Patent ID: 12221401

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For optimizing the explosive properties, the following procedures were performed in more than a hundred varied experiments, resulting in powerful explosive reports shattering the compression cells.

In all embodiments, the explosive mixture compositionally comprises a powdered deuteride of an alkaline earth metal mixed with a catalytic mixture, wherein said catalytic mixture comprises red phosphorous powder and a powdered transition metal. This mixture is compressible for producing a strong explosion.

Best mode experiments employed calcium deuteride, which was produced by heating turnings of calcium metal in an atmosphere of deuterium within a silica tube. The deuteride lumps were then ground to a powder with mortar and pestle, and mixed with similar weights of red phosphorus powder and manganese powder, to yield the best prescribed explosive mixture for the following experiments. Care was taken to manufacture and store this explosive mixture with minimum exposure to air and moisture, which would ruin its efficacy The particle sizes of the respective powders were distributed in the range up to 75 microns, for example (20-75) microns. No chemical analysis of this explosive mixture was necessary prior to using it.

It is anticipated that other alkaline earth or alkali deuterides would work in place of calcium deuteride because their primary function is to fix the deuterium in the mixture. Similarly, some other transition metals have catalytic properties and would work in place of manganese.

FIG.1shows a successful embodiment of the explosive which was compressed and demonstrated a powerful explosion. The compression was carried out by a process consisting of a case-hardened steel bearing rod2with shoulder3, to be pressed through a shaped steel sleeve4containing a ring of the said explosive1. (Rod diameter is approximately 18 mm and shoulder diameter 20 mm). Approximately 80 mg of the explosive powder was put around the case-hardened steel bearing rod under the shoulder which served to compress the explosive as it was pushed through the shaped sleeve. A press-fit between rod and sleeve was specified to contain the explosive gases. Upon applying around 20 tons of downward force within a hydraulic bench press, some shear occurred within the explosive powder ring compacted under the shoulder and this initiated a fiery loud explosion which broke many pieces off the rod shoulder and even melted the nearby surface in places. This fracturing then allowed the generated explosion gas pressure of up to 60 tons per square centimeter to subside. Explosive residue of black manganese phosphide was present and the acrid odour of phosphine gas was very intense.FIG.2shows line drawings and photographs of two typical rods2with broken shoulders3, which indicate that extreme pressure pulses must have been generated to do such damage on bearing steel. The originally shiny steel surface was scorched and eroded all around. After extracting the rod from the steel sleeve, inspection of the sleeve interior revealed a melted burnt appearance. It was found that an explosion could not be initiated by the compression until some shear occurred in the explosive mixture which generated localized hot-spots in the shear-plane. Control experiments, using inert chalk powder rather than explosive powder, never produced any sign of fiery reaction or steel failure. That is, the hardened steel rod shoulder was not fractured just because of the applied high load stress.

FIG.3shows a best mode embodiment of the explosion process in which approximately 40 mg of the said explosive powder1was put in a compression cell consisting of two hardened steel roller bearings5,6, in a steel sleeve7with a solder ring seal8to contain the explosive powder1and generated gases. (Roller bearing diameter is approximately 10 mm and length 10 mm). In the hydraulic bench press it was subjected to a pressure of 25 tons per square centimeter in order to form a solid pellet of the explosive1. The compression force was then removed and a thin steel (5 degree) wedge placed under the cell. As applied pressure was resumed, some shear then occurred within the pressurized explosive pellet, and loud explosive ignition occurred at a localized hot-spot within the said shear-plane.FIG.4illustrates line drawing representations and photographs of two separate examples, wherein the explosion gas pressure measured at around 60 tons per square centimeter was great enough over a surface area of (1 mm×4 mm) to create a cutting wedge of steel6C within the lower bearing surface, which then cleaved that bearing into pieces6A,6B. The wedge shown6C was retrieved in this case. In many cases, the bearings were shattered and the explosion ceased. Explosive residue of black manganese phosphide was produced and the acrid odour of phosphine gas was always very intense. It was found that an explosion could not be initiated without some shear (due to the lower 5 deg wedge) occurring within the explosive pellet to generate localized hot-spots in the shear-plane. This meant that the hardened steel roller bearing was not simply being crushed under applied load. In the corresponding control experiments, which used a sample of inert chalk powder instead of explosive powder, no sign of bearing steel failure ever occurred.

FIG.5shows an embodiment for producing a more controlled less violent explosion using a direct hot wire effect, wherein 40 mg of the explosive1was compressed by screw10and heated by a wire13carried by ceramic-metal seals14.

The three embodiments described above are best examples taken from a number of experiments and are not intended to restrict the scope of the invention in any way. Such embodiments were developed as experimentally controllable and repeatable, designed with a view to comparing the efficacy of different chemical mixtures by producing explosions safely on a small scale. Lesser quantities of the explosive mixture than those given (below 40 mg and below 20 mg) were found not to work as well because it is necessary to get an avalanche chain reaction from the ignition hotspot in the shear plane of the explosive. On the other hand, a number of experiments were performed with larger quantities of the explosive (150 mg and 80 mg, respectively) which violently damaged the hydraulic compression jack. A few experiments with unequal proportions of the deuteride, phosphorus and manganese (e.g. 1:2:1) in the mixture showed varying degrees of success. In future commercial application, it is expected that a large quantity of explosive could be ignited with a detonator to produce an exponentially stronger explosion.

This invention relates to making a prescribed explosive mixture.

Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.