Premise: What the heck. I -- of course there's a lot -- look, global warming needs to be taken very seriously, and I take it seriously. But science, there's a lot -- there's differing opinions. And before we react, I think it's best to have the full accounting, full understanding of what's taking place.

Hypothesis: global warming is the least important topic in politics right now

We do not know what is considered important or not. There could many other topics more important that global warming

apa kejadahnya. Saya -- sudah tentu ada banyak -- lihat, pemanasan global perlu dipandang serius, dan saya mengambilnya dengan serius. Tetapi sains, terdapat banyak -- terdapat pendapat yang berbeza. Dan sebelum kita bertindak balas, saya fikir lebih baik untuk mempunyai perakaunan penuh, pemahaman penuh tentang apa yang berlaku.

pemanasan global adalah topik yang paling kurang penting dalam politik sekarang


Premise: Mr. Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to speak to the motions in Group No. 6 of Bill C-19. I am sure my hardworking colleague from the official opposition, the critic for the labour file and the member for Wetaskiwin, recognizes this is a very important bill and a very positive step in amending the Canada Labour Code.

Hypothesis: The critic is an AI.

No information was provided about whether the critic was human.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, terima kasih atas peluang untuk bercakap dengan usul dalam Kumpulan No. 6 RUU C-19. Saya pasti rakan sekerja saya yang bekerja keras daripada pembangkang rasmi, pengkritik fail buruh dan ahli untuk Wetaskiwin, mengakui ini adalah rang undang-undang yang sangat penting dan langkah yang sangat positif dalam meminda Kod Buruh Kanada.


Premise: The act provides that it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death, or in cases where the accused has already been found guilty of an offence related to the death.

Hypothesis: The accused will be found innocent.

"The accused will be found innocent" is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect because the context applies to many cases, not just one so in some cases the accused will be found innocent, and in others they will be found guilty so it will be on a case by case bsis. I think this was difficult for the system because it applied to a future & repeated events.

Akta itu memperuntukkan bahawa adalah perlu untuk mendapatkan persetujuan peguam negara sebelum memulakan prosiding berkenaan dengan kesalahan apabila didakwa bahawa kecederaan yang menyebabkan kematian dialami lebih daripada tiga tahun sebelum kematian, atau dalam kes di mana tertuduh telah pun didapati bersalah atas kesalahan berkaitan kematian.


Premise: For 14 long years, the bargaining relationship between the alliance and Treasury Board for the workers represented at Table 2 has been frustrated by government interventions that have been designed to control, restrain and freeze wages, erode employment security and, yes, even renege on signing collective agreements.

Hypothesis: the sky is blue

Selama 14 tahun yang panjang, hubungan tawar-menawar antara perikatan dan Lembaga Perbendaharaan untuk pekerja yang diwakili di Jadual 2 telah dikecewakan oleh campur tangan kerajaan yang telah direka untuk mengawal, menyekat dan membekukan gaji, menghakis keselamatan pekerjaan dan, ya, malah mengingkari tandatangan. perjanjian kolektif.


Premise: The sense is that if we partner together effectively, if we build a relationship with First Nations and ask for their input and advice on taking the recommendations of the royal commission and building a plan of action together, engaging the provinces and the private sector, including Canadians in that process, we will find the solutions we need to ensure that aboriginal people are able to benefit from the wealth and prosperity of Canada.

Hypothesis: The capital of Canada starts with the letter "D".

Nothing in the context specifies what the name of the capital is, so we don't know for sure without using external knowledge. I don't know why this was hard, except maybe for the fact that Canada contains the letter D, which confused the system.

Maksudnya ialah jika kita bekerjasama secara berkesan, jika kita membina hubungan dengan Negara-Negara Pertama dan meminta input dan nasihat mereka untuk mengambil cadangan suruhanjaya diraja dan membina pelan tindakan bersama, melibatkan wilayah dan sektor swasta, termasuk Orang Kanada dalam proses itu, kami akan mencari penyelesaian yang kami perlukan untuk memastikan orang asli dapat mendapat manfaat daripada kekayaan dan kemakmuran Kanada.

Ibu kota Kanada bermula dengan huruf "D".


Premise: I think it's important to promote a culture of life. I think a hospitable society is a society where every being counts and every person matters. I believe the ideal world is one in which every child is protected in law and welcomed to life. I understand there's great differences on this issue of abortion, but I believe reasonable people can come together and put good law in place that will help reduce the number of abortions.

Hypothesis: Every child will be protected regardless of any situation. There will be consequences under different matters.

Putting there will be consequences without a time frame can make it seem incorrect but for the reason it doesn't have a time is why it's not correct or incorrect.

Saya fikir adalah penting untuk mempromosikan budaya hidup. Saya fikir masyarakat yang mesra adalah masyarakat di mana setiap makhluk dikira dan setiap orang penting. Saya percaya dunia yang ideal ialah dunia di mana setiap kanak-kanak dilindungi undang-undang dan dialu-alukan untuk hidup. Saya faham terdapat perbezaan besar dalam isu pengguguran ini, tetapi saya percaya orang yang munasabah boleh berkumpul dan melaksanakan undang-undang yang baik yang akan membantu mengurangkan bilangan pengguguran.

Setiap kanak-kanak akan dilindungi tanpa mengira apa jua keadaan. Akan ada akibat di bawah perkara yang berbeza.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, on Friday, in reply to a question, the Minister of Canadian Heritage said in this House that the Americans had made a written commitment not to react to her subsidy program for Canadian publishers who, as we know, are the big losers in the agreement reached regarding Bill C-55.

Hypothesis: Canadian publishers and the Minister of Canadian Heritage are working together.

There is nothing in the statement indicating if the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Canadian publishers are working together. Therefore it is neither correct or incorrect.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, pada hari Jumaat, dalam menjawab soalan, Menteri Warisan Kanada berkata di Dewan ini bahawa Amerika telah membuat komitmen bertulis untuk tidak bertindak balas terhadap program subsidinya untuk penerbit Kanada yang, seperti yang kita tahu, adalah yang rugi besar. dalam perjanjian yang dicapai mengenai Rang Undang-Undang C-55.

Penerbit Kanada dan Menteri Warisan Kanada bekerjasama.


Premise: But let me go a step further. We have a long distance yet to travel in terms of fairness in America. I don't know how you can govern in this country when you look at New York City and you see that 50 percent of the black males there are unemployed, when you see 40 percent of Hispanic children -- of black children in some cities -- dropping out of high school.

Hypothesis: New York City hispanic children look at governing fairness in high school.

We can't know that some Hispanic children in NYC don't look at governing fairness.

Tetapi biarlah saya melangkah lebih jauh. Kami mempunyai jarak yang jauh lagi untuk mengembara dari segi keadilan di Amerika. Saya tidak tahu bagaimana anda boleh mentadbir negara ini apabila anda melihat New York City dan anda melihat bahawa 50 peratus daripada lelaki kulit hitam di sana menganggur, apabila anda melihat 40 peratus kanak-kanak Hispanik -- kanak-kanak kulit hitam di beberapa bandar - - berhenti sekolah menengah.

Kanak-kanak hispanik New York City melihat kepada keadilan yang mentadbir di sekolah menengah.


Premise: No child should be left behind in America. I want to make sure we rebuild our military to keep the peace. I worry about morale in today's military. The warning signs are clear. It is time to have a new commander in chief who will rebuild the military, pay our men and women more, make sure they're housed better and have a focused mission for our military.

Hypothesis: Men and women in the military have substandard housing.

Tiada kanak-kanak harus ditinggalkan di Amerika. Saya mahu memastikan kita membina semula tentera kita untuk menjaga keamanan. Saya bimbang tentang semangat dalam tentera hari ini. Tanda-tanda amaran adalah jelas. Sudah tiba masanya untuk mempunyai ketua komander baharu yang akan membina semula tentera, membayar lelaki dan wanita kita lebih banyak, memastikan mereka ditempatkan lebih baik dan mempunyai misi tertumpu untuk tentera kita.

Lelaki dan wanita dalam tentera mempunyai perumahan yang tidak berkualiti.


Premise: We've come, gentlemen, to our last question. And it occurred to me as I came to this debate tonight that the three of us share something. All three of us are surrounded by very strong women. We're all married to strong women. Each of us have two daughters that make us very proud.

Hypothesis: The speaker is fictional.

There is no way to determine from this if the speaker is real or is taken from a story. It could be either.

Kami datang, tuan-tuan, kepada soalan terakhir kami. Dan saya terfikir ketika saya datang ke perdebatan malam ini bahawa kami bertiga berkongsi sesuatu. Kami bertiga dikelilingi oleh wanita yang sangat kuat. Kami semua berkahwin dengan wanita yang kuat. Setiap daripada kami mempunyai dua anak perempuan yang sangat membanggakan kami.


Premise: Yes. Bill Buckingham said to her -- and I know Bill Buckingham because at the time he lived down the street from my grandparents and for many years lived there. And he responded to her basically saying that there's, you know, a problem with the textbook, it needs to be balanced, comments about laced with Darwinism, it needed to be balanced with creationism. Comments of that nature is what he had said to her.

Hypothesis: Bill Buckingham believes in creationism.

One can infer that Buckingham believed in creationism due to his desire for textbooks to include it alongside Darwinism, but this alone is not solid proof that he believes in creationism.

ya. Bill Buckingham berkata kepadanya -- dan saya mengenali Bill Buckingham kerana pada masa itu dia tinggal di tepi jalan dari datuk dan nenek saya dan selama bertahun-tahun tinggal di sana. Dan dia menjawabnya pada dasarnya mengatakan bahawa terdapat, anda tahu, masalah dengan buku teks, ia perlu seimbang, komen tentang dicampur dengan Darwinisme, ia perlu diseimbangkan dengan penciptaan. Komen seperti itu adalah apa yang dia katakan kepadanya.

Bill Buckingham percaya kepada penciptaan.


Premise: That's got to mean something, and if it means that we are limited in our ability to agree with the Europeans as they continually expand the term in light of their own vision of what copyright is about, then that's the meaning of a constitutional restriction.

Hypothesis: The EU and US share simliar copyright laws

Itu mesti bermakna sesuatu, dan jika ini bermakna kita terhad dalam keupayaan untuk bersetuju dengan orang Eropah kerana mereka terus mengembangkan istilah itu berdasarkan wawasan mereka sendiri tentang apa itu hak cipta, maka itulah maksud sekatan perlembagaan.

EU dan AS berkongsi undang-undang hak cipta yang serupa


Premise: I think the administration did the right thing in that case. I do. It was a horrible situation, no one liked to see it on our TV screens, but it's a case where we need to make sure we have an early warning system in place in places where there could be ethnic cleansing and genocide the way we saw it there in Rwanda.

Hypothesis: There was killing shown on the TV screens

There is no mention of what was actually shown on the TV screen.  It very well may or may not be killing.

Saya fikir pentadbiran telah melakukan perkara yang betul dalam kes itu. Saya sudi. Ia adalah situasi yang mengerikan, tiada siapa yang suka melihatnya di skrin TV kami, tetapi ini adalah kes di mana kami perlu memastikan kami mempunyai sistem amaran awal di tempat yang mungkin berlaku pembersihan etnik dan pembunuhan beramai-ramai seperti yang kami lihat. ada di Rwanda.

Terdapat pembunuhan yang ditunjukkan di kaca TV


Premise: For example, in some jurisdictions the police may provide a card to all victims they come into contact with which refers victims to victim witness services and/or which refers to the victim impact statement program, or the crown may have a notation in the file that the victim has indeed been advised.

Hypothesis: the police don't not tell the victims "It's going to be OK"

I have used a double negative which fooled the AI. The police never say one way or another if they tell the victim everything will be OK.

Sebagai contoh, dalam sesetengah bidang kuasa polis boleh memberikan kad kepada semua mangsa yang mereka hubungi yang merujuk mangsa kepada perkhidmatan saksi mangsa dan/atau yang merujuk kepada program kenyataan kesan mangsa, atau mahkota mungkin mempunyai notasi dalam fail yang mangsa memang telah dinasihatkan.

polis tidak memberitahu mangsa "Ia akan baik-baik saja"


Premise: The president decided to give it to the wealthiest Americans in a tax cut. Now, Alan Greenspan, who I think has done a terrific job in monetary policy, supports the president's tax cut. I don't. I support it for the middle class, not that part of it that goes to people earning more than $200,000 a year.

Hypothesis: Middle Class can make near $200,000 a year and still be considered middle class.

This is hard to say if it's correct or not, as it doesn't very well know how close the middle class would need to be before leaving the middle class bracket. Everyone has different perceptions and opinions in this area, which is why it confused the system.

Presiden memutuskan untuk memberikannya kepada orang terkaya Amerika dalam pemotongan cukai. Kini, Alan Greenspan, yang saya fikir telah melakukan kerja yang hebat dalam dasar monetari, menyokong pemotongan cukai presiden. Saya tidak. Saya menyokongnya untuk kelas pertengahan, bukan sebahagian daripadanya yang diberikan kepada orang yang berpendapatan lebih daripada $200,000 setahun.

Kelas Menengah boleh membuat dalam $200,000 setahun dan masih dianggap kelas pertengahan.


Premise: The Government has argued as if petitioners had advanced a general theory of the Copyright Clause, or a general constraint under which Congress must operate. That is a mistake. This case is about limits to an enumerated power. It's not about general power of Congress to exercise its copyright authority.

Hypothesis: The Government has made a law against the person bill

Kerajaan telah berhujah seolah-olah pempetisyen telah mengemukakan teori umum Fasal Hak Cipta, atau kekangan umum di mana Kongres mesti beroperasi. Itu adalah satu kesilapan. Kes ini adalah mengenai had kepada kuasa yang disebutkan. Ia bukan mengenai kuasa umum Kongres untuk menggunakan kuasa hak ciptanya.

Kerajaan telah membuat undang-undang terhadap rang undang-undang orang


Premise: Yet, the Liberals' instinct to meddle in everything is so strong and their condescending, paternalistic, interventionist, big brother attitude is so pronounced that they continue to get involved in areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction, in spite of the resulting damage to Canadian unity.

Hypothesis: the liberals have extreme paternal instincts

they are paternalistic, not paternal instincts, these are not the same thing! I think the system assumed they were because they are spelled the same.

Namun, naluri Liberal untuk mencampuri segala-galanya begitu kuat dan sikap merendahkan, paternalistik, campur tangan, abang besar mereka begitu ketara sehingga mereka terus melibatkan diri dalam bidang kuasa wilayah eksklusif, walaupun mengakibatkan kerosakan kepada perpaduan Kanada.

golongan liberal mempunyai naluri kebapaan yang melampau


Premise: Recently Quebec agricultural producers, processors, and distributors, as well as the UPA and MAPAQ, came up with an initial proposal: with the OECD showing more flexibility, the United States taking a tougher stance, and little give from Asia, Japan and Europe, the UPA is calling for the status quo.

Hypothesis: The OECD is delighted

nobody knows the emotions of the OECD but this assumes that they are not happy.

Baru-baru ini pengeluar, pemproses dan pengedar pertanian Quebec, serta UPA dan MAPAQ, telah mengemukakan cadangan awal: dengan OECD menunjukkan lebih fleksibiliti, Amerika Syarikat mengambil sikap yang lebih tegas, dan sedikit pemberian daripada Asia, Jepun dan Eropah, UPA menyeru kepada status quo.


Premise: Surely the member would admit that we should not prejudge the inquiry and that there were some students or even non-students who were members of groups such as the International Socialist Workers Party and other radical organizations who were clearly there to disrupt the summit, posing a security threat and tearing down a security wall separating them from heads of states.

Hypothesis: Socialists are disruptive.

The socialists in this case were definitely disruptive. This does not mean that every single socialist is a disruptive person.

Sudah tentu ahli itu akan mengakui bahawa kita tidak sepatutnya meramalkan siasatan itu dan terdapat beberapa pelajar atau bukan pelajar yang menjadi ahli kumpulan seperti Parti Pekerja Sosialis Antarabangsa dan organisasi radikal lain yang jelas berada di sana untuk mengganggu sidang kemuncak itu, menimbulkan ancaman keselamatan dan meruntuhkan tembok keselamatan yang memisahkan mereka daripada ketua negara.


Premise: The statements I make or the statements that I do not make in my classroom tell my students something. So I think we're charged with, you know, having an ethical decision to make when we walk into the classroom, the things that we say and the things that we do, and so I think that's very important.

Hypothesis: The students did not listen to this

There's no way to know whether or not the students listened to this statement, therefor making it neither correct or incorrect. I think the model stuggled because there really is no way to know.

Kenyataan yang saya buat atau kenyataan yang saya tidak buat di dalam bilik darjah saya memberitahu pelajar saya sesuatu. Jadi saya rasa kita didakwa, anda tahu, mempunyai keputusan beretika yang perlu dibuat apabila kita masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, perkara yang kita perkatakan dan perkara yang kita lakukan, jadi saya fikir itu sangat penting.


Premise: Senators Joyal and De Ban know that, when Prime Minister Trudeau, thinking he had detected agreement among the provinces, even though Quebec was not a party, said that if he could get the support of the provinces and the members, he would not let the Senate prevent him from concluding an agreement.

Hypothesis: the members of the provinces support Senate in concluding on the agreement for Trudeau.

It's not known one way or the other how the members of the provinces feel about Trudeau, but the system found it difficult to determine and felt it was incorrect.

Senator Joyal dan De Ban tahu bahawa, apabila Perdana Menteri Trudeau, memikirkan dia telah mengesan persetujuan di antara wilayah, walaupun Quebec bukan sebuah parti, berkata bahawa jika dia boleh mendapatkan sokongan wilayah dan ahli, dia tidak akan membiarkan Senat menghalangnya daripada membuat perjanjian.

ahli-ahli wilayah menyokong Senat dalam membuat kesimpulan mengenai perjanjian untuk Trudeau.


Premise: It's one of the reasons I'm a strong believer in what they call health savings accounts. These are accounts that allow somebody to buy a low-premium, high-deductible catastrophic plan and couple it with tax-free savings. Businesses can contribute, employees can contribute on a contractual basis. But this is a way to make sure people are actually involved with the decision-making process on health care.

Hypothesis: This is a presidential debate

Ini adalah salah satu sebab saya sangat percaya dengan apa yang mereka panggil akaun simpanan kesihatan. Ini adalah akaun yang membenarkan seseorang membeli pelan bencana premium rendah, boleh ditolak tinggi dan menggabungkannya dengan penjimatan tanpa cukai. Perniagaan boleh menyumbang, pekerja boleh menyumbang secara kontrak. Tetapi ini adalah cara untuk memastikan orang ramai benar-benar terlibat dengan proses membuat keputusan mengenai penjagaan kesihatan.


Premise: I would. Now, but here is why it's directly relevant, Jim. Because by his own budget numbers, his proposals for spending on tax cuts for the wealthiest of the wealthy are more than the new spending proposals that he has made for health care and education and national defense all combined.

Hypothesis: The budget proposed was very small

There is a very large population who are very wealthy

Saya akan. Sekarang, tetapi inilah sebabnya ia berkaitan secara langsung, Jim. Kerana mengikut angka belanjawannya sendiri, cadangan beliau untuk membelanjakan pemotongan cukai untuk golongan terkaya di antara golongan kaya adalah lebih daripada cadangan perbelanjaan baharu yang telah beliau buat untuk penjagaan kesihatan dan pendidikan serta pertahanan negara yang digabungkan.


Premise: The question before federal and provincial finance ministers, when they met on this subject last February, was would they simply continue to let the actuarially unfunded liability increase, or would they finally begin to deal with it, recognizing that the $600 billion would become $700 billion within a few short years.

Hypothesis: This is from the twenty first century

Persoalan di hadapan menteri kewangan persekutuan dan wilayah, apabila mereka bertemu mengenai perkara ini pada Februari lalu, adakah mereka akan terus membiarkan liabiliti aktuari tidak dibiayai meningkat, atau adakah mereka akhirnya mula menanganinya, menyedari bahawa $600 bilion akan menjadi $700 bilion dalam masa beberapa tahun yang singkat.


Premise: If he takes that position he also runs the risk that should at some point in the future his situation change so that he cannot continue to operate without some sort of temporary closure or a long term closure, he has now opened himself up for all kinds of legal liability, lawsuits and persecution in the courts.

Hypothesis: If he continues to operate in the future his situation will change.

We don't know if his situation will change in the future. Only that there is a risk that it could change.

Jika dia mengambil kedudukan itu, dia juga menghadapi risiko yang pada masa akan datang keadaannya berubah sehingga dia tidak boleh terus beroperasi tanpa penutupan sementara atau penutupan jangka panjang, dia kini telah membuka diri untuk semua jenis liabiliti undang-undang, tindakan undang-undang dan penganiayaan di mahkamah.

Jika dia terus beroperasi pada masa hadapan keadaannya akan berubah.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, after rising in the House on March 16 to ask the government about the future plans for Devco I was attacked by the Minister of Natural Resources who, when asked by a fellow government member about the Liberal position on Devco, the Donkin mine and other issues of grave concern to the people of Cape Breton Island, resorted to the worst form of heckling and insult.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker has a house.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, selepas bangkit di Dewan pada 16 Mac untuk bertanya kepada kerajaan tentang rancangan masa depan untuk Devco I telah diserang oleh Menteri Sumber Asli yang apabila ditanya oleh rakan-rakan kerajaan mengenai kedudukan Liberal di Devco, lombong Donkin. dan isu-isu lain yang membimbangkan penduduk Pulau Cape Breton, menggunakan bentuk makian dan penghinaan yang paling teruk.


Premise: Now, what happens is when you begin to get people covered like that -- for instance in diabetes, if you diagnose diabetes early, you could save $50 billion in the health care system of America by avoiding surgery and dialysis. It works. And I'm going to offer it to America.

Hypothesis: If you diagnose diabetes early no one will need surgery or dialysis.

The context says diagnosing early could save money on surgery or dialysis. The implication is that there would be less need for surgery or dialysis, but the context isn't enough to know there will be no need for those things.

Sekarang, apa yang berlaku ialah apabila anda mula mendapatkan orang yang dilindungi seperti itu -- contohnya dalam diabetes, jika anda mendiagnosis diabetes lebih awal, anda boleh menjimatkan $50 bilion dalam sistem penjagaan kesihatan Amerika dengan mengelakkan pembedahan dan dialisis. Ianya berfungsi. Dan saya akan menawarkannya kepada Amerika.

Jika anda mendiagnosis diabetes lebih awal, tiada siapa yang memerlukan pembedahan atau dialisis.


Premise: But I pledge this to you, America: I will do it in the way that Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan and John Kennedy and others did, where we build the strongest alliances, where the world joins together, where we have the best intelligence and where we are able, ultimately, to be more safe and secure.

Hypothesis: The speaker is slightly familiar with american history

It cannot be derived from the limited information just how knowledgeable this speaker is of american history

Tetapi saya berikrar ini kepada anda, Amerika: Saya akan melakukannya dengan cara yang Franklin Roosevelt dan Ronald Reagan dan John Kennedy dan yang lain lakukan, di mana kita membina pakatan terkuat, di mana dunia bergabung bersama, di mana kita mempunyai kecerdasan terbaik dan di mana kita mampu, akhirnya, menjadi lebih selamat dan terjamin.

Penceramah agak biasa dengan sejarah Amerika


Premise: Could the government explain what ongoing action it is taking, what progress has been made to date and when a final resolution is expected, with respect to the present situation whereby American shipbuilders have open access to the Canadian market, yet Canadian commercial vessels are prohibited for sale in the USA?

Hypothesis: Government can explain what ongoing action it is taking

The text is a question if they can explain, we do not know if they can or not

Bolehkah kerajaan menjelaskan tindakan berterusan yang sedang diambil, kemajuan yang telah dibuat setakat ini dan bila resolusi muktamad dijangka, berkenaan dengan situasi sekarang di mana pembuat kapal Amerika mempunyai akses terbuka ke pasaran Kanada, namun kapal komersial Kanada dilarang untuk jualan di Amerika Syarikat?

Kerajaan boleh menjelaskan tindakan berterusan yang sedang diambil


Premise: As a final comment, I would also like to know how all of these changes that put greater emphasis on rehabilitation and community reformation, greater emphasis on alternative measures and putting the emphasis on the community services element now to help in the reformation of these young people, will be paid for.

Hypothesis: the changes made rehab reform communities.

the changes put greater emphasis on these two, it doesn't say that the changes made one influence the other. I think the system mixed this up.

Sebagai ulasan terakhir, saya juga ingin tahu bagaimana semua perubahan ini yang memberi penekanan yang lebih besar kepada pemulihan dan reformasi komuniti, penekanan yang lebih kepada langkah-langkah alternatif dan memberi penekanan kepada elemen perkhidmatan masyarakat sekarang untuk membantu dalam reformasi golongan muda ini. , akan dibayar.

perubahan yang dilakukan oleh komuniti reformasi pemulihan.


Premise: But you can't say when you walk into a classroom, you're not teaching. And if that's what's happening in the Dover school system and my children are in that school system, that they're routinely establishing practices that is not teaching in the classroom, then that's shameful.

Hypothesis: Establishing practices that are not teaching in the classroom is what's happening in the Dover school system.

The writer argues 'IF that's what's happening in the Dover school system"- so we can't be certain anything of the sort is actually happening. The model ignored the word IF.

Tetapi anda tidak boleh mengatakan apabila anda masuk ke dalam bilik darjah, anda tidak mengajar. Dan jika itu yang berlaku dalam sistem sekolah Dover dan anak-anak saya berada dalam sistem sekolah itu, bahawa mereka secara rutin mewujudkan amalan yang tidak mengajar di dalam bilik darjah, maka itu memalukan.

Mewujudkan amalan yang tidak mengajar di dalam bilik darjah adalah perkara yang berlaku dalam sistem sekolah Dover.


Premise: It says, Wherein an affidavit is provided in lieu of testimony to support a newspaper article or newspaper articles, the reporter shall be obligated to testify as to the facts set forth in the articles, i.e., what was seen and heard as related in the newspaper articles.

Hypothesis: Testimonies can always be from an affidavit.

Ia berkata, Di mana afidavit disediakan sebagai ganti kesaksian untuk menyokong artikel akhbar atau artikel akhbar, wartawan hendaklah bertanggungjawab untuk memberi keterangan tentang fakta yang dinyatakan dalam artikel itu, iaitu, apa yang dilihat dan didengar seperti yang berkaitan dalam akhbar itu. artikel.

Testimoni sentiasa boleh daripada afidavit.


Premise: I want to get a sense for what your understanding is of what is going on in the ninth-grade biology class that your daughter will be attending several years from now. Is it your understanding that Darwin's theory of evolution is going to be taught pursuant to the state academic standards?

Hypothesis: Darwin's Theory of Evolution will be taught in the public schools

It is not stated whether or not they are discussing public schools

Saya ingin memahami pemahaman anda tentang perkara yang berlaku dalam kelas biologi gred sembilan yang akan dihadiri oleh anak perempuan anda beberapa tahun dari sekarang. Adakah pemahaman anda bahawa teori evolusi Darwin akan diajar mengikut piawaian akademik negeri?

Teori Evolusi Darwin akan diajar di sekolah awam


Premise: Justice Ginsburg, we have no quarrel with the objective of harmonization fitting within the "promote the progress of science" understanding subject to constitutional limitations. If France adopted a rule that said you couldn't grant copyrights to hate speech, we could not harmonize with that rule consistent with our First Amendment and similarly, as Mary Beth Peters testified before Congress, ours is the only Constitution that has an express limitation on terms.

Hypothesis: France does not have a constitution

The context talks about the US constitution, and does not say or imply whether or not France has one

Hakim Ginsburg, kami tidak mempunyai pertengkaran dengan objektif penyelarasan yang sesuai dalam pemahaman "menggalakkan kemajuan sains" tertakluk kepada batasan perlembagaan. Jika Perancis menerima pakai peraturan yang mengatakan anda tidak boleh memberikan hak cipta kepada ucapan benci, kami tidak boleh menyelaraskan dengan peraturan itu selaras dengan Pindaan Pertama kami dan begitu juga, seperti yang dinyatakan oleh Mary Beth Peters di hadapan Kongres, Perlembagaan kami adalah satu-satunya Perlembagaan yang mempunyai had nyata dengan syarat.


Premise: Yes, it does. Take, for example, Third World debt. I think we ought to be forgiving Third World debt under certain conditions. I think, for example, if we're convinced that a Third World country that's got a lot of debt would reform itself, that the money wouldn't go into the hands of a few but would go to help people, I think it makes sense for us to use our wealth in that way, or to trade debt for valuable rain forest lands, makes that much sense, yes.

Hypothesis: The third world country would be indebted to us forever if they can't pay it back.

There is no telling if the third world country would be indebted to us forever if they could not repay back the money. I'm not sure how our leaders deal with things like that.

Ya, memang begitu. Ambil, sebagai contoh, hutang Dunia Ketiga. Saya fikir kita sepatutnya memaafkan hutang Dunia Ketiga dalam keadaan tertentu. Saya fikir, sebagai contoh, jika kita yakin bahawa negara Dunia Ketiga yang mempunyai banyak hutang akan melakukan pembaharuan sendiri, bahawa wang itu tidak akan jatuh ke tangan segelintir orang tetapi akan pergi untuk membantu orang ramai, saya fikir ia menghasilkan wajar untuk kita menggunakan kekayaan kita dengan cara itu, atau untuk menukar hutang untuk tanah hutan hujan yang berharga, sangat masuk akal, ya.

Negara dunia ketiga akan berhutang dengan kita selama-lamanya jika mereka tidak dapat membayarnya.


Premise: I haven't started naming names except for one person, and that's Mr. Richard Cheney who I thought did a great job the other night. He's a vice presidential nominee who represents -- I think people got to see why I picked him. He's man of solid judgment and he's going to be a person to stand by my side.

Hypothesis: Mr. Richard Cheney did a great job speaking the other night.

The text only says he thought Mr. Richard Cheney did a great job the other night - it doesn't say what kind of job or whether it involved a speech. The model ignored the word 'speaking' I think.

Saya belum mula menamakan nama kecuali satu orang, dan itulah Encik Richard Cheney yang saya fikir melakukan kerja yang hebat pada malam yang lain. Dia seorang calon naib presiden yang mewakili -- saya rasa orang ramai perlu melihat sebab saya memilihnya. Dia seorang yang mempunyai pertimbangan yang kukuh dan dia akan menjadi orang yang berdiri di sisi saya.

Encik Richard Cheney melakukan kerja yang hebat semasa bercakap pada malam yang lain.


Premise: Mr. Putin is going to have to make the decision as to whether or not he wants to adhere to rule of law and normal accounting practices so that if countries and/or entities invest capital, there's a reasonable rate of return, a way to get the money out of the economy.

Hypothesis: Mr. Putin is the president.

It is unclear if Mr. Putin is the president based on this context. The system was confused by the context.

Encik Putin perlu membuat keputusan sama ada dia mahu mematuhi peraturan undang-undang dan amalan perakaunan biasa supaya jika negara dan/atau entiti melabur modal, terdapat kadar pulangan yang munasabah, satu cara untuk mendapatkan wang keluar dari ekonomi.


Premise: Let us reform the budget so that some day the working poor will pay no income tax, so that some day seniors on fixed incomes will no longer fear the taxman coming, so that some day all taxpayers will pay the same percentage rate of taxation, so that some day the federal government will live within modest means and help rather than hurt, and so that some day we will have viable universal medicare for everyone.

Hypothesis: There will be no tax fear in the years ahead

You do not know years in advance if something will bring fear or not

Marilah kita memperbaharui bajet supaya suatu hari nanti golongan miskin yang bekerja tidak akan membayar cukai pendapatan, supaya suatu hari nanti warga emas berpendapatan tetap tidak lagi takut kepada pencukai yang datang, supaya suatu hari nanti semua pembayar cukai akan membayar kadar peratusan cukai yang sama, jadi bahawa suatu hari nanti kerajaan persekutuan akan hidup dalam keadaan sederhana dan membantu daripada menyakiti, dan supaya suatu hari nanti kita akan mempunyai penjagaan perubatan sejagat yang berdaya maju untuk semua orang.

Tidak akan ada ketakutan cukai pada tahun-tahun akan datang


Premise: The Prime Minister is dragging this issue out so he can avoid the whole debate about tax relief, simply because he would much rather spend that money and have his bureaucrats and people in government spend that money as opposed to leaving it in the pockets of individual Canadians who desperately need it.

Hypothesis: Candian tax rates are okay.

It doesn't talk about them being anytthing really. Only being avoided by the PM.

Perdana Menteri sedang mengheret isu ini supaya beliau dapat mengelak keseluruhan perdebatan mengenai pelepasan cukai, semata-mata kerana beliau lebih suka membelanjakan wang itu dan meminta birokrat dan orang dalam kerajaan membelanjakan wang itu berbanding meninggalkannya di dalam poket individu Kanada. yang amat memerlukannya.


Premise: Moreover, Canada encourages an expansion of religious freedom in China, including Tibet, and I do not doubt that Canada would welcome a dialogue between Chinese authorities and the Dalai Lama, a world spiritual leader who earned the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 for his dedication to peace and human rights.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Canada encourages the expansion of Tim Hortons franchises in Canada.  Therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Selain itu, Kanada menggalakkan perluasan kebebasan beragama di China, termasuk Tibet, dan saya tidak ragu bahawa Kanada akan mengalu-alukan dialog antara pihak berkuasa China dan Dalai Lama, seorang pemimpin rohani dunia yang memperoleh Hadiah Keamanan Nobel pada tahun 1989 atas dedikasinya kepada keamanan dan hak asasi manusia.

Kanada menggalakkan pengembangan francais Tim Hortons di Kanada.


Premise: Your Honor, one thing I might ask, since it is perhaps likely that issues are going to arise during the deposition, I'm wondering if we could now attempt to schedule the deposition at a time when everybody, including Your Honor, might be available to intercede.

Hypothesis: A judge can hold office for life.

Yang Berhormat, satu perkara yang saya boleh tanya, memandangkan kemungkinan besar isu akan timbul semasa pemendapan, saya tertanya-tanya sama ada kita kini boleh cuba menjadualkan pemendapan pada masa semua orang, termasuk Yang Berhormat, mungkin tersedia. untuk memberi syafaat.

Hakim boleh memegang jawatan seumur hidup.


Premise: I agree with that. I agree with that. I think that one of the problems that we have faced in the world is that we are so much more powerful than any single nation has been in relationship to the rest of the world than at any time in history, that I know about, anyway.

Hypothesis: We have faced more problems than any other nation.

It is possible that more problems have been faced than any other nation. And it is possible that that is not the case. Either case is a possibility, so neither definitely correct or incorrect.

Saya bersetuju dengan itu. Saya bersetuju dengan itu. Saya berpendapat bahawa salah satu masalah yang kita hadapi di dunia ialah kita jauh lebih berkuasa daripada mana-mana negara yang mempunyai hubungan dengan seluruh dunia berbanding pada bila-bila masa dalam sejarah, yang saya tahu, bagaimanapun.

Kita telah menghadapi lebih banyak masalah daripada negara lain.


Premise: But does he know that, for example, Quebec's Unibroue, the micro-brewery Quebeckers are so proud of because it produces a quality beer that is sold all over the world, is unable to sell a single bottle of beer in Ontario because of the tariffs and structures the Ontario government has put in place to keep out producers from Quebec and, I suppose, from other provinces also?

Hypothesis: Quebec's Unibroue sells the largest volume of beer in Canada.

Quebec's Unibroue is unable to sell a single bottle of beer in Ontario but the author does not state for sure whether it is sold in other provinces or not. Thus, it could be the largest volume in all of Canada.

Tetapi adakah dia tahu bahawa, sebagai contoh, unibroue Quebec, Quebeckers mikro-brewery sangat bangga kerana ia menghasilkan bir berkualiti yang dijual di seluruh dunia, tidak dapat menjual sebotol bir di Ontario kerana tarif Dan struktur kerajaan Ontario telah meletakkan tempat untuk menghalang pengeluar dari Quebec dan, saya rasa, dari wilayah lain juga?

Unibroue Quebec menjual jumlah bir terbesar di Kanada.


Premise: Honourable senators, as I stand here today, it is particularly painful to know that in spite of the shock, the revulsion, the widespread publicity and awareness that has flowed from this dreadful event, violence against women and children continues to grow in our country and around the world.

Hypothesis: the senators are standing

We dont know what the senators are doing - they could be standing or sitting ....

Yang dihormati Senator, semasa saya berdiri di sini hari ini, adalah amat menyakitkan untuk mengetahui bahawa di sebalik kejutan, kebencian, publisiti dan kesedaran yang meluas yang telah mengalir daripada peristiwa yang mengerikan ini, keganasan terhadap wanita dan kanak-kanak terus berkembang di negara kita dan seluruh dunia.


Premise: In the meantime, this does not prevent the political arms, ours in the Senate, and the House of Commons, from taking their full responsibility and giving their opinions in their respective spheres of influence, by virtue of the principle of the separation of the three powers, which is also at the heart of our constitutional system.

Hypothesis: The political arms in the Senate and the House of Commons have different opinions and spheres of influence.

This one's hard to even make a sentence out of. Anyway, the Senate and the House of Commons probably have the same sphere of influence, but who knows what their opinions are. The system probably struggled with this one for the same reason a human would, it's just difficult to understand without a lot more context.

Dalam pada itu, ini tidak menghalang senjata politik, kami di Dewan Negara, dan Dewan Rakyat, daripada mengambil tanggungjawab sepenuhnya dan memberikan pendapat mereka dalam bidang pengaruh masing-masing, berdasarkan prinsip pemisahan ketiga-tiga kuasa, yang juga merupakan nadi sistem perlembagaan kita.

Senjata politik di Dewan Negara dan Dewan Rakyat mempunyai pendapat dan bidang pengaruh yang berbeza.


Premise: You will recall, Mr. Speaker, and I will repeat it because you were perhaps not in the Chair at the time, but during a speech at second reading I mentioned that the word Ports Canada should be spelled P-o-r-k-s Canada, because it was an institution that needed-and since we are into the bacon here-to be trimmed of some of its fat.

Hypothesis: The speaker was absent from the speech

we do not know if he was absent, only that he may not have been in his chair.

Anda akan ingat, Tuan Yang di-Pertua, dan saya akan mengulanginya kerana anda mungkin tidak berada di kerusi pada masa itu, tetapi semasa ucapan pada bacaan kedua saya menyebut bahawa perkataan Ports Canada harus dieja P-o-r-k-s Canada, kerana ia adalah sebuah institusi. itu diperlukan-dan kerana kita berada di sini bacon-untuk dipangkas daripada beberapa lemaknya.


Premise: Well, it may provide additional incentives for the patentee to exploit and promote and disseminate that particular work. With respect to creative works like works of art, books and that sort of thing, it 20 patentee, that there was a bargain in effect between the inventor and the Government that at a certain period of time it would become part of the public domain. It seems to me it's inconsistent with that.

Hypothesis: A patent is free to get.

Ia mungkin memberikan insentif tambahan kepada pemegang paten untuk mengeksploitasi dan mempromosi serta menyebarkan karya tertentu itu. Berkenaan dengan karya kreatif seperti karya seni, buku dan sebagainya, ia 20 pemegang paten, bahawa terdapat perjanjian yang berkuat kuasa antara pencipta dan Kerajaan bahawa pada satu tempoh masa tertentu ia akan menjadi sebahagian daripada domain awam. Nampaknya pada saya ia tidak konsisten dengan itu.


Premise: On August 19, 1999, I received a letter from Dr. Chopra in which he states that, "I mentioned that all these actions were the direct consequence of my testimony, which I was requested (required) to give before the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry for its bovine growth hormone rBST investigations."

Hypothesis: Dr. Chopra had no eyebrows.

It is not mentioned whether Dr. Chopra has eyebrows but the system assumes this because most people do.

Pada 19 Ogos 1999, saya menerima surat daripada Dr Chopra di mana beliau menyatakan bahawa, "Saya menyebut bahawa semua tindakan ini adalah akibat langsung daripada keterangan saya, yang saya diminta (diperlukan) untuk memberikan di hadapan Jawatankuasa Tetap Senat mengenai Pertanian dan Perhutanan untuk penyiasatan rBST hormon pertumbuhan lembu."


Premise: Honourable senators, I see today in this chamber former premiers, former ministers of the Crown, party leaders, members of the federal and provincial legislatures; business leaders, bankers, financiers, administrators, bureaucrats; professionals in the fields of health, education, law, communications, tourism, agriculture and natural resources, with the very recent addition of a nun.

Hypothesis: The senator is a former minister of the Crown.

We are not sure who is speaking and if they are a former minister of the crown.

Yang dihormati senator, saya lihat hari ini dalam dewan ini bekas perdana menteri, bekas menteri Mahkota, pemimpin parti, ahli perundangan persekutuan dan wilayah; pemimpin perniagaan, jurubank, pembiaya, pentadbir, birokrat; profesional dalam bidang kesihatan, pendidikan, undang-undang, komunikasi, pelancongan, pertanian dan sumber semula jadi, dengan penambahan seorang biarawati.


Premise: There is no question that John Stewart has brought a powerful personal commitment to defining a realistic approach to our unending preoccupation with war and peace in the modern context, which, as he said in one of his early speeches in this house, sometimes tends to tire us out and foster a lack of will to persist in advancing that cause.

Hypothesis: The narrator is a man

It does not state whether or not the narrator is a man or a woman.

Tidak ada persoalan bahawa John Stewart telah membawa komitmen peribadi yang kuat untuk menentukan pendekatan yang realistik terhadap keasyikan kita yang tidak berkesudahan dengan peperangan dan keamanan dalam konteks moden, yang, seperti yang dia katakan dalam salah satu ucapan awalnya di rumah ini, kadang-kadang cenderung meletihkan. kita keluar dan memupuk kekurangan kemahuan untuk berterusan dalam memajukan tujuan itu.


Premise: With reference to the honourable senator's remarks concerning the current non-determinative role of the Senate of Canada, has she in her reflections on this matter considered some of the ways in which the bill could be amended to very easily accommodate both the desire of the Prime Minister not to have this process held up in terms of time, and, second, to meet the very serious obligations before us in this house?

Hypothesis: The Senate of Canada will meet in the year 2248

If the government stays unchanged in 200+ years, which is possible, then it will probably meet. But Canada may or may not exist in the year 2248, or they may have a different form of government.

Merujuk kepada kenyataan Yang Berhormat senator mengenai peranan bukan penentu semasa Senat Kanada, adakah beliau dalam renungan mengenai perkara ini mempertimbangkan beberapa cara di mana rang undang-undang itu boleh dipinda untuk menampung kedua-dua hasrat Perdana Menteri dengan mudah? Menteri untuk tidak menahan proses ini dari segi masa, dan, kedua, untuk memenuhi kewajipan yang sangat serius di hadapan kita di dewan ini?

Senat Kanada akan bermesyuarat pada tahun 2248


Premise: Will the Leader of the Government in the Senate tell us if his government is seriously looking into this very desperate situation, and if they will consider undertaking a major study to determine what direction we as a country should take to alleviate this crisis situation which could explode across the country just as it did here this morning?

Hypothesis: The crisis will not not explode again in the afternoon just as it did in the morning

Double negatives completely fool the AI.

Adakah Pemimpin Kerajaan di Dewan Negara akan memberitahu kita jika kerajaannya serius melihat keadaan yang sangat terdesak ini, dan jika mereka akan mempertimbangkan untuk menjalankan kajian besar untuk menentukan hala tuju yang kita sebagai sebuah negara harus ambil untuk mengurangkan situasi krisis yang boleh meletup ini di seluruh negara sama seperti yang berlaku di sini pagi ini?

Krisis tidak akan meletup lagi pada sebelah petang seperti yang berlaku pada waktu pagi


Premise: But I think it's about his priorities. And let me tell you exactly why I think that the choice he made to give a tax cut for the oil companies and others before addressing this -- I mean, if you were the governor of a state that was dead last in health care for families, and all of a sudden you found yourself with the biggest surplus your state had ever had in its history, wouldn't you want to maybe use some of it to climb from 50th to, say, 45 or 40 or something or maybe better?

Hypothesis: health care was used by arnold

Tetapi saya fikir ia adalah mengenai keutamaannya. Dan izinkan saya memberitahu anda dengan tepat mengapa saya berpendapat bahawa pilihan yang dia buat untuk memberikan potongan cukai untuk syarikat minyak dan lain-lain sebelum menangani perkara ini -- maksud saya, jika anda adalah gabenor negeri yang terakhir mati dalam penjagaan kesihatan untuk keluarga , dan tiba-tiba anda mendapati diri anda mempunyai lebihan terbesar yang pernah dialami oleh negeri anda dalam sejarahnya, tidakkah anda mahu menggunakan sebahagian daripadanya untuk mendaki dari tangga ke-50 kepada, katakan, 45 atau 40 atau sesuatu atau mungkin lebih baik?

penjagaan kesihatan digunakan oleh arnold


Premise: And recognizing that, I called together a group of our fellow citizens to study the issue. It was a committee chaired by the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, a Democrat. And they came up with a variety of ideas for people to look at.

Hypothesis: Senator Moynihan was committee chair at the time of his death

It is not stated when he died. I think the system got it wrong because it attempted to make an unfounded inference

Dan menyedari perkara itu, saya memanggil sekumpulan warganegara kita untuk mengkaji isu tersebut. Ia adalah jawatankuasa yang dipengerusikan oleh mendiang Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan dari New York, seorang Demokrat. Dan mereka datang dengan pelbagai idea untuk tatapan orang ramai.

Senator Moynihan adalah pengerusi jawatankuasa semasa kematiannya


Premise: The federal act, when it applies to Quebec and the other provinces, will affect federally regulated businesses-notably telephone companies, banks, airlines and interprovincial carriers-as well as all interprovincial and international personal data exchanges for business purposes.

Hypothesis: the federal act applies to not only quebec but all of the states this side of the prime meridian.

It says nothing else about all of the states on the side of the prime meridian. I think the system got confused when i said "not only"

Akta persekutuan, apabila ia terpakai untuk Quebec dan wilayah lain, akan menjejaskan perniagaan yang dikawal selia oleh persekutuan-terutamanya syarikat telefon, bank, syarikat penerbangan dan pembawa antara wilayah-serta semua pertukaran data peribadi antara wilayah dan antarabangsa untuk tujuan perniagaan.

akta persekutuan terpakai bukan sahaja untuk quebec tetapi semua negeri di sebelah meridian utama ini.


Premise: The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Treasury Board, and taking into account collective agreements entered into by the employer in respect of bargaining units in the Public Service since the Public Sector Compensation Act ceased to apply to compensation plans applicable to them-

Hypothesis: The union elects the Governor in Council.

We are not given any information on how the Governor in Council is elected.

Gabenor dalam Majlis boleh, atas syor Lembaga Perbendaharaan, dan mengambil kira perjanjian kolektif yang dibuat oleh majikan berkenaan dengan unit tawar-menawar dalam Perkhidmatan Awam sejak Akta Pampasan Sektor Awam tidak lagi terpakai kepada pelan pampasan yang terpakai kepada mereka-


Premise: I suppose we might as well blow another $49,249 on a cross cultural study of semiotic management and transformation of facial features in the makeup and masks of performers or $20,000 to examine the ecclesiastical courts of 19th century England or $35,000 for a study on craft industries in post-medieval Iran.

Hypothesis: We blew another $49,249 on a cross cultural study.

They "might as well blow another" we don't know if they did.

Saya rasa kita mungkin juga meniup $49,249 lagi untuk kajian silang budaya pengurusan semiotik dan transformasi ciri-ciri wajah dalam solek dan topeng penghibur atau $20,000 untuk memeriksa mahkamah gerejawi England abad ke-19 atau $35,000 untuk kajian tentang industri kraf dalam jawatan. -Iran zaman pertengahan.

Kami mengeluarkan $49,249 lagi untuk kajian silang budaya.


Premise: Justice, that's right. If only we had the Framers' copyright before us, because of course, again remember,the exclusive right the Framers spoke of was the right to print and publish. It didn't include the derivative rights, it didn't include the display rights, and it certainly --

Hypothesis: The Framers are dead.

The statement refers to the Framers' intention with respect to the copyright. We have no idea whether or not they are still alive. They may be or they may not be.

Keadilan, betul. Kalaulah kami mempunyai hak cipta Framers sebelum kami, kerana sudah tentu, sekali lagi ingat, hak eksklusif Framers bercakap tentang hak untuk mencetak dan menerbitkan. Ia tidak termasuk hak terbitan, ia tidak termasuk hak paparan, dan ia pastinya --


Premise: Actually, I am, because I recall them -- an organization actually sending the library those books, because there was controversy in those books being put in there, too. And there were many members of the community who had called to see whether those books had actually gotten there or not, into the library, because we weren't certain that those books were going to be allowed in the library, permitted in the library.

Hypothesis: this person is very uninformed on this issue

they are unwilling to take a stand, speak in generalities, and use soft and uninterested language to describe their thoughts

Sebenarnya, saya, kerana saya mengingati mereka -- sebuah organisasi yang sebenarnya menghantar buku-buku itu ke perpustakaan, kerana terdapat kontroversi dalam buku-buku itu yang diletakkan di sana juga. Dan terdapat ramai ahli masyarakat yang telah menelefon untuk melihat sama ada buku-buku itu benar-benar sampai ke sana atau tidak, ke dalam perpustakaan, kerana kami tidak pasti bahawa buku-buku itu akan dibenarkan di perpustakaan, dibenarkan di perpustakaan.

orang ini sangat tidak tahu tentang isu ini


Premise: In an instance like this one where there is even a political staffer being quoted in the newspaper as saying the process for doling out cash in Shawinigan was outside the standard practices of the Department of Human Resources Development, one has to wonder if an appropriate watchdog body's time is not due.

Hypothesis: Cities dole out cash all the time

It could go either way, this is just one city

Dalam keadaan seperti ini di mana terdapat seorang kakitangan politik yang dipetik dalam akhbar sebagai berkata proses untuk mengagihkan wang tunai di Shawinigan adalah di luar amalan standard Jabatan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia, seseorang perlu tertanya-tanya sama ada badan pemerhati yang sesuai masa belum tiba.

Bandar-bandar memberikan wang tunai sepanjang masa


Premise: I would like to ask my hon. colleague if he sees any relationship between the justices, their influence by the law schools, by the lawyers of the community of which they are a part and if this is part of the reason that these justices are being given these pay raises that perhaps other frontline bureaucrats and government workers are not entitled to.

Hypothesis: Justices got large pay raises.

The text does not state the size of the pay raises, so the model just assumed.

Saya ingin bertanya kepada tuan saya. rakan sekerjanya jika dia melihat apa-apa hubungan antara hakim, pengaruh mereka oleh sekolah undang-undang, oleh peguam masyarakat di mana mereka adalah sebahagian daripadanya dan jika ini adalah sebahagian daripada sebab hakim ini diberi kenaikan gaji ini yang mungkin barisan hadapan lain birokrat dan pekerja kerajaan tidak berhak.

Hakim mendapat kenaikan gaji yang besar.


Premise: As a matter of fact, such partnership should eventually apply to every NAFTA country in order to have uniform environmental standards so that all industries and businesses are equally respectful of the environment, and provide for environmental impacts in their production costs, thus enabling them to sell their products at competitive prices while respecting the environment.

Hypothesis: This was written in 1835+2

It does not say what year it was written, so it is neither correct nor incorrect.

Pada hakikatnya, perkongsian sedemikian akhirnya harus terpakai kepada setiap negara NAFTA untuk mempunyai piawaian alam sekitar yang seragam supaya semua industri dan perniagaan sama-sama menghormati alam sekitar, dan menyediakan kesan alam sekitar dalam kos pengeluaran mereka, sekali gus membolehkan mereka menjual produk mereka pada harga yang kompetitif sambil menghormati alam sekitar.


Premise: The coalition against Saddam has fallen apart or it's unraveling, let's put it that way. The sanctions are being violated. We don't know whether he's developing weapons of mass destruction. He better not be or there's going to be a consequence should I be the president.

Hypothesis: Saddam is the bomb

Gabungan menentang Saddam telah berantakan atau sudah terungkai, biarlah begitu. Sekatan dilanggar. Kami tidak tahu sama ada dia sedang membangunkan senjata pemusnah besar-besaran. Dia lebih baik tidak menjadi atau akan ada akibat sekiranya saya menjadi presiden.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, we are not carrying out a nuclear program with India and Pakistan, but with respect to nuclear reactors that were supplied before the program ended in 1976, we are in the light of the views of the International Atomic Energy Association helping provide information to make sure that these reactors are maintained safely in the interests of civilian populations.

Hypothesis: There is no nuclear program with India and Pakistan due to views of the International Atomic Energy Association's concerns to maintain the safety of civilian populations

It's neither definitely correct nor incorrect because the original statement does not give the reason for why there is no nuclear program with India and Pakistan

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, kami tidak menjalankan program nuklear dengan India dan Pakistan, tetapi berkenaan dengan reaktor nuklear yang dibekalkan sebelum program itu berakhir pada tahun 1976, kami berdasarkan pandangan Persatuan Tenaga Atom Antarabangsa yang membantu memberikan maklumat. untuk memastikan bahawa reaktor ini diselenggara dengan selamat demi kepentingan penduduk awam.

Tiada program nuklear dengan India dan Pakistan kerana pandangan mengenai kebimbangan Persatuan Tenaga Atom Antarabangsa untuk mengekalkan keselamatan penduduk awam


Premise: A brown field is an abandoned industrial site that just sits idle in some of our urban centers. And people are willing to invest capital in the brown fields don't want to do so for fear of lawsuit. I think we ought to have federal liability protection, depending upon whether or not standards have been met.

Hypothesis: Brown fields are not actually brown

Padang coklat ialah tapak perindustrian terbiar yang hanya terbiar di beberapa pusat bandar kami. Dan orang ramai sanggup melabur modal dalam bidang coklat tidak mahu berbuat demikian kerana takut tuntutan mahkamah. Saya fikir kita sepatutnya mempunyai perlindungan liabiliti persekutuan, bergantung kepada sama ada piawaian telah dipenuhi atau tidak.


Premise: It was sometime in 2004. It was prior to the June meetings because my husband was a teacher at the school, so I often heard things that he would come home and tell me. So I knew that there was some discussion over the biology book, so sometime before that. I can't tell you exactly when.

Hypothesis: In 2003, the biology book was published.

We do not know when the biology book was published so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.

Ia adalah pada tahun 2004. Ia sebelum mesyuarat Jun kerana suami saya seorang guru di sekolah, jadi saya sering mendengar perkara yang dia akan pulang dan memberitahu saya. Jadi saya tahu bahawa terdapat beberapa perbincangan mengenai buku biologi, jadi kadang-kadang sebelum itu. Saya tidak boleh memberitahu anda dengan tepat bila.

Pada tahun 2003, buku biologi diterbitkan.


Premise: If the federal government in its infinite wisdom-since it always knows more than anyone else about all issues relating to the environment-were to decide that we need to make an additional 5%, 6% or 7% reduction to industrial emissions, to toxic emissions in the atmosphere, under the agreements negotiated at Kyoto, on a uniform basis across Canada, this would be easily complied with by Alberta, where the emissions have increased in recent years.

Hypothesis: Federal government in its infinite wisdom always knows more than anyone.

Jika kerajaan persekutuan dalam kebijaksanaannya yang tidak terhingga-kerana ia sentiasa mengetahui lebih daripada orang lain tentang semua isu yang berkaitan dengan alam sekitar-telah memutuskan bahawa kita perlu membuat pengurangan tambahan 5%, 6% atau 7% kepada pelepasan industri, kepada toksik pelepasan di atmosfera, di bawah perjanjian yang dirundingkan di Kyoto, secara seragam di seluruh Kanada, ini akan dipatuhi dengan mudah oleh Alberta, di mana pelepasan telah meningkat dalam beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini.

Kerajaan persekutuan dalam kebijaksanaannya yang tidak terhingga sentiasa mengetahui lebih daripada sesiapa pun.


Premise: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Hypothesis: Pepin-Robarts is a person.

