Premise: That the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications have power to sit at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday December 9, 1997, for its study of Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act (maritime liability), even though the Senate may then be sitting and that rule 95(4) be suspended in relation thereto.

Hypothesis: Canada has four a's in it.

Canada only has three a's in it. The system sometimes has trouble with the letter content of words.

Bahawa Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat Pengangkutan dan Komunikasi mempunyai kuasa untuk bersidang pada pukul 4:00 petang. pada hari Selasa 9 Disember 1997, untuk kajiannya terhadap Rang Undang-Undang S-4, Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Perkapalan Kanada (liabiliti maritim), walaupun Senat mungkin bersidang dan peraturan 95(4) itu digantung berhubung dengannya.


Premise: And I think to answer your question, I think both of us care a lot about the environment. We may have different approaches. We may have different approaches in terms of how we deal with local folks. I just cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting without any input.

Hypothesis: I approach issues of the environment out of care and concern, but you don't care.

This is definitely incorrect.  The statement was clearly defined that both cared about the environment.  My statement changed that into that only one cared and not the other.

Dan saya fikir untuk menjawab soalan anda, saya rasa kami berdua sangat mengambil berat tentang alam sekitar. Kita mungkin mempunyai pendekatan yang berbeza. Kami mungkin mempunyai pendekatan yang berbeza dari segi cara kami berurusan dengan orang tempatan. Saya hanya memetik contoh pentadbiran hanya bertindak secara unilateral tanpa sebarang input.

Saya mendekati isu alam sekitar kerana mengambil berat dan prihatin, tetapi anda tidak peduli.


Premise: I remember when the stories first came out about the stops in New Jersey by the highway patrol there. And I know it's been going on a long time. In some ways this is just a new label for something that has been going on for years. But I have to confess that it was the first time that I really focused on it in a new way.

Hypothesis: the highway was stopping cars

Saya masih ingat ketika pertama kali keluar cerita tentang perhentian di New Jersey oleh peronda lebuh raya di sana. Dan saya tahu ia sudah lama berlaku. Dalam beberapa cara ini hanyalah label baharu untuk sesuatu yang telah berlaku selama bertahun-tahun. Tetapi saya harus mengaku bahawa ini adalah kali pertama saya benar-benar menumpukan perhatiannya dengan cara yang baru.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, to answer the member's first point about lower unemployment, the Minister of Finance in budget plan 1999 on page 64 projects that employment insurance benefit payments will rise from $11.8 billion to $13.8 billion by 2000-01, an extra $2 billion for employment insurance payments.

Hypothesis: The budget will rise by 3 billion dollars

The passage states that the budget will rise by 2 billion dollars.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, untuk menjawab perkara pertama ahli mengenai kadar pengangguran yang lebih rendah, Menteri Kewangan dalam rancangan belanjawan 1999 di muka surat 64 memproyeksikan bahawa bayaran faedah insurans pekerjaan akan meningkat daripada $11.8 bilion kepada $13.8 bilion menjelang 2000-01, tambahan $2 bilion untuk pekerjaan. bayaran insurans.

Bajet akan meningkat sebanyak 3 bilion dolar


Premise: Because the government is acting in such a cavalier manner, because we cannot count on the members of this parliament who sit at the Liberal caucus table to defend the referendum act, and because we cannot count on them to defend the extraordinary vitality of the democracy of the National Assembly and its right to decide on the matter, I have no other choice but to move the following, pursuant to Standing Order 60:

Hypothesis: The government is acting on the issue

The government is acting in a cavalier manner

Kerana kerajaan bertindak dengan cara yang angkuh, kerana kita tidak boleh mengharapkan ahli parlimen ini yang duduk di meja kaukus Liberal untuk mempertahankan akta referendum, dan kerana kita tidak boleh mengharapkan mereka untuk mempertahankan daya hidup luar biasa demokrasi. Dewan Negara dan haknya untuk membuat keputusan mengenai perkara itu, saya tidak mempunyai pilihan lain selain untuk memindahkan perkara berikut, menurut Peraturan Mesyuarat 60:


Premise: I suggest to the members opposite that what they really should be focusing on here is to let farmers, the ten members, the majority of members who will be sitting on that board, do their job and let them provide the Canadian Wheat Board with the leadership in concert with the Government of Canada, in concert with all the people of Canada, the best options for all farmers.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes that farmers need to get lots of input from the Government of Canada.

The speaker believes that farmers need to GIVE input, not get.

Saya mencadangkan kepada ahli sebaliknya bahawa apa yang mereka benar-benar harus fokus di sini adalah untuk membiarkan petani, sepuluh ahli, majoriti ahli yang akan duduk di lembaga itu, melakukan tugas mereka dan biarkan mereka menyediakan Lembaga Gandum Kanada dengan kepimpinan. bersama dengan Kerajaan Kanada, bersama semua rakyat Kanada, pilihan terbaik untuk semua petani.

Penceramah percaya bahawa petani perlu mendapatkan banyak input daripada Kerajaan Kanada.


Premise: If we have allies in the Balkans we have allies, NATO, ready, willing and able to go and carry a big part of the burden. In Africa we did not. Now, we have tried -- our countries tried to create an Africa crisis response team there, and we've met some resistance.

Hypothesis: Allies were not willing to help form a crisis response team despite allies being available in Balkan.

Allies are willing to help in Africa, statement is false

Jika kita mempunyai sekutu di Balkan, kita mempunyai sekutu, NATO, bersedia, sanggup dan mampu untuk pergi dan memikul sebahagian besar beban. Di Afrika kami tidak melakukannya. Sekarang, kami telah mencuba -- negara kami cuba mewujudkan pasukan tindak balas krisis Afrika di sana, dan kami telah menemui beberapa tentangan.

Sekutu tidak bersedia untuk membantu membentuk pasukan tindak balas krisis walaupun sekutu tersedia di Balkan.


Premise: But Russia has to make the decision. We can work with them on security matters, for example, but it's their call to make. So I'm not exactly sure where the vice president is coming from, but I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the world saying, we do it this way, so should you.

Hypothesis: Russia is seen as the ugly American

Tetapi Rusia perlu membuat keputusan. Kita boleh bekerjasama dengan mereka dalam hal keselamatan, contohnya, tetapi itu adalah panggilan mereka untuk membuat. Jadi saya tidak pasti dari mana datangnya naib presiden, tetapi saya fikir satu cara untuk kita akhirnya dilihat sebagai orang Amerika yang hodoh adalah untuk kita pergi ke seluruh dunia sambil berkata, kita melakukannya dengan cara ini, begitu juga dengan anda. .

Rusia dilihat sebagai orang Amerika yang hodoh


Premise: Mr. Speaker, earlier I asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs if, in the spirit of the Beijing conference on women, he would assure that funding for the women's group going to APEC this week in Vancouver would be there, as I had had calls from my constituents who are members of women's groups and who were not getting any funding to go.

Hypothesis: There is a single women's group.

The statement says there are "constituents who are members of women's groups" i.e. plural therefore it is definitely incorrect to say that "There is a single women's group" singular.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, sebelum ini saya bertanya kepada Menteri Luar Negeri jika, dalam semangat persidangan Beijing mengenai wanita, beliau akan memberi jaminan bahawa pembiayaan untuk kumpulan wanita yang pergi ke APEC minggu ini di Vancouver akan ada, kerana saya telah mendapat panggilan daripada konstituen saya yang merupakan ahli kumpulan wanita dan yang tidak mendapat sebarang pembiayaan untuk pergi.


Premise: He just said he wants everybody to be able to buy in to the same plan that senators and congressmen get. That costs the government $7,700 per family. If every family in America signed up, like the senator suggested, if would cost us $5 trillion over 10 years.

Hypothesis: SHe just said he wants everybody to be able to buy in to the same plan that senators and congressmen get

He said, not She. I think the model got confused by the gender.

Dia hanya berkata dia mahu semua orang dapat menerima rancangan yang sama seperti yang diperoleh senator dan ahli kongres. Itu kos kerajaan $7,700 setiap keluarga. Jika setiap keluarga di Amerika mendaftar, seperti yang dicadangkan oleh senator, jika kita akan menelan belanja $5 trilion dalam tempoh 10 tahun.


Premise: Senator, the last debate, President Bush said he did not favor a draft. You agreed with him. But our National Guard and Reserve forces are being severely strained because many of them are being held beyond their enlistments. Some of them say that it's a back-door draft.

Hypothesis: The Senator is unsure of his position on the draft.

The Senator agreed with Bush that the draft was unfavorable. The word unsure confused the AI

Senator, perbahasan terakhir, Presiden Bush berkata beliau tidak memihak kepada draf. Anda bersetuju dengannya. Tetapi pasukan Pengawal Kebangsaan dan Simpanan kita sedang tertekan dengan teruk kerana ramai daripada mereka ditahan di luar pendaftaran mereka. Sesetengah daripada mereka mengatakan bahawa ia adalah draf pintu belakang.

Senator tidak pasti kedudukannya dalam draf itu.


Premise: I will not do anything to affect the rights of hunters or sportsmen. I think that homeowners have to be respected and their right to have a gun if they wish to. The problem I see is that there are too many guns getting into the hands of children, and criminals, and people who, for whatever reason, some kind of history of stalking or domestic abuse really should not be able to get guns.

Hypothesis: No hunters or sportsmen are stalkers.

It is incorrect that a sportsmen or hunter isn't a stalker because they stalk their pray.

Saya tidak akan melakukan apa-apa untuk menjejaskan hak pemburu atau ahli sukan. Saya berpendapat bahawa pemilik rumah perlu dihormati dan hak mereka untuk memiliki senjata jika mereka mahu. Masalah yang saya lihat ialah terdapat terlalu banyak senjata api yang jatuh ke tangan kanak-kanak, dan penjenayah, dan orang yang, atas sebab apa pun, beberapa jenis sejarah mengintai atau penderaan rumah tangga benar-benar tidak sepatutnya boleh mendapatkan senjata api.

Tiada pemburu atau ahli sukan yang mengintai.


Premise: It is -- well, it -- let me say with respond -- in response to both of those questions, an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause. Something that was the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would violate the Copyright Clause, but the Framers specifically did not put in numbers.

Hypothesis: Unlimited time could or could not violate the Copyright Clause.

It says Unlimited time would violate the Copyright clause.

Ia adalah -- baiklah -- biar saya katakan dengan jawapan -- sebagai jawapan kepada kedua-dua soalan tersebut, masa tanpa had akan melanggar Klausa Hak Cipta. Sesuatu yang setara dengan fungsi masa tanpa had akan melanggar Klausa Hak Cipta, tetapi Penggubal secara khusus tidak memasukkan nombor.

Masa tanpa had boleh atau tidak akan melanggar Klausa Hak Cipta.


Premise: He declared the need for a new tax cut for the oil companies in Texas an emergency need, and so the money was taken away from the CHIP program. There's -- you don't have to take my word for this. There is now a federal judge's opinion about the current management of this program ordering the State of Texas to do -- you should read that judge's language about this.

Hypothesis: The tax cut did not affect any other programs

Money was taken from the CHIP program to fund the tax cut.

Dia mengisytiharkan keperluan untuk pemotongan cukai baru untuk syarikat minyak di Texas sebagai keperluan kecemasan, dan oleh itu wang itu telah diambil dari program CHIP. Ada -- anda tidak perlu mengambil kata-kata saya untuk ini. Kini terdapat pendapat hakim persekutuan tentang pengurusan semasa program ini yang memerintahkan Negeri Texas melakukannya -- anda harus membaca bahasa hakim itu tentang perkara ini.

