Premise: Mr. Putin is going to have to make the decision as to whether or not he wants to adhere to rule of law and normal accounting practices so that if countries and/or entities invest capital, there's a reasonable rate of return, a way to get the money out of the economy.

Hypothesis: Mr Putin needs to make a moral decision.

Mr Putin needs to figure out if he is going to go with his moral convictions or the law of the land (making money).

Encik Putin perlu membuat keputusan sama ada dia mahu mematuhi peraturan undang-undang dan amalan perakaunan biasa supaya jika negara dan/atau entiti melabur modal, terdapat kadar pulangan yang munasabah, satu cara untuk mendapatkan wang keluar dari ekonomi.

Encik Putin perlu membuat keputusan moral.


Premise: I understand those things could come up in the course of the deposition, and I'll rule on those as I can if I'm not instantly available. So whether I'm sitting at trial or not -- and likely it will be a day when I'm sitting in trial -- we'll deal with it.

Hypothesis: The writer makes rulings like a judge.

Based on context, making rulings and sitting at trial, the writer is a judge or rules like a judge. The model missed this logical inference.

Saya faham perkara itu boleh timbul semasa pemendapan, dan saya akan memutuskan perkara itu mengikut kemampuan saya jika saya tidak tersedia serta-merta. Jadi sama ada saya sedang duduk dalam perbicaraan atau tidak -- dan berkemungkinan ia akan menjadi hari apabila saya sedang duduk dalam perbicaraan -- kami akan menanganinya.

Penulis membuat keputusan seperti hakim.


Premise: You will note, honourable senators, that I am not following the Reform line of putting a lowered debt as a priority, because the economic growth that is so necessary for more jobs is better assured by a drop in taxes and charges against total payrolls, and because the debt-to-GDP ratio will probably drop to 63 per cent within three years.

Hypothesis: Reform supporters want the government to stop spending more money than it takes in.

Debt is owing more money than you have. When Reform supporters are "putting a lowered debt as a priority", it means they want the government to stop spending more than it collects.

Anda akan perhatikan, senator yang berhormat, bahawa saya tidak mengikuti garis Pembaharuan yang meletakkan hutang yang lebih rendah sebagai keutamaan, kerana pertumbuhan ekonomi yang sangat diperlukan untuk lebih banyak pekerjaan lebih terjamin dengan penurunan cukai dan caj terhadap jumlah gaji, dan kerana nisbah hutang kepada KDNK mungkin akan turun kepada 63 peratus dalam tempoh tiga tahun.

Penyokong reformasi mahu kerajaan berhenti membelanjakan lebih banyak wang daripada yang diperlukan.


Premise: While there may have been the very rare occasion when it was necessary to move the puck around a bit before approaching the net, I hope that all honourable senators will understand that I endeavoured to provide as accurate and complete information as was possible under the circumstances on all occasions.

Hypothesis: He did not want to lie.

It states that he wanted to provide as accurate and complete information as possible. He wanted to tell the truth.

Walaupun mungkin terdapat peristiwa yang sangat jarang berlaku apabila perlu untuk memindahkan puck itu sedikit sebelum mendekati jaring, saya berharap semua senator yang berhormat akan memahami bahawa saya berusaha untuk memberikan maklumat yang tepat dan lengkap yang mungkin di bawah keadaan pada semua majlis.


Premise: Expanding offences for which a youth is presumed to receive an adult sentence to include a pattern of convictions for serious violent offences and extending the group of offenders who are expected to receive an adult sentence to include 14 and 15 year olds will be welcomed by most Canadians.

Hypothesis: children are given adult trials in canada

it says in the context that they are looking to EXPAND the number of crimes that a child (14-15) can be tried as and adult. that means there already are crimes that a child has committed and been given an adult trial for.                                                                                So " children in Canada are given adult trials", is definitely correct.

Memperluas kesalahan yang mana seorang belia dianggap menerima hukuman dewasa untuk memasukkan corak sabitan bagi kesalahan kekerasan yang serius dan melanjutkan kumpulan pesalah yang dijangka menerima hukuman dewasa untuk memasukkan kanak-kanak berumur 14 dan 15 tahun akan dialu-alukan oleh kebanyakan orang Kanada .

kanak-kanak diberi ujian dewasa di kanada


Premise: We were heartened to hear of the government's plan to address the issue of student finance, and to establish the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, an $800-million foundation geared mainly toward funding for university research, especially in health, the environment, science and engineering.

Hypothesis: The Canadian Foundation for Innovation will benefit students.

The money is earmarked for university research, which will benefit students, AI didn't draw that conclusion.

Kami gembira mendengar rancangan kerajaan untuk menangani isu kewangan pelajar, dan menubuhkan Yayasan Inovasi Kanada, sebuah yayasan bernilai $800 juta yang ditujukan terutamanya untuk membiayai penyelidikan universiti, terutamanya dalam kesihatan, alam sekitar, sains dan kejuruteraan.

Yayasan Inovasi Kanada akan memberi manfaat kepada pelajar.


Premise: Hon. members will know that this official opposition attaches great importance to ensuring that parliament clearly states its intent in any bill that we consider or that we adopt, because if we do not, and the government is often sloppy in this area, we simply hand jurisdiction by default over to the courts, and that has been done far too many times.

Hypothesis: The author states in the article that  he believes the goverment is pretty messy upon doing it

Yang Berhormat ahli-ahli akan mengetahui bahawa pembangkang rasmi ini amat penting untuk memastikan parlimen menyatakan dengan jelas hasratnya dalam mana-mana rang undang-undang yang kita pertimbangkan atau yang kita pakai, kerana jika kita tidak melakukannya, dan kerajaan sering ceroboh dalam bidang ini, kita hanya menyerahkan bidang kuasa dengan ingkar kepada mahkamah, dan itu telah dilakukan terlalu banyak kali.

Penulis menyatakan dalam artikel itu bahawa dia percaya kerajaan agak kucar-kacir apabila melakukannya


Premise: It says, and I agree with my colleague from the New Democratic Party on this, that instead of cutting a total amount of $48 billion between now and the year 2003, cutting $48 billion in higher education, social assistance and health, the government will only be cutting $42 billion.

Hypothesis: The speaker is in agreement about the budget with his Democratic colleague.

I fooled the system just by changing the wording of a phrase from the text.

Ia mengatakan, dan saya bersetuju dengan rakan sekerja saya dari Parti Demokratik Baru mengenai perkara ini, bahawa daripada mengurangkan jumlah $48 bilion antara sekarang dan tahun 2003, memotong $48 bilion dalam pendidikan tinggi, bantuan sosial dan kesihatan, kerajaan hanya akan memotong $42 bilion.

Penceramah bersetuju mengenai belanjawan dengan rakan sekerja Demokratnya.


Premise: When they try to hurt us, they are hurting themselves, because now we can talk about committees, such as the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, the Standing Committee on Finance, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, and the Standing Committee on Health.

Hypothesis: There are more than 4 committees mentioned.

There are five committees mentioned. The system was confused by the number.

Apabila mereka cuba mencederakan kita, mereka mencederakan diri mereka sendiri, kerana sekarang kita boleh bercakap tentang jawatankuasa, seperti Jawatankuasa Tetap Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Mampan, Jawatankuasa Tetap Kewangan, Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa, Jawatankuasa Tetap. mengenai Keadilan dan Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Jawatankuasa Tetap Kesihatan.

Terdapat lebih daripada 4 jawatankuasa yang dinyatakan.


Premise: So I'm inclined to accept this language, you know, not word for word, only to the extent where it states, rather generically, "wherein an affidavit is provided," I would take that sentence and simply say that affidavits have been provided, rather than "wherein." It's somewhat artificial or a little strained as it relates to this case.

Hypothesis: The author disapproves of the language used in what he was accepting.

The author doesn't like the use of the word "wherein" in the context of what he's accepting. I feel that the AI has trouble differentiating when it comes to complex sentences such as this.

Jadi saya cenderung untuk menerima bahasa ini, anda tahu, bukan perkataan demi perkataan, hanya setakat di mana ia menyatakan, secara umum, "di mana afidavit disediakan," saya akan mengambil hukuman itu dan hanya mengatakan bahawa afidavit telah disediakan , bukannya "di mana." Ia agak tiruan atau sedikit tegang kerana ia berkaitan dengan kes ini.

Pengarang tidak bersetuju dengan bahasa yang digunakan dalam apa yang dia terima.


Premise: Local control or local input into resource management can be a good thing but it should not be based on anything other than the fact that there are people who are local to the area and who have a vested interest in the decisions that may affect them and may affect the land they are living on.

Hypothesis: people who have a vested interest in the land are the only ones that should have local control

people who are vested in the land they live on are the only people that local control or input should be based on

Kawalan tempatan atau input tempatan ke dalam pengurusan sumber boleh menjadi perkara yang baik tetapi ia tidak seharusnya berdasarkan apa-apa selain fakta bahawa terdapat orang yang berada di kawasan itu dan yang mempunyai kepentingan dalam keputusan yang boleh menjejaskan mereka dan mungkin menjejaskan tanah yang mereka diami.

orang yang mempunyai kepentingan dalam tanah adalah satu-satunya yang sepatutnya mempunyai kawalan tempatan


Premise: If we were to take the costs of colour cable TV, free condoms, free bleach for needles, the right to sue and legal costs involved, the right to vote and the administrative and logistical costs involved, gun registration and the cost of patronage appointees the Liberals have put on the parole board, just those costs alone, would we not be able to spend more money on hiring more officers or more judges without the increased raises to get rid of the backlog in the courts?

Hypothesis: The condoms and bleach mentioned cost the same.

Since the condoms and bleach are both free, they cost the same.

Jika kita mengambil kos TV kabel berwarna, kondom percuma, peluntur percuma untuk jarum, hak untuk mendakwa dan kos undang-undang yang terlibat, hak untuk mengundi dan kos pentadbiran dan logistik yang terlibat, pendaftaran senjata api dan kos pelantikan naungan Liberal telah meletakkan di papan parol, hanya kos itu sahaja, adakah kita tidak boleh membelanjakan lebih banyak wang untuk mengupah lebih ramai pegawai atau lebih banyak hakim tanpa kenaikan gaji untuk menghapuskan tunggakan di mahkamah?

Kondom dan peluntur yang disebutkan berharga sama.


Premise: Jim, I hope that we can come back to the subject of education because the governor made an extensive statement on it and I have a very different view than the one he expressed. But that having been said, I believe that -- well, first of all, let me say that the governor and I agree on some things where this subject is concerned.

Hypothesis: The governor and the speaker don't view education in the same way

It is correct because it is stated the speaker has a different view on education than the governor. I'm actually surprised the system thinks this is incorrect. I'm not sure why on this one

Jim, saya harap kita boleh kembali kepada subjek pendidikan kerana gabenor membuat kenyataan yang luas mengenainya dan saya mempunyai pandangan yang sangat berbeza daripada yang beliau nyatakan. Tetapi setelah diperkatakan, saya percaya bahawa -- baik, pertama sekali, izinkan saya mengatakan bahawa gabenor dan saya bersetuju dengan beberapa perkara yang berkaitan dengan perkara ini.

Gabenor dan penceramah tidak melihat pendidikan dengan cara yang sama


Premise: I would suggest that, if ever one were to search for an example of the lack of relevancy in 1999 of the Senate of Canada, the past two weeks of hearings in the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, Environment and Natural Resources stands as stark evidence in support of such a proposition.

Hypothesis: The hearings were irrelevant for the standing senate of energy.

The past two weeks of hearings lacked the relevancy needed for the standing senate committee.

Saya akan mencadangkan bahawa, jika seseorang ingin mencari contoh kekurangan kaitan pada tahun 1999 Senat Kanada, dua minggu lalu perbicaraan dalam Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat mengenai Tenaga, Alam Sekitar dan Sumber Asli berdiri sebagai bukti kukuh dalam menyokong cadangan tersebut.

Perbicaraan itu tidak relevan untuk senat tenaga yang masih berdiri.


Premise: That has the benefit of making sure our employers aren't breaking the law as they try to fill their workforce needs. It makes sure that the people coming across the border are humanely treated, that they're not kept in the shadows of our society, that they're able to go back and forth to see their families. See, the card, it'll have a period of time attached to it.

Hypothesis: The card will not always be legal to use.

The card will have a date attached to it, implying that at some point it will expire.

Itu mempunyai faedah untuk memastikan majikan kita tidak melanggar undang-undang semasa mereka cuba memenuhi keperluan tenaga kerja mereka. Ia memastikan bahawa orang yang melintasi sempadan dilayan secara berperikemanusiaan, bahawa mereka tidak disimpan dalam bayang-bayang masyarakat kita, bahawa mereka dapat berulang-alik untuk melihat keluarga mereka. Lihat, kad itu, ia akan mempunyai tempoh masa yang dilampirkan padanya.

Kad tidak akan sentiasa sah untuk digunakan.


Premise: Okay, and is your argument that we find and hold against their retrospective because there is some, at least plausible basis should so argument, to say that there can be a causal connection between the retrospective extension and some benefit that can be traced to those particular works through the retrospective extension, like dissemination? Is that your argument?

Hypothesis: This is the speaker's attempt to clarify their understanding of what someone else is saying.

Saying "is your argument that..." and ending with "is that your argument?" indicates they are trying to clarify their understanding of what someone else is saying.

Baiklah, dan adakah hujah anda yang kami temui dan tahan terhadap retrospektif mereka kerana terdapat beberapa, sekurang-kurangnya asas yang munasabah yang sepatutnya menjadi hujah, untuk mengatakan bahawa mungkin terdapat hubungan sebab akibat antara lanjutan retrospektif dan beberapa faedah yang boleh dikesan kepada yang tertentu berfungsi melalui sambungan retrospektif, seperti penyebaran? Adakah itu hujah anda?

Ini adalah percubaan penceramah untuk menjelaskan pemahaman mereka tentang apa yang orang lain katakan.


Premise: Based on the federal decision announced in the 1995 budget of the Minister of Finance, it was initially anticipated that, by the year 2003, federal transfers to the provinces for health, higher education and social assistance would be subject to cumulative cuts totalling $48 billion.

Hypothesis: Funding cuts would be expected to impact schools, among other things

Berdasarkan keputusan persekutuan yang diumumkan dalam belanjawan Menteri Kewangan 1995, pada mulanya dijangkakan bahawa, menjelang tahun 2003, pemindahan persekutuan ke wilayah untuk kesihatan, pendidikan tinggi dan bantuan sosial akan tertakluk kepada pemotongan kumulatif berjumlah $48 bilion.

Pemotongan pembiayaan dijangka akan memberi kesan kepada sekolah, antara lain


Premise: To that end, the report suggests that Statistics Canada should collect data on the supply of debt and equity financing to small and medium size enterprises, including, in particular, coverage of knowledge based industries, aboriginal enterprises and other sectors or subsectors determined from time to time to be of particular public interest.

Hypothesis: The paper is about Statistics Canada.

Untuk tujuan itu, laporan itu mencadangkan bahawa Statistics Canada harus mengumpul data mengenai pembekalan pembiayaan hutang dan ekuiti kepada perusahaan kecil dan sederhana, termasuk, khususnya, liputan industri berasaskan pengetahuan, perusahaan orang asli dan sektor atau subsektor lain yang ditentukan dari semasa ke semasa. masa untuk menjadi kepentingan awam tertentu.

Makalah ini adalah mengenai Statistik Kanada.


Premise: It will be a huge down payment for a pretty darn good system. If you allow -- also allow -- convince states to -- allow states to allow the mother to match some of the children's health insurance money with it, the pool purchasing power. And to make health care more affordable, allow business associations like the National Federal of Independent Business or the Chamber of Commerce or the National Restaurant Association to write association plans across jurisdictional lines so that small businesses have got the capacity to have national pooling to drive the cost of insurance down.

Hypothesis: National Restaurant Association has a l

Ia akan menjadi bayaran muka yang besar untuk sistem yang sangat bagus. Jika anda membenarkan -- juga membenarkan -- meyakinkan negeri-negeri untuk -- membenarkan negeri membenarkan ibu memadankan beberapa wang insurans kesihatan anak-anak dengannya, kuasa beli kumpulan. Dan untuk menjadikan penjagaan kesihatan lebih berpatutan, benarkan persatuan perniagaan seperti Persekutuan Perniagaan Bebas Kebangsaan atau Dewan Perniagaan atau Persatuan Restoran Kebangsaan menulis rancangan persatuan merentas bidang kuasa supaya perniagaan kecil mempunyai keupayaan untuk mempunyai pengumpulan nasional untuk memacu kos insurans turun.

Persatuan Restoran Kebangsaan mempunyai l


Premise: I take this opportunity to pay my respects to my Bloc Quebecois predecessor, Laurent Lavigne, to whom I wish a well deserved rest before another referendum on Quebec's political future is called and he is again called upon to help build a country, a plan that he must not have lost sight of in his retreat in Saint-Stanislas-de-Kostka.

Hypothesis: Laurent Lavigne has not lost his sight.

Laurent Lavigne has not lost his eyesight. It confused the machine because of the different possible meanings of the word "sight". He may or may not have lost his political vision, but his sight remains unaffected.

Saya mengambil kesempatan ini untuk memberi penghormatan kepada pendahulu Bloc Quebecois saya, Laurent Lavigne, yang saya harapkan dapat berehat dengan sewajarnya sebelum satu lagi referendum mengenai masa depan politik Quebec diadakan dan beliau sekali lagi dipanggil untuk membantu membina sebuah negara, satu rancangan yang dia pasti tidak terlepas pandang semasa berundur di Saint-Stanislas-de-Kostka.

Laurent Lavigne tidak kehilangan penglihatannya.


Premise: I've developed -- put out money in my budget to expand community health centers all around the country. These are places where people can get primary care. Secondly -- and they're good. They're very important parts of the safety net of health care. Secondly, that you get a $2,000 rebate from the government if you're a family of $30,000 or less -- it scales down as you get higher -- that you can use to purchase health care in the private markets.

Hypothesis: This speaker very much wants people to engage in purchasing insurance in the private marketplace

The entire reason for putting forth the rebate is to encourage the purchase of private insurance, as detailed by this speaker

Saya telah membangunkan -- mengeluarkan wang dalam bajet saya untuk mengembangkan pusat kesihatan masyarakat di seluruh negara. Ini adalah tempat di mana orang ramai boleh mendapatkan penjagaan primer. Kedua -- dan mereka bagus. Ia adalah bahagian yang sangat penting dalam jaringan keselamatan penjagaan kesihatan. Kedua, anda mendapat rebat $2,000 daripada kerajaan jika anda sekeluarga $30,000 atau kurang -- ia berkurangan apabila anda semakin tinggi -- yang boleh anda gunakan untuk membeli penjagaan kesihatan di pasaran swasta.

Penceramah ini sangat mahu orang ramai terlibat dalam pembelian insurans di pasaran persendirian


Premise: I would agree. And I also agree that most police officers, of course, are doing a good job and hate this practice also. I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts not long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

Hypothesis: I don't think all cops are doing a good job

I believe most (not all) police officers are doing a good job. I think the system got it wrong because the statement is phrased similarly to an incorrect statement

Saya akan bersetuju. Dan saya juga bersetuju bahawa kebanyakan pegawai polis, tentu saja, melakukan pekerjaan yang baik dan membenci amalan ini juga. Saya bercakap dengan seorang pegawai polis Afrika-Amerika di Springfield, Massachusetts tidak lama dahulu yang menimbulkan persoalan ini dan mengatakan bahawa pada pendapatnya salah satu penyelesaian terbesar adalah dalam latihan.

Saya tidak fikir semua polis menjalankan tugas dengan baik


Premise: And the compounding rate of interest effect will make it more likely that the Social Security system is solvent for our children and our grandchildren. I will work with Republicans and Democrats. It'll be a vital issue in my second term. It is an issue that I am willing to take on, and so I'll bring Republicans and Democrats together.

Hypothesis: Social security is an issue that many Democrats and Republicans disagree about.

The passage states that the person will bring Republicans and Democrats together, implying that social security is an issue that many Democrats and Republicans disagree about.

Dan kadar kompaun kesan faedah akan menjadikannya lebih berkemungkinan bahawa sistem Keselamatan Sosial adalah pelarut untuk anak-anak dan cucu-cucu kita. Saya akan bekerjasama dengan Republikan dan Demokrat. Ia akan menjadi isu penting dalam penggal kedua saya. Ia adalah isu yang saya bersedia untuk mengambilnya, dan oleh itu saya akan membawa Republikan dan Demokrat bersama-sama.

Keselamatan sosial ialah isu yang tidak dipersetujui oleh ramai Demokrat dan Republikan.


Premise: Could the government explain what ongoing action it is taking, what progress has been made to date and when a final resolution is expected, with respect to the present situation whereby American shipbuilders have open access to the Canadian market, yet Canadian commercial vessels are prohibited for sale in the USA?

Hypothesis: People who make a living selling ships in the USA can go to Canada and sell them there  freely

The system states that American shipbuilders have open access to Canadian markets (e.g they can trade freely). The system likely could not understand the term to trade freely/sell freely, as well as the term 'to make a living' meaning to be employed doing something.

Bolehkah kerajaan menjelaskan tindakan berterusan yang sedang diambil, kemajuan yang telah dibuat setakat ini dan bila resolusi muktamad dijangka, berkenaan dengan situasi sekarang di mana pembuat kapal Amerika mempunyai akses terbuka ke pasaran Kanada, namun kapal komersial Kanada dilarang untuk jualan di Amerika Syarikat?

Orang yang mencari rezeki dengan menjual kapal di AS boleh pergi ke Kanada dan menjualnya di sana secara bebas


Premise: Like it or not, we are now -- the United States is now the natural leader of the world. All these other countries are looking to us. Now, just because we cannot be involved everywhere, and shouldn't be, doesn't mean that we should shy away from going in anywhere.

Hypothesis: The speaker is from the United States.

It's definitely correct because the speaker uses phrases like "we" and "us" when referring to the United States, so it seems clear they are from the US. It's difficult because it's not stated explicitly I suppose.

Suka atau tidak, kita kini -- Amerika Syarikat kini adalah pemimpin semula jadi dunia. Semua negara lain ini mencari kita. Sekarang, hanya kerana kita tidak boleh terlibat di mana-mana, dan tidak sepatutnya, tidak bermakna kita harus mengelak daripada pergi ke mana-mana.

