Premise: No. That's too amorphous a question. The issue here, I'll restate, is the veracity of the articles themselves, did the reporter hear the statement as reported. If it was taken out of context, we're not going to delve into that in this examination. The individual who believes -- who was quoted and believes the statement was taken out of context or flatly that he didn't or she didn't say it and it's inaccurate will have the opportunity to say that during the defendants case-in-chief or at any other time during the trial.

Hypothesis: They will delve into that statement at another examination

"we're not going to delve into that in this examination." was what I based my statement off of. What I wrote can't be known at this point in time so it should be marked as neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect

Tidak. Itu soalan yang terlalu amorf. Isu di sini, saya akan nyatakan semula, adalah kebenaran artikel itu sendiri, adakah wartawan mendengar kenyataan seperti yang dilaporkan. Jika ia diambil di luar konteks, kita tidak akan menyelidikinya dalam peperiksaan ini. Individu yang percaya -- yang dipetik dan percaya kenyataan itu diambil di luar konteks atau secara terang-terangan bahawa dia tidak atau dia tidak mengatakannya dan ia tidak tepat akan berpeluang untuk mengatakan bahawa semasa ketua kes defendan atau pada bila-bila masa lain semasa perbicaraan.

Mereka akan menyelidiki kenyataan itu pada peperiksaan lain


Premise: I too am very pleased to hear about the Bloc Quebecois' respect for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, particularly when, on September 29, 1994, the Deputy Premier of Quebec made a statement concerning a government employee to the effect that ``A diplomat representing Quebec abroad who is unable to present the aspect of Quebec reality that is our path toward sovereignty is not qualified for his job''.

Hypothesis: The speaker is Canadian.

Saya juga sangat gembira mendengar tentang penghormatan Blok Quebecois terhadap Piagam Hak dan Kebebasan, terutamanya apabila, pada 29 September 1994, Timbalan Perdana Menteri Quebec membuat kenyataan mengenai seorang kakitangan kerajaan yang bermaksud bahawa ``Seorang diplomat mewakili Quebec di luar negara yang tidak dapat membentangkan aspek realiti Quebec yang menjadi laluan kita ke arah kedaulatan tidak layak untuk tugasnya''.


Premise: That, I take it, is a harm. Their works have already been created. Harm number 2. The fact that people, for the 99 percent of the copyrights that have no commercial value after 70 years, have to find the copyright holder to put them in databases. The cost of that, on my numbers in here, made up, at least a billion dollars, or they can't find the people at all and get permission, an innumerable cost, un -- valuable cost to people who want to use it.

Hypothesis: Copyright infringement is an issue for older products.

Older products have been proven to be mostly worthless, but there is no evidence that there is an issue with infringing on these old copyrights.

Itu, saya fikir, adalah satu kemudaratan. Karya mereka telah pun dibuat. Kemudaratan nombor 2. Hakikat bahawa orang ramai, bagi 99 peratus hak cipta yang tidak mempunyai nilai komersial selepas 70 tahun, perlu mencari pemegang hak cipta untuk meletakkannya dalam pangkalan data. Kos itu, pada nombor saya di sini, dibuat, sekurang-kurangnya satu bilion dolar, atau mereka tidak dapat mencari orang itu sama sekali dan mendapat kebenaran, kos yang tidak terkira, tidak -- kos yang berharga kepada orang yang ingin menggunakannya .

Pelanggaran hak cipta adalah isu untuk produk lama.


Premise: When the Corporation makes a decision to significantly reduce operations at a given location, there will be no layoffs, terminations or salary reductions for STRF and NABET employees who were on strength as of December 31, 1983 and who are still employed on the date of signature of this collective agreement, provided they have completed their probationary period.

Hypothesis: The location has a chance to close.

IT is unclear what is going on with the location.

Apabila Perbadanan membuat keputusan untuk mengurangkan operasi dengan ketara di lokasi tertentu, tidak akan ada pemberhentian, pemberhentian atau pengurangan gaji untuk kakitangan STRF dan NABET yang berkuasa pada 31 Disember 1983 dan yang masih bekerja pada tarikh tandatangan. perjanjian kolektif ini, dengan syarat mereka telah menyelesaikan tempoh percubaan mereka.


Premise: No, absolutely not. I don't object to Pandas being in the library, just like I don't object to, you know, any of the other books being in the library, as long as -- as long as it's the appropriate level and -- you know, I mean, there is a censorship process that goes into putting books in the library. So, I mean, as long as it has gone through that process and it's approved to be there, I don't have a problem with it being there.

Hypothesis: This person has strong feelings about the book Pandas

It is impossible to know because this person doesn't specify if they have read the book Pandas, and are instead passing the buck to someone else for judgment

Tidak, sama sekali tidak. Saya tidak membantah Panda berada di perpustakaan, sama seperti saya tidak membantah, anda tahu, mana-mana buku lain berada di perpustakaan, selagi -- selagi tahap yang sesuai dan -- anda tahu, maksud saya, terdapat proses penapisan yang masuk ke dalam meletakkan buku di perpustakaan. Jadi, maksud saya, selagi ia telah melalui proses itu dan ia diluluskan untuk berada di sana, saya tidak mempunyai masalah untuk berada di sana.

Orang ini mempunyai perasaan yang kuat tentang buku Panda


Premise: We understand and I ask Canadians who are watching the debate to understand the frustration of workers in one part of the country who are being told they cannot be paid the same as their brothers and sisters in other parts of the country and who are facing that huge wage gap between the public and the private sector.

Hypothesis: The county show all citizens fairness.

They are saying that the pay is not fair for everyone so it is incorrect.

Kami faham dan saya meminta warga Kanada yang menonton perdebatan untuk memahami kekecewaan pekerja di satu bahagian negara yang diberitahu mereka tidak boleh dibayar sama seperti saudara-saudara mereka di bahagian lain negara dan yang menghadapi masalah besar itu. jurang gaji antara sektor awam dan swasta.

Daerah menunjukkan keadilan kepada semua rakyat.


Premise: This will be a major incentive to universities and teaching and research hospitals across Canada to not only take advantage of the foundation for innovation and its assistance in upgrading and building research infrastructure but also to make use of the $400 million that has been made available to the university research granting councils to further support the performance of international quality research in this country.

Hypothesis: Over $400 million has been made available to the university research granting councils.

It says $400 million not over so this is incorrect but the AI did not take the word over into consideration and marked it correct.

Ini akan menjadi insentif utama kepada universiti dan hospital pengajaran dan penyelidikan di seluruh Kanada untuk bukan sahaja mengambil kesempatan daripada asas untuk inovasi dan bantuannya dalam menaik taraf dan membina infrastruktur penyelidikan tetapi juga untuk menggunakan $400 juta yang telah disediakan untuk majlis pemberian penyelidikan universiti untuk terus menyokong prestasi penyelidikan berkualiti antarabangsa di negara ini.

Lebih $400 juta telah disediakan untuk majlis pemberian penyelidikan universiti.


Premise: Well, and then what happened was, we had a conference call, Eric, Pat, several others in Pat's office and myself and Terry. They indicated that they would not. And then in the course of that conversation, the defendants counsel had stated, for example, we would like the opportunity to ask if they heard Mr. So and So say something, why didn't they write that. That's what I'm concerned about with respect to --

Hypothesis: Four people held a conference call.

No, the text implies there were more than 5 people.

Nah, dan kemudian apa yang berlaku ialah, kami mengadakan panggilan persidangan, Eric, Pat, beberapa orang lain di pejabat Pat dan saya dan Terry. Mereka menunjukkan bahawa mereka tidak akan. Dan kemudian semasa perbualan itu, peguam defendan telah menyatakan, sebagai contoh, kami ingin peluang untuk bertanya sama ada mereka mendengar Encik Fulan berkata sesuatu, mengapa mereka tidak menulis itu. Itulah yang saya bimbang berkenaan dengan --

Empat orang mengadakan panggilan persidangan.


Premise: Right, and we submit the Framers had something very different in mind than the rule against perpetuities. The point is, if this is permitted, then there is no limit to the ability to extend terms, and that is precisely contrary to what the Framers had in mind when they worried about this problem originally. What was the problem they were solving? It was, as this Court stated in Graham --

Hypothesis: The framers were not concerned with the limits on extensions.

The paragraph states that allowing limits to go unchecked is contrary to what the framers were trying to do. Therefore, they were concerned with the limits placed on extensions and tried to achieve a goal involving them.

Betul, dan kami mengemukakan bahawa Penggubal mempunyai sesuatu yang sangat berbeza dalam fikiran daripada peraturan menentang kekekalan. Intinya ialah, jika ini dibenarkan, maka tiada had kepada keupayaan untuk melanjutkan terma, dan itu adalah bertentangan dengan apa yang Framers fikirkan apabila mereka bimbang tentang masalah ini pada asalnya. Apakah masalah yang mereka selesaikan? Ia adalah, seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Mahkamah ini dalam Graham --

Pembuat bingkai tidak mengambil berat tentang had pada sambungan.


Premise: ``this section, the Ministers and the minister responsible for the other Act referred to in paragraph (6)( a ) are responsible for determining whether or not the requirements referred to in that paragraph are met by that other Act or regulations made under that Act, and ( a ) if the Ministers and that other minister determine that the''

Hypothesis: The number 5 is mentioned in the text.

It's definitely incorrect because the number 6 is mentioned, not 5. I'm not sure why this was difficult honestly..

``seksyen ini, Menteri-Menteri dan menteri yang bertanggungjawab bagi Akta lain yang disebut dalam perenggan (6)(a) bertanggungjawab untuk menentukan sama ada atau tidak kehendak yang disebut dalam perenggan itu dipenuhi oleh Akta atau peraturan lain yang dibuat di bawah itu. Bertindak, dan (a ) jika Menteri-menteri dan menteri lain itu menentukan bahawa''


Premise: Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.

Hypothesis: The Chair cannot be forced.

The statement is definitely incorrect, because the context says the chair can be forced to make a ruling.

Sekali lagi saya akan menasihati semua ahli bahawa jika mereka akan meregangkan kredibiliti hujah mereka mengenai Rang Undang-Undang C-4 dengan merujuk kepada isu-isu lain, yang sememangnya merupakan keistimewaan mereka, adalah lebih baik untuk menggunakan sedikit imaginasi dan pastikan untuk meneruskan untuk datang ke batu ujian dan tidak mencabar Pengerusi dengan memaksa Pengerusi membuat keputusan.


Premise: A Member is doing something inherently connected with a ``proceeding in Parliament'' when putting down a question on the Order Paper, a notice of motion, a notice of motion for the production of papers, or a report stage amendment; when obtaining assistance to do any of these; or when obtaining assistance to draft a bill.

Hypothesis: A Member is doing something inherently connected with a ``proceeding in Parliament'' when putting down a question on the Order Paper. No-one in Parliament is elected except the speaker. People in the House of Lords are elected.

People in Parliament are  elected but in the Lords they are not.

Seseorang Ahli sedang melakukan sesuatu yang sememangnya berkaitan dengan ``prosiding di Parlimen'' apabila mengemukakan soalan pada Perintah Kertas, notis usul, notis usul untuk mengemukakan kertas, atau pindaan peringkat laporan; apabila mendapatkan bantuan untuk melakukan mana-mana daripada ini; atau apabila mendapatkan bantuan untuk merangka rang undang-undang.

