Patent ID: 12211992

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This invention provides positive electrodes for rechargeable lithium ion batteries, which can maintain a low internal resistance, high capacity and a good stability during cycling and storage of the batteries at both room and elevated working temperatures. The key factor to obtain such desirable properties in this invention is the use of suitable additives in the electrode composition, by incorporating the additives in the positive electrode slurry. Such a slurry normally contains a binder, such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), a solvent, such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), and an additive for improving the conductivity, such as carbon black. In the invention, extra additives are used. They are lithium heavy metal oxides with the general formula LixHmM′yOzand more specifically having the following formulae: LixWMyOz, where M stands for metal elements with valence states +2 or +3, and with 0<y≤1, 3≤x≤4, 5≤z≤6, whereby x=(2*z)−[y*(valence state of M)]−(valence state of W). In an embodiment, the lithium heavy metal has the formula Li4MgWO6or Li4NiWO6, where M′ has a valence state of 2+.

This invention observes that when a lithium heavy metal oxide is added to the slurry of the positive electrode during full cell preparation, the obtained cells present a much better resistance property, which means they have both a low initial resistance and a low resistance growth during cycling and storage. In the Examples, Li4MgWO6or Li4NiWO6serve as additives in the positive electrode. Cells with these electrodes are compared with full cells without the additives in the electrode, in cycling tests at room and elevated temperature, as well as in High Temperature-storage tests at 60° C.

Automotive batteries are expensive and therefore they are supposed to last for many years. Severe requirements have to be met by the cathode materials. Here we will summarize these requirements as “battery life” requirements, since battery life is not one simple property. In real life batteries are stored at different states of charge (during driving or during parking), and during driving, they are charged and discharged at different temperatures as well as different voltages. For development purposes it is impossible to test cells for many years under realistic conditions. To speed up the tests “accelerated life” tests are applied, which investigate different mechanisms that contribute to a limited shelf-life.

Batteries are for example tested at constant charging and discharging rate, to measure the “cycle stability”. Cycle stability can be tested under different voltage ranges, temperatures and current rates. Under these different conditions different mechanisms which cause a capacity loss can be observed. For example, slow cycling at high T mostly expresses the chemical stability, while fast cycling at low temperature shows dynamic aspects. The cycle stability results for cathodes in real full cells-made according to the invention—are reported furtheron. The tests are performed at a voltage range of 2.7-4.2V, at a temperature of 25 and 45° C. and at a 1C charge-1C discharge rate. As the batteries might operate at higher temperatures, the requirements for high T cycling stability are stricter. An automotive battery contains many cells, controlled by a battery management system. To lower the system cost a more simple battery management system is desired. One contribution to the cost is the heating/cooling system which ensures that the cells operate at the appropriate temperature. At low temperatures the battery has insufficient power, whereas at high temperature the cycle stability becomes a concern. Obviously the system cost can be reduced if the automotive cathode materials support stable cycling not only at 25° C. but also at higher temperatures.

Storage tests investigate the capacity loss after extended storage (by measuring the remaining or retained capacity), and also the recovered capacity measured after recharging. Additionally, the resistance is measured and compared to the initial value. The increase of the resistance is an important result of cell damage during storage, since it directly influences power capabilities. DCR measurements are also a very sensitive tool to detect (and extrapolate) to what degree undesired side reactions have happened (or will happen) in the cell during storage. To accelerate the tests, the storage is done at high voltage (where the cell is initially fully charged at 4.35V) and at an elevated temperature of 60° C., which accelerates the undesired side reactions. However, the testing of capacities and DCR after storage is typically done at room temperature. The results of the storage tests are reported furtheron, showing recovered capacity and retention capacity, measured at 25° C.—after storage at 60° C. DCR measurement results after storage are also reported, and graphs will show the relative value compared to the DCR measurements before storage.

The results prove the benefits of the additives, which reduce resistance growth and improve cyclability and storage stability. Additionally, an electrochemical test of the cells during the formation step gives the initial capacity and energy performance of the cells, which shows that the cells with the additives maintain a capacity close to the reference cell that has no additives according to the invention. Thus, the additives do not degrade the capacity performance of a full cell. The mechanism of reducing the initial DCR and the DCR growth during cycling by the claimed additives is supposed to relate to the Solid-Electrolyte Interface (SEI) formation. Surprisingly, it is observed that the additives remain in the positive electrode after a full cell cycling test, and that the high valence metal partially dissolves. This phenomenon may suggest a “dissolution—re-precipitation” process occurring during cycling. Such process may tend to create the desired surface that helps to reduce the interfacial resistance. The high valence state as well as the dissolution can be supported by having a large lithium content in the phase.

In the current invention, it is also discovered that the additives containing a low valence state metal can further enhance the positive effects of reducing resistance growth and improving cycle life. In the tests below, one full cell contains the additive Li4MgWO6, another full cell contains Li4NiWO6, and a third cell contains Li4WO5. In the aspect of cycle life and resistance increase, both Li4MgWO6and Li4NiWO6containing cells are more advanced than the Li4WO5containing cell. Thus, it is preferred to choose lithium heavy metal oxide additives containing additionally a low valence state metal.

The additive particles according to this invention can be dispersed as a separate phase in the positive electrode. It should be noted that these additive particles are not thermodynamically stable, and can be easily decomposed under high temperature treatment. The additive materials of the present invention may be prepared by a solid-state reaction. In one embodiment, the method is a simple solid state reaction using a M′ precursor (such as MgO, NiO, Ni(OH)2etc., a lithium precursor (typically Li2CO3) and a Hm precursor (oxides such as WO3, Nb2O5). Stoichiometric amounts of the M′, Hm and 2% excess Li precursor (above the stoichiometric amount) are mixed and then fired in an oxygen containing atmosphere such as air. The excess Li is useful since there are potentially Li losses during the preparation at high temperature. The sintering temperature should be high enough to allow for a complete reaction and the formation of crystallites, but not too high to avoid excessive sintering. A preferred temperature range is between 500° C. and 1100° C. In one embodiment, the temperature range is 900° C.-1100° C. for Ni containing material and 600° C.-800° C. for Mg containing material. The obtained materials are dispersed into acetone and ball-milled for 24 hours, and then dried overnight in an oven. In one embodiment, sub-micron sized secondary particles are desirable for dispersion in the slurry. The sub-micron size may help to achieve a good distribution of secondary particles in the slurry and further increase the contact between additive particles and active cathode material particles, which is believed to be beneficial to reduce the growth of interfacial resistance at positive electrode during cycling of batteries.

The active material of the positive electrode according to the invention can be a layered lithium metal oxide with the O3 structure, having the general formula Lix(M1-yM′y)2-xO2, where x=0.9-1.1, 0≤y≤0.1, wherein M is either one or more of Mn, Co and Ni; and M′ is either one or more of Mg, Al and Ti. In an embodiment, the active material is Lia[Ni0.34Mn0.33Co0.33]2-aO2powder, with a=1.06 to 1.09. Other types of active material are Li1.08M0.92O2, with M=Ni0.38Mn0.29Co0.33O2; Li1.03M0.97O2, with M=Ni0.50Mn0.30Co0.02O2and Li1.01Mo0.99O2, with M=Ni0.60Mn0.02Co0.20O2

The electrode slurry containing the active material and the additives according to the invention further contains a solvent, binder and conductive additive and may be prepared using conventional means such as discussed by Liu et al. in “An effective mixing for lithium ion battery slurries”, Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2014, 4, 515-528. The slurry is coated on a current collector by known methods. It follows that the positive electrode in this invention comprises (after evaporation of the solvent):

active material with the formula Lix(N1-yN′y)2-xO2, where x=0.9−1.1, 0≤y≤0.01 wherein N is either one or more of Mn, Co and Ni; and N′ is either one or more of Mg, Al and Ti;

0.5-5 wt %, and preferably 1-2 wt % of additive having the formula LixHmM′yO2, as described before;

5-7 wt % of carbon, which is typically conductive carbon black;

10 wt % of fluorinated polymer, which is typically PVDF;

a current collector, which is generally an Al foil.

The wt % are expressed versus the total weight of material coated on the current collector. This positive electrode can be used in rechargeable lithium ion batteries that benefit from both a low initial resistance and a low resistance growth during cycling, as well as from a high capacity and long cycle life.

The following description details the methods for shaping the full cells and analyzing them in the Examples:

A) Full Cell Making

650 mAh pouch-type cells are prepared by the following two steps: I. Slurry making and coating and II. Full cell assembly.

I. Slurry Making and Coating

A slurry is prepared by mixing 700 g of a mass production Li1.09[Ni0.34Mn0.33Co0.33]0.91O2(D50=7 μm) powder (from Umicore Korea) with NMP, 47.19 g of super P® (conductive carbon black of Timcal) and 393.26 g of 10 wt % PVDF based binder in NMP solution. The mixture is mixed for 2.5 hrs in a planetary mixer. During mixing additional NMP is added, as well as 1 wt % of additives according to this invention. The mixture is transferred to a Disper mixer and mixed for 1.5 hrs under further NMP addition. A typical total amount of NMP used is about 425 g. The final solid content in the slurry is about 65 wt %. The slurry is transferred to a coating line, where electrodes coated on both sides of the current collector are prepared. The electrode surface is smooth. The electrode loading is 9.6 mg/cm2. The electrodes are compacted by a roll press to achieve an electrode density of about 3.2 g/cm3. The electrodes are used to prepare pouch cell type full cells as described hereafter.

II. Full Cell Assembly

For full cell testing purposes, the prepared positive electrode (cathode) is assembled with a negative electrode (anode) which is typically a graphite type carbon, and a porous electrically insulating membrane (as separator). The full cell is prepared by the following major steps:a) Electrode slitting: after NMP coating the electrode active material might be slit by a slitting machine. The width and length of the electrode are determined according to the battery application;b) Attaching the tabs: there are two kinds of tabs. Aluminum tabs are attached to the positive electrode (cathode), and copper tabs are attached to the negative electrode (anode);c) Electrode drying: the prepared positive electrode (cathode) and negative electrode (anode) are dried at 85° C. to 120° C. for 8 hrs in a vacuum oven;d) Jellyroll winding: after drying the electrode a jellyroll is made using a winding machine. A jellyroll consists of at least a negative electrode (anode) a porous electrically insulating membrane (separator) and a positive electrode (cathode);e) Packaging: the prepared jellyroll is incorporated in a 650 mAh cell with an aluminum laminate film package, resulting in a pouch cell. Further, the non-aqueous electrolyte solution is impregnated for 8 hrs at room temperature. The battery is pre-charged at 15% of its theoretical capacity and aged 1 day, also at room temperature. The battery is then degassed using a pressure of −760 mm Hg for 30 seconds, and the aluminum pouch is sealed.f) Formation: The sealed battery is prepared for use as follows: the battery is charged using a current of 0.25C (with 1C =650 mA) in CC/CV mode (constant current/constant voltage) up to 4.2V with the end condition of cut-off current of C/20. Then the battery is discharged in CC mode at 0.5C rate down to a cut-off voltage of 2.7V. Finally, the battery is charged back to 4.2V under a C-rate of 0.5C in CC/CV mode. After the formation step, the full cell with SOC (state of charge) of 100% is considered to be a “fresh cell”, ready for the “Full cell cycling test” herebelow.g) Aging: Full cells after formation step are stored in room temperature for seven days, which is generally called “aging step”.h) Final charge: Then, aged full cells are treated with a “final charge” process as follows: the battery is discharged using a current of 0.5C (with 1C=650 mA) in CC mode to 2.7V and then is charged in CC/CV mode at 1C rate to a cut-off voltage of 4.2V with end condition of 0.05C. The battery is further discharged down to 2.7V under a C-rate of 0.2C in CC mode and finally is charged in CC/CV mode at 1C rate for around 40 mins in order to get a SOC (state of charge) of 50%. The battery after final charge step is ready for the “Full cell HT-storage test” herebelow.
B) Full Cell Cycling Test

The lithium secondary full cell batteries after “formation” step (f)) are charged and discharged several times under the following conditions, both at 25° C. and 45° C., to determine their charge-discharge cycle performance:The charge is performed in CC mode under 1C rate up to 4.2V, then CV mode until C/20 is reached,The cell is then set to rest for 10 min,The discharge is done in CC mode at 1C rate down to 2.7V,The cell is then set to rest for 10 min,The charge-discharge cycles proceed until the battery reaches 80% retained capacity. Every 100 cycles, the discharge is done at 0.2C rate in CC mode down to 2.7V. The retained capacity at the nth cycle is calculated as the ratio of the discharge capacity obtained at cycle n to cycle 1.

This test is typical for automotive applications, where the batteries might operate at higher temperatures, so requirements for high T cycling stability are stricter.

C) Full Cell DCR Test

The DC resistance is obtained from the voltage response to current pulses, the procedure used is according to USABC standard (United States Advanced Battery Consortium LLC). The DC resistance is very relevant for practical application because data can be used to extrapolate fade rates into the future to prognoses battery live, moreover the DC resistance is very sensitive to detect damage to the electrodes, because reaction products of the reaction between electrolyte and anode or cathode precipitate as low conductive surface layers. A DCR test does not yield a single value, but its value is a function of the battery's state of charge (SOC). For NMC cathodes, the DCR increases at a low state of charge whereas it is flat or shows a minimum value at a high state of charge. A high state of charge refers to a charged battery, a low state of charge is a discharged battery. The DCR strongly depends on temperature. Especially at low temperature the cathode contribution to the DCR of the cell becomes dominating, hence low T measurements are quite selective to observe improvements of DCR that are directly attributable to the behaviour of the cathode materials. In the examples, DCR results of cathodes of real full cells using materials according to the invention are reported. Typically the SOC is varied from 20 to 90%, and the tests are performed at representative temperatures of 25° C. and −10° C.

D) Full Cell HT-Storage Test

To test and monitor the stability of NMC-based cathode material at high temperature, it is typical to use the method of charge-discharge cycling, and storing batteries at high temperature. When they are used, it is common that batteries are exposed to a high temperature environment for a period, so it is important to check the stability of batteries working and being stored at high temperature. In a storage test, the cells are firstly charged to a high cut-off voltage, and then stored at a high temperature like 60° C. During storage at high temperature, similar parasite reactions take place as in a cycling test at high voltage. With the cut-off voltage increasing, the side reactions accelerate and result in a fast self-discharge of the cells. This phenomenon can be observed from the voltage drop during storage and the retained capacity measured after storage. In a storage test, cells are normally treated with one cycle of charge/discharge before and after a period of storage, in order to check the stability of the cells through capacity fading. Retained capacity and recovered capacity are two parameters to evaluate the stability of the cells, which are calculated from the charge and discharge capacity after storage. Currently, the recovered capacity tends to be considered as the only standard property to judge the storage performance, and retained capacity tends to be ignored. This originates from the idea that as long as cells can be recharged, there is no need to worry about the remaining capacity. In reality, if a fast self-discharge due to parasite reactions happens during storage, it cannot be observed from the recovered capacity, but only from the retained capacity. If cells with such fast self-discharge are frequently recharged, the cell performance will deteriorate since the cells are damaged by parasite reactions. Thus, the retained capacity is an indicator to evaluate the stability of cells.

Practically, in order to check their initial capacity, the cells are first electrochemically tested at room temperature. Then cells are stored in chamber with a temperature of 60° C. With intervals of a month, cells are taken out from the chamber and electrochemically tested again at room temperature. This HT-storage test can bring the information of cell stability under long time exposure at high temperature. The reported values are the ratio of the retained capacity after storage to the initial discharge capacity (expressed in %) and the ratio of the recovered capacity after storage to initial discharge capacity (expressed in %).

In this invention, the prepared 650 mAh pouch-type cells after the “final charge” step (h)) are tested by high temperature storage following the schedule in Table 1.

TABLE 1Schedule of HT storage testStepCut-offTemp.No.StatusC-ratevoltage (V)TimeSymbol(° C.)1CC-Discharge1C2.73 hrs—252CC-Charge1C4.23 hrsCQ13CC-Discharge1C2.73 hrsDQ14CC-Charge1C4.23 hrs—5DCR test6Storage——one monthStorage 1607CC-Discharge1C2.73 hrsPDQ2258CC-Charge1C4.23 hrsCQ29CC-Discharge1C2.73 hrsDQ210CC-Charge1C4.23 hrs—11DCR testRepeat step 6-11

The cells are tested in two storage cycles. Before and after the period of storage, there is one cycle of charge/discharge in order to calculate the retained and recovered capacity. The retained capacity after storage 1 is obtained by PDQ2 from step 7 in Table 1, and the recovered capacity after storage 1 can be measured from DQ2 from step 9 in Table 1. In order to compare the storage performance of difference cells, these two parameters are normalized by DQ1. So,Normalized retained capacity of storage 1=PDQ2/DQ1;Normalized recovered capacity of storage 1=DQ2/DQ1.

The invention is further illustrated in the following examples:

EXAMPLE 1: FORMATION DATA AND DCR OF FRESH FULL CELLS

This example describes the effect of the electrode additives on:

the capacity properties of a full cell during the formation step (f) (see A) Full cell making) and

the DCR of fresh NMC-full cells (=full cells prepared after the formation step).

The full cells are labelled as follows:

Full cell without addition of additives into the slurry of the positive electrode: Ref-cell;

Full cell with addition of Li4WO5in the slurry: W-cell, as is described in US2015/0021518;

Full cell with addition of Li4MgWO6in the slurry: MW-cell;

Full cell with addition of Li4NiWO6in the slurry: NW-cell.

Table 2 shows the electrochemical properties of these cells when being prepared during the formation step. Compared with the Ref-cell, which has no additives in the slurry, all the cells with additives have a slightly lower capacity and energy density. But it is clear that the capacity and energy losses brought by the additives are not significant.

TABLE 2Electrochemical properties of full cells during formationVolumetricGravimetricSpecificCoulombicAverageEnergyEnergyCellCapacityCapacityEfficiencyVoltageDensityDensityname(mAh)(mAh/g)(%)(V)(Wh/L)(Wh/kg)Ref-65215385.93.70369171cellW-62814885.13.70350166cellMW-63415085.33.70350167cellNW-63415085.43.70359168cell

Coulombic Efficiency (%): ratio (in % for a charge-discharge cycle) between the energy removed from a battery during discharge compared with the energy used during charging. It is obtained from the ratio of discharge capacity in the first cycle to capacity in the same cycle. Average Voltage (V): the average voltage during discharge

Volumetric Energy Density (Wh/L): stored battery energy that is the product of voltage and discharge capacity in such voltage range per unit volume of battery

Gravimetric Energy Density (Wh/kg): stored battery energy that is the product of voltage and discharge capacity in such voltage range per unit mass of battery

FIGS.1and2show the DC resistance results of fresh cells at each state of charge (SOC) at a room temperature of 25° C., and at a low temperature of −10° C., respectively. In each graph, the DC resistance of the cells (expressed in “mOhm”) is plotted against the state of charge (in percentage of full charge). At 25° C., compared with the reference cell that has no additive in the positive electrode, the addition of Li4WO5, Li4MgWO6and Li4NiWO6reduces the DC resistance, while the addition of Li3NbO4brings barely any benefit on limiting the resistance. In the low state of charge, the DC resistances at −10° C. are quite similar for slurry-modified cells and are all lower compared to the reference cell. In the high state of charge, the effect on DC resistances at −10° C. is less pronounced. The addition of Li4WO5and Li4MgWO6has the best overall results.

Accordingly, electrochemical tests on above fresh cells prove that the addition of lithium heavy metal oxide compounds into the positive electrode has no noticeable negative effect on capacity and energy density, and some additives like Li4WO5, Li4NiWO6and Li4MgWO6show promising DCR properties. In view of the intended use of the full cells, it is clear that for cells having comparable results before being intensively cycled, the results of cycle stability and DCR-evolution during cycling are more important, as is shown in the following example.

EXAMPLE 2

Cycle Stability and Dcr of Full Cells

This example presents the effect of lithium heavy metal oxide additives on full cells in the aspect of cycling stability and evolution of DC resistance during cycling.FIGS.3and4give the cycle life of the full cells of Example 1 being cycled in the voltage range of 4.2V to 2.7V at 25° C. and 45° C., respectively. InFIG.3, the cycle life of electrode-modified cells are similar to the reference cell during 1400 cycles, and the benefit of the additives seems not obvious for cycle stability at room temperature. InFIG.4however, compared to the prior art W-cell and the Ref-cell, the MW- and NW-cell present a better cycling performance. So it can be concluded that the addition of lithium nickel tungsten oxide, lithium magnesium tungsten oxide and lithium niobium oxide brings an advantage to cycling stability, which is more pronounced than the addition of lithium tungsten oxide.

FIGS.5and6show the DC resistance measured every one hundred cycles during the cycling of full cells at 25° C. and 45° C., respectively. The DC resistance of each cell increases during cycling. Compared to Ref-cell at 25° C., the Nb- and NW-cells have a similar performance, and the MW-cell has the smallest increase of DCR. The W-cell however has the worst DCR growth at room temperature. Thus, at room temperature, even though the W-cell has the smallest initial DCR (seeFIG.1), its DCR growth is the largest, which deteriorates the cycling performance. At higher temperature, the performance of DCR growth is quite similar for all cells.

Thus, in the cycling tests of full cells, addition of Li4MgWO6or Li4NiWO6in the positive electrode leads to a much improved cyclability and good DC resistance. These additives are more effective and beneficial than Li4WO5.

EXAMPLE 3

Stability and Dcr of Full Cells During Ht Storage

This example illustrates the effect of lithium heavy metal oxide additives on full cells regarding capacity and DC resistance during High Temperature storage tests.FIG.7shows the recovered capacities of the full cells of Example 1, after storage at 60° C. for a given period. In the graph, there are three groups of columns and each group corresponds to recovered capacity results after different periods of storage. “1M” represents one month, while “2M” is for two months. In each group, the number on the top of column represents a different NMC-full cell. Looking at the recovered capacities after one month storage, all full cells have quite similar results, which indicates that the additives in the slurry do not degrade the recovered capacity. With longer storage time, the recovered capacities all fade fast. Compared with the Ref-cell, W-cell has a smaller value, while the other slurry-modified cells have a higher recovered capacity. Thus, in the aspect of recovered capacity after storage, addition of Li4MgWO6or Li4NiWO6into the positive electrode can bring a positive effect, the NW-cell having the best result.

FIG.8shows the retained capacity of NMC-Full cells in Tablet after storage at 60° C. for a given period. Looking at the retained capacities after one and two months storage, all slurry-modified full cells have higher values compared to the Ref-cell. Among the modified cells, Li4MgWO6and Li4NiWO6-addition cells have the highest retained capacities. Thus, in the aspect of retained capacity of storage, addition of Li4MgWO6or Li4NiWO6into the positive electrode can lead to an improved performance.

FIG.9shows the DC resistance growth percentage of the full cells of Example 1, after storage at 60° C. for one and two months. It is obvious that the DC resistance growth % of the MW-cell and NW-cell are smaller than the value of Ref-cell under for each period of storage. The resistance growth % of the NW-cell is the best, the growth of the W-cell is worse than the reference. Thus, Li4MgWO6and Li4NiWO6additives are promising to be applied into NMC-full cells in order to reduce the DC resistance growth during storage, as well as to improve the stability of storage.

Therefore, the above discussion confirms the benefits brought by Li4MgWO6and Li4NiWO6additives in the tests of NMC-full cell cycling, HT-storage, which are high cycling and storage stability, and DC resistance growth.

EXAMPLE 4

The Phase of the Additives after 25° C. Cycling

This example demonstrates that the electrode additives introduced in the slurry remain in the electrode after a cycling test of full cells. First the MW-cell of Example 2 is disassembled after 2000 cycles. The morphology of the cycled positive electrode is analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. This measurement is conducted by a JEOL JSM 7100F scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipment under vacuum of 9.6×10−5Pa at 25° C. The spectrum of the elements in the powders of the positive electrode is analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using SEM equipment.FIG.10gives the back scattering electron image of the positive electrode of the cycled MN-cell under magnification of 2500 times. The small white dots seem to be Li4MgWO6particles, while the big spherical particles are active NMC material. Four areas are selected in the EDS test (seeFIG.10), providing information on the elements found there. Table 3 list the molar ratio percentage of W to the sum of transition metal in NMC, and the molar ratio percentage of W to Mg.

TABLE 3Molar ratio of selected areas for acycled MW-cell obtained by SEM/EDSSpectrumW/(Ni +W/Mg/PositionMn + Co)/mol %mol %#10.0—#210.375.8#30.0—#40.175.0

It is shown that areas 1 and 3 barely have a trace of W, which indicates the additive does not diffuse into NMC particles and remains on the surface of the particles or in the pores between the particles, as demonstrated by the results of areas 2 and 4. The ratio of W to Mg is smaller than its initial value in the compound of Li4MgWO6, which is believed to be caused by W partially dissolving into the electrolyte during cycling. The dissolution may be related to certain reactions that may be helpful to reduction of DCR growth. In accordance with SEM and EDS results, it can be confirmed that after a cycling test the electrode additives still exist in the positive electrode, so the additive compounds may not be electrochemically active.