Consider the following table.

Table:
| name                     | period                              |   managed |   drawn |   lost | win %   |
|:-------------------------|:------------------------------------|----------:|--------:|-------:|:--------|
| pierre littbarski        | feb 2005 - june 2006                |        24 |       7 |      5 | 50%     |
| terry butcher            | july 2006 - february 2007           |        23 |       8 |      6 | 39%     |
| branko culina            | april 2007 - october 2007           |         9 |       3 |      4 | 22%     |
| john kosmina             | october 2007 - march 2009           |        35 |      11 |     11 | 37%     |
| vítězslav lavička        | february 2009 - may 2012            |        89 |      22 |     32 | 39%     |
| ian crook                | may 2012 - 11 november 2012         |         6 |       0 |      4 | 33%     |
| steve corica (caretaker) | 12 november 2012 - 27 november 2012 |         2 |       0 |      2 | 0%      |
| frank farina             | 28 november 2012 - present          |        13 |       4 |      7 | 35%     |

Table Caption: sydney fc

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: no match be lost when the number of match manage be over 2 during the period from may 2012 - 11 november 2012

Answer: 0