Clinical trial NCT05685459: Position and Communication Skills Simulation
Official title: Position and Communication Skills Simulation: Comparison of Two Simulation Models in Nursing Student
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Comparing to Effect Two Simulation Models
Keywords: Standardized patient
Simulation
Nurse
Positioning skills
Communication skills
Lead sponsor: Sakarya University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-01-17
Enrollment: 60
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 26
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The population of the study consisted of 112 second-semester nursing students who took the "Nursing Fundamentals" course in the spring semester of the 2021-2022 academic year, and the sample included volunteers who took the course for the first time. A power analysis was performed on the G\*Power (v3.1.7) software to determine the sample size. The power of a study is expressed as 1-β (β = probability of type II error), and in general, studies should have 80% power. According to Cohen's effect size coefficients, assuming that the evaluations between two independent groups would have a large effect size (d = 0.8), the sample size was calculated as 60 subjects. Students were randomly assigned to groups using computer software.
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: The goal of this study was to compare two different simulation applications in developing the positioning skill, one of the most common nursing practices, and the communication skill, which forms the basis of nursing practices.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Volunteering to participate in the research
* First-year nursing students
* Not have training in simulation

Exclusion Criteria:

* Not meeting the inclusion criteria

Primary outcomes:
measure: Comparing of two simulation models
timeFrame: 1 month
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Therapeutic Communication Skills Questionnaire for Nursing Students
timeFrame: 1 month
measure: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale
timeFrame: 1 month
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Sakarya
country: Turkey
facility: Ozlem Dogu
state: Serdivan
Study officials:
affiliation: Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart University
name: Şengül ÜZEN CURA, Doctorate
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Berman, A.,Snyder, S., &Frandsen, G. (2016). Fundamentals of nursing: concept, process, andpractice (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
citation: Potter, P.A., Perry, A.G., &Stockert, P.A. Fundamentals of nursing(10, revised ed.). (2021). St. Louis:Elsevier.
citation: Wilfong DN, Falsetti DJ, McKinnon JL, Daniel LH, Wan QC. The effects of virtual intravenous and patient simulator training compared to the traditional approach of teaching nurses: a research project on peripheral i.v. catheter insertion. J Infus Nurs. 2011 Jan-Feb;34(1):55-62. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31820219e2.
citation: McWilliams LA, Malecha A. Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators. Nurs Res Pract. 2017;2017:4685157. doi: 10.1155/2017/4685157. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
citation: Vidal VL, Ohaeri BM, John P, Helen D. Virtual reality and the traditional method for phlebotomy training among college of nursing students in Kuwait: implications for nursing education and practice. J Infus Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;36(5):349-55. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e318243172f.
citation: Ignacio J, Dolmans D, Scherpbier A, Rethans JJ, Chan S, Liaw SY. Comparison of standardized patients with high-fidelity simulators for managing stress and improving performance in clinical deterioration: A mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 May 23.
citation: Uzen Cura S, Kocatepe V, Yildirim D, Kucukakgun H, Atay S, Unver V. Examining Knowledge, Skill, Stress, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence Levels of Nursing Students in Three Different Simulation Modalities. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Aug;14(3):158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
citation: Doolen J, Giddings M, Johnson M, Guizado de Nathan G, O Badia L. An evaluation of mental health simulation with standardized patients. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014 Mar 12;11:/j/ijnes.2014.11.issue-1/ijnes-2013-0075/ijnes-2013-0075.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0075.
citation: Quail M, Brundage SB, Spitalnick J, Allen PJ, Beilby J. Student self-reported communication skills, knowledge and confidence across standardised patient, virtual and traditional clinical learning environments. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 27;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0577-5.
citation: Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt CR. Elements in scenario-based simulation associated with nursing students' self-confidence and satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2019 Sep 27;7(1):170-179. doi: 10.1002/nop2.375. eCollection 2020 Jan.
citation: MacLean S, Kelly M, Geddes F, Della P. Use of simulated patients to develop communication skills in nursing education: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jan;48:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
citation: Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Garcia-Sanjuan S, Escribano S, Fernandez-Alcantara M, Martinez-Riera JR, Julia-Sanchis R. Mixed-method study on the satisfaction of a high-fidelity simulation program in a sample of nursing-degree students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104858. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104858. Epub 2021 Mar 6.