Despite these weaknesses with regards to the study reporting and discussion, the paper is interesting and showcases good and novel work and I think the GI community would benefit from its presentation (albeit with some changes as suggested above).	['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']	paper quality