Abstract:
One or more identified biologically pure strains of Actinomycete isolated from ATCC 55984 and methods of using the strains. The strains are used to confer protection against plant pathogen infection in a susceptible plant and are also used to enhance growth in a responsive plant. The methods of use include contacting at least a plant part, soil or soil-less potting mixture with a composition that includes at least one of the identified strains of Actinomycetes.

Description:
RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims the priority of Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/052,129, entitled Biological Control Of Fungal Diseases And Other Pests As Well As Crop Improvements By Individual Or Mixed Cultures Of Streptomyces Sp., Or Other Similar Actinomycetes Or Their Genes, filed Jul. 10, 1997. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to new strains of actinomycetes including Streptomyces bacteria that are capable of inhibiting the growth of soil borne plant pathogens and thereby enhancing plant growth. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to the control of fungal and/or bacterial infections of plants by actinomycetes that are antagonistic to, or produce materials antagonistic to undesired fungi or bacteria. 
     Fungal or bacterial phytopathogens are a cause of substantial economic losses in the agriculture, forestry, and horticulture industries. It is estimated that approximately four billion dollars are lost annually to disease. Many types of plant pathogens have been described including those that cause disease symptoms called damping-off, root-rot, wilt, blights, or stem and leaf rots. Such diseases can kill emerging seedlings, reduce plant robustness, and adversely affect crop yields. 
     Traditionally, breeding for resistant plants, sterilizing the soil either physically (e.g. steam) or chemically (e.g. methyl bromide fumigation) or chemical fungicide application has been attempted for control of phytopathogens. However, each of these methods has serious drawbacks. Completely resistant cultivars have not been developed. Soil sterilization is expensive and removes beneficial microorganisms that naturally compete against phytopathogens. Methyl bromide fumigation is being regulated out of existence. The use of chemical fungicides or bacteriostats to control phytopathogens has come under closer scrutiny due to their expense, lack of efficacy, limited effective duration, emergence of resistant pathogens, and regulation. Additionally, the use of chemicals for pathogen eradication is not desirable due to their toxicity to humans and the environment. 
     Biological control of plant pathogens is defined as the use of one or more biological processes to lower inoculum density of the pathogen or reduce its disease producing activities. The mechanisms underlying these processes include competitive exclusion of the pathogens(s), antibiosis, mycoparasitism, or induced resistance of the plant. 
     Microbial control as a means for protecting plants from pathogens provides an advantage over traditional control measures in that the biocontrol microorganisms grow and proliferate under conditions favorable for plant growth. Thus the effective concentration of the control agent can increase during the growing season, rather than decrease, as occurs with chemical control measures. The environment is not unduly degraded, and may in fact be upgraded, in that these microorganisms are a natural constituent of the environment and supply essential nutrient cycling functions. Due to the multiple mechanistic nature of biological control, the possibility of pathogens acquiring resistance to these controls are either eliminated (competitive exclusion, mycoparasitism) or drastically reduced (antibiosis). Furthermore, it is an established fact that plants may acquire microbial-mediated resistance factors towards the pathogen (induced resistance), thus providing a secondary defense mechanism. 
     Members of the Actinomycetales family are especially useful as biological agents for reducing phytopathogen infection in that they produce over 60% of the approximately 5,000 known antibiotics, some strains synthesizing 30 or more including many with fungicidal activity. They produce an enormous diversity of hydrolytic enzymes including enzymes that degrade fungal cell wall components, such as chitinases, cellulases, and glucanases. They are heterotrophically diverse, as they are evolutionarily adapted for growth in the soil or in close proximity to plant roots utilizing a wide range of carbon sources. They produce spores under environmental deleterious conditions. They grow vegetatively as mycelia, thus allowing root colonization and translocation of nutrients over relatively large distances. 
     The object of the present invention is to provide a new biological control means of reducing fungal or bacterial pathogen infection of plants. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention has been achieved by the isolation of a number of actinomycete bacteria that have been screened against specific phytopathogens and are effective in inhibiting their growth. These actinomycetes hereby described and identified herein and referred to as IBS-24, are biologically pure cultures and have been deposited on Jun. 19, 1997 as a single effective mixture at American Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va., 20110-2209, and identified as ATCC 55984. 
     The present invention also sets forth various compositions suitable for treating soil, seeds, plant roots, soil-less potting mixtures, other plant parts, or foliage of plants. Such compositions maintain the viability of the active antagonist component or substance, can be effectively applied to soil, seed, roots, or foliage, provide mineral or nutrient sources for the germination and vegetative growth of the actinomycetes, and reduce the susceptibility of plants to fungal or bacterial infections. 
     In an exemplary embodiment, such compositions comprise a biologically pure strain or mixture of actinomycete strains and a delivery medium. A soluble medium includes the actinomycete spores homogeneously mixed with dry powdered milk or powdered whey at a spore concentration of 1×10 8  colony forming units (CFU)/g medium. The delivery medium serves as a physical support for the bacteria and as a carbon and nitrogen source for spore germination and vegetative proliferation of the bacteria once wetted. Once solubilized, this composition may be incorporated into a drench treatment utilizing existing drench equipment, for example, on turf or plant nursery stock. The composition may also be used directly to coat seeds, roots, soil or soil-less mixture, or foliage, either in its dry or solubilized form. 
     In another embodiment, the compositions comprise a biologically pure strain or mixture of actinomycete strains in an insoluble delivery medium. The delivery medium may be, for example, zeolite or talc. In one embodiment, the medium comprises spores at a concentration of 1×10 6  CFU/g medium to 1×10 8  CFU/g medium. The composition may be dusted on plant roots, amended directly into soil or soil-less potting mixtures, or applied to seeds or foliage. 
     In another embodiment, the compositions comprising a pure actinomycete spore culture or cultures may be combined with supplements to enhance plant growth, such as fertilizers or other forms of plant nutrients. Other supplements to further reduce pest or disease damage may also be utilized including chemical pesticides, fungicides, or other biological control agents. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the steps to accomplish the isolation of individual strains of Actinomycete of the present invention out of the consortiom deposit ATCC 55984. 
     FIG. 2 is a dendogram generated from fatty acid profiles demonstrating that the strains of Actinomycete in the present invention are unique from each other, based on the dendogram and additional factors. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention describes the isolation of a number of actinomycete strains from soil and plant rhizosphere. Twenty four actinomycete strains are described herein and have been submitted as a consortium as ATCC 55984. The described isolated strains show a high level of antagonism towards plant pathogens, possess prolific spore generation, and have desirable physiological and morphological dissimilarities. It is believed that mutants of the described strains possess the same properties and substantially the same identifiable characteristics and would therefore represent a biologically same strain as the numbered strains described herein. It is highly unlikely that any two of these strains are clones in that over 4000 different genomes may be present in a single gram of soil. Also, these strains were isolated under differing culture conditions and from different plant roots, soils, and locations as shown in Table 1 below. Soil and rhizosphere samples were air-dried, homogenized, and serially diluted onto the specific isolation agar. Colonies exhibiting actinomycete morphology were picked from agar plates and re-streaked for isolation onto PDA to verify purity. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________IsolatedStrain .sup.1 Temp (° C.)            .sup.2 Location                      .sup.3 Media                             .sup.4 Niche                                    .sup.5 Trt______________________________________125    30        A         PDA    1      No226    30        B         SPA    1      No230    30        C         PDA    1      No278    30        D         PDA    1      No302    30        E         PDA    1      No333    30        F         PDA    1      No506    100       G         YCED   1      No529    40        H         GA     1      No541    40        H         GA     1      No560    40        I         GA     2      No568    40        J         H.sub.2 O                             3      No588    40        K         H.sub.2 O                             4      No611    50        L         H.sub.2 O                             5      No619    25        J         PDA    3      No642    25        M         PDA    6      No643    25        N         GA     7      No668    50        O         PDA    8      No718    110       P         SC     9      No736    25        P         HVSE   9      M6737    25        P         ND     9      M2738    25        P         LVSE   9      M6739    25        P         LVSE   9      M6741    25        P         HVSE   9      M7762    110       Q         HVSE   10     M6______________________________________ .sup.1 Temperature (° C.) at which the soil samples containing presumptive actinomycetes were pretreated prior to dilution plating and isolation. .sup.2 Location from which the actinomycetes were collected. A Nevada desert soil, BF Priest River Experimental forest floor, Priest River, Idaho. Each letter indicates a different location within the forest, as denoted by a number. B location #5, C location #6, D location #21, E location #29, F location #34. GH naturally suppressive soil, potato field Idaho Experiment Station, Aberdeen, ID. G location #1, H location #2. IO # Vegetable trial plots, each letter indicating a different position in the field. I location #11, J location #13, K location #26, L location #32 M location #28, N location #1, O location #3. PQ organic garden, Moscow, ID. P location #1, Q location #2. .sup.3 Media which the actinomycetes were initially isolated on. PDA, potato dextrose agar (Sigma). SPA, sporulation agar consisting of yeast extract (1.0 g/L), tryptose (2.0 g/L), glucose (10.0 g/L), beef extract (1.0 g/L), FeSO.sub.4 (trace), and agar (18.0 g/L), pH adjusted to 7.0. YCED, yeast extract, casamino acids, dextrose containing yeast extract (0.3 g/L), casamino acids (0.3 g/L), Dglucose (0.3 g/L), K.sub.2 HPO.sub. (2.0 g/L) and agar (18.0 g/L), pH 7.0.  # GA, glucose asparagine consisting of glucose (10.0 g/L), asparagine (0.5 g/L), K.sub.2 HPO.sub.4 (0.5 g/l), agar (18.0 g/L), pH 7.0. H.sub.2 O, water agar consisting of water (1.0 L) and agar (18.0 g/L). SC, starch casein agar consisting of soluble starch (10.0 g/L), casein (1.0 g/L), K.sub.2 HOP.sub.4 (0.5 g/L) and agar (18.0 g/L) pH 7.0. HVSE, humic acid, vitamin, soil extract agar consisting of humic acid (1.0 g/L), Na.sub.2 HPO.sub.4 (0.5 g/l), KCl (1. g/L),  # MgSO.sub.4 7H.sub.2 O (0.05 g/L), FeSO.sub.4 7H.sub.2 O (0.01 g/L), CaCO.sub.3 (0.02 g/L), yeast extract (0.15 g/l), and soil extract (50.0 g soil in 500 ml water, steam heated for one hour, filtrate used as the amendment), 100 ml/L. ND, not determined. LVSE, lignin, vitamin, soil extract agar consisting of all constituents of HVSE agar with lignin substituted for humic acid. These media are primarily used for actinomycete isolation from environmental samples. .sup.4 Environmental niche from which the actinomycetes were initially isolated. 1 bulk soil, 2 garbonzo bean rhizosphere, 3 Spanish brown lenti rhizosphere, 4 blackeye pea variety #1 rhizosphere, 5 lettuce rhizosphere 6 blackeye pea variety #2 rhizosphere, 7 Oregon sugar pod pea rhizosphere 8 Columbia pea rhizosphere, 9 tomato rhizosphere, 10 basil rhizosphere. .sup.5 Chemical or antibiotic treatment used for actinomycete isolation. Each class of treatment is semiselective for a different group of actinomycete. M6 nystatin (50 μg/ml), cycloheximide (50 μg/ml), and nalidixic acid (20 μg/ml). M2 nystatin (50 μg/ml),cyclohexamide (50 μg/ml), norfloxacine (20 μg/ml), nalidixic acid (20 μg/ml), and polymyxin B (5 μg/ml).  # M7 nystatin (50 μg/ml), cycloheximide (50 μg/ml), nalidixic acid (20 μg/ml), and novobiocin (20 μg/ml). After autoclaving each of these antibiotics were added to the specified media to the final concentration indicated in parentheses. 
    
     The actinomycete strains of the present invention are potent biological control agents. These strains effectively inhibit the growth of a diversity of fungal and bacterial plant pathogens. They exhibit strong antagonism towards a wide range of pathogens causing pre- and post-emergence damping off of seedlings, root rot, blights, molds, crown rot, bacterial spot and wilt. Antagonism bioassays were employed as a screening procedure to determine growth inhibition of a large number of virulent plant pathogens, table 2. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Plant pathogen         Disease, host plant______________________________________Fusarium oxysporum         Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato,         damping off and root rot of conifers,         root rot and basal bulb rot of onionRhizoctonia solani         Damping-off, root rot, and basal stem rot of         tomato, damping off of conifersWhetzelinia sclerotiorum         White mold of tomatoAlternaria solani         Early blight, tomatoPhytopthora infestans         Late blight, potatoGauemannomyces graminis         Take-all, wheat, turfColletotrichum spp.         Black dot, anthracnose, potatoPythium ultimum         Damping-off, eggplant, conifersSclerotium cepivorum         White-rot, onionPyrenochaeta terrestris         Pink-root, onionMacrophomina phaseolina         Charcoal root rot, coniferHeterobasidion annosum         White rot, coniferBotrytis cinerea         Gray mold, conifer; Botrytis bunch rot,         grapesPhytopthora pseudotsugae         Root rot, coniferPhytopthora cryptogea         Root rot, coniferStreptomyces scabies         Potato scabiesXanthomonas campestris         Bacterial spot, tomatoBurkholderia solanacearum         Bacterial wilt, tomatoBurkholderia syringae         Bacterial wilt, tomatoArmillaria ostyoae         Shoestring root rot, coniferSclerotinia homoeocarpa         Dollar spot, turfRhizoctonia solani         Brown patch or Rhizoctonia blight, turfPythium aphanidermatum         Pythium blight, turfMicrodochium nivale         Snow mold, turfAphanomyces euteiches         Root rot, pea______________________________________ 
    
     These pathogens include those that are most problematic to the agriculture, forest, and horticulture industries. Some of these pathogens do not currently have effective chemical controls (e.g. Sclerotium and Aphanomyces) or current chemical control measures directed against the pathogen will be terminated (e.g. bare-root nursery conifer pathogens such as Pythium, Fusarium, and Rhizoctonia). 
     The in vitro antagonism bioassay used to determine fungal pathogen inhibition considered of spot inoculating of the particular actinomycete spores, in triplicate, 10 mm from the center of a petri plate containing PDA. The spores were allowed to germinate and grow for seven days at 30° C. At this time, a 5 mm square fungal plug cut from an actively growing fungal culture was aseptically placed upside down in the center of the actinomycete-inoculated plate. The cultures were incubated at room temperature until the mycelia of the pathogen control plate (containing pathogen only) grew to the outer plate boundary. At this time, the fungal inhibition zone was measured. Bacterial pathogen bioassays consisted of inoculating a line of actinomycete spores down the center of a PDA plate extending to the plate&#39;s edge. Bacterial pathogens were inoculated perpendicular to the actinomycete line of spores adjacent to this line and extending to the plate&#39;s edge. The zone of inhibition was measured from the actinomycete growth line. Table 3 illustrates the range in antagonism of each member of ATCC 55984 elicited against nine of the tested pathogens. 
     
                                           TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________    F.Isolated    oxysporum    P.  H.   S.              P.   X.   B.strain #    9051C    ultimum        annosum             cepivorum                  Rhizoctonia                        .sup.1 FORL B                             terrestris                                  campestris                                       solanacearum__________________________________________________________________________125 .sup.2 6    1   1    5    4     2.5  2    0    0226 6    2   1    0    5.3   4.4  6    0    1.7230 7    2.5 nd   2.8  5     5    5.2  0    0278 6    0   2.4  3    5.1   4.3  2.8  0    0.3302 5    2   2.5  1.8  4.5   3.5  3.1  0    0333 6    3.5 4.2  3    5.9   4.2  4.8  0    0506 6.5  5   5.1  6    10    8    8    0    1529 4.5  7.2 10   5.4  10    8.6  8    0    0541 1    9   7.6  8.4  10    4.2  5.5  0.5  0.7560 5    6.8 10   5.5  10    7.8  5.2  0    0568 5.2  6.1 3.6  5.6  7.5   7    9    0    0588 0.5  2.5 1    3.2  4.9   0    0.5  0    2.7611 6    5   2.9  4    5.4   6    6    0    0619 4    4   2.8  5.5  9     6.5  6.3  3.2  0642 5    5.5 3    3.8  9.5   6    5.9  5.3  0643 7    8   10   7.8  10    8    6.8  0    6668 6    4   10   3.6  4.1   4    2.4  10   10718 4    5   10   3.2  8     6    5.5  0    0736 nd   5   nd   0    0     0    0    0    0737 6    5   3.2  3.2  5     4.5  5    0    8738 nd   0   nd   3    0     0    0    0    0739 nd   8.5 nd   0    nd    0    0    0    0741 nd   0   0    0    0     0    0    0    0762 nd   4   1    5    nd    6    0    10   2.7__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 FORLB, Fusarium oxysporum radicus lycopersici, tomato crown and root rot. .sup.2 Values indicate relative inhibition of the pathogen due to antagonism by the actinomycete strain. A value of ten indicates total inhibition, no growth of the pathogen. A value of zero indicates the fungal colony grew directly adjacent or over the actinomycete colony indicating absence of pathogen inhibition. Intermediate values indicate intermediate antagonism levels. nd, not determined. 
    
     Table 3 is illustrative for three purposes. First, it indicates the high levels of antigonism elicited by these actinomycete strains against a wide variety of virulent pathogens. Second, the table taken in its entirety serves as a taxonomic tool in that each strain within the consortia is characterized by a unique set of measurements, characterizing that strain as a singular individual possessing different properties from all other strains. Third, it illustrates the value and novelty of incorporating mixtures of compatible strains into a single biological control product. One example is given for a mixture designated as AM-3 in the table containing strains 529, 541, and 560. Strain 541 elicits only minor antagonism against F. oxysporum 9051C but strains 529 and 560 elicit moderate to high levels against this pathogen. The situation is reversed in the case of antagonism against S. cepivorum, whereas 541 inhibits the growth of this pathogen almost completely, yet the other two strains show moderate antagonism. P. terrestris is almost completely antagonized by strain 529, but only moderately by 541 and 560. The differential antagonism of a mixture designated as AM-3a in the table comprised of strains 568, 611, and 642 illustrates another example. Strain 642 elicits strong antagonism against the bacterial pathogen X. campestris, whereas 568 and 611 do not affect the growth of this pathogen. Strains 568 and 611 elicit moderate to strong antagonism against the fungal pathogen S. cepivorum, whereas 642 moderately affects the growth of this organism. Due to these types of analyses and others to follow, our in vivo tests utilized mixtures of strains, thus providing a broader range of biological control effects. 
     In order for spore germination and vegetative growth of actinomycetes, water and carbon sources that can be assimilated by the organism must be available at the correct time and place. The heterotrophic ability of actinomycetes is well known. Yet individual strains differ in their ability to assimilate different carbon compounds. Table 4 below illustrates this fact. 
     
                                           TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________.sup.1 Carbon compounds most differentially utilized by the identifiedactinomycete strains   D-   mel-                          α-methyl                                 L-pryo-   ezito  D-      L-   D-        D-   glutamicStrain   se Arbutin     sorbitol         Xylitol             rhamnose                  raffinose                       Stachyose                            mannoside                                 acid__________________________________________________________________________560   2  5   1   1   5    3    3    5    5506   0  0   1   1   3    2    2    2    4541   2  1   5   3   1    5    5    1    1668   1  2   2   1   4    4    3    5    4568   1  0   1   2   4    4    2    4    2643   2  2   2   2   5    3    4    5    5529   0  0   1   1   3    2    2    4    5718   2  3   2   1   4    2    2    4    4762   0  5   0   0   4    5    5    1    3611   5  4   5   5   1    5    5    1    2619   5  2   5   5   1    5    5    1    2__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 100 μl of a spore suspension of each actinomycete stain was inoculated into each well of a single carbon source microtiter plate containing 95 wells with different carbon compounds (Biolog SFP MicroPlat ™, Biolog, Inc.). This was done according to the manufacturer suggestion. Cultures were incubated at 30° C. for one week. Measurement values of growth were based on a 0-5 scale, 0 indicating  #no growth and 5 indicated extensive mycelial ramification and subsequent sporulation. Intermediate values indicate intermediate growth based on relative growth characteristics. 
    
     The measurements indicate a specific carbon source utilization value for each strain, thus providing a &#34;fingerprint&#34; or identification profile unique for each of these organisms. Each strain is clearly unique in its ability to assimilate various carbon compounds. 
     Soils and the rhizospheres of different plants provide distinctly different carbon sources utilized by microorganisms for growth. Those microorganisms or strains that can efficiently capture these often-limited nutrient sources will competitively exclude those that cannot. There is advantage to using a single strain of actinomycete for biological control, but there is also advantage offered by a mixture of actinomycete strains provided as a single biological control formulation. A preferred carbon source of a particular microorganism in the mixture may become limited or may be absent altogether. The plant root&#39;s microenvironment will provide distinct carbon compounds that a different actinomycete strain in the mixture can readily assimilate. This extends the capacity of the biological control formulation to work effectively since a single mixture can protect a wider range of plants. 
     In table 5, antibiotic resistance profiles indicate that each actinomycete strain also possesses a distinct antibiogram. Thus each strain is unique. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes are closely clustered with antibiotic biosynthesis genes in actinomycetes. Therefore those strains eliciting resistance to a variety of antibiotics potentially may synthesize those antibiotics. It is apparent that a number of strains potentially produce a variety of antibiotics. The argument for utilizing mixtures of strains in a biological control formulation becomes apparent in that if one member of the consortium lacks the potential to produce a particular antibiotic that a pathogen may be susceptible to, another strain may synthesize the said antibiotic. 
     
                       TABLE 5______________________________________.sup.1 StrainAnti- 71                                          64biotic 8      643    560  541  529  333  611  588  2______________________________________Ap    200    100    113  200  100  200  28.9 68.4 200Cb    100    100    100  100  60.5 100  100  100  100Cp    100    9.2    31.6 100  10.5 100  104  0    112Ca    0      5.6    21.1 0    0    44.4 0    39.5 0Ct    0      0      0    0    0    0    0    0    0Er    34.2   0      0    76.3 0    27.6 22.4 52.6 32.9Gn    0      0      0    0    0    0    0    0    6.6Kn    0      0      0    0    0    0    0    0    0Ln    200    200    200  200  138  200  200  200  200Nl    0      0      0    0    0    0    0    42.1 0Nm    42.1   0      0    0    0    30.3 35.5 0    0Nf    100    44.7   0    100  0    100  100  100  78.9Nv    0      27.6   32.9 0    7.9  0    0    0    0Ol    100    17.1   46.1 125  19.7 21.1 0    100  100Ox    0      0      0    0    0    21.1 0    22.4 0Pn    0      56.7   44.4 100  12.2 66.7 100  0    39.5Pm    0      15.6   10   143  0    200  100  100  100Rf    0      0      0    0    7.9  0    0    100  0Sr    0      0      0    61.8 0    0    0    0    0Tc    0      0      0    0    0    32.9 0    100  0Tb    0      0      0    22.4 0    0    0    0    0______________________________________ .sup.1 Antibiotic concentrations given in μg/ml. Values indicate the concentration at which the actinomycete strain is resistant to the particular antibiotic. Gradient plate technique used to determine resistance referred to by reference in Eisenstadt, E., et al. 1994. Gene Mutation. In: Methods for General and Molecular Biology. Gerhardt, P., R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood, and N. R. Kreig (eds.). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. p. 304. 
    
     Ap=ampicillin, Cb=carbenicillin, Cp=cephloradine, Ca=chloramphenicol, Ct=chlorotetracycline, Er=erythromycin, Gn=gentamycin, Kn=kanamycin, Ln=lincomycin, Nl=naladixic acid, Nm=neomycin, Nf=norfloxacine, Nv=novabiocin, Ol=oleandomycin, Ox=oxytetracycline, Pn=Penicillin, Pm=polymixin B, Rf=rifampicin, Sr=Streptomycin, Tc=tetracycline, Tb=tobramycin. 
     Spore stock cultures of these actinomycetes may be produced by inoculating, via spread plate, of PDA media is done from archived spore stock cultures. Plates are incubated at 30° C. until the cultures are well sporulated, usually in 2-3 weeks. Spores may then be mixed into a carrier or stored in 20% glycerol at -20° C. Spores will remain viable for months in zeolite at 4 to 25° C. 
     The 24 strains described herein can all be isolated from ATCC deposit 55984. Each of the 24 actinomycete isolates or strains possess unique properties, and taken as a whole this consortium is strongly antagonistic towards a broad range of phytopathogens, and it utilizes many different carbon sources, and it synthesizes a number of antibiotics. Each strain can be isolated and purified from this mixture by utilizing knowledge of each strain&#39;s unique growth habits and antibiotic resistance profiles. FIG. 1 illustrates the manner in which the purification may be accomplished. The labeled arrows indicate the specific media, antibiotic, or culture conditions, which are specific for each individual strain. Antibiotic concentrations are given in parenthesis. Single carbon compounds are supplied as 5% solutions (final concentration), filter sterilized, and amended into an autoclaved base medium comprised of K 2  HPO 4  (0.5 g/L), MgSO 4  7H 2  O (0.2 g/L), NaCl (0.1 g/L), (NH 4 ) 2  SO 4  (0.5 g/L), and yeast extract (trace) pH 7.0. Carbon sources not described in FIG. 1 are specified here as 5% putrescine-HCl or one-half strength PDA. 
     Fatty acid profiles were generated from a number of the strains within the consortia ATCC 55984 by Microbial ID, Inc., Newark, Del. 19711. Library matches to their bacteria database indicated that matches occurred mostly within the Streptomyces genera. (table 6). 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________SUMMARY OF MICROBIAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMStrain #     Identification .sup.1 Similarity Index______________________________________205          Streptoverticillium                       0.022        cinnamonem261          Streptomyces.sup.2 v.                       0.353        violaceusniger333          Streptomyces v..sup.3 h.                       0.324        ossamyceticus503          Streptomyces halstedii                       0.050506          Streptomyces v.                       0.198        violaceusniger515          Streptomyces v.                       0.485        violaceusniger520          Streptomyces halstedii                       0.032529          Streptomyces v.                       0.248        violaceusniger541          Streptomyces halstedii                       0.041560          Streptomyces cyaneus                       0.019575          Streptomyces v.h.                       0.286        ossamyceticus588          Streptomyces lavendulae                       0.473611          Streptomyces v.h.                       0.394        ossamyceticus619          Streptomyces lavendulae                       0.443642          Streptomyces v.h.                       0.343        ossamyceticus643          Streptomyces v.                       0.309        violaceusniger662          Streptomyces v.h.                       0.431        ossamyceticus664          Streptomyces v.                       0.154        violaceusniger718          Streptomyces v.h.                       0.445        ossamyceticus762          Streptomyces v.                       0.411        violaceusniger675          Streptomyces halstedii                       0.074676          Streptomyces v.                       0.450        violaceusnigerEnvironmental Isolate        Streptomyces v.                       0.680        violaceusnigerEnvironmental Isolate        Streptomyces v.                       0.352        violaceusnigerEnvironmental Isolate        Streptomyces anulatus                       0.273______________________________________ .sup.1 Microbial identification is based on a similarity index. The similarity index is a numerical value which expresses how closely the fatty acid composition of an unknown strain compares with the mean fatty acid composition of the strains compiled by Microbial ID, Inc. in their databases. Strains with a similarity of 0.500 or higher indicate good matches. Strains with a similarity index between 0.300 and 0.500 may be a good  # match but is an atypical strain (common with environmental isolates), and values lower than 0.300 suggest the species is not in the database but those listed provide the most closely related species. 
    
     2 v=violaceusniger 
     3 h=halstedii 
     A dendogram was developed describing the relationships between some strains of the consortium ATCC 55984 (FIG. 2). Table 6 and FIG. 2 serve to illustrate that even though strains of the consortia may be members of the same species, they are clearly not the same strains based on calculated euclidian distances, antibiograms, carbon utilization patterns, and antagonism profiles. It is clear that these are unique strains with novel biological control properties. 
     Examples of isolating the described strains from the consortium ATCC 55984 and specific in vitro experiments illustrating the biological control capabilities of this invention are shown by the following examples. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Isolation of a Strain of Actinomycete From ATCC 55984 and Isolation of a Substance From a Strain 
     An example of the method used for isolation of a single strain from the consortium ATCC 55984 (IBS-24) is provided for isolation of strain 643. IBS-24 is plated on agar base medium amended with the single carbon source 3-methyl glucose, 5.0% (final concentration). The plating may be done either as streak inoculation of the entire mixture, or as dilution plating. 3-methyl glucose provides a carbon source specific for strains 643, 529, 718, and 611 (FIG. 1). Plates are incubated at 30° C. for two weeks or until all colonies are well-sporulated. Isolated colonies from either the streak-inoculated plates or the dilution plates are picked and streak-inoculated onto agar media containing novabiocin (25 μg/ml, final concentration) and norfloxacine (40 μg/ml, final concentration). The carbon source for the agar media may be 1/2 strength PDA, or base media consisting of 5% 3-methyl glucose or 5% putrescine-HCl (media amenable to growth of any or all strains within IBS-24 or of strains 643, 529, 718, or 611 as is the case with 3-methyl glucose). The novabiocin and norfloxacine at the specified concentration are specific for isolation of strain 643 due to its tolerance of these antibiotics at the listed concentrations. Plates are incubated for two weeks or until colonies are well-sporulated. At this point, all colonies which become evident are of strain 643 due to its unique physiological growth nature. 
     Additionally, substances characteristic of a strain can be isolated by lysis of a spore or mycelia cell wall and membrane of the strain, and organic acid extraction of the resulting cell constituents, and ethanol precipitation of the aqueous phase of the cell constituents. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     In Vitro Antagonism of Fungal Phytopathogens by Individual Actinomycetes Strains 
     In order to further screen for the biological control potential of the actinomycetes which elicited greatest antagonism against pathogens on the plate antagonism bioassays, thirty-eight actinomycete isolates were mixed as a spore inoculum, into sterilized peat-vermiculite mixture, Black Gold™ (Black Gold, Inc., Hubbard, Oreg.). Fusarium oxysporum Schlechtend.:Fr. f.sp. radicus-lycopersici W. R. Jarvis &amp; Shoemaker (FORLB) chlamydospores to be used for pathogenicity and in vivo antagonism tests were prepared using a modification of the method of James et al. (James et al., 1989). An aluminum metal pan was filled with 75 g of Black Gold potting mix and amended with 75 g yellow corn meal. This material was mixed and autoclaved twice for 45 minutes. Warm, 1% PDA agar was added to the mixture and mixed with 1 cm 2  actively growing agar plugs of Fusarium (two standard PDA plates). The pathogen was grown, covered, for a month at room temperature, air-dried, blended, and its spore population determined by dilution plating onto PDA agar. This method produced viable spores that were stored at room temperature. 
     A single actinomycete (1×10 5  CFU/g final concentration) and fungal spore (1.25×10 3  CFU/g) preparation were combined into the peat-vermiculite mixture. This material was wetted with sterile water under negative pressure in order to hydrate the peat. The mixture was then placed into a wedge within 8L polycarbonate (Nalgene) chambers, with 10 separate treatments/chamber. Air circulation was provided by polyurethane-plugged vents cut into the side and into the removable top plate of the chamber. Surface sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) `Better Boy` seeds were sown into the FORLB treatments (9 seeds/treatment). Controls consisted of unamended peat-vermiculite or pathogen only treatments. Gypsum soil moisture blocks (Davis Instruments, Baltimore, Md., model KS-D1) were placed in each chamber to monitor water potential. 
     Seedlings were grown at room temperature under natural light. Degree of fungal growth and general plant health were visually monitored at periodic intervals, as was seedling emergence. At one month, plants were harvested, the root tips cut (0.5 cm lengths), washed in sterile water, and plated on PDA amended with cyclohexamide and nystatin (50 mg/L) and polymyxin B (5 mg/L). Previous results indicated all actinomycete strains tested were resistant to these antibiotics. Plates were incubated at 30° C. for two weeks and monitored for actinomycete outgrowth from the root tip sections onto the agar surface. Each treatment was analyzed for actinomycete and fungal counts in the bulk soil by dilution plating. 1.5 g of homogeneously mixed treatment soil was placed in 30 ml sterile phosphate buffer (10 -1  dilution) and shaken for 30 minutes on a wrist action shaker. Serial dilutions were performed and suspensions plated on Peptone-PCNB agar (Nash and Snyder, 1962) for fungal counts and PDA amended with cyclohexamide, nystatin, and polymyxin B for actinomycete quantitation. 
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________                                  Actinom   .sup.1 Actino            .sup.2 Fungal  %      ycete   mycete   counts   % Seed                           Seedlin                                  root   CFU/g    CFU/g    germina                           gs Post-                                  colonizaStrain  1 × 10.sup.5            1 × 10.sup.5                     tion  damped tion______________________________________588     27       5        56    100    .sup.3 nd.sup.642     37       31       78    100    nd643     0        25       44    100    nd737     40       10       33    100    nd.sup.4 FORL B   0        38       44    89     no.sup.5 226.sup.   0        10.5     89    33     no278     &gt;300     11.7     67    33     no302     128      7.6      78    33     no333     20       7.7      67    33     yes529     0        4.9      89    44     yes541     186      6.3      100   22     yes560     21       7.0      100   66     yes568     0        8.3      100   89     yes611     0        6.7      89    66     yes619     8        6.0      100   56     no643     0        7.4      89    44     yes668     0        5.6      100   56     yes718     4        6.2      67    78     yes762     1        4.3      78    56     Yes.sup. FORL B   0        5.6      67    89     no______________________________________ .sup.1 Soil dilution plate counts on soilless potting mix, average number of actinomycete colonies recorded at 1 × 10.sup.5 CFU/g. .sup.2 Soil dilution plate counts on soilless potting mix, average number of Fusarium colonies recorded at 1 × 10.sup.5 CFU/g. .sup.3 nd = not determined. .sup.4 Pathogen only control. .sup.5 Second series of experiments performed independently of the other experiments with those strains listed above strain 226 in the table. 
    
     A number of individual actinomycete strains elicited strong in vivo inhibition of Fusarium root rot disease determined by significant increases in percent seed germination and a corresponding decrease in post-damping effects as compared to the Fusarium control plants. A number of these same strains colonize the roots of the tomato seedlings, thus would be prevalent upon seedling transplants. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Summary of Select Field and Greenhouse Trials with Biological Control Actinomycetes 
     Actinomycete isolates were extensively tested in greenhouse and field trials to determine the extent of biological control derived under large-scale practical field conditions. A summary of the benefits in yield, decrease in disease symptoms, or morphological plant gains is illustrated in table 8. 
     
                       TABLE 8______________________________________                   Type of                   Trt. and                         Trend                   strains                         or        $ or % ofCrop   Trial Size           Where   used  Significance                                   Effect______________________________________Potato,  Small Plot           Idaho   Seed  Highest stand                                   Total yieldRusset (35 pieces/           Falls,  piece counts. Highest                                   representsBurbank  trt)     ID      coat  vigor rating. Bot-                                   9.2% in-                   AM-3  tom 1/3 in % Rhi-                                   crease ov-                         zoctonia lesions,                                   er control                         decay, and rot.                                   or approx.                         Increased yield                                   $160/acre.Onion, 42,217   Walla   Drench                         67,400 emergence                                   Emergen-Walla  sets     Walla,  appli-                         counts (treated)                                   ce corres-Walla  planted  WA      cation                         vs. 60,000 for                                   ponds toSweet                   AM-6  control (statisti-                                   $500/acre                         cally significant)                                   increaseRex    3 acres  Palouse Seed  39% increase in                                   Emergen-Yellow                  coat  emergence over                                   ce corres-dry                     AM-6  control (statisti-)                                   ponds to                         cally significant)                                   $3/acre                                   increaseLentils,  6.6 acres           Palouse Seed  8.3% increased                                   $4.4/acreBrewer                  coat  yield over control                                   increase in                   AM-6  (statistically                                   yield                         significant)Grapes,  Small    CA      Phyllo-                         30% decrease in                                   RepresentsJohannes-  field            plane Botrytis bunch                                   $640/acreburg                    spray rot (statistically                                   in valueReisling                AM-6  significant)                                   increase                                   over                                   controlsTomato,  Small    FL      Peat  8.8% increase in`Sunny`  Scale            moss  plant height, 26%  Chamber          appli-                         increase in shoot                   cation                         wt., 1.7 orders of                   AM-3a magnitude de-                         crease in FORL B                         incidenceWestern  Green-   Univ. of                   Peat  52% decrease in                                   $6,500Larch  house    Idaho   moss  Fusarium disease                                   savings  6,400            appli-                         incidence (Stat-                                   per  seedlings        cation                         istically signi-                                   100,000                   AM-4  ficant)   seedlings______________________________________ 
    
     Additional Actinomycete mixtures used in the trials include a mixture of strains 333, 529, 541, 560, 643, and 718, and identified in the table as AM-6. A mixture identified in the table as AM-4 which contained strains 588, 611, 718, and 739 was also tested in this example. 
     Enhancements in plant vigor or yield as a consequence of actinomycete amendment were achieved under pathogen stress. Either field soils were chosen which had been problematic to the host plant in the past due to high pathogen concentrations, or the planting medium and seeds were challenged directly with pathogens. Details of some of these trials follow. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Potato Small Plot Trials 
     Two actinomycete applications were compared to fungicide and pathogen inoculated potatoes in the 1996 potato seedpiece treatment summer field trials at the University of Idaho Cooperative Extension Station, Idaho Falls, Id. under the direction of Dr. P. Nolte and W. Jones. Potato seedpieces were inoculated with talc-actinomycete mixtures AM-6 and AM-3. In this trial, 175 seedpieces were coated with 3 kg talc-actinomycete mixture at 4.4×10 6  spores/g carrier. 
     Thirty-five seedpieces/plot of G2 Russet Burbank from the University of Idaho Tetonia R &amp; E Center were planted on May 9, 1996. The plot consisted of 35 foot rows with five replications in a randomized complete block design. Fusarium sambucinum Isolate FID-212 (North Dakota State Univ.) was inoculated (8 ml water suspension at 1×10 6  CFU/ml per 180 seedpieces) in all treatments except the untreated uninoculated control, to evaluate Fusarium seed piece decay. Nitrogen fertilizer (N=150 lbs.) was applied to the test plot. Also, 4 pt. Eptam+0.25 lb. Sencor as a tank mix was applied post-emergence as a herbicidal treatment. Potatoes were irrigated throughout the growing season. 
     Stand evaluations (number of plants emerged) were performed on Jun. 25, 1996. Early-season performance evaluations were taken on Jul. 28, 1996. These evaluations consisted of vigor determinations (based on a 0-4 scale), number stems/tuber, rhizoctonia incidence (percent stems with Rhizoctonia lesions), and seed piece decay (estimated percent decay/seedpiece). The early season performance ratings were based on destructive sampling of 10 seedpieces from each plot (for a total of 10 seedpieces/plot, 50 seedpieces/treatment). Yield and grade data were collected on the remaining 25 seedpieces/plot at the time of harvest. At this time, decay (estimated percent decay/seedpiece) and rot (log 10 (decay+1)) were measured. Treatment means were separated by LSD (p=0.05) following statistical analysis by ANOVA. 
     Potatoes treated with mixture AM-3 consistently rated high in the response measurements including stand, vigor (table 9), and yield. Stand and yield measurements were not statistically different from other response variables at the p=0.05 level. Potatoes inoculated with AM-6 and AM-3 mixtures rated second and fourth lowest on per cent of stem Rhizoctonia disease (data not shown) but they were not statistically significant (p=0.05 level) from the other treatments. Potatoes inoculated with AM-3 also had one of the lowest ratings on the rot index (table 9) and elicited the lowest measurement on number of culls, but again the data was not statistically significant at the p=0.05 level. The stem index rating should fall within 3-4 (P. Nolte, personal communication) which corresponds to an optimal grade of tuber at harvest. Potatoes with AM-3 treatment fall well within this range (data not shown). 
     
                       TABLE 9______________________________________     Statistical     values Mean      Treatment______________________________________.sup.1 VigorDescription statisticsAlpha       0.05     .sup.2 3.66 a .sup.                          AM-3df          578      3.56 ab   .sup.3 MancozebMSE         0.426     3.50 abc .sup.4 MaximCritical Value of T       1.96     3.34      Untreat. uninoculatedLSD         0.260     3.32 bcd AM-6Harmonic Mean       49.0      3.32 bcd .sup.5 Captan                 3.32 bcd Carrier control                 3.32 bcd .sup.6 Single drop                3.26 dc   .sup.7 Untreat. Inoc.                3.22 d    .sup.8 TBZ.sup.9 Rot DescriptivestatisticsAlpha       0.05     0.709 a   TBZdf          576      0.703 a   Carrier controlMSE         0.319    0.675 a   Untreat. Inoc.Critical value of T       1.96      0.513 ab Untreat. Uninoc.LSD         0.225     0.488 ab AM-6Harmonic mean       48.82    0.449 b   Captan                0.436 b   AM-3                0.352 b   Single drop                0.082 c   Mancozeb                0.055 c   Maxim______________________________________ .sup.1 Potato vigor based on a 0-4 scale; 0 = not emerged, 4 = excellent. .sup.2 Means with the same letter are not statistically significant. .sup.3,4,5,8 Standard potato chemical fungicide treatments. .sup.5 Single drop potatoes are uncut seed potatoes. .sup.7 Untreated, inoculated is the control inoculated with pathogen, but not treated with carrier or any other chemical or biological amendments. All other treatments were inoculated with the pathogen except for the untreated, uninoculated control. .sup.9 Rot calculated as log10(decay + 1) whereas decay = estimated percent decay/seedpiece. 
    
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Onion Field Trials 
     0.268 acres of Walla Walla sweet seed onions were treated with mixture AM-6 as a furrow spray application at the time of planting, Sep. 16, 1996, near Walla Walla, Wash. The spore-zeolite stock inoculum was passed through 170 mesh screen prior to application to ensure the spray nozzles would not clog during application. The inoculum was added to powdered milk as a solubilizable carrier (114 g inoculum+250 g powdered dry milk). The formulation was suspended in 15 gallons of water and applied to the onions as they were sown. The spray was applied to three blocks, each block consisting of 180 linear feet (eight double-seeded rows) for a total of 34,560 onions. Approximately 6×10 5  CFU were placed in the furrow/seed. The experimental design consisted of three blocks of three (8 double row by 60 foot) onion replications. Powdered milk-sieved zeolite carrier constituted the control rows. 
     Emergence counts were taken on 2 months post-planting. All seedlings were counted in two of the eight double seeded rows within each 60 foot row. Treatment means were separated and analyzed statistically. 
     Emergence was enhanced significantly in response to actinomycete drench inoculum. The mean emergence of the actinomycete-inoculated onion sets/row was 125 as compared to 112 for the blank control rows. This relates to 67,400 onions/acre vs. 60,000/acre in the control. The field plot has had significant pink root, white rot, and smut problems in the past. A combination of these factors could account for the lower emergence incidence in the control plots. 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     Decrease in Fusarium Disease on Western Larch Large-Scale Greenhouse Trial 
     Four actinomycete mixtures and a carrier only control were inoculated into a soil-less peat/vermiculite potting mix used for container-grown Western Larch seedlings. The actinomycete mixtures consisted of AM-3, AM-4, a mixture identified as Con-5 in the tables, (Con-5 contains strains 333, 588, 611, 642, and 737), and a mixture identified in the tables as Con-3 (Con-3 contains strains 333, 619, and 643). The actinomycete spores were inoculated to a final concentration of 1×10 6  CFU/g potting mix. The Western larch seeds were challenged with two species of pathogen spores at three concentrations. Fusarium oxysporum 9051C spores were produced as referred to previously at 1×10 6 , 1×10 5 , and 1×10 4  CFU/g potting mix. Fusarium proliferatum 9202F spores were inoculated into the potting mix in an identical manner. 6,400 seedlings were monitored for emergence, damping-off, actinomycete and Fusarium root colonization, and disease symptoms throughout the growing season. 
     Table 10 summarizes the results of this large scale greenhouse trial. 
     
                       TABLE 10______________________________________.sup.1 Means of       .sup.2 Means ofWestern Larch       Western Larch                    .sup.3 Actinomycete numbers indisease rating       root/shoot ratios                    peat/vermiculite______________________________________.sup.4 Carrier control 1.57 a       AM-3         AM-3 a       3.05 aCon-5       Con-5        Con-5 a1.16 b      2.97 abAM-3        Con-3        AM-4 b1.06 bc     2.75 bcCon-3       AM-4         Con-3 c0.99 bc     2.74 bcAM-4        Carrier control                    Carrier control d0.75 c      2.54 cd______________________________________ .sup.1 Disease rating based on a 1-5 scale, 1 = no disease symptoms, 5 = dead seedling. .sup.2 Mass of dry root/mass of dry stem. .sup.3 Means separation based on ranked data. .sup.4 Means with the same lower case letter are not statistically significant 
    
     Disease symptoms elicited by the conifer pathogen Fusarium oxysporum 9051C decreased by up to 52% on the actinomycete inoculated seedlings. The higher root/shoot ratios also indicate that the actinomycete inoculated seedlings were more vigorous as a result of healthier root systems. Actinomycete numbers remained high on roots (data not shown) and in the soil-less potting mix after 6-7 months post-inoculation. 
     Whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been described hereinabove, for purposes of illustration, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details may be made without departing from the invention as defined in the appended claims. 
     The present invention is not limited to the descriptions of specific embodiments presented hereinabove, but rather the present invention should be viewed in terms of the claims that follow and equivalents thereof. Further, while the invention has been described in conjunction with several such specific embodiments, it is to be understood that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing detailed descriptions. Accordingly, this invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations which fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. 
     REFERENCES 
     James, R. L., R. K. Dumroese, C. J. Gilligan, and D. L. Wenny. 1989. Pathogenicity of Fusarium isolates from Douglas-fir seed and container-grown seedlings. Bulletin No. 52. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow, Id. 
     Nash, S. M. and W. C. Synder. 1962. Quantitative estimations by plate counts of propagules of the bean root rot Fusarium in field soils. Phytopathology. 52:567-572.