I know from prior knowledge that Pepin-Robarts refers to a report written by two people (Pepin and Robarts).  The way the statement is phrased makes it seem like Pepin-Robarts is a person.  From just the context, there is no way to be sure.

Keseragaman bukanlah satu sine qua non, dan di sinilah Pepin-Robarts mengingatkan kita tentang kemudahan mengikut serta dan menarik diri serta meningkatkan pampasan dalam memilih keluar memberi peluang jika ada semangat muhibah dan kompromi pragmatik untuk bersenam. pengaturan untuk menampung pluralisme yang semakin meningkat dalam masyarakat persekutuan kita.


Premise: The AIDS epidemic has taught us a great deal about what it means for an individual to have been abandoned by his family, then become a prominent artist, then be nursed to his death by his partner, or as the language has changed, his significant other, his long time companion, his partner, his spouse.

Hypothesis: The AIDS epidemic has taught us a great deal about artists.

The AIDS epidemic has taught us a great deal about people... not just artists.

Wabak AIDS telah banyak mengajar kita tentang ertinya seseorang individu telah ditinggalkan oleh keluarganya, kemudian menjadi artis terkemuka, kemudian diasuh hingga mati oleh pasangannya, atau apabila bahasa telah berubah, orang pentingnya. , teman lamanya, pasangannya, pasangannya.

Wabak AIDS telah banyak mengajar kita tentang artis.


Premise: Well, I have no idea. I mean, he can throw out all kinds -- I don't know the particulars of this law. I will tell you I'm the kind of person, I don't hire or fire somebody based upon their sexual orientation. As a matter of fact, I would like to take the issue a little further. I don't really think it's any of my -- you know, any of my concerns what -- how you conduct your sex life. And I think that's a private matter. And I think that's the way it ought to be. But I'm going to be respectful for people, I'll tolerate people, and I support equal rights but not special rights for people.

The person in the context has opinions on the relevance of sexual orientation, and mentioned they don't care how someone conducts their sex life. I wrote that "This person knows how to conduct their sex life" which is an unknown so it should be either definitely correct nor definitely incorrect

Nah, saya tidak tahu. Maksud saya, dia boleh membuang semua jenis -- saya tidak tahu butiran undang-undang ini. Saya akan memberitahu anda saya jenis orang, saya tidak mengupah atau memecat seseorang berdasarkan orientasi seksual mereka. Sebenarnya, saya ingin membawa isu ini lebih jauh. Saya tidak fikir ia adalah salah satu daripada saya -- anda tahu, apa-apa kebimbangan saya apa -- bagaimana anda menjalankan kehidupan seks anda. Dan saya fikir itu adalah perkara peribadi. Dan saya rasa itulah cara yang sepatutnya. Tetapi saya akan menghormati orang, saya akan bertolak ansur dengan orang, dan saya menyokong hak sama rata tetapi bukan hak istimewa untuk orang.

Orang ini tahu cara menjalankan kehidupan seks mereka


Premise: Mr. Speaker, since the problems of InterCanadian are directly related to his mishandling of the Onex bid to acquire Air Canada and Canadian Airlines, does the Minister of Transport not have a responsibility to step in now in order to save the 900 jobs his incompetence has jeopardized?

Hypothesis: Mr Speaker has only one foot.

It does not mention Mr speaker number of feet but the system assumes he does not have one.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, oleh kerana masalah InterCanadian berkait secara langsung dengan salah mengendalikan bidaan Onex untuk memperoleh Air Canada dan Canadian Airlines, adakah Menteri Pengangkutan tidak bertanggungjawab untuk mengambil bahagian sekarang demi menyelamatkan 900 pekerjaan yang tidak cekap beliau miliki. terancam?

Tuan Yang di-Pertua hanya mempunyai satu kaki.


Premise: In speaking for myself, it would be my humble opinion that if these parties were called to the stand to testify and refuse to testify, as I just indicated to you, Your Honor, that I think the focus of this trial all of the sudden isn't addressed as to intelligent design, but rather the media is going to be very much concerned in terms as to these stringers, not full-time employees, not employees at all, standing up for what they think is right.

Hypothesis: The speaker believes in intelligent design.

The statement is about the speaker's belief in intelligent design, and the context doesn't in any way indicate whether he believes in it.

Dalam bercakap untuk diri saya sendiri, adalah rendah hati saya bahawa jika pihak-pihak ini dipanggil untuk memberi keterangan dan enggan memberi keterangan, seperti yang saya nyatakan kepada Tuan Yang di-Pertua, bahawa saya fikir tumpuan perbicaraan ini secara tiba-tiba adalah tidak ditujukan kepada reka bentuk pintar, sebaliknya media akan sangat prihatin dari segi pemerhati ini, bukan pekerja sepenuh masa, bukan pekerja sama sekali, mempertahankan apa yang mereka fikirkan betul.

Pembesar suara percaya pada reka bentuk pintar.


Premise: That's certainly true, and we also believe that, for the reasons averted to by amicus AOL in this case and the reasons you've just suggested, the disruption in that context under the retrospectivity cases Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company would be sufficient to fit it within the, quote, "severe disruption exception" to the retrospectivity.

Hypothesis: the truth can't be certain

Itu sememangnya benar, dan kami juga percaya bahawa, atas sebab yang dielakkan oleh amicus AOL dalam kes ini dan sebab yang anda baru cadangkan, gangguan dalam konteks tersebut di bawah kes retrospektiviti Ryder dan Reynoldsville Casket Company akan mencukupi untuk menyesuaikannya dalam, petikan, "pengecualian gangguan teruk" kepada retrospektiviti.


Premise: I have no problem with the people on welfare having an opportunity for a job, but I do not agree with the fact that the government, because of problems due to its changes to employment insurance, takes people and, to get them off welfare because changes to employment insurance have resulted in an increase in the number of people on welfare, and sends them working in order to get them on employment insurance and off the provincial rolls.

Hypothesis: Employment of people on welfare always includes employment insurance.

The regulations and laws of this country cannot be known from the offered statement.

Saya tidak mempunyai masalah dengan orang yang berkebajikan mempunyai peluang untuk bekerja, tetapi saya tidak bersetuju dengan fakta bahawa kerajaan, kerana masalah disebabkan oleh perubahan kepada insurans pekerjaan, mengambil orang dan, untuk mendapatkan mereka daripada kebajikan kerana perubahan. kepada insurans pekerjaan telah mengakibatkan peningkatan dalam bilangan orang yang berkebajikan, dan menghantar mereka bekerja untuk mendapatkan mereka insurans pekerjaan dan keluar dari daftar wilayah.

Penggajian orang atas kebajikan sentiasa termasuk insurans pekerjaan.


Premise: I'm really strongly committed to clean water and clean air, and cleaning up the new kinds of challenges like global warming. He is right that I'm not in favor of energy taxes. I am in favor of tax cuts to encourage and give incentives for the quicker development of these new kinds of technologies.

Hypothesis: I've always believed in global warming

The statement doesn't say if I've always believed in global warming

Saya benar-benar komited untuk membersihkan air dan udara bersih, dan membersihkan jenis cabaran baharu seperti pemanasan global. Dia betul bahawa saya tidak memihak kepada cukai tenaga. Saya memihak kepada pemotongan cukai untuk menggalakkan dan memberi insentif untuk pembangunan lebih pantas bagi jenis teknologi baharu ini.

Saya sentiasa percaya pada pemanasan global


Premise: Our patriotism emanates from and has its source not only in ourselves and in our relationships with our fellow citizens, but also in the majesty of nature and the physical grandeur and beauty of our great dominion from the misty Grand Banks of Newfoundland to the Rocky Mountains, Vancouver and Queen Charlotte Islands''.

Hypothesis: The Grand Banks of Newfoundland were not founded until 1990

My statement is indeed neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect. The text states nothing about when the Grand Banks of Newfoundland were founded. For all the reader knows, they very well could have been founded in 1990 or they might not have. I think the system found this difficult because it picked up only on the existence of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland in the initial text, but didn't account for the unprecedented 1990.

Patriotisme kita berpunca daripada dan bersumberkan bukan sahaja dalam diri kita sendiri dan dalam hubungan kita dengan sesama warganegara kita, tetapi juga dalam keagungan alam semula jadi dan keagungan fizikal dan keindahan kuasa besar kita dari Grand Banks Newfoundland yang berkabus hingga ke Pergunungan Rocky, Vancouver dan Queen Charlotte Islands''.

Grand Banks of Newfoundland tidak diasaskan sehingga 1990


Premise: Without meaning to be critical of the Minister of Finance, I would point out that he has considerable authority, such as his authority with respect to the European Development Bank, the pan-American banks, the Asian Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Finance has considerable authority with all world banks

It lists some banks but that doesn't mean ALL banks in the world.

Tanpa bermaksud mengkritik Menteri Kewangan, saya akan menyatakan bahawa beliau mempunyai kuasa yang besar, seperti kuasanya berkenaan dengan Bank Pembangunan Eropah, bank pan-Amerika, Bank Pembangunan Asia, Tabung Kewangan Antarabangsa, dan Bank Dunia.

Menteri Kewangan mempunyai kuasa yang besar dengan semua bank dunia


Premise: We called upon the minister to use whatever means necessary, even if it meant creating a special category for these people, to allow them to seek refuge here; not to make them Canadian citizens, but simply to allow them sanctuary and safe refuge until they are able to return to where they properly belong.

Hypothesis: The immigrants were confined in their respective  camps

Even though the immigrants were allowed to remain in Canada we are not told about them being confined in the camps

Kami menyeru menteri untuk menggunakan apa sahaja cara yang perlu, walaupun ia bermakna mewujudkan kategori khas untuk mereka ini, untuk membolehkan mereka mencari perlindungan di sini; bukan untuk menjadikan mereka warga Kanada, tetapi semata-mata untuk membenarkan mereka tempat perlindungan dan perlindungan yang selamat sehingga mereka dapat kembali ke tempat mereka sepatutnya berada.

Pendatang itu dikurung di kem masing-masing


Premise: And what's happening is the level of pollution is increasing significantly. Now, here is the good news, Jim. If we take the leadership role and build the new technologies, like the new kinds of cars and trucks that Detroit is itching to build, then we can create millions of good new jobs by being first into the market with these new kinds of cars and trucks and other kinds of technologies.

Hypothesis: She hid out in the restroom.

Dan apa yang berlaku ialah tahap pencemaran meningkat dengan ketara. Sekarang, inilah berita baiknya, Jim. Jika kita mengambil peranan kepimpinan dan membina teknologi baharu, seperti jenis kereta dan trak baharu yang Detroit berminat untuk membina, maka kita boleh mencipta berjuta-juta pekerjaan baharu yang baik dengan menjadi yang pertama memasuki pasaran dengan jenis kereta dan trak baharu ini dan jenis teknologi lain.


Premise: If I think it's in our nation's strategic interest I'll commit troops. I thought it was in our strategic interests to keep Milosevic in check because of our relations in NATO, and that's why I took the position I took. I think it's important for NATO to be strong and confident. I felt like unchecked Milosevic would harm NATO, and so it depends on the situation, Mr. Vice President.

Hypothesis: The Vice President thinks an unchecked Milosevic would harm NATO.

The sentence doesn't say what the Vice President thinks.

Jika saya fikir ia adalah untuk kepentingan strategik negara kita, saya akan meletakkan tentera. Saya fikir ia adalah kepentingan strategik kami untuk memastikan Milosevic terkawal kerana hubungan kami dalam NATO, dan itulah sebabnya saya mengambil kedudukan yang saya ambil. Saya fikir penting untuk NATO menjadi kuat dan yakin. Saya rasa Milosevic yang tidak dikawal akan membahayakan NATO, jadi ia bergantung kepada keadaan, Encik Naib Presiden.

Naib Presiden berpendapat Milosevic yang tidak dikawal akan membahayakan NATO.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, what the member has failed to point out is that the number of jobs in Canada has jumped by 1.2 million since October 1993 because of a healthy economy, because we have put our fiscal house back in order, because we now have active measures to help workers back into the job market, because of 30,000 such jobs, and because of the transitional jobs fund in regions where unemployment was too high.

Hypothesis: The speaker wishes not to be addressed by name

The speaker isnt addressed by name but we do not know why

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, apa yang gagal dinyatakan oleh ahli ialah bilangan pekerjaan di Kanada telah melonjak sebanyak 1.2 juta sejak Oktober 1993 kerana ekonomi yang sihat, kerana kita telah menyusun semula rumah fiskal kita, kerana kita kini telah aktif. langkah-langkah untuk membantu pekerja kembali ke pasaran pekerjaan, kerana 30,000 pekerjaan sedemikian, dan kerana dana pekerjaan peralihan di wilayah di mana pengangguran terlalu tinggi.

Penceramah tidak mahu dipanggil dengan nama


Premise: I have reviewed the question as originally submitted on October 28 by the hon. member for Delta-South Richmond and have found that proper procedures were followed and that the recommendations to divide his question were made according to Standing Order 39(2) and based on the precedents of this place.

Hypothesis: This article is talking about an event that happened in 1995.

There is no information in the article as to what year this happened, so we don't know for sure. It's difficult perhaps because the year 1995 is pretty far from 2019, so this confused the system.

Saya telah menyemak soalan seperti yang dikemukakan pada 28 Oktober oleh hon. ahli Delta-South Richmond dan telah mendapati bahawa prosedur yang betul telah diikuti dan bahawa cadangan untuk membahagikan soalannya telah dibuat mengikut Peraturan Tetap 39(2) dan berdasarkan dahuluan tempat ini.

Artikel ini bercakap tentang peristiwa yang berlaku pada tahun 1995.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, just yesterday it was announced that the Atlantic Salmon Federation will be awarding the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans with the prestigious Atlantic Salmon Federation International Award which recognizes achievement in the field of Atlantic salmon conservation in the North Atlantic.

Hypothesis: There is an Atlantic Tuna Federation International Award.

There may be an award for tuna, or there may not be. Since the text only speaks about Salmon, it confused the agent.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, baru semalam diumumkan bahawa Persekutuan Salmon Atlantik akan menganugerahkan Anugerah Antarabangsa Persekutuan Salmon Atlantik yang berprestij kepada Menteri Perikanan dan Lautan yang mengiktiraf pencapaian dalam bidang pemuliharaan salmon Atlantik di Atlantik Utara.

Terdapat Anugerah Antarabangsa Persekutuan Tuna Atlantik.


Premise: I believe the best way to help our small businesses is not only through small-business loans, which we have increased since I've been the president of the United States, but to unbundle government contracts so people have a chance to be able to bid and receive a contract to help get their business going.

Hypothesis: The speaker in the text is George Bush.

We only know that the speaker is a president of the US, but we don't know which one because it's never explicitly mentioned. It's difficult perhaps because the system does know who the quote belongs to and therefore is able to answer it even though the text does not explicitly state it.

Saya percaya cara terbaik untuk membantu perniagaan kecil kami bukan sahaja melalui pinjaman perniagaan kecil, yang telah kami tingkatkan sejak saya menjadi presiden Amerika Syarikat, tetapi untuk menyahhimpunkan kontrak kerajaan supaya orang ramai berpeluang untuk membida dan menerima kontrak untuk membantu perniagaan mereka berjalan.

Penceramah dalam teks ialah George Bush.


Premise: The leadership in advocating these Young Offenders Act reforms has been provided in particular by the hon. member for Crowfoot, the hon. member for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, the hon. member for Surrey North, the hon. member for Langley-Abbotsford and many others of my colleagues.

Hypothesis: Anne McLellan had many colleagues who advocated these Young Offenders Act reforms.

it doesn't say whose colleagues these were so it is neither but I think the AI already knew so marked it correct

Kepimpinan dalam menyokong pembaharuan Akta Pesalah Muda ini telah disediakan khususnya oleh Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Crowfoot, hon. ahli untuk West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, hon. ahli untuk Surrey North, Yang Berhormat. ahli untuk Langley-Abbotsford dan ramai lagi rakan sekerja saya.

Anne McLellan mempunyai ramai rakan sekerja yang menyokong pembaharuan Akta Pesalah Muda ini.


Premise: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should implement a ``Regulatory Budget'', parallel to the traditional spending budget, which would detail estimates of the total cost of each individual regulation including the government enforcement costs as well as the cost of compliance to individual citizens and businesses; and include a risk/benefit analysis of each regulation, to enable cost/benefit analysis of regulation by parliamentarians.

Hypothesis: The government should have a budget no matter what the house thinks

the syatement may or may not be true, so it does fit

Bahawa, pada pendapat Dewan ini, kerajaan harus melaksanakan ``Bajet Kawal Selia', selari dengan belanjawan perbelanjaan tradisional, yang akan memperincikan anggaran jumlah kos setiap peraturan individu termasuk kos penguatkuasaan kerajaan serta kos. pematuhan kepada warganegara dan perniagaan individu; dan termasuk analisis risiko/faedah bagi setiap peraturan, untuk membolehkan analisis kos/faedah peraturan oleh ahli parlimen.

Kerajaan sepatutnya mempunyai bajet tidak kira apa yang difikirkan oleh rumah


Premise: I am not aware of the particular role that the Privy Council Office would play specifically in providing security arrangements, but I am sure that all of that information would come forward as soon as the Public Complaints Commission is allowed to get on with its work, and to hear from all of the relevant witnesses.

Hypothesis: Witnesses from the Privy Council Office will testify before the Public Complaints Commission

It is not stated who the witnesses are. I think the system got it wrong because it made an inappropriate inference

Saya tidak mengetahui peranan tertentu yang akan dimainkan oleh Pejabat Privy Council secara khusus dalam menyediakan pengaturan keselamatan, tetapi saya pasti bahawa semua maklumat itu akan dikemukakan sebaik sahaja Suruhanjaya Pengaduan Awam dibenarkan untuk meneruskan kerjanya, dan untuk mendengar daripada semua saksi yang berkaitan.

Saksi-saksi dari Pejabat Privy Council akan memberi keterangan di hadapan Suruhanjaya Pengaduan Awam


Premise: The policies of the Reform Party, the policies of the new Canadian alliance, are such that I believe Quebecers could live with them if they took the time to read them, study them and give them careful thought, and not simply say with a prejudiced point of view ``We are not going to listen to them''.

Hypothesis: the speaker lives in the great white north

we can't know for certain that the speaker is a canadian citizen or lives in canada, though it would seem they have some interest in canadian politics. It is possible they are an expat

Dasar Parti Pembaharuan, dasar pakatan baharu Kanada, adalah sedemikian rupa sehingga saya percaya orang Quebec boleh hidup bersama mereka jika mereka meluangkan masa untuk membacanya, mengkajinya dan memberi mereka pemikiran yang teliti, dan tidak hanya berkata dengan pandangan yang berprasangka. pandangan ``Kami tidak akan mendengar mereka''.

penceramah tinggal di utara putih yang hebat


Premise: Yes, yes. But it's not a statement about his heart. I don't claim to know his heart. I think he's a good person. I make no allegations about that. I believe him when he says that he has a good heart. I know enough about your story to admire a lot of the things that you have done as a person.

Hypothesis: Nobody said he had a good heart.

She is talking about personal opinions and we don't know if somebody had an input on this subject.

Ya, ya. Tetapi ia bukan kenyataan tentang hatinya. Saya tidak mengaku tahu hati dia. Saya rasa dia seorang yang baik. Saya tidak membuat dakwaan tentang itu. Saya percaya dia apabila dia berkata bahawa dia mempunyai hati yang baik. Saya cukup tahu tentang kisah anda untuk mengagumi banyak perkara yang telah anda lakukan sebagai seorang manusia.

Tiada siapa yang berkata dia mempunyai hati yang baik.


Premise: History will no doubt properly credit him and his government for their courage and foresight, initiatives such as the free trade agreement with the United States and NAFTA, abolishing the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and introducing the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax to spur exports.

Hypothesis: He is the president of the USA.

It is unclear who he is referring to in the statement. The system was confused by the context.

Sejarah sudah pasti akan memuji beliau dan kerajaannya atas keberanian dan pandangan jauh mereka, inisiatif seperti perjanjian perdagangan bebas dengan Amerika Syarikat dan NAFTA, memansuhkan cukai jualan pengeluar 13.5 peratus dan memperkenalkan penggunaan GST 7 peratus. cukai untuk merangsang eksport.


Premise: Let me comment on that. I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say this is the way it's got to be. We can help. And maybe it's just our difference in government, the way we view government. I want to empower the people.

Hypothesis: The United States tells others the way it's got to be.

The agent's opinion was that s/he doesn't believe the role of the United States is to tell others the way it's got to be. That doesn't mean that the United States does tell others the way it's got to be.

Biar saya ulas tentang itu. Saya tidak begitu pasti peranan Amerika Syarikat untuk mengelilingi dunia dan mengatakan ini adalah cara yang sepatutnya. Kami boleh bantu. Dan mungkin hanya perbezaan kita dalam kerajaan, cara kita memandang kerajaan. Saya mahu memperkasakan rakyat.

Amerika Syarikat memberitahu orang lain seperti yang sepatutnya.


Premise: No excuses. You must conform. In other words, there are practical things we can do. But it starts with working in a collaborative effort with states and local folks. If you own the land, every day is Earth Day. People care a lot about their land and care about their environment.

Hypothesis: The speaker owns land.

There is no indication that this is definitively the case, so he or she either may or may not own land of themselves.

Tiada alasan. Anda mesti akur. Dengan kata lain, ada perkara praktikal yang boleh kita lakukan. Tetapi ia bermula dengan bekerja dalam usaha kolaboratif dengan negeri dan penduduk tempatan. Jika anda memiliki tanah, setiap hari adalah Hari Bumi. Orang ramai sangat mengambil berat tentang tanah mereka dan mengambil berat tentang alam sekitar mereka.


Premise: I still believe it is very essential to once again look at what we have been able to achieve to judge where we want to go in the future and also to look at the kind of priorities and targets we can set in the forthcoming years in order to ensure that the investment and the commitment which Canadians have made over the past several years both under the UN and NATO can be fulfilled.

Hypothesis: There has been little investment into Nato and the UN.

The statement says they have invested into the UN and Nato, but doesn't claim if it is a small or large investment, therefore the statement I made that there has been little investment could be correct or incorrect.

Saya masih percaya adalah sangat penting untuk sekali lagi melihat apa yang telah kita capai untuk menilai ke mana kita mahu pergi pada masa hadapan dan juga untuk melihat jenis keutamaan dan sasaran yang boleh kita tetapkan pada tahun-tahun akan datang untuk memastikan bahawa pelaburan dan komitmen yang telah dibuat oleh warga Kanada sejak beberapa tahun lalu di bawah PBB dan NATO dapat dipenuhi.

Sebuah pesawat kecil menyebabkan letupan kimia semasa dalam perjalanan ke Kanada


Premise: Now, what was your reaction to what you saw and heard at the board meeting on or about -- I think you said June the 15th or 16th? I think, for the record, it's established that it's June the 14th. But tell us, what was your reaction to what you heard?

Hypothesis: The speaker does not have a calendar

We do not know if he has a calendar or not, only that he can't seem to get his dates straight.

Sekarang, apakah reaksi anda terhadap apa yang anda lihat dan dengar pada mesyuarat lembaga pada atau kira-kira -- saya rasa anda berkata pada 15 atau 16 Jun? Saya fikir, untuk rekod, ia telah ditetapkan pada 14 Jun. Tetapi beritahu kami, apakah reaksi anda terhadap apa yang anda dengar?


Premise: In addition to that, we're going to allow people 55 to 64 to buy into Medicare early. And most importantly, we give small business a 50 percent tax credit so that after we lower the costs of health care, they also get, whether they're self-employed or a small business, a lower cost to be able to cover their employees.

Hypothesis: This is from a discussion on candidates.

This might or might not have to do with candidates; it could be an op/ed piece, something from a sitting member of Congress, or anything else.

Selain itu, kami akan membenarkan orang berumur 55 hingga 64 untuk membeli Medicare lebih awal. Dan yang paling penting, kami memberi perniagaan kecil kredit cukai 50 peratus supaya selepas kami menurunkan kos penjagaan kesihatan, mereka juga mendapat, sama ada mereka bekerja sendiri atau perniagaan kecil, kos yang lebih rendah untuk dapat menampung pekerja mereka .

Ini daripada perbincangan mengenai calon.


Premise: The key is of course in the words of section 93 which are rooted in 19th century history and, to some extent of course, in 18th century history because that is where these particular provisions flowed from, the capitulations of 1759, the Treaty of Paris of 1763 and the Quebec Act of 1774.

Hypothesis: The Treaty of Paris of 1763 led to the Quebec Act of 1774.

While the Treaty of Paris of 1763 happened before the Quebec Act of 1774, we don't know if it "led to it", which implies causation. The model was fooled by the meaning of 'led to it'.

Kuncinya tentu saja dalam kata-kata seksyen 93 yang berakar umbi dalam sejarah abad ke-19 dan, pada tahap tertentu tentu saja, dalam sejarah abad ke-18 kerana dari situlah peruntukan-peruntukan khusus ini mengalir dari, kapitulasi 1759, Perjanjian Paris tentang 1763 dan Akta Quebec 1774.

Perjanjian Paris 1763 membawa kepada Akta Quebec 1774.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, so the member for Vaudreuil-Soulanges is very concerned that his own party could raise by 20% the number of Air Canada shares owned by a single shareholder, since, according to him, the Caisse de dpt et placement du Qubec could increase its holding of shares of this company to the point of taking control of it.

Hypothesis: The company resolved the problem

It does not say whether or not the company ever resolved the concerns.

Tuan Yang di-Pertua, jadi ahli untuk Vaudreuil-Soulanges sangat prihatin bahawa partinya sendiri boleh menaikkan sebanyak 20% jumlah saham Air Canada yang dimiliki oleh pemegang saham tunggal, kerana, menurutnya, Caisse de dpt et placement du Qubec boleh meningkatkan pegangan saham syarikat ini sehingga menguasainya.


Premise: New question. As I was saying. Both of you -- Governor, both of you have talked much about Medicare and health care for seniors. What about the more than 40 million younger Americans who do not have health insurance right now? What would you do about that?

Hypothesis: Younger American do not need health care because they are covered by their parents.

Some do need it but some are covered by parents.

Soalan baru. Seperti yang saya katakan. Anda berdua -- Gabenor, anda berdua telah banyak bercakap tentang Medicare dan penjagaan kesihatan untuk warga emas. Bagaimana pula dengan lebih 40 juta rakyat Amerika yang lebih muda yang tidak mempunyai insurans kesihatan sekarang? Apa yang anda akan lakukan tentang itu?

Orang Amerika yang lebih muda tidak memerlukan penjagaan kesihatan kerana mereka dilindungi oleh ibu bapa mereka.


Premise: We can close an achievement gap, and it starts with making sure we have strong accountability, Jim. One of the cornerstones of reform, and good reform, is to measure. Because when you measure you can ask the question, do they know? Is anybody being profiled?

Hypothesis: Jim profiles everyone he meets

The opening statement is directed at Jim however it doesn't state that he profiles people. He may or he may not

Kita boleh menutup jurang pencapaian, dan ia bermula dengan memastikan kita mempunyai akauntabiliti yang kukuh, Jim. Salah satu asas pembaharuan, dan pembaharuan yang baik, adalah untuk mengukur. Kerana apabila anda mengukur anda boleh bertanya soalan, adakah mereka tahu? Adakah sesiapa sedang diprofilkan?

Jim memprofilkan semua orang yang ditemuinya


Premise: Well, I don't know what the question is. It may relate to your standing objection, but we'll note that. We'll hold that thought, and you can proceed with the question, because all we have is the exhibit that is a newspaper article. So let's proceed with the question. There's no need to restate your objection, unless you want to put a finer point on the objection. But at this point, proceed with your question.

Hypothesis: An objection to a question will be noted in the future about the newspaper article exhibit.

We can't know for sure if another objection will be noted in the future about the newspaper article exhibit.

Nah, saya tidak tahu apa soalannya. Ia mungkin berkaitan dengan bantahan tetap anda, tetapi kami akan ambil perhatian bahawa. Kami akan memegang pemikiran itu, dan anda boleh meneruskan dengan soalan itu, kerana yang kami ada hanyalah pameran yang merupakan artikel akhbar. Jadi mari kita teruskan dengan soalan. Tidak perlu menyatakan semula bantahan anda, melainkan anda mahu meletakkan titik yang lebih halus pada bantahan itu. Tetapi pada ketika ini, teruskan dengan soalan anda.

David MacFarlane meninggal dunia pada abad ke-20.


Premise: I feel it's my duty, as a parent, to introduce any kind of faith-based concept to my children, not the Dover Area School District. While my children are small, you know, this policy is district-wide, and there's nothing to prevent it from being trickled down into the elementary level. It's just something that I feel strongly that my husband and I, that's our task to bring faith to our children.

Hypothesis: The author's children don't want to learn about faith-based concepts.

The statement is in the correct category because the excerpt doesn't give the opinion of the children. The system may have had difficulty because the kids are mentioned in the excerpt, although it doesn't give any specifics.

Saya rasa menjadi kewajipan saya, sebagai ibu bapa, untuk memperkenalkan apa-apa jenis konsep berasaskan kepercayaan kepada anak-anak saya, bukan Daerah Sekolah Dover Area. Walaupun anak-anak saya masih kecil, anda tahu, dasar ini adalah di seluruh daerah, dan tiada apa-apa yang menghalangnya daripada dicurahkan ke peringkat rendah. Ia hanya sesuatu yang saya rasa kuat bahawa saya dan suami, itulah tugas kami untuk membawa iman kepada anak-anak kami.

Anak-anak penulis tidak mahu belajar tentang konsep berasaskan akidah.


Premise: Let's go through some of the specifics now. New question. Vice President Gore, the governor mentioned the Middle East. Here we're talking at this stage in the game about diplomatic power that we have. What do you think the United States should do right now to resolve that conflict over there?

Hypothesis: The VP shouldnt be addressing diplomatic concerns

Mari kita lihat beberapa butirannya sekarang. Soalan baru. Naib Presiden Gore, gabenor menyebut Timur Tengah. Di sini kita bercakap pada peringkat ini dalam permainan tentang kuasa diplomatik yang kita ada. Apa yang anda fikir Amerika Syarikat perlu lakukan sekarang untuk menyelesaikan konflik di sana?

VP tidak sepatutnya menangani kebimbangan diplomatik


Premise: Farmers are going to find out how the decision was made to make a public announcement that our grain was not selling in Japan and why this government was unable to settle the labour negotiations to keep our grain moving; and not only settle negotiations, but in fact have legislation in place to facilitate grain movement.

Hypothesis: Grain is unhealthy.

No where in the statement does it say or discuss the health effects of grain consumption. Therefore judging the text solely at face value as we are meant to, the statement I made is neither correct nor incorrect. I believe the machine got it wrong because it couldn't understand the health effects of grain or locate it in the text.

Petani akan mengetahui bagaimana keputusan dibuat untuk membuat pengumuman awam bahawa bijirin kami tidak dijual di Jepun dan mengapa kerajaan ini tidak dapat menyelesaikan rundingan buruh untuk memastikan bijirin kami bergerak; dan bukan sahaja menyelesaikan rundingan, tetapi sebenarnya mempunyai undang-undang untuk memudahkan pergerakan bijirin.


Premise: In 1996 the governments of Canada and the Northwest Territories, the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation, the Inuvialuit Game Council, the Paulatuk Community Corporation and the Paulatuk Hunters and Trappers Committee signed an agreement to establish a national park in the Inuvialuit settlement region near Paulatuk in the Northwest Territories.

Hypothesis: Northwest Territories is not cold.

It is unclear if the Northwest Territories is cold or not. The system was confused by the context.

Pada tahun 1996 kerajaan Kanada dan Wilayah Barat Laut, Perbadanan Serantau Inuvialuit, Majlis Permainan Inuvialuit, Perbadanan Komuniti Paulatuk dan Jawatankuasa Pemburu dan Penjebak Paulatuk menandatangani perjanjian untuk menubuhkan taman negara di wilayah penempatan Inuvialuit berhampiran Paulatuk di Barat Laut. Wilayah.


Premise: I think the IMF has got a role in the world, but I don't want to see the IMF out there as a way to say to world bankers, if you make a bad loan, we'll bail you out. It needs to be available for emergency situations. I thought the President did the right thing with Mexico and was very strongly supportive of the administration in Mexico.

Hypothesis: The IMF bailed Mexico out.

This is not known from the information given. The system did not understand this.

Saya fikir IMF telah mendapat peranan di dunia, tetapi saya tidak mahu melihat IMF di luar sana sebagai satu cara untuk mengatakan kepada jurubank dunia, jika anda membuat pinjaman yang tidak baik, kami akan menyelamatkan anda. Ia perlu tersedia untuk situasi kecemasan. Saya fikir Presiden melakukan perkara yang betul dengan Mexico dan sangat menyokong pentadbiran di Mexico.


Premise: (d) to persons of Canadian citizenship who were members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, including the Prime Ministers of Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justices, and some Cabinet Ministers of Canada, including the Leader of the Government in the Senate 1921-1930, and 1935-1940, the Right Honourable Senator Raoul Dandurand, appointed to the United Kingdom Privy Council in 1941;

Hypothesis: Canada is not a tiny country

It does not say what the size of canada is.

(d) kepada orang berkewarganegaraan Kanada yang menjadi ahli Majlis Privy United Kingdom, termasuk Perdana Menteri Kanada, Ketua Hakim Negara Mahkamah Agung Kanada, dan beberapa Menteri Kabinet Kanada, termasuk Ketua Kerajaan dalam Senat 1921-1930, dan 1935-1940, Yang Amat Berhormat Senator Raoul Dandurand, dilantik ke Majlis Privy United Kingdom pada tahun 1941;