Abstract:
Aircraft configuration by applying the following method steps for improving the conventional box wing aircraft concept: dividing both the backward swept front and the forward swept rear wings into root and tip sections, wherein the tip sections ( 34 ) of the front wings are more backward swept than the root sections ( 37 ), and the tip sections ( 35 ) of the rear wings are more forward swept than the root sections ( 38 ). Preferred embodiments comprise moving the front wing to the nose and the rear wing towards the rear end of a long fuselage; adding a middle wing and thereby decreasing the wingspan by one third; dividing the middle wing into a backward swept root section ( 28 ) and two tip sections ( 29,30 ), one forward and another backward swept. The four wingtips on each side are interconnected by a wingtip fence ( 26 ), obtaining seven closed frame structures, as well as seven aerodynamic channels for the stream flow.

Description:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
       [0001]    This application claims priority from RCD EM 002544510-0001 and 002544510-0002, both filed on Sep. 25, 2014, with OHIM/OAMI Reference “StratosLiner”; and also priority from US Design Patent Application No. 29520505 filed on Mar. 16, 2015, titled “Backward and forward swept aircraft wing sections in a decagonal box wing configuration”. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    This invention relates to the field of box wing aircraft design, with a focus on novel improvements of some of the features and adding new elements to the prior art in this field. 
         [0003]    The regular, conventional box wing configuration is comprised of a thin and straight backward swept and slightly dihedral front wing, a similarly thin and straight forward swept rear wing and a connecting non-lifting wingtip fence between the wingtips. The front wing root joins the lower part of the fuselage and the root of the rear wing joins the upper part of the fuselage, or the roots of the rear wings are elevated above the aft part of the fuselage using a vertical stabilizer, or two V-tails, for structural connection to the fuselage. 
         [0004]    The thin front and rear wings of a box wing aircraft, together, must provide a sufficient wing area, compared to a monoplane aircraft with the same weight. Thereby, the wingspan of such a box wing aircraft is similar to that of a monoplane aircraft. For several reasons, a smaller wingspan is often preferable. Very large airliners should have a small wingspan to be manageable for our airports. It is desirable for airliners to carry more than a thousand passengers, but such a monoplane is difficult to design, because of the large wingspan. 
         [0005]    Such a large aircraft is not easy to design as a box wing biplane either. The wingspan is still large and the thin wings suffer bending and torsion, especially at the wingtips. The length of the wingtip fence is an important parameter for structural calculations. It may prove that the closed frame structure of the front and rear wings is not sufficiently strong and stiff. There is a risk that the wingtip fence of the regular, conventional biplane box wing configuration must be strengthened a lot and might therefore be too heavy. 
         [0006]    One of the general ideas behind using thin wings is better aerodynamic performance. But airliners must carry a lot of fuel in the huge wings for long distance flights. There is not much place for fuel in the thin wings of a box wing aircraft. 
         [0007]    It is necessary to obtain sufficient horizontal and vertical separation between multiple wings because of the aerodynamic interference issue. Otherwise, the box wing configuration is aerodynamically advantageous. The main streamline flow around the box wing aircraft is divided into two channels by the frame of the front and rear wings. There are three stream tube channels when the elevated rear wings and the fuselage are connected with V-tails. It would be preferable to have a narrow stream tube as a result of a small wingspan, and the aerodynamic performance would improve having more aerodynamic channels than two or three. 
         [0008]    There is a box wing aircraft configuration implicitly disclosed in RDC EM 002544510-0001, a strictly aesthetic design, presented with not less than 12 measured pairs of dimensions with the Golden Ratio 1.618. Furthermore, there are also 13 leading and trailing edges presented with the measured Golden Angle and the angles of the Golden Triangle. The four engines of the aircraft in question form no part of the claimed design but this aircraft is not functional because all the four engines are clearly Ramjet-type engines which need an established airflow of several hundred km/h for start. The present invention is addressing this issue, too. 
         [0009]    Furthermore, airport boarding bridges are not designed for a box wing aircraft. This problem must be resolved if the box wing concept is to be used for large passenger aircraft. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0010]    As the result of applying several method steps for improving the regular, conventional box wing concept, the preferred embodiment of the present invention comprises an extended fuselage; a pair of backward swept front wings attached to the front bottom of the fuselage; a pair of elevated forward swept rear wings with their roots joined together above the aft part of the fuselage; a highly swept wingtip fence on each side, connecting the wingtips of the front and rear wings; a V-tail, for structural connection between the rear wings and the fuselage; furthermore also a middle wing, extending from the upper middle part of the fuselage. 
