Clinical trial NCT01711580: Re-irradiation of High Grade Gliomas: a Quality of Life Study
Official title: Re-irradiation of High Grade Gliomas: a Quality of Life Study
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Conditions: Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma
Keywords: Recurrent glioma
Quality of life
Glioblastoma multiforme
Anaplastic glioma
Cognition
Re-irradiation
Lead sponsor: Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2012-10-22
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: The study population will consist of subjects with a histologically proven high-grade glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma or glioblastoma multiforme) at primary diagnosis, who are now eligible for re-irradation because of a recurrence.

Brief summary: Patients with a high grade glioma have an increasing overall survival and progression free survival after initial treatment. Because of a better performance status these patients are more often eligible for re-treatment with for example radiotherapy. However, to date only a few prospective studies on re-irradiation of gliomas exist and very little is known about the effects of re-irradiation on quality of life and cognition. This trial is designed to longitudinally establish the effects of re-irradiation on quality of life, cognition and physical performance in patients with a high grade glioma. Based on the currently available information the investigators hypothesize that quality of life after re-irradiation can be kept stable until further tumour progression.

Detailed description: Current treatment regimes, with the addition of temozolomide, have improved progression-free survival as well as overall survival for patients with a high grade glioma. The median overall survival (MOS) for patients with a glioblastoma (GBM) is 14.6 months, with a progression free survival (PFS) of 6.9 months.

Due to longer survival and a better performance status, patients often reach a point at which re-treatment is feasible. Treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma can include surgery, chemotherapy and re-irradiation. Re-irradiation of patients with recurrent high grade glioma is slowly becoming standard of care. It provides a comparable overall survival to palliative chemotherapy. In case of GBM there is a median time to progression after treatment of 20-27 weeks and a MOS of 26 to 60 weeks.

Patients with tumor recurrence have a significantly worse quality of life compared to patients without recurrence at the same follow-up. They experience significantly more problems with physical functioning (e.g. motor dysfunction, weakness of legs, visual disorders), work or other daily activities, mental health (e.g. future uncertainty) and general health.

With regard to re-irradiation, current available data is mostly provided by retrospective studies which often lack solid quality of life data. Endpoints include e.g. performance status, clinical (neurological) status and decreased steroid requirement after treatment. These endpoints are however inadequate to determine quality of life accurately.

Several studies have used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the brain cancer module (QLQ-BN20) scales to assess quality of life. The latter consists of 20 items including visual disorder, motor dysfunction, various disease symptoms, treatment toxicity and future uncertainty. A change of 10 points or more on these scales can be considered clinically relevant.

To date only Ernst-Stecken and colleagues have used the EORTC QLQ-C30 to prospectively evaluate the quality of life in patients with a recurrent malignant glioma after radiotherapy. In this study patients were treated with hypofractionation. The quality of life questionnaire score could be kept stable in two thirds of patients with a median follow-up of 9 months. They conclude that hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is an effective treatment that helps to maintain quality of life for an acceptable period, comparable to the results found with chemotherapeutic regimes.

In patients with glioma, the tumor, radiotherapy as well as chemotherapy can disrupt cognitive function. Cognitive functioning can be evaluated by a cognitive screening instrument and/or comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries. The most well-known and convenient screening instrument is the Mini Mental-State Examination (MMSE). However, the MMSE is developed to assess dementia and does not include items related to executive function. As such, the MMSE is insufficient to assess frontal-subcortical network dysfunction associated with cognitive damage after irradiation. More sensitive cognitive tests should be administered to determine the effects of re-irradiation on cognition. There is however still little consensus on which test should be used. Although comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries are most sensitive, a brief cognitive screening is preferable in the present setting. For this trial, the investigators intend to use a number of relevant standard tests including the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R, the Trail Making Test and Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) as suggested by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The Stroop colour-word test (Stroop) is added to the battery in order to assess visual attention.

Physical functioning has a major impact on quality of life in patients with cancer. A number of studies have investigated the effects of exercise on physical functioning. They have shown, predominantly in patients with breast cancer, that exercise has beneficial effects on health and well-being. Physical performance can be measured by several means. The hand grip strength (HGS) test has been validated in previous studies for the evaluation of general health status. This test is performed with the Jamar hand dynamometer which displays hand strength in kilograms. By comparing data after re-irradiation to the data collected before the treatment the amount of muscle strength loss can be determined.

Another method of measuring physical performance is by analyzing fatigue. This is a very common symptom in cancer patients and negatively influences their quality of life. Fatigue in patients with cancer can be determined with the use of both the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the more specific Fatigue Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-FA13).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Histologically proven high-grade glioma anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma
* Age ≥ 18 years
* WHO performance status ≤ 2
* Scheduled for re-irradiation of a high grade glioma
* The patient is willing and capable to comply with study procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

• Life expectancy \< 3 months

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline in the palliative effect of re-irradiation in patients with a high grade glioma, defined by quality-of-life parameters
timeFrame: baseline, 6-8weeks, 12 weeks, 18-20 weeks, 30-32 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Overall survival of patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma after re-irradiation
timeFrame: 6 months after the last patient is included
measure: Progression free survival of patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma after re-irradiation
timeFrame: 6 months after the last patient is included
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Maastricht
country: Netherlands
facility: Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Study officials:
affiliation: Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
name: Brigitta Baumert, MD, MBA
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
citation: Nieder C, Adam M, Molls M, Grosu AL. Therapeutic options for recurrent high-grade glioma in adult patients: recent advances. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006 Dec;60(3):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
citation: Veninga T, Langendijk HA, Slotman BJ, Rutten EH, van der Kogel AJ, Prick MJ, Keyser A, van der Maazen RW. Reirradiation of primary brain tumours: survival, clinical response and prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol. 2001 May;59(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00299-7.
citation: Hudes RS, Corn BW, Werner-Wasik M, Andrews D, Rosenstock J, Thoron L, Downes B, Curran WJ Jr. A phase I dose escalation study of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as salvage therapy for persistent or recurrent malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jan 15;43(2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00416-7.
citation: Cho KH, Hall WA, Gerbi BJ, Higgins PD, McGuire WA, Clark HB. Single dose versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Dec 1;45(5):1133-41. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00336-3.
citation: Ernst-Stecken A, Ganslandt O, Lambrecht U, Sauer R, Grabenbauer G. Survival and quality of life after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurooncol. 2007 Feb;81(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9231-0. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
citation: Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139.
citation: Maringwa J, Quinten C, King M, Ringash J, Osoba D, Coens C, Martinelli F, Reeve BB, Gotay C, Greimel E, Flechtner H, Cleeland CS, Schmucker-Von Koch J, Weis J, Van Den Bent MJ, Stupp R, Taphoorn MJ, Bottomley A; EORTC PROBE Project and Brain Cancer Group. Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2107-2112. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq726. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
citation: King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229.
citation: Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
citation: Meyers CA, Wefel JS. The use of the mini-mental state examination to assess cognitive functioning in cancer trials: no ifs, ands, buts, or sensitivity. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 1;21(19):3557-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.080. Epub 2003 Aug 11. No abstract available.
citation: Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
citation: Meyers CA, Smith JA, Bezjak A, Mehta MP, Liebmann J, Illidge T, Kunkler I, Caudrelier JM, Eisenberg PD, Meerwaldt J, Siemers R, Carrie C, Gaspar LE, Curran W, Phan SC, Miller RA, Renschler MF. Neurocognitive function and progression in patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation and motexafin gadolinium: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):157-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.128.
citation: Olson RA, Iverson GL, Carolan H, Parkinson M, Brooks BL, McKenzie M. Prospective comparison of two cognitive screening tests: diagnostic accuracy and correlation with community integration and quality of life. J Neurooncol. 2011 Nov;105(2):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0595-4. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
citation: Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Porock DC, McDaniel R, Nielsen PJ. A meta-analysis of exercise interventions among people treated for cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jul;14(7):699-712. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0905-5. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
citation: Cramp F, Daniel J. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD006145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006145.pub2.
citation: Oldervoll LM, Loge JH, Lydersen S, Paltiel H, Asp MB, Nygaard UV, Oredalen E, Frantzen TL, Lesteberg I, Amundsen L, Hjermstad MJ, Haugen DF, Paulsen O, Kaasa S. Physical exercise for cancer patients with advanced disease: a randomized controlled trial. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1649-57. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0133. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
citation: Nordenskiold UM, Grimby G. Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit instrument. Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22(1):14-9. doi: 10.3109/03009749309095105.
citation: Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 May 23.
citation: Weis J, Arraras JI, Conroy T, Efficace F, Fleissner C, Gorog A, Hammerlid E, Holzner B, Jones L, Lanceley A, Singer S, Wirtz M, Flechtner H, Bottomley A. Development of an EORTC quality of life phase III module measuring cancer-related fatigue (EORTC QLQ-FA13). Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):1002-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3092. Epub 2012 May 4.
citation: Toseland RW, Blanchard CG, McCallion P. A problem solving intervention for caregivers of cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(4):517-28. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0093-8.
citation: Sales E. Psychosocial impact of the phase of cancer on the familiy: an updated review. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1991:1-9.
citation: McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.