Clinical trial NCT03493659: The Effects of Standing Tutorials on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Among Undergraduate Students
Official title: The Effects of Standing Tutorials on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Among Undergraduate Students
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Problem-Based Learning
Keywords: Standing
Sitting
Learning
Problem-Based Learning
Undergraduate
Lead sponsor: Maastricht University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2018-04-10
Enrollment: 96
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Participants are assigned to either a sitting or a standing tutorial, where their learning will be measured.
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: Problem-based learning (PBL) is an education model utilized by Maastricht University and many other universities worldwide. PBL occurs in small, collaborative tutorials, under the facilitation of a tutor. This study explores the effects of standing tutorials, compared against sitting tutorials, on PBL among undergraduate students. A quantitative approach will be taken to objectively measure students' learning, and a qualitative approach will be taken to obtain a deeper understanding of the processes of learning.

It is hypothesized that students in the standing tutorials will be able to recall more academic concepts and link the concepts better than students in the sitting tutorials (H1). Audio-recording of the tutorials will be used to measure the discussions within the tutorials. The transcriptions obtained from the recording will be studied through text analysis. It is hypothesized that students in the standing tutorials will produce more discussions, and therefore a higher word count (H2). It is also hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will use more word categories that are conducive to the discussion and learning process (H3).

Through the qualitative approach, the content of the transcriptions will be analysed through a thematic analysis. It is hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will produce more learning-oriented interactions (H4).

Two additional factors that would be measured are subsequent physical activity and academic achievement. ActivPAL accelerometers will be used to measure the students' daily activity, to find out if the students' daily activities are affected by the standing tutorials, for example, students may sit more as a result of fatigue from the standing tutorials, or conversely transfer the active behaviour from the standing tutorials to other activities outside the tutorial group.It is hypothesized that standing tutorials do not affect the students' subsequent physical activity, and therefore there will be no significant differences of daily activity between students in the sitting and standing tutorials (H5). With regards to academic achievement, it is hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will have higher academic achievements after the course compared to the students in the sitting tutorials (H6).


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Matriculated undergraduate students of Maastricht University
* Students who have given their consent to participate in this study.
* The course subject is well-established and mandatory for all students within the specific bachelor's programme. A well-established course will be chosen so that clear scoring is possible on the concept tests (explained in the Materials and Analysis sections) that will be administered to the students. The course should be mandatory for all students within the bachelor's programme so as to reduce the selection bias that may otherwise occur if we decide to select tutorial groups that only specific groups of students signed up for. An example of a well-established and mandatory course for students in the Biomedical Sciences bachelor's programme at Maastricht University would include 'Brain, behaviour and movement, 'Human genetics, reproduction and prenatal development' and so on.
* The course coordinators and tutors who are the gatekeepers of the students would have given their permission and cooperation in planning the study into the tutorials.
* The duration of the course would last at least 10 tutorial classes.
* The duration of each tutorial is 2 hours.
* The timing of the tutorial groups will have to be similar to minimize any effects arising due to tests being carried out at different times of the day.
* The course is taught in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

* For the standing tutorials, those who are suffering from musculoskeletal discomfort or pathologies that may prevent or influence movement
* Non-matriculated student of Maastricht University
* Non-matriculated student of the chosen course for the study

Primary outcomes:
measure: Process of Learning
timeFrame: 1 hour
measure: Outcome of Learning
timeFrame: 10 minutes
measure: Academic Achievement
timeFrame: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change of Subsequent Physical Activity
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Other outcomes:
measure: Attendance
timeFrame: Less than 5 minutes (recorded by tutor, as required by the course, even without this intervention study)
measure: Tutor Rating
timeFrame: Less than 5 minutes
measure: Search, Preparing and Reporting Phase Questionnaire
timeFrame: 5 minutes
measure: Group Interaction Questionnaire
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Locations:
city: Maastricht
country: Netherlands
facility: Maastricht University
state: Limburg
Study officials:
References: