Patent ID: 12228539

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computer program product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or a processor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions stored on and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task may be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’ refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing cores configured to process data, such as computer program instructions.

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.

Nanopore membrane devices having pore sizes on the order of one nanometer in internal diameter have shown promise in rapid nucleotide sequencing. When a voltage potential is applied across a nanopore immersed in a conducting fluid, a small ion current attributed to the conduction of ions across the nanopore can be observed. The size of the current is sensitive to the pore size.

A nanopore based sequencing chip may be used for DNA sequencing. A nanopore based sequencing chip incorporates a large number of sensor cells configured as an array. For example, an array of one million cells may include 1000 rows by 1000 columns of cells.

FIG.1illustrates an embodiment of a cell100in a nanopore based sequencing chip. A membrane102is formed over the surface of the cell. In some embodiments, membrane102is a lipid bilayer. The bulk electrolyte114containing soluble protein nanopore transmembrane molecular complexes (PNTMC) and the analyte of interest is placed directly onto the surface of the cell. A single PNTMC104is inserted into membrane102by electroporation. The individual membranes in the array are neither chemically nor electrically connected to each other. Thus, each cell in the array is an independent sequencing machine, producing data unique to the single polymer molecule associated with the PNTMC. PNTMC104operates on the analytes and modulates the ionic current through the otherwise impermeable bilayer.

With continued reference toFIG.1, analog measurement circuitry112is connected to a metal electrode110covered by a thin film of electrolyte108. The thin film of electrolyte108is isolated from the bulk electrolyte114by the ion-impermeable membrane102. PNTMC104crosses membrane102and provides the only path for ionic current to flow from the bulk liquid to working electrode110. The cell also includes a counter electrode (CE)116, which is an electrochemical potential sensor. The cell also includes a reference electrode117.

In some embodiments, a nanopore array enables parallel sequencing using the single molecule nanopore-based sequencing by synthesis (Nano-SBS) technique.FIG.2illustrates an embodiment of a cell200performing nucleotide sequencing with the Nano-SBS technique. In the Nano-SBS technique, a template202to be sequenced and a primer are introduced to cell200. To this template-primer complex, four differently tagged nucleotides208are added to the bulk aqueous phase. As the correctly tagged nucleotide is complexed with the polymerase204, the tail of the tag is positioned in the barrel of nanopore206. The tag held in the barrel of nanopore206generates a unique ionic blockade signal210, thereby electronically identifying the added base due to the tags' distinct chemical structures.

FIG.3illustrates an embodiment of a cell about to perform nucleotide sequencing with pre-loaded tags. A nanopore301is formed in a membrane302. An enzyme303(e.g., a polymerase, such as a DNA polymerase) is associated with the nanopore. In some cases, polymerase303is covalently attached to nanopore301. Polymerase303is associated with a nucleic acid molecule304to be sequenced. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid molecule304is circular. In some cases, nucleic acid molecule304is linear. In some embodiments, a nucleic acid primer305is hybridized to a portion of nucleic acid molecule304. Polymerase303catalyzes the incorporation of nucleotides306onto primer305using single stranded nucleic acid molecule304as a template. Nucleotides306comprise tag species (“tags”)307.

FIG.4illustrates an embodiment of a process400for nucleic acid sequencing with pre-loaded tags. Stage A illustrates the components as described inFIG.3. Stage C shows the tag loaded into the nanopore. A “loaded” tag may be one that is positioned in and/or remains in or near the nanopore for an appreciable amount of time, e.g., 0.1 millisecond (ms) to 10000 ms. In some cases, a tag that is pre-loaded is loaded in the nanopore prior to being released from the nucleotide. In some instances, a tag is pre-loaded if the probability of the tag passing through (and/or being detected by) the nanopore after being released upon a nucleotide incorporation event is suitably high, e.g., 90% to 99%.

At stage A, a tagged nucleotide (one of four different types: A, T, G, or C) is not associated with the polymerase. At stage B, a tagged nucleotide is associated with the polymerase. At stage C, the polymerase is docked to the nanopore. The tag is pulled into the nanopore during docking by an electrical force, such as a force generated in the presence of an electric field generated by a voltage applied across the membrane and/or the nanopore.

Some of the associated tagged nucleotides are not base paired with the nucleic acid molecule. These non-paired nucleotides typically are rejected by the polymerase within a time scale that is shorter than the time scale for which correctly paired nucleotides remain associated with the polymerase. Since the non-paired nucleotides are only transiently associated with the polymerase, process400as shown inFIG.4typically does not proceed beyond stage D. For example, a non-paired nucleotide is rejected by the polymerase at stage B or shortly after the process enters stage C.

Before the polymerase is docked to the nanopore, the conductance of the nanopore is ˜300 picosiemens (300 pS). At stage C, the conductance of the nanopore is about 60 pS, 80 pS, 100 pS, or 120 pS, corresponding to one of the four types of tagged nucleotides respectively. The polymerase undergoes an isomerization and a transphosphorylation reaction to incorporate the nucleotide into the growing nucleic acid molecule and release the tag molecule. In particular, as the tag is held in the nanopore, a unique conductance signal (e.g., see signal210inFIG.2) is generated due to the tag's distinct chemical structures, thereby identifying the added base electronically. Repeating the cycle (i.e., stage A through E or stage A through F) allows for the sequencing of the nucleic acid molecule. At stage D, the released tag passes through the nanopore.

In some cases, tagged nucleotides that are not incorporated into the growing nucleic acid molecule will also pass through the nanopore, as seen in stage F ofFIG.4. The unincorporated nucleotide can be detected by the nanopore in some instances, but the method provides a means for distinguishing between an incorporated nucleotide and an unincorporated nucleotide based at least in part on the time for which the nucleotide is detected in the nanopore. Tags bound to unincorporated nucleotides pass through the nanopore quickly and are detected for a short period of time (e.g., less than 10 ms), while tags bound to incorporated nucleotides are loaded into the nanopore and detected for a long period of time (e.g., at least 10 ms).

FIG.5illustrates an embodiment of a circuitry500in a cell of a nanopore based sequencing chip. As mentioned above, when the tag is held in nanopore502, a unique conductance signal (e.g., see signal210inFIG.2) is generated due to the tag's distinct chemical structures, thereby identifying the added base electronically. The circuitry inFIG.5maintains a constant voltage across nanopore502when the current flow is measured. In particular, the circuitry includes an operational amplifier504and a pass device506that maintain a constant voltage equal to Vaor Vbacross nanopore502. The current flowing through nanopore502is integrated at a capacitor ncap508and measured by an Analog-to-Digital (ADC) converter510.

However, circuitry500has a number of drawbacks. One of the drawbacks is that circuitry500only measures unidirectional current flow. Another drawback is that operational amplifier504in circuitry500may introduce a number of performance issues. For example, the offset voltage and the temperature drift of operational amplifier504may cause the actual voltage applied across nanopore502to vary across different cells. The actual voltage applied across nanopore502may drift by tens of millivolts above or below the desired value, thereby causing significant measurement inaccuracies. In addition, the operational amplifier noise may cause additional detection errors. Another drawback is that the portions of the circuitry for maintaining a constant voltage across the nanopore while current flow measurements are made are area-intensive. For example, operational amplifier504occupies significantly more space in a cell than other components. As the nanopore based sequencing chip is scaled to include more and more cells, the area occupied by the operational amplifiers may increase to an unattainable size. Unfortunately, shrinking the operational amplifier's size in a nanopore based sequencing chip with a large-sized array may raise other performance issues; for example, it may exacerbate the offset and noise problems in the cells even further.

FIG.6illustrates an embodiment of a circuitry600in a cell of a nanopore based sequencing chip, wherein the voltage applied across the nanopore can be configured to vary over a time period during which the nanopore is in a particular detectable state. One of the possible states of the nanopore is an open-channel state, in which a tag-attached polyphosphate is absent from the barrel of the nanopore. Another four possible states of the nanopore correspond to the states when the four different types of tag-attached polyphosphate (A, T, G, or C) are held in the barrel of the nanopore. Yet another possible state of the nanopore is when the membrane is ruptured.FIGS.7A and7Billustrate additional embodiments of a circuitry (700and701) in a cell of a nanopore based sequencing chip, wherein the voltage applied across the nanopore can be configured to vary over a time period during which the nanopore is in a particular detectable state. In the above circuits, the operational amplifier is no longer required.

FIG.6shows a nanopore602that is inserted into a membrane612, and nanopore602and membrane612are situated between a cell working electrode614and a counter electrode616, such that a voltage is applied across nanopore602. Nanopore602is also in contact with a bulk liquid/electrolyte618. Note that nanopore602and membrane612are drawn upside down as compared to the nanopore and membrane inFIG.1. Hereinafter, a cell is meant to include at least a membrane, a nanopore, a working cell electrode, and the associated circuitry. In some embodiments, the counter electrode is shared between a plurality of cells, and is therefore also referred to as a common electrode. The common electrode can be configured to apply a common potential to the bulk liquid in contact with the nanopores in the measurements cells. The common potential and the common electrode are common to all of the measurement cells. There is a working cell electrode within each measurement cell; in contrast to the common electrode, working cell electrode614is configurable to apply a distinct potential that is independent from the working cell electrodes in other measurement cells.

InFIGS.7A and7B, instead of showing a nanopore inserted in a membrane and the liquid surrounding the nanopore, an electrical model702representing the electrical properties of the nanopore and the membrane is shown. Electrical model702includes a capacitor706that models a capacitance associated with the membrane and a resistor704that models a resistance associated with the nanopore in different states (e.g., the open-channel state or the states corresponding to having different types of tag/molecule inside the nanopore). The respective circuitry inFIGS.7A and7Bfurther includes an optional on-chip fabricated capacitor (ncap714) that is in parallel to capacitor706. In some embodiments, ncap714is added to fine tune the system, as will be described in greater detail below. In some embodiments, the extra on-chip capacitor is eliminated from the system to further reduce the size of the nanopore based sequencing chip.

FIG.8illustrates an embodiment of a process800for analyzing a molecule inside a nanopore, wherein the nanopore is inserted in a membrane. Process800may be performed using the circuitries shown inFIG.6,7A, or7B.FIG.9illustrates an embodiment of a plot of the voltage applied across the nanopore versus time when process800is performed and repeated three times. As will be described in greater detail below, the voltage applied across the nanopore is not held constant. Instead, the voltage applied across the nanopore changes over time. The rate of the voltage decay (i.e., the steepness of the slope of the applied voltage across the nanopore versus time plot) depends on the cell resistance (e.g., the resistance of resistor704inFIG.7A). More particularly, as the resistance associated with the nanopore in different states (e.g., the open-channel state, the states corresponding to having different types of tag/molecule inside the nanopore, and the state when the membrane is ruptured) are different due to the molecules'/tags' distinct chemical structure, different corresponding rates of voltage decay may be observed and thus may be used to identify the different states of the nanopore.

With reference toFIG.8andFIG.7A, at802of process800, a voltage is applied across the nanopore by coupling the nanopore to a voltage source. For example, as shown inFIG.7A, a voltage Vpre710is applied to the cell working electrode when a switch S1708is closed. As shown inFIG.9, the initial voltage applied across the nanopore is Vpre−Vliquid, where Vliquidis the voltage of the bulk liquid in contact with the nanopore. As the voltage source is connected to the working electrode, the capacitor associated with the membrane is charged and energy is stored in an electric field across the membrane.

At804of process800, the capacitor associated with the membrane (capacitor706) is discharged by decoupling the nanopore and the membrane from the voltage source, and the energy stored in the electric field across the membrane is thereby dissipated. For example, as shown inFIG.7A, the voltage source is disconnected when switch S1708is opened. After switch S1708is opened, the voltage across the nanopore begins to decay exponentially, as shown inFIG.9. The exponential decay has a RC time constant τ=RC, where R is the resistance associated with the nanopore (resistor704) and C is the capacitance in parallel with R, including the capacitance associated with the membrane C706and the capacitance associated with ncap714.

At806of process800, a rate of the decay of the voltage applied across the nanopore is determined. The rate of the voltage decay is the steepness of the slope of the applied voltage across the nanopore versus time curve, as shown inFIG.9. The rate of the voltage decay may be determined in different ways.

In some embodiments, the rate of the voltage decay is determined by measuring the voltage decay that occurs during a fixed time interval. For example, as shown inFIG.9, the voltage applied at the working electrode is first measured by ADC712at time t1, and then the voltage is again measured by ADC712at time t2. The voltage difference ΔVappliedis greater when the slope of the voltage across the nanopore versus time curve is steeper, and the voltage difference ΔVappliedis smaller when the slope of the voltage curve is less steep. Thus, ΔVappliedmay be used as a metric for determining the rate of the decay of the voltage applied across the nanopore. In some embodiments, to increase the accuracy of the measurement of the rate of voltage decay, the voltage may be measured additional times at fixed intervals. For example, the voltage may be measured at t3, t4, and so on, and the multiple measurements of ΔVappliedduring the multiple time intervals may be jointly used as a metric for determining the rate of the decay of the voltage applied across the nanopore. In some embodiments, correlated double sampling (CDS) may be used to increase the accuracy of the measurement of the rate of voltage decay.

In some embodiments, the rate of the voltage decay is determined by measuring the time duration that is required for a selected amount of voltage decay. In some embodiments, the time required for the voltage to drop from a fixed voltage V1to a second fixed voltage V2may be measured. The time required is less when the slope of the voltage curve is steeper, and the time required is greater when the slope of the voltage curve is less steep. Thus, the measured time required may be used as a metric for determining the rate of the decay of the voltage applied across the nanopore.

At808of process800, a state of the nanopore is determined based on the determined rate of voltage decay. One of the possible states of the nanopore is an open-channel state during which a tag-attached polyphosphate is absent from the barrel of the nanopore. Other possible states of the nanopore correspond to the states when different types of molecules are held in the barrel of the nanopore. For example, another four possible states of the nanopore correspond to the states when the four different types of tag-attached polyphosphate (A, T, G, or C) are held in the barrel of the nanopore. Yet another possible state of the nanopore is when the membrane is ruptured. The state of the nanopore can be determined based on the determined rate of voltage decay, because the rate of the voltage decay depends on the cell resistance; i.e., the resistance of resistor704inFIG.7A. More particularly, as the resistances associated with the nanopore in different states are different due to the molecules/tags' distinct chemical structure, different corresponding rates of voltage decay may be observed and thus may be used to identify the different states of the nanopore.

FIG.10illustrates an embodiment of the plots of the voltage applied across the nanopore versus time when the nanopore is in different states. Plot1002shows the rate of voltage decay during an open-channel state. In some embodiments, the resistance associated with the nanopore in an open-channel state is in the range of 100 Mohm to 20 Gohm. Plots1004,1006,1008, and1010show the different rates of voltage decay corresponding to the four capture states when the four different types of tag-attached polyphosphate (A, T, G, or C) are held in the barrel of the nanopore. In some embodiments, the resistance associated with the nanopore in a capture state is within the range of 200 Mohm to 40 Gohm. Note that the slope of each of the plots is distinguishable from each other.

At810of process800, it is determined whether process800is repeated. For example, the process may be repeated a plurality of times to detect each state of the nanopore. If the process is not repeated, then process800terminates; otherwise, the process restarts at802again. At802, a voltage is reasserted across the nanopore by connecting the electrode to the voltage source. For example, as shown inFIG.7A, a voltage Vpre710is applied to the cell working electrode when switch S1708is closed. As shown inFIG.9, the applied voltage jumps back up to the level of Vpre−Vliquid. As process800is repeated a plurality of times, a saw-tooth like voltage waveform is applied across the nanopore over time.FIG.9also illustrates an extrapolation curve904showing the RC voltage decay over time had the voltage Vpre710not been reasserted.

