Premise: I got some of the details wrong last week in some of the examples that I used, Jim, and I'm sorry about that. And I'm going to try to do better. One of the reasons I regret it is that getting a detail wrong interfered several times with the point that I was trying to make.

Hypothesis: The writer is under Jim

It is an apology but you do not know if one is above another in power

Saya mendapat beberapa butiran yang salah minggu lepas dalam beberapa contoh yang saya gunakan, Jim, dan saya minta maaf mengenainya. Dan saya akan cuba melakukan yang lebih baik. Salah satu sebab yang saya kesal adalah kerana mendapatkan perincian yang salah telah mengganggu beberapa kali perkara yang saya cuba sampaikan.


Premise: I think that we have to put more emphasis on early learning and pre-school. Now, here is how that connects with all the rest of what we've been talking about. If you have -- if you squander the surplus on a huge tax cut that goes mostly to those at the top, then you can't make education the top priority.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes squandering a smaller part of the surplus on a tiny tax cut is ok.

We do know that the speaker believes squandering the surplus on a huge tax cut is not ok, but we do not know if they believe  squandering a smaller part of the surplus on a tiny tax cut is ok -  they may only be against the size of the tax cut, not tax cuts themselves.

Saya berpendapat bahawa kita perlu memberi lebih penekanan kepada pembelajaran awal dan prasekolah. Sekarang, inilah caranya berhubung dengan semua perkara yang lain yang telah kita bincangkan. Jika anda ada -- jika anda mensia-siakan lebihan untuk potongan cukai yang besar yang kebanyakannya diberikan kepada mereka yang berada di atas, maka anda tidak boleh menjadikan pendidikan sebagai keutamaan.

Penceramah percaya mensia-siakan sebahagian kecil daripada lebihan dengan potongan cukai kecil adalah tidak mengapa.


Premise: The bill relates specifically to the fact that under the current provisions of the legislation, if a bill arrives in the hands of a member or a candidate following the election, if it was not received within the required time period in which a candidate or his or her official agent may pay the bill, the only process available now to the member to be able to pay that bill is to get a court order allowing that to happen.

Hypothesis: The bill wasn't accepted

It doesn't state whether it was accepted or not

Rang undang-undang itu berkaitan secara khusus dengan fakta bahawa di bawah peruntukan semasa undang-undang, jika rang undang-undang tiba di tangan ahli atau calon selepas pilihan raya, jika ia tidak diterima dalam tempoh masa yang diperlukan di mana calon atau calonnya. ejen rasminya boleh membayar bil, satu-satunya proses yang tersedia sekarang kepada ahli untuk dapat membayar bil itu ialah mendapatkan perintah mahkamah yang membenarkan perkara itu berlaku.


Premise: What he's suggesting, we're going to cut benefits or we're going to have to raise the retirement age. We may have to take some other reform. But if you've just said, you've promised no changes, does that mean you're just going to leave this as a problem, another problem for our children to solve?

Hypothesis: We are not going to increase spending.

it doesn't state whether spending will increase or decrease.

Apa yang dia cadangkan, kita akan potong faedah atau kita kena naikkan umur persaraan. Kita mungkin perlu melakukan reformasi lain. Tetapi jika anda baru berkata, anda telah berjanji tiada perubahan, adakah itu bermakna anda hanya akan membiarkan ini sebagai masalah, satu lagi masalah untuk anak-anak kita selesaikan?

Kami tidak akan meningkatkan perbelanjaan.


Premise: And so the person you talked to, I say, here's some help, here's some trade adjustment assistance money for you to go a community college in your neighborhood, a community college which is providing the skills necessary to fill the jobs of the 21st century. And that's what I would say to that person.

Hypothesis: You may use the money for your personal needs.

It wasnt mentioned that the money can or cannot be used for personal needs. so it is neither correct or incorrect.

Jadi orang yang anda ajak bercakap, saya katakan, inilah sedikit bantuan, inilah beberapa wang bantuan pelarasan perdagangan untuk anda pergi ke kolej komuniti di kawasan kejiranan anda, kolej komuniti yang menyediakan kemahiran yang diperlukan untuk mengisi pekerjaan abad ke-21. Dan itulah yang saya akan katakan kepada orang itu.

Anda boleh menggunakan wang itu untuk keperluan peribadi anda.


Premise: No. There were statements made by many of the school board members that I found objectionable. It's just that Mr. Buckingham always seemed to say very inappropriate things. But in addition, Alan Bonsell said very inappropriate things, and Noel Weinrich said very inappropriate things. It's just that I didn't give much credit to Noel Weinrich's comments because he would say things like, Darwin's at least what, 60 years old, a theory becomes a theory if you say it over and over again. Those are the kind of things he would say. But they were all very outspoken.

Hypothesis: A woman is speaking

Tidak. Terdapat kenyataan yang dibuat oleh ramai ahli lembaga sekolah yang saya rasa tidak menyenangkan. Cuma En. Buckingham nampaknya selalu berkata perkara yang sangat tidak patut. Tetapi sebagai tambahan, Alan Bonsell mengatakan perkara yang sangat tidak sesuai, dan Noel Weinrich berkata perkara yang sangat tidak sesuai. Cuma saya tidak memberi banyak kredit kepada komen Noel Weinrich kerana dia akan berkata seperti, Darwin sekurang-kurangnya apa, 60 tahun, teori menjadi teori jika anda mengatakannya berulang kali. Itulah jenis perkara yang akan dia katakan. Tetapi mereka semua sangat lantang.


Premise: I am now ready to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. member for St. Albert concerning the procedural acceptability of Bill C-78, an act to establish the Public Sector Pension Investment Board, to amend the Public Service Superannuation Act, the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act, the Defence Services Pension Continuation Act, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Pension Continuation Act, the Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act and the Canada Post Corporation Act and to make a consequential amendment to another act.

Hypothesis: nobody cared about the colour of the sky.

The colour of the sky did not matter to these people.

Saya kini bersedia untuk memutuskan perkara perintah yang dibangkitkan oleh Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk St. Albert mengenai penerimaan prosedur Rang Undang-Undang C-78, akta untuk menubuhkan Lembaga Pelaburan Pencen Sektor Awam, untuk meminda Akta Persaraan Perkhidmatan Awam, Akta Persaraan Pasukan Kanada, Akta Persaraan Polis Diraja Kanada, Pertahanan Akta Penerusan Pencen Perkhidmatan, Akta Penerusan Pencen Polis Diraja Kanada, Akta Elaun Bersara Ahli Parlimen dan Akta Canada Post Corporation dan untuk membuat pindaan berbangkit kepada akta lain.

tiada siapa yang mengambil berat tentang warna langit.


Premise: It was no accident that the three major urban transit companies in Quebec, namely the Socit de transport de la Communaut urbaine de Montral, Socit de transport de Laval and Socit de transport de la rive sud de Montral, as well as most if not all their unions and employees are asking that we support a progressive and innovative policy.

Hypothesis: There are exactly 4 transportation companies in Quebec.

This is neither definitively correct or incorrect based on the context as it states there are 3 major companies, which is not exhaustive of any minor/lesser companies that may exist in Quebec.

Bukan suatu kebetulan bahawa tiga syarikat transit bandar utama di Quebec, iaitu Socit de transport de la Communaut urbaine de Montral, Socit de transport de Laval dan Socit de transport de la rive sud de Montral, serta kebanyakan jika tidak semua mereka kesatuan sekerja dan pekerja meminta kami menyokong dasar yang progresif dan inovatif.

Terdapat tepat 4 syarikat pengangkutan di Quebec.


Premise: We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that the limits, both express and implied, in the Copyright Clause, have some meaning. The Feist opinion very clearly sets out the implied limits, a per se limit for originality, for the reasons Justice Breyer was trying to get me to say.

Hypothesis: The Copyright Clause is not being upheld

It's unknown if it is being upheld or not

Kami mempunyai 125 tahun sejarah Mahkamah ini memastikan bahawa had, baik tersurat mahupun tersirat, dalam Klausa Hak Cipta, mempunyai makna tertentu. Pendapat Feist dengan sangat jelas menetapkan had tersirat, had per se untuk keaslian, atas sebab Hakim Breyer cuba membuat saya berkata.


Premise: Actually, Mr. Muise may be at a disadvantage here. I did agree with Steve that we -he has an affidavit from someone who has indicated they have collected newspaper articles. So with respect to that issue, there's no objection. I have agreed that she has authenticated what she did to produce this article.

Hypothesis: Steve knew who he got an affidavit from

It doesn't say exactly who gave him the affidavit, so I tested this and figured out that it assumed steve knew the person.

Sebenarnya, Encik Muise mungkin berada dalam keadaan yang kurang baik di sini. Saya memang bersetuju dengan Steve bahawa kami -dia mempunyai afidavit daripada seseorang yang telah menyatakan mereka telah mengumpul artikel akhbar. Jadi berkenaan dengan isu itu, tiada bantahan. Saya telah bersetuju bahawa dia telah mengesahkan apa yang dia lakukan untuk menghasilkan artikel ini.

Steve tahu dari siapa dia mendapat afidavit


Premise: That's what it's meant to do. And when it gets overextended, morale drops. I strongly believe we need to have a military presence in the peninsula, not only to keep the peace in the peninsula, but to keep regional stability. And I strongly believe we need to keep a presence in NATO, but I'm going to be judicious as to how to use the military.

Hypothesis: The speaker believe they need to have a military presence in Korean Peninsula.

There are a lot of peninsula in the world ant not just the Korean peninsula.

Itulah yang dimaksudkan untuk dilakukan. Dan apabila ia dipanjangkan, semangat jatuh. Saya amat percaya kita perlu mempunyai kehadiran tentera di semenanjung, bukan sahaja untuk menjaga keamanan di semenanjung, tetapi untuk menjaga kestabilan serantau. Dan saya sangat percaya kita perlu mengekalkan kehadiran dalam NATO, tetapi saya akan berhati-hati tentang cara menggunakan tentera.

Penceramah percaya bahawa mereka perlu mempunyai kehadiran ketenteraan di Semenanjung Korea.


Premise: They leave all civility, take a cowardly gun and go to the neighbour's farmhouse, whose cousin is married to theirs, then murder the boy who could become a soldier, humiliate and renounce all sense of community, burn the home, steal the livestock, take any money from the victims and send the remaining souls, having lost all, on a foot journey into the unknown.

Hypothesis: The boy wanted to become a soldier

The context only states the boy could become a soldier, it doesn't mention if he wanted to or not. The system likely mistook the comment for the boy's opinion.

Mereka meninggalkan semua kesopanan, mengambil pistol pengecut dan pergi ke rumah ladang jiran, yang sepupunya berkahwin dengan mereka, kemudian membunuh budak lelaki yang boleh menjadi askar, memalukan dan meninggalkan semua rasa masyarakat, membakar rumah, mencuri ternakan, mengambil apa-apa wang daripada mangsa dan menghantar jiwa yang tinggal, setelah kehilangan semua, dalam perjalanan kaki ke tempat yang tidak diketahui.


Premise: Well, I think we need tough enforcement of the civil rights laws. I think we still need affirmative action. I would pass a hate crimes law, as I said, and I guess I had misunderstood the governor's previous position. The Byrd family may have a misunderstanding of it in Texas also. But I would like to shift, if I could, to the big issue of education.

Hypothesis: Gore didn't realize there was a hate crime statute

There is not mention of Gore or a statute so it should be neither. Not sure of all statements, that's the one the AI marked incorrect.

Baiklah, saya fikir kita memerlukan penguatkuasaan yang tegas terhadap undang-undang hak sivil. Saya rasa kita masih memerlukan tindakan afirmatif. Saya akan meluluskan undang-undang jenayah kebencian, seperti yang saya katakan, dan saya rasa saya telah salah faham kedudukan gabenor sebelum ini. Keluarga Byrd mungkin mempunyai salah faham tentangnya di Texas juga. Tetapi saya ingin beralih, jika boleh, kepada isu besar pendidikan.

Gore tidak menyedari terdapat statut jenayah benci


Premise: That we spent -- the top 1% receive 223 as opposed to 445 billion in new spending. The top -- let's talk about my tax plan. The top 1% will pay one-third of all the federal income taxes. And in return, get one-fifth of the benefits, because most of the tax reductions go to the people at the bottom end of the economic ladder.

Hypothesis: The top 1% oppose paying one-third of all the federal income taxes and in return, get one-fifth of the benefits.

it does not specify if they oppose or not so it is neither. That was a hard passage to trick the AI and I'm not sure why this last try finally fooled it.

Bahawa kami membelanjakan - 1% teratas menerima 223 berbanding 445 bilion perbelanjaan baru. Bahagian atas - mari kita bercakap mengenai pelan cukai saya. 1% teratas akan membayar satu pertiga daripada semua cukai pendapatan persekutuan. Dan sebagai balasan, dapatkan seperlima manfaat, kerana kebanyakan pengurangan cukai pergi ke rakyat di hujung bawah tangga ekonomi.

1% teratas menentang membayar satu pertiga daripada semua cukai pendapatan persekutuan dan sebagai balasan, dapatkan satu perlima daripada faedah.


Premise: The use of diplomacy in this situation has already, well, it goes hour-by-hour and day-by-day now. It's a very tense situation there. But in the last 24 hours there has been some subsiding of the violence there. It's too much to hope that this is going to continue, but I do hope that it will continue.

Hypothesis: The violence is gone for good.

The violence had gone down some but there is no gurantee it's gone for good.

Penggunaan diplomasi dalam situasi ini sudah, baik, ia berjalan dari jam demi jam dan hari demi hari sekarang. Keadaan di sana sangat tegang. Tetapi dalam tempoh 24 jam yang lalu terdapat beberapa pengurangan keganasan di sana. Terlalu banyak untuk mengharapkan ini akan berterusan, tetapi saya berharap ia akan berterusan.


Premise: It states that we should not negotiate any further liberalization of trade or investment at the Seattle meeting of the WTO or the free trade area of the Americas without first securing enforceable international rules on core labour standards, environmental protection, cultural diversity, the preservation of public health care and public education.

Hypothesis: there should be enforcible rules for some aspects of health care and public education but not other aspects

not every aspect was listed so some of it was true and some was not the AI cannot determine or sort out things like that

Ia menyatakan bahawa kita tidak sepatutnya merundingkan sebarang liberalisasi perdagangan atau pelaburan selanjutnya pada mesyuarat Seattle WTO atau kawasan perdagangan bebas di Amerika tanpa terlebih dahulu mendapatkan peraturan antarabangsa yang boleh dikuatkuasakan mengenai piawaian buruh teras, perlindungan alam sekitar, kepelbagaian budaya, pemuliharaan awam. penjagaan kesihatan dan pendidikan awam.

perlu ada peraturan yang boleh dikuatkuasakan untuk beberapa aspek penjagaan kesihatan dan pendidikan awam tetapi bukan aspek lain


Premise: Mr. Speaker, what the hon. member should know is what we said three weeks ago when the auditor general's report was tabled, namely that we have been at work in Health Canada for some years putting in place across the land technology to ensure that pharmacists will be able to ascertain that every prescription presented is legitimate and should be filled.

Hypothesis: The technology assures that every prescription presented is legitimate.

The purpose is to ascertain if the technology works.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, apa yang Berhormat. ahli perlu tahu adalah apa yang kami katakan tiga minggu lalu apabila laporan ketua juruaudit dibentangkan, iaitu kami telah bekerja di Health Canada selama beberapa tahun melaksanakan teknologi tanah untuk memastikan ahli farmasi dapat memastikan bahawa setiap preskripsi dibentangkan adalah sah dan perlu diisi.

Teknologi ini memastikan bahawa setiap preskripsi yang dikemukakan adalah sah.


Premise: My colleague from West Nova indicated that very thing, that we could accept some of the proposed changes, good changes which the Liberals have put forward but that we could not accept them based on the facts, figures and numbers we have at this time with respect to the taxation rates which will be attached to this bill.

Hypothesis: I [the speaker] am from West Nova.

The text refers to "My colleague from West Nova," which doesn't exclude the possibility that "I" am also from West Nova. The model missed this.

Rakan sekerja saya dari West Nova menyatakan bahawa kami boleh menerima beberapa perubahan yang dicadangkan, perubahan yang baik yang telah dikemukakan oleh Liberal tetapi kami tidak boleh menerimanya berdasarkan fakta, angka dan nombor yang kami ada pada masa ini dengan hormat kepada kadar cukai yang akan dilampirkan pada bil ini.

Saya [penceramah] berasal dari Nova Barat.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, as we celebrate the 50th anniversaries of both the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the founding of the State of Israel I would like to thank the government House leader and the House leaders of all parties for taking a principled stand on the issue of the holocaust denial.

Hypothesis: Speaker is 20 years old.

Age of Mr. Speaker is unknown and therefore neither correct or incorrect. I think the bot got it wrong because they mention the 50th anniversaries but that is not relevant to the Speaker's age.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, semasa kita meraikan ulang tahun ke-50 Deklarasi Hak Asasi Manusia Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu dan penubuhan Negara Israel, saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada ketua Dewan kerajaan dan pemimpin Dewan semua pihak kerana mengambil pendirian berprinsip dalam isu penafian holocaust.


Premise: But for them, they get the benefit of the longer term if you don't apply it to an existing copyright. I mean, if you say you need 70 years because of changes in the economy to encourage works, you grant 70 for the future, but why does that, making that apply to somebody provided him?

Hypothesis: We will grant 70 years of copyright in the future.

It doesn't say that & it's impossible to know.

Tetapi bagi mereka, mereka mendapat manfaat jangka panjang jika anda tidak menggunakannya pada hak cipta sedia ada. Maksud saya, jika anda katakan anda memerlukan 70 tahun kerana perubahan dalam ekonomi untuk menggalakkan kerja, anda memberi 70 tahun untuk masa depan, tetapi mengapa ia, menjadikannya terpakai kepada seseorang yang menyediakannya?

Kami akan memberikan 70 tahun hak cipta pada masa hadapan.


Premise: I was taught -- I went to a church school and I was taught that the two greatest commandments are: Love the Lord, your God, with all your mind, your body and your soul, and love your neighbor as yourself. And frankly, I think we have a lot more loving of our neighbor to do in this country and on this planet.

Hypothesis: God is believed by bart

Saya telah diajar -- saya pergi ke sekolah gereja dan saya diajar bahawa dua perintah terbesar ialah: Kasihilah Tuhan, Tuhanmu, dengan segenap akal budimu, tubuhmu dan jiwamu, dan kasihi sesamamu seperti dirimu sendiri. Dan terus terang, saya rasa kita mempunyai lebih banyak kasih sayang terhadap jiran kita untuk dilakukan di negara ini dan di planet ini.


Premise: I wonder how he expects us to put forward a strong position on these issues if we are not part of the World Trade Organization or if we were not in a position, with meetings like Seattle, where we can pull together different countries from around the world that have a similar position to ours.

Hypothesis: the sky had no clouds.

Saya tertanya-tanya bagaimana dia mengharapkan kita mengemukakan pendirian yang kukuh mengenai isu-isu ini jika kita bukan sebahagian daripada Pertubuhan Perdagangan Dunia atau jika kita tidak berada dalam kedudukan, dengan mesyuarat seperti Seattle, di mana kita boleh mengumpulkan negara yang berbeza dari seluruh dunia yang mempunyai kedudukan yang sama dengan kita.


Premise: Yes. Two of them, my oldest is at the high school, the Dover High School, and then I have -- the next one is at the Weiglestown Elementary School. And my son is hearing-impaired, so he is charged with the education of Dover School District, meaning that they have to provide his education, but he actually attends classes at a hearing-impaired classroom.

Hypothesis: Both schools  can accommodate for special needs students.

We only know that one school accommodates for hearing impaired but not if both can accommodate for other special needs.

ya. Dua daripada mereka, anak sulung saya berada di sekolah menengah, Sekolah Tinggi Dover, dan kemudian saya -- yang seterusnya ialah di Sekolah Rendah Weiglestown. Dan anak saya cacat pendengaran, jadi dia didakwa dengan pendidikan Daerah Sekolah Dover, bermakna mereka perlu menyediakan pendidikannya, tetapi dia sebenarnya menghadiri kelas di bilik darjah cacat pendengaran.

Kedua-dua sekolah boleh menampung murid berkeperluan khas.


Premise: Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.

Hypothesis: The Chair is the person this speech is coming from

It is possible that the Chair is talking about themselves in the third person, and that they are setting guidelines for that they expect.

Sekali lagi saya akan menasihati semua ahli bahawa jika mereka akan meregangkan kredibiliti hujah mereka mengenai Rang Undang-Undang C-4 dengan merujuk kepada isu-isu lain, yang sememangnya merupakan keistimewaan mereka, adalah lebih baik untuk menggunakan sedikit imaginasi dan pastikan untuk meneruskan untuk datang ke batu ujian dan tidak mencabar Pengerusi dengan memaksa Pengerusi membuat keputusan.

Pengerusi adalah orang yang berasal dari ucapan ini


Premise: An October 22, 1998 article by Dianne Rinehart reported that according to an Angus Read poll, 51 per cent of British Columbians viewed the Nisga'a Final Agreement as a step in the right direction, with 33 per cent of those polled holding the opposite view and 16 per cent unsure of their views.

Hypothesis: 100% of British Columbians responded to the Angus Read poll.

We dont know what percentage of the total population responded to the poll; the percentages represent the views of those who were polled only.

Artikel 22 Oktober 1998 oleh Dianne Rinehart melaporkan bahawa menurut tinjauan pendapat Angus Read, 51 peratus rakyat British Columbia melihat Perjanjian Akhir Nisga'a sebagai langkah ke arah yang betul, dengan 33 peratus daripada mereka yang ditinjau berpandangan bertentangan dan 16 peratus tidak pasti dengan pandangan mereka.

100% rakyat British Columbia menjawab tinjauan pendapat Angus Read.


Premise: A lot of initials from a guy who's not from Washington, isn't it? Anyway, he co-sponsored McCain-Feingold, and yet he didn't. And so I think this is an issue. I found it to be an issue in trying to defend my tax relief package. I thought there was some exaggerations about the numbers.

Hypothesis: people from washington have lots on initials

They could, or they could not. no way to tell

Banyak inisial dari seorang lelaki yang bukan dari Washington, bukan? Bagaimanapun, dia menaja bersama McCain-Feingold, namun dia tidak melakukannya. Jadi saya fikir ini adalah satu isu. Saya mendapati ia menjadi isu dalam usaha mempertahankan pakej pelepasan cukai saya. Saya fikir terdapat beberapa keterlaluan tentang nombor.

orang dari washington mempunyai banyak pada parap


Premise: Well, because there wasn't really a clear resolution to what had occurred the previous meeting. In addition, I was very angry when I left the June 7th meeting just because of the demeanor of the school board and the things that were being said. And, honestly, I thought that maybe it would set me into labor because of, you know, being angry, and at that point in time I was past my due date, in addition to caring about my children's education and everything I said previously.

Hypothesis: I gave birth on the way home from the meeting.

We do not know when the author gave birth, only that she was past her due date.

Nah, kerana tidak ada penyelesaian yang jelas tentang apa yang telah berlaku dalam mesyuarat sebelumnya. Tambahan pula, saya sangat marah apabila meninggalkan mesyuarat 7 Jun hanya kerana gelagat dewan sekolah dan perkara yang diperkatakan. Dan, secara jujur, saya fikir mungkin ia akan menyebabkan saya bersalin kerana, anda tahu, marah, dan pada masa itu saya melepasi tarikh akhir saya, selain mengambil berat tentang pendidikan anak-anak saya dan semua yang saya katakan sebelum ini.

Saya bersalin dalam perjalanan pulang dari mesyuarat.


Premise: In the last four years, the federal government has taken hundreds of millions of dollars from the economy of Quebec and the Atlantic provinces by closing military bases, reducing unemployment insurance benefits, slashing budgets for regional development, and reducing tax transfers for health, welfare and education.

Hypothesis: Quebec and the Atlantic provinces have become partners

It's unknown if they've formed an alliance against the federal government

Dalam empat tahun yang lalu, kerajaan persekutuan telah mengambil ratusan juta dolar daripada ekonomi wilayah Quebec dan Atlantik dengan menutup pangkalan tentera, mengurangkan faedah insurans pengangguran, mengurangkan belanjawan untuk pembangunan wilayah, dan mengurangkan pemindahan cukai untuk kesihatan, kebajikan dan pendidikan.

Quebec dan wilayah Atlantik telah menjadi rakan kongsi


Premise: There is ample opportunity for discussion in this House and there will be ample opportunity for continued discussion outside of this House, as every member of the government will be out in their constituencies consulting with their constituents, consulting with Canadians about the priorities and whether we have these priorities right and what we should be doing with our fiscal dividend when that dividend appears.

Hypothesis: The house represents the US.

The house represents Canadians in this statement.

Terdapat banyak peluang untuk perbincangan di Dewan ini dan akan ada banyak peluang untuk perbincangan berterusan di luar Dewan ini, kerana setiap ahli kerajaan akan berada di kawasan pilihan raya mereka untuk berunding dengan pengundi mereka, berunding dengan orang Kanada tentang keutamaan dan sama ada kita mempunyai keutamaan ini betul dan apa yang patut kita lakukan dengan dividen fiskal kita apabila dividen itu muncul.


Premise: Finally we heard the Reform leader offer up his astounding statement about how in his view one had to recognize that there was, I guess, a pretty even balance between the international consensus that exists around the globe today among highly respected scientists, among independent peer review scientific evidence and the so-called scientific evidence that is offered up by the high paid lobbyists on behalf of the narrowest of economic interests.

Hypothesis: Lobbyists are respected among scientists.

It states the consensus among these groups of people, not respect. Also, this is one persons opinion and not that of the entire scientific community. There were enough correct words to make the AI think it fell into one category or the other.

Akhirnya kami mendengar pemimpin Pembaharuan itu menawarkan kenyataannya yang mengagumkan tentang bagaimana pada pandangannya seseorang itu harus menyedari bahawa terdapat, saya rasa, keseimbangan yang cukup sekata antara konsensus antarabangsa yang wujud di seluruh dunia hari ini di kalangan saintis yang sangat dihormati, di kalangan kajian rakan sebaya bebas. bukti saintifik dan apa yang dipanggil bukti saintifik yang ditawarkan oleh pelobi bergaji tinggi bagi pihak kepentingan ekonomi yang paling sempit.


Premise: If the verifier determines that a proposed land code and a proposed community approval process of a first nation are in accordance with the Framework Agreement and this Act, the council of the first nation may submit the proposed land code and the individual agreement to the first nation members for their approval.

Hypothesis: Verifies make minimum wage

It is uncertain how much verifies make, I think the model got confused because there really is no way to tell.

Jika pengesah menentukan bahawa kod tanah yang dicadangkan dan proses kelulusan komuniti yang dicadangkan bagi negara pertama adalah mengikut Perjanjian Rangka Kerja dan Akta ini, majlis negara pertama boleh mengemukakan cadangan kod tanah dan perjanjian individu kepada negara pertama. ahli untuk kelulusan mereka.


Premise: And let me say again, Detroit is rearing to go on that. We differ on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as I have said. We differ on whether or not pollution controls ought to be voluntary. I don't think you can -- I don't think you can get results that way.

Hypothesis: Results may or may not be received this way.

It says he doesnt think they can get results that way.

Dan biar saya katakan sekali lagi, Detroit sedang membesar untuk meneruskannya. Kami berbeza pendapat mengenai Perlindungan Hidupan Liar Kebangsaan Artik, seperti yang saya katakan. Kami berbeza pendapat tentang sama ada kawalan pencemaran harus dilakukan secara sukarela atau tidak. Saya tidak fikir anda boleh -- saya tidak fikir anda boleh mendapatkan hasil seperti itu.

Keputusan mungkin atau mungkin tidak diterima dengan cara ini.


Premise: In recent months we have witnessed one of the most disturbing human tragedies since the second world war: ethnic cleansing, deportation and dispossession of close to one million Kosovars, who have been deprived on both a number of civil rights and their right to self-government by the Milosevic regime for some ten years now.

Hypothesis: Milosevic has gone into retirement.

It is unclear if Milosevic has gone into retirement. The system was confused by the context.

Dalam beberapa bulan kebelakangan ini kita telah menyaksikan salah satu tragedi manusia yang paling membimbangkan sejak perang dunia kedua: pembersihan etnik, pengusiran dan perampasan hampir sejuta warga Kosovar, yang telah dilucutkan kedua-dua beberapa hak sivil dan hak mereka untuk berkerajaan sendiri. oleh rejim Milosevic selama kira-kira sepuluh tahun sekarang.


Premise: Late in '04 my daughter came home from school, and I was discussing kind of what was going on in the district with her. And she looked at me and she said, Well, Mom, evolution is a lie, what kind of Christian are you, anyway, which I found to be very upsetting.

Hypothesis: Christian is the faith of arnold

Lewat '04 anak perempuan saya pulang dari sekolah, dan saya berbincang tentang perkara yang berlaku di daerah dengannya. Dan dia memandang saya dan dia berkata, Baiklah, Ibu, evolusi adalah pembohongan, apakah jenis orang Kristian anda, bagaimanapun, yang saya dapati sangat menjengkelkan.


Premise: The first is to give the people of Canada more democratic control over representation in the upper house by electing those representatives, and to ensure that senators, whoever they are and whatever they are and whatever they do, are servants of the people of Canada, not servants of the party of the prime minister who appointed them.

Hypothesis: Democratic control never happened.

Yang pertama adalah untuk memberi rakyat Kanada kawalan yang lebih demokratik ke atas perwakilan di dewan atasan dengan memilih wakil-wakil tersebut, dan untuk memastikan bahawa senator, siapa pun mereka dan apa sahaja mereka dan apa sahaja yang mereka lakukan, adalah pelayan rakyat Kanada, bukan. penjawat parti perdana menteri yang melantik mereka.


Premise: If we want to generate the type of wealth and the type of economic growth required to address all the social issues and challenges we heard about from coast to coast to coast, then there is no question in my mind that the only way we can do that is to put a plan together that speaks to the issue of improving the standard of living for people.

Hypothesis: The government will create wealth

The government is being convinced to, but we don’t know either way

Jika kita ingin menjana jenis kekayaan dan jenis pertumbuhan ekonomi yang diperlukan untuk menangani semua isu dan cabaran sosial yang kita dengar dari pantai ke pantai ke pantai, maka tidak ada persoalan dalam fikiran saya bahawa satu-satunya cara kita boleh melakukannya adalah untuk menyusun satu rancangan yang membicarakan isu peningkatan taraf hidup rakyat.


Premise: And Haitians have their problems, but we gave them a chance to restore democracy. That's really about all we can do. But if you have a situation like that right in our backyard with chaos about to break out and flotillas forming to come across the water, and all kinds of violence there, right in one of our neighboring countries there, then I think that we did the right thing there.

Hypothesis: Haitians will ally with China to fight the US in 2024

We have no idea what will happen in the year 2024, anything is possible

Dan orang Haiti mempunyai masalah mereka, tetapi kami memberi mereka peluang untuk memulihkan demokrasi. Itu sahaja yang boleh kita lakukan. Tetapi jika anda mempunyai situasi seperti itu di halaman belakang rumah kami dengan huru-hara yang hampir pecah dan flotila terbentuk untuk menyeberangi air, dan semua jenis keganasan di sana, betul-betul di salah satu negara jiran kami di sana, maka saya fikir kami telah melakukan perkara yang betul di sana.

Orang Haiti akan bersekutu dengan China untuk memerangi AS pada 2024


Premise: Mr. Speaker, how does the minister explain that the only member of the jury of experts to come from Winnipeg voted in favour of the design proposed by the Winnipeg firm, and that the minister, who is also from Winnipeg as it happens, decided to award this juicy contract to a consortium, one of whose firms is based in his Winnipeg riding?

Hypothesis: The man referred to as Mr. Speaker is also from Winnipeg.

There is no reference made to where "Mr. Speaker" is from.  The minister is not the same as Mr. Speaker.  Nor are any of the other people mentioned as being from Winnipeg.  It's possible Mr. Speaker is from Winnipeg, but there's no proof either way.  I assume the system got confused by all the mentions of people being from Winnipeg and thought that was true of Mr. Speaker, or that Mr. Speaker and one of those people were the same.  But they're not.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, bagaimanakah menteri menjelaskan bahawa satu-satunya ahli juri pakar yang datang dari Winnipeg mengundi menyokong reka bentuk yang dicadangkan oleh firma Winnipeg, dan menteri itu, yang juga dari Winnipeg, memutuskan untuk menganugerahkan kontrak berair ini kepada sebuah konsortium, salah satu firmanya berpangkalan di dalam menunggang Winnipegnya?

Lelaki yang disebut sebagai Tuan Yang di-Pertua juga berasal dari Winnipeg.


Premise: Among the changes made to CEPA, Bill C-32 includes the provision to implement pollution prevention, new procedures for the investigation and assessment of substances and new requirements for toxicity assessments, new provisions respecting fuels, international air and water pollution, motor emissions, federal and aboriginal land protection, the proper disposal of wastes and other matters at sea and the safer export and import of waste.

Hypothesis: CEPA is an organization that is controlled only by government forces.

While the government is involved in this bill, it doesn't mean it is the only involved, but it also could be. The agent found it difficult to determine as it doesn't directly state which parties are involved.

Antara perubahan yang dibuat kepada CEPA, Rang Undang-Undang C-32 termasuk peruntukan untuk melaksanakan pencegahan pencemaran, prosedur baharu untuk penyiasatan dan penilaian bahan dan keperluan baharu untuk penilaian ketoksikan, peruntukan baharu berkenaan bahan api, pencemaran udara dan air antarabangsa, pelepasan motor, persekutuan. dan perlindungan tanah orang asli, pelupusan sisa dan perkara lain yang betul di laut dan eksport dan import sisa yang lebih selamat.

CEPA ialah organisasi yang hanya dikawal oleh pasukan kerajaan.


Premise: To the people of the south shore, the volunteers, the volunteer fire-fighters, ground search and rescue, Coast Guard, emergency health services, soldiers, sailors, aircrew, RCMP and the Halifax fire and police services, I extend not only my own personal gratitude but also the gratitude of all Nova Scotians.

Hypothesis: All the helpers did not want to help

They were being commended for being helpful

Kepada penduduk pantai selatan, sukarelawan, bomba sukarela, mencari dan menyelamat darat, Pengawal Pantai, perkhidmatan kesihatan kecemasan, askar, kelasi, anak kapal, RCMP dan perkhidmatan bomba dan polis Halifax, saya bukan sahaja memperluaskan perkhidmatan saya sendiri. terima kasih peribadi tetapi juga terima kasih semua Nova Scotians.


Premise: But it's important to have credibility and credibility is formed by being strong with your friends and resoluting your determination. One of the reasons why I think it's important for this nation to develop an anti-ballistic missile system that we can share with our allies in the Middle East if need be to keep the peace is to be able to say to the Saddam Husseins of the world or the Iranians, don't dare threaten our friends.

Hypothesis: there's only one way to create crdibility

according to the text we dont know if this is true or not

Tetapi adalah penting untuk mempunyai kredibiliti dan kredibiliti dibentuk dengan menjadi kuat dengan rakan anda dan menetapkan keazaman anda. Salah satu sebab mengapa saya fikir adalah penting bagi negara ini untuk membangunkan sistem peluru berpandu anti-balistik yang boleh kita kongsi dengan sekutu kita di Timur Tengah jika perlu untuk menjaga keamanan adalah untuk dapat berkata kepada Saddam Hussein dunia atau orang Iran, jangan berani mengancam kawan kita.

hanya ada satu cara untuk mencipta kredibiliti


Premise: Well, that's not just uniformity. It's providing incentive to people to publish here, as opposed to publish in Europe, where longer terms might be available. There is an incentive to distribute existing works that may be necessary. It's the consistency that Congress is promoting by saying to individuals, as they might have said when they enacted the Copyright Clause in the first place, we will not only give you 14 years, but if we change our mind tomorrow, and think that a better, a longer period is necessary, we're -- this is consistency, but it's also a matter of fairness, and it's --

Hypothesis: U.S. law is more relaxed.

Nah, itu bukan sekadar keseragaman. Ia memberikan insentif kepada orang ramai untuk menerbitkan di sini, berbanding menerbitkan di Eropah, di mana syarat yang lebih panjang mungkin tersedia. Terdapat insentif untuk mengedarkan karya sedia ada yang mungkin perlu. Ia adalah konsistensi yang dipromosikan oleh Kongres dengan mengatakan kepada individu, seperti yang mereka mungkin katakan semasa mereka menggubal Fasal Hak Cipta pada mulanya, kami bukan sahaja akan memberi anda 14 tahun, tetapi jika kami mengubah fikiran kami esok, dan berfikir bahawa lebih baik , tempoh yang lebih lama adalah perlu, kami -- ini adalah konsisten, tetapi ini juga soal keadilan, dan ia --


Premise: Yeah, no question about that, but there also needs to be strong enforcement of the law. Some kid who feels like -- doesn't matter where the gun comes from, it could be a cheap gun, expensive gun. What matters is something in this person's head says there is not going to be a consequence.

Hypothesis: gun laws are enforced too heavily

it is not known, this is a subjective opinion

Ya, tiada persoalan tentang itu, tetapi juga perlu ada penguatkuasaan undang-undang yang kuat. Sesetengah kanak-kanak yang berasa seperti -- tidak kira dari mana pistol itu datang, ia boleh menjadi pistol murah, pistol mahal. Apa yang penting adalah sesuatu dalam kepala orang ini mengatakan tidak akan ada akibatnya.

undang-undang senjata api dikuatkuasakan terlalu berat


Premise: There were a couple instances where friends of mine had tried to check on the status of the books in the library but were not permitted to go in at that time. So I am only assuming that those books are there now because I am being told that they are. But as for myself walking into a library and seeing them there, I did not.

Hypothesis: The books were always in the library.

It is not known if they were there or not because the friends weren't allowed in and he couldn't be for sure if they were or not. The system doesn't know because the information wasn't given.

Terdapat beberapa contoh di mana rakan saya telah cuba menyemak status buku di perpustakaan tetapi tidak dibenarkan masuk pada masa itu. Jadi saya hanya mengandaikan bahawa buku-buku itu ada sekarang kerana saya diberitahu bahawa ia ada. Tetapi untuk diri saya sendiri berjalan ke perpustakaan dan melihat mereka di sana, saya tidak.

Buku-buku itu sentiasa ada di perpustakaan.


Premise: I hope the minister will not forget that, if there ever was a government on this earth that has worked, that has recognized aboriginal governments, and that has paid tribute to, made things easier for and given space to aboriginal communities, to the first nations, because they are nations, it is the Government of Quebec that did it, as early as 1985.

Hypothesis: This statement is by a politician.

Saya harap menteri tidak akan lupa bahawa, jika ada kerajaan di bumi ini yang telah bekerja, yang telah mengiktiraf kerajaan orang asli, dan yang telah memberi penghormatan kepada, memudahkan dan memberi ruang kepada masyarakat orang asli, kepada negara-negara pertama. , kerana mereka adalah negara, Kerajaan Quebec yang melakukannya, seawal tahun 1985.

Kenyataan ini oleh seorang ahli politik.


Premise: He voted to violate the budget cap 277 times. You know, there's a main stream in American politics and you sit right on the far left bank. As a matter of fact, your record is such that Ted Kennedy, your colleague, is the conservative senator from Massachusetts.

Hypothesis: The person being discussed is a democrat.

The person being a democrat is possible with the comment about the left bank, but they might just be a liberal republican.

Beliau mengundi untuk melanggar had bajet sebanyak 277 kali. Anda tahu, terdapat aliran utama dalam politik Amerika dan anda duduk betul-betul di tebing paling kiri. Sebenarnya, rekod anda ialah Ted Kennedy, rakan sekerja anda, adalah senator konservatif dari Massachusetts.

Orang yang dibincangkan adalah seorang demokrat.


Premise: By the way, they are going to build this fund and they are going to have some Liberal hacks running it unaccountable because there are clauses in here which, if they do not get changed, will make sure that the investment board of the Canada pension plan is not accountable to Parliament.

Hypothesis: this person reports directly to parliament

it is not clear what agency or legal body this individual works for

Ngomong-ngomong, mereka akan membina dana ini dan mereka akan mempunyai beberapa penggodaman Liberal menjalankannya tidak boleh dipertanggungjawabkan kerana terdapat klausa di sini yang, jika mereka tidak diubah, akan memastikan bahawa lembaga pelaburan pelan pencen Kanada tidak bertanggungjawab kepada Parlimen.


Premise: (2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and, shall within five yeas after the review is undertaken, submit a report to the House of Commons.''

Hypothesis: The House of Commons had not been created as of 1799.

Nothing in the text suggests when it was created, so we don't know for sure. It's difficult because the system has a lot of trouble dealing with statements about existence for some reason.

(2) Jawatankuasa yang ditetapkan atau ditubuhkan bagi maksud subseksyen (1) hendaklah, dengan seberapa segera yang dapat dilaksanakan, menjalankan kajian semula menyeluruh mengenai peruntukan dan kuat kuasa Akta ini dan, hendaklah dalam tempoh lima tahun selepas kajian semula itu dijalankan, mengemukakan laporan. kepada Dewan Rakyat.''

Dewan Rakyat belum diwujudkan pada 1799.


Premise: I agree with that, and I did support that law. But I think that we should find a way to allow some kind of civic unions, and I basically agree with Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman. And I think the three of us have one view and the Governor has another view.

Hypothesis: The speaker is John Kerry.

Given the context I think it's likely that the speaker is John Kerry but it's not possible to definitely determine by just the quote.

Saya bersetuju dengan itu, dan saya menyokong undang-undang itu. Tetapi saya fikir kita harus mencari jalan untuk membenarkan beberapa jenis kesatuan sivik, dan saya pada dasarnya bersetuju dengan Dick Cheney dan Joe Lieberman. Dan saya rasa kami bertiga mempunyai satu pandangan dan Gabenor mempunyai pandangan lain.


Premise: That's not smart. I don't want American workers subsidizing the loss of their own job. And when I'm president, we're going to shut that loophole in a nanosecond and we're going to use that money to lower corporate tax rates in America for all corporations, 5 percent. And we're going to have a manufacturing jobs credit and a job hiring credit so we actually help people be able to hire here.

Hypothesis: The president shut down the loophole in a nanosecond

It is neither because the prompt is only talking about what he wants to do when he is president. He is talking about what he wants to do. THe system confuses the future sense

Itu tidak bijak. Saya tidak mahu pekerja Amerika memberi subsidi kehilangan pekerjaan mereka sendiri. Dan apabila saya menjadi presiden, kami akan menutup kelemahan itu dalam satu nanosaat dan kami akan menggunakan wang itu untuk menurunkan kadar cukai korporat di Amerika untuk semua syarikat, 5 peratus. Dan kami akan mempunyai kredit pekerjaan pembuatan dan kredit pengambilan kerja supaya kami benar-benar membantu orang ramai untuk mengupah di sini.


Premise: The Harper as well as Graham set out very clear limits on the context of the ability to extend works in the public domain. Those limits make no sense under the reasoning the Government has offered. The Government's reasoning would make all of those opinions irrelevant and wrong.

Hypothesis: The Government is right.

The Harper serta Graham menetapkan had yang sangat jelas pada konteks keupayaan untuk melanjutkan karya dalam domain awam. Had tersebut tidak masuk akal di bawah alasan yang ditawarkan oleh Kerajaan. Alasan Kerajaan akan menjadikan semua pendapat itu tidak relevan dan salah.


Premise: I believe that younger workers ought to be allowed to take some of their own money and put it in a personal savings account, because I understand that they need to get better rates of return than the rates of return being given in the current Social Security trust.

Hypothesis: All younger workers have a personal savings account

It's not know if ALL young workers have a personal savings account

Saya percaya bahawa pekerja yang lebih muda sepatutnya dibenarkan mengambil sedikit wang mereka sendiri dan memasukkannya ke dalam akaun simpanan peribadi, kerana saya faham bahawa mereka perlu mendapatkan kadar pulangan yang lebih baik daripada kadar pulangan yang diberikan dalam amanah Keselamatan Sosial semasa .

Semua pekerja muda mempunyai akaun simpanan peribadi


Premise: I understand those things could come up in the course of the deposition, and I'll rule on those as I can if I'm not instantly available. So whether I'm sitting at trial or not -- and likely it will be a day when I'm sitting in trial -- we'll deal with it.

Hypothesis: They'll deal with it when they are sitting in trial.

The statement said that they'd likely deal with it while sitting on trial, that does not mean that that's when it'll happen for sure.

Saya faham perkara itu boleh timbul semasa pemendapan, dan saya akan memutuskan perkara itu mengikut kemampuan saya jika saya tidak tersedia serta-merta. Jadi sama ada saya sedang duduk dalam perbicaraan atau tidak -- dan berkemungkinan ia akan menjadi hari apabila saya sedang duduk dalam perbicaraan -- kami akan menanganinya.

Mereka akan menanganinya apabila mereka sedang duduk dalam perbicaraan.


Premise: Now, I don't have time to preside over a deposition at this late date. And I know that you respect that. You're experienced counsel and you know that. I do know from my private practice experience that I was extremely loathed to get a judge on the telephone in mid-deposition. That could be one of the most unhappy experiences that a lawyer would have.

Hypothesis: The granddaughter has never been to boston

Its states that she came to boston last weekend so she has been there. the system go it wrong becuase it believed that the passage might have been from the present

Sekarang, saya tidak mempunyai masa untuk mempengerusikan deposisi pada tarikh lewat ini. Dan saya tahu anda menghormatinya. Anda seorang penasihat yang berpengalaman dan anda tahu itu. Saya tahu dari pengalaman latihan peribadi saya bahawa saya amat benci untuk mendapatkan hakim melalui telefon pada pertengahan pemendapan. Itu boleh menjadi salah satu pengalaman paling tidak menggembirakan yang akan dialami oleh seorang peguam.


Premise: And I've done that. Over 20 years in the United States Senate, I've worked with John McCain, who's sitting here, I've worked with other colleagues. I've reached across the aisle. I've tried to find the common ground, because that's what makes us strong as Americans.

Hypothesis: The other colleagues worked with John McCain.

My statement is indeed neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect because it doesn't't say whether others worked with John McCain. It only states I did.

Dan saya telah melakukannya. Lebih 20 tahun di Senat Amerika Syarikat, saya telah bekerja dengan John McCain, yang duduk di sini, saya telah bekerja dengan rakan sekerja yang lain. Saya telah sampai ke seberang lorong. Saya telah cuba mencari titik persamaan, kerana itulah yang menjadikan kita kuat sebagai rakyat Amerika.

Rakan sekerja yang lain bekerja dengan John McCain.


Premise: In other words, you say to a youngster, it will be in your financial interest to start saving for future illness, but for the working folks that do want to have health care that can't afford it, a couple of things we need to do. One, we need more community health centers.

Hypothesis: there are many community health centers.

Dalam erti kata lain, anda berkata kepada seorang anak muda, ia akan menjadi kepentingan kewangan anda untuk mula menyimpan untuk penyakit masa depan, tetapi bagi mereka yang bekerja yang ingin mendapatkan penjagaan kesihatan yang tidak mampu, beberapa perkara yang perlu kita lakukan. buat. Satu, kita memerlukan lebih banyak pusat kesihatan masyarakat.

terdapat banyak pusat kesihatan masyarakat.


Premise: Your committee, which was authorized by the Senate on Tuesday, November 25, 1997, to examine and report upon all matters relating to the future of the Canadian War Museum, including, but not restricted to, its structure, budget, name and independence, respectfully requests that it be empowered to engage the services of such counsel and technical, clerical and other personnel as may be necessary for the purpose of its examination.

Hypothesis: The committee meets weekly to dance

There is no dancing involved in the context therefore it is neither definitely correct or incorrect that the committee meets weekly to dance.

Jawatankuasa anda, yang diberi kuasa oleh Senat pada hari Selasa, 25 November 1997, untuk memeriksa dan melaporkan semua perkara yang berkaitan dengan masa depan Muzium Perang Kanada, termasuk, tetapi tidak terhad kepada, struktur, belanjawan, nama dan kemerdekaannya, dengan hormatnya memohon agar ia diberi kuasa untuk mendapatkan khidmat peguam dan kakitangan teknikal, perkeranian dan lain-lain yang mungkin perlu bagi tujuan pemeriksaannya.

Jawatankuasa bermesyuarat mingguan untuk menari


Premise: And the "Los Angeles Times" spent a lot of ink going into that. But I am not for doing anything that would affect hunters or sportsmen, rifles, shotguns, existing handguns. I do think that sensible gun safety measures are warranted now. Look, this is the year -- this is in the aftermath of Columbine, and Paducah, and all the places in our country where the nation has been shocked by these weapons in the hands of the wrong people.

Hypothesis: The LA Times is pro gun.

I believe this statement is neither correct or incorrect because it doesn't say if they are pro-gun or against guns. They say they just think there should be more gun safety measures.

Dan "Los Angeles Times" menghabiskan banyak dakwat untuk membahasnya. Tetapi saya bukan untuk melakukan apa-apa yang akan menjejaskan pemburu atau ahli sukan, senapang, senapang patah, pistol sedia ada. Saya fikir bahawa langkah keselamatan senjata api yang wajar adalah wajar sekarang. Lihat, ini adalah tahun -- ini adalah selepas Columbine, dan Paducah, dan semua tempat di negara kita di mana negara telah dikejutkan dengan senjata ini di tangan orang yang salah.


Premise: We travelled throughout Alberta to examine areas within our education system that we found to be discriminatory, inappropriate or racist, and to look into ways and means by which we could improve our education system to overcome the intolerance and lack of understanding that seemed to prevail in many areas of our province.

Hypothesis: We really liked clubbing in Alberta.

Kami mengembara ke seluruh Alberta untuk memeriksa kawasan dalam sistem pendidikan kami yang kami dapati sebagai diskriminasi, tidak sesuai atau perkauman, dan untuk melihat cara dan cara yang boleh kami perbaiki sistem pendidikan kami untuk mengatasi sikap tidak bertolak ansur dan kekurangan persefahaman yang kelihatan berlaku dalam banyak kawasan di wilayah kami.


Premise: In other words, like it was not the current finance minister, like it was not the current prime minister, like it was not even the former revenue minister who now sits as the fisheries minister, like it was not these people of the government in the 35th and 36th parliaments who actually brought in the legislation.

Hypothesis: The 34th parliament brought the legislation.

We are not certain who brought the legislation, it could have been the 34th parliament or the 37th parliament, one is not certain based on the context of the prompt.

Dalam erti kata lain, seperti bukan menteri kewangan sekarang, seperti bukan perdana menteri sekarang, seperti bukan juga bekas menteri hasil yang kini duduk sebagai menteri perikanan, seperti bukan orang-orang kerajaan ini dalam Parlimen ke-35 dan ke-36 yang sebenarnya membawa perundangan.


Premise: And the budget plan that I've put out, according to the "Los Angeles Times" again, the way these things are typically measured as a percentage of the GDP, will bring government spending down to the lowest level in 50 years. So I want to proceed carefully to cover more people.

Hypothesis: The government spending budget is the best choice for the Los Angeles Times.

The Los Angeles Times says the plan will cause the lowest level in 50 years, which is positive, but doesn't necessarily meant they think it's the best, but also doesn't mean they don't think it isn't the best option. The agent had a hard choice deciding if it was neither or incorrect because of the wording.

Dan pelan belanjawan yang telah saya keluarkan, menurut "Los Angeles Times" sekali lagi, cara perkara ini biasanya diukur sebagai peratusan daripada KDNK, akan membawa perbelanjaan kerajaan turun ke tahap terendah dalam 50 tahun. Jadi saya ingin meneruskan dengan berhati-hati untuk meliputi lebih ramai orang.

Bajet perbelanjaan kerajaan adalah pilihan terbaik untuk Los Angeles Times.


Premise: Does the Minister of Canadian Heritage really think that increasing the tax write-off to 100% for corporate boxes, lowering the taxes sports millionaires pay to American levels, and writing off professional sports facilities in one year, which will cost hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tax revenues, will fly with Canadian taxpayers?

Hypothesis: Increasing tax write-off for corporate boxes is the sole role of the Minister of Canadian Heritage.

It could be his sole role, or not, the agent marks as incorrect, however, that doesn't state that it is.

Adakah Menteri Warisan Kanada benar-benar berfikir bahawa meningkatkan hapus kira cukai kepada 100% untuk kotak korporat, menurunkan cukai yang dibayar jutawan sukan ke peringkat Amerika, dan menghapuskan kemudahan sukan profesional dalam satu tahun, yang akan menelan belanja ratusan juta dolar dalam hasil cukai yang hilang, adakah akan terbang bersama pembayar cukai Kanada?

Meningkatkan hapus kira cukai untuk kotak korporat adalah peranan tunggal Menteri Warisan Kanada.


Premise: Hon. Joyce Fairbairn , Joint Chair of the Special Joint Committee on the Amendment to Term 17 of the Terms of Union of Newfoundland, informed the Senate that, pursuant to the Senate's order of reference of November 5, she had deposited with the Clerk on Friday, December 5, 1997, the final report of the Special Joint Committee.

Hypothesis: Joyce Fairbairn was born before December 5, 1980.

The statement is in the correct category because the excerpt does not say when Joyce was born. The system may have been confused by the other dates given in the excerpt.

Yang Berhormat Joyce Fairbairn , Pengerusi Bersama Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas mengenai Pindaan kepada Penggal 17 Syarat Kesatuan Newfoundland, memaklumkan Senat bahawa, menurut perintah rujukan Senat pada 5 November, dia telah mendepositkan dengan Kerani pada hari Jumaat, Disember 5, 1997, laporan akhir Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas.

Joyce Fairbairn dilahirkan sebelum 5 Disember 1980.


Premise: Instead, I am raising this question of privilege on the grounds that this attack on Ms Copps is clearly a means to obstruct a member of Parliament of either house in the discharge of their duties, whether the duties are met in the other place or whether the duties are met in this place.

Hypothesis: Ms Copps is attempting to obstruct the Prime Minister.

The prompt states that Ms Copps is attempting to obstruct a member of Parliament, this may mean the PM as well.

Sebaliknya, saya membangkitkan persoalan keistimewaan ini atas alasan bahawa serangan ke atas Cik Copps ini jelas merupakan cara untuk menghalang ahli Parlimen mana-mana dewan dalam menjalankan tugas mereka, sama ada tugas itu dipenuhi di tempat lain atau sama ada tugas dipenuhi di tempat ini.

Cik Copps cuba menghalang Perdana Menteri.


Premise: Biotechnology, in Montreal essentially, was established with the assistance, the indefeasible support of the Canadian government and of my colleague in industry, especially through the creation of the biotechnology research institute, which gave a lift to biotechnology in Montreal.

Hypothesis: Biotechnology is a large industry in the United States.

We don't know because this segment is only talking about biotechnology in Montreal. It's difficult because the text mentions Canada, so the system assumes the statement must be incorrect I guess.

Bioteknologi, di Montreal pada asasnya, telah ditubuhkan dengan bantuan, sokongan yang tidak dapat disangkal daripada kerajaan Kanada dan rakan sekerja saya dalam industri, terutamanya melalui penciptaan institut penyelidikan bioteknologi, yang memberikan peningkatan kepada bioteknologi di Montreal.

Bioteknologi adalah industri besar di Amerika Syarikat.


Premise: Leading the movement which has always been more in evidence in all classes of Quebec society, the Pro-Dmocratie group makes a point of condemning the initiative of the federal government in the following terms: ``We share the conviction that the constitutional debate is first of all a political debate and that it should be resolved by political means.

Hypothesis: The Pro-Dmocratie group's views are shared with all classes of Quebec society.

The "Pro-Dmocratie" group was only described as being "leading" and "always more" in evidence of all classes. However this statement, I think, says that "all" classes share the views. That would, basically, mean that all political groups in Quebec society share the views of the "Pro-Dmocratie" group which is uncertain.

Mengetuai gerakan yang sentiasa menjadi bukti dalam semua kelas masyarakat Quebec, kumpulan Pro-Dmocratie mengutuk inisiatif kerajaan persekutuan dalam terma berikut: ``Kami berkongsi keyakinan bahawa perbahasan perlembagaan adalah yang pertama. semua perdebatan politik dan ia harus diselesaikan dengan cara politik.

Pandangan kumpulan Pro-Dmocratie dikongsi dengan semua kelas masyarakat Quebec.


Premise: Okay. And so if you don't believe everything in the newspapers, don't you think before you became a plaintiff in a lawsuit that you should have taken some personal action to verify whether things that were produced in a newspaper were really accurate?

Hypothesis: No personal action was actually needed.

No personal action was needed, it was done through his secretary and done automatically online.

Baik. Oleh itu, jika anda tidak mempercayai segala-galanya dalam akhbar, tidakkah anda fikir sebelum anda menjadi plaintif dalam tuntutan mahkamah bahawa anda sepatutnya mengambil beberapa tindakan peribadi untuk mengesahkan sama ada perkara yang dikeluarkan dalam akhbar itu benar-benar tepat?

Tiada tindakan peribadi sebenarnya diperlukan.


Premise: And we're not doing what we ought to do in terms of the technology. We have iris-identification technology. We have thumbprint, fingerprint technology today. We can know who the people are, that they're really the people they say they are when they cross the border.

Hypothesis: The government has dna identification technology.

He hasn't explicitly said that we DO have this technology, but he hasn't explicitly said that we don't either.

Dan kami tidak melakukan apa yang sepatutnya kami lakukan dari segi teknologi. Kami mempunyai teknologi pengenalan iris. Kami mempunyai cap ibu jari, teknologi cap jari hari ini. Kita boleh tahu siapa orang itu, bahawa mereka benar-benar orang yang mereka katakan apabila mereka melintasi sempadan.

Kerajaan mempunyai teknologi pengenalan DNA.


Premise: Your Honor, as you know, we've got the question of whether or not these are admissible for effect. Our position on that we've articulated. I don't know if you want us to argue at greater length or brief, but it's hearsay to the extent it's offered for the truth of the matter asserted as effect.

Hypothesis: Nothing is admissible for effect at this moment.

They have the question of weather or not a specific thing is admissible for effect, however it is not completely incorrect that nothing is admissible at this time.

Yang Berhormat, seperti yang anda tahu, kami mempunyai persoalan sama ada ini boleh diterima berkuat kuasa atau tidak. Pendirian kami mengenai perkara yang telah kami nyatakan. Saya tidak tahu sama ada anda mahu kami berhujah lebih panjang atau ringkas, tetapi ia adalah khabar angin sejauh mana ia ditawarkan untuk kebenaran perkara yang ditegaskan sebagai kesan.

Tiada apa-apa yang boleh diterima untuk kesan pada masa ini.


Premise: As this Court explained 100 and some years ago in its Burrows-Giles opinion, such constructions are accorded very great weight and, as that Court went on to say, when consistent and unchallenged for over a century are almost conclusive that consistent construction by Congress of its authority under the Copyright and Patent Clause now has lasted from the 105th -- from the first through the 105th Congress.

Hypothesis: The Burrows-Giles opinion is the only construction.

I put that "The Burrows-Giles opinion is not the ONLY construction," when it lists that "such constructions," implying more than one.

Seperti yang dijelaskan oleh Mahkamah ini 100 dan beberapa tahun yang lalu dalam pendapat Burrows-Gilesnya, pembinaan sedemikian diberi berat yang sangat besar dan, seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Mahkamah itu, apabila konsisten dan tidak dicabar selama lebih satu abad adalah hampir muktamad bahawa pembinaan yang konsisten oleh Kongres kuasanya di bawah Klausa Hak Cipta dan Paten kini telah berlangsung dari 105 -- dari yang pertama hingga Kongres ke-105.

Pendapat Burrows-Giles adalah satu-satunya pembinaan.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, yesterday I wrote to the prime minister asking him whether his government would not see it appropriate to extend to the end of the month of January 1998 the period for charitable donations, to allow all charities in Canada a chance to solicit funds for the cause they defend given the postal strike we have just experienced.

Hypothesis: Canadian charities will be allowed to solicit funds through the month of January.

The text states the Prime Minister is being asked to extend the deadline through January. It doesn't state whether the request is granted.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, semalam saya menulis kepada perdana menteri bertanyakan kepadanya sama ada kerajaannya tidak akan melihat wajar untuk melanjutkan sehingga akhir bulan Januari 1998 tempoh derma amal, untuk memberi peluang kepada semua badan amal di Kanada untuk mendapatkan dana bagi punca yang mereka pertahankan memandangkan mogok pos yang baru kita alami.

Badan amal Kanada akan dibenarkan untuk mendapatkan dana sepanjang bulan Januari.


Premise: It's certainly the case that we are asserting, in light of the changed circumstances, that the opportunity to build upon works within the public domain is a fundamental First Amendment interest, and that the First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case, is that the public domain be permitted as a source for cultivating work about our culture without unnecessary legal restriction.

Hypothesis: First Amendment values, vital speech interest at stake of this case is our goal

Sememangnya, kami menegaskan, berdasarkan keadaan yang berubah, bahawa peluang untuk membina kerja dalam domain awam adalah kepentingan Pindaan Pertama yang asas, dan nilai Pindaan Pertama, kepentingan ucapan penting yang dipertaruhkan dalam kes ini, ialah domain awam dibenarkan sebagai sumber untuk memupuk karya tentang budaya kita tanpa sekatan undang-undang yang tidak perlu.

Nilai Pindaan Pertama, minat ucapan penting yang dipertaruhkan dalam kes ini adalah matlamat kami


Premise: He consults with his own legal counsel and he is told if he says yes, there is a problem because he will be perceived to have taken a position that is intimidating the employees and therefore that position will be used to justify certifying a union even when less than the majority of the employees support doing so.

Hypothesis: If he says no, there will be a problem.

There may be, but the quote says nothing about it

Dia berunding dengan peguamnya sendiri dan dia diberitahu jika dia berkata ya, ada masalah kerana dia akan dianggap telah mengambil jawatan yang menakutkan pekerja dan oleh itu jawatan itu akan digunakan untuk mewajarkan perakuan kesatuan walaupun kurang. daripada majoriti pekerja menyokong berbuat demikian.

Jika dia berkata tidak, akan ada masalah.


Premise: To allay Mr. Benn's concerns, I think it is not fair game to talk about all the other things that they heard and why they wrote the article the way they did and why they excluded quotes. I sincerely believe that that gets into journalistic integrity, and that's problematic, and it's not my intent to allow that, nor would I allow any questioning on anything personal to the reporters. I think I spelled that out in detail in the prior orders.

Hypothesis: Mr. Benn has raised concerns prior to these ones.

We only know from the context that Mr. Benn raised these specific concerns, we do not know if he raised any concerns before this, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Untuk meredakan kebimbangan En. Benn, saya fikir bukan permainan yang adil untuk bercakap tentang semua perkara lain yang mereka dengar dan mengapa mereka menulis artikel itu seperti yang mereka lakukan dan mengapa mereka mengecualikan petikan. Saya benar-benar percaya bahawa perkara itu melibatkan integriti kewartawanan, dan itu bermasalah, dan bukan niat saya untuk membenarkannya, dan saya juga tidak akan membenarkan sebarang pertanyaan mengenai perkara peribadi kepada wartawan. Saya rasa saya telah menyatakannya secara terperinci dalam pesanan sebelumnya.

Encik Benn telah mengemukakan kebimbangan sebelum ini.


Premise: But I thought you were saying that if you accept the Copyright Clause argument, then you have a way, in effect, of devaluing the Government's claim of its important interest and important objective when you get to the First Amendment intermediate scrutiny analysis.

Hypothesis: The First Amendment doesn't have anything to do with copyright clause.

This is neither correct or incorrect as the first amendment deals with the freedom of speech and press but doesnt make a connection with the clause.

Tetapi saya fikir anda mengatakan bahawa jika anda menerima hujah Klausa Hak Cipta, maka anda mempunyai cara, sebenarnya, untuk menurunkan nilai dakwaan Kerajaan tentang kepentingan penting dan objektif pentingnya apabila anda sampai ke analisis penelitian pertengahan Pindaan Pertama.

Pindaan Pertama tidak mempunyai kaitan dengan klausa hak cipta.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, to answer the member's first point about lower unemployment, the Minister of Finance in budget plan 1999 on page 64 projects that employment insurance benefit payments will rise from $11.8 billion to $13.8 billion by 2000-01, an extra $2 billion for employment insurance payments.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker needs a hug.

It is unclear if Mr. Speaker needs a hug. The system was confused by the context.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, untuk menjawab perkara pertama ahli mengenai kadar pengangguran yang lebih rendah, Menteri Kewangan dalam rancangan belanjawan 1999 di muka surat 64 memproyeksikan bahawa bayaran faedah insurans pekerjaan akan meningkat daripada $11.8 bilion kepada $13.8 bilion menjelang 2000-01, tambahan $2 bilion untuk pekerjaan. bayaran insurans.


Premise: Since the beginning of this parliament, every time they were given the opportunity, the members of the Bloc Quebecois-at least those who sit on the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade-have asked the government to be more transparent on this issue, by agreeing to table before parliament not only treaties like the ones dealing with extradition and social security, but all treaties.

Hypothesis: Parliament writes their treaties with hemp paper.

Sejak awal parlimen ini, setiap kali mereka diberi peluang, ahli-ahli Blok Quebecois-sekurang-kurangnya mereka yang menganggotai Jawatankuasa Tetap Hal Ehwal Luar Negeri dan Perdagangan Antarabangsa-telah meminta kerajaan lebih telus dalam isu ini, dengan bersetuju untuk membentangkan di hadapan parlimen bukan sahaja perjanjian seperti yang berkaitan dengan ekstradisi dan keselamatan sosial, tetapi semua perjanjian.

Parlimen menulis perjanjian mereka dengan kertas rami.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, an internal audit done in 1997 by Consulting and Audit Canada has confirmed what the Bloc Quebecois' analysis clearly showed- political pressure was brought to bear on the administrative staff of Human Resources Development Canada in order to speed up the grant approval process.

Hypothesis: The grant approval process wasn't able to speed up because of the political pressure.

It states that the political pressure was introduced, but it does not state if it was successful or unsuccessful in actually changing the grant approval time frame.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, audit dalaman yang dilakukan pada tahun 1997 oleh Perunding dan Audit Kanada telah mengesahkan apa yang jelas ditunjukkan oleh analisis Blok Quebecois- tekanan politik telah dibawa ke atas kakitangan pentadbiran Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Kanada untuk mempercepatkan proses kelulusan geran .

Proses kelulusan geran tidak dapat dipercepatkan kerana tekanan politik.


Premise: The book you mentioned that Vice President Gore wrote, he also called for taxing -- big energy taxes in order to clean up the environment. And now that the energy prices are high, I guess he's not advocating those big energy taxes right now. I believe we ought to fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund to -- with half the money going to states so states can make the right decisions for environmental quality.

Hypothesis: Vice President Gore will be terrible.

Because it does not say if Vice President Gore ideas or himself are either good or terrible.

Buku yang anda sebutkan yang ditulis oleh Naib Presiden Gore, beliau juga meminta cukai -- cukai tenaga yang besar untuk membersihkan alam sekitar. Dan sekarang dengan harga tenaga yang tinggi, saya rasa dia tidak menyokong cukai tenaga yang besar itu sekarang. Saya percaya kita harus membiayai sepenuhnya Dana Pemuliharaan Tanah dan Air untuk -- dengan separuh daripada wang itu disalurkan kepada negeri supaya negeri boleh membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk kualiti alam sekitar.

Naib Presiden Gore akan menjadi mengerikan.


Premise: You know, in the last, or two decades ago it was routine for leaders of foreign countries to come over here and say you guys have got to do something about these horrendous deficits because it's causing tremendous problems for the rest of the world, and we were lectured to all the time.

Hypothesis: Everyone agrees that we have got to do something about these horrendous deficits.

it isn't mentions whether everyone agrees or not so its neither but the AI did not recognized the wording so marked it incorrect.

Anda tahu, sejak dua dekad yang lalu, sudah menjadi rutin bagi pemimpin negara asing untuk datang ke sini dan mengatakan bahawa anda perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang defisit yang teruk ini kerana ia menyebabkan masalah besar bagi seluruh dunia, dan kami diberi syarahan sepanjang masa.

Semua orang bersetuju bahawa kita perlu melakukan sesuatu tentang defisit yang dahsyat ini.


Premise: But it is hard to understand how, if the overall purpose of the Copyright Clause is to encourage creative work, how some retroactive extension could possibly do that. I -- one wonders what was in the principle 13 difficult principle given to Congress and has been exercised so repeatedly out there that would ever kick in?

Hypothesis: the Copyright Clause is only valid in canada

it does not state where the Copyright Clause is valid. It could be anywhere

Tetapi sukar untuk memahami bagaimana, jika tujuan keseluruhan Klausa Hak Cipta adalah untuk menggalakkan kerja kreatif, bagaimana sesetengah sambungan retroaktif boleh melakukannya. Saya -- seseorang tertanya-tanya apakah dalam prinsip 13 prinsip sukar yang diberikan kepada Kongres dan telah dilaksanakan berkali-kali di luar sana yang mungkin akan berlaku?


Premise: And it's the right cause. It's the right decision. Secondly, there is other forms of racial profiling that goes on in America. Arab-Americans are racially profiled in what is called secret evidence. People are stopped, and we have to do something about that.

Hypothesis: Arab-Americans are pulled over by police because of their ethnicity.

Dan ia adalah punca yang betul. Ia adalah keputusan yang tepat. Kedua, terdapat bentuk profil kaum lain yang berlaku di Amerika. Arab-Amerika berprofil perkauman dalam apa yang dipanggil bukti rahsia. Orang ramai dihentikan, dan kita perlu melakukan sesuatu mengenainya.

Orang Arab-Amerika ditarik balik oleh polis kerana etnik mereka.


Premise: Well, there was -- at this point in time it was the change in the curriculum that was being proposed and voted on that evening. And, again, this was a heated meeting. There were many members of the community who stood to speak, science department members. Jen Miller spoke, although I didn't really know who she was at the time. I recall her speaking on behalf of her biology course. I recall Bertha Spahr again speaking. My husband again spoke at this meeting. And, again, other members of the community spoke at that meeting.

Hypothesis: This is a PTA meeting

It is not clear what type of meeting it is

Nah, ada -- pada masa ini perubahan dalam kurikulum yang dicadangkan dan diundi pada petang itu. Dan, sekali lagi, ini adalah pertemuan yang hangat. Terdapat ramai ahli masyarakat yang berdiri untuk berucap, ahli jabatan sains. Jen Miller bercakap, walaupun saya tidak tahu siapa dia pada masa itu. Saya masih ingat dia bercakap bagi pihak kursus biologinya. Saya ingat lagi Bertha Spahr bercakap. Suami saya sekali lagi bercakap pada mesyuarat ini. Dan, sekali lagi, ahli komuniti lain bercakap pada mesyuarat itu.


Premise: It is -- well, it -- let me say with respond -- in response to both of those questions, an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause. Something that was the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, but the Framers specifically did not put in numbers.

Hypothesis: Someone has a clear idea of what the time is for violating the copyright clause.

The whole thing doesn't really make sense so I figured this would work- like who knows what they were up to.

Ia adalah -- baiklah -- biar saya katakan dengan jawapan -- sebagai jawapan kepada kedua-dua soalan tersebut, masa tanpa had akan melanggar Klausa Hak Cipta. Sesuatu yang setara dengan fungsi masa tanpa had akan melanggar Klausa Hak Cipta, tetapi Penggubal secara khusus tidak memasukkan nombor.

Seseorang mempunyai idea yang jelas tentang masa untuk melanggar klausa hak cipta.


Premise: This morning, the Minister of Immigration told me that 248 confirmed refugees were on their way to Canada - mostly women, children and grandparents - and she also said that 19 of those who had been chosen to be among the first to come had actually declined the invitation, having decided to stay close to their home.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Immigration introduces himself to refugee grandparents.

The Minister of Immigration may or may not chose to meet refugees who are grandparents. There is nothing prohibiting him, nor is there anything mandating him to meet.

Pagi ini, Menteri Imigresen memberitahu saya bahawa 248 pelarian yang disahkan sedang dalam perjalanan ke Kanada - kebanyakannya wanita, kanak-kanak dan datuk nenek - dan dia juga berkata bahawa 19 daripada mereka yang telah dipilih untuk menjadi antara yang pertama datang sebenarnya telah menolak jemputan, setelah memutuskan untuk tinggal dekat dengan rumah mereka.

Menteri Imigresen memperkenalkan diri kepada datuk nenek pelarian.


Premise: As much as I know about the scientific community -- and, you know, you have to remember that's not my discipline. But as much as I know about what the high school science standards say, it would be in standing with that. As far as the scientific community, I really can't go there, because I know that there is a lot more about Darwin than is in that textbook. I mean, I can absolutely say that without knowing everything about Darwin or knowing everything about science.

Hypothesis: the writer is more knowledgeable about Darwin than  what is portrayed by the textbook

the writer never claimed to be more knowledgeable than what is presented in the text book, only claimed book did not capture some facts

Setakat yang saya tahu tentang komuniti saintifik -- dan, anda tahu, anda perlu ingat itu bukan disiplin saya. Tetapi seberapa banyak yang saya tahu tentang apa yang dikatakan oleh piawaian sains sekolah tinggi, ia adalah selaras dengan itu. Setakat komuniti saintifik, saya benar-benar tidak boleh pergi ke sana, kerana saya tahu bahawa terdapat banyak lagi tentang Darwin daripada dalam buku teks itu. Maksud saya, saya benar-benar boleh mengatakan bahawa tanpa mengetahui segala-galanya tentang Darwin atau mengetahui segala-galanya tentang sains.

penulis lebih mengetahui tentang Darwin daripada apa yang digambarkan oleh buku teks


Premise: He came to care about the Senate, but he has deep concerns about its viability in its present form, concerns which he expressed in a very fine speech in February of 1998. He challenged all of us to work together constructively for change, both constitutional change and internal change.

Hypothesis: Internal change is welcomed by everyone.

I made a generalization. This is what made it difficult.

Dia mengambil berat tentang Senat, tetapi dia mempunyai kebimbangan mendalam tentang daya majunya dalam bentuknya sekarang, kebimbangan yang dia nyatakan dalam ucapan yang sangat baik pada Februari 1998. Dia mencabar kita semua untuk bekerjasama secara membina untuk perubahan, kedua-dua perubahan perlembagaan dan perubahan dalaman.

Perubahan dalaman dialu-alukan oleh semua orang.


Premise: I mean, it's a penny on 1,000, or probably a lot less than that, frankly. So I can not only not imagine a person whose decision to write would be governed by such a thing, I cannot imagine a European who would come to America to copyright his work for such a reason.

Hypothesis: I am against Europeans coming to American to copyright their work

I can't imagine it, but it doesn't mean I'm against it

Maksud saya, ia adalah satu sen pada 1,000, atau mungkin jauh lebih rendah daripada itu, terus terang. Jadi saya bukan sahaja tidak dapat membayangkan seseorang yang keputusannya untuk menulis akan ditadbir oleh perkara sedemikian, saya tidak dapat membayangkan orang Eropah yang akan datang ke Amerika untuk hak cipta karyanya atas sebab sedemikian.

Saya menentang orang Eropah yang datang ke Amerika untuk hak cipta karya mereka


Premise: By our order of last Thursday -- the date escapes me, I think it was Thursday -- the Court denied relief in that matter. The Court was advised that yesterday, on September the 27th, the reporters, both of them, showed up at the appointed times for their depositions as appropriately scheduled by the defendants, and I'm advised -- and I'll correct this if I'm wrong -- that both reporters cited the reporter's privilege that they consider to exist under the First Amendment so that they would not answer any questions at those depositions.

Hypothesis: The time of this statement is the 20th century

It could be the 20th century. It might be the 21st century. It isn't written like it can be any other century, but which of the two it could be, it is not known. It could be either.

Dengan perintah kami pada Khamis lalu -- tarikh itu terlepas daripada saya, saya fikir ia adalah Khamis -- Mahkamah menafikan pelepasan dalam perkara itu. Mahkamah dinasihatkan bahawa semalam, pada 27 September, wartawan, kedua-duanya, hadir pada masa yang ditetapkan untuk deposit mereka seperti yang dijadualkan oleh defendan, dan saya dinasihatkan -- dan saya akan membetulkan ini jika saya Saya salah -- bahawa kedua-dua wartawan memetik keistimewaan wartawan yang mereka anggap wujud di bawah Pindaan Pertama supaya mereka tidak menjawab sebarang soalan pada deposisi tersebut.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, my bill would amend the Food and Drugs Act and the Narcotic Control Act to impose minimum prison sentences of one year for a first offence and two years for a further offence in cases where a person is convicted of trafficking in a controlled or restricted drug or a narcotic within 500 metres of an elementary school or a high school.

Hypothesis: Drug traffickers will get two years in prison.

The bill, which is not yet a law, only has 2 year minimum sentences for second offenses within certain locations, so it is neither correct nor incorrect that drug traffickers will get 2 years in prison.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, rang undang-undang saya akan meminda Akta Makanan dan Dadah dan Akta Kawalan Narkotik untuk mengenakan hukuman penjara minimum setahun untuk kesalahan pertama dan dua tahun untuk kesalahan selanjutnya dalam kes di mana seseorang disabitkan kesalahan mengedar dalam kawalan atau dadah larangan atau narkotik dalam lingkungan 500 meter dari sekolah rendah atau sekolah menengah.

Pengedar dadah akan mendapat dua tahun penjara.


Premise: I have approximately 1,200 signatures from individuals who are asking members of parliament to oppose any amendments to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or any other federal legislation which would provide for the exclusion of the reference to the supremacy of God in our constitution and laws, and I certainly agree.

Hypothesis: Canadians want God to stay in their rights and freedoms.

The context talks about a petition Canadians have signed about amendments to federal legislation not excluding the reference of the supremacy of God, but that doesn't speak to whether or not God would be removed from their rights and freedoms or simply the legislation, so the statement is neither. The system might have tripped on the context.

Saya mempunyai kira-kira 1,200 tandatangan daripada individu yang meminta ahli parlimen untuk menentang sebarang pindaan kepada Piagam Hak dan Kebebasan Kanada atau mana-mana perundangan persekutuan lain yang akan memperuntukkan pengecualian rujukan kepada ketuanan Tuhan dalam perlembagaan dan undang-undang kita, dan saya pasti bersetuju.

Orang Kanada mahu Tuhan kekal dalam hak dan kebebasan mereka.


Premise: I can confirm that the Canada-Japan relationship, as well as the multilateral relationship that organization has with Asia-Pacific countries, has served Canada well in encouraging other countries to follow the Canadian example of signing the convention banning anti-personnel mines, which took place in December of last year.

Hypothesis: Canada-Japan relationship has weakened relations with Brazil.

Canada-Japan relationship may or may not have effected relations with Brazil. Only Asia-Pacific countries were specifically mentioned.

Saya boleh mengesahkan bahawa hubungan Kanada-Jepun, serta hubungan pelbagai hala organisasi dengan negara-negara Asia-Pasifik, telah memberi perkhidmatan yang baik kepada Kanada dalam menggalakkan negara lain untuk mengikuti contoh Kanada menandatangani konvensyen yang mengharamkan lombong anti-kakitangan, yang mengambil masa tempat pada Disember tahun lepas.

