Consider the following table.

Table:
|   year | theme                         | artist          | composition                |   mintage |   issue price |
|-------:|:------------------------------|:----------------|:---------------------------|----------:|--------------:|
|   2007 | blue crystal - piedfort       | konrad wachelko | 92.5% silver , 7.5% copper |      5000 |         94.95 |
|   2007 | iridescent crystal - piedfort | konrad wachelko | 92.5% silver , 7.5% copper |      5000 |         94.95 |
|   2008 | amethyst crystal              | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         94.95 |
|   2008 | sapphire crystal              | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         94.95 |
|   2009 | blue crystal                  | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         94.95 |
|   2009 | pink crystal                  | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         94.95 |
|   2010 | blue crystal                  | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         99.95 |
|   2010 | tanzanite crystal             | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |      7500 |         99.95 |
|   2011 | emerald crystal               | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |     15000 |        114.95 |
|   2011 | topaz crystal                 | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |     15000 |        114.95 |
|   2011 | hyacinth red small crystal    | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |     15000 |        114.95 |
|   2011 | montana blue small crystal    | konrad wachelko | 99.99% silver              |     15000 |        114.95 |

Table Caption: royal canadian mint numismatic coins (2000s)

Is the following statement entailed (=1) or refuted (=0) by the table?

Statement: the 2008 theme be the amethyst with an issue price of 94.95