Clinical trial NCT04745156: A Study Using Brain Stimulation and Behavioral Therapy to Increase Extent of Resection in Low-Grade Gliomas
Official title: Inducing Functional Plasticity in Glioma-Involved Functional Cortex With Deficit-Inducing Cortical Stimulation and Targeted Behavioral Therapy to Increase Extent of Resection
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Glioma
Glioma Intracranial
Gliomas Benign
Brain Tumor
Brain Cancer
Motor Cortex; Lesion
Keywords: Brain Stimulation
NeuroPace
Cortex Stimulation
Neuroplasticity
Plasticity
Hand Motor Cortex
Primary Motor Cortex
M1
Motor Mapping
Resection
Surgery
Motor Rehabilitation
Prehabilitation
Lead sponsor: Medical College of Wisconsin
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-02-09
Enrollment: 3
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Brief summary: This study uses a cranial implant to deliver cortical stimulation that, when paired with physiotherapy, will remap the brain so that critical brain functions can be protected during brain tumor surgery. This pilot study will provide initial evidence for the safety and feasibility of such a protocol which will lead to future pivotal trials that could radically change eloquent area brain surgery. For patients with otherwise incompletely resectable brain tumors, this could mean a longer life expectancy and a better quality of life.

Detailed description: Study Protocol: Participants will undergo a standard-of-care craniotomy for resection of low-grade glioma. If part of the lesion cannot be removed due to involvement of functional cortex, RNS (Responsive Neurostimulation System \[RNS; NeuroPace, Inc.\]) electrodes will be implanted over the tumor-invaded area(s) in five participants. Stimulation will then be optimized for each individual to disrupt the function of the invaded cortical node (e.g., hand motor area -\> hand dysfunction) (Aim 1). Over the next two months, outpatient physiotherapy will work to overcome the stim-induced deficits through gradual increases in stimulation amplitude as other, non-stimulated brain regions begin to assume its function (Aim 2). Once complete, participants will return to the OR for device explantation, repeated intraoperative mapping, and extended resection (if safe) (Aim 3).

Aim 1: Optimize stimulation to maximize stim-induced deficits and minimize side effects Rationale: To induce plasticity, stimulation parameters must be individually tuned to maximize effect and minimize side effects. Approach: After device implantation and prior to hospital discharge, stimulus settings (frequency, pulse-width, and amplitude) will be optimized to the relevant clinical response while minimizing adverse effects (e.g., focal tonus, myoclonus, or seizures) while still in the safe, inpatient setting. Outcomes: Primary Endpoints: 1) stim-induced focal clinical deficit as measured on the relevant clinical scale (e.g., manual motor score \[0-5\], picture naming \[x/10\]), repetition \[x/3\]); 2) stim-induced side effects (e.g., seizures).

Aim 2: Evaluate extent of remapping and safety of outpatient stimulation-physiotherapy protocol. Rationale: The ability to deliver chronic, outpatient stimulation is vital for practical clinical translation, yet neither its safety nor efficacy has been demonstrated. Approach: After Aim 1, a physiotherapist will assign a personalized, outpatient therapy regimen aimed at overcoming stim-induced deficits. Participants will have daily virtual sessions and return to clinic 2x/week for amplitude increases to re-induce deficits that therapy has overcome. This will continue until stimulation no longer can induce a deficit, suggesting successful functional remapping and enabling a return to the OR for further resection. Outcomes: Primary Endpoints: 1) absence of stim-related ER visits, readmissions, or serious adverse events (safety), 2) changes in intraop stimulation maps from surgery 1 to surgery 2 (induced remapping).

Aim 3: Evaluate ability to extend surgical resections and associated neurological outcomes. Rationale: Any change in functional boundaries will only be useful if it results in a safe, extended resection. Approach: Each surgery will proceed with standard-of-care intraoperative functional mapping techniques and decision making. Neurological examinations will be performed preoperatively, daily while inpatient, then again at 2-weeks and 3-months postoperatively. Extent of resection will be evaluated as 3D residual tumor volume on postoperative MRI. Outcomes: Primary Endpoint: 1) Change in residual tumor volume after second versus first resection, 2) new neurological deficits 3-months after second resection compared to before second resection. Secondary Endpoint: 1) New, temporary neurological deficits after the second surgery

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18-65 years old
2. Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
3. Radiographic evidence of likely low-grade glioma on MRI (i.e. non-enhancing) invading primary motor cortex in the non-dominant hemisphere.
4. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 75
5. Normal or near normal motor strength (i.e., at least 3/5 in relevant areas)
6. Normal or near normal speech (Can consistently name at least 4/5 cards)
7. No medical contraindication to surgery
8. Free of other illness that may shorten life expectancy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Presence of other malignancy not in remission
2. Evidence of bi-hemispheric or widespread tumor involvement
3. Likely candidate to receive GTR on initial resection
4. Medically high-risk surgical candidate
5. History of recent scalp or systemic infection
6. Presence of other implants or foreign bodies in the head
7. Inability to receive an MRI for any reason
8. Inability to receive cortical stimulation for any reason
9. Coagulation disorders and/or use of anti-thrombotic therapies
10. Platelet count \< 50
11. Diathermy procedures
12. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
13. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
14. Presence of implanted cardiac device (such as a pacemaker or defibrillator)
15. Pregnant women

Primary outcomes:
measure: Extent of resection
timeFrame: Within 1 week after second surgery
measure: Stimulation-induced motor deficits
timeFrame: Within 2 weeks after first surgery
measure: Stimulation-induced language deficits
timeFrame: Within 2 weeks after first surgery
measure: Stimulation-induced side effects
timeFrame: Within 2 weeks after first surgery
measure: Safety of outpatient stimulation-therapy protocol
timeFrame: Up to 8 weeks
measure: Stimulation-induced brain remapping
timeFrame: This data will be obtained intraoperatively during the second surgery
measure: Number of participants with a new neurological deficit
timeFrame: Assessed at 3-month postoperative visit after second surgery
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Medical College of Wisconsin
name: Max Krucoff, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: