Premise: How to buy a portable dishwasher<br>Determine if portable is better than permanent. You are a good candidate for a portable dishwasher if you are renting and unable to renovate the kitchen, or if you lack the space to fit a built-in dishwasher. [substeps] Be sure you are willing to put effort into using your portable dishwasher.

Hypothesis: Buy a portable if you can put in the effort to install.

Cara membeli mesin basuh pinggan mangkuk mudah alih<br>Tentukan sama ada mudah alih lebih baik daripada kekal. Anda adalah calon yang baik untuk mesin basuh pinggan mangkuk mudah alih jika anda menyewa dan tidak dapat mengubah suai dapur, atau jika anda kekurangan ruang untuk memuatkan mesin basuh pinggan mangkuk terbina dalam. [sublangkah] Pastikan anda bersedia untuk menggunakan mesin basuh pinggan mangkuk mudah alih anda.

Beli mudah alih jika anda boleh berusaha untuk memasang.


Premise: How to spruce up the interior of your older car<br>Throw away any trash that is hidden within your car. Check under seats, in the pockets and glove compartment and in the cup holders. Set aside any extraneous things, such as car kits, cds and manuals before you start to clean.

Hypothesis: Throw away any trash that is hidden like car kits, cds and manuals.

It gets confused when partials of two sentences are connected.

Cara merapikan bahagian dalam kereta lama anda<br>Buang sebarang sampah yang tersembunyi di dalam kereta anda. Periksa di bawah tempat duduk, di dalam poket dan petak sarung tangan dan di dalam pemegang cawan. Ketepikan apa-apa perkara tambahan, seperti kit kereta, cd dan manual sebelum anda mula membersihkan.

Buang apa-apa sampah yang tersembunyi seperti kit kereta, cd dan manual.


Premise: How to cut laminate<br>Measure the installation area and purchase the laminate. Carefully measure the space with a tape measure, then measure it once more for the sake of accuracy. Add one inch to all sides, just in case chipping or splitting occurs when you make your cuts.

Hypothesis: tape contains a xx

Cara memotong lamina<br>Ukur kawasan pemasangan dan beli lamina. Berhati-hati mengukur ruang dengan pita pengukur, kemudian ukur sekali lagi demi ketepatan. Tambahkan satu inci pada semua sisi, sekiranya berlaku cipratan atau belahan apabila anda membuat potongan.


Premise: And we have a fundamental choice to make. Are we going to step up to the plate as a nation the way we did after World War II, the way that generation of heroes said okay, the United States is going to be the leader. And the world benefitted tremendously from the courage that they showed in those post-war years.

Hypothesis: The 1950s generation stepped up to the plate.

I used dates instead of an event marker.

Dan kita mempunyai pilihan asas untuk dibuat. Adakah kita akan meningkatkan tahap sebagai sebuah negara seperti yang kita lakukan selepas Perang Dunia II, dengan cara generasi wira itu berkata okey, Amerika Syarikat akan menjadi pemimpin. Dan dunia mendapat manfaat yang besar daripada keberanian yang mereka tunjukkan pada tahun-tahun selepas perang itu.


Premise: But I was as clear as I could possibly be that what is at issue here would be, for example, the particular events that the reporters wrote about and questions such as -- simple questions, did they attend the meeting, did they hear them say the comments, did they write the story immediately after, did they take notes at the time of the meeting.

Hypothesis: The speaker could not have been clearer according to them

The first sentence the speaker says is that they were as clear as they could have been, in their view. So, the speaker couldn't have been clearer according to what they think. The system had a difficult time because it doesn't recognize the speaker as the person talking in the prompt.

Tetapi saya sejelas mungkin bahawa perkara yang menjadi isu di sini adalah, sebagai contoh, peristiwa tertentu yang ditulis oleh wartawan dan soalan seperti -- soalan mudah, adakah mereka menghadiri mesyuarat itu, adakah mereka mendengar mereka berkata komen, adakah mereka menulis cerita sejurus selepas itu, adakah mereka mengambil nota pada masa mesyuarat.

Penceramah tidak mungkin lebih jelas menurut mereka


Premise: I think credibility is going to be very important in the future in the Middle East. I want everybody to know should I be the president Israel's going to be our friend. I'm going to stand by Israel. Secondly, that I think it's important to reach out to moderate Arab nations, like Jordan and Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Hypothesis: The speaker mentions more than 3 moderate Arab nations.

It's definitely correct because he specifically mentions 4 moderate Arab nations, which is of course more than 3. It's difficult because perhaps the system is not sure what counts as a moderate Arab nation.

Saya fikir kredibiliti akan menjadi sangat penting pada masa depan di Timur Tengah. Saya mahu semua orang tahu sekiranya saya menjadi presiden Israel akan menjadi kawan kita. Saya akan berdiri di sisi Israel. Kedua, saya fikir adalah penting untuk menjangkau negara Arab yang sederhana, seperti Jordan dan Mesir, Arab Saudi dan Kuwait.

Penceramah menyebut lebih daripada 3 negara Arab sederhana.


Premise: If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us. If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us. And it's -- our nation stands alone right now in the world in terms of power, and that's why we have to be humble. And yet project strength in a way that promotes freedom.

Hypothesis: This person identifies with the nation he's talking about

The person uses words like "us" "our" and "we." This indicates that they identify with that nation. The system may not understand that correlation.

Jika kita bangsa yang sombong, mereka akan marah kita. Jika kita bangsa yang rendah hati, tetapi kuat, mereka akan menyambut kita. Dan ia -- negara kita berdiri sendiri sekarang di dunia dari segi kuasa, dan itulah sebabnya kita perlu merendah diri. Namun mengunjurkan kekuatan dengan cara yang menggalakkan kebebasan.

Orang ini mengenal pasti dengan negara yang dia maksudkan


Premise: New question to you, Senator Kerry, two minutes. And it's still on jobs. You know, many experts say that a president really doesn't have much control over jobs. For example, if someone invents a machine that does the work of five people, that's progress. That's not the president's fault.

Hypothesis: Senator Kerry contains no q

Soalan baru kepada anda, Senator Kerry, dua minit. Dan ia masih dalam kerja. Anda tahu, ramai pakar mengatakan bahawa seorang presiden benar-benar tidak mempunyai banyak kawalan ke atas pekerjaan. Sebagai contoh, jika seseorang mencipta mesin yang melakukan kerja lima orang, itu kemajuan. Itu bukan salah presiden.


Premise: Mr. Lessig, I'll tell you what bothers me about your position, and that is that Congress has extended the term so often through the years, and if you are right, don't we run the risk of upsetting previous extensions of time? I mean, this seems to be a practice that began with the very first act.

Hypothesis: Mr. Lessig is a man.

The fact that they used the term Mr. indicates that Lessig is either a man or identifies as a man. I'm not sure why the system missed this one.

Encik Lessig, saya akan memberitahu anda apa yang mengganggu saya tentang kedudukan anda, dan itu adalah bahawa Kongres telah memanjangkan penggal begitu kerap selama bertahun-tahun, dan jika anda betul, tidakkah kita menghadapi risiko mengganggu lanjutan masa sebelumnya ? Maksud saya, ini nampaknya satu amalan yang bermula dengan perbuatan pertama.


Premise: But you can't say when you walk into a classroom, you're not teaching. And if that's what's happening in the Dover school system and my children are in that school system, that they're routinely establishing practices that is not teaching in the classroom, then that's shameful.

Hypothesis: The narrator is dissatisfied with the Dover schools.

The narrator says negative things about the school system, but doesn't come right out and say they are dissatisfied.

Tetapi anda tidak boleh mengatakan apabila anda masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, anda tidak mengajar. Dan jika itu yang berlaku dalam sistem sekolah Dover dan anak-anak saya berada dalam sistem sekolah itu, bahawa mereka secara rutin mewujudkan amalan yang tidak mengajar di dalam bilik darjah, maka itu memalukan.

Pencerita tidak berpuas hati dengan sekolah Dover.


Premise: This new paragraph clarifies for organizations the circumstances under which they may accede at their discretion to the legitimate requests of government institutions for personal information, for national security, law enforcement and administrative purposes where they have lawful authority.

Hypothesis: Organizations can often decide for themselves whether they would like to share personal information with government institutions.

The context states that the paragraph will talk about circumstances in which organizations "may accede at their discretion", which means that they can decide for themselves whether they would like to share the personal information.

Perenggan baharu ini menjelaskan kepada organisasi keadaan di mana mereka boleh bersetuju mengikut budi bicara mereka kepada permintaan sah institusi kerajaan untuk maklumat peribadi, untuk keselamatan negara, penguatkuasaan undang-undang dan tujuan pentadbiran di mana mereka mempunyai kuasa yang sah.

Organisasi selalunya boleh memutuskan sendiri sama ada mereka ingin berkongsi maklumat peribadi dengan institusi kerajaan.


Premise: Yes, it does. Take, for example, Third World debt. I think we ought to be forgiving Third World debt under certain conditions. I think, for example, if we're convinced that a Third World country that's got a lot of debt would reform itself, that the money wouldn't go into the hands of a few but would go to help people, I think it makes sense for us to use our wealth in that way, or to trade debt for valuable rain forest lands, makes that much sense, yes.

Hypothesis: we should not try to gain back money from very poor countries who owe us

Ya, memang begitu. Ambil, sebagai contoh, hutang Dunia Ketiga. Saya fikir kita sepatutnya memaafkan hutang Dunia Ketiga dalam keadaan tertentu. Saya fikir, sebagai contoh, jika kita yakin bahawa negara Dunia Ketiga yang mempunyai banyak hutang akan melakukan pembaharuan sendiri, bahawa wang itu tidak akan jatuh ke tangan segelintir orang tetapi akan pergi untuk membantu orang ramai, saya fikir ia menghasilkan wajar untuk kita menggunakan kekayaan kita dengan cara itu, atau untuk menukar hutang untuk tanah hutan hujan yang berharga, sangat masuk akal, ya.

kita tidak seharusnya cuba mendapatkan kembali wang daripada negara yang sangat miskin yang berhutang kepada kita


Premise: That is why we intend to move an amendment which would ask the government to go beyond the initial motion and give some indication of whether or not the Liberals would have the fortitude on behalf of the Canadian people to not be a party to any international agreement which in future was found to compel us to export freshwater in bulk against our will.

Hypothesis: Canadians don't want to be forced to export their fresh water.

"Canadian people to not be a party to any international agreement which in future was found to compel us to export freshwater in bulk against our will." which means they don't want to be forced

Itulah sebabnya kami berhasrat untuk menggerakkan pindaan yang akan meminta kerajaan untuk melangkaui usul awal dan memberikan beberapa petunjuk sama ada Liberal akan mempunyai ketabahan bagi pihak rakyat Kanada untuk tidak menjadi pihak kepada mana-mana perjanjian antarabangsa yang pada masa hadapan didapati memaksa kami untuk mengeksport air tawar secara pukal di luar kehendak kami.

Orang Kanada tidak mahu dipaksa untuk mengeksport air tawar mereka.


Premise: But from the reporters' perspective, were they at the meeting. The obvious answer is yes, but they haven't answered that under oath. Did they hear the statement that is included in the article? Perhaps where were they standing in the room, did they utilize a tape recorder for the purpose of taking down the statement or did they use a tape recorder and did they take notes contemporaneously with the statement.

Hypothesis: They have not touched the bible in court

Tetapi dari perspektif wartawan, adakah mereka berada di mesyuarat itu. Jawapan yang jelas ialah ya, tetapi mereka tidak menjawabnya dengan bersumpah. Adakah mereka mendengar kenyataan yang dimuatkan dalam artikel itu? Mungkin di mana mereka berdiri di dalam bilik itu, adakah mereka menggunakan perakam pita untuk tujuan menurunkan kenyataan atau adakah mereka menggunakan perakam pita dan adakah mereka mencatat nota serentak dengan kenyataan itu.

Mereka tidak menyentuh bible di mahkamah


Premise: One of the criteria that I think is important in deciding when and if we should ever get involved around the world is whether or not our national security interest is involved, if we can really make the difference with military forces. We tried everything else.

Hypothesis: They dont support military use in every case

Salah satu kriteria yang saya fikir penting dalam menentukan bila dan jika kita perlu terlibat di seluruh dunia ialah sama ada kepentingan keselamatan negara kita terlibat atau tidak, jika kita benar-benar boleh membuat perbezaan dengan pasukan tentera. Kami mencuba segala-galanya.

Mereka tidak menyokong penggunaan ketenteraan dalam setiap kes


Premise: I have said it before, and I will say it again-because this cannot be overemphasized-if people have to wait for a week, two weeks or a very long time before an operation, it is not because of the physician or the hospital, but because the hospital is starved of resources and, as a result, the level of services has dropped.

Hypothesis: Starving hospitals of resources is something that can be done.

The statement says "because the hospital is starved of resources" therefore saying "Starving hospitals of resources is something that can be done" is definitely correct.

Saya telah mengatakannya sebelum ini, dan saya akan mengatakannya sekali lagi-kerana ini tidak boleh terlalu ditekankan-jika orang terpaksa menunggu selama seminggu, dua minggu atau masa yang sangat lama sebelum pembedahan, itu bukan kerana doktor atau hospital, tetapi kerana hospital kebuluran sumber dan, akibatnya, tahap perkhidmatan telah menurun.

Hospital kelaparan sumber adalah sesuatu yang boleh dilakukan.


Premise: That, I take it, is a harm. Their works have already been created. Harm number 2. The fact that people, for the 99 percent of the copyrights that have no commercial value after 70 years, have to find the copyright holder to put them in databases. The cost of that, on my numbers in here, made up, at least a billion dollars, or they can't find the people at all and get permission, an innumerable cost, un -- valuable cost to people who want to use it.

Hypothesis: copyrights causes economic harms overall

Itu, saya fikir, adalah satu kemudaratan. Karya mereka telah pun dibuat. Kemudaratan nombor 2. Hakikat bahawa orang ramai, bagi 99 peratus hak cipta yang tidak mempunyai nilai komersial selepas 70 tahun, perlu mencari pemegang hak cipta untuk meletakkannya dalam pangkalan data. Kos itu, pada nombor saya di sini, dibuat, sekurang-kurangnya satu bilion dolar, atau mereka tidak dapat mencari orang itu sama sekali dan mendapat kebenaran, kos yang tidak terkira, tidak -- kos yang berharga kepada orang yang ingin menggunakannya .

hak cipta menyebabkan kemudaratan ekonomi secara keseluruhan


Premise: I do. I think that in this 21st century we will soon see the consequences of what's called global warming. There was a study just a few weeks ago suggesting that in summertime the north polar ice cap will be completely gone in 50 years. Already people see the strange weather conditions that the old timers say they've never seen before in their lifetimes.

Hypothesis: The speaker think that global warming is harmful.

The speaker talks about the consequences of global warming so it is a bad thing.

Saya sudi. Saya berpendapat bahawa dalam abad ke-21 ini kita akan melihat akibat daripada apa yang dipanggil pemanasan global. Terdapat satu kajian hanya beberapa minggu yang lalu mencadangkan bahawa pada musim panas penutup ais kutub utara akan hilang sepenuhnya dalam 50 tahun. Sudah orang melihat keadaan cuaca pelik yang dikatakan oleh pemasa lama yang tidak pernah mereka lihat sebelum ini sepanjang hayat mereka.

Penceramah berpendapat bahawa pemanasan global adalah berbahaya.


Premise: I would like to take this opportunity to say that while we have been fortunate enough not to be involved in a major war for many, many years now and in fact for some decades, we do not forget the fact that many of those serving in our armed forces are serving in very troubled hot spots around the world.

Hypothesis: We have not been involved in a war for at least 10 years.

"we have been fortunate enough not to be involved in amajor war for many, many years now and in fact for some decades."  A decade is 10 years.

Saya ingin mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengatakan bahawa walaupun kita cukup bernasib baik kerana tidak terlibat dalam perang besar selama bertahun-tahun sekarang dan sebenarnya selama beberapa dekad, kita tidak melupakan hakikat bahawa ramai daripada mereka yang berkhidmat di negara kita. angkatan tentera sedang berkhidmat di kawasan panas yang sangat bermasalah di seluruh dunia.

Kami tidak terlibat dalam peperangan selama sekurang-kurangnya 10 tahun.


Premise: New question, new subject. Vice President Gore, on the environment. In your 1992 book you said, quote, "We must make the rescue of our environment the central organizing principle for civilization and there must be a wrenching transformation to save the planet." Do you still feel that way?

Hypothesis: the question is being asked to al gore

Soalan baru, subjek baru. Naib Presiden Gore, mengenai alam sekitar. Dalam buku anda pada tahun 1992, anda berkata, petikan, "Kita mesti menjadikan penyelamatan alam sekitar kita sebagai prinsip penganjuran utama bagi tamadun dan mesti ada transformasi yang menyayat hati untuk menyelamatkan planet ini." Adakah anda masih berasa begitu?


Yes, yes. But it's not a statement about his heart. I don't claim to know his heart. I think he's a good person. I make no allegations about that. I believe him when he says that he has a good heart. I know enough about your story to admire a lot of the things that you have done as a person. The man is confused, he claims this statement is not about the heart but than refers to the heart later in his sentence.

Ya, ya. Tetapi ia bukan kenyataan tentang hatinya. Saya tidak mengaku tahu hati dia. Saya rasa dia seorang yang baik. Saya tidak membuat dakwaan tentang itu. Saya percaya dia apabila dia berkata bahawa dia mempunyai hati yang baik. Saya cukup tahu tentang kisah anda untuk mengagumi banyak perkara yang telah anda lakukan sebagai seorang manusia.

Lelaki itu keliru, dia mendakwa kenyataan ini bukan tentang hati tetapi merujuk kepada hati nanti dalam ayatnya.


Premise: And when I roll it back and we invest in the things that I have talked about to move our economy, we're going to grow sufficiently, it would begin to cut the deficit in half, and we get back to where we were at the end of the 1990s when we balanced the budget and paid down the debt of this country.

Hypothesis: The economy was good in the 90s

Dan apabila saya melancarkannya semula dan kita melabur dalam perkara-perkara yang telah saya bincangkan untuk menggerakkan ekonomi kita, kita akan berkembang dengan mencukupi, ia akan mula mengurangkan defisit kepada separuh, dan kita kembali ke tempat kita berada pada tahap itu. penghujung tahun 1990-an apabila kita mengimbangi bajet dan membayar hutang negara ini.


Premise: In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Hypothesis: The agreed on change was not between the Coastal Fisheries dept and Navigable Waters dept.

Actually, the change was agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and 'the department' -- this ambiguity and multiple mentioned entities fooled the model.

Dalam kes ini, perubahan yang dipersetujui antara Jabatan Warisan Kanada dan jabatan berkenaan mengambil keutamaan berbanding peraturan lain di bawah Akta Perikanan, Akta Perlindungan Perikanan Pantai, Akta Perkapalan Kanada, Akta Pencegahan Pencemaran Perairan Artik, Perlindungan Perairan Boleh Dilayari. Akta atau Akta Aeronautik.

Perubahan yang dipersetujui bukan antara jabatan Perikanan Pantai dan jabatan Perairan Boleh Pelayaran.


Premise: The only prevailing rule is that no single response can ever, ever exceed two minutes. The prevailing rule for the audience here in the hall is as always, absolute quiet, please. Good evening, Governor Bush, Vice President Gore. The end of our 90 minutes last week in Boston, the total time each of you took was virtually the same.

Hypothesis: Gore can talk words

Satu-satunya peraturan yang berlaku ialah tiada satu pun respons boleh melebihi dua minit. Peraturan lazim untuk penonton di sini di dewan adalah seperti biasa, sila senyap. Selamat malam, Gabenor Bush, Naib Presiden Gore. Penghujung 90 minit minggu lalu kami di Boston, jumlah masa yang anda ambil adalah hampir sama.


Premise: The petitioners would like to bring to the attention of the House that managing the family home and caring for preschool children is an honourable profession which has not been recognized for its value to our society and that the Income Tax Act discriminates against families who choose to provide care in the home to preschool children.

Hypothesis: typically "feminine roles" within a family are discriminated against by federal legislature

it fits because I just made the claims more general, so that the program was not able to recognize the wording

Pempetisyen ingin memberi perhatian kepada Dewan bahawa mengurus rumah keluarga dan menjaga kanak-kanak prasekolah adalah satu profesion terhormat yang tidak diiktiraf nilainya kepada masyarakat kita dan bahawa Akta Cukai Pendapatan mendiskriminasi keluarga yang memilih untuk menyediakan penjagaan di rumah kepada kanak-kanak prasekolah.

lazimnya "peranan wanita" dalam keluarga didiskriminasi oleh badan perundangan persekutuan


Premise: Justice, we are not making an empirical claim at all. Nothing in our Copyright Clause claim hangs upon the empirical assertion about impeding progress. Our only argument is, this is a structural limit necessary to assure that what would be an effectively perpetual term not be permitted under the copyright laws.

Hypothesis: this is a (related to what holds something together and makes it strong) limit necessary to promise to that what would be an effectively constant (forever) term not be permitted under the copyright laws.

It was confused by the simplicity of redefining common law terms.

Keadilan, kami tidak membuat tuntutan empirikal sama sekali. Tiada apa-apa dalam tuntutan Klausa Hak Cipta kami bergantung pada penegasan empirikal tentang menghalang kemajuan. Satu-satunya hujah kami ialah, ini adalah had struktur yang diperlukan untuk memastikan bahawa apa yang akan menjadi istilah yang berkekalan secara berkesan tidak dibenarkan di bawah undang-undang hak cipta.

ini adalah had (berkaitan dengan apa yang menyatukan sesuatu dan menjadikannya kuat) untuk menjanjikan bahawa apa yang menjadi istilah tetap (selama-lamanya) secara berkesan tidak dibenarkan di bawah undang-undang hak cipta.


Premise: Mrs. Smith, I'm going to hand you what purports to be your deposition that was taken by Patrick Gillen. I would like you to direct your attention to Page 13, and I would like you to read out loud the question that you are asked starting with Line 18 and all the way down through that page and then going on to the next page, Page 14, and reading from Line 1 through Line 4. And please read it out loud.

Hypothesis: The deposition is not 13 pages long.

The deposition has a page 13 AND 14, so it is at least 14 pages long. The model was confused by 'page 13' in the text.

Puan Smith, saya akan menyerahkan kepada anda apa yang dikatakan sebagai pemendapan anda yang telah diambil oleh Patrick Gillen. Saya ingin anda menumpukan perhatian anda kepada Halaman 13, dan saya ingin anda membaca dengan kuat soalan yang anda ditanya bermula dengan Baris 18 dan sehingga ke bawah halaman itu dan kemudian pergi ke halaman seterusnya, Halaman 14 , dan membaca dari Baris 1 hingga Baris 4. Dan sila baca dengan kuat.


Premise: But there has to be a limit, as you acknowledge. Perpetual copyright is not permitted. Who is the judge of -- within that line? Who is the judge of when it becomes unlimited? Is there, in other words, judicial review and, if there is, what standard would this Court apply to determine whether something short of perpetual is still unlimited?

Hypothesis: Copyrights aren't intended to be ceaseless.

If  perpetual copyrights aren't permitted as the context states, then it follows that the intention isn't for them to be ceaseless.  I don't think the AI understood ceaseless.

Tetapi mesti ada had, seperti yang anda akui. Hak cipta kekal tidak dibenarkan. Siapa hakim -- dalam baris itu? Siapa yang menjadi hakim apabila ia menjadi tidak terhad? Adakah, dengan kata lain, semakan kehakiman dan, jika ada, apakah piawaian yang akan digunakan oleh Mahkamah ini untuk menentukan sama ada sesuatu yang tidak berkekalan masih tidak terhad?


Premise: He declared the need for a new tax cut for the oil companies in Texas an emergency need, and so the money was taken away from the CHIP program. There's -- you don't have to take my word for this. There is now a federal judge's opinion about the current management of this program ordering the State of Texas to do -- you should read that judge's language about this.

Hypothesis: Oil companies in Texas would pay less in taxes if the tax cut happens

It is correct because a tax cut means paying less in taxes. It means taxes are being cut, so companies would pay less in taxes. It says this is targeting oil companies, so they would pay less in taxes. I don't think the system understands tax cuts.

Dia mengisytiharkan keperluan untuk pemotongan cukai baru untuk syarikat minyak di Texas sebagai keperluan kecemasan, dan oleh itu wang itu telah diambil dari program CHIP. Ada -- anda tidak perlu mengambil kata-kata saya untuk ini. Kini terdapat pendapat hakim persekutuan tentang pengurusan semasa program ini yang memerintahkan Negeri Texas melakukannya -- anda harus membaca bahasa hakim itu tentang perkara ini.

Syarikat minyak di Texas akan membayar lebih sedikit cukai jika pemotongan cukai berlaku


Premise: The Canadian opportunities strategy includes Canadian millennium scholarships averaging $3,000 a year up to $15,000 in total for four years; Canada study grants averaging $2,225 per year to help students with the greatest need; support for advanced research as detailed earlier; and tax relief for interest on student loans in the Canada student loan interest relief.

Hypothesis: Canada is trying to make it affordable for everyone to attend collage.

scholarships and grants for students are making it affordable to attend college so it is correct that Canada is trying to help more people afford college.

Strategi peluang Kanada termasuk biasiswa milenium Kanada dengan purata $3,000 setahun sehingga $15,000 secara keseluruhan selama empat tahun; Geran pengajian Kanada purata $2,225 setahun untuk membantu pelajar dengan keperluan terbesar; sokongan untuk penyelidikan lanjutan seperti yang diperincikan sebelum ini; dan pelepasan cukai untuk faedah pinjaman pelajar dalam pelepasan faedah pinjaman pelajar Kanada.

Kanada cuba menjadikannya mampu untuk semua orang menghadiri kolej.


Premise: You have, as you have proposed and as the president has commented on tonight, proposed a massive plan to extend health-care coverage to children. You're also talking about the government picking up a big part of the catastrophic bills that people get at the hospital.

Hypothesis: health-care coverage has a h

Anda telah, seperti yang anda cadangkan dan seperti yang telah diulas oleh presiden malam ini, mencadangkan rancangan besar-besaran untuk memperluaskan perlindungan penjagaan kesihatan kepada kanak-kanak. Anda juga bercakap tentang kerajaan mengambil sebahagian besar daripada bil bencana yang orang ramai dapat di hospital.

perlindungan penjagaan kesihatan mempunyai h


Premise: And thirdly, we need an earned-legalization program for people who have been here for a long time, stayed out of trouble, got a job, paid their taxes, and their kids are American. We got to start moving them toward full citizenship, out of the shadows. SCHIEFFER: Do you want to respond, Mr. President?

Hypothesis: The speaker believes immigrants are valuable to the country

The speaker must feel this way otherwise he would not propose such policies

Dan ketiga, kami memerlukan program pengesahan yang diperoleh untuk orang yang telah lama berada di sini, tidak menghadapi masalah, mendapat pekerjaan, membayar cukai dan anak-anak mereka adalah warga Amerika. Kita harus mula menggerakkan mereka ke arah kewarganegaraan penuh, keluar dari bayang-bayang. SCHIEFFER: Adakah anda mahu menjawab, Tuan Yang di-Pertua?

Penceramah percaya pendatang adalah berharga kepada negara


Premise: But I think we should start by greatly expanding the so-called child health insurance or CHIP program to give health insurance to every single child in this country. I think it's intolerable that we have so many millions of children without any health insurance.

Hypothesis: The agent thinks child health insurance is inadequate.

The statement is correct because the agent greatly thinks the chip program needs expanding, and that millions of children are without insurance.

Tetapi saya fikir kita harus bermula dengan meluaskan program yang dipanggil insurans kesihatan kanak-kanak atau CHIP untuk memberi insurans kesihatan kepada setiap kanak-kanak di negara ini. Saya rasa tidak boleh tahan bahawa kita mempunyai berjuta-juta kanak-kanak tanpa sebarang insurans kesihatan.

Ejen berpendapat insurans kesihatan kanak-kanak tidak mencukupi.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, on Friday, in reply to a question, the Minister of Canadian Heritage said in this House that the Americans had made a written commitment not to react to her subsidy program for Canadian publishers who, as we know, are the big losers in the agreement reached regarding Bill C-55.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a man.

The statement clearly states Mr. Speaker which indicates the speaker is male.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, pada hari Jumaat, dalam menjawab soalan, Menteri Warisan Kanada berkata di Dewan ini bahawa Amerika telah membuat komitmen bertulis untuk tidak bertindak balas terhadap program subsidinya untuk penerbit Kanada yang, seperti yang kita tahu, adalah yang rugi besar. dalam perjanjian yang dicapai mengenai Rang Undang-Undang C-55.


Premise: So we've got to enforce our civil rights laws. We've got to deal with things like racial profiling. And we have to keep our military strong. We have the strongest military, and I'll do whatever is necessary, if I'm president, to make sure that it stays that way.

Hypothesis: The person that wrote this wants to become president.

It's clearly stated in the passage, definitely correct.

Jadi kita perlu menguatkuasakan undang-undang hak sivil kita. Kita perlu berurusan dengan perkara seperti profil kaum. Dan kita perlu memastikan tentera kita kuat. Kami mempunyai tentera yang paling kuat, dan saya akan melakukan apa sahaja yang perlu, jika saya presiden, untuk memastikan ia kekal seperti itu.

Orang yang menulis ini mahu menjadi presiden.


Premise: If the union has recommended acceptance of this contract, and I assume then that it feels this is the best deal it can make, and the government is satisfied it is the best deal, it is fair to all concerned, does the Treasury Board president not feel that he may be endangering the ratification process by what we are doing here this evening?

Hypothesis: the treasury board president is opposing the contract

the speaker is questioning the treasury boards motives against a motion

Sekiranya kesatuan sekerja telah mengesyorkan penerimaan kontrak ini, dan saya menganggap bahawa ia merasakan ini adalah perjanjian terbaik yang boleh dibuatnya, dan kerajaan berpuas hati bahawa ia adalah perjanjian terbaik, ia adil kepada semua yang berkenaan, adakah presiden Lembaga Perbendaharaan tidak merasakan bahawa dia mungkin membahayakan proses ratifikasi dengan apa yang kita lakukan di sini petang ini?

presiden lembaga perbendaharaan menentang kontrak


Premise: Listen, the No Child Left Behind Act is really a jobs act when you think about it. The No Child Left Behind Act says, "We'll raise standards. We'll increase federal spending. But in return for extra spending, we now want people to measure -- states and local jurisdictions to measure to show us whether or not a child can read or write or add and subtract. "

Hypothesis: The No Child Left Behind Act may or may not increase child literacy.

I provided two definitive options within the statement: the act may raise literacy or the act may not raise literacy. I think that may have confused the AI. Alternately, it may have been thrown off by the word 'literacy,' which does not appear in the original statement.

Dengar, Akta No Child Left Behind sebenarnya merupakan akta pekerjaan apabila anda memikirkannya. Akta No Child Left Behind berkata, "Kami akan meningkatkan standard. Kami akan meningkatkan perbelanjaan persekutuan. Tetapi sebagai balasan untuk perbelanjaan tambahan, kami kini mahu orang ramai mengukur -- negeri dan bidang kuasa tempatan mengukur untuk menunjukkan kepada kami sama ada atau tidak kanak-kanak boleh membaca atau menulis atau menambah dan menolak."

Akta No Child Left Behind mungkin meningkatkan literasi kanak-kanak atau tidak.


Premise: I propose a detailed budget, Bob. I sent up my budget man to the Congress, and he says, here's how we're going to reduce the deficit in half by five years. It requires pro-growth policies that grow our economy and fiscal sanity in the halls of Congress.

Hypothesis: Congress approves budgets.

Congress approves budgets, according to the Constitution, but in the case of this passage, why else do you even have them deal with it if they didn't?

Saya mencadangkan belanjawan terperinci, Bob. Saya menghantar pegawai belanjawan saya ke Kongres, dan dia berkata, begini cara kita akan mengurangkan defisit dalam separuh sebanyak lima tahun. Ia memerlukan dasar pro-pertumbuhan yang mengembangkan ekonomi dan kewarasan fiskal kita di dewan Kongres.


Premise: Well, I think the fact that they're facing these repeated call-ups, some of them two and three deployments, and there's a stop- loss policy that prevents people from being able to get out when their time was up, is a reflection of the bad judgment this president exercised in how he has engaged in the world and deployed our forces.

Hypothesis: Some of them do not face two and three deployments.

The text says "they're facing these repeated call-ups, some of them two and three deployments," which implies that not all face this. The model thinks the negative statement [some do not] can't be true.

Nah, saya fikir hakikat bahawa mereka menghadapi panggilan berulang ini, beberapa daripadanya dua dan tiga penempatan, dan terdapat dasar stop-loss yang menghalang orang daripada dapat keluar apabila masa mereka tamat, adalah satu refleksi penilaian buruk yang dilakukan oleh presiden ini dalam cara dia terlibat dalam dunia dan mengerahkan pasukan kita.

Sebahagian daripada mereka tidak menghadapi dua dan tiga penempatan.


Premise: It is probably-and I ask myself the same question as the hon. member for Trois-Rivires does-to pass the time, because the government has no political will to truly lead the country, to advocate new directions for the economy, and to ensure that the injustices created by the cuts it imposed on the provinces are corrected.

Hypothesis: The restrictions placed on the provinces are unjust.

it has the same meaning just different wording so the AI marked it neither.

Ia mungkin-dan saya bertanya kepada diri sendiri soalan yang sama seperti yang hon. ahli untuk Trois-Rivires melakukan-untuk meluangkan masa, kerana kerajaan tidak mempunyai kemahuan politik untuk benar-benar memimpin negara, untuk menyokong hala tuju baharu untuk ekonomi, dan untuk memastikan bahawa ketidakadilan yang ditimbulkan oleh pemotongan yang dikenakan ke atas wilayah diperbetulkan .

Sekatan yang dikenakan ke atas wilayah adalah tidak adil.


Premise: What a slap in the face to many of the parents and taxpayers of the Dover area. How sad that a member of our own school board would be so closed-minded and not want to carry on the mission of Dover schools. "His ignorance will not only hold back children attending Dover area schools, but also reinforce other communities' views that Dover is a backwards, close-minded community.

Hypothesis: That member would be responsible for children no attending to  Dover area schools

If he doesn't support the program, children won't go to the Dover area schools, which makes him responsible for it.

Betapa tamparan di muka ramai ibu bapa dan pembayar cukai kawasan Dover. Betapa sedihnya seorang ahli lembaga sekolah kita sendiri akan bersikap tertutup dan tidak mahu meneruskan misi sekolah Dover. “Kejahilannya bukan sahaja akan menghalang kanak-kanak bersekolah di kawasan Dover, tetapi juga mengukuhkan pandangan masyarakat lain bahawa Dover adalah komuniti yang mundur dan berfikiran rapat.

Ahli itu akan bertanggungjawab terhadap kanak-kanak yang tidak menghadiri sekolah di kawasan Dover


Premise: Justice, the theory, which would advance the aim of limiting times in a way that is enforceable, is only applicable in the case that we brought before you here to the '98 act, and would not necessarily be applicable under the '76 act for the reasons the Government has offered.

Hypothesis: There are at least 97 acts.

The '98 act is mentioned so there must be at least 97. The system was confused by the number.

Keadilan, teori, yang akan memajukan matlamat mengehadkan masa dengan cara yang boleh dikuatkuasakan, hanya terpakai dalam kes yang kami bawa kepada anda di sini kepada akta '98, dan tidak semestinya terpakai di bawah akta '76 untuk sebab-sebab yang ditawarkan oleh Kerajaan.


Premise: Given the serious nature of the situation, ought not the government immediately mandate the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development to carry out a thorough investigation on the scandal of quotas and harassment of which both the unemployed and the employees of Human Resources Development Canada are victims?

Hypothesis: Former Human Resource Development employees have been harrassed

This statement is definitely correct because the context mentions the "harrassment of which both the unemployed and the employees of Human Resources Development of Canada are victims" indicating that fomerly employed HR people have been harassed.

Memandangkan keadaan yang serius, tidakkah kerajaan perlu segera memberi mandat kepada Jawatankuasa Tetap Pembangunan Sumber Manusia untuk menjalankan siasatan menyeluruh mengenai skandal kuota dan gangguan yang mana penganggur dan pekerja Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Kanada menjadi mangsa?

Bekas pekerja Pembangunan Sumber Manusia telah diganggu


Premise: Moreover, Canada encourages an expansion of religious freedom in China, including Tibet, and I do not doubt that Canada would welcome a dialogue between Chinese authorities and the Dalai Lama, a world spiritual leader who earned the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 for his dedication to peace and human rights.

Hypothesis: Canada which for more freedom of belief coming out of the other country as well as desiring more talks

Candada welcomed dialaged and wanted religous freedoms

Selain itu, Kanada menggalakkan perluasan kebebasan beragama di China, termasuk Tibet, dan saya tidak ragu bahawa Kanada akan mengalu-alukan dialog antara pihak berkuasa China dan Dalai Lama, seorang pemimpin rohani dunia yang memperoleh Hadiah Keamanan Nobel pada tahun 1989 atas dedikasinya kepada keamanan dan hak asasi manusia.

Kanada yang untuk lebih banyak kebebasan kepercayaan keluar dari negara lain serta menginginkan lebih banyak perbincangan


Premise: I've said it before, I say it again: I believe the president broke faith to the American people in the way that he took this nation to war. He said he would work through a real alliance. He said in Cincinnati we would plan carefully, we would take every precaution. Well, we didn't. And the result is our forces today are overextended.

Hypothesis: The president has no q in the name.

Saya telah mengatakannya sebelum ini, saya katakan sekali lagi: Saya percaya presiden telah mematahkan kepercayaan rakyat Amerika dalam cara dia membawa negara ini berperang. Dia berkata dia akan bekerja melalui pakatan sebenar. Dia berkata di Cincinnati kami akan merancang dengan teliti, kami akan mengambil setiap langkah berjaga-jaga. Kami tidak melakukannya. Dan hasilnya adalah kuasa kita hari ini terlalu diperluaskan.


Premise: The AIDS epidemic has taught us a great deal about what it means for an individual to have been abandoned by his family, then become a prominent artist, then be nursed to his death by his partner, or as the language has changed, his significant other, his long time companion, his partner, his spouse.

Hypothesis: The author is sympathetic to those with developed human immunodeficiency virus.

The author is sympathetic to those with AIDS, which is what HIV can develop into. All those with AIDS have HIV but not vice versa

Wabak AIDS telah banyak mengajar kita tentang ertinya seseorang individu telah ditinggalkan oleh keluarganya, kemudian menjadi artis terkemuka, kemudian diasuh hingga mati oleh pasangannya, atau apabila bahasa telah berubah, orang pentingnya. , teman lamanya, pasangannya, pasangannya.

Penulis bersimpati kepada mereka yang mempunyai virus immunodeficiency manusia.


Premise: Honourable senators, as I stand here today, it is particularly painful to know that in spite of the shock, the revulsion, the widespread publicity and awareness that has flowed from this dreadful event, violence against women and children continues to grow in our country and around the world.

Hypothesis: this person is concered with the welfare of others

they are clearly speaking about the welfare of people around the world, showing clear interest

Yang dihormati Senator, semasa saya berdiri di sini hari ini, adalah amat menyakitkan untuk mengetahui bahawa di sebalik kejutan, kebencian, publisiti dan kesedaran yang meluas yang telah mengalir daripada peristiwa yang mengerikan ini, keganasan terhadap wanita dan kanak-kanak terus berkembang di negara kita dan seluruh dunia.

orang ini mengambil berat tentang kebajikan orang lain


Premise: With reference to the honourable senator's remarks concerning the current non-determinative role of the Senate of Canada, has she in her reflections on this matter considered some of the ways in which the bill could be amended to very easily accommodate both the desire of the Prime Minister not to have this process held up in terms of time, and, second, to meet the very serious obligations before us in this house?

Hypothesis: The Prime Minister wants the matter resolved quickly.

"the desire of the Prime Minister not to have this process held up in terms of time"

Merujuk kepada kenyataan Yang Berhormat senator mengenai peranan bukan penentu semasa Senat Kanada, adakah beliau dalam renungan mengenai perkara ini mempertimbangkan beberapa cara di mana rang undang-undang itu boleh dipinda untuk menampung kedua-dua hasrat Perdana Menteri dengan mudah? Menteri untuk tidak menahan proses ini dari segi masa, dan, kedua, untuk memenuhi kewajipan yang sangat serius di hadapan kita di dewan ini?

Perdana Menteri mahu perkara itu diselesaikan segera.


Premise: More sometimes than people in foreign countries. And we need to do something about that. Not with the measure that leaves the majority of them without any real basic help until the next president's term of four years is over. But right away. And that means doing it under the Medicare program.

Hypothesis: Medicare can't wait to the next president

Medicare is the "Action" that the text is referring, and the text also says that it has to be done right away and people can't wait for a new term

Lebih kadang-kadang daripada orang di negara asing. Dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang itu. Bukan dengan langkah yang menyebabkan majoriti mereka tanpa bantuan asas sebenar sehingga tempoh empat tahun presiden akan datang berakhir. Tetapi dengan segera. Dan ini bermakna melakukannya di bawah program Medicare.

Medicare tidak sabar menunggu presiden seterusnya


Premise: What are we going to tell our children? I'm a grandfather now. I want to be able to tell my grandson when I'm in my later years that I didn't turn away from the evidence that showed that we were doing some serious harm. In my faith tradition, it is -- it's written in the book of Matthew, "Where your heart is, there is your treasure also."

Hypothesis: "Where your heart is, there is your treasure also" is a very old quote.

If the quote comes from the book of Matthew from the bible then it must be very old and the system doesn't know the age of the bible.

Apa yang akan kita beritahu anak-anak kita? Saya seorang datuk sekarang. Saya mahu dapat memberitahu cucu saya apabila saya di usia lanjut bahawa saya tidak berpaling daripada bukti yang menunjukkan bahawa kami melakukan beberapa kemudaratan yang serius. Dalam tradisi iman saya, ia adalah -- tertulis dalam kitab Matius, "Di mana hatimu berada, di situ juga hartamu."

"Di mana hati anda berada, di situ juga harta anda" adalah petikan yang sangat lama.


Premise: Well, I had thought that there was a controversy at the end of the legislative session where the hate crimes law in Texas was -- failed, and that the Byrd family, among others, asked you to support it, Governor, and it died in committee for lack of support. Am I wrong about that?

Hypothesis: Byrd is a surname.

The writer references the Byrd family, meaning Byrd is the last name, that is the surname. Maybe the model doesn't know this word.

Baiklah, saya fikir terdapat kontroversi pada penghujung sesi perundangan di mana undang-undang jenayah kebencian di Texas -- gagal, dan keluarga Byrd, antara lain, meminta anda menyokongnya, Gabenor, dan ia mati pada jawatankuasa kerana kekurangan sokongan. Adakah saya salah tentang itu?


Premise: The administration deserves credit for having made it work. It is important for NATO to have it work. It's important for NATO to be strong and confident and to help keep the peace in Europe. And one of the reasons I felt so strongly that the United States needed to participate was because of our relations with NATO, and NATO is going to be an important part of keeping the peace in the future.

Hypothesis: Future peace in Europe greatly depends on NATO's strong and confident administration.

I think the system found my statement incorrect because of the way I worded it.

Pentadbiran patut dipuji kerana telah berjaya. Adalah penting untuk NATO memastikan ia berfungsi. Adalah penting bagi NATO untuk menjadi kuat dan yakin serta membantu menjaga keamanan di Eropah. Dan salah satu sebab yang saya rasa sangat kuat bahawa Amerika Syarikat perlu mengambil bahagian adalah kerana hubungan kita dengan NATO, dan NATO akan menjadi bahagian penting dalam menjaga keamanan pada masa hadapan.

Keamanan masa depan di Eropah sangat bergantung kepada pentadbiran NATO yang kuat dan yakin.


Premise: I believe that younger workers ought to be allowed to take some of their own money and put it in a personal savings account, because I understand that they need to get better rates of return than the rates of return being given in the current Social Security trust.

Hypothesis: social security rates are too low

the statement is correct because the end of the paragraph states young people need better rates of return. I said the rates are too low, so the system probably didn't pick it up. I used vague wording.

Saya percaya bahawa pekerja yang lebih muda sepatutnya dibenarkan mengambil sedikit wang mereka sendiri dan memasukkannya ke dalam akaun simpanan peribadi, kerana saya faham bahawa mereka perlu mendapatkan kadar pulangan yang lebih baik daripada kadar pulangan yang diberikan dalam amanah Keselamatan Sosial semasa .


Premise: And one of the ways we're going to do it is, I'm going to work with my friend, John McCain, to further campaign finance reform so we get these incredible amounts of money out of the system and open it up to average people, so America is really represented by the people who make up America.

Hypothesis: John McCain supports the reform

Dan salah satu cara yang kami akan lakukan ialah, saya akan bekerjasama dengan rakan saya, John McCain, untuk meneruskan pembaharuan kewangan kempen supaya kami mendapatkan jumlah wang yang luar biasa ini daripada sistem dan membukanya kepada purata orang, jadi Amerika benar-benar diwakili oleh orang-orang yang membentuk Amerika.


Premise: And it was a smart move because there's gas reserves up there. We need gas pipelines to bring the gas down. Gas is a clean fuel that we can burn to -- we need to make sure that if we decontrol our plants that there's mandatory -- that the plants must conform to clean air standards, the grandfathered plants, that's what we did in Texas.

Hypothesis: We can use Texas as an example to how to fix the gas pipelines

Dan ia adalah satu langkah yang bijak kerana terdapat rizab gas di atas sana. Kami memerlukan saluran paip gas untuk menurunkan gas. Gas ialah bahan api bersih yang boleh kita bakar -- kita perlu memastikan bahawa jika kita menyahkawal loji kita bahawa terdapat wajib -- loji mesti mematuhi piawaian udara bersih, loji datuk, itulah yang kami lakukan di Texas.

Kita boleh menggunakan Texas sebagai contoh untuk membetulkan saluran paip gas


Premise: ``this section, the Ministers and the minister responsible for the other Act referred to in paragraph (6)( a ) are responsible for determining whether or not the requirements referred to in that paragraph are met by that other Act or regulations made under that Act, and ( a ) if the Ministers and that other minister determine that the''

Hypothesis: The Ministers are referred to multiple times in the text.

``seksyen ini, Menteri-Menteri dan menteri yang bertanggungjawab bagi Akta lain yang disebut dalam perenggan (6)(a) bertanggungjawab untuk menentukan sama ada atau tidak kehendak yang disebut dalam perenggan itu dipenuhi oleh Akta atau peraturan lain yang dibuat di bawah itu. Bertindak, dan (a ) jika Menteri-menteri dan menteri lain itu menentukan bahawa''

Para Menteri dirujuk beberapa kali dalam teks.


Premise: Let me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.

Hypothesis: The governor is from a large state.

Biar saya beritahu anda siapa jurinya. Penduduk Texas. Hanya ada seorang gabenor yang pernah dipilih untuk penggal empat tahun berturut-turut, dan itu adalah saya. Dan saya dapat berbuat demikian dengan banyak undi Demokrat, hampir 50% undi Hispanik, kira-kira 27% undi Afrika-Amerika, kerana orang tahu saya seorang yang konservatif dan seorang yang penyayang.


Premise: Everything is a gift from the Almighty. And as I measure the words of the Bible -- and we all do; different people measure different things -- the Koran, the Torah, or, you know, Native Americans who gave me a blessing the other day had their own special sense of connectedness to a higher being. And people all find their ways to express it.

Hypothesis: "the Almighty" refers to God

It's a religious article, so it can be inferred that the almighty refers to God

Semuanya anugerah dari Yang Maha Esa. Dan semasa saya mengukur perkataan Alkitab -- dan kita semua melakukannya; orang yang berbeza mengukur perkara yang berbeza -- Al-Quran, Taurat, atau, anda tahu, Orang Asli Amerika yang memberi saya berkat pada hari lain mempunyai rasa keterkaitan istimewa mereka dengan makhluk yang lebih tinggi. Dan semua orang mencari cara mereka untuk menyatakannya.


Premise: 10.1 Notwithstanding anything in this Act, where the Royal Canadian Mint, Canada Post Corporation or Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation is authorized to make a payment to a taxing authority in lieu of a business occupancy tax and the corporation decides not to make that payment, the corporation shall, without delay, provide the authority with written reasons for that decision.''

Hypothesis: the rule in 10.1 with a written reason allows certain groups to not make payments to their taxes

10.1 Walau apa pun dalam Akta ini, di mana Royal Canadian Mint, Canada Post Corporation atau Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation diberi kuasa untuk membuat pembayaran kepada pihak berkuasa cukai sebagai ganti cukai penghunian perniagaan dan perbadanan memutuskan untuk tidak membuat pembayaran itu, perbadanan hendaklah, tanpa berlengah-lengah, memberikan pihak berkuasa alasan bertulis untuk keputusan itu.''

peraturan dalam 10.1 dengan alasan bertulis membenarkan kumpulan tertentu untuk tidak membuat pembayaran kepada cukai mereka


Premise: This morning, the Minister of Immigration told me that 248 confirmed refugees were on their way to Canada - mostly women, children and grandparents - and she also said that 19 of those who had been chosen to be among the first to come had actually declined the invitation, having decided to stay close to their home.

Hypothesis: Immigrants were on the way to a country called canada to seek asylum from their country

Pagi ini, Menteri Imigresen memberitahu saya bahawa 248 pelarian yang disahkan sedang dalam perjalanan ke Kanada - kebanyakannya wanita, kanak-kanak dan datuk nenek - dan dia juga berkata bahawa 19 daripada mereka yang telah dipilih untuk menjadi antara yang pertama datang sebenarnya telah menolak jemputan, setelah memutuskan untuk tinggal dekat dengan rumah mereka.

Pendatang sedang dalam perjalanan ke sebuah negara bernama kanada untuk mendapatkan suaka dari negara mereka


Premise: Among the changes made to CEPA, Bill C-32 includes the provision to implement pollution prevention, new procedures for the investigation and assessment of substances and new requirements for toxicity assessments, new provisions respecting fuels, international air and water pollution, motor emissions, federal and aboriginal land protection, the proper disposal of wastes and other matters at sea and the safer export and import of waste.

Hypothesis: Among the changes made to CEPA, Bill C-32 includes the provision to implement pollution prevention, new procedures for the investigation and assessment of substances and new requirements for toxicity assessments. This will aid the environment.

These measures will aid the environment.

Antara perubahan yang dibuat kepada CEPA, Rang Undang-Undang C-32 termasuk peruntukan untuk melaksanakan pencegahan pencemaran, prosedur baharu untuk penyiasatan dan penilaian bahan dan keperluan baharu untuk penilaian ketoksikan, peruntukan baharu berkenaan bahan api, pencemaran udara dan air antarabangsa, pelepasan motor, persekutuan. dan perlindungan tanah orang asli, pelupusan sisa dan perkara lain yang betul di laut dan eksport dan import sisa yang lebih selamat.

Antara perubahan yang dibuat kepada CEPA, Rang Undang-Undang C-32 termasuk peruntukan untuk melaksanakan pencegahan pencemaran, prosedur baharu untuk penyiasatan dan penilaian bahan dan keperluan baharu untuk penilaian ketoksikan. Ini akan membantu alam sekitar.


Premise: People who fly on airplanes today, the cargo hold is not X-rayed, but the baggage is. That's not good enough. Firehouses don't have enough firefighters in them. Police officers are being cut from the streets of America because the president decided to cut the COPS program.

Hypothesis: airplanes have fuel in them

Orang yang terbang di atas kapal terbang hari ini, pegangan kargo tidak X-rayed, tetapi bagasi itu. Itu tidak cukup baik. Firehouses tidak mempunyai anggota bomba yang mencukupi di dalamnya. Pegawai polis dipotong dari jalan -jalan di Amerika kerana presiden memutuskan untuk memotong program polis.

kapal terbang mempunyai bahan api di dalamnya


Premise: The statements I make or the statements that I do not make in my classroom tell my students something. So I think we're charged with, you know, having an ethical decision to make when we walk into the classroom, the things that we say and the things that we do, and so I think that's very important.

Hypothesis: The narrator is a teacher

Yes The narrator has students and works in a classroom

Kenyataan yang saya buat atau kenyataan yang saya tidak buat di dalam bilik darjah saya memberitahu pelajar saya sesuatu. Jadi saya rasa kita didakwa, anda tahu, mempunyai keputusan beretika yang perlu dibuat apabila kita masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, perkara yang kita perkatakan dan perkara yang kita lakukan, jadi saya fikir itu sangat penting.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, what the member has failed to point out is that the number of jobs in Canada has jumped by 1.2 million since October 1993 because of a healthy economy, because we have put our fiscal house back in order, because we now have active measures to help workers back into the job market, because of 30,000 such jobs, and because of the transitional jobs fund in regions where unemployment was too high.

Hypothesis: Canada's employment rate is a consequence of its recent ecnomy

The context explicitly says that "the number of jobs in Canada has jumped by 1.2 million since October 1993 because of a healthy economy", so Canada's employment rate is indeed a result of its economy after October 1993.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, apa yang gagal dinyatakan oleh ahli ialah bilangan pekerjaan di Kanada telah melonjak sebanyak 1.2 juta sejak Oktober 1993 kerana ekonomi yang sihat, kerana kita telah menyusun semula rumah fiskal kita, kerana kita kini telah aktif. langkah-langkah untuk membantu pekerja kembali ke pasaran pekerjaan, kerana 30,000 pekerjaan sedemikian, dan kerana dana pekerjaan peralihan di wilayah di mana pengangguran terlalu tinggi.

Kadar pekerjaan Kanada adalah akibat daripada ekonomi baru-baru ini


Premise: Where it falls apart is west of the Ontario border because instead of each of the western provinces being given a number of senators equal or in comparison to the other provinces that were already in, the four western provinces got only twenty-four senators, in other words, six for Alberta, six for B.C., six for Manitoba and six for Saskatchewan.

Hypothesis: Saskatchewan got as many senators as Manitoba.

They both got 6 senators. I'm not sure why this was difficult really, maybe the system has trouble comparing values when they are written as words, not sure.

Di mana ia runtuh adalah di sebelah barat sempadan Ontario kerana bukannya setiap wilayah barat diberi bilangan senator yang sama atau berbanding dengan wilayah lain yang sudah ada, empat wilayah barat hanya mendapat dua puluh empat senator, di lain-lain perkataan, enam untuk Alberta, enam untuk B.C., enam untuk Manitoba dan enam untuk Saskatchewan.

Saskatchewan mendapat seramai senator seperti Manitoba.


Premise: I don't disagree with that. I certainly don't disagree that we ought to get our troops home from places like the Balkans as soon as we can, as soon as the mission is complete. That's what we did in Haiti. There are no more than a handful of American military personnel in Haiti now.

Hypothesis: The minimum presence of American military personnel in Haiti means that there are only some immediately available if they are needed onsite.

A limited amount available immediately equals the number remaining in the country.

Saya tidak bersetuju dengan itu. Saya pastinya tidak bersetuju bahawa kita harus membawa pulang tentera kita dari tempat seperti Balkan secepat mungkin, sebaik sahaja misi itu selesai. Itulah yang kami lakukan di Haiti. Tidak ada lebih daripada segelintir anggota tentera Amerika di Haiti sekarang.

Kehadiran minimum anggota tentera Amerika di Haiti bermakna terdapat hanya beberapa yang tersedia dengan segera jika mereka diperlukan di tapak.


Premise: Instead of changing the balance in favour of the unions, prohibiting employers to use scabs brings the forces back into balance to a point that favours more reasonable negotiations where both employer and union work to quickly find a common ground, develop relations that will enable them to reconcile their divergent interests and find solutions that reflect their convergent interests.

Hypothesis: Denying employers from using scabs is what allows the union to be more equal

It clearly states it makes it more balanced, so this can equate to being equal too

Daripada menukar keseimbangan yang memihak kepada kesatuan sekerja, melarang majikan menggunakan scabs membawa kuasa kembali seimbang ke tahap yang memihak kepada rundingan yang lebih munasabah di mana kedua-dua majikan dan kesatuan bekerja untuk segera mencari titik persamaan, membangunkan hubungan yang akan membolehkan mereka untuk mendamaikan kepentingan mereka yang berbeza dan mencari penyelesaian yang mencerminkan kepentingan konvergen mereka.

Menafikan majikan daripada menggunakan kudis adalah yang membolehkan kesatuan menjadi lebih setara


Premise: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-67 with no resistance at this time because we believe that the bill is offering advantages to Canadians, we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur.

Hypothesis: The house will scold the government for their foot dragging.

It was stated that the foot dragging will be scolded

Kesimpulannya, sementara kami di sebelah Dewan ini menyokong RUU C-67 tanpa tentangan pada masa ini kerana kami percaya bahawa rang undang-undang itu menawarkan kelebihan kepada rakyat Kanada, kami harus mengambil kesempatan untuk memarahi kerajaan kerana kakinya mengheret dalam melaksanakan. perubahan selanjutnya kepada industri perkhidmatan kewangan yang perlu berlaku.

Rumah itu akan memarahi kerajaan kerana mengheret kaki mereka.


Premise: Mike Harris has kept his word to Ontarian voters by cutting taxes for working families by 30%, eliminating the huge provincial deficit by next year, creating over 850,000 new jobs and introducing a taxpayer protection act with teeth, all while increasing health care spending and absorbing the huge transfer cuts of this Liberal government.

Hypothesis: Ontarian working families pay 70% of what they did the previous year.

If taxes were cut by 30% then they paid 70% of what they did the previous year.

Mike Harris telah menepati janjinya kepada pengundi Ontaria dengan memotong cukai untuk keluarga yang bekerja sebanyak 30%, menghapuskan defisit wilayah yang besar menjelang tahun depan, mewujudkan lebih 850,000 pekerjaan baharu dan memperkenalkan akta perlindungan pembayar cukai dengan gigi, semuanya sambil meningkatkan perbelanjaan penjagaan kesihatan dan menyerap pemotongan pemindahan besar kerajaan Liberal ini.

Keluarga bekerja Ontario membayar 70% daripada apa yang mereka lakukan pada tahun sebelumnya.


Premise: And we have got to again lead by example and help these other countries that are trying to straighten out their situations find the tools in order to do it. I just think, Jim, that this is an absolutely unique period in world history. The world has come together, as I said, they're looking to us.

Hypothesis: The speaker is speaking metaphorically about international politics and policy, he doesn't actually mean that the entire world is looking and Jim and him, or that they need to find some physical tools to use for straightening things.

The system struggles with metaphors and euphemisms. I just tried to explain the original statement, but the system didn't believe me.

Dan kita perlu sekali lagi memimpin melalui teladan dan membantu negara-negara lain yang cuba memperbetulkan keadaan mereka mencari alat untuk melakukannya. Saya hanya fikir, Jim, bahawa ini adalah tempoh yang benar-benar unik dalam sejarah dunia. Dunia telah bersatu, seperti yang saya katakan, mereka melihat kepada kita.

Penceramah bercakap secara metafora tentang politik dan dasar antarabangsa, dia sebenarnya tidak bermaksud bahawa seluruh dunia sedang mencari dan Jim dan dia, atau bahawa mereka perlu mencari beberapa alat fizikal untuk digunakan untuk meluruskan perkara.


Premise: As the C.D. Howe Institute notes, the tendency to employ this kind of one-time initiative to lower the reported surplus has the effect of biasing initiatives against tax cuts and into program spending and, in particular, into program spending of the type that can be delivered through some sort of foundation or fund.

Hypothesis: the c.d. howe institute studies taxes

The subject of the statement is tax cuts being discouraged routing spending into founfations

Sebagai C.D. Howe Institute mencatat, kecenderungan untuk menggunakan inisiatif sekali ini untuk mengurangkan lebihan yang dilaporkan mempunyai kesan inisiatif berat sebelah terhadap pemotongan cukai dan ke dalam perbelanjaan program dan, khususnya, ke dalam perbelanjaan program jenis yang boleh disampaikan melalui beberapa macam yayasan atau dana.


Premise: I am -- you know it's really interesting. I tell the people on the campaign trail, when I asked Laura to marry me, she said, "Fine, just so long as I never have to give a speech. "I said, "OK, you've got a deal. "Fortunately, she didn't hold me to that deal. And she's out campaigning along with our girls. And she speaks English a lot better than I do. I think people understand what she's saying.

Hypothesis: The narrator is most likely George Bush

Saya -- anda tahu ia sangat menarik. Saya memberitahu orang-orang di jejak kempen, apabila saya meminta Laura untuk mengahwini saya, dia berkata, "Baiklah, asalkan saya tidak perlu berucap. "Saya berkata, "OK, anda ada perjanjian." Nasib baik, dia tidak menahan saya dengan perjanjian itu. Dan dia keluar berkempen bersama gadis kami. Dan dia bercakap bahasa Inggeris lebih baik daripada saya. Saya rasa orang faham apa yang dia cakap.


Premise: The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, and taking into account collective agreements entered into by the employer in respect of bargaining units in the Public Service since the Public Sector Compensation Act ceased to apply to compensation plans applicable to them-

Hypothesis: There are plans regarding money

Compensation refers to money, so this is correct

Gabenor dalam Majlis boleh, atas syor Lembaga Perbendaharaan, dan mengambil kira perjanjian kolektif yang dibuat oleh majikan berkenaan dengan unit tawar-menawar dalam Perkhidmatan Awam sejak Akta Pampasan Sektor Awam tidak lagi terpakai kepada pelan pampasan yang terpakai kepada mereka-


Premise: I am sure that the minister will be concerned about reports today that the panel on ecological integrity in Canada's national parks appears about to report that the national parks are in serious trouble, that the ecological integrity principle that the parks are supposed to be managed on is not being applied consistently, and that scientific talent is thin in the parks.

Hypothesis: The lack of consistency and expertise is putting the parks at risk

This statement is definitely correct because the parks are reported to be "in serious trouble

Saya pasti menteri akan mengambil berat tentang laporan hari ini bahawa panel mengenai integriti ekologi di taman negara Kanada nampaknya akan melaporkan bahawa taman negara menghadapi masalah serius, bahawa prinsip integriti ekologi yang sepatutnya diuruskan adalah tidak digunakan secara konsisten, dan bakat saintifik itu tipis di taman.

Kekurangan konsistensi dan kepakaran meletakkan taman dalam risiko


Premise: Yes, I think it is. Absolutely. I don't think he would have fallen had we not used the force. And I know there are some in our party that disagree with that sentiment. I supported the president. I thought he made the right decision to do so. I didn't think he necessarily made the right decision to take land troops off the table right before we committed ourselves offensively, but nevertheless, it worked.

Hypothesis: It worked and the land troops were not needed.

The statement says it worked and that land troops were off the table.

Ya, saya fikir ia adalah. betul-betul. Saya tidak fikir dia akan jatuh jika kita tidak menggunakan kekerasan. Dan saya tahu ada dalam parti kita yang tidak bersetuju dengan sentimen itu. Saya menyokong presiden. Saya fikir dia membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk berbuat demikian. Saya tidak fikir dia semestinya membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk mengeluarkan tentera darat dari meja sebelum kami melakukan serangan, tetapi bagaimanapun, ia berjaya.

Ia berfungsi dan tentera darat tidak diperlukan.


Premise: I ask today whether the parliamentary secretary, on behalf of the minister, will confirm that this commitment would not only address the issues I have listed but would also ensure that equivalent safety facilities to those of other airports with the same capacity such as Ottawa and Winnipeg are available for Halifax International Airport.

Hypothesis: Ottawa and Winnipeg airports are safer than Halifax based on the capacity.

The speaker is moving for equivalent safety facilities of airports with the same capacity, so it can be inferred that Halifax is not as safe as the examples stated. The system might have tripped over the word "safer" instead of "safety facilities."

Saya bertanya hari ini sama ada setiausaha parlimen, bagi pihak menteri, akan mengesahkan bahawa komitmen ini bukan sahaja akan menangani isu yang saya senaraikan tetapi juga akan memastikan kemudahan keselamatan yang setara dengan lapangan terbang lain yang mempunyai kapasiti yang sama seperti Ottawa dan Winnipeg tersedia untuk Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Halifax.

Lapangan terbang Ottawa dan Winnipeg adalah lebih selamat daripada Halifax berdasarkan kapasiti.


Premise: You know, in the last, or two decades ago it was routine for leaders of foreign countries to come over here and say you guys have got to do something about these horrendous deficits because it's causing tremendous problems for the rest of the world, and we were lectured to all the time.

Hypothesis: foreign countries contains a f

Anda tahu, sejak dua dekad yang lalu, sudah menjadi rutin bagi pemimpin negara asing untuk datang ke sini dan mengatakan bahawa anda perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang defisit yang teruk ini kerana ia menyebabkan masalah besar bagi seluruh dunia, dan kami diberi syarahan sepanjang masa.


Premise: Outsourcing is going to happen. I've acknowledged that in union halls across the country. I've had shop stewards stand up and say, "Will you promise me you're going to stop all this outsourcing? "And I've looked them in the eye and I've said, "No, I can't do that. "

Hypothesis: he was on his feet when make them promise something.

if he was stand up and  say Will you promise me you're going to stop all this outsourcing?, he was on his feet.

Penyumberan luar akan berlaku. Saya telah mengakui bahawa di dewan kesatuan di seluruh negara. Saya telah menyuruh penjaga kedai berdiri dan berkata, "Adakah anda berjanji kepada saya bahawa anda akan menghentikan semua penyumberan luar ini? "Dan saya telah melihat mereka di mata dan saya telah berkata, "Tidak, saya tidak boleh lakukan itu."

dia berdiri apabila membuat mereka berjanji sesuatu.


Premise: We are going to simply have them testify for the purpose of authenticating the contents of that article, nothing more, nothing less, because I really believe that to do more than that is to create, I think, a precedent which would have reporters called -- Mr. Benn, I think, fears that even this would do that. I don't share that fear. But to go any further than that would mean that a reporter's veracity could be questioned each and every time something like this comes up. I strain mightily not to have to do that. That's what I'm talking about. Now, I don't know if that clarifies it.

Hypothesis: Mr Benn is worried

The context states that Mr Benn 'fears that even this would do that'. If you fear something in this context it means to worry about it so the statement is correct. The system likely incorrectly assumed fear as being frightened.

Kami hanya akan meminta mereka memberi keterangan untuk tujuan mengesahkan kandungan artikel itu, tidak lebih, tidak kurang, kerana saya benar-benar percaya bahawa untuk melakukan lebih daripada itu adalah untuk mencipta, saya fikir, satu preseden yang akan memanggil wartawan - - Encik Benn, saya rasa, takut bahawa ini akan berbuat demikian. Saya tidak berkongsi ketakutan itu. Tetapi untuk pergi lebih jauh daripada itu bermakna kebenaran wartawan boleh dipersoalkan setiap kali perkara seperti ini muncul. Saya meneran dengan kuat untuk tidak perlu berbuat demikian. Itulah yang saya cakapkan. Sekarang, saya tidak tahu sama ada itu menjelaskannya.


Premise: President Bush has taken -- he's the only president in history to do this. He's also the only president in 72 years to lose jobs -- 1. 6 million jobs lost. He's the only president to have incomes of families go down for the last three years; the only president to see exports go down; the only president to see the lowest level of business investment in our country as it is today.

Hypothesis: President Bush is a male president

Presiden Bush telah mengambil -- dia satu-satunya presiden dalam sejarah yang melakukan ini. Dia juga satu-satunya presiden dalam 72 tahun kehilangan pekerjaan -- 1. 6 juta pekerjaan hilang. Dia adalah satu-satunya presiden yang mempunyai pendapatan keluarga yang merosot selama tiga tahun terakhir; satu-satunya presiden yang melihat eksport turun; satu-satunya presiden yang melihat tahap pelaburan perniagaan yang paling rendah di negara kita seperti hari ini.

Presiden Bush ialah seorang presiden lelaki


Premise: In other words, like it was not the current finance minister, like it was not the current prime minister, like it was not even the former revenue minister who now sits as the fisheries minister, like it was not these people of the government in the 35th and 36th parliaments who actually brought in the legislation.

Hypothesis: This statement contains less than 28 sentences

The statement contains nowhere near 28 sentences!

Dalam erti kata lain, seperti bukan menteri kewangan sekarang, seperti bukan perdana menteri sekarang, seperti bukan juga bekas menteri hasil yang kini duduk sebagai menteri perikanan, seperti bukan orang-orang kerajaan ini dalam Parlimen ke-35 dan ke-36 yang sebenarnya membawa perundangan.

Penyataan ini mengandungi kurang daripada 28 ayat


Premise: But let me go a step further. We have a long distance yet to travel in terms of fairness in America. I don't know how you can govern in this country when you look at New York City and you see that 50 percent of the black males there are unemployed, when you see 40 percent of Hispanic children -- of black children in some cities -- dropping out of high school.

Hypothesis: Demographics are used in order to highlight divisions between race, these highlight draw into question how the country is ran.

This is correct as demographics are used to show the differences between races and the governing of the country is questioned in the way of the statement mentioning they "don't know how you can govern in this country" when looking at the demographics hinting that it should't be this way.

Tetapi biarlah saya melangkah lebih jauh. Kami mempunyai jarak yang jauh lagi untuk mengembara dari segi keadilan di Amerika. Saya tidak tahu bagaimana anda boleh mentadbir negara ini apabila anda melihat New York City dan anda melihat bahawa 50 peratus daripada lelaki kulit hitam di sana menganggur, apabila anda melihat 40 peratus kanak-kanak Hispanik -- kanak-kanak kulit hitam di beberapa bandar - - berhenti sekolah menengah.

Demografi digunakan untuk menyerlahkan perpecahan antara kaum, sorotan ini menimbulkan persoalan bagaimana negara ini dikendalikan.


Premise: We can disagree with the substance of the report, and I am prepared to debate it further, but I find it totally unacceptable that it was adopted in ten minutes, at a time when we had to be in the House to counter an unprecedented attack against the democratic rights of Quebecers.

Hypothesis: the speaker is concerned for the quebecois

quebecois and quebecers are the same thing

Kita boleh tidak bersetuju dengan kandungan laporan itu, dan saya bersedia untuk membahaskannya dengan lebih lanjut, tetapi saya mendapati ia sama sekali tidak boleh diterima bahawa ia telah diterima pakai dalam masa sepuluh minit, pada masa kita terpaksa berada di Dewan untuk menentang serangan yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelum ini. hak demokrasi orang Quebec.


Premise: This week, the Bloc Quebecois presented a motion asking the government for the opportunity to exercise a very democratic right in the House of Commons: the members' right to vote and give the government the mandate to takes its responsibilities in terms of honouring commitments made to NATO.

Hypothesis: It is wrong to say that no commitments have been made to NATO.

If commitments to NATO can be honoured, then Commitments have been made, and it is wrong to say that no commitments have been made to NATO.  The Statement is definitely correct.

Minggu ini, Blok Quebecois membentangkan usul meminta kerajaan memberi peluang untuk melaksanakan hak yang sangat demokratik di Dewan Rakyat: hak ahli untuk mengundi dan memberi mandat kepada kerajaan untuk mengambil tanggungjawabnya dari segi menghormati komitmen yang dibuat untuk NATO.

Adalah salah untuk mengatakan bahawa tiada komitmen telah dibuat kepada NATO.


Premise: By doing so, the reporters would be verbalizing the contents of said affidavit -- I think, actually, they were your words when we had the telephone conference -- by testifying as to what appears in the newspaper article or articles, unless such affidavit is otherwise accepted by all parties as validating and authenticating the contents of the newspaper article or articles in issue. Meaning if they accept it, it becomes moot.

Hypothesis: If the reporters do something that is unspoken i this text, that means they are speaking about the contents of the affidavit.

It's true, "by doing so" refers to something spoken about before this text

Dengan berbuat demikian, wartawan akan menyatakan secara lisan kandungan afidavit tersebut -- saya rasa, sebenarnya, ia adalah kata-kata anda semasa kami mengadakan persidangan telefon -- dengan memberi keterangan tentang apa yang terdapat dalam artikel atau artikel akhbar, melainkan afidavit tersebut adalah sebaliknya diterima oleh semua pihak sebagai mengesahkan dan mengesahkan kandungan artikel atau artikel akhbar yang dikeluarkan. Bermakna jika mereka menerimanya, ia menjadi bantahan.

Jika wartawan melakukan sesuatu yang tidak terucap i teks ini, itu bermakna mereka bercakap tentang kandungan afidavit.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, for two years the Canadian government has been engaged in secret negotiations on the multilateral agreement on investment, an agreement which goes well beyond the provisions of NAFTA in ceding power to multinationals and threatens to diminish even further the rights of nations to direct their own economies, provide safe and decent working conditions and protect the environment for future generations.

Hypothesis: The Canadian government governs Canadians.

Because it doesn't know anything about Canada.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, selama dua tahun kerajaan Kanada telah terlibat dalam rundingan rahsia mengenai perjanjian pelbagai hala mengenai pelaburan, perjanjian yang melampaui peruntukan NAFTA dalam menyerahkan kuasa kepada syarikat multinasional dan mengancam untuk mengurangkan lagi hak negara untuk mengarahkan ekonomi mereka sendiri, menyediakan keadaan kerja yang selamat dan baik serta melindungi alam sekitar untuk generasi akan datang.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I remind the Leader of the Opposition to go back and read Hansard because I specifically stated that we are continuing to target resources, reducing taxes, paying down public debt and investing in the knowledge of people and safeguarding and improving our health care system.

Hypothesis: The health care system is being improved.

The statement says they are improving our health care system.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingatkan kepada Ketua Pembangkang supaya kembali membaca Hansard kerana saya secara khusus menyatakan bahawa kita terus menyasarkan sumber, mengurangkan cukai, membayar hutang awam dan melabur dalam pengetahuan orang ramai dan menjaga serta meningkatkan penjagaan kesihatan kita. sistem.

Sistem penjagaan kesihatan sedang diperbaiki.


Premise: This story goes back a number of years to when a company from Nova Scotia, related by the way to the leader of the NDP, the L.E. Shaw group of companies, a very reputable company I might add, proposed doing a similar type of business, a quarrying business on the banks of the Saint Croix River in the Bayside Ports area.

Hypothesis: "Saint Croix River" is composed of less than eight words.

"Saint Croix River" is composed of less than eight words is definitely correct, because "Saint Croix River" is composed of three words, and three is less than eight.

Kisah ini kembali beberapa tahun apabila sebuah syarikat dari Nova Scotia, yang berkaitan dengan cara kepada pemimpin NDP, L.E. Shaw Group of Companies, sebuah syarikat yang sangat bereputasi yang mungkin saya tambahkan, mencadangkan melakukan jenis perniagaan yang sama, perniagaan penggalian di tebing Sungai Saint Croix di kawasan pelabuhan Bayside.

"Sungai Saint Croix" terdiri daripada kurang daripada lapan perkataan.


Premise: Now, what was your reaction to what you saw and heard at the board meeting on or about -- I think you said June the 15th or 16th? I think, for the record, it's established that it's June the 14th. But tell us, what was your reaction to what you heard?

Hypothesis: Others are being encouraged to let others now what they thought about the board meeting.

they are being asked for their reaction so it is correct but it is worded differently so the AI marked it neither.

Sekarang, apakah reaksi anda terhadap apa yang anda lihat dan dengar pada mesyuarat lembaga pada atau kira-kira -- saya rasa anda berkata pada 15 atau 16 Jun? Saya fikir, untuk rekod, ia telah ditetapkan pada 14 Jun. Tetapi beritahu kami, apakah reaksi anda terhadap apa yang anda dengar?

Orang lain digalakkan untuk membiarkan orang lain sekarang apa yang mereka fikirkan tentang mesyuarat lembaga.


Premise: In the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, whenever my colleagues Senators Beaudoin, Nolin, Bryden and Grafstein and I have an opportunity to discuss or debate the issue of human rights, we, of course, are mindful of the international obligations of Canada.

Hypothesis: canada operates on a global scale

canada interacts internationally, so in other words globaly

Dalam Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat mengenai Hal Ehwal Undang-undang dan Perlembagaan, setiap kali rakan sekerja saya Senator Beaudoin, Nolin, Bryden dan Grafstein dan saya mempunyai peluang untuk membincangkan atau membahaskan isu hak asasi manusia, kami, sudah tentu, mengambil berat tentang kewajipan antarabangsa Kanada. .


Premise: And it's the right cause. It's the right decision. Secondly, there is other forms of racial profiling that goes on in America. Arab-Americans are racially profiled in what is called secret evidence. People are stopped, and we have to do something about that.

Hypothesis: Racial profiling and secret evidence go hand in hand

Secret evidence is a form of racial profiling

Dan ia adalah punca yang betul. Ia adalah keputusan yang tepat. Kedua, terdapat bentuk profil kaum lain yang berlaku di Amerika. Arab-Amerika berprofil perkauman dalam apa yang dipanggil bukti rahsia. Orang ramai dihentikan, dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu mengenainya.

Pemprofilan kaum dan bukti rahsia berjalan seiring


Premise: A headline in the local paper stated that the Health Canada scientists, who you had mentioned earlier in your speech had taken affidavits in order to be able to talk, had been gagged by the department over their protest and will likely be under gag order for the rest of their careers, despite a Senate promise to keep an eye on Health Canada's management problems.

Hypothesis: Health Canada has management problems.

It says that an eye needs to be kept on management problems.

Tajuk utama dalam akhbar tempatan menyatakan bahawa saintis Health Canada, yang telah anda nyatakan sebelum ini dalam ucapan anda telah mengambil afidavit untuk bercakap, telah disumbat mulut oleh jabatan atas bantahan mereka dan mungkin akan berada di bawah perintah gag untuk sisa kerjaya mereka, walaupun Senat berjanji untuk memerhatikan masalah pengurusan Health Canada.

Health Canada mempunyai masalah pengurusan.


Premise: There is ample opportunity for discussion in this House and there will be ample opportunity for continued discussion outside of this House, as every member of the government will be out in their constituencies consulting with their constituents, consulting with Canadians about the priorities and whether we have these priorities right and what we should be doing with our fiscal dividend when that dividend appears.

