Consider the following table.

Table:
| outcome     |   year | pro slam championship   | surface   | opponent in the final   | score in the final                     |
|:------------|-------:|:------------------------|:----------|:------------------------|:---------------------------------------|
| runner - up |   1942 | us pro                  | grass     | don budge               | 2 - 6 , 2 - 6 , 2 - 6                  |
| winner      |   1946 | us pro                  | grass     | don budge               | 6 - 3 , 6 - 1 , 6 - 1                  |
| winner      |   1947 | us pro                  | grass     | don budge               | 3 - 6 , 6 - 3 , 10 - 8 , 4 - 6 , 6 - 3 |
| runner - up |   1948 | us pro                  | grass     | jack kramer             | 12 - 14 , 2 - 6 , 6 - 3 , 3 - 6        |
| runner - up |   1949 | wembley pro             | indoor    | jack kramer             | 6 - 2 , 4 - 6 , 3 - 6 , 4 - 6          |
| winner      |   1949 | us pro                  | grass     | don budge               | 9 - 7 , 3 - 6 , 6 - 3 , 7 - 5          |

Table Caption: bobby riggs

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: don budge be the most frequent person to be the opponent in the final

Answer: 1