Premise: Can I say, if I could just say a word about a woman that you didn't ask about, but my mom passed away a couple years ago, just before I was deciding to run. And she was in the hospital, and I went in to talk to her and tell her what I was thinking of doing.

Hypothesis: I decided to run after my mother passed away.

There is no specific confirmation that the speaker decided to run.


Premise: In The Toronto Star, the story is that, before the offending letter was sent off to Swiss authorities, it went back and forth several times between Staff Sergeant Fiegenwald and the Justice Department lawyer Kimberly Prost, each time resulting in the Justice Department toughening the language.

Hypothesis: The Toronto Star rarely consults the Swiss authorities.

We do not know how often The Toronto Star works with Swiss authorities.


Premise: For example: to have diplomatic initiatives to diffuse the tensions between ethnic groups and encourage peacekeeping initiatives between these rival groups; to introduce positive information to counter the negative information that is being spread; to have an international arms registry that deals with specific arms, which would go a long way to adding a measure of transparency and accountability where there are military organizations.

Hypothesis: diplomatic initiatives help to diffuse the tensions between ethnic groups

The context states that diplomatic initiatives would add a measure of transparency and accountability but it doesn't state that they are actually successful in diffusing tensions. The system could likely not understand that nowhere does it report on the efficacy of the diplomatic initiatives.


Premise: Well, I'm not for photo licensing. Let me say something about Columbine. Listen, we've got gun laws. He says we ought to have gun-free schools. Everybody believes that. I'm sure every state in the union has got them. You can't carry a gun into a school. And there ought to be a consequence when you do carry a gun into a school.

Hypothesis: allowing guns into schools would increase safety

there is no way to know if allowing more guns in schools would make them more safe


Premise: And I think to answer your question, I think both of us care a lot about the environment. We may have different approaches. We may have different approaches in terms of how we deal with local folks. I just cited an example of the administration just unilaterally acting without any input.

Hypothesis: I will answer your question

It is not stated clearly in the phhrase.


Premise: So we've got to enforce our civil rights laws. We've got to deal with things like racial profiling. And we have to keep our military strong. We have the strongest military, and I'll do whatever is necessary, if I'm president, to make sure that it stays that way.

Hypothesis: Enforcing civil rights laws will help us have the strongest military.

It doesn't say that & there's no way to know that by the context.


Premise: Now, there's more work to do. Remains to be seen, however, whether or not there's going to be a political settlement in Kosovo, and I certainly hope there is one. Also on record as saying at some point in time I hope our European friends become the peacekeepers in Bosnia and in the Balkans.

Hypothesis: There will be a political settlement in Kosovo with in the next two weeks.

The statement doesnt say when there will be a political settlement.  Dont know what the system thinks its incorrect.


Premise: I would agree. And I also agree that most police officers, of course, are doing a good job and hate this practice also. I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts not long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

It's impossible to know based on the statement if Springfield, Massachusetts has mainly white cops in its police force.


Premise: You will note, honourable senators, that I am not following the Reform line of putting a lowered debt as a priority, because the economic growth that is so necessary for more jobs is better assured by a drop in taxes and charges against total payrolls, and because the debt-to-GDP ratio will probably drop to 63 per cent within three years.

Hypothesis: Driving  airstreams, riding motorcyles, drinking whiskey in the next three will payback debt

All the following airstreamers, Harley Davidson, and Jack Daniel are all american made products. There the more consumers buy these product the lower the debt-to-GDP will drop.


Premise: A Member is doing something inherently connected with a ``proceeding in Parliament'' when putting down a question on the Order Paper, a notice of motion, a notice of motion for the production of papers, or a report stage amendment; when obtaining assistance to do any of these; or when obtaining assistance to draft a bill.

Hypothesis: The Order Paper is not actually written in paper

It's unknown if the Order Paper is stored electronically or on paper


Premise: Members of the federal government team most active in implementing Gathering Strength include the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Canadian Heritage, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Health Canada, Human Resources and Development Canada, Industry Canada, Department of Justice, Natural Resources Canada, Solicitor General and Statistics Canada.

Hypothesis: The Department of Indian Affairs has no Cherokee.

It doesn't tell if there are any Cherokee Indians on the DIA. The statement could be true or not.


Premise: Honourable senators, pursuant to rule 23(6), and on behalf of Senator Hays, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-Japan Interparliamentary Group to the seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum which took place in Lima, Peru from January 11 to 14, 1999.

Hypothesis: The seventh annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Forum did not not occur while it was raining.

The context has nothing to do with it raining, therefore it is neither.


Premise: It is quite unfortunate that some members of this House feel they have a hierarchy that is higher than the ordinary Canadian, better than most members of Parliament, that they are in a preferred category of having the ideologies that speak better to all Canadians than other members.

Hypothesis: Canadians are put in ice floes to die when they retire.

We do not know from the context whether or not Canadians are put in ice floes to die when they retire, so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Premise: These debates are sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. The format and the rules are those negotiated by representatives of the two campaigns. Only the subjects tonight and the questions are mine. The format tonight is that of a conversation.

Hypothesis: The debates are between candidates of the same party.

The text doesn't say what party the "two campaigns" represent. The model assumed they were from different parties.


Premise: Well, the issue before this Court, I hasten to say, as I said before, is only whether, once the Congress makes that judgment, it can ever change it retrospectively. The issue before this Court is not whether, in the future, a certain length of time would be appropriate.

Hypothesis: Congress will change the decision of a judgement without considering when the decision was made.

The statement is referring to the question if Congress can change their judgement after it is made, the time frame and if allowed is not clear.


Premise: A headline in the local paper stated that the Health Canada scientists, who you had mentioned earlier in your speech had taken affidavits in order to be able to talk, had been gagged by the department over their protest and will likely be under gag order for the rest of their careers, despite a Senate promise to keep an eye on Health Canada's management problems.

Hypothesis: Health Canada has fixed their management problems.

It is clear from the text that Health Canada had prior management problems, but it is not clear if those problems have been fixed or not.  I am not sure why the system did not understand this.


Premise: Justice Breyer, under our theory as we've advanced it, you're right; the 1976 act would be unconstitutional. Whether this Court would apply such a holding in this case to that act is a question that would have to be resolved under the retrospective --

Hypothesis: This hearing was in the 90s


Premise: When they try to hurt us, they are hurting themselves, because now we can talk about committees, such as the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, the Standing Committee on Finance, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, and the Standing Committee on Health.

Hypothesis: The people who believe in human rights don't work for the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights

Eventhough they don't believe in human rights, they could still work in the committee, you don't have to believe in something to work for it.


Premise: Let me just tell you who the jury is. The people of Texas. There's only been one governor ever elected to back-to-back four-year terms, and that was me. And I was able to do so with a lot of Democrat votes, nearly 50% of the Hispanic vote, about 27% of the African-American vote, because people know I'm a conservative person and a compassionate person.

Hypothesis: The person elected for back to back four year terms was George W. Bush.

The speaker of the passage was never revealed. It could be this person, or it could not be this person. The system probably wanted to make a binary classification where there wasn't one.


Premise: In response to the third point made by the Honourable Senator Roche, which is about Canada's role in the entire area, the Minister of Foreign Affairs has said there is a three-fold response: securing agreement to an updated five-year action program with new, concrete objectives for disarmament and non-proliferation; seeking a more robust review and assessment process to give full meaning to the principle of permanence with accountability; and promoting universal adherence to the NPT, with renewed commitment by treaty member states to live up to their obligations.

Hypothesis: The US government has no comment on the matter.

Based on the context the statement "The US government has no comment on the matter" could be correct, or not correct..I'm not exactly sure why it was difficult for the system..


Premise: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.

Hypothesis: General Olson has three middle names.

We do not know how many middle names General Olson has, if any, so the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Premise: Tonight the topic will be domestic affairs, but the format will be the same as that first debate. I'll moderate our discussion under detailed rules agreed to by the candidates, but the questions and the areas to be covered were chosen by me. I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are.

Hypothesis: the candidates or anyone else  know what they are in the office.

I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are. By adding the word to the office we don't know if they know or not what they are in the office, so the statement could be neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect


Premise: This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could, of course, eviscerate that term of any meaning, but under the principle of enumeration as this Court has articulated it, this Court should interpret that clause in a way that gives its terms effect in a simple way.

Hypothesis: limited times was interpreted by amy


Premise: Judge, if I may, there are some things here that we can agree with, but there are others that we can't. And this is why, in our opinion, Judge. You know, if our clients are believed, the reporters did talk to them but took misrepresentative statements so that they left things out to put them in a false light and in so doing have created articles that, if they were admitted for the truth of the matter asserted, would be misrepresentative.

Hypothesis: Judge has made a sentence kenny


Premise: The wrong impression that many have is that somehow through some sanctions a person will be brought into court if their child has been accused or is being charged with an offence before the courts and that somehow the courts will actually be able to hold the parent or guardian accountable.

Hypothesis: Children can be given the death penalty.

It is unclear if children can be given the death penalty. The system was confused by the context.


Premise: The Liberal member who just spoke is not going to support this bill and it really puzzles me why a member of the government, not just a member of the House, would stand up in this place, look the Canadian public in the eye by way of the television camera and say ``I will not support your having access to information about how we spend your tax dollars''.

Hypothesis: Most liberal members support the bill.

This must be neither correct or incorrect as we do not know the political affiliation of the person providing the context nor do we know whether the other members of the liberal party are for or against the measure.


Premise: In this regard, the Bloc Quebecois would have preferred that the Export Development Corporation draw more on the very simple and probably more effective operational framework of the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, since they require, for each sensitive project in a sensitive area, an impact study, public hearings and most importantly process transparency.

Hypothesis: Bloc Quebecois will no longer express his preferences when the World Bank is involved.

We have no clue whether Bloc will or will not express his preferences when the World Bank is involved. Not sure how this fooled the AI system.


Premise: In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Hypothesis: The case doesn't matter at teh end of the day.

It matters because it makes a changes to several acts.


Premise: Justice Breyer, it's conceivable that the Court might do that if that situation was present, but it's not remotely the situation here. We have the adoption of copyright terms which are consistent, generally speaking, with copyright terms which exist in the European Union, our principal competitor, and in connection with international treaties.

Hypothesis: Copyright terms are the same all over the world.

The wording that I chose and the fact that the text refers to the European Union made it difficult for the system.


Premise: The best way to take the pressure off our troops is to succeed in Iraq, is to train Iraqis so they can do the hard work of democracy, is to give them a chance to defend their country, which is precisely what we're doing. We'll have 125,000 troops trained by the end of this year.

Hypothesis: Success in Iraq will certainly ease the pressure on the troops.

The context is an assumption and the system nor the speaker can assume it to be totally right or wrong.


Premise: At this milestone in our history, I encourage honourable senators to reflect on the events of December 6, 1989, and to do what you can to ensure that we have -and to the extent that we have not, that we strive to have - a society where there is respect and harmony between men and women.

Hypothesis: Senators have put a lot of effort to ensure respect and harmony between men and women before December 6, 1989.

We don't know about the efforts of senators about the respect and harmony between men and women before that date.


Premise: When your counsel asks you the question, you may review the article, take a look at it, see if it refreshes your recollection. It's important that having refreshed your recollection, if it jogs something or re-creates a memory, that you testify in answer to Mr. Harvey's question. Do not look back and read from the article as you're testifying, please. All right?

Hypothesis: The person on the stand is lying.

No information is given regarding the honesty of the person on the stand.


Premise: Honourable senators, I am somewhat hesitant, even humbled, to introduce my rather technical subject after listening to the learned debate this afternoon on Bill C-20. The quality of the debate has been unusually high and fascinating, given the nature of the subject matter - the very survival of our great nation.

Hypothesis: The senators don't want to hear what this speaker has to say.

There is no mention about this which make it neither correct nor incorrect.


Premise: The best people to watch over the quality of our health care system are not the hon. members of the Liberal Party, but the citizens who, along with the various provinces, will put pressure on the government and their local representatives who are involved in the health care system.

Hypothesis: the conservatives are great people


Premise: This week, the Bloc Quebecois presented a motion asking the government for the opportunity to exercise a very democratic right in the House of Commons: the members' right to vote and give the government the mandate to takes its responsibilities in terms of honouring commitments made to NATO.

Hypothesis: Bloc Quebecois members enjoy brunch

There is no way to know if Bloc Quebecois members do or do not enjoy brunch or how many do or do not.


Premise: I recall my husband speaking. In fact, he hadn't prepared to speak, but he was very upset, as many people in the audience were, and he stood up to speak. I don't remember his exact comments, but, again, it was a warning to the school board and -actually, not necessarily a warning, but just sort of reiterating what science teachers do in their science classes and how there is really no conflict here with the textbook.

Hypothesis: This was a school board meeting

It is not clear if this was an actual meeting.


Premise: What a slap in the face to many of the parents and taxpayers of the Dover area. How sad that a member of our own school board would be so closed-minded and not want to carry on the mission of Dover schools. "His ignorance will not only hold back children attending Dover area schools, but also reinforce other communities' views that Dover is a backwards, close-minded community.

Hypothesis: Dover is located in Colorado.

Nothing in the text mentions where Dover is located so we don't know without using external resources. It's difficult because perhaps the system does know that Dover is not actually in Colorado so it judges the answer to be incorrect even though the text does not explicitly state it to be incorrect.


Premise: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our security, the security of our industries and the high tech development occurring, to protect those secrets from encroachment and incursion by forces outside of our country that have almost an open door to move across our borders into our country and set up their espionage organizations to take these secrets from our very high tech society in this country and use them against us.

Hypothesis: The government is prepared to reinforce budgets

This statement fits into the neither category, because we know nothing about the actual preparedness of the government from this context. The system may have interpreted the first sentence as the governement not being prepared.


Premise: No. We've got one in Texas. And guess what? The three men who murdered James Byrd, guess what's going to happen to them? They're going to be put to death. A jury found them guilty. It's going to be hard to punish them any worse after they get put to death.

Hypothesis: Byrd served jail time.

It is unclear if Byrd served jail time. The system was confused by the context.


Premise: First let me just say one comment about what the vice president said. I think one of the lessons in between World War I and World War II is we let our military atrophy. And we can't do that. We've got to rebuild our military. But one of the problems we have in the military is we're in a lot of places around the world.

Hypothesis: The military is ready for World War III.

It is unclear if the military is ready for another world war. The system was confused by the context.


Premise: The federal government is talking about looking after home care, community services, strategies for youth, bursaries, pharmacare, ways to interest young people in science, a national school nutrition program, Canada wide benefits for poor children, a Canadian foundation for innovation, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Hypothesis: The government wants to tax people more money

The context states that the government is talking about doing more for the community but does not talk about how they are going to do it. It is not certain that the government will tax people for more money.


Premise: You work that out. Let's get back on the record here, because we've got people waiting and I want to get going. You'll have to work that out. But I will tell you in concluding that if it is at night, if you do it at night, I will give you my home number, and you can contact me so we get this finished. If we have to do that, we'll do it so we get it finished. I will not attend the deposition, though. I stopped doing that when I got this job. Anything else?

Hypothesis: The person's job prevents them from attending the deposition.

The text says " I will not attend the deposition, though. I stopped doing that when I got this job." - It isn't clear whether the job prevents it or it's a choice. The model assumed it.


Premise: Therefore I am very pleased to indicate to the member that within the next couple of weeks we will make available a service charge calculator free of charge on our website, Strategis, that will enable consumers to compare the charges levied against them by a variety of financial institutions and see in a very transparent and rapid way where the best services charges can be obtained.

Hypothesis: The service charge calculator will be available before next month.

It is correct or incorrect because the calculator will be available in a few weeks, which could be months from now.


Premise: That the subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act be granted authority to travel to Edmonton, Regina and Winnipeg during the week of April 19, 1999, to Kingston and Toronto during the week of May 10, 1999 and to Montreal and region during the week of May 24, 1999 and that the necessary staff accompany it.

Hypothesis: The subcommittee on Corrections and Conditional Release Act members are all alive to this day.

We can't know if the members are alive or deceased. 1999 isn't that long ago so it's possible they are all still alive but equally as possible that some are deceased.


Premise: Local control or local input into resource management can be a good thing but it should not be based on anything other than the fact that there are people who are local to the area and who have a vested interest in the decisions that may affect them and may affect the land they are living on.

Hypothesis: Local control is a good thing


Premise: The -- as we described in our brief, in pages 34 through 36, I believe it is in our brief, that the concerns about the limitation on exploitation and the limitation of a copyright period in Europe is based upon the country of origin of the work and the shortest time available.

Hypothesis: The concerns are not in the brief.

The text says they believe it is in the brief, it does not state definitively.


Premise: But for them, they get the benefit of the longer term if you don't apply it to an existing copyright. I mean, if you say you need 70 years because of changes in the economy to encourage works, you grant 70 for the future, but why does that, making that apply to somebody provided him?

Hypothesis: The amount of years mentioned in the text is higher than 75.

It's definitely incorrect because 70 years is mentioned, and 70 years is not higher than 75 years. I'm not really sure why this was difficult.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, just to show how absurd the icebreaking policy is, the ships providing ferry service between Quebec City and Lvis, Baie-Comeau and Matane, and Rivire-du-Loup and Saint-Simon will have to pay icebreaking fees this winter, while federal government vessels and Newfoundland ferries will not.

Hypothesis: Saint-Simon is the speaker of the house.

Saint-Simon is a city or town that is getting ferry service, not a person.


Premise: Based upon this possibility and given that the government has wasted almost $1 billion on cancellation fees and will spend much more on lawsuits, will the government attempt to save the Canadian taxpayer a large sum of money by purchasing the same helicopter for both search and rescue and maritime operations - in other words, return to commonality?

Hypothesis: The government has wasted more than $1.01 billion on cancellation fees.

It says they wasted almost $1 billion, which presumably means less than $1 billion, not more than $1.01 billion. It's difficult because the system might not know what "almost" means in this context.


Premise: Yes. I grew up in Dover, I attended Dover High School, graduated from Dover High School. My family, my extended family, lives in the Dover area, including my grandparents, my parents, and other relatives. My parents currently still live in the Dover area.

Hypothesis: My grandparents are currently growing up in the Dover area.

The grandparents are already grown adults and were not still growing up in the Dover area.


