Abstract:
A test kit detects presence of ethanol alcohol in human breast milk. The test kit includes an alcohol oxidase reactive in the presence of ethanol alcohol in breast milk and oxygen, an indicator having a visible color when not subjected to oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount for visible observance, and a peroxidase reactive in the presence of acetaldehyde and peroxide, to yield oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount to induce change to the visible color of the hydrogen donor indicator. The test kit is a sealed pack containing a test strip. The test strip is for one-time use, and disposable after testing. The test strip is handled by a tester, typically a breast-feeding mother. The mother contacts her breast milk lactate with testing portion of the test strip. The testing portion selectively reacts to alcohol, and not other components of breast milk. A reactive agent of the testing portion of the test strip changes color in the presence of alcohol. The mother observes the result to determine if there is presence of alcohol in the breast milk.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     The present invention generally relates to ethanol screen testing and, more particularly, relates to screening for ethanol in breast milk of lactating females prior to breastfeeding.  
         [0002]     Various dangers of excessive ethanol alcohol consumption by humans, typically in the form of alcoholic beverages, are known and publicized. Research and reporting continues. The predominant focus of research and reporting has typically been the effects of such consumption on the particular consumer. Of course, health concerns, legal requirements and restraints, and other similar issues have often been raised, particularly in heavy alcohol consumers.  
         [0003]     Research of alcohol consumption by mothers during pregnancy, and impact to the in utero infant, has received much attention. Less attention has tended to be directed, however, to post-partum consumption of alcohol by breast-feeding mothers. In recent years, studies of breast milk composition and nutritional values of breast-feeding, post-birth maternal alcohol use and effects on lactation and hormones involved in breast-feeding, and infant developmental and other effects of breast-feeding have been documented.  
         [0004]     Presently, it is widely held that human milk is uniquely superior to alternatives for infant feeding, and breast-feeding generally appears quite beneficial for both the mother and the infant.  Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk , American Academy of Pediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeeding (1997). Of course, breast-feeding presents concerns for the mother, in that dietary, intake, drug, and other effects can be passed through to the feeding infant. This can constrain breast-feeding mothers from normal social lifestyles and require various dietary and activity constraints or practices. It also can cause consternation and worry to the mother. One major concern of breast-feeding mothers is whether or not alcohol consumption by the mother can adversely or otherwise affect the infant.  
         [0005]     Folklore and traditional wisdom (prior to at least as recent as about 1998, and even continuing to an extent thereafter until very recently) has been that some alcohol consumption, particularly of beer and wine, by breast-feeding mothers may be beneficial for increased lactate production, initiation of breastfeeding, infant nutrition, and other enhancement of breastfeeding success.  Alcohol&#39;s Effect on Lactation , Alcohol Res. Health, 25(3):230-4 (Mennella, et al., 2001);  Beer and Breastfeeding , Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 478:23-8 (Koletko, et al., 2000);  Breastfeeding  &amp;  Drugs: Alcohol , http://www.breastfeedingbasics.org/cgi-bin/deliver.cgi/content/Drugs/alcohol.html (O&#39;Connor, 1998)(moderate alcohol use on infant development is inconclusive; occasional alcoholic drink by lactating woman probably fine);  Alcohol and breastfeeding , J. Hum Lact., 11(4); 321-323 (Anderson, 1995)(alcohol believed to stimulate breast milk production; may stimulate sucking initially);  Infants&#39; suckling responses to the flavor of alcohol in mothers&#39; milk , Dev. Psychobiol., 26(8):459-66 (Mennella, 1993);  Transfer of alcohol to human milk , New Eng. J. Med., 325(14):981-985 (Mennella, et al., 1991)(limited amount of alcohol believed transferred to mothers&#39; milk);  Beer, breastfeeding, and folklore , N. Engl. J. Med, 321(7):425-30 (Menella, et al., 1989).  
         [0006]     Studies now show that alcohol presence in mothers&#39; milk may, in fact, have significant effects on breast-feeding and breast-fed infants. For example, infants may nurse more frequently but consume significantly less breast milk if it contains alcohol [ Beer, breastfeeding, and folklore , N. Engl. J. Med., 321(7):425-30 (Menella, et al., 1989)]; infant motor development may be adversely affected if exposed to breast milk alcohol [ Alcohol, Breastfeeding, and Development at  18  Months , Pediatrics 2002; 209; 72 (Little, et al., 2002);  Maternal alcohol use during breast - feeding and infant mental and motor development at one year , N. Engl. J. Med., 322(5):338-9 (Little, et al., 1990)]; lactate production by drinking mothers is not increased, and may decrease [ Lactation and alcohol: clinical and nutritional effects , Arch. Latinoam Nutr., 54(1):25-35 (de Araujo Burgos, et al., 2004);  Alcohol&#39;s Effect on Lactation , Alcohol Res. Health, 25(3):230-4 (Mennella, 2001)]; infant sleep patterns may change with intake of breast milk containing alcohol [ Sleep disturbances after acute exposure to alcohol in mothers&#39; milk , Alcohol, 25(3):153-8 (Mennella, et al., 2001);  Effects of Exposure to Alcohol in Mother&#39;s Milk on Infant Sleep , Pediatrics, 101(5):e2 (Menella, et al., 1998)]; and other problems to the infant and/or the mother.  
         [0007]     In light of these new indications (observed primarily only since after about of 1989 and more so in even more recent years in the 21 st  century) of potential harms of alcohol in breast-feeding, it appears advantageous to avoid breast-feeding if alcohol is present in breast milk. Authorities indicate that time studies on time to zero level of alcohol in breast milk are dependent on a number of factors, particularly including the amount of alcohol consumed by and the body weight of the mother.  Alcohol and Breast Feeding: Calculation of Time to Zero Level in Milk , Biol. Neonate, 80:219-22 (Ho, et al., 2001)(nomogram of weight and number of drinks to estimated time to zero from this source is provided in Appendix A). These same authorities recommend that the breast-feeding mother try to delay breast feeding to allow complete elimination of alcohol from her breast milk. Id. Notwithstanding the time to zero estimates presently available (as in the foregoing source), that source recognizes that the values may be faster or slower in some women, depend on many factors beyond weight and amount of alcohol consumed, and can only be estimated based on average results in the studies.  
         [0008]     For at least 20 years or so (i.e., since as early as about 1985), various tests and test kits for individual use have been proposed for testing alcohol levels in saliva and urine. More accurate measures of alcohol concentrations in the body after consuming ethanol alcohol beverages, however, generally require clinical diagnostic blood tests. The tests and test kits for individual use have been limited to determination of bodily alcohol levels to avoid illegal driving and the like. There have not been any individual-use alcohol tests or test kits for purposes of gauging for breastfeeding. Of course, breast milk levels of alcohol may not be well reflected from saliva, urine, and/or blood tests, as breast milk is produced through bodily processes of the mother that can significantly differ from the bodily processes for saliva, urine, and blood.  
         [0009]     It would therefore be advantageous to provide individual-use tests and test kits for directly detecting alcohol presence in breast milk. Moreover, levels of alcohol contained in breast milk may/may not be important to the ramifications of breast-feeding. Therefore, it would be advantageous to provide such tests and test kits that detect alcohol presence alone. Of course, compositional levels of alcohol in breast milk could also be considered important for the determinations, in certain instances. So, such tests and test kits could additionally/alternatively beneficially provide for alcohol level determinations in the milk. Objectives of individual-use tests and test kits in these regards could provide substantial health and other benefits.  
         [0010]     It would, therefore, be a significant improvement in the art and technology to provide tests and test kits for detection of alcohol in breast milk of breast-feeding mothers. The present invention provides numerous advantages and improvements, including improvements and nuances in the foregoing respects.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0011]     An embodiment of the invention is a test reagent for detecting alcohol. The test reagent includes alcohol oxidase reactive in the presence of alcohol in breast milk and oxygen, to yield acetaldehyde and peroxide, hydrogen donor indicator having a visible color when not subjected to oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount for visible observance, and peroxidase reactive in the presence of acetaldehyde and peroxide, to yield oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount to induce change to the visible color of the hydrogen donor indicator.  
         [0012]     Another embodiment of the invention is a method of testing breast milk lactate for presence of alcohol. The method includes obtaining the lactate, contacting a reactive agent with the lactate, the reactive agent being selective to alcohol versus components for breast milk not including alcohol, and observing a result of the step of contacting.  
         [0013]     Yet another embodiment of the invention is a method of testing of human breast milk for presence of ethanol alcohol. The method includes lactating to obtain a breast milk lactate sample, contacting a reactive agent with the sample, the reactive agent being selective to alcohol versus components for human breast milk not including alcohol, and observing a result of the step of contacting.  
         [0014]     Another embodiment of the invention is a test kit for detecting presence of alcohol in human breast milk. The test kit includes a substrate test strip, an alcohol detector of the strip, and a visible agent for changing color in the presence of alcohol on the alcohol detector.  
         [0015]     Yet another embodiment of the invention is a test kit for detecting presence of ethanol alcohol in human breast milk. The test kit includes alcohol oxidase reactive in the presence of ethanol alcohol in breast milk and oxygen, indicator having a visible color when not subjected to oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount for visible observance, and peroxidase reactive in the presence of acetaldehyde and peroxide, to yield oxidizing agent, in sufficient amount to induce change to the visible color of the hydrogen donor indicator.  
         [0016]     Another embodiment of the invention is a method of testing human breast milk for presence of ethanol alcohol. The method includes providing a sealed pack containing a test strip, the test strip having a reactive component and a handling component, opening the sealed pack, handling the test strip via the handling component, lactating, contacting the breast milk with the reactive component of the test strip, and observing a result from the step of contacting. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0017]     The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the accompanying figures, in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which:  
         [0018]      FIG. 1  illustrates a perspective view of a test strip for detecting presence of alcohol in breast milk of a breast-feeding mother, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0019]      FIG. 2  illustrates a side view of the test strip of  FIG. 1 , including a carrier strip and a reactive agent on the carrier strip, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0020]      FIG. 3  illustrates a side view of an alternate test strip, similar to that of  FIG. 1  but having a pool drop of reactive agent on an end of the carrier strip, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0021]      FIG. 4  illustrates a side view of another test strip, including reactive agent affixed to an end of the carrier strip, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0022]      FIG. 5  illustrates a side view of another alternate test strip, including a carrier strip that is impregnable or otherwise carries interstitially therewith a reactive agent, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0023]      FIG. 6  illustrates a side of yet another test strip, the test strip including a carrier vehicle at an end of the strip, the carrier vehicle serving to absorb or hold a reactive agent, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0024]      FIG. 7  illustrates a perspective view of a test kit, including the test strip of  FIG. 1 , the test kit having a sealed enclosure pack containing the test strip and a desiccant, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0025]      FIG. 8  illustrates a front view of an alternate test kit, having a sealed enclosure containing a reactive agent of a carrier strip, with a handling portion of the carrier strip protruding from within the sealed enclosure, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0026]      FIG. 9  illustrates a perspective view of a bottle test kit, including a vial and cap, the cap having a test piece extending therethrough with a reactive agent of the test piece contained within the vial and cap enclosure, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0027]      FIG. 10  illustrates a perspective view of another bottle test kit, a vial and cap enclosure containing a reactive agent, a separate handling strip is provided and includes or is formed of a material to carry the reactive agent when dipped into the vial into the agent, according to certain embodiments of the invention;  
         [0028]      FIG. 11  illustrates a side perspective view of another alternative test kit, including an enclosed packet of reactive agent, the enclosed packet being semi-permeable to permit soaking of the reactive agent contents with breast milk applied thereto, and providing for externally visible observance of test results with the reactive agent, according to certain embodiments of the invention; and  
         [0029]      FIG. 12  illustrates a method for testing a breast milk lactate for presence of alcohol, using a test strip, according to certain embodiments of the invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0030]     Referring to  FIG. 1 , a test strip  100  comprises a reactive agent  102  maintained on a carrier strip  104 . The carrier strip  104  has a handling portion  104   a  and a sampling portion  104   b . The handling portion  104   a  of the carrier strip  104  is for human handling of the test strip  100  via that portion. The indicator agent  102  is connected on, impregnated in, or otherwise maintained at the sampling portion  104   b  of the carrier strip  104 .  
         [0031]     The carrier strip  104  is a paper, plastic, wood, or similar material. The carrier strip  104  is suitable for maintaining the indicator agent  102  of the test strip  100  and also for non-interference and non-reaction in testing operations utilizing the test strip  100  as later described herein. The test strip  100  can be slim and linear, as in  FIG. 1 , or can have other shape that generally provides a portion for handling by a human user and another portion for location of an agent for testing. For example, a stick or round pole structure, a triangular or square slip, or other dimensioned piece can be suitable. In many (but not necessarily all) instances, the agent&#39;s properties for testing can be affected or otherwise disturbed if allowed to touch skin, become exposed to anything other than liquids in testing, such as, for example, exposure to air, gases, water, sweat, oils, emulsions, non-test liquids, and/or be subjected to certain temperature, pressure or other extremes; therefore, human handling is usually best limited to the handling portion  104   a  of the carrier strip  104 .  
         [0032]     The reactive agent  102  is an ethanol alcohol recognition composition or material. For example, the reactive agent  102  is reactive with ethanol alcohol if and when the reactive agent  102  is exposed to the alcohol in testing operations. Any of a variety of compounds or materials can be suitable as the reactive agent  102 . The reactive agent  102  is itself adhereable, impregnable, wickable, stainable, or otherwise connectable in, with or to the carrier strip  104  at the sampling portion  104   b . Alternately, a glue, attacher, or sticky matter is employed to retain the reactive agent  102  with the carrier strip  104  at the sampling portion  104   b , provided, such matter must not affect or alter reactivity of or tests with the reactive agent  102  and must not be itself be reactive inconsistent with the reactive agent  102 .  
         [0033]     Referring to  FIG. 2 , the test strip  100  of  FIG. 1  includes the carrier strip  104 . The reactive agent  102  is maintained on a surface of the carrier strip  104 . The reactive agent  102  is generally layered and attached to the carrier strip  104  at the sampling portion  104   b.    
         [0034]     Referring to  FIG. 3 , an alternate test strip  300 , includes the carrier strip  104 , or similar support, to that of the test strip  100  of  FIG. 1 . An alternate reactive agent  302  is a drop of matter reactive to ethanol alcohol. The reactive agent  302  is similarly disposed at the sampling portion  104   b  of the carrier strip  104 . The reactive agent  302  can be hardened material, affixed in, with or to the carrier strip  104 , or otherwise thereon disposed, including in liquid, gel or other physical form.  
         [0035]     Referring to  FIG. 4 , another alternate test strip  400  also includes the carrier strip  104  or similar support. The carrier strip  104  has reactive agent  402  located on at least two sides of the carrier strip  104  at the sampling portion  104   b . The sampling portion  104   b  is formed with the reactive agent  402 , for example, by dipping the sampling portion  104   b  into the reactive agent  402 , such as in manufacture where the reactive agent  402  is of a liquid form that hardens and attaches after dipping. Alternately, a cap-type form of reactive agent  402  can be attached to the sampling portion  104   b  at the end thereof. In  FIG. 4 , the reactive agent  402  is illustrated as formed on three sides at the sampling portion  104   b  (i.e., on a top side, a bottom side and an end); however, edges can also include the reactive agent  402 , the reactive agent  402  can be disposed only on the top side and bottom side, or otherwise.  
         [0036]     Referring to  FIG. 5 , another test strip  500  includes a carrier strip  504  that is a permeable, semi-permeable, wicking, blotting, or similar material. The reactive agent  502  is contained within interstices of the material of the carrier strip  504  at the sampling portion  504   b . The reactive agent  502  is liquid, dried liquid, powder, or hardened matter that is soaked up at least in part by the material of the carrier strip  504 , for example, during manufacture, just prior to test initiation, or otherwise as may be applicable for the particular agent employed for testing.  
         [0037]     Referring to  FIG. 6 , another alternate test strip  600  includes the carrier strip  104 , such as that of  FIG. 1 , and the carrier strip has an end carrier vehicle  602 . The carrier vehicle  602  is a cotton, sponge, or similar material that can retain therein or thereon a reactive agent  604 . The carrier vehicle  602  is formed, placed or joined to the carrier strip  104  at the sampling portion  602   b . The reactive agent  604  is maintained by the carrier vehicle  602  with the test strip  600 , for testing via the reactive agent  604  in the carrier vehicle  602 .  
         [0038]     Referring to  FIG. 7 , a test kit  700  includes a package  702 . The package  702  is a sealed, tearable enclosure, sufficient for containing a test kit strip  704  (substantially of the form of the test strips previously described, including a carrier strip and reactive agent). The package  702  is, for example, an environmentally sealed envelope, such as a metallic, plastic, paper or otherwise impermeable or semi-permeable material. The package  702  can be vacuum sealed or otherwise enclosed within a sterile (or, in certain instances, at least clean and generally clear lab or manufacturing facility) environment, wherein the test kit strip  704  is included prior to complete enclosure. The package  702  can, but need not necessarily, include tear dimples or other similar packaging aspects that enable ease of tearing or cutting to remove the test kit strip  704 . In every event, the test kit strip  704  is protected by the package  702 , once enclosed therein, from external matter that could contaminate, complicate, or otherwise affect testing via the test kit strip  704 . The package  702  can further include other elements within the package  702 , as desired, for example, desiccant  706 , other matters to aid preservation or veracity, testing instructions, contents descriptions, regulatory or other warnings and notices, and other matters.  
         [0039]     In use, the package  702  is opened, the test kit strip  704  is retrieved therefrom, and testing via the test kit strip  704  can be conducted.  
         [0040]     Referring to  FIG. 8 , an alternate test kit  800  includes an alternate package  802  and the test kit strip  704 . A sampling portion  104   b  (substantially as described with respect to the other Figures) of the test kit strip  704  is enclosed within the package  802 , and the handling portion  104   a  thereof protrudes through the enclosure of the package  802 . For example, the package  802  is shrink-wrapped or formed around the sampling portion  104   b , in a manner permitting the handling portion  104   a  (or part thereof) to extend outside the package  802 . In the package  802 , the enclosure is at least fairly completely sealed against or formed to or with the handling portion  104   a , to prevent contamination or other testing concerns to reagent for testing of the sampling portion  104   b . The package  802  can be folded back to expose the sampling portion  104   b  when testing is desired, or, as applicable, may be removed from the test kit strip  704 .  
         [0041]     Referring to  FIG. 9 , another alternate test kit  900  includes a vial  902 . The vial  902  is sealed by a cap  906 , such as a screw-on/off top or other sealing cap. A vial test strip  904  of the kit  900  includes a handling portion  904   a  and a sampling portion  904   b . The test strip  904  is formed to extend through the cap  906  with minimal clearance sufficient to prevent exposure of contents of the vial  902  when the cap  906  is in place to seal the enclosure. Alternately, the test strip  904  is integral to the cap  906 , and is either formed therewith, as part thereof, or is secured therewith extending through the cap  906 . The handling portion  904   a  extends from the cap  906  outside the enclosure of the vial  902  and cap  906 . Internally in that enclosure, the sampling portion  904   b  is disposed, extending from the cap  906  into the vial  902  (and, if and to the extent applicable, some length of extension of the handling portion  904   a  as may be necessary to cause the sampling portion  904   b  to sit in desired location within the vial  902 ). The vial  902  and cap  906  are each any of a glass, plastic, metal or similar rigid material sufficient to protect, and not react with, reagent of the sampling portion  904   b.    
         [0042]     In certain embodiments, a test reagent  908  (shown in phantom) can fill the vial  902 , if either there is not reagent fixed at the sampling portion  904   b  (such as is the reactive agent  102 , or similar, as previously discussed) or if the sampling portion  904   b  is capable of sitting/storing in a powder, liquid, or similar matter as the reagent material and collecting/retaining a sufficient portion of that reagent material when the sampling portion  904   b  is removed from the vial  902  for testing.  
         [0043]     In use, the cap  906  is removed from the vial  902 , and the sampling portion  904   b  with disposed reagent  908  (or, as applicable, reactive agent  102 , etc.) is removed from in the vial  902 . The user handles the handling portion  904   a  to remove the sampling portion  904   b  and conduct testing.  
         [0044]     Referring to  FIG. 10 , another test kit  1000  includes a vial  1002  and cap  1006  to enclose a reagent  1008 , for example, a liquid, powder, crystalline or other form. A test strip  1004  is external to the vial  1002  and cap  1006  enclosure, when testing is not performed. The test strip  1004  is that of the prior discussion and/or another design which allows capture of some of the reagent  1008  whenever the test strip  1004  is dipped into the reagent  1008  in the vial  1002 . For example, the test strip  1004  can wick the reagent  1008  at an end or can attach or affix to reagent  1008  at an end of the strip  1004 , for example, by glue, adherent, or similar means.  
         [0045]     In use, the cap  1006  is removed from the vial  1002 . The test strip  1004  is handled at an end opposite the intended testing end. The testing end of the test strip  1004  is then dipped into the open vial  1002  and into the reagent  1008 . The test strip  1004  is removed from the vial  1002 , with the reagent  1008  intact thereon at the testing end of the strip  1004 . Testing can then proceed.  