Hypothesis: The government is discussing the proposal

According to the passage, the government is discussing the proposal

Terdapat banyak peluang untuk perbincangan di Dewan ini dan akan ada banyak peluang untuk perbincangan berterusan di luar Dewan ini, kerana setiap ahli kerajaan akan berada di kawasan pilihan raya mereka untuk berunding dengan pengundi mereka, berunding dengan orang Kanada tentang keutamaan dan sama ada kita mempunyai keutamaan ini betul dan apa yang patut kita lakukan dengan dividen fiskal kita apabila dividen itu muncul.


Premise: This practice of forbidding the use of direct citations from the debates of the House of Commons, euphemistically identified as "the other place," was originally intended to prevent, according to Erskine May, fruitless arguments between members of two distinct bodies who are unable to reply to each other and to guard against recrimination and offensive language in the absence of the other party.

Hypothesis: Stupid arguments used to happen in the House of Commons.

Yes, they did - the statement says that fruitless arguments happened there.

Amalan melarang penggunaan petikan langsung daripada perbahasan Dewan Rakyat, yang dikenal pasti secara eufemisme sebagai "tempat lain," pada asalnya bertujuan untuk menghalang, menurut Erskine May, pertengkaran yang sia-sia antara ahli dua badan berbeza yang tidak dapat membalas antara satu sama lain dan untuk menjaga terhadap tuduhan dan bahasa yang menyinggung apabila pihak yang satu lagi tidak hadir.

Hujah bodoh pernah berlaku di Dewan Rakyat.


Premise: And education is my number one priority, because I think that it's the most important big major change that we can bring in our country. I agree with Governor Bush that we should have new accountability, testing of students. I think that we should require states to test all students, test schools and school districts, and I think that we should go further and require teacher testing for new teachers also.

Hypothesis: There should be an exam to make sure new teachers are properly qualified to teach

Dan pendidikan adalah keutamaan nombor satu saya, kerana saya fikir ia adalah perubahan besar yang paling penting yang boleh kita bawa di negara kita. Saya bersetuju dengan Gabenor Bush bahawa kita harus mempunyai akauntabiliti baharu, menguji pelajar. Saya berpendapat bahawa kita harus meminta negeri untuk menguji semua pelajar, sekolah ujian dan daerah sekolah, dan saya fikir kita harus pergi lebih jauh dan memerlukan ujian guru untuk guru baharu juga.

Perlu ada peperiksaan untuk memastikan guru baharu layak untuk mengajar


Premise: Furthermore, by deciding that online broadcasts from traditional broadcasters, such as radio and TV stations, will be exempt from CRTC control, the agency has addressed a particular concern of the committee which wanted the government to clarify the distinction, if any, between telecommunications and broadcasting.

Hypothesis: Online broadcast are distinctly different from other traditional forms of broadcast communication.

The Agent's statement clarified that the CRTC has clarified the distinction between telecommunications and broadcasting by exempting online broadcasts from CRTC control.  Definitely correct.

Tambahan pula, dengan memutuskan bahawa siaran dalam talian daripada penyiar tradisional, seperti stesen radio dan TV, akan dikecualikan daripada kawalan CRTC, agensi itu telah menangani kebimbangan khusus jawatankuasa yang mahu kerajaan menjelaskan perbezaan, jika ada, antara telekomunikasi dan penyiaran.

Siaran dalam talian jelas berbeza daripada bentuk komunikasi penyiaran tradisional yang lain.


Premise: And after she had spoken, Bertha Spahr also spoke, as well. She's the department chairperson, and, actually, I had her as a science teacher. And she presented information to the board, documents, that she and I believe other members of the science department had researched on, I guess cases that had been set down before on creationism in the public school system or something of that nature, just to show them that, you know, if they were still considering this idea, that they might, I don't know, be met with some litigation or something.

Hypothesis: Bertha Spahr knows how to teach people

Bertha Spahr was a teacher, so she knows how to teach people

Dan selepas dia bercakap, Bertha Spahr juga bercakap. Dia pengerusi jabatan, dan, sebenarnya, saya mempunyai dia sebagai guru sains. Dan dia membentangkan maklumat kepada lembaga, dokumen, yang dia dan saya percaya ahli jabatan sains yang lain telah meneliti, saya rasa kes-kes yang telah ditetapkan sebelum ini mengenai penciptaan dalam sistem sekolah awam atau sesuatu yang bersifat sedemikian, hanya untuk menunjukkan mereka yang, anda tahu, jika mereka masih mempertimbangkan idea ini, bahawa mereka mungkin, saya tidak tahu, akan menghadapi beberapa litigasi atau sesuatu.

Bertha Spahr tahu bagaimana untuk mengajar orang


Premise: We want to know is this government going to respect the democratic institutions of British Columbia and the democratic wish of the people of British Columbia to have a say on this treaty and a full debate, or is it going to bring in the treaty in lockstep with Glen Clark's government?

Hypothesis: The statement has less than 28 sentences

The statement has way less than 28 sentences!

Kami ingin tahu adakah kerajaan ini akan menghormati institusi demokrasi British Columbia dan hasrat demokrasi rakyat British Columbia untuk bersuara mengenai perjanjian ini dan perbahasan penuh, atau adakah ia akan membawa perjanjian itu secara berkunci dengan Kerajaan Glen Clark?

Penyataan mempunyai kurang daripada 28 ayat


Premise: The book you mentioned that Vice President Gore wrote, he also called for taxing -- big energy taxes in order to clean up the environment. And now that the energy prices are high, I guess he's not advocating those big energy taxes right now. I believe we ought to fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund to -- with half the money going to states so states can make the right decisions for environmental quality.

Hypothesis: Vice President Gore has a c

Buku yang anda sebutkan yang ditulis oleh Naib Presiden Gore, beliau juga meminta cukai -- cukai tenaga yang besar untuk membersihkan alam sekitar. Dan sekarang dengan harga tenaga yang tinggi, saya rasa dia tidak menyokong cukai tenaga yang besar itu sekarang. Saya percaya kita harus membiayai sepenuhnya Dana Pemuliharaan Tanah dan Air untuk -- dengan separuh daripada wang itu disalurkan kepada negeri supaya negeri boleh membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk kualiti alam sekitar.


Premise: In this regard, the Bloc Quebecois would have preferred that the Export Development Corporation draw more on the very simple and probably more effective operational framework of the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, since they require, for each sensitive project in a sensitive area, an impact study, public hearings and most importantly process transparency.

Hypothesis: The ability for the public to know its actions is very important to the World Bank

the World Bank requires, for each sensitive project in a sensitive area, an impact study, public hearings and most importantly process transparency.

Dalam hal ini, Blok Quebecois lebih suka bahawa Perbadanan Pembangunan Eksport menggunakan lebih banyak rangka kerja operasi Bank Dunia atau Bank Dunia untuk Pembinaan Semula dan Pembangunan yang sangat mudah dan mungkin lebih berkesan, kerana mereka memerlukan, untuk setiap projek sensitif dalam kawasan sensitif, kajian impak, pendengaran awam dan paling penting ketelusan proses.

Keupayaan untuk orang ramai mengetahui tindakannya adalah sangat penting kepada Bank Dunia


Premise: My friend, Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, is pushing a law to make sure that Arab-Americans are treated with respect. So racial profiling isn't just an issue at local police forces. It's an issue throughout our society. And as we become a diverse society, we're going to have to deal with it more and more.

Hypothesis: Senator Abraham did not speak these quotes.

The reason this is correct is because the context says, "My friend, Senator Abraham" implying that someone else has these thoughts, and not necessarily Senator Abraham.

Rakan saya, Senator Spencer Abraham dari Michigan, sedang mendesak undang-undang untuk memastikan orang Arab-Amerika dilayan dengan hormat. Jadi pemprofilan perkauman bukan hanya isu di pasukan polis tempatan. Ia adalah isu di seluruh masyarakat kita. Dan apabila kita menjadi masyarakat yang pelbagai, kita perlu menanganinya dengan lebih banyak lagi.

Senator Abraham tidak bercakap petikan ini.


Premise: While I found the country-wide consensus on this issue interesting, I found equally interesting the wide range of diversity within the system, among the universities, colleges, and technical schools scattered across the country - each with its own unique mission and mandate, and each responding to the particular needs of the community within which it is situated - working together to provide a post-secondary system of education that may well be second to none.

Hypothesis: This consensus involved multiple States.

If the consensus was Country wide it involved multiple states.

Walaupun saya mendapati konsensus seluruh negara mengenai isu ini menarik, saya mendapati sama menariknya dengan pelbagai kepelbagaian dalam sistem, antara universiti, kolej dan sekolah teknik yang tersebar di seluruh negara - masing-masing mempunyai misi dan mandat tersendiri, dan masing-masing bertindak balas kepada keperluan tertentu komuniti di mana ia berada - bekerjasama untuk menyediakan sistem pendidikan pasca menengah yang mungkin tiada tandingannya.

Konsensus ini melibatkan beberapa Negara.


Premise: This looks artificial when you're dealing with a fact witness, but these are fact witnesses who are also reporters, and I am straining to try to find a fair way to do this. I believe that to the extent -- and I've said this now several times -- that the reporters' testimony is necessary in order to invoke the residual hearsay exception under Rule 807, that the defendants have to have an opportunity to examine the reporters on the same topics and subjects that I would allow the plaintiffs to question them on during their case-in-chief, nothing more and nothing less.

Hypothesis: Should the hearsay exception be invoked, defendants would gain rights equal to the plaintiff.

The wording makes it clear that under rule 807 of the residual hearsay exception they would allow the defendants to examine the reporters on the same topics and subjects that they would allow the plaintiffs.

Ini kelihatan tiruan apabila anda berurusan dengan saksi fakta, tetapi ini adalah saksi fakta yang juga pemberita, dan saya berusaha untuk mencari cara yang adil untuk melakukan perkara ini. Saya percaya bahawa setakat -- dan saya telah mengatakan ini sekarang beberapa kali -- bahawa keterangan wartawan adalah perlu untuk menggunakan pengecualian dengar khabar sisa di bawah Peraturan 807, bahawa defendan perlu mempunyai peluang untuk memeriksa wartawan mengenai topik dan subjek yang sama yang saya akan membenarkan plaintif menyoal mereka semasa ketua kes mereka, tidak lebih dan tidak kurang.

Sekiranya pengecualian khabar angin digunakan, defendan akan mendapat hak yang sama dengan plaintif.


Premise: Instead of retreating to his ivory tower and dreaming up plans to limit the powers of Quebec's National Assembly, would the minister not be better advised to have a word with the Minister of Finance so that the next federal-provincial conference focuses on the real problem: getting the money to those who provide the services?

Hypothesis: The minister needs to be realistic and forget about limiting powers of the Assembly and focus on the real problem.

I indicated that the minister should "be realistic" due to the reference to "instead of retreating to his ivory tower..."

Daripada berundur ke menara gadingnya dan mengimpikan rancangan untuk mengehadkan kuasa Perhimpunan Kebangsaan Quebec, adakah menteri tidak lebih baik dinasihatkan untuk bercakap dengan Menteri Kewangan supaya persidangan persekutuan-wilayah seterusnya memberi tumpuan kepada masalah sebenar: mendapatkan wang kepada mereka yang menyediakan perkhidmatan?

Menteri perlu realistik dan melupakan mengehadkan kuasa perhimpunan dan memberi tumpuan kepada masalah sebenar.