Patent ID: 12242086

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All references cited herein are incorporated by reference. Unless otherwise stated, all molecular weights are weight average molecular weights as determined by Gas Permeation Chromatography (GPC), and all percentages are percentage by weight.

The term “copolymer” as used herein indicates a polymer composed of two or more different monomer units, including two comonomers, terpolymers, and polymers having 3 or more different monomers. The copolymers may be random or block, may be heterogeneous or homogeneous, and may be synthesized by a batch, semi-batch or continuous process.

As used herein, “Point light source” means any shaped source of electromagnetic radiation in the 4,000-7,700 Angstrom range. This includes, but is not limited to, incandescent, fluorescent, neon, argon and LED light sources.

One of skill in the art would understand that the present application contains a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present disclosure.

Diffusing Cover

The diffusing cover of the invention is a transparent polymer matrix containing one or more types of diffusing particles. The diffusing cover of the invention provides an even spectral transmission over the wavelength range of from 400 to 800 nm. The even spectral transmission may also effectively extend to lower wavelength light, including down to 390 nm, 385 nm, and 375 nm. For example, a 405 peak nm LED source is known to produce light emission down to about 385 nm. Due to the uniform spectral transmission provided, the diffusing cover composition of the invention is useful for two or more different wavelength point light sources, and especially when one light source is in the 375 to 450 nm range, where light transmission for ordinary diffusing covers generally falls off significantly at the shorter wavelengths.

Polymer Matrix Composition

The diffusing cover matrix polymer is a thermoplastic or thermosetting polymeric material, having a light transmission in the range of from 350 to 1000 nm of at least 50%, preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%, and even more preferably greater than 90%, according to ASTM D 1003 standard (this is the light transmission of the polymer with no scattering particle). The matrix may be transparent or translucent. A translucent glazing can help with light scattering, and so is preferred. The translucency can be caused by a physical treatment of the glazing surface, or by the addition of particles, and in particular of particles with a mis-match of refractive index of from 0.01 to 0.25, and more preferably from 0.02 to 0.2, plus or minus.

Useful polymer matrix materials include, but are not limited to, polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate, glycol modified (PETG), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), impact modified PVC, polyesters (PET, PBT, APET, etc.), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN), acrylonitrile-acrylate copolymer, acrylonitrile-methyl methacrylate copolymer, methyl methacrylate-styrene copolymer, methacrylate-butadiene-styrene terpolymer, acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylate (ASA) terpolymer, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) terpolymer, polystyrene (PS), high impact polystyrene (HIPS), polyolefins, impact modified polyolefins, polycyclo-hexylethylene, cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF), PVdF-acrylic copolymers, imidized acrylic polymer, acrylic polymers, impact modified acrylic polymers, etc., or mixtures thereof. Useful thermoset polymer matrices include, but are not limited to silicones and epoxides.

Acrylics, polystyrene, styrene acrylonitrile and polycarbonate are the preferred polymer matrices due to their ease of processing, and commercial availability. In addition, these polymers exhibit excellent thermomechanical strength. While the energy efficiency of an LED is much better than for an incandescent lamp, some of the energy is nevertheless converted into heat.

Acrylic polymers, as used herein, are meant to include polymers, and copolymers having two or more different monomer units that are formed from alkyl methacrylate and alkyl acrylate monomers, and mixtures thereof. The alkyl methacrylate monomer is preferably methyl methacrylate, which may make up from greater than 50 to 100 percent of the monomer mixture. 0 to less than 50 percent of other acrylate and methacrylate monomers or other ethylenically unsaturated monomers, included but not limited to, styrene, alpha methyl styrene, acrylonitrile, and crosslinkers at low levels may also be present in the monomer mixture. Suitable acrylate and methacrylate comonomers include, but are not limited to, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate and ethyl methacrylate, butyl acrylate and butyl methacrylate, iso-octyl methacrylate and iso-octyl acrylate, lauryl acrylate and lauryl methacrylate, stearyl acrylate and stearyl methacrylate, isobornyl acrylate and isobornyl methacrylate, methoxy ethyl acrylate and methoxy methacrylate, 2-ethoxy ethyl acrylate and 2-ethoxy ethyl methacrylate, and dimethylamino ethyl acrylate and dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate monomers. (Meth) acrylic acids such as methacrylic acid and acrylic acid can be useful for the monomer mixture. Most preferably, the acrylic polymer is a copolymer having 70-99.5 weight percent and more preferably 80 to 99 percent of methyl methacrylate units and from 0.5 to 30 weight percent of one or more C1-8straight or branched alkyl acrylate units.

The acrylic polymer can be an alloy with one or more compatible polymers. Preferred alloys are PMMA/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) alloys, and PMMA/polylactic acid (PLA) alloys. The alloy contains 2 to 95 weight percent, preferably 5 to 90 weight percent, more preferably 20-90, and more preferably 51-90 weight percent of the PMMA homopolymer or copolymer, and 5 to 98 weight percent, preferably 10 to 95 weight percent, more preferably 10 to 80 weight, and more preferably 10 to 49 percent of the compatible polymer.

Diffusing Particles

The diffusing particles may be organic, inorganic or a mixture thereof, and may be spherical, near-spherical, or irregular shaped—or mixtures thereof. Particles formed from suspension or emulsion synthesis are relatively spherical. Particles formed from the grinding of cell-cast sheet will be irregular. In one embodiment particles are formed from the grinding of cell-cast sheet and have irregular shapes. The irregular shape can aid in light dispersion. The diffusing particles maintain their shape and resist deformation under normal processing conditions of heat and pressure during incorporation into the polymer matrix and subsequent formation into articles.

The diffusing particles have an average particle size generally in the range of 500 nm to 120 micrometers, and preferably in the range of 1 micrometer to 90 micrometers. The most preferred particle size range is from 1.5 to 5 micrometers for a unimodal distribution. The distribution could also be bimodal or multimodal. One useful bi-modal distribution includes 1 to 20, and preferably 2 to 15 equivalent loading weight percent of small cross-linked diffusing particles having a mean particle size of from 1 to 20 microns, and from 2 to 10 equivalent loading percent by weight of large cross-linked diffusing particles having a mean particle size of from 30 to 80 microns. This bimodal distribution produces a textured surface, in addition to providing good hiding performance, good transmission and good diffusion.

The amount of the diffusing particles in the polymer matrix ranges from 0.1 to 40 weight percent, based on the weight of the total glazing, preferably from 0.2 to 20 percent, and more preferably from 0.2 to 10 percent, and most preferably from 0.3 to 10, and more preferably from 0.4 to 6 weight percent, based on the total polymer matrix composition. The level of total diffusing particles can depend on the average particle size, and also on the thickness of the glazing. The particles preferably do not absorb 350-400 nm light.

The particles have a refractive index that is mismatched to the matrix, having a refractive index that is 0.01 to 0.25 different from that of the matrix polymer, preferably from 0.02 to 0.20. While not being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that diffusion particles with refractive index lower than the polymer matrix are most preferred for maximum spectral uniformity of the light transmitted through a diffusion material. It is believed that diffusion materials containing diffusion particles with refractive index lower than the matrix will incur less Fresnel reflection losses, compared to diffusion materials containing diffusion particles with refractive index higher than the matrix. While not being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that additives or processes that increase the roughness of the diffusing material surface are preferred for maximum spectral uniformity of the light transmitted through a diffusion material. Index of refraction can be measured by methods well known in the art such as in conformance with ASTM D 542. Since different sized particles diffuse light most efficiently at specific wavelengths, in order to provide good diffusing over the range from 400 nm to 800 nm of light two or more different average particle size distributions are preferably used- or else a single average particle size with a very, very wide distribution of particle. Smaller size diffusing particle may be better at diffusing shorter wavelength light, and larger average particle size particles may be better at diffusing longer wavelength light.

Examples of useful particles include inorganic particles such as BaSO4, TiO2, CaCO3,

BaTiO3, fluoropolymer particles such as poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE), poly(chlorotrifluoroethylene) (PCTFE), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), and copolymers thereof; hydrophobic polymers such as polyalkyl oxides; polystyrene; silicones including but not limited to silicone rubbers, oligosiloxane-type cage link structures and silicone resins; core/shell polymer particles; cross-linked acrylic beads, preferably made by a suspension process having a composition of 0-99.99% styrene, 0-99.99% alkyl methacrylate or alkyl acrylate, or a mixture of both, and 0.01-5% crosslinking agent.

In one embodiment, cross-linked methyl methacrylate particles are used. These comprise greater than 50 weight percent, preferably greater than 70 weight percent, and more preferably greater than 80 weight percent methyl methacrylate units and 0.5 to 20 percent, preferably 1 to 10 percent, of a monomer possessing at least two C═C double bonds acting as crosslinking agent. This may for example be 1,4-butanediol di(meth)acrylate, ethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, tetraethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, propylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, allyl methacrylate or divinylbenzene. In another embodiment, acrylic copolymers containing a majority of butyl acrylate are used.

In another embodiment, the particles have a core-shell structure with rubbery alkyl acrylate

polymers in the core and at least one polymer shell, which is compatible to the polymer matrix. This outer shell represents only a fraction of the total particle weight. The rubbery core typically comprises an alkyl acrylate polymer having a refractive index that differs by at least 0.02 or more units from that of the matrix polymer.

In a preferred embodiment, some or all of the diffusing particles are silicon-both silicon rubber and silicone resin particles. Silicon particles useful in the invention may be obtained in several ways, including: A: Hydrolysis and polycondensation of organotrialkoxysilanes and/or tetraalkoxysilanes, these being described by the formulae R1Si(OR2)3and Si(OR2)4, where R′ is, by way of example, a substituted or unsubstituted alkyl group, an alkenyl group or a phenyl group, and the radical R of the hydrolysable alkoxy group is an alkyl group, such as methyl, ethyl or butyl, or an alkoxy-substituted hydrocarbon group, e.g. 2-methoxyethyl or 3-ethoxyethyl. Examples of organotrialkoxysilanes are methyltrimethoxysilane, methyltriethoxysilane, methyl-n-propoxysilane, methyltriisopropoxysilane and methyltrls (2-methoxyethoxy) silane. These silane compounds, and processes for the production of spherical silicone particles therefrom, are known to the person skilled in the art and can be found in the specifications EP 1 116 741, JP 63-077940 and JP 2000-186148. B: Chemical crosslinking of polysiloxane chains having inorganic silicone-oxygen backbone and organic side chains amenable to chemical crosslinking, such as olefinic groups. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,039 demonstrates such a process.

The silicon-containing diffusing particles may be used as the sole diffusing particles, or can be combined with other types of organic and/or inorganic particles. In the examples that follow, the silicon particles show similar performance when combined with large organic particles.

Other Additives

The polymer matrix composition may contain other additives, including impact modifiers, and other additives typically present in polymer formulations, including but not limited to, stabilizers, plasticizers, fillers, coloring agents, pigments, dyes, antioxidants, antistatic agents, surfactants, toner, refractive index matching additives, additives with specific light diffraction.

Useful impact modifiers include block copolymers, graft copolymers, and core/shell impact modifiers. The impact modifier may be present at a level of from 0 to 80 weight percent, preferably 5 to 60, and more preferably from 10 to 45 weight percent, based on the total layer amount of matrix polymer and all additives. The level of impact modifier can be adjusted to meet the toughness needs for the end use of the composition. Core-shell impact modifiers are multi-stage, sequentially-produced polymer having a core/shell particle structure of at least two layers. Preferentially, the core-shell modifier comprises three layers made of a hard core layer, one or more intermediate elastomeric layers, and a hard shell layer.

In one embodiment, the impact modifier comprises a core made of acrylate/polysiloxane copolymer and a shell made of hard resin. In this case, the core is a material of flexible rubber type prepared by polymerization of one or more vinyl monomers in the presence of a polymer of rubber type obtained from monomers such as alkyl acrylates or alkyl methacrylates, in which the alkyl group comprises from 2 to 10 carbon atoms. Products of this type are sold by Mitsubishi Rayon under the reference Metablen® S-2001.

According to another embodiment, the impact modifier is composed of a poly(organosiloxane) core and of a shell of thermoplastic resin. The organic groups of the poly(organosiloxane) cores are preferably alkyl or vinyl radicals comprising between 1 and 18 carbons, advantageously between 1 and 6 carbons, or aryl radicals or hydrocarbons which are substituted. The poly(organosiloxane) comprises one or more of these groups. The siloxanes have a variable degree of functionalization which defines the degree of crosslinking of the poly(organosiloxane). Preferably, the mean degree of functionalization is between 2 and 3, thus forming a partially crosslinked core. The shell is formed of polymers or copolymers resulting from monomers such as alkyl acrylates or methacrylates, acrylonitrile, styrene, vinylstyrene, vinyl propionate, maleimide, vinyl chloride, ethylene, butadiene, isoprene and chloroprene. The fraction of the core represents between 0.05 and 90% by weight of the particles, preferably between 60 and 80% by weight. The size of the particles is between 10 and 400 nm. Mention may be made, as example of impact modifier of this type, of the products of the Genioperl®) range from Wacker Silicones.

In one embodiment, the impact modifier is a high efficiency impact modifier, as described in WO 2020/198,179, having 0.5 to 40 weight percent, of a hard core polymeric stage with a Tg>0° C., 10 to 80 weight percent, of an inner polymeric shell with a Tg<0° C., 5-50 weight percent, of an outer polymeric shell with a Tg>0° C., wherein the ratio of emulsifier to surface area of said core-shell particle is less than 1.5×10−4g/m2.

Light Stabilizing and/or UV absorbing additives may be added to the polymer matrix composition, though any such light stabilizing or UV absorbing additive should not interfere with 400 nm light transmission. UV light stabilizers include both UV absorbers and antioxidants. The specific selection of a UV absorber and the loading level can control the Δ% LT. Lower loading of light stabilizing or UV absorbing additives and the choice of such additive(s) that only absorb at lower wavelengths (such as 250-360 nm) should be used in the composition of the invention. Some typical UV absorbers, such as Methyl Salicylate (MESAL) absorbs slightly up to 390 nm. Useful UV absorbers that absorb UVB and UVC light (200-320 nm light) include but are not limited to, phenolic aldehydes (e.g. Methyl Salicylate or N-(2-Ethoxyphenyl)-N′-(2-ethylphenyl) oxamide) and/or dimethyl (P-methoxybenzylidene) malonate (e.g. Hostavin PR-25). Useful light stabilizing additives include but are not limited to Hindered Amine light stabilizers (e.g. Tinuvin 770), and may provide an additional radical scavenging and/or antioxidant effect.

Some commercial light stabilization additives (e.g. Tinuvin® P) exhibit minor absorbance in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum (>380 nm). If such additives are included in a light diffusing acrylic resin, spectral uniformity may diminish (increase ΔLT (800-400 nm)). It is known to those skilled in the art that alternative commercially available light stabilization additives (e.g. Tinuvin® 312) do not exhibit absorbance in the visible region (>380 nm), and are therefore preferred in a light diffusing acrylic formulation to improve spectral uniformity (decrease ΔLT (800-400 nm)). For example, Examples 10 and 14-18 show that judicious selection of UV absorber and UV absorber concentration may improve spectral uniformity.

Blending Procedure

The diffusing cover of the invention may be blended and formed by any process known in the art for forming a cover, including but not limited to melt compounding and melt processing, such as extrusion, blow molding, injection molding, etc. or in a cast polymerization process.

The diffusing cover of the invention is at least 200 micrometers in thickness, with no limitation on the maximum thickness—other than the increase in cost and weight. A preferred thickness is from 250 microns to 10 mm, and more preferably from 300 micrometers to 5 mm in thickness.

Coating

In one embodiment, the diffusing cover of the invention may be coated, to provide added properties to the cover, such as dirt shedding and weathering. Useful dirt shedding coatings may include fluoropolymers, including polyvinylidene fluoride polymers and copolymers having at least 60 weight percent of polyvinylidene fluoride monomer units; silicon coatings, cross-linked acrylic coatings, and other coating known in the art for improving dirt shedding and weathering properties. The coating should not generally interfere with the transmission of light in the 400 nm-800 nm range. The coating may be added by a coating process, a coextrusion process, a lamination process, or other processes known in the art.

Light Sources

The light diffusing cover of the invention is especially useful when used in a lighting device having more than one, point light source. Multi-spectral LED devices or luminaires are devices that contain at least one LED with peak spectral emission in the visible light spectrum (400-800 nm) and at least one additional LED with different peak spectral transmission in the range 250-800 nm. Examples include:1: Continuous Environmental Disinfecting Luminaires. Luminaires such as the CM2084-D-JASPER™ by Visa Lighting contain multiple LEDs with different peak emission in order to selectively disinfect a surface, and or provide light to humans. In this case, LEDs with peak emission at 405 nm may be activated to disinfect a surface while LEDs with peak emission at 500-700 provide soft-white light for visibility.2: Multi-color Luminaires. Commercial products and smart lighting, such as light strips from Philips include multiple LEDs enchased within a diffusing housing in order to provide color-tuneability to the user.3: Horticultural Lighting. Some crop growers use multi-spectral LED luminaires to influence crop development and health. For example, LEDs with peak spectral emission above 700 nm have been shown to influence phototropism in plants, while LEDs with peak spectral emission below 400 nm have been used to promote production of plant flavonoids and phenyl propanoids. Commercial luminaires contain 4-10 LED types with different spectral emission peak.

For multi-spectral luminaire applications that wholly or partially involve human exposure, it is preferable that the LED light engine is placed behind a diffusing material in order to reduce glare. It is also preferable that the diffusing material uniformly transmit light across the entire visible spectrum in order to maximize light transmission from each LED through the diffusing material.4. Interior automotive lighting having various color LEDs. One application is for the interior of autonomous vehicles.

EXAMPLES

Refractive Index (R.I.) measured by ASTM D 542 (Na-D line@ 23° C.

Number average particle diameter: measured by Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis using a Malvern Multisizer II (Electrical Sensing Zone Method, reporting mean particle size.

Hiding Performance

The hiding performance (HP) of the LED cover of the invention can be determined by a test comprising the steps of:a) forming plaque of the material to be tested at uniform thickness—for example 0.080 inch thickness;b) measuring the optical transmission of the sample on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 at 0 inches from the integrating sphere, and 400 nm, 500 nm, 600 nm, 700 nm, and 800 nm light;c) measuring the optical transmission of the sample on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 at 2 inches from the integrating sphere, and 400 nm, 500 nm, 600 nm, 700 nm, and 800 nm light;d) calculating the percent hiding performance as a percentage, as the difference between the two transmission measurements (0 inch and 2 inch), divided by the 0 inch transmission measurement, times 100 to obtain a percent hiding performance each of 400 nm, 500 nm, 600 nm, 700 nm, and 800 nm light.

Hiding performance is somewhat related to haze, yet for many samples haze does not correlate well to hiding performance. In general, the lighting industry relies on qualitative tests that vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, such as by ASTM D 1003. In a commercial extruded lens or cover (2 mm thickness) the hiding performance should be greater than 40% and preferably greater than 50%, and not more than 95%. Below 30% light is not efficiently diffused at a reasonable distance (2 inch). Above 95% and the percent transmission of the lens is compromised, lowering the light output. In the thinner lens 0.9 mm (injection molded) the hiding performance should also be greater than 40%

It has been found that the transmission curves are a function of the distance from the integrating sphere on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950. Yet the change in the light transmission as a result of the distance from the integrating sphere is not constant for different materials. Calculation of hiding performance is found to be a function of distance from integrating sphere.

Test: First a 2 inch by 2 inch square, 0.080 in thickness is extruded for each composition. The sample is placed in a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 at 0 inches from the integrating sphere, and the transmission at 400 nm, 500 nm, 600 nm, 70 nm, and 800 nm light is measured. The sample is then moved to 2 inches from the integrating sphere, and the transmission at 400 nm, 500 nm, 600 nm, 70 nm, and 800 nm light is again measured. The hiding performance is then calculated as the difference between the two transmission measurements (0 inch and 2 inch), divided by the 0 inch transmission measurement, times 100 to obtain a percent hiding performance at each wavelength.

Example Formulations

Diffusion material samples were obtained by melt compounding the components described in Table 2, followed by sheet extrusion of 0.080″ thick sample plaques. The compounding die temperature was controlled at 200-220° C. using a Leistritz 27 mm twin screw extruder under vacuum at the line speed of 50 lbs/hr under the screw speed of 250-350 rpm. Optical Characterization was performed on a Lambda 950 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer. Light transmission (% LT) and Hiding Performance (HP) were calculated according to methods described above. Examples 1-13 are extruded and may exhibit some texturing due to the particles, while Examples 14-18 are injection molded in a highly polished mold.

Resin A is poly(methyl-methacrylate)/ethyl acrylate copolymer, MFR 2.3 g/10 min (measured by ASTM D1238, 230° C./3.8 kg) and refractive index 1.489 (measured according to ASTM D 542). Resin A does not contain UV absorbing additives. Table 1 summarizes the diffusing particle characteristics.

TABLE 1Diffusion particles used in examples. Refractiveindices measured according to ASTM D 542Number AverageRefractiveIDDescriptionDiameter (μm)IndexParticle AAcrylic and Styrenic bead50.01.515Particle BAcrylic and Styrenic bead5.01.555Particle CSilicone bead A2.01.39Particle DSilicone bead B2.21.42

TABLE 2Example formulations expressed in weight percent.Resin AParticle AParticle BParticle CParticle DExample 182.0%18.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%Example 299.5%0.0%0.5%0.0%0.0%Example 399.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%Example 499.4%0.0%0.0%0.6%0.0%Example 599.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.6%Example 699.0%0.0%1.0%0.0%0.0%Example 798.5%0.0%1.5%0.0%0.0%

TABLE 3400 nm800 nmΔ% LTExample ID% LTHP% LTHP(800 nm − 400 nm)Example 182.288%89.577%7.3Example 284.280%90.266%6.0Example 381.891%85.885%4.0Example 469.593%75.089%5.6Example 574.992%79.089%4.1Example 673.690%85.782%12.1Example 764.293%79.788%15.5Summarized optical light transmission (% LT), hiding performance (HP), and spectral uniformity (Δ% LT) of 0.080″ thick example plaques, measured on a Lambda 950 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer.

Examples 1-7

This example compares acrylic light diffusion materials containing silicone-diffusion particles with commercial acrylic light diffusion materials containing organic diffusion particles. The silicon-containing diffusing particles were found to provide more uniform spectral transmission at equal or better hiding performance.

The percent light transmission (% LT), and or hiding performance vs. wavelength are shown for different levels of diffusing particles inFIGS.1-4.

Spectral uniformity is defined as the difference % LT (800 nm)-% LT (400 nm).

The spectral uniformity for each sample is listed in Table 3. Only acrylic resins containing silicone resin (Particle D) or silicone rubber (Particle C) diffusion particles demonstrate spectral uniformity of less than 6%. It is anticipated that a person skilled in the art may achieve spectral uniformity with less than 6% using an exceedingly small concentration of any diffusion particles, however the hiding performance will be very low. Both Particle C and Particle D have refractive index lower than the Resin A matrix. When considering the light transmission through a diffusing material, it is believed that a diffusing material containing diffusion particles with refractive index lower than the refractive index of the matrix is best for promoting uniform spectral transmission.

FIG.1compares acrylic resin containing Particle D to Particle B. At 800 nm, the light transmission for 0.6% and 0.3% Particle D is equivalent to 1% and 1.5% Particle B, respectively. At 400 nm, the light transmission for 0.6% and 0.3% Particle D is up to 10% greater than 1% and 1.5% Particle B, respectively. Accordingly, compositions containing Particle D demonstrate greater spectral uniformity and provide equal or better hiding performance (FIG.2).

Table 3 shows diffusion resins containing Particle D also demonstrate better spectral uniformity than diffusion resins containing Particle A (FIG.3). While both resins have the same % LT at 400 nm. The diffusion resins containing Particle A demonstrates poor spectral uniformity compared to the acrylic resin containing Particle D. Additionally, the acrylic resin containing Particle D demonstrates significantly greater hiding performance compared to the diffusion resin containing Particle A (FIG.4).

Diffusion resins containing Particle C and D maintained spectral uniformity less than 6% while also demonstrating high light transmission and hiding performance greater than or equal to 85% (Examples 3, 4, and 5). Diffusion resins containing Particle B demonstrated spectral uniformity greater than or equal to 6% and hiding performance greater than or equal to 66%. A diffusion resin containing Particle A demonstrated spectral uniformity greater than or equal to 6% and hiding performance 77%. In the case of Particle A, the large size of the particle created a rough surface texture that contributed to increasing the hiding performance.

Examples 8-18

Resin B is the same as Resin A except it does contain a very low level of UV absorbing additive. Resin C is an impact modified acrylic resin that contains UV absorbing additive and has a MFR of 1 g/10 min (measured by ASTM D1238, 230° C./3.8 kg). Resin D is the same as Resin C except it does not contain UV stabilizers.

TABLE 4Example formulations expressed in weight percent.Example IDResin BResin CParticle AParticle BParticle CExample 898.0%1.8%0.2%Example 994.2%5.0%0.8%Example 1082.0%18.0%Example 1191.0%9.0%Example 1295.5%4.5%Example 1379.6%18.0%2.4%

TABLE 5385 nm400 nm800 nmΔ% LTΔ% LTExample ID% LTHP% LTHP% LTHP(800 nm-400 nm)(800 nm-385 nm)Example 877.286.884.686.685.777.21.18.5Example 967.787.577.487.187.578.310.219.8Example 1035.682.279.282.089.674.610.454.0Example 1137.266.885.866.192.054.66.254.8Example 1236.747.987.047.192.035.55.055.3Example 1336.195.446.795.449.595.22.713.4Summarized optical light transmission (% LT), hiding performance (HP), and spectral uniformity (Δ% LT) of 0.080″ thick example plaques, measured on a Lambda 950 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer.

TABLE 6Additional Example formulations expressed in weight percent.Example IDResin BResin CResin DParticle AParticle BParticle CCommentsExample 1082.0%18.0%high % stabilizer #1Example 1482.0%18.0%no UV stabilizerExample 1582.0%18.0%low % stabilizer #2Example 1681.9%18.0%high % stabilizer #2Example 1781.9%18.0%low % stabilizer #3Example 1880.8%18.0%high % stabilizer #3

TABLE 7385 nm400 nm800 nmΔ% LTΔ% LTExample ID% LTHP% LTHP% LTHP(800 nm-400 nm)(800 nm-385 nm)Example 1035.682.279.282.089.674.610.454.0Example 1486.467.188.165.391.345.33.24.9Example 1586.969.188.567.691.047.12.54.1Example 1687.268.088.766.190.745.72.03.5Example 1787.068.888.967.091.847.22.94.8Example 1886.766.988.765.091.545.42.84.8Summarized optical light transmission (% LT), hiding performance (HP), and spectral uniformity (Δ% LT) of 0.080″ thick example plaques, measured on a Lambda 950 UV/VIS Spectrophotometer.