Abstract:
A system and method are disclosed that provide a simple and efficient layered video coding technique using a backward adaptive rate-distortion optimized data partitioning (RD-DP) of DCT coefficients. The video coding system may include an rate-distortion optimized data partitioning encoder and decoder. The RD-DP encoder adapts the partition point block-by-block which greatly improves the coding efficiency of the base layer bit stream without explicit transmission thereby saving the bandwidth significantly. The RD-DP decoder can also find the partition location in backward-fashion from the decoded data.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/401,300 filed Aug. 6, 2002, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention is related to scalable video coding systems, in particular, the invention relates to an efficient layered video coding technique using backward adaptive rate-distortion optimized data partitioning (RD-DP) of discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients. The invention has particular utility in connection with variable-bandwidth networks and computer systems that are able to accommodate different bit rates, and hence different quality images. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     Video is a sequence of pictures; each picture is formed by an array of pixels. The size of uncompressed video is huge. To reduce its size, video compression may be used to reduce the size and improve the data transmission rate. Various video coding methods (e.g., MPEG 1, MPEG 2, and MPEG 4) have been established to provide an international standard for the coded representation of moving pictures and associated audio on digital storage media. 
     Such video coding methods format and compress the raw video data for reduced rate transmission. For example, the format of the MPEG 2 standard consists of 4 layers: Group of Pictures, Pictures, Slice, Macroblock, Block. A video sequence begins with a sequence header that includes one or more groups of pictures (GOP), and ends with an end-of-sequence code. The Group of Pictures (GOP) includes a header and a series of one of more pictures intended to allow random access into the video sequence. 
     The pictures are the primary coding unit of a video sequence. A picture consists of three rectangular matrices representing luminance (Y) and two chrominance (Cb and Cr) values. The Y matrix has an even number of rows and columns. The Cb and Cr matrices are one-half the size of the Y matrix in each direction (horizontal and vertical). The slices are one or more “contiguous” macroblocks. The order of the macroblocks within a slice is from left-to-right and top-to-bottom. 
     The macroblocks are the basic coding unit in the MPEG algorithm. The macroblock is a 16×16 pixel segment in a frame. Since each chrominance component has one-half the vertical and horizontal resolution of the luminance component, a macroblock consists of four Y, one Cr, and one Cb block. The Block is the smallest coding unit in the MPEG algorithm. It consists of 8×8 pixels and can be one of three types: luminance(Y), red chrominance(Cr), or blue chrominance(Cb). The block is the basic unit in intra frame coding. 
     The MPEG 2 standard defines three types of pictures: Intra Pictures (I-Pictures) Predicted Pictures (P-Pictures); and Bidirectional Pictures (B-Pictures). Intra pictures, or I-Picture, are coded using only information present in the picture itself, and provides potential random access points into the compressed video data. Predicted pictures, or P-pictures, are coded with respect to the nearest previous I- or P-pictures. Like I-pictures, P-pictures also can serve as a prediction reference for B-pictures and future P-pictures. Moreover, P-pictures use motion compensation to provide more compression than is possible with I-pictures. Bidirectional pictures, or B-pictures, are pictures that use both a past and future picture as a reference. B-pictures provide the most compression since it uses the past and future picture as a reference. These three types of pictures are combined to form a group of picture. 
     The MPEG transform coding algorithm includes the following coding steps: Discrete cosine transform (DCT), Quantization and Run-length encoding 
     An important technique in video coding is scalability. In this regard, a scalable video codec is defined as a codec that is capable of producing a bitstream that can be divided into embedded subsets. These subsets can be independently decoded to provide video sequences of increasing quality. Thus, a single compression operation can produce bitstreams with different rates and reconstructed quality. A small subset of the original bitstream can be initially transmitted to provide a base layer quality with extra layers subsequently transmitted as enhancement layers. Scalability is supported by most of the video compression standards such as MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and H.263. 
     An important application of scalability is in error resilient video transmission. Scalability can be used to apply stronger error protection to the base layer than to the enhancement layers (i.e., unequal error protection). Thus, the base layer will be successfully decoded with high probability even during adverse transmission channel conditions. 
     Data Partitioning (DP) is used to facilitate scalability. For example in MPEG 2, the slice layer indicates the maximum number of block transform coefficients contained in the particular bitstream (known as the priority break point). Data partitioning is a frequency domain method that breaks the block of 64 quantized transform coefficients into two bitstreams. The first, higher priority bitstream (e.g., base layer) contains the more critical lower frequency coefficients and side information (such as DC values, motion vectors). The second, lower priority bitstream (e.g., enhancement layers) carries higher frequency AC data. 
     In particular, in conventional DP video coders (e.g., MPEG ), single layer bit stream is partitioned into two or more bit streams in the DCT domain. During transmission, one or more bit streams are sent to achieve bit rate scalability. Unequal error protection can be applied to base and enhancement layer data to improve robustness to channel degradation. Before decoding, depending on resource allocation and/or receiver capacity, the received bitstreams or a subset of them are merged into one single bitstream and decoded. 
     The conventional DP structure has advantages in a home network environment. More specifically, at its full quality, the rate-distortion performance of the DP is as good as its single layer counterpart while rate scalability is also allowed. The rate-distortion (R-D) performance is concerned with finding an optimal combination of rate and distortion. This optimal combination, which could also be seen as the optimal combination of cost and quality, is not unique. R-D schemes attempt to represent a piece of information with the fewest bits possible and at the same time in a way that will lead to the best reproduction quality. 
     It is also noted that in the conventional DP structure, the additional decoding complexity overhead is very minimal at its full quality while the DP provides wider range of decoder complexity scalability. This is because variable length decoding (VLD) of DCT run-length pairs—which is the most computational extensive part—now becomes scalable. 
     In the conventional DP structure, the DCT priority break point (PBP) value needs to be transmitted explicitly as side information. To minimize the overhead, the PBP value is usually fixed for all the DCT blocks within each slice or video packet. 
     While the conventional DP method is simple and has some advantages, it is not capable of adapting base layer optimization because only one PBP value is used for all blocks within each slice or video packets. Accordingly, there exists a need for video coding techniques adaptable to provide improved base layer optimization. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention addresses the foregoing need by providing an improved data partitioning technique by allowing the PBP value to adapt each at DCT block level. In one embodiment of the present invention, this can be achieved with minimal overhead (≈20 bits for each slice or video packet or even for each frame) by employing context-based backward adaptation. 
     One aspect of the present invention is directed to a system and method that provide a backward adaptive rate-distortion optimized data partitioning (RD-DP) of DCT coefficients. 
     In another aspect of the present invention, the RD-DP adapts the partition point block-by-block, hence greatly improves the coding efficiency of the base layer bit stream. This also allows a decoder to find the partition location in backward-fashion from the decoded data without explicit transmission, hence saving the bandwidth significantly. 
     In yet another aspect of the present invention, a Lagrangian parameter λ is calculated. The value of λ is determined to meet the rate budget Rb (for the base layer transmission channel) using a standard one-dimensional bisection algorithm. 
     On embodiment of the present invention is directed to a data partitioning method for a scalable video encoder. The method includes the steps of receiving video data, determining DCT coefficients for a plurality of macroblocks of a video frame, quantizing the DCT coefficients and converting the quantized DCT coefficients into (run, length) pairs. For each the plurality of macroblocks in the video frame, determining a ratio |X i   k | 2 /L i   2 , where a k-th (run, length) pair for an i-th block is L i   k  bits and has a coefficient value of X i   k . If a k-th ratio for thek-th (run, length) pair is less than λ or if the k-th ratio is a first ratio that is not less than λ, putting the k-th (run, length) pair into a base layer, otherwise if the k-th ratio for thek-th (run, length) pair is greater than λ, putting the k-th (run, length) pair into an enhancement layer, where λ is determined in accordance with a Lagrangian calculation. 
     Another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for determining a boundary between a base layer and at least one enhancement layer in a scalable video decoder. The method includes the steps of receiving the base layer and the at least one enhancement layer, the base layer and enhancement layer including data representing (run, length) pairs for a plurality of macroblocks in a video frame. For each the plurality of macroblocks in the video frame, determining a ratio |X i   k | 2 /L i   k , where a k-th (run, length) pair for an i-th block is L i   k  bits and has a coefficient value of X i   k . If the ratio for the k-th (run, length) pair is less than λ or if the k-th ratio is a first ratio that is not less than λ, read the k-th (run, length) pair from the base layer, otherwise if the ratio for the k-th (run, length) pair is greater than λ, read the k-th (run, length) pair from the at least one enhancement layer, where λ is determined in accordance with a Lagrangian calculation. 
     Yet another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a scalable decoder capable of merging data from a base layer and at least one enhancement layer. The decoder includes a memory which stores computer-executable process steps, and a processor which executes the process steps stored in the memory so as (i) receiving the base layer and the at least one enhancement layer, the base layer and enhancement layer including data representing (run, length) pairs for a plurality of macroblocks in a video frame, (2) for each the plurality of macroblocks in the video frame, determining a ratio |X l   k | 2 /L i   k , where a k-th (run, length) pair for an i-th block is L l   k  bits and has a coefficient value of X i   k , and (3) if the ratio for the k-th (run, length) pair is less than λ or if the k-th ratio is a first ratio that is not less than λ, read the k-th (run, length) pair from the base layer, otherwise if the ratio for the k-th (run, length) pair is greater than λ, read the k-th (run, length) pair from the at least one enhancement layer, where λ is determined in accordance with a Lagrangian calculation. 
     Yet another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a scalable transcoder. A single layer coded video bitstream (MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, H.264, etc) is partially decoded and the bitstream splitting point is determined for each DCT block based on the forementioned boundary determining method embodiment. Afterwards the VLC codes are split into two or more partitions based on the splitting points. The partial decoding involves variable length decoding, inverse scanning and inverse quantization only. No inverse DCT or motion compensation is needed. 
     This brief summary has been provided so that the nature of the invention may be understood quickly. A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof in connection with the attached drawings. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  depicts a video coding system in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. 
         FIG. 2  depicts a Rate-Distortion curve. 
         FIG. 3  depicts a computer system on which the present invention may be implemented. 
         FIG. 4  depicts the architecture of a personal computer in the computer system shown in  FIG. 3 . 
         FIG. 5  depicts a block diagram of a transcoder in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
       FIG. 1  illustrates a scalable video system  100  with layered coding and transport prioritization. A layered source encoder  110  encodes input video data. The output of the layered source encoder  110  includes a base layer  121  and one or more enhancement layers  122 – 124 . A plurality of channels  120  carry the output encoded data. A layered source decoder  130  decodes the encoded data. 
     There are different ways of implementing layered coding. For example, in temporal domain layered coding, the base layer contains a bit stream with a lower frame rate and the enhancement layers contain incremental information to obtain an output with higher frame rates. In spatial domain layered coding, the base layer codes the sub-sampled version of the original video sequence and the enhancement layers contain additional information for obtaining higher spatial resolution at the decoder. 
     Generally, a different layer uses a different data stream and has distinctly different tolerances to channel errors. To combat channel errors, layered coding is usually combined with transport prioritization so that the base layer is delivered with a higher degree of error protection. If the base layer  121  is lost, the data contained in the enhancement layers  122 – 124  may be useless. 
     In one embodiment of the present invention, the video quality of the base layer  121  is flexibly controlled at the DCT block level. The desired base layer can be controlled by adapting the PBP at the DCT block level by employing context-based backward adaptation. 
     It is noted that the purpose of DCT is to reduce the spatial correlation between adjacent error pixels, and to compact the energy of the error pixels into a few coefficients. Because many high frequency coefficients are zero after quantization, variable length coding (VLC) is accomplished by a runlength coding method, which orders the coefficients into a one-dimensional array using a so-called zig-zag scan so that the low-frequency coefficients are put in front of the high-frequency coefficients. This way, the quantized coefficients are specified in terms of the non-zero values and the number of the preceding zeros. Different symbols, each corresponding to a pair of zero runlength, and non-zero value, are coded using variable length codewords. 
     The scalable video system  100  preferably uses entropy coding. In entropy coding, quantized DCT coefficients are rearranged into a one-dimensional array by scanning them in a zig-zag order. This rearrangement puts the DC coefficient at the first location of the array and the remaining AC coefficients are arranged from the low to high frequency, in both the horizontal and vertical directions. The assumption is that the quantized DCT coefficients at higher frequencies would likely be zero, thereby separating the non-zero and zero parts. The rearranged array is coded into a sequence of the run-level pair. The run is defined as the distance between two non-zero coefficients in the array. The level is the non-zero value immediately following a sequence of zeros. This coding method produces a compact representation of the 8×8 DCT coefficients, since a large number of the coefficients have been already quantized to zero value. 
     The run-level pairs and the information about the macroblock, such as the motion vectors, and prediction types, are further compressed using entropy coding. Both variable-length and fixed-length codes are used for this purpose. 
     The design of the video system  100  is motivated by the operational rate-distortion (RD) theory. RD theory is useful in coding and compression scenarios, where the available bandwidth is known a priori and where the purpose is to achieve the best reproduction quality that can be achieved within this bandwidth (i.e., adaptive algorithms). 
     Discussed below is an illustration formulated to solve for the optimized partitions (i.e., base and enhancement layer partitions). In the following discussion it is assumed that there are “n” DCT blocks for each video frame and the bit rate budget Rb is known for the base layer partition. The rate budget is determined based on the minimal video quality requirement and channel throughput fluctuation. Then, the following optimization problem can be formulated to solve for the optimal partitions: 
                   min       P   ⁢           ⁢   1     ,           ,     P   n         ⁢       ∑     i   =   1     n     ⁢       Di   ⁡     (   Pi   )       ⁢           ⁢   subject   ⁢           ⁢   to   ⁢           ⁢       ∑     i   =   1     n     ⁢     Ri   ⁡     (   Pi   )               ≤   Rb     ⁢                   (   1   )             
 
     where Piε{0,1, . . . , K(i)}, i=1, . . . , n is the break point value for the i-th block and K(i) denotes the maximum (run, length) pairs in the i-th block, Ri(Pi) and Di(Pi) denote the corresponding bit rate and the distortion from the i-th block, respectively. 
     The optimization problem can be solved using an iterative bisection algorithm based on a Lagrangian optimization. The optimal partitioning point Pi satisfies the following condition for all i=1, . . . , n: 
                     ∂     Di   ⁡     (   Pi   )           ∂     Ri   ⁡     (   Pi   )           +   λ     =   0     ,     i   =   1     ,           ⁢   …   ⁢           ,   n           (   2   )             
 
     where the Lagrangian λ&gt;0 is determined by the standard bisection search so that the rate constraint in (1) is satisfied. 
     If the k-th DCT (run, length) pair for the i-th block is L i   k  bits and has a coefficient value of X i   k ; then, the slope for the rate-distortion (R-D) curve of the i-th block has the following set of discrete values: 
                 ∂     Di   ⁡     (   Pi   )           ∂     Ri   ⁡     (   Pi   )           =           Di   ⁡     (     P     i   +   1       )       -     Di   ⁡     (   Pi   )             Ri   ⁡     (     P     i   +   1       )       -     Ri   ⁡     (   Pi   )           ∈       {              X   i   k          2       L   i   k       }       k   =   1       K   ⁡     (   i   )                   (   3   )             
 
     Referring now to  FIG. 2 , a convex R-D curve is shown to illustrate how to determine the partition point and how the layered source decoder  130  can infer the partition point in a backward-adaptive fashion. It is noted that the layered source decoder  130  operates in the same way even if R-D curse is not convex. 
     From  FIG. 2 , it can seen that in general λ is decreasing function with respect to R and therefore, in general, the following relationship holds: 
                        X   i   1          2       L   i   1       ≥              X   i   2          2       L   i   2       ≥   …   ≥              X   i     K   ⁡     (   i   )              2       L   i     K   ⁡     (   i   )                   (   4   )             
 
     In accordance with Eq. (4) a partitioning algorithm for the DCT coefficients at the layered source encoder  110  side is given below. It is noted that to get to this point, the video data for a frame is converting it using the discrete cosine transform (DCT), the DCT coefficients are quantized, and then converted into binary codewords (run, length) using variable length coding (VLC). 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 for i=1,. . . ,n   { for each macroblock in frame 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 for k=1,. . . ,K(i)   { for each (run, length) pair 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Compute the corresponding X i   k ,L i   k . 
               
               
                   
                 Put the k-th (run, length) VLC 
               
               
                   
                 into base layer. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 if | X i   k  | 2  / L i   k  &lt; λ break; 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 } 
               
               
                   
                 put the remaining (run, length) pairs of i-th block 
               
               
                   
                 into ENH layer. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 } 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     The Lagrangian parameter λ may be separately encoded and transmitted as side information (i.e., overhead information). The layered source decoder  130  can find the boundary of the base layer  121  and enhancement layer  122 , as well as, find the synchronization using the following algorithm: 
     
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
             
               
             
           
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                 for i=1,. . . ,n  { for each macroblock in frame 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 for k=1,. . . ,K(i)   { for each (run, length)pair 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Read VLC (run, length) pair from 
               
               
                   
                 base layer. 
               
               
                   
                 Compute the corresponding  X i   k ,L i   k  . 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 if | X i   k  |  2  /L i   k  &lt;λ break; 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 } 
               
               
                   
                 Read the remaining (run, length) pairs of I-th 
               
               
                   
