Abstract:
Probing incident radar fields in a target test zone of a RCS test facility by exploiting angular radar response of a long and uniform rigid body supported horizontally across or vertically through the test zone. The rigid body is free to rotate about the broadside condition. Thus, the angle of the rigid body is gradually changed with respect to the direction of arrival of the incident wave. Radar echo from the rigid body is measured as a function of the rigid body angle. The data is then processed to yield a profile of the incident wave intensity along the rigid body. By varying the azimuth angle continuously while recording radar data, the data may be processed by the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm to yield a profile of the incident wave intensity along the rigid body.

Description:
BACKGROUND 
       [0001]    1. Field of the Invention 
         [0002]    This invention relates generally to test ranges and, more specifically, to radar test ranges. 
         [0003]    2. Related Art 
         [0004]    A radar cross-section (RCS) test range is a facility for measuring radar scattering properties of test objects, such as aircraft and missiles. Radar cross-section test ranges have been built to provide a “quiet” test zone for measuring radar signature of a test object. “Quiet” means that the incident radar wave in the test zone is acceptably free from undesired interference or unwanted reflections from elsewhere in or on the test range. 
         [0005]    Operating conditions of a test range can change over time, with changes of equipment, and with arrangement of radar absorbers. Thus, it is considered good practice to probe the test zone of the range at regular intervals to ensure that radar fields within the test zone behave as expected. Unfortunately, the time and equipment required for field probing can places additional cost burdens on test programs. Without a probe of the test range, actual measurements remain unquantified. 
         [0006]    Thus, there is a need for a fast, accurate, and cost effective method of performing a field probe. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0007]    The present invention allows probing incident radar fields in a target test zone of a RCS test facility. The present invention accomplishes probing by exploiting angular radar response of a long and uniform rigid body supported horizontally across or vertically through the test zone. The rigid body is rotated about the broadside condition. Thus, the angle of the rigid body is gradually changed with respect to the direction of arrival of the incident wave. Radar echo from the rigid body is measured as a function of the rigid body angle. Only the size of the rigid body itself is exposed to the incident wave. The data is then processed to yield a profile of the incident wave intensity along the rigid body. This probing can be routinely achieved for any desired frequency. 
         [0008]    By varying the azimuth angle continuously while recording radar data the data may be processed by the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm to yield a profile of the incident wave intensity along the rigid body. 
         [0009]    Processing the radar data by FFT yields a spectrum which can be interpreted as a representation of the field distribution along the length of the target, provided that the rigid body is long and uniform in its scattering behavior per unit length. 
         [0010]    In one aspect of the invention, a method is provided for determining characteristics of a radar wave field in a radar test range. The method includes suspending a rigid body approximately perpendicular to direction of travel of expected incident radar waves; rotating the rigid body with respect to the direction of travel of the generated incident radar waves; and collecting return information of the rigid body based on a sensed angle of the rigid body relative to the incident radar waves at a desired frequency. 
         [0011]    In yet another aspect of the invention, a system is provided for determining characteristics of a radar wave field in a radar test range. The system includes a radar system configured to generate incident radar waves at a desired frequency in a direction approximately perpendicular to a suspended rigid body; and a device configured to rotate the rigid body with respect to the direction of travel of the generated incident radar waves. 
         [0012]    In yet another aspect of the present invention, a radar test range is provided having a wave field, where the radar test range includes a rigid body suspended approximately perpendicular to the direction of travel of an expected incident radar wave, the rigid body configured to rotate in-and-out of the broadside condition; a radar for generating incident radar waves at a desired frequency in a direction approximately perpendicular to the rigid body; and a processor coupled for collecting return information of the rigid body from a sensor based on the sensed angle of the rigid body. 
         [0013]    Advantageously, the field probing technique of the present invention may be used with any long and uniform test object body, such as a rod or flat plate. The symmetry of the test object is not restricted, which means the test object can be cylindrical or flat in shape. Moreover, the test object can be made of any material, such as a metal or a dielectric. 
         [0014]    The test object does not have to be anchored on one side of the test chamber, but rather it can be allowed to freely rotate within the test field. Since the test object can be relatively broad, the field sampled is an average over the height (or width perpendicular to the longitudinal dimension) of the test object. Accordingly, the test object makes the field probing a practical exercise since sampling one time is enough to complete the probe. Finally, cross-range calibration using a previously derived equation is verified from the known length of the uniform test object. 
         [0015]    Additional advantages, objects, and features of the invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description which follows. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0016]    The accompanying drawings are included to provide further understanding of the invention, illustrate various embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operation of the invention. In the drawings, the same components have the same reference numerals. The illustrated embodiment is intended to illustrate, but not to limit the invention. The drawings include the following Figures: 