As shown above, configuring the voltage applied across the nanopore to vary over a time period during which the nanopore is in a particular detectable state has many advantages. One of the advantages is that the elimination of the operational amplifier and the pass device that are otherwise fabricated on-chip in the cell circuitry significantly reduces the footprint of a single cell in the nanopore based sequencing chip, thereby facilitating the scaling of the nanopore based sequencing chip to include more and more cells (e.g., having millions of cells in a nanopore based sequencing chip). The capacitance in parallel with the nanopore includes two portions: the capacitance associated with the membrane and the capacitance associated with the integrated chip (IC). In some embodiments, due to the thin nature of the membrane, the capacitance associated with the membrane alone can suffice to create the required RC time constant without the need for additional on-chip capacitance, thereby allowing significant reduction in cell size and chip size.

Another advantage is that the circuitry of a cell does not suffer from offset inaccuracies because Vpreis applied directly to the working electrode without any intervening circuitry. Another advantage is that since no switches are being opened or closed during the measurement intervals, the amount of charge injection is minimized.

Furthermore, the technique described above operates equally well using positive voltages or negative voltages. The voltage may be an alternating current (AC) voltage. Bidirectional measurements have been shown to be helpful in characterizing a molecular complex. In addition, bidirectional measurements are required when the type of ionic flow that is driven through the nanopore is via non-faradaic conduction. Two types of ionic flow can be driven through the nanopore: faradaic conduction and non-faradaic conduction. In faradaic conduction, a chemical reaction occurs at the surface of the metal electrode. The faradaic current is the current generated by the reduction or oxidation of some chemical substances at an electrode. The advantage of non-faradaic conduction is that no chemical reaction happens at the surface of the metal electrode.

FIG.11Aillustrates an embodiment of a reset signal that is used to control the switch that disconnects or disconnects the voltage source to or from the membrane in a cell of the nanopore based sequencing chip, such that the capacitor associated with the membrane is charged and discharged repeatedly.FIG.11Billustrates the voltage applied across the nanopore in response to the reset signal inFIG.11Aas a function of time.

When the reset signal is held at high during the time periods t1, the switch is closed, and when the reset signal is held at low during the time periods t2, the switch is open. For example, as shown inFIG.7A, after switch S1708is closed, the voltage source is connected to the working electrode, applying a voltage Vpre710to the cell working electrode, and the capacitor associated with the membrane (C706) and ncap714are charged to the voltage Vpre. As shown inFIG.11B, when the capacitors are fully charged, the voltage applied across the nanopore is Vpre−Vliquid, where Vliquidis the voltage of the bulk liquid in contact with the nanopore. Immediately after the capacitors are charged, switch S1708is opened by the low reset signal during time period t2, decoupling the nanopore and the membrane from the voltage source, and the energy stored in the electric field across the membrane is thereby dissipated. During this integrating time t2, the capacitors are discharged, and the voltage across the nanopore begins to decay exponentially, as shown inFIG.11B. The exponential decay has a RC time constant τ=RC, where R is the resistance associated with the nanopore (resistor704) and C is the capacitance in parallel with R, including the capacitance associated with the membrane C706and the capacitance associated with ncap714.

In the embodiment shown inFIGS.11A and11B, the reset signal is kept high for a very brief period only and as soon as the capacitors are charged, the capacitors are discharged and the rate of decay is determined. This results in the saw tooth voltage decay pattern as shown inFIG.11B. The voltage applied across the nanopore is at a maximum during a short time period t1, but continues to decrease throughout a longer time period t2. Since the tag is pulled into the nanopore by the electrical force generated by the voltage applied across the membrane, lower voltage levels applied across the nanopore during the integration time period t2may cause a tag that is already trapped in the nanopore to escape from the nanopore. In addition, if a tag is within a close proximity to the nanopore and is poised to be pulled into the nanopore, a continuously decreasing applied voltage reduces the chance that the tag is captured into the nanopore. Therefore, the voltage applied across the nanopore over time may affect the performance of the nanopore based sequencing chip, and an improved applied voltage pattern across the nanopore would be desirable.

FIG.12Aillustrates another embodiment of a reset signal that is used to control the switch that connects or disconnects the voltage source to or from the membrane in a cell of the nanopore based sequencing chip, such that the capacitor associated with the membrane is charged and discharged repeatedly.FIG.12Billustrates the voltage applied across the nanopore in response to the reset signal inFIG.12Aas a function of time.

When the reset signal is held at high during the time periods t1, the switch is closed, and when the reset signal is held at low during the time periods t2, the switch is open. For example, as shown inFIG.7A, after switch S1708is closed, the voltage source is connected to the working electrode, applying a voltage Vpre710to the cell working electrode, and the capacitor associated with the membrane (C706) and ncap714are charged to the voltage Vpre. As shown inFIG.12B, when the capacitors are fully charged, the voltage applied across the nanopore is Vpre−Vliquid, where Vliquidis the voltage of the bulk liquid in contact with the nanopore. After the capacitors are fully charged, switch S1708is kept closed by the high reset signal during time period t1, thereby maintaining the voltage applied across the nanopore at Vpre−Vliquidduring time period t1. Switch S1708is then opened by the low reset signal during time period t2, decoupling the nanopore and the membrane from the voltage source, and the energy stored in the electric field across the membrane is thereby dissipated. During this shortened integrating time t2, the capacitors are discharged, and the voltage across the nanopore decays exponentially, as shown inFIG.12B. The exponential decay has a RC time constant τ=RC, where R is the resistance associated with the nanopore (resistor704) and C is the capacitance in parallel with R, including the capacitance associated with the membrane C706and the capacitance associated with ncap714.

In the embodiment shown inFIGS.12A and12B, the reset signal is kept high after the capacitors are fully charged. The duty cycle of the reset signal is the percentage of one reset signal period during which the reset signal is ON, wherein one reset signal period is the time it takes the reset signal to complete an ON-and-OFF cycle. The duty cycle of the reset signal inFIG.12Ais t1/(t1+t2). As shown inFIG.12A, one period of the reset signal is also the sampling period, tsampling, in which the measurement data corresponding to a single voltage decay curve of a cell is sampled and outputted from the chip. The sampling frequency is 1/tsampling. The duty cycle of the reset signal is also the percentage of one sampling period during which the voltage applied across the nanopore is held at a high level. As an illustrative example, one particular embodiment has a sampling rate of 1 kHz and a sampling period of 1 ms, and the duty cycle is 0.8, with t1=800 μs and t2=200 μs. The duty cycle is at least 0.1. However, the duty cycle may be different in different embodiments and may be adjusted for optimized performance based on different factors and constraints of the system, as will be described in greater detail below.

By increasing the duty cycle of the reset signal, the voltage applied across the nanopore is held constant at a high level for a portion of the sampling period tsampling, the exponential decay is delayed to a latter portion of the sampling period, and the duration of the voltage exponential decay is shortened as compared to the original exponential voltage decay inFIG.11B(also shown as a dashed curve inFIG.12B). The average voltage applied across the nanopore during the sampling period is also increased. As a result, a tag that is already trapped in the nanopore is less likely to escape from the nanopore due to a lower applied voltage across the nanopore. In addition, a tag that is within a close proximity to the nanopore has a higher chance of being pulled into the nanopore by the electrical force generated by the voltage applied across the membrane. The probabilities that the tags get captured and stay captured in a nanopore are both increased. Having a steady applied voltage over a significant portion of a sampling period, as opposed to having a varying voltage throughout the entire sampling period, also provides a more stable environment for the chemicals of the cell to operate within. In addition, the integration time is no longer tied to the sampling period. Decoupling the integration time from the sampling period is advantageous because the integration time can be reduced without increasing the sampling frequency, which may otherwise cause a significant increase in output data.

