin, aberrare, to wander from; Latin, ab, away, errare, to wander. It 
means basically to err, to make mistakes, or more specifically to have 
fixed ideas which are not true. The word is also used in its scientific 
sense. It means departure from a straight line. If a line should go from 
A to B, then if it is "aberrated" it would go from A to some other 
point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to 
some other point and finally arrive at B. Taken in its scientific sense, 
it would also mean the lack of straightness or to see crookedly as, in 
example, a man sees a horse but thinks he sees an elephant. Aberrated 
conduct would be wrong conduct, or conduct not supported by reason.
AOSH DK, Advanced Organization-Saint Hill, Denmark. A Scientology 
organization in Denmark which delivers advanced courses in Scientology.
Auditing, same as processing.
Auditor, Scientology processing is done on the principle of making an 
individual look at his own existence, and improve his ability to 
confront what he is and where he is. An auditor is the person trained in 
the technology and whose job it is to ask the person to look, and get 
him to do so. The word auditor is used because it means one who listens, 
and a Scientology auditor does listen.
Close Terminals, the greatest ability of thought is DIFFERENTIATION. So 
long as one can differentiate, one is sane. Its opposite is 
IDENTIFICATION. When one begins to identify, one has "closed terminals" 
too closely, and believes one terminal is another terminal.
Dianetics, a system of coordinated axioms which resolve problems 
concerning human behavior and psychosomatic illnesses.
E-Meter, Hubbard Electrometer. An electronic instrument for measuring 
mental state and change of state in individuals, as an aid to precision 
and speed in auditing. The E-Meter is not intended or effective for the 
diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease.
Genetic Blueprint, the plans of construction of a new body in the 
orthodox manner of conception, birth and growth.
Grant Beingness, the ability to assume or grant (give, allow) beingness 
is probably the highest of human virtues. It is even more important to 
be able to permit (allow) other people to have beingness than to be able 
oneself to assume it.
Group Auditing, the application of certain Scientology processes to a 
group of people by a trained practitioner.
No-Game Condition, life is a game. A game consists of freedom, barriers 
and purposes. This is a scientific fact, not merely an observation. 
Freedom exists amongst barriers. A totality of barriers and a totality 
of freedom alike are no-game conditions. Each is similarly cruel. Each 
is similarly purposeless.
Postulate, a self-created truth would be simply the consideration 
generated by self. Well, we just borrow the word which is in seldom use 
in the English language, we call that postulate. And we mean by 
postulate, self-created truth. He posts something. He puts something up 
and that's what a postulate is.
Processes, Scientology is employed by an auditor (a Scientology 
practitioner) upon individuals or small or large groups of people, in 
their presence. The auditor makes these people, at their choice, do 
various exercises, and these exercises (processes) bring about changes 
for the better in intelligence, behavior and general competence.
Processing, the principle of making an individual look at his own 
existence, and improve his ability to confront what he is and where he is.
Restimulation, the reactivation of a past memory due to similar 
circumstances in the present approximating circumstances of the past.
Run Out, erase.
Scientology, the term SCIENTOLOGY is taken from scio (knowing in the 
fullest meaning of the word) and ology (to study). It is an applied 
religious philosophy dealing with the study of knowledge, which through 
the application of its technology, can bring about desirable changes in 
the conditions of life. Scientology, used by the trained and relatively 
untrained person, improves the intelligence, ability, behavior, skill 
and appearance of people.
tratto dal libro digitale gratuito:
ALL ABOUT RADIATION  by A NUCLEAR PHYSICIST and A MEDICAL DOCTOR

 ALL ABOUT RADIATION  by A NUCLEAR PHYSICIST and A MEDICAL DOCTOR
Certo, certo:
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/detoxbookpt2.htm

 
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/detoxbookpt2.htm
C''é da aver paura!
-- 
Nihil sine magno labore vita dedit mortalibus
Salvatore
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it


Visto che alla fuffara svizzera piacciono tanto le dotte citazioni da 
Wikipedia, cerchiamo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianazene
Io non sono un medico ma,  non credo proprio che vit.C, vitamine assortite 
del complesso B, calcio e ferro possano fare alcunchè riguardo alle 
radiazioni
C'è il link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_About_Radiation
All about radiation è la "bibbia Scementologista sulle radiazioni".
Cerchiamo una stroncatura...
Rapporto Anderson
La relazione Anderson
I risultati finali della Relazione Anderson nel 1965 ha dichiarato:
"Il consiglio ha sentito prove da un radiologo altamente qualificato  che ha 
fatto uno studio speciale delle radiazioni ed i suoi effetti. Egli ha 
affermato che la conoscenza di Hubbard  sulle radiazioni, come mostrato dai 
suoi scritti in "All abot radiation" (tutto sulle radiazioni, ndr) è stata 
la 'forma di conoscenza che, forse, un ragazzo potrebbe avere della Fisica, 
con un sacco di incomprensioni e la mancanza di conoscenza'.... Da questa 
testimonianza è la prova evidente che Hubbard è completamente incompetente a 
trattare il tema delle radiazioni e che la sua conoscenza della fisica 
nucleare è distorta, imprecisa, sbagliata e trascurabile. Non ci sono prove 
che contestino in ogni modo queste conclusioni.
Consiglio: torna a postare su it.religioni e,  non rompere su it.salute
Ne ho piene le scatole della fuffara neo-nazista svizzera, di Scementology, 
Tom Cruise e di Hubbard.
E'troppo semplice stroncare Hubbard
Geh' zum Teufi, Weiba! Vai al Diavolo
Alessio

 Alessio
Non ho ancora capito la relazione o solo la competenza tra Kevin Victor 
Anderson e la radioattività  è un giudice nucleare 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Victor_Anderson
 , e il tutto 
pubblicato su di un sito web di un razzista come Dave Touretzky con 
l'istruzione come costriuire una bomba 
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/
Telegiornale di Channel 11 americano
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR_DoZu2ke4
Al prossimo tschernobyl nel raggio di 1000 kilometri tu prenderai la 
bruciacchiata del tipo solare e io saro li vicino indenne a guardare....
Dave Touretzky figura come razzista citato presso 
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/
Ma il bello è che la medicina del tuo padrone non dispone neanche di 
rimedio a cura o a precauzione delle esposizioni.
Inoltre io ho dato la ricetta originale del Dianazene e come si fa, se 
tu vuoi credere ai razzisti fai pure.
Se la gente crede alla chemio e poi muore, quella è una strada battuta 
dal tuo padrone, e non da saggezza o sapere.
L'effetto iatrogeneo della chemio come la cura il tuo padrone, semmai...
Le prove scientifiche della chemio sono state perse per strada...

>> natura vi ha messo un muro di berlino per le radiazioni.
Ti faccio una proposta.
 In laboratorio abbiamo uno scanner per il cemento armato.
Si usa come gli apparecchi a raggi x, in stanza schermata, iscrizione allo 
specifico albo del responsabile, etc , etc, etc,
Io ti do un dosimetro per radiazioni e tu ti imbottisci delle tue vitamine.
Poi ti chiudi nella stanza , con lo  scanner acceso, fino a quando il 
dosimetro e' nero?
Ti lascio la porta solo accostata, puoi uscire quando vuoi, ma se credi alle
tue vitamine non dovresti temere i raggi gamma...
Io scommetto una casa in centro citta' che esci prima che il dosimetro sia 
solo colorato appena appena ,
tu che ne dici?
 La firmi la liberatoria prima di entrare?
Lo sai come si muore per radiazioni? Male, si cade a pezzi, come i lebbrosi, 
solo che loro non sentono alcun dolore....
E se uno solo delle centinaia di militari che si sono suicidati per 
seppellire Cernobil sotto polvere di piombo e cemento, avesse
solo immaginato che forse una possibilita con quella roba l'avrebbe avuta , 
non si sarebbe riempito con l'imbuto di diazene ????
( dia  netica ovunque, ma avete Goebbels tra i vostri????)
Se solo fosse stato appena plausibile che la tua ipotesi corrispondesse alla 
realta' dei fatti,
perche' non avete proposto una collaborazione con gli addetti al 
seppellimento del reattore?
Oppure vi siete dimenticati del fatto, sai non e' una cosa che si nota...non 
rammento la vostra partecipazione ai lavori...
Raffaele

 Le prove scientifiche della chemio sono state perse per strada...
Prove scientifiche della chemio? Ma non eri tu quello che "le prove 
non servono"?

 specifico albo del responsabile, etc , etc, etc,
Non sai leggere qui si parla di scorie radioattive! non di raggi X.
Prendi la ricetta originale di Dianazene che ho postato in inglese....
altre soluzioni la medicina non li fornisce, la scienza ufficiale sono 
indietro di 60 anni....
A un mammifero dai per 10 giorni il Dianazene nell'acqua da renderlo 
imune fino a 60  giorni  poi  fai un buco nel cemento di tschernobyl e 
lo lasci passeggiare....  per 1 giorno.
Tu senza Dianazene avrai come delle bruciature solari da far staccare la 
pelle e farti venire il cancro, e la bestiolina farà la sua vita normale....
Ma sai leggere inglese, la ricetta intendo?

 Non sai leggere qui si parla di scorie radioattive! non di raggi X.
...Il


 passeggiare....  per 1 giorno.
Non ci penso nemmeno! Vuoi sacrificare un topo da laboratorio per questo 
esperimento demenziale???
Hubbard si autodefiniva un fisico nucleare: in realtà, se leggi All about 
radiaton con occhi non da boccalona svizzera, ti fai grasse risate! E' pieno 
di scempiaggini. Io non sono un dottore ma, ho studiato fisica e chimica e. 
non ho mai letto un cumulo di fesserie simile.Fisico nucleare? 
Mapperfavore...
Il dianazene tientelo!
Bye,Alessio

 lo lasci passeggiare....  per 1 giorno.
Vacci tu idiota, potresti vincere il premio Darwin 2009!

 Ma sai leggere inglese, la ricetta intendo?
Io si, e le mie conoscenze di medicina ,
contraddicono TUTTO quello che sta scritto li dentro
Lo sai che anche le vitamine possono essere nocive , a quelle dosi?
Tu sai leggere l'italiano?
Raffaele


wrote:

ROTFL!
Anche una buona candidatura per il premio IG nobel la vedrei bene....
___________________________________________________________________
La fine del giorno č vicina quando uomini bassi fanno ombre lunghe.