Clinical trial NCT00581893: Phenytoin and Driving Safety: A Randomized, Controlled Cross-Over Study
Official title: Phenytoin and Driving Safety: A Randomized, Controlled Cross-Over Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Cognitive Measures
Driving Simulator Performance
Keywords: epilepsy
cognitive impairment
driving simulation
cross-over study
Lead sponsor: University of Iowa
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2007-12-28
Enrollment: 20
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 25
Maximum age (years): 60
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Automobile driving is a crucial aspect of everyday life, yet vehicular crashes represent a serious public health problem. Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking. The broad goal of our project is to determine the specific effects of the most commonly utilized AED, phenytoin, by assessing driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Our proposed experiments will assess: (1) cognitive functions using standardized neuropsychological tests (of attention, perception, memory, and executive functions), (2) driving performance during phenytoin and placebo administration, and (3) the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive performance upon driving performance. To measure driving performance, we will use a state-of-the-art fixed-base interactive driving simulator that allows us to observe driver errors in an environment that is challenging yet safe for the driver and tester, under conditions of optimal stimulus and response control. The results of this study of 30 drivers treated with phenytoin and placebo will increase the understanding of the role of AED-related cognitive impairment on driving safety errors. A better understanding of the impact of AEDs upon driving performance is necessary to rationally develop interventions that could help prevent crashes by drivers treated with AEDs.

Detailed description: Patients with epilepsy are at elevated risk for automobile crashes, causing great personal suffering and financial costs to society. Most collisions involving epileptic drivers are not seizure related but may instead result from cognitive effects upon driving performance of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Several million American drivers take AEDs for treatment of medical conditions besides epilepsy and may also be at risk for cognitive impairments that can reduce driving performance. Empirical evidence of the effects of AEDs on driving performance would enable development of driving guidelines that could lower the risk of injurious motor vehicle collisions; however, this evidence is currently lacking.

The broad goal of the current project is to determine the specific effects of AEDs on cognitive function and driving performance. To address this goal we will assess driving performance and cognitive abilities in neurologically normal volunteers taking phenytoin (Dilantin), the most commonly prescribed AED. Effects of phenytoin on driving performance and cognition will be addressed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Driver cognition will be assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Driving performance will be objectively assessed in all participants on standardized tasks enacted in a state-of-the-art driving simulator. Our 3 Specific Aims are:

Aim 1: To assess the effects of phenytoin on cognitive abilities that are crucial to the driving task, including perception, attention, memory, and executive function.

Hypothesis 1: A driver's cognitive abilities will decline during steady-state phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater decline.

Aim 2: To assess effects of phenytoin on driving performance and safety errors in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.

Hypothesis 2: Driving performance will decline and driver safety errors will increase during phenytoin administration compared to placebo. Drivers with higher blood levels of phenytoin will show greater impairments of driving.

Aim 3: To assess the effects of phenytoin-related cognitive impairments upon driving performance in a state-of-the-art driving simulator.

Hypothesis 3. Impairments of cognitive function affecting perception, attention, memory, executive function, and arousal will increase the likelihood of driver errors that may lead to a crash.

Our hypotheses would be supported if the drivers taking phenytoin, as opposed to placebo, demonstrate worse cognitive performance on neuropsychological tests, and more safety errors and crashes in the simulator. The hypotheses would also be supported if drivers with higher phenytoin levels show greater impairments of cognition and driving. Once the effects of phenytoin on driving performance are demonstrated in this project, we will have evidence to support more comprehensive research addressing specific dosing and serum levels and acute versus chronic administration.

There is currently no evidence concerning the effects of phenytoin on driving performance. Accurate driving performance data on patients receiving phenytoin would allow determination of fair and accurate criteria for making recommendations to drive or not to drive affecting millions of patients taking AEDS for epilepsy and other conditions. These data could also help reduce the risk of car crashes due to medication side effects.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Anticipating a 10-15% drop-out rate, we will induct 30 neurologically normal subjects (age 18 (21) -60) to obtain 25 evaluable subjects who are legally licensed to drive in their state of residence and have been actively driving under appropriate legal guidelines for at least 5 years (to minimize performance variations of novice drivers).
* Because this study is intended to determine the potential effects of phenytoin on driving performance, a relatively healthy cohort of patients must be chosen. Chronic medical or psychiatric conditions could cause significant alterations in driving performance independent of those caused by phenytoin, which would complicate interpretation of performance impairments.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Subjects who are younger than 18 or older than 60
* Have history of prior seizures, family history of epilepsy, or prior history of head injury
* Have a known history of prior drug or alcohol abuse or unwillingness to abstain from drug or alcohol use during the study period
* Have a past or current active neurological or psychiatric disorder that could impair cognitive or driving performance (i.e. baseline IQ \< 90, dementia, mental retardation, stroke, severe head injury, schizophrenia, active clinical depression, progressive brain tumor).
* Subjects who have a chronic medical condition (i.e. diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, hepatic dysfunction, hematologic condition, HIV)
* Taking medications known to affect the central nervous system (i.e. baseline pre-study treatment with antiepileptic drug, anxiolytics, sedatives, hypnotics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, narcotics and tranquilizers)
* Regularly use over-the-counter cough suppressants, antihistamines, or sleep aids; or who ingest over 7 cups of daily coffee or currently smoke cigarettes.
* Subjects will be excluded if they cannot complete SIREN testing or neuropsychological instruments because of visual or hearing impairment (history or screening discovery of corrected visual acuity of less than 20/50) or other physical disability, or if they have a history of severe motion sickness as an adult-a marker for patients who develop simulator sickness and therefore cannot participate in SIREN testing.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Number of Subjects Who Had a Driving Simulator Crash Event
timeFrame: 1 month
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Iowa City
country: United States
facility: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
state: Iowa
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Iowa
name: Erik K St. Louis, M.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: St. Louis EK, McEvoy S, Shi QC, Rizzo M. Useful Field of View impairment in partial epilepsy. Unpublished observations and submitted abstract to 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driving Asssessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Rockport, Maine, June, 2005.