Military Construction Authorization Act, 1986
PL 99-167 (S.1042), enacted 12/03/1985

PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 961 
Public Law 99-167 
99th Congress 
An Act 
To authorize certain construction at military installations for fisc£il year 1986, and 
Dec. 3, 1985 
for other purposes. 
[S. 1042] 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled. 
Military 
_ 
„ 
Construction 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE 
Authorization 
This Act may be cited as the "MiHtary Construction Authoriza- 
^^^' ^^^^ 
tion Act, 1986". 
TITLE I—ARMY 
SEC. 101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
Real property. 
PROJECTS 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—(1) The Secretary of the Army 
may acquire real property and may carry out mihtary construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations inside the United States: 
UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND 
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $68,380,000. 
Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $26,200,000. 
Fort Carson, Colorado, $5J,350,000. 
Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $610,000. 
Fort Drum, New York, $85,490,000. 
Fort Greely, Alaska, $2,500,000. 
Fort Hood, Texas, $78,450,000. 
Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $11,100,000. 
Fort Indiantown Gap, Pennsylvania, $5,300,000. 
Fort Irwin, California, $28,150,000. 
Fort Lewis, Washington, $104,980,000. 
Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, $940,000. 
Fort Meade, Maryland, $18,930,000. 
Fort Ord, California, $25,820,000. 
Fort Polk, Louisiana, $27,230,000. 
Fort Richardson, Alaska, $3,600,000. 
Fort Riley, Kansas, $49,290,000. 
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $1,440,000. 
Fort Sheridan, Illinois, $3,500,000. 
Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,600,000. 
Fort Wainwright, Alaska, $14,000,000. 
Presidio of Monterey, California, $2,650,000. 
Yakima Firing Center, Washingtx)n, $16,430,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND 
Fort Shafter, Hawaii, $6,300,000. 
Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, $2,150,000. 
Schofield Banacks, Hawaii, $32,460,000. 
99 STAT. 962 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 
Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia, $6,450,000. 
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, $34,300,000. 
Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,300,000. 
Fort Benning, Georgia, $39,650,000. 
. , y 
Fort Bliss, Texas, $31,760,000. 
Fort Dix, New Jersey, $6,100,000. 
Fort Gordon, Georgia, $46,040,000. 
Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $6,600,000. 
Fort Knox, Kentucky, $20,770,000. 
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, $6,900,000. 
Fort Lee, Vii^nia, $13,082,000. 
Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, $12,350,000. 
Fort McClellan, Alabama, $39,350,000. 
Fort ;*ickett, Virginia, $420,000. 
Fort Rucker, Alabama, $11,950,000. 
Fort Sill, Oklahoma, $52,000,000. 
Fort Story, Virginia, $1,950,000. 
MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 
Fort Myer, Virginia, $8,300,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, $4,670,000. 
Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, $8,960,000. 
Army Materiel and Mechanics Research Center, Massachusetts, 
$770,000. 
Corpus Christi Army Depot, Texas, $4,400,000. 
Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, $320,000. 
Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, $8,650,000. 
Fort Wingate, New Mexico, $490,000. 
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, Oklahoma, $2,300,000. 
Navajo Depot Activity, Arizona, $240,000. 
New Cumberland Army Depot, Pennsylvania, $88,000,000. 
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, $1,000,000. 
Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, $19,000,000. 
Pueblo Depot Activity, Colorado, $200,000. 
Red River Army Depot, Texas, $820,000. 
Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, $25,750,000. 
Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois, $29,000,000. 
Sacramento Army IDepot, California, $4,550,000. 
Savanna Army I)e»x)t, Illinois, $510,000. 
Seneca Army Depot, New York, $1,410,000. 
Sierra Army Depot, California, $2,600,000. 
Tooele Army Depot, Utah, $11,490,000. 
UmatUla Depot Activity, Oregon, $260,000. 
Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, $240,000. 
AMMUNITION FACILITIES 
Holston Army Ammunition Plant, Tennessee, $320,000. 
Indiana Army Ammunition Plant, Indiana, $210,000. 
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Iowa, $810,000. 
Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, Kansas, $570,000. 
Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Missouri, $930,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 963 
Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, Louisiana, $640,000. 
Newport Army Ammunition Plant, Indiana, $8,000,000. 
Radford Army Ammunition Plant, Virginia, $2,910,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMAND 
Fort Huachuca, Arizona, $2,050,000. 
UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY 
United States Military Academy, New York, $31,000,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY HEALTH SERVICES COMMAND 
Fort Detrick, Maryland, $7,600,000. 
Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $970,000. 
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, District of 
Columbia, $1,150,000. 
MILTTARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT COMMAND 
Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, New Jersey, $3,200,000. 
Oakland Army Base, California, $330,000. 
Sunny 
Point 
Military 
Ocean 
Terminal, 
North 
Carolina, 
$1,200,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
Humphreys 
Engineer 
Center, 
Supt. 
Activity, 
Virginia, 
$11,000,000. 
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 
Various, United States, $3,000,000. 
(2) Funds appropriated for construction of an Army aviation 
Prohibition. 
museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama, that is authorized in paragraph 
(1) may not be obligated for that purpose unless the Secretary of the 
Army determines that an amount equal to the amount appropriated 
for that purpose has been made available for such purpose from 
private sources. 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Army may 
acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations outside the United States: 
UNITED STATES ARMY, JAPAN 
Japan, $1,050,000. 
EIGHTH UNITED STATES ARMY 
Camp Carroll, Korea, $25,380,000. 
Camp Casey, Korea, $12,920,000. 
Camp Castle, Korea, $1,100,000. 
Camp Colbern, Korea, $550,000. 
Camp Edwards, Korea, $1,090,000. 
Camp Gary Owen, Korea, $580,000. 
Camp Giant, Korea, $1,050,000. 
Camp Greaves, Korea, $420,000. 
Camp Hovey, Korea, $8,300,000. 
Camp Howze, Korea, $1,980,000. 
99 STAT. 964 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Camp Humphreys, Korea, $11,600,000. 
Camp Kittyhawk, Korea, $1,600,000. 
Camp Kyle, Korea, $3,580,000. 
Camp Liberty Bell, Korea, $800,000. 
Camp Market, Korea, $710,000. 
Camp Page, Korea, $32,650,000. 
Camp Pelham, Korea, $2,400,000. 
Camp Red Ooud, Korea, $1,730,000. 
Camp Stanley, Korea, $5,500,000. 
K-16 Army Airfield, Korea, $2,350,000. 
Location 177, Korea, $2,290,000. 
Yongin, Korea, $2,550,000. 
., i 
Yongson, Korea, $9,800,000. 
BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEBIS COliMAND 
Kwajalein, $14,600,000. 
UNTTED STATES ARMY FOBCES OOBOlfAND OVERSEAS 
Panama, $5,480,000. 
UNITED STATES ARMY, EUROPE AND SEVENTH ARMY 
Amberg, Germany, $850,000. 
Ansbach, Germany, $14,390,000. 
^^ 
Bad Kreuznach, CJermany, $1,100,000. 
Bad Toelz, Germany, $1,850,000. 
Bamberg, Germany, $6,490,000. 
Baumholder, Germany, $900,000. 
* 
Darmstadt, Germany, $29,200,000. 
Frankfurt, Germany, $18,680,000. 
Friedberg, Germany, $9,150,000. 
Fulda, Germany, $7,200,000. 
Giessen, Germany, $1,700,000. 
Goeppingen, Germany, $10,250,000. 
Grafenwoehr, Germany, $2,450,000. 
Haingruen, dermany, $680,000. 
Hanau, Germany, $48,140,000. 
Heidelberg, Germany, $8,800,000. 
Heilbronn, Germany, $2,950,000. 
Hohenfels, Germany, $6,300,000. 
Kaiserslautem, Germany, $3,450,000. 
Karlsruhe, Germany, $4,020,000. 
Neu Uhn, Germany, $1,000,000. 
;,.j: 
Nuremberg, Germany, $8,500,000. 
Pirmasens, Germany, $14,000,000. 
Schoeningen, Germany, $700,000. 
Schweinfurt, Germany, $17,840,000. 
Stuttgart, Germany, $4,500,000. 
Vilseck, Germany, $10,290,000. 
Wiesbaden, Germany, $2,900,000. 
WUdflecken, Germany, $20,000,000. 
Wuerzburg, Germany, $48,070,000. 
Various Locations, Germany, $101,000,000. 
Various Locations, Greece, $1,440,000. 
Various Locations, Italy, $1,850,000. 
Various Locations, Turkey, $7,440,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 965 
SEC. 102. FAMILY HOUSING 
The Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family 
housing units (including land acquisition) at the following installa-
tions in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for 
each installation: 
Fort Ord, California, six hundred units and seventy manufac-
tured home spaces, $50,640,000. 
Fort Carson, Colorado, fifty manufactured home spaces, 
$712,000. 
Fort Stewart, Georgia, twenty manufactured home spaces, 
$253,000. 
Bamberg, Germany, one hundred and six units, $7,209,000. 
Various locations, Germany, ninety-eight units, $6,120,000. 
Vilsek, 
Germany, 
three 
hundred 
and 
seventy 
units, 
$26,830,000. 
Fort Riley, Kansas, fifty manufactured home spaces, $700,000. 
Fort Campbell, Kentucky, fifty manufactured home spaces, 
$689,000. 
Fort Devens, Massachusetts, twenty manufactured home 
spaces, $317,000. 
Fort Drum, New York, eight hundred units, $67,500,000. 
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, two units by reconfiguration and 
fifty manufactured home spaces, $637,000. 
Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, one hundred and four units 
and twenty-four manufactured home spaces, $8,674,000. 
Fort Myer, Virginia, six units, $596,000. 
SEC. 103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS 
(a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—(1) Subject to section 2825 of title 10, 
Energy. 
United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may make expendi-
tures to improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $167,521,000, of which $10,950,000 is available 
only for energy conservation projects. 
(2) Of the funds appropriated pursuant to authorizations made in 
subsection (a) and in section 601(a) for support of military family 
Post, p. 979. 
housing, the Secretary of the Army shall use $1,521,000 for housing 
improvements at Watervliet Arsenal, New York. 
O
b
) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit 
for an improvement project under section 28250t>) of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary of the Army may carry out projects to 
improve existing military family housing units at the following 
installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount 
shown, for each installation: 
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, District of 
Columbia, one unit, $99,000. 
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, one hundred and sixty-four units, 
$4,712,000. 
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, eighty-one units, 
$2,762,000. 
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, three hundred and sixty-six 
units, $14,800,000. 
(c) FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS AT FORT MONMOUTH, NEW 
JERSEY.—The housing units specified in subsection (b) for Fort Mon-
mouth, New Jersey, includes 135 units authorized in section 101 of 
this Act and 231 units authorized in section 101 of the Military 
99 STAT. 966 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Construction Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 
98 Stat. 1495. 
1498). 
SEC. 104. MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, FORT LEWIS, WASHINGTON 
Section 601(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 
1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 1512), is amended by striking out 
"and the amount specified in subsection (b)" and inserting in lieu 
thereof ", the amount specified in subsection (b)(1), and $326,800,000 
(the amount authorized for the construction of the Madigan Army 
Medical Center, Fort Lewis, Washington)". 