           [0017]      FIG. 1  is a cross-sectional view of radar test range; 
           [0018]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram of components of the present invention; 
           [0019]      FIG. 3A  is a simplified schematic representation (front-view) of components of the present invention; 
           [0020]      FIG. 3B  is a simplified schematic representation (top-view) of components of the present invention; 
           [0021]      FIG. 4  is a flow diagram illustrating a process for determining test zone characteristics in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0022]      FIG. 5  is a measured RCS pattern versus azimuth of a rigid body suspended within a radar test range in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0023]      FIG. 6  shows the Fourier transform spectra using the 2.4 GHz data, such as plotted in part in  FIG. 5  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0024]      FIG. 7  is an extended view of the two ends in the Fourier transform spectra at 2.4 GHz from results of  FIG. 6  in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0025]      FIG. 8  shows a summary of distance calibrations in the Fourier transform spectra for three rigid bodies of different lengths in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0026]      FIG. 9  shows Fourier transform spectra for the 60-foot rod at three representative frequencies (2.0, 2.4, and 2.8 GHz) after calibration of the cross-range distance in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0027]      FIG. 10  shows horizontal field-probes measured at three frequencies (2.0, 2.4, and 2.8 GHz) by translating a 14-inch sphere supported by strings within the distance of ±220 inch in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; 
           [0028]      FIG. 11  shows Fourier transform spectra for the 20-foot cylinder (supported horizontally by strings and measured at three frequencies) as a function of the cross-range distance in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and 
           [0029]      FIG. 12  shows Fourier transform spectra for the 8-foot by 8-foot flat plate at three frequencies as a function of the cross-range distance in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0030]      FIG. 1  is a cutaway side view of an example radar test range  100  in accordance with the present invention. Range  100  includes a radar system  102  that transmits a radar signal at a predetermined frequency, pulse width, pulse repetition rate, or scan pattern into a test zone  104 . Test zone  104  is defined by the space within a ceiling  106 , a floor  108 , an end wall  110 , and sidewalls (not shown). Floor  108  and ceiling  106  include turntables that provide motion for test objects. Although radar test range  100  is shown as an indoor range radar test range  100  may be an outdoor range. 
         [0031]    Test zone  104  is a space defined by x, y, and z-axes. The z-axis extends from a main radar reflector  114  of radar system  102  to the end wall  110 . The y-axis is orthogonal to the z-axis and extends between ceiling  106  and floor  108 . The x-axis is orthogonal to the y and z-axes. 
         [0032]      FIG. 2  is a block diagram of a system  200  formed in accordance with the present invention for analyzing a test zone of a test range, such as test zone  104  of test range  100 . System  200  includes a radar system, such as radar system  102 , a position indicator  202 , and a processor  206 . Radar system  102  sends an incident wave (radar signal) towards a linear scatterer, such as a rigid body (not shown) mounted within test zone  104 . The incident radar wave propagates along the z-axis to produce a substantially flat incident wave, to simulate a far field situation. Processor  206  receives radar return data of the rigid body. Processor  206  also receives position information of the rigid body from the rigid body position indicator  202 . Processor  206  generates an analysis of test zone  104  to determine properties of the far field radar signal. 
         [0033]      FIG. 3A  is a schematic representation (front-view) of components of the present invention. Rigid body  300  is suspended horizontally across range  100  using a suspension mechanism  302 , such as strings. In one exemplary embodiment, tests were conducted using a rigid body  300 , which is a solid rod ranging in length to about 60 feet with a diameter of about 1.74 inches. In this example, the solid rod weighs about 75 pounds, and is supported by eight pairs of strings  302  coupled) at eight attachment points  304   a  distributed along its length. Attachment points  304   a  occur at approximately +4, +11, +18, and +26 feet from the center of rigid body  300 . 
         [0034]      FIG. 3B  is a schematic representation (top-view) of components of the present invention. In this example, the eight pairs of strings  302  (thin) may be 30-pound testing arranged at non-flashing angles to the radar. In one embodiment, tie-points  304   b  are coupled to heavier cables  306  (medium) from upper turntable or UTT  116 . Tie-points  304   b  may be located at any suitable height, for example, at about 30 feet above the quiet-zone center line. In one embodiment, the eight strings  302  are divided into four each of high-capacity (denoted A, B, E, and F, each can support 3000 pounds maximum) and low-capacity (denoted  1 ,  3 ,  5 , and  6 , each can support 300 pounds maximum). Strings  302  may be positioned inside and around the rim of UTT  116 , for example, positioned just one foot inside the rim and around UTT  116 . In one embodiment, UTT is approximately 60 feet in diameter. It should be understood that strings  302  may be gradually tightened and their tensions evenly adjusted step-by-step for balancing rigid body  300 . It should also be understood that, as illustrated in  FIG. 3A , neither end of rigid body  300  is attached or otherwise fixed to any structure, but is configured to freely rotate as UTT  116  is made to rotate about its center. 