Seorang Ahli sedang melakukan sesuatu yang sememangnya berkaitan dengan ``prosiding di Parlimen'' apabila mengemukakan soalan pada Kertas Perintah. Tiada seorang pun di Parlimen yang dipilih kecuali speaker. Orang dalam Dewan Pertuanan dipilih.


Premise: This high tech park will encourage the creation or relocation of research-based companies, provide attractive employment opportunities in the high tech sector for co-op students and graduates and produce long term financial benefits that will help the university to enhance the quality and relevance of its programs.

Hypothesis: Students own the high tech park

Taman berteknologi tinggi ini akan menggalakkan penciptaan atau penempatan semula syarikat berasaskan penyelidikan, menyediakan peluang pekerjaan yang menarik dalam sektor teknologi tinggi untuk pelajar dan graduan koperasi dan menghasilkan faedah kewangan jangka panjang yang akan membantu universiti meningkatkan kualiti dan kerelevanan program-programnya.

Pelajar memiliki taman berteknologi tinggi


Premise: While the Liberal government advocates hundreds of millions of dollars for gun registry, the Canadian police information system that will house the data from this piece of legislation, the important tool police officers use for information purposes, is coming apart at the seams and is in need of a drastic influx of federal money, $200 million by some conservative estimates, to make it operational.

Hypothesis: The Canadian police information system is seldom relied on by police officers.

The Canadian police information system is an important tool used by police officers, and is certainly not seldomly used.  The system was likely confused about the meaning of the word seldom.

Walaupun kerajaan Liberal menyokong ratusan juta dolar untuk pendaftaran senjata api, sistem maklumat polis Kanada yang akan menempatkan data daripada sekeping perundangan ini, alat penting yang digunakan oleh pegawai polis untuk tujuan maklumat, semakin rosak dan memerlukan. daripada kemasukan drastik wang persekutuan, $200 juta mengikut beberapa anggaran konservatif, untuk menjadikannya beroperasi.

Sistem maklumat polis Kanada jarang diharap oleh pegawai polis.


Premise: Well, look, if it's any weekday other than next Friday when I will not be available -- I'll be traveling next Friday -- I'll be available. And, you know, we'll work through that issue. And if you're otherwise taking the deposition and we're at trial, I'll tell you that we'll construct some mechanism -- and we kind of talked about this a little bit yesterday -- where you hold the thought if counsel instructs the reporters not to answer because it's a problematic question, and we can circle back and we'll deal with that later.

Hypothesis: I'll tell you that we'll construct some mechanism -- and we kind of talked about this a little bit the day before yesterday

It was yesterday, not the day before yesterday.

Baiklah, lihat, jika mana-mana hari bekerja selain daripada Jumaat depan apabila saya tidak dapat hadir -- saya akan pergi pada hari Jumaat depan -- saya akan bersedia. Dan, anda tahu, kami akan menyelesaikan isu itu. Dan jika anda sebaliknya mengambil pemendapan dan kami sedang dibicarakan, saya akan memberitahu anda bahawa kami akan membina beberapa mekanisme -- dan kami telah membincangkan perkara ini sedikit semalam -- di mana anda memegang pemikiran jika peguam mengarahkan wartawan untuk tidak menjawab kerana ia adalah soalan yang bermasalah, dan kita boleh bulatkan semula dan kita akan menanganinya kemudian.

Saya akan memberitahu anda bahawa kami akan membina beberapa mekanisme - dan kami semacam bercakap tentang ini sedikit sehari sebelum semalam


Premise: Millions of Canadian families are going to be sitting around their kitchen tables late at night with their pocket calculators, pencils and their reams of paper trying to understand this byzantine, incomprehensible, opaque tax code we have imposed on them because of the innumerable regulations, exemptions, deductions and credits which have been inspired by motions like the one before us today.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a fan of the tax code.

He calls it incomprehensible, byzantine, and opaque, so clearly he doesn't like it. It's difficult because the speaker uses odd language that the system is probably not familiar with.

Berjuta-juta keluarga Kanada akan duduk di sekeliling meja dapur mereka larut malam dengan kalkulator poket, pensel dan rim kertas mereka cuba memahami kod cukai byzantine, tidak dapat difahami, legap yang telah kami kenakan ke atas mereka kerana peraturan, pengecualian yang tidak terkira banyaknya. , potongan dan kredit yang telah diilhamkan oleh usul seperti yang sebelum kita hari ini.

Pembesar suara adalah peminat kod cukai.


Premise: I'm for working with the groups, not just with industry but also with the citizen groups and local communities to control sprawl in ways that the local communities themselves come up with. But I disagree that we don't know the cause of global warming.

Hypothesis: This quote is suspicious of the science around climate change.

We are told "But I disagree that we don't know the cause of global warming", implying the writer thinks we DO know the cause - that the science is correct. Global warming is the less-scientific name used for climate change.

Saya bekerja dengan kumpulan itu, bukan sahaja dengan industri tetapi juga dengan kumpulan rakyat dan komuniti tempatan untuk mengawal penyebaran dengan cara yang dibuat oleh masyarakat tempatan sendiri. Tetapi saya tidak bersetuju bahawa kita tidak tahu punca pemanasan global.

Petikan ini mencurigakan sains sekitar perubahan iklim.


Premise: "The first board meeting I attended in July he approached me before the meeting started and asked if I had read the -- if I was familiar with the comments that were quoted in the paper. I told him just simply what I had read. "He asked me what I thought about it, and I said, The comments, I don't feel that is appropriate. He asked me if I asked for Mr. Buckingham's resignation on the spot. I told him I didn't think that that was going to happen."

Hypothesis: Mr. Buckingham was asked to resign

The narrator was asked if he was going to ask Mr. Buckingham to resign - he said no.

"Mesyuarat lembaga pertama yang saya hadiri pada bulan Julai dia mendekati saya sebelum mesyuarat bermula dan bertanya sama ada saya telah membaca -- jika saya biasa dengan komen yang dipetik dalam kertas itu. Saya memberitahunya secara ringkas apa yang saya baca." Dia bertanya kepada saya apa yang saya fikirkan mengenainya, dan saya berkata, Komen itu, saya rasa tidak sesuai. Dia bertanya kepada saya sama ada saya meminta perletakan jawatan Encik Buckingham serta-merta. Saya memberitahunya saya tidak menyangka perkara itu akan berlaku."

Encik Buckingham diminta meletak jawatan


Premise: On the other hand, they've said that it enhances state standards and critical thinking. In my mind, everything that you do in a classroom is teaching. And I don't necessarily think that's just in my mind. I believe that's true of all educators. The way I dress when I go to work tells my students something.

Hypothesis: Everything in the classroom is learinng.

Sebaliknya, mereka telah mengatakan bahawa ia meningkatkan standard negeri dan pemikiran kritis. Pada fikiran saya, semua yang anda lakukan di dalam bilik darjah adalah mengajar. Dan saya tidak semestinya fikir itu hanya dalam fikiran saya. Saya percaya itu benar untuk semua pendidik. Cara saya berpakaian semasa saya pergi kerja memberitahu pelajar saya sesuatu.

Segala-galanya di dalam kelas sedang belajar.


Premise: Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision?

Hypothesis: Justice McClung is a female.

My statement is definitely incorrect because the original statement states "Mr. Justice McClung." I'm guessing the AI system was fooled because it could not relate the word "female."

Yang dihormati Senator, apa yang boleh kita lakukan apabila seseorang boleh membuat kesimpulan secara adil, selepas membaca dengan saksama kontroversi semasa antara Encik Hakim McClung dan Puan Hakim L'Heureux-Dub dan keputusan masing-masing, bahawa kedua-dua hakim itu jatuh di bawah piawaian kehakiman yang sesuai. menahan diri - Hakim McClung dalam suratnya yang jelas tidak adil, dan Puan Hakim L'Heureux-Dub dalam bahasanya yang tidak adil atau tidak sopan dalam keputusannya?

Justice McClung ialah seorang perempuan.


Premise: The government is claiming that the agency will provide better, more cost effective service to the public, to business, to the provinces and territories by bringing about tax harmonization with the provinces and therefore huge tax savings resulting from the elimination of such things as duplication and overlaps in tax administration among various levels of government.

Hypothesis: The government claims that the public and businesses are not paying their fair share of taxes

It's incorrect because the government is not blaming the public or businesses, they are trying to help them by reducing taxes. The system was probably tricked because of the wording I used.

Kerajaan mendakwa bahawa agensi itu akan menyediakan perkhidmatan yang lebih baik, lebih kos efektif kepada orang ramai, kepada perniagaan, kepada wilayah dan wilayah dengan membawa penyelarasan cukai dengan wilayah dan oleh itu penjimatan cukai yang besar hasil daripada penghapusan perkara seperti pertindihan dan pertindihan dalam pentadbiran cukai di kalangan pelbagai peringkat kerajaan.

Kerajaan mendakwa bahawa orang ramai dan perniagaan tidak membayar bahagian cukai yang saksama


Premise: Justice, that's right. If only we had the Framers' copyright before us, because of course, again remember,the exclusive right the Framers spoke of was the right to print and publish. It didn't include the derivative rights, it didn't include the display rights, and it certainly --

Hypothesis: Text ended in period.

The text did not end in a period, but with a "--" signifying that it was cut off or interrupted.

Keadilan, betul. Kalaulah kami mempunyai hak cipta Framers sebelum kami, kerana sudah tentu, sekali lagi ingat, hak eksklusif Framers bercakap tentang hak untuk mencetak dan menerbitkan. Ia tidak termasuk hak terbitan, ia tidak termasuk hak paparan, dan ia pastinya --


Premise: One feature of the summary trial reform that was discussed at length in committee was the requirement to provide commanding officers with more comprehensive training in their military justice duties and responsibilities and to have them certified as qualified to conduct summary trials.

Hypothesis: Commanding officers were deemed sufficiently educated in military justice issues by the summary trial reform committee.

If that was the case they would not have discussed in length whether to provide more training.

Satu ciri pembaharuan perbicaraan ringkasan yang telah dibincangkan dengan panjang lebar dalam jawatankuasa adalah keperluan untuk menyediakan pegawai pemerintah dengan latihan yang lebih komprehensif dalam tugas dan tanggungjawab keadilan tentera mereka dan supaya mereka diperakui sebagai layak untuk menjalankan perbicaraan ringkasan.

Pegawai pemerintah dianggap cukup terdidik dalam isu keadilan tentera oleh jawatankuasa pembaharuan perbicaraan ringkasan.


Premise: But Washington is a tough town. And the way I view it is there's a lot of entrenched special interests there, people who are, you know, on one side of the issue or another and they spend enormous sums of money and they convince different senators to taut their way or different congressmen to talk about their issue, and they dig in.

Hypothesis: Senators pay lobbyists enormous amounts of money to taut their way.

Senators receive enormous amounts of money to have their minds changed by members of the house of representatives.

Tetapi Washington adalah bandar yang sukar. Dan cara saya melihatnya ialah terdapat banyak kepentingan khas yang berakar umbi di sana, orang-orang yang, anda tahu, di satu pihak dalam isu ini atau yang lain dan mereka membelanjakan sejumlah besar wang dan mereka meyakinkan senator yang berbeza untuk menegangkan cara mereka atau ahli kongres yang berbeza. untuk bercakap tentang isu mereka, dan mereka menggali.

