anno_start anno_end anno_text entity_type sentence section 29 45 Escherichia coli species Structural insights into the Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylases and molecular determinants of interaction with the AAA+ ATPase RavA TITLE 46 67 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Structural insights into the Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylases and molecular determinants of interaction with the AAA+ ATPase RavA TITLE 119 130 AAA+ ATPase protein_type Structural insights into the Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylases and molecular determinants of interaction with the AAA+ ATPase RavA TITLE 131 135 RavA protein Structural insights into the Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylases and molecular determinants of interaction with the AAA+ ATPase RavA TITLE 4 13 inducible protein_state The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 14 34 lysine decarboxylase protein_type The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 35 39 LdcI protein The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 56 71 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 72 99 acid stress response enzyme protein_type The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 108 112 LdcC protein The inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI is an important enterobacterial acid stress response enzyme whereas LdcC is its close paralogue thought to play mainly a metabolic role. ABSTRACT 43 51 decamers oligomeric_state A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 59 75 Escherichia coli species A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 76 80 LdcI protein A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 90 98 hexamers oligomeric_state A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 106 117 AAA+ ATPase protein_type A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 118 122 RavA protein A unique macromolecular cage formed by two decamers of the Escherichia coli LdcI and five hexamers of the AAA+ ATPase RavA was shown to counteract acid stress under starvation. ABSTRACT 26 44 pseudoatomic model evidence Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 52 61 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 80 104 cryo-electron microscopy experimental_method Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 105 108 map evidence Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 113 131 crystal structures evidence Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 138 146 inactive protein_state Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 147 151 LdcI protein Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 152 159 decamer oligomeric_state Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 166 170 RavA protein Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 171 178 monomer oligomeric_state Previously, we proposed a pseudoatomic model of the LdcI-RavA cage based on its cryo-electron microscopy map and crystal structures of an inactive LdcI decamer and a RavA monomer. ABSTRACT 15 39 cryo-electron microscopy experimental_method We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 40 58 3D reconstructions evidence We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 66 73 E. coli species We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 74 78 LdcI protein We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 83 87 LdcC protein We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 96 108 improved map evidence We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 116 120 LdcI protein We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 121 129 bound to protein_state We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 134 145 LARA domain structure_element We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 149 153 RavA protein We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 158 168 pH optimal protein_state We now present cryo-electron microscopy 3D reconstructions of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC, and an improved map of the LdcI bound to the LARA domain of RavA, at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity. ABSTRACT 0 10 Comparison experimental_method Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 46 56 structures evidence Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 86 90 LdcI protein Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 95 99 LdcC protein Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 124 151 acid stress response enzyme protein_type Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 174 178 RavA protein Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 234 246 pH-dependent protein_state Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 278 282 RavA protein Comparison with each other and with available structures uncovers differences between LdcI and LdcC explaining why only the acid stress response enzyme is capable of binding RavA. We identify interdomain movements associated with the pH-dependent enzyme activation and with the RavA binding. ABSTRACT 0 27 Multiple sequence alignment experimental_method Multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis reveals that certain enterobacteria exert evolutionary pressure on the lysine decarboxylase towards the cage-like assembly with RavA, implying that this complex may have an important function under particular stress conditions. ABSTRACT 41 62 phylogenetic analysis experimental_method Multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis reveals that certain enterobacteria exert evolutionary pressure on the lysine decarboxylase towards the cage-like assembly with RavA, implying that this complex may have an important function under particular stress conditions. ABSTRACT 84 98 enterobacteria taxonomy_domain Multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis reveals that certain enterobacteria exert evolutionary pressure on the lysine decarboxylase towards the cage-like assembly with RavA, implying that this complex may have an important function under particular stress conditions. ABSTRACT 134 154 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis reveals that certain enterobacteria exert evolutionary pressure on the lysine decarboxylase towards the cage-like assembly with RavA, implying that this complex may have an important function under particular stress conditions. ABSTRACT 191 195 RavA protein Multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis reveals that certain enterobacteria exert evolutionary pressure on the lysine decarboxylase towards the cage-like assembly with RavA, implying that this complex may have an important function under particular stress conditions. ABSTRACT 0 15 Enterobacterial taxonomy_domain Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 16 25 inducible protein_state Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 26 40 decarboxylases protein_type Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 44 49 basic protein_state Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 50 61 amino acids chemical Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 62 68 lysine residue_name Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 70 78 arginine residue_name Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 83 92 ornithine residue_name Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 145 153 α-family protein_type Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 157 179 pyridoxal-5′-phosphate chemical Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 181 184 PLP chemical Enterobacterial inducible decarboxylases of basic amino acids lysine, arginine and ornithine have a common evolutionary origin and belong to the α-family of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. INTRO 47 56 bacterium taxonomy_domain They counteract acid stress experienced by the bacterium in the host digestive and urinary tract, and in particular in the extremely acidic stomach. INTRO 5 18 decarboxylase protein_type Each decarboxylase is induced by an excess of the target amino acid and a specific range of extracellular pH, and works in conjunction with a cognate inner membrane antiporter. INTRO 57 67 amino acid chemical Each decarboxylase is induced by an excess of the target amino acid and a specific range of extracellular pH, and works in conjunction with a cognate inner membrane antiporter. INTRO 150 175 inner membrane antiporter protein_type Each decarboxylase is induced by an excess of the target amino acid and a specific range of extracellular pH, and works in conjunction with a cognate inner membrane antiporter. INTRO 23 33 amino acid chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 41 50 polyamine chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 69 72 PLP chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 134 140 proton chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 156 159 CO2 chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 216 225 polyamine chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 245 255 antiporter protein_type Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 278 288 amino acid chemical Decarboxylation of the amino acid into a polyamine is catalysed by a PLP cofactor in a multistep reaction that consumes a cytoplasmic proton and produces a CO2 molecule passively diffusing out of the cell, while the polyamine is excreted by the antiporter in exchange for a new amino acid substrate. INTRO 44 53 bacterial taxonomy_domain Consequently, these enzymes buffer both the bacterial cytoplasm and the local extracellular environment. INTRO 6 31 amino acid decarboxylases protein_type These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 65 74 inducible protein_state These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 78 92 biodegradative protein_state These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 124 136 biosynthetic protein_state These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 137 171 lysine and ornithine decarboxylase protein_type These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 234 243 polyamine chemical These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 258 268 neutral pH protein_state These amino acid decarboxylases are therefore called acid stress inducible or biodegradative to distinguish them from their biosynthetic lysine and ornithine decarboxylase paralogs catalysing the same reaction but responsible for the polyamine production at neutral pH. INTRO 0 9 Inducible protein_state Inducible enterobacterial amino acid decarboxylases have been intensively studied since the early 1940 because the ability of bacteria to withstand acid stress can be linked to their pathogenicity in humans. INTRO 10 25 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain Inducible enterobacterial amino acid decarboxylases have been intensively studied since the early 1940 because the ability of bacteria to withstand acid stress can be linked to their pathogenicity in humans. INTRO 26 51 amino acid decarboxylases protein_type Inducible enterobacterial amino acid decarboxylases have been intensively studied since the early 1940 because the ability of bacteria to withstand acid stress can be linked to their pathogenicity in humans. INTRO 126 134 bacteria taxonomy_domain Inducible enterobacterial amino acid decarboxylases have been intensively studied since the early 1940 because the ability of bacteria to withstand acid stress can be linked to their pathogenicity in humans. INTRO 200 206 humans species Inducible enterobacterial amino acid decarboxylases have been intensively studied since the early 1940 because the ability of bacteria to withstand acid stress can be linked to their pathogenicity in humans. INTRO 19 28 inducible protein_state In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 29 49 lysine decarboxylase protein_type In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 50 54 LdcI protein In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 59 63 CadA protein In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 95 109 broad pH range protein_state In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 184 198 enterobacteria taxonomy_domain In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 207 246 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium species In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 248 263 Vibrio cholerae species In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 268 285 Vibrio vulnificus species In particular, the inducible lysine decarboxylase LdcI (or CadA) attracts attention due to its broad pH range of activity and its capacity to promote survival and growth of pathogenic enterobacteria such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus under acidic conditions. INTRO 18 22 LdcI protein Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 31 43 biosynthetic protein_state Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 44 64 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 65 69 LdcC protein Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 73 103 uropathogenic Escherichia coli species Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 105 109 UPEC species Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 219 231 nitric oxide chemical Furthermore, both LdcI and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylase LdcC of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) appear to play an important role in increased resistance of this pathogen to nitrosative stress produced by nitric oxide and other damaging reactive nitrogen intermediates accumulating during the course of urinary tract infections (UTI). INTRO 29 39 cadaverine chemical This effect is attributed to cadaverine, the diamine produced by decarboxylation of lysine by LdcI and LdcC, that was shown to enhance UPEC colonisation of the bladder. INTRO 84 90 lysine residue_name This effect is attributed to cadaverine, the diamine produced by decarboxylation of lysine by LdcI and LdcC, that was shown to enhance UPEC colonisation of the bladder. INTRO 94 98 LdcI protein This effect is attributed to cadaverine, the diamine produced by decarboxylation of lysine by LdcI and LdcC, that was shown to enhance UPEC colonisation of the bladder. INTRO 103 107 LdcC protein This effect is attributed to cadaverine, the diamine produced by decarboxylation of lysine by LdcI and LdcC, that was shown to enhance UPEC colonisation of the bladder. INTRO 135 139 UPEC species This effect is attributed to cadaverine, the diamine produced by decarboxylation of lysine by LdcI and LdcC, that was shown to enhance UPEC colonisation of the bladder. INTRO 17 29 biosynthetic protein_state In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 30 37 E. coli species In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 38 58 lysine decarboxylase protein_type In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 59 63 LdcC protein In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 172 188 fluoroquinolones chemical In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 212 216 RpoS protein In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 260 270 cadaverine chemical In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 293 300 E. coli species In addition, the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylase LdcC, long thought to be constitutively expressed in low amounts, was demonstrated to be strongly upregulated by fluoroquinolones via their induction of RpoS. A direct correlation between the level of cadaverine and the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics commonly used as a first-line treatment of UTI could be established. INTRO 5 12 acid pH protein_state Both acid pH and cadaverine induce closure of outer membrane porins thereby contributing to bacterial protection from acid stress, but also from certain antibiotics, by reduction in membrane permeability. INTRO 17 27 cadaverine chemical Both acid pH and cadaverine induce closure of outer membrane porins thereby contributing to bacterial protection from acid stress, but also from certain antibiotics, by reduction in membrane permeability. INTRO 61 67 porins protein_type Both acid pH and cadaverine induce closure of outer membrane porins thereby contributing to bacterial protection from acid stress, but also from certain antibiotics, by reduction in membrane permeability. INTRO 92 101 bacterial taxonomy_domain Both acid pH and cadaverine induce closure of outer membrane porins thereby contributing to bacterial protection from acid stress, but also from certain antibiotics, by reduction in membrane permeability. INTRO 4 21 crystal structure evidence The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 29 36 E. coli species The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 37 41 LdcI protein The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 92 111 electron microscopy experimental_method The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 113 115 EM experimental_method The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 137 144 decamer oligomeric_state The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 157 167 pentameric oligomeric_state The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 168 173 rings structure_element The crystal structure of the E. coli LdcI as well as its low resolution characterisation by electron microscopy (EM) showed that it is a decamer made of two pentameric rings. INTRO 5 12 monomer oligomeric_state Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 58 69 wing domain structure_element Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 80 85 1–129 residue_range Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 90 113 PLP-binding core domain structure_element Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 124 131 130–563 residue_range Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 140 157 C-terminal domain structure_element Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 159 162 CTD structure_element Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 173 180 564–715 residue_range Each monomer is composed of three domains – an N-terminal wing domain (residues 1–129), a PLP-binding core domain (residues 130–563), and a C-terminal domain (CTD, residues 564–715). INTRO 0 8 Monomers oligomeric_state Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 37 49 core domains structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 55 73 2-fold symmetrical protein_state Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 74 80 dimers oligomeric_state Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 99 111 active sites site Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 133 166 toroidal D5-symmetrical structure structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 179 183 wing structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 188 199 core domain structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 224 236 central pore structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 247 251 CTDs structure_element Monomers tightly associate via their core domains into 2-fold symmetrical dimers with two complete active sites, and further build a toroidal D5-symmetrical structure held by the wing and core domain interactions around the central pore, with the CTDs at the periphery. INTRO 33 40 E. coli species Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 41 52 AAA+ ATPase protein_type Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 53 57 RavA protein Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 130 134 LdcI protein Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 169 173 LdcC protein Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 203 213 pentameric oligomeric_state Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 214 219 rings structure_element Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 227 231 LdcI protein Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 260 269 hexameric oligomeric_state Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 270 275 rings structure_element Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 279 283 RavA protein Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 341 350 bacterium taxonomy_domain Ten years ago we showed that the E. coli AAA+ ATPase RavA, involved in multiple stress response pathways, tightly interacted with LdcI but was not capable of binding to LdcC. We described how two double pentameric rings of the LdcI tightly associate with five hexameric rings of RavA to form a unique cage-like architecture that enables the bacterium to withstand acid stress even under conditions of nutrient deprivation eliciting stringent response. INTRO 25 45 solved the structure experimental_method Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 53 60 E. coli species Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 61 70 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 82 106 cryo-electron microscopy experimental_method Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 108 114 cryoEM experimental_method Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 141 159 crystal structures evidence Furthermore, we recently solved the structure of the E. coli LdcI-RavA complex by cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and combined it with the crystal structures of the individual proteins. INTRO 26 44 pseudoatomic model evidence This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 85 91 cryoEM experimental_method This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 92 95 map evidence This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 103 112 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 127 131 LARA structure_element This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 145 176 LdcI associating domain of RavA structure_element This allowed us to make a pseudoatomic model of the whole assembly, underpinned by a cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex (with LARA standing for LdcI associating domain of RavA), and to identify conformational rearrangements and specific elements essential for complex formation. INTRO 29 38 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 83 87 loop structure_element The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 95 106 LARA domain structure_element The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 110 114 RavA protein The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 134 141 β-sheet structure_element The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 145 149 LdcI protein The main determinants of the LdcI-RavA cage assembly appeared to be the N-terminal loop of the LARA domain of RavA and the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. INTRO 27 49 structural information evidence In spite of this wealth of structural information, the fact that LdcC does not interact with RavA, although the two lysine decarboxylases are 69% identical and 84% similar, and the physiological significance of the absence of this interaction remained unexplored. INTRO 65 69 LdcC protein In spite of this wealth of structural information, the fact that LdcC does not interact with RavA, although the two lysine decarboxylases are 69% identical and 84% similar, and the physiological significance of the absence of this interaction remained unexplored. INTRO 93 97 RavA protein In spite of this wealth of structural information, the fact that LdcC does not interact with RavA, although the two lysine decarboxylases are 69% identical and 84% similar, and the physiological significance of the absence of this interaction remained unexplored. INTRO 116 137 lysine decarboxylases protein_type In spite of this wealth of structural information, the fact that LdcC does not interact with RavA, although the two lysine decarboxylases are 69% identical and 84% similar, and the physiological significance of the absence of this interaction remained unexplored. INTRO 84 90 cryoEM experimental_method To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 91 105 reconstruction evidence To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 109 113 LdcC protein To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 149 153 LdcI protein To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 158 167 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 168 178 structures evidence To solve this discrepancy, in the present work we provided a three-dimensional (3D) cryoEM reconstruction of LdcC and compared it with the available LdcI and LdcI-RavA structures. INTRO 15 19 LdcI protein Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 20 38 crystal structures evidence Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 56 63 high pH protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 84 92 inactive protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 94 99 LdcIi protein Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 101 107 pH 8.5 protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 122 128 cryoEM experimental_method Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 129 144 reconstructions evidence Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 148 157 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 162 171 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 185 202 acidic pH optimal protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 279 296 3D reconstruction evidence Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 304 308 LdcI protein Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 312 321 active pH protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 323 328 LdcIa protein Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 330 336 pH 6.2 protein_state Given that the LdcI crystal structures were obtained at high pH where the enzyme is inactive (LdcIi, pH 8.5), whereas the cryoEM reconstructions of LdcI-RavA and LdcI-LARA were done at acidic pH optimal for the enzymatic activity, for a meaningful comparison, we also produced a 3D reconstruction of the LdcI at active pH (LdcIa, pH 6.2). INTRO 51 65 biodegradative protein_state This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 74 86 biosynthetic protein_state This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 87 108 lysine decarboxylases protein_type This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 166 178 pH-dependent protein_state This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 201 205 RavA protein This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 240 257 RavA binding site site This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 289 296 β-sheet structure_element This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 300 304 LdcI protein This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 364 382 LdcI-LdcC chimeras mutant This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 392 404 interchanged experimental_method This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 420 428 β-sheets structure_element This comparison pinpointed differences between the biodegradative and the biosynthetic lysine decarboxylases and brought to light interdomain movements associated to pH-dependent enzyme activation and RavA binding, notably at the predicted RavA binding site at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI. Consequently, we tested the capacity of cage formation by LdcI-LdcC chimeras where we interchanged the C-terminal β-sheets in question. INTRO 22 49 multiple sequence alignment experimental_method Finally, we performed multiple sequence alignment of 22 lysine decarboxylases from Enterobacteriaceae containing the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. INTRO 56 77 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Finally, we performed multiple sequence alignment of 22 lysine decarboxylases from Enterobacteriaceae containing the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. INTRO 83 101 Enterobacteriaceae taxonomy_domain Finally, we performed multiple sequence alignment of 22 lysine decarboxylases from Enterobacteriaceae containing the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. INTRO 117 133 ravA-viaA operon gene Finally, we performed multiple sequence alignment of 22 lysine decarboxylases from Enterobacteriaceae containing the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. INTRO 48 65 specific residues structure_element Remarkably, this analysis revealed that several specific residues in the above-mentioned β-sheet, independently of the rest of the protein sequence, are sufficient to define if a particular lysine decarboxylase should be classified as an “LdcC-like” or an “LdcI-like”. INTRO 89 96 β-sheet structure_element Remarkably, this analysis revealed that several specific residues in the above-mentioned β-sheet, independently of the rest of the protein sequence, are sufficient to define if a particular lysine decarboxylase should be classified as an “LdcC-like” or an “LdcI-like”. INTRO 190 210 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Remarkably, this analysis revealed that several specific residues in the above-mentioned β-sheet, independently of the rest of the protein sequence, are sufficient to define if a particular lysine decarboxylase should be classified as an “LdcC-like” or an “LdcI-like”. INTRO 239 248 LdcC-like protein_type Remarkably, this analysis revealed that several specific residues in the above-mentioned β-sheet, independently of the rest of the protein sequence, are sufficient to define if a particular lysine decarboxylase should be classified as an “LdcC-like” or an “LdcI-like”. INTRO 257 266 LdcI-like protein_type Remarkably, this analysis revealed that several specific residues in the above-mentioned β-sheet, independently of the rest of the protein sequence, are sufficient to define if a particular lysine decarboxylase should be classified as an “LdcC-like” or an “LdcI-like”. INTRO 56 60 RavA protein This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 103 118 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 119 139 lysine decarboxylase protein_type This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 156 183 high degree of conservation protein_state This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 192 214 small structural motif structure_element This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 279 293 biodegradative protein_state This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 294 309 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 310 331 lysine decarboxylases protein_type This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 340 351 AAA+ ATPase protein_type This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 352 356 RavA protein This fascinating parallelism between the propensity for RavA binding and the genetic environment of an enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase, as well as the high degree of conservation of this small structural motif, emphasize the functional importance of the interaction between biodegradative enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases and the AAA+ ATPase RavA. INTRO 0 6 CryoEM experimental_method CryoEM 3D reconstructions of LdcC, LdcIa and LdcI-LARA RESULTS 7 25 3D reconstructions evidence CryoEM 3D reconstructions of LdcC, LdcIa and LdcI-LARA RESULTS 29 33 LdcC protein CryoEM 3D reconstructions of LdcC, LdcIa and LdcI-LARA RESULTS 35 40 LdcIa protein CryoEM 3D reconstructions of LdcC, LdcIa and LdcI-LARA RESULTS 45 54 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly CryoEM 3D reconstructions of LdcC, LdcIa and LdcI-LARA RESULTS 73 79 cryoEM experimental_method In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 80 95 reconstructions evidence In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 103 110 E. coli species In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 111 132 lysine decarboxylases protein_type In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 136 146 pH optimal protein_state In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 197 203 cryoEM experimental_method In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 204 207 map evidence In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 215 219 LdcC protein In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 221 227 pH 7.5 protein_state In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 341 347 cryoEM experimental_method In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 348 351 map evidence In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 359 364 LdcIa protein In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 367 373 pH 6.2 protein_state In the frame of this work, we produced two novel subnanometer resolution cryoEM reconstructions of the E. coli lysine decarboxylases at pH optimal for their enzymatic activity – a 5.5 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcC (pH 7.5) for which no 3D structural information has been previously available (Figs 1A,B and S1), and a 6.1 Å resolution cryoEM map of the LdcIa, (pH 6.2) (Figs 1C,D and S2). RESULTS 37 43 cryoEM experimental_method In addition, we improved our earlier cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex from 7.5 Å to 6.2 Å resolution (Figs 1E,F and S3). RESULTS 44 47 map evidence In addition, we improved our earlier cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex from 7.5 Å to 6.2 Å resolution (Figs 1E,F and S3). RESULTS 55 64 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly In addition, we improved our earlier cryoEM map of the LdcI-LARA complex from 7.5 Å to 6.2 Å resolution (Figs 1E,F and S3). RESULTS 15 30 reconstructions evidence Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 41 60 pseudoatomic models evidence Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 102 121 flexible fitting of experimental_method Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 133 150 crystal structure evidence Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 154 159 LdcIi protein Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 173 198 structural homology model experimental_method Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 202 206 LdcC protein Based on these reconstructions, reliable pseudoatomic models of the three assemblies were obtained by flexible fitting of either the crystal structure of LdcIi or a derived structural homology model of LdcC (Table S1). RESULTS 38 57 pseudoatomic models evidence Significant differences between these pseudoatomic models can be interpreted as movements between specific biological states of the proteins as described below. RESULTS 4 16 wing domains structure_element The wing domains as a stable anchor at the center of the double-ring RESULTS 57 68 double-ring structure_element The wing domains as a stable anchor at the center of the double-ring RESULTS 46 58 superimposed experimental_method As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 69 75 cryoEM experimental_method As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 76 91 reconstructions evidence As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 93 98 LdcIa protein As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 100 109 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 114 118 LdcC protein As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 128 145 crystal structure evidence As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 153 158 LdcIi protein As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 159 166 decamer oligomeric_state As a first step of a comparative analysis, we superimposed the three cryoEM reconstructions (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) and the crystal structure of the LdcIi decamer (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). RESULTS 5 18 superposition experimental_method This superposition reveals that the densities lining the central hole of the toroid are roughly at the same location, while the rest of the structure exhibits noticeable changes. RESULTS 36 45 densities evidence This superposition reveals that the densities lining the central hole of the toroid are roughly at the same location, while the rest of the structure exhibits noticeable changes. RESULTS 57 69 central hole structure_element This superposition reveals that the densities lining the central hole of the toroid are roughly at the same location, while the rest of the structure exhibits noticeable changes. RESULTS 77 83 toroid structure_element This superposition reveals that the densities lining the central hole of the toroid are roughly at the same location, while the rest of the structure exhibits noticeable changes. RESULTS 140 149 structure evidence This superposition reveals that the densities lining the central hole of the toroid are roughly at the same location, while the rest of the structure exhibits noticeable changes. RESULTS 35 46 double-ring structure_element Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 51 63 wing domains structure_element Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 92 101 conserved protein_state Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 