Consider the following table.

Table:
| period   | team   | goal                          | time   | score     |
|:---------|:-------|:------------------------------|:-------|:----------|
| 1st      | met    | denis platonov (1)            | 1:28   | 0 - 1 met |
| 1st      | met    | vladimir malenkikh (1) ( pp ) | 18:27  | 0 - 2 met |
| 2nd      | met    | nikolai zavarukhin (1)        | 30:20  | 0 - 3 met |
| 2nd      | nyr    | chris drury (1) ( pp )        | 39:37  | 1 - 3 nyr |
| 3rd      | nyr    | dan fritsche (1)              | 45:45  | 2 - 3 nyr |
| 3rd      | nyr    | chris drury (2) (pp)          | 50:13  | 3 - 3 nyr |
| 3rd      | nyr    | ryan callahan (1)             | 59:40  | 4 - 3 nyr |

Table Caption: 2008 victoria cup

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the goal by chris drury (1) ( pp ) be in the 3rd period , for the time of 52:18

Answer: 0