Newsgroup: it.scienza.astronomia.seti
Titolo: M,I-5,Perse cution ' wh y the  secur ity servic es?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
You may ask, why do I think the "they" referred to are the. security
services?. Is there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many. people? Even if there
is a single source,. is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people. working for a privately
funded. organization?
a) As. to the question of a single source versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there is. a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried. out. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home, there. must be one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during travel). people have
been planted in close proximity. and rehearsed in what they were to say, it
follows that someone must have done the planning for that, and again. a
single source. is indicated.
b) So. why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
organisation, for example a private. detective agency paid to manage the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective. agencies are
unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in. the past when they've
been exposed or caught; they too can have access to. the bugging technology
deployed; and there are reported cases of. MI5 paying private eyes to do
their dirty work (against. peace campaigners and similar enemies of the
state). on the understanding that if they were caught then they could deny
all knowledge. Why couldn't that be. the case?
The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement. (as opposed
to amateurs. or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media in
particular, and the fact that the television companies are. so involved in
the campaign. The BBC would not. directly invade someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within their. remit to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do so. An. organisation of their stature would not take part in
a campaign set up by private sources. The only. people they would take
material from would be. the security services, presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling. it would be MI5 who would
take the. consequences.
State. sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is also
indicated by duration;. support for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means and will of most. private sources.
The viciousness. of the slanders and personal denigration also points to
MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state. from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and. in this case are using their
tried and tested methods to murder with. words an enemy they have invented
for. themselves.
And there are precedents. Diana. and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
"at it" by. an Army intelligence team which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who had. been
on the team. His statements were denied by the. defence establishment who
tried to character-assassinate by describing him as. the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you. tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn't it? Thought
only communists behaved. like that?
Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by someone in the. army who
revealed the existence of videotapes. of him and Diana, and that the tapes
would be published if any attempt. was made by them to resume their
association.
1665

of life, have passions which
presuppose at least a sensitive soul to feel them, nay more, that the object
of their dread is the void? What is there in the void that could make them
afraid? Nothing is more shallow and ridiculous. This is not all; it is said
that they have in themselves a source of movement to shun the void. Have
they arms, legs, muscles, nerves?
76. To write against those who made too profound a study of science:
Descartes.
77. I cannot forgive Descartes. In all his philosophy he would have been
quite willing to dispense with God. But he had to make Him give a fillip to
set the world in motion; beyond this, he has no further need of God.
78. Descartes useless and uncertain.
79. Descartes.--We must say summarily: "This is made by figure and motion,"
for it is true. But to say what these are, and to compose the machine, is
ridiculous. For it is useless, uncertain, and painful. And were it true, we
do not think all Philosophy is worth one hour of pain.
80. How comes it that a cripple does not offend us, but that a fool does?
Because a cripple recognises that we walk straight, whereas a fool declares
that it is we who are silly; i

his brethren for twenty
pieces of silver, and thereby becoming their lord, their saviour, the
saviour of strangers and the saviour of the world; which had not been but
for their plot to destroy him, their sale and their rejection of him.
In prison, Joseph innocent between two criminals; Jesus Christ on the cross
between two thieves. Joseph foretells freedom to the one, and death to the
other, from the same omens. Jesus Christ saves the elect, and condemns the
outcast for the same sins. Joseph foretells only; Jesus Christ acts. Joseph
asks him who will be saved to remember him, when he comes into his glory;
and he whom Jesus Christ saves asks that He will remember him, when He comes
into His kingdom.
769. The conversion of the heathen was only reserved for the grace of the
Messiah. The Jews have been so long in opposition to them without success;
all that Solomon and the prophets said has been useless. Sages, like Plato
and Socrates, have not been able to persuade them.
770. After many persons had gone before, Jesus Christ at last came to say:
"Here am I, and this is the time. That which the prophets have said was to
come in the fullness of time, I tell you my apostles will do. The Jews shall
be cast out. Jerusalem shall be soon destroyed. And the heathen 

me tangere.[99] We must unite ourselves only to
His sufferings.
At the Last Supper He gave Himself in communion as about to die; to the
disciples at Emmaus as risen from the dead; to the whole Church as ascended
into heaven.
555. "Compare not thyself with others, but with Me. If thou dost not find Me
in those with whom thou comparest thyself, thou comparest thyself to one who
is abominable. If thou findest Me in them, compare thyself to Me. But whom
wilt thou compare? Thyself, or Me in thee? If it is thyself, it is one who
is abominable. If it is I, thou comparest Me to Myself. Now I am God in all.
"I speak to thee, and often counsel thee, because thy director cannot speak
to thee, for I do not want thee to lack a guide.
"And perhaps I do so at his prayers, and thus he leads thee without thy
seeing it. Thou wouldst not seek Me, if thou didst not possess Me.
"Be not therefore troubled."
          SECTION VIII: THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION
556.... Men blaspheme what they do not know. The Christian religion consists
in two points. It is of equal concern to men to know them, and it is equally
dangerous to be ignorant of them. And it is equally of God's mercy that He
has given indications of both.
And yet they take occasion to conclude that one of these points does not
exist, from that which should have caused them to infer the other. The sages
who have said there is only one God have been persecuted, the Jews were
hated, and still more the Christians. They have seen by the light of nature
that if there be a true religion on earth, the course of all things must
tend to it as to a centre.
The whole course of things must have for its object the