Clinical trial NCT03743337: Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings
Official title: Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Conditions: Early Childhood Professional Development
Keywords: Infant-toddler care
Early child development
Professional development
Lead sponsor: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Department of Health and Human Services
name: Child Trends
name: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
First posted: 2018-11-16
Enrollment: 310
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: OTHER
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Early care and education (ECE) center directors, professional development coaches and coach supervisors, center-based teachers, and family child care (FCC) providers.

Brief summary: Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. The goal of this information collection is to learn how the prevalence, implementation, combination, and tailoring of core features of professional development coaching for early care and education (ECE) providers vary across ECE classrooms and family child care (FCC) homes serving children supported by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies or in settings that receive Head Start grants. The investigators will conduct three data collection activities. First, the investigators will collect information on coaching taking place in different states in winter 2018 from state-level entities. Second, the investigators will conduct one round of survey data collection with ECE center directors, coaches, teachers, and FCC providers in winter 2019 through spring 2019. Third, the investigators will conduct case studies to better understand factors that influence the coaching approaches identified through the survey data collection. The case studies will include semi-structured interviews, a coaching session observation, and collection of coaching logs. The case studies will occur in spring 2020.

Detailed description: This study aims to advance understanding of implementation of core features of coaching in ECE classrooms, and how features may vary by key contextual factors and implementation drivers. This study will focus on coaching used for delivering professional development services to ECE teachers and FCC providers to improve knowledge and practice in center-based classrooms and FCC homes serving preschool-age children. At the classroom/teacher level, the approach to coaching can vary by dosage, content, activities (e.g., assessment, observation, goal-setting, modeling, reflection), materials (e.g., video, written plans, resource documents) and other features. However, there is no consensus as to which of these features are core to the practice of coaching. Additionally, little is known about how these features of coaching are implemented, combined, and tailored to the needs of teachers or how contextual factors or implementation drivers may mediate or moderate the effects of coaching. Ultimately, SCOPE findings will improve coaching practice in the ECE field and determine which coaching features are ripe for more rigorous evaluation.

Descriptive Study: The investigators will carry out a descriptive study in a sample of seven states. Sampled states will have one or more classroom-based coaching models offered to centers and FCC homes that are serving preschool-age children and that receive Head Start grants or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies. All of the data that will be collected are listed below.

1. State coaching informant interviews: To obtain information about coaching approaches and about the available administrative data on coaching, including the range of coaching providers and approaches occurring in states and what ECE settings may be receiving classroom coaching. As part of this process, we will also seek existing administrative data on coaching processes and participants.
2. ECE setting eligibility screening: To obtain information on the characteristics of the ECE setting, the coaching taking place in that setting, and characteristics of participants in coaching; and to determine if a setting is eligible for survey data collection and if personnel are willing to participate in the study
3. Surveys for the descriptive study:

   * A center director survey - To collect information on the center context, supports for and challenges to coaching and professional development, and structural and process features of coaching
   * A coach survey - To collect information on coach characteristics, supports for and challenges to coaching, and process and structural features of coaching
   * A teacher/FCC provider survey- To collect information on teacher and FCC provider characteristics, supports for coaching, structural and process features of coaching, coaching outputs (such as attitudes and beliefs), and the FCC context

Case Studies: The investigators will also conduct case studies in twelve ECE settings (centers and FCC homes) selected from the seven states; some of the settings may have participated in the descriptive study and others may not have. Site visit data collection for the case studies will consist of the following activities:

1. Semi-structured interviews with center directors, teachers/FCC providers, coaches, and coach supervisors. To collect information on how decisions are made about coaching and what features are included; supports for coaching; organizational context and climate for coaching (e.g., organizational culture, philosophies, staffing and turnover, languages and cultures of families served); individual experiences as part of the coaching process; barriers/supports for coaching
2. Teacher/FCC provider survey: The teachers and FCC providers in the case studies will be asked to complete the descriptive study teacher/FCC provider survey.
3. Collection of coaching logs (whenever available): To provide information on the frequency of interactions between teachers/FCC providers and coaches, the focus of these interactions, and the coaching strategies employed. The coaching logs are preexisting materials used by some coaches when they provide coaching to teachers.
4. Coaching session observations: To provide information on the process features of coaching (coaching activities and relationship-building activities); structural features (target of coaching and content); and outputs (teacher/FCC provider engagement, actual dosage, and perceptions of the coach-teacher/FCC provider relationship)

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Currently operating licensed or license exempt child care setting
2. Receiving funding from a Head Start grant and/or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies
3. Currently receiving classroom-based coaching for teachers of preschoolers/FCC providers caring for preschoolers.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Does not meet the inclusion criteria

Primary outcomes:
measure: Coaching experienced by teachers/family child care providers
timeFrame: Up to 6 months
measure: Coaching delivered by professional development coaches
timeFrame: Up to 6 months
measure: Context in which coaching takes place/influences on the coaching process
timeFrame: Up to 6 months
measure: Director perspectives external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
timeFrame: Up to 3 months
measure: Coaching participant perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
timeFrame: Up to 3 months
measure: Coach perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
timeFrame: Up to 3 months
measure: Coach supervisor perspectives on external factors that influence the implementation of coaching
timeFrame: Up to 3 months
measure: Content of coaching interactions
timeFrame: Up to 90 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Washington
country: United States
facility: Mathematica
state: District of Columbia
Study officials:
affiliation: Mathematica Policy Research
name: Emily Moiduddin, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: Mathematica Policy Research
name: Sally Atkins-Burnett, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: