Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
PL 111-383 (H.R.6523), enacted 01/07/2011

124 STAT. 4137 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Public Law 111–383 
111th Congress 
An Act 
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for military activities of the Depart-
ment of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Depart-
ment of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, 
and for other purposes. 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 
(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ike Skelton 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’’. 
(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in this or any other Act to 
the ‘‘National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’’ shall 
be deemed to refer to the ‘‘Ike Skelton National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2011’’. 
SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into three divisions as 
follows: 
(1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. 
(2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. 
(3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security 
Authorizations and Other Authorizations. 
(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act 
is as follows: 
Sec. 1. Short title. 
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. 
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. 
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 101. Army. 
Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. 
Sec. 103. Air Force. 
Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. 
Subtitle B—Navy Programs 
Sec. 111. Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA Replacement 
ship designated LHA–7. 
Sec. 112. Requirement to maintain Navy airborne signals intelligence, surveillance, 
and reconnaissance capabilities. 
Sec. 113. Report on naval force structure and missile defense. 
Sec. 114. Reports on service-life extension of F/A–18 aircraft by the Department of 
the Navy. 
Subtitle C—Joint and Multiservice Matters 
Sec. 121. Limitations on biometric systems funds. 
5 USC 9902 note. 
Ike Skelton 
National Defense 
Authorization 
Act for Fiscal 
Year 2011. 
Jan. 7, 2011 
[H.R. 6523] 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00683
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4138 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 122. System management plan and matrix for the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter 
aircraft program. 
Sec. 123. Quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirements funds. 
Sec. 124. Counter-improvised explosive device initiatives database. 
Sec. 125. Study on lightweight body armor solutions. 
Sec. 126. Integration of solid state laser systems into certain aircraft. 
Sec. 127. Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capacities. 
TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 
Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 211. Enhancement of Department of Defense support of science, mathematics, 
and engineering education. 
Sec. 212. Limitation on use of funds by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agen-
cy for operation of National Cyber Range. 
Sec. 213. Separate program elements required for research and development of 
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. 
Sec. 214. Program for research, development, and deployment of advanced ground 
vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components. 
Sec. 215. Demonstration and pilot projects on cybersecurity. 
Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 
Sec. 221. Sense of Congress on ballistic missile defense. 
Sec. 222. Repeal of prohibition of certain contracts by Missile Defense Agency with 
foreign entities. 
Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for missile defense interceptors in Eu-
rope. 
Sec. 224. Medium Extended Air Defense System. 
Sec. 225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. 
Sec. 226. Authority to support ballistic missile shared early warning with the 
Czech Republic. 
Sec. 227. Report on phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. 
Sec. 228. Independent review and assessment of the Ground-Based Midcourse De-
fense system. 
Sec. 229. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. 
Subtitle D—Reports 
Sec. 231. Report on analysis of alternatives and program requirements for the 
Ground Combat Vehicle program. 
Sec. 232. Cost benefit analysis of future tank-fired munitions. 
Sec. 233. Annual Comptroller General report on the VH–(XX) presidential heli-
copter acquisition program. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress affirming the importance of Department of Defense 
participation in development of next generation semiconductor tech-
nologies. 
Sec. 242. Pilot program on collaborative energy security. 
Sec. 243. Pilot program to include technology protection features during research 
and development of defense systems. 
TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 
Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 
Sec. 311. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in 
connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. 
Sec. 312. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in 
connection with Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. 
Sec. 313. Requirements related to the investigation of exposure to drinking water 
at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 
Sec. 314. Comptroller General assessment on military environmental exposures. 
Subtitle C—Workplace and Depot Issues 
Sec. 321. Technical amendments to requirement for service contract inventory. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00684
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4139 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 322. Repeal of conditions on expansion of functions performed under prime 
vendor contracts for depot-level maintenance and repair. 
Sec. 323. Prohibition on establishing goals or quotas for conversion of functions to 
performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 
Subtitle D—Reports 
Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to corrosion prevention 
projects and activities. 
Sec. 332. Modification and repeal of certain reporting requirements. 
Sec. 333. Report on Air Sovereignty Alert mission. 
Sec. 334. Report on the SEAD/DEAD mission requirement for the Air Force. 
Sec. 335. Requirement to update study on strategic seaports. 
Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 
Sec. 341. Permanent authority to accept and use landing fees charged for use of do-
mestic military airfields by civil aircraft. 
Sec. 342. Extension of Arsenal Support Program Initiative. 
Sec. 343. Limitation on obligation of funds for the Army Human Terrain System. 
Sec. 344. Limitation on obligation of funds pending submission of classified jus-
tification material. 
Sec. 345. Requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory. 
Sec. 346. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition in excess of military require-
ments. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 351. Expedited processing of background investigations for certain individuals. 
Sec. 352. Revision to authorities relating to transportation of civilian passengers 
and commercial cargoes by Department of Defense when space unavail-
able on commercial lines. 
Sec. 353. Technical correction to obsolete reference relating to use of flexible hiring 
authority to facilitate performance of certain Department of Defense 
functions by civilian employees. 
Sec. 354. Authority for payment of full replacement value for loss or damage to 
household goods in limited cases not covered by carrier liability. 
Sec. 355. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property. 
Sec. 356. Operational readiness models. 
Sec. 357. Sense of Congress regarding continued importance of High-Altitude Avia-
tion Training Site, Colorado. 
Sec. 358. Study of effects of new construction of obstructions on military installa-
tions and operations. 
TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS 
Subtitle A—Active Forces 
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 
Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. 
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. 
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2011 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty 
for operational support. 
Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 421. Military personnel. 
TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 
Sec. 501. Ages for appointment and mandatory retirement for health professions of-
ficers. 
Sec. 502. Authority for appointment of warrant officers in the grade of W–1 by com-
mission and standardization of warrant officer appointing authority. 
Sec. 503. Nondisclosure of information from discussions, deliberations, notes, and 
records of special selection boards. 
Sec. 504. Administrative removal of officers from promotion list. 
Sec. 505. Modification of authority for officers selected for appointment to general 
and flag officer grades to wear insignia of higher grade before appoint-
ment. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00685
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4140 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 506. Temporary authority to reduce minimum length of active service as a 
commissioned officer required for voluntary retirement as an officer. 
Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 
Sec. 511. Removal of statutory distribution limits on Navy reserve flag officer allo-
cation. 
Sec. 512. Assignment of Air Force Reserve military technicians (dual status) to po-
sitions outside Air Force Reserve unit program. 
Sec. 513. Temporary authority for temporary employment of non-dual status mili-
tary technicians. 
Sec. 514. Revision of structure and functions of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. 
Sec. 515. Repeal of requirement for new oath when officer transfers from active- 
duty list to reserve active-status list. 
Sec. 516. Leave of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 517. Direct appointment of graduates of the United States Merchant Marine 
Academy into the National Guard. 
Subtitle C—Joint Qualified Officers and Requirements 
Sec. 521. Technical revisions to definition of joint matters for purposes of joint offi-
cer management. 
Sec. 522. Modification of promotion board procedures for joint qualified officers and 
officers with Joint Staff experience. 
Subtitle D—General Service Authorities 
Sec. 531. Extension of temporary authority to order retired members of the Armed 
Forces to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments. 
Sec. 532. Non-chargeable rest and recuperation absence for certain members under-
going extended deployment to a combat zone. 
Sec. 533. Correction of military records. 
Sec. 534. Disposition of members found to be fit for duty who are not suitable for 
deployment or worldwide assignment for medical reasons. 
Sec. 535. Review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female 
members of the Armed Forces. 
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal Matters 
Sec. 541. Continuation of warrant officers on active duty to complete disciplinary 
action. 
Sec. 542. Enhanced authority to punish contempt in military justice proceedings. 
Sec. 543. Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs. 
Subtitle F—Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration 
Sec. 551. Enhancements of Department of Defense undergraduate nurse training 
program. 
Sec. 552. Repayment of education loan repayment benefits. 
Sec. 553. Participation of Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Finan-
cial Assistance Program recipients in active duty health profession loan 
repayment program. 
Sec. 554. Active duty obligation for military academy graduates who participate in 
the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assist-
ance program. 
Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education 
Sec. 561. Enrollment of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who reside in 
temporary housing in Department of Defense domestic dependent ele-
mentary and secondary schools. 
Sec. 562. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 
dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 
civilian employees. 
Sec. 563. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 
Subtitle H—Decorations and Awards 
Sec. 571. Clarification of persons eligible for award of bronze star medal. 
Sec. 572. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to 
Shinyei Matayoshi for acts of valor during World War II. 
Sec. 573. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to 
Jay C. Copley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 
Sec. 574. Program to commemorate 60th anniversary of the Korean War. 
Subtitle I—Military Family Readiness Matters 
Sec. 581. Appointment of additional members of Department of Defense Military 
Family Readiness Council. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00686
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4141 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 582. Enhancement of community support for military families with special 
needs. 
Sec. 583. Modification of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. 
Sec. 584. Expansion and continuation of Joint Family Support Assistance Program. 
Sec. 585. Report on military spouse education programs. 
Sec. 586. Report on enhancing benefits available for military dependent children 
with special education needs. 
Sec. 587. Reports on child development centers and financial assistance for child 
care for members of the Armed Forces. 
Subtitle J—Other Matters 
Sec. 591. Authority for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 
and Coast Guard civilian employees and their families to accept gifts 
from non-Federal entities. 
Sec. 592. Increase in number of private sector civilians authorized for admission to 
National Defense University. 
Sec. 593. Admission of defense industry civilians to attend United States Air Force 
Institute of Technology. 
Sec. 594. Updated terminology for Army Medical Service Corps. 
Sec. 595. Date for submission of annual report on Department of Defense 
STARBASE Program. 
Sec. 596. Extension of deadline for submission of final report of Military Leader-
ship Diversity Commission. 
TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS 
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 
Sec. 601. Ineligibility of certain Federal civilian employees for Reservist income re-
placement payments on account of availability of comparable benefits 
under another program. 
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for re-
serve forces. 
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 
care professionals. 
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear offi-
cers. 
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 
pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bo-
nuses and special pays. 
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses. 
Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 
Sec. 621. Extension of authority to provide travel and transportation allowances for 
inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances. 
Sec. 622. Travel and transportation allowances for attendance at Yellow Ribbon Re-
integration events. 
Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 
Sec. 631. Elimination of cap on retired pay multiplier for members with greater 
than 30 years of service who retire for disability. 
Sec. 632. Payment date for retired and retainer pay. 
Sec. 633. Clarification of effect of ordering reserve component member to active 
duty to receive authorized medical care on reducing eligibility age for re-
ceipt of non-regular service retired pay. 
Sec. 634. Conformity of special compensation for members with injuries or illnesses 
requiring assistance in everyday living with monthly personal caregiver 
stipend under Department of Veterans Affairs program of comprehen-
sive assistance for family caregivers. 
Sec. 635. Sense of Congress concerning age and service requirements for retired 
pay for non-regular service. 
Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 
Operations 
Sec. 641. Addition of definition of morale, welfare, and recreation telephone serv-
ices for use in contracts to provide such services for military personnel 
serving in combat zones. 
Sec. 642. Feasibility study on establishment of full exchange store in the Northern 
Mariana Islands. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00687
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4142 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 643. Continuation of commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval 
Air Station, Maine. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 651. Report on basic allowance for housing for personnel assigned to sea duty. 
Sec. 652. Report on savings from enhanced management of special pay for aviation 
career officers extending period of active duty. 
TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 
Sec. 701. Extension of prohibition on increases in certain health care costs. 
Sec. 702. Extension of dependent coverage under the TRICARE program. 
Sec. 703. Survivor dental benefits. 
Sec. 704. Aural screenings for members of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 705. Temporary prohibition on increase in copayments under retail pharmacy 
system of pharmacy benefits program. 
Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 
Sec. 711. Administration of TRICARE. 
Sec. 712. Postdeployment health reassessments for purposes of the medical track-
ing system for members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas. 
Sec. 713. Clarification of licensure requirements applicable to military health-care 
professionals who are members of the National Guard performing cer-
tain duty while in State status. 
Sec. 714. Improvements to oversight of medical training for Medical Corps officers. 
Sec. 715. Health information technology. 
Sec. 716. Education and training on use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation pro-
grams for wounded warriors. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
Sec. 721. Repeal of report requirement on separations resulting from refusal to par-
ticipate in anthrax vaccine immunization program. 
Sec. 722. Comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assessments of 
members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. 
Sec. 723. Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder by military occupation. 
Sec. 724. Licensed mental health counselors and the TRICARE program. 
TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 
RELATED MATTERS 
Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 
Sec. 801. Disclosure to litigation support contractors. 
Sec. 802. Designation of engine development and procurement program as major 
subprogram. 
Sec. 803. Enhancement of Department of Defense authority to respond to combat 
and safety emergencies through rapid acquisition and deployment of ur-
gently needed supplies. 
Sec. 804. Review of acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response 
to urgent operational needs. 
Sec. 805. Acquisition of major automated information system programs. 
Sec. 806. Requirements for information relating to supply chain risk. 
Subtitle B—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 
Sec. 811. Cost estimates for program baselines and contract negotiations for major 
defense acquisition and major automated information system programs. 
Sec. 812. Management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition pro-
grams. 
Sec. 813. Modification and extension of requirements of the Weapon System Acqui-
sition Reform Act of 2009. 
Sec. 814. Inclusion of major subprograms to major defense acquisition programs 
under various acquisition-related requirements. 
Subtitle C—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 
Limitations 
Sec. 821. Provisions relating to fire resistant fiber for production of military uni-
forms. 
Sec. 822. Repeal of requirement for certain procurements from firms in the small 
arms production industrial base. 
Sec. 823. Review of regulatory definition relating to production of specialty metals. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00688
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4143 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 824. Guidance relating to rights in technical data. 
Sec. 825. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order 
contracts. 
Sec. 826. Inclusion of option amounts in limitations on authority of the Department 
of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects. 
Sec. 827. Permanent authority for Defense Acquisition Challenge Program; pilot ex-
pansion of Program. 
Sec. 828. Energy savings performance contracts. 
Sec. 829. Definition of materials critical to national security. 
Subtitle D—Contractor Matters 
Sec. 831. Oversight and accountability of contractors performing private security 
functions in areas of combat operations. 
Sec. 832. Extension of regulations on contractors performing private security func-
tions to areas of other significant military operations. 
Sec. 833. Standards and certification for private security contractors. 
Sec. 834. Enhancements of authority of Secretary of Defense to reduce or deny 
award fees to companies found to jeopardize the health or safety of Gov-
ernment personnel. 
Sec. 835. Annual joint report and Comptroller General review on contracting in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 841. Improvements to structure and functioning of Joint Requirements Over-
sight Council. 
Sec. 842. Department of Defense policy on acquisition and performance of sustain-
able products and services. 
Sec. 843. Assessment and plan for critical rare earth materials in defense applica-
tions. 
Sec. 844. Review of national security exception to competition. 
Sec. 845. Requirement for entities with facility clearances that are not under for-
eign ownership control or influence mitigation. 
Sec. 846. Procurement of photovoltaic devices. 
Sec. 847. Non-availability exception from Buy American requirements for procure-
ment of hand or measuring tools. 
Sec. 848. Contractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
Subtitle F—Improve Acquisition Act 
Sec. 860. Short title. 
PART I—DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM 
Sec. 861. Improvements to the management of the defense acquisition system. 
Sec. 862. Comptroller General report on Joint Capabilities Integration and Devel-
opment System. 
Sec. 863. Requirements for the acquisition of services. 
Sec. 864. Review of defense acquisition guidance. 
Sec. 865. Requirement to review references to services acquisition throughout the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement. 
Sec. 866.
Pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental 
items. 
PART II—DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE 
Sec. 871. Acquisition workforce excellence. 
Sec. 872. Amendments to the acquisition workforce demonstration project. 
Sec. 873. Career development for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition 
workforce. 
Sec. 874. Recertification and training requirements. 
Sec. 875. Information technology acquisition workforce. 
Sec. 876. Definition of acquisition workforce. 
Sec. 877. Defense Acquisition University curriculum review. 
PART III—FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 
Sec. 881. Audit readiness of financial statements of the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 882. Review of obligation and expenditure thresholds. 
Sec. 883. Disclosure and traceability of the cost of Department of Defense health 
care contracts. 
PART IV—INDUSTRIAL BASE 
Sec. 891. Expansion of the industrial base. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00689
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4144 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 892. Price trend analysis for supplies and equipment purchased by the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
Sec. 893. Contractor business systems. 
Sec. 894. Review and recommendations on eliminating barriers to contracting with 
the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 895. Inclusion of the providers of services and information technology in the 
national technology and industrial base. 
Sec. 896. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial 
Base Policy; Industrial Base Fund. 
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 
Sec. 901. Reorganization of Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out reduction 
required by law in number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
Sec. 911. Integrated space architectures. 
Sec. 912. Limitation on use of funds for costs of terminating contracts under the 
National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System 
Program. 
Sec. 913. Limitation on use of funds for purchasing Global Positioning System user 
equipment. 
Sec. 914. Plan for integration of space-based nuclear detection sensors. 
Sec. 915. Preservation of the solid rocket motor industrial base. 
Sec. 916. Implementation plan to sustain solid rocket motor industrial base. 
Sec. 917. Review and plan on sustainment of liquid rocket propulsion systems in-
dustrial base. 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 
Sec. 921. Five-year extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in 
commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. 
Sec. 922. Modification of attendees at proceedings of Intelligence, Surveillance, and 
Reconnaissance Integration Council. 
Sec. 923. Report on Department of Defense interservice management and coordina-
tion of remotely piloted aircraft support of intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance. 
Sec. 924. Report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management relating 
to Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance provided by 
remotely piloted aircraft. 
Subtitle D—Cyber Warfare, Cyber Security, and Related Matters 
Sec. 931. Continuous monitoring of Department of Defense information systems for 
cybersecurity. 
Sec. 932. Strategy on computer software assurance. 
Sec. 933. Strategy for acquisition and oversight of Department of Defense cyber 
warfare capabilities. 
Sec. 934. Report on the cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 935. Reports on Department of Defense progress in defending the Department 
and the defense industrial base from cyber events. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 941. Two-year extension of authorities relating to temporary waiver of reim-
bursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at De-
partment of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies. 
Sec. 942. Additional requirements for quadrennial roles and missions review in 
2011. 
Sec. 943. Report on organizational structure and policy guidance of the Department 
of Defense regarding information operations. 
Sec. 944. Report on organizational structures of the geographic combatant com-
mand headquarters. 
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Financial Matters 
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 
Sec. 1002. Authorization of additional appropriations for operations in Afghanistan, 
Iraq, and Haiti for fiscal year 2010. 
Sec. 1003. Budgetary effects of this Act. 
Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 
Sec. 1011. Unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00690
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4145 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1012. Extension and modification of joint task forces support to law enforce-
ment agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 
Sec. 1013. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug 
activities. 
Sec. 1014. Support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 
Sec. 1015. Notice to Congress on military construction projects for facilities of the 
Department of Defense and foreign law enforcement agencies for 
counter-drug activities. 
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 
Sec. 1021. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy 
mess operations. 
Sec. 1022. Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the naming of a naval com-
bat vessel after Father Vincent Capodanno. 
Sec. 1023. Requirements for long-range plan for construction of naval vessels. 
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 
Sec. 1031. Extension of certain authority for making rewards for combating ter-
rorism. 
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 
detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
Sec. 1033. Certification requirements relating to the transfer of individuals de-
tained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries 
and other foreign entities. 
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in the 
United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval 
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
Sec. 1035. Comprehensive review of force protection policies. 
Subtitle E—Homeland Defense and Civil Support 
Sec. 1041. Limitation on deactivation of existing Consequence Management Re-
sponse Forces. 
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports 
Sec. 1051. Interagency national security knowledge and skills. 
Sec. 1052. Report on establishing a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. 
Sec. 1053. Comptroller General report on previously requested reports. 
Sec. 1054. Biennial report on nuclear triad. 
Sec. 1055. Comptroller General study on common alignment of world regions in de-
partments and agencies with international responsibilities. 
Sec. 1056. Required reports concerning bomber modernization, sustainment, and 
recapitalization efforts in support of the national defense strategy. 
Sec. 1057. Comptroller General study and recommendations regarding security of 
southern land border of the United States. 
Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 
Sec. 1061. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law. 
Sec. 1062. Prohibition on infringing on the individual right to lawfully acquire, pos-
sess, own, carry, and otherwise use privately owned firearms, ammuni-
tion, and other weapons. 
Sec. 1063. Development of criteria and methodology for determining the safety and 
security of nuclear weapons. 
Subtitle H—Other Matters 
Sec. 1071. National Defense Panel. 
Sec. 1072. Sale of surplus military equipment to State and local homeland security 
and emergency management agencies. 
Sec. 1073. Defense research and development rapid innovation program. 
Sec. 1074. Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic emer-
gency assistance. 
Sec. 1075. Technical and clerical amendments. 
Sec. 1076. Study on optimal balance of manned and remotely piloted aircraft. 
Sec. 1077. Treatment of successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Free-
dom. 
Sec. 1078. Program to assess the utility of non-lethal weapons. 
Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress on strategic nuclear force reductions. 
TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS 
Sec. 1101. Clarification of authorities at personnel demonstration laboratories. 
Sec. 1102. Requirements for Department of Defense senior mentors. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00691
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4146 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 
pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 
working overseas. 
Sec. 1104. Extension and modification of enhanced Department of Defense appoint-
ment and compensation authority for personnel for care and treatment 
of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 1105. Rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing 
work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear aircraft carrier for-
ward deployed in Japan. 
TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS 
Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 
Sec. 1201. Expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat ter-
rorism. 
Sec. 1202. Addition of allied government agencies to enhanced logistics interoper-
ability authority. 
Sec. 1203. Expansion of temporary authority to use acquisition and cross-servicing 
agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces 
for personnel protection and survivability. 
Sec. 1204. Authority to pay personnel expenses in connection with African coopera-
tion. 
Sec. 1205. Authority to build the capacity of Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter 
Terrorism Forces. 
Sec. 1206. Air Force scholarships for Partnership for Peace nations to participate 
in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program. 
Sec. 1207. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 
the capacity of foreign military forces. 
Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 
Sec. 1211. Limitation on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to Iraq. 
Sec. 1212. One-year extension and modification of Commanders’ Emergency Re-
sponse Program. 
Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 
support provided to United States military operations. 
Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense 
services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1215. No permanent military bases in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1216. Authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure 
projects in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1218. Extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations 
in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1219. Recommendations on oversight of contractors engaged in activities relat-
ing to Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. 
Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 
Sec. 1231. One-year extension of report on progress toward security and stability 
in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1232. Two-year extension of United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan 
National Security Forces. 
Sec. 1233. Modification of report on responsible redeployment of United States 
Armed Forces from Iraq. 
Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense support for coalition operations. 
Sec. 1235. Reports on police training programs. 
Sec. 1236. Report on certain Iraqis affiliated with the United States. 
Sec. 1237. Report on Department of Defense’s plans to reform the export control 
system. 
Sec. 1238. Report on United States efforts to defend against threats posed by the 
anti-access and area-denial capabilities of certain nation-states. 
Sec. 1239. Defense Science Board report on Department of Defense strategy to 
counter violent extremism outside the United States. 
Sec. 1240. Report on merits of an Incidents at Sea agreement between the United 
States, Iran, and certain other countries. 
Sec. 1241. Requirement to monitor and evaluate Department of Defense activities 
to counter violent extremism in Africa. 
Sec. 1242. NATO Special Operations Headquarters. 
Sec. 1243. National Military Strategy to Counter Iran and required briefings. 
TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00692
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4147 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 
Sec. 1303. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 
countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 
Sec. 1304. Plan for nonproliferation, proliferation prevention, and threat reduction 
activities with the People’s Republic of China. 
TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Programs 
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1402. Study on working capital fund cash balances. 
Sec. 1403. Modification of certain working capital fund requirements. 
Sec. 1404. Reduction of unobligated balances within the Pentagon Reservation 
Maintenance Revolving Fund. 
Sec. 1405. National Defense Sealift Fund. 
Sec. 1406. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 
Sec. 1407. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1408. Defense Inspector General. 
Sec. 1409. Defense Health Program. 
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 
Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. 
Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized dis-
posals from the National Defense Stockpile. 
Subtitle C—Chemical Demilitarization Matters 
Sec. 1421. Consolidation and reorganization of statutory authority for destruction 
of United States stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
Sec. 1431. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 
Sec. 1432. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Depart-
ment of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Cap-
tain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 
TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 
Sec. 1501. Purpose. 
Sec. 1502. Army procurement. 
Sec. 1503. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
Sec. 1504. Navy and Marine Corps procurement. 
Sec. 1505. Air Force procurement. 
Sec. 1506. Defense-wide activities procurement. 
Sec. 1507. National Guard and Reserve equipment. 
Sec. 1508. Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund. 
Sec. 1509. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 
Sec. 1510. Operation and maintenance. 
Sec. 1511. Military personnel. 
Sec. 1512. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1513. Defense Health Program. 
Sec. 1514. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1515. Defense Inspector General. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 
Sec. 1531. Limitations on availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces 
Fund. 
Sec. 1532. Limitations on availability of funds in Iraq Security Forces Fund. 
Sec. 1533. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain fa-
cilities projects in Iraq. 
Sec. 1534. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
Sec. 1535. Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan and 
economic transition plan and economic strategy for Afghanistan. 
TITLE XVI—IMPROVED SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE IN 
THE ARMED FORCES 
Sec. 1601. Definition of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and re-
sponse program and other definitions. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00693
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4148 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1602. Comprehensive Department of Defense policy on sexual assault preven-
tion and response program. 
Subtitle A—Organizational Structure and Application of Sexual Assault Prevention 
and Response Program Elements 
Sec. 1611. Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 
Sec. 1612. Oversight and evaluation standards. 
Sec. 1613. Report and plan for completion of acquisition of centralized Department 
of Defense sexual assault database. 
Sec. 1614. Restricted reporting of sexual assaults. 
Subtitle B—Improved and Expanded Availability of Services 
Sec. 1621. Improved protocols for providing medical care for victims of sexual as-
sault. 
Sec. 1622. Sexual assault victims access to Victim Advocate services. 
Subtitle C—Reporting Requirements 
Sec. 1631. Annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the 
Armed Forces and improvement to sexual assault prevention and re-
sponse program. 
Sec. 1632. Additional reports. 
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 
Sec. 2001. Short title. 
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by 
law. 
Sec. 2003. Funding tables. 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2105. Use of unobligated Army military construction funds in conjunction with 
funds provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia to carry out certain 
fiscal year 2002 project. 
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. 
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Technical amendment to reflect multi-increment fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2206. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2007 project. 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Sec. 2404. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 
defense-wide. 
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project. 
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY 
INVESTMENT PROGRAM 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00694
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4149 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 
land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Sec. 2607. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 
TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. 
Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through De-
partment of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2704. Transportation plan for BRAC 133 project under Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
BRAC initiative. 
TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 
Sec. 2801. Availability of military construction information on Internet. 
Sec. 2802. Use of Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for construc-
tion or alteration at Pentagon Reservation. 
Sec. 2803. Reduced reporting time limits for certain military construction and real 
property reports when submitted in electronic media. 
Sec. 2804. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction 
projects inside the United States Central Command area of responsi-
bility. 
Sec. 2805. Sense of Congress and report regarding employment of veterans to work 
on military construction projects. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 
Sec. 2811. Notice-and-wait requirements applicable to real property transactions. 
Sec. 2812. Treatment of proceeds generated from leases of non-excess property in-
volving military museums. 
Sec. 2813. Limitation on enhanced use leases of non-excess property. 
Sec. 2814. Repeal of expired authority to lease land for special operations activities. 
Sec. 2815. Former Naval Bombardment Area, Culebra Island, Puerto Rico. 
Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 
Sec. 2821. Extension of term of Deputy Secretary of Defense’s leadership of Guam 
Oversight Council. 
Sec. 2822. Utility conveyances to support integrated water and wastewater treat-
ment system on Guam. 
Sec. 2823. Report on types of facilities required to support Guam realignment. 
Sec. 2824. Report on civilian infrastructure needs for Guam. 
Subtitle D—Energy Security 
Sec. 2831. Consideration of environmentally sustainable practices in Department 
energy performance plan. 
Sec. 2832. Enhancement of energy security activities of the Department of Defense. 
Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 
Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Whittier, Alaska. 
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, Fort Knox, Kentucky. 
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Naval Support Activity (West Bank), New Orleans, 
Louisiana. 
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, former Navy Extremely Low Frequency communica-
tions project site, Republic, Michigan. 
Sec. 2845. Land conveyance, Marine Forces Reserve Center, Wilmington, North 
Carolina. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 2851. Limitation on availability of funds pending report regarding construction 
of a new outlying landing field in North Carolina and Virginia. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00695
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4150 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 2852. Requirements related to providing world class military medical centers. 
Sec. 2853. Report on fuel infrastructure sustainment, restoration, and moderniza-
tion requirements. 
Sec. 2854. Naming of Armed Forces Reserve Center, Middletown, Connecticut. 
Sec. 2855. Sense of Congress on proposed extension of the Alaska Railroad corridor 
across Federal land in Alaska. 
Sec. 2856. Sense of Congress on improving military housing for members of the Air 
Force. 
Sec. 2857. Sense of Congress regarding recreational hunting and fishing on mili-
tary installations. 
TITLE XXIX—OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition project. 
Sec. 2903. Authorized Defense Wide Construction and Land Acquisition Projects 
and Authorization of Appropriations. 
TITLE XXX—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FUNDING TABLES 
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 
AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 
Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance. 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 3111. Aircraft procurement. 
Sec. 3112. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear secu-
rity complex. 
Sec. 3113. Comptroller General assessment of adequacy of budget requests with re-
spect to the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons 
stockpile. 
Sec. 3114. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects. 
Sec. 3115. Establishment of cooperative research and development centers. 
Sec. 3116. Future-years defense environmental management plan. 
Sec. 3117. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy for appointment of certain 
scientific, engineering, and technical personnel. 
Sec. 3118. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 
to carry out certain research projects. 
Sec. 3119. Extension of authority relating to the International Materials Protection, 
Control, and Accounting Program of the Department of Energy. 
Sec. 3120. Extension of deadline for transfer of parcels of land to be conveyed to 
Los Alamos County, New Mexico, and held in trust for the Pueblo of 
San Ildefonso. 
Sec. 3121. Repeal of sunset provision for modification of minor construction thresh-
old for plant projects. 
Sec. 3122. Enhancing private-sector employment through cooperative research and 
development activities. 
Sec. 3123. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 
countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 
Sec. 3124.
Department of Energy energy parks program. 
Subtitle C—Reports 
Sec. 3131. Report on graded security protection policy. 
TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 
Sec. 3201. Authorization. 
TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES 
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 
TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 
Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the mer-
chant marine for fiscal year 2011. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00696
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4151 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 3502. Extension of Maritime Security Fleet program. 
Sec. 3503. United States Merchant Marine Academy nominations of residents of 
the Northern Mariana Islands. 
Sec. 3504. Research authority. 
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. 
For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘congressional defense 
committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) 
of title 10, United States Code. 
DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 101. Army. 
Sec. 102. Navy and Marine Corps. 
Sec. 103. Air Force. 
Sec. 104. Defense-wide activities. 
Subtitle B—Navy Programs 
Sec. 111. Multiyear funding for detail design and construction of LHA Replacement 
ship designated LHA–7. 
Sec. 112. Requirement to maintain Navy airborne signals intelligence, surveillance, 
and reconnaissance capabilities. 
Sec. 113. Report on naval force structure and missile defense. 
Sec. 114. Reports on service-life extension of F/A–18 aircraft by the Department of 
the Navy. 
Subtitle C—Joint and Multiservice Matters 
Sec. 121. Limitations on biometric systems funds. 
Sec. 122. System management plan and matrix for the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter 
aircraft program. 
Sec. 123. Quarterly reports on use of Combat Mission Requirements funds. 
Sec. 124. Counter-improvised explosive device initiatives database. 
Sec. 125. Study on lightweight body armor solutions. 
Sec. 126. Integration of solid state laser systems into certain aircraft. 
Sec. 127. Contracts for commercial imaging satellite capacities. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 101. ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for procurement for the Army as follows: 
(1) For aircraft, $5,908,384,000. 
(2) For missiles, $1,670,463,000. 
(3) 
For 
weapons 
and 
tracked 
combat 
vehicles, 
$1,656,263,000. 
(4) For ammunition, $1,953,194,000. 
(5) For other procurement, $9,758,965,000. 
SEC. 102. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS. 
(a) NAVY.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Navy as follows: 
(1) For aircraft, $18,877,139,000. 
(2) For weapons, including missiles and torpedoes, 
$3,358,264,000. 
10 USC 101 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00697
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4152 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) For shipbuilding and conversion, $15,724,520,000. 
(4) For other procurement, $6,381,815,000. 
(b) MARINE CORPS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement for the Marine Corps 
in the amount of $1,296,838,000. 
(c) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for procurement 
of ammunition for the Navy and the Marine Corps in the amount 
of $817,991,000. 
SEC. 103. AIR FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for procurement for the Air Force as follows: 
(1) For aircraft, $14,668,408,000. 
(2) For ammunition, $672,420,000. 
(3) For missiles, $5,444,464,000. 
(4) For other procurement, $17,845,342,000. 
SEC. 104. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 
for 
Defense-wide 
procurement 
in 
the 
amount 
of 
$4,398,168,000. 
Subtitle B—Navy Programs 
SEC. 111. MULTIYEAR FUNDING FOR DETAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUC-
TION OF LHA REPLACEMENT SHIP DESIGNATED LHA–7. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO USE MULTIPLE YEARS OF FUNDING.—The 
Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract for detail design 
and construction of the LHA Replacement ship designated LHA– 
7 that provides that, subject to subsection (b), funds for payments 
under the contract may be provided from amounts authorized to 
be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding 
and Conversion, Navy, for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. 
(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract 
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation 
of the United States to make a payment under the contract for 
a fiscal year after fiscal year 2011 is subject to the availability 
of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 
SEC. 112. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN NAVY AIRBORNE SIGNALS 
INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE 
CAPABILITIES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The Navy terminated the EP–X program to acquire 
a new land-based airborne signals intelligence capability 
because of escalating costs and funds budgeted for the program 
were re-allocated to other priorities. 
(2) The Navy took this action without planning and budg-
eting for alternative means to meet operational requirements 
for tactical-level and theater-level signals intelligence capabili-
ties to support the combatant commands and national intel-
ligence consumers. 
(3) The principal Navy airborne signals intelligence capa-
bility today is the EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated 
Electronic System II (ARIES II)—the aircraft and associated 
electronic equipment of this system are aging and will require 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00698
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4153 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
replacement or substantial ongoing upgrades to continue to 
meet requirements. 
(4) The Special Projects Aircraft (SPA) platform of the 
Navy is the second critical element in the airborne signals 
intelligence capability of the Navy and provides the Navy its 
most advanced, comprehensive multi-intelligence and quick- 
reaction capability available. 
(b) REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN CAPABILITIES.— 
(1) PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT OF PLATFORMS.—The Sec-
retary of the Navy may not retire (or to prepare to retire) 
the EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic 
System II or Special Projects Aircraft platform. 
(2) MAINTENANCE
OF
PLATFORMS.—The Secretary of the 
Navy shall continue to maintain, sustain, and upgrade the 
EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System 
II and Special Projects Aircraft platforms in order to provide 
capabilities necessary to operate effectively against rapidly 
evolving threats and to meet combatant commander operational 
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements. 
(3) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than February 1, 2011, and 
annually thereafter, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intel-
ligence and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 
shall jointly certify to Congress the following: 
(A) The Secretary of the Navy is maintaining and 
sustaining the EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated 
Electronic System II and Special Projects Aircraft platform 
in a manner that meets the intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance requirements of the commanders of the 
combatant commands. 
(B) Any plan for the retirement or replacement of 
the EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic 
System II or Special Projects Aircraft platform will provide, 
in the aggregate, an equivalent or superior capability and 
capacity to the platform concerned. 
(4) TERMINATION.—The requirements of this subsection 
with respect to the EP–3E Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated 
Electronic System II or the Special Projects Aircraft platform 
shall expire on the commencement of the fielding by the Navy 
of a platform or mix of platforms and sensors that are, in 
the aggregate, equivalent or superior to the EP–3E Airborne 
Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II (spiral 3) or 
the Special Projects Aircraft (P909) platform. 
(c) RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER OF SABER FOCUS PROGRAM ISR 
CAPABILITIES.— 
(1) RESTRICTION.—The Secretary of the Navy may not 
transfer the Saber Focus unmanned aerial system, associated 
equipment, or processing, exploitation, and dissemination 
capabilities of the Saber Focus program to the Secretary of 
the Air Force until 30 days after the Secretary of the Air 
Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that 
after such a transfer, the Secretary of the Air Force will provide 
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (hereinafter in 
this section referred to as ‘‘ISR’’) capabilities at the same or 
greater capability and capacity level as the capability or 
capacity level at which the Saber Focus program provides such 
capabilities to the area of operations concerned as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
Time period. 
Certification. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00699
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4154 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CONTINUED NAVY PROVISION OF CAPABILITIES.—The Sec-
retary of the Navy shall continue to provide Saber Focus ISR 
program capabilities at the same or greater capability and 
capacity level as the capability or capacity level at which the 
Saber Focus program provides such capabilities as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act to the area of operations concerned 
until— 
(A) the certification referred to in paragraph (1) is 
provided to the congressional defense committees; or 
(B) 30 days after the Secretary of Defense certifies 
to the congressional defense committees that the ISR 
capabilities of the Saber Focus program are no longer 
required to mitigate the ISR requirements of the combatant 
commander in the area of operations concerned. 
SEC. 113. REPORT ON NAVAL FORCE STRUCTURE AND MISSILE 
DEFENSE. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of the Navy and 
the Chief of Naval Operations, shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the force structure requirements 
of the major combatant surface vessels with respect to ballistic 
missile defense. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report shall include the following: 
(1) An analysis of whether the requirement for sea-based 
missile defense can be accommodated by upgrading Aegis ships 
that exist as of the date of the report or by procuring additional 
combatant surface vessels. 
(2) A discussion of whether such sea-based missile defense 
will require increasing the overall number of combatant surface 
vessels beyond the requirement of 88 cruisers and destroyers 
in the 313-ship fleet plan of the Navy. 
(3) A discussion of the process for determining the number 
of Aegis ships needed by each commander of the combatant 
commands to fulfill ballistic missile defense requirements, 
including (in consultation with the Chairman of the Joints 
Chiefs of Staff) the number of such ships needed to support 
the phased, adaptive approach to ballistic missile defense in 
Europe. 
(4) A discussion of the impact of Aegis Ashore missile 
defense deployments, as well as deployment of other elements 
of the ballistic missile defense system, on Aegis ballistic missile 
defense ship force structure requirements. 
(5) A discussion of the potential effect of ballistic missile 
defense operations on the ability of the Navy to meet surface 
fleet demands in each geographic area and for each mission 
set. 
(6) An evaluation of how the Aegis ballistic missile defense 
program can succeed as part of a balanced fleet of adequate 
size and strength to meet the security needs of the United 
States. 
(7) A description of both the shortfalls and the benefits 
of expected technological advancements in the sea-based missile 
defense program. 
(8) A description of the anticipated plan for deployment 
of Aegis ballistic missile defense ships within the context of 
the fleet response plan. 
Time period. 
Certification. 
Certification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00700
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4155 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 114. REPORTS ON SERVICE-LIFE EXTENSION OF F/A–18 AIRCRAFT 
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. 
(a) COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION OF 
F/A–18 AIRCRAFT.—Before the Secretary of the Navy may enter 
into a program to extend the service life of F/A–18 aircraft beyond 
8,600 hours, the Secretary shall— 
(1) conduct a cost-benefit analysis, in accordance with Office 
of Management and Budget Circular A–94, comparing 
extending the service life of existing F/A–18 aircraft with pro-
curing additional F/A–18E or F/A–18F aircraft as a means 
of managing the shortfall of the Department of the Navy in 
strike fighter aircraft; and 
(2) submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
on such cost-benefit analysis. 
(b) ELEMENTS
OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS.—The cost-benefit 
analysis required by subsection (a)(1) shall include the following: 
(1) An estimate of the full costs, over the period covered 
by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress 
under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, with the 
budget of the President, of extending legacy F/A–18 aircraft 
beyond 8,600 hours, including— 
(A) any increases in operation and maintenance costs 
associated with operating such aircraft beyond a service 
life of 8,600 hours; and 
(B) the costs with respect to the airframe, avionics, 
software, and aircraft subsystems and components required 
to remain relevant in countering future threats and 
meeting the warfighting requirements of the commanders 
of the combatant commands. 
(2) An estimate of the full costs, over the period covered 
by such future-years defense program, of procuring such addi-
tional F/A–18E or F/A–18F aircraft as would be required to 
meet the strike fighter requirements of the Department of 
the Navy in the event the service life of legacy F/A–18 aircraft 
is not extended beyond 8,600 hours. 
(3) An assessment of risks associated with extending the 
service life of legacy F/A–18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, 
including the level of certainty that the Secretary will be able 
to achieve such an extension. 
(4) An estimate of the cost-per-flight hour incurred in oper-
ating legacy F/A–18 aircraft with a service life extended beyond 
8,600 hours. 
(5) An estimate of the cost-per-flight hour incurred for 
operating new F/A–18E or FA–18F aircraft. 
(6) An assessment of any alternatives to extending the 
service life of legacy F/A–18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours or 
buying additional F/A–18E or F/A–18F aircraft that may be 
available to the Secretary to manage the shortfall of the Depart-
ment of the Navy in strike fighter aircraft. 
(c) ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS
OF REPORT.—In addition to the 
information required in the cost-benefit analysis under subsection 
(b), the report under subsection (a)(2) shall include an assessment 
of the following: 
(1) Differences in capabilities of— 
(A) legacy F/A–18 aircraft that have undergone service- 
life extension; 
(B) F/A–18E or F/A–18F aircraft; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00701
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4156 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) F–35C aircraft. 
(2) Differences in capabilities that would result under the 
legacy F/A–18 aircraft service-life extension program if such 
program would— 
(A) provide only airframe-life extensions to the legacy 
F/A–18 aircraft fleet; and 
(B) provide for airframe-life extensions and capability 
upgrades to the legacy F/A–18 aircraft fleet. 
(3) Any disruption that procuring additional F/A–18E or 
F/A–18F aircraft, rather than extending the service life of legacy 
F/A–18 aircraft beyond 8,600 hours, would have on the plan 
of the Navy to procure operational carrier-variant Joint Strike 
Fighter aircraft. 
(4) Any changes that procuring additional F/A–18E or FA– 
18F aircraft, rather than extending the service life of legacy 
F/A–18 aircraft beyond 8600 hours, would have on the force 
structure or force mix intended by the Navy for its carrier 
air wings. 
(5) Any other operational implication of extending (or not 
extending) the service life of legacy F/A–18 aircraft that the 
Secretary considers appropriate. 
(d) REPORT ON OPERATIONAL F/A–18 AIRCRAFT SQUADRONS.— 
Before reducing the number of F/A–18 aircraft in an operational 
squadron of the Navy or Marine Corps, the Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report that discusses 
the operational risks and impacts of reducing the squadron size. 
The report shall include an assessment of the following: 
(1) The effect of the reduction on the operational capability 
and readiness of the Navy and the Marine Corps to conduct 
overseas contingency operations. 
(2) The effect of the reduction on the capability of the 
Navy and the Marine Corps to meet ongoing operational 
demands. 
(3) Any mechanisms the Secretary intends to use to miti-
gate any risks associated with the squadron size reduction. 
(4) The effect of the reduction on pilots and ground support 
crews of F/A–18 aircraft, in terms of training, readiness, and 
war fighting capabilities. 
(e) REPORT ON F/A–18 AIRCRAFT TRAINING SQUADRONS.—Before 
reducing the size of an F/A–18 aircraft training squadron, or 
transferring an F/A–18 training aircraft for operational needs, the 
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report that describes— 
(1) any risks to sustaining required training of F/A–18 
aircraft pilots with a reduced training aircraft base; and 
(2) any actions the Navy is taking to mitigate the risks 
described under paragraph (1). 
Subtitle C—Joint and Multiservice Matters 
SEC. 121. LIMITATIONS ON BIOMETRIC SYSTEMS FUNDS. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2011 for biometrics pro-
grams and operations, not more than 85 percent may be obligated 
or expended until— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00702
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4157 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the actions taken and planned 
to be taken— 
(A) to implement subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 
paragraph (16) of the National Security Presidential Direc-
tive dated June 5, 2008 (NSPD–59); 
(B) to implement the recommendations of the Comp-
troller General of the United States included in the report 
of the Comptroller General numbered GAO–08–1065 dated 
September 2008; 
(C) to implement the recommendations of the Comp-
troller General included in the report of the Comptroller 
General numbered GAO–09–49 dated October 2008; 
(D) to fully and completely characterize the current 
biometrics architecture and establish the objective architec-
ture for the Department of Defense; 
(E) to ensure that an official of the Office of the Sec-
retary of Defense has the authority necessary to be respon-
sible for ensuring that all funding for biometrics programs 
and operations is programmed, budgeted, and executed; 
and 
(F) to ensure that an officer within the Office of the 
Joint Chiefs of Staff has the authority necessary to be 
responsible for ensuring the development and implementa-
tion of common and interoperable standards for the collec-
tion, storage, and use of biometrics data by all commanders 
of the combatant commands and their commands; and 
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date on 
which the report is submitted under paragraph (1). 
SEC. 122. SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN AND MATRIX FOR THE F–35 
JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER AIRCRAFT PROGRAM. 
(a) SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 
(1) PLAN
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, acting 
through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics, shall establish a management plan for 
the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft program under which 
decisions to commit to specified levels of production are linked 
to progress in meeting specified program milestones, including 
design, manufacturing, testing, and fielding milestones for crit-
ical system maturity elements. 
(2) NATURE OF PLAN.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall 
align technical progress milestones with acquisition milestones 
in a system maturity matrix. The matrix shall provide criteria 
and conditions for comparing expected levels of demonstrated 
system maturity with annual production commitments, starting 
with the fiscal year 2012 production program, and continuing 
over the remaining life of the system development and dem-
onstration program. The matrix and criteria shall include ele-
ments such as the following: 
(A) Manufacturing maturity, including on-time deliv-
eries, manufacturing process control, quality rates, and 
labor efficiency rates. 
(B) Engineering maturity, including metrics for the 
number of new design actions and number of design 
changes in a given period. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00703
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4158 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) Performance and testing progress, including test 
points, hours and flights accomplished, capabilities dem-
onstrated, key performance parameters, and attributes 
demonstrated. 
(D) Mission effectiveness and system reliability, 
including operational effectiveness and reliability growth. 
(E) Training, fielding, and deployment status. 
(b) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report setting forth 
the plan required by subsection (a). The report shall include— 
(A) the proposed system maturity matrix described 
in subsection (a)(2), including a description, for each ele-
ment specified in the matrix under subsection (a)(2), of 
the criteria and milestones to be used in evaluating actual 
program performance against planned performance for each 
annual production commitment; and 
(B) a description of the actions to be taken to imple-
ment the plan. 
(2) UPDATES.—The Secretary shall submit to Congress, at 
or about the same time as the submittal to Congress of the 
budget of the President for any fiscal year after fiscal year 
2012 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, 
United States Code), any modification to the plan required 
by subsection (a) that was made during the preceding calendar 
year, including a rationale for each such modification. 
(c) REPORT ON CAPABILITIES OF MARINE CORPS VARIANT OF 
F–35 FIGHTER AIRCRAFT AT INITIAL OPERATING CAPABILITY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on the expected 
capabilities of the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft at the 
time when the Marine Corps plans to declare Initial Operating 
Capability for the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft. The 
report shall be prepared in consultation with the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 
including a description of the following with respect to the 
F–35B Joint Strike Fighter aircraft: 
(A) Performance of the aircraft and its subsystems, 
compared to key performance parameters. 
(B) Expected capability to perform Marine Corps mis-
sions. 
(C) Required maintenance and logistics standards, 
including mission capability rates. 
(D) Expected levels of crew training and performance. 
(E) Product improvements that are planned before the 
Initial Operating Capability of the aircraft to be made 
after the Initial Operating Capability of the aircraft, as 
planned in March 2010. 
SEC. 123. QUARTERLY REPORTS ON USE OF COMBAT MISSION 
REQUIREMENTS FUNDS. 
(a) QUARTERLY REPORTS REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the end 
of each fiscal quarter, the commander of the United States 
10 USC 167 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00704
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4159 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Special Operations Command shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the use of Combat Mission 
Requirements funds during the preceding fiscal quarter. 
(2) COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS FUNDS.—For purposes 
of this section, Combat Mission Requirements funds are 
amounts available to the Department of Defense for Defense- 
wide procurement in the Combat Mission Requirements sub-
account of the Defense-wide Procurement account. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include, 
for the fiscal quarter covered by such report, the following: 
(1) The balance of the Combat Mission Requirements sub-
account at the beginning of such quarter. 
(2) The balance of the Combat Mission Requirements sub-
account at the end of such quarter. 
(3) Any transfer of funds into or out of the Combat Mission 
Requirements subaccount during such quarter, including the 
source of any funds transferred into the subaccount, and the 
objective of any transfer of funds out of the subaccount. 
(4) A description of any requirement— 
(A) approved for procurement using Combat Mission 
Requirements funds during such quarter; or 
(B) procured using such funds during such quarter. 
(5) With respect to each description of a requirement under 
paragraph (4), the amount of Combat Mission Requirements 
funds committed to the procurement or approved procurement 
of such requirement. 
(c) FORM.—Each report under subsection (a) shall be submitted 
in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 124. COUNTER-IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE INITIATIVES 
DATABASE. 
(a) COMPREHENSIVE DATABASE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through 
the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 
Organization, shall develop and maintain a comprehensive 
database containing appropriate information for coordinating, 
tracking, and archiving each counter-improvised explosive 
device initiative within the Department of Defense. The data-
base shall, at a minimum, ensure the visibility of each counter- 
improvised explosive device initiative. 
(2) USE OF INFORMATION.—Using information contained in 
the database developed under paragraph (1), the Secretary, 
acting through the Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive 
Device Defeat Organization, shall— 
(A) identify and eliminate redundant counter-impro-
vised explosive device initiatives; 
(B) facilitate the transition of counter-improvised explo-
sive device initiatives from funding under the Joint Impro-
vised Explosive Device Defeat Fund to funding provided 
by the military departments; and 
(C) notify the appropriate personnel and organizations 
prior to a counter-improvised explosive device initiative 
being funded through the Joint Improvised Explosive 
Device Defeat Fund. 
10 USC 113 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00705
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4160 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) COORDINATION.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Sec-
retary shall ensure that the Secretary of each military depart-
ment coordinates and collaborates on development of the data-
base to ensure its interoperability, completeness, consistency, 
and effectiveness. 
(b) METRICS.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the 
Director of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organiza-
tion, shall— 
(1) develop appropriate means to measure the effectiveness 
of counter-improvised explosive device initiatives; and 
(2) prioritize the funding of such initiatives according to 
such means. 
(c) 
COUNTER-IMPROVISED
EXPLOSIVE
DEVICE
INITIATIVE 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘counter-improvised explosive 
device initiative’’ means any project, program, or research activity 
funded by any component of the Department of Defense that is 
intended to assist or support efforts to counter, combat, or defeat 
the use of improvised explosive devices. 
SEC. 125. STUDY ON LIGHTWEIGHT BODY ARMOR SOLUTIONS. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter 
into a contract with a federally funded research and development 
center to conduct a study to— 
(1) assess the effectiveness of the processes used by the 
Secretary to identify and examine the requirements for lighter 
weight body armor systems; and 
(2) determine ways in which the Secretary may more effec-
tively address the research, development, and procurement 
requirements regarding reducing the weight of body armor. 
(b) MATTERS COVERED.—The study conducted under subsection 
(a) shall include findings and recommendations regarding the fol-
lowing: 
(1) The requirement for lighter weight body armor and 
personal protective equipment and the ability of the Secretary 
to meet such requirement. 
(2) Innovative design ideas for more modular body armor 
that allow for scalable protection levels for various missions 
and threats. 
(3) The need for research, development, and acquisition 
funding dedicated specifically for reducing the weight of body 
armor. 
(4) The efficiency and effectiveness of current body armor 
funding procedures and processes. 
(5) Industry concerns, capabilities, and willingness to invest 
in the development and production of lightweight body armor 
initiatives. 
(6) Barriers preventing the development of lighter weight 
body armor (including such barriers with respect to technical, 
institutional, or financial problems). 
(7) Changes to procedures or policy with respect to light-
weight body armor. 
(8) Other areas of concern not previously addressed by 
equipping boards, body armor producers, or program managers. 
(c) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the study 
conducted under subsection (a). 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00706
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4161 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 126. INTEGRATION OF SOLID STATE LASER SYSTEMS INTO CER-
TAIN AIRCRAFT. 
(a) ANALYSIS
OF FEASIBILITY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall conduct an analysis of the feasibility of integrating 
solid state laser systems into the aircraft platforms specified in 
subsection (b) for purposes of permitting such aircraft to accomplish 
their missions, including to provide close air support. 
(b) AIRCRAFT.—The aircraft platforms specified in this sub-
section shall include, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) The C–130 aircraft. 
(2) The B–1 bomber aircraft. 
(3) The F–35 fighter aircraft. 
(c) SCOPE OF ANALYSIS.—The analysis required by subsection 
(a) shall include a determination of the following: 
(1) The estimated cost per unit of each laser system ana-
lyzed. 
(2) The estimated cost of operation and maintenance of 
each aircraft platform specified in subsection (b) in connection 
with each laser system analyzed, noting that the fidelity of 
such analysis may not be uniform for all aircraft platforms. 
SEC. 127. CONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL IMAGING SATELLITE CAPAC-
ITIES. 
(a) TELESCOPE
REQUIREMENTS
UNDER
CONTRACTS
AFTER 
2010.—Except as provided in subsection (b), any contract for addi-
tional commercial imaging satellite capability or capacity entered 
into by the Department of Defense after December 31, 2010, shall 
require that the imaging telescope providing such capability or 
capacity under such contract has an aperture of not less than 
1.5 meters. 
(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limita-
tion in subsection (a) if— 
(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 
committees written certification that the waiver is in the 
national security interests of the United States; and 
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date 
on which the certification under paragraph (1) is submitted. 
(c) CONTINUATION OF CURRENT CONTRACTS.—The limitation in 
subsection (a) may not be construed to prohibit or prevent the 
Secretary of Defense from continuing or maintaining current 
commercial imaging satellite capability or capacity in orbit or under 
contract by December 31, 2010. 
TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, 
TEST, AND EVALUATION 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 
Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 211. Enhancement of Department of Defense support of science, mathematics, 
and engineering education. 
Sec. 212. Limitation on use of funds by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agen-
cy for operation of National Cyber Range. 
Sec. 213. Separate program elements required for research and development of 
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. 
Sec. 214. Program for research, development, and deployment of advanced ground 
vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components. 
Time period. 
Certification. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00707
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4162 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 215. Demonstration and pilot projects on cybersecurity. 
Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 
Sec. 221. Sense of Congress on ballistic missile defense. 
Sec. 222. Repeal of prohibition of certain contracts by Missile Defense Agency with 
foreign entities. 
Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for missile defense interceptors in Eu-
rope. 
Sec. 224. Medium Extended Air Defense System. 
Sec. 225. Acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system. 
Sec. 226. Authority to support ballistic missile shared early warning with the 
Czech Republic. 
Sec. 227. Report on phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. 
Sec. 228. Independent review and assessment of the Ground-Based Midcourse De-
fense system. 
Sec. 229. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. 
Subtitle D—Reports 
Sec. 231. Report on analysis of alternatives and program requirements for the 
Ground Combat Vehicle program. 
Sec. 232. Cost benefit analysis of future tank-fired munitions. 
Sec. 233. Annual Comptroller General report on the VH–(XX) presidential heli-
copter acquisition program. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress affirming the importance of Department of Defense 
participation in development of next generation semiconductor tech-
nologies. 
Sec. 242. Pilot program on collaborative energy security. 
Sec. 243. Pilot program to include technology protection features during research 
and development of defense systems. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $10,093,704,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $17,881,008,000. 
(3) For the Air Force, $27,319,627,000. 
(4) For Defense-wide activities, $21,292,576,000, of which 
$194,910,000 is authorized for the Director of Operational Test 
and Evaluation. 
Subtitle B—Program Requirements, 
Restrictions, and Limitations 
SEC. 211. ENHANCEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT 
OF SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND ENGINEERING EDU-
CATION. 
(a) DISCHARGE
OF
SUPPORT
THROUGH
MILITARY
DEPART-
MENTS.—Section 2192(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new para-
graph (2): 
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense may carry out the authority 
in paragraph (1) through the Secretaries of the military depart-
ments.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00708
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4163 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) PARTNERSHIP INTERMEDIARIES FOR PURPOSES OF EDUCATION 
PARTNERSHIPS.—Section 2194 of such title is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new sub-
section (e): 
‘‘(e) The Secretary of Defense may permit the director of a 
defense laboratory to enter into a cooperative agreement with an 
appropriate entity to act as an intermediary and assist the director 
in carrying out activities under this section.’’. 
SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS BY DEFENSE ADVANCED 
RESEARCH 
PROJECTS 
AGENCY 
FOR 
OPERATION 
OF 
NATIONAL CYBER RANGE. 
(a) PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS PENDING REPORT.—Amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by this Act and available to the 
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency may not be obligated 
or expended for the National Cyber Range established in support 
of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative until the 
date that is 90 days after the date on which the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report described in subsection (c). 
(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS AFTER REPORT.—Commencing 
on the date that is 90 days after the date on which the Under 
Secretary submits a report described in subsection (c), amounts 
described in subsection (a) shall be available for obligation or 
expenditure only for the purposes of research and development 
activities that the Under Secretary considers appropriate for 
ensuring and assessing the functionality of the National Cyber 
Range. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The report described in this subsection 
is a report setting forth a plan for the transition of the National 
Cyber Range to operation and sustainment. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report shall include, at a minimum, 
the following: 
(A) An analysis of various potential recipients under 
the transition of the National Cyber Range. 
(B) For each recipient analyzed under subparagraph 
(A), a description of the proposed transition of the National 
Cyber Range to such recipient, including the proposed 
schedule and funding for such transition. 
(3) POTENTIAL RECIPIENTS.—The recipients analyzed in the 
report under paragraph (2)(A) shall include, at a minimum, 
the following: 
(A) A consortium for the operation and sustainment 
of the National Cyber Range as a government-owned, 
government-operated facility. 
(B) A consortium for the operation and sustainment 
of the National Cyber Range as a government-owned, con-
tractor-operated facility. 
SEC. 213. SEPARATE PROGRAM ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR RESEARCH 
AND DEVELOPMENT OF JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE. 
In the budget materials submitted to the President by the 
Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, 
pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the 
budget for fiscal year 2012, and each subsequent fiscal year, the 
10 USC 221 note. 
Time period. 
Time period. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00709
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4164 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Secretary shall ensure that within each research, development, 
test, and evaluation account of the Army and the Navy a separate, 
dedicated program element is assigned to the Joint Light Tactical 
Vehicle. 
SEC. 214. PROGRAM FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEPLOY-
MENT 
OF 
ADVANCED 
GROUND 
VEHICLES, 
GROUND 
VEHICLE SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS. 
(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may carry 
out a program for research and development on, and deployment 
of, advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, 
and components within the Department of Defense. 
(b) GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.—The goals and objectives of the 
program authorized by subsection (a) are as follows: 
(1) To identify and support technological advances that 
are necessary for the development of advanced technologies 
for use in ground vehicles of types to be used by the Department 
of Defense. 
(2) To procure and deploy significant quantities of advanced 
technology ground vehicles for use by the Department. 
(3) To maximize the leverage of Federal and nongovern-
ment funds used for the development and deployment of 
advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, 
and components. 
(c) ELEMENTS OF PROGRAM.—The program authorized by sub-
section (a) may include— 
(1) enhanced research and development activities for 
advanced technology ground vehicles, ground vehicle systems, 
and components, including— 
(A) increased investments in research and development 
of batteries, advanced materials, power electronics, fuel 
cells and fuel cell systems, hybrid systems, and advanced 
engines; 
(B) pilot projects for the demonstration of advanced 
technologies in ground vehicles for use by the Department 
of Defense; and 
(C) the establishment of public-private partnerships, 
including research centers, manufacturing and prototyping 
facilities, and test beds, to speed the development, deploy-
ment, and transition to use of advanced technology ground 
vehicles, ground vehicle systems, and components; and 
(2) enhanced activities to procure and deploy advanced 
technology ground vehicles in the Department, including— 
(A) preferences for the purchase of advanced technology 
ground vehicles; 
(B) the use of authorities available to the Secretary 
of Defense to stimulate the development and production 
of advanced technology systems and ground vehicles 
through purchases, loan guarantees, and other mecha-
nisms; 
(C) pilot programs to demonstrate advanced technology 
ground vehicles and associated infrastructure at select 
defense installations; 
(D) metrics to evaluate environmental and other bene-
fits, life cycle costs, and greenhouse gas emissions associ-
ated with the deployment of advanced technology ground 
vehicles; and 
10 USC 2358 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00710
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4165 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(E) schedules and objectives for the conversion of the 
ground vehicle fleet of the Department to advanced tech-
nology ground vehicles. 
(d) COOPERATION WITH INDUSTRY AND ACADEMIA.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may carry out the program 
authorized by subsection (a) through partnerships and other 
cooperative agreements with private sector entities, including— 
(A) universities and other academic institutions; 
(B) companies in the automobile and truck manufac-
turing industry; 
(C) companies that supply systems and components 
to the automobile and truck manufacturing industry; and 
(D) any other companies or private sector entities that 
the Secretary considers appropriate. 
(2) NATURE OF COOPERATION.—The Secretary shall ensure 
that any partnership or cooperative agreement under paragraph 
(1) provides for private sector participants to collectively con-
tribute, in cash or in kind, not less than one-half of the total 
cost of the activities carried out under such partnership or 
cooperative agreement. 
(e) COORDINATION WITH OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The pro-
gram authorized by subsection (a) shall be carried out, to the 
maximum extent practicable, in coordination with the Department 
of Energy and other appropriate departments and agencies of the 
Federal Government. 
SEC. 
215. 
DEMONSTRATION 
AND 
PILOT 
PROJECTS 
ON 
CYBERSECURITY. 
(a) DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON PROCESSES FOR APPLICATION 
OF
COMMERCIAL
TECHNOLOGIES
TO
CYBERSECURITY
REQUIRE-
MENTS.— 
(1) PROJECTS
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense and 
the Secretaries of the military departments shall jointly carry 
out demonstration projects to assess the feasibility and advis-
ability of using various business models and processes to rapidly 
and effectively identify innovative commercial technologies and 
apply such technologies to Department of Defense and other 
cybersecurity requirements. 
(2) SCOPE OF PROJECTS.—Any demonstration project under 
paragraph (1) shall be carried out in such a manner as to 
contribute to the cyber policy review of the President and 
the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative. 
(b) PILOT PROGRAMS ON CYBERSECURITY REQUIRED.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall support or conduct pilot programs on 
cybersecurity with respect to the following areas: 
(1) Threat sensing and warning for information networks 
worldwide. 
(2) Managed security services for cybersecurity within the 
defense industrial base, military departments, and combatant 
commands. 
(3) Use of private processes and infrastructure to address 
threats, 
problems, 
vulnerabilities, 
or 
opportunities 
in 
cybersecurity. 
(4) Processes for securing the global supply chain. 
(5) Processes for threat sensing and security of cloud com-
puting infrastructure. 
(c) REPORTS.— 
10 USC 2225 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00711
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4166 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) REPORTS
REQUIRED.—Not later than 240 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter 
at or about the time of the submittal to Congress of the budget 
of the President for a fiscal year (as submitted pursuant to 
section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), the Secretary 
of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Home-
land Security, submit to Congress a report on any demonstra-
tion projects carried out under subsection (a), and on the pilot 
projects carried out under subsection (b), during the preceding 
year. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall 
include the following: 
(A) A description and assessment of any activities 
under the demonstration projects and pilot projects referred 
to in paragraph (1) during the preceding year. 
(B) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under 
subsection (b)(2)— 
(i) a quantitative and qualitative assessment of 
the extent to which managed security services covered 
by the pilot project could provide effective and afford-
able cybersecurity capabilities for components of the 
Department of Defense and for entities in the defense 
industrial base, and an assessment whether such serv-
ices could be expanded rapidly to a large scale without 
exceeding the ability of the Federal Government to 
manage such expansion; and 
(ii) an assessment of whether managed security 
services are compatible with the cybersecurity strategy 
of the Department of Defense with respect to con-
ducting an active, in-depth defense under the direction 
of United States Cyber Command. 
(C) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under 
subsection (b)(3)— 
(i) a description of any performance metrics estab-
lished for purposes of the pilot project, and a descrip-
tion of any processes developed for purposes of account-
ability and governance under any partnership under 
the pilot project; and 
(ii) an assessment of the role a partnership such 
as a partnership under the pilot project would play 
in the acquisition of cyberspace capabilities by the 
Department of Defense, including a role with respect 
to the development and approval of requirements, 
approval and oversight of acquiring capabilities, test 
and evaluation of new capabilities, and budgeting for 
new capabilities. 
(D) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under 
subsection (b)(4)— 
(i) a framework and taxonomy for evaluating prac-
tices that secure the global supply chain, as well as 
practices for securely operating in an uncertain or com-
promised supply chain; 
(ii) an assessment of the viability of applying 
commercial practices for securing the global supply 
chain; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00712
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4167 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(iii) an assessment of the viability of applying 
commercial practices for securely operating in an 
uncertain or compromised supply chain. 
(E) For the pilot projects supported or conducted under 
subsection (b)(5)— 
(i) an assessment of the capabilities of Federal 
Government providers to offer secure cloud computing 
environments; and 
(ii) an assessment of the capabilities of commercial 
providers to offer secure cloud computing environments 
to the Federal Government. 
(3) FORM.—Each report under this subsection shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 
SEC. 221. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 
(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress— 
(1) that the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense 
in Europe is an appropriate response to the existing ballistic 
missile threat from Iran to the European territory of North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and to potential future 
ballistic missile capabilities of Iran; 
(2) that the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense 
in Europe is not intended to, and will not, provide a missile 
defense capability relative to the ballistic missile deterrent 
forces of the Russian Federation, or diminish strategic stability 
with the Russian Federation; 
(3) to support the efforts of the United States Government 
and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to pursue coopera-
tion with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense 
relative to Iranian missile threats; 
(4) that the ground-based midcourse defense system 
deployed in Alaska and California currently provides adequate 
defensive capability for the United States against currently 
anticipated future long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran, 
and this capability will be enhanced as the system is improved, 
including by the planned deployment of an AN/TPY–2 radar 
in southern Europe in 2011; 
(5) that the ground-based midcourse defense system should 
be maintained, enhanced, and adequately tested to ensure its 
operational capability through its service life; 
(6) that the United States should, as stated in its unilateral 
statement accompanying the New START Treaty, ‘‘continue 
improving and deploying its missile defense systems in order 
to defend itself against limited attack and as part of our collabo-
rative approach to strengthening stability in key regions’’; 
(7) that, as part of this effort, the Department of Defense 
should pursue the development, testing, and deployment of 
operationally effective versions of all variants of the standard 
missile–3 for all four phases of the phased, adaptive approach 
to missile defense in Europe; 
(8) that the standard missile–3 block IIB interceptor missile 
planned for deployment in phase 4 of the phased, adaptive 
approach should be capable of addressing the potential future 
threat of intermediate-range and long-range ballistic missiles 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00713
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4168 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
from Iran, including intercontinental ballistic missiles that 
could be capable of reaching the United States; 
(9) that there are no constraints contained in the New 
START Treaty on the development or deployment by the United 
States of effective missile defenses, including all phases of 
the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe 
and further enhancements to the ground-based midcourse 
defense system, as well as future missile defenses; and 
(10) that the Department of Defense should continue the 
development, testing, and assessment of the two-stage ground- 
based interceptor in such a manner as to provide a hedge 
against potential technical challenges with the development 
of the standard missile–3 block IIB interceptor missile as a 
means of augmenting the defense of Europe and of the home-
land against a limited ballistic missile attack from nations 
such as North Korea or Iran. 
(b) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the United States 
of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further 
Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on 
April 8, 2010. 
SEC. 222. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS BY MIS-
SILE DEFENSE AGENCY WITH FOREIGN ENTITIES. 
Section 222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law 100–180; 101 Stat. 1055; 10 
U.S.C. 2431 note) is repealed. 
SEC. 223. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MISSILE 
DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS IN EUROPE. 
(a) LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF INTER-
CEPTORS.—No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal 
year 2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended 
for site activation, construction, or deployment of missile defense 
interceptors on European land as part of the phased, adaptive 
approach to missile defense in Europe until— 
(1) any nation agreeing to host such system has signed 
and ratified a missile defense basing agreement and a status 
of forces agreement authorizing the deployment of such inter-
ceptors; and 
(2) a period of 45 days has elapsed following the date 
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees the report on the independent assessment 
of alternative missile defense systems in Europe required by 
section 235(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2235). 
(b) LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OR DEPLOYMENT OF INTERCEP-
TORS.—No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or other-
wise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 
2011 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended 
for the procurement (other than initial long-lead procurement) or 
deployment of operational missiles on European land as part of 
the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe until 
the Secretary of Defense, after receiving the views of the Director 
of Operational Test and Evaluation, submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report certifying that the proposed interceptor 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
Time period. 
International 
agreements. 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00714
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4169 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to be deployed as part of such missile defense system has dem-
onstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing, 
a high probability of working in an operationally effective manner 
and that such missile defense system has the ability to accomplish 
the mission. 
(c) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limita-
tions in subsections (a) and (b) if— 
(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense 
committees written certification that the waiver is in the urgent 
national security interests of the United States; and 
(2) a period of seven days has elapsed following the date 
on which the certification under paragraph (1) is submitted. 
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed 
so as to limit the obligation and expenditure of funds for any 
missile defense activities not otherwise limited by subsection (a) 
or (b), including, with respect to the planned deployments of missile 
defense interceptors on European land as part of the phased, 
adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe— 
(1) research, development, test and evaluation; 
(2) site surveys; 
(3) studies and analyses; and 
(4) site planning and design and construction design. 
(e) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 234 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–81; 123 
Stat. 2234) is repealed. 
SEC. 224. MEDIUM EXTENDED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM. 
(a) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Of the amounts 
authorized to be appropriated in this title for fiscal year 2011 
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, of the 
amount that corresponds with budget activity five, line 117, in 
the budget transmitted to Congress by the President for fiscal 
year 2011, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended 
until the date on which— 
(1) the Secretary of Defense completes the critical design 
review and the system program review for the medium extended 
air defense system program and decides to proceed with the 
program; and 
(2) the Secretary submits in writing to the congressional 
defense committees a report containing the decision referred 
to in paragraph (1) to proceed with the medium extended 
air defense system. 
(b) FURTHER LIMITATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts authorized to be appro-
priated in this title for fiscal year 2011 for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation, Army, of the amount that cor-
responds with budget activity five, line 117, in the budget 
transmitted to Congress by the President for fiscal year 2011, 
not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until 
a period of 30 days have elapsed following the date on which 
the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees 
a report containing the elements specified in paragraph (2). 
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The elements specified in this 
paragraph for the report described in paragraph (1) are the 
following: 
(A) A detailed description of the decision described 
in subsection (a)(1) and the explanation for that decision. 
Time period. 
Reports. 
Reports. 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
Time period. 
Certification. 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00715
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4170 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) A cost estimate performed by the Director of Cost 
Assessment and Program Evaluation of the medium 
extended air defense system program, including an analysis 
of the cost growth in the program and an explanation 
of what effect such cost growth would have if the program 
were subject to the provisions of section 2433 of title 10, 
United States Code (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Nunn- 
McCurdy Act’’). 
(C) An analysis of alternatives to the medium extended 
air defense system program and its component elements. 
(D) A description of the planned schedule and cost 
for the development, production, and deployment of the 
medium extended air defense system, including the cost 
and schedule for any variations to the baseline program 
to be fielded by the Armed Forces. 
(E) A description of the role of Germany and Italy 
in the medium extended air defense system program, 
including the role of such countries in procurement or 
production of elements of such program. 
(F) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense 
considers appropriate. 
(c) FORM OF REPORTS.—The reports submitted under this sec-
tion shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 
classified annex. 
SEC. 225. ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS ON THE BALLISTIC 
MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 
(a) BASELINES REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
ensure that the Missile Defense Agency establishes and maintains 
an acquisition baseline for each program element of the ballistic 
missile defense system, as specified in section 223 of title 10, 
United States Code. 
(b) ELEMENTS
OF
BASELINES.—Each acquisition baseline 
required by subsection (a) for a program element shall include 
the following: 
(1) A comprehensive schedule for the program element, 
including— 
(A) research and development milestones; 
(B) acquisition milestones, including design reviews 
and key decision points; 
(C) key test events, including ground and flight tests 
and ballistic missile defense system tests; and 
(D) delivery and fielding schedules. 
(2) A detailed technical description of— 
(A) the capability to be developed, including hardware 
and software; 
(B) system requirements; 
(C) how the proposed capability satisfies a capability 
identified by the commanders of the combatant commands 
on a prioritized capabilities list; 
(D) key knowledge points that must be achieved to 
permit continuation of the program and to inform produc-
tion and deployment decisions; and 
(E) how the Missile Defense Agency plans to improve 
the capability over time. 
(3) A cost estimate for the program element, including— 
(A) a life cycle cost estimate; 
10 USC 223 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00716
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4171 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) program acquisition unit costs for the program 
element; 
(C) average procurement unit costs and program 
acquisition costs for the program element; and 
(D) an identification when the program joint cost anal-
ysis requirements description document is scheduled to 
be approved. 
(4) A test baseline summarizing the comprehensive test 
program for the program element outlined in the integrated 
master test plan. 
(c) ANNUAL REPORTS ON ACQUISITION BASELINES.— 
(1) ANNUAL REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than February 
15, 2011, and annually thereafter, the Director of the Missile 
Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the acquisition baselines required by 
subsection (a). The first such report shall set forth the acquisi-
tion baselines, and each later report shall identify the signifi-
cant changes or variances, if any, in any such baseline from 
any earlier report under this subsection. 
(2) FORM.—Each report under this subsection shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
(d) ANNUAL REPORTS ON MISSILE DEFENSE EXECUTIVE BOARD 
ACTIVITIES.—The Director shall include in each report under sub-
section (c) a description of the activities of the Missile Defense 
Executive Board during the preceding fiscal year, including the 
following: 
(1) A list of each meeting of the Board during the preceding 
fiscal year. 
(2) The agenda and issues considered at each such meeting. 
(3) A description of any decisions or recommendations made 
by the Board at each such meeting. 
SEC. 226. AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT BALLISTIC MISSILE SHARED EARLY 
WARNING WITH THE CZECH REPUBLIC. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT SHARED EARLY WARNING.—During 
fiscal years 2011 and 2012, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out a program to provide a ballistic missile shared early warning 
capability for the United States and the Czech Republic. 
(b) FISCAL YEAR 2011 FUNDING AUTHORIZATION.— 
(1) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for Operation and 
Maintenance, Air Force, $1,700,000 may be available for the 
purposes described in subsection (a). 
(2) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 
Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2011 for Other Procurement, 
Air Force, $500,000 may be available for the purposes described 
in subsection (a). 
SEC. 227. REPORT ON PHASED, ADAPTIVE APPROACH TO MISSILE 
DEFENSE IN EUROPE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the phased, 
adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A detailed explanation of— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00717
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4172 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) the analytic basis (including the analytic process 
and methodology) that led to the recommendation of the 
Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff to pursue 
the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, 
including the ability to defend deployed forces of the United 
States, allies, and partners in Europe, and the United 
States homeland, against the existing, emerging, and future 
threat from Iranian ballistic missiles in a timely and 
flexible manner; and 
(B) the planned defensive coverage of Europe provided 
by such missile defense. 
(2) A detailed explanation of the specific elements planned 
for each of the four phases of the phased, adaptive approach 
to missile defense in Europe, including schedules and param-
eters of planned deployments of missile defense systems at 
sea and on land, and the knowledge points or milestones that 
will be required prior to operational deployment of those ele-
ments. 
(3) A description of the factors and processes that will 
be used to determine the eventual numbers and locations of 
interceptors that will be deployed at sea and on land, and 
the concept of operations that will enable the phased, adaptive 
approach to missile defense in Europe to be operated in a 
flexible, adaptable, and survivable manner. 
(4) A description of the status of the development or produc-
tion of the various elements of the phased, adaptive approach 
to missile defense in Europe, particularly the development of 
the standard missile-3, block IIA and block IIB interceptors, 
including the technical readiness levels of those systems under 
development and the plans for retiring the technical risks of 
such systems. 
(5) A description of the advances in technology that are 
expected to permit enhanced defensive capability of the phased, 
adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including air-
borne infrared sensor technology, space sensor technology, and 
enhanced battle management, command, control, and commu-
nications. 
(6) A discussion of how the phased, adaptive approach 
to missile defense in Europe will meet the operational needs 
of the commander of the United States European Command, 
and how it relates to plans to use a phased, adaptive approach 
to missile defense in other geographic regions. 
(7) An explanation of— 
(A) the views of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
on the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in 
Europe; and 
(B) how such missile defense fits into the current mis-
sile defense strategy of NATO. 
(c) FORM.—The report shall be in unclassified form, but may 
include a classified annex. 
SEC. 228. INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUND- 
BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 
(a) INDEPENDENT REVIEW
AND ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—The 
Secretary of Defense shall select an appropriate entity outside the 
Department of Defense to conduct an independent review and 
assessment of the ground-based midcourse defense system. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00718
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4173 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The review and assessment required by this 
section shall address the current plans of the Department of Defense 
with respect to the following: 
(1) The force structure and inventory levels necessary for 
the ground-based midcourse defense system to achieve the 
planned capabilities of that system, including an analysis of 
costs and potential advantages of deploying additional oper-
ational ground-based interceptor missiles. 
(2) The number of ground-based interceptor missiles nec-
essary for operational assets, test assets (including develop-
mental and operational test assets and aging and surveillance 
test assets), and spare missiles for the ground-based midcourse 
defense system. 
(3) The plan to maintain the operational effectiveness of 
the ground-based midcourse defense system over the course 
of its service life, including any modernization or capability 
enhancement efforts, and any sustainment efforts. 
(4) The plan for funding the development, production, 
deployment, testing, improvement, and sustainment of the 
ground-based midcourse defense system. 
(5) The plan for flight testing the ground-based midcourse 
defense system, including aging and surveillance tests to dem-
onstrate the continuing effectiveness of the system over the 
course of its service life. 
(6) The plan for production of ground-based interceptor 
missiles necessary for operational test assets, aging and surveil-
lance test assets, and spare missiles for the ground-based mid-
course defense system. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the entity conducting the review and assess-
ment under this section shall submit to the Secretary and the 
congressional defense committees a report containing— 
(1) the results of the review and assessment; and 
(2) any recommendations on how the Department of 
Defense may improve upon its plans to ensure the availability, 
reliability, maintainability, supportability, and improvement of 
the ground-based midcourse defense system. 
SEC. 229. IRON DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE PROGRAM. 
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 201(4) 
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, the 
Secretary of Defense may provide up to $205,000,000 to the govern-
ment of Israel for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system. 
Subtitle D—Reports 
SEC. 231. REPORT ON ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES AND PROGRAM 
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than January 15, 2011, the 
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on the Ground Combat Vehicle program of 
the Army. Such report shall include— 
(1) the results of the analysis of alternatives conducted 
prior to milestone A, including any technical data; and 
Israel. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00719
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4174 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) an explanation of any plans to adjust the requirements 
of the Ground Combat Vehicle program during the technology 
development phase of such program. 
(b) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
(c) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—Of the funds author-
ized to be appropriated by this or any other Act for fiscal year 
2011 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for 
development of the Ground Combat Vehicle, not more than 50 
percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 
days after the date on which the report is submitted under sub-
section (a). 
SEC. 232. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TANK-FIRED MUNI-
TIONS. 
(a) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall conduct 
a cost benefit analysis of future munitions to be fired from 
the M1 Abrams series main battle tank to determine the proper 
investment to be made in tank munitions, including beyond 
line of sight technology. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The cost benefit analysis under paragraph 
(1) shall include— 
(A) the predicted operational performance of future 
tank-fired munitions, including those incorporating beyond 
line of sight technology, based on the relevant modeling 
and simulation of future combat scenarios of the Army, 
including a detailed analysis on the suitability of each 
munition to address the full spectrum of targets across 
the entire range of the tank (including close range, mid- 
range, long-range, and beyond line of sight); 
(B) a detailed assessment of the projected costs to 
develop and field each tank-fired munition included in the 
analysis, including those incorporating beyond line of sight 
technology; and 
(C) a comparative analysis of each tank-fired munition 
included in the analysis, including suitability to address 
known capability gaps and overmatch against known and 
projected threats. 
(3) MUNITIONS INCLUDED.—In conducting the cost benefit 
analysis under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include, at 
a minimum, the Mid-Range Munition, the Advanced Kinetic 
Energy round, and the Advanced Multipurpose Program. 
(b) BRIEFING.—Not later than April 15, 2011, the Secretary 
shall provide a detailed briefing to the congressional defense 
committees on the cost benefit analysis conducted under subsection 
(a). 
SEC. 233. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE VH–(XX) 
PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER ACQUISITION PROGRAM. 
(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—During the period beginning on 
the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 
2013, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct 
an annual review of the VH–(XX) aircraft acquisition program. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of each year 
beginning in 2011 and ending in 2013, the Comptroller General 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00720
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4175 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
on the review of the VH–(XX) aircraft acquisition program 
conducted under subsection (a). 
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report on the review 
of the VH–(XX) aircraft acquisition program shall include the 
following: 
(A) The extent to which the program is meeting 
development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, 
and risk mitigation goals. 
(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial oper-
ational capability and full operational capability dates for 
the VH–(XX) aircraft, the progress and results of— 
(i) developmental and operational testing of the 
aircraft; and 
(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in aircraft 
performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suit-
ability, and safety. 
(C) An assessment of VH–(XX) aircraft procurement 
plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufac-
turing efficiency and supplier performance. 
(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the 
VH–(XX) aircraft, including whether such strategy is in 
compliance with acquisition management best-practices 
and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
(E) A risk assessment of the integrated master 
schedule and the test and evaluation master plan of the 
VH–(XX) aircraft as it relates to— 
(i) the probability of success; 
(ii) the funding required for such aircraft compared 
with the funding programmed; and 
(iii) development and production concurrency. 
(3) ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.—In submitting to the 
congressional defense committees the first report under para-
graph (1) and a report following any changes made by the 
Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the 
VH–(XX) aircraft acquisition program, the Comptroller General 
shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment 
of the sufficiency and objectivity of— 
(A) the analysis of alternatives; 
(B) the initial capabilities document; 
(C) the capabilities development document; and 
(D) the systems requirement document. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS AFFIRMING THE IMPORTANCE OF 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOP-
MENT OF NEXT GENERATION SEMICONDUCTOR TECH-
NOLOGIES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) The next generation of weapons systems, battlefield 
sensors, and intelligence platforms will need to be lighter, more 
agile, consume less power, and have greater computational 
power, which can be achieved by decreasing the feature size 
of integrated circuits to the nanometer scale. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00721
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4176 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) There is a growing concern in the Department of 
Defense and the United States intelligence community over 
the offshore shift in development and production of high 
capacity semiconductors. Greater reliance on providers of semi-
conductors in the United States high technology industry would 
help mitigate the security risks of such an offshore shift. 
(3) The development of new manufacturing technologies 
is recognized in the semiconductor industry as critical to the 
development of the next generation of integrated circuits. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the United States should pursue research and develop-
ment capabilities to take the lead in developing and producing 
the next generation of integrated circuits; and 
(2) the Department of Defense should continue to work 
with industry and academia in pursuing the research and 
development of advanced manufacturing techniques in support 
of the development of the next generation of integrated circuits 
needed for the requirements and specialized applications of 
the Department of Defense. 
SEC. 242. PILOT PROGRAM ON COLLABORATIVE ENERGY SECURITY. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 
with the Secretary of Energy, may carry out a collaborative energy 
security pilot program involving one or more partnerships between 
one military installation and one national laboratory, for the pur-
pose of evaluating and validating secure, salable microgrid compo-
nents and systems for deployment. 
(b) SELECTION OF MILITARY INSTALLATION AND NATIONAL LAB-
ORATORY.—If the Secretary of Defense carries out a pilot program 
under this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
of Energy shall jointly select a military installation and a national 
laboratory for the purpose of carrying out the pilot program. In 
making such selections, the Secretaries shall consider each of the 
following: 
(1) A commitment to participate made by a military 
installation being considered for selection. 
(2) The findings and recommendations of relevant energy 
security assessments of military installations being considered 
for selection. 
(3) The availability of renewable energy sources at a mili-
tary installation being considered for selection. 
(4) Potential synergies between the expertise and capabili-
ties of a national laboratory being considered for selection and 
the infrastructure, interests, or other energy security needs 
of a military installation being considered for selection. 
(5) The effects of any utility tariffs, surcharges, or other 
considerations on the feasibility of enabling any excess elec-
tricity generated on a military installation being considered 
for selection to be sold or otherwise made available to the 
local community near the installation. 
(c) PROGRAM ELEMENTS.—A pilot program under this section 
shall be carried out as follows: 
(1) Under the pilot program, the Secretaries shall evaluate 
and validate the performance of new energy technologies that 
may be incorporated into operating environments. 
(2) The pilot program shall involve collaboration with the 
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability of the 
10 USC 2911 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00722
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4177 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Department of Energy and other offices and agencies within 
the Department of Energy, as appropriate, and the Environ-
mental Security Technical Certification Program of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
(3) Under the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall 
investigate opportunities for any excess electricity created for 
the military installation to be sold or otherwise made available 
to the local community near the installation. 
(4) The Secretary of Defense shall use the results of the 
pilot program as the basis for informing key performance 
parameters and validating energy components and designs that 
could be implemented in various military installations across 
the country and at forward operating bases. 
(5) The pilot program shall support the effort of the Sec-
retary of Defense to use the military as a test bed to dem-
onstrate innovative energy technologies. 
(d) IMPLEMENTATION
AND
DURATION.—If the Secretary of 
Defense carries out a pilot program under this section, such pilot 
program shall begin by not later than July 1, 2011, and shall 
be not less than three years in duration. 
(e) REPORTS.— 
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—If the Secretary of Defense carries 
out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary shall 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees by not later 
than October 1, 2011, an initial report that provides an update 
on the implementation of the pilot program, including an identi-
fication of the selected military installation and national labora-
tory partner and a description of technologies under evaluation. 
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after completion 
of a pilot program under this section, the Secretary shall submit 
to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the 
pilot program, including any findings and recommendations 
of the Secretary. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Science 
and Technology of the House of Representatives; and 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. 
(2) The term ‘‘microgrid’’ means an integrated energy 
system consisting of interconnected loads and distributed 
energy resources (including generators, energy storage devices, 
and smart controls) that can operate with the utility grid or 
in an intentional islanding mode. 
(3) The term ‘‘national laboratory’’ means— 
(A) a national laboratory (as defined in section 2 of 
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801)); or 
(B) a national security laboratory (as defined in section 
3281 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act 
(50 U.S.C. 2471)). 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00723
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4178 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 243. PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION 
FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 
DEFENSE SYSTEMS. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out 
a pilot program to develop and incorporate technology protection 
features in a designated system during the research and develop-
ment phase of such system. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than December 31 of each 
year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot program estab-
lished under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the pilot program, including 
a list of each designated system included in the program. 
(c) TERMINATION.—The pilot program established under this 
section shall terminate on October 1, 2015. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘designated system’’ means any system 
(including a major system, as defined in section 2302(5) of 
title 10, United States Code) that the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics designates 
as being included in the pilot program established under this 
section. 
(2) The term ‘‘technology protection features’’ means the 
technical modifications necessary to protect critical program 
information, including anti-tamper technologies and other sys-
tems engineering activities intended to prevent or delay exploi-
tation of critical technologies in a designated system. 
TITLE III—OPERATION AND 
MAINTENANCE 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 
Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental Provisions 
Sec. 311. Reimbursement of Environmental Protection Agency for certain costs in 
connection with the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. 
Sec. 312. Payment to Environmental Protection Agency of stipulated penalties in 
connection with Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. 
Sec. 313. Requirements related to the investigation of exposure to drinking water 
at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 
Sec. 314. Comptroller General assessment on military environmental exposures. 
Subtitle C—Workplace and Depot Issues 
Sec. 321. Technical amendments to requirement for service contract inventory. 
Sec. 322. Repeal of conditions on expansion of functions performed under prime 
vendor contracts for depot-level maintenance and repair. 
Sec. 323. Prohibition on establishing goals or quotas for conversion of functions to 
performance by Department of Defense civilian employees. 
Subtitle D—Reports 
Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to corrosion prevention 
projects and activities. 
Sec. 332. Modification and repeal of certain reporting requirements. 
Sec. 333. Report on Air Sovereignty Alert mission. 
Sec. 334. Report on the SEAD/DEAD mission requirement for the Air Force. 
Sec. 335. Requirement to update study on strategic seaports. 
Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 
Sec. 341. Permanent authority to accept and use landing fees charged for use of do-
mestic military airfields by civil aircraft. 
Sec. 342. Extension of Arsenal Support Program Initiative. 
10 USC 2358 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00724
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4179 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 343. Limitation on obligation of funds for the Army Human Terrain System. 
Sec. 344. Limitation on obligation of funds pending submission of classified jus-
tification material. 
Sec. 345. Requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory. 
Sec. 346. Commercial sale of small arms ammunition in excess of military require-
ments. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 351. Expedited processing of background investigations for certain individuals. 
Sec. 352. Revision to authorities relating to transportation of civilian passengers 
and commercial cargoes by Department of Defense when space unavail-
able on commercial lines. 
Sec. 353. Technical correction to obsolete reference relating to use of flexible hiring 
authority to facilitate performance of certain Department of Defense 
functions by civilian employees. 
Sec. 354. Authority for payment of full replacement value for loss or damage to 
household goods in limited cases not covered by carrier liability. 
Sec. 355. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property. 
Sec. 356. Operational readiness models. 
Sec. 357. Sense of Congress regarding continued importance of High-Altitude Avia-
tion Training Site, Colorado. 
Sec. 358. Study of effects of new construction of obstructions on military installa-
tions and operations. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $33,921,165,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $38,232,943,000. 
(3) For the Marine Corps, $5,590,340,000. 
(4) For the Air Force, $36,822,516,000. 
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $30,562,619,000. 
(6) For the Army Reserve, $2,879,077,000. 
(7) For the Naval Reserve, $1,367,764,000. 
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $285,234,000. 
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $3,403,827,000. 
(10) For the Army National Guard, $6,621,704,000. 
(11) For the Air National Guard, $6,042,239,000. 
(12) For the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed 
Forces, $14,068,000. 
(13) For the Acquisition Development Workforce Fund, 
$217,561,000. 
(14) For Environmental Restoration, Army, $444,581,000. 
(15) For Environmental Restoration, Navy, $304,867,000. 
(16) 
For 
Environmental 
Restoration, 
Air 
Force, 
$502,653,000. 
(17) 
For 
Environmental 
Restoration, 
Defense-wide, 
$10,744,000. 
(18) For Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used 
Defense Sites, $296,546,000. 
(19) For Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid 
programs, $108,032,000. 
(20) 
For 
Cooperative 
Threat 
Reduction 
programs, 
$522,512,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00725
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4180 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle B—Energy and Environmental 
Provisions 
SEC. 
311. 
REIMBURSEMENT 
OF 
ENVIRONMENTAL 
PROTECTION 
AGENCY FOR CERTAIN COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE 
TWIN CITIES ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT, MINNESOTA. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO REIMBURSE.— 
(1) TRANSFER
AMOUNT.—Using funds described in sub-
section (b) and notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Defense may transfer not more 
than $5,611,670.67 in fiscal year 2011 to the Hazardous Sub-
stance Superfund. 
(2) PURPOSE OF REIMBURSEMENT.—The amount authorized 
to be transferred under paragraph (1) is to reimburse the 
Environmental Protection Agency for costs the Agency incurred 
relating to the response actions performed at the Twin Cities 
Army Ammunition Plant, Minnesota. 
(3) 
INTERAGENCY
AGREEMENT.—The 
reimbursement 
described in paragraph (2) is intended to satisfy certain terms 
of the interagency agreement entered into by the Department 
of the Army and the Environmental Protection Agency for 
the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant that took effect in 
December 1987 and that provided for the recovery of expenses 
by the Agency from the Department of the Army. 
(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The transfer of funds authorized in 
subsection (a) shall be made using funds authorized to be appro-
priated for fiscal year 2011 for operation and maintenance for 
Environmental Restoration, Army. 
SEC. 312. PAYMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OF 
STIPULATED PENALTIES IN CONNECTION WITH NAVAL AIR 
STATION, BRUNSWICK, MAINE. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS.—From amounts authorized 
to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for the Department of 
Defense Base Closure Account 2005, and notwithstanding section 
2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense 
may transfer an amount of not more than $153,000 to the Haz-
ardous Substance Superfund established under subchapter A of 
chapter 98 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 
(b) PURPOSE OF TRANSFER.—The purpose of a transfer made 
under subsection (a) is to satisfy a stipulated penalty assessed 
by the Environmental Protection Agency on June 12, 2008, against 
Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine, for the failure of the Navy 
to sample certain monitoring wells in a timely manner pursuant 
to a schedule included in the Federal facility agreement for Naval 
Air Station, Brunswick, which was entered into by the Secretary 
of the Navy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency on October 19, 1990. 
(c) ACCEPTANCE
OF PAYMENT.—If the Secretary of Defense 
makes a transfer authorized under subsection (a), the Administrator 
of the Environmental Protection Agency shall accept the amount 
transferred as payment in full of the penalty referred to in sub-
section (b). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00726
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4181 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 313. REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE INVESTIGATION OF EXPO-
SURE TO DRINKING WATER AT CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH 
CAROLINA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) The Department of the Navy and the Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry (hereinafter in this section 
referred to as ‘‘ATSDR’’) have been working together for almost 
two decades to identify the possible effects of exposure to 
contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. 
(2) Multiple studies have been conducted, and are being 
conducted, which require significant amounts of data and 
historical documentation, requiring the Department of the Navy 
and ATSDR to have close collaboration and open access to 
information. 
(3) In June 2010, the Department of the Navy and ATSDR 
established 
the 
Camp 
Lejeune 
Data 
Mining 
Technical 
Workgroup to identify and inventory information and data rel-
evant to the ongoing scientific research. 
(b) REQUIREMENTS.— 
(1) ATSDR ACCESS TO DATA.—By not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of the Navy shall ensure that the inventory created by the 
Camp Lejeune Data Mining Technical Workgroup is accurate 
and complete and that ATSDR has full access to all of the 
documents and data listed therein as needed. 
(2) AVAILABILITY OF NEW AND NEWLY DISCOVERED DOCU-
MENTS.—If after the date of enactment of this Act the Secretary 
of the Navy generates any new document, record, or electronic 
data, or comes into possession of any existing document, record, 
or electronic data not previously provided in the Camp Lejeune 
Data Mining Technical Workgroup, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall make such information immediately available to ATSDR 
with an electronic inventory incorporating the newly located 
or generated document, record, or electronic data. 
(3) LIMITATION ON ADJUDICATION OF CLAIMS.—None of the 
funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 
2011 may be used to adjudicate any administrative claim filed 
with the Department of the Navy regarding water contamina-
tion at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, until at least 45 days 
after the date on which the Secretary of the Navy notifies 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 
of Representatives of the intention of the Secretary to adju-
dicate the claim. 
SEC. 314. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT ON MILITARY 
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) There have been various reports of the exposure of 
current and former members of the Armed Forces, their depend-
ents, and civilian employees to environmental hazards while 
living and working on military installations. 
(2) There is the need to better understand existing Depart-
ment of Defense policies and procedures for addressing possible 
environmental exposures at military installations, determining 
any correlation between such an exposure and a subsequent 
health condition, and handling claims and potential compensa-
tion. 
Deadline. 
Notification. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00727
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4182 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) While many of these possible exposures have been 
studied and evaluated, the extent to which those exposures 
caused or contributed to the short- and long-term health condi-
tions of current and former members of the Armed Forces, 
their dependents, and civilian employees remains largely 
unknown. 
(4) As for these possible exposures and the link between 
the exposure and subsequent health conditions, there may be 
better ways for the Federal Government to evaluate, address 
and, as warranted, provide health benefits or possible com-
pensation as a remedy to these potential exposures. 
(b) COMPTROLLER
GENERAL
ASSESSMENT
REQUIRED.—The 
Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out an assess-
ment of possible exposures to environmental hazards on military 
installations that includes the following: 
(1) An identification of the policies and processes by which 
the Department of Defense and the military departments 
respond to environmental hazards on military installations and 
possible exposures and determine if there is a standard frame-
work. 
(2) An identification of the existing processes available 
to current and former members of the Armed Forces, their 
dependents, and civilian employees to seek compensation and 
health benefits for exposures to environmental hazards on mili-
tary installations. 
(3) A comparison of the processes identified under para-
graph (2) with other potential options or methods for providing 
health benefits or compensation to individuals for injuries that 
may have resulted from environmental hazards on military 
installations. 
(4) An examination of what is known about the advantages 
and disadvantages of other potential options or methods as 
well as any shortfalls in the current processes. 
(5) Recommendations for any administrative or legislative 
action that the Comptroller General deems appropriate in the 
context of the assessment. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than January 1, 2012, the Comptroller 
General shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report on the findings and recommendations, 
as appropriate, of the Comptroller General with respect to the 
assessment conducted under subsection (b). 
(d) COORDINATION.—In carrying out subsection (b), the Comp-
troller General shall receive comments from the Secretary of 
Defense and others, as appropriate. 
(e) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be interpreted 
to impede, encroach, or delay— 
(1) any studies, reviews, or assessments of any actual or 
potential environmental exposures at any military installation, 
including the studies included in the Agency for Toxic Sub-
stances and Disease Registry’s Annual Plan of Work regarding 
the water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina; 
(2) the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s 
statutory obligations, including its obligations under the Com-
prehensive 
Environmental 
Response, 
Compensation, 
and 
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) regarding Super-
fund sites; or 
Comments. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00728
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4183 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) the remediation of any environmental contamination 
or hazard at any military installation. 
(f) MILITARY INSTALLATION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘military installation’’ has the meaning given that term in section 
2801(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code. 
Subtitle C—Workplace and Depot Issues 
SEC. 321. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENT FOR SERVICE 
CONTRACT INVENTORY. 
Section 2330a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 
(2) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph 
(A)— 
(A) by striking the second sentence; 
(B) by inserting after the first sentence the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The guidance for compiling the inventory 
shall be issued by the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Personnel and Readiness, the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), and the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, as follows:’’; and 
(C) by inserting after the sentence added by subpara-
graph (B) the following: 
‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness, as supported by the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), shall be responsible for developing guidance for— 
‘‘(i) the collection of data regarding functions and mis-
sions performed by contractors in a manner that is com-
parable to the manpower data elements used in inventories 
of 
functions 
performed 
by 
Department 
of 
Defense 
employees; and 
‘‘(ii) the calculation of contractor manpower equivalents 
in a manner that is comparable to the calculation of full- 
time equivalents for use in inventories of functions per-
formed by Department of Defense employees. 
‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics shall be responsible for developing guid-
ance on other data elements and implementing procedures.’’; 
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), 
as added by paragraph (2), the following: 
‘‘(2) The entry for an activity on an inventory under this sub-
section shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such entry, 
the following:’’; and 
(4) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (3), 
by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following new 
subparagraph (E): 
‘‘(E) The number of contractor employees, expressed as 
full-time equivalents for direct labor, using direct labor hours 
and associated cost data collected from contractors (except that 
estimates may be used where such data is not available and 
cannot reasonably be made available in a timely manner for 
the purpose of the inventory).’’. 
Guidance. 
Guidance. 
Guidance. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00729
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4184 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 322. REPEAL OF CONDITIONS ON EXPANSION OF FUNCTIONS PER-
FORMED UNDER PRIME VENDOR CONTRACTS FOR DEPOT- 
LEVEL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. 
Section 346 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 112 
Stat. 1979; 10 U.S.C. 2464 note) is repealed. 
SEC. 323. PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHING GOALS OR QUOTAS FOR 
CONVERSION 
OF 
FUNCTIONS 
TO 
PERFORMANCE 
BY 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 
(a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of Defense may not establish, 
apply, or enforce any numerical goal, target, or quota for the conver-
sion of Department of Defense functions to performance by Depart-
ment of Defense civilian employees, unless such goal, target, or 
quota is based on considered research and analysis, as required 
by section 235, 2330a, or 2463 of title 10, United States Code. 
(b) DECISIONS
TO INSOURCE.—In deciding which functions 
should be converted to performance by Department of Defense 
civilian employees pursuant to section 2463 of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall use the costing method-
ology outlined in the Directive-Type Memorandum 09–007 (Esti-
mating and Comparing the Full Costs of Civilian and Military 
Manpower and Contractor Support) or any successor guidance for 
the determination of costs when costs are the sole basis for the 
decision. The Secretary of a military department may issue supple-
mental guidance to assist in such decisions affecting functions of 
that military department. 
(c) REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March 31, 2011, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the decisions with respect to 
the conversion of functions to performance by Department of 
Defense civilian employees made during fiscal year 2010. Such 
report shall identify, for each such decision— 
(A) the agency or service of the Department involved 
in the decision; 
(B) the basis and rationale for the decision; and 
(C) the number of contractor employees whose func-
tions were converted to performance by Department of 
Defense civilian employees. 
(2) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.—Not later than 120 
days after the submittal of the report under paragraph (1), 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the 
report. 
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be con-
strued— 
(1) to preclude the Secretary of Defense from establishing, 
applying, and enforcing goals for the conversion of acquisition 
functions and other critical functions to performance by Depart-
ment of Defense civilian employees, where such goals are based 
on considered research and analysis; or 
(2) to require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a cost 
comparison before making a decision to convert any acquisition 
function or other critical function to performance by Depart-
ment of Defense civilian employees, where factors other than 
cost serve as a basis for the Secretary’s decision. 
10 USC 2463 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00730
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4185 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle D—Reports 
SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 
CORROSION PREVENTION PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. 
Section 2228(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘The’’ and 
inserting ‘‘For the fiscal year covered by the report and 
the preceding fiscal year, the’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(E) For the fiscal year covered by the report and the 
preceding fiscal year, the amount of funds requested in the 
budget for each project or activity described in subsection (d) 
compared to the funding requirements for the project or 
activity.’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ‘‘, including the annex to the report 
described in paragraph (3)’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) Each report under this section shall include, in an annex 
to the report, a copy of the annual corrosion report most recently 
submitted by the corrosion control and prevention executive of 
each military department under section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan 
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4567; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note).’’. 
SEC. 332. MODIFICATION AND REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING 
REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) PRIORITIZATION OF FUNDS.—Subsection (a) of section 323 
of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the global war on ter-
rorism’’ and inserting ‘‘overseas contingency operations’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘units trans-
forming to modularity’’ and inserting ‘‘modular units’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2012’’ and 
inserting ‘‘2015’’. 
(b) BUDGET INFORMATION.—Subsection (b) of such section is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘the global war on terrorism’’ and 
inserting ‘‘overseas contingency operations’’; and 
(ii) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘units transforming 
to modularity’’ and inserting ‘‘modular units’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end and inserting 
a period; and 
(C) by striking subparagraph (C); and 
(2) by striking paragraph (3). 
(c) ANNUAL REPORT
ON ARMY PROGRESS.—Subsection (c) of 
such section is amended— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00731
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4186 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) by striking paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), and 
(7); 
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (8) and (9) as subpara-
graphs (D) and (F), respectively; 
(3) by submitting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘On the date’’; 
(4) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (3) of 
this subsection, by striking ‘‘in meeting’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘shall be itemized’’ and inserting ‘‘in fulfilling the 
key enabler equipment requirements of modular units and in 
repairing, recapitalizing, and replacing equipment and materiel 
used in support of overseas contingency operations underway 
as of the date of such report, and associated sustainment. 
Any information included in the report shall be itemized’’; 
(5) by striking ‘‘Each such report’’ and all that follows 
through the colon and inserting the following: 
‘‘(2) Each such report shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) An assessment of the key enabler equipment and 
personnel of the Army, including— 
‘‘(i) a comparison of— 
‘‘(I) the authorized level of key enabler equipment; 
‘‘(II) the level of key enabler equipment on hand; 
and 
‘‘(III) the planned purchases of key enabler equip-
ment as set forth in the future-years defense program 
submitted with the budget for such fiscal year; 
‘‘(ii) a comparison of the authorized and actual per-
sonnel levels for personnel with key enabler personnel 
specialities with the requirements for key enabler personnel 
specialties; 
‘‘(iii) an identification of any shortfalls indicated by 
the comparisons in clauses (i) and (ii); and 
‘‘(iv) an assessment of the number and type of key 
enabler equipment that the Army projects it will have 
on hand by the end of such future-years defense program 
that will require repair, recapitalization, or replacement 
at or before the end of the time period covered by such 
future-years defense program (which assessment shall 
account for additional repair, recapitalization, or replace-
ment resulting from use of key enabler equipment in over-
seas contingency operations). 
‘‘(B) If an assessment under subparagraph (A) identifies 
shortfalls that will exist within the period covered by the future- 
years defense program submitted in such fiscal year, an identi-
fication of the risks associated with such shortfalls and mitiga-
tion strategies to address such risks. 
‘‘(C) A schedule for the accomplishment of the purposes 
set forth in paragraph (1).’’; 
(6) in paragraph (2), as amended by paragraphs (2) and 
(5) of this subsection, by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) A description of the status of the development of 
doctrine on how modular combat, functional, and support forces 
will train, be sustained, and fight.’’; and 
(7) in subparagraph (F) of paragraph (2) as redesignated 
by paragraphs (2) and (5) of this subsection, by striking ‘‘para-
graphs (1) through (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (A) 
through (E)’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00732
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4187 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(d) ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL ON ARMY PROGRESS.—Sub-
section (d) of such section is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(d) ANNUAL
COMPTROLLER
GENERAL
REPORT
ON
ARMY 
PROGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the 
Secretary of the Army submits a report under subsection (c), the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting forth the Comp-
troller General’s review of such report. Each report under this 
subsection shall include such information and recommendations 
as the Comptroller General considers appropriate in light of such 
review.’’. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—Such section is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (d), as amended by sub-
section (d) of this section, the following new subsection (e): 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘contingency operation’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘key enabler’, in the case of equipment or 
personnel, means equipment or personnel, as the case may 
be, that make a modular force or unit as capable or more 
capable than the non-modular force or unit it replaced, 
including the following: 
‘‘(A) Equipment such as tactical and high frequency 
radio, tactical wheeled vehicles, battle command systems, 
unmanned aerial vehicles, all-source analysis systems, 
analysis and control elements, fire support sensor systems, 
firefinder radar, joint network nodes, long-range advanced 
scout surveillance systems, Trojan Spirit systems (or any 
successor system), and any other equipment items identi-
fied by the Army as making a modular force or unit as 
capable or more capable than the non-modular force or 
unit it replaced. 
‘‘(B) Personnel in specialties needed to operate or sup-
port the equipment specified in subparagraph (A) and per-
sonnel in specialties relating to civil affairs, communication 
and information systems operation, explosive ordinance dis-
posal, military intelligence, psychological operations, and 
any other personnel specialties identified by the Army as 
making a modular force or unit as capable or more capable 
than the non-modular force or unit it replaced.’’. 
(f) TERMINATION OF REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Subsection (f) of 
such section, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) of this section, 
is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’ and inserting 
‘‘fiscal year 2015’’. 
(g) REPEAL OF REPORT ON DISPOSITION OF RESERVE EQUIP-
MENT.—Title III of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended by 
striking section 349. 
(h) REPEAL OF REPORT ON READINESS OF GROUND FORCES.— 
Title III of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended by striking section 355. 
SEC. 333. REPORT ON AIR SOVEREIGNTY ALERT MISSION. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the 
Commander of the United States Northern Command and the North 
122 Stat. 73. 
120 Stat. 2159. 
10 USC 229 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00733
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4188 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
American Aerospace Defense Command shall submit to the Commit-
tees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives 
a report on the Air Sovereignty Alert (hereinafter in this section 
referred to as ‘‘ASA’’) mission and Operation Noble Eagle. 
(b) CONSULTATION.—The Commander shall consult with the 
Director of the National Guard Bureau who shall review and provide 
independent analysis and comments on the report required under 
subsection (a). 
(c) CONTENTS
OF REPORT.—The report required under sub-
section (a) shall include each of the following: 
(1) An evaluation of the ASA mission and of Operation 
Noble Eagle. 
(2) An evaluation of each of the following: 
(A) The current ability to perform the ASA mission 
with respect to training, equipment, and basing. 
(B) Any current deficiencies in the ASA mission. 
(C) Any changes in threats that would require any 
change in training, equipment, and basing to effectively 
support the ASA mission. 
(D) An evaluation of whether the ASA mission is fully 
resourced with respect to funding, personnel, and aircraft. 
(E) A description of the coverage of ASA and Operation 
Noble Eagle units with respect to— 
(i) population centers covered; and 
(ii) targets of value covered, including symbolic 
(including national monuments, sports venues, and 
centers of commerce), critical infrastructure (including 
power plants, ports, dams, bridges, and telecommuni-
cation nodes), and national security (including military 
bases and organs of government) targets. 
(F) An unclassified, notional area of responsibility con-
forming to the unclassified response time of the unit rep-
resented graphically on a map and detailing the total popu-
lation and number of targets of value covered, as described 
in subparagraph (E). 
(3) The status of the implementation of the recommenda-
tions made in the Government Accountability Office report 
entitled ‘‘Actions Needed to Improve Management of Air Sov-
ereignty Alert Operations to Protect U.S. Airspace’’ (GAO–09– 
184). 
(d) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) 
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
annex. 
SEC. 334. REPORT ON THE SEAD/DEAD MISSION REQUIREMENT FOR 
THE AIR FORCE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall 
submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and 
the Committee on Armed Service of the House of Representatives 
a report describing the feasibility and desirability of designating 
the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses/Destruction of Enemy Air 
Defenses (hereinafter in this section referred to as ‘‘SEAD/DEAD’’) 
mission as a responsibility of the Air National Guard. 
(b) CONTENTS
OF REPORT.—The report required under sub-
section (a) shall include each of the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00734
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4189 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) An evaluation of the SEAD/DEAD mission, as in effect 
on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) An evaluation of the following with respect to the SEAD/ 
DEAD mission: 
(A) The current ability of the Air National Guard to 
perform the mission with regards to training, equipment, 
funding, and basing. 
(B) Any current deficiencies of the Air National Guard 
to perform the mission, including range infrastructure or 
other improvements needed to support peacetime training 
and readiness. 
(C) The corrective actions and costs required to address 
any deficiencies described in subparagraph (B). 
(c) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall consult 
with the Director of the National Guard Bureau who shall review 
and provide independent analysis and comments on the report 
required under subsection (a). 
SEC. 335. REQUIREMENT TO UPDATE STUDY ON STRATEGIC SEAPORTS. 
The Commander of the United States Transportation Command 
shall update the study entitled ‘‘PORT LOOK 2008 Strategic Sea-
ports Study’’. In updating the study under this section, the Com-
mander shall consider the infrastructure in the vicinity of a strategic 
port, including bridges, roads, and rail, and any issues relating 
to the capacity and condition of such infrastructure. 
Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of 
Authority 
SEC. 341. PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT AND USE LANDING 
FEES CHARGED FOR USE OF DOMESTIC MILITARY AIR-
FIELDS BY CIVIL AIRCRAFT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2697. Acceptance and use of landing fees charged for use 
of domestic military airfields by civil aircraft 
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of a military department may 
impose landing fees for the use by civil aircraft of domestic military 
airfields under the jurisdiction of that Secretary and may use any 
fees received under this section as a source of funding for the 
operation and maintenance of airfields of that department. 
‘‘(b) UNIFORM LANDING FEES.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
prescribe the amount of the landing fees that may be imposed 
under this section. Such fees shall be uniform among the military 
departments. 
‘‘(c) USE OF PROCEEDS.—Amounts received for a fiscal year 
in payment of landing fees imposed under this section for the 
use of a military airfield shall be credited to the appropriation 
that is available for that fiscal year for the operation and mainte-
nance of that military airfield, shall be merged with amounts in 
the appropriation to which credited, and shall be available for 
that military airfield for the same period and purposes as the 
appropriation is available. 
‘‘(d) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of a military department shall 
determine whether consideration for a landing fee has been received 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00735
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4190 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
in a lease, license, or other real estate agreement for an airfield 
and shall use such a determination to offset appropriate amounts 
imposed under subsection (a) for that airfield.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item: 
‘‘2697. Acceptance and use of landing fees charged for use of domestic military air-
fields by civil aircraft.’’. 
SEC. 342. EXTENSION OF ARSENAL SUPPORT PROGRAM INITIATIVE. 
Section 343 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398; 10 U.S.C. 
4551 note), as amended by section 341 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 69) and section 354 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2264), 
is further amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 
‘‘2012’’; and 
(2) in subsection (g)(1), by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting 
‘‘2012’’. 
SEC. 343. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS FOR THE ARMY 
HUMAN TERRAIN SYSTEM. 
(a) LIMITATION.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
for the Human Terrain System (hereinafter in this section referred 
to as the ‘‘HTS’’) that are described in subsection (b), not more 
than 85 percent of the amounts remaining unobligated as of the 
date of enactment of this Act may be obligated until the Secretary 
of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees each 
of the following: 
(1) A validation of all HTS requirements, including any 
prior joint urgent operational needs statements. 
(2) A certification that policies, procedures, and guidance 
are in place to protect the integrity of social science researchers 
participating in HTS, including ethical guidelines and human 
studies research procedures. 
(b) 
COVERED
AUTHORIZATIONS
OR
APPROPRIATIONS.—The 
amounts authorized to be appropriated described in this subsection 
are amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011, 
including such amounts authorized to be appropriated for oversees 
contingency operations, for— 
(1) operation and maintenance for HTS; 
(2) procurement for Mapping the Human Terrain hardware 
and software; and 
(3) research, development, test, and evaluation for Mapping 
the Human Terrain hardware and software. 
SEC. 344. LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS PENDING SUBMIS-
SION OF CLASSIFIED JUSTIFICATION MATERIAL. 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this title 
for fiscal year 2011 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, 
of the amount that corresponds with budget activity four, line 
270, in the budget transmitted to Congress by the President for 
fiscal year 2011, not more than 90 percent may be obligated until 
15 days after the information cited in the classified annex accom-
panying this Act relating to the provision of classified justification 
Time period. 
Certification. 
10 USC 4551 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00736
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4191 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
material to Congress is provided to the congressional defense 
committees. 
SEC. 345. REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFERRING AIRCRAFT WITHIN THE 
AIR FORCE INVENTORY. 
(a) REQUIREMENTS.—In proposing the transfer of ownership 
of any aircraft from ownership by a reserve component of the 
Air Force to ownership by a regular component of the Air Force, 
including such a transfer to be made on a temporary basis, the 
Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that a written agreement 
regarding such transfer of ownership has been entered into between 
the Director of the Air National Guard, the Commander of the 
Air Force Reserve Command, and the Chief of Staff of the Air 
Force. Any such agreement shall specify each of the following: 
(1) The number of and type of aircraft to be transferred. 
(2) In the case of any aircraft transferred on a temporary 
basis— 
(A) the schedule under which the aircraft will be 
returned to the ownership of the reserve component; 
(B) a description of the condition, including the esti-
mated remaining service life, in which any such aircraft 
will be returned to the reserve component; and 
(C) a description of the allocation of resources, 
including the designation of responsibility for funding air-
craft operation and maintenance and a detailed description 
of budgetary responsibilities, for the period for which the 
ownership of the aircraft is transferred to the regular 
component. 
(3) The designation of responsibility for funding depot 
maintenance requirements or modifications to the aircraft gen-
erated as a result of the transfer, including any such require-
ments and modifications required during the period for which 
the ownership of the aircraft is transferred to the regular 
component. 
(4) Any location from which the aircraft will be transferred. 
(5) The effects on manpower that such a transfer may 
have at any facility identified under paragraph (4). 
(6) The effects on the skills and proficiencies of the reserve 
component personnel affected by the transfer. 
(7) Any other items the Director of the Air National Guard 
or the Commander of the Air Force Reserve Command deter-
mines are necessary in order to execute such a transfer. 
(b) SUBMITTAL OF AGREEMENTS TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary 
of the Air Force may not take any action to transfer the ownership 
of an aircraft as described in subsection (a) until the Secretary 
submits to the congressional defense committees an agreement 
entered into pursuant to such subsection regarding the transfer 
of ownership of the aircraft. 
SEC. 346. COMMERCIAL SALE OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION IN EXCESS 
OF MILITARY REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) COMMERCIAL SALE OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION.—Small 
arms ammunition and ammunition components in excess of military 
requirements, including fired cartridge cases, which are not other-
wise prohibited from commercial sale or certified by the Secretary 
of Defense as unserviceable or unsafe, may not be demilitarized 
or destroyed and shall be made available for commercial sale. 
10 USC 2576 
note. 
Contracts. 
10 USC 8062 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00737
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4192 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) DEADLINE FOR GUIDANCE.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall issue guidance to ensure compliance with subsection (a). Not 
later than 15 days after issuing such guidance, the Secretary shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a letter of compli-
ance providing notice of such guidance. 
(c) PREFERENCE.—No small arms ammunition and ammunition 
components in excess of military requirements may be made avail-
able for commercial sale under this section before such ammunition 
and ammunition components are offered for transfer or purchase, 
as authorized by law, to another Federal department or agency 
or for sale to State and local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland 
security, and emergency management agencies pursuant to section 
2576 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this Act. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 351. EXPEDITED PROCESSING OF BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS 
FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS. 
(a) EXPEDITED PROCESSING OF SECURITY CLEARANCES.—Section 
1564 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following 
new subsection (a): 
‘‘(a) EXPEDITED PROCESS.—The Secretary of Defense may pre-
scribe a process for expediting the completion of the background 
investigations necessary for granting security clearances for— 
‘‘(1) Department of Defense personnel and Department of 
Defense contractor personnel who are engaged in sensitive 
duties that are critical to the national security; and 
‘‘(2) any individual who— 
‘‘(A) submits an application for a position as an 
employee of the Department of Defense for which— 
‘‘(i) the individual is qualified; and 
‘‘(ii) a security clearance is required; and 
‘‘(B) is— 
‘‘(i) a member of the armed forces who was retired 
or separated, or is expected to be retired or separated, 
for physical disability pursuant to chapter 61 of this 
title; 
‘‘(ii) the spouse of a member of the armed forces 
who retires or is separated, after the date of the enact-
ment of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2011, for a physical disability 
as a result of a wound, injuries or illness incurred 
or aggravated in the line of duty (as determined by 
the Secretary concerned); or 
‘‘(iii) the spouse of a member of the armed forces 
who dies, after the date of the enactment of the Ike 
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2011, as a result of a wound, injury, or illness 
incurred or aggravated in the line of duty (as deter-
mined by the Secretary concerned).’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(f) USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS.—The Secretary of Defense 
may use funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department 
of Defense for operation and maintenance to conduct background 
Notice. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00738
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4193 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
investigations under this section for individuals described in sub-
section (a)(2).’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall apply with respect to a background investigation conducted 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 352. REVISION TO AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION 
OF CIVILIAN PASSENGERS AND COMMERCIAL CARGOES 
BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WHEN SPACE UNAVAIL-
ABLE ON COMMERCIAL LINES. 
(a) TRANSPORTATION ON DOD VEHICLES AND AIRCRAFT.—Sub-
section (a) of section 2649 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘AUTHORITY.—’’ before ‘‘Whenever’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘, vehicles, or aircraft’’ in the first sentence 
after ‘‘vessels’’ both places it appears. 
(b) AMOUNTS CHARGED FOR TRANSPORTATION IN EMERGENCY, 
DISASTER, OR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE CASES.— 
(1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNTS CHARGED.—The second sen-
tence of subsection (a) of such section is amended by inserting 
before the period the following: ‘‘, except that in the case of 
transportation provided in response to an emergency, a disaster, 
or a request for humanitarian assistance, any amount charged 
for such transportation may not exceed the cost of providing 
the transportation’’. 
(2) CREDITING OF RECEIPTS.—Subsection (b) of such section 
is amended by striking ‘‘Amounts’’ and inserting ‘‘CREDITING 
OF RECEIPTS.—Any amount received under this section with 
respect to transportation provided in response to an emergency, 
a disaster, or a request for humanitarian assistance may be 
credited to the appropriation, fund, or account used in incurring 
the obligation for which such amount is received. In all other 
cases, amounts’’. 
(c) TRANSPORTATION
DURING
CONTINGENCIES
OR
DISASTER 
RESPONSES.—Such section is further amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) TRANSPORTATION OF ALLIED PERSONNEL DURING CONTIN-
GENCIES OR DISASTER RESPONSES.—During the 5-year period begin-
ning on the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, when space is 
available on vessels, vehicles, or aircraft operated by the Depart-
ment of Defense and the Secretary of Defense determines that 
operations in the area of a contingency operation or disaster 
response would be facilitated if allied forces or civilians were to 
be transported using such vessels, vehicles, or aircraft, the Secretary 
may provide such transportation on a noninterference basis, without 
charge.’’. 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2648 of such title is 
amended by inserting ‘‘, vehicles, or aircraft’’ after ‘‘vessels’’ in 
the matter preceding paragraph (1). 
(e) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) The heading of section 2648 of such title is amended 
to read as follows: 
10 USC 1564 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00739
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4194 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘§ 2648. Persons and supplies: sea, land, and air transpor-
tation’’. 
(2) The heading of section 2649 of such title is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2649. 
Civilian 
passengers 
and 
commercial 
cargoes: 
transportation on Department of Defense vessels, 
vehicles, and aircraft’’. 
(f) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the items 
relating to sections 2648 and 2649 and inserting the following 
new items: 
‘‘2648. Persons and supplies: sea, land, and air transportation. 
‘‘2649. Civilian passengers and commercial cargoes: transportation on Department 
of Defense vessels, vehicles, and aircraft.’’. 
SEC. 353. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO OBSOLETE REFERENCE 
RELATING TO USE OF FLEXIBLE HIRING AUTHORITY TO 
FACILITATE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE FUNCTIONS BY CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 
Section 2463(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘under the National Security Personnel System, as 
established’’. 
SEC. 354. AUTHORITY FOR PAYMENT OF FULL REPLACEMENT VALUE 
FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO HOUSEHOLD GOODS IN LIMITED 
CASES NOT COVERED BY CARRIER LIABILITY. 
(a) CLAIMS AUTHORITY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 163 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 2740. Property loss: reimbursement of members and 
civilian employees for full replacement value of 
household effects when contractor reimbursement 
not available 
‘‘The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military 
departments, in paying a claim under section 3721 of title 31 
arising from loss or damage to household goods stored or trans-
ported at the expense of the Department of Defense, may pay 
the claim on the basis of full replacement value in any of the 
following cases in which reimbursement for the full replacement 
value for the loss or damage is not available directly from a carrier 
under section 2636a of this title: 
‘‘(1) A case in which— 
‘‘(A) the lost or damaged goods were stored or trans-
ported under a contract, tender, or solicitation in accord-
ance with section 2636a of this title that requires the 
transportation service provider to settle claims on the basis 
of full replacement value; and 
‘‘(B) the loss or damage occurred under circumstances 
that exclude the transportation service provider from 
liability. 
‘‘(2) A case in which— 
‘‘(A) the loss or damage occurred while the lost or 
damaged goods were in the possession of an ocean carrier 
that was transporting, loading, or unloading the goods 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00740
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4195 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
under a Department of Defense contract for ocean carriage; 
and 
‘‘(B) the land-based portions of the transportation were 
under contracts, in accordance with section 2636a of this 
title, that require the land carriers to settle claims on 
the basis of full replacement value. 
‘‘(3) A case in which— 
‘‘(A) the lost or damaged goods were transported or 
stored under a contract or solicitation that requires at 
least one of the transportation service providers or carriers 
that handled the shipment to settle claims on the basis 
of full replacement value pursuant to section 2636a of 
this title; 
‘‘(B) the lost or damaged goods have been in the custody 
of more than one independent contractor or transportation 
service provider; and 
‘‘(C) a claim submitted to the delivering transportation 
service provider or carrier is denied in whole or in part 
because the loss or damage occurred while the lost or 
damaged goods were in the custody of a prior transportation 
service provider or carrier or government entity.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item: 
‘‘2740. Property loss: reimbursement of members and civilian employees for full re-
placement value of household effects when contractor reimbursement 
not available.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 2740 of title 10, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to losses 
incurred after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 355. RECOVERY OF IMPROPERLY DISPOSED OF DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE PROPERTY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 165 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2790. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of 
Defense property 
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No member of the armed forces, civilian 
employee of the United States Government, contractor personnel, 
or other person may sell, lend, pledge, barter, or give any clothing, 
arms, articles, equipment, or other military or Department of 
Defense property except in accordance with the statutes and regula-
tions governing Government property. 
‘‘(b) TRANSFER OF TITLE OR INTEREST INEFFECTIVE.—If property 
has been disposed of in violation of subsection (a), the person 
holding the property has no right or title to, or interest in, the 
property. 
‘‘(c) AUTHORITY FOR SEIZURE OF IMPROPERLY DISPOSED OF PROP-
ERTY.—If any person is in the possession of military or Department 
of Defense property without right or title to, or interest in, the 
property because it has been disposed of in material violation of 
subsection (a), any Federal, State, or local law enforcement official 
may seize the property wherever found. Unless an exception to 
the warrant requirement under the fourth amendment to the Con-
stitution applies, seizure may be made only— 
‘‘(1) pursuant to— 
10 USC 2740 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00741
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4196 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(A) a warrant issued by the district court of the United 
States for the district in which the property is located, 
or for the district in which the person in possession of 
the property resides or is subject to service; or 
‘‘(B) pursuant to an order by such court, issued after 
a determination of improper transfer under subsection (e); 
and 
‘‘(2) after such a court has issued such a warrant or order. 
‘‘(d) INAPPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN PROPERTY.—Subsections (b) 
and (c) shall not apply to— 
‘‘(1) property on public display by public or private collectors 
or museums in secured exhibits; or 
‘‘(2) property in the collection of any museum or veterans 
organization or held in a private collection for the purpose 
of public display, provided that any such property, the posses-
sion of which could undermine national security or create a 
hazard to public health or safety, has been fully demilitarized. 
‘‘(e) DETERMINATIONS OF VIOLATIONS.—(1) The district court 
of the United States for the district in which the property is located, 
or the district in which the person in possession of the property 
resides or is subject to service, shall have jurisdiction, regardless 
of the current approximated or estimated value of the property, 
to determine whether property was disposed of in violation of sub-
section (a). Any such determination shall be by a preponderance 
of the evidence. 
‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), in the case of property, 
the possession of which could undermine national security or create 
a hazard to public health or safety, the determination under para-
graph (1) may be made after the seizure of the property, as long 
as the United States files an action seeking such determination 
within 90 days after seizure of the property. If the person from 
whom the property is seized is found to have been lawfully in 
possession of the property and the return of the property could 
undermine national security or create a hazard to public health 
or safety, the Secretary of Defense shall reimburse the person 
for the market value for the property. 
‘‘(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any firearm, ammunition, 
or ammunition component, or firearm part or accessory that is 
not prohibited for commercial sale. 
‘‘(f) DELIVERY OF SEIZED PROPERTY.—Any law enforcement offi-
cial who seizes property under subsection (c) and is not authorized 
to retain it for the United States shall deliver the property to 
an authorized member of the armed forces or other authorized 
official of the Department of Defense or the Department of Justice. 
‘‘(g) SCOPE OF ENFORCEMENT.—This section shall apply to the 
following: 
‘‘(1) Any military or Department of Defense property dis-
posed of on or after the date of the enactment of the Ike 
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 in a manner that is not in accordance with statutes 
and regulations governing Government property in effect at 
the time of the disposal of such property. 
‘‘(2) Any significant military equipment disposed of on or 
after January 1, 2002, in a manner that is not in accordance 
with statutes and regulations governing Government property 
in effect at the time of the disposal of such significant military 
equipment. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00742
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4197 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(h) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The authority of this section 
is in addition to any other authority of the United States with 
respect to property to which the United States may have right 
or title. 
‘‘(i) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘significant military equipment’ means 
defense articles on the United States Munitions List for which 
special export controls are warranted because of their capacity 
for substantial military utility or capability. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘museum’ has the meaning given that term 
in section 273(1) of the Museum Services Act (20 U.S.C. 
9172(1)). 
‘‘(3) The term ‘fully demilitarized’ means, with respect to 
equipment or material, the destruction of the military offensive 
or defensive advantages inherent in the equipment or material, 
including, at a minimum, the destruction or disabling of key 
points of such equipment or material, such as the fuselage, 
tail assembly, wing spar, armor, radar and radomes, armament 
and armament provisions, operating systems and software, and 
classified items. 
‘‘(4) The term ‘veterans organization’ means any organiza-
tion recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the 
representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 165 of such title is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 2789 the following new item: 
‘‘2790. Recovery of improperly disposed of Department of Defense property.’’. 
SEC. 356. OPERATIONAL READINESS MODELS. 
(a) REVIEW OF MODELS.—Not later than September 30, 2011, 
the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall conduct a 
study to identify, compare, and contrast the budget preparation 
tools and models used by each of the military departments to 
determine funding levels for operational readiness requirements 
during the programming, planning, budgeting, and execution 
process and report the findings to the congressional defense commit-
tees. In carrying out such study, the Director shall— 
(1) assess whether any additional or alternative verified 
and validated operational readiness model used by any military 
department for budgeting for flying or ground equipment hours, 
steaming days, equipment operations, equipment maintenance, 
and depot maintenance should be incorporated into the budget 
process of that military department; and 
(2) identify any shortcomings or deficiencies in the approach 
of each military department in building the operational readi-
ness budget for that department. 
(b) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Not later than April 1, 2012, 
in conjunction with the submission by the Secretary of Defense 
of the budget justification documents for fiscal year 2013, the Secre-
taries of each of the military departments, or designated representa-
tives thereof, shall brief the congressional defense committees on 
their respective responses to the study conducted by the Director 
of the Congressional Budget Office. Each such briefing shall 
include— 
(1) a description of how the military department concerned 
plans to address any deficiencies in the development of the 
Study. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00743
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4198 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
operational readiness budget of such department identified in 
the study; and 
(2) a description of how the modeling tools identified in 
the study could be used by the military department to improve 
the development of the operational readiness budget for the 
department. 
SEC. 357. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CONTINUED IMPORTANCE 
OF HIGH-ALTITUDE AVIATION TRAINING SITE, COLORADO. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) The High-Altitude Aviation Training Site in Gypsum, 
Colorado, is the only Department of Defense aviation school 
that provides an opportunity for rotor-wing military pilots to 
train in high-altitude, mountainous terrain, under full gross 
weight and power management operations. 
(2) The High-Altitude Aviation Training Site is operated 
by the Colorado Army National Guard and is available to 
pilots of all branches of the Armed Forces and to pilots of 
allied countries. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the High-Altitude Army Aviation Training Site con-
tinues to be critically important to ensuring the readiness and 
capabilities of rotor-wing military pilots; and 
(2) the Department of Defense should take all appropriate 
actions to prevent encroachment on the High-Altitude Army 
Aviation Training Site. 
SEC. 358. STUDY OF EFFECTS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION OF OBSTRUC-
TIONS ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AND OPERATIONS. 
(a) OBJECTIVE.—It shall be an objective of the Department 
of Defense to ensure that the robust development of renewable 
energy sources and the increased resiliency of the commercial elec-
trical grid may move forward in the United States, while minimizing 
or mitigating any adverse impacts on military operations and readi-
ness. 
(b) DESIGNATION
OF SENIOR OFFICIAL
AND LEAD ORGANIZA-
TION.— 
(1) DESIGNATION.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
designate a senior official of the Department of Defense, and 
a lead organization of the Department of Defense, to— 
(A) serve as the executive agent to carry out the review 
required by subsection (d); 
(B) serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate Department 
of Defense review of applications for projects filed with 
the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 
of title 49, United States Code, and received by the Depart-
ment of Defense from the Secretary of Transportation; and 
(C) accelerate the development of planning tools nec-
essary to determine the acceptability to the Department 
of Defense of proposals included in an application for a 
project submitted pursuant to such section. 
(2) RESOURCES.—The Secretary shall ensure that the senior 
official and lead organization designated under paragraph (1) 
are assigned such personnel and resources as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to carry out this section. 
(c) INITIAL ACTIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting 
Deadline. 
Deadline. 
49 USC 44718 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00744
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4199 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
through the senior official and lead organization designated pursu-
ant to subsection (b), shall— 
(1) conduct a preliminary review of each application for 
a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant 
to section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, that may 
have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness, 
unless such project has been granted a determination of no 
hazard. Such review shall, at a minimum, for each such 
project— 
(A) assess the likely scope and duration of any adverse 
impact of such project on military operations and readiness; 
and 
(B) identify any feasible and affordable actions that 
could be taken in the immediate future by the Department, 
the developer of such project, or others to mitigate such 
adverse impact and to minimize risks to national security 
while allowing such project to proceed with development; 
(2) develop, in coordination with other departments and 
agencies of the Federal Government, an integrated review 
process to ensure timely notification and consideration of 
projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant 
to section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, that may 
have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness; 
(3) establish procedures for the Department of Defense 
for the coordinated consideration of and response to a request 
for a review received from State and local officials or the 
developer of a renewable energy development or other energy 
project, including guidance to personnel at each military 
installation in the United States on how to initiate such proce-
dures and ensure a coordinated Department response while 
seeking to fulfil the objective under subsection (a); and 
(4) develop procedures for conducting early outreach to 
parties carrying out projects filed with the Secretary of 
Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, United 
States Code, that could have an adverse impact on military 
operations and readiness, and to the general public, to clearly 
communicate notice on actions being taken by the Department 
of Defense under this section and to receive comments from 
such parties and the general public on such actions. 
(d) COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW.— 
(1) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 
acting through the senior official and lead organization des-
ignated pursuant to subsection (b), shall develop a comprehen-
sive strategy for addressing the military impacts of projects 
filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 
44718 of title 49, United States Code. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—In developing the strategy required by 
paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(A) assess of the magnitude of interference posed by 
projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant 
to section 44718 of title 49, United States Code; 
(B) identify geographic areas selected as proposed loca-
tions for projects filed, or which may be filed in the future, 
with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 
44718 of title 49, United States Code, where such projects 
could have an adverse impact on military operations and 
Deadline. 
Procedures. 
Procedures. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00745
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4200 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
readiness and categorize the risk of adverse impact in 
such areas as high, medium, or low for the purpose of 
informing early outreach efforts under subsection (c)(4) 
and preliminary assessments under subsection (e); and 
(C) specifically identify feasible and affordable long- 
term actions that may be taken to mitigate adverse impacts 
of projects filed, or which may be filed in the future, with 
the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 
of title 49, United States Code, on military operations 
and readiness, including— 
(i) investment priorities of the Department of 
Defense with respect to research and development; 
(ii) 
modifications 
to 
military 
operations 
to 
accommodate applications for such projects; 
(iii) recommended upgrades or modifications to 
existing systems or procedures by the Department of 
Defense; 
(iv) acquisition of new systems by the Department 
and other departments and agencies of the Federal 
Government and timelines for fielding such new sys-
tems; and 
(v) modifications to the projects for which such 
applications are filed, including changes in size, loca-
tion, or technology. 
(e) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAZARD ASSESSMENT.— 
(1) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT.—The procedures established 
pursuant to subsection (c) shall ensure that not later than 
30 days after receiving a proper application for a project filed 
with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 
of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall 
review the project and provide a preliminary assessment of 
the level of risk of adverse impact on military operations and 
readiness that would arise from the project and the extent 
of mitigation that may be needed to address such risk. 
(2) DETERMINATION OF UNACCEPTABLE RISK.—The proce-
dures established pursuant to subsection (c) shall ensure that 
the Secretary of Defense does not object to a project filed 
with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 
of title 49, United States Code, except in a case in which 
the Secretary of Defense determines, after giving full consider-
ation to mitigation actions identified pursuant to this section, 
that such project would result in an unacceptable risk to the 
national security of the United States. 
(3) CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 
30 days after making a determination of unacceptable risk 
under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on such deter-
mination and the basis for such determination. Such a report 
shall include an explanation of the operational impact that 
led to the determination, a discussion of the mitigation options 
considered, and an explanation of why the mitigation options 
were not feasible or did not resolve the conflict. 
(4) NON-DELEGATION OF DETERMINATIONS.—The responsi-
bility for making a determination of unacceptable risk under 
paragraph (2) may only be delegated to an appropriate senior 
officer of the Department of Defense, on the recommendation 
of the senior official designated pursuant to subsection (b). 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00746
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4201 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
The following individuals are appropriate senior officers of the 
Department of Defense for the purposes of this paragraph: 
(A) The Deputy Secretary of Defense. 
(B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics. 
(C) The Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 
(f) REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March 15 each 
year from 2011 through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
the actions taken by the Department of Defense during the 
preceding year to implement this section and the comprehensive 
strategy developed pursuant to this section. 
(2) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—Each report submitted under 
paragraph (1) shall include— 
(A) the results of a review carried out by the Secretary 
of Defense of any projects filed with the Secretary of 
Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, United 
States Code— 
(i) that the Secretary of Defense has determined 
would result in an unacceptable risk to the national 
security; and 
(ii) for which the Secretary of Defense has rec-
ommended to the Secretary of Transportation that a 
hazard determination be issued; 
(B) an assessment of the risk associated with the loss 
or modifications of military training routes and a quan-
tification of such risk; 
(C) an assessment of the risk associated with solar 
power and similar systems as to the effects of glint on 
military readiness; 
(D) an assessment of the risk associated with electro-
magnetic interference on military readiness, including the 
effects of testing and evaluation ranges; 
(E) an assessment of any risks posed by the develop-
ment of projects filed with the Secretary of Transportation 
pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, 
to the prevention of threats and aggression directed toward 
the United States and its territories; and 
(F) a description of the distance from a military 
installation that the Department of Defense will use to 
prescreen applicants under section 44718 of title 49, United 
States Code. 
(g) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS OF FUNDS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense is authorized to accept a voluntary contribution 
of funds from an applicant for a project filed with the Secretary 
of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49, United 
States Code. Amounts so accepted shall be available for the purpose 
of offsetting the cost of measures undertaken by the Secretary 
of Defense to mitigate adverse impacts of such project on military 
operations and readiness. 
(h) EFFECT
OF DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE HAZARD ASSESS-
MENT.—An action taken pursuant to this section shall not be consid-
ered to be a substitute for any assessment or determination required 
of the Secretary of Transportation under section 44718 of title 
49, United States Code. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00747
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4202 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(i) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section shall be con-
strued to affect or limit the application of, or any obligation to 
comply with, any environmental law, including the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 
(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘military training route’’ means a training 
route developed as part of the Military Training Route Program, 
carried out jointly by the Federal Aviation Administration and 
the Secretary of Defense, for use by the Armed Forces for 
the purpose of conducting low-altitude, high-speed military 
training. 
(2) The term ‘‘military installation’’ has the meaning given 
that term in section 2801(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code. 
(3) The term ‘‘military readiness’’ includes any training 
or operation that could be related to combat readiness, including 
testing and evaluation activities. 
TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
Subtitle A—Active Forces 
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 
Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. 
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the Reserves. 
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2011 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty 
for operational support. 
Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 
Sec. 421. Military personnel. 
Subtitle A—Active Forces 
SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES. 
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty 
personnel as of September 30, 2011, as follows: 
(1) The Army, 569,400. 
(2) The Navy, 328,700. 
(3) The Marine Corps, 202,100. 
(4) The Air Force, 332,200. 
SEC. 402. REVISION IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 
MINIMUM LEVELS. 
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following 
new paragraphs: 
‘‘(1) For the Army, 547,400. 
‘‘(2) For the Navy, 324,300. 
‘‘(3) For the Marine Corps, 202,100. 
‘‘(4) For the Air Force, 332,200.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00748
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4203 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 
SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths 
for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of 
September 30, 2011, as follows: 
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 358,200. 
(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. 
(3) The Navy Reserve, 65,500. 
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. 
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 106,700. 
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 71,200. 
(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 10,000. 
(b) END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS.—The end strengths prescribed 
by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component 
shall be proportionately reduced by— 
(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve 
as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which 
are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of 
the fiscal year; and 
(2) the total number of individual members not in units 
organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such 
component who are on active duty (other than for training 
or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their 
consent at the end of the fiscal year. 
(c) END STRENGTH INCREASES.—Whenever units or individual 
members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are 
released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength 
prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such 
reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total 
authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of 
such individual members. 
SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SUP-
PORT OF THE RESERVES. 
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the 
reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of 
September 30, 2011, the following number of Reserves to be serving 
on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members 
of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, 
recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: 
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. 
(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. 
(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,688. 
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. 
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,584. 
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,992. 
SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL 
STATUS). 
The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) 
as of the last day of fiscal year 2011 for the reserve components 
of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of 
title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: 
(1) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. 
(2) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
27,210. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00749
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4204 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,720. 
(4) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 22,394. 
SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2011 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 
STATUS TECHNICIANS. 
(a) LIMITATIONS.— 
(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in 
section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number 
of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard 
as of September 30, 2011, may not exceed the following: 
(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 
1,600. 
(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 
350. 
(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status techni-
cians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2011, 
may not exceed 595. 
(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status 
technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 
30, 2011, may not exceed 90. 
(b) NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘non-dual status technician’’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 
SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED 
TO BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT. 
During fiscal year 2011, the maximum number of members 
of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving 
at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 
115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: 
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. 
(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. 
(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. 
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. 
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. 
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. 
Subtitle C—Authorization of 
Appropriations 
SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF
APPROPRIATIONS.—There is hereby 
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for 
military personnel for fiscal year 2011 a total of $138,540,700,000. 
(b) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORIZATION.—The authorization of 
appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization 
of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal 
year 2011. 
TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL 
POLICY 
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 
Sec. 501. Ages for appointment and mandatory retirement for health professions of-
ficers. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00750
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4205 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 502. Authority for appointment of warrant officers in the grade of W–1 by com-
mission and standardization of warrant officer appointing authority. 
Sec. 503. Nondisclosure of information from discussions, deliberations, notes, and 
records of special selection boards. 
Sec. 504. Administrative removal of officers from promotion list. 
Sec. 505. Modification of authority for officers selected for appointment to general 
and flag officer grades to wear insignia of higher grade before appoint-
ment. 
Sec. 506. Temporary authority to reduce minimum length of active service as a 
commissioned officer required for voluntary retirement as an officer. 
Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 
Sec. 511. Removal of statutory distribution limits on Navy reserve flag officer allo-
cation. 
Sec. 512. Assignment of Air Force Reserve military technicians (dual status) to po-
sitions outside Air Force Reserve unit program. 
Sec. 513. Temporary authority for temporary employment of non-dual status mili-
tary technicians. 
Sec. 514. Revision of structure and functions of the Reserve Forces Policy Board. 
Sec. 515. Repeal of requirement for new oath when officer transfers from active- 
duty list to reserve active-status list. 
Sec. 516. Leave of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 517. Direct appointment of graduates of the United States Merchant Marine 
Academy into the National Guard. 
Subtitle C—Joint Qualified Officers and Requirements 
Sec. 521. Technical revisions to definition of joint matters for purposes of joint offi-
cer management. 
Sec. 522. Modification of promotion board procedures for joint qualified officers and 
officers with Joint Staff experience. 
Subtitle D—General Service Authorities 
Sec. 531. Extension of temporary authority to order retired members of the Armed 
Forces to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments. 
Sec. 532. Non-chargeable rest and recuperation absence for certain members under-
going extended deployment to a combat zone. 
Sec. 533. Correction of military records. 
Sec. 534. Disposition of members found to be fit for duty who are not suitable for 
deployment or worldwide assignment for medical reasons. 
Sec. 535. Review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female 
members of the Armed Forces. 
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal Matters 
Sec. 541. Continuation of warrant officers on active duty to complete disciplinary 
action. 
Sec. 542. Enhanced authority to punish contempt in military justice proceedings. 
Sec. 543. Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs. 
Subtitle F—Member Education and Training Opportunities and Administration 
Sec. 551. Enhancements of Department of Defense undergraduate nurse training 
program. 
Sec. 552. Repayment of education loan repayment benefits. 
Sec. 553. Participation of Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Finan-
cial Assistance Program recipients in active duty health profession loan 
repayment program. 
Sec. 554. Active duty obligation for military academy graduates who participate in 
the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assist-
ance program. 
Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education 
Sec. 561. Enrollment of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who reside in 
temporary housing in Department of Defense domestic dependent ele-
mentary and secondary schools. 
Sec. 562. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 
dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 
civilian employees. 
Sec. 563. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 
Subtitle H—Decorations and Awards 
Sec. 571. Clarification of persons eligible for award of bronze star medal. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00751
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4206 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 572. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to 
Shinyei Matayoshi for acts of valor during World War II. 
Sec. 573. Authorization and request for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to 
Jay C. Copley for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 
Sec. 574. Program to commemorate 60th anniversary of the Korean War. 
Subtitle I—Military Family Readiness Matters 
Sec. 581. Appointment of additional members of Department of Defense Military 
Family Readiness Council. 
Sec. 582. Enhancement of community support for military families with special 
needs. 
Sec. 583. Modification of Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program. 
Sec. 584. Expansion and continuation of Joint Family Support Assistance Program. 
Sec. 585. Report on military spouse education programs. 
Sec. 586. Report on enhancing benefits available for military dependent children 
with special education needs. 
Sec. 587. Reports on child development centers and financial assistance for child 
care for members of the Armed Forces. 
Subtitle J—Other Matters 
Sec. 591. Authority for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 
and Coast Guard civilian employees and their families to accept gifts 
from non-Federal entities. 
Sec. 592. Increase in number of private sector civilians authorized for admission to 
National Defense University. 
Sec. 593. Admission of defense industry civilians to attend United States Air Force 
Institute of Technology. 
Sec. 594. Updated terminology for Army Medical Service Corps. 
Sec. 595. Date for submission of annual report on Department of Defense 
STARBASE Program. 
Sec. 596. Extension of deadline for submission of final report of Military Leader-
ship Diversity Commission. 
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy 
Generally 
SEC. 501. AGES FOR APPOINTMENT AND MANDATORY RETIREMENT 
FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS OFFICERS. 
(a) AGE FOR ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT AS HEALTH PROFESSIONS 
OFFICER.—Section 532(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘reserve’’. 
(b) MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS 
OFFICERS.— 
(1) ADDITIONAL
CATEGORIES
OF
OFFICERS
ELIGIBLE
FOR 
DEFERRAL
OF
MANDATORY
RETIREMENT
FOR
AGE.—Paragraph 
(2) of section 1251(b) of such title is amended— 
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(D) an officer in a category of officers designated by the 
Secretary of the military department concerned for the purposes 
of this paragraph as consisting of officers whose duties consist 
primarily of— 
‘‘(i) providing health care; 
‘‘(ii) performing other clinical care; or 
‘‘(iii) performing health care-related administrative 
duties.’’. 
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of such sec-
tion is amended by striking ‘‘the officer will be performing 
duties consisting primarily of providing patient care or per-
forming other clinical duties.’’ and inserting ‘‘the officer— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00752
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4207 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(A) will be performing duties consisting primarily of pro-
viding patient care or performing other clinical duties; or 
‘‘(B) is in a category of officers designated under subpara-
graph (D) of paragraph (2) whose duties will consist primarily 
of the duties described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of such subpara-
graph.’’. 
SEC. 502. AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF WARRANT OFFICERS IN 
THE GRADE OF W–1 BY COMMISSION AND STANDARDIZA-
TION OF WARRANT OFFICER APPOINTING AUTHORITY. 
(a) REGULAR OFFICERS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENTS BY COMMISSION IN WAR-
RANT OFFICER W–1 GRADE.—The first sentence of section 571(b) 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘by 
the Secretary concerned’’ and inserting ‘‘, except that with 
respect to an armed force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary 
of a military department, the Secretary concerned may provide 
by regulation that appointments in that grade in that armed 
force shall be made by commission’’. 
(2) APPOINTING AUTHORITY.—The second sentence of such 
section is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
the following: ‘‘, and appointments (whether by warrant or 
commission) in the grade of regular warrant officer, W–1, shall 
be made by the President, except that appointments in that 
grade in the Coast Guard shall be made by the Secretary 
concerned’’. 
(b) RESERVE OFFICERS.—Subsection (b) of section 12241 of such 
title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) Appointments in permanent reserve warrant officer grades 
shall be made in the same manner as is prescribed for regular 
warrant officer grades by section 571(b) of this title.’’. 
(c) PRESIDENTIAL FUNCTIONS.—Except as otherwise provided 
by the President by Executive order, the provisions of Executive 
Order 13384 (10 U.S.C. 531 note) relating to the functions of the 
President under the second sentence of section 571(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, shall apply in the same manner to the functions 
of the President under section 12241(b) of title 10, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 503. NONDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FROM DISCUSSIONS, 
DELIBERATIONS, NOTES, AND RECORDS OF SPECIAL 
SELECTION BOARDS. 
(a) NONDISCLOSURE OF BOARD PROCEEDINGS.—Section 613a of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON DISCLOSURE.—The proceedings of a selec-
tion board convened under section 573, 611, or 628 of this title 
may not be disclosed to any person not a member of the board, 
except as authorized or required to process the report of the board. 
This prohibition is a statutory exemption from disclosure, as 
described in section 552(b)(3) of title 5.’’; 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘AND RECORDS’’ and 
inserting ‘‘NOTES, AND RECORDS’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.—This section applies to all selection boards 
convened under section 573, 611, or 628 of this title, regardless 
of the date on which the board was convened.’’. 
Applicability. 
10 USC 12241 
note. 
President. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00753
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4208 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) REPORTS
OF BOARDS.—Section 628(c)(2) of such title is 
amended by striking ‘‘sections 576(d) and 576(f)’’ and inserting 
‘‘sections 576(d), 576(f), and 613a’’. 
(c) RESERVE BOARDS.—Section 14104 of such title is amended— 
(1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON DISCLOSURE.—The proceedings of a selec-
tion board convened under section 14101 or 14502 of this title 
may not be disclosed to any person not a member of the board, 
except as authorized or required to process the report of the board. 
This prohibition is a statutory exemption from disclosure, as 
described in section 552(b)(3) of title 5.’’; 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘AND RECORDS’’ and 
inserting ‘‘NOTES, AND RECORDS’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.—This section applies to all selection boards 
convened under section 14101 or 14502 of this title, regardless 
of the date on which the board was convened.’’. 
SEC. 504. ADMINISTRATIVE REMOVAL OF OFFICERS FROM PROMOTION 
LIST. 
(a) ACTIVE-DUTY LIST.—Section 629 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new sub-
section (d): 
‘‘(d) ADMINISTRATIVE REMOVAL.—Under regulations prescribed 
by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the active-duty list 
is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred to a retired 
status after having been recommended for promotion to a higher 
grade under this chapter, but before being promoted, the officer’s 
name shall be administratively removed from the list of officers 
recommended for promotion by a selection board.’’. 
(b) RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.—Section 14310 of such title 
is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new sub-
section (d): 
‘‘(d) ADMINISTRATIVE REMOVAL.—Under regulations prescribed 
by the Secretary concerned, if an officer on the reserve active- 
status list is discharged or dropped from the rolls or transferred 
to a retired status after having been recommended for promotion 
to a higher grade under this chapter or having been found qualified 
for Federal recognition in the higher grade under title 32, but 
before being promoted, the officer’s name shall be administratively 
removed from the list of officers recommended for promotion by 
a selection board.’’. 
SEC. 505. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS SELECTED 
FOR APPOINTMENT TO GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER 
GRADES TO WEAR INSIGNIA OF HIGHER GRADE BEFORE 
APPOINTMENT. 
(a) LIMITED AUTHORITY FOR OFFICERS SELECTED FOR APPOINT-
MENT TO GRADES ABOVE MAJOR GENERAL AND REAR ADMIRAL.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section: 
Regulations. 
Regulations. 
10 USC 628. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00754
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4209 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘§ 777a. Wearing of insignia of higher grade before appoint-
ment to a grade above major general or rear 
admiral (frocking): authority; restrictions 
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—An officer serving in a grade below the grade 
of lieutenant general or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral, 
who has been selected for appointment to the grade of lieutenant 
general or general, or, in the case of the Navy, vice admiral or 
admiral, and an officer serving in the grade of lieutenant general 
or vice admiral who has been selected for appointment to the 
grade of general or admiral, may be authorized, under regulations 
and policies of the Department of Defense and subject to subsection 
(b), to wear the insignia for that higher grade for a period of 
up to 14 days before assuming the duties of a position for which 
the higher grade is authorized. An officer who is so authorized 
to wear the insignia of a higher grade is said to be ‘frocked’ to 
that grade. 
‘‘(b) RESTRICTIONS.—An officer may not be authorized to wear 
the insignia for a grade as described in subsection (a) unless— 
‘‘(1) the Senate has given its advice and consent to the 
appointment of the officer to that grade; 
‘‘(2) the officer has received orders to serve in a position 
outside the military department of that officer for which that 
grade is authorized; 
‘‘(3) the Secretary of Defense (or a civilian officer within 
the Office of the Secretary of Defense whose appointment was 
made with the advice and consent of the Senate and to whom 
the Secretary delegates such approval authority) has given 
approval for the officer to wear the insignia for that grade 
before assuming the duties of a position for which that grade 
is authorized; and 
‘‘(4) the Secretary of Defense has submitted to Congress 
a written notification of the intent to authorize the officer 
to wear the insignia for that grade. 
‘‘(c) BENEFITS
NOT
TO
BE
CONSTRUED
AS
ACCRUING.—(1) 
Authority provided to an officer as described in subsection (a) to 
wear the insignia of a higher grade may not be construed as 
conferring authority for that officer to— 
‘‘(A) be paid the rate of pay provided for an officer in 
that grade having the same number of years of service as 
that officer; or 
‘‘(B) assume any legal authority associated with that grade. 
‘‘(2) The period for which an officer wears the insignia of a 
higher grade under such authority may not be taken into account 
for any of the following purposes: 
‘‘(A) Seniority in that grade. 
‘‘(B) Time of service in that grade. 
‘‘(d) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF OFFICERS FROCKED.—The total 
number of officers who are authorized to wear the insignia for 
a higher grade under this section shall count against the limitation 
in section 777(d) of this title on the total number of officers author-
ized to wear the insignia of a higher grade.’’. 
Notification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00755
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4210 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item: 
‘‘777a. Wearing of insignia of higher grade before appointment to a grade above 
major general or rear admiral (frocking): authority; restrictions.’’. 
(b) REPEAL OF WAITING PERIOD FOLLOWING CONGRESSIONAL 
NOTIFICATION FOR OFFICERS SELECTED FOR APPOINTMENT TO GEN-
ERAL
AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES BELOW LIEUTENANT GENERAL 
AND VICE ADMIRAL.—Section 777(b)(3)(B) of such title is amended 
by striking ‘‘and a period of 30 days has elapsed after the date 
of the notification’’. 
SEC. 506. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO REDUCE MINIMUM LENGTH OF 
ACTIVE SERVICE AS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER REQUIRED 
FOR VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT AS AN OFFICER. 
(a) ARMY.—Section 3911(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ‘‘January 6, 2006, and ending on December 
31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of the Ike 
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 
and ending on September 30, 2013’’. 
(b) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Section 6323(a)(2)(B) of such 
title is amended by striking ‘‘January 6, 2006, and ending on 
December 31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of 
the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011 and ending on September 30, 2013’’. 
(c) AIR FORCE.—Section 8911(b)(2) of such title is amended 
by striking ‘‘January 6, 2006, and ending on December 31, 2008’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 and ending on 
September 30, 2013’’. 
Subtitle B—Reserve Component 
Management 
SEC. 511. REMOVAL OF STATUTORY DISTRIBUTION LIMITS ON NAVY 
RESERVE FLAG OFFICER ALLOCATION. 
Section 12004(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), and (5); and 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (2). 
SEC. 512. ASSIGNMENT OF AIR FORCE RESERVE MILITARY TECHNI-
CIANS (DUAL STATUS) TO POSITIONS OUTSIDE AIR FORCE 
RESERVE UNIT PROGRAM. 
Section 10216(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a military technician 
(dual status) who is employed by the Air Force Reserve in an 
area other than the Air Force Reserve unit program, except that 
not more than 50 of such technicians may be assigned outside 
of the unit program at the same time.’’. 
SEC. 513. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT 
OF NON-DUAL STATUS MILITARY TECHNICIANS. 
(a) EXCEPTION FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT.—Section 10217 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
10 USC 777. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00756
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4211 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (1); 
(B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
(2) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) is hired as a temporary employee pursuant to the 
exception for temporary employment provided by subsection 
(d) and subject to the terms and conditions of such subsection.’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(d) EXCEPTION FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT.—(1) Notwith-
standing section 10218 of this title, the Secretary of the Army 
or the Secretary of the Air Force may employ, for a period not 
to exceed two years, a person to fill a vacancy created by the 
mobilization of a military technician (dual status) occupying a posi-
tion under section 10216 of this title. 
‘‘(2) The duration of the temporary employment of a person 
in a military technician position under this subsection may not 
exceed the shorter of the following: 
‘‘(A) The period of mobilization of the military technician 
(dual status) whose vacancy is being filled by the temporary 
employee. 
‘‘(B) Two years. 
‘‘(3) No person may be hired under the authority of this sub-
section after the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this subsection.’’. 
(b) EXCEPTION FROM PERMANENT LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF 
NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS.—Subsection (c) of such section 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) An individual employed as a non-dual status technician 
as described in subsection (a)(3) shall not be consider a non-dual 
status technician for purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2).’’. 
SEC. 514. REVISION OF STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE RESERVE 
FORCES POLICY BOARD. 
(a) REVISION OF STRUCTURE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 10301 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 10301. Reserve Forces Policy Board 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—As provided in section 175 of this title, 
there is in the Office of the Secretary of Defense a board known 
as the ‘Reserve Forces Policy Board’ (in this section referred to 
as the ‘Board’). 
‘‘(b) FUNCTIONS.—The Board shall serve as an independent 
adviser to the Secretary of Defense to provide advice and rec-
ommendations to the Secretary on strategies, policies, and practices 
designed to improve and enhance the capabilities, efficiency, and 
effectiveness of the reserve components. 
‘‘(c) MEMBERSHIP.—The Board consists of 20 members, 
appointed or designated as follows: 
‘‘(1) A civilian appointed by the Secretary of Defense from 
among persons determined by the Secretary to have the knowl-
edge of, and experience in, policy matters relevant to national 
security and reserve component matters necessary to carry 
out the duties of chair of the Board, who shall serve as chair 
of the Board. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
10 USC 10217. 
Time period. 
Time period. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00757
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4212 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(2) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted mem-
bers designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the rec-
ommendation of the Secretary of the Army— 
‘‘(A) one of whom shall be a member of the Army 
National Guard of the United States or a former member 
of the Army National Guard of the United States in the 
Retired Reserve; and 
‘‘(B) one of whom shall be a member or retired member 
of the Army Reserve. 
‘‘(3) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted mem-
bers designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the rec-
ommendation of the Secretary of the Navy— 
‘‘(A) one of whom shall be an active or retired officer 
of the Navy Reserve; and 
‘‘(B) one of whom shall be an active or retired officer 
of the Marine Corps Reserve. 
‘‘(4) Two active or retired reserve officers or enlisted mem-
bers designated by the Secretary of Defense upon the rec-
ommendation of the Secretary of the Air Force— 
‘‘(A) one of whom shall be a member of the Air National 
Guard of the United States or a former member of the 
Air National Guard of the United States in the Retired 
Reserve; and 
‘‘(B) one of whom shall be a member or retired member 
of the Air Force Reserve. 
‘‘(5) One active or retired reserve officer or enlisted member 
of the Coast Guard designated by the Secretary of Homeland 
Security. 
‘‘(6) Ten persons appointed or designated by the Secretary 
of Defense, each of whom shall be a United States citizen 
having significant knowledge of and experience in policy mat-
ters relevant to national security and reserve component mat-
ters and shall be one of the following: 
‘‘(A) An individual not employed in any Federal or 
State department or agency. 
‘‘(B) An individual employed by a Federal or State 
department or agency. 
‘‘(C) An officer of a regular component of the armed 
forces on active duty, or an officer of a reserve component 
of the armed forces in an active status, who— 
‘‘(i) is serving or has served in a senior position 
on the Joint Staff, the headquarters staff of a combat-
ant command, or the headquarters staff of an armed 
force; and 
‘‘(ii) has experience in joint professional military 
education, joint qualification, and joint operations mat-
ters. 
‘‘(7) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or 
Marine Corps who is a general or flag officer recommended 
by the chair and designated by the Secretary of Defense, who 
shall serve without vote— 
‘‘(A) as military adviser to the chair; 
‘‘(B) as military executive officer of the Board; and 
‘‘(C) as supervisor of the operations and staff of the 
Board. 
‘‘(8) A senior enlisted member of a reserve component rec-
ommended by the chair and designated by the Secretary of 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00758
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4213 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Defense, who shall serve without vote as enlisted military 
adviser to the chair. 
‘‘(d) MATTERS TO BE ACTED ON.—The Board may act on those 
matters referred to it by the chair and on any matter raised by 
a member of the Board or the Secretary of Defense. 
‘‘(e) STAFF.—The Board shall be supported by a staff consisting 
of one full-time officer from each of the reserve components listed 
in paragraphs (1) through (6) of section 10101 of this title who 
holds the grade of colonel (or in the case of the Navy, the grade 
of captain) or who has been selected for promotion to that grade. 
These officers shall also serve as liaisons between their respective 
components and the Board. They shall perform their staff and 
liaison duties under the supervision of the military executive officer 
of the Board in an independent manner reflecting the independent 
nature of the Board. 
‘‘(f) RELATIONSHIP TO SERVICE RESERVE POLICY COMMITTEES 
AND BOARDS.—This section does not affect the committees and 
boards prescribed within the military departments by sections 
10302 through 10305 of this title, and a member of such a committee 
or board may, if otherwise eligible, be a member of the Board.’’. 
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph 
(1) shall take effect on July 1, 2011. 
(b) REVISION
TO
ANNUAL
REPORT
REQUIREMENT.—Section 
113(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
‘‘the reserve programs of the Department of Defense and on any 
other matters’’ and inserting ‘‘on any reserve component matter’’. 
SEC. 515. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR NEW OATH WHEN OFFICER 
TRANSFERS 
FROM 
ACTIVE-DUTY 
LIST 
TO 
RESERVE 
ACTIVE-STATUS LIST. 
Section 12201(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘An officer transferred from the active-duty list of an 
armed force to a reserve active-status list of an armed force under 
section 647 of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘If an officer is transferred 
from the active-duty list of an armed force to a reserve active- 
status list of an armed force in accordance with regulations pre-
scribed by the Secretary of Defense, the officer’’. 
SEC. 516. LEAVE OF MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF 
THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) CARRYOVER OF ACCUMULATED LEAVE TO SUCCEEDING PERIOD 
OF ACTIVE SERVICE.—Section 701 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(k) A member of a reserve component who accumulates leave 
during a period of active service may carry over any leave so 
accumulated to the member’s next period of active service, subject 
to the accumulation limits in subsections (b), (d), and (f), without 
regard to separation or release from active service if the separation 
or release is under honorable conditions. The taking of leave carried 
over under this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of 
this section.’’. 
(b) PAYMENT
FOR UNUSED ACCRUED LEAVE.—Section 501(a) 
of title 37, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 
and inserting a semicolon; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 
10 USC 10301 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00759
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4214 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(4) in the case of an officer or an enlisted member of 
a reserve component who is not serving on active duty, separa-
tion or release from the reserve component under honorable 
conditions, or death; and 
‘‘(5) in the case of an enlisted member of a reserve a 
component who is not serving on active duty, termination of 
enlistment in conjunction with the commencement of a succes-
sive enlistment, or appointment as an officer.’’. 
SEC. 517. DIRECT APPOINTMENT OF GRADUATES OF THE UNITED 
STATES 
MERCHANT 
MARINE 
ACADEMY 
INTO 
THE 
NATIONAL GUARD. 
Section 305(a)(5) of title 32, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘or the United States Coast Guard Academy’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the United States Coast Guard Academy, or the United 
States Merchant Marine Academy’’. 
Subtitle C—Joint Qualified Officers and 
Requirements 
SEC. 521. TECHNICAL REVISIONS TO DEFINITION OF JOINT MATTERS 
FOR PURPOSES OF JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT. 
Section 668(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘multiple’’ in the matter preceding 
subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘integrated’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of the subparagraph 
(D) and inserting ‘‘or’’; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) In the context of joint matters, the term ‘integrated military 
forces’ refers to military forces that are involved in the planning 
or execution (or both) of operations involving participants from— 
‘‘(A) more than one military department; or 
‘‘(B) a military department and one or more of the following: 
‘‘(i) Other departments and agencies of the United 
States. 
‘‘(ii) The military forces or agencies of other countries. 
‘‘(iii) Non-governmental persons or entities.’’. 
SEC. 522. MODIFICATION OF PROMOTION BOARD PROCEDURES FOR 
JOINT QUALIFIED OFFICERS AND OFFICERS WITH JOINT 
STAFF EXPERIENCE. 
(a) BOARD COMPOSITION.—Subsection (c) of section 612 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c)(1) Each selection board convened under section 611(a) of 
this title that will consider an officer described in paragraph (2) 
shall include at least one officer designated by the Chairman of 
the Joint Chiefs of Staff who is a joint qualified officer. 
‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to an officer who— 
‘‘(A) is serving on, or has served on, the Joint Staff; or 
‘‘(B) is a joint qualified officer. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in 
paragraph (1) in the case of— 
‘‘(A) any selection board of the Marine Corps; or 
Waiver authority. 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00760
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4215 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(B) any selection board that is considering officers in 
specialties identified in paragraph (2) or (3) of section 619a(b) 
of this title.’’. 
(b) INFORMATION FURNISHED TO SELECTION BOARDS.—Section 
615 of such title is amended in subsections (b)(5) and (c) by striking 
‘‘in joint duty assignments of officers who are serving, or have 
served, in such assignments’’ and inserting ‘‘of officers who are 
serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified 
officers’’. 
(c) ACTION ON REPORT OF SELECTION BOARDS.—Section 618(b) 
of such title is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘are serving, or have 
served, in joint duty assignments’’ and inserting ‘‘are serving 
on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or are joint qualified 
officers’’; 
(2) in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2), by 
striking ‘‘in joint duty assignments of officers who are serving, 
or have served, in such assignments’’ and inserting ‘‘of officers 
who are serving on, or have served on, the Joint Staff or 
are joint qualified officers’’; and 
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘in joint duty assignments’’ 
and inserting ‘‘who are serving on, or have served on, the 
Joint Staff or are joint qualified officers’’. 
Subtitle D—General Service Authorities 
SEC. 531. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO ORDER RETIRED 
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO ACTIVE DUTY IN 
HIGH-DEMAND, LOW-DENSITY ASSIGNMENTS. 
(a) EXTENSION
OF AUTHORITY.—Section 688a(f) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2011, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing 
an assessment by the Secretary of the need to extend the authority 
provided by section 688a of title 10, United States Code, beyond 
December 31, 2011. The report shall include, at a minimum, the 
following: 
(1) A list of the current types of high-demand, low-density 
capabilities (as defined in such section) for which the authority 
is being used to address operational requirements. 
(2) For each high-demand, low-density capability included 
in the list under paragraph (1), the number of retired members 
of the Armed Forces who have served on active duty at any 
time during each of fiscal years 2007 through 2010 under 
the authority. 
(3) A plan to increase the required active duty strength 
for the high-demand, low-density capabilities included in the 
list under paragraph (1) to eliminate the need to use the 
authority. 
10 USC 615. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00761
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4216 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 532. NON-CHARGEABLE REST AND RECUPERATION ABSENCE FOR 
CERTAIN MEMBERS UNDERGOING EXTENDED DEPLOY-
MENT TO A COMBAT ZONE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 40 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after section 705 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 705a. Rest and recuperation absence: certain members 
undergoing extended deployment to a combat zone 
‘‘(a) REST AND RECUPERATION AUTHORIZED.—Under regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary concerned 
may provide a member of the armed forces described in subsection 
(b) the benefits described in subsection (c). 
‘‘(b) COVERED
MEMBERS.—A member of the armed forces 
described in this subsection is any member who— 
‘‘(1) is assigned or deployed for at least 270 days in an 
area or location— 
‘‘(A) that is designated by the President as a combat 
zone; and 
‘‘(B) in which hardship duty pay is authorized to be 
paid under section 305 of title 37; and 
‘‘(2) meets such other criteria as the Secretary of Defense 
may prescribe in the regulations required by subsection (a). 
‘‘(c) BENEFITS.—The benefits described in this subsection are 
the following: 
‘‘(1) A period of rest and recuperation absence for not 
more than 15 days. 
‘‘(2) Round-trip transportation at Government expense from 
the area or location in which the member is serving in connec-
tion with the exercise of the period of rest and recuperation. 
‘‘(d) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LEAVE.—Any benefits provided 
a member under this section are in addition to any other leave 
or absence to which the member may be entitled.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to section 705 the following new item: 
‘‘705a. Rest and recuperation absence: certain members undergoing extended deploy-
ment to a combat zone.’’. 
SEC. 533. CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. 
(a) MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO REQUEST REVIEW OF RETIREMENT 
OR SEPARATION WITHOUT PAY FOR PHYSICAL DISABILITY.—Section 
1554(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘an officer’’ and inserting ‘‘a member or 
former member of the uniformed services’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘his case’’ and inserting ‘‘the member’s case’’. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON REDUCTION
IN PERSONNEL ASSIGNED
TO 
DUTY WITH SERVICE REVIEW AGENCY.—1559(a) of such title is 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2013’’. 
SEC. 534. DISPOSITION OF MEMBERS FOUND TO BE FIT FOR DUTY 
WHO ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR DEPLOYMENT OR WORLD-
WIDE ASSIGNMENT FOR MEDICAL REASONS. 
(a) DISPOSITION.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 61 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1214 the following 
new section: 
Regulations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00762
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4217 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘§ 1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical 
Evaluation Board evaluation: prohibition on 
involuntary administrative separation due to 
unsuitability based on medical conditions consid-
ered in evaluation 
‘‘(a) DISPOSITION.—Except as provided in subsection (c), the 
Secretary of the military department concerned may not authorize 
the involuntary administrative separation of a member described 
in subsection (b) based on a determination that the member is 
unsuitable for deployment or worldwide assignment based on the 
same medical condition of the member considered by a Physical 
Evaluation Board during the evaluation of the member. 
‘‘(b) COVERED MEMBERS.—A member covered by subsection (a) 
is any member of the armed forces who has been determined 
by a Physical Evaluation Board pursuant to a physical evaluation 
by the board to be fit for duty. 
‘‘(c) REEVALUATION.—(1) The Secretary of the military depart-
ment concerned may direct the Physical Evaluation Board to 
reevaluate any member described in subsection (b) if the Secretary 
has reason to believe that a medical condition of the member 
considered by the Physical Evaluation Board during the evaluation 
of the member described in that subsection renders the member 
unsuitable for continued military service based on the medical 
condition. 
‘‘(2) A member determined pursuant to reevaluation under para-
graph (1) to be unfit to perform the duties of the member’s office, 
grade, rank, or rating may be retired or separated for physical 
disability under this chapter. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall be the final approval 
authority for any case determined by the Secretary of a military 
department to warrant administrative separation based on a deter-
mination that the member is unsuitable for continued service due 
to the same medical condition of the member considered by a 
Physical Evaluation Board that found the member fit for duty.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 61 of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 1214 the following new item: 
‘‘1214a. Members determined fit for duty in Physical Evaluation Board evaluation: 
prohibition 
on 
involuntary 
administrative 
separation 
due 
to 
unsuitability based on medical conditions considered in evaluation.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and shall apply with respect to members evaluated for fitness 
for duty by Physical Evaluation Boards on or after that date. 
SEC. 
535. 
REVIEW 
OF 
LAWS, 
POLICIES, 
AND 
REGULATIONS 
RESTRICTING SERVICE OF FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE 
ARMED FORCES. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordina-
tion with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall conduct 
a review of laws, policies, and regulations, including the collocation 
policy, that may restrict the service of female members of the 
Armed Forces to determine whether changes in such laws, policies, 
and regulations are needed to ensure that female members have 
an equitable opportunity to compete and excel in the Armed Forces. 
10 USC 1214a 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00763
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4218 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than April 15, 2011, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report containing the results of the review. 
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal 
Matters 
SEC. 541. CONTINUATION OF WARRANT OFFICERS ON ACTIVE DUTY 
TO COMPLETE DISCIPLINARY ACTION. 
Section 580 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(f) A warrant officer subject to discharge or retirement under 
this section, but against whom any action has been commenced 
with a view to trying the officer by court-martial, may be continued 
on active duty, without prejudice to such action, until the completion 
of such action.’’. 
SEC. 542. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO PUNISH CONTEMPT IN MILITARY 
JUSTICE PROCEEDINGS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 848 of title 10, United States Code 
(article 48 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 848. Art. 48. Contempts 
‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO PUNISH CONTEMPT.—A judge detailed to 
a court-martial, a court of inquiry, the United States Court of 
Appeals for the Armed Forces, a military Court of Criminal Appeals, 
a provost court, or a military commission may punish for contempt 
any person who— 
‘‘(1) uses any menacing word, sign, or gesture in the pres-
ence of the judge during the proceedings of the court-martial, 
court, or military commission; 
‘‘(2) disturbs the proceedings of the court-martial, court, 
or military commission by any riot or disorder; or 
‘‘(3) willfully disobeys the lawful writ, process, order, rule, 
decree, or command of the court-martial, court, or military 
commission. 
‘‘(b) PUNISHMENT.—The punishment for contempt under sub-
section (a) may not exceed confinement for 30 days, a fine of 
$1,000, or both. 
‘‘(c) 
INAPPLICABILITY
TO
MILITARY
COMMISSIONS
UNDER 
CHAPTER 47A.—This section does not apply to a military commission 
established under chapter 47A of this title.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 848 of title 10, United States 
Code (article 48 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as 
amended by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to acts of 
contempt committed after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 543. IMPROVEMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOMESTIC 
VIOLENCE PROGRAMS. 
(a) IMPLEMENTATION OF OUTSTANDING COMPTROLLER GENERAL 
RECOMMENDATIONS.—Consistent with the recommendations con-
tained in the report of the Comptroller General of the United 
States titled ‘‘Status of Implementation of GAO’s 2006 Rec-
ommendations on the Department of Defense’s Domestic Violence 
Program’’ (GAO–10–577R), the Secretary of Defense shall complete, 
Deadline. 
Plans. 
10 USC 1562 
note. 
10 USC 848 note. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00764
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4219 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
implementation of actions to address the following recommenda-
tions: 
(1) DEFENSE INCIDENT-BASED REPORTING SYSTEM.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive management 
plan to address deficiencies in the data captured in the Defense 
Incident-Based Reporting System to ensure the system can 
provide an accurate count of domestic violence incidents, and 
any consequent disciplinary action, that are reported through-
out the Department of Defense. 
(2) ADEQUATE PERSONNEL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
develop a plan to ensure that adequate personnel are available 
to implement recommendations made by the Defense Task 
Force on Domestic Violence. 
(3) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TRAINING DATA FOR CHAPLAINS.— 
The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to collect domestic 
violence training data for chaplains. 
(4) OVERSIGHT
FRAMEWORK.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall develop an oversight framework for Department of 
Defense domestic violence programs, to include oversight of 
implementation of recommendations made by the Defense Task 
Force on Domestic Violence, including budgeting, communica-
tion initiatives, and policy compliance. 
(b) IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation 
report within 90 days of the completion of actions outlined in 
subsection (a). 
Subtitle F—Member Education and Train-
ing Opportunities and Administration 
SEC. 551. ENHANCEMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNDER-
GRADUATE NURSE TRAINING PROGRAM. 
(a) CLARIFICATION OF DEGREE COVERED BY PROGRAM.—Sub-
section (a) of section 2016 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘a nursing degree’’ and inserting ‘‘a bachelor 
of science degree in nursing’’. 
(b) GRADUATION RATES OF TRAINING PROGRAMS.—Subsection 
(b) of such section is amended by inserting ‘‘in nursing’’ after 
‘‘bachelor of science degree’’. 
(c) LOCATION OF PROGRAMS.—Subsection (d) of such section 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(d) LOCATION
OF PROGRAMS.—(1) An academic institution 
selected to operate an undergraduate nurse training program shall 
establish the program at or near a military installation that has 
a military treatment facility designated as a medical center with 
inpatient capability and multiple graduate medical education pro-
grams located on the installation or within reasonable proximity 
to the installation. 
‘‘(2) Before approving a location as the site of an undergraduate 
nurse training program, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct 
an assessment to ensure that the establishment of the program 
at that location will not adversely impact or displace existing nurse 
training programs, either conducted by the Department of Defense 
or by a civilian entity, at the location.’’. 
(d) PILOT PROGRAM.— 
Assessment. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00765
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4220 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) IMPLEMENTATION.—Paragraph (2) of section 525(d) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2287; 10 U.S.C. 2016 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘July 1, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’. 
(2) GRADUATION RATES.—Paragraph (3) of such section is 
amended— 
(A) by striking the ‘‘The pilot program shall achieve’’ 
and inserting ‘‘The goal of the pilot program is to achieve’’; 
and 
(B) by striking ‘‘nurse training program’’ and inserting 
‘‘nurse training programs’’. 
SEC. 552. REPAYMENT OF EDUCATION LOAN REPAYMENT BENEFITS. 
(a) ENLISTED MEMBERS ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SPECIFIED MILITARY 
SPECIALTIES.—Section 2171 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: 
‘‘(g) Except a person described in subsection (e) who transfers 
to service making the person eligible for repayment of loans under 
section 16301 of this title, a member of the armed forces who 
fails to complete the period of service required to qualify for loan 
repayment under this section shall be subject to the repayment 
provisions of section 303a(e) of title 37. 
‘‘(h) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe, by regulations, 
procedures for implementing this section, including standards for 
qualified loans and authorized payees and other terms and condi-
tions for making loan repayments. Such regulations may include 
exceptions that would allow for the payment as a lump sum of 
any loan repayment due to a member under a written agreement 
that existed at the time of a member’s death or disability.’’. 
(b) MEMBERS OF SELECTED RESERVE.—Section 16301 of such 
title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: 
‘‘(h) Except a person described in subsection (e) who transfers 
to service making the person eligible for repayment of loans under 
section 2171 of this title, a member of the armed forces who fails 
to complete the period of service required to qualify for loan repay-
ment under this section shall be subject to the repayment provisions 
of section 303a(e) of title 37. 
‘‘(i) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe, by regulations, 
procedures for implementing this section, including standards for 
qualified loans and authorized payees and other terms and condi-
tions for making loan repayments. Such regulations may include 
exceptions that would allow for the payment as a lump sum of 
any loan repayment due to a member under a written agreement 
that existed at the time of a member’s death or disability.’’. 
SEC. 553. PARTICIPATION OF ARMED FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS 
SCHOLARSHIP AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 
RECIPIENTS IN ACTIVE DUTY HEALTH PROFESSION LOAN 
REPAYMENT PROGRAM. 
Section 2173(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) The person is enrolled in the Armed Forces Health 
Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance Program 
under subchapter I of chapter 105 of this title for a number 
of years less than is required to complete the normal length 
of the course of study required for the health profession con-
cerned.’’. 
Regulations. 
Procedures. 
Standards. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00766
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4221 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 554. ACTIVE DUTY OBLIGATION FOR MILITARY ACADEMY GRAD-
UATES WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE ARMED FORCES HEALTH 
PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 
PROGRAM. 
(a) MILITARY ACADEMY GRADUATES.—Section 4348(a) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) 
or (3) is tendered and the cadet participates in a program 
under section 2121 of this title, the cadet will fulfill any 
unserved obligation incurred under this section on active duty, 
regardless of the type of appointment held, upon completion 
of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred under 
section 2123 of this title for participation in such program.’’. 
(b) NAVAL ACADEMY GRADUATES.—Section 6959(a) of such title 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) 
or (3) is tendered and the midshipman participates in a program 
under section 2121 of this title, the midshipman will fulfill 
any unserved obligation incurred under this section on active 
duty, regardless of the type of appointment held, upon comple-
tion of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred 
under section 2123 of this title for participation in such pro-
gram.’’. 
(c) AIR FORCE ACADEMY GRADUATES.—Section 9348(a) of such 
title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) That if an appointment described in paragraph (2) 
or (3) is tendered and the cadet participates in a program 
under section 2121 of this title, the cadet will fulfill any 
unserved obligation incurred under this section on active duty, 
regardless of the type of appointment held, upon completion 
of, and in addition to, any service obligation incurred under 
section 2123 of this title for participation in such program.’’. 
Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ 
Education 
SEC. 561. ENROLLMENT OF DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES 
WHO 
RESIDE 
IN 
TEMPORARY 
HOUSING 
IN 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
DOMESTIC 
DEPENDENT 
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 
Section 2164(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3)(A) Under the circumstances described in subparagraph (B), 
the Secretary may, at the discretion of the Secretary, permit a 
dependent of a member of the armed forces to enroll in an edu-
cational program provided by the Secretary pursuant to this sub-
section without regard to the requirement in paragraph (1) with 
respect to residence on a military installation. 
‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) applies only if— 
‘‘(i) the dependents reside in temporary housing (regardless 
of whether the temporary housing is on Federal property)— 
‘‘(I) because of the unavailability of adequate perma-
nent living quarters on the military installation to which 
the member is assigned; or 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00767
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4222 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(II) while the member is wounded, ill, or injured; 
and 
‘‘(ii) the Secretary determines that the circumstances of 
such living arrangements justify extending the enrollment 
authority to include the dependents.’’. 
SEC. 562. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDU-
CATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 
(a) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF 
MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.—Of the amount authorized to 
be appropriated for fiscal year 2011 pursuant to section 301(5) 
for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities, 
$30,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing 
assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of 
section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b). 
(b) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH ENROLLMENT CHANGES DUE 
TO
BASE
CLOSURES, FORCE
STRUCTURE
CHANGES, OR
FORCE 
RELOCATIONS.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal year 2011 pursuant to section 301(5) for operation and mainte-
nance for Defense-wide activities, $10,000,000 shall be available 
only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational 
agencies under subsection (b) of section 572 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 
U.S.C. 7703b). 
(c) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 
SEC. 563. IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES. 
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 pursuant to section 301(5) for operation and maintenance 
for Defense-wide activities, $10,000,000 shall be available for pay-
ments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by 
Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a). 
Subtitle H—Decorations and Awards 
SEC. 571. CLARIFICATION OF PERSONS ELIGIBLE FOR AWARD OF 
BRONZE STAR MEDAL. 
(a) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBLE PERSONS.—Section 1133 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 1133. Bronze Star: limitation on persons eligible to receive 
‘‘The decoration known as the ‘Bronze Star’ may only be 
awarded to a member of a military force who— 
‘‘(1) at the time of the events for which the decoration 
is to be awarded, was serving in a geographic area in which 
special pay is authorized under section 310 or paragraph (1) 
or (3) of section 351(a) of title 37; or 
‘‘(2) receives special pay under section 310 or paragraph 
(1) or (3) of section 351(a) of title 37 as a result of those 
events.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00768
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4223 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 1133 and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘1133. Bronze Star: limitation on persons eligible to receive.’’. 
(c) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment made by 
subsection (a) applies to the award of the Bronze Star after October 
30, 2000. 
SEC. 572. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF DISTIN-
GUISHED-SERVICE CROSS TO SHINYEI MATAYOSHI FOR 
ACTS OF VALOR DURING WORLD WAR II. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations 
specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any 
other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals 
to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the 
Army is authorized and requested to award the Distinguished- 
Service Cross under section 3742 of that title to Shinyei Matayoshi 
for the acts of valor referred to in subsection (b). 
(b) ACTS
OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 
to in subsection (a) are the actions of Tech Sergeant Shinyei 
Matayoshi on April 7, 1945, as a member of Company G, 2d Bat-
talion, 442d Regimental Combat Team during World War II. 
SEC. 573. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD OF DISTIN-
GUISHED-SERVICE CROSS TO JAY C. COPLEY FOR ACTS 
OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations 
specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any 
other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals 
to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the 
Army is authorized and requested to award the Distinguished- 
Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to former Captain 
Jay C. Copley of the United States Army for the acts of valor 
during the Vietnam War described in subsection (b). 
(b) ACTS
OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 
to in subsection (a) are the actions of then Captain Jay C. Copley 
on May 5, 1968, as commander of Company C of the 1st Battalion, 
50th Infantry, attached to the 173d Airborne Brigade during an 
engagement with a regimental-size enemy force in Bin Dinh Prov-
ince, South Vietnam. 
SEC. 574. PROGRAM TO COMMEMORATE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE 
KOREAN WAR. 
(a) COMMEMORATIVE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 
Defense may establish and conduct a program to commemorate 
the 60th anniversary of the Korean War (in this section referred 
to as the ‘‘commemorative program’’). In conducting the commemo-
rative program, the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate and sup-
port other programs and activities of the Federal Government, 
State and local governments, and other persons and organizations 
in commemoration of the Korean War. 
(b) SCHEDULE.—If the Secretary of Defense establishes the 
commemorative program, the Secretary shall determine the 
schedule of major events and priority of efforts for the commemora-
tive program to achieve the commemorative objectives specified 
Determination. 
10 USC 113 note. 
10 USC 1133 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00769
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4224 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
in subsection (c). The Secretary of Defense may establish a com-
mittee to assist the Secretary in determining the schedule and 
conducting the commemorative program. 
(c) 
COMMEMORATIVE
ACTIVITIES
AND
OBJECTIVES.—The 
commemorative program may include activities and ceremonies to 
achieve the following objectives: 
(1) To thank and honor veterans of the Korean War, 
including members of the Armed Forces who were held as 
prisoners of war or listed as missing in action, for their service 
and sacrifice on behalf of the United States. 
(2) To thank and honor the families of veterans of the 
Korean War for their sacrifices and contributions, especially 
families who lost a loved one in the Korean War. 
(3) To highlight the service of the Armed Forces during 
the Korean War and the contributions of Federal agencies 
and governmental and non-governmental organizations that 
served with, or in support of, the Armed Forces. 
(4) To pay tribute to the sacrifices and contributions made 
on the home front by the people of the United States during 
the Korean War. 
(5) To provide the people of the United States with a 
clear understanding and appreciation of the lessons and history 
of the Korean War. 
(6) To highlight the advances in technology, science, and 
medicine related to military research conducted during the 
Korean War. 
(7) To recognize the contributions and sacrifices made by 
the allies of the United States during the Korean War. 
(d) USE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA KOREAN WAR 
COMMEMORATION AND SYMBOLS.—Subsection (c) of section 1083 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public 
Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1918), as amended by section 1067 of the 
Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 112 Stat. 2134) and section 1052 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 
(Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 764), shall apply to the commemora-
tive program. 
(e) COMMEMORATIVE FUND.— 
(1) ESTABLISHMENT
OF
NEW
ACCOUNT.—If the Secretary 
of Defense establishes the commemorative program, the Sec-
retary the Treasury shall establish in the Treasury of the 
United States an account to be known as the ‘‘Department 
of Defense Korean War Commemoration Fund’’ (in this section 
referred to as the ‘‘Fund’’). 
(2) ADMINISTRATION AND USE OF FUND.—The Fund shall 
be available to, and administered by, the Secretary of Defense. 
The Secretary of Defense shall use the assets of the Fund 
only for the purpose of conducting the commemorative program 
and shall prescribe such regulations regarding the use of the 
Fund as the Secretary of Defense considers to be necessary. 
(3) DEPOSITS.—There shall be deposited into the Fund the 
following: 
(A) Amounts appropriated to the Fund. 
(B) Proceeds derived from the use by the Secretary 
of Defense of the exclusive rights described in subsection 
(c) of section 1083 of the National Defense Authorization 
Regulations. 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00770
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4225 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 
1918). 
(C) Donations made in support of the commemorative 
program by private and corporate donors. 
(4) AVAILABILITY.—Subject to paragraph (5), amounts in 
the Fund shall remain available until expended. 
(5) TREATMENT
OF
UNOBLIGATED
FUNDS; TRANSFER.—If 
unobligated amounts remain in the Fund as of September 30, 
2013, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer the remaining 
amounts to the Department of Defense Vietnam War 
Commemorative Fund established pursuant to section 598(e) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 
(Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 113 note). The transferred 
amounts shall be merged with, and available for the same 
purposes as, other amounts in the Department of Defense 
Vietnam War Commemorative Fund. 
(f) ACCEPTANCE OF VOLUNTARY SERVICES.— 
(1) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT SERVICES.—Notwithstanding sec-
tion 1342 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Defense may accept from any person voluntary services to 
be provided in furtherance of the commemorative program. 
The Secretary of Defense shall prohibit the solicitation of any 
voluntary services if the nature or circumstances of such solici-
tation would compromise the integrity or the appearance of 
integrity of any program of the Department of Defense or 
of any individual involved in the program. 
(2) COMPENSATION FOR WORK-RELATED INJURY.—A person 
providing voluntary services under this subsection shall be 
considered to be a Federal employee for purposes of chapter 
81 of title 5, United States Code, relating to compensation 
for work-related injuries. The person shall also be considered 
a special governmental employee for purposes of standards 
of conduct and sections 202, 203, 205, 207, 208, and 209 of 
title 18, United States Code. A person who is not otherwise 
employed by the Federal Government shall not be considered 
to be a Federal employee for any other purpose by reason 
of the provision of voluntary services under this subsection. 
(3) REIMBURSEMENT OF INCIDENTAL EXPENSES.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may provide for reimbursement of incidental 
expenses incurred by a person providing voluntary services 
under this subsection. The Secretary of Defense shall determine 
which expenses are eligible for reimbursement under this para-
graph. 
(g) REPORT REQUIRED.—If the Secretary of Defense conducts 
the commemorative program, the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense shall submit to Congress, not later than 60 days 
after the end of the commemorative program, a report containing 
an accounting of— 
(1) all of the funds deposited into and expended from the 
Fund; 
(2) any other funds expended under this section; and 
(3) any unobligated funds remaining in the Fund as of 
September 30, 2013, that are transferred to the Department 
of Defense Vietnam War Commemorative Fund pursuant to 
subsection (e)(5). 
(h) LIMITATION
ON
EXPENDITURES.—Using amounts appro-
priated to the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00771
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4226 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
may not expend more than $5,000,000 to carry out the commemora-
tive program. 
Subtitle I—Military Family Readiness 
Matters 
SEC. 581. APPOINTMENT OF ADDITIONAL MEMBERS OF DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE MILITARY FAMILY READINESS COUNCIL. 
(a) INCLUSION OF SPOUSE OF GENERAL OR FLAG OFFICER.— 
Subsection (b) of section 1781a of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subpara-
graph (F); and 
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following 
new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) The spouse of a general or flag officer.’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘subparagraphs (C) and 
(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E)’’. 
(b) INCLUSION OF DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT 
FOR MILITARY FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.—Subsection (b)(1) 
of such section is further amended by adding at the end the fol-
lowing new subparagraph: 
‘‘(G) The Director of the Office of Community Support for 
Military Families With Special Needs.’’. 
(c) CLARIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OPTIONS
FOR EXISTING 
MEMBER.—Subparagraph (F) of subsection (b)(1) of such section, 
as redesignated by subsection (a)(1)(A), is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘(F) In addition to the representatives appointed under 
subparagraphs (B) and (C), the senior enlisted advisor, or the 
spouse of a senior enlisted member, from each of the Army, 
Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force.’’. 
(d) APPOINTMENT BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Subsection (b) 
of such section is further amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘, who shall be 
appointed by the Secretary of Defense’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘, who shall be 
appointed by the Secretary of Defense’’ both places it 
appears; and 
(C) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘by the Secretary 
of Defense’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall appoint the members of 
the Council required by subparagraphs (B) through (F) of paragraph 
(1).’’. 
SEC. 582. ENHANCEMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR MILITARY 
FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. 
(a) DIRECTOR
OF
THE OFFICE
OF COMMUNITY SUPPORT
FOR 
MILITARY FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.—Subsection (c) of section 
1781c of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) DIRECTOR.—(1) The head of the Office shall be the Director 
of the Office of Community Support for Military Families With 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00772
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4227 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Special Needs, who shall be a member of the Senior Executive 
Service or a general officer or flag officer. 
‘‘(2) In the discharge of the responsibilities of the Office, the 
Director shall be subject to the supervision, direction, and control 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.’’. 
(b) ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
FOR OFFICE.—Subsection (d) 
of such section is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new para-
graph (7): 
‘‘(7) To conduct periodic reviews of best practices in the 
United States in the provision of medical and educational serv-
ices for children with special needs.’’. 
(c) ENHANCEMENT OF SUPPORT.—Section 563 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2304) is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub-
sections: 
‘‘(c) MILITARY DEPARTMENT SUPPORT FOR LOCAL CENTERS TO 
ASSIST MILITARY CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.—The Secretary 
of a military department may establish or support centers on or 
in the vicinity of military installations under the jurisdiction of 
such Secretary to coordinate and provide medical and educational 
services for children with special needs of members of the Armed 
Forces who are assigned to such installations. 
‘‘(d) ADVISORY PANEL ON COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR MILITARY 
FAMILIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary of 
Defense shall establish an advisory panel on community support 
for military families with special needs. 
‘‘(2) MEMBERS.—The advisory panel shall consist of seven 
individuals who are a member of a military family with special 
needs. The Secretary of Defense shall appoint the members 
of the advisory panel. 
‘‘(3) DUTIES.—The advisory panel shall— 
‘‘(A) provide informed advice to the Director of the 
Office of Community Support for Military Families With 
Special Needs on the implementation of the policy required 
by subsection (e) of section 1781c of title 10, United States 
Code, and on the discharge of the programs required by 
subsection (f) of such section; 
‘‘(B) assess and provide information to the Director 
on services and support for children with special needs 
that is available from other departments and agencies of 
the Federal Government and from State and local govern-
ments; and 
‘‘(C) otherwise advise and assist the Director in the 
discharge of the duties of the Office of Community Support 
for Military Families With Special Needs in such manner 
as the Secretary of Defense and the Director jointly deter-
mine appropriate. 
‘‘(4) MEETINGS.—The Director shall meet with the advisory 
panel at such times, and with such frequency, as the Director 
considers appropriate. The Director shall meet with the panel 
Deadline. 
Appointment. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 1781c 
note. 
10 USC 1781c. 
10 USC 1781c. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00773
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4228 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
at least once each year. The Director may meet with the panel 
through teleconferencing or by other electronic means.’’. 
SEC. 583. MODIFICATION OF YELLOW RIBBON REINTEGRATION PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) OFFICE FOR REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.—Subsection (d)(1) 
of section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘The Under’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Under’’; and 
(2) in the last sentence— 
(A) by striking ‘‘The office may also’’ and inserting 
the following: 
‘‘(B) PARTNERSHIPS AND ACCESS.—The office may’’; 
(B) by inserting ‘‘and the Department of Veterans 
Affairs’’ after ‘‘Administration’’; and 
(C) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
‘‘Service and State-based programs may provide access to 
curriculum, training, and support for services to members 
and families from all components.’’. 
(b) CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN REINTEGRATION.—Subsection 
(d)(2) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The Center shall develop and implement a process 
for evaluating the effectiveness of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration 
Program in supporting the health and well-being of members of 
the Armed Forces and their families throughout the deployment 
cycle described in subsection (g).’’. 
(c) STATE DEPLOYMENT CYCLE SUPPORT TEAMS.—Subsection 
(f)(3) of such section is amended by inserting ‘‘and community- 
based organizations’’ after ‘‘service providers’’. 
(d) OPERATION OF PROGRAM DURING DEPLOYMENT AND POST- 
DEPLOYMENT-RECONSTITUTION PHASES.—Subsection (g) of such sec-
tion is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘and to decrease the 
isolation of families during deployment’’ after ‘‘combat zone’’; 
and 
(2) in paragraph (5)(A), by inserting ‘‘, providing informa-
tion on employment opportunities,’’ after ‘‘communities’’. 
(e) ADDITIONAL OUTREACH SERVICE.—Subsection (h) of such 
section, as amended by section 595(1) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2338), is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph: 
‘‘(15) Resiliency training to promote comprehensive pro-
grams for members of the Armed Forces to build mental and 
emotional resiliency for successfully meeting the demands of 
the deployment cycle.’’. 
SEC. 584. EXPANSION AND CONTINUATION OF JOINT FAMILY SUPPORT 
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 
Section 675 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 119 Stat. 2273; 
10 U.S.C. 1781 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘not more than’’ and inserting ‘‘not 
less than’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Up to’’ and inserting ‘‘At least’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00774
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4229 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘at the end of the three- 
year period beginning on the date on which funds are first 
obligated for the program’’ and inserting ‘‘on December 31, 
2012’’. 
SEC. 585. REPORT ON MILITARY SPOUSE EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry 
out a review of all education programs of the Department of Defense 
and Department of Veterans Affairs designed to support spouses 
of members of the Armed Forces. 
(b) ELEMENTS OF REVIEW.—At a minimum, the review shall 
evaluate the following: 
(1) All education programs of the Department of Defense 
and Department of Veterans Affairs that are in place to advance 
educational opportunities for military spouses. 
(2) The efficacy and effectiveness of such education pro-
grams. 
(3) The extent to which the availability of educational 
opportunities for military spouses influences the decisions of 
members to remain in the Armed Forces. 
(4) A comparison of the costs associated with providing 
military spouse education opportunities as an incentive to 
retain members rather than recruiting or training new mem-
bers. 
(c) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report con-
taining— 
(1) the results of the review; and 
(2) such recommendations as the Secretary considers nec-
essary for improving military spouse education programs. 
(d) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the review and preparing 
the report, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs regarding education programs of Department 
of Veterans Affairs assisting spouses of members of the Armed 
Forces. 
SEC. 586. REPORT ON ENHANCING BENEFITS AVAILABLE FOR MILI-
TARY DEPENDENT CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL EDUCATION 
NEEDS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than September 30, 2011, 
the Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the Committees on 
Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a 
report describing the needs of military families with children with 
special education needs and evaluating options to enhance the 
benefits available to such families and children under the Individ-
uals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) in 
meeting such needs. 
(b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare 
the report in consultation with the Secretary of Education. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—In preparing the report, the Secretary of 
Defense shall— 
(1) identify and assess obstacles faced by military families 
with children with special education needs in obtaining a free 
appropriate public education to address such needs; 
(2) identify and assess evidence-based research and best 
practices for providing special education and related services 
(as those terms are defined in section 602 of the Individuals 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00775
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4230 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401)) for military 
children with special education needs; 
(3) assess timeliness in obtaining special education and 
related services described in paragraph (2); 
(4) determine and document the cost associated with 
obtaining special education and related services described in 
paragraph (2); 
(5) assess the feasibility of establishing an individualized 
education program for military children with special education 
needs that is applicable across jurisdictions of local educational 
agencies in order to achieve reciprocity among States in 
acknowledging such programs; 
(6) identify means of improving oversight and compliance 
with the requirements of section 614 of the Individuals with 
Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1414) relating to a local 
educational agency supporting an existing individualized edu-
cation program for a child with special education needs who 
is relocating to another State pursuant to the permanent change 
of station of a military parent until an individualized education 
program is developed and approved for such child in the State 
to which the child relocates; 
(7) assess the feasibility of establishing an expedited 
process for resolution of complaints by military parents with 
a child with special education needs about lack of access to 
education and related services otherwise specified in the 
individualized education program of the child; 
(8) assess the feasibility of permitting the Department of 
Defense to contact the State to which a military family with 
a child with special education needs will relocate pursuant 
to a permanent change of station when the orders for such 
change of station are issued, but before the family takes resi-
dence in such State, for the purpose of commencing preparation 
for education and related services specified in the individualized 
education program of the child; 
(9) assess the feasibility of establishing a system within 
the Department of Defense to document complaints by military 
parents regarding access to free and appropriate public edu-
cation for their children with special education needs; 
(10) identify means to strengthen the monitoring and over-
sight of special education and related services for military 
children with special education needs under the Interstate Com-
pact on Educational Opportunities for Military Children; and 
(11) consider such other matters as the Secretary of Defense 
and the Secretary of Education jointly consider appropriate. 
SEC. 587. REPORTS ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS AND FINAN-
CIAL ASSISTANCE FOR CHILD CARE FOR MEMBERS OF THE 
ARMED FORCES. 
(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than six months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, and every two years thereafter, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report 
on Department of Defense child development centers and financial 
assistance for child care provided by the Department of Defense 
off-installation to members of the Armed Forces. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—Each report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following, current as of the date of such report: 
10 USC 1791 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00776
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4231 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) The number of child development centers currently 
located on military installations. 
(2) The number of dependents of members of the Armed 
Forces utilizing such child development centers. 
(3) The number of dependents of members of the Armed 
Forces that are unable to utilize such child development centers 
due to capacity limitations. 
(4) The types of financial assistance available for child 
care provided by the Department of Defense off-installation 
to members of the Armed Forces (including eligible members 
of the reserve components). 
(5) The extent to which members of the Armed Forces 
are utilizing such financial assistance for child care off-installa-
tion. 
(6) The methods by which the Department of Defense 
reaches out to eligible military families to increase awareness 
of the availability of such financial assistance. 
(7) The formulas used to calculate the amount of such 
financial assistance provided to members of the Armed Forces. 
(8) The funding available for such financial assistance in 
the Department of Defense and in the military departments. 
(9) The barriers to access, if any, to such financial assist-
ance faced by members of the Armed Forces, including whether 
standards and criteria of the Department of Defense for child 
care off-installation may affect access to child care. 
(10) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate 
in connection with such report, including with respect to the 
enhancement of access to Department of Defense child care 
development centers and financial assistance for child care 
off-installation for members of the Armed Forces. 
Subtitle J—Other Matters 
SEC. 591. AUTHORITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND COAST GUARD CIVILIAN 
EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILIES TO ACCEPT GIFTS 
FROM NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES. 
