Abstract:
The present invention relates to a method for identifying target regions existing in the interface of monomers constituting the PiIT protein with the view to design molecules potentially applicable in impairing the activity of this protein, thus controlling infectious processes. The method is characterized in (i) selecting at least one amino acid sequence constituting the PiIT monomer; (ii) developing a three-dimensional computational model of the PiIT homo-hexameric structure; (iii) analyzing and determining, with computer aid, the interface-forming residues (IFR) and their physicochemical and structural characteristics for all the chains of the models of hexameric complexes generated; (iv) selecting the regions to be used as therapeutic targets (and preferred therapeutic targets) in the interface between the monomers based on the intensity of determined parameters; (v) computer-aided design of molecules potentially capable of effecting bindings and/or interactions between target regions of the monomers. Markedly, some of the main applications of this technology consist in combating the bacteria  Xylella fastidiosa , an etiologic agent of the Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC or “Amarelinho”), and Pierce&#39;s disease.

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    The present application relates to a method for identifying target regions existing in the interface of monomers constituting the PiIT protein with a view to design molecules that are potentially applicable in impairing the activity of this protein, thus controlling infectious processes. Markedly, one of the main applications of this technology consists in combating the bacteria  Xylella fastidiosa , an etiological agent of Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC or “Amarelinho”) and Pierce&#39;s disease. 
       PRIOR ART 
       [0002]    A  Xylella fastidiosa  is a gram-negative and non-flagellated bacterium that causes various diseases on plants, such as Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC), popularly known as “amarelinho” and the Pierce&#39;s disease, which affects the citriculture viniculture, respectively. The  Xylella fastidiosa  microorganism is limited to persist colonizing the xylem vessel, the vesses that conduct water and salts in plants, and in the anterior digestive tract of some insects, as those popularly known as “cigarrinhas” (hoppers) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), which feeds on plant sap and serve as vectors for carrying and inserting bacteria into plants (Hopkins, D. L., e A. H. Purcell. 2002.  Xylella fastidiosa : cause of Pierce&#39;s disease of grapevine and other emergent diseases. Plant Dis. 86:1056-1066). Ever since years ago one has been testing the use of insecticide against the vector-insects of this bacterium, but there has been on sufficient efficacy, and the summed damages for the year 2000, resulting from the Pierce&#39;s disease, in the state of California, USA, have reached 14 billion dollars (see document US 2005/0257285). The virulence mechanisms of  Xylella fastidiosa  and the manner in which it interacts with the host plants are not totally known. However, the most plausible explanation is the formation of aggregates like biofilms which, upon colonizing the xylem, cause a blockage of the sap flow and culminates in the symptoms of the disease (Hopkins, D. L. 1989. Xylem limited bacterial pathogen of plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:271-290; Newman, K. L., R. P. P. Almeida, A. H. Purcell, and S. E. Lindow. 2003. Use of a green fluorescent strain for analysis of  Xylella fastidiosa  colonization of  Vitis vinifera . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:7319-7327). 
         [0003]    Hopkins and co-workers suggested that the colonization and pathogenicity of the  Xylella fastidiosa  bacterium, which lead to the Pierce&#39;s disease, are strictly related to its capability of moving within the elements of the xylem vessel, which enables the colonization of other regions of the plant. Besides, it is known that the virulent and attenuated strains rarely move from the inoculation point (Hopkins, D. L. 1989. Xylem-limited bacterial pathogen of plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:271-290). 
         [0004]    The genoma Project of  Xylella fastidiosa  disclosed the presence of genes that encode proteins involved in giogenesis and the function of type IV pili (T4P) (Yespson, A. J. G., F. C. Reinach, P. Arruda, F. A. Abreu, M. Acencio, R. Alvarenga, L. M. C. Alves, J. E. Araya, G. S. Baia, C. S. Baptista, M. H. Barros, E. D. Bonaccorsi, S. Bordin, J. M. Bove, M. R. S. Briones, M. R. P. Bueno, A. A. Camargo, L. E. A. Camargo, D. M. Carraro, H. Carrer, N. B. Colauto, C. Colombo, F. F. Costa, M. C. R. Costa, C. M. Costa-Neto, L. L. Coutinho, M. Cristofani, E. Dias-Neto, C. Docena, H. EI-Dorry, A. P. Facincani, A. J. S. Ferreira, V. C. A. Ferreira, J. A. Ferro, J. S. Fraga, S. C. Franca, M. C. Franco, M. Frohme, L. R. Furlan, M. Garnier, G. H. Goldman, M. H. S. Goldman, S. L. Gomes, A. Gruber, P. L. Ho, J. D. Hoheisel, M. L. Junqueira, E. L. Kemper, J. P. Kitajima, J. E. Krieger, E. E. Kuramae, F. Laigret, M. R. Lambais, L. C. C. Leite, E. G. M. Lemos, M. V. F. Lemos, S. A. Lopes, C. R. Lopes, J. A. Machado, M. A. Machado, A. Madeira, H. M. F. Madeira, C. L. Marino, M. V. Marques, E. A. L. Martins, E. M. F. Martins, A. Y. Matsukuma, C. F. M. Menck, E. C. Miracca, C. Y. Miyaki, C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello, D. H. Moon, M. A. Nagai, A. Nascimento, L. E. S. Netto, A. Nhani, F. G. Nobrega, L. R. Nunes, M. A. Oliveira, M. C. de Oliveira, R. C. de Oliveira, D. A. Palmieri, A. Paris, B. R. Peixoto, G. A. G. Pereira, H. A. Pereira, J. B. Pesquero, R. B. Quaggio, P. G. Roberto, V. Rodrigues, A. J. D. Rosa, V. E. de Rosa, R. G. de Sa, R. V. Santelli, H. E. Sawasaki, A. C. R. da Silva, A. M. da Silva, F. R. da Silva, W. A. Silva, J. F. da Silveira, 2000. The genoma sequence of the plant pathogen  Xylella fastidiosa . Nature 406:151-157), que podem gerar mobilidade do tipo “Twitching motility” (Meng, Y., Li, Y., Galvani, C. D., Hao, G., Turner, J. N., Burr, T. J. &amp; Hoch, H. C. 2005. Upstream migration of  Xylella fastidiosa  via pilus-driven twitching motility. J Bacteriol 187, 5560-5567). “Twitching motility” is a form of movement associated to the surface, by which the bacteria pull themselves rapidly along the surfaces through polymerization and depolymerization cycles of the Pilus (T4P) (Skerker, J. M. &amp; Berg, H. C. 2001. Direct observation of extension and retraction of type IV pili. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 6901-6904). The energi necessary for the movement is supplied by means of hydrolysis of ATP by proteins called PiIB and PiIT for mounting and dismounting the Pilus, respectively. The loss of function of the Pilus protein or of PiIB results in the absence of this type of motility, coupled to deprival of extension or retraction of the pilus (Whitchurch, C. B., Hobbs, M., Livingston, S. P., Krishnapillai, V. &amp; Mattick, J. S. 1991. Characterisation of a  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  twitching motility gene and evidence for a specialized protein export system widespread in eubacteria. Gene 101, 33-44). 
         [0005]    Satyshur et al. 2007 (K. A. Satyshur, G. A. Worzalla, L. S. Meyer, E. K. Heiniger, K. G. Aukema, A. M. Misic, and K. T. Fore. Crystal Structures of the Pilus Retraction Motor PiIT Suggest Large Domain Movements and Subunit Cooperation Drive Motility. Structure 15, 363-376. March 2007) carried out the structural characterization of the retraction motor of the pilus, PiIT. These authors have resolved, by X-ray, four three-dimensional structures of PiIT proteins (codes PDB: 2GSZ, 2EWV, 2EWW and 2EYU) of a hypertermophyle,  Aquifex aeolicus . PiIT is na hexameric ATPase of a subgroup of the “bacterial type II/type IV secretion systems”, and has two large structural domains: the domain N-terminal (NTD) and the domain C-Terminal (CTD), which contains the ATPásico nucleus. Additionally, one demonstrated the remarkable importance of polar and carried interactions in the interfaces CTDn: NTDn+1 (1157 Å 2 , of the 1782 Å 2  of the total interface area is supplied by the polar and carried residues) for the function of the PiIT. Through the site-directed mutagenesis in  Pseudomonas aeruginosa , they demonstrated that some residues are crucial to the function of the protein, half of them being located in the interface region (D29, R95 e R207) and pointed out the importance thereof to the proper functioning of the protein. The paper further mentions that this clarification is of the utmost importance to the development of tools that can prevent the spread of infectious diseases in animals and plants, caused by pathogens:  Ralstonia solanacearum , cause agent of the moko or bacterial wilt on solanaceae plants (Kang, Y., Liu, H., Genin, S., Schell, M. A., and Denny, T. P. 2002).  Ralstonia solanacearum  requires type 4 pili to adhere to multiple surfaces and for natural transformation and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 427-437.),  Pseudomonas syringae  (there are more than 50 pathovars that act as pathogenic agents on various plants) (Hirano, S. S. e C.D. Upper. Bacteria in the Leaf Ecosystem with Emphasis on  Pseudomonas syringae —a Pathogen, Ice Nucleus, and Epiphyte. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64 624-653. 2000),  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  (an opportunist pathogen on human beings an also causes infections on plants such as basil ( Ocimum basilicum ) and lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) (Rahme, L. G., Stevens, E. J., Wolfort, S. F., Shao, J., Tompkins, R. G., Calderwood, S. B., Ausube, I F. M. 1995. Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science 268: 1899-1902),  Neisseria meningitidis e Neisseria gonorrhoeae  (important compulsory pathogens of humane mucous membranes, the first one causing cause agent of meningitis and the second one causing gonorrhea) (Merz, A. J., and So, M. Interactions of pathogenic Neisseriae with epithelial cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 423-457. 2000.; Pujol, C., Eugene, E., Marceau, M., e Nassif, X. 1999. The meningococcal PiIT protein is required for induction of intimate attachment to epithelial cells following pilus-mediated adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4017-4022). Other important pathogens also meke use of the motility of the “twitching” type through pilus of type IV, like  Dichelobacter nodosus , which causes pododermatitis in bovines and  Vibrio cholerae , na important humane pathogen, which causes cholera (J. S. Mattick. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002; 56:289-314. Epub 2002 Jan. 30. Review). In addition to these,  Xanthomonas axonopodis  pv citri, another very important bacterium for citriculture, because it causes citrus canker, also having pilus type IV(Yang, Y. C., Chou, C. P., Kuo, T. T., Lin, S. H., Yang, M. K. PiIR enhances the sensitivity of  Xanthomonas axonopodis  pv. citri to the infection of filamentous bacteriophage Cf. Curr Microbiol. 2004 April; 48(4):251-61). 
         [0006]    Recently, another paper by the same group that published the PiIT structure of  A. Aeolicus , resolved other tree-dimensional structures of PiIT protein, but of  Pseudomonas aeruginosa , a bacterium that is phylogenetically closer to  X. fastidiosa  with respect to  A. aeolicus . The new structures are of patial complexes, one attached to an analog of type ATP, AMP-PCP (code PDB: 3jvv) and not attached (code PDB: 3jvu), and suggested functioning mechanisms of the motor-protein that is considered the strongest biologic motor known in (A. M. Misic, K. A. Satyshur, K. T., Forest.  P. aeruginosa  PiIT structures with and without nucleotide reveal a dynamic type IV pilus retraction motor. J Mol Biol. 2010 Jul. 30; 400(5):1011-21. Epub 2010 June). 
         [0007]    These structures show complexes that would be structurally closer than one believes that the PiIT complexes of  X. fastidiosa  are, and point out that this is an extremely dynamic protein and has certain structural differences when attached to ADP, ATP or without ligands. 
         [0008]    At present, important advances in the production of pharmaceuticals were achieved by computer-aided approaches. The high damages resulting from the phitopathologies that  Xylella fascidiosa  and the absence of effective solutions against this ailment stimulate us to seek new alternatives and therapeutic targets other than those used at present for combating this microorganism. Therefore, this paper describes an attempt to innovate, in the sense of carrying out new targets for structure-based drug design, in a protein not yet used for this purpose, namely PiIT. 