The duty cycle of the reset signal may be adjusted for optimized performance based on different factors and constraints of the system or user inputs, for example by a processor. One of the constraints in determining the duty cycle is the minimum voltage applied across the nanopore. The predetermined minimum voltage applied across the nanopore should be high enough such that the tags can be captured and stay captured in the nanopore. In some embodiments, the minimum voltage is 60% of the initial voltage. For example, if the initial voltage before any discharge is 100 mV, then the minimum voltage may be maintained above 60 mV.

As shown inFIG.12B, although the new voltage decay curve may use a different RC time constant and thus have a steeper slope and faster decay than the original voltage decay curve, the lowest voltage applied across the nanopore may be maintained above the same predetermined minimum Vappliedthreshold, Vmin, and the corresponding duty cycle may be determined based on the relationships as shown below.

The exponential decay has a RC time constant τ=RC, where R is the resistance associated with the nanopore (resistor704) and C is the capacitance in parallel with R, including the capacitance associated with the membrane C706and the capacitance associated with ncap714. One way to achieve a faster voltage decay is to decrease the capacitance in parallel with R. In some embodiments, the capacitance of ncap714is about 40 fF and the capacitance associated with the membrane C706is about 25 fF. However, other combinations of capacitances may be used as well. The voltage decay is described by the following relationship:

V⁡(t)=V0⁡(e-t/τ)Equation⁢⁢1
where V(t) is the voltage of the capacitors at time t after the switch708opens, V0is the voltage of the capacitors prior to any discharge (Vpre), and τ is the RC time constant.

Therefore, given a predetermined minimum Vappliedthreshold, Vmin, and a given tsampling, t2may be determined using Equation 2 below:

Vmin=Vp⁢r⁢e⁡(e-t⁢⁢2/τ)-VliquidEquation⁢⁢2

and the duty cycle may be determined using Equation 3 below:

duty⁢⁢cycle=(tsampling-t2)⁢/⁢tsamplingEquation⁢⁢3

Another constraint in determining the duty cycle is the amount of decay of Vappliedduring the integrating period t2. The absolute or relative drop in Vappliedshould be large enough in order to maintain a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio at the ADC (e.g., ADC converter510). The threshold amount of reduction in Vappliedmay be maintained by adjusting the duty cycle, which can be determined based on Equations 1-3 described above.

In some embodiments, the duty cycle may be optimized such that the time period t1during which Vappliedis held steady is maximized, while keeping the absolute or relative voltage decay and/or the minimum Vappliedacross the nanopore above certain predetermined respective thresholds.

In some embodiments, the duty cycle of the reset signal may be dynamically adjusted such that different types of salt solution/electrolyte and different concentrations of the salt solution/electrolyte may be used by the nanopore based sequencing chip. The steepness of the voltage decay curve is affected by the different types of salt solution/electrolyte and different concentrations of the salt solution/electrolyte used. In order to provide the flexibility of selecting different types of salt and the salt concentration level to the end-user of the chip, the chip may receive user indications of the type of salt and concentration of the salt solution as inputs, and the duty cycle may be dynamically adjusted for optimized performance. In some embodiments, the salt concentration is 500 mM, and t1=870 μs, t2=130 μs, and the duty cycle=0.87. In some embodiments, the salt concentration is 250 mM, and t1=740 μs, t2=260 μs, and the duty cycle=0.74.

FIG.13illustrates an embodiment of a process1300for dynamically configuring the duty cycle of the reset signal based on the salt type and salt concentration. At1302, user indications of the type of salt and concentration of the salt solution are received as inputs. At1304, characteristics of the voltage decay curve (e.g., the slope) are determined based on the type of salt and concentration of the salt solution. At1306, the duty cycle of the reset signal is optimized such that the time period t1during which Vappliedis held steady is maximized, while keeping the absolute or relative voltage decay and/or the minimum Vappliedacross the nanopore above certain predetermined respective thresholds. At1308, the duty cycle of the reset signal is configured.

Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.