Newsgroup: it.discussioni.ingegneria
Titolo: Superiorita' tecnologica e panzane varie: leggetevi queste

Il nuovo DSP della Texas Instruments completamente progettato a 
Bangalore (India) !!!!
http://www.rediff.com/computer/1998/mar/31ankoor.htm
Sto cercando conferma e appena trovo qualcosa ve lo posto ma pure il 
nuovo Celeron verra' fuori dal design center di Bangalore dell'Intel.
Com'era quella? Ah si, non sono al nostor livello, fanno bassa 
manovalanza .... si si , come no .... :-))
-- 
What the eyes see and the ears hear, the mind believes.

Se non l'avete notato e' un articolo del 1998 ;-))


 manovalanza .... si si , come no .... :-))
Tanto per ridimensionare le tue catastrofiche affermazioni.
http://www.amd.com/it-it/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543_10218~79176,00.html

Ah dimenticavo....
L'investimento è dello scorso novembre.
ROTLF!!!!!!!!!!!!

 ROTLF!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Arrivi tardi amico.
http://tinyurl.com/6nop2
Continua a ridere. 


gne...@nospamhotmail.com
 says...
Altro calabraghe col nick "embedded".
Chissa perche' sti fenomeni non saltano fuori con Apache e company, 
anzi, sono mesi ormai che intasa il gruppo quel pirla e trova sempre 
piu' pirla che continuano a rispondergli.


 Bangalore (India) !!!!
La maggior trasformazione attuale, figlia della globalizzazione e del
miglioramento delle comunicazioni, è la delocalizzazione intellettuale, non
solo dei costi di produzione.
Quelli che insistono a parlare di "produzioni di qualità" come
caratteristica europea stanno solo cercando di proseguire
nell'autoillusione.
Ciao.
M.

 ha scritto nel messaggio
news:MPG.1b6c1683b...@news.tin.it...


 vero costo è la ricerca e l'investimento produttivo.
Scusa, ma sai leggere? E' stato PROGETTATO a Bangalore. Costo della 
manodopera? Stiamo parlando di R&D. Non incide sui costi? E per quale 
ragione non lo progettano piu' in America? 


 manovalanza .... si si , come no .... :-))
Invece di farvi pippe mentali sollevando la questione ogni volta, cercate di
fornire
delle possibili soluzioni al problema.

 delle possibili soluzioni al problema.
 
Illuminaci.


 ragione non lo progettano piu' in America?
Non saprei dirti, forse perchč, come accadde in passato per l'Italia, i
cervelli buoni sono scappati all'estero dove esiste ancora una cultura
dell'investire sul sapere e sulla scuola! Ed ora pure l'America tocca la
stessa sorte.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=108-05052004
WASHINGTON, May 5 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The number of employed U.S. 
electrical and electronics engineers (EEs) continues to decline, 
according to first-quarter data compiled by the Department of Labor's 
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
BLS reported 327,000 employed EEs in the first quarter of 2004 vs. 
386,000 in the second quarter last year, a decline of 59,000 employed 
EEs from the 2003 quarter with the highest employment. EE employment was 
349,000 in last year's fourth quarter, a decline of 22,000.
The EE unemployment rate increased from 4.5 percent in the final quarter 
of 2003 to 5.3 percent in the first quarter of 2004, an increase of 17.8 
percent. The average for 2003 was a record 6.2 percent, compared to the 
more typical 1.3 in 2000 and 2.0 in 2001.
The joblessness rate for computer scientists and systems analysts, which 
averaged a record 5.2 percent last year, went from 5.4 percent in the 
fourth quarter to an all-time high of 6.7 in the first quarter, a 24.1 
percent rise. The number of people employed in the field averaged 
722,000 in 2003; the first-quarter figure was down to 672,000.
"The latest statistics indicate that times are still tough for 
engineers," IEEE-USA President John Steadman said. "The continued 
shrinkage of the electrical and electronics engineering workforce should 
send up warning flags that the United States may be losing ground in its 
technological competitiveness."
The news was mixed in other computer and information technology fields. 
The quarterly unemployment rate for computer hardware engineers fell 
from 9.0 percent in the fourth quarter to 4.9 in the first quarter. 
Computer software engineers experienced a drop from 4.5 percent to 3.3. 
The unemployment rate for computer programmers, however, nearly doubled 
from 4.6 percent to 9.0.
IEEE-USA is an organizational unit of the IEEE. It was created in 1973 
to advance the public good and promote the careers and public-policy 
interests of the more than 225,000 technology professionals who are U.S. 
members of the IEEE. The IEEE is the world's largest technical 
professional society. For more information, go to 
http://www.ieeeusa.org
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ieeeusa.org/releases/2004/022604pr.html
Unemployment Rate for Electrical Engineers and Computer Scientists 
Reaches All-Time High in 2003
WASHINGTON (26 February 2004) — The unemployment rate for U.S. 
electrical and electronics engineers (EEs) averaged a record 6.2 percent 
in 2003, a 47.6 percent increase over the previous year (4.2), according 
to data compiled by the Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics 
(BLS). The previous high of 4.3 percent was set in 1994.
The 2003 rate is more than three times the level in 2001 (2.0 percent) 
and over four times the figure for 2000 (1.3). The average 2003 
unemployment rate for all workers was 5.6 percent.
While recent EE unemployment has risen, the number of employed EEs has 
fallen. BLS reported 386,000 employed EEs in the second quarter last 
year vs. 349,000 in the fourth quarter, a decline of 37,000.
"The continuing high levels of engineering unemployment are not 
surprising considering the trend toward outsourcing of high-tech jobs 
overseas," IEEE-USA President John Steadman said. "This offshoring of 
high-paying jobs may look good on the bottom line of a quarterly 
financial report, but it's certainly not good for the skilled technical 
professional who can't find a job."
The 2003 jobless rate for computer scientists and systems analysts 
reached an all-time high of 5.2 percent, an increase of .2 percentage 
points over 2002 and four times as high as 1998's 1.3 percent. The rate 
also jumped .6 percent from the third to fourth quarters of 2003 to 
stand at 5.4 percent.
The quarterly EE jobless rate fell from 6.7 percent to 4.5 percent in 
the final quarter. The number of employed EEs, however, remained steady 
at 349,000. The discrepancy could be explained by discouraged EEs no 
longer counting as officially unemployed because they either found work 
in another field, or just stopped looking. BLS reports that the number 
of unemployed EEs dropped from 25,000 to 16,000 from the third to fourth 
quarters.
The quarterly unemployment rate for computer hardware engineers jumped 
dramatically from 6.9 to 9.0 percent, and averaged 7.0 for 2003. 
Computer software engineers saw their jobless rate fall slightly from 
4.6 to 4.5 percent (5.2 for 2003); and computer programmers experienced 
a drop from 7.1 to 4.6 percent (6.4 for the year). The rate for 
aerospace engineers rose a percentage point to 5.0 percent, and finished 
at 4.8 percent for the year.
Comparisons to previous years are difficult because BLS revamped its 
occupational classifications and reporting conventions after 2002.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ecmweb.com/market/electric_electrical_engineers_face/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/03/1104/art1.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS: Da notare che soprattutto il numero di ingegneri occupati cala molto 
piu' rapidamente dell'aumento del tasso di disoccupazione, perche' molti 
hanno cambiato carriera e non cercano piu'.


 stessa sorte.
Stai scherzando vero?
