Module: Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.GromovHausdorff

Goal state before:
pp: case refine_3
δ : ℝ
δpos : δ > 0
ε : ℝ := 2 / 5 * δ
εpos : 0 < ε
s : (p : GHSpace) → Set p.Rep
hs : ∀ (p : GHSpace), (s p).Finite ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s p, ball x ε
N : GHSpace → ℕ := fun p ↦ Nat.card ↑(s p)
E : (p : GHSpace) → ↑(s p) ≃ Fin (Nat.card ↑(s p)) := fun p ↦ Finite.equivFin ↑(s p)
F : GHSpace → (n : ℕ) × (Fin n → Fin n → ℤ) := fun p ↦ ⟨N p, fun a b ↦ ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist ((E p).symm a) ((E p).symm b)⌋⟩
p q : GHSpace
hpq : F p = F q
Npq : N p = N q
Ψ : ↑(s p) → ↑(s q) := fun x ↦ (E q).symm (Fin.cast Npq ((E p) x))
Φ : ↑(s p) → q.Rep := fun x ↦ ↑(Ψ x)
⊢ ∀ (x y : ↑(s p)), |dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)| ≤ ε

Tactic:
show ∀ x y : s p, |dist x y - dist (Φ x) (Φ y)| ≤ ε
      /- the distance between `x` and `y` is encoded in `F p`, and the distance between
      `Φ x` and `Φ y` (two points of `s q`) is encoded in `F q`, all this up to `ε`.
      As `F p = F q`, the distances are almost equal. -/
      intro x y
      -- introduce `i`, that codes both `x` and `Φ x` in `Fin (N p) = Fin (N q)`
      let i : ℕ := E p x
      have hip : i < N p := ((E p) x).2
      have hiq : i < N q := by rwa [Npq] at hip
      have i' : i = (E q) (Ψ x) := by simp only [i, Ψ, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, Fin.val_cast]
      -- introduce `j`, that codes both `y` and `Φ y` in `Fin (N p) = Fin (N q)`
      let j : ℕ := E p y
      have hjp : j < N p := ((E p) y).2
      have hjq : j < N q := by rwa [Npq] at hjp
      have j' : j = ((E q) (Ψ y)).1 := by
        simp only [j, Ψ, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, Fin.val_cast]
      -- Express `dist x y` in terms of `F p`
      have : (F p).2 ((E p) x) ((E p) y) = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋ := by
        simp only [F, (E p).symm_apply_apply]
      have Ap : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist x y⌋ := by rw [← this]
      -- Express `dist (Φ x) (Φ y)` in terms of `F q`
      have : (F q).2 ((E q) (Ψ x)) ((E q) (Ψ y)) = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋ := by
        simp only [F, (E q).symm_apply_apply]
      have Aq : (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩ = ⌊ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)⌋ := by
        simp [← this, *]
      -- use the equality between `F p` and `F q` to deduce that the distances have equal
      -- integer parts
      have : (F p).2 ⟨i, hip⟩ ⟨j, hjp⟩ = (F q).2 ⟨i, hiq⟩ ⟨j, hjq⟩ := by
        have hpq' : (F p).snd ≍ (F q).snd := (Sigma.mk.inj_iff.1 hpq).2
        rw [Fin.heq_fun₂_iff Npq Npq] at hpq'
        rw [← hpq']
      rw [Ap, Aq] at this
      -- deduce that the distances coincide up to `ε`, by a straightforward computation
      -- that should be automated
      have I :=
        calc
          ε⁻¹ * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| = |ε⁻¹ * (dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y))| := by
            rw [abs_mul, abs_of_nonneg (inv_pos.2 εpos).le]
          _ = |ε⁻¹ * dist x y - ε⁻¹ * dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)| := by congr; ring
          _ ≤ 1 := le_of_lt (abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor this)
      calc
        |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)|
        _ = ε * (ε⁻¹ * |dist x y - dist (Ψ x) (Ψ y)|) := by
            #adaptation_note /-- Before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/13166
            (replacing grind's canonicalizer with a type-directed normalizer), `grind` closed
            this goal. It is not yet clear whether this is due to defeq abuse in Mathlib or a
            problem in the new canonicalizer; a minimization would help. The original proof was:
            `grind` -/
            field_simp
        _ ≤ ε * 1 := by gcongr
        _ = ε := mul_one _

Goal state after: