Consider the following table.

Table:
| home team       | home team score   | away team   | away team score   | venue             |   crowd | date        |
|:----------------|:------------------|:------------|:------------------|:------------------|--------:|:------------|
| north melbourne | 9.14 (68)         | st kilda    | 11.16 (82)        | arden street oval |   13000 | 3 june 1961 |
| hawthorn        | 10.13 (73)        | richmond    | 8.12 (60)         | glenferrie oval   |   15000 | 3 june 1961 |
| collingwood     | 18.11 (119)       | essendon    | 8.10 (58)         | victoria park     |   28290 | 3 june 1961 |
| geelong         | 13.13 (91)        | footscray   | 4.14 (38)         | kardinia park     |   18683 | 3 june 1961 |
| south melbourne | 7.8 (50)          | fitzroy     | 17.15 (117)       | lake oval         |   14500 | 3 june 1961 |
| melbourne       | 15.14 (104)       | carlton     | 11.13 (79)        | mcg               |   49678 | 3 june 1961 |

Table Caption: 1961 vfl season

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: kardinia park be 1 of the 4 venue that be put to use on 3 june 1961