Consider the following table.

Table:
| home team       | home team score   | away team       | away team score   | venue         |   crowd | date         |
|:----------------|:------------------|:----------------|:------------------|:--------------|--------:|:-------------|
| geelong         | 13.6 (84)         | north melbourne | 4.3 (27)          | kardinia park |   21555 | 28 june 1980 |
| footscray       | 10.13 (73)        | melbourne       | 6.7 (43)          | western oval  |   11785 | 28 june 1980 |
| hawthorn        | 21.17 (143)       | fitzroy         | 8.7 (55)          | princes park  |    8209 | 28 june 1980 |
| richmond        | 9.19 (73)         | collingwood     | 7.22 (64)         | mcg           |   64054 | 28 june 1980 |
| south melbourne | 5.9 (39)          | carlton         | 10.18 (78)        | lake oval     |   12362 | 28 june 1980 |
| st kilda        | 7.11 (53)         | essendon        | 6.12 (48)         | vfl park      |   20485 | 28 june 1980 |

Table Caption: 1980 vfl season

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: vfl park and lake oval venue be rank among the top 3 crowd venue

Answer: 0