While it covers important ground , I think the arguments need more refinement and focus before they can inspire productive discussion	['non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']	paper quality