Abstract:
An improved auger combustor for the incineration of refuse featuring, in its preferred embodiment, a granular substrate formed as a fluidized bed by underfire air and composed of particulate material with pollution abatement properties, an auger with expandable flights, a post combustor treatment zone comprised of particulate material with pollution abatement properties suspended in the gas stream exiting the auger combustor chamber; and in alternate embodiments, also including the ability to insert combustible fuel gases from the bottom of the combustor chamber, particularly at the input end of the combustor chamber, and/or the volumetric expansion of the combustor chamber from the input to the output end as a means of increasing retention time for gases released by the burning of refuse in the combustor chamber.

Description:
This application claims benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/162,430 filed Oct. 28, 1999. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     This invention relates generally to incinerators, and more particularly to incinerators for the combustion of heterogenous waste materials such as household and commercial refuse. In the embodiments described, it teaches the provision of a removable noncombustible granular substrate beneath the material being consumed in the primary combustion chamber/gasifier of a rotating auger incinerator to aid in the more complete diffusion of combustion air through the materials being burned, to facilitate treatment of undesirable emissions from the materials being burned, and most importantly, to act as an “air bearing” for the material being consumed and to thereby facilitate its movement through said chamber. It also teaches the provision of an auger with expandable flights in such an incinerator, the suspension of treatment particles in the gas stream leaving said combustor/gasifier, and numerous other improvements. 
     2. Prior Art in the Field 
     a) General Background Information 
     Much of the world&#39;s energy needs have been, and continue to be, filled by hydrocarbon fuels. In the past, such fuels provided a convenient, plentiful, and inexpensive energy source. The current rising costs of such fuels and concerns over the adequacy of their supply in the future has made them a less desirable energy source and has led to an intense investigation of alternative sources of energy. The ideal alternative energy source is a fuel which is renewable, inexpensive, and plentiful, with examples of such fuels being the byproducts of wood, pulp, and paper mills, and household and commercial refuse. 
     The use of such alternative energy sources is not problem-free, however, since there is reason for concern over the contents of the emissions from the combustion of such fuels as well as the environmental ramifications of acquiring and transporting the fuel and disposing of the residue of combustion. Starved-air combustors, wherein the air supplied for combustion is controlled in order to control temperature conditions (and the rates of combustion) so as to consume the fuel entirely, have proved very useful in the utilization of such alternative energy sources while simultaneously maintaining a high degree of environmental quality in emissions. Such starved-air combustors are capable of burning various types of fuel and producing significant amounts of heat which can be employed for any number of purposes including the production of process steam for use in manufacturing and in the generation of electricity. 
     Unfortunately, most starved-air combustors, as originally developed and operated, were not entirely satisfactory in consuming the combustible elements of the fuel at high throughput while not producing noxious emissions. This problem resulted, in part, from the use of such combustors to burn a wide variety of fuels, including many which were nonhomogeneous, such as household or commercial refuse. While the pollution problem can be solved to a degree by the utilization of scrubbers and other antipollution devices, such mechanisms are very expensive and their cost may militate against the use of alternative energy sources previously described. 
     b) The Auger Combustor/Gasifier 
     Many of the drawbacks of such prior art devices were overcome by the development of the auger combustor/gasifier by the inventor and others. See, U.S. Pat. No. 4,009,667 (describing the original auger combustor/gasifier utilized in the system); U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,468 (describing an incinerator control means for the system); U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,084 (describing a refuse fuel feed mechanism for the system); U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,085 (describing a flame stabilization means for the system); U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,206 (describing an afterburner for the system); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,206 (describing a hot gas recycle mechanism for use with the system). The auger combustion technology taught and described in the foregoing patents offers a cost-effective approach to clean, efficient combustion of prepared solid waste and other solid fuels. It employs a starved-air combustion technique, partially combusting or gasifying solid fuel in a primary chamber (the “combustor/gasifier”), then passing the combustible gases to an afterburner where sufficient air is added to complete combustion. 
     One of the unique features of the auger combustor/gasifier system is the variable-pitch auger. The fuel enters the combustor/gasifier at a controlled rate and is shaped into a pile by the first auger flight. It is then pushed and tumbled through the combustor/gasifier chamber by the auger. As the auger moves the fuel through this horizontal cylinder, it stirs the material to maximize exposure to the oxidizing air injected into the chamber. The pitch of the auger decreases along the path of material flow to accommodate the decrease of fuel bulk as the material combusts. This ability to manage fuel-bed configuration permits control of forced-draft combustion air to gasify nearly all the fuel without complete combustion taking place, thereby allowing the combustor/gasifier to operate at what is, for an incinerator, a uniformly moderate temperature (e.g. 1,500-1800F). 
     c) The Use of Granular Substrates 
     The combination of fuel bed stirring and air injection with precise temperature control gives the auger combustor/gasifier system several advantages over prior technology: Reliability and clean operation; high throughput; low gasifier temperature, afterburner combustion of only gaseous fuels, precise flame structure and temperature control; longer material life (refractory and auger); fully automatic control; and the ability to combust a wide variety of heterogenous solid fuels. However, it has been discovered that several of these advantages may be further strengthened by the addition of a substrate of appropriate granular materials to act as an “air bearing” in the auger combustor/gasifier chamber, to aid in the diffusion of combustion air through the material being burned, and to facilitate treatment of harmful emissions from the materials being burned. Moreover, the advantages inherent in the use of such a substrate are even further magnified by its use in conjunction with a combustor/gasifier chamber wherein the pressure of the air forced through the substrate is at its maximum at the fuel input end of the chamber and at its minimum at the output end of the chamber. 
     Granular fuels being burned in incinerators have been, in the past, formed into fluidized beds via the insertion from underneath of combustion air at appropriate pressures. In such incinerators, the granular fuel forming the fluidized bed is moved by the fluidization means or by a movable grate under the bed. The fluidization of the granular fuel aids in its combustion and its movement through the combustion chamber. However, the inventor is aware of no incinerators in which a fluidized bed acts as a substrate for the material being burned and is formed from a noncombustible material which remains generally stationary with respect to such material, acts as an “air bearing” for such material, aids in the diffusion of combustion air into and through such material, and may be utilized to help treat and eliminate undesirable emissions from the material being burned. 
     In addition to those patents enumerated above with regard to the auger combustor/gasifier, representative patents illustrating the current state of the art in the area of starved air incinerators include the following: 
     1. “Apparatus for the Combustion of Poorly Combustible Fuels” issued to Cosar (U.S. Pat. No. 4,809,620) in 1989. 
     2. “Method and Apparatus for Regulating the Furnace Output of Incineration Plants” issued to Martin (U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,477 in 1990. 
     3. “Method and Apparatus for the Efficient Combustion of a Mass Fuel” issued to Barlow (U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,288) in 1991. 
     4. “Incinerating-Fusing System for City Refuse Disposal” issued to Tsunemi et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,065 in 1992. 
     5. “Process and Apparatus for Emissions Reduction from Waste Incineration” issued to Khinkis et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,205,227 in 1993. 
     Upon review of these patents it will be found that none anticipate or render obvious the unique innovations described herein. 
     d) The Use of Expanding Auger Flights 
     The efficient and trouble-free operation of the system as a whole depends in part on the reliability of its most distinctive feature-the auger (with its water cooled hollow shaft) which is utilized to convey fuel through the combustor/gasifier. In this regard, it has been discovered that (in operation) the auger is more readily subject to failure if provision is not made for the expansion of the material making up its flights when subjected to elevated temperatures within the combustor/gasifier chamber. 
     Numerous means have been utilized in the attempt to create auger conveyors that can operate without problems at high (and possibly varying) temperatures without failure. Representative patents in this area include the following: 
     1. “Expansion Coupling for Screw Conveyors” issued to Parker (U.S. Pat. No. 1,829,453) in 1931. 
     2. “Floating Auger Flight for Conveyors” issued to Mayrath (U.S. Pat. No. 3,219,178) in 1965. 
     3. “Screw Conveyor Apparatus” issued to Christian (U.S. Pat. No. 3,637,069) in 1972. 
     4. “Temperature Expansive Screw Conveyor” issued to Millsap (U.S. Pat. No. 4,399,906) in 1983. 
     However, none of these means is suitable for use with the unique auger conveyor utilized in the auger combustor/gasifier system previously described. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 1,829,453 issued to J. N. Parker in 1931 is appropriately titled “Expansion Coupling for Screw Conveyors,” and teaches the design for an auger featuring such a coupling in its shaft. However, shaft expansion is not a problem in the instant system as the shaft is water cooled. The problem is, instead, finding a means of maintaining the distinctive configuration of the auger flights utilized in the instant system when the system is in operation (and therefore subject to the elevated temperatures within the combustor/gasifier) despite the expansion of the material making up the auger flights. 
     U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,219,178 and 3,637,069 issued to Mayrath and Christian, respectively, likewise fail to solve this problem. Both teach systems wherein the flights of the auger are, in general, slidable with respect to the shaft. Thus, the flights are enabled to expand and lengthen when exposed to elevated temperatures, but only by sacrificing the integrity of the auger&#39;s initial configuration. This is totally unacceptable in the context of the instant system as the configuration of the auger conveyor utilized, with its tapering flights, is an integral part of the system&#39;s design and must be maintained in order to guarantee the proper functioning of the system. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,399,906 issued to Millsap teaches the design for an expandable auger wherein the auger flights are attached to stakes that extend completely through the shaft and are slidable with respect thereto. Thus, as the material making up the auger flights expands, the flights are enabled to expand away from the shaft, increasing the overall diameter of the auger. This is also unsuitable in the current application. The auger flights of the auger utilized in the current application must be maintained at precise distances from the floor and sides of the combustor/gasifier. These relationships would be distorted if the diameter of the auger was allowed to expand. Further, it would be unsuitable in the current application because of the openings in the shaft that allow the penetration of the stakes therethrough. This would, in the instant application, interfere with or render impossible the water cooling of the shaft. Thus, there are no solutions provided in current or preexisting art for the flight expansion problem required to be solved for the optimum functioning of the auger utilized in the auger combustor at elevated temperatures. 
     e) Direct Suspension of Cleaning Materials in Gas Stream 
     The inventor is aware of no prior art similar to that taught herein in the field of waste incineration. However, the techniques for the suspension of particulates in a vertical gas stream are well known in the gypsum industry where vertical driers are used in the manufacturing of gypsum board. 
     f) Additional Bottom Firing at Fuel Input End 
     The use of addition fuel sources to assist in the firing and combustion of less combustible materials, such as the input of an inflammable gas stream (e.g.-propane), is well known in the field of waste incineration. The inventor is, however, not aware of any prior use of such techniques in a device of the type described herein. 
     g) Volume Expansion of Auger Combustor Interior at Output End 
     It is desirable in waste incineration to increase the residency time in the incinerator of various gases released by the incineration process. The volumetric increase of a gas channel as a means of slowing the flow of gas therethrough is well understood in the arts pertaining to fluid dynamics. The inventor is, however, not aware of any prior use of such techniques in a device of the type described herein. 
     SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION 
     The auger combustor/gasifier constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention features, as is typical for incinerators of this type, an auger that is (a) disposed in a horizontal position within the combustor/gasifier chamber in close proximity to the bottom of the chamber such that it is proximate the (b) the refractory material that covers the interior of the chamber. 
