Patent ID: 12252841

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.

The inventive subject matter provides compositions and methods that provide a treatment for textiles which confers durable antimicrobial properties and is suitable for wide spread use in healthcare and hospital environment. Suitable compositions can include a cationic biocide (such as polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), polyaminopropyl biguanide (PAPB), a quaternary ammonium salt, a benzalkonium salt, a chlorhexidine salt, a cetylpyridinium salt, and/or a cetyltrimethylammonium salt) and a hydrophilic biocompatible polymer (such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), polyacrylamide, poly(2-oxazoline), polyethylenimine, poly(acrylic acid), polymethacrylate, poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), and/or poly(vinylpyrrolidone)), which have surprisingly been found to be effective in combination to provide a highly durable fabric treatment that eliminates a broad spectrum of pathogens, including drug-resistant bacteria and enveloped viruses, by multiple antimicrobial mechanisms. Such compositions and treatments have also unexpectedly been found to improve tearing strength, resilience, softness, and smoothness of the treated textiles. These improvements are sustained through multiple (e.g. 50 or more) washings performed under stringent hospital conditions.

In some embodiments a binder is included for application onto various cellulose materials via a pad-dry-cure process. Surprisingly the antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal properties of textiles treated with such a composition can be maintained even after 104 cycles of aggressive laundering under stringent hospital washing conditions. In addition, the tearing strength, resilience, softness and smoothness of the antimicrobial textile are improved (e.g. increased) or maintained.

Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the inventive subject matter will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments. In some embodiments, the numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as concentration, reaction conditions, and so forth, used to describe and claim certain embodiments of the invention are to be understood as being modified in some instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters set forth in the written description and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by a particular embodiment. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of some embodiments of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as practicable. The numerical values presented in some embodiments of the invention may contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.

As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided with respect to certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.

Groupings of alternative elements or embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are not to be construed as limitations. Each group member can be referred to and claimed individually or in any combination with other members of the group or other elements found herein. One or more members of a group can be included in, or deleted from, a group for reasons of convenience and/or patentability. When any such inclusion or deletion occurs, the specification is herein deemed to contain the group as modified thus fulfilling the written description of all Markush groups used in the appended claims.

One should appreciate that the disclosed techniques provide many advantageous technical effects including providing textiles and other cellulosic materials that can reduce the transmission of pathogenic bacteria and viruses, particularly in a hospital or other clinical setting, thereby improving patient outcomes.

The following discussion provides many example embodiments of the inventive subject matter. Although each embodiment represents a single combination of inventive elements, the inventive subject matter is considered to include all possible combinations of the disclosed elements. Thus if one embodiment comprises elements A, B, and C, and a second embodiment comprises elements B and D, then the inventive subject matter is also considered to include other remaining combinations of A, B, C, or D, even if not explicitly disclosed.

As used herein, and unless the context dictates otherwise, the term “coupled to” is intended to include both direct coupling (in which two elements that are coupled to each other contact each other) and indirect coupling (in which at least one additional element is located between the two elements). Therefore, the terms “coupled to” and “coupled with” are used synonymously.

Compositions of the inventive subject matter are useful for providing an antimicrobial textile which is suitable for repeated laundering under hospital washing conditions. Such compositions can be applied to cellulosic textiles and to other cellulosic materials, as well as textiles made from synthetic polymers and mixtures of synthetic polymers and cellulosic materials. Such textiles can be in any suitable form, such as filters, wipes, absorbent pads, wound dressings, articles of clothing, bedclothes, towels, etc.

One embodiment of the inventive concept is a coating composition that includes polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) in solution in combination with polyethylene glycol (PEG). PHMB can be present in concentrations ranging from 1% to 99%, 5% to 90%, 10% to 70%, about 10%, about 20%, about 30%, about 40%, and/or less than about 50% (w/v). The PEG used can have a molecular weight ranging from about 300 to about 10,000 Daltons. Suitable solvents include aqueous solvents (e.g. water, buffered aqueous solutions), suitable organic solvents (e.g. methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, acetone, DMSO, other water-miscible solvents, and mixtures thereof). In a preferred embodiment the coating composition includes PHMB at about 20% w/v and PEG having a molecular weight of from about 300 Daltons to about 1,000 Daltons (e.g. PEG 300-PEG 1000) in aqueous solution.

Such an antimicrobial coating composition can include a binder or binder compound (e.g. a polyamine, a polyacrylate, and/or a polyurethane), and can be applied onto various cellulosic, synthetic polymer, or mixed cellulosic/synthetic polymer materials by any suitable process. Suitable processes include spraying, immersion, and padding of the coating liquid onto the cellulose material. Application of the coating composition can be followed by drying (for example, at ambient or elevated temperatures) in order to form an antimicrobial coating. In some embodiments such a drying step can be followed by a curing step, which can be performed at a temperature higher than that of the drying step. In a preferred embodiment the coating composition is applied using a pad-dry-cure process.

An example of a pad transfer-dry-cure process of the inventive concept is shown inFIG.1. As shown, a suitable fabric or fibrous materials (e.g. one containing cellulosic and/or synthetic polymer fibers) can be coated with an antimicrobial coating composition of the inventive concept by pad transfer. Once a suitable level of coating saturation is achieved (e.g. about 70% to 80%) the material is dried. Drying can be accomplished at ambient (i.e. room) temperature or at an elevated temperature (e.g. about 90° C.). Drying is typically completed in from about 1 minute to about 10 minutes. The dried material is then cured by exposure to an elevated temperature (e.g. about 120° C. to about 140° C.) to provide a durable antimicrobial material of the inventive concept. The curing process typically requires from about 30 seconds to about 1 minute.

Treated fabrics obtained by application of the coating composition have antibacterial, antiviral, and/or antifungal properties. Membrane-targeted mechanism(s) of the antimicrobial composition provided herein can reduce or eliminate a broad spectrum of pathogens including drug-resistant bacteria and enveloped virus (including Influenza virus). More importantly and surprisingly, these properties are maintained through at least 104 cycles of accelerated launderings under stringent hospital washing conditions. It should be appreciated that each cycle under such conditions is equivalent to about five domestic or conventional commercial washes. Surprisingly, the mechanical property, such as tearing strength, is improved relative to the corresponding untreated fabrics, whereas the tactile properties, such as resilience, softness and smoothness, of the treated fabrics are maintained after about 50 or more washings under stringent hospital conditions.

Such durable antimicrobial textiles are highly suitable for widespread use in healthcare and hospital environments, and other environments where hygiene control is of supreme importance, such as hotels/resorts, cruise ships, daycare facilities, schools, board and care facilities, rehabilitation facilities, gymnasiums, prisons, and/or wherever contagion is a significant concern.

Any cellulose fabric, such as cotton fabric, or cellulosic material, such as paper, can be utilized as the substrate. Suitable fabrics can be knit, woven, or non-woven. Suitable antimicrobial coating compositions are aqueous solutions that can include from about 5% to 15% v/v of PHMB (as a 20% w/v solution of its hydrochloride salt), 5% to 10% v/v of PEG with an average molecular weight in the range of 300 to 1000 Daltons, and 3% to 8% v/v of a solution of a binder. Suitable binders include polyamines, polyacrylates, and/or polyurethanes.

Such a coating composition can be applied to a cellulosic fabric using a “pad-dry-cure” method. For example, a cellulosic fabric can be dipped into and/or padded with a coating composition of the inventive concept at room temperature until a wet pick-up of from about 70% to 80% is achieved. The treated fabric can then be dried at ambient temperature or at about 90° C. for from about 1 to 10 minutes, followed by curing at about 120° C. to about 140° C. for about 30 seconds to about 1 minute.

It should also be appreciated that non-cellulosic or polymer fabrics are also suitable for use in compositions and methods of the inventive concept. For example, textiles and/or surfaces that are made from or include polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinylchloride, polystyrene, polyurethane, polyamide, and/or fluoroethylene polymers can be suitable substrates. Mixed fabrics or materials incorporating both cellulosic and polymeric fibers are also suitable for use in compositions and methods of the inventive concept. An antimicrobial composition of the inventive concept can be applied to such polymer fabrics by padding at ambient temperature, followed by drying at about 90° C. for from about 1 to 10 minutes.