Senator membayar pelobi sejumlah besar wang untuk menegangkan cara mereka.


Premise: Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ppin, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lucier, for the adoption of the report of the Special Joint Committee to Amend Section 93 of the Constitution Act 1867 concerning the Quebec School System, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on November 7, 1997.

Hypothesis: Senator Ppin lended his support to the motion proposed by Senator Lucier and it was deposited with the Clerk of the Senate in November of 1997, the motion dealt with the Quebec School System

It is incorrect because it switches the senators; Senator Ppin proposed it and Lucier seconded/supported it

Menyambung semula perbahasan mengenai usul Yang Berhormat Senator Ppin, disokong oleh Yang Berhormat Senator Lucier, untuk menerima pakai laporan Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas untuk Meminda Seksyen 93 Akta Perlembagaan 1867 mengenai Sistem Sekolah Quebec, yang didepositkan dengan Kerani Sekolah. Senat pada 7 November 1997.

Senator Ppin memberikan sokongannya kepada usul yang dicadangkan oleh Senator Lucier dan ia telah didepositkan dengan Kerani Senat pada November 1997, usul itu ditangani dengan Sistem Sekolah Quebec.


Premise: And unfortunately now he is trying to reassert himself in Serbian politics. Already just today the members of his political party said that they were going to ignore the orders of the new president of Serbia, and that they question his legitimacy, and he's still going to try to be actively involved.

Hypothesis: The text is mainly discussing religion.

It's definitely incorrect because the text is mainly discussing Serbian politics. It's difficult because answering the question requires a high level understanding of the entire text I guess.

Dan malangnya sekarang dia cuba untuk menegaskan dirinya dalam politik Serbia. Baru hari ini ahli parti politiknya berkata bahawa mereka akan mengabaikan arahan presiden baharu Serbia, dan mereka mempersoalkan kesahihannya, dan dia masih akan cuba untuk terlibat secara aktif.

Teks itu terutamanya membincangkan agama.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I present to the House a petition signed by many of my constituents who are asking that section 13(5) of the Canada Post Corporation Act be repealed so that rural route mail couriers are allowed to have collective bargaining rights in the same manner as private sector workers who deliver mail in rural areas.

Hypothesis: Canadian private sector rural route mail carriers do not have collective bargaining rights.

The context wants the government couriers to have the same rights as private sector workers meaning the private sector workers do have bargaining rights already.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya membentangkan kepada Dewan petisyen yang ditandatangani oleh ramai pengundi saya yang meminta seksyen 13(5) Akta Perbadanan Pos Kanada dimansuhkan supaya kurier mel laluan luar bandar dibenarkan mempunyai hak tawar-menawar kolektif dalam perkara yang sama. cara sebagai pekerja sektor swasta yang menghantar surat di kawasan luar bandar.

Pembawa mel laluan luar bandar sektor swasta Kanada tidak mempunyai hak tawar-menawar kolektif.


Premise: They leave all civility, take a cowardly gun and go to the neighbour's farmhouse, whose cousin is married to theirs, then murder the boy who could become a soldier, humiliate and renounce all sense of community, burn the home, steal the livestock, take any money from the victims and send the remaining souls, having lost all, on a foot journey into the unknown.

Hypothesis: Burning livestock is mentioned in the text.

It's definitely incorrect because stealing livestock is mentioned, and burning homes are mentioned, but not burning livestock. It's difficult because the statement contains many similar words from the text.

Mereka meninggalkan semua kesopanan, mengambil pistol pengecut dan pergi ke rumah ladang jiran, yang sepupunya berkahwin dengan mereka, kemudian membunuh budak lelaki yang boleh menjadi askar, memalukan dan meninggalkan semua rasa masyarakat, membakar rumah, mencuri ternakan, mengambil apa-apa wang daripada mangsa dan menghantar jiwa yang tinggal, setelah kehilangan semua, dalam perjalanan kaki ke tempat yang tidak diketahui.

Membakar ternakan disebutkan dalam teks.


Premise: When they try to hurt us, they are hurting themselves, because now we can talk about committees, such as the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, the Standing Committee on Finance, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, and the Standing Committee on Health.

Hypothesis: The committee on transportation is mentioned.

There is no mention of The committee on transportation

Apabila mereka cuba mencederakan kita, mereka mencederakan diri mereka sendiri, kerana sekarang kita boleh bercakap tentang jawatankuasa, seperti Jawatankuasa Tetap Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Mampan, Jawatankuasa Tetap Kewangan, Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa, Jawatankuasa Tetap. mengenai Keadilan dan Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Jawatankuasa Tetap Kesihatan.


Premise: Jim, thank you very much. Mr. Vice President, thank you very much, and I would like to thank the folks here at Wake Forest, and I want to thank you all for listening. I'm running to get some things done for America. There's too many issues left unresolved.

Hypothesis: They are running to work

Jim, terima kasih banyak. Naib Presiden, terima kasih banyak, dan saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada orang -orang di Wake Forest, dan saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada semua untuk mendengar. Saya berlari untuk menyelesaikan beberapa perkara untuk Amerika. Terlalu banyak masalah yang tidak dapat diselesaikan.


Premise: 8. Immediately following this Honourable Court's decision to grant the stay of the Feeney judgement, the Assistant Deputy Attorney General (Criminal Law) and I began receiving responses to a letter we had sent to our provincial counterparts on June 20, 1997, regarding the interim pro cedurcs, taken in each jurisdiction prior to the stay of the Feeney requesting the opinions of the provinces regarding a legislative scheme by which peace officers could obtain the constitutionally required warrant to enter a dwelling-house for the purposes of arrest.

Hypothesis: The letter was sent only by the Deputy Attorney General.

it mentioned that "We had sent" the letter, so it's joint and not just the deputy attorney general.

8. Sejurus selepas keputusan Mahkamah Yang Berhormat ini untuk membenarkan penangguhan penghakiman Feeney, saya dan Penolong Timbalan Peguam Negara (Undang-undang Jenayah) mula menerima maklum balas kepada surat yang telah kami hantar kepada rakan sejawat wilayah kami pada 20 Jun 1997, mengenai interim pro cedurcs, diambil dalam setiap bidang kuasa sebelum penangguhan Feeney meminta pendapat wilayah berkenaan skim perundangan di mana pegawai keamanan boleh mendapatkan waran yang diperlukan oleh perlembagaan untuk memasuki rumah kediaman bagi tujuan penangkapan.

Surat itu hanya dihantar oleh Timbalan Peguam Negara.


Premise: I mean, it's a penny on 1,000, or probably a lot less than that, frankly. So I can not only not imagine a person whose decision to write would be governed by such a thing, I cannot imagine a European who would come to America to copyright his work for such a reason.

Hypothesis: American copyright protections are not available to non-US citizens

The authors statement implies that Europeans can come to America for copyright, therefore it must be available to them

Maksud saya, ia adalah satu sen pada 1,000, atau mungkin jauh lebih rendah daripada itu, terus terang. Jadi saya bukan sahaja tidak dapat membayangkan seseorang yang keputusannya untuk menulis akan ditadbir oleh perkara sedemikian, saya tidak dapat membayangkan orang Eropah yang akan datang ke Amerika untuk hak cipta karyanya atas sebab sedemikian.

Perlindungan hak cipta Amerika tidak tersedia untuk bukan warganegara AS


Premise: If a bank or an insurance company acts in a fiduciary and responsible manner and must abide by the rules and regulations of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, then surely a crown corporation should be no less concerned about the security of the money it invests.

Hypothesis: The office of the superintendent of financial institutions issues regulations to crown corporations

A crown corporation is not subject to the same regulatory agency as the bank which is not totally clear from the passage.

Sekiranya bank atau syarikat insurans bertindak secara fidusiari dan bertanggungjawab dan mesti mematuhi peraturan dan peraturan Pejabat Penguasa Institusi Kewangan, maka pastinya perbadanan mahkota tidak kurang mengambil berat tentang keselamatan wang yang dilaburkannya. .

Pejabat penguasa institusi kewangan mengeluarkan peraturan untuk menobatkan syarikat


Premise: We have a government that has stood idly by without taking the kind of action which might ensure that not only jobs and consumers are protected but that Canadian control is protected and we do not end up in a situation in the country like we now have with the railways where basically we are owned and controlled by American shareholders.

Hypothesis: They are happy being controlled by the American shareholders.

They are using the American shareholders as a precautionary warning, not something to be happy about. It is a feeling so the AI didn't attribute it correctly.

Kami mempunyai kerajaan yang berdiam diri tanpa mengambil jenis tindakan yang mungkin memastikan bahawa bukan sahaja pekerjaan dan pengguna dilindungi tetapi kawalan Kanada dilindungi dan kami tidak berakhir dalam situasi di negara seperti yang kita alami sekarang dengan kereta api di mana pada dasarnya kita dimiliki dan dikawal oleh pemegang saham Amerika.

Mereka gembira dikawal oleh pemegang saham Amerika.


Premise: I must say, not having had the courtesy to be informed of the content of the motion, and having presented the House with a request twice today and having been refused twice by the government, the Progressive Conservatives and the separatists, I find it totally irresponsible at this time of the night that the government plays this little dumb game with the House of Commons.

Hypothesis: The speaker presented the House an odd-numbered amount of requests that day.

They presented two requests, which is an even number, not an odd number. It's difficult because the system does not seem to know what even and odd numbers are.

Saya mesti katakan, kerana tidak mempunyai ihsan untuk dimaklumkan tentang kandungan usul itu, dan telah mengemukakan permohonan kepada Dewan dua kali hari ini dan telah ditolak dua kali oleh kerajaan, Konservatif Progresif dan pemisah, saya mendapati ia sama sekali tidak bertanggungjawab. pada waktu malam ini kerajaan memainkan permainan bodoh ini dengan Dewan Rakyat.

Penceramah membentangkan jumlah permintaan ganjil kepada Dewan pada hari itu.


Premise: I look forward to our study of Bill C-54, and the appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce of the Privacy Commissioner, who for many years has advocated that his office act as supervisor of the application of the various privacy codes developed by financial and other institutions.

Hypothesis: His office has acted as supervisor of the various privacy codes for several years.

The text says he is advocating that his office act as supervisor.

Saya menantikan kajian kami tentang Rang Undang-Undang C-54, dan kehadiran di hadapan Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat mengenai Perbankan, Perdagangan dan Perdagangan Pesuruhjaya Privasi, yang selama bertahun-tahun telah menganjurkan agar pejabatnya bertindak sebagai penyelia permohonan pelbagai privasi kod yang dibangunkan oleh institusi kewangan dan lain-lain.

Pejabatnya telah bertindak sebagai penyelia pelbagai kod privasi selama beberapa tahun.


Premise: In 1996 the governments of Canada and the Northwest Territories, the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation, the Inuvialuit Game Council, the Paulatuk Community Corporation and the Paulatuk Hunters and Trappers Committee signed an agreement to establish a national park in the Inuvialuit settlement region near Paulatuk in the Northwest Territories.

Hypothesis: The agreement to establish a national park in the Inuvialuit settlement region was spearheaded and realized exclusively through the Canadian government and public funding

It is definitely incorrect because the agreement was a combination of the Canadian government and various corporations

Pada tahun 1996 kerajaan Kanada dan Wilayah Barat Laut, Perbadanan Serantau Inuvialuit, Majlis Permainan Inuvialuit, Perbadanan Komuniti Paulatuk dan Jawatankuasa Pemburu dan Penjebak Paulatuk menandatangani perjanjian untuk menubuhkan taman negara di wilayah penempatan Inuvialuit berhampiran Paulatuk di Barat Laut. Wilayah.

Perjanjian untuk menubuhkan taman negara di wilayah penempatan Inuvialuit telah diterajui dan direalisasikan secara eksklusif melalui kerajaan Kanada dan pembiayaan awam


Premise: The question before federal and provincial finance ministers, when they met on this subject last February, was would they simply continue to let the actuarially unfunded liability increase, or would they finally begin to deal with it, recognizing that the $600 billion would become $700 billion within a few short years.

Hypothesis: when federal and provincial finance ministers met they were trying to decide if they would finally begin to deal with funded liability increase.

it's unfunded liability increase, not funded.

Persoalan di hadapan menteri kewangan persekutuan dan wilayah, apabila mereka bertemu mengenai perkara ini pada Februari lalu, adakah mereka akan terus membiarkan liabiliti aktuari tidak dibiayai meningkat, atau adakah mereka akhirnya mula menanganinya, menyedari bahawa $600 bilion akan menjadi $700 bilion dalam masa beberapa tahun yang singkat.

apabila menteri kewangan persekutuan dan wilayah bertemu mereka cuba memutuskan sama ada mereka akhirnya akan mula menangani peningkatan liabiliti yang dibiayai.


Premise: In this regard, the Bloc Quebecois would have preferred that the Export Development Corporation draw more on the very simple and probably more effective operational framework of the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, since they require, for each sensitive project in a sensitive area, an impact study, public hearings and most importantly process transparency.

Hypothesis: The sensitive projects contain unimportant information

There is for sure important information, otherwise it wouldn't be sensitive

Dalam hal ini, Blok Quebecois lebih suka bahawa Perbadanan Pembangunan Eksport menggunakan lebih banyak rangka kerja operasi Bank Dunia atau Bank Dunia untuk Pembinaan Semula dan Pembangunan yang sangat mudah dan mungkin lebih berkesan, kerana mereka memerlukan, untuk setiap projek sensitif dalam kawasan sensitif, kajian impak, pendengaran awam dan paling penting ketelusan proses.

Projek sensitif mengandungi maklumat yang tidak penting


Premise: Well, to my understanding, intelligent design just presupposes that everything in life is too complex, that it has to be designed. But I also know that creationism was used repeatedly with the term -or, I'm sorry, not with the term "intelligent design." Intelligent design came up after the fact. But I do know that, in its original context, it was creationism that was being used. And when I think of creationists, again, I think of Young Earth creationists, and I do not subscribe to that way of thinking.

Hypothesis: "Intelligent Design" is three words.

"Intelligent Design" is two words, so the statement is definitely incorrect.

Nah, pada pemahaman saya, reka bentuk pintar hanya mengandaikan bahawa segala-galanya dalam kehidupan adalah terlalu kompleks, sehingga ia perlu direka. Tetapi saya juga tahu bahawa penciptaan telah digunakan berulang kali dengan istilah -atau, saya minta maaf, bukan dengan istilah "reka bentuk pintar." Reka bentuk pintar muncul selepas fakta itu. Tetapi saya tahu bahawa, dalam konteks asalnya, ia adalah penciptaan yang digunakan. Dan apabila saya berfikir tentang penciptaan, sekali lagi, saya memikirkan pencipta Bumi Muda, dan saya tidak melanggan cara berfikir itu.

"Reka Bentuk Pintar" ialah tiga perkataan.


Premise: (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.".

Hypothesis: Travellers must answer questions raised by preclearance officers

This statement is definitely incorrect, because the context says that a refusal to answer questions is not necessarily an offense. As such, travellers are not required to answer questions. Maybe the system didn't understand the statement.

(3) Keengganan seseorang pengembara untuk menjawab apa-apa soalan yang ditanya oleh pegawai pra-kelulusan tidak dengan sendirinya menjadi alasan yang munasabah bagi pegawai itu untuk mengesyaki bahawa pemeriksaan pengembara itu perlu bagi maksud Akta ini atau bahawa suatu kesalahan telah telah dilakukan di bawah seksyen 33 atau 34.".

Pelancong mesti menjawab soalan yang dibangkitkan oleh pegawai pra-pelepasan


Premise: Meaning if you could adapt language similar to this for the trial testimony and I agree, I have no problem in them being at a deposition prior to trial with the same kind of language relative to that. I will appear at a deposition prior to trial. I would like to do that, because of my own health conditions, maybe on Friday in terms as to a deposition, if that works within anybody's schedule, and then maybe the latter part of next week. Because what I did was, I put my surgery off until next Friday to get this done.

Hypothesis: I am prioritizing surgery over legal obligations

the writer clearly states they will be postponing surgery to take care of work obligations

Bermaksud jika anda boleh menyesuaikan bahasa yang serupa dengan ini untuk keterangan percubaan dan saya bersetuju, saya tidak mempunyai masalah untuk mereka berada di pemendapan sebelum percubaan dengan jenis bahasa yang sama berbanding dengan itu. Saya akan hadir di deposisi sebelum perbicaraan. Saya ingin berbuat demikian, kerana keadaan kesihatan saya sendiri, mungkin pada hari Jumaat dari segi pemendapan, jika ia berfungsi dalam jadual sesiapa sahaja, dan kemudian mungkin bahagian akhir minggu depan. Kerana apa yang saya lakukan ialah, saya menangguhkan pembedahan saya sehingga Jumaat depan untuk menyelesaikannya.

Saya mengutamakan pembedahan daripada tanggungjawab undang-undang


Premise: If the hon. member wants to talk about costs, let us talk about the real costs of the referendum, as reported in Le Soleil on December 2: ``Government advertising aimed at Quebec's welfare recipients, $273,000; unveiling of the preamble at the Grand Thtre de Qubec, $175,000; hiring-''.

Hypothesis: $273 was spent by the government for advertising aimed at Quebec's welfare recipients.

$273,000 was spent by the government for advertising aimed at Quebec's welfare recipients, not $273. The system was fooled by this because it does not seem to be taking extra zeros into account, only the non-zero numbers.

Jika hon. ahli ingin bercakap tentang kos, mari kita bercakap tentang kos sebenar referendum, seperti yang dilaporkan dalam Le Soleil pada 2 Disember: ``Pengiklanan kerajaan yang bertujuan untuk penerima kebajikan Quebec, $273,000; pembukaan mukadimah di Grand Thtre de Qubec, $175,000; mengupah-''.

$273 telah dibelanjakan oleh kerajaan untuk pengiklanan yang bertujuan untuk penerima kebajikan Quebec.


Premise: We were heartened to hear of the government's plan to address the issue of student finance, and to establish the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, an $800-million foundation geared mainly toward funding for university research, especially in health, the environment, science and engineering.

Hypothesis: The Canadian Foundation would then be able to pay for the student's finance debt.

Nope, the foundation is for university research, not for paying tuition finance debt of the students

Kami gembira mendengar rancangan kerajaan untuk menangani isu kewangan pelajar, dan menubuhkan Yayasan Inovasi Kanada, sebuah yayasan bernilai $800 juta yang ditujukan terutamanya untuk membiayai penyelidikan universiti, terutamanya dalam kesihatan, alam sekitar, sains dan kejuruteraan.

Yayasan Kanada kemudian akan dapat membayar hutang kewangan pelajar.


Premise: Senator Kerry, after 9/11 -- and this is a new question for you -- it seemed to me that the country came together as I've never seen it come together since World War II. But some of that seems to have melted away. I think it's fair to say we've become pretty polarized, perhaps because of the political season.

Hypothesis: Senator Kerry contains a q

Senator Kerry, selepas 9/11 -- dan ini adalah soalan baru untuk anda -- saya nampaknya negara ini bersatu kerana saya tidak pernah melihatnya bersatu sejak Perang Dunia II. Tetapi sebahagian daripada itu nampaknya telah cair. Saya fikir adalah adil untuk mengatakan bahawa kita telah menjadi agak terpolarisasi, mungkin kerana musim politik.


Premise: Honourable senators, as I stand here today, it is particularly painful to know that in spite of the shock, the revulsion, the widespread publicity and awareness that has flowed from this dreadful event, violence against women and children continues to grow in our country and around the world.

Hypothesis: Honourable friends, as I stand here today, it is particularly painful to know that in spite of the shock, the revulsion,

They were not his honorable friends, they were senators.

Yang dihormati Senator, semasa saya berdiri di sini hari ini, adalah amat menyakitkan untuk mengetahui bahawa di sebalik kejutan, kebencian, publisiti dan kesedaran yang meluas yang telah mengalir daripada peristiwa yang mengerikan ini, keganasan terhadap wanita dan kanak-kanak terus berkembang di negara kita dan seluruh dunia.

Rakan-rakan yang dihormati, semasa saya berdiri di sini hari ini, adalah amat menyakitkan untuk mengetahui bahawa di sebalik kejutan, kebencian,


Premise: I would like to take this opportunity to say that while we have been fortunate enough not to be involved in a major war for many, many years now and in fact for some decades, we do not forget the fact that many of those serving in our armed forces are serving in very troubled hot spots around the world.

Hypothesis: many, many years is a relatively short amount of time.

Many, many years is usually perceived as a long amount of time. I can see how the system may have judged this as relative.

Saya ingin mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengatakan bahawa walaupun kita cukup bernasib baik kerana tidak terlibat dalam perang besar selama bertahun-tahun sekarang dan sebenarnya selama beberapa dekad, kita tidak melupakan hakikat bahawa ramai daripada mereka yang berkhidmat di negara kita. angkatan tentera sedang berkhidmat di kawasan panas yang sangat bermasalah di seluruh dunia.

banyak, bertahun-tahun adalah jumlah masa yang agak singkat.


Premise: It is this Canadian genius that guided the Government of Canada in the creation of the national child benefit program, the establishment of the Canada millennium scholarship fund, the restoration of $11.5 billion transfer payments for medicare and the increase in the budget for research, innovation and development.

Hypothesis: national child benefit program received $11.5 billion

the $11.5 billion transfer payments for medicare and the increase in the budget for research, innovation and development. not child benifit program

Genius Kanada inilah yang membimbing Kerajaan Kanada dalam penciptaan program faedah kanak-kanak kebangsaan, penubuhan dana biasiswa milenium Kanada, pemulihan bayaran pemindahan $11.5 bilion untuk penjagaan perubatan dan peningkatan dalam belanjawan untuk penyelidikan, inovasi dan pembangunan.

program faedah kanak-kanak negara menerima $11.5 bilion


Premise: And what's happening is the level of pollution is increasing significantly. Now, here is the good news, Jim. If we take the leadership role and build the new technologies, like the new kinds of cars and trucks that Detroit is itching to build, then we can create millions of good new jobs by being first into the market with these new kinds of cars and trucks and other kinds of technologies.

Hypothesis: Jim made this statement

Jim is being addressed in the statement, he is not speaking.