TITLE II—NAVY 
Real property. 
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION 
PROJECTS 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations inside the United States: 
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 
Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, California, $530,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, South Carolina, $6,905,000. 
Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, 
California, $1,470,000. 
Marine Corps Camp Detachment, Camp Elmore, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, $3,995,000. 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, $24,140,000. 
Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, $25,175,000. 
Marine 
Corps 
Air 
Facility, 
Camp 
Pendleton, 
California, 
$14,310,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina, 
$36,450,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, $30,375,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, $17,420,000. 
Marine 
Corps 
Air 
Station, 
New 
River, 
North 
Carolina, 
$10,780,000. 
Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, 
$3,610,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, California, $17,970,000. 
Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, 
California, $22,670,000. 
Marine Corps Development and Education Command, Quantico, 
Virginia, $7,060,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma, Arizona, $16,750,000. 
CHIEF OF NAVAL RESEARCH 
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, 
$28,900,000. 
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE NAVY 
Navy Finance Center, Cleveland, Ohio, $2,940,000. 
CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 
Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, $18,480,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 967 
Naval Space Command, Dahlgren, Virginia, $4,700,000. 
Navy Regional Data Automation Center, Jacksonville, Florida, 
$10,300,000. 
Naval Space Surveillance Field Station, Lewisville, Arkansas, 
$675,000. 
Navy Tactical Interoperability Support Activity, Mayport, Flor-
ida, $470,000. 
Navy Tactical Interoperability Support Activity, North Island, 
California, $585,000. 
Navy Regional Data Automation Center, Norfolk, Virginia, 
$10,880,000. 
Intelligence Center, Pacific, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $2,900,000. 
Naval Space Surveillance Field Station, San Diego, California, 
$600,000. 
Commandant Naval District, Washington, District of Columbia, 
$6,300,000. 
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ATLANTIC FLEET 
Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine, $3,040,000. 
Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida, $29,835,000. 
Naval Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $9,960,000. 
Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida, $5,800,000. 
Naval Amphibious Base, Little Creek, Virginia, $16,370,000. 
Naval Station, Mayport, Florida, $10,820,000. 
Naval Submarine Base, New London, Connecticut, $365,000. 
Naval Station, New York, New York, $33,160,000. 
Naval Air Station, Norfolk, Virginia, $10,675,000. 
Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, $800,000. 
Naval Air Station, Oceana, Virginia, $16,940,000. 
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PACIFIC FLEET 
Naval Facility, Adak, Alaska, $2,650,000. 
Naval Air Station, Alameda, California, $8,650,000. 
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, Washington, $5,200,000. 
Amphibious Task Force, Camp Pendleton, California, $9,020,000. 
Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado, California, $16,150,000. 
Naval Station, Everett, Washington, $17,640,000. 
Naval Air Station, Fallon, Nevada, $36,500,000. 
Naval Air Station, Lemoore, California, $2,300,000. 
Naval Station, Long Beach, California, $16,000,000. 
Naval Air Station, Miramar, California, $385,000. 
Naval Air Station, North Island, California, $18,593,000. 
Commander, Oceanographic System, Pacific, Pearl 
Harbor, 
Hawaii, $1,180,000. 
Naval Submarine Base, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $2,900,000. 
Naval Station, San Diego, California, $16,197,000. 
Naval Submarine Base, San Diego, California, $14,120,000. 
Naval Station Mare Island, Vallejo, California, $735,000. 
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Washington, $2,650,000. 
CHIEF OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING 
Fleet and Mine Warfare Training Center, Charleston, South Caro-
lina, $1,180,000. 
Naval Amphibious School, Coronado, California, $9,330,000. 
99 STAT. 968 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Surface Warfare Officers School Comm£uid Detachment, Coro-
nado, California, $5,200,000. 
Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas, $4,360,000. 
Fleet Combat Training Center, Atlantic, Dam Neck, Virginia, 
$9,640,000. 
Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal School, Eglin, Florida, 
$13,700,000. 
Naval Traming Center, Great Lakes, Illinois, $20,740,000. 
Naval Construction Training Center, Gulfport, 
Mississippi, 
$2,460,000. 
Naval Amphibious School, Little Creek, Virginia, $420,000. 
Naval Air Station, Memphis, Tennessee, $11,695,000. 
Naval Air Station, Meridian, Mississippi, $450,000. 
Naval Submarine School, New London, Connecticut, $13,300,000. 
Naval Education and Training Center, Newport, Rhode Island, 
$19,580,000. 
Naval Training Center, Orlando, Florida, $9,400,000. 
Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida, $225,000. 
Naval Technical Training Center, Pensacola, Florida, $5,670,000. 
Naval Construction Training Center, Port Hueneme, California, 
$4,800,000. 
Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center, Pacific, San 
Diego, California, $7,850,000. 
Fleet Combat Training Center, Pacific, San Diego, California, 
$305,000. 
Fleet Training Center, San Diego, California, $4,750,000. 
Naval Training Center, San Diego, California, $2,900,000. 
Naval Technical Training Center, San Francisco, California, 
$1,570,000. 
Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Florida, $810,000. 
NAVAL MILITARY PERSONNEL COMMAND 
Navy Band, Washington, District of Columbia, $1,900,000. 
NAVAL MEDICAL COMMAND 
Naval Medical Clinic, Annapolis, Maryland, $12,540,000. 
Naval Hospital, Groton, Connecticut, $8,720,000. 
Naval Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, $18,600,000. 
Naval Hospital, Long Beach, California, $6,300,000. 
Naval Hospital, Oak Harbor, Washington, $13,900,000. 
Naval Hospital, Pensacola, Florida, $7,250,000. 
Naval Hospital, San Diego, California, $450,000. 
CHIEF OF NAVAL MATERIEL 
Naval Air Rework Facility, Alameda, California, $22,780,000. 
Puget 
Sound 
Naval 
Shipyard, 
Bremerton, 
Wsishington, 
$30,945,000. 
Naval Supply Center, Bremerton, Washington, $1,520,000. 
Naval Weapons Station, Charleston, South Carolina, $4,070,000. 
Polaris Missile Facility, Atlantic, Charleston, South Carolina, 
$1,620,000. 
Naval Air Rework Facility, Cherry Point, North Carolina, 
$1,720,000. 
Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, $9,315,000. 
Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, $3,720,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 969 
Naval Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport, 
Mississippi, 
$2,550,000. 
Naval Ordance Station, Indian Head, Maryland, $1,570,000. 
Naval Supply Center, Jacksonville, Florida, $1,555,000. 
Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station, Keyport, Washing-
ton, $2,440,000. 
Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia, $388,360,000. 
Naval Air Engineering Center, Lakehurst, New Jersey, $600,000. 
Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Long Beach, California, $7,160,000. 
Naval Ordnance Station, Louisville, Kentucky, $16,950,000. 
Naval Air Rework Facility, Norfolk, Virgmia, $13,080,000. 
Naval Supply Center, Norfolk, Virginia, $2,350,000. 
Naval Air Rework Facility, North Island, California, $9,465,000. 
Naval Supply Center, Oakland, California, $7,890,000. 
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $1,860,000. 
Navy Public Works Center, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, $13,700,000. 
Navy Public Works Center, Pensacola, Florida, $8,430,000. 
Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu, California, $10,200,000. 
Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, California, 
$23,650,000. 
Naval Ship Weapon Systems Engineering Station, Port Hueneme, 
California, $10,780,000. 
Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Center, Portsmouth, Vir-
ginia, $3,255,000. 
Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Virginia, $6,690,000. 
Naval Supply Center, San Diego, California, $7,100,000. 
Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Saint Inigoes, 
Maryland, $15,550,000. 
Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, California, $815,000. 
Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, Pennsylvania, 
$4,220,000. 
Naval Mine Warfare Engineering Activity, Yorktown, Virginia, 
$4,120,000. 
NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY CX)MMAND 
Naval Oceanography Command Facility, Jacksonville, Florida, 
$390,000. 
Naval Western Oceanography Center, Peeirl Harbor, Hawaii, 
$4,500,000. 
NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND 
Naval Radio Station, Sugar Grove, West Virginia, $785,000. 
NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND 
Naval Security Group Activity, Adak, Alaska, $980,000. 
Naval Security Group Activity, Northwest, Chesapeake, Virginia, 
$1,385,000. 
Naval Security Group Activity, Skaggs Island, 
California, 
$395,000. 
Naval Security Group Activity, Winter Harbor, Maine, $3,280,000. 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNFTED STATES.—The Secretary of the Navy may 
acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations outside the United States: 
99 STAT. 970 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
MARINE CORPS 
Marine Corps Air Station, Iwakuni, Japan, $1,775,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, Futenma, Okinawa, Japan, $2,990,000. 
Marine Corps Base Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Japan, 
$2,250,000. 
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, ATLANTIC FLEET 
Naval Facility, Antigua, West Indies, $2,410,000. 
Naval Facility, Argentia, Newfoundland, Canada, $700,000. 
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, $22,410,000. 
Naval Station, Keflavik, Iceland, $21,780,000. 
Atlantic Fleet Weapons Training Facility, Roosevelt Roads, 
Puerto Rico, $7,100,000. 
Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $14,700,000. 
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, PACIFIC FLEET 
Navy Support Facility, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, $16,530,000. 
Naval Air Facility, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, $22,450,000. 
Naval Magazine, Guam, $11,270,000. 
Naval Supply Depot, Guam, $6,550,000. 
Naval Station, Guam, $10,200,000. 
Naval Ship Repair Facility, Guam, $990,000. 
Naval Magazine, Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines, $250,000. 
Naval Ship Repair Facility, Subic Bay, Republic of the Phil-
ippines, $13,270,000. 
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, UNITED STATES NAVAL FORCES EUROPE 
Naval Activities, London, United Kingdom, $7,635,000. 
Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy, $7,750,000. 
Naval Air Station, Sigonella, Italy, $5,930,000. 
Personnel Support Activity, London, United Kingdom, $450,000. 
CHIEF OF NAVAL MATERIEL 
Navy Public Works Center, Guam, $1,080,000. 
Navy Public Works Center, Yokosuka, Japan, $4,400,000. 
NAVAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMAND 
Naval Communication Area Master Station, Western Pacific, 
Guam, $8,945,000. 
Naval Communication Station, Harold E. Holt, Exmouth, Aus-
tralia, $2,690,000. 
NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND 
Naval Security Group Detachment, Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean, 
$3,700,000. 
HOST NATION INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT 
Various Locations, $980,000. 
SEC. 202. FAMILY HOUSING 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may construct or 
acquire family housing units (including land acquisition) at the 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 971 
following installations in the number of units shown, and in the 
amount shown, for each installation: 
Naval Air Station, Adak, Alaska, one hundred units, 
$15,500,000. 
Marine Corps Air Station, El Toro, California, two hundred 
and eighty-two units, $29,800,000. 
Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, 
California, one hundred units, $8,400,000. 
Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, California, two hun-
dred units, $15,200,000. 
Fleet Training Group Pacific, Warner Springs, California, 
forty-four units, $4,400,000. 
Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, two hundred 
units, $15,400,000. 
Aviation Supply Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, one unit, 
$170,000. 
Navy Public Works Center, Subic Bay, Republic of the Phil-
ippines, three hundred units, $24,180,000. 
