Premise: This looks artificial when you're dealing with a fact witness, but these are fact witnesses who are also reporters, and I am straining to try to find a fair way to do this. I believe that to the extent -- and I've said this now several times -- that the reporters' testimony is necessary in order to invoke the residual hearsay exception under Rule 807, that the defendants have to have an opportunity to examine the reporters on the same topics and subjects that I would allow the plaintiffs to question them on during their case-in-chief, nothing more and nothing less.

Hypothesis: the reporters testimony is important

Ini kelihatan tiruan apabila anda berurusan dengan saksi fakta, tetapi ini adalah saksi fakta yang juga pemberita, dan saya berusaha untuk mencari cara yang adil untuk melakukan perkara ini. Saya percaya bahawa setakat -- dan saya telah mengatakan ini sekarang beberapa kali -- bahawa keterangan wartawan adalah perlu untuk menggunakan pengecualian dengar khabar sisa di bawah Peraturan 807, bahawa defendan perlu mempunyai peluang untuk memeriksa wartawan mengenai topik dan subjek yang sama yang saya akan membenarkan plaintif menyoal mereka semasa ketua kes mereka, tidak lebih dan tidak kurang.


Premise: These two newspapers respectively go to approximately 89 municipal meetings in terms of different municipalities and school districts. And ironically -- in a sense, I have to commend both Mr. Maldonado and Ms. Bernard-Bubb because, again, they're paid per story. They get anywhere between $40 and $50 a story. They might make $300, $400 a week if they write X number of stories, and that's it. And the stories that they write predominantly are municipal stories.

Hypothesis: Mr. Maldonado and Ms. Bernard-Bubb go to the same municipal meetings.

Mr. Maldonado and Ms. Bernard-Bubb respectively go to about 89 meetings, but we don't know if they attend exactly the same meetings - the model assumes this, though.

Kedua-dua akhbar ini masing-masing pergi ke kira-kira 89 mesyuarat perbandaran dari segi majlis perbandaran dan daerah sekolah yang berbeza. Dan ironinya -- dalam erti kata lain, saya perlu memuji Encik Maldonado dan Cik Bernard-Bubb kerana, sekali lagi, mereka dibayar setiap cerita. Mereka mendapat mana-mana antara $40 dan $50 satu cerita. Mereka mungkin memperoleh $300, $400 seminggu jika mereka menulis X bilangan cerita, dan itu sahaja. Dan cerita yang mereka tulis kebanyakannya adalah cerita perbandaran.

Encik Maldonado dan Cik Bernard-Bubb pergi ke mesyuarat perbandaran yang sama.


Premise: That is, that the Copyright Clause justifies the extension for works not yet created, but it would be enormously inequitable to have other authors who put in the same amount of work get a lesser protection, so the Necessary and Proper Clause now allows you to do the 24 retrospective?

Hypothesis: The copyright clause protects all authors.

We don't know if it's all or none or how much based on the text

Iaitu, Klausa Hak Cipta mewajarkan pelanjutan untuk karya yang belum dibuat, tetapi adalah sangat tidak adil jika pengarang lain yang membuat jumlah kerja yang sama mendapat perlindungan yang lebih rendah, jadi Klausa Perlu dan Wajar kini membenarkan anda melakukannya retrospektif 24?

Klausa hak cipta melindungi semua pengarang.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I am rising today to speak to Bill C-54, the personal information protection and electronic documents act the purpose of which is to promote electronic commerce by providing Canadians with a right to privacy of personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in an increasingly information based economy and world.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a man

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya bangun hari ini untuk bercakap dengan Rang Undang-Undang C-54, perlindungan maklumat peribadi dan dokumen elektronik bertindak yang tujuannya adalah untuk mempromosikan perdagangan elektronik dengan memberikan hak kepada warga Kanada untuk privasi maklumat peribadi yang dikumpul, digunakan atau didedahkan dalam ekonomi dan dunia yang semakin berasaskan maklumat.


Premise: And we will return next Tuesday night, October 17th, from Washington University in St. Louis for the third and final debate. Thank you, Vice President Gore, Governor Bush. See you next week. For now, from Winston-Salem, I'm Jim Lehrer, thank you and good night.

Hypothesis: The third and final debate between Vice President Gore and Governor Bush is scheduled for October 17th, which is 7 days from the current event.

Even though the host stated he would see the candidates next week, it is not certain that the debate will be in 7 days.  Next week is any day of the week after the weekend.

Dan kami akan kembali pada malam Selasa depan, 17 Oktober, dari Universiti Washington di St. Louis untuk perbahasan ketiga dan terakhir. Terima kasih, Naib Presiden Gore, Gabenor Bush. Jumpa minggu depan. Buat masa ini, dari Winston-Salem, saya Jim Lehrer, terima kasih dan selamat malam.

Debat ketiga dan terakhir antara Naib Presiden Gore dan Gabenor Bush dijadualkan pada 17 Oktober, iaitu 7 hari dari acara semasa.


Premise: I think we need to have clean coal technologies. I propose $2 billion worth. By the way, I just found out the other day an interesting fact, that there is a national petroleum reserve right next to -- in Prudhoe Bay that your administration opened up for exploration in that pristine area.

Hypothesis: Prudhoe Bay will be destroyed in 2020

We have no idea what will happen to Prudhoe Bay. 2020 is in the future, anything could happen

Saya fikir kita perlu mempunyai teknologi arang batu yang bersih. Saya mencadangkan nilai $2 bilion. Ngomong-ngomong, saya baru mengetahui satu hari yang lalu fakta yang menarik, bahawa terdapat rizab petroleum negara betul-betul bersebelahan -- di Teluk Prudhoe yang dibuka oleh pentadbiran anda untuk penerokaan di kawasan murni itu.


Premise: It's important to be friends with people when you don't need each other so that when you do there's a strong bond of friendship. And that's going to be particularly important in dealing not only with situations such as now occurring in Israel, but with Saddam Hussein.

Hypothesis: You should be friends with every person.

This isn't directly supported by the text. It just states that it's important to be friends with even people you don't need

Adalah penting untuk berkawan dengan orang apabila anda tidak memerlukan satu sama lain supaya apabila anda melakukannya terdapat ikatan persahabatan yang kuat. Dan itu akan menjadi sangat penting dalam menangani bukan sahaja situasi seperti yang berlaku sekarang di Israel, tetapi dengan Saddam Hussein.

Anda harus berkawan dengan setiap orang.


Premise: And it's important, Jim, not only -- not just because of Texas, but because this mirrors the national controversy. There is pending now in the Congress a national hate crimes law because of James Byrd, because of Matthew Shepard, who was crucified on a split rail fence by bigots, and because of others.

Hypothesis: Matthew Shepard is named in the hate crimes bill.

We do not know if he is named in the bill or not.

Dan ini penting, Jim, bukan sahaja -- bukan hanya kerana Texas, tetapi kerana ini mencerminkan kontroversi negara. Terdapat undang-undang jenayah kebencian kebangsaan yang belum selesai sekarang kerana James Byrd, kerana Matthew Shepard, yang telah disalibkan di atas pagar kereta api yang terbelah oleh orang fanatik, dan kerana orang lain.

Matthew Shepard dinamakan dalam rang undang-undang jenayah benci.


Premise: Thanks to the safety net programs that we have in place, the cattle industry is prospering, supply management sectors are sound and, in spite of price instability, our hog sector continues to claim an ever increasing share of North American production, laying the groundwork for the future.

Hypothesis: in the cattle/hog industry, something always stinks

cows and hogs do smell, the model has difficulties with ambiguous statements

Terima kasih kepada program jaringan keselamatan yang kami sediakan, industri lembu berkembang maju, sektor pengurusan bekalan adalah kukuh dan, walaupun harga tidak stabil, sektor babi kami terus menuntut bahagian pengeluaran Amerika Utara yang semakin meningkat, meletakkan asas untuk masa depan.

dalam industri lembu/khinzir, sesuatu selalu berbau busuk


Premise: Actually, I made my intentions -- made my views clear. I did think we ought to extend the assault weapons ban, and was told the fact that the bill was never going to move, because Republicans and Democrats were against the assault weapon ban, people of both parties. I believe law-abiding citizens ought to be able to own a gun. I believe in background checks at gun shows or anywhere to make sure that guns don't get in the hands of people that shouldn't have them.

Hypothesis: Background checks at gun shows are not viable

The text does not talk about application. This idea was probably too complex for the system

Sebenarnya, saya telah menyatakan niat saya -- menjelaskan pandangan saya. Saya fikir kita patut melanjutkan larangan senjata serangan, dan diberitahu fakta bahawa rang undang-undang itu tidak akan bergerak, kerana Republikan dan Demokrat menentang larangan senjata serangan, orang kedua-dua pihak. Saya percaya rakyat yang mematuhi undang-undang sepatutnya boleh memiliki senjata api. Saya percaya pada pemeriksaan latar belakang di pertunjukan senjata api atau di mana-mana sahaja untuk memastikan senjata tidak sampai ke tangan orang yang tidak sepatutnya memilikinya.

Pemeriksaan latar belakang pada pertunjukan senjata tidak berdaya maju


Premise: But Columbine spoke to a larger issue. It's really a matter of culture. It's a culture that somewhere along the line we've begun to disrespect life. Where a child can walk in and have their heart turned dark as a result of being on the Internet and walk in and decide to take somebody else's life?

Hypothesis: Columbine is a person.

Columbine is assumed to be a place of a horrible shooting however without any pronouns it cant be ruled out to be a person named columbine talking.

Tetapi Columbine bercakap dengan isu yang lebih besar. Ia benar-benar soal budaya. Ia adalah satu budaya yang di suatu tempat di sepanjang garis kita telah mula tidak menghormati kehidupan. Di mana seorang kanak-kanak boleh masuk dan hati mereka menjadi gelap akibat berada di Internet dan berjalan masuk dan memutuskan untuk mengambil nyawa orang lain?


Premise: This is a shameful process that allows those among us who are more fortunate to literally laugh at low wage earners, at the people who dutifully pay their taxes, because of all sorts of manoeuvres that the auditor general has condemned here in Canada, even if attempts were made to prevent him from speaking out in the finance committee, as I saw with my own eyes.

Hypothesis: Everyone pays their taxes.

I wrote that everyone pays their taxes, which is not stated one way or another in the text so it's correctness cannot be proved from the text.

Ini adalah proses yang memalukan yang membolehkan mereka yang lebih bernasib baik di kalangan kita untuk benar-benar mentertawakan mereka yang berpendapatan rendah, kepada orang yang patuh membayar cukai mereka, kerana pelbagai cara yang telah dikecam oleh ketua juruaudit di Kanada, walaupun cubaan telah dibuat untuk menghalangnya daripada bersuara dalam jawatankuasa kewangan, seperti yang saya lihat dengan mata kepala saya sendiri.


Premise: Well, I understand, and Africa is important. And we've got to do a lot of work in Africa to promote democracy and trade, and there are some -- Vice President mentioned Nigeria is a fledgling democracy. We have to work with Nigeria. That's an important continent.

Hypothesis: Promoting democracy in Africa will be easy.

There's no difficult attached to the given context, and it may or may not be easy to promote democracy in Africa.

Saya faham, dan Afrika adalah penting. Dan kita perlu melakukan banyak kerja di Afrika untuk mempromosikan demokrasi dan perdagangan, dan terdapat beberapa -- Naib Presiden menyebut Nigeria adalah demokrasi yang masih baru. Kami perlu bekerjasama dengan Nigeria. Itu benua yang penting.

Mempromosikan demokrasi di Afrika akan menjadi mudah.


Premise: It may come as a shock for somebody who has been in Washington for so long. But actually limited government can work in the second largest state in the union. And therefore Congress passes the bill after our session in 1997 ended, we passed an enabling legislation in 1999.

Hypothesis: Actually limited government does work in the second largest state in the union.

The writer says "actually limited government CAN [not does] work in the second largest state in the union. Changing that small word fooled the model but changes the meaning.

Ia mungkin mengejutkan seseorang yang telah berada di Washington untuk sekian lama. Tetapi sebenarnya kerajaan terhad boleh bekerja di negeri kedua terbesar dalam kesatuan itu. Oleh itu Kongres meluluskan rang undang-undang itu selepas sesi kami pada tahun 1997 berakhir, kami meluluskan undang-undang yang membolehkan pada tahun 1999.

Kerajaan terhad sebenarnya bekerja di negeri kedua terbesar dalam kesatuan itu.


Premise: We have a copyright term that's consistent with the concept of the creator plus the creator's first generation heirs. We have a copyright term, remember, which supersedes the earlier copyright provisions that were added to the period between creation and publication, so that the limited number of years in the first, the 1790 and the 1831 statute were the number of years plus the relatively unlimited period of time between creation and publication, so we don't have anything remotely like that in this situation.

Hypothesis: Copyright terms are considered null and void if it is found that the creator never filed to include their heirs.

Copyright laws can take into consideration a creator's first generation heirs, but it is not said if that is automatic or if the creator had to request it.

Kami mempunyai istilah hak cipta yang konsisten dengan konsep pencipta serta pewaris generasi pertama pencipta. Kami mempunyai istilah hak cipta, ingat, yang menggantikan peruntukan hak cipta terdahulu yang telah ditambahkan pada tempoh antara penciptaan dan penerbitan, supaya bilangan tahun yang terhad pada tahun pertama, statut 1790 dan 1831 ialah bilangan tahun ditambah dengan relatifnya. tempoh masa yang tidak terhad antara penciptaan dan penerbitan, jadi kami tidak mempunyai apa-apa dari jauh seperti itu dalam situasi ini.

Istilah hak cipta dianggap batal dan tidak sah jika didapati bahawa Pencipta tidak pernah difailkan untuk memasukkan pewaris mereka.


Premise: There's been too much finger pointing and too much name calling in Washington, D.C. I would like to unite this country to get an agenda done that will speak to the hopes and aspirations of the future. I want to have an education system that sets high standards, local control of schools and strong accountability.

Hypothesis: Finger pointing is popular in alabama.

Terlalu banyak menuding jari dan terlalu banyak menyebut nama di Washington, D.C. Saya ingin menyatukan negara ini untuk menyelesaikan agenda yang akan bercakap dengan harapan dan aspirasi masa depan. Saya mahu mempunyai sistem pendidikan yang menetapkan standard yang tinggi, kawalan tempatan terhadap sekolah dan akauntabiliti yang kukuh.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I was pointing out that today, as we are debating the estimates, when we think the most important issue facing parliament is the spending of the public purse, the approving of taxation and the spending of $145 billion of taxpayer money, we would take that very seriously in our debates in the House of Commons.

Hypothesis: Money is all that matters in the House of Commons

It does not state whether money is the only thing that matters or not

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya menegaskan bahawa hari ini, semasa kita membahaskan anggaran, apabila kita fikir isu paling penting yang dihadapi parlimen ialah perbelanjaan wang awam, kelulusan cukai dan perbelanjaan wang pembayar cukai $145 bilion, kita akan mengambil serius perkara itu dalam perbahasan kami di Dewan Rakyat.

Wang adalah semua yang penting dalam Dewan Rakyat


Premise: Thereafter, in 1831, 1909, 1976, and 1998, and in numerous private copyright bills and temporary extensions of the copyright law and in repeated patent law revisions, Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright and patent protection of subsisting works.

Hypothesis: Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright in a private copyright bill in 2003

It is neither because the dates of the copyright bills are not given. it says they extended it in those four years AND copyright bills, meaning they were not necessarily in those years. The system thinks the only extension could happen is during the 4 years mentioned

Selepas itu, pada tahun 1831, 1909, 1976, dan 1998, dan dalam banyak rang undang-undang hak cipta persendirian dan lanjutan sementara undang-undang hak cipta dan dalam semakan undang-undang paten berulang, Kongres melanjutkan syarat hak cipta Persekutuan dan perlindungan paten bagi karya yang masih ada.

Kongres melanjutkan syarat hak cipta Persekutuan dalam rang undang-undang hak cipta persendirian pada tahun 2003


Premise: As the C.D. Howe Institute notes, the tendency to employ this kind of one-time initiative to lower the reported surplus has the effect of biasing initiatives against tax cuts and into program spending and, in particular, into program spending of the type that can be delivered through some sort of foundation or fund.

Hypothesis: The C. D. Howe Institute had not been created yet in 1964.

Nothing in the text establishes when the organization was created, so we don't know for sure. It's difficult because the system has a lot of trouble with statements that talk about existence in a general sense.

Sebagai C.D. Howe Institute mencatat, kecenderungan untuk menggunakan inisiatif sekali ini untuk mengurangkan lebihan yang dilaporkan mempunyai kesan inisiatif berat sebelah terhadap pemotongan cukai dan ke dalam perbelanjaan program dan, khususnya, ke dalam perbelanjaan program jenis yang boleh disampaikan melalui beberapa macam yayasan atau dana.

Institut C. D. Howe belum lagi diwujudkan pada tahun 1964.


Premise: Our rate of uninsured, the percentage of uninsured in Texas has gone down, while the percentage of uninsured in America has gone up. Our CHIPS program got a late start because our government meets only four months out of every two years, Mr. Vice President.

Hypothesis: The writer of this passage is president Barack Obama.

The text does not talk about who is doing the actions or making these claims. The system is probably looking for closure and certainty.

Kadar kami yang tidak diinsuranskan, peratusan yang tidak diinsuranskan di Texas telah menurun, manakala peratusan yang tidak diinsuranskan di Amerika telah meningkat. Program CHIPS kami lambat dimulakan kerana kerajaan kami hanya bertemu empat bulan daripada setiap dua tahun, Tuan Naib Presiden.

Penulis petikan ini ialah presiden Barack Obama.


Premise: It used to be a weekly occurrence. It's now a daily occurrence, and my daughter comes home from school upset about these comments that are being made to her and, you know, is looking for guidance on how to respond to these questions. Also, intelligent design is not a scientific concept.

Hypothesis: The daughter was not initially but is now upset by the comments.

It only discusses her current, not past, state of being upset.

Ia pernah menjadi kejadian mingguan. Ia kini menjadi kejadian harian, dan anak perempuan saya pulang dari sekolah kecewa dengan komen yang dibuat kepadanya dan, anda tahu, sedang mencari panduan tentang cara menjawab soalan ini. Juga, reka bentuk pintar bukanlah konsep saintifik.

Anak perempuan itu pada mulanya tidak tetapi kini kecewa dengan komen tersebut.


Premise: Given the serious nature of the situation, ought not the government immediately mandate the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development to carry out a thorough investigation on the scandal of quotas and harassment of which both the unemployed and the employees of Human Resources Development Canada are victims?

Hypothesis: Unemployed people in Canada like being unemployed and do not see themselves as victims.

I think my statement could be true, or not be true..There is really no way to determine if it is true or not within the given context.

Memandangkan keadaan yang serius, tidakkah kerajaan perlu segera memberi mandat kepada Jawatankuasa Tetap Pembangunan Sumber Manusia untuk menjalankan siasatan menyeluruh mengenai skandal kuota dan gangguan yang mana penganggur dan pekerja Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Kanada menjadi mangsa?

Orang yang menganggur di Kanada suka menganggur dan tidak melihat diri mereka sebagai mangsa.


Premise: However many days that young girl in Florida stood in her classroom, however long, even if it was only one day, doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of overcrowded classrooms in America and we need to do something about that. There are seniors who pay more for their prescriptions than a lot of other people, more than their pets, sometimes.

Hypothesis: Seniors sometimes pay more for their prescriptions than young girls who have to stand in classrooms.

The text says there are seniors who pay more for their prescriptions than a lot of other people, more than their pets, sometimes. The text also talks about a young girl having to stand in a classroom. But, it doesn't connect these unrelated facts, which the model mistakenly does.

Walau bagaimana pun beberapa hari gadis muda di Florida itu berdiri di dalam bilik darjahnya, walau bagaimanapun lamanya, walaupun hanya satu hari, tidak mengubah hakikat bahawa terdapat banyak bilik darjah yang sesak di Amerika dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu untuk itu. Terdapat warga emas yang membayar lebih untuk preskripsi mereka daripada ramai orang lain, lebih daripada haiwan peliharaan mereka, kadangkala.

Warga emas kadangkala membayar lebih untuk preskripsi mereka berbanding gadis muda yang terpaksa berdiri di dalam bilik darjah.


Premise: I've developed -- put out money in my budget to expand community health centers all around the country. These are places where people can get primary care. Secondly -- and they're good. They're very important parts of the safety net of health care. Secondly, that you get a $2,000 rebate from the government if you're a family of $30,000 or less -- it scales down as you get higher -- that you can use to purchase health care in the private markets.

Hypothesis: More community health centers will provide best quality primary care services after this budget and the families with income less than $30,000 will save more, as the government will give $2000 rebate.

Community health center may increase after this budget but the best quality of the service is not guaranteed and also low income families do not necessarily save more even after the rebate.

Saya telah membangunkan -- mengeluarkan wang dalam bajet saya untuk mengembangkan pusat kesihatan masyarakat di seluruh negara. Ini adalah tempat di mana orang ramai boleh mendapatkan penjagaan primer. Kedua -- dan mereka bagus. Ia adalah bahagian yang sangat penting dalam jaringan keselamatan penjagaan kesihatan. Kedua, anda mendapat rebat $2,000 daripada kerajaan jika anda sekeluarga $30,000 atau kurang -- ia berkurangan apabila anda semakin tinggi -- yang boleh anda gunakan untuk membeli penjagaan kesihatan di pasaran swasta.

Lebih banyak pusat kesihatan komuniti akan menyediakan perkhidmatan penjagaan primer berkualiti terbaik selepas belanjawan ini dan keluarga yang berpendapatan kurang daripada $30,000 akan menjimatkan lebih banyak, kerana kerajaan akan memberikan rebat $2000.


Premise: In the PC plan for growth we call for government to allow Canadians to have more flexibility with their RESP contributions and transfers from their RRSPs, but only as part of a holistic policy toward economic growth, one that combines tax relief, lower income taxes, lower payroll taxes, greater opportunities for jobs and growth in Canada that would keep young people here where they belong.

Hypothesis: Without the PC plan for growth in Canada, Canada will not keep young people here.

We can only speculate about the outcome of the failure to enact this plan, which the system did not recognize.

Dalam rancangan PC untuk pertumbuhan, kami menyeru kerajaan membenarkan rakyat Kanada mempunyai lebih fleksibiliti dengan sumbangan RESP dan pemindahan mereka daripada RRSP mereka, tetapi hanya sebagai sebahagian daripada dasar holistik ke arah pertumbuhan ekonomi, yang menggabungkan pelepasan cukai, cukai pendapatan yang lebih rendah, lebih rendah. cukai gaji, peluang yang lebih besar untuk pekerjaan dan pertumbuhan di Kanada yang akan mengekalkan golongan muda di sini di mana mereka berada.

Tanpa pelan PC untuk pertumbuhan di Kanada, Kanada tidak akan mengekalkan golongan muda di sini.


Premise: One percent of America got $89 billion last year in a tax cut, but people working hard, playing by the rules, trying to take care of their kids, family values, that we're supposed to value so much in America -- I'm tired of politicians who talk about family values and don't value families.

Hypothesis: Hard working families didn't get tax cuts

The context doesn't say who actually got the tax cuts, just that it was 1% of America. Its likely that some hard working families were in that 1%, but there's no way to be sure for definite. The system could likely not make this leap in logic.

Satu peratus daripada Amerika mendapat $89 bilion tahun lepas dalam pemotongan cukai, tetapi orang bekerja keras, bermain mengikut peraturan, cuba menjaga anak-anak mereka, nilai keluarga, yang kita sepatutnya menghargai begitu banyak di Amerika -- saya' Saya bosan dengan ahli politik yang bercakap tentang nilai kekeluargaan dan tidak menghargai keluarga.

Keluarga yang bekerja keras tidak mendapat potongan cukai


Premise: What I was really making reference to was when a physician perhaps in Quebec or a physician in the maritimes or a physician out west may make an advance or a discovery in terms of service delivery, there is no system in place right now throughout the country where there is an exchange of this type of information.

Hypothesis: No one knows what the speaker was talking about.

We don't know whether the audience understood what he was talking about so it is neither correct nor incorrect.

Apa yang saya benar-benar rujuk adalah apabila seorang doktor mungkin di Quebec atau doktor di maritim atau doktor di luar barat boleh membuat kemajuan atau penemuan dari segi penyampaian perkhidmatan, tidak ada sistem yang disediakan sekarang di seluruh negara di mana terdapat pertukaran maklumat jenis ini.

Tiada siapa yang tahu apa yang diperkatakan oleh penceramah itu.


Premise: I would like to, of course, and I presume this administration would as well. We don't know -- there are no inspectors now in Iraq, the coalition that was in place isn't as strong as it used to be. He is a danger. We don't want him fishing in troubled waters in the Middle East. And it's going to be hard, it's going to be important to rebuild that coalition to keep the pressure on him.

Hypothesis: There were inspectors in Iraq.

The text says 'there are no inspectors NOW in Iraq." There could have been in the past.

Saya ingin, sudah tentu, dan saya menganggap pentadbiran ini juga. Kita tidak tahu -- tiada pemeriksa sekarang di Iraq, pakatan yang ada tidak sekuat dulu. Dia bahaya. Kami tidak mahu dia memancing di perairan bergolak di Timur Tengah. Dan ia akan menjadi sukar, ia akan menjadi penting untuk membina semula gabungan itu untuk mengekalkan tekanan ke atasnya.


Premise: In lending support to what the previous speaker from Peterborough said to a grassroots movement, we are recognizing that the insanity of land mines and the insanity of war that maims hundreds of thousands, indeed millions of people, is something that we must stop and work against.

Hypothesis: People from Peterborough speak out against cruise missiles.

Just because they speak out against land mines doesn't mean they will do the same with cruise missiles. However, it does not mean they never will, especially if they agree with "the insanity of war" statement.

Dalam memberikan sokongan kepada apa yang dikatakan oleh penceramah terdahulu dari Peterborough kepada gerakan akar umbi, kami menyedari bahawa kegilaan periuk api darat dan kegilaan perang yang melukai ratusan ribu, malah berjuta-juta orang, adalah sesuatu yang harus kita hentikan dan usahakan untuk menentangnya. .

Orang dari Peterborough bersuara menentang peluru berpandu jelajah.


Premise: I have, I have. First question is what's in the best interests of the United States? What's in the best interests of our people? When it comes to foreign policy that will be my guiding question. Is it in our nation's interests? Peace in the Middle East is in our nation's interests.

Hypothesis: The Middle East is currently not at peace.

The context does not state whether or not there is peace in the Middle East currently.

Saya ada, saya ada. Soalan pertama ialah apakah kepentingan terbaik Amerika Syarikat? Apakah yang terbaik untuk kepentingan rakyat kita? Apabila ia datang kepada dasar luar itu akan menjadi soalan panduan saya. Adakah demi kepentingan negara kita? Keamanan di Timur Tengah adalah untuk kepentingan negara kita.


Premise: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-67 with no resistance at this time because we believe that the bill is offering advantages to Canadians, we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur.

Hypothesis: The topic of Bill C-68 is arms control

There is no way to know what the topic of bill C-68 is.  It could be arms control, it could be anything else.  There is no way to know.

Kesimpulannya, sementara kami di sebelah Dewan ini menyokong RUU C-67 tanpa tentangan pada masa ini kerana kami percaya bahawa rang undang-undang itu menawarkan kelebihan kepada rakyat Kanada, kami harus mengambil kesempatan untuk memarahi kerajaan kerana kakinya mengheret dalam melaksanakan. perubahan selanjutnya kepada industri perkhidmatan kewangan yang perlu berlaku.

Topik Rang Undang-Undang C-68 ialah kawalan senjata


Premise: That's fine. And I note that, and that's why I wanted to do this on the record. And I understand that you object to that, and I understand the defendants have interposed not only this objection but they have also argued against that. And to the extent that this really clarifies and reasserts what I have in my prior orders, I think you've preserved your position as it relates to that, and I understand that position.

Hypothesis: Staying off the record is not a hard decision to make.

There is no way to tell if testifying on record is easy or a hard decision to make.

tak apa. Dan saya perhatikan itu, dan itulah sebabnya saya mahu melakukan ini dalam rekod. Dan saya faham bahawa anda membantah itu, dan saya faham defendan telah mencelah bukan sahaja bantahan ini tetapi mereka juga berhujah terhadapnya. Dan setakat ini benar-benar menjelaskan dan menegaskan semula apa yang saya ada dalam pesanan saya sebelum ini, saya fikir anda telah mengekalkan kedudukan anda kerana ia berkaitan dengan itu, dan saya faham kedudukan itu.

Mengekalkan rekod bukanlah keputusan yang sukar untuk dibuat.


Premise: When he approached Mr. Landry, did the Prime Minister tell him that this intervention in the field of education was raising hackles in Quebec and that everyone involved-students, the academic community and federalists and sovereignists alike-strongly opposed the federal government's intrusion into an area of provincial jurisdiction?

Hypothesis: The prime minister had not shorts.

The prime minister will call for war in a month.

Apabila dia mendekati Encik Landry, adakah Perdana Menteri memberitahunya bahawa campur tangan dalam bidang pendidikan ini menimbulkan masalah di Quebec dan bahawa semua orang yang terlibat-pelajar, komuniti akademik dan federalis dan negara berdaulat sama-sama kuat menentang pencerobohan kerajaan persekutuan ke dalam kawasan bidang kuasa wilayah?


Premise: In part that can explain the reason why, although we have implemented free trade agreements, they have not been as good as they can become because the Government of Canada has actually impeded and impaired the ability of the Canadian private sector to be competitive with its counterpart south of the border because it has not done much with removing the interprovincial trade barriers that hamstring them so badly.

Hypothesis: No free trade agreements with Canada were signed within the last decade.

The article mentions nothing about when Canada's free trade agreements were signed.  Thus, my statement about none being signed in the last decade is neither correct nor incorrect--it's just not known based on the article.  The system probably doesn't understand that agreements are signed, and then are in place.  So even though existing free trade agreements exist, it doesn't mean they were necessarily signed recently.

Sebahagian yang boleh menjelaskan sebab mengapa, walaupun kami telah melaksanakan perjanjian perdagangan bebas, ia tidak sebaik yang mungkin kerana Kerajaan Kanada sebenarnya telah menghalang dan menjejaskan keupayaan sektor swasta Kanada untuk berdaya saing dengan rakan sejawatannya. selatan sempadan kerana ia tidak berbuat banyak dengan menghapuskan halangan perdagangan antara wilayah yang menyebabkan mereka terhamstring dengan teruk.

Tiada perjanjian perdagangan bebas dengan Kanada ditandatangani dalam dekad yang lalu.


Premise: You have, as you have proposed and as the president has commented on tonight, proposed a massive plan to extend health-care coverage to children. You're also talking about the government picking up a big part of the catastrophic bills that people get at the hospital.

Hypothesis: health-care coverage is used by earl

Anda telah, seperti yang anda cadangkan dan seperti yang telah diulas oleh presiden malam ini, mencadangkan rancangan besar-besaran untuk memperluaskan perlindungan penjagaan kesihatan kepada kanak-kanak. Anda juga bercakap tentang kerajaan mengambil sebahagian besar daripada bil bencana yang orang ramai dapat di hospital.

perlindungan penjagaan kesihatan digunakan oleh ear


Premise: I think we ought to restore the three-day waiting period under the Brady Law. I think we should toughen the enforcement of gun laws so that the ones that are already on the books can be enforced much more effectively. Some of the restrictions that have been placed by the Congress in the last couple of years.

Hypothesis: Currently there is a one day waiting period

The context says it thinks the 3 day period needs to be restored, but says nothing about what the current requirement is, so it is neither correct nor incorrect to say there is a 1 day waiting period currently.

Saya rasa kita patut memulihkan tempoh menunggu selama tiga hari di bawah Undang-undang Brady. Saya fikir kita harus memperketatkan penguatkuasaan undang-undang senjata supaya undang-undang yang sudah ada dalam buku boleh dikuatkuasakan dengan lebih berkesan. Beberapa sekatan yang telah diletakkan oleh Kongres dalam beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini.

Pada masa ini terdapat tempoh menunggu satu hari


Premise: Mr. Speaker, will the minister admit that he should support the shipbuilding industry in Quebec and Canada by taking the same kind of measures the U.S. government has in place for its industry, so that our builders can at least compete on a level playing field with the Americans?

Hypothesis: the minister supports the shipbuilding industry of the united states

the agent asks if the minister supports the shipbuilding industry in the united states, it is never stated that he actually supports it or does not support it.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, adakah menteri akan mengakui bahawa beliau harus menyokong industri pembinaan kapal di Quebec dan Kanada dengan mengambil langkah-langkah yang sama yang kerajaan A.S. telah sediakan untuk industrinya, supaya pembina kita sekurang-kurangnya dapat bersaing di peringkat yang sama dengan orang Amerika?

menteri menyokong industri pembinaan kapal amerika syarikat


Premise: That has the benefit of making sure our employers aren't breaking the law as they try to fill their workforce needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. See, the card, it'll have a period of time attached to it.

Hypothesis: The card is a good idea for these people.

The card has benefits and the one speaking is trying hard to sell it as a good thing but we definitely have too little information about what the card really is to even decide if it's good or bad.

Itu mempunyai faedah untuk memastikan majikan kita tidak melanggar undang-undang semasa mereka cuba memenuhi keperluan tenaga kerja mereka. Ia memastikan bahawa orang yang melintasi sempadan dilayan secara berperikemanusiaan, bahawa mereka tidak disimpan dalam bayang-bayang masyarakat kita, bahawa mereka dapat berulang-alik untuk melihat keluarga mereka. Lihat, kad itu, ia akan mempunyai tempoh masa yang dilampirkan padanya.

Kad itu adalah idea yang baik untuk orang ini.


Premise: I want to acknowledge the work of the Canadian Institute of Child Health, the Learning Disabilities Association of Canada, Greenpeace, the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, the Canadian Association of Family Resource Programs and the Canadian Child Care Federation.

Hypothesis: The Canadian Institute of Child Health and Canadian Child Care Federation worked together, and the speaker acknowledged it.

There is no indication that these two organizations worked together.

Saya ingin mengiktiraf hasil kerja Institut Kesihatan Kanak-Kanak Kanada, Persatuan Kurang Upaya Pembelajaran Kanada, Greenpeace, Persatuan Pakar Perubatan Kanada untuk Alam Sekitar, Persatuan Program Sumber Keluarga Kanada dan Persekutuan Penjagaan Kanak-Kanak Kanada.

Institut Kesihatan Kanak-Kanak Kanada dan Persekutuan Penjagaan Kanak-Kanak Kanada bekerjasama, dan penceramah mengakuinya.


Premise: And yes, I think it's something that people need to consider. This isn't something new. I read a report, or a memo, from somebody in his 1988 campaign -- I forgot the fellow's name -- warning then Senator Gore to be careful about exaggerating claims. I thought during his debate with Senator Bradley saying he authored the EITC when it didn't happen.

Hypothesis: Senator Gore won with debate to President Bush.

the statement was nowhere in the passage so it is neither. Can't figure out why the AI thought is was incorrect.

Dan ya, saya fikir ia adalah sesuatu yang perlu dipertimbangkan oleh orang ramai. Ini bukan sesuatu yang baru. Saya membaca laporan, atau memo, daripada seseorang dalam kempennya pada tahun 1988 -- saya terlupa nama rakan itu -- memberi amaran kepada Senator Gore ketika itu supaya berhati-hati tentang memperbesar-besarkan dakwaan. Saya fikir semasa perbahasannya dengan Senator Bradley mengatakan dia mengarang EITC apabila ia tidak berlaku.

Senator Gore menang dengan debat kepada Presiden Bush.


Premise: For the benefit of those members who were not with us in the last parliament and to refresh the memories of those who were, I would like to take a few minutes in the short time I have left before question period to review the history of the bill and the development of the government marine policy.

Hypothesis: Parliament will not pass this bill

The system says incorrect but we don't know if they will or not. I'm surprised the system had trouble with this i don't know what caused it

Untuk manfaat ahli-ahli yang tidak bersama kami dalam parlimen yang lalu dan untuk menyegarkan ingatan mereka yang pernah, saya ingin mengambil beberapa minit dalam masa singkat yang saya tinggalkan sebelum tempoh soalan untuk menyemak sejarah rang undang-undang. dan pembangunan dasar marin kerajaan.

Parlimen tidak akan meluluskan rang undang-undang ini


Premise: Whereas the Government of Canada seeks to achieve sustainable development that is based on an ecologically efficient use of natural, social and economic resources and acknowledges the need to integrate environmental, economic and social factors in the making of all decisions by government and private entities;

Hypothesis: The citizens of canada do not want sustainable resources developed

This is about the government of Canada making this choice not the citizens.

Manakala Kerajaan Kanada berusaha untuk mencapai pembangunan mampan yang berasaskan penggunaan sumber semula jadi, sosial dan ekonomi yang cekap dari segi ekologi dan mengakui keperluan untuk mengintegrasikan faktor alam sekitar, ekonomi dan sosial dalam membuat semua keputusan oleh entiti kerajaan dan swasta;

Rakyat Kanada tidak mahu sumber yang mampan dibangunkan


Premise: While these concerns were there and expressed in great detail, there was also great anticipation by people looking for the new opportunities that were to be gained from this piece of legislation, basically for their freedom from the red tape from Ottawa which they have been wrapped up in for so long.

Hypothesis: Ottawa is a centre of worship for the Dark Lord Sauron.

We do not know from the context whether or not Ottawa is a centre of worship for the Dark Lord Sauron, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Walaupun kebimbangan ini ada dan dinyatakan secara terperinci, terdapat juga penantian besar oleh orang yang mencari peluang baru yang akan diperolehi daripada sekeping perundangan ini, pada asasnya untuk kebebasan mereka daripada birokrasi Ottawa yang telah mereka selesaikan. dalam sekian lama.

"imunisasi" mempunyai kurang daripada tiga ratus huruf.


Premise: Mr. Lessig, the clause says, Congress shall, and suppose Congress decides in this expanded world of ours that it's going to make certain changes and other changes from our treaty partners. Suppose it well, the Germans led the fight for 70 years in the European Union, we'll go with that, but we're going demand says,fair use. Now, why couldn't that fit within the promotion of knowledge?

Hypothesis: The Germans are happy with the current treaty.

We do not know whether or not the Germans are happy with the current treaty, so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Encik Lessig, klausa itu mengatakan, Kongres hendaklah, dan andaikan Kongres memutuskan dalam dunia kita yang semakin berkembang ini bahawa ia akan membuat perubahan tertentu dan perubahan lain daripada rakan kongsi perjanjian kita. Katakan dengan baik, Jerman mengetuai perjuangan selama 70 tahun di Kesatuan Eropah, kami akan meneruskannya, tetapi kami akan mengikut permintaan, kata penggunaan adil. Sekarang, mengapa itu tidak sesuai dengan promosi pengetahuan?

Jerman gembira dengan perjanjian semasa.


Premise: As a result of that, Mr. Barna and I have spent days in an effort to try to see if there was a means by which we could somehow ameliorate the problem so that, in a certain sense, everybody gets what they want. I clearly will not get what I want, because at the end of the day, if I agree that my reporters are going to testify predicated upon something that I want to propose here, that's more than I would want, because I stand by the fact and they stand by the fact that there's a reporter's privilege here.

Hypothesis: Statement is from a movie character.

Have no idea if this statement is from real life or fiction. It could very well be either.

Hasil daripada itu, Encik Barna dan saya telah menghabiskan masa berhari-hari dalam usaha untuk melihat sama ada ada cara yang boleh kami perbaiki masalah itu supaya, dalam erti kata tertentu, semua orang mendapat apa yang mereka inginkan. Saya jelas tidak akan mendapat apa yang saya mahu, kerana pada penghujung hari, jika saya bersetuju bahawa wartawan saya akan memberi keterangan berdasarkan sesuatu yang saya ingin usulkan di sini, itu lebih daripada yang saya mahukan, kerana saya berpegang pada hakikat dan mereka berpegang pada hakikat bahawa terdapat keistimewaan wartawan di sini.


Premise: In the face of the referendums that have taken place, private citizens' referendums in British Columbia, not only in Smithers, but in Ladner, Vancouver, and Prince George, all of the surveys that have been done, why is he prepared to ignore the expressed wishes of British Columbians and ram this Nisga'a treaty through the House of Commons without giving the people of British Columbia a chance to vote on it in a referendum?

Hypothesis: British columbians are red

No where does it mention the color of British Columbians

Dalam menghadapi referendum yang telah berlaku, referendum rakyat persendirian di British Columbia, bukan sahaja di Smithers, tetapi di Ladner, Vancouver, dan Prince George, semua tinjauan yang telah dilakukan, mengapa beliau bersedia untuk mengabaikan menyuarakan hasrat warga British Columbia dan melaksanakan perjanjian Nisga'a ini melalui Dewan Rakyat tanpa memberi peluang kepada rakyat British Columbia untuk mengundinya dalam referendum?


Premise: All right. It's admitted subject to the defendants' objection. P60 is the letter from School Board Member Geesey to the editor again. I think I noted that it was admitted. Over the objection already of the defendants, we'll reaffirm that, but you can make any other objections you want to on the record, but I think that was thoroughly argued at that time.

Hypothesis: There were not any further objections to the record

It said that they had the option to make further objections, but does not state whether or not they actually did.

Baiklah. Ia diakui tertakluk kepada bantahan defendan. P60 ialah surat daripada Ahli Lembaga Pengarah Sekolah Geesey kepada editor sekali lagi. Saya fikir saya perhatikan bahawa ia telah diterima. Mengenai bantahan defendan, kami akan mengesahkannya semula, tetapi anda boleh membuat sebarang bantahan lain yang anda mahukan dalam rekod, tetapi saya fikir ia telah dihujahkan secara menyeluruh pada masa itu.


Premise: Michel Dupont, of the FTQ; Michel Angers, of the CSN; Yves St-Pierre, of Action-Chmage; Jean-Louis Lavoie, of the Mauricie St-Jean-Baptiste society; Franois Brunette, of the AQDR; Martin Roy, of the UQTR students' association; and Brian Barton, of the Trois-Rivires Solidarit populaire.

Hypothesis: Michel Dupont is a girl.

Michel can be both a girls name and a boys name.

Michel Dupont, daripada FTQ; Michel Angers, daripada CSN; Yves St-Pierre, daripada Action-Chmage; Jean-Louis Lavoie, daripada masyarakat Mauricie St-Jean-Baptiste; Franois Brunette, daripada AQDR; Martin Roy, daripada persatuan pelajar UQTR; dan Brian Barton, dari Trois-Rivires Solidarit populaire.


Premise: But Russia has to make the decision. We can work with them on security matters, for example, but it's their call to make. So I'm not exactly sure where the vice president is coming from, but I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the world saying, we do it this way, so should you.

Hypothesis: Russia listens to America.

It is unclear if Russia listens to America. The system was confused by the context.

Tetapi Rusia perlu membuat keputusan. Kita boleh bekerjasama dengan mereka dalam hal keselamatan, contohnya, tetapi itu adalah panggilan mereka untuk membuat. Jadi saya tidak pasti dari mana datangnya naib presiden, tetapi saya fikir satu cara untuk kita akhirnya dilihat sebagai orang Amerika yang hodoh adalah untuk kita pergi ke seluruh dunia sambil berkata, kita melakukannya dengan cara ini, begitu juga dengan anda. .


Premise: Bill C-3 provides a dangerous and unnecessary exemption authorizing judges not to issue warrants for the taking of a sample if they believe that in doing so the impact on the individual's privacy and security would be grossly disproportionate to the public interest in the protection of society.

Hypothesis: Judges believe that the impact on an individual's privacy and security are grossly disproportionate to the public interest

The statement professes a view of judges which we cannot be sure about. The system could not understand the nuance whereby the context states judges can not issue warrants IF they believe it, but we don't know whether they actually do believe or not.

Rang Undang-Undang C-3 menyediakan pengecualian berbahaya dan tidak perlu yang membenarkan hakim untuk tidak mengeluarkan waran untuk pengambilan sampel jika mereka percaya bahawa dengan berbuat demikian kesan ke atas privasi dan keselamatan individu akan menjadi sangat tidak seimbang dengan kepentingan awam dalam perlindungan masyarakat .

Hakim percaya bahawa kesan ke atas privasi dan keselamatan individu adalah sangat tidak seimbang dengan kepentingan awam


Premise: Well, let me share with you why I have the issue that I have. About a week and a half ago I had a telephone dialogue with Eric because I had proposed to Eric the possibility that in light of your most current order and because you took out the issues of biases and things of that nature and because we're going to be called to trial by Eric, that maybe he should be speaking to Pat to see whether they would be willing to accept the affidavit in lieu of the testimony.

Hypothesis: You wonder if there may not be a chance to accept the (statement sworn in court to be true) instead of the statements (in court).

Nah, izinkan saya berkongsi dengan anda mengapa saya mempunyai masalah yang saya ada. Kira -kira seminggu setengah yang lalu saya mengadakan dialog telefon dengan Eric kerana saya telah mencadangkan kepada Eric kemungkinan bahawa berdasarkan perintah anda yang paling terkini dan kerana anda mengeluarkan isu -isu bias dan benda -benda itu dan kerana kami akan pergi Untuk dipanggil untuk dibicarakan oleh Eric, mungkin dia harus bercakap kepada Pat untuk melihat sama ada mereka bersedia menerima afidavit sebagai pengganti kesaksian.

Anda tertanya-tanya jika tidak ada peluang untuk menerima (pernyataan bersumpah di mahkamah adalah benar) dan bukannya kenyataan (di mahkamah).


Premise: Present in chambers are counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants, and in addition to that, let me ask that you enter your appearances specially, presumably as counsel for the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as "reporters."

Hypothesis: This quote is about dress code.

It talks about making appearances specially which could imply dress code, or anything else.

Hadir di dalam kamar ialah peguam untuk kedua-dua plaintif dan defendan, dan sebagai tambahan kepada itu, izinkan saya meminta anda memasukkan kehadiran anda secara khusus, mungkin sebagai peguam untuk individu yang kami rujuk dalam perintah kami secara kolektif sebagai "pemberita."

Petikan ini adalah mengenai kod pakaian.


Premise: The government is claiming that the agency will provide better, more cost effective service to the public, to business, to the provinces and territories by bringing about tax harmonization with the provinces and therefore huge tax savings resulting from the elimination of such things as duplication and overlaps in tax administration among various levels of government.

Hypothesis: the government sees only one revenue source

it is unclear from the statement if the government's revenue focus is on multiple sources

Kerajaan mendakwa bahawa agensi itu akan menyediakan perkhidmatan yang lebih baik, lebih kos efektif kepada orang ramai, kepada perniagaan, kepada wilayah dan wilayah dengan membawa penyelarasan cukai dengan wilayah dan oleh itu penjimatan cukai yang besar hasil daripada penghapusan perkara seperti pertindihan dan pertindihan dalam pentadbiran cukai di kalangan pelbagai peringkat kerajaan.

kerajaan melihat hanya satu sumber pendapatan


Premise: "This letter is in regard to the comments made by Beth Eveland from York Township in the June York Sunday News. I assure you that the Dover Area School Board is not going against its mission statement. In fact, if you read the statement, it says to educate our students so that they can be contributing members of society.

Hypothesis: Beth Eveland wants teachers from the Dover Area School district teach students to be contributing members of society.

The letter is "in regard to comments" made by Beth and we are assured that the Dover Area School board is not going against its mission statement of teaching students to be contributing members of society.  However, we don't know what Beth actually said in her letter.  We just know how her comments were interpreted.  She might not want that at all.  Maybe she works and just wants professional baby sitters.

"Surat ini adalah berkenaan dengan komen yang dibuat oleh Beth Eveland dari York Township dalam June York Sunday News. Saya memberi jaminan kepada anda bahawa Lembaga Sekolah Kawasan Dover tidak menentang kenyataan misinya. Malah, jika anda membaca kenyataan itu, ia berkata untuk mendidik pelajar kita supaya mereka boleh menyumbang ahli masyarakat.

Beth Eveland mahu guru dari daerah Dover Area School mengajar pelajar untuk menjadi ahli masyarakat yang menyumbang.


Premise: The petitioners state that at some point during the production of child pornography either a child or children have been victimized, that child pornography hurts children, that it can never be justified and that the possession of child pornography perpetuates the production of children pornography.

Hypothesis: Children are friends with Puppies.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Children are friends with Puppies, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Pempetisyen menyatakan bahawa pada satu ketika semasa penghasilan pornografi kanak-kanak sama ada kanak-kanak atau kanak-kanak telah menjadi mangsa, bahawa pornografi kanak-kanak menyakiti kanak-kanak, bahawa ia tidak boleh dibenarkan dan pemilikan pornografi kanak-kanak mengekalkan pengeluaran pornografi kanak-kanak.


Premise: We're pleased to see that under Bill C-43, the Minister of Revenue will retain responsibility for this Agency and it will be structured to allow for close Ministerial oversight and, in particular, that the Minister's power of inquiry into any activity of the Agency will be maintained.

Hypothesis: Bill C-43 was not voted for.

It is unclear if Bill C-43 was not voted for. The system was confused by the context.

Kami berbesar hati melihat bahawa di bawah Rang Undang-undang C-43, Menteri Hasil akan mengekalkan tanggungjawab untuk Agensi ini dan ia akan distrukturkan untuk membolehkan pengawasan rapi Menteri dan, khususnya, kuasa siasatan Menteri terhadap sebarang aktiviti Agensi akan dikekalkan.


Premise: On the other hand, they've said that it enhances state standards and critical thinking. In my mind, everything that you do in a classroom is teaching. And I don't necessarily think that's just in my mind. I believe that's true of all educators. The way I dress when I go to work tells my students something.

Hypothesis: The way the teacher dresses when going to work tells the students they are there to learn.

The writer only says "The way I dress when I go to work tells my students something" -- the thought is left unfinished. The model assumed the statement was true because it made sense, but it's just an assumption.

Sebaliknya, mereka telah mengatakan bahawa ia meningkatkan standard negeri dan pemikiran kritis. Pada fikiran saya, semua yang anda lakukan di dalam bilik darjah adalah mengajar. Dan saya tidak semestinya fikir itu hanya dalam fikiran saya. Saya percaya itu benar untuk semua pendidik. Cara saya berpakaian semasa saya pergi kerja memberitahu pelajar saya sesuatu.

Cara guru berpakaian ketika pergi kerja memberitahu pelajar mereka berada di sana untuk belajar.


Premise: In this article, Mr. Ryan said: ``By wanting to make the federal Parliament the judge on the clarity of the question and the referendum result, in contradiction with the prerogatives of the national assembly, the Chrtien government is violating the same principles he is claiming to defend, those of federalism and democracy''[...]

Hypothesis: Mr. Ryan is in politics

Dalam artikel ini, Encik Ryan berkata: ``Dengan mahu menjadikan Parlimen persekutuan sebagai hakim mengenai kejelasan soalan dan keputusan pungutan suara, bercanggah dengan hak prerogatif DUN, kerajaan Chrtien melanggar prinsip yang sama seperti beliau. mendakwa mempertahankan, federalisme dan demokrasi''[...]


Premise: Yes. I grew up in Dover, I attended Dover High School, graduated from Dover High School. My family, my extended family, lives in the Dover area, including my grandparents, my parents, and other relatives. My parents currently still live in the Dover area.

Hypothesis: Dover is located in Florida.

There is nothing in the text that suggests where Dover is located. It's difficult because perhaps the system knows where Dover actually is located in reality, and so it's judging the statement based on that knowledge instead.

ya. Saya dibesarkan di Dover, saya bersekolah di Dover High School, lulus dari Dover High School. Keluarga saya, keluarga besar saya, tinggal di kawasan Dover, termasuk datuk dan nenek saya, ibu bapa saya dan saudara-mara yang lain. Ibu bapa saya kini masih tinggal di kawasan Dover.


Premise: None of us will forget the images of sumo wrestlers stomping to drive out demons as the games began, of the glorious Ode to Joy and mass choirs and choruses around the world, of starry-night closing ceremonies and flower-laden horses, of floodlights dimming and thousands of paper lanterns becoming a shimmering sea of light.

Hypothesis: The speaker is discussing memories from more than six years ago.

There's no real indication in the text when these events happened, so we don't know for sure. It's difficult perhaps because it says none of us will forget, which somehow confuses the system, not sure really.

Tiada seorang pun daripada kita akan melupakan imej ahli gusti sumo yang menghentak-hentak untuk menghalau syaitan semasa permainan bermula, Ode to Joy yang mulia dan koir dan paduan suara massa di seluruh dunia, upacara penutupan malam berbintang dan kuda sarat bunga, lampu limpah yang dimalapkan. dan beribu-ribu tanglung kertas menjadi lautan cahaya yang berkilauan.

Penceramah sedang membincangkan kenangan lebih enam tahun lalu.


Premise: Pursuant to order made earlier this day, the House will now proceed to the consideration of a motion to adjourn the House for the purpose of discussing a specific and important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely the effect of a labour dispute on the movement of grain in the port of Vancouver.

Hypothesis: the statement is an old statement

it doesn't say how old the statement is, so it could be correct or incorrect!

Menurut perintah yang dibuat awal hari ini, Dewan kini akan meneruskan pertimbangan usul untuk menangguhkan Dewan bagi tujuan membincangkan perkara khusus dan penting yang memerlukan pertimbangan segera, iaitu kesan pertikaian buruh terhadap pergerakan bijirin di pelabuhan Vancouver.


Premise: It is of great sadness to many of us, including myself, to hear of the men and women in Regina, Saskatoon, Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton who have found that their opportunities over the past years have become so limited that they have not only contemplated but have taken steps to move.

Hypothesis: Nobody is moving to Regina, Saskatoon, Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton

It is not stated whether anyone is moving there, only that people are moving away. I think the system got it wrong because I phrased the statement like an incorrect one

Amat menyedihkan bagi kebanyakan kita, termasuk saya sendiri, mendengar tentang lelaki dan wanita di Regina, Saskatoon, Vancouver, Calgary dan Edmonton yang mendapati bahawa peluang mereka sejak beberapa tahun lalu menjadi sangat terhad sehingga mereka bukan sahaja memikirkan tetapi telah mengambil langkah untuk bergerak.

Tiada siapa yang berpindah ke Regina, Saskatoon, Vancouver, Calgary dan Edmonton


Premise: I ask the Prime Minister, who is perhaps better informed, where the terrible threat would be to Canada, to the Canadian federation, in having Quebec representation in the asbestos dispute in the WTO, even if this is, in the eyes of the Quebec Liberal MPs, asking too much, since they are so used to making no demands?

Hypothesis: The canadian federation was well informed

it does not say how well informed they were only that the primeminister was

Saya bertanya kepada Perdana Menteri, yang mungkin lebih berpengetahuan, di manakah ancaman yang mengerikan terhadap Kanada, kepada persekutuan Kanada, dengan mempunyai perwakilan Quebec dalam pertikaian asbestos di WTO, walaupun ini, di mata Liberal Quebec Ahli Parlimen, terlalu banyak bertanya, kerana mereka sudah terbiasa tidak membuat sebarang tuntutan?

Persekutuan Kanada telah dimaklumkan dengan baik


Premise: I am sure it could be agreed that it takes a particular form of genius to predict accurately the provinces most at risk for an upcoming year and then design an assistance program which actually extends more help to the farmers in neighbouring provinces than the farmers that actually need it.

Hypothesis: the program never went into affect

It does not say whether or not the program went into effect, making it neither correct or incorrect!

Saya pasti boleh dipersetujui bahawa ia memerlukan satu bentuk genius tertentu untuk meramalkan dengan tepat wilayah yang paling berisiko untuk tahun yang akan datang dan kemudian mereka bentuk program bantuan yang sebenarnya menghulurkan lebih banyak bantuan kepada petani di wilayah jiran daripada petani yang sebenarnya memerlukan. ia.


