Clinical trial NCT06406907: Effects of Short Duration Blood Flow Restriction Training on Musculoskeletal and Performance Outcomes
Official title: Effects of Short Duration Blood Flow Restriction Training on Musculoskeletal and Performance Outcomes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Blood Flow Restriction Training
Keywords: Blood flow restriction
Surface EMG
Reactive strength index
Abdominal muscles
Lead sponsor: Riphah International University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-05-09
Enrollment: 50
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 30
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: Effects of short duration blood flow restriction training on musculoskeletal and performance outcomes.

Detailed description: Often after 40 years of age due to decrease in physical activity, muscle strength and performance starts gradually declining. However, regular resistance training can decelerate age related decline in musculoskeletal system and it is considered a major contributing factor in optimizing health and longevity. The beneficial effects of resistance training include decreased resting blood pressure, improved lipid profiles, improved glucose metabolism, improved bone mineral density, decreased lower back pain, enhanced flexibility, increased resting metabolic rate, improved maximal aerobic capacity and alleviated symptoms of arthritis.

According to American College of Sports Medicine, at least loads \>70% of an individual's one-repetition maximum (1RM) are required to maintain muscle mass and strength. Exercises done with heavy loads of more than \>70% of individual 1RM are sometimes referred to traditional resistance training or high-load resistance training (HLRT). However, it is worth mentioning that HLRT may not be suitable for specific populations due to the excessive mechanical stress during exercises on joints and ligaments which may lead to injury. These populations may include novices, individuals recovering from an injury or suffering from chronic diseases, those with disabled limbs as well as the elderly who cannot endure the continual high mechanical stress caused by heavy resistance training.

Alternative training methods to HLRT exists that do not put excessive mechanical loads on the musculoskeletal system, yet can lead to increased muscle mass and strength. One such training method is called blood flow restriction training (BFRT).

In recent years, low load resistance training (\< 40% 1RM) combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) has gained much attention as a feasible alternative to HLRT for maintaining or improving muscle mass and strength.

BFR is usually accomplished by inflating a pneumatic cuff or specially designed elastic bands around the most proximal region of the upper and/or lower limbs. Training loads are usually between 20%-40% 1-RM, 75 repetitions per exercise (15- 30 repetitions per set) or sets to failure. During BFRT pressure is applied in such a way that only venous return is blocked while maintaining arterial inflow to the muscles. It causes hypoxia within the muscles. When exercise is performed with BFR, there is an increase in intramuscular pressure beneath the cuff, which further disturbs the blood flow.

Although the use of BFRT seems very enticing and a viable alternative to HLRT but the mechanisms underpinning the hypertrophic adaptations are yet to be fully determined. Over the years numerous theories have been put forth but general consensus of scientific community is that during BFRT, metabolic stress from vascular occlusion and mechanical tension from resistance training may lead to synergistic increases in muscle hypertrophy and strength. At a cellular level, metabolites accumulation like lactate and reactive oxygen species, hormonal differences, cell-to-cell signaling, cellular swelling, and intracellular signaling pathways have all been proposed.

Metabolites, which accumulate during exercise that are known mediators of muscular hypertrophy, are amplified by BFR's relative ischemic and hypoxic conditions. They are believed to induce earlier, peripherally mediated fatigue, resulting in greater motor unit recruitment, as suggested by the fact that BFRT has similar recruitment to that of HLRT. In addition, type II fast-twitch muscle fibers are activated during BFRT.

The benefits of BFRT may also be partially explained by the proliferation and activation of satellite cells (multipotent cells within muscle connective tissue responsible for muscle growth and regeneration) due to increased production of reactive oxygen species such as nitric oxide results from fluctuations in oxygen availability.

BFRT can be performed in either low frequency or high frequency. For low frequency, it is recommended to perform BFRT 2-3 times per week and the intervention lasts longer than three weeks. For high frequency, it is recommended to perform BFRT less than 3 weeks 1-2 times per day. High-frequency BFRT can be potentially useful for clinicians since the technique can provide positive physiological adaptations in short terms.

There are numerous studies conducted on short duration high frequency (\<3 weeks intervention) BFRT. The duration of the intervention ranges between 1-3 weeks and frequency of training sessions ranges from 6-16 sessions per week to 24 sessions in 3 weeks. Short duration BFRT studies have positive effects on muscle strength, muscle size, performance, hormonal levels, inflammatory marks and satellite cells. However, there are still research gaps that needs to be addressed.

Difference between the effects of varied frequency short duration BFRT protocols i.e., high frequency vs low frequency on musculoskeletal and performance outcomes is still unclear. Furthermore, limited studies have been conducted on the effect of BFRT on muscles proximal to the BFR site. Often the studies have focused on chest and shoulder muscles but have reported conflicting results. One study assessed the effects of lower limb BFRT on trunk muscles (gluteus maximus, iliopsoas and lumber L4-5) however, it reported that BFR walk training does increase muscle mass in the trunk muscles.

To the best of our knowledge no study has assessed the effects of lower limb BFRT on abdominal muscles. Furthermore, research has shown that instability training can enhance abdominal muscles activation. However, effects of addition of instability during BFRT on musculoskeletal and performance outcomes are not known. Therefore, this study is designed to address some of the current research gaps that exists in BFRT protocols. This study will compare the effects of short duration BFRT protocols (high frequency vs low frequency) on musculoskeletal and performance outcomes. Furthermore, this study will try to understand the effects of addition of instability during BFRT on abdominal muscles.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Sedentary males (\< 2.5h/week physical activity) or \< 300 METs per week (36)
* Age 18-30 years
* BMI between 18.5-29.9
* Free from any lower-limb pain or injury
* No previous experience with BFRT
* Ankle brachial index values between 0.9-1.4
* Not doing regular strength training of lower limb in the past 6 months
* No strenuous physical activities 72h before and during the study period
* Non-smokers

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any injuries of the musculoskeletal system that could prevent the participants from training or testing
* Any use of medication and/or supplements (e.g., protein powder, vitamins, creatine, NSAIDs, etc.)
* Peripheral arterial disease
* Diabetes and hypertensive patients

Primary outcomes:
measure: Thigh Muscles Ultrasound Assessment
timeFrame: 2 weeks
measure: Abdomen Muscles Ultrasound Assessment
timeFrame: 2 weeks
measure: Strength Assessment Thigh Muscles
timeFrame: 2 weeks
measure: Electromyography Assessment
timeFrame: 2 weeks
measure: Jump Assessment
timeFrame: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness Assessment
timeFrame: 2 weeks
measure: Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale
timeFrame: 2 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Islamabad
country: Pakistan
facility: Woodlands Health Center
Study officials:
affiliation: asghar.khan@riphah.edu.pk
name: Asghar Khan
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Riphah International University
name: Waqar Ahmed Awan, PhD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Riphah International University
name: Saad Rauf, PhD*
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: