Clinical trial NCT02167698: Trial of an Alternate Mode of Providing Artificial Breaths to Children With Very Severe Pneumonia
Official title: A Parallel-arm, Single Blind Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing 'AIRWAY PRESSURE RELEASE VENTILATION' and 'LOW-TIDAL VOLUME VENTILATION' in Children With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Keywords: Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome
Mechanical ventilation
Airway pressure release ventilation
Conventional low-tidal volume ventilation
Lead sponsor: PGIMER
Sponsor class: UNKNOWN
First posted: 2014-06-19
Enrollment: 52
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 1
Maximum age (years): 12
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study attempts to study a new ventilation mode in children with Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite decades of research, no intervention has brought about a significant decrease in ARDS mortality. Moreover, most of the studies are adult-based and have been extrapolated to children. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode is hypothesized to be superior in terms of lower need for sedation, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, etc. It is unique and the first worldwide randomized controlled trial on APRV mode in children.

We plan to recruit a minimum of 50 children aged (1 month-12 years) in each group. The study is to be conducted at the Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh between March 2014 to March 2016. This trial would recruit children with respiratory failure and early ARDS and, randomize them to receive either conventional ventilation or the APRV mode. Rest of the supportive care has also been protocolized so that both groups receive treatment as per the existing best practices in every aspect. The primary outcome being studied is the number of ventilator-free days. The secondary outcomes include length of PICU stay, hospital stay, organ-failure free days, 28 day \& 3 month survival, biomarkers of lung injury (IL-6, IL-8, Angiopoeitin-2, soluble-ICAM-1, etc), functional status, Pulmonary function tests, etc. Funding request would be sent to the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Assessing lung biomarkers like Interleukin-6 would assess the role of different modes of ventilation in acting as triggers for multi-organ dysfunction as well as for worsening lung injury. This pathbreaking research is likely to open up new avenues upon completion.

Detailed description: Study setting:

15-bedded pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a multi-specialty, tertiary referral and teaching hospital- the Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC) in Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India Study period Recruitment: January 2014 to December 2016 Data Analysis: Jan 2017 to June 2017 Study design An open-labelled, parallel-arm, efficacy/feasibility randomized controlled trial Ethics approval Ethics approval has been obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee. The study has been registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (ctri.nic.in). Informed consent will be obtained from the parents/legal guardian and the conversation would be recorded using a camera (audio-visual documentation of evidence).

Sample size estimation Assuming alpha error of 5% and power of 80% with non-inferiority limit of 4 days (Standard deviation of VFDs being 8.2 days in the conventional low tidal volume ventilation group in pilot trial), sample size was calculated to be 52 per group. As this is a safety and feasibility trial, an interim analysis would be done at 50% enrolment.

Enrolment Parents or legal guardians of children who satisfy the above eligibility criteria will be invited by the investigator to participate in the study. Parents are free not to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any point of time. All children, irrespective of their enrollment in the study, will receive standard pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care as per the unit's existing protocol. An information sheet (in Hindi/ English) furnishing details of the study will be provided to the parents. Given the fact that all these children are sedated and on mechanical ventilation, obtaining assent would not be feasible in this study.

Randomization Sequence generation A computer-generated, unstratified, block randomization with variable block sizes will be performed to determine group allocation. A person not involved in the study will perform the random number allocation and prepare opaque, sealed envelopes containing the allocation.

Concealment allocation Each pre-sealed opaque envelope would be opened only after obtaining a written consent and audio-visual record of the same. As the randomization is done using a variable block size, and prepared by a statistician not directly involved in the study, there would be no way of predicting the random allocation, thus minimizing the risk of allocation bias.

Randomization implementation After parents provide informed consent, randomization would be done within the next one hour and child initiated on appropriate mode of ventilation. The supportive care for both the groups, would be as per the attached supplementary protocols

Intervention protocol:

The Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) intervention protocol has been designed based on the available APRV literature as of Dec 2013.

Start the child on APRV mode of ventilation with the following settings:

* P HIGH would determine the degree of baseline lung inflation. A rough estimate can be obtained based on the plateau pressure requirements on the conventional mode of ventilation. Perform an inspiratory hold to ascertain the plateau pressures:

  * If P plateau \> 30 cm water, set P HIGH at 30 cm water
  * If P plateau \< 30 cm water, set P HIGH at or 1-2 cm above the measured P plateau.
* Alternatively, if P plateau cannot be measured, P HIGH can be set according to the following guide:

PaO2/ FiO2 ratio P High \< 250 15-20 \< 200 20-25 \< 150 25-28

After initiating a particular P HIGH, a clinical assessment of lung volume needs to be followed with a chest radiograph to determine the degree of lung inflation (similar to setting of Mean airway pressure in High frequency oscillatory mode of ventilation). The child's P HIGH is adjusted to maintain optimal lung volume, without clinical or radiological evidence of hyperinflation: no signs of decreased cardiac output/ hypotension and/or the level of the diaphragm visible greater than the ninth rib.

* Start at T High of 4 seconds; Titrate T High based on oxygenation status. At least 80 -95% of the total cycle time should be spent in T High.
* Set P Low at Zero cm H2O
* Set T Low so that expiratory flow decreases by 25 % of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR); usually 0.1-0.8 seconds. The ratio of T-PEFR to PEFR should be targeted near 75%. This entity needs to be titrated every 2-4 hours and may have to be shortened as lung injury advances.
* Set Pressure Support at ZERO
* The number of breaths per minute or number of releases is a function of T High and T Low as depicted below:

Weaning from APRV would also be carried out in a structured, protocolized manner. The following strategies would be adopted:

1. As child's clinical condition and oxygenation index improves, and Fraction of inspired oxygen levels are brought down to 0.6, T HIGH is increased in steps of 0.5-2 seconds till it is 10-12 seconds.
2. P HIGH can be subsequently decreased in steps of 2-3 cm H2O till a value of 12-16 is reached. Decrease in P HIGH can be carried out earlier if features of hyperinflation (clinical/radiological) appear at any point.
3. The goal is to reach pressure levels of 12-16 cm H2O and then switch to Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 6-8 cm H2O, from which child can be extubated directly to nasal prong CPAP or gradually tapered off CPAP to Endotracheal-T piece and subsequently extubated depending on the overall clinical status.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Children aged 1 month- 12 years, who are intubated and mechanically ventilated with the following criteria of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome:

  1. Acute presentation within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/ worsening respiratory symptoms
  2. Bilateral opacities on chest imaging - not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules
  3. Respiratory failure is not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (Echocardiographic assessment to exclude hydrostatic edema)
  4. Impaired oxygenation with PaO2/ FiO2 ratio less than 300 or Oxygenation Index greater than 5.3

Exclusion Criteria:

* Greater than 24 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
* Co-existing raised intra-cranial pressure/ any other condition necessitating use of high dose of sedation (likely to suppress spontaneous breathing)
* Radiologically confirmed air leak prior to randomization - Pneumothorax/ Pulmonary interstitial Emphysema
* Clinical evidence of significant airway obstruction/ severe bronchospasm / reactive airway disease
* Have received mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours (before meeting inclusion criteria)
* Symptomatic or uncorrected congenital heart disease or a right to left intra-cardiac shunt
* Any underlying condition that is likely to impair spontaneous respiratory drive/ efforts (Eg: Brainstem dysfunction, neuromuscular paralysis)
* Underlying chronic diseases (Eg: Cystic fibrosis, Chronic lung disease, etc)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Twenty-eight-day ventilator-free days
timeFrame: 28 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Twenty-eight-day survival
timeFrame: 28 days
measure: Length of PICU stay
timeFrame: Up to 3 months
measure: Organ-failure-free-days
timeFrame: 28 days
measure: Time-to-recovery of lung injury
timeFrame: Up to 28 days
measure: Number of children with adverse events
timeFrame: 3 years
measure: All-cause mortality
timeFrame: Three months
measure: Spirometry
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Pediatric Cerebral performance category
timeFrame: 6 Months
measure: Pediatric Overall performance category
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Spirometry
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Pediatric overall performance category
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Pediatric cerebral performance category
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Interleukin-6 levels
timeFrame: 72 hours of enrolment
measure: Arterial lactate levels
timeFrame: 72 hours
measure: Percentage reduction in 'oxygenation Index'
timeFrame: 6 hours
measure: Radiological score
timeFrame: 48 hours
measure: Duration of inotropic requirement
timeFrame: up to 7 days
measure: Vaso-active inotropic score
timeFrame: 72 hours
measure: Cumulative dose of sedation
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: Cumulative dose of analgesic
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: Cumulative dose of neuromuscular blocking agent
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: Requirement for renal replacement therapy
timeFrame: 28 days
measure: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score
timeFrame: 7 days
Other outcomes:
measure: Recruitment rate
timeFrame: 3 years
measure: Rate of enrolment among eligible children
timeFrame: 3 years
measure: Contamination rate
timeFrame: 3 years
measure: Attrition rate
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Protocol adherence rate
timeFrame: 3 years
Locations:
city: Chandigarh
country: India
facility: Pediatric Intensive care unit, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Advanced Pediatrics Center, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research
Study officials:
affiliation: DM (Pediatric Critical Care) Senior Resident, Division of Pediatric critical care, Dept Of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, INDIA
name: Saptharishi L G, MBBS, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Additional Professor, Division of Pediatric critical care, Dept of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
name: Jayashree Muralidharan, MBBS, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Chief, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Professor & Head, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
name: Sunit C Singhi, MBBS, MD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: Assistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Critical care, Dept of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
name: Arun Bansal, MBBS, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Andrews P, Habashi N. Airway pressure release ventilation. Curr Probl Surg. 2013 Oct;50(10):462-70. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2013.08.010. No abstract available.
citation: Andrews PL, Shiber JR, Jaruga-Killeen E, Roy S, Sadowitz B, O'Toole RV, Gatto LA, Nieman GF, Scalea T, Habashi NM. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce mortality in high-risk trauma patients: a systematic review of observational trauma ARDS literature. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Oct;75(4):635-41. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829d3504.
citation: Emr B, Gatto LA, Roy S, Satalin J, Ghosh A, Snyder K, Andrews P, Habashi N, Marx W, Ge L, Wang G, Dean DA, Vodovotz Y, Nieman G. Airway pressure release ventilation prevents ventilator-induced lung injury in normal lungs. JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1005-12. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3746.
citation: Roy SK, Emr B, Sadowitz B, Gatto LA, Ghosh A, Satalin JM, Snyder KP, Ge L, Wang G, Marx W, Dean D, Andrews P, Singh A, Scalea T, Habashi N, Nieman GF. Preemptive application of airway pressure release ventilation prevents development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in a rat traumatic hemorrhagic shock model. Shock. 2013 Sep;40(3):210-6. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31829efb06.
citation: Roy S, Habashi N, Sadowitz B, Andrews P, Ge L, Wang G, Roy P, Ghosh A, Kuhn M, Satalin J, Gatto LA, Lin X, Dean DA, Vodovotz Y, Nieman G. Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury. Shock. 2013 Jan;39(1):28-38. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31827b47bb.
citation: Lalgudi Ganesan S, Jayashree M, Chandra Singhi S, Bansal A. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1199-1207. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201705-0989OC.