Newsgroup: it.hobby.radioamatori
Titolo: WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

 wtc2 = cascadeTime 417 110 77

There are so many basic physics mistakes in here it's laughable.  Aside from
the fact that the underlying premise is laughable, of course.

No it's true, an under cover government  Ninja demolition squad went in the 
eve of 9/11 and did several months worth of demolition prep work removing 
tons of material surrounding the support structure, placed thousands of 
dynamite charges and cleaned up the mess before morning.  Much like how 
Santa Claus delivers all those presents in one night.
SotR 

The WTC towers were brought down by crazed terrorists, but a side
effect of it all was the jump-starting of the Global Brain.


This doesn't prove that the building was "wired for demolition". But
it certainly creates the possibility.
quasi

"quasi" <qu...@null.set> wrote in message
news:ig3dj3l3psvob2a2v...@4ax.com...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor
"All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the right one."

"pancake collapse" and all other putative muzlim fiziks is immaterial;
everyone saw the massive impact & explosion,
unlike any prior trashfire in a tall building, or
the say-so of the contractor that it could withstand several such
attacks.
look; the plane was almost as wide as the building.
unfirtunately, there was virtually no asbestos cladding
on the main beams, because of teh asbestos hoax being launched,
just after the start of construction.  such refractant
might have kept the steel from getting weak enough to collapse
(it did not have to "melt," as stated
vy the MIT welder's analysis).
thus:
perhaps, the ordinary aircraft black box,
is just a 4-gimbalthingy plus a harddisk.
better ask Mr. Gimbal!
I know, it's not gimball, because of this talking typewriter.
--The Lyyn Cheeny Factor: 25 Hours til the campus jihad!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/071107impeach_momentum.html
http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing12/leidig_statement.pdf
(more circumstantial BS; sorry, but they didn't have a link
to the "rest of the story")

I reapeat: computerized simulacra of all parties are immaterial;
there is no "uncontrolled demilotion" of similar magnitude
with which to compare, and the comparison with actual demos is,
"orders of magnitude" with precision placement of **** (small globs
thereof).  thermate/thermite/thermote/thermute, your ***!
I'd have liked a link to the rest of the Congressional testimony
in the bottom URL, but nothing is more common in the military,
than delegation of one's authority -- it's a requirement,
called "training."
monsieur Griffin should go back & rate these anomalies,
in order of importance, if not of foolishness.


"quasi" <qu...@null.set> wrote in message 
news:ig3dj3l3psvob2a2v...@4ax.com...

For the WTC collapse and the Pentagon attack to have been the result of a US 
government conspiracy, how many people would have to be involved?  The sheer 
numbers would be staggering and the scope of involvement so deep and complex 
that it boggles the mind.  Run that past an odds maker...
As full of holes as the Bush administration is, it would be impossible for 
the details to have not been leaked.  Yet, all we have for an information 
base in the conspiracy department are a cadre of goofballs with fertile 
imaginations offering their own brand of pure B.S. and pseudoscience. 
Sheeesh.
Bless your heart,
Steve



Personally, I don't think it's a "US government" conspiracy.
But there's no question my mind question that it was a conspiracy. 
Moreover, it's seems likely that there was some prior knowledge by
certain individuals within the US government. Letting it happen was
simply a convenient way to justify an agenda (war with Iraq) that was
pre-planned.
The magnitude of the act may not have been known in advance, but once
it happened, it was put to full use.
And there's no question that there was a coverup.
The money trail was never investigated.
It leads to Germany, Saudi Arabia, an ultimately ties back to the Bush
family, or at least taints it.
For example, who funded the college scholarship for Mohammed Atta
through in Germany? The German investigators know, and made their
findings public. In fact, it was a right-wing American organization
which backed Bush, but even further right-wing than the Bush camp. The
mainstream American media won't touch this hot potato. 
What do you know about the real backgrounds of any of the 9/11
terrorists? For a crime of this magnitude, the public deserves to know
everything about them, right back to childhood, if necessary, but
especially who funded them, who their contacts were, who authorized
their entry into the US, etc.
As to who let them in, that's known. The problem is that it leads
directly to the American embassy in Saudi Arabia which, as has been
reliably reported by ex-officials of the embassy, routinely let the
CIA and US State Dept officials override the required background
checks normally required for issuing visas.
One thing is clear. Even if it wasn't a "US govenrnment" conspiracy,
it certainly was a US government coverup. There were too many
potential ties from the Saudi connection right back to Bush, Cheny,
Rove, Wolfowitz, and others. It had the potential to bring down the
government (i.e., get them all impeached, jailed, or at least forced
to resign).
quasi

 
  Oh yeah ?
  Which ones ?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
 The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----