Clinical trial NCT05257954: Frailty in Patient Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.
Official title: Frailty in Patient Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure The Frail-LAAC Study
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Conditions: Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Frailty
Lead sponsor: Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-02-25
Enrollment: 500
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients ≥18 years old undergoing Transcatheter LAAC with any approved device

Brief summary: To assess the prevalence and severity of frailty in patients undergoing LAAC, as well as its association to peri-procedural and long-term outcomes and quality of life.

Detailed description: Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and relative or absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC).

Procedural safety and success are now excellent with approximately 98% of successful procedures without major complications. LAAC seems to offer persisting protection against ischemic events in long-term reports, while also decreasing bleeding risk by reducing antithrombotic treatment intensity. However, patients undergoing LAAC in real-world practice are a high-risk population with a high rate of adverse events, mainly not related to the LAAC device-procedure. As a prophylactic intervention, the beneficial effects of LAAC increase over time, as more potential adverse events (ischemic and haemorrhagic) are prevented. Thus, it took approximately 5 years to reach cost-effectiveness (favoring LAAC versus oral anticoagulation) in the pooled data from PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL randomized controlled trials. Patients that experience early death after LAAC do not fully benefit from the costly procedure - that can be therefore considered futile. In a recent study, close to 1 on 5 LAAC recipient had either died or suffered from a major ischemic event within the first year after the procedure highlighting the need for better patient selection before LAAC.

The definition of frailty is nonconsensual and has constantly evolved in the literature. Nonetheless, there is a general agreement that frailty is a multidimensional concept involving many domains (such as nutrition, mobility, strength and cognitive) and that frail patients are a high-risk population and vulnerable to stressors and adverse outcomes. Thus, considering this global definition, assessing frailty using multidomain scales is more appropriate to discriminate frail to non-frail patients.

Frailty and its association to adverse events are well-known in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite being performed in a high-risk population, frailty has not yet been studied in LAAC although it could be a potent indicator for futile or harmful procedures. The implementation of frailty assessment into the routine practice could help identify vulnerable patients who will most likely less benefit from the LAAC procedure. Therefore, in this prospective multicenter trial, the investigators seek to explore frailty and its consequences in LAAC recipients.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Transcatheter LAAC with any approved device
* Age ≥18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to provide informed consent
* Severe neuropsychiatric impairment

Primary outcomes:
measure: Prevalence of frailty
timeFrame: Baseline (before transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure)
measure: Prevalence of frailty
timeFrame: Baseline (before transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure)
measure: Rate of all-cause mortality
timeFrame: 1-year follow-up
measure: Rate of ischemic events
timeFrame: 1-year follow-up
measure: Rate of all-cause mortality and ischemic events
timeFrame: 1-year follow-up
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Rate of All-cause mortality
timeFrame: 2, 3, 4 and 5-year follow-up
measure: Rate of ischemic events
timeFrame: 2, 3, 4 and 5-year follow-up
measure: Rate of all-cause mortality and ischemic events
timeFrame: 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year follow-up
measure: Rate of Rehospitalisation
timeFrame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year follow-up
measure: Number of participants discharged to a healthcare facility
timeFrame: 1-month follow-up
measure: Rate of bleeding
timeFrame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year follow-up
measure: Changes in quality of life
timeFrame: Baseline (before transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure) and 1-year follow-up
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Quebec
country: Canada
facility: IUCPQ_UL
Study officials:
References:
citation: Asmarats L, Rodes-Cabau J. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Devices and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005359. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005359.
citation: Boersma LV, Schmidt B, Betts TR, Sievert H, Tamburino C, Teiger E, Pokushalov E, Kische S, Schmitz T, Stein KM, Bergmann MW; EWOLUTION investigators. Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry. Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug;37(31):2465-74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv730. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
citation: Landmesser U, Tondo C, Camm J, Diener HC, Paul V, Schmidt B, Settergren M, Teiger E, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Hildick-Smith D. Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: one-year follow-up from the prospective global Amulet observational registry. EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 3;14(5):e590-e597. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00344.
citation: Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar S, Gibson DN, Price MJ, Huber K, Horton RP, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Gordon NT, Holmes DR Jr; PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
citation: Holmes DR Jr, Reddy VY, Gordon NT, Delurgio D, Doshi SK, Desai AJ, Stone JE Jr, Kar S. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.
citation: Mesnier J, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Peral V, Nombela-Franco L, Freixa X, Laffond AE, Mas-Llado C, McInerney A, Regueiro A, O'Hara G, Rodes-Cabau J. Ten-Year Outcomes Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Absolute or Relative Contraindications to Chronic Anticoagulation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug;14(8):e010821. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010821. Epub 2021 Jul 16. No abstract available.
citation: Panikker S, Lord J, Jarman JW, Armstrong S, Jones DG, Haldar S, Butcher C, Khan H, Mantziari L, Nicol E, Hussain W, Clague JR, Foran JP, Markides V, Wong T. Outcomes and costs of left atrial appendage closure from randomized controlled trial and real-world experience relative to oral anticoagulation. Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 7;37(46):3470-3482. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw048. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
citation: Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6.
citation: Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
citation: Kim DH, Kim CA, Placide S, Lipsitz LA, Marcantonio ER. Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Outcomes at 6 Months or Later in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;165(9):650-660. doi: 10.7326/M16-0652. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
citation: Rodriguez-Manas L, Feart C, Mann G, Vina J, Chatterji S, Chodzko-Zajko W, Gonzalez-Colaco Harmand M, Bergman H, Carcaillon L, Nicholson C, Scuteri A, Sinclair A, Pelaez M, Van der Cammen T, Beland F, Bickenbach J, Delamarche P, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Rockwood K, Rodriguez Artalejo F, Serviddio G, Vega E; FOD-CC group (Appendix 1). Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):62-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls119. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
citation: Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.
citation: Hinterbuchner L, Strohmer B, Hammerer M, Prinz E, Hoppe UC, Schernthaner C. Frailty scoring in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Oct;15(6):384-97. doi: 10.1177/1474515115596640. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
citation: Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.