Premise: Mr. Speaker, as we celebrate the 50th anniversaries of both the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the founding of the State of Israel I would like to thank the government House leader and the House leaders of all parties for taking a principled stand on the issue of the holocaust denial.

Hypothesis: UN Declaration of Human Rights is celebrating its 50th official week of commencement

50th anniversary means 50 years, not 50 weeks. The number 50 should trip the system unless it uses context well

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, semasa kita meraikan ulang tahun ke-50 Deklarasi Hak Asasi Manusia Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu dan penubuhan Negara Israel, saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada ketua Dewan kerajaan dan pemimpin Dewan semua pihak kerana mengambil pendirian berprinsip dalam isu penafian holocaust.

Deklarasi Hak Asasi Manusia PBB sedang meraikan minggu rasminya yang ke-50 bermula


Premise: I said I was upset about it because I didn't find a problem with it with my religion. It does not -- I'm getting confused. I have a problem with it because my daughter came home from school and she says to me, What kind of Christian are you, anyway? So that's why I have a problem with it.

Hypothesis: The speaker understands what is happening

Saya berkata saya kecewa kerana saya tidak menemui masalah dengan agama saya. Ia tidak -- saya semakin keliru. Saya mempunyai masalah dengannya kerana anak perempuan saya pulang dari sekolah dan dia berkata kepada saya, Apakah jenis orang Kristian anda, pula? Jadi itulah sebabnya saya mempunyai masalah dengannya.


Premise: Well, I understand, and Africa is important. And we've got to do a lot of work in Africa to promote democracy and trade, and there are some -- Vice President mentioned Nigeria is a fledgling democracy. We have to work with Nigeria. That's an important continent.

Hypothesis: More than two countries are mentioned in the text.

It's definitely incorrect because only one country, Nigeria, is mentioned in the text. It's difficult because it's never explicitly referred to as a country which probably causes the system to think the statement is unverifiable.

Saya faham, dan Afrika adalah penting. Dan kita perlu melakukan banyak kerja di Afrika untuk mempromosikan demokrasi dan perdagangan, dan terdapat beberapa -- Naib Presiden menyebut Nigeria adalah demokrasi yang masih baru. Kami perlu bekerjasama dengan Nigeria. Itu benua yang penting.

Lebih daripada dua negara disebut dalam teks.


Premise: We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified under ordinary First Amendment analysis or under a proper reading of the limits built into the Copyright 16 Clause.

Hypothesis: The First Amendment is an ordinary analysis act

The First Amendment isn't an act of analysis

Kami mahukan hak untuk menyalin karya verbatim yang sepatutnya berada dalam domain awam dan akan berada dalam domain awam tetapi untuk statut yang tidak boleh dibenarkan di bawah analisis Pindaan Pertama biasa atau di bawah bacaan yang betul tentang had yang terbina dalam Klausa Hak Cipta 16.

Pindaan Pertama ialah akta analisis biasa


Premise: The statements I make or the statements that I do not make in my classroom tell my students something. So I think we're charged with, you know, having an ethical decision to make when we walk into the classroom, the things that we say and the things that we do, and so I think that's very important.

Hypothesis: The writer is a student in a classroom.

The writer talks about "my classroom" and "my students", so he/she is definitely a teacher, not a student. Not sure how the model missed this; maybe because it mentions students.

Kenyataan yang saya buat atau kenyataan yang saya tidak buat di dalam bilik darjah saya memberitahu pelajar saya sesuatu. Jadi saya rasa kita didakwa, anda tahu, mempunyai keputusan beretika yang perlu dibuat apabila kita masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, perkara yang kita perkatakan dan perkara yang kita lakukan, jadi saya fikir itu sangat penting.

Penulis adalah seorang pelajar di dalam bilik darjah.


Premise: Since the beginning of this parliament, every time they were given the opportunity, the members of the Bloc Quebecois-at least those who sit on the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade-have asked the government to be more transparent on this issue, by agreeing to table before parliament not only treaties like the ones dealing with extradition and social security, but all treaties.

Hypothesis: All members of the Bloc Quebecois sit on the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade.

The text says "members of the Bloc Quebecois- AT LEAST THOSE who sit on the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. By inference [which the model missed], not all members are on this committee.

Sejak awal parlimen ini, setiap kali mereka diberi peluang, ahli-ahli Blok Quebecois-sekurang-kurangnya mereka yang menganggotai Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar Negeri dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa-telah meminta kerajaan lebih telus dalam isu ini, dengan bersetuju untuk membentangkan di hadapan parlimen bukan sahaja perjanjian seperti yang berkaitan dengan ekstradisi dan keselamatan sosial, tetapi semua perjanjian.

Semua ahli Bloc Quebecois menganggotai Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar Negeri dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa.


Premise: Five million Americans have lost their health insurance in this country. You've got about a million right here in Arizona, just shy, 950,000, who have no health insurance at all. 82,000 Arizonians lost their health insurance under President Bush's watch. 223,000 kids in Arizona have no health insurance at all.

Hypothesis: 25% of Americans who lost their health insurance come from Arizona.

25% of 5 million is 1.25 million and not 950,000 people.

Lima juta rakyat Amerika telah kehilangan insurans kesihatan mereka di negara ini. Anda mempunyai kira-kira satu juta di sini di Arizona, hanya pemalu, 950,000, yang tidak mempunyai insurans kesihatan langsung. 82,000 warga Arizona kehilangan insurans kesihatan mereka di bawah pengawasan Presiden Bush. 223,000 kanak-kanak di Arizona tidak mempunyai insurans kesihatan sama sekali.

25% rakyat Amerika yang kehilangan insurans kesihatan mereka berasal dari Arizona.


Premise: As a result of the increased taxes announced on February 13, 1998, excise taxes on cigarettes and tobacco sticks vary from $2.25 to $5.35 for a carton of cigarettes and from $1.85 to $2.93 for a carton of tobacco sticks, depending in which province the tobacco products are offered for sale.

Hypothesis: Increased taxes were the announced the year prior to 2000.

Increased taxes were announced in 1998. The system was confused by the year.

Hasil daripada kenaikan cukai yang diumumkan pada 13 Februari 1998, cukai eksais ke atas rokok dan batang tembakau berbeza-beza dari $2.25 hingga $5.35 untuk satu karton rokok dan dari $1.85 hingga $2.93 untuk satu karton batang tembakau, bergantung di wilayah mana produk tembakau ditawarkan untuk dijual.

Peningkatan cukai telah diumumkan pada tahun sebelum 2000.


Premise: Well, you know, certainly what is happening in the country today in the way of congressional -- under the Commerce Clause is totally different than what the Framers had in mind, but we've never felt that that was the criterion. What the Framers thought of, there weren't steamboats, there weren't railroads.

Hypothesis: their were sidewalks in the framers mind.

Anda tahu, apa yang berlaku di negara hari ini mengikut cara kongres -- di bawah Klausa Perdagangan adalah berbeza sama sekali daripada apa yang difikirkan oleh Framers, tetapi kami tidak pernah merasakan bahawa itu adalah kriterianya. Apa yang difikirkan oleh Framers, tidak ada kapal wap, tidak ada kereta api.

mereka adalah kaki lima dalam fikiran pembingkai.


Premise: On March 11, 1996, Mickey Kantor, the American trade secretary, announced that he was filing a complaint with the World Trade Organization to protest, first, the 80% excise tax on split run magazines under Bill C-103, second, the lower postal rates granted Canadian publications, third, the postal subsidy and, fourth, tariff 9958 making it illegal to import split runs into Canada.

Hypothesis: Mickey Kantor made five different complaints

The context lists four different complaints, not five, so it is incorrect to say he complained five times. The system likely had difficulty counting the exact number of complaints.

Pada 11 Mac 1996, Mickey Kantor, setiausaha perdagangan Amerika, mengumumkan bahawa dia memfailkan aduan dengan Pertubuhan Perdagangan Dunia untuk membantah, pertama, cukai eksais 80% ke atas majalah split run di bawah Bill C-103, kedua, yang lebih rendah. kadar pos yang diberikan kepada penerbitan Kanada, ketiga, subsidi pos dan, keempat, tarif 9958 menjadikannya haram untuk mengimport split run ke Kanada.

Mickey Kantor membuat lima aduan berbeza


Premise: I dare not say it was a revelation to him because he was already quite aware of the problem, but he came face to face with it and was able to see with his own eyes-the member for Chambly is a hands-on kind of guy-how important low income housing, co-op housing, is in terms of social action.

Hypothesis: Co-op housing and low income housing are the same thing.

They are mentioned together but likely both terms would not be separately mentioned if they meant the same thing.

Saya tidak berani mengatakan itu adalah pendedahan kepadanya kerana dia sudah cukup sedar tentang masalah itu, tetapi dia bersemuka dengannya dan dapat melihat dengan matanya sendiri-ahli untuk Chambly adalah seorang lelaki yang handal. -betapa pentingnya perumahan berpendapatan rendah, perumahan koperasi, dari segi tindakan sosial.

Perumahan koperasi dan perumahan berpendapatan rendah adalah perkara yang sama.


Premise: Unfortunately I was in the restroom at the time that Max Pell was speaking because -- my husband told you I was eight months pregnant. I was actually nine months pregnant and due any day, so I spent quite a deal of time in the restroom. But I had excused myself to go to the restroom just after Barrie did this whole thing.

Hypothesis: She had to deliver a baby in the restroom at the time that Max Pell was speaking because she was actually 9 months pregnant and due any day.

She had to pee; not deliver a baby. I think the system didn't know she had to pee by the context clues.

Malangnya saya berada di tandas pada masa Max Pell bercakap kerana -- suami saya memberitahu anda saya hamil lapan bulan. Saya sebenarnya hamil sembilan bulan dan akan tiba pada bila-bila masa, jadi saya menghabiskan banyak masa di tandas. Tetapi saya telah meminta diri untuk pergi ke tandas selepas Barrie melakukan semua ini.

Dia terpaksa melahirkan bayi di tandas pada masa Max Pell bercakap kerana dia sebenarnya hamil 9 bulan dan akan bersalin pada bila-bila masa.


Premise: What I've done is, it says that there's no extraneous unpublished material questioning. That's the clarity that I need. And then, quite frankly, my mindset is, if the issue of the defendants is that we were biased in our reporting because we either misquoted somebody or whatever, well, this isn't a jury trial.

Hypothesis: The person admits to being biased

Apa yang saya lakukan ialah, ia mengatakan bahawa tidak ada pertanyaan bahan yang tidak diterbitkan. Itulah kejelasan yang saya perlukan. Dan kemudian, terus terang, pemikiran saya adalah, jika isu defendan adalah bahawa kami berat sebelah dalam pelaporan kami kerana kami salah petik seseorang atau apa sahaja, ini bukan perbicaraan juri.


Premise: The first priority has to be on ending the violence, dampening down the tensions that have arisen there. We need to call upon Syria to release the three Israeli soldiers who have been captured. We need to insist that Arafat send out instructions to halt some of the provocative acts of violence that have been going on.

Hypothesis: Syria needs to release at least 4 soldiers.

We need to call upon Syria to release the three Israeli soldiers. The system was confused by the number.

Keutamaan pertama adalah untuk menamatkan keganasan, meredakan ketegangan yang timbul di sana. Kita perlu menyeru Syria untuk membebaskan tiga tentera Israel yang telah ditangkap. Kita perlu bertegas bahawa Arafat menghantar arahan untuk menghentikan beberapa tindakan provokasi keganasan yang telah berlaku.

Syria perlu membebaskan sekurang-kurangnya 4 tentera.


Premise: Now, we offer a simple way to make this clear, express limit make sense, and that is precisely the understanding we suggest that existed in 1790. The only precedents that existed in 1790 were precedents of setting a term, and then when parliament was asked in 1735, '37, and '39 to extend it, they rejected it, and as amicus historians said, they rejected it because, as a pamphleteer described it, that would be effectively a perpetual term.

Hypothesis: they wanted to make things confusing.

if they wanted to  a simple way to make things clear, they didn't want to confused nobody.

Sekarang, kami menawarkan cara mudah untuk membuat had yang jelas dan nyata ini masuk akal, dan itulah pemahaman yang kami cadangkan yang wujud pada tahun 1790. Satu-satunya preseden yang wujud pada tahun 1790 ialah preseden menetapkan penggal, dan kemudian apabila parlimen ditanya pada tahun 1735, '37, dan '39 untuk memanjangkannya, mereka menolaknya, dan seperti yang dikatakan oleh ahli sejarah amicus, mereka menolaknya kerana, seperti yang diterangkan oleh seorang penulis risalah, itu akan menjadi istilah yang kekal.

mereka mahu membuat perkara mengelirukan.


Premise: Now, it's very important for our citizens to also know that I don't believe we ought to have amnesty. I don't think we ought to reward illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line to become a citizen. And we ought not to crowd these people ahead of them in line.

Hypothesis: The topic is gun control

Sekarang, adalah sangat penting bagi rakyat kita untuk mengetahui bahawa saya tidak percaya kita sepatutnya mempunyai pengampunan. Saya rasa kita tidak patut memberi ganjaran kepada tingkah laku yang menyalahi undang-undang. Terdapat ramai orang berdiri dalam barisan untuk menjadi warganegara. Dan kita tidak sepatutnya menyesakkan orang-orang ini mendahului mereka dalam barisan.


Premise: My sister had graduated that year, and I attended the commencement ceremony. And she had talked about Visigoths and things like that that she had spoken about in her commencement speech. And essentially she was speaking up for the teachers and the biology textbook.

Hypothesis: Their sister only discussed Visigoths

From the context it says their sister spoke about ' Visigoths and things like that' so the inference from 'things like that' is that they must have spoken about other things. The system could likely not make this inference

Kakak saya telah menamatkan pengajian pada tahun itu, dan saya menghadiri majlis perasmian. Dan dia telah bercakap tentang Visigoth dan perkara-perkara seperti yang dia telah bercakap tentang dalam ucapan permulaannya. Dan pada dasarnya dia bercakap untuk guru dan buku teks biologi.

Kakak mereka hanya membincangkan tentang Visigoth


Premise: The act provides that it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death, or in cases where the accused has already been found guilty of an offence related to the death.

Hypothesis: if the injures happened less then 5 years ago then no consent is needed from the attorney general

It is incorrect cause if the injury happened 3 or more years ago the must seek consent

Akta itu memperuntukkan bahawa adalah perlu untuk mendapatkan persetujuan peguam negara sebelum memulakan prosiding berkenaan dengan kesalahan apabila didakwa bahawa kecederaan yang menyebabkan kematian dialami lebih daripada tiga tahun sebelum kematian, atau dalam kes di mana tertuduh telah pun didapati bersalah atas kesalahan berkaitan kematian.

jika kecederaan berlaku kurang daripada 5 tahun yang lalu maka tiada kebenaran diperlukan daripada peguam negara


Premise: Jim, I hope that we can come back to the subject of education because the governor made an extensive statement on it and I have a very different view than the one he expressed. But that having been said, I believe that -- well, first of all, let me say that the governor and I agree on some things where this subject is concerned.

Hypothesis: The person is speaking directly to the governor in this context

The first sentence indicates that the person is speaking to Jim, because they address Jim directly. They then address the the governor in third person indicating that Jim is not the governor and thus, they are not speaking directly to the governor in this context.

Jim, saya harap kita boleh kembali kepada subjek pendidikan kerana gabenor membuat kenyataan yang luas mengenainya dan saya mempunyai pandangan yang sangat berbeza daripada yang beliau nyatakan. Tetapi setelah diperkatakan, saya percaya bahawa -- baik, pertama sekali, izinkan saya mengatakan bahawa gabenor dan saya bersetuju dengan beberapa perkara yang berkaitan dengan perkara ini.

Orang itu bercakap terus kepada gabenor dalam konteks ini


Premise: Instead of changing the balance in favour of the unions, prohibiting employers to use scabs brings the forces back into balance to a point that favours more reasonable negotiations where both employer and union work to quickly find a common ground, develop relations that will enable them to reconcile their divergent interests and find solutions that reflect their convergent interests.

Hypothesis: The balance should be changed in favor of the unions whenever they are protesting

Giving into the union's demand is not always the best solution

Daripada menukar keseimbangan yang memihak kepada kesatuan sekerja, melarang majikan menggunakan scabs membawa kuasa kembali seimbang ke tahap yang memihak kepada rundingan yang lebih munasabah di mana kedua-dua majikan dan kesatuan bekerja untuk segera mencari titik persamaan, membangunkan hubungan yang akan membolehkan mereka untuk mendamaikan kepentingan mereka yang berbeza dan mencari penyelesaian yang mencerminkan kepentingan konvergen mereka.

Imbangan harus diubah memihak kepada kesatuan sekerja setiap kali mereka membuat bantahan


Premise: At this milestone in our history, I encourage honourable senators to reflect on the events of December 6, 1989, and to do what you can to ensure that we have -and to the extent that we have not, that we strive to have - a society where there is respect and harmony between men and women.

Hypothesis: I encourage honourable senators to reflect on the events of the year prior to 1991.

I encourage honourable senators to reflect on the events of 1989. The system was confused by the year.

Pada peristiwa penting ini dalam sejarah kita, saya menggalakkan para senator yang berhormat untuk merenung peristiwa 6 Disember 1989, dan melakukan apa yang anda boleh untuk memastikan bahawa kita mempunyai - dan setakat yang kita tidak, yang kita berusaha untuk mempunyai - a masyarakat di mana wujudnya rasa hormat dan keharmonian antara lelaki dan wanita.

Saya menggalakkan senator yang berhormat untuk merenung peristiwa tahun sebelum 1991.


Premise: It's certainly the case that we are asserting, in light of the changed circumstances, that the opportunity to build upon works within the public domain is a fundamental First Amendment interest, and that the First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case, is that the public domain be permitted as a source for cultivating work about our culture without unnecessary legal restriction.

Hypothesis: First Amendment has a xx

Sememangnya, kami menegaskan, berdasarkan keadaan yang berubah, bahawa peluang untuk membina kerja dalam domain awam adalah kepentingan Pindaan Pertama yang asas, dan nilai Pindaan Pertama, kepentingan ucapan penting yang dipertaruhkan dalam kes ini, ialah domain awam dibenarkan sebagai sumber untuk memupuk karya tentang budaya kita tanpa sekatan undang-undang yang tidak perlu.


Premise: No. That's too amorphous a question. The issue here, I'll restate, is the veracity of the articles themselves, did the reporter hear the statement as reported. If it was taken out of context, we're not going to delve into that in this examination. The individual who believes -- who was quoted and believes the statement was taken out of context or flatly that he didn't or she didn't say it and it's inaccurate will have the opportunity to say that during the defendants case-in-chief or at any other time during the trial.

Hypothesis: The reporter questioned whether the statement was factual.

From the paragraph it appears that the reporter wrote what they thought that they heard without doing any factual checking. The system did not understand this.

Tidak. Itu soalan yang terlalu amorf. Isu di sini, saya akan nyatakan semula, adalah kebenaran artikel itu sendiri, adakah wartawan mendengar kenyataan seperti yang dilaporkan. Jika ia diambil di luar konteks, kita tidak akan menyelidikinya dalam peperiksaan ini. Individu yang percaya -- yang dipetik dan percaya kenyataan itu diambil di luar konteks atau secara terang-terangan bahawa dia tidak atau dia tidak mengatakannya dan ia tidak tepat akan berpeluang untuk mengatakan bahawa semasa ketua kes defendan atau pada bila-bila masa lain semasa perbicaraan.

Wartawan itu mempersoalkan sama ada kenyataan itu adalah fakta.


Premise: I think it's a triumph. I thought the president made the right decision in joining NATO and bombing Serbia. I supported them when they did so. I called upon the Congress not to hamstring the administration, and in terms of forcing troop withdrawals on a timetable that wasn't necessarily in our best interest or fit our nation's strategy, and so I think it's good public policy, I think it worked, and I'm pleased I took -- made the decision I made.

Hypothesis: Serbia joined NATO before the bombing.

The speaker indicates that NATO bombed Serbia, not that Serbia joined NATO.

Saya rasa ia satu kejayaan. Saya fikir presiden membuat keputusan yang tepat dalam menyertai NATO dan mengebom Serbia. Saya menyokong mereka apabila mereka berbuat demikian. Saya menyeru Kongres untuk tidak menyekat pentadbiran, dan dari segi memaksa pengunduran tentera pada jadual waktu yang tidak semestinya untuk kepentingan terbaik kita atau sesuai dengan strategi negara kita, dan oleh itu saya fikir ia adalah dasar awam yang baik, saya fikir ia berkesan, dan saya gembira saya mengambil -- membuat keputusan yang saya buat.

Serbia menyertai NATO sebelum pengeboman.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, on Friday, in reply to a question, the Minister of Canadian Heritage said in this House that the Americans had made a written commitment not to react to her subsidy program for Canadian publishers who, as we know, are the big losers in the agreement reached regarding Bill C-55.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Canadian Heritage is a man.

It uses the pronoun her, she is female, not a man.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, pada hari Jumaat, dalam menjawab soalan, Menteri Warisan Kanada berkata di Dewan ini bahawa Amerika telah membuat komitmen bertulis untuk tidak bertindak balas terhadap program subsidinya untuk penerbit Kanada yang, seperti yang kita tahu, adalah yang rugi besar. dalam perjanjian yang dicapai mengenai Rang Undang-Undang C-55.

Menteri Warisan Kanada adalah seorang lelaki.


Premise: To the people of the south shore, the volunteers, the volunteer fire-fighters, ground search and rescue, Coast Guard, emergency health services, soldiers, sailors, aircrew, RCMP and the Halifax fire and police services, I extend not only my own personal gratitude but also the gratitude of all Nova Scotians.

Hypothesis: I extend gratitude to the people of south shore, volunteers, search and rescue, president of the united states and others.

the author didn't say anything about president of the united states

Kepada penduduk pantai selatan, sukarelawan, bomba sukarela, mencari dan menyelamat darat, Pengawal Pantai, perkhidmatan kesihatan kecemasan, askar, kelasi, anak kapal, RCMP dan perkhidmatan bomba dan polis Halifax, saya bukan sahaja memperluaskan perkhidmatan saya sendiri. terima kasih peribadi tetapi juga terima kasih semua Nova Scotians.

Saya mengucapkan terima kasih kepada penduduk pantai selatan, sukarelawan, mencari dan menyelamat, presiden Amerika Syarikat dan lain-lain.


Premise: All right. We will reconvene a little later tomorrow, at 9:30 a.m., because of some matters that I must attend to, and the session will go longer. With everybody's indulgence, I would expect to go to approximately 5 o'clock, no later than 5 o'clock tomorrow to make up for the time that we lose during the morning session. So we will stand in recess until 9:30 a.m. on Thursday. We thank you all.

Hypothesis: The meeting is expected to go past 6 PM

The meeting is expected to go no further than 5 PM.

Baiklah. Kami akan bersidang semula sedikit lewat esok, jam 9:30 pagi, kerana beberapa perkara yang perlu saya uruskan, dan sesi itu akan berlangsung lebih lama. Dengan kelonggaran semua orang, saya menjangkakan untuk pergi ke kira-kira pukul 5, selewat-lewatnya pukul 5 esok untuk menebus masa yang kita kalah semasa sesi pagi. Jadi kami akan berehat sehingga jam 9:30 pagi pada hari Khamis. Kami berterima kasih kepada anda semua.

Mesyuarat dijangka melepasi jam 6 petang


Premise: Your Committee, to which was referred Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, has examined the said Bill in obedience to its Order of Reference dates, Wednesday, February 17, 1999, and now reports the same without amendment.

Hypothesis: The Order of Reference date mentioned is over 50 years old.

It was only in 1999 which is certainly not over 50 years old. It's difficult because the system has trouble comparing dates when the statement is definitely incorrect for some reason.

Jawatankuasa anda, yang kepadanya telah dirujuk Rang Undang-undang C-35, Akta untuk meminda Akta Langkah Import Khas dan Akta Tribunal Perdagangan Antarabangsa Kanada, telah meneliti Rang Undang-undang tersebut sebagai mematuhi tarikh Perintah Rujukannya, Rabu, 17 Februari 1999, dan kini melaporkan perkara yang sama tanpa pindaan.

Tarikh Perintah Rujukan yang dinyatakan adalah melebihi 50 tahun.


Premise: And the compounding rate of interest effect will make it more likely that the Social Security system is solvent for our children and our grandchildren. I will work with Republicans and Democrats. It'll be a vital issue in my second term. It is an issue that I am willing to take on, and so I'll bring Republicans and Democrats together.

Hypothesis: The speaker is in his second term.

Dan kadar kompaun kesan faedah akan menjadikannya lebih berkemungkinan bahawa sistem Keselamatan Sosial adalah pelarut untuk anak-anak dan cucu-cucu kita. Saya akan bekerjasama dengan Republikan dan Demokrat. Ia akan menjadi isu penting dalam penggal kedua saya. Ia adalah isu yang saya bersedia untuk mengambilnya, dan oleh itu saya akan membawa Republikan dan Demokrat bersama-sama.


Premise: Thirdly, one of the reasons why there's still high cost in medicine is because this is -- they don't use any information technology. It's like if you looked at the -- it's the equivalent of the buggy and horse days, compared to other industries here in America.

Hypothesis: In this snippet, three reasons are given for the high cost in medicine.

Only the third reason is given and explained, but the model thinks the mention "thirdly" means 3 reasons are given here.

Ketiga, salah satu sebab mengapa masih terdapat kos yang tinggi dalam perubatan adalah kerana ini adalah -- mereka tidak menggunakan sebarang teknologi maklumat. Ia seperti jika anda melihat -- ia adalah setara dengan zaman kereta dan kuda, berbanding dengan industri lain di Amerika.

Dalam coretan ini, tiga sebab diberikan untuk kos perubatan yang tinggi.


Premise: If Senator Ghitter is correct about his interpretation of the motion, that would mean that the committee adopted a proposition that was contrary to the Rules of the Senate while he was in the chair; that he and the other committee members and the clerk of the committee understood this motion to mean that he had to report by twelve noon today, even though the Senate would not be sitting until 4 p.m. today; and that no one, including himself, knew that this would be contrary to the rules.

Hypothesis: The Rules of the Senate account for the Senate not sitting until 4pm today.

The rules of the senat do not account for the senate not sitting until 4pm.

Jika Senator Ghitter betul tentang tafsirannya terhadap usul itu, ini bermakna jawatankuasa itu menerima pakai cadangan yang bertentangan dengan Peraturan Dewan Negara semasa beliau berada di kerusi; bahawa beliau dan ahli jawatankuasa yang lain dan kerani jawatankuasa itu memahami usul ini bermakna beliau perlu melaporkan diri pada pukul dua belas tengah hari ini, walaupun Dewan Negara tidak akan bersidang sehingga pukul 4 petang. hari ini; dan tiada siapa, termasuk dirinya, tahu bahawa ini akan bertentangan dengan peraturan.

Peraturan Dewan Negara memperkirakan Dewan Negara tidak bersidang sehingga jam 4 petang hari ini.


Premise: He voted to violate the budget cap 277 times. You know, there's a main stream in American politics and you sit right on the far left bank. As a matter of fact, your record is such that Ted Kennedy, your colleague, is the conservative senator from Massachusetts.

Hypothesis: Ted Kennedy's first name is Teddity.

Ted Kennedy's first name is Ted, not Teddity, so the statement is definitely incorrect.

Beliau mengundi untuk melanggar had bajet sebanyak 277 kali. Anda tahu, terdapat aliran utama dalam politik Amerika dan anda duduk betul-betul di tebing paling kiri. Sebenarnya, rekod anda ialah Ted Kennedy, rakan sekerja anda, adalah senator konservatif dari Massachusetts.


Premise: But as we respect someone's rights, and as we profess tolerance, we shouldn't change -- or have to change -- our basic views on the sanctity of marriage. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I think it's very important that we protect marriage as an institution, between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes that two men should be able to marry each other.

It's definitely incorrect because he clearly believes that marriage should only take place between a man and a woman. It's difficult because I used similar words from the text I suppose which confused the system.

Tetapi apabila kita menghormati hak seseorang, dan semasa kita mengaku toleransi, kita tidak sepatutnya mengubah -- atau perlu mengubah -- pandangan asas kita tentang kesucian perkahwinan. Saya percaya pada kesucian perkahwinan. Saya fikir adalah sangat penting untuk kita melindungi perkahwinan sebagai sebuah institusi, antara seorang lelaki dan seorang wanita.

Penceramah percaya bahawa dua lelaki sepatutnya boleh berkahwin antara satu sama lain.


Premise: This president has taken a $5. 6 trillion surplus and turned it into deficits as far as the eye can see. Health-care costs for the average American have gone up 64 percent; tuitions have gone up 35 percent; gasoline prices up 30 percent; Medicare premiums went up 17 percent a few days ago; prescription drugs are up 12 percent a year.

Hypothesis: Medicare premiums went up 17 percent last year.

Medicare premiums went up 17 percent a few days ago, not last year.

Presiden ini telah mengambil $5. 6 trilion lebihan dan mengubahnya menjadi defisit sejauh mata memandang. Kos penjagaan kesihatan untuk purata Amerika telah meningkat 64 peratus; tuisyen telah meningkat 35 peratus; harga petrol naik 30 peratus; Premium Medicare naik 17 peratus beberapa hari lalu; ubat preskripsi meningkat 12 peratus setahun.

Premium Medicare naik 17 peratus tahun lepas.


Premise: Yeah, no question about that, but there also needs to be strong enforcement of the law. Some kid who feels like -- doesn't matter where the gun comes from, it could be a cheap gun, expensive gun. What matters is something in this person's head says there is not going to be a consequence.

Hypothesis: there also needs to be an absent of enforcement of the law in order to enjoy life better

Ya, tiada persoalan tentang itu, tetapi juga perlu ada penguatkuasaan undang-undang yang kuat. Sesetengah kanak-kanak yang berasa seperti -- tidak kira dari mana pistol itu datang, ia boleh menjadi pistol murah, pistol mahal. Apa yang penting adalah sesuatu dalam kepala orang ini mengatakan tidak akan ada akibatnya.

terdapat juga ketiadaan penguatkuasaan undang-undang untuk menikmati kehidupan dengan lebih baik


Premise: The petitioners call on Parliament to immediately withdraw from all arrangements concerning financial and technical assistance to China for nuclear reactor technology, and to ensure that the Government of Canada does not finance or subsidize the sale of Candu reactors to China or any other country.

Hypothesis: Government of Canada does not finance or subsidize the sale of Candu reactors to China but other countries

Pempetisyen menyeru Parlimen untuk segera menarik diri daripada semua pengaturan mengenai bantuan kewangan dan teknikal kepada China untuk teknologi reaktor nuklear, dan untuk memastikan bahawa Kerajaan Kanada tidak membiayai atau mensubsidi penjualan reaktor Candu ke China atau mana-mana negara lain.

Kerajaan Kanada tidak membiayai atau mensubsidi penjualan reaktor Candu ke China tetapi negara lain


Premise: And it's important, Jim, not only -- not just because of Texas, but because this mirrors the national controversy. There is pending now in the Congress a national hate crimes law because of James Byrd, because of Matthew Shepard, who was crucified on a split rail fence by bigots, and because of others.

Hypothesis: Magic Bird is a reason for the new law

Dan ini penting, Jim, bukan sahaja -- bukan hanya kerana Texas, tetapi kerana ini mencerminkan kontroversi negara. Terdapat undang-undang jenayah kebencian kebangsaan yang belum selesai sekarang kerana James Byrd, kerana Matthew Shepard, yang telah disalibkan di atas pagar kereta api yang terbelah oleh orang fanatik, dan kerana orang lain.

Burung Ajaib adalah alasan untuk undang-undang baru


Premise: Curriculum that works and phonics needs to be an integral part of our reading curriculum. Intensive reading laboratories, teacher retraining. I mean, there needs to be a wholesale effort against racial profiling, which is illiterate children. We can do better in our public schools.

Hypothesis: Only children from ethnic minorities are illiterate.

It is not just children from ethnic minorities that can be illiterate.

Kurikulum yang berfungsi dan fonik perlu menjadi sebahagian daripada kurikulum membaca kita. Makmal bacaan intensif, latihan semula guru. Maksud saya, perlu ada usaha borong menentang pemprofilan kaum, iaitu kanak-kanak buta huruf. Kita boleh melakukan yang lebih baik di sekolah awam kita.

Hanya kanak-kanak daripada etnik minoriti yang buta huruf.


Premise: I would like to ask my hon. colleague if he sees any relationship between the justices, their influence by the law schools, by the lawyers of the community of which they are a part and if this is part of the reason that these justices are being given these pay raises that perhaps other frontline bureaucrats and government workers are not entitled to.

Hypothesis: The speaker trust where the money is going and why

The speaker is questioning the money which make it incorrect

Saya ingin bertanya kepada tuan saya. rakan sekerjanya jika dia melihat apa-apa hubungan antara hakim, pengaruh mereka oleh sekolah undang-undang, oleh peguam masyarakat di mana mereka adalah sebahagian daripadanya dan jika ini adalah sebahagian daripada sebab hakim ini diberi kenaikan gaji ini yang mungkin barisan hadapan lain birokrat dan pekerja kerajaan tidak berhak.

Penceramah mempercayai ke mana wang itu pergi dan mengapa


Premise: The bill relates specifically to the fact that under the current provisions of the legislation, if a bill arrives in the hands of a member or a candidate following the election, if it was not received within the required time period in which a candidate or his or her official agent may pay the bill, the only process available now to the member to be able to pay that bill is to get a court order allowing that to happen.

Hypothesis: the bill is a sloth

this is incorrect as a bill cannot be a sloth which is an animal

Rang undang-undang itu berkaitan secara khusus dengan fakta bahawa di bawah peruntukan semasa undang-undang, jika rang undang-undang tiba di tangan ahli atau calon selepas pilihan raya, jika ia tidak diterima dalam tempoh masa yang diperlukan di mana calon atau calonnya. ejen rasminya boleh membayar bil, satu-satunya proses yang tersedia sekarang kepada ahli untuk dapat membayar bil itu ialah mendapatkan perintah mahkamah yang membenarkan perkara itu berlaku.


