Clinical trial NCT02692105: Comparison of HDR vs. LDR Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Pilot Study of Low Dose Rate Compared to High Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy for Favourable Risk and Low Tier Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Prostate Cancer
Keywords: prostate adenocarcinoma
intermediate risk group
brachytherapy
High Dose Rate vs Low Dose Rate
Quality of Life
Lead sponsor: British Columbia Cancer Agency
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-02-25
Enrollment: 60
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 40
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study will offer men with intermediate risk prostate cancer who are suitable for, and interested in, prostate brachytherapy, the opportunity to be randomized between low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy using permanent implantation of radioactive seeds (the current standard of care in BC) and high dose rate (HDR) or temporary brachytherapy which is also available as a standard of care in BC but only when used as a boost in addition with external beam radiotherapy. In addition, men will be offered the opportunity for testing the aggressiveness of their cancer using Cell Cycle Progression Gene Profile.

Detailed description: Purpose:

To conduct a Phase III randomized trial for favorable tier intermediate risk prostate cancer and selected favorable risk tumors to evaluate the difference in Quality of Life in the urinary domain between LDR and HDR brachytherapy.

Hypothesis:

Because of more rapid dose delivery with HDR compared to LDR brachytherapy (15 minutes vs. 6 months) and more precise control of dose to adjacent critical structures (prostatic and bulbo-membranous urethra and anterior rectal wall), HDR prostate brachytherapy has been associated with more rapid recovery from acute symptoms and a more favorable side effect protocol when used as a boost in combination with external beam radiotherapy. The hypothesis is that this advantage will be maintained when brachytherapy is used as monotherapy without the addition of external beam radiation.

Justification:

In British Columbia, LDR prostate brachytherapy is the current standard for selected men with favorable risk prostate cancer who are not suitable for, or willing to accept active surveillance, and for men with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy has been available in BC for over 15 years and is highly effective with 7-year biochemical disease-free rates of \~95%. However, this type of treatment has a prolonged recovery phase with return to baseline urinary function taking 6 to 12 months. This is partly due to the fact that the radiation is delivered over a 6 month period from the implanted seeds, and partly due to uncertainty in final seed placement. HDR brachytherapy has the advantage of delivering treatment very rapidly over 15-20 minutes, and also exploits the radiobiologic nature of prostate cancer which is more responsive to large doses of radiotherapy. Experience with using HDR brachytherapy as a boost has shown a much reduced impact on quality of life.

Objectives:

Primary: To evaluate the difference in QOL in the urinary domain between LDR and HDR brachytherapy using the urinary domain of the EPIC prostate cancer specific QOL questionnaire.

Secondary:

* To assess differences in the bowel and sexual domains of the EPIC prostate cancer specific QOL questionnaire between the 2 treatments
* To asses time to recovery of the IPS Score which is widely used to assess urinary function after prostate cancer treatment. The time to return to baseline +/- 3 points will be determined.
* Acute and long-term toxicity will be graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V4) at each follow up time point
* TRUS- MRI fusion will be developed within our planning software to facilitate treatment planning
* To assess treatment efficacy, PSA will be recorded every 6 months to 5 years and then annually to 10 years and prostate re-biopsy will be performed at 36 months after radiotherapy.

Optional:

For those patients consenting to targeted biopsies under anaesthesia at the start of their brachytherapy procedure (separate consent)

* Verify MRI-TRUS fusion accuracy
* Correlate Cell Cycle Progression scores with outcome.

Research Method:

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)will be performed on all men as a staging procedure to ensure appropriateness for brachytherapy as monotherapy (without the addition of external beam radiotherapy or hormone therapy). The value of mpMRI in staging prostate cancer is widely recognized. Previous studies have shown that over 90% of intermediate risk cancers are visible on mpMRI. The MR images will be fused with the planning trans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) for each patient, ensuring adequate dose coverage of the lesion.

For those patients consenting to optional biopsies under anesthesia, accuracy of the fusion will be verified by obtaining 2 biopsies of the visualized lesion under TRUS guidance at the start of the brachytherapy procedure.

Follow up is as per standard practice to assess urinary, bowel and sexual side effects. In addition to the standard forms, patients will also complete an EPIC questionnaire. The questionnaires are completed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months to 3 years and then annually, as per the standard follow up schedule.

Once the biopsy material has been pathologically confirmed to contain the target lesion, the aggressiveness will be assessed through Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) Gene Profile testing.

Men may be randomized to the type of brachytherapy and decline the biopsies. This initial protocol is a Pilot that will test feasibility of the randomization (patient acceptance). The aim is to accrue 60 men over 18-24 months and if achieved then apply to expand to a total of 200 men.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Clinical stage T1c-T2b, PSA \< 20, Gleason \< 8
* ECOG 0-1
* Low tier intermediate-risk prostate cancer is defined by;

  o a single NCCN intermediate risk factor (either Gleason 7(3+4) and PSA \< 10 ng/ml OR Gleason 6 and PSA 10-20 ng/ml)
* Extensive favorable-risk disease is defined as:

  * clinical stage T1c-T2a
  * PSA \< 10
  * Gleason 6
  * ≥ 50% of biopsy cores containing cancer
  * PSA density \> 0.2 ng/cc
* Selected intermediate risk patients not defined above

  * - T1c/T2a
  * - PSA \< 10
  * -Gleason 4+3
  * -\< 33% of cores involved
  * -Max tumour length in any core 10 mm
* No androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
* Prostate volume by TRUS ≤ 60 cc.
* Not eligible for, or accepting of, active surveillance according to NCCN guidelines.
* Signed study specific informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Prior radical surgery for carcinoma of the prostate,
* Prior pelvic radiation
* Prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer,
* Prior TURP or cryosurgery of the prostate
* Claustrophobic or unable to undergo MRI

Primary outcomes:
measure: The difference in Quality of Life in the urinary domain between LDR and HDR brachytherapy.
timeFrame: 0-36 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Quality of Life in the bowel and sexual domains
timeFrame: 0-36 months
measure: Time to return to baseline +/- 3 points for the International Prostate Symptom Score
timeFrame: 0-36 months
measure: Acute and long term toxicity
timeFrame: 0-10 years
measure: TRUS- MRI fusion
timeFrame: baseline
measure: Biochemical Outcome
timeFrame: 5-10 years
measure: Histologic Outcome
timeFrame: 3 years
measure: Cell cycle progression score
timeFrame: one month
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Kelowna
country: Canada
facility: British Columbia Cancer Agency Center for the Southern Interior
state: British Columbia
Study officials:
affiliation: British Columbia Cancer Agency Program Director
name: Ross Halperin, MD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Crook J, Ots A, Gaztanaga M, Schmid M, Araujo C, Hilts M, Batchelar D, Parker B, Bachand F, Milette MP. Ultrasound-planned high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: dose painting to the dominant intraprostatic lesion. Brachytherapy. 2014 Sep-Oct;13(5):433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
citation: Batchelar D, Gaztanaga M, Schmid M, Araujo C, Bachand F, Crook J. Validation study of ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning compared with CT-based planning. Brachytherapy. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
citation: Schmid M, Crook JM, Batchelar D, Araujo C, Petrik D, Kim D, Halperin R. A phantom study to assess accuracy of needle identification in real-time planning of ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate prostate implants. Brachytherapy. 2013 Jan-Feb;12(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 17.