         [0011]    The front wing is divided into a dihedral root section, swept substantially as the wing of a modern airliner, and a more dihedral and more swept tip section. The rear wing is divided into a substantially horizontal root section, with a sweep angle similar to the swept wing of a modern airliner but forward swept, and a tip section, slightly anhedral and more forward swept than the sweep angle of the root section of the rear wing. 
         [0012]    In the preferable embodiment, the middle wing is divided into a substantially horizontal or slightly anhedral root section and two tip sections, one forward swept and anhedral, another backward swept and dihedral. The front, middle and rear wings have four tip sections on each side of the aircraft. All the four wingtips of these are attached to the wingtip fence; two are joined to the front portion and two to the aft portion of the wingtip fence. 
         [0013]    The root section of the middle wing is a suitable place for engines. If we use two traditional inner engines instead of the Ramjet-type engines disclosed in the above mentioned design, EM 002544510-0001, the aircraft will be functional because gas turbine engines can give the aircraft the necessary velocity needed for the two outer, Ramjet-type engines, to start. 
         [0014]    The fuselage of the present invention is area ruled which is a regular design procedure. The result is that a long middle section of the extended fuselage has a wide belly which can contain both landing gears and a large fuel tank. Dividing the front and rear wings to differently swept sections increases the cross sectional area both front and rear and decreases it along a longer middle part of the aircraft. This novel, distinguishing feature makes a wider fuselage belly and thereby a larger fuel tank possible, the area rule design method still applied. 
         [0015]    Another reason for using differently swept sections of the front and rear wings is that otherwise the wingtip fence would have been too long and too weak, especially when the fuselage is long and the front and rear wings are well separated horizontally. 
         [0016]    With a middle wing introduced, the necessary wing area is distributed to three thin wings, which makes a smaller wingspan, reduced by one third, possible. Shorter wings are stronger than long wings. Having a middle wing with two tip sections, both supporting the wingtip fence, is a desired feature if the box wing structure is to be strengthened. 
         [0017]    The wings and fins of the regular, conventional box wing aircraft form two, or three, closed frames. Having a middle wing with two tip sections, the number of strong and stiff closed frame structures will be seven, formed by the  14  wing sections, together with the wingtip fences, the two V-tails and the fuselage. 
         [0018]    These seven frames provide not only novel structural features but distinguishing aerodynamic benefits as well. These seven frames divide the stream tube around the aircraft into seven airflow channels. Using one vertical stabilizer instead of V-tails, the channels will be reduced to six. Embodiment with a simple, straight middle wing can result in four or five aerodynamic channels, with one stabilizer or two V-tails, respectively. 
         [0019]    There are a number of other qualities of the present invention which should be briefly mentioned, where the distinguishing features of the present invention improve, or significantly improve, the functioning of the box wing aircraft as such. These improved functions are flexibility with cargo placement; reduced concerns as regards stalling; good maneuverability and stability in difficult flying conditions; redundant aerodynamic devices in many places that also provide more safety; lower angle of attack as well as reduced speed and less engine power with less noise at takeoff and landing; etc. The invention also makes it possible to build very large, extended aircraft with manageable wingspan where the distributed load on the three relatively short box wings allows using more composite materials in the wings that are still thin and strong. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0020]      FIG. 1  is a top view illustration of the monoplane wing concept. 
           [0021]      FIG. 2  is a top view illustration of the regular, conventional box wing concept. 
           [0022]      FIG. 3  is a top view illustration of an extended fuselage with regular, conventional box wings, when maximal horizontal separation is obtained. 
           [0023]      FIG. 4  is a top view illustration of an extended fuselage with angled front and angled rear wing sections in a box wing configuration, when maximal horizontal separation is obtained. 
           [0024]      FIG. 5  is a top view illustration of angled front and angled rear wing sections in a box wing configuration; embodiment with short wingspan and a straight, simple middle wing. 
           [0025]      FIG. 6  is a top view illustration of angled front and angled rear wing sections in a box wing configuration; embodiment with short wingspan and a middle wing with two tip sections. 
           [0026]      FIG. 7  is an enlarged partial perspective view of an embodiment where the root section of the middle wing is connected to the forward swept and the backward swept tip sections. 
           [0027]      FIG. 8  is a front elevation view of an embodiment where the middle wing has two tip sections and the rear wings are supported by a vertical stabilizer. 
           [0028]      FIG. 9  is a front elevation view of an embodiment where the middle wing has two tip sections and the rear wings are supported by V-tails. 
           [0029]      FIG. 10  is a perspective view of an embodiment of the invention with combined propulsion. 
           [0030]      FIG. 11  is a front elevation view of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 . 
           [0031]      FIG. 12  is a side elevation view of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 ; the right and left side views are mirror images 
           [0032]      FIG. 13  is a top plan view of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 . 
           [0033]      FIG. 14  is a rear elevation view of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 . 
           [0034]      FIG. 15  is a bottom plan view of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 . 
           [0035]      FIG. 16  is a perspective view illustration of an Airport Shuttle Vehicle for embarking and disembarking a box wing aircraft, with the passenger cabin in elevated position. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0036]    Referring now to the drawings, most of the embodiments show a large airliner or cargo plane. The present invention is in no way limited to this type of aircraft; it is applicable to any aircraft of any size, any purpose and application; manned or unmanned; and with any type of propulsion or combination of different propulsion systems for different flying conditions, without any limit as regards speed, altitude or function. The scope of the invention is not limited by materials. Any materials can be used allowing the construction and operation of the invention. Airfoils and other details of the embodiment and structure are established in a way that will be understood by those skilled in the art. Throughout the drawings, the symmetric aircraft parts, one positioned on one side of the fuselage and another on the opposite side, are provided with only one particular reference numeral when it is clear that the numbered item has an identical mirrored counterpart. 
         [0037]      FIG. 1  is a top view illustration of the regular monoplane concept of today&#39;s civilian aircraft, for comparisons with  FIG. 2 , which is a basic illustration of the regular, conventional box wing concept of an aircraft with the same overall length. The regular monoplane has one pair of backward swept wings  1 , mounted to the fuselage  2 . 
         [0038]      FIG. 2  is a top view illustration of the basic box wing configuration of the prior art, comprising a pair of straight backward swept front wings  3 , mounted to the lower part of the fuselage  4 ; a pair of straight forward swept rear wings  5  and a wingtip fence  6  which is a structural interconnecting vertical fin between the wingtips. The roots of the two rear wings  5  are joined together and connected to the fuselage  4  with a vertical stabilizer fin  7 , in a typical embodiment. There are different embodiments in the field of the prior art but one common feature is that the distance between the front part of the front wing  3  and the rear part of the rear wing  5  is smaller, or significantly smaller, than the length of the fuselage  4 . 
         [0039]    The monoplane wing area is substantially the same as the total wing area of the box wing biplane, if the same weight to be lifted. When inventors and manufacturers design their modern box wing aircraft, they use thin wings, for aerodynamic reasons, and their wingspan is not significantly different from the wingspan of the monoplane they want to compete with. 
         [0040]      FIG. 1  also indicates one application of the area rule design principle for monoplanes, namely making the fuselage  2  thinner where the cross sectional area of the wings is largest. The corresponding area rule solution for a box wing aircraft is to make the fuselage  4  wider between the wings because the cross sectional area of the wings is smallest at midway between the front wing  3  and the rear wing  5 . The fuselage of the box wing aircraft  4  is therefore provided with a wide belly extension  8 , as it is shown in  FIG. 2 . 
         [0041]    A significant conceptual difference between the monoplane and the box wing concept is that the large wing volume of a monoplane is generally used to contain large fuel tanks while the thin box wings cannot hold a lot of fuel, and therefore, the wide belly extension  8  of the fuselage  4  is suitable as a fuel tank. 
         [0042]      FIG. 3  is an illustration of a box wing aircraft applied to a longer fuselage  9  where the front wing  10  is located as front as possible and the rear wing  11  is located as rear as possible. The reasons for moving the front wing  10  and the rear wing  11  as far from each other as possible are to achieve good horizontal separation between the wings; to obtain lifting forces as far to the front respective as far to the rear as possible; as well as to have aerodynamic devices, stabilizing functions and maneuverability as far from the center of gravity as possible, and thereby reducing cargo placement issues, reducing the risk for stall and increasing the safety. The prior art does not prioritize this idea, because visibility in front is more important to manufacturers. 
         [0043]    The long fuselage  9  in  FIG. 3  and the location of the front and rear wings,  10  and  11 , provide very good horizontal separation between the wings, but the disadvantage is that the wingtips are too far away from each other, needing a very long, and thereby weak, connecting wingtip fence  12 . 
         [0044]    The solution provided by the present invention is shown in  FIG. 4 , namely a division of the front wing into a root section  13  and a tip section  14 , as well as a division of the rear wing into a root section  15  and a tip section  16 . The root and the tip sections are differently swept. The root of the root section of the backward swept front wing  13  joins the fuselage  9  near the lower part of the nose. This root section  13  is dihedral and slightly tapered. The wingtip of the root section of the front wing  13  joins the root of the tip section of the front wing  14 . This tip section  14  is also slightly tapered and dihedral, but more dihedral than the root section  13 . 
         [0045]    The root section of the backward swept front wing  13  has a sweep angle  17  similar to that of a modern airliner. This sweep angle  17  is smaller than the sweep angle  18  of the backward swept tip section of the front wing  14 . The root section of the forward swept rear wing  15  has a substantially same sweep angle  19  as the sweep angle  17  of the root section of the front wing  13 , but this angle  19  is a forward sweep angle. This sweep angle  19  is smaller than the sweep angle  20  of the forward swept tip section of the rear wing  16 . Thereby the wingtip fence  21  is shorter, and stronger, compared to the wingtip fence  12  of the prior art, when the straight box wings  10  and  11  are longitudinally stretched, as shown in  FIG. 3 . 
         [0046]    The root of the root section of the forward swept rear wing  15 , in  FIG. 4 , is elevated above the aft part of the fuselage  9 . In one embodiment, this root section of the rear wing  15  is connected to the aft part of the fuselage  9  with a vertical stabilizer  22 . The root section of the forward swept rear wing  15  is slightly tapered and substantially horizontal. The wingtip of the root section of the rear wing  15  joins the root of the tip section of the rear wing  16 . This tip section  16  is slightly tapered and slightly anhedral. 
         [0047]    The wingtip of the backward swept tip section of the front wing  14  and the wingtip of the forward swept tip section of the rear wing  16  are structurally connected with a wingtip fence  21 , which is a non-tapered, backward swept non-lifting vertical wing with symmetric and horizontal airfoil. The lower front end of this wingtip fence  21  is joined to the wingtip of the tip section of the front wing  14  and its higher rear end is joined to the wingtip of the tip section of the rear wing  16 . All the structural connections between the parts of the present invention are established in a way which is understood by those skilled in the art. 
         [0048]    Having a front wing  10  as front as possible and the rear wing  11  as rear as possible as in  FIG. 3  results in a need for a longer wide-belly fuselage extension part  23 , compared to the length of the wide-belly fuselage extension  8  in  FIG. 2 , if the area ruled design method is to be applied. When the front wing sections  13  and  14  are angled, as well as the rear wing sections  15  and  16  in  FIG. 4 , the wide-belly section  24  need to be even wider in the middle, if the area ruled design method is to be applied. Designing a wider belly section of the fuselage, using the area rule method, with reference to  8  in  FIG. 2, 23  in  FIGS. 3 and 24  in  FIG. 4 , is not limited to the dimension width but rather more generally applies to a larger cross sectional area of the fuselage. 
         [0049]    Thereby, each of the method steps of (i) extending the length of the fuselage; (ii) moving the front and rear wings longitudinally as far as possible from each other; as well as (iii) introducing angled front and angled rear wings, contributes to obtain a large fuel tank, which can contain enough fuel for long range flights. At the same time, the angled front and rear wings shorten the wingtip fence  21 , as shown in  FIG. 4 , compared to the disadvantageously long wingtip fence  12 , shown in  FIG. 3 , which is the result when the front and rear wings,  10  and  11  respectively, are straight. But the wingspan problem with a really large aircraft still remains. 
         [0050]    The solution is to introduce a middle wing  25 , as shown in  FIG. 5 . The same total wing area as in  FIG. 4  can be achieved by three pairs of thin wings which are shorter, as shown in  FIG. 5 . The wingspan is reduced by approximately one third. 
         [0051]    This simple, straight middle wing  25  in  FIG. 5  is very similar to a regular wing of a monoplane aircraft but it does not have to be as massive because the load per wing is lower, the wing  25  is shorter, and the wingtip of this middle wing  25  is joined to the wingtip fence  26 , gaining an advantage from the well-known strength and stiffness of the box wing concept. This reinforcement effect is mutual. The wingtip fence  26  in  FIG. 5  is supported by this middle wing  25  as well, reducing bending, torsion and vibration on the wingtip fence  26 . 
         [0052]    The root of the middle wing  25  in  FIG. 5  is mounted to the upper middle part of the fuselage  9 . This middle wing  25 , as swept and as tapered as shown in  FIG. 5  is only one embodiment but the shape is not limited to the planform shown. However, a swept middle wing is preferable because, among other reasons, the wide-belly extension  27  of the fuselage  9  is still large enough as a fuel tank, using the area rule design method. 
         [0053]    An even more preferable embodiment of a middle wing is shown in  FIG. 6 , where the middle wing is divided into a backward swept root section  28  and two tip sections, one forward swept  29  and one backward swept  30 . The root section of the middle wing  28  is slightly tapered, substantially horizontal or slightly anhedral. The tip sections  29  and  30  are slightly tapered. 
         [0054]    The backward sweep angle  31  of the root section of the middle wing  28  is substantially the same as the forward sweep angle  32  of the forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29 , as well as the backward sweep angle  33  of the backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30 . These sweep angles,  31 ,  32  and  33 , are substantially the same as the sweep angle of the wing of a modern monoplane airliner. 
         [0055]    The wingtip of the forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29  in  FIG. 6  joins the wingtip fence  26  vertically above and horizontally behind the wingtip of the tip section of the front wing  34 . The wingtip of the backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30  joins the wingtip fence  26  vertically below and horizontally ahead the wingtip of the tip section of the rear wing  35 . The structural connection between the wingtip fence  26  and the two tip sections of the middle wing,  29  and  30 , is not limited to this particular embodiment. Using streamlined longitudinal aerodynamic bodies as structural interconnecting parts where the wingtips are connected to the wingtip fence  26 , or other different structures, established in a manner which is understood by those skilled in the art, do not depart from the scope of this invention. 
         [0056]    The root of the root section of the middle wing  28  in  FIG. 6  joins the upper part of the fuselage  9 . The preferred embodiment where the root section of the middle wing  28  joins the root of the forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29  as well as the root of the backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30  is shown in  FIG. 7 , in a partial, perspective view. Other embodiments having different structures do not depart from the scope of this invention. 
         [0057]    The root chords of the tip sections  29  and  30  in the preferred embodiment shown in  FIG. 7  have substantially the same length and this chord length is smaller than the wingtip chord of the root section of the middle wing  28 . Furthermore, the root of the backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30  is vertically elevated and horizontally further back, compared to the root of the forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29 . 
         [0058]    The reason for this solution, in this particular embodiment shown in  FIG. 7 , is to obtain a vertical and horizontal separation between the two root chords of the tip sections,  29  and  30 . At the same time, the larger chord for the wingtip of the root section of the middle wing  28  makes this root section of the middle wing  28 , by definition, stronger, which is strongly recommended because this root section  28  is a suitable place for locating engines or any other kind of propulsion with large forces on the wing structure. 
         [0059]    The embodiment in  FIG. 7  shows an elevated backward swept tip section  30 , elevated above the tip section  29  and the root section  28 , that are joined on the same, lower vertical level. The structural distance bridge in this embodiment is an embedded, structurally integrated engine housing  36 . 
         [0060]      FIG. 8  shows the same embodiment of the invention. The forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29  is anhedral, substantially as much as the tip section of the front wing  34  is dihedral. And, the forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29  is substantially as much anhedral as the backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30  is dihedral. Other embodiments having different structures do not depart from the scope of this invention. 
         [0061]      FIG. 8 , compared to  FIG. 2 , clearly shows the structural difference between the regular, conventional box wing concept and the present invention. While the closed frame structure of the prior art is formed by the front wing  3 , the rear wing  5 , the connecting wingtip fence  6 , the vertical stabilizer  7  and the fuselage  4  in  FIG. 2 , the embodiment of the invention in  FIG. 8  has three times more closed frames, which is a considerable structural reinforcement. 
