Clinical trial NCT01124305: Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Conventional and Customized Instrumentation
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Conventional and Customized Patient Instrumentation
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Knee Arthritis
Keywords: Total Knee Arthroplasty
Instrumentation
Lead sponsor: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2010-05-17
Enrollment: 70
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the surgical time required for primary total knee arthroplasty is significantly less when performed with Customized Patient Instrumentation (CPI) than with conventional instrumentation. Each case will be recorded by video camera, in order to time the length of surgery and each surgical step. The number of surgical trays required for each case will be recorded. As an additional endpoint, the investigators will measure limb and component alignment on x-rays to determine if these two methods achieve equivalent alignment results. The thickness of bone cuts will be compared to the surgical plan and to each other.

The primary hypothesis is that the use of customized patient instrumentation will reduce the operative time required for total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed description: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been developed for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with several potential advantages over traditional instrumentation (TI). Shortened surgical time, fewer surgical instruments, and improved alignment are some of these proposed advantages. We sought to examine these assertions.

52 patients (26 per group) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial comparing CT-based PSI with TI. No difference was seen in average patient age (68 years) or BMI (31) between groups (p=0.84 and p=0.89), although there were more males in the PSI group (14 vs 7, p=0.002). A single surgeon and consistent staff performed the surgeries with the same knee prostheses, and all cases were videotaped to measure the length of surgery and each individual step. Any additional bone cuts, size changes, or ligament releases made to achieve correct alignment and balance were documented. The number of instrument trays opened for each case was recorded. Postoperative long alignment and lateral radiographs were taken to measure the coronal and sagittal plane component alignment and mechanical axis in each patient.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient requires unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

* Body mass index greater than 41
* Previous ipsilateral hip or ankle replacement
* Knee flexion contracture greater than 20 degrees

Primary outcomes:
measure: Length of Surgery
timeFrame: 1 day
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Length of Each Surgical Step (in Seconds)
timeFrame: 1 day
measure: Number of Instrument Trays Required
timeFrame: 1 day
measure: Limb Alignment (Mechanical Axis)
timeFrame: 4 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Alexandria
country: United States
facility: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
state: Virginia
Study officials:
affiliation: Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
name: William G Hamilton, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008 Sep;31(9):927-30. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-21. No abstract available.
citation: Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6.
citation: Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008 Sep;31(9):857-63. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-15.
citation: Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
citation: Watters TS, Mather RC 3rd, Browne JA, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Bolognesi MP. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011 Summer;20(2):112-6.