Abstract:
A method of fabricating a high performance capacitor that may be incorporated into a standard CMOS fabrication process suitable for submicron devices is described. The parameters used in the standard CMOS process may be maintained, particularly for the definition and etch of the lower electrode layer. To reduce variation in critical dimension width, an Anti-Reflective Layer (ARL) is used. In the preferred embodiment, this is of the Plasma Enhanced chemical vapor deposition Anti-Reflective Layer (PEARL) type, although other Anti-Reflective Coatings (ARCs) or layers, such as a conductive film like TiN may be employed. This ARL formation occurs after the capacitor specific process steps, but prior to the masking used for defining the lower electrodes. In one embodiment, a Rapid Thermal Oxidation (RTO) is performed subsequent to removing the unwanted capacitor dielectric layer from the transistor poly outside of the capacitor regions, but prior to the PEARL deposition. Another embodiment instead eliminates the capacitor dielectric removal step, which is then replaced by a step to form an additional layer which, in a second step, is then etched away to leave spacers on the capacitor sides, thereby eliminating any undercutting of the dielectric.

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
   This invention relates to the fabrication of semiconductor devices as it applies to integrated circuits, and more specifically, to methods for the fabrication of capacitors in such a process. 
   As the scale of integrated circuits has decreased, a number of new techniques have been introduced to the manufacturing process. One of these is the use of Anti-Reflective Layers (ARLs). These include both grown or deposited varieties, such as Titanium Nitride or a Plasma Enhanced chemical vapor deposition Anti-Reflective Layer (PEARL), and coatings, such as an Anti-Reflective Coating (ARC). 
   The purpose of the ARL is to reduce net linewidth variations in the photolithographic process. Variations that are allowable within a 1 μm or even 0.6 μm process become unacceptable as devices move deeper into the submicron range. A variation of, for example, ±0.1 μm or even ±0.15 μm in Critical Dimension (CD) may be tolerable at 1 μm, but would produce a factor of 2 or 3 difference between the upper and lower values at the 0.3 μm scale. Such variations in transistor gate length can undermine device performance and reliability, particularly on the low side. An ARL layer can readily reduce such variations in CD width by a third when compared to the same process without this layer. 
   The ARL is an additional step included as part of the photolithographic process. It is a highly absorbing film formed directly on the substrate and upon which the photoresist then is formed. The ARL absorbs most of the radiation that penetrates the resist, generally in the 70–85% range. Standing waves are thereby substantially reduced as there is less reflection off the substrate and scattering from topological features is also suppressed. In addition, as an ARL partially planarizes the wafer topology, resist thickness is more uniform and linewidth variation over steps is improved. 
   This effect is shown in  FIG. 1 , where CD in units of μm is plotted against resist thickness in units of Angstroms. The shown data points are for a set of reference structures formed to measure variations in critical dimension. The lower line, with data points indicated by a series of xs, corresponds to a series of dense features without the use of an ARL. This curve is very sensitive to variations in resist thickness and shows a periodic structure due to standing waves. 
   The top three lines show the use of an ARL. The line formed on the solid squares corresponds to the same dense features as the non-ARL line of xs and may be compared directly. The ARL line varies in a much smoother fashion than the non-ARL curve and is therefore far less sensitive to processing variations. The line of open triangles, corresponding to isolated features with the same structure as solid squares, and the line of solid circles, corresponding to a different structure, also show the uniformity produced by using an anti-reflective layer. 
   As is often the case with process technology, the solution to one problem often creates a new problem, or, in this case, causes a latent problem to manifest itself. The particular problem here is the ability to integrate a high performance capacitor into a standard CMOS process flow, where capacitor performance is defined in terms of stability over a wide voltage range and low leakage levels. 
   A more or less standard embodiment of a portion of this process flow can be given by the following series of steps: 
   Standard Transistor Flow 
   
       
       
         
             1 . Lower electrode deposition 
             2 . Lower electrode doping 
             3 . Lower electrode anneal
 
Capacitor Process Module
 
             4 . Capacitor dielectric deposition 
             5 . Upper electrode deposition 
             6 . Upper electrode implant 
             7 . Upper electrode anneal 
             8 . Photo mask to define upper electrode 
             9 . Upper electrode etch 
             10 . Capacitor dielectric removal
 
Standard Transistor Flow continued
 
             11 . ARL formation 
             12 . Photo mask to define lower electrode 
             13 . Lower electrode etch 
             14 . Poly oxidation for transistor and subsequent steps,
 
where the subsequent steps would include the standard fabrication steps, such as masking and implantation to form the transistors&#39; source and drain, as well as any common but optional steps, such as, for example, the formation of a Lightly Doped Drain (LDD). Some of the steps on this list are themselves optional but common, such as the anneal of steps  3  and  7  or, what is more pertinent here, step  11 .
 
         
       
     
  
   This list of steps is broken into three parts. Steps  1 – 3  are common to both the formation of transistors for the device as well as the capacitors. If the capacitors were not needed, the process would proceed directly from step  3  to step  11  for the ARL to be applied and steps  4 – 10  eliminated. The inclusion of steps  4 – 10  allows the fabrication of a high performance capacitor to be integrated into this standard CMOS process flow. In this way, these steps can be added as a group, or module, when the device being fabricated requires capacitors and otherwise deleted without changing the non-capacitor, transistor steps or flow. A variation could define and etch the lower electrode before the capacitor dielectric is formed, but it is preferred to integrate this with the etch of the standard transistor flow, particularly at 0.35 μm and below. 
   Step  4  forms a dielectric for the capacitors, such as an oxide, an Oxide-Nitride-Oxide (ONO) sandwich, oxynitride, or one of the other standard variations. Steps  5 – 9  form the upper electrodes, the lower electrodes having been formed, but not defined, at the same time as those for the transistors in steps  1 – 3 . This leaves the capacitor dielectric at the end of step  9 . This dielectric could be left at this stage and step  10  eliminated, its removal being incorporated into step  13  when the lower electrodes are etched. This would, however, require a revision of steps  12  and  13  as having this extra layer still on the substrate would change the reflectivity of the stack. The various settings for all the process parameters would then need to be recalibrated accordingly. Aside from the practical difficulties and complexities this would introduce, it would also mean that steps  4 – 10  were no longer an independent “module” which could be inserted or deleted depending on device requirements. For this reason, step  10  is included for ease of integration into the standard CMOS process. 
   Step  11  follows and is included for the reasons described earlier. It is an optional step and introduces an added layer of complexity to the process. For this reason it is normally omitted for device near or above the micron level, but is increasingly standard as devices move ever deeper into the submicron range. 
   The problem in this process as found in the prior art is in the juxtaposition of step  10  with step  11 . It is this combination of the dielectric removal with the application of an anti-reflective layer having poor insulation properties that is detrimental to the capacitors. 
   This problem is that step  10  not only removes the unwanted capacitor dielectric, but will also undercut into the wanted portion below the upper electrode. This situation is shown in  FIG. 3 , which represents the process through step  10 . This shows the undefined lower electrode layer  120  upon the field oxide or other underlying layers  130  included to electrically isolate it. The upper electrode  140  has been defined and etched, and is separated from the lower electrode  120  by the dielectric layer  160 . Ideally, the dielectric  160  would have its sides even with those of the upper electrode. Instead, it suffers from the undercutting indicated at  180 . 
   If processing were to continue as is common for a 1 μm or even 0.6 μm, namely, without the ARL of step  11 , this would not cause any major problems. In this case, steps  12  and  13  define and etch the lower electrode immediately after step  10 ; and are themselves followed by the formation of the transistor oxide in step  14 . At this point, again with step  11  absent, this undercutting will have been filled back in by a non-conductor such as BPSG, a silicate glass, and degradation of the capacitors&#39; dielectric will be minimal or non-existent. 
   This is demonstrated in  FIGS. 10 and 11 , where the solid diamonds represent this process without the ARL of step  11 .  FIG. 10  shows cumulative probability vs. capacitor leakage current at 5 volts, with the horizontal scale logarithmic in units of fA/μm 2 . For the process without an anti-reflective layer, this is a nearly vertical line at a value of 10 −1.5 ≈0.03 fA/μm 2 .  FIG. 11  is a plot of cumulative probability vs. capacitor voltage coefficient. This is a measure of capacitance as a function of the voltage across its plates. For an idealized conducting electrode capacitor, capacitance is independent of voltage, and the graph would be a vertical line at 0. For a capacitor formed on a semiconductor device, the plates of the capacitor are now of doped silicon or similar material, and the deviation from this ideal is measured in PPM per volt. The line should still be as vertical as possible, for device consistency, and as close to zero as possible, for the best performance of the individual capacitors. The solid diamonds of the non-ARL process are again nearly vertical and with a magnitude of just over 20 PPM/V, the negative values show how the coefficient is defined. This set of points, the solid diamonds, can be seen as reference values against which a fully integrated process can be measured. 
   With the inclusion of both steps  10  and  11 , this undercutting is now filled in by the less benign ARL. In particular, PEARL is a silicon rich Si x ON y  film and is expected to be a poor insulator, resulting in high leakage currents. This will greatly degrade both device performance, due to leakage well beyond design specifications, and stability, as variations in performance will vary over a wide voltage range of values as the amount of undercutting will vary from capacitor to capacitor. This is shown on  FIGS. 10 and 11  by the solid squares. In  FIG. 10 , these points are well to the right of the reference values with leakage currents of, at best, several orders of magnitude higher. In  FIG. 11 , these points are far from vertical, showing a capacitance that is very voltage dependent due to excessive leakage. 
   Even when the undercutting,  180  of  FIG. 3 , is minimized or eliminated by using, say, a dry etch in step  10 , the combination of step  10  with step  11  can still cause capacitor degradation. Although the ARL no longer intrudes significantly into the inter-electrode region, its proximity still affects performance if the ARL is not sufficiently insulating, as is the case for PEARL. 
   Therefore, it is an objective of the present invention to integrate a high performance capacitor into a CMOS process flow, particularly where the flow incorporates an anti-reflective layer to reduce variations in critical dimension width. 
   SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION 
   These and additional objects are accomplished by the various aspects of the present invention, wherein, briefly and generally, a method of fabricating a high performance capacitor that may be incorporated into a standard CMOS fabrication process suitable for submicron devices. The parameters used in the standard CMOS process may be maintained, particularly for the definition and etch of the lower electrode layer that also serves as the transistor gate. To reduce variation in critical dimension width, an Anti-Reflective Layer (ARL) is used. In the preferred embodiment, this is of the Plasma Enhanced chemical vapor deposition Anti-Reflective Layer (PEARL) type, although other Anti-Reflective Coatings (ARCs) or layers, such as a conductive film like titanium nitride (TiN), may be used. This ARL formation occurs after the capacitor specific process steps, but prior to the masking used for defining the lower electrodes. 
   In one embodiment, a Rapid Thermal Oxidation (RTO) is performed subsequent to removing the unwanted capacitor dielectric layer from the transistor poly outside of the capacitor regions, but prior to the PEARL deposition. This RTO is thin enough to not require a reformulation, due to changes in reflectivity, of the later process steps used in forming the transistors and other subsequent devices, yet thick enough to alleviate the degradation of capacitor performance due to the PEARL filling in any undercutting that occurred when the capacitor dielectric layer was removed. This is found to produce capacitors with low leakage and stability over a wide voltage range, with values comparable to those obtained with the PEARL absent. 
   Another embodiment instead eliminates the capacitor dielectric removal step. It is then replaced by a step to form an additional layer which, in a second step, is then etched away to leave spacers on the capacitor sides, thereby eliminating any undercutting of the dielectric. These new steps are both prior to the ARL formation and, as with the other embodiment, improve capacitor performance. 
   A further embodiment also eliminates the capacitor dielectric layer removal step prior to the ARL formation and forms the ARL on the dielectric and upper capacitor electrodes. The dielectric is then removed at the same time as the lower capacitor electrodes and transistor gates are formed. 
   Additional objects, advantages, and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of its preferred embodiments, which description should be taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. 

   
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       FIG. 1  shows variations in critical dimension with resist thickness with and without an anti-reflective layer. 
       FIG. 2  shows an embodiment of the present invention at the stage where the upper electrode has been defined. 
       FIG. 3  shows the same embodiment after the excess capacitor dielectric has been removed. 
       FIG. 4  again shows the same embodiment of the present invention after forming a thin insulating layer. 
       FIG. 5  is a later stage of the same embodiment where an ARL has been applied. 
       FIG. 6  is the same as  FIG. 2 , but as the precursor to an alternate embodiment. 
       FIG. 7  shows the alternate embodiment after a capacitor spacer layer has been formed. 
       FIG. 8  is  FIG. 7  subsequent to etching. 
       FIG. 9  is the alternate embodiment after an ARL has been applied. 
       FIG. 10  shows cumulative probability plot for capacitor leakage of different embodiments. 
       FIG. 11  shows cumulative probability plot for capacitor voltage coefficient of different embodiments. 
       FIG. 12  is a flow chart of the embodiment of the present invention shown in  FIGS. 2–5 . 
   

   DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
   A primary objective of the present invention is to present a process for the integration of a high performance capacitor into a standard CMOS fabrication process flow. In this context, high performance is defined to consist of low leakage levels and stability over a wide voltage range as would be required to achieve a 12 bit or higher analog to digital conversion capability. It is preferred that the steps required to form these capacitors should not require any change in the process parameters for the non-capacitor stages. The preferred application of the described methods is in the submicron range, particularly on the order of 0.35 μm or below, where Anti-Reflective Layers (ARLs) are used to reduce variations in critical dimension width. The preferred ARLs are of the Plasma Enhanced chemical vapor deposition Anti-Reflective Layer (PEARL) variety, although others may be substituted, such as TiN. This invention is also applicable for any non-insulating and/or low dielectric strength layer placed on both electrodes of a capacitor after dielectric removal. 
   A preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in  FIG. 12  and given by the series of steps: 
   Standard Submicron Core Technology Flow 
   
       
       
         
             1 . Lower electrode formation 
             2 . Lower electrode doping 
             3 . Lower electrode anneal
 
Capacitor Process Module
 
             4 . Capacitor dielectric formation 
             5 . Upper electrode formation 
             6 . Upper electrode doping 
             7 . Upper electrode anneal 
             8 . Photo mask to define upper electrode 
             9 . Upper electrode etch 
             10 . Capacitor dielectric removal 
             10   a . RTO
 
Standard Submicron Core Technology Flow continued
 
             11  ARL/PEARL formation 
             12 . Photo mask to define lower electrode 
             13 . Lower electrode etch 
             14 . Poly oxidation for transistor and subsequent steps, where steps  9 – 11  are shown in  FIGS. 2–5 . Steps  1 – 3  and steps  11  on are part of the transistor fabrication process, while steps  4 – 10   a  are specific to capacitor formation. These steps differ from the more or less generic prior art by the inclusion of step  10   a . The next few paragraphs describe the details of these steps according to this preferred embodiment. 
         
       
     
  
   Taking up the process at the formation of the lower electrodes, steps  1 – 3  are part of the standard transistor formation flow and are common for both the capacitors and later transistor formation steps. In step  1 , the layer to serve as lower electrodes and the transistor gates is formed, preferably of amorphous silicon with a thickness of 2000 Å to 4000 Å. This layer is then doped in step  2 , preferably implanted using phosphorus dose levels of from 5×10 15  cm −2  to 2×10 16  cm −2 , although this could also be done in a non-implant method such as with POCl 3 . This is followed by the optional but common step of an anneal, preferably by Rapid Thermal Processing (RTP), with a furnace anneal as another possibility. 
   At this stage, the steps specific to capacitor formation occur. A capacitor dielectric is formed in step  4 , deposited or grown to a thickness in the range of 300 Å to 800 Å. Upon this dielectric the upper electrode is formed, doped, and annealed in steps  5 – 7 . In the preferred embodiment, this is amorphous silicon with a thickness in the range of 1500 Å to 2500 Å, which has again been implanted by phosphorus, now with a dose in the 0.5−15×10 16  cm −2  range, and subjected to an RTP anneal. Alternate embodiments could use other conductors such as TiN or tungsten for the electrode or, as with the lower electrode, other doping and annealing techniques. The upper electrode is then masked and etched in steps  9  and  10 , leaving the structure shown in  FIG. 2 . 
   The right hand side of  FIG. 2  corresponds to the capacitor sector and shows the defined upper electrode  140  on the capacitor dielectric  160 , which is in turn on the lower electrode  120 . The left hand side of  FIG. 2 , and  FIGS. 3–9 , correspond to the transistor sector of the device at the same stage as the capacitor sector on the right. At this stage the dielectric layer  160  has not been etched and the lower electrode is doped but undefined. The field oxide or other underlying layers  130  are included to electrically isolate the lower electrode/transistor gate layer  120 . 
   Step  10  is the etch of the capacitor dielectric. In the preferred embodiment, this is a Buffered Oxide Etch (BOE), although other embodiments could employ a dry or other etch. Still another embodiment could completely dispense with this etch, but as discussed below, this would complicate the integration of the capacitor process steps into the larger process due to transistor gate length variation. 
   The result of this process is shown in  FIG. 3 . In this figure, the unwanted portions of the dielectric layer  160  have been removed in preparation for the PEARL deposition. An unwanted consequence of step  10  is that, as discussed in the background section, some of the wanted dielectric is also removed. This is the undercutting indicated in  FIG. 3  at  180 . 
   The preferred application of these embodiments is in a 0.35 μm mixed mode technology, where the specified length variation of the transistor gates formed from layer  120  in step  13 , ΔL eff , is ±0.05 μm. The inclusion of the ARL allows for these tolerances, which otherwise would likely exceed ±0.15 μm. Since the PEARL is a silicon rich Si x ON y  film, it has poor insulating properties and needs to be kept from between the capacitor plates or from contacting both of them. The specified performance for the capacitors is less than 4 fA/μm 2  of leakage current and less than 50 PPM/N for the voltage coefficient, suitable for the 14 bit analog resolution of the device employing this technique as the preferred embodiment. The inclusion of step  10   a  provides electrical insulation and makes this possible. 
   Another option would be to leave the entire capacitor dielectric layer  160  on the lower electrode and to deposit the PEARL or other ARL onto the capacitor dielectric rather than directly on the underlying layer  130 ; that is, eliminate step  10  and do not introduce step  10   a . Steps  12  and  13  would then define and etch the dielectric along with the lower electrode. This process corresponds to the open squares of  FIGS. 10 and 11  and, as discussed below, shows performance similar to when no PEARL layer is used. Thus, this option allows for the incorporation of a PEARL layer while maintaining capacitor performance: However, this would not allow the capacitor formation subprocess to be integrated into the fabrication process without a modification of process parameters and the consequent reformulation difficulties, as well as adding variation to the manufacturing steps required. For example, using the values of preferred embodiment, the transistor gate photolithographic process would need to be optimized, as the preferred non-capacitor process PEARL thickness of approximately 375 Å is insufficient to achieve the preferred L eff  variation with an dielectric layer of approximately 375 Å underneath. To match the described process of 375 Å PEARL with no dielectric would require something on the order of 800 Å PEARL if the 375 Å dielectric layer were left in place. Such reparameterizations result in other process difficulties that would require resolution and necessitate two different process recipes, one for capacitors and one without capacitors. 
   Returning to the process flow of the preferred embodiment, in step  10   a  the structure of  FIG. 3  is subjected to a Rapid Thermal Oxidation (RTO). This involves a short oxidation in an RTO tool to grow to a layer of oxide, preferably 20 Å to 60 Å thick, although this could be increased to 70 Å or 100 Å if the extra thickness did not produce excessive degradation of the photolithographic process. This is performed for 10 s to 60 s at a temperature of from 850° C. to 1050° C., with values in the lower part of the range preferred for minimal impact on transistor performance. The result is shown in  FIG. 4 , where the rapid thermal oxide layer  170  has sealed in the previous structure by filling in the undercut between the capacitor plates  140  and  120 . The RTO layer  170  is left on the lower electrode during the PEARL deposition. The chosen thickness for the RTO layer  170  is a compromise: It needs to be thick enough to fill in the undercut  180 , yet thin enough to not significantly degrade a photolithographic process, particularly in the transistor sector, based on previously determined parameters. At 20 Å to 60 Å, this is roughly an order of magnitude thinner than removed capacitor dielectric  160  and the original setting may still be successfully employed. In other embodiments, this oxide or other dielectric could be formed in a furnace or possibly even deposited with an optional anneal. 
     FIG. 5  shows the PEARL  190  as deposited in step  11 . In the preferred embodiment this layer is 300 Å to 400 Å. At this stage, the standard transistor process flow continues, with steps  12  and  13  defining and etching the lower electrodes, including those of the capacitors as well as the transistor gates. 
   An alternate embodiment is shown in  FIGS. 6–9  and follows the following series of steps: 
   Standard Submicron Core Technology Flow 
   
       
       
         
             1 . Lower electrode formation 
             2 . Lower electrode doping 
             3 . Lower electrode anneal
 
Capacitor Process Module
 
             4 . Capacitor dielectric formation 
             5 . Upper electrode formation 
             6 . Upper electrode doping 
             7 . Upper electrode anneal 
             8 . Photo mask to define upper electrode 
             9 . Upper electrode etch 
         
       
       (delete  10 . Capacitor oxide removal)
         10 ′. Spacer oxide deposition or growth     10 ″. Capacitor dielectric and spacer etch
 
Standard Submicron Core Technology Flow continued
     11 . ARL/PEARL formation     12 . Photo mask to define lower electrode     13 . Lower electrode etch     14 . Poly oxidation for transistor and subsequent steps.
 
Steps  1 – 9  of this embodiment are the same as in the previously described embodiment. The preferred values of the parameters are also the same. This is also true from step  11  onward. The difference is in the deletion of step  10  and, instead of including step  10   a , the inclusion steps  10 ′ and  10 ″.
   
     
     
  
   The purpose and effect of steps  10 ′ and  10 ″ is the same as step  10   a  above, namely to further remove the poorly insulating ARL into the interelectrode region of the capacitor. In this alternate embodiment this is done by preventing this gap from forming, while in the previous embodiment this gap was allowed to form, but subsequently refilled and the PEARL was then electrically isolated. 
     FIG. 6  shows the situation at the end of step  9  and is therefore the same as  FIG. 2 . In step  10 ′ a capacitor spacer insulating layer  175  is formed on this structure as shown in  FIG. 7 . This insulating layer is preferably oxide and may be grown or, preferably, deposited to a thickness of 500 Å to 2000 Å in the preferred embodiment of this variation. 
   In step  10 ″, both this spacer oxide  175  and the original capacitor dielectric  160  are etched back to the lower electrode  120 . The resultant structure is shown in  FIG. 8 . Instead of the undercutting found in  FIG. 3 , a spacer  185 , preferably with a thickness of 500 Å to 2000 Å, now remains on either side of the capacitor. This is composed of the combination of the oxide layer  175  and dielectric layer  160 . In this manner, the interpoly portions of dielectric  160  is protected so that the PEARL may not infiltrate into this region while at the same time the dielectric layers  175  and  160  are no longer in the transistor sector. 
     FIG. 9  shows the result of step  11  in this embodiment after the PEARL deposition. The remaining process steps are now the same as in the previously described embodiment or, equivalently at this stage, the standard non-capacitor flow. 
   Either of these embodiments substantially improves the performance of the capacitors, as shown in  FIGS. 10 and 11 .  FIG. 10  shows cumulative probability vs. capacitor dielectric leakage current at 5 volts, where the horizontal scale is logarithmic in units of fA/μm 2 , and  FIG. 11  is a plot of cumulative probability vs. capacitor voltage coefficient PPM/volt. The graph has five series of points: the circles correspond to the described embodiments, the open circle the preferred embodiment using the RTO process of step  10   a  and the solid circle the alternative embodiment with the spacer of steps  10 ′ and  10 ″. 
   As described in the background section, the solid squares correspond to the prior art, while the solid diamonds are for reference and correspond to the desired result. The solid diamonds show leakage levels when the capacitor layer is etched and the problematical PEARL layer is absent, corresponding to the process through step  10 , and produce a near vertical line at a value of approximately 10 −15 ≈0.03 fA/μm 2 , well below the design objective. As discussed in the background section, this process is not preferred since the PEARL layer used in the deep submicron region is lacking. The values for the prior art (solid squares) lie well to the right of these reference values. This is a consequence of the degradation of the interpoly dielectric from the PEARL. Even when undercutting of the capacitor dielectric, indicated at  180  in  FIG. 3 , is small, if the ARL has poor insulating properties, such as for the preferred PEARL layer, leakage between upper and lower electrodes can occur. The preferred embodiment (open circles) differs very little from the reference values, producing quite vertical lines at nearly the same values in both  FIGS. 10 and 11 . The alternative embodiment&#39;s values (closed circles) do not coincide as well, but still show improvement compared to the prior art. 
   The open squares show the process omitting step  10  and removing the dielectric as part of the lower electrode etch. This alternative embodiment mentioned above corresponds to leaving the capacitor dielectric on the lower electrode and to depositing the ARL onto the dielectric rather than directly on the underlying layer. The results for this method are very close to those where the ARL is missing, with the points of the open squares nearly coinciding with those of the solid diamonds. Thus, one way to still maintain capacitor performance would be to omit step  10  without including any additional steps. However, as discussed above, this option would not allow the capacitor formation subprocess to be integrated into the fabrication process without a modification of process parameters and the consequent reformulation difficulties, as well as adding variation to the manufacturing steps required. The capacitor process module of steps  4 – 10  could no longer be included or excluded as needed without also altering the other portions of the process, particularly steps  11 ,  12 , and  13  which immediately follow. However, for applications that do not require the capacitor formation process to be integrated into a CMOS process, or that would allow the initial parameter formulation based upon it, this alternative embodiment would then become the preferred embodiment. 
   Finally, it should be noted that although this discussion has been in terms of an integrated capacitor/CMOS process flow using ARLs, the invention is of wider applicability. The focus here has been on ARLs due to their increasing importance, but a process using another poorly insulating layer at the corresponding process step would similarly benefit. Similarly, whether involving an ARL or other non-insulator, these techniques could improve capacitor production even when not integrated into a CMOS process, particularly those of the embodiment of the previous paragraph. 
   Various details of the implementation and method are merely illustrative of the invention. It will be understood that various changes in such details may be within the scope of the invention, which is to be limited only by the appended claims.