(b) NAVAL PUBLIC WORKS CENTER, SAN DIEGO.—The Secretary of 
the Navy may construct the two hundred housing units authorized 
by subsection (a) for the Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, 
California, at Telegraph Point or at any other suitable and available 
site. 
SEC. 203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS 
(a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—Subject to section 2825 of title 10, 
United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may make expendi-
tures to improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $34,020,000. 
(b) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit 
for an improvement project under section 2825(b) of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out projects to 
improve existing military family housing units at the following 
installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount 
shown, for each installation: 
Navy Public Works Center, San Diego, California, three hun-
dred and seventy-two units, $17,610,000. 
Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Washington, one unit, 
$56,500. 
SEC. 204. TRANSIENT HOUSING UNITS, CHINHAE, KOREA 
The Secretary of the Navy may convert the four existing transient 
housing units contained in Building 706 in Chinhae, Korea, to 
family housing units. 
SEC. 205. RESTRICTION ON FUNDING FOR NAVY STRATEGIC HOME-
PORTING 
Funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization in section 602 
Post, p. 980. 
for Naval Strategic Homeporting may not be obligated or expended 
for such purpose until— 
(1) the Secretary of the Navy has submitted to the Congress a 
Report. 
report justifying the expenditure of the funds for such purpose; 
and 
(2) a period of 90 days has elapsed after the day on which the 
report is received by the Congress. 
99 STAT. 972 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
« 
-f 
TITLE m—AIR FORCE 
Real property. 
SEC. 301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISI-
TION PROJECTS 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations inside the United States: 
AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND 
Hill Air Force Base, Utah, $28,280,000. 
Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, $39,749,000. 
McClellan Air Force Base, California, $53,829,000. 
Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, $7,350,000. 
Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $31,500,000. 
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, $21,890,000. 
AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND 
Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, $2,500,000. 
Edwards Air Force Base, California, $7,250,000. 
Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, $14,560,000. 
Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, $24,700,000. 
Sunnyvale Air Force Station, California, $2,700,000. 
AIR FORCE RESERVE 
Billy Mitchell Field, Wisconsin, $500,000. 
,, 
AIR NATIONAL GUARD 
Buckley Air National Guard Base, Colorado, $12,370,000. 
AIR TRAINING COMMAND 
Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois, $1,730,000. 
Goodfellow Air Force Base, Texas, $27,500,000. 
Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, $10,500,000. 
Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, $22,750,000. 
Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas, $1,900,000. 
Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, $6,850,000. 
Mather Air Force Base, California, $2,700,000. 
Randolph Air Force Base, Texas, $3,200,000. 
Reese Air Force Base, Texas, $3,250,000. 
Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas, $16,150,000. 
Vance Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $4,210,000. 
Williams Air Force Base, Arizona, $660,000. 
AIR UNIVERSITY 
'" 
Gunter Air Force Station, Alabama, $6,000,000. 
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, $12,000,000. 
^*« 
ALASKAN AIR COMMAND 
Attu Research Site, Alaska, $910,000. 
t rie 
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, $44,950,000. 
^o A. 
Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska, $5,000,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 973 
King Salmon Airport, Alaska, $8,600,000. 
Shemya Air Force Base, Alaska, $45,900,000. 
MIUTARY AIRUFT COMMAND 
Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, $11,450,000. 
Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, $10,120,000. 
Base 24, Classified Location, $6,170,000. 
Boiling Air Force Base, District of Columbia, $250,000. 
Charleston Air Force Base, South Carolina, $1,620,000. 
Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, $16,890,000. 
Eglin Auxiliary Field 9, Florida, $1,700,000. 
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, $60,330,000. 
McChord Air Force Base, Washington, $2,240,000. 
McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey, $14,550,000. 
Norton Air Force Base, California, $4,570,000. 
Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina, $440,000. 
Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, $17,150,000. 
Travis Air Force Base, California, $10,300,000. 
PACIFIC AIR FORCES 
Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, $480,000. 
Wheeler Air Force Base, Hawaii, $2,850,000. 
SPACE COMMAND 
Cape Cod Air Force Station, Massachusetts, $600,000. 
Cavalier Air Force Station, North Dakota, $950,000. 
Clear Air Force Station, Alaska, $4,500,000. 
Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, $5,200,000. 
SPECIAL PROJECT 
Various Locations, $55,000,000. 
STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND 
Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, $1,400,000. 
Base 34, Classified Location, $8,920,000. 
Beale Air Force Base, California, $5,850,000. 
Belle Fourche Air Force Station, South Dakota, $4,080,000. 
Blytheville Air Force Base, Arkansas, $3,750,000. 
Carswell Air Force Base, Texas, $1,000,000. 
Castle Air Force Base, California, $3,300,000. 
Dyess Air Force Base, Texas, $16,950,000. 
Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, $72,064,000. 
Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, $12,500,000. 
F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, $15,310,000. 
Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, $62,730,000. 
Griffiss Air Force Base, New York, $2,740,000. 
Grissom Air Force Base, Indiana, $1,700,000. 
K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base, Michigan, $22,580,000. 
Malmstrom Air Force Bgise, Montana, $1,300,000. 
March Air Force Base, California, $9,000,000. 
McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, $66,490,000. 
Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, $5,000,000. 
Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, $10,440,000. 
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire, $1,200,000. 
99 STAT. 974 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York, $1,050,000. 
Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, $1,960,000. 
Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, $4,650,000. 
Wurtsmith Air Force Base, Michigan, $5,300,000. 
TACTICAL AIR COMMAND 
Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas, $770,000. 
Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, $12,500,000. 
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, $5,730,000. 
England Air Force Base, Louisiana, $2,600,000. 
George Air Force Base, California, $5,240,000. 
HoUoman Air Force Base, New Mexico, $16,850,000. 
Homestead Air Force Base, Florida, $7,015,000. 
Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, $8,680,000. 
Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, $14,780,000. 
MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, $8,850,000. 
Moody Air Force Base, Geoi^a, $24,030,000. 
Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, $14,600,000. 
Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, South Carolina, $430,000. 
Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, $17,860,000. 
Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina, $2,320,000. 
Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, $13,300,000. 
Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, $8,780,000, 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY 
Air Force Academy, Colorado, $10,310,000. 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of the Air Force 
may acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amoimts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations outside the United States: 
MILITARY AIRUFT COMMAND 
<+£• - 
h"; 
Lajes Field, Portugal, $25,285,000. 
Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany, $1,500,000. 
PACIFIC AIR FORCES 
Camp Zama, Japan, $1,500,000. 
Kadena Air Base, Japan, $27,650,000. 
Misawa Air Base, Japan, $9,500,000. 
Yokota Air Base, Japan, $10,400,000. 
Kimhae Air Base, Korea, $10,400,000. 
Kunsan Air Base, Korea, $9,000,000. 
KwangnJu Air Base, Korea, $16,310,000. 
Osan Air Base, Korea, $24,510,000. 
Sachon Air Base, Korea, $310,000. 
Diego Garcia Air Base, Indian Ocean, $5,300,000. 
Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, $15,050,000. 
SPACE COMMAND 
Thule Air Base, Greenland, $12,350,000. 
Sondrestrom Air Base, Greenland, $5,750,000. 
GEODSS Site 5, Portugal, $14,650,000. 
Pirinclik Air Station, Turkey, $2,600,000. 
BMEWS Site IB, Fylingdales, United Kingdom, $3,100,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 975 
TACTICAL AIR COMMAND 
Howard Air Force Base, Panama, $2,172,000. 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCES IN EUROPE 
Florennes Air Base, Belgium, $5,860,000. 
Ahlhorn Air Base, Germany, $350,000. 
Bitburg Air Base, Germany, $9,050,000. 
Einsiedlerhof, Germany, $2,900,000. 
Hahn Air Base, Germany, $8,160,000. 
Hessisch Oldendorf Air Station, Germany, $1,230,000. 
Kapaun Air Station, Germany, $900,000. 
Leipheim Air Base, Germany, $350,000. 
Marienfelde Communications Station, Germany, $2,550,000. 
Norvenich Air Base, Germany, $350,000. 
Pruem Air Station, Germany, $1,250,000. 
Ramstein Air Base, Germany, $14,670,000. 
Sembach Air Base, Germany, $6,460,000. 
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, $14,860,000. 
Various Locations, Germany, $940,000. 
Vogelweh Air Station, Germany, $1,250,000. 
Wenigerath Storage Site, Germany, $1,700,000. 
Zweibrucken Air Base, Germany, $4,550,000. 
Aviano Air Base, Italy, $5,070,000. 
Comiso Air Station, Italy, $6,280,000. 
Decimomannu Air Base, Italy, $2,800,000. 
San Vito Air Station, Italy, $1,590,000. 
Morocco, $3,100,000. 
Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, $2,710,000. 
Keizerveer Air Base, The Netherlands, $270,000. 
Woensdrecht Air Base, The Netherlands, $15,980,000. 
Vught, The Netherlands, $310,000. 
Torrejon Air Base, Spain, $2,900,000. 
Ankara Air Station, Turkey, $950,000. 
Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, $11,570,000. 
Karatas, Turkey, $2,330,000. 
RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom, $20,910,000. 
RAF Bentwaters, United Kingdom, $12,050,000. 
RAF Chicksands, United Kingdom, $1,630,000. 
RAF Fairford, United Kingdom, $7,400,000. 
RAF Greenham Common, United Kingdom, $2,200,000. 
RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom, $10,320,000. 
RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom, $4,080,000. 
RAF Molesworth, United Kingdom, $21,063,000. 
RAF Sculthorpe, United Kingdom, $2,350,000. 
RAF Upper Heyford, United Kingdom, $4,640,000. 
Various Locations, United Kingdom, $3,600,000. 
Base 25, Classified Location, $4,500,000. 
Base 29, Classified Location, $3,500,000. 
Base 30, Classified Location, $4,830,000. 
Base 33, Classified Location, $9,450,000. 
Various Locations, Europe, $4,450,000. 
SEC. 302. FAMILY HOUSING 
The Secretary of the Air Force may construct or acquire family 
housing units (including land acquisition) at the following installa-
99 STAT. 976 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
tions in the number of units shown, and in the amount shown, for 
each installation: 
Florennes, Belgium, four hundred units, $29,200,000. 
Hahn Air Base, Germany, four hundred and forty units, 
$33,000,000. 
Ramstein 
Air 
Base, 
Germany, 
four 
hundred 
units, 
$30,000,000. 
Osan Air Base, Korea, family housing support facilities, 
$1,200,000. 
Camp New Amsterdam, The Netherlands, one hundred and 
forty units, $11,000,000. 
Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, four hundred and 
fifty units, $37,900,000. 
Belle Fourche Air Force Station, South Dakota, fifty units, 
$4,000,000. 
SEC. 303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS 
Energy. 
(a) AMOUNT AUTHORIZED.—Subject to section 2825 of title 10, 
United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may make 
expenditures to improve existing military family housing units in an 
amount not to exceed $61,300,000, of which $19,939,000 is available 
only for energy conservation projects. 
(b) WAIVER OF MAXIMUM PER UNIT COST FOR CERTAIN IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the maximum amount per unit 
for an improvement project under section 2825(b) of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out projects to 
improve existing military family housing units at the following 
installations in the number of units shown, and in the amount 
shown, for each installation: 
Boiling Air Force Base, District of Columbia, twenty-four 
units, $1,200,000. 
Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, eighty units, $4,006,000. 
Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, thirty-two units, $2,873,000. 
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, one hundred and ten 
units, $3,724,000. 
Ramstein Air Base, Germany, two hundred and eighty units, 
$10,279,000. 
Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, one hundred 
units, 
$6,605,000. 
Kadena Air Base, Japan, two hundred and thirty-five units, 
$12,163,000. 
Clark Air Base, Philippines, twenty-nine units, $1,042,000. 
(c) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, COLO-
RADO.—(1) To support 
the 
United 
States 
Space 
Command 
(USSPACECOM), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out an 
improvement project at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, to add to 
and alter an existing facility and (notwithstanding section 2826 of 
title 10, United States Code) convert such facility to a family hous-
ing unit with a maximum net floor area of 3,100 square feet at a cost 
not to exceed $81,000. 
(2) The amount authorized for the project by paragraph (1) shall 
not be considered an increase in the amount authorized to be 
appropriated by this Act for functions of the Department of the Air 
Force. 
(3) For purposes of this subsection, the term "net floor area" has 
the same meaning given that term by section 2826(f) of title 10, 
United States Code. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 977 
SEC. 304. RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FACILI-
TIES IN THE NETHERLANDS 
Funds appropriated to the Air Force pursuant to an authorization 
Prohibition. 
in section 603 for the construction of facilities in The Netherlands to 
Post, p. 981. 
support ground launched cruise missiles (GLCM) may not be obli-
gated or expended until the Government of The Netherlands has 
officially approved the deplojmient of such missiles in The Nether-
lands. 
SEC. 305. SPECIAL IMPACT ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICTS 
Of the funds appropriated to the Air Force for fiscal year 1986 for 
Grants. 
the acquisition of land to expand Melrose Air Force Range, New 
Mexico, the Secretary of the Air Force may use not more than 
$50,000 to provide assistance, by grant or otherwise, to school dis-
tricts in communities near the Melrose Air Force Range for pur-
poses of mitigating any adverse impact on the schools in such 
districts determined by the Secretary to result from expansion of the 
range. 
TITLE IV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 
SEC. 401. AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND LAND ACQUISI- 
Real property. 
TION FOR THE DEFENSE AGENCIES 
(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and carry out military construction projects in 
the amounts shown for each of the following installations and 
locations inside the United States: 
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Anchorage, Alaska, $1,390,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Alameda, California, $1,320,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Barstow, California, $825,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, San Diego, California, $600,000, 
Defense Fuel Support Point, San Pedro, California, $700,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Groton, Connecticut, $625,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Port Tampa, Florida, $595,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Fort Riley, Kansas, $965,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Newington, New Hampshire, 
$1,040,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Verona, New York, $1,395,000. 
Defense Depot, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, $470,000. 
Defense Depot, Memphis, Tennessee, $8,085,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Texarkana, Texas, $2,635,000. 
Defense Depot, Ogden, Utah, $3,825,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, 
Utah, $750,000. 
Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia, $5,355,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Richmond, Virginia, $650,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Manchester, Washington, $565,000. 
Defense Property Disposal Office, F.E. Warren Air Force Base, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming, $1,020,000. 
DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY 
Repromat Secure Storage Facility, Mineral Wells, Texas, $900,000. 
99 STAT. 978 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
i 
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
Fort Meade, Maryland, $82,142,000. 
OFFICE 
OF 
THE 
SECRETARY 
OP 
DEFENSE 
Classified Location, $12,000,000. 
Fort McNair, Washington, District of Columbia, $25,000,000. 
Classified Location, $3,142,000. 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SECTION 6 SCHOOLS 
Fort Benning, Georgia, $1,693,000. 
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $5,660,000. 
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, $8,400,000. 
Myrtle Beach Air Force Base, South Carolina, $1,400,000. 
Quantico, Virginia, $3,500,000. 
(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—The Secretary of Defense may 
acquire real property and may carry out military construction 
projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations 
and locations outside the United States: 
D E F E N S E LOGISTICS AGENCY 
Defense Property Disposal Office, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 
$360,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Chimu Wan, Okinawa, Japan, 
$8,160,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Pyongtaek, Korea, $5,820,000. 
Defense Fuel Support Point, Uijongbu, Korea, $6,200,000. 
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
Classified Locations, $7,150,000. 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SECTION 6 SCHOOLS 
Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, $9,753,000. 
Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, $1,200,000. 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS 
Florennes, Belgium, $7,420,000. 
Babenhausen, Germany, $760,000. 
Bamberg, Germany, $5,800,000. 
Butzbach, Germany, $3,420,000. 
Hanau, Germany, $7,480,000. 
Heidelberg, Germany, $1,910,000. 
Heilbronn, Germany, $2,520,000. 
Pirmasens, Germany, $1,630,000. 
Schweinfurt, Germany, $3,930,000. 
Sembach Air Base, Germany, $2,170,000. 
Vilseck, Germany, $6,680,000. 
Sigonella, Italy, $5,360,000. 
Misawa Air Base, Japan, $4,780,000. 
Okinawa, Japan, $300,000. 
Osan Air Base, Korea, $2,780,000. 
Pusan, Korea, $1,540,000. 
Taegu, Korea, $730,000. 
: 
.. 
,;.;..%?< 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 979 
Soesterberg Air Base, Netherlands, $4,460,000. 
Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines, $7,190,000. 
Bicester, United Kingdom, $4,570,000. 
Upwood, United Kingdom, $3,240,000. 
Woodbridge RAF Station, United Kingdom, $1,060,000. 
SEC. 402. FAMILY HOUSING 
The Secretary of Defense may construct or acquire twenty family 
housing units (including land acquisition) at classified installations 
in the total amount of $1,800,000. 
SEC. 403. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS 
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, the Sec-
retary of Defense may make expenditures to improve existing mili-
tary family housing units in an amount not to exceed $110,000. 
TITLE V—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION 
INFRASTRUCTURE 
SEC. 501. AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO MAKE CON-
TRIBUTIONS 
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization infrastructure program as provided in 
section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to 
exceed the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 605 plus 
Post, p. 982. 
the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 
TITLE VI—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AND 
RECURRING ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 
SEC. 601. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Army in the total amount of 
$3,312,803,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United States 
authorized by section 101(a), $1,063,432,000. 
Ante, p. 961. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 101(b), $429,140,000. 
(3) For military construction projects inside the United States 
authorized by section 101 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act, 1985, $26,000,000. 
98 Stat. 1495. 
(4) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 
2805 of title 10, United States Code, $31,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$136,100,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions— 
(A) for construction and acquisition of military family 
housing and facilities, $356,337,000; and 
(B) for support of military family housing (including the 
functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States 
Code), $1,270,794,000, of which not more than $2,520,000 Post, p. 987. 
may be obligated or expended for the leasing of military 
family housing units in the United States, the Common-
99 STAT. 980 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
wealth of Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than 
$131,047,000 may be obligated or expended for the leasing of 
military family housing units in foreign countries. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBUGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated 
to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 
for military construction functions of the Army that remain avail-
able for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to 
the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construction 
Ante, p. 961. 
projects authorized in section 101 in the amount of $291,210,000 
(which includes $82,500,000 for the construction of a utility project 
at Fort Drum, New York, and $56,000,000 for Pershing II security 
upgrade at various locations, Germany). 
(c) 
LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 
AUTHORIZED IN TITLE I.—Notwithstanding the cost variations 
authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any 
other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
carried out under section 101 may not exceed— 
(1) the total amount authorized to be appropriated under 
paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a); 
(2) the amount specified in subsection (b); 
(3) $73,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for the 
construction of the Eastern Distribution Center, New Cum-
berland Army Depot, Pennsylvania); and 
(4) $45,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 
section 101(b) for Pershing II security upgrade at various loca-
tions, Germany). 
SEC. 602. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of 
$2,408,184,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United States 
Ante, p. 966. 
authorized by section 201(a), $1,304,480,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 201(b), $201,185,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 
2805 of title 10, United States Code, $21,560,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$139,260,000. 
(5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for 
construction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 
23, United States Code, $2,960,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions— 
(A) for construction and acquisition of military family 
housing and facilities, $154,000,000; and 
(B) for support of military housing (including functions 
Post, p. 987. 
described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), 
$584,739,000, of which not more than $3,545,000 may be 
obligated or expended for the leasing of military family 
housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than $18,934,000 may 
be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family 
housing units in foreign countries. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167-DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 981 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated 
to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 
for military construction functions of the Navy that remain avail-
able for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, to 
the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construction 
projects authorized in section 201 in the amount of $105,935,000. 
Ante, p. 966. 
(c) 
LIMITATION 
ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS 
AUTHORIZED IN TITLE IL—Notwithstanding the cost variations 
authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any 
other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
carried out under section 201 may not exceed the total amount 
authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsec-
tion (a) and the amount specified in subsection (b). 
SEC. 603. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Air Force in the total amount of 
$2,700,991,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United States 
authorized by section 301(a), $1,147,207,000. 
Ante, p. 972. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 301(b), $415,550,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 
2805 of title 10, United States Code, $22,000,000. 
(4) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$144,096,000. 
(5) For advances to the Secretary of Transportation for 
construction of defense access roads under section 210 of title 
23, United States Code, $30,240,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions— 
(A) for construction and acquisition of military family 
housing and facilities, $212,600,000; and 
(B) for support of military housing (including functions 
described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), 
Post, p. 987. 
$729,298,000, of which not more than $2,711,000 may be 
obligated or expended for the leasing of military family 
housing units in the United States, the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico, and Guam, and not more than $45,402,000 may 
be obligated or expended for the leasing of military family 
housing units in foreign countries. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBUGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated 
to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 
for military construction functions of the Air Force that remain 
available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made available, 
to the extent provided in appropriation Acts, for military construc-
tion projects authorized in section 301 in the amount of $100,000,000. 
(c) 
LIMITATION 
ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 
PROJECTS 
AUTHORIZED IN TITLE III.—Notwithstanding the cost variations 
authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any 
other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
carried out under section 301 may not exceed the total amount 
authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsec-
tion (a) and the amount specified in subsection (b). 
99 STAT. 982 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
SEC. 604. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated 
for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1985, for military 
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing func-
tions of the Department of the Defense (other than the military 
departments), in the total amount of $258,595,000 as follows: 
(1) For military construction projects inside the United States 
Ante, p. 977. 
authorized by section 401(a), $95,149,000. 
(2) For military construction projects outside the United 
States authorized by section 401(b), $104,146,000. 
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects under section 
2805 of title 10, United States Code, $4,000,000. 
(4) For construction projects under the contingency construc-
tion authority of the Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of 
title 10, United States Code, $5,000,000. 
(5) For architectural and engineering services and construc-
tion design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, 
$30,000,000. 
(6) For military family housing functions— 
(A) for construction and acquisition of military family 
housing and facilities, $1,910,000; and 
Post, p. 987. 
(B) for support of military housing (including functions 
described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), 
$18,390,000, of which not more than $14,933,000 may be 
obligated or expended for the leasing of military family 
housing units in foreign countries. 