         [0009]    Anderson (A. C. Anderson. The process of structure-based drug design. Chem Biol. 2003 September; 1090:787-97. 2003), published a description of how one should carry out the procedure of drug design based on protein structure, from the criteria that should be adopted for choosing the therapeutic target for such a design to the development procedures, “docking” and “virtual screening”. The paper discusses that the design of antimicrobial drugs should be based on targets that are essential, are found chiefly in pathogens (in opposition to non-pathogenic organisms), have a single function in the pathogen and are likely to undergo inhibition by small molecules. 
         [0010]    The choice of PiIT and, more specifically, of the residues to be used as targets, followed these recommendations. It is a protein essential to the  Xylella fastidiosa  pathogenicity. It is known that the movement via IV-type pilus is the main responsible for the dispersion of the pathogen since the inoculation point and development of the disease; it is important for other pathogens in terms of movement, formation of aggregates, adhesion and evasion of host immunologic system (J. S. Mattick. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002; 56:289-314. Epub 2002 Jan. 30. Review) and the residues described hereinafter, chosen as the preferred targets, have occurrence limited to the PiITs from pathogenic organisms structured with respect to the free-life organism like cyanobacteria. As already mentioned, it is known that, upon mutation of some amino acids located in the interface, the PiIT ceased exerting its function and the mutated organism was not capable of moving (“Twitching motility” (K. a. Satyshur, G. A. Worzalla, L. S. Meyer, E. K. Heiniger, K. G. Aukema, A. M. Misic, and K. T. Fore. Crystal Structures of the Pilus Retraction Motor PiIT Suggest Large Domain Movements and Subunit Cooperation Drive Motility. Structure 15, 363-376. March 2007). Therefore, we start from the presupposition that that the interfaces are essential to maintain the function and motility, and that the creation of a compound that is capable of attaching to this region will prevent this correct functioning and/or prevent the correct association of the monomers at the moment of forming the hexamer. 
         [0011]    There are a number of scientifically recognized papers that have used techniques similar to those employed in this paper, aiming at a better understanding of the protein structures and/or the identification of therapeutic targets for the development of drugs. Hereinafter, one exposes a number of citations of some of these papers. 
         [0012]    Li et al. 1996 (R. Li, X. Chen.; B. Gong, P. M. Seizer, Z. Li, E. Davidson, G. Kurzban, R. E. Miller, E. O. Nuzum, J. H. McKerrow, R. J. Fletterick, S. A. Gillmor C. S. Craik, I. D. Kuntz, F. E. Cohen and G. L. Kenyon. Structure-Based Design of Parasitic Protease Inhibitors. Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistpy 1996, 4, No. 9, 1421-1427) exploited the use of known similar protein structures, in order to develop possible candidates to drugs to be used, not only against parasites, but also against other infectious diseases and process of unknown cell multiplication. The authors further advocate that the structure-based design identifies favorable and non-favorable interactions between a potential inhibitor and a determined target. 
         [0013]    Sheng et al. 2004 (Sheng, C., Zhang, W., Zhang, M., Song, Y., Ji, H., Zhu, J., Yao, J., Yu, J., Yang, S., Zhou, Y., Zhu, J., Lu, J. Homology Modeling of Lanosterol 14α-Demethylase of  Candida albicans  and  Aspergillus fumigatus  and Insights into the Enzyme-Substrate Interactions. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2004; August; 22(1):91-99) present the use of a protein structure of  Mycobacterium tuberculosis  (14alpha-sterol demethylase) as template for modelling the three-dimensional lanosterol protein straucture 14alpha-demethylase of other microorganisms, in this case: Candida albicans and  Aspergillus fumigatus.    
         [0014]    Marrone et al. 1997 (T. J. Marrone, J. M. Briggs, and J. A. McCammon. STRUCTURE-BASED DRUG DESIGN: Computational Advances. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1997 37:71-90) presented a review with the structure-based computer methods showing the use thereof to discover, refine or alter therapeutic alteration. The review cites various, such as molecular viewing, molecular modeling, modeling techniques using 3-D databanks, methods of fragmenting and disturbing the free energy. 
         [0015]    In document WO200135316, a computational method was described for selecting drugs, based on polymorphism, which comprises obtaining more than one amino acid sequence from the target proteins that are the product of a gene exhibiting polymorphism, wherein the sequences represent different genetic polymorphisms and the generation of variations of 2-d protein structural models; computational tests of molecular drug docking with the target protein models were carried out; energetic refinement of the docked complexes; determination of the binding interaction between the drug or potential 15 new molecules candidate to drug and their respective models; selection of drug therapies based on the drug or drugs with greater binding potential/interaction with the varying structural models. 
         [0016]    Document WO9425860 described a computational system for modeling the three-dimensional structure of a model protein, this modeling being based on the three-dimensional structure of a template protein, in the amino acid sequence of the model protein, in the proteins containing the plurality of the amino acids, in each amino acid having a main atom chain and side atom chains, in each atom in a three-dimensional structure containing a determined positioning. 
         [0017]    In document U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,230, a computational system was described for generating a collection of information relating to the position between pairs of amino acids for use in modeling an oral three-dimensional structure of a varying region of a model protein. The computational system has information about the relative positions between pairs of amino acids of varying regions of a protein collection. 
         [0018]    In document WO2006110064, a method was described for selecting potential medicinal compounds and drug design, which comprises predicting values of the binding affinity or of the interaction energy released from the protein-ligand interaction from a calculated score. 
         [0019]    In document US2001000807, a computational method was described for identifying binding targets in proteins and other macromolecules. The invention includes an algorithm for predicting binding targets in proteins. In spite of requiring knowledge of the protein structure, the algorithm does not need the location, nature of the binding sites or of the ligands. The binding targets in the protein are identified and classified according to the optimum expected affinity. This invention has a significant application in designing structure-based drugs. 
         [0020]    In document U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,723, a method was described for identifying at least one unknown active domain in a known region of amino acids sequence of a correlated polypeptide, containing similarity, of natural occurrence. The polypeptide containing the parenthood relationship should have it biological activity pre-defined. And the active domain under identification should be capable of interacting with the same target of the correlated polypeptide, in an active form, the interaction of which is responsible for its biologic activity. 
         [0021]    In document US2005123995, a method was described with a computational design code for evaluating the release of binding energy between residues of polypeptide amino acids. In making use of the canonic sampling properties, a basis for the technology, the affinity for binding filaments in the proximities of each protein residue may be efficiently calculated. The binding volume associated to each pair of fragments-residue is estimates on the basis of yesple proximity criteria and an affinity mapping of the protein surface may be obtained thin this way. The analysis of such data for various types of fragment provides valuable information for helping to identify binding sites of the protein, as well as to identify key fragments that may be used for constructing potential drugs. 
         [0022]    In document WO0135316 a method was described, based on drug design computation, based on genetic polymorphism. Such a method comprises obtaining more than one amino acid sequence of the target protein, generation of three-dimensional models of the protein structure and their variants, design of drug candidates, modification of drugs existing on the basis of the prediction of the molecular interaction between the models and the candidate drugs, with their respective variations. 
         [0023]    In document US2005257285, an antimicrobial chimeric protein was described for the therapeutic and prophylactic treatment of plant diseases causes by  Xylella fastidiosa . The antimicrobial protein is composed by a polypeptide domain of surface recognition, capable of binding to components of the bacterial membrane, fused to a polypeptide domain of bacterial lysis, capable of affecting the lysis or rupture of the bacterial membrane. Particularly, the method and composition for the treatment of Pierce&#39;s disease are provided. The method for generating the transgenic  Vitus vinefera  plant, expressing the chemeric protein in the xylem is also presented. 
         [0024]    In document US2005053584, the introduction of a strain with lower virulence was described, defined as “benign”, of  X. tastidiosa  in the plants of interest which are usually susceptible to the infectious disease caused by this pathogen. The inoculated plants are generally resistant to Pierce&#39;s disease, at least about 3-4 years. The invention further presents the bacterial “benign” strain suitable for controlling the Disease, besides providing reinforcement injections (Booster) for every 3-4 years. 
         [0025]    In document WO2006069160, a construct was described which comprises a nucleic acid molecule coding for a type HecA recombinant hemaglutinin, or a fragment thereof, which imparts resistance to the infection by  Xylella fastidiosa  when expressed in plants. 
         [0026]    In document MXNL06000034, an anti- Xylella fastidiosa  substance was described, which was developed by joining an avian csFy and a Cecropin P1 (CP1) lytic peptide, which is expressed in a bacteriophase M13. This bacteriophase is capable or removing 100% of the bacterium in in-vitro cultures at a concentration of 3.6×10 5  phages/cell after 28 hours of incubation. 
         [0027]    In document U.S. Pat. No. 6,548,265, a method was described for treatment and/or prophylaxis of infectious diseases caused by bacteria which adhere to the tissues through the pilus. The method is based on the interaction with periplasmatic molecular chaperones, thus interfering with the assembly of the pilus, preventing or decreasing the bacterial infection. However, this method does not include the type-IV pilus (used for twitching motility of the pathogens like  Xylella fastidiosa ), since this system does not require chaperones for the correct assembly and functioning. 
         [0028]    In document US 2003/0176662, a procedure was described for designing structure-based drugs, from a C hepatitis protein structure. The authors did onto present any pharmaceutical structure, but suggested the targets and, on the basis of this identification, suggested the “de novo design” of the drugs that obey the phamacophore determinants found in the concentrated target in a determined amino acid of protein structure disclosed. 
         [0029]    In document US2005/0004766, a procedure was described for use of structures obtained by homology modeling, using the polymorphic protein sequences, for designing patient-specific drugs. In this patent, one can see that the authors do not report any pharmaceutical for the modeled structures, but describe in details how to obtain the structural models and how to proceed with the identification of the targets for the rational design of drugs. 
         [0030]    The present patent application relates to a new alternative to the present processes and researches that aim at eradicating/inactivating the photophatogenic  Xylella fastidiosa  strains. There are various successful cases of computational design of drugs, directed to structurally delimited therapeutic targets, as can be seen in the article by Villoutreix and co-workers (Villoutreix, B. O., Eudes, R., Miteva, Ma. A. Structure-based virtual screening: recent success stories. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. December; 12(10):1000-16). The present description of novel therapeutic targets corresponding to pharmaceuticals, carried out for interface regions of the hexameric PiIT protein, is different from the techniques already presented, because this is a novel therapeutic target, unexploited so far for this purpose, the PiIT protein, in a specific and little-studied region in the science of computational design of drugs (interface amino acids), which will aim at preventing the formation of the hexameric complex and/or its destabilization with concomitant inhibition of the motility of the bacterium. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0031]    The invention relates to identification of specific regions in protein PiIT, so that it can be inactivated or its activity can be reduced, thus reducing or preventing the development of bacterial infection. The protein in question is related to the motility of the pathogen and is described in the literature as being essential to the development of phitopathogenies correlated to the above-mentioned pathogen. The main phitopathogenies correlated to this bacteria are Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC, called also “Amarelinho”) and Pierce&#39;s disease, which can attack the citrus cultivars in general and of grapevine respectively, besides other various diseases that affect other plants of economic interest. The importance of combating these diseases is pointed out for its capability of rapid zoocoric spread, having the “cigarrinha” ( Hemiptera : Cicadellidae) as its main vector, and for its negative impact on the cultivars. 
         [0032]    A method was developed for identifying therapeutic targets in residues forming interface (IFR) between the monomeric polypeptides that constitute the hexamers of PiIT protein in three possible conformations (bound to ATP, ADP and without ligands), by modeling three hexameric template complexes in different conformations. The templates used for such modeling were the structure of  A. aerolicus  PiITs (herein called AaPiIT) bound to ADP and two structures of  P. aeruginosa  (PaPiIT) bound to ATP, and no ligand and deposited on the PDB (Protein Databank). Subsequently, one predicted residues located on the interface, their characteristics, and analysis of Computational Biology to indicate target sites for the design of drugs based on the structures generated from  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT (herein called XfPiIT). Then, one proposed a detailed description of how one should carry out the computational design of drugs that will bind to the predicted target sites. As a complement of this description, one proposed a practical example with drugs which we designed on the base of determinants of binding to the identified target, in this case centered on the Glu89 amino acid, having a very strong theoretical support to design an optimum “lead”, since we found the high docking index degree (it is important to point out that the scope of the invention is not limited to these designed drugs). 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 
         [0033]      FIG. 1  is a representation of structural alignment of the cited model hexamers and the created templates used as a basis for modeling them by homology.  FIG. 1   a  is a structural overlapping of the  X. fastidiosa  (Xf) Pilt model, called XfAa1 (in gray), created from the hexamer of PIIT of the  A. aerolicus  (Aa) bacteria (in its conformation bound to ADP), the code of which PDB is 2gsz (in black).  FIG. 1   b  is a structural overlapping of the Xf PiIT model, called Xf Pal (in gray), created on the basis of the hexamer generated from the biological unit of the PDB (3jvu) of  P. Aeruginosa  (Pa) PiIT in its conformation without ligands (in black).  FIG. 1   c  is a structural overlapping of the Xf PiIT called XfPa2 (in gray), created on the basis of the hexamer generated from the biological unit of the PDB (3jvv) of Pa PiIT in its conformation bound to an analog of the ATP (AMP-PCP) (in black). The RMSD vectors are represented. 
           [0034]      FIG. 2  shows percent vectors of average occupation of area in the interface and free surface of the hexamers by two categories of amino acids (hydrophobic and polar+carried). The structures represented in this figure are: those used as template (from left to right: 2gsz (AaPiIT in conformation of binding to ADP), 3jvu (PaPiIT, unbound conformation), 3jvv (PaPiIT), conformation bound to ATP), XfAa1 (XfPiIT model based on 2gsz), Xf Pal (XfPiIT model based on 3jvu) and XfPa2 (XfPiIT model based on 3Jvvu). 
           [0035]      FIG. 3 :  3   a  interface contact density (ICD) per complex: the total number of contacts of all the interfaces established in each hemameric complex, divided by the sum of the interface area of the whole hexamer to AaPiIT 2gsz, PaPiIT 3jvu, PaPiIT 3jvv, XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa2.  3   b  shows interface contact energy density (ICD) per complex: sum of the energies of interface contacts established in each complex, divided by the sum of the interface areas of the whole hexamer to AaPiIT 2gsz, PaPiIT 3jvu, PaPiIT 3jvv, XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa2. 
           [0036]      FIG. 4 : a Venn diagram demonstrating the occurrence of the residues suggested as target (see table 2) in the three different complexes. (In this case, the occurrence is considered if the residue is present in at least one chain of the hexameric models of XfPiITs, with at least 10 kcal/mol of interface contact energy, more than 1 Å 2  of area exposed to the solvent when in complex, which have the characteristic of being capable of establishing hydrogen bridges and/or contacts of electrostatic nature and, preferably, that are located in pockets in complex and/or in isolation. The residues highlighted in white are located in pockets in complex (that is, in the hexameric conformation there is some adjacent pocket) on at least one chain. The residue E89 is underlined, because it will be used subsequently as an example of structural representation of a target. 
           [0037]      FIG. 5 : alignment of the primary sequence, carried out by means of the software ClustalW (Larkin, M. A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P. A., McWillian, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I. M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J., D., Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948), of PiITs of Proteobacteria pathogenic bacteria that make use of movement guided by IV-type pilus (or as in the case of  Xanthomonas axonopodis , has the IV-type pilus), as cited in “Estado da Técnica” ( Xylella fastidiosa  (XfPiIT_Pt),  Xanthomonas axonopodis  pv citri (XaPiIT_Pt),  Pseudomonas syringae  pv tabaci (PsPiIT_Pt),  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  (PaPiIT_Pt),  Ralstonia solanacearum  (RsPiIT_Pt),  Vibrio cholerae  (VcPiIT_Pt),  Dichelobacter nodosus  (DnPiIT_Pt),  Neisseria gonorrhoeae  (NgPiIT_Pt) and  Neisseria meningitidis  (NmPiIT_Pt), free-life bacteria essential to keeping the balance of numberless echosystems such as Cianobacteria ( Nostoc  sp. NsPiIT_Cy and  Synechocystis  sp. (SsPiIT_Cy) and the bacterium of the filus Aquificales,  Aquifex aeolicus  (AaPiIT). The GI identifiers of the sequences are described in the preceding paragraph. Codes of the pathogenic Proteobacteria PiITss are highlighted in black, Cianobacteria in gray.  A. aeolicus  marked in white. The most important residues in the interface, suggested as targets (which are present on at least one chain of the hexameric Xf_PiIT models, with at least 10 kcal/mol of energy of interface contacts, more than 1 Å 2  of area exposed to the solvent when in complex, which have the characteristic of being capable of establishing hydrogen bridges and/or contacts of electrostatic nature and present or not in pockets) are highlighted as follows: the residues highlighted in long bars in Gray are possible targets that occur in all the PiITs of all the organisms used in the alignment of primary sequence; the residues highlighted in bars in dark gray with length equal to that of the bar of identifiers of pathogenic proteotacteria are the possible specific target of this category of microorganisms and that may be interpreted as preferred targets for the design of drugs to combat these pathogens in common; A small bars in dark gray represents the possible targets that occur only on  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT, these being interpreted as sole targets to Xf; the transparent small bar shows targets that vary in terms of amino acid (e.g: D33 to E33), but the exchanged amino acid has tem similar properties, considered to be a “Positive” because it indicates replacements in which the BLOSUM-62 matrix scores positively according to Altshul and co-workers (S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997 September 1; 25(17):3389-402.); the black circles represent the residues that have varied distribution between the organisms, which are the residues whose fields are in which in Table 2. 
           [0038]      FIG. 6 : structural representation of an example of a therapeutic target, the residue E89 on chain A of the XfAa1 complex, showing the adjacent residues that form the nanoenvironment in which the drug to be designed will bind. This target has been chosen to represent visually, since it is of extreme importance because it exists solely in the Xf_PiIT and exists in all the three models (XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa2) containing “adjacent pocket”, this being a very important characteristic to drug design. 
           [0039]      FIG. 7 : a 2-D representation (obtained by mounting images taken from the software Ligand Scout) of the designed and modeled drugs that obtained the best MolDock Score vectors in each of the docking runs carried out. One carried out five docking runs, the first one being carried out with compounds designed directly from the characteristics of the target site. The next runs were carried out with molecules that were designed on the basis of the best compounds of the preceding runs, the E89C4 m4 being obtained in the second run, E89C4 m30 in the third one, E89C4 m32 in the fourth one and E89C4 m34 in the fifth run and classified as being the best candidate to bind to the target-site E89. With dotted arrows one represent hydrogen bridges that the compound establishes with residues from the target-site; three gray triangles represent the ionizable atoms and adjacent to this representation are the identifications of residue from the target-sites that interact electrostatically with the atom in question; the occurrence of hydrophobic interactions is represented with two curved lines in clear gray. There are more details in the portion of the figure that has the 2-D image of the E89C4 m34 compound that may be suggested (among the compounds designed) as the one that is most likely to bind to the target site. One represents a distance (12.22 Å) of the atom 18 to 8, which shows the correspondence with the size of the cavity (which is about 14 Å long in its lowest portion, the atoms are numbered (following the numbering of the Chem Draw) and are present in the isomeric forms of the compound. 
           [0040]      FIG. 8 : Representation of the surfaces that delimit the “pocket” and that compose the target site of binding is shown ( 8   a ), showing how the ligand has a shape similar to that of the region. In  8   b  one represents the E89C4 m34 and the 3-D positions of the residues that interact with this molecule in the “stick” format. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0041]    The present invention relates to a method for identifying regions likely to be used as therapeutic targets for computational design of drugs, based on structures existing on the surface of monomers constituting the PiIT protein, as well as the listing and characterization of the target predicted, with a view to design molecules that bind in these regions and that are potentially applicable in impairing the activity of this protein, thus controlling infectious processes. 
         [0042]    The proposed method consists of the following steps: 
         [0043]    1—If the complex of the protein of interest, for any reason, is not described or its structure is undetermined, one should generate a model from another protein with high similarigy in its primary sequence, by using homology modeling through the program Swiss-Model (Guex, N. and Peitsch, M. C. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb-Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18:2714-2723) or the program Modeller (Eswar, N., Marti-Renom, M. A., Webb, B., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., Sali., A. 2006. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling With MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Supplement 15, 5.6.1-5.6.30). The validation of the modeling is then carried out through the analysis of the Ramachandran graphs (Ramachandran, G. N., Ramarkrishnan, C., Sasisekharan, V. 1963. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain conformations. J. Mol Biol 7:95-99) and the use of the ProSA web-service (Whiederstein, M., Sippl, M. J. 2007. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acid Research, Web Server issue: W407-10). 
         [0044]    2—Use of the program Deep-View for generating the PDB file of the complex of the protein of interest, by structural overlapping with the complex used as template by the modeling and minimizing energy by using the program Gromacs (Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., Berendsen, H. J. 2005. “GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free”. J Comput Chem 26 (16): 1701-18. doi:10.1002/jcc.20291.); 
         [0045]    3—Use of the server STING (Neshich, G., Togawa, R., Mancini, A. L., Kuser, P. R., Yamagishi, M. E. B., Pappas Jr., G., Torres, W. V., Campos, T. F., Ferreira, L. L., Luna, F. M., Oliveira, A. G., Miura, R. T., Inoue, M. K., Horita, L. G., de Souza, D. F., Dominiquini, F., Alvaro, A., Lima, C. S., Ogawa, F. O., Gomes, B. G., Palandrani, J. C. F., dos Santos, G. F., de Freitas, E. M., Mattiuz, A. R., Costa, I. C., de Almeida, C. L., Souza, S., Baudet, C. and Higa, R. H. 2003. STING Millennium: a Web based suite of programs for comprehensive and yesultaneous analysis of protein structure and sequence. Nucleic Acids Research, 31:13, 3386-3392) for generating the file TGZ containing all the physicochemical and structural parameters of the STING_DB. 
         [0046]    4—All the parameters generated STING are charged in the Star STING (Neshich, G., Mazoni, I., Oliveira, S. R., Yamagishi, M. E., Kuser-Falcão, P. R., Borro, L. C., Morita, D. U., Souza, K. R., Almeida, G. V., Rodrigues, D. N., Jardine, J. G., Togawa, R. C., Mancini, A. L., Higa, R. H., Cruz, S. A., Vieira, F. D., Santos, E. H., Melo, R. C., Santoro, M. M. The Star STING server: a multiplatform environment for protein structure analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2006 Dec. 1; 5(4):717-22) and in the Java Protein Dossier (Neshich, G., Rocchia, W., Mancini, A. L., Yamagishi, M. E., Kuser, P. R., Fileto, R., Baudet, C., Pinto, I. P., Montagner, A. J., Palandrani, J. F., Krauchenco, J. N., Torres, R. C., Souza, S., Togawa, R. C., Higa, R. H. 2004. JavaProtein Dossier: a novel web-based data visualization tool for comprehensive analysis of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul. 1; 32 (Web Server issue):W595-601), a platform for detailing and integrating the analysis of structural function. 
         [0047]    5—Identification of the interface forming residues (IRFs) and obtainment of the data of the respective areas by using the program SurfV (Sridharan, S., Nicholls, A. and Honig, B. 1992. A new vertex algorithm to calculate solvent accessible surface areas. Biophys. J., 61, A174) to calculate the area of accessibility to the solvent by residues in two sceneries: for the isolated chain and for the chain in the complex with other chains. 
         [0048]    6—Studying the occurrence of categories of amino acids in Interface Forming Residues (IFRI) and free Surface (which is given by the difference between the total molecular surface), with regard to the amino acids that form it, and also as far as the categories of amino acids are concerned: Polares: Cys, Ser, Thr, Tyr, Asn, Gln, His and Trp; Carregados: Asp, Glu, Arg, Lys; Hidrofóbicos: Ala, Ile, Leu, Val, Met, Phe and Pro; and Glicina: which can be considered fourth category (Branden, C. and Tooze, J. 1991. Introduction to protein structure. Garland Publishing, New York, ISBN 0-815-30270-3). This phase is important for indicating to which extent the interface in question is polar and charged. The analysis if made by using MySQL databanks (http://www.mysql.com/) and tables containing area values obtained with the program Surf V. 
         [0049]    7—Use of the STING (Neshich, G., Togawa, R., Mancini, A. L., Kuser, P. R., Yamagishi, M. E. B., Pappas Jr., G., Torres, W. V., Campos, T. F., Ferreira, L. L., Luna, F. M., Oliveira, A. G., Miura, R. T., Inoue, M. K., Horita, L. G., de Souza, D. F., Dominiquini, F., Alvaro, A., Lima, C. S., Ogawa, F. O., Gomes, B. G., Palandrani, J. C. F., dos Santos, G. F., de Freitas, E. M., Mattiuz, A. R., Costa, I. C., de Almeida, C. L., Souza, S., Baudet, C. and Higa, R. H. 2003. STING Millennium: a Web based suite of programs for comprehensive and yesultaneous analysis of protein structure and sequence. Nucleic Acids Research, 31:13, 3386-3392) and of the Java Protein Dossier (Neshich G., Rocchia W., Mancini A. L., Yamagishi M. E., Kuser P. R., Fileto R., Baudet C., Pinto I. P., Montagner A. J., Palandrani J. F., Krauchenco J. N., Torres R. C., Souza S., Togawa R. C., Higa R. H. 2004. JavaProtein Dossier: a novel web-based data visualization tool for comprehensive analysis of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul. 1; 32 (Web Server issue):W595-601) for calculating the number, type and, therefore, the total energy of the contacts established between the interface of the amino acids of selected chain and adjacent chains. 
         [0050]    8—Once in possession of the data describing the area occupied by specific residues in a determined surface, carrying out the creation of two indexes: Interface Contacts Energy Density (ICED), which is given by the sum of the energies for all the contacts IFRs divided by the sum of the area occupied in the interface by all the IFRs; and Interface Contacts Density (ICD) that is given by the total number of contacts established through each contact divided by the total area. Additionally, the program Java Protein Dossier (Neshich, G., Rocchia, W., Mancini, A. L., Yamagishi, M. E., Kuser, P. R., Fileto, R., Baudet, C., Pinto, I. P., Montagner, A. J., Palandrani, J. F., Krauchenco, J. N., Torres, R. C., Souza, S., Togawa, R. C., Higa, R. H. 2004. JavaProtein Dossier: a novel web-based data visualization tool for comprehensive analysis of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul. 1; 32 (Web Server issue):W595-601) is used for general structural analysis and the program PyMol (Delano, W. L. 2002. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System Delano Scientific, San Carlos, Calif., USA. http://www.pymol.org) is used for generating the molecular images. 
         [0051]    9—Carrying out the selection of therapeutic targets on the basis of physicochemical and structural characteristics (such as: high contact energy values, polarity) (area exposed to the solvent, presence in “pocket”, among others of interest, by using the module Select of the STING Java Protein Dossier (Neshich, G., Rocchia W., Mancini, A. L., Yamagishi, M. E., Kuser, P. R., Fileto, R., Baudet, C., Pinto, I. P., Montagner, A. J., Palandrani, J. F., Krauchenco, J. N., Torres, R. C., Souza, S., Togawa, R. C., Higa, R. H. 2004. JavaProtein Dossier: a novel web-based data visualization tool for comprehensive analysis of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul. 1; 32 (Web Server issue):W595-601). 
         [0052]    10—Alignment between the primary structure of proteins homologous to the protein of interest through the program ClustalW 2.0 (Larkin, M. A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P. A., McWillian, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I. M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J., D., Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948) evidencing the similarities and differences between these two sets of proteins and seeking correspondences in the alignment of primary structure of the residues contacted in “9”. Following certain criteria like: presence exclusively in the pathogenic bacteria sequences, choosing the preferred therapeutic targets. 
         [0053]    11—Proceeding with industrial methods and protocols for structure-based drug design, regardless of whether it is a novel method or one based on structures already known by virtual screening. 
       EXAMPLES 
       [0054]    The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the following examples, which should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. 
         [0055]    In order to understand better the physicochemical characteristics of the  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT, which are believed to be the key to the correct functioning of the protein and since the  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT has a high similarity in primary sequence with respect to  A. aeolicus  PiIT (about 68% similarity and 49% identical amino acids) and even higher with respect to  P. aeruginosa  PiIT (about 87% similarity and 74% identical amino acids, as indicated by the probram BLASTp (S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997 Sep. 1; 25(17):3389-402), one used 3-D structures of the PiIT hexamers  Aquifex aeolicus  (Aa) (PDB code: 2gsz, in a conformation bound to ADP obtained ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org/pub/pdb/data/structures/all/pdb/pdb2gsz.ent.gz) and the  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  (Pa) PiITs hexameric complexes (PDB codes: 3jvu and 3jvv, in unbound conformations and conformations bount to ATP, respectively, obtained in the addresses ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org/pub/pdb/data/biounit/coordinates/all/3jvu.pdb1.gz and ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org/pub/pdb/data/biounit/coordinates/all/3jvu.pdb1.gz) for homology modeling of each of the 6 chains different from  X. fastidiosa  PiIT (XfPiIT) on the basis of the corresponding chains in the templates, and in the three conformations, based on 2gsz, 3jvu and 3jvv, using the program Modeller (Eswar, N., Marti-Renom, M. A., Webb, B., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., Sali., A. 2006. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling With MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Supplement 15, 5.6.1-5.6.30), generating, in all, 18 chains, of 3 complexes. 
         [0056]    Subsequently, by using the program Deep-View (Guex, N. and Peitsch, M. C. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb-Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18:2714-2723), one carried out the assembly of the complexes on the basis of structural overlapping of the XfPiIT chains in their templates. In this way, three files PDB were created for the XfPiIT hexamers: one based on 2gsz, another based on 3jvu and the other based on 3jvv. The making of these three templates of complexes is of great importance, since it aims at simulating the various states of the PiIT protein, which is exactly dynamic and probably mute from conformation to conformation for the correct functioning and rupture of the ATP in ADP. The existence of these different conformations in the templates enable one to suggest targets that are exposed in a conformation and/or chain and inside the surface in another, as interesting targets for preventing the correct function of the protein when the latter is already assembled on the basis of the pilus. Therefore, it is necessary to study the three conformations and seek similarities and differences between them  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  (Pa). 
         [0057]    After assembling the complexes, one carried out minimization of the energy by using the program Gromacs (Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., Berendsen, H. J. 2005. “GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free”. J Comput Chem 26 (16): 1701-18. doi:10.1002/jcc.20291). The three minimized complexes generated were called XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa1, and are listed in table 1. An evaluation was made Fo the modeled complexed using the analysis of Ramachandran graphs (Ramachandran, G. N., Ramarkrishnan, C., Sasisekharan, V. 1963. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain conformations. J. Mol Biol 7:95-99), which indicated that the three templates had more than 98% of the residues in the permitted regions. The evaluation through the ProsaWeb indicated that the z-score values ranged from −8.96 to −9.67, values that are contained in the interval of results usually encountered for the native proteins of similar size (Whiederstein, M., Sippl, M. J. 2007. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acid Research, Web Server issue: W407-10). Therefore, the three templates of XfPiIT complexes were considered acceptable for continuation of the analysis. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Identification of the three templates created, on which the homology 
               