Premise: Well, that's what I'm not going to get into. And I understand and I respect that argument. But I think I've got to line-draw here someplace. And I understood that argument before. And what I don't want to do here is turn this into an oral argument on things that I've already decided. And I know you respect that.

Hypothesis: They dont want a visual argument

Nah, itu yang saya tidak akan masuk ke dalam. Dan saya faham dan saya hormati hujah itu. Tetapi saya rasa saya perlu membuat garisan di sini di suatu tempat. Dan saya faham hujah itu sebelum ini. Dan apa yang saya tidak mahu lakukan di sini ialah menjadikan ini sebagai hujah lisan mengenai perkara yang telah saya putuskan. Dan saya tahu awak menghormatinya.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, considering that the value of water cannot be measured in dollars because it is priceless, will the federal government assert its jurisdiction over the export of water and take without delay the steps necessary to ensure that water will never be exported from Canada?

Hypothesis: Water has a price, in the opinion of the person speaking.

The person speaking says to Mr Speaker "the value of water cannot be measured in dollars because it is priceless" - so it does not have a price. Maybe the model was fooled by "Mr Speaker" [who is not speaking] or by "priceless".

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, memandangkan nilai air tidak boleh diukur dalam dolar kerana ia tidak ternilai, adakah kerajaan persekutuan akan menegaskan bidang kuasanya ke atas eksport air dan mengambil tanpa berlengah-lengah langkah yang perlu untuk memastikan air tidak akan dieksport dari Kanada?

Air mempunyai harga, pada pendapat orang yang bercakap.


Premise: Even youths will fade and be weary and the young will fall exhausted, but those who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength, they shall mount up with wings like eagles, they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint, but Sandra, they'll have to be in good shape to keep up with you.

Hypothesis: Those who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength, they shall mount up and turn into eagles.

It's definitely incorrect because they're speaking metaphorically about gaining strength and stamina and not literally saying they will get wings like an eagle. It's difficult because it's hard for AI to understand metaphorical speech.

Orang-orang muda pun akan menjadi pudar dan letih, dan orang-orang muda akan jatuh lelah, tetapi orang-orang yang menanti-nantikan Tuhan akan diperbaharui kekuatannya, mereka akan terbang dengan sayap seperti burung rajawali, mereka akan berlari dan tidak menjadi lesu, mereka berjalan dan tidak menjadi lesu, tetapi Sandra, mereka perlu berada dalam keadaan yang baik untuk bersaing dengan anda.

Mereka yang menantikan Tuhan akan diperbaharui kekuatannya, mereka akan naik dan berubah menjadi burung rajawali.


Premise: Thereafter, in 1831, 1909, 1976, and 1998, and in numerous private copyright bills and temporary extensions of the copyright law and in repeated patent law revisions, Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright and patent protection of subsisting works.

Hypothesis: Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright five separate times.

The original statement says that Congress extended the terms of Federal copyright in 1831, 1909, 1976, and 1998, which is four times, not five. The system was fooled by this because it was not focused on the amount of times copyright has been extended by Congress.

Selepas itu, pada tahun 1831, 1909, 1976, dan 1998, dan dalam banyak rang undang-undang hak cipta persendirian dan lanjutan sementara undang-undang hak cipta dan dalam semakan undang-undang paten berulang, Kongres melanjutkan syarat hak cipta Persekutuan dan perlindungan paten bagi karya yang masih ada.

Kongres melanjutkan syarat hak cipta Persekutuan lima kali berasingan.


Premise: Therefore I am very pleased to indicate to the member that within the next couple of weeks we will make available a service charge calculator free of charge on our website, Strategis, that will enable consumers to compare the charges levied against them by a variety of financial institutions and see in a very transparent and rapid way where the best services charges can be obtained.

Hypothesis: The service calculator will be shipped by mail.

The service calculator is available on the website, it is not a tangible item to be shipped in the mail. therefore my statement is incorrect. I'm not sure why it was difficult for the system.

Oleh itu, saya amat berbesar hati untuk menyatakan kepada ahli bahawa dalam beberapa minggu akan datang kami akan menyediakan kalkulator caj perkhidmatan secara percuma di laman web kami, Strategis, yang akan membolehkan pengguna membandingkan caj yang dikenakan terhadap mereka oleh pelbagai jenis kewangan. institusi dan lihat dengan cara yang sangat telus dan pantas di mana caj perkhidmatan terbaik boleh diperolehi.

Kalkulator perkhidmatan akan dihantar melalui pos.


Premise: The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, and taking into account collective agreements entered into by the employer in respect of bargaining units in the Public Service since the Public Sector Compensation Act ceased to apply to compensation plans applicable to them-

Hypothesis: The Public Sector Compensation Act applies compensation plans.

The system saw much of the statement and decided to ignore the term ceased and how it applied.

Gabenor dalam Majlis boleh, atas syor Lembaga Perbendaharaan, dan mengambil kira perjanjian kolektif yang dibuat oleh majikan berkenaan dengan unit tawar-menawar dalam Perkhidmatan Awam sejak Akta Pampasan Sektor Awam tidak lagi terpakai kepada pelan pampasan yang terpakai kepada mereka-

Akta Pampasan Sektor Awam mengguna pakai pelan pampasan.


Premise: Well, I think that you reserved that argument. We've had that discussion. I'm inclined -- because it's a bench trial, I'll admit it conditionally. Whether I'll consider it in my ultimate determination will be a function of the argument that I'm allowing you to reserve and make.

Hypothesis: argument has a z

Nah, saya fikir anda menyimpan hujah itu. Kami telah mengadakan perbincangan itu. Saya cenderung -- kerana ia adalah perbicaraan bangku simpanan, saya akan mengakuinya dengan bersyarat. Sama ada saya akan mempertimbangkannya dalam penentuan muktamad saya akan menjadi fungsi hujah yang saya benarkan anda tempah dan buat.


Premise: The World Bank I think is generally doing a better job, but I think one of the big issues here that doesn't get nearly enough attention is the issue of corruption. The governor mentioned it earlier. I've worked on this issue. It's an enormous problem and corruption in official agencies, like militaries and police departments around the world, customs officials, that's one of the worst forms of it.

Hypothesis: The governor worked with customs officials to foster corruption.

The statement is in the correct category because the excerpt states that the governor spoke out about corruption, so it doesn't make any sense that they would help to create it. The system may have had difficulty because the excerpt mentions the governor talking about corruption.

Bank Dunia yang saya fikir secara amnya melakukan kerja yang lebih baik, tetapi saya fikir salah satu isu besar di sini yang tidak mendapat perhatian yang cukup ialah isu rasuah. Gabenor menyebutnya tadi. Saya telah mengusahakan isu ini. Ia adalah masalah besar dan rasuah dalam agensi rasmi, seperti tentera dan jabatan polis di seluruh dunia, pegawai kastam, itu adalah salah satu bentuk yang paling teruk.

Gabenor bekerja dengan pegawai kastam untuk memupuk rasuah.


Premise: I think we ought to raise the age at which a juvenile can carry a handgun from 18 to 21. I disagree with the vice president on this issue. He is for registration of guns. I think the only people that are going to show up to register or get a license -- I guess licensing like a driver's license for a gun, the only people that are going to show up are law-abiding citizens.

Hypothesis: Juveniles can carry handguns at 16.

Beat the system with simplicity and using a *similar number* to the one used in the article.

Saya fikir kita patut meningkatkan umur di mana seorang remaja boleh membawa pistol daripada 18 kepada 21. Saya tidak bersetuju dengan naib presiden dalam isu ini. Dia adalah untuk pendaftaran senjata api. Saya rasa satu-satunya orang yang akan hadir untuk mendaftar atau mendapatkan lesen -- Saya rasa pelesenan seperti lesen memandu untuk pistol, satu-satunya orang yang akan muncul adalah warganegara yang mematuhi undang-undang.

Juvana boleh membawa pistol pada usia 16 tahun.


Premise: But take Russia, for example. We went into Russia, we said here is some IMF money, and it ended up in Viktor Chemomyrdin's pocket, and others, and yet we played like there was reform. The only people that are going to reform Russia are Russia. They're going to have to make the decision themselves.

Hypothesis: victor chemomyrdin is president of russia

victor chemomyrdin  was primeminister of russia not president - so this is definitely incorrect

Tetapi ambil Rusia, sebagai contoh. Kami pergi ke Rusia, kami berkata di sini adalah wang IMF, dan ia berakhir dalam poket Viktor Chemomyrdin, dan lain-lain, namun kami bermain seperti ada pembaharuan. Satu-satunya orang yang akan memperbaharui Rusia ialah Rusia. Mereka perlu membuat keputusan sendiri.

viktor chernomyrdin ialah presiden rusia


Premise: But we have several issues. One is that when we filed our motion to quash last week, quite honestly, we thought we did it in a timely fashion because we filed it only after we were served with the subpoena. Your Honor summarily dismissed that motion to quash, so, in effect, if my reporters were to be called upon to testify today by the plaintiffs, they're undressed.

Hypothesis: We were served with a subpoena after we filed the motion to quash.

The statement is incorrect because the motion to quash was filed after the subpoena was served. The system might have been fooled because of the way I wrote the statement (rearranging the order of the original sentence and introducing the change in timing).

Tetapi kita mempunyai beberapa isu. Salah satunya ialah apabila kami memfailkan usul untuk membatalkan minggu lepas, secara jujur, kami fikir kami melakukannya tepat pada masanya kerana kami memfailkannya hanya selepas kami disampaikan dengan sepina. Yang Berhormat dengan ringkasnya menolak usul untuk membatalkan itu, jadi, sebenarnya, jika wartawan saya dipanggil untuk memberi keterangan hari ini oleh plaintif, mereka tidak berpakaian.

Kami diberi sapina selepas kami memfailkan usul untuk membatalkan.


Premise: But you can't say when you walk into a classroom, you're not teaching. And if that's what's happening in the Dover school system and my children are in that school system, that they're routinely establishing practices that is not teaching in the classroom, then that's shameful.

Hypothesis: Anyone who walks into a classroom is teaching

Tetapi anda tidak boleh mengatakan apabila anda masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, anda tidak mengajar. Dan jika itu yang berlaku dalam sistem sekolah Dover dan anak-anak saya berada dalam sistem sekolah itu, bahawa mereka secara rutin mewujudkan amalan yang tidak mengajar di dalam bilik darjah, maka itu memalukan.

Sesiapa yang masuk ke dalam bilik darjah sedang mengajar


Premise: Mrs. Smith, I'm going to hand you what purports to be your deposition that was taken by Patrick Gillen. I would like you to direct your attention to Page 13, and I would like you to read out loud the question that you are asked starting with Line 18 and all the way down through that page and then going on to the next page, Page 14, and reading from Line 1 through Line 4. And please read it out loud.

Hypothesis: Mrs. Smith read aloud all of the contents of Page 13.

Mrs. Smith was instructed to start at Line 18 of the page, indicative that there was preceding text that was omitted from her reading.

Puan Smith, saya akan menyerahkan kepada anda apa yang dikatakan sebagai pemendapan anda yang telah diambil oleh Patrick Gillen. Saya ingin anda menumpukan perhatian anda kepada Halaman 13, dan saya ingin anda membaca dengan kuat soalan yang anda ditanya bermula dengan Baris 18 dan sehingga ke bawah halaman itu dan kemudian pergi ke halaman seterusnya, Halaman 14 , dan membaca dari Baris 1 hingga Baris 4. Dan sila baca dengan kuat.

Puan Smith membaca dengan kuat semua kandungan Halaman 13.


Premise: Well, I don't know about all these percentages that he throws out, but I do know that -- I speculate that the reason why he didn't answer your question directly as to whether my numbers were right, the facts were right about Texas ranking dead last in families with health insurance and 49th out of 50 for both children and women, is because those facts are correct.

Hypothesis: health insurance has a xxx

Nah, saya tidak tahu tentang semua peratusan yang dia buang ini, tetapi saya tahu itu -- saya membuat spekulasi bahawa sebab mengapa dia tidak menjawab soalan anda secara langsung sama ada nombor saya betul, faktanya betul tentang Kedudukan Texas yang terakhir mati dalam keluarga dengan insurans kesihatan dan ke-49 daripada 50 untuk kanak-kanak dan wanita, adalah kerana fakta tersebut adalah betul.


Premise: And I don't think that's just the kind of exaggeration that we take pride in as Americans. It's really true, even the ones that sometimes shake their fists at us. As soon as they have a change that allows the people to speak freely, they're wanting to develop some kind of blueprint that will help them be like us more, freedom, free markets, political freedom.

Hypothesis: People in other countries do not want to be like us and speak freely.

It says as soon as people are allowed to speak freely, the people develop  blueprints to be like us.

Dan saya tidak fikir itu hanya jenis keterlaluan yang kita banggakan sebagai rakyat Amerika. Memang benar, malah yang kadang-kadang berjabat penumbuk kepada kita. Sebaik sahaja mereka mempunyai perubahan yang membolehkan orang ramai bersuara dengan bebas, mereka mahu membangunkan beberapa jenis pelan tindakan yang akan membantu mereka menjadi lebih seperti kita, kebebasan, pasaran bebas, kebebasan politik.

Orang di negara lain tidak mahu menjadi seperti kita dan bebas bercakap.


Premise: Justice Ginsburg, we have no quarrel with the objective of harmonization fitting within the "promote the progress of science" understanding subject to constitutional limitations. If France adopted a rule that said you couldn't grant copyrights to hate speech, we could not harmonize with that rule consistent with our First Amendment and similarly, as Mary Beth Peters testified before Congress, ours is the only Constitution that has an express limitation on terms.

Hypothesis: France has adopted a rule that does not allow the copyright of hate speech

The statement says IF FRANCE has adopted a rule that couldnt copyright hate speech

Hakim Ginsburg, kami tidak mempunyai pertengkaran dengan objektif penyelarasan yang sesuai dalam pemahaman "menggalakkan kemajuan sains" tertakluk kepada batasan perlembagaan. Jika Perancis menerima pakai peraturan yang mengatakan anda tidak boleh memberikan hak cipta kepada ucapan benci, kami tidak boleh menyelaraskan dengan peraturan itu selaras dengan Pindaan Pertama kami dan begitu juga, seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Mary Beth Peters di hadapan Kongres, Perlembagaan kami adalah satu-satunya Perlembagaan yang mempunyai had nyata dengan syarat.

Perancis telah menerima pakai peraturan yang tidak membenarkan hak cipta ucapan benci


Premise: Because time does not permit I do not want to go into an in depth analysis and talk about how, when the Liberal government took office in 1993, the unemployment rate was at 11.5 percent and today as we all know it is 9 percent and dropping; how we inherited a $42 billion deficit from a Conservative government that had never met its budget targets; or how we inherited a country so weakened from all aspects that we were being described as a third world economy.

Hypothesis: The unemployment rate in 1993 was higher than (11+1)%.

It's definitely incorrect because it was at 11.5%, which is lower than 12%. It's difficult because the system thinks I'm saying that the rate was higher than 11%, not 12%.

Kerana masa tidak mengizinkan saya tidak mahu pergi ke analisis yang mendalam dan bercakap tentang bagaimana, apabila kerajaan Liberal memegang jawatan pada tahun 1993, kadar pengangguran adalah pada 11.5 peratus dan hari ini seperti yang kita semua tahu ia adalah 9 peratus dan menurun; bagaimana kita mewarisi defisit $42 bilion daripada kerajaan Konservatif yang tidak pernah mencapai sasaran belanjawannya; atau bagaimana kita mewarisi negara yang begitu lemah dari semua aspek sehingga kita digambarkan sebagai ekonomi dunia ketiga.

Kadar pengangguran pada tahun 1993 adalah lebih tinggi daripada (11+1)%.


Premise: The -- as we described in our brief, in pages 34 through 36, I believe it is in our brief, that the concerns about the limitation on exploitation and the limitation of a copyright period in Europe is based upon the country of origin of the work and the shortest time available.

Hypothesis: Pages 34 to 36 describe that the limitation on exploitation and limitation of a copyright period in Europe is based upon the sales that occur in the country of origin of the work.

The summary indicated that the limitation is based on the country of origin of the writing not the sales.

-- seperti yang kami terangkan dalam ringkasan kami, di halaman 34 hingga 36, saya percaya dalam ringkasan kami, kebimbangan mengenai pengehadan eksploitasi dan pengehadan tempoh hak cipta di Eropah adalah berdasarkan negara asal kerja dan masa terpendek yang ada.

Halaman 34 hingga 36 menerangkan bahawa pengehadan terhadap eksploitasi dan pengehadan tempoh hak cipta di Eropah adalah berdasarkan jualan yang berlaku di negara asal karya.


Premise: (2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and, shall within five yeas after the review is undertaken, submit a report to the House of Commons.''

Hypothesis: The committee will act after 5 years.

It says the committee shall act within five years.

(2) Jawatankuasa yang ditetapkan atau ditubuhkan bagi maksud subseksyen (1) hendaklah, dengan seberapa segera yang dapat dilaksanakan, menjalankan kajian semula menyeluruh mengenai peruntukan dan kuat kuasa Akta ini dan, hendaklah dalam tempoh lima tahun selepas kajian semula itu dijalankan, mengemukakan laporan. kepada Dewan Rakyat.''

Jawatankuasa akan bertindak selepas 5 tahun.


Premise: This country was founded on Christianity, and our students should be taught as such.' This statement is in direct contradiction to the mission statement of the Dover schools. "In partnership with family and community to educate students, we emphasize sound, basic skills and nurture the diverse needs of our students as they strive to become lifelong learners and contributing members of our global society.

Hypothesis: Parents desiring an education for their children based on Christian principles should send their children to Dover schools.

Negara ini diasaskan atas agama Kristian, dan pelajar kita harus diajar seperti itu.' Kenyataan ini bercanggah langsung dengan pernyataan misi sekolah Dover. "Dengan kerjasama keluarga dan komuniti untuk mendidik pelajar, kami menekankan kemahiran asas yang kukuh dan memupuk pelbagai keperluan pelajar kami sambil mereka berusaha untuk menjadi pelajar sepanjang hayat dan menyumbang ahli masyarakat global kami.

Ibu bapa yang inginkan pendidikan untuk anak-anak mereka berdasarkan prinsip Kristian harus menghantar anak-anak mereka ke sekolah Dover.


Premise: Your Honor, just one other clarification question. With regard to asking what they saw and heard with regard to all of the statements and the articles, I would assume that's statements made after the gavel banged and the meeting was over. Some of those quotes are afterwards.

Hypothesis: Judges are very rarely referred to as "Your Honor."

Judges are almost always referred to as "Your Honor." Since this was the only instance the judge was addressed directly I would think that the system would brand it incorrect.

Yang Berhormat, hanya satu lagi soalan penjelasan. Berkenaan dengan bertanya apa yang mereka lihat dan dengar berkenaan dengan semua kenyataan dan artikel, saya akan menganggap itu kenyataan yang dibuat selepas palu dipukul dan mesyuarat selesai. Beberapa petikan itu selepas itu.

Hakim sangat jarang dirujuk sebagai "Yang Berhormat."


Premise: In the PC plan for growth we call for government to allow Canadians to have more flexibility with their RESP contributions and transfers from their RRSPs, but only as part of a holistic policy toward economic growth, one that combines tax relief, lower income taxes, lower payroll taxes, greater opportunities for jobs and growth in Canada that would keep young people here where they belong.

Hypothesis: In the PC plan for growth we call for government to allow Canadians to have more flexibility with their RESR contributions

It is RESP contributions, not RESR! I think the model got confused because the words are so similar.

Dalam rancangan PC untuk pertumbuhan, kami menyeru kerajaan membenarkan rakyat Kanada mempunyai lebih fleksibiliti dengan sumbangan RESP dan pemindahan mereka daripada RRSP mereka, tetapi hanya sebagai sebahagian daripada dasar holistik ke arah pertumbuhan ekonomi, yang menggabungkan pelepasan cukai, cukai pendapatan yang lebih rendah, lebih rendah. cukai gaji, peluang yang lebih besar untuk pekerjaan dan pertumbuhan di Kanada yang akan mengekalkan golongan muda di sini di mana mereka berada.

Dalam rancangan PC untuk pertumbuhan, kami menyeru kerajaan untuk membenarkan orang Kanada mempunyai lebih fleksibiliti dengan sumbangan RESR mereka


Premise: Well, let's stay on the subject for a moment. New question related to this. I figured this out; in the last 20 years there have been eight major actions that involved the introduction of U.S. ground, air or naval forces. Let me name them. Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. If you had been president for any of those interventions, would any of those interventions not have happened?

Hypothesis: There has been an odd number of major actions involving the introduction of U.S. air grounds or naval forces, in the 20 most recent years.

The Agent claimed there were eight major actions that involved the introduction of the U.S. air grounds or naval forces. Eight is an even number, and therefore it could not be an odd number

Baiklah, mari kita kekal pada subjek itu seketika. Soalan baru yang berkaitan dengan ini. Saya fikir ini; dalam 20 tahun kebelakangan ini terdapat lapan tindakan utama yang melibatkan pengenalan tentera darat, udara atau tentera laut A.S. Biar saya namakan mereka. Lubnan, Grenada, Panama, Teluk Parsi, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. Jika anda pernah menjadi presiden untuk mana-mana campur tangan tersebut, adakah mana-mana campur tangan itu tidak akan berlaku?

Terdapat beberapa tindakan besar yang ganjil yang melibatkan pengenalan pangkalan udara atau tentera laut A.S., dalam 20 tahun terkini.


Premise: That, in the present sitting, proceedings pursuant to Standing Order 38 shall be taken up immediately following the completion of Private Members' Business and, when such proceedings are completed, the House shall proceed immediately to proceedings pursuant to Standing Order 52, provided that during the aforementioned proceedings the Chair shall not receive any quorum calls or dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent.

Hypothesis: After standing order 38 is completed, they will immediately proceed with a standing order that is an odd number.

They will proceed with standing order 52, which is an even number.  The system was likely confused and didn't know the difference between odd and even.

Bahawa, dalam persidangan ini, prosiding menurut Peraturan Tetap 38 hendaklah diambil dengan serta-merta selepas selesainya Urusan Persendirian dan, apabila prosiding itu selesai, Dewan hendaklah meneruskan prosiding dengan serta-merta menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat 52, dengan syarat bahawa semasa prosiding yang disebutkan di atas Pengerusi tidak akan menerima sebarang panggilan korum atau usul dilatory atau permintaan untuk persetujuan sebulat suara.

Selepas perintah tetap 38 selesai, mereka akan segera meneruskan perintah tetap yang merupakan nombor ganjil.