(b) AUTHORIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Funds appropriated 
to the Department of Defense for fiscal years before fiscal year 1986 
for military construction functions of the Defense Agencies that 
remain available for obligation are hereby authorized to be made 
available, to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, for military 
construction projects authorized in section 401 in the amount of 
$42,025,000. 
(c) 
LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 
AUTHORIZED IN TITLE IV.—Notwithstanding the cost variations 
authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any 
other cost variations authorized by law, the total cost of all projects 
carried out under section 401 may not exceed the total amount 
authorized to be appropriated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsec-
tion (a), the amount specified in subsection (b), and $53,700,000 (the 
balance of the amount authorized for the construction of a research 
and engineering facility at Fort Meade, Maryland). 
SEC. 605. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO 
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1985, for contributions by the Sec-
retary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, 
for the share of the United States of the cost of construction projects 
for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Infrastructure Program, 
Ante, p. 979. 
as authorized by section 501, in the amount of $38,000,000. 
SEC. 606. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS; EXTENSION OF CERTAIN 
PREVIOUS AUTHORIZATIONS 
(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER TWO YEARS.—(1) Except 
as provided in paragraph (2), all authorizations contained in titles I, 
II, III, IV, and V for military construction projects, land acquisition, 
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 983 
NATO Infrastructure Program (and authorizations of appropria-
tions therefor contained in sections 601 through 605) shall expire on 
Ante, pp. 
October 1, 1987, or the date of the enactment of the Military 
979-982. 
Construction Authorization Act for fiscal year 1988, whichever is 
later. 
(2) The provisions of paragraph (1) do not apply to authorizations 
Contracts. 
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 
projects and facilities, and contributions to the NATO Infrastruc-
ture Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for 
which appropriated funds have been obligated before October 1, 
1987, or the date of the enactment of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for fiscal year 1988, whichever is later, for 
construction contracts, land acquisition, family housing projects and 
facilities, or contributions to the NATO Infrastructure Program. 
(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 
1984 
PROJECTS.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 607(a) of the 
Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98-115; 
97 Stat. 780), authorizations for the following projects authorized in 
sections 101, 201,301, and 401 of that Act shall remain in effect until 
97 Stat. 757, 
October 1, 1986, or the date of enactment of the Military Construe- 
'^62, 768, 775. 
tion Authorization Act for fiscal year 1987, whichever is later: 
(1) Consolidated heating system in the amount of $1,850,000 at 
Stuttgart, Germany. 
(2) Consolidated heating system in the amount of $1,750,000 at 
Stuttgart, Germany. 
(3) Range modernization in the amount of $2,450,000 at 
Wildflecken, Germany. 
(4) Unaccompanied personnel housing in the amount of 
$1,400,000 at Argjrroupolis, Greece. 
(5) Operations building in the amount of $370,000 at 
Argjrroupolis, Greece. 
(6) Multipurpose recreation facility in the amoimt of $480,000 
at Argyroupolis, Greece. 
(7) Unaccompanied Officer housing in the amount of $600,000 
at Perivolaki, Greece. 
(8) Operations building in the amount of $410,000 at 
Perivolaki, Greece. 
(9) Multipurpose recreation facility in the amount of $620,000 
at Perivolald, Greece. 
(10) Physical fitness training center in the amount of 
$1,000,000 at Elefsis, Greece. 
(11) Operations control center in the amount of $7,800,000 at 
the Naval Air Station, Brunswick, Maine. 
(12) Engine test cell modifications in the amount of $1,180,000 
at the Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, Florida. 
(13) Land acquisition in the amount of $830,000 at the Naval 
Weapons Station, Concord, California. 
(14) Unaccompanied enlisted personnel housing in the 
amount of $10,000,000 at the Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, 
Florida. 
(15) Electrical distribution lines in the amount of $7,200,000 at 
the Naval Shipyard Mare Islguid, Vallejo, California. 
(16) FamUy housing in the amount of $33,982,000 at RAF 
Upper Hejrford, United Kingdom. 
(17) Air freight terminal in the amount of $10,200,000 at 
Elmendorf, Alaska. 
99 STAT. 984 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
(18) Sewage system in the amount of $2,760,000 at the Naval 
Training Center, Orlando, Florida. 
(19) Physical fitness training center in the amount of 
$1,000,000 at Fort Hunter Liggett, California. 
(20) Child care center in the amount of $3,000,000 at Fort 
Polk, Louisiana. 
(21) Physical fitness training center in the amount of 
$2,200,000 at Sierra Army Depot, California. 
(22) Special Process Laboratories Building in the amount of 
$39,100,000 at Fort Meade, Maryland. 
SEC. 607. ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE 
SPECIFIED BY LAW 
Contracts. 
For projects or contracts initiated during the period beginning on 
the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the 
enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for fiscal 
year 1987 or October 1, 1986, whichever is later, the following 
amounts apply: 
(1) The maximum amount for an unspecified minor military 
construction project under section 2805 of title 10, United States 
Post, p. 989. 
Code, is $1,000,000. 
(2) The amount of a contract for architectural and engineer-
ing services or construction design that makes such a contract 
subject to the reporting requirement under section 2807 of title 
10, United States Code, is $300,000. 
(3) The maximum amount per unit for an improvement 
project for family housing units under section 2825 of title 10, 
United States Code, is $30,000. 
(4) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit 
leased in the United States, Puerto Rico, or Guam under section 
2828(b) of title 10, United States Code, is $10,000. 
(5)(A) The maximum annual rental for a family housing unit 
leased in a foreign country under section 2828(c) of title 10, 
United States Code, is $16,800. 
(B) The maximum number of family housing units that may 
be leased at any one time in foreign countries under section 
2828(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 32,000. 
Real property. 
(6) The maximum rental per year for family housing facilities, 
or for real property related to family housing facilities, leased in 
a foreign country under section 2828(f) of title 10, United States 
Code, is $250,000. 
TITLE VII—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 
SEC. 701. AUTHORIZATION FOR GUARD AND RESERVE FACILITIES 
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
after September 30, 1985, for the costs of acquisition, architectural 
and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard 
and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 
10 use 2231. 
133 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition 
of land for those facilities), the following amounts: 
(1) For the Department of the Army— 
(A) for the Army National Guard of the United States, 
$149,101,000, and 
(B) for the Army Reserve, $70,700,000. 
(2) For the Department of the Navy, for the Naval and Marine 
Corps Reserves, $51,800,000. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 985 
(3) For the Department of the Air Force— 
(A) for the Air National Guard of the United States, 
$139,000,000, and 
(B) for the Air Force Reserve, $70,650,000. 
SEC. 702. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO 
CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL GUARD ARMORIES 
(a) CONTRIBUTIONS TO STATES.—Subsection (e) of section 2233 of 
title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 
"(e) The Secretary of Defense may procure, or contribute to any 
State such amounts as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
procure, architectural and engineering services and construction 
design in connection with facilities to be established or developed 
under this chapter which are not otherwise authorized by law.". 
(b) AMOUNT OF CONTRIBUTION.—Subsection (b) of section 2236 of 
such title is amended to read as follows: 
"(b) A contribution made for an armory under clause (4) or (5) of 
section 2233(a) of this title may not exceed the sum o
f
— 
"(1) 100 percent of the cost of architectural, engineering and 
design services (including advance architectural, engineering 
and design services under section 2233(e) of this title); and 
"(2) a percentage of the cost of construction (exclusive of the 
cost of architectural, engineering and design services) cal-
culated so that upon completion of construction the total 
contribution (including the contribution for architectural, engi-
neering and design services) equals 75 percent of the total cost of 
construction (including the cost of architectural, engineering 
and design services). 
For the purpose of computing the cost of construction under this 
subsection, the amount contributed by a State, territory, the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia, as the 
case may be, may not include the cost or market value of any real 
property that it has contributed.". 
TITLE VIII—GENERAL PROVISIONS 
PART A—MIUTARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM PROVISIONS 
10 use 2236. 
Supra. 
Real property. 
SEC. 801. BUILD-TO-LEASE AND RENTAL GUARANTEE PILOT PROGRAMS 
(a) RENTAL GUARANTEE PROGRAM.—(1) Subsection (h) of section 
802 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (10 U.S.C. 
2821 note), is amended by striking out "September 30, 1985" and 
inserting in lieu thereof "September 30,1986". 
(2) Subsection (g) of such section is amended— 
(A) by inserting "(1)" after "(g)"; and 
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
"(2) In addition to the contracts authorized by subsection (0 and 
paragraph (1) of this subsection, the Secretary of each military 
department may enter into one or more agreements under this 
paragraph for not more than a total of 600 family housing units.". 
(b) BUILD-TO-LEASE PROGRAM.—(1) Paragraph (9) of section 2828(g) 
of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking out "October 
1,1985" and inserting in lieu thereof "September 30,1986". 
(2) Paragraph (8) of such section is amended— 
(A) by inserting "(A)" after "(8)"; and 
Contracts. 
98 Stat. 1521. 
99 STAT. 986 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
98 Stat. 1517, 
1518. 
Regulations. 
98 Stat. 1517, 
1518. 
(B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
Contracts. 
"(B) In addition to the contracts authorized by paragraph (7) and 
subparagraph (A), the Secretary of each military department may 
enter into one or more contracts under this subparagraph for not 
more than a total of 600 family housing units.". 
SEC. 802. FAMILY HOUSING OCCUPANT LIABILITY 
(a) LiABiuTY FOR FAILURE To CLEAN SATISFACTORILY.—Subsection 
(a) of section 2775 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting "(1)" after "(a)"; and 
(2) by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph: 
"(2) A member of the armed forces— 
"(A) who is assigned or provided a family housing unit; and 
"(B) who fails to clean satisfactorily that housing unit (as 
determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of 
Defense or the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the 
Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) 
upon termination of the assignment or provision of that housing 
unit, 
shall be liable to the United States for the cost of cleaning made 
necessary as a result of that failure.". 
(b) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION.—Section 2775 of 
such title is amended— 
(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by inserting after "the Secretary 
of Defense" the following: "and the Secretary of Transportation 
when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the 
Navy"; and 
(2) in subsection (d), by inserting after "or defense agency 
concerned" the following: ", or the operating expenses account 
of the CoEist Guard, as appropriate". 
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Subsection (b) of such section 
is amended by inserting "(in the case of liability under subsection 
(a)(1))" after "including". 
(2) Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended by striking out 
"subsection (a)" and inserting in lieu thereof "subsection (a)(1), or 
the cost of any cleaning made necessary by a failure to clean 
satisfactorily a family housing unit referred to in subsection (a)(2),". 
(3) Subsection (d) of such section is amended by inserting "or 
failure to clean satisfactorily a family housing unit" after "(or the 
equipment or furnishings of a family housing unit)". 
(4) Subsection (e) of such section is amended to read as follows: 
Regulations. 
"(e) The Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Transportation 
when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy, 
shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regula-
tions shall include— 
"(1) regulations for determining the cost of repairs and 
replacements made necessary as the result of abuse or neg-
ligence for which a member is liable under subsection (a)(1); 
"(2) regulations for determining the cost of cleaning made 
necessary as a result of the failure to clean satisfactorily for 
which a member is liable under subsection (a)(2); and 
"(3) provisions for limitations of liability, the compromise or 
waiver of claims, and the collection of amounts owed under this 
section.". 
(d) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows: 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 987 
"§ 2775. Liability of members assigned to military housing". 
(2) The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the 
beginning of chapter 165 of such title is amended to read as follows: 
"2775. Liability of members assigned to military housing.". 
SEC. 803. PREOCCUPANCY TERMINATION COSTS 
Section 2828(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by inserting "(D" after "(d)"; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 
"(2) The Secretary may enter into an agreement under this para- 
Contracts. 
graph in connection with a lease entered into under subsection (c). 
Such an agreement— 
"(A) shall be for the purpose of compensating a developer for 
any costs resulting from the termination of the lease during the 
construction of the housing units that are to be occupied pursu-
ant to the lease; 
"(B) may be for a period not in excess of three years; and 
"(C) shall include a provision that the obligation of the United 
States to make payments under the agreement in any fiscal 
year is subject to the availability of appropriations.". 
SEC. 804. ACTIVITIES INCLUDED WITHIN AUTHORIZATIONS FOR MILITARY 
FAMILY HOUSING 
(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION OF FAMILY HOUSING.—Section 
2821 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new subsection: 
"(d) Amounts authorized by law for construction and acquisition 
of military family housing and facilities include amounts for— 
"(1) minor construction; 
"(2) improvements to existing military family housing units 
and facilities; 
"(3) relocation of military family housing units under section 
2827 of this title; and 
lo use 2827. 
"(4) architectural and engineering services and construction 
design.". 
(b) FAMILY HOUSING SUPPORT.—(1) Chapter 169 of such title is 
amended by adding at the end of subchapter II the following new 
section: 
"§ 2833. Family housing support 
lO use 2833. 
"Amounts authorized by law for support of military family hous- 
Real property. 
ing include amounts for— 
"(1) operating expenses; 
"(2) leasing expenses; 
"(3) maintenance of real property expenses; 
"(4) pa)mients of principal and interest on mortgage debts 
incurred; and 
"(5) payments of mortgage insurance premiums authorized 
under section 222 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 
1715m).". 
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of such 
chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 2832 
the following new item: 
"2833. Family housing support.". 
99 STAT. 988 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
10 use 2667a 
note. 
Effective date. 
10 use 2667a 
note. 
SEC. 805. DOMESTIC FAMILY HOUSING LIMITATIONS 
Section 2828(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by striking out "(3) Not" and inserting in lieu thereof 
"(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), not"; and 
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 
Contracts. 
"(B) During fiscal years 1986 and 1987, the number of housing 
units that may be leased pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph 
(A) may be increased by 500 units for each such fiscal year. The 
Secretary concerned shall provide written notification to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Rep-
resentatives concerning the location, purpose, and cost of the addi-
tional units permitted by this subparagraph. Such notification shall 
be made periodically as the leases are entered into.". 
SEC. 806. SALE-AND-REPLACEMENT TRANSACTIONS 
(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SALE-AND-REPLACEMENT TRANS-
ACTIONS.—(1) Section 807(c) of the Military Construction Authoriza-
tion Act, 1984 (Public Law 98-115; 97 Stat. 786), is amended by 
striking out "October 1,1985" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 
1,1986". 
(2) The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of 
October 1,1985. 
(b) APPROVAL OF TRANSACTIONS.—The Secretary of Defense may 
carry out the following sale-and-replacement transactions under the 
provisions of section 2667a of title 10, United States Code: 
(1) The sale and replacement of warehousing facilities at 
Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. 
(2) The sale and replacement of a noncommissioned officers 
professional education center, a band center, and a combat 
operations center at March Air Force Base, California. 
SEC. 807. TURN-KEY SELECTION PROCEDURES 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end of subchapter III the following new 
section: 
10 use 2862 
"§ 2862. Turn-key selection procedures 
Contracts. 
"(aXD The Secretaries of the military departments, with the 
approval of the Secretary of Defense, may use one-step turn-key 
selection procedures for the purpose of entering into contracts for 
the construction of authorized military construction projects. 
"(2) In this section, 'one-step turn-key selection procedures' means 
procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price 
and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the 
provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and 
construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied 
by the Secretary concerned. 
Prohibition. 
"(b) The Secretary of a military department may not, during any 
fiscal year, enter into more than three contracts for military 
construction projects using procedures authorized by this section. 
"(c) The authority under this section shall expire on October 1, 
1990.". 
O
t
>
) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such subchapter is amended by adding after the item 
relating to section 2861 the following new item: 
"2862. Turn-key selection procedures.". 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 989 
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall 
take effect on October 1,1986. 
SEC. 808. PARTICIPATION IN DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOUSING POOLS 
(a) AUTHORITY TO PARTICIPATE.—Chapter 169 of title 10, United 
States Code (as amended by section 804) is further amended by 
adding at the end of subchapter II the following new section: 
"§ 2834. Participation in Department of State housing pools 
"(a) The Secretary concerned may enter into an agreement with 
the Secretary of State under which the Secretary of State agrees to 
provide housing and related services for personnel under the juris-
diction of the Secretary concerned who are assigned to duty in a 
foreign country if the Secretary concerned determines— 
"(1) that there is a shortage of adequate housing in the area of 
the foreign country in which such personnel are assigned to 
duty; and 
"(2) that participation in the Department of State housing 
pool is the most cost-effective means of providing housing for 
such personnel. 
The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of State, as 
provided in the agreement, for housing and related services fur-
nished personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned. 
"(b) Agreements entered into with the Secretary of State under 
this section may not be executed until (1) the Secretary concerned 
provides to the appropriate committees of Congress written notifica-
tion of the facts concerning the proposed agreement, and (2) a period 
of 21 days has elapsed after the day on which the notification is 
received by the committees. 
"(c) In computing the number of leases for which the maximum 
lease amount may be waived by the Secretary concerned under the 
second sentence of section 2828(eXl) of this title, housing made 
available to the Department of Defense under this section shall be 
included.". 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of such subchapter (as amended by section 804) is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new item: 
"2834. Participation in Department of State housing pools.". 
SEC. 809. UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 
Section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking out "Within" and inserting in 
lieu thereof "Within an amount equal to 125 percent of; and 
(2) in subsection (c), by striking out "Only funds authorized 
for minor construction projects may be used to accomplish 
unspecified minor construction projects, except that the" and 
inserting in lieu thereof "The". 
SEC. 810. ACQUISITION OF INTEREST IN LAND 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2672 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) by striking out "The" at the beginning of such section and 
inserting in lieu thereof "(a) Subject to subsection (b), the"; 
(2) by redesignating clauses (1) and (2) as clauses (A) and (B), 
respectively; 
(3) by striking out "$100,000" each place it appears and 
inserting in lieu thereof "$200,000"; and 
10 use 2862 
note. 
Ante, p. 987. 
10 use 2834. 
Contracts. 
Contracts. 
10 use 2828. 
99 STAT. 990 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Prohibition. 
Contracts. 
10 use 2809. 
Children and 
youth. 
Water. 
10 use 2301 
et seq. 
Prohibition. 
Prohibition. 
(4) by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection: 
"(b) The Secretary of a military department may not enter into a 
contract under this section for the acquisition of any interest in land 
the cost of which exceeds $100,000 unless— 
"(1) the Secretary has notified the appropriate committees of 
Congress of his intent to acquire such interest, the cost of the 
interest, and the reasons for acquiring the interest; and 
"(2) a period of 21 days has elapsed from the date the notifica-
tion is received by the committees.", 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of such section is 
to read as follows: 
"§ 2672. Acquisition: interest in land when cost is not more than 
$200,000". 
(2) The item in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 
159 of such title relating to section 2672 is amended to read as 
follows: 
"2672. Acquisition: interests in land when cost is not more than $200,000.". 
SEC. 811. TEST OF LONG-TERM FACILITIES CONTRACTS 
(a) AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LONG-TERM CONTRACTS.—Chapter 
169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 
of subchapter I the following new section: 
"§ 2809. Test of long-term facilities contracts 
"(a)(1) The Secretary concerned may enter into contracts for the 
construction, management, and operation of facilities on or near 
military installations in the United States for the provision of child 
care services, waste water treatment or depot supply activities in 
cases in which the Secretary concerned determines that the facili-
ties can be more efficiently and more economically provided under 
long-term contracts than bjr other appropriate means. 
"(2) Each contract entered into under subsection (a) shall be 
awarded through the use of competitive procedures as provided in 
chapter 137 of this title. 
"(3) A contract under this section may be for any period not in 
excess of twenty years, excluding the period for construction. A 
contract under this section shall include a provision that the obliga-
tion of the United States to make payments under the contract in 
any fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for 
that purpose. 
"(4) A contract may not be entered into under this section until— 
"(A) the Secretary concerned submits to the appropriate 
committees of the Congress, in writing, a justification of the 
need for the facility for which the contract is to be awarded and 
an economic analysis (based upon accepted life cycle costing 
procedures) which demonstrates that the proposed contract is 
cost effective when compared with alternative means of furnish-
ing the same facility; and 
"(B) a period of 21 calendar days has expired following the 
date on which the justification and the economic analysis are 
received by the committees. 
"(b) Each Secretary concerned may enter into not more than 5 
contracts under the authority of subsection (a) of this section, other 
than contracts for child care centers. 
"(c) The authority to enter into contracts under this section shall 
expire on September 30,1987, but shall not affect the validity of any 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 991 
10 use 2860 
note. 
contract entered into under the authority of this section before that 
date.". 
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the begin-
ning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item: 
"2809. Test of long-term facilities contracts.". 
SEC. 812. AVAILABILITY OF APPROPRIATIONS 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2860 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended— 
(1) in subsection (a), by striking out "(a)" and "and except as 
otherwise provided under subsection (b)"; and 
(2) by striking out subsection O
t
>
)
. 
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 
shall apply to funds appropriated after September 30,1985. 
PART B—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 
SEC. 821. INTERSERVICE EXCHANGES 
Section 2571 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection: 
"(d) No agency or official of the executive branch of the Federal Prohibition. 
Government may establish any regulation, program, or policy or 
take any other action which precludes, directly or indirectly, the 
Secretaries concerned from exercising the authority provided in this 
section.". 
SEC. 822. PLAN FOR CLEANUP OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL 
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall develop and 
transmit to the Congress, by September 1, 1986, a report setting 
forth a comprehensive plan for completing, not later than Septem-
ber 30, 1993, the cleanup of contaminated sites, structures, equip-
ment, and natural resources at or near the Rocky Mountain Arsenal 
near Denver, Colorado. 
(b) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—In such plan, the Secretary shall— 
(1) describe in detail the various phases for the project, along 
with the completion dates and a priority ranking of the goals for 
each such phase; 
(2) provide cost estimates for each such phase and for the total 
project; 
(3) provide findings and conclusions reached as a result of 
consultation, before the transmittal of the plan, with State and 
local officials (including officials of water districts) and the 
general public; 
(4) provide that consultation and coordination with such offi-
cials and the general public will be carried out throughout the 
process of cleaning up the Arsenal; 
(5) provide for priority cleanup of— 
(A) the most seriously contaminated areas at the Arsenal, 
including the areas known as Basin F, Basin A, the South 
Plants Area, and section 36; 
(B) other areas at the Arsenal which should be afforded 
priority treatment for the benefit of the general public, 
including the areas known as sections 7, 8, 11, and 12; and 
(C) any sites, structures, equipment, or natural resources 
located outside the Arsenal that have been contaminated by 
activities carried out at the Arsenal; 
Natural 
resources. 
