mengta666/huggingface_github huggingface dataset:
Issue: Data alteration when loading dataset with unspecified inner sequence length

### Describe the bug

When a dataset saved with a specified inner sequence length is loaded without specifying that length, the original data is altered and becomes inconsistent.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
from datasets import Dataset, Features, Value, Sequence, load_dataset

# Repository ID
repo_id = "my_repo_id"

# Define features with a specific length of 3 for each inner sequence
specified_features = Features({"key": Sequence(Sequence(Value("float32"), length=3))})

# Create a dataset with the specified features
data = [
    [[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], [4.0, 5.0, 6.0]],
    [[7.0, 8.0, 9.0], [10.0, 11.0, 12.0]],
]
dataset = Dataset.from_dict({"key": data}, features=specified_features)

# Push the dataset to the hub
dataset.push_to_hub(repo_id)

# Define features without specifying the length
unspecified_features = Features({"key": Sequence(Sequence(Value("float32")))})

# Load the dataset from the hub with this new feature definition
dataset = load_dataset(f"qgallouedec/{repo_id}", split="train", features=unspecified_features)

# The obtained data is altered
print(dataset.to_dict())  # {'key': [[[1.0], [2.0]], [[3.0], [4.0]]]}
```


### Expected behavior

```python
print(dataset.to_dict())  # {'key': [[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], [4.0, 5.0, 6.0]], [[7.0, 8.0, 9.0], [10.0, 11.0, 12.0]]]}
```

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: Linux-6.2.0-32-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- Python version: 3.9.12
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.15.1
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3

Comments:
While this issue may seem specific, it led to a silent problem in my workflow that took days to diagnose. If this feature is not intended to be supported, an error should be raised when encountering this configuration to prevent such issues.

Thanks for reporting! This is a MRE:

```python
import pyarrow as pa
from datasets.table import cast_array_to_feature
from datasets import Sequence, Value
data = [
    [[1.0, 2.0, 3.0], [4.0, 5.0, 6.0]],
    [[7.0, 8.0, 9.0], [10.0, 11.0, 12.0]],
]
arr = pa.array(data, pa.list_(pa.list_(pa.float32(), 3)))
cast_array_to_feature(arr, Sequence(Sequence(Value("float32"))))
```

I've opened a PR with a fix.
Issue: Dataloader stuck on multiple GPUs

### Describe the bug

I am trying to get CLIP to fine-tuning with my code.
When I tried to run it on multiple GPUs using accelerate, I encountered the following phenomenon.

- Validation dataloader stuck in 2nd epoch only on multi-GPU
Specifically, when the "for inputs in valid_loader:" process is finished, it does not proceed to the next step. train_loader process is completed. Also, both train and valid are working correctly in the first epoch.
The accelerate command at that time is as follows.
`accelerate launch --multi_gpu --num_processes=2 {script_name.py} {--arg1} {--arg2} ...`

- This will not happen when single GPU is used.
`CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES="0" accelerate launch {script_name.py} --arg1 --arg2 ...`
- Setting num_workers=0 in dataloader did not change the result.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. The codes for fine-tuning the regular CLIP were updated for accelerate.
2. Run the code with the accelerate command as `accelerate launch --multi_gpu --num_processes=2 {script_name.py} {--arg1} {--arg2} ...` and the above problem will occur.
3. CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES="0" accelerate launch {script_name.py} --arg1 --arg2 ...` , it works fine.

### Expected behavior

It Should end normally as if it was run on a single GPU.

### Environment info

Since `datasets-cli env` did not work, the environment is described below.

- OS: Ubuntu 22.04 with Docker
- Docker: 24.0.5, build ced0996
- Python: 3.10.12
- torch==2.0.1
- accelerate==0.21.0
- transformers==4.33.1

Comments:
What type of dataset are you using in this script? `torch.utils.data.Dataset` or `datasets.Dataset`? Please share the `datasets` package version if it's the latter. Otherwise, it's better to move this issue to the `accelerate` repo.

Very sorry, I thought I had a repo in `accelerate!`
I will close this issue and repo the issue in the appropriate place.
Issue: `dataset.filter` ALWAYS removes the first item from the dataset when using batched=True

### Describe the bug

If you call batched=True when calling `filter`, the first item is _always_ filtered out, regardless of the filter condition.



### Steps to reproduce the bug

Here's a minimal example:
```python
def filter_batch_always_true(batch, indices):
    print("First index being passed into this filter function: ", indices[0])
    return indices  # Keep all indices

data = {"value": list(range(10))}
dataset = Dataset.from_dict(data)

filtered_dataset = dataset.filter(filter_batch_always_true, with_indices=True, batched=True)
print("Length of original dataset: ", len(dataset))
print("Length of filtered_dataset: ", len(filtered_dataset))
print("Is equal to original? ", len(filtered_dataset) == len(dataset))
print("First item of filtered dataset: ", filtered_dataset[0])
print("Last item of filtered dataset: ", filtered_dataset[-1])
```
prints:
```
First index being passed into this filter function:  0
Length of original dataset:  10
Length of filtered_dataset:  9
Is equal to original?  False
First item of filtered dataset:  {'value': 1}
Last item of filtered dataset:  {'value': 9}
```

### Expected behavior

Filter should respect the filter condition.

### Environment info


- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: macOS-13.5-arm64-arm-64bit
- Python version: 3.9.18
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.17.1
- PyArrow version: 10.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.2


Comments:
`filter` treats the function's output as a (selection) mask - `True` keeps the sample, and `False` drops it. In your case, `bool(0)` evaluates to `False`, so dropping the first sample is the correct behavior.

Oh gosh! 🤦  I totally misunderstood the API! My apologies!
Issue: Tokenization with multiple workers is too slow

I am trying to tokenize a few million documents with multiple workers but the tokenization process is taking forever. 

Code snippet:

