Abstract:
A TiAl composition is prepared to have high strength and to have improved ductility by altering the atomic ratio of the titanium and aluminum to have what has been found to be a highly desirable effective aluminum concentration by addition of vanadium and rapid solidification from the melt according to the approximate formula Ti 49  Al 48  V 3 .

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     Ser. Nos. 138,407; 138,408; 138,485; 138,486; and 138,481; filed Dec. 28, 1987 respectively. 
     The texts of these related applications are incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates generally to alloys of titanium and aluminum. More particularly it relates to alloys of titanium and aluminum which have been modified both with respect to stoichiometric ratio and with respect to vanadium addition. 
     It is known that as aluminum is added to titanium metal in greater and greater proportions the crystal form of the resultant titanium aluminum composition changes. Small percentages of aluminum go into solid solution in titanium and the crystal form results that of alpha titanium. At higher concentrations of aluminum (including about 25 to 35 atomic %) an intermetallic compound Ti 3  Al is formed. The Ti 3  Al has an ordered hexagonal crystal form called alpha-2. At still higher concentrations of aluminum (including the range of 50 to 60 atomic % aluminum) another intermetallic compound, TiAl, is formed having an ordered tetragonal crystal form called gamma. 
     The alloy of titanium and aluminum having a gamma crystal form and a stoichiometric ratio of approximately one is an intermetallic compound having a high modulus, a low density, a high thermal conductivity, good oxidation resistance, and good creep resistance. The relationship between the modulus and temperature for TiAl compounds to other alloys of titanium and in relation to nickel base superalloys is shown in FIG. 1. As is evident from the figure the TiAl has the best modulus of any of the titanium alloys. Not only is the TiAl modulus higher at temperature but the rate of decrease of the modulus with temperature increase is lower for TiAl than for the other titanium alloys. Moreover, the TiAl retains a useful modulus at temperatures above those at which the other titanium alloys become useless. Alloys which are based on the TiAl intermetallic compound are attractive lightweight materials for use where high modulus is required at high temperatures and where good environmental protection is also required. 
     One of the characteristics of TiAl which limits its actual application to such uses is a brittleness which is found to occur at room temperature. Also the strength of the intermetallic compound at room temperature needs improvement before the TiAl intermetallic compound can be exploited in structural component applications. Improvements of the TiAl intermetallic compound to enhance ductility and/or strength at room temperature are very highly desirable in order to permit use of the compositions at the higher temperatures for which they are suitable. 
     With potential benefits of use at light weight and at high temperatures, what is most desired in the TiAl compositions which are to be used is a combination of strength and ductility at room temperature. A minimum ductility of the order of one percent is acceptable for some applications of the metal composition but higher ductilities are much more desirable. A minimum strength for a composition to be useful is about 50 ksi or about 350 MPa. However, materials having this level of strength are of marginal utility and higher strengths are often preferred for some applications. 
     The stoichiometric ratio of TiAl compounds can vary over a range without altering the crystal structure. The aluminum content can vary from about 50 to about 60 atom percent. The properties of TiAl compositions are subject to very significant changes as a result of relatively small changes of one percent or more in the stoichiometric ratio of the titanium and aluminum ingredients. Also the properties are similarly affected by the addition of relatively similar small amounts of ternary elements. 
     PRIOR ART 
     There is extensive literature on the compositions of titanium aluminum including the Ti 3  Al intermetallic compound, the TiAl intermetallic compounds and the TiAl 3  intermetallic compound. A patent, 4,294,615, entitled &#34;Titanium Alloys of the TiAl Type&#34; and naming Blackburn and Smith as inventors, contains an extensive discussion of the titanium aluminide type alloys including the TiAl intermetallic compound. As is pointed out in the patent in column 1 starting at line 50 in discussing TiAl&#39;s advantages and disadvantages relative to Ti 3  Al: 
     &#34;It should be evident that the TiAl gamma alloy system has the potential for being lighter inasmuch as it contains more aluminum. Laboratory work in the 1950&#39;s indicated that titanium aluminide alloys had the potential for high temperature use to about 1000° C. But subsequent engineering experience with such alloys was that, while they had the requisite high temperature strength, they had little or no ductility at room and moderate temperatures, i.e., from 20° to 550° C. Materials which are too brittle cannot be readily fabricated, nor can they withstand infrequent but inevitable minor service damage without cracking and subsequent failure. They are not useful engineering materials to replace other base alloys.&#34; 
     It is known that the alloy system TiAl is substantially different from Ti 3  Al (as well as from solid solution alloys of Ti) although both TiAl and Ti 3  Al are basically ordered titanium aluminum intermetallic compounds. As the U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,615 points out at the bottom of column 1: 
     &#34;Those well skilled recognize that there is a substantial difference between the two ordered phases. Alloying and transformational behavior of Ti 3  Al resemble those of titanium as the hexagonal crystal structures are very similar. However, the compound TiAl has a tetragonal arrangement of atoms and thus rather different alloying characteristics. Such a distinction is often not recognized in the earlier literature.&#34; 
     The U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,615 describes the alloying of TiAl with vanadium and carbon to achieve some property improvements in the resulting alloy. The patent also reported ductility improvements in TiAl containing vanadium at the level of 0.5 and 1.0 atomic percent (0.7 and 1.4 wt. % respectively). The patent further reported, as plotted in FIG. 3, that the addition of 2.5 at.% (3.4 wt. %) of vanadium resulted in reduced ductility. There is no invention or disclosure in U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,615 of preparation of vanadium containing TiAl compositions through rapid solidification techniques. 
     A number of technical publications dealing with the titanium aluminum compounds as well as with the characteristics of these compounds are as follows: 
     1. E. S. Bumps, H. D. Kessler, and M. Hansen, &#34;Titanium-Aluminum System&#34;, Journal of Metals, June, 1952, pp. 609-614, TRANSACTIONS AIME, Vol. 194. 
     2. H. R. Ogden, D. J. Maykuth, W. L. Finlay, and R. I. Jaffee, &#34;Mechanical Properties of High Purity Ti-Al Alloys&#34;, Journalof Metals, February, 1953, pp. 267-272, TRANSACTIONS AIME, Vol. 197. 
     3. Joseph B. McAndrew, and H. D. Kessler, &#34;Ti-36 Pct Al as a Base for High Temperature Alloys&#34;, Journal of Metals, October, 1956, pp. 1348-1353, TRANSACTIONS AIME, Vol. 206. 
     In U.S. Pat. No. 2,880,087 Jaffee discloses that 0.5 to 5 weight % vanadium improved the room temperature tensile ductility of an alloy having 8 to 10 weight % of aluminum. This alloy with its low percentage of aluminum is entirely distinct from the compositions containing the much higher concentrations of aluminum of this invention. 
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     One object of the present invention is to provide a method of forming a titanium aluminum intermetallic compound having improved ductility and related properties at room temperature. 
     Another object is to improve the properties of titanium aluminum intermetallic compounds at low and intermediate temperatures. 
     Another object is to provide an alloy of titanium and aluminum having improved properties and processability at low and intermediate temperatures. 
     Other objects wil be in part, apparent and in part, pointed out in the description which follows. 
     In one of its broader aspects the objects of the present invention are achieved by providing a nonstoichiometric TiAl base alloy, and adding a relatively low concentration of vanadium to the nonstoichiometric composition. The addition is followed by rapidly solidifying the vanadium-containing nonstoichiometric TiAl intermetallic compound. Addition of vanadium in the order of approximately 2 to 4 parts in 100 is contemplated. 
     The rapidly solidified composition may be consolidated as by isostatic pressing and extrusion to form a solid composition of the present invention. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the relationship between modulus and temperature for an assortment of alloys. 
     FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the relationship between load in pounds and crosshead displacement in mils for TiAl compositions of different stoichiometry tested in 4-point bending. 
     FIG. 3 is a graph similar to that of FIG. 2 in which a comparison of the relationship of the properties of TiAl to those of vanadium modified TiAl is provided. 
     FIG. 4 is a graph in which the vanadium content of a TiAl alloy is plotted against outer fiber strain in percent. 
     FIG. 5 is a bar graph showing the values of fracture strength, yield strength and outer fiber strain for Ti 49  Al 48  V 3  in relation to the base metal. 
     FIG. 6 is a graph in which yield strength in psi is plotted against test temperature for a sample of Ti 49  Al 48  V 3  annealed at 1300° C. as measured by a conventional compression test. The measurement of yield and rupture strength by conventional compression or tension methods tends to be lower than the results obtained by four point bending as is evident by comparing the results plotted in this figure with those plotted in FIG. 5. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     EXAMPLES 1-3 
     Three individual melts were prepared to contain titanium and aluminum in various stoichiometric ratios approximating that of TiAl. The compositions, annealing temperatures and test results of tests made on the compositions are set forth in Table I. 
     For each example the alloy was first made into an ingot by electric arc melting. The ingot was processed into ribbon by melt spinning in a partial pressure of argon. In both stages of the melting, a water-cooled copper hearth was used as the container for the melt in order to avoid undesirable melt-container reactions. Also care was used to avoid exposure of the hot metal to oxygen because of the strong affinity of titanium for oxygen. 
     The rapidly solidified ribbon was packed into a steel can which was evacuated and then sealed. The can was then hot isostatically pressed (HIPped) at 950° C. (1740° F.) for 3 hours under a pressure of 30 ksi. The HIPping can was machined off the consolidated ribbon plug. The HIPped sample was a plug about one inch in diameter and three inches long. 
     The plug was placed axially into a center opening of a billet and sealed therein. The billet was heated to 975° C. (1787° F.) and is extruded through a die to give a reduction ratio of about 7 to 1. The extruded plug was removed from the billet and was heat treated. 
     The extruded samples were then annealed at temperatures as indicated in Table I for two hours. The annealing was followed by aging at 1000° C. for two hours. Specimens were machined to the dimension of 1.5×3×25.4 mm (0.060×0.120×1.0 in) for four point bending tests at room temperature. The bending tests were carried out in a 4-point bending fixture having an inner span of 10 mm (0.4 in) and an outer span of 20 mm (0.8 in). The load-crosshead displacement curves were recorded. Based on the curves developed the following properties are defined: 
     1. Yield strength is the flow stress at a cross head displacement of one thousandth of an inch. This amount of cross head displacement is taken as the first evidence of plastic deformation and the transition from elastic deformation to plastic deformation. The measurement of yield and/or fracture strength by conventional compression or tension methods tends to give results which are lower than the results obtained by four point bending as carried out in making the measurements reported herein. The higher levels of the results from four point bending measurements should be kept in mind when comparing these values to values obtained by the conventional compression or tension methods. However, the comparison of measurement results in the examples herein is between four point bending tests for all samples measured and such comparisons are quite valid in establishing the differences in strength properties resulting from differences in composition or in processing of the compositions. 
     2. Fracture strength is the stress to fracture. 
     3. Outer fiber strain is the quantity of 9.71hd where h is the specimen thickness in inches and d is the cross head displacement of fracture in inches. Metallurgically, the value calculated represents the amount of plastic deformation experienced at the outer surface of the bending specimen at the time of fracture. 
     The results are listed in the following Table I. Table I contains data on the properties of samples annealed at 1300° C. and further data on these samples in particular is given in FIG. 2. 
     
                       TABLE I______________________________________                                      OuterGamma    Com-     Anneal                        Yield  Fracture                                      FiberEx.  Alloy    posit.   Temp. Strength                               Strength                                      StrainNo.  No.      (wt. %)  (°C.)                        (ksi)  (ksi)  (%)______________________________________1    83       Ti.sub.54 Al.sub.46                  1250  131    132     0.1                  1300  111    120    0.1                  1350  --*    58     02    12       Ti.sub.52 Al.sub.48                  1250  130    180    1.1                  1300  98     128    0.9                  1350  88     122    0.9                  1400  70     85     0.23    85       Ti.sub.50 A1.sub.50                  1250  83     92     0.3                  1300  93     97     0.3                  1350  78     88     0.4______________________________________ *No measurable value was found because the sample lacked sufficient ductility to obtain a measurement. 
    
     It is evident from the data of this table that alloy 12 for Example 2 exhibited the best combination of properties. This confirms that the properties of Ti-Al compositions are very sensitive to the Ti/Al atomic ratios and to the heat treatment applied. Alloy 12 was selected as the base alloy for further property improvements based on further experiments which were performed as described below. 
     It is also evident that the anneal at temperatures between 1250° C. and 1350° C. results in the test specimens having desirable levels of yield strength, fracture strength and outer fiber strain. However, the anneal at 1400° C. results in a test specimen having a significantly lower yield strength (about 20% lower); lower fracture strength (about 30% lower) and lower ductility (about 78% lower) than a test specimen annealed at 1350° C. The sharp decline in properties is due to a dramatic change in microstructure due in turn to an extensive beta transformation at temperatures appreciably above 1350° C. 
     EXAMPLES 4-13 
     Ten additional individual melts were prepared to contain titanium and aluminum in designated atomic ratios as well as additives in relatively small atomic percents. 
     Each of the samples was prepared as described above with reference to Examples 1-3. 
     The compositions, annealing temperatures, and test results of tests made on the compositions are set forth in Table II in comparison to alloy 12 as the base alloy for this comparison. 
     
                                           TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________                            Outer   Gamma          Anneal                 Yield Fracture                            FiberEx.   Alloy Composit.             Temp.                 Strength                       Strength                            StrainNo.   No.   (at. %)  (°C.)                 (ksi) (ksi)                            (%)__________________________________________________________________________2  12    Ti.sub.52 Al.sub.48             1250                 130   180  1.1             1300                 98    128  0.9             1350                 88    122  0.94  22    Ti.sub.50 Al.sub.47 Ni.sub.3             1200                 --*   131  05  24    Ti.sub.52 Al.sub.46 Ag.sub.2             1200                 --*   114  0             1300                 92    117  0.56  25    Ti.sub.50 Al.sub.48 Cu.sub.2             1250                 --*   83   0             1300                 80    107  0.8             1350                 70    102  0.97  32    Ti.sub.54 Al.sub.45 Hf.sub.1             1250                 130   136  0.1             1300                 72    77   0.18  41    Ti.sub.52 Al.sub.44 Pt.sub.4             1250                 132   150  0.39  45    Ti.sub.51 Al.sub.47 C.sub.2             1300                 136   149  0.110 57    Ti.sub.50 Al.sub.48 Fe.sub.2             1250                 --*   89   0             1300                 --*   81   0             1350                 86    111  0.511 82    Ti.sub.50 Al.sub.48 Mo.sub.2             1250                 128   140  0.2             1300                 110   136  0.5             1350                 80    95   0.112 39    Ti.sub.50 Al.sub.46 Mo.sub.4             1200                 --*   143  0             1250                 135   154  0.3             1300                 131   149  0.213 20    Ti.sub.49.5 Al.sub.49.5 Er.sub.1             +   +     +    +__________________________________________________________________________ *See asterisk note to Table I. +Material fractured during machining to prepare test specimens. 
    
     For Examples 4 and 5 heat treated at 1200° C., the yield strength was unmeasurable as the ductility was found to be essentially nil. For the specimen of Example 5 which was annealed at 1300° C., the ductility increased, but it was still undesirably low. 
     For Example 6 the same was true for the test specimen annealed at 1250° C. For the specimens of Example 6 which were annealed at 1300° and 1350° C. the ductility was significant but the yield strength was low. 
     None of the test specimens of the other Examples were found to have any significant level of ductility. 
     It is evident from the results listed in Table II that the sets of parameters involved in preparing compositions for testing are quite complex and interrelated. One parameter is the atomic ratio of the titanium relative to that of aluminum. From the data plotted in FIG. 2 it is evident that the stoichiometric ratio or non-stoichiometric ratio has a strong influence on the test properties which formed for different compositions. 
     Another set of parameters is the additive chosen to be included into the basic TiAl composition. A first parameter of this set concerns whether a particular additive acts as a substituent for titanium or for aluminum. A specific metal may act in either fashion and there is no simple rule by which it can be determined which role an additive will play. The significance of this parameter is evident if we consider addition of some atomic percentage of additive X. 
     If X acts as a titanium substituent then a composition Ti 48  Al 48  X 4  will give an effective aluminum concentration of 48 atomic percent and an effective titanium concentration of 52 atomic percent. 
     If by contrast the X additive acts as an aluminum substituent then the resultant composition will have an effective aluminum concentration of 52 percent and an effective titanium concentration of 48 atomic percent. 
     Accordingly the nature of the substitution which takes place is very important but is also highly unpredictable. 
     Another parameter of this set is the concentration of the additive. 
     Still another parameter evident from Table II is the annealing temperature. The annealing temperature which produces the best strength properties for one additive can be seen to be different for a different additive. This can be seen by comparing the results set forth in Example 6 with those set forth in Example 7. 
     In addition there may be a combined concentration and annealing effect for the additive so that optimum property enhancement, if any enhancement is found, can occur at a certain combination of additive concentration and annealing temperature so that higher and lower concentrations and/or annealing temperatures are less effective in providing a desired property improvement. 
     The content of Table II makes clear that the results obtainable from addition of a ternary element to a non-stoichiometric TiAl composition are highly unpredictable and that most test results are unsuccessful with respect to ductility or strength or to both. 
     EXAMPLES 14-16 
     Three additional samples were prepared as described above with reference to Examples 1-3 to contain titanium aluminide having compositions respectively as listed in Table III. 
     The Table III summarizes the bend test results on all of the alloys both standard and modified under the various heat treatment conditions deemed relevant. 
     
                                           TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________FOUR-POINT BEND PROPERTIES OF V-MODIFIED TiAl ALLOYS                             Outer   Gamma   Compo-  Annealing                  Yield Fracture                             Fiber   Alloy   sition  Temperature                  Strength                        Strength                             StrainEx.   Number   (at. %) (°C.)                  (ksi) (ksi)                             (%)__________________________________________________________________________2  12   Ti.sub.52 Al.sub.48           1250   130   180  1.1           1300   98    128  0.9           1350   88    122  0.9           1400   70    85   0.214 13   Ti--48Al--1V           1250   112   146  1.1           1300   99    141  1.3           1350   91    131  1.115 14   Ti--48Al--3V           1300   94    145  1.6           1350   84    136  1.516 51   Ti--48Al--5V           1250   125   172  1.1           1300   108   145  0.7           1350   78    103  0.3__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     Please note that the aluminum concentration is the same for all four compositions listed in Table III. 
     From the data tabulated in Table III it is evident that there is a progressively decreasing strength with increasing heat treatment temperature for all samples tested. 
     There is essentially no loss of ductility at higher heat treatment temperatures for the lower vanadium concentrations but a significant decrease occurs at the highest vanadium concentration. 
     The highest ductility was achieved at the 3 at.% vanadium level and this is evident from FIG. 4. 
     Two TiAl compositions with two different vanadium concentrations were tested and the results are plotted in FIG. 3 relative to the plot of the Ti 52  Al 48 . Superior results for Ti 51  Al 48  V 1  and for Ti 49  Al 48  V 3  are displayed. 
     In FIG. 4 the vanadium concentration in atomic percent is plotted against outer fiber strain. A very distinctive maximum is seen to occur in the range of about 2 to 4 atomic percent and an optimum at about 3 atomic percent. 
     FIG. 5 is a bar graph which displays properties of TiAl alloy containing 3 at.% vanadium relative to that of the base metal. 
     FIG. 6 is a plot of the yield strength of the vanadium containing TiAl at room temperature and at the higher temperatures shown. 
     The superior results which are achieved in practice of the present invention are due to the processing by rapid solidification techniques. As is pointed out above there is no disclosure in the Blackburn and Smith U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,615 of the use of rapid solidification processing. The results we achieve contrast with those of Blackburn and Smith in that although they show by their Figure a decreasing ductility with increasing vanadium concentration with the lowest ductility value at 2.5 atomic %, we found that for rapidly solidified alloys the ductility increases at increasing vanadium concentration in the 2.5 atomic percent range and a maximum is reached between 2 and 4 atomic percent with an optimum at least about 3 atomic percent.