(a) CODIFICATION AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING AUTHORITY TO 
COVER ADDITIONAL MEMBERS
AND EMPLOYEES.—Chapter 155 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 
2601 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 2601a. Direct acceptance of gifts by members of the armed 
forces and Department of Defense and Coast 
Guard employees and their families 
‘‘(a) REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS.—(1) The 
Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in 
the case of the Coast Guard) shall issue regulations to provide 
that, subject to such limitations as may be specified in such regula-
tions, the following individuals may accept gifts from nonprofit 
organizations, private parties, and other sources outside the Depart-
ment of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security: 
‘‘(A) A member of the armed forces described in subsection 
(b). 
‘‘(B) A civilian employee of the Department of Defense 
or Coast Guard described in subsection (c). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00777
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4232 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) The family members of such a member or employee. 
‘‘(D) Survivors of such a member or employee who is killed. 
‘‘(2) The regulations required by this subsection shall— 
‘‘(A) apply uniformly to all elements of the Department 
of Defense and, to the maximum extent feasible, to the Coast 
Guard; and 
‘‘(B) require review and approval by a designated agency 
ethics official before acceptance of a gift to ensure that accept-
ance of the gift complies with the Joint Ethics Regulation. 
‘‘(b) COVERED MEMBERS.—This section applies to a member 
of the armed forces who, while performing active duty, full-time 
National Guard duty, or inactive-duty training on or after Sep-
tember 11, 2001, incurred an injury or illness— 
‘‘(1) as described in section 1413a(e)(2) of this title; or 
‘‘(2) under other circumstances determined by the Secretary 
concerned to warrant treatment analogous to members covered 
by paragraph (1). 
‘‘(c) COVERED EMPLOYEES.—This section applies to a civilian 
employee of the Department of Defense or Coast Guard who, while 
an employee on or after September 11, 2001, incurred an injury 
or illness under a circumstance described in paragraph (1) or (2) 
of subsection (c). 
‘‘(d) GIFTS FROM CERTAIN SOURCES PROHIBITED.—The regula-
tions issued under subsection (a) may not authorize the acceptance 
of a gift from a foreign government or international organization 
or their agents.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to section 2601 the following new item: 
‘‘2601a. Direct acceptance of gifts by members of the armed forces and Department 
of Defense and Coast Guard employees and their families.’’. 
SEC. 592. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF PRIVATE SECTOR CIVILIANS 
AUTHORIZED FOR ADMISSION TO NATIONAL DEFENSE 
UNIVERSITY. 
Section 2167(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘20 full-time student positions’’ and inserting ‘‘35 full- 
time student positions’’. 
SEC. 593. ADMISSION OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY CIVILIANS TO ATTEND 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ADMISSION AUTHORITY.—Chapter 901 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 9314 the fol-
lowing new section: 
‘‘§ 9314a. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: 
admission of defense industry civilians 
‘‘(a) ADMISSION AUTHORIZED.—(1) The Secretary of the Air Force 
may permit defense industry employees described in subsection 
(b) to receive instruction at the United States Air Force Institute 
of Technology in accordance with this section. Any such defense 
industry employee may be enrolled in, and may be provided instruc-
tion in, a program leading to a graduate degree in a defense 
focused curriculum related to aeronautics and astronautics, elec-
trical and computer engineering, engineering physics, mathematics 
and statistics, operational sciences, or systems and engineering 
management. 
Applicability. 
Applicability. 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00778
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4233 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(2) No more than 125 defense industry employees may be 
enrolled at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology 
at any one time under the authority of paragraph (1). 
‘‘(3) Upon successful completion of the course of instruction 
at the United States Air Force Institute of Technology in which 
a defense industry employee is enrolled, the defense industry 
employee may be awarded an appropriate degree under section 
9314 of this title. 
‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE DEFENSE INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES.—For purposes 
of this section, an eligible defense industry employee is an individual 
employed by a private firm that is engaged in providing to the 
Department of Defense significant and substantial defense-related 
systems, products, or services. A defense industry employee 
admitted for instruction at the United States Air Force Institute 
of Technology remains eligible for such instruction only so long 
at that person remains employed by the same firm. 
‘‘(c) ANNUAL DETERMINATION BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR 
FORCE.—Defense industry employees may receive instruction at 
the United States Air Force Institute of Technology during any 
academic year only if, before the start of that academic year, the 
Secretary of the Air Force, or the designee of the Secretary, deter-
mines that providing instruction to defense industry employees 
under this section during that year— 
‘‘(1) will further the military mission of the United States 
Air Force Institute of Technology; and 
‘‘(2) will be done on a space-available basis and not require 
an increase in the size of the faculty of the school, an increase 
in the course offerings of the school, or an increase in the 
laboratory facilities or other infrastructure of the school. 
‘‘(d) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary of the Air Force 
shall ensure that— 
‘‘(1) the curriculum in which defense industry employees 
may be enrolled under this section is not readily available 
through other schools and concentrates on the areas of focus 
specified in subsection (a)(1) that are conducted by military 
organizations and defense contractors working in close coopera-
tion; and 
‘‘(2) the course offerings at the United States Air Force 
Institute of Technology continue to be determined solely by 
the needs of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(e) TUITION.—(1) The United States Air Force Institute of 
Technology shall charge tuition for students enrolled under this 
section at a rate not less than the rate charged for employees 
of the United States outside the Department of the Air Force. 
‘‘(2) Amounts received by the United States Air Force Institute 
of Technology for instruction of students enrolled under this section 
shall be retained by the school to defray the costs of such instruc-
tion. The source, and the disposition, of such funds shall be specifi-
cally identified in records of the school. 
‘‘(f) STANDARDS OF CONDUCT.—While receiving instruction at 
the United States Air Force Institute of Technology, defense 
industry employees enrolled under this section, to the extent prac-
ticable, are subject to the same regulations governing academic 
performance, attendance, norms of behavior, and enrollment as 
apply to Government civilian employees receiving instruction at 
the school.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00779
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4234 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to section 9314 the following new item: 
‘‘9314a. United States Air Force Institute of Technology: admission of defense indus-
try civilians.’’. 
SEC. 594. UPDATED TERMINOLOGY FOR ARMY MEDICAL SERVICE 
CORPS. 
Paragraph (5) of section 3068 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Pharmacy, Supply, 
and Administration’’ and inserting ‘‘Administrative Health 
Services’’; 
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘Sanitary Engineering’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Preventive Medicine Sciences’’; and 
(3) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘Optometry’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Clinical Health Sciences’’. 
SEC. 595. DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE STARBASE PROGRAM. 
Section 2193b(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘90 days after the end of each fiscal year’’ and inserting 
‘‘March 31 of each year’’. 
SEC. 596. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF FINAL 
REPORT OF MILITARY LEADERSHIP DIVERSITY COMMIS-
SION. 
Section 596(e)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4478) is amended by striking ‘‘12 months’’ and inserting ‘‘18 
months’’. 
TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER 
PERSONNEL BENEFITS 
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 
Sec. 601. Ineligibility of certain Federal civilian employees for Reservist income re-
placement payments on account of availability of comparable benefits 
under another program. 
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for re-
serve forces. 
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 
care professionals. 
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear offi-
cers. 
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 
pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bo-
nuses and special pays. 
Sec. 616. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of referral bonuses. 
Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 
Sec. 621. Extension of authority to provide travel and transportation allowances for 
inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances. 
Sec. 622. Travel and transportation allowances for attendance at Yellow Ribbon Re-
integration events. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00780
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4235 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay and Survivor Benefits 
Sec. 631. Elimination of cap on retired pay multiplier for members with greater 
than 30 years of service who retire for disability. 
Sec. 632. Payment date for retired and retainer pay. 
Sec. 633. Clarification of effect of ordering reserve component member to active 
duty to receive authorized medical care on reducing eligibility age for re-
ceipt of non-regular service retired pay. 
Sec. 634. Conformity of special compensation for members with injuries or illnesses 
requiring assistance in everyday living with monthly personal caregiver 
stipend under Department of Veterans Affairs program of comprehen-
sive assistance for family caregivers. 
Sec. 635. Sense of Congress concerning age and service requirements for retired 
pay for non-regular service. 
Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 
Operations 
Sec. 641. Addition of definition of morale, welfare, and recreation telephone serv-
ices for use in contracts to provide such services for military personnel 
serving in combat zones. 
Sec. 642. Feasibility study on establishment of full exchange store in the Northern 
Mariana Islands. 
Sec. 643. Continuation of commissary and exchange operations at Brunswick Naval 
Air Station, Maine. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 651. Report on basic allowance for housing for personnel assigned to sea duty. 
Sec. 652. Report on savings from enhanced management of special pay for aviation 
career officers extending period of active duty. 
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 
SEC. 601. INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 
FOR RESERVIST INCOME REPLACEMENT PAYMENTS ON 
ACCOUNT OF AVAILABILITY OF COMPARABLE BENEFITS 
UNDER ANOTHER PROGRAM. 
(a) INELIGIBILITY FOR PAYMENTS.—Section 910(b) of title 37, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) A civilian employee of the Federal Government who is 
also a member of a reserve component is not entitled to a payment 
under this section for any period for which the employee is entitled 
to— 
‘‘(A) a differential payment under section 5538 of title 5; 
or 
‘‘(B) a comparable benefit under an administratively estab-
lished program for civilian employees absent from a position 
of employment with the Federal Government in order to per-
form active duty in the uniformed services.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (b)(3) of section 910 of title 
37, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to payments under such section for months beginning 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
37 USC 910 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00781
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4236 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and 
Incentive Pays 
SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 
PAY AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES. 
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlist-
ment bonus. 
(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation 
or enlistment bonus. 
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted 
members assigned to certain high-priority units. 
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 
bonus for persons without prior service. 
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 
and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment 
and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 
(7) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 
for reserve component members experiencing extended and fre-
quent mobilization for active duty service. 
SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 
PAY AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 
(a) TITLE 10 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 10, 
United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate 
accession program. 
(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education 
loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected 
Reserve. 
(b) TITLE 37 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 37, 
United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention 
bonuses for psychologists. 
(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for reg-
istered nurses. 
(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for 
nurse anesthetists. 
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected 
Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime special-
ties. 
(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental 
officers. 
(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy 
officers. 
(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical 
officers in critically short wartime specialties. 
(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental 
specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00782
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4237 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS 
AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS. 
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-quali-
fied officers extending period of active service. 
(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession 
bonus. 
(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incen-
tive bonus. 
SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 
37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 
BONUS AUTHORITIES. 
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for 
enlisted members. 
(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for 
officers. 
(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive 
pay authorities for nuclear officers. 
(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive 
pay and bonus authorities for officers. 
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive 
pay authorities for officers in health professions. 
(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. 
(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special 
duty pay. 
(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or pro-
ficiency bonus. 
(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for mem-
bers qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high 
priority units. 
SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAY-
MENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL PAYS. 
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 
bonus. 
(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. 
(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active 
members. 
(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. 
(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new offi-
cers in critical skills. 
(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion 
to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. 
(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer 
between armed forces. 
(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer 
candidates. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00783
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4238 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAY-
MENT OF REFERRAL BONUSES. 
The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are 
amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 
31, 2011’’: 
(1) Section 1030(i), relating to health professions referral 
bonus. 
(2) Section 3252(h), relating to Army referral bonus. 
Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation 
Allowances 
SEC. 621. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TRAVEL AND 
TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES FOR INACTIVE DUTY 
TRAINING OUTSIDE OF NORMAL COMMUTING DISTANCES. 
Section 408a(e) of title 37, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 
SEC. 622. TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES FOR ATTEND-
ANCE AT YELLOW RIBBON REINTEGRATION EVENTS. 
(a) PAYMENT OF TRAVEL COSTS AUTHORIZED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 37, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after section 411k the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 411l. Travel and transportation allowances: attendance of 
members and other persons at Yellow Ribbon Re-
integration Program events 
‘‘(a) ALLOWANCES AUTHORIZED.—(1) Under uniform regulations 
prescribed by the Secretaries concerned, a member of the uniformed 
services authorized to attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Pro-
gram event may be provided travel and transportation allowances 
in order that the member may attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration 
Program event. 
‘‘(2) Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretaries 
concerned, travel and transportation allowances may be provided 
for a person designated pursuant to subsection (b) in order for 
the person to accompany a member in attending a Yellow Ribbon 
Reintegration Program event if the Secretary concerned determines 
that the presence of the person at the event may contribute to 
the purposes of the event for the member. 
‘‘(b) DESIGNATION
OF PERSONS ELIGIBLE
FOR ALLOWANCE.— 
A member of the uniformed services who is eligible to attend a 
Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program event may designate one 
or more persons, including another member of the uniformed serv-
ices, for purposes of receiving travel and transportation allowances 
described in subsection (c) to attend a Yellow Ribbon Reintegration 
Program event. The designation of a person for purposes of this 
section shall be made in writing and may be changed at any 
time. 
‘‘(c) AUTHORIZED
TRAVEL
AND
TRANSPORTATION.—(1) The 
transportation authorized by subsection (a) is round-trip transpor-
tation between the home or place of business of the authorized 
person and the location of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program 
event. 
Regulations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00784
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4239 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(2) In addition to transportation under paragraph (1), the 
Secretary concerned may provide a per diem allowance or 
reimbursement for the actual and necessary expenses of the travel, 
or a combination thereof, but not to exceed the rates established 
under section 404(d) of this title. 
‘‘(3) The transportation authorized by paragraph (1) may be 
provided by any of the following means: 
‘‘(A) Transportation in-kind. 
‘‘(B) A monetary allowance in place of transportation in- 
kind at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretaries concerned. 
‘‘(C) Reimbursement for the commercial cost of transpor-
tation. 
‘‘(4) An allowance payable under this subsection may be paid 
in advance. 
‘‘(5) Reimbursement payable under this subsection may not 
exceed the cost of Government-procured commercial round-trip air 
travel. 
‘‘(d) 
YELLOW
RIBBON
REINTEGRATION
PROGRAM
EVENT 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘Yellow Ribbon Reintegration 
Program event’ means an event authorized under section 582 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note).’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
item related to section 411k the following new item: 
‘‘411l. Travel and transportation allowances: attendance of members and other per-
sons at Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program events.’’. 
(b) APPLICABILITY.—No reimbursement may be provided under 
section 411l of title 37, United States Code, as added by subsection 
(a), for travel and transportation costs incurred before September 
30, 2010. 
Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay and 
Survivor Benefits 
SEC. 631. ELIMINATION OF CAP ON RETIRED PAY MULTIPLIER FOR 
MEMBERS WITH GREATER THAN 30 YEARS OF SERVICE 
WHO RETIRE FOR DISABILITY. 
(a) COMPUTATION
OF
RETIRED
PAY.—The table in section 
1401(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in the column designated ‘‘Column 2’’, by inserting 
‘‘, not to exceed 75%,’’ after ‘‘percentage of disability’’ both 
places it appears; and 
(2) by striking column 4. 
(b) RECOMPUTATION OF RETIRED OR RETAINER PAY TO REFLECT 
LATER ACTIVE DUTY OF MEMBERS WHO FIRST BECAME MEMBERS 
BEFORE SEPTEMBER 8, 1980.—The table in section 1402(d) of such 
title is amended— 
(1) in the column designated ‘‘Column 2’’, by inserting 
‘‘, not to exceed 75%,’’ after ‘‘percentage of disability’’; and 
(2) by striking column 4. 
(c) RECOMPUTATION OF RETIRED OR RETAINER PAY TO REFLECT 
LATER ACTIVE DUTY OF MEMBERS WHO FIRST BECAME MEMBERS 
AFTER SEPTEMBER 7, 1980.—The table in section 1402a(d) of such 
title is amended— 
37 USC 411l 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00785
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4240 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) in the column designated ‘‘Column 2’’, by inserting 
‘‘, not to exceed 75 percent,’’ after ‘‘percentage of disability’’; 
and 
(2) by striking column 4. 
(d) APPLICATION
OF AMENDMENTS.—The tables in sections 
1401(a), 1402(d), and 1402a(d) of title 10, United States Code, 
as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this 
Act, shall continue to apply to the computation or recomputation 
of retired or retainer pay for persons who first became entitled 
to retired or retainer pay under subtitle A of such title on or 
before the date of the enactment of this Act. The amendments 
made by this section shall apply only with respect to persons 
who first become entitled to retired or retainer pay under such 
subtitle after that date. 
SEC. 632. PAYMENT DATE FOR RETIRED AND RETAINER PAY. 
(a) SETTING PAYMENT DATE.—Section 1412 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Amounts’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) ROUNDING.— 
Amounts’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(b) PAYMENT DATE.—Amounts of retired pay and retainer pay 
due a retired member of the uniformed services shall be paid 
on the first day of each month beginning after the month in which 
the right to such pay accrues.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 1412. Administrative provisions’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 71 of such title is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 1412 and inserting the following new 
item: 
‘‘1412. Administrative provisions.’’. 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (b) of section 1412 of title 
10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
beginning with the first month that begins more than 30 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 633. CLARIFICATION OF EFFECT OF ORDERING RESERVE COMPO-
NENT MEMBER TO ACTIVE DUTY TO RECEIVE AUTHORIZED 
MEDICAL CARE ON REDUCING ELIGIBILITY AGE FOR 
RECEIPT OF NON-REGULAR SERVICE RETIRED PAY. 
Section 12731(f)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 
‘‘(iii) If a member described in subparagraph (A) is wounded 
or otherwise injured or becomes ill while serving on active duty 
pursuant to a call or order to active duty under a provision of 
law referred to in the first sentence of clause (i) or in clause 
(ii), and the member is then ordered to active duty under section 
12301(h)(1) of this title to receive medical care for the wound, 
injury, or illness, each day of active duty under that order for 
medical care shall be treated as a continuation of the original 
call or order to active duty for purposes of reducing the eligibility 
age of the member under this paragraph.’’. 
10 USC 1412 
note. 
10 USC 1401 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00786
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4241 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 634. CONFORMITY OF SPECIAL COMPENSATION FOR MEMBERS 
WITH INJURIES OR ILLNESSES REQUIRING ASSISTANCE 
IN EVERYDAY LIVING WITH MONTHLY PERSONAL CARE-
GIVER STIPEND UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
AFFAIRS PROGRAM OF COMPREHENSIVE ASSISTANCE FOR 
FAMILY CAREGIVERS. 
Subsection (c) of section 439 of title 37, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(c) AMOUNT.—The amount of monthly special compensation 
payable to a member under subsection (a) shall be the amount 
as follows: 
‘‘(1) The monthly amount of aid and attendance payable 
under section 1114(r)(2) of title 38. 
‘‘(2) Upon the establishment by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs pursuant to subparagraph (C) of section 1720G(a)(3) 
of title 38 of the schedule of monthly personal caregiver stipends 
under the Department of Veterans Affairs program of com-
prehensive assistance for family caregivers under subparagraph 
(A)(ii)(V) of such section, the monthly personal caregiver stipend 
payable with respect to similarly circumstanced veterans under 
such schedule, rather than the amount specified in paragraph 
(1).’’. 
SEC. 635. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING AGE AND SERVICE 
REQUIREMENTS FOR RETIRED PAY FOR NON-REGULAR 
SERVICE. 
It is the sense of Congress that— 
(1) the amendments made to section 12731 of title 10, 
United States Code, by section 647 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 
122 Stat. 160) were intended to reduce the minimum age at 
which members of a reserve component of the Armed Forces 
would begin receiving retired pay according to time spent 
deployed, by three months for every 90-day period spent on 
active duty over the course of a career, rather than limiting 
qualifying time to such periods wholly served within the same 
fiscal year, as interpreted by the Department of Defense; and 
(2) steps should be taken by the Department of Defense 
to implement the congressional intent outlined in paragraph 
(1). 
Subtitle 
E—Commissary 
and 
Non-
appropriated Fund Instrumentality Ben-
efits and Operations 
SEC. 641. ADDITION OF DEFINITION OF MORALE, WELFARE, AND 
RECREATION TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR USE IN CON-
TRACTS TO PROVIDE SUCH SERVICES FOR MILITARY PER-
SONNEL SERVING IN COMBAT ZONES. 
Section 885 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 265; 10 U.S.C. 2304 
note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(c) MORALE, WELFARE, AND RECREATION TELEPHONE SERVICES 
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘morale, welfare, and recreation 
telephone services’ means unofficial telephone calling center services 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00787
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4242 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
supporting calling centers provided by the Army and Air Force 
Exchange Service, Navy Exchange Service Command, Marine Corps 
exchanges, or any other nonappropriated fund instrumentality of 
the United States under the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces which 
is conducted for the comfort, pleasure, contentment, or physical 
or mental improvement of members of the Armed Forces.’’. 
SEC. 
642. 
FEASIBILITY 
STUDY 
ON 
ESTABLISHMENT 
OF 
FULL 
EXCHANGE STORE IN THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a 
report containing the results of a study to determine the feasibility 
of replacing the ‘‘Shoppette’’ of the Army and Air Force Exchange 
Service in the Northern Mariana Islands with a full-service 
exchange store. 
SEC. 643. CONTINUATION OF COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE OPER-
ATIONS AT BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION, MAINE. 
(a) CONTINUATION OF OPERATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall provide for the continuation of commissary and exchange 
operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine, until the later 
of the following: 
(1) The closure of Brunswick Naval Air Station. 
(2) The end of the 60-day period beginning on the date 
on which the Secretary of Defense makes the determination 
under subsection (b). 
(b) REVIEW AND DETERMINATION.—Not earlier than 120 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall— 
(1) review any report prepared by the Comptroller General 
of the United States relating to commissary and exchange 
operations at Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine; and 
(2) based on such review, make a determination regarding 
whether such operations should be continued. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 651. REPORT ON BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FOR PER-
SONNEL ASSIGNED TO SEA DUTY. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than July 1, 2011, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense commit-
tees a report containing the following: 
(1) A review of the standards used to determine the 
monthly rates of basic allowance for housing for personnel 
assigned to sea duty (under section 403 of title 37, United 
States Code). 
(2) A review of the legislative framework and policies 
applicable to eligibility and levels of compensation for single 
and married personnel, with and without dependents, who are 
assigned to sea duty. 
(3) Any recommendation for modifications of title 37, 
United States Code, relating to basic allowance for housing 
for personnel who are assigned to sea duty that the Secretary 
considers appropriate, including an estimate of the cost of each 
modification. 
(b) ELEMENTS OF REVIEWS.—In conducting the reviews for pur-
poses of subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider whether existing 
Deadline. 
Time period. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00788
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4243 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
law, policies, and housing standards are suitable in terms of the 
following: 
(1) The cost and availability of housing ashore for personnel 
assigned to sea duty. 
(2) The pay and allowances (other than basic allowance 
for housing) payable to personnel who are assigned to sea 
duty, including basic pay, career sea pay, and the family separa-
tion allowance. 
(3) The comparability in levels of compensation for single 
and married personnel, with and without dependents, who are 
assigned to sea duty. 
(4) The provision of appropriate quality of life and retention 
incentives for members in all grades who are assigned to sea 
duty. 
(5) The provision of appropriate recognition and motivation 
for promotion to higher military grades of personnel who are 
assigned to sea duty. 
(6) Budgetary constraints and rising personnel costs. 
SEC. 652. REPORT ON SAVINGS FROM ENHANCED MANAGEMENT OF 
SPECIAL 
PAY 
FOR 
AVIATION 
CAREER 
OFFICERS 
EXTENDING PERIOD OF ACTIVE DUTY. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than August 1, 2011, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report regarding the use and management of the 
special pay programs authorized in section 301b of title 37, United 
States Code, for aviation career officers extending a period of active 
duty. 
(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 
(a) shall include the following: 
(1) A review of the programs operated by the Secretaries 
of the military departments, including— 
(A) directives and guidelines issued by the Secretary 
of Defense; 
(B) the number of aviation officers receiving the special 
pay, listed by weapon system; 
(C) the weapon systems for which special pay is not 
authorized and the number of aviation officers affected 
by such exclusion; 
(D) the policy and structure of the programs and the 
retention philosophy supporting the policy and structure 
of the programs; 
(E) the amounts paid to individual aviation officers, 
annually and over the course of a career; and 
(F) the amounts budgeted annually for such programs. 
(2) An accounting of aviation officers receiving the special 
pay who have an active duty service commitment and the 
totals of aviation officers and allocated funding by types of 
active duty service commitment. 
(3) A review of retention trends for aviation officers, gen-
erally and by weapon system, within the military departments 
and an assessment of the factors that influence retention 
trends, and the reliability and durability of those trends if 
such factors are altered. 
(4) An assessment of the funds that can be saved by restruc-
turing or eliminating such programs to reduce payments to 
aviation officers associated with those weapon systems with 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00789
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4244 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
strong retention trends and aviation officers with active duty 
service commitments. 
(5) A review of the demand for former military aviation 
officers to fulfill commercial airline hiring requirements, recent 
data regarding airline hiring of former military aviation officers, 
and an assessment of the methods used by airlines to qualify 
pilot candidates for employment as commercial pilots. 
(6) Any recommendations for modifications of title 37, 
United States Code, relating to special pay for aviation career 
officers extending a period of active duty. 
TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits 
Sec. 701. Extension of prohibition on increases in certain health care costs. 
Sec. 702. Extension of dependent coverage under the TRICARE program. 
Sec. 703. Survivor dental benefits. 
Sec. 704. Aural screenings for members of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 705. Temporary prohibition on increase in copayments under retail pharmacy 
system of pharmacy benefits program. 
Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 
Sec. 711. Administration of TRICARE. 
Sec. 712. Postdeployment health reassessments for purposes of the medical track-
ing system for members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas. 
Sec. 713. Clarification of licensure requirements applicable to military health-care 
professionals who are members of the National Guard performing cer-
tain duty while in State status. 
Sec. 714. Improvements to oversight of medical training for Medical Corps officers. 
Sec. 715. Health information technology. 
Sec. 716. Education and training on use of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation pro-
grams for wounded warriors. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
Sec. 721. Repeal of report requirement on separations resulting from refusal to par-
ticipate in anthrax vaccine immunization program. 
Sec. 722. Comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assessments of 
members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. 
Sec. 723. Assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder by military occupation. 
Sec. 724. Licensed mental health counselors and the TRICARE program. 
Subtitle A—Improvements to Health 
Benefits 
SEC. 701. EXTENSION OF PROHIBITION ON INCREASES IN CERTAIN 
HEALTH CARE COSTS. 
(a) CHARGES UNDER CONTRACTS FOR MEDICAL CARE.—Section 
1097(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 
‘‘September 30, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2011’’. 
(b) CHARGES FOR INPATIENT CARE.—Section 1086(b)(3) of such 
title is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘September 30, 2011’’. 
SEC. 702. EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT COVERAGE UNDER THE TRICARE 
PROGRAM. 
(a) DEPENDENT COVERAGE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00790
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4245 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘§ 1110b. TRICARE program: extension of dependent cov-
erage 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with subsection (c), an indi-
vidual described in subsection (b) shall be deemed to be a dependent 
(as described in section 1072(2)(D) of this title) for purposes of 
coverage under the TRICARE program. 
‘‘(b) INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED.—An individual described in this 
subsection is an individual who— 
‘‘(1) would be a dependent under section 1072(2) of this 
title but for exceeding an age limit under such section; 
‘‘(2) has not attained the age of 26; 
‘‘(3) is not eligible to enroll in an eligible employer-spon-
sored plan (as defined in section 5000A(f)(2) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986); 
‘‘(4) is not otherwise a dependent of a member or a former 
member under any subparagraph of section 1072(2) of this 
title; and 
‘‘(5) meets other criteria specified in regulations prescribed 
by the Secretary, similar to regulations prescribed by the Sec-
retary of Health and Human Services under section 2714(b) 
of the Public Health Service Act. 
‘‘(c) PREMIUM.—(1) The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation 
a premium (or premiums) for coverage under the TRICARE program 
provided pursuant to this section to an individual described in 
subsection (b). 
‘‘(2) The monthly amount of the premium in effect for a month 
for coverage under the TRICARE program pursuant to this section 
shall be the amount equal to the cost of such coverage that the 
Secretary determines on an appropriate actuarial basis. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary shall prescribe the requirements and proce-
dures applicable to the payment of premiums under this subsection. 
‘‘(4) Amounts collected as premiums under this subsection shall 
be credited to the appropriation available for the Defense Health 
Program Account under section 1100 of this title, shall be merged 
with sums in such Account that are available for the fiscal year 
in which collected, and shall be available under subsection (b) 
of such section for such fiscal year.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
item relating to section 1110a the following new item: 
‘‘1110b. TRICARE program: extension of dependent coverage.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE
AND REGULATIONS.—The amendments 
made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2011. The 
Secretary of Defense shall prescribe an interim final rule with 
respect to such amendments, effective not later than January 1, 
2011. 
SEC. 703. SURVIVOR DENTAL BENEFITS. 
Paragraph (2) of section 1076a(k) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(2) Such term includes any such dependent of a member who 
dies— 
‘‘(A) while on active duty for a period of more than 30 
days; or 
‘‘(B) while such member is a member of the Ready 
Reserve.’’. 
10 USC 1110b 
note. 
Deadline. 
Requirements. 
Procedures. 
Determination. 
Regulations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00791
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4246 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 704. AURAL SCREENINGS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 
(a) TINNITUS SCREENING.— 
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—Not later than September 30, 2011, 
the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to identify 
the best tests currently available to screen members of the 
Armed Forces for tinnitus. 
(2) PLAN.—Not later than December 31, 2011, the Secretary 
shall develop a plan to ensure that all members of the Armed 
Forces are screened for tinnitus prior to and after a deployment 
to a combat zone. 
(3) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2011, the Sec-
retary shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report containing the results of the study under paragraph 
(1) and the plan under paragraph (2). 
(b) IMPROVING AURAL PROTECTION FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with section 721 of the 
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4506), the Secretary 
of Defense shall examine methods to improve the aural protec-
tion for members of the Armed Forces in combat. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the methods to 
improve aural protection examined under subsection (a). 
(c) CENTER OF EXCELLENCE.—The Secretary shall ensure that 
all studies, findings, plans, and reports conducted or submitted 
under this section are transmitted to the center of excellence estab-
lished by section 721 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4506). 
SEC. 705. TEMPORARY PROHIBITION ON INCREASE IN COPAYMENTS 
UNDER RETAIL PHARMACY SYSTEM OF PHARMACY BENE-
FITS PROGRAM. 
During the period beginning on October 1, 2010, and ending 
on September 30, 2011, the cost sharing requirements established 
under paragraph (6) of section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States 
Code, for pharmaceutical agents available through retail phar-
macies covered by paragraph (2)(E)(ii) of such section may not 
exceed amounts as follows: 
(1) In the case of generic agents, $3. 
(2) In the case of formulary agents, $9. 
(3) In the case of nonformulary agents, $22. 
Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 
SEC. 711. ADMINISTRATION OF TRICARE. 
Subsection (a) of section 1073 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Except’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Except’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the Secretary 
of Defense shall have responsibility for administering the TRICARE 
program and making any decision affecting such program.’’. 
Time period. 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00792
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4247 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 712. POSTDEPLOYMENT HEALTH REASSESSMENTS FOR PUR-
POSES OF THE MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEM FOR MEM-
BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DEPLOYED OVERSEAS. 
(a) REQUIREMENT
FOR POSTDEPLOYMENT HEALTH REASSESS-
MENTS.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of section 1074f of title 
10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(1)(A) The system described in subsection (a) shall include 
the use of predeployment medical examinations and postdeployment 
medical examinations (including the assessment of mental health 
and the drawing of blood samples) and postdeployment health 
reassessments to— 
‘‘(i) accurately record the health status of members before 
their deployment; 
‘‘(ii) accurately record any changes in their health status 
during the course of their deployment; and 
‘‘(iii) identify health concerns, including mental health con-
cerns, that may become manifest several months following their 
deployment. 
‘‘(B) The postdeployment medical examination shall be con-
ducted when the member is redeployed or otherwise leaves an 
area in which the system is in operation (or as soon as possible 
thereafter). 
‘‘(C) The postdeployment health reassessment shall be con-
ducted at an appropriate time during the period beginning 90 
days after the member is redeployed and ending 180 days after 
the member is redeployed.’’. 
(b) INCORPORATION
IN
REASSESSMENTS
OF
ELEMENTS
OF 
PREDEPLOYMENT AND POSTDEPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS.— 
Paragraph (2) of such subsection is amended by striking ‘‘and 
postdeployment medical examination’’ and inserting ‘‘medical exam-
ination, postdeployment medical examination, and postdeployment 
health reassessment’’. 
(c) 
RECORDKEEPING.—Subsection 
(c) 
of 
such 
section 
is 
amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘and reassessments’’ after ‘‘medical 
examinations’’; and 
(2) by inserting ‘‘and the prescription and administration 
of psychotropic medications’’ after ‘‘including immunizations’’. 
(d) QUALITY ASSURANCE.—Subsection (d) of such section is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and postdeployment med-
ical examinations’’ and inserting ‘‘, postdeployment medical 
examinations, and postdeployment health reassessments’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘and reassess-
ments’’ after ‘‘postdeployment health assessments’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and reassess-
ments’’ after ‘‘such assessments’’. 
SEC. 
713. 
CLARIFICATION 
OF 
LICENSURE 
REQUIREMENTS 
APPLICABLE TO MILITARY HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS 
WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD PER-
FORMING CERTAIN DUTY WHILE IN STATE STATUS. 
Section 1094(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or (3)’’ after ‘‘paragraph 
(2)’’; 
Time period. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00793
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4248 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘as being described in 
this paragraph’’ after ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) A health-care professional referred to in paragraph (1) 
as being described in this paragraph is a member of the National 
Guard who— 
‘‘(A) has a current license to practice medicine, osteopathic 
medicine, dentistry, or another health profession; and 
‘‘(B) is performing training or duty under section 502(f) 
of title 32 in response to an actual or potential disaster.’’. 
SEC. 714. IMPROVEMENTS TO OVERSIGHT OF MEDICAL TRAINING FOR 
MEDICAL CORPS OFFICERS. 
(a) REVIEW OF TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL OFFICERS.— 
(1) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 
review of training programs for medical officers (as defined 
in section 101(b)(14) of title 10, United States Code) to ensure 
that the academic and military performance of such officers 
has been completely documented in military personnel records. 
The programs reviewed shall include, at a minimum, the fol-
lowing: 
(A) Programs at the Uniformed Services University 
of the Health Sciences that award a medical doctor degree. 
(B) Selected residency programs at military medical 
treatment facilities, as determined by the Secretary, to 
include at least one program in each of the specialties 
of— 
(i) anesthesiology; 
(ii) emergency medicine; 
(iii) family medicine; 
(iv) general surgery; 
(v) neurology; 
(vi) obstetrics/gynecology; 
(vii) pathology; 
(viii) pediatrics; and 
(ix) psychiatry. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings 
of the review under paragraph (1). 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT ON GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PRO-
GRAMS.— 
(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2011, and 
annually thereafter through 2015, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
on the status of the graduate medical education programs of 
the Department of Defense. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall 
include the following: 
(A) An identification of each graduate medical edu-
cation program of the Department of Defense in effect 
during the previous fiscal year, including for each such 
program, the military department responsible, the location, 
the medical specialty, the period of training required, and 
the number of students by year. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00794
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4249 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) The status of each program referred to in subpara-
graph (A), including, for each such program, an identifica-
tion of the fiscal year in which the last action was taken 
with respect to each of the following: 
(i) Initial accreditation. 
(ii) Continued accreditation. 
(iii) If applicable, probation, and the reasons for 
probationary status. 
(iv) If applicable, withheld or withdrawn accredita-
tion, and the reasons for such action. 
(C) A discussion of trends in the graduate medical 
education programs of the Department. 
(D) A discussion of challenges faced by such programs, 
and a description and assessment of strategies and plans 
to address such challenges. 
(E) Such other matters as the Secretary considers 
appropriate. 
SEC. 715. HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. 
(a) ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY STUDY.— 
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall con-
duct an enterprise risk assessment methodology study of all 
health information technology programs of the Department of 
Defense. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report containing the 
results of the study required under paragraph (1). 
(b) REPORT ON HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZA-
TIONAL STRUCTURE AND FUTURE PLANS.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
on the organizational structure for health information tech-
nology within the Department of Defense. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 
shall include the following: 
(A) Organizational charts for all organizations involved 
with health information technology showing, at a minimum, 
the senior positions in each office and each activity. 
(B) A description of the functions and responsibilities, 
to include policy formulation, policy and program execution, 
and program oversight, of each senior position for health 
information technology. 
(C) An assessment of how well the health information 
systems of the Department of Defense interact with the 
health information systems of— 
(i) the Department of Veterans Affairs; and 
(ii) entities other than the Federal Government. 
(D) A description of the role played by the Interagency 
Program Office established by section 1635 of the Wounded 
Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 
1071 note) and whether the office is satisfactorily per-
forming the functions required by such section, as well 
as recommendations for administrative or legislative action 
as the Secretary considers appropriate. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00795
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4250 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(E) A complete description of all future plans for legacy 
systems and new electronic health record initiatives, 
including the joint virtual lifetime electronic record. 
(F) The results of the survey described in paragraph 
(3). 
(3) SURVEY.—The Secretary shall conduct a survey of users 
of the health information technology systems of the Department 
of Defense to assess the benefits and failings of such systems. 
(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
(A) The term ‘‘senior position’’ means a position filled 
by a member of the senior executive service, a position 
on the Executive Schedule established pursuant to title 
5, United States Code, or a position filled by a general 
or flag officer. 
(B) The term ‘‘senior personnel’’ means personnel who 
are members of the senior executive service, who fill a 
position listed on the Executive Schedule established pursu-
ant to title 5, United States Code, or who are general 
or flag officers. 
(c) REPORT ON GAO REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 
31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the report by the Comptroller Gen-
eral of the United States titled ‘‘Information Technology: Opportuni-
ties Exist to Improve Management of DOD’s Electronic Health 
Record Initiative’’ (GAO-11-50), including— 
(1) the status of implementing the recommendations made 
in such report; and 
(2) for each such recommendation that has not been imple-
mented, the reason why the recommendation has not been 
implemented. 
SEC. 716. EDUCATION AND TRAINING ON USE OF PHARMACEUTICALS 
IN REHABILITATION PROGRAMS FOR WOUNDED WAR-
RIORS. 
(a) EDUCATION
AND TRAINING REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall develop and implement training, available through 
the Internet or other means, on the use of pharmaceuticals in 
rehabilitation programs for seriously ill or injured members of the 
Armed Forces. 
(b) RECIPIENTS
OF TRAINING.—The training developed and 
implemented under subsection (a) shall be training for each category 
of individuals as follows: 
(1) Patients in or transitioning to a wounded warrior unit, 
with special accommodation in such training for such patients 
with cognitive disabilities. 
(2) Nonmedical case managers. 
(3) Military leaders. 
(4) Family members. 
(c) ELEMENTS OF TRAINING.—The training developed and imple-
mented under subsection (a) shall include the following: 
(1) An overview of the fundamentals of safe prescription 
drug use. 
(2) Familiarization with the benefits and risks of using 
pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation therapies. 
(3) Examples of the use of pharmaceuticals for individuals 
with multiple, complex injuries, including traumatic brain 
injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. 
10 USC 1074g 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00796
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4251 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) Familiarization with means of finding additional 
resources for information on pharmaceuticals. 
(5) Familiarization with basic elements of pain and 
pharmaceutical management. 
(6) Familiarization with complementary and alternative 
therapies. 
(d) TAILORING OF TRAINING.—The training developed and imple-
mented under subsection (a) shall appropriately tailor the elements 
specified in subsection (c) for and among each category of individuals 
set forth in subsection (b). 
(e) REVIEW OF PHARMACY.— 
(1) REVIEW.—The Secretary shall review all policies and 
procedures of the Department of Defense regarding the use 
of pharmaceuticals in rehabilitation programs for seriously ill 
or injured members of the Armed Forces. 
(2) RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than September 20, 
2011, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees any recommendations for administrative or legisla-
tive action with respect to the review under paragraph (1) 
as the Secretary considers appropriate. 
Subtitle C—Other Matters 
SEC. 721. REPEAL OF REPORT REQUIREMENT ON SEPARATIONS 
RESULTING FROM REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN ANTHRAX 
VACCINE IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM. 
Section 1178 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT TO ESTABLISH SYSTEM.— 
’’; and 
(2) by striking subsection (b). 
SEC. 722. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON CONSISTENT NEUROLOGICAL 
COGNITIVE ASSESSMENTS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES BEFORE AND AFTER DEPLOYMENT. 
(a) COMPREHENSIVE POLICY REQUIRED.—Not later than January 
31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement 
a comprehensive policy on consistent neurological cognitive assess-
ments of members of the Armed Forces before and after deployment. 
(b) UPDATES.—The Secretary shall revise the policy required 
by subsection (a) on a periodic basis in accordance with experience 
and evolving best practice guidelines. 
SEC. 723. ASSESSMENT OF POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER BY 
MILITARY OCCUPATION. 
(a) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretaries of the military departments 
shall each conduct an assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder 
incidence by military occupation, including identification of military 
occupations with a high incidence of such disorder. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall each submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the assessment under 
subsection (a). 
(c) CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
ensure that all studies, findings, plans, and reports conducted or 
submitted under this section are transmitted to the centers of 
excellence established by sections 1621 and 1622 of the Wounded 
Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181). 
Deadline. 
10 USC 1074f 
note. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00797
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4252 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 724. LICENSED MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELORS AND THE TRICARE 
PROGRAM. 
Not later than June 20, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall 
prescribe the regulations required by section 717 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 
181; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note). 
TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, AC-
QUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RE-
LATED MATTERS 
Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 
Sec. 801. Disclosure to litigation support contractors. 
Sec. 802. Designation of engine development and procurement program as major 
subprogram. 
Sec. 803. Enhancement of Department of Defense authority to respond to combat 
and safety emergencies through rapid acquisition and deployment of ur-
gently needed supplies. 
Sec. 804. Review of acquisition process for rapid fielding of capabilities in response 
to urgent operational needs. 
Sec. 805. Acquisition of major automated information system programs. 
Sec. 806. Requirements for information relating to supply chain risk. 
Subtitle B—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 
Sec. 811. Cost estimates for program baselines and contract negotiations for major 
defense acquisition and major automated information system programs. 
Sec. 812. Management of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisition pro-
grams. 
Sec. 813. Modification and extension of requirements of the Weapon System Acqui-
sition Reform Act of 2009. 
Sec. 814. Inclusion of major subprograms to major defense acquisition programs 
under various acquisition-related requirements. 
Subtitle C—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 
Limitations 
Sec. 821. Provisions relating to fire resistant fiber for production of military uni-
forms. 
Sec. 822. Repeal of requirement for certain procurements from firms in the small 
arms production industrial base. 
Sec. 823. Review of regulatory definition relating to production of specialty metals. 
Sec. 824. Guidance relating to rights in technical data. 
Sec. 825. Extension of sunset date for certain protests of task and delivery order 
contracts. 
Sec. 826. Inclusion of option amounts in limitations on authority of the Department 
of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects. 
Sec. 827. Permanent authority for Defense Acquisition Challenge Program; pilot ex-
pansion of Program. 
Sec. 828. Energy savings performance contracts. 
Sec. 829. Definition of materials critical to national security. 
Subtitle D—Contractor Matters 
Sec. 831. Oversight and accountability of contractors performing private security 
functions in areas of combat operations. 
Sec. 832. Extension of regulations on contractors performing private security func-
tions to areas of other significant military operations. 
Sec. 833. Standards and certification for private security contractors. 
Sec. 834. Enhancements of authority of Secretary of Defense to reduce or deny 
award fees to companies found to jeopardize the health or safety of Gov-
ernment personnel. 
Sec. 835. Annual joint report and Comptroller General review on contracting in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 841. Improvements to structure and functioning of Joint Requirements Over-
sight Council. 
Deadline. 
Regulations. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00798
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4253 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 842. Department of Defense policy on acquisition and performance of sustain-
able products and services. 
Sec. 843. Assessment and plan for critical rare earth materials in defense applica-
tions. 
Sec. 844. Review of national security exception to competition. 
Sec. 845. Requirement for entities with facility clearances that are not under for-
eign ownership control or influence mitigation. 
Sec. 846. Procurement of photovoltaic devices. 
Sec. 847. Non-availability exception from Buy American requirements for procure-
ment of hand or measuring tools. 
Sec. 848. Contractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
Subtitle F—Improve Acquisition Act 
Sec. 860. Short title. 
PART I—DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM 
Sec. 861. Improvements to the management of the defense acquisition system. 
Sec. 862. Comptroller General report on Joint Capabilities Integration and Devel-
opment System. 
Sec. 863. Requirements for the acquisition of services. 
Sec. 864. Review of defense acquisition guidance. 
Sec. 865. Requirement to review references to services acquisition throughout the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement. 
Sec. 866.
Pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental 
items. 
PART II—DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE 
Sec. 871. Acquisition workforce excellence. 
Sec. 872. Amendments to the acquisition workforce demonstration project. 
Sec. 873. Career development for civilian and military personnel in the acquisition 
workforce. 
Sec. 874. Recertification and training requirements. 
Sec. 875. Information technology acquisition workforce. 
Sec. 876. Definition of acquisition workforce. 
Sec. 877. Defense Acquisition University curriculum review. 
PART III—FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 
Sec. 881. Audit readiness of financial statements of the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 882. Review of obligation and expenditure thresholds. 
Sec. 883. Disclosure and traceability of the cost of Department of Defense health 
care contracts. 
PART IV—INDUSTRIAL BASE 
Sec. 891. Expansion of the industrial base. 
Sec. 892. Price trend analysis for supplies and equipment purchased by the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
Sec. 893. Contractor business systems. 
Sec. 894. Review and recommendations on eliminating barriers to contracting with 
the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 895. Inclusion of the providers of services and information technology in the 
national technology and industrial base. 
Sec. 896. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial 
Base Policy; Industrial Base Fund. 
Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and 
Management 
SEC. 801. DISCLOSURE TO LITIGATION SUPPORT CONTRACTORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2320 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘subsection (a), allowing’’ and inserting 
‘‘subsection (a)— 
‘‘(A) allowing’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00799
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4254 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(B) allowing a covered litigation support contractor 
access to and use of any technical, proprietary, or confiden-
tial data delivered under a contract for the sole purpose 
of providing litigation support to the Government in the 
form of administrative, technical, or professional services 
during or in anticipation of litigation; or’’; and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following: 
‘‘(g) In this section, the term ‘covered litigation support con-
tractor’ means a contractor (including an expert or technical consult-
ant) under contract with the Department of Defense to provide 
litigation support, which contractor executes a contract with the 
Government agreeing to and acknowledging— 
‘‘(1) that proprietary or nonpublic technical data furnished 
will be accessed and used only for the purposes stated in 
that contract; 
‘‘(2) that the covered litigation support contractor will take 
all reasonable steps to protect the proprietary and nonpublic 
nature of the technical data furnished to the covered litigation 
support contractor; and 
‘‘(3) that such technical data provided to the covered litiga-
tion support contractor under the authority of this section shall 
not be used by the covered litigation support contractor to 
compete against the third party for Government or non-Govern-
ment contracts.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall take effect on the date that is 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 802. DESIGNATION OF ENGINE DEVELOPMENT AND PROCURE-
MENT PROGRAM AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAM. 
(a) DESIGNATION AS MAJOR SUBPROGRAM.—Not later than 30 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall designate an engine development and procurement 
program as a major subprogram of the F–35 Lightning II aircraft 
major defense acquisition program, in accordance with section 2430a 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(b) ORIGINAL BASELINE.—For purposes of reporting require-
ments referred to in section 2430a(b) of title 10, United States 
Code, for the major subprogram designated under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use the Milestone B decision as the original 
baseline for the subprogram. 
(c) ACTIONS FOLLOWING CRITICAL COST GROWTH.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), to the extent 
that the Secretary elects to restructure the Lightning II aircraft 
major defense acquisition program subsequent to a reassess-
ment and actions required by subsections (a) and (c) of section 
2433a of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2010, 
and also conducts such reassessment and actions with respect 
to an F–35 engine development and procurement program 
(including related reporting based on the original baseline as 
defined in subsection (c)), the requirements of section 2433a 
of such title with respect to a major subprogram designated 
under subsection (a) shall be considered to be met with respect 
to the major subprogram. 
(2) LIMITATION.—Actions taken in accordance with para-
graph (1) shall be considered to meet the requirements of 
section 2433a of title 10, United States Code, with respect 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2320 
note. 
Definition. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00800
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4255 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to a major subprogram designated under subsection (a) only 
to the extent that designation as a major subprogram would 
require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a reassessment 
and take actions pursuant to such section 2433a for such a 
subprogram upon enactment of this Act. The requirements 
of such section 2433a shall not be considered to be met with 
respect to such a subprogram in the event that additional 
programmatic changes, following the date of the enactment 
of this Act, cause the program acquisition unit cost or procure-
ment unit cost of such a subprogram to increase by a percentage 
equal to or greater than the critical cost growth threshold 
(as defined in section 2433(a)(5) of such title) for the subpro-
gram. 
SEC. 803. ENHANCEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY 
TO RESPOND TO COMBAT AND SAFETY EMERGENCIES 
THROUGH RAPID ACQUISITION AND DEPLOYMENT OF 
URGENTLY NEEDED SUPPLIES. 
(a) REQUIREMENT TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES.—Subsection (a) 
of section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
‘‘items’’ and inserting ‘‘supplies’’; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following 
new paragraph (1): 
‘‘(1)(A) currently under development by the Department 
of Defense or available from the commercial sector; or 
‘‘(B) require only minor modifications to supplies described 
in subparagraph (A); and’’. 
(b) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—Subsection (b) of such section 
is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘items’’ and inserting 
‘‘supplies’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
striking ‘‘items’’ and inserting ‘‘supplies’’; 
(B) in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by striking ‘‘an item’’ 
and inserting ‘‘the supplies’’; and 
(C) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘and utilization’’ 
after ‘‘deployment’’. 
(c) RESPONSE TO COMBAT EMERGENCIES.—Subsection (c) of such 
section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘equipment’’ each place it appears other 
than paragraph (5) and inserting ‘‘supplies’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘combat capability’’ each place it appears; 
(3) by striking ‘‘that has resulted in combat fatalities’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘that has resulted in combat 
casualties, or is likely to result in combat casualties’’; 
(4) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘is’’ and inserting ‘‘are’’; 
(5) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘is’’ each place 
it appears and inserting ‘‘are’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘fatalities’’ at the 
end and inserting ‘‘casualties’’; 
(6) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows: 
‘‘(3) In any fiscal year in which the Secretary makes a deter-
mination described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may use any 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00801
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4256 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
funds available to the Department of Defense for that fiscal year 
for acquisitions of supplies under this section if the determination 
includes a written finding that the use of such funds is necessary 
to address the combat capability deficiency in a timely manner. 
The authority of this section may not be used to acquire supplies 
in an amount aggregating more than $200,000,000 during any 
such fiscal year.’’; 
(7) in paragraph (4)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘, in consultation with the Director 
of the Office of Management and Budget,’’ after ‘‘shall’’; 
and 
(B) by striking ‘‘Each such notice’’ and inserting ‘‘For 
each such determination, the notice under the preceding 
sentence’’; and 
(8) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘that equipment’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the supplies concerned’’. 
(d) WAIVER
OF CERTAIN STATUES
AND REGULATIONS.—Sub-
section (d)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘equipment’’ 
in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) and inserting ‘‘supplies’’. 
(e) TESTING REQUIREMENT.—Subsection (e) of such section is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
striking ‘‘an item’’ and inserting ‘‘the supplies’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘of the item’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘requirements document’’ and 
inserting ‘‘of the supplies in meeting the original require-
ments for the supplies (as stated in a statement of the 
urgent operational need’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘an item’’ and inserting ‘‘supplies’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘the item’’ and inserting ‘‘the supplies’’; 
and 
(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘items’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘supplies’’. 
(f) LIMITATION.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘(f) LIMITATION.—In the case of supplies that are part of a 
major system for which a low-rate initial production quantity deter-
mination has been made pursuant to section 2400 of title 10, 
United States Code, the quantity of such supplies acquired using 
the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section may not exceed 
an amount consistent with complying with limitations on the 
quantity of articles approved for low-rate initial production for 
such system. Any such supplies shall be included in any relevant 
calculation of quantities for low-rate initial production for the 
system concerned.’’. 
SEC. 804. REVIEW OF ACQUISITION PROCESS FOR RAPID FIELDING 
OF CAPABILITIES IN RESPONSE TO URGENT OPERATIONAL 
NEEDS. 
(a) REVIEW OF RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
complete a review of the process for the fielding of capabilities 
in response to urgent operational needs and submit a report 
on the review to the congressional defense committees. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
10 USC 806. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00802
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4257 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) REVIEW
AND
REPORT
REQUIREMENTS.—The review 
pursuant to this section shall include consideration of various 
improvements to the acquisition process for rapid fielding of 
capabilities in response to urgent operational needs. For each 
improvement, the report on the review shall discuss— 
(A) the Department’s review of the improvement; 
(B) if the improvement is being implemented by the 
Department, a schedule for implementing the improvement; 
and 
(C) if the improvement is not being implemented by 
the Department, an explanation of why the improvement 
is not being implemented. 
(3) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED.—The improvements 
that shall be considered during the review are the following: 
(A) Providing a streamlined, expedited, and tightly 
integrated iterative approach to— 
(i) the identification and validation of urgent oper-
ational needs; 
(ii) the analysis of alternatives and identification 
of preferred solutions; 
(iii) the development and approval of appropriate 
requirements and acquisition documents; 
(iv) the identification and minimization of develop-
ment, integration, and manufacturing risks; 
(v) the consideration of operation and sustainment 
costs; 
(vi) the allocation of appropriate funding; and 
(vii) the rapid production and delivery of required 
capabilities. 
(B) Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of 
the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs 
of Staff, the military departments, and other components 
of the Department of Defense for carrying out all phases 
of the process. 
(C) Designating a senior official within the Office of 
the Secretary of Defense with primary responsibility for 
making recommendations to the Secretary on the use of 
the authority provided by subsections (c) and (d) of section 
806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2003 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note), as amended 
by section 803 of this Act, in appropriate circumstances. 
(D) Establishing a target date for the fielding of a 
capability pursuant to each validated urgent operational 
need. 
(E) Implementing a system for— 
(i) documenting key process milestones, such as 
funding, acquisition, fielding, and assessment decisions 
and actions; and 
(ii) tracking the cost, schedule, and performance 
of acquisitions conducted pursuant to the process. 
(F) Establishing a formal feedback mechanism for the 
commanders of the combatant commands to provide 
information to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and senior acquisi-
tion officials on how well fielded solutions are meeting 
urgent operational needs. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00803
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4258 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(G) Establishing a dedicated source of funding for the 
rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent oper-
ational needs. 
(H) Issuing guidance to provide for the appropriate 
transition of capabilities acquired through rapid fielding 
into the traditional budget, requirements, and acquisition 
process for purposes of contracts for follow-on production, 
sustainment, and logistics support. 
(I) Such other improvements as the Secretary considers 
appropriate. 
(b) DISCRIMINATING URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FROM TRADI-
TIONAL REQUIREMENTS.— 
(1) EXPEDITED REVIEW PROCESS.—Not later than 270 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall develop and implement an expedited review process to 
determine whether capabilities proposed as urgent operational 
needs are appropriate for fielding through the process for the 
rapid fielding of capabilities or should be fielded through the 
traditional acquisition process. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The review process developed and imple-
mented pursuant to paragraph (1) shall— 
(A) apply to the rapid fielding of capabilities in 
response to joint urgent operational need statements and 
to other urgent operational needs statements generated 
by the military departments and the combatant commands; 
(B) identify officials responsible for making determina-
tions described in paragraph (1); 
(C) establish appropriate time periods for making such 
determinations; 
(D) set forth standards and criteria for making such 
determinations based on considerations of urgency, risk, 
and life-cycle management; 
(E) establish appropriate thresholds for the applica-
bility of the review process, or of elements of the review 
process; and 
(F) authorize appropriate officials to make exceptions 
from standards and criteria established under subpara-
graph (D) in exceptional circumstances. 
(3) COVERED CAPABILITIES.—The review process developed 
and implemented pursuant to paragraph (1) shall provide that, 
subject to such exceptions as the Secretary considers appro-
priate for purposes of this section, the acquisition process for 
rapid fielding of capabilities in response to urgent operational 
needs is appropriate only for capabilities that— 
(A) can be fielded within a period of two to 24 months; 
(B) do not require substantial development effort; 
(C) are based on technologies that are proven and 
available; and 
(D) can appropriately be acquired under fixed price 
contracts. 
(4) INCLUSION IN REPORT.—The Secretary shall include a 
description of the expedited review process implemented pursu-
ant to paragraph (1) in the report required by subsection (a). 
Applicability. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00804
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4259 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 805. ACQUISITION OF MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM 
PROGRAMS. 
(a) PROGRAM TO IMPROVE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROC-
ESSES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 131 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2223 the following 
new section: 
‘‘§ 2223a. Information technology acquisition planning and 
oversight requirements 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall establish a program to improve the planning and oversight 
processes for the acquisition of major automated information sys-
tems by the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(b) PROGRAM COMPONENTS.—The program established under 
subsection (a) shall include— 
‘‘(1) a documented process for information technology 
acquisition planning, requirements development and manage-
ment, project management and oversight, earned value manage-
ment, and risk management; 
‘‘(2) the development of appropriate metrics that can be 
implemented and monitored on a real-time basis for perform-
ance measurement of— 
‘‘(A) processes and development status of investments 
in major automated information system programs; 
‘‘(B) continuous process improvement of such programs; 
and 
‘‘(C) achievement of program and investment outcomes; 
‘‘(3) a process to ensure that key program personnel have 
an appropriate level of experience, training, and education in 
the planning, acquisition, execution, management, and over-
sight of information technology systems; 
‘‘(4) a process to ensure sufficient resources and infrastruc-
ture capacity for test and evaluation of information technology 
systems; 
‘‘(5) a process to ensure that military departments and 
Defense Agencies adhere to established processes and require-
ments relating to the planning, acquisition, execution, manage-
ment, and oversight of information technology programs and 
developments; and 
‘‘(6) a process under which an appropriate Department 
of Defense official may intervene or terminate the funding 
of an information technology investment if the investment is 
at risk of not achieving major project milestones.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 2223 the following new item: 
‘‘2223a. Information technology acquisition planning and oversight requirements.’’. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Section 2445b(b) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(5) For each major automated information system program 
for which such information has not been provided in a previous 
annual report— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00805
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4260 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(A) a description of the business case analysis (if 
any) that has been prepared for the program and key 
functional requirements for the program; 
‘‘(B) a description of the analysis of alternatives con-
ducted with regard to the program; 
‘‘(C) an assessment of the extent to which the program, 
or portions of the program, have technical requirements 
of sufficient clarity that the program, or portions of the 
program, may be feasibly procured under firm, fixed-price 
contracts; 
‘‘(D) the most recent independent cost estimate or cost 
analysis for the program provided by the Director of Cost 
Assessment and Program Evaluation in accordance with 
section 2334(a)(6) of this title; 
‘‘(E) a certification by a Department of Defense acquisi-
tion official with responsibility for the program that all 
technical and business requirements have been reviewed 
and validated to ensure alignment with the business case; 
and 
‘‘(F) an explanation of the basis for the certification 
described in subparagraph (E). 
‘‘(6) For each major automated information system program 
for which the information required under paragraph (5) has 
been provided in a previous annual report, a summary of any 
significant changes to the information previously provided.’’. 
SEC. 806. REQUIREMENTS FOR INFORMATION RELATING TO SUPPLY 
CHAIN RISK. 
(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the head of a covered 
agency may— 
(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and 
(2) limit, notwithstanding any other provision of law, in 
whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to the 
basis for carrying out a covered procurement action. 
(b) DETERMINATION AND NOTIFICATION.—The head of a covered 
agency may exercise the authority provided in subsection (a) only 
after— 
(1) obtaining a joint recommendation by the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 
and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, 
on the basis of a risk assessment by the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Intelligence, that there is a significant supply 
chain risk to a covered system; 
(2) making a determination in writing, in unclassified or 
classified form, with the concurrence of the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, that— 
(A) use of the authority in subsection (a)(1) is necessary 
to protect national security by reducing supply chain risk; 
(B) less intrusive measures are not reasonably avail-
able to reduce such supply chain risk; and 
(C) in a case where the head of the covered agency 
plans to limit disclosure of information under subsection 
(a)(2), the risk to national security due to the disclosure 
of such information outweighs the risk due to not disclosing 
such information; and 
10 USC 2304 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00806
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4261 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) providing a classified or unclassified notice of the deter-
mination made under paragraph (2) to the appropriate congres-
sional committees, which notice shall include— 
(A) the information required by section 2304(f)(3) of 
title 10, United States Code; 
(B) the joint recommendation by the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and 
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense 
as specified in paragraph (1); 
(C) a summary of the risk assessment by the Under 
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence that serves as the 
basis for the joint recommendation specified in paragraph 
(1); and 
(D) a summary of the basis for the determination, 
including a discussion of less intrusive measures that were 
considered and why they were not reasonably available 
to reduce supply chain risk. 
(c) DELEGATION.—The head of a covered agency may not dele-
gate the authority provided in subsection (a) or the responsibility 
to make a determination under subsection (b) to an official below 
the level of the service acquisition executive for the agency con-
cerned. 
(d) LIMITATION ON DISCLOSURE.—If the head of a covered agency 
has exercised the authority provided in subsection (a)(2) to limit 
disclosure of information— 
(1) no action undertaken by the agency head under such 
authority shall be subject to review in a bid protest before 
the Government Accountability Office or in any Federal court; 
and 
(2) the agency head shall— 
(A) notify appropriate parties of a covered procurement 
action and the basis for such action only to the extent 
necessary to effectuate the covered procurement action; 
(B) notify other Department of Defense components 
or other Federal agencies responsible for procurements that 
may be subject to the same or similar supply chain risk, 
in a manner and to the extent consistent with the require-
ments of national security; and 
(C) ensure the confidentiality of any such notifications. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) HEAD OF A COVERED AGENCY.—The term ‘‘head of a 
covered agency’’ means each of the following: 
(A) The Secretary of Defense. 
(B) The Secretary of the Army. 
(C) The Secretary of the Navy. 
(D) The Secretary of the Air Force. 
(2) COVERED
PROCUREMENT
ACTION.—The term ‘‘covered 
procurement action’’ means any of the following actions, if 
the action takes place in the course of conducting a covered 
procurement: 
(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet quali-
fication standards established in accordance with the 
requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States 
Code, for the purpose of reducing supply chain risk in 
the acquisition of covered systems. 
(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve 
an acceptable rating with regard to an evaluation factor 
Notification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00807
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4262 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in 
the evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract 
or the issuance of a task or delivery order. 
(C) The decision to withhold consent for a contractor 
to subcontract with a particular source or to direct a con-
tractor for a covered system to exclude a particular source 
from consideration for a subcontract under the contract. 
(3) COVERED PROCUREMENT.—The term ‘‘covered procure-
ment’’ means— 
(A) a source selection for a covered system or a covered 
item of supply involving either a performance specification, 
as provided in section 2305(a)(1)(C)(ii) of title 10, United 
States Code, or an evaluation factor, as provided in section 
2305(a)(2)(A) of such title, relating to supply chain risk; 
(B) the consideration of proposals for and issuance 
of a task or delivery order for a covered system or a 
covered item of supply, as provided in section 2304c(d)(3) 
of title 10, United States Code, where the task or delivery 
order contract concerned includes a contract clause estab-
lishing a requirement relating to supply chain risk; or 
(C) any contract action involving a contract for a cov-
ered system or a covered item of supply where such contract 
includes a clause establishing requirements relating to 
supply chain risk. 
(4) SUPPLY
CHAIN
RISK.—The term ‘‘supply chain risk’’ 
means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously 
introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, 
integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, 
operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, 
deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or oper-
ation of such system. 
(5) COVERED SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘covered system’’ means 
a national security system, as that term is defined in section 
3542(b) of title 44, United States Code. 
(6) COVERED ITEM OF SUPPLY.—The term ‘‘covered item 
of supply’’ means an item of information technology (as that 
term is defined in section 11101 of title 40, United States 
Code) that is purchased for inclusion in a covered system, 
and the loss of integrity of which could result in a supply 
chain risk for a covered system. 
(7) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 
‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 
(A) in the case of a covered system included in the 
National Intelligence Program or the Military Intelligence 
Program, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
of the House of Representatives, and the congressional 
defense committees; and 
(B) in the case of a covered system not otherwise 
included in subparagraph (A), the congressional defense 
committees. 
(f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The requirements of this section shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and shall apply to— 
(1) contracts that are awarded on or after such date; and 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00808
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4263 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) task and delivery orders that are issued on or after 
such date pursuant to contracts that awarded before, on, or 
after such date. 
(g) SUNSET.—The authority provided in this section shall expire 
on the date that is three years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
Subtitle B—Provisions Relating to Major 
Defense Acquisition Programs 
SEC. 811. COST ESTIMATES FOR PROGRAM BASELINES AND CONTRACT 
NEGOTIATIONS FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION AND 
MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. 
Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (d)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘para-
graph (3)’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘, the rationale for selecting such 
confidence level, and, if such confidence level is less 
than 80 percent, the justification for selecting a con-
fidence level of less than 80 percent; and’’ and inserting 
‘‘and the rationale for selecting such confidence level;’’; 
(B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 
and 
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) ensure that such confidence level provides a high 
degree of confidence that the program can be completed without 
the need for significant adjustment to program budgets; and’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
(f) and (g), respectively; and 
(3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new sub-
section (e): 
‘‘(e) ESTIMATES FOR PROGRAM BASELINE AND ANALYSES AND 
TARGETS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PURPOSES.—(1) The policies, 
procedures, and guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment 
and Program Evaluation in accordance with the requirements of 
subsection (a) shall provide that— 
‘‘(A) cost estimates developed for baseline descriptions and 
other program purposes conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(6) 
are not to be used for the purpose of contract negotiations 
or the obligation of funds; and 
‘‘(B) cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose 
of contract negotiations and the obligation of funds are based 
on the Government’s reasonable expectation of successful con-
tractor performance in accordance with the contractor’s proposal 
and previous experience. 
‘‘(2) The Program Manager and contracting officer for each 
major defense acquisition program and major automated informa-
tion system program shall ensure that cost analyses and targets 
developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligation 
of funds are carried out in accordance with the requirements of 
paragraph (1) and the policies, procedures, and guidance issued 
by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00809
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4264 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(3) Funds that are made available for a major defense acquisi-
tion program or major automated information system program in 
accordance with a cost estimate conducted pursuant to subsection 
(a)(6), but are excess to a cost analysis or target developed pursuant 
to paragraph (2), shall remain available for obligation in accordance 
with the terms of applicable authorization and appropriations Acts. 
‘‘(4) Funds described in paragraph (3)— 
‘‘(A) may be used— 
‘‘(i) to cover any increased program costs identified 
by a revised cost analysis or target developed pursuant 
to paragraph (2); 
‘‘(ii) to acquire additional end items in accordance with 
the requirements of section 2308 of this title; or 
‘‘(iii) to cover the cost of risk reduction and process 
improvements; and 
‘‘(B) may be reprogrammed, in accordance with established 
procedures, only if determined to be excess to program needs 
on the basis of a cost estimate developed with the concurrence 
of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.’’. 
SEC. 812. MANAGEMENT OF MANUFACTURING RISK IN MAJOR 
DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 
(a) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
issue comprehensive guidance on the management of manufacturing 
risk in major defense acquisition programs. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall, 
at a minimum— 
(1) require the use of manufacturing readiness levels as 
a basis for measuring, assessing, reporting, and communicating 
manufacturing readiness and risk on major defense acquisition 
programs throughout the Department of Defense; 
(2) provide guidance on the definition of manufacturing 
readiness levels and how manufacturing readiness levels should 
be used to assess manufacturing risk and readiness in major 
defense acquisition programs; 
(3) specify manufacturing readiness levels that should be 
achieved at key milestones and decision points for major defense 
acquisition programs; 
(4) identify tools and models that may be used to assess, 
manage, and reduce risks that are identified in the course 
of manufacturing readiness assessments for major defense 
acquisition programs; and 
(5) require appropriate consideration of the manufacturing 
readiness and manufacturing readiness processes of potential 
contractors and subcontractors as a part of the source selection 
process for major defense acquisition programs. 
(c) MANUFACTURING
READINESS
EXPERTISE.—The Secretary 
shall ensure that— 
(1) the acquisition workforce chapter of the annual strategic 
workforce plan required by section 115b of title 10, United 
States Code, includes an assessment of the critical manufac-
turing readiness knowledge and skills needed in the acquisition 
workforce and a plan of action for addressing any gaps in 
such knowledge and skills; and 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2430 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00810
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4265 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) the need of the Department for manufacturing readiness 
knowledge and skills is given appropriate consideration, com-
parable to the consideration given to other program manage-
ment functions, as the Department identifies areas of need 
for funding through the Defense Acquisition Workforce Develop-
ment Fund established in accordance with the requirements 
of section 1705 of title 10, United States Code. 
(d) MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘‘major defense acquisition program’’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 2430(a) of title 10, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 813. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS OF THE 
WEAPON SYSTEM ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2009. 
(a) EXTENSION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 102(b) 
of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public 
Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1714; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘, and not later than 
February 15 of each year from 2011 through 2014’’ after ‘‘Not 
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘The first annual report’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Each annual report from 2010 through 2014’’. 
(b) CLARIFICATION THAT PROTOTYPES MAY BE ACQUIRED FROM 
COMMERCIAL, GOVERNMENT, OR ACADEMIC SOURCES.—Paragraph 
(4) of section 203(a) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 
Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1722; 10 U.S.C. 2430 
note) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(4) That prototypes— 
‘‘(A) may be required under paragraph (1) or (3) for 
the system to be acquired or, if prototyping of the system 
is not feasible, for critical subsystems of the system; and 
‘‘(B) may be acquired from commercial, government, 
or academic sources.’’. 
(c) CLARIFICATION THAT CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED 
FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS FOLLOWING MILE-
STONE C APPROVAL.—Section 204(c)(2) of the Weapon Systems 
Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (123 Stat. 1724) is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting 
a semicolon; 
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(C) has not yet achieved a Milestone C approval.’’. 
(d) CLARIFICATION THAT CERTAIN MILESTONE B CERTIFICATION 
CRITERIA MAY BE WAIVED.— 
(1) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Effective as of May 22, 2009, sec-
tion 2366b(d) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
by section 205(a)(1) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform 
Act of 2009 (123 Stat. 1724), is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘specified in para-
graph (1) or (2) of subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘specified 
in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a)’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘specified in para-
graphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘specified 
in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a)’’. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 2366b 
note. 
10 USC 2366a 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00811
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4266 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) DETERMINATION REGARDING SATISFACTION OF CERTIFI-
CATION COMPONENTS.—Effective as of May 22, 2009, and as 
if included therein as enacted, section 205(b)(1) of the Weapon 
Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2366b note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘certification components specified in 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) of section 2366b of 
title 10, United States Code’’ and inserting ‘‘certification compo-
nents specified in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection 
(a) of section 2366b of title 10, United States Code’’. 
(e) CORRECTION TO REFERENCE.—Effective as of May 22, 2009, 
and as if included therein as enacted, section 205(c) of the Weapon 
Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2433a note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘section 2433a(c)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 
2433a(c)(1)(C)’’. 
SEC. 814. INCLUSION OF MAJOR SUBPROGRAMS TO MAJOR DEFENSE 
ACQUISITION PROGRAMS UNDER VARIOUS ACQUISITION- 
RELATED REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 2430a(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subpara-
graphs (A) and (B), respectively; 
(2) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘If the Secretary’’; 
(3) in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by inserting 
‘‘(other than as provided in paragraph (2))’’ before the semicolon; 
and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) For a major defense acquisition program for which a des-
ignation of a major subprogram has been made under subsection 
(a), unit costs under this chapter shall be submitted in accordance 
with the definitions in subsection (d).’’. 
(b) MILESTONE A APPROVAL CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.— 
Section 2366a of such title is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘a major defense 
acquisition program certified by the Milestone Decision 
Authority under subsection (a), if the projected cost of 
the program’’ and inserting ‘‘a major defense acquisition 
program certified by the Milestone Decision Authority 
under subsection (a) or a designated major subprogram 
of such program, if the projected cost of the program or 
subprogram’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or designated major 
subprogram’’ after ‘‘major defense acquisition program’’; 
and 
(2) in subsection (c)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) 
as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; and 
(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) The term ‘designated major subprogram’ means a major 
subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated 
under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.’’. 
(c) MILESTONE B APPROVAL CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.— 
Section 2366b of such title is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(1)— 
Definition. 
Effective date. 
Effective date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00812
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4267 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) by striking ‘‘any changes to the program’’ and 
inserting ‘‘any changes to the program or a designated 
major subprogram of such program’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘otherwise cause 
the program’’ and inserting ‘‘otherwise cause the program 
or subprogram’’; and 
(2) in subsection (g)— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as 
paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; and 
(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) The term ‘designated major subprogram’ means a major 
subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated 
under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.’’. 
(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 2399.—Subsection 
(a) of section 2399 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(a) CONDITION FOR PROCEEDING BEYOND LOW-RATE INITIAL 
PRODUCTION.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide that a 
covered major defense acquisition program or a covered designated 
major subprogram may not proceed beyond low-rate initial produc-
tion until initial operational test and evaluation of the program 
or subprogram is completed. 
‘‘(2) In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) The term ‘covered major defense acquisition program’ 
means a major defense acquisition program that involves the 
acquisition of a weapon system that is a major system within 
the meaning of that term in section 2302(5) of this title. 
‘‘(B) The term ‘covered designated major subprogram’ 
means 
a 
major 
subprogram 
designated 
under 
section 
2430a(a)(1) of this title that is a major subprogram of a covered 
major defense acquisition program.’’. 
(e) CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS
TO
SECTION
2434.—Section 
2434(a) of such title is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The Secretary of Defense’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) The provisions of this section shall apply to any major 
subprogram of a major defense acquisition program (as designated 
under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title) in the same manner as 
those provisions apply to a major defense acquisition program, 
and any reference in this section to a program shall be treated 
as including such a subprogram.’’. 
Subtitle C—Amendments to General Con-
tracting Authorities, Procedures, and 
Limitations 
SEC. 821. PROVISIONS RELATING TO FIRE RESISTANT FIBER FOR 
PRODUCTION OF MILITARY UNIFORMS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Section 829 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 229; 
10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is amended in subsection (f) by striking 
‘‘on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on January 1, 2015’’. 
Applicability. 
Definitions. 
10 USC 2399. 
Definition. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00813
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4268 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) PROHIBITION
ON
SPECIFICATION
IN
SOLICITATIONS.—No 
solicitation issued before January 1, 2015, by the Department of 
Defense may include a requirement that proposals submitted pursu-
ant to such solicitation must include the use of fire resistant rayon 
fiber. 
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 15, 2011, the Comp-
troller General of the United States shall submit to the Commit-
tees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Rep-
resentatives a report on the supply chain for fire resistant 
fiber for the production of military uniforms. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
include, at a minimum, an analysis of the following: 
(A) The current and anticipated sources of fire resistant 
rayon fiber for the production of military uniforms. 
(B) The extent to which fire resistant rayon fiber has 
unique properties that provide advantages for the produc-
tion of military uniforms. 
(C) The extent to which the efficient procurement of 
fire resistant rayon fiber for the production of military 
uniforms is impeded by existing statutory or regulatory 
requirements. 
(D) The actions the Department of Defense has taken 
to identify alternatives to fire resistant rayon fiber for 
the production of military uniforms. 
(E) The extent to which such alternatives provide an 
adequate substitute for fire resistant rayon fiber for the 
production of military uniforms. 
(F) The impediments to the use of such alternatives, 
and the actions the Department has taken to overcome 
such impediments. 
(G) The extent to which uncertainty regarding the 
future availability of fire resistant rayon fiber results in 
instability or inefficiency for elements of the United States 
textile industry that use fire resistant rayon fiber, and 
the extent to which that instability or inefficiency results 
in less efficient business practices, impedes investment and 
innovation, and thereby results or may result in higher 
costs, delayed delivery, or a lower quality of product deliv-
ered to the Government. 
(H) The extent to which any modifications to existing 
law or regulation may be necessary to ensure the efficient 
acquisition of fire resistant fiber or alternative fire resistant 
products for the production of military uniforms. 
SEC. 822. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN PROCUREMENTS 
FROM FIRMS IN THE SMALL ARMS PRODUCTION INDUS-
TRIAL BASE. 
(a) REPEAL.—Section 2473 of title 10, United States Code, is 
repealed. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 146 of such title is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 2473. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00814
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4269 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 823. REVIEW OF REGULATORY DEFINITION RELATING TO 
PRODUCTION OF SPECIALTY METALS. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall review 
the regulations specified in subsection (b) to ensure that the defini-
tion of the term ‘‘produce’’ in such regulations complies with the 
requirements of section 2533b of title 10, United States Code. 
In carrying out the review, the Secretary shall seek public comment, 
consider congressional intent, and revise the regulations as the 
Secretary considers necessary and appropriate. 
(b) REGULATIONS SPECIFIED.—The regulations referred to in 
subsection (a) are any portion of subpart 252.2 of the defense 
supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that includes 
a definition of the term ‘‘produce’’ for purposes of implementing 
section 2533b of title 10, United States Code. 
(c) COMPLETION OF REVIEW.—The Secretary shall complete the 
review required by subsection (a) and any necessary and appropriate 
revisions to the defense supplement to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
SEC. 824. GUIDANCE RELATING TO RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA. 
(a) REVIEW OF GUIDANCE.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
review guidance issued by the military departments on the 
implementation of section 2320(e) of title 10, United States Code, 
to ensure that such guidance is consistent with the guidance issued 
by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics and the requirements of this section. Such guidance 
shall be designed to ensure that the United States— 
(1) preserves the option of competition for contracts for 
the production and sustainment of systems or subsystems that 
are developed exclusively with Federal funds as defined in 
accordance with the amendments made by this section; and 
(2) is not required to pay more than once for the same 
technical data. 
(b) RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA.—Section 2320(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2)(F)(i)— 
(A) by redesignating subclauses (I) and (II) as sub-
clauses (II) and (III), respectively; and 
(B) by inserting before subclause (II), as so redesig-
nated, the following new subclause (I): 
‘‘(I) rights in technical data described in subpara-
graph (A) for which a use or release restriction has 
been erroneously asserted by a contractor or subcon-
tractor;’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘for the purposes of defini-
tions under this paragraph’’ and inserting ‘‘for the purposes 
of paragraph (2)(B), but shall be considered to be Federal 
funds for the purposes of paragraph (2)(A)’’. 
(c) VALIDATION OF PROPRIETARY DATA RESTRICTIONS.—Section 
2321(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘A challenge’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a challenge’’; 
and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph 
(C): 
10 USC 2320 
note. 
Deadline. 
Public comment. 
10 USC 2533b 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00815
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4270 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) The limitation in this paragraph shall not apply to a 
case in which the Secretary finds that reasonable grounds exist 
to believe that a contractor or subcontractor has erroneously 
asserted a use or release restriction with regard to technical data 
described in section 2320(a)(2)(A) of this title.’’. 
SEC. 825. EXTENSION OF SUNSET DATE FOR CERTAIN PROTESTS OF 
TASK AND DELIVERY ORDER CONTRACTS. 
Paragraph (3) of section 2304c(e) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(3) Paragraph (1)(B) and paragraph (2) of this subsection shall 
not be in effect after September 30, 2016.’’. 
SEC. 826. INCLUSION OF OPTION AMOUNTS IN LIMITATIONS ON 
AUTHORITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CARRY 
OUT CERTAIN PROTOTYPE PROJECTS. 
Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1994 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘(including all 
options)’’ after ‘‘not in excess of $100,000,000’’; and 
(B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘(including all 
options)’’ after ‘‘in excess of $100,000,000’’; and 
(2) in subsection (e)(3)(A), by inserting ‘‘(including all 
options)’’ after ‘‘does not exceed $50,000,000’’. 
SEC. 827. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION CHAL-
LENGE PROGRAM; PILOT EXPANSION OF PROGRAM. 
(a) PERMANENT AUTHORITY.—Section 2359b of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking subsections (j) and (k); and 
(2) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (j). 
(b) PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 2359b of title 10, United States 
Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection (k): 
‘‘(k) PILOT PROGRAM
FOR PROGRAMS OTHER THAN MAJOR 
DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall carry out a pilot 
program to expand the use of the authority provided in this 
section to provide opportunities for the introduction of innova-
tive and cost-saving approaches to programs other than major 
defense acquisition programs through the submission, review, 
and implementation, where appropriate, of qualifying proposals. 
‘‘(2) QUALIFYING
PROPOSALS.—For purposes of this sub-
section, a qualifying proposal is an offer to supply a nondevelop-
mental item that— 
‘‘(A) is evaluated as achieving a level of performance 
that is at least equal to the level of performance of an 
item being procured under a covered acquisition program 
and as providing savings in excess of 15 percent after 
considering all costs to the Government of implementing 
such proposal; or 
‘‘(B) is evaluated as achieving a level of performance 
that is significantly better than the level of performance 
of an item being procured under a covered acquisition 
program without any increase in cost to the Government. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00816
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4271 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(3) REVIEW
PROCEDURES.—The Under Secretary shall 
adopt modifications as may be needed to the procedures 
applicable to the Challenge Program to provide for Department 
of Defense review of, and action on, qualifying proposals. Such 
procedures shall include, at a minimum, the issuance of a 
broad agency announcement inviting interested parties to 
submit qualifying proposals in areas of interest to the Depart-
ment. 
‘‘(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 
‘‘(A) 
NONDEVELOPMENTAL
ITEM.—The 
term 
‘non-
developmental item’ has the meaning given that term in 
section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act 
(41 U.S.C. 403). 
‘‘(B) COVERED ACQUISITION PROGRAM.—The term ‘cov-
ered acquisition program’ means any acquisition program 
of the Department of Defense other than a major defense 
acquisition program, but does not include any contract 
awarded under an exception to competitive acquisition 
authorized by the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et 
seq.) 
‘‘(C) LEVEL
OF
PERFORMANCE.—The term ‘level of 
performance’, with respect to a nondevelopmental item, 
means the extent to which the item demonstrates required 
item functional characteristics. 
‘‘(5) SUNSET.—The authority to carry out the pilot program 
under this subsection shall terminate on the date that is five 
years after the date of the enactment of this Act.’’. 
SEC. 828. ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS. 
(a) COMPETITION
REQUIREMENTS
FOR
TASK
OR
DELIVERY 
ORDERS UNDER ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS.—Sec-
tion 801 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 
8287) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(c) TASK OR DELIVERY ORDERS.—(1) The head of a Federal 
agency may issue a task or delivery order under an energy savings 
performance contract by— 
‘‘(A) notifying all contractors that have received an award 
under such contract that the agency proposes to discuss energy 
savings performance services for some or all of its facilities 
and, following a reasonable period of time to provide a proposal 
in response to the notice, soliciting from such contractors the 
submission of expressions of interest in, and contractor quali-
fications for, performing site surveys or investigations and feasi-
bility designs and studies, and including in the notice summary 
information concerning energy use for any facilities that the 
agency has specific interest in including in such task or delivery 
order; 
‘‘(B) reviewing all expressions of interest and qualifications 
submitted pursuant to the notice under subparagraph (A); 
‘‘(C) selecting two or more contractors (from among those 
reviewed under subparagraph (B)) to conduct discussions con-
cerning the contractors’ respective qualifications to implement 
potential energy conservation measures, including— 
‘‘(i) requesting references and specific detailed exam-
ples with respect to similar efforts and the resulting energy 
savings of such similar efforts; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00817
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4272 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(ii) requesting an explanation of how such similar 
efforts relate to the scope and content of the task or delivery 
order concerned; 
‘‘(D) selecting and authorizing— 
‘‘(i) more than one contractor (from among those 
selected under subparagraph (C)) to conduct site surveys, 
investigations, feasibility designs and studies, or similar 
assessments for the energy savings performance contract 
services (or for discrete portions of such services), for the 
purpose of allowing each such contractor to submit a firm, 
fixed-price proposal to implement specific energy conserva-
tion measures; or 
‘‘(ii) one contractor (from among those selected under 
subparagraph (C)) to conduct a site survey, investigation, 
feasibility design and study, or similar assessment for the 
purpose of allowing the contractor to submit a firm, fixed- 
price proposal to implement specific energy conservation 
measures; 
‘‘(E) providing a debriefing to any contractor not selected 
under subparagraph (D); 
‘‘(F) negotiating a task or delivery order for energy savings 
performance contracting services with the contractor or contrac-
tors selected under subparagraph (D) based on the energy 
conservation measures identified; and 
‘‘(G) issuing a task or delivery order for energy savings 
performance contracting services to such contractor or contrac-
tors. 
‘‘(2) The issuance of a task or delivery order for energy savings 
performance contracting services pursuant to paragraph (1) is 
deemed to satisfy the task and delivery order competition require-
ments in section 2304c(d) of title 10, United States Code, and 
section 303J(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services 
Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253j(d)). 
‘‘(3) The Secretary may issue guidance as necessary to agencies 
issuing task or delivery orders pursuant to paragraph (1).’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 
is inapplicable to task or delivery orders issued before the date 
of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 829. DEFINITION OF MATERIALS CRITICAL TO NATIONAL SECU-
RITY. 
(a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 187 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘materials critical to national security’ means 
materials— 
‘‘(A) upon which the production or sustainment of mili-
tary equipment is dependent; and 
‘‘(B) the supply of which could be restricted by actions 
or events outside the control of the Government of the 
United States. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘military equipment’ means equipment used 
directly by the armed forces to carry out military operations. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘secure supply’, with respect to a material, 
means the availability of a source or sources for the material, 
including the full supply chain for the material and components 
containing the material.’’. 
42 USC 8287 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00818
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4273 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) AMENDMENT RELATING TO DUTIES.—Subsection (b) of section 
187 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) DUTIES.—In addition to other matters assigned to it by 
the Secretary of Defense, the Board shall— 
‘‘(1) determine the need to provide a long term secure 
supply of materials designated as critical to national security 
to ensure that national defense needs are met; 
‘‘(2) analyze the risk associated with each material des-
ignated as critical to national security and the effect on national 
defense that the nonavailability of such material would have; 
‘‘(3) recommend a strategy to the President to ensure a 
secure supply of materials designated as critical to national 
security; 
‘‘(4) recommend such other strategies to the President as 
the Board considers appropriate to strengthen the industrial 
base with respect to materials critical to national security; 
and 
‘‘(5) publish not less frequently than once every two years 
in the Federal Register recommendations regarding materials 
critical to national security, including a list of specialty metals, 
if any, recommended for addition to, or removal from, the 
definition of ‘specialty metal’ for purposes of section 2533b 
of this title.’’. 
Subtitle D—Contractor Matters 
SEC. 831. OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF CONTRACTORS PER-
FORMING PRIVATE SECURITY FUNCTIONS IN AREAS OF 
COMBAT OPERATIONS. 
(a) ENHANCEMENT OF OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY.—Sec-
tion 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(2)— 
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘comply with regu-
lations’’ and inserting ‘‘ensure that the contractor and all 
employees of the contractor or any subcontractor who are 
responsible for performing private security functions under 
such contract comply with regulations’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘comply with’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘in accordance with’’ and inserting ‘‘ensure 
that the contractor and all employees of the contractor 
or any subcontractor who are responsible for per-
forming private security functions under such contract 
comply with’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(C) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at 
the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(D) by adding at the end the following new subpara-
graph: 
‘‘(D) ensure that the contract clause is included in 
subcontracts awarded to any subcontractor at any tier who 
is responsible for performing private security functions 
under the contract.’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
(f) and (g), respectively; and 
Deadline. 
Federal Register, 
publication. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
Strategies. 
Strategy. 
Determination. 
10 USC 187. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00819
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4274 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new sub-
sections: 
‘‘(c) OVERSIGHT.—It shall be the responsibility of the head of 
the contracting activity responsible for each covered contract to 
ensure that the contracting activity takes appropriate steps to 
assign sufficient oversight personnel to the contract to— 
‘‘(1) ensure that the contractor responsible for performing 
private security functions under such contract comply with 
the regulatory requirements prescribed pursuant to subsection 
(a) and the contract requirements established pursuant to sub-
section (b); and 
‘‘(2) make the determinations required by subsection (d). 
‘‘(d) REMEDIES.—The failure of a contractor under a covered 
contract to comply with the requirements of the regulations pre-
scribed under subsection (a) or the contract clause inserted in 
a covered contract pursuant to subsection (b), as determined by 
the contracting officer for the covered contract— 
‘‘(1) shall be included in appropriate databases of past 
performance and considered in any responsibility determination 
or evaluation of the past performance of the contractor for 
the purpose of a contract award decision, as provided in section 
6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
405(j)); 
‘‘(2) in the case of an award fee contract— 
‘‘(A) shall be considered in any evaluation of contract 
performance by the contractor for the relevant award fee 
period; and 
‘‘(B) may be a basis for reducing or denying award 
fees for such period, or for recovering all or part of award 
fees previously paid for such period; and 
‘‘(3) in the case of a failure to comply that is severe, 
prolonged, or repeated— 
‘‘(A) shall be referred to the suspension or debarment 
official for the appropriate agency; and 
‘‘(B) may be a basis for suspension or debarment of 
the contractor. 
‘‘(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The duty of a contractor under 
a covered contract to comply with the requirements of the regula-
tions prescribed under subsection (a) and the contract clause 
inserted into a covered contract pursuant to subsection (b), and 
the availability of the remedies provided in subsection (d), shall 
not be reduced or diminished by the failure of a higher or lower 
tier contractor under such contract to comply with such require-
ments, or by a failure of the contracting activity to provide the 
oversight required by subsection (c).’’. 
(b) REVISED REGULATIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSE.— 
(1) DEADLINE FOR REGULATIONS.—Not later than 60 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall revise the regulations prescribed pursuant 
to section 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) 
to incorporate the requirements of the amendments made by 
subsection (a). 
(2) COMMENCEMENT OF APPLICABILITY OF REVISIONS.—The 
revision of regulations under paragraph (1) shall apply to the 
following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00820
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4275 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) Any contract that is awarded on or after the date 
that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
(B) Any task or delivery order that is issued on or 
after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act pursuant to a contract that is awarded 
before, on, or after the date that is 120 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
(3) COMMENCEMENT OF INCLUSION OF CONTRACT CLAUSE.— 
A contract clause that reflects the revision of regulations 
required by the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
inserted, as required by such section 862, into the following: 
(A) Any contract described in paragraph (2)(A). 
(B) Any task or delivery order described in paragraph 
(2)(B). 
SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF REGULATIONS ON CONTRACTORS PER-
FORMING PRIVATE SECURITY FUNCTIONS TO AREAS OF 
OTHER SIGNIFICANT MILITARY OPERATIONS. 
(a) AREAS OF OTHER SIGNIFICANT MILITARY OPERATIONS.—Sec-
tion 862 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note), as amended by 
section 831, is further amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘combat operations’’ each place it appears 
and inserting ‘‘combat operations or other significant military 
operations’’; and 
(2) in subsection (f), as redesignated by such section 831— 
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as 
paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), respectively; 
(B) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by inserting ‘‘either’’ after ‘‘constituting’’; and 
(ii) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In making 
designations under this paragraph, the Secretary shall 
ensure that an area is not designated in whole or 
part as both an area of combat operations and an 
area of other significant military operations.’’; and 
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) OTHER SIGNIFICANT MILITARY OPERATIONS.—For pur-
poses of this section, the term ‘other significant military oper-
ations’ means activities, other than combat operations, as part 
of an overseas contingency operation that are carried out by 
United States Armed Forces in an uncontrolled or unpredictable 
high-threat environment where personnel performing security 
functions may be called upon to use deadly force.’’. 
(b) ADDITIONAL AREAS CONSIDERED FOR DESIGNATION.— 
(1) DETERMINATION
REQUIRED
FOR
CERTAIN
AREAS.—Not 
later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make a written determina-
tion for each of the following areas regarding whether or not 
the area constitutes an area of combat operations or an area 
of other significant military operations for purposes of designa-
tion as such an area under section 862 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 
10 U.S.C. 2302 note), as amended by this section: 
(A) The Horn of Africa region. 
(B) Yemen. 
Deadline. 
Definition. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00821
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4276 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) The Philippines. 
(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a copy of each written determination under paragraph (1), 
together with an explanation of the basis for such determina-
tion. 
(c) LIMITATION AND EXCEPTION.—Section 862 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 
181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note), as amended by subsection (a) and by 
section 831, is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (g), as redesignated by such 
section 831, as subsection (h) and inserting after subsection 
(f) the following new subsection (g): 
‘‘(g) LIMITATION.—With respect to an area of other significant 
military operations, the requirements of this section shall apply 
only upon agreement of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
of State. An agreement of the Secretaries under this subsection 
may be made only on an area-by-area basis. With respect to an 
area of combat operations, the requirements of this section shall 
always apply.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (h), as so redesignated— 
(A) by striking the subsection designation and ‘‘EXCEP-
TION.—’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(h) EXCEPTIONS.— 
‘‘(1) INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.—’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) NONGOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS.—The require-
ments of this section shall not apply to a nonprofit nongovern-
mental organization receiving grants or cooperative agreements 
for activities conducted within an area of other significant 
military operations if the Secretary of Defense and the Sec-
retary of State agree that such organization may be exempted. 
An exemption may be granted by the agreement of the Secre-
taries under this paragraph on an organization-by-organization 
or area-by-area basis. Such an exemption may not be granted 
with respect to an area of combat operations.’’. 
(d) REPORT
ON IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 180 days 
after a designation of an area as an area of combat operations 
or an area of other significant military operations pursuant to 
subsection (b)(2), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with 
the Secretary of State, shall submit to Congress a report on steps 
taken or planned to be taken to implement the regulations pre-
scribed under section 862 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 
note) in such area. In the case of any agreement by the Secretaries 
to limit the applicability of such section or exempt nongovernmental 
organizations from such section, pursuant to subsections (g) or 
(h)(1) of such section (as added by subsection (c)), the report shall 
document the basis for such agreement. 
SEC. 833. STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION FOR PRIVATE SECURITY 
CONTRACTORS. 
(a) REVIEW OF THIRD-PARTY STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION 
PROCESSES.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) determine whether the private sector has developed— 
Determination. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
Applicability. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00822
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4277 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) operational and business practice standards 
applicable to private security contractors; and 
(B) third-party certification processes for determining 
whether private security contractors adhere to standards 
described in subparagraph (A); and 
(2) review any standards and processes identified pursuant 
to paragraph (1) to determine whether the application of such 
standards and processes will make a substantial contribution 
to the successful performance of private security functions in 
areas of combat operations or other significant military oper-
ations. 
(b) REVISED REGULATIONS.—Not later than 270 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
revise the regulations promulgated under section 862 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) to ensure that such regula-
tions— 
(1) establish criteria for defining standard practices for 
the performance of private security functions, which shall 
reflect input from industry representatives as well as the 
Inspector General of the Department of Defense; and 
(2) establish criteria for weapons training programs for 
contractors performing private security functions, including 
minimum requirements for weapons training programs of 
instruction and minimum qualifications for instructors for such 
programs. 
(c) INCLUSION OF THIRD-PARTY STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATIONS 
IN REVISED REGULATIONS.— 
(1) STANDARDS.—If the Secretary determines that the 
application of operational and business practice standards 
identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) will make a substan-
tial contribution to the successful performance of private secu-
rity functions in areas of combat operations or other significant 
military operations, the revised regulations promulgated pursu-
ant to subsection (b) shall incorporate a requirement to comply 
with such standards, subject to such exceptions as the Secretary 
may determine to be necessary. 
(2) CERTIFICATIONS.—If the Secretary determines that the 
application of a third-party certification process identified 
pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(B) will make a substantial con-
tribution to the successful performance of private security func-
tions in areas of combat operations or other significant military 
operations, the revised regulations promulgated pursuant to 
subsection (b) may provide for the consideration of such certifi-
cations as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for award 
of a covered contract for the provision of private security func-
tions, subject to such exceptions as the Secretary may determine 
to be necessary. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) COVERED
CONTRACT.—The term ‘‘covered contract’’ 
means— 
(A) a contract of the Department of Defense for the 
performance of services; 
(B) a subcontract at any tier under such a contract; 
or 
(C) a task order or delivery order issued under such 
a contract or subcontract. 
Deadline. 
Criteria. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00823
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4278 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘‘contractor’’ means, with 
respect to a covered contract, the contractor or subcontractor 
carrying out the covered contract. 
(3) PRIVATE SECURITY FUNCTIONS.—The term ‘‘private secu-
rity functions’’ means activities engaged in by a contractor 
under a covered contract as follows: 
(A) Guarding of personnel, facilities, or property of 
a Federal agency, the contractor or subcontractor, or a 
third party. 
(B) Any other activity for which personnel are required 
to carry weapons in the performance of their duties. 
(e) EXCEPTION.—The requirements of this section shall not 
apply to contracts entered into by elements of the intelligence 
community in support of intelligence activities. 
SEC. 834. ENHANCEMENTS OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
TO REDUCE OR DENY AWARD FEES TO COMPANIES FOUND 
TO JEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF GOVERN-
MENT PERSONNEL. 
(a) EXPANSION OF DISPOSITIONS SUBJECT TO AUTHORITY.—Sec-
tion 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2412; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) 
is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(5) In an administrative proceeding, a final determination 
of contractor fault by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to 
subsection (d).’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections 
(e) and (f), respectively; and 
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new sub-
section (d): 
‘‘(d) DETERMINATIONS OF CONTRACTOR FAULT BY SECRETARY 
OF DEFENSE.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In any case described by paragraph (2), 
the Secretary of Defense shall— 
‘‘(A) provide for an expeditious independent investiga-
tion of the causes of the serious bodily injury or death 
alleged to have been caused by the contractor as described 
in that paragraph; and 
‘‘(B) make a final determination, pursuant to proce-
dures established by the Secretary for purposes of this 
subsection, whether the contractor, in the performance of 
a covered contract, caused such serious bodily injury or 
death through gross negligence or with reckless disregard 
for the safety of civilian or military personnel of the Govern-
ment. 
‘‘(2) COVERED CASES.—A case described in this paragraph 
is any case in which the Secretary has reason to believe that— 
‘‘(A) a contractor, in the performance of a covered con-
tract, may have caused the serious bodily injury or death 
of any civilian or military personnel of the Government; 
and 
‘‘(B) such contractor is not subject to the jurisdiction 
of United States courts. 
‘‘(3) CONSTRUCTION OF DETERMINATION.—A final determina-
tion under this subsection may be used only for the purpose 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00824
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4279 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
of evaluating contractor performance, and shall not be deter-
minative of fault for any other purpose.’’. 
(b) DEFINITION OF CONTRACTOR.—Paragraph (1) of subsection 
(e) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2) of this 
section, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘contractor’ means a company awarded a 
covered contract and a subcontractor at any tier under such 
contract.’’. 
(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c) of such section is 
further amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking 
‘‘subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 
(d) INCLUSION OF DETERMINATIONS OF CONTRACTOR FAULT IN 
DATABASE FOR FEDERAL AGENCY CONTRACT AND GRANT OFFICERS 
AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT OFFICIALS.—Section 872(c)(1) of 
the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4556) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(E) In an administrative proceeding, a final deter-
mination of contractor fault by the Secretary of Defense 
pursuant to section 823(d) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2302 
note).’’. 
(e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The requirements of section 823 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as 
amended by subsections (a) through (c), shall apply with respect 
to the following: 
(1) Any contract entered into on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act. 
(2) Any task order or delivery order issued on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act under a contract entered 
into before, on, or after that date. 
SEC. 835. ANNUAL JOINT REPORT AND COMPTROLLER GENERAL 
REVIEW ON CONTRACTING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. 
Section 863 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 863. ANNUAL JOINT REPORT AND COMPTROLLER GENERAL 
REVIEW ON CONTRACTING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. 
‘‘(a) JOINT REPORT REQUIRED.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (6), 
every 12 months, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 
State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
International Development shall submit to the relevant commit-
tees of Congress a joint report on contracts in Iraq or Afghani-
stan. 
‘‘(2) PRIMARY MATTERS COVERED.—A report under this sub-
section shall, at a minimum, cover the following with respect 
to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan during the reporting 
period: 
‘‘(A) Total number of contracts awarded. 
‘‘(B) Total number of active contracts. 
‘‘(C) Total value of all contracts awarded. 
‘‘(D) Total value of active contracts. 
‘‘(E) The extent to which such contracts have used 
competitive procedures. 
Applicability. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
41 USC 2313. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00825
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4280 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(F) Total number of contractor personnel working on 
contracts at the end of each quarter of the reporting period. 
‘‘(G) Total number of contractor personnel who are 
performing security functions at the end of each quarter 
of the reporting period. 
‘‘(H) Total number of contractor personnel killed or 
wounded. 
‘‘(3) ADDITIONAL MATTERS COVERED.—A report under this 
subsection shall also cover the following: 
‘‘(A) The sources of information and data used to com-
pile the information required under paragraph (2). 
‘‘(B) A description of any known limitations of the 
data reported under paragraph (2), including known limita-
tions of the methodology and data sources used to compile 
the report. 
‘‘(C) Any plans for strengthening collection, coordina-
tion, and sharing of information on contracts in Iraq and 
Afghanistan through improvements to the common data-
bases identified under section 861(b)(4). 
‘‘(4) REPORTING PERIOD.—A report under this subsection 
shall cover a period of not less than 12 months. 
‘‘(5) SUBMISSION
OF
REPORTS.—The Secretaries and the 
Administrator shall submit an initial report under this sub-
section not later than February 1, 2011, and shall submit 
an updated report by February 1 of every year thereafter until 
February 1, 2013. 
‘‘(6) EXCEPTION.—If the total annual amount of obligations 
for contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan combined is less than 
$250,000,000 for the reporting period, for all three agencies 
combined, the Secretaries and the Administrator may submit, 
in lieu of a report, a letter stating the applicability of this 
paragraph, with such documentation as the Secretaries and 
the Administrator consider appropriate. 
‘‘(7) ESTIMATES.—In determining the total number of con-
tractor personnel working on contracts under paragraph (2)(F), 
the Secretaries and the Administrator may use estimates for 
any category of contractor personnel for which they determine 
it is not feasible to provide an actual count. The report shall 
fully disclose the extent to which estimates are used in lieu 
of an actual count. 
‘‘(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW AND REPORT.— 
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Within 180 days after submission of 
each annual joint report required under subsection (a), but 
in no case later than August 5 of each year until 2013, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall review the 
joint report and submit to the relevant committees of Congress 
a report on such review. 
‘‘(2) MATTERS COVERED.—A report under this subsection 
shall, at minimum— 
‘‘(A) assess the data and data sources used in devel-
oping the joint report; 
‘‘(B) review how the Department of Defense, the 
Department of State, and the United States Agency for 
International Development are using the data and the data 
sources used to develop the joint report in managing, over-
seeing, and coordinating contracting in Iraq and Afghani-
stan; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00826
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4281 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) assess the plans of the departments and agency 
for strengthening or improving the common databases 
identified under section 861(b)(4); and 
‘‘(D) review and make recommendations on any specific 
contract or class of contracts that the Comptroller General 
determines raises issues of significant concern. 
‘‘(3) ACCESS TO DATABASES AND OTHER INFORMATION.—The 
Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Adminis-
trator of the United States Agency for International Develop-
ment shall provide to the Comptroller General full access to 
information on contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan for the pur-
poses of the review carried out under this subsection, including 
the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4).’’. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 841. IMPROVEMENTS TO STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONING OF 
JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL. 
(a) VICE CHAIRMAN OF JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF TO BE CHAIRMAN 
OF COUNCIL.—Subsection (c) of section 181 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘Vice’’ before ‘‘Chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, other than the Chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,’’ and inserting ‘‘under subpara-
graphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (1)’’; and 
(3) by striking paragraph (3). 
(b) ROLE OF COMMANDERS OF COMBATANT COMMANDS AS MEM-
BERS OF COUNCIL.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of such section 
is further amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 
(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(F) in addition, when directed by the chairman, the com-
mander of any combatant command (or, as directed by that 
commander, the deputy commander of that command) when 
matters related to the area of responsibility or functions of 
that command will be under consideration by the Council.’’. 
(c) CIVILIAN ADVISORS.— 
(1) ADDITIONAL CIVILIAN ADVISORS.—Subsection (d) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘The Under Secretary’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘and expertise.’’ and inserting: ‘‘The 
following officials of the Department of Defense shall serve 
as advisors to the Council on matters within their authority 
and expertise: 
‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics. 
‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). 
‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. 
‘‘(D) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
Evaluation. 
‘‘(E) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 
‘‘(F) Such other civilian officials of the Department 
of Defense as are designated by the Secretary of Defense 
for purposes of this subsection.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00827
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4282 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(3) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics, and the Director of Cost Assessment 
and Performance Evaluation’’ and inserting ‘‘advisors to the 
Council under subsection (d)’’. 
(d) RECOGNITION OF PERMANENT NATURE OF COUNCIL.—Sub-
section (a) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘The Secretary 
of Defense shall establish’’ and inserting ‘‘There is’’. 
SEC. 842. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY ON ACQUISITION AND 
PERFORMANCE OF SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS AND SERV-
ICES. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds the following: 
(1) Executive Order No. 13514, dated October 5, 2009, 
requires the departments and agencies of the Federal Govern-
ment to establish an integrated strategy towards the procure-
ment of sustainable products and services. 
(2) The Department of Defense Strategic Sustainability 
Performance Plan, issued in August 2010, provides a framework 
for the Department’s compliance with Executive Order No. 
13514 and other applicable sustainability requirements. 
(b) REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 
the status of the achievement by the Department of Defense 
of the objectives and goals on the procurement of sustainable 
products and services established by section 2(h) of Executive 
Order No. 13514. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 
include the following: 
(A) A description of the actions taken, and to be taken, 
by the Department to identify particular sustainable prod-
ucts and services that contribute to the achievement of 
the objectives and goals described in paragraph (1). 
(B) An assessment of the tools available to the Depart-
ment to promote the use of particular sustainable products 
and services identified pursuant to the actions described 
in subparagraph (A) across the Department, and a descrip-
tion of the actions taken, and to be taken, by the Depart-
ment to use such tools. 
(C) A description of strategies and tools identified by 
the Department that could assist the other departments 
and agencies of the Federal Government in procuring 
sustainable products and services, including a description 
of mechanisms for sharing best practices in such procure-
ment, as identified by the Department, among the other 
departments and agencies of the Federal Government. 
(D) An assessment of the progress the Department 
has made toward the achievement of the objectives and 
goals described in paragraph (1), including the scorecard 
identified in its Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan. 
SEC. 843. ASSESSMENT AND PLAN FOR CRITICAL RARE EARTH MATE-
RIALS IN DEFENSE APPLICATIONS. 
(a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.— 
10 USC 181. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00828
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4283 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall undertake 
an assessment of the supply and demand for rare earth mate-
rials in defense applications and identify which, if any, rare 
earth material meets both of the following criteria: 
(A) The rare earth material is critical to the production, 
sustainment, or operation of significant United States mili-
tary equipment. 
(B) The rare earth material is subject to interruption 
of supply, based on actions or events outside the control 
of the Government of the United States. 
(2) EVALUATION OF SUPPLY.—The assessment shall include 
a comprehensive evaluation of the long-term security and avail-
ability of all aspects of the supply chain for rare earth materials 
in defense applications, particularly the location and number 
of sources at each step of the supply chain, including— 
(A) mining of rare earth ores; 
(B) separation of rare earth oxides; 
(C) refining and reduction of rare earth metals; 
(D) creation of rare earth alloys; 
(E) manufacturing of components and systems con-
taining rare earth materials; and 
(F) recycling of components and systems to reclaim 
and reuse rare earth materials. 
(3) EVALUATION OF DEMAND.—The assessment shall include 
a comprehensive evaluation of the demand for and usage of 
rare earth materials in all defense applications, including— 
(A) approximations of the total amounts of individual 
rare earth materials used in defense applications; 
(B) determinations of which, if any, defense applica-
tions are dependent upon rare earth materials for proper 
operation and functioning; and 
(C) assessments of the feasibility of alternatives to 
usage of rare earth materials in defense applications. 
(4) OTHER STUDIES AND AGENCIES.—Any applicable studies 
conducted by the Department of Defense, the Comptroller Gen-
eral of the United States, or other Federal agencies during 
fiscal year 2010 may be considered as partial fulfillment of 
the requirements of this section. The Secretary may consider 
the views of other Federal agencies, as appropriate. 
(5) SPECIFIC MATERIAL INCLUDED.—At a minimum, the Sec-
retary shall identify sintered neodymium iron boron magnets 
as meeting the criteria specified in paragraph (1). 
(b) PLAN.—For each rare earth material identified pursuant 
to subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall develop a plan to ensure 
the long-term availability of such rare earth material, with a goal 
of establishing an assured source of supply of such material in 
critical defense applications by December 31, 2015. In developing 
the plan, the Secretary shall consider all aspects of the material’s 
supply chain, as described in subsection (a)(2). The plan shall 
include consideration of numerous risk mitigation methods with 
respect to the material, including— 
(1) an assessment of including the material in the National 
Defense Stockpile; 
(2) in consultation with the United States Trade Represent-
ative, the identification of any trade practices known to the 
Secretary that limit the Secretary’s ability to ensure the long- 
term availability of such material or the ability to meet the 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00829
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4284 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
goal of establishing an assured source of supply of such material 
by December 31, 2015; 
(3) an assessment of the availability of financing to 
industry, academic institutions, or not-for-profit entities to pro-
vide the capacity required to ensure the availability of the 
material, as well as potential mechanisms to increase the avail-
ability of such financing; 
(4) an assessment of the benefits, if any, of Defense Produc-
tion Act funding to support the establishment of an assured 
source of supply for military components; 
(5) an assessment of funding for research and development 
related to any aspect of the rare earth material supply chain 
or research on alternatives and substitutes; 
(6) any other risk mitigation method determined appro-
priate by the Secretary that is consistent with the goal of 
establishing an assured source of supply by December 31, 2015; 
and 
(7) for steps of the rare earth material supply chain for 
which no other risk mitigation method, as described in para-
graphs (1) through (6), will ensure an assured source of supply 
by December 31, 2015, a specific plan to eliminate supply 
chain vulnerability by the earliest date practicable. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional committees described in paragraph 
(2) a report containing the findings of the assessment required 
under subsection (a) and the plan developed under subsection 
(b). 
(2) 
CONGRESSIONAL
COMMITTEES.—The 
congressional 
committees described in this paragraph are as follows: 
(A) The congressional defense committees. 
(B) The Committee on Science and Technology, the 
Committee on Financial Services, and the Committee on 
Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. 
(C) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 
the Committee on Finance, and the Committee on Banking, 
Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. 
SEC. 844. REVIEW OF NATIONAL SECURITY EXCEPTION TO COMPETI-
TION. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall review the use of the national security exception to 
full and open competition provided in section 2304(c)(6) of title 
10, United States Code, by the Department of Defense. 
(b) MATTERS REVIEWED.—The review of the use of the national 
security exception required by subsection (a) shall include— 
(1) the pattern of usage of such exception by acquisition 
organizations within the Department to determine which 
organizations are commonly using the exception and the fre-
quency of such usage; 
(2) the range of items or services being acquired through 
the use of such exception; 
(3) the process for reviewing and approving justifications 
involving such exception; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00830
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4285 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) whether the justifications for use of such exception 
typically meet the relevant requirements of the Federal Acquisi-
tion Regulation applicable to the use of such exception; 
(5) issues associated with follow-on procurements for items 
or services acquired using such exception; and 
(6) potential additional instances where such exception 
could be applied and any authorities available to the Depart-
ment other than such exception that could be applied in such 
instances. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report on the review required by subsection 
(a), including a discussion of each of the matters specified in sub-
section (b). The report shall include any recommendations relating 
to the matters reviewed that the Secretary considers appropriate. 
The report shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include 
a classified annex. 
SEC. 845. REQUIREMENT FOR ENTITIES WITH FACILITY CLEARANCES 
THAT ARE NOT UNDER FOREIGN OWNERSHIP CONTROL 
OR INFLUENCE MITIGATION. 
(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a 
plan to ensure that covered entities employ and maintain policies 
and procedures that meet requirements under the national indus-
trial security program. In developing the plan, the Secretary shall 
consider whether or not covered entities, or any category of covered 
entities, should be required to establish government security 
committees similar to those required for companies that are subject 
to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. 
(b) COVERED ENTITY.—A covered entity under this section is 
an entity— 
(1) to which the Department of Defense has granted a 
facility clearance; and 
(2) that is not subject to foreign ownership control or influ-
ence mitigation measures. 
(c) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance, 
including appropriate compliance mechanisms, to implement the 
requirement in subsection (a). To the extent determined appropriate 
by the Secretary, the guidance shall require covered entities, or 
any category of covered entities, to establish government security 
committees similar to those required for companies that are subject 
to foreign ownership control or influence mitigation measures. 
(d) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees 
on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 
a report on the plan developed pursuant to subsection (a) and 
the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (c). The report shall 
specifically address the rationale for the Secretary’s decision on 
whether or not to require covered entities, or any category of covered 
entities, to establish government security committees similar to 
those required for companies that are subject to foreign ownership 
control or influence mitigation measures. 
SEC. 846. PROCUREMENT OF PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES. 
(a) CONTRACT REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
ensure that each contract described in subsection (b) awarded by 
10 USC 2534 
note. 
Plans. 
10 USC 428 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00831
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4286 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
the Department of Defense includes a provision requiring the photo-
voltaic devices provided under the contract to comply with the 
Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.), subject to the exceptions 
to that Act provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 
U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law. 
(b) CONTRACTS DESCRIBED.—The contracts described in this 
subsection include energy savings performance contracts, utility 
service contracts, land leases, and private housing contracts, to 
the extent that such contracts result in ownership of photovoltaic 
devices by the Department of Defense. For the purposes of this 
section, the Department of Defense is deemed to own a photovoltaic 
device if the device is— 
(1) installed on Department of Defense property or in a 
facility owned by the Department of Defense; and 
(2) reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of 
Defense for the full economic life of the device. 
(c) DEFINITION
OF PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘photovoltaic devices’’ means devices that convert light 
directly into electricity through a solid-state, semiconductor process. 
SEC. 847. NON-AVAILABILITY EXCEPTION FROM BUY AMERICAN 
REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCUREMENT OF HAND OR MEAS-
URING TOOLS. 
Section 2533a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 
SEC. 848. CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT OF CONTINGENCY OPER-
ATIONS. 
(a) DEFENSE
SCIENCE
BOARD
REVIEW
OF
ORGANIZATION, 
TRAINING, AND PLANNING.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall direct 
the Defense Science Board to carry out a review of Department 
of Defense organization, doctrine, training, and planning for con-
tractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE ADDRESSED.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—The matters addressed by the review 
required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the 
following: 
(A) Department of Defense policies and procedures for 
planning for contractor logistics support of contingency 
operations. 
(B) Department organization and staffing for the 
implementation of such policies and procedures. 
(C) The development of Department doctrine for con-
tractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
(D) The training of Department military and civilian 
personnel for the planning, management, and oversight 
of contractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
(E) The extent to which the Department should rely 
upon contractor logistics support in future contingency 
operations, and the risks associated with reliance on such 
support. 
(F) Any logistics support functions for contingency 
operations for which the Department should establish or 
retain an organic capability. 
(G) The scope and level of detail on contractor logistics 
support of contingency operations that is currently included 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00832
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4287 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
in operational plans, and that should be included in oper-
ational plans. 
(H) Contracting mechanisms and contract vehicles that 
are currently used, and should be used, to provide con-
tractor logistics support of contingency operations. 
(I) Department organization and staffing for the 
management and oversight of contractor logistics support 
of contingency operations. 
(J) Actions that could be taken to improve Department 
management and oversight of contractors providing logis-
tics support of contingency operations. 
(K) The extent to which logistics support of contingency 
operations has been, and should be, provided by subcontrac-
tors, and the advantages and disadvantages of reliance 
upon subcontractors for that purpose. 
(L) The extent to which logistics support of contingency 
operations has been, and should be, provided by local 
nationals and third country nationals, and the advantages 
and disadvantages of reliance upon such sources for that 
purpose. 
(2) 
FINDINGS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.—The 
review 
required by subsection (a) shall include findings and rec-
ommendations related to— 
(A) legislative or policy guidance to address the matters 
listed in paragraph (1); and 
(B) whether and to what extent the quadrennial 
defense review (conducted pursuant to section 118 of title 
10, United States Code) or assessments by the Chairman 
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the biennial review of the 
national military strategy (conducted pursuant to section 
153(d) of such title) should be required to address require-
ments for contractor support of the Armed Forces in con-
ducting peacetime training, peacekeeping, overseas contin-
gency operations, and major combat operations, and the 
risks associated with such support. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congres-
sional defense committees a report on the results of the review 
required by subsection (a). The report shall include the findings 
and recommendations of the Defense Science Board, including such 
recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the 
Board considers appropriate, together with any comments the Sec-
retary considers appropriate. 
Subtitle F—Improve Acquisition Act 
SEC. 860. SHORT TITLE. 
This subtitle may be cited as the ‘‘Improve Acquisition Act 
of 2010’’. 
Improve 
Acquisition 
Act of 2010. 
10 USC 2545 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00833
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4288 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
PART I—DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM 
SEC. 861. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DEFENSE 
ACQUISITION SYSTEM. 
(a) MANAGEMENT OF THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM.—Part 
IV of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
chapter 148 the following new chapter: 
‘‘CHAPTER 149—DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM 
‘‘Sec. 
‘‘2545. Definitions. 
‘‘2546. Civilian management of the defense acquisition system. 
‘‘2547. Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed forces. 
‘‘2548. Performance assessments of the defense acquisition system. 
‘‘§ 2545. Definitions 
‘‘In this chapter: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘acquisition’ has the meaning provided in 
section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act 
(41 U.S.C. 403(16)). 
‘‘(2) The term ‘defense acquisition system’ means the 
workforce engaged in carrying out the acquisition of property 
and services for the Department of Defense; the management 
structure responsible for directing and overseeing the acquisi-
tion of property and services for the Department of Defense; 
and the statutory, regulatory, and policy framework that guides 
the acquisition of property and services for the Department 
of Defense. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘element of the defense acquisition system’ 
means an organization that employs members of the acquisition 
workforce, carries out acquisition functions, and focuses pri-
marily on acquisition. 
‘‘(4) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ has the meaning pro-
vided in section 101(a)(18) of this title. 
‘‘§ 2546. Civilian management of the defense acquisition 
system 
‘‘(a) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 
FOR ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY, AND LOGISTICS.—Subject to the 
authority, direction and control of the Secretary of Defense, the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logis-
tics shall be responsible for the management of the defense acquisi-
tion system and shall exercise such control of the system and 
perform such duties as are necessary to ensure the successful 
and efficient operation of the defense acquisition system, including 
the duties enumerated and assigned to the Under Secretary else-
where in this title. 
‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITY
OF
THE SERVICE ACQUISITION EXECU-
TIVES.—Subject to the direction of the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on matters pertaining 
to acquisition, and subject to the authority, direction, and control 
of the Secretary of the military department concerned, a service 
acquisition executive of a military department shall be responsible 
for the management of elements of the defense acquisition system 
in that military department and shall exercise such control of 
the system and perform such duties as are necessary to ensure 
10 USC 2545. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00834
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4289 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
the successful and efficient operation of such elements of the defense 
acquisition system. 
‘‘§ 2547. Acquisition-related functions of chiefs of the armed 
forces 
‘‘(a) PERFORMANCE
OF CERTAIN ACQUISITION-RELATED FUNC-
TIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of 
Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of 
Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps 
assist the Secretary of the military department concerned in the 
performance of the following acquisition-related functions of such 
department: 
‘‘(1) The development of requirements relating to the 
defense acquisition system (subject, where appropriate, to 
validation by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council pursu-
ant to section 181 of this title). 
‘‘(2) The coordination of measures to control requirements 
creep in the defense acquisition system. 
‘‘(3) The development of career paths in acquisition for 
military personnel (as required by section 1722a of this title). 
‘‘(4) The assignment and training of contracting officer 
representatives when such representatives are required to be 
members of the armed forces because of the nature of the 
contract concerned. 
‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 
be construed to affect the assignment of functions under section 
3014(c)(1)(A), section 5014(c)(1)(A), or section 8014(c)(1)(A) of this 
title, except as explicitly provided in this section. 
‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘requirements creep’ means the addition of 
new technical or operational specifications after a requirements 
document is approved by the appropriate validation authority 
for the requirements document. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘requirements document’ means a document 
produced in the requirements process that is provided for an 
acquisition program to guide the subsequent development, 
production, and testing of the program and that— 
‘‘(A) justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an 
approach that is a combination of materiel and non-mate-
riel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps; 
‘‘(B) details the information necessary to develop an 
increment of militarily useful, logistically supportable, and 
technically mature capability, including key performance 
parameters; or 
‘‘(C) identifies production attributes required for a 
single increment of a program. 
‘‘§ 2548. Performance assessments of the defense acquisition 
system 
‘‘(a) PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED.—Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, the Secretary of 
Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion, Technology, and Logistics, the Director of Procurement and 
Acquisition Policy, and the Director of the Office of Performance 
Assessment and Root Cause Analysis, shall issue guidance, with 
detailed implementation instructions, for the Department of Defense 
Deadline. 
Guidance. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00835
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4290 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to provide for periodic independent performance assessments of 
elements of the defense acquisition system for the purpose of— 
‘‘(1) determining the extent to which such elements of the 
defense acquisition system deliver value to the Department 
of Defense, taking into consideration the performance elements 
identified in subsection (b); 
‘‘(2) assisting senior officials of the Department of Defense 
in identifying and developing lessons learned from best prac-
tices and shortcomings in the performance of such elements 
of the defense acquisition system; and 
‘‘(3) assisting senior officials of the Department of Defense 
in developing acquisition workforce excellence under section 
1701a of this title 
‘‘(b) AREAS CONSIDERED IN PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.—(1) 
Each performance assessment conducted pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall consider, at a minimum— 
‘‘(A) the extent to which acquisitions conducted by the 
element of the defense acquisition system under review meet 
applicable cost, schedule, and performance objectives; and 
‘‘(B) the staffing and quality of the acquisition workforce 
and the effectiveness of the management of the acquisition 
workforce, including workforce incentives and career paths. 
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the performance 
assessments required by this section are appropriately tailored to 
reflect the diverse nature of the work performed by each element 
of the defense acquisition system. In addition to the mandatory 
areas under paragraph (1), a performance assessment may consider, 
as appropriate, specific areas of acquisition concern, such as— 
‘‘(A) the selection of contractors, including— 
‘‘(i) the extent of competition and the use of exceptions 
to competition requirements; 
‘‘(ii) compliance with Department of Defense policies 
regarding the participation of small business concerns and 
various categories of small business concerns, including 
the use of contract bundling and the availability of non- 
bundled contract vehicles; 
‘‘(iii) the quality of market research; 
‘‘(iv) the effective consideration of contractor past 
performance; and 
‘‘(v) the number of bid protests, the extent to which 
such bid protests have been successful, and the reasons 
for such success; 
‘‘(B) the negotiation of contracts, including— 
‘‘(i) the appropriate application of section 2306a of this 
title (relating to truth in negotiations); 
‘‘(ii) the appropriate use of contract types appropriate 
to specific procurements; 
‘‘(iii) the appropriate use of performance requirements; 
‘‘(iv) the appropriate acquisition of technical data and 
other rights and assets necessary to support long-term 
sustainment and follow-on procurement; and 
‘‘(v) the timely definitization of any undefinitized con-
tract actions; and 
‘‘(C) 
the 
management 
of 
contractor 
performance, 
including— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00836
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4291 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(i) the assignment of appropriately qualified con-
tracting officer representatives and other contract manage-
ment personnel; 
‘‘(ii) the extent of contract disputes, the reasons for 
such disputes, and the extent to which they have been 
successfully addressed; 
‘‘(iii) the appropriate consideration of long-term 
sustainment and energy efficiency objectives; and 
‘‘(iv) the appropriate use of integrated testing. 
‘‘(c) CONTENTS OF GUIDANCE.—The guidance issued pursuant 
to subsection (a) shall ensure that each element of the defense 
acquisition system is subject to a performance assessment under 
this section not less often than once every four years, and shall 
address, at a minimum— 
‘‘(1) the designation of elements of the defense acquisition 
system that are subject to performance assessment at an 
organizational level that ensures such assessments can be per-
formed in an efficient and integrated manner; 
‘‘(2) the frequency with which such performance assess-
ments should be conducted; 
‘‘(3) goals, standards, tools, and metrics for use in con-
ducting performance assessments; 
‘‘(4) the composition of the teams designated to perform 
performance assessments; 
‘‘(5) any phase-in requirements needed to ensure that quali-
fied staff are available to perform performance assessments; 
‘‘(6) procedures for tracking the implementation of rec-
ommendations made pursuant to performance assessments; 
‘‘(7) procedures for developing and disseminating lessons 
learned from performance assessments; and 
‘‘(8) procedures for ensuring that information from perform-
ance assessments are retained electronically and are provided 
in a timely manner to the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Director of the 
Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis 
as needed to assist them in performing their responsibilities 
under this section. 
‘‘(d) PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE 
RESULTS ACT OF 1993.—Beginning with fiscal year 2012, the annual 
performance plan prepared by the Department of Defense pursuant 
to section 1115 of title 31 shall include appropriate performance 
goals for elements of the defense acquisition system. 
‘‘(e) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Beginning with fiscal year 
2012— 
‘‘(1) the annual report prepared by the Secretary of Defense 
pursuant to section 1116 of title 31, United States Code, shall 
address the Department’s success in achieving performance 
goals established pursuant to such section for elements of the 
defense acquisition system; and 
‘‘(2) the annual report prepared by the Director of the 
Office of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis 
pursuant to section 103(f) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition 
Reform Act of 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2430 note), shall include informa-
tion on the activities undertaken by the Department pursuant 
to such section, including a summary of significant findings 
or recommendations arising out of performance assessments.’’. 
Effective date. 
Effective date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00837
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4292 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of chapters at the begin-
ning of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, and at the 
beginning of part IV of such subtitle, are each amended by inserting 
after the item relating to chapter 148 the following new item: 
‘‘149. Defense Acquisition System ................................................................... 2545’’. 
SEC. 862. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON JOINT CAPABILITIES 
INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the Joint Capabili-
ties Integration and Development System (in this section referred 
to as ‘‘JCIDS’’). Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on the review and 
include in such report any recommendations the Comptroller Gen-
eral considers necessary and advisable to improve or replace JCIDS. 
(b) CONTENT OF THE REVIEW.— 
(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the review required by sub-
section (a) is to evaluate the effectiveness of JCIDS in achieving 
the following objectives: 
(A) 
Timeliness 
in 
delivering 
capability 
to 
the 
warfighter. 
(B) Efficient use of the investment resources of the 
Department of Defense. 
(C) Control of requirements creep. 
(D) Responsiveness to changes occurring after the 
approval of a requirements document (including changes 
to the threat environment, the emergence of new capabili-
ties, or changes in the resources estimated to procure or 
sustain a capability). 
(E) Development of the personnel skills, capacity, and 
training needed for an effective and efficient requirements 
process. 
(2) MATTERS CONSIDERED.—In performing the review, the 
Comptroller General shall gather information on and consider 
the following matters: 
(A) The time that requirements documents take to 
receive approval through JCIDS. 
(B) The quality of cost information considered in JCIDS 
and the extent of its consideration. 
(C) The extent to which JCIDS establishes a meaning-
ful level of priority for requirements. 
(D) The extent to which JCIDS is considering trade- 
offs between cost, schedule, and performance objectives. 
(E) The quality of information on sustainment consid-
ered in JCIDS and the extent to which sustainment 
information is considered. 
(F) An evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages 
of designating a commander of a unified combatant com-
mand for each requirements document for which the Joint 
Requirements Oversight Council is the validation authority 
to provide a joint evaluation task force to participate in 
a materiel solution and to— 
(i) provide input to the analysis of alternatives; 
(ii) participate in testing (including limited user 
tests and prototype testing); 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00838
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4293 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(iii) provide input on a concept of operations and 
doctrine; 
(iv) provide end user feedback to the resource 
sponsor; and 
(v) participate, through the combatant commander 
concerned, in any alteration of the requirement for 
such solution. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) JOINT
CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION
AND
DEVELOPMENT 
SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘Joint Capabilities Integration and Develop-
ment System’’ means the system for the assessment, review, 
validation, and approval of joint warfighting requirements that 
is described in Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 
3170.01G 
(2) REQUIREMENTS
DOCUMENT.—The term ‘‘requirements 
document’’ means a document produced in JCIDS that is pro-
vided for an acquisition program to guide the subsequent 
development, production, and testing of the program and that— 
(A) justifies the need for a materiel approach, or an 
approach that is a combination of materiel and non-mate-
riel, to satisfy one or more specific capability gaps; 
(B) details the information necessary to develop an 
increment of militarily useful, logistically supportable, and 
technically mature capability, including key performance 
parameters; or 
(C) identifies production attributes required for a single 
increment of a program. 
(3) REQUIREMENTS CREEP.—The term ‘‘requirements creep’’ 
means the addition of new technical or operational specifica-
tions after a requirements document is approved. 
(4) MATERIEL
SOLUTION.—The term ‘‘materiel solution’’ 
means the development, acquisition, procurement, or fielding 
of a new item, or of a modification to an existing item, necessary 
to equip, operate, maintain, and support military activities. 
SEC. 863. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SERVICES. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT
OF REQUIREMENTS PROCESSES
FOR
THE 
ACQUISITION OF SERVICES.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
that the military departments and Defense Agencies each establish 
a process for identifying, assessing, reviewing, and validating 
requirements for the acquisition of services. 
(b) OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS.—With regard to requirements 
for the acquisition of services in support of combatant commands 
and military operations, the Secretary shall ensure— 
(1) that the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval 
Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Com-
mandant of the Marine Corps implement and bear chief respon-
sibility for carrying out, within the Armed Force concerned, 
the process established pursuant to subsection (a) for such 
Armed Force; and 
(2) that commanders of unified combatant commands and 
other officers identified or designated as joint qualified officers 
have an opportunity to participate in the process of each mili-
tary department to provide input on joint requirements for 
the acquisition of services. 
(c) SUPPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—With regard to requirements 
for the acquisition of services not covered by subsection (b), the 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00839
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4294 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Secretary shall ensure that the secretaries of the military depart-
ments and the heads of the Defense Agencies implement and bear 
chief responsibility for carrying out, within the military department 
or Defense Agency concerned, the process established pursuant 
to subsection (a) for such military department or Defense Agency. 
(d) IMPLEMENTATION PLANS REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall 
ensure that an implementation plan is developed for each process 
established pursuant to subsection (a) that addresses, at a min-
imum, the following: 
(1) The organization of such process. 
(2) The level of command responsibility required for identi-
fying, assessing, reviewing, and validating requirements for 
the acquisition of services in accordance with the requirements 
of this section and the categories established under section 
2330(a)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code. 
(3) The composition of positions necessary to operate such 
process. 
(4) The training required for personnel engaged in such 
process. 
(5) The relationship between doctrine and such process. 
(6) Methods of obtaining input on joint requirements for 
the acquisition of services. 
(7) Procedures for coordinating with the acquisition process. 
(8) Considerations relating to opportunities for strategic 
sourcing. 
(e) MATTERS REQUIRED IN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Each plan 
required under subsection (d) shall provide for initial implementa-
tion of a process for identifying, assessing, reviewing, and validating 
requirements for the acquisition of services not later than one 
year after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall provide 
for full implementation of such process at the earliest date prac-
ticable. 
(f) CONSISTENCY WITH JOINT GUIDANCE.—Whenever, at any 
time, guidance is issued by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 
Staff relating to requirements for the acquisition of services in 
support of combatant commands and military operations, each 
process established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be revised in 
accordance with such joint guidance. 
(g) DEFINITION.—The term ‘‘requirements for the acquisition 
of services’’ means objectives to be achieved through acquisitions 
primarily involving the procurement of services. 
(h) REVIEW
OF
SUPPORTING
REQUIREMENTS
TO
IDENTIFY 
SAVINGS.—The secretaries of the military departments and the 
heads of the Defense Agencies shall review and validate each 
requirement described in subsection (c) with an anticipated cost 
in excess of $10,000,000 with the objective of identifying unneeded 
or low priority requirements that can be reduced or eliminated, 
with the savings transferred to higher priority objectives. Savings 
identified and transferred to higher priority objectives through 
review and revalidation under this subsection shall count toward 
the savings objectives established in the June 4, 2010, guidance 
of the Secretary of Defense on improved operational efficiencies 
and the annual reduction in funding for service support contractors 
required by the August 16, 2010, guidance of the Secretary of 
Defense on efficiency initiatives. As provided by the Secretary, 
cost avoidance shall not count toward these objectives. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
10 USC 2330 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00840
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4295 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(i) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (e) of section 834 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 
and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking ‘‘September 
30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 
SEC. 864. REVIEW OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION GUIDANCE. 
(a) REVIEW
OF GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
review the acquisition guidance of the Department of Defense, 
including, at a minimum, the guidance contained in Department 
of Defense Instruction 5000.02 entitled ‘‘Operation of the Defense 
Acquisition System’’. 
(b) MATTERS CONSIDERED.—The review performed under sub-
section (a) shall consider— 
(1) the extent to which the acquisition of commercial goods 
and commodities, commercial and military unique services, and 
information technology should be addressed in Department of 
Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other guidance primarily 
relating to the acquisition of weapon systems, or should be 
addressed in separate instructions and guidance; 
(2) whether long-term sustainment and energy efficiency 
of weapon systems is appropriately emphasized; 
(3) whether appropriate mechanisms exist to communicate 
information relating to the mission needs of the Department 
of Defense to the industrial base in a way that allows the 
industrial base to make appropriate investments in infrastruc-
ture, capacity, and technology development to help meet such 
needs; 
(4) the extent to which earned value management should 
be required on acquisitions not involving the acquisition of 
weapon systems and whether measures of quality and technical 
performance should be included in any earned value manage-
ment system; and 
(5) such other matters as the Secretary considers appro-
priate. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report detailing any changes in the acquisition 
guidance of the Department of Defense identified during the review 
required by subsection (a), and any actions taken, or planned to 
be taken, to implement such changes. 
SEC. 865. REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW REFERENCES TO SERVICES 
ACQUISITION THROUGHOUT THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION 
REGULATION AND THE DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION 
REGULATION SUPPLEMENT. 
(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in consulta-
tion with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy and 
the heads of such other Federal agencies as the Secretary considers 
appropriate, shall review the Federal Acquisition Regulation and 
the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to ensure 
that such regulations include appropriate guidance for and ref-
erences to services acquisition that are in addition to references 
provided in part 37 and the Defense Supplement to part 37. 
(b) MATTERS CONSIDERED.—The review required by subsection 
(a) shall consider the extent to which additional guidance is 
needed— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00841
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4296 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) to provide the tools and processes needed to assist 
contracting officials in addressing the full range of complexities 
that can arise in the acquisition of services; and 
(2) to enhance and support the procurement and project 
management community in all aspects of the process for the 
acquisition of services, including requirements development, 
assessment of reasonableness, and post-award management and 
oversight. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report containing— 
(1) a summary of the findings of the review required by 
subsection (a); and 
(2) any recommendations that the Secretary may have 
for changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the 
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement to address 
such findings, including identifying any changes that are nec-
essary to improve part 37 (which specifically addresses services 
acquisitions). 
SEC. 866. PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF MILITARY PURPOSE 
NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS. 
(a) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out 
a pilot program to assess the feasability and advisability of 
acquiring military purpose nondevelopmental items in accord-
ance with this section. 
(2) SCOPE OF PROGRAM.—Under the pilot program, the Sec-
retary may enter into contracts with nontraditional defense 
contractors for the acquisition of military purpose nondevelop-
mental items in accordance with the requirements set forth 
in subsection (b). 
(b) CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS.—Each contract entered into 
under the pilot program— 
(1) shall be a firm, fixed price contract, or a firm, fixed 
price contract with an economic price adjustment clause 
awarded using competitive procedures in accordance with 
chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code; 
(2) shall be in an amount not in excess of $50,000,000, 
including all options; 
(3) shall provide— 
(A) for the delivery of an initial lot of production quan-
tities of completed items not later than nine months after 
the date of the award of such contract; and 
(B) that failure to make delivery as provided for under 
subparagraph (A) may result in the termination of such 
contract for default; and 
(4) shall be— 
(A) exempt from the requirement to submit certified 
cost or pricing data under section 2306a of title 10, United 
States Code, and the cost accounting standards under sec-
tion 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act 
(41 U.S.C. 422); and 
(B) subject to the requirement to provide data other 
than certified cost or pricing data for the purpose of price 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00842
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4297 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
reasonableness determinations, as provided in section 
2306a(d) of title 10, United States Code. 
(c) REGULATIONS.—If the Secretary establishes the pilot pro-
gram authorized under subsection (a), the Secretary shall prescribe 
regulations governing such pilot program. Such regulations shall 
be included in regulations of the Department of Defense prescribed 
as part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and shall include 
the contract clauses and procedures necessary to implement such 
program. 
(d) REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORTS ON PROGRAM ACTIVITIES.—Not later than 60 
days after the end of any fiscal year in which the pilot program 
is in effect, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the pilot program. The report 
shall be in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. 
Each report shall include, for each contract entered into under 
the pilot program in the preceding fiscal year, the following: 
(A) The contractor. 
(B) The item or items to be acquired. 
(C) The military purpose to be served by such item 
or items. 
(D) The amount of the contract. 
(E) The actions taken by the Department of Defense 
to ensure that the price paid for such item or items is 
fair and reasonable. 
(2) PROGRAM ASSESSMENT.—If the Secretary establishes the 
pilot program authorized under subsection (a), not later than 
four years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report setting forth the 
assessment of the Comptroller General of the extent to which 
the pilot program— 
(A) enabled the Department to acquire items that 
otherwise might not have been available to the Depart-
ment; 
(B) assisted the Department in the rapid acquisition 
and fielding of capabilities needed to meet urgent oper-
ational needs; and 
(C) protected the interests of the United States in 
paying fair and reasonable prices for the item or items 
acquired. 
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘military purpose nondevelopmental item’’ 
means a nondevelopmental item that meets a validated military 
requirement, as determined in writing by the responsible pro-
gram manager, and has been developed exclusively at private 
expense. For purposes of this paragraph, an item shall not 
be considered to be developed exclusively at private expense 
if development of the item was paid for in whole or in part 
through— 
(A) independent research and development costs or 
bid and proposal costs that have been reimbursed directly 
or indirectly by a Federal agency or have been submitted 
to a Federal agency for reimbursement; or 
(B) foreign government funding. 
(2) The term ‘‘nondevelopmental item’’— 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00843
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4298 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) has the meaning given that term in section 4(13) 
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
403(13)); and 
(B) also includes previously developed items of supply 
that require modifications other than those customarily 
available in the commercial marketplace if such modifica-
tions are consistent with the requirement in subsection 
(b)(3)(A). 
(3) The term ‘‘nontraditional defense contractor’’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 2302(9) of title 10, United 
States Code (as added by subsection (g)). 
(4) The terms ‘‘independent research and developments 
costs’’ and ‘‘bid and proposal costs’’ have the meaning given 
such terms in section 31.205–18 of the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation. 
(f) SUNSET.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority to carry out the pilot pro-
gram shall expire on the date that is five years after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. 
(2) CONTINUATION OF CURRENT CONTRACTS.—The expiration 
under paragraph (1) of the authority to carry out the pilot 
program shall not affect the validity of any contract awarded 
under the pilot program before the date of the expiration of 
the pilot program under that paragraph. 
(g) STATUTORY DEFINITION OF NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CON-
TRACTOR.— 
(1) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTOR.—Section 2302 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
‘‘(9) The term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’, with 
respect to a procurement or with respect to a transaction 
authorized under section 2371(a) of this title, means an entity 
that is not currently performing and has not performed, for 
at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources 
by the Department of Defense for the procurement or trans-
action, any of the following for the Department of Defense: 
‘‘(A) Any contract or subcontract that is subject to 
full coverage under the cost accounting standards pre-
scribed pursuant to section 26 of the Office of Federal 
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422) and the regulations 
implementing such section. 
‘‘(B) Any other contract in excess of $500,000 under 
which the contractor is required to submit certified cost 
or pricing data under section 2306a of this title.’’. 
(2) CONFORMING
AMENDMENT.—Section 845(f) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (10 
U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(f) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTOR DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’ has the 
meaning provided by section 2302(9) of title 10, United States 
Code.’’. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00844
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4299 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
PART II—DEFENSE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE 
SEC. 871. ACQUISITION WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE. 
(a) ACQUISITION WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE.—Subchapter I of 
chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after section 1701 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 1701a. Management for acquisition workforce excellence 
‘‘(a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this chapter is to require the 
Department of Defense to develop and manage a highly skilled 
professional acquisition workforce— 
‘‘(1) in which excellence and contribution to mission is 
rewarded; 
‘‘(2) which has the technical expertise and business skills 
to ensure the Department receives the best value for the 
expenditure of public resources; 
‘‘(3) which serves as a model for performance management 
of employees of the Department; and 
‘‘(4) which is managed in a manner that complements and 
reinforces the management of the defense acquisition system 
pursuant to chapter 149 of this title. 
‘‘(b) PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT.—In order to achieve the pur-
pose set forth in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— 
‘‘(1) use the full authorities provided in subsections (a) 
through (d) of section 9902 of title 5, including flexibilities 
related to performance management and hiring and to training 
of managers; 
‘‘(2) require managers to develop performance plans for 
individual members of the acquisition workforce in order to 
give members an understanding of how their performance 
contributes to their organization’s mission and the success of 
the defense acquisition system (as defined in section 2545 of 
this title); 
‘‘(3) to the extent appropriate, use the lessons learned 
from the acquisition demonstration project carried out under 
section 1762 of this title related to contribution-based com-
pensation and appraisal, and how those lessons may be applied 
within the General Schedule system; 
‘‘(4) develop attractive career paths; 
‘‘(5) encourage continuing education and training; 
‘‘(6) develop appropriate procedures for warnings during 
performance evaluations for members of the acquisition 
workforce who consistently fail to meet performance standards; 
‘‘(7) take full advantage of the Defense Civilian Leadership 
Program established under section 1112 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 
123 Stat. 2496; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.); 
‘‘(8) use the authorities for highly qualified experts under 
section 9903 of title 5, to hire experts who are skilled acquisition 
professionals to— 
‘‘(A) serve in leadership positions within the acquisition 
workforce to strengthen management and oversight; 
‘‘(B) provide mentors to advise individuals within the 
acquisition workforce on their career paths and opportuni-
ties to advance and excel within the acquisition workforce; 
and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00845
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4300 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) assist with the design of education and training 
courses and the training of individuals in the acquisition 
workforce; and 
‘‘(9) use the authorities for expedited security clearance 
processing pursuant to section 1564 of this title. 
‘‘(c) NEGOTIATIONS.—Any action taken by the Secretary under 
this section, or to implement this section, shall be subject to the 
requirements of chapter 71 of title 5. 
‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—Any rules or regulations prescribed pursu-
ant to this section shall be deemed an agency rule or regulation 
under section 7117(a)(2) of title 5, and shall not be deemed a 
Government-wide rule or regulation under section 7117(a)(1) of 
such title.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 1701 the following new item: 
‘‘1701a. Management for acquisition workforce excellence.’’. 
SEC. 872. AMENDMENTS TO THE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEM-
ONSTRATION PROJECT. 
(a) CODIFICATION INTO TITLE 10.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 87 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1761 the following 
new section: 
‘‘§ 1762. Demonstration project relating to certain acquisition 
personnel management policies and procedures 
‘‘(a) COMMENCEMENT.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized 
to carry out a demonstration project, the purpose of which is to 
determine the feasibility or desirability of one or more proposals 
for improving the personnel management policies or procedures 
that apply with respect to the acquisition workforce of the Depart-
ment of Defense and supporting personnel assigned to work directly 
with the acquisition workforce. 
‘‘(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—(1) Except as otherwise provided 
in this subsection, any demonstration project described in subsection 
(a) shall be subject to section 4703 of title 5 and all other provisions 
of such title that apply with respect to any demonstration project 
under such section. 
‘‘(2) Subject to paragraph (3), in applying section 4703 of title 
5 with respect to a demonstration project described in subsection 
(a)— 
‘‘(A) ‘180 days’ in subsection (b)(4) of such section shall 
be deemed to read ‘120 days’; 
‘‘(B) ‘90 days’ in subsection (b)(6) of such section shall 
be deemed to read ‘30 days’; and 
‘‘(C) subsection (d)(1) of such section shall be disregarded. 
‘‘(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply with respect to a demonstra-
tion project unless— 
‘‘(A) for each organization or team participating in the 
demonstration project— 
‘‘(i) at least one-third of the workforce participating 
in the demonstration project consists of members of the 
acquisition workforce; and 
‘‘(ii) at least two-thirds of the workforce participating 
in the demonstration project consists of members of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00846
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4301 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
acquisition workforce and supporting personnel assigned 
to work directly with the acquisition workforce; and 
‘‘(B) the demonstration project commences before October 
1, 2007. 
‘‘(c) LIMITATION
ON
NUMBER
OF
PARTICIPANTS.—The total 
number of persons who may participate in the demonstration project 
under this section may not exceed 120,000. 
‘‘(d) EFFECT OF REORGANIZATIONS.—The applicability of para-
graph (2) of subsection (b) to an organization or team shall not 
terminate by reason that the organization or team, after having 
satisfied the conditions in paragraph (3) of such subsection when 
it began to participate in a demonstration project under this section, 
ceases to meet one or both of the conditions set forth in subpara-
graph (A) of such paragraph (3) as a result of a reorganization, 
restructuring, realignment, consolidation, or other organizational 
change. 
‘‘(e) ASSESSMENTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall designate 
an independent organization to conduct two assessments of the 
acquisition workforce demonstration project described in subsection 
(a). 
‘‘(2) Each such assessment shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) A description of the workforce included in the project. 
‘‘(B) An explanation of the flexibilities used in the project 
to appoint individuals to the acquisition workforce and whether 
those appointments are based on competitive procedures and 
recognize veteran’s preferences. 
‘‘(C) An explanation of the flexibilities used in the project 
to develop a performance appraisal system that recognizes 
excellence in performance and offers opportunities for improve-
ment. 
‘‘(D) The steps taken to ensure that such system is fair 
and transparent for all employees in the project. 
‘‘(E) How the project allows the organization to better meet 
mission needs. 
‘‘(F) An analysis of how the flexibilities in subparagraphs 
(B) and (C) are used, and what barriers have been encountered 
that inhibit their use. 
‘‘(G) Whether there is a process for— 
‘‘(i) ensuring ongoing performance feedback and dia-
logue among supervisors, managers, and employees 
throughout the performance appraisal period; and 
‘‘(ii) setting timetables for performance appraisals. 
‘‘(H) The project’s impact on career progression. 
‘‘(I) The project’s appropriateness or inappropriateness in 
light of the complexities of the workforce affected. 
‘‘(J) The project’s sufficiency in terms of providing protec-
tions for diversity in promotion and retention of personnel. 
‘‘(K) The adequacy of the training, policy guidelines, and 
other preparations afforded in connection with using the project. 
‘‘(L) Whether there is a process for ensuring employee 
involvement in the development and improvement of the 
project. 
‘‘(3) The first assessment under this subsection shall be com-
pleted not later than September 30, 2012. The second and final 
assessment shall be completed not later than September 30, 2016. 
The Secretary shall submit to the covered congressional committees 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00847
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4302 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
a copy of each assessment within 30 days after receipt by the 
Secretary of the assessment. 
‘‘(f) COVERED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, 
the term ‘covered congressional committees’ means— 
‘‘(1) the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives; 
‘‘(2) the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern-
mental Affairs of the Senate; and 
‘‘(3) the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 
of the House of Representatives. 
‘‘(g) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to conduct 
a demonstration program under this section shall terminate on 
September 30, 2017. 
‘‘(h) CONVERSION.—Within 6 months after the authority to con-
duct a demonstration project under this section is terminated as 
provided in subsection (g), employees in the project shall convert 
to the civilian personnel system created pursuant to section 9902 
of title 5.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of subchapter V of chapter 87 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to section 1761 the following new item: 
‘‘1762. Demonstration project relating to certain acquisition personnel management 
policies and procedures.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 4308 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 10 
U.S.C. 1701 note) is repealed. 
SEC. 873. CAREER DEVELOPMENT FOR CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PER-
SONNEL IN THE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE. 
(a) CAREER PATHS.— 
(1) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 87 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1722a the following 
new section: 
‘‘§ 1722b. Special requirements for civilian employees in the 
acquisition field 
‘‘(a) REQUIREMENT
FOR POLICY
AND GUIDANCE REGARDING 
CIVILIAN PERSONNEL IN ACQUISITION.—The Secretary of Defense, 
acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics, shall establish policies and issue guid-
ance to ensure the proper development, assignment, and employ-
ment of civilian members of the acquisition workforce to achieve 
the objectives specified in subsection (b). 
‘‘(b) OBJECTIVES.—Policies established and guidance issued 
pursuant to subsection (a) shall ensure, at a minimum, the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(1) A career path in the acquisition field that attracts 
the highest quality civilian personnel, from either within or 
outside the Federal Government. 
‘‘(2) A deliberate workforce development strategy that 
increases attainment of key experiences that contribute to a 
highly qualified acquisition workforce. 
‘‘(3) Sufficient opportunities for promotion and advance-
ment in the acquisition field. 
‘‘(4) A sufficient number of qualified, trained members 
eligible for and active in the acquisition field to ensure adequate 
Deadline. 
Definition. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00848
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4303 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
capacity, capability, and effective succession for acquisition 
functions, including contingency contracting, of the Department 
of Defense. 
‘‘(5) A deliberate workforce development strategy that 
ensures diversity in promotion, advancement, and experiential 
opportunities commensurate with the general workforce out-
lined in this section. 
‘‘(c) INCLUSION OF INFORMATION IN ANNUAL REPORT.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall include in the report to Congress required 
under section 115b(d) of this title the following information related 
to the acquisition workforce for the period covered by the report 
(which shall be shown for the Department of Defense as a whole 
and separately for the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, 
Defense Agencies, and Office of the Secretary of Defense): 
‘‘(1) The total number of persons serving in the Acquisition 
Corps, set forth separately for members of the armed forces 
and civilian employees, by grade level and by functional spe-
cialty. 
‘‘(2) The total number of critical acquisition positions held, 
set forth separately for members of the armed forces and 
civilian employees, by grade level and by other appropriate 
categories (including by program manager, deputy program 
manager, and division head positions), including average length 
of time served in each position. For each such category, the 
report shall specify the number of civilians holding such posi-
tions compared to the total number of positions filled. 
‘‘(3) The number of employees to whom the requirements 
of subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) of section 1732 of this 
title did not apply because of the exceptions provided in para-
graphs (1) and (2) of section 1732(c) of this title, set forth 
separately by type of exception. 
‘‘(4) The number of times a waiver authority was exercised 
under section 1724(d), 1732(d), 1734(d), or 1736(c) of this title 
or any other provision of this chapter (or other provision of 
law) which permits the waiver of any requirement relating 
to the acquisition workforce, and in the case of each such 
authority, the reasons for exercising the authority. The Sec-
retary may present the information provided under this para-
graph by category or grouping of types of waivers and reasons.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of subchapter II of chapter 87 of such title is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 1722a the fol-
lowing new item: 
‘‘1722b. Special requirements for civilian employees in the acquisition field.’’. 
(b) CAREER EDUCATION AND TRAINING.—Section 1723 of such 
title is amended by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c) 
and inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: 
‘‘(b) CAREER PATH REQUIREMENTS.—For each career path, the 
Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish require-
ments for the completion of course work and related on-the-job 
training and demonstration of qualifications in the critical acquisi-
tion-related duties and tasks of the career path. The Secretary 
of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary, shall also— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00849
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4304 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(1) encourage individuals in the acquisition workforce to 
maintain the currency of their acquisition knowledge and gen-
erally enhance their knowledge of related acquisition manage-
ment disciplines through academic programs and other self- 
developmental activities; and 
‘‘(2) develop key work experiences, including the creation 
of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense that 
facilitates the periodic interaction between individuals in the 
acquisition workforce and the end user in such end user’s 
environment to enhance the knowledge base of such workforce, 
for individuals in the acquisition workforce so that the individ-
uals may gain in-depth knowledge and experience in the 
acquisition process and become seasoned, well-qualified mem-
bers of the acquisition workforce.’’. 
SEC. 874. RECERTIFICATION AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS. 
(a) CONTINUING EDUCATION.—Section 1723 of title 10, United 
States Code, as amended by section 873, is further amended by 
amending subsection (a) to read as follows: 
‘‘(a) QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS.—(1) The Secretary of 
Defense shall establish education, training, and experience require-
ments for each acquisition position, based on the level of complexity 
of duties carried out in the position. In establishing such require-
ments, the Secretary shall ensure the availability and sufficiency 
of training in all areas of acquisition, including additional training 
courses with an emphasis on services contracting, market research 
strategies (including assessments of local contracting capabilities), 
long-term sustainment strategies, information technology, and rapid 
acquisition. 
‘‘(2) In establishing such requirements for positions other than 
critical acquisition positions designated pursuant to section 1733 
of this title, the Secretary may state the requirements by categories 
of positions. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall 
establish requirements for continuing education and periodic 
renewal of an individual’s certification. Any requirement for a cer-
tification renewal shall not require a renewal more often than 
once every five years.’’. 
(b) STANDARDS FOR TRAINING.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of Chapter 87 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section: 
‘‘§ 1748. Fulfillment standards for acquisition workforce 
training 
‘‘The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary 
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall develop 
fulfillment standards, and implement and maintain a program, 
for purposes of the training requirements of sections 1723, 1724, 
and 1735 of this title. Such fulfillment standards shall consist 
of criteria for determining whether an individual has demonstrated 
competence in the areas that would be taught in the training 
courses required under those sections. If an individual meets the 
appropriate fulfillment standard, the applicable training require-
ment is fulfilled.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00850
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4305 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item: 
‘‘1748. Fulfillment standards for acquisition workforce training.’’. 
(3) DEADLINE FOR FULFILLMENT STANDARDS.—The fulfill-
ment standards required under section 1748 of title 10, United 
States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be developed 
not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act. 
(4) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 853 of Public Law 105– 
85 (111 Stat. 1851) is repealed. 
SEC. 875. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION WORKFORCE. 
(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop 
and carry out a plan to strengthen the part of the acquisition 
workforce that specializes in information technology. The plan shall 
include the following: 
(1) Defined targets for billets devoted to information tech-
nology acquisition. 
(2) Specific certification requirements for individuals in 
the acquisition workforce who specialize in information tech-
nology acquisition. 
(3) Defined career paths for individuals in the acquisition 
workforce who specialize in information technology acquisitions. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘information technology’’ has the meaning 
provided such term in section 11101 of title 40, United States 
Code, and includes information technology incorporated into 
a major weapon system. 
(2) The term ‘‘major weapon system’’ has the meaning 
provided such term in section 2379(f) of title 10, United States 
Code. 
(c) DEADLINE.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop the plan 
required under this section not later than 270 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 876. DEFINITION OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE. 
Section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting after paragraph (17) the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(18) The term ‘acquisition workforce’ means the persons 
serving in acquisition positions within the Department of 
Defense, as designated pursuant to section 1721(a) of this title.’’. 
SEC. 877. DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY CURRICULUM REVIEW. 
(a) CURRICULUM REVIEW.—Not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall lead a review of 
the curriculum offered by the Defense Acquisition University to 
ensure it adequately supports the training and education require-
ments of acquisition professionals, particularly in service con-
tracting, long term sustainment strategies, information technology, 
and rapid acquisition. The review shall also involve the service 
acquisition executives of each military department. 
(b) ANALYSIS OF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAINING.—Fol-
lowing the review conducted under subsection (a), the Secretary 
of Defense shall analyze the most recent future-years defense pro-
gram to determine the amounts of estimated expenditures and 
Deadline. 
10 USC 1723 
note. 
10 USC 1723 
note. 
10 USC 1748 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00851
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4306 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
proposed appropriations necessary to support the training require-
ments of the amendments made by section 874, including any 
new training requirements determined after the review conducted 
under subsection (a). The Secretary shall identify any additional 
funding needed for such training requirements in the separate 
chapter on the defense acquisition workforce required in the next 
annual strategic workforce plan under 115b of title 10, United 
States Code. 
(c) REQUIREMENT
FOR ONGOING CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT 
WITH CERTAIN SCHOOLS.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Section 1746 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection: 
‘‘(c) CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT.—The President of the Defense 
Acquisition University shall work with the relevant professional 
schools and degree-granting institutions of the Department of 
Defense and military departments to ensure that best practices 
are used in curriculum development to support acquisition 
workforce positions.’’. 
(2) AMENDMENT TO SECTION HEADING.—(A) The heading 
of section 1746 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 1746. Defense Acquisition University’’. 
(B) The item relating to section 1746 in the table of sections 
at the beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 87 of such title 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘1746. Defense Acquisition University.’’. 
PART III—FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 
SEC. 881. AUDIT READINESS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) INTERIM MILESTONES.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller), in consultation with the Deputy Chief Manage-
ment Officer of the Department of Defense, the secretaries 
of the military departments, and the heads of the defense 
agencies and defense field activities, shall establish interim 
milestones for achieving audit readiness of the financial state-
ments of the Department of Defense, consistent with the 
requirements of section 1003 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2439; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). 
(2) MATTERS
INCLUDED.—The interim milestones estab-
lished pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, 
for each military department and for the defense agencies and 
defense field activities— 
(A) an interim milestone for achieving audit readiness 
for each major element of the statement of budgetary 
resources, including civilian pay, military pay, supply 
orders, contracts, and funds balance with the Treasury; 
and 
(B) an interim milestone for addressing the existence 
and completeness of each major category of Department 
of Defense assets, including military equipment, real prop-
erty, inventory, and operating material and supplies. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2222 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00852
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4307 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) DESCRIPTION IN SEMIANNUAL REPORTS.—The Under Sec-
retary shall describe each interim milestone established pursu-
ant to paragraph (1) in the next semiannual report submitted 
pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2439; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). Each subsequent semiannual report 
submitted pursuant to section 1003(b) shall explain how the 
Department has progressed toward meeting such interim mile-
stones. 
(b) VALUATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSETS.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) shall, in consultation with other appropriate Fed-
eral agencies and officials— 
(A) examine the costs and benefits of alternative 
approaches to the valuation of Department of Defense 
assets; 
(B) select an approach to such valuation that is con-
sistent with principles of sound financial management and 
the conservation of taxpayer resources; and 
(C) begin the preparation of a business case analysis 
supporting the selected approach. 
(2) The Under Secretary shall include information on the 
alternatives considered, the selected approach, and the business 
case analysis supporting that approach in the next semiannual 
report submitted pursuant to section 1003(b) of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2439; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). 
(c) REMEDIAL ACTIONS REQUIRED.—In the event that the 
Department of Defense, or any component of the Department of 
Defense, is unable to meet an interim milestone established pursu-
ant to subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) 
shall— 
(1) develop a remediation plan to ensure that— 
(A) the component will meet the interim milestone 
no more than one year after the originally scheduled date; 
and 
(B) the component’s failure to meet the interim mile-
stone will not have an adverse impact on the Department’s 
ability to carry out the plan under section 1003(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2439; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note); 
and 
(2) include in the next semiannual report submitted pursu-
ant to section 1003(b) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2439; 
10 U.S.C. 2222 note)— 
(A) a statement of the reasons why the Department 
of Defense, or component of the Department of Defense, 
will be unable to meet such interim milestone; 
(B) the revised completion date for meeting such 
interim milestone; and 
(C) a description of the actions that have been taken 
and are planned to be taken by the Department of Defense, 
or component of the Department of Defense, to meet such 
interim milestone. 
(d) INCENTIVES FOR ACHIEVING AUDITABILITY.— 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00853
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4308 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of 
Defense (Comptroller) shall review options for providing appro-
priate incentives to the military departments, Defense Agencies, 
and defense field activities to ensure that financial statements 
are validated as ready for audit earlier than September 30, 
2017. 
(2) OPTIONS REVIEWED.—The review performed pursuant 
to paragraph (1) shall consider changes in policy that reflect 
the increased confidence that can be placed in auditable finan-
cial statements, and shall include, at a minimum, consideration 
of the following options: 
(A) Consistent with the need to fund urgent warfighter 
requirements and operational needs, priority in the release 
of appropriated funds. 
(B) Relief from the frequency of financial reporting 
in cases in which such reporting is not required by law. 
(C) Relief from departmental obligation and expendi-
ture thresholds to the extent that such thresholds establish 
requirements more restrictive than those required by law. 
(D) Increases in thresholds for reprogramming of funds. 
(E) Personnel management incentives for the financial 
and business management workforce. 
(F) Such other measures as the Under Secretary con-
siders appropriate. 
(3) REPORT.—The Under Secretary shall include a discus-
sion of the review performed pursuant to paragraph (1) in 
the next semiannual report pursuant to section 1003(b) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2439; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) and for 
each option considered pursuant to paragraph (2) shall 
include— 
(A) an assessment of the extent to which the 
implementation of the option— 
(i) would be consistent with the efficient operation 
of the Department of Defense and the effective funding 
of essential Department of Defense programs and 
activities; and 
(ii) would contribute to the achievement of Depart-
ment of Defense goals to prepare auditable financial 
statements; and 
(B) a recommendation on whether such option should 
be adopted, a schedule for implementing the option if adop-
tion is recommended, or a reason for not recommending 
the option if adoption is not recommended. 
SEC. 882. REVIEW OF OBLIGATION AND EXPENDITURE THRESHOLDS. 
(a) PROCESS REVIEW.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Management Officer of 
the Department of Defense, in coordination with the Chief Manage-
ment Officer of each military department, the Director of the Office 
of Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis, the Under 
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and the Comptrollers of the 
military departments, shall complete a comprehensive review of 
the use and value of obligation and expenditure benchmarks and 
propose new benchmarks or processes for tracking financial 
performance, including, as appropriate— 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2222 
note. 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00854
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4309 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) increased reliance on individual obligation and expendi-
ture plans for measuring program financial performance; 
(2) mechanisms to improve funding stability and to increase 
the predictability of the release of funding for obligation and 
expenditure; and 
(3) streamlined mechanisms for a program manager to 
submit an appeal for funding changes and to have such appeal 
evaluated promptly. 
(b) TRAINING.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics and the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Comptroller) shall ensure that, as part of the training required 
for program managers and business managers, an emphasis is 
placed on obligating and expending appropriated funds in a manner 
that achieves the best value for the Government and that the 
purpose and limitations of obligation and expenditure benchmarks 
are made clear. 
(c) REPORT.—The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the 
Department of Defense shall include a report on the results of 
the review under this section in the next update of the strategic 
management plan transmitted to the Committees on Armed Serv-
ices of the Senate and the House of Representatives under section 
904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 275; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 
2201) after the completion of the review. 
SEC. 883. DISCLOSURE AND TRACEABILITY OF THE COST OF DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE HEALTH CARE CONTRACTS. 
(a) REPORT.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than September 30, 2011, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 
to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
a detailed report on the additional cost to the Department 
of Defense associated with compliance with the Patient Protec-
tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the 
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public 
Law 111–152). 
(2) MATTERS COVERED.—The report required by paragraph 
(1) shall include an estimate of— 
(A) the additional costs, if any, incurred on health 
care contracts to comply with such Acts; and 
(B) any other additional costs to the Department of 
Defense to comply with such Acts. 
(b) HEALTH CARE CONTRACT DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘health care contract’’ means a contract awarded by the 
Department of Defense in an amount greater than the simplified 
acquisition threshold for the acquisition of any of the following: 
(1) Medical supplies. 
(2) Health care services and administration, including the 
services of medical personnel. 
(3) Durable medical equipment. 
(4) Pharmaceuticals. 
(5) Health care-related information technology. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00855
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4310 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
PART IV—INDUSTRIAL BASE 
SEC. 891. EXPANSION OF THE INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) PROGRAM TO EXPAND INDUSTRIAL BASE REQUIRED.—The 
Secretary of Defense shall establish a program to expand the indus-
trial base of the Department of Defense to increase the Depart-
ment’s access to innovation and the benefits of competition. 
(b) IDENTIFYING AND COMMUNICATING WITH FIRMS THAT ARE 
NOT TRADITIONAL SUPPLIERS.—The program established under sub-
section (a) shall use tools and resources available within the Federal 
Government and available from the private sector to provide a 
capability for identifying and communicating with firms that are 
not traditional suppliers, including commercial firms and firms 
of all business sizes, that are engaged in markets of importance 
to the Department of Defense in which such firms can make a 
significant contribution. 
(c) OUTREACH
TO LOCAL FIRMS NEAR DEFENSE INSTALLA-
TIONS.—The program established under subsection (a) shall include 
outreach, using procurement technical assistance centers, to firms 
of all business sizes in the vicinity of Department of Defense 
installations regarding opportunities to obtain contracts and sub-
contracts to perform work at such installations. 
(d) INDUSTRIAL BASE REVIEW.—The program established under 
subsection (a) shall include a continuous effort to review the indus-
trial base supporting the Department of Defense, including the 
identification of markets of importance to the Department of 
Defense in which firms that are not traditional suppliers can make 
a significant contribution. 
(e) FIRMS THAT ARE NOT TRADITIONAL SUPPLIERS.—For pur-
poses of this section, a firm is not a traditional supplier of the 
Department of Defense if it does not currently have contracts and 
subcontracts to perform work for the Department of Defense with 
a total combined value in excess of $500,000. 
(f) PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER.—In this sec-
tion, the term ‘‘procurement technical assistance center’’ means 
a center operating under a cooperative agreement with the Defense 
Logistics Agency to provide procurement technical assistance pursu-
ant to the authority provided in chapter 142 of title 10, United 
States Code. 
SEC. 892. PRICE TREND ANALYSIS FOR SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 
PURCHASED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) PRICE TREND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop 
and implement procedures that, to the maximum extent prac-
ticable, provide for the collection and analysis of information 
on price trends for covered supplies and equipment purchased 
by the Department of Defense. The procedures shall include 
an automated process for identifying categories of covered sup-
plies and equipment described in paragraph (2) that have 
experienced significant escalation in prices. 
(2) CATEGORY OF COVERED SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT.—A 
category of covered supplies and equipment referred to in para-
graph (1) consists of covered supplies and equipment that have 
the same National Stock Number, are in a single Federal 
Supply Group or Federal Supply Class, are provided by a single 
10 USC 2306a 
note. 
Definition. 
10 USC 2501 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00856
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4311 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
contractor, or are otherwise logically grouped for the purpose 
of analyzing information on price trends. 
(3) REQUIREMENT TO EXAMINE CAUSES OF ESCALATION.— 
An analysis conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include, 
for any category in which significant escalation in prices is 
identified, a more detailed examination of the causes of esca-
lation for such prices within the category and whether such 
price escalation is consistent across the Department of Defense. 
(4) REQUIREMENT TO ADDRESS UNJUSTIFIED ESCALATION.— 
The head of a Defense Agency or the Secretary of a military 
department shall take appropriate action to address any 
unjustified escalation in prices being paid for items procured 
by that agency or military department as identified in an 
analysis conducted pursuant to paragraph (1). 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than April 1 of each year, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of 
the House of Representatives a report on the analyses of price 
trends that were conducted for categories of covered supplies and 
equipment during the preceding fiscal year under the procedures 
implemented pursuant to paragraph (1). The report shall include 
a description of the actions taken to identify and address any 
unjustified price escalation for the categories of items. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) SUPPLIES
AND
EQUIPMENT.—The term ‘‘supplies and 
equipment’’ means items classified as supplies and equipment 
under the Federal Supply Classification System. 
(2) COVERED SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT.—The term ‘‘covered 
supplies and equipment’’ means all supplies and equipment 
purchased by the Department of Defense. The term does not 
include major weapon systems but does include individual parts 
and components purchased as spare or replenishment parts 
for such weapon systems. 
(d) SUNSET DATE.—This section shall not be in effect on and 
after April 1, 2015. 
SEC. 893. CONTRACTOR BUSINESS SYSTEMS. 
(a) IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Not later than 270 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall develop and initiate a program for the improvement of con-
tractor business systems to ensure that such systems provide timely, 
reliable information for the management of Department of Defense 
programs by the contractor and by the Department. 
(b) APPROVAL
OR DISAPPROVAL
OF BUSINESS SYSTEMS.—The 
program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 
(1) include system requirements for each type of contractor 
business system covered by the program; 
(2) establish a process for reviewing contractor business 
systems and identifying significant deficiencies in such systems; 
(3) identify officials of the Department of Defense who 
are responsible for the approval or disapproval of contractor 
business systems; 
(4) provide for the approval of any contractor business 
system that does not have a significant deficiency; and 
(5) provide for— 
(A) the disapproval of any contractor business system 
that has a significant deficiency; and 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00857
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4312 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) reduced reliance on, and enhanced scrutiny of, data 
provided by a contractor business system that has been 
disapproved. 
(c) REMEDIAL ACTIONS.—The program developed pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall provide the following: 
(1) In the event a contractor business system is disapproved 
pursuant to subsection (b)(5), appropriate officials of the 
Department of Defense will be available to work with the 
contractor to develop a corrective action plan defining specific 
actions to be taken to address the significant deficiencies identi-
fied in the system and a schedule for the implementation of 
such actions. 
(2) An appropriate official of the Department of Defense 
may withhold up to 10 percent of progress payments, perform-
ance-based payments, and interim payments under covered 
contracts from a covered contractor, as needed to protect the 
interests of the Department and ensure compliance, if one 
or more of the contractor business systems of the contractor 
has been disapproved pursuant to subsection (b)(5) and has 
not subsequently received approval. 
(3) The amount of funds to be withheld under paragraph 
(2) shall be reduced if a contractor adopts an effective corrective 
action plan pursuant to paragraph (1) and is effectively imple-
menting such plan. 
(d) GUIDANCE AND TRAINING.—The program developed pursuant 
to subsection (a) shall provide guidance and training to appropriate 
government officials on the data that is produced by contractor 
business systems and the manner in which such data should be 
used to effectively manage Department of Defense programs. 
(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to prohibit an official of the Department of Defense 
from reviewing, approving, or disapproving a contractor business 
system pursuant to any applicable law or regulation in force as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act during the period between 
the date of the enactment of this Act and the date on which 
the Secretary implements the requirements of this section with 
respect to such system. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘contractor business system’’ means an 
accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, 
earned value management system, material management and 
accounting system, or property management system of a con-
tractor. 
(2) The term ‘‘covered contractor’’ means a contractor that 
is subject to the cost accounting standards under section 26 
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
422). 
(3) The term ‘‘covered contract’’ means a cost-reimburse-
ment contract, incentive-type contract, time-and-materials con-
tract, or labor-hour contract that could be affected if the data 
produced by a contractor business system has a significant 
deficiency. 
(4) The term ‘‘significant deficiency’’, in the case of a con-
tractor business system, means a shortcoming in the system 
that materially affects the ability of officials of the Department 
of Defense and the contractor to rely upon information produced 
by the system that is needed for management purposes. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00858
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4313 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(g) DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY LEGAL RESOURCES AND 
EXPERTISE.— 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure 
that— 
(A) the Defense Contract Audit Agency has sufficient 
legal resources and expertise to conduct its work in compli-
ance with applicable Department of Defense policies and 
procedures; and 
(B) such resources and expertise are provided in a 
manner that is consistent with the audit independence 
of the Defense Contract Audit Agency. 
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives a report on the steps taken to comply with 
the requirements of this subsection. 
SEC. 894. REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON ELIMINATING BAR-
RIERS TO CONTRACTING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE. 
(a) REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense, 
acting through the Director of Small Business Programs in the 
Department of Defense, shall review barriers to firms that are 
not traditional suppliers to the Department of Defense wishing 
to contract with the Department of Defense and its defense supply 
centers and develop a set of recommendations on the elimination 
of such barriers. The Director shall identify and consult with a 
wide range of firms that are not traditional suppliers to the Depart-
ment of Defense for the purpose of identifying such barriers and 
developing such recommendations. 
(b) DEFINITION.—For the purposes of this section, a firm is 
not a traditional supplier of the Department of Defense if it does 
not currently have contracts and subcontracts to perform work 
for the Department of Defense with a total combined value in 
excess of $500,000. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
Congress a report summarizing the findings and recommendations 
of the review conducted pursuant to this section. 
SEC. 895. INCLUSION OF THE PROVIDERS OF SERVICES AND INFORMA-
TION TECHNOLOGY IN THE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND 
INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) REVISED DEFINITIONS.—Section 2500 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or maintenance’’ and 
inserting ‘‘integration, services, or information technology’’; 
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘or production’’ and 
inserting ‘‘production, integration, services, or information tech-
nology’’; 
(3) in paragraph (9)(A), by striking ‘‘and manufacturing’’ 
and inserting ‘‘manufacturing, integration, services, and 
information technology’’; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(15) The term ‘integration’ means the process of providing 
systems engineering and technical direction for a system for 
the purpose of achieving capabilities that satisfy program 
requirements.’’. 
Consultation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00859
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4314 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) REVISED OBJECTIVES.—Section 2501(a) of such title is 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Supplying and equipping’’ 
and inserting ‘‘Supplying, equipping, and supporting’’; 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and logistics for’’ and 
inserting ‘‘logistics, and other activities in support of’’; 
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and produce’’ and 
inserting ‘‘, produce, and support’’; and 
(4) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (8) and 
inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(6) Providing for the generation of services capabilities 
that are not core functions of the armed forces and that are 
critical to military operations within the national technology 
and industrial base. 
‘‘(7) Providing for the development, production, and integra-
tion of information technology within the national technology 
and industrial base.’’. 
(c) REVISED ASSESSMENTS.—Section 2505(b)(4) of such title is 
amended by inserting after ‘‘of this title)’’ the following ‘‘or major 
automated information system programs (as defined in section 
2445a of this title)’’. 
(d) REVISED POLICY GUIDANCE.—Section 2506(a) of such title 
is amended by striking ‘‘budget allocation, weapons’’ and inserting 
‘‘strategy, management, budget allocation,’’. 
SEC. 896. DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR MANUFAC-
TURING AND INDUSTRIAL BASE POLICY; INDUSTRIAL BASE 
FUND. 
(a) DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY
OF DEFENSE.—Chapter 7 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
section 139d the following new section: 
‘‘§ 139e. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufac-
turing and Industrial Base Policy 
‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT.—There is a Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy, who shall 
be appointed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics and shall report to the Under Secretary. 
‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy shall be 
the principal advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisi-
tion, Technology, and Logistics in the performance of the Under 
Secretary’s duties relating to the following: 
‘‘(1) Providing input on industrial base matters to strategy 
reviews, including quadrennial defense reviews conducted 
pursuant to section 118 of this title. 
‘‘(2) Establishing policies of the Department of Defense 
for maintenance of the defense industrial base of the United 
States. 
‘‘(3) Providing recommendations to the Under Secretary 
on budget matters pertaining to the industrial base. 
‘‘(4) Providing recommendations to the Under Secretary 
on supply chain management and supply chain vulnerability. 
‘‘(5) Providing input on industrial base matters to defense 
acquisition policy guidance. 
10 USC 2501. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00860
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4315 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(6) Establishing the national security objectives concerning 
the national technology and industrial base required under 
section 2501 of this title. 
‘‘(7) Executing the national defense program for analysis 
of the national technology and industrial base required under 
section 2503 of this title. 
‘‘(8) Performing the national technology and industrial base 
periodic defense capability assessments required under section 
2505 of this title. 
‘‘(9) Establishing the technology and industrial base policy 
guidance required under section 2506 of this title. 
‘‘(10) Executing the authorities of the Manufacturing Tech-
nology Program under section 2521 of this title. 
‘‘(11) Carrying out the activities of the Department of 
Defense relating to the Defense Production Act Committee 
established under section 722 of the Defense Production Act 
of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2171). 
‘‘(12) Consistent with section 2(b) of the Defense Production 
Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b)), executing other applicable 
authorities provided under the Defense Production Act of 1950 
(50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), including authorities under titles 
I and II of such Act. 
‘‘(13) Establishing policies related to international tech-
nology security and export control issues. 
‘‘(14) Establishing policies related to industrial independent 
research and development programs under section 2372 of this 
title. 
‘‘(15) Such other duties as are assigned by the Under Sec-
retary. 
‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (b)(9) may 
be construed to limit the authority or modify the policies of the 
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States established 
under section 721(k) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 
U.S.C. App. 2170(k)).’’. 
(b) INDUSTRIAL BASE FUND.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 148 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 2508. Industrial Base Fund 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish 
an Industrial Base Fund (in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’). 
‘‘(b) CONTROL OF FUND.—The Fund shall be under the control 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics, acting through the Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy. 
‘‘(c) AMOUNTS IN FUND.—The Fund shall consist of amounts 
appropriated or otherwise made available to the Fund. 
‘‘(d) USE OF FUND.—Subject to subsection (e), the Fund shall 
be used— 
‘‘(1) to support the monitoring and assessment of the indus-
trial base required by this chapter; 
‘‘(2) to address critical issues in the industrial base relating 
to urgent operational needs; 
‘‘(3) to support efforts to expand the industrial base; and 
‘‘(4) to address supply chain vulnerabilities. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00861
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4316 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(e) USE OF FUND SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATIONS.—The authority 
of the Secretary of Defense to use the Fund under this section 
in any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations 
for that purpose. 
‘‘(f) EXPENDITURES.—The Secretary shall establish procedures 
for expending monies in the Fund in support of the uses identified 
in subsection (d), including the following: 
‘‘(1) Direct obligations from the Fund. 
‘‘(2) Transfers of monies from the Fund to relevant appro-
priations of the Department of Defense.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item: 
‘‘2508. Industrial Base Fund.’’. 
TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 
Sec. 901. Reorganization of Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out reduction 
required by law in number of Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
Sec. 911. Integrated space architectures. 
Sec. 912. Limitation on use of funds for costs of terminating contracts under the 
National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System 
Program. 
Sec. 913. Limitation on use of funds for purchasing Global Positioning System user 
equipment. 
Sec. 914. Plan for integration of space-based nuclear detection sensors. 
Sec. 915. Preservation of the solid rocket motor industrial base. 
Sec. 916. Implementation plan to sustain solid rocket motor industrial base. 
Sec. 917. Review and plan on sustainment of liquid rocket propulsion systems in-
dustrial base. 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 
Sec. 921. Five-year extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in 
commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. 
Sec. 922. Modification of attendees at proceedings of Intelligence, Surveillance, and 
Reconnaissance Integration Council. 
Sec. 923. Report on Department of Defense interservice management and coordina-
tion of remotely piloted aircraft support of intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance. 
Sec. 924. Report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management relating 
to Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance provided by 
remotely piloted aircraft. 
Subtitle D—Cyber Warfare, Cyber Security, and Related Matters 
Sec. 931. Continuous monitoring of Department of Defense information systems for 
cybersecurity. 
Sec. 932. Strategy on computer software assurance. 
Sec. 933. Strategy for acquisition and oversight of Department of Defense cyber 
warfare capabilities. 
Sec. 934. Report on the cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. 
Sec. 935. Reports on Department of Defense progress in defending the Department 
and the defense industrial base from cyber events. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
Sec. 941. Two-year extension of authorities relating to temporary waiver of reim-
bursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at De-
partment of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies. 
Sec. 942. Additional requirements for quadrennial roles and missions review in 
2011. 
Procedures. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00862
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4317 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 943. Report on organizational structure and policy guidance of the Department 
of Defense regarding information operations. 
Sec. 944. Report on organizational structures of the geographic combatant com-
mand headquarters. 
Subtitle A—Department of Defense 
Management 
SEC. 901. REORGANIZATION OF OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF 
DEFENSE TO CARRY OUT REDUCTION REQUIRED BY LAW 
IN 
NUMBER 
OF 
DEPUTY 
UNDER 
SECRETARIES 
OF 
DEFENSE. 
(a) REDESIGNATION OF CERTAIN POSITIONS IN OFFICE OF SEC-
RETARY OF DEFENSE.— 
(1) REDESIGNATION.—Positions in the Office of the Sec-
retary of Defense are hereby redesignated as follows: 
(A) The Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering. 
(B) The Director of Operational Energy Plans and Pro-
grams is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. 
(C) The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for 
Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs 
is redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. 
(2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, rule, regula-
tion, paper, or other record of the United States to an office 
of the Department of Defense redesignated by paragraph (1) 
shall be deemed to be a reference to such office as so redesig-
nated. 
(b) AMENDMENTS
TO CHAPTER 4 OF TITLE 10 RELATING
TO 
REORGANIZATION.— 
(1) REPEAL OF SEPARATE PRINCIPAL DEPUTY UNDER SEC-
RETARY
OF
DEFENSE
PROVISIONS.—Sections 133a, 134a, and 
136a of title 10, United States Code, are repealed. 
(2) COMPONENTS OF OSD.—Subsection (b) of section 131 
of such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) The Office of the Secretary of Defense is composed of 
the following: 
‘‘(1) The Deputy Secretary of Defense. 
‘‘(2) The Under Secretaries of Defense, as follows: 
‘‘(A) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics. 
‘‘(B) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. 
‘‘(C) The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller). 
‘‘(D) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel 
and Readiness. 
‘‘(E) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. 
‘‘(3) The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
‘‘(4) Other officers who are appointed by the President, 
by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who 
report directly to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary without 
intervening authority, as follows: 
Appointments. 
President. 
5 USC 3104 note; 
10 USC 1071 
note, 2358 note, 
2362, 2521 and 
note, 2925; 
20 USC 9631; 
22 USC 2751 
note. 
10 USC 131 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00863
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4318 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(A) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program 
Evaluation. 
‘‘(B) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. 
‘‘(C) The General Counsel of the Department of 
Defense. 
‘‘(D) The Inspector General of the Department of 
Defense. 
‘‘(5) The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. 
‘‘(6) The Assistant Secretaries of Defense. 
‘‘(7) Other officials provided for by law, as follows: 
‘‘(A) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Developmental Test and Evaluation appointed pursuant 
to section 139b(a) of this title. 
‘‘(B) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Systems Engineering appointed pursuant to section 139b(b) 
of this title. 
‘‘(C) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy appointed pursu-
ant to section 139c of this title. 
‘‘(D) The Director of Small Business Programs 
appointed pursuant to section 144 of this title. 
‘‘(E) The official designated under section 1501(a) of 
this title to have responsibility for Department of Defense 
matters relating to missing persons as set forth in section 
1501 of this title. 
‘‘(F) The Director of Family Policy under section 1781 
of this title. 
‘‘(G) The Director of the Office of Corrosion Policy 
and Oversight assigned pursuant to section 2228(a) of this 
title. 
‘‘(H) The official designated under section 2438(a) of 
this title to have responsibility for conducting and over-
seeing performance assessments and root cause analyses 
for major defense acquisition programs. 
‘‘(8) Such other offices and officials as may be established 
by law or the Secretary of Defense may establish or designate 
in the Office.’’. 
(3) PRINCIPAL DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE.— 
Section 137a of such title is amended— 
(A) in subsections (a)(1), (b), and (d), by striking 
‘‘Deputy Under’’ and inserting ‘‘Principal Deputy Under’’; 
(B) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘(A) The’’ and all 
that follows through ‘‘(5) of subsection (c)’’ and inserting 
‘‘The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’’; 
(C) in subsection (c)— 
(i) in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5), by 
striking ‘‘One of the Deputy’’ and inserting ‘‘One of 
the Principal Deputy’’; 
(ii) in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), by striking 
‘‘appointed’’ and all that follows through ‘‘this title’’; 
(iii) in paragraphs (4) and (5), by striking ‘‘shall 
be’’ and inserting ‘‘is’’; and 
(iv) in paragraph (5), by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ‘‘, who shall be appointed 
from among persons who have extensive expertise in 
intelligence matters’’; and 
10 USC 137. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00864
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4319 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(D) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The Principal Deputy Under Secretaries 
shall take precedence among themselves in the order pre-
scribed by the Secretary of Defense.’’. 
(4) ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE GENERALLY.—Sec-
tion 138 of such title is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘12’’ and inserting 
‘‘16’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(A) The’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘The other’’ and inserting 
‘‘The’’; 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6), by 
striking ‘‘shall be’’ and inserting ‘‘is’’; 
(ii) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘appointed pursu-
ant to section 138a of this title’’; and 
(iii) by adding at the end the following new para-
graphs: 
‘‘(8) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Research and Engineering. In addition 
to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering 
shall have the duties specified in section 138b of this title. 
‘‘(9) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. 
In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under para-
graph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational 
Energy Plans and Programs shall have the duties specified 
in section 138c of this title. 
‘‘(10) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological 
Defense Programs. In addition to any duties and powers pre-
scribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs shall 
have the duties specified in section 138d of this title.’’; and 
(C) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘and the Director 
of Defense Research and Engineering’’ and inserting ‘‘the 
Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of 
Defense, the officials serving in positions specified in sec-
tion 131(b)(4) of this title, and the Principal Deputy Under 
Secretaries of Defense’’. 
(5) ASSISTANT
SECRETARY
FOR
LOGISTICS
AND
MATERIEL 
READINESS.—Section 138a(a) of such title is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘There is a’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘, appointed from civilian life by the 
President, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate. The Assistant Secretary’’. 
(6) 
ASSISTANT
SECRETARY
FOR
RESEARCH
AND 
ENGINEERING.—Section 139a of such title is transferred so as 
to appear after section 138a, redesignated as section 138b, 
and amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (a); 
(B) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as sub-
sections (a) and (b), respectively; 
(C) in subsection (a), as so redesignated, by striking 
‘‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’’ and 
10 USC 138. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00865
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4320 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering’’; and 
(D) in subsection (b), as so redesignated— 
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Director of 
Defense Research and Engineering,’’ and inserting 
‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering,’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Director’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’. 
(7) ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR OPERATIONAL ENERGY PLANS 
AND PROGRAMS.—Section 139b of such title is transferred so 
as to appear after section 138b (as transferred and redesignated 
by paragraph (6)), redesignated as section 138c, and amended— 
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘There is a’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘The Director’’ and inserting ‘‘The 
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy 
Plans and Programs’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘Director’’ each place it appears and 
inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’; 
(C) in subsection (d)(2)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘Not later than’’ and all that follows 
through ‘‘military departments’’ and inserting ‘‘The 
Secretary of each military department’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘who will’’ and inserting ‘‘who 
shall’’; and 
(iii) by inserting ‘‘so designated’’ after ‘‘The offi-
cials’’; and 
(D) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘The initial’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘updates to the strategy’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Updates to the strategy required by paragraph 
(1)’’. 
(8) ASSISTANT
SECRETARY
FOR
NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL, AND 
BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAMS.—Section 142 of such title is 
transferred so as to appear after section 138c (as redesignated 
and transferred by paragraph (7)), redesignated as section 138d, 
and amended— 
(A) by striking subsection (a); 
(B) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (a) 
and in that subsection, as so redesignated, by striking 
‘‘The Assistant to the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Assist-
ant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and 
Biological Defense Programs’’; and 
(C) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the fol-
lowing new subsection (b): 
‘‘(b) The Assistant Secretary may communicate views on issues 
within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary directly to the 
Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense without 
obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within 
the Department of Defense.’’. 
(c) DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGEMENT OFFICER.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, 
is further amended by inserting after section 132 the following 
new section: 
10 USC 139. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00866
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4321 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘§ 132a. Deputy Chief Management Officer 
‘‘(a) APPOINTMENT.—There is a Deputy Chief Management 
Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life 
by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
‘‘(b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Deputy Chief Management Officer 
assists the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s 
capacity as Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense 
under section 132(c) of this title. 
‘‘(c) PRECEDENCE.—The Deputy Chief Management Officer 
takes precedence in the Department of Defense after the Secretary 
of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of 
the military departments, and the Under Secretaries of Defense.’’. 
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 132(c) of such title 
is amended by striking the second sentence. 
(d) SENIOR OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESS-
MENTS AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSES OF MDAPS.—Section 103 of 
the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 
111–23; 123 Stat. 1715; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is transferred to 
chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, inserted so as to 
appear after section 2437, redesignated as section 2438, and 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘section 2433a(a)(1) 
of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 206(a) 
of this Act)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2433a(a)(1) of this title’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)(5)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘section 2433a of title 10, United States 
Code (as so added)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2433a of this 
title’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘prior to’’ both places it appears and 
inserting ‘‘before’’; 
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘section 2433a of title 
10, United States Code (as so added)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 
2433a of this title’’; and 
(4) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘beginning in 2010,’’. 
(e) REDESIGNATION OF DDTE AS DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY 
FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION AND DSE AS DEPUTY 
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.— 
Section 139d of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘Director of Developmental Test and Evalua-
tion’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘Director of Systems Engineering’’ each place 
it appears and inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Systems Engineering’’; 
(3) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking the subsection heading and inserting 
‘‘DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOP-
MENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION.—’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘Director’’ each place it appears in 
paragraphs (2), (3), and (6) and inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant 
Secretary’’; 
(C) in paragraph (4), by striking the paragraph heading 
and inserting ‘‘COORDINATION WITH DEPUTY ASSISTANT SEC-
RETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.—’’; 
(D) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Director’’ in the 
matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘Deputy 
Assistant Secretary’’; and 
10 USC 132. 
President. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00867
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4322 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(E) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘Director’s’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’s’’; and 
(4) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking the subsection heading and inserting 
‘‘DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS 
ENGINEERING.—’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘Director’’ each place it appears in 
paragraphs (2), (3), (5), and (6) and inserting ‘‘Deputy 
Assistant Secretary’’; 
(C) in paragraph (4), by striking the paragraph heading 
and inserting ‘‘COORDINATION WITH DEPUTY ASSISTANT SEC-
RETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUA-
TION.—’’; and 
(D) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘Director’s’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant Secretary’s’’. 
(f) REORGANIZATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS WITHIN CHAPTER 
4 TO ACCOUNT FOR OTHER TRANSFERS OF PROVISIONS.—Chapter 
4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by redesig-
nating sections 139c, 139d (as amended by subsection (e)), and 
139e (as added by section 896 of this Act) as sections 139a, 139b, 
and 139c, respectively. 
(g) REPEAL
OF STATUTORY REQUIREMENT
FOR OFFICE
FOR 
MISSING PERSONNEL IN OSD.—Section 1501(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking the subsection heading and inserting the 
following: ‘‘RESPONSIBILITY FOR MISSING PERSONNEL.—’’; 
(2) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘establish within the Office of the Sec-
retary of Defense an office to have responsibility for Depart-
ment of Defense policy’’ in the first sentence and inserting 
‘‘designate within the Office of the Secretary of Defense 
an official as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to have 
responsibility for Department of Defense matters’’; 
(B) by striking the second sentence; 
(C) by striking ‘‘of the office’’ and inserting ‘‘of the 
official designated under this paragraph’’; 
(D) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A); 
(E) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subpara-
graph (C); and 
(F) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following 
new subparagraph (B): 
‘‘(B) policy, control, and oversight of the program estab-
lished under section 1509 of this title, as well as the accounting 
for missing persons (including locating, recovering, and identi-
fying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have 
ceased); and’’; 
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5) as 
paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 
(4) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new para-
graph (2): 
‘‘(2) The official designated under paragraph (1) shall also 
serve as the Director, Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Per-
sonnel Office, as established under paragraph (6)(A), exercising 
authority, direction, and control over that activity.’’. 
(5) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated— 
Designation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00868
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4323 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) by striking ‘‘of the office’’ the first place it appears; 
and 
(B) by striking ‘‘head of the office’’ and inserting ‘‘offi-
cial designated under paragraph (1) and (2)’’; 
(6) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated— 
(A) by striking ‘‘office’’ and inserting ‘‘designated offi-
cial’’; and 
(B) by inserting after ‘‘evasion)’’ the following: ‘‘and 
for personnel accounting (including locating, recovering, 
and identifying missing persons or their remains after hos-
tilities have ceased)’’; 
(7) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘office’’ 
and inserting ‘‘designated official’’; and 
(8) in paragraph (6), as so redesignated— 
(A) in subparagraph (A)— 
(i) by inserting after ‘‘(A)’’ the following: ‘‘The Sec-
retary of Defense shall establish an activity to account 
for personnel who are missing or whose remains have 
not been recovered from the conflict in which they 
were lost. This activity shall be known as the Defense 
Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office.’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘office’’ both places it appears and 
inserting ‘‘activity’’; 
(B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ‘‘to the office’’ 
and inserting ‘‘activity’’; 
(C) in subparagraph (B)(ii)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘to the office’’ and inserting 
‘‘activity’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘of the office’’ and inserting ‘‘of 
the activity’’; and 
(D) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘office’’ and 
inserting ‘‘activity’’. 
(h) CLARIFICATION OF HEAD OF OFFICE FOR FAMILY POLICY.— 
Section 1781 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking the second sentence and 
inserting the following new sentence: ‘‘The office shall be headed 
by the Director of Family Policy, who shall serve within the 
office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness.’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘the Office’’ each place it appears and 
inserting ‘‘the Director’’. 
(i) MODIFICATION OF STATUTORY LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF 
DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE.— 
(1) DELAY IN LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF DUSDS.—Section 
906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a 
note) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2011’’ and inserting 
‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 
(2) TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR ADDITIONAL DUSDS.—During 
the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act and ending on January 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense 
may, in the Secretary’s discretion, appoint not more than five 
Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense in addition to the five 
Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense authorized by 
section 137a of title 10, United States Code (as amended by 
subsection (b)(3)). 
(3) REPORT ON PLAN FOR REORGANIZATION OF OSD.— 
Time period. 
10 USC 137a 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00869
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4324 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than September 15, 
2013, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Commit-
tees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 
Representatives a report setting forth a plan for the 
realignment of the organizational structure of the Office 
of the Secretary of Defense to comply with the requirement 
of section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as amended by paragraph (1). 
(B) ELEMENTS.—In preparing the report required by 
subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider, at a min-
imum, the feasibility of taking the following actions on 
or before January 1, 2015: 
(i) A merger of the position of Deputy Under Sec-
retary of Defense (Installations and Environment) and 
the position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Oper-
ational Energy Plans and Programs (as established 
in accordance with the amendments made by sub-
section (b)(7)) into a single Assistant Secretary position. 
(ii) A realignment of positions within the Office 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to elimi-
nate the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 
(Strategy, Plans, and Forces). 
(j) OTHER CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10.— 
(1) Section 179(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(A) in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking ‘‘Assistant 
to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and 
Biological Defense Programs’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological 
Defense Programs’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘that Assistant to 
the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’. 
(2) Section 2272 of such title is amended by striking 
‘‘Director of Defense Research and Engineering’’ each place 
it appears and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Research and Engineering’’. 
(3) Section 2365 of such title is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Director of Defense 
Research and Engineering’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Sec-
retary’’; 
(B) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘Director’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’; 
(C) in subsection (d)(2)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘Director of Defense Research and 
Engineering’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Research and Engineering’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Director may’’ and inserting 
‘‘Assistant Secretary may’’; and 
(D) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘Director’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’. 
(4) Sections 2350a(g)(3), 2366b(a)(3)(D), 2374a(a), and 
2517(a) of such title are amended by striking ‘‘Director of 
Defense Research and Engineering’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’’. 
(5) Section 2902(b) of such title is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Deputy Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Science and Technology’’ and inserting 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00870
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4325 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘official within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of 
Defense for Research and Engineering who is responsible 
for science and technology’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘Deputy Under Sec-
retary of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘official within the Office 
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics who is’’. 
(k) SECTION HEADING AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION HEADING AMENDMENTS.— 
(A) The heading of section 137a of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 137a. Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense’’. 
(B) The heading of section 138b of such title, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(6), is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138b. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering’’. 
(C) The heading of section 138c of such title, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(7), is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational 
Energy Plans and Programs’’. 
(D) The heading of section 138d of such title, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(8), is amended 
to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 138d. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, 
and Biological Defense Programs’’. 
(E) The section heading of section 139b of such title, 
as redesignated by subsection (f), is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘§ 139b. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Develop-
mental Test and Evaluation; Deputy Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Systems Engineering: joint 
guidance’’. 
(F) The heading of section 2438 of such title, as trans-
ferred and redesignated by subsection (d), is amended to 
read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2438. Performance assessments and root cause analyses’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(A) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 
4 of such title is amended— 
(i) by inserting after the item relating to section 
132 the following new item: 
‘‘132a. Deputy Chief Management Officer.’’; 
(ii) by striking the items relating to sections 133a, 
134a, and 136a; 
(iii) by striking the item relating to section 137a 
and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘137a. Principal Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.’’; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00871
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4326 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(iv) by inserting after the item relating to section 
138a the following new items: 
‘‘138b. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. 
‘‘138c. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs. 
‘‘138d. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense 
Programs.’’; 
(v) by striking the items relating to sections 139a, 
139b, 139c, and 139d and inserting the following new 
items: 
‘‘139a. Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. 
‘‘139b. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evalua-
tion; Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering: 
joint guidance. 
‘‘139c. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manufacturing and Industrial Base 
Policy.’’; and 
(vi) by striking the item relating to section 142. 
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 
144 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 2437 the following new item: 
‘‘2438. Performance assessments and root cause analyses.’’. 
(l) OTHER CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) PUBLIC LAW 111–23.—Section 102(b) of the Weapon Sys-
tems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 123 
Stat. 1714; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Director of Developmental Test and 
Evaluation and the Director of Systems Engineering’’ each 
place it appears and inserting ‘‘Deputy Assistant Secretary 
of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation and 
the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems 
Engineering’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3)— 
(i) by striking the paragraph heading and inserting 
‘‘ASSESSMENT OF REPORTS BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SEC-
RETARY
OF
DEFENSE
FOR
DEVELOPMENTAL
TEST
AND 
EVALUATION
AND
DEPUTY
ASSISTANT
SECRETARY
OF 
DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.—’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Directors’’ and inserting ‘‘Deputy 
Assistant Secretaries of Defense’’. 
(2) PUBLIC
LAW
110–181.—Section 214 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2521 
note) is amended by striking ‘‘Director of Defense Research 
and Engineering’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense 
for Research and Engineering’’. 
(m) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) Section 131(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ‘‘his’’ and inserting ‘‘the Secretary’s’’. 
(2) Section 132 of such title is amended by redesignating 
subsection (d), as added by section 2831(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division 
B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2669), as subsection (e). 
(3) Section 135(c) of such title is amended by striking 
‘‘clauses’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs’’. 
(n) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) NUMBER OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE POSI-
TIONS.—Section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is amended 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00872
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4327 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
by striking the item relating to Assistant Secretaries of Defense 
and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16).’’. 
(2) POSITIONS REDESIGNATED AS ASD POSITIONS.— 
(A) Section 5315 of such title is further amended by 
striking the item relating to Director of Defense Research 
and Engineering. 
(B) Section 5316 of such title is amended by striking 
the item relating to Assistant to the Secretary of Defense 
for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs. 
(3) AMENDMENTS TO STRIKE REFERENCES TO POSITIONS IN 
SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE.—Section 5316 of such title is fur-
ther amended— 
(A) by striking the item relating to Director, Defense 
Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of 
Defense; 
(B) by striking the item relating to Deputy General 
Counsel, Department of Defense; 
(C) by striking the item relating to Deputy Under 
Secretaries of Defense for Research and Engineering, 
Department of Defense; and 
(D) by striking the item relating to Special Assistant 
to the Secretary of Defense. 
(o) INAPPLICABILITY OF APPOINTMENT REQUIREMENT TO CERTAIN 
INDIVIDUALS SERVING ON EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Notwithstanding this section and the 
amendments made by this section, the individual serving as 
specified in paragraph (2) on December 31, 2010, may continue 
to serve in the applicable position specified in that paragraph 
after that date without the requirement for appointment by 
the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. 
(2) COVERED INDIVIDUALS AND POSITIONS.—The individuals 
and positions specified in this paragraph are the following: 
(A) In the case of the individual serving as Director 
of Defense Research and Engineering, the position of 
Assistant 
Secretary 
of 
Defense 
for 
Research 
and 
Engineering. 
(B) In the case of the individual serving as Director 
of Operational Energy Plans and Programs, the position 
of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy 
Plans and Programs. 
(C) In the case of the individual serving as Assistant 
to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and 
Biological Defense Programs, the position of Assistant Sec-
retary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological 
Defense Programs. 
(p) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), this 
section and the amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 2011. 
(2) CERTAIN MATTERS.—Subsection (i) and the amendments 
made by that subsection, and subsection (o), shall take effect 
on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
10 USC 131 note. 
10 USC 131 note. 
5 USC 5315. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00873
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4328 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle B—Space Activities 
SEC. 911. INTEGRATED SPACE ARCHITECTURES. 
The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intel-
ligence shall develop an integrated process for national security 
space architecture planning, development, coordination, and anal-
ysis that— 
(1) encompasses defense and intelligence space plans, pro-
grams, budgets, and organizations; 
(2) provides mid-term to long-term recommendations to 
guide space-related defense and intelligence acquisitions, 
requirements, and investment decisions; 
(3) is independent of, but coordinated with, the space 
architecture planning, development, coordination, and analysis 
activities of each military department and each element of 
the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the 
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))); and 
(4) makes use of, to the maximum extent practicable, joint 
duty assignment (as defined in section 668 of title 10, United 
States Code) positions. 
SEC. 912. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR COSTS OF TERMINATING 
CONTRACTS UNDER THE NATIONAL POLAR-ORBITING 
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE SYSTEM PRO-
GRAM. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 
made available by this Act to the Secretary of Defense for the 
National 
Polar-Orbiting 
Operational 
Environmental 
Satellite 
System Program may be obligated or expended for the costs of 
terminating a contract awarded under the Program unless the 
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce enter into 
an agreement under which the Secretary of Defense and the Sec-
retary of Commerce will each be responsible for half the costs 
of terminating the contract. 
SEC. 913. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASING GLOBAL 
POSITIONING SYSTEM USER EQUIPMENT. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsections (b) and 
(c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 
made available by this Act or any other Act for the Department 
of Defense may be obligated or expended to purchase user equip-
ment for the Global Positioning System during fiscal years after 
fiscal year 2017 unless the equipment is capable of receiving the 
military code (commonly known as the ‘‘M code’’) from the Global 
Positioning System. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation under subsection (a) shall not 
apply with respect to the purchase of passenger vehicles or commer-
cial vehicles in which Global Positioning System equipment is 
installed. 
(c) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation 
under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that— 
(1) suitable user equipment capable of receiving the mili-
tary code from the Global Positioning System is not available; 
or 
(2) with respect to a purchase of user equipment, the 
Department of Defense does not require that user equipment 
10 USC 2281 
note. 
10 USC 2271 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00874
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4329 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to be capable of receiving the military code from the Global 
Positioning System. 
SEC. 914. PLAN FOR INTEGRATION OF SPACE-BASED NUCLEAR DETEC-
TION SENSORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consulta-
tion with the Director of National Intelligence and the Adminis-
trator for Nuclear Security, submit to the congressional defense 
committees a plan to integrate space-based nuclear detection sen-
sors in a geosynchronous orbit on the Space-Based Infrared System 
or other satellite platforms. 
(b) LIMITATION
ON USE
OF FUNDS
FOR
THE SPACE-BASED 
INFRARED SYSTEM.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 90 percent of the amounts 
specified in paragraph (2) may be obligated or expended before 
the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the 
congressional defense committees the plan required by sub-
section (a). 
(2) AMOUNTS
SPECIFIED.—The amounts specified in this 
paragraph are the following: 
(A) The amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 103 for procurement for the Air Force for missiles 
for the Space-Based Infrared System. 
(B) The amount authorized to be appropriated by sec-
tion 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation 
for the Air Force for the Space-Based Infrared System. 
SEC. 915. PRESERVATION OF THE SOLID ROCKET MOTOR INDUSTRIAL 
BASE. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation 
with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 
a report on the impact of the cancellation of the Constellation 
program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
on any anticipated next generation mission requirements for missile 
defense interceptors, tactical and strategic missiles, targets, and 
satellite and human spaceflight launch vehicles. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description and assessment of the effects on Depart-
ment of Defense programs that utilize solid rocket motors of 
the cancellation of the Ares I, the Ares V, or their solid rocket 
alternatives or derivatives, and all supporting elements. 
(2) A description of the plans of the Department of Defense 
to mitigate the impact of the cancellation of the Ares I, the 
Ares V, or their solid rocket alternatives or derivatives, and 
all supporting elements, on the United States solid rocket motor 
industrial base, including a description of the National Aero-
nautics and Space Administration and Department of Defense 
funding required to implement such plans between fiscal years 
2012 and 2017. 
(3) A description of the impact of the cancellation of the 
Ares I, Ares V, or their solid rocket alternatives or derivatives, 
and all supporting elements, on international partners in pro-
grams such as the D–5 Trident missile. 
(4) A detailed description of the source of the data used 
in the report. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00875
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4330 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 
subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 
(1) the Committees on Armed Services, Commerce, Science, 
and Transportation, and Appropriations of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committees on Armed Services, Science and Tech-
nology, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 
SEC. 916. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO SUSTAIN SOLID ROCKET MOTOR 
INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop an 
implementation plan to sustain the solid rocket motor industrial 
base that— 
(1) is based on the recommendations included in the report 
submitted to the congressional defense committees under sec-
tion 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2479); and 
(2) includes a funding plan for carrying out the implementa-
tion plan. 
(b) SUBMITTAL
TO
CONGRESS.—The implementation plan 
required by subsection (a) shall be submitted to Congress with 
the budget of the President for fiscal year 2012 as submitted under 
section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. 
SEC. 917. REVIEW AND PLAN ON SUSTAINMENT OF LIQUID ROCKET 
PROPULSION SYSTEMS INDUSTRIAL BASE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consulta-
tion with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, review, and develop a plan to sustain, the liquid 
rocket propulsion systems industrial base. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The review and plan required by subsection 
(a) shall address the following: 
(1) The capacity to maintain currently available liquid 
rocket propulsion systems. 
(2) The maintenance of an intellectual and engineering 
capacity to support next generation liquid rocket propulsion 
systems and engines, as needed. 
(3) Opportunities for interagency collaboration and research 
and development on future propulsion systems. 
(c) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees the plan required by sub-
section (a). 
Subtitle C—Intelligence-Related Matters 
SEC. 921. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF 
DEFENSE TO ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS 
SECURITY FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES. 
The second sentence of section 431(a) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 
SEC. 922. MODIFICATION OF ATTENDEES AT PROCEEDINGS OF INTEL-
LIGENCE, 
SURVEILLANCE, 
AND 
RECONNAISSANCE 
INTEGRATION COUNCIL. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Section 923(a)(4) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–163; 117 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00876
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4331 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Stat. 1574; 10 U.S.C. 426 note) is amended by striking ‘‘National 
Foreign Intelligence Program (NFIP), Joint Military Intelligence 
Program (JMIP), and Tactical Intelligence and Related Activities 
Program (TIARA)’’ and inserting ‘‘National Intelligence Program 
(NIP) and a Military Intelligence Program (MIP)’’. 
(b) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED ATTENDEES.—Section 426(a) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) Each Secretary of a military department may designate 
an officer or employee of such military department to attend the 
proceedings of the Council as a representative of such military 
department.’’. 
SEC. 923. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERSERVICE 
MANAGEMENT 
AND 
COORDINATION 
OF 
REMOTELY 
PILOTED 
AIRCRAFT 
SUPPORT 
OF 
INTELLIGENCE, 
SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) REPORT
TO
SECRETARY
OF
DEFENSE
BY
CHIEFS
OF 
STAFF.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval 
Operations, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall jointly 
submit to the Secretary of Defense a report, in accordance 
with this section, on remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) support 
of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) within 
their respective Armed Forces. 
(2) TRANSMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 
after the receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the 
Secretary shall transmit the report, together with the assess-
ment and any recommendations of the Secretary (including 
the matters required pursuant to subsection (b)(2)), to the 
congressional defense committees. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) In the case of the report required by subsection (a)(1), 
a description by each chief of staff referred to in that subsection 
of— 
(A) current and planned remotely piloted aircraft 
inventories to support intelligence, surveillance, and recon-
naissance requirements over the period 2011 to 2020, 
including an identification of systems each Armed Force 
considers organic and the systems capable of providing 
theater-level support to the commanders of the combatant 
commands; 
(B) policy and processes of each Armed Force for coordi-
nating investments in remotely piloted aircraft to meet 
joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance and to eliminate unnecessary duplication 
in both development and capability; and 
(C) the current employment of remotely piloted aircraft 
by each Armed Force, including the number of remotely 
piloted aircraft deployed in support operations, the number 
of remotely piloted aircraft assigned for training, and the 
number of remotely piloted aircraft warehoused, the 
capacity of each Armed Force to process, exploit, and 
disseminate intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
data collected, and the extent to which assets are provided 
Assessment. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00877
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4332 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to the joint community to meet requirements of the combat-
ant commands. 
(2) In the case of the transmittal required by subsection 
(a)(2)— 
(A) an assessment of the effectiveness of the employ-
ment of remotely piloted aircraft by each Armed Force, 
and a description of the percentage of joint force require-
ments for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
that are being met by the remotely piloted aircraft of 
each Armed Force; 
(B) a description of the joint concept of operations 
under which each Armed Force provides intelligence, 
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities through 
remotely piloted aircraft to meet the requirements of the 
combatant commands; 
(C) a description of the processes by which current 
requirements of the commanders of the combatant com-
mands for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance 
are validated, and how the remotely piloted aircraft 
capabilities of each Armed Force are assigned against vali-
dated requirements; 
(D) a description of the current intelligence, surveil-
lance, and reconnaissance requirements of each combatant 
command through remotely piloted aircraft; 
(E) a description of how the requirements described 
under subparagraph (D) are being met; 
(F) an identification of any mission degradation or 
failure within the combatant commands due to lack of 
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support; 
(G) a description of various means of addressing any 
shortfalls in meeting the requirements described under 
subparagraph (D), including temporary shortfalls and 
permanent shortfalls; 
(H) a description of the organization of the Unmanned 
Aerial System Task Force, including the goals and objec-
tives of the task force and the participation and roles 
of each Armed Force within the task force; 
(I) a description of the organization of the Intelligence, 
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Task Force, including 
the goals and objectives of the task force and the participa-
tion and roles of each Armed Force within the task force; 
and 
(J) an identification of any theater-level intelligence, 
surveillance, and reconnaissance capacity of an Armed 
Force that is not being made available by services to fulfill 
joint force requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance. 
(c) REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘remotely piloted aircraft’’ means any unmanned aircraft 
operated remotely, whether within or beyond line-of-sight, including 
unmanned aerial systems (UAS), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), 
remotely piloted vehicles (RPV), and remotely piloted aircraft (RPA). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00878
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4333 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 924. REPORT ON REQUIREMENTS FULFILLMENT AND PERSONNEL 
MANAGEMENT RELATING TO AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE, 
SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE PROVIDED BY 
REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall, 
in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology, and Logistics and the Under Secretary of Defense for 
Intelligence, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 
report on requirements fulfillment and personnel management in 
connection with Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnais-
sance (ISR) provided by remotely piloted aircraft (RPA). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the Joint Concept of Operation under 
which the Air Force operates to fulfill intelligence, surveillance, 
and reconnaissance requirements provided by remotely piloted 
aircraft. 
(2) A description of the current requirements of each 
combatant command for Air Force intelligence, surveillance, 
and reconnaissance provided by remotely piloted aircraft, 
including— 
(A) the number of orbits or combat air patrols for 
each major platform and sensor payload combination; 
(B) the number of aircraft, aircraft operators, and 
ground crews in each orbit or combat air patrol, variations 
in the numbers of each, and the explanation for such vari-
ations; 
(C) a description of how requirements are being met 
by the management of personnel, platforms, sensors, and 
networks; and 
(D) a description of various means of addressing any 
shortfalls in meeting such requirements, including tem-
porary shortfalls and permanent shortfalls. 
(3) A description of manpower management to fulfill Air 
Force mission requirements for intelligence, surveillance, and 
reconnaissance requirements provided by remotely piloted air-
craft, including the current number of personnel associated 
with each combat air patrol by remotely piloted aircraft for 
aircraft pilots, sensor operators, mission intelligence coordina-
tors, and processing, exploitation, and dissemination analysts 
(in this section referred to as ‘‘operators and analysts for 
remotely piloted aircraft’’). 
(4) A description of current Air Force manpower require-
ments for operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft, 
and any plans for meeting such requirements, including— 
(A) an identification of any shortfalls in personnel, 
skill specialties, and grades; and 
(B) any plans of the Air Force to address such short-
falls, including— 
(i) plans to address shortfalls in applicable career 
field retention rates; and 
(ii) plans for utilization of National Guard and 
other reserve component personnel to address short-
falls in such personnel, skill specialties, and grades. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00879
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4334 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(5) A description of the projected Air Force manpower 
requirements for operators and analysts for remotely piloted 
aircraft in each of 2015 and 2020, including— 
(A) an identification of any significant challenges to 
achieving such requirements in particular skill specialties 
and grades; and 
(B) any plans of the Air Force to address such chal-
lenges. 
(6) A description of the collaboration of the Air Force with, 
and the reliance of the Air Force on, the other Armed Forces 
and the combat support agencies, in asset management for 
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance by remotely 
piloted aircraft, including personnel for processing, exploitation, 
and dissemination. 
(7) A description of potential adverse consequences of oper-
ating intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance by remotely 
piloted aircraft, and associated intelligence support infrastruc-
ture, in a surge, understaffed state, or both, including— 
(A) the impact of having to provide forward processing, 
exploitation, and dissemination to support emerging 
capabilities; and 
(B) any plans of the Air Force to mitigate such con-
sequences. 
(8) A description of the status of Air Force training pro-
grams for operators and analysts for remotely piloted aircraft, 
including the ability to meet Air Force manpower requirements 
for such operators and analysts, and plans for increasing 
training capacity to match plans for expanding Air Force intel-
ligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. 
(c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 
the Senate; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives. 
Subtitle D—Cyber Warfare, Cyber 
Security, and Related Matters 
SEC. 931. CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR CYBERSECURITY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the 
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense to work, 
in coordination with the Chief Information Officers of the military 
departments 
and 
the 
Defense 
Agencies 
and 
with 
senior 
cybersecurity and information assurance officials within the Depart-
ment of Defense and otherwise within the Federal Government, 
to achieve, to the extent practicable, the following: 
(1) The continuous prioritization of the policies, principles, 
standards, and guidelines developed under section 20 of the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 
278g–3) with agencies and offices operating or exercising control 
of national security systems (including the National Security 
Agency) based upon the evolving threat of information security 
10 USC 2223 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00880
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4335 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
incidents with respect to national security systems, the vulner-
ability of such systems to such incidents, and the consequences 
of information security incidents involving such systems. 
(2) The automation of continuous monitoring of the 
effectiveness of the information security policies, procedures, 
and practices within the information infrastructure of the 
Department of Defense, and the compliance of that infrastruc-
ture with such policies, procedures, and practices, including 
automation of— 
(A) management, operational, and technical controls 
of every information system identified in the inventory 
required under section 3505(c) of title 44, United States 
Code; and 
(B) management, operational, and technical controls 
relied on for evaluations under section 3545 of title 44, 
United States Code. 
(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘information security incident’’ means an 
occurrence that— 
(A) actually or potentially jeopardizes the confiden-
tiality, integrity, or availability of an information system 
or the information such system processes, stores, or trans-
mits; or 
(B) constitutes a violation or imminent threat of viola-
tion of security policies, security procedures, or acceptable 
use policies with respect to an information system. 
(2) The term ‘‘information infrastructure’’ means the under-
lying framework, equipment, and software that an information 
system and related assets rely on to process, transmit, receive, 
or store information electronically. 
(3) The term ‘‘national security system’’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44, United States 
Code. 
SEC. 932. STRATEGY ON COMPUTER SOFTWARE ASSURANCE. 
(a) STRATEGY
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
develop and implement, by not later than October 1, 2011, a strategy 
for assuring the security of software and software-based applications 
for all covered systems. 
(b) COVERED SYSTEMS.—For purposes of this section, a covered 
system is any critical information system or weapon system of 
the Department of Defense, including the following: 
(1) A major system, as that term is defined in section 
2302(5) of title 10, United States Code. 
(2) A national security system, as that term is defined 
in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44, United States Code. 
(3) Any Department of Defense information system cat-
egorized as Mission Assurance Category I. 
(4) Any Department of Defense information system cat-
egorized as Mission Assurance Category II in accordance with 
Department of Defense Directive 8500.01E. 
(c) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) Policy and regulations on the following: 
(A) Software assurance generally. 
(B) Contract requirements for software assurance for 
covered systems in development and production. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2224 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00881
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4336 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) Inclusion of software assurance in milestone 
reviews and milestone approvals. 
(D) Rigorous test and evaluation of software assurance 
in development, acceptance, and operational tests. 
(E) Certification and accreditation requirements for 
software assurance for new systems and for updates for 
legacy systems, including mechanisms to monitor and 
enforce reciprocity of certification and accreditation proc-
esses among the military departments and Defense Agen-
cies. 
(F) Remediation in legacy systems of critical software 
assurance deficiencies that are defined as critical in accord-
ance with the Application Security Technical Implementa-
tion Guide of the Defense Information Systems Agency. 
(2) Allocation of adequate facilities and other resources 
for test and evaluation and certification and accreditation of 
software to meet applicable requirements for research and 
development, systems acquisition, and operations. 
(3) Mechanisms for protection against compromise of 
information systems through the supply chain or cyber attack 
by acquiring and improving automated tools for— 
(A) assuring the security of software and software 
applications during software development; 
(B) detecting vulnerabilities during testing of software; 
and 
(C) detecting intrusions during real-time monitoring 
of software applications. 
(4) Mechanisms providing the Department of Defense with 
the capabilities— 
(A) to monitor systems and applications in order to 
detect and defeat attempts to penetrate or disable such 
systems and applications; and 
(B) to ensure that such monitoring capabilities are 
integrated into the Department of Defense system of cyber 
defense-in-depth capabilities. 
(5) An update to Committee for National Security Systems 
Instruction No. 4009, entitled ‘‘National Information Assurance 
Glossary’’, to include a standard definition for software security 
assurance. 
(6) Either— 
(A) mechanisms to ensure that vulnerable Mission 
Assurance Category III information systems, if penetrated, 
cannot be used as a foundation for penetration of protected 
covered systems, and means for assessing the effectiveness 
of such mechanisms; or 
(B) plans to address critical vulnerabilities in Mission 
Assurance Category III information systems to prevent 
their use for intrusions of Mission Assurance Category 
I systems and Mission Assurance Category II systems. 
(7) A funding mechanism for remediation of critical soft-
ware assurance vulnerabilities in legacy systems. 
(d) REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report on the strategy required by subsection (a). The report 
shall include the following: 
(1) A description of the current status of the strategy 
required by subsection (a) and of the implementation of the 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00882
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4337 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
strategy, including a description of the role of the strategy 
in the risk management by the Department regarding the 
supply chain and in operational planning for cyber security. 
(2) A description of the risks, if any, that the Department 
will accept in the strategy due to limitations on funds or other 
applicable constraints. 
SEC. 933. STRATEGY FOR ACQUISITION AND OVERSIGHT OF DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE CYBER WARFARE CAPABILITIES. 
(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in con-
sultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall 
develop a strategy to provide for the rapid acquisition of tools, 
applications, and other capabilities for cyber warfare for the United 
States Cyber Command and the cyber operations components of 
the military departments. 
(b) BASIC ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection (a) 
shall include the following: 
(1) An orderly process for determining and approving oper-
ational requirements. 
(2) A well-defined, repeatable, transparent, and disciplined 
process for developing capabilities to meet such requirements, 
in accordance with the information technology acquisition 
process developed pursuant to section 804 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 
111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2225 note). 
(3) The allocation of facilities and other resources to thor-
oughly test such capabilities in development, before deployment, 
and before use in order to validate performance and take into 
account collateral damage and other so-called second-order 
effects. 
(c) ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by sub-
section (a) shall also provide for the following: 
(1) Safeguards to prevent— 
(A) the circumvention of operational requirements and 
acquisition processes through informal relationships among 
the United States Cyber Command, the Armed Forces, 
the National Security Agency, and the Defense Information 
Systems Agency; and 
(B) the abuse of quick-reaction processes otherwise 
available for the rapid fielding of capabilities. 
(2) The establishment of reporting and oversight processes 
for requirements generation and approval for cyber warfare 
capabilities, the assignment of responsibility for providing 
capabilities to meet such requirements, and the execution of 
development and deployment of such capabilities, under the 
authority of the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 
Council, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and other 
officials in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as designated 
in the strategy. 
(3) The establishment and maintenance of test and evalua-
tion facilities and resources for cyber infrastructure to support 
research and development, operational test and evaluation, 
operational planning and effects testing, and training by repli-
cating or emulating networks and infrastructure maintained 
and operated by the military and political organizations of 
potential United States adversaries, by domestic and foreign 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00883
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4338 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
telecommunications service providers, and by the Department 
of Defense. 
(4) An organization or organizations within the Department 
of Defense to be responsible for the operation and maintenance 
of cyber infrastructure for research, development, test, and 
evaluation purposes. 
(5) Appropriate disclosure regarding United States cyber 
warfare capabilities to the independent test and evaluation 
community, and the involvement of that community in the 
development and maintenance of such capabilities, regardless 
of classification. 
(6) The role of the private sector and appropriate Depart-
ment of Defense organizations in developing capabilities to 
operate in cyberspace, and a clear process for determining 
whether to allocate responsibility for responding to Department 
of Defense cyber warfare requirements through Federal Govern-
ment personnel, contracts with private sector entities, or a 
combination of both. 
(7) The roles of each military department, and of the combat 
support Defense Agencies, in the development of cyber warfare 
capabilities in support of offensive, defensive, and intelligence 
operational requirements. 
(8) Mechanisms to promote information sharing, coopera-
tive agreements, and collaboration with international, inter-
agency, academic, and industrial partners in the development 
of cyber warfare capabilities. 
(9) The manner in which the Department of Defense will 
promote interoperability, share innovation, and avoid unproduc-
tive duplication in cyber warfare capabilities through specializa-
tion among the components of the Department responsible for 
developing cyber capabilities. 
(d) REPORT ON STRATEGY.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 
on the strategy required by subsection (a). The report shall 
include a comprehensive description of the strategy and plans 
(including a schedule) for the implementation of the strategy. 
(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In 
this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 
means— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the Senate; and 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee 
on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 
SEC. 934. REPORT ON THE CYBER WARFARE POLICY OF THE DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the 
cyber warfare policy of the Department of Defense. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under this section shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the policy and legal issues investigated 
and evaluated by the Department in considering the range 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00884
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4339 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
of missions and activities that the Department may choose 
to conduct in cyberspace. 
(2) The decisions of the Secretary with respect to such 
issues, and the recommendations of the Secretary to the Presi-
dent for decisions on such of those issues as exceed the 
authority of the Secretary to resolve, together with the rationale 
and justification of the Secretary for such decisions and rec-
ommendations. 
(3) A description of the intentions of the Secretary with 
regard to modifying the National Military Strategy for Cyber-
space Operations. 
(4) The current use of, and potential applications of, mod-
eling and simulation tools to identify likely cybersecurity 
vulnerabilities, as well as new protective and remediation 
means, within the Department. 
(5) The application of modeling and simulation technology 
to develop strategies and programs to deter hostile or malicious 
activity intended to compromise Department information sys-
tems. 
(c) FORM.—The report required under this section shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
SEC. 935. REPORTS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRESS IN 
DEFENDING THE DEPARTMENT AND THE DEFENSE INDUS-
TRIAL BASE FROM CYBER EVENTS. 
(a) REPORTS ON PROGRESS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and March 1 every 
year thereafter through 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress 
of the Department of Defense in defending the Department and 
the defense industrial base from cyber events (such as attacks, 
intrusions, and theft). 
(b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include 
the following: 
(1) In the case of the first report, a baseline for measuring 
the progress of the Department of Defense in defending the 
Department and the defense industrial base from cyber events, 
including definitions of significant cyber events, an appropriate 
categorization of various types of cyber events, the basic 
methods used in various cyber events, the vulnerabilities 
exploited in such cyber events, and the metrics to be utilized 
to determine whether the Department is or is not making 
progress against an evolving cyber threat. 
(2) An ongoing assessment of such baseline against key 
cyber defense strategies (described in subsection (c)) to deter-
mine implementation progress. 
(3)(A) A description of the nature and scope of significant 
cyber events against the Department and the defense industrial 
base during the preceding year, including, for each such event, 
a description of the intelligence or other Department data 
acquired, the extent of the corruption or compromise of Depart-
ment information or weapon systems, and the impact of such 
event on the Department generally and on operational capabili-
ties. 
(B) For any such event that has been investigated by 
or on behalf of the Damage Assessment Management Office, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00885
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4340 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
a synopsis of each damage assessment report, with emphasis 
on actions needing remediation. 
(4) A comparative assessment of the offensive cyber warfare 
capabilities of current representative potential United States 
adversaries and nations with advanced cyber warfare capabili-
ties with the capacity of the United States to defend— 
(A) military networks and mission capabilities; and 
(B) critical infrastructure. 
(5) A comparative assessment of the offensive cyber warfare 
capabilities of the United States with the capacity of current 
representative potential United States adversaries and nations 
with advanced cyber warfare capabilities to defend against 
cyber attacks. 
(6) A comparative assessment of the degree of dependency 
of current representative potential United States adversaries, 
nations with advanced cyber warfare capabilities, and the 
United States on networks that can be attacked through cyber-
space. 
(7) A description of known or suspected identified supply 
chain vulnerabilities, including known or suspected supply 
chain attacks, and actions to remediate such vulnerabilities. 
(c) KEY CYBER DEFENSE STRATEGIES.—For purposes of sub-
section (b)(2), key cyber defense strategies include the following: 
(1) Relevant valid Homeland Security Presidential Direc-
tives and National Security Presidential Directives. 
(2) The Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative. 
(3) The National Military Strategy for Cyberspace Oper-
ations implementation plan. 
(d) PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN ASSESSMENTS.—The comparative 
assessment of critical infrastructure required by subsection (b)(4)(B) 
shall be performed by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in 
coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other 
agencies of the Government with specific responsibility for critical 
infrastructure. 
(e) FORM.—Each report under this section shall be submitted 
in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
Subtitle E—Other Matters 
SEC. 941. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TEM-
PORARY WAIVER OF REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF 
ACTIVITIES FOR NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL AT 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGIONAL CENTERS FOR 
SECURITY STUDIES. 
(a) EXTENSION OF WAIVER.—Paragraph (1) of section 941(b) 
of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4577; 10 U.S.C. 184 
note) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2009 and 2010’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2009 through 2012’’. 
(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Paragraph (3) of such section is amended 
by striking ‘‘in 2010 and 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘in each year through 
2013’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00886
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4341 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 942. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR QUADRENNIAL ROLES 
AND MISSIONS REVIEW IN 2011. 
(a) ADDITIONAL
ACTIVITIES
CONSIDERED.—As part of the 
quadrennial roles and missions review conducted in 2011 pursuant 
to section 118b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Defense shall give consideration to the following activities, giving 
particular attention to their role in counter-terrorism operations: 
(1) Information operations. 
(2) Detention and interrogation. 
(b) ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.—In the report required 
by section 118b(d) of such title for such review in 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense shall— 
(1) provide clear guidance on the nature and extent of 
which core competencies are associated with the activities listed 
in subsection (a); and 
(2) identify the elements of the Department of Defense 
that are responsible or should be responsible for providing 
such core competencies. 
SEC. 943. REPORT ON ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND POLICY 
GUIDANCE 
OF 
THE 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
REGARDING INFORMATION OPERATIONS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report 
on the organizational structure and policy guidance of the Depart-
ment of Defense with respect to information operations. 
(b) REVIEW.—In preparing the report required by subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall review the following: 
(1) The extent to which the current definition of ‘‘informa-
tion operations’’ in Department of Defense Directive 3600.1 
is appropriate. 
(2) The location of the office within the Department of 
the lead official responsible for information operations of the 
Department, including assessments of the most effective loca-
tion and the need to designate a principal staff assistant to 
the Secretary of Defense for information operations. 
(3) Departmental responsibility for the development, 
coordination, and oversight of Department policy on information 
operations and for the integration of such operations. 
(4) Departmental responsibility for the planning, execution, 
and oversight of Department information operations. 
(5) Departmental responsibility for coordination within the 
Department, and between the Department and other depart-
ments and agencies of the Federal Government, regarding 
Department information operations, and for the resolution of 
conflicts in the discharge of such operations, including an 
assessment of current coordination bodies and decisionmaking 
processes. 
(6) The roles and responsibilities of the military depart-
ments, combat support agencies, the United States Special 
Operations Command, and the other combatant commands in 
the development and implementation of information operations. 
(7) The roles and responsibilities of the defense intelligence 
agencies for support of information operations. 
10 USC 113 note. 
Guidance. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00887
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4342 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(8) The role in information operations of the following 
Department officials: 
(A) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public 
Affairs. 
(B) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special 
Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. 
(C) The senior official responsible for information proc-
essing and networking capabilities. 
(9) The role of related capabilities in the discharge of 
information operations, including public affairs capabilities, 
civil-military operations capabilities, defense support of public 
diplomacy, and intelligence. 
(10) The management structure of computer network oper-
ations in the Department for the discharge of information oper-
ations, and the policy in support of that component. 
(11) The appropriate use, management, and oversight of 
contractors in the development and implementation of informa-
tion operations, including an assessment of current guidance 
and policy directives pertaining to the uses of contractors for 
these purposes. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, with a classified annex, if necessary. 
(d) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVE.—Upon the submittal 
of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall prescribe 
a revised directive for the Department of Defense on information 
operations. The directive shall take into account the results of 
the review conducted for purposes of the report. 
(e) INFORMATION OPERATIONS DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘information operations’’ means the information operations 
specified in Department of Defense Directive 3600.1, as follows: 
(1) Electronic warfare. 
(2) Computer network operations. 
(3) Psychological operations. 
(4) Military deception. 
(5) Operations security. 
SEC. 944. REPORT ON ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES OF THE 
GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT COMMAND HEADQUARTERS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the 
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on 
the organizational structures of the headquarters of the geographic 
combatant commands. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the organizational structure of the 
headquarters of each geographic combatant command. 
(2) An assessment of the benefits and limitations of the 
different organizational structures in meeting the broad range 
of military missions of the geographic combatant commands. 
(3) A description and assessment of the role and contribu-
tions of other departments and agencies of the Federal Govern-
ment within each organizational structure, including a descrip-
tion of any plans to expand interagency participation in the 
geographic combatant commands in the future. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00888
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4343 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) A description of any lessons learned from the ongoing 
reorganization of the organizational structure of the United 
States Southern Command and the United States Africa Com-
mand, including an assessment of the value, if any, added 
by the position of civilian deputy to the commander of the 
United States Southern Command and to the commander of 
the United States Africa Command. 
(5) Any other matters the Secretary and the Chairman 
consider appropriate. 
TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Financial Matters 
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 
Sec. 1002. Authorization of additional appropriations for operations in Afghanistan, 
Iraq, and Haiti for fiscal year 2010. 
Sec. 1003. Budgetary effects of this Act. 
Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 
Sec. 1011. Unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 
Sec. 1012. Extension and modification of joint task forces support to law enforce-
ment agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 
Sec. 1013. Reporting requirement on expenditures to support foreign counter-drug 
activities. 
Sec. 1014. Support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 
Sec. 1015. Notice to Congress on military construction projects for facilities of the 
Department of Defense and foreign law enforcement agencies for 
counter-drug activities. 
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 
Sec. 1021. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy 
mess operations. 
Sec. 1022. Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the naming of a naval com-
bat vessel after Father Vincent Capodanno. 
Sec. 1023. Requirements for long-range plan for construction of naval vessels. 
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 
Sec. 1031. Extension of certain authority for making rewards for combating ter-
rorism. 
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 
detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
Sec. 1033. Certification requirements relating to the transfer of individuals de-
tained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries 
and other foreign entities. 
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in the 
United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval 
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
Sec. 1035. Comprehensive review of force protection policies. 
Subtitle E—Homeland Defense and Civil Support 
Sec. 1041. Limitation on deactivation of existing Consequence Management Re-
sponse Forces. 
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports 
Sec. 1051. Interagency national security knowledge and skills. 
Sec. 1052. Report on establishing a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. 
Sec. 1053. Comptroller General report on previously requested reports. 
Sec. 1054. Biennial report on nuclear triad. 
Sec. 1055. Comptroller General study on common alignment of world regions in de-
partments and agencies with international responsibilities. 
Sec. 1056. Required reports concerning bomber modernization, sustainment, and 
recapitalization efforts in support of the national defense strategy. 
Sec. 1057. Comptroller General study and recommendations regarding security of 
southern land border of the United States. 
Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 
Sec. 1061. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00889
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4344 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1062. Prohibition on infringing on the individual right to lawfully acquire, pos-
sess, own, carry, and otherwise use privately owned firearms, ammuni-
tion, and other weapons. 
Sec. 1063. Development of criteria and methodology for determining the safety and 
security of nuclear weapons. 
Subtitle H—Other Matters 
Sec. 1071. National Defense Panel. 
Sec. 1072. Sale of surplus military equipment to State and local homeland security 
and emergency management agencies. 
Sec. 1073. Defense research and development rapid innovation program. 
Sec. 1074. Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic emer-
gency assistance. 
Sec. 1075. Technical and clerical amendments. 
Sec. 1076. Study on optimal balance of manned and remotely piloted aircraft. 
Sec. 1077. Treatment of successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Free-
dom. 
Sec. 1078. Program to assess the utility of non-lethal weapons. 
Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress on strategic nuclear force reductions. 
Subtitle A—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 
Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 
the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 
available to the Department of Defense in this division for 
fiscal year 2011 between any such authorizations for that fiscal 
year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations 
so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 
same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 
total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer 
under 
the 
authority 
of 
this 
section 
may 
not 
exceed 
$4,000,000,000. 
(3) EXCEPTION
FOR
TRANSFERS
BETWEEN
MILITARY
PER-
SONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military 
personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted 
toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). 
(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by this section to 
transfer authorizations— 
(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that 
have a higher priority than the items from which authority 
is transferred; and 
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that 
has been denied authorization by Congress. 
(c) EFFECT
ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made 
from one account to another under the authority of this section 
shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account 
to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the 
amount transferred. 
(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall promptly notify 
Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 
SEC. 1002. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, AND HAITI FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2010. 
In addition to the amounts otherwise authorized to be appro-
priated by this division, the amounts authorized to be appropriated 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00890
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4345 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
for fiscal year 2010 in title XV of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84) are hereby increased, 
with respect to any such authorized amount, as follows: 
(1) The amounts provided in sections 1502 through 1507 
of such Act for the following procurement accounts are increased 
as follows: 
(A) For aircraft procurement, Army, by $182,170,000. 
(B) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles procure-
ment, Army, by $3,000,000. 
(C) 
For 
ammunition 
procurement, 
Army, 
by 
$17,055,000. 
(D) For other procurement, Army, by $1,997,918,000. 
(E) For the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat 
Fund, by $400,000,000. 
(F) For aircraft procurement, Navy, by $104,693,000. 
(G) For other procurement, Navy, by $15,000,000. 
(H) For procurement, Marine Corps, by $18,927,000. 
(I) 
For 
aircraft 
procurement, 
Air 
Force, 
by 
$209,766,000. 
(J) For ammunition procurement, Air Force, by 
$5,000,000. 
(K) For other procurement, Air Force, by $576,895,000. 
(L) For the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle 
Fund, by $1,123,000,000. 
(M) For defense-wide activities, by $189,276,000. 
(2) The amounts provided in section 1508 of such Act 
for research, development, test, and evaluation are increased 
as follows: 
(A) For the Army, by $61,962,000. 
(B) For the Navy, by $5,360,000. 
(C) For the Air Force, by $187,651,000. 
(D) For defense-wide activities, by $22,138,000. 
(3) The amounts provided in sections 1509, 1511, 1513, 
1514, and 1515 of such Act for operation and maintenance 
are increased as follows: 
(A) For the Army, by $11,700,965,000. 
(B) For the Navy, by $2,428,702,000. 
(C) For the Marine Corps, by $1,090,873,000. 
(D) For the Air Force, by $3,845,047,000. 
(E) For defense-wide activities, by $1,188,421,000. 
(F) For the Army Reserve, by $67,399,000. 
(G) For the Navy Reserve, by $61,842,000. 
(H) For the Marine Corps Reserve, by $674,000. 
(I) For the Air Force Reserve, by $95,819,000. 
(J) For the Army National Guard, by $171,834,000. 
(K) For the Air National Guard, by $161,281,000. 
(L) For the Defense Health Program, by $33,367,000. 
(M) For Drug Interdiction and Counterdrug Activities, 
Defense-wide, by $94,000,000. 
(N) For the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, by 
$2,604,000,000. 
(O) 
For 
the 
Iraq 
Security 
Forces 
Fund, 
by 
$1,000,000,000. 
(P) For Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic 
Aid, by $255,000,000. 
(Q) For Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer 
Fund, by $350,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00891
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4346 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(R) For Working Capital Funds, by $974,967,000. 
(4) The amount provided in section 1512 of such Act for 
military personnel accounts is increased by $1,895,761,000. 
SEC. 1003. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 
by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 
PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 
Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the 
Budget of the House of Representatives, as long as such statement 
has been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 
Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 
SEC. 1011. UNIFIED COUNTER-DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAM-
PAIGN IN COLOMBIA. 
Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 
Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2441), is further amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘2011’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘2011’’. 
SEC. 1012. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF JOINT TASK FORCES 
SUPPORT 
TO 
LAW 
ENFORCEMENT 
AGENCIES 
CON-
DUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (b) of section 1022 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 
note) is amended by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 
(b) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY.— 
(1) ADDITIONAL CONDITION ON AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT AND 
ASSOCIATED WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Subsection (d) of such section 
is amended— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Any support’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2)(A) Support for counter-terrorism activities provided under 
subsection (a) may only be provided if the Secretary of Defense 
determines that the objectives of using the counter-drug funds 
of any joint task force to provide such support relate significantly 
to the objectives of providing support for counter-drug activities 
by that joint task force or any other joint task force. 
‘‘(B) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirements 
of subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver 
is vital to the national security interests of the United States. 
The Secretary shall promptly submit to Congress notice in writing 
of any waiver issued under this subparagraph. 
‘‘(C) The Secretary of Defense may delegate any responsibility 
of the Secretary under subparagraph (B) to the Deputy Secretary 
of Defense or to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Except 
as provided in the preceding sentence, such a responsibility may 
not be delegated to any official of the Department of Defense or 
any other official.’’. 
Notice. 
Waiver authority. 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00892
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4347 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE.—Subsection (c) 
of such section is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(4) A certification by the Secretary of Defense that any 
support provided under subsection (a) during such one-year 
period was provided in compliance with the requirements of 
subsection (d).’’. 
(3) INTERIM COMPLIANCE REPORT.—Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth— 
(A) a description of each support activity provided by 
a joint task force under subsection (a) of section 1022 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 note), as of the date of the submittal 
of such report; and 
(B) a certification as to whether or not each such 
activity has been provided in compliance with the require-
ments of subsection (d) of such section, as amended by 
paragraph (1) of this subsection. 
SEC. 1013. REPORTING REQUIREMENT ON EXPENDITURES TO SUP-
PORT FOREIGN COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES. 
Section 1022(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by 
Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–255), as most recently 
amended by section 1013 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2442), 
is further amended by striking ‘‘February 15, 2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘February 15, 2011’’. 
SEC. 1014. SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES OF CERTAIN 
FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public 
Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 
1014(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2442), is further amended 
by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 
(b) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SUPPORT.—Subsection (e)(2) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘either of fiscal years 2009 and 
2010’’ and inserting ‘‘any of the fiscal years 2009 through 2012’’. 
SEC. 1015. NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS FOR FACILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE AND FOREIGN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 
FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES. 
(a) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) NOTICE.—Section 1004 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) 
is amended— 
(A) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting ‘‘for the purpose 
of facilitating’’ after ‘‘within or outside the United States 
or’’; and 
(B) in subsection (h)(2)(A)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘modification or repair’’ and 
inserting ‘‘construction, modification, or repair’’; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘a Department of Defense facility’’ 
and inserting ‘‘any facility’’; and 
10 USC 371. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00893
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4348 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(iii) by striking ‘‘purpose’’ and inserting ‘‘purposes’’. 
(2) CONSTRUCTION OF NOTICE.—Subsection (h) of such sec-
tion is further amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) This subsection may not be construed as an authorization 
for the use of funds for any military construction project that 
would exceed the approved cost limitations of an unspecified minor 
military construction project under section 2805(a)(2) of title 10, 
United States Code.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 
(a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and shall apply with respect to facilities projects for which a decision 
is made to be carried out on or after that date. 
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 
SEC. 1021. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF 
EXPENSES FOR CERTAIN NAVY MESS OPERATIONS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the Duncan 
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4585) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 
(b) CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) 
of such section is amended by inserting ‘‘in any fiscal year’’ after 
‘‘may be used’’. 
SEC. 1022. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE 
NAMING OF A NAVAL COMBAT VESSEL AFTER FATHER 
VINCENT CAPODANNO. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) Father Vincent Capodanno was born on February 13, 
1929, in Staten Island, New York. 
(2) After attending Fordham University for a year, he 
entered the Maryknoll Missionary Seminary in upstate New 
York in 1949, and was ordained a Catholic priest in June 
1957. 
(3) Father Capodanno’s first assignment as a missionary 
was working with aboriginal Taiwanese people in the moun-
tains of Taiwan where he served in a parish and later in 
a school. After several years, Father Capodanno returned to 
the United States for leave and then was assigned to a 
Maryknoll school in Hong Kong. 
(4) Father Vincent Capodanno volunteered as a Navy Chap-
lain and was commissioned a Lieutenant in the Chaplain Corps 
of the United States Naval Reserve in December 28, 1965. 
(5) Father Vincent Capodanno selflessly extended his com-
bat tour in Vietnam on the condition he was allowed to remain 
with the infantry. 
(6) On September 4, 1967, during a fierce battle in the 
Thang Binh District of the Que-Son Valley in Vietnam, Father 
Capodanno went among the wounded and dying, giving last 
rites and caring for the injured. He was killed that day while 
taking care of his Marines. 
(7) On January 7, 1969, Father Vincent Capodanno was 
awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously for comforting the 
10 USC 374 note. 
10 USC 374 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00894
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4349 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
wounded and dying during the Vietnam conflict. For his dedi-
cated service, Father Capodanno was also awarded the Bronze 
Star, the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the 
National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, 
the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Vietnam 
Campaign Medal. 
(8) In his memory, the U.S.S. Capodanno was commissioned 
on September 17, 1973. It is the only Naval vessel to date 
to have received a Papal blessing by Pope John Paul II in 
Naples, Italy, on September 4, 1981. 
(9) The U.S.S. Capodanno was decommissioned on July 
30, 1993. 
(b) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Secretary of the Navy should name a combat vessel of the 
United States Navy the ‘‘U.S.S. Father Vincent Capodanno’’, in 
honor of Father Vincent Capodanno, a lieutenant in the Navy 
Chaplain Corps. 
SEC. 1023. REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-RANGE PLAN FOR CONSTRUC-
TION OF NAVAL VESSELS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 231 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 231. Long-range plan for construction of naval vessels 
‘‘(a) QUADRENNIAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN.—At the 
same time that the budget of the President is submitted under 
section 1105(a) of title 31 during each year in which the Secretary 
of Defense submits a quadrennial defense review, the Secretary 
of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a long-range plan for the construction of combatant and support 
vessels for the Navy that supports the force structure recommenda-
tions of the quadrennial defense review. 
‘‘(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
‘‘(1) A detailed construction schedule of naval vessels for 
the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the plan 
is submitted, including a certification by the Secretary that 
the budget for the fiscal year in which the plan is submitted 
and the budget for the future-years defense program submitted 
under section 221 of this title are sufficient for funding such 
schedule. 
‘‘(2) A probable construction schedule for the 10-year period 
beginning on the date that is 10 years after the date on which 
the plan is submitted. 
‘‘(3) A notional construction schedule for the 10-year period 
beginning on the date that is 20 years after the date on which 
the plan is submitted. 
‘‘(4) The estimated levels of annual funding necessary to 
carry out the construction schedules under paragraphs (1), (2), 
and (3). 
‘‘(5) For the construction schedules under paragraphs (1) 
and (2)— 
‘‘(A) a determination by the Director of Cost Assess-
ment and Program Evaluation of the level of funding nec-
essary to execute such schedules; and 
‘‘(B) an evaluation by the Director of the potential 
risk associated with such schedules, including detailed 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00895
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4350 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
effects on operational plans, missions, deployment sched-
ules, and fulfillment of the requirements of the combatant 
commanders. 
‘‘(c) NAVAL COMPOSITION.—In submitting the plan under sub-
section (a), the Secretary shall ensure that such plan is in accord-
ance with section 5062(b) of this title. 
‘‘(d) ASSESSMENT
WHEN
BUDGET
IS
INSUFFICIENT.—If the 
budget for a fiscal year provides for funding of the construction 
of naval vessels at a level that is less than the level determined 
necessary by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evalua-
tion under subsection (b)(5), the Secretary of the Navy shall include 
with the defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment 
that describes and discusses the risks associated with the budget, 
including the risk associated with a reduced force structure that 
may result from funding naval vessel construction at such a level. 
‘‘(e) CBO EVALUATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date 
on which the congressional defense committees receive the plan 
under subsection (a), the Director of the Congressional Budget 
Office shall submit to such committees a report assessing the suffi-
ciency of the estimated levels of annual funding included in such 
plan with respect to the budget submitted during the year in 
which the plan is submitted and the future-years defense program 
submitted under section 221 of this title. 
‘‘(f) CHANGES TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN.—In any year in 
which a quadrennial defense review is not submitted and the budget 
of the President submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 
decreases the number of vessels requested in the future-years 
defense program submitted under section 221 of this title, the 
Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report on such decrease including— 
‘‘(1) an addendum to the most recent quadrennial defense 
review that fully explains and justifies the decrease with respect 
to the national security strategy of the United States as set 
forth in the most recent national security strategy report of 
the President under section 108 of the National Security Act 
of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a); and 
‘‘(2) a description of the additional reviews and analyses 
considered by the Secretary after the previous quadrennial 
defense review was submitted that justify the decrease. 
‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘budget’, with respect to a fiscal year, means 
the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress 
by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘defense budget materials’, with respect to 
a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by 
the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that 
fiscal year. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘quadrennial defense review’ means the 
review of the defense programs and policies of the United 
States that is carried out every four years under section 118 
of this title.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 9 of such title is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘231. Long-range plan for construction of naval vessels.’’. 
Reports. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00896
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4351 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 
SEC. 
1031. 
EXTENSION 
OF 
CERTAIN 
AUTHORITY 
FOR 
MAKING 
REWARDS FOR COMBATING TERRORISM. 
Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 
SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 
OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 
STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
for fiscal year 2011 may be used to transfer, release, or assist 
in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its terri-
tories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other 
detainee who— 
(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the 
Armed Forces of the United States; and 
(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
SEC. 
1033. 
CERTIFICATION 
REQUIREMENTS 
RELATING 
TO 
THE 
TRANSFER OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT NAVAL STA-
TION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES 
AND OTHER FOREIGN ENTITIES. 
(a) LIMITATION.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not use any 
of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 
otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer 
any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or effec-
tive control of the individual’s country of origin, any other 
foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary 
submits to Congress the certification described in subsection 
(b) by not later than 30 days before the transfer of the indi-
vidual. 
(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action 
taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained 
at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition 
of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal 
of the United States having lawful jurisdiction. The Secretary 
shall notify Congress promptly upon issuance of any such order. 
(b) CERTIFICATION.—The certification described in this sub-
section is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, 
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, that the government 
of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign 
entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be 
transferred— 
(1) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a 
designated foreign terrorist organization; 
(2) maintains effective control over each detention facility 
in which an individual is to be detained if the individual is 
to be housed in a detention facility; 
(3) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a 
threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise 
control over the individual; 
Notification. 
Time period. 
Deadline. 
Khalid Sheikh 
Mohammed. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00897
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4352 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) has agreed to take effective steps to ensure that the 
individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, 
its citizens, or its allies in the future; 
(5) has taken such steps as the Secretary determines are 
necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or re- 
engage in any terrorist activity; and 
(6) has agreed to share any information with the United 
States that— 
(A) is related to the individual or any associates of 
the individual; and 
(B) could affect the security of the United States, its 
citizens, or its allies. 
(c) PROHIBITION AND WAIVER IN CASES OF PRIOR CONFIRMED 
RECIDIVISM.— 
(1) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), 
during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not use any 
amount authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made avail-
able to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual 
detained at Guantanamo to the custody or effective control 
of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, 
or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of 
any individual who was detained at United States Naval Sta-
tion, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 
11, 2001, who was transferred to the foreign country or entity 
and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity. 
(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the 
prohibition in paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that 
such a transfer is in the national security interests of the 
United States and includes, as part of the certification described 
in subsection (b) relating to such transfer, the determination 
of the Secretary under this paragraph. 
(3) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action 
taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained 
at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition 
of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal 
of the United States having lawful jurisdiction. The Secretary 
shall notify Congress promptly upon issuance of any such order. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ means 
any individual who is located at United States Naval Station, 
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— 
(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member 
of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 
(B) is— 
(i) in the custody or under the effective control 
of the Department of Defense; or 
(ii) otherwise under detention at United States 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
(2) The term ‘‘foreign terrorist organization’’ means any 
organization so designated by the Secretary of State under 
section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1189). 
Notification. 
Determination. 
Time period. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00898
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4353 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS TO MODIFY OR CON-
STRUCT FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE 
DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated by this Act may be used to construct or modify any facility 
in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any 
individual described in subsection (c) for the purposes of detention 
or imprisonment in the custody or under the effective control of 
the Department of Defense. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not 
apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Sta-
tion, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
(c) INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED.—An individual described in this 
subsection is any individual who, as of October 1, 2009, is located 
at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and who— 
(1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member 
of the Armed Forces of the United States; and 
(2) is— 
(A) in the custody or under the effective control of 
the Department of Defense; or 
(B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval 
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 
(d) REPORT ON USE OF FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO 
HOUSE DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM GUANTANAMO.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2011, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report, in classified or unclassified form, on the 
merits, costs, and risks of using any proposed facility in the 
United States, its territories, or possessions to house any indi-
vidual described in subsection (c) for the purposes of detention 
or imprisonment in the custody or under the effective control 
of the Department of Defense. 
(2) ELEMENTS
OF
THE
REPORT.—The report required in 
paragraph (1) shall include each of the following: 
(A) A discussion of the merits associated with any 
such proposed facility that would justify— 
(i) using the facility instead of the facility at United 
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and 
(ii) the proposed facility’s contribution to effecting 
a comprehensive policy for continuing military deten-
tion operations. 
(B) The rationale for selecting the specific site for 
any such proposed facility, including details for the proc-
esses and criteria used for identifying the merits described 
in subparagraph (A) and for selecting the proposed site 
over reasonable alternative sites. 
(C) A discussion of any potential risks to any commu-
nity in the vicinity of any such proposed facility, the meas-
ures that could be taken to mitigate such risks, and the 
likely cost to the Department of Defense of implementing 
such measures. 
(D) A discussion of any necessary modifications to any 
such proposed facility to ensure that any detainee trans-
ferred from Guantanamo Bay to such facility could not 
come into contact with any other individual, including any 
other person detained at such facility, that is not approved 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00899
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4354 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
for such contact by the Department of Defense, and an 
assessment of the likely costs of such modifications. 
(E) A discussion of any support at the site of any 
such proposed facility that would likely be provided by 
the Department of Defense, including the types of support, 
the number of personnel required for each such type, and 
an estimate of the cost of such support. 
(F) A discussion of any support, other than support 
provided at a proposed facility, that would likely be pro-
vided by the Department of Defense for the operation of 
any such proposed facility, including the types of possible 
support, the number of personnel required for each such 
type, and an estimate of the cost of such support. 
(G) A discussion of the legal issues, in the judgment 
of the Secretary of Defense, that could be raised as a 
result of detaining or imprisoning any individual described 
in subsection (c) at any such proposed facility that could 
not be raised while such individual is detained or impris-
oned at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 
Cuba. 
SEC. 1035. COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF FORCE PROTECTION POLI-
CIES. 
(a) COMPREHENSIVE
REVIEW
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall conduct a comprehensive review of Department of 
Defense policies, regulations, instructions, and directives pertaining 
to force protection within the Department. 
(b) MATTERS COVERED.—The review required under subsection 
(a) shall include an assessment of each of the following: 
(1) Information sharing practices across the Department 
of Defense, and among the State, local, and Federal partners 
of the Department of Defense. 
(2) Antiterrorism and force protection standards relating 
to buildings, including standoff distances. 
(3) Protective standards relating to chemical, biological, 
radiological, nuclear, and high explosives threats. 
(4) Standards relating to access to Department bases. 
(5) Standards for identity management within the Depart-
ment, including such standards for identity cards and biometric 
identifications systems. 
(6) Procedures for validating and approving individuals 
with regular or episodic access to military installations, 
including military personnel, civilian employees, contractors, 
family members of personnel, and other types of visitors. 
(7) Procedures for sharing with appropriate Department 
of Defense officials with responsibility for force protection— 
(A) information from the intelligence or law enforce-
ment community regarding possible threats from terrorists 
or terrorist groups, criminal organizations, or other state 
and non-state foreign entities actively working to under-
mine the security interests of the United States; and 
(B) information regarding personnel who have engaged 
in potentially suspicious activities or may otherwise pose 
a threat. 
(8) Any legislative changes recommended for implementing 
the recommendations contained in the review. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00900
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4355 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(c) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than September 1, 2012, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit an interim report on the com-
prehensive review required under subsection (a). 
(d) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2013, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the Senate and House of Representatives a final report on the 
comprehensive review required under subsection (a). The final 
report shall include such findings and recommendations as the 
Secretary considers appropriate based on the review, including rec-
ommended actions to be taken to implement the specific rec-
ommendations in the final report. The final report shall be sub-
mitted in an unclassified format, but may include a classified annex. 
Subtitle E—Homeland Defense and Civil 
Support 
SEC. 
1041. 
LIMITATION 
ON 
DEACTIVATION 
OF 
EXISTING 
CON-
SEQUENCE MANAGEMENT RESPONSE FORCES. 
(a) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 
no Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, or High-Yield Explo-
sive Consequence Management Response Force established as of 
October 1, 2009, is deactivated or disestablished until the Secretary 
provides a certification described in subsection (b). 
(b) CERTIFICATION.—The certification described in this sub-
section is a written certification to the congressional defense 
committees that there exists within the United States Armed Forces 
an alternative chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high- 
yield explosive consequence management response capability that 
is at least as capable as two Chemical, Biological, Radiological, 
Nuclear, or High-Yield Explosive Consequence Management 
Response Forces. 
(c) REPORT REQUIRED.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report on plans of the 
Department of Defense to establish Homeland Response Forces 
for domestic emergency response to incidents involving weapons 
of mass destruction. 
(2) ELEMENTS
OF
REPORT.—The report required by this 
subsection shall include the following: 
(A) A detailed description of the analysis that led to 
the decision to establish Homeland Response Forces 
described in paragraph (1), including— 
(i) whether consideration was given to establishing 
Homeland Response Forces within the Reserves; and 
(ii) the reasons for not planning to establish any 
Homeland Response Forces within the Reserves. 
(B) A detailed description of the plans to establish 
Homeland Response Forces, including— 
(i) the cost and schedule to establish, equip, main-
tain, and operate the proposed Homeland Response 
Forces; 
(ii) guidelines for the employment of Homeland 
Response Forces; and 
(iii) the portion of the costs of Homeland Response 
Forces that will be borne by the States. 
Certification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00901
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4356 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) A detailed description of the proposed number and 
composition of Homeland Response Forces, including— 
(i) the number and type of units in each Homeland 
Response Force; and 
(ii) the number of personnel in each Homeland 
Response Force. 
(D) A comparative assessment of the emergency 
response capabilities of a Homeland Response Force with 
the capabilities of a Chemical, Biological, Radiological, 
Nuclear, or High-Yield Explosive Consequence Manage-
ment Response Force, including— 
(i) a comparison of the equipment proposed for 
each type of force; 
(ii) a comparison of the proposed means of 
transportation for each type of force; 
(iii) an estimate of the time it would take each 
type of force to deploy to an incident site; and 
(iv) an estimate of the operational duration of each 
type of force at such a site. 
(E) A description of the command and control arrange-
ments proposed for the Homeland Response Forces, 
including a description of the degree to which the Homeland 
Response Forces would be subject to the direction and 
control of the Department of Defense, as compared to the 
Governor of the State in which they are located. 
(F) The results of the United States Northern Com-
mand study of the possible concepts of operations and 
of the implementation of the Homeland Response Force 
plan in such a manner as to provide adequate capability 
to provide Federal defense support to civil authorities 
during domestic incidents involving weapons of mass 
destruction. 
(G) Any other matters the Secretary considers appro-
priate. 
(3) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by this sub-
section shall be in unclassified form, but may include a classi-
fied annex. 
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports 
SEC. 1051. INTERAGENCY NATIONAL SECURITY KNOWLEDGE AND 
SKILLS. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.— 
(1) SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT STUDY ORGANIZATION.—Not 
later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall select and enter into an 
agreement 
with 
an 
appropriate 
independent, 
nonprofit 
organization to conduct a study of the matters described in 
subsection (b). 
(2) QUALIFICATIONS
OF
ORGANIZATION
SELECTED.—The 
organization selected shall be qualified on the basis of having 
relevant expertise in the fields of national security and human 
capital development, and on the basis of such other criteria 
as the Secretary of Defense may determine. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE COVERED.—The study required by sub-
section (a) shall assess the current state of interagency national 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
Deadline. 
Contracts. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00902
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4357 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
security knowledge and skills in Department of Defense civilian 
and military personnel, and make recommendations for strength-
ening such knowledge and skills. At minimum, the study shall 
include assessments and recommendations on— 
(1) interagency national security training, education, and 
rotational assignment opportunities available to civilians and 
military personnel; 
(2) integration of interagency national security education 
into the professional military education system; 
(3) levels of interagency national security knowledge and 
skills possessed by personnel currently serving in civilian execu-
tive and general or flag officer positions, as represented by 
the interagency education, training, and professional experi-
ences they have undertaken; 
(4) incentives that enable and encourage military and 
civilian personnel to undertake interagency assignment, edu-
cation, and training opportunities, as well as disincentives and 
obstacles that discourage undertaking such opportunities; and 
(5) any plans or current efforts to improve the interagency 
national security knowledge and skills of civilian and military 
personnel. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than December 1, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report containing the findings and recommendations from the 
study required by subsection (a). 
(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘interagency national 
security knowledge and skills’’ means an understanding of, and 
the ability to efficiently and expeditiously work within, the struc-
tures, mechanisms, and processes by which the departments, agen-
cies, and elements of the Federal Government that have national 
security missions coordinate and integrate their policies, capabili-
ties, budgets, expertise, and activities to accomplish such missions. 
SEC. 1052. REPORT ON ESTABLISHING A NORTHEAST REGIONAL JOINT 
TRAINING CENTER. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the need for 
the establishment of a Northeast Regional Joint Training Center. 
(b) CONTENTS
OF REPORT.—The report required under sub-
section (a) shall include each of the following: 
(1) A list of facilities in the Northeastern United States 
at which, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Department of Defense has deployed or has committed to 
deploying joint training. 
(2) A description of the extent to which such facilities 
have sufficient unused capacity and expertise to accommodate 
and fully utilize joint training. 
(3) A list of potential locations for the Northeast Regional 
Joint Training Center discussed in the report. 
(c) CONSIDERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO LOCATION.—In deter-
mining potential locations for the Northeast Regional Joint Training 
Center to be discussed in the report required under subsection 
(a), the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration Depart-
ment of Defense facilities that have— 
(1) a workforce of skilled personnel; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00903
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4358 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) live, virtual, and constructive training capabilities, and 
the ability to digitally connect them and the associated battle 
command structure at the tactical and operational levels; 
(3) an extensive deployment history in Operation Enduring 
Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom; 
(4) a location in the Northeastern United States; 
(5) the capacity or potential capacity to accommodate a 
target training audience range of 500 to 4,000 additional per-
sonnel; and 
(6) the capability to accommodate the training of current 
and future joint forces. 
SEC. 
1053. 
COMPTROLLER 
GENERAL 
REPORT 
ON 
PREVIOUSLY 
REQUESTED REPORTS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2011, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on 
Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report evaluating 
the sufficiency, adequacy, and conclusions of the following reports: 
(1) The report on Air Force fighter force shortfalls, as 
required by the report of the House of Representatives num-
bered 111–166, which accompanied the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). 
(2) The report on procurement of 4.5 generation fighters, 
as required by section 131 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2218). 
(3) The report on combat air forces restructuring, as 
required by the report of the House of Representatives num-
bered 111–288, which accompanied the conference report for 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84). 
(b) MATTERS COVERED
BY REPORT.—The report required by 
subsection (a) shall examine the potential costs and benefits of 
each of the following: 
(1) The service life extension program costs to sustain 
the legacy fighter fleet to meet inventory requirements with 
an emphasis on the service life extension program compared 
to other options such as procurement of 4.5 generation fighters. 
(2) The Falcon Structural Augmentation Roadmap of F– 
16s, with emphasis on the cost-benefit of such effort and the 
effect of such efforts on the service life of the airframes. 
(3) Any additional programs designed to extend the service 
life of legacy fighter aircraft. 
(c) PROHIBITION.—No fighter aircraft may be retired from the 
Air Force or the Air National Guard inventory in fiscal year 2011 
until the date that is 90 days after the date on which the Committee 
on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed 
Services of the House of Representatives receive the report required 
under subsection (a). 
SEC. 1054. BIENNIAL REPORT ON NUCLEAR TRIAD. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than March 1 of each even-numbered 
year, beginning March 1, 2012, the Secretary of Defense, in con-
sultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security, shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the nuclear 
triad. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 113 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00904
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4359 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A detailed discussion of the modernization and 
sustainment plans for each component of the nuclear triad 
over the 10-year period beginning on the date of the report. 
(2) The funding required for each platform of the nuclear 
triad with respect to operation and maintenance, moderniza-
tion, and replacement. 
(3) Any industrial capacities that the Secretary considers 
vital to ensure the viability of the nuclear triad. 
(c) NUCLEAR TRIAD DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘nuclear 
triad’’ means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States 
composed of ballistic missile submarines, land-based missiles, and 
strategic bombers. 
SEC. 1055. COMPTROLLER GENERAL STUDY ON COMMON ALIGNMENT 
OF WORLD REGIONS IN DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES 
WITH INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall conduct a study to assess the need for and implications 
of a common alignment of world regions in the internal organization 
of departments and agencies of the Federal Government with inter-
national responsibilities. 
(b) DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES.—The following departments 
and agencies, at a minimum, shall be included in the study: 
(1) The Department of State. 
(2) The Department of the Treasury. 
(3) The Department of Defense. 
(4) The Department of Justice. 
(5) The Department of Commerce. 
(6) The Department of Homeland Security. 
(7) The United States Agency for International Develop-
ment. 
(8) The agencies comprising the intelligence community. 
(9) Such other departments, agencies, and Federal 
organizations with significant international responsibilities as 
the Comptroller General considers appropriate. 
(c) COOPERATION AND ACCESS.—The heads of the departments 
and agencies included in the study shall provide full cooperation 
with, and access to appropriate information on organizational struc-
tures to, the Comptroller General for the purposes of conducting 
the study. 
(d) MATTERS COVERED.—The study required under subsection 
(a) shall, at a minimum, assess— 
(1) problems and inefficiencies resulting from lack of a 
common alignment, including impediments to interagency 
collaboration; 
(2) obstacles to implementing a common alignment; 
(3) advantages and disadvantages of a common alignment; 
and 
(4) measures taken to address challenges associated with 
the lack of a common alignment. 
(e) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit to Congress 
a report on the study required under subsection (a) not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00905
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4360 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1056. REQUIRED REPORTS CONCERNING BOMBER MODERNIZA-
TION, SUSTAINMENT, AND RECAPITALIZATION EFFORTS 
IN SUPPORT OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE STRATEGY. 
(a) AIR FORCE REPORT.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 360 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air 
Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report that includes— 
(A) a discussion of the cost, schedule, and performance 
of all planned efforts to modernize and keep viable the 
existing B–1, B–2, and B–52 bomber fleets and a discussion 
of the forecasted service-life and all sustainment challenges 
that the Secretary of the Air Force may confront in keeping 
those platforms viable until the anticipated retirement of 
such aircraft; 
(B) a discussion, presented in a comparison and con-
trast type format, of the scope of the 2007 Next-Generation 
Long Range Strike Analysis of Alternatives guidance and 
subsequent Analysis of Alternatives report tasked by the 
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 
and Logistics in the September 11, 2006, Acquisition Deci-
sion Memorandum, as compared to the scope and directed 
guidance of the year 2010 Long Range Strike Study effort 
currently being conducted by the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Policy and the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office; 
and 
(C) a discussion of the preliminary costs, any develop-
ment, testing, fielding and operational employment chal-
lenges, capability gaps, limitations, and shortfalls of the 
Secretary of Defense’s plan to field a long-range, pene-
trating, survivable, persistent and enduring ‘‘family of sys-
tems’’ as compared to the preliminary costs, any develop-
ment, testing, fielding, and operational employment of a 
singular platform that encompasses all the required afore-
mentioned characteristics. 
(2) PREPARATION OF REPORT.—The report under paragraph 
(1) shall be prepared by a federally funded research and 
development center selected by the Secretary of the Air Force 
and submitted to the Secretary for submittal by the Secretary 
in accordance with that paragraph. 
(b) COST ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT.—Not 
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Director of the Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation of the 
Office of the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report that includes— 
(1) the assumptions and estimated life-cycle costs of the 
Department’s long-range, penetrating, survivable, persistent, 
and enduring ‘‘family of systems’’ platforms; and 
(2) the assumptions and estimated life-cycle costs of the 
Next Generation Platform program, as planned, prior to the 
cancellation of the program on April 6, 2009. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00906
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4361 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1057. COMPTROLLER GENERAL STUDY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
REGARDING SECURITY OF SOUTHERN LAND BORDER OF 
THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) STUDY AND REPORT REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General 
of the United States shall conduct a study of the security of the 
southern land border of the United States and ongoing United 
States Government efforts to improve such security. Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 
General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 
the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing 
the findings of the study and such recommendations based on 
such findings as the Comptroller General considers to be appro-
priate. 
(b) ISSUES ADDRESSED.—The study and report required by sub-
section (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following issues: 
(1) The extent to which the United States has or has 
not achieved and maintained operational control over the 
southern land border of the United States, as defined in section 
2(b) of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–367; 
8 U.S.C. 1701 note). 
(2) The extent to which any lack of operational control 
over the southern land border of the United States has resulted 
in the operation of illicit networks trafficking in people, drugs, 
illegal weapons and money, violence associated with such illegal 
activities, and other impacts adverse to the interests of the 
United States. 
(3) The costs and benefits of steps, including but not limited 
to the steps identified in subsection (c), that could be taken 
by elements of the United States Government to achieve oper-
ational control over the southern land border of the United 
States. 
(4) The costs and benefits of an increased role for the 
Department of Defense in taking any such steps. 
(5) The adequacy of current information sharing agree-
ments and other related agreements between Federal, State, 
local, and tribal law enforcement authorities with regard to 
the security of the southern land border of the United States. 
(6) The impact of any increased deployment of unmanned 
aerial systems or unmanned aircraft on the use and availability 
of the National Airspace in the area of the southern land 
border of the United States. 
(c) SPECIFIC STEPS TO BE CONSIDERED.—The steps to be consid-
ered by the Comptroller General pursuant to paragraphs (3) and 
(4) of subsection (b) shall include the following: 
(1) The deployment of additional units or members of the 
National Guard or other Department of Defense personnel to 
the southern land border of the United States. 
(2) The commitment of additional border patrol agents 
or other civilian law enforcement personnel to the southern 
land border of the United States. 
(3) The construction of additional fencing, including double- 
layer and triple-layer fencing. 
(4) The increased use of ground-based mobile surveillance 
systems by military or civilian personnel. 
(5) The deployment of additional unmanned aerial systems 
and manned aircraft to provide surveillance of the southern 
land border of the United States. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00907
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4362 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(6) The deployment and provision of capability for radio 
communications interoperability between U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection and State, local, and tribal law enforcement 
agencies. 
(7) The construction of checkpoints along the southern land 
border of the United States. 
(8) The use of additional mobile patrols by military or 
civilian personnel, particularly in rural, high-trafficked areas, 
as designated by the Commissioner of Customs and Border 
Protection. 
Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and 
Limitations 
SEC. 1061. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
REPORTS REQUIRED BY LAW. 
(a) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after section 122 the following new 
section: 
‘‘§ 122a. Public availability of Department of Defense reports 
required by law 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 
each report described in subsection (b) is made available to the 
public, upon request submitted on or after the date on which such 
report is submitted to Congress, through the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs. 
‘‘(b) COVERED REPORTS.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph 
(2), a report described in this subsection is any report that is 
required by law to be submitted to Congress by the Secretary 
of Defense, or by any element of the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(2) A report otherwise described in paragraph (1) is not a 
report described in this subsection if the report contains— 
‘‘(A) classified information; 
‘‘(B) proprietary information; 
‘‘(C) information that is exempt from disclosure under sec-
tion 552 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the ‘Freedom 
of Information Act’); or 
‘‘(D) any other type of information that the Secretary of 
Defense determines should not be made available to the public 
in the interest of national security.’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 122 the following new item: 
‘‘122a. Public availability of Department of Defense reports required by law.’’. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 122a of title 10, United States 
Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall take effect 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect 
to reports that are required by law to be submitted to Congress 
on or after that date. 
10 USC 122a 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00908
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4363 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1062. PROHIBITION ON INFRINGING ON THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT 
TO LAWFULLY ACQUIRE, POSSESS, OWN, CARRY, AND 
OTHERWISE USE PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS, AMMUNI-
TION, AND OTHER WEAPONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), the 
Secretary of Defense shall not prohibit, issue any requirement 
relating to, or collect or record any information relating to the 
otherwise lawful acquisition, possession, ownership, carrying, or 
other use of a privately owned firearm, privately owned ammuni-
tion, or another privately owned weapon by a member of the Armed 
Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense on prop-
erty that is not— 
(1) a military installation; or 
(2) any other property that is owned or operated by the 
Department of Defense. 
(b) EXISTING REGULATIONS AND RECORDS.— 
(1) REGULATIONS.—Any regulation promulgated before the 
date of enactment of this Act shall have no force or effect 
to the extent that it requires conduct prohibited by this section. 
(2) RECORDS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall destroy 
any record containing information described in subsection (a) 
that was collected before the date of enactment of this Act. 
(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Subsection (a) shall not be con-
strued to limit the authority of the Secretary of Defense to— 
(1) create or maintain records relating to, or regulate the 
possession, carrying, or other use of a firearm, ammunition, 
or other weapon by a member of the Armed Forces or civilian 
employee of the Department of Defense while— 
(A) engaged in official duties on behalf of the Depart-
ment of Defense; or 
(B) wearing the uniform of an Armed Force; or 
(2) create or maintain records relating to an investigation, 
prosecution, or adjudication of an alleged violation of law 
(including regulations not prohibited under subsection (a)), 
including matters related to whether a member of the Armed 
Forces constitutes a threat to the member or others. 
(d) REVIEW.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 
(1) conduct a comprehensive review of the privately owned 
weapons policy of the Department of Defense, including legal 
and policy issues regarding the regulation of privately owned 
firearms off of a military installation, as recommended by the 
Department of Defense Independent Review Related to Fort 
Hood; and 
(2) submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the 
Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House 
of Representatives a report regarding the findings of and rec-
ommendations relating to the review conducted under para-
graph (1), including any recommendations for adjustments to 
the requirements under this section. 
(e) MILITARY INSTALLATION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘‘military installation’’ has the meaning given that term under sec-
tion 2687(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code. 
Reports. 
Deadline. 
Records. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 1030 
note prec. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00909
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4364 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1063. DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY FOR 
DETERMINING THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF NUCLEAR 
WEAPONS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary 
of Defense shall, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council, 
develop the following: 
(1) Criteria for determining the appropriate baseline for 
safety and security of nuclear weapons through the life cycle 
of such weapons. 
(2) A methodology for determining the level of safety and 
security that may be achieved through a life extension program 
for each type of nuclear weapon. 
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2012, the 
Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing 
the criteria and the methodology developed pursuant to subsection 
(a). 
Subtitle H—Other Matters 
SEC. 1071. NATIONAL DEFENSE PANEL. 
Subsection (f) of section 118 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(f) NATIONAL DEFENSE PANEL.— 
‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than February 1 of a year 
in which a quadrennial defense review is conducted under 
this section, there shall be established an independent panel 
to be known as the National Defense Panel (in this subsection 
referred to as the ‘Panel’). The Panel shall have the duties 
set forth in this subsection. 
‘‘(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Panel shall be composed of ten 
members from private civilian life who are recognized experts 
in matters relating to the national security of the United States. 
Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows: 
‘‘(A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed 
Services of the House of Representatives. 
‘‘(B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed 
Services of the Senate. 
‘‘(C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. 
‘‘(D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee 
on Armed Services of the Senate. 
‘‘(3) CO-CHAIRS OF THE PANEL.—In addition to the members 
appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall 
appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as 
co-chairs of the panel. 
‘‘(4) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES.—Members shall 
be appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the 
Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appoint-
ment. 
‘‘(5) DUTIES.—The Panel shall have the following duties 
with respect to a quadrennial defense review: 
‘‘(A) While the review is being conducted, the Panel 
shall review the updates from the Secretary of Defense 
required under paragraph (8) on the conduct of the review. 
‘‘(B) The Panel shall— 
Appointment. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00910
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4365 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(i) review the Secretary of Defense’s terms of ref-
erence and any other materials providing the basis 
for, or substantial inputs to, the work of the Depart-
ment of Defense on the quadrennial defense review; 
‘‘(ii) conduct an assessment of the assumptions, 
strategy, findings, and risks of the report on the 
quadrennial defense review required in subsection (d), 
with particular attention paid to the risks described 
in that report; 
‘‘(iii) conduct an independent assessment of a 
variety of possible force structures of the armed forces, 
including the force structure identified in the report 
on the quadrennial defense review required in sub-
section (d); 
‘‘(iv) review the resource requirements identified 
pursuant to subsection (b)(3) and, to the extent prac-
ticable, make a general comparison to the resource 
requirements to support the forces contemplated under 
the force structures assessed under this subparagraph; 
and 
‘‘(v) provide to Congress and the Secretary of 
Defense, through the report under paragraph (7), any 
recommendations it considers appropriate for their 
consideration. 
‘‘(6) FIRST MEETING.—If the Secretary of Defense has not 
made the Secretary’s appointments to the Panel under para-
graph (3) by February 1 of a year in which a quadrennial 
defense review is conducted under this section, the Panel shall 
convene for its first meeting with the remaining members. 
‘‘(7) REPORT.—Not later than 3 months after the date on 
which the report on a quadrennial defense review is submitted 
under subsection (d) to the congressional committees named 
in that subsection, the Panel established under paragraph (1) 
shall submit to those committees an assessment of the quadren-
nial defense review, including a description of the items 
addressed under paragraph (5) with respect to that quadrennial 
defense review. 
‘‘(8) UPDATES FROM SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall ensure that periodically, but not less often 
than every 60 days, or at the request of the co-chairs, the 
Department of Defense briefs the Panel on the progress of 
the conduct of a quadrennial defense review under subsection 
(a). 
‘‘(9) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.— 
‘‘(A) The Panel may request directly from the Depart-
ment of Defense and any of its components such informa-
tion as the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties 
under this subsection. The head of the department or 
agency concerned shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure 
that information requested by the Panel under this para-
graph is promptly provided to the maximum extent prac-
tical. 
‘‘(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary 
of Defense shall make available to the Panel the services 
of any federally funded research and development center 
that is covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Depart-
ment of Defense. 
Deadlines. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00911
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4366 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided 
in section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the condi-
tions set forth in such section. 
‘‘(D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided 
from amounts available to the Department of Defense. 
‘‘(10) TERMINATION.—The Panel for a quadrennial defense 
review shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the 
Panel submits its final report on the quadrennial defense review 
under paragraph (7).’’. 
SEC. 1072. SALE OF SURPLUS MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO STATE AND 
LOCAL HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGE-
MENT AGENCIES. 
(a) STATE
AND LOCAL AGENCIES
TO WHICH SALES MAY BE 
MADE.—Section 2576 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘State and local law enforcement and 
firefighting agencies’’ and inserting ‘‘State and local law 
enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emer-
gency management agencies’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘in carrying out law enforcement and 
firefighting activities’’ and inserting ‘‘in carrying out law 
enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, and emer-
gency management activities’’; and 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘State or local law enforce-
ment or firefighting agency’’ both places it appears and 
inserting ‘‘State or local law enforcement, firefighting, homeland 
security, or emergency management agency’’. 
(b) TYPES OF EQUIPMENT THAT MAY BE SOLD.—Subsection (a) 
of such section is further amended by striking ‘‘and protective 
body armor’’ and inserting ‘‘personal protective equipment, and 
other appropriate equipment’’. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2576. Surplus military equipment: sale to State and local 
law enforcement, firefighting, homeland security, 
and emergency management agencies’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to section 2576 
in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 153 of 
such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘2576. Surplus military equipment: sale to State and local law enforcement, fire-
fighting, homeland security, and emergency management agencies.’’. 
SEC. 1073. DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVA-
TION PROGRAM. 
(a) PROGRAM ESTABLISHED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
establish a competitive, merit-based program to accelerate the 
fielding of technologies developed pursuant to phase II Small Busi-
ness Innovation Research Program projects, technologies developed 
by the defense laboratories, and other innovative technologies 
(including dual use technologies). The purpose of this program 
is to stimulate innovative technologies and reduce acquisition or 
lifecycle costs, address technical risks, improve the timeliness and 
thoroughness of test and evaluation outcomes, and rapidly insert 
10 USC 2359a 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00912
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4367 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
such products directly in support of primarily major defense acquisi-
tion programs, but also other defense acquisition programs that 
meet critical national security needs. 
(b) GUIDELINES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines 
for the operation of the program. At a minimum such guidance 
shall provide for the following: 
(1) The issuance of an annual broad agency announcement 
or the use of any other competitive or merit-based processes 
by the Department of Defense and by each military department 
for candidate proposals in direct support of primarily major 
defense acquisition programs, but also other defense acquisition 
programs as described in subsection (a). 
(2) The review of candidate proposals by the Department 
of Defense and by each military department and the merit- 
based selection of the most promising cost-effective proposals 
for funding through contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
other transactions for the purposes of carrying out the program. 
(3) The total amount of funding provided to any project 
under the program shall not exceed $3,000,000, unless the 
Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, approves a larger 
amount of funding for the project. Any such approval shall 
be made on a case-by-case basis and notice of any such approval 
shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees 
by not later than 30 days after such approval is made. 
(4) No project shall be funded under the program for more 
than two years, unless the Secretary, or the Secretary’s des-
ignee, approves funding for any additional year. Any such 
approval shall be made on a case-by-case basis and notice 
of any such approval shall be submitted to the congressional 
defense committees by not later than 30 days after such 
approval is made. 
(c) 
TREATMENT
PURSUANT
TO
CERTAIN
CONGRESSIONAL 
RULES.—Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require 
or enable any official of the Department of Defense to provide 
funding under this section to any earmark as defined pursuant 
to House Rule XXI, clause 9, or any congressionally directed 
spending item as defined pursuant to Senate Rule XLIV, paragraph 
5. 
(d) FUNDING.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for 
such purpose, the amounts authorized to be appropriated for 
research, development, test, and evaluation for each of fiscal years 
2011 through 2015 may be used for any such fiscal year for the 
program established under subsection (a). 
(e) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary may transfer funds 
available for the program to the research, development, test, and 
evaluation accounts of a military department, defense agency, or 
the unified combatant command for special operations forces pursu-
ant to a proposal, or any part of a proposal, that the Secretary 
determines would directly support the purposes of the program. 
The transfer authority provided in this subsection is in addition 
to any other transfer authority available to the Department of 
Defense. 
(f) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the last day of a 
fiscal year during which the Secretary carries out a program under 
this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report that includes a list and description of each 
Notice. 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00913
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4368 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
project funded under this section, including, for each such project, 
the amount of funding provided for the project, the defense acquisi-
tion program that the project supports, including the extent to 
which the project meets needs identified in its acquisition plan, 
the anticipated timeline for transition for the project, and the 
degree to which a competitive, merit-based process was used to 
evaluate and select the performers of the projects selected under 
this program. 
(g) TERMINATION.—The authority to carry out a program under 
this section shall terminate on September 30, 2015. Any amounts 
made available for the program that remain available for obligation 
on the date the program terminates may be transferred under 
subsection (e) during the 180-day period beginning on the date 
of the termination of the program. 
SEC. 1074. AUTHORITY TO MAKE EXCESS NONLETHAL SUPPLIES AVAIL-
ABLE FOR DOMESTIC EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE. 
(a) DOMESTIC AUTHORITY.—Section 2557 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘In addition, the Secretary may make nonlethal 
excess supplies of the Department available to support domestic 
emergency assistance activities.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Excess’’; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) Excess supplies made available under this section to sup-
port domestic emergency assistance activities shall be transferred 
to the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Defense 
may provide assistance in the distribution of such supplies at the 
request of the Secretary of Homeland Security.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 
(1) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2557. Excess nonlethal supplies: availability for humani-
tarian relief, domestic emergency assistance, and 
homeless veterans assistance’’. 
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section 
in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 152 of 
such title is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘2557. Excess nonlethal supplies: availability for humanitarian relief, domestic 
emergency assistance, and homeless veterans assistance.’’. 
SEC. 1075. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 
(a) TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 5, United States 
Code, is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 8344(l)(2)(B), as added by section 1122(a) of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2505), is amended by striking 
‘‘5201 et seq.’’ and inserting ‘‘5211 et seq.’’. 
(2) Section 9902(a)(2), as added by section 1113(d) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2499), is amended by striking ‘‘chapters’’ 
both places it appears and inserting ‘‘chapter’’. 
(b) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States 
Code, is amended as follows: 
Time period. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00914
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4369 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle 
A and at the beginning of part II of such subtitle are amended 
by striking ‘‘1031’’ in the item relating to chapter 53 and 
inserting ‘‘1030’’. 
(2) Section 127a is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
both places it appears and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(3) Section 127d(d)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘Committee 
on International Relations’’ and inserting ‘‘Committee on For-
eign Affairs’’. 
(4) Section 132 is amended— 
(A) by redesignating subsection (d), as added by section 
2831(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2669), as sub-
section (e); and 
(B) in such subsection, by striking ‘‘Guam Executive 
Council’’ and inserting ‘‘Guam Oversight Council’’. 
(5) Section 139c(d)(4) is amended by adding at period at 
the end. 
(6) Section 139d(a)(6) is amended by striking ‘‘propriety’’ 
and inserting ‘‘proprietary’’. 
(7) Section 172 is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The Secretaries’’; and 
(B) by striking subsection (b). 
(8) Section 181(b)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘Performance 
Evaluation’’ and inserting ‘‘Program Evaluation’’. 
(9) Section 186 is amended by redesignating the second 
subsection (c) (relating to definitions) as subsection (d). 
(10)(A) Section 382 is amended by striking ‘‘section 175 
or 2332c’’ in subsections (a), (b)(2)(C), and (d)(2)(A)(ii) and 
inserting ‘‘section 175, 229, or 2332a’’. 
(B) The heading of such section is amended by striking 
‘‘chemical or biological’’. 
(C) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 18 
is amended by striking the item relating to section 382 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘382. Emergency situations involving weapons of mass destruction.’’. 
(11) Section 428(f) is amended by striking ‘‘, United States 
Code,’’. 
(12) Section 525 is amended— 
(A) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘section 601(b)(4)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘section 601(b)(5)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (g)(1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘and is not’’ and inserting ‘‘and 
are not’’; and 
(ii) by adding at period at the end. 
(13) Section 841(c) is amended by striking ‘‘trail counsel’’ 
and inserting ‘‘trial counsel’’. 
(14) Section 843(b)(2)(B)(v) is amended by striking ‘‘Kid-
naping; indecent assault;’’ and inserting ‘‘Kidnaping, indecent 
assault,’’. 
(15) Section 1030(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘3 years,’’ 
and inserting ‘‘three years.’’. 
(16) Section 1146 is amended— 
10 USC 127. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00915
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4370 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) BENEFITS FOR 
MEMBERS INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED.—’’, as added by sec-
tion 5(1) of Public Law 110–317 (122 Stat. 3528); 
(B) by redesignating the second subsection (b) as sub-
section (c); and 
(C) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 
(i) by striking ‘‘BENEFITS FOR’’ in the subsection 
heading; 
(ii) by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ in the matter pre-
ceding paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’; and 
(iii) by striking ‘‘the members entitlement’’ in para-
graph (2) and inserting ‘‘the member’s entitlement’’. 
(17) Section 1174(i) is amended by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(18) Section 1175a(j)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘title 10’’ 
and inserting ‘‘this title’’. 
(19) Section 1203(b)(4)(B) is amended by striking ‘‘deter-
mination,,’’ and inserting ‘‘determination,’’. 
(20) Section 1482a(c)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
1482(a)(11)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1482(e)(5)(A)’’. 
(21) Section 1566a(a)(1) is amended by inserting a close 
parenthesis before the period at the end. 
(22) Section 1599c(a)(2)(B) is amended by striking ‘‘sub-
chapter 1’’ and inserting ‘‘subchapter I’’. 
(23) Section 1781b(d) is amended by striking ‘‘March 1, 
2008, and each year thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1 each 
year’’. 
(24) Section 1781c(h)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘180 days 
after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, and annually there-
after’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30 each year’’. 
(25) Section 1788(b) is amended by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(26) Section 2004b(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘pay grade 
0–3’’ and inserting ‘‘pay grade O–3’’. 
(27) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 104 
is amended by transferring the item relating to section 2113a 
to appear after the item relating to section 2113. 
(28) Section 2130a(b)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘Training 
Program’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘Training Corps 
program’’. 
(29) Section 2222(a) is amended by striking ‘‘Effective 
October 1, 2005, funds’’ and inserting ‘‘Funds’’. 
(30) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter 
I of chapter 134, as amended by section 1031(a)(2) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2448), is amended by transferring the 
item relating to section 2241a from the end of the table of 
sections to appear after the item relating to section 2241. 
(31) Section 2323(a)(1)(D) is amended by inserting a close 
parenthesis before the semicolon. 
(32) Section 2362(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘IV’’ and 
inserting ‘‘V’’. 
(33) Section 2366a(c) is amended— 
(A) by inserting a space between ‘‘(c)’’ and the sub-
section heading; and 
10 USC 1174. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00916
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4371 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘section 125a(a) of 
this title’’ and inserting ‘‘section 118b(c)(3) of this title’’. 
(34) Section 2433(a)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
2430a(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2430a(d)’’. 
(35) Section 2433a(b)(2)(B) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
181(g)((1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 181(g)(1)’’. 
(36) Section 2476(d)(2)(D) is amended by striking ‘‘Navy 
Depots’’ and inserting ‘‘Navy depots’’. 
(37) Section 2488(f) is amended by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
both places it appears and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(38) Section 2533a(d) is amended in paragraphs (1) and 
(4) by striking ‘‘(b)(1)(A), (b)(2), or (b)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(1)(A) 
or (b)(2)’’. 
(39) Section 2603 is amended by striking ‘‘Armed Forces’’ 
both places it appears and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(40) Section 2642(a)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘During 
the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘During the period beginning on October 28, 
2009, and ending on October 28, 2014’’. 
(41) Section 2667(e) is amended— 
(A) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘sections 2668 
and 2669’’ and inserting ‘‘section 2668’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘subsection (f)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘subsection (g)’’. 
(42) Section 2671(a)(2) is amended by striking ‘‘Armed 
Forces’’ and inserting ‘‘armed forces’’. 
(43) Section 2684a(g)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘March 
1, 2007, and annually thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1 each 
year’’. 
(44) Section 2687a(a) is amended by striking ‘‘31for’’ and 
inserting ‘‘31 for’’. 
(45) 
Section 
2694c(d)(4) 
is 
amended 
by 
inserting 
‘‘Authorization’’ after ‘‘Military Construction’’. 
(46) Chapter 160 is amended— 
(A) in section 2700(2), by inserting ‘‘ ‘pollutant or 
contaminant’,’’ after ‘‘ ‘person’,’’; and 
(B) in section 2701(b)(1), by striking ‘‘hazardous sub-
stances, pollutants, and contaminants’’ and inserting ‘‘a 
hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant’’. 
(47) The table of subchapters at the beginning of chapter 
173 is amended by inserting ‘‘Sec.’’ above ‘‘2911’’. 
(48) Section 2922d is amended by striking ‘‘1 or more’’ 
each place it appears and inserting ‘‘one or more’’. 
(49) Section 7042(a)(1)(A) is amended by striking the 
comma after ‘‘captain’’. 
(50) Section 9515 is amended— 
(A) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Section 1356 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for 2008’’ and inserting 
‘‘section 1356 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2008’’; 
(B) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 
(C) in subsection (j)(1), by striking ‘‘United States 
Code,’’. 
(51) Section 10214 is amended by striking ‘‘14508(e)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘14508(h)’’. 
10 USC 2433. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00917
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4372 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(52) Section 10216 is amended by striking ‘‘section 115(c)’’ 
in subsections (b)(1), (c)(1), and (c)(2)(A) and inserting ‘‘section 
115(d)’’. 
(53) Section 10217(c)(1) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘Effective October 1, 2007, the’’ and 
inserting ‘‘The’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘after the preceding sentence takes 
effect’’. 
(54) Section 12203(a) is amended by striking ‘‘above’’ in 
the first sentence and inserting ‘‘of’’. 
(55) Section 16132a is amended— 
(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘agreement to 
service’’ and inserting ‘‘agreement to serve’’; and 
(B) in subsection (i)(2), by striking ‘‘whose’’. 
(56) Section 16163a(b)(2) is amended by striking ‘‘section 
(j)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (j)’’. 
(c) TITLE 37.—Title 37, United States Code, is amended as 
follows: 
(1) Section 303a(e)(3)(B) is amended by inserting ‘‘of’’ after 
‘‘result’’. 
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 
is amended by striking the item related to section 312 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘312. Special pay: nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.’’. 
(3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 
is amended— 
(A) by striking the item related to section 438 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘411k. Travel and transportation allowances: non-medical attendants for members 
who are determined to be very seriously or seriously wounded, ill, or in-
jured.’’; and 
(B) by striking the item related to section 438 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘438. Preventive health services allowance.’’. 
(4) Section 411k(d)(1) is amended by striking ‘‘allowances 
section’’ and inserting ‘‘allowances under section’’. 
(d) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2010.—Effective as of October 28, 2009, and as if included therein 
as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2010 (Public Law 111–84) is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 325(d)(4) (123 Stat. 2254) is amended by striking 
‘‘section 236’’ and inserting ‘‘section 235’’. 
(2) Section 502(c)(3) (123 Stat. 2274) is amended by striking 
‘‘officers’’ and inserting ‘‘general officers and flag officers’’. 
(3) Section 581(a)(1)(C) (123 Stat. 2326) is amended by 
striking ‘‘subsection (f)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (g), as 
redesignated by section 582(b)(1)’’. 
(4) Section 584(a) (123 Stat. 2330) is amended by striking 
‘‘such Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens 
Absentee Voting Act’’. 
(5) Section 585(b)(1) (123 Stat. 2331) is amended by striking 
subparagraphs (A) and (B), and inserting the following new 
subparagraphs: 
‘‘(A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘section 102(4)’ and 
inserting ‘section 102(a)(4)’; and 
42 USC 1973ff. 
42 USC 1973ff. 
42 USC 1973ff–2. 
10 USC 525. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 525 note. 
10 USC 10216. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00918
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4373 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(B) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the fol-
lowing new paragraph: 
‘‘ ‘(4) prescribe a suggested design for absentee ballot 
mailing envelopes;’; and’’. 
(6) Section 589 (123 Stat. 2334; 42 U.S.C. 1973ff–7) is 
amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘section 107(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘sec-
tion 107(1)’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘1973ff et seq.’’ and inserting 
‘‘1973ff–6(1)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘1977ff note’’ and 
inserting ‘‘1973ff note’’. 
(7) The undesignated section immediately following section 
603 (123 Stat. 2350) is designated as section 604. 
(8) Section 714(c) (123 Stat. 2382; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) 
is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘feasability’’ both places it appears and 
inserting ‘‘feasibility’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘specialities’’ both places it appears 
and inserting ‘‘specialties’’. 
(9) Section 813(a)(3) (123 Stat. 2407) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘order’’ after ‘‘task’’ in the matter to be struck. 
(10) Section 921(b)(2) (123 Stat. 2432) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘subchapter I of’’ before ‘‘chapter 21’’. 
(11) Section 1014(c) (123 Stat. 2442) is amended by striking 
‘‘in which the support’’ and inserting ‘‘in which support’’. 
(12) Section 1043(d) (123 Stat. 2457; 10 U.S.C. 2353 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘et 13 seq.’’ and inserting ‘‘et seq.’’. 
(13) Section 1055(f) (123 Stat. 2462) is amended by striking 
‘‘Combating’’ and inserting ‘‘Combatting’’. 
(14) Section 1063(d)(2) (123 Stat. 2470) is amended by 
striking ‘‘For purposes of this section, the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’. 
(15) Section 1080(b) (123 Stat. 2479; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) 
is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘title 14’’ and inserting ‘‘title XIV’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘title 10’’ and inserting ‘‘title X’’; and 
(C) by striking ‘‘the Military Commissions Act of 2006 
(10 U.S.C. 948 et seq.; Public Law 109–366)’’ and inserting 
‘‘chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code’’. 
(16) Section 1111(b) (123 Stat. 2495; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note 
prec.) is amended by striking ‘‘the Secretary’’ in the first sen-
tence and inserting ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’. 
(17) Section 1113(g)(1) (123 Stat. 2502; 5 U.S.C. 9902 note) 
is amended by inserting ‘‘United States Code,’’ after ‘‘title 5,’’ 
the first place it appears. 
(18) Section 1202(c) (123 Stat. 2512) is amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘1208(f) of the Ronald W. Reagan 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 
(Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086) is amended in the 
second sentence’’ and inserting ‘‘1208(f)(2) of the Ronald 
W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as 
amended by section 1202(a) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 363), is further amended’’; and 
10 USC 113 note. 
10 USC 2371; 
50 USC 2369. 
10 USC 421 prec. 
10 USC 2302 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00919
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4374 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (8), as 
proposed to be inserted, as subparagraphs (A) through 
(H), respectively and indenting the left margin of such 
subparagraphs, as so redesignated, 4 ems from the left 
margin. 
(19) Section 1261 (123 Stat. 2553; 22 U.S.C. 6201 note) 
is amended by inserting a space between the first short title 
and ‘‘or’’. 
(20) Section 1306(b) (123 Stat. 2560) is amended by striking 
‘‘fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘Fiscal Year’’. 
(21) Subsection (b) of section 1803 (123 Stat. 2612) is 
amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) APPELLATE REVIEW UNDER DETAINEE TREATMENT ACT OF 
2005.— 
‘‘(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL 
APPROPRIATIONS
TO
ADDRESS
HURRICANES
IN
THE
GULF
OF 
MEXICO, AND PANDEMIC INFLUENZA ACT, 2006.—Section 1005(e) 
of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title X of Public Law 
109–148; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended by striking paragraph 
(3). 
‘‘(2) NATIONAL
DEFENSE
AUTHORIZATION
ACT
FOR
FISCAL 
YEAR 2006.—Section 1405(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 
2005 (Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended 
by striking paragraph (3).’’. 
(22) Section 1916(b)(1)(B) (123 Stat. 2624) is amended by 
striking the comma after ‘‘5941’’. 
(23) Section 2804(d)(2) (123 Stat. 2662) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘subchapter III of’’ before ‘‘chapter 169’’. 
(24) Section 2835(f)(1) (123 Stat. 2677) is amended by 
striking ‘‘publically-available’’ and inserting ‘‘publicly avail-
able’’. 
(25) Section 3503(b)(1) (123 Stat. 2719) is amended by 
striking the extra quotation marks. 
(26) Section 3508(1) (123 Stat. 2721) is amended by striking 
‘‘headline’’ and inserting ‘‘heading’’. 
(e) DUNCAN HUNTER NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009.—The Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417) is 
amended as follows: 
(1) Section 143(b)(1) (122 Stat. 4381; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘identifies’’ and inserting ‘‘identify’’. 
(2) Section 231(b) (122 Stat. 4391; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘section’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection’’. 
(3) Section 233(a)(3) (122 Stat. 4393) is amended by striking 
‘‘122 Stat. 42’’ and inserting ‘‘122 Stat. 43’’. 
(4) Section 324(b) (122 Stat. 4416; 10 U.S.C. 8062 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘their’’ and inserting ‘‘its’’. 
(5) Section 332(e) (122 Stat. 4420; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘section (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 
(d)’’. 
(6) Section 358(b) (122 Stat. 4427; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) 
is amended by inserting a comma after ‘‘Agent’’. 
(7) Section 596(b)(1)(D) (10 U.S.C. 1071 note), as amended 
by section 594 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2338), is 
amended by striking ‘‘or flag’’ the second place it appears. 
10 USC 2431 
note. 
49 USC 109. 
46 USC 51301. 
10 USC 2687 
note. 
10 USC 2851. 
5 USC 5304 note; 
39 USC 1005. 
10 USC 801 note. 
10 USC 802. 
22 USC 5959. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00920
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4375 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(8) Section 597(f) (122 Stat. 4481) is amended by striking 
‘‘meeting’’ and inserting ‘‘meanings’’. 
(9) Section 604(b) (122 Stat. 4483) is amended by inserting 
‘‘of’’ after ‘‘(a)(1)’’. 
(10) Section 619(d) (122 Stat. 4489; 37 U.S.C. 353 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘such subsections’’ and inserting ‘‘such 
subsection’’. 
(11) Section 711(d)(2) (122 Stat. 4501) is amended by 
striking ‘‘1111((b)’’ and inserting ‘‘1111(b)(3)’’. 
(12) Effective as of October 14, 2008, and as if included 
in Public Law 110–417 as enacted, section 727(b)(2) is amended 
by striking ‘‘compelling’’. 
(13) Section 822(c)(1)(A) (122 Stat. 4532) is amended by 
striking ‘‘this title’’ and inserting ‘‘title 10, United States Code’’. 
(14) Section 863(b)(3)(A) (122 Stat. 4547) is amended by 
striking 
‘‘subsection 
(d)(2)(A)’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘subsection 
(d)(3)(A)’’. 
(15) Section 869 (122 Stat. 4553) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘433(a)’’ and inserting 
‘‘433a(a)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (c)(4)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘37(j)’’ and inserting ‘‘37(g)’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘433(j)’’ and inserting ‘‘433(g)’’. 
(16) Section 873(a)(4) (122 Stat. 4558; 10 U.S.C. 6101 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘to Government’’ and inserting ‘‘to the 
Government’’. 
(17) Section 1111 (10 U.S.C. 143 note), as amended by 
section 1109 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2492), is 
amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘section 821’’ and 
inserting ‘‘section 833’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)— 
(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking ‘‘secretary of a military department’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Secretary of a military department’’; 
(ii) in paragraph (1)— 
(I) by striking ‘‘the the requirements’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the requirements’’; and 
(II) by striking ‘‘this title’’ and inserting ‘‘such 
title’’; and 
(iii) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘any any of the 
following’’ and inserting ‘‘any of the following’’. 
(18) Section 1602(5) (122 Stat. 4653; 22 U.S.C. 2368 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘a Active’’ and inserting ‘‘an Active’’. 
(19) Section 3113 (122 Stat. 4754; 50 U.S.C. 2444) is 
amended— 
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting a close parenthesis 
before the semicolon; and 
(B) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘‘fails repay’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fails to repay’’. 
(20) Section 3512 (122 Stat. 4770; 48 U.S.C. 1421r) is 
amended by inserting a period at the end of subsection (f). 
(f) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2008.—The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows: 
41 USC 1704. 
41 USC 3302. 
10 USC 2320 
note. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 1203 and 
note. 
10 USC 1079 
note. 
37 USC 427 note. 
10 USC 2120 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00921
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4376 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) Section 624 (122 Stat. 153; 37 U.S.C. 307a note) is 
amended— 
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Operating’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Operation’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Operating’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Operation’’. 
(2) Effective as of January 28, 2008, and as if included 
in Public Law 110–181 as enacted, section 804 (122 Stat. 208) 
is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘speciality’’ and 
inserting ‘‘specialty’’; and 
(B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘subsection (c)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(1)’’. 
(3) Section 808 (122 Stat. 215; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is 
amended by redesignating the second subsection (c) as sub-
section (d). 
(4) Section 827(a)(2) (122 Stat. 228; 10 U.S.C. 2410n note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘para-
graph (1)’’. 
(5) Section 843 (122 Stat. 236) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (A)’’; and 
(B) in subsection (b)(2)(C), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (A)’’. 
(6) Section 890 (122 Stat. 269; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is 
amended— 
(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘Act’’ before ‘‘of 1979’’; 
(B) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘Act’’ before ‘‘of 1979’’; 
and 
(C) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘sections’’ and 
inserting ‘‘parts’’. 
(7) Section 1063(a)(16) (122 Stat. 322) is amended by 
striking ‘‘(1)’’. 
(8) Effective as of January 28, 2008, and as if included 
in Public Law 110–181 as enacted, section 1075(a) (122 Stat. 
333) is amended by striking ‘‘June’’ and inserting ‘‘September’’. 
(9) Section 1243(c) (122 Stat. 396) is amended by striking 
‘‘4))’’ and inserting ‘‘4)))’’. 
(10) Section 1244(a)(3) (122 Stat. 396) is amended by 
striking ‘‘4))’’ and inserting ‘‘4)))’’. 
(g) JOHN WARNER NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Effective as of October 17, 2006, and as if 
included therein as enacted, the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is 
amended as follows: 
(1) Section 321(a)(1) (120 Stat. 2144; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘Public Law 190–163’’ and inserting 
‘‘Public Law 109–163’’. 
(2) Section 348(2) (120 Stat. 2159) is amended in the matter 
to be struck from and inserted in section 366(d) of the Bob 
Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 
(Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2523) by striking ‘‘within’’ both 
places it appears and inserting ‘‘Within’’. 
(3) Section 355(b)(1) (120 Stat. 2162) is amended in the 
matter to be struck from section 344 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 
10 U.S.C. note prec. 1030) by striking ‘‘Operation Iraqi Freedom 
10 USC 1030 
note prec. 
10 USC 113 note. 
10 USC 2663 
note. 
Effective date. 
8 USC 1157 note. 
50 USC 2301 
note. 
8 USC 1157 note. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 14310. 
41 USC 4106. 
10 USC 2304c. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 2533b 
and note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00922
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4377 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
and Operation Enduring Freedom’’ and inserting ‘‘Operation 
Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom’’. 
(4) Section 511(b)(3) (120 Stat. 2183) is amended in the 
matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘section’’ and 
inserting ‘‘title’’. 
(5) Section 705(b)(2) (120 Stat. 2281; 10 U.S.C. 1074g note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘section 1074g(a)(2)(E)’’ and inserting 
‘‘section 1074g(a)(2)’’. 
(6) Section 2821(b)(1) (120 Stat. 2474) is amended by 
inserting ‘‘by striking’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)(1),’’. 
(h) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
2006.—Effective as of January 6, 2006, and as if included therein 
as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2006 (Public Law 109–163) is amended as follows: 
(1) Section 515(h) (119 Stat. 3237; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) 
is amended by striking ‘‘10 USC 10101 note.’’. 
(2) Section 535(b) (119 Stat. 3249; 10 U.S.C. 2101 note) 
is amended by inserting ‘‘of’’ after ‘‘Committee on Armed Serv-
ices’’ the first place it appears. 
(3) Section 1056(e)(2) (119 Stat. 3440) is amended by 
striking ‘‘Section’’ and inserting ‘‘Effective as of December 2, 
2002, and as if included in Public Law 107–314 as enacted, 
section’’. 
(4) Section 1057 (119 Stat. 3440) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)— 
(i) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘4778,’’; and 
(ii) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘4747’’ and 
inserting ‘‘2651’’; 
(B) in subsection (b)(3)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘109,’’; and 
(ii) by adding at the end the following new sen-
tence: ‘‘Section 109 is amended by striking ‘State or 
Territory, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or the Dis-
trict of Columbia’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District 
of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands’ ’’; and 
(C) in subsection (b)(5)— 
(i) in the language to be struck from section 324 
of title 32, United States Code, by striking the comma 
after ‘‘Rico’’; and 
(ii) in the language to be inserted in section 324 
of title 32, United States Code, by inserting ‘‘of’’ after 
‘‘Virgin Islands,’’. 
(5) Section 1104 (119 Stat. 3448) is amended— 
(A) in subsection (a)(3)(A), by inserting ‘‘the first place 
it appears’’ before ‘‘and inserting’’; and 
(B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘subsection (c)(1)’’ 
and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)(2)’’. 
(6) Section 2806(c)(2)(A) (119 Stat. 3507) is amended in 
the matter to be struck from and inserted in section 2884(b)(1) 
of title 10, United States Code, by striking ‘‘a’’ both places 
it appears and inserting ‘‘A’’. 
(i) RONALD W. REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005.—The Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375) is 
amended as follows: 
10 USC 113 note. 
10 USC 2884. 
10 USC 2192 
note. 
32 USC 324. 
32 USC 109. 
10 USC 2651. 
10 USC 4778. 
Effective date. 
31 USC 3702. 
10 USC 2651 
note. 
Effective date. 
10 USC 2663. 
10 USC 14311. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00923
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4378 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) Section 577(b)(12) (10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended 
by section 563(e) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 
122 Stat. 4471) is amended by striking ‘‘The Secretary shall 
implement’’ and inserting ‘‘Implementation of’’. 
(2) Section 1085 (118 Stat. 2065; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), 
as amended by section 360(c) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 
122 Stat 78) is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and 
inserting ‘‘section 360(a) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 77)’’. 
(j) BOB STUMP NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2003.—Section 1032(a) of the Bob Stump National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107– 
314; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking ‘‘thereafter,,’’ 
and inserting ‘‘thereafter,’’. 
(k) WEAPON SYSTEMS ACQUISITION REFORM ACT
OF 2009.— 
Effective as of May 22, 2009, and as if included therein as enacted, 
section 205 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 
(Public Law 111–23; 123 Stat. 1724) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘paragraphs (1) and 
(2)’’ in the matter to be inserted and inserting ‘‘paragraphs 
(1), (2), and (3)’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2433a(c)(3)’’ and inserting 
‘‘2433a(c)(1)(C)’’. 
(l) TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SBIR EXTENSION.—Sec-
tion 9(m)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(m)(2)), as 
added by section 847(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2420), is 
amended by striking ‘‘is authorized’’ and inserting ‘‘are authorized’’. 
(m) TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING SMALL SHIPYARDS AND 
MARITIME COMMUNITIES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.—Section 3506 of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as 
reinstated by the amendment made by section 1073(c)(14) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2475), is repealed. 
(n) TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING DOT MARITIME HERIT-
AGE PROPERTY.—Section 6(a)(1)(C) of the National Maritime Herit-
age Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5405(a)(1)(C)), as amended by section 
3509 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2721), is amended by striking 
‘‘the date of enactment of the Maritime Administration Authoriza-
tion Act of 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘October 28, 2009’’. 
(o) TECHNICAL CORRECTION OF CITATION.—Section 42 of the 
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 438) is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(1) by striking ‘‘(41 U.S.C. 607(b))’’ 
and inserting ‘‘(41 U.S.C. 607(d))’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c)(2)(A) by inserting ‘‘of 1978’’ after ‘‘Con-
tract Disputes Act’’. 
SEC. 1076. STUDY ON OPTIMAL BALANCE OF MANNED AND REMOTELY 
PILOTED AIRCRAFT. 
(a) STUDY.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 
commission a study by an independent, non-profit organization 
Deadline. 
41 USC 7105. 
46 USC 53101 
note. 
10 USC 2433a 
note. 
10 USC 2366b 
note. 
Effective date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00924
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4379 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
on the optimal balance between manned and remotely piloted 
aircraft of the Armed Forces. 
(2) SELECTION.—The independent, non-profit organization 
selected for the study under paragraph (1) shall be qualified 
on the basis of having performed work in the fields of national 
security and combat systems. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The study under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) With respect to each military department, an assess-
ment of the feasibility and desirability of a more rapid transi-
tion from manned to remotely piloted aircraft for a range of 
operations, including combat operations. 
(2) An evaluation of the current ability of each military 
department to resist attacks mounted by foreign militaries 
with significant investments in research and development and 
deployment of remotely piloted aircraft, including an assess-
ment of each military department’s ability to defend against— 
(A) a large enemy force of remotely piloted aircraft; 
and 
(B) any other relevant scenario involving remotely 
piloted aircraft that the Secretary determines appropriate. 
(3) An analysis of— 
(A) current and future capabilities of foreign militaries 
in developing and deploying remotely piloted aircraft; and 
(B) identified vulnerabilities of United States weapons 
systems to foreign remotely piloted aircraft. 
(4) Conclusions on the matters described in paragraphs 
(1) through (3) and what the independent, non-profit organiza-
tion conducting the study determines is the optimal balance 
of investment in development and deployment of manned versus 
remotely piloted aircraft. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than December 1, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, 
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House 
of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that includes the 
study under subsection (a). 
(d) FORM.— 
(1) STUDY.—The study under subsection (a) shall include 
a classified annex with respect to the matters described in 
subsection (b)(3). 
(2) REPORT.—The report under subsection (c) may include 
a classified annex. 
(e) REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 
the term ‘‘remotely piloted aircraft’’ means any unmanned aircraft 
operated remotely, whether within or beyond line-of-sight, including 
unmanned aerial systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, remotely 
piloted vehicles, and remotely piloted aircraft. 
SEC. 1077. TREATMENT OF SUCCESSOR CONTINGENCY OPERATION TO 
OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. 
Any law applicable to Operation Iraqi Freedom shall apply 
in the same manner and to the same extent to the successor 
contingency operation known as Operation New Dawn, except as 
specifically provided in this Act, any amendment made by this 
Act, or any other law enacted after the date of the enactment 
of this Act. 
Applicability. 
10 USC 113 note. 
Classified 
information. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00925
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4380 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1078. PROGRAM TO ASSESS THE UTILITY OF NON-LETHAL 
WEAPONS. 
(a) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Secretary of Defense should support the research, development, 
test, and evaluation, procurement, and fielding of effective non- 
lethal weapons and technologies explicitly designed to, with respect 
to counterinsurgency operations, reduce military casualties and 
fatalities, improve military mission accomplishment and operational 
effectiveness, reduce civilian casualties and fatalities, and minimize 
undesired damage to property and the environment. 
(b) PROGRAM REQUIRED.— 
(1) DEMONSTRATION AND ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of 
Defense, acting through the Executive Agent for Non-lethal 
Weapons and in coordination with the Secretaries of the mili-
tary departments and the combatant commanders, shall carry 
out a program to demonstrate and assess the utility and 
effectiveness of non-lethal weapons to provide escalation of 
force options in counter-insurgency operations. 
(2) NON-LETHAL WEAPONS EVALUATED.—In evaluating non- 
lethal weapons under the program under this subsection, the 
Secretary shall include non-lethal weapons designed for 
counter-personnel and counter-materiel missions. 
(c) REPORT.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than October 1, 2011, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report on the role and utility of non- 
lethal weapons and technologies in counterinsurgency oper-
ations. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall 
include the following: 
(A) A description of the results of any demonstrations 
and assessments of non-lethal weapons conducted during 
fiscal year 2011. 
(B) A description of the Secretary’s plans for any dem-
onstrations and assessments of non-lethal weapons to be 
conducted during fiscal years 2012 and 2013. 
(C) A description of the extent to which non-lethal 
weapons doctrine, training, and employment include the 
use of strategic communications strategies to enable the 
effective employment of non-lethal weapons. 
(D) A description of the input of the military depart-
ments in developing concepts of operations and tactics, 
techniques, and procedures for incorporating non-lethal 
weapons into the current escalation of force procedures 
of each department. 
(E) A description of the extent to which non-lethal 
weapons and technologies are integrated into the standard 
equipment and training of military units. 
SEC. 1079. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCE 
REDUCTIONS. 
It is the sense of Congress that no action should be taken 
to implement the reduction of the strategic nuclear forces of the 
United States below the levels described in the Treaty between 
the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Meas-
ures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive 
Arms signed on April 8, 2010 (commonly known as the ‘‘New START 
President. 
Reports. 
Assessment. 
Certification. 
10 USC 2358 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00926
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4381 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Treaty’’), unless the President submits to the congressional defense 
committees a report on such reduction, including— 
(1) the justification for such reduction; 
(2) an assessment of the strategic environment, threat, 
and policy and the technical and operational implications of 
such reduction; and 
(3) written certification by the President that— 
(A) either— 
(i) the strategic environment or the assessment 
of the threat allows for such reduction; or 
(ii) technical measures to provide a commensurate 
or better level of safety, security, and reliability as 
before such reduction have been implemented for the 
remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United States; 
(B) the remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United 
States provide a sufficient means of protection against 
unforeseen technical challenges and geopolitical events; 
(C) such reduction is compensated by other measures 
(such as nuclear modernization, conventional forces, and 
missile defense) that together provide a commensurate or 
better deterrence capability and level of credibility as before 
such reduction; and 
(D) measures to modernize the nuclear weapons com-
plex are being implemented (or have been implemented) 
to provide a sufficiently responsive infrastructure to sup-
port the remaining strategic nuclear forces of the United 
States. 
TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 
MATTERS 
Sec. 1101. Clarification of authorities at personnel demonstration laboratories. 
Sec. 1102. Requirements for Department of Defense senior mentors. 
Sec. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 
pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 
working overseas. 
Sec. 1104. Extension and modification of enhanced Department of Defense appoint-
ment and compensation authority for personnel for care and treatment 
of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces. 
Sec. 1105. Rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing 
work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear aircraft carrier for-
ward deployed in Japan. 
SEC. 1101. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES AT PERSONNEL DEM-
ONSTRATION LABORATORIES. 
(a) 
CLARIFICATION
OF
APPLICABILITY
OF
DIRECT
HIRE 
AUTHORITY.—Section 1108 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4618; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘identified’’ and all that 
follows and inserting ‘‘designated by section 1105(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Depart-
ment of Defense science and technology reinvention labora-
tory.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2 percent’’ and inserting 
‘‘5 percent’’. 
10 USC 1580 
note prec. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00927
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4382 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABILITY OF FULL IMPLEMENTATION 
REQUIREMENT.—Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 357; 
10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘that are exempted by’’ 
and all that follows and inserting ‘‘designated by section 1105(a) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) 
as Department of Defense science and technology reinvention 
laboratories.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘as enumerated in’’ and 
all that follows and inserting ‘‘designated by section 1105(a) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486) as a Department of Defense 
science and technology reinvention laboratory.’’. 
(c) CORRECTION TO SECTION REFERENCE.—Section 1121 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (123 Stat. 
2505) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Section 9902(h) of title 
5, United States Code’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 9902(g) of title 
5, United States Code, as redesignated by section 1113(b)(1)(B)’’; 
and 
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘section 9902(h) of such 
title 5’’ and inserting ‘‘such section’’. 
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
the amendments made by this section shall take effect as of October 
28, 2009. 
(2) The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall take effect 
as of the date of enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 1102. REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR 
MENTORS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall issue appro-
priate policies and procedures to ensure that all senior mentors 
employed by the Department of Defense are— 
(1) hired as highly qualified experts under section 9903 
of title 5, United States Code; and 
(2) required to comply with all applicable Federal laws 
and regulations on personnel and ethics matters. 
(b) SENIOR MENTOR DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘senior 
mentor’’ means a retired flag, general, or other military officer 
or retired senior civilian official who provides expert experience- 
based mentoring, teaching, training, advice, and recommendations 
to senior military officers, staffs, and students as they participate 
in war games, warfighting courses, operational planning, oper-
ational exercises, and decision-making exercises. 
SEC. 1103. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 
LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITA-
TION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 
WORKING OVERSEAS. 
Effective January 1, 2011, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as amended by section 1106(a) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2487), is further amended by striking 
‘‘calendar years 2009 and 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar years 2009 
through 2011’’. 
Effective date. 
Policy. 
Procedures. 
5 USC 9903 note. 
5 USC 9902 note. 
5 USC 9902. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00928
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4383 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1104. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF ENHANCED DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION 
AUTHORITY FOR PERSONNEL FOR CARE AND TREATMENT 
OF WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
FORCES. 
(a) DESIGNATION OF OCCUPATIONS COVERED BY RECRUITMENT 
AND APPOINTMENT AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1599c 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (A)— 
(A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘shortage category posi-
tions’’ and inserting ‘‘a shortage category occupation or 
critical need occupation’’; and 
(B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘highly qualified persons 
directly’’ and inserting ‘‘qualified persons directly in the 
competitive service’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(C) Any designation by the Secretary for purposes of subpara-
graph (A)(i) shall be based on an analysis of current and future 
Department of Defense workforce requirements.’’. 
(b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1)— 
(A) by inserting ‘‘under subsection (a)(1)’’ after ‘‘Sec-
retary of Defense’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ and inserting 
‘‘December 31, 2015’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ 
and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 
SEC. 1105. RATE OF OVERTIME PAY FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
EMPLOYEES PERFORMING WORK ABOARD OR DOCKSIDE 
IN SUPPORT OF THE NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER FOR-
WARD DEPLOYED IN JAPAN. 
(a) OVERTIME PAY AT TIME-AND-A-HALF RATE.—Section 5542(a) 
of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(6)(A) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), for an 
employee of the Department of the Navy who is assigned to 
temporary duty to perform work aboard, or dockside in direct 
support of, the nuclear aircraft carrier that is forward deployed 
in Japan and who would be nonexempt under the Fair Labor 
Standards Act but for the application of the foreign area exemp-
tion in section 13(f) of that Act (29 U.S.C. 213(f)), the overtime 
hourly rate of pay is an amount equal to one and one-half 
times the hourly rate of basic pay of the employee, and all 
that amount is premium pay. 
‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall expire on September 30, 
2014.’’. 
(b) REPORTS.— 
(1) SECRETARY OF NAVY REPORT.—Not later than September 
30, 2013, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management a report that— 
(A) describes the use of the authority under paragraph 
(6) of section 5542(a) of title 5, United States Code, as 
added by subsection (a), including associated costs, and 
including an evaluation of the extent to which exercise 
Expiration date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00929
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4384 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
of the authority helped the Navy in meeting its mission; 
and 
(B) provides a recommendation on whether an exten-
sion of the provisions of that paragraph is needed. 
(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March 31, 2014, 
the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall 
submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate 
and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Oversight and Governmental Reform of the House of Rep-
resentatives a report that— 
(A) addresses the use of paragraph (6) of section 
5542(a) of title 5, United States Code, as so added, 
including associated costs, and including an evaluation of 
the extent to which exercise of the authority helped the 
Navy in meeting its mission; 
(B) describes the extent to which other employees 
experience the same circumstances as were experienced 
by those described in that paragraph before its enactment; 
(C) provides an analysis of the advantages and dis-
advantages that would be anticipated from extending the 
expiration date of the authority under that paragraph, 
and from expanding the authority under that paragraph 
to include other employees; and 
(D) conveys the report of the Secretary of the Navy 
referred to in paragraph (1). 
TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO 
FOREIGN NATIONS 
Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 
Sec. 1201. Expansion of authority for support of special operations to combat ter-
rorism. 
Sec. 1202. Addition of allied government agencies to enhanced logistics interoper-
ability authority. 
Sec. 1203. Expansion of temporary authority to use acquisition and cross-servicing 
agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces 
for personnel protection and survivability. 
Sec. 1204. Authority to pay personnel expenses in connection with African coopera-
tion. 
Sec. 1205. Authority to build the capacity of Yemen Ministry of Interior Counter 
Terrorism Forces. 
Sec. 1206. Air Force scholarships for Partnership for Peace nations to participate 
in the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program. 
Sec. 1207. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 
the capacity of foreign military forces. 
Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 
Sec. 1211. Limitation on availability of funds for certain purposes relating to Iraq. 
Sec. 1212. One-year extension and modification of Commanders’ Emergency Re-
sponse Program. 
Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 
support provided to United States military operations. 
Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense 
services to the military and security forces of Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1215. No permanent military bases in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1216. Authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1217. Authority to establish a program to develop and carry out infrastructure 
projects in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1218. Extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting operations 
in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1219. Recommendations on oversight of contractors engaged in activities relat-
ing to Afghanistan. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00930
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4385 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 1220. Extension and modification of Pakistan Counterinsurgency Fund. 
Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 
Sec. 1231. One-year extension of report on progress toward security and stability 
in Afghanistan. 
Sec. 1232. Two-year extension of United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan 
National Security Forces. 
Sec. 1233. Modification of report on responsible redeployment of United States 
Armed Forces from Iraq. 
Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense support for coalition operations. 
Sec. 1235. Reports on police training programs. 
Sec. 1236. Report on certain Iraqis affiliated with the United States. 
Sec. 1237. Report on Department of Defense’s plans to reform the export control 
system. 
Sec. 1238. Report on United States efforts to defend against threats posed by the 
anti-access and area-denial capabilities of certain nation-states. 
Sec. 1239. Defense Science Board report on Department of Defense strategy to 
counter violent extremism outside the United States. 
Sec. 1240. Report on merits of an Incidents at Sea agreement between the United 
States, Iran, and certain other countries. 
Sec. 1241. Requirement to monitor and evaluate Department of Defense activities 
to counter violent extremism in Africa. 
Sec. 1242. NATO Special Operations Headquarters. 
Sec. 1243. National Military Strategy to Counter Iran and required briefings. 
Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 
SEC. 1201. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT OF SPECIAL 
OPERATIONS TO COMBAT TERRORISM. 
Section 1208(a) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 
Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1202(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2511), is further amended by striking 
‘‘$40,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$45,000,000’’. 
SEC. 
1202. 
ADDITION 
OF 
ALLIED 
GOVERNMENT 
AGENCIES 
TO 
ENHANCED LOGISTICS INTEROPERABILITY AUTHORITY. 
(a) ENHANCED INTEROPERABILITY AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) 
of section 127d of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Subject to’’; 
(2) by inserting ‘‘of the United States’’ after ‘‘armed forces’’; 
(3) by striking the second sentence; and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(2) In addition to any logistic support, supplies, and services 
provided under paragraph (1), the Secretary may provide logistic 
support, supplies, and services to allied forces solely for the purpose 
of enhancing the interoperability of the logistical support systems 
of military forces participating in combined operations with the 
United States in order to facilitate such operations. Such logistic 
support, supplies, and services may also be provided under this 
paragraph to a nonmilitary logistics, security, or similar agency 
of an allied government if such provision would directly benefit 
the armed forces of the United States. 
‘‘(3) Provision of support, supplies, and services pursuant to 
paragraph (1) or (2) may be made only with the concurrence of 
the Secretary of State.’’. 
(b) CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ in para-
graphs (1) and (2) and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1)’’; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00931
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4386 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) in subsection (c)— 
(A) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph 
(2), the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘this section’’ and inserting ‘‘sub-
section (a)(1)’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘In addition’’ and 
all that follows through ‘‘fiscal year,’’ and inserting ‘‘The 
value of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided 
under subsection (a)(2) in any fiscal year may not’’. 
SEC. 1203. EXPANSION OF TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO USE ACQUISI-
TION AND CROSS-SERVICING AGREEMENTS TO LEND CER-
TAIN 
MILITARY 
EQUIPMENT 
TO 
CERTAIN 
FOREIGN 
FORCES FOR PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SURVIV-
ABILITY. 
(a) EXPANSION
FOR TRAINING
FOR DEPLOYMENT.—Paragraph 
(3) of section 1202(a) of the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 
Stat. 2412), as most recently amended by section 1252(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 402), is further amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘only in Iraq or Afghanistan, or in a peace-
keeping operation described in paragraph (1), as applicable, 
and’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘those forces.’’ and inserting ‘‘those forces 
and only— 
‘‘(A) in Iraq or Afghanistan; 
‘‘(B) in a peacekeeping operation described in para-
graph (1); or 
‘‘(C) in connection with the training of those forces 
to be deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, or a peacekeeping 
operation described in paragraph (1) for such deployment.’’. 
(b) 
NOTICE
AND
WAIT
ON
EXERCISE
OF
ADDITIONAL 
AUTHORITY.—Such section is further amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(5) NOTICE AND WAIT ON PROVISION OF EQUIPMENT FOR 
CERTAIN PURPOSES.—Equipment may not be provided under 
paragraph (1) in connection with training as specified in para-
graph (3)(C) until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary 
of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees 
written notice on the provision of such equipment for such 
purpose.’’. 
SEC. 1204. AUTHORITY TO PAY PERSONNEL EXPENSES IN CONNECTION 
WITH AFRICAN COOPERATION. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after section 1050 the following new section: 
‘‘§ 1050a. African cooperation: payment of personnel expenses 
‘‘The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military depart-
ment may pay the travel, subsistence, and special compensation 
of officers and students of African countries and other expenses 
that the Secretary considers necessary for African cooperation.’’. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00932
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4387 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 1050 the following new item: 
‘‘1050a. African cooperation: payment of personnel expenses.’’. 
SEC. 1205. AUTHORITY TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF YEMEN MINISTRY 
OF INTERIOR COUNTER TERRORISM FORCES. 
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the 
concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance during 
fiscal year 2011 to enhance the ability of the Yemen Ministry 
of Interior Counter Terrorism Forces to conduct counterterrorism 
operations against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and its affili-
ates. 
(b) TYPES OF ASSISTANCE.— 
(1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—Assistance under subsection 
(a) may include the provision of equipment, supplies, and 
training. 
(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—Assistance under subsection (a) 
shall be provided in a manner that promotes— 
(A) observance of and respect for human rights and 
fundamental freedoms; and 
(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority in Yemen. 
(3) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection 
(a) to provide any type of assistance described in this subsection 
that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law. 
(c) FUNDING.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated 
by section 301 for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011, 
$75,000,000 may be utilized to provide assistance under subsection 
(a). 
(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not less than 15 days before providing 
assistance under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the committees of Congress specified in paragraph 
(2) a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including 
the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, 
and the completion date for the provision of such assistance. 
(2) COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The committees of Con-
gress specified in this paragraph are— 
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations 
of the Senate; and 
(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee 
on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations 
of the House of Representatives. 
SEC. 1206. AIR FORCE SCHOLARSHIPS FOR PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE 
NATIONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EURO-NATO JOINT JET 
PILOT TRAINING PROGRAM. 
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
of the Air Force may establish and maintain a demonstration schol-
arship program to allow personnel of the air forces of countries 
that are signatories of the Partnership for Peace Framework Docu-
ment to receive undergraduate pilot training and necessary related 
training through the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) 
program. The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish the program 
Regulations. 
10 USC 1051 
note. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00933
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4388 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense 
in consultation with the Secretary of State. 
(b) TRANSPORTATION, SUPPLIES, AND ALLOWANCE.—Under such 
conditions as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe, the 
Secretary may provide to a person receiving a scholarship under 
the scholarship program— 
(1) transportation incident to the training received under 
the ENJJPT program; 
(2) supplies and equipment to be used during the training; 
(3) flight clothing and other special clothing required for 
the training; 
(4) billeting, food, and health services; and 
(5) a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the 
Secretary, taking into account the amount of living allowances 
authorized for a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
States under similar circumstances. 
(c) RELATION TO EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING PRO-
GRAM.— 
(1) ENJJPT STEERING COMMITTEE AUTHORITY.—Nothing in 
this section shall be construed or interpreted to supersede 
the authority of the ENJJPT Steering Committee under the 
ENJJPT Memorandum of Understanding. Pursuant to the 
ENJJPT Memorandum of Understanding, the ENJJPT Steering 
Committee may resolve to forbid any airman or airmen from 
a Partnership for Peace nation to participate in the Euro- 
NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training program under the authority 
of a scholarship under this section. 
(2) NO REPRESENTATION.—Countries whose air force per-
sonnel receive scholarships under the scholarship program shall 
not have privilege of ENJJPT Steering Committee representa-
tion. 
(d) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of the 
Air Force may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide 
assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that 
is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.) or 
any other provision of law. 
(e) COST-SHARING.—For purposes of ENJJPT cost-sharing, per-
sonnel of an air force of a foreign country who receive a scholarship 
under the scholarship program may be counted as United States 
pilots. 
(f) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 2012, the 
Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
Senate a report on the status of the demonstration program, 
including the opinion of the Secretary and NATO allies on the 
benefits of the program and whether or not to permanently 
authorize the program or extend the program beyond fiscal year 
2012. The report shall specify the following: 
(1) The countries participating in the scholarship program. 
(2) The total number of foreign pilots who received scholar-
ships under the scholarship program. 
(3) The amount expended on scholarships under the schol-
arship program. 
(4) The source of funding for scholarships under the scholar-
ship program. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00934
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4389 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(g) DURATION.—No scholarship may be awarded under the 
scholarship program after September 30, 2012. 
(h) FUNDING SOURCE.—Amounts to award scholarships under 
the scholarship program shall be derived from amounts authorized 
to be appropriated for operation and maintenance for the Air Force. 
SEC. 
1207. 
MODIFICATION 
AND 
EXTENSION 
OF 
AUTHORITIES 
RELATING TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF 
FOREIGN MILITARY FORCES. 
(a) TEMPORARY LIMITATION ON AMOUNT FOR BUILDING CAPACITY 
TO PARTICIPATE IN OR SUPPORT MILITARY AND STABILITY OPER-
ATIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public 
Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456), as added by section 1206(a) 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2514), is further amended— 
(A) by striking ‘‘and not more than’’ and inserting 
‘‘not more than’’; and 
(B) by inserting after ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ the following: 
‘‘, and not more than $100,000,000 may be used during 
fiscal year 2012’’. 
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph 
(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 
and shall apply with respect to programs under subsection 
(a) of such section that begin on or after that date. 
(b) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (g) of such 
section, as most recently amended by section 1206(c) of the Duncan 
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4625), is further amended by— 
(1) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2012’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 through 2011’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2006 through 2012’’. 
Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Iraq, 
Afghanistan, and Pakistan 
SEC. 1211. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 
PURPOSES RELATING TO IRAQ. 
No funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization of appro-
priations in this Act may be obligated or expended for a purpose 
as follows: 
(1) To establish any military installation or base for the 
purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United 
States Armed Forces in Iraq. 
(2) To exercise United States control of the oil resources 
of Iraq. 
SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF COM-
MANDERS’ EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM. 
(a) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERP AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) 
of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3455), as most recently 
amended by section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization 
Applicability. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00935
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4390 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2518), 
is further amended— 
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘FISCAL YEAR 
2010’’ and inserting ‘‘FISCAL YEAR 2011’’; 
(2) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 
2011’’; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘operation and maintenance’’ and all that 
follows and inserting ‘‘operation and maintenance— 
‘‘(1) not to exceed $100,000,000 may be used by the Sec-
retary of Defense in such fiscal year to provide funds for the 
Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Iraq; and 
‘‘(2) not to exceed $400,000,000 may be used by the Sec-
retary of Defense in such fiscal year to provide funds for the 
Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.’’. 
(b) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Subsection (a) of such section, as 
so amended, is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(3) FORM OF REPORTS.—Each report required under para-
graph (1) shall be submitted, at a minimum, in a searchable 
electronic format that enables the congressional defense 
committees to sort the report by amount expended, location 
of each project, type of project, or any other field of data 
that is included in the report.’’. 
(c) RESTRICTION ON AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS; NOTIFICATION.— 
Such section, as so amended, is further amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (i); and 
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new sub-
sections: 
‘‘(g) RESTRICTION
ON AMOUNT
OF PAYMENTS.—Funds made 
available under this section for the Commanders’ Emergency 
Response Program may not be obligated or expended to carry out 
any project if the total amount of funds made available for the 
purpose of carrying out the project, including any ancillary or 
related elements of the project, exceeds $20,000,000. 
‘‘(h) NOTIFICATION.—Not less than 15 days before obligating 
or expending funds made available under this section for the Com-
manders’ Emergency Response Program for a project in Afghanistan 
with a total anticipated cost of $5,000,000 or more, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a written notice containing the following information: 
‘‘(1) The location, nature, and purpose of the proposed 
project, including how the project is intended to advance the 
military campaign plan for Afghanistan. 
‘‘(2) The budget and implementation timeline for the pro-
posed project, including any other funding under the Com-
manders’ Emergency Response Program that has been or is 
anticipated to be contributed to the completion of the project. 
‘‘(3) A plan for the sustainment of the proposed project, 
including any agreement with either the Government of 
Afghanistan, a department or agency of the United States 
Government other than the Department of Defense, or a third 
party contributor to finance the sustainment of the activities 
and maintenance of any equipment or facilities to be provided 
through the proposed project’’. 
Deadline. 
Electronic 
submission. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00936
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4391 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(d) DEFINITION.—Subsection (i) of such section, as redesignated 
by subsection (c)(1) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘means 
the program’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘means the program 
that— 
‘‘(1) authorizes United States military commanders to carry 
out small-scale projects designed to meet urgent humanitarian 
relief requirements or urgent reconstruction requirements 
within their areas of responsibility; and 
‘‘(2) provides an immediate and direct benefit to the people 
of Iraq or Afghanistan.’’. 
SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CER-
TAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO 
UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS. 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 
(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as amended by section 1223 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2519), is further amended by striking 
‘‘section 1509(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1510 of the Ike Skelton National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’’. 
(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section, 
as so amended, is further amended in the second sentence by 
inserting ‘‘or 2011’’ after ‘‘fiscal year 2010’’. 
(c) EXCEPTION FROM NOTICE TO CONGRESS REQUIREMENTS.— 
Subsection (e) of such section, as so amended, is further amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary 
of Defense’’ and inserting the following: 
‘‘(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
the Secretary of Defense’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirement to provide notice under 
paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a reimbursement 
for access based on an international agreement.’’. 
(d) 
EXTENSION
OF
NOTICE
REQUIREMENT
RELATING
TO 
REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PAKI-
STAN.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended 
by section 1223 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010, is further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 
2011’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2012’’. 
SEC. 1214. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER DEFENSE ARTI-
CLES AND PROVIDE DEFENSE SERVICES TO THE MILI-
TARY AND SECURITY FORCES OF IRAQ AND AFGHANI-
STAN. 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of section 1234 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2532) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep-
tember 30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 
(b) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section is 
amended by striking ‘‘during fiscal year 2010’’ and inserting 
‘‘through March 31, 2012’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00937
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4392 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1215. NO PERMANENT MILITARY BASES IN AFGHANISTAN. 
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 
may be obligated or expended by the United States Government 
to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of 
providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed 
Forces in Afghanistan. 
SEC. 1216. AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR REINTEGRATION ACTIVI-
TIES IN AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence 
of the Secretary of State, may utilize not more than $50,000,000 
from funds made available to the Department of Defense for oper-
ation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011 to support the reintegra-
tion into Afghan society of those individuals who pledge— 
(1) to cease all support for the insurgency in Afghanistan; 
(2) to live in accordance with the Constitution of Afghani-
stan; 
(3) to cease violence against the Government of Afghanistan 
and its international partners; and 
(4) that they do not have material ties to al Qaeda or 
affiliated transnational terrorist organizations. 
(b) SUBMISSION OF GUIDANCE.— 
(1) INITIAL SUBMISSION.—Not later than 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy 
of the guidance issued by the Secretary or the Secretary’s 
designee concerning the allocation of funds utilizing the 
authority of subsection (a). Such guidance shall include— 
(A) mechanisms for coordination with the Government 
of Afghanistan and other United States Government 
departments and agencies as appropriate; and 
(B) mechanisms to track rates of recidivism among 
individuals described in subsection (a). 
(2) MODIFICATIONS.—If the guidance in effect for the pur-
pose stated in paragraph (1) is modified, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a copy of the modification not later than 15 days after the 
date on which such modification is made. 
(c) REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 
a report on activities carried out utilizing the authority of subsection 
(a). 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the congressional defense committees; and 
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep-
resentatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
Senate. 
(e) EXPIRATION.—The authority to utilize funds under sub-
section (a) shall expire at the close of December 31, 2011. 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00938
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4393 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1217. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND 
CARRY OUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANI-
STAN. 
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
of State are authorized to establish a program to develop and 
carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan in accordance with 
the requirements of this section. 
(b) FORMULATION AND EXECUTION OF PROGRAM.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State and the Secretary 
of Defense shall jointly develop any project under the program 
authorized under subsection (a). Except as provided in para-
graph (2), the Secretary of State, in coordination with the 
Secretary of Defense, shall implement any project under the 
program authorized under subsection (a). 
(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of Defense shall implement 
a project under the program authorized under subsection (a) 
if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly 
determine that the Secretary of Defense should implement 
the project. 
(c) TYPES OF PROJECTS.—Infrastructure projects under the pro-
gram authorized under subsection (a) may include— 
(1) water, power, and transportation projects; and 
(2) other projects in support of the counterinsurgency 
strategy in Afghanistan. 
(d) AUTHORITY
IN ADDITION
TO OTHER AUTHORITIES.—The 
authority to establish the program and develop and carry out infra-
structure projects under subsection (a) is in addition to any other 
authority to provide assistance to foreign countries. 
(e) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The administrative provisions of chapter 
2 of part III of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2381 et seq.) shall apply to funds made available to the Sec-
retary of State for purposes of carrying out infrastructure 
projects under the program authorized under subsection (a) 
to the same extent and in the same manner as such administra-
tive provisions apply to funds made available to carry out 
part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 
et seq.). 
(2) GIFTS, ETC.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
of State may accept and use in furtherance of the purposes 
of this section, money, funds, property, and services of any 
kind made available by gift, devise, bequest, grant, or otherwise 
for such purposes. 
(f) FUNDING.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may use up 
to $400,000,000 of funds made available to the Department 
of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011 
to carry out the program authorized under subsection (a). 
(2) AVAILABILITY.—Funds made available by paragraph (1) 
are authorized to remain available until September 30, 2012. 
(g) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall notify the appropriate congressional committees not less than 
30 days before obligating or expending funds to carry out a project 
or transferring funds to the Secretary of State for the purpose 
of implementing a project under the program authorized under 
subsection (a). Such notification shall be in writing and contain 
a description of the details of the proposed project, including— 
Deadline. 
Determination. 
22 USC 7513 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00939
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4394 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) a plan for the sustainment of the project; and 
(2) a description of how the project supports the counter-
insurgency strategy in Afghanistan. 
(h) RETURN OF UNEXPENDED FUNDS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Any unexpended funds transferred to 
the Secretary of State for the purpose of implementing a project 
under the program authorized under subsection (a) shall be 
returned to the Secretary of Defense if the Secretary of State, 
in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, determines that 
the project cannot be implemented for any reason or that the 
project no longer supports the counterinsurgency strategy in 
Afghanistan. 
(2) AVAILABILITY.—Any funds returned to the Secretary 
of Defense under this subsection shall be available for use 
under this section and shall be treated in the same manner 
as funds not transferred to the Secretary of State. 
(i) REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the 
end of each fiscal year in which funds are obligated, expended, 
or transferred under the program authorized under subsection 
(a), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary 
of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional commit-
tees a report regarding implementation of the program during 
such fiscal year. 
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under 
paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) The allocation and use of funds under the program 
during the fiscal year. 
(B) A description of each project for which funds were 
expended or transferred during the fiscal year. 
(j) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres-
sional committees’’ means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
House of Representatives; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of 
the Senate. 
SEC. 1218. EXTENSION OF LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR COALITION 
FORCES 
SUPPORTING 
OPERATIONS 
IN 
IRAQ 
AND 
AFGHANISTAN. 
Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394) is amended 
by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2008’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘fiscal year 2011’’. 
SEC. 1219. RECOMMENDATIONS ON OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTORS 
ENGAGED IN ACTIVITIES RELATING TO AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Special Inspector General 
for Afghanistan Reconstruction shall, in consultation with the 
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Inspector 
General of the United States Agency for International Development, 
and the Inspector General of the Department of State— 
(1) issue recommendations on measures to increase over-
sight of contractors engaged in activities relating to Afghani-
stan; 
Deadline. 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00940
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4395 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) report on the status of efforts of the Department of 
Defense, the United States Agency for International Develop-
ment, and the Department of State to implement existing rec-
ommendations regarding oversight of such contractors; and 
(3) report on the extent to which military and security 
contractors or subcontractors engaged in activities relating to 
Afghanistan have been responsible for the deaths of Afghan 
civilians. 
(b) ELEMENTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—The recommendations 
issued under subsection (a)(1) shall include recommendations for 
reducing the reliance of the United States on— 
(1) military and security contractors or subcontractors 
engaged in activities relating to Afghanistan that have been 
responsible for the deaths of Afghan civilians; and 
(2) Afghan militias or other armed groups that are not 
part of the Afghan National Security Forces. 
SEC. 1220. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF PAKISTAN COUNTER-
INSURGENCY FUND. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (h) of section 1224 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2521) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ 
both places it appears and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2011’’. 
(b) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF ASSISTANCE.—Subsection (b) of such 
section is amended— 
(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new para-
graph (2): 
‘‘(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance pro-
vided to the security forces of Pakistan under this section 
in a fiscal year after fiscal year 2010 shall be provided in 
a manner that promotes— 
‘‘(A) observance of and respect for human rights and 
fundamental freedoms; and 
‘‘(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority within 
Pakistan.’’. 
Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 
SEC. 1231. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD 
SECURITY AND STABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN. 
Section 1230(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385), as amended 
by section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–81; 123 Stat. 2535), is further 
amended by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 
SEC. 1232. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF UNITED STATES PLAN FOR SUS-
TAINING 
THE 
AFGHANISTAN 
NATIONAL 
SECURITY 
FORCES. 
Section 1231(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 390) is amended 
by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00941
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4396 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1233. MODIFICATION OF REPORT ON RESPONSIBLE REDEPLOY-
MENT OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM IRAQ. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Subsection (a) of section 1227 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2525; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting 
‘‘December 31, 2010’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘90 days thereafter’’ and inserting ‘‘180 
days thereafter’’. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘Multi-National Force– 
Iraq’’ each place it occurs and inserting ‘‘United States Forces– 
Iraq’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following: 
‘‘(6) An assessment of progress to transfer responsibility 
of programs, projects, and activities carried out in Iraq by 
the Department of Defense to other United States Government 
departments and agencies, international or nongovernmental 
entities, or the Government of Iraq. The assessment should 
include a description of the numbers and categories of pro-
grams, projects, and activities for which such other entities 
have taken responsibility or which have been discontinued by 
the Department of Defense. The assessment should also include 
a discussion of any difficulties or barriers in transitioning such 
programs, projects, and activities and what, if any, solutions 
have been developed to address such difficulties or barriers. 
‘‘(7) An assessment of progress toward the goal of building 
the minimum essential capabilities of the Ministry of Defense 
and the Ministry of the Interior of Iraq, including a description 
of— 
‘‘(A) such capabilities both extant and remaining to 
be developed; 
‘‘(B) major equipment necessary to achieve such 
capabilities; 
‘‘(C) the level and type of support provided by the 
United States to address shortfalls in such capabilities; 
and 
‘‘(D) the level of commitment, both financial and polit-
ical, made by the Government of Iraq to develop such 
capabilities, including a discussion of resources used by 
the Government of Iraq to develop capabilities that the 
Secretary determines are not minimum essential capabili-
ties for purposes of this paragraph. 
‘‘(8) A listing and assessment of the anticipated level and 
type of support to be provided by United States special oper-
ations forces to the Government of Iraq and Iraqi special oper-
ations forces during the redeployment of United States conven-
tional forces from Iraq. The assessment should include a listing 
of anticipated critical support from general purpose forces 
required by United States special operations forces and Iraqi 
special operations forces. The assessment should also include 
combat support, including rotary aircraft and intelligence, 
surveillance, and reconnaissance assets, combat service support, 
and contractor support needed through December 31, 2011.’’. 
(c) SECRETARY OF STATE COMMENTS.—Such section is further 
amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00942
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4397 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(c) SECRETARY OF STATE COMMENTS.—Prior to submitting the 
report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 
provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State for review. 
At the request of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense 
shall include an appendix to the report which contains any com-
ments or additional information that the Secretary of State 
requests.’’. 
(d) FORM.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking 
‘‘, whether or not included in another report on Iraq submitted 
to Congress by the Secretary of Defense,’’. 
(e) TERMINATION.—Such section is further amended by adding 
at the end the following: 
‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—The requirement to submit the report 
required under subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 
2012.’’. 
(f) REPEAL
OF OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—The fol-
lowing provisions of law are hereby repealed: 
(1) Section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3465; 
50 U.S.C. 1541 note) (as amended by section 1223 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 373)). 
(2) Section 1225 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 375). 
SEC. 1234. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT FOR 
COALITION OPERATIONS. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report 
on the implementation of the coalition support authorities of the 
Department of Defense during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Oper-
ation Enduring Freedom. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the purpose and use of each coalition 
support authority of the Department of Defense. 
(2) For the period of Operation Enduring Freedom ending 
on September 30, 2010, a summary of the amount of training, 
equipment, services, or other assistance provided or loaned 
under any coalition support authority of the Department of 
Defense set forth, for each such authority, by amount provided 
or loaned during each fiscal year of such period for each 
recipient country. 
(3) For the period of Operation Iraqi Freedom ending on 
September 30, 2010, a summary of the amount of training, 
equipment, services, or other assistance provided or loaned 
under any coalition support authority of the Department of 
Defense set forth, for each such authority, by amount provided 
or loaned during each fiscal year of such period for each 
recipient country. 
(4) An assessment of the effectiveness of each coalition 
support authority of the Department of Defense in meeting 
its intended purpose. 
(5) For each recipient country of coalition support under 
a coalition support authority of the Department of Defense— 
10 USC 113 note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00943
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4398 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) a description of the contribution of such country 
to coalition operations in Operation Enduring Freedom or 
Operating Iraqi Freedom; and 
(B) an assessment of the extent to which coalition 
support provided by the United States enhanced the ability 
of such country to participate in coalition operations in 
Operation Enduring Freedom or Operating Iraqi Freedom. 
(6) A description of the actions taken by the Department 
Defense to eliminate duplication and overlap in coalition sup-
port provided under the coalition support authorities of the 
Department of Defense. 
(7) An assessment by the Secretary of Defense whether 
there is an ongoing need for each coalition support authority 
of the Department of Defense, and an estimate of the antici-
pated future demand for coalition support under such coalition 
support authorities. 
(c) COALITION SUPPORT AUTHORITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘coalition support 
authorities of the Department of Defense’’ means the following: 
(1) Coalition Support Funds, including the authority to 
provide specialized training and loan specialized equipment 
under the Coalition Support Fund (commonly referred to as 
the ‘‘Coalition Readiness Support Program’’). 
(2) Lift and sustain authority under appropriations Acts 
or under section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394). 
(3) Global lift and sustain authority under section 127c 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(4) The authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and 
services to allied forces participating in combined operations 
under section 127d of title 10, United States Code. 
(5) The temporary authority to lend significant military 
equipment under acquisition and cross-servicing agreements 
pursuant to section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364). 
(6) The authority under section 1206 of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 
109–163) to provide assistance to build the capacity of foreign 
nations to support military or stability operations in which 
the United States Armed Forces are a participant. 
(7) Any other authority that the Secretary of Defense des-
ignates as a coalition support authority of the Department 
of Defense for purposes of the report required by subsection 
(a). 
SEC. 1235. REPORTS ON POLICE TRAINING PROGRAMS. 
(a) DOD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON AFGHAN NATIONAL 
POLICE TRAINING PROGRAM.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of 
the Department of Defense shall, in consultation with the 
Inspector General of the Department of State, submit to the 
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the Afghan 
National Police training program. 
(2) REVIEW.—In preparing the report required by paragraph 
(1), the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00944
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4399 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
conduct a review of the Afghan National Police training pro-
gram that focuses on developments since the Inspector General 
of the Department of Defense and the Inspector General of 
the Department of State released the report entitled ‘‘Depart-
ment of Defense Obligations and Expenditures of Funds Pro-
vided to the Department of State for the Training and Men-
toring of the Afghan National Police’’ (DODIG Report No. D– 
2010–042, DOSIG Report No. MERO–A–10–06, February 9, 
2010). 
(3) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by para-
graph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) A description of the components, planning, and 
scope of the Afghan National Police training program since 
the United States assumed control of the program in 2003. 
(B) A description of the cost to the United States 
of the Afghan National Police training program, including 
the source and amount of funding, and a description of 
the allocation of responsibility between the Department 
of Defense and the Department of State for funding the 
program. 
(C) A description of the allocation of responsibility 
between the Department of Defense and the Department 
of State for the oversight and execution of the program. 
(D) A description of the personnel and staffing require-
ments for overseeing and executing the program, both in 
the United States and in theater, including United States 
civilian government and military personnel, contractor per-
sonnel, and nongovernmental personnel, and non-United 
States civilian and military personnel, contractor personnel, 
and nongovernmental personnel. 
(E) An assessment of the cost, performance metrics, 
and planning associated with the transfer of administration 
of the contract for the Afghan National Police training 
program from the Department of State to the Department 
of Defense. 
(b) GAO REPORT ON USE OF GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL RATHER 
THAN CONTRACTORS FOR TRAINING AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE.— 
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 
a report on the use of United States Government personnel 
rather than contractors for the training of the Afghan National 
Police. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 
shall include the following: 
(A) A description of the roles and responsibilities of 
contractors and United States Government personnel in 
the Afghan National Police training program and a descrip-
tion of how the division of roles and responsibilities between 
such contractors and personnel has been determined. 
(B) An assessment of the relative advantages and dis-
advantages of using contractors or United States Govern-
ment personnel in the Afghan National Police training 
program, including an assessment of— 
(i) the shortfalls and inefficiencies, if any, in con-
tractor performance in the program; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00945
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4400 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(ii) options for leveraging United States Govern-
ment resources and capacity to address the shortfalls 
and inefficiencies described in clause (i) and to better 
address current and future needs under the program. 
(C) An assessment of the factors, such as oversight, 
cost considerations, performance, policy, and other factors, 
that would be impacted by transferring responsibilities for 
the performance of the Afghan National Police training 
program from contractors to United States Government 
personnel. 
(D) A review of the lessons learned from the execution 
and oversight of the police training program in Iraq, and 
any other relevant police training programs led by the 
Department of Defense, regarding the relative advantages 
and disadvantages of using United States Government per-
sonnel or contractors to carry out police training programs 
for foreign nations. 
(c) REPORT ON GOVERNMENT POLICE TRAINING AND EQUIPPING 
PROGRAMS.— 
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appro-
priate committees of Congress a report on United States 
Government police training and equipping programs outside 
the United States. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 
shall include the following: 
(A) A list of all United States Government departments 
and agencies involved in implementing police training and 
equipping programs. 
(B) A description of the scope, size, and components 
of all police training and equipping programs for fiscal 
years 2010 and 2011, to include for each such program— 
(i) the name of each country that received assist-
ance under the program; 
(ii) the types of recipient nation units receiving 
such assistance, including national police, gendarmerie, 
counternarcotics 
police, 
counterterrorism 
police, 
Formed Police Units, border security, and customs; 
(iii) the purpose and objectives of the program; 
(iv) the funding and personnel levels for the pro-
gram in each such fiscal year; 
(v) the authority under which the program is con-
ducted; 
(vi) the name of the United States Government 
department or agency with lead responsibility for the 
program and the mechanisms for oversight of the pro-
gram; 
(vii) the extent to which the program is imple-
mented by contractors or United States Government 
personnel; and 
(viii) the metrics for measuring the results of the 
program. 
(C) An assessment of the requirements for police 
training and equipping programs, and what changes, if 
any, are required to improve the capacity of the United 
States Government to meet such requirements. 
President. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00946
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4401 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(D) An evaluation of the appropriate role of United 
States Government departments and agencies in coordi-
nating on and carrying out police training and equipping 
programs. 
(E) An evaluation of the appropriate role of contractors 
in carrying out police training and equipping programs, 
and what modifications, if any, are needed to improve 
oversight of such contractors. 
(F) Recommendations for legislative modifications, if 
any, to existing authorities relating to police training and 
equipping programs. 
(d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 
section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 
(1) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Relations, 
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and Appropria-
tions of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, 
Oversight and Government Reform, and Appropriations of the 
House of Representatives. 
SEC. 1236. REPORT ON CERTAIN IRAQIS AFFILIATED WITH THE UNITED 
STATES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 
with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary 
of Homeland Security, the Administrator of the United States 
Agency for International Development, and the heads of other 
appropriate Federal agencies (as determined by the Secretary of 
Defense), shall submit to the Congress a report containing the 
information described in subsection (b). In preparing such report, 
the Secretary of Defense shall use available information from 
organizations and entities closely associated with the United States 
mission in Iraq that have received United States Government 
funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, 
or cooperative agreement. 
(b) INFORMATION.—The information described in this subsection 
is the following: 
(1) The number of Iraqis who were or are employed by 
the United States Government in Iraq or who are or were 
employed in Iraq by an organization or entity closely associated 
with the United States mission in Iraq that has received United 
States Government funding through an official and documented 
contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement. 
(2) The number of Iraqis who have applied— 
(A) for resettlement in the United States as a refugee 
under section 1243 of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 
2007 (subtitle C of title XII of division A of Public Law 
110–181; 122 Stat. 395 et seq.); 
(B) to enter the United States as a special immigrant 
under section 1244 of such Act; or 
(C) to enter the United States as a special immigrant 
under section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 8 U.S.C. 
1101 note). 
(3) The status of each application described in paragraph 
(2). 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00947
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4402 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) The estimated number of individuals described in para-
graph (1) who have been injured or killed in Iraq. 
(c) EXPEDITED PROCESSING.—The Secretary of Defense, the Sec-
retary of State, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
develop a plan using the report submitted under subsection (a) 
to expedite the processing of the applications described in subsection 
(b)(2) in the case of Iraqis at risk as the United States withdraws 
from Iraq. 
SEC. 1237. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’S PLANS TO 
REFORM THE EXPORT CONTROL SYSTEM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the Depart-
ment of Defense’s plans to implement the reforms to the United 
States export control system recommended by the interagency task 
force established at the direction of the President on August 13, 
2009. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under sub-
section (a) shall include an assessment of the extent to which 
the plans to reform the export control system will— 
(1) impact the Defense Technology Security Administration 
of the Department of Defense; 
(2) affect the role of the Department of Defense with respect 
to export control policy; and 
(3) ensure greater protection and monitoring of militarily 
critical technologies. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate. 
SEC. 1238. REPORT ON UNITED STATES EFFORTS TO DEFEND AGAINST 
THREATS POSED BY THE ANTI-ACCESS AND AREA-DENIAL 
CAPABILITIES OF CERTAIN NATION-STATES. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the 2010 report on the 
Department of Defense Quadrennial Defense Review concludes that 
‘‘[a]nti-access strategies seek to deny outside countries the ability 
to project power into a region, thereby allowing aggression or other 
destabilizing actions to be conducted by the anti-access power. 
Without dominant capabilities to project power, the integrity of 
United States alliances and security partnerships could be called 
into question, reducing United States security and influence and 
increasing the possibility of conflict’’. 
(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, 
in light of the finding in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense 
should ensure that the United States has the appropriate authori-
ties, capabilities, and force structure to defend against any potential 
future threats posed by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities 
of potentially hostile foreign countries. 
(c) REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2011, the Secretary of 
Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 
the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on United 
States efforts to defend against any potential future threats posed 
Plans. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00948
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4403 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile 
nation-states. 
(d) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (c) shall 
include the following: 
(1) An assessment of any potential future threats posed 
by the anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially 
hostile foreign countries, including an identification of the for-
eign countries with such capabilities, the nature of such 
capabilities, and the possible advances in such capabilities over 
the next 10 years. 
(2) A description of any efforts by the Department of 
Defense to address the potential future threats posed by the 
anti-access and area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile 
foreign countries. 
(3) A description of the authorities, capabilities, and force 
structure that the United States may require over the next 
10 years to address the threats posed by the anti-access and 
area-denial capabilities of potentially hostile foreign countries. 
(e) FORM.—The report required under subsection (c) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex 
if necessary. 
(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 
(1) the term ‘‘anti-access’’, with respect to capabilities, 
means any action that has the effect of slowing the deployment 
of friendly forces into a theater, preventing such forces from 
operating from certain locations within that theater, or causing 
such forces to operate from distances farther from the locus 
of conflict than such forces would normally prefer; and 
(2) the term ‘‘area-denial’’, with respect to capabilities, 
means operations aimed to prevent freedom of action of friendly 
forces in the more narrow confines of the area under a poten-
tially hostile nation-state’s direct control, including actions by 
an adversary in the air, on land, and on and under the sea 
to contest and prevent joint operations within a defended 
battlespace. 
SEC. 1239. DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF 
DEFENSE STRATEGY TO COUNTER VIOLENT EXTREMISM 
OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board shall 
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives a report on the strategy of the Depart-
ment of Defense to counter violent extremism outside the United 
States. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall 
include, at a minimum, the following: 
(1) A review of the current strategy, research activities, 
resource allocations, and organizational structure of the Depart-
ment of Defense for countering violent extremism outside the 
United States. 
(2) A review of interagency coordination and decision- 
making processes for executing and overseeing strategies and 
programs for countering violent extremism outside the United 
States. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00949
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4404 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) An analysis of alternatives and options available to 
the Department of Defense to counter violent extremism outside 
the United States. 
(4) An analysis of legal, policy, and strategy issues involving 
efforts to counter violent extremism outside the United States 
as such efforts potentially affect domestic efforts to interrupt 
radicalization efforts within the United States. 
(5) An analysis of the current information campaign of 
the Department of Defense against violent extremists outside 
the United States. 
(6) Such recommendations for further action to address 
the matters covered by the report as the Defense Science Board 
considers appropriate. 
(7) Such other matters as the Defense Science Board deter-
mines relevant. 
SEC. 1240. REPORT ON MERITS OF AN INCIDENTS AT SEA AGREEMENT 
BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES, IRAN, AND CERTAIN 
OTHER COUNTRIES. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 1 year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordina-
tion with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a report assessing the relative merits 
of a multilateral or bilateral Incidents at Sea military-to-military 
agreement between the United States, the Government of Iran, 
and other countries operating in the Persian Gulf aimed at pre-
venting accidental naval conflict in the Persian Gulf and the Strait 
of Hormuz. 
(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Such assessment should con-
sider and evaluate the current maritime security situation in the 
Persian Gulf and the effect that such an agreement might have 
on military and other maritime activities in the region, as well 
as other United States regional strategic interests. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 
SEC. 1241. REQUIREMENT TO MONITOR AND EVALUATE DEPARTMENT 
OF DEFENSE ACTIVITIES TO COUNTER VIOLENT EXTRE-
MISM IN AFRICA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation 
with the Secretary of State, shall monitor and evaluate the impact 
of United States Africa Command (USAFRICOM) Combined Joint 
Task Force-Horn of Africa’s (CJTF–HOA) activities to counter vio-
lent extremism in Africa, including civil affairs, psychological oper-
ations, humanitarian assistance, and operations to strengthen the 
capacity of partner nations. 
(b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the appropriate congressional committees a report on the following: 
(1) An evaluation of the impact of CJTF–HOA’s activities 
described in subsection (a) to advance United States security 
objectives in the Horn of Africa, including the extent to which 
CJTF–HOA’s activities— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00950
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4405 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) disrupt or deny terrorist networks; 
(B) combat violent extremist ideology; 
(C) are aligned with USAFRICOM’s mission; and 
(D) complement programs conducted by the United 
States Agency for International Development. 
(2) USAFRICOM’s efforts to monitor and evaluate the 
impact of CJTF–HOA’s activities described in subsection (a), 
including— 
(A) the means by which CJTF–HOA follows up on 
such activities to evaluate the effectiveness of such activi-
ties; 
(B) USAFRICOM’s specific assessments of CJTF– 
HOA’s activities; and 
(C) a description of plans by the Secretary of Defense 
to make permanent CJTF–HOA’s presence in Djibouti. 
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 
on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 
SEC. 1242. NATO SPECIAL OPERATIONS HEADQUARTERS. 
(a) IN
GENERAL.—Section 1244 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2541) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal 
year 2011’’; 
(B) by striking ‘‘pursuant to section 301(1)’’; and 
(C) 
by 
striking 
‘‘$30,000,000’’ 
and 
inserting 
‘‘$50,000,000’’; 
(2) in subsection (b)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘NATO Special Operations Coordination 
Center’’ and inserting ‘‘NATO Special Operations Head-
quarters’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘NSCC’’ and inserting ‘‘NSHQ’’; and 
(3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘NSCC’’ each place it 
appears and inserting ‘‘NSHQ’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section 
is amended by striking ‘‘NATO SPECIAL OPERATIONS COORDINATION 
CENTER’’ and inserting ‘‘NATO
SPECIAL
OPERATIONS
HEAD-
QUARTERS’’. 
SEC. 1243. NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY TO COUNTER IRAN AND 
REQUIRED BRIEFINGS. 
(a) NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall develop a strategy, to be known as the ‘‘National 
Military Strategy to Counter Iran’’. The strategy should— 
(1) provide strategic guidance for activities of the Depart-
ment of Defense that support the objective of countering threats 
posed by Iran; 
(2) undertake a review of the intelligence in the possession 
of the Department of Defense to develop a list of gaps in 
intelligence that limit the ability of the Department of Defense 
to counter threats emanating from Iran that the Secretary 
considers to be critical; 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00951
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4406 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) undertake a review of the ability of the Department 
of Defense to counter threats to the United States, its forces, 
allies, and interests from Iran, including— 
(A) contributions of the Department of Defense to the 
efforts of other agencies of the United States Government 
to counter or address the threat emanating from Iran; 
and 
(B) any gaps in the capabilities and authorities of 
the Department. 
(b) BRIEFINGS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 
shall brief the congressional defense committees in classified session 
regarding any resources, capabilities, or changes to current law 
the Secretary believes are necessary to address the gaps identified 
in the strategy required in subsection (a). 
TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT 
REDUCTION 
Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction programs and funds. 
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 
Sec. 1303. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 
countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 
Sec. 1304. Plan for nonproliferation, proliferation prevention, and threat reduction 
activities with the People’s Republic of China. 
SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
PROGRAMS AND FUNDS. 
(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PRO-
GRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this 
Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs 
specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). 
(b) FISCAL YEAR 2011 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS 
DEFINED.—As used in this title, the term ‘‘fiscal year 2011 Coopera-
tive Threat Reduction funds’’ means the funds appropriated pursu-
ant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 for 
Cooperative Threat Reduction programs. 
(c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 
the authorization of appropriations in section 301 for Cooperative 
Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for 
fiscal years 2011, 2012, and 2013. 
SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS. 
(a) FUNDING
FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—Of the $522,512,000 
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for 
fiscal year 2011 in section 301(20) for Cooperative Threat Reduction 
programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes 
specified: 
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination in Russia, 
$66,732,000. 
(2) For strategic nuclear arms elimination in Ukraine, 
$6,800,000. 
(3) For nuclear weapons storage security in Russia, 
$9,614,000. 
(4) For nuclear weapons transportation security in Russia, 
$45,000,000. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00952
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4407 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(5) For weapons of mass destruction proliferation preven-
tion in the states of the former Soviet Union, $79,821,000. 
(6) For biological threat reduction in the former Soviet 
Union, $209,034,000. 
(7) For chemical weapons destruction, $3,000,000. 
(8) For defense and military contacts, $5,000,000. 
(9) For Global Nuclear Lockdown, $74,471,000. 
(10) For activities designated as Other Assessments/ 
Administrative Costs, $23,040,000. 
(b) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR 
OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2011 Cooperative Threat Reduc-
tion funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than 
a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection (a) 
until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits 
to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will 
be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated 
or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed 
as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2011 
Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the 
obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited 
under this title or any other provision of law. 
(c) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO VARY INDIVIDUAL AMOUNTS.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case 
in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is nec-
essary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may 
obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2011 for a purpose 
listed in paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection (a) in excess 
of the specific amount authorized for that purpose. 
(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT
REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds 
for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection 
(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose 
may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) 
only after— 
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of 
the intent to do so together with a complete discussion 
of the justification for doing so; and 
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the 
notification. 
SEC. 1303. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 
CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF 
THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 
Not more than $500,000 of the fiscal year 2011 Cooperative 
Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended to establish 
a center of excellence in a country that is not a state of the 
former Soviet Union until the date that is 15 days after the date 
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report that includes the following: 
(1) An identification of the country in which the center 
will be located. 
(2) A description of the purpose for which the center will 
be established. 
(3) The agreement under which the center will operate. 
(4) A funding plan for the center, including— 
(A) the amount of funds to be provided by the govern-
ment of the country in which the center will be located; 
and 
Time period. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00953
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4408 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) the percentage of the total cost of establishing 
and operating the center the funds described in subpara-
graph (A) will cover. 
SEC. 1304. PLAN FOR NONPROLIFERATION, PROLIFERATION PREVEN-
TION, AND THREAT REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH THE 
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense and the Secretary of Energy shall jointly submit to 
the congressional defense committees a plan to carry out activities 
of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Pro-
gram and the Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Nonprolifera-
tion program relating to nonproliferation, proliferation prevention, 
and threat reduction with the Government of the People’s Republic 
of China during fiscal years 2011 through 2016. 
(b) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A description of the activities to be carried out under 
the plan. 
(2) A description of milestones and goals for such activities. 
(3) An estimate of the annual cost of such activities. 
(4) An estimate of the amount of the total cost of such 
activities to be provided by the Government of the People’s 
Republic of China. 
TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Programs 
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1402. Study on working capital fund cash balances. 
Sec. 1403. Modification of certain working capital fund requirements. 
Sec. 1404. Reduction of unobligated balances within the Pentagon Reservation 
Maintenance Revolving Fund. 
Sec. 1405. National Defense Sealift Fund. 
Sec. 1406. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 
Sec. 1407. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1408. Defense Inspector General. 
Sec. 1409. Defense Health Program. 
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 
Sec. 1411. Authorized uses of National Defense Stockpile funds. 
Sec. 1412. Revision to required receipt objectives for previously authorized dis-
posals from the National Defense Stockpile. 
Subtitle C—Chemical Demilitarization Matters 
Sec. 1421. Consolidation and reorganization of statutory authority for destruction 
of United States stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions. 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
Sec. 1431. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 
Sec. 1432. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Depart-
ment of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Cap-
tain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 
Subtitle A—Military Programs 
SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds in amounts as follows: 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00954
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4409 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) For the Defense Working Capital Funds, $160,965,000. 
(2) For the Defense Working Capital Fund, Defense Com-
missary, $1,273,571,000. 
SEC. 1402. STUDY ON WORKING CAPITAL FUND CASH BALANCES. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek 
to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and 
development center with appropriate expertise in revolving fund 
financial management to carry out a study to determine a sufficient 
operational level of cash that each revolving fund of the Department 
of Defense should maintain in order to sustain a single rate or 
price throughout the fiscal year. 
(b) CONTENTS OF STUDY.—In carrying out a study pursuant 
to a contract entered into under subsection (a), the federally funded 
research and development center shall— 
(1) qualitatively analyze the operational requirements and 
inherent risks associated with maintaining a specific level of 
cash within each revolving fund of the Department; 
(2) for each such revolving fund, take into consideration 
any effects on appropriation accounts that have occurred due 
to changes made in the rates charged by the fund during 
a fiscal year; 
(3) take into consideration direct input from the Secretary 
of Defense and officials of each of the military departments 
with leadership responsibility for financial management; 
(4) examine the guidance provided and regulations pre-
scribed by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of each 
of the military departments, as in effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act, including such guidance with respect 
to programming and budgeting and the annual budget displays 
provided to Congress; 
(5) examine the effects on appropriations accounts that 
have occurred due to congressional adjustments relating to 
excess cash balances in revolving funds; 
(6) identify best business practices from the private sector 
relating to sufficient cash balance reserves; 
(7) examine any relevant applicable laws, including the 
relevant body of work performed by the Government Account-
ability Office; and 
(8) address— 
(A) instances where the fiscal policy of the Department 
of Defense directly follows the law, as in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act, and instances where 
such policy is more restrictive with respect to the fiscal 
management of revolving funds than such law requires; 
(B) instances where current Department fiscal policy 
restricts the capability of a revolving fund to achieve the 
most economical and efficient organization and operation 
of activities; 
(C) fiscal policy adjustments required to comply with 
recommendations provided in the study, including proposed 
adjustments to— 
(i) the Department of Defense Financial Manage-
ment Regulation; 
(ii) published service regulations and instructions; 
and 
Contracts. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00955
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4410 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(iii) major command fiscal guidance; and 
(D) such other matters as determined relevant by the 
center carrying out the study. 
(c) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—The Secretary of Defense 
and the Secretary of each of the military departments shall make 
available to a federally funded research and development center 
carrying out a study pursuant to a contract entered into under 
subsection (a) all necessary and relevant information to allow the 
center to conduct the study in a quantitative and analytical manner. 
(d) REPORT.—Any contract entered into under subsection (a) 
shall provide that not later than 9 months after the date on which 
the Secretary of Defense enters into the contract, the chief executive 
officer of the entity that carries out the study pursuant to the 
contract shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 
the Senate and House of Representatives and the Secretary of 
Defense a final report on the study. The report shall include each 
of the following: 
(1) A description of the revolving fund environment, as 
of the date of the conclusion of the study, and the anticipated 
future environment, together with the quantitative data used 
in conducting the assessment of such environments under the 
study. 
(2) Recommended fiscal policy adjustments to support the 
initiatives identified in the study, including adjustments to— 
(A) the Department of Defense Financial Management 
Regulation; 
(B) published service regulations and instructions; and 
(C) major command fiscal guidance. 
(3) Recommendations with respect to any changes to any 
applicable law that would be appropriate to support the initia-
tives identified in the study. 
(e) SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS.—Not later than 90 days after 
the date of the submittal of the report under subsection (d), the 
Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of each of the military 
departments shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 
of the Senate and House of Representatives comments on the 
findings and recommendations contained in the report. 
SEC. 1403. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN WORKING CAPITAL FUND 
REQUIREMENTS. 
Section 2208 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting before the semicolon 
the following: ‘‘, including the cost of the procurement and 
qualification of technology-enhanced maintenance capabilities 
that improve either reliability, maintainability, sustainability, 
or supportability and have, at a minimum, been demonstrated 
to be functional in an actual system application or operational 
environment’’; and 
(2) in subsection (k)(2), by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$250,000’’. 
SEC. 1404. REDUCTION OF UNOBLIGATED BALANCES WITHIN THE PEN-
TAGON RESERVATION MAINTENANCE REVOLVING FUND. 
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer $53,000,000 from 
the unobligated balances of the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance 
Revolving Fund established under section 2674(e) of title 10, United 
Deadline. 
Deadline. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00956
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4411 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
States Code, to the Miscellaneous Receipts Fund of the United 
States Treasury. 
SEC. 1405. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal 
year 2011 for the National Defense Sealift Fund in the amount 
of $934,866,000. 
SEC. 1406. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for 
fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chem-
ical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, in the amount 
of $1,467,307,000, of which— 
(1) $1,067,364,000 is for Operation and Maintenance; 
(2) $392,811,000 is for Research, Development, Test, and 
Evaluation; and 
(3) $7,132,000 is for Procurement. 
(b) USE.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under sub-
section (a) are authorized for— 
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense 
Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521), as amended by section 
1421 of this Act; and 
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the 
United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such 
Act. 
SEC. 1407. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 
Defense-wide, in the amount of $1,160,851,000. 
SEC. 1408. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense, in the amount of $317,154,000. 
SEC. 1409. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Defense Health Program, in the amount of 
$30,959,611,000. 
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 
SEC. 1411. AUTHORIZED USES OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE 
FUNDS. 
(a) OBLIGATION OF STOCKPILE FUNDS.—During fiscal year 2011, 
the National Defense Stockpile Manager may obligate up to 
$41,181,000 of the funds in the National Defense Stockpile Trans-
action Fund established under subsection (a) of section 9 of the 
Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h) 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00957
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4412 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
for the authorized uses of such funds under subsection (b)(2) of 
such section, including the disposal of hazardous materials that 
are environmentally sensitive. 
(b) ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS.—The National Defense Stockpile 
Manager may obligate amounts in excess of the amount specified 
in subsection (a) if the National Defense Stockpile Manager notifies 
Congress that extraordinary or emergency conditions necessitate 
the additional obligations. The National Defense Stockpile Manager 
may make the additional obligations described in the notification 
after the end of the 45-day period beginning on the date on which 
Congress receives the notification. 
(c) LIMITATIONS.—The authorities provided by this section shall 
be subject to such limitations as may be provided in appropriations 
Acts. 
SEC. 1412. REVISION TO REQUIRED RECEIPT OBJECTIVES FOR PRE-
VIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DISPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL 
DEFENSE STOCKPILE. 
Section 3402(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most recently amended 
by section 1412(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 418), is amended 
by striking ‘‘$710,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$730,000,000’’. 
Subtitle C—Chemical Demilitarization 
Matters 
SEC. 1421. CONSOLIDATION AND REORGANIZATION OF STATUTORY 
AUTHORITY FOR DESTRUCTION OF UNITED STATES 
STOCKPILE OF LETHAL CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNI-
TIONS. 
(a) RESTATEMENT OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY WITH CONSOLIDA-
TION AND REORGANIZATION.—Section 1412 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521) is amended to read as 
follows: 
‘‘SEC. 1412. DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING STOCKPILE OF LETHAL CHEM-
ICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in accordance 
with the provisions of this section, carry out the destruction of 
the United States’ stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
that exists on November 8, 1985. 
‘‘(b) DATE FOR COMPLETION.—(1) The destruction of such stock-
pile shall be completed by the stockpile elimination deadline. 
‘‘(2) If the Secretary of Defense determines at any time that 
there will be a delay in meeting the requirement in paragraph 
(1) for the completion of the destruction of chemical weapons by 
the stockpile elimination deadline, the Secretary shall immediately 
notify the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives 
of that projected delay. 
‘‘(3) For purposes of this section, the term ‘stockpile elimination 
deadline’ means the deadline established by the Chemical Weapons 
Convention, but not later than December 31, 2017. 
‘‘(c) INITIATION OF DEMILITARIZATION OPERATIONS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may not initiate destruction of the chemical 
Definition. 
50 USC 98d note. 
Time period. 
Notification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00958
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4413 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
munitions stockpile stored at a site until the following support 
measures are in place: 
‘‘(1) Support measures that are required by Department 
of Defense and Army chemical surety and security program 
regulations. 
‘‘(2) Support measures that are required by the general 
and site chemical munitions demilitarization plans specific to 
that installation. 
‘‘(3) Support measures that are required by the permits 
required by the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 
et seq.) and the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) for 
chemical munitions demilitarization operations at that installa-
tion, as approved by the appropriate State regulatory agencies. 
‘‘(d) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND USE OF FACILITIES.— 
(1) In carrying out the requirement of subsection (a), the Secretary 
of Defense shall provide for— 
‘‘(A) maximum protection for the environment, the general 
public, and the personnel who are involved in the destruction 
of the lethal chemical agents and munitions referred to in 
subsection (a), including but not limited to the use of tech-
nologies and procedures that will minimize risk to the public 
at each site; and 
‘‘(B) adequate and safe facilities designed solely for the 
destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions. 
‘‘(2) Facilities constructed to carry out this section shall, when 
no longer needed for the purposes for which they were constructed, 
be disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations 
and mutual agreements between the Secretary of the Army and 
the Governor of the State in which the facility is located. 
‘‘(3)(A) Facilities constructed to carry out this section may not 
be used for a purpose other than the destruction of the stockpile 
of lethal chemical agents and munitions that exists on November 
8, 1985. 
‘‘(B) The prohibition in subparagraph (A) shall not apply with 
respect to items designated by the Secretary of Defense as lethal 
chemical agents, munitions, or related materials after November 
8, 1985, if the State in which a destruction facility is located 
issues the appropriate permit or permits for the destruction of 
such items at the facility. 
‘‘(e) GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—(1)(A) In order 
to carry out subsection (d)(1)(A), the Secretary of Defense may 
make grants to State and local governments and to tribal organiza-
tions (either directly or through the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency) to assist those governments and tribal organizations 
in carrying out functions relating to emergency preparedness and 
response in connection with the disposal of the lethal chemical 
agents and munitions referred to in subsection (a). Funds available 
to the Department of Defense for the purpose of carrying out this 
section may be used for such grants. 
‘‘(B) Additionally, the Secretary may provide funds through 
cooperative agreements with State and local governments, and with 
tribal organizations, for the purpose of assisting them in processing, 
approving, and overseeing permits and licenses necessary for the 
construction and operation of facilities to carry out this section. 
The Secretary shall ensure that funds provided through such a 
cooperative agreement are used only for the purpose set forth 
in the preceding sentence. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00959
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4414 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘tribal organization’ has the 
meaning given that term in section 4(l) of the Indian Self-Deter-
mination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(l)). 
‘‘(2)(A) In coordination with the Secretary of the Army and 
in accordance with agreements between the Secretary of the Army 
and the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, the Administrator shall carry out a program to provide 
assistance to State and local governments in developing capabilities 
to respond to emergencies involving risks to the public health 
or safety within their jurisdictions that are identified by the Sec-
retary as being risks resulting from— 
‘‘(i) the storage of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
referred to in subsection (a) at military installations in the 
continental United States; or 
‘‘(ii) the destruction of such agents and munitions at facili-
ties referred to in subsection (d)(1)(B). 
‘‘(B) Assistance may be provided under this paragraph for 
capabilities to respond to emergencies involving an installation 
or facility as described in subparagraph (A) until the earlier of 
the following: 
‘‘(i) The date of the completion of all grants and cooperative 
agreements with respect to the installation or facility for pur-
poses of this paragraph between the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency and the State and local governments con-
cerned. 
‘‘(ii) The date that is 180 days after the date of the comple-
tion of the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions 
at the installation or facility. 
‘‘(C) Not later than December 15 of each year, the Administrator 
shall transmit a report to Congress on the activities carried out 
under this paragraph during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal 
year in which the report is submitted. 
‘‘(f) REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGIC PLAN.—(1) The Under Sec-
retary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and 
the Secretary of the Army shall jointly prepare, and from time 
to time shall update as appropriate, a strategic plan for future 
activities for destruction of the United States’ stockpile of lethal 
chemical agents and munitions. 
‘‘(2) The plan shall include, at a minimum, the following consid-
erations: 
‘‘(A) Realistic budgeting for stockpile destruction and 
related support programs. 
‘‘(B) Contingency planning for foreseeable or anticipated 
problems. 
‘‘(C) A management approach and associated actions that 
address compliance with the obligations of the United States 
under the Chemical Weapons Convention and that take full 
advantage of opportunities to accelerate destruction of the 
stockpile. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall each year submit to the 
Committee on the Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the strategic 
plan as most recently prepared and updated under paragraph (1). 
Such submission shall be made each year at the time of the submis-
sion to the Congress that year of the President’s budget for the 
next fiscal year. 
Deadlines. 
Reports. 
Deadlines. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00960
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4415 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(g) MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION.—(1) In carrying out this sec-
tion, the Secretary of Defense shall provide for a management 
organization within the Department of the Army. The Secretary 
of the Army shall be responsible for management of the destruction 
of agents and munitions at all sites except Blue Grass Army Depot, 
Kentucky, and Pueblo Chemical Depot, Colorado 
‘‘(2) The program manager for the Assembled Chemical 
Weapons Alternative Program shall be responsible for management 
of the construction, operation, and closure, and any contracting 
relating thereto, of chemical demilitarization activities at Blue 
Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, and Pueblo Army Depot, Colorado, 
including management of the pilot-scale facility phase of the alter-
native technology selected for the destruction of lethal chemical 
munitions. In performing such management, the program manager 
shall act independently of the Army program manager for Chemical 
Demilitarization and shall report to the Under Secretary of Defense 
for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics 
‘‘(3) The Secretary of Defense shall designate a general officer 
or civilian equivalent as the director of the management organiza-
tion established under paragraph (1). Such officer shall have— 
‘‘(A) experience in the acquisition, storage, and destruction 
of chemical agents and munitions; and 
‘‘(B) outstanding qualifications regarding safety in handling 
chemical agents and munitions. 
‘‘(h) IDENTIFICATION
OF FUNDS.—(1) Funds for carrying out 
this section, including funds for military construction projects nec-
essary to carry out this section, shall be set forth in the budget 
of the Department of Defense for any fiscal year as a separate 
account. Such funds shall not be included in the budget accounts 
for any military department. 
‘‘(2) Amounts appropriated to the Secretary of Defense for the 
purpose of carrying out subsection (e) shall be promptly made 
available to the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Manage-
ment Agency. 
‘‘(i) ANNUAL REPORTS.—(1) Except as provided by paragraph 
(3), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit, by December 15 each 
year, a report to Congress on the activities carried out under this 
section during the fiscal year ending on September 30 of the cal-
endar year in which the report is to be made. 
‘‘(2) Each annual report shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) A site-by-site description of the construction, equip-
ment, operation, and dismantling of facilities (during the fiscal 
year for which the report is made) used to carry out the destruc-
tion of agents and munitions under this section, including any 
accidents or other unplanned occurrences associated with such 
construction and operation. 
‘‘(B) A site-by-site description of actions taken to assist 
State and local governments (either directly or through the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency) in carrying out func-
tions relating to emergency preparedness and response in 
accordance with subsection (e). 
‘‘(C) An accounting of all funds expended (during such 
fiscal year) for activities carried out under this section, with 
a separate accounting for amounts expended for— 
‘‘(i) the construction of and equipment for facilities 
used for the destruction of agents and munitions; 
‘‘(ii) the operation of such facilities; 
Establishment. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00961
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4416 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(iii) the dismantling or other closure of such facilities; 
‘‘(iv) research and development; 
‘‘(v) program management; 
‘‘(vi) travel and associated travel costs for Citizens’ 
Advisory Commissioners under subsection (m)(7); and 
‘‘(vii) grants to State and local governments to assist 
those governments in carrying out functions relating to 
emergency preparedness and response in accordance with 
subsection (e). 
‘‘(D) An assessment of the safety status and the integrity 
of the stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions subject 
to this section, including— 
‘‘(i) an estimate on how much longer that stockpile 
can continue to be stored safely; 
‘‘(ii) a site-by-site assessment of the safety of those 
agents and munitions; and 
‘‘(iii) a description of the steps taken (to the date of 
the report) to monitor the safety status of the stockpile 
and to mitigate any further deterioration of that status. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary shall transmit the final report under para-
graph (1) not later than 120 days following the completion of activi-
ties under this section. 
‘‘(j) SEMIANNUAL REPORTS.—(1) Not later than March 1 and 
September 1 each year until the year in which the United States 
completes the destruction of its entire stockpile of chemical weapons 
under the terms of the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the members and committees of Congress 
referred to in paragraph (3) a report on the implementation by 
the United States of its chemical weapons destruction obligations 
under the Chemical Weapons Convention. 
‘‘(2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) The anticipated schedule at the time of such report 
for the completion of destruction of chemical agents, munitions, 
and materiel at each chemical weapons demilitarization facility 
in the United States. 
‘‘(B) A description of the options and alternatives for accel-
erating the completion of chemical weapons destruction at each 
such facility, particularly in time to meet the stockpile elimi-
nation deadline. 
‘‘(C) A description of the funding required to achieve each 
of the options for destruction described under subparagraph 
(B), and a detailed life-cycle cost estimate for each of the 
affected facilities included in each such funding profile. 
‘‘(D) A description of all actions being taken by the United 
States to accelerate the destruction of its entire stockpile of 
chemical weapons, agents, and materiel in order to meet the 
current stockpile elimination deadline under the Chemical 
Weapons Convention of April 29, 2012, or as soon thereafter 
as possible. 
‘‘(3) The members and committees of Congress referred to in 
this paragraph are— 
‘‘(A) the majority leader and the minority leader of the 
Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Com-
mittee on Appropriations of the Senate; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00962
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4417 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(B) the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the 
majority leader and the minority leader of the House of Rep-
resentatives, and the Committee on Armed Services and the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 
‘‘(k) AUTHORIZED USE OF TOXIC CHEMICALS.—Consistent with 
United States obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention, 
the Secretary of Defense may develop, produce, otherwise acquire, 
retain, transfer, and use toxic chemicals and their precursors for 
purposes not prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention if 
the types and quantities of such chemicals and precursors are 
consistent with such purposes, including for protective purposes 
such as protection against toxic chemicals and protection against 
chemical weapons. 
‘‘(l) SURVEILLANCE AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.—The Secretary 
of Defense shall conduct an ongoing comprehensive program of— 
‘‘(1) surveillance of the existing United States stockpile 
of chemical weapons; and 
‘‘(2) assessment of the condition of the stockpile. 
‘‘(m) CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMIS-
SIONS.—(1)(A) The Secretary of the Army shall establish a citizens’ 
commission for each State in which there is a chemical demilitariza-
tion facility under Army management. 
‘‘(B) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, 
and Biological Defense Programs shall establish a chemical demili-
tarization citizens’ commission in Colorado and in Kentucky. 
‘‘(C) Each commission under this subsection shall be known 
as the ‘Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission’ 
for the State concerned. 
‘‘(2)(A) The Secretary of the Army, or the Department of Defense 
with respect to Colorado and Kentucky, shall provide for a rep-
resentative to meet with each commission established under this 
subsection to receive citizen and State concerns regarding the 
ongoing program for the disposal of the lethal chemical agents 
and munitions in the stockpile referred to in subsection (a) at 
each of the sites with respect to which a commission is established 
pursuant to paragraph (1). 
‘‘(B) The Secretary of the Army shall provide for a representa-
tive from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisi-
tion, Logistics, and Technology) to meet with each commission under 
Army management. 
‘‘(C) The Department of Defense shall provide for a representa-
tive from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs to meet with 
the commissions in Colorado and Kentucky. 
‘‘(3)(A) Each commission under this subsection shall be com-
posed of nine members appointed by the Governor of the State. 
Seven of such members shall be citizens from the local affected 
areas in the State. The other two shall be representatives of State 
government who have direct responsibilities related to the chemical 
demilitarization program. 
‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph, affected areas are those 
areas located within a 50-mile radius of a chemical weapons storage 
site. 
‘‘(4) For a period of five years after the termination of any 
commission under this subsection, no corporation, partnership, or 
other organization in which a member of that commission, a spouse 
of a member of that commission, or a natural or adopted child 
Time period. 
Colorado. 
Kentucky. 
Establishment. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00963
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4418 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
of a member of that commission has an ownership interest may 
be awarded— 
‘‘(A) a contract related to the disposal of lethal chemical 
agents or munitions in the stockpile referred to in subsection 
(a); or 
‘‘(B) a subcontract under such a contract. 
‘‘(5) The members of each commission under this subsection 
shall designate the chair of such commission from among the mem-
bers of such commission. 
‘‘(6) Each commission under this subsection shall meet with 
a representative from the Army, or the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense 
Programs with respect to the commissions in Colorado and Ken-
tucky, upon joint agreement between the chair of such commission 
and that representative. The two parties shall meet not less often 
than twice a year and may meet more often at their discretion. 
‘‘(7) Members of each commission under this subsection shall 
receive no pay for their involvement in the activities of their 
commissions. Funds appropriated for the Chemical Stockpile 
Demilitarization Program may be used for travel and associated 
travel costs for commissioners of commissions under this subsection 
when such travel is conducted at the invitation of the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology) or 
the invitation of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, 
Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs for the commissions 
in Colorado and Kentucky. 
‘‘(8) Each commission under this subsection shall be terminated 
after the closure activities required pursuant to regulations pre-
scribed by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency pursuant to the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 
et seq.) have been completed for the chemical agent destruction 
facility in such commission’s State, or upon the request of the 
Governor of such commission’s State, whichever occurs first. 
‘‘(n) INCENTIVE CLAUSES IN CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CON-
TRACTS.—(1)(A) The Secretary of Defense may, for the purpose 
specified in paragraph (B), authorize the inclusion of an incentives 
clause in any contract for the destruction of the United States 
stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions carried out pursu-
ant to subsection (a). 
‘‘(B) The purpose of a clause referred to in subparagraph (A) 
is to provide the contractor for a chemical demilitarization facility 
an incentive to accelerate the safe elimination of the United States 
chemical weapons stockpile and to reduce the total cost of the 
Chemical Demilitarization Program by providing incentive pay-
ments for the early completion of destruction operations and the 
closure of such facility. 
‘‘(2)(A) An incentives clause under this subsection shall permit 
the contractor for the chemical demilitarization facility concerned 
the opportunity to earn incentive payments for the completion of 
destruction operations and facility closure activities within target 
incentive ranges specified in such clause. 
‘‘(B) The maximum incentive payment under an incentives 
clause with respect to a chemical demilitarization facility may not 
exceed the following amounts: 
‘‘(i) In the case of an incentive payment for the completion 
of destruction operations within the target incentive range 
specified in such clause, $110,000,000. 
Termination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00964
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4419 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(ii) In the case of an incentive payment for the completion 
of facility closure activities within the target incentive range 
specified in such clause, $55,000,000. 
‘‘(C) An incentives clause in a contract under this section shall 
specify the target incentive ranges of costs for completion of destruc-
tion operations and facility closure activities, respectively, as jointly 
agreed upon by the contracting officer and the contractor concerned. 
An incentives clause shall require a proportionate reduction in 
the maximum incentive payment amounts in the event that the 
contractor exceeds an agreed-upon target cost if such excess costs 
are the responsibility of the contractor. 
‘‘(D) The amount of the incentive payment earned by a con-
tractor for a chemical demilitarization facility under an incentives 
clause under this subsection shall be based upon a determination 
by the Secretary on how early in the target incentive range specified 
in such clause destruction operations or facility closure activities, 
as the case may be, are completed. 
‘‘(E) The provisions of any incentives clause under this sub-
section shall be consistent with the obligation of the Secretary 
of Defense under subsection (d)(1)(A), to provide for maximum 
protection for the environment, the general public, and the per-
sonnel who are involved in the destruction of the lethal chemical 
agents and munitions. 
‘‘(F) In negotiating the inclusion of an incentives clause in 
a contract under this subsection, the Secretary may include in 
such clause such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary 
considers appropriate. 
‘‘(3)(A) No payment may be made under an incentives clause 
under this subsection unless the Secretary determines that the 
contractor concerned has satisfactorily performed its duties under 
such incentives clause. 
‘‘(B) An incentives clause under this subsection shall specify 
that the obligation of the Government to make payment under 
such incentives clause is subject to the availability of appropriations 
for that purpose. Amounts appropriated for Chemical Agents and 
Munitions Destruction, Defense, shall be available for payments 
under incentives clauses under this subsection. 
‘‘(o) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘chemical agent and munition’ means an 
agent or munition that, through its chemical properties, pro-
duces lethal or other damaging effects on human beings, except 
that such term does not include riot control agents, chemical 
herbicides, smoke and other obscuration materials. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘Chemical Weapons Convention’ means the 
Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production, 
Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their 
Destruction, with annexes, done at Paris, January 13, 1993, 
and entered into force April 29, 1997 (T. Doc. 103–21). 
‘‘(3) The term ‘lethal chemical agent and munition’ means 
a chemical agent or munition that is designed to cause death, 
through its chemical properties, to human beings in field con-
centrations. 
‘‘(4) The term ‘destruction’ means, with respect to chemical 
munitions or agents— 
‘‘(A) the demolishment of such munitions or agents 
by incineration or by any other means; or 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00965
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4420 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(B) the dismantling or other disposal of such muni-
tions or agents so as to make them useless for military 
purposes and harmless to human beings under normal 
circumstances.’’. 
(b) REPEAL OF LAWS RESTATED IN SECTION 1412 AND OBSOLETE 
PROVISIONS OF LAW.—The following provisions of law are repealed: 
(1) Section 125 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law 100–180; 101 
Stat. 1043; 50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(2) Sections 172, 174, 175, and 180 of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 
106 Stat. 2341; 50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(3) Section 152 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(4) Section 8065 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropria-
tions Act, 1997 (50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(5) Section 142 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(6) Section 141 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 537; 50 
U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(7) Section 8122 of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 2003 (Public Law 107–248; 116 Stat. 1566; 50 U.S.C. 
1521 note). 
(8) Section 923 of the John Warner National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 
120 Stat. 2360; 50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
(9) Section 8119 of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–116; 121 Stat. 1340; 50 U.S.C. 
1521 note). 
(10) Section 922(c) of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 283; 
50 U.S.C. 1521 note). 
Subtitle D—Other Matters 
SEC. 1431. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 
RETIREMENT HOME. 
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the 
sum of $71,200,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retire-
ment Home. 
SEC. 1432. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPART-
MENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN 
JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 
(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the funds author-
ized to be appropriated by section 1409 and available for the Defense 
Health Program for operation and maintenance, $132,000,000 may 
be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department 
of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Dem-
onstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection 
(a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00966
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4421 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
as amounts authorized and appropriated for the Department of 
Defense specifically for such transfer. 
(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For purposes of subsection 
(b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds trans-
ferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the 
Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting 
of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy 
Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as 
a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement 
pursuant to section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 455). 
TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDI-
TIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVER-
SEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 
Sec. 1501. Purpose. 
Sec. 1502. Army procurement. 
Sec. 1503. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
Sec. 1504. Navy and Marine Corps procurement. 
Sec. 1505. Air Force procurement. 
Sec. 1506. Defense-wide activities procurement. 
Sec. 1507. National Guard and Reserve equipment. 
Sec. 1508. Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund. 
Sec. 1509. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 
Sec. 1510. Operation and maintenance. 
Sec. 1511. Military personnel. 
Sec. 1512. Working capital funds. 
Sec. 1513. Defense Health Program. 
Sec. 1514. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 
Sec. 1515. Defense Inspector General. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 
Sec. 1531. Limitations on availability of funds in Afghanistan Security Forces 
Fund. 
Sec. 1532. Limitations on availability of funds in Iraq Security Forces Fund. 
Sec. 1533. Continuation of prohibition on use of United States funds for certain fa-
cilities projects in Iraq. 
Sec. 1534. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 
Sec. 1535. Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan and 
economic transition plan and economic strategy for Afghanistan. 
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional 
Appropriations 
SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for 
the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2011 to provide additional 
funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by 
the Armed Forces. 
SEC. 1502. ARMY PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for procurement accounts of the Army in amounts as follows: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00967
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4422 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) For aircraft procurement, $1,373,803,000. 
(2) For missile procurement, $343,828,000. 
(3) For weapons and tracked combat vehicles procurement, 
$687,500,000. 
(4) For ammunition procurement, $384,441,000. 
(5) For other procurement, $5,827,274,000. 
SEC. 1503. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund in 
the amount of $3,465,868,000. 
SEC. 1504. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for procurement accounts of the Navy and Marine Corps 
in amounts as follows: 
(1) For aircraft procurement, Navy, $420,358,000. 
(2) For weapons procurement, Navy, $93,425,000. 
(3) For ammunition procurement, Navy and Marine Corps, 
$565,084,000. 
(4) For other procurement, Navy, $480,735,000. 
(5) For procurement, Marine Corps, $1,705,069,000. 
SEC. 1505. AIR FORCE PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for procurement accounts of the Air Force in amounts as 
follows: 
(1) For aircraft procurement, $1,096,520,000. 
(2) For ammunition procurement, $292,959,000. 
(3) For missile procurement, $56,621,000. 
(4) For other procurement, $2,992,681,000. 
SEC. 1506. DEFENSE-WIDE ACTIVITIES PROCUREMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the procurement account for Defense-wide activities in 
the amount of $844,546,000. 
SEC. 1507. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the procurement of aircraft, missiles, wheeled and tracked 
combat vehicles, tactical wheeled vehicles, ammunition, other 
weapons, and other procurement for the reserve components of 
the Armed Forces in the amount of $700,000,000. 
SEC. 1508. MINE RESISTANT AMBUSH PROTECTED VEHICLE FUND. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle Fund in 
the amount of $3,415,000,000. 
SEC. 1509. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, develop-
ment, test, and evaluation as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $150,906,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $60,401,000. 
(3) For the Air Force, $266,241,000. 
(4) For Defense-wide activities, $661,240,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00968
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4423 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1510. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Armed Forces for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for operation and maintenance, in amounts as follows: 
(1) For the Army, $63,202,618,000. 
(2) For the Navy, $8,692,173,000. 
(3) For the Marine Corps, $4,136,522,000. 
(4) For the Air Force, $13,487,283,000 
(5) For Defense-wide activities, $9,436,358,000. 
(6) For the Army Reserve, $286,950,000. 
(7) For the Navy Reserve, $93,559,000. 
(8) For the Marine Corps Reserve, $29,685,000. 
(9) For the Air Force Reserve, $129,607,000. 
(10) For the Army National Guard, $544,349,000. 
(11) For the Air National Guard, $350,823,000. 
(12) 
For 
the 
Afghanistan 
Security 
Forces 
Fund, 
$11,619,283,000. 
(13) For the Iraq Security Forces Fund, $1,500,000,000. 
(14) For the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer 
Fund, $506,781,000. 
SEC. 1511. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the Department of Defense for military personnel in the 
amount of $15,275,502,000. 
SEC. 1512. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and 
agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for 
working capital and revolving funds in the amount of $485,384,000. 
SEC. 1513. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Defense Health Program in the amount of 
$1,398,092,000 for operation and maintenance. 
SEC. 1514. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, 
DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 
Defense-wide in the amount of $457,110,000. 
SEC. 1515. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Depart-
ment of Defense for fiscal year 2011 for expenses, not otherwise 
provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Depart-
ment of Defense in the amount of $10,529,000. 
Subtitle B—Financial Matters 
SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are 
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated 
by this Act. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00969
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4424 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 
(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of 
Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, 
the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made 
available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal 
year 2011 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year 
(or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so 
transferred shall be merged with and be available for the 
same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 
(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that 
the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this sub-
section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 
(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this section shall 
be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under 
section 1001. 
(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided 
by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided 
under section 1001. 
Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters 
SEC. 1531. LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN AFGHANISTAN 
SECURITY FORCES FUND. 
(a) APPLICATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS.—Funds made avail-
able to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security 
Forces Fund for fiscal year 2011 shall be subject to the conditions 
contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by subsection (b) of 
this section. 
(b) MODIFICATION OF PRIOR NOTICE AND REPORTING REQUIRE-
MENTS.—Section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428) is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘five days’’ and inserting 
‘‘15 days’’; and 
(2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary may treat a report submitted 
under section 9010 of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–118; 123 Stat. 3466), or a 
successor provision of law, with respect to a fiscal-year quarter 
as satisfying the requirements for a report under this subsection 
for that fiscal-year quarter.’’. 
SEC. 1532. LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN IRAQ SECU-
RITY FORCES FUND. 
(a) APPLICATION
OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS.—Subject to sub-
section (b), funds made available to the Department of Defense 
for the Iraq Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2011 shall be 
subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) 
of section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 426), as amended by 
subsection (d) of this section. 
(b) COST-SHARE REQUIREMENT.— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00970
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4425 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) REQUIREMENT.—If funds made available to the Depart-
ment of Defense for the Iraq Security Forces Fund for fiscal 
year 2011 are used for the purchase of any item or service 
for Iraq Security Forces, the funds may not cover more than 
80 percent of the cost of the item or service. 
(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) does not apply to any item 
that the Secretary of Defense determines— 
(A) is an item of significant military equipment (as 
such term is defined in section 47(9) of the Arms Export 
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794(9))); or 
(B) is included on the United States Munitions List, 
as designated pursuant to section 38(a)(1) of the Arms 
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1)). 
(c) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS PENDING CERTAIN 
COMMITMENT BY GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ.— 
(1) LIMITATION.—Of the amount available to the Iraq Secu-
rity Forces Fund as described in subsection (a), not more than 
$1,000,000,000 may be obligated until the Secretary of Defense 
certifies to Congress that the Government of Iraq has dem-
onstrated a commitment to each of the following: 
(A) To adequately build the logistics and maintenance 
capacity of the Iraqi security forces. 
(B) To develop the institutional capacity to manage 
such forces independently. 
(C) To develop a culture of sustainment for equipment 
provided by the United States or acquired with United 
States assistance. 
(2) BASIS FOR CERTIFICATION.—The certification of the Sec-
retary under paragraph (1) shall include a description of the 
actions taken by the Government of Iraq that, in the determina-
tion of the Secretary, support the certification. 
(d) MODIFICATION OF PRIOR NOTICE AND REPORTING REQUIRE-
MENTS.—Section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 426) is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘five days’’ and inserting 
‘‘15 days’’; and 
(2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary may treat a report submitted 
under section 9010 of the Department of Defense Appropria-
tions Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–118; 123 Stat. 3466), or a 
successor provision of law, with respect to a fiscal-year quarter 
as satisfying the requirements for a report under this subsection 
for that fiscal-year quarter.’’. 
SEC. 1533. CONTINUATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF UNITED 
STATES FUNDS FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES PROJECTS IN 
IRAQ. 
Section 1508(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4651) shall apply to funds authorized to be appropriated 
by this title. 
SEC. 1534. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 
(a) USE
AND TRANSFER
OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) 
of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), 
as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the 
Applicability. 
Applicability. 
Certification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00971
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4426 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the 
funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint 
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2011. 
(b) MONTHLY OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.— 
(1) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than 15 days after the 
end of each month of fiscal year 2011, the Secretary of Defense 
shall provide to the congressional defense committees a report 
on the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund 
explaining monthly commitments, obligations, and expenditures 
by line of action. 
(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Sec-
tion 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439) 
is amended by striking subsection (e). 
SEC. 1535. TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND STABILITY OPERATIONS 
IN AFGHANISTAN AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION PLAN AND 
ECONOMIC STRATEGY FOR AFGHANISTAN. 
(a) PROJECTS OF TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND STABILITY 
OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Task Force for Business and Stability 
Operations in Afghanistan may carry out projects to assist 
the commander of United States Forces-Afghanistan and the 
Ambassador of the United States Mission in Afghanistan to 
reduce violence, enhance stability, and support economic nor-
malcy in Afghanistan through strategic business and economic 
activities. 
(2) DIRECTION, CONTROL, AND
CONCURRENCE.—A project 
carried out under paragraph (1) shall be subject to— 
(A) the direction and control of the Secretary of 
Defense; and 
(B) the concurrence of the Secretary of State. 
(3) SCOPE OF PROJECTS.—The projects carried out under 
paragraph (1) may include projects that facilitate private invest-
ment, industrial development, banking and financial system 
development, agricultural diversification and revitalization, and 
energy development in and with respect to Afghanistan. 
(4) FUNDING.—The Secretary may use funds available for 
overseas contingency operations for operation and maintenance 
for the Army for additional activities to carry out projects 
under paragraph (1). The amount of funds used under authority 
in the preceding sentence may not exceed $150,000,000. 
(5) PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS.—Funds pro-
vided for the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program may 
not be utilized to support or carry out projects of the Task 
Force for Business and Stability Operations. 
(6) REPORT.—Not later than October 31, 2011, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional 
committees a report describing— 
(A) the activities of the Task Force for Business and 
Stability Operations in Afghanistan in support of Operation 
Enduring Freedom during fiscal year 2011, including the 
projects carried out under paragraph (1) during that fiscal 
year; and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00972
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4427 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) how the activities of the Task Force for Business 
and Stability Operations in Afghanistan support the long- 
term stabilization of Afghanistan. 
(7) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority provided in 
paragraph (1) shall expire on September 30, 2011. 
(b) PLAN FOR TRANSITION OF TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES TO AGENCY 
FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.— 
(1) PLAN
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, the 
Administrator of the Agency for International Development, 
and the Secretary of State shall jointly develop a plan to 
transition the activities of the Task Force for Business and 
Stability Operations in Afghanistan to the Department of State. 
(2) ELEMENTS OF PLAN.—The plan shall describe at a min-
imum the following: 
(A) The activities carried out by the Task Force for 
Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan in fiscal 
year 2011. 
(B) Those activities that the Task Force for Business 
and Stability Operations in Afghanistan carried out in 
fiscal year 2011 that the Agency for International Develop-
ment will continue in fiscal year 2012, including those 
activities that, rather than explicitly continued, may be 
merged with similar efforts carried out by the Agency for 
International Development. 
(C) Any activities carried out by the Task Force for 
Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan in fiscal 
year 2011 that the Agency for International Development 
will not continue and the reasons that such activities shall 
not be continued. 
(D) Those actions that may be necessary to transition 
activities carried out by the Task Force for Business and 
Stability Operations in Afghanistan in fiscal year 2011 
and that will be continued by the Agency for International 
Development in fiscal year 2012 from the Department of 
Defense to the Agency for International Development. 
(3) REPORT REQUIRED.—At the same time that the budget 
of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) 
of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2012, the Sec-
retary of Defense shall submit the plan to the appropriate 
congressional committees. 
(c) REPORT ON ECONOMIC STRATEGY FOR AFGHANISTAN.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through 
the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, shall 
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 
on an economic strategy for Afghanistan that— 
(A) supports the United States counterinsurgency cam-
paign in Afghanistan; 
(B) promotes economic stabilization in Afghanistan, 
consistent with a longer-term development plan for 
Afghanistan; and 
(C) enhances the establishment of sustainable institu-
tions in Afghanistan. 
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report shall include the following: 
(A) An identification of the sectors within the Afghani-
stan economy that offer the greatest economic opportunities 
President. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00973
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4428 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to support the purposes of the economic strategy for 
Afghanistan set forth under paragraph (1). 
(B) An assessment of the capabilities of the Govern-
ment of Afghanistan to increase revenue generation to 
meet its own operational and developmental costs in the 
short-term, medium-term, and long-term. 
(C) An assessment of the infrastructure (water, power, 
rail, road) required to underpin economic development in 
Afghanistan. 
(D) A description of the potential role in the economic 
strategy for Afghanistan of each of the following: 
(i) Private sector investment, including investment 
by and through the Overseas Private Investment Cor-
poration. 
(ii) Efforts to promote public-private partnerships. 
(iii) National Priority Programs of the Government 
of Afghanistan, including the Afghanistan National 
Solidarity Program, and public works projects. 
(iv) International financial institutions, including 
the 
International 
Bank 
for 
Reconstruction 
and 
Development and the Asian Development Bank. 
(v) Efforts to promote trade, including efforts by 
and through the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States. 
(vi) Department of Defense policies to promote eco-
nomic stabilization and development, including the 
Afghanistan First procurement policy and efforts by 
the Department to enhance transportation, electrifica-
tion, and communications networks both within 
Afghanistan and between Afghanistan and neighboring 
countries. 
(E) An evaluation of the regional dimension of an eco-
nomic strategy for Afghanistan, including a description 
of economic areas suitable for regional collaboration and 
a prioritization among such areas for attention under the 
strategy. 
(F) A timeline and milestones for activities that can 
promote economic stabilization, development, and sustain-
ability in Afghanistan in the short-term, medium-term, 
and long-term. 
(G) Metrics for assessing progress under the economic 
strategy for Afghanistan. 
(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 
this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 
means— 
(1) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Relations, 
and Appropriations of the Senate; and 
(2) the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, 
and Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00974
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4429 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE 
XVI—IMPROVED 
SEXUAL 
AS-
SAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 
IN THE ARMED FORCES 
Sec. 1601. Definition of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and re-
sponse program and other definitions. 
Sec. 1602. Comprehensive Department of Defense policy on sexual assault preven-
tion and response program. 
Subtitle A—Organizational Structure and Application of Sexual Assault Prevention 
and Response Program Elements 
Sec. 1611. Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. 
Sec. 1612. Oversight and evaluation standards. 
Sec. 1613. Report and plan for completion of acquisition of centralized Department 
of Defense sexual assault database. 
Sec. 1614. Restricted reporting of sexual assaults. 
Subtitle B—Improved and Expanded Availability of Services 
Sec. 1621. Improved protocols for providing medical care for victims of sexual as-
sault. 
Sec. 1622. Sexual assault victims access to Victim Advocate services. 
Subtitle C—Reporting Requirements 
Sec. 1631. Annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the 
Armed Forces and improvement to sexual assault prevention and re-
sponse program. 
Sec. 1632. Additional reports. 
SEC. 1601. DEFINITION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SEXUAL 
ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PROGRAM AND 
OTHER DEFINITIONS. 
(a) SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION
AND RESPONSE PROGRAM 
DEFINED.—In this title, the term ‘‘sexual assault prevention and 
response program’’ refers to Department of Defense policies and 
programs, including policies and programs of a specific military 
department or Armed Force, that, as modified as required by this 
title— 
(1) are intended to reduce the number of sexual assaults 
involving members of the Armed Forces, whether members 
are the victim, alleged assailant, or both; and 
(2) improve the response of the Department of Defense, 
the military departments, and the Armed Forces to reports 
of sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces, 
whether members are the victim, alleged assailant, or both, 
and to reports of sexual assaults when a covered beneficiary 
under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is the victim. 
(b) OTHER DEFINITIONS.—In this title: 
(1) The term ‘‘Armed Forces’’ means the Army, Navy, Air 
Force, and Marine Corps. 
(2) The terms ‘‘covered beneficiary’’ and ‘‘dependent’’ have 
the meanings given those terms in section 1072 of title 10, 
United States Code. 
(3) The term ‘‘department’’ has the meaning given that 
term in section 101(a)(6) of title 10, United States Code. 
(4) The term ‘‘military installation’’ has the meaning given 
that term by the Secretary concerned. 
(5) The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ means— 
(A) the Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters 
concerning the Army; 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00975
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4430 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(B) the Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters 
concerning the Navy and the Marine Corps; and 
(C) the Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to 
matters concerning the Air Force. 
(6) The term ‘‘sexual assault’’ has the definition developed 
for that term by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection 
(a)(3) of section 577 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 
10 U.S.C. 113 note), subject to such modifications as the Sec-
retary considers appropriate. 
SEC. 1602. COMPREHENSIVE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY ON 
SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PRO-
GRAM. 
(a) COMPREHENSIVE POLICY REQUIRED.—Not later than March 
30, 2012, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a revised comprehensive policy for the Depart-
ment of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program 
that— 
(1) builds upon the comprehensive sexual assault preven-
tion and response policy developed under subsections (a) and 
(b) of section 577 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 
10 U.S.C. 113 note); 
(2) incorporates into the sexual assault prevention and 
response program the new requirements identified by this title; 
and 
(3) ensures that the policies and procedures of the military 
departments regarding sexual assault prevention and response 
are consistent with the revised comprehensive policy. 
(b) CONSIDERATION OF TASK FORCE FINDINGS, RECOMMENDA-
TIONS, AND PRACTICES.—In developing the comprehensive policy 
required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall take 
into account the findings and recommendations found in the report 
of the Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services 
issued in December 2009. 
(c) SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE EVALUATION 
PLAN.— 
(1) PLAN
REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
develop and implement an evaluation plan for assessing the 
effectiveness of the comprehensive policy prepared under sub-
section (a) in achieving its intended outcomes at the department 
and individual Armed Force levels. 
(2) ROLE
OF
SERVICE
SECRETARIES.—As a component of 
the evaluation plan, the Secretary of each military department 
shall assess the adequacy of measures undertaken at military 
installations and by units of the Armed Forces under the juris-
diction of the Secretary to ensure the safest and most secure 
living and working environments with regard to preventing 
sexual assault. 
(d) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 2011, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 
committees a report— 
(1) describing the process by which the comprehensive 
policy required by subsection (a) is being revised; 
Deadline. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00976
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4431 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) describing the extent to which revisions of the com-
prehensive policy and the evaluation plan required by sub-
section (c) have already been implemented; and 
(3) containing a determination by the Secretary regarding 
whether the Secretary will be able to comply with the revision 
deadline specified in subsection (a). 
(e) CONSISTENCY
OF TERMINOLOGY, POSITION DESCRIPTIONS, 
PROGRAM STANDARDS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall require 
the use of consistent terminology, position descriptions, min-
imum program standards, and organizational structures 
throughout the Armed Forces in implementing the sexual 
assault prevention and response program. 
(2) MINIMUM STANDARDS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
establish minimum standards for— 
(A) the training, qualifications, and status of Sexual 
Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim 
Advocates for the Armed Forces; and 
(B) the curricula to be used to provide sexual assault 
prevention and response training and education for mem-
bers of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the 
department to strengthen individual knowledge, skills, and 
capacity to prevent and respond to sexual assault. 
(3) RECOGNIZING OPERATIONAL DIFFERENCES.—In complying 
with this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall take into 
account the responsibilities of the Secretary concerned and 
operational needs of the Armed Force involved. 
Subtitle A—Organizational Structure and 
Application of Sexual Assault Prevention 
and Response Program Elements 
SEC. 1611. SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE OFFICE. 
(a) APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTOR.—There shall be a Director of 
the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office. During the 
development and implementation of the comprehensive policy for 
the Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response 
program, the Director shall operate under the oversight of the 
Advisory Working Group of the Deputy Secretary of Defense. 
(b) DUTIES OF DIRECTOR.—The Director of the Sexual Assault 
Prevention and Response Office shall— 
(1) oversee implementation of the comprehensive policy 
for the Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and 
response program; 
(2) serve as the single point of authority, accountability, 
and oversight for the sexual assault prevention and response 
program; and 
(3) provide oversight to ensure that the military depart-
ments comply with the sexual assault prevention and response 
program. 
(c) ROLE OF INSPECTORS GENERAL.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Inspector General of the Department 
of Defense, the Inspector General of the Army, the Naval 
Inspector General, and the Inspector General of the Air Force 
shall treat the sexual assault prevention and response program 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
Requirement. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00977
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4432 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
as an item of special interest when conducting inspections 
of organizations and activities with responsibilities regarding 
the prevention and response to sexual assault. 
(2) COMPOSITION OF INVESTIGATION TEAMS.—The Inspector 
General inspection teams shall include at least one member 
with expertise and knowledge of sexual assault prevention and 
response policies related to a specific Armed Force. 
(d) STAFF.— 
(1) ASSIGNMENT.—Not later than 18 months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, an officer from each of the Armed 
Forces in the grade of O–4 or above shall be assigned to 
the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office for a min-
imum tour length of at least 18 months. 
(2) HIGHER GRADE.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), of the 
four officers assigned to the Sexual Assault Prevention and 
Response Office under this subsection at any time, one officer 
shall be in the grade of O–6 or above. 
SEC. 1612. OVERSIGHT AND EVALUATION STANDARDS. 
(a) ISSUANCE OF STANDARDS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
issue standards to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the 
sexual assault prevention and response program of each Armed 
Force in reducing the number of sexual assaults involving members 
of the Armed Forces and in improving the response of the depart-
ment to reports of sexual assaults involving members of the Armed 
Forces, whether members of the Armed Forces are the victim, 
alleged assailant, or both. 
(b) SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION EVALUATION PLAN.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall use the sexual assault prevention and 
response evaluation plan developed under section 1602(c) to ensure 
that the Armed Forces implement and comply with assessment 
and evaluation standards issued under subsection (a). 
SEC. 1613. REPORT AND PLAN FOR COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION OF 
CENTRALIZED 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
DEFENSE 
SEXUAL 
ASSAULT DATABASE. 
(a) REPORT AND PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2011, 
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report— 
(1) describing the status of development and implementa-
tion of the centralized Department of Defense sexual assault 
database required by section 563 of the Duncan Hunter 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4470; 10 U.S.C. 113 note); 
(2) containing a revised implementation plan under sub-
section (c) of such section for completing implementation of 
the database; and 
(3) indicating the date by which the database will be oper-
ational. 
(b) CONTENT
OF IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—The plan referred 
to in subsection (a)(2) shall address acquisition best practices associ-
ated with successfully acquiring and deploying information tech-
nology systems related to the centralized sexual assault database, 
such as economically justifying the proposed system solution and 
effectively developing and managing requirements. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00978
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4433 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 1614. RESTRICTED REPORTING OF SEXUAL ASSAULTS. 
The Secretary of Defense shall clarify the limitations on the 
ability of a member of the Armed Forces to make a restricted 
report regarding the occurrence of a sexual assault and the cir-
cumstances under which information contained in a restricted 
report may no longer be confidential. 
Subtitle B—Improved and Expanded 
Availability of Services 
SEC. 1621. IMPROVED PROTOCOLS FOR PROVIDING MEDICAL CARE 
FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT. 
The Secretary of Defense shall establish comprehensive and 
consistent protocols for providing and documenting medical care 
to a member of the Armed Forces or covered beneficiary who is 
a victim of a sexual assault, including protocols with respect to 
the appropriate screening, prevention, and mitigation of diseases. 
In establishing the protocols, the Secretary shall take into consider-
ation the gender of the victim. 
SEC. 1622. SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS ACCESS TO VICTIM ADVOCATE 
SERVICES. 
(a) AVAILABILITY OF VICTIM ADVOCATE SERVICES.— 
(1) AVAILABILITY.—A member of the Armed Forces or a 
dependent, as described in paragraph (2), who is the victim 
of a sexual assault is entitled to assistance provided by a 
qualified Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 
(2) COVERED
DEPENDENTS.—The assistance described in 
paragraph (1) is available to a dependent of a member of 
the Armed Forces who is the victim of a sexual assault and 
who resides on or in the vicinity of a military installation. 
The Secretary concerned shall define the term ‘‘vicinity’’ for 
purposes of this paragraph. 
(b) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ASSISTANCE; OPT OUT.—The 
member or dependent shall be informed of the availability of assist-
ance under subsection (a) as soon as the member or dependent 
seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator. The 
victim shall also be informed that the services of a Sexual Assault 
Response Coordinator and Sexual Assault Victim Advocate are 
optional and that these services may be declined, in whole or 
in part, at any time. 
(c) NATURE
OF REPORTING IMMATERIAL.—In the case of a 
member of the Armed Forces, Victim Advocate services are available 
regardless of whether the member elects unrestricted or restricted 
(confidential) reporting of the sexual assault. 
Subtitle C—Reporting Requirements 
SEC. 
1631. 
ANNUAL 
REPORT 
REGARDING 
SEXUAL 
ASSAULTS 
INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 
IMPROVEMENT TO SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND 
RESPONSE PROGRAM. 
(a) ANNUAL REPORTS ON SEXUAL ASSAULTS.—Not later than 
March 1, 2012, and each March 1 thereafter through March 1, 
2017, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00979
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4434 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
the Secretary of Defense a report on the sexual assaults involving 
members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of that Sec-
retary during the preceding year. In the case of the Secretary 
of the Navy, separate reports shall be prepared for the Navy and 
for the Marine Corps. 
(b) CONTENTS.—The report of a Secretary of a military depart-
ment for an Armed Force under subsection (a) shall contain the 
following: 
(1) The number of sexual assaults committed against mem-
bers of the Armed Force that were reported to military officials 
during the year covered by the report, and the number of 
the cases so reported that were substantiated. 
(2) The number of sexual assaults committed by members 
of the Armed Force that were reported to military officials 
during the year covered by the report, and the number of 
the cases so reported that were substantiated. The information 
required by this paragraph may not be combined with the 
information required by paragraph (1). 
(3) A synopsis of each such substantiated case, organized 
by offense, and, for each such case, the action taken in the 
case, including the type of disciplinary or administrative sanc-
tion imposed, if any, including courts-martial sentences, non- 
judicial punishments administered by commanding officers 
pursuant to section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 
15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and administrative 
separations. 
(4) The policies, procedures, and processes implemented 
by the Secretary concerned during the year covered by the 
report in response to incidents of sexual assault involving mem-
bers of the Armed Force concerned. 
(5) The number of substantiated sexual assault cases in 
which the victim is a deployed member of the Armed Forces 
and the assailant is a foreign national, and the policies, proce-
dures, and processes implemented by the Secretary concerned 
to monitor the investigative processes and disposition of such 
cases and any actions taken to eliminate any gaps in inves-
tigating and adjudicating such cases. 
(6) A description of the implementation of the accessibility 
plan implemented pursuant to section 596(b) of such Act, 
including a description of the steps taken during that year 
to ensure that trained personnel, appropriate supplies, and 
transportation resources are accessible to deployed units in 
order to provide an appropriate and timely response in any 
case of reported sexual assault in a deployed unit, location, 
or environment. 
(c) CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIATED.—Not later than 
December 31, 2011, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a 
consistent definition of ‘‘substantiated’’ for purposes of paragraphs 
(1), (2), (3), and (5) of subsection (b) and provide synopses for 
those cases for the preparation of reports under this section. 
(d) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than April 30 of each 
year in which the Secretary of Defense receives reports under 
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall forward the reports 
to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 
of Representatives, together with— 
(1) the results of assessments conducted under the evalua-
tion plan required by section 1602(c); and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00980
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4435 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) such assessments on the reports as the Secretary of 
Defense considers appropriate. 
(e) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED REPORTING REQUIREMENT.— 
(1) REPEAL.—Subsection (f) of section 577 of the Ronald 
W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2005 (Public Law 108–375; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is repealed. 
(2) SUBMISSION OF 2010 REPORT.—The reports required by 
subsection (f) of section 577 of the Ronald W. Reagan National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 
108–375; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) covering calendar year 2010 are 
still required to be submitted to the Secretary of Defense and 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House 
of Representatives pursuant to the terms of such subsection, 
as in effect before the date of the enactment of this Act. 
SEC. 1632. ADDITIONAL REPORTS. 
(a) EXTENSION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 
SERVICES TO ADDITIONAL PERSONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
evaluate the feasibility of extending department sexual assault 
prevention and response services to Department of Defense civilian 
employees and employees of defense contractors who— 
(1) are victims of a sexual assault; and 
(2) work on or in the vicinity of a military installation 
or with members of the Armed Forces. 
(b) EXTENSION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 
PROGRAM
TO RESERVE COMPONENTS.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall evaluate the application of the sexual assault prevention and 
response program to members of the reserve components, including, 
at a minimum, the following: 
(1) The ability of members of the reserve components to 
access the services available under the sexual assault preven-
tion and response program, including policies and programs 
of a specific military department or Armed Force. 
(2) The quality of training provided to Sexual Assault 
Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates 
in the reserve components. 
(3) The degree to which the services available for regular 
and reserve members under the sexual assault prevention and 
response program are integrated. 
(4) Such recommendations as the Secretary of Defense 
considers appropriate on how to improve the services available 
for reserve members under the sexual assault prevention and 
response program and their access to the services. 
(c) COPY OF RECORD OF COURT-MARTIAL TO VICTIM OF SEXUAL 
ASSAULT.—The Secretary of Defense shall evaluate the feasibility 
of requiring that a copy of the prepared record of the proceedings 
of a general or special court-martial involving a sexual assault 
be given to the victim in cases in which the victim testified during 
the proceedings. 
(d) ACCESS TO LEGAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall evaluate the feasibility of authorizing members of the Armed 
Forces who are victims of a sexual assault and dependents of 
members who are victims of a sexual assault to receive legal assist-
ance provided by a military legal assistance counsel certified as 
competent to provide legal assistance related to responding to sexual 
assault. 
Evaluations. 
10 USC 1561 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00981
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4436 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(e) USE OF FORENSIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS.—The Secretary of 
Defense shall evaluate the feasibility of utilizing, when sexual 
assaults involving members of the Armed Forces occur in a military 
environment where civilian resources are limited or unavailable, 
forensic medical examiners who are specially trained regarding 
the collection and preservation of evidence in cases involving sexual 
assault. 
(f) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit the results of the evaluations required by this section to 
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
Representatives. 
DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 
This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011’’. 
SEC. 
2002. 
EXPIRATION 
OF 
AUTHORIZATIONS 
AND 
AMOUNTS 
REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 
(a) EXPIRATION
OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.— 
Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained 
in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX of this division for 
military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authoriza-
tions of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2013; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2014. 
(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations 
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic 
Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authoriza-
tions of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have 
been obligated before the later of— 
(1) October 1, 2013; or 
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for fiscal year 2014 for military construction projects, land 
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contribu-
tions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Invest-
ment Program. 
SEC. 2003. FUNDING TABLES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The amounts authorized to be appropriated 
by sections 2104, 2204, 2304, 2403, 2411, 2502, 2606, 2701, and 
2703 shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding 
table in section 3001. 
(b) 
OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.—The 
amounts 
authorized to be appropriated by sections 2901, 2902, and 2903 
shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding table 
in section 3002. 
Military 
Construction 
Authorization 
Act for Fiscal 
Year 2011. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00982
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4437 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2102. Family housing. 
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 
Sec. 2105. Use of unobligated Army military construction funds in conjunction with 
funds provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia to carry out certain 
fiscal year 2002 project. 
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project. 
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 
SECTION 
2101. 
AUTHORIZED 
ARMY 
CONSTRUCTION 
AND 
LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(1), 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the installations or locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Army: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Fort Rucker .............................................
$69,650,000 
Alaska .........................
Fort Greely ..............................................
$26,000,000 
Fort Richardson ......................................
$113,238,000 
Fort Wainwright .....................................
$173,000,000 
California ....................
Presidio Monterey ...................................
$140,000,000 
Colorado ......................
Fort Carson .............................................
$106,350,000 
Florida ........................
Eglin Air Force Base ..............................
$6,900,000 
Miami-Dade County ...............................
$41,000,000 
Georgia .......................
Fort Benning ...........................................
$145,400,000 
Fort Gordon .............................................
$4,150,000 
Fort Stewart ............................................
$125,250,000 
Hawaii ........................
Fort Shafter ............................................
$81,000,000 
Schofield Barracks ..................................
$212,000,000 
Tripler Army Medical Center ................
$28,000,000 
Kansas ........................
Fort Leavenworth ...................................
$7,100,000 
Fort Riley ................................................
$57,100,000 
Kentucky ....................
Fort Campbell .........................................
$143,900,000 
Fort Knox ................................................
$18,800,000 
Louisiana ....................
Fort Polk .................................................
$63,250,000 
Maryland ....................
Aberdeen Proving Ground .....................
$14,600,000 
Fort Meade ..............................................
$32,600,000 
Missouri ......................
Fort Leonard Wood .................................
$111,700,000 
New Mexico ................
White Sands ............................................
$29,000,000 
New York ....................
Fort Drum ...............................................
$228,800,000 
U.S. Military Academy ...........................
$132,324,000 
North Carolina ...........
Fort Bragg ...............................................
$310,900,000 
Oklahoma ...................
Fort Sill ...................................................
$13,800,000 
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant .....
$3,000,000 
South Carolina ...........
Fort Jackson ............................................
$91,000,000 
Texas ...........................
Fort Bliss .................................................
$149,950,000 
Fort Hood ................................................
$145,050,000 
Fort Sam Houston ..................................
$22,200,000 
Virginia .......................
Fort A.P. Hill ..........................................
$93,600,000 
Fort Eustis ..............................................
$18,000,000 
Fort Lee ...................................................
$18,400,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00983
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4438 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Army: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Washington ................
Fort Lewis ...............................................
$171,800,000 
Yakima Firing Range .............................
$3,750,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(2), 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the installations or locations 
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan .................
Bagram ...................................................
$101,500,000 
Germany ......................
Ansbach ..................................................
$31,800,000 
Grafenwoehr ..........................................
$75,500,000 
Rhine Ordnance Barracks ....................
$35,000,000 
Sembach Air Base .................................
$9,100,000 
Wiesbaden Air Base ..............................
$126,500,000 
Honduras .....................
Soto Cano Air Base ...............................
$20,400,000 
Korea ............................
Camp Walker .........................................
$19,500,000 
SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire 
family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, 
and in the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Army: Family Housing 
Country 
Installation or Loca-
tion 
Units 
Amount 
Alaska ..........................
Fort Wainwright .........
110 .................
$21,000,000 
Germany ......................
Baumholder .................
64 ...................
$34,329,000 
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural 
and engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $2,040,000. 
SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $35,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00984
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4439 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Army in the total amount of $4,565,507,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(a), $3,152,562,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2101(b), $419,300,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$23,000,000. 
(4) For host nation support and architectural and 
engineering services and construction design under section 2807 
of title 10, United States Code, $249,636,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $92,369,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United 
States Code), $518,140,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 4 of a brigade complex 
operations support facility at Vicenza, Italy, authorized by sec-
tion 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 
Stat. 505), $25,000,000. 
(7) For the construction of increment 4 of a brigade complex 
barracks and community support facility at Vicenza, Italy, 
authorized by section 2101(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public 
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 505), $26,000,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 2 of the Command 
and Battle Center at Wiesbaden, Germany, authorized by sec-
tion 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4662), $59,500,000. 
SEC. 2105. USE OF UNOBLIGATED ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
FUNDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE 
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2002 PROJECT. 
(a) FIRE STATION AT FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA.—Section 2836(d) 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 
(division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1314), as amended 
by section 2846 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2006 (division B of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 
3527) and section 2849 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 
Stat. 2486), is further amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘through a project for 
construction of an Army standard-design, two-company fire sta-
tion at Fort Belvoir, Virginia,’’ after ‘‘Building 191’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(3) The Secretary may use up to $3,900,000 of available, unobli-
gated Army military construction funds appropriated for a fiscal 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00985
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4440 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
year before fiscal year 2011, in conjunction with the funds provided 
under paragraph (1), for the project described in paragraph (2).’’. 
(b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 
shall provide information, in accordance with section 2851(c) of 
title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in 
the amendment made by subsection (a). If it becomes necessary 
to exceed the estimated project cost of $8,780,000, including 
$4,880,000 contributed by the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Sec-
retary shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such 
title regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations. 
SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 PROJECT. 
The table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 
110–417; 122 Stat. 4661) is amended by striking ‘‘Katterbach’’ and 
inserting ‘‘Grafenwoehr’’. 
SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in 
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2628) 
for Fort Riley, Kansas, for construction of a Brigade Complex at 
the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 
a 40,100 square-feet brigade headquarters consistent with the 
Army’s construction guidelines for brigade headquarters. 
SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), authorizations set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that 
Act (122 Stat. 504), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2011, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2012, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Army: Extension of 2008 Project Authorizations 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Georgia .............
Fort Stewart 
Unit Operations Facili-
ties ..............................
$16,000,000 
Hawaii ..............
Schofield Barracks 
Tactical Vehicle Wash 
Facility .......................
$10,200,000 
Barracks Complex- 
Wheeler 205 ...............
$51,000,000 
Louisiana ..........
Fort Polk 
Brigade Headquarters ..
$9,800,000 
Child Care Facility ........
$6,100,000 
Missouri ............
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Multipurpose Machine 
Gun Range .................
$4,150,000 
Oklahoma .........
Fort Sill 
Multipurpose Machine 
Gun Range .................
$3,300,000 
Washington ......
Fort Lewis 
Alternative Fuel Facil-
ity ................................
$3,300,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00986
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4441 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2202. Family housing. 
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 
Sec. 2205. Technical amendment to reflect multi-increment fiscal year 2010 project. 
Sec. 2206. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project. 
SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(1), 
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the installations or locations 
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama .....................
Mobile ......................................................
$29,082,000 
Arizona .......................
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma ..........
$285,060,000 
California ....................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton ...
$362,124,000 
Naval Base, Coronado ............................
$67,160,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar .....
$190,610,000 
San Diego ................................................
$193,706,000 
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms 
$53,158,000 
Florida ........................
Blount Island Command ........................
$74,620,000 
Georgia .......................
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay .......
$60,664,000 
Hawaii ........................
Marine Corps Base, Camp Smith ..........
$29,960,000 
Marine Corps Base, Kaneohe Bay ........
$109,660,000 
Naval Station, Pearl Harbor ..................
$108,468,000 
Maryland ....................
Naval Support Facility, Indian Head ...
$34,328,000 
Naval Air Station, Patuxent River ........
$42,211,000 
North Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune ......
$789,393,000 
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point 
$65,510,000 
Rhode Island ..............
Naval Station, Newport .........................
$27,007,000 
South Carolina ...........
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort ......
$129,410,000 
Virginia .......................
Naval Station, Norfolk ...........................
$12,435,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico ................
$143,632,000 
Washington ................
Bangor .....................................................
$56,893,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(2), 
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the installation or location 
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Navy: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Bahrain .......................
Southwest Asia ........................................
$213,153,000 
Djibouti ........................
Camp Lemonier ........................................
$11,148,000 
Guam ...........................
Naval Activities, Guam ...........................
$66,730,000 
Japan ...........................
Atsugi Naval Air Facility ........................
$6,908,000 
Spain ...........................
Naval Station, Rota .................................
$23,190,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00987
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4442 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appro-
priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire 
family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting 
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, 
and in the amounts set forth in the following table: 
Navy: Family Housing 
Location 
Installation or Location 
Units 
Amount 
Cuba ..........
Guantanamo Bay ...............................
71 
$37,169,000 
(b) PLANNING
AND
DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 
2204(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural 
and engineering services and construction design activities with 
respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units 
in an amount not to exceed $3,255,000. 
SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2204(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $146,020,000. 
SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Navy in the total amount of $4,068,963,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2201(a), $2,865,001,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2201(b), $321,129,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$20,877,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$120,050,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $186,444,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $366,346,000. 
(6) For the construction of increment 7 of a limited area 
production and storage complex at Bangor, Washington, author-
ized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108– 
375; 118 Stat. 2106), $19,116,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00988
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4443 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of a ship repair 
pier replacement at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia, author-
ized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2633), $100,000,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 2 of a wharves 
improvement at Apra Harbor, Guam, authorized by section 
2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2633), $40,000,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of a tertiary water 
treatment plant at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Cali-
fornia, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2632), $30,000,000. 
SEC. 2205. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO REFLECT MULTI-INCREMENT 
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 
Section 2204 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 
2634) is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(14) For the construction of the first increment of a tertiary 
water treatment plant at Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, 
California, authorized by section 2201(a), $112,330,000.’’; and 
(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph: 
‘‘(7) $30,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 
under section 2201(a) for North Region Tertiary Treatment 
Plant, Camp Pendleton, California).’’. 
SEC. 2206. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201(c) of 
that Act (122 Stat. 511), shall remain in effect until October 1, 
2011, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds 
for military construction for fiscal year 2012, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Navy: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
Location 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Worldwide ........
Unspecified .........
Host Nation Infrastruc-
ture ...............................
$2,700,000 
TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION 
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2302. Family housing. 
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00989
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4444 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2007 project. 
SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(1), 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the installations or 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Alabama ...........................
Maxwell Air Force Base ...............
$13,400,000 
Alaska ...............................
Eielson Air Force Base .................
$28,000,000 
...........................................
Elmendorf Air Force Base ............
$30,274,000 
Arizona .............................
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base ...
$48,500,000 
...........................................
Luke Air Force Base .....................
$64,410,000 
Colorado ...........................
Buckley Air Force Base ................
$12,160,000 
...........................................
Peterson Air Force Base ...............
$24,800,000 
...........................................
U.S. Air Force Academy ...............
$27,600,000 
Delaware ..........................
Dover Air Force Base ...................
$3,200,000 
District of Columbia ........
Bolling Air Force Base .................
$13,200,000 
Florida ..............................
Eglin Air Force Base ....................
$11,400,000 
...........................................
Hurlburt Field ...............................
$34,670,000 
...........................................
Patrick Air Force Base .................
$158,009,000 
Louisiana ..........................
Barksdale Air Force Base ............
$18,140,000 
Nevada ..............................
Creech Air Force Base ..................
$11,710,000 
...........................................
Nellis Air Force Base ...................
$51,640,000 
New Jersey .......................
McGuire Air Force Base ...............
$26,440,000 
New Mexico ......................
Cannon Air Force Base ................
$34,000,000 
...........................................
Holloman Air Force Base .............
$37,970,000 
...........................................
Kirtland Air Force Base ...............
$24,402,000 
New York .........................
Fort Drum .....................................
$20,440,000 
North Dakota ...................
Minot Air Force Base ...................
$18,770,000 
Oklahoma .........................
Tinker Air Force Base ..................
$14,000,000 
South Carolina .................
Charleston Air Force Base ...........
$15,000,000 
Texas ................................
Dyess Air Force Base ...................
$4,080,000 
...........................................
Lackland Air Force Base ..............
$127,280,000 
Utah ..................................
Hill Air Force Base .......................
$14,900,000 
Virginia .............................
Langley Air Force Base ................
$8,800,000 
Wyoming ...........................
Camp Guernsey ............................
$4,650,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(2), 
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and 
carry out military construction projects for the installations or 
locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan .............................
Bagram .......................................
$42,960,000 
Bahrain ....................................
SW Asia ......................................
$45,000,000 
Germany ..................................
Kapaun .......................................
$19,600,000 
...................................................
Ramstein Air Base ....................
$22,354,000 
...................................................
Vilseck ........................................
$12,900,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00990
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4445 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Air Force: Outside the United States—Continued 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Guam ........................................
Andersen Air Force Base ..........
$50,300,000 
Italy ..........................................
Aviano Air Base ........................
$29,200,000 
Korea ........................................
Kunsan Air Base .......................
$7,500,000 
Qutar ........................................
Al Udeid .....................................
$62,300,000 
United Kingdom ......................
RAF Mildenhall .........................
$15,000,000 
SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may carry out architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design activities with respect to the construction or improve-
ment of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,225,000. 
SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and 
using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appro-
priations in section 2304(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may 
improve existing military family housing units in an amount not 
to exceed $73,800,000. 
SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2009, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of the Air Force in the total amount of $1,885,112,000, as 
follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2301(a), $901,845,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2301(b), $307,114,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
$18,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$66,336,000. 
(5) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and 
design, and improvement of military family housing and 
facilities, $78,025,000. 
(B) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $513,792,000. 
SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2007 PROJECT. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2701 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B 
of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2463), authorization set forth 
in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2302 of that 
Act (120 Stat. 2455) and extended by section 2306 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B 
of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2638), shall remain in effect until 
October 1, 2011, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00991
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4446 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
funds for military construction for fiscal year 2012, whichever is 
later. 
(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 
Air Force: Extension of 2007 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation 
Project 
Amount 
Idaho ..............
Mountain Home 
Air Force Base ..
Replace Family Housing 
(457 units) ....................
$107,800,000 
TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects. 
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 
Sec. 2404. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 
defense-wide. 
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project. 
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 
SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(1), 
the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the installations or locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
tables: 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Arizona ..............................
Yuma Proving Ground ................
$8,977,000 
California ...........................
Point Magu Naval Base ..............
$3,100,000 
Colorado .............................
Fort Carson ..................................
$3,717,000 
District of Columbia .........
Bolling Air Force Base ................
$3,000,000 
Florida ...............................
Eglin Air Force Base ...................
$6,030,000 
Georgia ..............................
Augusta ........................................
$12,855,000 
Fort Benning ................................
$26,865,000 
Fort Stewart .................................
$35,100,000 
Hunter Air National Guard Sta-
tion ............................................
$2,400,000 
Hunter Army Airfield ..................
$3,318,000 
Hawaii ...............................
Hickam Air Force Base ...............
$8,500,000 
Pearl Harbor ................................
$28,804,000 
Idaho ..................................
Mountain Home Air Force Base
$27,500,000 
Illinois ................................
Scott Air Force Base ....................
$1,388,000 
Kentucky ...........................
Fort Campbell ..............................
$38,095,000 
Maryland ...........................
Andrews Air Force Base .............
$14,000,000 
Bethesda Naval Hospital ............
$80,000,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00992
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4447 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Fort Detrick ..................................
$45,700,000 
Fort Meade ...................................
$219,360,000 
Massachusetts ...................
Hanscom Air Force Base .............
$2,900,000 
New Mexico .......................
Cannon Air Force Base ...............
$116,225,000 
White Sands Missile Range ........
$22,900,000 
New York ...........................
United States Military Academy 
$27,960,000 
North Carolina ..................
Camp Lejeune ..............................
$16,646,000 
Fort Bragg ....................................
$168,693,000 
Ohio ...................................
Defense Supply Center, Colum-
bus.
$7,400,000 
Pennsylvania .....................
Defense Distribution Depot New 
Cumberland ..............................
$96,000,000 
Texas .................................
Lackland Air Force Base .............
$162,500,000 
Virginia ..............................
Craney Island ...............................
$58,000,000 
Fort Belvoir ..................................
$6,300,000 
Pentagon Reservation ..................
$63,324,000 
Marine Corps Base, Quantico .....
$47,355,000 
Washington .......................
Fort Lewis ....................................
$8,400,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(2), 
the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out 
military construction projects for the installations or locations out-
side the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
tables: 
Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Belgium .....................................
Brussels ....................................
$99,174,000 
Germany ....................................
Katterbach ................................
$37,100,000 
.....................................................
Panzer Kaserne ........................
$48,968,000 
.....................................................
Vilseck ......................................
$34,800,000 
Japan .........................................
Kadena Air Base ......................
$3,000,000 
.....................................................
Misawa Air Base ......................
$31,000,000 
Korea .........................................
Camp Carroll ...........................
$19,500,000 
Puerto Rico ................................
Fort Buchanan .........................
$58,708,000 
Qatar ..........................................
Al Udeid ...................................
$1,961,000 
United Kingdom .......................
Menwith Hill Station ..............
$2,000,000 
.....................................................
Royal Air Force Alconbury ......
$30,308,000 
.....................................................
Royal Air Force Mildenhall .....
$15,900,000 
SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 
(a) PROJECTS
AUTHORIZED.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(6), 
the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects 
under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the amount 
of $120,000,000. 
(b) 
AVAILABILITY
OF
FUNDS
FOR
RESERVE
COMPONENT 
PROJECTS.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by section 
2403(6) for energy conservation projects, the Secretary of Defense 
shall reserve a portion of the amount for energy conservation 
projects for the reserve components in an amount that is not less 
than an amount that bears the same proportion to the total amount 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00993
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4448 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
authorized to be appropriated as the total quantity of energy con-
sumed by reserve facilities (as defined in section 18232(2) of title 
10, United States Code) during fiscal year 2010 bears to the total 
quantity of energy consumed by all military installations (as defined 
in section 2687(e)(1) of such title) during that fiscal year, as deter-
mined by the Secretary. 
SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for military construction, land 
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Depart-
ment of Defense (other than the military departments) in the total 
amount of $3,116,137,000, as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(a), $1,373,312,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 2401(b), $382,419,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects 
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $42,856,000. 
(4) For contingency construction projects of the Secretary 
of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, 
$10,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$431,617,000. 
(6) For energy conservation projects under chapter 173 
of title 10, United States Code, $120,000,000. 
(7) For military family housing functions: 
(A) For support of military family housing (including 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $50,464,000. 
(B) For credits to the Department of Defense Family 
Housing Improvement Fund under section 2883 of title 
10, United States Code, and the Homeowners Assistance 
Fund established under section 1013 of the Demonstration 
Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 
U.S.C. 3374), $17,611,000. 
(8) For the construction of increment 5 of the Army Medical 
Research Institute of Infectious Diseases Stage I at Fort 
Detrick, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division 
B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $17,400,000. 
(9) For the construction of increment 3 of replacement 
fuel storage facilities at Point Loma Annex, California, author-
ized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110– 
181; 122 Stat. 521), as amended by section 2406 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division 
B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2646), $20,000,000. 
(10) For the construction of increment 3 of the United 
States Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense 
replacement facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public 
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4689), $105,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00994
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4449 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(11) For the construction of increment 3 of a National 
Security Agency data center at Camp Williams, Utah, author-
ized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 
123 Stat. 1888), $398,358,000. 
(12) For the construction of increment 2 of the hospital 
at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2642), $147,100,000. 
SEC. 2404. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECTS. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION OF PROJECT FOR WHICH FUNDS HAVE BEEN 
APPROPRIATED.— 
(1) AUTHORIZATION.—The table relating to the Missile 
Defense Agency in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2641) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: 
Worldwide Unspecified ....
Range Facility .........................................
$68,500,000 
(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 2404(a)(1) 
of that Act (123 Stat. 2644) is amended by striking 
‘‘$1,048,783,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,117,283,000’’. 
(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION.—In the case of the authorization 
contained in the amendment made by paragraph (1), the 
authorized project relates to an Aegis ashore test facility for 
which funds were made available by title I of the Military 
Construction and Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appro-
priations Act, 2010 (division E of Public Law 111–117; 123 
Stat. 3286) under the heading ‘‘MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION, 
DEFENSE-WIDE’’. 
(b) PURPOSE
OF FORT BRAGG PROJECT.—In the case of the 
authorization contained in the table relating to the TRICARE 
Management Activity in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 
111–84; 123 Stat. 2642) for Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for construc-
tion of a Health Clinic at the installation, the Secretary of Defense 
may construct a Behavioral Health clinic that predominantly pro-
vides behavioral health specialty care. 
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization 
Authorizations 
SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILI-
TARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for military construction and 
land acquisition for chemical demilitarization in the total amount 
of $124,971,000, as follows: 
(1) For the construction of phase 12 of a chemical munitions 
demilitarization facility at Pueblo Chemical Activity, Colorado, 
authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00995
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4450 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public 
Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 2406 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), section 
2407 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), 
and section 2413 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 
122 Stat. 4697), $65,569,000. 
(2) For the construction of phase 11 of a munitions demili-
tarization facility at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, author-
ized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 
65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division 
B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of 
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), and 
section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of this Act, $59,402,000. 
SEC. 2412. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT. 
(a) MODIFICATION.—The table in section 2401(a) of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B 
of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 
(division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 
(division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), and section 
2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), is 
amended— 
(1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot, Ken-
tucky, by striking ‘‘$492,000,000’’ in the amount column and 
inserting ‘‘$746,000,000’’; and 
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the 
amount column and inserting ‘‘$1,203,920,000’’. 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2405(b)(3) of the Mili-
tary Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division 
B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), as amended by section 
2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 
2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), and 
section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 
4697), is further amended by striking ‘‘$469,200,000’’ and inserting 
‘‘$723,200,000’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00996
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4451 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 
ORGANIZATION 
SECURITY 
INVEST-
MENT PROGRAM 
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 
SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as pro-
vided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 
not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 
for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from 
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction 
previously financed by the United States. 
SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States 
Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects 
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 
Program authorized by section 2501, in the amount of $258,884,000. 
TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE 
FORCES FACILITIES 
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 
land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 
projects. 
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 
Sec. 2607. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects. 
SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1), 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army National Guard 
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Arizona ....................
Florence .......................................................
$16,500,000 
Arkansas .................
Camp Robinson ..........................................
$30,000,000 
Fort Chaffee ................................................
$21,500,000 
California ................
Camp Roberts .............................................
$19,000,000 
Colorado ..................
Colorado Springs ........................................
$20,000,000 
Fort Carson .................................................
$40,000,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00997
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4452 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Army National Guard: Inside the United States—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Gypsum .......................................................
$39,000,000 
Windsor .......................................................
$7,500,000 
Connecticut .............
Windsor Locks ............................................
$41,000,000 
Delaware .................
New Castle ..................................................
$27,000,000 
Georgia ....................
Cumming ....................................................
$17,000,000 
Dobbins Air Reserve Base .........................
$10,400,000 
Hawaii .....................
Kalaeloa ......................................................
$38,000,000 
Idaho .......................
Gowen Field ................................................
$17,500,000 
Mountain Home ..........................................
$6,300,000 
Illinois .....................
Springfield ..................................................
$15,000,000 
Kansas ....................
Wichita ........................................................
$67,000,000 
Kentucky .................
Burlington ...................................................
$19,500,000 
Louisiana ................
Fort Polk .....................................................
$5,500,000 
Minden ........................................................
$28,000,000 
Maryland ................
St. Inigoes ...................................................
$5,500,000 
Massachusetts ........
Hanscom Air Force Base ...........................
$23,000,000 
Michigan .................
Camp Grayling Range ...............................
$19,000,000 
Minnesota ...............
Arden Hills .................................................
$29,000,000 
Camp Ripley ...............................................
$8,750,000 
Nebraska .................
Lincoln ........................................................
$3,300,000 
Mead ............................................................
$11,400,000 
New Hampshire .....
Pembroke ....................................................
$36,000,000 
New Mexico ............
Farmington .................................................
$8,500,000 
North Carolina .......
High Point ...................................................
$1,551,000 
North Dakota .........
Camp Grafton .............................................
$11,200,000 
Rhode Island ...........
East Greenwich ..........................................
$27,000,000 
South Dakota ..........
Watertown ..................................................
$25,000,000 
Texas .......................
Camp Maxey ...............................................
$2,500,000 
Camp Swift .................................................
$2,600,000 
Washington .............
Tacoma ........................................................
$25,000,000 
West Virginia .........
Moorefield ...................................................
$14,200,000 
Morgantown ................................................
$21,000,000 
Wisconsin ................
Madison .......................................................
$5,700,000 
Wyoming .................
Laramie .......................................................
$14,400,000 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1), 
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry 
out military construction projects for the Army National Guard 
locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth 
in the following table: 
Army National Guard: Outside the United States 
Country 
Location 
Amount 
Guam .............................
Barrigada ..............................................
$19,000,000 
Virgin Islands ...............
St. Croix ................................................
$25,000,000 
Puerto Rico ...................
Camp Santiago .....................................
$12,300,000 
SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606(2), the Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in 
the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00998
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4453 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Army Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California ......................
Fairfield ................................................
$26,000,000 
Fort Hunter Liggett .............................
$52,000,000 
Florida ...........................
North Fort Myers .................................
$13,800,000 
Orlando .................................................
$10,200,000 
Tallahasee .............................................
$10,400,000 
Georgia ..........................
Macon ....................................................
$11,400,000 
Illinois ...........................
Quincy ...................................................
$12,200,000 
Indiana ..........................
Michigan City .......................................
$15,500,000 
Iowa ...............................
Des Moines ...........................................
$8,175,000 
Massachusetts ..............
Devens Reserve Forces Training Area 
$4,700,000 
Missouri ........................
Belton ....................................................
$11,800,000 
New Mexico ..................
Las Cruces ............................................
$11,400,000 
New York ......................
Binghamton ..........................................
$13,400,000 
Texas .............................
Denton ...................................................
$12,600,000 
Rio Grande ............................................
$6,100,000 
San Marcos ...........................................
$8,500,000 
Virginia .........................
Fort A.P. Hill ........................................
$15,500,000 
Fort Story .............................................
$11,000,000 
Roanoke ................................................
$14,800,000 
Wisconsin ......................
Fort McCoy ...........................................
$19,800,000 
SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606(3), the Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction projects 
for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside 
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following 
table: 
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
California .......................
Marine 
Corps 
Base, 
Twentynine 
Palms ................................................
$5,991,000 
Louisiana .......................
New Orleans ........................................
$16,281,000 
Virginia ..........................
Williamsburg .......................................
$21,346,000 
Washington ....................
Yakima .................................................
$13,844,000 
SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606(4), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United 
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air National Guard 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Alabama ........................
Montgomery Regional Airport (ANG)
$7,472,000 
Arizona ..........................
Davis Monthan Air Force Base ...........
$4,650,000 
Fort Huachuca ......................................
$11,000,000 
Delaware .......................
New Castle County Airport .................
$1,500,000 
Florida ...........................
Jacksonville International Airport .....
$6,700,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 00999
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4454 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Air National Guard—Continued 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Georgia ..........................
Savannah/Hilton Head International 
Airport ...............................................
$7,450,000 
Hawaii ...........................
Hickam Air Force Base ........................
$71,450,000 
Illinois ...........................
Capital Municipal Airport ...................
$16,700,000 
Indiana ..........................
Hulman Regional Airport ....................
$4,100,000 
Maryland .......................
Martin State Airport ............................
$11,400,000 
New York ......................
Fort Drum .............................................
$2,500,000 
Stewart International Airport .............
$14,250,000 
North Carolina .............
Stanly County Airport .........................
$2,000,000 
Pennsylvania ................
State College Air National Guard Sta-
tion .....................................................
$4,100,000 
Tennessee ......................
Nashville International Airport ..........
$5,500,000 
Texas .............................
Ellington Field ......................................
$7,000,000 
SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2606(5), the Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Air Force Reserve location inside the United States, 
and in the amount, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force Reserve 
State 
Location 
Amount 
Florida ............................
Patrick Air Force Base .......................
$3,420,000 
SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 
AND RESERVE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for the costs of acquisition, 
architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities 
for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, 
under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the 
cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), in the following 
amounts: 
(1) For the Department of the Army, for the Army National 
Guard of the United States, $873,664,000. 
(2) For the Department of the Army, for the Army Reserve, 
$318,175,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Navy, for the Navy and 
Marine Corps Reserve, $61,557,000. 
(4) For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air 
National Guard of the United States, $194,986,000. 
(5) For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air Force 
Reserve, $7,832,000. 
SEC. 2607. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
2008 PROJECTS. 
(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B 
of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth 
in the tables in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01000
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4455 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
2604 of that Act, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2011, 
or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military 
construction for fiscal year 2012, whichever is later. 
(b) TABLE.—The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as 
follows: 
Army National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Pennsylvania 
East Fallowfield 
Township ........
Readiness Center (SBCT) .........
$ 8,300,000 
Air National Guard: Extension of 2008 Project Authorization 
State 
Installation or 
Location 
Project 
Amount 
Vermont ...........
Burlington .........
Base Security Improvements
$ 6,600,000 
TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND 
CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990. 
Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through De-
partment of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activi-
ties funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005. 
Sec. 2704. Transportation plan for BRAC 133 project under Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
BRAC initiative. 
SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 
1990. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for base realignment and clo-
sure activities, including real property acquisition and military 
construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 
of such Act, in the total amount of $360,474,000, as follows: 
(1) For the Department of the Army, $73,600,000. 
(2) For the Department of the Navy, $162,000,000. 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force, $124,874,000. 
SEC. 2702. AUTHORIZED BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVI-
TIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE 
CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of 
appropriations in section 2703, the Secretary of Defense may carry 
out base realignment and closure activities, including real property 
acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by 
the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A 
of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01001
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4456 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 
2005 established by section 2906A of such Act, in the amount 
of $2,354,285,000. 
SEC. 2703. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGN-
MENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 
2005. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, for base realignment and clo-
sure activities, including real property acquisition and military 
construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 
101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department 
of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A 
of such Act, in the total amount of $2,354,285,000. 
SEC. 2704. TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR BRAC 133 PROJECT UNDER 
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA, BRAC INITIATIVE. 
(a) SUBMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN.—Not later than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a transportation plan for the BRAC 133 project. 
(b) TRANSPORTATION PLAN CONDITIONS.—The transportation 
plan for the BRAC 133 project must address ingress and egress 
of all personnel to and from the BRAC 133 project site. The 
transportation plan shall also assess the costs and programming 
of short-, medium-, and long-term projects, and the use of other 
methods of transportation, that are necessary to maintain existing 
level of service, and the proposed funding source to obtain such 
levels of service, at the following six intersections 
(1) The intersection of Beauregard Street and Mark Center 
Drive. 
(2) The intersection of Beauregard Street and Seminary 
Road. 
(3) The intersection of Seminary Road and Mark Center 
Drive. 
(4) The intersection of Seminary Road and the northbound 
entrance-ramp to I–395. 
(5) The intersection of Seminary Road and the northbound 
exit-ramp from I–395. 
(6) The intersection of Seminary Road and the southbound 
exit-ramp from I–395. 
(c) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than September 
15, 2011, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evalu-
ating the sufficiency and coordination conducted in completing the 
requisite environmental studies associated with the site selection 
of the BRAC 133 project pursuant to the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Inspector General 
shall give specific attention to the transportation determinations 
associated with the BRAC 133 project and review and provide 
comment on the transportation plan for the BRAC 133 project 
and the plan’s adherence to the conditions imposed by subsection 
(b). 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘BRAC 133 project’’ refers to the proposed 
office complex to be developed at an established mixed-use 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01002
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4457 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
business park in Alexandria, Virginia, to implement rec-
ommendation 133 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
Commission contained in the report of the Commission trans-
mitted to Congress on September 15, 2005, under section 
2903(e) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 
2687 note). 
(2) The term ‘‘level of service’’ has the meaning given 
that term in the most-recent Highway Capacity Manual of 
the Transportation Research Board. 
TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 
Sec. 2801. Availability of military construction information on Internet. 
Sec. 2802. Use of Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for construc-
tion or alteration at Pentagon Reservation. 
Sec. 2803. Reduced reporting time limits for certain military construction and real 
property reports when submitted in electronic media. 
Sec. 2804. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction 
projects inside the United States Central Command area of responsi-
bility. 
Sec. 2805. Sense of Congress and report regarding employment of veterans to work 
on military construction projects. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 
Sec. 2811. Notice-and-wait requirements applicable to real property transactions. 
Sec. 2812. Treatment of proceeds generated from leases of non-excess property in-
volving military museums. 
Sec. 2813. Limitation on enhanced use leases of non-excess property. 
Sec. 2814. Repeal of expired authority to lease land for special operations activities. 
Sec. 2815. Former Naval Bombardment Area, Culebra Island, Puerto Rico. 
Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Guam Realignment 
Sec. 2821. Extension of term of Deputy Secretary of Defense’s leadership of Guam 
Oversight Council. 
Sec. 2822. Utility conveyances to support integrated water and wastewater treat-
ment system on Guam. 
Sec. 2823. Report on types of facilities required to support Guam realignment. 
Sec. 2824. Report on civilian infrastructure needs for Guam. 
Subtitle D—Energy Security 
Sec. 2831. Consideration of environmentally sustainable practices in Department 
energy performance plan. 
Sec. 2832. Enhancement of energy security activities of the Department of Defense. 
Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 
Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Whittier, Alaska. 
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, Fort Knox, Kentucky. 
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Naval Support Activity (West Bank), New Orleans, 
Louisiana. 
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, former Navy Extremely Low Frequency communica-
tions project site, Republic, Michigan. 
Sec. 2845. Land conveyance, Marine Forces Reserve Center, Wilmington, North 
Carolina. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
Sec. 2851. Limitation on availability of funds pending report regarding construction 
of a new outlying landing field in North Carolina and Virginia. 
Sec. 2852. Requirements related to providing world class military medical centers. 
Sec. 2853. Report on fuel infrastructure sustainment, restoration, and moderniza-
tion requirements. 
Sec. 2854. Naming of Armed Forces Reserve Center, Middletown, Connecticut. 
Sec. 2855. Sense of Congress on proposed extension of the Alaska Railroad corridor 
across Federal land in Alaska. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01003
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4458 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 2856. Sense of Congress on improving military housing for members of the Air 
Force. 
Sec. 2857. Sense of Congress regarding recreational hunting and fishing on mili-
tary installations. 
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program 
and Military Family Housing Changes 
SEC. 2801. AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 
ON INTERNET. 
(a) MODIFICATION
OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
TO BE PRO-
VIDED.—Paragraph (2) of subsection (c) of section 2851 of title 
10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking subparagraph (F); and 
(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (G) and (H) as subpara-
graphs (F) and (G), respectively. 
(b) EXPANDED AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—Such subsection 
is further amended— 
(1) by striking paragraph (3); and 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3). 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such subsection is further 
amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘that, when activated 
by a person authorized under paragraph (3), will permit the 
person’’ and inserting ‘‘that will permit a person’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)— 
(A) by striking ‘‘to the persons referred to in paragraph 
(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘on the Internet site required by such 
paragraph’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘to such persons’’. 
SEC. 
2802. 
USE 
OF 
PENTAGON 
RESERVATION 
MAINTENANCE 
REVOLVING FUND FOR CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 
AT PENTAGON RESERVATION. 
Section 2674(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Monies’’ and inserting 
‘‘Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), monies’’; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 
‘‘(3) If the cost of a construction or alteration activity proposed 
to be financed in whole or in part using monies from the Fund 
will exceed the limitation specified in section 2805 of this title 
for a comparable unspecified minor military construction project, 
the activity shall be subject to authorization as provided by section 
2802 of this title before monies from the Fund are obligated for 
the activity. 
‘‘(4) The authority of the Secretary to use monies from the 
Fund to support construction or alteration activities at the Pentagon 
Reservation expires on September 30, 2012.’’. 
SEC. 2803. REDUCED REPORTING TIME LIMITS FOR CERTAIN MILITARY 
CONSTRUCTION AND REAL PROPERTY REPORTS WHEN 
SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE CON-
SERVATION.—Section 2694a(e) of title 10 United States Code, is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
‘‘or, if earlier, a period of 14 days has elapsed from the date 
Expiration date. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01004
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4459 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic 
medium pursuant to section 480 of this title’’. 
(b) NATO SECURITY
INVESTMENT
CONTRIBUTIONS.—Section 
2806(c)(2)(B) of such title is amended by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ‘‘or, if earlier, a period of 14 days has 
elapsed from the date on which a copy of the report is provided 
in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title’’. 
(c) FORD ISLAND DEVELOPMENT.—Section 2814(g)(2) of such 
title is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ‘‘or, if earlier, a period of 20 days has elapsed from 
the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an 
electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title’’. 
(d) LEASING OF MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING.—Section 2828(f)(2) 
of such title is amended by inserting before the period at the 
end the following: ‘‘or, if earlier, a period of 14 days has elapsed 
from the date on which a copy of the notification is provided 
in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title’’. 
(e) LEASING
OF
MILITARY
FAMILY
HOUSING
TO
BE
CON-
STRUCTED.—Section 2835(g)(2) of such title is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘calendar’’; and 
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
‘‘or, if earlier, a period of 14 days has elapsed from the date 
on which a copy of the analysis is provided in an electronic 
medium pursuant to section 480 of this title’’. 
(f) ACQUISITION
OR CONSTRUCTION
OF MILITARY UNACCOM-
PANIED HOUSING.—Section 2881a(e)(2) of such title is amended 
by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘or, if 
earlier, a period of 20 days has elapsed from the date on which 
a copy of the report is provided in an electronic medium pursuant 
to section 480 of this title’’. 
(g) 
USE
OF
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
ALTERNATIVE 
AUTHORITY.—Section 2884(a)(4) of such title is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘or, if earlier, 
a period of 20 days has elapsed from the date on which a copy 
of the report is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to 
section 480 of this title’’. 
SEC. 2804. AUTHORITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDS 
FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INSIDE THE UNITED 
STATES CENTRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. 
(a) INCLUSION OF AREA FORMERLY WITHIN UNITED STATES CEN-
TRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY.—Subsection (a) of section 
2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as amended 
by subsections (a) and (b) of section 2806 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public 
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2662), is amended by striking ‘‘United States 
Central Command area of responsibility’’ and inserting ‘‘area of 
responsibility of the United States Central Command or the area 
of responsibility and area of interest of Combined Task Force- 
Horn of Africa’’. 
(b) ANNUAL LIMITATION ON USE OF AUTHORITY IN AFGHANI-
STAN.—Subsection (c)(2) of section 2808 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 
108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as amended by section 2806(c) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (divi-
sion B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2663), is amended— 
10 USC 2806. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01005
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4460 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) by striking ‘‘$300,000,000 in funds available for oper-
ation and maintenance for fiscal year 2010 may be used in 
Afghanistan upon completing the prenotification requirements 
under subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000,000 in funds 
available for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2011 
may be used in Afghanistan subject to the notification require-
ments under subsection (b)’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘$500,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$300,000,000’’. 
(c) ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (h) of sec-
tion 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), 
as added by section 2806(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 
123 Stat. 2662), is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2011’’; and 
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2011’’ and 
inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012’’. 
(d) DEFINITION.—Section 2808 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 
108–136; 117 Stat. 1723) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection: 
‘‘(i) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘area of responsibility’, with respect to the 
Combined Task Force-Horn of Africa, is Kenya, Somalia, Ethi-
opia, Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti, and Seychelles. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘area of interest’, with respect to the Com-
bined Task Force-Horn of Africa, is Yemen, Tanzania, Mauri-
tius, Madagascar, Mozambique, Burundi, Rwanda, Comoros, 
Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Uganda.’’. 
SEC. 2805. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT REGARDING EMPLOY-
MENT OF VETERANS TO WORK ON MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Secretary of Defense should establish a Veterans to Work pro-
gram to provide an opportunity for apprentices, who are also vet-
erans, to work on military construction projects. 
(b) REPORT.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after enact-
ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees a report that includes 
at a minimum the following: 
(A) An assessment of the number of unemployed 
apprentices, who are also veterans, with data presented 
by appropriate age groupings. 
(B) An evaluation of benefits to be derived from estab-
lishing a program to employ apprentices, who are also 
veterans, in military construction projects, including the 
impacts of the program on the following: 
(i) Workforce sustainability. 
(ii) Workforce skills enhancement. 
(iii) Short- and long-term cost-effectiveness. 
(iv) Improved veteran employment in sustainable 
wage fields. 
(C) Any challenges, difficulties, or problems projected 
in recruiting apprentices, who are also veterans. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01006
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4461 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare 
the report in consultation with the Secretary of Labor and 
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘apprentice’’ means an individual who is 
employed pursuant to, and individually registered in, a quali-
fied apprenticeship program. 
(2) The term ‘‘qualified apprenticeship program’’ means 
an apprenticeship or other training program that qualifies as 
an employee welfare benefit plan, as defined in section 3(1) 
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 
U.S.C. 1002(1)). 
(3) The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the meaning given such term 
in section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code. 
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities 
Administration 
SEC. 2811. NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO REAL 
PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS. 
(a) EXCEPTION FOR LEASES UNDER BASE CLOSURE PROCESS.— 
Subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 2662 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting after ‘‘United States’’ the following: ‘‘(other 
than a lease or license entered into under section 2667(g) of this 
title)’’. 
(b) REPEAL OF ANNUAL REPORT ON MINOR REAL ESTATE TRANS-
ACTIONS.—Subsection (b) of such section is repealed. 
(c) GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF REQUIREMENTS.—Subsection (c) of 
such section is amended— 
(1) by striking ‘‘GEOGRAPHIC
SCOPE; EXCEPTED’’ and 
inserting ‘‘EXCEPTED’’; 
(2) by striking the first sentence; and 
(3) by striking ‘‘It does not’’ and inserting ‘‘This section 
does not’’. 
(d) REPEAL OF NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT REGARDING 
GSA LEASES OF SPACE FOR DOD.—Subsection (e) of such section 
is repealed. 
(e) ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING LEASES 
OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES.—Such section 
is further amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following 
new subsection: 
‘‘(b) ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING LEASES 
OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES.—(1) In the 
case of a proposed lease or license of real property owned by 
the United States covered by paragraph (1)(C) of subsection (a), 
the Secretary concerned shall comply with the notice-and-wait 
requirements of paragraph (3) of such subsection before— 
‘‘(A) issuing a contract solicitation or other lease offering 
with regard to the transaction; and 
‘‘(B) providing public notice regarding any meeting to dis-
cuss a proposed contract solicitation with regard to the trans-
action. 
‘‘(2) The report under paragraph (3) of subsection (a) shall 
include the following with regard to a proposed transaction covered 
by paragraph (1)(C) of such subsection: 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01007
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4462 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(A) A description of the proposed transaction, including 
the proposed duration of the lease or license. 
‘‘(B) A description of the authorities to be used in entering 
into the transaction. 
‘‘(C) A statement of the scored cost of the entire transaction, 
determined using the scoring criteria of the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget. 
‘‘(D) A determination that the property involved in the 
transaction is not excess property, as required by section 
2667(a)(3) of this title, including the basis for the determination. 
‘‘(E) A determination that the proposed transaction is 
directly compatible with the mission of the military installation 
or Defense Agency at which the property is located and a 
description of the anticipated long-term use of the property 
at the conclusion of the lease or license. 
‘‘(F) A description of the requirements or conditions within 
the contract solicitation or other lease offering for the person 
making the offer to address taxation issues, including pay-
ments-in-lieu-of taxes, and other development issues related 
to local municipalities. 
‘‘(G) If the proposed lease involves a project related to 
energy production, a certification by the Secretary of Defense 
that the project, as it will be specified in the contract solicitation 
or other lease offering, is consistent with the Department of 
Defense performance goals and plan required by section 2911 
of this title. 
‘‘(3) The Secretary concerned may not enter into the actual 
lease or license with respect to property for which the information 
required by paragraph (2) was submitted in a report under sub-
section (a)(3) unless the Secretary again complies with the notice- 
and-wait requirements of such subsection. The subsequent report 
shall include the following with regard to the proposed transaction: 
‘‘(A) A cross reference to the prior report that contained 
the information submitted under paragraph (2) with respect 
to the transaction. 
‘‘(B) A description of the differences between the informa-
tion submitted under paragraph (2) and the information 
regarding the transaction being submitted in the subsequent 
report. 
‘‘(C) A description of the payment to be required in connec-
tion with the lease or license, including a description of any 
in-kind consideration that will be accepted. 
‘‘(D) A description of any community support facility or 
provision of community support services under the lease or 
license, regardless of whether the facility will be operated by 
a covered entity (as defined in section 2667(d) of this title) 
or the lessee or the services will be provided by a covered 
entity or the lessee. 
‘‘(E) A description of the competitive procedures used to 
select the lessee or, in the case of a lease involving the public 
benefit exception authorized by section 2667(h)(2) of this title, 
a description of the public benefit to be served by the lease.’’. 
(f) 
CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Such 
section 
is 
further 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a)— 
10 USC 2662. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01008
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4463 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the Secretary sub-
mits’’ in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and 
inserting ‘‘the Secretary concerned submits’’; and 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘the Secretary of 
a military department or the Secretary of Defense’’ and 
inserting ‘‘the Secretary concerned’’; 
(2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
(e) and (f), respectively; 
(3) in subsection (f), as so redesignated— 
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘, and the reporting 
requirement set forth in subsection (e) shall not apply 
with respect to a real property transaction otherwise cov-
ered by that subsection,’’; 
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘or (e), as the case 
may be’’; and 
(C) by striking paragraph (4); and 
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 
‘‘(g) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this section, the term 
‘Secretary concerned’ includes, with respect to Defense Agencies, 
the Secretary of Defense.’’. 
(g) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO LEASE OF NON-EXCESS PROP-
ERTY AUTHORITY.—Section 2667 of such title is amended— 
(1) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (4); 
(2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (6); 
(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking subparagraph (E); and 
(4) in subsection (h)— 
(A) by striking paragraphs (3) and (5); and 
(B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3). 
SEC. 2812. TREATMENT OF PROCEEDS GENERATED FROM LEASES OF 
NON-EXCESS PROPERTY INVOLVING MILITARY MUSEUMS. 
Section 2667(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
by section 2811(g), is amended by inserting after subparagraph 
(D) the following new subparagraph (E): 
‘‘(E) If the proceeds deposited in the special account established 
for the Secretary concerned are derived from activities associated 
with a military museum described in section 489(a) of this title, 
the proceeds shall be available for activities described in subpara-
graph (C) only at that museum.’’. 
SEC. 2813. LIMITATION ON ENHANCED USE LEASES OF NON-EXCESS 
PROPERTY. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2667(b)(7) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 
‘‘, or otherwise commit the Secretary concerned or the Department 
of Defense to annual payments in excess of such amount.’’. 
(b) ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME.—Section 1511(i)(2) of 
the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 411(i)(2)) 
is amended— 
(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting 
a semicolon; 
(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the 
end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
‘‘(F) may not provide for a leaseback by the Retirement 
Home with an annual payment in excess of $100,000, or other-
wise commit the Retirement Home or the Department of 
Defense to annual payments in excess of such amount.’’. 
10 USC 2667. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01009
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4464 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 2814. REPEAL OF EXPIRED AUTHORITY TO LEASE LAND FOR SPE-
CIAL OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES. 
(a) REPEAL.—Section 2680 of title 10, United States Code, is 
repealed. 
(b) EFFECT OF REPEAL.—The amendment made by subsection 
(a) shall not affect the validity of any contract entered into under 
section 2680 of title 10, United States Code, on or before September 
30, 2005. 
(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by striking the item 
relating to section 2680. 
SEC. 2815. FORMER NAVAL BOMBARDMENT AREA, CULEBRA ISLAND, 
PUERTO RICO. 
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—At the request of the Commonwealth 
of Puerto Rico, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study 
relating to the presence of unexploded ordnance in a portion of 
the former bombardment area at Culebra Island, Puerto Rico, trans-
ferred to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico by quitclaim deed. 
The Secretary shall complete the study within 270 days after 
receiving the request from the Commonwealth. 
(b) CONTENTS OF STUDY.—The study shall include a specific 
assessment of Flamenco Beach located within the former bombard-
ment area and shall include the following elements for each area: 
(1) An estimate of the type and amount of unexploded 
ordnance. 
(2) An estimate of the cost of removing unexploded ord-
nance. 
(3) An examination of the impact of such removal on any 
endangered or threatened species and their habitat. 
(4) An examination of current public access to the former 
bombardment area. 
(5) An examination of any threats to public health or safety 
and the environment from unexploded ordnance. 
(c) CONSULTATION WITH COMMONWEALTH.—In conducting the 
study, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Common-
wealth of Puerto Rico regarding the Commonwealth’s planned 
future uses of the former bombardment area. The Secretary shall 
consider the Commonwealth’s planned future uses in developing 
any conclusions or recommendations the Secretary may include 
in the study. 
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘quitclaim deed’’ refers to the quitclaim deed 
from the United States to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 
signed by the Secretary of the Interior on August 11, 1982, 
for that portion of Tract (1b) consisting of the former bombard-
ment area on the island of Culebra, Puerto Rico. 
(2) The term ‘‘unexploded ordnance’’ has the meaning given 
that term by section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code. 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2680 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01010
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4465 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Guam 
Realignment 
SEC. 2821. EXTENSION OF TERM OF DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE’S 
LEADERSHIP OF GUAM OVERSIGHT COUNCIL. 
Subsection (d) of section 132 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by section 2831(a) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 
123 Stat. 2669), is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2015’’ 
and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 
SEC. 2822. UTILITY CONVEYANCES TO SUPPORT INTEGRATED WATER 
AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ON GUAM. 
(a) CONVEYANCE OF UTILITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may 
convey to the Guam Waterworks Authority (in this section referred 
to as the ‘‘Authority’’) all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the water and wastewater treatment utility systems 
on Guam, including the Fena Reservoir, for the purpose of estab-
lishing an integrated water and wastewater treatment system on 
Guam. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) CONSIDERATION
REQUIRED.—As consideration for the 
conveyance of the water and wastewater treatment utility sys-
tems on Guam, the Authority shall pay to the Secretary of 
Defense an amount equal to the fair market value of the 
utility infrastructure to be conveyed, as determined pursuant 
to an agreement between the Secretary and the Authority. 
(2) DEFERRED
PAYMENTS.—At the discretion of the 
Authority, the Authority may elect to pay the consideration 
determined under paragraph (1) in equal annual payments 
over a period of not more than 25 years, starting with the 
first year beginning after the date of the conveyance of the 
water and wastewater treatment utility systems to the 
Authority. 
(3) ACCEPTANCE OF IN-KIND SERVICES.—The consideration 
required by paragraph (1) may be paid in cash or in-kind, 
as acceptable to the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of 
Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, 
shall consider the value of in-kind services provided by the 
Government of Guam pursuant to section 311 of the Compact 
of Free Association between the Government of the United 
States and the Government of the Federated States of Micro-
nesia, approved by Congress in the Compact of Free Association 
Amendments Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–188; 117 Stat. 2781), 
section 311 of the Compact of Free Association between the 
Government of the United States and the Government of the 
Republic of the Marshall Islands, approved by Congress in 
such Act, and the Compact of Free Association between the 
Government of the United States and the Government of the 
Republic of Palau, approved by Congress in the Palau Compact 
of Free Association Act (Public Law 99–658; 100 Stat. 3672). 
(c) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—As a condition of the convey-
ance under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense must obtain 
at least a 33 percent voting representation on the Guam Consoli-
dated Commission on Utilities, including a proportional representa-
tion as chairperson of the Commission. 
Time period. 
Payments. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01011
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4466 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(d) IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.— 
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—If the Secretary of Defense deter-
mines to use the authority provided by subsection (a) to convey 
the water and wastewater treatment utility systems to the 
Authority, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 
defense committees a report containing— 
(A) a description of the actions needed to efficiently 
convey the water and wastewater treatment utility systems 
to the Authority; and 
(B) an estimate of the cost of the conveyance. 
(2) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit the report 
not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary 
makes the determination triggering the report requirement. 
(e) NEW WATER SYSTEMS.—If the Secretary of Defense deter-
mines to use the authority provided by subsection (a) to convey 
the water and wastewater treatment utility systems to the 
Authority, the Secretary shall also enter into an agreement with 
the Authority, under which the Authority will manage and operate 
any water well or wastewater treatment plant that is constructed 
by the Secretary of a military department on Guam on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act. 
(f) ADDITIONAL
TERM
AND
CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of 
Defense may require such additional terms and conditions in 
connection with the conveyance under this section as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
(g) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.— 
(1) ASSISTANCE
AUTHORIZED; REIMBURSEMENT.—The Sec-
retary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of 
the Bureau of Reclamation, may provide technical assistance 
to the Secretary of Defense and the Authority regarding the 
development of plans for the design, construction, operation, 
and maintenance of integrated water and wastewater treatment 
utility systems on Guam. 
(2) CONTRACTING AUTHORITY; CONDITION.—The Secretary 
of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau 
of Reclamation, may enter into memoranda of understanding, 
cooperative agreements, and other agreements with the Sec-
retary of Defense to provide technical assistance as described 
in paragraph (1) under such terms and conditions as the Sec-
retary of the Interior and the Secretary of Defense consider 
appropriate, except that costs incurred by the Secretary of 
the Interior to provide technical assistance under paragraph 
(1) shall be covered by the Secretary of Defense. 
(3) REPORT AND OTHER ASSISTANCE.—Not later than one 
year after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of the Interior and the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Nat-
ural Resources of the House of Representatives, and the Com-
mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report 
detailing the following: 
(A) Any technical assistance provided under paragraph 
(1) and information pertaining to any memoranda of under-
standing, cooperative agreements, and other agreements 
entered into pursuant to paragraph (2). 
(B) An assessment of water and wastewater systems 
on Guam, including cost estimates and budget authority, 
including authorities available under the Acts of June 17, 
Contracts. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01012
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4467 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
1902, and June 12, 1906 (popularly known as the Reclama-
tion Act; 43 U.S.C. 391) and other authority available to 
the Secretary of the Interior, for financing the design, 
construction, operation, and maintenance of such systems. 
(C) The needs related to water and wastewater infra-
structure on Guam and the protection of water resources 
on Guam identified by the Authority. 
SEC. 2823. REPORT ON TYPES OF FACILITIES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT 
GUAM REALIGNMENT. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the structural 
integrity of facilities required to support the realignment of military 
installations and the relocation of military personnel on Guam. 
(b) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection 
(a) shall contain the following elements: 
(1) A threat assessment to the realigned forces, including 
natural and manmade threats. 
(2) An evaluation of the types of facilities and the enhanced 
structural requirements required to deter the threat assessment 
specified in paragraph (1). 
(3) An assessment of the costs associated with the enhanced 
structural requirements specified in paragraph (2). 
SEC. 2824. REPORT ON CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS FOR GUAM. 
(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall pre-
pare a report— 
(1) detailing the civilian infrastructure improvements 
needed on Guam to directly and indirectly support and sustain 
the realignment of military installations and the relocation 
of military personnel on Guam; and 
(2) identifying, to the maximum extent practical, the poten-
tial funding sources for such improvements from other Federal 
departments and agencies and from existing authorities and 
funds within the Department of Defense. 
(b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall prepare 
the report required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Sec-
retary of Defense, the Government of Guam, and the Interagency 
Group on the Insular Areas established by Executive Order No. 
13537. 
(c) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall submit 
the report required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense 
committees and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House 
of Representatives, and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act. 
Subtitle D—Energy Security 
SEC. 2831. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE 
PRACTICES IN DEPARTMENT ENERGY PERFORMANCE 
PLAN. 
Section 2911(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘and hybrid-electric drive’’ 
after ‘‘alternative fuels’’; 
(2) by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (11); 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01013
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4468 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as para-
graphs (6) through (9), respectively; 
(4) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new para-
graph: 
‘‘(5) Opportunities for the high-performance construction, 
lease, operation, and maintenance of buildings.’’; and 
(5) by inserting after paragraph (9) (as redesignated by 
paragraph (3)) the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(10) The value of incorporating electric, hybrid-electric, 
and high efficiency vehicles into vehicle fleets.’’. 
SEC. 2832. ENHANCEMENT OF ENERGY SECURITY ACTIVITIES OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 
(a) ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN.— 
(1) ENHANCEMENT
OF
ENERGY
PERFORMANCE
PLAN
TO 
MASTER PLAN.—Subsection (b) of section 2911 of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘(b) ENERGY PERFORMANCE MASTER PLAN.—(1) The Secretary 
of Defense shall develop a comprehensive master plan for the 
achievement of the energy performance goals of the Department 
of Defense, as set forth in laws, executive orders, and Department 
of Defense policies. 
‘‘(2) The master plan shall include the following: 
‘‘(A) A separate master plan, developed by each military 
department and Defense Agency, for the achievement of energy 
performance goals. 
‘‘(B) The use of a baseline standard for the measurement 
of energy consumption by transportation systems, support sys-
tems, utilities, and facilities and infrastructure that is con-
sistent for all of the military departments. 
‘‘(C) A method of measurement of reductions or conserva-
tion in energy consumption that provides for the taking into 
account of changes in the current size of fleets, number of 
facilities, and overall square footage of facility plants. 
‘‘(D) Metrics to track annual progress in meeting energy 
performance goals. 
‘‘(E) A description of specific requirements, and proposed 
investments, in connection with the achievement of energy 
performance goals reflected in the budget of the President 
for each fiscal year (as submitted to Congress under section 
1105(a) of title 31). 
‘‘(3) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget 
of the President is submitted to Congress for a fiscal year under 
section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary shall submit the current 
version of the master plan to Congress.’’. 
(2) CONFORMING
AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further 
amended by striking ‘‘plan’’ each place it appears and inserting 
‘‘master plan’’. 
(3) SECTION HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such 
section is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2911. Energy performance goals and master plan for the 
Department of Defense’’. 
(b) EXPANSION OF FACILITIES FOR WHICH USE OF RENEWABLE 
ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENT PRODUCTS IS REQUIRED.— 
(1) RENEWABLE ENERGY.—Subsection (a) of section 2915 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
Deadline. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01014
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4469 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) by inserting ‘‘and facility repairs and renovations’’ 
after ‘‘military family housing projects)’’; and 
(B) by striking ‘‘energy performance plan’’ and inserting 
‘‘energy performance master plan’’. 
(2) CONSIDERATION IN DESIGN.—Subsection (b)(1) of such 
section is amended by striking ‘‘the design’’ and all that follows 
and inserting the following: ‘‘the design for the construction, 
repair, or renovation of facilities (including family housing and 
back-up power generation facilities) requires consideration of 
energy systems using solar energy or other renewable forms 
of energy when use of a renewable form of energy— 
‘‘(A) is consistent with the energy performance goals 
and energy performance master plan for the Department 
of Defense developed under section 2911 of this title; and 
‘‘(B) supported by the special considerations specified 
in subsection (c) of such section.’’. 
(3) ENERGY EFFICIENT PRODUCTS.—Subsection (e) of such 
section is amended— 
(A) by striking the heading and inserting the following: 
‘‘USE
OF ENERGY EFFICIENT PRODUCTS
IN FACILITIES.— 
’’; 
(B) in paragraph (1)— 
(i) by striking ‘‘new facility construction’’ and 
inserting ‘‘construction, repair, or renovation of facili-
ties’’; and 
(ii) by striking ‘‘energy performance plan’’ and 
inserting ‘‘energy performance master plan’’; 
(C) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 
and 
(D) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
paragraph (2): 
‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, energy efficient products 
may include, at a minimum, the following technologies, consistent 
with the products specified in paragraph (3): 
‘‘(A) Roof-top solar thermal, photovoltaic, and energy 
reducing coating technologies. 
‘‘(B) Energy management control and supervisory control 
and data acquisition systems. 
‘‘(C) Energy efficient heating, ventilation, and air condi-
tioning systems. 
‘‘(D) Thermal windows and insulation systems. 
‘‘(E) Electric meters. 
‘‘(F) Lighting, equipment, and appliances that are designed 
to use less electricity. 
‘‘(G) Hybrid vehicle plug-in charging stations. 
‘‘(H) Solar-power collecting structures to shade vehicle 
parking areas. 
‘‘(I) Wall and roof insulation systems and air infiltration- 
mitigation systems, such as weatherproofing.’’. 
(4) SECTION HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such 
section is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘§ 2915. Facilities: use of renewable forms of energy and 
energy efficient products’’. 
(c) OTHER AMENDMENTS.— 
10 USC 2915. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01015
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4470 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(1) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2925(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘energy perform-
ance plan’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘energy perform-
ance master plan’’. 
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the 
beginning of subchapter I of chapter 173 of such title is 
amended— 
(A) by striking the item relating to section 2911 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘2911. Energy performance goals and master plan for the Department of Defense.’’; 
and 
(B) by striking the item relating to section 2915 and 
inserting the following new item: 
‘‘2915. Facilities: use of renewable forms of energy and energy efficient products.’’. 
Subtitle E—Land Conveyances 
SEC. 2841. LAND CONVEYANCE, DEFENSE FUEL SUPPORT POINT (DFSP) 
WHITTIER, ALASKA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army or 
the Secretary of the Air Force may convey to the City of Whittier, 
Alaska (in this section referred to as the ‘‘City’’), all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, 
including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 
62 acres, located at the Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Whit-
tier, Alaska, that the Secretary making the conveyance considers 
appropriate in the public interest. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the conveyance under 
subsection (a), the City shall pay to the Secretary conveying the 
property an amount that is not less than the fair market value 
of the property conveyed, as determined by the Secretary. The 
Secretary’s determination shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion 
of cash payment of consideration, the Secretary may accept in- 
kind consideration, including environmental remediation for the 
property conveyed. 
(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary conveying property 
under subsection (a) shall require the City to reimburse the 
Secretary to cover costs (except costs for environmental remedi-
ation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to 
reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, 
to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including 
survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, 
and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. 
If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring 
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 
actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, 
the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City of 
Whittier. 
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 
as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 
the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred 
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts 
so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
account and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
Payments. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01016
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4471 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 
in such fund or account. 
(d) COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.—Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, 
or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid Waste 
Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.). 
(e) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Any cash 
payment received by the United States as consideration for the 
conveyance under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the special 
account in the Treasury established under subsection (b) of section 
572 of title 40, United States Code, and shall be available in 
accordance with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection. 
(f) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under 
this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
Secretary of the Interior. 
(g) ADDITIONAL
TERMS
AND
CONDITIONS.—The Secretary 
making the conveyance under subsection (a) may require such 
additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
the United States. 
SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORT KNOX, KENTUCKY. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may 
convey, without consideration, to the Department of Veterans 
Affairs of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (in this section referred 
to as the ‘‘Department’’) all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improve-
ments thereon, consisting of approximately 194 acres at Fort Knox, 
Kentucky, for the purpose of permitting the Department to establish 
and operate a State veterans home and future expansion of the 
adjacent State veterans cemetery for veterans and eligible family 
members of the Armed Forces. 
(b) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary determines at 
any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) 
is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance 
specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and 
to the property shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to 
the United States, and the United States shall have the right 
of immediate entry onto the property. Any determination of the 
Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after 
an opportunity for a hearing. 
(c) PAYMENT OR COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require the Depart-
ment to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to 
reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, 
to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including 
costs related to environmental documentation and other 
administrative costs. This paragraph does not apply to costs 
associated with the environmental remediation of the property 
to be conveyed. 
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 
as reimbursements under paragraph (1) shall be credited to 
the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred 
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01017
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4472 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or 
account and shall be available for the same purposes, and 
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 
in such fund or account. 
(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection 
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 
(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may 
require such additional terms and conditions in connection with 
the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
SEC. 2843. LAND CONVEYANCE, NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY (WEST 
BANK), NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Except as provided in sub-
section (b), the Secretary of the Navy may convey to the Algiers 
Development District all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the real property comprising the Naval Support 
Activity (West Bank), New Orleans, Louisiana, including— 
(1) any improvements and facilities on the real property; 
and 
(2) available personal property on the real property. 
(b) CERTAIN PROPERTY EXCLUDED.—The conveyance under sub-
section (a) may not include— 
(1) the approximately 29-acre area known as the Secured 
Area of the real property described in such subsection, which 
shall remain subject to the Lease; and 
(2) the Quarters A site, which is located at Sanctuary 
Drive, as determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary 
of the Navy. 
(c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection 
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary 
of the Navy. 
(d) TIMING.—The authority provided in subsection (a) may only 
be exercised after— 
(1) the Secretary of the Navy determines that the property 
described in subsection (a) is no longer needed by the Depart-
ment of the Navy; and 
(2) the Algiers Development District delivers the full consid-
eration as required by Article 3 of the Lease. 
(e) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance authorized 
by subsection (a) shall include a condition that expressly prohibits 
any use of the property that would interfere or otherwise restrict 
operations of the Department of the Navy in the Secured Area 
referred to in subsection (b), as determined by the Secretary of 
the Navy. 
(f) SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCE OF SECURED AREA.—If at any 
time the Secretary of the Navy determines and notifies the Algiers 
Development District that there is no longer a continuing require-
ment to occupy or otherwise control the Secured Area referred 
to in subsection (b) to support the mission of the Marine Forces 
Reserve or other comparable Marine Corps use, the Secretary may 
convey to the Algiers Development District the Secured Area and 
the any improvements situated thereon. 
(g) SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCE OF QUARTERS A.—If at any time 
the Secretary of the Navy determines that the Department of the 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01018
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4473 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Navy no longer has a continuing requirement for general officers 
quarters to be located on the Quarters A site referred to in sub-
section (b) or the Department of the Navy elects or offers to transfer, 
sell, lease, assign, gift or otherwise convey any or all of the Quarters 
A site or any improvements thereon to any third party, the Sec-
retary may convey to the Algiers Development District the real 
property containing the Quarters A site. 
(h) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 
Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connec-
tion with the conveyance of property under this section, consistent 
with the Lease, as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interest of the United States. 
(i) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) The term ‘‘Algiers Development District’’ means the 
Algiers Development District, a local political subdivision of 
the State of Louisiana. 
(2) The term ‘‘Lease’’ means that certain Real Estate Lease 
for Naval Support Activity New Orleans, West Bank, New 
Orleans, Louisiana, Lease No. N47692–08–RP–08P30, by and 
between the United States, acting by and through the Depart-
ment of the Navy, and the Algiers Development District dated 
September 30, 2008. 
SEC. 2844. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER NAVY EXTREMELY LOW FRE-
QUENCY COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT SITE, REPUBLIC, 
MICHIGAN. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
convey, without consideration, to Humboldt Township in Marquette 
County, Michigan, all right, title, and interest of the United States 
in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements 
thereon, in Republic, Michigan, consisting of approximately seven 
acres and formerly used as an Extremely Low Frequency commu-
nications project site, for the purpose of permitting the Township 
to use the property for public benefit. 
(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection 
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 
(c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may 
require such additional terms and conditions in connection with 
the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
SEC. 2845. LAND CONVEYANCE, MARINE FORCES RESERVE CENTER, 
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA. 
(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
convey to the North Carolina State Port Authority of Wilmington, 
North Carolina (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Port Authority’’), 
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel 
of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting 
of approximately 3.03 acres and known as the Marine Forces 
Reserve Center in Wilmington, North Carolina, for the purpose 
of permitting the Port Authority to use the parcel for development 
of a port facility and for other public purposes. 
(b) INCLUSION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.—The Secretary of the 
Navy may include as part of the conveyance under subsection 
(a) personal property of the Navy at the Marine Forces Reserve 
Center that the Secretary of Transportation recommends is appro-
priate for the development or operation of the port facility and 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01019
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4474 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
the Secretary of the Navy agrees is excess to the needs of the 
Navy. 
(c) INTERIM LEASE.—Until such time as the real property 
described in subsection (a) is conveyed by deed, the Secretary of 
the Navy may lease the property to the Port Authority. 
(d) CONSIDERATION.— 
(1) CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be made without consideration as a public benefit convey-
ance for port development if the Secretary of the Navy deter-
mines that the Port Authority satisfies the criteria specified 
in section 554 of title 40, United States Code, and regulations 
prescribed to implement such section. If the Secretary deter-
mines that the Port Authority fails to qualify for a public 
benefit conveyance, but still desires to acquire the property, 
the Port Authority shall pay to the United States an amount 
equal to the fair market value of the property to be conveyed. 
The fair market value of the property shall be determined 
by the Secretary. 
(2) LEASE.—The Secretary of the Navy may accept as 
consideration for a lease of the property under subsection (c) 
an amount that is less than fair market value if the Secretary 
determines that the public interest will be served as a result 
of the lease. 
(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of 
the Navy and the Port Authority. The cost of such survey shall 
be borne by the Port Authority. 
(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Navy may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the convey-
ance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests 
of the United States. 
Subtitle F—Other Matters 
SEC. 2851. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS PENDING REPORT 
REGARDING 
CONSTRUCTION 
OF 
A 
NEW 
OUTLYING 
LANDING FIELD IN NORTH CAROLINA AND VIRGINIA. 
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) The Navy has studied the feasibility and potential loca-
tions of a new outlying landing field on the East Coast since 
2001. 
(2) Since January 2008, the Navy has studied five potential 
sites in North Carolina and Virginia, whose communities have 
expressed opposition. Some local governments where the sites 
under consideration are located have taken formal action in 
opposition by resolution or correspondence to the Navy and 
congressional officials. 
(b) LIMITATION ON FUNDS PENDING REPORT.— 
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may not obli-
gate or expend funds for the study or development of a new 
outlying landing field in North Carolina or Virginia after fiscal 
year 2011 until the Secretary has provided the congressional 
defense committees a report on the Navy’s efforts with respect 
to the outlying landing field. 
Payments. 
Regulations. 
Determination. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01020
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4475 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required under para-
graph (1) shall include the following: 
(A) A description of the actual training requirements 
and completed training events involving Fleet Carrier 
Landing Practice operations at Naval Air Station Oceana 
and Naval Auxiliary Landing Field Fentress for the pre-
vious 10 years, to include statistics for the current fiscal 
year. 
(B) An assessment of the aviation training require-
ments and completed aviation training events conducted 
on all existing Navy outlying landing fields and installa-
tions located in North Carolina and Virginia, to include 
statistics for the current fiscal year. 
(C) An assessment of the suitability of all Naval 
installations in North Carolina and Virginia to conduct 
Fleet Carrier Landing Practice operations, including nec-
essary facility modifications and requirements to de-conflict 
with current operations at each installation. 
(D) A description of the estimated funding necessary 
to construct a new outlying landing field at each of the 
five sites under current consideration, and a cost compari-
son analysis between construction of a new outlying landing 
field versus use of an existing facility. 
(E) A description of all completed or pending environ-
mental studies conducted on any of the five sites currently 
under consideration, including the methodology, conclu-
sions, and recommendations. 
(F) Criteria for the basing of the Joint Strike Fighter 
F-35 aircraft and a description of the outlying landing 
field facilities that will be required to support its training 
requirements. 
SEC. 2852. REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PROVIDING WORLD CLASS 
MILITARY MEDICAL CENTERS. 
(a) UNIFIED CONSTRUCTION STANDARD FOR MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION AND REPAIRS TO MILITARY MEDICAL CENTERS.—Not later than 
180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Defense shall establish a unified construction standard for mili-
tary construction and repairs for military medical centers that 
provides a single standard of care. This standard shall also 
include— 
(1) size standards for operating rooms and patient recovery 
rooms; and 
(2) such other construction standards that the Secretary 
considers necessary to support military medical centers. 
(b) INDEPENDENT REVIEW PANEL.— 
(1) ESTABLISHMENT; PURPOSE.—The Secretary of Defense 
shall establish an independent advisory panel for the purpose 
of— 
(A) reviewing the unified construction standards estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (a) to determine the stand-
ards consistency with industry practices and benchmarks 
for world class medical construction; 
(B) reviewing ongoing construction programs within 
the Department of Defense to ensure medical construction 
standards are uniformly applied across applicable military 
medical centers; 
Deadline. 
10 USC 2802 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01021
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4476 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(C) assessing the approach of the Department of 
Defense approach to planning and programming facility 
improvements with specific emphasis on— 
(i) facility selection criteria and proportional 
assessment system; and 
(ii) facility programming responsibilities between 
the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs 
and the Secretaries of the military departments; 
(D) assessing whether the Comprehensive Master Plan 
for the National Capital Region Medical, dated April 2010, 
is adequate to fulfill statutory requirements, as required 
by section 2714 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 
84; 123 Stat. 2656), to ensure that the facilities and 
organizational structure described in the plan result in 
world class military medical centers in the National Capital 
Region; and 
(E) making recommendations regarding any adjust-
ments of the master plan referred to in subparagraph (D) 
that are needed to ensure the provision of world class 
military medical centers and delivery system in the 
National Capital Region. 
(2) MEMBERS.— 
(A) APPOINTMENTS BY SECRETARY.—The panel shall be 
composed of such members as determined by the Secretary 
of Defense, except that the Secretary shall include as mem-
bers— 
(i) medical facility design experts; 
(ii) military healthcare professionals; 
(iii) representatives of premier health care centers 
in the United States; and 
(iv) former retired senior military officers with 
joint operational and budgetary experience. 
(B) CONGRESSIONAL
APPOINTMENTS.—The chairmen 
and ranking members of the Committees on the Armed 
Services of the Senate and House of Representatives may 
each designate one member of the panel. 
(C) TERM.—Members of the panel may serve on the 
panel until the termination date specified in paragraph 
(7). 
(D) COMPENSATION.—While performing duties on 
behalf of the panel, a member and any adviser referred 
to in paragraph (4) shall be reimbursed under Government 
travel regulations for necessary travel expenses. 
(3) MEETINGS.—The panel shall meet not less than quar-
terly. The panel or its members may make other visits to 
military treatment centers and military headquarters in connec-
tion with the duties of the panel. 
(4) STAFF AND ADVISORS.—The Secretary of Defense shall 
provide necessary administrative staff support to the panel. 
The panel may call in advisers for consultation. 
(5) REPORTS.— 
(A) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after 
the first meeting of the panel, the panel shall submit 
to the Secretary of Defense a written report containing— 
Deadlines. 
Recommenda- 
tions. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01022
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4477 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(i) an assessment of the adequacy of the plan of 
the Department of Defense to address the items speci-
fied in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph 
(1) relating to the purposes of the panel; and 
(ii) the recommendations of the panel to improve 
the plan. 
(B) ADDITIONAL
REPORTS.—Not later than February 
1, 2011, and each February 1 thereafter until termination 
of the panel, the panel shall submit to the Secretary of 
Defense a report on the findings and recommendations 
of the panel to address any deficiencies identified by the 
panel. 
(6) ASSESSMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than 30 
days after the date of the submission of each report under 
paragraph (5), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report including— 
(A) a copy of the panel’s assessment; 
(B) an assessment by the Secretary of the findings 
and recommendations of the panel; and 
(C) the plans of the Secretary for addressing such 
findings and recommendations. 
(7) TERMINATION.—The panel shall terminate on September 
30, 2015. 
(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
(1) NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.—The term ‘‘National Capital 
Region’’ has the meaning given the term in section 2674(f) 
of title 10, United States Code. 
(2) WORLD CLASS MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER.—The term 
‘‘world class military medical center’’ has the meaning given 
the term ‘‘world class military medical facility’’ by the National 
Capital Region Base Realignment and Closure Health Systems 
Advisory Subcommittee of the Defense Health Board in 
appendix B of the report titled ‘‘Achieving World Class—An 
Independent Review of the Design Plans for the Walter Reed 
National Military Medical Center and the Fort Belvoir Commu-
nity Hospital’’ and published in May 2009, as required by 
section 2721 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 
Stat. 4716). 
SEC. 2853. REPORT ON FUEL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINMENT, RES-
TORATION, AND MODERNIZATION REQUIREMENTS. 
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report on the fuel infra-
structure of the Department of Defense. The report shall include 
the following: 
(1) Fiscal projections for fuel infrastructure sustainment, 
restoration, and modernization requirements to fully meet 
Department of Defense sustainment models and industry 
recapitalization practices. 
(2) An assessment of the risk associated with not providing 
adequate 
funding 
to 
support 
such 
fuel 
infrastructure 
sustainment, restoration, and modernization requirements. 
(3) An assessment of fuel infrastructure real property defi-
ciencies impacting the ability of the Defense Logistics Agency 
to fully support mission requirements. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01023
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4478 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(4) An assessment of environmental liabilities associated 
with current fueling operations. 
(5) A list of real property previously used to support fuel 
infrastructure and an assessment of the environmental liabil-
ities associated with such real property and whether any of 
such real property can be declared excess to the needs of 
the Department of Defense. 
(6) An assessment of the real property demarcation between 
the Secretaries of the military departments and the Defense 
Logistics Agency. 
SEC. 2854. NAMING OF ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER, MIDDLE-
TOWN, CONNECTICUT. 
The newly constructed Armed Forces Reserve Center in Middle-
town, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Major 
General Maurice Rose Armed Forces Reserve Center’’. Any reference 
in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States to such Armed Forces Reserve Center shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the Major General Maurice Rose 
Armed Forces Reserve Center. 
SEC. 2855. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROPOSED EXTENSION OF THE 
ALASKA RAILROAD CORRIDOR ACROSS FEDERAL LAND 
IN ALASKA. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the Alaska Railroad proposes 
the extension of its railroad corridor over approximately 950 acres 
of land located south and east of North Pole, Alaska, including 
lands located near or adjacent to the Chena River spillway, Eielson 
Air Force Base, Tanana Flats Training Area (Fort Wainwright), 
Donnelly Training Area (Fort Wainwright), and Fort Greely. 
(b) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force 
should explore means of accommodating the railroad corridor expan-
sion referred to in subsection (a) using existing authorities that 
will not adversely impact military missions, operations, and 
training. 
SEC. 2856. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPROVING MILITARY HOUSING 
FOR MEMBERS OF THE AIR FORCE. 
(a) FINDING.—Congress makes the following findings: 
(1) In the mid-1990s, the Department of Defense became 
concerned that inadequate and poor quality housing for mem-
bers of the Armed Forces was adversely affecting the quality 
of life for members and their families and adversely affecting 
military readiness by contributing to decisions by members 
to leave the Armed Forces. 
(2) At that time, the Department of Defense designated 
about 180,000 houses, or nearly two-thirds of its domestic 
family housing inventory, as inadequate and needing repair 
or complete replacement. 
(3) The Department of Defense believed that it would need 
about $20,000,000,000 in appropriated funds and would take 
up to 40 years to eliminate poor quality military housing 
through new construction or renovation using its traditional 
military construction approach. 
(4) In 1996, Congress enacted the Military Housing 
Privatization Initiative to provide the Department of Defense 
with a variety of authorities to obtain private sector financing 
Designation. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01024
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4479 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
and management for the repair, renovation, construction, and 
management of military family housing. 
(5) The Air Force has used the Military Housing Privatiza-
tion Initiative to award 27 projects at 44 military bases to 
improve over 37,000 homes. 
(6) The Air Force has received $7,100,000,000 in total 
development investment from the private sector for new 
housing with a taxpayer contribution of approximately 
$425,000,000, representing a 15 to 1 leveraging of taxpayer 
dollars. 
(7) The Air Force, like the other military services, has 
been able to leverage varying conditions of housing at military 
bases into fiscally viable projects by packaging housing inven-
tories at multiple bases into a single transaction. 
(8) Congress has approved transactions involving the pack-
aging of multiple bases as a critical tool to maximize the 
efficient use of taxpayer funds. 
(9) Congress supports the goal of the Air Force to complete 
transactions for the repair, renovation, construction, and 
management of 100 percent of their military family housing 
inventory in the United States by December 31, 2012. 
(10) The Air Force currently has 6 project solicitations 
prepared for open competition at 22 Air Force installations 
to improve over 15,000 homes. 
(b) SENSE
OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 
the Secretary of the Air Force should use existing authority to 
carry out solicitations for the 6 military housing projects involving 
the packaging of 22 bases consistent with the goal of improving 
15,000 homes for Air Force personnel and their families by 
December 31, 2012. 
SEC. 2857. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RECREATIONAL HUNTING 
AND FISHING ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 
It is the sense of the Congress that— 
(1) military installations that permit public access for rec-
reational hunting and fishing should continue to permit such 
hunting and fishing where appropriate; 
(2) permitting the public to access military installations 
for recreational hunting and fishing benefits local communities 
by conserving and promoting the outdoors and establishing 
positive relations between the civilian and defense sectors; 
(3) any military installations that make recreational 
hunting and fishing permits available for purchase should pro-
vide a discounted rate for active and retired members of the 
Armed Forces and veterans with disabilities; and 
(4) the Department of Defense, all of the service branches, 
and military installations that permit public access for rec-
reational hunting and fishing should promote access to such 
installations by making the appropriate accommodations for 
members of the Armed Forces and veterans with disabilities. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01025
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4480 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE XXIX—OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 
OPERATIONS MILITARY CONSTRUC-
TION 
Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 
Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition project. 
Sec. 2903. Authorized Defense Wide Construction and Land Acquisition Projects 
and Authorization of Appropriations. 
SEC. 2901. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS. 
(a) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Army: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Afghanistan .................
Bagram Air Base .....................................
$270,000,000 
Delaram II ................................................
$4,400,000 
Dwyer .......................................................
$74,100,000 
Frontenac .................................................
$8,400,000 
Kandahar .................................................
$80,400,000 
Maywand ..................................................
$7,000,000 
Shank ........................................................
$98,300,000 
Sharana ....................................................
$12,400,000 
Shindand ..................................................
$6,100,000 
Tarin Kowt ...............................................
$29,600,000 
Tombstone/Bastion ..................................
$112,600,000 
Various locations .....................................
$100,000,000 
Wolverine .................................................
$13,000,000 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—For military construction 
projects outside the United States authorized by subsection 
(a), funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
years beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total amount 
of $816,300,000. 
(2) 
UNSPECIFIED
MINOR
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total amount of 
$78,350,000. 
(3) ARCHITECTURAL
AND
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
AND 
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN.—For architectural and engineering 
services and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, funds are hereby authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 
2010, in the total amount of $79,716,000. 
(4) OVERSIGHT.—For the Department of Defense Inspector 
General, funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total 
amount of $7,000,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01026
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4481 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 2902. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECT. 
(a) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Air 
Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, 
and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 
Air Force: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Oman ...........................
Al Musannah ............................................
$69,000,000 
Qatar ............................
Al Udeid ...................................................
$63,000,000 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—For military construction 
projects outside the United States authorized by subsection 
(a), funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
years beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total amount 
of $132,000,000. 
(2) 
UNSPECIFIED
MINOR
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS.—For unspecified minor military construction projects 
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, 
funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total amount of 
$49,584,000. 
(3) ARCHITECTURAL
AND
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
AND 
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN.—For architectural and engineering 
services and construction design under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, funds are hereby authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 
2010, in the total amount of $13,422,000. 
SEC. 2903. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE WIDE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 
ACQUISITION PROJECTS AND AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO-
PRIATIONS. 
(a) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of Defense 
may acquire real property and carry out military construction 
projects for the Defense Agencies for the installations or locations 
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the 
following table: 
Defense Wide: Outside the United States 
Country 
Installation or Location 
Amount 
Classified Location .....
Classified Project .....................................
$41,900,000 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 
(1) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—For military construction 
projects outside the United States authorized by subsection 
(a), funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
years beginning after September 30, 2010, in the total amount 
of $41,900,000. 
(2) ARCHITECTURAL
AND
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
AND 
CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN.—For architectural and engineering 
services and construction design authorized by section 2807 
of title 10, United States Code, funds are hereby authorized 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01027
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4482 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 
30, 2010, in the total amount of $4,600,000. 
TITLE XXX—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
FUNDING TABLES 
Sec. 3001. Military construction. 
Sec. 3002. Overseas contingency operations. 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Alabama 
Army 
Fort Rucker 
Aviation Component Maintenance Shop ...
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Fort Rucker 
Aviation Maintenance Facility ...................
36,000 
36,000 
Army 
Fort Rucker 
Training Aids Center ..................................
4,650 
4,650 
Alaska 
Army 
Fort Greely 
Fire Station .................................................
26,000 
26,000 
Army 
Fort Richardson 
Brigade Complex, Ph 1 ...............................
67,038 
67,038 
Army 
Fort Richardson 
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range ...........
12,200 
12,200 
Army 
Fort Richardson 
Simulations Center .....................................
34,000 
34,000 
Army 
Fort Wainwright 
Aviation Task Force Complex, Ph 1 Incr 2 
30,000 
0 
Army 
Fort Wainwright 
Aviation Task Force Complex, Ph 2A 
(Hangar).
142,650 
142,650 
Army 
Fort Wainwright 
Aviation Task Force Complex, Ph 2B 
(Company Ops Facility).
27,000 
27,000 
Army 
Fort Wainwright 
Urban Assault Course ................................
3,350 
3,350 
California 
Army 
Fort Irwin 
Water Treatment and Distro System ........
0 
0 
Army 
Presidio Monterey 
Advanced Individual Training Barracks ...
63,000 
63,000 
Army 
Presidio Monterey 
General Instruction Building .....................
39,000 
39,000 
Army 
Presidio Monterey 
Satellite Communications Facility ............
38,000 
38,000 
Colorado 
Army 
Fort Carson 
Automated Sniper Field Fire Range .........
3,650 
3,650 
Army 
Fort Carson 
Battalion Headquarters ..............................
6,700 
6,700 
Army 
Fort Carson 
Brigade Complex .........................................
56,000 
56,000 
Army 
Fort Carson 
Simulations Center .....................................
40,000 
40,000 
Florida 
Army 
Eglin Ab 
Chapel ..........................................................
6,900 
6,900 
Army 
Miami-Dade Coun-
ty 
Command & Control Facility .....................
41,000 
41,000 
Army 
US Army Garrison 
Miami 
Commissary .................................................
19,000 
0 
Georgia 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Land Acquisition .........................................
12,200 
12,200 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Museum Operations Support Building .....
32,000 
0 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Trainee Barracks, Ph 2 ..............................
51,000 
51,000 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Training Battalion Complex, Ph 2 ............
14,600 
14,600 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Training Battalion Complex, Ph 2 ............
14,600 
14,600 
Army 
Fort Benning 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
53,000 
53,000 
Army 
Fort Gordon 
Qualification Training Range ....................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Gordon 
Training Aids Center ..................................
4,150 
4,150 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Automated 
Infantry 
Platoon 
Battle 
Course.
6,200 
6,200 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 
Range.
9,100 
9,100 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Aviation Unit Operations Complex ...........
47,000 
47,000 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Battalion Complex ......................................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
General Instruction Building .....................
8,200 
8,200 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Modified Record Fire Range ......................
3,750 
3,750 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Simulations Center .....................................
26,000 
26,000 
Army 
Fort Stewart 
Training Aids Center ..................................
7,000 
7,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01028
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4483 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Hawaii 
Army 
Fort Shafter 
Command & Control Facility, Ph 1 ...........
58,000 
58,000 
Army 
Fort Shafter 
Flood Mitigation ..........................................
23,000 
23,000 
Army 
Schofield Barracks 
Barracks ......................................................
98,000 
98,000 
Army 
Schofield Barracks 
Barracks ......................................................
90,000 
90,000 
Army 
Schofield Barracks 
Training Aids Center ..................................
24,000 
24,000 
Army 
Tripler Army Med-
ical Center 
Barracks ......................................................
28,000 
28,000 
Kansas 
Army 
Fort Leavenworth 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
7,100 
7,100 
Army 
Fort Riley 
Automated Infantry Squad Battle Course 
4,100 
4,100 
Army 
Fort Riley 
Automated Qualification/Training Range
14,800 
14,800 
Army 
Fort Riley 
Battalion Complex, Ph 1 ............................
31,000 
31,000 
Army 
Fort Riley 
Known Distance Range ..............................
7,200 
7,200 
Kentucky 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Automated Sniper Field Fire Range .........
1,500 
1,500 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Brigade Complex .........................................
67,000 
67,000 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Company Operations Facilities ..................
25,000 
25,000 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Infantry Squad Battle Course ...................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Rappelling Training Area ...........................
5,600 
5,600 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Shoot House ................................................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Unit Operations Facilities ..........................
26,000 
26,000 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Urban Assault Course ................................
3,300 
3,300 
Army 
Fort Campbell 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
15,500 
15,500 
Army 
Fort Knox 
Access Corridor Improvements ..................
6,000 
6,000 
Army 
Fort Knox 
Military Operation Urban Terrain Collec-
tive Training Facility.
12,800 
12,800 
Army 
Fort Knox 
Rail Head Upgrade .....................................
0 
0 
Louisiana 
Army 
Fort Polk 
Barracks ......................................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Fort Polk 
Emergency Services Center .......................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Polk 
Heavy Sniper Range ...................................
4,250 
4,250 
Army 
Fort Polk 
Land Acquisition .........................................
24,000 
24,000 
Army 
Fort Polk 
Land Acquisition .........................................
6,000 
6,000 
Maryland 
Army 
Aberdeen Proving 
Ground 
Auto Tech Evaluate Facility, Ph 2 ............
14,600 
14,600 
Army 
Fort Meade 
Indoor Firing Range ...................................
7,600 
7,600 
Army 
Fort Meade 
Wideband SATCOM Operations Center ...
25,000 
25,000 
Missouri 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Barracks ......................................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Brigade Headquarters ................................
12,200 
12,200 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
General Instruction Building .....................
7,000 
7,000 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Information Systems Facility .....................
15,500 
15,500 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Training Barracks .......................................
19,000 
19,000 
Army 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Transient Advanced Trainee Barracks, Ph 
2.
29,000 
29,000 
New Mexico 
Army 
White Sands 
Barracks ......................................................
29,000 
29,000 
New York 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Aircraft Fuel Storage Complex ..................
14,600 
14,600 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ....................
16,500 
16,500 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Alert Holding Area Facility .......................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Battalion Complex ......................................
61,000 
61,000 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Brigade Complex, Ph 1 ...............................
55,000 
55,000 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Infantry Squad Battle Course ...................
8,200 
8,200 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Railhead Loading Area ...............................
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Training Aids Center ..................................
18,500 
18,500 
Army 
Fort Drum 
Transient Training Barracks .....................
55,000 
55,000 
Army 
U.S. Military 
Academy 
Science Facility, Ph 2 .................................
130,624 
130,624 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01029
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4484 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Army 
U.S. Military 
Academy 
Urban Assault Course ................................
1,700 
1,700 
North Carolina 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Battalion Complex ......................................
33,000 
33,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Brigade Complex .........................................
41,000 
41,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Brigade Complex .........................................
25,000 
25,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Brigade Complex .........................................
50,000 
50,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Command and Control Facility .................
53,000 
53,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Company Operations Facilities ..................
12,600 
12,600 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Dining Facility ............................................
11,200 
11,200 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Murchison Road Right of Way Acquisition 
17,000 
17,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Staging Area Complex ................................
14,600 
14,600 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Student Barracks ........................................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
7,500 
7,500 
Army 
Fort Bragg 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
28,000 
28,000 
Oklahoma 
Army 
Fort Sill 
General Purpose Storage Building ............
13,800 
13,800 
Army 
Fort Sill 
Museum Operations Support Building .....
12,800 
0 
Army 
McAlester 
Igloo Storage, Depot Level .........................
3,000 
3,000 
South Carolina 
Army 
Fort Jackson 
Trainee Barracks ........................................
28,000 
28,000 
Army 
Fort Jackson 
Trainee Barracks Complex, Ph 1 ...............
46,000 
46,000 
Army 
Fort Jackson 
Training Aids Center ..................................
17,000 
17,000 
Texas 
Army 
Corpus Christi 
NAS 
Rotor Blade Processing Facility, Ph 2 .......
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 
Range.
6,700 
6,700 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Company Operations Facilities ..................
18,500 
18,500 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Digital Multipurpose Training Range .......
22,000 
22,000 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Heavy Sniper Range ...................................
3,500 
3,500 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Indoor Swimming Pool ...............................
15,500 
15,500 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Light Demolition Range .............................
2,100 
2,100 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse ...................
3,150 
3,150 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Scout/Reconnaissance Crew Engagement 
Gunnery Complex.
15,500 
15,500 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Squad Defense Range .................................
3,000 
3,000 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Theater High Altitude Area Defense Bat-
tery Complex.
17,500 
17,500 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Transient Training Complex ......................
31,000 
31,000 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Urban Assault Course ................................
2,800 
2,800 
Army 
Fort Bliss 
Vehicle Bridge Overpass ............................
8,700 
8,700 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Battalion Complex ......................................
40,000 
40,000 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Brigade Complex .........................................
38,000 
38,000 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Company Operations Facilities ..................
4,300 
4,300 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Convoy Live Fire .........................................
3,200 
3,200 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse ...................
2,100 
2,100 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Soldier Readiness Processing Center ........
0 
0 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Unmanned Aerial System Hangar ............
55,000 
55,000 
Army 
Fort Hood 
Urban Assault Course ................................
2,450 
2,450 
Army 
Fort Sam Houston 
Simulations Center .....................................
16,000 
16,000 
Army 
Fort Sam Houston 
Training Aids Center ..................................
6,200 
6,200 
Virginia 
Army 
Fort A.P. Hill 
1200 Meter Range .......................................
14,500 
14,500 
Army 
Fort A.P. Hill 
Indoor Firing Range ...................................
6,200 
6,200 
Army 
Fort A.P. Hill 
Known Distance Range ..............................
3,800 
3,800 
Army 
Fort A.P. Hill 
Light Demolition Range .............................
4,100 
4,100 
Army 
Fort A.P. Hill 
Military Operation Urban Terrain Collec-
tive Training Facility.
65,000 
65,000 
Army 
Fort Eustis 
Warrior in Transition Complex .................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Fort Lee 
Automated Qualification Training Range
7,700 
7,700 
Army 
Fort Lee 
Company Operations Facility ....................
4,900 
4,900 
Army 
Fort Lee 
Museum Operations Support Building .....
30,000 
0 
Army 
Fort Lee 
Training Aids Center ..................................
5,800 
5,800 
Washington 
Army 
Fort Lewis 
Barracks ......................................................
47,000 
47,000 
Army 
Fort Lewis 
Barracks Complex .......................................
40,000 
40,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01030
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4485 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Army 
Fort Lewis 
Rappelling Training Area ...........................
5,300 
5,300 
Army 
Fort Lewis 
Regional Logistic Support Complex ..........
63,000 
63,000 
Army 
Fort Lewis 
Regional Logistic Support Complex Ware-
house.
16,500 
16,500 
Army 
Yakima 
Sniper Field Fire Range .............................
3,750 
3,750 
Afghanistan 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Army Aviation HQ Facilities .....................
19,000 
19,000 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Barracks ......................................................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Consolidated Community Support Area ...
14,800 
14,800 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Eastside Electrical Distribution ................
10,400 
10,400 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Eastside Utilities Infrastructure ...............
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Entry Control Point ....................................
7,500 
7,500 
Army 
Bagram AB 
Joint Defense Operations Center ..............
2,800 
2,800 
Germany 
Army 
Ansbach 
Physical Fitness Center .............................
13,800 
13,800 
Army 
Ansbach 
Vehicle Maintenance Shop .........................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Grafenwoehr 
Barracks ......................................................
20,000 
20,000 
Army 
Grafenwoehr 
Barracks ......................................................
19,000 
19,000 
Army 
Grafenwoehr 
Barracks ......................................................
19,000 
19,000 
Army 
Grafenwoehr 
Barracks ......................................................
17,500 
17,500 
Army 
Rhine Ordnance 
Barracks 
Barracks Complex .......................................
35,000 
35,000 
Army 
Sembach AB 
Confinement Facility ..................................
9,100 
9,100 
Army 
Wiesbaden AB 
Command and Battle Center, Incr 2 .........
59,500 
59,500 
Army 
Wiesbaden AB 
Construct New Access Control Point ........
5,100 
5,100 
Army 
Wiesbaden AB 
Information Processing Center ..................
30,400 
30,400 
Army 
Wiesbaden AB 
Sensitive 
Compartmented 
Information 
Facility.
91,000 
91,000 
Honduras 
Army 
Soto Cano AB 
Barracks ......................................................
20,400 
20,400 
Italy 
Army 
Vicenza 
Brigade Complex—Barracks/Community, 
Incr 4.
26,000 
26,000 
Army 
Vicenza 
Brigade 
Complex—Operations 
Support 
Facility, Incr 4.
25,000 
25,000 
Korea 
Army 
Camp Walker 
Electrical System Upgrade & Natural Gas 
System.
19,500 
19,500 
Unspecified 
Army 
Troop Trainee 
Housing 
Training Barracks .......................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Host Nation Support FY 11 .......................
28,000 
28,000 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Minor Construction FY 11 .........................
23,000 
23,000 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design FY 11 .......................
221,636 
221,636 
Total Military Construction, Army 
4,078,798 
3,954,998 
Alabama 
Navy 
Mobile 
T–6 Outlying Landing Field ......................
29,082 
29,082 
Arizona 
Navy 
Yuma 
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ....................
40,600 
40,600 
Navy 
Yuma 
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ....................
63,280 
63,280 
Navy 
Yuma 
Communications Infrastructure Upgrade
63,730 
63,730 
Navy 
Yuma 
Intermediate Maintenance Activity Facil-
ity.
21,480 
21,480 
Navy 
Yuma 
Simulator Facility .......................................
36,060 
36,060 
Navy 
Yuma 
Utilities Infrastructure Upgrades .............
44,320 
44,320 
Navy 
Yuma 
Van Pad Complex Relocation .....................
15,590 
15,590 
California 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—13 Area .......
42,864 
42,864 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Las Flores ..
37,020 
37,020 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01031
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4486 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Center for Naval Aviation Technical 
Training/Fleet 
Replacement 
Squad-
ron—Aviation Training and Bachelor 
Enlisted Quarters.
66,110 
66,110 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Conveyance/Water Treatment ...................
100,700 
100,700 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron–39 
Maintenance Hangar Expansion.
48,230 
48,230 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Marine Corps Energy Initiative ................
9,950 
9,950 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
North Region Tert Treat Plant (Incre-
mented).
30,000 
30,000 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Small Arms Magazine—Edson Range .......
3,760 
3,760 
Navy 
Camp Pendleton 
Truck Company Operations Complex .......
53,490 
53,490 
Navy 
Coronado 
Maritime Expeditionary Security Group- 
One (Mesg–1) Consolidated Boat Main-
tenance Facility.
0 
0 
Navy 
Coronado 
Rotary Hangar ............................................
67,160 
67,160 
Navy 
Miramar 
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ....................
90,490 
90,490 
Navy 
Miramar 
Hangar 4 ......................................................
33,620 
33,620 
Navy 
Miramar 
Parking Apron/Taxiway Expansion ...........
66,500 
66,500 
Navy 
Monterey NSA 
International Academic Instruction Build-
ing.
0 
0 
Navy 
San Diego 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Homeport 
Ashore.
75,342 
75,342 
Navy 
San Diego 
Berthing Pier 12 Replace & Dredging, Ph 
1.
108,414 
108,414 
Navy 
San Diego 
Marine Corps Energy Initiative ................
9,950 
9,950 
Navy 
Twentynine Palms 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters & Parking 
Structure.
53,158 
53,158 
Connecticut 
Navy 
New London NSB 
Submarine Group 2 Headquarters ............
0 
0 
Florida 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Consolidated Warehouse Facility ..............
17,260 
17,260 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Container Staging and Loading Lot ..........
5,990 
5,990 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Container Storage Lot ................................
4,910 
4,910 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Hardstand Extension ..................................
17,930 
17,930 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Paint and Blast Facility .............................
18,840 
18,840 
Navy 
Blount Island 
Washrack Expansion ..................................
9,690 
9,690 
Navy 
Panama City NSA 
Land Acquisition .........................................
0 
0 
Navy 
Panama City NSA 
Purchase 9 Acres ........................................
0 
0 
Navy 
Tampa 
Joint Comms Support Element Vehicle 
Paint Facility.
2,300 
0 
Georgia 
Navy 
Albany MCLB 
Maintenance Center Test Firing Range ...
0 
0 
Navy 
Kings Bay 
Security Enclave & Vehicle Barriers ........
45,004 
45,004 
Navy 
Kings Bay 
Waterfront Emergency Power ....................
15,660 
15,660 
Hawaii 
Navy 
Camp Smith 
Physical Fitness Center .............................
29,960 
29,960 
Navy 
Kaneohe Bay 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters .......................
90,530 
90,530 
Navy 
Kaneohe Bay 
Waterfront Operations Facility .................
19,130 
19,130 
Navy 
Pacific Missile 
Range Facility 
Replace North Loop Electrical Distribu-
tion System.
0 
0 
Navy 
Pearl Harbor 
Center for Disaster Mgt/Humanitarian 
Assistance.
9,140 
9,140 
Navy 
Pearl Harbor 
Fire Station, West Loch .............................
0 
0 
Navy 
Pearl Harbor 
Joint Pow/Mia Accounting Command .......
99,328 
99,328 
Navy 
Pearl Harbor 
Pre-Fab Bridge Nohili Ditch ......................
0 
0 
Navy 
Pearl Harbor 
Welding School Shop Consolidation ..........
0 
0 
Maine 
Navy 
Portsmouth NSY 
Consolidation of Structural Shops .............
0 
0 
Navy 
Portsmouth NSY 
Structural Shops Addition, Ph 1 ...............
0 
0 
Maryland 
Navy 
Indian Head 
Advanced Energetics Research Lab Com-
plex Phase 2.
0 
0 
Navy 
Indian Head 
Agile Chemical Facility, Ph 2 ....................
34,238 
34,238 
Navy 
Patuxent River 
Atlantic Test Range Addition ....................
0 
0 
Navy 
Patuxent River 
Broad Area Maritime Surveillance & E 
Facility.
42,211 
42,211 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01032
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4487 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Mississippi 
Navy 
Gulfport 
Branch Health Clinic ..................................
0 
0 
North Carolina 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
2nd 
Intel 
Battalion 
Maintenance/Ops 
Complex.
90,270 
90,270 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Armory- II Mef—Wallace Creek ................
12,280 
12,280 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Courthouse 
Bay.
42,330 
42,330 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Courthouse 
Bay.
40,780 
40,780 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor 
Enlisted 
Quarters—French 
Creek.
43,640 
43,640 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Rifle Range 
55,350 
55,350 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor 
Enlisted 
Quarters—Wallace 
Creek.
51,660 
51,660 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor 
Enlisted 
Quarters—Wallace 
Creek North.
46,290 
46,290 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters—Camp John-
son.
46,550 
46,550 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Explosive Ordnanance Disposal Unit Ad-
dition—2nd Marine Logistics Group.
7,420 
7,420 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Hangar .........................................................
73,010 
73,010 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Maintenance Hangar ..................................
74,260 
74,260 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Maintenance/Ops 
Complex—2nd 
Air 
Naval Gunfire Liaison Company.
36,100 
36,100 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Marine Corps Energy Initiative ................
9,950 
9,950 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Mess Hall—French Creek ..........................
25,960 
25,960 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Mess Hall Addition—Courthouse Bay ......
2,553 
2,553 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Motor 
Transportation/Communications 
Maintenance Facility.
18,470 
18,470 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Utility Expansion—Hadnot Point ..............
56,470 
56,470 
Navy 
Camp Lejeune 
Utility Expansion—French Creek .............
56,050 
56,050 
Navy 
Cherry Point Ma-
rine Corps Air 
Station 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters .......................
42,500 
42,500 
Navy 
Cherry Point Ma-
rine Corps Air 
Station 
Mariners Bay Land Acquisition—Bogue ...
3,790 
3,790 
Navy 
Cherry Point Ma-
rine Corps Air 
Station 
Missile Magazine ........................................
13,420 
13,420 
Navy 
Cherry Point Ma-
rine Corps Air 
Station 
Station Infrastructure Upgrades ...............
5,800 
5,800 
Pennsylvania 
Navy 
Naval Support Ac-
tivity Mechan-
icsburg 
North Gate Security Improvements ..........
0 
0 
Navy 
Naval Support Ac-
tivity Mechan-
icsburg 
Quiet Propulsion Load House ....................
0 
0 
Rhode Island 
Navy 
Newport 
Electromagnetic Facility ............................
27,007 
27,007 
Navy 
Newport 
Gate Improvements ....................................
0 
0 
Navy 
Newport 
Submarine Payloads Integration Labora-
tory.
0 
0 
South Carolina 
Navy 
Beaufort 
Air Installation Compatable Use Zone 
Land Acquisition.
21,190 
21,190 
Navy 
Beaufort 
Aircraft Hangar ...........................................
46,550 
46,550 
Navy 
Beaufort 
Physical Fitness Center .............................
15,430 
15,430 
Navy 
Beaufort 
Training and Simulator Facility ................
46,240 
46,240 
Texas 
Navy 
Kingsville NAS 
Youth Center ...............................................
0 
0 
Virginia 
Navy 
Dahlgren 
Building 1200—Missile Support Facility 
Replacement Phase 1.
0 
0 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01033
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4488 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Navy 
Norfolk 
Pier 9 & 10 Upgrades for Ddg 1000 ..........
2,400 
2,400 
Navy 
Norfolk 
Pier 1 Upgrades to Berth Usns Comfort ...
10,035 
10,035 
Navy 
Portsmouth 
Ship Repair Pier Replacement, Incr 2 ......
100,000 
100,000 
Navy 
Quantico 
Academic Facility Addition—Staff Non 
Comissioned Officer Academy.
12,080 
12,080 
Navy 
Quantico 
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters .......................
37,810 
37,810 
Navy 
Quantico 
Research Center Addition—MCU ..............
37,920 
37,920 
Navy 
Quantico 
Student 
Officer 
Quarters—the 
Basic 
School.
55,822 
55,822 
Washington 
Navy 
Bangor 
Commander 
Submarine 
Development 
Squadron 5 Laboratory Expansion Ph1.
16,170 
16,170 
Navy 
Bangor 
Limited Area Emergency Power ................
15,810 
15,810 
Navy 
Bangor 
Waterfront Restricted Area Emergency 
Power.
24,913 
24,913 
Navy 
Naval Base Kitsap 
Charleston Gate Ecp Improvements .........
0 
0 
Navy 
Naval Base Kitsap 
Limited Area Product/Strg Complex (In-
cremented).
19,116 
19,116 
Bahrain Island 
Navy 
SW Asia 
Navy 
Central 
Command 
Ammunition 
Magazines.
89,280 
89,280 
Navy 
SW Asia 
Operations and Support Facilities ............
60,002 
60,002 
Navy 
SW Asia 
Waterfront Development, Ph 3 ..................
63,871 
63,871 
Guam 
Navy 
Guam 
Anderson AFB North Ramp Parking, Ph 
1, Inc 2.
93,588 
0 
Navy 
Guam 
Anderson AFB North Ramp Utilities, Ph 
1, Inc 2.
79,350 
0 
Navy 
Guam 
Apra Harbor Wharves Improvements, Ph 
1.
40,000 
40,000 
Navy 
Guam 
Defense Access Roads Improvements ........
66,730 
66,730 
Navy 
Guam 
Finegayan Site Prep and Utilities .............
147,210 
0 
Japan 
Navy 
Atsugi 
MH–60r/S Trainer Facility ........................
6,908 
6,908 
Spain 
Navy 
Rota 
Air Traffic Control Tower ...........................
23,190 
23,190 
Djibouti 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
Camp Lemonier HQ Facility ......................
12,407 
0 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
General Warehouse ....................................
7,324 
7,324 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
Horn of Africa Joint Operations Center ...
28,076 
0 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
Pave External Roads ..................................
3,824 
3,824 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design ..................................
120,050 
120,050 
Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction ................
20,877 
20,877 
Total Military Construction, Navy 
3,879,104 
3,516,173 
Alabama 
AF 
Maxwell AFB 
Adal Air University Library ......................
13,400 
13,400 
Alaska 
AF 
Eielson AFB 
Repair Central Heat Plant & Power Plant 
Boilers.
28,000 
28,000 
AF 
Elmendorf AFB 
Add/Alter Air Support Operations Squad-
ron Training.
4,749 
4,749 
AF 
Elmendorf AFB 
Construct Railhead Operations Facility ...
15,000 
15,000 
AF 
Elmendorf AFB 
Dod Joint Regional Fire Training Facility 
0 
0 
AF 
Elmendorf AFB 
F–22 Add/Alter Weapons Release Systems 
Shop.
10,525 
10,525 
Arizona 
AF 
Davis-Monthan 
AFB 
Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration 
Group Hangar.
25,000 
25,000 
AF 
Davis-Monthan 
AFB 
HC–130 Aerospace Ground Equipment 
Maintenance Facility.
4,600 
4,600 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01034
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4489 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
AF 
Davis-Monthan 
AFB 
HC–130J Aerial Cargo Facility .................
10,700 
10,700 
AF 
Davis-Monthan 
AFB 
HC–130J Parts Store ..................................
8,200 
8,200 
AF 
Fort Huachuca 
Total Force Integration-Predator Launch 
and Recovery Element Beddown.
11,000 
0 
AF 
Luke AFB 
F–35 Academic Training Center ................
0 
54,150 
AF 
Luke AFB 
F–35 Squadron Operations Facility ..........
0 
10,260 
California 
AF 
Edwards AFB 
Flightline Fire Station ................................
0 
0 
AF 
Los Angeles AFB 
Consolidated Parking Area, Ph 2 ..............
0 
0 
Colorado 
AF 
Buckley AFB 
Land Acquisition .........................................
0 
0 
AF 
Buckley AFB 
Security Forces Operations Facility ..........
12,160 
12,160 
AF 
Peterson AFB 
Rapid Attack Identification Detection Re-
pair System Space Control Facility.
24,800 
24,800 
AF 
U.S. Air Force 
Academy 
Const Center for Character & Leadership 
Development.
27,600 
27,600 
Delaware 
AF 
Dover AFB 
C–5M/C–17 Maintenance Training Facil-
ity, Ph 2.
3,200 
3,200 
District of Columbia 
AF 
Bolling AFB 
Joint Air Defense Operations Center ........
13,200 
13,200 
Florida 
AF 
Eglin AFB 
F–35 Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar ........
11,400 
11,400 
AF 
Hurlburt Field 
Adal Special Operations School Facility ...
6,170 
6,170 
AF 
Hurlburt Field 
Add to Visiting Quarters (24 Rm) .............
4,500 
4,500 
AF 
Hurlburt Field 
Base Logistics Facility ................................
24,000 
24,000 
AF 
Patrick AFB 
Air Force Technical Application Center ....
158,009 
158,009 
AF 
Patrick AFB 
Relocate Main Gate ....................................
0 
0 
Georgia 
AF 
Robins AFB 
54th Combat Communications Squadron 
Warehouse Facility, Ph 2.
0 
0 
Louisiana 
AF 
Barksdale AFB 
Weapons Load Crew Training Facility .....
18,140 
18,140 
Missouri 
AF 
Whiteman AFB 
Consolidated Air Ops Facility ....................
0 
0 
Montana 
AF 
Malmstrom AFB 
Physical Fitness Center, Phase II .............
0 
0 
Nebraska 
AF 
Offutt AFB 
Kenney/Bellevue Gates ...............................
0 
0 
Nevada 
AF 
Creech AFB 
UAS Airfield Fire/Crash Rescue Station ..
11,710 
11,710 
AF 
Nellis AFB 
Communication Network Control Center
0 
0 
AF 
Nellis AFB 
F–35 Add/Alter 422 Test Evaluation 
Squadron Facility.
7,870 
7,870 
AF 
Nellis AFB 
F–35 Add/Alter Flight Test Instrumenta-
tion Facility.
1,900 
1,900 
AF 
Nellis AFB 
F–35 Flight Simulator Facility ..................
13,110 
13,110 
AF 
Nellis AFB 
F–35 Maintenance Hangar ........................
28,760 
28,760 
New Jersey 
AF 
McGuire AFB 
Base Ops/Command Post Facility (TFI) ...
8,000 
8,000 
AF 
McGuire AFB 
Dormitory (120 Rm) ....................................
18,440 
18,440 
New Mexico 
AF 
Cannon AFB 
Dormitory (96 Rm) ......................................
14,000 
14,000 
AF 
Cannon AFB 
Family Support Center ...............................
0 
0 
AF 
Cannon AFB 
UAS Squadron Ops Facility .......................
20,000 
20,000 
AF 
Holloman AFB 
Parallel Taxiway, Runway 07/25 ...............
0 
0 
AF 
Holloman AFB 
UAS Add/Alter Maintenance Hangar .......
15,470 
15,470 
AF 
Holloman AFB 
UAS Maintenance Hangar .........................
22,500 
22,500 
AF 
Kirtland AFB 
Aerial Delivery Facility Addition ..............
3,800 
3,800 
AF 
Kirtland AFB 
Armament Shop ..........................................
6,460 
6,460 
AF 
Kirtland AFB 
H/MC–130 Fuel System Maintenance Fa-
cility.
14,142 
14,142 
AF 
Kirtland AFB 
Military Working Dog Facility ...................
0 
0 
AF 
Kirtland AFB 
Replace Fire Station 3 ................................
0 
0 
New York 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01035
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4490 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
AF 
Fort Drum 
20th Air Support Operations Squadron 
Complex.
20,440 
20,440 
North Carolina 
AF 
Pope AFB 
Crash/Fire/Rescue Station ..........................
0 
0 
North Dakota 
AF 
Grand Forks AFB 
Central Deployment Center .......................
0 
0 
AF 
Minot AFB 
Control Tower/Base Operations Facility ...
18,770 
18,770 
Oklahoma 
AF 
Tinker AFB 
Air Traffic Control Tower ...........................
0 
0 
AF 
Tinker AFB 
Upgrade Building 3001 Infrastructure, Ph 
3.
14,000 
14,000 
South Carolina 
AF 
Charleston AFB 
Civil Engineer Complex (TFI)—Ph 1 ........
15,000 
15,000 
South Dakota 
AF 
Ellsworth AFB 
Maintenance Training Facility ..................
0 
0 
Texas 
AF 
Dyess AFB 
C–130J Add/Alter Flight Simulator Facil-
ity.
4,080 
4,080 
AF 
Ellington Field 
Upgrade Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Main-
tenance Hangar.
7,000 
0 
AF 
Lackland AFB 
Basic Military Training Satellite Class-
room/Dining Facility No 2.
32,000 
32,000 
AF 
Lackland AFB 
One-Company Fire Station ........................
5,500 
5,500 
AF 
Lackland AFB 
Recruit Dormitory, Ph 3 .............................
67,980 
67,980 
AF 
Lackland AFB 
Recruit/Family Inprocessing & Info Cen-
ter.
21,800 
21,800 
AF 
Laughlin AFB 
Community Event Complex .......................
0 
0 
AF 
Randolph AFB 
Fire Crash Rescue Station .........................
0 
0 
Utah 
AF 
Hill AFB 
Consolidated 
Transportation 
Facilities, 
Phase I.
0 
0 
AF 
Hill AFB 
F–22 T–10 Engine Test Cell ......................
2,800 
2,800 
AF 
Hill AFB 
F–35 Add/Alt Building 118 for Flight 
Simulator.
0 
3,600 
AF 
Hill AFB 
F–35 Add/Alt Hangar 45W/AMU ...............
0 
6,500 
AF 
Hill AFB 
F–35A Modular Storage Magazine ............
0 
2,000 
Virginia 
AF 
Langley AFB 
F–22 Add/Alter Hangar Bay Lo/Cr Facil-
ity.
8,800 
8,800 
Washington 
AF 
Fairchild AFB 
Precision Measurement Equipment Lab-
oratory (Pmel) Facility.
0 
0 
AF 
Mcchord AFB 
Chapel Center .............................................
0 
0 
Wyoming 
AF 
Camp Guernsey 
Nuclear/Space Security Tactics Training 
Center.
4,650 
4,650 
Afghanistan 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Consolidated Rigging Facility ....................
9,900 
9,900 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Fighter Hangar ...........................................
16,480 
16,480 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Medevac Ramp Expansion/Fire Station ....
16,580 
16,580 
Bahrain Island 
AF 
SW Asia 
North Apron Expansion .............................
45,000 
45,000 
Germany 
AF 
Kapaun 
Dormitory (128 Rm) ....................................
19,600 
19,600 
AF 
Ramstein AB 
Construct C–130J Flight Simulator Facil-
ity.
8,800 
8,800 
AF 
Ramstein AB 
Deicing Fluid Storage & Dispensing Facil-
ity.
2,754 
2,754 
AF 
Ramstein AB 
Unmanned Aerial System Satellite Com-
munication Relay Pads & Facility.
10,800 
10,800 
AF 
Vilseck 
Air Support Operations Squadron Com-
plex.
12,900 
12,900 
Guam 
AF 
Andersen AFB 
Combat Communications Operations Fa-
cility.
9,200 
9,200 
AF 
Andersen AFB 
Commando Warrior Open Bay Student 
Barracks.
11,800 
11,800 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01036
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4491 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
AF 
Andersen AFB 
Guam Strike Ops Group & Tanker Task 
Force.
9,100 
9,100 
AF 
Andersen AFB 
Guam Strike South Ramp Utilities, Ph 1
12,200 
12,200 
AF 
Andersen AFB 
Red Horse Headquarters/Engineering Fa-
cility.
8,000 
8,000 
Italy 
AF 
Aviano AFB 
Air Support Operations Squadron Facility 
10,200 
10,200 
AF 
Aviano AFB 
Dormitory (144 Rm) ....................................
19,000 
19,000 
Korea 
AF 
Kunsan AFB 
Construct Distributed Mission Training 
Flight Simulator Facility.
7,500 
7,500 
Qatar 
AF 
Al Udeid 
Blatchford-Preston Complex Ph 3 .............
62,300 
62,300 
United Kingdom 
AF 
Royal Air Force 
Mildenhall 
Extend Taxiway Alpha ...............................
15,000 
15,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
F–35 Academic Training Center ................
54,150 
0 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
F–35 Flight Simulator Facility ..................
12,190 
0 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
66,336 
66,336 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction—FY11 ...
18,000 
18,000 
AF 
Various Worldwide 
Locations 
F–35 Squadron Operations Facility ..........
10,260 
0 
Total Military Construction, Air Force 
1,311,385 
1,293,295 
Arizona 
Def-Wide 
Marana 
Special 
Operations 
Forces 
Parachute 
Training Facility.
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Yuma 
Special Operations Forces Military Free 
Fall Simulator.
8,977 
8,977 
California 
Def-Wide 
Point Loma Annex 
Replce Storage Facility, Incr 3 ..................
20,000 
20,000 
Def-Wide 
Point Mugu 
Aircraft Direct Fueling Station ..................
3,100 
3,100 
Colorado 
Def-Wide 
Fort Carson 
Special Operations Forces Tactical Un-
manned Aerial Vehicle Hangar.
3,717 
3,717 
District of Columbia 
Def-Wide 
Bolling AFB 
Replace Parking Structure, Ph 1 ...............
3,000 
3,000 
Florida 
Def-Wide 
Eglin AFB 
Special Operations Forces Ground Sup-
port Battalion Detachment.
6,030 
6,030 
Georgia 
Def-Wide 
Augusta 
National Security Agency/Central Secu-
rity Service Georgia Training Facility.
12,855 
12,855 
Def-Wide 
Fort Benning 
Dexter Elementary School Construct Gym 
2,800 
2,800 
Def-Wide 
Fort Benning 
Special Operations Forces Company Sup-
port Facility.
20,441 
20,441 
Def-Wide 
Fort Benning 
Special Operations Forces Military Work-
ing Dog Kennel Complex.
3,624 
3,624 
Def-Wide 
Fort Stewart 
Health Clinic Addtion/Alteration ...............
35,100 
35,100 
Def-Wide 
Hunter Angs 
Fuel Unload Facility ...................................
2,400 
2,400 
Def-Wide 
Hunter Army Air-
field 
Special Operations Forces Tactical Equip-
ment Maintenance Facility Expansion.
3,318 
3,318 
Hawaii 
Def-Wide 
Hickam AFB 
Alter Fuel Storage Tanks ...........................
8,500 
8,500 
Def-Wide 
Pearl Harbor 
Naval Special Warfare Group 3 Command 
and Operations Facility.
28,804 
28,804 
Idaho 
Def-Wide 
Mountain Home 
AFB 
Replace Fuel Storage Tanks ......................
27,500 
27,500 
Illinois 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01037
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4492 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Def-Wide 
Scott Air Force 
Base 
Field Command Facility Upgrade .............
1,388 
1,388 
Kentucky 
Def-Wide 
Fort Campbell 
Landgraf Hangar Addition, 160th Soar ....
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Fort Campbell 
Special Operations Forces Battalion Ops 
Complex.
38,095 
38,095 
Maryland 
Def-Wide 
Aberdeen Proving 
Ground 
US Army Medical Research Institue of In-
fectious Diseases Replacement, Inc 3.
105,000 
105,000 
Def-Wide 
Andrews AFB 
Replace Fuel Storage & Distribution Fa-
cility.
14,000 
14,000 
Def-Wide 
Bethesda Naval 
Hospital 
National Naval Medical Center Parking 
Expansion.
17,100 
17,100 
Def-Wide 
Bethesda Naval 
Hospital 
Transient Wounded Warrior Lodging .......
62,900 
62,900 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
Consolidated Logistics Facility ..................
23,100 
23,100 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
Information Services Facility Expansion ..
4,300 
4,300 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
National Interagency Biodefense Campus 
Security Fencing and Equipment.
2,700 
2,700 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
Supplemental Water Storage .....................
3,700 
3,700 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
US Army Medical Research Institue of In-
fectious Diseases—Stage I, Inc 5.
17,400 
17,400 
Def-Wide 
Fort Detrick 
Water Treatment Plant Repair & Supple-
ment.
11,900 
11,900 
Def-Wide 
Fort Meade 
North Campus Utility Plant, Incr 1 ..........
219,360 
219,360 
Massachusetts 
Def-Wide 
Hanscom AFB 
Mental Health Clinic Addition ..................
2,900 
2,900 
Mississippi 
Def-Wide 
Stennis Space 
Center 
SOF Western Maneuver Area (Phase II) ..
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Stennis Space 
Center 
SOF Western Maneuver Area (Phase III) 
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Stennis Space 
Center 
Special Operations Forces Land Acquisi-
tion, Ph 3.
0 
0 
New Mexico 
Def-Wide 
Cannon AFB 
Special Operations Forces Add/Alt Simu-
lator Facility for MC–130.
13,287 
13,287 
Def-Wide 
Cannon AFB 
Special Operations Forces Aircraft Park-
ing Apron (MC–130J).
12,636 
12,636 
Def-Wide 
Cannon AFB 
Special Operations Forces C–130 Parking 
Apron Phase I.
26,006 
26,006 
Def-Wide 
Cannon AFB 
Special Operations Forces Hangar/AMU 
(MC–130J).
24,622 
24,622 
Def-Wide 
Cannon AFB 
Special Operations Forces Operations and 
Training Complex.
39,674 
39,674 
Def-Wide 
White Sands 
Health and Dental Clinics .........................
22,900 
22,900 
New York 
Def-Wide 
U.S. Military 
Academy 
West Point MS Add/Alt ..............................
27,960 
27,960 
North Carolina 
Def-Wide 
Camp Lejeune 
Tarawa Terrace I Elementry School Re-
place School.
16,646 
16,646 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Mcnair 
Elementry 
School—Replace 
School.
23,086 
23,086 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Murray 
Elementry 
School—Replace 
School.
22,000 
22,000 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
SOF Baffle Containment for Range 19C ...
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
SOF Medical Support Addition ..................
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces Admin/Com-
pany Operations.
10,347 
10,347 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces C4 Facility ......
41,000 
41,000 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces Joint Intel-
ligence Brigade Facility.
32,000 
32,000 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces Operational 
Communications Facility.
11,000 
11,000 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces Operations Ad-
ditions.
15,795 
15,795 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01038
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4493 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bragg 
Special Operations Forces Operations 
Support Facility.
13,465 
13,465 
Ohio 
Def-Wide 
Columbus 
Replace Public Safety Facility ...................
7,400 
7,400 
Pennsylvania 
Def-Wide 
Def Distribution 
Depot New 
Cumberland 
Replace Headquarters Facility ..................
96,000 
96,000 
Texas 
Def-Wide 
Fort Bliss 
Hospital Replacement, Incr 2 ....................
147,100 
147,100 
Def-Wide 
Lackland AFB 
Ambulatory Care Center, Ph 2 ..................
162,500 
162,500 
Utah 
Def-Wide 
Camp Williams 
Comprehensive National Cybersecurity 
Initiative Data Center Increment 2.
398,358 
398,358 
Virginia 
Def-Wide 
Craney Island 
Replace Fuel Pier ........................................
58,000 
58,000 
Def-Wide 
Fort Belvoir 
Dental Clinic Replacement ........................
6,300 
6,300 
Def-Wide 
Pentagon 
Pentagon Metro & Corridor 8 Screening 
Facility.
6,473 
6,473 
Def-Wide 
Pentagon 
Power Plant Modernization, Ph 3 .............
51,928 
51,928 
Def-Wide 
Pentagon 
Secure 
Access 
Lane-Remote 
Vehicle 
Screening.
4,923 
4,923 
Def-Wide 
Quantico 
New Consolidated Elemetary School .........
47,355 
47,355 
Washington 
Def-Wide 
Fort Lewis 
Preventive Medicine Facility .....................
8,400 
8,400 
Def-Wide 
Fort Lewis 
Special Operations Forces Military Work-
ing Dogs Kennel.
0 
0 
Belgium 
Def-Wide 
Brussels 
NATO Headquarters Facility .....................
31,863 
31,863 
Def-Wide 
Brussels 
Replace Shape Middle School/High School 
67,311 
67,311 
Germany 
Def-Wide 
Katterbach 
Health/Dental Clinic Replacement ............
37,100 
37,100 
Def-Wide 
Panzer Kaserne 
Replace Boeblingen High School ...............
48,968 
48,968 
Def-Wide 
Vilseck 
Health Clinic Add/Alt .................................
34,800 
34,800 
Guam 
Def-Wide 
Agana NAS 
Hospital Replacement, Incr 2 ....................
70,000 
0 
Japan 
Def-Wide 
Kadena AB 
Install Fuel Filters-Separators ..................
3,000 
3,000 
Def-Wide 
Misawa AB 
Hydrant Fuel System .................................
31,000 
31,000 
Korea 
Def-Wide 
Camp Carroll 
Health/Dental Clinic Replacement ............
19,500 
19,500 
Qatar 
Def-Wide 
Al Udeid 
Qatar Warehouse ........................................
1,961 
1,961 
Puerto Rico 
Def-Wide 
Fort Buchanan 
Antilles Elementry School/Intermediate 
School—Replace School.
58,708 
58,708 
United Kingdom 
Def-Wide 
Menwith Hill Sta-
tion 
Menwith Hill Station PSC Construction— 
Generators 10 & 11.
2,000 
2,000 
Def-Wide 
Royal Air Force 
Alconbury 
Alconbury Elementry School Replacement 
30,308 
30,308 
Def-Wide 
Royal Air Force 
Mildenhall 
Replace Hydrant Fuel Distribution Sys-
tem.
15,900 
15,900 
Various Locations 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
General Reduction ......................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Contingency Construction ..........................
10,000 
10,000 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Energy Conservation Investment Pro-
gram.
120,000 
120,000 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (DODEA) .................
79,763 
79,763 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (DSS) .......................
1,988 
1,988 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01039
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4494 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (NSA) .......................
28,239 
28,239 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (SOCOM) .................
30,836 
30,836 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (TMA) ......................
230,300 
230,300 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (Undistributed) .......
54,221 
54,221 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design (WHS) ......................
6,270 
6,270 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design-ECIP ........................
0 
0 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (DODEA) 
13,841 
13,841 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (JCS) .....
8,210 
8,210 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (TMA) ....
4,884 
4,884 
Def-Wide 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (Undis-
tributed).
3,000 
3,000 
Def-Wide 
Various Worldwide 
Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (DLA) ....
5,258 
5,258 
Def-Wide 
Various Worldwide 
Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction (SOCOM) 
7,663 
7,663 
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 
3,118,062 
3,048,062 
Colorado 
Chem Demil 
Pueblo Depot 
Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph 
12.
65,569 
65,569 
Kentucky 
Chem Demil 
Blue Grass Army 
Depot 
Ammunition Demilitarization Ph 11 .........
59,402 
59,402 
Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 
124,971 
124,971 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
NATO 
NATO Security In-
vestment Pro-
gram 
NATO Security Investment Program ........
258,884 
258,884 
Total NATO Security Investment Program 
258,884 
258,884 
Alabama 
Army NG 
Fort Mcclellan 
Live Fire Shoot House ................................
0 
0 
Arizona 
Army NG 
Florence 
Readiness Center ........................................
16,500 
16,500 
Arkansas 
Army NG 
Camp Robinson 
Combined Support Maintenance Shop ......
30,000 
30,000 
Army NG 
Fort Chaffee 
Combined Arms Collective Training Facil-
ity.
19,000 
19,000 
Army NG 
Fort Chaffee 
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point 
Range.
0 
0 
Army NG 
Fort Chaffee 
Live Fire Shoot House ................................
2,500 
2,500 
California 
Army NG 
Camp Roberts 
Combined Arms Collective Training Facil-
ity.
19,000 
19,000 
Colorado 
Army NG 
Colorado Springs 
Readiness Center ........................................
20,000 
20,000 
Army NG 
Fort Carson 
Regional Training Institute .......................
40,000 
40,000 
Army NG 
Gypsum 
High Altitude Army Aviation Training 
Site/Army Aviation Support Facility.
39,000 
39,000 
Army NG 
Watkins 
Parachute Maintenance Facility ................
0 
0 
Army NG 
Windsor 
Readiness Center ........................................
7,500 
7,500 
Connecticut 
Army NG 
Windsor Locks 
Readiness Center (Aviation) ......................
41,000 
41,000 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01040
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4495 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Delaware 
Army NG 
New Castle 
Armed Forces Reserve Center(JFHQ) .......
27,000 
27,000 
Georgia 
Army NG 
Cumming 
Readiness Center ........................................
17,000 
17,000 
Army NG 
Dobbins ARB 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
10,400 
10,400 
Hawaii 
Army NG 
Kalaeloa 
Combined Support Maintenance Shop ......
38,000 
38,000 
Idaho 
Army NG 
Gowen Field 
Barracks (Operational Readiness Train-
ing Complex) Ph1.
17,500 
17,500 
Army NG 
Mountain Home 
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fa-
cility.
6,300 
6,300 
Illinois 
Army NG 
Marseilles TA 
Simulation Center .......................................
0 
0 
Army NG 
Springfield 
Combined Support Maintenance Shop 
Add/Alt.
15,000 
15,000 
Iowa 
Army NG 
Camp Dodge 
Combined Arms Collective Training Facil-
ity.
0 
0 
Kansas 
Army NG 
Topeka Army 
Aviation Sup-
port Facility 
Taxiway, Parking Ramps and Hanger Al-
terations.
0 
0 
Army NG 
Wichita 
Field Maintenance Shop .............................
24,000 
24,000 
Army NG 
Wichita 
Readiness Center ........................................
43,000 
43,000 
Kentucky 
Army NG 
Burlington 
Readiness Center ........................................
19,500 
19,500 
Louisiana 
Army NG 
Fort Polk 
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fa-
cility.
5,500 
5,500 
Army NG 
Minden 
Readiness Center ........................................
28,000 
28,000 
Maryland 
Army NG 
St. Inigoes 
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fa-
cility.
5,500 
5,500 
Massachusetts 
Army NG 
Hanscom AFB 
Armed Forces Reserve Center(JFHQ)Ph2 
23,000 
23,000 
Michigan 
Army NG 
Camp Grayling 
Range 
Barracks Replacement, Phase Ii ................
0 
0 
Army NG 
Camp Grayling 
Range 
Combined Arms Collective Training Facil-
ity.
19,000 
19,000 
Army NG 
Camp Grayling 
Range 
Light Demolition Range .............................
0 
0 
Minnesota 
Army NG 
Arden Hills 
Field Maintenance Shop .............................
29,000 
29,000 
Army NG 
Camp Ripley 
Infantry Squad Battle Course ...................
4,300 
4,300 
Army NG 
Camp Ripley 
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fa-
cility.
4,450 
4,450 
Missouri 
Army NG 
Fort Leonard 
Wood 
Regional Training Institute .......................
0 
0 
Nebraska 
Army NG 
Lincoln 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
3,300 
3,300 
Army NG 
Mead 
Readiness Center ........................................
11,400 
11,400 
Nevada 
Army NG 
Las Vegas 
Cst Ready Building .....................................
0 
0 
Army NG 
Nevada National 
Guard 
Las Vegas Field Maintenance Shop ..........
0 
0 
New Hampshire 
Army NG 
Pembroke 
Barracks Facility (Regional Training In-
stitute).
15,000 
15,000 
Army NG 
Pembroke 
Classroom Facility (Regional Training In-
stitute).
21,000 
21,000 
New Mexico 
Army NG 
Farmington 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
8,500 
8,500 
New York 
Army NG 
Ronkonkoma 
Flightline Rehabilitation ............................
0 
0 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01041
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4496 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
North Carolina 
Army NG 
High Point 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
1,551 
1,551 
Army NG 
Morrisville 
Aasf 1 Fixed Wing Aircraft Hangar 
Annex.
0 
0 
North Dakota 
Army NG 
Camp Grafton 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
11,200 
11,200 
Ohio 
Army NG 
Camp Sherman 
Maintenance Building Add/Alt ..................
0 
0 
Rhode Island 
Army NG 
East Greenwich 
United States Property & Fiscal Office ....
27,000 
27,000 
Army NG 
Middletown 
Readiness Center Add/Alt ..........................
0 
0 
South Dakota 
Army NG 
Watertown 
Readiness Center ........................................
25,000 
25,000 
Texas 
Army NG 
Camp Maxey 
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualifica-
tion Course.
2,500 
2,500 
Army NG 
Camp Swift 
Urban Assault Course ................................
2,600 
2,600 
Washington 
Army NG 
Tacoma 
Combined Support Maintenance Shop ......
25,000 
25,000 
West Virginia 
Army NG 
Moorefield 
Readiness Center ........................................
14,200 
14,200 
Army NG 
Morgantown 
Readiness Center ........................................
21,000 
21,000 
Wisconsin 
Army NG 
Madison 
Aircraft Parking ..........................................
5,700 
5,700 
Army NG 
Wausau 
Field Maintenance Shop .............................
0 
0 
Wyoming 
Army NG 
Laramie 
Field Maintenance Shop .............................
14,400 
14,400 
Guam 
Army NG 
Barrigada 
Combined Support Maint Shop Ph1 ..........
19,000 
19,000 
Puerto Rico 
Army NG 
Camp Santiago 
Live Fire Shoot House ................................
3,100 
3,100 
Army NG 
Camp Santiago 
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range ...........
9,200 
9,200 
Virgin Islands 
Army NG 
St. Croix 
Readiness Center (JFHQ) ..........................
25,000 
25,000 
Unspecified 
Army NG 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army NG 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
25,663 
25,663 
Army NG 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction ................
11,400 
11,400 
Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 
873,664 
873,664 
California 
Army Res 
Fairfield 
Army Reserve Center .................................
26,000 
26,000 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Equipment Concentration Site Tactical 
Equipment Maint Facility.
22,000 
22,000 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Equipment Concentration Site Warehouse 
15,000 
15,000 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Grenade Launcher Range ..........................
1,400 
1,400 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Hand Grenade Familiarization Range 
(Live).
1,400 
1,400 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Light Demolition Range .............................
2,700 
2,700 
Army Res 
Fort Hunter 
Liggett 
Tactical Vehicle Wash Rack .......................
9,500 
9,500 
Florida 
Army Res 
North Fort Myers 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
13,800 
13,800 
Army Res 
Orlando 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
10,200 
10,200 
Army Res 
Tallahassee 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
10,400 
10,400 
Georgia 
Army Res 
Macon 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
11,400 
11,400 
Illinois 
Army Res 
Quincy 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
12,200 
12,200 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01042
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4497 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Army Res 
Rockford Usarc 
Army Reserve Center .................................
0 
0 
Indiana 
Army Res 
Michigan City 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
15,500 
15,500 
Iowa 
Army Res 
Des Moines 
Army Reserve Center .................................
8,175 
8,175 
Massachusetts 
Army Res 
Devens Reserve 
Forces Training 
Area 
Automated Record Fire Range ...................
4,700 
4,700 
Missouri 
Army Res 
Belton 
Army Reserve Center .................................
11,800 
11,800 
New Jersey 
Army Res 
Fort Dix 
Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 
Range.
0 
0 
New Mexico 
Army Res 
Las Cruces 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
11,400 
11,400 
New York 
Army Res 
Binghamton 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
13,400 
13,400 
Texas 
Army Res 
Denton 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
12,600 
12,600 
Army Res 
Fort Hood 
Army Reserve Center .................................
0 
0 
Army Res 
Rio Grande 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
6,100 
6,100 
Army Res 
San Marcos 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
8,500 
8,500 
Virginia 
Army Res 
Fort A.P. Hill 
Army Reserve Center .................................
15,500 
15,500 
Army Res 
Fort Story 
Army Reserve Center .................................
11,000 
11,000 
Army Res 
Roanoke 
Army Reserve Center/Land ........................
14,800 
14,800 
Wisconsin 
Army Res 
Fort Mccoy 
AT/MOB Billeting Complex, Ph 1 .............
9,800 
9,800 
Army Res 
Fort Mccoy 
Nco Academy, Ph 2 .....................................
10,000 
10,000 
Unspecified 
Army Res 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army Res 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design ..................................
25,900 
25,900 
Army Res 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction ................
3,000 
3,000 
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 
318,175 
318,175 
California 
N/MC Res 
Twentynine Palms 
Tank Vehicle Maintenance Facility ...........
5,991 
5,991 
Louisiana 
N/MC Res 
New Orleans 
Joint Air Traffic Control Facility ...............
16,281 
16,281 
Virginia 
N/MC Res 
Williamsburg 
Navy Ordnance Cargo Logistics Training 
Camp.
21,346 
21,346 
Washington 
N/MC Res 
Yakima 
Marine Corps Reserve Center ....................
13,844 
13,844 
Unspecified 
N/MC Res 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
N/MC Res 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
N/MC Res 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Mcnr Unspecified Minor Construction ......
2,238 
2,238 
N/MC Res 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design ..................................
1,857 
1,857 
Total Military Construction, Naval Reserve 
61,557 
61,557 
Alabama 
Air NG 
Montgomery Re-
gional Airport 
(ANG) Base 
Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hangar ..
7,472 
7,472 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01043
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4498 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Air NG 
Montgomery Re-
gional Airport 
(ANG) Base 
Replace Squad Ops Facility .......................
0 
0 
Alaska 
Air NG 
Eielson AFB 
Add/Alter Communications Facility ..........
0 
0 
Arizona 
Air NG 
Davis Monthan 
AFB 
TFI—Predator FOC—Increased Mission 
Orbit Tasking.
4,650 
4,650 
Air NG 
Fort Huachuca 
Total Force Integration—Predator Launch 
and Recovery Element Beddown.
0 
11,000 
Arkansas 
Air NG 
Little Rock AFB 
Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hangar ..
0 
0 
Colorado 
Air NG 
Buckely AFB 
Taxiway Juliet and Lima ...........................
0 
0 
Delaware 
Air NG 
New Castle Coun-
ty Airport 
C–130 
Aircraft 
Maintenance 
Shops 
(Phase III).
0 
0 
Air NG 
New Castle Coun-
ty Airport 
Joint 
Forces 
Operations 
Center-ANG 
Share.
1,500 
1,500 
Florida 
Air NG 
Jacksonville IAP 
Security Forces Training Facility ..............
6,700 
6,700 
Georgia 
Air NG 
Savannah/Hilton 
Head IAP 
Relocate Air Supt Opers Sqdn (Asos) Fac 
7,450 
7,450 
Hawaii 
Air NG 
Hickam AFB 
F–22 Beddown Intrastructure Support .....
5,950 
5,950 
Air NG 
Hickam AFB 
F–22 Hangar, Squadron Operations and 
AMU.
48,250 
48,250 
Air NG 
Hickam AFB 
F–22 Upgrade Munitions Complex ............
17,250 
17,250 
Illinois 
Air NG 
Capital Map 
CNAF Beddown-Upgrade Facilities ..........
16,700 
16,700 
Indiana 
Air NG 
Hulman Regional 
Airport 
Asos Beddown-Upgrade Facilities .............
4,100 
4,100 
Iowa 
Air NG 
Des Moines 
Corrosion Control Hangar ..........................
0 
0 
Air NG 
Des Moines IAP 
Corrosion Control Hangar ..........................
0 
0 
Maryland 
Air NG 
Martin State Air-
port 
Replace Ops and Medical Training Facil-
ity.
11,400 
11,400 
Massachusetts 
Air NG 
Barnes ANGB 
Add to Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .......
0 
0 
Air NG 
Barnes Municipal 
Airport 
Additions and Renovations to Building 15 
0 
0 
Michigan 
Air NG 
Alpena Combat 
Readiness 
Training Center 
Replace Troop Quarters, Phase II .............
0 
0 
Minnesota 
Air NG 
Duluth 
Load Crew Training and Weapon Release 
Shops.
0 
0 
New Jersey 
Air NG 
177th Fighter 
Wing, Atlantic 
City 
Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hanger ..
0 
0 
Air NG 
Atlantic City IAP 
Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hangar ..
0 
0 
New York 
Air NG 
Fort Drum 
Reaper Infrastructure Support ..................
2,500 
2,500 
Air NG 
Stewart IAP 
Aircraft Conversion Facility .......................
0 
0 
Air NG 
Stewart IAP 
Base Defense Group Beddown ...................
14,250 
14,250 
North Carolina 
Air NG 
Stanly County Air-
port 
Upgrade Asos Facilities ..............................
2,000 
2,000 
Ohio 
Air NG 
Toledo Express 
Airport 
Replace Security Forces Complex ..............
0 
0 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01044
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4499 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Air NG 
Toledo Express 
Airport 
Replace Security Forces Complex ..............
0 
0 
Oregon 
Air NG 
Kingsley Field 
ANG Base 
Replace Fire Station ...................................
0 
0 
Pennsylvania 
Air NG 
State College Angs 
Add to and Alter AOS Facility ..................
4,100 
4,100 
Rhode Island 
Air NG 
Quonset State Air-
port 
C–130 Parking Apron .................................
0 
0 
South Carolina 
Air NG 
Mcentire 
Training/Operations Center .......................
0 
0 
Air NG 
Mcentire Joint Na-
tional Guard 
Base 
Replace Operations and Training ..............
0 
0 
South Dakota 
Air NG 
Joe Foss Field 
Aircraft Maintenance Shops ......................
0 
0 
Tennessee 
Air NG 
Mcghee Tyson 
ANG Base 
Hobbs Road Acquisition .............................
0 
0 
Air NG 
Nashville IAP 
Renovate Intel Squadron Facilities ...........
5,500 
5,500 
Texas 
Air NG 
Ellington Field 
Upgrade Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Main-
tenance Hangar.
0 
7,000 
Vermont 
Air NG 
Burlington Inter-
national Airport 
Upgrade Taxiways and Replace Arm/Dis-
arm Pads.
0 
0 
West Virginia 
Air NG 
Yeager AFB 
Communications Training Fac. .................
0 
0 
Air NG 
Yeager AFB 
Force Protection/Antiterrorism ..................
0 
0 
Wisconsin 
Air NG 
General Mitchell 
International 
Airport 
Replace Fire Station ...................................
0 
0 
Unspecified 
Air NG 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Air NG 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Minor Construction .....................................
8,000 
8,000 
Air NG 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
9,214 
9,214 
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 
176,986 
194,986 
Florida 
AF Res 
Patrick AFB 
Weapons Maintenance Facility ..................
3,420 
3,420 
New York 
AF Res 
Niagara ARS 
C–130 Flightline Operations Facility, Ph 
1.
0 
0 
Unspecified 
AF Res 
Varlocs 
Varlocs .........................................................
0 
0 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
AF Res 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning and Design ..................................
1,653 
1,653 
AF Res 
Various Worldwide 
Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction ................
2,759 
2,759 
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 
7,832 
7,832 
Alaska 
FH Con Army 
Fort Wainwright 
Family Housing Replacement Constrution 
(110 Units).
21,000 
21,000 
Germany 
FH Con Army 
Baumholder 
Family Housing Replacement Construc-
tion (64 Units).
34,329 
34,329 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01045
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4500 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Construction Improvements (235 Units) ...
35,000 
35,000 
FH Con Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Family Housing Planning & Design .........
2,040 
2,040 
Total, Family Housing Construction, Army 
92,369 
92,369 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing ........................................................
203,184 
203,184 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance of Real Property ...................
120,899 
120,899 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
1,201 
1,201 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Operations ...................................................
96,142 
96,142 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Privatization Support Costs .......................
27,059 
27,059 
FH Ops Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Utilities Account .........................................
69,655 
69,655 
Total, Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army 
518,140 
518,140 
Guantanamo Bay, 
Cuba 
FH Con Navy 
Guantanamo Bay 
Replace GTMO Housing .............................
37,169 
37,169 
Total, Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps 
37,169 
37,169 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Classified Project ........................................
50 
0 
FH Con AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Construction Improvments ........................
73,750 
73,800 
Total, Family Housing Construction, Air Force 
73,800 
73,800 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Design ..........................................................
3,255 
3,255 
FH Con Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Improvements .............................................
146,020 
146,020 
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps 
149,275 
149,275 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Con AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
4,225 
4,225 
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 
4,225 
4,225 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Furnishings Account ...................................
14,478 
14,478 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing ........................................................
97,484 
97,484 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance of Real Property ...................
87,134 
87,134 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Management Account .................................
63,551 
63,551 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01046
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4501 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
464 
464 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Privatization Support Costs .......................
26,526 
26,526 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Services Account .........................................
16,790 
16,790 
FH Ops Navy 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Utilities Account .........................................
59,919 
59,919 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine 
Corps 
366,346 
366,346 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Furnishings Account ...................................
35,399 
35,399 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Housing Privatization .................................
53,903 
53,903 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing ........................................................
95,143 
95,143 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing Account ..........................................
528 
528 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance ................................................
159,725 
159,725 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance Account .................................
1,971 
1,971 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Management Account .................................
1,561 
1,561 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Management Account .................................
54,633 
54,633 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Miscellaneous Account ...............................
1,710 
1,710 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Services Account .........................................
19,974 
19,974 
FH Ops AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Utilities Account .........................................
89,245 
89,245 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force 
513,792 
513,792 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Furnishings Account ...................................
4,501 
4,501 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Furnishings Account ...................................
18 
18 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing ........................................................
10,293 
10,293 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Leasing ........................................................
34,124 
34,124 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance of Real Property ...................
707 
707 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Maintenance of Real Property ...................
70 
70 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Management Account .................................
365 
365 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Operations ...................................................
50 
50 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Services Account .........................................
29 
29 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Utilities Account .........................................
10 
10 
FH Ops DW 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Utilities Account .........................................
297 
297 
Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide 
50,464 
50,464 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01047
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4502 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
HOAP 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Homeowers Assistance Program ...............
16,515 
16,515 
Total Homeowners Assistance Fund 
16,515 
16,515 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
FHIF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Family Housing Improvement Fund .........
1,096 
1,096 
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 
1,096 
1,096 
Maryland 
BRAC 05 
Bethesda 
(Wrnmmc) 
Defense Access Roads—Medical Center 
Entrance.
20,000 
20,000 
BRAC 05 
Bethesda 
(Wrnmmc) 
Traffic Mitigation, Incr 2 ...........................
7,600 
7,600 
Texas 
BRAC 05 
Fort Sam Houston 
San Antonio Military Medical Center 
(North), Incr 4.
93,941 
93,941 
Virginia 
BRAC 05 
Fort Belvoir 
Hospital Replacement, Incr 5 ....................
63,637 
63,637 
BRAC 05 
Fort Belvoir 
NGA Headquarters Facility .......................
83,328 
83,328 
BRAC 05 
Fort Belvoir 
Office Complex, Incr 4 ................................
5,610 
5,610 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC 05 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Rescission ....................................................
0 
0 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Environmental ............................................
19,555 
19,555 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Environmental ............................................
73,511 
73,511 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Environmental ............................................
15,201 
15,201 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Military Personnel Permanent Change of 
Station.
1,456 
1,456 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Military Personnel Permanent Change of 
Station.
1,277 
1,277 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Operation and Maintenance ......................
476,764 
476,764 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Operation and Maintenance ......................
99,570 
99,570 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Operation and Maintenance ......................
887,231 
887,231 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Operation and Maintenance ......................
321,888 
321,888 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Other ............................................................
121,584 
121,584 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Other ............................................................
3,601 
3,601 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Other ............................................................
6,853 
6,853 
BRAC 05 
Various 
Other ............................................................
51,678 
51,678 
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 2005 
2,354,285 
2,354,285 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, Air 
Force 
Base Realignment & Closure .....................
124,874 
124,874 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, Army 
Base Realignment & Closure .....................
73,600 
73,600 
BRAC IV 
Base Realignment 
& Closure, Navy 
Base Realignment & Closure .....................
162,000 
162,000 
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 1990 
360,474 
360,474 
Unspecified 
GR 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
General Reductions .....................................
0 
0 
Total General Reductions 
0 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01048
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4503 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3001. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Total Military Construction 
18,747,368 
18,190,547 
SEC. 3002. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS 
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 
SEC. 3002. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Afghanistan 
Army 
Airborne 
Rotary Wing Parking ..................................
1,200 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Army Aviation HQ Facilities .....................
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Barracks ......................................................
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Command & Control Facility .....................
13,600 
13,600 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Consolidated Community Support Area ...
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Consolidated Laboratory ............................
0 
13,800 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Counter-Improvised 
Explosive 
Device 
Task Force Compound.
24,000 
24,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Detention Facility in Parwan Detainee 
Housing.
23,000 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Dining Facility ............................................
2,650 
6,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Eastside Electrical Distribution ................
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Eastside Utilities Infrastructure ...............
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Entry Control Point ....................................
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Joint Defense Operations Center ..............
0 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Military Police HQ ......................................
2,800 
5,500 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Replace Temporary Guard Towers ............
5,500 
5,500 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Role III Hospital .........................................
35,000 
42,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Tanker Truck Off-Load Facility .................
5,700 
0 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Task Force Freedom Compound ................
18,000 
18,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Troop Housing, Ph 4 ...................................
23,000 
23,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Troop Housing, Ph 5 ...................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Troop Housing, Ph 6 ...................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Troop Housing, Ph 7 ...................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Troop Housing, Ph 8 ...................................
29,000 
29,000 
Army 
Bagram AFB 
Vet Clinic & Kennel ....................................
2,600 
2,600 
Army 
Delaram Ii 
Entry Control Point and Access Roads .....
0 
4,400 
Army 
Dwyer 
Dining Facility ............................................
6,000 
9,000 
Army 
Dwyer 
Entry Control Point ....................................
5,100 
5,100 
Army 
Dwyer 
Rotary Wing Apron .....................................
44,000 
44,000 
Army 
Dwyer 
Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
16,000 
16,000 
Army 
Frontenac 
Waste Management Complex ....................
4,200 
4,200 
Army 
Frontenac 
Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
4,200 
4,200 
Army 
Jalalabad 
Rotary Wing Parking ..................................
1,100 
0 
Army 
Kandahar 
Command & Control Facility .....................
5,200 
5,200 
Army 
Kandahar 
North Area Utilities, Ph 2 ..........................
21,000 
26,000 
Army 
Kandahar 
Special Operations Forces Joint Oper-
ations Center.
6,000 
9,200 
Army 
Kandahar 
Troop Housing, Ph 4 ...................................
20,000 
20,000 
Army 
Kandahar 
Troop Housing, Ph 5 ...................................
20,000 
20,000 
Army 
Kandahar 
Troop Housing, Ph 6 ...................................
20,000 
0 
Army 
Kandahar 
Troop Housing, Ph 7 ...................................
20,000 
0 
Army 
Maywand 
Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
7,000 
7,000 
Army 
Shank 
Ammunition Supply Point ..........................
25,000 
23,000 
Army 
Shank 
Electrical Utility Systems, Ph 2 ................
0 
6,400 
Army 
Shank 
Expand 
Extended 
Cooperation 
Pro-
gramme 1 and Extended Cooperation 
Programme 2.
16,000 
16,000 
Army 
Shank 
Guard Towers ..............................................
2,400 
5,200 
Army 
Shank 
Roads and Utilities, Ph 1 ...........................
8,000 
25,000 
Army 
Shank 
Special Operations Forces Parking Apron 
0 
15,000 
Army 
Shank 
Wastewater Treatment Plant ....................
0 
7,700 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01049
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4504 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3002. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
Army 
Sharana 
Bulk Materials Transfer Station ...............
12,400 
12,400 
Army 
Shindand 
Medical Facility ...........................................
7,700 
0 
Army 
Shindand 
Waste Management Complex ....................
0 
6,100 
Army 
Tarin Kowt 
Medical Facility ...........................................
5,500 
0 
Army 
Tarin Kowt 
Rotary Wing Parking and Taxiway, Ph 2
24,000 
24,000 
Army 
Tarin Kowt 
Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
4,200 
5,600 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Command & Control HQ ............................
0 
13,600 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Contingency Housing ..................................
41,000 
0 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Dining Facility ............................................
12,800 
27,000 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Paved Roads ................................................
0 
9,800 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Rotary Wing Parking ..................................
35,000 
35,000 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Waste Management Complex Expansion ..
0 
14,200 
Army 
Tombstone/Bastion Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
13,000 
13,000 
Army 
Various Locations 
Air Pollution Abatement ............................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Community Facilities .................................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Hospital and Medical Facilities .................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Operational Facilities .................................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Route Gypsum, Ph 1 ...................................
40,000 
50,000 
Army 
Various Locations 
Route Gypsum, Ph 2 ...................................
0 
50,000 
Army 
Various Locations 
Supply Facilities .........................................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Supporting Activities ..................................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Troop Housing Facilities ............................
0 
0 
Army 
Various Locations 
Utility Facilities ..........................................
0 
0 
Army 
Wolverine 
Perimeter Fence ..........................................
5,100 
0 
Army 
Wolverine 
Rotary Wing Apron .....................................
24,000 
0 
Army 
Wolverine 
Wastewater Treatment Facility .................
13,000 
13,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Minor Construction .....................................
78,330 
78,330 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
89,716 
79,716 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Rescission (Public Law 111–117) ...............
0 
0 
Army 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Transfer to DOD Inspector General ..........
0 
7,000 
Total Military Construction, Army 
929,996 
981,346 
Bahrain Island 
Navy 
Sw Asia 
Navy 
Central 
Command 
Ammunition 
Magazines.
0 
0 
Navy 
Sw Asia 
Operations & Support Facilities ................
0 
0 
Djibouti 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
General Warehouse ....................................
0 
0 
Navy 
Camp Lemonier 
Pave External Roads ..................................
0 
0 
Total Military Construction, Navy 
0 
Afghanistan 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Consolidated Rigging Facility ....................
0 
0 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Fighter Hanger ...........................................
0 
0 
AF 
Bagram AFB 
Medevac Ramp Expansion/Fire Station ....
0 
0 
AF 
Kandahar 
Expand Cargo Handling Area ....................
7,100 
0 
AF 
Kandahar 
Expeditionary Airlift Shelter .....................
7,400 
0 
AF 
Sharana 
Runway ........................................................
35,000 
0 
AF 
Shindand 
Passenger & Cargo Terminal .....................
15,800 
0 
AF 
Tombstone/Bastion Expand Fuels Operations and Storage .....
2,500 
0 
AF 
Tombstone/Bastion Parallel Taxiway .........................................
86,000 
0 
AF 
Tombstone/Bastion Refueler Apron ............................................
55,000 
0 
AF 
Various Locations 
Maintenance and Production Facilities ....
0 
0 
AF 
Various Locations 
Operational Facilities .................................
0 
0 
AF 
Various Locations 
Supply Facilities .........................................
0 
0 
AF 
Warrior 
Runway ........................................................
8,700 
0 
Bahrain Island 
AF 
Sw Asia 
North Apron Expansion .............................
0 
0 
Oman 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01050
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4505 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3002. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 
(In Thousands of Dollars) 
Account 
State/Country and 
Installation 
Project Title 
Budget 
Request 
Agreement 
AF 
AL Musannah 
Airlift Ramp & Fuel Facilities ...................
0 
69,000 
Qatar 
AF 
AL Udeid 
Blatchford-Preston Complex, Ph 3 ............
0 
0 
AF 
AL Udeid 
Tactical Ramp/Vehicle Maintenance Facil-
ity.
0 
63,000 
Worldwide Unspec-
ified 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Planning & Design ......................................
13,422 
13,422 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Rescission (Public Law 111–117) ...............
0 
0 
AF 
Unspecified World-
wide Locations 
Unspecified Minor Construction—FY11 
OCO.
49,584 
49,584 
Total Military Construction, Air Force 
280,506 
195,006 
Conus Classified 
Def-Wide 
Classified Location Classified Project ........................................
41,900 
41,900 
Def-Wide 
Worldwide Un-
specified 
Planning and Design ..................................
4,600 
4,600 
Qatar 
Def-Wide 
AL Udeid 
Qatar Warehouse ........................................
0 
0 
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 
46,500 
46,500 
Total Military Construction 
1,257,002 
1,222,852 
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
NATIONAL 
SECURITY 
AUTHORIZA-
TIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 
NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 
Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance. 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 
Sec. 3111. Aircraft procurement. 
Sec. 3112. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear secu-
rity complex. 
Sec. 3113. Comptroller General assessment of adequacy of budget requests with re-
spect to the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons 
stockpile. 
Sec. 3114. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects. 
Sec. 3115. Establishment of cooperative research and development centers. 
Sec. 3116. Future-years defense environmental management plan. 
Sec. 3117. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy for appointment of certain 
scientific, engineering, and technical personnel. 
Sec. 3118. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 
to carry out certain research projects. 
Sec. 3119. Extension of authority relating to the International Materials Protection, 
Control, and Accounting Program of the Department of Energy. 
Sec. 3120. Extension of deadline for transfer of parcels of land to be conveyed to 
Los Alamos County, New Mexico, and held in trust for the Pueblo of 
San Ildefonso. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01051
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6582
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4506 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Sec. 3121. Repeal of sunset provision for modification of minor construction thresh-
old for plant projects. 
Sec. 3122. Enhancing private-sector employment through cooperative research and 
development activities. 
Sec. 3123. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in 
countries outside of the former Soviet Union. 
Sec. 3124.
Department of Energy energy parks program. 
Subtitle C—Reports 
Sec. 3131. Report on graded security protection policy. 
Subtitle A—National Security Programs 
Authorizations 
SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 
(a) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby 
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for 
fiscal year 2011 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security 
Administration in carrying out programs necessary for national 
security in the amount of $11,214,755,000, to be allocated as follows: 
(1) For weapons activities, $7,028,835,000. 
(2) 
For 
defense 
nuclear 
nonproliferation 
activities, 
$2,667,167,000. 
(3) For naval reactors, $1,070,486,000. 
(4) For the Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security, 
$448,267,000. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION
OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.—From funds 
referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out 
plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant 
projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: 
(1) Project 11–D–801, reinvestment project phase 2, Los 
Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 
$20,000,000. 
(2) Project 11–D–601, sanitary effluent reclamation facility 
expansion, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New 
Mexico, $15,000,000. 
SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for defense environmental 
cleanup activities in carrying out programs necessary for national 
security in the amount of $5,588,039,000. 
SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for other defense activities 
in carrying out programs necessary for national security in the 
amount of $878,209,000. 
SEC. 3104. ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Depart-
ment of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for energy security and assur-
ance programs necessary for national security in the amount of 
$6,188,000. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01052
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4507 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, 
Restrictions, and Limitations 
SEC. 3111. AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT. 
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated and made avail-
able for obligation under section 3101(1) for weapons activities 
for any fiscal year before fiscal year 2012, the Secretary of Energy 
may procure not more than two aircraft. 
SEC. 3112. BIENNIAL PLAN ON MODERNIZATION AND REFURBISHMENT 
OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY COMPLEX. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by inserting after 
section 4203 the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 4203A. BIENNIAL PLAN ON MODERNIZATION AND REFURBISH-
MENT OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY COMPLEX. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In each even-numbered year, beginning in 
2012, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall include in the 
plan for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile required by 
section 4203 a plan for the modernization and refurbishment of 
the nuclear security complex. 
‘‘(b) PLAN DESIGN.— 
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall 
be designed to ensure that the nuclear security complex is 
capable of supporting the following: 
‘‘(A) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the national 
security strategy of the United States as set forth in the 
most recent national security strategy report of the Presi-
dent under section 108 of the National Security Act of 
1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a). 
‘‘(B) The nuclear posture of the United States as set 
forth in the most recent Nuclear Posture Review. 
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—If, at the time the plan is submitted 
under subsection (a), a national security strategy report has 
not been submitted to Congress under section 108 of the 
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a), the plan 
required by subsection (a) shall be designed to ensure that 
the nuclear security complex is capable of supporting the 
national defense strategy recommended in the report of the 
most recent Quadrennial Defense Review. 
‘‘(c) PLAN ELEMENTS.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
‘‘(1) A description of the modernization and refurbishment 
measures the Administrator determines necessary to meet the 
requirements of— 
‘‘(A) the national security strategy of the United States 
as set forth in the most recent national security strategy 
report of the President under section 108 of the National 
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a) or the national 
defense strategy recommended in the report of the most 
recent Quadrennial Defense Review, as applicable under 
subsection (b); and 
‘‘(B) the Nuclear Posture Review. 
‘‘(2) A schedule for implementing the measures described 
in paragraph (1) during the ten years following the date on 
Effective date. 
50 USC 2523a. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01053
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4508 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
which the plan for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile 
required by section 4203 and into which the plan required 
by subsection (a) is incorporated is submitted to Congress under 
section 4203(c). 
‘‘(3) Consistent with the budget justification materials sub-
mitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy 
budget for the fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of 
the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States 
Code), an estimate of the annual funds the Administrator deter-
mines necessary to carry out the plan required by subsection 
(a), including a discussion of the criteria, evidence, and strate-
gies on which the estimate is based. 
‘‘(d) FORM.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
‘‘(e) NUCLEAR WEAPONS COUNCIL ASSESSMENT.— 
‘‘(1) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—For each plan required by 
subsection (a), the Nuclear Weapons Council established by 
section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall conduct an 
assessment that includes the following: 
‘‘(A) An analysis of the plan, including— 
‘‘(i) whether the plan supports the requirements 
of the national security strategy of the United States 
or the most recent Quadrennial Defense Review, which-
ever is applicable under subsection (b), and the Nuclear 
Posture Review; and 
‘‘(ii) whether the modernization and refurbishment 
measures described under paragraph (1) of subsection 
(c) and the schedule described under paragraph (2) 
of such subsection are adequate to support such 
requirements. 
‘‘(B) An analysis of whether the plan adequately 
addresses the requirements for infrastructure recapitaliza-
tion of the facilities of the nuclear security complex. 
‘‘(C) If the Nuclear Weapons Council determines that 
the plan does not adequately support modernization and 
refurbishment requirements under subparagraph (A) or the 
nuclear security complex facilities infrastructure recapital-
ization requirements under subparagraph (B), a risk 
assessment with respect to— 
‘‘(i) supporting the annual certification of the 
nuclear weapons stockpile under section 4203; and 
‘‘(ii) maintaining the long-term safety, security, 
and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile. 
‘‘(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 
date on which the Administrator submits the plan required 
by subsection (a), the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit 
to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the 
assessment required under paragraph (1). 
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘nuclear security complex’ means the physical 
facilities, technology, and human capital of the following: 
‘‘(A) The national security laboratories (as defined in 
section 3281 of the National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion Act (50 U.S.C. 2471)). 
‘‘(B) The Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri. 
‘‘(C) The Nevada Test Site, Nevada. 
‘‘(D) The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01054
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4509 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(E) The Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee. 
‘‘(F) The Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘Quadrennial Defense Review’ means the 
review of the defense programs and policies of the United 
States that is carried out every four years under section 118 
of title 10, United States Code.’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 
Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 4203 the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 4203A. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear se-
curity complex.’’. 
SEC. 3113. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF ADEQUACY OF 
BUDGET REQUESTS WITH RESPECT TO THE MODERNIZA-
TION AND REFURBISHMENT OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
STOCKPILE. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3255 of the National Nuclear Security 
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2455) is amended to read as follows: 
‘‘SEC. 3255. COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF ADEQUACY OF 
BUDGET REQUESTS WITH RESPECT TO THE MODERNIZA-
TION AND REFURBISHMENT OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
STOCKPILE. 
‘‘(a) GAO STUDY AND REPORTS.—(1) For the nuclear security 
budget materials submitted in each fiscal year by the Administrator, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study 
on whether both the budget for the fiscal year following the fiscal 
year in which such budget materials are submitted and the future- 
years nuclear security program submitted to Congress in relation 
to such budget under section 3253 provide for funding of the nuclear 
security complex at a level that is sufficient for the modernization 
and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex. 
‘‘(2) Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Adminis-
trator submits the nuclear security budget materials, the Comp-
troller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report on the study under paragraph (1), including— 
‘‘(A) the findings of such study; and 
‘‘(B) whether the nuclear security budget materials support 
the requirements for infrastructure recapitalization of the facili-
ties of the nuclear security complex. 
‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 
‘‘(1) The term ‘budget’ means the budget for a fiscal year 
that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. 
‘‘(2) The term ‘nuclear security budget materials’ means 
the materials submitted to Congress by the Administrator in 
support of the budget for a fiscal year. 
‘‘(3) The term ‘nuclear security complex’ means the physical 
facilities, technology, and human capital of the following: 
‘‘(A) The national security laboratories. 
‘‘(B) The Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri. 
‘‘(C) The Nevada Test Site, Nevada. 
‘‘(D) The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina. 
‘‘(E) The Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee. 
‘‘(F) The Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas.’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01055
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4510 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 
National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by 
striking the item relating to section 3255 and inserting the following 
new item: 
‘‘Sec. 3255. Comptroller General assessment of adequacy of budget requests with 
respect to the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear weapons 
stockpile.’’. 
SEC. 3114. NOTIFICATION OF COST OVERRUNS FOR CERTAIN DEPART-
MENT OF ENERGY PROJECTS. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 4713. NOTIFICATION OF COST OVERRUNS FOR CERTAIN DEPART-
MENT OF ENERGY PROJECTS. 
‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF COST AND SCHEDULE BASELINES.— 
‘‘(1) STOCKPILE LIFE EXTENSION PROJECTS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Secu-
rity shall establish a cost and schedule baseline for each 
nuclear stockpile life extension project of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration. 
‘‘(B) PER
UNIT
COST.—The cost baseline developed 
under subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to each 
life extension project, an estimated cost for each warhead 
in the project. 
‘‘(C) 
NOTIFICATION
TO
CONGRESSIONAL
DEFENSE 
COMMITTEES.—Not later than 30 days after establishing 
a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A), the 
Administrator shall submit the cost and schedule baseline 
to the congressional defense committees. 
‘‘(2) DEFENSE-FUNDED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy shall estab-
lish a cost and schedule baseline under the project manage-
ment protocols of the Department of Energy for each 
construction project that is— 
‘‘(i) in excess of $50,000,000; and 
‘‘(ii) carried out by the Department using funds 
authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year pursuant 
to a DOE national security authorization. 
‘‘(B) 
NOTIFICATION
TO
CONGRESSIONAL
DEFENSE 
COMMITTEES.—Not later than 30 days after establishing 
a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A), the 
Secretary shall submit the cost and schedule baseline to 
the congressional defense committees. 
‘‘(3) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECTS.— 
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a cost 
and schedule baseline under the project management proto-
cols of the Department of Energy for each defense environ-
mental management project that is— 
‘‘(i) in excess of $50,000,000; and 
‘‘(ii) carried out by the Department pursuant to 
such protocols. 
‘‘(B) 
NOTIFICATION
TO
CONGRESSIONAL
DEFENSE 
COMMITTEES.—Not later than 30 days after establishing 
a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A), the 
Deadlines. 
50 USC 2753. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01056
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4511 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
Secretary shall submit the cost and schedule baseline to 
the congressional defense committees. 
‘‘(b) NOTIFICATION
OF
COSTS
EXCEEDING
BASELINE.—The 
Administrator or the Secretary, as applicable, shall notify the 
congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after deter-
mining that— 
‘‘(1) the total cost for a project referred to in paragraph 
(1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) will exceed an amount that 
is equal to 125 percent of the cost baseline established under 
subsection (a) for that project; and 
‘‘(2) in the case of a stockpile life extension project referred 
to in subsection (a)(1), the cost for any warhead in the project 
will exceed an amount that is equal to 200 percent of the 
cost baseline established under subsection (a)(1)(B) for each 
warhead in that project. 
‘‘(c) NOTIFICATION OF DETERMINATION WITH RESPECT TO TERMI-
NATION OR CONTINUATION OF PROJECTS.—Not later than 90 days 
after submitting a notification under subsection (b) with respect 
to a project, the Administrator or the Secretary, as applicable, 
shall— 
‘‘(1) notify the congressional defense committees with 
respect to whether the project will be terminated or continued; 
and 
‘‘(2) if the project will be continued, certify to the congres-
sional defense committees that— 
‘‘(A) a revised cost and schedule baseline has been 
established for the project and, in the case of a stockpile 
life extension project referred to in subparagraph (A) or 
(B) of subsection (a)(1), a revised estimate of the cost for 
each warhead in the project has been made; 
‘‘(B) the continuation of the project is necessary to 
the mission of the Department of Energy and there is 
no alternative to the project that would meet the require-
ments of that mission; and 
‘‘(C) a management structure is in place adequate to 
manage and control the cost and schedule of the project. 
‘‘(d) APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS TO REVISED COST AND 
SCHEDULE BASELINES.—A revised cost and schedule baseline estab-
lished under subsection (c) shall— 
‘‘(1) be submitted to the congressional defense committees 
with the certification submitted under subsection (c)(2); and 
‘‘(2) be subject to the notification requirements of sub-
sections (b) and (c) in the same manner and to the same 
extent as a cost and schedule baseline established under sub-
section (a).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 
Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 4712 the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 4713. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy 
projects.’’. 
SEC. 
3115. 
ESTABLISHMENT 
OF 
COOPERATIVE 
RESEARCH 
AND 
DEVELOPMENT CENTERS. 
(a) COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.— 
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Section 4813 of the Atomic Energy 
Defense Act (division D of Public Law 107–314; 50 U.S.C. 
2794) is amended— 
Certification. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01057
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4512 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); 
and 
(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
subsection (b): 
‘‘(b) COOPERATIVE RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.— 
(1) Subject to the availability of appropriations provided for such 
purpose, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish 
a cooperative research and development center described in para-
graph (2) at each national security laboratory. 
‘‘(2) A cooperative research and development center described 
in this paragraph is a center to foster collaborative scientific 
research, technology development, and the appropriate transfer of 
research and technology to users in addition to the national security 
laboratories. 
‘‘(3) In establishing a cooperative research and development 
center under this subsection, the Administrator— 
‘‘(A) shall enter into cooperative research and development 
agreements with governmental, public, academic, or private 
entities; and 
‘‘(B) may enter into a contract with respect to constructing, 
purchasing, managing, or leasing buildings or other facilities.’’. 
(2) DEFINITION.—Subsection (c) of such section, as redesig-
nated by paragraph (1)(A), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph: 
‘‘(5) The term ‘national security laboratory’ has the meaning 
given that term in section 3281 of the National Nuclear Security 
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471).’’. 
(3) SECTION
HEADING.—The heading of such section is 
amended by inserting ‘‘AND
COOPERATIVE
RESEARCH
AND 
DEVELOPMENT CENTERS’’ after ‘‘PARTNERSHIPS’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 
Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 4813 and inserting the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 4813. Critical technology partnerships and cooperative research and develop-
ment centers.’’. 
SEC. 3116. FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PLAN. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense 
Act (50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 
4402 the following new section: 
‘‘SEC. 4402A. FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE-
MENT PLAN. 
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy shall submit to 
Congress each year, at or about the same time that the President’s 
budget is submitted to Congress for a fiscal year under section 
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a future-years defense 
environmental management plan that— 
‘‘(1) reflects the estimated expenditures and proposed 
appropriations included in that budget for the Department 
of Energy for environmental management; and 
‘‘(2) covers a period that includes the fiscal year for which 
that budget is submitted and not less than the four succeeding 
fiscal years. 
50 USC 2582a. 
Contracts. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01058
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4513 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—Each future-years defense environmental 
management plan required by subsection (a) shall contain the fol-
lowing: 
‘‘(1) A detailed description of the projects and activities 
relating to defense environmental management to be carried 
out during the period covered by the plan at the sites specified 
in subsection (c) and with respect to the activities specified 
in subsection (d). 
‘‘(2) A statement of proposed budget authority, estimated 
expenditures, and proposed appropriations necessary to support 
such projects and activities. 
‘‘(3) With respect to each site specified in subsection (c), 
the following: 
‘‘(A) A statement of each milestone included in an 
enforceable agreement governing cleanup and waste 
remediation for that site for each fiscal year covered by 
the plan. 
‘‘(B) For each such milestone, a statement with respect 
to whether each such milestone will be met in each such 
fiscal year. 
‘‘(C) For any milestone that will not be met, an expla-
nation of why the milestone will not be met and the date 
by which the milestone is expected to be met. 
‘‘(c) SITES SPECIFIED.—The sites specified in this subsection 
are the following: 
‘‘(1) The Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho. 
‘‘(2) The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico. 
‘‘(3) The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina. 
‘‘(4) The Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Ten-
nessee. 
‘‘(5) The Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. 
‘‘(6) Any defense closure site of the Department of Energy. 
‘‘(7) Any site of the National Nuclear Security Administra-
tion. 
‘‘(d) ACTIVITIES SPECIFIED.—The activities specified in this sub-
section are the following: 
‘‘(1) Program support. 
‘‘(2) Program direction. 
‘‘(3) Safeguards and security. 
‘‘(4) Technology development and deployment. 
‘‘(5) Federal contributions to the Uranium Enrichment 
Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund established under 
section 1801 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 
2297g).’’. 
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 
Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 4402 the following new item: 
‘‘Sec. 4402A. Future-years defense environmental management plan.’’. 
SEC. 3117. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY 
FOR 
APPOINTMENT 
OF 
CERTAIN 
SCIENTIFIC, 
ENGINEERING, AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL. 
Section 4601(c)(1) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 
2701(c)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and 
inserting ‘‘September 30, 2016’’. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01059
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4514 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
SEC. 3118. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY 
TO ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN 
RESEARCH PROJECTS. 
Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 
30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 
SEC. 3119. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE INTER-
NATIONAL MATERIALS PROTECTION, CONTROL, AND 
ACCOUNTING 
PROGRAM 
OF 
THE 
DEPARTMENT 
OF 
ENERGY. 
Section 3156(b)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 50 
U.S.C. 2343(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2013’’ and 
inserting ‘‘January 1, 2018’’. 
SEC. 3120. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRANSFER OF PARCELS OF 
LAND TO BE CONVEYED TO LOS ALAMOS COUNTY, NEW 
MEXICO, AND HELD IN TRUST FOR THE PUEBLO OF SAN 
ILDEFONSO. 
(a) ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.—If the Secretary of Energy 
determines under any authority previously established by law that 
a parcel of land described in subsection (c) requires environmental 
restoration or remediation, the Secretary shall, to the maximum 
extent practicable, complete the environmental restoration or 
remediation of the parcel not later than September 30, 2022, and 
otherwise in compliance with such law. 
(b) CONVEYANCE OR TRANSFER.—If the Secretary determines 
under any authority previously established by law that environ-
mental restoration or remediation cannot reasonably be expected 
to be completed with respect to a parcel of land described in sub-
section (c) by September 30, 2022, the Secretary shall not convey 
or transfer the parcel of land. 
(c) PARCELS OF LAND.—A parcel of land described in this sub-
section is a parcel of land under the jurisdiction or administrative 
control of the Secretary at or in the vicinity of Los Alamos National 
Laboratory that the Secretary has previously identified as suitable 
for conveyance or transfer in a report submitted to the congressional 
defense committees prior to the date of the enactment of this 
Act. 
SEC. 3121. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION FOR MODIFICATION OF 
MINOR 
CONSTRUCTION 
THRESHOLD 
FOR 
PLANT 
PROJECTS. 
(a) MINOR CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD.—Paragraph (3) of sec-
tion 4701 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741(3)), 
as amended by section 3118(b) of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2709), 
is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 
(b) NOTIFICATION.—Section 3118(c) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 
Stat. 2709) is amended by striking ‘‘during fiscal year 2010’’. 
SEC. 3122. ENHANCING PRIVATE-SECTOR EMPLOYMENT THROUGH 
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVI-
TIES. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 
encourage cooperative research and development activities at the 
50 USC 2465. 
50 USC 2743 
note. 
42 USC 2391 
note. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01060
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4515 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
national security laboratories (as defined in section 3281 of the 
National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471)) 
that lead to the creation of new private-sector employment 
opportunities. 
(b) REPORTS.—Not later than January 31 of each year from 
2012 through 2017, the Administrator shall submit to Congress 
a report detailing the number of new private-sector employment 
opportunities created as a result of the previous years’ cooperative 
research and development activities at each national security lab-
oratory. 
SEC. 3123. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 
CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN COUNTRIES OUTSIDE OF 
THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 
Not more than $500,000 of the funds authorized to be appro-
priated by section 3101(a)(2) for defense nuclear nonproliferation 
activities may be obligated or expended to establish a center of 
excellence in a country that is not a state of the former Soviet 
Union until the date that is 15 days after the date on which 
the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional 
defense committees a report that includes the following: 
(1) An identification of the country in which the center 
will be located. 
(2) A description of the purpose for which the center will 
be established. 
(3) The agreement under which the center will operate. 
(4) A funding plan for the center, including— 
(A) the amount of funds to be provided by the govern-
ment of the country in which the center will be located; 
and 
(B) the percentage of the total cost of establishing 
and operating the center the funds described in subpara-
graph (A) will cover. 
SEC. 3124. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENERGY PARKS PROGRAM. 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Energy may establish a 
program to permit the establishment of energy parks on former 
defense nuclear facilities. 
(b) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives for establishing energy parks 
pursuant to subsection (a) are the following: 
(1) To provide locations to carry out a broad range of 
projects relating to the development and deployment of energy 
technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies. 
(2) To provide locations for the implementation of pilot 
programs and demonstration projects for new and developing 
energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing tech-
nologies. 
(3) To set a national example for the development and 
deployment of energy technologies and related advanced manu-
facturing technologies in a manner that will promote energy 
security, energy sector employment, and energy independence. 
(4) To create a business environment that encourages 
collaboration and interaction between the public and private 
sectors. 
(c) CONSULTATION.—In establishing an energy park pursuant 
to subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with— 
(1) the local government with jurisdiction over the land 
on which the energy park will be located; 
50 USC 2814. 
Deadline. 
Reports. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01061
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4516 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(2) the local governments of adjacent areas; and 
(3) any community reuse organization recognized by the 
Secretary at the former defense nuclear facility on which the 
energy park will be located. 
(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee 
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on 
the implementation of the program under subsection (a). The report 
shall include such recommendations for additional legislative 
actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate the 
development of energy parks on former defense nuclear facilities. 
(e) DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITY DEFINED.—In this section, the 
term ‘‘defense nuclear facility’’ has the meaning given the term 
‘‘Department of Energy defense nuclear facility’’ in section 318 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g). 
Subtitle C—Reports 
SEC. 3131. REPORT ON GRADED SECURITY PROTECTION POLICY. 
(a) REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 2011, the Secretary 
of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees 
a report on the implementation of the graded security protection 
policy of the Department of Energy. 
(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 
include the following: 
(1) A comprehensive plan and schedule (including any 
benchmarks, milestones, or other deadlines) for implementing 
the graded security protection policy. 
(2) An explanation of the current status of the graded 
security protection policy for each site with respect to the 
comprehensive plan under paragraph (1). 
(3) An explanation of the Secretary’s objective end-state 
for implementation of the graded security protection policy 
(such end-state explanation shall include supporting justifica-
tion and rationale to ensure that robust and adaptive security 
measures meet the graded security protection policy require-
ments). 
(4) Identification of each site that has received an exception 
or waiver to the graded security protection policy, including 
the justification for each such exception or waiver. 
(5) A schedule for ‘‘force-on-force’’ exercises that the Sec-
retary considers necessary to maintain operational readiness. 
(6) A description of a program that will provide proper 
training and equipping of personnel to a certifiable standard. 
(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be sub-
mitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01062
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4517 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR 
FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 
Sec. 3201. Authorization. 
SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION. 
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011, 
$28,640,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities 
Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 
(42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 
TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM 
RESERVES 
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 
SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 
(a) AMOUNT.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
to the Secretary of Energy $23,614,000 for fiscal year 2011 for 
the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 
10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. 
(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 
the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain 
available until expended. 
TITLE XXXV—MARITIME 
ADMINISTRATION 
Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the mer-
chant marine for fiscal year 2011. 
Sec. 3502. Extension of Maritime Security Fleet program. 
Sec. 3503. United States Merchant Marine Academy nominations of residents of 
the Northern Mariana Islands. 
Sec. 3504. Research authority. 
SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL 
SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR 
FISCAL YEAR 2011. 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
2011, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided 
in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transpor-
tation for Maritime Administration programs associated with 
maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as 
follows: 
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United 
States Merchant Marine Academy, $100,020,000, of which— 
(A) $63,120,000 shall remain available until expended 
for Academy operations; 
(B) $6,000,000 shall remain available until expended 
for refunds to Academy midshipmen for improperly charged 
fees; and 
(C) $30,900,000 shall remain available until expended 
for capital improvements at the Academy. 
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime 
academies, $15,007,000, of which— 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01063
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4518 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
(A) $2,000,000 shall remain available until expended 
for student incentive payments; 
(B) $2,000,000 shall remain available until expended 
for direct payments to such academies; and 
(C) $11,007,000 shall remain available until expended 
for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy 
training vessels. 
(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the 
National Defense Reserve Fleet, $10,000,000. 
(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States- 
flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs 
of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United 
States Code, $174,000,000. 
(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 
Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees 
under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United 
States Code, $60,000,000, of which $3,688,000 shall remain 
available until expended for administrative expenses of the 
program. 
SEC. 3502. EXTENSION OF MARITIME SECURITY FLEET PROGRAM. 
Chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in section 53104(a), by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 
‘‘2025’’; 
(2) in section 53106(a)(1)(C), by striking ‘‘for each fiscal 
years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘for each 
of fiscal years 2012 though 2025’’; and 
(3) in section 53111(3), by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 
‘‘2025’’. 
SEC. 3503. UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY NOMINA-
TIONS OF RESIDENTS OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA 
ISLANDS. 
Section 51302(b) of title 46, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘the Northern Mariana 
Islands,’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’; and 
(2) by striking paragraph (5) and redesignating paragraph 
(6) as paragraph (5). 
SEC. 3504. RESEARCH AUTHORITY. 
Section 51301 title 46, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting ‘‘as an institution of higher education’’ 
after ‘‘Academy’’; and 
(2) by striking ‘‘States.’’ and inserting ‘‘States, to conduct 
research with respect to maritime-related matters, and to pro-
vide such other appropriate academic support, assistance, 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01064
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6581
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB
124 STAT. 4519 
PUBLIC LAW 111–383—JAN. 7, 2011 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6523: 
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 
Dec. 17, considered and passed House. 
Dec. 22, considered and passed Senate, amended. House concurred in Senate 
amendments. 
DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2011): 
Jan. 7, Presidential statement. 
training, and activities in accordance with the provisions of 
this chapter as the Secretary may authorize.’’. 
Approved January 7, 2011. 
VerDate Mar 15 2010 
08:34 Dec 07, 2012
Jkt 089194
PO 00004
Frm 01065
Fmt 6580
Sfmt 6580
G:\GSDD\STATUTES\2010\PT4\89194PT4.001
89194PT4
dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with $$_JOB