Clinical trial NCT03255005: Endomina Controlled Study
Official title: A Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina) as an Aid for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Obesity
Keywords: obesity
endoscopy
endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
Lead sponsor: Erasme University Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-08-21
Enrollment: 72
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SEQUENTIAL
Intervention model description: Group A: treatment J0 + Diet 1 year Group B: Diet 6 months - Treatment - Diet 1 year
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty (EVG) using an endoluminal-suturing device. Safety will also be characterized, in particular by the incidence of all Adverse Device Effects (ADEs). A secondary endpoint is to compare a delayed treatment control group (diet alone; crossover at 6 months) with a treatment group (EVG plus diet). Other secondary endpoints include improvements in other obesity measures.

Detailed description: Surgery is currently the only effective treatment for morbid obesity and can be divided into restrictive surgeries (Lap Band and Sleeve gastrectomy), malabsorptive surgeries (Biliary pancreatic deviation and duodenal switch) or a combination of both (RYGBP).

This latter technique is the most common and most effective surgical procedure performed worldwide and has been processed to be an effective treatment of morbid obesity and its complications, achieving excess weight loss of 65 to 80 %; 1-2 years after surgery.

Vertical gastric plication is a novel surgical approach for reducing the stomach capacity. Anterior surface plication and greater curvature plication are variations of vertical gastric plication that reduce the gastric capacity through infolding of the anterior surface or greater curvature of the stomach, respectively. These approaches have been tested, with positive results.

A transoral or endoluminal approach (i.e. a procedure that requires no incision, because access is granted through the mouth) offers the potential for additional benefit to the patient, because the procedures continue to become more and more minimally invasive.

Advances in endoluminal devices are now allowing clinicians the ability to begin exploring bariatric procedures performed via flexible endoscopy. Although these procedures may not be as effective as their surgical counterparts, these less-invasive options may relieve patients of the significant risks associated with surgery and might become part of the armamentarium of obesity management.

Endomina (Endo Tools Therapeutics, Gosselies, Belgium) is a CE marked device that may be attached to an endoscope inside the body and allows remote actuation of the device during a peroral intervention. It offers the possibilities of making transoral full thickness tissue apposition and may allow performing, via a transoral route, large plications with tight serosa to serosa apposition.

After a first trial on pigs (safety), a second trial on human patients was performed. This trial included 11 patients treated with the same technique. There were no complications and the short term results were encouraging with 41% EWL at 6 month.

A multicentric trial NCT02582229 entitled: " A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina TM) as an Aid for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction. " is ongoing and inclusion of patients ended in December 2016 with a total of 51 patients included in 3 European centers. Early results of the trial had showed that dietician follow-up is an important part of the success. During that time implementation of the procedure had been done.

The aim of this trial is to compare a control group (diet alone) with a treatment group (Endomina procedure plus diet).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age between 18-65 years;
2. Class I or class II obesity (i.e. BMI between 30 to 40 kg/m²);
3. Must be able to comply with all study requirements for the duration of the study as outlined in the protocol. This includes complying with the visit schedule as well as study specific procedures such as: clinical assessment, endoscopy, radiography, as well as laboratory investigations;
4. Must be able to understand and be willing to provide written informed consent;
5. Must live within 75 km of the treatment site;
6. Had followed the bariatric multidisciplinary workup (blood analyses, dietician, psychologist and doctor appointments).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Achalasia and any other esophageal motility disorders;
2. Severe esophagitis;
3. Gastro-duodenal ulcer;
4. Heart diseases: unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the past year, or heart disease classified within the New York Heart Association's Class III or IV functional capacity;
5. Hypertension: uncontrolled hypertension during last 3 months;
6. Diabetes: uncontrolled diabetes (on insulin therapy or oral therapy with Hba1c \> 10%);
7. TBWL \>5% over the last 6 months;
8. Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary disease or cancer;
9. GI stenosis or obstruction;
10. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or willing to become pregnant in the coming 18 months;
11. Previous bariatric surgery, balloon or other endoscopic obesity-related therapy;
12. Anticoagulant therapy;
13. Impending gastric surgery 60 days post intervention;
14. Currently participating in other study

Primary outcomes:
measure: Incidence of all Adverse Device Effects
timeFrame: one year from procedure
measure: Weight loss
timeFrame: one year from procedure
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Weight loss at 6 months
timeFrame: at 6 months after the procedure (treatment group)
measure: More than 15% weight loss
timeFrame: one year from procedure
measure: Quality of life
timeFrame: one year from procedure
measure: TBWL
timeFrame: one year from procedure
measure: Weight and height
timeFrame: one year from procedure
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Brussels
country: Belgium
facility: Gastroenterology Department Erasme Hospital
city: Marseille
country: France
facility: APHM Hopital Marseille Nord Hepato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive
Study officials:
References:
citation: ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force and ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Kumar N, Edmundowicz SA, Jonnalagadda S, Larsen M, Sullivan S, Thompson CC, Banerjee S. ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):425-38.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1964. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
citation: Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, Pareja BC, Callejas F, Pareja JC. Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008 Jun;18(6):648-51. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9265-1. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
citation: Menchaca HJ, Harris JL, Thompson SE, Mootoo M, Michalek VN, Buchwald H. Gastric plication: preclinical study of durability of serosa-to-serosa apposition. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jan-Feb;7(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
citation: Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R. Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;68(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.061. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
citation: Paxton JH, Matthews JB. The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2005 Jan;15(1):24-34. doi: 10.1381/0960892052993477.
citation: Huberty V, Ibrahim M, Hiernaux M, Chau A, Dugardeyn S, Deviere J. Safety and feasibility of an endoluminal-suturing device for endoscopic gastric reduction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):833-837. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
citation: ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force; ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Edmundowicz SA, Jonnalagadda S, Kumar N, Larsen M, Sullivan S, Thompson CC, Banerjee S. Endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May;81(5):1073-86. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Mar 28. No abstract available.
citation: ASGE/ASMBS Task Force on Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy; Ginsberg GG, Chand B, Cote GA, Dallal RM, Edmundowicz SA, Nguyen NT, Pryor A, Thompson CC. A pathway to endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):943-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.053. No abstract available.
citation: Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.
citation: Huberty V, Boskoski I, Bove V, Van Ouytsel P, Costamagna G, Barthet MA, Deviere J. Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty in addition to lifestyle modification: short-term efficacy in a controlled randomised trial. Gut. 2020 Oct 28:gutjnl-2020-322026. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322026. Online ahead of print.