Consider the following table.

Table:
|   volume |   discs |   episodes | region 1            | region 2           | region 4        |
|---------:|--------:|-----------:|:--------------------|:-------------------|:----------------|
|        1 |       1 |          4 | january 31 , 2006   | february 19 , 2007 | march 15 , 2007 |
|        2 |       1 |          4 | march 28 , 2006     | june 4 , 2007      | july 5 , 2007   |
|        3 |       1 |          4 | may 30 , 2006       | september 3 , 2007 | march 13 , 2008 |
|        4 |       1 |          4 | july 18 , 2006      | february 18 , 2008 | june 19 , 2008  |
|        5 |       1 |          4 | september 19 , 2006 | may 26 , 2008      | march 5 , 2009  |

Table Caption: none

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the volume that have 1 disc , 4 episode , and a region 1 of may 30 , 2006 be volume 5

Answer: 0