```
raw_datasets.map(
            encode_function,
            batched=False,
            num_proc=args.preprocessing_num_workers,
            load_from_cache_file=not args.overwrite_cache,
            remove_columns=[name for name in raw_datasets["train"].column_names if name not in ["input_ids", "labels", "attention_mask"]],
            desc="Tokenizing data",
        )
```

Details:

```
transformers==4.28.0.dev0
datasets==4.28.0.dev0
preprocessing_num_workers==48
```
tokenizer == decapoda-research/llama-7b-hf




Comments:
[This](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/nlp_process#map) is the most performant way to tokenize a dataset (`batched=True, num_proc=None, return_tensors="np"`) 

If`tokenizer.is_fast` returns `True`, `num_proc` must be `None/1` to benefit from the fast tokenizers' parallelism (the fast tokenizers are implemented in Rust, and Rust multi-threading doesn't work well with Python multi-processing)
Issue: Support buffer shuffle for to_tf_dataset

### Feature request

I'm using to_tf_dataset to convert a large dataset to tf.data.Dataset and use Keras fit to train model. 
Currently, to_tf_dataset only supports full size shuffle, which can be very slow on large dataset. 
tf.data.Dataset support buffer shuffle by default. 
shuffle(
    buffer_size, seed=None, reshuffle_each_iteration=None, name=None
)

### Motivation

I'm very frustrated to find the loading with shuffling large dataset is very slow. It seems impossible to shuffle before training Keras with big dataset. 

### Your contribution

NA

Comments:
cc @Rocketknight1 

Hey! You can implement this yourself, just:

1) Create the dataset with `to_tf_dataset()` with `shuffle=False`
2) Add an `unbatch()` at the end (or use batch_size=1)
3) Add a `shuffle()` to the resulting dataset with your desired buffer size
4) Add a `batch()` at the end again to re-batch your dataset.

Note that the way we construct datasets in `to_tf_dataset()`, we don't actually shuffle the entire dataset in-memory, using `tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()`! Instead, we shuffle an index array and then load from the dataset with that. This means that shuffling with `tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()` will probably be slower and use more memory than our approach - I don't think adding the option for smaller shuffle buffers will actually save you memory on this!

Thanks for your reply! @Rocketknight1 
"We don't actually shuffle the entire dataset in-memory, using tf.data.Dataset.shuffle()! Instead, we shuffle an index array and then load from the dataset with that."
In such case, there will be random access to dataset data during shuffling. When the dataset is large, the performance can be X10 times slow. I have tried many ways with to_tf_dataset() trying to achieve comparable performance with tf.data.Dataset().shuffle(buffer_size).batch(). But the performance with to_tf_dataset() is still slow.
Issue: Conversion from RGB to BGR in Object Detection tutorial

The [tutorial](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/object_detection) mentions the necessity of conversion the input image from BGR to RGB

> albumentations expects the image to be in BGR format, not RGB, so you’ll have to convert the image before applying the transform.

[Link to tutorial](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/0a068dbf3b446417ffd89d32857608394ec699e6/docs/source/object_detection.mdx#L77)

However, relevant albumentations' tutorials [on channels conversion](https://albumentations.ai/docs/examples/example/#read-the-image-from-the-disk-and-convert-it-from-the-bgr-color-space-to-the-rgb-color-space) and  [on boxes](https://albumentations.ai/docs/examples/example_bboxes/) imply that it's not really true no more.

I suggest removing this outdated conversion from the tutorial.

Comments:
Good catch!
Issue: Support saving datasets with custom formatting

Requested in https://discuss.huggingface.co/t/using-set-transform-on-a-dataset-leads-to-an-exception/53036.

I am not sure if supporting this is the best idea for the following reasons:

>For this to work, we would have to pickle a custom transform, which means the transform and the objects it references need to be serializable. Also, deserializing these bytes would make `load_from_disk` unsafe, so I'm not sure this is a good idea. 

@lhoestq WDYT?


Comments:
Not a fan of pickling this sort of stuff either.
Note that users can also share the code in their dataset documentation.
Issue: `Dataset.to_dict()` ignore `decode=True` with Image feature

### Describe the bug

`Dataset.to_dict` seems to ignore the decoding instruction passed in features.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
import datasets
import numpy as np
from PIL import Image

img = np.random.randint(0, 256, (5, 5, 3), dtype=np.uint8)
img = Image.fromarray(img)

features = datasets.Features({"image": datasets.Image(decode=True)})
dataset = datasets.Dataset.from_dict({"image": [img]}, features=features)
print({key: dataset[key] for key in dataset.column_names})
# {'image': [<PIL.PngImagePlugin.PngImageFile image mode=RGB size=5x5 at 0x7EFBC80E15B0>]}
print(dataset.to_dict())
# {'image': [{'bytes': b'\x89PNG\r\n\x1a\n\x00\x00\x00\rIHDR\x00\x00\x00\x05\x00\x00\x00\x05\x08\x02\x00\x00\x00\x02\r\xb1\xb2\x00\x00\x00[IDATx\x9c\x01P\x00\xaf\xff\x01\x13\x1b<7\xe7\xe0\xdc^6\xed\x04\xc7M\xd2\x9f\x00X\x1b\xb0?\x1ba\x15\xc5 o\xd0\x80\xbe\x19/\x01\xec\x95\x1f\x9f\xffj\xfa1\xa7\xc4X\xea\xbe\xa4g\x00\xc4\x15\xdeC\xc7 \xbbaqe\xc8\xb9\xa9q\xe7\x00,?M\xc0)\xdaD`}\xb1\xdci\x1e\xafC\xa9]%.@\xa6\xf0\xb3\x00\x00\x00\x00IEND\xaeB`\x82', 'path': None}]}
```




### Expected behavior

I would expect `{key: dataset[key] for key in dataset.column_names}` and `dataset.to_dict()` to be equivalent. If the previous behavior is expected, then it should be stated [in the doc](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/v2.14.4/en/package_reference/main_classes#datasets.Dataset.to_dict).

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: Linux-6.2.0-31-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- Python version: 3.9.12
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.15.1
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3
- Pillow 9.5.0
- numpy 1.25.2

Comments:
We need to implement the `Image` type as a PyArrow extension type (to allow us to override the Python conversion) for this to work as expected. For now, it's best to use your approach indeed.
Issue: avoid downgrading jax version

### Feature request

Whenever I `pip install datasets[jax]` it downgrades jax to version 0.3.25. I seem to be able to install this library first then upgrade jax back to version 0.4.13.

### Motivation

It would be nice to not overwrite currently installed version of jax if possible.

### Your contribution

I would be willing to beta test. Or maybe write some code if I could get pointed in the right direction, I'm not super familiar with this codebase.

Comments:
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/main/setup.py#L236
Currently has the highest version at 0.3.25; Not sure if there is any reason for this, other than that was the tested version?
Issue: Use load_dataset for local json files, but it not works

### Describe the bug

when I use load_dataset to load my local datasets，it always goes to Hugging Face to download the data instead of loading the local dataset.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

`raw_datasets = load_dataset(
        ‘json’,
        data_files=data_files)`


### Expected behavior

![image](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/50519434/add3747f-6481-4da7-b374-8f81c5a6472c)


### Environment info

python version 3.8.5
datasets version 2.12
os version unbuntu 18.04

Comments:
Hugging Face's datasets library may prioritize remote configurations. Make sure there are no conflicting configurations causing the library to prefer downloading data
May  be try debugging
raw_datasets = load_dataset('json', data_files=data_files)
print(raw_datasets)


It doesn't download them but writes them to the local HF cache. The logging could indeed be better. Does loading the dataset succeed? If it doesn't, can you share the error stack trace?
Issue: ValueError: 'index=True' is only valid when 'orient' is 'split', 'table', 'index', or 'columns'

### Describe the bug

Saving a dataset `.to_json()` fails with a `ValueError` since the latest `pandas` [release](https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/dev/whatsnew/v2.1.0.html) (`2.1.0`)

In their latest release we have:

> Improved error handling when using [DataFrame.to_json()](https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/dev/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.to_json.html#pandas.DataFrame.to_json) with incompatible index and orient arguments ([GH 52143](https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/52143))

i.e. an error is now raised for invalid combinations of `index` and `orient`.

This means that unfortunately the custom logic at this line might sometimes lead to contradictions:

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/029227a116c14720afca71b9b22e78eb2a1c09a6/src/datasets/io/json.py#L96

e.g. for the default case `orient=records` leads to `index=True`, which now raises a `ValueError`

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
import datasets


if __name__ == '__main__':

    dataset = datasets.Dataset.from_dict({"A": [1, 2, 3], "B": [4, 5, 6]})
    dataset.to_json("dataset.json")
```

```shell
>>>
ValueError: 'index=True' is only valid when 'orient' is 'split', 'table', 'index', or 'columns'.
```

### Expected behavior

The dataset is successfully saved as `.json`

### Environment info

`python >= 3.9`
`pandas >= 2.1.0`

Comments:
Thanks for reporting. We are investigating it.

This issue is caused by latest `pandas` release 2.1.0 (released yesterday Aug 30).

See: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/actions/runs/6035484010/job/16375932085?pr=6198


People using previous releases of `datasets` should pin `pandas` in their local environment:
```
python -m pip install 'pandas<2.1.0'
```
Issue: Dataset loading script method does not work with .pyc file

### Describe the bug

The huggingface dataset library specifically looks for ‘.py’ file while loading the dataset using loading script approach and it does not work with ‘.pyc’ file.
While deploying in production, it becomes an issue when we are restricted to use only .pyc files. Is there any work around for this ?

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Create a dataset  loading script to read the custom data.
2. compile the code to make sure that .pyc file is created 
3. Delete the loading script and re-run the code. Usually, python should make use of complied .pyc files. However, in this case, the dataset library errors out with the message that it's unable to find the data loader loading script.

### Expected behavior

The code should make use of .pyc file and run without any error.

### Environment info

NA

Comments:
Before dynamically loading `.py` scripts with `importlib.import_module`, we also parse their contents to check imports, which is tricky to implement for binary `.pyc` files (requires parsing bytecode), so I don't think this is something we want to support (unless more users request it ofc) as this use case is a bit too specific.

@lhoestq What's your opinion on this?

> Before dynamically loading .py scripts with importlib.import_module, we also parse their contents to check imports, which is tricky to implement for binary .pyc files (requires parsing bytecode), so I don't think this is something we want to support (unless more users request it ofc) as this use case is a bit too specific.

Yes indeed. Though you can use a .py that imports a package that contains your .pyc code and that you previously installed

Hi @lhoestq ,
Could you share some example code related to the approach that you are suggesting?
Issue: `Invalid user token` even when correct user token is passed!

### Describe the bug

I'm working on a dataset which comprises other datasets on the hub.
URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-asr-leaderboard/datasets-test-only

Note: Some of the sub-datasets in this metadataset require explicit access.

All the other datasets work fine, except, `common_voice`.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

https://github.com/Vaibhavs10/scratchpad/blob/main/cv_datasets_bug_repro.ipynb

### Expected behavior

It should work if the provided access token is valid (as it does for all the other datasets)

### Environment info

datasets version -> 2.14.4

Comments:
This is because `download_config.use_auth_token` is deprecated - you should use `download_config.token` instead

Works! Thanks for the quick fix! <3
Issue: [Feature Request] Check the length of batch before writing so that empty batch is allowed

### Use Case
I use `dataset.map(process_fn, batched=True)` to process the dataset, with data **augmentations or filtering**. However, when all examples within a batch is filtered out, i.e. **an empty batch is returned**, the following error will be thrown:
  ```
  ValueError: Schema and number of arrays unequal
  ```
This is because the empty batch does not comply with the schema of other batches. I think an empty batch should be allowed to facilitate coding (one does not need to assign an empty list manually for all keys.)

A simple fix is to check the length of `batch` before writing:
```
if len(batch):
  writer.write_batch(batch)
```
instead of 

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/74d60213dcbd7c99484c62ce1d3dfd90a1df0770/src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py#L3493


Comments:
I think this error means you filter all examples within an (input) batch by deleting its columns. In that case, to avoid the error, you can set the column value to an empty list (`input_batch["col"] = []`) instead.
Issue: Error in saving the PIL image into *.arrow files using datasets.arrow_writer

### Describe the bug

I am using the ArrowWriter from datasets.arrow_writer to save a json-style file as arrow files. Within the dictionary, it contains a feature called "image" which is a list of PIL.Image objects.
I am saving the json using the following script:
```
def save_to_arrow(path,temp):
    with ArrowWriter(path=path,writer_batch_size=20) as writer: 
        writer.write_batch(temp) 
        writer.finalize() 
```
However, when I attempt to restore the dataset and use the ```Dataset.from_file(path)``` function to load the arrow file, there seems to be an issue with the PIL.Image object in the dataset. The list of PIL.Images appears as follows rather than a normal PIL.Image object:
![1693051705440](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/14247682/03b204c2-d0fa-4d19-beff-6f4d7b83c848)


### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Storing the data json into arrow files:
```
def save_to_arrow(path,temp):
    with ArrowWriter(path=path,writer_batch_size=20) as writer: 
        writer.write_batch(temp) 
        writer.finalize() 
save_to_arrow( path, json_file )
```
2.  try to load the arrow file into the Dataset object using the ```Dataset.from_file(path)```


### Expected behavior

Except to saving the contained "image" feature as a list PIL.Image objects as the arrow file. And I can restore the dataset from the file.

### Environment info


- `datasets` version: 2.12.0
- Platform: Linux-5.4.0-150-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.17
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.4.4

Comments:
You can cast the `input_image` column to the `Image` type to fix the issue:
```python
ds.cast_column("input_image", datasets.Image())
```
Issue: Map cache does not detect function changes in another module

```python
# dataset.py
import os
import datasets

if not os.path.exists('/tmp/test.json'):
  with open('/tmp/test.json', 'w') as file:
    file.write('[{"text": "hello"}]')

def transform(example):
  text = example['text']
  # text += ' world'
  return {'text': text}

data = datasets.load_dataset('json', data_files=['/tmp/test.json'], split='train')
data = data.map(transform)
```

```python
# test.py
import dataset
print(next(iter(dataset.data)))
```

Initialize cache
```
python3 test.py
# {'text': 'hello'}
```

Edit dataset.py and uncomment the commented line, run again
```
python3 test.py
# {'text': 'hello'}
# expected: {'text': 'hello world'}
```

Clear cache and run again
```
rm -rf ~/.cache/huggingface/datasets/*
python3 test.py
# {'text': 'hello world'}
```


If instead the two files are combined, then changes to the function are detected correctly. But it's expected when working on any realistic codebase that things will be modularized into separate files.

Comments:
This issue is a duplicate of https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/3297.  This is a limitation of `dill`, a package we use for caching (non-`__main__` module objects are serialized by reference). You can find more info about it here: https://github.com/uqfoundation/dill/issues/424.

In your case, moving 
```
data = datasets.load_dataset('json', data_files=['/tmp/test.json'], split='train')
data = data.map(transform)
``` 
to `test.py`  and setting `transform.__module__ = None` at the end of `dataset.py` should fix the issue.

I understand this may be a limitation of an upstream tool, but for a user for datasets this is very annoying, as when you have dozens of different datasets with different preprocessing functions you can't really move them all into the same file. It may be worth seeing if there is a way to specialize the dependency (eg. subclass it) and enforce behaviors that makes sense for your product.

I was able to work around this for now by setting `__module__ = None`. If such workarounds are required for now it may be better to document it somewhere than a single obscure issue from a long time ago.

As this is a duplicate issue I'm closing it.

I have another issue with the cache https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6179 can you take a look?
Issue: Loading Meteor metric in HF evaluate module crashes due to datasets import issue 

### Describe the bug

When using python3.9 and ```evaluate``` module loading Meteor metric crashes at a non-existent import from ```datasets.config``` in ```datasets v2.14```

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```
from evaluate import load
meteor = load("meteor")
```

