Module: Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds

Goal state before:
pp: case hi
𝕜 : Type u_1
inst✝⁶ : NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜
E : Type uE
inst✝⁵ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝⁴ : NormedSpace 𝕜 E
Fu : Type u
inst✝³ : NormedAddCommGroup Fu
inst✝² : NormedSpace 𝕜 Fu
f : E → Fu
s : Set E
t : Set Fu
x : E
ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t
hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s
hst : MapsTo f s t
hx : x ∈ s
C D : ℝ
n : ℕ
IH :
  ∀ m ≤ n,
    ∀ {Gu : Type u} [inst : NormedAddCommGroup Gu] [inst_1 : NormedSpace 𝕜 Gu] {g : Fu → Gu},
      ContDiffOn 𝕜 (↑m) g t →
        ContDiffOn 𝕜 (↑m) f s →
          (∀ i ≤ m, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i g t (f x)‖ ≤ C) →
            (∀ (i : ℕ), 1 ≤ i → i ≤ m → ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ ≤ D ^ i) →
              ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 m (g ∘ f) s x‖ ≤ ↑m ! * C * D ^ m
Gu : Type u
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup Gu
inst✝ : NormedSpace 𝕜 Gu
g : Fu → Gu
hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (↑(n + 1)) g t
hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 (↑(n + 1)) f s
hC : ∀ i ≤ n + 1, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i g t (f x)‖ ≤ C
hD : ∀ (i : ℕ), 1 ≤ i → i ≤ n + 1 → ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ ≤ D ^ i
⊢ ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (g ∘ f) s x‖ ≤ ↑(n + 1)! * C * D ^ (n + 1)

Tactic:
have M : (n : ℕ∞ω) < n.succ := Nat.cast_lt.2 n.lt_succ_self
  have Cnonneg : 0 ≤ C := (norm_nonneg _).trans (hC 0 bot_le)
  have Dnonneg : 0 ≤ D := by
    have : 1 ≤ n + 1 := by simp
    simpa using (norm_nonneg _).trans (hD 1 le_rfl this)
  -- use the inductive assumption to bound the derivatives of `g' ∘ f`.
  have I : ∀ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
      ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t ∘ f) s x‖ ≤ i ! * C * D ^ i := by
    intro i hi
    simp only [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff] at hi
    apply IH i hi
    · apply hg.fderivWithin ht
      grw [Nat.cast_succ, hi]
    · apply hf.of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (hi.trans n.le_succ))
    · intro j hj
      have : ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 j (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t) t (f x)‖ =
          ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (j + 1) g t (f x)‖ := by
        rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_right ht (hst hx), comp_apply,
          LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
      rw [this]
      exact hC (j + 1) (add_le_add (hj.trans hi) le_rfl)
    · intro j hj h'j
      exact hD j hj (h'j.trans (hi.trans n.le_succ))
  -- reformulate `hD` as a bound for the derivatives of `f'`.
  have J : ∀ i, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x‖ ≤ D ^ (n - i + 1) := by
    intro i
    have : ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i + 1) f s x‖ ≤ D ^ (n - i + 1) :=
      hD (n - i + 1) (by simp) (Nat.succ_le_succ tsub_le_self)
    simpa [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_right hs hx]
  -- Now put these together: first, notice that we have to bound `D^n (g' ∘ f ⬝ f')`.
  calc
    ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (g ∘ f) s x‖ =
        ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : E => fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s y) s x‖ := by
      rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_right hs hx, comp_apply,
        LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
    _ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : E => ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 E Fu Gu
        (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f y)) (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y)) s x‖ := by
      congr 1
      refine iteratedFDerivWithin_congr (fun y hy => ?_) hx _
      apply fderivWithin_comp _ _ _ hst (hs y hy)
      · exact hg.differentiableOn (by positivity) _ (hst hy)
      · exact hf.differentiableOn (by positivity) _ hy
    -- bound it using! the fact that the composition of linear maps is a bilinear operation,
    -- for which we have bounds for the`n`-th derivative.
    _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
        (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t ∘ f) s x‖ *
          ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x‖ := by
      exact (ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 E Fu Gu).norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one
        ((hg.fderivWithin ht (by simp)).comp (hf.of_le M.le) hst) (hf.fderivWithin hs (by simp))
        hs hx le_rfl (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compL_le 𝕜 E Fu Gu)
    -- bound each of the terms using the estimates on previous derivatives (that use the inductive
    -- assumption for `g' ∘ f`).
    _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * (i ! * C * D ^ i) * D ^ (n - i + 1) := by
      gcongr with i hi
      · exact I i hi
      · exact J i
    -- We are left with trivial algebraic manipulations to see that this is smaller than
    -- the claimed bound.
    _ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
        (n ! : ℝ) * ((i ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * i !) * C * (D ^ i * D ^ (n - i + 1)) * ((n - i)! : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
      congr! 1 with i hi
      simp only [Nat.cast_choose ℝ (Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.1 hi), div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv]
      ring
    _ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n ! : ℝ) * 1 * C * D ^ (n + 1) * ((n - i)! : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
      congr! with i hi
      · exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (by positivity)
      · rw [← pow_add]
        congr 1
        rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.succ_inj]
        exact Nat.add_sub_of_le (Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.1 hi)
    _ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n ! : ℝ) * 1 * C * D ^ (n + 1) * 1 := by
      gcongr with i
      apply inv_le_one_of_one_le₀
      simpa only [Nat.one_le_cast] using! (n - i).factorial_pos
    _ = (n + 1)! * C * D ^ (n + 1) := by
      simp only [mul_assoc, mul_one, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul,
        Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]

Goal state after: