Abstract:
Disclosed is a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head for jetting inks out of a nozzle by making use of a distortion of a piezo-electric element. The driving method includes a first step of driving the piezo-electric element so that a meniscus of inks is receded from an initial position of the nozzle to a first position within the nozzle, a second step of driving the piezo-electric element so that the meniscus quickly advances from the first position to a second position within the nozzle, and a third step of driving the piezo-electric element so that the meniscus slowly advances from the second position to the initial position. A particle quantity of ink particles is changed by changing a movement quantity from the first position to the second position in the second step.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates generally to a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head for jetting an ink out of a nozzle by making use of a distortion of a piezo-electric element and, more particularly, to a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head for changing a quantity of ink particles jetted out. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     Ink jet printers are used for apparatuses such as a printer, facsimile and so on. There has been availed a piezo-electric type ink jet printer using a piezo-electric element among those ink jet printers. The piezo-electric type ink jet printer is constructed to jet inks out of a nozzle by making use of a distortion of the piezo-electric element. 
     In this type of ink jet printer, a print dot diameter is required to be variable to express gradations of a print. For this purpose, changing a quantity of ink particles to be jetted is requested of the above printer. 
     A method of jetting the inks is classified into a positive polarity drive method of sucking the inks after jetting out the inks, and a negative polarity drive method of jetting out the inks after sucking the inks. According to the negative polarity drive method, a scatter of the ink particles is stable, and a possible-of-getting-particled frequency is broad. 
     FIGS. 25A-25D and FIGS. 26A-26E are explanatory diagrams showing a first prior art. 
     A d31-mode is a mode making most of a distortion caused when the piezo-electric element shrinks upon an application of a positive voltage. In this mode, the piezo-electric element is distorted in a perpendicular direction for an electric-field direction. In this d31-mode, when a voltage indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 25A is applied to the piezo-electric element, operation of jetting the inks is performed after sucking the inks. 
     FIGS. 26A-26E are enlarged views of the nozzle. A meniscus  10  is formed in a nozzle  1 . Herein, a velocity vector the meniscus has is expressed by “V”. 
     FIG. 26A shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when the piezo-electric element is in an initial state. A surface tension of the meniscus  10  equibrates with a negative within the pressure chamber, and the meniscus  10  exists in an initial position in the vicinity of a nozzle outlet. 
     FIG. 26B shows a position. of the meniscus  10  when increasing the negative pressure in the pressure chamber by letting the piezo-electric element shrink in such a direction as to expand the pressure chamber. That is, it shows a case where a positive voltage having a positive inclination is, as indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 25A, applied thereto. The negative pressure in the pressure chamber gets larger than the surface tension of the meniscus  10 , and the meniscus  10  is receded toward the pressure chamber. 
     FIG. 26C shows a position when the negative pressure in the pressure chamber is reduced due to an influx of the inks from an ink supply port enough to reduce the negative pressure in the pressure chamber and the meniscus  10  is substantially stopped. At this time, the meniscus  10  is forced to move back to the vicinity of the pressure chamber. 
     FIG. 26D shows a position of the meniscus  10  when the piezo-electric element is abruptly expanded in such a direction as to contract the pressure chamber. That is, it shows a case where a voltage having a negative inclination is, as indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 25A, applied thereto. The meniscus  10  forms a layer flow by dint of a positive pressure within the pressure chamber and the surface tension of the meniscus, and has a larger velocity toward the nozzle outlet. Accordingly, the meniscus  10  quickly moves toward the nozzle outlet. 
     FIG. 26E shows a state of the meniscus  10  when the expansion of the piezo-electric element is stopped. The pressure in the pressure chamber becomes a large negative pressure due to a flux of the inks to the ink supply port as well as to the nozzle  1 . Therefore, the inks in the nozzle  1  are abruptly decelerated. The ink liquid outside the nozzle has, however, a velocity enough to scatter out and hence overwhelms the surface tension given from the inks of the nozzle  1 , thereby getting particled. Thereafter, the inks having an insufficient velocity are forced to return inside the nozzle  1  by dint of the surface tension. 
     The states described above are repeated, thereby forming the ink particles and jetting them out. 
     Known as a first prior art method of controlling the particle quantity of the ink particles is a method of decreasing a voltage amplitude applied to the piezo-electric element down to V 2  as indicated by a solid line in FIG.  25 A. The particle quantity of the ink particles can be reduced by this method. FIGS. 25B through 25D show a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when jetting the small ink particles. 
     FIG. 25B shows a state when starting a suction of the inks. The meniscus  10  is moving toward the pressure chamber. 
     FIG. 25C shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when finishing the suction of the inks and starting the jet-out of the inks. Since an amplitude of the voltage applied to the piezo-electric element is reduced, a recession quantity of the meniscus becomes smaller than in the case of FIG. 26 c.    
     FIG. 25D shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when the ink liquid gets particled. As the recession quantity of the meniscus  10  has been decreased, the ink particle quantity also decreases. 
     A second prior art method of controlling the ink particle quantity will be explained with reference to FIGS. 27A through 27D. 
     According to the second method, the ink particle quantity is reduced by changing a receding velocity of the meniscus. Along with this, a jetting speed is controlled. More specifically, as indicated by a solid line in FIG. 27A, a drive voltage for the piezo-electric element remains unchanged, and a rising slope of the drive voltage is made steep. The particle quantity of the ink particles becomes smaller as this slope gets steeper and steeper. Note that the drive waveform in the case of generating a normal quantity of ink particles is shown by the dotted line as in FIG.  25 A. 
     FIG. 27B shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when starting the suction of the inks. At this time, a higher velocity toward the pressure chamber is given to the meniscus  10  by quickly sucking the inks than in the case of jetting a normal quantity of the ink particles (as indicated by the dotted line in FIG.  27 A). Then, the meniscus  10  is forced to move to the vicinity of the pressure chamber. 
     FIG. 27C shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when starting the jet-out of the inks upon finishing the suction of the inks. The meniscus  10  is receded to the vicinity of the pressure chamber in the nozzle  1  by the suction of the inks, and therefore the inks can be accelerated enough. 
     FIG. 27D shows a state of how the nozzle  1  and the meniscus  10  might be when the ink liquid gets particled. The ink liquid having the sufficient velocity gets particled and thereafter scatter out. 
     A third prior art method of controlling the ink particle quantity will be described referring to FIGS. 28A through 28D. 
     According to the third method, as indicated by a solid line in FIG. 28A, the drive voltage is reduced down to V 2  as in the first prior art method, and the recession quantity of the meniscus when sucking the inks is decreased. Along with this, a voltage changing velocity when jetting the inks is made much higher, thereby preventing the meniscus from decreasing in its velocity when jetting the inks. 
     FIG. 28B shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when starting the suction of the inks. FIG. 28C shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when finishing the suction of the inks. The voltage amplitude is reduced, and hence the meniscus  10  is not receded to the vicinity of the pressure chamber. Herein, as described above, the inks are quickly jetted out. At this moment, the inks in close proximity to the nozzle outlet are jetted out while being incapable of obtaining the sufficient velocity. Those inks are, however, mixed with forthcoming inks that are enough accelerated and become the ink particles having a desired velocity on the whole. 
     FIG. 28D shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the ink liquid gets particled. The sufficiently accelerated ink liquid get particled and thereafter scatter out. 
     The third method is intended to compensate a drop in the velocity that is caused due to the reduction in the recession quantity of the meniscus. 
     There arise, however, the following problems inherent in the first prior art method. 
     The ink liquid is, while existing in the nozzle, pushed by the positive pressure in the pressure chamber and can be accelerated. Once the ink liquid is jetted out of the nozzle outlet, however, the ink liquid can not be accelerated much higher than it. Therefore, as done by this method, if the recession quantity of the meniscus  10  is reduced, some ink liquid existing in the vicinity of the nozzle outlet in the intra nozzle ink liquid is jetted out of the nozzle outlet while not being sufficiently accelerated. 
     For this reason, the ink liquid does not reach a target velocity and is not accelerated. Thereafter, the ink liquid, which has not been accelerated, is mixed with the forthcoming ink liquid having the sufficient velocity. However, the layer flow state disappears, and hence the direction of a velocity vector of the ink particles is disturbed. This leads to a decline in terms of a scatter stability. In combination with this, a kinetic energy is lost by the mixture of the ink liquids, whereby the average ink particle velocity slows down. This might cause a disturbance in a printed image. 
     Further, the second prior art method presents the problems which follow. 
     Just when the meniscus  10  is abruptly receded, the pressure in the pressure chamber is changed to the positive pressure, and therefore, as shown in FIG. 27D, a velocity distribution in radial direction of the nozzle is disturbed. This results in a disturbance in the scattering direction of the ink particles. Therefore, in the drive waveform shown in FIG. 27A, a time Trb can not be shortened enough, so that a variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can not be taken large. 
     Moreover, the third prior art method has the following problems. 
     (1) As in the case of the first prior art method, since the recession quantity of the meniscus is reduced, the scattering direction of the ink particles is disturbed. 
     (2) An increase in the variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles entails a quick enhancement of the velocity of the meniscus when jetted out. Even if the velocity of the meniscus when jetted out is quickly increased, however, the velocity of the meniscus when jetted out is restricted by a natural frequency of the piezo-electric element. Therefore, the variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can not be taken large. 
     (3) If the velocity of the meniscus when jetted out is quickly increased, an overshoot of the piezo-electric element enlarges, and a large quantity of satellite particles are produced. This might cause a decline in terms of the print quality, with result that the variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can not be taken large. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head, by which a variation width of a particle quantity of ink particles can be taken large. 
     It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head, by which the variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can be taken large, and a velocity of the ink particles can be prevented from decreasing. 
     It is still another object of the present invention to provide a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head, by which the variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can be taken large, and a scatter of the ink particles can be prevented from being disturbed. 
     According to the present invention, there is provided a method of driving a piezo-electric type ink jet head, having a pressure chamber for reserving inks, a nozzle for jetting out ink particles from the pressure chamber and a piezo-electric element for supplying the pressure chamber with a pressure for jetting out the ink particles, for changing a particle quantity, i.e., volume of the ink particles to be jetted. The driving method comprises a first step of driving the piezo-electric element so that a meniscus of inks is receded from an initial position of the nozzle to a first position within the nozzle, a second step of driving the piezo-electric element so that the meniscus quickly advances from the first position to a second position within the nozzle, and a third step of driving the piezo-electric element so that the meniscus slowly advances from the second position to the initial position, i.e., the meniscus advances more slowly in the third step than in the second step. 
     According to the present invention, a movement quantity of the meniscus when sucking the inks is fixed. Then, a particle quantity of the ink particles is varied by controlling the movement quantity when abruptly moving the meniscus toward a nozzle outlet at the time of jetting the inks. 
     According to the present invention, the movement quantity of the meniscus when sucking the inks is fixed, and it is therefore feasible to prevent a disturbance of scatter and a decrease in velocity, which are derived from a prior art method of changing a suction quantity of the meniscus. Further, the movement quantity in the case of abruptly moving the meniscus toward the nozzle outlet when jetting the inks, is controlled, and hence an abrupt voltage variation is not required unlike the prior art. Therefore, a variation width of the particle quantity of the ink particles can be taken large. 
     Other features and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments given below, serve to explain the principle of the invention, in which: 
     FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a first embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a construction of an ink jet head used for the present invention; 
     FIGS. 3A,  3 B,  3 C and  3 D are explanatory diagrams showing an operation in the first embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 4 is a graph showing characteristic in the first embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIGS. 5A,  5 B and  5 C are explanatory diagrams showing a second embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 6 is a chart showing a characteristic in the second embodiment shown in FIGS. 5A,  5 B and  5 C; 
     FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing a third embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIGS. 8A,  8 B,  8 C,  8 D and  8 E are explanatory diagrams showing an operation in the third embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing a fourth embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIGS. 10A,  10 B,  10 C,  10 D and  10 E are explanatory diagrams showing an operation in the fourth embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 11 is diagram illustrating another construction of the ink jet head used for the present invention; 
     FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing a fifth embodiment of the present invention; 
     FIG. 13 is an explanatory circuit diagram showing a drive circuit according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 14 is a time chart of the drive circuit shown in FIG. 13; 
     FIG. 15 is an explanatory circuit diagram showing another drive circuit according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 16 is an explanatory graph showing a relationship between a temperature and an ink viscosity according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 17 is an explanatory graph showing a relationship between the temperature and a piezo-electric displacement quantity according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 18 is an explanatory graph showing waveforms when compensating the temperature according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 19 is an explanatory graph showing a relationship between the temperature and an ink jetting quantity according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 20 is an explanatory view illustrating a construction of the head according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 21 is an explanatory diagram showing a construction of a head drive circuit according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 22 is an explanatory diagram showing a construction of a print system according to the present invention; 
     FIGS. 23A and 23B are explanatory diagrams showing a relationship between a sheet and a printed result according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 24 is an explanatory diagram showing another construction of the print system according to the present invention; 
     FIGS. 25A,  25 B,  25 C and  25 D are explanatory diagrams (part  1 ) showing a first prior art; 
     FIGS. 26A,  26 B,  26 C,  26 D and  26 E are explanatory diagrams (part  2 ) showing the first prior art; 
     FIGS. 27A,  27 B,  27 C and  27 D are explanatory diagrams showing a second prior art; and 
     FIGS. 28A,  28 B,  28 C and  28 D are explanatory diagrams showing a third prior art. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a construction of an ink jet head. FIGS. 3A through 3D are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the first embodiment of the present invention. 
     To start with, the construction of the ink jet head will be explained with reference to FIG. 2. A nozzle  1  jets out inks. A nozzle plate  2  forms the nozzle  1  and constitutes walls by which a pressure chamber  6  is defined. An elastic member  3  is provided between the nozzle plate  2  and a pressure plate  4  and exhibits elasticity. The pressure plate  4  transfers a force generated by a piezo-electric element  5  into the pressure chamber  6 . The piezo-electric element  5  is provided on the pressure plate  4  and displaced by an application of a voltage. The pressure chamber  6  pressurizes the inks. The pressure chamber  6  communicates with the nozzle  1  and is connected to an ink tank. 
     This piezo-electric element  5 , upon an application of a positive voltage, shrinks and operates in a d31-mode. Then, the piezo-electric element  5  is driven with a negative polarity. 
     Next, the first embodiment will be discussed referring to FIGS. 1 and 3A through  3 D. 
     FIG. 1 shows a drive waveform of the piezo-electric element  5 . A dotted line in FIG. 1 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out a normal quantity of ink particles. A solid line in FIG. 1 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out a relatively small quantity of ink particles. Note that FIGS. 3A through 3D are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the case of the solid line waveform in FIG.  1 . 
     FIG. 3A shows a state of how the nozzle and a meniscus might be when the meniscus starts moving toward the pressure chamber from an initial position. At this time, as shown in FIG. 1, a first drive voltage having an inclination, i.e., oblique, in a positive direction is applied to the piezo-electric element  5 . With this voltage application, the piezo-electric element  5  shrinks, whereby a negative pressure is produced within the pressure chamber  6 . The meniscus is moved back toward the pressure chamber from the initial position. 
     FIG. 3B shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus starts quickly moving toward an outlet of the nozzle  1  immediately after the piezo-electric element  5  has switched over to an expansion from the contraction. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 1, after the first drive voltage having the positive inclination has been applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for a time t 1 , a second drive voltage having a negative steep inclination is applied thereto. The drive voltage exhibiting the positive inclination comes to have a drive voltage value on the order or V 5  after the above-mentioned time t 1  has elapsed. A maximum value of the drive voltage having the positive inclination is the same as that in the case of jetting out the ink particles having a normal particle size as indicated by the dotted line in the Figure. Accordingly, the meniscus is moved back to a first predetermined position within the nozzle  1 . A quantity of this recession is the same as that in the case of jetting out the ink particles having the normal particle size. 
     Further, the piezo-electric element  5  is, upon applying the second drive voltage having the negative inclination thereto, switched over to the expansion. The meniscus is thereby quickly moved toward the outlet of the nozzle  1 . 
     FIG. 3C illustrates a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be in the case of abruptly decreasing a velocity of the expansion of the piezo-electric element  5  just when the meniscus reaches a second position within the nozzle. To be more specific, as shown in FIG. 1, the second drive voltage having the negative steep inclination is applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for a time t 2 . A potential difference of the second drive voltage is V 4 . Then, after the time t 2  has elapsed, the voltage is changed to a third drive voltage having a negative gentle inclination. The piezo-electric element  5  is thereby abruptly decreased in terms of the expanding velocity. 
     In this state, a small quantity of inks existing at an edge of the meniscus within the nozzle  1  are sufficiently accelerated. Then, the ink liquid posterior thereto within the nozzle  1  comes to a state of being abruptly decelerated. Therefore, the ink liquid in the vicinity of the meniscus starts getting particled. 
     FIG. 3D shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the piezo-electric element  5  stops its expansion. More specifically, it is a state after a third drive voltage has been applied for a time t 4 . In this state, the small quantity of ink liquid accelerated enough steers clear of a surface tension and gets particled. Further, the inks inside the nozzle  1  are temporarily forced to move inside the nozzle by the negative pressure in the pressure chamber  6  that is produced due to an ink flux to an ink supply port and the nozzle  1 . Thereafter, the inks return to the vicinity of the nozzle outlet due to the surface tension. 
     Thus, when changing a particle quantity of the ink particles, a change in the quantity of recession of the inks is not permitted. Therefore, the ink liquid can be sufficiently accelerated within the nozzle. Then, a moving quantity from the first position to the second position is changed by changing the potential difference V 4  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started. The ink particles, the quantity of which corresponds to the moving quantity, can be thereby generated. 
     Then, the velocity can be also compensated by changing the time t 2  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started, i.e., by changing the inclination of the voltage when abruptly expanded. 
     FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram in the first embodiment of the present invention. 
     FIG. 4 shows variations in the liquid quantity of the ink particles when changing the potential difference V 4  described above. In the case of jetting out the ink particles having the normal particle size, a test uses a head, wherein an ink sucking time t 1  is 80 μs, an ink jetting time t 3  is 8 μs, and a voltage amplitude V 5  assumes a drive waveform of 45v (indicated by the dotted line in FIG.  1 ). At this time, the head jets out the ink particles on the order of 55 pl. The ink particle quantity can be reduced down to 7 pl when changing the potential difference V 4  by using this head. 
     Thus, the ink particle quantity can be varied in a wide range, and the fluctuations in the velocity can be restrained down to 10% or under. 
     FIGS. 5A,  5 B and  5 C are explanatory diagrams showing a second embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a characteristic chart relative to FIGS. 5A through 5C. 