Dan apa yang berlaku ialah tahap pencemaran meningkat dengan ketara. Sekarang, inilah berita baiknya, Jim. Jika kita mengambil peranan kepimpinan dan membina teknologi baharu, seperti jenis kereta dan trak baharu yang Detroit berminat untuk membina, maka kita boleh mencipta berjuta-juta pekerjaan baharu yang baik dengan menjadi yang pertama memasuki pasaran dengan jenis kereta dan trak baharu ini dan jenis teknologi lain.


Premise: (d) to persons of Canadian citizenship who were members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom including the Prime Ministers of Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justices, and some Cabinet Ministers of Canada including the Leader of the Government in the Senate 1921-1930 and 1935-1942 the Right Honourable Senator Raoul Dandurand appointed to the United Kingdom Privy Council in 1941;

Hypothesis: Chief Justice Raoul Dandurand was appointed to the United Kingdom Privy Council in 1941.

Raoul Dandurand was a Right Honourable Senator, not a Chief Justice. The system was fooled because it was not matching a person's title with their name.

(d) kepada orang berkewarganegaraan Kanada yang menjadi ahli Majlis Privy United Kingdom termasuk Perdana Menteri Kanada, Ketua Hakim Negara Mahkamah Agung Kanada, dan beberapa Menteri Kabinet Kanada termasuk Ketua Kerajaan di Senat 1921 -1930 dan 1935-1942 Yang Amat Berhormat Senator Raoul Dandurand dilantik ke Majlis Privy United Kingdom pada tahun 1941;

Ketua Hakim Negara Raoul Dandurand telah dilantik ke Majlis Privy United Kingdom pada tahun 1941.


Premise: Honourable senators, pursuant to rule 23(6), and on behalf of Senator Hays, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-Japan Interparliamentary Group to the seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum which took place in Lima, Peru from January 11 to 14, 1999.

Hypothesis: the sixth annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum took place in Lima, Peru from January 11 to 14, 1999.

It states "the seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum which took place in Lima, Peru from January 11 to 14, 1999." Therefore the sixth annual meeting could not possibly taken place there in 1999.

Senator yang dihormati, menurut peraturan 23(6), dan bagi pihak Senator Hays, saya mempunyai penghormatan untuk membentangkan, dalam kedua-dua bahasa rasmi, laporan delegasi Kanada Kumpulan Antara Parlimen Kanada-Jepun kepada mesyuarat tahunan ketujuh Forum Parlimen Asia-Pasifik yang berlangsung di Lima, Peru dari 11 hingga 14 Januari 1999.

mesyuarat tahunan keenam Forum Parlimen Asia-Pasifik berlangsung di Lima, Peru dari 11 hingga 14 Januari 1999.


Premise: The president decided to give it to the wealthiest Americans in a tax cut. Now, Alan Greenspan, who I think has done a terrific job in monetary policy, supports the president's tax cut. I don't. I support it for the middle class, not that part of it that goes to people earning more than $200,000 a year.

Hypothesis: The president has a q

Presiden memutuskan untuk memberikannya kepada orang terkaya Amerika dalam pemotongan cukai. Kini, Alan Greenspan, yang saya fikir telah melakukan kerja yang hebat dalam dasar monetari, menyokong pemotongan cukai presiden. Saya tidak. Saya menyokongnya untuk kelas pertengahan, bukan sebahagian daripadanya yang diberikan kepada orang yang berpendapatan lebih daripada $200,000 setahun.


Premise: I've developed -- put out money in my budget to expand community health centers all around the country. These are places where people can get primary care. Secondly -- and they're good. They're very important parts of the safety net of health care. Secondly, that you get a $2,000 rebate from the government if you're a family of $30,000 or less -- it scales down as you get higher -- that you can use to purchase health care in the private markets.

Hypothesis: A family of $30,000 or less can get a rebate from the government that is worth more than $2,999.

The rebate is only worth $2,000 which is not more than $2,999. It's difficult because the system has trouble comparing numbers sometimes it seems like.

Saya telah membangunkan -- mengeluarkan wang dalam bajet saya untuk mengembangkan pusat kesihatan masyarakat di seluruh negara. Ini adalah tempat di mana orang ramai boleh mendapatkan penjagaan primer. Kedua -- dan mereka bagus. Ia adalah bahagian yang sangat penting dalam jaringan keselamatan penjagaan kesihatan. Kedua, anda mendapat rebat $2,000 daripada kerajaan jika anda sekeluarga $30,000 atau kurang -- ia berkurangan apabila anda semakin tinggi -- yang boleh anda gunakan untuk membeli penjagaan kesihatan di pasaran swasta.

Keluarga yang berjumlah $30,000 atau kurang boleh mendapat rebat daripada kerajaan yang bernilai lebih daripada $2,999.


Premise: The policies of the Reform Party, the policies of the new Canadian alliance, are such that I believe Quebecers could live with them if they took the time to read them, study them and give them careful thought, and not simply say with a prejudiced point of view ``We are not going to listen to them''.

Hypothesis: The Reform Party is prejudiced against the new Canadian alliance.

The Reform Party is supporting the new Canadian alliance.

Dasar Parti Pembaharuan, dasar pakatan baharu Kanada, adalah sedemikian rupa sehingga saya percaya orang Quebec boleh hidup bersama mereka jika mereka meluangkan masa untuk membacanya, mengkajinya dan memberi mereka pemikiran yang teliti, dan tidak hanya berkata dengan pandangan yang berprasangka. pandangan ``Kami tidak akan mendengar mereka''.

Parti Reformasi berprasangka buruk terhadap pakatan Kanada yang baru.


Premise: The government has decided to make the changes required in two stages, and this part covers only what the government is almost forced to do as a signatory to the 1976 international convention, which was to come into force in 1990, but whose implementation was later postponed to March 31, 1996, at the latest.

Hypothesis: March has only 23 days.

If something can occur on March 31, then to say March has only 23 days is definitely incorrect.

Kerajaan telah memutuskan untuk membuat perubahan yang diperlukan dalam dua peringkat, dan bahagian ini hanya meliputi apa yang kerajaan hampir terpaksa lakukan sebagai penandatangan konvensyen antarabangsa 1976, yang akan berkuat kuasa pada 1990, tetapi pelaksanaannya kemudian ditangguhkan. hingga 31 Mac 1996, selewat-lewatnya.


Premise: I haven't started naming names except for one person, and that's Mr. Richard Cheney who I thought did a great job the other night. He's a vice presidential nominee who represents -- I think people got to see why I picked him. He's man of solid judgment and he's going to be a person to stand by my side.

Hypothesis: I haven't started naming names except for one person, and that's Mr. Richard beard

Saya belum mula menamakan nama kecuali satu orang, dan itulah Encik Richard Cheney yang saya fikir melakukan kerja yang hebat pada malam yang lain. Dia seorang calon naib presiden yang mewakili -- saya rasa orang ramai perlu melihat sebab saya memilihnya. Dia seorang yang mempunyai pertimbangan yang kukuh dan dia akan menjadi orang yang berdiri di sisi saya.

Saya belum mula menamakan nama kecuali satu orang, dan itu ialah janggut Encik Richard


Premise: Yes, but take one of the early extensions, just extending a -- an already granted patent to an inventor for an extra 10 years. How can that be squared with the language of the provision? Maybe Congress did it, but maybe it acted improperly when it did it.

Hypothesis: Congress definitely did it

It is incorrect to say congress definitely did it because we do not know from the information given that they definitely did, so it is therefore an incorrect statement. It states 'maybe congress did it', with the emphasis on maybe. Therefore the system likely could not understand the difference between maybe and definitely, and how it is wrong to say definite unless you are sure.

Ya, tetapi ambil salah satu sambungan awal, hanya melanjutkan -- paten yang telah diberikan kepada pencipta selama 10 tahun tambahan. Bagaimanakah ia boleh diselaraskan dengan bahasa peruntukan? Mungkin Kongres melakukannya, tetapi mungkin ia bertindak tidak wajar apabila ia melakukannya.


Premise: I want to inform the hon. member and the House that Canada co-sponsored a resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Commission which condemned the ethnic cleansing, which demanded an immediate cessation of the persecution of Kosovars, and which asked the international community to support the work of the international criminal tribunal.

Hypothesis: The Canadian house co-sponsored the condemned ethnic cleansing.

It seemed as if the House co-sponsored ethnic cleansing.

Saya nak maklumkan kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli dan Dewan bahawa Kanada menaja bersama resolusi di Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu yang mengecam penghapusan etnik, yang menuntut pemberhentian segera penganiayaan terhadap Kosovar, dan yang meminta masyarakat antarabangsa menyokong kerja tribunal jenayah antarabangsa .

Rumah Kanada menaja bersama pembersihan etnik yang dikutuk itu.


Premise: "Question: Is there anything else that the board has done here in connection with the curriculum change that provides a basis for your complaint? "Answer: From what I can see from attending the board meetings, I don't know, because so much of the curriculum debate takes place at non-public meetings that I am not aware of. And when board members are questioned at meetings, they really don't answer any questions. So it gives this whole illusion of secrecy to the process, which, you know, may be a big part of the problem. It may just be a big misunderstanding."

Hypothesis: Most of the curriculum debate takes place at -public meetings

This is incorrect because it takes place at non-public meetings

"Soalan: Adakah terdapat apa-apa lagi yang lembaga telah lakukan di sini berkaitan dengan perubahan kurikulum yang menyediakan asas untuk aduan anda? "Jawapan: Apa yang saya dapat lihat daripada menghadiri mesyuarat lembaga, saya tidak tahu, kerana begitu banyak perbahasan kurikulum berlaku di mesyuarat bukan umum yang saya tidak sedar. Dan apabila ahli lembaga disoal dalam mesyuarat, mereka benar-benar tidak menjawab sebarang soalan. Jadi ia memberikan keseluruhan ilusi kerahsiaan ini kepada proses, yang, anda tahu, mungkin merupakan sebahagian besar daripada masalah itu. Ia mungkin hanya salah faham yang besar."

Kebanyakan perbahasan kurikulum berlaku di -mesyuarat awam


Premise: Well, when I got to be a part of the current administration, it was right after -- I was one of the few members of my political party to support former President Bush in the Persian Gulf War resolution, and at the end of that war, for whatever reason, it was not finished in a way that removed Saddam Hussein from power.

Hypothesis: The Perisan Gulf war brought stability to an otherwise insecure region.

The Persian Gulf war did not bring stability, and in fact ended in such a way as to leave Saddam Hussein in power.

Nah, apabila saya menjadi sebahagian daripada pentadbiran semasa, ia sejurus selepas -- saya adalah salah seorang daripada segelintir ahli parti politik saya yang menyokong bekas Presiden Bush dalam resolusi Perang Teluk Parsi, dan pada akhir perang itu. , atas sebab apa pun, ia tidak diselesaikan dengan cara yang menyingkirkan Saddam Hussein daripada kuasa.

Perang Teluk Parsi membawa kestabilan kepada wilayah yang sebaliknya tidak selamat.


Premise: But how can that happen when we know from the start that this agency will be made up of an extremely large number of employees-40,000 is the number we have been seeing-who will no longer come under the Public Service Employment Act and who will therefore have difficulty keeping their union?

Hypothesis: Over forty-thousand people will have difficulty keeping their union.

The original statement specifies that specifically 40,000 people will have difficulty keeping their union, not more. The system was fooled here because it is not taking into account the possibility of 40,000 being an imprecise number.

