Santali to English:
ᱯᱳᱭᱞᱳ ᱟᱹᱯᱤᱞ ᱠᱟᱪᱷᱟᱦᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱴᱨᱟᱭᱟᱞ ᱠᱳᱴ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱤᱥᱩ ᱱᱚᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱚᱨᱡᱚᱭ ᱩᱞᱴᱟᱹᱣ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ ᱑ ᱟᱨ ᱔ ᱟᱨ ᱮ ᱥᱟᱵ ᱠᱮᱫᱟ ᱡᱮ ᱯᱳᱭᱞᱳ ᱛᱮᱞᱟ ᱮᱢᱚᱜᱤᱡ ᱦᱚᱛᱮᱛᱮ ᱮᱢ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱔ ᱢᱟᱢᱞᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱡᱚᱛᱷᱟᱛ ᱟᱹᱭᱫᱟᱹᱨᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱵᱮᱜᱚᱨ ᱧᱮᱞᱥᱟᱢᱴᱟᱣ ᱡᱳᱜᱢᱟᱱ ᱛᱟᱸᱦᱮᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱪᱮᱫᱟᱜ ᱥᱮ ᱩᱱᱤᱫᱚ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱚᱱᱩᱯᱨᱚᱵᱮᱥᱠᱟᱨᱤᱭ ᱛᱟᱸᱦᱮᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱑᱙᱗᱑ ᱟᱹᱱ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱭᱛᱮ ᱪᱟᱞᱟᱜ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱵᱚᱥᱛᱤ ᱴᱚᱴᱷᱟ ᱜᱚᱵᱚᱞᱨᱮ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱚᱱᱩᱯᱨᱚᱵᱮᱥᱠᱟᱨᱤ ᱨᱮ ᱪᱷᱟᱹᱲ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱡᱚᱛᱷᱟᱛ ᱟᱹᱭᱫᱟᱹᱨᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱞᱟᱹᱠᱛᱤ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱛᱟᱸᱦᱮᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾
The first appellate court reversed the findings of the trial court on issue nos. 1 and 4 and held that the 4 suits filed by the first respondent were maintainable without the permission of the Competent Authority as she was a trespasser and in the case of a trespasser in occupation of a slum area governed by the 1971 Act, the permission of the Competent Authority was not necessary.