Patent ID: 12234158

BEST MODE

The present disclosure will now be described more specifically with reference to the following embodiments. It is to be noted that the following descriptions of preferred embodiments of this invention are presented herein for purpose of illustration and description only. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to be limited to the precise form disclosed.

In the embodiments below, particle precursors with anion-changed core-shell structures will be prepared after a co-precipitation reaction, and the solution volume where the reaction takes place is defined as a precipitation zone.

The method for preparing such anion-changed core-shell structured particle precursors includes the following steps: firstly, vacuuming the precipitation zone and/or filling with He, N2or Ar gas, for example, blanketing or bubbling the precipitation zone by He, N2or Ar gas.

Next, introducing a stream (b) into a reactor for providing precipitating anions, feeding stream (a) for providing transitional-metal cations simultaneously, whereby the precipitating anions and the transitional-metal cations reacting to form a precipitated particle slurry; the stream (b) includes at least a first anion composition B1and a second anion composition B2, the first anion composition B1is switched to the second anion composition B2at a first switching time between the time the co-precipitation starts and the time the reaction ends, the stream (a) includes at least one cation composition; filtering, washing and drying the precipitated particle slurry to yield the particle precursor.

Optionally, additional streams (e . . . z) may also be introduced into the precipitation zone to add additional species to the reaction, or to remove solvent through an in-situ thickening device.

Further, mixing the active particle precursors with a lithium source to form a mixture, and calcining to yield cathode active particles. During such calcination, lithiation reaction occurred and water removed from the mixture.

Each precipitation zone volume is defined as the volume of a single mixed vessel or the sum of several processing vessels, pumps, or solid-liquid thickening devices connected in parallel.

The precipitation zone can generally be described by the following mass balance equation: d(ρcV)/dt=Σα=azFαρα, where “α” represents for the inlet/outlet streams (a) to (z), “ρα” represents for a fluid density, “V” refers to a volume of the precipitation zone, “Fα” refers to a flowrate of the volumetric, “ρα” is a density of inlet streams; “ρc” is a density of accumulating fluid in the reactor which changes with time.

In one embodiment, only one precipitation zone is used, and the co-precipitation reactions occur during batch operation, the mass balance equation is defined as d(ρcV)/dt≠0.

In another embodiment, multiple precipitation zones are linked in series, d(ρcV)/dt≠0. In still another embodiment, multiple precipitation zones are linked in series, d(ρcV)/dt=0.

In the present disclosure, the cathode active particles are concentration gradient materials produced by a co-precipitation reaction, size of the cathode active particles is proportional to the reaction time, and the composition deposited onto a particle at a particular time is directly related to the inlet ion compositions.

In the process of the present disclosure, the stream (b) includes at least one anion composition Bifor precipitation with a concentration of 0.001-14 (mol anion/L) and includes at least one species selected from the group consisting of NaOH, Na2CO3, NaHCO3, Na2C2O4, LiOH, Li2CO3, LiHCO3, Li2C2O4, KOH, K2CO3, KHCO3, K2C2O4or some combination of the species listed above. Meanwhile, the stream (b) functions to provide anions which would enter the precipitation particles. Further, the stream (b) includes more than one species. In one embodiment, the stream (b) at least includes two species, i.e., a first anion composition B1and a second anion composition B2, at a particular time t, the stream (b) changes from the first anion composition B1to the second anion composition B2. Because of this, the anions deposited into the particle slurry would be suddenly changed with different anions.

For example, in one embodiment, the stream (b) has an initial anion composition, i.e., the first composition B1. As the reaction time proceeds, the stream (b) changes from the first anion composition B1to the second anion composition B2at a first switching time t, where the switching time t exists between the time the co-precipitation starts and the time the reaction ends. In detail, in one embodiment, the first anion composition B1is a solution entirely configured from hydroxide salts. In one embodiment, the second anion composition B2is at least one selected from the group consisting of carbonate ([CO3] salts), oxalate ([C2O4] salts), hydroxide ([OH] salts), or some combination of the species listed above.

In one embodiment, the first switching time t when switching the first anion composition B1to the second composition B2is greater than 50% of the reaction time. In another embodiment, the first switching time t when switching the first composition B1to the second composition B2is after 75% of the reaction time.

Besides, the flowrate and concentration of the stream (b) may be constant or may change during the reaction. In one embodiment, the flowrate and concentration change may occur at the same first switching time t when the first anion composition B1is changed to the second anion composition B2during the co-precipitation.

For example, in one embodiment, the first composition B1is sodium hydroxide to provide hydroxide needed in the particles, the second composition B2is sodium carbonate functions to provide carbonate needed in the particles. At half of the total reaction time, the first composition B1is changed into the second composition B2.

In the present disclosure, stream (a) above functions to provide transitional-metal cations. Stream (a) has at least one cation composition species. In one embodiment, stream (a) has s first cation composition A1and a second composition A2. Stream (a) includes the cations for precipitation with a concentration from 0.001-6 (mol cation/L). The cations provided by stream (a) is at least one selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Al or some combination of the species listed above. The anion provided by stream (a) is in a form of sulfate, carbonate, chloride, nitrate, fluoride, oxide, hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, oxalate, carboxylate or acetate, phosphate or borate. For example, in one embodiment, stream (a) is Ni:Mn:Co 4:3:3 metal salt. In another embodiment, the stream includes Ni:Co:Mn 4:4:2 metal hydroxide and Ni:Co 9:1 metal salt.

In one embodiment, stream (a) has a first cation composition A1at the start of the reaction, the first cation composition A1acts as an initial cation composition and has certain concentration. As the reaction time proceeds, the composition changes from the first cation composition A1to a second cation composition A2at a second switching time t, where t exists between the time the co-precipitation starts and the time the reaction ends.

In one embodiment, the cation composition changes from the first composition A1to the second composition A2gradually as a gradient with time. In another embodiment, the cation composition changes from the first composition A1to the second composition A2abruptly, as a core-shell interface. The second switching time when A1switches to A2can occur at any moment. In one embodiment, the time when the cation composition switches from the first composition A1to the second composition A2does not coincide with the time when the anion composition change from B1to B2.

In one embodiment, A1=A2. In this embodiment, there is only one stream of cation composition fed into the reactor from the beginning to the end. For example, in one embodiment, only a solution of Ni:Co 90:10 metal sulfate solution is fed into the reactor. At this circumstance, there is only Ni, Co cations exists in the whole particle. As an example,FIG.1shows a schematic view of the structure of the cathode active particles.FIG.1shows that the particle precursor has a core-shell structure, wherein the anion core B1(e.g., hydroxide) is in the center, and the anion shell B2(e.g., carbonate) enwrapped the anion core B1, and the particle has a uniform cation composition A.

In another embodiment, the cation composition changes from the first composition A1to the second composition A2for feeding different transitional-metal combinations will occur at the same time when the anion composition changes from the first composition B1to the second composition B2for feeding different anions deposited into the active particles. In this embodiment, since the cation composition and the anion composition changes at the same time, the deposited active particles would have a core-shell structure, the core of the particle includes the first cation composition A1and the first anion composition B1, and the shell of the particle enwraps around the core and includes the second cation composition A2and the second anion composition B2.FIG.2shows a schematic view of the particle precursor where the first cation A1and the first anion B1is in the core, and the second cation A2and the second anion B2is in the shell.

Further, the first cation composition A1and the second cation composition A2has a cation ratio of NixMnyCozMe1-x-y-z, where x+y+z≥0.9, z≤0.2, and “Me” refers to one or more additional metal elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Cu and Al. In one embodiment, z<0.05. In another embodiment, z=0. In another embodiment, “Me” is Al, Mg, Zr, Ti or some combination of the species listed above.

Under the feed conditions discussed above, a precipitated active particle will be collected after time tf, the active particle is expressed as (NixMnyCOzMe1-x-y-z)(CO3)a(OH)2-2awhere x+y+z≥0.9, z≤0.2, 0≤a≤1, “Me” is additional metal elements except Ni, Mn and Co, such as Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Cu and Al.

In some embodiments, the first cation composition A1and the second cation composition A2are different. In such embodiments, the first cation composition A1has a cation ratio of NixMnyCozMe1-x-y-z, where x+y+z≥0.9, 0.75≤x≤1; 0≤z≤0.1, “Me” refers to one or more additional metal elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Cu and Al. The second cation composition A2has a cation ratio of NixMnyCozMe1-x-y-z, where x+y+z≥0.9, 0.3≤x≤0.7; 0.25≤y≤0.5, “Me” refers to one or more additional metal elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Cu and Al.

In one embodiment, by changing the composition of stream (a), cation composition would be changed continuously for all or part of the material, thus forming a cathode whose cation is made of concentration gradient transitional-metals. In one embodiment, the transitional-metals, i.e., the cations, change during the whole process for preparing the entire particle. In another embodiment, only a portion of the particle make linear gradient shell transitional-metal particles with a core-shell anion species, others remain same. In still another embodiment, only a portion of the particle make non-linear gradient shell transitional-metal particles with a core-shell anion species. In yet another embodiment, only a portion of the particle make multi-slope gradient shell transitional-metal particles with a core-shell anion species. In still another embodiment, only a portion of the particle make core-gradient shell transitional-metal particles with a core-shell anion species. In yet another embodiment, only a portion of the particle make core-gradient-shell transition metal particles with a core-shell anion species.

In some embodiments, to yield the full concentration gradient or core-gradient shell particle, the transitional-metal feed, i.e., the stream which provides the first cation composition A1and the second cation composition A2has a cation ratio of NixMnyCozMe1-x-y-z, where x+y+z≥0.9, z≤0.2, “Me” refers to one or more additional metal elements selected from the group consisting of Mg, Ca, Zr, Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Cu and Al, the first cation composition A1is selected from 0.85≤x≤1; 0≤z≤0.1, the second cation composition A2is selected from 0.4≤x≤0.7; 0.25≤y≤0.5.

In one embodiment, the key processing points for the cation composition, the start of gradient in core-gradient shell particles or the change in slope for multi-slope cathode particles can occur at any time during the particle process. In this embodiment, the switching from the first cation composition A1to the second cation composition A2does not keep step with the switching from the first anion composition B1to the second anion composition B2.FIG.3shows a schematic view of the particle precursor. Such particle precursor is produced by a method wherein the first anion composition B1is switched to the second anion composition B2at a time different from that switching the first cation composition A1to the second cation composition A2. Hence, for the anions and the cations, the interface of the anions B1and B2does not coincide with the interface of the cations A1and A2.

In another embodiment, as shown inFIG.4, for the anions B1and B2, since B1is switched to B2at certain time, there is a clear interface of B1to B2in the particle. For the cations, since the cation A1is initiated at the beginning and the cation A1is gradually switched to A2during the whole process, there is no clear interface between A1and A2in the particle.

In one embodiment, the core-gradient shell initiates the concentration gradient when B1switches to B2. In another embodiment, the slope change for multi-slope gradient particles undergoes the change when B1equals B2.

The stream (ei. . . zi) includes additional solvents, surface acting agents or de-foaming agents. For example, the solvent is at least one selected from ethanol, isopropanol, ionic liquids and so on. The surface acting agents may be alky sulfates such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), alkyl trimethyl ammonia species such as cetyltrimethyl ammonia (CTAB), glycols, glycerides. The de-foaming agent is ethanol.

In one embodiment, dopant is also fed into the reactor. The dopant refers to salts of metal elements other than Ni, Co and Mn, labeled as “Me”. In one embodiment, the dopant species is Al2(SO4)3. As a dopant element, Al3+would be precipitated together with other cations. Since different cations suit for different pH conditions, adjusting the pH affects would be inevitable. This would lead to the adjusting to Ksp, and the Ksp of different anions would form different precipitates. Hence, it can be selected by using different pH to match with suitable anion precipitation. Other dopants could also be used if the pH is suitable.

The pH of each precipitation zone is maintained at a range of 7-13. In one embodiment, the pH is at a range of 9.5-12.5 when precipitating hydroxides and at a range of 7-10 when precipitating carbonates.

The precipitation zone agitated vessel is well mixed during the feeding, and has a Re>6,400, with a mixing time from 0 to 1,200 seconds. In one embodiment, the mixing time is 0 to 120 seconds. In another embodiment, the mixing time is 0 to 45 seconds. The precipitation zone temperature is maintained between 30 and 800° C. In one embodiment, the precipitation zone temperature is maintained between 45 and 600° C.

Table 1 shows the solubility product constant (Ksp) of carbonate and hydroxide materials. As can be seen from table 1 that the solubility product constant (Ksp) of carbonate is larger than that of hydroxide. Theoretically, more hydroxide materials precipitate than the carbonate materials under the same pH. The Kspand pH are usually two main factors determining the solubility of a substance. In table 1, “(II)” means a valence of the metal element in the precipitation is divalent.

TABLE 1Solubility Product Constants near 25° C.Ionic CompoundKspIonic CompoundKspAluminum1.3 × 10−33AluminumN/Ahydroxidecarbonate(not stable)Cobalt(II)1.6 × 10−15Cobalt(II)1.4 × 10−13hydroxidecarbonateMagnesium1.8 × 10−11Magnesium3.5 × 10−8hydroxidecarbonateManganese(II)1.9 × 10−13Manganese(II)1.8 × 10−11hydroxidecarbonateNickel(II)2.0 × 10−15Nickel(II)6.6 × 10−9hydroxidecarbonate

In another embodiment, the pH is constant from 9-10.5 regardless of the anion species being fed for the co-precipitation. In such embodiment, both the first anion composition B1and the second anion composition B2have a pH at a range of 9-10.5. In some embodiments, the pH changes when the anion composition changes from B1to B2. For example, the pH changes when hydroxide is switched to carbonate, since the first anion composition B1is hydroxide which has a pH of 10-14, and the second anion composition B2is carbonate which has a pH much lower.

In some embodiments, the pH gradually changes during the course of the entire reaction, or for a specified duration of the reaction.

After sufficient time till the precipitation ends, the precipitation particles are deposited from the precipitation zone to from a particle slurry, which is collected in a hold-up tank or directly fed to a solid-liquid filtration device to obtain precipitated particles. The filtration device may be a plate and frame filter, candlestick filter, centrifuge, vacuum drum filter, pressure drum filter, hydrocyclone, nutsche filter, clarifier or some combination of devices. Next, the filtered precipitated particles (i.e., the filter cake) are washed to remove byproduct salts from the precipitation reactions.

And then, the precipitated particles are dried under vacuum at an atmosphere of N2, Ar or air for 3-24 hours between 80-200° C., thus forming a precipitated particles precursor.

Once dried, the precipitated particles precursor is contacted and well mixed with a lithium source to form a mixture. The lithium source is selected from lithium hydroxide (i.e., LiOH), LiOH·H2O, lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), LiNO3, lithium acetate, lithium metal or Li2O. In one embodiment, the lithium source is lithium hydroxide. In another embodiment, the lithium source is lithium carbonate.

In one embodiment, a mole ratio between Li from the lithium source and the metal cation from stream (a) is in a range of 0.5-1.5. In another embodiment, the mole ratio is 0.9-1.15. In still another embodiment, the mole ratio is 1.01-1.10.

After the lithium source and the precipitated particles precursor are mixed uniformly to form a mixture, calcine the mixture under a temperature of 300-950° C., wherein multiple hold temperatures and ramp rates may be used. For example, firstly controlling the temperature at 300-500° C. for 2-20 hours, and then raising temperature to 700-850° C. and maintaining for 2-20 hours. The ramp rate during heating is from 0.5 to 10 degrees per minute. In another embodiment, the ramp rate during heating is 2-5 degrees per minute. The calcination time is from 2 hours to 48 hours.

During calcination in the method above, water may generate between 0-800° C. during the calcining step. Since during calcination, the precursors underwent decomposition and/or oxidation to yield the expected products, the cathode active particles. During the calcining step, the following reaction occurred based on formulas 1-3, wherein M(OH)2, M(CO3) and M(C2O4) are the precipitated particles from the solution, M refers to metals:
M(OH)2=MOx+H2O  (formula 1)
M(CO3)=MOx+CO/CO2(formula 2)
M(C2O4)=MOx+CO/CO2(formula 3).

Tables 2 and 3 show moles of water evolved from calcination of 1 mol of M(OH)2/MCO3precursor (i.e., lithiation process) when using different lithium source. We can get that while the exact water release is complicated by the choice of lithium source, it is apparent that hydroxide precursor particles will generate water while carbonate and oxalate anion presence will result in some carbon-oxide species.

TABLE 2Moles of water evolved from calcination of 1 molM(OH)2/MCO3precursor when the lithium source is LiOH•H2O1 molcathodeM(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3precursorM(OH)2MCO3(1:1)(1:1)(1:1)(1:1)lithiationWater evolved from calcination (mol)90%2.25 mol1.35 mol1.80 mol1.95 mol2.03 mol2.07 mol100%2.50 mol1.50 mol2.00 mol2.17 mol2.25 mol2.30 mol103%2.58 mol1.55 mol2.06 mol2.23 mol2.32 mol2.37 mol110%2.75 mol1.65 mol2.20 mol2.38 mol2.48 mol2.53 mol120%3.00 mol1.80 mol2.40 mol2.60 mol2.70 mol2.76 mol130%3.25 mol1.95 mol2.60 mol2.82 mol2.93 mol2.99 mol

TABLE 3Moles of water evolved from calcination of 1 molM(OH)2/MCO3precursor when the lithium source is Li2CO31 molcathodeM(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3M(OH)2/MCO3precursorM(OH)2MCO3(1:1)(1:1)(1:1)(1:1)lithiationWater evolved from calcination (mol)90%0.90 mol0.00 mol0.45 mol0.60 mol0.68 mol0.72 mol100%1.00 mol0.00 mol0.50 mol0.67 mol0.75 mol0.80 mol103%1.03 mol0.00 mol0.52 mol0.69 mol0.77 mol0.82 mol110%1.10 mol0.00 mol0.55 mol0.73 mol0.83 mol0.88 mol120%1.20 mol0.00 mol0.60 mol0.80 mol0.90 mol0.96 mol130%1.30 mol0.00 mol0.65 mol0.87 mol0.98 mol1.04 mol

The content of water evolved from the cathode particle precursor and Li precursor will be decreased when an anion composition gradient material is prepared, because instead of H2O, CO/CO2will be evolved partially during the decomposition reactions, just as formulas 2 and 3 show.

The calcination is conducted under atmosphere selected from N2, air, dried air, oxygen or some combination thereof. The calcination temperature is critical for concentration gradient materials, since too high, too long, or a combo of the two may cause so much cation diffusion that a gradient is no longer present in the final cathode active particles.

To characterize and analysis the precipitated cathode active particles which have concentration gradient elements, SEM, porosimetry, pycnometer and particle size distributions can be utilized. The presence of a concentration gradient can be confirmed by depth profiling a particle or via cross-sectioning a particle and using an EDS line scan or electron microprobe analyzer.

The precipitated and cathode active particles can be characterized using the particle size distribution D10, D50, D90. The Sauter mean diameter d32can be calculated by the formula

d32=∑k=1Nnk⁢dk3∑k=1Nnk⁢dk2,
wherein “nk” is the relative fraction and “dk” is the bin diameter from the particle size distribution. The particle size distribution can be collected via a light scattering instrument. In one embodiment, the prepared cathode active particles have a Sauter mean diameter at a range of 0.5-30 μm. In another embodiment, the Sauter mean diameter is at a range of 1-15 μm.

The porosity of the prepared cathode active particles can be analyzed using BET and BJH analysis.

The prepared cathode active particles can be used in lithium-ion battery. In detail, in one embodiment, the prepared cathode active particles are mixed with a binder and conductive particles to form a mixture slurry. The mixture slurry is further cast onto a metallic foil to form a cathode electrode. The cathode electrode can be used in a lithium-ion battery.

To test the cathode material performance, galvanotactic charge-discharge tests can be performed. The material capacity, cycle retention, rate performance and cycle efficiency can all then be determined.

MODE FOR INVENTION

Example 1

FIG.6shows a schematic view of the reaction device to form the cathode active particles. As shown inFIG.6, the reaction is conducted with the following steps:

Firstly, placing a 10 L glass reactor into a jacketed stirred tank, filling the glass reactor with 0.8M ammonia hydroxide water, and starting stir at 350 rpm with a mixing shaft. Feeding nitrogen gas into the water and bubbling to deoxygenate the water, meanwhile controlling a temperature of the reactor solution at 500 C, and a pH of the reactor to 11.9.

Preparing a 1 L solution of 2M first transitional-metal sulfate solution which is made of nickel sulfate hexahydrate and cobalt sulfate heptahydrate, in which a mole ratio of Ni:Co is 90:10. Preparing a 2M second transitional-metal sulfate solution with a mole ratio of Ni:Mn:Co being 4:4:2.

Feeding the first transitional-metal sulfate solution, aqua ammonia solution, and sodium hydroxide solution into the reactor while stirring at 350 rpm and performing reaction therein. In detail, pumping the first transitional-metal sulfate solution into the reactor at a flowrate of 125 mL/hr, simultaneously pumping a 9.6M aqua ammonia solution thereinto at a flowrate of 16 mL/hr. Meanwhile, pumping a 10.6M sodium hydroxide solution into the reactor to maintain the pH at 11.9, in which the sodium hydroxide solution is pumped by a dosing pump that is in a control loop with the pH controller. The reaction lasted 8 hours.

After that, turning off the stirring, and depositing particles from the solutions. After finishing the deposition, pumping away the supernatant until only 750 mL remained in the reactor. Adding water into the reactor to form a slurry solution until a volume of the slurry solution reaching 3 L.

And then, restarting to stir the slurry solution at 350 rpm, feeding 2M sodium carbonate instead of the sodium hydroxide, and controlling the pH to change to 9 by setting the pH controller. Meanwhile, feeding the aqua ammonia solution with a concentration of 0.008M instead of 9.6M, and feeding the 2M second transitional-metal sulfate solution whose mole ratio of Ni:Mn:Co being 4:4:2 to form a mixed solution. Proceeding the reaction in the mixed solution for 8 hours, during the reaction, precipitated particles are deposited from the mixed solution. After reaction, dividing the mixed solution into two parts, one part is collected for further use in Example 2.

Filtering the other part of the mixed solution to remain the precipitated particles and washing the precipitated particles with water. Then drying the particles at 100° C. to form a particles precursor. Once dried, mixing the particles precursor with LiOH·H2O at a ratio of 1.03:1, and then calcining at 840° C. for hours to yield cathode active particles. Such particles have a core-shell structure.

Physical characterization of the cathode active particles in Example 1 was also tested. Firstly, collecting the precursor and the first cathode active particles separately by a Malvern Mastersizer 2000light scattering instrument, loading 20 g of each powder into a 25 ml graduated cylinder and tapping for 2000 taps using a PF-300B, and collecting SEM images of particles cross section on a JEOL JSM-639OLV separately.FIG.7shows SEM images of cross-sectional particles of Example 1, such SEM images can also show the element distribution (abbr. as ED) of C, O, Ni, Mn and Co. As shown inFIG.7, a core exists in each particle, such core is made of hydroxide, and having no Mn therein, while Mn is presented outside the core. The reason is that Mn correlates with carbonate anion, while at the beginning there is only sulfate anion existed in the solution. After that, carbonate anion is fed into the reaction instead of sulfate anion. Besides, the SEM images also shows that carbon was weak due to the poor scattering ability of carbon, but some regions appears to show low and higher intensity that correlate with the expected shell. The image which marked with “C” in the left top corner shows the image of carbon.

Example 2

Feeding aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3) solution into the collected part of the mixed solution wherein the Al content was 0.5 mol % of the second transitional-metal sulfate solution whose Ni:Mn:Co being 4:4:2. Reacting for another 5 hours. During this reaction, Al3+cation, together with Ni, Mn, Co cations, are also participated in the reaction with anions of the mixed solution to form precipitated particles from the solution.

After the reaction ends, filtering the solution to get the precipitated particles and washing the precipitated particles with water. Drying the precipitated particles at 100° C. to form a particle precursor. Once dried, mixing the particles precursor with LiOH·H2O at a ratio of 1.03:1, and then calcining at 840° C. for hours to yield cathode active particles.

Physical characterization of the cathode active particles in example 2 was also tested by a similar method as that in Example 1.FIG.8shows SEM images of cross-sectional particle precursors prepared in Example 2. Further, element distribution of the particles prepared in Example 2 is also analyzed through the SEM images, and table 4 shows the element distribution obtained by SEM images ofFIG.8. The last image ofFIG.8shows the element distribution of Al.

TABLE 4Element distribution of C, O, Ni, Mn and Co.ElementCOAlMnCoNiWeight %10.6435.313.5720.7110.2019.57Atomic %21.5553.723.229.174.218.11

It can be seen that there is a strong presence of Al not entering the core of the particles, which is mainly located at the outer shell of the particles. Besides, the density of the particles is uneven due to depth effects during the scanning.

In this example, the aluminum sulfate, especially the Al3+acts as a dopant. During co-precipitation, Al3+can be added to the cathode particle precursor under the condition without using an additional organic chelating additive to slow the precipitation kinetics. The cathode particle can be Ni-rich material wherein a ratio of Ni to transition metal ratio is larger than 0.7. Further, the cathode particle still has the Al dopant without using of an organic chelating additive. The deposition of the Al3+into the particle can adjust the thickness and depth based upon the switching point for feeding the anions and for feeding Al3+.

This shows that dopants incompatible with the core anion transitional-metal species in the processing conditions can be easily added to the precursor particles in the shell. And vice versa, where dopants that are only compatible with the core anion under processing conditions can be added to the particle before switching to an incompatible processing location for the shell. Because of this, the particle precursors are formed to have core-shell structure, and the core and shell have different colors and there is an interface between the core and the shell.

Comparative Example 1

Firstly, loading 2 L of 0.9M aqua ammonia solution into a 5 L jacketed glass reactor whose temperature set at 50° C. Stirring the solution at 500 rpm, and bubbling by nitrogen.

Preparing a 2M third transitional-metal sulfate solution by feeding nickel sulfate hexahydrate, cobalt sulfate heptahydrate, manganese sulfate monohydrate and aluminum sulfate hydrate, in which a mole ratio of Ni:Co:Mn:Al being 70:10:10:10. Feeding the third transitional-metal sulfate solution into the reactor at a flowrate of 150 mL/hr, simultaneously feeding 5M aqua ammonia solution into the reactor at 45 mL/hr. Meanwhile, feeding 4M sodium hydroxide solution into the reactor to maintain the pH at 11.9.

After the reaction finished, filtering and washing the solution with water. In this way, cathode active particles are prepared.

Physical characterization of the cathode active particles in example 2 was also tested by a similar method as that in Example 1.FIG.9shows SEM images of cross-sectional particles prepared in comparative example 1. As shown inFIG.9, no spherical particles were formed during the reaction, and the solution was very difficult to filter, almost impossible. This indicates that there were excessive fines formed during the reaction, in which the fines are mainly strong nucleation of aluminum hydroxide species. No core-shell structure is formed in comparative example 1.

Electrochemical Characterization:

Preparing coin cells to test the electrochemical characterization of cathode active particles prepared in Example 1 and 2. Firstly, mixing 90 wt % of the prepared cathode active particles in Examples 1 or 2 separately, 5 wt % Super P and 5 wt % PVDF in NMP solvent (N-Methyl pyrrolidone) to form a cathode slurry. Next, casting the cathode slurry onto an aluminum foil using a notched blade. Once dried, pressing to a thickness of 60 μm to yield a cell. Punching several such cells into 13 mm disks to form coin cells with a lithium foil anode and a 1M LiPF6EC/DEC electrolyte. After that, sealing the cells.

The sealed cells are evaluated on a Neware tester from 2.7-4.4V at 20 mA/g for cycles 1-3, at 66 mA/g for cycles 3-5, and at 200 mA/g for cycles 6 above, except for check cycles done periodically at 20 mAh/g.FIG.10shows the discharging capacity and cycle performance of the comparison between the cells prepared with the active particles in Examples 1 and 2. InFIG.10the cathode particles of Example 1 and Example 2 are compared for their cycle performance. The comparison shows that example 2 shows a better cycle performance and a better discharging capacity due to the further addition of Al into the solution.

One skilled in the art could understand that the reaction device used in the present disclosure can be various.FIGS.11-15shows examples of different reaction devices which could be used in the present disclosure.

While the invention has been described in terms of what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention needs not be limited to the disclosed embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims which are to be accorded with the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The method of the present disclosure can prepare transitional-metal particle precursor and cathode active particles under co-precipitation reaction. The particle precursor has a core-shell structure, the core and the shell are made of different anions. Such cathode active particle can be used to prepare cathode of lithium-ion battery.