Pemotongan cukai tidak menjejaskan mana-mana program lain


Premise: There is something illogical about this, and members will understand that, when one sees the Department of Justice spending the $193 million it will be getting via supply, why the Bloc Quebecois cannot agree with this, given that these monies are mismanaged and misspent by a minister concerned only with raising her profile and getting easy votes in the west.

Hypothesis: The Department of Justice is spending $193 it received via supply.

According to the original statement, the Department of Justice is spending $193 MILLION via supply, not $193.

Terdapat sesuatu yang tidak logik tentang perkara ini, dan ahli akan memahami bahawa, apabila seseorang melihat Jabatan Kehakiman membelanjakan $193 juta ia akan diperoleh melalui pembekalan, mengapa Bloc Quebecois tidak boleh bersetuju dengan ini, memandangkan wang ini disalahuruskan dan disalahgunakan oleh seorang menteri hanya mementingkan menaikkan profilnya dan mendapat undi mudah di barat.

Jabatan Kehakiman membelanjakan $193 yang diterima melalui pembekalan.


Premise: I would support the Orrin Hatch version of it, not the Senator Kennedy version. But let me say to you, Mr. Vice President, we're happy with our laws on our books. That bill did -- there was another bill that did die in committee. But I want to repeat, if you have a state that fully supports the law like we do in Texas, we're going to go after all crime. And we're going to make sure people get punished for the crime. And in this case we can't enhance the penalty any more than putting those three thugs to deaths. And that's what's gonna happen in the State of Texas.

Hypothesis: Kennedy was a governor at this time.

It's definitely incorrect because he's referred to as a senator, and you cannot be both a governor and a senator at the same time. It's difficult because this is probably knowledge that the system does not possess.

Saya akan menyokong versi Orrin Hatch itu, bukan versi Senator Kennedy. Tetapi biar saya katakan kepada anda, Tuan Naib Presiden, kami gembira dengan undang-undang kami pada buku kami. Rang undang-undang itu berlaku -- terdapat satu lagi rang undang-undang yang telah mati dalam jawatankuasa. Tetapi saya ingin ulangi, jika anda mempunyai negeri yang menyokong sepenuhnya undang-undang seperti yang kami lakukan di Texas, kami akan pergi selepas semua jenayah. Dan kami akan memastikan orang ramai dihukum kerana jenayah itu. Dan dalam kes ini kita tidak boleh meningkatkan hukuman lebih daripada membunuh tiga samseng itu. Dan itulah yang akan berlaku di Negeri Texas.

Kennedy adalah seorang gabenor pada masa ini.


Premise: That there is some resentment of U.S. power. So I think that the idea of humility is an important one. But I think that we also have to have a sense of mission in the world. We have to protect our capacity to push forward what America's all about. That means not only military strength and our values, it also means keeping our economy strong.

Hypothesis: That there is some resentment of U.N. power. So I think that the idea of humility is an important one. But I think that we also have to have a sense of mission in the world

The statement clearly states U.S Power, not U.N.

Bahawa terdapat sedikit kebencian terhadap kuasa AS. Jadi saya berpendapat bahawa idea merendah diri adalah satu yang penting. Tetapi saya fikir kita juga perlu mempunyai semangat misi di dunia. Kita perlu melindungi keupayaan kita untuk memajukan apa yang Amerika itu semua. Ini bermakna bukan sahaja kekuatan ketenteraan dan nilai kita, ia juga bermakna memastikan ekonomi kita kukuh.

Bahawa terdapat sedikit kebencian terhadap kuasa PBB. Jadi saya berpendapat bahawa idea merendah diri adalah satu yang penting. Tetapi saya fikir kita juga perlu mempunyai semangat misi di dunia


Premise: Hon. Joyce Fairbairn , Joint Chair of the Special Joint Committee on the Amendment to Term 17 of the Terms of Union of Newfoundland, informed the Senate that, pursuant to the Senate's order of reference of November 5, she had deposited with the Clerk on Friday, December 5, 1997, the final report of the Special Joint Committee.

Hypothesis: Joyce Fairbairn made contact with the Senate on November 5 that she deposited with the clerk that day.

She deposited on December 5, not November 5. However, the system may have thought it was correct since it was closely connected to the Senate.

Yang Berhormat Joyce Fairbairn , Pengerusi Bersama Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas mengenai Pindaan kepada Penggal 17 Syarat Kesatuan Newfoundland, memaklumkan Senat bahawa, menurut perintah rujukan Senat pada 5 November, dia telah mendepositkan dengan Kerani pada hari Jumaat, Disember 5, 1997, laporan akhir Jawatankuasa Bersama Khas.

Joyce Fairbairn membuat hubungan dengan Senat pada 5 November yang didepositkannya dengan kerani hari itu.


Premise: You will note, honourable senators, that I am not following the Reform line of putting a lowered debt as a priority, because the economic growth that is so necessary for more jobs is better assured by a drop in taxes and charges against total payrolls, and because the debt-to-GDP ratio will probably drop to 63 per cent within three years.

Hypothesis: Following the Reform line means lowering the taxes.

Lowering the reform line means lowering the debt as priority, which means INCREASING the taxes

Anda akan perhatikan, senator yang berhormat, bahawa saya tidak mengikuti garis Pembaharuan yang meletakkan hutang yang lebih rendah sebagai keutamaan, kerana pertumbuhan ekonomi yang sangat diperlukan untuk lebih banyak pekerjaan lebih terjamin dengan penurunan cukai dan caj terhadap jumlah gaji, dan kerana nisbah hutang kepada KDNK mungkin akan turun kepada 63 peratus dalam tempoh tiga tahun.

Mengikuti garis Pembaharuan bermakna menurunkan cukai.


Premise: Farmers are going to find out how the decision was made to make a public announcement that our grain was not selling in Japan and why this government was unable to settle the labour negotiations to keep our grain moving; and not only settle negotiations, but in fact have legislation in place to facilitate grain movement.

Hypothesis: Farmers have been included in the decision making

Petani akan mengetahui bagaimana keputusan dibuat untuk membuat pengumuman awam bahawa bijirin kami tidak dijual di Jepun dan mengapa kerajaan ini tidak dapat menyelesaikan rundingan buruh untuk memastikan bijirin kami bergerak; dan bukan sahaja menyelesaikan rundingan, tetapi sebenarnya mempunyai undang-undang untuk memudahkan pergerakan bijirin.

Petani telah dimasukkan dalam membuat keputusan


Premise: The Government of Canada, through the Department of Justice, should institute a study of the accountability of corporate executives and directors for the wrongful or negligent acts of the corporation and should introduce in the Parliament of Canada such amendments to legislation as are necessary to ensure that corporate executives and directors are held properly accountable for workplace safety.

Hypothesis: The speaker thinks corporate executives care deeply about workplace safety

He wants to study corporate executives because he thinks they aren’t accountable fir workplace safety

Kerajaan Kanada, melalui Jabatan Kehakiman, harus memulakan kajian tentang akauntabiliti eksekutif dan pengarah korporat untuk perbuatan salah atau cuai perbadanan dan harus memperkenalkan di Parlimen Kanada pindaan undang-undang yang perlu untuk memastikan bahawa eksekutif dan pengarah korporat dipertanggungjawabkan dengan sewajarnya untuk keselamatan tempat kerja.

Penceramah berpendapat eksekutif korporat sangat mengambil berat tentang keselamatan tempat kerja


Premise: And after she had spoken, Bertha Spahr also spoke, as well. She's the department chairperson, and, actually, I had her as a science teacher. And she presented information to the board, documents, that she and I believe other members of the science department had researched on, I guess cases that had been set down before on creationism in the public school system or something of that nature, just to show them that, you know, if they were still considering this idea, that they might, I don't know, be met with some litigation or something.

Hypothesis: Bertha Spahr is stupid

Bertha Spahr is a department chairperson. She can't be stupid.

Dan selepas dia bercakap, Bertha Spahr juga bercakap. Dia pengerusi jabatan, dan, sebenarnya, saya mempunyai dia sebagai guru sains. Dan dia membentangkan maklumat kepada lembaga, dokumen, yang dia dan saya percaya ahli jabatan sains yang lain telah meneliti, saya rasa kes-kes yang telah ditetapkan sebelum ini mengenai penciptaan dalam sistem sekolah awam atau sesuatu yang bersifat sedemikian, hanya untuk menunjukkan mereka yang, anda tahu, jika mereka masih mempertimbangkan idea ini, bahawa mereka mungkin, saya tidak tahu, akan menghadapi beberapa litigasi atau sesuatu.


Premise: And at the time when you wrote the original order and you used the words "perceived, saw, and heard," we were concerned, as you well know, with the word "perceived" in terms as to what's the thought process. And there was dialogue on the phone amongst all of us, and you made it very clear that you did not want any testimony that would otherwise relate to biases and prejudices. And, in fact, when you reviewed the notes of the reporters, you had also indicated that your review of Heidi Bubb's notes and the e-mails clearly evidence that there was no bias in the writings, those writings.

Hypothesis: The article thinks that perceived is strong evidence

They don't think perceived is good evidence because of bias

Dan pada masa anda menulis susunan asal dan anda menggunakan perkataan "perceived, saw, and heard," kami bimbang, seperti yang anda sedia maklum, dengan perkataan "perceived" dari segi apa proses pemikiran. Dan terdapat dialog di telefon di kalangan kami semua, dan anda menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa anda tidak mahu sebarang keterangan yang sebaliknya akan berkaitan dengan berat sebelah dan prasangka. Dan, sebenarnya, apabila anda menyemak nota wartawan, anda juga telah menunjukkan bahawa semakan anda terhadap nota Heidi Bubb dan e-mel jelas membuktikan bahawa tidak ada berat sebelah dalam tulisan, tulisan itu.

Artikel itu berpendapat bahawa persepsi adalah bukti kukuh


Premise: Yes, and what -- but the definition of the term was a responsibility vested in Congress, because it has the power -- the legislative history of the 1998 act itself suggests what was going on here and suggests why the Framers gave this authority to Congress. There were numerous hearings, there were testimony by the folks that represent the same position as petitioners here as to why this shouldn't be done, why it should be that this done. Congress weighed -- as this Court, the phrase Court used, I think it was in the Feist case,the delicate balance that was so difficult for Congress to--

Hypothesis: The framers are part of the congress

The framers designed the constitution and not all of them are in congress.

Ya, dan apa -- tetapi definisi istilah itu adalah tanggungjawab yang diberikan kepada Kongres, kerana ia mempunyai kuasa -- sejarah perundangan akta 1998 itu sendiri mencadangkan apa yang berlaku di sini dan mencadangkan mengapa Penggubal memberikan kuasa ini kepada Kongres . Terdapat banyak perbicaraan, terdapat keterangan oleh orang-orang yang mewakili kedudukan yang sama dengan pempetisyen di sini tentang mengapa ini tidak patut dilakukan, mengapa ini harus dilakukan. Kongres menimbang -- kerana Mahkamah ini, frasa yang digunakan oleh Mahkamah, saya fikir ia adalah dalam kes Feist, keseimbangan halus yang sangat sukar untuk Kongres untuk--

Penggubal adalah sebahagian daripada kongres


Premise: By the way, they are going to build this fund and they are going to have some Liberal hacks running it unaccountable because there are clauses in here which, if they do not get changed, will make sure that the investment board of the Canada pension plan is not accountable to Parliament.

Hypothesis: Canadian parliament has created a pension plan that requires approval by the investment board of Canada.

It is definitely incorrect. I stated that the investment plan was created by parliament and must be approved by the investment board; however the investment plan was created by the investment board and must be approved by parliament. The system may not be able to interpret a simple switch like that.

Ngomong-ngomong, mereka akan membina dana ini dan mereka akan mempunyai beberapa penggodaman Liberal menjalankannya tidak boleh dipertanggungjawabkan kerana terdapat klausa di sini yang, jika mereka tidak diubah, akan memastikan bahawa lembaga pelaburan pelan pencen Kanada tidak bertanggungjawab kepada Parlimen.

Parlimen Kanada telah mencipta pelan pencen yang memerlukan kelulusan oleh lembaga pelaburan Kanada.


Premise: But I was as clear as I could possibly be that what is at issue here would be, for example, the particular events that the reporters wrote about and questions such as -- simple questions, did they attend the meeting, did they hear them say the comments, did they write the story immediately after, did they take notes at the time of the meeting.

Hypothesis: This is in spanish

Tetapi saya sejelas mungkin bahawa perkara yang menjadi isu di sini adalah, sebagai contoh, peristiwa tertentu yang ditulis oleh wartawan dan soalan seperti -- soalan mudah, adakah mereka menghadiri mesyuarat itu, adakah mereka mendengar mereka berkata komen, adakah mereka menulis cerita sejurus selepas itu, adakah mereka mengambil nota pada masa mesyuarat.


Premise: They refuse to testify at a deposition, and my suggestion to them was that if we were capable of resolving something as a result of this conference, that they would then attend a deposition, because I believe the defendants would have a right to cross-examine them or otherwise examine them prior to them taking the stand. And based upon that, they would then testify in court.

Hypothesis: deposition has three o's

deposition has exactly two o's. I think the system may have been examining another word.

Mereka enggan memberi keterangan pada deposisi, dan cadangan saya kepada mereka ialah jika kita mampu menyelesaikan sesuatu hasil daripada persidangan ini, mereka kemudiannya akan menghadiri deposisi, kerana saya percaya defendan akan mempunyai hak untuk menyoal balas. mereka atau sebaliknya memeriksa mereka sebelum mereka mengambil pendirian. Dan berdasarkan itu, mereka kemudiannya akan memberi keterangan di mahkamah.


Premise: By our order of last Thursday -- the date escapes me, I think it was Thursday -- the Court denied relief in that matter. The Court was advised that yesterday, on September the 27th, the reporters, both of them, showed up at the appointed times for their depositions as appropriately scheduled by the defendants, and I'm advised -- and I'll correct this if I'm wrong -- that both reporters cited the reporter's privilege that they consider to exist under the First Amendment so that they would not answer any questions at those depositions.

Hypothesis: it all happened on a weekend

Dengan perintah kami pada Khamis lalu -- tarikh itu terlepas daripada saya, saya fikir ia adalah Khamis -- Mahkamah menafikan pelepasan dalam perkara itu. Mahkamah dinasihatkan bahawa semalam, pada 27 September, wartawan, kedua-duanya, hadir pada masa yang ditetapkan untuk deposit mereka seperti yang dijadualkan oleh defendan, dan saya dinasihatkan -- dan saya akan membetulkan ini jika saya Saya salah -- bahawa kedua-dua wartawan memetik keistimewaan wartawan yang mereka anggap wujud di bawah Pindaan Pertama supaya mereka tidak menjawab sebarang soalan pada deposisi tersebut.


Premise: The federal government is talking about looking after home care, community services, strategies for youth, bursaries, pharmacare, ways to interest young people in science, a national school nutrition program, Canada wide benefits for poor children, a Canadian foundation for innovation, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Hypothesis: The federal government is talking about looking at you while you're at home.

They are not talking about spying on you while you're at home in this text, but rather "looking after home care". It's difficult because I used similar words from the text, but with a very different meaning.

Kerajaan persekutuan bercakap tentang menjaga penjagaan di rumah, khidmat masyarakat, strategi untuk belia, dermasiswa, farmasi, cara untuk menarik minat golongan muda dalam sains, program pemakanan sekolah kebangsaan, manfaat luas Kanada untuk kanak-kanak miskin, asas Kanada untuk inovasi, dan ayam hutan dalam pokok pir.

Kerajaan persekutuan bercakap tentang melihat anda semasa anda berada di rumah.


Premise: And we're not doing what we ought to do in terms of the technology. We have iris-identification technology. We have thumbprint, fingerprint technology today. We can know who the people are, that they're really the people they say they are when they cross the border.

Hypothesis: We can know who the people are if they cross the ocean.

The original passage stated crossing the border not the ocean.

Dan kami tidak melakukan apa yang sepatutnya kami lakukan dari segi teknologi. Kami mempunyai teknologi pengenalan iris. Kami mempunyai cap ibu jari, teknologi cap jari hari ini. Kita boleh tahu siapa orang itu, bahawa mereka benar-benar orang yang mereka katakan apabila mereka melintasi sempadan.

Kita boleh tahu siapa rakyat jika mereka menyeberangi lautan.


Premise: The House resumed from October 19, consideration of Bill C-6, an act to support and promote electronic commerce by protecting personal information that is collected, used or disclosed in certain circumstances, by providing for the use of electronic means to communicate or record information or transactions and by amending the Canada Evidence Act, the Statutory Instruments Act and the Statute Revision Act, as reported (with amendement) from the committee; and of motions in Group No. 1.

Hypothesis: Bill C-6 was not intended to change the Statute revision Act.

The Statute act was one of the laws to be amended, This was a fairly complex sentence to break down

Dewan disambung semula mulai 19 Oktober, pertimbangan Rang Undang-Undang C-6, akta untuk menyokong dan mempromosikan perdagangan elektronik dengan melindungi maklumat peribadi yang dikumpul, digunakan atau didedahkan dalam keadaan tertentu, dengan menyediakan penggunaan cara elektronik untuk menyampaikan atau merekod maklumat atau transaksi dan dengan meminda Akta Keterangan Kanada, Akta Instrumen Berkanun dan Akta Semakan Statut, seperti yang dilaporkan (dengan pindaan) daripada jawatankuasa; dan usul dalam Kumpulan No. 1.

Rang Undang-Undang C-6 tidak bertujuan untuk menukar Akta semakan Statut.


Premise: That's right, I'm sorry, Justice. What I'm saying is not that it's the retrospectivity that makes the First Amendment argument troubling -- I mean, that drives our First Amendment argument. All I'm saying is, we have addressed the retrospective portion of CTEA, and so I'm saying in the retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply ordinary, intermediate First Amendment review, and you would ask --

Hypothesis: retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply differently

retrospective portion of CTEA you would apply ordinarily

Betul, saya minta maaf, keadilan. Apa yang saya katakan bukanlah bahawa ia adalah retrospektif yang membuat hujah Pindaan Pertama mengganggu - maksud saya, yang mendorong hujah Pindaan Pertama kami. Apa yang saya katakan ialah, kami telah menangani bahagian retrospektif CTEA, dan jadi saya katakan di bahagian retrospektif CTEA anda akan menggunakan kajian Pindaan Pertama yang biasa, dan anda akan bertanya -

bahagian retrospektif CTEA yang anda akan gunakan secara berbeza


Premise: Mike Harris has kept his word to Ontarian voters by cutting taxes for working families by 30%, eliminating the huge provincial deficit by next year, creating over 850,000 new jobs and introducing a taxpayer protection act with teeth, all while increasing health care spending and absorbing the huge transfer cuts of this Liberal government.

Hypothesis: Healthcare protection of teeth was added

Mike Harris telah menepati janjinya kepada pengundi Ontaria dengan memotong cukai untuk keluarga yang bekerja sebanyak 30%, menghapuskan defisit wilayah yang besar menjelang tahun depan, mewujudkan lebih 850,000 pekerjaan baharu dan memperkenalkan akta perlindungan pembayar cukai dengan gigi, semuanya sambil meningkatkan perbelanjaan penjagaan kesihatan dan menyerap pemotongan pemindahan besar kerajaan Liberal ini.

Perlindungan penjagaan kesihatan gigi telah ditambah


Premise: To do so requires looking beyond the legislation and the criminal justice system at ways available to our society to deal with problems such as child poverty and child abuse, which are often an underlying cause of youth crime, and to help young people not to make the kind of choices that may lead them to engage in criminal behaviour.

Hypothesis: in order to get the legislation done it required a deal from society

To do so requires looking beyond the legislation.. Not a deal from society

Untuk berbuat demikian memerlukan melihat di luar perundangan dan sistem keadilan jenayah pada cara yang tersedia untuk masyarakat kita untuk menangani masalah seperti kemiskinan kanak-kanak dan penderaan kanak-kanak, yang sering menjadi punca jenayah remaja, dan untuk membantu golongan muda supaya tidak jenis pilihan yang boleh menyebabkan mereka terlibat dalam tingkah laku jenayah.

untuk melaksanakan perundangan ia memerlukan perjanjian daripada masyarakat


Premise: During the Clinton years, as you may recall, there was a fight over affirmative action. And there were many people, like myself, who opposed quotas, who felt there were places where it was overreaching. So we had a policy called "Mend it, don't end it. "We fixed it.

Hypothesis: During years after the Clinton years, as you may recall, there was a fight over affirmative action

It was during the clinton years, not the years after the clinton years. I think I fooled the model with the wording.

Semasa tahun-tahun Clinton, seperti yang anda ingat, terdapat pergaduhan mengenai tindakan afirmatif. Dan terdapat ramai orang, seperti saya sendiri, yang menentang kuota, yang merasakan ada tempat di mana ia melampaui batas. Jadi kami mempunyai dasar yang dipanggil "Perbaiki, jangan tamatkannya. "Kami membetulkannya.

Selama bertahun-tahun selepas tahun-tahun Clinton, seperti yang anda ingat, terdapat pergaduhan mengenai tindakan afirmatif


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate the hon. member for Lac-Saint-Louis on his speech and I would like to ask him, following on the questions from my colleague from Saint-Bruno-Saint-Hubert, whether according to his information, he can confirm the rumours about the costs of this new firearm registration program, forecast to be in the order of $80 million, now having risen to $350 million.

Hypothesis: The costs of the new firearm registration program are rumored to have risen to over $360 million.

They were only rumored to have risen to $350 million, which is not over $360 million. It's difficult because I don't think the system understands that "over" is the same as more than, or higher than.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingin mengucapkan tahniah kepada Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Lac-Saint-Louis atas ucapannya dan saya ingin bertanya kepadanya, berikutan soalan daripada rakan sekerja saya dari Saint-Bruno-Saint-Hubert, sama ada menurut maklumatnya, dia boleh mengesahkan khabar angin tentang kos ini program pendaftaran senjata api baharu, diramalkan dalam susunan $80 juta, kini telah meningkat kepada $350 juta.

Kos program pendaftaran senjata api baharu dikhabarkan telah meningkat kepada lebih $360 juta.


Premise: "She would generally approach me after the meetings. Especially after the complaint was filed, I spoke with her a lot. She would ask me occasionally my thoughts, public comment, what I thought -- why I thought the board was doing what they were doing, those such things."

Hypothesis: She knew exactly what the higher levels were going to do

She really had no idea who was doing what

"Dia secara amnya akan mendekati saya selepas mesyuarat. Terutama selepas aduan difailkan, saya banyak bercakap dengannya. Dia kadang-kadang bertanya kepada saya fikiran saya, komen umum, apa yang saya fikir -- mengapa saya fikir lembaga itu melakukan apa yang mereka lakukan. melakukan, perkara-perkara seperti itu."

Dia tahu apa yang akan dilakukan oleh peringkat lebih tinggi


Premise: The Liberal member who just spoke is not going to support this bill and it really puzzles me why a member of the government, not just a member of the House, would stand up in this place, look the Canadian public in the eye by way of the television camera and say ``I will not support your having access to information about how we spend your tax dollars''.

Hypothesis: he is talking about a cat

Ahli Liberal yang baru bercakap itu tidak akan menyokong rang undang-undang ini dan ia benar-benar membingungkan saya mengapa seorang ahli kerajaan, bukan hanya ahli Dewan, akan berdiri di tempat ini, melihat orang ramai Kanada di mata dengan cara kamera televisyen dan katakan ``Saya tidak akan menyokong anda mempunyai akses kepada maklumat tentang cara kami membelanjakan wang cukai anda''.


Premise: If the union has recommended acceptance of this contract, and I assume then that it feels this is the best deal it can make, and the government is satisfied it is the best deal, it is fair to all concerned, does the Treasury Board president not feel that he may be endangering the ratification process by what we are doing here this evening?

Hypothesis: The contract has been accepted.

The implications of the statement is that the contract has not yet been formalized and accepted.

Sekiranya kesatuan sekerja telah mengesyorkan penerimaan kontrak ini, dan saya menganggap bahawa ia merasakan ini adalah perjanjian terbaik yang boleh dibuatnya, dan kerajaan berpuas hati bahawa ia adalah perjanjian terbaik, ia adil kepada semua yang berkenaan, adakah presiden Lembaga Perbendaharaan tidak merasakan bahawa dia mungkin membahayakan proses ratifikasi dengan apa yang kita lakukan di sini petang ini?


Premise: Instead of retreating to his ivory tower and dreaming up plans to limit the powers of Quebec's National Assembly, would the minister not be better advised to have a word with the Minister of Finance so that the next federal-provincial conference focuses on the real problem: getting the money to those who provide the services?

Hypothesis: National Assembly would hold meetings in an ivory tower.

The passage says that 'instead of going into their ivory tower' which means they don't.

Daripada berundur ke menara gadingnya dan mengimpikan rancangan untuk mengehadkan kuasa Perhimpunan Kebangsaan Quebec, adakah menteri tidak lebih baik dinasihatkan untuk bercakap dengan Menteri Kewangan supaya persidangan persekutuan-wilayah seterusnya memberi tumpuan kepada masalah sebenar: mendapatkan wang kepada mereka yang menyediakan perkhidmatan?

Dewan Negara akan mengadakan mesyuarat di menara gading.


Premise: I suppose we might as well blow another $49,249 on a cross cultural study of semiotic management and transformation of facial features in the makeup and masks of performers or $20,000 to examine the ecclesiastical courts of 19th century England or $35,000 for a study on craft industries in post-medieval Iran.

Hypothesis: I suppose we might as well blow another $49,248 on a cross cultural study of semiotic management and transformation of facial features

$49,249, not $29,248 is the number mentioned.

Saya rasa kita mungkin juga meniup $49,249 lagi untuk kajian silang budaya pengurusan semiotik dan transformasi ciri-ciri wajah dalam solek dan topeng penghibur atau $20,000 untuk memeriksa mahkamah gerejawi England abad ke-19 atau $35,000 untuk kajian tentang industri kraf dalam jawatan. -Iran zaman pertengahan.

Saya rasa kita mungkin juga meniup $49,248 lagi pada kajian silang budaya pengurusan semiotik dan transformasi ciri-ciri wajah


Premise: I would like to, of course, and I presume this administration would as well. We don't know -- there are no inspectors now in Iraq, the coalition that was in place isn't as strong as it used to be. He is a danger. We don't want him fishing in troubled waters in the Middle East. And it's going to be hard, it's going to be important to rebuild that coalition to keep the pressure on him.

Hypothesis: The author is talking about the danger of fishing in the Middle East.

The author is talking about someone being dangerous not fishing being dangerous.

Saya ingin, sudah tentu, dan saya menganggap pentadbiran ini juga. Kita tidak tahu -- tiada pemeriksa sekarang di Iraq, pakatan yang ada tidak sekuat dulu. Dia bahaya. Kami tidak mahu dia memancing di perairan bergolak di Timur Tengah. Dan ia akan menjadi sukar, ia akan menjadi penting untuk membina semula gabungan itu untuk mengekalkan tekanan ke atasnya.

Penulis bercakap tentang bahaya memancing di Timur Tengah.


Premise: The second thing that we can do is provide a fair trade playing field. This president didn't stand up for Boeing when Airbus was violating international rules and subsidies. He discovered Boeing during the course of this campaign after I'd been talking about it for months.

Hypothesis: Airbus is a victim in this whole debacle

Airbus was violating international rules and subsidies. They are not a victim

Perkara kedua yang boleh kita lakukan ialah menyediakan medan permainan perdagangan yang adil. Presiden ini tidak membela Boeing apabila Airbus melanggar peraturan dan subsidi antarabangsa. Dia menemui Boeing semasa kempen ini selepas saya bercakap mengenainya selama berbulan-bulan.

Airbus adalah mangsa dalam keseluruhan malapetaka ini


Premise: In addition, I'm going to double the number of Special Forces so that we can fight a more effective war on terror, with less pressure on the National Guard and Reserve. And what I would like to do is see the National Guard and Reserve be deployed differently here in our own country. There's much we can do with them with respect to homeland security. We ought to be doing that. And that would relieve an enormous amount of pressure.

Hypothesis: They should add 50 percent more special forces.

The statement says to double the special forces. The system was confused by the math.

Di samping itu, saya akan menggandakan bilangan Pasukan Khas supaya kita boleh memerangi perang keganasan yang lebih berkesan, dengan kurang tekanan terhadap Pengawal dan Simpanan Kebangsaan. Dan apa yang saya ingin lakukan ialah melihat Pengawal dan Simpanan Kebangsaan dikerahkan secara berbeza di sini di negara kita sendiri. Banyak yang boleh kita lakukan dengan mereka berkenaan dengan keselamatan tanah air. Kita sepatutnya berbuat demikian. Dan itu akan melegakan sejumlah besar tekanan.

Mereka harus menambah 50 peratus lagi pasukan khas.


Premise: That is speaking about as directly as I can to Motions Nos. 9 and 10. By tabling regulations in parliament and having the House of Commons or a committee subsequently pass them, we want to make sure an effective check is placed on ministers or departmental officials in terms of a bill to arbitrarily implement changes in the legislation.

Hypothesis: Ministers and officials do not have enough power, according to the speaker

The speaker wants to put more checks on the power of minister and officials.

Itu bercakap secara langsung yang saya boleh kepada Usul No. 9 dan 10. Dengan membentangkan peraturan di parlimen dan meminta Dewan Rakyat atau jawatankuasa kemudiannya meluluskannya, kami ingin memastikan semakan berkesan dibuat ke atas menteri atau pegawai jabatan. dari segi rang undang-undang untuk melaksanakan perubahan dalam perundangan secara sewenang-wenangnya.

Menteri dan pegawai tidak mempunyai kuasa yang mencukupi, menurut speaker


Premise: But I think marriage is a sacred institution. I'm going to be respectful for people who may disagree with me. I've had a record of doing so in the State of Texas. I've been a person that had been called a uniter, not a divider, because I accept other people's points of view.

Hypothesis: The speaker claims to be a "uniter, not a divider," because of his tolerance of other people's points of view who may not agree with him that marriage is outdated and should be abolished.

The speaker doesn't believe that marriage is "outdated and should be abolished," but that it's a "sacred institution," which is the part that makes this statement incorrect.

Tetapi saya fikir perkahwinan adalah institusi yang suci. Saya akan menghormati orang yang mungkin tidak bersetuju dengan saya. Saya mempunyai rekod berbuat demikian di Negeri Texas. Saya telah menjadi orang yang dipanggil penyatu, bukan pemisah, kerana saya menerima pandangan orang lain.

Penceramah itu mendakwa sebagai "penyatuan, bukan pemisah," kerana toleransinya terhadap pandangan orang lain yang mungkin tidak bersetuju dengannya bahawa perkahwinan sudah lapuk dan harus dimansuhkan.


Premise: Yes. Two of them, my oldest is at the high school, the Dover High School, and then I have -- the next one is at the Weiglestown Elementary School. And my son is hearing-impaired, so he is charged with the education of Dover School District, meaning that they have to provide his education, but he actually attends classes at a hearing-impaired classroom.

Hypothesis: Both are in high school

The narrator stated that one is in high school while the other is in elementary.

ya. Dua daripada mereka, anak sulung saya berada di sekolah menengah, Sekolah Tinggi Dover, dan kemudian saya -- yang seterusnya ialah di Sekolah Rendah Weiglestown. Dan anak saya cacat pendengaran, jadi dia didakwa dengan pendidikan Daerah Sekolah Dover, bermakna mereka perlu menyediakan pendidikannya, tetapi dia sebenarnya menghadiri kelas di bilik darjah cacat pendengaran.


Premise: I was taught -- I went to a church school and I was taught that the two greatest commandments are: Love the Lord, your God, with all your mind, your body and your soul, and love your neighbor as yourself. And frankly, I think we have a lot more loving of our neighbor to do in this country and on this planet.

Hypothesis: The narrator thinks we love our neighbors

The narrator thinks we need to love our neighbors MORE

Saya telah diajar -- saya pergi ke sekolah gereja dan saya diajar bahawa dua perintah terbesar ialah: Kasihilah Tuhan, Tuhanmu, dengan segenap akal budimu, tubuhmu dan jiwamu, dan kasihi sesamamu seperti dirimu sendiri. Dan terus terang, saya rasa kita mempunyai lebih banyak kasih sayang terhadap jiran kita untuk dilakukan di negara ini dan di planet ini.


Premise: Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment. Now, the Government has responded to petitioners' argument in a way that betrays a simple but fundamental confusion.

Hypothesis: the complex confusion was a fundamental one

The scenario states that the confusion was a simple fundamental one, not complex. The model probably wasn't sure which aspect I was referring to

Pempetisyen mengemukakan lanjutan menyeluruh syarat sedia ada yang melebihi kuasa Kongres di bawah Fasal Hak Cipta dan ia melanggar Pindaan Pertama. Kini, Kerajaan telah menjawab hujah pempetisyen dengan cara yang mengkhianati kekeliruan yang mudah tetapi asas.

kekeliruan yang kompleks adalah satu asas


Premise: Oh, yes. There were not many meetings where Bill Buckingham did not speak. And, actually, at that meeting -- I believe the beginning of the meeting was an apology, actually, which he had prepared in advance apologizing to the members of the community if he had said anything that offended them.

Hypothesis: Bill Buckingham hardly speaks in meetings and his speeches in meetings with the community always begins with an apology

the writer says Bill  speaks most time in the meeting and never said that his speech always begins with an apology, but that he believes

Oh, ya. Tidak banyak mesyuarat di mana Bill Buckingham tidak bercakap. Dan, sebenarnya, pada mesyuarat itu -- saya percaya permulaan pertemuan itu adalah permohonan maaf, sebenarnya, yang dia telah sediakan terlebih dahulu memohon maaf kepada ahli masyarakat jika dia telah berkata apa-apa yang menyinggung perasaan mereka.

Bill Buckingham jarang bercakap dalam mesyuarat dan ucapannya dalam pertemuan dengan masyarakat sentiasa dimulakan dengan permintaan maaf


Premise: One of the things I've done in Texas is I've been able to put together a good team of people. I've been able to set clear goals. The goals ought to be an education system that leaves no child behind, Medicare for our seniors, a Social Security system that's safe and secure, foreign policy that's in our nation's interest, and a strong military, and then bring people together to achieve those goals.

Hypothesis: Social Security system has a xx

Salah satu perkara yang saya lakukan di Texas ialah saya dapat mengumpulkan sekumpulan orang yang baik. Saya telah dapat menetapkan matlamat yang jelas. Matlamatnya mestilah sistem pendidikan yang tidak meninggalkan kanak-kanak, Medicare untuk warga emas kita, sistem Keselamatan Sosial yang selamat dan terjamin, dasar luar yang demi kepentingan negara kita, dan tentera yang kuat, dan kemudian membawa orang ramai untuk mencapai matlamat tersebut .