Tetapi bagaimana itu boleh berlaku apabila kita tahu dari awal bahawa agensi ini akan terdiri daripada bilangan pekerja yang sangat besar-40,000 adalah jumlah yang kita lihat-yang tidak lagi akan berada di bawah Akta Pekerjaan Perkhidmatan Awam dan oleh itu siapa yang akan mengalami kesukaran untuk mengekalkan kesatuan mereka?

Lebih empat puluh ribu orang akan mengalami kesukaran untuk mengekalkan kesatuan mereka.


Premise: He talks about middle-class tax cuts. That's exactly where the tax cuts went. Most of the tax cuts went to low- and middle-income Americans. And now the tax code is more fair. Twenty percent of the upper-income people pay about 80 percent of the taxes in America today because of how we structured the tax cuts. People listening out there know the benefits of the tax cuts we passed. If you have a child, you got tax relief. If you're married, you got tax relief. If you pay any tax at all, you got tax relief. All of which was opposed by my opponent.

Hypothesis: The tax code was fair then they made it unfair.

There is a direct statement that says that the tax cuts are now more fair than they were.

Dia bercakap tentang pemotongan cukai kelas pertengahan. Di situlah pemotongan cukai berlaku. Kebanyakan pemotongan cukai diberikan kepada rakyat Amerika yang berpendapatan rendah dan sederhana. Dan kini kod cukai lebih adil. Dua puluh peratus daripada orang berpendapatan tinggi membayar kira-kira 80 peratus daripada cukai di Amerika hari ini kerana cara kami menstrukturkan pemotongan cukai. Orang yang mendengar di luar sana tahu faedah pemotongan cukai yang kami lalui. Jika anda mempunyai anak, anda mendapat pelepasan cukai. Jika anda sudah berkahwin, anda mendapat pelepasan cukai. Jika anda membayar apa-apa cukai sama sekali, anda mendapat pelepasan cukai. Semuanya ditentang oleh lawan saya.

Kod cukai adalah adil maka mereka menjadikannya tidak adil.


Premise: As for us, we are more and more convinced that we need to have our own country by the year 2000, to get out of the mess that the Prime Minister is creating once again, because setting up new programs will generate new deficits, unless the Prime Minister simply intends to once again force taxpayers to make huge efforts to promote his party's visibility and his own.

Hypothesis: Many people would prefer to stick with this country than a new country by the year 2000.

The text clearly states they would prefer their 'own' country, than what they currently have. The agent found it difficult to see it as being totally incorrect as it found the wording hard to follow with the text.

Bagi kita, kita semakin yakin bahawa kita perlu mempunyai negara sendiri menjelang tahun 2000, untuk keluar dari kekacauan yang diwujudkan oleh Perdana Menteri sekali lagi, kerana menubuhkan program baru akan menjana defisit baru, melainkan jika Perdana Menteri hanya berhasrat untuk sekali lagi memaksa pembayar cukai melakukan usaha besar untuk mempromosikan keterlihatan partinya dan partinya.

Ramai orang lebih suka untuk kekal dengan negara ini daripada negara baru menjelang tahun 2000.


Premise: Perhaps those who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada just do not understand the process and do not understand the value of a negotiated reconciliation of aboriginal rights within the Canadian federation.

Hypothesis: Perhaps those don't who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada.

Perhaps those who argue that the Nisga'a final agreement cannot be given full effect without first amending the Constitution of Canada.  The system was confused by the wording.

Mungkin mereka yang berhujah bahawa perjanjian akhir Nisga'a tidak boleh diberi kesan sepenuhnya tanpa meminda Perlembagaan Kanada terlebih dahulu hanya tidak memahami proses dan tidak memahami nilai perdamaian yang dirundingkan bagi hak orang asli dalam persekutuan Kanada.

Mungkin mereka yang tidak berhujah bahawa perjanjian akhir Nisga'a tidak boleh diberi kesan sepenuhnya tanpa meminda Perlembagaan Kanada terlebih dahulu.


Premise: And I don't want there to be a misunderstanding in terms as to this case being wrongly focused. And what I mean by that, with regard to all of you in this room is that we've got approximately 40 people from the media that are observing this trial in the courtroom, plus outside of the courtroom.

Hypothesis: Exactly 40 people are observing the trial

There are people outside the courtroom observing as well, so there are more than 40 people.

Dan saya tidak mahu berlaku salah faham dalam hal kes ini tersalah fokus. Dan apa yang saya maksudkan dengan itu, berkenaan dengan anda semua di dalam bilik ini ialah kami mempunyai kira-kira 40 orang daripada media yang memerhati perbicaraan ini di dalam bilik mahkamah, ditambah di luar bilik mahkamah.

Tepat 40 orang sedang memerhati perbicaraan


Premise: Whenever we are engaged in a conflict, or whenever we are contemplating a conflict which has the potential that this conflict has, we need to realize that it may well be a situation, no matter what the outcome, in which there are no winners and losers but rather a situation in which everybody loses when we choose war as an alternative to diplomacy.

Hypothesis: The can be losers in war, but there can also never be winners in war as well.

The statement is in the correct category because it is possible for there to be a winner in a war. The system may have been confused by the wording in the excerpt, which doesn't specifically talk about winners in war.

Setiap kali kita terlibat dalam konflik, atau apabila kita memikirkan konflik yang mempunyai potensi konflik ini, kita perlu sedar bahawa ia mungkin satu situasi, tidak kira apa keputusannya, di mana tidak ada yang menang dan yang kalah. sebaliknya situasi di mana semua orang kalah apabila kita memilih perang sebagai alternatif kepada diplomasi.

Mereka boleh menjadi orang yang kalah dalam peperangan, tetapi tidak akan pernah ada pemenang dalam peperangan juga.


Premise: We have a copyright term that's consistent with the concept of the creator plus the creator's first generation heirs. We have a copyright term, remember, which supersedes the earlier copyright provisions that were added to the period between creation and publication, so that the limited number of years in the first, the 1790 and the 1831 statute were the number of years plus the relatively unlimited period of time between creation and publication, so we don't have anything remotely like that in this situation.

Hypothesis: 1831 was more than five hundred years ago.

1831 was 188 years ago, so to say it was more than five hundred years ago is definitely incorrect.

Kami mempunyai istilah hak cipta yang konsisten dengan konsep pencipta serta pewaris generasi pertama pencipta. Kami mempunyai istilah hak cipta, ingat, yang menggantikan peruntukan hak cipta terdahulu yang telah ditambahkan pada tempoh antara penciptaan dan penerbitan, supaya bilangan tahun yang terhad pada tahun pertama, statut 1790 dan 1831 ialah bilangan tahun ditambah dengan relatifnya. tempoh masa yang tidak terhad antara penciptaan dan penerbitan, jadi kami tidak mempunyai apa-apa dari jauh seperti itu dalam situasi ini.

1831 adalah lebih daripada lima ratus tahun yang lalu.


Premise: Why -- I mean, I think you have a point on this equity principle. I wonder, is there any review there? That is, suppose you have a statute, as this one arguably is, where 99.9 percent, many billions of dollars of benefits, are going to the existing holders of copyright on grounds of equity, and the effect of the statute in eliciting new works is near zero. I mean, that would seem -- where this equity idea is the camel and the production idea is the gnat, and is there any -- can we say something like that, or does Congress have total leeway in respect to --

Hypothesis: camel has the letter b

Mengapa -- Maksud saya, saya fikir anda mempunyai alasan mengenai prinsip ekuiti ini. Saya tertanya-tanya, adakah ulasan di sana? Maksudnya, andaikan anda mempunyai statut, seperti yang boleh dipertikaikan, di mana 99.9 peratus, berbilion-bilion dolar faedah, akan diberikan kepada pemegang hak cipta yang sedia ada atas alasan ekuiti, dan kesan statut itu dalam mendapatkan karya baharu adalah hampir sifar. Maksud saya, itu nampaknya -- di mana idea ekuiti ini adalah unta dan idea pengeluaran adalah agas, dan adakah -- bolehkah kita mengatakan sesuatu seperti itu, atau adakah Kongres mempunyai kelonggaran sepenuhnya berkenaan dengan --


Premise: Well, in numerous ways. First, as a teacher, professionally, I feel that teachers in general are harmed, myself, as well, because there's a dichotomy here in what they're saying about this statement that they have passed on intelligent design as they're not teaching it.

Hypothesis: Intelligent design is being taught.

My statement directly contradicts the story. Perhaps the AI is fooled by word order.

Nah, dalam pelbagai cara. Pertama, sebagai seorang guru, secara profesional, saya merasakan bahawa guru secara amnya dirugikan, saya sendiri, juga, kerana terdapat dikotomi di sini dalam apa yang mereka katakan tentang kenyataan ini bahawa mereka telah menyampaikan reka bentuk pintar kerana mereka tidak mengajarnya .


Premise: These criteria and conditions, pillars of Canada's health care system, are: one, reasonable access to medically required services unimpeded by charges at the point of service or other barriers; two, comprehensive coverage for medically required services; three, universality of insured coverage for all provincial residents on equal terms and conditions; four, portability of benefits within Canada and abroad; and five, public administration of the health insurance plan on a non-profit basis.

Hypothesis: The seven listed criteria and conditions are essential to the functioning of Canada's health care system.

There are only 5 criteria and conditions. The number 7 is incorrect.

Kriteria dan syarat ini, tonggak sistem penjagaan kesihatan Kanada, adalah: satu, akses munasabah kepada perkhidmatan yang diperlukan dari segi perubatan tanpa dihalang oleh caj di tempat perkhidmatan atau halangan lain; dua, perlindungan komprehensif untuk perkhidmatan yang diperlukan dari segi perubatan; tiga, kesejagatan perlindungan yang diinsuranskan untuk semua penduduk wilayah pada terma dan syarat yang sama; empat, mudah alih faedah dalam Kanada dan luar negara; dan lima, pentadbiran awam pelan insurans kesihatan atas dasar bukan keuntungan.

Tujuh kriteria dan syarat yang disenaraikan adalah penting untuk berfungsi sistem penjagaan kesihatan Kanada.


Premise: It is simply the government making a decision because of enormous public pressure from opposition parties, from provincial governments and most of all from Canadians who have told the government that they are suffering from the impact of massive cutbacks in the Canada health and social transfer.

Hypothesis: Most of the Canadians were not affected by cutbacks.

The prompt mentions that "most of all Canadians" were suffering from massive cutbacks.

Hanya kerajaan yang membuat keputusan kerana tekanan awam yang besar daripada parti pembangkang, daripada kerajaan wilayah dan kebanyakannya daripada rakyat Kanada yang telah memberitahu kerajaan bahawa mereka mengalami kesan pengurangan besar-besaran dalam pemindahan kesihatan dan sosial Kanada.

Kebanyakan orang Kanada tidak terjejas oleh pemotongan.


Premise: We want people to know very clearly that the Bloc Quebecois and the Parti Quebecois want to hold a referendum, whereas two thirds of Quebeckers are opposed, because they know that a referendum is bad for economic growth and employment, and means less revenue to put towards health and education.

Hypothesis: Less than 50% of Quebeckers are opposed.

Two thirds are opposed, which is more than 50%, not less. It's difficult because the system probably doesn't know how to translate two thirds into a percentage I guess.