         [0035]    Alternatively, rigid body  300  can include various geometric shapes, such as a cylinder, and a square flat-plate. As discussed below, tests were conducted on a 20-foot long cylinder having a diameter of about 4.00 inches, with the two ends each covered by a flat plate. Tests were also conducted on a large flat plate, which was 8-feet square. 
         [0036]    It can be appreciated that the rigid body  300  can be attached to side walls in the test range in order to test incident waves in the vertical plane. The rigid body  300  can be setup between any horizontal and vertical angles. It can also be appreciated that the center of the rigid body may or may not be aligned with the center of the quiet zone. 
         [0037]      FIG. 4  illustrates an exemplary process s 400  performed by system  200  ( FIG. 2 ). Process  400  begins by performing a calibration of radar system  102  (s 402 ). Calibration of radar system  102  is performed by known calibration methods. 
         [0038]    In s 404 , rigid body  300  is suspended within the radar range approximately orthogonal to the direction of travel of an incident wave produced by radar system  102 . 
         [0039]    In step s 406 , radar system  102  collects radar return information of rigid body  300  at the predetermined frequency while rigid body  300  is rotated about a center  310  of rigid body  300  between predefined threshold angles out-of-plane with the incident wave. It will be appreciated that radar system  102  steps the frequency of the incident wave through a plurality of frequencies as rigid body  300  is being rotated. 
         [0040]    Next, in step s 408 , the collected frequency return information is processed using FFT of in phase and quadrature components of the collected return information. 
         [0041]    In step s 410 , field distribution information is generated by converting each range bin number result of the FFT to a distance value. 
         [0042]    It will be appreciated that the frequency of the generated incident wave can be varied (i.e., stepped. By varying the frequency while rigid body  300  is rotated, radar return information of the moving rigid body  300  can be attained for a plurality of frequencies at the same time. 
       EXAMPLE 
       [0043]    In the following example, 1.74-inch diameter rod, made of galvanized thin-wall steel was used as rigid body  300 . The rod measured 60 feet and was suspended in a horizontal plane from upper turntable (UTT)  116 . When UTT  116  is rotated, the angle between rigid body  300  and the direction of arrival of the incident radar wave is changed, thereby varying radar response of rigid body  300 . An example of the angular radar response in a test range is as shown in  FIG. 5  for a frequency of 2.4 GHz and vertical transmit/vertical receive (VV) polarization. The angular radar response (echo) is charted in logarithmic scale in decibels-square meter (dBsm).  FIG. 5  shows the typical azimuth dependence of the radar echoes at 2.4 GHz from the 60-foot long rod. Radar response (echo) is strongest within a narrow angular range. The independent variable is the UTT-angle, which within a small inclination (.+−.10.degree.) from the vertical plane normal to the incident wave direction, is linearly proportional to the out-of-plane angle subtended by rigid body  300  and the vertical plane. The UTT-angle for the broadside condition is defined as zero. Only the sections within ±5° of broadside are shown. The main peak is very narrow. The side-lobes are asymmetric. Note that the VV trace  502  is shifted down by −10 dB to avoid overlap, and that it is very similar to the HH trace  504 . 
         [0044]      FIG. 6  shows the Fourier transform spectra using the 2.4 GHz data, such as plotted in part in  FIG. 5 . Within the azimuth of ±20, there are 2180 pairs of I and Q. It is zero-padded to 2 14 =16384 to increase the granularity (but not the resolution). The complete spectrum goes from bins − 8192  to  8192 , but only the central portion within ±800 bins exhibits a plateau at about 35 dB above the noise floor. To avoid overlap, the VV  602  is shifted down by −3 dB. The plot appears similar to the HH  604 . Though the plateau is fairly flat at the center, it drops off quickly on the two sides. The oscillatory structure near bins ±750 are commonly shown as the Gibb&#39;s phenomena due to the finite length of rigid body  300 . 
         [0045]      FIG. 7  is an extended view of the two ends in the Fourier transform spectra at 2.4 GHz from results of  FIG. 6  to provide an understanding on the Gibb&#39;s phenomena and the influence on distance calibration, with the computed points in the Fourier transform spectra denoted by symbols. 
         [0046]    Since the objective is to generate a profile of the incident power in the test zone as a function of cross-range location, the cross-range distance to bin number is expressed using the appropriate formula as follows: 
         [0000]        R/λ=J* ( D   a −1)/(2 W*A*N ),  (1) 
         [0000]    where R is the cross-range distance, λ (=c/F) is the radar wavelength, J is the bin number measured from zero, N (=power of 2, zero-padded) is the total size of the data set, D a  is the number of measured data points, A is the UTT-angle swept (in radian), c is the speed of light, and W is a conversion factor which relates the UTT-angle to the actual out-of-plane angle for the rotation (if needed). 
         [0047]    In Equation (1), R and J have a unique relationship, once all the other parameters are known. If the rod length is also known, for example here 720 inches, then the point is picked at −13 dB down from the outer-most Gibb&#39;s peak on the left (bin — 1) and right (bin — 2), as denoted by a short bar. 
         [0048]    Such exercises have been carried out for other types of rigid bodies, namely a cylinder and a flat plate.  FIG. 8  shows a plot on the length difference (%) versus the level below peak. Table 1 below gives a summary on the numerical data used in the cross-range calibrations. Note that the length is always positive, though Bin — 1 and X1 both have a “−” sign in front. Various choices of window functions in the Fourier transform may mitigate the effect on the Gibb&#39;s phenomena, but not completely eliminate it. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Summary on the calibration of cross-range distances in the Fourier transform spectra 
               
               
                 for the three rigid bodies. All angular ranges are ± 20°, for the HH cases only. 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Object 
                 Data 
                 dB 
                   
                 X1 
                   
                 X2 
                 Length 
                 Error 
               
               
                 (Freq) 
                 Points 
                 (Down) 
                 Bin_1 
                 (inch) 
                 Bin_2 
                 (inch) 
                 (X2-X1) 
                 (%) 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Rod (60-foot length, 1.74-inch diameter) 
               
             
          
           
               
                 2.0 
                 2180 
                 −12.5 
                 −639.35 
                 −359.40 
                 641.81 
                 350.77 
                 720.17 
                 0.02 
               
               
                 2.4 
                 2180 
                 −12.9 
                 −767.37 
                 −359.46 
                 769.82 
                 360.62 
                 720.08 
                 0.01 
               
               
                 2.8 
                 2180 
                 −12.84 
                 −894.38 
                 −359.11 
                 897.84 
                 360.50 
                 719.61 
                 −0.05 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Cylinder (20-foot lengt, 4.00-inch diameter) 
               
             
          
           
               
                 2.0 
                 425 
                 −8.6 
                 −138.64 
                 −121.32 
                 135.64 
                 118.69 
                 240.01 
                 0.00 
               
               
                 2.4 
                 425 
                 −11.1 
                 −166.66 
                 −121.53 
                 162.66 
                 118.61 
                 240.14 
                 0.06 
               
               
                 2.8 
                 425 
                 −11.3 
                 −194.69 
                 −121.69 
                 189.69 
                 118.56 
                 240.25 
                 0.10 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Plate (8-foot height by 8.0156-foot wide, ~square) 
               