     1. Fluidized Bed and Segmentation of Combustion Chamber 
     In its most basic embodiment, the instant invention would add a layer of noncombustible granular material to the bottom of the combustor/gasifier chamber (between the auger and the bottom of the chamber), which noncombustible granular material is suspended and maintained in a substantially fluidized state by the influx/insertion of air at high pressures from below and serves as a supporting substrate for the materials being incinerated in the chamber. 
     The addition of this layer of noncombustible granular material in the form of a fluidized fuel supporting substrate has, as previously noted, several important benefits. First, it acts to provide the equivalent of an “air bearing” as the granular materials utilized for the substrate are substantially suspended or floating in the high pressure air inserted from underneath. It has been found that this substantially lowers the amount of effort/energy required (via the auger) to convey material being burned through the chamber. Second, it acts to further diffuse the air being fed from underneath the fuel burned, assisting the process of complete incineration. Third, it provides a buffer or pad between the heterogenous and often abrasive materials being incinerated and the refractory, protecting the refractory from abrasion or other damage and prolonging its useful life. Fourth, by utilizing limestone or other appropriate treatment materials for the granular substrate, this system provides a means of treating gaseous emissions from the materials incinerated, avoiding or reducing the need for other treatment means which absorb useful heat and thereby reduce profitability. 
     In its more advanced and preferred embodiment, as illustrated herein, the auger combustor/gasifier constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention also features two other improvements and innovations. First, the granular material forming the substrate is readily renewable, being readily placed and removed. Second, the pressure of air injected from underneath the granular material decreases between the fuel input end of the combustor/gasifier chamber and the output end thereof. 
     Renewability of the granular material utilized for the substrate is accomplished by inclusion of means for the ready insertion of said granular material and construction of the incinerator in such manner that the auger, which is typically suspended and held in position at opposite ends of the chamber, may be readily raised away from the floor of the gasifier chamber or lowered to a position adjacent thereto. The ability to raise and lower the auger allows the placement of the substrate of granular material utilized by this invention on the floor of the chamber (when the auger is elevated) and its ready removal from the chamber (when the auger is lowered so that its flights sweep the material from the chamber). A supplemental auger or other means is utilized to inject limestone or other substrate material into the auger combustor chamber. 
     While the desirability of providing means for the ready renewability of bed material requires no explanation and is readily understood, the objects accomplished by the injection of the air utilized to hold the granular material in suspension at diminishing pressures along the length of the chamber require reference to the auger combustor/gasifier incineration process. In this process, fuel introduced into the auger combustor/gasifier chamber is consumed/gasified as it is moved through the chamber by the auger, resulting in an ever smaller volume and weight of fuel material as it is moved from the point where it is introduced into the chamber. If air is inserted at a constant pressure from underneath the substrate for the entire length of the chamber, the pressure may be either undesirably low at the end of the chamber where fuel is injected (the “input end”) and the fuel being consumed is heaviest, or undesirably high in the opposite end of the chamber (the “output end”) where most of the fuel has been gasified and the remainder to be consumed is lightest. Thus, supplying air to the chamber at a constant pressure may be either: (a) insufficient to supply necessary oxygen and to create the desired “air bearing” effect at the input end of the chamber; or (b) it may be (if pressure is high enough to accomplish these goals at the input end of the chamber) too high in the output end of the chamber, resulting in the lifting of substrate, ash, debris and unburned fuel/refuse from the floor of the chamber and its possible dispersion into other parts of the system with potential disruptive effects. The inventor&#39;s solution to this problem is the subdivision of the auger combustor chamber into segments with each successive segment having its own plenum supplying air at successively diminishing pressures. 
     2. Auger with Expanding Flights 
     As previously noted, the auger gasifier/combustor is distinguished by an auger with a water cooled shaft and flights that are spaced from the shaft and held in position relative to the shaft by “standoffs” which extend outwardly from the shaft like spokes, but do not penetrate the shaft. Due to the extreme heat in the incinerator environment, the material that makes up the flights of the auger expands when the incinerator is in use. If means are not provided to absorb and/or counteract the expansion in each segment of the auger flights, the shape of the auger may become distorted, stress will be placed on the uprights holding the auger flights, and the system may fail or fail to perform in an optimum manner. 
     The inventor has solved these problems by dividing the flights of the auger into separate sections with each section being provided with leeway to expand only in a manner that does not distort the overall configuration of the auger. In general, each section of the auger flight is fixed to four uprights; however, these numbers may vary. Each such section is slidably attached to all but one of these uprights. Further, where sections meet, they slidably overlap. These design innovations allow the lengthwise expansion of each flight only along the spiral path dictated by the placement of the standoffs without distortion of the configuration of the auger. 
     3. Direct Suspension of Cleaning Materials in Gas Stream 
     The direct suspension of cleaning material in the gas stream leading from the incinerator to the afterburner serves to greatly enhance the cleaning of the gas stream and the removal/treatment of possible pollutants. 
     4. Addition of Bottom Firing at Fuel Input End 
     The addition of fuel sources and firing mechanisms at the input end of the auger combustor incinerator serves to greatly increase throughput when needed to maintain the pace of treating incoming waste materials and is greatly facilitated by the use of the granular fluidized bed mechanisms described herein. 
     5. Volume Expansion of Auger Combustor Interior 
     The volumetric expansion of the auger combustor chamber from input to output end is extremely useful in slowing the flow of gas therethrough, leading to increased residency time in the incinerator and a more complete break-down of various gases produced. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 provides a first side view of an auger combustor/gasifier chamber and associated systems. 
     FIG. 2 is a first cross-sectional end view of an auger combustor/gasifier chamber incorporating the improvements taught herein. 
     FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of an auger combustor/gasifier chamber illustrating its division into three sections-Section A, Section B, and Section C. 
     FIG. 4A provides a cross-sectional view related to Section A. 
     FIG. 4B provides a cross-sectional view related to Section B. 
     FIG. 4C provides a cross-sectional view related to Section C. 
     FIG. 5 provides an “opened” view of the refractory layer of the auger combustor/gasifier providing further information related to the distribution of forced-air outlets supporting the fluidized bed of the instant invention. 
     FIG. 6 provides a front view of one end of the combustor chamber illustrating the elongated opening which allows adjustment of auger height. 
     FIG. 7 provides a front view of one of the sliding plates that fit over the elongated openings in the ends of the combustor chamber. 
     FIG. 8 provides a bottom view of one the sliding plates in place over the elongated opening in the end of the combustor chamber. 
     FIG. 9 is a cross-section of the auger flight at a first attachment location illustrating the means of connection that allows the expandable auger flights of the instant invention. 
     FIG. 10 is a cross-section of the auger flight at a second attachment location further illustrating the means of connection that allows the expandable auger flights of the instant invention. 
     FIG. 11 provides a more detailed view of a slot of the type illustrated in cross-section in FIGS. 9 and 10. 
     FIG. 12 provides a schematic view from the side of an auger combustor with volumetric expansion. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     1. Fluidized Bed and Segmented Combustor Chamber 
     Turning first to FIGS. 1 and 2, it will be seen that the combustor/gasifier chamber (hereinafter referred to as the “combustion chamber” and denoted generally by arrow  10 ) of a rotary auger incinerator produced in accordance with the teachings of this invention may be generally described as a hollow, horizontally disposed stationary cylinder. It has an inlet end  11  accessed by a shaft  12  through which combustible refuse is fed from a feed hopper (not shown). It likewise has an output end  13  connected to an exhaust conduit  14  which feeds the top of an afterburner (not shown). The combustion chamber  10  also includes air supply means  15  for supplying underfire air for combustion purposes. This air may be provided by the same blower (not shown) which supplies air to the afterburner. Alternatively, a separate blower or blowers may be provided to supply underfire air and air to the afterburner. 
     Extending the length of the combustion chamber is a rotatable auger (denoted generally by arrow  16 ) having a tubular axis  17  supported at the inlet end  11  by a bearing mounted to the front wall and at the outlet end by another bearing mounted to the rear wall, and driven by a hydraulic motor. The spiral flights  23  of the auger  16  extend from the front wall to the outlet end  13 , so that when the auger  16  is rotated, the auger flights  23  will convey combustible refuse entering inlet end  11  from the feed hopper through the combustion chamber  10 , and deliver the solid residue to the ash receptacle  21  at outlet end  13  where it can be removed via removal auger  22 . The pitch of the auger flight  23  is greatest at the inlet end  11 , and becomes gradually less toward the outlet end  13 , to compensate for the reduction in volume of the refuse which takes place during combustion. The tubular axis  17  was, in prior embodiments, positioned off-center of the axis of the combustion chamber  10  so that there was minimum clearance between the outer edge of the auger flights and the bottom of the combustion chamber  10 , to assure movement of essentially all of the refuse through the combustion chamber  10 . In the embodiments illustrated, the tubular axis  17  can be raised (as shown) to allow the positioning and maintenance of a granular substrate (denoted generally by arrow  18 ) along the bottom of combustion chamber  10 . Conversely, it can be lowered to the position typical of prior combustion chambers to sweep the granular substrate (or some portion thereof) from the bottom of combustion chamber  10 . 
     The fuel bed (denoted generally by arrow  20 ) is at its greatest depth at the inlet end  11  of the combustion chamber and is conveyed from the inlet end  11  to the outlet end  13 . During its travel through the combustion chamber, the fuel bed  20  gradually decreases in size as its contents are combusted and combustion gases evolved. As is typical of prior embodiments, conduits  23  supply underfire air to the combustion chamber beneath the bed of fuel  20  such that the underfire air, when at an elevated temperature, contributes to the ignition of the fuel in fuel bed  20  by heating and drying the fuel. 
     The walls of the combustion chamber include underfire air plenums  19 A,  19 B, and  19 C, each of which is coupled to one of the air supply conduits  15 . Air passes from the plenums  19 A,  19 B, and  19 C through the underfire air conduits  15 A embedded in refractory layer  25  to a plurality of ports or injectors (denoted generally by arrows  26 ) communicating with the combustion chamber from beneath granular substrate  18  and fuel  20 . The plenums  19 A,  19 B, and  19 C are separated from each other by stops or gaskets to define multiple underfire combustion zones/sections A, B, and C. Additional details related to the construction of sections A, B, and C, and the distribution of injectors  26  can be derived from review of FIGS. 3,  4 A,  4 B,  4 C, and  5 . As will be noted, the rotation of the auger  16  within the combustion chamber  10  results in the fuel bed  20  being swept somewhat to the side and oriented as shown in FIGS. 4A,  4 B and  4 C. These three sections may optimally be constructed with approximate equal lengths and with approximately the same number of injectors  26  per square inch. (In the embodiment illustrated the injectors are set in a grid pattern approximately 1.5 to 2 inches apart). The total number of injectors in combustion chamber  10  would, therefore, be approximately 1,200 in the embodiment illustrated. (only a small number of injectors are illustrated in the drawing figures to avoid overcrowding of same). 
     As illustrated in FIGS. 4A,  4 B,  4 C and  5  the off-center distribution of fuel bed  20  in combustion chamber  10  makes a similarly off-center distribution of injectors  26  advantageous for the purpose of supporting the granular substrate  18  and fuel bed  20 . Injectors  26  are disposed across an initial arc (indicated by bracket I in FIG. 5) of approximately 180 degrees. The width of the area containing injectors  26  narrows as it moves from its start in Section A to its terminus in Section C. Injectors are disposed across a final arc (indicated by bracket II in FIG. 5) of only approximately 50 degrees. Likewise, just as the decreasing area of the fuel bed  20  makes it advantageous to decrease the area containing injectors  26  in moving from the inlet end  11  to the outlet end  13 , the decreasing weight of fuel bed  20  makes it advantageous to decrease the pressure of the air supplied through injectors  26  as the fuel bed  20  is moved from inlet end  11  to outlet end  13 . In the embodiment illustrated, it has been found that a pressure of 10″ (H2O or water column) in Section A, a pressure of 4″ in Section B, and a pressure of 2″ in Section C, is optimal for most purposes. However, these settings may be adjusted upward for heavier waste materials and downward for lighter fuel materials. Likewise, when dealing with materials that are saturated with volatiles that will evaporate fairly easily, it may be necessary to make adjustments upward in Section A while making very little adjustment in Section C. Obviously, the system illustrated, which provides leeway for the independent adjustment of pressure in a plurality of sections, makes a variety of patterns possible in order to achieve optimal results. 
     FIGS. 6,  7 , and  8 , illustrate the means for raising and lowering auger  16  utilized in the preferred embodiment. In prior art embodiments of the auger/combustor, the tubular axis  17  of auger  16  penetrates the end walls of the auger/combustor and is mounted thereon using bushings in a manner well known in the mechanical arts. In the preferred embodiment illustrated, the sections of the end walls  27  penetrated by tubular axis  17  are replaced by plates  28  which are held adjacent to the end walls  27  by brackets  29 . Plates  28  may be raised and lowered via set screws  30 . The tubular axis  17  is approximately 12 inches in diameter. In the preferred embodiment the aperture  27 A in each end wall  27  is approximately 12 inches in diameter (to match tubular axis  17 ), but is 18 inches in height. This allows the flights  23  of auger  16  to sweep all materials from the combustor chamber  10  when the tubular axis  17  is placed at its lowest setting while providing up to six inches of clearance for the placement of the fluidized bed characteristic of this invention. The granular substrate  18  may be placed or refurbished via substrate placement auger  31 . 
     2. Auger with Expanding Flights 
     As previously noted, rotatable auger  16  has a tubular axis  17  and is supported at the inlet end  11  by a bearing mounted to the front wall and at the outlet end  13  by another bearing mounted to the rear wall. It extends the length of the combustion chamber  10 . The pitch of the auger flights  23  is greatest at the inlet section A, and becomes gradually less through the middle section B, further decreasing in the outlet section C, to compensate for the reduction in volume of the refuse which takes place during combustion. 
     The auger flights  23  are comprised of individual segments which are joined together and concentrically spaced from the tubular auger shaft  17  by a plurality of support members  44 , so that an open annular space  46  is formed between the inner edge  48  of the auger flights  23  and the auger shaft  17 . This open space  46  allows air to freely move upward through the combustion chamber  10  as well as along the auger shaft  28  to the outlet section C. Different materials having different heat resistant characteristics can be used in forming these sections of the auger flights  23 . For example, in the inlet portion, where there is little heat, carbon steel could be used, while stainless steel or a refractory alloy could be used in the rest of the combustion chamber  10 . 
     Rivets  45  penetrate each upright  44 . Auger flights  23  of 360 degrees are each fixed to four successive uprights  44  via rivets  45 , but only rigidly attached to one (the first or leading upright). Slots (denoted by arrow  47 ) enable each flight  23  to be slidably attached to the remaining uprights  44 . Each section of flight  23  is anchored at its leading edge, but secured by slots  47  to three remaining uprights. The slots  47  for each section of flight  23  become longer at each successive upright  44  following the upright  44  to which that section of the flight  23  is anchored to allow for the continuing expansion/lengthening of the section of flight  23  throughout its length. FIG. 11, in which line  51  would be perpendicular to an upright  44  illustrates the slight outward canting of slots  47  to allow for some slight outward expansion of the flights  23  when heated. 
