Clinical trial NCT01883232: The Efficacy of Analgesic Buffering With Sodium Bicarbonate for the Pediatric Dental Patient
Official title: The Efficacy of Analgesic Buffering With Sodium Bicarbonate for the Pediatric Dental Patient
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Pediatric Dentistry
Lead sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2013-06-21
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 5
Maximum age (years): 12
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: As a dentist, administering anesthetic to patients, especially children, proves to be one of the most difficult parts of a procedure. Pain is one of the most common symptom in dentistry, and a serious concern for the dentist. The pain of the local anesthetic injection has several causes. Of the many reasons for pain at the site of injection, the acidity of the solution is thought to be most important. This study will be measuring the effects of adding sodium bicarbonate (buffer) to local anesthetic during dental procedures. This is commonly used in medical applications but is not widely used in the dental setting. Using this biochemistry and human physiology, one can predict when buffering the lidocaine injection, a quicker response in analgesia and a decrease in pain during administration. I will be measuring the effect using several measuring devices to gauge if buffering the local anesthetic will benefit the pediatric dental patient by reducing the time it takes for the analgesic effect as well as decreasing the pain during administration. Along with time, I will be using the Wong-Baker Scale to assess the pain. This scale is standard protocol for assessing pain in the pediatric population. The pediatric dental population has aversions to dental procedures because of the associated pain produced from most procedures. If limiting the time it takes for the analgesic to take effect and decrease the pain altogether, the pediatric patient will be less likely to skip treatment therefore, increase dental health.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Current patients of Children's Hospital Colorado Dental Clinic
* Existence of carious primary molars necessitating administration of an anesthetic agent
* No history of post traumatic stress disorder or specific phobia related to a dental setting
* No allergic reaction to lidocaine
* Patient's between the ages of 5 to 12.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Allergies to local anesthetics or sulfites
* History of significant medical conditions
* Taking any medications that may affect anesthetic assessment
* Active sites of pathology in areas if injection
* Outside the age range of 5 -12.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in pain rating using the Wong-Baker scale
timeFrame: During injection (about 5 minutes)
measure: Time it takes for buffered injection to take effect measured in minutes.
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Aurora
country: United States
facility: Children's Hospital Colorado Dental Clinic
state: Colorado
Study officials:
affiliation: Children's Hospital Colorado Dental Clinic
name: Valerie Esker, DMD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;49(8):e72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068. Epub 2011 May 18.
citation: Grassick P. The fear behind the fear: a case study of apparent simple injection phobia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;21(4):281-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(90)90030-o.
citation: Arndt KA, Burton C, Noe JM. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Nov;72(5):676-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198311000-00017.
citation: Meit SS, Yasek V, Shannon CK, Hickman D, Williams D. Techniques for reducing anesthetic injection pain: an interdisciplinary survey of knowledge and application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Sep;135(9):1243-50. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0399.
citation: Burns CA, Ferris G, Feng C, Cooper JZ, Brown MD. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043.
citation: Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):127-36; quiz 137. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.
citation: Malamed SF, Falkel M. Advances in local anesthetics: pH buffering and dissolved CO2. Dent Today. 2012 May;31(5):88-93; quiz 94-5. No abstract available.
citation: Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
citation: Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injection by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):33-40.