Consider the following table.

Table:
| date        | visitor     | score   | home       | decision   |   attendance | record      |
|:------------|:------------|:--------|:-----------|:-----------|-------------:|:------------|
| february 2  | st louis    | 3 - 4   | detroit    | osgood     |        19384 | 32 - 11 - 7 |
| february 4  | phoenix     | 4 - 5   | detroit    | osgood     |        19821 | 33 - 11 - 7 |
| february 7  | edmonton    | 3 - 8   | detroit    | conklin    |        20066 | 34 - 11 - 7 |
| february 8  | detroit     | 3 - 0   | pittsburgh | conklin    |        17132 | 35 - 11 - 7 |
| february 10 | detroit     | 5 - 3   | nashville  | conklin    |        15077 | 36 - 11 - 7 |
| february 12 | minnesota   | 2 - 4   | detroit    | osgood     |        20066 | 37 - 11 - 7 |
| february 13 | detroit     | 2 - 3   | columbus   | osgood     |        18802 | 37 - 12 - 7 |
| february 15 | colorado    | 6 - 5   | detroit    | osgood     |        20066 | 37 - 12 - 8 |
| february 18 | nashville   | 2 - 6   | detroit    | conklin    |        20066 | 38 - 12 - 8 |
| february 20 | anaheim     | 2 - 5   | detroit    | conklin    |        20066 | 39 - 12 - 8 |
| february 21 | detroit     | 2 - 5   | minnesota  | howard     |        18568 | 39 - 13 - 8 |
| february 25 | san jose    | 1 - 4   | detroit    | conklin    |        20066 | 40 - 13 - 8 |
| february 27 | los angeles | 1 - 2   | detroit    | osgood     |        20066 | 41 - 13 - 8 |
| february 28 | detroit     | 0 - 8   | nashville  | conklin    |        17113 | 41 - 14 - 8 |

Table Caption: 2008 - 09 detroit red wings season

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the detroit red wing earn their highest score of the season in their game against edmonton on february 7 , 2009