produces the following error:
  ```
    from datasets.config import importlib_metadata, version
ImportError: cannot import name 'importlib_metadata' from 'datasets.config' (<path_to_project>/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/config.py)
```

### Expected behavior

```datasets``` of v2.10 has the following workaround in ```config.py```:

```
if PY_VERSION < version.parse("3.8"):
    import importlib_metadata
else:
    import importlib.metadata as importlib_metadata
```

However, it's absent in v2.14 which might be the cause of the issue.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: macOS-13.5-arm64-arm-64bit
- Python version: 3.9.6
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3
- Evaluate version: 0.4.0

Comments:
Our minimal Python version requirement is 3.8, so we dropped `importlib_metadata`. 

Feel free to open a PR in the `evaluate` repo to replace the problematic import with
```python
if PY_VERSION < version.parse("3.8"):
    import importlib_metadata
else:
    import importlib.metadata as importlib_metadata
```

Any idea when you guys will release the next version which deals with this problem?
I'm still having the same issue with py 3.10 when I install the lib with pip.
I'm assuming that it has not yet been updated since the merge was 3 days ago.

Yes, this requires a new `evaluate` release (cc @lvwerra for this). 

In the meantime, you can get the fixed version by installing `evaluate` from `main`: `pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/evaluate.git`

I'll aim for a release this week!
Issue: 'import datasets' throws "invalid syntax error"

### Describe the bug

Hi,

I have been trying to import the datasets library but I keep gtting this error.

`Traceback (most recent call last):

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py:3508 in run_code
    exec(code_obj, self.user_global_ns, self.user_ns)

  Cell In[2], line 1
    import datasets

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/__init__.py:22
    from .arrow_dataset import Dataset

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_dataset.py:67
    from .arrow_writer import ArrowWriter, OptimizedTypedSequence

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py:27
    from .features import Features, Image, Value

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/__init__.py:17
    from .audio import Audio

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/audio.py:11
    from ..download.streaming_download_manager import xopen, xsplitext

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/download/__init__.py:10
    from .streaming_download_manager import StreamingDownloadManager

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/download/streaming_download_manager.py:18
    from aiohttp.client_exceptions import ClientError

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/aiohttp/__init__.py:7
    from .connector import *  # noqa

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/aiohttp/connector.py:12
    from .client import ClientRequest

  File /opt/local/jupyterhub/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/aiohttp/client.py:144
    yield from asyncio.async(resp.release(), loop=loop)
                       ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax`

I have simply used these commands:
`import datasets`
and
`from datasets import load_dataset`

### Environment info

The library has been installed a virtual machine on JupyterHub. Although I have used this library multiple times (on the same VM) before, to train/test an ASR or other ML models, I had never encountered this error. 

Comments:
This seems to be related to your environment and not the `datasets` code (e.g., this could happen when exposing the  Python 3.9 site packages to a lower Python version (interpreter))
Issue: Configurations in yaml not working

### Dataset configurations cannot be created in YAML/README

Hello! I'm trying to follow the docs here in order to create structure in my dataset as added from here (#5331): https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/8b8e6ee067eb74e7965ca2a6768f15f9398cb7c8/docs/source/repository_structure.mdx#L110-L118

I have the exact example in my config file for [my data repo](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tsor13/test):
```
configs:
- config_name: main_data
  data_files: "main_data.csv"
- config_name: additional_data
  data_files: "additional_data.csv"
```

Yet, I'm unable to load different configurations:
```
from datasets import get_dataset_config_names
get_dataset_config_names('tsor13/test', use_auth_token=True)
```
returns a single split, `['tsor13--test']`

Does anyone have any insights?

@polinaeterna thank you for adding this feature, it is super useful. Do you happen to have any ideas?

### Steps to reproduce the bug

from datasets import get_dataset_config_names
get_dataset_config_names('tsor13/test')

### Expected behavior

I would expect there to be two splits, `main_data` and `additional_data`. However, only `['tsor13--test']` test is returned.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: macOS-13.4-arm64-arm-64bit
- Python version: 3.11.4
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.5.1

Comments:
Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this behavior on my machine or Colab - the reproducer returns `['main_data', 'additional_data']` as expected.

Thank you for looking into this, Mario. Is this on [my repository](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tsor13/test), or on another one that you have reproduced? Would you mind pointing me to it if so?

Whoa, in colab I received the correct behavior using my dataset. It must have something to do with my local copy of `datasets` (which again just failed).

I've tried uninstalling/reinstnalling to no avail

hi @tsor13 , I haven't been able to reproduce your issue on `tsor13/test` dataset locally either. reinstalling doesn't help?
Issue: Error type: ArrowInvalid Details: Failed to parse string: '[254,254]' as a scalar of type int32

### Describe the bug

I am getting the following error while I am trying to upload the CSV sheet to train a model. My CSV sheet content is exactly same as shown in the example CSV file in the Auto Train page. Attaching screenshot of error for reference. I have also tried converting the index of the answer that are integer into string by placing inverted commas and also without inverted commas. 
Can anyone please help me out? 
FYI : I am using Chrome browser.

Error type: ArrowInvalid
Details: Failed to parse string: '[254,254]' as a scalar of type int32

![Screenshot 2023-08-19 165827](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/90616801/95fad96e-7dce-4bb5-9f83-9f1659a32891)


### Steps to reproduce the bug

Kindly let me know how to fix this?

### Expected behavior

Kindly let me know how to fix this?

### Environment info

Kindly let me know how to fix this?

Comments:
Answered on the forum [here](https://discuss.huggingface.co/t/error-type-arrowinvalid-details-failed-to-parse-string-254-254-as-a-scalar-of-type-int32/51323).
Issue: Add `BoundingBox` feature

... to make working with object detection datasets easier. Currently, `Sequence(int_or_float, length=4)` can be used to represent this feature optimally (in the storage backend), so I only see this feature being useful if we make it work with the viewer. Also, bounding boxes usually come in 4 different formats (explained [here](https://albumentations.ai/docs/getting_started/bounding_boxes_augmentation/)), so we need to decide which one to support (or maybe all of them).

cc @NielsRogge @severo

Comments:
My proposal would look like this:

