Clinical trial NCT06873685: Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Motor Performance, Robotic Rehabilitation, Nutrition, and Quality of Life
Official title: Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Instrumented Evaluation of Motor Performance and Impact of Robotic Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Quality of Life Assessment (START-RUN1)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Sarcoma, Soft Tissue
Keywords: rehabilitation
nutrition
quality of life
instrumented assessment of motor performance
Lead sponsor: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
name: Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale
First posted: 2025-03-13
Enrollment: 120
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare and heterogeneous tumors. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and microscopic negative margins need to be achieved to improve disease local control. We designed this prospective study to evaluate the main features of motor impairment and the impact of tailored robotic rehabilitation techniques in patients treated for localized soft tissue sarcoma (surgery alone, or surgery + radiation or radiochemotherapy). Specific patients' motor strategies will be quantitatively measured through a biomechanical assessment, including the analysis of joint kinematics, and muscle activity timing patterns. Considering the influence of motor impairment after demolitive surgery, a major interest of this study will be focused on nutrition and Quality of life which will be prospectively evaluated by specific questionnaires at different time points.

Detailed description: This is a non-profit, multicenter, non-controlled interventional study aimed at evaluating the main characteristics of motor disability and the impact of personalized robotic rehabilitation in patients undergoing surgical treatment for localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Aim 1: Identify the clinical characteristics and motor deficits following surgical intervention for soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of a personalized robotic rehabilitation treatment on motor recovery in patients with STS.

Aim 3: Assess the impact of perioperative treatments and surgery on quality of life and nutritional status in patients with STS.

The primary endpoint of the study is the assessment of functional deficits and motor quality in patients with STS who have undergone surgical treatment, both after surgery and after a personalized rehabilitation program. The evaluation of functional deficits will include the analysis of functional impairment, activity limitations, and pain, which will be assessed using validated clinical scales. Motor quality will be measured using MIMU and EMG sensors and motor tests to study muscle activity.

The secondary endpoints will include:

1. a comprehensive patient and disease assessment, recording: demographic information and patient characteristics; past medical history; tumor location; histopathological tumor characteristics; details on neoadjuvant therapies and surgical procedures.
2. the Quality of life assessment of the patients;
3. the nutritional status assessment of the patients.

Study Procedures and Interventions:

Comprehensive assessments-including general, clinical, instrumental, quality of life, and nutritional evaluations-will be conducted at:

T0 (at diagnosis) to establish aims to characterize the impact of the tumor on the patient's functional abilities.

T0+ (after radio-chemotherapy, if applicable) to assess the potential effects of radio-chemotherapy before surgery.

Patients eligible for rehabilitation treatment will follow a structured evaluation process:

T1 (within one month after surgery): reassessment to determine the functional impact of surgery.

Rehabilitation phase: Patients will undergo conventional and robotic rehabilitation therapies tailored to the upper or lower limbs.

T2 (after two months of rehabilitation): reassessment to measure functional recovery and rehabilitation outcomes.

T3 (within eight-months from surgery): follow-up.

The sample size was calculated based on a change after the rehabilitation program at least equal to the MCID of the scale. Specifically, 67 individuals are necessary considering a 2-sided, paired t-test, an MCID of 7 points, a common standard deviation of 20 points, a correlation coefficient between paired samples of 0.5, a significance threshold of 0.05, and a power of 0.80. This sample size will be increased to 90 individuals to account for a 25% loss at T2 owing to patients who will be unable to begin the rehabilitation intervention or who will develop clinical complications during the rehabilitation intervention. The power calculation was limited to patients with RPS and lower limb ESTS since the MCID of the TESS for the upper limb module has not been published. Moreover, we will enroll 30 patients with upper limb ESTS, based on number of patients referred and operated at our units (UO1 and UO3) in the last 2 years. Findings achieved in these patients will be considered exploratory for the scanty information currently available in the literature.

