Consider the following table.

Table:
| home team   | home team score   | away team       | away team score   | venue                 |   crowd | date          |
|:------------|:------------------|:----------------|:------------------|:----------------------|--------:|:--------------|
| geelong     | 15.14 (104)       | south melbourne | 9.12 (66)         | kardinia park         |   20976 | 16 april 1955 |
| fitzroy     | 13.15 (93)        | hawthorn        | 7.16 (58)         | brunswick street oval |   16000 | 16 april 1955 |
| collingwood | 6.12 (48)         | footscray       | 15.14 (104)       | victoria park         |   33398 | 16 april 1955 |
| carlton     | 19.20 (134)       | north melbourne | 10.5 (65)         | princes park          |   25041 | 16 april 1955 |
| st kilda    | 8.11 (59)         | melbourne       | 17.16 (118)       | junction oval         |   20000 | 16 april 1955 |
| richmond    | 9.23 (77)         | essendon        | 13.16 (94)        | punt road oval        |   30000 | 16 april 1955 |

Table Caption: 1955 vfl season

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: hawthorn , footscray , essendon , melbourne , north melbourne and south melbourne be all away team

Answer: 1