     As shown in FIG. 6, levels  1 - 4  are set corresponding to quantities of the ink particles generated. A drive waveform of the level  1  is indicated by dotted lines in FIGS. 5A to  5 C. In this drive waveform, the voltage amplitude V 5  is 43.5v, the ink sucking time t 1  is 80 μs, the ink jetting time t 2  is 6 μs, and the potential difference V 4 /V 5  is 1.0. This is set as an ink particle quantity of the normal particle size, which quantity is on the order of 56 pl. 
     A drive waveform of the level  2  is indicated by a solid line in FIG.  5 A. In this drive waveform, the voltage amplitude V 5  is 43.5v, the ink sucking time t 1  is 70 μs, the ink jetting time t 2  is 3 μs, the potential difference V 4 /V 5  is 0.7, and a restoration time t 4  is 22 μs. The ink particle quantity at this time is 31 pl. 
     A drive waveform of the level  3  is indicated by a solid line in FIG.  5 B. In this drive waveform, the voltage amplitude V 5  is 43.5v, the ink sucking time t 1  is 60 μs, the ink jetting time t 2  is 1 μs, the potential difference V 4 /V 5  is 0.5, and the restoration time t 4  is 24 μs. The ink particle quantity at this time is 12 pl. 
     A drive waveform of the level  4  is indicated by a solid line in FIG.  5 C. In this drive waveform, the voltage amplitude V 5  is 43.5v, the ink sucking time t 1  is 50 μs, the ink jetting time t 2  is 1 μs, the potential difference V 4 /V 5  is 0.46, and the restoration time t 4  is 24 μs. The ink particle quantity at this time is 5 pl. 
     Thus, in the head having the ink particle quantity as maximum as 56 pl, the ink particle quantity can be so changed as to be minimized down to 5 pl. Further, the ink sucking time is slightly changed, thereby varying an ink sucking velocity. With this change, the ink particle quantity can be varied in much wider range. Moreover, the ink jetting velocity is compensated by changing the ink jetting time t 2 . The ink jetting velocity thereby becomes substantially constant. 
     FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing a third embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 8A to  8 E are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the third embodiment of the present invention. 
     A dotted line in FIG. 7 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out the normal quantity of ink particles. A solid line in FIG. 7 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out the relatively small quantity of ink particles. FIGS. 8A and 8B are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the case of jetting out the small ink particles. 
     FIG. 8A shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus starts moving toward the pressure chamber from the initial position. At this time, as shown in FIG. 7, the first drive voltage having the inclination in the positive direction is applied to the piezo-electric element  5 . With this voltage application, the piezo-electric element  5  shrinks, whereby the negative pressure is produced within the pressure chamber  6 . The meniscus is thereby receded toward the pressure chamber from the initial position. 
     FIG. 8B shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus starts quickly moving toward the outlet of the nozzle  1  immediately after the piezo-electric element  5  has switched over to the expansion from the contraction. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 7, the first drive voltage having the positive inclination is applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for the time t 1 . Consequently, the meniscus is receded to the first predetermined position in the nozzle  1 . Thereafter, a quantity of this recession is the same as that in the case of jetting out the normal quantity of ink particles. 
     At this time, the ink liquid still has a residual velocity to move toward the pressure chamber. If immediately shifted to the ink jetting operation, it follows that there must be a futile energy of jetting out the inks, corresponding to a speed required therefor. Then, as shown in FIG. 7, after an end of the movement toward the pressure chamber, the operation is halted for a fixed period (t 5 -t 2 ) till the velocity remaining in the ink liquid disappears without shifting to the next stage. 
     As shown in FIG. 8C, the piezo-electric element  5  is, upon applying the second drive voltage having the negative inclination thereto, switched over to the expansion. The meniscus is thereby quickly moved toward the outlet of the nozzle  1 . 
     When the meniscus reaches the second position within the nozzle, the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly reduced. FIG. 8D shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be at that moment. To be more specific, as shown in FIG. 7, the second drive voltage having the negative steep inclination is applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for the time t 2 . A potential difference caused there is V 4 . Then, after the time t 2  has elapsed, the voltage is changed to the third drive voltage having the negative gentle inclination. The piezo-electric element  5  is thereby abruptly decreased in terms of the expanding velocity. 
     In this state, the small quantity of inks existing at the edge of the meniscus within the nozzle  1  are sufficiently accelerated. Then, the ink liquid posterior thereto within the nozzle  1  comes to a state of being abruptly decelerated. Therefore, the ink liquid in the vicinity of the meniscus starts getting particled. 
     FIG. 8E shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the piezo-electric element  5  stops its expansion. More specifically, it is a state after the third drive voltage has been applied for the time t 4 . In this state, the small quantity of ink liquid accelerated enough steers clear of the surface tension and gets particled. Further, the inks inside the nozzle  1  are temporarily forced to move inwardly of the nozzle by the negative pressure in the pressure chamber  6  that is produced due to the ink flux to the ink supply port and the nozzle  1 . Thereafter, the inks return to the vicinity of the nozzle outlet due to the surface tension. 
     In the third embodiment also, when changing the particle quantity of the ink particles, a change in the quantity of recession of the inks is not permitted, and therefore the ink liquid can be sufficiently accelerated, within the nozzle. Then, the moving quantity from the first position to the second position is changed by changing the potential difference V 4  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started. The ink particles, the quantity of which corresponds to the shift quantity, can be thereby generated. 
     Then, the velocity can be also compensated by changing the time t 2  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started, i.e., by changing the inclination of the voltage when abruptly expanded. 
     Further, the period during which to absorb the velocity of the ink liquid is provided before the ink jetting operation, and hence the ink jetting energy can be used at a high efficiency. 
     FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing a fourth embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 10A through 10E are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the fourth embodiment of the present invention. 
     A dotted line in FIG. 9 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out the normal quantity of ink particles. A solid line in FIG. 9 indicates a drive waveform when jetting out the relatively small quantity of ink particles. 
     FIGS. 10A through 10E are explanatory diagrams showing operations in the case of jetting out the ink particles of the small particle size. 
     FIG. 10A shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus starts moving toward the pressure chamber from the initial position; At this time, as shown in FIG. 9, the first drive voltage having the inclination in the positive direction is applied to the piezo-electric element  5 . With this voltage application, the piezo-electric element  5  shrinks, whereby the negative pressure is produced within the pressure chamber  6 . The meniscus is thereby receded toward the pressure chamber from the initial position. 
     FIG. 10B shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus starts quickly moving toward the outlet of the nozzle  1  immediately after the piezo-electric element  5  has switched over to the expansion from the contraction. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 9, the first drive voltage having the positive inclination is applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for the time t 1 . Consequently, the meniscus is receded to the first predetermined position in the nozzle  1 . Thereafter, the quantity of this recession is the same as that in the case of jetting out the normal quantity of ink particles. 
     Then, the piezo-electric element  5  is, upon applying the second drive voltage having the negative inclination thereto, switched over to the expansion. The meniscus is thereby quickly moved toward the outlet of the nozzle  1 . 
     When the meniscus reaches the second position within the nozzle, the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly reduced. FIG. 10C shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be at that moment. To be more specific, as shown in FIG. 9, the second drive voltage having the negative steep inclination is applied to the piezo-electric element  5  for the time t 2 . A potential difference caused there is V 4 . 
     In this state, the small quantity of inks existing at the edge of the meniscus within the nozzle  1  are sufficiently accelerated. Then, the ink liquid posterior thereto within the nozzle  1  comes to a state of being abruptly decelerated. Therefore, the ink liquid in the vicinity of the meniscus starts getting particled. 
     When the ink liquid starts getting particled, the meniscus is stopped. FIG. 10D shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be at that time. Thus, it is feasible to prevent the ink liquid exhibiting a sufficient kinetic energy from being mixed with the ink liquid having an insufficient kinetic energy by temporarily stopping the meniscus. Owing to this prevention, it is possible to prevent the velocity of the ink particles from decreasing and the ink particle quantity from increasing as well. 
     Then, after a time t 5  has passed, the voltage is changed to the third drive voltage having the negative gentle inclination. The piezo-electric element  5  is thereby delayed in terms of the expanding velocity. 
     FIG. 10E shows a state of how the nozzle and the meniscus might be when the meniscus is returned to the initial position at a low velocity. In this state, the small quantity of sufficiently accelerated ink liquid steers clear of the surface tension and gets particled. Further, the inks inside the nozzle  1  are temporarily forced to move inside the nozzle by the negative pressure in the pressure chamber  6  that is produced due to the ink flux to the ink supply port and the nozzle  1 . Thereafter, the inks return to the vicinity of the nozzle outlet due to the surface tension. 
     In the fourth embodiment also, when changing the particle quantity of the ink particles, the change in the quantity of recession of the inks is not permitted, and therefore the ink liquid can be sufficiently accelerated within the nozzle. Then, the shift quantity from the first position to the second position is changed by changing the potential difference V 4  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started. The ink particles, the quantity of which corresponds to the shift quantity, can be thereby generated. 
     Then, the velocity can be also compensated by changing the time t 2  till the expansion velocity of the piezo-electric element  5  is abruptly decreased since the abrupt expansion thereof was started, i.e., by changing the inclination of the voltage when abruptly expanded. 
     Further, the meniscus is temporarily stopped during the ink jetting operation, and it is therefore feasible to prevent the ink liquid exhibiting the sufficient kinetic energy from being mixed with the ink liquid having the insufficient kinetic energy. Owing to this prevention, it is possible to prevent the velocity of the ink particles from decreasing and the ink particle quantity from increasing as well. Accordingly, a smaller, quantity of ink particles can be generated, and the ink particle quantity can be controlled in a broader range. 
     FIG. 11 is a view showing another construction of the ink jet head. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing the fourth embodiment of the present invention. 
     As shown in FIG. 11, the nozzle plate  2  forms the nozzle  1 . A wall member  11  constitutes walls by which the pressure chamber  6  is defined. A piezo-electric element  7  constitutes walls of the pressure chamber  6 . This piezo-electric element  7  is provided with electrodes  8   a ,  8   b  on both surfaces. 
     This piezo-electric element  7  is used in such a d33-mode that the piezo-electric element  7  is expanded upon the application of the voltage. The head can be remarkably reduced in its manufacturing costs because of the piezo-electric element  7  constituting a part of the wall member of the pressure chamber  6 . 
     FIG. 12 shows a drive waveform when the first embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1 is applied to the head in this d33-mode. That is, the voltage V 5  is applied in the initial state. With this application, as indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 11, the piezo-electric element  7  expands, and the pressure chamber  6  remains shrunk. 
     When jetting out the inks, the drive voltage is decreased with an inclination in a 0v-direction. The piezo-electric element  7  is thereby contracted enough to cause a negative pressure within the pressure chamber  6 . Therefore, the inks are sucked in the nozzle  1 . When the drive voltage becomes 0v, the piezo-electric element  7  is expanded. Consequently, the drive voltage is raised with a steep inclination toward the positive voltage V 4 . 
     The drive voltage, when coming to V 4 , rises with a gentle inclination toward V 5 . 
     In this embodiment also, as in the first embodiment, the operations shown in FIGS. 3A to  3 D are executed. This embodiment also exhibits the same operating effects as those in the first embodiment. Further, the third and fourth embodiment are applicable thereto. 
     FIG. 13 is a diagram showing one example of a drive circuit according to the present invention. FIG. 14 is a time chart thereof. In accordance with this embodiment, dotwise gradations are expressed by changing the applied voltage per nozzle. 
     Referring to FIG. 13, a ROM  20  stores data for generating gradation drive waveform. Digital/analog (D/A) converters  30 - 32  convert drive data given from the ROM  20  into an analog quantity. Integrating circuits  33 - 35  integrate outputs of the D/A converters  30 - 32 . Amplifier circuits  36 - 38  amplify outputs of the integrating circuits  33 - 35 . 
     Print waveform generating units  21 - 23  generate drive waveforms different from each other, and are constructed of D/A converters  30   32 , the integrating circuits  33 - 35  and the amplifier circuits  36 - 38 . 
     Piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are provided corresponding respective nozzles and drive the pressure chamber. Switching circuits  61 - 6   n  provided corresponding to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n , select the drive waveforms given from the print waveform generating units  21 - 23  in accordance with selection signals from a drive waveform selecting unit  24 , and apply them to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n.    
     The drive waveform selecting unit  24  comprises a decoder  40 , a shift register  41  and a register  42 . The decoder  40  converts a 2-bit gradation data signal indicating a value of gradation of each dot from an unillustrated print control unit, into a parallel 3-bit decode signal. The shift register  41  consists of a 3n-bit shift register and takes in the decode signal in response to sampling clock signal generated dotwise. The register  42  is constructed of a 3n-bit register and latches a content of the shift register  41  in response to a latch clock signal generated for every n-dots. 
     An operation thereof will be explained. Under the control of the unillustrated print control unit, the ROM  20  outputs three kinds of m-bit drive waveform-generating data to three print waveform generating units  21 - 23 . The D/A converters  30 - 32  in the print waveform generating units  21 - 23  generate voltages corresponding to data signals thereof. Then, the integrating circuits  33 - 35  integrate the thus generated voltages and output the drive waveforms. The drive waveforms may be determined by a time and voltage levels of the D/A converters  30 - 32 , and integration constants of the integrating circuits  33 - 35 . Outputs of the integrating circuits  33 - 35  are amplified by the amplifier circuits  36 - 38  and outputted to the switching circuits  61 - 6   n.    
     On the other hand, the 2-bit gradation data signals indicating the values of the gradations of the respective dots to be jetted, are inputted to the decoder  40  and converted into 3-bit decode signals. Respective bits of these signals correspond to switches in the switching circuits  61 - 6   n . Then, the 3-bit decode signals are outputted corresponding to the gradation data signals in such a state that 1 bit of the 3 bits is invariably ON, or all the bits are OFF. 
     Those 3-bit decode signals are sequentially taken into the shift register  41  in response to the sampling clock signals. When the signals of all the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are taken into the shift register  41 , a content of the shift register  41  is held by the register  42  in response to a latch clock signal. Then, the shift register  41  comes to a status of waiting for inputting a next print signal. 
     The signals held by the register  42  are outputted to the switching circuits  61 - 6   n  connected to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n . In the switching circuits  61 - 6   n , one of the three switches is turned ON, or alternatively all the switches are brought into an OFF-state in response those signals. 
     Owing to this operation, the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are in such a state that a drive waveform for no printing is not applied, or that one of the drive waveforms for jetting a high density dot, a normal density dot and a low density dot from the print waveform generating unit  21 - 23 , is applied. 
     A further explanation is given referring to FIG.  14 . The gradation data signals are defined as 2-bit signals and have values of “0”-“3”. Then, all the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are supplied with each of these signals. These signals indicate densities of the inks jetted by the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  when jetting out the inks next time. For example, if the gradation data signal is the 2-bit signal, this indicates four categories such as “no printing”, “high density”, “normal density” and “low density”. 
     The decoder  40  converts the gradation data signal into a 3-bit decode signal. The converted gradation data signal is taken into the shift register  41  in response to the sampling clock signal. After all the gradation data signals have been taken into the shift register  41 , a content of the shift register  41  is copied on the register  42  in response to a latch signal. The signal of the register  42  selects the switch of the switching circuits  61 - 6   n.    
     The ROM  20  outputs the drive data relative to “high density”, “normal density” and “low density” to the print waveform generating units  21 - 23 . Signals for changing the waveform voltages, which are being outputted at present, are outputted from outputs of the D/A converters  30 - 32 . A velocity of these changes may be determined by values of the voltages outputted by the D/A converters  30 - 32 . Further, a time for increasing the output voltage may be determined by a signal output time width of the D/A converters  30 - 32 . 
     FIG. 14 shows a drive waveform as a combination of the drive waveforms in the second and third embodiments discussed above. When a time t 6  is set to “0”, however, it shows the drive waveform in the third embodiment. When a time t 7  is set to “0”, it shows the drive waveform in the second embodiment. If the time t 6  and the time t 7  are set to “0”, it shows the drive waveform in the first embodiment. 
     Thus, the print waveform generating units  21 - 23  generate the drive waveforms in three kinds of gradations. Along with this, the switching circuits  61 - 6   n  connected to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are selected corresponding to the gradation data signals. The drive waveforms designated by the gradation data signals are thereby applied to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n . Therefore, the ink particles having ink quantities corresponding to the gradations are jetted out of the nozzles driven by the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n.    
     FIG. 15 is a circuit diagram illustrating another drive circuit for the embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 15, the same components as those shown in FIG. 13 are marked with the like numerals. In this embodiment, the single print waveform generating unit  21  generates the drive waveform for jetting out the ink particles with a certain gradation. The print waveform generating unit  21  changes the drive waveform a gradation-number of times and outputs them, thus performing the dotwise gradations. 
     Switches  6 - 1  to  6 -n are provided corresponding to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n , and determine whether or not the drive waveforms are applied to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n . Under the control of the unillustrated print control unit, the ROM  20  sequentially outputs three kinds of m-bit drive waveform generation data to the single print waveform generating unit  21 . In the print waveform generating unit  21 , the D/A converter  30  generates a voltage corresponding to this data signal. Then, the integrating circuit  33  integrates the voltage generated and output a drive waveform. The drive waveform may be determined by a time and a voltage level of the D/A converter  30 , and an integration constant of the integrating circuit  33 . The output of the integrating circuit  33  is amplified by the amplifier circuit  36  and outputted to each of the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n.    
     On the other hand, a 1-bit print selection signal indicating an ON/OFF state of each nozzle to jet the inks is sequentially taken into the shift register  41  in response to the sampling clock signal. When the signals of all the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are taken into the shift register  41 , a content of the shift register  41  is held by the register  42  in response to the latch clock signal. Then, the shift register  41  comes to a status of waiting for inputting the next print signal. 
     The signals held by the register  42  are outputted to the switches  6 - 1  through  6 -n connected to the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n . The switches  6 - 1  to  6 -n are controlled ON or OFF by these signals. 
     Owing to this operation, the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n  are in such a state that the drive waveform for no printing is not applied, or that the drive waveform from the print waveform generating unit  21  is applied. This drive waveform sequentially changes to drive waveforms for jetting the high density dot, the normal density dot and the low density dot. 
     The ROM  20  sequentially outputs the drive data relative to “high density”, “normal density” and “low density” to the print waveform generating unit  21 , and hence the drive waveform changes corresponding to the gradations. In the drive waveform for each gradation, the print selection signal is set ON/OFF, whereby drive signal for a designated gradation are applied to the designated piezo electric elements  51 - 5   n . The ink particles for expressing the designated gradation can be thereby jetted out of the nozzles drive by the piezo-electric elements  51 - 5   n.    
