Consider the following table.

Table:
| name                                  | class   | hometown          | boarded   | position                  |
|:--------------------------------------|:--------|:------------------|:----------|:--------------------------|
| andrews , mr thomas                   | first   | belfast , ireland | belfast   | shipbuilder               |
| campbell , mr william henry           | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | joiner                    |
| chisholm , mr roderick robert crispin | first   | belfast , ireland | belfast   | draughtsman               |
| cunningham , mr alfred fleming        | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | fitter                    |
| frost , mr anthony wood artie         | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | fitter                    |
| knight , mr robert j                  | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | fitter                    |
| parkes , mr francis frank             | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | plumber                   |
| parr , mr william henry marsh         | first   | belfast , ireland | belfast   | electrician               |
| watson , mr ennis hastings            | second  | belfast , ireland | belfast   | electrician 's apprentice |

Table Caption: crew of the rms titanic

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: mr thomas andrew , mr roderick robert crispin chisholm , and mr william henry marsh parr , all board first class from belfast