               
                 modeling, description and values obtained for evaluation of the 
               
               
                 templates were based. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Templates 
                   
               
               
                 Models of 
                 used in 
               
               
                 hexamer of Xf 
                 homology 
               
               
                 PilT generated 
                 modeling 
                 Description 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Xfa1.pdb 
                 2gsz.pdb 
                 Model created by using the 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Modeller on the basis of the 
               
               
                   
                   
                 hexameric AaPilT bound to ADP 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (PDB; 2gsz), with additional 
               
               
                   
                   
                 minimization of energy carried out 
               
               
                   
                   
                 with the program Gromacs 
               
               
                 Xfa1.pdb 
                 2gsz.pdb 
                 Model created by using the 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Modeller on the basis of the PaPilT 
               
               
                   
                   
                 hexamer without ligands (PDB; 
               
               
                   
                   
                 3jvu), with additional minimization of 
               
               
                   
                   
                 energy carried out with the program 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Gromacs 
               
               
                 Xfa1.pdb 
                 2gsz.pdb 
                 Model created by using the 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Modeller on the basis of the PaPilT 
               
               
                   
                   
                 bound to an analog of ATP (AMP- 
               
               
                   
                   
                 PCP) (PDB: 3jvv), with additional 
               
               
                   
                   
                 minimization of energy carried out 
               
               
                   
                   
                 with the program Gromacs 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0058]    The modeled structures of thee  X. fastidiosa  (XfAa1, XfPa1e XfPa2) PiIT hexamers were structurally aligned against their templates (AaPiIT com ADP: 2gsz, PaPiIT without ligands: 3jvu and PaPiIT with ATP: 3jvv), as shown in  FIG. 1 , which resulted in overlapping with deviations of 0.388, 0.297 and 0.231 for the three alignments respectively shown in  1   a ,  1   b  and  1   c , which indicates that the structures of the complexes are very similar to each other (template vs. the model generated). 
         [0059]    By using the platform Blue Star STING (Neshich, G., Togawa, R., Mancini, A. L., Kuser, P. R., Yamagishi, M. E. B., Pappas Jr., G., Torres, W. V., Campos, T. F., Ferreira, L. L., Luna, F. M., Oliveira, A. G., Miura, R. T., Inoue, M. K., Horita, L. G., de Souza, D. F., Dominiquini, F., Alvaro, A., Lima, C. S., Ogawa, F. O., Gomes, B. G., Palandrani, J. C. F., dos Santos, G. F., de Freitas, E. M., Mattiuz, A. R., Costa, I. C., de Almeida, C. L., Souza, S., Baudet, C. and Higa, R. H. 2003. STING Millennium: a Web based suite of programs for comprehensive and yesultaneous analysis of protein structure and sequence. Nucleic Acids Research, 31:13, 3386-3392) and the program Java Protein Dossier (JPD) (Neshich, G., Rocchia, W., Mancini, A. L., Yamagishi, M. E., Kuser, P. R., Fileto, R., Baudet, C., Pinto, I. P., Montagner, A. J., Palandrani J. F., Krauchenco, J. N., Torres, R. C., Souza, S., Togawa, R. C., Higa, R. H. 2004. JavaProtein Dossier: a novel web-based data visualization tool for comprehensive analysis of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul. 1; 32 (Web Server issue):W595-601), chiefly in the module called “Formiga” (ant) (Higa, R. H.; Neshich, G. Defining 3D residue environment in protein structures using SCORPION and FORMIGA. Bioinformatics (Oxford), Oxford, v. 20, n. 12, p. 1989-1991, 2004), it was possible to select and analyze the interface forming residues as well as find out the area values that these occupy in the Interface and in the free Surface, and such data are not calculated through the program SurfV (Sridharan, S., Nicholls, A. and Honig, B. 1992. A new vertex algorithm to calculate solvent accessible surface areas. Biophys. J, 61, A174). 
         [0060]    With this analysis, it was possible to observe that the nature of the Interface Forming Residues (IFR) of the  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT complexes, is predominantly of polar charged residues, as can be seen in  FIG. 2 , similar to the results obtained by Satyshur and co-workers (Satyshur K. Aa., Worzalla G. A., Meyer L. S., Heiniger E. K., Aukema K. G., Misic A. M., Forest K. T. 2007. Crystal structures of the pilus retraction motor PiIT suggest large domain movements and subunit cooperation drive motility. Structure. 2007 March; 15(3):363-76) which indicate that the interfaces would be predominantly charged and polar. The sum of all the interface areas of all the monomers of the  Aquifex aeolicus  PiIT hexamer 18890.20 Å 2 , of which 13455.55 Å 2  (71.23%) are formed by polar and charged residues of the categories. For  X. fastidiosa , PiIT hexamers there are 18173.88 Å 2 , 18446.96 Å 2  and 18882.558 Å 2  of total interface areas and 13592.32 Å 2  (72.5%), 14020.77 Å 2  (70.88%) and 14208.91 Å 2  (70.88%) of areas occupied by polar and charged residues, respectively for XfAa1, Xf Pal and XfPa2, which demonstrates clearly the importance that such residues have in the constitution of the IFRs. The interfaces of the Pa hexamers have values of area occupied by polar and charged amino acids similar that found for Xf: 71.42% and 70.93% for 3jvu and 3jvv, respectively. 
         [0061]    Statistic approaches were used to find whether the values of the averages of the percents of areas occupied by polar and charged residues were significantly different from those found for the chains of Pa and Xf PiIT hexamers with respect to Aa hexamer. It was observed that such data are highly likely to follow a normal distribution (P-value of the test for D&#39;Agostino normality=0.092) and Student T Test, which resulted in a P value (5.25×10 −6 ), which demonstrated that the interfaces of Aa (2gsz) PiIT interfaces are highly likely to be significantly different from the averages found for the PiIT interfaces of the Pa and Xf pathogenic proteobacteria. It was thus suggested that the 2gsz interfaces have a smaller area occupied by such residues if compared with the Pa and Xf PiIT interfaces. It was also checked through the T text, whether the values of areas occupied by polar and charged residues were similar to those found in the interfaces of the models with respect to the templates used for modeling them. In the comparison of 3jvu (Pa PiIT hexamer without ligands) against XfPa1 and of 3jvu (Pa PiIT hexamer bound to AMP-PCP) against XfPa2 resulted in P-values equivalent to 0.96 and 0.89, respectively, indicating that there is a high probability that they refer to similar data, which in this case suggest that the Pa and Xf PiIT interfaces are equally occupied, in their majority, by polar and charged residues. In the comparison of XfAa1 with the template used for modeling, 2gsz (Aa PiIT hexamer), a P-value of 0.019 was obtained, which indicates that these are different samples, suggesting that Aa PiIT has a different area of occupation by such residues with respect to Xf PiITs. These results can suggest that the interfaces of the pathogenic proteobacteria are more polar and charged that those of other distant bacteria such as Aa. This characteristic is of the utmost importance, since the presence of various residues capable of establishing contact of electrostatic nature and other polar contacts such as hydrogen bridges indicates that various sites among these may be used to identify a target for the structure-based drug design (A. C. Anderson. The process of structure-based drug design. Chem Biol. 2003 September; 10(9):787-97). 
         [0062]    These results can indicate an important characteristic of the Pa and Xf PiITs: their interfaces seem to have a slightly larger area occupied by residues that are capable of forming interactions or strong contact (for instance: of attractive/repulsive electrostatic nature and hydrogen bridges), with respect to the Aa, 2gsz PiIT complex. Complementarily, the  A. aeolicus  PiIT interfaces have slightly hydrophobic area than the  X. fastidiosa  PiIT interfaces, which can indicate a greater inclination of the IFRs of  A. aeolicus  2gsz to form high-energy contact. A way to test this latter hypothesis is by analyzing the number, type and energy of contact established between the IFRs of both hexamers. By using the program STING JPD, one can identify which IFRs were establishing contacts through the given interfaces. It was observed that many hydrophilic amino acids are identified by establishing contact between the  X. fastidiosa  PiIT interfaces. 
         [0063]    By using the programs Blue Star Sting and JPD, one collected data on the number, type and energies of contacts established in the interface. For area values that are approximately similar to Xf and AaPiIT, the average of the sum of all the IFR contact energies to the three complexes of the  X. fastidiosa  PiIT (7.008.53 Kcal.mol −1 , with standard error of the average (SEM of 190.55) is higher than the corresponding value for the sum of the contact energies in the  A. aeolicus  PiIT interfaces (5.203.60 Kcal.mol −1 ). With regard to the number of contacts established by IFRs, the interface of the  A. aeolicus  PiIT establishes a total of 884 contacts, while the interfaces of the models of  X. fastidiosa  PiIT have, on an average, a surprising greater number: 1.218 contacts (SEM of 12.86). The same thing is observed for the interfaces of the Pa PiITs: 1023 contacts (SEM of 74), which establishes about 6.487.40 Kcal.mol −1  (SEM of 175.80) of interaction energies, on an average, for the whole complex. 
         [0064]    As to the charged contacts of attractive force, charged with repulsive force and hydrogen bonds (non-hydrophobic/energetically stronger contacts) established between the IFRs, the  X. fastidiosa  and  P. aeruginosa  interfaces demonstrate to have contact in larger number and with higher energy than those established in the  A. aeolicus  PiIT interface. Whereas AaPIIT (2gsz) has, on an average, 88 of these contacts per chain and an average of 824.87 Kcal.mol-1 of contact energy per chain, the Xf (XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa2) PiITs have, respectively: an average of 115, 133 and 134 non-hydrophobic contacts per chain, which generate interaction energy in the interface of 1.044.8, 1.143.4 and 1.157.47 Kcal.mol −1 . The same values for the Pa PiITs are similar to those of the Xf PiITs: number of non-hydrophobic contacts of 126 and 119 and energies of 10.74.13 and 1.018.93 Kcal.mol-1, on an average, per chain of the 3jvu and 3jvv hexamers. This indicates that the interfaces of the PiIT hexamers of the Xf and Pa pathogenic proteobacteria, regardless of the conformation, establish a larger number of high-energy contacts than the interfaces of 2gsz. 
         [0065]    The data obtained were used for calculating the Interface Contact Energy Density (ICED), which is an index that can illustrate the energy indexes of contacts established between all the chains of the 820 hexamers normalized by the sum of the total interface area occupied by the residues that establish these contacts. The structures of the  X. fastidiosa  and  P. aeruginosa  PiITs have higher ICEDs than  A. aeolicus  PiIT, which suggests that the interfaces of the PiITs of these organisms establish more contacts and with higher energy per area with respect to what is observed for Aa PiIT. The values for Xf PiITs are still higher than those of Pa PiIT, as can be seen in  FIG. 3 . The average of the ICEDs for Aa PiIT, 2gsz is of 0.28 Kcal.mol-1.Å 2 , while for the Xf and Pa PiITs they are, respectively, of 0.38 and 0.34 Kcal.mol-1.Å 2 . 
         [0066]    In order to reply to the question whether the difference between the ICEDs and the PiITs of bacteria Xf, Pa with respect to Aa, one used the Student T Test. It was observed that the ICED data is highly likely to follow a normal distribution (P-value of the D&#39;Agsotino normality test=0.061) and have similar standard diversions of values. Thus, one obtained a P-value equivalent to 3.48×10 −7  for the test that compared the averages of the ICED values of the Aa (2gsz) PiIT with those of the Pa and Xf PiITs. This value indicates that there is a high probability that these are statistically different samples, and what they can suggest is that the interfaces of the PiIT hexamers of the pathogenic proteobacteria have higher contact energies per area than the Aa PiIT hexamer. 
         [0067]    Finally, other analysis of the interface contacts were carried out: the program Blue Star STING JPD was used to view and select the amino acids that establish the energetically richer contacts (herein we put as a cut value for the selection thereof by established at least 10 Kcal.mol01 of contact energy in the interface), which had a minimum area of exposure to the solvent when in complex (in these cases, in the hexameric form), which have the characteristic of establishing hydrogen bridges and/or contacts of electrostatic nature and that are not necessarily located in pockets in complex and/or in isolation. This search resulted in 54 adjacent different residues (42 of which are part of the pockets) adjacent in complex or in isolation), which are probably the most likely to be used as therapeutic targets for structure-based drug design, as is discussed in the Paper by Anderson (A. C. Anderson. The process of structure-based drug design. Chem Biol. 2003 September; 10(9)787-97.2003). The listing of these residues, as well as some of their characteristics, such as: number of Xf PiIT chains containing them, following such parameters, maximum and average values of contact energy which the residue establishes in the interface and presence of pockets, are shown in table 2. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 22 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Listing of the 54 residues identified as possible therapeutic target for the process of structure-based drug design 
               
