Method for coordinating driving maneuvers between motor vehicles (10, 20, 30) within a common local environment, wherein each of the motor vehicles (10, 20, 30) continuously updates at least one planned driving trajectory (11, 21, 31) for an intended driving maneuver by means of a maneuver planning device of the respective motor vehicle (10, 20, 30) and communicates by means of a vehicle-to-vehicle communication device in the environment, wherein the maneuver planning devices each go through update cycles which comprise the following steps: a) retrieving planned driving trajectories of intended driving maneuvers of the other motor vehicles in the surrounding area received via the vehicle-to-vehicle communication device; b) comparing the received planned travel trajectories with one's own planned travel trajectory and determining whether there is a conflict between one's own planned travel trajectory and the received planned travel trajectories; c) determining, if a conflict was determined during the comparison of driving trajectories between the vehicle's own planned driving trajectory and one of the received planned driving trajectories of another motor vehicle, a privileged motor vehicle (20; 30) which is privileged to carry out an intended driving maneuver according to its conflicting planned driving trajectory (21; 31), and a non-privileged motor vehicle (10; 20) which is not privileged to carry out an intended driving maneuver according to its conflicting planned driving trajectory (11; 21); d) determining a number of potential cooperation trajectories by a maneuver planning device of a privileged motor vehicle (20; 30) which are free of conflict with the planned travel trajectory of the non-privileged motor vehicle (10; 20), wherein the potential cooperation trajectories (22a, 22b, 22c; 32a, 32b, 32c) are evaluated with costs according to a cost function and in comparison to a cost limit value of the privileged motor vehicle (20; 30); characterized in that the update cycles carried out further comprise the following steps: e) checking, if a conflict check has identified a conflict between a most cost-effective cooperation trajectory from the number of potential cooperation trajectories and a received planned travel trajectory of a third motor vehicle, whether among the potential cooperation trajectories an alternative cooperation trajectory exists which is free of conflict with the planned travel trajectory of the third motor vehicle and whose costs comply with the cost limit of the privileged motor vehicle; f) transmitting, if an alternative cooperation trajectory exists, the alternative cooperation trajectory together with the most cost-effective cooperation trajectory as a pair of updated planned travel trajectories of the privileged motor vehicle. a) retrieving planned driving trajectories of intended driving maneuvers of the other motor vehicles in the surrounding area received via the vehicle-to-vehicle communication device; b) comparing the received planned travel trajectories with one's own planned travel trajectory and determining whether there is a conflict between one's own planned travel trajectory and the received planned travel trajectories; c) determining, if a conflict was determined during the comparison of driving trajectories between the vehicle's own planned driving trajectory and one of the received planned driving trajectories of another motor vehicle, a privileged motor vehicle (20; 30) which is privileged to carry out an intended driving maneuver according to its conflicting planned driving trajectory (21; 31), and a non-privileged motor vehicle (10; 20) which is not privileged to carry out an intended driving maneuver according to its conflicting planned driving trajectory (11; 21); d) determining a number of potential cooperation trajectories by a maneuver planning device of a privileged motor vehicle (20; 30) which are free of conflict with the planned travel trajectory of the non-privileged motor vehicle (10; 20), wherein the potential cooperation trajectories (22a, 22b, 22c; 32a, 32b, 32c) are evaluated with costs according to a cost function and in comparison to a cost limit value of the privileged motor vehicle (20; 30); e) checking, if a conflict check has identified a conflict between a most cost-effective cooperation trajectory from the number of potential cooperation trajectories and a received planned travel trajectory of a third motor vehicle, whether among the potential cooperation trajectories an alternative cooperation trajectory exists which is free of conflict with the planned travel trajectory of the third motor vehicle and whose costs comply with the cost limit of the privileged motor vehicle; f) transmitting, if an alternative cooperation trajectory exists, the alternative cooperation trajectory together with the most cost-effective cooperation trajectory as a pair of updated planned travel trajectories of the privileged motor vehicle.