Consider the following table.

Table:
| constituency number   | name    | reserved for ( sc / st / none)   | district   |   number of electorates (2009) |
|:----------------------|:--------|:---------------------------------|:-----------|-------------------------------:|
| 9                     | ater    | none                             | bhind      |                         177334 |
| 10                    | bhind   | none                             | bhind      |                         197183 |
| 11                    | lahar   | none                             | bhind      |                         205839 |
| 12                    | mehgaon | none                             | bhind      |                         210649 |
| 13                    | gohad   | sc                               | bhind      |                         166893 |
| 20                    | sewda   | none                             | datia      |                         130161 |
| 21                    | bhander | sc                               | datia      |                         139600 |
| 22                    | datia   | none                             | datia      |                         143593 |
| total :               | total : | total :                          | total :    |                        1371252 |

Table Caption: bhind (lok sabha constituency)

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: sewda have the lowest number of electorate in 2009

Answer: 1