Clinical trial NCT04488809: Comparison the Effects of Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running
Official title: Comparison the Effects of Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running on Lower Extremity Anaerobic Exercise Performance in Sedentary Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Phase: NA
Conditions: Sedentary Behavior
Keywords: Exercise
Running
Anaerobic Performance
Agility
Lead sponsor: Izmir Katip Celebi University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-07-28
Enrollment: 72
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 30
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different exercise programs as 'Deep Water Running' and 'Treadmill Running' in sedentary young adults.

Detailed description: Rapid and explosive movements such as jumping or stair climbing need anaerobic performance. Anaerobic performance is negatively affected by sedentary behaviour due to loss of muscle strength and endurance. Exercise is an effective method to increase muscle strength and physical performance.

Exercising in water has unique physiological characteristics such as buoyancy, hydrostatic pressure, and metacentric effect. In addition, exercising in high speeds in water leads strengthening. Deep water running is employed to imitate the running on land. It is advocated that deep water running might result additional benefits than running on land. Therefore, the effect of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of deep water running and treadmill running in sedentary young adults.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Being sedentary according to International Physical Activity Questionnaire
* Consent of the participant

Exclusion Criteria:

* Problems related to musculoskeletal, neurologic, and cardiopulmonary systems in last six months
* Any contraindication to exercise in water (water fear, allergy to chlorine)
* No willingness to continue in the study

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in lower extremity anaerobic performance
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in lower extremity strength
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in agility
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in trunk muscle endurance
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in fatigue
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in total body mass
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in fat mass
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in fat free muscle mass
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
measure: Change in basal metabolism rate
timeFrame: At baseline and 8 weeks later
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: İzmir
country: Turkey
facility: Izmir Katip Celebi University
Study officials:
affiliation: Izmir Katip Celebi University
name: Deniz Bayraktar, PT, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kelly BT, Roskin LA, Kirkendall DT, Speer KP. Shoulder muscle activation during aquatic and dry land exercises in nonimpaired subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Apr;30(4):204-10. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.4.204.
citation: Reichert T, Kanitz AC, Delevatti RS, Bagatini NC, Barroso BM, Kruel LF. Continuous and interval training programs using deep water running improves functional fitness and blood pressure in the older adults. Age (Dordr). 2016 Feb;38(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9882-5. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
citation: Cuesta-Vargas AI, Buchan J, Arroyo-Morales M. A multimodal physiotherapy programme plus deep water running for improving cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12114. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
citation: Cuesta-Vargas AI, Adams N, Salazar JA, Belles A, Hazanas S, Arroyo-Morales M. Deep water running and general practice in primary care for non-specific low back pain versus general practice alone: randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;31(7):1073-8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1977-5. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
citation: Wilber RL, Moffatt RJ, Scott BE, Lee DT, Cucuzzo NA. Influence of water run training on the maintenance of aerobic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Aug;28(8):1056-62. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199608000-00017.
citation: Broman G, Quintana M, Lindberg T, Jansson E, Kaijser L. High intensity deep water training can improve aerobic power in elderly women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Sep;98(2):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0237-2. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
citation: Bayraktar D, Savci S, Altug-Gucenmez O, Manci E, Makay B, Ilcin N, Unsal E. The effects of 8-week water-running program on exercise capacity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Jan;39(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4209-8. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
citation: Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704060-00001. No abstract available.
citation: Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8.
citation: Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.
citation: McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):941-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4.
citation: Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, Karabudak R. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007 Mar;30(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4.
citation: Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Doman D, Murgatroyd PR, Prentice AM. Evaluation of the novel Tanita body-fat analyser to measure body composition by comparison with a four-compartment model. Br J Nutr. 2000 Feb;83(2):115-22. doi: 10.1017/s0007114500000155.
citation: Vandarakis D, Salacinski AJ, Broeder CE. A comparison of COSMED metabolic systems for the determination of resting metabolic rate. Res Sports Med. 2013;21(2):187-94. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2012.757226.