Premise: They call on parliament to amend the Criminal Code to ensure the right of all Canadians to die with dignity by allowing people with terminal, irreversible or debilitating illness the right to the assistance of a physician in ending their lives at a time of their choice, subject to six strict safeguards to prevent abuse and to ensure that the decision is free, informed, competent and voluntary.

Hypothesis: Physicians are only worried about their paychecks.

The text makes no mention about the proclivities of physicians; though one would hope that they are worried about more intangible things, they may very well be money hungry people. I'm not sure why the system missed this one.

Mereka menyeru parlimen untuk meminda Kanun Jenayah untuk memastikan hak semua warga Kanada untuk mati dengan maruah dengan membenarkan orang yang mempunyai penyakit terminal, tidak dapat dipulihkan atau melemahkan hak untuk mendapatkan bantuan doktor dalam menamatkan nyawa mereka pada masa pilihan mereka, tertakluk kepada enam perlindungan yang ketat untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan dan untuk memastikan bahawa keputusan itu adalah bebas, bermaklumat, cekap dan sukarela.

Doktor hanya bimbang tentang gaji mereka.


Premise: Well, to my understanding, intelligent design just presupposes that everything in life is too complex, that it has to be designed. But I also know that creationism was used repeatedly with the term -or, I'm sorry, not with the term "intelligent design." Intelligent design came up after the fact. But I do know that, in its original context, it was creationism that was being used. And when I think of creationists, again, I think of Young Earth creationists, and I do not subscribe to that way of thinking.

Hypothesis: Young Earth creationists have the same views

Nah, pada pemahaman saya, reka bentuk pintar hanya mengandaikan bahawa segala-galanya dalam kehidupan adalah terlalu kompleks, sehingga ia perlu direka. Tetapi saya juga tahu bahawa penciptaan telah digunakan berulang kali dengan istilah -atau, saya minta maaf, bukan dengan istilah "reka bentuk pintar." Reka bentuk pintar muncul selepas fakta itu. Tetapi saya tahu bahawa, dalam konteks asalnya, ia adalah penciptaan yang digunakan. Dan apabila saya berfikir tentang penciptaan, sekali lagi, saya memikirkan pencipta Bumi Muda, dan saya tidak melanggan cara berfikir itu.

Penciptaan Bumi Muda mempunyai pandangan yang sama


Premise: From the moment that, in an election campaign, there are posters on telephone poles or balconies showing the facial features of candidates-and we all know how important that is-to have one's picture on telephone poles or balconies, to have the photographs of just a few candidates on a ballot would be detrimental to those whose picture would not appear.

Hypothesis: having a candidate's facial features on a poster will not win them the election

Sejak saat itu, dalam kempen pilihan raya, terdapat poster pada tiang telefon atau balkoni yang menunjukkan ciri-ciri wajah calon-dan kita semua tahu betapa pentingnya-untuk mempunyai gambar seseorang pada tiang telefon atau balkoni, untuk mempunyai gambar-gambar segelintir calon dalam satu undi akan memudaratkan mereka yang gambarnya tidak akan muncul.

mempunyai raut wajah calon pada poster tidak akan memenangi mereka dalam pilihan raya


Premise: I've said it before, I say it again: I believe the president broke faith to the American people in the way that he took this nation to war. He said he would work through a real alliance. He said in Cincinnati we would plan carefully, we would take every precaution. Well, we didn't. And the result is our forces today are overextended.

Hypothesis: Americans have met with earl

Saya telah mengatakannya sebelum ini, saya katakan sekali lagi: Saya percaya presiden telah mematahkan kepercayaan rakyat Amerika dalam cara dia membawa negara ini berperang. Dia berkata dia akan bekerja melalui pakatan sebenar. Dia berkata di Cincinnati kami akan merancang dengan teliti, kami akan mengambil setiap langkah berjaga-jaga. Kami tidak melakukannya. Dan hasilnya adalah kuasa kita hari ini terlalu diperluaskan.


Premise: From March 4, 1993, when the damage control operation began, through the orchestrated in-house investigation, through the conceiving, conspiring, conniving and sanctioning of lies and misinformation, through the tampering with documents and the destruction of evidence, to the successful campaign to shut down the Somalia inquiry, people in high places for whom we are ultimately responsible have evaded accountability, escaped responsibility and eluded the efforts of properly constituted civilian authority - Parliament, government, a Royal Commission - to establish the truth.

Hypothesis: All corruption had been rooted out by 2018.

The article would seem to suggest that corruption is still an ongoing issue. The system only was given when the damage control operation began but was not given and ending date of the operation.

Mulai 4 Mac 1993, apabila operasi kawalan kerosakan bermula, melalui penyiasatan dalaman yang dirancang, melalui penyiasatan, konspirasi, berkomplot dan membenarkan pembohongan dan maklumat salah, melalui pengubahan dokumen dan pemusnahan bukti, kepada kempen yang berjaya. untuk menutup siasatan Somalia, orang di tempat tinggi yang kita bertanggungjawab akhirnya telah mengelak akauntabiliti, melepaskan tanggungjawab dan mengelak daripada usaha pihak berkuasa awam yang dibentuk dengan betul - Parlimen, kerajaan, Suruhanjaya Diraja - untuk menegakkan kebenaran.

Semua rasuah telah dihapuskan pada tahun 2018.


Premise: Mr. President, I want to go back to something Senator Kerry said earlier tonight and ask a follow-up of my own. He said -- and this will be a new question to you -- he said that you had never said whether you would like to overturn Roe v. Wade. So I'd ask you directly, would you like to?

Hypothesis: George Bush is the president

Tuan Yang Dipertua, saya ingin kembali kepada sesuatu yang Senator Kerry katakan awal malam ini dan meminta susulan saya sendiri. Dia berkata -- dan ini akan menjadi soalan baru kepada anda -- dia berkata bahawa anda tidak pernah mengatakan sama ada anda ingin membatalkan Roe lwn. Wade. Jadi saya akan bertanya kepada anda secara langsung, adakah anda mahu?


Premise: Well, we all make mistakes. I've been known to mangle a syllable or two myself, you know, if you know what I mean. I think credibility is important. It is going to be important for the president to be credible with Congress, important for the president to be credible with foreign nations.

Hypothesis: Congress has a member by the name of trump

Nah, kita semua melakukan kesilapan. Saya telah dikenali untuk memecahkan satu atau dua suku kata sendiri, anda tahu, jika anda tahu apa yang saya maksudkan. Saya rasa kredibiliti itu penting. Adalah penting bagi presiden untuk berwibawa dengan Kongres, penting bagi presiden untuk berwibawa dengan negara asing.

Kongres mempunyai ahli dengan nama trump


Premise: To my students taking a PSSA test, well, you know, I -- being an educator, I'm not in love with PSSA tests or standardized tests. But if you're asking me if I object to my daughter taking a standardized test with that information on it, of course not. I would hope that they would provide lots of academic information on those tests.

Hypothesis: The speaker provides examples of when standardized tests are not to be desired.

She seems ambivalent and does not provide examples of when she doesn't like standardized tests.

Kepada pelajar saya yang mengambil ujian PSSA, anda tahu, saya -- sebagai seorang pendidik, saya tidak suka dengan ujian PSSA atau ujian standard. Tetapi jika anda bertanya kepada saya sama ada saya membantah anak perempuan saya mengambil ujian piawai dengan maklumat itu, sudah tentu tidak. Saya berharap mereka akan memberikan banyak maklumat akademik mengenai ujian tersebut.

Pembesar suara menyediakan contoh apabila ujian piawai tidak diingini.


Premise: It is my view that it is a contempt of parliament to have the introduction of a bill so late, knowing full well the timetable in terms of the previous tobacco legislation, Bill C-71, and the time it takes for this parliament to pass Bill C-42, putting it through all the proper stages.

Hypothesis: It has taken a long time for parliament to pass Bill C-42

It never explicitly said that it is taking a long time to pass Bill C-42

Pada pendapat saya, adalah suatu penghinaan terhadap parlimen apabila rang undang-undang diperkenalkan lewat begitu, mengetahui sepenuhnya jadual waktu dari segi perundangan tembakau sebelum ini, Rang Undang-undang C-71, dan masa yang diperlukan untuk parlimen ini meluluskan Rang Undang-undang. C-42, meletakkannya melalui semua peringkat yang sepatutnya.

Ia telah mengambil masa yang lama untuk parlimen meluluskan RUU C-42


Premise: I remember a lady in Houston, Texas, told me, "Reading is the new civil right," and she's right. In order to make sure people have jobs for the 21st century, we've got to get it right in the education system, and we're beginning to close a minority achievement gap now.

Hypothesis: Everyone agrees with Bush that we are beginning to close a minority achievement gap now.

it doesn't state whether anyone agrees or not or who said that so it's neither and I'm not sure why it was difficult for the AI except that it was confused.

Saya masih ingat seorang wanita di Houston, Texas, memberitahu saya, "Membaca adalah hak sivil baharu," dan dia betul. Untuk memastikan orang ramai mempunyai pekerjaan untuk abad ke-21, kita perlu memperbaikinya dalam sistem pendidikan, dan kita mula merapatkan jurang pencapaian minoriti sekarang.

Semua orang bersetuju dengan Bush bahawa kita mula menutup jurang pencapaian minoriti sekarang.


Premise: My friend, Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, is pushing a law to make sure that Arab-Americans are treated with respect. So racial profiling isn't just an issue at local police forces. It's an issue throughout our society. And as we become a diverse society, we're going to have to deal with it more and more.

Hypothesis: Spencer Abraham was voted by bill

Rakan saya, Senator Spencer Abraham dari Michigan, sedang mendesak undang-undang untuk memastikan orang Arab-Amerika dilayan dengan hormat. Jadi pemprofilan perkauman bukan hanya isu di pasukan polis tempatan. Ia adalah isu di seluruh masyarakat kita. Dan apabila kita menjadi masyarakat yang pelbagai, kita perlu menanganinya dengan lebih banyak lagi.

Spencer Abraham telah diundi oleh rang undang-undang


Premise: If he's trying to allege that I'm a hard-hearted person and I don't care about children, he's absolutely wrong. We've spent $4.7 billion a year in the State of Texas for uninsured people. And they get health care. Now, it's not the most efficient way to get people health care.

Hypothesis: It was easy for the State of Texas to round up $4.7 billion

The statement doesn't mention how easy the State of Texas made $4.7 billion

Jika dia cuba menuduh saya seorang yang keras hati dan saya tidak kisah dengan kanak-kanak, dia silap sama sekali. Kami telah membelanjakan $4.7 bilion setahun di Negeri Texas untuk orang yang tidak diinsuranskan. Dan mereka mendapat penjagaan kesihatan. Kini, ia bukan cara paling berkesan untuk mendapatkan penjagaan kesihatan orang ramai.

Adalah mudah bagi Negeri Texas untuk mengumpulkan $4.7 bilion


Premise: ``this section, the Ministers and the minister responsible for the other Act referred to in paragraph (6)( a ) are responsible for determining whether or not the requirements referred to in that paragraph are met by that other Act or regulations made under that Act, and ( a ) if the Ministers and that other minister determine that the''

Hypothesis: The ministers are in charge of regulations.

While the ministers are in charge of sifting through and making decisions, there is no valid proof that the ministers are solely in charge of regulations.

``seksyen ini, Menteri-Menteri dan menteri yang bertanggungjawab bagi Akta lain yang disebut dalam perenggan (6)(a) bertanggungjawab untuk menentukan sama ada atau tidak kehendak yang disebut dalam perenggan itu dipenuhi oleh Akta atau peraturan lain yang dibuat di bawah itu. Bertindak, dan (a ) jika Menteri-menteri dan menteri lain itu menentukan bahawa''

Para menteri bertanggungjawab terhadap peraturan.


Premise: If I were a married person and had a child, I would want that child to have the faith that I believe, the faith that I cherish, the faith that I believe has made me a better person, a better citizen of Canada, a better member of my community and which, hopefully, some day would make me a star citizen in the eternity of heaven.

Hypothesis: Married people with children should have the same faith in order to become better people.

The statement simply says that if they were a married person with a child they want the child to share the same faith  because they believe their faith made them better. It did not say it was necessary in order to become better people.

Jika saya seorang yang sudah berkahwin dan mempunyai anak, saya ingin anak itu mempunyai iman yang saya percayai, iman yang saya hargai, iman yang saya percaya telah menjadikan saya orang yang lebih baik, warganegara Kanada yang lebih baik, lebih baik. ahli komuniti saya dan yang, mudah-mudahan, suatu hari nanti akan menjadikan saya warganegara bintang di syurga yang kekal.

Orang yang sudah berkahwin dan mempunyai anak harus mempunyai kepercayaan yang sama untuk menjadi orang yang lebih baik.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate the hon. member for Lac-Saint-Louis on his speech and I would like to ask him, following on the questions from my colleague from Saint-Bruno-Saint-Hubert, whether according to his information, he can confirm the rumours about the costs of this new firearm registration program, forecast to be in the order of $80 million, now having risen to $350 million.

Hypothesis: The speech was written in 1835

It does not say when the speech was written, making it neither correct or incorrect.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingin mengucapkan tahniah kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Lac-Saint-Louis atas ucapannya dan saya ingin bertanya kepadanya, berikutan soalan daripada rakan sekerja saya dari Saint-Bruno-Saint-Hubert, sama ada menurut maklumatnya, dia boleh mengesahkan khabar angin tentang kos ini program pendaftaran senjata api baharu, diramalkan dalam susunan $80 juta, kini telah meningkat kepada $350 juta.


Premise: While there may have been the very rare occasion when it was necessary to move the puck around a bit before approaching the net, I hope that all honourable senators will understand that I endeavoured to provide as accurate and complete information as was possible under the circumstances on all occasions.

Hypothesis: The senators enjoy tea in the afternoon.

It is neither, the statement does not say the enjoy tea or dislike tea.

Walaupun mungkin terdapat peristiwa yang sangat jarang berlaku apabila perlu untuk memindahkan puck itu sedikit sebelum mendekati jaring, saya berharap semua senator yang berhormat akan memahami bahawa saya berusaha untuk memberikan maklumat yang tepat dan lengkap yang mungkin di bawah keadaan pada semua majlis.

Para senator menikmati teh pada sebelah petang.


Premise: And we have got to again lead by example and help these other countries that are trying to straighten out their situations find the tools in order to do it. I just think, Jim, that this is an absolutely unique period in world history. The world has come together, as I said, they're looking to us.

Hypothesis: jim didn't care about what period history was in

I confused the system by mentioning what jim didn't care about (not correct or incorrect)

Dan kita perlu sekali lagi memimpin melalui teladan dan membantu negara-negara lain yang cuba memperbetulkan keadaan mereka mencari alat untuk melakukannya. Saya hanya fikir, Jim, bahawa ini adalah tempoh yang benar-benar unik dalam sejarah dunia. Dunia telah bersatu, seperti yang saya katakan, mereka melihat kepada kita.

jim tidak kisah tentang sejarah zaman apa


Premise: And one of the ways we're going to do it is, I'm going to work with my friend, John McCain, to further campaign finance reform so we get these incredible amounts of money out of the system and open it up to average people, so America is really represented by the people who make up America.

Hypothesis: Americans will possibly be better of with additional money.

Dan salah satu cara yang kami akan lakukan ialah, saya akan bekerjasama dengan rakan saya, John McCain, untuk meneruskan pembaharuan kewangan kempen supaya kami mendapatkan jumlah wang yang luar biasa ini daripada sistem dan membukanya kepada purata orang, jadi Amerika benar-benar diwakili oleh orang-orang yang membentuk Amerika.

Orang Amerika mungkin lebih baik dengan wang tambahan.


Premise: I think that it's in better shape now than he generally does. We've had some disagreements about that. He said that two divisions would have to report not ready for duty, and that's not what the joint chiefs say. But there's no doubt that we have to continue building up readiness and military strength.

Hypothesis: This is about a PC war strategy game.

This could be about a real army, I have also played PC war games where you have to build up your military over time, and it also sounds like a conversation that could be between people talking about a game. It's impossible to say for sure what it's about.

Saya fikir ia berada dalam keadaan yang lebih baik sekarang daripada yang biasa dia lakukan. Kami mempunyai beberapa perselisihan faham tentang itu. Beliau berkata bahawa dua bahagian perlu melaporkan tidak bersedia untuk bertugas, dan bukan itu yang dikatakan ketua bersama. Tetapi tidak syak lagi bahawa kita perlu terus membina kesediaan dan kekuatan ketenteraan.

Ini mengenai permainan strategi perang PC.


Premise: Senator Kerry, after 9/11 -- and this is a new question for you -- it seemed to me that the country came together as I've never seen it come together since World War II. But some of that seems to have melted away. I think it's fair to say we've become pretty polarized, perhaps because of the political season.

Hypothesis: The country is better than it was before 9/11.

It says some of it has melted away but doesn't specify if it's better or not.

Senator Kerry, selepas 9/11 -- dan ini adalah soalan baru untuk anda -- saya nampaknya negara ini bersatu kerana saya tidak pernah melihatnya bersatu sejak Perang Dunia II. Tetapi sebahagian daripada itu nampaknya telah cair. Saya fikir adalah adil untuk mengatakan bahawa kita telah menjadi agak terpolarisasi, mungkin kerana musim politik.

Negara ini lebih baik daripada sebelum 9/11.


Premise: Even the overall target referred to in the November 12 statement was put in doubt just eight days later-this is how permanent these commitments are-when the Prime Minister implied to Premiers Tobin and Klein that in his misguided desire to look better than the Americans on this issue, perhaps a new target should be adopted by lowering GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007.

Hypothesis: The Prime Minister achieved his goal of lower GHG emissions

It does not state whether or not the new lowered GHG emissions that were proposed was actually successful or not.

Malah sasaran keseluruhan yang dirujuk dalam kenyataan 12 November telah diragui hanya lapan hari kemudian-beginilah kekalnya komitmen ini-apabila Perdana Menteri menyiratkan kepada Perdana Menteri Tobin dan Klein bahawa dalam keinginannya yang sesat untuk kelihatan lebih baik daripada orang Amerika. isu ini, mungkin sasaran baru harus diguna pakai dengan menurunkan pelepasan GHG ke paras 1990 menjelang tahun 2007.

Perdana Menteri mencapai matlamatnya untuk mengurangkan pelepasan GHG


Premise: That is speaking about as directly as I can to Motions Nos. 9 and 10. By tabling regulations in parliament and having the House of Commons or a committee subsequently pass them, we want to make sure an effective check is placed on ministers or departmental officials in terms of a bill to arbitrarily implement changes in the legislation.

Hypothesis: The bill was rejected by parliment.

It is not clear is the bill was passed or rejected.

Itu bercakap secara langsung yang saya boleh kepada Usul No. 9 dan 10. Dengan membentangkan peraturan di parlimen dan meminta Dewan Rakyat atau jawatankuasa kemudiannya meluluskannya, kami ingin memastikan semakan berkesan dibuat ke atas menteri atau pegawai jabatan. dari segi rang undang-undang untuk melaksanakan perubahan dalam perundangan secara sewenang-wenangnya.

Rang undang-undang itu ditolak oleh parlimen.


Premise: Surely the Chair cannot be placed in a position of determining whether a document or a piece of paper, or whatever it is-it is certainly not a document of the House-can or cannot be circulated, or that the Speaker in some way should regulate the persons to whom such a document could be circulated.

Hypothesis: A legislator is speaking

It could be a legislator, or a person in the press, or a witness.

Sudah tentu Pengerusi tidak boleh diletakkan dalam kedudukan untuk menentukan sama ada dokumen atau sekeping kertas, atau apa sahaja itu-tentunya ia bukan dokumen Dewan-boleh atau tidak boleh diedarkan, atau Speaker dalam beberapa cara harus mengawal selia. orang yang kepadanya dokumen sedemikian boleh diedarkan.

Seorang penggubal undang-undang sedang bercakap


Premise: Mr. Speaker, considering that the value of water cannot be measured in dollars because it is priceless, will the federal government assert its jurisdiction over the export of water and take without delay the steps necessary to ensure that water will never be exported from Canada?

Hypothesis: Canadian water will make the country a lot of money

It's unknown if water would make Canada a lot of money

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, memandangkan nilai air tidak boleh diukur dalam dolar kerana ia tidak ternilai, adakah kerajaan persekutuan akan menegaskan bidang kuasanya ke atas eksport air dan mengambil tanpa berlengah-lengah langkah yang perlu untuk memastikan air tidak akan dieksport dari Kanada?

Air Kanada akan menjadikan negara ini banyak wang


Premise: So gun laws are important, no question about it, but so is loving children, and character education classes, and faith-based programs being a part of after-school programs. Some desperate child needs to have somebody put their arm around them and say, we love you.

Hypothesis: Children should love guns

It is never stated whether they should or should not, but the computer might think that since love and guns are in the same sentence that it is true.

Jadi undang-undang senjata api adalah penting, tiada persoalan mengenainya, tetapi begitu juga dengan kanak-kanak yang menyayangi, dan kelas pendidikan watak, dan program berasaskan kepercayaan menjadi sebahagian daripada program selepas sekolah. Sesetengah kanak-kanak yang terdesak perlu meminta seseorang memeluk mereka dan berkata, kami sayang kamu.


Premise: Well, I think again that illustrates why the authority is vested in Congress to make these judgments rather than in courts to make these affect whether the judgments, because we're not talking about the effect on an individual author, or an individual creator. What the Framers of the Constitution were concerned about is a gross judgment with respect to what might generally provide incentives to the population --

Hypothesis: congress doesn't really care about this issue

it doesn't state congress's opinion at all, the wording confused the system.

Baiklah, saya fikir sekali lagi yang menggambarkan sebab kuasa terletak pada Kongres untuk membuat penghakiman ini dan bukannya mahkamah untuk membuat ini mempengaruhi sama ada penghakiman, kerana kita tidak bercakap tentang kesan ke atas pengarang individu atau pencipta individu. Perkara yang dibimbangkan oleh Penggubal Perlembagaan ialah pertimbangan kasar berkenaan dengan perkara yang secara amnya boleh memberikan insentif kepada penduduk --


Premise: Senator Kerry, a new question. Let's talk about economic security. You pledged during the last debate that you would not raise taxes on those making less than $200,000 a year. But the price of everything is going up, and we all know it. Health-care costs, as you are talking about, is skyrocketing, the cost of the war.

Hypothesis: The factors that influence economic security have significantly changed since the last debate.

There is no mention of any changes, but it is not overtly stated that everything has stayed the same either.

Senator Kerry, soalan baru. Mari kita bercakap tentang keselamatan ekonomi. Anda berikrar semasa perbahasan terakhir bahawa anda tidak akan menaikkan cukai ke atas mereka yang berpendapatan kurang daripada $200,000 setahun. Tetapi harga segala-galanya meningkat, dan kita semua tahu. Kos penjagaan kesihatan, seperti yang anda bincangkan, melambung tinggi, kos perang.

Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keselamatan ekonomi telah berubah dengan ketara sejak perbahasan lalu.


Premise: I'm not sure what kind of view he's describing to me. I can just tell you, I'm a person who respects other people. I respect their -- I respect -- on the one hand he says he agrees with me and then he says he doesn't. I'm not sure where he's coming from. But I will be a tolerant person. I've been a tolerant person all my life. I just happen to believe strongly that marriage is between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: Respect and tolerance is the same thing

This is subjective, so it's neither true or untrue

Saya tidak pasti apa jenis pandangan yang dia gambarkan kepada saya. Saya cuma boleh beritahu, saya seorang yang menghormati orang lain. Saya menghormati mereka -- saya hormati -- di satu pihak dia berkata dia bersetuju dengan saya dan kemudian dia berkata dia tidak. Saya tidak pasti dari mana dia datang. Tetapi saya akan menjadi seorang yang bertolak ansur. Saya seorang yang bertolak ansur sepanjang hidup saya. Saya secara kebetulan sangat percaya bahawa perkahwinan adalah antara seorang lelaki dan seorang wanita.

Hormat dan toleransi adalah perkara yang sama


Premise: Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment. Now, the Government has responded to petitioners' argument in a way that betrays a simple but fundamental confusion.

Hypothesis: There is likely confusion among the petitioners

It says that the government's response betrays a simple confusion, but most of the petitioners may not be confused at all. I think the language is a little murky in the excerpt.

Pempetisyen mengemukakan lanjutan menyeluruh syarat sedia ada yang melebihi kuasa Kongres di bawah Fasal Hak Cipta dan ia melanggar Pindaan Pertama. Kini, Kerajaan telah menjawab hujah pempetisyen dengan cara yang mengkhianati kekeliruan yang mudah tetapi asas.

Kemungkinan terdapat kekeliruan di kalangan pempetisyen


Premise: But we have several issues. One is that when we filed our motion to quash last week, quite honestly, we thought we did it in a timely fashion because we filed it only after we were served with the subpoena. Your Honor summarily dismissed that motion to quash, so, in effect, if my reporters were to be called upon to testify today by the plaintiffs, they're undressed.

Hypothesis: The reporters are will testify on behalf of the defendant

A motion to quash by the defendant was denied and therefore the reporters who are the part of the defendant team may or may not be asked to testify.

Tetapi kita mempunyai beberapa isu. Salah satunya ialah apabila kami memfailkan usul untuk membatalkan minggu lepas, secara jujur, kami fikir kami melakukannya tepat pada masanya kerana kami memfailkannya hanya selepas kami disampaikan dengan sepina. Yang Berhormat dengan ringkasnya menolak usul untuk membatalkan itu, jadi, sebenarnya, jika wartawan saya dipanggil untuk memberi keterangan hari ini oleh plaintif, mereka tidak berpakaian.

Wartawan akan memberi keterangan bagi pihak defendan


Premise: I am sure if he had longer to ask his question he would have pointed out the fact that the former Progressive Conservative government was busy making important structural changes and if it would have had just a little more time it would have probably pursued the necessary fundamental changes we are discussing as the Progressive Conservative Party of 1999.

Hypothesis: The Progressive Conservative Party was first founded before 1965.

It's not clear from the text when it first originated, so we don't know for sure. It's difficult because 1999 is mentioned in the text so the system probably sees 1999 and "before 1965" and judges the statement as incorrect.

Saya pasti jika dia mempunyai masa yang lebih lama untuk bertanya soalannya, dia akan menunjukkan fakta bahawa bekas kerajaan Konservatif Progresif sedang sibuk membuat perubahan struktur yang penting dan jika ia hanya mempunyai sedikit masa lagi ia mungkin akan meneruskan perubahan asas yang diperlukan kita berbincang sebagai Parti Konservatif Progresif 1999.

Parti Konservatif Progresif mula-mula ditubuhkan sebelum 1965.


Premise: Based on this fundamental assessment, which provides reasonable confidence that those advocating the retention of their rights and privileges will find satisfaction under the new school system being implemented, and conscious of the overwhelming support for the school system itself, I will support the resolution with the hope that the debate surrounding it in this place will continue and that my confidence is not misplaced.

Hypothesis: Their confidence was misplaced

The context states that the person is hopeful their confidence is not misplaced, but we don't know for sure if it was or not in the end. So saying their confidence was misplaced is therefore neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect. The system read the text too literally where it says 'my confidence is not misplaced', and did not take into consideration the whole text and how it was a wish, not a statement.

Berdasarkan penilaian asas ini, yang memberikan keyakinan yang munasabah bahawa mereka yang menyokong pengekalan hak dan keistimewaan mereka akan mendapat kepuasan di bawah sistem persekolahan baharu yang dilaksanakan, dan menyedari sokongan padu terhadap sistem persekolahan itu sendiri, saya akan menyokong resolusi tersebut dengan semoga perdebatan di tempat ini akan berterusan dan keyakinan saya tidak tersasar.


Premise: It was sent out with no name on it, but it is under the heading "Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders," which is scheduled to meet today, November 23, at 4:30 p.m. The agenda has five items on it, four of which have nothing to do with a question of privilege.

Hypothesis: The message was sent by a human

Ia dihantar tanpa nama padanya, tetapi ia berada di bawah tajuk "Jawatankuasa Tetap Keistimewaan, Peraturan Tetap dan Perintah," yang dijadualkan bermesyuarat hari ini, 23 November, jam 4:30 petang. Agenda itu mempunyai lima perkara di atasnya, empat daripadanya tiada kaitan dengan soal keistimewaan.


Premise: New question. Last question. For you, Governor. And this flows somewhat out of the Boston debate. You, your running mate, your campaign officials have charged that Vice President Gore exaggerates, embellishes and stretches the facts, etcetera. Are you -- do you believe these are serious issues? This is a serious issue that the voters should use in deciding which one of you two men to vote for on November 7?

Hypothesis: This question was addressed to Mitt Romney.

He was a governor at the time and this question could have been addressed to him.

Soalan baru. Soalan terakhir. Untuk awak, Gabenor. Dan ini mengalir agak keluar dari perdebatan Boston. Anda, pasangan calon anda, pegawai kempen anda telah menuduh bahawa Naib Presiden Gore membesar-besarkan, memperindah dan membentangkan fakta, dan sebagainya. Adakah anda -- adakah anda percaya ini adalah isu yang serius? Ini adalah isu serius yang harus digunakan oleh pengundi dalam menentukan siapa di antara kamu berdua untuk mengundi pada 7 November?

Soalan ini ditujukan kepada Mitt Romney.


Premise: To that end, the report suggests that Statistics Canada should collect data on the supply of debt and equity financing to small and medium size enterprises, including, in particular, coverage of knowledge based industries, aboriginal enterprises and other sectors or subsectors determined from time to time to be of particular public interest.

Hypothesis: Statistics Canada did not exist yet in 1973.

There is no information provided in the text as to when the organization/entity was founded, therefore we don't know for sure. It's difficult because the system has a lot of trouble dealing with questions about existence for some reason.

Untuk tujuan itu, laporan itu mencadangkan bahawa Statistics Canada harus mengumpul data mengenai pembekalan pembiayaan hutang dan ekuiti kepada perusahaan kecil dan sederhana, termasuk, khususnya, liputan industri berasaskan pengetahuan, perusahaan orang asli dan sektor atau subsektor lain yang ditentukan dari semasa ke semasa. masa untuk menjadi kepentingan awam tertentu.

Statistik Kanada belum wujud lagi pada tahun 1973.


Premise: Any such amendments must be carefully drafted to ensure that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service's decision is adequately reviewed on application by the group, and to avoid a situation where the certificate becomes a bargaining chip in obtaining cooperation from such groups.

Hypothesis: The Canadian Security Intelligence Service only hires anglophones.

From the context, we do not know whether or not the Canadian Security Intelligence Service only hires anglophones, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Sebarang pindaan sedemikian mesti digubal dengan teliti untuk memastikan bahawa keputusan Perkhidmatan Perisikan Keselamatan Kanada disemak secukupnya semasa permohonan oleh kumpulan, dan untuk mengelakkan situasi di mana sijil menjadi cip tawar-menawar dalam mendapatkan kerjasama daripada kumpulan tersebut.

Perkhidmatan Perisikan Keselamatan Kanada hanya mengupah anglofon.


Premise: And it was a smart move because there's gas reserves up there. We need gas pipelines to bring the gas down. Gas is a clean fuel that we can burn to -- we need to make sure that if we decontrol our plants that there's mandatory -- that the plants must conform to clean air standards, the grandfathered plants, that's what we did in Texas.

Hypothesis: Unlike in Texas, these grandfathered plants did not conform to clean air standards.

The context seems to be an excerpt from an interview about what some company should do with regards to fuel production.  However, there is no indication either way if these plants followed the example set by Texas.  The uses of "unlike" and "not" in my sentence appear to have confused the system into labeling it as incorrect.

Dan ia adalah satu langkah yang bijak kerana terdapat rizab gas di atas sana. Kami memerlukan saluran paip gas untuk menurunkan gas. Gas ialah bahan api bersih yang boleh kita bakar -- kita perlu memastikan bahawa jika kita menyahkawal loji kita bahawa terdapat wajib -- loji mesti mematuhi piawaian udara bersih, loji datuk, itulah yang kami lakukan di Texas.

Tidak seperti di Texas, tumbuhan datuk ini tidak mematuhi piawaian udara bersih.


Premise: In the non-military area of influencing events around the world, the financial and economic are, the World Bank President Wilfinson said recently, Governor, that U.S. contributions to overseas development assistance is lower now almost than it has ever been. Is that a problem for you? Do you think -- what is your -- what is your idea about what the United States' obligations are? I'm talking about financial assistance and that sort of thing to other countries, the poor countries.

Hypothesis: The US government is ready to answer all questions about what the United State's obligations are, with confidence.

This is likely to be correct. It isn't stated in the context as a fact or as a false statement. This wasn't able to be picked up by the system because of the variation of words.

Dalam bidang bukan ketenteraan yang mempengaruhi peristiwa di seluruh dunia, kewangan dan ekonomi, Presiden Bank Dunia Wilfinson berkata baru-baru ini, Gabenor, bahawa sumbangan A.S. kepada bantuan pembangunan luar negara kini lebih rendah hampir berbanding sebelum ini. Adakah itu masalah untuk anda? Adakah anda fikir -- apakah anda -- apakah idea anda tentang kewajipan Amerika Syarikat? Saya bercakap tentang bantuan kewangan dan perkara semacam itu kepada negara lain, negara miskin.

Kerajaan AS bersedia menjawab semua soalan tentang kewajipan Amerika Syarikat, dengan yakin.