Consider the following table.

Table:
| home team       | home team score   | away team       | away team score   | venue             |   crowd | date         |
|:----------------|:------------------|:----------------|:------------------|:------------------|--------:|:-------------|
| north melbourne | 28.17 (185)       | south melbourne | 12.7 (79)         | arden street oval |    9016 | 22 june 1974 |
| hawthorn        | 19.17 (131)       | richmond        | 15.18 (108)       | princes park      |   15710 | 22 june 1974 |
| fitzroy         | 13.14 (92)        | st kilda        | 12.15 (87)        | junction oval     |   12519 | 22 june 1974 |
| essendon        | 13.12 (90)        | collingwood     | 19.9 (123)        | windy hill        |   25867 | 22 june 1974 |
| melbourne       | 11.13 (79)        | carlton         | 15.18 (108)       | mcg               |   23336 | 22 june 1974 |
| geelong         | 13.14 (92)        | footscray       | 8.10 (58)         | vfl park          |   16320 | 22 june 1974 |

Table Caption: 1974 vfl season

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: mcg venue have 2 time the crowd of windy hill

Answer: 0