         [0062]    One closed frame in  FIG. 8  is formed by the root and tip sections of the front wing,  37  and  34 , a small portion of the wingtip fence  26 , the anhedral forward swept tip section of the middle wing  29 , the root section of the middle wing  28  and the fuselage  9 . Another closed frame in the same  FIG. 8  is formed by the vertical stabilizer  22 , the root section  38  and the tip section  35  of the rear wing, a small portion of the wingtip fence  26 , the dihedral backward swept tip section of the middle wing  30 , the structural bridge  36 , the root section of the middle wing  28  and the fuselage  9 . The third closed frame is formed by the wingtip fence  26 , the forward swept and backward swept tip sections of the middle wing,  29  and  30 , and the structural bridge  36 . The other half of the embodiment, the mirror image, has also three closed frames. 
         [0063]      FIG. 9  shows a modified and preferred embodiment with two symmetric tails  39  in a V-tail configuration, instead of the single stabilizer  22  shown in  FIG. 8 . The two V-tails  39  in  FIG. 9  together with portions of both root sections of the rear wings  38  and the aft portion of the fuselage  9  form one more closed frame, compared to the number of frames in  FIG. 8 . The total number of closed frames of the embodiment in  FIG. 9  is seven, and this feature of the invention provides exceptional structural strength and stiffness for this new box wing configuration. 
         [0064]    The main part of the airflow around the aircraft of the present invention is forced to go through these frames, formed by the wing sections and other structural parts of the aircraft. The stream flow is divided into seven aerodynamic channels at the most, as shown in  FIG. 9 . This novel feature of the present invention provides substantial aerodynamic improvement. 
         [0065]    As was mentioned, the box wing aircraft configuration implicitly disclosed in RCD EM 002544510-0001 is not functional. All four engines are Ramjet-type and they cannot lift the aircraft from the runway because they need an established airflow of several hundred km/h for start.  FIG. 10  shows the solution which makes the aircraft EM 002544510-0001 functional. The two inner engines,  40  on both sides, are traditional gas turbine engines in the present invention, preferably turbofan or turboprop, which can provide the necessary airflow needed for the two outer, Ramjet-type, engines,  41  on both sides, to start after liftoff. 
         [0066]    The propulsion for the box wing aircraft of the present invention shown in  FIG. 10  is not limited to turboprop, turbofan and Ramjet-type engines. Having other kind of propulsion systems and a combination of different propulsion systems, as well as distributed propulsion, do not depart from the scope of this invention. 
         [0067]      FIG. 11  to  FIG. 15  are different views of the aircraft of  FIG. 10 , which is the perspective view of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, with combined propulsion. The front and rear views,  FIG. 11  and  FIG. 14 , are shown in enlarged scale, compared to dimensions of the side, top and bottom views,  FIGS. 12, 13 and 15  respectively. 
         [0068]    The box wing aircraft concept cannot be accepted for passenger traffic before a solution for convenient embarking and disembarking is presented. Airport boarding bridges cannot come close enough to the passenger door especially when the front wing is attached to the nose, as in the present invention. However, it is not a law of nature that we must use boarding bridges for embarking and disembarking. Very large passenger aircraft are desired and the boarding bridges are a bottleneck, box wing aircraft or not. 
         [0069]      FIG. 16  shows an Airport Shuttle Vehicle, for quick embarking-disembarking, designed with the box wing aircraft concept in mind, comprising a passenger cabin  42  with front and rear doors  43  with a surrounding frame  44 , able to absorb shocks when the cabin door  43  docks to a passenger door of the aircraft or to a door of the airport terminal building; an undercarriage  45  including but not limited to a scissor mechanism  46  for lifting the cabin  42 ; at least one foldable or expandable side support leg  47  on each side, for stability and safety reasons; and necessary sensors and equipment to operate the vehicle.  FIG. 16  shows the passenger cabin  42  in elevated position and the side support legs  47  expanded. 
         [0070]    The passenger doors of the box wing aircraft must be located in positions easily accessible for docking with such Airport Shuttle Vehicles; preferably several vehicles simultaneously docked to each passenger deck on both sides of the aircraft. Embarking and disembarking can be quick even for a large box wing airliner with more than thousand passengers, using a fleet of shuttle vehicles. Such an Airport Shuttle Vehicle has simple tasks in a controlled environment which means great opportunity for unmanned, adaptive preprogrammed operation under limited human supervision. 
         [0071]    There are similar existing mobile passenger lounges, although without side support legs; furthermore catering and cargo load vehicles, with side support legs but without passenger cabins. The patentability of this particular Airport Shuttle Vehicle is therefore limited, but this enhanced large-scale embarking-disembarking system is worth mentioning as an effort to eliminate one of the shortcomings of the box wing concept for large airliners.