Clinical trial NCT04024709: Long-term Results of Per-oral Pyloromyotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis
Official title: Long-term Results of Per-oral Pyloromyotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Gastroparesis
Keywords: G-POEM
gastroparesis
POP
oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy
Lead sponsor: University Hospital, Limoges
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-07-18
Enrollment: 129
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: CASE_ONLY
Time perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients with gastroparesis

Brief summary: This is a large multicenter retrospective French cohort conducted in seven French centers that had performed at least five G-POEM procedures at the end of 2017. All patients treated by G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis since April 30, 2014 (first case of GPOEM in France) in these seven centers were included in this study and followed until April 2019. The data were collected retrospectively regarding medical and technical data, and then prospectively for the following data, which were included in a database for each center and combined for analysis.

Gastric Cardinal Symptoms Index (GCSI) was used to evaluate symptoms and their severity. It applies a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 (5 being the highest score) for three subscales: satiety (mean of four items), nausea/vomiting (mean of three items), and bloating (mean of two items). The total GCSI score was the mean of the three subscales. A GCSI score ≥ 2.6 is considered moderate gastroparesis and ≥ 3 is considered severe.

Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) was used to confirm delayed gastric emptying, since it is considered the gold standard according to the American Society of Neurogastroenterology. Patients consume a radiolabeled meal, receive imaging at specific time-points to determine gastric retention. The exam is pathological when retention is \> 90% after 1 hour, \> 60% after 2 hours (H2), \> 30% after 3 hours (H3), and \> 10% after 4 hours (H4). All but one center performed the GES according to the US guidelines: that center performed a 3-hour GES with a local validation of a threshold of 30% retention at H3 to define delayed gastric emptying. A %H4 retention \> 30% was defined as severe delayed gastric emptying.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* treatment by G-POEM during the study period,
* at least a 1-year follow-up, and
* GCSI evaluation before and 1 year after G-POEM.

Exclusion Criteria:

* missing GCSI before and/or 12 months after G-POEM,
* non-pathological GES before G-POEM: delayed gastric emptying was defined as t ½ \> 113 min and %H4 retention \> 10%, and
* loss to follow-up or death before 12 months

Primary outcomes:
measure: Clinical success of G-POEM
timeFrame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Incidence of adverse events of pylorotomy
timeFrame: 2 years
measure: Clinical success of G-POEM
timeFrame: 2 years
measure: Delayed gastric emptying after the procedure
timeFrame: 2 years
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Lille
country: France
facility: University Hospital
city: Limoges
country: France
facility: University Hospital
city: Lyon
country: France
facility: Hospices Civiles Lyon
city: Marseille
country: France
facility: University Hospital
city: Nice
country: France
facility: University Hospital
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Cochin Hospital
city: Rennes
country: France
facility: University Hospital
Study officials:
References:
citation: Gonzalez JM, Benezech A, Vitton V, Barthet M. G-POEM with antro-pyloromyotomy for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: mid-term follow-up and factors predicting outcome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;46(3):364-370. doi: 10.1111/apt.14132. Epub 2017 May 15.
citation: Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S, Carr-Locke D, Bapaye A, Benias PC, Serouya S, Dorwat S, Chaves DM, Artifon E, de Moura EG, Kumbhari V, Chavez YH, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Ismail A, Chen YI, Chung H. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: results from the first multicenter study on endoscopic pyloromyotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.048. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
citation: Jacques J, Pagnon L, Hure F, Legros R, Crepin S, Fauchais AL, Palat S, Ducrotte P, Marin B, Fontaine S, Boubaddi NE, Clement MP, Sautereau D, Loustaud-Ratti V, Gourcerol G, Monteil J. Peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy is efficacious and safe for refractory gastroparesis: prospective trial with assessment of pyloric function. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):40-49. doi: 10.1055/a-0628-6639. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
citation: Revicki DA, Camilleri M, Kuo B, Szarka LA, McCormack J, Parkman HP. Evaluating symptom outcomes in gastroparesis clinical trials: validity and responsiveness of the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index-Daily Diary (GCSI-DD). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 May;24(5):456-63, e215-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01879.x. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
citation: Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, Hasler WL, Lin HC, Maurer AH, McCallum RW, Nowak T, Nusynowitz ML, Parkman HP, Shreve P, Szarka LA, Snape WJ Jr, Ziessman HA; American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008 Mar;36(1):44-54. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.107.048116. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
citation: Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, Abell TL, Gerson L; American College of Gastroenterology. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):18-37; quiz 38. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.373. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
citation: Ragi O, Jacques J, Branche J, Leblanc S, Vanbiervliet G, Legros R, Pioche M, Rivory J, Chaussade S, Barret M, Wallenhorst T, Barthet M, Kerever S, Gonzalez JM. One-year results of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a French multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2021 May;53(5):480-490. doi: 10.1055/a-1205-5686. Epub 2020 Jul 21.