Consider the following table.

Table:
| outcome     | date           | championship                                       | surface   | opponent in the final   | score in the final    |
|:------------|:---------------|:---------------------------------------------------|:----------|:------------------------|:----------------------|
| winner      | 26 july 2009   | gastein ladies , bad gastein , austria             | clay      | ioana raluca olaru      | 6 - 2 , 6 - 3         |
| runner - up | 19 june 2010   | unicef open , 's - hertogenbosch , netherlands     | grass     | justine henin           | 6 - 3 , 3 - 6 , 4 - 6 |
| runner - up | 8 january 2011 | brisbane international , brisbane , australia      | hard      | petra kvitová           | 1 - 6 , 3 - 6         |
| winner      | 21 may 2011    | internationaux de strasbourg , strasbourg , france | clay      | marion bartoli          | 6 - 4 , 1 - 0 , ret   |
| runner - up | 9 october 2011 | china open , beijing , china                       | hard      | agnieszka radwańska     | 5 - 7 , 6 - 0 , 4 - 6 |
| runner - up | 15 june 2013   | nürnberger versicherungscup , nuremberg , germany  | clay      | simona halep            | 3 - 6 , 3 - 6         |
| runner - up | 04 august 2013 | citi open , washington dc , usa                    | hard      | magdaléna rybáriková    | 4 - 6 , 6 - 7 (2 - 7) |

Table Caption: andrea petkovic

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the nürnberger versicherungscup , nuremberg , germany championship be before the gastein ladies , bad gastein , austria championship

Answer: 0