Hazardous 
materials. 
Waste disposal. 
Report. 
99 STAT. 992 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Grants. 
20 use 241 
note. 
20 use 241. 
(6) provide for the cleanup of the areas described in paragraph 
(5) without regard to whether a final disposal site for hazardous 
substances from the Arsenal has been selected; 
(7) establish, as a priority, the use of waste-treatment tech-
nologies that will reduce significantly the amount and toxicity 
level of hazardous substances at or near the Arsenal; 
(8) provide for selection of a final disposal site for hazardous 
substances from the Arsenal in a manner that will take into 
consideration sites, within and outside of Colorado, that— 
(A) are geologically suitable to serve as such a disposal 
site; and 
(B) are located within areas the governing bodies of which 
have expressed a willingness to have such a disposal site 
located therein; 
(9) provide that all activities in the plan will be carried out in 
compliance with the requirements of applicable Federal and 
State environmental laws; 
(10) provide findings and conclusions reached as a result of 
studying the feasibility and cost of cleansing groundwater on an 
expedited basis at the sources of contamination on the Arsenal; 
and 
(11) include a statement concerning any reprogramming or 
supplemental appropriation of funds that may be necessary for 
fiscal year 1987 in order to assure an expeditious implementa-
tion of the plan. 
SEC. 823. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSISTANCE 
The Secretary of Defense may use funds appropriated to the 
Department of Defense for fiscal year 1986 for planning and design 
purposes to provide planning assistance to local communities if the 
Secretary determines that the financial resources available to the 
community (by grant or otherwise) are inadequate. The Secretary 
may use such funds as follows: 
(1) To assist communities located near newly established 
Light Infantry Division Posts at Fort Drum, New York, and 
Fort Wainwright, Alaska, $500,000. 
(2) To assist communities located near newly established 
homeports under the Naval Strategic Dispersal Program at 
Staten Island, New York, and Everett, Washington, $500,000. 
SEC. 
8
2
4
. 
PLAN 
FOR 
TRANSFER 
OF 
SECTION 
6 
SCHOOLS 
(a) PLAN REQUIREMENT.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 
House of Representatives a plan which provides for the orderly 
transfer, not later than July 1, 1990, of all Section 6 Schools to the 
appropriate local school districts of the States in which such schools 
are located. 
(2) As used in paragraph (1), the term "Section 6 Schools" means 
schools of the Department of Defense established under section 6 of 
Public Law 81-874. 
(b) DEADUNE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—The plan required by 
subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than March 1, 1986. 
SEC. 825. FURNISHING OF BEDDING FOR HOMELESS 
Section 2546 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 993 
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
subsection: 
"(d) The Secretary concerned may provide bedding for support of 
shelters for the homeless that are operated by entities other than 
the Department of Defense. Bedding may be provided under this 
subsection without reimbursement, but may only be provided to the 
extent that the Secretary determines that the provision of such 
bedding will not interfere with military requirements.". 
SEC. 
826. USE OF WATERFRONT FACILITIES AT PORT HUENEME. 
CALIFORNIA 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds received by the 
Navy from its license agreement with the Oxnard Harbor District 
for use, on an as-available basis, of the waterfront facilities at the 
Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, California, 
may be used for operation and maintenance of waterfront facilities 
at that installation. 
SEC. 827. MATERIAL AT NAVAL BASE, NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 
The Secretary of the Navy may provide, without compensation, to 
the City of Norfolk, Virginia, not more than 50,000 cubic yards of 
dredged material located at the Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia, if 
such city agrees to bear all costs and liabilities associated with 
loading, transporting, using, or otherwise handling such material. 
SEC. 828. ALTERATION IN TRAILER PARK EXPANSION, HANSCOM AIR 
FORCE BASE, MASSACHUSETTS 
(a) AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT.—In providing for 
the 
trailer park at Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, and the 
expansion of such park as authorized by section 302 of the Military 
Construction Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 
1508), the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into an agreement 
with the Massachusetts Port Authority to terminate leasehold 
rights of the Department of the Air Force with respect to such 
trailer park in exchange for— 
(1) leasehold rights to other land held by such Authority and 
acceptable to the Secretary; and 
(2) the construction, by such Authority, of roads, utilities, and 
trailer pads on such other land in accordance with specifications 
of the Secretary. 
(b) LIMITATION.—The termination of the leasehold rights by the 
Secretary shall not become effective until the completion of the 
construction described in subsection (a)(2). 
PART C—REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS 
SEC. 
831. LAND CONVEYANCE, DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Recreation. 
TUCSON, ARIZONA 
Health and 
(a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that— 
(1) the highest and best use of the lands described or identified 
in subsection (b) is public park and recreational use or public 
health use; 
(2) the city of Tucson, Arizona, has indicated a willingness to 
extend the existing lease between such city and the Air Force 
for the lands described in subsection (c) for an additional 50 
years commencing in 2002 at the existing rental rate of $773 per 
year; 
medical care. 
99 STAT. 994 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
(3) the Administrator of General Services should— 
(A) assign to the Secretary of the Interior lands described 
in subsection (b)(1) for use as a park or recreational area; 
and 
(B) assign to the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
lands described in subsection (b)(2) for public health use; 
(4) the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretaries of the 
Interior and Health and Human Services, as the case may be, 
should, simultaneously with the acceptance of the extension of 
the lease for the lands described in subsection (c), convey to the 
city of Tucson, Arizona— 
(A) the property described in subsection (b)(1) for use as a 
park or recreational area through a public benefit discount 
conveyance under section 203(kX2) of the Federal Property 
and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 
484(k)(2)); and 
(B) such land as is described in subsection (b)(2) for public 
health use through a public benefit discount conveyance 
under section 203(k)(l)(B) of such Act (40 U.S.C. 484(k)(l)(B)). 
(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND SUITABLE FOR PARK OR RECREATIONAL 
USE AND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH USE.—(1) The property referred to in 
clauses (3)(A) and (4)(A) of subsection (a) is 61 acres of real property 
adjacent to Golf Links/Craycroft Intersection, Davis-Monthan Air 
Force Base, Tucson, Arizona. 
(2) The property referred to in clauses (3)(B) and (4)(B) of subsec-
tion (a) is such portion (not exceeding eight acres) of the land 
described in paragraph (1) as the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services, with the concurrence of the Secretaries of the Interior and 
Defense, determines to be suitable for public health use. 
(c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO LEASE.—The property 
referred to in subsection (a)(2) is 4,348.81 acres of real property 
owned by the city of Tucson, Arizona, at Davis-Monthan Air Force 
Base. 
(d) SURVEYS OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal descrip-
tions of the property to be conveyed under this section shall be 
determined by surveys that are satisfactory to the Secretary of the 
Interior or the Secretaries of the Interior and Health and Human 
Services, as the case may be. The cost of such surveys shall be borne 
by the city of Tucson, Arizona. 
SEC. 832. LAND CONVEYANCE, MARCH AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA 
(a) REMOVAL OF REVERTER.—Section 835 of the Military Construc-
tion Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 1527), is 
amended— 
(1) by striking out subsection (d); and 
(2) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections 
(d), (e), and (f), respectively. 
(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) Subsection (a) of such section is 
amended— 
(A) by striking out "Village West Foundation" and inserting 
in lieu thereof "Air Force Village West"; and 
(B) by striking out " 'Foundation'), of San Bernardino" and 
inserting in lieu thereof " 'Corporation'), of Riverside". 
(2) Subsection (b) and subsections (d) and (f), as redesignated by 
suJbsection (a), of such section are amended by striking out "Foun-
dation" each place it appears and inserting in lieu thereof 
"Corporation". 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 995 
SEC. 833. LAND CONVEYANCE, NAVAL AIR STATION, MIRAMAR, SAN DIEGO, 
CALIFORNIA 
(a) AUTHORITY TO SELL OR EXCHANGE.—The Secretary of the Navy 
(hereafter in this section referred to as the "Secretary") is au-
thorized to sell or exchange approximately 475 acres of land lying 
south of proposed highway SR-52 which comprises a portion of the 
Naval Air Station, Miramar, California. The lands sold or ex-
changed may not include lands authorized to be conveyed under 
section 837 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1985 
(Public Law 98-407; 98 Stat. 1529). 
(b) SALE OR EXCHANGE REQUIREMENT.—The sale or exchange shall 
be conducted in accordance with competitive bidding procedures 
prescribed in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code. In no event 
may the land described in subsection (a) be sold or exchanged for 
less than the fair market value thereof. 
(c) CONSIDERATION.—In consideration for the sale or exchange Housing. 
authorized in subsection (a), the Secretary may accept cash or land 
in the San Diego area, or both. Any land received shall be a suitable 
site (as determined by the Secretary) for military family housing. 
(d) USE OF FUNDS.—(1) The Secretary is authorized to use any Housing. 
proceeds from the sale of lands made under this section solely for 
the purpose of acquiring in the San Diego area a suitable site for 
military family housing. 
(2) Any funds received by the Secretary under this section and not 
used for the acquisition of a site for military family housing within 
30 months after the receipt of such funds shall be deposited into the 
general fund of the Treasury. 
(e) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property sold or exchanged under this section 
shall be in accordance with surveys that are satisfactory to the 
Secretary. 
(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary may require such addi-
tional terms and conditions under this section as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
SEC. 834. LAND CONVEYANCE, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 
(a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the 
Secretary of the Air Force (hereafter in this section referred to as 
the "Secretary") is authorized to convey to the United States Olym-
pic Committee, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to the approximately 3.98 acres of land 
(together with improvements thereon) near Colorado Springs, Colo-
rado, which are occupied by such Committee under a lease entered 
into by the Secretary with such Committee pursuant to section 806 
of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1980 (Public Law 
96-125; 93 Stat. 949). 
(b) CONDITIONS.—The conveyance described in subsection (a) shall 
be subject— 
(1) to the condition that the property conveyed shall be used 
by the United States Olympic Committee solely for activities of 
such Committee; 
(2) to the condition that if the property conveyed is not used 
for the purpose described in clause (1), all right, title, and 
interest in and to the property shall revert to the United States, 
which shall have the right of immediate entry thereon; and 
(3) to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary consid-
ers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
99 STAT. 996 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Veterans. 
Cemetery. 
38 u s e 1000 
et seq. 
Prohibition. 
96 Stat. 1575. 
(c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal description 
of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be deter-
mined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of 
the survey shall be borne by such Committee. 
SEC. 835. LAND TRANSFER, NAVAL AIR STATION, PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 
(a) TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the Navy shall transfer, without 
reimbursement, to the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs a tract of 
land consisting of approximately 15.31 acres, together with improve-
ments thereon, at the Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida. 
(b) USE OF LAND.—The real property transferred pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall become part of the Barrancas National Cemetery 
and shall be administered by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs 
as part of the National Cemetery System under chapter 24 of title 
38, United States Code. 
(c) CONDITION.—If the real property transferred pursuant to 
subsection (a) is not used for the purpose described in subsection (b), 
the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs shall transfer such property, 
without reimbursement, to the Secretary of the Navy. 
(d) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal descrip-
tion of the property to be transferred under subsection (a) shall be 
determined by a survey approved by the Secretary. 
SEC. 836. AVIGATION RIGHTS ON SANTA ROSA ISLAND, FLORIDA 
The Act entitled "An Act to authorize the Secretary of the Army 
to sell and convey to Okaloosa County, State of Florida, all right, 
title, and interest in the United States in and to a portion of Santa 
Rosa Island, Florida, and for other purposes", approved July 2,1948 
(62 Stat. 1229), is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow-
ing new section: 
"SEC. 5. The prohibition contained in subdivision d. of the first 
section against the erection of any structure or obstacle on the land 
conveyed under this Act in excess of seventy-five feet above mean 
low-water level shall be deemed to be a prohibition against the 
erection of a structure or obstacle in excess of two hundred feet 
above mean low-water level in the case of that portion of such land 
on Santa Rosa Island which is east of the Destin East Pass and 
known as Holiday Isle.". 
SEC. 837. TERMINATION DATE FOR CERTAIN LAND CONVEYANCE AUTHOR-
ITY AT EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA 
Section 808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1983 
(Public Law 97-321; 98 Stat. 1575), is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection: 
"(d) The authority of the Secretary under this section shall termi-
nate on October 1,1990.". 
SEC. 838. LAND EXCHANGE, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 
(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (b) through (f), the Sec-
retary of the Navy (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
"Secretary") is authorized to convey to the NEW MET Company 
(hereafter in this section referred to as the "Company") all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in and to approximately 39.5 
acres of unimproved land comprising a portion of the Naval Station, 
Mayport, Florida, located adjacent to the Ribault Bay Village Navy 
housing area. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 997 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—In consideration for the conveyance by the 
Secretary under subsection (a), the Company shall convey to the 
United States a parcel of land consisting of approximately 31.7 acres 
located in the vicinity of the Ribault Bay Village Navy housing area. 
(c) OBUGATIONS OF PARTIES.—The specific obligations of the Sec-
retary and the Company shall be those set forth in a memorandum 
of understanding between the parties dated February 19, 1985, 
(d) PAYMENT BY THE COMPANY.—If the fair market value of the 
land conveyed to the Company under subsection (a) exceeds the fair 
market value of the land conveyed to the United States under 
subsection (b), as determined by the Secretary, the Company shall 
pay the difference to the United States. 
(e) SURVEY.—The exact acreages and legal descriptions of the 
lands to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by 
surveys which are satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of any such 
survey shall be borne by the Company. 
(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may re-
quire such additional terms and conditions in connection with the 
transaction authorized by this section as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 
SEC. 839. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON, MONTANA 
(a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec-
retary of the Army (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
"Secretary") is authorized to convey, without consideration, to the 
State of Montana all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to approximately 65.4 acres of unimproved land located in the 
southeast comer of Fort William H. Harrison, Montana, and pres-
ently under license to the State of Montana for National Guard use. 
(b) CONDITIONS.—(1) The conveyance authorized by subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the property conveyed by the 
Secretary be used by the State to establish a State veterans' 
cemetery. 
(2) If the property conveyed pursuant to subsection (a) is not used 
for the purposes described in paragraph (1), all right, title, and 
interest in and to such property shall revert at no cost to the United 
States, which shall have the right of immediate entry thereon. 
(3) The Secretary shall reserve to the United States in the prop-
erty conveyed by the Secretary a waterline easement for use by the 
Veterans' Administration Hospital near Fort William H. Harrison. 
(c) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) and 
of the easement to be reserved under subsection (bX3) shall be 
determined by surveys that are satisfactory to the Secretary. The 
cost of such surveys shall be borne by the State. 
(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may re-
quire such other terms and conditions with respect to the convey-
ance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests 
of the United States. 
SEC. 840. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORT JACKSON, SOUTH CAROLINA 
(a) AUTHORITY TO SELL.—Subject to subsections (b) through (g), the 
Secretary of the Army (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
"Secretary") may sell all or any portion of that tract of land which 
comprises a portion of Fort Jackson, South Carolina, known as the 
Gregg Circle Area, consisting of 300 acres more or less. 
Veterans. 
Cemetery. 
99 STAT. 998 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
Contracts. 
(b) CONDITIONS OF SALE.—Before the Secretary enters into a con-
tract for the sale of all or a portion of the property referred to in 
subsection (a), the prospective buyer shall be required— 
(1) to submit to the Secretary a master plan for the develop-
ment of the land that is acceptable to both the Secretary and 
the appropriate officials of the city of Columbia, South Carolina; 
and 
(2) at the option of the Secretary, to enter into an agreement 
with the Secretary under which the prospective buyer agrees 
that if all or a portion of the land referred to in subsection (a) is 
conveyed to the buyer, the buyer will be required— 
Housing. 
(A) to construct, at the option of the Secretary, on a 
portion of the land to be conveyed or on a portion of the 
land not conveyed up to 400 units of family housing in 
accordance with specifications and standards prescribed by 
the Secretary at the time the land is offered for sale; 
(B) to have the housing units ready for occupancy not 
later than 2 years after the date of the conveyance of such 
land to the prospective buyer; and 
(C) at the option of the Secretary— 
(i) lease the housing units to the Army pursuant to 
section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code; or 
(ii) set aside the housing units for military personnel 
in exchange for a guarantee by the Secretary of the 
rental of the set-aside housing units in accordance with 
section 802 of the Military Construction Authorization 
Act, 1984 (10 U.S.C. 2821 note). 
(c) COMPETITIVE BID REQUIREMENT; MINIMUM SALE PRICE.—(1) The 
sale of any of the land referred to in subsection (a) shall be carried 
out under publicly advertised, competitively bid, or competitively 
negotiated contracting procedures. 
(2) In no event may any of the land referred to in subsection (a) be 
sold for less than its fair market value. 
(d) REPORT REQUIREMENTS.—(1) The Secretary may not enter into 
any contract for the sale of any or all of the land referred to in 
subsection (a) unless— 
(A) the Secretary has submitted a report to the appropriate 
committees of Congress containing the information required in 
section 2828(g)(6)(A) of title 10, United States Code; and 
(B) a period of 21 days has expired following the date on which 
the economic report referred to in such section is received by 
those committees. 
(2) Any report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include— 
(A) a description of the price and terms of the proposed sale; 
(B) a description of the procedures used in selecting a buyer 
for the land; and 
(C) all pertinent information regarding the family housing to 
be made available for military personnel under this section. 
(e) USE OF PROCEEDS OF SALE.—(1) The Secretary may use the 
proceeds from the sale of any of the land referred to in subsection 
( a ) -
Housing. 
(A) to provide for military family housing for military person-
nel stationed at Fort Jackson in the manner prescribed in 
subsection (b)(2) or in such other manner as the Secretary may 
prescribe; 
98 Stat. 1521. 
Contracts. 
Prohibition. 
Prohibition. 
Contracts. 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
99 STAT. 999 
(B) to provide for security and access routes to facilities at 
Fort Jackson for military personnel housed or to be housed in 
the housing units to be constructed on such land; and 
(C) to construct necessary facilities for up to 100 mobile trailer 
home sites at Fort Jackson. 
(2) Any proceeds of the sale not used for such purposes shall be 
covered into the general fund of the Treasury. 
(f) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of the land to be conveyed under this section shall be 
determined by a survey approved by the Secretary. 
(g) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary may require such addi-
tional terms and conditions in connection with any transaction 
authorized by this section as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
protect the interests of the United States. 
(h) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The military family housing au-
thorized under this section is in addition to any military family 
housing otherwise authorized by law. 
SEC. 841. LAND CONVEYANCE, NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, CHARLESTON, 
SOUTH CAROLINA 
(a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—Subject to subsections (b) through (h), 
the Secretary of the Navy (hereafter in this section referred to as 
the "Secretary") is authorized to convey to the Westvaco Corpora-
tion of New York (hereafter in this section referred to as the 
"Corporation") all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to approximately 47.83 acres of land, together with improve-
ments thereon, which comprise that portion of the Navy Weapons 
Station, Charleston, South Carolina, located at Remount Road and 
Virginia Avenue. 
(b) CONSIDERATION.—In consideration for the conveyance au-
thorized by subsection (a), the Corporation shall— 
(1) pay for the cost of construction of suitable replacement 
facilities to be constructed in a manner and at a site determined 
by the Secretary; 
(2) pay for the cost of removing any existing improvements on 
the replacement site; and 
(3) pay for the cost of relocating from the facilities located on 
the land to be conveyed by the Secretary to the replacement 
facilities. 
(c) AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS.—The Secretary is authorized to 
receive, obligate, and disburse any funds received under subsection 
(b) to cover design, construction, relocation and related costs speci-
fied in the memorandum of understanding referred to in subsection 
(d). 
(d) OBUGATIONS OF PARTIES.—The specific obligations of the Sec-
retary and the Corporation shall be those set forth in a memoran-
dum of understanding between the parties that became effective 
April 17,1985. 
(e) VACATING PROPERTY.—Upon completion and occupancy of the 
replacement facilities by the Navy and payment of all costs by the 
Corporation, the Navy shall promptly vacate the property described 
in subsection (a) and convey the property by quitclaim deed to the 
Corporation. 
(f) PAYMENT OF ANY EXCESS.—If the fair market value of the 
property conveyed under subsection (a) exceeds the consideration 
paid under subsection (b), as determined by the Secretary, the 
Corporation shall pay the difference to the United States. 
Housing. 
99 STAT. 1000 
PUBLIC LAW 99-167—DEC. 3, 1985 
(g) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The exact acreage and legal 
description of any land conveyed under this section shall be deter-
mined by a survey which is satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of 
such survey shall be borne by the Corporation. 
(h) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary may require such addi-
tional terms and conditions under this section as the Secretary 
considers appropriate to protect the interest of the United States. 
SEC. 842. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 
Colleges and 
(a) FoRT MCNAIR.—The Administrator of General Services shall 
universities. 
transfer approximately 10.5 acres of surplus land adjacent to Fort 
McNair, Washington, D.C., to the Secretary of the Army, without 
reimbursement, for use by the Secretary in connection with the 
National Defense University. 
(b) ARLINGTON HALL STATION.—Upon the relocation of the Army 
Intelligence and Security Command and other Defense activities 
from Arlington Hall Station to new quarters, the Secretary of the 
Army shall transfer approximately 72 acres of the tract of land 
known as Arlington Hall Station, together with improvements 
thereon, to the Secretary of State, without reimbursement, to be 
used as a center for the training and instruction of personnel in the 
field of foreign relations, as authorized by chapter 7 of the Foreign 
Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4021-4026), and for such other pur-
poses as the Secretary of State may consider appropriate. 
Approved December 3, 1985. 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1042 (H.R. 1409): 
HOUSE REPORTS: No. 99-128 accompanying H.R. 1409 (Comm. on Armed Services) 
and No. 99-366 (Comm. of Conference). 
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 131 (1985): 
June 5, considered and passed Senate. 
Oct. 16, H.R. 1409 considered and passed House; S. 1042, amended, passed in 
lieu. 
Nov. 12, Senate agreed to conference report. 
Nov. 19, House agreed to conference report.