Penceramah berasal dari Amerika Syarikat.


Premise: When he approached Mr. Landry, did the Prime Minister tell him that this intervention in the field of education was raising hackles in Quebec and that everyone involved-students, the academic community and federalists and sovereignists alike-strongly opposed the federal government's intrusion into an area of provincial jurisdiction?

Hypothesis: The narrator is expressing what he believes to be the truth

He is seeking to ensure that the prime minister gave all the information he thinks was important

Apabila dia mendekati Encik Landry, adakah Perdana Menteri memberitahunya bahawa campur tangan dalam bidang pendidikan ini menimbulkan masalah di Quebec dan bahawa semua orang yang terlibat-pelajar, komuniti akademik dan federalis dan negara berdaulat sama-sama kuat menentang pencerobohan kerajaan persekutuan ke dalam kawasan bidang kuasa wilayah?

Pencerita sedang menyatakan apa yang dia percaya sebagai kebenaran


Premise: I have got a comprehensive strategy to not only chase down the Al Qaida, wherever it exists -- and we're making progress; three-quarters of Al Qaida leaders have been brought to justice -- but to make sure that countries that harbor terrorists are held to account.

Hypothesis: Al Qaida leaders are unlikely to escape justice.

3 quarters or 75% or Al Qaida leaders have been brought to justice.  This means that if you are an Al Qaida leader you only have a 25% chance of evading justice which is definitely correct.

Saya mempunyai strategi yang komprehensif untuk bukan sahaja mengejar Al Qaida, di mana sahaja ia wujud -- dan kami sedang membuat kemajuan; tiga perempat daripada pemimpin Al Qaida telah dibawa ke muka pengadilan -- tetapi untuk memastikan negara-negara yang menyimpan pengganas dipertanggungjawabkan.

Pemimpin Al Qaida tidak mungkin terlepas dari keadilan.


Premise: Well, let's stay on the subject for a moment. New question related to this. I figured this out; in the last 20 years there have been eight major actions that involved the introduction of U.S. ground, air or naval forces. Let me name them. Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. If you had been president for any of those interventions, would any of those interventions not have happened?

Hypothesis: The person being addressed is being interviewed.

They are being asked questions of a political nature. The system did not understand this.

Baiklah, mari kita kekal pada subjek itu seketika. Soalan baru yang berkaitan dengan ini. Saya fikir ini; dalam 20 tahun kebelakangan ini terdapat lapan tindakan utama yang melibatkan pengenalan tentera darat, udara atau tentera laut A.S. Biar saya namakan mereka. Lubnan, Grenada, Panama, Teluk Parsi, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. Jika anda pernah menjadi presiden untuk mana-mana campur tangan tersebut, adakah mana-mana campur tangan itu tidak akan berlaku?


Premise: Senator, the last debate, President Bush said he did not favor a draft. You agreed with him. But our National Guard and Reserve forces are being severely strained because many of them are being held beyond their enlistments. Some of them say that it's a back-door draft.

Hypothesis: The senator agreed with George W on the draft.

Senator, perbahasan terakhir, Presiden Bush berkata beliau tidak memihak kepada draf. Anda bersetuju dengannya. Tetapi pasukan Pengawal Kebangsaan dan Simpanan kita sedang tertekan dengan teruk kerana ramai daripada mereka ditahan di luar pendaftaran mereka. Sesetengah daripada mereka mengatakan bahawa ia adalah draf pintu belakang.

Senator bersetuju dengan George W mengenai draf itu.


Premise: In this case the regional district of Campbell River is serving as the umbrella organization and the overall administration for a variety of community groups which have joined together to submit a comprehensive plan to improve the habitat for chinook, coho and steelhead in the Campbell River area.

Hypothesis: The coho needs a better habitat.

I made an assumption based on the facts.  This made it difficult.

Dalam kes ini, daerah serantau Sungai Campbell berfungsi sebagai organisasi payung dan pentadbiran keseluruhan untuk pelbagai kumpulan masyarakat yang telah bergabung untuk mengemukakan pelan komprehensif untuk menambah baik habitat untuk chinook, coho dan steelhead di kawasan Sungai Campbell.

Coho memerlukan habitat yang lebih baik.


Premise: The Butlers were forced to hire a lawyer and appeal the judge's orders on the grounds that, first, the judge applied an improper standard of proof; second, he relied on inadmissible evidence and hearsay; third, the hearing violated the principles of fundamental justice; fourth, the parents were not properly informed of the nature of the hearing; and fifth, the parents were not given an opportunity to call evidence.

Hypothesis: The butlers hired a lawyer and he decided the judge had made some errors in decision making.

I believe it is definitely correct because it states that they were going to appeal the order and for it to be appealed the judge had ot make some errors as stated in the context.

Butlers terpaksa mengupah peguam dan merayu perintah hakim atas alasan, pertama, hakim menggunakan piawaian pembuktian yang tidak wajar; kedua, dia bergantung pada bukti yang tidak boleh diterima dan khabar angin; ketiga, perbicaraan itu melanggar prinsip keadilan asasi; keempat, ibu bapa tidak dimaklumkan dengan betul tentang sifat pendengaran; dan kelima, ibu bapa tidak diberi peluang untuk memanggil bukti.

Butlers mengupah seorang peguam dan dia memutuskan hakim telah membuat beberapa kesilapan dalam membuat keputusan.


Premise: The members on the government side of the House should listen to the Law Society of British Columbia which wrote to the solicitor general and said an essential principle of a democratic government is that all people are equal before the law and are equally entitled to fairness and due process.

Hypothesis: It is fair and just that everyone be treated the same.

the meaning is the same but the wording is different so the AI marked it as possibly having unknown information added and made it neither.

Ahli-ahli di sebelah kerajaan Dewan harus mendengar Persatuan Undang-undang British Columbia yang menulis surat kepada peguam negara dan berkata prinsip penting kerajaan demokratik ialah semua orang adalah sama di sisi undang-undang dan sama-sama berhak untuk adil dan wajar. proses.

Adalah adil dan saksama bahawa semua orang dilayan sama.


Premise: As we know, the business world, including the Conseil du patronat du Qubec, the Quebec chamber of commerce and the Quebec and Canadian association of manufacturers et exporters came and told the committee that Quebec should be allowed to manage its education sector, and that opting out with full compensation should be allowed, so that the money could be used based on Quebec's needs and realities.

Hypothesis: Quebec want to manage their own finances with their own needs in mind

As stated in the article, the Council and Quebec as a whole want to leave committee with no repercussions so that they can allocate money where they see fit.

Seperti yang kita ketahui, dunia perniagaan, termasuk Conseil du patronat du Qubec, dewan perniagaan Quebec dan persatuan pengilang dan pengeksport Quebec dan Kanada datang dan memberitahu jawatankuasa bahawa Quebec harus dibenarkan untuk menguruskan sektor pendidikannya, dan bahawa memilih keluar dengan pampasan penuh harus dibenarkan, supaya wang itu boleh digunakan berdasarkan keperluan dan realiti Quebec.

Quebec mahu menguruskan kewangan mereka sendiri dengan mengambil kira keperluan mereka sendiri


Premise: In the member's interpretation of that clause I would ask him if he understands that to mean just dockside and in close vicinity to the grain handling on that end, or does it really apply to the whole myriad of unions involved in grain handling and rail transport from the prairies?

Hypothesis: The phrase "grain handling" is mentioned more than once in the text.

It's mentioned twice, which is more than once. It's difficult because I don't think the system understands what to count when I say this type of statement.

Dalam tafsiran ahli fasal itu, saya akan bertanya kepadanya sama ada dia faham maksudnya hanya di tepi dermaga dan berdekatan dengan pengendalian bijirin di hujung itu, atau adakah ia benar-benar terpakai kepada seluruh seribu kesatuan yang terlibat dalam pengendalian bijirin dan pengangkutan rel dari padang rumput?

Frasa "pengendalian bijirin" disebut lebih daripada sekali dalam teks.


Premise: Our concern with the budget is not only its failure to acknowledge that, but that it actually worsens the situation by not dealing with unemployment, by not dealing with wage inequities, by not dealing with homelessness, by not dealing with poverty and by not dealing with deplorable living conditions on and off reserves in the country.

Hypothesis: The budget does not have any effect on wage equality or lack thereof.

The original statement says that the budget does not deal with wage inequality, and my statement says that the budget has no effect on the lack of wage equality. The system was fooled because it believed I was saying that there was wage equality due to my use of the word "equality."

Kebimbangan kita terhadap bajet bukan sahaja kegagalannya untuk mengakuinya, tetapi ia sebenarnya memburukkan keadaan dengan tidak menangani pengangguran, dengan tidak menangani ketidaksamaan gaji, dengan tidak menangani gelandangan, dengan tidak menangani kemiskinan dan dengan tidak menangani keadaan hidup yang menyedihkan di dalam dan di luar rizab di negara ini.

Bajet tidak mempunyai sebarang kesan ke atas kesamarataan gaji atau kekurangannya.


Premise: Now, there's more work to do. Remains to be seen, however, whether or not there's going to be a political settlement in Kosovo, and I certainly hope there is one. Also on record as saying at some point in time I hope our European friends become the peacekeepers in Bosnia and in the Balkans.

Hypothesis: The speaker does not mention anything about the United States.

The system seems to have improved its grasp on double negatives, so I had to trick it with a key term not included in the original context.  The speaker mentions Kosovo, Bosnia, the Balkans, and Europe as a whole, but definitely does not mention the United States.

Sekarang, ada lagi kerja yang perlu dilakukan. Masih belum dapat dilihat, bagaimanapun, sama ada akan ada penyelesaian politik di Kosovo atau tidak, dan saya pastinya berharap ada satu penyelesaian. Juga dalam rekod sebagai berkata pada suatu ketika saya berharap rakan-rakan Eropah kita menjadi pasukan pengaman di Bosnia dan di Balkan.

Penceramah tidak menyebut apa-apa tentang Amerika Syarikat.


Premise: Yes, but take one of the early extensions, just extending a -- an already granted patent to an inventor for an extra 10 years. How can that be squared with the language of the provision? Maybe Congress did it, but maybe it acted improperly when it did it.

Hypothesis: The interpretation of giving and helping is seen as questionable when looking at some set regulations.

The reason being the statement looks at the process of giving and providing and it questions how can the act of helping and providing be squared with the regulations. So it is being seen as questionable.

Ya, tetapi ambil salah satu sambungan awal, hanya melanjutkan -- paten yang telah diberikan kepada pencipta selama 10 tahun tambahan. Bagaimanakah ia boleh diselaraskan dengan bahasa peruntukan? Mungkin Kongres melakukannya, tetapi mungkin ia bertindak tidak wajar apabila ia melakukannya.

Tafsiran memberi dan membantu dilihat sebagai tanda tanya apabila melihat beberapa peraturan yang ditetapkan.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, an internal audit done in 1997 by Consulting and Audit Canada has confirmed what the Bloc Quebecois' analysis clearly showed- political pressure was brought to bear on the administrative staff of Human Resources Development Canada in order to speed up the grant approval process.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker, an internal audit done in 1990+7 by Consulting and Audit Canada has confirmed what the Bloc Quebecois

1990+7 is 1997, the year mentioned in the statement! I'm not really sure why the model struggled with that.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, audit dalaman yang dilakukan pada tahun 1997 oleh Perunding dan Audit Kanada telah mengesahkan apa yang jelas ditunjukkan oleh analisis Blok Quebecois- tekanan politik telah dibawa ke atas kakitangan pentadbiran Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Kanada untuk mempercepatkan proses kelulusan geran .