         [0046]     Referring to  FIG. 11 , another alternative test kit  1100  is an enclosed pouch  1102  with an internal space  1104  for storing a liquid, powder or similar content reagent  1108 . The test kit  1100  need not, but can, include a test strip (similar to those previously described). In use, the pouch  1102  is opened, for example, by tearing or cutting, to allow the content reagent  1108  to be removed from the pouch  1102 . The content reagent  1108  is then applied to a test sample. The content reagent  1108 , for example, can be poured onto a surface or otherwise directly located on a sample for testing.  
         [0047]     Alternately, the pouch  1102  can be semi-permeable to a sample for testing. In such alternative, the pouch  1102  can, itself, be placed into the sample for testing and/or the sample can be directed onto the pouch  1102 . The pouch  1102  in such instance will necessarily either itself provide test readings or will allow viewing of readings shown by the contents.  
         [0000]     Test Reagent  
         [0048]     In accordance with the foregoing, the particular test reagent is any of a wide variety of alternatives that detect the presence of ethanol alcohol in a breast milk sample. Of course, the results of testing of the breast milk sample for alcohol must not be detrimentally affected by the composition of the breast milk sample, at least not affected to the extent required for the reagent to yield appropriate alcohol test results. At least certain particular test reagents for such breast milk testing for alcohol may be known.  
         [0049]     A particular composition of the test reagent for the foregoing test strips and test kits is an alcohol oxidase enzyme extracted from yeast, together with a peroxidase and a hydrogen donor indicator, to provide an alcohol oxidase/peroxidase reaction. This composition reacts with ethyl alcohol if present in breast milk sample, to provide a resultant change of color in the reagent. The reaction is as follows:  
                         
 
         [0050]     Reagent Composition:  
                                                           Tetramethylbenzidine   0.176   mg           Alcohol Oxidase (EC 1.1.3.13)   0.5   IU           Peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7)   30   IU           Buffer   0.757   mg           Stabilizing Proteins   0.190   mg                      
 
 In the test reaction, the peroxidase functions as catalyst to induce a color change in the hydrogen donor and convert the hydrogen peroxide to water. 
 
         [0051]     Certain further examples of the alcohol oxidase of the reaction are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,430,427. Certain examples of the peroxidase of the reaction, as well as other possible peroxidatively active substances, are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,361,648. Of course, other suitable alcohol oxidase enzymes, peroxidases, and indicator agents can be employed, in keeping with the purposes herein. One manufacture of a test strip, including a reactive pad, similar to the test strip  100  of  FIG. 1 , is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,596. Of course, other compatible manufacture, in keeping with the purposes herein, can be employed.  
         [0000]     Testing Procedure  
         [0052]     Referring to  FIG. 12 , a method  1200  of testing for ethanol alcohol in breast milk utilizes the foregoing test strips and test kits of the present invention. The method  1200  commences with a step  1202  of opening a pack or enclosure containing the sampling portion of the test strip. As previously mentioned, the pack or enclosure protects integrity of the test strip/reagent for testing. On opening in the step  1202 , the test strip/reagent is then useable for testing.  
         [0053]     The test strip/sampling portion/reagent is removed from the pack or enclosure in a step  1204 . The testing person handles the test strip at the handling portion, to prevent affects on test integrity. In a step  1204 , the user continues handling the test strip by the handling portion during the testing method  1200 .  
         [0054]     A breast milk lactate from a breast-feeding mother is obtained in a step  1206 . The quantity of the breast milk lactate obtained in the step  1206  need not be great, but should be sufficient for suitably wetting the reagent of the alcohol test and for yielding a proper result of the test. The breast milk lactate is applied, in a step  1208 , preferably directly (but could also be indirectly, via a container of the breast milk or other specimen thereof), onto the reagent. For example, if using a test strip/test kit as herein described, the reagent pad at the sampling portion of the strip is wetted by breast milk sample.  
         [0055]     A waiting period in a step  1210  must then be allowed, in order for the reaction to occur or not. For example, in testing with the test reagent particularly described above, a period of at least about 2 minutes is recommended. In this wait period, the reaction of the reagent with any alcohol in the breast milk takes place, and also the indicator is triggered therein to yield a visible result.  
         [0056]     In a step  1212 , the visible result is viewed and compared to detect any change indicative of alcohol presence in the breast milk lactate. If there is not any such indicative change, then there is usually little or no alcohol (neither ethanol alcohol or certain other alcohols, for example, alcohols of less than 5 carbons using the test reagent particularly described above). On the other hand, if there is an indicative change, then usually there is some presence of alcohol (ethanol or other, for example, alcohol of less than 5 carbons using the test reagent) in the breast milk lactate.  
         [0057]     In alternatives, quantities of alcohol in breast milk can be estimated from the viewable results. For example, a more significant or pronounced indicative change can signal greater alcohol concentration in the breast milk; whereas, a less significant or less pronounced change can signal a lesser alcohol concentration of the milk. Data (for example, obtainable through other more exact and precise laboratory testing means than those described herein, as will be known to those skilled in the art) is corresponded with varied viewable results from different alcohol-breast milk concentrations employing the testing described herein, and can be compiled as average concentration readings, to provide charts, color tabs, or other comparative devices, for estimation of concentration levels based on the viewable results of the testing described herein.  
         [0058]     Various substances may interfere with the accuracies obtained via the testing and test strips/kits herein. Moreover, because it is expected that non-laboratory trained individuals may be performing the testing with the test strips/kits, subjective determinations by those individuals of results can be varied. In general, with the particular test reagent described herein, the following substances, for example, may affect integrity of test results: peroxidases, strong oxidizers, reducing agents (e.g., ascorbic acid, tannic acid, pyrogallol, mercaptans and tosylates), billirubin, L-dopa, L-methyldopa, metampyrone, and others. Further, other particular medications, diets, metabolism and other individualized characteristics of the breast-feeding mother can potentially affect results. Generally, however, for the purposes of most mothers, the testing, test strips, test kits and other features and aspects herein will generally provide a fair indication of alcohol in breast milk lactate, to allow those mothers to decide if there is any concern with feeding the breast milk so tested to infants.  
       EXAMPLES  
       [0059]     A test strip having a handling portion and a sampling portion, with a test reagent disposed on the sampling portion, was obtained, for example, from Chematics, Inc. P.O. Box 293, North Webster, Ind., USA 46555. A breast-feeding mother consumed a bloody mary and a glass of white wine at brunch during the period 11 am-1 pm. At about 4 pm that same day, a sample of breast milk lactate was taken from the mother&#39;s breast. The sample was disposed directly from the breast onto the reagent of the sampling portion. At least 2 minutes were waited for testing reactions to occur. The mother observed the test results, and the test results indicated no change in color of reagent. This indicated to the mother that there was no presence of ethanol alcohol (from the earlier consumption) in the breast milk at that time. The mother thereafter immediately again performed a second testing with a new, unused but identical test strip. The mother obtained a next sample of breast milk lactate from her breast. The sample was contacted with the reagent for a period of at least 2 minutes. The reagent of the second test strip did not change color, and the mother observed that the second test results also indicated lack of presence of ethanol alcohol in the breast milk at that time.  
         [0060]     The same mother, three days thereafter, consumed a beer and two and a half glasses of wine during the period between 7 pm-10:30 pm of that day. At 12:30 am the next morning, the mother remaining awake during the period from 10:30 pm to 12:30 am, conducted a next test of her breast milk lactate. In the test, an identical, but new and unused, test strip, like those used in the prior tests, was employed. The mother contacted breast milk then obtained by her with the reagent. After a wait period of at least 2 minutes, the mother observed some darkening change in color of the reagent of the test strip. The mother observed that the test result indicated a presence of ethanol alcohol in her breast milk at that time. The mother compared the resulting color of the reagent to a comparison tab provided with the packaging of the test strip, also obtained from Chematics, Inc. (a sample of the comparison tab is included in Appendix A hereto). Based on the mother&#39;s comparative observance, the mother estimated that her breast milk did contain some alcohol, and the mother estimated that alcohol concentration of the breast milk to be about 0.3% per the comparison tab. The mother then slept until about 6 am. At 6 am, the mother next tested her lactate then obtained, using another identical, but new and unused, test strip. The mother wetted the reagent of the test strip with the breast milk. After at least 2 minutes, the mother observed the reagent of the test strip and observed no change in color, indicating to the mother the lack of presence of alcohol in her breast milk at that time.  
