Abstract:
The thermal treatment of transition metal oxide electrodes such as silver vanadium oxide cathode plates, contacted to titanium current collectors for the purpose of reducing polarization resistance in an alkali metal electrochemical cell, is described. The electrodes are exposed to an elevated temperature of at least about 225° C. for about 8 hours prior to cell fabrication. The present heat treatment regime is particularly useful in cathodes intended for fabrication into a cell powering an implantable medical device with improved polarization resistance as well as reduced heat dissipation.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention generally relates to the conversion of chemical energy to electrical energy, and more particularly, to an alkali metal electrochemical cell having a positive electrode comprising a mixed metal oxide. Preferred mixed metal oxides include silver vanadium oxide, copper vanadium oxide and copper silver vanadium oxide. According to the present invention, electrode plates of mixed metal oxide active material are thermally treated to reduce polarization resistance of cells incorporating the treated plates. 
     2. Prior Art 
     It is known in the prior art to heat both anode and cathode electrodes to increase and enhance the bond between the electrode active material and the current collector. Examples of this include U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,894 to Leap et al. which is directed to dehydrating a silver oxide paste contacted to a current collector. Heating takes place under nitrogen at a temperature of about 50° C. to 70° C. The heating protocol serves to enhance the bond between the active material and current collector without reducing the silver oxide to elemental silver. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,532,086 to Thibault et al. teaches increasing the bond between a silver foil current collector layer and a zinc metal anodic layer. Bonding is accomplished by pressing the current collector and the anodic layer between a plate heated to a temperature of about 650° F. (334° C.) to 750° F. (398° C.) and under an anvil pressure of about 1,500 to 5,000 psi. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is directed to transition metal oxide active materials that are heated subsequent to contact with a current collector. Electrodes fabricated in this manner are useful in both multiplate and jellyroll cell designs to decrease the electrical resistivity of the completed electrode assemblies. In turn, the discharge efficiency of the cell is increased. Also, heat dissipation of the present invention cells is improved in comparison to untreated cells of a similar electrode chemistry. Reduced heat dissipation is related to the reactivity of the cathode with the electrolyte. Reduced reactivity consequently benefits improved discharge efficiency. 
     These and other aspects of the present invention will become more apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the following description and to the appended drawings. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a graph of Li/SVO cells discharged to deliver periodic pulse trains and constructed, respectively, according to the prior art and according to the present invention having the cathode plates annealed prior to cell fabrication. 
     FIG. 2 is a graph constructed from the average pulse discharge readings of an unheated prior art Li/SVO cell in comparison to an annealed Li/SVO cell, wherein the cathode plates were made from free-standing sheets by calendaring a paste of an active admixture. 
     FIG. 3 is a graph constructed from heat dissipation readings versus depth of discharge for the cells discharged in FIG.  2 . 
     FIG. 3A is a graph of the average heat dissipated by the present invention cells as a percent of the average heat dissipated by the prior art cells. 
     FIGS. 4 and 5 are graphs constructed from the accelerated pulse discharge data of a prior art and a present invention Li/SVO cell constructed in a jellyroll configuration. 
     FIGS. 6 to  10  are graphs constructed from lithium cells having cathodes constructed from various active and non-active components of a SVO depolarizer heat treated prior to fabrication of cells. 
     FIG. 11 is a graph constructed from representative annealed and unheated cells of a Li/SVO chemistry wherein the cathode plates were of a pressed powder construction. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The electrochemical cell of the present invention comprises an anode electrode of a metal selected from Groups IA, IIA or IIIA of the Periodic Table of the Elements, including lithium, sodium, potassium, etc., and their alloys and intermetallic compounds including, for example, Li—Si, Li—Al, Li—B and Li—Si—B alloys and intermetallic compounds. The preferred anode comprises lithium. An alternate anode comprises a lithium alloy, such as lithium-aluminum alloy. The greater the amount of aluminum present by weight in the alloy, the lower the energy density of the cell. 
     The form of the anode may vary, but preferably the anode is a thin metal sheet or foil of the anode metal, pressed or rolled on a metallic anode current collector, i.e., preferably comprising nickel, to form an anode component. In the exemplary cell of the present invention, the anode component has an extended tab or lead of the same material as the anode current collector, i.e., preferably nickel, integrally formed therewith such as by welding and contacted by a weld to a cell case of conductive metal in a case-negative electrical configuration. Alternatively, the anode may be formed in some other geometry, such as a bobbin shape, cylinder or pellet to allow an alternate low surface cell design. 
     The electrochemical reaction at the cathode involves conversion into atomic or molecular forms of ions which migrate from the anode to the cathode. The cathode material comprises at least a first cathode active constituent which may be a metal, a metal oxide, or a mixed metal oxide comprising at least a first and a second metals or their oxides and possibly a third metal or metal oxide, or a mixture of a first and a second metals or their metal oxides incorporated in the matrix of a host metal oxide. The cathode active material may also comprise a metal sulfide. 
     The metal oxide or the mixed metal oxide can be constructed by the chemical addition, reaction, or otherwise intimate contact of various metal oxides and/or metal elements, preferably during thermal treatment, addition reaction, sol-gel formation, chemical vapor deposition or hydrothermal synthesis in mixed states. The active materials thereby produced contain metals, oxides and sulfides of Groups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements which includes the noble metals and/or other oxide compounds. 
     The metals or oxides of metals are selected from Groups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, as well as from Group VIII are thermally treated so as to effect the rapid preparation of the oxides or the respective metal elements themselves to be utilized further in the preparation of the cathode material. Such readily decomposable materials include, but are not limited to, those classes of compounds known as nitrates, nitrites, carbonates, and/or ammonium salts. The precursor materials (i.e., nitrates, nitrites, carbonates, ammonium compounds, etc.) may be decomposed in a combined state or individually decomposed and, thereafter, combined in an oxide-decomposable metal oxide compound and subsequently decomposed to form a cathode active material comprising a mixed metal oxide. 
     Preferred mixed metal oxides are prepared by mixing vanadium oxide with a metal or a metal oxide of a second metal and possibly a third metal. This admixture is thereafter reacted to form the mixed metal oxide. The second and third metals are most preferably selected from silver, copper and manganese. 
     One preferred mixed metal oxide has the general formula SM x V 2 O Y  wherein SM is a metal selected from the Groups IB to VIIB and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements and wherein x is about 0.30 to 2.0 and y is about 4.5 to 6.0 in the general formula. By way of illustration, and in no way intended to be limiting, one exemplary cathode active material comprises silver vanadium oxide (SVO) having the general formula Ag x V 2 O Y  in any one of its many phases, i.e., β-phase silver vanadium oxide having in the general formula x=0.35 and y=5.8, γ-phase silver vanadium oxide having in the general formula x=0.74 and y=5.37 and ε-phase silver vanadium oxide having in the general formula x=1.0 and y=5.5, and combination and mixtures of phases thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,609 to Liang et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference, describes an alkali metal cell having such a mixed metal oxide cathode active material. 
     Another preferred composite cathode material prepared from a mixture of vanadium oxide and a second metal or metal oxide and a third metal or metal oxide, preferably comprising silver and copper, according to the present invention includes V 2 O Z  wherein z≦5 combined with Ag 2 O z  wherein z=2 to 1 and CuO z , wherein z =0 to 1 to provide the mixed metal oxide having the formula Cu x Ag y V 2 O z , (CSVO). Thus, this composite cathode active material may be described as a metal oxide-metal oxide-metal oxide, a metal-metal oxide-metal oxide, or a metal-metal-metal oxide and the range of material composition found for Cu x Ag y V 2 O z , is preferably about 0.01≦x≦1.0, about 0.01 ≦y≦1.0 and about 5.01≦z≦6.5. Typical forms of CSVO are Cu 0.16 Ag 0.67 V 2 O z  with z being about 5.5 and Cu 0.5 Ag 0.5 V 2 O z  with z being about 5.75. The oxygen content is designated by z since the exact stoichiometric proportion of oxygen in CSVO can vary depending on whether the cathode material is prepared in an oxidizing atmosphere such as air or oxygen, or in an inert atmosphere such as argon, nitrogen and helium. U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,810 to Takeuchi et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference, describes an alkali metal cell having a counter electrode comprising such a composite cathode material. 
     Additional cathode active materials that are useful with the present invention include manganese dioxide, cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, copper oxide, titanium disulfide, copper sulfide, iron sulfide, iron disulfide, copper vanadium oxide, and mixtures thereof. 
     The above described cathode active materials are formed into an electrode for incorporation into an electrochemical cell by mixing one or more of them with a conductive additive such as acetylene black, carbon black and/or graphite. Metallic powders such as nickel, aluminum, titanium and stainless steel in powder form are also useful as conductive diluents when mixed with the above listed cathode active materials. The cathode electrode further comprises a binder material which is preferably a fluoro-resin powder such as powdered polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), powdered polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyethylenetetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), polyamides and polyimides, and mixtures thereof. More specifically, a preferred cathode active material comprises SVO in any one of its many phases, or mixtures thereof, and/or CSVO mixed with a binder material and a conductive diluent. 
     A preferred cathode active admixture according to the present invention comprises from about 80% to 99%, by weight, of a cathode active material comprising either one or both of the SVO and CSVO materials mixed with a suitable binder and a conductor diluent. The resulting blended cathode active mixture may be formed into a free-standing sheet prior to being contacted with a current collector to form the cathode electrode. The manner in which the cathode active mixture is prepared into a free-standing sheet is thoroughly described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,874 to Takeuchi et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference. 
     Further, cathode components for incorporation into a cell according to the present invention may also be prepared by rolling, spreading or pressing the cathode active mixture onto a suitable current collector. Cathodes prepared as described above may be in the form of one or more plates operatively associated with at least one or more plates of anode material, or in the form of a strip wound with a corresponding strip of anode material in a structure similar to a “jellyroll”. A preferred material for the current collector is titanium, although stainless steel, nickel, molybdenum, tantalum, niobium, cobalt, tungsten, platinum, palladium, gold, silver, copper, vanadium, aluminum, zirconium, hafnium, zinc and iron, and the like, and mixtures and alloys thereof may also be used. 
     According to the present invention the prepared cathode active material, which may or may not include binder and conductive additive materials, is contacted to a conductive current collector and then subjected to a prolonged heat treatment or annealing step. The cathode active material is preferably contacted at a pressure of about 8 tons/cm 2  to about 120 tons/cm 2 . The preferred current collector for a SVO active admixture is titanium and the annealing is at a temperature ranging from about 225° C. to about 300° C. for a heating time of about 8 hours to about 16 hours. Such a treatment protocol reduces the resistivity of the completed cathode plate to about 0.2 Ωcm or less. 
     In order to prevent internal short circuit conditions, the cathode is separated from the Group IA, IIA or IIIA anode by a suitable separator material. The separator is of electrically insulative material, and the separator material also is chemically unreactive with the anode and cathode active materials and both chemically unreactive with and insoluble in the electrolyte. In addition, the separator material has a degree of porosity sufficient to allow flow therethrough of the electrolyte during the electrochemical reaction of the cell. Illustrative separator materials include fabrics woven from fluoropolymeric fibers including polyvinylidine fluoride, polyethylenetetrafluoroethylene, and polyethylenechlorotrifluoroethylene used either alone or laminated with a fluoropolymeric microporous film, non-woven glass, polypropylene, polyethylene, glass fiber materials, ceramics, a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane commercially available under the designation ZITEX (Chemplast Inc.), a polypropylene membrane commercially available under the designation CELGARD (Celanese Plastic Company, Inc.) and a membrane commercially available under the designation DEXIGLAS (C.H. Dexter, Div., Dexter Corp.). 
     The electrochemical cell of the present invention further includes a nonaqueous, ionically conductive electrolyte which serves as a medium for migration of ions between the anode and the cathode electrodes during the electrochemical reactions of the cell. The electrochemical reaction at the electrodes involves conversion of ions which migrate from the anode to the cathode into atomic or molecular forms. Thus, nonaqueous electrolytes suitable for the present invention are substantially inert to the anode and cathode materials, and they exhibit those physical properties necessary for ionic transport, namely, low viscosity, low surface tension and wettability. 
     A suitable electrolyte has an inorganic, ionically conductive salt dissolved in a nonaqueous solvent, and more preferably, the electrolyte includes an ionizable alkali metal salt dissolved in a mixture of aprotic organic solvents comprising a low viscosity solvent and a high permittivity solvent. The ionically conductive salt serves as the vehicle for migration of the anode ions to intercalate or react with the cathode active material. In a solid cathode/electrolyte system, the preferred ion-forming alkali metal salt is similar to the alkali metal comprising the anode. Examples of salts useful with the present invention include LiPF 6 , LiAsF 6 , LiSbF 6 , LiBF 4 , LiAlCl 4 , LiNO 3 , LiGaCl 4 , LiSO 3 F, LiB(C 6 H 5 ) 4 , LiClO 4 , LiC(SO 2 CF 3 ) 3 , LiSCN, LiO 3 SCF 2 CF 3 , LiC 6 F 5 SO 3 , LiO 2 CCF 3 , LiN(SO 2 CF 3 ) 2  and LiCF 3 SO 3 , and mixtures thereof. 
     Low viscosity solvents include tetrahydrofuran (THF), methyl acetate (MA), diglyme, trigylme, tetragylme, dimethyl carbonate (DMC), 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), diethyl carbonate, diisopropylether, 1,2-diethoxyethane (DEE), 1-ethoxy,2-methoxyethane (EME), dipropyl carbonate (DPC), ethylmethyl carbonate (EMC), methylpropyl carbonate (MPC) and ethylpropyl carbonate (EPC), and mixtures thereof, and high permittivity solvents include cyclic carbonates, cyclic esters and cyclic amides such as propylene carbonate (PC), butylene carbonate (BC), ethylene carbonate (EC), acetonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethyl formamide, dimethyl acetamide, γ-valerolactone, γ-butyrolactone (GBL) and N-methyl-pyrrolidinone (NMP) and mixtures thereof. In the preferred electrochemical cell comprising the Li/SVO or the LI/CSVO couple, the preferred electrolyte is 1.0M to 1.4M LiPF 6  or LiAsF 6  or the Li/CSVO in a 50:50 mixture, by volume, of PC and DME. 
     The preferred form of the electrochemical cell of the present invention is a case-negative design wherein the anode/cathode couple is provided as a spirally-wound electrode assembly in a jellyroll configuration inserted into a conductive metal casing such that the casing, a header thereof, or both are connected to the anode current collector and serve as the negative cell terminal, as is well known to those skilled in the art. A preferred material for the casing is titanium although stainless steel, nickel and aluminum are also suitable. The casing header has a sufficient number of openings to accommodate a glass-to-metal seal terminal pin feedthrough for the cathode electrode. An additional opening is provided for electrolyte filling. After the spirally-wound electrode assembly is inserted into the casing and the casing header is secured thereto, the cell is filled with the electrolyte solution described hereinabove and hermetically sealed such as by close-welding a stainless steel plug over the fill hole, but not limited thereto. The cell of the present invention can also be constructed in a case-positive design. 
     The following examples describe the manner and process of manufacturing an electrochemical cell according to the present invention, and they set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventors of carrying out the invention, but they are not to be construed as limiting. 
     EXAMPLE I 
     Silver vanadium oxide cathode plates were fabricated by uniaxially pressing a powder mixture of, by weight, 94% SVO, 3% polytetrafluoroethylene, 1% Ketjenblack® carbon and 2% graphite loaded into a steel press form. A pressure of 6.15 tons/cm 2  was used. Six plates were pressed from the powdered depolarizer mixture having a centrally located titanium screen current collector and six plates were pressed from the powdered depolarizer mixture without the titanium current collector. Three plates with the titanium current collector and three plates without the current collector were heated at 250° C. for about 24 hours (annealed). Resistivity measurements were recorded on ambient temperature plates using a linear four probe technique. Silver paint was used to insure contact of the plates to the probes. Table 1 presents the results of the resistivity measurements. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 standard 
               
               
                   
                 resistivity, Ωcm 
                 deviation 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 SVO powdered depolarizer, no screen 
                 3.74 
                 2.26 
               
               
                 SVO powdered depolarizer, annealed 
                 10.68 
                 2.65 
               
               
                 250°, no screen 
               
               
                 SVO powdered depolarizer, w/screen 
                 0.011 
                 0.006 
               
               
                 SVO powdered depolarizer, annealed 
                 0.001 
                 0.000 
               
               
                 250°, w/screen 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     As seen in Table 1, thermal treatment of pressed powder plates without current collectors yielded increased resistivity whereas thermal treatment of plates with current collectors yielded decreased resistivity. 
     EXAMPLE II 
     Free standing silver vanadium oxide cathode sheets were calendared from an active admixture paste according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,874 to Takeuchi et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference. The free standing sheets were made by calendaring a paste mixture of, by weight, 94% SVO, 3% polytetrafluoroethylene, 2% Ketjenblack® carbon and 1% graphite. The cathode sheet material was then pressed into plates at a pressure of 6.15 tons/cm 2 . Six plates were pressed having a centrally located titanium screen current collector and six plates were pressed without the titanium current collector. Three plates with the titanium current collector and three plates without the current collector were then heated at 250° C. for about 24 hours (annealed plates). Resistivity measurements were recorded in a similar manner as described in Example I. Table 2 presents the results of the resistivity measurements. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 standard 
               
               
                   
                 resistivity, Ωcm 
                 deviation 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 SVO sheet depolarizer, no screen 
                 2.60 
                 0.18 
               
