Clinical trial NCT01522261: The Surgical Benefit and Pt.Tolerability Between Two Different Bowel Cleansing Regimens Performed Prior to Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. Does One Bowel Cleansing Regimen Improve the Surgeons Visual Field Significantly Better Than the Other.
Official title: The Use of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery (MBP)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Keywords: Mechanical Bowel Prep
Lead sponsor: Boston Urogynecology Associates
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2012-01-31
Enrollment: 176
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 90
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL

Brief summary: Does mechanical bowel preparation (complete bowel cleansing)help the Surgeon with visualization of the operative field during laparoscopic pelvic reconstructive surgery?

Detailed description: Patients will be randomized to receive a complete MBP or not prior to their surgical procedure. All patients will use 1 fleets enema the night before surgery and one the morning of surgery to ensure that the rectum is empty of all stool. This will be done since some surgeons use a rectal probe in the rectum to help with manipulation during the procedure. Stool in the rectal vault could contaminate the surgical field and lead to an infection.

Patients will be randomized at their pre-op visit and provided instructions according to the group assignment. On the day of surgery patients will be asked to complete a questionnaire in the pre-op holding area to assess their overnight symptoms including insomnia, weakness, abdominal distention, nausea, thirst and overall tolerability of the Bowel Preparation assigned.

Immediately after surgery, the primary surgeon will be asked to complete a visual analog score sheet evaluating the ease of the procedure with regard to retraction of the large and small bowel to help with visualization of the sacral promontory, retraction from posterior cul-de-sac, and maintaining adequate positioning after retraction. All surgeons (attendings, fellows, and residents) will be blinded re: the patients group assignment. Each primary surgeon will be asked to assign a final grade to the procedure as easy, medium, or difficult based on overall bowel retraction.

At their 2 week follow up visit patients will be asked to report return of bowel function (first bowel movement or flatus) in # of days after surgery and incidents of stool leakage post op.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

All patients undergoing the following laparoscopic pelvic reconstructive procedures for pelvic organ prolapse:

* Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy
* Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
* Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy
* Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension

Who understand and are willing to comply with the study requirements, including agreeing to answer the preoperative and postoperative questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

* Previous abdominal or laparoscopic colon surgery (not including transrectal procedures)
* History of abdominal malignancy
* History of surgical debulking for previous malignancy
* Non-english speaking
* Pregnancy
* Hx of abdomino-pelvic radiation
* Contraindications to Sodium Phosphate
* Contraindications to laparoscopic surgery

Primary outcomes:
measure: To determine whether there is there an added benefit in using a MBP with regard to positioning of the large and small bowel for exposure of key anatomic structures during pelvic reconstructive surgical procedures.
timeFrame: Surgeons will be asked to complete a questionnaire re: their impressions of the visual field on immediately Post op.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: To evaluate whether MBP (total bowel cleansing) delays the return of bowel function and/or increases the risk of perioperative leakage of stool (fecal incontinence)post operatively.
timeFrame: We will be following the subject from the day of surgery through 2 weeks post op.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cambridge
country: United States
facility: Boston Urogynecology Associates
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Boston Urogynecology Associates
name: Lekha Hota, M.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Adelowo AO, Hacker MR, Modest AM, Apostolis CA, Disciullo AJ, Hanaway KJ, Elkadry EE, Rosenblatt PL, Rogers KJ, Hota LS. The Use of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000346.