             
          
           
               
                 2.0 
                 525 
                 −8.2 
                 −90.588 
                 −48.982 
                 87.59 
                 47.361 
                 96.34 
                 0.16 
               
               
                 2.4 
                 525 
                 −8.33 
                 −108.61 
                 −48.937 
                 104.605 
                 47.134 
                 96.07 
                 −0.12 
               
               
                 2.8 
                 525 
                 −8.04 
                 −126.62 
                 −48.905 
                 121.623 
                 46.974 
                 95.88 
                 −0.32 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0049]    After the cross-range distances are calibrated for the three rigid bodies, the new results on the field distribution represented by the Fourier transform spectra can be plotted on the same scales for easy comparisons among the different targets. In  FIG. 9  (for the 60-foot long rod),  FIG. 11  (for the 20-foot long cylinder), and  FIG. 12  (for the 8-foot square flat plate), the ordinates are all in 5 dB/div., while the abscissa are all plotted between ±360 inches. For the comparison with the horizontal field-probes using the 14-inch sphere, the results are plotted on the same scales in  FIG. 10 . 
         [0050]    In  FIGS. 9-12 , the ordinate scale (y-axis) is for the HH trace at 2.0 GHz, while the HH&#39;s for 2.4 and 2.8 are shifted down successively by −10 dB each. The VV traces are shifted down by −3 dB each from the corresponding HH. The residuals on the outside of the region of interest (abscissa ±360 inches) are not included. 
         [0051]    In  FIG. 9 , the results are plotted at about 0.5 inch per pixel, which is in very high resolution. Two dashed lines are used to mark the cross-range boundaries of ±220 inches, within which 14-inch sphere field-probes was previously tested. Comparing  FIGS. 9 and 10  it is clear that the 60-foot long rod provides the same horizontal field-probe results as the sphere, even on a higher resolution and for a wider coverage. The agreement of the traces validates the method of the present invention. 
         [0052]    In  FIG. 11  where rigid body  300  is the 20-foot cylinder, the central parts of the traces carry the same resemblance of the field within about ±70 inches. Beyond that, the Gibb&#39;s phenomena mix in with the “true” field effect. The field thus sampled is an “average” over the vertical height of 4-inches. In  FIG. 12  where rigid body  300  is the 8-foot square plate, the Gibb&#39;s phenomena from the two ends meet in the center to totally mask the “true” response from the field. If a wider plate is used to extend the horizontal dimension, then the field sampled would be an “average” over its height. 
         [0053]    Accordingly, upon viewing the RCS data collected on the three types of rigid body  300 , each within a small azimuth-angle around the broadside condition, it is understood that the Fourier transform spectra on these data show a new promise for doing the “average” field probes better, faster, and more accurate. The results show that the angular dependence of the radar echo can be exploited regardless of the geometric shape (a cylinder or a plate). 
         [0054]    It should also be understood that the method of the present invention is not limited to a type of material for rigid body  300 . It has been shown that both metal and/or dielectrics may be used. Further, by rotating the target with UTT  116 , there is a small contribution to the Fourier spectrum due to the stationary point on the target, which is superimposed on the field response at that point. Using strong scatterers, such as used in the present invention, that contribution is minimal. Plotting the RCS data from a target translated along a given path produces a 2-way field-probe (relative ripples in dB versus distance) as an “average” over the physical area of that target (e.g., a sphere or a corner reflector). 
         [0055]    The method of the present invention for using the Fourier transform spectrum from the RCS measurements of a horizontal long-and-uniform rigid-body rotated within a small angle about the broadside condition also generates a 2-way field-probe, but of different resolutions. In the vertical, it is an “average” over the diameter of the rod (or the projected height of the object). In the horizontal, the sub-inch resolution is defined by the combination of the rotation rate in azimuth and the radar sampling time, which can be adjusted to higher or lower values as desired. 
         [0056]    Although the rotation of rigid-body  300 , of uniform scattering property and supported by strings  302 , in the horizontal plane has been described, the same method can be generalized to the rotation of a rigid body in the vertical plane. For the radar ranges not equipped with strings  302 , but having a lower turntable  118  ( FIG. 1 ), rigid body  300  may be supported on one or more foam tower(s) and rotated. 
         [0057]    It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.