```python
from datasets import load_dataset
from datasets.features import Sequence, BboxFeature

# load images along with boxes
dataset = load_dataset("imagefolder", data_dir="/path/to/folder", split="train")

# map the boxes column to the appropriate format
dataset = dataset.map(lambda example: map_to_ymin_xmin_ymax_xmax(example))

# cast to feature
dataset = dataset.cast_column('boxes', Sequence(BboxFeature))
````
We could for instance make [BboxFeature](https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/api_docs/python/tfds/features/BBoxFeature) default to normalized coordinates in the ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax format. This is just one of the many different formats of bounding boxes, so we would for instance default to the format used by Tensorflow datasets.
Issue: Why not use self._epoch as seed to shuffle in distributed training with IterableDataset

### Describe the bug

Currently, distributed training with `IterableDataset` needs to pass fixed seed to shuffle to keep each node use the same seed to avoid overlapping.
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/a7f8d9019e7cb104eac4106bdc6ec0292f0dc61a/src/datasets/iterable_dataset.py#L1174-L1177

My question is why not directly use `self._epoch` which is set by `set_epoch` as seed? It's almost the same across nodes.
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/a7f8d9019e7cb104eac4106bdc6ec0292f0dc61a/src/datasets/iterable_dataset.py#L1790-L1801

If not using `self._epoch` as shuffling seed, what does this method do to prepare an epoch seeded generator?
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/a7f8d9019e7cb104eac4106bdc6ec0292f0dc61a/src/datasets/iterable_dataset.py#L1206



### Steps to reproduce the bug

As mentioned above.

### Expected behavior

As mentioned above.

### Environment info

Not related

Comments:
@lhoestq 

`_effective_generator` returns a RNG that takes into account `self._epoch` and the current dataset's base shuffling RNG (which can be set by specifying `seed=` in `.shuffle() for example`).

To fix your error you can pass `seed=` to `.shuffle()`. And the shuffling will depend on both this seed and `self._epoch`

Thanks for the reply
Issue: FolderBase Dataset automatically resolves under current directory when data_dir is not specified

### Describe the bug

FolderBase Dataset automatically resolves under current directory when data_dir is not specified.

For example:
```
load_dataset("audiofolder")
```
takes long time to resolve and collect data_files from current directory. But I think it should reach out to this line for error handling https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/cb8c5de5145c7e7eee65391cb7f4d92f0d565d62/src/datasets/packaged_modules/folder_based_builder/folder_based_builder.py#L58-L59

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```
load_dataset("audiofolder")
```

### Expected behavior

Error report

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: Linux-5.15.0-78-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.15
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.5.3

Comments:
@lhoestq 

Makes sense, I guess this can be fixed in the load_dataset_builder method.
It concerns every packaged builder I think (see values in `_PACKAGED_DATASETS_MODULES`)

I think the behavior is related to these lines, which short circuited the error handling.
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/664a1cb72ea1e6ef7c47e671e2686ca4a35e8d63/src/datasets/load.py#L946-L952

So should data_dir be checked here or still delegating to actual `DatasetModule`? In that case, how to properly set `data_files` here.

This is location in PackagedDatasetModuleFactory.get_module seems the be the right place to check if at least data_dir or data_files are passed

@mariosasko can you please assign this issue to me,I want to work on this

#self-assign

@mariosasko is this issue still open? i would love to kickstart my journey to open source with this issue!
Regards
zutarich

@zutarich It is unless @debrupf2946 is working on it.

#self-assign

I am working and will open a pull request soon @Etelis 


@mariosasko can i take this up? 

#self-assign

Yes, feel free to work on this :)

i think its working as expected . Heres the log i get for the same line -

![image](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/63234112/8a857ec5-8dd0-4b01-b3a7-7c93444b9558)


#self-assign

Hey! I saw that PR #7314 fixed the issue when no matching data files are found, which is great. But I think the builder still defaults to the current directory when `data_dir` isn't specified, which could lead to unexpected behavior.

If no one’s actively working on that part, I’d be happy to pick it up and propose a fix. Let me know if that works!


Cool, feel free to ping me if you open a PR @aniyagnik :)

Hey! I noticed this is still open and unresolved. I’d like to take this up and submit a PR to prevent resolving to the current directory when data_dir is not specified!!!

Hi @aniyagnik @npuichigo @sahillihas @lhoestq @mariosasko,
I've opened a PR to address the issue discussed in #6152 by adding an early validation check for folder-based datasets. Would appreciate your review whenever convenient. Thanks!

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/7618
Issue: Faster sorting for single key items

### Feature request

A faster way to sort a dataset which contains a large number of rows.

### Motivation

The current sorting implementations took significantly longer than expected when I was running on a dataset trying to sort by timestamps. 

**Code snippet:**
```python
ds = datasets.load_dataset( "json", **{"data_files": {"train": "path-to-jsonlines"}, "split": "train"}, num_proc=os.cpu_count(), keep_in_memory=True) 
sorted_ds = ds.sort("pubDate", keep_in_memory=True)
```

However, once I switched to a different method which
1. unpacked to a list of tuples
2. sorted tuples by key
3. run `.select` with the sorted list of indices
It was significantly faster (orders of magnitude, especially with M's of rows)

### Your contribution

I'd be happy to implement a crude single key sorting algorithm so that other users can benefit from this trick. Broadly, this would take a `Dataset` and perform;

```python
# ds is a Dataset object
# key_name is the sorting key

class Dataset:
   ...
   def _sort(key_name: str) -> Dataset:
      index_keys = [(i,x) for i,x in enumerate(self[key_name])]
      sorted_rows = sorted(row_pubdate, key=lambda x: x[1])
      sorted_indicies = [x[0] for x in sorted_rows]
      return self.select(sorted_indicies)
```

Comments:
`Dataset.sort` essentially does the same thing except it uses `pyarrow.compute.sort_indices` which doesn't involve copying the data into python objects (saving memory)

```python
sort_keys = [(col, "ascending") for col in column_names]
indices = pc.sort_indices(self.data, sort_keys=sort_keys)
return self.select(indices)
```

Ok interesting, I'll continue debugging to see what is going wrong on my end.
Issue: Allow dataset implement .take

### Feature request

I want to do:
```
dataset.take(512)
```

but it only works with streaming = True

### Motivation

uniform interface to data sets. Really surprising the above only works with streaming = True. 

### Your contribution

Should be trivial to copy paste the IterableDataset .take to use the local path in the data (when streaming = False)

Comments:
```
    dataset = IterableDataset(dataset) if type(dataset) != IterableDataset else dataset  # to force dataset.take(batch_size) to work in non-streaming mode
   ```


hf discuss: https://discuss.huggingface.co/t/how-does-one-make-dataset-take-512-work-with-streaming-false-with-hugging-face-data-set/50770

so: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76902824/how-does-one-make-dataset-take512-work-with-streaming-false-with-hugging-fac

Feel free to work on this. In addition, `IterableDataset` supports `skip`, so we should also add this method to `Dataset`.
Issue: Dataset.from_parquet cannot load subset of columns

### Describe the bug

When using `Dataset.from_parquet(path_or_paths, columns=[...])` and a subset of columns, loading fails with a variant of the following

```
ValueError: Couldn't cast
a: int64
-- schema metadata --
pandas: '{"index_columns": [], "column_indexes": [], "columns": [{"name":' + 273
to
{'a': Value(dtype='int64', id=None), 'b': Value(dtype='int64', id=None)}
because column names don't match

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
```

Looks to be triggered by https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/c02a44715c036b5261686669727394b1308a3a4b/src/datasets/table.py#L2285-L2286

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```
import pandas as pd
from datasets import Dataset


pd.DataFrame([{"a": 1, "b": 2}]).to_parquet("test.pq")
Dataset.from_parquet("test.pq", columns=["a"])
```

### Expected behavior

A subset of columns should be loaded without error

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: Linux-5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64-x86_64-with-glibc2.2.5
- Python version: 3.8.16
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3

Comments:
Looks like this regression was introduced in `datasets==2.13.0` (`2.12.0` could load a subset of columns)

This does not appear to be fixed by https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/6045 (bug still exists on `main`)
Issue: ValueError when running BeamBasedBuilder with GCS path in cache_dir

### Describe the bug

When running the BeamBasedBuilder with a GCS path specified in the cache_dir, the following ValueError occurs:

```
ValueError: Unable to get filesystem from specified path, please use the correct path or ensure the required dependency is installed, e.g., pip install apache-beam[gcp]. Path specified: gcs://my-bucket/huggingface_datasets/my_beam_dataset/default/0.0.0/my_beam_dataset-train [while running 'train/Save to parquet/Write/WriteImpl/InitializeWrite']
```

Same error occurs after running `pip install apache-beam[gcp]` as instructed.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Put `my_beam_dataset.py`:

```python
import datasets


class MyBeamDataset(datasets.BeamBasedBuilder):
    def _info(self):
        features = datasets.Features({"value": datasets.Value("int64")})
        return datasets.DatasetInfo(features=features)

    def _split_generators(self, dl_manager, pipeline):
        return [datasets.SplitGenerator(name=datasets.Split.TRAIN, gen_kwargs={})]

    def _build_pcollection(self, pipeline):
        import apache_beam as beam

        return pipeline | beam.Create([{"value": i} for i in range(10)])
```

Run:
```bash
datasets-cli run_beam my_beam_dataset.py --cache_dir=gs://my-bucket/huggingface_datasets/ --beam_pipeline_options="runner=DirectRunner"
```

### Expected behavior

Running the BeamBasedBuilder with a GCS cache path without any errors.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: macOS-13.4-arm64-arm-64bit
- Python version: 3.9.17
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 9.0.0
- Pandas version: 2.0.3

Comments:
The cause of the error seems to be that `datasets` adds "gcs://" as a schema, while `beam` checks only "gs://".

datasets: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/c02a44715c036b5261686669727394b1308a3a4b/src/datasets/builder.py#L822

beam: [link](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/25e1a64641b1c8a3c0a6c75c6e86031b87307f22/sdks/python/apache_beam/io/filesystems.py#L98-L101)
```
      systems = [
          fs for fs in FileSystem.get_all_subclasses()
          if fs.scheme() == path_scheme
      ]
```

Hi! We've deprecated the Beam API, as we don't have the bandwidth to support it properly...
Issue: custom load dataset to hub

### System Info

kaggle notebook

i transformed dataset:
```
dataset = load_dataset("Dahoas/first-instruct-human-assistant-prompt")
```
to 
formatted_dataset: 
```
Dataset({
    features: ['message_tree_id', 'message_tree_text'],
    num_rows: 33143
})
```
but would like to know how to upload to hub

### Who can help?

@ArthurZucker @younesbelkada

### Information

- [ ] The official example scripts
- [ ] My own modified scripts

### Tasks

- [ ] An officially supported task in the `examples` folder (such as GLUE/SQuAD, ...)
- [ ] My own task or dataset (give details below)

### Reproduction

shared above

### Expected behavior

load dataset to hub

Comments:
This is an issue for the [Datasets repo](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets).

> This is an issue for the [Datasets repo](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets).

Thanks @sgugger , I guess I will wait for them to address the issue . Looking forward to hearing from them 

You can use `.push_to_hub("<username>/<repo>")` to push a `Dataset` to the Hub.

> You can use `.push_to_hub("<username>/<repo>")` to push a `Dataset` to the Hub.

how about subset? like `.load_dataset("<username>/<repo>", "<subset>")`, how can I upload multi-dataset in one repo? thanks a lot ! 

> > You can use `.push_to_hub("<username>/<repo>")` to push a `Dataset` to the Hub.
> 
> how about subset? like `.load_dataset("<username>/<repo>", "<subset>")`, how can I upload multi-dataset in one repo? thanks a lot !

I solved it by upgrading `Datasets` version to 2.15.0
Issue: Offline dataset viewer

### Feature request

The dataset viewer feature is very nice. It enables to the user to easily view the dataset. However, when working for private companies we cannot always upload the dataset to the hub. Is there a way to create dataset viewer offline? I.e. to run a code that will open some kind of html or something that makes it easy to view the dataset.

### Motivation

I want to easily view my dataset even when it is hosted locally.

### Your contribution

N.A.

Comments:
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. It's not possible at the moment. The viewer is part of the Hub codebase and only works on public datasets. Also, it relies on [Datasets Server](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets-server/), which prepares the data and provides an API to access the rows, size, etc.

If you're interested in hosting your data as a private dataset on the Hub, you might want to look at https://github.com/huggingface/datasets-server/issues/39.

Hi, we are building an offline dataset viewer: https://github.com/Renumics/spotlight
It supports many HF datasets, but currently you have to use it via Pandas:
df=ds.to_pandas()
spotlight.show(df)

Would love to hear from you if that works for your use case. If not, feel free to open an issue on the repo: https://github.com/Renumics/spotlight/issues

@ssuwelack thank you! I will definitely try it out.

Related issues:
- https://github.com/huggingface/datasets-server/issues/213
- https://github.com/huggingface/datasets-server/issues/441
- https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6014

Closing for now, as developing and maintaining an offline viewer is not planned.

@yuvalkirstain the dataset viewer is now available on private datasets for [PRO users](https://huggingface.co/pricing#pro) and [Enterprise Hub orgs](https://huggingface.co/enterprise). Would it fit your needs?

Hi @ssuwelack I tried loading a HF dataset with your viewer but got this error https://github.com/Renumics/spotlight/issues/461 hope the team can help me on this. Thanks!
Issue: Dataset is slower after calling `to_iterable_dataset`

### Describe the bug

Can anyone explain why looping over a dataset becomes slower after calling `to_iterable_dataset` to convert to `IterableDataset`

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Any dataset after converting to `IterableDataset`

### Expected behavior

Maybe it should be faster on big dataset? I only test on small dataset

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.14.4
- Platform: Linux-5.15.0-76-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.15
- Huggingface_hub version: 0.16.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.5.3

Comments:
@lhoestq 

It's roughly the same code between the two so we can expected roughly the same speed, could you share a benchmark ?