Consider the following table.

Table:
| official name   | status   |   area km 2 |   population | census ranking   |
|:----------------|:---------|------------:|-------------:|:-----------------|
| wakefield       | parish   |      196.42 |         2703 | 1079 of 5008     |
| kent            | parish   |      839.79 |         2361 | 1184 of 5008     |
| woodstock       | parish   |      197.45 |         2148 | 1258 of 5008     |
| brighton        | parish   |      508.3  |         1834 | 1402 of 5008     |
| wicklow         | parish   |      195.5  |         1753 | 1441 of 5008     |
| northampton     | parish   |      243.31 |         1599 | 1537 of 5008     |
| richmond        | parish   |      258.82 |         1414 | 1666 of 5008     |
| peel            | parish   |      113.12 |         1257 | 1779 of 5008     |
| wilmot          | parish   |      191.43 |         1143 | 1888 of 5008     |
| aberdeen        | parish   |      447.91 |          959 | 2105 of 5008     |
| simonds         | parish   |       75.54 |          489 | 3044 of 5008     |

Table Caption: carleton county , new brunswick

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: 1184 of 5008 , 1402 of 5008 , 1666 of 5008 , and 2105 of 5008 be the census ranking for the parish with an area smaller than 200 square km

Answer: 0