134 167 lowest root mean square deviation evidence Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 169 173 RMSD evidence Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 243 247 CTDs structure_element Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 263 285 RavA binding interface site Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 307 311 RMSD evidence Specifically, at the center of the double-ring the wing domains of the subunits provide the conserved basis for the assembly with the lowest root mean square deviation (RMSD) (between 1.4 and 2 Å for the Cα atoms only), whereas the peripheral CTDs containing the RavA binding interface manifest the highest RMSD (up to 4.2 Å) (Table S2). RESULTS 17 29 wing domains structure_element In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 37 47 structures evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 75 79 RMSD evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 116 123 RMSDmin evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 185 191 cryoEM experimental_method In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 192 196 maps evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 232 244 wing domains structure_element In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 261 271 structures evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 332 336 RMSD evidence In addition, the wing domains of all structures are very similar, with the RMSD after optimal rigid body alignment (RMSDmin) less than 1.1 Å. Thus, taking the limited resolution of the cryoEM maps into account, we consider that the wing domains of all the four structures are essentially identical and that in the present study the RMSD of less than 2 Å can serve as a baseline below which differences may be assumed as insignificant. RESULTS 25 37 central part structure_element This preservation of the central part of the double-ring assembly may help the enzymes to maintain their decameric state upon activation and incorporation into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 105 114 decameric oligomeric_state This preservation of the central part of the double-ring assembly may help the enzymes to maintain their decameric state upon activation and incorporation into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 164 173 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly This preservation of the central part of the double-ring assembly may help the enzymes to maintain their decameric state upon activation and incorporation into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 4 15 core domain structure_element The core domain and the active site rearrangements upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 24 35 active site site The core domain and the active site rearrangements upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 56 68 pH-dependent protein_state The core domain and the active site rearrangements upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 5 22 visual inspection experimental_method Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 36 53 RMSD calculations experimental_method Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 94 104 structures evidence Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 108 117 active pH protein_state Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 119 124 LdcIa protein Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 126 135 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 140 144 LdcC protein Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 213 220 high pH protein_state Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 233 238 LdcIi protein Both visual inspection (Fig. 2) and RMSD calculations (Table S2) show that globally the three structures at active pH (LdcIa, LdcI-LARA and LdcC) are more similar to each other than to the structure determined at high pH conditions (LdcIi). RESULTS 4 13 decameric oligomeric_state The decameric enzyme is built of five dimers associating into a 5-fold symmetrical double-ring (two monomers making a dimer are delineated in Fig. 1). RESULTS 38 44 dimers oligomeric_state The decameric enzyme is built of five dimers associating into a 5-fold symmetrical double-ring (two monomers making a dimer are delineated in Fig. 1). RESULTS 64 94 5-fold symmetrical double-ring structure_element The decameric enzyme is built of five dimers associating into a 5-fold symmetrical double-ring (two monomers making a dimer are delineated in Fig. 1). RESULTS 100 108 monomers oligomeric_state The decameric enzyme is built of five dimers associating into a 5-fold symmetrical double-ring (two monomers making a dimer are delineated in Fig. 1). RESULTS 118 123 dimer oligomeric_state The decameric enzyme is built of five dimers associating into a 5-fold symmetrical double-ring (two monomers making a dimer are delineated in Fig. 1). RESULTS 18 26 α family protein_type As common for the α family of the PLP-dependent decarboxylases, dimerization is required for the enzymatic activity because the active site is buried in the dimer interface (Fig. 3A,B). RESULTS 34 62 PLP-dependent decarboxylases protein_type As common for the α family of the PLP-dependent decarboxylases, dimerization is required for the enzymatic activity because the active site is buried in the dimer interface (Fig. 3A,B). RESULTS 128 139 active site site As common for the α family of the PLP-dependent decarboxylases, dimerization is required for the enzymatic activity because the active site is buried in the dimer interface (Fig. 3A,B). RESULTS 157 172 dimer interface site As common for the α family of the PLP-dependent decarboxylases, dimerization is required for the enzymatic activity because the active site is buried in the dimer interface (Fig. 3A,B). RESULTS 5 14 interface site This interface is formed essentially by the core domains with some contribution of the CTDs. RESULTS 44 56 core domains structure_element This interface is formed essentially by the core domains with some contribution of the CTDs. RESULTS 87 91 CTDs structure_element This interface is formed essentially by the core domains with some contribution of the CTDs. RESULTS 4 15 core domain structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 32 53 PLP-binding subdomain structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 55 61 PLP-SD structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 72 79 184–417 residue_range The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 104 114 subdomains structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 123 140 partly disordered protein_state The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 141 146 loops structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 153 166 linker region structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 177 184 130–183 residue_range The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 194 205 subdomain 4 structure_element The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 216 223 418–563 residue_range The core domain is built by the PLP-binding subdomain (PLP-SD, residues 184–417) flanked by two smaller subdomains rich in partly disordered loops – the linker region (residues 130–183) and the subdomain 4 (residues 418–563). RESULTS 33 39 PLP-SD structure_element Zooming in the variations in the PLP-SD shows that most of the structural changes concern displacements in the active site (Fig. 3C–F). RESULTS 111 122 active site site Zooming in the variations in the PLP-SD shows that most of the structural changes concern displacements in the active site (Fig. 3C–F). RESULTS 45 52 PLP-SDs structure_element The most conspicuous differences between the PLP-SDs can be linked to the pH-dependent activation of the enzymes. RESULTS 74 86 pH-dependent protein_state The most conspicuous differences between the PLP-SDs can be linked to the pH-dependent activation of the enzymes. RESULTS 22 28 cryoEM experimental_method The resolution of the cryoEM maps does not allow modeling the position of the PLP moiety and calls for caution in detailed mechanistic interpretations in terms of individual amino acids. RESULTS 29 33 maps evidence The resolution of the cryoEM maps does not allow modeling the position of the PLP moiety and calls for caution in detailed mechanistic interpretations in terms of individual amino acids. RESULTS 78 81 PLP chemical The resolution of the cryoEM maps does not allow modeling the position of the PLP moiety and calls for caution in detailed mechanistic interpretations in terms of individual amino acids. RESULTS 174 185 amino acids chemical The resolution of the cryoEM maps does not allow modeling the position of the PLP moiety and calls for caution in detailed mechanistic interpretations in terms of individual amino acids. RESULTS 31 36 LdcIi protein In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 40 49 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 117 128 active site site In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 129 138 α-helices structure_element In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 157 164 218–232 residue_range In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 169 176 246–254 residue_range In particular, transition from LdcIi to LdcI-LARA involves ~3.5 Å and ~4.5 Å shifts away from the 5-fold axis in the active site α-helices spanning residues 218–232 and 246–254 respectively (Fig. 3C–E). RESULTS 32 39 PLP-SDs structure_element Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 43 48 LdcIa protein Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 53 57 LdcC protein Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 97 104 decamer oligomeric_state Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 131 138 RMSDmin evidence Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 194 204 optimal pH protein_state Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 212 233 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Between these two extremes, the PLP-SDs of LdcIa and LdcC are similar both in the context of the decamer (Fig. 3F) and in terms of RMSDmin = 0.9 Å, which probably reflects the fact that, at the optimal pH, these lysine decarboxylases have a similar enzymatic activity. RESULTS 25 48 biochemical observation experimental_method In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 80 85 LdcIa protein In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 103 107 RavA protein In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 181 192 active site site In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 214 219 LdcIa protein In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 223 232 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly In addition, our earlier biochemical observation that the enzymatic activity of LdcIa is unaffected by RavA binding is consistent with the relatively small changes undergone by the active site upon transition from LdcIa to LdcI-LARA. RESULTS 47 64 crystal structure evidence Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 68 73 LdcIi protein Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 91 100 inducible protein_state Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 101 123 arginine decarboxylase protein_type Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 124 128 AdiA protein Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 138 155 high conservation protein_state Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 163 188 PLP-coordinating residues site Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 206 242 patch of negatively charged residues site Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 254 273 active site channel site Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 289 301 binding site site Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 317 327 amino acid chemical Worthy of note, our previous comparison of the crystal structure of LdcIi with that of the inducible arginine decarboxylase AdiA revealed high conservation of the PLP-coordinating residues and identified a patch of negatively charged residues lining the active site channel as a potential binding site for the target amino acid substrate (Figs S3 and S4 in ref.). RESULTS 22 42 ppGpp binding pocket site Rearrangements of the ppGpp binding pocket upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 48 60 pH-dependent protein_state Rearrangements of the ppGpp binding pocket upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 83 87 LARA structure_element Rearrangements of the ppGpp binding pocket upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding RESULTS 20 24 LdcI protein An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 29 33 LdcC protein An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 48 75 stringent response alarmone chemical An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 76 81 ppGpp chemical An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 107 116 interface site An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 137 145 monomers oligomeric_state An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 158 162 ring structure_element An inhibitor of the LdcI and LdcC activity, the stringent response alarmone ppGpp, is known to bind at the interface between neighboring monomers within each ring (Fig. S4). RESULTS 4 24 ppGpp binding pocket site The ppGpp binding pocket is made up by residues from all domains and is located approximately 30 Å away from the PLP moiety. RESULTS 113 116 PLP chemical The ppGpp binding pocket is made up by residues from all domains and is located approximately 30 Å away from the PLP moiety. RESULTS 12 29 crystal structure evidence Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 37 48 ppGpp-LdcIi complex_assembly Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 53 59 solved experimental_method Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 103 112 structure evidence Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 120 130 ppGpp-free protein_state Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 131 136 LdcIi protein Whereas the crystal structure of the ppGpp-LdcIi was solved to 2 Å resolution, only a 4.1 Å resolution structure of the ppGpp-free LdcIi could be obtained. RESULTS 24 27 apo protein_state At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 28 33 LdcIi protein At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 38 49 ppGpp-LdcIi complex_assembly At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 50 60 structures evidence At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 77 83 pH 8.5 protein_state At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 139 144 ppGpp chemical At this resolution, the apo-LdcIi and ppGpp-LdcIi structures (both solved at pH 8.5) appeared indistinguishable except for the presence of ppGpp (Fig. S11 in ref. ). RESULTS 39 43 LdcI protein Thus, we speculated that inhibition of LdcI by ppGpp would be accompanied by a transduction of subtle structural changes at the level of individual amino acid side chains between the ppGpp binding pocket and the active site of the enzyme. RESULTS 47 52 ppGpp chemical Thus, we speculated that inhibition of LdcI by ppGpp would be accompanied by a transduction of subtle structural changes at the level of individual amino acid side chains between the ppGpp binding pocket and the active site of the enzyme. RESULTS 148 158 amino acid chemical Thus, we speculated that inhibition of LdcI by ppGpp would be accompanied by a transduction of subtle structural changes at the level of individual amino acid side chains between the ppGpp binding pocket and the active site of the enzyme. RESULTS 183 203 ppGpp binding pocket site Thus, we speculated that inhibition of LdcI by ppGpp would be accompanied by a transduction of subtle structural changes at the level of individual amino acid side chains between the ppGpp binding pocket and the active site of the enzyme. RESULTS 212 223 active site site Thus, we speculated that inhibition of LdcI by ppGpp would be accompanied by a transduction of subtle structural changes at the level of individual amino acid side chains between the ppGpp binding pocket and the active site of the enzyme. RESULTS 16 22 cryoEM experimental_method All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 23 38 reconstructions evidence All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 46 67 lysine decarboxylases protein_type All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 89 99 absence of protein_state All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 100 105 ppGpp chemical All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 135 141 active protein_state All our current cryoEM reconstructions of the lysine decarboxylases were obtained in the absence of ppGpp in order to be closer to the active state of the enzymes under study. RESULTS 25 43 ppGpp binding site site While differences in the ppGpp binding site could indeed be visualized (Fig. S4), the level of resolution warns against speculations about their significance. RESULTS 31 35 RavA protein The fact that interaction with RavA reduces the ppGpp affinity for LdcI despite the long distance of ~30 Å between the LARA domain binding site and the closest ppGpp binding pocket (Fig. S5) seems to favor an allosteric regulation mechanism. RESULTS 48 53 ppGpp chemical The fact that interaction with RavA reduces the ppGpp affinity for LdcI despite the long distance of ~30 Å between the LARA domain binding site and the closest ppGpp binding pocket (Fig. S5) seems to favor an allosteric regulation mechanism. RESULTS 67 71 LdcI protein The fact that interaction with RavA reduces the ppGpp affinity for LdcI despite the long distance of ~30 Å between the LARA domain binding site and the closest ppGpp binding pocket (Fig. S5) seems to favor an allosteric regulation mechanism. RESULTS 119 143 LARA domain binding site site The fact that interaction with RavA reduces the ppGpp affinity for LdcI despite the long distance of ~30 Å between the LARA domain binding site and the closest ppGpp binding pocket (Fig. S5) seems to favor an allosteric regulation mechanism. RESULTS 160 180 ppGpp binding pocket site The fact that interaction with RavA reduces the ppGpp affinity for LdcI despite the long distance of ~30 Å between the LARA domain binding site and the closest ppGpp binding pocket (Fig. S5) seems to favor an allosteric regulation mechanism. RESULTS 36 58 ppGpp binding residues site Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 63 81 strictly conserved protein_state Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 90 94 LdcI protein Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 99 103 AdiA protein Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 120 128 decamers oligomeric_state Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 132 146 low pH optimal protein_state Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 155 177 arginine decarboxylase protein_type Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 191 196 ppGpp chemical Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 211 215 AdiA protein Interestingly, although a number of ppGpp binding residues are strictly conserved between LdcI and AdiA that also forms decamers at low pH optimal for its arginine decarboxylase activity, no ppGpp regulation of AdiA could be demonstrated. RESULTS 31 35 CTDs structure_element Swinging and stretching of the CTDs upon pH-dependent LdcI activation and LARA binding RESULTS 41 53 pH-dependent protein_state Swinging and stretching of the CTDs upon pH-dependent LdcI activation and LARA binding RESULTS 54 58 LdcI protein Swinging and stretching of the CTDs upon pH-dependent LdcI activation and LARA binding RESULTS 74 78 LARA structure_element Swinging and stretching of the CTDs upon pH-dependent LdcI activation and LARA binding RESULTS 18 30 superimposed experimental_method Inspection of the superimposed decameric structures (Figs 2 and S6) suggests a depiction of the wing domains as an anchor around which the peripheral CTDs swing. RESULTS 31 40 decameric oligomeric_state Inspection of the superimposed decameric structures (Figs 2 and S6) suggests a depiction of the wing domains as an anchor around which the peripheral CTDs swing. RESULTS 41 51 structures evidence Inspection of the superimposed decameric structures (Figs 2 and S6) suggests a depiction of the wing domains as an anchor around which the peripheral CTDs swing. RESULTS 96 108 wing domains structure_element Inspection of the superimposed decameric structures (Figs 2 and S6) suggests a depiction of the wing domains as an anchor around which the peripheral CTDs swing. RESULTS 150 154 CTDs structure_element Inspection of the superimposed decameric structures (Figs 2 and S6) suggests a depiction of the wing domains as an anchor around which the peripheral CTDs swing. RESULTS 51 63 core domains structure_element This swinging movement seems to be mediated by the core domains and is accompanied by a stretching of the whole LdcI subunits attracted by the RavA magnets. RESULTS 112 116 LdcI protein This swinging movement seems to be mediated by the core domains and is accompanied by a stretching of the whole LdcI subunits attracted by the RavA magnets. RESULTS 117 125 subunits structure_element This swinging movement seems to be mediated by the core domains and is accompanied by a stretching of the whole LdcI subunits attracted by the RavA magnets. RESULTS 143 147 RavA protein This swinging movement seems to be mediated by the core domains and is accompanied by a stretching of the whole LdcI subunits attracted by the RavA magnets. RESULTS 12 16 CTDs structure_element Indeed, all CTDs have very similar structures (RMSDmin <1 Å). RESULTS 47 54 RMSDmin evidence Indeed, all CTDs have very similar structures (RMSDmin <1 Å). RESULTS 8 21 superposition experimental_method Yet the superposition of the decamers lays bare a progressive movement of the CTD as a whole upon enzyme activation by pH and the binding of LARA. RESULTS 29 37 decamers oligomeric_state Yet the superposition of the decamers lays bare a progressive movement of the CTD as a whole upon enzyme activation by pH and the binding of LARA. RESULTS 78 81 CTD structure_element Yet the superposition of the decamers lays bare a progressive movement of the CTD as a whole upon enzyme activation by pH and the binding of LARA. RESULTS 141 145 LARA structure_element Yet the superposition of the decamers lays bare a progressive movement of the CTD as a whole upon enzyme activation by pH and the binding of LARA. RESULTS 4 9 LdcIi protein The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 10 17 monomer oligomeric_state The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 25 37 most compact protein_state The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 47 52 LdcIa protein The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 68 77 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 78 94 gradually extend protein_state The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 101 105 CTDs structure_element The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 118 129 LARA domain structure_element The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 133 137 RavA protein The LdcIi monomer is the most compact, whereas LdcIa and especially LdcI-LARA gradually extend their CTDs towards the LARA domain of RavA (Figs 2 and 4). RESULTS 107 111 LdcI protein These small but noticeable swinging and stretching (up to ~4 Å) may be related to the incorporation of the LdcI decamer into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 112 119 decamer oligomeric_state These small but noticeable swinging and stretching (up to ~4 Å) may be related to the incorporation of the LdcI decamer into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 129 138 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly These small but noticeable swinging and stretching (up to ~4 Å) may be related to the incorporation of the LdcI decamer into the LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 15 22 β-sheet structure_element The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase as a major determinant of the interaction with RavA RESULTS 28 48 lysine decarboxylase protein_type The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase as a major determinant of the interaction with RavA RESULTS 96 100 RavA protein The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase as a major determinant of the interaction with RavA RESULTS 54 59 LdcIi protein In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 68 72 LARA structure_element In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 73 91 crystal structures evidence In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 101 110 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 111 117 cryoEM experimental_method In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 118 125 density evidence In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 149 158 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 201 221 two-stranded β-sheet structure_element In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 229 233 LdcI protein In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 247 253 cryoEM experimental_method In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 254 258 maps evidence In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 263 282 pseudoatomic models evidence In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 355 364 inducible protein_state In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 373 385 constitutive protein_state In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 386 407 lysine decarboxylases protein_type In our previous contribution, based on the fit of the LdcIi and the LARA crystal structures into the LdcI-LARA cryoEM density, we predicted that the LdcI-RavA interaction should involve the C-terminal two-stranded β-sheet of the LdcI. Our present cryoEM maps and pseudoatomic models provide first structure-based insights into the differences between the inducible and the constitutive lysine decarboxylases. RESULTS 137 141 RavA protein Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 159 166 swapped experimental_method Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 180 188 β-sheets structure_element Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 228 236 chimeras mutant Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 245 250 LdcIC mutant Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 257 261 LdcI protein Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 282 289 β-sheet structure_element Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 293 297 LdcC protein Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 303 308 LdcCI mutant Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 315 319 LdcC protein Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 340 347 β-sheet structure_element Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 351 355 LdcI protein Therefore, we wanted to check the influence of the primary sequence of the two proteins in this region on their ability to interact with RavA. To this end, we swapped the relevant β-sheets of the two proteins and produced their chimeras, namely LdcIC (i.e. LdcI with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcC) and LdcCI (i.e. LdcC with the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI) (Fig. 5A–C). RESULTS 0 15 Both constructs mutant Both constructs could be purified and could form decamers visually indistinguishable from the wild-type proteins. RESULTS 49 57 decamers oligomeric_state Both constructs could be purified and could form decamers visually indistinguishable from the wild-type proteins. RESULTS 94 103 wild-type protein_state Both constructs could be purified and could form decamers visually indistinguishable from the wild-type proteins. RESULTS 24 28 LdcI protein As expected, binding of LdcI to RavA was completely abolished by this procedure and no LdcIC-RavA complex could be detected. RESULTS 32 36 RavA protein As expected, binding of LdcI to RavA was completely abolished by this procedure and no LdcIC-RavA complex could be detected. RESULTS 87 97 LdcIC-RavA complex_assembly As expected, binding of LdcI to RavA was completely abolished by this procedure and no LdcIC-RavA complex could be detected. RESULTS 17 29 introduction experimental_method On the contrary, introduction of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI into LdcC led to an assembly of the LdcCI-RavA complex. RESULTS 48 55 β-sheet structure_element On the contrary, introduction of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI into LdcC led to an assembly of the LdcCI-RavA complex. RESULTS 59 63 LdcI protein On the contrary, introduction of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI into LdcC led to an assembly of the LdcCI-RavA complex. RESULTS 69 73 LdcC protein On the contrary, introduction of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI into LdcC led to an assembly of the LdcCI-RavA complex. RESULTS 100 110 LdcCI-RavA complex_assembly On the contrary, introduction of the C-terminal β-sheet of LdcI into LdcC led to an assembly of the LdcCI-RavA complex. RESULTS 7 29 negative stain EM grid experimental_method On the negative stain EM grid, the chimeric cages appeared less rigid than the native LdcI-RavA, which probably means that the environment of the β-sheet contributes to the efficiency of the interaction and the stability of the entire architecture (Fig. 5D–F). RESULTS 35 43 chimeric protein_state On the negative stain EM grid, the chimeric cages appeared less rigid than the native LdcI-RavA, which probably means that the environment of the β-sheet contributes to the efficiency of the interaction and the stability of the entire architecture (Fig. 5D–F). RESULTS 79 85 native protein_state On the negative stain EM grid, the chimeric cages appeared less rigid than the native LdcI-RavA, which probably means that the environment of the β-sheet contributes to the efficiency of the interaction and the stability of the entire architecture (Fig. 5D–F). RESULTS 86 95 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly On the negative stain EM grid, the chimeric cages appeared less rigid than the native LdcI-RavA, which probably means that the environment of the β-sheet contributes to the efficiency of the interaction and the stability of the entire architecture (Fig. 5D–F). RESULTS 146 153 β-sheet structure_element On the negative stain EM grid, the chimeric cages appeared less rigid than the native LdcI-RavA, which probably means that the environment of the β-sheet contributes to the efficiency of the interaction and the stability of the entire architecture (Fig. 5D–F). RESULTS 15 22 β-sheet structure_element The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase is a highly conserved signature allowing to distinguish between LdcI and LdcC RESULTS 28 48 lysine decarboxylase protein_type The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase is a highly conserved signature allowing to distinguish between LdcI and LdcC RESULTS 54 70 highly conserved protein_state The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase is a highly conserved signature allowing to distinguish between LdcI and LdcC RESULTS 113 117 LdcI protein The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase is a highly conserved signature allowing to distinguish between LdcI and LdcC RESULTS 122 126 LdcC protein The C-terminal β-sheet of a lysine decarboxylase is a highly conserved signature allowing to distinguish between LdcI and LdcC RESULTS 0 34 Alignment of the primary sequences experimental_method Alignment of the primary sequences of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC shows that some amino acid residues of the C-terminal β-sheet are the same in the two proteins, whereas others are notably different in chemical nature. RESULTS 42 49 E. coli species Alignment of the primary sequences of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC shows that some amino acid residues of the C-terminal β-sheet are the same in the two proteins, whereas others are notably different in chemical nature. RESULTS 50 54 LdcI protein Alignment of the primary sequences of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC shows that some amino acid residues of the C-terminal β-sheet are the same in the two proteins, whereas others are notably different in chemical nature. RESULTS 59 63 LdcC protein Alignment of the primary sequences of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC shows that some amino acid residues of the C-terminal β-sheet are the same in the two proteins, whereas others are notably different in chemical nature. RESULTS 118 125 β-sheet structure_element Alignment of the primary sequences of the E. coli LdcI and LdcC shows that some amino acid residues of the C-terminal β-sheet are the same in the two proteins, whereas others are notably different in chemical nature. RESULTS 92 103 very region structure_element Importantly, most of the amino acid differences between the two enzymes are located in this very region. RESULTS 72 79 β-sheet structure_element Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 135 155 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 176 180 RavA protein Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 216 232 certain residues structure_element Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 241 248 β-sheet structure_element Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 253 262 conserved protein_state Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 266 287 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 301 315 enterobacteria taxonomy_domain Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 330 346 ravA-viaA operon gene Thus, to advance beyond our experimental confirmation of the C-terminal β-sheet as a major determinant of the capacity of a particular lysine decarboxylase to form a cage with RavA, we set out to investigate whether certain residues in this β-sheet are conserved in lysine decarboxylases of different enterobacteria that have the ravA-viaA operon in their genome. RESULTS 3 36 inspected the genetic environment experimental_method We inspected the genetic environment of lysine decarboxylases from 22 enterobacterial species referenced in the NCBI database, corrected the gene annotation where necessary (Tables S3 and S4), and performed multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis (see Methods). RESULTS 40 61 lysine decarboxylases protein_type We inspected the genetic environment of lysine decarboxylases from 22 enterobacterial species referenced in the NCBI database, corrected the gene annotation where necessary (Tables S3 and S4), and performed multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis (see Methods). RESULTS 70 85 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain We inspected the genetic environment of lysine decarboxylases from 22 enterobacterial species referenced in the NCBI database, corrected the gene annotation where necessary (Tables S3 and S4), and performed multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis (see Methods). RESULTS 207 234 multiple sequence alignment experimental_method We inspected the genetic environment of lysine decarboxylases from 22 enterobacterial species referenced in the NCBI database, corrected the gene annotation where necessary (Tables S3 and S4), and performed multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis (see Methods). RESULTS 248 269 phylogenetic analysis experimental_method We inspected the genetic environment of lysine decarboxylases from 22 enterobacterial species referenced in the NCBI database, corrected the gene annotation where necessary (Tables S3 and S4), and performed multiple sequence alignment coupled to a phylogenetic analysis (see Methods). RESULTS 14 32 consensus sequence evidence First of all, consensus sequence for the entire lysine decarboxylase family was derived. RESULTS 48 68 lysine decarboxylase protein_type First of all, consensus sequence for the entire lysine decarboxylase family was derived. RESULTS 12 33 phylogenetic analysis experimental_method Second, the phylogenetic analysis clearly split the lysine decarboxylases into two groups (Fig. 6A). RESULTS 52 73 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Second, the phylogenetic analysis clearly split the lysine decarboxylases into two groups (Fig. 6A). RESULTS 4 25 lysine decarboxylases protein_type All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 43 52 LdcI-like protein_type All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 57 70 biodegradable protein_state All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 179 183 CadB protein All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 184 194 antiporter protein_type All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 247 254 enzymes protein_type All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 269 278 LdcC-like protein_type All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 