Abstract:
A method of detecting weather on an aircraft uses a weather radar system. The method adapts the weather radar system in accordance with a time-of-year parameter, a time-of-day parameter, and/or a location parameter to remove ground clutter reflectivity. The method includes determining the particular parameter and automatically adjusting the weather radar system to display the weather in response to the parameter. The system can be implemented in hardware and/or software and can advantageously predict and identify weather and/or weather hazards more precisely.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS 
     The present application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority benefit from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/402,434 filed on Apr. 12, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,219. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of and claims priority benefit from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/527,878 filed on Sep. 27, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,088. Further, the present application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority benefit from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/515,642 filed Sep. 5, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,808,422, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/256,845 filed Oct. 24, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,902, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/631,253 filed Jul. 31, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,885. Each of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/402,434, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,219 U.S. application Ser. No. 11/527,878, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,088 U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/515,642, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,808,422 U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/256,845, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,902 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/631,253, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,885 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND 
     Conventionally, pilots use weather radar to detect and avoid hazardous weather. Conventional radar systems may produce the desired results only in a limited environment. Typically, airborne threshold systems use thresholds for wet precipitation derived from ground-based weather radar thresholds which were generated from convective weather detections. Such thresholds have been set in accordance with reflectivity data which is applicable to typical convective weather systems. It has been observed that for airborne applications ground clutter causes differences in reflectivity which may cause inaccurate weather indications. A feature of conventional radar systems is the ability to suppress display of returns from the ground in favor of returns from weather. These ground clutter suppression systems may have limited effectiveness with certain local geographical conditions, such as in the presence of cities, especially cities near bodies of water, and with tall objects, such as towers beyond the horizon. Such ground clutter may erroneously be presented as a weather target. Conventionally, weather radar ground clutter suppression systems may rely on different return signals resulting from radar beam sweeps occurring at different beam elevations. Even so, many geographical phenomena may not be suppressed using present ground clutter suppression systems. 
     Conventionally, radar thresholds map radar return strength to a display with color representing rain rate or alternatively a weather threat assessment level. The threat level has been previously described as primarily a function of radar reflectivity and a weaker function of temperature, altitude, and latitude. However, because of various geographical phenomena, the conventional mapping, while useful, does not completely allow successful operation of aircraft in difficult geographic situations. The higher reflectivity of these geographic phenomena produces erroneous detection of significant convective weather systems during flight. Further, because of the ability of aircraft flying over such geographical phenomena to circumnavigate storm systems, when believed to be present, it would therefore be desirable to provide an airborne radar system which has the ability to more accurately detect and report the existence and/or characteristics of storms when operating in various geographically diverse environments. 
     It may be possible for a pilot operating a radar manually to be able to compensate for the differences in geographical phenomena as each pilot becomes familiar with the environment. However, knowledge by the pilot must be acquired, and further, an increase in pilot workload is also necessitated. Therefore, there is a need for an automated system of adjusting radar thresholds based on the presence of a variety of geographical phenomena. 
     In addition, ground clutter reflectivity can vary by time of day and time of year, in various geographical regions. For example, dew forming on grass increases ground reflectivity. Ground reflectivity also may vary depending on whether forests are leaf covered or bare or whether fields are filled or fully vegetated. Similarly, snow covered landscapes reflect differently than green grasslands. Thus, it may be desirable to identify ground clutter in accordance with temporal information. 
     In addition, weather characteristics can change according to seasonal and time-of-day variations. For example, certain radar reflectivities occurring during the monsoon season may indicate hazardous weather while those same radar reflectivities would indicate non-hazardous weather during another season. Similarly, weather radar returns at a certain time-of-day are more likely to indicate the presence of hazardous weather (e.g., afternoon) while those same returns are less likely to indicate the presence of a hazard at another time-of-day (e.g., early morning). Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a radar system which can compensate radar detection in accordance with both temporal and spatial information. 
     Accordingly, there is a need to adjust weather radar detection and ground clutter suppression schemes based upon a specific geographic location, time-of-day, and/or season (time-of-year). There is further a need to adjust weather radar systems by adjusting display thresholds, tilt angle, and/or system gain. Yet further, there is a need for a weather radar system that automatically adjusts to location time-of-day, and/or time-of-year. Yet further still, there is a need to adjust weather radar systems by adjusting thresholds and parameters based on known ground clutter locations. 
     It would be desirable to provide a system and/or method that provides one or more of these or other advantageous features. Other features and advantages will be made apparent from the present specification. The teachings disclosed extend to those embodiments which fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the aforementioned needs. 
     SUMMARY 
     An exemplary embodiment relates to a method of detecting weather on an aircraft using a weather radar system. The method includes determining a location of reflective radar targets, accessing a database having information relating to ground clutter of the reflective radar targets, retrieving weather radar information associated with the location and automatically adjusting the weather radar return thresholds in response to the information. 
     Another exemplary embodiment relates to a method of adapting an aircraft weather radar system. The method includes determining at least one of a time-of-year parameter, a time-of-day parameter, or a location parameter. The method also includes automatically adjusting the weather radar system radar return display thresholds to display weather in response to at least one of the time-of-year parameter, time-of-day parameter, or location parameter. 
     Still another exemplary embodiment relates to an airborne weather radar system carried on an aircraft. The airborne weather radar system includes a radar antenna system and a processing means for adjusting display thresholds of the weather radar system. The processing means adjusts performance of the weather radar system based on a location of known ground clutter targets. 
     Yet still another exemplary embodiment relates to a method of creating a weather radar display threshold database. The method comprises receiving, by a ground-based weather radar system, weather radar returns for a location. The method also comprises receiving by an airborne based weather radar system weather radar returns over the location. Further, the method comprises determining a display threshold for the airborne based weather radar system which provides a substantial match of the ground-based weather radar returns and the airborne based weather radar returns. 
     Alternative exemplary embodiments relate to other features and combinations of features as may be generally recited in the claims. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which: 
         FIG. 1  is an exemplary diagram of an airplane having a weather radar system and flying in the atmosphere; 
         FIG. 2  is an exemplary block diagram of a radar system having an adjustable threshold circuit; 
         FIG. 3  is another exemplary block diagram of an airborne weather radar system capable of adjusting to time-of-day, season, and/or location; 
         FIG. 4  is an exemplary flow diagram of the operation of the airborne weather radar system illustrated in  FIG. 3  in accordance with an exemplary embodiment; 
         FIG. 5  is an exemplary flow diagram of the operation of the airborne weather radar system illustrated in  FIG. 3  in accordance with yet another exemplary embodiment; 
         FIG. 6  is an exemplary flow diagram of an airborne weather radar system using ground based returns in accordance with still another exemplary embodiment. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Before describing in detail the particular improved system and method, it should be observed that the invention includes, but is not limited to a novel structural combination of conventional data/signal processing components and circuits, and not in the particular detailed configurations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, methods, functions, control and arrangement of conventional components and circuits have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block representations and schematic diagrams, in order not to obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the description herein. Further, the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments depicted in the exemplary diagrams, but should be construed in accordance with the language in the claims. 
     In conventional aircraft systems, radar systems attempt to detect weather which may be a threat to the aircraft or passengers. However, in environments in which ground clutter or other ground reflectivity effects are pronounced, the radar systems may misidentify ground as threatening weather. As a result, air carriers attempt to circumvent weather systems which are nonexistent and thereby waste precious fuel and time. 
     Radar ground clutter suppression is hampered by local geographical phenomena. For example, cities near bodies of water and tall objects such as radio towers beyond the horizon sometimes violate the assumptions made during the design of general ground clutter suppression algorithms. The result is that ground clutter leaks through the suppression algorithms and is erroneously presented to the pilot as a weather target. 
     Conventional radar ground clutter suppression algorithms rely on the vertical gradient of the return signals resulting from multiple radar sweeps occurring at different beam elevations. The ground clutter suppression algorithms and beam tilt algorithms are designed to reject clutter under a wide variety of conditions. Unfortunately, some geographic phenomena may defeat the generally optimized algorithm, resulting in ground clutter being presented to the pilot as weather. This issue has been observed in many conventional systems. 
     The trade-off which normally occurs during design of ground clutter suppression algorithms is between ground clutter suppression and weather detection. Further increase in the radar&#39;s ability to provide accurate ground clutter suppression will result in an overall decrease in the radar&#39;s ability to perform its primary function of weather detection. Much of the observed ground clutter leakage is localized and is tied to understood phenomena. For instance, ground objects with very high reflectivity located near relatively low reflective bodies of water may defeat the conventional ground clutter suppression algorithms. The highly reflective city of Chicago located on the shore of Lake Michigan is a prime example. A general modification of the ground clutter suppression algorithm to eliminate ground clutter leakage from the Chicago point target would unacceptably decrease the radar&#39;s ability to detect weather across the entire radar display area. 
     Localized threshold optimization methods may be used to improve weather radar ground clutter suppression algorithms. The weather radar may contain a local terrain database which is currently used to determine optimal tilt angle. This database can also be tagged with localized clutter suppression/weather detection threshold information which can be processed to minimize the probability of ground clutter leakage over specific geographical areas. Even though the threshold over such “problem” areas can be locally tuned to favor ground clutter suppression, weather detection over such areas will actually be improved since it is impossible to accurately display weather phenomena over areas where ground clutter is actively leaking onto the display. 
     The position of the aircraft relative to the “problem” geographical feature can be used to qualify the use of the threshold information. The tops of tall, reflective objects such as weather towers poke above the horizon and result in ground clutter leakage. These objects are only a problem when they lie at a specific distance from the aircraft. Specific phenomena such as weather towers can be tagged as “horizon-only” problems and local optimization of clutter thresholds can occur based on their position relative to the local horizon. 
     Previous approaches to ground clutter suppression involved various algorithms including, but not limited to active editing of return data. Such editing is done by accessing a terrain database and identifying areas of typically higher reflectivity and removing any radar returns from that area. The key techniques, methodologies, and systems provided herein are an improvement over editing of radar returns. 
     Referring to  FIG. 1 , an aircraft  100  is depicted having a radar on-board capable of casting a radar beam  190  and receiving reflective energy from weather systems  125 ,  130 ,  135 , and the like. Weather systems  125 ,  130 , and  135  may be representative of any variety of weather systems. Convective weather system  130  may be over a city  140  having a plurality of buildings  142 . City,  140  maybe on the shores of a major body of water  145 . 
     Referring now to  FIG. 2 , a radar system  200  includes a radar antenna  210  for sending and receiving radar signals. System  200  also includes an adjustable gain circuit  220  that is configured to change the gain of the radar signal provided to or received from radar antenna  210 . Processing device  230  receives time and date data from time/date sensor  240  and radar tilt sensor  250 , among other systems and sensors. Further, processing device  230  receives location data from an aircraft location sensor  245 , such as but not limited to a GPS receiver. In an exemplary embodiment, processing device  230  also accesses a database  260  which contains information relating to known ground clutter locations based on the location of the aircraft. Processing device  230  may also be configured with instructions which calculate and/or determine an appropriate adjustable threshold command via a control law which is based on the location of the aircraft, the known ground clutter location, the time-of-day, the time-of-year, etc. The adjustable threshold command is to be communicated to an adjustable threshold circuit  232  based on data supplied to processing circuit  230  such as but not limited to the locations of the aircraft, locations of known ground clutter, time-of-day, time-of-year, temperature inputs, and the radar beam direction. As shown, adjustable threshold circuit  232  is running on processor  230 , however adjustable threshold circuit is not limited to the depicted structure but may be running on a different processor or a dedicated circuit or processor. Further, other information such as latitude, longitude, maritime, or continental, etc. may also be used to make the gain adjustment. Database 260 may be used to describe whether a specific location (i.e., latitude, longitude) is near a known ground clutter target. The database may be generated from a table of altitudes versus latitude/longitude. 
     A threshold control law used in adjustable threshold circuit  232  may be based on any of a number of factors, including but not limited to the location of the aircraft, the location of ground clutter, the location of bodies of water, the time-of-day, the time-of-year, etc. The thresholds may be adjusted according to these characteristics using adjustable threshold circuit  232 , and thereby display, on display  234 , the appropriate weather-hazard alert or condition. Other types of alerts may also be used and be based on the adjustable thresholds, including but not limited to visual and aural warnings. In an exemplary embodiment, location, time, date, etc. may be used to predict ground reflectivity so ground clutter can be suppressed. Also, in an exemplary embodiment, location, date, time, etc. may be used to adjust thresholds to more accurately depict weather hazards. 
     In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, any type of weather radar that operates in a range of environments may be used. This includes, but is not limited to simple auto-tilt radars, manual radars, as well as fully automatic systems including but not limited to the WXR-2100 multiscan radar available from Rockwell Collins of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 
     In an alternative embodiment, system  200  may be used to control antenna tilt, gain control on the receive side, gain control on the transmit side, as well as thresholds. 
     The database may be used to bias the threshold process, the gain control process, or antenna tilt. Antenna beams which impinge on known ground clutter have their effective gain reduced during sampled ranges that have that interaction. This allows known ground clutter to not be displayed to the pilot and allows increased weather detection characteristics in areas of typically high reflectivity. The gain reduction system differs from an editing system in that boundary values may be softened to reduce the effects of identification mistakes and still allow weather detection in the area influenced by land, island, or mountain targets. 
     In a similar manner, the thresholds used in multibeam clutter rejection processes may be modified by using the database to improve weather detection margins and improve clutter removal robustness. This may allow lower antenna beam angle to interrogate weather while providing clutter rejection for precipitous terrain. 
     With reference to  FIG. 3 , weather radar system  300  is similar to system  200  described above. System  300  may utilize any type of base hardware including the hardware associated with conventional weather radar systems manufactured by Rockwell Collins, Inc. and Honeywell International. System  300  is advantageously configured to automatically adjust to a particular location parameter, time-of-day parameter, and/or season parameter. 
     The location parameter can provide a precise latitude and longitude, a general area, a distance along a flight plan or other type of location indicator. The location parameter can be provided by any type of location sensor including but not limited to a GPS system. The location parameter can also be provided from an off-airplane source or be derived from flight plans and time-of-flight parameters. 
     System  300  preferably includes a tilt control circuit  304 , a radar antenna  301 , a receive transmit circuit  308 , a memory  303 , a location circuit  312 , a clock circuit  314 , a date circuit  316 , a display  306 , and a processor  305 . Processor  305  may include a display threshold adjustment circuit  324 . Circuit  324  may operate in accordance with the description provided above. Gain control circuit  309  can operate on the receive end or the transmit end. Preferably, gain control circuit  309  operates on the transmit end and is controlled by a signal from processor  305  or alternatively operates in processor  305 . 
     Location circuit  312  provides a location parameter to processor  305 . In one embodiment, the location parameter can indicate a specific geographic area in which known ground clutter targets exist by comparing the present location of the aircraft with locations of known ground clutter stored in memory  303  or a database, etc. Some specific geographic regions that have particular ground clutter characteristics include cities which are often highly reflective. In particular, large cities by large bodies of water, mountains, buildings on the horizon, and other similar features may be very highly reflective. 
     In an alternative embodiment, the location parameter can indicate a specific region having a predetermined target area. For example, the location parameter can be any area, but typical examples would be in the range of a several square mile region. The size and/or borders of regions can change as a function of location, time-of-day, and/or season. 
     Clock circuit  314  provides an indication of time-of-day to processor  305 . Date circuit  316  provides a time-of-year indication to processor  305 . Although shown as coupled directly to processor  305 , circuits  312 ,  314 , and  316  can be incorporated within processor  305  and can even be provided wholly or at least partially as a software sub-routine. In addition, circuits  312 ,  314 ,  316  can communicate with processor  305  through memory  303 . Processor  305  does not need to communicate through memory  303  and can communicate directly with receive/transmit circuit  308 . 
     Processor  305  can provide control signals to tilt control circuit  304  and gain control circuit  309 . System  300  can be adjusted through processor  305  to take into account a location parameter from circuit  312 , a time-of-day parameter from circuit  314 , and a time-of-year parameter from circuit  316 . Processor  305  preferably automatically adjusts at least one of display threshold circuit  324 , tilt control circuit  304 , and gain control circuit  309 . The adjustment preferably makes the sensing of weather regions and their severity more accurate and allows more accurate removal of ground clutter. Gain control circuit  309  can control the gain associated with the transmit end or the receive end of signals provided to and from antenna  301 . 
     Antenna controlled elevations, radar gains, weather detection thresholds, and ground clutter rejection thresholds can also be a function of time-of-year and time-of-day. As an example of time-of-year adjustments, consider the changes in ground reflectivity with changes in snow cover and grass cover, seasonal changes in forest foliation and defoliation, etc. An example of time-of-day adjustment may involve the presence of dew causing increased reflectivity during early morning, etc. 
     With reference to  FIG. 4 , a flow diagram  400  depicts the operation of circuit  300 . Processor  305  preferably operates software to implement flow diagram  400 . A location parameter, time-of-day parameter, and/or seasonal parameter is determined (process  410 ). The antenna tilt is then adjusted in accordance with the parameter or the gain is adjusted in accordance with the parameter (process  420 ). Radar return thresholds, display thresholds, and/or ground clutter rejection thresholds may also be adjusted based on the parameters to support the ground clutter rejection (process  430 ) and to optimize weather detection. Processor  305  processes radar returns (process  440 ). Processor  305  then provides indications of hazards and/or weather on display  306  (process  450 ). 
     With reference to  FIG. 5 , a flow diagram  500  depicts operation of system  300  in accordance with another embodiment. Processor  305  preferably operates software to implement flow diagram  500 . A location parameter, time-of-day parameter, or seasonal parameter is determined (process  510 ). Radar returns are processed in processor  305  (process  520 ). The threshold associated with the display of hazards or weather is adjusted (process  530 ). Indications of hazards and/or weather are then displayed on display  306  (process  540 ). Thresholds may be adjusted on a complete radar sample environment or on a radar resolution cell by radar resolution cell basis. In one embodiment, thresholds preferably slew smoothly from space/time region to space/time region with step changes preferably not being allowed. 
     Referring now to  FIG. 6 , a method  600  of creating a weather radar display threshold database comprises receiving weather radar returns from ground-based weather radar from a location (process  610 ). The method also comprises receiving weather radar returns from an airborne based weather radar over a location (process  620 ). Once the weather radar returns have been received, a comparison may be made of the airborne and ground based weather radar returns (process  630 ). Once this comparison is accomplished a substantial match of the airborne based returns and the ground-based returns may be made by providing display thresholds (process  640 ). In accordance with other exemplary embodiments, a plurality of learning systems may be applied in order to determine the display thresholds needed to achieve, in an optimal manner, the matching airborne based weather radar returns being displayed. 
     While the detailed drawings, specific examples and particular formulations given describe preferred and exemplary embodiments, they serve the purpose of illustration only. The inventions disclosed are not limited to the specific forms shown. For example, the methods may be performed in any of a variety of sequence of steps. The hardware and software configurations shown and described may differ depending on the chosen performance characteristics and physical characteristics of the radar system devices. For example, the type of device, communications bus, or processor used may differ. The systems and methods depicted and described are not limited to the precise details and conditions disclosed. Furthermore, other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.