Newsgroup: it.salute.aids
Titolo: hiv virus inventato???

 Ernesto
Hei disinformato con patente !
leggiti :
      HIV VIRUS INVENTATO
      "In Australia un gruppo di ricercatori del Royal Perth
Hospital,
definito "The Perth Group", ha concentrato le proprie ricerche
sull'isolamento dell'HIV e sulla validità dei test ELISA (test di
primo
livello, il più utilizzato), Western Blot (secondo livello,
considerato più
attendibile) e Viral Load (l'ultimo apparso); hanno concluso le loro
ricerche affermando che nessuno dei lavori pubblicati dimostra che
l'HIV sia
stato isolato e che i tre test non provano affatto la presenza del
virus HIV
nei campioni di sangue sottoposti a test. "
TEST "HIV" FRAUDOLENTO
            Caro Direttore, il Val  Turner ("The Ying and Yang of
HIV") ha
ragione nelle sue argomentazioni che non vi é prova scientifica che
esista l
'HIV.
      Ne consegue che tutte le procedure di test vanno bloccate.
      Di recente ho avviato il Gruppo per l'Analisi Scienti­fica dei
test
fraudoienti per l'HIV, onde poter aiutare le persone a fare scelte
informate
riguardanti la scienza disonesta alle spalle dei cosiddetti test per
gli
anticorpi del­l'HIV. Tutte le procedure putative per il test dell'HIV
(PCR/carico virale/genetica) sono non specifiche, non standardizzate e
non
riproducibili; diversi kit di test producono diversi risultati; e
paesi
diversi hanno criteri diversi su quanto costituisce un risultato
HIV-positivo.
      Vi sono 60 condizioni cono­sciute per produrre un risul­tato
HIV-positivo, comprese epatite, influenza e malattie immunitarie. I
test
'HIV' non rilevano, e non potranno mai farlo, l'HIV perché un simile
ipotetico retrovirus non é mai stato isolato.
      Il prof. Gordon Stewart et al. hanno scritto su Lancet (21
agosto
1999): "...perehé l'HIV non é mai stato isolato da microscopi
elettronici o
ultracentrifugazione gradien­te da materiale di co-cultura cellulare
proveniente da un qualsiasi paziente africano?" I O da qualsiasi altro
in
tutto il mondo? Il fatto é che le par­ticelle di 'HIV' non sono mai
state
viste, isolate o recuperate da sangue o plasma non da coltura.
      Il prof. Gordon Stewart ha anche sostenuto su Current Medical
Research
and Opi­nion (13[1O]:627-634, 1997):
      "Al momento non vi sono basi scientifiche per usare questi test
per
provare l'infe­zione da HIV." Alla Conferenza Mondiale sull'AIDS di
Ginevra
del 1998, alla sessione del primo giorno, "Test HIV: Domande Aperte
sulla
Specificità", venne affermato: "Il significato dei test HIV
attualmente
utilizzati é sconosciuto ed éurgentemente necessaria una
rivalutazione."
      Sino ad oggi Robert Gallo, il prof. Luc Montagnier, il dr. Jay
Levy,
il prof. Richard Tedder e il prof. Robin Weiss non hanno provato che
l'HIV
esista come un retrovirus isolato/purificato. Pertanto non éetico, é
fuorviante e irresponsabile promuovere un test 'HIV' fraudolento.
      Chiunque abbia bisogno di ulteriori informazioni può contattare
il
nostro gruppo al seguente indirizzo.
      Distinti saluti,
      Alex Russell, Vicedirettore, Continuurn Magazir.e; The Group
for
Scientific Analysis of Fraudulent HIV Testing,
      4A Hollybush Piace, Bethnai Green, E2 9QX, UK, tel +44 (0)171
6133909,
fax ±44 (0)171 6133312, e-mail conti­
n...@dircon.co.uk
      SULL'AIDS E' TUTTO DA RIFARE
      Intervista a Kary Mullis
      "A generarlo sono più fattori, di sicuro una vita molto
disordinata
mette a rischio il sistema immunitario"
      Ma la scienza non crede al Nobel Mussil
      MILANO. Kary Mullis, 53 anni, premio Nobel per la Chimica, da 10
anni
conduce una battaglia (quasi) solitaria sull'Aids. A differenza della
stragrande maggioranza degli scienziati non è affatto convinto che la
causa
dell'Aids sia il retrovirus Hiv. Dice, dal 1988, che "nessun
esperimento
scientifico lo ha mai provato". Dice che "le cause potrebbero essere
altre e
più complesse". Dice (infine) "che l'Aids è una epidemia meno diffusa
della
paura che ha generato".
      Kary Mullis (l'eretico) è venuto a Milano per l'annuale
incontro
"Dieci Nobel per il futuro" e (come al solito) ha scandalizzato la
platea
per le sue opinioni non ortodosse sulla ricerca scientifica in
generale e
sull'Aids in particolare. In questi dieci anni ha diretto i controlli,
per
la città di Los Angeles, su tutto il sangue donato alle strutture di
sanità
pubblica.
      Poi si è occupato di Dna scoprendo la Polymerase Chain Reaction
(reazione a catena della polimerase) che consente di "fotocopiare" il
Dna,
quindi di produrne una gran quantità anche da frazioni piccolissime.
La
scoperta gli ha fruttato il premio Nobel. Ascoltarlo produce un vago
senso
di allarme. Anche adesso: poltrone in velluto di grande albergo,
mentre beve
Campari, mangia noccioline, si stropiccia la faccia che ricorda quella
di
Jack Nicholson, si gratta la testa e parla.
      Quindi dottor Mullis, l'Aids è una invenzione? "No, non dico
affatto
questo. L'infezione e i morti sono reali, anche se assai più limitati
di
quanto si creda. Ma molte cose dette sull'Aids sono diventate vere a
forza
di ripeterle."
      A cominciare dalla concatenazione Hiv-Aids alla quale non crede.
"Qui
non si tratta di stabilire quello che io o lei o tutto il mondo
suppone,
desidera, crede. Non stiamo parlando di religione."
      Coma mai tra migliaia di scienziati lei è l'unico che...
"L'unico
proprio no... Ma che vuol dire poi? Anche Galileo era piuttosto solo,
all'inizio..."
      Perchè secondo lei la ricerca mondiale avrebbe accettato di
perseverare nell'errore? Cominciamo dall'inizio. "L'inizio sono i
miliardi
di finanziamento pubblico e privato per la ricerca... All'inizio degli
Anni
'80 il rubinetto stava andando a secco perchè il Congresso Americano
tirava
la cinghia. E centinaia di laboratori, istituzioni governative e
private,
giravano a rilento. Sto parlando dei massimi ambiti di ricerca degli
Stati
Uniti, non di piccole o medie case farmaceutiche... C'era bisogno di
una
epidemia e in un certo senso l'epidemia fu trovata."
      Sta scherzando? "Non sto affatto scherzando, so di cosa parlo.
Vede,
se lei va a Washington a dire che si occupa di una epidemia che
infesta i
corsi d'acqua africani, il Congresso due soldi te li dà pure, solo che
dopo
un pò ti dice: chissenefrega. Ma se vai da loro con una epidemia che
infesta
o infesterà le città di New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, insomma
la
vita urbana e poi quella rurale della sacra America, quelli salteranno
su
una sedia e ti apriranno tutte le casseforti."
      E' questo che è accaduto? "E' accaduto che l'Aids faceva i primi
morti
tra gli omosessuali e i tossicomani. E' accaduto che non se ne capiva
la
causa... Che la paranoia aumentava, che la ricerca procedeva sparsa
verso
tante ipotetiche cause. Ed è accaduto che un giorno il grande Robert
Gallo,
togliendosi i suoi occhiali da Blues Brothers davanti alle telecamere
d'America disse: io so qual'è la causa, si chiama Hiv."
      Lo disse anche Luc Montagnier del Pasteur di Parigi. "Più o meno
negli
stessi giorni di Bob Gallo. E i due si litigarono la scoperta sino a
che
Reagan e Mitterrand, dopo un incontro a Vienna, dissero loro di
piantarla e
di lavorare."
      Cosa che fecero. "Eccome. Sull'Aids sono stati investiti
qualcosa come
30 miliardi di dollari dal solo governo americano. Altrettanti dai
privati,
più quelli dei governi europei e delle grandi multinazionali. Una
montagna
di denaro."
      Tutto indirizzato sull'Hiv. "Che è solo uno dei miliardi di
retrovirus
che stanno tranquillamente nel nostro organismo. Da allora in poi e
per
sempre si stabilì che se c'era una certa quota di Hiv nel sangue, il
paziente era positivo al test e quindi aveva l'Aids. Poi magari moriva
di
polmonite, di tubercolosi, ma veniva classificato come Aids e quindi
vittima
di Hiv. A Los Angeles ogni unità sanitaria che segnala un nuovo caso
di Aids
riceve 2500 dollari di finanziamento federale."
      Mi dice da dove arriva l'Aids, secondo lei, e da cosa è
generato? "La
mia opinione è che ci siano moltissime cause a generarlo. Riguardano
l'insieme del sistema immunitario, e lo stile di vita a cui viene
sottoposto
l'organismo. C'è stata una parte della generazione adulta negli Anni
'60 e
'70, americani bianchi e neri, non solo omosessuali, ma di grande
promiscuità sessuale, che per la prima volta ha praticato una vita
molto
disordinata per periodi davvero lunghi."
      In che senso disordinata? "Significa bere molto alcol, dormire
pochissimo, usare droghe, eroina, coca, o le sintetiche, da quelle
per
rilassarsi, alle anfetamine per stare svegli, mangiare male,
ammalarsi
spesso, usare continuamente antibiotici. E avere, come hanno rilevato
le
prime inchieste sulla popolazione colpita, da 100 a 300 rapporti
sessuali in
un anno, con partner sempre differenti."
      Sta parlando, più o meno, di giovani alternativi, dropout,
gay...
"Guardi che non non c'è nessun giudizio moralistico, io sono
lontanissimo da
queste cose... Dico che mai prima di allora moltissimi organismi si
sono
esposti a questo bombardamento quotidiano... Il sistema immunitario
funziona
come un cammello nel deserto quando è sovraccarico: regge, va avanti,
poi
crolla di colpo."
      Ma non si disse che il virus era nato in Africa? "Questa è
un'altra
leggenda... In Africa non c'è un solo dato scientifico che lo provi.
In
Occidente, in presenza di Hiv nel sangue, vengono definite Aids 29
differenti patologie. In Africa ne bastano tre: perdita di peso,
diarrea, e
sfinimento. Se ricorda si disse che in Africa sarebbero scomparse una
o
forse due intere generazioni. Non è accaduto. Si disse che il 70 per
cento
delle prostitute senegalesi sarebbero morte nei successivi 5 anni: ne
sono
passati 10 e gran parte di loro sta benissimo."
      Scusi, ma allora tutte le campagne sull'uso del preservativo...
"E'
una questione interessante. Come è noto l'Aids non è progredito ai
livelli
esponenziali che ci avevano pronosticato. La sua diffusione è molto
diminuita. Ci dicono che questo è accaduto grazie alla prevenzione e
all'uso
diffuso del preservativo. Benissimo. Ma allora come mai tutte le
infezioni
veneree continuano a crescere? La verità è che in America si usa il
preservativo più o meno come prima e probabilmente meno."
      Se ha ragione, perchè sarebbe stato "inventato" l'Hiv? "Perchè
era un
modo semplice di risolvere un problema complesso. Perché metteva
tutti
d'accordo: il fondamentalismo religioso e il puritanesimo. La lobby
della
ricerca e la voracità dei media. Era tutto spettacolare: molti soldi e
molta
gloria e molta autopunizione per tutti. Se ricorda non si è parlato
d'altro
per anni. Come si fece per il Vietnam..."
      In che senso? "Che anche quella guerra, come questa, fu fatta
per
tante ragioni, comprese alcune molto stupide. E su un'ipotesi
probabilmente
sbagliata. Come da 15 anni sull'Aids."
      Pino Corrias
      (da "La Stampa", 07 dicembre 1998)
      Ecco le semplici modalità per star bene:
      La Medicina Biologica o Naturale è la Scienza che procede
indagando
sulle Vere cause che provocano le malattie, cercando di risolverle
nel
miglior ed unico modo possibile e cioè, rimuovendo tutte le cause
ri-trovate, senza ricorrere ad interventi cruenti o nocivi per gli
stati
fisiologici e psichici generali, (che invece sono sempre presenti
negli
"effetti collaterali" utilizzando i farmaci allopatici moderni),
seguendo
procedure che siano in sintonia con le "Leggi Cosmiche" dalle quali
tutti i
complessi biologici dipendono.
      Si tratta dell'applicazione, attraverso l'Educazione alla
Salute, di
procedimenti fisici, psicologici, l'impiego di sostanze naturali ed
atossiche, atte a ripristinare le "alterazioni" Psicofisiche e le
intossicazioni intervenute nello stato di malattia, in modo da
recuperare la
Perfetta Salute, in quanto questa è un patrimonio ed un diritto
acquisito
dalla nascita, da parte di tutti gli esseri viventi ma e sopra tutto
dalla
"forma Umana" e per mantenerla tale occorre rispettare delle regole
fondamentali che si possono sintetizzare nel saper controllare il
corpo in
modo che sia  mantenuto il più possibile con un pH fisiologico verso
l'
alcalino.
      La forma Umana è stata progettata per funzionare con un pH
corporeo
neutro, quindi con potere ossido/riducente tendente al neutro e come
tale
deve essere mantenuto per star bene e vivere il più possibile nel
benEssere.
      Per rimanere in quei limiti occorre che ci si alimenti con
diete
idriche di acque le più pure possibili (a basso tenore di minerali
residui)
e con cibi integrali, biologici, con prevalenza di verdura e frutta
crude,
alle volte cotte, pochissime proteine di tipo vegetale e
rarissimamente di
quelle animali, preferendo carne di pesce piccolo (niente molluschi,
crostacei) ed alle volte di piccoli animali terrestri; mai cibarsi di
quelli
grandi nemmeno se sono ancora lattanti; praticando ginnastiche o
movimento
all'aria aperta e con la pelle in contatto con il sole e l'aria,
riposando
adeguatamente, respirando bene e profondamente, cercando di non
crearsi
degli inutili conflitti spirituali oltre a quelli che la vita stessa
propone, arrivando a pensare in positivo il più possibile in modo da
digerire bene anche tutte le asperità della vita.
      Fare all'Amore spesso e bene con il proprio partner, Meditare,
Riflettere, pregare, ascoltare o fare musica melodiosa, ballare con
musiche
rilassanti o gioiose, giocare e passeggiare in mezzo alla Natura,
sono
medicine gratuite che vanno utilizzate il più possibile per mantenersi
in
Perfetta Salute.
      Pubblichiamo alcune dichiarazioni di eminenti personaggi della
scienza
moderna, in materia di aids.
      1. Luc Montagnier, dirige l'Istituto Pasteur di Parigi
(produttore di
vaccini):
      Ecco uno scambio epistolare molto molto illuminante tra
Valendar
Turner (ricercatore e collaboratore della Eleni Eleopulos Papadopulos)
e
Robin Weiss ricercatore inglese famoso per aver. "co-scoperto" il
"virus"
      dell'AIDS. Turner domanda a Weiss di spiegargli se, secondo
lui,
Montagnier isolò effettivamente l'HIV.
      Consigliamo fare molta attenzione a questa piccola discussione
perché
riguarda il vero "noumeno" (quello che è conosciuto dalla ragione
pura)
ovvero il "clou" di questa lunga storia. Ecco la prima lettera:
      On Sun, 21 Feb 1999 11:04:48 +0800,  Valendar Turner scrisse:
      Caro Professor Weiss, Nel Suo commento sulla rivista Nature (New
and
Views), "From Pan to pandemic", Lei ed il Suo collega Dr. Wrangham
affermate, l'origine del HIV-1, il retrovirus che è la principale
causa dell
' AIDS, è stato un puzzle fin dal tempo in cui è stato scoperto da
Barre-Sinoussi ed i suoi colleghi nel 1983".
      In una intervista pubblicata nel 1998 che L. Montagnier ha
rilasciato
al giornalista francese Djamel Tahi, a Montagnier fu chiesto perché
lui ed i
suoi colleghi non pubblicarono le microfotografie elettroniche che
      provano che la banda di 1,16 g/ml (il virus purificato)
contenevano
particelle di HIV isolato.
      Luc Montagnier rispose: "non fu pubblicata tale prova poiché
persino
dopo sforzi titanici, alla densità di 1,16g/ml non potevamo vedere
alcuna
particella con le caratteristiche morfologiche tipiche dei
retrovirus".
      Egli diede simili risposte a domande ripetute, incluso: "Ripeto,
noi
non purificammo", il che significa semplicemente che: non isolammo il
virus
HIV !.
      Considerando questi dati si può correttamente sostenere che
"Barre-Sinoussi e i suoi colleghi nel 1983" scoprirono un
retrovirus ?. NO !
      Inoltre L. Montagnier continua dicendo in un'altra intervista:
"l'aids
non porta inevitabilmente alla morte.
      Per il mantenimento di una buona funzione immunitaria sono
molto
importanti i fattori psicologici. Se indebolite psicologicamente
qualcuno
dicendogli che sta per morire, sono le vostre parole a condannarlo".
      2. Dott. Kary Mullis: "La storia dell'aids è legata ad una lunga
serie
di ricerche che sono state fatte per provare che esisteva un virus
che
causava l'aids: Quei ricercatori che non erano riusciti a dimostrare
che un
virus causava il cancro, hanno affermato che il virus HIV causava
l'aids".
      3. Walter Gilbert (premio Nobel per la chimica nel 1980,
professore di
biologia molecolare ad Harvard):
      "E' assolutamente corretto nell'affermare (sta parlando di
Peter
Duesberg), che nessuna ha dimostrato che l'aids sia causato dal virus
HIV;
ed è assolutamente giusto che i virus circolanti in laboratorio non
possono
essere la causa dell'aids...non sarei assolutamente sorpreso se ci
fossero
altre cause per l'aids e che persino lo HIV non fosse coinvolto". 4.
Charles
Thomas (Professore di biochimica ad Harvard): "Nella pubblica opinione
è
ampiamente diffusa l'idea che il retrovirus chiamato HIV , causa il
gruppo
di malattie chiamate aids. Molti biomedici adesso mettono in dubbio
questa
ipotesi. Proponiamo che una approfondita riconsiderazione delle prove
esistenti a favore e contro questa ipotesi, sia condotta da un
adeguato
gruppo indipendente".
      5. Robert Toot - Bernstein (Scienziato molecolare, autore di
Discovery
and Rethinking aids):
      "Eravamo abituati a credere di sapere che tutti siano ugualmente
a
rischio HIV o aids e che una epidemia eterosessuale fosse inevitabile.
Ma l'
epidemiologia dell'aids deve ancora fornire prove consistenti per
tale
ipotesi".
      6. Liaila O. Afrika (Autore di "Afrikan Holistic Health and
 Nutricide"):
      "Il virus dell'aids è una particella della celllula umana: Non
può
mangiare, riprodursi, crescere, muoversi, attaccare od essere
attaccato, non
è una pianta od animale e non è vivente.
      Un virus non è attivo un mese ed inattivo (inerte) il successivo
e
nemmeno dorme fra i due o cinque anni, prima di attaccare una
persona".
      7. Peter Duesberg (Retrovirologo, membro dell'Accademia
Nazionale
delle Scienze):
      "L'HIV è solo un latente e perfettamente innoffensivo retrovirus
di
cui molti, ma non tutti, i malati di aids possono essere portatori.
Dire che
l'HIV è  la causa dell'aids significa mettere da parte tutto ciò che
sappiamo sui retrovirus. La teoria dell'HIV è inconsistente, assurda
e
paradossale".
      8. Dr. David Rasnick: "In qualità di scienziato dopo 16 anni di
studio
sull'aids, mi sono convinto e reso conto che  questa malattia non
aveva
molto a che fare con la scienza. L'aids è un fenomeno sociologico
costruito
dalla paura. Questo ha creato una sorte di Maccartismo che ha fatto
crollare
tutte le regole di scienza per imporre un miscuglio di credenze
pseudo
scientifiche ad un fragile pubblico".
      9. Joseph Sonnabend (Microbiologo): "Non esiste alcun agente
eziologico specifico dell'aids..la malattia insorge come risultato di
processi cumulativi a seguito di un periodo di esposizione a
molteplici
fattori ambientali".
      10. Serge Lang (professore della Yale University): "Non esiste
nemmeno
una singola definizione appropriata dell'aids sulla quale discorsi o
statistiche si possano verosimilmente basare..il CDC chiama queste
malattie
aids sono quando anticorpi dell'HIV sono presenti in maniera accertata
o
presunta: Se una persona risulta sieronegativa, a queste malattie
viene dato
un altro nome".
      11. Albert Sabin (National Health Institute): "L'attuale
campagna di
educazione e prevenzione si basa sull'asserto che ogni sieropositivo
può
essere considerato agente di contagio, ma di questo non vi è alcuna
prova".
      12. Harry Rubin (Retrovirologo, menbro dell'Accademia Nazionale
delle
Scienze):
      "Non penso che sia stata trovata la causa dell'aids: Penso che
in una
malattia così complessa vi siano, verosimilmente cause multiple. Di
fatto,
chiamarla una malattia singola quando presenta manifestazioni così
diverse,
mi sembra un'esemplificazione eccessiva".
      13. Willner dr. Robert (Autore di Inganno mortale):
      "La maggior parte delle morti per aids controllate dai medici
sono
state provocate del tutto od in parte dal farmaco letale AZT. In molti
casi
il farmaco è stato dato ad individui perfettamente sani e normali che
erano
terrorizzati.. dopo l'inaffidabile test di sieropositività".
      14. Dr.Richard Beltz (Inventore dell'AZT - azidotimina): "L'AZT
non
aveva prospettive per due ragioni: i miei studi hanno mostrato che
era
cancerogeno in ogni dosaggio e che era troppo tossico anche per usi di
breve
periodo".
      15. John Lauritsen (Autore de La guerra dell'AIDS):"Si proclama
che l'
AZT salva la vita. E ancora adesso la maggior parte del credito che
gli si
dà è basato sugli esperimenti della III fase che erano pieni di crepe
e
completamente senza valore".
      16. Baggaley dr. Rachel (British Health Advisor): " Nessuno in
Zambia
muore mai di AIDS; dicono che è per malaria, febbre o tubercolosi".
      17. Neville Hodgkinson (Collaboratore del London Sunday Times):
"Un
nuovo autorevole studio ha messo in luce l'energica evidenza che il
test
dell'aids non ha valore scientifico, confondendo milioni di persone
nel
fargli credere che sono sieropositive quando non è vero che sono
colpite dal
virus. Si è accresciuta la preoccupazione che l'esplosione dell'aids
in
Africa sia stata selvaggiamente esagerata".
