Clinical trial NCT04983498: Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy
Official title: Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy Patients Receiving Moderate Sedation
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Enhanced Recovery Pathway
Endoscopy
Lead sponsor: Northwestern University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-07-30
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to compare an Enhanced Recovery Pathway to the current pre-operative/recovery practices of the endoscopy department on patient post-procedure outcomes.

Detailed description: Every 4th to 5th patient that checks in to the endoscopy department for their procedure will be screened for eligibility requirements. If eligible for the study, the patient will be informed about the study and potential risks. All patients giving written informed consent will be enrolled into the enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) \[nursing managed ERP: goal-directed fluid management (Lactated Ringer's Solution at 5mL/kg/hr), PONV prophylaxis for an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room), and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure\] for their procedure.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Outpatient colonoscopy under moderate sedation
* Colonoscopy Indications: Screening

Exclusion Criteria:

* More than one sedation procedure scheduled same day
* Allergy to ondansetron
* Past PONV requiring scopolamine patches
* Diagnoses: ESRD, heart failure, cirrhosis, long QT syndrome
* Patients requiring fluid restrictions, such as dialysis patients
* Post-procedure NPO requirements, such as procedure-related NPO status (stent placement, pneumatic dilation, etc.) or second procedure in another location
* High Fall Risk Patients
* Adults unable to consent
* Pregnant patients

Primary outcomes:
measure: To compare recovery time stamps before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
timeFrame: 1-2 hours
measure: To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
timeFrame: 1-2 hours
Secondary outcomes:
measure: To compare patient satisfaction scores before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.
timeFrame: 15 minutes
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chicago
country: United States
facility: Northwestern Memorial Hospital
state: Illinois
Study officials:
affiliation: Northwestern Medicine
name: Angela Maeder, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Alghanem SM, Massad IM, Rashed EM, Abu-Ali HM, Daradkeh SS. Optimization of anesthesia antiemetic measures versus combination therapy using dexamethasone or ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0567-3. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
citation: Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov 16;5(11):527-33. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.527.
citation: Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R, Chan E, Kim MP. The Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs and Their Application in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-2-77.
citation: Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196.
citation: Ellett ML. Review of propofol and auxiliary medications used for sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;33(4):284-95; quiz 296-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3181eac371.
citation: Crenshaw JT, Winslow EH. Preoperative fasting: old habits die hard. Am J Nurs. 2002 May;102(5):36-44; quiz 45. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200205000-00033.
citation: Gan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting--can it be eliminated? JAMA. 2002 Mar 13;287(10):1233-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.10.1233. No abstract available.
citation: Joliat GR, Ljungqvist O, Wasylak T, Peters O, Demartines N. Beyond surgery: clinical and economic impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3824-0.
citation: Lichtenstein GR, Cohen LB, Uribarri J. Review article: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy--the importance of adequate hydration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):633-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03406.x.
citation: Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
citation: Saraghi M. Intraoperative Fluids and Fluid Management for Ambulatory Dental Sedation and General Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2015 Winter;62(4):168-76; quiz 177. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.4.168.
citation: Shaikh SI, Nagarekha D, Hegade G, Marutheesh M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: A simple yet complex problem. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):388-396. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.179310.
citation: Som A, Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Arora MK, Baidya DK. Combination of 5-HT3 Antagonist and Dexamethasone Is Superior to 5-HT3 Antagonist Alone for PONV Prophylaxis After Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1418-1426. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001617.
citation: Weinberg L, Faulkner M, Tan CO, Liu DH, Tay S, Nikfarjam M, Peyton P, Story D. Fluid prescription practices of anesthesiologists managing patients undergoing elective colonoscopy: an observational study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 10;7:356. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-356.