Kami mahu orang ramai mengetahui dengan jelas bahawa Bloc Quebecois dan Parti Quebecois mahu mengadakan referendum, manakala dua pertiga daripada Quebeckers menentang, kerana mereka tahu bahawa referendum tidak baik untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi dan pekerjaan, dan bermakna kurang hasil untuk digunakan. kesihatan dan pendidikan.

Kurang daripada 50% penduduk Quebec menentang.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, according to last week's supplementary estimates the government is planning to spend billions on some interesting projects including $4 million for millennium art projects; $22 million for new chanceries in Colombia, Haiti, Venezuela and South Korea; $3.2 million for senators; and $1 million for international environmental organizations.

Hypothesis: they plan to spend 22 million on new churches in Colombia, Haiti

context says they will spend "$22 million for new chanceries in Colombia, Haiti," I said 22 million on churches

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, mengikut anggaran tambahan minggu lepas kerajaan merancang untuk membelanjakan berbilion-bilion untuk beberapa projek menarik termasuk $4 juta untuk projek seni alaf; $22 juta untuk canselor baharu di Colombia, Haiti, Venezuela dan Korea Selatan; $3.2 juta untuk senator; dan $1 juta untuk organisasi alam sekitar antarabangsa.

mereka merancang untuk membelanjakan 22 juta untuk gereja baharu di Colombia, Haiti


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I was pointing out that today, as we are debating the estimates, when we think the most important issue facing parliament is the spending of the public purse, the approving of taxation and the spending of $145 billion of taxpayer money, we would take that very seriously in our debates in the House of Commons.

Hypothesis: The number mentioned in the text is larger than $146 billion.

It's definitely incorrect because $145 billion is not larger than $146 billion. It's difficult perhaps because the system does not know what the "number mentioned in the text" means.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya menegaskan bahawa hari ini, semasa kita membahaskan anggaran, apabila kita fikir isu paling penting yang dihadapi parlimen ialah perbelanjaan wang awam, kelulusan cukai dan perbelanjaan wang pembayar cukai $145 bilion, kita akan mengambil serius perkara itu dalam perbahasan kami di Dewan Rakyat.

Nombor yang disebut dalam teks adalah lebih besar daripada $146 bilion.


Premise: At the upcoming meeting of the attorneys general, serious consideration must also be given to expanding police powers to allow the admissibility of evidence such as roadside sobriety tests and police videotaping, and making it mandatory that breath or blood-testing for alcohol be obtained at all crash scenes involving fatalities or serious injuries.

Hypothesis: At the upcoming meeting of the police chiefs, serious consideration must also be given to expanding police powers.

It's definitely incorrect because it says the upcoming meeting of the attorneys general, not police chiefs. It's difficult perhaps because I used the word police twice which confused the system.

Pada mesyuarat peguam negara yang akan datang, pertimbangan serius juga mesti diberikan untuk memperluaskan kuasa polis untuk membenarkan bukti diterima seperti ujian ketenangan di tepi jalan dan rakaman video polis, dan mewajibkan bahawa nafas atau ujian darah untuk alkohol diperolehi sama sekali adegan kemalangan yang melibatkan kematian atau kecederaan serius.

Pada mesyuarat ketua-ketua polis yang akan datang, pertimbangan yang serius juga mesti diberikan untuk meluaskan kuasa polis.


Premise: That the Senate do unite with the House of Commons in the appointment of a Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons to study matters related to the proposed resolution respecting a proposed Amendment to Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867 concerning the Quebec school system;

Hypothesis: The US Senate should unite with the House of Commons to study matters related to the proposed resolution

The article is talking about Canadian senate. not US senate

Bahawa Dewan Negara bersatu dengan Dewan Rakyat dalam pelantikan Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas Dewan Negara dan Dewan Rakyat untuk mengkaji perkara yang berkaitan dengan resolusi yang dicadangkan berkenaan dengan cadangan Pindaan kepada Seksyen 93 Akta Perlembagaan, 1867 mengenai Quebec. sistem persekolahan;

Senat AS harus bersatu dengan Dewan Rakyat untuk mengkaji perkara yang berkaitan dengan resolusi yang dicadangkan


Premise: I think the administration did the right thing in that case. I do. It was a horrible situation, no one liked to see it on our TV screens, but it's a case where we need to make sure we have an early warning system in place in places where there could be ethnic cleansing and genocide the way we saw it there in Rwanda.

Hypothesis: They need to make sure there is a early warning system in place all over the country.

This is incorrect because they only want the system in places where there could be ethnic cleansing and genocide.

Saya fikir pentadbiran telah melakukan perkara yang betul dalam kes itu. Saya sudi. Ia adalah situasi yang mengerikan, tiada siapa yang suka melihatnya di skrin TV kami, tetapi ini adalah kes di mana kami perlu memastikan kami mempunyai sistem amaran awal di tempat yang mungkin berlaku pembersihan etnik dan pembunuhan beramai-ramai seperti yang kami lihat. ada di Rwanda.

Mereka perlu memastikan terdapat sistem amaran awal di seluruh negara.


Premise: For example, in some jurisdictions the police may provide a card to all victims they come into contact with which refers victims to victim witness services and/or which refers to the victim impact statement program, or the crown may have a notation in the file that the victim has indeed been advised.

Hypothesis: All victims are referred to victims witness services

Some can go to the victim impact statement program instead

Sebagai contoh, dalam sesetengah bidang kuasa polis boleh memberikan kad kepada semua mangsa yang mereka hubungi yang merujuk mangsa kepada perkhidmatan saksi mangsa dan/atau yang merujuk kepada program kenyataan kesan mangsa, atau mahkota mungkin mempunyai notasi dalam fail yang mangsa memang telah dinasihatkan.

Semua mangsa dirujuk kepada perkhidmatan saksi mangsa


Premise: Yeah, I can't imagine what it would be like to be singled out because of race and stopped and harassed. That's just flat wrong, and that's not what America is all about. And so we ought to do everything we can to end racial profiling. One of my concerns, though, is I don't want to federalize the local police forces.

Hypothesis: The speaker has been singled out because of their race and stopped.

If the speaker cannot imagine what it would be like to be singled out because of race and stopped, then they have never been singled out because of their race and stopped, as one is able to imagine what one has experienced.  Therefore the statement that "The speaker has been singled out because of their race and stopped" is definitely incorrect.

Ya, saya tidak dapat bayangkan bagaimana rasanya jika dikhususkan kerana kaum dan dihentikan dan diganggu. Itu hanya salah rata, dan itu bukan maksud Amerika. Oleh itu, kita harus melakukan segala yang kita mampu untuk menamatkan profil kaum. Salah satu kebimbangan saya ialah saya tidak mahu mesekutukan pasukan polis tempatan.

Pembesar suara telah dipilih kerana kaum mereka dan dihentikan.


Premise: I have seen no indication that these Liberal members who sit on the justice committee and others who well over a year ago unanimously sent to the justice committee a supply day motion by the Reform Party that called for action are serious in any way about addressing the very serious crime of impaired driving.

Hypothesis: Their are only liberals on the justice committee.

Saya tidak melihat sebarang petunjuk bahawa ahli-ahli Liberal yang menganggotai jawatankuasa keadilan dan lain-lain yang lebih setahun lalu sebulat suara menghantar usul hari bekalan kepada jawatankuasa keadilan oleh Parti Pembaharuan yang meminta tindakan adalah serius dalam apa-apa cara untuk menangani masalah ini. jenayah serius pemanduan terjejas.

Mereka hanya liberal dalam jawatankuasa keadilan.


Premise: There have also been increases in the registered education savings plan, the homebuyers plan, the part time education deductions, the child care expense deductions, and, as I mentioned already, the caregiver tax credit which provides, as it states here, a new refundable tax credit up to $400 per caregiver.

Hypothesis: the new refundable tax credit is up to $4000 per caregiver

Terdapat juga peningkatan dalam pelan simpanan pendidikan berdaftar, pelan pembeli rumah, potongan pendidikan sambilan, potongan perbelanjaan penjagaan kanak-kanak, dan, seperti yang telah saya nyatakan, kredit cukai pengasuh yang menyediakan, seperti yang dinyatakan di sini, bayaran balik baharu kredit cukai sehingga $400 setiap penjaga.

kredit cukai boleh balik baharu adalah sehingga $4000 bagi setiap penjaga


Premise: In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the unemployed by revoking the current eligibility rules for new entrants and using surpluses for training for the unemployed, thereby promoting direct employment.

Hypothesis: In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the women

it was the unemployed not women so it is incorrect

Dalam yang pertama, pempetisyen menyeru kerajaan untuk meletakkan lebihan terkumpul dalam akaun insurans pekerjaan kembali ke dalam poket penganggur dengan membatalkan peraturan kelayakan semasa untuk pendatang baharu dan menggunakan lebihan untuk latihan bagi penganggur, sekali gus menggalakkan pekerjaan langsung. .

Dalam yang pertama, pempetisyen menyeru kerajaan untuk meletakkan lebihan terkumpul dalam akaun insurans pekerjaan kembali ke dalam poket wanita.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I remind the Leader of the Opposition to go back and read Hansard because I specifically stated that we are continuing to target resources, reducing taxes, paying down public debt and investing in the knowledge of people and safeguarding and improving our health care system.

Hypothesis: Taxes are a target and resources are being reduced.

It's incorrect as the resources are targeted and taxes are lowered, not the opposite, which makes it incorrect. Agent found since the words were closely together, it saw as correct.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingatkan kepada Ketua Pembangkang supaya kembali membaca Hansard kerana saya secara khusus menyatakan bahawa kita terus menyasarkan sumber, mengurangkan cukai, membayar hutang awam dan melabur dalam pengetahuan orang ramai dan menjaga serta meningkatkan penjagaan kesihatan kita. sistem.

Cukai adalah sasaran dan sumber sedang dikurangkan.


Premise: It was sometime in 2004. It was prior to the June meetings because my husband was a teacher at the school, so I often heard things that he would come home and tell me. So I knew that there was some discussion over the biology book, so sometime before that. I can't tell you exactly when.

Hypothesis: This even happened in 2005 sometime before June.

This is incorrect because the first statement clearly says that it happened in 2004 not 2005.

Ia adalah pada tahun 2004. Ia sebelum mesyuarat Jun kerana suami saya seorang guru di sekolah, jadi saya sering mendengar perkara yang dia akan pulang dan memberitahu saya. Jadi saya tahu bahawa terdapat beberapa perbincangan mengenai buku biologi, jadi kadang-kadang sebelum itu. Saya tidak boleh memberitahu anda dengan tepat bila.

Ini juga berlaku pada tahun 2005 sebelum Jun.


Premise: I have said it before, and I will say it again-because this cannot be overemphasized-if people have to wait for a week, two weeks or a very long time before an operation, it is not because of the physician or the hospital, but because the hospital is starved of resources and, as a result, the level of services has dropped.

Hypothesis: People are waiting a long time for an operation but the hospital is hording resources.

it is incorrect because the hospital is starving of resources but the AI marked it correct because the part about people waiting a long time for an operation is true.

Saya telah mengatakannya sebelum ini, dan saya akan mengatakannya sekali lagi-kerana ini tidak boleh terlalu ditekankan-jika orang terpaksa menunggu selama seminggu, dua minggu atau masa yang sangat lama sebelum pembedahan, itu bukan kerana doktor atau hospital, tetapi kerana hospital kebuluran sumber dan, akibatnya, tahap perkhidmatan telah menurun.