      18. Kary Mullis (Inventore del test PCR, Premio Nobel per la
Chimica
nel 1993): "Hanno considerato il gran numero di persone sieropositive
(in
Africa) prima di accorgersi che gli anticorpi della malaria, che in
Africa
hanno tutti, si mostrano nei test come positivi all'HIV".
      19. PhillipE. Johnson (Giornalista) "Ai giornalisti che si
occupano di
storie di  aids, un gruppo di eminenti scienziati ha detto che non vi
è
alcun dubbio che il mondo è minacciato della catastrofica piaga
dell'aids e
mettere in discussione questo fatto è tanto razionale quanto dire che
la
Terra è piatta".
      20. John Lauritsen (Autore di The Great AIDS Hoax): "...L'aids
non è
ne nuovo né unico, ma è stato inventato come parola (ombrello) per
coprire
un complesso di malattie, alcune delle quali erano già state descritte
dalla
medicina nel 1539".
      21. GlaxoWellcome (Casa farmaceutica che produce il Retrovir -
AZT):
"ATTENZIONE il Retrovir (zidovudina) può causare tossicità ematica
(avvelenamento del sangue, ndr) compreso la granulocipetomia e gravi
anemie,
particolarmente in pazienti con malattie ha HIV in fase avanzata. La
piena
innocuità e il profilo di efficienza del Retrovir, non è stata ben
definita,
particolarmente nei confronti di individui affetti da HIV con minor
avanzamento della malattia".
      22. Elinor Burkett, (Autrice di The Greatest Show on Earth):
parlando
dell'industria dell'aids: "... un insieme di certi dottori, politici,
ricercatori negli enti governativi, assicuratori, leader di comunita
gay,
funzionari del CDC, burocrati delle assicurazioni sanitarie e
funerarie,
media... tutti quelli che possono aver intascato o essere stati puniti
o
confusi od aver soggiaciuto all'avidità e all'egoismo".
      23. Tom Bethell (ricercatore alla Hoover Institution): "Il fatto
è,
adesso ne sono convinto, che l'aids non è affatto una malattia: è un
programma di governo".
      24. Geshekter dr. Charles (professore di storia alla California
University, Chico): "Un rapporto del 1994 nel Journal of Infection
Diseases
(rivista delle malattie infettive) ha concluso che il test HIV è
stato
inutile in Africa, ove i germi della tubercolosi, malaria, lebbra sono
così
diffusi che hanno contribuito a dare oltre il 70% di falsi
sieropositivi....
in persone i cui sistemi immunitari sono compromessi per altre ragioni
che
non l'HIV".
      25. Rep. Gil Gutknecht (U.S. House of Representatives, membro
del
Comitato sulla Scienza): "Considerando che esiste una limitata prova
scientifica dell'esatto legame tra HIV e AIDS, è forse etico
prescrivere
AZT, un distruttore del DNA utilizzato 30 anni fa come chemioterapico
per il
cancro, a 150 mila Americani, tra i quali donne incinte e neonati,
come
farmaco anti HIV ?"
      26. Elliot Fox (Giornalista, fondatore dell'Associazione per il
riesame dell'AIDS): "AIDS, la Waterloo del complesso delle industrie
farmaceutiche, è stato descritto come derivante da un virus, a
dispetto
della più che provata evidenza del contrario, scoperto da test su
anticorpi
che si sono dimostrati grossolanamente inaccurati e curato da farmaci
incredibilmente tossici che sono stati definitivamente definiti come
responsabili della sindrome".
      27. Jon Rappaport (Commentatore, giornalista, autore di AIDS,
Inc.):
"Un sacco di gente è cosciente che l'HIV è una burla e che l'AZT
uccide la
gente.... Molta gente si sta accorgendo che questo non è il
comportamento di
un male contagioso".
      28. Giornale  "Bio Tecnology": "Il solo modo per distinguere le
reazioni di produzione di anticorpi dovuti al virus HIV dalle reazioni
di
anticorpi prodotte per cause diverse, sarebbe di isolare il virus
HIV.
Purtroppo il virus NON è stato mai isolato. I test che controllano
gli
anticorpi non sono specifici per un'infezione da virus HIV".
        Pubblichiamo un articolo (in inglese) pubblicato sulla stampa
mondiale negli anni 1980
      PREFACE
      In an extensive article in the Summer-Autumn 1990 issue of "Top
Secret", Prof J. Segal and Dr. L. Segal outline their theory that AIDS
is a
man-made disease, originating at Pentagon bacteriological warfare labs
at
Fort Detrick, Maryland.
      Top Secret is the international edition of the German magazine
Geheim
and is considered by many to be a sister publication to the American
Covert
Action Information Bulletin (CAIB). In fact, Top Secret carries the
Naming
Names column, which CAIB is prevented from doing by the American
government,
and which names CIA agents in different locations in the world. The
article,
named "AIDS: US-Made Monster" and subtitled "AIDS - its Nature and
its
Origins," is lengthy, has a lot of professional terminology and is
dotted
with footnotes.
      The following is my humble attempt to encapsulate its
highlights. It
is recommended that all interested read the original, which is
available at
some bookstores, or can be ordered for $3.50 from:
      Top Secret/Geheim Magazine P.O.Box 270324 5000 Koln 1 Germany
      AIDS FACTS
      "The fatal weakening of the immune system which has given AIDS
its
name (Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome)," write the Segals, "has
been
traced back to a destruction or a functional failure of the T4
lymphocytes,
also called 'helper cells`, which play a regulatory role in the
production
of antibodies in the immune system." In the course of the illness,
the
number of functional T4- cells is reduced greatly so that new anti-
bodies
cannot be produced and the defenseless patient remains exposed to a
range of
infections that under other circumstances would have been harmless.
Most
AIDS patients die from opportunistic infections rather than from the
AIDS
virus itself. The initial infection is characterized by diarrhea,
erysipelas
and intermittent fever. An apparent recovery follows after 2-3 weeks,
and in
many cases the patient remains without symptoms and functions normally
for
years. Occasionally a swelling of the lymph glands, which does not
affect
the patient's well-being, can be observed.
      After several years, the pre-AIDS stage, known as ARC (Aids-
Related
Complex) sets in. This stage includes disorders in the digestive
tract,
kidneys and lungs. In most cases it develops into full-blown AIDS in
about a
year, at which point opportunistic illnesses occur. Parallel to this
syndrome, disorders in various organ systems occur, the most severe in
the
brain, the symptoms of which range from motoric disorders to severe
dementia
and death.
      This set of symptoms, say the Segals, is identical in every
detail
with the Visna sickness which occurs in sheep, mainly in Iceland.
(Visna
means tiredness in Icelandic). However, the visna virus is not
pathogenic
for human beings.
      The Segals note that despite the fact that AIDS is transmitted
only
through sexual intercourse, blood transfusions and non- sterile
hypodermic
needles, the infection has spread dramatically. During the first few
years
after its discovery, the number of AIDS patients doubled every six
months,
and is still doubling every 12 months now though numerous measures
have been
taken against it.
      Based on these figures, it is estimated that in the US, which
had
120,000 cases of AIDS at the end of 1988, 900,000 people will have
AIDS or
will have died of it by the end of 1991. It is also estimated that
the
number of people infected is at least ten times the number of those
suffering from an acute case of AIDS.
      That in the year 1995 there will be between 10-14 million cases
of
AIDS and an additional 100 million people infected, 80 percent of them
in
the US, while a possible vaccination will not be available before 1995
by
the most optimistic estimates. Even when such vaccination becomes
available,
it will not help those already infected. These and following figures
have
been reached at by several different mainstream sources, such as the
US
Surgeon General and the Chief of the medical services of the US Army.
      Say the Segals: "AIDS does not merely bring certain dangers with
it;
it is clearly a programmed catastrophe for the human race, whose
magnitude
is comparable only with that of a nuclear war." They later explain
what they
mean by "programmed," showing that the virus was produced by humans,
namely
Dr. Robert Gallo of the Bethesda Cancer Research Center in Maryland.
When
proceeding to prove their claims, the Segals are careful to note that:
"We
have given preference to the investigative results of highly renowned
laboratories, whose objective contents cannot be doubted. We must
emphasize,
in this connection, that we do not know of any findings that have
been
published in professional journals that contradict our hypotheses."
      DISCOVERING AIDS
      The first KNOWN cases of AIDS occurred in New York in 1979. The
first
DESCRIBED cases were in California in 1979. The virus was isolated in
Paris
in May 1983, taken from a French homosexual who had returned home ill
from a
trip to the East Coast of the US. One year later, Robert Gallo and
his
co-workers at the Bethesda Cancer Research Center published their
discovery
of the same virus, which is cytotoxic, i.e poisonous to cells.
      Shortly after publishing his discovery, Gallo stated to
newspapers
that the virus had developed by a natural process from the Human
Adult
Leukemia virus, HTLV-1, which he had previously discovered. However,
this
claim was not published in professional publications, and soon after,
Alizon
and Montagnier, two researchers of the Pasteur Institute in Paris
published
charts of HTLV-1 and HIV, showing that the viruses had basically
different
structures. They also declared categorically that they knew of no
natural
process by which one of these two forms could have evolved into the
other.
      According to the professional "science" magazine, the fall 1984
annual
meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science
(AAAS),
was almost entirely devoted to the question of: to what extent new
pathogenic agents could be produced via human manipulation of genes.
According to the Segals, AIDS
      was practically the sole topic of discussion.
      THE AIDS VIRUS
      The Segals discuss the findings of Gonda et al, who compared the
HIV,
visna and other closely-related viruses and found that the visna virus
is
the most similar to HIV. The two were, in fact, 60% identical in
1986.
According to findings of the Hahn group, the mutation rate of the HIV
virus
was about a million times higher than that of similar viruses, and
that on
the average a 10% alteration took place every two years. That would
mean
that in 1984, the difference between HIV and visna would have been
only 30%,
in 1982- 20%, 10% in 1980 and zero in 1978. "This means," say the
Segals,
"that at this time visna viruses changed into HIV, receiving at the
same
time the ability to become parasites in human T4-cells and the high
genetic
instability that is not known in other retroviruses. This is also
consistent
with the fact that the first cases of AIDS appeared about one year
later, in
the spring of 1979."
      "In his comparison of the genomes of visna and HIV," add the
Segals,
"Coffin hit upon a remarkable feature.
      The env (envelope) area of the HIV genome, which encodes the
envelope
proteins which help the virus to attach itself to the host cell, is
about
300 nucleotides longer than the same area in visna.
      This behavior suggests that an additional piece has been
inserted into
the genomes of the visna virus, a piece that alters the envelope
proteins
and enables them to bind themselves to the T4-receptors.
      BUT THIS SECTION BEHAVES LIKE A BIOLOGICALLY ALIEN BODY,  which
does
not match the rest of the system biochemically. (emphasis mine)
      The above mentioned work by Gonda et al shows that the HIV virus
has a
section of about 300 nucleotides, which does not exist in the visna
virus.
That length corresponds with what Coffin described. That section is
particularly unstable, which indicates that it is an alien object.
According
to the Segals, it "originates in an HTLV-1 genome, (discovered by
Gallo-ED)
for the likelihood of an accidental occurrence in HIV of a genome
sequence
60% identical with a section of the HTLV-1 that is 300 nucleotides in
length
is zero." Since the visna virus is incapable of attaching itself to
human T4
receptors, it must have been the transfer of the HTLV-1 genome section
which
gave visna the capability to do so. In other words, the addition of
HTLV-1
to visna made the HIV virus. In addition, the high mutation rate of
the HIV
genome has been explained by another scientific team, Chandra et al,
by the
fact that it is "a combination of two genome parts which are alien to
each
other BY ARTIFICIAL MEANS rather than by a natural process of
evolution,
because this process would have immediately eliminated, through
natural
selection, systems that are so replete with disorders."