     The materials used to make up flights  23  may vary. However, if the material chosen typically expands by X % per foot at the operating temperatures of t he combustor, it will be necessary to lengthen the next slot  47  after the leading upright  44  by an amount “L” equal to the circumferential distance between this slot  47  and the rivet  45  in the leading upright  44  times X %. The next slot  47  will have a length equal to twice this amount. The third slot will have a length equal to three times this amount. The distance allowed for outward expansion “W” will, however, remain constant for all of the slots, being equal to X % times the distance between rivet  45  and annular space  46 . 
     3. Direct Suspension of Cleaning Materials in Gas Stream 
     This innovation allows the treatment of the gas stream leaving an incinerator/gasifier by cleaning material particles (denoted generally by arrow  50 ), which may advantageously be comprised of limestone or other cleaning materials, suspended in the segment between the incinerator/gasifier and the afterburner. It is accomplished by the flaring or volume expansion of one part of a portion of exhaust conduit  14 . The expanded segment (denoted generally as  14 A) results in a slowing of the movement of gas through this segment (allowing time for intermixing and treatment with suspended particles). This expansion produces a rate of movement in the gas stream that is sufficient to counterbalance the pull of gravity on the cleaning material particles  50  injected into the segment while at the same time not being sufficient to simply push them into the afterburner. This results in the suspension of the treatment material particles  50  in the gas flow from the incinerator/gasifier and creates an optimum treatment environment. As treatment materials  50  build up they will eventually reduce the available volume in the expanded segment  14 A, increasing the velocity and/or pressure of the gas stream. This will result in the sweeping of part of the treatment materials  50  into the afterburner. The particles in the expanded segment  50  can, in this manner be periodically refurbished using a supplemental injector such as an auger (not shown). This auger may advantageously be mounted at expanded segment  14 A, but may also be mounted below same where exhaust gases from the combustor chamber  10  will sweep particles  50  up into the expanded segment  14 A. 
     4. Addition of Bottom Firing at Fuel Input End 
     The use of additional fuel sources (e.g.-propane) at the input end  11  of the combustion chamber  10  can be easily accomplished utilizing separate dedicated uderfire fuel injectors  60  for this purpose. As the fuel bed  20  is tumbled by augur  16  the material making up same is continually rolled under. Thus, by way of example, the material adjacent to the 200 degree mark in FIG. 4A will be rolled under toward the 180 degree mark in FIG.  4 A. This process continues through the sequence illustrated in FIGS. 4B and 4C. The injection of firing fuel sources at or adjacent to this leading edge (i.e.—along the line running in FIG. 5 from 270 degrees at I to 190 degrees at II) allows the fired bed materials to be rolled under to where they have direct access to underfire air from injectors  26 . From this position the flames from these fired bed materials also can infiltrate and help to initiate the burning of other bed materials located above injectors  26 . 
     A further alternative is to add such uderfire fuel injectors  60  among injectors  26  under fuel bed  20 . In this case, the injection of combustible materials through and via a granular bed acts to further disperse the fuel and improve the burning of the fuel bed  20  thereby. In this regard, it may be compared to the use of a granular bed in the typical propane fueled backyard cooker between flame and foodstuffs as a means of dispersing heat and improving performance. The injection of combustible materials via the fluidized bed  18  provides even further improvements in the dispersion and efficiency with which the underfiring takes place. 
     5. Volume Expansion of Auger Combustor Interior 
     FIG. 12 provides a schematic view of an auger combustor chamber (indicated generally by arrow  100 ) that expands as it moves from Section A at the input end  11 , through Section B intermediate the inlet end  11  and the outlet end  13 , to Section C at the output end  13 . As is evident from review of FIG. 12, this expansion requires a similar adjustment of the auger  16 . 
     CONCLUSION 
     Further information and details may be derived from the claims for examination that follow and from the somewhat more comprehensive listing of possible claims set forth in Exhibit A, attached.