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, audit dalaman yang dilakukan pada tahun 1990+7 oleh Consulting and Audit Canada telah mengesahkan apa yang dilakukan oleh Bloc Quebecois


Premise: Mr. Speaker, just to show how absurd the icebreaking policy is, the ships providing ferry service between Quebec City and Lvis, Baie-Comeau and Matane, and Rivire-du-Loup and Saint-Simon will have to pay icebreaking fees this winter, while federal government vessels and Newfoundland ferries will not.

Hypothesis: The government is being biased by excepting other ferries from paying the fees

The government  vessels and Newfoundland ferries will operate without paying any money

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, hanya untuk menunjukkan betapa tidak masuk akalnya dasar pecah ais, kapal-kapal yang menyediakan perkhidmatan feri antara Bandaraya Quebec dan Lvis, Baie-Comeau dan Matane, dan Rivire-du-Loup dan Saint-Simon perlu membayar yuran pecah ais pada musim sejuk ini, manakala kapal kerajaan persekutuan dan feri Newfoundland tidak akan.

Kerajaan bersikap berat sebelah dengan menerima feri lain daripada membayar yuran


Premise: Well, the line comes from deciding what the First Amendment interest is, and if this Court heed the First Amendment interest off of this difference between selecting who gets the benefit of 20 years of extension and just simply legislating in a general way prospectively, then this Court could hold, with respect to the prospective, that it's not even necessary to raise the intermediate scrutiny in that context, but again, for Ashwander reasons we don't think that this Court should address the prospective aspect of the CTEA even under the First Amendment.

Hypothesis: Ashwander has more than five letters but less than sixteen.

Ashwander has nine letters, therefore it was more than five and less than sixteen.  Therefore the statement "Ashwander has more than five letters but less than sixteen" is definitely correct.

Nah, garisnya datang daripada memutuskan kepentingan Pindaan Pertama, dan jika Mahkamah ini mengambil kira kepentingan Pindaan Pertama daripada perbezaan ini antara memilih siapa yang mendapat faedah pelanjutan 20 tahun dan hanya sekadar menggubal undang-undang secara umum secara prospektif, maka ini Mahkamah boleh berpendirian, berkenaan dengan bakal calon, bahawa ia tidak perlu untuk meningkatkan penelitian pertengahan dalam konteks itu, tetapi sekali lagi, atas sebab Ashwander kami tidak fikir Mahkamah ini harus menangani aspek prospektif CTEA walaupun di bawah Pertama. Pindaan.

Ashwander mempunyai lebih daripada lima huruf tetapi kurang daripada enam belas.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, after rising in the House on March 16 to ask the government about the future plans for Devco I was attacked by the Minister of Natural Resources who, when asked by a fellow government member about the Liberal position on Devco, the Donkin mine and other issues of grave concern to the people of Cape Breton Island, resorted to the worst form of heckling and insult.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Natural Resources does not appear to be a very nice person.

It's definitely correct because they were said to verbally attack someone and heckle them and insult them, so they don't seem very nice. It's difficult because the system might not understand why heckling and insulting someone makes someone a "not very nice" person.,

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, selepas bangkit di Dewan pada 16 Mac untuk bertanya kepada kerajaan tentang rancangan masa depan untuk Devco I telah diserang oleh Menteri Sumber Asli yang apabila ditanya oleh rakan-rakan kerajaan mengenai kedudukan Liberal di Devco, lombong Donkin. dan isu-isu lain yang membimbangkan penduduk Pulau Cape Breton, menggunakan bentuk makian dan penghinaan yang paling teruk.

Menteri Sumber Asli nampaknya bukan seorang yang baik.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, how does the minister explain that the only member of the jury of experts to come from Winnipeg voted in favour of the design proposed by the Winnipeg firm, and that the minister, who is also from Winnipeg as it happens, decided to award this juicy contract to a consortium, one of whose firms is based in his Winnipeg riding?

Hypothesis: The questioner believes that minister is guilty of cronyism

Cronyism is the practice of partiality in awarding jobs and other advantages to friends or trusted colleagues, especially in politics and between politicians and supportive organizations. The system does not know the word

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, bagaimanakah menteri menjelaskan bahawa satu-satunya ahli juri pakar yang datang dari Winnipeg mengundi menyokong reka bentuk yang dicadangkan oleh firma Winnipeg, dan menteri itu, yang juga dari Winnipeg, memutuskan untuk menganugerahkan kontrak berair ini kepada sebuah konsortium, salah satu firmanya berpangkalan di dalam menunggang Winnipegnya?

Penanya percaya bahawa menteri bersalah kerana kronisme


Premise: "The first board meeting I attended in July he approached me before the meeting started and asked if I had read the -- if I was familiar with the comments that were quoted in the paper. I told him just simply what I had read. "He asked me what I thought about it, and I said, The comments, I don't feel that is appropriate. He asked me if I asked for Mr. Buckingham's resignation on the spot. I told him I didn't think that that was going to happen."

Hypothesis: Mr. Buckingham's resignation was discussed.

The speaker reports that he was asked about Mr. Buckingham's resignation.

"Mesyuarat lembaga pertama yang saya hadiri pada bulan Julai dia mendekati saya sebelum mesyuarat bermula dan bertanya sama ada saya telah membaca -- jika saya biasa dengan komen yang dipetik dalam kertas itu. Saya memberitahunya secara ringkas apa yang saya baca." Dia bertanya kepada saya apa yang saya fikirkan mengenainya, dan saya berkata, Komen itu, saya rasa tidak sesuai. Dia bertanya kepada saya sama ada saya meminta perletakan jawatan Encik Buckingham serta-merta. Saya memberitahunya saya tidak menyangka perkara itu akan berlaku."

Perletakan jawatan Encik Buckingham telah dibincangkan.


Premise: If a bank or an insurance company acts in a fiduciary and responsible manner and must abide by the rules and regulations of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, then surely a crown corporation should be no less concerned about the security of the money it invests.

Hypothesis: Crown corporations are held to laxer standards than banks and insurance companies

It does not say what kinds of standards are imposed on crown corporations. I think the system got it wrong because the context is confusingly worded

Sekiranya bank atau syarikat insurans bertindak secara fidusiari dan bertanggungjawab dan mesti mematuhi peraturan dan peraturan Pejabat Penguasa Institusi Kewangan, maka pastinya perbadanan mahkota tidak kurang mengambil berat tentang keselamatan wang yang dilaburkannya. .

Syarikat Crown dipegang pada piawaian yang lebih longgar daripada bank dan syarikat insurans


Premise: Having 11 directors on the board of management nominated from the private sector by the provinces and territories will ensure that the agency continues to operate in a cost effective and responsive manner as would the other accountability mechanisms built into the legislation before this House.

Hypothesis: there will be no changes in the next year

with the agency continuing to watch to make sure everything is cost effective, you cannot guess if everything will remain the same or if it will change to become more cost effective in the future

Mempunyai 11 pengarah dalam lembaga pengurusan yang dicalonkan daripada sektor swasta oleh wilayah dan wilayah akan memastikan agensi itu terus beroperasi dengan cara yang kos efektif dan responsif seperti mekanisme akauntabiliti lain yang terbina dalam perundangan di hadapan Dewan ini.

tidak akan ada perubahan pada tahun hadapan


Premise: You know the Japanese are breathing down our necks on this. They're moving very rapidly because they know that it is a fast-growing world market. Some of these other countries, particularly in the developing world, their pollution is much worse than anywhere else and their people want higher standards of living.

Hypothesis: Some countries are equal in the amount of pollution they have and the conditions of the lives of the people that live there.

It is not clear if any of the countries have the same amounts of pollution and standards of lives or if they are all either better or worse than the next.

Anda tahu orang Jepun menghembuskan nafas kami tentang perkara ini. Mereka bergerak dengan sangat pantas kerana mereka tahu bahawa ia adalah pasaran dunia yang berkembang pesat. Sebahagian daripada negara-negara lain ini, terutamanya di negara membangun, pencemaran mereka jauh lebih teruk daripada di tempat lain dan rakyat mereka mahukan taraf hidup yang lebih tinggi.

Sesetengah negara adalah sama dalam jumlah pencemaran yang mereka ada dan keadaan kehidupan penduduk yang tinggal di sana.


Premise: Nevertheless, these petitioners, who were opposed to the MAI, call upon parliament to recognize the fact that Canadians reject the MAI approach to globalization and they instruct the government to seek an entirely different kind of agreement by which the world might achieve a rules based global economy which protects workers, the environment and the ability of governments to act in the public interest.

Hypothesis: Canada will forever be known as America's hat.

Canada is known as America's hat in some circles. The system has no way of knowing if this particular term will continue to be used in the future. I'm sure the system is not aware of this nomenclature.

Walau bagaimanapun, pempetisyen ini, yang menentang MAI, menyeru parlimen untuk mengiktiraf hakikat bahawa orang Kanada menolak pendekatan MAI terhadap globalisasi dan mereka mengarahkan kerajaan untuk mendapatkan jenis perjanjian yang sama sekali berbeza di mana dunia mungkin mencapai peraturan berasaskan global. ekonomi yang melindungi pekerja, alam sekitar dan keupayaan kerajaan untuk bertindak demi kepentingan awam.

Kanada akan selamanya dikenali sebagai topi Amerika.


Premise: We allow you -- if you choose to, you don't have to -- but we give you broader competition to allow you to buy into the same health care plan that senators and congressmen give themselves. If it's good enough for us, it's good enough for every American. I believe that your health care is just as important as any politician in Washington, D. C.

Hypothesis: Politicians care about our health care plans

We have no idea if they care - some probably do and some probably don't

Kami membenarkan anda -- jika anda memilih, anda tidak perlu -- tetapi kami memberi anda persaingan yang lebih luas untuk membolehkan anda membeli pelan penjagaan kesihatan yang sama yang diberikan oleh senator dan ahli kongres sendiri. Jika ia cukup baik untuk kita, ia cukup baik untuk setiap orang Amerika. Saya percaya bahawa penjagaan kesihatan anda sama pentingnya dengan mana-mana ahli politik di Washington, D. C.

Ahli politik mengambil berat tentang rancangan penjagaan kesihatan kita


Premise: I hope the Minister of Human Resources Development and her officials will really take note of what I said, will follow up on the issue that I raised and will amend the employment insurance program, so as to meet the needs of workers and, above all, eliminate child poverty in this country.

Hypothesis: The children asked his to say they were at the top of the list.

Though child poverty was above all we do not know if they asked to be at the top of the list therefor the answer is neither.

Saya berharap Menteri Pembangunan Sumber Manusia dan pegawai-pegawainya benar-benar mengambil perhatian apa yang saya katakan, akan membuat susulan terhadap isu yang saya bangkitkan dan akan meminda program insurans pekerjaan, supaya dapat memenuhi keperluan pekerja dan, terutama sekali, menghapuskan kemiskinan kanak-kanak di negara ini.

Kanak-kanak memintanya untuk mengatakan bahawa mereka berada di bahagian atas senarai.


Premise: -- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.

Hypothesis: Justice O'Connor thinks for sure that rewarding existing vested interest is the most plausible explanation.

The context tells us that Justice O'Connor thinks that rewarding existing vested interest is probably the most plausible explanation but does not say for sure.

-- Saya benar-benar fikir ini adalah soalan yang penting dan, seperti yang ditunjukkan oleh Hakim O'Connor, jika kita perlu bertanya apakah penjelasan yang paling munasabah untuk peraturan ini, untuk memberi ganjaran kepada kepentingan peribadi sedia ada atau untuk merangsang bekas karya baru, nampaknya saya bahawa ia mungkin bekas.

Hakim O'Connor berpendapat dengan pasti bahawa kepentingan kepentingan yang sedia ada adalah penjelasan yang paling munasabah.


Premise: Mike Harris has kept his word to Ontarian voters by cutting taxes for working families by 30%, eliminating the huge provincial deficit by next year, creating over 850,000 new jobs and introducing a taxpayer protection act with teeth, all while increasing health care spending and absorbing the huge transfer cuts of this Liberal government.

Hypothesis: Mike Harris helped to create 850, 000 news jobs and helped lots of workers get health care.

The snippet said he increased health care spending. It didn't mention how it affected workers access to health care.

Mike Harris telah menepati janjinya kepada pengundi Ontaria dengan memotong cukai untuk keluarga yang bekerja sebanyak 30%, menghapuskan defisit wilayah yang besar menjelang tahun depan, mewujudkan lebih 850,000 pekerjaan baharu dan memperkenalkan akta perlindungan pembayar cukai dengan gigi, semuanya sambil meningkatkan perbelanjaan penjagaan kesihatan dan menyerap pemotongan pemindahan besar kerajaan Liberal ini.

Mike Harris membantu mencipta 850, 000 pekerjaan berita dan membantu ramai pekerja mendapatkan penjagaan kesihatan.


Premise: It had the opportunity and has already done so many times in the Criminal Code with respect to the environment, but it wants to carry this even a little further with standards, objectives and mostly, the need to honour international agreements or international commitments made by Canada.

Hypothesis: It only wants to change the standards in Canada.

It mentions changing international standards and commitments made by Canada, and would make that it wants to change standards elsewhere. But there is no evidence saying it does want to change them anywhere else and we cannot prove it either way for sure.

Ia mempunyai peluang dan telah melakukannya berkali-kali dalam Kanun Jenayah berkenaan dengan alam sekitar, tetapi ia mahu meneruskannya lebih jauh dengan piawaian, objektif dan kebanyakannya, keperluan untuk menghormati perjanjian antarabangsa atau komitmen antarabangsa yang dibuat oleh Kanada .

Ia hanya mahu mengubah piawaian di Kanada.


Premise: Millions of Canadian families are going to be sitting around their kitchen tables late at night with their pocket calculators, pencils and their reams of paper trying to understand this byzantine, incomprehensible, opaque tax code we have imposed on them because of the innumerable regulations, exemptions, deductions and credits which have been inspired by motions like the one before us today.

Hypothesis: Canadian families will hire a CPA to do their taxes from now on.

The statement says that the canadian tax code is difficult to understand so it's likely they will hire a cpa but the statement doesn't say that.

Berjuta-juta keluarga Kanada akan duduk di sekeliling meja dapur mereka larut malam dengan kalkulator poket, pensel dan rim kertas mereka cuba memahami kod cukai byzantine, tidak dapat difahami, legap yang telah kami kenakan ke atas mereka kerana peraturan, pengecualian yang tidak terkira banyaknya. , potongan dan kredit yang telah diilhamkan oleh usul seperti yang sebelum kita hari ini.

Keluarga Kanada akan mengupah CPA untuk melakukan cukai mereka mulai sekarang.


Premise: As a result of the increased taxes announced on February 13, 1998, excise taxes on cigarettes and tobacco sticks vary from $2.25 to $5.35 for a carton of cigarettes and from $1.85 to $2.93 for a carton of tobacco sticks, depending in which province the tobacco products are offered for sale.

Hypothesis: Tobacco goods have always been taxed

The paragraph does not state for how long taxes have been in effect

Hasil daripada kenaikan cukai yang diumumkan pada 13 Februari 1998, cukai eksais ke atas rokok dan batang tembakau berbeza-beza dari $2.25 hingga $5.35 untuk satu karton rokok dan dari $1.85 hingga $2.93 untuk satu karton batang tembakau, bergantung di wilayah mana produk tembakau ditawarkan untuk dijual.

Barangan tembakau sentiasa dikenakan cukai


Premise: Got four more years, I've got more to do to continue to raise standards, to continue to reward teachers and school districts that are working, to emphasize math and science in the classrooms, to continue to expand Pell Grants to make sure that people have an opportunity to start their career with a college diploma.

Hypothesis: The narrator is will die next year

We do not know if he will die or not, it is impossible to tell

Ada empat tahun lagi, saya perlu melakukan lebih banyak untuk terus meningkatkan standard, untuk terus memberi ganjaran kepada guru dan daerah sekolah yang bekerja, untuk menekankan matematik dan sains di dalam bilik darjah, untuk terus mengembangkan Geran Pell untuk memastikan orang ramai mempunyai peluang untuk memulakan kerjaya mereka dengan diploma kolej.


Premise: Honourable senators, on November 16, the Honourable Jean-Maurice Simard called the attention of the Senate to the current situation vis--vis the development and vitality of francophone and Acadian communities, its gradual deterioration, the growing indifference of governments over the past ten years, and the lack of access to services in French.

Hypothesis: Acadian communities are primarily french-speaking

It doesn't say what language they use. I think the system had difficulty because Acadian and francophone were closely linked in the context

Yang Berhormat senator, pada 16 November, Yang Berhormat Jean-Maurice Simard memanggil perhatian Senat kepada situasi semasa berhubung dengan pembangunan dan daya hidup masyarakat francophone dan Acadian, kemerosotannya secara beransur-ansur, sikap acuh tak acuh yang semakin meningkat dalam tempoh sepuluh yang lalu. tahun, dan kekurangan akses kepada perkhidmatan dalam bahasa Perancis.

Komuniti Acadian terutamanya berbahasa Perancis


Premise: In this case the regional district of Campbell River is serving as the umbrella organization and the overall administration for a variety of community groups which have joined together to submit a comprehensive plan to improve the habitat for chinook, coho and steelhead in the Campbell River area.

Hypothesis: Campbell River is located in Florida.

Nothing in the text specifies what state it's in, or if it's even in the USA, therefore we don't know without using external knowledge. I'm not sure why this was difficult honestly.

Dalam kes ini, daerah serantau Sungai Campbell berfungsi sebagai organisasi payung dan pentadbiran keseluruhan untuk pelbagai kumpulan masyarakat yang telah bergabung untuk mengemukakan pelan komprehensif untuk menambah baik habitat untuk chinook, coho dan steelhead di kawasan Sungai Campbell.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I remind the Leader of the Opposition to go back and read Hansard because I specifically stated that we are continuing to target resources, reducing taxes, paying down public debt and investing in the knowledge of people and safeguarding and improving our health care system.

Hypothesis: The Speaker did not actually speak in this session.

The system does not know the difference between the title of Speaker and the act of someone speaking.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingatkan kepada Ketua Pembangkang supaya kembali membaca Hansard kerana saya secara khusus menyatakan bahawa kita terus menyasarkan sumber, mengurangkan cukai, membayar hutang awam dan melabur dalam pengetahuan orang ramai dan menjaga serta meningkatkan penjagaan kesihatan kita. sistem.

Speaker sebenarnya tidak bercakap dalam sesi ini.


Premise: Senator, the last debate, President Bush said he did not favor a draft. You agreed with him. But our National Guard and Reserve forces are being severely strained because many of them are being held beyond their enlistments. Some of them say that it's a back-door draft.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes there should be a draft.

It is not clear whether the speaker supports or opposes a draft.

Senator, perbahasan terakhir, Presiden Bush berkata beliau tidak memihak kepada draf. Anda bersetuju dengannya. Tetapi pasukan Pengawal Kebangsaan dan Simpanan kita sedang tertekan dengan teruk kerana ramai daripada mereka ditahan di luar pendaftaran mereka. Sesetengah daripada mereka mengatakan bahawa ia adalah draf pintu belakang.


Premise: And at the time when you wrote the original order and you used the words "perceived, saw, and heard," we were concerned, as you well know, with the word "perceived" in terms as to what's the thought process. And there was dialogue on the phone amongst all of us, and you made it very clear that you did not want any testimony that would otherwise relate to biases and prejudices. And, in fact, when you reviewed the notes of the reporters, you had also indicated that your review of Heidi Bubb's notes and the e-mails clearly evidence that there was no bias in the writings, those writings.

Hypothesis: You find "perceived, saw, and heard" to mean physical observation.

The whole discussion was about the ambiguity of "perceived", so it was not at all sure that "you" find them equivalently physical.

Dan pada masa anda menulis susunan asal dan anda menggunakan perkataan "perceived, saw, and heard," kami bimbang, seperti yang anda sedia maklum, dengan perkataan "perceived" dari segi apa proses pemikiran. Dan terdapat dialog di telefon di kalangan kami semua, dan anda menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa anda tidak mahu sebarang keterangan yang sebaliknya akan berkaitan dengan berat sebelah dan prasangka. Dan, sebenarnya, apabila anda menyemak nota wartawan, anda juga telah menunjukkan bahawa semakan anda terhadap nota Heidi Bubb dan e-mel jelas membuktikan bahawa tidak ada berat sebelah dalam tulisan, tulisan itu.

Anda dapati "dilihat, dilihat dan didengar" bermaksud pemerhatian fizikal.


Premise: And after she had spoken, Bertha Spahr also spoke, as well. She's the department chairperson, and, actually, I had her as a science teacher. And she presented information to the board, documents, that she and I believe other members of the science department had researched on, I guess cases that had been set down before on creationism in the public school system or something of that nature, just to show them that, you know, if they were still considering this idea, that they might, I don't know, be met with some litigation or something.

Hypothesis: Bertha Spahr has talked to ash

Dan selepas dia bercakap, Bertha Spahr juga bercakap. Dia pengerusi jabatan, dan, sebenarnya, saya mempunyai dia sebagai guru sains. Dan dia membentangkan maklumat kepada lembaga, dokumen, yang dia dan saya percaya ahli jabatan sains yang lain telah meneliti, saya rasa kes-kes yang telah ditetapkan sebelum ini mengenai penciptaan dalam sistem sekolah awam atau sesuatu yang bersifat sedemikian, hanya untuk menunjukkan mereka yang, anda tahu, jika mereka masih mempertimbangkan idea ini, bahawa mereka mungkin, saya tidak tahu, akan menghadapi beberapa litigasi atau sesuatu.


Premise: Well, and then what happened was, we had a conference call, Eric, Pat, several others in Pat's office and myself and Terry. They indicated that they would not. And then in the course of that conversation, the defendants counsel had stated, for example, we would like the opportunity to ask if they heard Mr. So and So say something, why didn't they write that. That's what I'm concerned about with respect to --

Hypothesis: pat never passed grade 4

it does not state pats level of education, therefore it is impossible to know if he passed grade 4 or not

Nah, dan kemudian apa yang berlaku ialah, kami mengadakan panggilan persidangan, Eric, Pat, beberapa orang lain di pejabat Pat dan saya dan Terry. Mereka menunjukkan bahawa mereka tidak akan. Dan kemudian semasa perbualan itu, peguam defendan telah menyatakan, sebagai contoh, kami ingin peluang untuk bertanya sama ada mereka mendengar Encik Fulan berkata sesuatu, mengapa mereka tidak menulis itu. Itulah yang saya bimbang berkenaan dengan --


Premise: So I would like to ask him how he could expect me as a member on this side of the House who is most interested in getting to the root of government documents, in getting to examine the way government functions and indeed who has had legislation before this House that would enable members to better do their job in this regard, to take this motion seriously when his party has deliberately blocked the very kind of legislation that we need in this House to enable backbenchers and opposition members to assess how government operates?

Hypothesis: I was a member of the senate.

I believe that we don't know exactly what the person is job wise.

Jadi saya ingin bertanya kepadanya bagaimana dia boleh mengharapkan saya sebagai ahli di sebelah Dewan ini yang paling berminat untuk mendapatkan ke akar umbi dokumen kerajaan, untuk meneliti cara kerajaan berfungsi dan sememangnya yang mempunyai undang-undang sebelum ini Dewan yang akan membolehkan ahli-ahli menjalankan tugas mereka dengan lebih baik dalam hal ini, untuk mengambil serius usul ini apabila partinya sengaja menyekat undang-undang yang kita perlukan dalam Dewan ini untuk membolehkan ahli parlimen dan ahli pembangkang menilai bagaimana kerajaan beroperasi?


Premise: He been a senator for 20 years. He voted to increase taxes 98 times. When they tried to reduce taxes, he voted against that 127 times. He talks about being a fiscal conservative, or fiscally sound, but he voted over -- he voted 277 times to waive the budget caps, which would have cost the taxpayers $4. 2 trillion.

Hypothesis: a compulsory contributions to state revenue are not a big problem in the united states

i used the definition of taxes to confuse the system, and what i wrote is an opinion therefore it is not correct or incorrect

Dia menjadi senator selama 20 tahun. Beliau mengundi untuk menaikkan cukai sebanyak 98 kali ganda. Apabila mereka cuba mengurangkan cukai, dia mengundi menentangnya sebanyak 127 kali. Dia bercakap tentang menjadi konservatif fiskal, atau fiskal yang kukuh, tetapi dia mengundi -- dia mengundi 277 kali untuk mengetepikan had belanjawan, yang akan menyebabkan pembayar cukai $4. 2 trilion.

caruman wajib kepada hasil negeri bukanlah satu masalah besar di Amerika Syarikat


Premise: More sometimes than people in foreign countries. And we need to do something about that. Not with the measure that leaves the majority of them without any real basic help until the next president's term of four years is over. But right away. And that means doing it under the Medicare program.

Hypothesis: People are sometimes in more foreign countries. Something that we need to do about that is not leaving them with the measure that the majority of them are without any basic real help until the term of the following president of 4 years is over, right away, under the Medicare program.

I think it fits, it vague enough to fool the model.

Lebih kadang-kadang daripada orang di negara asing. Dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang itu. Bukan dengan langkah yang menyebabkan majoriti mereka tanpa bantuan asas sebenar sehingga tempoh empat tahun presiden akan datang berakhir. Tetapi dengan segera. Dan ini bermakna melakukannya di bawah program Medicare.

Orang kadang-kadang berada di lebih banyak negara asing. Sesuatu yang perlu kita lakukan mengenai perkara itu ialah tidak membiarkan mereka dengan ukuran bahawa majoriti daripada mereka tidak mempunyai sebarang bantuan sebenar asas sehingga tempoh presiden berikutnya selama 4 tahun tamat, serta-merta, di bawah program Medicare.


Premise: As for the banking purpose of the proposal, society's interest in solving crimes by extending the pool of contributors to the DNA bank to include all persons arrested or charged with a designated offence, does not sufficiently outweigh "the intrusive nature of bodily sample seizures."

Hypothesis: People want to contribute to a DNA bank

This isn't true or false. Some people do, some people don't. It's controversial

Bagi tujuan perbankan cadangan itu, kepentingan masyarakat dalam menyelesaikan jenayah dengan memperluaskan kumpulan penyumbang kepada bank DNA untuk memasukkan semua orang yang ditangkap atau didakwa dengan kesalahan yang ditetapkan, tidak cukup mengatasi "sifat penyitaan sampel badan yang mengganggu."

Orang ramai mahu menyumbang kepada bank DNA


Premise: The Bloc Quebecois believes that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal, a more significant support for this international court, which is playing a fundamental role with regards to the aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Hypothesis: The Bloc Quebecois supports Bosnia

The paragram does not mention whether The Bloc Quebecois supports Bosnia.

Blok Quebecois percaya bahawa pembaharuan mandat SFOR di Bosnia-Hercegovina harus disertai dengan peningkatan sokongan untuk Tribunal Jenayah Antarabangsa, sokongan yang lebih penting untuk mahkamah antarabangsa ini, yang memainkan peranan asas berkaitan dengan akibat konflik di Bosnia-Hercegovina.


Premise: We're just in a period -- we've got to work to bring it -- my opponent keeps mentioning John McCain, and I'm glad he did. John McCain is for me for president because he understands I have the right view in winning the war on terror and that my plan will succeed in Iraq. And my opponent has got a plan of retreat and defeat in Iraq.

Hypothesis: His opponent is running for president

Kami hanya dalam tempoh -- kami perlu berusaha untuk membawanya -- lawan saya terus menyebut John McCain, dan saya gembira dia melakukannya. John McCain adalah untuk saya sebagai presiden kerana dia faham saya mempunyai pandangan yang betul dalam memenangi perang melawan keganasan dan rancangan saya akan berjaya di Iraq. Dan lawan saya telah mendapat rancangan berundur dan kalah di Iraq.


Premise: I will be pleased to associate with my colleague from Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, as I have in other circumstances, moreover, in offering some views, some enlightenment arising out of my training as a professor of international and constitutional law, as someone who has spent a number of years in a university teaching about legislation such as this Citizenship Act. Someone who wants to take a constructive look at improving this legislation, clarifying some of its provisions, making that contribution for the most part within a parliamentary committee, which will examine it clause by clause.

Hypothesis: The agent is from Hochelaga-Maisonneuve.

It states their colleague is from there, not where they are from.

Saya berbesar hati untuk bergaul dengan rakan sekerja saya dari Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, seperti yang saya lakukan dalam keadaan lain, lebih-lebih lagi, dalam menawarkan beberapa pandangan, beberapa pencerahan yang timbul daripada latihan saya sebagai seorang profesor undang-undang antarabangsa dan perlembagaan, sebagai seseorang yang telah menghabiskan bilangan tahun di universiti mengajar tentang perundangan seperti Akta Kewarganegaraan ini. Seseorang yang ingin melihat secara konstruktif untuk menambah baik perundangan ini, menjelaskan beberapa peruntukannya, membuat sumbangan itu sebahagian besarnya dalam jawatankuasa parlimen, yang akan menelitinya fasal demi fasal.


Premise: On the other hand, a couple of days ago the member who sits opposite, the member who is running off at the mouth over there, during a very emotional vote in this House was crying her eyes out simply because her party and her leader had threatened her and coerced her into voting the party line.

Hypothesis: The member knew what to do when coerced.

I think the person had a dilemma on what to do and that is why they were so emotional. I think the system didn't understand that.

Sebaliknya, beberapa hari lalu ahli yang duduk bertentangan, ahli yang lari mulut di sana, semasa pengundian yang sangat emosional di Dewan ini menangis kerana partinya dan ketuanya telah mengancam dia dan memaksanya untuk mengundi barisan parti.

Ahli itu tahu apa yang perlu dilakukan apabila dipaksa.


Premise: Madam Speaker, I would like to start by congratulating the hon. member for Rosemont for this initiative and for the role he has played in encouraging the federal government and the Minister of Health to take steps to allow the legal use of marijuana for health and medical purposes.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Health wants marijuana legalized.

It said he was encouraged, it didn't say if he wanted it.  That is what made it hard.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya mulakan dengan mengucapkan tahniah kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Rosemont untuk inisiatif ini dan untuk peranan yang telah dimainkannya dalam menggalakkan kerajaan persekutuan dan Menteri Kesihatan mengambil langkah untuk membenarkan penggunaan ganja secara sah untuk tujuan kesihatan dan perubatan.

Menteri Kesihatan mahu ganja dihalalkan.


Premise: The use of the military, there -- some people are now suggesting that if you don't want to use the military to maintain the peace, to do the civil thing, is it time to consider a civil force of some kind that comes in after the military that builds nations or all of that? Is that on your radar screen?

Hypothesis: You can't be a minor in the military

While this is true, it's neither correct nor incorrect given the context

Penggunaan tentera, di sana -- sesetengah orang kini mencadangkan bahawa jika anda tidak mahu menggunakan tentera untuk mengekalkan keamanan, untuk melakukan perkara sivil, adakah sudah tiba masanya untuk mempertimbangkan beberapa jenis pasukan awam yang datang selepas tentera yang membina negara atau semua itu? Adakah itu pada skrin radar anda?

Anda tidak boleh menjadi bawah umur dalam tentera


Premise: It's one of my top priorities, Jim, to give every single child in the United States affordable health care within the next four years. I would like to see eventually in this country some form of universal health care, but I'm not for a government-run system.

Hypothesis: Within the next 4 years, every single child in the US will have access to affordable health care.

This is one of the priorities of the person who is speaking, but we do not know if this wish will come to fruition or not. Therefore this statement could be correct or it could be incorrect.

Ia adalah salah satu keutamaan saya, Jim, untuk memberikan setiap kanak-kanak di Amerika Syarikat penjagaan kesihatan yang mampu dimiliki dalam tempoh empat tahun akan datang. Saya ingin melihat akhirnya di negara ini beberapa bentuk penjagaan kesihatan sejagat, tetapi saya bukan untuk sistem yang dikendalikan oleh kerajaan.

Dalam tempoh 4 tahun akan datang, setiap kanak-kanak di AS akan mendapat akses kepada penjagaan kesihatan yang mampu dimiliki.


Premise: It has gone through all the stages of the democratic system in Canada and Quebec, and you can be sure that not a single Bloc Quebecois member of Parliament will oppose the proper workings of democracy in this country called Canada, and in the emerging country which will be called Quebec.

Hypothesis: As of 2019, the Bloc Quebecois party no longer exists.

Nothing in the text mentions when this statement was said, or mentions 2019 at all, so we don't know for sure without using external knowledge. It's difficult because the system has trouble dealing with statements talking about existence.

Ia telah melalui semua peringkat sistem demokrasi di Kanada dan Quebec, dan anda boleh yakin bahawa tidak seorang pun ahli Parlimen Bloc Quebecois akan menentang cara demokrasi yang betul di negara ini yang dipanggil Kanada, dan di negara baru muncul yang akan dipanggil Quebec.

Sehingga 2019, parti Bloc Quebecois tidak lagi wujud.


Premise: Now right here in Arizona, that difference would have been $131 million to the state of Arizona to help its kids be able to have better education and to lift the property tax burden from its citizens. The president reneged on his promise to fund No Child Left Behind.