      "These are the facts of the case," say the Segals.  "HIV is
essentially a visna virus which carries an additional protein monomer
of
HTLV-1 that has an epitope capable of bonding with T4 receptors.
Neither
Alizon and Montagnier nor any other biologist know of any natural
mechanism
that would make it possible
      for the epitope to be transferred from HTLV-1 to the visna
virus. For
this reason we can come to only one conclusion: that this gene
combination
arose by artificial means, through gene manipulation."
      THE CONSTRUCTION OF HIV
      "The construction of a recombinant virus by means of gene
manipulation
is extraordinarily expensive, and it requires a large number of
highly
qualified personnel, complicated equipment and expensive high
security
laboratories.
      Moreover, the product would have no commercial value. Who,
then," ask
the Segals, "would have provided the resources for a type of research
that
was aimed solely at the production of a new disease that would be
deadly to
human beings?"
      The English sociologist Allistair Hay (as well as Paxman et al
in "A
Higher Form of Killing"-ED), published a document whose   authenticity
has
been confirmed by the US Congress, showing that a representative of
the
Pentagon requested in 1969 additional   funding for biological
warfare
research. The intention was to   create, within the next ten years, a
new
virus that would not be susceptible to the immune system, so that the
afflicted patient would not be able to develop any defense against it.
Ten
years later, in the spring of 1979, the first cases of AIDS appeared
in New
York.
      "Thus began a phase of frantic experimentation," say the
Segals.
      One group was working on trying to cause animal pathogens to
adapt
themselves to life in human beings.
      This was done under the cover of searching for a cure for
cancer. The
race was won by Gallo, who described his findings in 1975. A year
later,
Gallo described gene manipulations he was conducting. In 1980 he
published
his discovery of HTLV.
      In the fall of 1977, a P4 (highest security category of
laboratory, in
which human pathogens are subjected to genetic   manipulations)
laboratory
was officially opened in building 550   of Fort Detrick, MD, the
Pentagon's
main biological warfare   research center. "In an article in 'Der
Spiegel`,
Prof. Mollings point out that this type of gene manipulation was
still
extremely difficult in 1977. One would have had to have a genius as
great as
Robert Gallo for this purpose, note the Segals."
      Lo and behold. In a supposed compliance with the international
accord banning the research, production and storage of biological
weapons,
part of Fort Detrick was "demilitarized" and the virus  section
renamed the
"Frederick Cancer Research Facility". It was  put under the direction
of the
Cancer Research Institute in   neighboring Bethesda, whose director
was no
other than Robert   Gallo. This happened in 1975, the year Gallo
discovered
HTLV. Explaining how the virus escaped, the Segals note that in the
US,
biological agents are traditionally tested on prisoners who are
incarcerated for long periods, and who are promised freedom if   they
survive the test. However, the initial HIV infection symptoms are mild
and
followed by a seemingly healthy patient.
      "Those who conducted the research must have concluded that the
new
virus was...not so virulent that it could be considered for  military
use,
and the test patients, who had seemingly recovered,  were given their
freedom. Most of the patients were professional  criminals and New
York
City, which is relatively close, offered them a suitable milieu.
Moreover,
the patients were exclusively men, many of them having a history of
homosexuality and drug abuse, as is often the case in American
prisons. 1111
      It is understandable why AIDS broke out precisely in 1979,
precisely
among men and among drug users, and precisely in New York City,"
assert the
Segals. They go on to explain that whereas in cases of infection by
means of
sexual contact, incubation periods are two  years and more, while in
cases
of massive infection via blood  transfusions, as must have been the
case
with prisoners, incubation periods are shorter than a year.
      "Thus, if the new virus was ready at the beginning of 1978 and
if the
experiments  began without too much  delay, then the first cases of
full-
blown  AIDS in 1979 were  exactly the result that could have been
expected."
      In the next three lengthy chapters, the Segals examine other
theories, "legends" as they call them, of the origins of AIDS.
Dissecting
each claim, they show that they have no scientific standing, providing
also
the findings of other scientists. They   also bring up the arguments
of
scientists and popular writers who have been at the task of
discounting them
as "conspiracy theorists" and show these writers' shortcomings.
Interested
readers will have to read the original article to follow those
debates. I
will only quote two more paragraphs:
      "We often heard the argument that experiments with human
volunteers
are part of a barbaric past, and that they would be   impossible in
the US
today... We wish to present one single   document whose authenticity
is
beyond doubt.
      An investigative   commission of the US House of
Representatives
presented in October 1986 a final report concerning the Manhattan
Project.
According to this document, between 1945 and 1975 at least 695
American
citizens were exposed to dangerous doses of radioactivity. Some of
them were
prisoners who had volunteered,   but they also included residents of
old-age
homes, inmates of insane asylums, handicapped people in nursing homes,
and
even   normal patients in public hospitals; most of them were
subjected to
these experiments without their permission. Thus the 'barbaric  past`
is not
really a thing of the past."
      "It is remarkable that most of these experiments were carried
out in
university institutes and federal hospitals, all of which are named in
the
report.
      Nonetheless, these facts remained secret until 1984, and even
then a
Congressional committee that was equipped with all the necessary
authorization needed two years in order to bring these facts to life.
We are
often asked how the work on the AIDS virus could have been kept
secret. Now,
experiments performed on a few dozen prisoners in a laboratory that
is
subject to military security can be far more easily kept secret than
could
be the Manhattan Project."
      Black Crawling Systems @ V0iD Information Archives ( 6 1 7 )  4
8 2  -
6 3 5 6
      The following articles are extracted from New Dawn magazine,
Volume
No. 1 & 2. (C) Copyright April 1992. New Dawn, GPO Box 3126FF,
Melbourne,
3001, Australia.
      Shocking Revelations on AIDS Research by Our North American
Correspondent Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, national spokesman for Minister
Louis
Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, dropped a bombshell on the
nation's
capital at a mass rally held at All Souls Unitarian Church on
September 8.
Although the event had been planned for some time to celebrate the
10th
anniversary of the Washington, D.C. ministry of Dr. Muhammad, he
turned the
event into a report on his recent fact-finding mission to the African
nation
of Kenya.
      Dr. Muhammad startled the standing-room-only audience when he
announced that a research team working out of the Kenyan Medical
Research
Institute, led by the Harvard-trained immunologist Dr. David Koech,
had made
dramatic advances in the treatment of AIDS. Dr. Muhammad also charged
that
the U.S. government was leading a major effort by the international
medical
establishment to suppress this groundbreaking research.
      Among those who packed the church to hear Dr. Muhammad speak on
the
theme "Can We Survive Genocide," were clergy from several
denominations
along the East Coast, civil rights leaders, community activists,
leaders of
the Nation of Islam, elected officials and political leaders from
Maryland,
Virginia, and the District of Columbia, and hundreds of ordinary
citizens.
      The introduction of Washington's former Mayor Marion Barry - the
man
on whom the Bush administration spent millions to remove him from
office -
brought the house to its feet in an extended ovation.
      A Policy of Genocide
      In his remarks, Dr. Muhammad quoted extensively from a 1985
article
authored by Lyndon LaRouche, "The Looming Extinction of the 'White
Race'".
In that piece, LaRouche documents that the imperial policies intrinsic
to
oligarchism have set into motion the self-destruction of the
population
levels and economies of those "white" nations that have complicitly
tolerated oligarchical policies - most specifically the United States
and
Great Britain.
      LaRouche states that since what the oligarchs call the "Great
White
Race" is dying out at an accelerating rate, and threatening the
supremacy of
the Anglo-American financial establishment, we witness a fanatically
Malthusian commitment to a policy of genocide directed against people
of
colour; a genocide consciously implemented through the
conditionalities
policies of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
      "That," Dr. Muhammad charged, "is one of the reasons they've got
him
locked up; because he's got the guts to tell the truth".
      Dr. Muhammad went on to present extensive evidence that the
policy of
deliberate genocide is fully operational. He described the CIA's
support for
the cause of population control during George Bush's tenure as
Director of
Central Intelligence, and reported the contents of National Security
Memorandum 200, written during the Ford administration, which advised
that
the preservation of U.S. political and commercial interests "will
require
that the President and Secretary of State treat the subject of
population
growth control in the third world as a matter of paramount
importance...."
To the amazement of the audience, Muhammad identified the authors of
the
internal memo as Henry Kissinger and Gen. Brent Scowcroft, now Bush's
national security adviser.
      (See The New Dawn Vol.1 No.1, May, 1991)
      Dr. Muhammad used the case of Brazil, which has the second
largest
black population in the world, to prove that the memorandum was being
implemented. "Today in Brazil, 40% of the women of childbearing age
have
been surgically sterilized with funds provided by the USAID," he said,
"and
90% of those sterilized women are black."
      He insisted that this genocide was the real agenda of Bush's New
World
Order; that it not only motivated the invasion of Panama and the
kidnapping
of Gen. Manuel Noriega, but also the continuing murder of the nation
of
Iraq. He told the audience that these were just the opening battles in
the
war of the advanced sector nations of the North against the
developing
nations of the South. Dr. Muhammad denounced George Bush as a wicked
man who
cherished his membership in the satanic secret society Skull and
Bones. He
reminded the audience that the "skull and bones" was also the emblem
on the
flag flown by the slave traders who raided Africa, as well as of the
latter
day pirates.
      AIDS and 'population control'
      Given the Anglo-American establishment's commitment to mass
murder,
the effort to suppress the promising research of Dr. Koech and his
colleagues should come as no surprise to anyone, the Nation of Islam
leader
said. In fact, he contended, there is substantial evidence to indicate
that
AIDS was developed as a race-specific population control measure. Dr.
Muhammad ridiculed the theory that AIDS originated when the virus made
a
species jump from the African green monkey to the African population.
"We
lived with the green monkey for thousands of years and never had any
problems. The green monkey isn't our enemy. The IMF is."
      Dr. Muhammad, who is a trained surgeon, said he traveled to
Kenya to
see for himself what the alpha interferon derivative, which goes under
the
trade name Kemron, was really all about. Dr. Muhammad reported that
he
interviewed the research team in their laboratory, was permitted to
review
their data, and to examine AIDS patients currently undergoing
treatment with
Kemron and with a new, more advanced form of Kemron, the drug Immunex,
which
contains a greater number of alpha interferon components than the
original
drug.
      Dr. Muhammad stressed that although the new drug was only a
treatment
and not a cure for the deadly HIV virus, he was tremendously hopeful
and
encouraged by the dramatic improvement in the condition of those
undergoing
treatment.
      Dr. Muhammad introduced Dr. Barbara Justice, a well-known New
York
City-based cancer surgeon who has sent 54 AIDS patients to Kenya for
treatment over the past year. Dr. Justice reported that 97% of her
patients
showed marked improvement within weeks of beginning treatment, and
that most
were able to regain some degree of normalcy in their ability to
function.
      It has been almost impossible for anyone outside of Kenya
administering Kemron on an experimental basis in the to assess the
work of
the Kenyan team, which has been treatment of AIDS since 1989, since it
has
been systematically blacked out of the scientific literature. Dr.
Koech was
to present his data, first at the International AIDS Conference in
the
United States in 1987, and then again at the 1991 AIDS Conference in
Italy.
      On both occasions, his invitation was inexplicably withdrawn.
      Last year, Dr. Koech decided to take his data directly to the
U.S.
medical community, and an extensive U.S. lecture tour was planned.
That tour
was abruptly cancelled when the State Department refused to issue Dr.
Koech
the necessary permission to enter the United States.
      This is certainly not the first time that important AIDS
research has
been suppressed. Quite the contrary, it is part of a continuing
criminal
pattern of lies and cover-up. The importance of a rapid evaluation of
Dr.
Koech's work with Kemron and Immunex is obvious. Currently, the only
treatment available to AIDS victims is the drug AZT; however, AZT
therapy is
prohibitively expensive and carries with it extremely destructive
side
effects, especially with prolonged use. Additionally, a recent study
conducted by the U.S. Army showed that, for unexplained reasons, AZT
therapy
is not only largely ineffective in the treatment of blacks, but that,
in
fact, AZT seems to aggravate symptoms in an alarming number of black
patients.
      Kenya's President Daniel Arap Moi clearly finds the Koech
team's
findings to be convincing. He recently announced that his government
was
building a factory to allow the mass production of alpha
interferon.**
      AIDS - Man-Made Holocaust
      The fact that AIDS is a man-made virus created in U.S.
laboratories
has been covered up
      By JASON JEFFREY
      "America should withdraw from the Mediterranean, Europe and all
foreign bases and it should save that money to create jobs for 12
million
unemployed Americans, and contribute towards the elimination of the
diseases
it manufactured like AIDS which was produced by the CIA at its
laboratories
and tested on American prisoners who took the virus with them to the
outside
world when released from prison and then it spread throughout the
world." -
Muammar Al-Qadhafi speaking at the International Conference for Peace
in the
Mediterranean, 4-6 May, 1990.
      On July 4, 1984, the Indian daily Patriot published a
horrifying
report that the disease AIDS was believed to  have originated from a
virus
created in the laboratories at the U.S. germ warfare research
institute at
Fort
      Detrick, Maryland. The editor explained that the information had
come
from a well-known American scientist
      and anthropologist who expressed the fear that India might face
a
danger from the disease in the near future.
      The American had to remain anonymous. He was obviously in danger
for
having disclosed so deadly a secret.
      At that time, when the full horror of the incurable disease was
not
known Patriot reported that the World Health Organisation believed
AIDS
posed the gravest threat to the entire population of the world. More
on the
World Health Organisation later.  The British Sunday Express, 26
October,
1986, with banner headlines, and an "exclusive" label, announced "AIDS
made
in lab. shock." The front-page story said that the virus was created
during
laboratory experiments which "went disastrously wrong." It added that
a
massive cover-up had kept the secret from the world. The Sunday
Express
quoted a British expert, Dr. John Seale, who first reported his
conclusion
that the virus was man-made last August, 1986, in the Royal Society
of
Medicine Journal.
      He said that his report was met with a "deadly silence" from
the
medical profession, and that made him very suspicious. The editor of
the
Journal agreed, according to Dr. Seale, that "it sounded like a
conspiracy
of silence."
      The second expert quoted by the Sunday Express, was Prof. Jacob
Segal,
retired Director of the Institute of Biology in Berlin. It said, "our
investigators have revealed that two U.S. Embassy officials made a two-
hour
visit to Prof. Segal at his home two weeks ago questioning him about
what he
knows, what he thinks, where he got his information, and what he
intends
doing with his report." The Professor told the reporters, "one said he
was a
historian, and the other said he was a political consul. But I am
positive
they were from the CIA, and that they were deeply concerned that the
cover-up over the origin of AIDS was going to be exposed."
      I told them I had known that in the mid-70s experiments were
being
carried out at Fort Detrick, where the U.S. Army Medical Research
Command
has its headquarters, on volunteer long-term prisoners who were
promised
their freedom after the tests. Almost certainly the scientists were
unaware
of the extent of their terrible creation - the AIDS virus.
      WHO Involvement ?
      The third expert quoted in the Sunday Express was Dr. Robert
Strecker,
an internist and gastroentarologist from Glendale, California, who
stated
"it must have been genetically engineered." Strecker believes, after
years
of exhaustive research, that the AIDS virus is indeed man-made.
Strecker has
alleged that AIDS was engineered at the request of the World Health
Organisation and other scientific groups who, according to Strecker,
injected the disease during preventative vaccines. WHO, he says, along
with
the International Agency for Research on Cancer and The National
Institute
on Health, requested the production of a virus that would attack the
immune
system's T-cells. AIDS, he says, is a hybrid of two animal viruses -
bovine
leukemia (found in cattle) and a sheep brain virus called visna. This
new
virus was given as vaccinations in Haiti, Brazil, Africa and the
Caribbean
by WHO in a 13-year campaign against smallpox in Third World nations,
reports indicate.  Strecker, in his 97-minute videotape, "The
Strecker
Memorandum," cites specific documentation supporting theories that
AIDS is a
result of that direct request. For example, from Volume 47 of Bulletin
of
the World Health Organisation (1972), page 259:  "The effects of
virus
infection of different cell types (e.g., Macrophages, T and B
lymphocytes)
should be studied in greater detail with morphological changes
perhaps
serving as an indication of functional alteration..." "The
possibility
should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus may
itself
be impaired if theinfecting virus damages more or less selectively the
cells
responding to the viral antigens..."
      In fact, a May 11, 1987 frontpage article in the London Times,
headlined "Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus," said WHO was
investigating new evidence suggesting that "immunization from the
smallpox
vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno
defense
virus infection (HIV).
      " Vaccinia was the actual vaccine given as smallpox deterrents
during
the WHO project. Were the AIDS infections intentional, accidental or
coincidence?
      According to Strecker in his "Memorandum," a key part of the
actual
study "was to be the time relationship between infection and antigen
administration," which suggests WHO officials - and other agencies who
were
directly dependent on the United States government for research grants
- had
to have known.
      The denials were not long in coming. But the British Sunday
Telegraph
exposed itself. It said the story (the Sunday Express article) was
invented
by the Russians "to smear the Americans," and recalled that it had
appeared
in the Soviet journal, Literary Gazette. It said this paper based its
report
on the Patriot - and that the Patriot report did not exist!  Professor
Segal
describes as "ludicrous and scientifically incredible" the theory that
the
virus came from African green monkeys. One thing is certain: the
controversy
surrounding the AIDS virus will not die.
      A Weapon Against Black People ?
      Zear Miles, a Black industrial engineer, who has studied the
AIDS
virus and its origins for about six years has stated that he has proof
from
various documentation and letters from other AIDS researchers to prove
that
the virus was made in an American military lab as a means to suppress
Blacks.  In his document entitled "Rape Africa", Miles researched the
origin
of the AIDS virus from 1952, when the federal government had enough
blood
types and characteristics of every nationality in the world up to the
King
Alfred plan which called for the extinction of Blacks in national
security
emergencies.  Miles learned that through National Security Council
Memorandum 46, dated 1978, which called for a possible way to gauge
and
control the impact of the growing Black movement, the government was
researching possible ways to suppress Black hostility toward the
authorities. Later called the King Alfred plan, the scheme called for
the
extinction of Blacks by the year 2000 with an AIDS-like virus.  Miles
said
he also gauged the increasing number of AIDS cases in which the number
of
Black contractors have gone up significantly compared with Whites,
citing
that the AIDS virus attacked a Black person's immune system and
destroyed it
in six weeks as opposed to a White person's time of six months.
      The Evidence
      What is the evidence available to the layman. First, the initial
cases
were reported in New York and there is no dispute that Fort Detrick
was
working on immunological defence against infection. The British
Guardian
reported on October 27, 1986, that in 1969 evidence was given to a
Washington Appropriation Committee that "within the next five or ten
years
it would probably be possible to make a new infective micro-organism
which
would differ from any known disease causing organism. Most important,
that
it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic properties
on
which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious
disease."
"Refractory" means, according to the Oxford Dictionary, "not yielding
to
treatment." AIDS answers precisely to that description.
      On September 24, 1986, the Daily Telegraph reported from
Washington,
"Enough of a debilitating virus to infect the whole world, disappeared
from
an American germwarfare laboratory five years ago, and has never been
traced, an environment group claimed yesterday in a Washington Court
action
aimed at halting biological weapons research." In 1968, the J.D.
Bernal
Peace Library organised a conference on the dangers of biological
warfare
research. Ritchie Calder said then that among the weapons being
stockpiled
were some designed to bring about genetic changes. He said the
"doomsday bug
was under wraps" and that there was a conspiracy of silence about
germ
weapons because the implications were so frightening." He told the
British
Daily Mirror after his address that "somewhere in the world a germ is
being
cultured to which we would have no natural resistance and to which
there
would be no sure defence." A precise description of AIDS.  The
British
Observer, on June 30, 1968, quoted from an article in the Journal of
General
Microbiology by W.D. Lawton of Fort Detrick, and R.C. Morris and T.W.
Burrows of the British microbiological research station at Porton.
      One paragraph said, "By engineering the genetics of individual
strains, microbiologists aim to produce a single strain containing the
most
deadly combination of properties." Again, a description of AIDS.
      The article says that at that time Porton, according to the
government, was concerned only with defence applications of research,
but
Fort Detrick was only committed to developing microbiological weapons
for
offence.
      The Japanese carried out germ warfare research in occupied
China
during the war. Some of these criminals were captured by the Soviets
and
duly tried and sentenced. Others were given immunity by the Americans
and
taken to work at Fort Detrick.  In 1969, after the AIDS virus was
loose,
negotiations began on a Convention banning biological weapons, and it
came
into force in 1972. In its first review conference in 1980, it was
reported
that 80 countries had ratified.
      But there is no provision in the Convention to ban research or
for
verification.  Nichola Sims, who has written a book on biological
disarmament, wrote recently, "the failure of the Convention to impose
any
restrictions even on 'offensive' biological warfare research, has
been
frequently criticised." And she refers to popular fears that a "super
germ
breakthrough in the means of waging biological or toxin warfare is
just
around the corner and may induce the possessor of such a germ to break
out
of the Convention." She quotes Dr. Robert K. Mikulak of the U.S. Arms
Control and Disarmament Agency for the statement that "there is no
justification for classified military research on the question in any
country." But so far there is no inspection or verification.
      A much more recent accusation against the United States for the
manufacturing of the AIDS virus comes from the Libyan UN Ambassador,
Mr. Ali
Ahmed Elhouderi. On January 9, 1992, at a press conference, he stated
that
the AIDS virus was produced in a laboratory probably as a weapon.
      He said, "We think it is man-made and it was done in
laboratories. And
it was not, as suggested, coming from monkeys in Africa." He also
suggested
that the virus had been manufactured at the time of the Vietnam War.
These
statements fit perfectly into place as research would have been
carried out
at that time at Fort Detrick for offensive purposes against the North
Vietnamese.
      AIDS Was Man-Made
      On all the circumstantial evidence, the layman will almost
certainly
reject the idea that the escape of the man-made AIDS virus was the
result of
a disastrous error during innocent civilian research. We can
assuredly
conclude that it was the result of germ warfare research, and the
finger of
guilt points to the United States.
      The scientists could not have visualised that they would let
loose a
so-far incurable disease that may and possibly will wipe out
millions,
particularly in the Third World, where the majority of the world's
population lives. Never was the need greater for the nations to drop
their
differences and to concentrate all their skill and resources in a
world-wide
battle against this terrible threat, and to end the horror of germ
warfare
research.
      The Mystery of Skull Valley By NIKOLAI FILIPPOV
      Because of an error made by an airman testing a new germ weapon,
a
deadly virus attacks the population of a small town in highland Utah,
USA.
An incurable disease begins to kill people like a plague epidemic.
      In an attempt to cover up the traces of their crime, the
military
authorities artificially cause a landslide that buries the town and
doom
chance survivors to lifelong isolation.
      This is the plot of Vector, a novel by Henry Sutton, an
American
author. This book is based on dramatic events during which the victims
were
fortunately not people but animals.  March 14-20, 1968 was a black
week for
American farmers grazing sheep in the remote pasturelands of semi-
desert
Skull Valley, Utah. About 6,500 sheep died there in those seven days
under
mysterious circumstances.
      Even more of a mystery was that people, cattle and other animals
in
the area were unscathed.  Everybody - farmers, residents of Utah,
journalists - felt certain that the accident was linked to the US
Army
chemical and bacteriological testing ground in Dugway with an area of
several thousand square kilometres in the vicinity of Skull Valley.
Indeed,
at that very time the thousands of Dugway employees were carrying out
large
scale experiments in preparation for further escalation of the
chemical war
and the start of a germ war in Vietnam.  For a whole year the Defence
Department emphatically denied that animals in Skull Valley were
being
affected by the chemical or biological agents disseminated in the
atmosphere
during the test. In an attempt at a cover-up, experts at the proving
ground
advanced hypotheses which must have seemed untenable even to laymen
about
the sheep having been killed by poisonous plants or a natural
epizootic.
      However, an inquiry by Utah authorities in collaboration with
veterinarians and health experts compelled the Pentagon to admit its
responsibility for the death of the sheep. Even so, no one at Dugway
was
punished.
      The blame for a terrible crime posing a real threat to people's
health
due to a gross violation of safety standards in conducting tests was
placed
on an unfortunate accident.
      According to the official version formulated under the direction
of
the U.S. military authorities, a test of TMU-28/B spray tanks with
nerve
agent VX, was carried out at Dugway on March 13, 1968.
      The gas was dispersed from an F-4E jet bomber by means of two
spray
tanks with a total capacity of 1,200 litres. The bomber flew at an
altitude
of 40 to 45 m. During the test something went wrong with one of the
tanks
(or so the version ran), and besides, the direction of the wind
varied, with
the result that part of the nerve gas was carried beyond the proving
ground.
A cloud of aerosol VX allegedly contaminated pasturelands on an area
of
400-500 sq. km. Skull Valley was not the only area where sheep died,
for a
cloud of aerosol VX reached Res Valley, killing sheep 70 km away from
where
the poison gas had been released.  Anyone who has read publications
dealing
with the accident in Skull Valley and Res Valley is bound to detect a
contradiction between the military authorities' version and the
facts.
      The Pentagon has yet to explain why a whole year passed before
it made
up its mind about what chemical or biological agent caused the death
of the
sheep outside Dugway. If the Dugway test had to do only with VX, then
that
gas was the only cause of the sheep's death and this could have been
stated
at once.
      There is reason to presume that over a short period experiments
were
carried out at Dugway involving a whole range of poison gases and
biological
agents. But it is logical to suppose that even in such a contingency
experts
should know well the properties and casualty effects of the test
materials.
And this implies that researchers must have had no difficulty in
ascertaining the nature of the agent which killed so many sheep.
      The official story of the experiment of March 13, 1968, says
that the
wind carried beyond Dugway, in the form of vapours and highly
dispersed
aerosol, a mere nine kg, or 0.8 per cent, of the total amount of VX
gas to
be dispersed. Field chemical control cannot ensure such a degree of
accuracy. But the authors of the version needed to cite some figure in
order
to make people believe that the sheep had been killed by a nerve gas.
      At the same time, the Pentagon wanted to conceal from the public
the
real danger posed by chemical weapon tests in the atmosphere to
residents of
Utah and so it withheld information about the actual amount of gas
released
over Skull Valley.  The Pentagon officials suggested that the
contamination
level in the Skull Valley pastureland where deaths occurred among
sheep
averaged a mere 0.02 gram per hectare.
      Let us note by way of comparison that to kill humans, it would
be
necessary according to U.S. data available to disseminate from one to
three
kilograms of VX per hectare of target, or 100 thousand times more than
the
contamination level in Skull Valley given in the official version.
Reports
said that in a flock totalling 2,800 sheep, 2,500 or 90 per cent,
were
killed. No such effect is possible where the VX contamination level is
0.02
gram per hectare.  A publication put out by the Dugway proving ground
said
that during the test on March 13, 1968, the greatest distance at which
VX
drops spilled on the ground had been 5.4 km and not 70 km, as the
official
version would have it. The Pentagon's information on one and the same
fact
varies from document to document and from period to period. Surely
this
shows that the version is false.  A contaminated cloud spreading wide
in the
atmosphere only retains vapours and minute particles of aerosol which
do not
settle on the ground and can be inhaled. It follows that had such a
cloud
really floated over Skull Valley, it would have caused inhalational
casualties in other animals as well, including cattle and horses, but
no
such thing happened, according to documentary evidence.  In the early
days
after the accident, before the hypothesis about VX was advanced,
doubts were
expressed even by Brig. Gen. William Stone. He rightly asked why the
gas had
only killed sheep without affecting people. There were also other
moot
points. Why were the diseased sheep shot dead ?
      Why was no attempt made to save them by evacuating them to an
uncontaminated area or by treating them with atropine or other
antidotes?
Marr Fawcett, a veterinarian of Utah, refused to believe that the
sheep had
been poisoned with VX, for in that case many of them could, in his
opinion,
have been saved by means of antidotes.  Dr. Kent Van Kampen, a
veterinary
pathologist in Utah, said in April 1968, shortly after the accident,
that as
early as March 17, 1968, the supposition that the sheep had been hit
by a
chemical poison affecting the nervous system could have been refuted
without
difficulty since all symptoms of such poisoning were lacking.
      The death of an animal poisoned with a nerve gas such as VX is
accompanied by spasms and paresis of muscles in the limbs. Yet judging
by
what sheep herders said in the early days of the inquiry into the
accident,
dying sheep had shown no signs of spasms. True, later on someone saw
to it
that a videotape recording allegedly illustrating the Skull Valley
accident
was projected widely. The tape showed the death of a single sheep
shaking
with spasms as a group of civilians looked on.  One year after the
accident,
Kent Van Kampen and Marr Fawcett contributed in collaboration with
other
experts of Utah an article to the Journal of the American Veterinary
Medical
Association setting out the causes and circumstances of the sheep's
death in
Skull Valley, their version tallying with the Pentagon's. There was a
footnote saying that in writing their article, the authors had
enjoyed
expert assistance (it is easy enough to guess what kind of assistance)
in
particular from Dr. Mortimer Rothenberg, the science director at
Dugway, and
Dr. Bernard MacNamara of Edgewood Arsenal, the chief U.S. Army centre
for
the development of chemical and germ weapons.
      We might as well note at this point that shortly after the
sheep's
death in Skull Valley Dr. Rothenberg, trying to exonerate Dugway from
blame
for the accident, declared that the symptoms displayed by the sheep
had
nothing whatever in common with those of nerve gas poisoning.  And so,
it
took the Pentagon a year to invent an explanation for the sheep's
death and
make the civilian experts mentioned above present its version as their
own,
thereby striking a bargain with their conscience. The videotape which
showed
a sheep's death from VX was intended to serve the same purpose. But
the
forgery was too crude for knowledgeable people to mistake it for the
truth.
They realised at once that the "documentary" showed a sheep injected
with a
nerve gas by means of a syringe, that is, in the same way as this is
done in
demonstrating the effect of nerve gases on animals.
      They deduced this from the absence of any other living or dead
sheep
on the screen as well as from the presence of people wearing no gas
masks or
protective clothes, whereas safety regulations forbid anyone to enter
without taking these precautions in an area contaminated by VX to a
degree
killing livestock.
      There is no such ban where a poison gas is injected into the
body of
an animal outside a contaminated area.
      A further fact worthy of note is that the worker's teams which
buried
the dead sheep had no gas masks on, judging by other videotapes and
various
photographs. This is permissible only when the nature of an agent
which has
caused the death of animals is known for certain. Furthermore, it is
necessary to note that the agent used was completely harmless to
humans.
This detail, like the others cited above, indicates that the sheep in
Skull
Valley were killed by something other than nerve gas.  The death of
livestock so far away from the testing ground, as in the case of
Skull
Valley, could only be caused by a biological agent. Experts could
establish
without difficulty that nine litres of biological agent is enough to
generate a pathogenic aerosol cloud five km long, two km deep and 100
m
high. One litre of aerosol cloud could contain several hundred units
of
pathogen.
      Such a cloud can sail many dozens of kilometres without losing
its
casualty effects. Consideration of the death rate of biological
agents
during the drift of aerosol particles in the atmosphere makes no
difference
as far as the main conclusion is concerned.  Poison gas tests
according to
regulations in force at Dugway are generally conducted in the morning
to
ensure that enough daylight remains for collecting data on the results
of
tests and cleaning the test site.
      The dissemination of VX on March 13, 1968, is alleged to have
been
carried out one hour before sunset.
      Evening experiments are particularly typical in the case of
biological
agents, for researchers are careful to preclude the disastrous impact
of
sunrays on pathogens.  The year 1968, when the Skull Valley accident
occurred, has gone down in history as the peak of U.S. chemical
warfare in
Vietnam, Laos and Kampuchea.
      In thelate 1960s, the Pentagon worked at a frantic pace to
develop new
chemical and germ weapons.
      A report by the House Committee on Science and Astronautics said
that
in the years preceding the accident, the Pentagon had been engaged in
a vast
programme for germ weapon testing. The tests were conducted at
several
military testing grounds, on ocean islands, in the Panama Canal zone,
Alaska, New York City and San Diego as well as on airfields, in
subways and
on highways. The Dugway test made on March 13, 1968, or somewhat
earlier
could be one of those tests. It is reasonable to suppose that during
that
test use was made of biological agents based on a virus selectively
killing
sheep without doing any harm to humans. It could be visna, a virus
which has
been intensively studied since the late 1950s in several research
centres,
including Fort Dettrick, Maryland, then the main U.S. centre for the
development of germ weapons. No visna-caused diseases have been
recorded
among humans.
      This virus hardly affects cattle, horses or other animals. Its
properties in this respect coincide entirely with those of the agent
responsible for the Skull Valley accident in 1968.
      Visna affects the central nervous system of sheep, robbing their
body
of immunity. The symptoms are progressive weakness, shortness of
breath, a
wobbly gait, sagging withers and a drooping head. The end affect is
paresis
and paralysis of the skeletal muscles and then death. Similar symptoms
were
registered in sheep affected with the Skull Valley disease.
      The disease caused by visna is incurable. This explains why the
epidemiological service of Utah did the right thing by deciding to
slaughter
the diseased sheep.
      No antidotes could have helped the animals in the least and were
not
used, either.  If during the March 1968 tests at Dugway visna was used
as a
simultant modelling the properties of germ weapons, it is clear why
the men
who buried the dead sheep used no gas masks or protective clothes,
since
visna is harmless to man.
      And this invites another conclusion: at that time, the nature of
the
agent which affected the sheep was known to at least a small group of
people
in charge of removing the effects of the accident.
      The establishment of investigation committees was merely
designed to
conceal the real objectives and tasks of the Dugway experiments from
the
public.  The mystery of those criminal experiments has begun to come
to
light in recent years. Competent scientists consider that visna was
used in
the United States for genetic engineering work which resulted in
creating
HIV, a chimeric virus causing an incurable infectious disease of man
known
as AIDS. Research into HIV at the molecular level has shown that 60
per cent
of its genome is identical with that of visna and the rest is a built-
in
nucleotide sequence isolated from the genome of another retrovirus,
HLTV-I.