Premise: On face value, based upon the debate thus far, we have on the record of this house an observation that perhaps the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada has said that Madam Justice Arbour has adopted a certain position or a view with reference to this legislation.

Hypothesis: four people are mentioned in the passage

only three people/positions are mentioned in the passage

Pada nilai muka, berdasarkan perbahasan setakat ini, kami mempunyai dalam rekod dewan ini pemerhatian bahawa mungkin Menteri Kehakiman dan Peguam Negara Kanada telah mengatakan bahawa Puan Justice Arbor telah menerima pakai pendirian atau pandangan tertentu dengan merujuk kepada perundangan ini.


Premise: But it's important to have credibility and credibility is formed by being strong with your friends and resoluting your determination. One of the reasons why I think it's important for this nation to develop an anti-ballistic missile system that we can share with our allies in the Middle East if need be to keep the peace is to be able to say to the Saddam Husseins of the world or the Iranians, don't dare threaten our friends.

Hypothesis: an anti-ballistic missile system is a good idea to share with Iran.

I ran is not our ally so it would not be a good idea to share these weapons with them therefore it is incorrect.

Tetapi adalah penting untuk mempunyai kredibiliti dan kredibiliti dibentuk dengan menjadi kuat dengan rakan anda dan menetapkan keazaman anda. Salah satu sebab mengapa saya fikir adalah penting bagi negara ini untuk membangunkan sistem peluru berpandu anti-balistik yang boleh kita kongsi dengan sekutu kita di Timur Tengah jika perlu untuk menjaga keamanan adalah untuk dapat berkata kepada Saddam Hussein dunia atau orang Iran, jangan berani mengancam kawan kita.

sistem peluru berpandu anti-balistik adalah idea yang baik untuk dikongsi dengan Iran.


Premise: Recently Quebec agricultural producers, processors, and distributors, as well as the UPA and MAPAQ, came up with an initial proposal: with the OECD showing more flexibility, the United States taking a tougher stance, and little give from Asia, Japan and Europe, the UPA is calling for the status quo.

Hypothesis: This passage concerns the producers, processors, and distributors and consumers of agricultural products

Baru-baru ini pengeluar, pemproses dan pengedar pertanian Quebec, serta UPA dan MAPAQ, telah mengemukakan cadangan awal: dengan OECD menunjukkan lebih fleksibiliti, Amerika Syarikat mengambil sikap yang lebih tegas, dan sedikit pemberian daripada Asia, Jepun dan Eropah, UPA menyeru kepada status quo.

Petikan ini melibatkan pengeluar, pemproses, dan pengedar serta pengguna produk pertanian


Premise: The Auditor General, in his 1997 report, confirmed the importance of habitat restoration; yet this winter the federal government cancelled a mapping and inventory program developed on the coast to standardize essential salmon habitat mapping and inventory services and put displaced fishermen back to work.

Hypothesis: Displaced fisherman were put back to work, due to the confirmed importance of habitat restoration.

It appears that phrases with words in the correct sequence fooled they system, since my statement is the exact opposite of what the text says.

Ketua Audit Negara, dalam laporannya pada 1997, mengesahkan kepentingan pemulihan habitat; namun pada musim sejuk ini kerajaan persekutuan membatalkan program pemetaan dan inventori yang dibangunkan di pantai untuk menyeragamkan perkhidmatan pemetaan habitat dan inventori salmon penting dan meletakkan nelayan yang terlantar kembali bekerja.

Nelayan yang dipindahkan telah dimasukkan semula ke tempat kerja, kerana kepentingan pemulihan habitat yang disahkan.


Premise: Started off as a humanitarian mission and it changed into a nation-building mission, and that's where the mission went wrong. The mission was changed. And as a result, our nation paid a price. And so I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building. I think our troops ought to be used to fight and win war. I think our troops ought to be used to help overthrow the dictator when it's in our best interests. But in this case it was a nation-building exercise, and same with Haiti. I wouldn't have supported either.

Hypothesis: The nation-building here refers to Haiti.

No, the speaker is speaking about a different country and then references Haiti also.

Bermula sebagai misi kemanusiaan dan ia berubah menjadi misi pembinaan negara, dan di situlah salahnya misi. Misi telah diubah. Dan akibatnya, negara kita membayar harga. Jadi saya rasa tentera kita tidak sepatutnya digunakan untuk apa yang dipanggil pembinaan negara. Saya fikir tentera kita sepatutnya digunakan untuk berperang dan memenangi peperangan. Saya rasa tentera kita patut digunakan untuk membantu menggulingkan diktator apabila ia demi kepentingan kita. Tetapi dalam kes ini ia adalah latihan pembinaan negara, dan sama dengan Haiti. Saya juga tidak akan menyokong.

Pembinaan negara di sini merujuk kepada Haiti.


Premise: Well, I think that it could very well be yes, for the reason that in the 1790 statute the Congress specifically was aware of -- that there were State copyright laws which didn't last as long as the Federal statute. Several of the States hadn't finished enacting those copyright laws, and a couple of States hadn't enacted them at all.

Hypothesis: The statute was in the early 1700's

The statute was 1790 which is the late 1700's.

Baiklah, saya fikir ia boleh jadi ya, atas sebab dalam statut 1790 Kongres secara khusus mengetahui -- bahawa terdapat undang-undang hak cipta Negeri yang tidak kekal selagi statut Persekutuan. Beberapa Negeri belum selesai menggubal undang-undang hak cipta tersebut, dan beberapa Negeri tidak menggubalnya sama sekali.


Premise: Here's what I do: We take over Medicaid children from the states so that every child in America is covered. And in exchange, if the states want to -- they're not forced to, they can choose to -- they cover individuals up to 300 percent of poverty. It's their choice.

Hypothesis: If the states do not contribute, then the children cannot be covered

the text states that the children will be covered whether or not the state provides funding.

Inilah yang saya lakukan: Kami mengambil alih kanak-kanak Medicaid dari negeri supaya setiap kanak-kanak di Amerika dilindungi. Dan sebagai pertukaran, jika negeri-negeri mahu -- mereka tidak dipaksa, mereka boleh memilih untuk -- mereka melindungi individu sehingga 300 peratus daripada kemiskinan. Itu pilihan mereka.

Jika negeri tidak menyumbang, maka anak-anak tidak boleh dilindungi


Premise: That we spent -- the top 1% receive 223 as opposed to 445 billion in new spending. The top -- let's talk about my tax plan. The top 1% will pay one-third of all the federal income taxes. And in return, get one-fifth of the benefits, because most of the tax reductions go to the people at the bottom end of the economic ladder.

Hypothesis: The top 1% will pay one-third of all the state income taxes.

The original passage states that "the top 1% will pay one-third of all the federal income taxes" not state taxes.

Bahawa kami membelanjakan - 1% teratas menerima 223 berbanding 445 bilion perbelanjaan baru. Bahagian atas - mari kita bercakap mengenai pelan cukai saya. 1% teratas akan membayar satu pertiga daripada semua cukai pendapatan persekutuan. Dan sebagai balasan, dapatkan seperlima manfaat, kerana kebanyakan pengurangan cukai pergi ke rakyat di hujung bawah tangga ekonomi.

1% teratas akan membayar satu pertiga daripada semua cukai pendapatan negeri.


Premise: The budgetary measures include tax relief for interest on all student loans, interest relief for more graduates, extended repayment periods for those who need them, extended interest relief periods for those who remain in financial difficulty and reductions in loan principal for those who still face financial difficulty.

Hypothesis: The budgetary measures include decreased taxes for the rich.

The text does not mention anything about tax reduction for the rich.

Langkah belanjawan termasuk pelepasan cukai untuk faedah ke atas semua pinjaman pelajar, pelepasan faedah untuk lebih ramai graduan, lanjutan tempoh pembayaran balik bagi mereka yang memerlukannya, lanjutan tempoh pelepasan faedah bagi mereka yang mengalami masalah kewangan dan pengurangan prinsipal pinjaman bagi mereka yang masih menghadapi masalah kewangan. kesukaran.

Langkah belanjawan termasuk penurunan cukai untuk orang kaya.


Premise: Yes, but all of the history of the development of these clauses suggests that -- and this Court has indicated in its decisions with respect to copyright, that the Framers were concerned and the Congress is legitimately concerned not just in providing the spark of creativity, but to make sure that that's distributed widely and available, and there may be many reasons why -- we're -- we --

Hypothesis: The Framers are members of the Court.

The text says the Court has indicated in its decisions with respect to copyright, that the Framers were concerned and the Congress is legitimately concerned... This suggests they are different groups of people.The model did not make this conclusion.

Ya, tetapi semua sejarah perkembangan fasal ini menunjukkan bahawa -- dan Mahkamah ini telah menyatakan dalam keputusannya berkenaan dengan hak cipta, bahawa Penggubal prihatin dan Kongres secara sah mengambil berat bukan hanya dalam menyediakan cetusan kreativiti, tetapi untuk memastikan bahawa ia diedarkan secara meluas dan tersedia, dan mungkin terdapat banyak sebab mengapa -- kami -- kami --


Premise: Madam Speaker, I would like to start by congratulating the hon. member for Rosemont for this initiative and for the role he has played in encouraging the federal government and the Minister of Health to take steps to allow the legal use of marijuana for health and medical purposes.

Hypothesis: Madam Speaker is a male.

Madam Speaker infers this is a female. Therefore, male is incorrect. Not sure why this fooled the system.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya mulakan dengan mengucapkan tahniah kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Rosemont untuk inisiatif ini dan untuk peranan yang telah dimainkannya dalam menggalakkan kerajaan persekutuan dan Menteri Kesihatan mengambil langkah untuk membenarkan penggunaan ganja secara sah untuk tujuan kesihatan dan perubatan.


Premise: From March 4, 1993, when the damage control operation began, through the orchestrated in-house investigation, through the conceiving, conspiring, conniving and sanctioning of lies and misinformation, through the tampering with documents and the destruction of evidence, to the successful campaign to shut down the Somalia inquiry, people in high places for whom we are ultimately responsible have evaded accountability, escaped responsibility and eluded the efforts of properly constituted civilian authority - Parliament, government, a Royal Commission - to establish the truth.

Hypothesis: nobody wanted to know the truth

No effort to establish the truth was made.

Mulai 4 Mac 1993, apabila operasi kawalan kerosakan bermula, melalui penyiasatan dalaman yang dirancang, melalui penyiasatan, konspirasi, berkomplot dan membenarkan pembohongan dan maklumat salah, melalui pengubahan dokumen dan pemusnahan bukti, kepada kempen yang berjaya. untuk menutup siasatan Somalia, orang di tempat tinggi yang kita bertanggungjawab akhirnya telah mengelak akauntabiliti, melepaskan tanggungjawab dan mengelak daripada usaha pihak berkuasa awam yang dibentuk dengan betul - Parlimen, kerajaan, Suruhanjaya Diraja - untuk menegakkan kebenaran.

tiada siapa yang mahu mengetahui kebenaran


Premise: And I recall the meeting starting with Bill Buckingham sort of -- I'm sorry, Trudy Peterman spoke about her -- actually, hold on. Give me one second to think about this. Yes, Trudy Peterman spoke. She was the high school principal at the time. And I know that she spoke because the thing that she said seemed very similar to her graduation speech that she had said just previously.

Hypothesis: Trudy Peterman spoke about him and her.

The statement claims that Trudy Peterman spoke about "her" not "him", so it can't be both.

Dan saya masih ingat pertemuan itu bermula dengan Bill Buckingham semacam -- Saya minta maaf, Trudy Peterman bercakap tentang dia -- sebenarnya, tunggu. Beri saya satu saat untuk memikirkan perkara ini. Ya, Trudy Peterman bercakap. Dia adalah pengetua sekolah menengah pada masa itu. Dan saya tahu bahawa dia bercakap kerana perkara yang dia katakan kelihatan sangat serupa dengan ucapan tamat pengajiannya yang dia katakan sebelum ini.

Trudy Peterman bercakap tentang dia dan dia.


Premise: So how do I make it better? Well, we provided an affidavit, and that affidavit indicated that we, if called upon to testify, would validate the authenticity of the articles that were written. We did that, in effect, to offer to both sides so that we wouldn't otherwise have to testify. Accepted by the plaintiffs, not accepted by the defendants. Defendants wanted to have the right of cross-examination.

Hypothesis: Defendants has three e's.

Jadi bagaimana saya boleh menjadikannya lebih baik? Nah, kami menyediakan afidavit, dan afidavit itu menunjukkan bahawa kami, jika dipanggil untuk memberi keterangan, akan mengesahkan kesahihan artikel yang ditulis. Kami melakukan itu, sebenarnya, untuk menawarkan kepada kedua-dua pihak supaya kami tidak perlu memberi keterangan. Diterima oleh plaintif, tidak diterima oleh defendan. Defendan mahu mempunyai hak pemeriksaan balas.


Premise: In The Toronto Star, the story is that, before the offending letter was sent off to Swiss authorities, it went back and forth several times between Staff Sergeant Fiegenwald and the Justice Department lawyer Kimberly Prost, each time resulting in the Justice Department toughening the language.

Hypothesis: "it" refers to the story

Dalam The Toronto Star, ceritanya ialah, sebelum surat yang menyinggung perasaan dihantar kepada pihak berkuasa Switzerland, ia berulang-alik beberapa kali antara Staf Sarjan Fiegenwald dan peguam Jabatan Kehakiman Kimberly Prost, setiap kali menyebabkan Jabatan Kehakiman memperkukuh bahasa. .


Premise: Nevertheless, these petitioners, who were opposed to the MAI, call upon parliament to recognize the fact that Canadians reject the MAI approach to globalization and they instruct the government to seek an entirely different kind of agreement by which the world might achieve a rules based global economy which protects workers, the environment and the ability of governments to act in the public interest.

Hypothesis: Nevertheless, these petitioners, who were opposed to the MAI, call upon parliament to recognize the fact that Americans reject the MAI approach to globalization

Canadians reject it, not the americans. I'm not sure why the model got confused by that.

Walau bagaimanapun, pempetisyen ini, yang menentang MAI, menyeru parlimen untuk mengiktiraf hakikat bahawa orang Kanada menolak pendekatan MAI terhadap globalisasi dan mereka mengarahkan kerajaan untuk mendapatkan jenis perjanjian yang sama sekali berbeza di mana dunia mungkin mencapai peraturan berasaskan global. ekonomi yang melindungi pekerja, alam sekitar dan keupayaan kerajaan untuk bertindak demi kepentingan awam.

Namun begitu, pempetisyen ini, yang menentang MAI, menyeru parlimen untuk mengiktiraf hakikat bahawa rakyat Amerika menolak pendekatan MAI terhadap globalisasi


Premise: First of all, I understand and deeply respect the position that you're in in this case. And by saying that the motion was untimely, it was not legally untimely, it was untimely in my view only in the sense that it came, as I said, on the eve of trial, when we knew that there was going to be an issue with respect to their testimony at trial. It was an attempt to bring this to a head. It was successful in that respect. It was not successful in solving the problem, but it was successful to bringing it to a head. So to that extent, I succeeded, good, bad, or indifferent.

Hypothesis: the person speaking is rude

Pertama sekali, saya faham dan amat menghormati kedudukan anda dalam kes ini. Dan dengan mengatakan bahawa usul itu tidak tepat pada masanya, ia tidak tepat pada masanya di sisi undang-undang, ia adalah tidak tepat pada masanya pada pandangan saya hanya dalam erti kata ia datang, seperti yang saya katakan, pada malam sebelum perbicaraan, apabila kita tahu bahawa akan ada isu. berkenaan dengan keterangan mereka di perbicaraan. Ia adalah satu percubaan untuk membawa perkara ini ke kepala. Ia berjaya dalam hal itu. Ia tidak berjaya menyelesaikan masalah, tetapi ia berjaya membawanya ke kepala. Jadi setakat itu, saya berjaya, baik, buruk, atau acuh tak acuh.


Premise: That the subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the week of April 19, 1999, to Kingston and Toronto during the week of May 10, 1999 and to Montreal and region during the week of May 24, 1999 and that the necessary staff accompany it.

Hypothesis: The subcommittee will take 4 trips in the spring of 1999

They will take 3: April 19, 199, May 10, 1999, and May 24, 1999.

Bahawa jawatankuasa kecil Akta Pembetulan dan Pelepasan Bersyarat diberikan kuasa untuk pergi ke Edmonton, Regina dan Winnipeg pada minggu 19 April 1999, ke Kingston dan Toronto pada minggu 10 Mei 1999 dan ke Montreal dan wilayah pada minggu 24 Mei 1999 dan kakitangan yang diperlukan mengiringinya.

Jawatankuasa kecil akan mengambil 4 perjalanan pada musim bunga 1999


Premise: This president has turned his back on the wellness of America. And there is no system. In fact, it's starting to fall apart not because of lawsuits -- though they are a problem, and John Edwards and I are committed to fixing them -- but because of the larger issue that we don't cover Americans.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes the president has the back of the wellness of America.

To "have the back of" something is the opposite meaning of "turning one's back on" something, so this statement is incorrect.

Presiden ini telah membelakangkan kesejahteraan Amerika. Dan tidak ada sistem. Malah, ia mula runtuh bukan kerana tindakan undang-undang -- walaupun ia adalah masalah, dan John Edwards dan saya komited untuk membetulkannya -- tetapi kerana isu yang lebih besar yang kami tidak meliputi orang Amerika.

Penceramah percaya presiden menyokong kesihatan Amerika.


Premise: If I think it's in our nation's strategic interest I'll commit troops. I thought it was in our strategic interests to keep Milosevic in check because of our relations in NATO, and that's why I took the position I took. I think it's important for NATO to be strong and confident. I felt like unchecked Milosevic would harm NATO, and so it depends on the situation, Mr. Vice President.

Hypothesis: Milosevic wants good things for Nato

Jika saya fikir ia adalah untuk kepentingan strategik negara kita, saya akan meletakkan tentera. Saya fikir ia adalah kepentingan strategik kami untuk memastikan Milosevic terkawal kerana hubungan kami dalam NATO, dan itulah sebabnya saya mengambil kedudukan yang saya ambil. Saya fikir penting untuk NATO menjadi kuat dan yakin. Saya rasa Milosevic yang tidak dikawal akan membahayakan NATO, jadi ia bergantung kepada keadaan, Encik Naib Presiden.

Milosevic mahukan perkara yang baik untuk NATO


Premise: I don't find it beyond the scope of direct. It's appropriate cross-examination. It's overruled on that basis. We're getting argumentative only because I think the witness and counsel are talking over each other. Each of you let the other finish before you start talking.

Hypothesis: The statement was not given by a judge.

This is exactly what a judge would say in a courtroom proceeding, referring to witness and counsel, it cannot be anyone else.

Saya tidak mendapati ia di luar skop langsung. Ia adalah pemeriksaan balas yang sesuai. Ia ditolak atas dasar itu. Kami semakin berbalah hanya kerana saya fikir saksi dan peguam bercakap antara satu sama lain. Setiap daripada anda membiarkan yang lain selesai sebelum anda mula bercakap.

Kenyataan itu tidak diberikan oleh hakim.


Premise: Yes. Bill Buckingham said to her -- and I know Bill Buckingham because at the time he lived down the street from my grandparents and for many years lived there. And he responded to her basically saying that there's, you know, a problem with the textbook, it needs to be balanced, comments about laced with Darwinism, it needed to be balanced with creationism. Comments of that nature is what he had said to her.

Hypothesis: At the time, Bill Buckingham lived down the street from the speaker's parents.

It's definitely incorrect because he lived down the street from the speaker's grandparents, not the speaker's parents. It's difficult because the words are similar enough to confuse the syste,.

ya. Bill Buckingham berkata kepadanya -- dan saya mengenali Bill Buckingham kerana pada masa itu dia tinggal di tepi jalan dari datuk dan nenek saya dan selama bertahun-tahun tinggal di sana. Dan dia menjawabnya pada dasarnya mengatakan bahawa terdapat, anda tahu, masalah dengan buku teks, ia perlu seimbang, komen tentang dicampur dengan Darwinisme, ia perlu diseimbangkan dengan penciptaan. Komen seperti itu adalah apa yang dia katakan kepadanya.

Pada masa itu, Bill Buckingham tinggal di sebelah ibu bapa penceramah.


Premise: Why does it exist in Bill C-20? The proposal in Bill C-20 will amend section 183 of the Criminal Code to allow wiretapping without consent of private communications in connection with investigations under the conspiracy, bid rigging and deceptive telemarketing offences of the act.

Hypothesis: Section C-20 of the criminal code allows wiretapping without consent

It's definitely incorrect because it is section 183 that allows wiretapping, not C-20. C-20 is the Bill name.

Mengapakah ia wujud dalam Rang Undang-Undang C-20? Cadangan dalam Rang Undang-Undang C-20 akan meminda seksyen 183 Kanun Jenayah untuk membenarkan penyadapan tanpa persetujuan komunikasi persendirian berkaitan dengan penyiasatan di bawah konspirasi, penipuan bidaan dan kesalahan telemarketing memperdayakan akta itu.

Seksyen C-20 kanun jenayah membenarkan penyadapan tanpa kebenaran


Premise: Expanding offences for which a youth is presumed to receive an adult sentence to include a pattern of convictions for serious violent offences and extending the group of offenders who are expected to receive an adult sentence to include 14 and 15 year olds will be welcomed by most Canadians.

Hypothesis: A minority of Canadians will welcome the sentencing changes.

Since the context says most Canadians will welcome the sentencing changes, that means a majority, not a minority of them will welcome them. Perhaps the AI was fooled because of me throwing in the word "minority" that it would have had to define and relate to my statement.

Memperluas kesalahan yang mana seorang belia dianggap menerima hukuman dewasa untuk memasukkan corak sabitan bagi kesalahan kekerasan yang serius dan melanjutkan kumpulan pesalah yang dijangka menerima hukuman dewasa untuk memasukkan kanak-kanak berumur 14 dan 15 tahun akan dialu-alukan oleh kebanyakan orang Kanada .

Sebilangan kecil warga Kanada akan mengalu-alukan perubahan hukuman.


Premise: I am sure if he had longer to ask his question he would have pointed out the fact that the former Progressive Conservative government was busy making important structural changes and if it would have had just a little more time it would have probably pursued the necessary fundamental changes we are discussing as the Progressive Conservative Party of 1999.

Hypothesis: The statement is more than one sentence

there is actually only just one sentence in the statement! I think the model got confused because the statement is pretty long but that's how the narrator wrote the statement.

Saya pasti jika dia mempunyai masa yang lebih lama untuk bertanya soalannya, dia akan menunjukkan fakta bahawa bekas kerajaan Konservatif Progresif sedang sibuk membuat perubahan struktur yang penting dan jika ia hanya mempunyai sedikit masa lagi ia mungkin akan meneruskan perubahan asas yang diperlukan kita berbincang sebagai Parti Konservatif Progresif 1999.


