Consider the following table.

Table:
|   order | episode             | us air date      |   rating |   share | rating / share (1849)   |   viewers (millions) |   rank (timeslot) |
|--------:|:--------------------|:-----------------|---------:|--------:|:------------------------|---------------------:|------------------:|
|       1 | a modest proposal   | august 3 , 2010  |      0.7 |       1 | 0.4 / 1                 |                1.01  |                 5 |
|       2 | no strings attached | august 3 , 2010  |      0.6 |       1 | 0.3 / 1                 |                0.862 |                 5 |
|       3 | it 's my party      | august 10 , 2010 |      0.6 |       1 | 0.3 / 1                 |                0.747 |                 5 |
|       4 | detour              | august 10 , 2010 |      0.5 |       1 | 0.3 / 1                 |                0.776 |                 5 |
|       5 | baby got bank       | august 17 , 2010 |      0.5 |       1 | 0.3 / 1                 |                0.802 |                 5 |

Table Caption: 18 to life

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the episode detour be show before the episode baby got bank , but after the episode a modest proposal

Answer: 1