"No," Pakhet agrees. "It could mean anything. I think that’s part of the point. Information so densely specific that it becomes poetic and allusory. Obfuscation as indoctrination. What you puzzle out for yourself you must by definition incorporate into who you are even if you reject it. She’s forcing us to see the world through her eyes in order to understand what she says. It’s scientifically demonstrable these days, but the Frankfurt School were doing it instinctively in the 1940s—though they went all out on being infuriating and somewhat less on being poetic. Get down on your knees and cry God for Baudrillard. It takes a Frenchman, evidently, to demand that if it must be whimsical and impenetrable, it should also be enjoyable. But you can see why everyone gets so excited about her."