Abstract:
An improved closed cell polymer foam and foaming agent involving the use of a hydrogen-containing halocarbon blowing agent (e.g., HCFC-22) in combination with an effective amount of a hydrogen bond forming blocking agent (e.g., organic ether, ester or ketone). The presence of the blocking agent is shown to significantly reduce the escape of blowing agent from and entry of air into the foam resulting in low thermal conductivity over a longer period of time and improved thermal insulation value.

Description:
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/577,045, filed Aug. 28, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/500,051, filed Mar. 23, 1990, now abandoned. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention relates to improved polymer foams and foaming agents by the use of blocking agents. More specifically, the invention relates to combinations of a hydrogen bond forming blocking agent and a hydrogen-containing halocarbon and a method of using the same in closed cell polymer foams to reduce permeation of air and/or hydrohalocarbon, thereby maintaining low thermal conductivity and improved thermal insulation value of the foam. 
     2. Description of Related Art, including Information Disclosed under §§1.97-1.99 
     It is generally known and an accepted commercial practice to add a blowing agent to various polymeric materials during fabrication such as to produce a cellular (expanded foam) material. Typically, the blowing agent can be either a reactive solid or liquid that evolves a gas, a liquid that vaporizes, or a compressed gas that expands during final fabrication producing the desired polymeric foam. Such foams are categorically either closed cell (i.e., non-porous, continuous polymer phase with discontinuous gas phase dispersed therein) or open cell (porous) foams which are advantageously employed in various end use applications and exhibit various advantages associated with the particular type of foam produced. In describing the closed cell foam as involving a discontinuous gas phase, it should be appreciated that this description is an over simplification. In reality the gas phase is dissolved in the polymer phase and there will be a finite substantial presence of gas (blowing agent) in the polymer. Furthermore and as generally known in the art, the cell gas composition of the foam at the moment of manufacture does not necessarily correspond to the equilibrium gas composition after aging or sustained use. Thus, the gas in a closed cell foam frequently exhibits compositional changes as the foam ages leading to such known phenomenon as increase in thermal conductivity or loss of insulation value. 
     Closed cell foams are usually employed for their reduced thermal conductivity or improved thermal insulation properties. Historically, insulating polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foams have been made using trichlorofluoromethane, CCl 3  F (CFC-11), as the blowing agent. Similarly, insulating phenolic foam is known to be made from phenol-formaldehyde resins (typically via an intermediate resole mixture involving a phenol-formaldehyde oligomer condensate) using blends of 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, CCl 2  FCClF 2  (CFC-113), and CFC-11 as the blowing agent. Also, insulating thermoplastic foam such as polystyrene foam is commonly manufactured using dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl 2  F 2  (CFC-12), as the blowing agent. 
     The use of a chlorofluorocarbon as the preferred commercial expansion or blowing agent in insulating foam applications is in part based on the resulting k-factor (i.e., the rate of transfer of heat energy by conduction through one square foot of one inch thick homogenous material in one hour where there is a difference of one degree Fahrenheit perpendicularly across the two surfaces of the material) associated with the foam produced. Thus, it is generally known and accepted that a chlorofluorocarbon gaseous phase within the closed cell is a superior thermal barrier relative to other inexpensive gases such as air or carbon dioxide. Conversely, the natural intrusion of air into the foam over time and to a lesser extent the escape of the chlorofluorocarbon from the cell is deleterious to the desired low thermal conductivity and high insulative value of the foams. Also, the escape of certain chlorofluorocarbons to the atmosphere is now recognized as potentially contributing to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer and contributing to the global warming phenomenon. In view of the environmental concerns with respect to the presently used chlorofluorocarbon blowing agents, it is now generally accepted that it would be more desirable to use hydrochlorofluorocarbons or hydrofluorocarbons rather than the chlorofluorocarbons. Consequently, the need for a method or way of inhibiting the permeation of air and blowing agent through the polymer phase of the polymeric foam exists and hopefully any such solution to the problem would be effective in inhibiting the permeation of the proposed alternative halocarbons. 
     Historically, various methods and compositions have been proposed, with varying degree of success, to alleviate and/or control problems associated with permeation of gases into and out of polymeric foams. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,361 the problem of shrinkage (lack of dimensional stability) associated with using any blowing agent other than 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane in the manufacture of foamed polyethylene is addressed. In this reference, a stability control agent is used in either a homopolymer or copolymer of ethylene wherein the blowing agent is isobutane or isobutane mixed with another hydrocarbon or a chlorocarbon, fluorocarbon or chlorofluorocarbon. The stability control agent is either partial esters of long chain fatty acids with polyols, higher alkyl amines, fatty acid amides, olefinically unsaturated carboxylic acid copolymers, or polystyrene. This reference also describes other prior art and is included by reference for such purpose. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 4,243,717 a Fischer-Tropsch wax is added to expanded polystyrene beads to produce a stable cell structure in the foam, without specific reference to the permeation of blowing agent or air. In Canadian Patent 990,900 the use of a barrier material or blocking agent is disclosed to alleviate the problem of gas migration through the cell wall specifically at the time of foaming. The particular problem addressed in this Canadian patent is the rupture and total collapse of the cell walls that frequently occur in the manufacture of closed cell polyethylene foam. This problem is attributed to the fact that the cell walls for such foams are permeable to the rapidly expanding gas under the influence of the heat liberated by the exothermic polymer crystallization. The specific solution disclosed in this reference is to use a blend of polyethylene and polypropylene along with a barrier resin such as an elastomer containing polystyrene or acrylic resin which are intended to contribute high melt strength to the cell wall at the foaming temperature. An inert nucleant is also employed along with at least two gaseous propellants of substantially different vapor pressures. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,763 the use of at least 2 percent carbon black as a filler uniformly dispersed in a polymeric foam is shown to reduce the aged k-factor of the foam to below the aged k-factor of the corresponding unfilled foam. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention provides a method of preventing or slowing down both the rate of intrusion or permeation of air into the closed cells of a polymeric foam as well as preventing or slowing down the escape of the blowing agent by permeation or migration out of the polymer foam cells. Thus, according to the present invention the effective rate of permeation of air and/or hydrohalocarbon across the polymeric phase of the foam is substantially reduced by virtue of the presence of a blocking agent. Further according to the present invention a blocking agent capable of hydrogen bond formation with the hydrogen-containing halocarbon is incorporated into the polymeric foam and thus tends to form hydrogen bonds with the blowing agent. This in turn dramatically reduces the permeation rate of the hydrogen-containing blowing agent retaining it in the foam. The presence of the blocking agent also functions to reduce entry of air into the polymer foam. By reducing the entry of air into insulating foam and simultaneously reducing the permeation of blowing agents out of insulating foam, the blocking agents according to the present invention produce foams which better maintain their insulating characteristics relative to foams made without these hydrogen bond forming agents. 
     Thus, the present invention provides in a closed cell thermoplastic or thermoset polymer foam characterized by a continuous polymeric phase and a discontinuous gaseous phase, the improvement comprising: (a) a gaseous phase comprising at least one hydrogen-containing halocarbon; and (b) an effective amount of a hydrogen bond forming blocking agent. Preferably the hydrogen bond forming blocking agent is an organic ether, ester or ketone and is preferably present in the range of from about 0.1 to about 20 weight percent based on the total weight of foam. 
     Since the blocking agent according to the present invention can often be conveniently incorporated, marketed and used in combination with the blowing agent, the present invention further provides an improved thermoplastic or thermoset polymer foaming composition comprising: 
     (a) a hydrogen-containing halocarbon; and 
     (b) an effective amount of a hydrogen bond forming blocking agent. 
     The improved method according to the present invention involves, in a method of manufacturing an expanded polymeric foam wherein a blowing agent expands as the polymeric phase solidifies, the specific improvement comprising the steps of: 
     (a) selecting a hydrogen-containing halocarbon as the blowing agent; and 
     (b) adding an effective amount a hydrogen bond forming blocking agent to reduce the permeation of air into the foam or slow down the escape of blowing agent from of the foam. 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide a blocking agent that when incorporated into a polymeric foam will reduce or prevent the intrusion of air into the foam and/or the permeation or escape of blowing agent from the foam. It is a further object of the present invention to provide such a blocking agent that is particularly useful with the hydrogen-containing chlorofluorocarbons and hydrogen-containing fluorocarbons (i.e., the HCFCs and HFCs) in that the blocking agent will hydrogen bond with the hydrohalomethanes and hydrohaloethanes, thus significantly reducing their rate of permeation and escape from a closed cell polymeric foam. It is an associated object of the present invention to provide insulating foam containing a blocking agent and a method of manufacturing the same that exhibits preservation of the insulating properties over longer periods of times relative to the absence of the blocking agent. Fulfillment of these objects and the presence and fulfillment of additional objects will be apparent upon complete reading of the specification and the claims. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     Polymer foams typically involve a continuous or at least a contiguous phase in a cellular structure. This cellular structure can be either flexible or rigid and is categorically either an open cell structure (i.e., the individual cells are ruptured or open producing a soft, porous &#34;sponge&#34; foam which contains no blowing agent gas) or a closed cell structure (i.e., the individual cells contain blowing agent gas surrounded by polymeric sidewalls with minimum cell-to-cell gas flow). Thermally insulating foams are closed cell structures containing a blowing agent gas (i.e., a gas formed in situ during the foam manufacturing process). Preferably the blowing agent gas should have a low vapor thermal conductivity (VTC) so as to minimize conduction of heat through the insulating foam. Thus, the vapor thermal conductivities for halocarbons such as CFC-11, CFC-12 and hydrochlorodifluoromethane, CHClF 2  (HCFC-22), at 25° C. (i.e., 45.1, 55.7 and 65.9 Btu.ft -1 .hr -1 .°F. -1  ×10 4 , respectively) compare favorably to the VTC for air at 25° C. (i.e., 150.5 Btu.ft -1 .hr -1 .°F. -1  ×10 4 ). From these data, it can readily be seen that the presence of a halocarbon blowing agent is required for optimum thermal insulation properties with both thermoplastic and thermoset foams. 
     A problem with hydrogen-containing alternative blowing agent HCFC-22 is its rapid migration from thermoplastic foams. For example, in the case of one grade of polystyrene, the permeation rate at 25° C. for CFC-12 vs. HCFC-22 was 4.2×10 -9  g/hr vs. 6.5×10 -8  g/hr (i.e., HCFC-22 diffused 15.5 times faster than CFC-12). Without some way to prevent or slow down the rate of HCFC-22 permeation from polystyrene foam, this blowing agent is unacceptable for producing good insulation foam, using this particular grade of polystyrene. 
     HCFC-22 is also known to diffuse rapidly from some polyurethane/polyisocyanurate foam formulations. Techniques for slowing/preventing this blowing agent migration are required if the halocarbon is to be useful in preparing these thermoset insulating foams. 
     In addition to the undesirable degradation of foam insulation value caused by permeation losses of blowing agent, the effect of air entry from the atmosphere into the foam cells is at least equally significant. As air enters the foam cells, the vapor thermal conductivity of the cell gas increases and the insulation value drops. 
     The blocking agents of this invention unexpectedly function to reduce air entry into foams and/or to reduce the permeation of hydrogen-containing blowing agents such as HCFC-22 from the foam cells, thereby producing more effective/economical insulation foams. 
     For the purposes of the present invention, the term &#34;blocking agent&#34; is used herein to denote hydrogen bond forming compounds which contain ether, ester or ketone groups or the like. These hydrogen bond forming compounds can bond or associate with hydrogen-containing halocarbon blowing agents such as HCFC-22 and thereby reduce their rates of permeation from the foam. 
     Unexpectedly, HCFC-22, difluoromethane (CH 2  F 2 , HFC-32), 1,1,1-trifluoro-2,2-dichloroethane (CHCl 2  CF 3 , HCFC-123), 1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2-dichloroethane (CHClFCClF 2 , HCFC-123a), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoro-2-chloroethane (CHClFCF 3 , HCFC-124), pentafluoroethane (CHF 2  CF 3 , HFC-125), 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (CHF 2  CHF 2 , HFC-134), and 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (CH 2  FCF 3 , HFC-134a) have been observed to associate or hydrogen bond with compounds containing ether, ester or ketone groups. Glycols and other polyhydroxy compounds tend to form intra- or inter-molecular hydrogen bonds with themselves and thus do not associate strongly with HCFC-22. HCFC-22, with hydrogen bonding esters, ketones or ethers, exhibits dramatically reduced vapor pressure as a result of the association. Furthermore, when these hydrogen bonding compounds are present in thermoplastic polymers such as polystyrene, the permeation of HCFC-22 is reduced/slowed as the result of the mutual association which occurs between these compounds. The hydrogen bond forming agents additionally function to improve the solubility of blowing agents such as HFC-134a in thermoplastic polymers such as polystyrene. 
     Also, the mutual solubility of HCFC-22 and HCFC-123 or the like with several hydrogen bond forming compounds further provides evidence of an unexpected association between these materials. CFC-12 does not share this unexpected solubility characteristic. Because of the solubility of many of the hydrogen bond forming compounds in HCFC-22, these compounds are suitable for dissolving in HCFC-22 and, thus, can be made commercially available in this convenient form. 
     For purposes of the present invention and as previously mentioned, the blocking agent can broadly be any compound that contains either an ether, ester or ketone group or combinations of the same and is capable of hydrogen bonding or the equivalent strong association or complexing with hydrogen-containing halocarbons. For example, but not by way of limitation, the following table lists examples of ether, ester or ketone groups containing compounds which associate or hydrogen bond with hydrogen-containing halocarbons such as HCFC-22. 
     HYDROGEN BONDING AGENTS 
     (1) Polyethylene oxide polymers 
     (2) Ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers 
     (3) Polypropylene oxide polymers 
     (4) Polyethylene glycol mono- and dioleates 
     (5) Polyethylene glycol monostearates 
     (6) Alkylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanols 
     (7) Polyethylene oxide sorbitan monostearates and tristearates 
     (8) Polyethylene oxide fatty acid amides 
     (9) Primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates 
     (10) Glyme, diglyme, triglyme and tetraglyme 
     (11) Mono-, di- and tripropylene glycol methyl ethers and ether acetates 
     (12) Dimethyl adipate, succinate and glutarate 
     (13) Ethylene oxide/propylene oxide adducts with a sucrose 
     (14) Ketones and polyketone polymers. 
     The use of hydrogen-containing blowing agents such as HCFC-22 with ether, ester or ketone hydrogen bond forming compounds in polymer foams does not preclude the simultaneous incorporation of blowing agents such as 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane (CCl 2  FCH 3 , HCFC-141b), 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane (CClF2CH 3 , HCFC-142b), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (CF 3  CH 3 , HFC-143a), 1,2-difluoroethane (CH 2  FCH 2  F, HFC-152), and 1,1,-difluoroethane (CHF 2  CH 3 , HFC-152a) which do not tend to form strong hydrogen bonds. It should be further appreciated that various CFCs may also be present as a component of a blowing agent mixture useful according to the present invention and that the present invention is applicable when CO 2 , hydrocarbons or methyl formate are components of the blowing agent gas. Similarly, various additives such as stabilizers, dyes, fillers, and the like can be present in the blowing agent. 
     In addition to reducing the entry of air into and/or the migration of hydrogen-containing blowing agents such as HCFC-22 from thermoplastic foams, the hydrogen bond forming agents may provide other functions to the foam manufacturing process. For example, compounds such as the polyethylene oxide polymers may provide lubricity and thereby increase the extrusion throughput or production rate. Furthermore, these compounds are contemplated as potentially useful as polymer plasticizers and may contribute advantageously to other properties. 
     The hydrogen bond forming agents of this invention are suitable for use with thermoplastics such as polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, and the like to prevent loss of hydrogen-containing blowing agents; however, they can also be used with thermoset polymer foams such as polyurethane, polyisocyanurate, and phenolic resin foams. Since these hydrogen bond forming agents associate with blowing agents such as HCFC-22, they will function to reduce/prevent permeation of the blowing agent in any compatible polymer foam system. Furthermore, these hydrogen bond forming agents will function in the presence of other additives normally used in polymer foams, such as stabilizers, dyes, fillers, and the like. 
     The blowing agent concentration used to prepare most conventional thermoplastic and thermoset polymer foams is generally in the range of about 5 weight percent to about 30 weight percent (based on total weight of the foam). To reduce migration of hydrogen-containing blowing agents such as HCFC-22, the effective use concentration of hydrogen bond forming agent is at least about 0.1 weight percent and preferably from about 1.0 to 20 weight percent (based on total formulation weight), most preferably about 0.5 weight percent to about 10 weight percent. Typically, the improved polymer foaming composition will contain from 1 to 100 parts by weight hydrogen bond forming blocking agent for every 100 parts of hydrogen-containing halocarbon blowing agent. 
     The actual method by which the blocking agent according to the present invention is to be incorporated into the closed cell foam can vary according to the specific application and composition being employed. In the broadest sense, the blocking agent can be treated as any other foam additive as generally known in the art. As previously stated, the blocking agent in certain applications imparts beneficial effects to the polymer phase in addition to reducing permeability and in such cases the blocking agent can be added to the polymer. Since the blocking agent is categorically a hydrogen bond forming compound, it may be advantageously added to the blowing agent or preblended into the polymer (e.g., polystyrene) prior to extrusion or other method of fabrication. In the case of thermoset foams (e.g., polyurethane/polyisocyanurate foams) the hydrogen bond forming agents can be added to the foam in the isocyanate (A-side) or the polyol (B-side) or added with the blowing agent at the mixing head where the A-side and B-side are combined (i.e., third-streamed). For purposes of the present invention the term &#34;A-side&#34; is used to specify the isocyanate containing component of a conventional two component precursor foam system. The term &#34;B-side&#34; is used to specify the polyol containing component. It should be appreciated that this nomenclature may be reversed particularly in certain European literature. It should be further appreciated that these precursor components to foams typically contain other ingredients, additives, agents, diluent and the like all as generally known in the art. Thus for example, but not by way of limitation, the B-side will typically contain, in addition to the polyol, a surfactant, a catalyst and one or more blowing agents. If the hydrogen bond forming agent used contains free hydroxyl groups, this must be taken into account when calculating the hydroxyl equivalent for the B-side system. In the case where the blocking agent is preferentially more soluble in one of the foam components, it is preferably added to that component. For example, addition of the blocking agent to the polyol component of two-component thermoset resin is preferred. Of course, the addition to more than one component or either component is also contemplated. In the case of phenolic foams, the hydrogen bond forming agents can be added to the foam by preblending into the resole or added separately at the mixing head prior to the foam laydown. The most preferred method of adding the blocking agent is to mix it with the blowing agent and as such the admixture of HCFC or HFC and blocking agent is contemplated as being a commercially attractive product, per se. Again, since the blocking agent is categorically a hydrogen bond forming compound, in the case of the thermoset foams (e.g., polyurethane/polyisocyanurate foams) not only can a polyol be added as the blocking agent but the polyol (B-side) can be viewed as the blocking agent. Thus, as previously stated if the hydrogen bond forming agent used contains free hydroxyl groups they must be taken into account when calculating the hydroxyl equivalent for the B-side system. Conversely, the ether and ester groups of the polyol found in the B-side should also be view as contributing as the hydrogen bond forming blocking agent. As such, in cases where there are ether and/or ester groups present in the polyol, the polyol should be considered as a blocking agent. 
    
    
     The following examples are presented to further illustrate specific critical properties of various specific embodiments of the present invention, including vapor pressure, boiling point and permeation data, as well as similar properties, for comparison purposes, of systems and compositions outside the scope of the invention. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     The solubilities of several representative hydrogen bond forming agents in HCFC-22 were determined for 10 wt % solutions at ambient temperature (approximately 70° F.). The solutions were prepared by combining the hydrogen bond forming agents with HCFC-22 in 4 oz. plastic-coated pressure bottles. Solubility was determined by visual examination. Table I lists ten hydrogen bond forming compounds which are soluble to &gt;10 wt. % in HCFC-22. These hydrogen bond forming agents are soluble in HCFC-22, HCFC-123 and HCFC-123a because of their bonding or association; whereas, they are generally insoluble in CFC-12. The hydrogen bond forming agents are also soluble in HCFC-141b. 
     Table I 
     Hydrogen Bonding Agent Solubility in HCFC-22 
     The following hydrogen bonding agents are soluble at ambient temperature in HCFC-22 to &gt;10 wt. %.: 
     Hydrogen Bonding Agents* 
     &#34;PLURONIC&#34; F-108 
     &#34;CARBOWAX&#34; 3350 
     &#34;WITCONOL&#34; H35A 
     &#34;TRITON&#34; X-67 
     Polypropylene Glycol 2025 
     &#34;ETHOFAT&#34; 0/20 
     &#34;ETHOMID&#34; HT/60 
     &#34;TERGITOL&#34; 15-S-20 
     &#34;ETHOX&#34; DO-9 
     &#34;TERGITOL&#34; NP-40 
    