Hypothesis: The president supports all children

The president believes all children deserve nothing

Sekarang, di Arizona, perbezaan itu ialah $131 juta kepada negeri Arizona untuk membantu anak-anaknya mendapat pendidikan yang lebih baik dan mengurangkan beban cukai harta daripada warganya. Presiden mengingkari janjinya untuk membiayai No Child Left Behind.


Premise: If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us. If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us. And it's -- our nation stands alone right now in the world in terms of power, and that's why we have to be humble. And yet project strength in a way that promotes freedom.

Hypothesis: Our nation stands alone right now in the world in terms of firepower.

The writer says "our nation stands alone right now in the world in terms of power" but does not define what type of power. The model was fooled by the subtle change.

Jika kita bangsa yang sombong, mereka akan marah kita. Jika kita bangsa yang rendah hati, tetapi kuat, mereka akan menyambut kita. Dan ia -- negara kita berdiri sendiri sekarang di dunia dari segi kuasa, dan itulah sebabnya kita perlu merendah diri. Namun mengunjurkan kekuatan dengan cara yang menggalakkan kebebasan.

Negara kita berdiri sendiri sekarang di dunia dari segi kuasa api.


Premise: I am sure I speak on behalf of all hon. members in also congratulating the parliamentary secretary who has done such a fantastic job of piloting the bill through the House and in committee in the face of the filibuster put up almost exclusively by the Reform Party, which does not want to see labour legislation advance in parliament.

Hypothesis: Parliamentary secretary is part of the reform party.

The parliamentary secretary is probably not part of the reform party but do not know that for sure.

Saya pasti saya bercakap bagi pihak hon semua. ahli-ahli juga mengucapkan tahniah kepada setiausaha parlimen yang telah melakukan kerja yang hebat untuk merintis rang undang-undang melalui Dewan dan dalam jawatankuasa dalam menghadapi filibuster yang ditubuhkan hampir secara eksklusif oleh Parti Reformasi, yang tidak mahu melihat undang-undang buruh maju di parlimen .

Setiausaha Parlimen adalah sebahagian daripada parti reformasi.


Premise: I want to reduce the size of the classrooms in this country. For one basic reason, so that students can get more one-on-one time with teachers. And the way to do that is first to recruit more teachers. I've a plan in my budget to recruit 100,000 new, highly qualified teachers and to help local school districts build new schools.

Hypothesis: Increased one-on-one time with teachers is beneficial for students.

Saya mahu mengecilkan saiz bilik darjah di negara ini. Atas satu sebab asas, supaya pelajar boleh mendapatkan lebih banyak masa satu lawan satu dengan guru. Dan cara untuk melakukannya ialah dengan mengambil lebih ramai guru. Saya mempunyai rancangan dalam belanjawan saya untuk mengambil 100,000 guru baharu yang berkelayakan tinggi dan membantu daerah sekolah tempatan membina sekolah baharu.

Peningkatan satu-satu masa dengan guru memberi manfaat kepada pelajar.


Premise: One of the things I've done in Texas is I've been able to put together a good team of people. I've been able to set clear goals. The goals ought to be an education system that leaves no child behind, Medicare for our seniors, a Social Security system that's safe and secure, foreign policy that's in our nation's interest, and a strong military, and then bring people together to achieve those goals.

Hypothesis: the foreign policy is unchanged

it does not say whether or not the foreign policy was ever changed. I think the model got confused since it mentions a want for change but not if it happened before or not.

Salah satu perkara yang saya lakukan di Texas ialah saya dapat mengumpulkan sekumpulan orang yang baik. Saya telah dapat menetapkan matlamat yang jelas. Matlamatnya mestilah sistem pendidikan yang tidak meninggalkan kanak-kanak, Medicare untuk warga emas kita, sistem Keselamatan Sosial yang selamat dan terjamin, dasar luar yang demi kepentingan negara kita, dan tentera yang kuat, dan kemudian membawa orang ramai untuk mencapai matlamat tersebut .


Premise: I am pleased to speak on this motion today, particularly since I drafted it two years ago as a result of some unfortunate circumstances in my home province of Saskatchewan but which could continue to have some importance as efforts to discover the extent of government's involvement in the APEC issue unfold.

Hypothesis: APEC is a local organization.

It doesn't seem clear to me what kind of organization it is, or even what it is at all really, so I don't think we know for sure. I guess it's difficult because it says the government is involved in the issue, so the system might think it's some type of federal or national organization.

Saya berbesar hati untuk bercakap mengenai usul ini hari ini, terutamanya sejak saya merangkanya dua tahun lalu akibat daripada beberapa keadaan malang di wilayah asal saya di Saskatchewan tetapi yang boleh terus mempunyai kepentingan sebagai usaha untuk mengetahui sejauh mana penglibatan kerajaan dalam Isu APEC terbongkar.


Premise: I agree, and this Court has -- we're not just talking about the judgment of the Congress of the -- the 105th Congress in 1998. This is the way the Statute of Anne was written. This is the way the State copyright laws were written when this country became a Nation. This is the way the 1790 copyright statute, the number of --

Hypothesis: This was written by a judge

Saya bersetuju, dan Mahkamah ini telah -- kita bukan hanya bercakap tentang penghakiman Kongres -- Kongres ke-105 pada tahun 1998. Ini adalah cara Statut Anne ditulis. Ini adalah cara undang-undang hak cipta Negeri ditulis apabila negara ini menjadi sebuah Negara. Ini adalah cara statut hak cipta 1790, bilangan --


Premise: Why wouldn't it? If the equity argument under the Necessary and Proper Clause justifies extension of the copyright for those whose copyright will expire tomorrow if it's not extended, in order to put them on parity with those getting copyrights for new works, why doesn't it apply to the copyright, the holder of the copyright that expired yesterday?

Hypothesis: The writer has a copyright that is going to expire.

The writer is arguing about expired copyrights, but never says he has a copyright. The model just assumed it.

Mengapa tidak? Jika hujah ekuiti di bawah Klausa Perlu dan Wajar membenarkan pelanjutan hak cipta bagi mereka yang hak ciptanya akan tamat tempoh esok jika ia tidak dilanjutkan, untuk meletakkan mereka setara dengan mereka yang mendapat hak cipta untuk karya baharu, mengapakah ia tidak terpakai kepada hak cipta, pemegang hak cipta yang telah tamat tempoh semalam?


Premise: Of course, and that again -- no, I think that that was ill-considered. I did support it at the time. It was in the previous administration, in the Bush-Quayle administration, and I think in retrospect the lessons there are ones that we should take very, very seriously.

Hypothesis: Bush-Quayle administration showed good judgement.

The Bush-Quayle had the person support at the time but the person seem to change there mind after. Therefore could have been perceived as good judgment at the time (correct) but the person had some retrospective thought and thought that maybe it might not have been a good idea making the judgement(incorrect) Therefore it just a matter of perception whether that statement as correct or incorrect

Sudah tentu, dan itu sekali lagi -- tidak, saya fikir itu tidak dipertimbangkan. Saya memang menyokongnya pada masa itu. Ia adalah dalam pentadbiran sebelum ini, dalam pentadbiran Bush-Quayle, dan saya fikir jika difikirkan semula, terdapat pengajaran yang perlu kita ambil dengan sangat, sangat serius.

Pentadbiran Bush-Quayle menunjukkan pertimbangan yang baik.


Premise: I submit, Justice Souter, that there's no per se limitation, that if there is, as Justice Scalia suggested, for -- if it is true that Congress,having specified 14 years or 28 years, decides that doesn't work very well because of the economies of other countries, the parade of constraints on artists in other countries, the reasons that we want things to be preserved or distributed, it should be 2 more years, or 5 more years later --

Hypothesis: Justice Souter has ruled over a case involving castiel

Saya mengemukakan, Justice Souter, bahawa tidak ada had per se, bahawa jika ada, seperti yang dicadangkan oleh Justice Scalia, kerana -- jika benar bahawa Kongres, setelah menetapkan 14 tahun atau 28 tahun, memutuskan itu tidak berfungsi dengan baik kerana ekonomi negara lain, perarakan kekangan artis di negara lain, sebab kita mahu perkara itu dipelihara atau diedarkan, sepatutnya 2 tahun lagi, atau 5 tahun lagi --

Justice Souter telah memutuskan kes yang melibatkan castiel


Premise: In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.

Hypothesis: There was never a comprehensive plan to secure America

It doesn't state if their was a plan to secure America

Dalam erti kata lain, untuk memastikan kami selamat, mesti ada rancangan yang komprehensif. Lawan saya hanya hujung minggu ini bercakap tentang bagaimana keganasan boleh dikurangkan kepada gangguan, membandingkannya dengan pelacuran, perjudian haram. Saya fikir sikap dan pandangan itu berbahaya. Saya tidak fikir anda boleh mengamankan Amerika untuk jangka masa panjang jika anda tidak mempunyai pandangan yang komprehensif tentang bagaimana untuk mengalahkan orang-orang ini.

Tidak pernah ada rancangan komprehensif untuk mengamankan Amerika


Premise: Yes, I think it is. Absolutely. I don't think he would have fallen had we not used the force. And I know there are some in our party that disagree with that sentiment. I supported the president. I thought he made the right decision to do so. I didn't think he necessarily made the right decision to take land troops off the table right before we committed ourselves offensively, but nevertheless, it worked.

Hypothesis: They support george bush

Ya, saya fikir ia adalah. betul-betul. Saya tidak fikir dia akan jatuh jika kita tidak menggunakan kekerasan. Dan saya tahu ada dalam parti kita yang tidak bersetuju dengan sentimen itu. Saya menyokong presiden. Saya fikir dia membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk berbuat demikian. Saya tidak fikir dia semestinya membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk mengeluarkan tentera darat dari meja sebelum kami melakukan serangan, tetapi bagaimanapun, ia berjaya.


Premise: The administration deserves credit for having made it work. It is important for NATO to have it work. It's important for NATO to be strong and confident and to help keep the peace in Europe. And one of the reasons I felt so strongly that the United States needed to participate was because of our relations with NATO, and NATO is going to be an important part of keeping the peace in the future.

Hypothesis: NATO will probably not keep the peace with the world

this statement fits the category because it is neither true or untrue it is an unknown, therefore confuses the AI

Pentadbiran patut dipuji kerana telah berjaya. Adalah penting untuk NATO memastikan ia berfungsi. Adalah penting bagi NATO untuk menjadi kuat dan yakin serta membantu menjaga keamanan di Eropah. Dan salah satu sebab yang saya rasa sangat kuat bahawa Amerika Syarikat perlu mengambil bahagian adalah kerana hubungan kita dengan NATO, dan NATO akan menjadi bahagian penting dalam menjaga keamanan pada masa hadapan.

NATO mungkin tidak akan menjaga keamanan dengan dunia


Premise: During the years between World War I and World War II, a great lesson was learned by our military leaders and the people of the United States. The lesson was that in the aftermath of World War I, we kind of turned our backs and left them to their own devices and they brewed up a lot of trouble that quickly became World War II.

Hypothesis: World War II was not far after World War I ended.

World War II did occur after World War I, however the term "not far after" is an opinion and has no concrete fact to it.

Sepanjang tahun-tahun antara Perang Dunia I dan Perang Dunia II, satu pengajaran besar telah dipelajari oleh pemimpin tentera kita dan rakyat Amerika Syarikat. Pengajarannya ialah selepas Perang Dunia I, kami berpaling tadah dan meninggalkan mereka sendiri dan mereka menimbulkan banyak masalah yang dengan cepat menjadi Perang Dunia II.

Perang Dunia II tidak lama selepas Perang Dunia I berakhir.


Premise: It is simply evaluating what the term should be prospectively in a way that we presume this Court should presume is legitimate under the First Amendment. When it legislates retrospectively, it is, in effect, looking at particular authors and estates of authors who are before Congress asking for this extension, and it's choosing between these particular authors and the public at large.

Hypothesis: The estates of the authors being referred to are those who died from natural illnesses only.

We do not know how the authors who dies and left estates became dead - it could be natural illnesses, or other causes, we do not know from the context so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Ia hanya menilai istilah itu secara prospektif dengan cara yang kami anggap Mahkamah ini sah di bawah Pindaan Pertama. Apabila ia menggubal undang-undang secara retrospektif, ia, sebenarnya, melihat pengarang dan estet pengarang tertentu yang sebelum Kongres meminta sambungan ini, dan ia memilih antara pengarang tertentu ini dan orang awam secara amnya.

Harta pusaka pengarang yang dirujuk adalah mereka yang meninggal dunia akibat penyakit semulajadi sahaja.


Premise: That the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications have power to sit at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday December 9, 1997, for its study of Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act (maritime liability), even though the Senate may then be sitting and that rule 95(4) be suspended in relation thereto.

In the context it does not state what the "That the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications " does on a monday evening                                                                                so the Statement  "That the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications meet up every monday evening to play bingo" is neither Definitely Correct nor Den

Bahawa Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat Pengangkutan dan Komunikasi mempunyai kuasa untuk bersidang pada pukul 4:00 petang. pada hari Selasa 9 Disember 1997, untuk kajiannya terhadap Rang Undang-Undang S-4, Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Perkapalan Kanada (liabiliti maritim), walaupun Senat mungkin bersidang dan peraturan 95(4) itu digantung berhubung dengannya.

Bahawa Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat Pengangkutan dan Komunikasi bertemu setiap petang Isnin untuk bermain bingo


Premise: I do. I do think this, though. When it comes to timetables it can't be the United States timetable as to how discussions take place. It's got to be a timetable that all parties can agree to, like the Palestinians and Israelis. Secondly, any lasting peace is going to have to be a peace that's good for both sides. And therefore, the term honest broker makes sense. This current administration's worked hard to keep the parties at the table. I will try to do the same thing. But it won't be on my timetable, it will be on the timetable that people are comfortable with in the Middle East.

Hypothesis: Lasting peace in the middle east will not be based on any timetable that the US will agree to.

The US may agree to the timetable, but they will not be dictating it.

Saya sudi. Saya fikir ini, walaupun. Mengenai jadual waktu, ia tidak boleh menjadi jadual waktu Amerika Syarikat tentang cara perbincangan berlaku. Ia mesti menjadi jadual waktu yang semua pihak boleh bersetuju, seperti Palestin dan Israel. Kedua, sebarang keamanan yang berkekalan mestilah keamanan yang baik untuk kedua-dua belah pihak. Oleh itu, istilah broker jujur masuk akal. Pentadbiran semasa ini bekerja keras untuk mengekalkan parti-parti di meja. Saya akan cuba melakukan perkara yang sama. Tetapi ia tidak akan berada pada jadual saya, ia akan mengikut jadual yang orang ramai selesa dengan di Timur Tengah.

Keamanan berkekalan di timur tengah tidak akan berdasarkan sebarang jadual waktu yang akan dipersetujui oleh AS.


Premise: Well, I think the fact that they're facing these repeated call-ups, some of them two and three deployments, and there's a stop- loss policy that prevents people from being able to get out when their time was up, is a reflection of the bad judgment this president exercised in how he has engaged in the world and deployed our forces.

Hypothesis: Obama is the president whose decision is being critisized

Nah, saya fikir hakikat bahawa mereka menghadapi panggilan berulang ini, beberapa daripadanya dua dan tiga penempatan, dan terdapat dasar stop-loss yang menghalang orang daripada dapat keluar apabila masa mereka tamat, adalah satu refleksi penilaian buruk yang dilakukan oleh presiden ini dalam cara dia terlibat dalam dunia dan mengerahkan pasukan kita.

Obama adalah presiden yang keputusannya dikritik


Premise: One feature of the summary trial reform that was discussed at length in committee was the requirement to provide commanding officers with more comprehensive training in their military justice duties and responsibilities and to have them certified as qualified to conduct summary trials.

Hypothesis: The committee wants to postpone trial reform.

I made an assumption. This is what also made it difficult.

Satu ciri pembaharuan perbicaraan ringkasan yang telah dibincangkan dengan panjang lebar dalam jawatankuasa adalah keperluan untuk menyediakan pegawai pemerintah dengan latihan yang lebih komprehensif dalam tugas dan tanggungjawab keadilan tentera mereka dan supaya mereka diperakui sebagai layak untuk menjalankan perbicaraan ringkasan.

Jawatankuasa itu mahu menangguhkan pembaharuan percubaan.


Premise: On face value, based upon the debate thus far, we have on the record of this house an observation that perhaps the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada has said that Madam Justice Arbour has adopted a certain position or a view with reference to this legislation.

Hypothesis: Madam Justice Arbour has no emotions.

Pada nilai muka, berdasarkan perbahasan setakat ini, kami mempunyai dalam rekod dewan ini pemerhatian bahawa mungkin Menteri Kehakiman dan Peguam Negara Kanada telah mengatakan bahawa Puan Justice Arbor telah menerima pakai pendirian atau pandangan tertentu dengan merujuk kepada perundangan ini.

Puan Justice Arbor tidak mempunyai emosi.


Premise: We are as deeply concerned as most Canadians about the enormous, largely unchecked power of the Prime Minister through governor in council appointments to name political friends of the government to sensitive positions throughout the entire public service, agencies, crown corporations and the like.

Hypothesis: The prime minister visited disneyland

This statement has no reference to disneyland whatsoever, therefore it is unknown whether the Prime Minister went to disneyland.

Kami sangat prihatin seperti kebanyakan rakyat Kanada tentang kuasa besar Perdana Menteri yang tidak terkawal melalui pelantikan gabenor dalam majlis untuk menamakan rakan politik kerajaan kepada jawatan sensitif di seluruh perkhidmatan awam, agensi, syarikat mahkota dan seumpamanya.


Premise: Jim, I hope that we can come back to the subject of education because the governor made an extensive statement on it and I have a very different view than the one he expressed. But that having been said, I believe that -- well, first of all, let me say that the governor and I agree on some things where this subject is concerned.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a woman

We do not know the gender of the speaker

Jim, saya harap kita boleh kembali kepada subjek pendidikan kerana gabenor membuat kenyataan yang luas mengenainya dan saya mempunyai pandangan yang sangat berbeza daripada yang beliau nyatakan. Tetapi setelah diperkatakan, saya percaya bahawa -- baik, pertama sekali, izinkan saya mengatakan bahawa gabenor dan saya bersetuju dengan beberapa perkara yang berkaitan dengan perkara ini.


Premise: Whether you are Liberals, independents or Progressive Conservatives, in the name of justice, impartiality and our future as a society, please ask cabinet to delay or retract its decision, so that it can at least hear the TransMaritime Pipelines proposal, and please agree to consider in committee the process that led to a decision that is so arbitrary and so destructive for the country.

Hypothesis: The narrator is asking U.S citizens

The narrator doesn't clearly say who they are asking.

Sama ada anda Liberal, bebas atau Konservatif Progresif, atas nama keadilan, kesaksamaan dan masa depan kita sebagai masyarakat, sila minta kabinet menangguhkan atau menarik balik keputusannya, supaya sekurang-kurangnya ia dapat mendengar cadangan TransMaritime Pipelines, dan sila bersetuju untuk pertimbangkan dalam jawatankuasa proses yang membawa kepada keputusan yang sewenang-wenangnya dan sangat merosakkan negara.

Pencerita sedang bertanya kepada warga A.S


Premise: We want people to know very clearly that the Bloc Quebecois and the Parti Quebecois want to hold a referendum, whereas two thirds of Quebeckers are opposed, because they know that a referendum is bad for economic growth and employment, and means less revenue to put towards health and education.

Hypothesis: A referendum would stop economic growth

The context says a referendum would be bad for growth, but doesn't say it could stop. Growth could go from 5% to 1% for example, but it would still be growth. The system likely thought bad for growth was the same as no growth

Kami mahu orang ramai mengetahui dengan jelas bahawa Bloc Quebecois dan Parti Quebecois mahu mengadakan referendum, manakala dua pertiga daripada Quebeckers menentang, kerana mereka tahu bahawa referendum tidak baik untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pekerjaan, dan bermakna kurang hasil untuk digunakan. kesihatan dan pendidikan.

Referendum akan menghentikan pertumbuhan ekonomi


Premise: Mr. Speaker, the 70 million Canadian dollars now available in Quebec for millennium scholarships over a ten-year period are intended to benefit students from Quebec, particularly those in the greatest need and, combined with the financial assistance they are already receiving, reduce their level of indebtedness significantly.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker is blind.

It is not mentioned whether Mr. Speaker can see but the system assumes this is incorrect.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, 70 juta dolar Kanada yang kini tersedia di Quebec untuk biasiswa milenium dalam tempoh sepuluh tahun bertujuan untuk memberi manfaat kepada pelajar dari Quebec, terutamanya mereka yang paling memerlukan dan, digabungkan dengan bantuan kewangan yang telah mereka terima, mengurangkan mereka. tahap keberhutangan dengan ketara.


Premise: Because, if I understand correctly what has just happened, my hon. colleague for Lvis had the floor on a point of order and, during his point of order, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons rose on a point of order, and you recognized him.

Hypothesis: The person whose point of view we're getting in the context seldom uses the term "hon." to describe people.

We have no way of knowing how often this person uses the term, so the statement is neither correct nor incorrect.

Sebab, kalau saya faham betul-betul apa yang baru berlaku, my hon. Rakan sekerja untuk Lvis mempunyai alasan mengenai satu perintah dan, semasa perintahnya, Setiausaha Parlimen kepada Pemimpin Kerajaan di Dewan Rakyat bangkit atas satu titik perintah, dan anda mengenalinya.

Orang yang pandangannya kita perolehi dalam konteks jarang menggunakan istilah "hon." untuk menggambarkan orang.


Premise: New question to you, Senator Kerry, two minutes. And it's still on jobs. You know, many experts say that a president really doesn't have much control over jobs. For example, if someone invents a machine that does the work of five people, that's progress. That's not the president's fault.

Hypothesis: The senator was reprimanded for talking too long.

The speaker gives Senator Kerry two minutes to answer, so it's possible Kerry took longer than two minutes and was punished for it, or maybe he stayed within the time limit.

Soalan baru kepada anda, Senator Kerry, dua minit. Dan ia masih dalam kerja. Anda tahu, ramai pakar mengatakan bahawa seorang presiden benar-benar tidak mempunyai banyak kawalan ke atas pekerjaan. Sebagai contoh, jika seseorang mencipta mesin yang melakukan kerja lima orang, itu kemajuan. Itu bukan salah presiden.

Senator itu ditegur kerana bercakap terlalu panjang.