Premise: From the moment that, in an election campaign, there are posters on telephone poles or balconies showing the facial features of candidates-and we all know how important that is-to have one's picture on telephone poles or balconies, to have the photographs of just a few candidates on a ballot would be detrimental to those whose picture would not appear.

Hypothesis: It is better to have a photo of a candidate than not have one during election year.

From the passage above, it tells me that you have a better chance of winning if your photo is there.

Sejak saat itu, dalam kempen pilihan raya, terdapat poster pada tiang telefon atau balkoni yang menunjukkan ciri-ciri wajah calon-dan kita semua tahu betapa pentingnya-untuk mempunyai gambar seseorang pada tiang telefon atau balkoni, untuk mempunyai gambar-gambar segelintir calon dalam satu undi akan memudaratkan mereka yang gambarnya tidak akan muncul.

Adalah lebih baik untuk mempunyai gambar calon daripada tidak mempunyai gambar semasa tahun pilihan raya.


Premise: During the Clinton years, as you may recall, there was a fight over affirmative action. And there were many people, like myself, who opposed quotas, who felt there were places where it was overreaching. So we had a policy called "Mend it, don't end it. "We fixed it.

Hypothesis: clinton was a democrat

clinton made changes to affirmative action which is due to being democratic

Semasa tahun-tahun Clinton, seperti yang anda ingat, terdapat pergaduhan mengenai tindakan afirmatif. Dan terdapat ramai orang, seperti saya sendiri, yang menentang kuota, yang merasakan ada tempat di mana ia melampaui batas. Jadi kami mempunyai dasar yang dipanggil "Perbaiki, jangan tamatkannya. "Kami membetulkannya.


Premise: Even the overall target referred to in the November 12 statement was put in doubt just eight days later-this is how permanent these commitments are-when the Prime Minister implied to Premiers Tobin and Klein that in his misguided desire to look better than the Americans on this issue, perhaps a new target should be adopted by lowering GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007.

Hypothesis: In 2006, GHG emissions were higher than they were in 1990.

GHG emissions had to have been higher in 2006 than in 1990, because the end date of 2007 had not been reached at the time of the statement, which means it had to have been 2006 at the absolute latest. Plus they would have said - reduce them to 2006 levels, which would have been lower than 1990. Why else mention 1990?

Malah sasaran keseluruhan yang dirujuk dalam kenyataan 12 November telah diragui hanya lapan hari kemudian-beginilah kekalnya komitmen ini-apabila Perdana Menteri menyiratkan kepada Perdana Menteri Tobin dan Klein bahawa dalam keinginannya yang sesat untuk kelihatan lebih baik daripada orang Amerika. isu ini, mungkin sasaran baru harus diguna pakai dengan menurunkan pelepasan GHG ke paras 1990 menjelang tahun 2007.

Pada tahun 2006, pelepasan GHG adalah lebih tinggi daripada pada tahun 1990.


Premise: And we start -- we don't do it exclusively -- but we start by rolling back George Bush's unaffordable tax cut for the wealthiest people, people earning more than $200,000 a year, and we pass, hopefully, the McCain-Kerry Commission which identified some $60 billion that we can get.

Hypothesis: The speaker refers to George W. Bush, the son of George HW bush

This is true, given the  context of leaving out the HW part of the name.

Dan kami mulakan -- kami tidak melakukannya secara eksklusif -- tetapi kami mulakan dengan menarik balik pemotongan cukai George Bush yang tidak mampu dibayar untuk orang terkaya, orang yang berpendapatan lebih daripada $200,000 setahun, dan kami berharap, Suruhanjaya McCain-Kerry yang mengenal pasti kira-kira $60 bilion yang boleh kita perolehi.

Penceramah merujuk kepada George W. Bush, anak kepada George HW bush


Premise: And so the person you talked to, I say, here's some help, here's some trade adjustment assistance money for you to go a community college in your neighborhood, a community college which is providing the skills necessary to fill the jobs of the 21st century. And that's what I would say to that person.

Hypothesis: the community college will give the person the help they need

it is correct because the community college will help the person after they are given money to pay for it. it was difficult for the system because that was stated indirectly

Jadi orang yang anda ajak bercakap, saya katakan, inilah sedikit bantuan, inilah beberapa wang bantuan pelarasan perdagangan untuk anda pergi ke kolej komuniti di kawasan kejiranan anda, kolej komuniti yang menyediakan kemahiran yang diperlukan untuk mengisi pekerjaan abad ke-21. Dan itulah yang saya akan katakan kepada orang itu.

kolej komuniti akan memberi orang itu bantuan yang mereka perlukan


Premise: New question. As I was saying. Both of you -- Governor, both of you have talked much about Medicare and health care for seniors. What about the more than 40 million younger Americans who do not have health insurance right now? What would you do about that?

Hypothesis: The Governor cares more about health care for seniors than young people.

if he talks more about seniors's health that means he cares more.

Soalan baru. Seperti yang saya katakan. Anda berdua -- Gabenor, anda berdua telah banyak bercakap tentang Medicare dan penjagaan kesihatan untuk warga emas. Bagaimana pula dengan lebih 40 juta rakyat Amerika yang lebih muda yang tidak mempunyai insurans kesihatan sekarang? Apa yang anda akan lakukan tentang itu?

Gabenor lebih mementingkan penjagaan kesihatan untuk warga emas berbanding golongan muda.


Premise: The food guide then is currently serving as the basis for a wide variety of nutrition initiatives across Canada implemented by a broad range of partners including provincial, territorial and municipal governments as well as non-governmental organizations, consumer groups, the private sector and school boards.

Hypothesis: Canada has less than seventy letters.

To say Canada has less than seventy letters is definitely correct, because it only has six.

Panduan makanan kemudiannya berfungsi sebagai asas untuk pelbagai inisiatif pemakanan di seluruh Kanada yang dilaksanakan oleh pelbagai rakan kongsi termasuk kerajaan wilayah, wilayah dan perbandaran serta pertubuhan bukan kerajaan, kumpulan pengguna, sektor swasta dan lembaga sekolah. .

Kanada mempunyai kurang daripada tujuh puluh huruf.


Premise: "This newsletter has been produced to help explain the changes in the biology curriculum. Unfortunately, a great deal of misinformation has been spread regarding this policy. We hope this publication will help those interested better understand the substance of the policy while eliminating any misconceptions some may have about the curriculum change. We sincerely appreciate your understanding on this matter."

Hypothesis: some of the info is inacurate as it pertains to the curriculum

"Surat berita ini telah dihasilkan untuk membantu menjelaskan perubahan dalam kurikulum biologi. Malangnya, banyak maklumat salah telah tersebar mengenai dasar ini. Kami berharap penerbitan ini akan membantu mereka yang berminat untuk lebih memahami isi dasar itu sambil menghapuskan sebarang salah tanggapan sesetengah pihak. mungkin ada tentang perubahan kurikulum. Kami amat menghargai pemahaman anda tentang perkara ini."

sesetengah maklumat adalah tidak tepat kerana ia berkaitan dengan kurikulum


Premise: No. That's too amorphous a question. The issue here, I'll restate, is the veracity of the articles themselves, did the reporter hear the statement as reported. If it was taken out of context, we're not going to delve into that in this examination. The individual who believes -- who was quoted and believes the statement was taken out of context or flatly that he didn't or she didn't say it and it's inaccurate will have the opportunity to say that during the defendants case-in-chief or at any other time during the trial.

Hypothesis: The question is hard to answer

The question is too amorphous so it's hard to answer

Tidak. Itu soalan yang terlalu amorf. Isu di sini, saya akan nyatakan semula, adalah kebenaran artikel itu sendiri, adakah wartawan mendengar kenyataan seperti yang dilaporkan. Jika ia diambil di luar konteks, kita tidak akan menyelidikinya dalam peperiksaan ini. Individu yang percaya -- yang dipetik dan percaya kenyataan itu diambil di luar konteks atau secara terang-terangan bahawa dia tidak atau dia tidak mengatakannya dan ia tidak tepat akan berpeluang untuk mengatakan bahawa semasa ketua kes defendan atau pada bila-bila masa lain semasa perbicaraan.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, what the hon. member should know is what we said three weeks ago when the auditor general's report was tabled, namely that we have been at work in Health Canada for some years putting in place across the land technology to ensure that pharmacists will be able to ascertain that every prescription presented is legitimate and should be filled.

Hypothesis: Pharmacists would benefit from our efforts

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, apa yang Berhormat. ahli perlu tahu adalah apa yang kami katakan tiga minggu lalu apabila laporan ketua juruaudit dibentangkan, iaitu kami telah bekerja di Health Canada selama beberapa tahun melaksanakan teknologi tanah untuk memastikan ahli farmasi dapat memastikan bahawa setiap preskripsi dibentangkan adalah sah dan perlu diisi.

Ahli farmasi akan mendapat manfaat daripada usaha kami


Premise: Given the complexity of the issue, we all hope that tomorrow, when the Canadian and provincial ministers of health meet, they will able, first of all, to reach a consensus and then, let us hope, to initiate a settlement process that is satisfactory to victims and their families, and in keeping with the way our health institutions operate in Canada.

Hypothesis: Given the complexity of the issue, we all hope that tomorrow, when the Canadian and provincial ministers of health meet, they will able, first of all, to reach a consensus. Consensus means agreement.

Consensus by definition means agreement, so it is most definitely correct.

Memandangkan kerumitan isu ini, kita semua berharap esok, apabila menteri kesihatan Kanada dan wilayah bertemu, mereka akan dapat, pertama sekali, mencapai kata sepakat dan kemudian, marilah kita berharap, untuk memulakan proses penyelesaian yang memuaskan. kepada mangsa dan keluarga mereka, dan selaras dengan cara institusi kesihatan kita beroperasi di Kanada.

Memandangkan kerumitan isu ini, kita semua berharap esok, apabila menteri kesihatan Kanada dan wilayah bertemu, mereka akan dapat, pertama sekali, mencapai kata sepakat. Konsensus bermaksud persetujuan.


Premise: Well, we stand with Israel, but we have maintained the ability to serve as an honest broker. And one of the reasons that's important is that Israel cannot have direct dialogue with some of the people on the other side of conflicts, especially during times of tension, unless that dialogue comes through us. And if we throw away that ability to serve as an honest broker, then we have thrown -- we will have thrown away a strategic asset that's important not only to us but also to Israel.

Hypothesis: Israel does not have any silent letters in it.

It's true, you pronounce all of the letters in Israel.

Baiklah, kami menyokong Israel, tetapi kami telah mengekalkan keupayaan untuk berkhidmat sebagai broker yang jujur. Dan salah satu sebab yang penting ialah Israel tidak boleh berdialog secara langsung dengan beberapa orang di sisi lain konflik, terutamanya semasa ketegangan, melainkan dialog itu datang melalui kita. Dan jika kita membuang keupayaan itu untuk berkhidmat sebagai broker yang jujur, maka kita telah membuang -- kita akan membuang aset strategik yang penting bukan sahaja kepada kita tetapi juga kepada Israel.

Israel tidak mempunyai sebarang surat senyap di dalamnya.


Premise: As part of their function they are to consider the wishes and instructions of parliament which, if it supports this bill, will serve notice to both potential offenders and the courts that the representatives of the people are seriously concerned with the theft of motor vehicles to commit other offences and we have decided to pronounce additional condemnation.

Hypothesis: Parliament wants to crack down on car thieves by making penalties on offenders harsher so they won't commit more crimes in the future.

Parliament's wishes were to prevent criminals, particularly car thieves from reoffending by making punishments harsher. I think it was difficult for the system to guess because I changed a lot of the vocab words from the original sentence a lot.

Sebagai sebahagian daripada fungsi mereka, mereka adalah untuk mempertimbangkan hasrat dan arahan parlimen yang, jika ia menyokong rang undang-undang ini, akan memberikan notis kepada kedua-dua pesalah yang berpotensi dan mahkamah bahawa wakil rakyat amat prihatin dengan kecurian kenderaan bermotor untuk dilakukan. kesalahan lain dan kami telah memutuskan untuk melafazkan kutukan tambahan.

Parlimen mahu membanteras pencuri kereta dengan membuat hukuman lebih keras kepada pesalah supaya mereka tidak melakukan lebih banyak jenayah pada masa hadapan.


Premise: We travelled throughout Alberta to examine areas within our education system that we found to be discriminatory, inappropriate or racist, and to look into ways and means by which we could improve our education system to overcome the intolerance and lack of understanding that seemed to prevail in many areas of our province.

Hypothesis: The trip included multiple people

Kami mengembara ke seluruh Alberta untuk memeriksa kawasan dalam sistem pendidikan kami yang kami dapati sebagai diskriminasi, tidak sesuai atau perkauman, dan untuk melihat cara dan cara yang boleh kami perbaiki sistem pendidikan kami untuk mengatasi sikap tidak bertolak ansur dan kekurangan persefahaman yang kelihatan berlaku dalam banyak kawasan di wilayah kami.


Premise: It is unacceptable that francophones in the rest of Canada must go to court in order to gain recognition of their most essential rights, to receive an education and health care in their language, at a time when the French speaking community in Canada is more fragile than ever, as the latest census data prove.

Hypothesis: The French speaking citizens must go to court to enforce their rights.

I'm not sure why it was difficult.  The paragraph states that the French speaking citizens must go to court to have their essential rights enforced. The statement is correct.

Adalah tidak boleh diterima bahawa francophone di seluruh Kanada mesti pergi ke mahkamah untuk mendapatkan pengiktirafan hak mereka yang paling penting, untuk menerima pendidikan dan penjagaan kesihatan dalam bahasa mereka, pada masa masyarakat berbahasa Perancis di Kanada lebih rapuh daripada pernah, seperti yang dibuktikan oleh data banci terkini.

Rakyat berbahasa Perancis mesti pergi ke mahkamah untuk menguatkuasakan hak mereka.


Premise: We have Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser representing B.C., Paul Brewer, Leslie Hamill, Judith Scott representing NCR, Kevin King, Steve Covell representing the prairies, Mike Benoit, John Irving representing Ontario, Abdelkader Elkak, known as ElKak, Denis Dupre representing Quebec, Byrun Shandler representing the north, Nycole Turmel as an officer, and the negotiator is Luc David.

Hypothesis: Byrun Shandler is not the representative from Ontario.

Byrun Shandler represents the north, according to this passage. Someone else represents Ontario.

Kami mempunyai Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser mewakili B.C., Paul Brewer, Leslie Hamill, Judith Scott mewakili NCR, Kevin King, Steve Covell mewakili padang rumput, Mike Benoit, John Irving mewakili Ontario, Abdelkader Elkak, dikenali sebagai ElKak , Denis Dupre mewakili Quebec, Byrun Shandler mewakili utara, Nycole Turmel sebagai pegawai, dan perunding ialah Luc David.

Byrun Shandler bukan wakil dari Ontario.


Premise: The Prime Minister is dragging this issue out so he can avoid the whole debate about tax relief, simply because he would much rather spend that money and have his bureaucrats and people in government spend that money as opposed to leaving it in the pockets of individual Canadians who desperately need it.

Hypothesis: The prime minister is a male

It says in the original statement that the prime minister is a "he" which means that he is a male. I think the model got confused because it could not put the facts together.

Perdana Menteri sedang mengheret isu ini supaya beliau dapat mengelak keseluruhan perdebatan mengenai pelepasan cukai, semata-mata kerana beliau lebih suka membelanjakan wang itu dan meminta birokrat dan orang dalam kerajaan membelanjakan wang itu berbanding meninggalkannya di dalam poket individu Kanada. yang amat memerlukannya.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, my bill would amend the Food and Drugs Act and the Narcotic Control Act to impose minimum prison sentences of one year for a first offence and two years for a further offence in cases where a person is convicted of trafficking in a controlled or restricted drug or a narcotic within 500 metres of an elementary school or a high school.

Hypothesis: Sentences can be longer than three hours.

If minimum sentences can be one year in length, then it is definitely correct to say that sentences can be longer than three hours.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, rang undang-undang saya akan meminda Akta Makanan dan Dadah dan Akta Kawalan Narkotik untuk mengenakan hukuman penjara minimum setahun untuk kesalahan pertama dan dua tahun untuk kesalahan selanjutnya dalam kes di mana seseorang disabitkan kesalahan mengedar dalam kawalan atau dadah larangan atau narkotik dalam lingkungan 500 meter dari sekolah rendah atau sekolah menengah.

Ayat boleh lebih lama daripada tiga jam.


Premise: But the first and most important thing is to start creating jobs in America. The jobs the president is creating pay $9,000 less than the jobs that we're losing. And this is the first president in 72 years to preside over an economy in America that has lost jobs, 1. 6 million jobs.

Hypothesis: This president is not promoting job growth.

This is true, there is a decrease in jobs

Tetapi perkara pertama dan paling penting ialah mula mencipta pekerjaan di Amerika. Pekerjaan yang dibuat oleh presiden membayar $9,000 kurang daripada pekerjaan yang kita hilang. Dan ini adalah presiden pertama dalam 72 tahun untuk mempengerusikan ekonomi di Amerika yang telah kehilangan pekerjaan, 1. 6 juta pekerjaan.

Presiden ini tidak menggalakkan pertumbuhan pekerjaan.


Premise: The budgetary measures include tax relief for interest on all student loans, interest relief for more graduates, extended repayment periods for those who need them, extended interest relief periods for those who remain in financial difficulty and reductions in loan principal for those who still face financial difficulty.

Hypothesis: people who face financial difficulty need help

the budgetary measures will help those who still face financial difficulty

Langkah belanjawan termasuk pelepasan cukai untuk faedah ke atas semua pinjaman pelajar, pelepasan faedah untuk lebih ramai graduan, lanjutan tempoh pembayaran balik bagi mereka yang memerlukannya, lanjutan tempoh pelepasan faedah bagi mereka yang mengalami masalah kewangan dan pengurangan prinsipal pinjaman bagi mereka yang masih menghadapi masalah kewangan. kesukaran.

orang yang menghadapi masalah kewangan memerlukan bantuan


Premise: Whenever we are engaged in a conflict, or whenever we are contemplating a conflict which has the potential that this conflict has, we need to realize that it may well be a situation, no matter what the outcome, in which there are no winners and losers but rather a situation in which everybody loses when we choose war as an alternative to diplomacy.

Hypothesis: The speaker prefers diplomacy to war

Setiap kali kita terlibat dalam konflik, atau apabila kita memikirkan konflik yang mempunyai potensi konflik ini, kita perlu sedar bahawa ia mungkin satu situasi, tidak kira apa keputusannya, di mana tidak ada yang menang dan yang kalah. sebaliknya situasi di mana semua orang kalah apabila kita memilih perang sebagai alternatif kepada diplomasi.

Penceramah lebih suka diplomasi daripada berperang


Premise: As a final comment, I would also like to know how all of these changes that put greater emphasis on rehabilitation and community reformation, greater emphasis on alternative measures and putting the emphasis on the community services element now to help in the reformation of these young people, will be paid for.

Hypothesis: The speaker uses the word "emphasis" less than four times.

It's definitely correct because they only say it 3 times. It's difficult because the system might not understand which word I'm asking it to count I guess.

Sebagai ulasan terakhir, saya juga ingin tahu bagaimana semua perubahan ini yang memberi penekanan yang lebih besar kepada pemulihan dan reformasi komuniti, penekanan yang lebih kepada langkah-langkah alternatif dan memberi penekanan kepada elemen perkhidmatan masyarakat sekarang untuk membantu dalam reformasi golongan muda ini. , akan dibayar.

Penutur menggunakan perkataan "penekanan" kurang daripada empat kali.


Premise: Since the beginning of this parliament, every time they were given the opportunity, the members of the Bloc Quebecois-at least those who sit on the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade-have asked the government to be more transparent on this issue, by agreeing to table before parliament not only treaties like the ones dealing with extradition and social security, but all treaties.

Hypothesis: Bringing the treaties to the table will increase transparency

This is true because it says transparency increases

Sejak awal parlimen ini, setiap kali mereka diberi peluang, ahli-ahli Blok Quebecois-sekurang-kurangnya mereka yang menganggotai Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar Negeri dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa-telah meminta kerajaan lebih telus dalam isu ini, dengan bersetuju untuk membentangkan di hadapan parlimen bukan sahaja perjanjian seperti yang berkaitan dengan ekstradisi dan keselamatan sosial, tetapi semua perjanjian.

Membawa perjanjian ke meja akan meningkatkan ketelusan


Premise: On the hog environmental management strategy, for example, the Canadian government has put $2 million in that program along with $1 million from the industry itself to assist the industry to find ways the nutrients from hog operations in Canada can be best managed in the rural areas.

Hypothesis: The Canadian government has put in the majority of the $3 million put into that program.

Canada has put in $2m of the $3m put into the program making it the major contributor.  definitely correct.

Mengenai strategi pengurusan alam sekitar babi, sebagai contoh, kerajaan Kanada telah meletakkan $2 juta dalam program itu bersama-sama dengan $1 juta daripada industri itu sendiri untuk membantu industri mencari cara nutrien daripada operasi babi di Kanada boleh diuruskan dengan terbaik di kawasan luar bandar. .

Kerajaan Kanada telah memasukkan sebahagian besar daripada $3 juta yang dimasukkan ke dalam program itu.


Premise: Well, my intention would be to enter an order that is a wrap-around order, if you will, that is, in effect, a re-reconsideration of the order on the depositions but also speaks to the trial testimony in chief. And it will be abbreviated because of the time constraints on me, but we'll issue it forthwith, and it will indicate that you're going to -- they're going to sit for depositions under those circumstances.

Hypothesis: This context implies certain legal concerns

If the context is talking about depositions it follows that lawyers are definitely involved and this refers to a legal matter

Baiklah, hasrat saya adalah untuk memasukkan perintah yang merupakan perintah penutup, jika anda mahu, iaitu, sebenarnya, pertimbangan semula perintah mengenai deposisi tetapi juga bercakap kepada keterangan ketua perbicaraan. Dan ia akan dipendekkan kerana kekangan masa kepada saya, tetapi kami akan mengeluarkannya serta-merta, dan ia akan menunjukkan bahawa anda akan -- mereka akan duduk untuk deposit dalam keadaan tersebut.

Konteks ini membayangkan kebimbangan undang-undang tertentu


Premise: The measurement is not: Are we safer? The measurement is: Are we as safe as we ought to be? And there are a host of options that this president had available to him, like making sure that at all our ports in America containers are inspected. Only 95 percent of them -- 95 percent come in today uninspected. That's not good enough.

Hypothesis: Some people believe the president should inspect more containers.

Pengukurannya bukan: Adakah kita lebih selamat? Pengukurannya ialah: Adakah kita selamat seperti yang sepatutnya? Dan terdapat pelbagai pilihan yang disediakan oleh presiden ini untuknya, seperti memastikan bahawa di semua pelabuhan kami di Amerika kontena diperiksa. Hanya 95 peratus daripada mereka -- 95 peratus datang hari ini tanpa diperiksa. Itu tidak cukup baik.

