Clinical trial NCT02466893: COMPASS Trial: a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique
Official title: COMPASS Trial: a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accident
Lead sponsor: Medical University of South Carolina
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
First posted: 2015-06-09
Enrollment: 250
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration has been shown to be safe and effective for treatment of AIS within 3 hours of symptom onset, and newer evidence has shown potential benefit out to 4.5 hours. Mechanical thrombectomy for AIS patients has been shown in clinical trials to be safe up to 8 hours after symptom onset. Recent trials utilizing advanced imaging to identify patients with large vessel occlusions amenable to intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) have shown superiority endovascular therapy over medical therapy to result in improved patient functional outcomes. Pilot data utilizing the ADAPT approach has shown superior technical results with similar functional outcomes while lowering procedure time and device costs versus traditional stent retriever as a first line therapy approaches

Detailed description: This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing mechanical thrombectomy with the ADAPT approach to stent retrievers in patients presenting with AIS within 6 hours of symptom onset. Any cleared mechanical stent retriever (SR) or aspiration catheter device that is in common use in the operator's region of practice is approved for use. Prior to releasing any sites to enroll patients, we will collect the following information on the most recent 20 acute ischemic stroke cases, at least five of which must have used direct aspiration as a first approach, and at least five of which must have used stent retrievers as a first approach. It is permissible to go back in time farther than the most recent 20 cases to fulfill either or both of these requirements. There is no requirement for the remaining 10 cases. The datapoints to be collected include:

* Age
* Gender
* LVO location
* Side of LVO
* NIHSS at presentation
* Time of onset
* Time of hospital arrival
* Time imaging completed
* Time of groin puncture
* Time of revascularization, if applicable
* Time procedure terminated, if revascularization was not obtained
* tPA given pre-procedure
* Time of IV-tPA
* Imaging type
* Perfusion imaging
* Devices used
* Passes attempted
* Device success
* Standard and modified final TICI scores
* Outcome measurements: incidence of post-op ICH, discharge and 90 day NIHSS, discharge and 90 day mRS, any and all complications Patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, consent to participate, and who are randomized will be considered enrolled. Treatment arm will be randomly assigned by a central web-based system in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either ADAPT or SR thrombectomy. Data on each patient will be collected at the time of enrollment and treatment, and at subsequent follow-up visits.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 and older (i.e., candidates must have had their 18th birthday)
2. NIHSS ≥8 at the time of neuroimaging
3. Presenting or persistent symptoms within 6 hours of when groin puncture can be obtained
4. Neuroimaging demonstrates large vessel proximal occlusion (distal ICA through MCA bifurcation)
5. The operator feels that the stroke can be appropriately treated with traditional endovascular approaches (the ADAPT approach or conventional first-line stent retriever approach)
6. Pre-event Modified Rankin Scale score 0-1
7. Non-contrast CT/CTA for trial eligibility performed or repeated at treating ADAPT stroke center.
8. Consenting requirements met according to local IRB

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient is more than 6-hours from symptom onset
2. Rapidly improving neurologic examination
3. Absence of large vessel occlusion on non-invasive imaging
4. Presence of an existing or pre-existing large territory infarction
5. Known or suspected pre-existing (chronic) large vessel occlusion in the symptomatic territory
6. Absent femoral pulses
7. Excessive vascular access tortuosity that will likely result in unstable access platform.
8. Pregnancy; if a woman is of child-bearing potential a urine or serum beta HCG test is positive.
9. Severe contrast allergy or absolute contraindication to iodinated contrast.
10. Clinical history, past imaging or clinical judgment suggests that the intracranial occlusion is chronic.
11. Patient has a severe or fatal comorbidities that will likely prevent improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient.

Head CT or MRI Scan Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of blood on imaging (subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etc.)
* High density lesion consistent with hemorrhage of any degree
* Significant mass effect with midline shift
* Core infarct lesion volume \>50 cc.
* Large (more than 1/3 of the middle cerebral artery) regions of clear hypodensity on the baseline CT scan or ASPECTS of \< 7; Sulcal effacement and/or loss of grey-white differentiation alone are not contraindications for treatment.

Primary outcomes:
measure: 90-day global disability assess via the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS)
timeFrame: 2 years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Cost effectiveness of ADAPT approach
timeFrame: 2 years
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Charleston
country: United States
facility: Medical University of South Carolina
state: South Carolina
Study officials:
affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina
name: Aquilla Turk, DO
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Turk AS 3rd, Siddiqui A, Fifi JT, De Leacy RA, Fiorella DJ, Gu E, Levy EI, Snyder KV, Hanel RA, Aghaebrahim A, Woodward BK, Hixson HR, Chaudry MI, Spiotta AM, Rai AT, Frei D, Almandoz JED, Kelly M, Arthur A, Baxter B, English J, Linfante I, Fargen KM, Mocco J. Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.
citation: Turk AS, Siddiqui AH, Mocco J. A comparison of direct aspiration versus stent retriever as a first approach ('COMPASS'): protocol. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Oct;10(10):953-957. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013722. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
citation: Blanc R, Redjem H, Ciccio G, Smajda S, Desilles JP, Orng E, Taylor G, Drumez E, Fahed R, Labreuche J, Mazighi M, Lapergue B, Piotin M. Predictors of the Aspiration Component Success of a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) for the Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Reperfusion Strategy in Anterior Circulation Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1588-1593. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016149. Epub 2017 Apr 20.