Clinical trial NCT03737032: Theta Burst Stimulation in Young Adults With Depression
Official title: Theta Burst Stimulation in Young Adults With Depression
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Depression
Lead sponsor: University of Pittsburgh
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
First posted: 2018-11-09
Enrollment: 29
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 25
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: All participants will receive intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), continuous TBS, and sham TBS mimicking stimulation, in randomized, double-blind order across three sessions.
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: For the proposed 2-year study, the investigators will conduct a within-subject, counterbalanced investigation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the acute effects of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) on function in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in 35 young adults with depression (18-25 years, 50% female).

Detailed description: Each participant will undergo 3 sessions of TMS, one each of continuous and intermittent TBS--with the goal of decreasing or increasing dmPFC responding, respectively--and one of sham TBS. Session order will be counterbalanced, with a double-blind approach to condition. Brain function, behavior, and mood will be assessed before and after each TBS session. Broadly, the investigators predict that inhibitory TBS to the dmPFC will enhance neural, behavioral, and subjective aspects of reward function by reducing dmPFC function and dmPFC connectivity with the ventral striatum (VS).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

• DSM-5 Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia), Other Specified Depressive Disorder, or Other Unspecified Depressive Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

* Bipolar disorder, substance dependence, or lifetime history of psychosis
* Neurological disorder (e.g., seizure disorder)
* Pregnant
* MRI contradictions: claustrophobia, permanent orthodontic devices, metal implants or other forms of metal in the body that cannot be removed

Primary outcomes:
measure: Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Activation
timeFrame: Task fMRI is conducted after each of 3 TBS sessions (intermittent, continuous, sham; in randomized, counterbalanced order) at approx 3, 5, and 7 weeks after study entry.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Positive Affect
timeFrame: pre and post each of 3 TBS administrations, with TBS lasting up to 190 seconds. cTBS, iTBS, and sham TBS each occurred in a single day.
measure: VS-dmPFC Functional Connectivity
timeFrame: Task fMRI is conducted after each of 3 TBS sessions (intermittent, continuous, sham; in randomized, counterbalanced order). Sessions occur at approx 3, 5, and 7 weeks after study entry.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Pittsburgh
country: United States
facility: The University of Pittsburgh, Department of Psychiatry
state: Pennsylvania
Study officials:
affiliation: The University of Pittsburgh
name: Erika E Forbes, Ph.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Forbes EE, Dahl RE. Neural systems of positive affect: relevance to understanding child and adolescent depression? Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Summer;17(3):827-50. doi: 10.1017/S095457940505039X.
citation: Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13848-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601417103. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
citation: Downar J, Daskalakis ZJ. New targets for rTMS in depression: a review of convergent evidence. Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
citation: Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, Dunlop K, Mansouri F, Meng Y, Fetcho RN, Zebley B, Oathes DJ, Etkin A, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer K, Keller J, Mayberg HS, Gunning FM, Alexopoulos GS, Fox MD, Pascual-Leone A, Voss HU, Casey BJ, Dubin MJ, Liston C. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/nm.4246. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
citation: Dunlop K, Gaprielian P, Blumberger D, Daskalakis ZJ, Kennedy SH, Giacobbe P, Downar J. MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder. J Vis Exp. 2015 Aug 11;(102):e53129. doi: 10.3791/53129.
citation: Etkin A, Egner T, Kalisch R. Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
citation: Ferenczi EA, Zalocusky KA, Liston C, Grosenick L, Warden MR, Amatya D, Katovich K, Mehta H, Patenaude B, Ramakrishnan C, Kalanithi P, Etkin A, Knutson B, Glover GH, Deisseroth K. Prefrontal cortical regulation of brainwide circuit dynamics and reward-related behavior. Science. 2016 Jan 1;351(6268):aac9698. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9698.
citation: Forbes EE, Dahl RE. Research Review: altered reward function in adolescent depression: what, when and how? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;53(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02477.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
citation: Forbes EE, Hariri AR, Martin SL, Silk JS, Moyles DL, Fisher PM, Brown SM, Ryan ND, Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Dahl RE. Altered striatal activation predicting real-world positive affect in adolescent major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):64-73. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081336. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
citation: Fox MD, Buckner RL, Liu H, Chakravarty MM, Lozano AM, Pascual-Leone A. Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 14;111(41):E4367-75. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405003111. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
citation: Grossheinrich N, Rau A, Pogarell O, Hennig-Fast K, Reinl M, Karch S, Dieler A, Leicht G, Mulert C, Sterr A, Padberg F. Theta burst stimulation of the prefrontal cortex: safety and impact on cognition, mood, and resting electroencephalogram. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 May 1;65(9):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.029. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
citation: Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):4-26. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.129.
citation: Hanlon CA, Dowdle LT, Austelle CW, DeVries W, Mithoefer O, Badran BW, George MS. What goes up, can come down: Novel brain stimulation paradigms may attenuate craving and craving-related neural circuitry in substance dependent individuals. Brain Res. 2015 Dec 2;1628(Pt A):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.053. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
citation: Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033.
citation: Opie GM, Vosnakis E, Ridding MC, Ziemann U, Semmler JG. Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults. Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar-Apr;10(2):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
citation: Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
citation: Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
citation: Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S, Humayan A, Hargreaves D, Trigwell P. A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;167(1):99-103. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.1.99.
citation: Treadway MT, Buckholtz JW, Schwartzman AN, Lambert WE, Zald DH. Worth the 'EEfRT'? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006598.
citation: Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
citation: Zhang WN, Chang SH, Guo LY, Zhang KL, Wang J. The neural correlates of reward-related processing in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Affect Disord. 2013 Nov;151(2):531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.039. Epub 2013 Jul 12.