It has been found that PHMB kills bacteria, fungi, parasites and certain viruses with a high therapeutic index (Muller G, Kramer, A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2008; 61: 1281-1287). The electrostatic attractions between the positively charged biguanide groups of PHMB and the negatively charged bacterial cell surface cause the disruption of the bacterial cell wall leading to cell death. It has also been reported that PEG 400, 600 and 1000 can have significant antibacterial activity against various pathogenic bacteria such asStaphylococcus aureusandKlebsiella pneumoniae(Chirife J, Herszage L, Joseph A, Bozzini J P, Leardini N, Kohn E S. In vitro antibacterial activity of concentrated polyethylene glycol 400 solutions. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1983; 24: 409-412; Sójka-Ledakowicz J, Chruściel J J, Kudzin M H, Łatwińska M, Kiwala M. Antimicrobial Functionalization of textile materials with copper silicate. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe. 2016; 24: 151-156; Nalawade T M, Bhat K, Sogi S H P. Bactericidal activity of propylene glycol, glycerin, polyethylene glycol 400, and polyethylene glycol 1000 against selected microorganisms. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2015; 5: 114-119). It should also be appreciated that PEG can inhibit bacterial adhesion, for example to implant surfaces (Jinkins R S, Leonas K K. Influence of a polyethylene glycol treatment on surface, liquid barrier and antibacterial properties. Textile Chemist & Colorist. 1994; 26: 25-29). With the combined antimicrobial mechanisms of PHMB and PEG, the treated fabrics discussed herein provide a unique antimicrobial mechanism that is effective in killing a broad spectrum of pathogens, which is highly beneficial for hospital and healthcare facility use.

PHMB is thought to attach to the carboxyl groups of the cellulosic substrate (resulting from chemical finishing) via hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions (Blackburn R S, Harvey A, Kettle L L, Payne J D, Russell S J. Sorption of poly(hexamethylenebiguanide) on cellulose: mechanism of binding and molecular recognition. Langmuir. 1994; 26: 25-29). However, conventional PHMB-based agents can be abraded away under stringent washing conditions in the presence of detergents and oxidizing agents (e.g. bleach). In some embodiments polymer binders provided in coating formulations of the inventive concept serve to enhance wash durability through strong interactions with both the cellulose surface and the antimicrobial reagents. It should also be appreciated that PEG forms a net-like polymeric matrix that serves to couple the binder and PHMB to fibers of the coated fabric. Surprisingly (particularly in consideration of the high aqueous solubility of PEG), such a combination results in a sustained and effective antimicrobial activity of the treated fabric that remains through and after at least 104 repetitions of stringent hospital laundering cycles, as well as dry pressing.

Another embodiment of the inventive concept is an article of clothing incorporating a fabric treated with a combination of PHMB, PEG, and (optionally) a binder as described above. Such articles of clothing can be dimensioned for an adult, child, or infant. Such an article of clothing can be constructed in whole or in part from a cellulosic and/or polymeric fabric that has been treated previously. Alternatively, such an article of clothing can be prepared from conventional cellulosic and/or polymeric fabric followed by treatment of all or part of the article with a combination of PHMB, PEG, and (optionally) a binder. Suitable articles of clothing include shoes, slippers, stockings, underwear, cloth diapers, support garments, pants, dresses, skirts, men's and/or women's shirts, laboratory or medical practitioner's coats, pajamas or other nightclothes, hats, headscarves, and/or gloves. Such an article of clothing can include indicia of its antimicrobial character. Suitable indicia include a characteristic color, pattern, or design and/or a human or machine-readable label or tag.

Laundering Durability Evaluation: A laundering durability evaluation was carried out using accelerated laundering test under typical stringent hospital washing conditions (Laird K, Riley K. Chapter 13. Antimicrobial textiles for medical environments. Antimicrobial Textiles. (1st ed.). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2016). One accelerated laundering is generally considered to be equivalent to 5 cycles of domestic laundering (Laundering durable antibacterial cotton fabrics grafted with pomegranate-shaped polymer wrapped in silver nanoparticle aggregations. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:5920).

The fabrics were washed in a rotating closed canister containing an aqueous washing solution in a thermostatically controlled water bath at given temperature operating at 40±2 rpm. Two conditions were utilized in the laundering tests:The laundering test was performed at 65° C. with detergent (0.0065%, w/v) and an oxygen-based bleaching agent (300 ppm) for 10 minutes (Condition I)The laundering test was performed at 75° C. with detergent (0.0065%, w/v) for 5 minutes (Condition II)
After laundering, fabric samples were stored under standard conditions at 20±2° C. temperature and 65±2% relative humidity for at least 24 hours prior to antimicrobial testing.

Dry Pressing: The dry pressing test was performed following procedures described in ISO 105-X11. The dry specimen was placed on top of the cotton cloth covering the wool flannel padding. The top plate of the heating device was lowered and the specimen was left for 15 seconds at 150° C. followed by antimicrobial testing.

Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficiency:

Quantitative testing was performed following procedures described in AATCC 100-2004 with slight modifications. BothKlebsiella pneumoniaeandStaphylococcus aureuswere grown in 5 mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) and incubated at 37° C. for 18 hours with shaking at 250 rpm. The OD600of the bacteria culture was measured using an optical density reader and adjusted to an OD600of 1.0. This time point was set as the “0 hour”. The initial bacterial count at 0 hour was determined by diluting the bacteria 103to 107-fold using a 0.9% saline solution. One hundred fifty μL of the appropriate bacterial dilution was removed and spread on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates. The average bacterial count was then determined to be in the range of 2×108to 8×108CFU/mL.

The fabric test specimen was cut into square samples each with an area of 1.5 cm2, one of which was placed in each of a series of Petri dishes. The negative control was a fabric sample without antimicrobial coating and was made from the same base fabric as the treated samples. One hundred μL of the appropriate dilution of bacterial culture was then added to the fabric sample. When testing fabric samples at the 0-hour time point bacteria in the fabric samples were eluted immediately using 5 mL of a 0.9% saline solution. When testing fabric samples after 18 hours incubation the bacteria in the fabric samples were eluted as described above after incubating with the fabrics up to 18 hours in a moisture chamber at 37° C. One hundred fifty μL of the washed-out solution was taken and spread on a TSA plate and the plates were incubated at 37° C. for 18 hours. The colonies on each plate were counted and the colony forming unit per milliliter of bacteria (CFU/ml) was calculated. Only the colony numbers between 25-250 were used to calculate the CFU/ml.

The percentage reduction of bacteria (R) was calculated using

R=B-AB×100
where A=number of bacteria recovered from treated specimen after 18 hours; B=number of bacteria recovered from the untreated specimen at zero-contact time.

Other Fabric Properties: The fabric hand properties, i.e. resilience, softness and smoothness, were evaluated following procedures described in AATCC Test Method 202-2012. Tear strength tests of all the control and treated fabrics in warp and weft courses were performed according to procedures described in ISO 13937-2.

Results of antibacterial testing are shown below in Table 1.

TABLE 1PEG-PHMB400BinderReduction %[a]SampleFabric(%)(%)(%)SAKPExample 1Cotton553[b]>99.9>99.9Example 2Cotton558[b]>99.9>99.9Example 3Cotton5105[c]>99.9>99.9Example 4Cotton10105[c]>99.9>99.9Example 5Cotton1058[c]>99.9>99.9Example 6Cotton1058[b]>99.9>99.9Example 7Cotton1558[c]>99.9>99.9Example 8Cotton1558[b]>99.9>99.9Example 9Polypropylene558[b]>99.9>99.9Example 10Polypropylene1058[b]>99.9>99.9SA =Streptococcusaureus;KP =Klebsiellapneumoniae[a]The percentage reduction (R) of bacteria was calculated using:R=B-AB×100where A = number of bacteria recovered from treated specimen after 18 hours;B = number of bacteria recovered from the untreated specimen at zero-contact time;[b]polyurethane;[c]polyamine
Table 1 shows results of quantitative testing for antibacterial activity in different fabric samples (cotton or polypropylene) treated with different antimicrobial coatings that include PHMB, PEG, and a binder compound (either polyurethane or polyamine). All the treated fabrics show significant antibacterial effects (>99.9% reduction) against both exemplary gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species, indicating that such treated fabrics have substantially high, broad spectrum antibacterial effectiveness.

Dry pressing tests on the treated fabric were performed to determine the resistance of the antimicrobial finishes when subjected to hot pressing to mimic the dry ironing conditions under hospital settings. The ironed fabrics show significant antibacterial effects (>99.9% reduction) against both exemplary gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species, indicating that the antimicrobial properties of treated cotton fabrics remain unchanged after hot pressing.

It should be appreciated that the treated fabrics of the inventive concept also have strong antibacterial properties against drug-resistant bacteria including Carbapenem-resistantEscherichia coli(CRE), multidrug-resistantAcinetobacter baumannii(MRAB) and Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). Such drug-resistant bacteria are often encountered in hospital acquired infections, and are difficult to treat. It is believed that the antimicrobial compositions and fabrics of the inventive concept target to cell surface structures of the pathogenic microbes (such as drug-resistant bacteria), leading to disruption of cell wall and/or membrane and subsequent cell death by mechanisms independent of such antibiotics. Results of testing for antimicrobial activity against representative drug-resistant bacterial strains are shown in Table 2. As shown, a treated cotton fabric of the inventive concept has a high degree of antimicrobial activity against all three exemplary drug-resistant bacteria, indicating that such coated fabrics are effective against a broad range of drug-resistant bacteria.

TABLE 2Reduction %[b]SampleCREMRABMRSATreated Cotton Fabric[a]>99.9>99.9>99.9[a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); polyurethane binder: 8% (v/v);[b]The percentage reduction (R) of bacteria was calculated using:R=B-AB×100where A = number of bacteria recovered from treated specimen after 18 hours;B = number of bacteria recovered from the untreated specimen at zero-contact time.

Treated fabrics of the inventive concept can withstand multiple washings (at least 104 cycles of launderings) under stringent hospital washing conditions and maintain their antimicrobial properties. As shown in Table 3, treated fabrics of the inventive concept show significant bacterial reduction (>99.9%) for both drug-sensitive (SA and KP) and drug-resistant (CRE, MRAB, and MRSA) bacterial species, even after 104 cycles of laundering under two different stringent hospital washing conditions. This indicates that the antimicrobial coating is firmly coupled to the textile.

TABLE 3Reduction %[b]Species Exposed to TreatedWashingWashingCotton Fabric[a]Condition I[c]Condition II[d]SA>99.9>99.9KP>99.9>99.9CRE>99.9>99.9MRAB>99.9>99.9MRSA>99.9>99.9[a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); polyurethane binder: 8% (v/v);[b]The percentage reduction (R) of bacteria was calculated usingR=B-AB×100where A = number of bacteria recovered from treated specimen after 18 hours;B = number of bacteria recovered from the untreated specimen at zero-contact time;[c]Each washing cycle was performed at 65° C. for 10 min with detergent and hydrogen peroxide (300 ppm);[d]Each washing cycle was performed at 75° C. for 5 min with detergent.

As noted above, compositions and fabrics of the inventive concept have antimicrobial activity against non-bacterial species, including fungal and viral pathogens. Anti-fungal activity was determined using the yeastCandida albicans, a common fungal pathogen. Fabric samples were cut into 25 mm×25 mm pieces and permeated with a fungal suspension (1×106CFU/mLCandida albicans) in normal saline. After incubation for one hour at ambient temperature the soaked fabric samples were gently pressed onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates for 10 seconds. The fabric samples were then removed and the agar plates incubated at 35° C. overnight. Resulting colonies were counted to estimate colony-forming units (CFU) remaining on the fabric samples. As shown in Table 4, fabric treated with an antimicrobial composition of the inventive concept exhibits a strong and wash-durable antifungal effect againstCandida albicans(CA), which is commonly found in community and healthcare environments. No observable growth ofCandida albicans(i.e. a nearly 100% kill rate) was found for the treated cotton fabric before and after 104 stringent hospital washing cycles.

TABLE 4SampleCAUntreated Cotton Fabric>200 CFU[b]Treated Cotton Fabric[a]No growthTreated Cotton Fabric after 104 washing cycles[c]No growth[a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); and polyurethane binder; 8% (v/v);[b]CFU = Colony forming unit;[c]Each washing cycle was performed at 65° C. for 10 min with detergent and hydrogen peroxide (300 ppm).

Antimicrobial coating and treated fabrics of the inventive concept also have antiviral activities. Antiviral activity was evaluated using an H1N1 influenza virus (influenza A/HK/415742/P4-pdmH1N1). This strain has a TCDI50of approximately 106/mL. One hundred μL samples of this virus at the TCID50were directly added to samples of fabric (3 cm×3 cm) on a petri dish. A negative control was established in a separate petri dish. The fabric samples were incubated at ambient temperature. Viral transport medium (VTM; 0.9 mL) was added immediately (time point: 0) or after 10 min, 30 min, or 60 min, followed by expression of the fabric samples with a pair of forceps in order to recover the virus into the medium. The recovered virus samples from the test samples/negative control were then diluted for titration curve studies. Each sample was subjected to a series of 10-fold serial dilutions, and each dilution of the sample was added in triplicate (100 μL per well) to the wells of 96-well plates containing Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells (approximately 104cells per well). This was followed by 1-hour incubation. After washing with PBS once, the culture medium was replaced with Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) containing 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin. Cytopathic effects (CPE) were evaluated daily and TCID50was calculated on day 2 to 3. Table 5 shows that the antiviral activity of the treated cotton fabric against the influenza Type A H1N1 virus is sustained under stringent hospital laundering conditions. Such strong viricidal effects of a treated fabric (i.e. a TCID50reduction of 4 log10or more), particularly after 104 stringent hospital washing cycles, has not been reported previously.

TABLE 5WashingLog10TCID50/ml (H1N1 pdm09)[d]ConditionRecovered1-hourLog10Sample(104 cycles)ImmediatelyIncubationReductionTreated CottonI[b]4.500.504.00Fabric[a]Treated CottonII[c]4.830.504.33Fabric[a][a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); polyurethane binder: 8% (v/v);[b]Each washing cycle was performed at 65° C. for 10 min with detergent and hydrogen peroxide (300 ppm);[c]Each washing cycle was performed at 75° C. for 5 min with detergent;[d]TCID50: median tissue culture infectious dose.

In addition to antimicrobial and antiviral properties of the treated fabrics, coating compositions of the inventive concept are capable of improving the tactile (e.g. hand feel) and/or mechanical (e.g. tear strength) properties of such treated textiles. Compared with the control fabric, the resilience, softness and smoothness of the treated fabric were maintained through at least 50 stringent hospital washings (see Table 6). Furthermore, the antimicrobial coating and treatment was found to have a substantial effect on the tearing strength of the treated fabric. As shown in Table 7, the tearing strength is increased by more than 40% relative to untreated fabric in both warp and weft directions after application of the antimicrobial coating.

TABLE 6WashWashingSampleCyclesConditionResilienceSoftnessSmoothnessUntreated0N/A45.2169.9883.07Cotton Fabric50I[b]48.3971.6381.7350II[c]50.1470.9881.22Treated Cotton0N/A46.5071.2783.02Fabric[a]50I[b]48.9370.4582.1650II[c]49.4472.3280.43[a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); polyurethane binder: 8% (v/v);[b]Each washing cycle was performed at 65° C. for 10 min with detergent and hydrogen peroxide (300 ppm);[c]Each washing cycle was performed at 75° C. for 5 min with detergent.

TABLE 7Average Load at Average Value (5 Peaks) (N)SampleWarp DirectionWeft DirectionUntreated Cotton7.587.84FabricsTreated Cotton13.015.0Fabrics[a][a]The cotton fabric was coated with PHMB: 10% (v/v); PEG-400: 5% (v/v); polyurethane binder: 8% (v/v).

Treated fabrics of the inventive concept can withstand multiple washings (at least 104 cycles of launderings) under stringent hospital washing conditions and maintain their antimicrobial properties, indicating that the antimicrobial coating is firmly coupled to the textile substrate. Such wash-durable fabrics with enhanced antimicrobial and antiviral activity, hand feel and tearing strength are well-suited for widespread use in healthcare and hospital environments, as well as other group care environments where antimicrobial activity is desirable.

It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced. Where the specification claims refers to at least one of something selected from the group consisting of A, B, C . . . and N, the text should be interpreted as requiring only one element from the group, not A plus N, or B plus N, etc.