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Vapor pressure data were obtained for mixtures of CFC-12 and HCFC-22, respectively, with hydrogen bonding agents. In these tests, 30 grams of blowing agent was combined with 70 grams of hydrogen bond forming agent in a 4 oz. plastic-coated pressure bottles. After thermostatting the bottles at 70° F., the vapor pressures were determined using a pressure gauge accurate to 0.1 psi. Although HCFC-22 by itself has considerably higher vapor pressure at 70° F. than CFC-12 (121.4 psig vs. 70.2 psig), the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen bond forming agents and HCFC-22 resulted in dramatic vapor pressure depressions to values much lower than for CFC-12. The vapor pressure data are summarized in Table II. 
     Boiling point data were obtained for a 30/70 blend of HCFC-123/DBE. The data in Table IIA show an elevation in boiling point (relative to the value calculated from Raoult&#39;s Law) of 17° C. as the result of the association or hydrogen bonding which occurs between these materials. Similar boiling point elevations were observed for 30/70 blends of HCFC-123/DPM and HCFC-123/DPMA. 
     Table IIB shows vapor pressure data for HFC-32, HCFC-124, HFC-125, HFC-134 and HFC-134a with DBE, acetone, and 2-pentanone. Each hydrogen bond forming agent depresses the vapor pressure of the blowing agents. 
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________Effect of Hydrogen Bonding Agentson Vapor Pressure of HCFC-22        Blowing               Vapor Pressure        Agent  at 70° F., psigBonding Agent  Wt. %    CFC-12     HCFC-22______________________________________None           100.0    70.2       121.4&#34;CARBOWAX&#34; 3350          30.0     70.2       57.2&#34;PLURONIC&#34; F-108          30.0     70.2       55.5&#34;WITCONOL&#34; H35A          15.0     44.0       20.0          30.0     70.2       38.0(*)&#34;TRITON&#34; X-67  15.0     70.2       29.5          30.0     70.2       41.0&#34;TWEEN&#34; 61     30.0     70.2       70.5Polypropylene Glycol          30.0     49.2(*)    39.3(*)2025&#34;ETHOFAT&#34; 0/20 30.0     57.5(*)    35.0(*)&#34;ETHOMID&#34; HT/60          15.0     70.2       18.5          30.0     70.2       29.0&#34;CARBOWAX&#34; 8000          30.0     70.2       61.0Polyethylene Glycol          30.0     70.2       55.2Cpd 20M&#34;POLYOX&#34; WSRN-10          30.0     70.2       56.5&#34;TERGITOL&#34; 15-S-20          15.0     70.2       15.0          30.0     70.2       26.5(*)&#34;TERGITOL&#34; 24-L-92          30.0     59.2(*)    31.0(*)&#34;TERGITOL&#34; NP-40          30.0     70.2       44.0Polypropylene Glycol          30.0     54.0(*)    37.0(*)425                     (112.5 at  (93.0 at                   130° F.)                              130° F.)&#34;PLURACOL&#34; 975 15.0     46.0(*)    17.0(*)                   (110.0 at  (49.0 at                   130° F.)                              130° F.)          30.0     70.2       50.5(*)                   (2 phases)&#34;ETHOX&#34; DO-9   30.0     53.7(*)    39.5(*)Diglyme        30.0     26.0(*)    7.0(*)Glyme          30.0     16.0       2.5(*)DBE            30.0     45.0(*)    21.5(*)&#34;ARCOSOLV&#34; PM  30.0     35.0(*)    19.5(*)Acetone        30.0     19.5(*)    5.9(*)2-Pentanone    30.0     40.5(*)    14.5(*)Polymethylvinyl Ketone          30.0     61.0(*)    45.5(*)______________________________________ (* solution) 
    
     
                       TABLE IIA______________________________________Boiling Point Elevation Data           Boiling Point, °C.Compound          Actual  Raoult&#39;s Law______________________________________HCFC-123*         27.6    --DBE               196     --30/70 HCFC-123*/DBE             81      64DPM               188     --30/70 HCFC-123*/DPM             88      67DPMA              200     --30/70 HCFC-123*/DPMA             93      60______________________________________ *Commercial grade; typically including up to about 10 percent HCFC123a. 
    
     
                       TABLE IIB______________________________________Effect of Hydrogen Bonding Agentson Vapor Pressures ofHCFC-124, HFC-125, HFC-134, HFC-134a and HFC-32                Blowing     Blowing    Agent     Vapor PressuresBonding Agent     Agent      Wt. %     at 70° F., psig______________________________________None      CFC-114    100.0     12.9DBE       CFC-114    30.0      12.7    (*)None      HCFC-124   100.0     34.1DBE       HCFC-124   30.0      1.2     (*)Acetone   HCFC-124   30.0      0       (*)2-Pentanone     HCFC-124   30.0      1.8     (*)None      HFC-125    100.0     163.8DBE       HFC-125    30.0      35.0    (*)Acetone   HFC-125    30.0      10.0    (*)None      HFC-134a   100.0     81.3DBE       HFC-134a   30.0      15.3    (*)Acetone   HFC-134a   30.0      3.5     (*)2-Pentanone     HFC-134a   30.0      12.0    (*)None      HFC-134    100.0     60.2DBE       HFC-134    30.0      7.0     (*)Acetone   HFC-134    30.0      0       (*)None      HFC-32     100.0     206.3Acetone   HFC-32     30.0      41.0    (*)______________________________________ (* solution) 
    
     EXAMPLE 3 
     For comparison purposes, HCFC-22 was combined with non-hydrogen bonding agents, such as stearyl stearamide (&#34;KEMAMIDE&#34; S-180) and glycerol monostearate (&#34;WITCONOL&#34; MST), and the vapor pressure of HCFC-22 showed slight, if any, depression. Thus, compounds which form strong hydrogen bonds with themselves, e.g., glycerol monostearate, do not associate with HCFC-22 and do not reduce the measured vapor pressure. The vapor pressure data are shown in Table III. 
     
                       TABLE III______________________________________Vapor Pressure for HCFC-22with Non-Hydrogen Bonding Agents       Blowing Vapor Pressure       Agent   at 70° F., psigAdditive      Wt. %     CFC-12    HCFC-22______________________________________None          100.0     70.2      121.4&#34;KEMAMIDE&#34; S-180         30.0      70.2      121.4&#34;WITCONOL&#34; MST         30.0      70.2      118.0&#34;ALKAMIDE&#34; HTDE         30.0      70.2      105.0&#34;ARMID&#34; O     30.0      70.2      118.0&#34;SPAN&#34; 60     30.0      70.2      108.5Glycerin      30.0      70.2      121.4&#34;SELAR&#34; OH 3007         30.0      70.2      121.4&#34;SELAR&#34; PA 7426         30.0      70.2      121.4&#34;SURLYN&#34; 8396-2         30.0      70.2      121.4Polyacrylonitrile A-7         30.0      70.2      120.8&#34;SOLEF&#34; 1008-1001         30.0      70.2      121.4&#34;ELVANOL&#34; 90-50         30.0      70.2      121.4______________________________________ 
    
     EXAMPLE 4 
     The permeation of nitrogen and HCFC-22 through polystyrene film was measured for polymer films with and without blocking agents. 
     The permeation data was obtained on 15-20 mil thick polystyrene films which were prepared as follows: 
     (a) Hydrogen bond forming agents and polystyrene were passed through a twin screw extruder three times at 400° F. to ensure good blending of components. The extruder used was a 28 mm Werner and Pfleider, Stuttgart, Model 20S-K-28 twin screw. 
     (b) After pelletizing the extruded polymer, 15-20 mil thick films (in 6&#34;×6&#34; sheets) were pressed at about 35,000 psig pressure using a Barber-Coleman press. 
     (c) The 6&#34;×6&#34; sheets of 15-20 mil film were cut into 47 mm diameter circles or discs with a polymer die punch. 
     Permeation tests were run on polystyrene films containing various blocking agents to determine the permeation of air and blowing agents in polystyrene foam. Such film closely simulates polystyrene foam cell walls and the permeation data are predictive of foam blowing agent retention and susceptibility to air intrusion. Studies were made with HCFC-22 and nitrogen (simulating air). 
     Polystyrene Film Preparation 
     (A) Mixing Polystyrene/Additives by Extrusion 
     Samples of polystyrene (2500 grams) plus blocking agents were hand mixed and passed through a screw extruder three times at about 400° F. Three passes were used to ensure uniform blending of components. Since the polymer mixes were extruded into a water tank for cooling prior to pelletizing (between the passes through the extruder and after the third extrusion), the pelletized samples were dried about 16 hours in a vacuum oven at 175°-200° F. The extruder used was a 28 mm Werner and Pfleider, Stuttgart, Model 20S-K-28 twin screw. 
     (B) Film Pressing of Polystyrene/Additive Mixtures 
     Using a Barber-Coleman press, 30 gram samples of polystyrene/additive mixes (as pellets) were pressed into 6&#34;×6&#34; sheets of film with 15-20 mil thickness. The pressing was done at 400° F. and at a pressure of about 35,000 psig (maintained for 5 minutes). 
     (C) Film Discs for Permeation Tests 
     Discs (15-20 mil thickness) were cut from 6&#34;×6&#34; sheets of film. Five discs of 47 mm diameter were made from each sheet. The discs were cut or stamped at ambient temperature using a die punch made of A-2 type steel (hardened). 
     Permeation Test Procedure 
     The permeation tests on the polystyrene film containing blocking agents were conducted by a modification of ASTM D1434-82, &#34;Standard Method for Determining Gas Permeability Characteristics of Plastic Film and Sheeting&#34;. This modified procedure is described in the Master of Chemical Engineering Thesis, P. S. Mukherjee, Widener University, Chester, Pa., February 1988, entitled &#34;A Study of the Diffusion and Permeation Characteristics of Fluorocarbons Through Polymer Films&#34;. 
     Test Conditions 
     (1) All tests were run at a 20 psia pressure differential between the high pressure side and the low pressure side of the permeation cell. 
     (2) Permeation tests were run at 60° to 120° C., with tests for each blocking agent/polystyrene/gas combination being run at two or more temperatures. Data for other temperatures were calculate from the equation: ##EQU1##  where P is permeation coefficient, T is °K. (°C.+273.2) and A and B are constants determined from the permeation coefficients calculated from the following equation: ##EQU2## (3) The permeation rates are based on a 1 cm 2  by 1 cm thick film with a 1.0 psia pressure drop across the film. 
     The permeation rate and permeation coefficient data for nitrogen in polystyrene containing blocking agents are summarized in Table IV. Data for HCFC-22 in polystyrene containing blocking agents are shown in Table V. The units for permeation rate are g/hr and for permeation coefficient are cm 3  (STP).cm/sec-cm 2 .cmHg. The data summarized in Tables IV and V are calculated at 25° C. from data measured at other temperatures. 
     
                                           TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________Permeation DataPolymer: Polystyrene* Temperature: 25° C.          Wt. %               Permeation Coeff.                         Permeation                                % Change InBlocking  in   cm.sup.3 gas at STP cm                         Rate   PermeationGas  Agent     Polymer               sec cm.sup.2 (cm Hg)                         g/hr   Rate__________________________________________________________________________NitrogenNone      --   8.00 × 10.sup.-11                         1.86 × 10.sup.-9                                --Nitrogen&#34;WITCONOL&#34;          5.0  5.50 × 10.sup.-11                         1.28 × 10.sup.-9                                -31.2H35ANitrogen&#34;TRITON&#34; X-67          5.0  4.49 × 10.sup.-11                         1.04 × 10.sup.-9                                -44.1NitrogenPolypropylene          5.0  4.72 × 10.sup.-11                         1.10 × 10.sup.-9                                -40.9Glycol 2025Nitrogen&#34;TWEEN&#34; 61          5.0  4.672 × 10.sup.-11                         1.07 × 10.sup.-9                                -42.5__________________________________________________________________________ *&#34;DYLENE&#34; 8 polystyrene (Melt Index 6-7), Arco Chemical Company. 
    
     
                                           TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________Permeation DataPolymer: Polystyrene* Temperature: 25° C.              Permeation         Wt. %              Coefficient                        Permeation                               % Change In Blocking         in   cm.sup.3 gas at STP cm                        Rate   PermeationGas   Agent   Polymer              sec cm.sup.2 (cm Hg)                        g/hr   Rate__________________________________________________________________________HCFC-22 None    --   5.41 × 10.sup.-12                        3.89 × 10.sup.-10                               --HCFC-22 &#34;WITCONOL&#34;         5.0  2.21 × 10.sup.-12                        1.58 × 10.sup.-10                               -59.4 H35A__________________________________________________________________________ *&#34;DYLENE&#34; 8 polystyrene (Melt Index 6-7), Arco Chemical Company. 
    
     Example 5 
     In a manner analogous to Example 2, vapor pressure data were obtained for mixtures of HCFC-22 in polyols and for a mixture of HFC-134a in a polyol. The vapor pressure data are summarized in Table VI. 
     