         [0061]     The same mother, again, ten days thereafter, consumed alcoholic beverages. The mother did not account for the number or type of alcoholic drinks she consumed, however, the mother states she began drinking the beverages at about 7 pm that evening and continued casual drinking throughout the evening until about 1:30 am the next morning. The mother slept and woke to test at about 7 am. At 7 am, the mother obtained breast milk from her breast. The mother contacted the breast milk and the reagent of an identical, new and unused, test strip. The mother waited 2 minutes to observe the test results. The reagent color that was observed appeared dark, having changed color significantly. The mother observed that the test result indicated the presence of substantial alcohol in her breast milk at the time, on the order of about 0.3% or more. Later in the day, at about 10 am, the mother again conducted the same test in substantially the same manner. The result of the test continued to indicate presence of substantial alcohol in the mother&#39;s breast milk at that time. The mother&#39;s comparison to the comparison tab approximations indicated the breast milk contained on the order of about 0.3% alcohol. Thereafter, on the same day at about 2 pm, the mother again tested her breast milk in similar manner. The mother observed that the result of the test indicated lack of presence of alcohol in the mother&#39;s breast milk taken at that time, the reagent having not changed in color to give other/different indication.  
         [0062]     Another breast-feeding mother also tested her breast milk lactate for alcohol presence. One evening, this breast-feeding mother consumed 4 glasses of wine at dinner during the period 7:30 pm-9:30 pm. At about 10:30 pm that same night, this mother tested her breast milk lactate. The sample was disposed directly from the breast onto the reagent of the sampling portion. At least 2 minutes were waited for testing reactions to occur. The mother observed the test results, and the test results indicated the breast milk contained on the order of about 0.3% alcohol. At 5 am the next morning, the mother again tested her breast milk in similar manner. The testing strip indicated to the mother that there was no presence of ethanol alcohol (from the earlier consumption) in the breast milk at that time.  
         [0063]     The same mother, the next evening, consumed two and a half glasses of wine during the period between 8:30 pm-10:30 pm of that day. At 11 pm that same evening, the mother contacted breast milk then obtained by her with the reagent. The mother observed that the test resulted in a presence of ethanol alcohol in her breast milk contained on the order of about 0.3% alcohol. To show a comparison with the concentration of alcohol in her breast milk, at that same time, a saliva test was also done, indicating her blood alcohol level was 0.08%.  
         [0064]     To compare her results in a separate sequence of testing, one evening 3 weeks later, this breast-feeding mother consumed 2 martinis and 2 beers during the period 7 pm-10 pm. At about 12:00 am that same night, this mother pumped and tested her breast milk lactate. The sample was disposed directly from the breast onto the reagent of the sampling portion. At least 2 minutes were waited for testing reactions to occur. The mother observed the test results, and the test results indicated the breast milk contained on the order of about 0.08% alcohol. The next evening, the mother again consumed alcoholic beverages in the form of 4 beers during the period 5 pm-7 pm. Two hours later, at 9 pm, she then tested her breast milk in a similar manner as before. The testing strip indicated to the mother that there was a presence of ethanol alcohol (from the earlier consumption) in the breast milk at that time, indicating a level of 0.3%.  
         [0065]     Other alternatives are possible in keeping with the foregoing and all such alternatives are included herein. For example, different support or carriers can be employed for the test strip. Also, the particular active reagent for testing can be selected from among the various alternatives, in keeping with the purposes herein. Test strips and test kits can have a variety of forms/styles, depending on desired aspects. Comparison tabs or other color or indicator estimation measures can be derived and utilized. Additionally, the test strips, kits, and methods can be employed solely or primarily for purposes of detecting a presence of any alcohol in breast milk lactate, versus obtaining an estimated concentration. It is expected that with certain mothers, given wide variation in lifestyles, diets, metabolism, activities, and consumption, there are certain instances that may be more or less susceptible to obtaining accurate results of the breast milk-alcohol testing. Further, certain drugs, medications, and environments could impact test results, either adversely or beneficially. Variations in reagent compositions, as well as particular components of the compositions, can yield different results. Multiple testing via a varied assortment of such compositions could, for example, be conducted in each testing instance, in order to obtain more verifiable outcomes. Of course, as has been described herein with several examples and embodiments, more generalized concepts herein can be employed in testing for presence of alcohol in mothers&#39; breast milk under differing and other conditions.  
         [0066]     In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.  
         [0067]     Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims. As used herein, the terms “comprises”, “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.