HIV, or the pathogen of AIDS, was designed in U.S. genetic
engineering
laboratories on instruction from the Pentagon.
      The purpose of this virus is to augment the U.S. germ
(biological)
warfare potential by acquiring a capability for depriving an enemy
population of vitally important immunity at the threshold of a major
or
local armed conflict.  The conclusion about the complicity of the
U.S.
military authorities in the appearance of AIDS, the new dangerous
disease
which affects humans, is shared by John Seale of Britain, Jacob Segal
of
Germany, Robert Strecker of the United States and other noted
scientists and
experts who have carefully analysed available scientific data. [See
New Dawn
Vol.2, No.1]
      For the time being, they have discounted the events and facts
connected with the Skull Valley accident. Nevertheless, they have come
to
the unanimous conclusion that in designing HIV visna was made use of.
Dr.
Seale has said that a scientist who wanted to evolve a virus capable
of
destroying man's immunity system and provoking a disease similar to
AIDS
would have to resort to visna.
      The "patent" for inventing HIV should be issued to the United
States
because it was there that the virus was developed and also because
Americans
were the first victims of AIDS. The disease, which broke out in New
York,
was carried to other big cities in the United States and then to
other
countries and continents. Its virus was transmitted by infected
Americans
serving at overseas military bases.
      Besides, AIDS was contracted in the United States by Australian
and
European tourists vacationing there. HIV spread to Middle East and
other
Arab countries which imported blood from donors stricken with AIDS.
In
October 1986, John Seale quoted during an interview with the Guardian
an
extract from a report prepared by the Pentagon in 1969. It said that
in the
next five to ten years an infective micro-organism might be evolved
that
would differ substantially from all pathogens known so far. Its most
important property, the report said, would consist in attacking the
immune
system and internal organs on which the ability of the human body to
resist
infectious diseases depends. Consequently, the AIDS pathogen was
deliberately created and development was planned and funded.
      The test at Dugway which killed so many sheep in Skull Valley
turned
out to be part of the Pentagon's programme for designing a new
biological
agent, the AIDS pathogen.
      AIDS:  As Biological & Psychological Warfare By WAVES FOREST
      It is hard to imagine that a cure for AIDS would be withheld
for
economic reasons alone. Could there be some other motive?
      Despite repeated denials from Defense Department officials,
allegations persist that AIDS is a genetically altered virus, which
has been
deliberately released to wipe out homosexuals and/or non-whites in the
U.S.
and reduce populations in Third World countries.  At first glance it
seems
like the epitome of paranoia to accuse the military of conspiring to
exterminate citizens of their own country, and even some of their own
troops. However, the vast majority of military personnel could be
completely
unaware of such a plot in their midst, while a relative handful of
traitors
in key positions could conduct it under cover of classified
operations. And
the circumstantial evidence is actually quite compelling, that the
AIDS
virus was artificially engineered, and planted in several different
locations at about the same time through vaccination programs, and
possibly
blood bank contamination.
      At a House Appropriations hearing in 1969, the Defense
Department's
Biological Warfare (BW) division requested funds to develop through
gene-splicing a new disease that would both resist and break down a
victim's
immune system. "Within the next 5 to 10 years it would probably be
possible
to make a new infective micro-organism which would differ in certain
important respects from any known disease-causing organisms.
      Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the
immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to
maintain our
relative freedom from infectious disease." (See A Higher Form of
Killing:
The Secret Story of Chemical and Biological Warfare by R. Harris and
J.
Paxman, p.266, Hill and Wang, pubs.)
      The funds were approved.  AIDS appeared within the requested
time
frame, and has the exact characteristics specified.
      In 1972, the World Health Organisation published a similar
proposal:
      "An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in
fact
exert selective effects on immune function, e.g. by... affecting T
cell
function as opposed to B cell function. The possibility should also
be
looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be
impaired if
the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells
responding to
the viral antigens." (Bulletin of the W.H.O., vol. 47, p.257-274.)
This is a
clinical description of the function of the AIDS virus.   The
incidence of
AIDS infections in Africa coincides exactly with the locations of the
massive W.H.O. smallpox vaccination program in the mid-1970's (London
Times,
May 11, 1987).
      Some 14,000 Haitians then on UN secondment to Central Africa
were also
vaccinated in this campaign.
      Personnel actually conducting the vaccinations may have been
completely unaware that the vaccine was anything other than what they
were
told.  A striking feature of AIDS is that it is ethno-selective.
      The rate of infection is twice as high among Blacks, Latinos
and
Native Americans as among whites, with death coming two to three times
as
swiftly. And over 80% of the children with AIDS and 90% of infants
born with
it are among these minorities. "Ethnic weapons" that would strike
certain
racial groups more heavily than others have been a longstanding U.S.
Army BW
objective. (Harris and Paxman, p.265) Under the current U.S.
administration
biological warfare research spending has increased 500 percent,
primarily in
the area of genetic engineering of new disease organisms.
      The "discovery" of the AIDS virus (HTLV3) was announced by Dr.
Robert
Gallo at the National Cancer Institute, which is on the grounds of
Fort
Detrick, Maryland, a primary U.S. Army biological warfare research
facility.
Actually, the AIDS virus looks and acts much more like a cross between
a
bovine leukemia virus and a sheep visna (brain-rot) virus, cultured in
a
human cell culture, than any virus of the HTLV3 group.  The closest
thing in
this case to a "smoking test tube" so far is the AIDS virus itself.
      If it was possible for such a monstrosity to occur naturally it
would
have done so ages ago and decimated mankind at that time. Some other
life
form would presently be in control of this planet (assuming that is
not
already the case).  The Hepatitis B vaccine study in 1978 appears to
have
been the initial means of planting the infection in New York City. The
test
protocol specified non-monogamous males only, and homosexuals received
a
different vaccine from heterosexuals. At least 25-50% of the first
reported
New York AIDS cases in 1981 had received the Hepatitis B test vaccine
in
1978.
      By 1984, 64% of the vaccine recipients had AIDS, and the figures
on
the current infection rate for the participants of that study are held
by
the U.S. State Department of Justice, and "unavailable."
      The AIDS epidemic emerged full-blown in the three U.S. cities
with
"organised gay communities" before being reported elsewhere, including
Haiti
or Africa, so it is epidemiologically impossible for either of those
countries to be the origin point for the U.S. infections.  Another
indication AIDS had multiple origin points is that the 14-month
doubling
time of the disease cannot nearly account for the current number of
cases if
we assume only a small number of initial infections starting in the
late
1970s.  Before dismissing the possibility that a U.S. Army BW facility
would
participate in genocide, bear in mind that hundreds of top Nazis were
imported into key positions in the U.S. military-intelligence
establishment
following WWII. U.S. military priorities were then reorientated from
defeating Nazis to "defeating" communism at any cost, and
strengthening
military control of economic and foreign policy decisions. (See
Project
Paperclip by Clarence Lasby, Atheneum 214, NY, and Gehlen: Spy of the
Century by E.H. Cookridge, Random House.)
      There's no proof those Nazis ever gave up their longterm goals
of
conquest and genocide, just because they changed countries. Fascism
was and
is an international phenomenon. It's not as if this was a total
reversal of
previous U.S. military policy, however. Hitler claimed to have gotten
his
inspiration for the "final solution" from the extermination of Native
Americans in the U.S. For that matter the first example of germ
warfare in
the U.S. was in 1763 when some of the European colonists gave
friendly
      Indians a number of blankets that had been infected with
smallpox,
causing many deaths.
      One indication of the actual U.S. military priorities regarding
BW was
the importation of the entire Japanese germ warfare unit (#731)
following WW
II. These people killed over 3,000 POWs, including many Americans, in
a
variety of grisly experiments, yet they were granted complete amnesty
and
given American military positions in exchange for sharing their
research
findings with their U.S. Army counterparts.
      Consider also the callous attitude displayed by top military
officials
toward veterans suffering from the after-effects of exposure to Agent
Orange
and radiation from nuclear weapons tests.  In fact, since the end of
WW
      II over 200 experimental BW tests have been conducted on
civilians and
military personnel in the U.S.
      One example was the test spraying from Sept. 20-26, 1950 of
bacillus
globigi and syraceus maracezens over 117 square miles of the San
Francisco
area, causing pneumonia-like infections in many of the residents.
      The family of one elderly man who died in the test sued the
government, but lost. To this day, syraceus is a leading cause of
death
among the elderly in the San Francisco area. Another case was the
joint
Army-CIA BW test in 1955, still classified, in which an undisclosed
bacteria
was released in the Tampa Bay region of Florida, causing a dramatic
increase
in whooping cough infections, including twelve deaths. A third example
was
the July 7-10, 1966 release of bacteria throughout the New York
subway
system, conducted by the U.S. Army' Special Operations Division. Due
to the
vast number of people exposed it would be virtually impossible to
identify,
let alone prove, the specific health problems resulting directly from
this
test.
      Despite the loyalty of the vast majority of U.S. military
personnel
toward their country, there are clearly some military officials who
have
very different intentions, and they occupy high enough positions to
impose
their priorities on military programs and get away with it, so far.
The
first detailed charges regarding AIDS as a BW weapon were published in
the
Patriot newspaper in New Delhi, India, on July 4, 1984. It is hard to
say
where the investigations of this story in the Indian press might have
led,
if they had not been sidetracked by two major domestic disasters
shortly
thereafter: the assassination of Indira Gandhi on Oct. 31 and the
Bhopal
Union Carbide plant "accident" that killed several thousand and
injured over
200,000 on Dec. 3.
      Apparently, homosexuals were an initial target in the U.S.
because
their sexual practices would help in the rapid spread of the disease,
and
because it was correctly assumed that very few non-homosexual citizens
would
pay much attention during the early years of the epidemic.
      Also, the stigma of a "homosexual disease" would interfere with
rational analysis and discussion of AIDS.
      Bear in mind that homosexuals were among the first to be
exterminated
in Nazi Germany, before Jews and other minorities, so fewer citizens
would
object.  The details of precisely how the AIDS virus was synthesized,
mass
cultured, and spread by incorporating it into vaccination programs
are
available but fairly intricate.
      Evil is hard to confront, especially on the preposterous scale
we have
here. If you acknowledge the presence of those who think their only
hope for
survival is to kill off two thirds of all the other kinds, and their
ability
to manage it, you then pretty much have to do something about it.
      Abridged from Now What #1.
      Immunex
      The North American-based Nation of Islam (NOI) led by Minister
Louis
Farrakhan launched an offensive in its battle against the deadly "man-
made"
AIDS virus during its recent Saviours' Day weekend.
      The following report is courtesy of The Final Call.
      From the rostrum of Christ Universal Temple here, the Honorable
Louis
Farrakhan announced that the NOI has acquired exclusive distribution
rights
to the AIDS fighting drug Immunex, an oral alpha-interferon treatment
developed in Kenya.  "I just got a call from our chief of staff 3
minutes
before I came on the rostrum," Minister Farrakhan said, regarding the
confirmation of the Immunex agreement that came from Leonard Muhammad
in
Kenya. "The Nation of Islam is announcing to you that we have the
exclusive
distribution rights of Immunex throughout the United States of
America.  "As
of this day," he continued, "Min. Alim will still teach, but he is now
the
Minister of Health and Human Services for the Nation of Islam." Dr.
Alim
told the cheering audience that the war against AIDS is being won but
total
victory will not come "until we deal with those responsible for making
the
AIDS virus."