               
                 SVO sheet depolarizer, annealed 
                 10.07 
                 0.29 
               
               
                 250°, no screen 
               
               
                 SVO sheet depolarizer, w/screen 
                 0.13 
                 0.01 
               
               
                 SVO sheet depolarizer, annealed 
                 0.06 
                 0.02 
               
               
                 250°, w/screen 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     Again, as seen in Table 2, thermal treatment of pressed free standing plates without current collectors yielded increased resistivity whereas thermal treatment of plates with current collectors yielded decreased resistivity. 
     EXAMPLE III 
     Lithium cells were manufactured using SVO cathodes of 7.5 cm 2  area per plate and 0.042 cm thickness. Plate preparation was as described in Example II and included both annealed and unheated plates. Six cathode plates interleaved between a serpentine anode were welded together to make the cathode assembly for each cell. The cathodes as well as the lithium anodes were each wrapped in one layer of CELGARD 4560 polypropylene separator. The thusly made electrode assemblies were placed in stainless steel cases and hermetically sealed following introduction of an electrolyte comprising 1M LiAsF 6  in a 1:1 mixture, by volume, of propylene carbonate/dimethoxyethane. 
     Three cells from both the annealed and the unheated plate groups were discharged at 37° C. Initially, loads of 2.49 kΩ were placed on the cells for 17 hours. Following one week of open circuit storage, a pulse train consisting of four 10 second 2 A pulses (27 mA/cm 2 ) with 15 seconds rest between each pulse was applied to each cell. Pertinent data from those pulse trains was retrieved for analysis. The prepulse voltage, the minimum voltage during the first pulse of the train (p1 min), the voltage at the end of the first pulse of the train (p1 end), the minimum voltage during the fourth pulse of the train (p4 min) and the voltage delay (V-delay) were examined. Voltage delay is calculated as p1 end minus p1 min potential. The data are presented in the Table 3. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 prepulse 
                 p1 min 
                 p1 end 
                 p4 min 
                 V-delay 
               
               
                 Cell Group 
                 mV 
                 mV 
                 mV 
                 mV 
                 mV 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control (avg.) 
                 3248 
                 1443 
                 1558 
                 1691 
                 115 
               
               
                 std. dev. 
                 2 
                 41 
                 39 
                 39 
               
               
                 annealed (avg.) 
                 3252 
                 2156 
                 2310 
                 2261 
                 154 
               
               
                 std. dev. 
                 1 
                 29 
                 21 
                 20 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     It can be seen that the pulse voltage minima and the voltage at the end of the first pulse of the train were significantly higher for the cells built from annealed plates. 
     Subsequent to the above partial discharge, the cells in this example were depleted of their capacities through application of one pulse train each thirty minutes. Again, a pulse train consisted of four 10 second 2 A pulses (27 mA/cm 2 ) with 15 seconds rest between each pulse. The average capacities delivered to 2V, 1.7V and 1.5V are presented in the Table 4. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Cell Group 
                 mAh to 2 V 
                 mAh to 1.7 V 
                 mAh to 1.5 V 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control (avg.) 
                 24 
                 1334 
                 1458 
               
               
                 std. dev. 
                 1 
                 21 
                 22 
               
               
                 annealed (avg.) 
                 1217 
                 1455 
                 1561 
               
               
                 std. dev. 
                 29 
                 25 
                 26 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     From Table 4, it can be seen that the delivered capacities were significantly higher to each cutoff for the cells built from annealed plates. Representative curves of the thusly pulse discharged cells are shown in FIG.  1 . In particular, curve  10  was constructed from the open circuit voltage of a representative control cell and curve  12  was constructed from the p4 minima of that cell during pulse discharge. Curve  14  was constructed from the open circuit voltage of a representative present invention cell constructed according to this example and curve  16  was constructed from the p4 minima of that cell during pulse discharge. 
     The open circuit voltages recorded during discharge were not significantly different between the two groups. Depressed voltages during pulse discharge are especially evident at beginning of life in the discharge curves of the control cells. That phenomenon is not as severe in the cells built having annealed cathode plates according to the present invention. The annealed plate cells also show less polarization throughout discharge, as evidenced by the higher pulse minima curves of FIG.  1  and the higher delivered capacities to the various designated voltage cutoffs. 
     EXAMPLE IV 
     Ten Li/SVO cells were manufactured in a multiplate construction similar to that described in Example III. Various ones of the cells had annealed cathode plates and unheated cathode plates. 
     A constant resistive load of 10.5 kΩ was applied to all six cells for 15 hours during an initial predischarge burn-in period. The predischarge period is referred to as burn-in and depleted the cells of approximately 1% of their theoretical capacity. Following burn-in, the cells were placed on open circuit storage for 7 days and then subjected to acceptance pulse testing consisting of four 10 second 2 A pulses (27 mA/cm 2 ) with a 15 second rest between each pulse. One such train was applied every 39 days. This type of discharge is termed in-house as 10 month accelerated discharge data (ADD). 
     FIG. 2 is a graph constructed from the average pulse discharge readings of the control cells and the annealed cells. Specifically, curve  20  was constructed from the average open circuit voltage of the prior art cells in the example, curve  22  was constructed from the average p1 minimum, curve  24  from the average p1 end voltage and curve  26  from the average p4 minimum voltage during pulse discharge. The control discharge curves end at pulse train  5  because the pulse minima fell below the end-of-life cutoff. In contrast, curve  30  was constructed from the average open circuit voltage of the present invention cells in this example, curve  32  was constructed from the average p1 minima, curve  34  from the average p1 end voltage and curve  36  from the average p4 minima voltage during pulse discharge. The cells with the heat treated multiplate construction showed improved performance relative to the multiplate control cells in terms of pulse voltage minima. 
     Additionally, heat dissipation of the cells was measured prior to application of the pulse trains. A plot of heat dissipation versus depth of discharge is shown in FIG. 3, wherein curves  40 ,  42  and  44  were constructed from three prior art cells and curves  46 ,  48  and  50  were constructed from three present invention cells. FIG. 3A is a quantification of the data shown in FIG. 3 based on an average of three cells from each of the prior art group and the present invention group. Curve  52  is a plot of the average heat dissipated by the present invention cells as a percent of the average heat dissipated by the control cells. The cells with the heat treated cathodes dissipated much less heat at beginning of life than the control cells, an unexpected result. 
     EXAMPLE V 
     Ten Li/SVO cells were manufactured in a jellyroll configuration containing cathode sheets made in a manner similar to that described in Example III. Various ones of the cells had annealed cathode sheets and unheated cathode sheets. Specifically, cells made according to the present invention had cathodes sheets that were heat treated prior to winding into the jellyroll configuration. 
     The cells were then burned-in followed by discharge under an accelerated pulse discharge regime. Burn-in was accomplished via discharge under a 3.57 kΩ load for 15 hours followed by 7 days rest and application of one pulse train. The pulse train comprised four 10 second 1.3 A pulses with 15 seconds rest between each pulse. Accelerated pulse discharge consisted of applying one such train each 30 minutes. Burn-in and accelerated pulse summaries are provided in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. 
     FIGS. 4 and 5 are graphs constructed from the burn-in and accelerated pulse discharge data of representative ones of the prior art and present invention cells. In particular, curve  60  was constructed from the prepulse voltage of one of the prior art cells, curve  62  was constructed from the p1 minima of that cell and curve  64  was constructed from the p4 minima. In contrast, curve  70  was constructed from the prepulse voltage of one of the present invention annealed cells, curve  72  was constructed from the p1 minima of that cell and curve  74  was constructed from the p4 minima. 
     The average discharge readings for the pre-pulse, p1 minimum, p1 end and p4 minimum potentials during burn-in and the delivered capacity to various voltage cut-offs during acceptance pulse testing are summarized in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 prepulse 
                 p1 min 
                 p1 end 
                 p4 min 
               
               
                 Burn-in 
                 mV 
                 mV 
                 mV 
                 mV 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 3246 
                 2526 
                 2528 
                 2501 
               
               
                 cells 
                 std. dev. 
                 1 
                 30 
                 30 
                 25 
               
               
                 annealed 
                 avg. 
                 3254 
                 1831 
                 2147 
                 2182 
               
               
                 cells 
                 std. dev. 
                 1 
                 130 
                 130 
                 108 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Accelerated Pulse Test 
                 mAh to 2 V 
                 mAh to 1.7 V 
                 mAh to 1.5 V 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 1018 
                 1233 
                 1305 
               
               
                 cells 
                 std. dev. 
                 132 
                 14 
                 8 
               
               
                 annealed 
                 avg. 
                 1102 
                 1266 
                 1330 
               
               
                 cells 
                 std. dev. 
                 11 
                 11 
                 11 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     EXAMPLE VI 
     In order to determine if heat treating (annealing) the individual active and non-active components of a SVO depolarizer mixture prior to making the mixture would offer similar improvements to those shown in the above examples for completed and heat treated cathode plates fabricated into multiplate cells and cathode sheets fabricated into jellyroll cells, various combinations of annealed and unheated silver vanadium oxide and carbonaceous conductor depolarizer mixtures were tested. Specifically, four different depolarizer mixtures were provided including: 
     1) Heat treated SVO, heat treated Ketjenblack® carbon and heat treated graphite were mixed together. 
     2) Heat treated SVO and as-received Ketjenblack® carbon and as-received graphite were mixed together. 
     3) Heat treated Ketjenblack® carbon and as-made SVO and as-received graphite were mixed together. 
     4) Heat treated graphite and as-made SVO and as-received Ketjenblack® carbon were mixed together. 
     In all cases, the tested component was heated at about 225° C. for about 16 hours. A control group of cells was fabricated wherein none of the components was heat treated nor were the completed plates heat treated. Both multiplate and jellyroll cells were fabricated from the various combinations of annealed and unannealed active and non-active cathode components. The cells each had a lithium anode activated with an electrolyte of 1.0M LiAsF 6  in a 50:50 mixture of, by volume, propylene carbonate and 1,2-dimethoxyethane. 
     A constant resistance load of 3.57 kΩ was applied to all of the cells. For the multiplate cell design, the load was applied for 17 hours and for the jellyroll design, the load was applied for 15 hours during an initial predischarge burn-in period. The acceptance pulse train consisted of four 10 second pulses with a 15 second rest between each pulse. The cells were subjected to an acceptance pulse train one week after the constant resistance load was removed. For the multiplate cell design, the pulse amplitude was 1.74 A (23 mA/cm 2 ) and for the jellyroll design, the pulse amplitude was 1.30 A (23 mA/cm 2 ). One train was applied each 30 minutes. The respective burn-in and acceptance pulse tests for the multiple cell design are set forth in Tables 7 and 8 and for the jellyroll cell design are set forth in Tables 9 and 10. 
     Furthermore, FIG. 6 was constructed from a representative one of the cells containing mixture 1) wherein curve  80  was constructed from the prepulse voltage and curves  82 ,  84  and  86  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, p1 end voltage, and the p4 min. voltage, respectively. FIG. 7 was constructed from a representative one of the cells containing mixture 2) wherein curve  90  was constructed from the prepulse voltage and curves  92 ,  94  and  96  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, p1 end voltage and the p4 min. voltage, respectively. FIG. 8 was constructed from a representative one of the cells containing mixture 3) wherein curve  100  was constructed from the prepulse voltage and curves  102 ,  104  and  106  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, the p1 end voltage and the p4 min. voltage, respectively. FIG. 9 was constructed from a representative one of the cells containing mixture 4) wherein curve  110  was constructed from the prepulse voltage and curves  112 ,  114  and  116  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, the p1 end voltage and the p4 min. voltage, respectively. FIG. 10 was constructed from a representative one of the control cells wherein curve  120  was constructed from the prepulse voltage and curves  122 ,  124  and  126  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, the p1 end voltage, and the p4 min. voltage of that cell, respectively. 
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 prepulse 
                 p1 min 
                 p1 end 
                 p4 min 
               
               
                 Burn-in 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 3.24 
                 2.35 
                 2.35 
                 2.29 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 0.00 
                 0.18 
                 0.18 
                 0.20 
               
               
                 Ketjenblack ® 
                 avg. 
                 3.25 
                 2.39 
                 2.39 
                 2.33 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std. dev. 
                 0.00 
                 0.12 
                 0.12 
                 0.14 
               
               
                 graphite 
                 avg. 
                 3.24 
                 2.42 
                 2.45 
                 2.39 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std. dev. 
                 0.00 
                 0.03 
                 0.02 
                 0.02 
               
               
                 SVO 
                 avg. 
                 3.25 
                 2.36 
                 2.39 
                 2.35 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std. dev. 
                 0.00 
                 0.04 
                 0.04 
                 0.03 
               
               
                 all treated 
                 avg. 
                 3.25 
                 2.29 
                 2.30 
                 2.29 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 0.00 
                 0.02 
                 0.03 
                 0.02 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 mAh to 
                 mAh to 
                 mAh to 
               
               
                 Acceptance Pulse Test 
                 2 V 
                 1.7 V 
                 1.5 V 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 799 
                 976 
                 1078 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 12 
                 14 
                 17 
               
               
                 Ketjenblack ® treated 
                 avg. 
                 684 
                 863 
                 960 
               
               
                 all cells 
                 std. dev. 
                 301 
                 264 
                 264 
               
               
                 Ketjenblack ® treated 
                 avg. 
                 834 
                 995 
                 1092 
               
               
                 outlier gone 
                 std. dev. 
                 5 
                 6 
                 6 
               
               
                 graphite 
                 avg. 
                 852 
                 1019 
                 1116 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std. dev. 
                 18 
                 20 
                 21 
               
               
                 SVO treated 
                 avg. 
                 863 
                 1020 
                 1111 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 13 
                 12 
                 12 
               
               
                 all treated 
                 avg. 
                 830 
                 993 
                 1085 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 19 
                 14 
                 13 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 9 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 prepulse 
                 p1 min 
                 p1 end 
                 p4 min 
               
               
                 Burn-in 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
                 (volts) 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Ketjenblack ® 
                 avg. 
                 3.26 
                 2.53 
                 2.53 
                 2.51 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std dev 
                 0.00 
                 0.03 
                 0.03 
                 0.03 
               
               
                 graphite 
                 avg. 
                 3.26 
                 2.53 
                 2.53 
                 2.50 
               
               
                 treated 
                 std dev 
                 0.00 
                 0.04 
                 0.04 
                 0.04 
               
               
                 SVO treated 
                 avg. 
                 3.26 
                 2.53 
                 2.53 
                 2.51 
               
               
                   
                 std dev 
                 0.00 
                 0.06 
                 0.06 
                 0.06 
               
               
                 all treated 
                 avg. 
                 3.26 
                 2.49 
                 2.49 
                 2.48 
               
               
                   
                 std dev 
                 0.00 
                 0.06 
                 0.06 
                 0.05 
               
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 3.26 
                 2.57 
                 2.57 
                 2.54 
               
               
                   
                 std dev 
                 0.00 
                 0.07 
                 0.07 
                 0.07 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     
       
         
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 10 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 mAh to 
                 mAh to 
                 mAh to 
               
               
                 Acceptance Pulse Test 
                 2 V 
                 1.7 V 
                 1.5 V 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 Ketjenblack ® treated 
                 avg. 
                 933 
                 1103 
                 1173 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 17 
                 10 
                 10 
               
               
                 graphite treated 
                 avg. 
                 963 
                 1132 
                 1204 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 13 
                 15 
                 15 
               
               
                 SVO treated 
                 avg. 
                 945 
                 1105 
                 1169 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 17 
                 20 
                 21 
               
               
                 all treated 
                 avg. 
                 970 
                 1133 
                 1197 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 10 
                 12 
                 12 
               
               
                 control 
                 avg. 
                 944 
                 1109 
                 1176 
               
               
                   
                 std. dev. 
                 9 
                 10 
                 10 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
     As shown in Tables 7 to 10, discharge performance improvement is not realized if any of the individual depolarizer components is heat treated prior to making a mix. These data support the necessity of heat treating the entire pressed cathode plate to provide discharge improvements according to the present invention. This is applicable to both multiplate and jellyroll electrode configurations. 
     EXAMPLE VII 
     In order to determine if forming the cathode structure from a free standing sheet according to the previously referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,874 to Takeuchi et al. in comparison to a pressed powder technique resulted in significant differences in the discharge performance of the present invention cells, six multiplate cells containing the latter type of cathode plates were constructed. The plates were built from a dry granular admixture of, by weight, 94% svo active material, 3% PTFE binder material, 2% Ketjenblack® carbon and 1% graphite loaded into a hydraulic press. The admixture was pressed onto both sides of an intermediate screen to form the cathode plates. In all other respects, the cells were constructed in a similar manner as those described in Example II. 
     Three cells from both the annealed and the unheated plate groups were discharged at 37° C. The test comprised discharging the cells under a 15.5 kΩ load interrupted by a pulse train applied every 39 days. the pulse train consisted of four 10 second 1.74 A pulses (19 mA/cm 2 ) with 15 second rests between each pulse. 
     FIG. 11 was constructed from the pertinent data collected during pulse discharge of the cells during pulse trains 1 to 5. Particularly, curve  130  was constructed from the prepulse voltage of a representative one of the unheated, control cells, and curves  132 ,  134  and  136  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, the p1 end voltage and the p4 min. voltage, respectively, for pulse trains 1 to 5. In contrast, curve  140  was constructed from the prepulse voltage of a representative one of the annealed cells, and curves  142 ,  144  and  146  were constructed from the p1 min. voltage, the p1 end voltage and the p4 min. voltage, respectively, for pulse trains 1 to 5. 
     Improved discharge performance is again evident in the annealed protocol. Specifically, diminished voltage delay is realized in the fifth train of the cells having the heat treated pressed powder cathode fabricated into a multiplate design. 
     It is appreciated that various modifications to the inventive concepts described herein may be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the hereinafter appended claims.