Consider the following table.

Table:
| locomotive   | serial no   | entered service   | gauge    | livery                         |
|:-------------|:------------|:------------------|:---------|:-------------------------------|
| bl26         | 83 - 1010   | march 1983        | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl27         | 83 - 1011   | august 1983       | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl28         | 83 - 1012   | september 1983    | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl29         | 83 - 1013   | october 1983      | broad    | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl30         | 83 - 1014   | december 1983     | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl31         | 83 - 1015   | november 1983     | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl32         | 83 - 1016   | february 1984     | broad    | national rail orange & grey    |
| bl33         | 83 - 1017   | april 1984        | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl34         | 83 - 1018   | june 1984         | broad    | pacific national blue & yellow |
| bl35         | 83 - 1019   | july 1984         | standard | pacific national blue & yellow |

Table Caption: australian national bl class

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the locomotive with a broad gauge and a serial number of 83 - 1018 enter service before 1984

Answer: 0