Premise: No child should be left behind in America. I want to make sure we rebuild our military to keep the peace. I worry about morale in today's military. The warning signs are clear. It is time to have a new commander in chief who will rebuild the military, pay our men and women more, make sure they're housed better and have a focused mission for our military.

Hypothesis: Bad kids should be left behind in America.

If no child should be left behind in America, then that also applies to bad kids, so the statement is definitely incorrect.


Premise: Well, because there wasn't really a clear resolution to what had occurred the previous meeting. In addition, I was very angry when I left the June 7th meeting just because of the demeanor of the school board and the things that were being said. And, honestly, I thought that maybe it would set me into labor because of, you know, being angry, and at that point in time I was past my due date, in addition to caring about my children's education and everything I said previously.

Hypothesis: The speaker here is a man.

This is false because they are pregnant, so they must be female.


Premise: To my students taking a PSSA test, well, you know, I -- being an educator, I'm not in love with PSSA tests or standardized tests. But if you're asking me if I object to my daughter taking a standardized test with that information on it, of course not. I would hope that they would provide lots of academic information on those tests.

Hypothesis: The writer is a parent but not a teacher.

The writer is both a teacher/educator with students AND a parent with a daughter. The model may have been fooled by the BUT statement.


Premise: One of the criteria that I think is important in deciding when and if we should ever get involved around the world is whether or not our national security interest is involved, if we can really make the difference with military forces. We tried everything else.

Hypothesis: National security is the lowest priority

The person who wrote it says that it is one of the most important factors. The system got it wrong because it might be a matter of opinion


Premise: Okay, and is your argument that we find and hold against their retrospective because there is some, at least plausible basis should so argument, to say that there can be a causal connection between the retrospective extension and some benefit that can be traced to those particular works through the retrospective extension, like dissemination? Is that your argument?

Hypothesis: The argument is clear to the person

The argument is not clear to the person because the are asking a number of questions. If it was clear they wouldn't need to clarify. The system could likely not understand that asking questions equates to not understanding something. Although to note, this particular example was very difficult to understand and read as gibberish.


Premise: No. What we were saying is, if Congress wants to permit restoration of films, for example, an issue that's been well briefed here, Congress can say, if you restore the film, then the restoration gets a copyright so long as it satisfies originality as outlined in Feist, and it gets a copyright for a period of time. But this Court's opinion in Graham and in Feist made clear that it could not extend copyrights to works in the public domain. The Government doesn't concede that, but we stand on that as a way of understanding why this Court --

Hypothesis: The discussion is about sponsorship


Premise: Mr. Speaker, so the member for Vaudreuil-Soulanges is very concerned that his own party could raise by 20% the number of Air Canada shares owned by a single shareholder, since, according to him, the Caisse de dpt et placement du Qubec could increase its holding of shares of this company to the point of taking control of it.

Hypothesis: Air Canada is owned by a single shareholder.

The system may have seen the phrase in a sentence and ignored the rest of the context.


Premise: Justice, we do not believe that the very first act extended terms at all. Speaking technically, which for a lawyer means speaking accurately, the 1790 act did not extend a Federal term. The 1790 act granted a term for works that already existed in precisely the pattern that the English parliament had done in the Statute of Anne in 1710, and that the English parliament did with monopolies, general monopolies in the statute.

Hypothesis: The English parliament mentions the game monopoly

It mentions monopoly, not the game monopoly


Premise: I'm not sure what kind of view he's describing to me. I can just tell you, I'm a person who respects other people. I respect their -- I respect -- on the one hand he says he agrees with me and then he says he doesn't. I'm not sure where he's coming from. But I will be a tolerant person. I've been a tolerant person all my life. I just happen to believe strongly that marriage is between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: The topic is evolution in this conversation

the topic appears to be about the sanctity of marriage


Premise: He came to care about the Senate, but he has deep concerns about its viability in its present form, concerns which he expressed in a very fine speech in February of 1998. He challenged all of us to work together constructively for change, both constitutional change and internal change.

Hypothesis: The speech occurred in the early 90s'

Incorrect, it occurred in 1998 which is late 90's


Premise: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.

Hypothesis: The petitioners argue that a time limit that can be continuously extended is limited.

The petitioners are arguing the opposite. I think the system got it wrong because the context is confusingly and circularly worded.


Premise: The petitioners are drawing attention to the fact that our region has been heavily affected by the groundfish moratorium imposed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada back in May 1994. Since then, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population.

Hypothesis: Survival of the tinny population

From 1994 Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS means of survival for a large part of our population.


Premise: It is probably-and I ask myself the same question as the hon. member for Trois-Rivires does-to pass the time, because the government has no political will to truly lead the country, to advocate new directions for the economy, and to ensure that the injustices created by the cuts it imposed on the provinces are corrected.

Hypothesis: The speaker is in favor of the government actions

The speaker has obvious disdain for what the government is doing


Premise: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-67 with no resistance at this time because we believe that the bill is offering advantages to Canadians, we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur.

Hypothesis: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill B-67 we should  scold the government for not implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur


Premise: We are as deeply concerned as most Canadians about the enormous, largely unchecked power of the Prime Minister through governor in council appointments to name political friends of the government to sensitive positions throughout the entire public service, agencies, crown corporations and the like.

Hypothesis: Not name political friends of the government to sensitive positions throughout the entire public service, agencies, crown corporations and the like.

Prime Minister through governor in council appointments to name political friends of the government to sensitive positions. The system was confused by the wording.


Premise: I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do. I just don't think it's the role of the United States to walk into a country and say, we do it this way, so should you. I think we can help. I know we've got to encourage democracy in the marketplaces.

Hypothesis: The speaker is not a fan of people or countries acting independently.

The writer says "I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do." -so he is in favor of being independent. I guess helping people sends a mixed message.


Premise: We have Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser representing B.C., Paul Brewer, Leslie Hamill, Judith Scott representing NCR, Kevin King, Steve Covell representing the prairies, Mike Benoit, John Irving representing Ontario, Abdelkader Elkak, known as ElKak, Denis Dupre representing Quebec, Byrun Shandler representing the north, Nycole Turmel as an officer, and the negotiator is Luc David.

Hypothesis: Gary Smith, Rene Kitson, John Shaw, Gary Fraser and Paul Brewer represent B.C.

Incorrect because Paul Brewer represents Ontario


Premise: Judge, if I may, there are some things here that we can agree with, but there are others that we can't. And this is why, in our opinion, Judge. You know, if our clients are believed, the reporters did talk to them but took misrepresentative statements so that they left things out to put them in a false light and in so doing have created articles that, if they were admitted for the truth of the matter asserted, would be misrepresentative.

Hypothesis: The word judge is used three time in this article.

The word "judge" is only used twice in the article. I'm not sure how the system missed this one.


Premise: When we were making the case for Triumph, the $167.5 million grant to the University of British Columbia base research in folic physics and particle physics, one had to explain what this was about, but the most telling argument was the spin-off in high talent, high intelligence based industries in British Columbia.

Hypothesis: University of British Columbia received a grant to research theoretical physics.

It specifically states what the grant was for and theoretical wasn't on there.


Premise: In other words you could have -- right now, if Congress decides to have a law, and this law is going to give copyrights in 1) the Bible, 2) Shakespeare, 3) Ben Jonson, and the reason they do it is that they think that that would lead publishers to produce those and distribute them, and they're right, they will, okay? In your view, that's perfectly constitutional?

Hypothesis: The bible is copyrighted


Premise: In September, 1998, an invitation was sent by that committee to Dr. Chopra and others to appear before the committee, and a notice of meeting was issued for October 1, 1998. That meeting, however, was cancelled as the scientists stated that they were concerned about the repercussions on their careers if they appeared before our committee.

Hypothesis: The topic of the meeting is clear.

It is incorrect that the topic is clear, it is not stated in the paragraph.


Premise: I ask the Prime Minister, who is perhaps better informed, where the terrible threat would be to Canada, to the Canadian federation, in having Quebec representation in the asbestos dispute in the WTO, even if this is, in the eyes of the Quebec Liberal MPs, asking too much, since they are so used to making no demands?

Hypothesis: the prime minister doesn't know enough about this issue

per the statement, he says he is more informed


Premise: But I feel very strongly about that. And if I'm elected president, I will do something about that. But I think that we -- I think we have to start with better parenting. But I don't think that we can ignore the role played by guns. I mean, the fact is that there -- even though no state wants them, there are guns in some schools.

Hypothesis: president has a q


Premise: I want to make myself clear, we consider the role played by the Export Development Corporation both positive and vital, but we feel it must conduct itself as a crown corporation of a country that cannot blindly encourage and support exports and investments abroad without considering the effects of its action.

Hypothesis: The Export Development Corporation negatively exports investments


Premise: If I were a married person and had a child, I would want that child to have the faith that I believe, the faith that I cherish, the faith that I believe has made me a better person, a better citizen of Canada, a better member of my community and which, hopefully, some day would make me a star citizen in the eternity of heaven.

Hypothesis: the speaker is a mother

the speaker is clearly hypothesizing from the standpoint of a parent, which they are not


Premise: However, no testimony shall relate to unpublished material or information or to the reporters' motivations, bias, mental impressions, or other information extrinsic to what the reporter saw and heard, and the reporter shall not be obligated to reveal any confidential sources.

Hypothesis: The omission of the identity of confidential sources is not allowed in a reporters' testimony.

The written statement is worded in a way that suggests that a reporter is required to reveal their confidential sources, and this is not the case. The system was fooled by this due to the indirect wording of the statement.


Premise: And we have got to again lead by example and help these other countries that are trying to straighten out their situations find the tools in order to do it. I just think, Jim, that this is an absolutely unique period in world history. The world has come together, as I said, they're looking to us.

Hypothesis: The narrator is reluctant to help other countries

No, The narrator wants to lead by example and help other countries


Premise: The wrong impression that many have is that somehow through some sanctions a person will be brought into court if their child has been accused or is being charged with an offence before the courts and that somehow the courts will actually be able to hold the parent or guardian accountable.

Hypothesis: Parents are responsisble for their children's behavior in the home as well as the eyes of the law

Parents cannot be charged from a crime their kid commited. The context will trip up the system


Premise: Even the overall target referred to in the November 12 statement was put in doubt just eight days later-this is how permanent these commitments are-when the Prime Minister implied to Premiers Tobin and Klein that in his misguided desire to look better than the Americans on this issue, perhaps a new target should be adopted by lowering GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007.

Hypothesis: GHG emissions are lower than they were in 1990.

If the target is to lower GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2007, then to say that "GHG emissions are lower than they were in 1990" is definitely incorrect.


Premise: If we were to take the costs of colour cable TV, free condoms, free bleach for needles, the right to sue and legal costs involved, the right to vote and the administrative and logistical costs involved, gun registration and the cost of patronage appointees the Liberals have put on the parole board, just those costs alone, would we not be able to spend more money on hiring more officers or more judges without the increased raises to get rid of the backlog in the courts?

Hypothesis: This excerpt is written in an unbiased, neutral tone.

I don't know what taking away basic commodities for struggling members of society has to do with spending on the legal system, but if I had to guess, I think the parallel is made to rally sensationalists who are quick to jump to conclusions in an effort to defame the Liberals, which is definitely not unbiased nor neutral - therefore, my statement is definitely incorrect. I think the system had difficulty because it does not understand how politicians in the human world will toy with the emotions of the general population in an attempt to gain political leverage.


Premise: The American middle-class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

Hypothesis: Bob is the President.


Premise: It used to be a weekly occurrence. It's now a daily occurrence, and my daughter comes home from school upset about these comments that are being made to her and, you know, is looking for guidance on how to respond to these questions. Also, intelligent design is not a scientific concept.

Hypothesis: daughter contains a qq


Premise: It is the work of the official opposition research and communications people, with the supervision and involvement of the hon. member for Medicine Hat, the hon. member for Calgary Southeast, the hon. member for Prince George-Bulkley Valley and the hon. member for Battlefords-Lloydminster.

Hypothesis: The word "member" is used in the text only once.

It was used 4 times, not only once. It's difficult because the system might not know which word I'm asking it to count.


Premise: The Canadian opportunities strategy includes Canadian millennium scholarships averaging $3,000 a year up to $15,000 in total for four years; Canada study grants averaging $2,225 per year to help students with the greatest need; support for advanced research as detailed earlier; and tax relief for interest on student loans in the Canada student loan interest relief.

Hypothesis: The Canadian opportunities strategy includes centennial scholarships up to $15,000 total per year in addition to tax relief for interest on student loans

It is definitely incorrect, because the scholarship offers $3,000 per year, totaling $15,000 over four years ie not $15,000 per year


Premise: In support of international efforts, we are prepared to take the following steps today: to put a halt to any export credit through the Export Development Corporation; to put on hold any negotiations with the Yugoslav airlines for landing rights; to put on hold any discussions on bilateral efforts; and to consider what kind of support we might provide on a humanitarian basis.

Hypothesis: To support international efforts, we are ready to put on hold considering humanitarian support we can provide.

Actually, we are ready to consider what kind of support we might provide on a humanitarian basis -- not to put this on hold; that phrase applies to the other clauses and fooled the model.


Premise: Finally, the last thing that I want to do -I'm answering soliloquy with soliloquy here. I'm not sure if this is a dialogue. Finally, I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has abundant media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to. That's why we're meeting in chambers.

Hypothesis: The writer is answering a dramatic monologue with a dialoge.

The speaker answers a monologue with a monologue, not a dialogue. The system has a hard time conceptualizing words beyond the fact that they have literal meanings.


Premise: I'm not for gay marriage. I think marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman. And I appreciated the way the administration signed the Defense of Marriage Act. I presume the Vice President supported it when the President signed that bill and supports it now.

Hypothesis: This person believes that gay marriage is a scared institution

This person does NOT believe in gay marriage.


Premise: That this House urge the government to conclude an agreement with the provinces and territories, prior to December 31, 1998, and based on the unanimous resolution of the provinces as agreed to last August 7 at Saskatoon, to strengthen the partnership between the federal, provincial and territorial governments in order to secure Canada's social programs for the future.

Hypothesis: The resolution of the provinces was agreed to on August 7, 1998.

The house is urging the government to conclude an agreement prior to December 1998, this would imply that last August refers to 1997 or prior.


Premise: It is simply evaluating what the term should be prospectively in a way that we presume this Court should presume is legitimate under the First Amendment. When it legislates retrospectively, it is, in effect, looking at particular authors and estates of authors who are before Congress asking for this extension, and it's choosing between these particular authors and the public at large.

Hypothesis: We must make a choice between these particular authors and Congress

The choice is between the particular authors and the public at large


Premise: Mr. Speaker, an internal audit done in 1997 by Consulting and Audit Canada has confirmed what the Bloc Quebecois' analysis clearly showed- political pressure was brought to bear on the administrative staff of Human Resources Development Canada in order to speed up the grant approval process.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a woman

The speaker is addressed as "Mr.Speaker" therefore he is a man.


Premise: I believe that if intelligent design could be proved to be scientific, then I would believe it would belong in a science classroom. Would I believe it? I don't know that scientifically I'm qualified to say, you know, that I believe many scientific concepts because I'm -- I'm not a scientist. But I suppose that if intelligent design could follow scientific methods, then -- and it were proven to be scientific by scientists, it was accepted by scientific communities, then I would have no reason not to accept that.

Hypothesis: This person might be a scientist.

The person states that he is not a scientist. The system was confused by the context.


Premise: Again, there were many, many things that happened at that school board meeting, and I can tell you that I was very much interested in what was being said. And so I pretty well made sure, at the beginning of that meeting, which went on for quite a long time, that I wouldn't miss anything, so I took care of my bathroom needs beforehand.

Hypothesis: Person went to relieve them self because emergency

The person relieved himself so they wouldn't miss anything. Not because it was an emergency.


Premise: It goes without saying that while we are building the infrastructure and building the reputation as one of the premier sporting capitals, not only nationally but internationally, part of the reason we are doing so is that we have high performance young athletes like Eric Daggett.

Hypothesis: National attention is not our only goal when making sporting capitals.

It said that it was also looking for it to be recognized internationally so it is true that national attention is not the only goal.


Premise: What Canadians have told us is that regardless of the fact that government is really responsible constitutionally for education, parents, grandparents and young people themselves want all governments to work together toward education and ensuring that every person who wants to get an education is not deprived of getting that education through colleges or universities or other institutions by virtue of the fact that they do not have any money.

Hypothesis: The Canadian government is responsible for education.

In the first sentence it says right there that the "government is really responsible constitutionally for education" So it has to be correct because it's right there in the passage.


Premise: I think it's an issue that we need to take very seriously. But I don't think we know the solution to global warming yet. And I don't think we've got all the facts before we make decisions. I tell you one thing I'm not going to do is I'm not going to let the United States carry the burden for cleaning up the world's air. Like Kyoto Treaty would have done. China and India were exempted from that treaty. I think we need to be more even-handed, as evidently 99 senators -- I think it was 99 senators supported that position.

Hypothesis: There is no definitive solution to global warming.

It says that the solution is not yet known, so the statement that there is no definitive solution to global warming is correct.


Premise: Now, maybe that explains why he hasn't fully funded the VA and the VA hospital is having trouble and veterans are complaining. Maybe that explains why Medicare patients are complaining about being pushed off of Medicare. He doesn't adequately fund it.

Hypothesis: The VA needs more money.


Premise: We expect an order that is consistent with our understanding of an agreement that we reached -- I will let it to you to address that. And my intention would not be to address this again in open court this afternoon. We would just move on. You have other witnesses, I assume, to present, and we can move through this. I'm simply saying I don't want wiggle room that we're waiting to see, because I've had that experience now before.

Hypothesis: There will be open court this afternoon.

He was says that "My intention would not be to address this again in open court this afternoon".


Premise: If the verifier determines that a proposed land code and a proposed community approval process of a first nation are in accordance with the Framework Agreement and this Act, the council of the first nation may submit the proposed land code and the individual agreement to the first nation members for their approval.

Hypothesis: In order for the council of the first nation to be able to submit the land code to first nation members for approval, a verifier must begin by verifying that the proposed code does not violate the framework agreement

I basically just reversed the statements in the text so they are still correct but the system got confused by them


Premise: Well, I don't believe in command and control out of Washington, D.C. I believe Washington ought to set standards, but again I think we ought to be collaborative at the local levels and I think we ought to work with people at the local levels. And by the way, I just want to make sure -- I can't let him just say something and not correct it.

Hypothesis: He wants to build up small community organizations

The speaker says that he wants to work with people at the local level. A small community organization is at the local level making this statement correct. The model was fooled by the vague subject matter.


Premise: There is no question that John Stewart has brought a powerful personal commitment to defining a realistic approach to our unending preoccupation with war and peace in the modern context, which, as he said in one of his early speeches in this house, sometimes tends to tire us out and foster a lack of will to persist in advancing that cause.

Hypothesis: John Stewart is a modern person

It says that John Stewart commented about modern war so he must exist as a modern person


Premise: Even though Congress's pattern has been to treat all authors equally? I mean, the reason that it's been prospective and retrospective is that people should be, people who hold copyrights should be subject to the same regime and not have some people who got their copyrights the week before the law passed treated differently than people who got it the week after.

Hypothesis: This is an opinion.

Reason:  Speaker is coming from the first person, and it seems to be an opinion.  Why:  There is no concrete wording that says so.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, as we celebrate the 50th anniversaries of both the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the founding of the State of Israel I would like to thank the government House leader and the House leaders of all parties for taking a principled stand on the issue of the holocaust denial.

Hypothesis: The governments did not support conspiracy theories

My statement is a another way to phrase the agent. Holocaust denial is a  conspiracy theory making my statement correct. The model was probably ounce again fooled by my choice of words.


Premise: Your Committee recommends that its quorum be fixed at seven (7) members, provided that both Houses are represented whenever a vote, resolution or other decision is taken, and that the Joint Chairmen be authorized to hold meetings to receive evidence and authorize the printing thereof so long as four (4) members are present, provided that both Houses are represented; and, that the Committee have the power to engage the services of such expert staff, and such stenographic and clerical staff as may be required.

Hypothesis: they won't vote if only a single house is present.

They said both houses need to be represented if there is no be a vote, so my statement that they won't vote with only one house present is true according to the passage.


Premise: We have a copyright term that's consistent with the concept of the creator plus the creator's first generation heirs. We have a copyright term, remember, which supersedes the earlier copyright provisions that were added to the period between creation and publication, so that the limited number of years in the first, the 1790 and the 1831 statute were the number of years plus the relatively unlimited period of time between creation and publication, so we don't have anything remotely like that in this situation.

Hypothesis: legal matters is the topic of this

This is about copyright terms which are legal matters making my statement correct. The model probably got confused by my vague terminology.


Premise: I ask the Prime Minister, who is perhaps better informed, where the terrible threat would be to Canada, to the Canadian federation, in having Quebec representation in the asbestos dispute in the WTO, even if this is, in the eyes of the Quebec Liberal MPs, asking too much, since they are so used to making no demands?

Hypothesis: Asbestos is a hot topic according to this text.

The dispute in the text is concerning asbestos so it stands to reason that it is a topic of interest.


Premise: I interpret the order and the amended order to mean that Your Honor, in a sense, has addressed them as fact witnesses. I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fact witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication. And you initially had indicated that you did not feel that the reporter's privilege stood in this kind of a case.

Hypothesis: The judges (who was addressed in the text as your honor) order implicates that they were addressed as fact witnesses

The text indicates that the order implicates that they were witnesses, so my statement was correct


Premise: The Bloc Quebecois believes that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal, a more significant support for this international court, which is playing a fundamental role with regards to the aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Hypothesis: The aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina has caused the Bloc Quebecois to believe that a renewal of the SFOR mandate should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal.

The conflict is definitely the reason why the group believes that there should be a renewal. Without a conflict, then there would be no need for this conversation.


Premise: I don't find it beyond the scope of direct. It's appropriate cross-examination. It's overruled on that basis. We're getting argumentative only because I think the witness and counsel are talking over each other. Each of you let the other finish before you start talking.

Hypothesis: Take turns to be less argumentative.


Premise: The leadership in advocating these Young Offenders Act reforms has been provided in particular by the hon. member for Crowfoot, the hon. member for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, the hon. member for Surrey North, the hon. member for Langley-Abbotsford and many others of my colleagues.

Hypothesis: The leadership includes four individuals.

There are four individuals referenced, so we know there are at least that many.


Premise: That notwithstanding Rule 27(3), the Order of the Day for the second reading motion of Bill S-11, An Act to amend the Criminal Code to prohibit coercion in medical procedures that offend a person's religion or belief that human life is inviolable, a public bill, be now restored to the Order Paper , for the purpose of reviving the Bill.

Hypothesis: Bill S-11 was created in order to prevent something from happening.

It was made to prohibit coercion in medical procedures that offend a person's religion... that is made to prevent something so my statement is definitely true.


Premise: The Liberal member who just spoke is not going to support this bill and it really puzzles me why a member of the government, not just a member of the House, would stand up in this place, look the Canadian public in the eye by way of the television camera and say ``I will not support your having access to information about how we spend your tax dollars''.

Hypothesis: The last speaker, who was a liberal member, was not supportive at all of the proposed bill, regardless of its merits

The speaker did not support the bill, so my statement was correct


Premise: Mr. Speaker, yesterday I wrote to the prime minister asking him whether his government would not see it appropriate to extend to the end of the month of January 1998 the period for charitable donations, to allow all charities in Canada a chance to solicit funds for the cause they defend given the postal strike we have just experienced.

Hypothesis: They want to extend the period for charitable donations beyond 1982

They want to extend the period for charitable donations up to 1998, so that is beyond that period


Premise: What I submit -- well, first of all, even the petitioners acknowledge that, as far as prospective limits are concerned, that isn't a judgment that this Court is being made to ask and, in fact, the petitioners acknowledge that it isn't a judgment that this Court should make, so the only point that the petitioners --

Hypothesis: The petitioners know everything.

The context listed the petitioners as a reference for the decisions made by the speaker, but the petitioners don't know everything per the context,only what is listed. How much they know can only be assumed.


Premise: In this regard both the Dickson advisory group and the Somalia commission recommended the establishment of a military prosecutor, independent of the chain of command, to deal with serious disciplinary and criminal charges and to be responsible for the conduct of all cases before courts martial.

Hypothesis: The prosecturo didn't fix anything.


Premise: Well, I think they ought to look at us as a country that understands freedom where it doesn't matter who you are or how you're raised or where you're from, that you can succeed. I don't think they'll look at us with envy. It really depends upon how our nation conducts itself in foreign policy.

Hypothesis: They look at us with envy.

He said they didn't think they would look at us with envy, but it didn't say definitively. There is no way to know for sure whether we are looked at with envy.


Premise: We would assume that when we are dealing with Bill C-66, an act that deals with housing in Canada, there would be some reference or some indication that the government is actually going to do something about the homeless situation, but in fact the answer is that it is doing absolutely nothing.

Hypothesis: Bill C-66 is going into effect in Canada.

It doesn't state if it is going into effect.


Premise: The fact is that there have been markets shut to us that we haven't stood up and fought for. I'm going to fight for a fair trade playing field for the American worker. And I will fight for the American worker just as hard as I fight for my own job. That's what the American worker wants. And if we do that, we can have an impact.

Hypothesis: The American worker wants more access.


Premise: Can the Minister of National Defence tell us whether such a program is indeed in the works and whether the government is getting ready not to renew the lease with the Fort Saint-Jean campus in order to resume full possession of the royal military college facilities in Saint-Jean?

Hypothesis: Fort Saint-Jean campus will not be renewed.

They are asking whether it will be renewed or not so they don't know if it will be.


Premise: Is the Prime Minister aware that his Minister of Human Resources Development is not even capable of meeting with Quebec's education sector, including students, because the latter are demanding that the Government of Quebec be present at these meetings, and that the federal government has no other choice now but to rethink its decision?

Hypothesis: The Prime Minister has no family

There is no way of telling from this passage whether the prime minister has family


Premise: We need the independence to make sure that the office will not interfere with the military structure whatsoever and that it will act as an ombudsman for people in the military structure, either family members in the military, the military personnel themselves or civilian members of the Canadian Armed Forces who are involved with the military.

Hypothesis: They will always have independence.

The statement was arguing why they needed independence, however there is no way to know if they will always have independence. That sort of thing can change as time goes on.


Premise: -- what weighs in that balance, because to go back for one second, in practical, economic terms I gather the difference between a copyright that lasts for 100 years, lasts for 1,000 years, lasts forever, is probably something less than 1,000 -- on $1,000 a penny.

Hypothesis: Going back one second is important.

It's never directly stated the importance of going back for one second, only what can be achieved. It's only implied that it's important, but it's not in the context.


Premise: I certainly want to add my thanks and congratulations to Dr. Henry Friesen, who has provided leadership to the country as head of the Medical Research Council for a long period of time, and who has worked very hard to move that model toward the one we have today, and who in fact talked himself out of a job.

Hypothesis: The speaker was very poor.

It isn't known if they are rich or poor.


Premise: These criteria and conditions, pillars of Canada's health care system, are: one, reasonable access to medically required services unimpeded by charges at the point of service or other barriers; two, comprehensive coverage for medically required services; three, universality of insured coverage for all provincial residents on equal terms and conditions; four, portability of benefits within Canada and abroad; and five, public administration of the health insurance plan on a non-profit basis.

Hypothesis: The system only costs the rich money.

It isn't known who the system costs the most money.


Premise: Since 1982, the federal government has been dragging along, like a ball and chain, a constitution that has never been accepted by one whole founding people, by one whole province, one of the most important provinces, one that was there from the beginnings of Canada, that was the place where European life in North America began.

Hypothesis: The federal government has no constitutional authority.

If the constitution has not been fully ratified, the constitutional basis for the authority of the federal government (not the *actual* authority of the government) is in question, therefore my statement is neither definitely correct nor incorrect.


Premise: I don't think we agree on that. I would certainly also be judicious in evaluating any potential use of American troops overseas. I think we have to be very reticent about that. But look, Jim, the world is changing so rapidly. The way I see it, the world is getting much closer together.

Hypothesis: The speaker is male.

Reason:  The gender of the agent is never specified.  Why: A male name is used in the context.


Premise: But there were comments from Bill Buckingham about brainwashing, and I remember hearing that, the whole thing about brainwashing, because it dealt with going to college and getting this education and students who go to college become brainwashed. And I was very upset by that because I attended college and I don't feel as if I were brainwashed.

Hypothesis: The speaker knows Bill Buckingham.

Reason:  The speaker knows the comments, but may not know Bill Buckingham personally. Why:  Buckingham's name is in the contaxt.


Premise: I am -- you know it's really interesting. I tell the people on the campaign trail, when I asked Laura to marry me, she said, "Fine, just so long as I never have to give a speech. "I said, "OK, you've got a deal. "Fortunately, she didn't hold me to that deal. And she's out campaigning along with our girls. And she speaks English a lot better than I do. I think people understand what she's saying.

Hypothesis: His girls are still in school.

I'm right. There is no indication of the girl's ages. The could still be school aged.


Premise: The members on the government side of the House should listen to the Law Society of British Columbia which wrote to the solicitor general and said an essential principle of a democratic government is that all people are equal before the law and are equally entitled to fairness and due process.

Hypothesis: The members on the government side of the House have fun on weekends

The members on the government side of the House may or may not have fun on weekends but it isn't known


Premise: I dare not say it was a revelation to him because he was already quite aware of the problem, but he came face to face with it and was able to see with his own eyes-the member for Chambly is a hands-on kind of guy-how important low income housing, co-op housing, is in terms of social action.

Hypothesis: He didn't pay attention in school

It is unknown whether he paid attention in school


Premise: Whereas if you don't accept the Copyright Clause claim, then, in order to make the First Amendment analysis we've simply got to say, well, gee, is the promotion of useful art and so on more important than the public domain, and can we say that that allows a distinction between 50 years and 70 years?

Hypothesis: The First Amendment is the only one that matters.

The First amendment is the only amendment stated in the context, but it's not stated anywhere that it's the only one that matters.


Premise: The hon. member also knows that in the KPMG study the industries that were looked at were high tech industries, high value industries and the pharmaceutical industries; all industries which have grown and were spawned as a result of the government's research and development policies.

Hypothesis: The KMPG study cannot tell us anything of significance.

I think my statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect because, given the context, it's impossible to know the value of the study or the methods it used. My statement tricked the system because it made a strong value statement, that it wanted to flag as correct or incorrect instead of neither.


Premise: Five million Americans have lost their health insurance in this country. You've got about a million right here in Arizona, just shy, 950,000, who have no health insurance at all. 82,000 Arizonians lost their health insurance under President Bush's watch. 223,000 kids in Arizona have no health insurance at all.

Hypothesis: Most people in Arizona have health insurance.

This is definitely a neither statement and the computer screwed it up even more by marking it definitely incorrect. Nothing about the overall population of Arizona or the percentage of people with health insurance is mentioned.


Premise: New question, new subject. Vice President Gore, on the environment. In your 1992 book you said, quote, "We must make the rescue of our environment the central organizing principle for civilization and there must be a wrenching transformation to save the planet." Do you still feel that way?

Hypothesis: It isn't known where the quote came from.


Premise: I believe the best way to help our small businesses is not only through small-business loans, which we have increased since I've been the president of the United States, but to unbundle government contracts so people have a chance to be able to bid and receive a contract to help get their business going.

Hypothesis: The speaker is not anyones supervisor

The president is necessarily at one persons supervisor, the system misses this


Premise: The Butlers were forced to hire a lawyer and appeal the judge's orders on the grounds that, first, the judge applied an improper standard of proof; second, he relied on inadmissible evidence and hearsay; third, the hearing violated the principles of fundamental justice; fourth, the parents were not properly informed of the nature of the hearing; and fifth, the parents were not given an opportunity to call evidence.

Hypothesis: The Butlers were found innocent.


Premise: We spoke to ethics counsellor Howard Wilson January 30 about the minister's involvement with this legislation and he answered that the Canada Steamship Line's pension fund is incorporated under the Pension Fund Societies Act under the auspices of the Department of Industry and will not therefore be directly affected by the Pension Benefit Standards Act.

Hypothesis: The ethics counsellor is Howarddss Wilson

His name is Howard making my statement incorrect. The model must have problems with the spelling of words.


Premise: Our patriotism emanates from and has its source not only in ourselves and in our relationships with our fellow citizens, but also in the majesty of nature and the physical grandeur and beauty of our great dominion from the misty Grand Banks of Newfoundland to the Rocky Mountains, Vancouver and Queen Charlotte Islands''.

Hypothesis: Our patriotism is based on two locations.

It is based on many things, including ourselves and in our relationships with our fellow citizens, but also in the majesty of nature and the physical grandeur and beauty of our great dominion from the misty Grand Banks of Newfoundland to the Rocky Mountains, Vancouver and Queen Charlotte Islands''. To say that it is based on two locations would be wrong.


Premise: Everything is a gift from the Almighty. And as I measure the words of the Bible -- and we all do; different people measure different things -- the Koran, the Torah, or, you know, Native Americans who gave me a blessing the other day had their own special sense of connectedness to a higher being. And people all find their ways to express it.

Hypothesis: Atheists believe in the bible too.


Premise: A brown field is an abandoned industrial site that just sits idle in some of our urban centers. And people are willing to invest capital in the brown fields don't want to do so for fear of lawsuit. I think we ought to have federal liability protection, depending upon whether or not standards have been met.

Hypothesis: People don't want to invest because it is ugly.

They don't want to invest because of a lawsuit.


Premise: For those who have just now picked up the debate, we are dealing with the fact the Reform Party thinks that we should target any future surpluses toward paying down the debt and offering tax relief, and chastising the government for its plans to spend 50% of any new spending or any budgetary surplus on new spending.

Hypothesis: the intended audience is long term followers that the speaker is addressing

The speaker is addressing new followers as the phrase "for those who have just now picked up the debate ' implies. This makes my statement incorrect. The model was probably thrown off by the way I worded my sentence. I phrased my statement in a way that might fool the model's method of evaluating statements.


Premise: Bob, we relied upon a company out of England to provide about half of the flu vaccines for the United States citizen, and it turned out that the vaccine they were producing was contaminated. And so we took the right action and didn't allow contaminated medicine into our country. We're working with Canada to hopefully -- that they'll produce a -- help us realize the vaccine necessary to make sure our citizens have got flu vaccinations during this upcoming season.

Hypothesis: A company from continental europe was relied on

England is not in continental europe, they system missed this


Premise: Your Honor, one thing I might ask, since it is perhaps likely that issues are going to arise during the deposition, I'm wondering if we could now attempt to schedule the deposition at a time when everybody, including Your Honor, might be available to intercede.

Hypothesis: They want to have someone fill in for the judge during the deposition.

They are saying that they want to deposition when the judge is AVAILABLE. They don't want someone to fill in... they make it clear that the judge needs to be available. So the statement that they would be happy with someone filling in is incorrect.


Premise: I was hunting in Iowa last year with a sheriff from one of the counties there, and he pointed to a house in back of us, and said, "See the house over? We just did a drug bust a week earlier, and the guy we arrested had an AK-47 lying on the bed right beside him. "

Hypothesis: The drug bust happened in an apartment.

The sheriff said see this HOUSE over there... not apartment. The drug bust happened in a house.


Premise: And so they're looking for ways to satisfy their desire for a better life and still reduce pollution at the same time. I think that holding onto the old ways and the old argument that the environment and the economy are in conflict is really outdated.

Hypothesis: They are always looking for ways to have a better life, even if that means it will come at the expense of the environment

The text stated they are looking for ways to have a better life and protect the environment, so my statement was incorrect


Premise: I recall my husband speaking. In fact, he hadn't prepared to speak, but he was very upset, as many people in the audience were, and he stood up to speak. I don't remember his exact comments, but, again, it was a warning to the school board and -actually, not necessarily a warning, but just sort of reiterating what science teachers do in their science classes and how there is really no conflict here with the textbook.

Hypothesis: The husband only spoke about one of the subjects of textbooks and science but not both.

It said he talked about science classes and about textbooks so he spoke about both. My statement that he only spoke about one is incorrect.


Premise: Actually, I am, because I recall them -- an organization actually sending the library those books, because there was controversy in those books being put in there, too. And there were many members of the community who had called to see whether those books had actually gotten there or not, into the library, because we weren't certain that those books were going to be allowed in the library, permitted in the library.

Hypothesis: All books are controversial.

Reason:  There are non controversial books.  Why:  In this context, all mentioned books are controversial.


Premise: And as for why it happened, I'm no expert on the Texas procedures, but what my friends there tell me is that the governor opposed a measure put forward by Democrats in the legislature to expand the number of children that would be covered. And instead directed the money toward a tax cut, a significant part of which went to wealthy interests.

Hypothesis: The wealthy were negatively impacted by the measure.

The measure was about children, not the wealthy.


Premise: One percent of America got $89 billion last year in a tax cut, but people working hard, playing by the rules, trying to take care of their kids, family values, that we're supposed to value so much in America -- I'm tired of politicians who talk about family values and don't value families.

Hypothesis: The majority of Americans had to pay the huge sum of 89 billion dollars less due to the tax cut that was quickly passed

The text stated that 1% of americans paid 89 billion less, that is not the majority, so my statement was incorrect


Premise: And I mentioned one, and that's the Balkans. I would very much like to get our troops out of there. I recognize we can't do it now, nor do I advocate an immediate withdrawal. That would be an abrogation of our agreement with NATO. No one is suggesting that.

Hypothesis: NATO would welcome the withdrawal of the troops out of the Balkans

The speaker had an agreement with NATO for the troops to stay in the Balkans so my statement was incorrect


Premise: In all due respect, I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about -- oh, never mind. Anyway, let me quote the Lewin report. The Lewin report is a group of folks who are not politically affiliated. They analyzed the senator's plan. It cost $1.2 trillion.

Hypothesis: The Lewin report is an avenue

It is explicitly stated that the Lewin report is a group of people. It also stands to reason that when I said it isn't a street, that it would have to not be an avenue either, as those are synonyms.


Premise: When he approached Mr. Landry, did the Prime Minister tell him that this intervention in the field of education was raising hackles in Quebec and that everyone involved-students, the academic community and federalists and sovereignists alike-strongly opposed the federal government's intrusion into an area of provincial jurisdiction?

Hypothesis: Mr. Landry is the Prime Minister in Canada.

The statement mentions the Prime Minister conversing with Mr Landry about the field of education in Quebec.  Mr Landry cant be the Prime Minister.   I don't think the system could recognize this.


Premise: Honourable senators will remember that the committee which reported just prior to Christmas received information about a number of cases in which claims were brought by people living in poverty in Canada, usually women and children, both alluded to by my colleagues who spoke before me, against our federal and provincial governments.

Hypothesis: The report from this committee came about five days before the new year began.


Premise: The 1989 Newcastle earthquake occurred in Newcastle, New South Wales on Thursday, 28 December. The shock measured 5.6 on the Richter magnitude scale and was one of Australia's most serious natural disasters, killing 13 people and injuring more than 160. The damage bill has been estimated at A$ 4 billion (including an insured loss of about $1 billion).

Hypothesis: The earthquake occurred on the fifth day of the week.

The earthquake occurred on a Thursday. The system was confused by the day.


Premise: Fredrik Herman Gade was born at Frogner Manor near Christiania (now Oslo), Norway. He was a son of United States consul Gerhard Gade (1834–1909) and his American-born wife Helen Allyne. He was a brother of John Allyne Gade, a nephew of Fredrik Georg Gade, Sr and a first cousin of Herman Gerhard Gade and Fredrik Georg Gade, Jr.

Hypothesis: Fredrik Herman Gade is younger than Gerhard Gade.

Fredrik Herman Gade is the son of Gerhard Gade, which makes him younger. The model might not know this logical conclusion.


Premise: Harold Homer Chase (February 13, 1883 – May 18, 1947), nicknamed "Prince Hal", was a first baseman and manager in Major League Baseball, widely viewed as the best fielder at his position. During his career, he played for the New York Highlanders (1905–1913), Chicago White Sox (1913–1914), Buffalo Blues (1914–1915), Cincinnati Reds (1916–1918), and New York Giants (1919).

Hypothesis: Harold Homer Chase played for the Highlanders as a 25 year old.

He was born in 1883 and played for the Highlands in 1908 which would make him 25 at the time. I think the system has trouble with specifics in a range of time.


Premise: Xbox 360 applications are non-game software applications designed to run on the Xbox 360 platform. Xbox 360 applications can either be stored on the console's hard disk drive or on a USB flash drive. Often, an Xbox Live Gold membership is also required to access some applications, as well as subscriptions correspondent to the applications. Some of these applications are country specific.

Hypothesis: Xbox 360 applications do not need to be stored on the console's hard disk drive.

Actually, Xbox 360 apps can either be stored on the console's hard disk drive or on a USB flash drive. "OR" fooled the model.


Premise: Nagasa District was one of the four districts created in former Awa Province on April 1, 1889. Much of the area of the district was part of the former Hanabusa Domain. At the time of its foundation, the district consisted of two towns (Kamogawa and Amatsu) and nine villages. On April 1, 1897, Nagasa District was merged into Awa District, Chiba.

Hypothesis: Nagasa District was created more than 1 million seconds ago.

There are 3600 seconds in an hour, 1 million seconds is 277 hours, which is only 11 days, and this district was created in 1889. it's difficult because 1 million seconds is a weird measurement.


Premise: Tenements (of the Anointed Flesh) is the fourth and final studio album by British industrial black metal band The Axis of Perdition. It was released on May 2, 2011, on Code666 Records. Dan "Storm" Mullins could not play drums on this album due to a broken arm so drums were programmed.

Hypothesis: The Axis of Perdition could have released more albums after Tenements (of the Anointed Flesh), but they have not.

It's a fact that the Tenements album was their last.


Premise: The Toti class were submarines built for the Italian Navy in the 1960s. They were the first submarines designed and built in Italy since World War II. These boats were small and designed as "hunter killer" anti-submarine submarines. They are comparable to the German Type 205 submarines and the French Aréthuse class submarines.

Hypothesis: The subs were built for the Italian Navy, but maybe not by the Italian Navy.

We know they were built for the navy but we do not know if they were built by the navy


Premise: The Sun was an afternoon tabloid newspaper, first published under this name in 1910. It was acquired from Associated Newspapers by Fairfax Holdings in Sydney, Australia in 1953, as the afternoon companion to "The Sydney Morning Herald". The former Sunday edition, the "Sunday Sun" was discontinued and merged with the "Sunday Herald" into the tabloid "Sun-Herald" at the same time.

Hypothesis: Associated Newspapers purchased the sun


Premise: Phillip Douglas Coke (born July 19, 1982) is an American professional baseball pitcher for the Orix Buffaloes of Nippon Professional Baseball (NPB). He previously played in Major League Baseball (MLB) for the New York Yankees, Detroit Tigers, Chicago Cubs, Toronto Blue Jays, and Pittsburgh Pirates.

Hypothesis: Phillip Douglas Coke was a pirate

Phillip Douglas Coke played for the Pittsburgh Pirates


Premise: The Texas Wrestling Academy (formerly known as The Shawn Michaels Wrestling Academy) is a professional wrestling training school that was operated by Shawn Michaels and Rudy Boy Gonzalez. The school has produced many well-known wrestlers such as Daniel Bryan, Brian Kendrick, Paul London, Lance Cade, Shawn Hernandez, Matt Bentley and Milano Collection A.T.

Hypothesis: The TWA used to be known as the SMWA.

SMWA is an abbreviation of Shawn Michaels Wrestling Academy, and the Texas Wrestling Academy was known as this prior to its current name. The system was fooled because it did not take abbreviations into account.


Premise: Weimar Republic (German: "Weimarer Republik" ] ) was an unofficial, historical designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was "Deutsches Reich"; it had remained unchanged since 1871. In English the country was usually known simply as Germany.

Hypothesis: Germany was known as Deutsches Reich longer than it was known as Weimar Republic.

The moniker Weimar Republic was used from 1919 to 1933, while "Deutsches Reich" had remained unchanged since 1871. The model didn't do the math, maybe.


Premise: Deep Eddy Pool is a historic, man-made swimming pool in Austin, Texas. Deep Eddy is the oldest swimming pool in Texas and features a bathhouse built during the Depression era by the Works Progress Administration. The pool began as a swimming hole in the Colorado River, became a resort in the 1920s, and is today a popular swimming pool operated by the City of Austin.

Hypothesis: A historic, man made swimming pool located in the Colorado River has the comical nickname of "Deep Eddy".

Deep Eddy is in the Colorado River and the system may not recognize the name as comical.


Premise: Robin Rimbaud (born 1964) is an electronic musician who works under the name Scanner due to his use of cell phone and police scanners in live performance. He is also a member of the band Githead with Wire's Colin Newman and Malka Spigel and Max Franken from Minimal Compact.

Hypothesis: Robin Rimbaud came out of the womb in 1964.


Premise: Bilbao Arena is an indoor arena in the neighbourhood of Miribilla in Bilbao, Spain. The central hall can hold up to 10,014 people for basketball games. The central hall is also used for concerts and other kinds of shows. The facilities also include swimming pools and gymnasiums for the use of the local residents.

Hypothesis: The central hall cannot hold (10,014+1) people for basketball games.

It's definitely correct because it can only hold up to 10,014 people for basketball games, therefore it cannot hold 10,015 people. It's difficult because the system probably just sees the 10,014 in the statement and doesn't understand that the (10,014+1) construction really means 10,015.


Premise: Joan Manel Balcells Fornaguera (born 20 June 1975) is a retired professional tennis player from Spain. He won one ATP Tour singles title in his career and reached the final in Scottsdale in 2002 (losing to Andre Agassi) and the semifinals in 2000 Heineken Open losing to Michael Chang.

Hypothesis: Joan and Andre Agassi played tennis together in Arizona.

Joan and Andre definitely played together in Arizona. The model associated Scottsdale with Arizona previously, so I'm not sure why it was fooled here.


Premise: The British Chess Variants Society (or BCVS) was an association of chess variant players and developers active between 1997 and 2010. The Society took over publication of "Variant Chess", a chess variant magazine which had been published since 1990; the magazine ceased publication with the dissolution of the Society.

Hypothesis: it ran for more than 10 years

it ran from 1997-2010, which is 13 years. not 10.


Premise: Christopher Ryan Collins (born April 19, 1974) is an American basketball player and coach from Northbrook, Illinois. He is currently the head coach at Northwestern University. Collins previously served as associate head coach of the Duke University men's basketball team and is the son of National Basketball Association (NBA) player, coach, and commentator Doug Collins.

Hypothesis: Chris Collins used to visit Duke campus.

Collins previously served as associate head coach of the Duke University men's basketball team, so of course he has been on campus for games and practices


Premise: The National Australia Bank is a heritage-listed bank building at 61 Churchill Street, Childers, Bundaberg Region, Queensland, Australia. It was designed by Hubert George Octavius Thomas and built  1900 . It is also known as Bank of Northern Queensland, Bank of Queensland, and National Bank of Australasia. It was added to the Queensland Heritage Register on 21 October 1992.

Hypothesis: The structure has celebrated its centennial.

celebrated centennial = over 100 years old


Premise: Shortcut Island is a crescent-shaped island 0.4 mi long, with three prominent indentations of the north shore, lying 0.7 mi SSE of Gamage Point and Palmer Station along the SW coast of Anvers Island. The suggestive name was given by Palmer Station personnel. The narrow, deep channel separating this island from Anvers Island is a shortcut from the station to the Biscoe Bay area by water.

Hypothesis: Palmer Station is not location on Shortcut Island.

Palmer Station is actually located on Anvers Island, not Shortcut Island.  The statement indicates that Shortcut Island is 0.7 miles south-southeast of Gamage Point and Palmer Station, which are along the SW coast of Anvers Island.


Premise: True Stories is a 1986 American film that spans the genres of musical, art, and comedy, directed by and starring David Byrne of the band Talking Heads. It co-stars John Goodman, Swoosie Kurtz, and Spalding Gray. Byrne has described the film as, "A project with songs based on true stories from tabloid newspapers. It's like "60 Minutes" on acid."

Hypothesis: True Stories (1986) draws on actual true stories from the press for the film's soundtrack.

The filmmaker David Byrne himself described the film's songs as being based on true stories from tabloids and newspapers. I think it was difficult for the system because I reworded it so well.


Premise: Diana, Our Mother: Her Life and Legacy is a 2017 documentary film broadcast in the United Kingdom by ITV on 24 July 2017 and the United States by HBO on 24 July 2017. It will also air on Seven Network in Australia, CBC in Canada, Three in New Zealand, NRK in Norway, YLE in Finland and TV2 in Denmark. It aired on Aug 20th, 2017 on CBC News Network.

Hypothesis: Diana, Our Mother: Her Life and Legacy is a telemovie documentary.

The original context described this as a television movie.


Premise: Karan Romesh Sharma (Hindi: करन शर्मा ; born 26 October 1981) is an Indian actor. He made his film debut in 2005 Bollywood film "Dil Jo Bhi Kahey..." starring opposite Amitabh Bachchan and directed and co-produced by his father Romesh Sharma. The film however did not do well, with Sharma receiving negative reviews. In 2003, he did a Mauritian series "C'est la vie", which was telecast in Mauritius.

Hypothesis: Karan works in other countries besides his native India


Premise: Naulakha Bazaar (Punjabi, Urdu:  ) is Bazaar (market) located in Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. This Bazaar was established in 1633 and is located in Lahore Fort near Naulakha Pavilion. The Shaheed Ganj Mosque is located in Naulakha Bazaar. The used clothing and crockery bazaar, landa bazaar, is also located near Naulakha Bazaar.

Hypothesis: The bazaar was founded in  17th century.


Premise: Anthony Paul Beke (born 20 July 1966), known professionally as Anton du Beke, is a British ballroom dancer and television presenter, best known as a professional dancer on the BBC One celebrity dancing show "Strictly Come Dancing" since the show began in 2004. In 2009, he presented the UK version of "Hole in the Wall", for the BBC, replacing Dale Winton after being a team captain in 2008.

Hypothesis: Anthony Paul Beke grew up in the 70's

This is correct because he was born in the 60's, therefore he grew up in the 70's


Premise: Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer is a documentary directed by Alex Gibney about former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer and the sex scandal that derailed his political career. It premiered at the 2010 Tribeca Film Festival on April 24, 2010; on iTunes and Magnolia On Demand on October 1, 2010; and in movie theaters in limited release on November 5, 2010.

Hypothesis: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer has talking


Premise: Henry Aldrich Plays Cupid is a 1944 American comedy film directed by Hugh Bennett and written by Muriel Roy Bolton and Val Burton. The film stars Jimmy Lydon, Charles Smith, John Litel, Olive Blakeney, Diana Lynn and Vaughan Glaser. The film was released in April 1944, by Paramount Pictures.

Hypothesis: The film was released more than 2.2 billion seconds ago.

2.2 billion seconds is around 70 years and it was released over 75 years ago. It's difficult because I used a large and unusual measurement that the system has trouble calculating and understanding.


Premise: Naamloze vennootschap (] ; correctly abbreviated nv, however, often abbreviated N.V. or NV) is a legal structure of a company (of the sort "public company") conformable law in the Netherlands, Belgium, Indonesia, and Suriname. The company is owned by shareholders, and the company's shares are not registered to certain owners, so that they may be traded on the public stock market.

Hypothesis: the abbreviation for Naamloze vennootschap is the same as a US state


Premise: The 2002 Scottish Claymores season was the eighth season for the franchise in the NFL Europe League (NFLEL). The team was led by head coach Gene Dahlquist in his second year, and played four of its home games at Hampden Park in Glasgow and one at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland. They finished the regular season in fourth place with a record of five wins and five losses.

Hypothesis: Gene dahlqust  was not the first coash

It says it was the teams eight season but his second, so he was not their first coash


Premise: So Solid Crew are an English garage, grime and hip hop group originating from Battersea, London which achieved wide success in the early 2000s. The group consisted of a large number of members, the most notable being Lisa Maffia, Romeo and Harvey. They are generally credited with having paved the way for the current generation of crossover UK hip hop stars.

Hypothesis: Other bands looked to So Solid Crew for inspiration.

The scenario states that So Solid Crew paved the way for other bands, suggesting a source of inspiration.


Premise: Church Mission Society Higher Secondary School (CMSHSS) is a higher secondary school located in Thrissur city, of Kerala state, in India. The school was started by CMS missionary in 1883. The school gives instruction in Malayalam and English and follows the Kerala state syllabus. It has classes from first standard to 12th standard.

Hypothesis: The Church Mission Society Higher Secondary School was formed by a religious person

The context states the school was formed by a missionary. A missionary is a person sent on a religious mission, so the inference is they are religious. The system did likely not understand that a missionary is religious.


Premise: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport (IATA: CCU, ICAO: VECC) is an international airport located in Kolkata, West Bengal, India, serving the Kolkata metropolitan area. It is located approximately 17 km from the city center. The airport was earlier known as Dum Dum Airport before being renamed after Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, a prominent leader of the Indian independence movement.

Hypothesis: The name Dum Dum Airport did not come from a prominent leader of the Indian independence movement.

Dum Dum Airport was RENAMED after a prominent leader of the Indian independence movement, so the name Dum Dum is not after a leader... The renamed vs named part confused the model.


Premise: Elliot Junior Uyi Omozusi (born 15 December 1988) is an English footballer who plays for Chelmsford City. Omozusi had two spells with Leyton Orient, playing over 100 games. He also played for Fulham, Norwich City and Charlton Athletic. Omozusi plays primarily at right back, but can also play in the centre of defence or in midfield.

Hypothesis: Omozusi was beneficial in different areas of the field

He can play right back and centre of defence. Unless the computer can understnd the context of being beneficail at differet fields, it will be difficult for the system to guess.


Premise: The School of Hotel Administration (SHA, more commonly known as the Hotel School) at Cornell University is a specialized business school in the SC Johnson College of Business at Cornell University, a private Ivy League university located in Ithaca, New York. Founded in 1922, it was the world's first four-year intercollegiate school devoted to hospitality management.

Hypothesis: They are pioneers in hospitality management


Premise: Yūki Mizuhara (水原ゆう紀 ) is a Japanese actress. She won the award for best actress at the 1st Yokohama Film Festival for the Nikkatsu "Roman Porno" film "". She also appeared in Nikkatsu's 1982 production "Red Scandal: Affair", a "thinly-veiled replica of Luis Buñuel's "Belle de Jour"."

Hypothesis: Yūki Mizuhara has no q