Clinical trial NCT04562636: Evaluating a Messaging Campaign in the United States
Official title: Evaluating a Messaging Campaign in the United States
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Obesity
Heart Diseases
Cancer
Keywords: Red meat
Processed meat
Sustainability
Meat reduction
Lead sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Wellcome Trust
First posted: 2020-09-24
Enrollment: 1244
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Purpose: To evaluate reactions to and opinions of a messaging campaign.

Participants: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels and will be US-based adults (18 years old and older) who consumed red meat in the past 30 days.

Procedures (methods): After completing a screening question about meat consumption, participants will review a consent form. If they select to participate in the study, participants will be randomly assigned to view control messages, red meat-related environment messages, or red meat-related health messages. They will be asked a series of questions about these messages.

Participants will also be asked about grocery shopping preferences and standard demographics questions.

Detailed description: Excess consumption of red and processed meat is a growing problem, especially in the United States where meat is consumed more than three times the global average. Epidemiological evidence for the association between excess meat intake and negative health outcomes (such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes) as well as negative environmental impacts (such as pollution, overuse of resources, and carbon emissions) indicates that reducing meat consumption should be particularly pertinent to researchers and other public health professionals.

The potential of using widespread communication campaigns, such as Meatless Monday, to reduce meat consumption by educating individuals on the associated health and environmental risks appears to be promising. However, the current literature is missing information regarding what types of messages are most effective (e.g. negative environmental messages vs. negative health messages). To address this knowledge gap, our study will collect quantitative data in measurable outcomes to understand effectiveness and comprehension of environmental messages and health messages to reduce meat consumption.

Setting: This is an online study using Qualtrics, so this research does not involve talking to human participants.

Recruitment: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels, a survey research firm through which participants voluntarily sign up to participate in research studies.

Informed Consent: Participants will read a written consent document that includes information about the study's purpose, expectations, and possible risks and benefits. Participants will acknowledge that they have read and agreed to the terms by clicking forward.

Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) control (about checking their credit score), 2) environment-focused Meatless Monday messages, or 3) health-focused Meatless Monday messages.

Assessment: Using an online platform (Qualtrics), participants will answer a screening question about red meat consumption. If they are eligible (consumption of red meat 1 time per week or more), they will proceed to the main study after reading and agreeing to the written consent form. Participants will then answer two questions about their belief in climate change. Participants will then view four messages in their ascribed conditions. After viewing all 4 messages, participants will answer a series of questions about the messages they viewed. Then, participants will answer a series of demographic questions. Participants will also answer questions about grocery shopping preferences.

Detailed description of the trial arms: This study is a three-armed between subjects' design. Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages either about the environmental harms of meat production (intervention), the health harms of meat consumption (intervention), or about checking their credit score (control). The environmental and health harms messages were obtained from existing publicly available messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Be 18 years or older
* Be able to read and speak English
* Be able to take a computer survey in English
* Currently reside in the United States
* Consumed red meat in the past 30 days

Exclusion Criteria:

* Non red-meat eater

Primary outcomes:
measure: Perceived Message Effectiveness (PME)
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Attention
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
measure: Negative affect
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
measure: Cognitive elaboration
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
measure: Social interactions
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
measure: Intention to reduce meat consumption
timeFrame: ~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chapel Hill
country: United States
facility: Carolina Population Center
state: North Carolina
Study officials:
affiliation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
name: Hannah Rayala
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
name: Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References: