Consider the following table.

Table:
| date              | tournament                 | surface   | opponent in the final   | score                     |
|:------------------|:---------------------------|:----------|:------------------------|:--------------------------|
| 2 june 2003       | surbiton , great britain   | grass     | wesley moodie           | 4 - 6 , 7 - 6 (2) , 1 - 6 |
| 26 april 2004     | glasgow , great britain f1 | carpet    | gaël monfils            | 4 - 6 , 3 - 6             |
| 5 july 2004       | nottingham , great britain | grass     | jo - wilfried tsonga    | 3 - 6 , 4 - 6             |
| 2 october 2006    | mons , belgium             | hard      | janko tipsarević        | 4 - 6 , 6 - 1 , 2 - 6     |
| 16 april 2007     | cardiff , great britain    | hard      | frédéric niemeyer       | 4 - 6 , 5 - 7             |
| 4 april 2011      | little rock , ar , usa f9  | hard      | arnau brugués - davi    | 3 - 6 , 1 - 6             |
| 24 september 2012 | irvine , ca , usa f26      | hard      | daniel nguyen           | 5 - 7 , 2 - 6             |
| 8 april 2013      | oklahoma city , usa f9     | hard      | rik de voest            | 3 - 6 , 2 - 6             |

Table Caption: alex bogdanovic

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: rik de voest be alex bogdanovic 's opponent on april 8 2013

Answer: 1