Clinical trial NCT03476109: Study of Magnitude and Prediction of Response to Omalizumab and Mepolizumab in Adult Severe Asthma.
Official title: Predictive Factors and Magnitude of Response to Omalizumab and Mepolizumab in Allergic and Eosinophilic Severe Asthma: a Pragmatic Multicenter Trial in Belgium.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Severe Asthma
Lead sponsor: Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: University Hospital, Ghent
name: University of Liege
name: CHU de Charleroi
name: Erasme University Hospital
name: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCLouvain Namur
name: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
name: Brugmann University Hospital
name: Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
name: AZ Delta
name: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
name: KU Leuven
First posted: 2018-03-23
Enrollment: 100
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Intervention model description: Severe asthma patients who are eligible to both anti-IgE (omalizumab) and anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapies, will be randomized to decide the first treatment to start. Patients will then be prolonged or switched to the other according to the clinical response. There will be 5 possibilities: oma(lizumab) group, mepo(lizumab) group, oma-mepo switch, mepo-oma switch, and oma/mepo failure.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Pragmatic trial to define the magnitude and the predictive factors of the response to omalizumab and mepolizumab in adult patients with severe refractory asthma and eligible to both therapies.

Detailed description: Title "PREDICTUMAB: Predictive factors and magnitude of response to omalizumab and mepolizumab in allergic and eosinophilic severe asthma: a multicenter, open, active-controlled, randomized trial in adult patients in Belgium".

Rationale and background New treatments are now available to treat severe refractory asthma, which affects about 3 to 5% of asthma patients. In particular, biological therapies using monoclonal antibodies targeted to immunoglobulin E (IgE) or interleukin (IL)-5 (and in the future other cytokines or growth factors) benefit to certain patients. Identifying those patients who will better benefit from a specific treatment requires the validation of features (clinical traits, biomarkers) that are predictive of the therapeutic outcome. Such predictive strategy is not available to decide whether anti-IgE (omalizumab) or anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) should be prioritized in patients who are eligible to both therapies. In addition, the comparison of the magnitude of the clinical benefits achieved by these therapies remains unexplored in this population.

Study Design

The study is designed to initially randomly allocate patients from two strata (with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids) to oma- vs mepolizumab. According to the evaluation of response (at 4 or 6 months, respectively), subjects will then be either prolonged (for 12 months, for both therapies) on the same therapy, or switched to the other. For those who were switched, treatment will be prolonged (or not, in dual failers) after 4 or 6 months according to their evaluation of response. Time-points for analysis will be at 4 or 6 months, 10 months (interim analysis) and 18 or 22 months (final, posttreatment analysis).

State-of-the-art

Asthma is one of the most frequent chronic diseases, affecting 5 to 10% of the population worldwide. Omalizumab and mepolizumab represent the approved antibodies that are indicated in allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes of severe asthma respectively. However, if some patients fall into only one phenotypic category based on these criteria, a substantial number of patients are potentially eligible to both therapies. In those patients, no information is available to orientate towards a preferable therapy as the predictive weight of additional phenotypic traits, such as associated nasal polyps or early- versus late onset of disease, remains unknown. In addition, no head-to-head comparison of these therapies is available in this population.

Objectives of the study

Primary objectives To determine clinical features and blood (or sputum) biomarkers able to predict a better response to omalizumab or mepolizumab in severe asthma patients eligible to both therapies.

To determine the magnitude of response, in terms of improvement in symptoms, exacerbation rate and/or lung function, in responders to omalizumab vs mepolizumab.

Secondary objectives To compare the global baseline characteristics (clinical and biological features) of patients responding to omalizumab vs mepolizumab.

Management and reporting of adverse events.

If during the study, an adverse event (AE) (serious or non-serious) is identified as attributed to omalizumab or mepolizumab, this will be documented as appropriate in routine good clinical practice, to the Federal Agency of Medicines and Products of Health (AFMPS) as well as to the Central Ethic Committee.

Confidentiality of data.

The identity and participation of subjects will remain strictly confidential, according to Belgian laws dated 8 Dec 1992 related to the protection of private life and dated 22 Aug 2002 related to patient rights.

Specimens and associated data will be labeled with unique patient identification number.

Data will be anonymized in all files, results and publications related to the study.

The promoter confirms to authorize the regulatory surveillance, examination and controls by competent authorities, by allowing direct access to database/files, and this in full respect of confidentiality.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria: • Signed informed consent form (ICF),

* Age \>18+ years at time of signing ICF,
* Able to comply with the study protocol, in the investigator's judgment,
* Documented physician-diagnosed asthma ,
* Patients with severe disease and eligible to omalizumab and mepolizumab, and who have not yet received any of these therapies.

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of evidence of drug/substance abuse that would pose a risk to patient safety, interfere with the conduct of study, have an impact on the study results, or affect the patient's ability to participate in the study, in the opinion of the investigator
* Treatment with any investigational therapy within 6 months or 5 drug half-lives prior to enrolment.
* Known sensitivity to any of the active substances or their excipients to be administered during the study.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Efficacy on asthma symptoms
timeFrame: Up to 22 months
measure: Efficacy on lung function
timeFrame: Up to 22 months
measure: Efficacy on severe exacerbations
timeFrame: Up to 22 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Predictive factors of therapeutic response
timeFrame: Baseline features (and according to response at 22 months)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Brussel
country: Belgium
facility: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
state: Brussels
city: Charleroi
country: Belgium
facility: CHU de Charleroi
state: Hainaut
city: Charleroi
country: Belgium
facility: Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
state: Hainaut
city: Leuven
country: Belgium
facility: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
state: Vlaams Brabant
city: Roeselare
country: Belgium
facility: AZ Delta Roeselare
state: West-vlaanderen
city: Brussels
country: Belgium
facility: Cliniques universitaires St-Luc
city: Bruxelles
country: Belgium
facility: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
city: Bruxelles
country: Belgium
facility: Brugmann University Hospital
city: Bruxelles
country: Belgium
facility: Erasme University Hospital
city: Gent
country: Belgium
facility: University Hospital, Ghent
city: Liège
country: Belgium
facility: University Hospital of Liege
city: Namur
country: Belgium
facility: CHR Namur
city: Namur
country: Belgium
facility: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dinant Godinne - UCL Namur
Study officials:
affiliation: Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
name: Charles Pilette
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: