Clinical trial NCT03322293: Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis
Official title: Tolerability and Efficacy of Daylight Aminolevulinic-acid-photodynamic Therapy (ALA-PDT) Compared With Conventional ALA-PDT for Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Face or Scalp
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Actinic Keratoses
Keywords: Actinic Keratoses
photodynamic therapy
aminolevulinic acid
precancerous skin lesion
Lead sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-10-26
Enrollment: 24
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Randomized (1:1:1), single-blind controlled trial with parallel group design
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This is a randomized, single-blind controlled trial with parallel group design to determine whether daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT) affords a reduction in treatment symptoms of pain, burning, and pruritus as measured by 1) symptom level during the treatment period and 2) pain at the end of treatment exposure.

Detailed description: Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous skin lesions that arise on sun-damaged skin. Treatment is aimed at preventing progression to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). First-line therapy for clinically apparent lesions includes cryotherapy and curettage; and field therapy options are topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT involves the topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or one of its derivatives, as a photosensitizing agent. In response, rapidly proliferating, dysplastic cells preferentially accumulate protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). When PpIX is activated by blue or red light, singlet oxygen species are produced, resulting in cell death. PDT is beneficial due to its brief treatment course and efficacy in clearing AK. However, its main drawbacks are the adverse effects of pain, burning, pruritus, erythema, crusting, and inflammation associated with treatment. While conventional PDT uses red or blue artificial light to activate a high concentration of accumulated protoporphyrins, daylight PDT uses natural daylight to activate lower levels of protoporphyrins in a continuous manner. Daylight PDT, when compared with conventional PDT, has been associated with significantly less pain while achieving comparable efficacy for the treatment of AK. Daylight PDT is also more cost-effective and reduces the amount of time spent in clinic. Previous randomized studies comparing daylight PDT with conventional PDT have largely used methyl-aminolevulinate as the photosensitizer, have been intra-individual comparative studies, and have been performed in Nordic countries. Because the effective light dose from natural daylight depends on geographic location and seasonal and weather changes, randomized trials in different geographic and environmental conditions are of interest. The proposed randomized clinical trial investigates the tolerability and efficacy of daylight ALA-PDT for the treatment of AK in San Francisco for the first time; subjects will be randomized to various treatment arms, as opposed to previous split-face and intra-individual studies.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults at least 18 years old.
* Subjects must be able to read, sign, and understand the informed consent
* Subjects have at least 4 and no more than 20 clinically typical, visible actinic keratoses in the target treatment area on the face or scalp.
* Subject must be willing to forego any other treatments for AK in the treatment area on the face or scalp, during the study period, and for 14 days prior to screening; including cryotherapy, topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate.
* Subjects who have previously received PDT must undergo at least an 8-week washout period prior to enrollment in study.
* Subject must be willing and able to participate in the study and to comply with all study requirements including concomitant medication and other treatment restrictions, and telephone interview.
* If subject is a female of childbearing potential she must have a negative urine pregnancy test result prior to study treatment initiation and must agree to use an approved method of birth control while enrolled in the study. Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study period are excluded from the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Subjects with any dermatologic disease in the treatment area that may be exacerbated by the treatment proposed or that might impair the evaluation of AKs.
* Subjects who are currently participating in another clinical study or have completed another clinical study with an investigational drug or device on the study area within 30 days prior to study treatment initiation.
* Subjects with any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for the trial.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Treatment Symptoms
timeFrame: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Percent Change in AK Lesion Count
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Reduction of AK Counts
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Change in Local Skin Reaction From Pre-treatment to 12 Weeks Post-treatment
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Peak Pain Score at Day 8 Post-treatment
timeFrame: 8 days post-treatment
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: San Francisco
country: United States
facility: UCSF Dermatology
state: California
Study officials:
affiliation: University of California, San Francisco
name: Sarah Arron, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: