Consider the following table.

Table:
| district    |   s barangay |   population (2010 census) |   area ( has ) |   pop density (per km2) |
|:------------|-------------:|---------------------------:|---------------:|------------------------:|
| binondo     |           10 |                      12985 |          66.11 |                 19641.5 |
| ermita      |           13 |                       7143 |         158.91 |                  4495   |
| intramuros  |            5 |                       4925 |          67.26 |                  7322.3 |
| malate      |           57 |                      77513 |         259.58 |                 29860.9 |
| paco        |           43 |                      70978 |         278.69 |                 25468.4 |
| pandacan    |           38 |                      73895 |         166    |                 44515.1 |
| port area   |            5 |                      57405 |         315.28 |                 18207.6 |
| quiapo      |           16 |                      24886 |          84.69 |                 29384.8 |
| sampaloc    |          192 |                     241528 |         513.71 |                 47016.4 |
| san andrãs  |           65 |                     115942 |         168.02 |                 69004.9 |
| san miguel  |           12 |                      15992 |          91.37 |                 17502.5 |
| san nicolas |           15 |                      44241 |         163.85 |                 27000.9 |
| santa ana   |           34 |                      60952 |         169.42 |                 35976.9 |
| santa cruz  |           82 |                     115747 |         309.01 |                 37457.4 |
| santa mesa  |           51 |                      99933 |         261.01 |                 38287   |

Table Caption: manila

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: 12985 be the population (2010 census) if the area be 66.11 and more than 19641.5 be the pop density (per km2)

Answer: 0