Hubungan Kanada-Jepun telah melemahkan hubungan dengan Brazil.


Premise: Take, for example, the ban on partial birth abortion. It's a brutal practice. People from both political parties came together in the halls of Congress and voted overwhelmingly to ban that practice. It made a lot of sense. My opponent, in that he's out of the mainstream, voted against that law.

Hypothesis: partial birth abortion is wrong

Partial birth abortion should be considered on a case by case basis: if the birth is life threatening no one could properly say what is right or wrong in that situation.

Ambil contoh, larangan pengguguran separa kelahiran. Ia satu amalan kejam. Orang ramai daripada kedua-dua parti politik berkumpul di dewan Kongres dan mengundi secara besar-besaran untuk mengharamkan amalan itu. Ia masuk akal. Lawan saya, kerana dia keluar dari arus perdana, mengundi menentang undang-undang itu.

pengguguran separa kelahiran adalah salah


Premise: In addition, I have a child who is in the ninth-grade biology class, and this has spilled over into other classes. It's not just the biology class that has been affected by this. My child has heard comments from other students, school board member students in her classroom about evolution being against their religion, and do you think we came from monkeys, how can you think we came from monkeys.

Hypothesis: the child is in french school

it states the child is in 9th grade but does not specify what kind of school the child is in. the system may have missed as it says that the child is in biology class

Di samping itu, saya mempunyai seorang anak yang berada di kelas biologi gred sembilan, dan ini telah merebak ke kelas lain. Ia bukan hanya kelas biologi yang telah terjejas oleh ini. Anak saya telah mendengar komen daripada pelajar lain, pelajar ahli lembaga sekolah di dalam bilik darjahnya tentang evolusi bertentangan dengan agama mereka, dan adakah anda fikir kami datang dari monyet, bagaimana anda boleh fikir kami datang dari monyet.

kanak-kanak itu bersekolah bahasa perancis


Premise: I think credibility is going to be very important in the future in the Middle East. I want everybody to know should I be the president Israel's going to be our friend. I'm going to stand by Israel. Secondly, that I think it's important to reach out to moderate Arab nations, like Jordan and Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

Hypothesis: He needs to win the election before being friends with Israel.

I want everybody to know should I be the president Israel's going to be our friend. This sentence implies that he is not the president yet.

Saya fikir kredibiliti akan menjadi sangat penting pada masa depan di Timur Tengah. Saya mahu semua orang tahu sekiranya saya menjadi presiden Israel akan menjadi kawan kita. Saya akan berdiri di sisi Israel. Kedua, saya fikir adalah penting untuk menjangkau negara Arab yang sederhana, seperti Jordan dan Mesir, Arab Saudi dan Kuwait.

Dia perlu memenangi pilihan raya sebelum berkawan dengan Israel.


Premise: My sister had graduated that year, and I attended the commencement ceremony. And she had talked about Visigoths and things like that that she had spoken about in her commencement speech. And essentially she was speaking up for the teachers and the biology textbook.

Hypothesis: There are 10 teams in the NFL of which only one wins the Superbowl each year. Every team has an equal chance not to win a Superbowl.

Some teams may be stronger and have a higher chance to win

Kakak saya telah menamatkan pengajian pada tahun itu, dan saya menghadiri majlis perasmian. Dan dia telah bercakap tentang Visigoth dan perkara-perkara seperti yang dia telah bercakap tentang dalam ucapan permulaannya. Dan pada dasarnya dia bercakap untuk guru dan buku teks biologi.

Terdapat 10 pasukan dalam NFL yang mana hanya satu daripadanya memenangi Superbowl setiap tahun. Setiap pasukan mempunyai peluang yang sama untuk tidak memenangi Superbowl.


Premise: In all due respect, I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, never mind. Anyway, let me quote the Lewin report. The Lewin report is a group of folks who are not politically affiliated. They analyzed the senator's plan. It cost $1.2 trillion.

Hypothesis: The Levin report is named after a person named Levin

not clear what the report is named after

Dengan segala hormatnya, saya tidak begitu pasti ia boleh dipercayai untuk memetik organisasi berita terkemuka tentang -- oh, tidak mengapa. Bagaimanapun, izinkan saya memetik laporan Lewin. Laporan Lewin ialah sekumpulan orang yang tidak mempunyai kaitan politik. Mereka menganalisis rancangan senator itu. Ia berharga $1.2 trilion.

Laporan Levin dinamakan sempena nama seseorang yang bernama Levin


Premise: We return in session, and I want to apologize to the assembled spectators and, of course, to the media. We handled a matter in chambers that you'll become aware of in an effort to resolve a problem, and I think we did. These things arise during trials from time to time. That is the first time that we've had that type of matter in this trial. We may have others as the trial unfolds. But it was a necessary exercise. And we try to keep them at a minimum and we will keep them at a minimum during the trial.

Hypothesis: This is the first time and the last time that this will happen in this trial.

The statement claims that "this is the first time" but it also says that "we may have others" therefore one can not know if it will happen again.

Kami kembali dalam sesi, dan saya ingin memohon maaf kepada penonton yang berkumpul dan, sudah tentu, kepada media. Kami mengendalikan satu perkara di dalam bilik yang anda akan ketahui dalam usaha menyelesaikan masalah, dan saya fikir kami melakukannya. Perkara-perkara ini timbul semasa ujian dari semasa ke semasa. Itulah kali pertama kami mengalami perkara seperti itu dalam percubaan ini. Kita mungkin mempunyai orang lain semasa perbicaraan berlangsung. Tetapi ia adalah latihan yang diperlukan. Dan kami cuba mengekalkannya pada tahap minimum dan kami akan mengekalkannya pada tahap minimum semasa percubaan.

Ini adalah kali pertama dan kali terakhir perkara ini akan berlaku dalam percubaan ini.


Premise: Justice, we are not making an empirical claim at all. Nothing in our Copyright Clause claim hangs upon the empirical assertion about impeding progress. Our only argument is, this is a structural limit necessary to assure that what would be an effectively perpetual term not be permitted under the copyright laws.

Hypothesis: This case involves more than one party

In this case, "party" refers to the people affected legally affected by the case, not the lawyers or judges. Because, we do not know much about the nature of the case and who is involved, we cannot say definitively whether or not more than one party is involved in this case. The system may have though I was referring to the judge and the lawyer.

Keadilan, kami tidak membuat tuntutan empirikal sama sekali. Tiada apa-apa dalam tuntutan Klausa Hak Cipta kami bergantung pada penegasan empirikal tentang menghalang kemajuan. Satu-satunya hujah kami ialah, ini adalah had struktur yang diperlukan untuk memastikan bahawa apa yang akan menjadi istilah yang berkekalan secara berkesan tidak dibenarkan di bawah undang-undang hak cipta.

Kes ini melibatkan lebih daripada satu pihak


Premise: I also believe in the Golden Rule. And I agree with a lot of the other things that the governor has said. We do have a serious problem in our culture. Tipper and I have worked on the problem of violence in entertainment aimed at children. She's worked on it longer than I have.

Hypothesis: Violent entertainment is usually aimed at children

This cannot be ascertained from the statement

Saya juga percaya kepada Peraturan Emas. Dan saya bersetuju dengan banyak perkara lain yang dikatakan oleh gabenor. Kami mempunyai masalah serius dalam budaya kami. Saya dan Tipper telah mengusahakan masalah keganasan dalam hiburan yang ditujukan kepada kanak-kanak. Dia telah mengusahakannya lebih lama daripada saya.

Hiburan ganas biasanya ditujukan kepada kanak-kanak


Premise: And I recall the meeting starting with Bill Buckingham sort of -- I'm sorry, Trudy Peterman spoke about her -- actually, hold on. Give me one second to think about this. Yes, Trudy Peterman spoke. She was the high school principal at the time. And I know that she spoke because the thing that she said seemed very similar to her graduation speech that she had said just previously.

Hypothesis: Trudy Peterman worked with Bill Buckingham.

Dan saya masih ingat pertemuan itu bermula dengan Bill Buckingham semacam -- Saya minta maaf, Trudy Peterman bercakap tentang dia -- sebenarnya, tunggu. Beri saya satu saat untuk memikirkan perkara ini. Ya, Trudy Peterman bercakap. Dia adalah pengetua sekolah menengah pada masa itu. Dan saya tahu bahawa dia bercakap kerana perkara yang dia katakan kelihatan sangat serupa dengan ucapan tamat pengajiannya yang dia katakan sebelum ini.

Trudy Peterman bekerja dengan Bill Buckingham.


Premise: And education is my number one priority, because I think that it's the most important big major change that we can bring in our country. I agree with Governor Bush that we should have new accountability, testing of students. I think that we should require states to test all students, test schools and school districts, and I think that we should go further and require teacher testing for new teachers also.

Hypothesis: The speaker is referring to George Bush

We don't know if it's George Bush or Jeb bush

Dan pendidikan adalah keutamaan nombor satu saya, kerana saya fikir ia adalah perubahan besar yang paling penting yang boleh kita bawa di negara kita. Saya bersetuju dengan Gabenor Bush bahawa kita harus mempunyai akauntabiliti baharu, menguji pelajar. Saya berpendapat bahawa kita harus meminta negeri untuk menguji semua pelajar, sekolah ujian dan daerah sekolah, dan saya fikir kita harus pergi lebih jauh dan memerlukan ujian guru untuk guru baharu juga.

Penceramah itu merujuk kepada George Bush


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for his intervention, but I want to clarify that Bill C-11 does not make any changes to the current automotive tariff policy; rather it continues to ensure that all auto manufacturers in Canada, auto pact and non-auto pact companies, import parts duty free.

Hypothesis: The hon. member intervened to support Bill C-11.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ucapkan terima kasih kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk campur tangan beliau, tetapi saya ingin menjelaskan bahawa Rang Undang-undang C-11 tidak membuat sebarang perubahan kepada dasar tarif automotif semasa; sebaliknya ia terus memastikan semua pengeluar kereta di Kanada, syarikat pakatan auto dan bukan pakatan auto, mengimport alat ganti bebas cukai.

Yang hon. ahli campur tangan untuk menyokong RUU C-11.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, just a few days ago the grocery distributors council announced an initiative with the Canadian standards council, the industry, the provinces, the federal government and the Consumers' Association of Canada to conduct meetings and put together a criteria for voluntary labelling.

Hypothesis: The speaker is in favor of mandatory labelling.

The speaker's opinion on voluntary or mandatory labelling is not expressed; he is just stating a fact.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, hanya beberapa hari yang lalu majlis pengedar runcit mengumumkan satu inisiatif dengan majlis piawaian Kanada, industri, wilayah, kerajaan persekutuan dan Persatuan Pengguna Kanada untuk menjalankan mesyuarat dan menyusun kriteria untuk pelabelan sukarela.

Penceramah memihak kepada pelabelan wajib.


Premise: I believe the question was asked by the representative for Nanaimo-Cowichan that if we cannot raise these specific cases in the Chamber where we have immunity from prosecution, as sensitive as they are and perhaps as insensitive as it appears we are in raising them, then where can we raise them?

It's unknown if the representative for Nanaimo-Cowichan is mute

Saya percaya soalan itu diajukan oleh wakil Nanaimo-Cowichan bahawa jika kita tidak dapat membangkitkan kes-kes khusus ini di Dewan di mana kita mempunyai kekebalan daripada pendakwaan, sesensitif mereka dan mungkin tidak sensitif seperti yang dilihat dalam membangkitkannya, maka di mana kita boleh membesarkan mereka?