Sesetengah orang percaya presiden harus memeriksa lebih banyak kontena.


Premise: I remember a lady in Houston, Texas, told me, "Reading is the new civil right," and she's right. In order to make sure people have jobs for the 21st century, we've got to get it right in the education system, and we're beginning to close a minority achievement gap now.

Hypothesis: The lady was from a Southern state.

Saya masih ingat seorang wanita di Houston, Texas, memberitahu saya, "Membaca adalah hak sivil baharu," dan dia betul. Untuk memastikan orang ramai mempunyai pekerjaan untuk abad ke-21, kita perlu memperbaikinya dalam sistem pendidikan, dan kita mula merapatkan jurang pencapaian minoriti sekarang.


Premise: As this Court explained 100 and some years ago in its Burrows-Giles opinion, such constructions are accorded very great weight and, as that Court went on to say, when consistent and unchallenged for over a century are almost conclusive that consistent construction by Congress of its authority under the Copyright and Patent Clause now has lasted from the 105th -- from the first through the 105th Congress.

Hypothesis: The court feels the same way about copyright laws as it did 50 years ago.

Seperti yang dijelaskan oleh Mahkamah ini 100 dan beberapa tahun yang lalu dalam pendapat Burrows-Gilesnya, pembinaan sedemikian diberi berat yang sangat besar dan, seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Mahkamah itu, apabila konsisten dan tidak dicabar selama lebih satu abad adalah hampir muktamad bahawa pembinaan yang konsisten oleh Kongres kuasanya di bawah Klausa Hak Cipta dan Paten kini telah berlangsung dari 105 -- dari yang pertama hingga Kongres ke-105.

Mahkamah merasakan perkara yang sama tentang undang-undang hak cipta seperti yang berlaku 50 tahun lalu.


Premise: The government has decided to make the changes required in two stages, and this part covers only what the government is almost forced to do as a signatory to the 1976 international convention, which was to come into force in 1990, but whose implementation was later postponed to March 31, 1996, at the latest.

Hypothesis: this agreement takes effect over many years

An agreement signed in 1976, that does not take effect until 1996 did  take many years (20). It was difficult because of the word many

Kerajaan telah memutuskan untuk membuat perubahan yang diperlukan dalam dua peringkat, dan bahagian ini hanya meliputi apa yang kerajaan hampir terpaksa lakukan sebagai penandatangan konvensyen antarabangsa 1976, yang akan berkuat kuasa pada 1990, tetapi pelaksanaannya kemudian ditangguhkan. hingga 31 Mac 1996, selewat-lewatnya.

perjanjian ini berkuat kuasa selama bertahun-tahun


Premise: No, but that's the Copyright Clause argument, and it seems to me you're saying, okay, we then apply that in First Amendment analysis, which allows us to make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument. If we don't accept the Copyright Clause retrospectivity argument --

Hypothesis: after the Copyright Clause argumen is paplied, it will allow them make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument.

according to the text,  apply that in First Amendment analysis, which "allows" us to make a coherent intermediate scrutiny argument, which makes the statement true.

Tidak, tetapi itu adalah hujah Klausa Hak Cipta, dan nampaknya saya anda katakan, okey, kami kemudian menggunakan itu dalam analisis Pindaan Pertama, yang membolehkan kami membuat hujah penelitian pertengahan yang koheren. Jika kami tidak menerima hujah retrospektiviti Klausa Hak Cipta --

selepas hujah Klausa Hak Cipta digunakan, ia akan membenarkan mereka membuat hujah penelitian pertengahan yang koheren.


Premise: The federal act, when it applies to Quebec and the other provinces, will affect federally regulated businesses-notably telephone companies, banks, airlines and interprovincial carriers-as well as all interprovincial and international personal data exchanges for business purposes.

Hypothesis: The Federal Act is exclusively in Canada.

By listing "Quebec", then "and the other provinces" you are implying that the other provinces are in the same country as the province of Quebec.

Akta persekutuan, apabila ia terpakai untuk Quebec dan wilayah lain, akan menjejaskan perniagaan yang dikawal selia oleh persekutuan-terutamanya syarikat telefon, bank, syarikat penerbangan dan pembawa antara wilayah-serta semua pertukaran data peribadi antara wilayah dan antarabangsa untuk tujuan perniagaan.

Akta Persekutuan adalah eksklusif di Kanada.


Premise: No child should be left behind in America. I want to make sure we rebuild our military to keep the peace. I worry about morale in today's military. The warning signs are clear. It is time to have a new commander in chief who will rebuild the military, pay our men and women more, make sure they're housed better and have a focused mission for our military.

Hypothesis: We may not be peaceful if we don't rebuild our military

definitely correct because the text says that to keep peace, we need to rebuild our military. Implies that we may not be peaceful if we don't rebuild our military.

Tiada kanak-kanak harus ditinggalkan di Amerika. Saya mahu memastikan kita membina semula tentera kita untuk menjaga keamanan. Saya bimbang tentang semangat dalam tentera hari ini. Tanda-tanda amaran adalah jelas. Sudah tiba masanya untuk mempunyai ketua komander baharu yang akan membina semula tentera, membayar lelaki dan wanita kita lebih banyak, memastikan mereka ditempatkan lebih baik dan mempunyai misi tertumpu untuk tentera kita.

Kita mungkin tidak akan aman jika kita tidak membina semula tentera kita


Premise: It was sometime in 2004. It was prior to the June meetings because my husband was a teacher at the school, so I often heard things that he would come home and tell me. So I knew that there was some discussion over the biology book, so sometime before that. I can't tell you exactly when.

Hypothesis: Her husband told her about what happened

This is correct. She states that her husband would come home and tell her what happened.

Ia adalah pada tahun 2004. Ia sebelum mesyuarat Jun kerana suami saya seorang guru di sekolah, jadi saya sering mendengar perkara yang dia akan pulang dan memberitahu saya. Jadi saya tahu bahawa terdapat beberapa perbincangan mengenai buku biologi, jadi kadang-kadang sebelum itu. Saya tidak boleh memberitahu anda dengan tepat bila.

Suaminya memberitahunya tentang apa yang berlaku


Premise: It is quite unfortunate that some members of this House feel they have a hierarchy that is higher than the ordinary Canadian, better than most members of Parliament, that they are in a preferred category of having the ideologies that speak better to all Canadians than other members.

Hypothesis: Some politicians think everyone else is wrong except them

Members of the House are being derided for thinking they have the only correct ideologies. I think the system had difficulty because I used unfamiliar phrasing

Adalah agak malang bahawa sesetengah ahli Dewan ini merasakan mereka mempunyai hierarki yang lebih tinggi daripada Kanada biasa, lebih baik daripada kebanyakan ahli Parlimen, bahawa mereka berada dalam kategori pilihan yang mempunyai ideologi yang bercakap lebih baik kepada semua orang Kanada daripada ahli lain. .

Sesetengah ahli politik menganggap orang lain salah kecuali mereka


Premise: Mr. Speaker, given Canada's historic role as a supporter of peace, a mosaic of different cultures and an international proponent of democracy incorporation, the petitioners feel it would be fully appropriate for Canada to join the ranks of peace blossoms worldwide with the symbolic designation as a peace nation.

Hypothesis: Supporting peace is very Canada thing to do.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, memandangkan peranan bersejarah Kanada sebagai penyokong keamanan, mozek budaya yang berbeza dan penyokong antarabangsa pemerbadanan demokrasi, para pempetisyen merasakan adalah sesuai sepenuhnya untuk Kanada menyertai barisan yang berkembang pesat di seluruh dunia dengan sebutan simbolik sebagai sebuah negara yang damai.

Menyokong keamanan adalah perkara yang perlu dilakukan oleh Kanada.


Premise: So there's a -- this is a society that -- of ours that's got to do a better job of teaching children right from wrong. And we can enforce law. But there seems to be a lot of preoccupation on -- not certainly only in this debate, but just in general on law.

Hypothesis: the law must be enforced

my statement is correct because the text says the law can be enforced

Jadi ada -- ini adalah masyarakat yang -- di kalangan kita perlu melakukan tugas yang lebih baik untuk mengajar kanak-kanak betul dari salah. Dan kita boleh menguatkuasakan undang-undang. Tetapi nampaknya terdapat banyak keasyikan tentang -- bukan sahaja dalam perbahasan ini, tetapi hanya secara umum mengenai undang-undang.


Premise: Your Honor, just one other clarification question. With regard to asking what they saw and heard with regard to all of the statements and the articles, I would assume that's statements made after the gavel banged and the meeting was over. Some of those quotes are afterwards.

Hypothesis: the statements are not clear so need to be asked what they saw and heard

they are not clear that's why the person wants to make clarifications

Yang Berhormat, hanya satu lagi soalan penjelasan. Berkenaan dengan bertanya apa yang mereka lihat dan dengar berkenaan dengan semua kenyataan dan artikel, saya akan menganggap itu kenyataan yang dibuat selepas palu dipukul dan mesyuarat selesai. Beberapa petikan itu selepas itu.

kenyataan tidak jelas jadi perlu ditanya apa yang mereka lihat dan dengar


Premise: No, absolutely not. I don't object to Pandas being in the library, just like I don't object to, you know, any of the other books being in the library, as long as -- as long as it's the appropriate level and -- you know, I mean, there is a censorship process that goes into putting books in the library. So, I mean, as long as it has gone through that process and it's approved to be there, I don't have a problem with it being there.

Hypothesis: The agent only wants books of the appropriate level in the library.

The agent stated that it doesn't object to books being in the library as long as they are the "appropriate level".  Therefore, the corollary statement is that only according to the agent only books of the "appropriate level" should be in the library.  The system was confused because the sentence said the same thing in the positive form, rather than the negative form used by the agent.

Tidak, sama sekali tidak. Saya tidak membantah Panda berada di perpustakaan, sama seperti saya tidak membantah, anda tahu, mana-mana buku lain berada di perpustakaan, selagi -- selagi tahap yang sesuai dan -- anda tahu, maksud saya, terdapat proses penapisan yang masuk ke dalam meletakkan buku di perpustakaan. Jadi, maksud saya, selagi ia telah melalui proses itu dan ia diluluskan untuk berada di sana, saya tidak mempunyai masalah untuk berada di sana.

Ejen hanya mahukan buku pada tahap yang sesuai di perpustakaan.


Premise: I think the administration did the right thing in that case. I do. It was a horrible situation, no one liked to see it on our TV screens, but it's a case where we need to make sure we have an early warning system in place in places where there could be ethnic cleansing and genocide the way we saw it there in Rwanda.

Hypothesis: What happened in Rwanda was made public so that many people would know about it.

It is stated that what happened was shown on TV, therefore many people in the public would have seen it and made aware of it.

Saya fikir pentadbiran telah melakukan perkara yang betul dalam kes itu. Saya sudi. Ia adalah situasi yang mengerikan, tiada siapa yang suka melihatnya di skrin TV kami, tetapi ini adalah kes di mana kami perlu memastikan kami mempunyai sistem amaran awal di tempat yang mungkin berlaku pembersihan etnik dan pembunuhan beramai-ramai seperti yang kami lihat. ada di Rwanda.

Apa yang berlaku di Rwanda didedahkan kepada umum supaya ramai orang tahu mengenainya.