               
                 and important information on them, such as the number of chains of hexameric XfPilT models in which the 
               
               
                 residue appears as a target, the maximum and average value of interface contact energy found for it, presence of 
               
               
                 pocket in isolation (when the chain is isolated from the remaining complex, that is when it is in its monomeric state) 
               
               
                 and in complex (that is, if in the hexameric formation there is some adjacent pocket). The last column refers to the 
               
               
                 alignment of primary sequence shown in FIG. 5, with respect to presence/absence in three groups of organisms; 
               
               
                 pathogenic proteobacteria for animals and plants (Pt),  Aquificae  and  Cyanobacteria  (CY). The sequence 
               
               
                 used in making this alignment were extracted from the Protein database of the NCBI 
               
               
                 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/). The pathogenic proteobacteria sequences are the following: 
               
               
                   Xylella fastidiosa  PilT 9 a 5c with GI: 15838234 (Xf),  Xanthomonas axonoodis  pv  citri  str. 306 GI: 
               
               
                 21243651 (Xa),  Pseudomonas    syringae  pv  tabaci  ATCC 11528 GI: 257483590 (Ps),  Pseudomonas aeruginosa   
               
               
                 GI: 301015820 (Pa),  Ralstonia solanacearum  UW551 GI: 83747263 (Rs),  Vibrio cholerae  V52 GI: 121728590 (Vc), 
               
               
                   Dichelobacter nodosus  VCS1703A GI: 146329541 (Dn),  Neisseria gonorrhoeae  DGI18 GI: 240013043 (Ng), 
               
               
                   Neisseria meningitidis  Z2491 GI: 218767246 (Nm). The  Cyanobacterium  PilT sequences are:  Nostoc  sp. 
               
               
                 PCC 7120 GI: 17229935 (Ns) and  Synechocystis  sp. PCC 6803 GI: 16331158 (Ss). 
               
               
                 The sequence of  Aquifex aeolicus  VF5 (Aa) used was GI: 119389376. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Organism (of those 
               
               
                   
                 Number of 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 used in the alignment 
               
               
                   
                 chains of 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 of FIG. 5) that have, 
               
               
                 Identification 
                 XfPilT 
                   
                 Average 
                   
                   
                 in their PilT, this 
               
               
                 of the 
                 complexes in 
                 Maximum 
                 value of 
                   
                 Presence in 
                 residue in a 
               
               
                 residue 
                 which the 
                 value of 
                 interface 
                   
                 pockets in 
                 corresponding 
               
               
                 (amino acid 
                 residue 
                 interface 
                 contact 
                 Presence in 
                 complex (in the 
                 position in 
               
               
                 and 
                 appears as a 
                 contact energy 
                 energy for 
                 pockets in 
                 hexameric 
                 alignments of 
               
               
                 position) 
                 target 
                 for the residue 
                 the residue 
                 isolation 
                 conformation) 
                 primary structures 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 D160 
                 5 
                 30.00 
                 16.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 D17 
                 17 
                 40.60 
                 38.39 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 D196 
                 18 
                 153.80 
                 107.10 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 D198 
                 16 
                 40.00 
                 36.25 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 D207 
                 2 
                 20.00 
                 15.00 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 D242 
                 4 
                 41.20 
                 17.95 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 D70 
                 18 
                 41.82 
                 37.73 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 E159 
                 5 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 E163 
                 2 
                 20.00 
                 15.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 E204 
                 1 
                 20.00 
                 20.00 
                 Yes 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 E209 
                 2 
                 40.00 
                 25.00 
                 — 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 E219 
                 17 
                 45.30 
                 29.52 
                 Yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 H154 
                 5 
                 51.50 
                 44.10 
                 — 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 H19 
                 8 
                 62.70 
                 55.59 
                 — 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 H222 
                 1 
                 11.50 
                 11.50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 H229 
                 2 
                 15.00 
                 13.25 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 R176 
                 2 
                 42.10 
                 41.80 
                 — 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 R194 
                 18 
                 101.80 
                 79.91 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R206 
                 6 
                 40.00 
                 18.33 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 all 
               
               
                 R239 
                 16 
                 60.00 
                 34.87 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R29 
                 18 
                 104.10 
                 86.07 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R294 
                 7 
                 40.00 
                 14.46 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R80 
                 12 
                 40.00 
                 25.00 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R82 
                 9 
                 40.60 
                 29.26 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 R97 
                 9 
                 50.46 
                 19.31 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 all 
               
               
                 E258 
                 18 
                 70.00 
                 29.85 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 E74 
                 2 
                 30.00 
                 25.00 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 K235 
                 13 
                 40.60 
                 22.54 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 K249 
                 2 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 R35 
                 7 
                 42.07 
                 28.04 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 R90 
                 6 
                 46.40 
                 19.53 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 D33 
                 16 
                 41.20 
                 28.21 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 E248 
                 2 
                 20.00 
                 15.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 R36 
                 5 
                 53.10 
                 28.26 
                 — 
                 — 
                 All as Pt 
               
               
                 D184 
                 2 
                 40.00 
                 35.00 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 Only Pilt de  X. fastidiosa   
               
               
                 E89 
                 16 
                 145.80 
                 92.38 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 Only Pilt de  X. fastidiosa   
               
               
                 K187 
                 10 
                 30.00 
                 21.00 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Only Pilt de  X. fastidiosa   
               
               
                 H152 
                 17 
                 84.10 
                 47.41 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Ps, Dn 
               
               
                 E336 
                 5 
                 40.00 
                 28.30 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Dn 
               
               
                 K58 
                 2 
                 72.60 
                 46.30 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Ng, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Nm 
               
               
                 R212 
                 2 
                 33.20 
                 23.20 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Dn 
               
               
                 R335 
                 15 
                 51.20 
                 34.28 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Vc, Dn 
               
               
                 E65 
                 9 
                 36.10 
                 20.49 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Rs, Vc 
               
               
                 E177 
                 4 
                 60.00 
                 42.12 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Aa 
               
               
                 K170 
                 1 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Ng+, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Nm+, Aa++ 
               
               
                 E68 
                 11 
                 40.00 
                 22.73 
                 yes 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Vc, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Dn, Aa 
               
               
                 E64 
                 3 
                 20.00 
                 15.27 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Vc, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Dn, Ng Nm, Aa, Ns, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Ss+ 
               
               
                 R290 
                 18 
                 108.80 
                 78.48 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Vc, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Dn, Ng Nm, Ns, Ss 
               
               
                 R180 
                 1 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Vc. Ns, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Ss 
               
               
                 D181 
                 3 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 yes 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Rs, Vc, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Dn+, Ng, Nm, Aa 
               
               
                 H179 
                 10 
                 36.80 
                 24.00 
                 — 
                 yes 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Vc, Dn, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Aa, Ns, Ss 
               
               
                 D62 
                 1 
                 21.50 
                 21.50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Vc, Dn, Ng, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Nm 
               
               
                 H183 
                 1 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa, Ps, Pa, Vc+, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Ss+ 
               
               
                 E120 
                 1 
                 10.00 
                 10.00 
                 — 
                 — 
                 Xf, Xa+, Ps+, Pa+, 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Dn+, Ng, Nm, Ns+, Ss 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0068]    Another important characteristic that will be considered upon designing drugs is the frequency of occurrence of the residue to be considered as a target in all the 18 possible chains in three modeled complexes. A determined residue may occur with these characteristics in only one conformation of the Xf PiIT (as for example, residue E74 in the XfAa1 model), as can occur with these characteristics in all the three conformations (as for example, residue E89, which has such characteristics in the three hexamers: XfAa1, XfPa1 and XfPa2). The importance of this description lies in that fact that a determined drug may have, as a target, the binding on a residue at a given moment of the PiIT protein (e.g.: if, in its bound state ATP, it exhibits structure of the hexamer, as we predicted in the XfPa2 model), on in various ones. The future processes of docking chemical compounds will have, as a target, one or more chains of one or more hexamers, according to the predicted characteristics of each target in each chain of each hexamer. Therefore, a Venn diagram was generated which contains the distribution of the 54 residues selected in the three hexamers modeled, as shown in  FIG. 4 . 
         [0069]    With regard to the definition of the therapeutic targets, as already cited before, the anti-microbial drug design should be based on targets that are found mainly in the pathogens (not in non-pathogenic organism). In order to check whether, among the 54 residues selected, existed any residues of occurrence restricted to pathogenic organism such as Xf, Pa and other described before, with regard to non-pathogenic organisms (such as Aa) and even to organisms essential to the balance of ecosystems such as cyanobacteria (bacteria that photosynthesize and fixe atmospheric nitrogen), an alignment of primary structure was carried out, which included PiIT of various organisms that include these categories and that are known in the literature on presence of the PiIT, Type-IV Pilus and motility of the twitching type. This alignment, represented in  FIG. 5 , indicates that there is a high preservation of the IFRs, described above as potential targets, in this alignment of PiIT sequences. This is one more possible evidence of the importance of the IFRs for pathogenic organisms that make use of the PiIT IV. One may speculate that the sequences of the Proteobacterium PiIT, being extremely preserved (Wall, D. and Kaiser, D. Type IV pili and cell motility. Mol Microbiol. 1999 April; 32(1):1-10. Review), would have their structure equally similar and, if so, the similarities and the differences observed in this alignment could also reflect the real characteristics of the structure. 
         [0070]    In this alignment ( FIG. 5 ), the 54 residues were contacted, and 25 of them occurred in all the organisms, coinciding with the position of the residue in XfPiIT (D160, D17, D196, D198, D207, D242, D70, E159, E163, E204, E209, E219, H154, H19, H222, H229, R176, R194, R206, R239, R29, R294, R80, R82 and R97), which would constitute unspecific targets of the pathogens; 9 occurred in all the pathogenic Proteobacteria (E258, E74, K235, K249, R35, R90, D33, E248 and R36) constituting good targets for the development of drugs that reach this range of pathogens; 3 residues are exclusive of the  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIT (D184, E89 and K187) which may constitute therapeutic targets for the development of drugs more specific to Xf PiIT; 6 other residues occur in varied distribution, but still only in Xf and other pathogenic proteobacteria, but not in all of them (H152, E336, K58, R212, R335 and E65); and, finally, 17 residues that occur in varied distribution among Xf, other proteobacteria and always including Aa or some of the cyanobacteria, also constituting more unspecific targets(H152, E336, K58, R212, R335, E65, E177, K170, E68, E64, R290, R180, D181, H179, D62, H183 and E120). 
         [0071]    In addition to the inclination of the possible therapeutic targets to the design of drugs against XfPiIT, this analysis enables us to select them as to their possible specificity, since one aims at targets that occur preferably in Xf and/or other pathogenic bacteria of medical/economic interest. Therefore, the 18 targets called “preferred” herein for occurring only in Xf or in pathogenic proteobacteria are: D184, E89, K187, E258, E74, K235, K249, R35, R90, D33, E248, R36, H152, E336, K58, R212, R335 and E65 (but this does not present the other 36 residues from being used, but rather the 18 cited residues Will be preferred for designing drugs). Another interesting fact is that various charged residues that have the characteristic of contributing much in energetic terms to the XfPiIT interfaces, which may be interpreted as a possible explanation for the statistically differences between the ICED values and the occurrence of areas of polar and charged residues among the Pa and Xf PiIT hexamers and the Aa PiIT hexamer. 
         [0072]    Various hypotheses may be formulated to explain how these observations reflect on the function of the protein, performance and stability, and these may be discussed in future studies. 
         [0073]    Thus, the most important amino acids among the IFRs, that is: the IFRs that establish more energetic contact are preserved within a group of pathogenic proteobacteria that make use of the PiIT-dependent twitching motility as a moving mechanism. These preserved amino acids (summed to the specific ones for Xf) are those indicated as the preferred therapeutic targets for the development of drugs by physicochemical-structural complementarity, without invalidating the possibility of using the other residues (for instance, those which occur in all the organisms). 
         [0074]    The main objective will be the production of a drug that binds in the future interface region of a certain monomer and prevents its oligomerization and/or prevents this drug from binding to oligomerized hexamer, in some of its conformations, and prevents the correct functioning of the interface and ATPasic activity. 
       Practical Example of Structure-Based Drug Design (SBDS) 
       [0075]    Techniques of designing drugs on the basis of protein structure can be applied on the basis of possible therapeutic targets predicted. Hereinafter, one gives an exemplification of one of the various ways that can be adopted for the de novo design of drugs, which begins in mapping favorable interaction positions for functional groups (e.g.: in which positions one can design hydroxyl, amine, hydrophobic, cyclic groups, among others), or even small fragments of molecules. New compounds can then be developed de novo, so that relevant functional groups are located at positions that will determine a correct special relationship with the target site. After the design, one should proceed with modeling of its three-dimensional structure, docking tests, choice of the best ligands, prediction of the molecular/structural bases of their binding (e.g.: type of interactions that the latter is capable of carrying out). There is a number of software suitable for the de novo drug design and screening approaches, like the SPROUT (http:www.simbiosys.ca/sprout/), much used for the de novo design based on fragments. This program includes modules for identifying and selecting functional groups and positions on the target-sites to form initial fragments of compounds for generating structure (module EIeFAnT) and, as these are selected, skeletons are generated which meet the steric restrictions of the target-pocket by growing spacing fragments connecting them to the initial fragments (module SPIDEeR). Finally, one substitutes atoms on the skeleton until molecules are generated which are compatible with the electrostatic properties of the target-site (module MARABOU). The solutions may be characterized and have binding scores calculated by using the ALLigaTOR module. 
         [0076]    Besides the de novo design of compounds, one aims at compounds that bind to the target-sites predicted by virtual screening on a large scale, by using databanks of three-dimensional structures of small molecules, as for example PubChem Compound (ftp://p.ncbi.nlm.nih/gov/pubchem/Compound — 3D/), as a source of ligands to be used in screening against a target-site. The simulation of the protein-ligand interaction with a view to evaluating the capability of a ligand to form strong interactions and to fit into a target site is called “docking”. Docking algorithms that include the following (but not limited thereto): Dock (Kuntz, I., Blaney, J., Oatley, S., Langridge, R., and Ferrin, T. 1982. A geometric approach to macromolecular-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 161, 269-288), FlexX (Kramer, B., Metz, G., Rarey, M., and Langauer, T. 1999. Ligand docking and screening with FlexX.Med. Chem. Res. 9, 463-478) AUTODOCK (Goodsell, D., Morris, G., and Olson, A. 1996. Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock. J. Mol. Recognit. 9, 1-5). MOL-DOCK (Thomsen, R., Christensen, M. H. MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking. J Med Chem. 2006 Jun. 1; 49(11):3315-21.) and GOLD (Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., Taylor, R. Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748) can be used to carry out the “docking” in the region of interest to find the molecules that establish more favorable interactions that adapt better to the target site, being chosen by ranking the docking score. 
         [0077]    In the example described hereinafter, one aims at the practical demonstration of one of the possible “pipeline” of how one could make the prediction of structure of compounds that will possibly bind to the targets predicted through a de novo design. The methodology is not limited to the molecules to be described in this context, but rather to all the molecules that Will be designed on the basis of the physicochemical and structural characteristics of the sites chosen as therapeutic sites, be it by means of a de novo design of drugs using fragments, software and prediction, virtual screening, screening using drugs or by other methods. 
         [0078]    About 50 compounds were designed de novo, based on the site which houses the target residue E89 of the chain A of the  Xylella fastidiosa  XfAa1 model using this residue considered to be exclusive of Xf, which suggests that the drug that will be designed on the basis of this target will possible be specified to the Xf PiIT. First, the physicochemical and structural description of the target-site in question will be required, which can be seen in  FIG. 6 . In this structure, the E89 is located between the interfaces CTD n :NTD n+1 , located in the NTD of the chain A and interacts with various residues in interface (Hydrogen bridge with Q175, two electrostatic interactions of reproduction with E74 and one hydrophobic interaction with I162, all of them of the chain F), resulting in a total of 23.8 Kcal/mol of interaction energy. By using the programs STING  J PD and Molegro Virtual Docker (MVD), one can observe that this residue is part of the adjacent pockets. The program MVD carried out the prediction of two pockets that surround the residue E89 (pocket 1 having 55.29 Å 3  of volume and pocket 2 with 45.05 Å 3  of volume). The fusion of these pockets gave rise to a new pocket of volume equal to 100.35 Å 3  and surface area equivalent to 381.44 Å 3 , as shown in  FIG. 6 . The residues adjacent this pocket (at a distance of less than 6 Å) include, in addition to the E89, two more negatively charged residues (Glu 177 and Glu 74 of the chain F), three positively charged residues (Arg90 and Lys45 of the chain A and Arg180 and Arg80), eight apolar residues (Ile162, Val165, Leu172 an Ile173 of the chain F, Ala22, Gly23, Leu24 and Ala92 of the chain A) and three polar residues (Gln88 and Asn87 of the chain A and Gln 175 of the chain F). 
         [0079]    Thus, following the structure of the pocket with regard to the limits thereof and atom sizes, one designed about 40 chemical structures of drugs that would possibly Interact with the mentioned region, mainly with the target-sites predicted and located close to the pocket E89 (residue exclusive of Xf), R90 and E74 (residues exclusive of pathogenic proteobacteria). The paper began with the design of four base-structures using the program ChemDraw (http://www.cambridgesoft.com/) and modeling the three-dimensional structure in the module Chem3Dpro. This module further enabled the small molecules modeled in 3D to undergo minimization of energy and molecular dynamics to achieve na acceptable structural conformation. These designed structures have certain characteristics in common: presence of two cyclic ends, which may be: 5-carbon ring and 6-carbon ring (either aromatic or not), for interaction with apolar residues and occupation of the wide spaces of the pocket, a spacing carbonic region between the rings (between four and five carbons), a group of ionizable carboxyl group bound to one of the rings for interaction (preferably of electrostatic order) with the Arg90, closest to the pocket, one or more ionizable amine groups for interaction with the polar and negative residues and presence or absence of hydroxyl groups. 
         [0080]    Then a docking simulation was carried out (with the flexible ligand) by using the program MVD, centered on the mentioned pocket and with a search space radius of 15 Å. The algorithm for score calculation used was the MolDock Score [GRID], using a Grid resolution of 0.3 Å (evaluating the ligand by means of internal interactions of hydrogen bridges, electrostatic interactions and distortions Sp 2 -Sp 2 ). The search and docketing algorithm used was the MolDock Optimizer (which is na implementation of a variation of the evolutionary algorithm), with 10 runs, population size equal to 100 and with 3000 interactions. After docketing, the MVD carried out minimization of energy and optimization of hydrogen bridge. 
         [0081]    Of the four designed and modeled base-structures, the compounds that achieved the Best dock score thereof (−1105.62) was called E89C4 m4. Subsequently, evaluating that the atoms could be altered/withdrawn/added to optimize the binding to the target-site and, specifically, to the target site (E89), changes were made through the ChemDraw and a new modeling was made by using Chem3Dpro. In this way, one carried out, in all, four additional docking runs with molecules that were designed on the basis of the Best compounds of the preceding runs. The compounds with the best MolDock Scores of each of the Five runs (E89 Cm4, E89 Cm29, E89C4 m30, E89C4 m32 and E89C4 m34), like the portions developed in the interactions and the residues that would with the molecule in question are represented in  FIG. 7  and the data referring to the docking of these ligands are shown in Table 3. At the end, one obtained a structure with better MolDock Score value (−131.118), which establishes−142.72 Kcal/mol of interaction energy with the protein. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Data referring to the “docking” of the molecules cited and the 
               