Orang ramai menunggu masa yang lama untuk pembedahan tetapi hospital menyorok sumber.


Premise: The coalition against Saddam has fallen apart or it's unraveling, let's put it that way. The sanctions are being violated. We don't know whether he's developing weapons of mass destruction. He better not be or there's going to be a consequence should I be the president.

Hypothesis: Saddam isn’t supposed to have any sanctions

I used the sentence by the speaker backwards

Gabungan menentang Saddam telah berantakan atau sudah terungkai, biarlah begitu. Sekatan dilanggar. Kami tidak tahu sama ada dia sedang membangunkan senjata pemusnah besar-besaran. Dia lebih baik tidak menjadi atau akan ada akibat sekiranya saya menjadi presiden.

Saddam tidak sepatutnya mempunyai sebarang sekatan


Premise: In this case when you murder somebody it's hate, Jim. The crime is hate. And they got the ultimate punishment. I'm not exactly sure how you enhance the penalty any more than the death penalty. We happen to have a statute on the books that's a hate crimes statute in Texas.

Hypothesis: Hate is the ultimate punishment, according to the speaker.

The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. The wording 'The crime is hate. And they got the ultimate punishment' confused the model.

Dalam kes ini apabila anda membunuh seseorang, itu adalah kebencian, Jim. Jenayahnya ialah kebencian. Dan mereka mendapat hukuman terakhir. Saya tidak pasti bagaimana anda meningkatkan hukuman lebih daripada hukuman mati. Kami kebetulan mempunyai statut pada buku yang merupakan statut jenayah benci di Texas.

Kebencian adalah hukuman terakhir, menurut penceramah.


Premise: Towards Pollution Prevention'', the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development recommended that the federal government take action under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to regulate lead sinkers and jigs by prohibiting the import, sale, manufacture and use of lead sinkers and jigs by May 31, 1997.

Hypothesis: The regulation deadline for prohibiting the import, sale, manufacture and use of lead sinkers and jigs happened over 30 years ago.

The regulation deadline was in 1997, which is 22 years ago. The system maybe doesn't understand dates and times.

Ke Arah Pencegahan Pencemaran'', Jawatankuasa Tetap Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan Mampan mengesyorkan agar kerajaan persekutuan mengambil tindakan di bawah Akta Perlindungan Alam Sekitar Kanada untuk mengawal selia penenggelam dan jig plumbum dengan melarang pengimportan, penjualan, pembuatan dan penggunaan penyerap dan jig plumbum oleh 31 Mei 1997.

Tarikh akhir peraturan untuk melarang import, penjualan, pembuatan dan penggunaan bejana dan jig plumbum berlaku lebih 30 tahun lalu.


Premise: Our concern with the budget is not only its failure to acknowledge that, but that it actually worsens the situation by not dealing with unemployment, by not dealing with wage inequities, by not dealing with homelessness, by not dealing with poverty and by not dealing with deplorable living conditions on and off reserves in the country.

Hypothesis: the situation gets worse by dealing with unemployment

its incorrect because "but that it actually worsens the situation by not dealing with unemployment," so dealing will improve

Kebimbangan kita terhadap bajet bukan sahaja kegagalannya untuk mengakuinya, tetapi ia sebenarnya memburukkan keadaan dengan tidak menangani pengangguran, dengan tidak menangani ketidaksamaan gaji, dengan tidak menangani gelandangan, dengan tidak menangani kemiskinan dan dengan tidak menangani keadaan hidup yang menyedihkan di dalam dan di luar rizab di negara ini.

keadaan menjadi lebih buruk dengan menangani pengangguran


Premise: Yes. Because my husband and I had left early -- we had our infant with us and he needed to get home -- we had heard that there were comments that were said after we left about teachers should be fired if they don't listen to the school board's directive. And we wanted to hear that for ourselves, so my husband had previously requested the tapes and then at that meeting he stood again to request the tapes. In addition, Barrie Callahan had stood to request the tapes at that meeting, as well.

Hypothesis: The infant is female

It states that they had their infant with them and "he" needed to get home. (it's possible that it was referring to the husband but seems as though it means the child)

ya. Kerana saya dan suami saya telah pergi awal -- kami membawa bayi kami dan dia perlu pulang -- kami telah mendengar bahawa terdapat komen yang dikatakan selepas kami keluar tentang guru harus dipecat jika mereka tidak mendengar arahan lembaga sekolah. Dan kami mahu mendengarnya sendiri, jadi suami saya sebelum ini telah meminta pita itu dan kemudian pada mesyuarat itu dia berdiri semula untuk meminta pita itu. Di samping itu, Barrie Callahan telah berdiri untuk meminta pita pada mesyuarat itu juga.


Premise: All right. It's admitted subject to the defendants' objection. P60 is the letter from School Board Member Geesey to the editor again. I think I noted that it was admitted. Over the objection already of the defendants, we'll reaffirm that, but you can make any other objections you want to on the record, but I think that was thoroughly argued at that time.

Hypothesis: School Board Member Geesey has a xx

Baiklah. Ia diakui tertakluk kepada bantahan defendan. P60 ialah surat daripada Ahli Lembaga Pengarah Sekolah Geesey kepada editor sekali lagi. Saya fikir saya perhatikan bahawa ia telah diterima. Mengenai bantahan defendan, kami akan mengesahkannya semula, tetapi anda boleh membuat sebarang bantahan lain yang anda mahukan dalam rekod, tetapi saya fikir ia telah dihujahkan secara menyeluruh pada masa itu.

Ahli Lembaga Pengarah Sekolah Geesey mempunyai xx


Premise: And finally, I do believe in tax relief. I believe we can set our priorities. I don't believe, like the vice president does, in huge government. I believe in limited government. By having a limited government and a focused government, we can send some of the money back to the people who pay the bills.

Hypothesis: I think limited government is more expensive

The context says he believes a limited government can send money back to the people, so it is definitely incorrect to say he believes limited government is more expensive

Dan akhirnya, saya percaya pada pelepasan cukai. Saya percaya kita boleh menetapkan keutamaan kita. Saya tidak percaya, seperti timbalan presiden, dalam kerajaan besar. Saya percaya kerajaan terhad. Dengan mempunyai kerajaan yang terhad dan kerajaan yang fokus, kami boleh menghantar sebahagian wang itu kembali kepada orang yang membayar bil.


Premise: And not only the training in police procedures, but human relations. And I think that racial profiling is part of a larger issue of how we deal with race in America. And as for singling people out because of race, you know, James Byrd was singled out because of his race in Texas.

Hypothesis: Training in police procedures leads to racial profiling.

Racial profiling is a problem for America overall, and is not specific to police training. Lack of proper training may lead it to occur but it is not a central component of the training overall.

Dan bukan sahaja latihan dalam prosedur polis, tetapi hubungan manusia. Dan saya berpendapat bahawa profil kaum adalah sebahagian daripada isu yang lebih besar tentang cara kita menangani kaum di Amerika. Dan untuk menyisih orang kerana bangsa, anda tahu, James Byrd telah dipilih kerana bangsanya di Texas.

Latihan dalam prosedur polis membawa kepada profil kaum.


Premise: The memorial stands as a symbol of healing for the Armenian community and will be a lasting tribute to all victims of ethnic hatred, including the Armenian genocide of 1915 at the hands of the Turkish government, the first genocide of the century but not the last as tragically ethnic massacres continue to take place every day.

Hypothesis: The turks are accused of innocence.

They are accused of genocide, not innocence.

Memorial itu berdiri sebagai simbol penyembuhan bagi masyarakat Armenia dan akan menjadi penghormatan yang berkekalan kepada semua mangsa kebencian etnik, termasuk pembunuhan beramai-ramai Armenia pada 1915 di tangan kerajaan Turki, pembunuhan beramai-ramai pertama abad ini tetapi bukan yang terakhir sebagai tragisnya pembunuhan beramai-ramai etnik terus berlaku setiap hari.


Premise: All right. Before we start the cross-examination, I think this will be an appropriate time for our afternoon break. We'll take that break for approximately 20 minutes, no longer than that, and we will return with Mr. Muise's cross-examination of the witness. We'll be in recess. (Recess taken.)

Hypothesis: The cross-examination will end with a recess

The examination will not end with a recess, it will continue afterwards.

Baiklah. Sebelum kita memulakan peperiksaan balas, saya rasa ini adalah masa yang sesuai untuk rehat tengah hari kita. Kami akan berehat selama kira-kira 20 minit, tidak lebih daripada itu, dan kami akan kembali dengan pemeriksaan balas En. Muise terhadap saksi. Kami akan berehat. (Rehat diambil.)

Peperiksaan balas akan berakhir dengan rehat


Premise: On the hog environmental management strategy, for example, the Canadian government has put $2 million in that program along with $1 million from the industry itself to assist the industry to find ways the nutrients from hog operations in Canada can be best managed in the rural areas.

Hypothesis: The Canadian government has put 3 million dollars into the hog environmental management strategy.

The statement says that the Canadian government put 2 million into the strategy, not 3 million so therefore my statement is incorrect.

Mengenai strategi pengurusan alam sekitar babi, sebagai contoh, kerajaan Kanada telah meletakkan $2 juta dalam program itu bersama-sama dengan $1 juta daripada industri itu sendiri untuk membantu industri mencari cara nutrien daripada operasi babi di Kanada boleh diuruskan dengan terbaik di kawasan luar bandar. .

Kerajaan Kanada telah meletakkan 3 juta dolar ke dalam strategi pengurusan alam sekitar babi.


Premise: That debate will go on at another time when we talk of serious offences like murder because Liberal legislation or the lack thereof allows convicted murderers and rapists, the Clifford Olsons and the Paul Bernardos of the country, after being sentenced to life in prison to put their victims through the trauma of a hearing after 15 years.

Hypothesis: More people should be like Clifford Olson

Clifford Olson obviously committed a heinous crime, seems to be either murder or rape or both. There is no way anyone would want more people to be like him.

Perdebatan itu akan diteruskan pada masa lain apabila kita bercakap tentang kesalahan serius seperti pembunuhan kerana undang-undang Liberal atau kekurangannya membenarkan pembunuh dan perogol yang disabitkan kesalahan, Clifford Olsons dan Paul Bernardos dari negara itu, selepas dijatuhi hukuman penjara seumur hidup untuk meletakkan mereka. mangsa melalui trauma pendengaran selepas 15 tahun.

Lebih ramai orang sepatutnya menjadi seperti Clifford Olson


Premise: The key is of course in the words of section 93 which are rooted in 19th century history and, to some extent of course, in 18th century history because that is where these particular provisions flowed from, the capitulations of 1759, the Treaty of Paris of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774.

Hypothesis: Section 93 is rooted in the Treaty of Quebec of 1763 and the Paris Act of 1774.

I switched Treaty of Paris and Quebec Act for Treaty of Quebec and Paris Act.

Kuncinya tentu saja dalam kata-kata seksyen 93 yang berakar umbi dalam sejarah abad ke-19 dan, pada tahap tertentu tentu saja, dalam sejarah abad ke-18 kerana dari situlah peruntukan-peruntukan khusus ini mengalir dari, kapitulasi 1759, Perjanjian Paris tentang 1763 dan Akta Quebec 1774.

Seksyen 93 berakar umbi dalam Perjanjian Quebec 1763 dan Akta Paris 1774.