Premise: We would assume that when we are dealing with Bill C-66, an act that deals with housing in Canada, there would be some reference or some indication that the government is actually going to do something about the homeless situation, but in fact the answer is that it is doing absolutely nothing.

Hypothesis: There needs to be more done about the homeless situation in Canada

True because the government has been doing nothing for the homeless situation

Kami akan menganggap bahawa apabila kami berurusan dengan Rang Undang-Undang C-66, akta yang berkaitan dengan perumahan di Kanada, akan ada beberapa rujukan atau beberapa petunjuk bahawa kerajaan sebenarnya akan melakukan sesuatu tentang keadaan gelandangan, tetapi sebenarnya jawapannya. ialah ia tidak melakukan apa-apa.

Perlu dilakukan lebih banyak tentang keadaan gelandangan di Kanada


Premise: The CBO said very clearly that if you were to adopt the president's plan, there would be a $2 trillion hole in Social Security, because today's workers pay in to the system for today's retirees. And the CBO said -- that's the Congressional Budget Office; it's bipartisan -- they said that there would have to be a cut in benefits of 25 percent to 40 percent.

Hypothesis: The cut in benefits could be 32.7%.

The cut in benefits would be between 25 and 40 percent, therefore any potential number in between (such as 32.7%) would be definitely correct.  If the statement had instead been "The cut in benefits *will* be 32.7%" rather than "The cut in benefits *could* be 32.7%" then that would be a different matter.

CBO berkata dengan jelas bahawa jika anda menerima pakai rancangan presiden, akan ada lubang $2 trilion dalam Keselamatan Sosial, kerana pekerja hari ini membayar masuk ke sistem untuk pesara hari ini. Dan CBO berkata -- itulah Pejabat Belanjawan Kongres; ia adalah dua parti -- mereka berkata bahawa perlu ada pengurangan faedah sebanyak 25 peratus hingga 40 peratus.


Premise: From March 4, 1993, when the damage control operation began, through the orchestrated in-house investigation, through the conceiving, conspiring, conniving and sanctioning of lies and misinformation, through the tampering with documents and the destruction of evidence, to the successful campaign to shut down the Somalia inquiry, people in high places for whom we are ultimately responsible have evaded accountability, escaped responsibility and eluded the efforts of properly constituted civilian authority - Parliament, government, a Royal Commission - to establish the truth.

Hypothesis: The investigation was about controlling what negative actions had already happened.

Mulai 4 Mac 1993, apabila operasi kawalan kerosakan bermula, melalui penyiasatan dalaman yang dirancang, melalui penyiasatan, konspirasi, berkomplot dan membenarkan pembohongan dan maklumat salah, melalui pengubahan dokumen dan pemusnahan bukti, kepada kempen yang berjaya. untuk menutup siasatan Somalia, orang di tempat tinggi yang kita bertanggungjawab akhirnya telah mengelak akauntabiliti, melepaskan tanggungjawab dan mengelak daripada usaha pihak berkuasa awam yang dibentuk dengan betul - Parlimen, kerajaan, Suruhanjaya Diraja - untuk menegakkan kebenaran.

Siasatan adalah tentang mengawal tindakan negatif yang telah berlaku.


Premise: The best way to take the pressure off our troops is to succeed in Iraq, is to train Iraqis so they can do the hard work of democracy, is to give them a chance to defend their country, which is precisely what we're doing. We'll have 125,000 troops trained by the end of this year.

Hypothesis: They are going to get 120,000 + 5,000 troops

120,000 + 5,000 is 125,000 troops. Which is the amount said to be gotten/trained. I think the model got confused by having to add addition.

Cara terbaik untuk menghilangkan tekanan daripada tentera kita adalah untuk berjaya di Iraq, adalah untuk melatih rakyat Iraq supaya mereka boleh melakukan kerja keras demokrasi, adalah untuk memberi mereka peluang untuk mempertahankan negara mereka, yang sebenarnya adalah apa yang kita lakukan. Kami akan mempunyai 125,000 tentera dilatih menjelang akhir tahun ini.

Mereka akan mendapat 120,000 + 5,000 tentera


Premise: I am pleased to respond to the motion by the member for Skeena. The member has asked that the government ignore years of consultation, negotiation and goodwill and extend the uncertainty even longer by sending the Nisga'a final agreement to a procedure heavy referendum in British Columbia.

The narrator is not the person who told the government to ignore that stuff, it was a member.

Saya berbesar hati untuk menjawab usul oleh ahli untuk Skeena. Ahli tersebut telah meminta kerajaan mengabaikan perundingan, rundingan dan muhibah selama bertahun-tahun dan memanjangkan ketidakpastian itu lebih lama lagi dengan menghantar perjanjian akhir Nisga'a kepada prosedur referendum berat di British Columbia.

Pencerita bukanlah orang yang menyuruh kerajaan mengabaikan perkara itu


Premise: It is a very controversial issue for some, but when looking at the cases and the circumstances it becomes very clear that the issue about whether or not Canada should be considering something like consecutive sentencing as opposed to concurrent sentencing becomes a very relevant and valid debate for this place.

Hypothesis: Canada might vote that criminals should now serve sentences out for all their crimes.

Canada should be considering something like consecutive sentencing.  Consecutive sentencing is when sentences run consecutively, defendants have to finish serving the sentence for one offense before they start serving the sentence for any other offense.

Ia adalah isu yang sangat kontroversi bagi sesetengah orang, tetapi apabila melihat kes dan keadaan, ia menjadi sangat jelas bahawa isu tentang sama ada Kanada harus mempertimbangkan sesuatu seperti hukuman berturut-turut berbanding dengan hukuman serentak menjadi perdebatan yang sangat relevan dan sah untuk tempat ini.

Kanada mungkin mengundi bahawa penjenayah kini harus menjalani hukuman untuk semua jenayah mereka.


Premise: Yes, but all of the history of the development of these clauses suggests that -- and this Court has indicated in its decisions with respect to copyright, that the Framers were concerned and the Congress is legitimately concerned not just in providing the spark of creativity, but to make sure that that's distributed widely and available, and there may be many reasons why -- we're -- we --

Hypothesis: This passage is an incomplete thought.

There is no ending here, definitely correct.

Ya, tetapi semua sejarah perkembangan fasal ini menunjukkan bahawa -- dan Mahkamah ini telah menyatakan dalam keputusannya berkenaan dengan hak cipta, bahawa Penggubal prihatin dan Kongres secara sah mengambil berat bukan hanya dalam menyediakan cetusan kreativiti, tetapi untuk memastikan bahawa ia diedarkan secara meluas dan tersedia, dan mungkin terdapat banyak sebab mengapa -- kami -- kami --

Petikan ini adalah pemikiran yang tidak lengkap.


Premise: If he takes that position he also runs the risk that should at some point in the future his situation change so that he cannot continue to operate without some sort of temporary closure or a long term closure, he has now opened himself up for all kinds of legal liability, lawsuits and persecution in the courts.

Hypothesis: Long term closure would make legal liability less likely.

The system may see the two terms close to each other and not see how they actually effect outcomes.

Jika dia mengambil kedudukan itu, dia juga menghadapi risiko yang pada masa akan datang keadaannya berubah sehingga dia tidak boleh terus beroperasi tanpa penutupan sementara atau penutupan jangka panjang, dia kini telah membuka diri untuk semua jenis liabiliti undang-undang, tindakan undang-undang dan penganiayaan di mahkamah.

Penutupan jangka panjang akan menjadikan liabiliti undang-undang kurang berkemungkinan.


Premise: There have also been increases in the registered education savings plan, the homebuyers plan, the part time education deductions, the child care expense deductions, and, as I mentioned already, the caregiver tax credit which provides, as it states here, a new refundable tax credit up to $400 per caregiver.

Hypothesis: If you are a parent, you could receive up to $400 in tax credits.

There is a a new refundable tax credit up to $400 per caregiver.

Terdapat juga peningkatan dalam pelan simpanan pendidikan berdaftar, pelan pembeli rumah, potongan pendidikan sambilan, potongan perbelanjaan penjagaan kanak-kanak, dan, seperti yang telah saya nyatakan, kredit cukai pengasuh yang menyediakan, seperti yang dinyatakan di sini, bayaran balik baharu kredit cukai sehingga $400 setiap penjaga.

Jika anda seorang ibu bapa, anda boleh menerima sehingga $400 dalam bentuk kredit cukai.


Premise: It is all a matter of definition, but we feel, and this is the mandate we received, that in order to provide service, to improve service, to invest in research and development of new products and services, to raise and to modernize the equipment that we use, for which we need capital, we should generate enough revenue, enough earnings, to provide for that at no cost to the taxpayers.

Hypothesis: The service/product-provider here has ties to the government.

The passage says they should be able to deliver "at no cost to the taxpayers", which means there could be a cost to the taxpayers, which means they have some sort of tie to a local, state or federal government. Only the government has the power to tax.

Ini semua adalah masalah definisi, tetapi kami merasakan, dan ini adalah mandat yang kami terima, bahawa untuk menyediakan perkhidmatan, untuk meningkatkan perkhidmatan, untuk melabur dalam penyelidikan dan pembangunan produk dan perkhidmatan baru, untuk meningkatkan dan memodenkan peralatan. yang kita gunakan, yang kita perlukan modal, kita harus menjana hasil yang mencukupi, pendapatan yang mencukupi, untuk menyediakannya tanpa kos kepada pembayar cukai.

Pembekal perkhidmatan/produk di sini mempunyai hubungan dengan kerajaan.


Premise: I'd like to come back to the question of nation building, but let me address the question directly, first. Fine. We did, actually, send troops into Rwanda to help with the humanitarian relief measures. My wife Tipper, who is here, actually went on a military plane with General Sholicatchvieli on one of those flights.

Hypothesis: Tipper contains a t

Saya ingin kembali kepada persoalan pembinaan negara, tetapi biarlah saya menjawab soalan itu secara langsung, terlebih dahulu. baiklah. Kami sebenarnya menghantar tentera ke Rwanda untuk membantu dengan langkah bantuan kemanusiaan. Isteri saya Tipper, yang berada di sini, sebenarnya menaiki pesawat tentera dengan Jeneral Sholicatchvieli dalam salah satu penerbangan itu.


Premise: I think that we have to put more emphasis on early learning and pre-school. Now, here is how that connects with all the rest of what we've been talking about. If you have -- if you squander the surplus on a huge tax cut that goes mostly to those at the top, then you can't make education the top priority.

Hypothesis: early learning and pre-school are important to them.

according to the text, they think that we have to put more emphasis on early learning and pre-school. when you want to put more emphasis on something it is because it is important to you.

Saya berpendapat bahawa kita perlu memberi lebih penekanan kepada pembelajaran awal dan prasekolah. Sekarang, inilah caranya berhubung dengan semua perkara yang lain yang telah kita bincangkan. Jika anda ada -- jika anda mensia-siakan lebihan untuk potongan cukai yang besar yang kebanyakannya diberikan kepada mereka yang berada di atas, maka anda tidak boleh menjadikan pendidikan sebagai keutamaan.

pembelajaran awal dan prasekolah adalah penting bagi mereka.


Premise: I will not do anything to affect the rights of hunters or sportsmen. I think that homeowners have to be respected and their right to have a gun if they wish to. The problem I see is that there are too many guns getting into the hands of children, and criminals, and people who, for whatever reason, some kind of history of stalking or domestic abuse really should not be able to get guns.

Hypothesis: The issue is gun control

Saya tidak akan melakukan apa-apa untuk menjejaskan hak pemburu atau ahli sukan. Saya berpendapat bahawa pemilik rumah perlu dihormati dan hak mereka untuk memiliki senjata jika mereka mahu. Masalah yang saya lihat ialah terdapat terlalu banyak senjata api yang jatuh ke tangan kanak-kanak, dan penjenayah, dan orang yang, atas sebab apa pun, beberapa jenis sejarah mengintai atau penderaan rumah tangga benar-benar tidak sepatutnya boleh mendapatkan senjata api.


Premise: I think the IMF has got a role in the world, but I don't want to see the IMF out there as a way to say to world bankers, if you make a bad loan, we'll bail you out. It needs to be available for emergency situations. I thought the President did the right thing with Mexico and was very strongly supportive of the administration in Mexico.

Hypothesis: The IMF deals with helping out countries.

The IMF bails out countries. The system was confused by the context.

Saya fikir IMF telah mendapat peranan di dunia, tetapi saya tidak mahu melihat IMF di luar sana sebagai satu cara untuk mengatakan kepada jurubank dunia, jika anda membuat pinjaman yang tidak baik, kami akan menyelamatkan anda. Ia perlu tersedia untuk situasi kecemasan. Saya fikir Presiden melakukan perkara yang betul dengan Mexico dan sangat menyokong pentadbiran di Mexico.


Premise: I'm really strongly committed to clean water and clean air, and cleaning up the new kinds of challenges like global warming. He is right that I'm not in favor of energy taxes. I am in favor of tax cuts to encourage and give incentives for the quicker development of these new kinds of technologies.

Hypothesis: The speaker will encourage the use of tax cuts.

The speaker is in favor of tax cuts and will use them to encourage development of new technologies.

Saya benar-benar komited untuk membersihkan air dan udara bersih, dan membersihkan jenis cabaran baharu seperti pemanasan global. Dia betul bahawa saya tidak memihak kepada cukai tenaga. Saya memihak kepada pemotongan cukai untuk menggalakkan dan memberi insentif untuk pembangunan lebih pantas bagi jenis teknologi baharu ini.

Penceramah akan menggalakkan penggunaan pemotongan cukai.


Premise: However many days that young girl in Florida stood in her classroom, however long, even if it was only one day, doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of overcrowded classrooms in America and we need to do something about that. There are seniors who pay more for their prescriptions than a lot of other people, more than their pets, sometimes.

Hypothesis: A child stands in a classroom because it is overcrowded.

The article uses the example of a child in Florida having to stand because of overcrowding. The model didn't understand the argument being made [it wasn't stated directly].

Walau bagaimana pun beberapa hari gadis muda di Florida itu berdiri di dalam bilik darjahnya, walau bagaimanapun lamanya, walaupun hanya satu hari, tidak mengubah hakikat bahawa terdapat banyak bilik darjah yang sesak di Amerika dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu untuk itu. Terdapat warga emas yang membayar lebih untuk preskripsi mereka daripada ramai orang lain, lebih daripada haiwan peliharaan mereka, kadangkala.

Seorang kanak-kanak berdiri di dalam kelas kerana terlalu sesak.


Premise: Well, because, like I said, my husband had been a teacher at the school, and he had sort of been directed by the high school principal to attend the meeting in support of the different things that were happening. There were other textbooks that were being adopted and controversies over them, and, you know, it was sort of a rallying thing, I suppose. And I went along because I live in the district, I pay taxes in the district, my children attend school in the district. I'm an educator, and I was curious about what was happening.

Hypothesis: school contains an o

Baiklah, kerana, seperti yang saya katakan, suami saya pernah menjadi guru di sekolah itu, dan dia telah diarahkan oleh pengetua sekolah menengah untuk menghadiri mesyuarat itu bagi menyokong pelbagai perkara yang berlaku. Terdapat buku teks lain yang diterima pakai dan kontroversi mengenainya, dan, anda tahu, ia adalah sejenis perkara yang menarik, saya rasa. Dan saya ikut kerana saya tinggal di daerah, saya membayar cukai di daerah, anak saya bersekolah di daerah. Saya seorang pendidik, dan saya ingin tahu tentang apa yang berlaku.


Premise: Well, in numerous ways. First, as a teacher, professionally, I feel that teachers in general are harmed, myself, as well, because there's a dichotomy here in what they're saying about this statement that they have passed on intelligent design as they're not teaching it.

Hypothesis: The individual here is speaking from person experience.

This is true, they are a teacher and speaking of their experience

Nah, dalam pelbagai cara. Pertama, sebagai seorang guru, secara profesional, saya merasakan bahawa guru secara amnya dirugikan, saya sendiri, juga, kerana terdapat dikotomi di sini dalam apa yang mereka katakan tentang kenyataan ini bahawa mereka telah menyampaikan reka bentuk pintar kerana mereka tidak mengajarnya .

Individu di sini bercakap dari pengalaman orang.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I present to the House a petition signed by many of my constituents who are asking that section 13(5) of the Canada Post Corporation Act be repealed so that rural route mail couriers are allowed to have collective bargaining rights in the same manner as private sector workers who deliver mail in rural areas.

Hypothesis: The petition was signed numerous times.

A petition signed by many of my constituents. The system was confused by the wording.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya membentangkan kepada Dewan petisyen yang ditandatangani oleh ramai pengundi saya yang meminta seksyen 13(5) Akta Perbadanan Pos Kanada dimansuhkan supaya kurier mel laluan luar bandar dibenarkan mempunyai hak tawar-menawar kolektif dalam perkara yang sama. cara sebagai pekerja sektor swasta yang menghantar surat di kawasan luar bandar.

Petisyen itu ditandatangani berkali-kali.


Premise: If we have allies in the Balkans we have allies, NATO, ready, willing and able to go and carry a big part of the burden. In Africa we did not. Now, we have tried -- our countries tried to create an Africa crisis response team there, and we've met some resistance.

Hypothesis: Africa is not an ally with The narrator's home country

No The narrator's home country was met with resistance in Africa

Jika kita mempunyai sekutu di Balkan, kita mempunyai sekutu, NATO, bersedia, sanggup dan mampu untuk pergi dan memikul sebahagian besar beban. Di Afrika kami tidak melakukannya. Sekarang, kami telah mencuba -- negara kami cuba mewujudkan pasukan tindak balas krisis Afrika di sana, dan kami telah menemui beberapa tentangan.

Afrika bukan sekutu dengan negara asal narator


Premise: Recently Quebec agricultural producers, processors, and distributors, as well as the UPA and MAPAQ, came up with an initial proposal: with the OECD showing more flexibility, the United States taking a tougher stance, and little give from Asia, Japan and Europe, the UPA is calling for the status quo.

Hypothesis: It took team work to come up with an initial proposal

Recently Quebec agricultural producers, processors, and distributors, as well as the UPA and MAPAQ, came up with an initial proposal which means there was team work so it is correct.

Baru-baru ini pengeluar, pemproses dan pengedar pertanian Quebec, serta UPA dan MAPAQ, telah mengemukakan cadangan awal: dengan OECD menunjukkan lebih fleksibiliti, Amerika Syarikat mengambil sikap yang lebih tegas, dan sedikit pemberian daripada Asia, Jepun dan Eropah, UPA menyeru kepada status quo.

Ia memerlukan kerja berpasukan untuk menghasilkan cadangan awal


Premise: I did not view and do not view the law as providing that there is some exhaustion requirement, although I understand some cases have said that. In this particular fact situation -- and I do think, I will say, on the issue of precedent, you can distinguish cases of -- and I'm not so sure I would be as fearful as some might be as to precedential value. I think this case is somewhat distinguishable, and I don't know that a judge in another situation would knee-jerk allow this type of testimony. We are in a very unique situation here, and that's what we have.

Hypothesis: The person does not agree with the law

Saya tidak melihat dan tidak melihat undang-undang sebagai memperuntukkan bahawa terdapat beberapa keperluan keletihan, walaupun saya faham beberapa kes telah mengatakannya. Dalam situasi fakta khusus ini -- dan saya fikir, saya akan katakan, mengenai isu duluan, anda boleh membezakan kes -- dan saya tidak begitu pasti saya akan takut seperti yang mungkin ada pada nilai terdahulu. Saya rasa kes ini agak boleh dibezakan, dan saya tidak tahu bahawa seorang hakim dalam situasi lain akan tergesa-gesa membenarkan kesaksian jenis ini. Kami berada dalam situasi yang sangat unik di sini, dan itulah yang kami ada.

Orang itu tidak bersetuju dengan undang-undang


Premise: I heard the member for Mississauga South just now and earlier during question period the hon. Secretary of State for International Financial Institutions suggest that among other things the budget would somehow take 600,000 low income Canadians off the tax rolls by allegedly raising the basic personal exemption.

Hypothesis: Poor people would overall pay less with the new budget due to changes in the basic exemption.

Based on the text, poor people will be removed from the tax rolls due to changes in the budget.

Saya mendengar ahli untuk Mississauga South tadi dan lebih awal semasa tempoh soalan hon. Setiausaha Negara bagi Institusi Kewangan Antarabangsa mencadangkan bahawa antara lain bajet itu entah bagaimana akan mengeluarkan 600,000 rakyat Kanada yang berpendapatan rendah daripada daftar cukai dengan didakwa menaikkan pengecualian peribadi asas.

Orang miskin secara keseluruhan akan membayar lebih sedikit dengan belanjawan baharu disebabkan perubahan dalam pengecualian asas.


Premise: If a bank or an insurance company acts in a fiduciary and responsible manner and must abide by the rules and regulations of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, then surely a crown corporation should be no less concerned about the security of the money it invests.

Hypothesis: The rules need to be obliged to by the bank

Correct because it clearly states that there are rules that need to be abided by

Sekiranya bank atau syarikat insurans bertindak secara fidusiari dan bertanggungjawab dan mesti mematuhi peraturan dan peraturan Pejabat Penguasa Institusi Kewangan, maka pastinya perbadanan mahkota tidak kurang mengambil berat tentang keselamatan wang yang dilaburkannya. .


Premise: I'm not for gay marriage. I think marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman. And I appreciated the way the administration signed the Defense of Marriage Act. I presume the Vice President supported it when the President signed that bill and supports it now.

Hypothesis: The Vice president works with the President.

The Vice President signs Bills and so does the President.  I presume the Vice President supported it when the President signed that bill and supports it now.

Saya bukan untuk perkahwinan gay. Saya fikir perkahwinan adalah institusi suci antara lelaki dan seorang wanita. Dan saya menghargai cara pentadbiran menandatangani pertahanan Akta Perkahwinan. Saya menganggap naib presiden menyokongnya apabila presiden menandatangani rang undang -undang itu dan menyokongnya sekarang.


Premise: "Question: Is there anything else that the board has done here in connection with the curriculum change that provides a basis for your complaint? "Answer: From what I can see from attending the board meetings, I don't know, because so much of the curriculum debate takes place at non-public meetings that I am not aware of. And when board members are questioned at meetings, they really don't answer any questions. So it gives this whole illusion of secrecy to the process, which, you know, may be a big part of the problem. It may just be a big misunderstanding."

Hypothesis: There is not unanimous agreement on the matter of the curriculum change.

The paragraph discusses questions and debate on the curriculum change, meaning there is most definitely not unanimous agreement.  So my statement is definitely correct.  I'm not sure why the agent is confused.  Perhaps they aren't that familiar with the specific vocabulary I used to try to trick them, like "unanimous agreement" being an antonym for debate.

"Soalan: Adakah terdapat apa-apa lagi yang lembaga telah lakukan di sini berkaitan dengan perubahan kurikulum yang menyediakan asas untuk aduan anda? "Jawapan: Apa yang saya dapat lihat daripada menghadiri mesyuarat lembaga, saya tidak tahu, kerana begitu banyak perbahasan kurikulum berlaku di mesyuarat bukan umum yang saya tidak sedar. Dan apabila ahli lembaga disoal dalam mesyuarat, mereka benar-benar tidak menjawab sebarang soalan. Jadi ia memberikan keseluruhan ilusi kerahsiaan ini kepada proses, yang, anda tahu, mungkin merupakan sebahagian besar daripada masalah itu. Ia mungkin hanya salah faham yang besar."

Tidak ada persetujuan sebulat suara mengenai perkara perubahan kurikulum.


Premise: And to make sure our society is as hopeful as it possibly can be, every single child in America must be educated. I mean every child. It starts with making sure every child learns to read. K-2 diagnostic testing so we know whether or not there's a deficiency.

Hypothesis: Every child includes those that are immigrants.

This is correct because they say it twice, every child, so it means it doesn't matter what you are, you have a right to be educated.

Dan untuk memastikan masyarakat kita mempunyai harapan seperti yang mungkin, setiap kanak-kanak di Amerika mesti dididik. Maksud saya setiap kanak-kanak. Ia bermula dengan memastikan setiap kanak-kanak belajar membaca. Ujian diagnostik K-2 supaya kita tahu sama ada terdapat kekurangan atau tidak.

Setiap kanak-kanak termasuk mereka yang merupakan pendatang.


Premise: I must say, not having had the courtesy to be informed of the content of the motion, and having presented the House with a request twice today and having been refused twice by the government, the Progressive Conservatives and the separatists, I find it totally irresponsible at this time of the night that the government plays this little dumb game with the House of Commons.

Hypothesis: The speaker presented the House with a request two times in one day.

The original statement says "having presented the House with a request twice today," indicating that the request was performed two times in one day. The system was fooled by this because it was looking for the word "twice," not "two."

Saya mesti katakan, kerana tidak mempunyai ihsan untuk dimaklumkan tentang kandungan usul itu, dan telah mengemukakan permohonan kepada Dewan dua kali hari ini dan telah ditolak dua kali oleh kerajaan, Konservatif Progresif dan pemisah, saya mendapati ia sama sekali tidak bertanggungjawab. pada waktu malam ini kerajaan memainkan permainan bodoh ini dengan Dewan Rakyat.

Penceramah menyampaikan permintaan kepada Dewan dua kali dalam satu hari.


Premise: I would hope so. And as far as I know, that is the case, because Dover says that it is a standards-based school, and so I assume that when they say that and they say that students have to pass certain material before they can be advanced into new material, that they would have to be abiding by the state standards.

Hypothesis: Graduates from Dover have aquired the knowledge and learning required by state standards.

As per the context, Dover is a state school abiding by state standards, and graduation requires the student to have passed those standards.

Saya harap begitu. Dan setakat yang saya tahu, itulah kesnya, kerana Dover mengatakan bahawa ia adalah sekolah berasaskan standard, dan oleh itu saya menganggap bahawa apabila mereka mengatakan itu dan mereka mengatakan bahawa pelajar perlu lulus bahan tertentu sebelum mereka boleh dimajukan kepada yang baru. material, bahawa mereka perlu mematuhi piawaian negeri.

Graduan dari Dover telah memperoleh pengetahuan dan pembelajaran yang diperlukan oleh piawaian negeri.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I was pointing out that today, as we are debating the estimates, when we think the most important issue facing parliament is the spending of the public purse, the approving of taxation and the spending of $145 billion of taxpayer money, we would take that very seriously in our debates in the House of Commons.

Hypothesis: They are trying to come to an agreement about spending and taxation.

It states "as we are debating the estimates, when we think the most important issue facing parliament is the spending of the public purse, the approving of taxation" therefore the debates are trying to reach a agreement on spending and taxation.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya menegaskan bahawa hari ini, semasa kita membahaskan anggaran, apabila kita fikir isu paling penting yang dihadapi parlimen ialah perbelanjaan wang awam, kelulusan cukai dan perbelanjaan wang pembayar cukai $145 bilion, kita akan mengambil serius perkara itu dalam perbahasan kami di Dewan Rakyat.

Mereka cuba mencapai persetujuan tentang perbelanjaan dan cukai.


Premise: So I think first and foremost our power ought to be wielded to in ways that form a more perfect union. The power of example is America's greatest power in the world. And that means, for example, standing up for human rights. It means addressing the problems of injustice and inequity, along the lines of race and ethnicity here at home, because in all these other places around the world where they're having these terrible problems, when they feel hope, it is often because they see in us a reflection of their potential.

Hypothesis: We need to focus on forming a more perfect union than we are doing right now.

The first sentence says "So I think first and foremost our power ought to be wielded to in ways that form a more perfect union."

Jadi saya fikir pertama sekali kuasa kita harus digunakan dengan cara yang membentuk kesatuan yang lebih sempurna. Kuasa teladan adalah kuasa terbesar Amerika di dunia. Dan ini bermakna, sebagai contoh, membela hak asasi manusia. Ini bermakna menangani masalah ketidakadilan dan ketidaksamaan, mengikut garis kaum dan etnik di negara ini, kerana di semua tempat lain di seluruh dunia di mana mereka menghadapi masalah yang dahsyat ini, apabila mereka berasa harapan, selalunya kerana mereka melihat dalam diri kita mencerminkan potensi mereka.

Kita perlu memberi tumpuan untuk membentuk kesatuan yang lebih sempurna daripada yang kita lakukan sekarang.


Premise: Honourable senators, I give notice that on Tuesday, September 21, 1999, I shall call the attention of the Senate to the financing of post-secondary education in Canada and particularly that portion of the financing that is borne by students, with a view to developing policies that will address and alleviate the debt load which post-secondary students are being burdened with in Canada.

Hypothesis: Canadian students could benefit from the Senate looking at student loans.

the senate is looking to alleviate student loan debt so students would obviously benefit, the AI doesn't have deductive reasoning capabilities... yet

Yang dihormati senator, saya memberi notis bahawa pada hari Selasa, 21 September 1999, saya akan memanggil perhatian Senat kepada pembiayaan pendidikan pasca menengah di Kanada dan khususnya bahagian pembiayaan yang ditanggung oleh pelajar, dengan tujuan untuk membangunkan dasar yang akan menangani dan meringankan beban hutang yang dibebankan oleh pelajar pasca menengah di Kanada.

Pelajar Kanada boleh mendapat manfaat daripada Senat melihat pinjaman pelajar.


Premise: Your Honor, one thing I might ask, since it is perhaps likely that issues are going to arise during the deposition, I'm wondering if we could now attempt to schedule the deposition at a time when everybody, including Your Honor, might be available to intercede.

Hypothesis: The speaker is attempting to influence a judge.

This is true. He says "your honor" which suggests he's speaking to a judge and what he says is an attempt to direct the actions of the judge

Yang Berhormat, satu perkara yang saya boleh tanya, memandangkan kemungkinan besar isu akan timbul semasa pemendapan, saya tertanya-tanya sama ada kita kini boleh cuba menjadualkan pemendapan pada masa semua orang, termasuk Yang Berhormat, mungkin tersedia. untuk memberi syafaat.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, the 70 million Canadian dollars now available in Quebec for millennium scholarships over a ten-year period are intended to benefit students from Quebec, particularly those in the greatest need and, combined with the financial assistance they are already receiving, reduce their level of indebtedness significantly.

Hypothesis: The scholarship money is only good for one decade.

This is definitely correct because the money was stated to be for millennium scholarships over a ten-year period, which is a decade.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, 70 juta dolar Kanada yang kini tersedia di Quebec untuk biasiswa milenium dalam tempoh sepuluh tahun bertujuan untuk memberi manfaat kepada pelajar dari Quebec, terutamanya mereka yang paling memerlukan dan, digabungkan dengan bantuan kewangan yang telah mereka terima, mengurangkan mereka. tahap keberhutangan dengan ketara.

Wang biasiswa hanya bagus untuk satu dekad.


Premise: If the federal government in its infinite wisdom-since it always knows more than anyone else about all issues relating to the environment-were to decide that we need to make an additional 5%, 6% or 7% reduction to industrial emissions, to toxic emissions in the atmosphere, under the agreements negotiated at Kyoto, on a uniform basis across Canada, this would be easily complied with by Alberta, where the emissions have increased in recent years.

Hypothesis: the speaker is using a sarcastic tone in regards to the government

it's clear from their use of language that they are being somewhat sarcastic

Jika kerajaan persekutuan dalam kebijaksanaannya yang tidak terhingga-kerana ia sentiasa mengetahui lebih daripada orang lain tentang semua isu yang berkaitan dengan alam sekitar-telah memutuskan bahawa kita perlu membuat pengurangan tambahan 5%, 6% atau 7% kepada pelepasan industri, kepada toksik pelepasan di atmosfera, di bawah perjanjian yang dirundingkan di Kyoto, secara seragam di seluruh Kanada, ini akan dipatuhi dengan mudah oleh Alberta, di mana pelepasan telah meningkat dalam beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini.

penceramah menggunakan nada sarkastik dalam hal kerajaan


Premise: The sense is that if we partner together effectively, if we build a relationship with First Nations and ask for their input and advice on taking the recommendations of the royal commission and building a plan of action together, engaging the provinces and the private sector, including Canadians in that process, we will find the solutions we need to ensure that aboriginal people are able to benefit from the wealth and prosperity of Canada.

Hypothesis: People from canada are a lot of times called canadians

Canadians are actually mentioned in the original statement, I think the model got confused because it was not directly implied.

Maksudnya ialah jika kita bekerjasama secara berkesan, jika kita membina hubungan dengan Negara-Negara Pertama dan meminta input dan nasihat mereka untuk mengambil cadangan suruhanjaya diraja dan membina pelan tindakan bersama, melibatkan wilayah dan sektor swasta, termasuk Orang Kanada dalam proses itu, kami akan mencari penyelesaian yang kami perlukan untuk memastikan orang asli dapat mendapat manfaat daripada kekayaan dan kemakmuran Kanada.

Orang dari kanada sering dipanggil Kanada


Premise: Take, for example, the ban on partial birth abortion. It's a brutal practice. People from both political parties came together in the halls of Congress and voted overwhelmingly to ban that practice. It made a lot of sense. My opponent, in that he's out of the mainstream, voted against that law.

Hypothesis: Citizens voted for the representation in congress that banned partial birth abortion.

Citizens vote for representation ins congress, this is how a democratic nation works. I'm sure the system is unfamiliar with the details of political ideology.

Ambil contoh, larangan pengguguran separa kelahiran. Ia satu amalan kejam. Orang ramai daripada kedua-dua parti politik berkumpul di dewan Kongres dan mengundi secara besar-besaran untuk mengharamkan amalan itu. Ia masuk akal. Lawan saya, kerana dia keluar dari arus perdana, mengundi menentang undang-undang itu.

Rakyat mengundi untuk perwakilan dalam kongres yang melarang pengguguran separa kelahiran.


Premise: However, no testimony shall relate to unpublished material or information or to the reporters' motivations, bias, mental impressions, or other information extrinsic to what the reporter saw and heard, and the reporter shall not be obligated to reveal any confidential sources.

Hypothesis: Reporters do not have to tell their political party.

The text say they do not have to reveal motivations or biases.

Walau bagaimanapun, tiada keterangan boleh berkaitan dengan bahan atau maklumat yang tidak diterbitkan atau dengan motivasi, berat sebelah, tanggapan mental, atau maklumat lain yang ekstrinsik kepada apa yang wartawan lihat dan dengar, dan wartawan tidak bertanggungjawab untuk mendedahkan sebarang sumber sulit.

Wartawan tidak perlu memberitahu parti politik mereka.


Premise: Out in the west, yeah. And so -- on the logging issue. That's not the way I would have done it. Perhaps some of that land needs to be set aside. But I certainly would have consulted with governors and elected officials before I would have acted unilaterally.

Hypothesis: Something was done about the logging issue.

The writer says "on the logging issue. That's not the way I would have done it." Which implies something was done on the logging issue. The model missed this logical inference.

Di barat, ya. Dan seterusnya -- mengenai isu pembalakan. Itu bukan cara yang saya akan lakukan. Mungkin sebahagian daripada tanah itu perlu diketepikan. Tetapi saya pasti akan berunding dengan gabenor dan pegawai yang dipilih sebelum saya akan bertindak secara unilateral.

Sesuatu telah dilakukan mengenai isu pembalakan.


Premise: The American middle-class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

Hypothesis: the matter being discussed affects many people

speaking about an entire class of people means a good number of people are involved in the subject matter

Keluarga kelas pertengahan Amerika tidak berjaya sekarang, Bob. Dan apa yang dikatakan presiden mengenai pemotongan cukai telah dihapuskan oleh peningkatan dalam penjagaan kesihatan, kenaikan petrol, kenaikan tuisyen, peningkatan ubat preskripsi.

perkara yang dibincangkan memberi kesan kepada ramai orang


Premise: The idea is that the construction and labour relations associations which are employer groups located in every province will meet with the building and construction unions and also with the non-union contractor associations in each province and try to find a consensus on a range of fair wages for every trade.

Hypothesis: union and non-union associations want the same thing

the union and non-union associations both want fair wages

Ideanya ialah persatuan pembinaan dan perhubungan buruh yang merupakan kumpulan majikan yang terletak di setiap wilayah akan bertemu dengan kesatuan bangunan dan pembinaan dan juga dengan persatuan kontraktor bukan kesatuan di setiap wilayah dan cuba mencari kata sepakat mengenai julat gaji yang adil untuk setiap dagangan.

persatuan kesatuan dan bukan kesatuan inginkan perkara yang sama


Premise: That the subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the week of April 19, 1999, to Kingston and Toronto during the week of May 10, 1999 and to Montreal and region during the week of May 24, 1999 and that the necessary staff accompany it.

Hypothesis: Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the year after 1998.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the year of 1999. The system was confused by the year.

Bahawa jawatankuasa kecil Akta Pembetulan dan Pelepasan Bersyarat diberikan kuasa untuk pergi ke Edmonton, Regina dan Winnipeg pada minggu 19 April 1999, ke Kingston dan Toronto pada minggu 10 Mei 1999 dan ke Montreal dan wilayah pada minggu 24 Mei 1999 dan kakitangan yang diperlukan mengiringinya.

Akta Pembetulan dan Pelepasan Bersyarat diberikan kuasa untuk pergi ke Edmonton, Regina dan Winnipeg pada tahun selepas 1998.


Premise: I was told that it was impossible to do because even though we had the rolling stock, we did not have the ability to deal with a union that had the opportunity to charge double time, triple time and all kinds of things on a train that was going across the country for two or three days.

Hypothesis: It was a very difficult task

They said it's impossible to do, hence it's very difficult

Saya diberitahu bahawa ia adalah mustahil untuk dilakukan kerana walaupun kami mempunyai stok, kami tidak mempunyai keupayaan untuk berurusan dengan kesatuan yang mempunyai peluang untuk mengenakan masa dua kali ganda, masa tiga kali ganda dan segala macam perkara di dalam kereta api yang pergi ke seluruh negara selama dua atau tiga hari.


Premise: This president has taken a $5. 6 trillion surplus and turned it into deficits as far as the eye can see. Health-care costs for the average American have gone up 64 percent; tuitions have gone up 35 percent; gasoline prices up 30 percent; Medicare premiums went up 17 percent a few days ago; prescription drugs are up 12 percent a year.

Hypothesis: The cost for medicare premiums have risen, proportionally, more than the cost of prescription drugs.

Medicare premiums have gone up by 17% but drug costs have only risen by 12%. It was likely difficult to determine because it needed to compare the two statements.

Presiden ini telah mengambil $5. 6 trilion lebihan dan mengubahnya menjadi defisit sejauh mata memandang. Kos penjagaan kesihatan untuk purata Amerika telah meningkat 64 peratus; tuisyen telah meningkat 35 peratus; harga petrol naik 30 peratus; Premium Medicare naik 17 peratus beberapa hari lalu; ubat preskripsi meningkat 12 peratus setahun.

Kos untuk premium perubatan telah meningkat, secara berkadar, lebih daripada kos ubat preskripsi.


Premise: Senators Joyal and De Ban know that, when Prime Minister Trudeau, thinking he had detected agreement among the provinces, even though Quebec was not a party, said that if he could get the support of the provinces and the members, he would not let the Senate prevent him from concluding an agreement.

Hypothesis: De Ban is not Prime minister

Senator Joyal dan De Ban tahu bahawa, apabila Perdana Menteri Trudeau, memikirkan dia telah mengesan persetujuan di antara wilayah, walaupun Quebec bukan sebuah parti, berkata bahawa jika dia boleh mendapatkan sokongan wilayah dan ahli, dia tidak akan membiarkan Senat menghalangnya daripada membuat perjanjian.


Premise: Modern legislation, however, frequently makes provision for the imposition of other types of fees or payment which, although not taxes in a strict sense, have enough of the characteristics of taxation to require to be treated as ``charges upon the people'' and therefore to be authorized by a Ways and Means resolution moved by a Minister of the Crown.

Hypothesis: Fees are not considered taxes.

the text says that fees are not taxes in a strict sense. I'm not sure why the system missed this one.

Perundangan moden, bagaimanapun, sering membuat peruntukan untuk mengenakan jenis fi atau pembayaran lain yang, walaupun bukan cukai dalam erti kata yang ketat, mempunyai ciri-ciri percukaian yang cukup untuk memerlukan untuk dianggap sebagai ``caj ke atas rakyat'' dan oleh itu untuk diberi kuasa melalui resolusi Cara dan Cara yang digerakkan oleh Menteri Mahkota.


Premise: These initiatives include: the Canada prenatal nutrition program; modernizing and strengthening the federal food safety program; improving the management and control of toxic substances in the environment, in food and in drinking water; continuing to explore innovative approaches in the area of rural and community health; and combating diabetes.

Hypothesis: there are six initiatives included

Inisiatif ini termasuk: program pemakanan pranatal Kanada; memodenkan dan mengukuhkan program keselamatan makanan persekutuan; menambah baik pengurusan dan kawalan bahan toksik dalam alam sekitar, dalam makanan dan dalam air minuman; terus meneroka pendekatan inovatif dalam bidang kesihatan luar bandar dan masyarakat; dan memerangi diabetes.


Premise: And yes, I think it's something that people need to consider. This isn't something new. I read a report, or a memo, from somebody in his 1988 campaign -- I forgot the fellow's name -- warning then Senator Gore to be careful about exaggerating claims. I thought during his debate with Senator Bradley saying he authored the EITC when it didn't happen.

Hypothesis: Al Gore was a member of Congress in 1988.

The passage states that Al Gore was a Senator in 1988, which means he was in Congress in 1988.

Dan ya, saya fikir ia adalah sesuatu yang perlu dipertimbangkan oleh orang ramai. Ini bukan sesuatu yang baru. Saya membaca laporan, atau memo, daripada seseorang dalam kempennya pada tahun 1988 -- saya terlupa nama rakan itu -- memberi amaran kepada Senator Gore ketika itu supaya berhati-hati tentang memperbesar-besarkan dakwaan. Saya fikir semasa perbahasannya dengan Senator Bradley mengatakan dia mengarang EITC apabila ia tidak berlaku.

Al Gore adalah ahli Kongres pada tahun 1988.


Premise: Over the past number of years we have raised numerous concerns about the very serious question of whether or not this aspect of government is doing its utmost to ensure that the food we eat, the water we drink, the drugs we have to take and the toys we play with are safe beyond a reasonable doubt.

Hypothesis: They listed 4 different examples of things that the government should be doing its utmost to ensure are safe beyond a reasonable doubt.

They listed food, water, drugs, and toys. That is 4 different examples. It's difficult because the system might not understand these are listed as examples.

Sejak beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini, kami telah menimbulkan pelbagai kebimbangan mengenai persoalan yang sangat serius sama ada aspek kerajaan ini melakukan yang terbaik untuk memastikan makanan yang kita makan, air yang kita minum, ubat-ubatan yang perlu kita ambil dan mainan. kita bermain dengan selamat tanpa keraguan yang munasabah.

Mereka menyenaraikan 4 contoh berbeza perkara yang kerajaan harus lakukan yang terbaik untuk memastikan selamat tanpa keraguan munasabah.


Premise: The difference is that while my plan starts with new accountability and maintains local control, it doesn't stop there. Because I want to give new choices to parents. To send their kids to college with a $10,000 tax deduction for college tuition per child per year.

Hypothesis: The tax deduction is $20,000 for parents with kids greater than 1 and less than 3.

The article says it's a $10,000 per child deduction, so if you have more than one child but less than three, you have 2  children and would get at $20,000 deduction, it is definitely correct.

Perbezaannya ialah walaupun rancangan saya bermula dengan akauntabiliti baharu dan mengekalkan kawalan tempatan, ia tidak berhenti di situ. Kerana saya ingin memberi pilihan baru kepada ibu bapa. Untuk menghantar anak-anak mereka ke kolej dengan potongan cukai $10,000 untuk tuisyen kolej bagi setiap kanak-kanak setahun.

Potongan cukai ialah $20,000 untuk ibu bapa yang mempunyai anak yang berumur lebih daripada 1 tahun dan kurang daripada 3 tahun.


Premise: I think it's a triumph. I thought the president made the right decision in joining NATO and bombing Serbia. I supported them when they did so. I called upon the Congress not to hamstring the administration, and in terms of forcing troop withdrawals on a timetable that wasn't necessarily in our best interest or fit our nation's strategy, and so I think it's good public policy, I think it worked, and I'm pleased I took -- made the decision I made.

Hypothesis: The President did not bomb Nato and join Serbia, it was the other way around.

The president did not bomb Nato and join Serbia, it was in fact the other way around - joined NATO and bombed Serbia.  Therefore the statement is definitely correct.

Saya rasa ia satu kejayaan. Saya fikir presiden membuat keputusan yang tepat dalam menyertai NATO dan mengebom Serbia. Saya menyokong mereka apabila mereka berbuat demikian. Saya menyeru Kongres untuk tidak menyekat pentadbiran, dan dari segi memaksa pengunduran tentera pada jadual waktu yang tidak semestinya untuk kepentingan terbaik kita atau sesuai dengan strategi negara kita, dan oleh itu saya fikir ia adalah dasar awam yang baik, saya fikir ia berkesan, dan saya gembira saya mengambil -- membuat keputusan yang saya buat.

Presiden tidak mengebom NATO dan menyertai Serbia, ia adalah sebaliknya.


Premise: It is my duty, pursuant to Standing Order 38, to inform the House that the questions to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment are as follows: the hon. member for Mississauga West, Youth Employment; the hon. member for Cumberland-Colchester, Airport Safety; the hon. member for Wetaskiwin, Aboriginal Affairs.