      Since the early 1970s under the Nixon administration, he said,
the
official policy of this government has been to commit genocide
against
non-white people around the earth.
      That policy continues under the administration of President
George
Bush, he said.  Dr. Muhammad and former Final Call Editor-in-Chief
Abdul
Wali Muhammad were sent to Kenya by Minister Farrakhan last year on a
fact-finding tour regarding the drug Kemron.  While there, the NOI
representatives learned about Immunex.
      Both drugs have shown remarkable effects in relieving AIDS
symptoms,
but the drugs have received very little media coverage in the U.S.
"We
would like FDA approval," said Min. Farrakhan, "however we can't
wait.
      We will take any risk, bear any burden to free our people of a
man-made disease designed to kill us all.
      "The Minister added that the drug will be offered to all who
need it
"regardless of race, creed or colour."
      Sintesi: da quando R. Gallo (USA) il 23 Apr. 1984 annunciò nella
sua
conferenza stampa, la scoperta del virus HIV e che esso causava
l'aids,
quella "teoria" fu accettata per vera, senza nessun controllo
scientifico.
      L'annuncio fu effettuato senza nessun dibattito e con l'assenza
assoluta di qualsiasi pubblicazione scientifica, che l'importanza
della
scoperta avrebbe dovuto avere.
      Tutta la comunità scientifica accettò per vera la notiza e
senza
nessun controllo, divenne un "Fatto vero".
      Lo stesso giorno venne registrato un brevetto del test
dell'aHIV,
sviluppato proprio dal R. Gallo !
      Dopo 16 anni, ancor oggi, siamo al punto di partenza: la
diagnosi
della non provata infezione da HIV viene testata con un test (Elisa)
ed un
altro di controllo (Western Blot - WB) che rivelerebbero la presenza
di
anticorpi.
      L'affidabilità di questi test avrebbe dovuto essere già 16 anni
fa
valutati molto scrupolosamente, date le pesanti ripercussioni
psicologiche,
sociali, e professionali, che un responso positivo a quei test
comportano
per la persona, per i suoi famigliari ed amici.
      Come abbiamo visto malgrado che quei test non siano affidabili,
perché
presentano molto falsi positivi - stando anche alle fonti ufficiali -
le
autorità e gli "esperti", hanno operato da decenni ed operano tuttora
come
se lo fossero !
            Conclusioni:
                  Le grandi e gravi BUGIE sull'AIDS
                  Tutto quello che la medicina ufficiale afferma
sull'aids è
falso e non sta in piedi.
                  La definizione della parola Aids comporta più di
quaranta
patologie conosciute, (che sono state tolte dall'elenco ufficiale
delle
patologie per inventare l'AIDS) + la sieropositività.
                  Se quest'ultima è assente, le patologie vengono
chiamate
ed affrontate con le terapie convenzionali.
                  I sostenitori della esistenza dello HIV, NON sono
mai
stati capaci di isolare questo "virus". Hanno diffuso fotografie   e
disegni falsi e/o artefatti del cosiddetto ed ipotetico virus HIV.
                  Nessun test è in grado di verificare con certezza
l'aids e
la presenza del cosiddetto virus, dato che non è mai stato isolato;
hanno
definito una certa proteina che essi dicono contenga questo ipotetico
virus
!
                  L'aids si trasmette con il sangue ? non perché nel
sangue
vi è l'ipotetico virus HIV, ma perché il sangue trasfuso (plasma)
stesso, è
sempre immunosoppressivo per il ricevente !
                  Ci dicono che vi sono milioni di africani vittime
dell'
aids ! Gli ammalati occidentali presentano soprattutto pneumocisti,
polmoniti, demenza, sarcoma di Kaposi, quelli africani soprattutto
febbre
prolungata o tosse persistente, diarree e  perdita di peso...tutte
malattie
da sempre presenti nelle nazioni africane, ben prima dell'apparire
dell'
aids, e risultanti  da scarsa igiene e denutrizione...; quindi siamo
certi
che i dati statistici dichiarati, non si possono comparare perché
risultano
completamente differenti clinicamente ed epidemiologicamente. Il
cosiddetto
aids in africa è dovuto soltanto e  come conseguenza della scarsa
alimentazione/nutrizione, scarsa igiene ed infezioni parassitarie !
Nei
paesi africani non sono mai stati fatte campagne di controllo con i
test per
lo HIV, perché costavano troppo ! i dati formulati sono desunti da
"stime";
un medico africano che segnala all'OMS i casi di diarrea (dovuti a
ingestione di acque malsane, cibi avariati, parassitosi ecc.) ed
equamente
distribuiti fra i vari individui della popolazione (maschi e femmine;
i
maggiormente  colpiti sono i giovani plurivaccinati negli anni '70,'80
e
'90...mentre i vecchi ne sono raramente colpiti ! questi malati  sono
immediatamente catalogati sotto la voce Aids...quindi da ciò possiamo
dedurre che i numeri statistici dell'aids-hiv, indicati dalla OMS in
quegli
stati, sono fasulli e non provati...ma servono alle imprese
produttrici  di
test +   farmaci anti "HIV" e AIDS a ricattare con i  numeri e la
paura..gli
altri stati del mondo ed i cittadini stessi !
                  Recenti ricerche effettuate permettono di dimostrare
che
il 99,2 % degli africani, dichiarati malati di aids, NON presenta i
                  classici sintomi dell'aids, compreso il 97 % dei
cosiddetti siero positivi (s+).
                  Il presidente del Sud Africa Thabo Mbeki (Luglio
2000) ha
deciso di nominare una commissione  scientifica di ricerca
indipendente che
dovrebbe fare luce sulle origini dell'aids. In seguito a questa
legittima
decisione di un capo di stato, si è scatenata una campagna mondiale di
forti
pressioni sul governo del Sud Africa, perché NON istituisse quella
commissione scientifica. 5.000, scienziati, medici e  ricercatori
capitanati
dagli esponenti più legati alle multinazionali dei farmaci anti-aids,
hanno
sottoscritto il documento chiamato "appello di Durban" rivolto a
Mbeki
perché rinunci a formare  quella commissione di studio e le
multinazionali
dei farmaci, per evitare che quella commissione inizi i propri lavori,
hanno
proposto di ridurre i costi dei farmaci ad un prezzo politico..perché
se la
bugia sull'HIV=Aids dovesse  crollare,  crollerebbero anche i loro
enormi
guadagni in milioni di $$$$, fraudolentemente guadagnati..!
                  In occidente al contrario, i malati di aids non
risultano
equamente distribuiti nella popolazione (maschi e femmine) perché
sono
principalmente maschi, omosessuali, plurivaccinati, utilizzatori di
droghe e
di farmaci..
                  Tutto ciò,  che i sostenitori della causa HIV=Aids
hanno
affermato, è pieno di contraddizioni, i dati e le statistiche sono
inventate
e senza nessun controllo di veridicità. (es. in africa sono stati
testati i
cosiddetti malati di aids dichiarati tali per via delle loro diarree
e
perdita di peso) - vedi la relazione scientifica del medico sud
africano
dott. Sam Mhlongo - sui test da lui effettuati che hanno dimostrato
come i
supposti s+ non sono risultati s+ ma s-..come mai ??? egli ha potuto
anche
constatare che i certificati del test presentati a Londra da coloro
che
provenivano dall'Uganda erano falsi e comperati/venduti ai poveri neri
dell'
africa....per assicurare loro prestazioni sanitarie sociali
prioritarie...ciò avviene è perché si devono inventare le false
statistiche
per ricattare intere nazioni con la paura dell'aids !
                  Tutti i convegni, conferenze, non hanno portato a
nulla e
ciò fin dal 1982 (anno della "scoperta" dell'aids), in compenso hanno
portato alla sperimentazione di ogni tipo di "farmaco" tossico, sulla
pelle
dei s+ , dichiarati tali dai famosi test dall'esito insicuro e
fuorviante )
ed hanno permesso di far finanziare la ricerca fasulla con milioni di $
$
alla ricerca di questo ipotetico virus HIV senza arrivare mai ad
isolarlo .... Hanno generato una paura molto nella popolazione
mondiale, più
dannosa dell'ipotetico virus e dell'epidemia dell'aids, malattia
esistente
ma che invece è causata da vari co-fattori: endogeni (produzione di
funghi
nell'intestino), ambientali e comportamentali (forti stress,
intossicazioni
da metalli pesanti e /o utilizzo di droghe), vaccinazioni subite e
cure a
base di farmaci, specie antibiotici e psicofarmaci...
                   Tutto ciò è facilmente comprovabile con opportune
indagini di laboratorio e/o con le analisi epidemiologiche, pratiche
che NON
si devono effettuare altrimenti il mito HIV=Aids decade ed il denaro
per la
falsa ricerca ..scompare.. !
                  Tutto ciò è vergognoso e stupido, perché molte
persone
continuano a morire a causa delle cure tossiche che  propinano ad essi
e
dalle quali le industrie chimiche (che smaltiscono in essi prodotti
tossici
pericolosi) e  farmaceutiche (che preparano le capsule/pastiglie,
brevetti e
permessi di vendita)  ricavano enormi profitti..in milioni di $$$
                  E' vergognoso, ma con le nostre tasse purtroppo
contribuiamo a finanziare queste pseudo ricerche fasulle gestite da
questi
cialtroni..che a loro fruttano denaro in decine di bilioni di ($)
dollari..
                  Vi è una specie di "coalizione" molto pericolosa,
fra
industrie, politici, scienziati  e medici, che creano paure
apocalittiche
nel genere umano (generare angoscia e quindi psicodipendenza),
soltanto per
i loro sporchi interessi  di potere e quindi di denaro; della salute
umana
a questi "individui", NON frega proprio nulla, anzi...vogliono, il
potere,
il denaro (accedere a finanziamenti colossali), essere rieletti, non
perdere
il loro posto di lavoro nei laboratori, ospedali,  cliniche...cioè
rimanere
nelle loro ...

 leggi tutto
D' accordo su alcuni punti, ma attenzione, in effetti, ci sono molte
ombre in questa stramaledetta
malttia che mi porto dietro dal 85/86, effettivamente non esistono
retrovirus che causano danni al' organismo umano
l' unico e H.I.V.L. 1/2/3, (Terminologia poi sostituita con H.I.V.-
A.I.D.S.) ed è altrettanto vero che ho visto morire decine
di amici che avevono l' hiv, ma nessuno è moto di AIDS, ma di malatie
opportunistiche.
Allora bisogna almeno ammettere, che sul' aids non c' é un punto di
partenza, è iniziato in modo anomalo,
e ad oggi,  siamo ancora qui a chiederci cosa ci aspetta in futuro.
E in pratica, paghiamo delle cifre enormi ( In farmaci, e altro ) per
poter continuare a soppravvivere, in modo decente,
ma non certo ottimale, considerando tutti gli anni passati e senza
considerare che i farmaci che prendiamo sono molto tossici, e saprai
bene che ogni tanto si finisce in ospedale non per l' HIV, ma per
effetti collaterali dei farmaci che assumiamo. Certamente, saranno
cialtroni, ma io un pensierino continuo a farcelo, non tanto sul
personaggio, ma
sul' anomalia di questa stranissima pandemia, che tale non è e col
dubbio che non ci abbiano detto mai alcune verità.
Mio  personale pensiero, certamente non posso farci nulla, ma per me
le cose non quadrano:   certamente continuerò
a prendere la mia dose di HAART o triplice, a costi spropositati e
potendo solo tenermi il mio  atroce sospetto !!