Premise: (b) are comparable to the employee benefits of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation and at a rate of contribution by the employee not greater than the rate that was applicable in respect of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation; and

Hypothesis: (b) is a clause referring to sick leave benefits.

There is barely enough context to find out what (b) is referring to; however, it seems to be referring to employee benefits or unemployment benefits, not sick leave / medical leave benefits. The system was fooled because, like me, it did not have the necessary context to judge otherwise.

(b) adalah setanding dengan faedah pekerja pekerja itu serta-merta sebelum berhenti menjadi pekerja perbadanan pelabuhan tempatan dan pada kadar caruman oleh pekerja tidak lebih daripada kadar yang terpakai berkenaan dengan pekerja itu serta-merta sebelum berhenti menjadi pekerja perbadanan pelabuhan tempatan; dan

(b) ialah klausa yang merujuk kepada faedah cuti sakit.


Premise: More sometimes than people in foreign countries. And we need to do something about that. Not with the measure that leaves the majority of them without any real basic help until the next president's term of four years is over. But right away. And that means doing it under the Medicare program.

Hypothesis: The next president's term will be more than 1,825 days long.

The next president's term will be 4 years, and 1,825 days is 5 years. It's difficult because I used days as the measurement instead of years which confused the system.

Lebih kadang-kadang daripada orang di negara asing. Dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang itu. Bukan dengan langkah yang menyebabkan majoriti mereka tanpa bantuan asas sebenar sehingga tempoh empat tahun presiden akan datang berakhir. Tetapi dengan segera. Dan ini bermakna melakukannya di bawah program Medicare.

Penggal presiden akan datang adalah lebih daripada 1,825 hari.


Premise: All right, let me explain to you why it's important to me. I have a list. This is an economic statute. The harms that seem to be caused by it, the extension, I've listed as follows, approximate numbers, made up, but magnitude correct. The existing copyright holders who survive, their copyright survives 70 years, who have already been paid, on the numbers that were given, about $24 billion or more, will receive an extra $6 billion.

Hypothesis: The copyrights will survive for more than 30,000 days.

The copyrights will survive for 70 years, which is only 25,550 days. It's difficult because it's an odd measurement and measurements like this seem to easily confuse the system.

Baiklah, izinkan saya menerangkan kepada anda mengapa ia penting bagi saya. Saya ada senarai. Ini adalah undang-undang ekonomi. Kemudaratan yang nampaknya disebabkan olehnya, sambungan, saya telah senaraikan seperti berikut, anggaran nombor, dibuat, tetapi magnitud betul. Pemegang hak cipta sedia ada yang masih hidup, hak cipta mereka bertahan 70 tahun, yang telah dibayar, pada nombor yang diberikan, kira-kira $24 bilion atau lebih, akan menerima tambahan $6 bilion.

Hak cipta akan bertahan selama lebih daripada 30,000 hari.


Premise: Given the complexity of the issue, we all hope that tomorrow, when the Canadian and provincial ministers of health meet, they will able, first of all, to reach a consensus and then, let us hope, to initiate a settlement process that is satisfactory to victims and their families, and in keeping with the way our health institutions operate in Canada.

Hypothesis: The Canadian and provincial ministers of health will not meet in the same building.

I fooled the system be rephrasing a line from the text.

Memandangkan kerumitan isu ini, kita semua berharap esok, apabila menteri kesihatan Kanada dan wilayah bertemu, mereka akan dapat, pertama sekali, mencapai kata sepakat dan kemudian, marilah kita berharap, untuk memulakan proses penyelesaian yang memuaskan. kepada mangsa dan keluarga mereka, dan selaras dengan cara institusi kesihatan kita beroperasi di Kanada.

Menteri kesihatan Kanada dan wilayah tidak akan bertemu di bangunan yang sama.


Premise: When an agreement of this nature was being negotiated, the governments of the day, both governments-because I hold the Government of British Columbia equally responsible-should have understood from the very beginning that if they wanted it accepted by the people of British Columbia they had to include the people of British Columbia in the negotiations so that there would be an acceptance level there.

Hypothesis: The British Columbia people accept the government negotiations, as they include them.

This states opposite of what has happened, but the agent found the wording of text difficult to determine.

Apabila persetujuan sifat ini dirundingkan, kerajaan pada hari itu, kedua-dua kerajaan-kerana saya memegang kerajaan British Columbia sama-sama bertanggungjawab-harus difahami dari awal lagi bahawa jika mereka menginginkannya diterima oleh rakyat British Columbia, mereka Perlu memasukkan rakyat British Columbia dalam rundingan supaya akan ada tahap penerimaan di sana.

Rakyat British Columbia menerima rundingan kerajaan, kerana mereka termasuk mereka.


Premise: It has also happened recently in the area of justice, with the Young Offenders Act, a field where the province of Quebec is doing exceptionally well and where it is now being told by the federal government to move aside and implement the federal policy, a more punitive policy than that of Quebec, where there is a coalition in this area.

Hypothesis: Recently the president told Quebec  federal government to help him come up with a good law for the Young offenders acts

they told the federal government to move aside

Ia juga berlaku baru-baru ini dalam bidang keadilan, dengan Akta Pesalah Muda, bidang di mana wilayah Quebec menunjukkan prestasi yang sangat baik dan di mana ia kini diberitahu oleh kerajaan persekutuan untuk mengetepikan dan melaksanakan dasar persekutuan, lebih dasar punitif daripada Quebec, di mana terdapat gabungan di kawasan ini.

Baru-baru ini presiden memberitahu kerajaan persekutuan Quebec untuk membantunya menghasilkan undang-undang yang baik untuk perbuatan pesalah Muda


Premise: The fact is that in too many parts of our country, we still have discrimination. And affirmative action is not just something that applies to people of color. Some people have a mistaken view of it in America. It also is with respect to women, it's with respect to other efforts to try to reach out and be inclusive in our country.

Hypothesis: Affirmative action is something that usually applies to people of non color.

It states that affirmative action is not just something that applies to people of color; it is not something that 'usually applies to people of non color'.

Hakikatnya di banyak tempat di negara kita, kita masih mempunyai diskriminasi. Dan tindakan afirmatif bukan hanya sesuatu yang terpakai kepada orang kulit berwarna. Sesetengah orang mempunyai pandangan yang salah mengenainya di Amerika. Ia juga berkenaan dengan wanita, berkenaan dengan usaha lain untuk cuba mendekati dan menjadi inklusif di negara kita.

Tindakan afirmatif ialah sesuatu yang biasanya dikenakan kepada orang bukan kulit berwarna.


Premise: You work that out. Let's get back on the record here, because we've got people waiting and I want to get going. You'll have to work that out. But I will tell you in concluding that if it is at night, if you do it at night, I will give you my home number, and you can contact me so we get this finished. If we have to do that, we'll do it so we get it finished. I will not attend the deposition, though. I stopped doing that when I got this job. Anything else?

Hypothesis: I never attended depositions before getting this job.

The text states I stopped attending depositions when I got this job, indicating that I attended depositions before getting this job.

Anda selesaikan itu. Mari kita kembali pada rekod di sini, kerana kita mempunyai orang yang menunggu dan saya mahu pergi. Anda perlu menyelesaikannya. Tetapi saya akan memberitahu anda sebagai kesimpulan bahawa jika ia pada waktu malam, jika anda melakukannya pada waktu malam, saya akan memberikan anda nombor rumah saya, dan anda boleh menghubungi saya supaya kami menyelesaikannya. Jika kita perlu berbuat demikian, kita akan melakukannya supaya kita menyelesaikannya. Saya tidak akan menghadiri deposisi, walaupun. Saya berhenti berbuat demikian apabila saya mendapat pekerjaan ini. Apa-apa lagi?

Saya tidak pernah menghadiri deposit sebelum mendapat pekerjaan ini.


Premise: But I'll tell you this. I'm also a former law enforcement officer. I ran one of the largest district attorney's offices in America, one of the ten largest. I put people behind bars for the rest of their life. I've broken up organized crime. I know something about prosecuting.

Hypothesis: District attorneys prosecute from behind bars.

District attorneys put people behind bars, they do not prosecute behind them themselves. The AI has conflated the wrong ideas.

Tetapi saya akan memberitahu anda ini. Saya juga bekas pegawai penguatkuasa undang-undang. Saya mengendalikan salah satu pejabat peguam daerah terbesar di Amerika, salah satu daripada sepuluh pejabat terbesar. Saya meletakkan orang di belakang bar sepanjang hayat mereka. Saya telah memecahkan jenayah terancang. Saya tahu sesuatu tentang pendakwaan.

Peguam daerah mendakwa dari balik penjara.


Premise: We're just in a period -- we've got to work to bring it -- my opponent keeps mentioning John McCain, and I'm glad he did. John McCain is for me for president because he understands I have the right view in winning the war on terror and that my plan will succeed in Iraq. And my opponent has got a plan of retreat and defeat in Iraq.

Hypothesis: This candidate doesn't plan to stay in Iraq.

This candidate talks about how it has a plan to win the war on terror, and so they have a plan that involves staying in Iraq.

Kami hanya dalam tempoh -- kami perlu berusaha untuk membawanya -- lawan saya terus menyebut John McCain, dan saya gembira dia melakukannya. John McCain adalah untuk saya sebagai presiden kerana dia faham saya mempunyai pandangan yang betul dalam memenangi perang melawan keganasan dan rancangan saya akan berjaya di Iraq. Dan lawan saya telah mendapat rancangan berundur dan kalah di Iraq.

Calon ini tidak bercadang untuk tinggal di Iraq.


Premise: Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.

Hypothesis: Congress extended the term in the year nineteen hundred seventy one.

It's definitely incorrect because they extended it in the year 1976, not 1971. It's difficult because writing out the year in words easily confuses the system.

Bolehkah kita kembali kepada soalan Hakim O'Connor? Untuk menjadikannya sangat spesifik, jika kami bersetuju dengan anda, adakah itu bermakna kami, pada dasarnya, perlu memegang lanjutan 1976 tidak mengikut perlembagaan? Maksud saya, pada tahun 1976, Kongres melanjutkan tempoh daripada 28 tahun boleh diperbaharui sekali, kepada hayat pengarang ditambah 50 tahun. Sekarang mereka memanjangkan hayat pengarangnya ditambah 70. Jika yang kedua tidak mengikut perlembagaan pada teori anda, bagaimana mungkin yang pertama tidak? Dan jika yang pertama, huru-hara yang akan berlaku akan menjadi dahsyat.

Kongres melanjutkan tempohnya pada tahun sembilan belas ratus tujuh puluh satu.


Premise: For 14 long years, the bargaining relationship between the alliance and Treasury Board for the workers represented at Table 2 has been frustrated by government interventions that have been designed to control, restrain and freeze wages, erode employment security and, yes, even renege on signing collective agreements.

Hypothesis: The alliance and Treasury Board for the workers are represented at all the tables.

The alliance and Treasury Board for the workers are represented at Table 2.

Selama 14 tahun yang panjang, hubungan tawar-menawar antara perikatan dan Lembaga Perbendaharaan untuk pekerja yang diwakili di Jadual 2 telah dikecewakan oleh campur tangan kerajaan yang telah direka untuk mengawal, menyekat dan membekukan gaji, menghakis keselamatan pekerjaan dan, ya, malah mengingkari tandatangan. perjanjian kolektif.

Perikatan dan Lembaga Perbendaharaan untuk pekerja diwakili di semua meja.