Hypothesis: There is only one number mentioned in the text, and that number is an even number.

Only the number 38 is mentioned, and that's an even number. It's difficult because the system probably does not know how to determine that only one number was mentioned.

Adalah menjadi kewajipan saya, menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat 38, untuk memaklumkan kepada Dewan bahawa soalan-soalan yang akan dibangkitkan pada malam ini pada masa penangguhan adalah seperti berikut: Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Mississauga West, Pekerjaan Belia; yang hon. ahli untuk Cumberland-Colchester, Keselamatan Lapangan Terbang; yang hon. ahli untuk Wetaskiwin, Hal Ehwal Orang Asli.

Terdapat hanya satu nombor yang disebut dalam teks, dan nombor itu ialah nombor genap.


Premise: The -- as we described in our brief, in pages 34 through 36, I believe it is in our brief, that the concerns about the limitation on exploitation and the limitation of a copyright period in Europe is based upon the country of origin of the work and the shortest time available.

Hypothesis: The brief was prepared by multiple people.

The writer says "as we described in our brief" - wording that indicates multiple authors. The model missed the pronouns' significance.

-- seperti yang kami terangkan dalam ringkasan kami, di halaman 34 hingga 36, saya percaya dalam ringkasan kami, kebimbangan mengenai pengehadan eksploitasi dan pengehadan tempoh hak cipta di Eropah adalah berdasarkan negara asal kerja dan masa terpendek yang ada.

Taklimat itu disediakan oleh ramai orang.


Premise: Let's go on the record. We are in chambers, and this is Let's go on the record. We are in chambers, and this is the matter of Kitzmiller, of course, versus Dover Area School District. We have assembled as planned with respect to the issue of certain subpoenas that have been issued to reporters Joseph Maldonado and Heidi Bernhard-Bubb.

Hypothesis: Two subponeas have been issued

Mari kita pergi ke rekod. Kami berada di dalam bilik, dan ini adalah Mari kita pergi dalam rekod. Kami berada di dalam bilik, dan ini adalah soal Kitzmiller, sudah tentu, berbanding Daerah Sekolah Kawasan Dover. Kami telah berhimpun seperti yang dirancang berkenaan dengan isu sepina tertentu yang telah dikeluarkan kepada wartawan Joseph Maldonado dan Heidi Bernhard-Bubb.


Premise: In fact, I'm for shrinking the size of government. I want a smaller and smarter government. I have been in charge of this reinventing government streamlining project that's reduced the size of government by more than 300,000 people in the last several years.

Hypothesis: The author does not like big governments

He is trying to make the government smaller

Sebenarnya, saya kerana mengecilkan saiz kerajaan. Saya mahu kerajaan yang lebih kecil dan bijak. Saya telah bertanggungjawab untuk mencipta semula projek memperkemas kerajaan ini yang telah mengurangkan saiz kerajaan sebanyak lebih daripada 300,000 orang dalam beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini.


Premise: Starting today, the government must follow the example set by one of its own backbenchers, the member for Thunder Bay-Atitokan, who wrote in The Chronicle Journal as recently as March 29 that the government was again going to meet with public service employee representatives on the issue of pension fund surpluses in order to come up with an agreement acceptable to both parties.

Hypothesis: They are trying to decide how to use surplusses

Mulai hari ini, kerajaan mesti mengikuti contoh yang ditunjukkan oleh salah seorang penyokongnya sendiri, ahli Thunder Bay-Atitokan, yang menulis dalam The Chronicle Journal baru-baru ini pada 29 Mac bahawa kerajaan sekali lagi akan bertemu dengan wakil kakitangan perkhidmatan awam pada isu lebihan dana pencen untuk menghasilkan perjanjian yang boleh diterima oleh kedua-dua pihak.

Mereka cuba memutuskan cara menggunakan lebihan


Premise: If he's trying to allege that I'm a hard-hearted person and I don't care about children, he's absolutely wrong. We've spent $4.7 billion a year in the State of Texas for uninsured people. And they get health care. Now, it's not the most efficient way to get people health care.

Hypothesis: The state of Texas spends about $90.385 million per week for uninsured people.

They spend $4.7 billion per year, divide that by 52 weeks and you get around $90.385 million per week. It's difficult because it's not written explicitly in the text and requires some calculation to figure out.

Jika dia cuba menuduh saya seorang yang keras hati dan saya tidak kisah dengan kanak-kanak, dia silap sama sekali. Kami telah membelanjakan $4.7 bilion setahun di Negeri Texas untuk orang yang tidak diinsuranskan. Dan mereka mendapat penjagaan kesihatan. Kini, ia bukan cara paling berkesan untuk mendapatkan penjagaan kesihatan orang ramai.

Negeri Texas membelanjakan kira-kira $90.385 juta setiap minggu untuk orang yang tidak diinsuranskan.


Premise: The other point I would like to raise with the parliamentary secretary is that with respect to this vaunted consultation and all this approval that farmers have for Bill C-4, I attended a Grain Days meeting, and I would inform him that people who attend Grain Days meetings are almost without exception strong supporters of the Canadian Wheat Board.

Hypothesis: The parliamentary secretary is a man

The person refers to the parliamentary secretary as "him"

Perkara lain yang saya ingin bangkitkan dengan setiausaha parlimen ialah berkenaan dengan perundingan yang dibanggakan ini dan semua kelulusan yang dimiliki oleh petani untuk Rang Undang-Undang C-4, saya telah menghadiri mesyuarat Grain Days, dan saya akan memaklumkan kepadanya bahawa orang yang menghadiri Grain. Pertemuan hari hampir tanpa pengecualian adalah penyokong kuat Lembaga Gandum Kanada.

Setiausaha parlimen adalah seorang lelaki


Premise: Increased liabilities will add a little to the cost of marine insurance but commercial vessels insured in mutual protection and indemnity associations will probably see no substantive increase in insurance rates because coverage already provided by mutual associations is unlimited.

Hypothesis: Increased liabilities are bad for the boater

They are bad because they increase rates, 'no substantive increase' is still an increase.

Peningkatan liabiliti akan menambah sedikit kos insurans marin tetapi kapal komersil yang diinsuranskan dalam persatuan perlindungan bersama dan indemniti mungkin tidak akan melihat peningkatan yang ketara dalam kadar insurans kerana perlindungan yang telah disediakan oleh persatuan bersama adalah tidak terhad.

Peningkatan liabiliti adalah tidak baik untuk bot


Premise: That, in the present sitting, proceedings pursuant to Standing Order 38 shall be taken up immediately following the completion of Private Members' Business and, when such proceedings are completed, the House shall proceed immediately to proceedings pursuant to Standing Order 52, provided that during the aforementioned proceedings the Chair shall not receive any quorum calls or dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent.

Hypothesis: Private Members' Business comes first.

It says will be addressed following completion of private members' business.

Bahawa, dalam persidangan ini, prosiding menurut Peraturan Tetap 38 hendaklah diambil dengan serta-merta selepas selesainya Urusan Persendirian dan, apabila prosiding itu selesai, Dewan hendaklah meneruskan prosiding dengan serta-merta menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat 52, dengan syarat bahawa semasa prosiding yang disebutkan di atas Pengerusi tidak akan menerima sebarang panggilan korum atau usul dilatory atau permintaan untuk persetujuan sebulat suara.

Perniagaan Ahli Persendirian diutamakan.


Premise: If I think it's in our nation's strategic interest I'll commit troops. I thought it was in our strategic interests to keep Milosevic in check because of our relations in NATO, and that's why I took the position I took. I think it's important for NATO to be strong and confident. I felt like unchecked Milosevic would harm NATO, and so it depends on the situation, Mr. Vice President.

Hypothesis: Milosevic is bad for Nato

Jika saya fikir ia adalah untuk kepentingan strategik negara kita, saya akan meletakkan tentera. Saya fikir ia adalah kepentingan strategik kami untuk memastikan Milosevic terkawal kerana hubungan kami dalam NATO, dan itulah sebabnya saya mengambil kedudukan yang saya ambil. Saya fikir penting untuk NATO menjadi kuat dan yakin. Saya rasa Milosevic yang tidak dikawal akan membahayakan NATO, jadi ia bergantung kepada keadaan, Encik Naib Presiden.


Premise: In describing these features of the statutory review scheme in some detail, I want to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme is to ensure that the people of Nunavut are not treated as second class citizens when it comes to the rights accorded to them by their court system.

Hypothesis: The speaker emphasizes only one purpose of the scheme.

"I want to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme ..." is the quote, so only one purpose is emphasized. "Only" fooled the model.

Dalam menghuraikan ciri-ciri skim semakan berkanun ini secara terperinci, saya ingin menekankan bahawa salah satu tujuan penting skim ini adalah untuk memastikan bahawa penduduk Nunavut tidak dianggap sebagai warganegara kelas kedua apabila ia berkaitan dengan hak yang diberikan kepada mereka. oleh sistem mahkamah mereka.

Penceramah hanya menekankan satu tujuan skim tersebut.


Premise: Essentially there were a lot of people in the community who were standing and speaking at this meeting because they wanted to warn the school board that they were not in favor of any legal action coming against the community, against the school board. They were afraid for their tax dollars.

Hypothesis: The school board listened to the people in the community warn them about legal action.

This is correct because a lot of people showed up at the meeting warning the school board that they didn't favor any legal action.

Pada asasnya terdapat ramai orang dalam komuniti yang berdiri dan bercakap pada mesyuarat ini kerana mereka ingin memberi amaran kepada lembaga sekolah bahawa mereka tidak memihak kepada sebarang tindakan undang-undang yang dikenakan terhadap masyarakat, terhadap lembaga sekolah. Mereka takut untuk dolar cukai mereka.

Lembaga sekolah mendengar orang ramai dalam masyarakat memberi amaran kepada mereka tentang tindakan undang-undang.


Premise: I want to make myself clear, we consider the role played by the Export Development Corporation both positive and vital, but we feel it must conduct itself as a crown corporation of a country that cannot blindly encourage and support exports and investments abroad without considering the effects of its action.

An acronym is formed from the first letter of each word, therefore it is definitely correct to say that The acronym for the Export Development Corporation is EDC.

Saya ingin menjelaskan kepada diri saya sendiri, kami menganggap peranan yang dimainkan oleh Perbadanan Pembangunan Eksport adalah positif dan penting, tetapi kami merasakan ia mesti berkelakuan sebagai perbadanan mahkota negara yang tidak boleh menggalakkan dan menyokong eksport dan pelaburan ke luar negara tanpa mengambil kira kesannya. daripada tindakannya.

Akronim untuk Export Development Corporation ialah EDC.


Premise: Well, it starts with enforcing law. When you say loud and clear to somebody if you're going to carry a gun illegally, we're going to arrest you. If you're going to sell a gun illegally, you need to be arrested. If you commit a crime with a gun, there needs to be absolute certainty in the law.

Hypothesis: Do not think about carrying a gun illegally, as you can get arrested.

You can get arrested for carrying a gun illegally, so the statement is definitely correct.

Baiklah, ia bermula dengan menguatkuasakan undang-undang. Apabila anda berkata dengan kuat dan jelas kepada seseorang jika anda akan membawa pistol secara haram, kami akan menangkap anda. Jika anda akan menjual pistol secara haram, anda perlu ditangkap. Jika anda melakukan jenayah dengan pistol, perlu ada kepastian mutlak dalam undang-undang.

Jangan berfikir tentang membawa pistol secara haram, kerana anda boleh ditangkap.