283 295 biosynthetic protein_state All lysine decarboxylases predicted to be “LdcI-like” or biodegradable based on their genetic environment, as for example their organization in an operon with a gene encoding the CadB antiporter (see Methods), were found in one group, whereas all enzymes predicted as “LdcC-like” or biosynthetic partitioned into another group. RESULTS 6 25 consensus sequences evidence Thus, consensus sequences could also be determined for each of the two groups (Figs 6B,C and S7). RESULTS 20 39 consensus sequences evidence Inspection of these consensus sequences revealed important differences between the groups regarding charge, size and hydrophobicity of several residues precisely at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet that is responsible for the interaction with RavA (Fig. 6B–D). RESULTS 193 200 β-sheet structure_element Inspection of these consensus sequences revealed important differences between the groups regarding charge, size and hydrophobicity of several residues precisely at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet that is responsible for the interaction with RavA (Fig. 6B–D). RESULTS 246 250 RavA protein Inspection of these consensus sequences revealed important differences between the groups regarding charge, size and hydrophobicity of several residues precisely at the level of the C-terminal β-sheet that is responsible for the interaction with RavA (Fig. 6B–D). RESULTS 36 59 site-directed mutations experimental_method For example, in our previous study, site-directed mutations identified Y697 as critically required for the RavA binding. RESULTS 71 75 Y697 residue_name_number For example, in our previous study, site-directed mutations identified Y697 as critically required for the RavA binding. RESULTS 107 111 RavA protein For example, in our previous study, site-directed mutations identified Y697 as critically required for the RavA binding. RESULTS 32 36 Y697 residue_name_number Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 40 58 strictly conserved protein_state Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 67 76 LdcI-like protein_type Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 97 106 LdcC-like protein_type Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 116 127 always have protein_state Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 130 136 lysine residue_name Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 242 246 RavA protein Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 277 302 site-directed mutagenesis experimental_method Our current analysis shows that Y697 is strictly conserved in the “LdcI-like” group whereas the “LdcC-like” enzymes always have a lysine in this position; it also uncovers several other residues potentially essential for the interaction with RavA which can now be addressed by site-directed mutagenesis. RESULTS 81 90 LdcI-like protein_type The third and most remarkable finding was that exactly the same separation into “LdcI-like” and “LdcC”-like groups can be obtained based on a comparison of the C-terminal β-sheets only, without taking the rest of the primary sequence into account. RESULTS 97 107 LdcC”-like protein_type The third and most remarkable finding was that exactly the same separation into “LdcI-like” and “LdcC”-like groups can be obtained based on a comparison of the C-terminal β-sheets only, without taking the rest of the primary sequence into account. RESULTS 171 179 β-sheets structure_element The third and most remarkable finding was that exactly the same separation into “LdcI-like” and “LdcC”-like groups can be obtained based on a comparison of the C-terminal β-sheets only, without taking the rest of the primary sequence into account. RESULTS 25 32 β-sheet structure_element Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 52 68 highly conserved protein_state Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 69 87 signature sequence structure_element Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 143 152 LdcI-like protein_type Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 159 168 LdcC-like protein_type Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 170 185 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 186 207 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Therefore the C-terminal β-sheet emerges as being a highly conserved signature sequence, sufficient to unambiguously discriminate between the “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases independently of any other information (Figs 6 and S7). RESULTS 4 14 structures evidence Our structures show that this motif is not involved in the enzymatic activity or the oligomeric state of the proteins. RESULTS 25 35 this motif structure_element Our structures show that this motif is not involved in the enzymatic activity or the oligomeric state of the proteins. RESULTS 6 20 enterobacteria taxonomy_domain Thus, enterobacteria identified here (Fig. 6, Table S4) appear to exert evolutionary pressure on the biodegradative lysine decarboxylase towards the RavA binding. RESULTS 101 115 biodegradative protein_state Thus, enterobacteria identified here (Fig. 6, Table S4) appear to exert evolutionary pressure on the biodegradative lysine decarboxylase towards the RavA binding. RESULTS 116 136 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Thus, enterobacteria identified here (Fig. 6, Table S4) appear to exert evolutionary pressure on the biodegradative lysine decarboxylase towards the RavA binding. RESULTS 149 153 RavA protein Thus, enterobacteria identified here (Fig. 6, Table S4) appear to exert evolutionary pressure on the biodegradative lysine decarboxylase towards the RavA binding. RESULTS 35 44 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 65 69 LdcI protein One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 99 114 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 140 144 LdcI protein One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 163 190 stringent response alarmone chemical One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 191 196 ppGpp chemical One of the elucidated roles of the LdcI-RavA cage is to maintain LdcI activity under conditions of enterobacterial starvation by preventing LdcI inhibition by the stringent response alarmone ppGpp. RESULTS 57 61 LdcI protein Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 66 70 RavA protein Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 85 93 subunits structure_element Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 101 122 respiratory complex I protein_type Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 169 173 RavA protein Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 201 221 iron-sulfur proteins protein_type Furthermore, the recently documented interaction of both LdcI and RavA with specific subunits of the respiratory complex I, together with the unanticipated link between RavA and maturation of numerous iron-sulfur proteins, tend to suggest an additional intriguing function for this 3.5 MDa assembly. RESULTS 37 41 LdcI protein The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 69 73 RavA protein The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 167 176 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 250 265 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 266 286 lysine decarboxylase protein_type The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 299 308 LdcI-like protein_type The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 314 323 LdcC-like protein_type The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 397 406 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly The conformational rearrangements of LdcI upon enzyme activation and RavA binding revealed in this work, and our amazing finding that the molecular determinant of the LdcI-RavA interaction is the one that straightforwardly determines if a particular enterobacterial lysine decarboxylase belongs to “LdcI-like” or “LdcC-like” proteins, should give a new impetus to functional studies of the unique LdcI-RavA cage. RESULTS 13 23 structures evidence Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 32 51 pseudoatomic models evidence Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 59 65 active protein_state Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 66 76 ppGpp-free protein_state Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 96 110 biodegradative protein_state Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 119 131 biosynthetic protein_state Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 132 139 E. coli species Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 140 161 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 217 221 UPEC species Besides, the structures and the pseudoatomic models of the active ppGpp-free states of both the biodegradative and the biosynthetic E. coli lysine decarboxylases offer an additional tool for analysis of their role in UPEC infectivity. RESULTS 18 21 apo protein_state Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 22 26 LdcI protein Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 31 42 ppGpp-LdcIi complex_assembly Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 43 61 crystal structures evidence Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 67 73 cryoEM experimental_method Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 74 89 reconstructions evidence Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 179 200 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 212 226 enterobacteria taxonomy_domain Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 264 282 Enterobacteriaceae taxonomy_domain Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 301 321 lysine decarboxylase protein_type Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 325 344 Eikenella corrodens species Together with the apo-LdcI and ppGpp-LdcIi crystal structures, our cryoEM reconstructions provide a structural framework for future studies of structure-function relationships of lysine decarboxylases from other enterobacteria and even of their homologues outside Enterobacteriaceae. For example, the lysine decarboxylase of Eikenella corrodens is thought to play a major role in the periodontal disease and its inhibitors were shown to retard gingivitis development. RESULTS 9 19 cadaverine chemical Finally, cadaverine being an important platform chemical for the production of industrial polymers such as nylon, structural information is valuable for optimisation of bacterial lysine decarboxylases used for its production in biotechnology. RESULTS 169 178 bacterial taxonomy_domain Finally, cadaverine being an important platform chemical for the production of industrial polymers such as nylon, structural information is valuable for optimisation of bacterial lysine decarboxylases used for its production in biotechnology. RESULTS 179 200 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Finally, cadaverine being an important platform chemical for the production of industrial polymers such as nylon, structural information is valuable for optimisation of bacterial lysine decarboxylases used for its production in biotechnology. RESULTS 3 9 cryoEM experimental_method 3D cryoEM reconstructions of LdcC, LdcI-LARA and LdcIa. FIG 10 25 reconstructions evidence 3D cryoEM reconstructions of LdcC, LdcI-LARA and LdcIa. FIG 29 33 LdcC protein 3D cryoEM reconstructions of LdcC, LdcI-LARA and LdcIa. FIG 35 44 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly 3D cryoEM reconstructions of LdcC, LdcI-LARA and LdcIa. FIG 49 54 LdcIa protein 3D cryoEM reconstructions of LdcC, LdcI-LARA and LdcIa. FIG 8 14 cryoEM experimental_method (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 15 18 map evidence (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 26 30 LdcC protein (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 36 41 LdcIa protein (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 50 59 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 64 72 decamers oligomeric_state (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 82 90 protomer oligomeric_state (A,C,E) cryoEM map of the LdcC (A), LdcIa (C) and LdcI-LARA (E) decamers with one protomer in light grey. FIG 19 28 protomers oligomeric_state In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 34 38 wing structure_element In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 40 44 core structure_element In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 49 67 C-terminal domains structure_element In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 122 126 LdcC protein In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 141 146 LdcIa protein In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 164 168 LdcI protein In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 172 181 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly In the rest of the protomers, the wing, core and C-terminal domains are colored from light to dark in shades of green for LdcC (A), pink for LdcIa (C) and blue for LdcI in LdcI-LARA (E). FIG 13 24 LARA domain structure_element In (E), the LARA domain density is shown in dark grey. FIG 4 12 monomers oligomeric_state Two monomers making a dimer are delineated. FIG 22 27 dimer oligomeric_state Two monomers making a dimer are delineated. FIG 28 36 protomer oligomeric_state Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 46 52 cryoEM experimental_method Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 53 56 map evidence Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 64 68 LdcC protein Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 74 79 LdcIa protein Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 88 97 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 125 143 pseudoatomic model evidence Scale bar 50 Å. (B,D,F) One protomer from the cryoEM map of the LdcC (B), LdcIa (D) and LdcI-LARA (F) in light grey with the pseudoatomic model represented as cartoons and colored as the densities in (A,C,E). FIG 0 13 Superposition experimental_method Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 21 40 pseudoatomic models evidence Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 44 48 LdcC protein Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 50 54 LdcI protein Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 60 69 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 74 79 LdcIa protein Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 110 127 crystal structure evidence Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 131 136 LdcIi protein Superposition of the pseudoatomic models of LdcC, LdcI from LdcI-LARA and LdcIa colored as in Fig. 1, and the crystal structure of LdcIi in shades of yellow. FIG 20 25 rings structure_element Only one of the two rings of the double toroid is shown for clarity. FIG 33 46 double toroid structure_element Only one of the two rings of the double toroid is shown for clarity. FIG 40 46 region structure_element The dashed circle indicates the central region that remains virtually unchanged between all the structures, while the periphery undergoes visible movements. FIG 96 106 structures evidence The dashed circle indicates the central region that remains virtually unchanged between all the structures, while the periphery undergoes visible movements. FIG 44 55 active site site Conformational rearrangements in the enzyme active site. FIG 4 9 LdcIi protein (A) LdcIi crystal structure, with one ring represented as a grey surface and the second as a cartoon. FIG 10 27 crystal structure evidence (A) LdcIi crystal structure, with one ring represented as a grey surface and the second as a cartoon. FIG 38 42 ring structure_element (A) LdcIi crystal structure, with one ring represented as a grey surface and the second as a cartoon. FIG 2 9 monomer oligomeric_state A monomer with its PLP cofactor is delineated. FIG 19 22 PLP chemical A monomer with its PLP cofactor is delineated. FIG 4 7 PLP chemical The PLP moieties of the cartoon ring are shown in red. FIG 32 36 ring structure_element The PLP moieties of the cartoon ring are shown in red. FIG 9 14 LdcIi protein (B) The LdcIi dimer extracted from the crystal structure of the decamer. FIG 15 20 dimer oligomeric_state (B) The LdcIi dimer extracted from the crystal structure of the decamer. FIG 40 57 crystal structure evidence (B) The LdcIi dimer extracted from the crystal structure of the decamer. FIG 65 72 decamer oligomeric_state (B) The LdcIi dimer extracted from the crystal structure of the decamer. FIG 4 11 monomer oligomeric_state One monomer is colored in shades of yellow as in Figs 1 and 2, while the monomer related by C2 symmetry is grey. FIG 73 80 monomer oligomeric_state One monomer is colored in shades of yellow as in Figs 1 and 2, while the monomer related by C2 symmetry is grey. FIG 4 7 PLP chemical The PLP is red. FIG 4 15 active site site The active site is boxed. FIG 18 22 LdcI protein Stretching of the LdcI monomer upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding. FIG 23 30 monomer oligomeric_state Stretching of the LdcI monomer upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding. FIG 36 48 pH-dependent protein_state Stretching of the LdcI monomer upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding. FIG 71 75 LARA structure_element Stretching of the LdcI monomer upon pH-dependent enzyme activation and LARA binding. FIG 26 45 pseudoatomic models evidence (A–C) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcI monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2) The rectangle indicates the regions enlarged in (D–F). FIG 53 57 LdcI protein (A–C) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcI monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2) The rectangle indicates the regions enlarged in (D–F). FIG 58 66 monomers oligomeric_state (A–C) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcI monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2) The rectangle indicates the regions enlarged in (D–F). FIG 86 98 superimposed experimental_method (A–C) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcI monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2) The rectangle indicates the regions enlarged in (D–F). FIG 99 107 decamers oligomeric_state (A–C) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcI monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2) The rectangle indicates the regions enlarged in (D–F). FIG 13 18 LdcIi protein (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 32 37 LdcIa protein (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 59 64 LdcIa protein (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 76 85 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 111 116 LdcIi protein (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 127 132 LdcIa protein (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 144 153 LdcI-LARA complex_assembly (A) compares LdcIi (yellow) and LdcIa (pink), (B) compares LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue), and (C) compares LdcIi (yellow), LdcIa (pink) and LdcI-LARA (blue) simultaneously in order to show the progressive stretching described in the text. FIG 4 10 cryoEM experimental_method The cryoEM density of the LARA domain is represented as a grey surface to show the position of the binding site and the direction of the movement. FIG 11 18 density evidence The cryoEM density of the LARA domain is represented as a grey surface to show the position of the binding site and the direction of the movement. FIG 26 37 LARA domain structure_element The cryoEM density of the LARA domain is represented as a grey surface to show the position of the binding site and the direction of the movement. FIG 99 111 binding site site The cryoEM density of the LARA domain is represented as a grey surface to show the position of the binding site and the direction of the movement. FIG 29 32 CTD structure_element (D–F) Inserts zooming at the CTD part in proximity of the LARA binding site. FIG 58 75 LARA binding site site (D–F) Inserts zooming at the CTD part in proximity of the LARA binding site. FIG 16 21 LdcIC mutant Analysis of the LdcIC and LdcCI chimeras. FIG 26 31 LdcCI mutant Analysis of the LdcIC and LdcCI chimeras. FIG 32 40 chimeras mutant Analysis of the LdcIC and LdcCI chimeras. FIG 24 43 pseudoatomic models evidence (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 51 56 LdcIa protein (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 70 74 LdcC protein (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 83 91 monomers oligomeric_state (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 111 123 superimposed experimental_method (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 124 132 decamers oligomeric_state (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 162 169 β-sheet structure_element (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 173 178 LdcIa protein (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 183 187 LdcC protein (A) A slice through the pseudoatomic models of the LdcIa (purple) and LdcC (green) monomers extracted from the superimposed decamers (Fig. 2). (B) The C-terminal β-sheet in LdcIa and LdcC enlarged from (A,C) Exchanged primary sequences (capital letters) and their immediate vicinity (lower case letters) colored as in (A,B), with the corresponding secondary structure elements and the amino acid numbering shown. FIG 55 64 wild type protein_state (D,E) A gallery of negative stain EM images of (D) the wild type LdcI-RavA cage and (E) the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. (F) Some representative class averages of the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. FIG 65 74 LdcI-RavA complex_assembly (D,E) A gallery of negative stain EM images of (D) the wild type LdcI-RavA cage and (E) the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. (F) Some representative class averages of the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. FIG 92 122 LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles mutant (D,E) A gallery of negative stain EM images of (D) the wild type LdcI-RavA cage and (E) the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. (F) Some representative class averages of the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. FIG 170 200 LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles mutant (D,E) A gallery of negative stain EM images of (D) the wild type LdcI-RavA cage and (E) the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. (F) Some representative class averages of the LdcCI-RavA cage-like particles. FIG 0 17 Sequence analysis experimental_method Sequence analysis of enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases. FIG 21 36 enterobacterial taxonomy_domain Sequence analysis of enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases. FIG 37 58 lysine decarboxylases protein_type Sequence analysis of enterobacterial lysine decarboxylases. FIG 4 27 Maximum likelihood tree evidence (A) Maximum likelihood tree with the “LdcC-like” and the “LdcI-like” groups highlighted in green and pink, respectively. FIG 38 47 LdcC-like protein_type (A) Maximum likelihood tree with the “LdcC-like” and the “LdcI-like” groups highlighted in green and pink, respectively. FIG 58 67 LdcI-like protein_type (A) Maximum likelihood tree with the “LdcC-like” and the “LdcI-like” groups highlighted in green and pink, respectively. FIG 27 36 LdcI-like protein_type (B) Analysis of consensus “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” sequences around the first and second C-terminal β-strands. FIG 43 52 LdcC-like protein_type (B) Analysis of consensus “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” sequences around the first and second C-terminal β-strands. FIG 103 112 β-strands structure_element (B) Analysis of consensus “LdcI-like” and “LdcC-like” sequences around the first and second C-terminal β-strands. FIG 16 23 E. coli species Numbering as in E. coli. FIG 28 32 LdcI protein (C) Signature sequences of LdcI and LdcC in the C-terminal β-sheet. FIG 37 41 LdcC protein (C) Signature sequences of LdcI and LdcC in the C-terminal β-sheet. FIG 60 67 β-sheet structure_element (C) Signature sequences of LdcI and LdcC in the C-terminal β-sheet. FIG 116 122 cryoEM experimental_method Polarity differences are highlighted. (D) Position and nature of these differences at the surface of the respective cryoEM maps with the color code as in B. See also Fig. S7 and Tables S3 and S4. FIG 123 127 maps evidence Polarity differences are highlighted. (D) Position and nature of these differences at the surface of the respective cryoEM maps with the color code as in B. See also Fig. S7 and Tables S3 and S4. FIG