Premise: If an employee blows the whistle on some sort of wrongdoing and causes some inconvenience for the employer, discipline is actually justified in that case, especially if the employee is mistaken, even if they turned in the circumstances without any malice and with the best of intentions.

Hypothesis: discipline is actually justified in that case, especially if the employee is mistaken, unless they turned in the circumstances without any malice and with the best of intentions.

The employees should never be disciplined.

Sekiranya pekerja meniup wisel mengenai sesuatu kesalahan dan menyebabkan sedikit kesulitan kepada majikan, disiplin sebenarnya wajar dalam kes itu, terutamanya jika pekerja itu tersilap, walaupun mereka berpaling dalam keadaan tanpa sebarang niat jahat dan dengan niat yang terbaik. .

disiplin sebenarnya wajar dalam kes itu, terutamanya jika pekerja itu tersilap, melainkan mereka berpaling dalam keadaan tanpa sebarang niat jahat dan dengan niat yang terbaik.


Premise: It is unacceptable that francophones in the rest of Canada must go to court in order to gain recognition of their most essential rights, to receive an education and health care in their language, at a time when the French speaking community in Canada is more fragile than ever, as the latest census data prove.

Hypothesis: It was unacceptable that all speaking French in Canada had to go to court and was ordered to speak English for all health checks

English was never mention I wrote half truths

Adalah tidak boleh diterima bahawa francophone di seluruh Kanada mesti pergi ke mahkamah untuk mendapatkan pengiktirafan hak mereka yang paling penting, untuk menerima pendidikan dan penjagaan kesihatan dalam bahasa mereka, pada masa masyarakat berbahasa Perancis di Kanada lebih rapuh daripada pernah, seperti yang dibuktikan oleh data banci terkini.

Tidak boleh diterima bahawa semua penutur bahasa Perancis di Kanada terpaksa pergi ke mahkamah dan diperintahkan untuk berbahasa Inggeris untuk semua pemeriksaan kesihatan


Premise: If according to Bloc Quebecois policy only individuals are allowed to contribute to the financing of political parties, how can the Bloc Quebecois justify that, in 1994, candidates for the Bloc Quebecois accepted corporate donations amounting to several thousand dollars in spite of the fact that their internal regulations preclude it?

Hypothesis: Internal regulations prohibit individual donations.

The internal regulations prohibit corporate donations not individual contributions.

Jika mengikut dasar Bloc Quebecois hanya individu dibenarkan menyumbang kepada pembiayaan parti politik, bagaimana Bloc Quebecois boleh mewajarkan bahawa, pada tahun 1994, calon untuk Bloc Quebecois menerima derma korporat berjumlah beberapa ribu dolar walaupun fakta bahawa mereka peraturan dalaman menghalangnya?

Peraturan dalaman melarang derma individu.


Premise: It goes without saying that while we are building the infrastructure and building the reputation as one of the premier sporting capitals, not only nationally but internationally, part of the reason we are doing so is that we have high performance young athletes like Eric Daggett.

Hypothesis: It goes with saying.

It goes without saying, not with. The system was confused by the wording.

Tidak perlu dikatakan bahawa semasa kami membina infrastruktur dan membina reputasi sebagai salah satu ibu kota sukan utama, bukan sahaja di peringkat kebangsaan tetapi di peringkat antarabangsa, sebahagian daripada sebab kami berbuat demikian ialah kami mempunyai atlet muda berprestasi tinggi seperti Eric Daggett.


Premise: But more importantly, with respect to the question of no record, I helped write -- I did write, I was one of the original authors of the early childhood health care and the expansion of health care that we did in the middle of the 1990s. And I'm very proud of that.

Hypothesis: The speaker helped healthcare in 1990

This is false, it says the mid 1990s, not the year 1990 itself.

Tetapi yang lebih penting, berkenaan dengan persoalan tiada rekod, saya membantu menulis -- saya menulis, saya adalah salah seorang pengarang asal penjagaan kesihatan awal kanak-kanak dan pengembangan penjagaan kesihatan yang kami lakukan pada pertengahan tahun 1990-an . Dan saya sangat berbangga dengan itu.

Penceramah membantu penjagaan kesihatan pada tahun 1990


Premise: Just as we saw co-operation between the various levels of governments, the business community and the community at large to establish this park, so too will we see those types of partnerships come together to make sure that this park has both the protection of the ecosystem as well as the generation of new economic development primarily through tourism in this important area in the province of Quebec.

Hypothesis: The text is primarily talking about a lake.

It's primarily talking about a park, not a lake. It's difficult because it's talking about a broad level overview of the text and the system might not know what "primarily talking about" means exactly.

Sama seperti kita melihat kerjasama antara pelbagai peringkat kerajaan, komuniti perniagaan dan masyarakat umum untuk menubuhkan taman ini, begitu juga kita akan melihat jenis perkongsian itu bersatu untuk memastikan taman ini mempunyai kedua-dua perlindungan ekosistem serta penjanaan pembangunan ekonomi baharu terutamanya melalui pelancongan di kawasan penting di wilayah Quebec ini.

Teks ini terutamanya bercakap tentang tasik.


Premise: In connection with Uzbekistan, the applicable income tax rate applicable to dividends if the beneficial owner is a company which controls at least 10 per cent of the voting power in the company will be 5 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends, and 15 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases.

Hypothesis: If the beneficial owner is an individual who controls less than 5 percent of voting power, the applicable tax rate is 5 percent of the gross amount of the dividends

The 5% rate only applies when the owner is a company controlling at least 10% voting power. I think the system got it wrong because the context is confusingly phrased

Berhubung dengan Uzbekistan, kadar cukai pendapatan terpakai untuk dividen jika pemilik benefisial ialah syarikat yang mengawal sekurang-kurangnya 10 peratus kuasa mengundi dalam syarikat itu ialah 5 peratus daripada jumlah kasar dividen, dan 15 setiap peratus daripada jumlah kasar dividen dalam semua kes lain.

Jika pemilik benefisial adalah individu yang mengawal kurang daripada 5 peratus kuasa mengundi, kadar cukai yang dikenakan ialah 5 peratus daripada jumlah kasar dividen


Premise: Yes, it does. Take, for example, Third World debt. I think we ought to be forgiving Third World debt under certain conditions. I think, for example, if we're convinced that a Third World country that's got a lot of debt would reform itself, that the money wouldn't go into the hands of a few but would go to help people, I think it makes sense for us to use our wealth in that way, or to trade debt for valuable rain forest lands, makes that much sense, yes.

Hypothesis: Third World debt has a xx

Ya, memang begitu. Ambil, sebagai contoh, hutang Dunia Ketiga. Saya fikir kita sepatutnya memaafkan hutang Dunia Ketiga dalam keadaan tertentu. Saya fikir, sebagai contoh, jika kita yakin bahawa negara Dunia Ketiga yang mempunyai banyak hutang akan melakukan pembaharuan sendiri, bahawa wang itu tidak akan jatuh ke tangan segelintir orang tetapi akan pergi untuk membantu orang ramai, saya fikir ia menghasilkan wajar untuk kita menggunakan kekayaan kita dengan cara itu, atau untuk menukar hutang untuk tanah hutan hujan yang berharga, sangat masuk akal, ya.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, just a few days ago the grocery distributors council announced an initiative with the Canadian standards council, the industry, the provinces, the federal government and the Consumers' Association of Canada to conduct meetings and put together a criteria for voluntary labelling.

Hypothesis: More than 2 countries are mentioned in the text.

Only Canada is mentioned in the text. It's difficult because the system might not know which words correspond to countries and which don't.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, hanya beberapa hari yang lalu majlis pengedar runcit mengumumkan satu inisiatif dengan majlis piawaian Kanada, industri, wilayah, kerajaan persekutuan dan Persatuan Pengguna Kanada untuk menjalankan mesyuarat dan menyusun kriteria untuk pelabelan sukarela.

Lebih daripada 2 negara disebut dalam teks.


Premise: Honourable senators, an important topic is encapsulated by the inquiry introduced by Senator Grafstein calling our attention to the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association's delegation to the standing committee meeting of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe held in Vienna.

Hypothesis: The meeting was in Vienna Sausage.

The meeting was in Vienna not Vienna Sausage. The system was confused by the context.

Yang dihormati senator, topik penting dirangkumkan oleh siasatan yang diperkenalkan oleh Senator Grafstein yang menarik perhatian kita kepada delegasi Persatuan Parlimen Kanada-Eropah ke mesyuarat jawatankuasa tetap Perhimpunan Parlimen Pertubuhan Keselamatan dan Kerjasama di Eropah yang diadakan di Vienna.


Premise: I hope the Minister of Human Resources Development and her officials will really take note of what I said, will follow up on the issue that I raised and will amend the employment insurance program, so as to meet the needs of workers and, above all, eliminate child poverty in this country.

Hypothesis: I hope the animals of Human Resources Development and her officials will really take note of what I said

He hoped the minister is going to take note, not animals, that's just silly!

Saya berharap Menteri Pembangunan Sumber Manusia dan pegawai-pegawainya benar-benar mengambil perhatian apa yang saya katakan, akan membuat susulan terhadap isu yang saya bangkitkan dan akan meminda program insurans pekerjaan, supaya dapat memenuhi keperluan pekerja dan, terutama sekali, menghapuskan kemiskinan kanak-kanak di negara ini.

Saya harap haiwan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia dan pegawai-pegawainya akan benar-benar mengambil perhatian apa yang saya katakan


Premise: I heard the member for Mississauga South just now and earlier during question period the hon. Secretary of State for International Financial Institutions suggest that among other things the budget would somehow take 600,000 low income Canadians off the tax rolls by allegedly raising the basic personal exemption.

Hypothesis: the budget would somehow take 600,00 low income Canadians off the tax rolls

Saya mendengar ahli untuk Mississauga South tadi dan lebih awal semasa tempoh soalan hon. Setiausaha Negara bagi Institusi Kewangan Antarabangsa mencadangkan bahawa antara lain bajet itu entah bagaimana akan mengeluarkan 600,000 rakyat Kanada yang berpendapatan rendah daripada daftar cukai dengan didakwa menaikkan pengecualian peribadi asas.

bajet entah bagaimana akan mengambil 600,00 orang Kanada berpendapatan rendah daripada daftar cukai


Premise: I still believe it is very essential to once again look at what we have been able to achieve to judge where we want to go in the future and also to look at the kind of priorities and targets we can set in the forthcoming years in order to ensure that the investment and the commitment which Canadians have made over the past several years both under the UN and NATO can be fulfilled.

Hypothesis: The investment and the commitment which the Japanese have made over the past several years both under the UN and NATO can be fulfilled.

the text talks about the commitment that Canadians have made, so my statement about the Japanese making that set of commitments was definitely incorrect in that context.

Saya masih percaya adalah sangat penting untuk sekali lagi melihat apa yang telah kita capai untuk menilai ke mana kita mahu pergi pada masa hadapan dan juga untuk melihat jenis keutamaan dan sasaran yang boleh kita tetapkan pada tahun-tahun akan datang untuk memastikan bahawa pelaburan dan komitmen yang telah dibuat oleh warga Kanada sejak beberapa tahun lalu di bawah PBB dan NATO dapat dipenuhi.

Pelaburan dan komitmen yang telah dibuat oleh Jepun sejak beberapa tahun lalu di bawah PBB dan NATO dapat dipenuhi.


Premise: Mrs. Smith, my name is Richard Thompson. I represent the defendants in this case. And do you recall in April where your deposition was taken by another member of the Thomas More Law Center, Patrick Gillen? Do you remember being involved in that deposition?

Hypothesis: Mrs Smith was a defendant in a court case

using the same wording but changing mrs. smiths position in the case fooled the  AI

Puan Smith, nama saya Richard Thompson. Saya mewakili defendan dalam kes ini. Dan adakah anda masih ingat pada bulan April di mana pemendapan anda telah diambil oleh seorang lagi ahli Pusat Undang-undang Thomas More, Patrick Gillen? Adakah anda masih ingat terlibat dalam pemendapan itu?

Puan Smith adalah defendan dalam kes mahkamah


Premise: It may be that there should be consideration given to establishing a mixed claims tribunal with developed expertise in economic issues, or else to investing provincial supreme courts, which after all are permanent courts in the locality, with competence to adjudicate economic evidence on reference.

Hypothesis: Incompetence exists in supreme courts

This statement is definitely incorrect, because the context mentions that supreme courts have "competence to adjudicate." The system may not have made that connection from the context.

Mungkin ada pertimbangan yang perlu diberikan untuk menubuhkan tribunal tuntutan bercampur dengan kepakaran yang maju dalam isu ekonomi, atau sebaliknya untuk melabur mahkamah agung wilayah, yang selepas semua adalah mahkamah tetap di lokaliti, dengan kecekapan untuk mengadili bukti ekonomi berdasarkan rujukan.


Premise: We would not advance this argument, but the Government has offered an argument in a parallel case that suggests a distinction between the '76 act and this case. That's not been briefed here. It's been grounded in their claim that the treaty power creates some special power.

Hypothesis: The govenment is not being discussed

Kami tidak akan memajukan hujah ini, tetapi Kerajaan telah menawarkan hujah dalam kes selari yang mencadangkan perbezaan antara akta '76 dan kes ini. Itu belum diberi taklimat di sini. Ia telah berasaskan dakwaan mereka bahawa kuasa perjanjian mewujudkan beberapa kuasa istimewa.


Premise: We can disagree with the substance of the report, and I am prepared to debate it further, but I find it totally unacceptable that it was adopted in ten minutes, at a time when we had to be in the House to counter an unprecedented attack against the democratic rights of Quebecers.

Hypothesis: It took over 1,800 seconds to adopt the report.

1,800 seconds is 30 minutes and it only took 10 minutes to adopt the report. It's difficult because the system has trouble converting units to other units to compare the values.

Kita boleh tidak bersetuju dengan kandungan laporan itu, dan saya bersedia untuk membahaskannya dengan lebih lanjut, tetapi saya mendapati ia sama sekali tidak boleh diterima bahawa ia telah diterima pakai dalam masa sepuluh minit, pada masa kita terpaksa berada di Dewan untuk menentang serangan yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelum ini. hak demokrasi orang Quebec.

Ia mengambil masa lebih 1,800 saat untuk menerima pakai laporan itu.


Premise: That, I take it, is a harm. Their works have already been created. Harm number 2. The fact that people, for the 99 percent of the copyrights that have no commercial value after 70 years, have to find the copyright holder to put them in databases. The cost of that, on my numbers in here, made up, at least a billion dollars, or they can't find the people at all and get permission, an innumerable cost, un -- valuable cost to people who want to use it.

Hypothesis: copyrights lose value when holder turns 70

Itu, saya fikir, adalah satu kemudaratan. Karya mereka telah pun dibuat. Kemudaratan nombor 2. Hakikat bahawa orang ramai, bagi 99 peratus hak cipta yang tidak mempunyai nilai komersial selepas 70 tahun, perlu mencari pemegang hak cipta untuk meletakkannya dalam pangkalan data. Kos itu, pada nombor saya di sini, dibuat, sekurang-kurangnya satu bilion dolar, atau mereka tidak dapat mencari orang itu sama sekali dan mendapat kebenaran, kos yang tidak terkira, tidak -- kos yang berharga kepada orang yang ingin menggunakannya .

hak cipta kehilangan nilai apabila pemegangnya mencapai umur 70 tahun


Premise: So it's one of my top priorities. Now, I know that we have some disagreements on this. And I'm sorry to tell you that, you know, there is a record here. And Texas ranks 49th out of the 50 states in health care -- in children with health care. 49th for women with health care, and 50th for families with health care.

Hypothesis: Texas has the worst health care

Texas has the second-to-worst health care 49/50

Jadi ia adalah salah satu keutamaan saya. Sekarang, saya tahu bahawa kita mempunyai beberapa perselisihan faham tentang perkara ini. Dan saya minta maaf untuk memberitahu anda bahawa, anda tahu, terdapat rekod di sini. Dan Texas menduduki tempat ke-49 daripada 50 negeri dalam penjagaan kesihatan -- dalam kanak-kanak dengan penjagaan kesihatan. Ke-49 untuk wanita dengan penjagaan kesihatan, dan ke-50 untuk keluarga dengan penjagaan kesihatan.

Texas mempunyai penjagaan kesihatan yang paling teruk


Premise: But they see a compassionate, strong, great first lady in Laura Bush. I can't tell you how lucky I am. When I met her in the backyard at Joe and Jan O'Neill's in Midland, Texas, it was the classic backyard barbecue. O'Neill said, "Come on over. I think you'll find somebody who might interest you. "So I said all right. Bopped over there. There was only four of us there. And not only did she interest me, I guess you would say it was love at first sight.

Hypothesis: At the backyard barbecue he met her for fourth time and he felt love at first sight

Tetapi mereka melihat seorang wanita pertama yang penuh belas kasihan, kuat dan hebat dalam Laura Bush. Saya tidak boleh memberitahu anda betapa bertuahnya saya. Apabila saya bertemu dengannya di halaman belakang rumah Joe dan Jan O'Neill di Midland, Texas, ia adalah barbeku belakang rumah klasik. O'Neill berkata, "Mari ke sini. Saya rasa anda akan menemui seseorang yang mungkin menarik minat anda. "Jadi saya berkata baik. Bopped di sana. Hanya kami berempat di sana. Dan bukan sahaja dia menarik minat saya, saya rasa anda akan mengatakan itu cinta pandang pertama.

Di barbeku belakang rumah dia bertemu dengannya untuk kali keempat dan dia merasakan cinta pandang pertama


Premise: So I think first and foremost our power ought to be wielded to in ways that form a more perfect union. The power of example is America's greatest power in the world. And that means, for example, standing up for human rights. It means addressing the problems of injustice and inequity, along the lines of race and ethnicity here at home, because in all these other places around the world where they're having these terrible problems, when they feel hope, it is often because they see in us a reflection of their potential.

Hypothesis: America has a xx

Jadi saya fikir pertama sekali kuasa kita harus digunakan dengan cara yang membentuk kesatuan yang lebih sempurna. Kuasa teladan adalah kuasa terbesar Amerika di dunia. Dan ini bermakna, sebagai contoh, membela hak asasi manusia. Ini bermakna menangani masalah ketidakadilan dan ketidaksamaan, mengikut garis kaum dan etnik di negara ini, kerana di semua tempat lain di seluruh dunia di mana mereka menghadapi masalah yang dahsyat ini, apabila mereka berasa harapan, selalunya kerana mereka melihat dalam diri kita mencerminkan potensi mereka.


Premise: It notes that a commission of inquiry into the quality of condominium construction in B.C. has concluded that condominium owners and residents are the victims of a systemic failure to provide quality accommodation and as a result tens of thousands of residents are suffering financially, emotionally, medically and domestically.

Hypothesis: Owners are responsible for residents failures.

It says that owners and residents are victims of the system, not responsible for their own failures.

Ia menyatakan bahawa satu suruhanjaya siasatan terhadap kualiti pembinaan kondominium di B.C. telah membuat kesimpulan bahawa pemilik dan penduduk kondominium adalah mangsa kegagalan sistemik untuk menyediakan penginapan berkualiti dan akibatnya berpuluh ribu penduduk menderita dari segi kewangan, emosi, perubatan dan domestik.

Pemilik bertanggungjawab atas kegagalan penduduk.


Premise: As much as I know about the scientific community -- and, you know, you have to remember that's not my discipline. But as much as I know about what the high school science standards say, it would be in standing with that. As far as the scientific community, I really can't go there, because I know that there is a lot more about Darwin than is in that textbook. I mean, I can absolutely say that without knowing everything about Darwin or knowing everything about science.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a scientist.

The speaker clearly states that he/she is not part of the scientific community.

Setakat yang saya tahu tentang komuniti saintifik -- dan, anda tahu, anda perlu ingat itu bukan disiplin saya. Tetapi seberapa banyak yang saya tahu tentang apa yang dikatakan oleh piawaian sains sekolah tinggi, ia adalah selaras dengan itu. Setakat komuniti saintifik, saya benar-benar tidak boleh pergi ke sana, kerana saya tahu bahawa terdapat banyak lagi tentang Darwin daripada dalam buku teks itu. Maksud saya, saya benar-benar boleh mengatakan bahawa tanpa mengetahui segala-galanya tentang Darwin atau mengetahui segala-galanya tentang sains.


Premise: I want to -- obviously in the egregious cases we need to enforce civil rights law, but we need to make sure that internal affairs decisions at the local level do their job and be given a chance to do their job. I believe in local control of governments, and obviously if they don't there needs to be a consequence at the federal level.

Hypothesis: If local controls work, consequences are necessary at the federal level.

Based on what was said in the context, if local governments do NOT enforce laws properly, action will be needed at the federal level. The statement I gave says the opposite. The system may not have understood this.

Saya mahu -- jelas sekali dalam kes yang teruk kita perlu menguatkuasakan undang-undang hak sivil, tetapi kita perlu memastikan bahawa keputusan hal ehwal dalaman di peringkat tempatan menjalankan tugas mereka dan diberi peluang untuk menjalankan tugas mereka. Saya percaya kepada kawalan tempatan ke atas kerajaan, dan jelas sekali jika mereka tidak melakukannya perlu ada akibat di peringkat persekutuan.

Jika kawalan tempatan berfungsi, akibatnya perlu di peringkat persekutuan.


Premise: Modern legislation, however, frequently makes provision for the imposition of other types of fees or payment which, although not taxes in a strict sense, have enough of the characteristics of taxation to require to be treated as ``charges upon the people'' and therefore to be authorized by a Ways and Means resolution moved by a Minister of the Crown.

Hypothesis: The word "Crown" had 18 letters.

The word "Crown" had 18 letters is definitely incorrect because it only had five letters.

Perundangan moden, bagaimanapun, sering membuat peruntukan untuk mengenakan jenis fi atau pembayaran lain yang, walaupun bukan cukai dalam erti kata yang ketat, mempunyai ciri-ciri percukaian yang cukup untuk memerlukan untuk dianggap sebagai ``caj ke atas rakyat'' dan oleh itu untuk diberi kuasa melalui resolusi Cara dan Cara yang digerakkan oleh Menteri Mahkota.


Premise: Well, that's not just uniformity. It's providing incentive to people to publish here, as opposed to publish in Europe, where longer terms might be available. There is an incentive to distribute existing works that may be necessary. It's the consistency that Congress is promoting by saying to individuals, as they might have said when they enacted the Copyright Clause in the first place, we will not only give you 14 years, but if we change our mind tomorrow, and think that a better, a longer period is necessary, we're -- this is consistency, but it's also a matter of fairness, and it's --

Hypothesis: A number was mentioned in the text, and that number is larger than 15.

It's definitely incorrect because the number 14 was mentioned, which is not larger than 15. I'm not sure why this was difficult for the system.

Nah, itu bukan sekadar keseragaman. Ia memberikan insentif kepada orang ramai untuk menerbitkan di sini, berbanding menerbitkan di Eropah, di mana syarat yang lebih panjang mungkin tersedia. Terdapat insentif untuk mengedarkan karya sedia ada yang mungkin perlu. Ia adalah konsistensi yang dipromosikan oleh Kongres dengan mengatakan kepada individu, seperti yang mereka mungkin katakan semasa mereka menggubal Fasal Hak Cipta pada mulanya, kami bukan sahaja akan memberi anda 14 tahun, tetapi jika kami mengubah fikiran kami esok, dan berfikir bahawa lebih baik , tempoh yang lebih lama adalah perlu, kami -- ini adalah konsisten, tetapi ini juga soal keadilan, dan ia --

Sebilangan telah disebut dalam teks, dan nombor itu lebih besar daripada 15.


Premise: It is all a matter of definition, but we feel, and this is the mandate we received, that in order to provide service, to improve service, to invest in research and development of new products and services, to raise and to modernize the equipment that we use, for which we need capital, we should generate enough revenue, enough earnings, to provide for that at no cost to the taxpayers.

Hypothesis: In order to provide service, improve it and develop new products and services, we should not generate revenue and take money from the taxpayers.

At no cost implies that no money would be taken from the taxpayers.

Ini semua adalah masalah definisi, tetapi kami merasakan, dan ini adalah mandat yang kami terima, bahawa untuk menyediakan perkhidmatan, untuk meningkatkan perkhidmatan, untuk melabur dalam penyelidikan dan pembangunan produk dan perkhidmatan baru, untuk meningkatkan dan memodenkan peralatan. yang kita gunakan, yang kita perlukan modal, kita harus menjana hasil yang mencukupi, pendapatan yang mencukupi, untuk menyediakannya tanpa kos kepada pembayar cukai.

Untuk menyediakan perkhidmatan, menambah baik dan membangunkan produk dan perkhidmatan baharu, kita tidak seharusnya menjana pendapatan dan mengambil wang daripada pembayar cukai.


Premise: That's an interesting question. I mean, if we're not called today, which we're not going to be, I don't know that it really is an issue. We just had dialogue in chambers, the judge is going to be entering an order, and after we receive the order, we'll be able to make a decision in terms of where we proceed.

Hypothesis: The judge will enter an order for food

Itu soalan yang menarik. Maksud saya, jika kita tidak dipanggil hari ini, yang kita tidak akan menjadi, saya tidak tahu bahawa ia benar-benar satu isu. Kami baru sahaja berdialog di dalam kamar, hakim akan membuat perintah, dan selepas kami menerima perintah itu, kami akan dapat membuat keputusan dari segi ke mana kami meneruskan.

Hakim akan memasukkan pesanan untuk makanan


Premise: If he takes that position he also runs the risk that should at some point in the future his situation change so that he cannot continue to operate without some sort of temporary closure or a long term closure, he has now opened himself up for all kinds of legal liability, lawsuits and persecution in the courts.

Hypothesis: The person being discussed is extremely cautious and risk averse.

The person discussed in the passage does not sound cautious whatsoever and if he continues unchanged, he will face serious legal problems.

Jika dia mengambil kedudukan itu, dia juga menghadapi risiko yang pada masa akan datang keadaannya berubah sehingga dia tidak boleh terus beroperasi tanpa penutupan sementara atau penutupan jangka panjang, dia kini telah membuka diri untuk semua jenis liabiliti undang-undang, tindakan undang-undang dan penganiayaan di mahkamah.

Orang yang dibincangkan sangat berhati-hati dan tidak mengambil risiko.


Premise: I take this opportunity to pay my respects to my Bloc Quebecois predecessor, Laurent Lavigne, to whom I wish a well deserved rest before another referendum on Quebec's political future is called and he is again called upon to help build a country, a plan that he must not have lost sight of in his retreat in Saint-Stanislas-de-Kostka.

Hypothesis: Laurent Lavigne is half man

The passage states that Laurent Lavigne is a man.

Saya mengambil kesempatan ini untuk memberi penghormatan kepada pendahulu Bloc Quebecois saya, Laurent Lavigne, yang saya harapkan dapat berehat dengan sewajarnya sebelum satu lagi referendum mengenai masa depan politik Quebec diadakan dan beliau sekali lagi dipanggil untuk membantu membina sebuah negara, satu rancangan yang dia pasti tidak terlepas pandang semasa berundur di Saint-Stanislas-de-Kostka.


Premise: But I also believe that because we are the United States of America, we're a country with a great, unbelievable Constitution, with rights that we afford people, that you can't discriminate in the workplace. You can't discriminate in the rights that you afford people.

Hypothesis: The person is against black employment

Tetapi saya juga percaya bahawa kerana kita adalah Amerika Syarikat, kita adalah sebuah negara yang mempunyai Perlembagaan yang hebat dan sukar dipercayai, dengan hak yang kita mampu kepada orang ramai, bahawa anda tidak boleh mendiskriminasi di tempat kerja. Anda tidak boleh mendiskriminasi hak yang anda berikan kepada orang.

Orang itu menentang pekerjaan kulit hitam


Premise: Now, both of us are kind of, I guess, stating the other's position in a maximalist extreme way, but I think there is a difference here. This idea of nation building is kind of a pejorative phrase, but think about the great conflict of the past century, World War II.

Hypothesis: this text refers to the war that didn't involve germany

Sekarang, kami berdua agak, saya rasa, menyatakan kedudukan satu sama lain secara ekstrem yang maksimal, tetapi saya rasa ada perbezaan di sini. Idea pembinaan negara ini adalah semacam frasa yang merendahkan, tetapi fikirkan tentang konflik besar abad yang lalu, Perang Dunia II.

Teks ini merujuk kepada perang yang tidak melibatkan Jerman


Premise: In other words, this road leads to an unbalanced federation of racial and ethnic groups distinguished by constitutional wrangling, deadlock, regional imbalance and a fixation with unworkable linguistic and cultural policies to the neglect of weightier matters such as the environment, the economy and international competitiveness.

Hypothesis: The road mentioned is a literal road.

The road mentioned is NOT a literal road. It means a path or course to the effects mentioned.

Dalam erti kata lain, jalan ini membawa kepada persekutuan yang tidak seimbang kumpulan kaum dan etnik yang dibezakan oleh perbalahan perlembagaan, kebuntuan, ketidakseimbangan serantau dan penetapan dengan dasar linguistik dan budaya yang tidak dapat dilaksanakan sehingga mengabaikan perkara yang lebih berat seperti alam sekitar, ekonomi dan daya saing antarabangsa. .

Jalan yang disebutkan adalah jalan literal.


Premise: Nuclear weapons produce lethal levels of heat and blast, produce radiation and radioactive fallout, exterminate civilian populations, produce social disintegration, contaminate and destroy the food chain, and continue for decades after their use to induce health-related problems.

Hypothesis: peopl like nuclear weapons

Senjata nuklear menghasilkan tahap haba dan letupan yang mematikan, menghasilkan radiasi dan kejatuhan radioaktif, menghapuskan populasi awam, menghasilkan perpecahan sosial, mencemari dan memusnahkan rantaian makanan, dan berterusan selama beberapa dekad selepas digunakan untuk menimbulkan masalah berkaitan kesihatan.


Premise: I remember Casey Brown, one of the board members at the time, discussing, during the board meeting with the board, that she felt they were, I'm paraphrasing, treading, you know, on -- they were treading closely to violating the Pennsylvania State Board of Education regulations on religion in the classroom.

Hypothesis: Casey Brown was a man

Casey undermined the regulations of the Pennsylvania State Board

Saya masih ingat Casey Brown, salah seorang ahli lembaga pada masa itu, berbincang, semasa mesyuarat lembaga dengan lembaga itu, bahawa dia merasakan mereka, saya menghuraikan, menginjak, anda tahu, pada -- mereka sedang menginjak rapat untuk melanggar Peraturan Lembaga Pendidikan Negeri Pennsylvania mengenai agama di dalam bilik darjah.


Premise: The judge advocate general, the chief of the defence staff and the provost marshal are all members of the military; the members of the monitoring committee are friends of the minister; finally, the chairman of the grievance board will work in close co-operation with the chief of the defence staff.

Hypothesis: the chairman of the grievance board will work in slight co-operation with the chief of the defence staff in order to have great communications

Hakim peguam bela jeneral, ketua kakitangan pertahanan dan marshal provost adalah semua anggota tentera; ahli jawatankuasa pemantau adalah rakan menteri; akhirnya pengerusi lembaga aduan akan bekerjasama rapat dengan ketua kakitangan pertahanan.

pengerusi lembaga aduan akan bekerja dalam sedikit kerjasama dengan ketua kakitangan pertahanan untuk mempunyai komunikasi yang baik


Premise: That is why we intend to move an amendment which would ask the government to go beyond the initial motion and give some indication of whether or not the Liberals would have the fortitude on behalf of the Canadian people to not be a party to any international agreement which in future was found to compel us to export freshwater in bulk against our will.

Hypothesis: They are partaking in an agreement

They are trying to avoid partaking in an agreement

Itulah sebabnya kami berhasrat untuk menggerakkan pindaan yang akan meminta kerajaan untuk melangkaui usul awal dan memberikan beberapa petunjuk sama ada Liberal akan mempunyai ketabahan bagi pihak rakyat Kanada untuk tidak menjadi pihak kepada mana-mana perjanjian antarabangsa yang pada masa hadapan didapati memaksa kami untuk mengeksport air tawar secara pukal di luar kehendak kami.

Mereka mengambil bahagian dalam perjanjian


Premise: In the non-military area of influencing events around the world, the financial and economic are, the World Bank President Wilfinson said recently, Governor, that U.S. contributions to overseas development assistance is lower now almost than it has ever been. Is that a problem for you? Do you think -- what is your -- what is your idea about what the United States' obligations are? I'm talking about financial assistance and that sort of thing to other countries, the poor countries.

Hypothesis: President Wilfinson has a q

Dalam bidang bukan ketenteraan yang mempengaruhi peristiwa di seluruh dunia, kewangan dan ekonomi, Presiden Bank Dunia Wilfinson berkata baru-baru ini, Gabenor, bahawa sumbangan A.S. kepada bantuan pembangunan luar negara kini lebih rendah hampir berbanding sebelum ini. Adakah itu masalah untuk anda? Adakah anda fikir -- apakah anda -- apakah idea anda tentang kewajipan Amerika Syarikat? Saya bercakap tentang bantuan kewangan dan perkara semacam itu kepada negara lain, negara miskin.


Premise: And I think that's where maybe the vice president and I begin to have some differences. I'm worried about overcommitting our military around the world. I want to be judicious in its use. You mentioned Haiti. I wouldn't have sent troops to Haiti. I didn't think it was a mission worthwhile.

Hypothesis: the speaker wants to spread out the troops

The speaker is talking about more isolationist policies including not overcommitting the military in world operations. This is the opposite of wanting to 'spread out the troops'. The model probably isn't sure if speaker refers to the person talking or the person being talked about

Dan saya fikir di situlah mungkin naib presiden dan saya mula mempunyai beberapa perbezaan. Saya bimbang untuk melebih-lebihkan tentera kita di seluruh dunia. Saya mahu menjadi bijak dalam penggunaannya. Anda menyebut Haiti. Saya tidak akan menghantar tentera ke Haiti. Saya tidak fikir ia adalah misi yang berbaloi.


Premise: In the speech he gave when he introduced the bill-I do not remember the date-he said that ``Where a province adopts substantially similar legislation, the organizations covered by the provincial legislation will be exempted from the application of the federal law within that jurisdiction.

Hypothesis: The speech about the legislation and bill that he had made had mentioned him able to remember the date. He also spoke of the organisations that would be exempt under the provincial legislation

Dalam ucapannya ketika memperkenalkan rang undang-undang itu-Saya tidak ingat tarikhnya-beliau berkata bahawa ``Jika wilayah menerima pakai undang-undang yang hampir sama, organisasi yang diliputi oleh perundangan wilayah akan dikecualikan daripada pemakaian undang-undang persekutuan dalam tempoh itu. bidang kuasa.

Ucapan mengenai perundangan dan rang undang-undang yang dibuatnya telah menyebut bahawa dia dapat mengingati tarikh tersebut. Beliau juga bercakap tentang organisasi yang akan dikecualikan di bawah undang-undang wilayah


Premise: What he's suggesting, we're going to cut benefits or we're going to have to raise the retirement age. We may have to take some other reform. But if you've just said, you've promised no changes, does that mean you're just going to leave this as a problem, another problem for our children to solve?

Hypothesis: retirement age contains a q

Apa yang dia cadangkan, kita akan potong faedah atau kita kena naikkan umur persaraan. Kita mungkin perlu melakukan reformasi lain. Tetapi jika anda baru berkata, anda telah berjanji tiada perubahan, adakah itu bermakna anda hanya akan membiarkan ini sebagai masalah, satu lagi masalah untuk anak-anak kita selesaikan?


Premise: People who fly on airplanes today, the cargo hold is not X-rayed, but the baggage is. That's not good enough. Firehouses don't have enough firefighters in them. Police officers are being cut from the streets of America because the president decided to cut the COPS program.

Hypothesis: The COPS program caused police officers to lose their jobs.

The context shows that the loss of the COPS program was keeping jobs, not cutting them. The system may have been confused by multiple instances of the word cut.

Orang yang terbang di atas kapal terbang hari ini, pegangan kargo tidak X-rayed, tetapi bagasi itu. Itu tidak cukup baik. Firehouses tidak mempunyai anggota bomba yang mencukupi di dalamnya. Pegawai polis dipotong dari jalan -jalan di Amerika kerana presiden memutuskan untuk memotong program polis.

Program COPS menyebabkan pegawai polis kehilangan pekerjaan.


Premise: All of these variations are quintessentially legislative judgments. It would be very difficult for the Framers to have eschewed deciding 14 years was a constitutional limitation, and for this Court to say 99 years is, and again, even the petitioners aren't asking the Court to make that judgment.

Hypothesis: The variations are quintessentially judgments for the petitioners.

The text says "All of these variations are quintessentially legislative judgments", so legislators, not petitioners. The sentence is confusing to me and the model.

Kesemua variasi ini secara asasnya adalah penghakiman perundangan. Adalah sangat sukar bagi Penggubal untuk mengelak memutuskan 14 tahun adalah had perlembagaan, dan bagi Mahkamah ini untuk mengatakan 99 tahun adalah, dan sekali lagi, walaupun pempetisyen tidak meminta Mahkamah membuat penghakiman itu.

Variasi ini pada dasarnya adalah penghakiman untuk pempetisyen.


Premise: It will be a huge down payment for a pretty darn good system. If you allow -- also allow -- convince states to -- allow states to allow the mother to match some of the children's health insurance money with it, the pool purchasing power. And to make health care more affordable, allow business associations like the National Federal of Independent Business or the Chamber of Commerce or the National Restaurant Association to write association plans across jurisdictional lines so that small businesses have got the capacity to have national pooling to drive the cost of insurance down.

Hypothesis: National Federal of Independent Business is the same thing as the Chamber of Commerce or the National Restaurant Association

They are different business associations

Ia akan menjadi bayaran muka yang besar untuk sistem yang sangat bagus. Jika anda membenarkan -- juga membenarkan -- meyakinkan negeri-negeri untuk -- membenarkan negeri membenarkan ibu memadankan beberapa wang insurans kesihatan anak-anak dengannya, kuasa beli kumpulan. Dan untuk menjadikan penjagaan kesihatan lebih berpatutan, benarkan persatuan perniagaan seperti Persekutuan Perniagaan Bebas Kebangsaan atau Dewan Perniagaan atau Persatuan Restoran Kebangsaan menulis rancangan persatuan merentas bidang kuasa supaya perniagaan kecil mempunyai keupayaan untuk mempunyai pengumpulan nasional untuk memacu kos insurans turun.

Persekutuan Perniagaan Bebas Kebangsaan adalah perkara yang sama seperti Dewan Perniagaan atau Persatuan Restoran Kebangsaan


Premise: Honourable senators, on November 16, the Honourable Jean-Maurice Simard called the attention of the Senate to the current situation vis--vis the development and vitality of francophone and Acadian communities, its gradual deterioration, the growing indifference of governments over the past ten years, and the lack of access to services in French.

Hypothesis: Simard was not negative about the government.

Simard pointed out the growing indifference of governments, which is negative. The general term "negative" fooled the model, since it is subjective.

Yang Berhormat senator, pada 16 November, Yang Berhormat Jean-Maurice Simard memanggil perhatian Senat kepada situasi semasa berhubung dengan pembangunan dan daya hidup masyarakat francophone dan Acadian, kemerosotannya secara beransur-ansur, sikap acuh tak acuh yang semakin meningkat dalam tempoh sepuluh yang lalu. tahun, dan kekurangan akses kepada perkhidmatan dalam bahasa Perancis.

Simard tidak bersikap negatif terhadap kerajaan.


Premise: But let me go a step further. We have a long distance yet to travel in terms of fairness in America. I don't know how you can govern in this country when you look at New York City and you see that 50 percent of the black males there are unemployed, when you see 40 percent of Hispanic children -- of black children in some cities -- dropping out of high school.

Hypothesis: The unemployment rate is more than half of the black male population for black males

The percentage rate is only half according to the text not more than half

Tetapi biarlah saya melangkah lebih jauh. Kami mempunyai jarak yang jauh lagi untuk mengembara dari segi keadilan di Amerika. Saya tidak tahu bagaimana anda boleh mentadbir negara ini apabila anda melihat New York City dan anda melihat bahawa 50 peratus daripada lelaki kulit hitam di sana menganggur, apabila anda melihat 40 peratus kanak-kanak Hispanik -- kanak-kanak kulit hitam di beberapa bandar - - berhenti sekolah menengah.

Kadar pengangguran adalah lebih separuh daripada populasi lelaki kulit hitam untuk lelaki kulit hitam


Premise: And so in order to take pressure off the borders, in order to make the borders more secure, I believe there ought to be a temporary worker card that allows a willing worker and a willing employer to mate up, so long as there's not an American willing to do that job, to join up in order to be able to fulfill the employers' needs.

Hypothesis: temporary worker card has a x

Oleh itu, untuk mengurangkan tekanan dari sempadan, untuk menjadikan sempadan lebih selamat, saya percaya perlu ada kad pekerja sementara yang membenarkan pekerja yang bersedia dan majikan yang bersedia untuk berkahwin, selagi tidak ada orang Amerika. sanggup melakukan kerja itu, untuk menyertai supaya dapat memenuhi keperluan majikan.


Premise: Honourable senators, may I ask the Leader of the Government in the Senate whether he will take the occasion of a debate, which is now adjourned in the name of Senator Bryden, on the report of the Special Senate Committee on the Cape Breton Development Corporation to make a full statement to the Senate within the next few days?

Hypothesis: The senators are being asked for a bill to be passed in the next few days

The senators are being asked for a full statement not a bill.

Yang dihormati senator, boleh saya bertanya kepada Pemimpin Kerajaan di Dewan Negara sama ada beliau akan mengambil kesempatan perbahasan, yang kini ditangguhkan atas nama Senator Bryden, mengenai laporan Jawatankuasa Senat Khas mengenai Perbadanan Pembangunan Cape Breton kepada membuat kenyataan penuh kepada Dewan Negara dalam beberapa hari akan datang?

Para senator diminta supaya rang undang-undang diluluskan dalam beberapa hari akan datang


Premise: I hope that the House will come up with an amendment to clause 9 because as it stands now, if we have final offer selection on top of it, it would amount to telling the arbitrator or the arbitration panel ``Now you are going to manage this whole thing, and look at it as if it were a private company, a totally private firm, and at the same time you will be looking for the best way to settle the dispute''.

Hypothesis: The person is interested in clause 9 as it is now

This statement is definitely incorrect, because in the first sentence, they state that they are looking for an amendment to the clause.

Saya berharap Dewan akan membuat pindaan kepada fasal 9 kerana seperti yang ada sekarang, jika kita mempunyai pilihan tawaran akhir di atasnya, ia akan sama dengan memberitahu penimbang tara atau panel timbang tara ``Sekarang anda akan menguruskan semua perkara ini, dan lihatlah ia seolah-olah ia sebuah syarikat persendirian, firma swasta sepenuhnya, dan pada masa yang sama anda akan mencari cara terbaik untuk menyelesaikan pertikaian itu''.

Orang itu berminat dengan fasal 9 seperti sekarang


Premise: Well, because, like I said, my husband had been a teacher at the school, and he had sort of been directed by the high school principal to attend the meeting in support of the different things that were happening. There were other textbooks that were being adopted and controversies over them, and, you know, it was sort of a rallying thing, I suppose. And I went along because I live in the district, I pay taxes in the district, my children attend school in the district. I'm an educator, and I was curious about what was happening.

Hypothesis: My children have all graduated.

It says that my children attend school in the district, so they couldn't have all graduated.

Baiklah, kerana, seperti yang saya katakan, suami saya pernah menjadi guru di sekolah itu, dan dia telah diarahkan oleh pengetua sekolah menengah untuk menghadiri mesyuarat itu bagi menyokong pelbagai perkara yang berlaku. Terdapat buku teks lain yang diterima pakai dan kontroversi mengenainya, dan, anda tahu, ia adalah sejenis perkara yang menarik, saya rasa. Dan saya ikut kerana saya tinggal di daerah, saya membayar cukai di daerah, anak saya bersekolah di daerah. Saya seorang pendidik, dan saya ingin tahu tentang apa yang berlaku.

Anak-anak saya semua sudah tamat pengajian.


Premise: That is, that the Copyright Clause justifies the extension for works not yet created, but it would be enormously inequitable to have other authors who put in the same amount of work get a lesser protection, so the Necessary and Proper Clause now allows you to do the 24 retrospective?

Hypothesis: Copyright Clause has a q

Iaitu, Klausa Hak Cipta mewajarkan pelanjutan untuk karya yang belum dibuat, tetapi adalah sangat tidak adil jika pengarang lain yang membuat jumlah kerja yang sama mendapat perlindungan yang lebih rendah, jadi Klausa Perlu dan Wajar kini membenarkan anda melakukannya retrospektif 24?


Premise: I believe that history will show after the vote is taken in the House of Commons, that those who for whatever reason vote against this treaty will in 25 or 30 years from now be judged by the Canadian people, that while their opinions may have been right or wrong, they were on the wrong side in opposing this treaty.

Hypothesis: The vote for the treaty is between 25 and 30 years old.

In the context of the prompt, the vote is happening right now, not between 25 and 30 years in the past.

Saya percaya bahawa sejarah akan menunjukkan selepas undian diambil di Dewan Rakyat, bahawa mereka yang atas sebab apa pun mengundi menentang perjanjian ini akan dalam 25 atau 30 tahun dari sekarang dihakimi oleh rakyat Kanada, walaupun pendapat mereka mungkin betul. atau salah, mereka berada di pihak yang salah dalam menentang perjanjian ini.

Undi untuk perjanjian itu adalah antara 25 dan 30 tahun.