                 block from ENH layer. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 } 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     In practical implementation of variable length coding for the (run, length) pair, the R-D curve of  FIG. 2  may be non-convex because the VLC is only an approximation of the true entropy of the source. In that case, the test variable |X i   k | 2 /L i   k  is no more monotonic with respect to k. However, even in this case, it can be seen that the encoding and decoding algorithms can be perfectly synchronized since both break after the first (run, length) pairs that satisfies |X l   k | 2 /L i   k &lt;λ. 
     As discussed above, the only side information to be transmitted is the Lagrangian parameter λ. The value of λ is determined to meet the rate budget Rb of Eq.(1) using a standard one-dimensional bisection algorithm. However, the optimal value of λ can be a real number and should be quantized for transmission over the channel  120 . 
     In a preferred embodiment, the encoding precision of the quantized λ is determined as follows. The encoding precision is resolved by understanding that |X i   k | 2 /L i   2  has only discrete values for all i,k. For example, the maximum size of L i   k  is upper bounded by the maximum length of the codeword in the Huffman table, while the maximum value of |X i   k | is upper bounded by the DCT coefficient range. More specifically, the required bits to encode L i   k  and |X i   k | are upper bounded by log base2 (maximum length of codeword in Huffman table) and log base2 (DCT coefficient range), respectively. 
     For example, if the maximum length VLC is 64 bits long, and DCT coefficients are integer number between −2048 and 2047, then the value of λ can be quantized with log base2 (64)+log base2 (2048)=19 bits. Since this overhead needs to be sent only once at the vide frame header, it can be seen that the increase of the bit rate using the RD-DP is minimal. One of ordinary skill in the art will also understand that the λ value overhead may also be sent at the slice or video packet level to combat frame header losses. 
     Thus, by transmitting the λ value and the corresponding low frequency and some high frequency DCT coefficients (as the base layer  121 ) over a more reliable transmission channel, greater dynamic allocation of the DCT information is achievable. This allows for more control of the minimal quality of the video in case data from one or more of the enhancement layers  122 – 124  is lost. 
     The embodiments of the present invention discussed above are applicable to any scalable video coding system, e.g., MPEG 2, MPEG 4, H.263, etc. 
       FIG. 3  shows a representative embodiment of a computer system  9  on which the present invention may be implemented. As shown in  FIG. 3 , personal computer (“PC”)  10  includes network connection  11  for interfacing to a network, such as a variable-bandwidth network or the Internet, and fax/modem connection  12  for interfacing with other remote sources such as a video camera (not shown). PC  10  also includes display screen  14  for displaying information (including video data) to a user, keyboard  15  for inputting text and user commands, mouse  13  for positioning a cursor on display screen  14  and for inputting user commands, disk drive  16  for reading from and writing to floppy disks installed therein, and CD-ROM drive  17  for accessing information stored on CD-ROM. PC  10  may also have one or more peripheral devices attached thereto, such as a scanner (not shown) for inputting document text images, graphics images, or the like, and printer  19  for outputting images, text, or the like. 
       FIG. 4  shows the internal structure of PC  10 . As shown in  FIG. 4 , PC  10  includes memory  20 , which comprises a computer-readable medium such as a computer hard disk. Memory  20  stores data  23 , applications  25 , print driver  24 , and operating system  26 . In preferred embodiments of the invention, operating system  26  is a windowing operating system, such as Microsoft Windows95; although the invention may be used with other operating systems as well. Among the applications stored in memory  20  are scalable video coder  21  and scalable video decoder  22 . Scalable video coder  21  performs scalable video data encoding in the manner set forth in detail below, and scalable video decoder  22  decodes video data that has been coded in the manner prescribed by scalable video coder  21 . 
     Also included in PC  10  are display interface  29 , keyboard interface  30 , mouse interface  31 , disk drive interface  32 , CD-ROM drive interface  34 , computer bus  36 , RAM  37 , processor  38 , and printer interface  40 . Processor  38  preferably comprises a microprocessor or the like for executing applications, such those noted above, out of RAM  37 . Such applications, including scalable video coder  21  and scalable video decoder  22 , may be stored in memory  20  (as noted above) or, alternatively, on a floppy disk in disk drive  16  or a CD-ROM in CD-ROM drive  17 . Processor  38  accesses applications (or other data) stored on a floppy disk via disk drive interface  32  and accesses applications (or other data) stored on a CD-ROM via CD-ROM drive interface  34 . 
     Application execution and other tasks of PC  4  may be initiated using keyboard  15  or mouse  13 , commands from which are transmitted to processor  38  via keyboard interface  30  and mouse interface  31 , respectively. Output results from applications running on PC  10  may be processed by display interface  29  and then displayed to a user on display  14  or, alternatively, output via network connection  11 . For example, input video data which has been coded by scalable video coder  21  is typically output via network connection  11 . On the other hand, coded video data received from, e.g., a variable bandwidth-network is decoded by scalable video decoder  22  and then displayed on display  14 . To this end, display interface  29  preferably comprises a display processor for forming video images based on decoded video data provided by processor  38  over computer bus  36 , and for outputting those images to display  14 . Output results from other applications, such as word processing programs, running on PC  10  may be provided to printer  19  via printer interface  40 . Processor  38  executes print driver  24  so as to perform appropriate formatting of such print jobs prior to their transmission to printer  19 . 
     Another embodiment of the present invention is directed to a scalable transcoder. As shown in  FIG. 5 , a single layer coded video bitstream  200  (MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, H.264, etc) is partially decoded by a variable length decoder  210 . The DCT coefficient 220 are sent to an inverse scan/quantiation unit  230  and then to a partitioning point finder  240 . The bitstream splitting point is determined for each DCT block based on the boundary determining method embodiment discussed above. Afterwards VLC codes  250  are split into two or more partitions based on the splitting points. The results are provided to a variable length code buffer  260 . In accordance with the embodiment, the partial decoding involves variable length decoding, inverse scanning and inverse quantization only. No inverse DCT or motion compensation is needed 
     Although the embodiments of the invention described herein are preferably implemented as computer code, all or some of the embodiments discussed above can be implemented using discrete hardware elements and/or logic circuits. Also, while the encoding and decoding techniques of the present invention have been described in a PC environment, these techniques can be used in any type of video devices including, but not limited to, digital televisions/settop boxes, video conferencing equipment, and the like. 
     In this regard, the present invention has been described with respect to particular illustrative embodiments. For example, principles of the present invention as described in the embodiments above may also be applied to partition enhancement layers. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments and modifications thereto, and that various changes and modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.