Consider the following table.

Table:
| player            |   car |   yards |   avg |   long |
|:------------------|------:|--------:|------:|-------:|
| dane krager       |    59 |     197 |   3.3 |     24 |
| kevin nickerson   |    29 |      73 |   2.5 |      9 |
| torrance marshall |    18 |      69 |   3.8 |     12 |
| henry bryant      |    21 |      49 |   2.3 |     14 |
| john fitzgerald   |    21 |      42 |   2   |     10 |
| sedrick robinson  |     9 |      26 |   2.9 |      8 |
| chance mock       |     7 |      12 |   1.7 |      4 |
| donvetis franklin |     1 |       3 |   3   |      3 |
| darrin chiaverini |     1 |       2 |   2   |      2 |
| fred coleman      |     7 |       0 |   0   |      3 |
| greg brown        |     2 |       2 |   1   |      0 |

Table Caption: none

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: dane krager have the lowest long with 59 car