Date: 2006-06-28
Speaker: BILL KELLER (republican)
Chamber: S

Managing Editor. The New York Times. West 43rd Street. New York. NY. DEAR MR. KELLER: The New York Times decision to disclose the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program. a robust and classified effort to map terrorist networks through the use of financial data. was irresponsible and harmful to the security of Americans and freedomloving people worldwide. In choosing to expose this program. despite repeated pleas from highlevel officials on both sides of the aisle. including myself. the Times undermined a highly successful counterterrorism program and alerted terrorists to the methods and sources used to track their money trails. Your charge that our efforts to convince The New York Times not to publish were "halfhearted" is incorrect and offensive. Nothing could be further from the truth. Over the past two months. Treasury has engaged in a vigorous dialogue with the Times--from the reporters writing the story to the D.C. Bureau Chief and all the way up to you. It should also be noted that the cochairmen of the bipartisan 911 Commission. Governor Tom Kean and Congressman Lee Hamilton. met in person or placed calls to the very highest levels of the Times urging the paper not to publish the story. Members of Congress. senior U.S. Government officials and wellrespected legal authorities from both sides of the aisle also asked the paper not to publish or supported the legality and validity of the program. Indeed. I invited you to my office for the explicit purpose of talking you out of publishing this story. And there was nothing "halfhearted" about that effort I told you about the true value of the program in defeating terrorism and sought to impress upon you the harm that would occur from its disclosure. I stressed that the program is grounded on solid legal footing. had many builtin safeguards. and has been extremely valuable in the war against terror. Additionally. Treasury Under Secretary Stuart Levey met with the reporters and yopr senior editors to answer countless questions. laying out the legal framework and diligently outlining the multiple safeguards and protections that are in place. You have defended your decision to compromise this program by asserting that "terror financiers know" our methods for tracking their funds and have already moved to other methods to send money. The fact that your editors believe themselves to be qualified to assess how terrorists are moving money betrays a breathtaking arrogance and a deep misunderstanding of this program and how it works. While terrorists are relying more heavily than before on cumbersome methods to move money. such as cash couriers. we have continued to see them using the formal financial system. which has made this particular program incredibly valuable. Lastly. justifying this disclosure by citing. the "public interest" in knowing Information about this program means the paper has given itself free license to expose any covert activity that it happens to learn ofeven those that are legally grounded. responsibly administered. independently overseen. and highly effective. Indeed. you have done so here. What youve seemed to overlook is that it is also a matter of public interest that we use all means availablelawfully and responsiblyto help protect the American people from the deadly threats of terrorists. I am deeply disappointed in the New York Times. Sincerely.