Clinical trial NCT05948709: Incentives for Physical Activity for Older Adults
Official title: Incentives for Physical Activity - an RCT with Older Adults
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Physical Activity
Lead sponsor: University of California, San Diego
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute on Aging (NIA)
name: University of Southern California
First posted: 2023-07-17
Enrollment: 70
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 55
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The investigators will recruit 200 older adults and randomize half of them to receive additional incentives. The other half will not receive additional incentives. The investigators will track step count of these two groups for 6 weeks using Fitbits and Fitabase software.
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality, leading to chronic diseases. Much of the world's population is inactive, and older adults are at highest risk. Incentive-based interventions show promise for improving activity levels. The investigators propose to conduct a study to evaluate the impact of incentives on physical activity of older adults (55 and above). Half the participants will receive additional incentives for walking throughout the study. Their step count and physical/mental health will be compared to a control group. The investigators will track the physical activity of participants using Fitbits and will encourage physical activity through making meal donations on behalf of participants (prosocial incentives) and giving them gift cards that can be redeemed at local businesses (personal incentives). Physical and mental health before and after the study will also be assessed using a written survey.

Detailed description: Inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality, leading to chronic diseases (e.g., heart disease, diabetes) and contributing to the obesity epidemic. Much of the world's population is inactive and older adults are at highest risk. Inactivity in older adults is linked to age-related diseases and cognitive decline. Inactivity also imposes social costs through increased medical expenses, which are already high among the growing older adult population in the US.

Incentive-based interventions have gained popularity among behavioral scientists and policymakers as a tool for improving health-related behaviors. But there are drawbacks - first, monetary incentives are often not cost-effective, and therefore scalability is limited. Second, behaviors often return to baseline when monetary incentives are removed, i.e., healthy habits are hard to maintain when incentives are limited in duration. Third, there is a concern that monetary incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation to engage in health-promoting behaviors.

In light of the limited success of incentive-based behavior change programs, the investigators propose to design and evaluate alternative incentives that address these challenges of scalability, habit formation and crowd-out. The investigators will aim to encourage physical activity through alternative incentives - by making a meal donations on behalf of participants (prosocial incentives) and give participants monetary incentives (personal incentives). Both types of incentives have underpinnings in behavioral economics.

Meal donations harness prosocial preferences, which may be more powerful and less likely to reduce intrinsic motivation than equivalent monetary incentives.

The overall aim is to evaluate the impact of alternative incentives on step count of older adults in the short-term and long-term. Exploratory analysis will also evaluate the impact on physical and mental health. The investigators will recruit 200 older adults and randomize half of them to receive additional prosocial and personal incentives for their walking behavior. The other half will not receive these incentives. The investigators will track step count of these two groups for 8 weeks using a Fitbit device. Under the treatment functionality, participants accrue a meal donation and a point for Feeding America for each day that they meet the step goal.

The investigators plan to recruit older adults ages 55 and above at grocery stores and other locations around San Diego, CA. Recruitment will be on a rolling basis. PI Samek has recruited participants at grocery stores in prior studies, hence the investigators believe this is feasible. Participation will be limited to individuals who own a smart phone (61% of older adults in the US own a smart phone, and the investigators expect this number to grow as the population ages). Studies have shown that older adults are open to using app-based technologies, for example older adults are accepting of mindfulness apps.

The research team will be given access to participants' Fitbit data through Fitabase, a research platform that collects data from internet connected consumer activity devices. The investigators identified 7,500 steps as an appropriate goal as studies show older adults walk 4,000 steps on average. For the treatment group, meals will be donated by the research team to Feeding America for each day they meet the step goal of 7,500 steps. They will also receive money for each day they meet the step goal of 7,500 steps a day, for up to 5 days a week. The control group will not receive these incentives for their walking behavior, but their daily step count data will be collected.

Participants will receive a Fitbit upon enrollment. The investigators will collect their physical activity data for 1 week, as their baseline physical activity. After 1 week, individuals who on average less than 6000 per day, will be randomized to the treatment group, which receives the incentives for 4 weeks, or to a control group which does not.

The investigators will also collect follow up data for 1 weeks.

Individuals who on average walk more than 6000 steps per day during the 1 week baseline period will be dropped from the study.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria

* 55 years old or older
* own a smartphone
* can walk independently
* how often they walked outside their home or yard for fun or exercise in the past week - Never, Seldom (1-2 days), Sometimes (3-4 days), or Often (5-7 days)? They can participate if they respond never or seldom.

Exclusion Criteria

* below 55 years
* do not own a smartphone
* unable to walk independently
* how often they walked outside their home or yard for fun or exercise in the past week
* Never, Seldom (1-2 days), Sometimes (3-4 days), or Often (5-7 days)? They can not participate if they respond sometimes or often.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in step count
timeFrame: Week 1 and week 6.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) Score
timeFrame: Week 1 and week 6.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: San Diego
country: United States
facility: Northgate Market Barrio Logan
state: California
city: San Diego
country: United States
facility: Northgate Market National City
state: California
Study officials:
References:
citation: Watson KB, Carlson SA, Gunn JP, Galuska DA, O'Connor A, Greenlund KJ, Fulton JE. Physical Inactivity Among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Sep 16;65(36):954-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6536a3.
citation: Thaler, R., Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 1985. 4(3): p. 199-214.
citation: Cunningham C, O' Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 May;30(5):816-827. doi: 10.1111/sms.13616. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
citation: de Rezende LF, Rey-Lopez JP, Matsudo VK, do Carmo Luiz O. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 9;14:333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-333.
citation: Bherer L, Erickson KI, Liu-Ambrose T. A review of the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive and brain functions in older adults. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:657508. doi: 10.1155/2013/657508. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
citation: Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Pratt M, Yang Z, Adams EK. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;57(4):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
citation: Schneider EL, Guralnik JM. The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. JAMA. 1990 May 2;263(17):2335-40.
citation: Charness, G. and U. Gneezy, Incentives to exercise. Econometrica, 2009. 77(3): p. 909-931.
citation: Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.804.
citation: Tambor M, Pavlova M, Golinowska S, Arsenijevic J, Groot W. Financial incentives for a healthy life style and disease prevention among older people: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):426. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1517-0.
citation: Mantzari E, Vogt F, Shemilt I, Wei Y, Higgins JP, Marteau TM. Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2015 Jun;75:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
citation: Gneezy, U., S. Meier, and P. Rey-Biel, When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2011. 25(4): p. 191-209.
citation: Deci, E.L., Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 1971. 18(1): p. 105.
citation: Marcel Bilger, E.F., Uri Gneezy, Ho Teck Hua, Increasing the Effectiveness of Incentives by Changing Their Meaning: A Mental Accounting Mechanism for Behavior Change. Work in progress., 2017.
citation: Bassett DR Jr, Wyatt HR, Thompson H, Peters JC, Hill JO. Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in U.S. adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Oct;42(10):1819-25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181dc2e54.
citation: Fonda, S. and A.R. Herzog, Documentation of physical functioning measured in the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old Study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Center, 2004.
citation: Steffick, D.E., Documentation of affective functioning measures in the Health and Retirement Study. Ann Arbor, MI: HRS Health Working Group, 2000.
citation: Sadoff S, Samek A, & C Sprenger. Dynamic Inconsistency in Food Choice: Experimental Evidence from Two Food Deserts. The Review of Economic Studies, 2020. 87(4): p. 1954-1988.
citation: Pew Research Center: Internet, Science, & Tech. Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States. 2021, Pew Research Center.
citation: Mahlo L, Windsor TD. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of an App-Based Mindfulness-Meditation Program Among Older Adults. Gerontologist. 2021 Jul 13;61(5):775-786. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa093.