All participating centers will follow a standardized operating procedure regarding treatment and outcome assessment to ensure consistency across all sites. Data will be systematically collected using the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) platform.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. patient with primary and localized STS who is a candidate for limb-sparing surgery or retroperitoneal multivisceral resection (including partial or complete resection of the iliopsoas muscle with functional loss and potential femoral nerve involvement) with curative intent;
2. age 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. recurrent tumors;
2. metastatic disease;
3. candidate for palliative and non-radical surgery;
4. refusal to sign informed consent;
5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women at the time of screening.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in patients' physical function after the rehabilitation treatment as assessed by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) score
timeFrame: T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Brief Pain Questionnaire (BPI)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Scale (LANSS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Kinematic assessment of motor performance
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Surface electromyography (sEMG) assessment
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery);T1 (1 months after surgery);T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery).
measure: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) - Physical Composite Score (PCS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery), T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery), T1 (1 months after surgery) and T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment), T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) - Mental Composite Score (MCS)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery), T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery), T1 (1 months after surgery) and T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment), T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: PREDIMED questionnaire
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery)
measure: Food diary compilation
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Weight in kilograms
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery), T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery), T1 (1 months after surgery) and T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment), T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Height in meters
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Body mass Index in kg/(m^2)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Arm circumferences expressed in cm
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Waist circumferences expressed in cm
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Hips circumferences expressed in cm
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) measurements
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of blood levels of haemoglobin in g/dL
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of blood levels of lymphocite expressed in count of cells or percentage
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of albumine serum levels in g/dL
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of total cholesterol serum levels in mg/dL
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of serum C-reactive protein (CRP)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Concentration of glucose serum levels in mg/dL
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
measure: Nutritional Risk Index score (NRI)
timeFrame: T0 (1 week before surgery); T0+ (after after radiochemotherapy, if administered before surgery); T1 (1 months after surgery); T2 (after 2 months of rehabilitation treatment); T3 (follow up, within 8 months after surgery)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Rome
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
state: Lazio
city: Roma
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
state: RM
city: Napoli
country: Italy
facility: Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G.Pascale
Study officials:
affiliation: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
name: Bruno Vincenzi, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Tanaka A, Okamoto M, Kito M, Yoshimura Y, Aoki K, Suzuki S, Takazawa A, Komatsu Y, Ideta H, Ishida T, Takahashi J. Muscle strength and functional recovery for soft-tissue sarcoma of the thigh: a prospective study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;28(7):922-927. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02348-4. Epub 2023 May 3.
citation: Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
citation: van Eck I, den Hollander D, Desar IME, Soomers VLMN, van de Sande MAJ, de Haan JJ, Verhoef C, Vriens IJH, Bonenkamp JJ, van der Graaf WTA, van Houdt WJ, Husson O. Unraveling the Heterogeneity of Sarcoma Survivors' Health-Related Quality of Life Regarding Primary Sarcoma Location: Results from the SURVSARC Study. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 22;12(11):3083. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113083.
citation: Slump J, Bastiaannet E, Halka A, Hoekstra HJ, Ferguson PC, Wunder JS, Hofer SOP, O'Neill AC. Risk factors for postoperative wound complications after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Sep;72(9):1449-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 May 23.
citation: Rossi L, Boffano M, Comandone A, Ferro A, Grignani G, Linari A, Pellegrino P, Piana R, Ratto N, Davis AM. Validation process of Toronto Exremity Salvage Score in Italian: A quality of life measure for patients with extremity bone and soft tissue tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(4):630-637. doi: 10.1002/jso.25849. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
citation: Poquet N, Lin C. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):52. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 21. No abstract available.
citation: Pavlidis ET, Pavlidis TE. New trends in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma: The role of preoperative biopsy. World J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 24;14(2):89-98. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i2.89.
citation: Ogura K, Uehara K, Akiyama T, Shinoda Y, Iwata S, Tsukushi S, Kobayashi E, Hirose T, Yonemoto T, Endo M, Tanzawa Y, Nakatani F, Kawano H, Tanaka S, Kawai A. Minimal clinically important differences in Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for patients with lower extremity sarcoma. J Orthop Sci. 2020 Mar;25(2):315-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
citation: McKenzie C, Barker K. Occupational therapy rehabilitation for sarcoma patients following limb salvage surgery: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jan;43(2):284-296. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1620874. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
citation: Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Garcia-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvado J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D, Covas MI, Schroder H, Aros F, Gomez-Gracia E, Fiol M, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Lapetra J, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Serra-Majem L, Pinto X, Munoz MA, Warnberg J, Ros E, Estruch R; PREDIMED Study Investigators. A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043134. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
citation: Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May 3;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. eCollection 2016.
citation: Fayers P, Bottomley A; EORTC Quality of Life Group; Quality of Life Unit. Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002 Mar;38 Suppl 4:S125-33. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00448-8.
citation: Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):241-6.
citation: Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, Bombardier C, Griffin A, Bell RS. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 1996 Oct;5(5):508-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00540024.
citation: Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046. No abstract available.
citation: Cocks K, Wells JR, Johnson C, Schmidt H, Koller M, Oerlemans S, Velikova G, Pinto M, Tomaszewski KA, Aaronson NK, Exall E, Finbow C, Fitzsimmons D, Grant L, Groenvold M, Tolley C, Wheelwright S, Bottomley A; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group. Content validity of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 for use in cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jan;178:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.026. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
citation: Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
citation: Caraceni A, Mendoza TR, Mencaglia E, Baratella C, Edwards K, Forjaz MJ, Martini C, Serlin RC, de Conno F, Cleeland CS. A validation study of an Italian version of the Brief Pain Inventory (Breve Questionario per la Valutazione del Dolore). Pain. 1996 Apr;65(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00156-5.
citation: Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
citation: Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00482-6.
citation: Barnes ME, Elliott JA, McIntyre TV, Boyle EA, Gillis AE, Ridgway PF. Sarcopenia and obesity among patients with soft tissue sarcoma - Association with clinicopathologic characteristics, complications and oncologic outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2237-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 20.
citation: Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1025-36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00094-8.