               
                 MolDock Score values obtained, protein interaction energy, energies 
               
               
                 referring to electrostatic interactions of short distance, (lower than 4.5 Å) and 
               
               
                 long distance (higher than 4.5 Å), energy associated to the establishment of 
               
               
                 hydrogen bridges (wherein all the energy values are given in Kcal/mol), 
               
               
                 number of heavy atoms and molecular weight of each compound and the 
               
               
                 ligand reference (LE1) given as the ratio between the MolDock Score and the 
               
               
                 number of heavy atoms. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Electrostatic 
                 Electrostatic 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 interaction 
                 interaction 
               
               
                   
                 MolDock 
                   
                 (short 
                 (long 
                 Hydrogen 
                 Heavy 
                 Molecular 
                 Ligad 
               
               
                 Ligand 
                 Score 
                 Interaction 
                 distance) 
                 distance) 
                 bridges 
                 Atoms 
                 weight 
                 efficiency 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 E89C4M34 
                 −131.118 
                 −142.772 
                 −22.8288 
                 −2.55371 
                 −6.36607 
                 24 
                 333.468 
                 −5.46237 
               
               
                 E89C4M30 
                 −124.067 
                 −128.484 
                 0 
                 0 
                 −11.3605 
                 24 
                 333.422 
                 −5.16945 
               
               
                 E89C4M29 
                 −120.767 
                 −127.069 
                 0 
                 0 
                 −6.8006 
                 24 
                 333.4222 
                 −5.03195 
               
               
                 E89C4M32 
                 −111.706 
                 −133.849 
                 −21.9648 
                 −1.95334 
                 −7.15845 
                 24 
                 332.48 
                 −4.6544 
               
               
                 E89C4M4 
                 −105.62 
                 −108.811 
                 −17.8373 
                 −0.42324 
                 −5.55281 
                 20 
                 283.386 
                 −5.281 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0082]    The compounds herein called E89C4 m34 ( FIG. 7 ) has the formula C 19 H 32 N 3 O 2 , notation SMILES [O—]C(═O)C2=CC═C(C(CCCC\1CCCCC1=C/[NH3+])CC[NH3+])CN2, molecular weight of 334.484 Da, 56 atoms (24 of which are heavy), 11 rotary ligand, 2 rings, one of which is aromatic. One used the program Ligand Scout for prediction of some polar and chemical characteristics such as the octhanol/water partition coefficient (LogP), which influences the properties ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolization and Excretion) of the drug by indicting the lipophilicity of the compound. The E89C4 m34 has cLogP of −0.923, which indicates that it is water-soluble, and with TPSA (Total Polar Surface Area) of 108 Å 2 . It further has 3 hydrogen-bridge donating atoms (atom N 23 which establishes hydrogen bridges with the residues Glu89A and Glu74F, atom N 17 which establishes hydrogen bridge with Gln175F, and atom N 10), hydrogen bridge accepting atoms (O19 e O20), a negatively ionizable one (O19, which interacts strongly through short-distance attractive electrostatic interactions (less than 4.5 Å) with Arg90A) and two positively ionizable ones (atoms N 17 and N 23, the latter being responsible for two strong short-distance attractive electrostatic interactions with the residues E89A and E74F). The rings are important to the development of hydrophobic interactions with apolar residues of the target-site such as Ala22A and Ile173F, Table 04. 
         [0000]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Data referring to the targets of interaction of the compound E89C4m34 with the target-side, showing which chain it 
               
               
                 belongs to, its name, identification, total energy established in contacts and energy from short- and long-distance electrostatic 
               
               
                 interaction. 
               
               
                   
               
             
             
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Total energy 
                 Energy from long-distance 
                   
               
               
                 Target 
                   
                 Identification of 
                 established with the 
                 electrostataic 
                 Energy from short-distance 
               
               
                 chain 
                 Amino acido 
                 the residue 
                 residue 
                 (r &gt; 4.5) 
                 electrostatic interaction (r &lt; 4.5) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Glu 
                 89 
                 −41.3234 
                 −1.02331 
                 −14.3845 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Arg 
                 90 
                 −18.0581 
                 0.457393 
                 −1.18198 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Glu 
                 74 
                 −13.1333 
                 −0.00599243 
                 −7.26196 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Gln 
                 175 
                 −9.68925 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Lys 
                 45 
                 −8.52262 
                 −1.34031 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Gly 
                 23 
                 −7.64588 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Ala 
                 22 
                 −7.18962 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Ile 
                 173 
                 −7.06743 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Gln 
                 88 
                 −5.28542 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Gly 
                 91 
                 −5.21324 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 His 
                 166 
                 −3.54791 
                 0.877045 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Thr 
                 167 
                 −3.28522 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Val 
                 165 
                 −2.68033 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Total energy 
                 Energy from long-distance 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Identification of 
                 established with the 
                 electrostatic 
                 Energy from short-distance 
               
               
                 Chain 
                 Amino acido 
                 the residue 
                 residue 
                 interaction (r &gt; 4.5) 
                 electrostatic interaction (r &lt; 4.5) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Asn 
                 174 
                 −2.24359 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Ser 
                 168 
                 −1.96354 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Glu 
                 159 
                 −1.70918 
                 −1.70918 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Glu 
                 177 
                 −1.44564 
                 −1.44564 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Asp 
                 181 
                 −1.38837 
                 −1.38837 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Leu 
                 24 
                 −1.37025 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Ser 
                 21 
                 −1.25635 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Ala 
                 92 
                 −0.65466 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 Val 
                 47 
                 −0.45698 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Asp 
                 145 
                 −0.38244 
                 −0.382442 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Glu 
                 163 
                 −0.34223 
                 −0.342231 
               
               
                 XfAa1[A] 
                 His 
                 44 
                 −0.30635 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Lys 
                 149 
                 0.308608 
                 0.308608 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Lys 
                 102 
                 0.442583 
                 0.442583 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Arg 
                 180 
                 1.21.20099 
                 1.20099 
               
               
                 XfAa1[F] 
                 Arg 
                 80 
                 1.73437 
                 2.22489 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0083]    The complete listing of the residues that Interact with the compounds, as well as the total energy established between them and the atoms of the E89C4 m34 and the energy established through short-distance and long-distance electrostatic interaction. The residues that establish the strongest interactions are: E89 and R90 of the chain A (−41.32 and −18.05 Kcal/mol, respectively) and with E74 of the chain F (−13.13 Kcal/mol), which are residues included in the list of therapeutic targets exclusive of pathogenic proteobacteria, wherein E89 exclusive of Xf. The representation of the surfaces that delimit the pocket, which compose the binding target site is shown in figure EP, showing how the ligand has a shape similar to that of the region. In  FIG. 8   b  one represented the E89C4 m34 and the positions of the residues that interact with this molecule. 
         [0084]    In this patent application we have demonstrated the methodology for identifying specific therapeutic targets for the design of new drugs in modeled structures of the  Xylella fastidiosa  PiIt and that has possible application for pathogenic organism which also have this protein with a high degree of sequence similarity and correspondence in the residues indicated as targets in alignment of primary structure. Then we provide a list of 54 target residues to be used in process of structure-based design, 18 of which will be preferably used. Finally, we proposed computational-design Technologies were proposed, as well as a few structures of chemical compounds for Binding on the target site E89 of the Xf PiIT. The characterization of the interaction between the designed compound, which has the highest energies of interaction with the corresponding target in the Xf PiIT (herein this compound is called E89C4 m34) was described in detail, embracing physicochemical and structural characteristics. It is important to point out that the present patent application is not limited to the drugs cited, but rather its methodology for identifying target-residues in the protein PiIT, the target residues suggested for the drug design and the proposal of methods can culminate in the design/identification of various liable to be used for preventing the correct functioning of the PiIT (be it by preventing oligomerization or by preventing the dynamics of the interface in the hexamer formed). The drug suggested is only one of the examples of the work that is being carried out.