     Next, a relationship between an ambient temperature and an ink jetting quantity will be explained. 
     FIG. 16 is a graph showing a relationship between a temperature and an ink viscosity. FIG. 17 is a graph showing a relationship between a temperature and a piezo-electric element displacement quantity. FIG. 18 is a graph showing a drive waveform when compensating the temperature. FIG. 19 is a graph showing a relationship between the temperature and the ink jetting quantity. FIG. 20 is a graph showing a construction of the head according to the present invention. FIG. 21 is a graph showing a construction of a head drive circuit according to the present invention. 
     As shown in FIG. 16, as seen in the relationship between the temperature and the ink viscosity, the ink viscosity becomes lower as the temperature gets higher. Further, as shown in FIG. 17, according to the relationship between the temperature and the piezo-electric element displacement quantity, the displacement quantity of the piezo-electric element becomes greater as the temperature rises. 
     Hence, as indicated by a dotted line in FIG. 19, the ink jetting quantity becomes larger at higher temperatures. Namely, the displacement quantity of the piezo-electric element is small at a low temperature, and the ink viscosity increases, resulting in a decrease in the ink jetting quantity. Therefore, a print density is lowered. Reversely, the displacement quantity of the piezo-electric element augments at a high temperature, and the ink viscosity decreases, resulting in increase in the ink jetting quantity. Therefore, the print density increases. 
     Prevention of the variations in the ink jetting quantity with respect to the temperature may involve changing the drive signal corresponding to the temperature. This might need to prepare various items of drive data corresponding to the temperatures. The preparation for the various items of drive data corresponding to the temperatures may be time-consuming, and, besides, the ROM  20  is required to have a storage space. 
     For preventing this, in accordance with this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 18, the amplitude of the drive signal is varied without changing the drive data (drive patterns). More specifically, as shown in FIG. 18, the amplitude of the drive signal is increased when at a low temperature but decreased when at a high temperature. 
     With this setting, as indicated by a solid line in FIG. 19, the ink jetting quantity can be uniformalized irrespective of the head temperatures. 
     FIGS. 20 and 21 show a method of actualizing this without changing the drive data. As illustrated in FIG. 20, an ink jet head  13  is provided with four nozzle units  12  arranged in side-by-side relationship. A printed board  14  of this head  13  is provided with a temperature detecting device  15 . The temperature detecting device  15  constructed of a thermistor is provided in the vicinity of the head  13  and works to detect a temperature of the head  13 . 
     As shown in FIG. 21, the head drive circuit is constructed of a reference voltage generating circuit  46 , an amplitude voltage generating circuit  45 , a drive waveform generating circuit  39  and an amplifier circuit  36 . The reference voltage generating circuit  46  generates a reference voltage Vr for the amplitude voltage generating circuit  45 . 
     The amplitude voltage generating circuit  45  is constructed of a multiplication type digital/analog (D/A) converter. The amplitude voltage generating circuit  45  to which amplitude data Dg indicating an amplitude voltage is inputted, generates an amplitude voltage Vg having a magnitude corresponding to the amplitude data Dg. 
     The amplitude data Dg is given from the unillustrated print control circuit. The print control circuit determines the amplitude data Dg from a detection output of the temperature detecting device  15 , and output it to the amplitude voltage generating circuit  45 . The print control circuit, as shown in FIG. 18, determines the amplitude data Dg in accordance with a temperature detected by the temperature detecting device  15 . For instance, when at the low temperature, the amplitude is increased but deceased when at the high temperature. 
     The drive waveform generating circuit  39  is, as illustrated in FIG. 13, constructed of a multiplication type Digital/Analog (D/A) converter and an integrating circuit. Then, the multiplication type D/A converter executes a D/A conversion of drive data (waveform data) Dw, wherein the amplitude voltage of the amplitude voltage generating circuit  45  serves as a reference voltage. The drive data Dw is, as shown in FIG. 13, outputted from the ROM  20 . 
     An output of this multiplication type D/A converter is integrated by the integrating circuit, thereby generating a drive signal Vw. Then, the drive signal Vw is amplified by the amplifier circuit  36 , and an output signal Vout is outputted to the piezo-electric element. 
     Thus, the drive data (the waveform data) is not changed, whereas only the amplitude of the drive signal is varied. Therefore, the various items of drive data corresponding to the temperatures are not required. Accordingly, neither the various items of drive data corresponding to the temperatures may be prepared, nor the capacity of the ROM  20  is increased. 
     If a correction of the ink jetting quantity according to the temperature is executed during printing of a page, it follows that a print density might change halfway the page. For this reason, it is required that an interpage correction be executed. 
     Given next is an explanation of how the ink jetting quantity is controlled corresponding to sheets. 
     An affinity between a print medium and the ink may be a compatibility of both of the ink and the print medium. Therefore, an ink impregnation quantity might change depending on the kinds of the inks and the print mediums. Hitherto, the inks and the print mediums used by the apparatus were limited to avoid changes in the ink impregnation quantity. 
     There is still, however, a demand for using a variety of print mediums. Hitherto, a decline in the print quantity could not be avoided in print mediums other than the limited ones. Especially when printed on the reproduced paper, blurs are easy to appear along fibers of the paper. Further, when printed on the coat paper, the blurs are also easy to appear depending on the compatibility with the ink. 
     Such being the case, an optimal print state is obtained by changing the ink jetting quantity corresponding to the sheet to be used. 
     FIG. 22 is a block diagram illustrating a construction of a print system according to the present invention. FIGS. 23A and 23B are diagrams each showing a relationship between the sheet and a printed result. 
     A printer apparatus  7  is provided with an image file  71  constructed of a ROM or a hard disk. The image file  71  is stored with print samples when printed on a typical record sheet. As illustrated in FIG. 23A, there is prepared a print sample in which a kanji-character “odoroku” (which literally means “surprise”) is printed on the reproduced paper in the case of setting the ink quantity to “large”, “intermediate” and “small”. As illustrated in FIG. 23B, there is prepared a print sample in which the kanji-character “odoroku” is printed on the coat paper in the case of setting the ink quantity to “large”, “intermediate” and “small”. Then, these print samples are stored in the image file  71 . 
     An operation panel  72  comprises a switch for selecting types of the record sheets, a display unit (e.g., a liquid crystal panel) for displaying the print sample of the selected record sheet, and a switch for selecting an ink jetting quantity by picking up a proper image quality from the display thereof. 
     A print data processing unit  70  processes the print data given from a host computer  80 . For example, the print data processing unit  70  converts the print data into image data. An ink jetting quantity calculating unit  73  calculates ink jetting quantity control data corresponding to the ink jetting quantity designated by the operation panel  72 . A head control unit  74  generates the above-described drive waveform in accordance-with the ink jetting quantity control data, and controls a printer printing unit  75  in accordance with the print data. The printer printing unit  75  is defined as the ink jet head described above. 
     An operation thereof will be explained. The print data processing unit  70  creates entire or some parts of image to be printed in conformity of a command input from the host computer  80 . The ink jetting quantity calculating unit  73  calculates the ink jetting quantity in accordance with this image. The head control unit  74  generates the drive waveform corresponding to the ink jetting quantity and executes printing by controlling the printer printing unit  75 . 
     On this occasion, an operator inputs the type of the sheet to be used, from the operation panel  72 . The print sample for the inputted sheet is thereby read from the image file  71 . This print sample is displayed on the display unit of the operation panel  72 . If the sheet is designated to, e.g., the reproduced paper, there are displayed three print samples when the ink quantity is “small”, “intermediate” and “large” in the case of the reproduced paper shown in FIG.  23 A. Further, if the sheet is designated to the coat paper, there are displayed the three print samples when the ink quantity is “small”, “intermediate” and “large” in the case of the coat paper shown in FIG.  23 B. 
     The operator selects a favorite image quality by seeing the display content. Then, one of “large”, “intermediate” and “small” quantities of the inks is inputted through the switch of the operation panel  72 . The ink jetting quantity calculating unit  73  calculates the ink jetting quantity in accordance with the thus selected ink quantity, and controls the head control unit  74 . 
     Referring to FIGS. 23A and 23B, the “intermediate” quantity of the inks is set for the ink jet record sheet. As can be understood from FIGS. 23A and 23B, hairlines and blurs are conspicuous in the case of being set to the “intermediate” quantity of the inks. It can be recognized that the image quality is improved by setting the ink quantity to “small”. 
     Thus, it is feasible to obtain a printed result of the optimal image quality corresponding to the type of the record sheet. The number of types of the record sheets used for the ink jet printer can be thereby increased. Further, the image quality is displayed before printing, and hence a trial print is unnecessary, whereby futilities of the record sheets and the inks can be prevented. 
     Next, there will be described another print system for obtaining the optimal print state by changing the ink jetting quantity in accordance with the sheet to be used. 
     FIG. 24 is a diagram illustrating a construction of another print system according to the present invention. 
     A host computer  80  is provided with the image file  71  constructed of the ROM or the hard disk. The image file  71  is stored with the print samples when printed on a typical record sheet. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 23A, there is prepared the print sample of being printed on the reproduced paper in the case of setting the ink quantity to “large”, “intermediate” and “small”. As illustrated in FIG. 23B, there is prepared the print sample of being printed on the coat paper in the case of setting the ink quantity to “large”, “intermediate” and “small”. 
     An operation panel  82  comprises a switch for selecting types of the record sheets, a display unit (e.g., a monitor display) for displaying the print sample of the selected record sheet, and a switch for selecting an ink jetting quantity by picking up a proper image quality from the display thereof. 
     A printer driver (software)  83  incorporates a print image creating function and a print density command creating function. The print image creating function creates the print image of the printer. The print density command creating function creates a command of the print density of the printer in accordance with an indication of the ink jetting quantity from the operation panel  82 . 
     The print data processing unit  70  processes the print data (including the ink jetting quantity) given from the printer driver  83  of the host computer  80 . The head control unit  74  generates the above drive waveform on the basis of the ink jetting quantity control data, and controls the printer printing unit  75  on the basis of the print data. The printer printing unit  75  is defined as the ink jet head described above. 
     An operation thereof will be explained. The print data processing unit  70  creates entire or some parts of image to be printed on the basis of the print data from the host computer  80 . The head control unit  74  generates the drive waveform corresponding to the ink jetting quantity and executes printing by controlling the printer printing unit  75 . 
     In advance of this processing, the operator inputs the type of the sheet to be used, from the operation panel  82 . The print sample for the inputted sheet is thereby read from the image file  81 . This print sample is displayed on the display unit (a monitor) of the operation panel  82 . If the sheet is designated to, e.g., the reproduced paper, there are displayed three print samples when the ink quantity is “small”, “intermediate” and “large” in the case of the reproduced paper shown in FIG.  23 A. Further, if the sheet is designated to the coat paper, there are displayed the three print samples when the ink quantity is “small”, “intermediate” and “large” in the case of the coat paper shown in FIG.  23 B. 
     The operator selects a favorite image quality by seeing the display content. Then, one of “large”, “intermediate” and “small” quantities of the inks is inputted through the switch of the operation panel  82 . The print density command creating function of the printer driver  83  creates the print density command (the ink jetting quantity) in accordance with the selection of the ink quantity. Then, the print density command is outputted together with the print data to the printer  7 . 
     Thus, the printed result exhibiting the optimal image quality corresponding to the type of the record sheet can be obtained. The number of types of the record sheets used for the in jet printer can be thereby incremented. Further, the trial print or the like is unnecessary because of displaying the image quality before printing. Moreover, the host computer holds the sample images requiring a large storage capacity, and hence the printer body is not required to have a large capacity memory. 
     In addition to the embodiments discussed above, the present invention can be modified as follows: 
     (1) The driving method has been described by way of the three embodiments. For instance, however, a combination of the second embodiment with the third embodiment can be carried out. 
     (2)The ink jet head has been explained by way of the heads shown in FIGS. 2 and 11 but may be applied to other forms. 
     The present invention has been discussed so far by way of the embodiments. A variety of modifications can be carried out within the range of the gist of the present invention, and these modifications are not excluded from the scope of the present invention. 
     As explained above, the present invention exhibits the following effects. 
     (1) The movement quantity of the meniscus is fixed when sucking the inks, and hence it is feasible to prevent a disturbance of scatter of the ink particles and the decrease in the velocity. 
     (2) There is controlled the movement quantity when abruptly moving the meniscus toward the outlet of the nozzle at the time of jetting out the inks, and therefore the variation width of the ink particle quantity can be enlarged.