                       TABLE VI______________________________________Effect of Polyols as Hydrogen Bonding Agentson Vapor Pressure of HCFC-22 and HFC-134a        Blowing               Vapor Pressure        Agent  at 70° F., psig______________________________________Hydrogen                FOUND      RAOULT&#39;SHydrogen Bonding          Wt. %    HCFC-22*   LAW______________________________________STEPANPOL PS-2502          2.9      0          15.2          5.4      13.5       27.7          7.8      17.0       37.0          17.9     43.5       64.5          20.6     64.0       68.0PLURACOL P-410 2.0      0          11.0          4.0      0          20.6          6.0      3.0        29.0          8.0      6.5        36.3          10.0     9.0        42.9          12.0     10.6       48.9PLURACOL TP-440          2.1      4.3        11.6          4.0      7.8        20.6          6.4      12.0       30.5          9.9      18.5       42.6          12.0     24.2       48.9PLURACOL 1016  1.8      0.8        7.3          4.0      4.8        15.3          6.0      8.0        22.0          8.2      15.0       28.7          10.1     17.0       33.2          12.1     20.5       39.2______________________________________Blocking Agent          FOUND      RAOULT&#39;SBonding Agent  Wt. %    HFC-134A*  LAW______________________________________PLURACOL PT-440          2.5      0          6.8          5.0      4.0        12.7          7.6      12.0       18.1          10.0     19.0       22.4______________________________________ *wt % blowing agent in hydrogen bonding agent 
    
     Example 6 
     To further verify the differences in behavior between the conventional chlorofluorocarbon blowing agents and the hydrogen-containing halocarbons, the solubility of HCFC-134a was compared to that of CFC-12. The CFC-12 was found to be miscible at 25° C. in 150 SUS (32 cs at 100° F.) oils including paraffinic oils, naphthenic oils, alkylated benzene oils and PAG* oils. In contrast, the HFC-134a was found to be insoluble (&lt;1 wt. percent) in the paraffinic oils, naphthenic oils and alkylated benzene oils. However, HFC-134a was found to be miscible in PAG oils at 25° C. 
    
     Example 7 
     Closed cell polyurethane thermoset foams were produced using CFC-11, HCFC-22 and HFC-134a as the primary blowing agent and CO 2  produced in situ by addition of water. The K-factor for the respective foams were measured and compared to vapor thermal conductivity data corresponding to the blowing agents. The respective recipe for both the A-side and the B-Side components and the resulting data are presented in Table VII along with the vapor thermal conductivity data. 
     
                                           TABLE VII__________________________________________________________________________Foams co-blown with water:__________________________________________________________________________A-Side         270 gms                PAPI 580B-Side         100 gms                STEPAPNOL PS-2502          2.3 gms                DC 193          5 gms HEXCEM 977          .35 gms                POLYCAT 8          2.5 gms                water          (see below)                halocarbon__________________________________________________________________________Foam Index** 250Blowing  B-Side          Volume of gas K-factor*Agent    vap. pres.          MOLES    Density                        age in days @ R.type  gms    psig  B.A.             CO.sub.2                total                   lbs/ft.sup.3                        5   6__________________________________________________________________________CFC-11 12 0     0.09             0.14                0.23                   3.42 0.171CFC-11 22 0     0.16             0.14                0.30                   3.24 0.162CFC-11 32.6    0     0.24             0.14                0.38                   3.31 0.151HCFC-22 12 33    0.14             0.14                0.28                   2.96 0.162HFC-134a 12 28    0.12             0.14                0.26                   2.97     0.172__________________________________________________________________________Foams blown without water:__________________________________________________________________________A-Side         158 gms                PAPI 580B-Side         100 gms                STEPANPOL PS-2502          1.7 gms                DC 193          1.35 gms                HEXCEM 977          .17 gms                POLYCAT 8          0.0 gms                water          (see below)                halocarbon__________________________________________________________________________Foam Index** 250Blowing  B-Side          Volume of gas K-factor*Agent    vap. pres.          MOLES    Density                        age in days @ R.type  gms    psig  B.A.             CO.sub.2                total                   lbs/ft.sup.3                        10__________________________________________________________________________CFC-11 41 0     0.30             0.00                0.30                   2.5  0.143HCFC-22 26 0     0.30             0.00                0.30                   2.8  0.162__________________________________________________________________________       VAPOR THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY DATA       VTC, Btu/hr · ft · °F.BLOWING AGENT       25° C.                    60° C.__________________________________________________________________________CFC-11      0.00451      0.00530CFC-22      0.00660      0.00748HFC-134a    0.00838      0.01020CO.sub.2    0.00953      0.01107__________________________________________________________________________ *(Btu · in/hr · ft.sup.2 · °F.) **(equivalents of isocyanate/equivalents of hydroxyl) × 100 
    
     The primary property of halocarbon blowing agents in insulating foam is to provide good thermal insulation by virtue of their low vapor thermal conductivity in the foam cells. By comparing the accompanying vapor thermal conductivity data (VTC) for CFC-11, and HFC-134a or CFC-22, it is apparent that conductivity of HFC-134a and CFC-22 is almost twice that of CFC-11. Thus it is to be expected that an insulating foam made with HFC-134a or CFC-22 would be a much poorer insulator than a foam made with CFC-11. On the contrary and as seen in the k-factor data, the insulation performance for the HFC-134a/CO 2  and CFC-22/CO 2  foam is unexpectedly and essentially the same as that for the CFC-11/CO 2  foam, wherein the HCFC-134a/CO 2  and CFC-22/CO 2  foam produced in the presence of the blocking agent exhibited extremely fine closed cell structure. 
     The chemicals used in the Previous Examples and tests are identified structurally and by source as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________Designation  Structure   Source______________________________________&#34;CARBOWAX&#34; 3350        Polyethylene                    Union Carbide Corp.        glycol&#34;CARBOWAX&#34; 8000        Polyethylene                    Union Carbide Corp.        glycol&#34;Pluronic&#34; F-108        Ethylene    BASF Wyandotte Corp.        oxide/propylene        oxide copolymer&#34;WITCONOL&#34; H35A        Polyethylene                    Witco Corp.        glycol (400)        stearate&#34;WITCONOL&#34; MST        Glycerol    Witco Corp.        monostearate&#34;TRITON&#34; X-67        Alkylpoly-  Rohm and Haas Co.        ethoxy ethanol&#34;TWEEN&#34; 61   POE (4)     ICI Americas, Inc.        sorbitan stearatePolypropylene        Polypropylene                    Union Carbide Corp.Glycol 2025  glycol&#34;ETHOFAT&#34; 0/20        Polyethylene                    Akzo Chemie America        oxide oleate&#34;ETHOMID&#34; HT/60        Polyethylene                    Akzo Chemie America        oxide fatty        acid amidePolyethylene Polyethylene                    Union Carbide Corp.Glycol Cpd 20M        glycol&#34;POLYOX&#34;     Polyethylene                    Union Carbide Corp.WSRN-10      oxide&#34;TERGITOL&#34;   Linear      Union Carbide Corp.15-S-20      alcohol/        ethylene oxide&#34;TERGITOL&#34;   Linear      Union Carbide Corp.24-L-92      alcohol/        ethylene oxide&#34;TERGITOL&#34; NP-40        Nonylphenol/                    Union Carbide Corp.        ethylene oxidePolypropylene        Polypropylene                    Union Carbide Corp.Glycol 425   glycol&#34;PLURACOL&#34; 975        Sucrose     BASF Wyandotte Corp.        polyol&#34;PLURACOL&#34; P-410        Polypropylene                    BASF Wyandotte Corp.        glycol&#34;PLURACOL&#34; P-440        Trifunctional                    BASF Wyandotte Corp.        polyol based        upon Polypro-        pylene glycol&#34;PLURACOL&#34; 1016        Trifunctional                    BASF Wyandotte Corp.        amino polyol&#34;STEPANPOL&#34;  Defunctional                    Stepan CompanyPS-2502      polyol based        upon Phthalic        anhydride&#34;PAPI&#34; 580   Methylene   DOW Chemicals        diisocyanate&#34;DC&#34; 193     Silicone    DOW Chemicals        surfactant&#34;HEXCEM&#34; 977 Potassium   Mooney Chemicals        octanoate&#34;POLYCAT&#34; 8  N,N-dimethyl-                    Air Products and        cyclohexyamine                    Chemicals, Inc.&#34;ETHOX&#34; DO-9 Polyethylene                    Ethox Chemicals Inc.        glycol dioleateGlyme        Ethylene    Aldrich Chemical Co.        glycol di-        methyletherDiglyme      2-Methoxy-  Aldrich Chemical Co.        ethyl etherDBE          Mixture of  Du Pont Co.        dimethyl adi-        pate, dimethyl        glutarate and        dimethyl        succinate*&#34;ARCOSOLV&#34; PM        Propylene   Arco Chemical Co.        glycol mono-        ethyl ether&#34;ARCOSOLV&#34; DPM        Dipropylene Arco Chemical Co.        glycol mono-        methyl ether&#34;ARCOSOLV&#34; DPMA        Dipropylene Arco Chemical Co.        glycol mono-        methyl ether        acetate&#34;KEMAMIDE&#34;   Stearyl     Witco Corp.S-180        stearamideAcetone      --          Fisher Scientific2-Pentanone  Methyl      Pfaltz and Bauer,Inc.        propyl ketone&#34;ALKAMIDE&#34;   stearic     Alkaril Chemicals, LtdHTDE         diethanolamide&#34;ARMID&#34; O    Oleamide    Akzo Chemie America&#34;SPAN&#34; 60    Sorbitan    ICI Americas, Inc.        stearateGlycerin     --          Aldrich Chemical Co.&#34;SELAR&#34; OH 3007        Ethylene/   Du Pont Co.        vinyl alcohol        copolymer&#34;SELAR&#34; PA 7426        Amorphous   Du Pont Co.        nylon&#34;SURLYN&#34; 8396-2        Ethylene/   Du Pont Co.        methacrylic        acid copolymerPolymeric    Acrylonitrile/                    Du Pont CO.Acrylonitrile A-7        methyl acrylate        copolymer&#34;SOLEF&#34; 1008-1001        Polyvinyli- Soltex Polymer Corp.        dene fluoride&#34; ELVANOL&#34; 90-50        Polyvinyl   Du Pont Co.        alcohol&#34;DYLENE&#34; 8   Polystyrene Arco Chemical Co.Polymethylvinyl        --          Monomer-PolymerKetone (8919)            Laboratories, Inc.CFC-12       Dichlorodi- Du Pont Co.        fluoromethaneCFC-114      1,2-dichloro-                    Du Pont Co.        tetrafluoro-        ethaneHCFC-22      Chlorodifluoro-                    Du Pont Co.        methaneHCFC-123     1,1,1-trifluoro-                    Du Pont Co.        2,2-dichloro-        ethaneHCFC-123a    1,1,2-trifluoro-                    Du Pont Co.        1,2-dichloro-        ethaneHCFC-124     1,1,1,2-tetra-                    Du Pont Co.        fluorochloro-        ethaneHFC-125      Pentafluoro-                    Du Pont Co.        ethaneHFC-32       Difluoro-   Du Pont Co.        methaneHFC-134      1,1,2,2-tetra-                    Du Pont Co.        fluoroethaneHFC-134a     1,1,1,2-tetra-                    Du Pont Co.        fluoroethaneHCFC-141b    1-fluoro-1,1-di-                    Du Pont Co.        chloroethane______________________________________ *17/66/16.5 mixture of esters 
    
     Having thus described and exemplified the invention with a certain degree of specificity, it should be appreciated that the following claims are not to be so limited but are to be afforded a scope commensurate with the wording of each element of the claims and equivalents thereof.