Abstract:
A process for the reduction of the nitrate content of tobacco materials by microbial treatment is disclosed wherein tobacco materials are subjected, under controlled conditions, to the action of a microorganism effective to degrade nitrates through a biochemical reaction. Tobacco materials treated in accordance with this process, when incorporated into a tobacco smoking product, produce a mild smoke having reduced nitrogen oxides and hydrogen cyanide deliveries without loss of desirable flavor, taste or other smoking properties.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     (A) Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to a process for reducing the nitrate content of tobacco materials by treating the tobacco with cultures of microorganisms. More specifically, the invention relates to a process for treating tobacco materials to reduce the nitrate content thereof, which, when incorporated into a tobacco smoking product, yield smoke with reduced nitrogen oxides and hydrogen cyanide deliveries without loss of desirable flavor and taste properties or other smoking qualities. 
     (B) Prior Art 
     For various reasons, it is often desirable to reduce the nitrate content of tobacco. For example, in recent years, low delivery cigarettes have gained substantial consumer acceptance and numerous techniques have become available for reducing smoke deliveries. 
     In the removal or reduction of the nitrate content, the most common methods have included the use of chemical agents in selective nitrate and ion removal from tobacco extracts by ion retardation (U.S. Pat. No. 3,847,164) and ion exchange (U.S. Pat. No. 3,616,801) techniques. However, there is no treatment known which enables reduction of the nitrate content of tobacco which includes the use of microorganisms. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for reducing the nitrate content of tobacco. It is another object of this invention to provide a process for the preparation of an aqueous medium containing a microorganism which may be used for the degradation of the nitrate content of tobacco. Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the accompanying disclosure. 
     The present invention resides in the recognition that certain microorganisms in an aqueous solution, when coming in contact with tobacco, degrade the nitrate content of the tobacco. It has been found that tobacco material treated with a pure culture of specific microorganisms degrade nitrates in tobacco materials. In so doing, a tobacco material is produced that, when placed in a blended cigarette, contributes to decreasing deliveries of nitrogen oxides and hydrogen cyanide. A preferred culture includes Micrococcus denitrificans, (Paracoccus denitrificans Am. Type Culture Collection Accession No. 17741) as described in Bergeys Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Edited by R. E. Buchanan and N. E. Gibbons, pp. 438-439, 8th Edition. However, it is realized that other cultures may also be used, such as: Micrococcus halodenitrificans, Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Erwinia carotovora, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Thiobacillus denitrificans. Also, nitrate-containing compounds may also be used in combination with the microorganisms, such as, potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, and the like. 
     Using the culture of the present invention, it is practical to treat burley or flue-cured lamina or stem and remove the nitrates therein or to make a water extract of either material and remove the nitrates and then reapply the treated extract to the original tobacco materials. The capability of treating the extract and then reapplying it to the original tobacco avoids the solubles weight loss encountered when using water extraction and discard as a vehicle for removing nitrate. It also avoids the loss of other desirable tobacco components encountered in water extraction and discard. This process is also useable in reconstituted tobacco production systems wherein the tobacco is extracted and the extract is added back in subsequent process steps, since this enzyme (microbial) system functions efficiently in a liquid system. In the process, the nitrate is broken down and converted to gaseous nitrogen, which is released to the atmosphere. 
     It has been found that the nitrate-containing compound in the aqueous medium must be at least 0.1 percent by weight in the medium and preferably in the range of about 1 percent. Even though higher percentages of nitrate-containing compounds may be used, increasing the nitrate-containing compound in excess of 1 percent by weight does not appreciably assist in the degrading capabilities of the microorganisms. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     According to the present invention, one preferred method for reducing the nitrate content of tobacco is to prepare an aqueous medium containing microorganisms which will degrade nitrates. 
     In the preparation of an aqueous medium, a nutrient agar (first) solution is prepared by adding a commercially available nutrient agar to distilled water, the amount of agar generally being at least 5 grams per liter. In one proposed method, to this is added a nitrate-containing compound, preferably potassium nitrate, which is at least 0.1 percent by weight of nitrate per volume of water and is generally about 1 percent by weight of nitrate per volume of water. 
     This solution is then sterilized as tubed slants; that is, test tubes containing the nutrient agar solution are placed at a slant to provide a slanted surface in an autoclave for at least 15 minutes at at least 15 psig and at 121° C. The sterilized medium is then placed in a refrigerator for later use. 
     A second solution is prepared which includes a nitrate-containing substance therein which is to be treated by the culture grown in the first medium. One such second solution may be a nutrient broth containing nitrates therein which is prepared by dissolving a commercially available nutrient broth in distilled water, the amount of nutrient broth being from about 5 to 10 grams per liter. However, it is realized that those skilled in the art may vary the nutrient broth concentration and achieve a useable culture. This solution is also sterilized for at least 15 minutes at at least 15 psig and 121° C. or greater in an autoclave. Potassium nitrate or other nitrate-containing compounds may be added to this solution prior to the sterilization. 
     Another example of a second solution may be a tobacco extract broth containing nitrates. The tobacco extract broth is prepared by taking usually about 100 grams of tobacco material, such as, a flue-cured burley stem mixture and mixing this with about 1,000 milliliters of water and then cooking the mixture in an autoclave for about 30 to 60 minutes at at least 15 psig and 121° C. or greater. 
     The resultant liquid extract is then removed and the liquid volume is adjusted to the original amount of the extract by adding distilled water. The extract is then mixed with yeast extract, the yeast extract being generally at least 0.3 percent by weight to volume of liquid. However, greater amounts of yeast extract may be used if desired. The mixture is dispensed into flasks that are cotton-plugged and sterilized for at least 15 minutes at 15 psig or greater and 121° C. or greater for subsequent culture propagation. Prior to use for culture growth, the pH is adjusted with appropriate acid or base to about 7.2. The microorganism, preferably Micrococcus denitrificans, is incubated on the nutrient agar slants for from three to five days at 5° to 37° C. The resultant growth is then used to inoculate the pH adjusted tobacco extract broth, the inoculum being removed from the slants by washing the slant surface with a predetermined amount of distilled water. The inoculated tobacco extract broth is then subjected to agitation for generally about 24 hours at 5° to 37° C. to promote growth of the culture. 
     The resultant inoculum is then ready for use in the treatment of tobacco materials to reduce the nitrate content therein. 
     In the treatment of tobacco materials (solids), the pH of the tobacco is adjusted with a base and water mixture to about 7.0 to 7.2. The culture is then applied along with additional water and the tobacco so treated is usually placed in plastic bags where nitrate degradation occurs. 
    
    
     A more comprehensive understanding of the invention can be obtained by considering the following examples. However, it should be understood that the examples are not intended to be unduly limitative of the invention. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     The following example demonstrates the procedure that was followed in the preparation of inoculum. 
     (a) Nutrient agar+1.0% potassium nitrate. 
     Commercially prepared Nutrient Agar (dehydrated form) from Difco Laboratories was added to distilled water in the ratio of 23 grams per liter. The 23 grams of Nutrient Agar contained 3 grams of beef extract; 5 grams of peptone and 15 grams of agar. To this solution was added 1% of potassium nitrate by weight to volume of water. The resulting solution had a final pH of 6.8. 
     This medium was then sterilized as tubed slants in an autoclave for 15 minutes at 15 psig and 121° C., cooled, and refrigerated for later use to grow cultures. 
     (b) Nutrient Broth. 
     A solution of Nutrient Broth media was prepared by adding dehydrated Nutrient Broth from Difco Laboratories at a rate of 8 grams per liter to distilled water. The Nutrient Broth contained 5 grams of peptone and 3 grams of beef extract. The resulting aqueous medium was then sterilized for 15 minutes at 15 psig and 121° C. for later use in culture growth. 
     (c) Flue-Cured/Burley Stem Tobacco Extract Broth. 
     A flue-cured/burley stem tobacco extract broth was prepared by adding 100 grams of flue-cured/burley stem to 1,000 ml of water and cooking in an autoclave for 40 minutes at 15 psig and 121° C. The resultant liquor extract was removed and the liquid volume was adjusted to its original amount with distilled water. The liquor was then mixed with yeast extract (YE) at a rate of 0.5% by weight of yeast extract per volume of liquor and the mixture dispensed into flasks that were cotton-plugged and sterilized at 15 psig for 15 minutes at 121° C. for subsequent culture propagation. 
     (d) Broth Inoculation. 
     The microorganism, Micrococcus denitrificans (American Type Culture Collection Accession Number 17741), is incubated on the Nutrient Agar slants for from three to five days at 30° C. Liquid media, for example, Nutrient Broth or flue-cured/burley stem tobacco extract broth are inoculated at a 2% (v/v) rate with a sterile water wash of culture from slants. The pH of the broth prior to inoculation is adjusted with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide to about 7.2 to b 7.5. The flasks are then subjected to rotary agitation for approximately 24 hours at 30° C. and 160 rpm. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     This example demonstrates the nitrate degradation that occurs in flue-cured/burley stem extract and flue-cured stem extract. 
     Micrococcus denitrificans (Am. Type Culture Collection Accession Number 17741) was grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract (+0.5% YE) prepared as described in Example 1 and in flue-cured stem extract prepared as follows: 
     Fifteen pounds of flue-cured stem was extracted in 240 pounds of water at 90° C. for 30 minutes. The extract was centrifugally separated, collected and yeast extract added at a 0.5% (wt/v) rate. The mixture was sterilized for 15 minutes at 15 psig and 121° C. 
     Both media were inoculated, after pH adjustment, with washings from 4 day slants, at 10% (v/v) rate and incubated at 160 rpm (rotary) and 30° C. for 24 hours in Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml/500 ml flask). 
     Results are shown in the following table: 
     
         ______________________________________             Growth             Time              NO.sub.3Medium            (hrs)    pH       (μg/ml)______________________________________Flue-cured/Burley Stem              0       ˜7.50                               2,500Extract + 0.5% Yeast Extract             16       8.10     59             20       8.29     57             24       --       55Flue-cured Stem Extract + 0             ˜7.50                      7160.5% Yeast Extract             16       --       699             24       7.96     66______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen from the above data that the nitrate is substantially degraded in both extracts. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     This example demonstrates the effects of aeration on the culture mass during nitrate degradation using the microorganism Micrococcus denitrificans. 
     A culture of Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC 17741) was grown on Nutrient Agar+1% KNO 3  slants and then grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract broth+0.5% yeast extract in shake flasks as described in Example 1. 
     This culture was split into two equal parts and used as inoculum for two separate fermentors of the same broth+0.5% yeast extract. 
     Growth parameters for the culture in each fermentor were: 
     
         ______________________________________Parameters  Fermentor A    Fermentor B______________________________________Medium      Flue-cured/burley                      Flue-cured/burley       stem extract + stem extract +       0.5% YE        0.5% YEVolume (liters)        8              8Agitation (rpm)       300            300Aeration (cc/min.)       2,000          0 (none)Temp. (°C.)       30             30pH Set/Control         7.8            7.8Inoculum Rate        5              5(% v/v)(From Flasks)Control Acid (2N)       HCL            HCLControl Base (2N)       NaOH           NaOH______________________________________ 
    
     The results of growth under these conditions are shown below. 
     
         __________________________________________________________________________     Fermentor A   Fermentor BTime      (Aerated)     (Unaerated)of        Cells    NO.sub.3                   Cells    NO.sub.3Sample    (× 10.sup.6 /ml)           pH (μg/ml)                   (× 10.sup.6 /ml)                         pH (μg/ml)__________________________________________________________________________Before Inoc.*        0  6.78              2,630                      0  6.99                            2,900Inoculum  9,500 8.10              0    9,500 8.10                             00 hrs. after Inoc.       370 7.91              2,690                     90  7.84                            2,59016 hrs. after Inoc.     7100  7.82              560  4,500 7.85                            35017 hrs. after Inoc.     --    7.83              0    --    7.92                            3418 hrs. after Inoc.     8,600 7.82              0    3,700 7.95                            3419 hrs. after Inoc.     --    7.81              0    --    7.95                            3421 hrs. after Inoc.     10,400           7.81              0    3,400 7.97                            3322.5 hrs. after Inoc.     9,900 7.75              0    3,800 7.94                            33__________________________________________________________________________ *Inoculation 
    
     These cultures were then used to treat burley tobacco lamina with the following results: 
     
         ______________________________________       Aerated       Inoculum From       Fermentor A                 Unaerated Inoculum       Wet           From Fermentor B         Tobacco  NO.sub.3                         Wet Tobacco                                   NO.sub.3Treatment Time (hrs.)         pH       (%)    pH        (%)______________________________________Inoculated Tobacco.sup.(1) 0            7.11     3.27   7.52      3.4124            8.27     0.57   8.13      1.30Uninoculated Control.sup.(2) 0            7.17     3.14   7.20      2.8524            7.60     3.32   7.49      2.90______________________________________ .sup.(1) All treatments were: 90 gm dry weight burley lamina 20 ml 1N NaOH 116 ml H.sub.2 O 134 ml Inoculum 30° C. in plastic bags with restricted air availability .sup.(2) All controls were: 90 gm dry weight burley lamina 20 ml 1N NaOH 250 ml H.sub.2 O No Inoculum 30° C. in plastic bags with restricted air availability 
    
     It can be seen that the aerated culture produced the greatest cell mass and degraded the leaf tobacco nitrate best. However, the unaerated culture also produced a large amount of degradation of the leaf tobacco nitrate. Tobacco treated with cultures grown under either set of conditions is acceptable for use in tobacco products. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     This example demonstrates nitrate degradation of an inoculated tobacco. 
     Five pounds of burley tobacco were treated with an aerated culture of Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC 17741) grown for 22 hours as described in Example 3. The treated tobacco was bulked at 30° C. in a plastic bag using the following materials: 
     Inoculum (ml)--2880 
     Tobacco Weight (gm)--2270 
     1N NaOH (ml)--449.5 
     Tap Water (ml)--2572 
     The results of this treatment were: 
     
         ______________________________________            Wet TobaccoTreatment Time (hrs.)            pH         NO.sub.3 (%)______________________________________Inoculated Tobacco(2270 gm tob. wt.) 0               6.98       2.9518               7.44       1.8221               7.58       1.44Uninoculated Control(90 gm tob. wt.) 0               7.14       2.7821               7.24       3.21______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen that the nitrate content of the treated tobacco was reduced from 2.95% to 1.44% (a 51% reduction) while the nitrate content of the control sample did not decrease. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     This example demonstrates the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in smoke from a tobacco product when using a tobacco which has been subjected to nitrate degradation by the microorganism Micrococcus denitrificans. 
     Nine hundred eight grams of burley tobacco lamina was mixed with 2,864 ml of Micrococcus denitrificans grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract as described in Example 1. No additional water was added and no pH adjustment was made prior to inoculation. The tobacco was thoroughly mixed and placed into a plastic bag and incubated at 30° C. for 24 hours. 
     
         ______________________________________Treatment  Nitrate             MoistureTime (hrs.)      (%)          pH     (%)______________________________________ 0         2.13         7.25   ˜7518         1.57         --     --24         0.91         7.95   ˜75______________________________________ 
    
     In this tobacco treatment the liquid inoculum served three purposes: 
     (1) Initial tobacco pH adjustment (pH at ˜5.8 starting). 
     (2) Tobacco moisture elevation (target 75%). 
     (3) Supply culture to degrade nitrate. 
     After microbial treatment, the burley tobaccos were mixed with other standard blend components where the total blend nitrate content was 1.16% compared to 1.69% for the untreated control blend. 
     The separate blends were made into cigarettes and smoked on a constant vacuum smoking machine. The results were: 
     
         ______________________________________            Per Puff Deliveries        Blend     NOx     HCNSample       Nitrate (%)                  (μg) (μg)                                Puff No.______________________________________Untreated Control        1.69      40      13.5  7.2Treated      1.16      33      11.8  7.3______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen that the nitrogen oxides in smoke are significantly reduced (17.5%) in the sample containing the treated tobacco. Also, the hydrogen cyanide delivery is reduced (12.6%) in the sample containing treated tobacco. All other delivery components remained virtually unchanged. 
     EXAMPLE 6 
     This example demonstrates the reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) in a tobacco product when using a tobacco which has been subjected to nitrate degradation by the microorganism Micrococcus denitrificans. 
     Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 17741) was grown as described in Example 3 (Fermentor &#34;A&#34; conditions) and used to treat burley tobacco for 24 hours in closed plastic bags at 30° C. The nitrate in the growth medium was depleted at 17 hours. 
     The following amounts of materials were used: 
     Inoculum (ml)--1716 
     1N NaOH (ml)--270 
     Water (ml)--1555 
     Tobacco (gm)--1362 
     Tobacco treatment results were: 
     
         ______________________________________Treatment     Wet Tobacco  NO.sub.3                             MoistureTime (hrs)    pH           (%)    (%)______________________________________Inoculated Tobacco 0            7.21         2.51   75.721            7.70         1.33   73.924            --           1.33   --Air Dried     8.28         1.41   --______________________________________ 
    
     After treatment, the burley lamina was blended with other tobacco components and made into cigarettes and smoked on a constant vacuum smoking machine. A control product, without treated lamina, but incorporating untreated burley lamina, was also machine smoked. The results were: 
     
         ______________________________________          Per Puff Deliveries      Blend     NOx      HCNSample     Nitrate (%)                (μg)  (μg)                               Puff No.______________________________________Control    1.70      61       33    7.04Experimental      1.36      49       30    7.08______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen from the above data that nitrogen oxides were significantly reduced (19.7%) in the product containing the treated tobacco. Also, the hydrogen cyanide delivery was reduced (9.1%) in the product containing treated tobacco. 
     EXAMPLE 7 
     This example demonstrates the procedure of extracting tobacco lamina with water to remove nitrate, treating the extract with Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 17741) to remove the nitrate therefrom, then adding the modified extract back to the original tobacco. 
     A tobacco extract was prepared by mixing 100 gms of burley lamina with one liter of water and allowing it to stand at room conditions for two hours. At this point, the extract was collected by decanting the liquid and pressing the tobacco to remove additional liquid. The tobacco was spread to dry in room air while the extract (˜700 ml) was subjected to microbial treatment. 
     A mature culture of Micrococcus denitrificans was grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract medium, prepared as described in Example 1, and added to the tobacco extract, prepared as described in the previous paragraph, at a 10% (v/v) rate. Prior to culture addition, the extract pH was raised to 7.0±0.1. The culture was incubated in the extract in an Erlenmeyer flask on a rotary shaker at 30° C. The following chemical changes occurred across the 18 hour incubation time: 
     
         ______________________________________Micrococcus denitrificans Treatmentof Burley Lamina Extract                 NO.sub.3 (μg/ml)______________________________________Burley lamina extract 1872Mature Micrococcus denitrificans                 64cultureExtract after treatment (18 hrs)                 66______________________________________ 
    
     The data indicate that nitrate was almost completely degraded (˜96%) by the treatment. 
     After the 18 hours incubation, the treated extract was added back to the originally extracted tobacco in three stages because of the large volume of treated extract. This was done by adding a portion, mixing thoroughly and air drying, prior to the next addition. The following chemical changes resulted from this procedure: 
     
         ______________________________________Tobacco Analysis        NO.sub.3 (%)______________________________________Burley lamina before extraction                   1.96Burley lamina after extraction                   0.72Burley lamina after treated extract added                   0.44back______________________________________ 
    
     Data show that 77% of the nitrate was removed by the Micrococcus denitrificans treatment. 
     The tobaccos resulting from this operation were useable in manufacturing type operations. 
     In certain reconstituted tobacco manufacturing processes, the step of extracting the tobacco solubles is an integral part of the overall processing. If preferred, the resultant extracted tobacco could be processed by paper-making techniques into base sheet to which the extract, from which nitrate has been recovered by microbial treatment, could then be added back in the normal manner. 
     EXAMPLE 8 
     This example demonstrates some differences in the final product which can be obtained by using ultrafiltration equipment in conjunction with tobacco extraction, extract treatment and extract addback as described in Example 7. Tobacco used in this work was from the same source as that used in Example 7. 
     A burley lamina extract was prepared as in Example 7. The extract was then filtered with a 0.2 micron pore size filter in an Amicon ultrafiltration device (Model TCF10) prior to inoculating the filtered extract with Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 17741) and treating it as described in Example 7. Following treatment, the extract was again filtered (0.2 micron pore size filter) before addback procedures were started. The materials retained on the filter during the first filtration and the permeate from the second filtration were added back to the extracted tobacco. 
     The materials retained by the filter during the second filtration were not added back to the tobacco. The following chemical changes occurred in the extract: 
     
         ______________________________________Chemical Changes Across Ultrafiltration and Micrococcusdenitrificans Treatment of Burley Tobacco                NO.sub.3                (μg/ml)______________________________________Burley lamina extract  1872Mature Micrococcus denitrificans culture                   64Extract after filtration                  2028Extract after Micrococcus denitrificans                   646treatment______________________________________ 
    
     The following chemical changes were measured in the tobacco across extraction and treatment: 
     
         ______________________________________Tobacco AnalysisBurley Lamina        NO.sub.3 (%)______________________________________Before extraction    1.96After extraction     0.72After treated extract added back                0.85______________________________________ 
    
     These results show that nitrate is removed from the extract by Micrococcus denitrificans, but as opposed to Example 7, no further removal from the extracted tobacco occurs during addback procedures. In this example, the microbial cells do not contact the tobacco, whereas in Example 7, the cells do contact the tobacco during addback and produce further chemical changes. 
     The tobaccos resulting from this operation were useable in manufacturing type operations. 
     Other filters (with other pore sizes) can be used in the first filtration step (in Examples 7 and 8) to keep many of the larger extracted molecules from being exposed to potential microbial action. If used, the resulting extract would be less modified and a less modified tobacco would result. 
     EXAMPLE 9 
     This example demonstrates the ability of Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC Accession No. 19367) to degrade nitrates in tobacco. 
     Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC Accession No. 19367) was grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract broth (+0.5% YE) prepared as in Example 1. Control and experimental culture broths were pH adjusted to ˜7.2 prior to use with 2.4 ml of 1N NaOH/flask. All flasks were incubated at 30° C. and 160 rpm for 24 hours. Those flasks used for cell growth were inoculated at 2% (v/v) rate with Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 19367). 
     The accompanying table illustrates the nitrate degradation by this culture. 
     
         ______________________________________SET ITime (hrs)          pH     NO.sub.3 (μg/ml)______________________________________Control Broth (Uninoculated) 0                  7.28   2,251 6                  7.19   2,28124                  7.18   2,025Experimental Broth(Inoculated) 0                  7.19   1,975 6                  7.10   2,03124                  8.18     51______________________________________ 
    
     Micrococcus denitrificans was grown in the same broth as shown above and chemical analyses were performed at a different intermediate time interval with the following results: 
     
         ______________________________________SET 2Time (hrs)          pH     NO.sub.3 (μg/ml)______________________________________Control Broth (Uninoculated) 0                  7.28   2,251 6                  7.19   2,28124                  7.18   2,025Experimental Broth(Inoculated) 0                  7.22   2,22618                  7.92   1,60524                  8.17      0______________________________________ 
    
     The experimental cultures from Sets 1 and 2 were used to treat burley lamina for 24 hours at 30° C. in plastic bags as follows: 
     
         ______________________________________Materials for Treatment  Tobacco                       Inoculum  (gm)     1N NH.sub.4 OH (ml)                        Water (ml)                                (ml)______________________________________Treated  50       10.3          69.5   70.2Control  50       10.3         139.7   0______________________________________  Treatment  Time            pH     NO.sub.3 (%)______________________________________Set 1   0 hrs.         7.34   2.91Treated  24 hrs.         7.28   1.07Control   0 hrs.         7.48   2.87  24 hrs.         7.09   2.58Set 2   0 hrs.         7.49   3.10Treated  24 hrs.         7.43   1.86Control   0 hrs.         7.43   3.32  24 hrs.         7.04   3.61______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen that Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 19367) degraded up to 63% of the nitrate in burley lamina while the control tobacco showed little decrease in nitrate. 
     EXAMPLE 10 
     This example demonstrates the effectiveness of Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC Accession No. 17741) in removing nitrate from an extract of a reconstituted tobacco mixture. 
     A water extract was prepared as follows: 
     150 g of reconstituted tobacco was pulped in one liter of water for about one minute in a Waring blender. The mixture was held at room temperature for 10 minutes after which the liquid was centrifugally separated and brought back to original volume for sterilization at 121° C. and 15 psig for 15 minutes. Yeast extract (YE) was added at 0.5% (wt/v) rate prior to sterilization. Flue-cured/burley stem extract (with 0.5% yeast extract added and prepared as in Example 1) was used for standard extract. Broth pH was adjusted prior to inoculating the standard (&#34;control&#34;) extract and the experimental extract with Micrococcus denitrificans. 
     The following results were obtained: 
     
         ______________________________________Growth Time (hrs)            NO.sub.3 (μg/ml)                       pH______________________________________STANDARD EXTRACT 0               1,896      7.3724                  0       8.07EXPERIMENTAL EXTRACT 0               2.220      7.3124               2,256      6.9548                 227      7.95______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen that this data illustrates that the culture can effectively degrade the nitrate of an extract of reconstituted tobaccos. 
     EXAMPLE 11 
     This example demonstrates the effects of aerobic and anaerobic tobacco treatments. 
     Micrococcus dentrificans (ATCC No. 17741) was grown in flue-cured/burley stem extract broth with 0.5% yeast extract added for 24 hours in a New Brunswick Scientific Fermentor (MF 214) under the following conditions: 
     
         ______________________________________Parameters______________________________________Agitation (rpm)         300Aeration (cc/min.)      0Medium Flue-cured/Burley Stem Extract                   +0.5% YEMedium Vol. (liters)    8Temperature (°C.)                   30pH starting (uncontrolled)                     7.8Inoc. Rate (%)          5Inoc. Age (hrs)         24Antifoam (Dow/Chemical) P-1200______________________________________ 
    
     The culture at initiation and at 24 hours was characterized by: 
     
         ______________________________________Time           NO.sub.3(hrs)          (μg/ml)                   pH______________________________________ 0             2169     7.7424              52      8.20______________________________________ 
    
     At 24 hours, the culture was used to treat burley tobacco under aerobic and anaerobic conditions with the following results: 
     
         ______________________________________   Time (hrs)   0            24   pH      (%) NO.sub.3                    pH        (%) NO.sub.3______________________________________Aerobic TreatmentsControl   7.20      3.39     7.41    3.27Treatment 7.59      3.39     7.92    1.81Anaerobic TreatmentsControl   6.93      3.39     7.03    3.79Treatment 7.49      3.39     7.65    1.61______________________________________ 
    
     All tobaccos were at ˜75% moisture content and were stored at 30° C. for 24 hours in plastic bags. Anaerobic treatments were conducted in BBL (Baltimore Biological Laboratories) &#34;Gaspak&#34; anaerobic system jars using BBL catalyst to tie up atmospheric oxygen. 
     It is seen from the above data that the present invention can be carried out under anaerobic conditions and under conditions when availability of oxygen is not controlled. 
     EXAMPLE 12 
     This example demonstrates the effect of treating tobacco with cells as well as supernatant liquor from the cell growth. 
     Micrococcus denitrificans (ATCC No. 17741) was grown in flasks of flue-cured/burley stem extract broth, with 0.5% (wt/vol) yeast extract added, prepared as in Example 1(c). Flask inoculation and incubation were conducted as described in Example 1(d). At the end of the growth period, the culture was processed as shown in FIG. 1. ##STR1## 
     The following resulted from the operations shown in the Figure. 
     
                       TABLE______________________________________CULTURE PREPARATIONFLUE-CURED/BURLEY EXTRACT BROTH WITH 0.5% YE                  NO.sub.3        Time (hrs)                  (μg/ml)                           pH______________________________________Control         0          1618     7.13(Uninoculated) 24          1550     7.04Inoculated      0          1575     7.20          24           36      8.02Resuspended cells            0      8.18Supernatant                 34      8.15Filtered Supernatant        36      8.26______________________________________ 
    
     Resuspended cells and filtered supernatant were used to inoculate separate fresh flasks of flue-cured/burley extract broth at 10 ml/flask (250 ml extract/500 ml flask) and incubated at 30° C. for 24 hours at 160 rpm. Extract was prepared as in Example 1. The following was obtained: 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________                 NO.sub.3       Time (hrs)                 (μg/ml)                          pH______________________________________Resuspended cells          0          1530     7.00         24            0      8.11Filtered supernatant          0          1576     7.11         24          1464     6.99______________________________________ 
    
     Resuspended cells, original culture, filtered supernatant and unfiltered supernatant were all used separately to treat 50 gm samples of flue-cured/burley stem at about 75% moisture for 24 hours at 30° C. in plastic bags. A control sample was pH adjusted and water treated without inoculum. 
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________MATERIALS ADDED FOR TOBACCO TREATMENTS        Sterile        Distilled  1N NaOH    InoculumTobacco Treated By:        Water (ml) Base (ml)  (ml)______________________________________Control (none)        140.2      9.8        noneOriginal Culture        96.1       9.8        44.1Resuspended cells        96.1       9.8        44.1Supernatant  96.1       9.8        44.1Filtered Supernatant        96.1       9.8        44.1______________________________________ 
    
     The following results were obtained from these tobacco treatments (Table 4). 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________TOBACCO TREATMENTS        Time (hrs)                  NO.sub.3 (%)                           pH______________________________________Control (no inoculum)           0          4.57     6.97          24          4.65     7.09Original culture           0          4.41     7.18          24          2.86     7.59Resuspended cells           0          4.52     7.01          24          0.94     7.65Supernatant     0          4.45     7.27          24          4.38     7.13Filtered supernatant           0          4.41     7.07          24          4.48     7.15______________________________________ 
    
     It can be seen from the above data that the supernatant liquor in which the culture is grown does not provide sufficient culture for degradation of nitrates in tobacco.