Clinical trial NCT05354856: The Effect of Chemoradiotherapy on Gastric Perfusion in Patients With Gastric Cancer.
Official title: The Effect of Chemoradiotherapy on Gastric Perfusion in Patients With Gastric Cancer.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Gastric Cancer
Lead sponsor: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-05-02
Enrollment: 11
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Only patients with resectable gastric cancer are included in the study
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: A study from our group (Osterkamp et al. in preparation) used ICG to evaluate intraoperative changes in gastric perfusion when reducing the circulating blood volume by blood withdrawal in pigs. We saw a significant reduction in gastric perfusion with decreased blood volume, and this reduction of gastric perfusion was detectable with ICG. As data from a previous trial (PRESET phase 2 Protocol nr: H-15014904) has shown that chemotherapy decreases the circulating red blood cell volume in patients with gastroesophageal cancer, we wish to evaluate if standard care neoadjuvant chemotherapy also influences gastric perfusion. Gastric perfusion will be assessed during a screening laparoscopy (before chemotherapy) and then compared with a second assessment during gastric resection (after chemotherapy). The gastric perfusion will be measured using fluorescence-guided surgery with Indocyanine Green.

Participants will be offered the opportunity to have their blood volume measured during the trial. This is not required in order to take part in the fluorescence angiography part of the study.

Detailed description: Screening Laparoscopy:

As part of the standard care for gastric cancer, all patients undergo a screening laparoscopy before entering neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The procedure is performed to detect overt metastases not detected on the CT/PET-CT scans. First, the patient is placed under a standardized general anesthesia, and the laparoscopic set-up is completed. After anesthesia a peripheral arterial catheter will be placed in order acquire reading of cardia output and stroke volume. The patient will then be fluid optimized using a standardized stroke volume (SV) optimization algorithm. The abdomen is inspected visually for signs of metastatic disease. The small bowel is then manipulated, allowing for visualization of the stomach. A bolus of ICG (0.2 mg/kg body weight) will be injected intravenously and flushed with 5 mL of saline. Gastric perfusion will subsequently be assessed along specific regions of interest (ROI) with q-ICG to obtain baseline perfusion values.

As a substudy, 10 patients will have two measurements with ICG during the screening laparoscopy, one befor eand one after fluid optimization. These patients will receive an ICG dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight per measurement, totalling 0.2 mg/kg after the two measurements.

Resection of gastric cancer:

The patient is placed under general anesthesia and after the stomach is visualized through surgical incision, a bolus of ICG (0.2 mg/kg body weight) will be injected intravenously and flushed with 5 mL of saline. The ROIs (the same ROIs as described in 3.7.1) will then be assessed with q-ICG. The anesthetic protocol will up to this point match that of the setting during the screening laparoscopy.

Fluorescence angiography:

During the screening laparoscopy, a laparoscope (telescope 30°, 5 mm, Arthrex Danmark A/S) will be connected to a camera system (Synergy, Arthrex Danmark A/S) and a light-source (Synergy Laser Light Source, Arthrex Danmark A/S) will supply the excitatory light and record the ICG angiography. The laparoscope will be fixed in a mechanical holding arm 10 cm from the tissue of interest, ensuring a stable position throughout the experiment.

Measuring of blood volume:

Hemoglobin mass (Hbmass) will be determined using a carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing technique with a typical error of 1.0 %, as previously described (25). In brief, all individuals will rest for 20 min in the supine position before each measurement. During this time, a catheter will be inserted in an antecubital vein. Thereafter, 2 ml of blood will be sampled and analyzed immediately in triplicates for percentage carboxyhaemoglobin (% HbCO) and \[Hb\] (ABL800, Radiometer, Denmark). Subsequently, individuals will breathe 100 % O2 for 4 min to flush nitrogen from the airways. Then, a bolus of 1.5 ml kg-1 of 99.997 % chemically pure CO (CO N47, Air Liquide, France) will be administrated into the breathing circuit. Individuals will re-breath this gas mixture for 10 min. An additional 2 ml blood sample will be obtained and analyzed in triplicates. The change in % HbCO will be used to calculate Hbmass. Total RBCV, PV and BV will be derived from measures of Hbmass and hematocrit29.

The collected blood samples will not be stored after the measurement.

Statistics:

A comparison of the gastric perfusion before and after chemotherapy will be performed using Friedman's test or a repeated measures ANOVA / linear mixed-effects depending on a non- or parametric nature of the data. A P-value \< 0.05 will be considered significant. Statistic evaluation will be performed using IBM SPSS Statistics © (v 22.0 SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients (above 18 years) scheduled for planned open or robot-assisted resection of gastric cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Allergy towards; iodine, indocyanine green or shellfish
* Severe liver insufficiency
* Thyrotoxicosis
* Nephropathy requiring dialysis
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Legally incompetent for any reason
* Withdrawal of inclusion consent
* Disseminated disease or other that contraindicates curative surgery

Primary outcomes:
measure: Difference in gastric perfusion
timeFrame: 2 years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Short term outcome
timeFrame: 30 days after surgery
measure: Short term outcome
timeFrame: 30 days after surgery
measure: Short term outcome
timeFrame: 30 days after surgery
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Copenhagen
country: Denmark
facility: Rigshospitalet
state: Kbh Ø
Study officials:
affiliation: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
name: Jens TF Osterkamp, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Simonsen C, de Heer P, Bjerre ED, Suetta C, Hojman P, Pedersen BK, Svendsen LB, Christensen JF. Sarcopenia and Postoperative Complication Risk in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):58-69. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002679.
citation: Horowitz M, Neeman E, Sharon E, Ben-Eliyahu S. Exploiting the critical perioperative period to improve long-term cancer outcomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;12(4):213-26. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.224. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
citation: Pommergaard HC, Achiam MP, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Impaired blood supply in the colonic anastomosis in mice compromises healing. Int Surg. 2015 Jan;100(1):70-6. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00191.1.
citation: Fawcett A, Shembekar M, Church JS, Vashisht R, Springall RG, Nott DM. Smoking, hypertension, and colonic anastomotic healing; a combined clinical and histopathological study. Gut. 1996 May;38(5):714-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.5.714.
citation: Kim MJ, Shin R, Oh HK, Park JW, Jeong SY, Park JG. The impact of heavy smoking on anastomotic leakage and stricture after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. World J Surg. 2011 Dec;35(12):2806-10. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1286-1.
citation: Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U, Hotz HG, Buhr HJ. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Aug;22(8):919-27. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0260-0. Epub 2007 Jan 27.
citation: Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):1919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
citation: Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M, DeMeester SR, Fleshman JW, Hyman NH, Margolin DA, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Molena D, Newman MI, Rafferty JF, Safar B, Senagore AJ, Zmora O, Wexner SD. Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Dec;20(12):2035-2051. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3255-3. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
citation: Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milsom JW. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):108-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd.
citation: Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: Healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26(3):131-6. doi: 10.1002/micr.20197.
citation: Christensen JF, Jones LW, Tolver A, Jorgensen LW, Andersen JL, Adamsen L, Hojman P, Nielsen RH, Rorth M, Daugaard G. Safety and efficacy of resistance training in germ cell cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 8;111(1):8-16. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.273. Epub 2014 May 27.
citation: Garski TR, Staller BJ, Hepner G, Banka VS, Finney RA Jr. Adverse reactions after administration of indocyanine green. JAMA. 1978 Aug 18;240(7):635. doi: 10.1001/jama.240.7.635b. No abstract available.
citation: Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Patila T, Spillmann T, Tuchin VV, Venermo M, Valisuo P. A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:940585. doi: 10.1155/2012/940585. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
citation: Baiocchi GL, Diana M, Boni L. Indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging in visceral and hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: State of the art and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 21;24(27):2921-2930. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i27.2921.
citation: Mangano A, Fernandes E, Gheza F, Bustos R, Chen LL, Masrur M, Giulianotti PC. Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green-Enhanced Fluorescence and Evaluation of the Bowel Microperfusion During Robotic Colorectal Surgery: a Retrospective Original Paper. Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:93-100.
citation: Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET, Oh DS, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR. Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):74-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000811.
citation: Mangano A, Gheza F, Chen LL, Minerva EM, Giulianotti PC. Indocyanine Green (Icg)-Enhanced Fluorescence for Intraoperative Assessment of Bowel Microperfusion During Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery: The Quest for Evidence-Based Results. Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1;32:101-104.
citation: Gossedge G, Vallance A, Jayne D. Diverse applications for near infra-red intraoperative imaging. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 3:7-11. doi: 10.1111/codi.13023.
citation: Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, Suwa H, Ota M, Kunisaki C, Endo I. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):202-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06751-9. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
citation: Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Jafari MD, Stamos MJ. The Role of Fluorescent Angiography in Anastomotic Leaks. Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:83-88.
citation: Alekseev M, Rybakov E, Shelygin Y, Chernyshov S, Zarodnyuk I. A study investigating the perfusion of colorectal anastomoses using fluorescence angiography: results of the FLAG randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1147-1153. doi: 10.1111/codi.15037. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
citation: Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N, Mocanu V, Tian C, Birch D, Turner SR, Karmali S. Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):384-394. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6503-7. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
citation: Nerup N, Andersen HS, Ambrus R, Strandby RB, Svendsen MBS, Madsen MH, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Quantification of fluorescence angiography in a porcine model. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):655-662. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1531-z. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
citation: Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013 Jan 21;346:e8668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8668.
citation: Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
citation: Owens SL. Indocyanine green angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Mar;80(3):263-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.3.263. No abstract available.
citation: Spinoglio G, Bertani E, Borin S, Piccioli A, Petz W. Green indocyanine fluorescence in robotic abdominal surgery. Updates Surg. 2018 Sep;70(3):375-379. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0585-6. Epub 2018 Aug 29.