Clinical trial NCT03696160: The Late Presenter Treatment Optimisation Study
Official title: An Open-Label, Multi-Centre, Randomised Study to Investigate Integrase Inhibitor Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor Antiretroviral Therapy for Patients With Advanced HIV Disease
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: HIV/AIDS
Lead sponsor: NEAT ID Foundation
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Gilead Sciences
name: Janssen Pharmaceuticals
First posted: 2018-10-04
Enrollment: 447
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The main purpose of this study is to compare two different types of HIV treatments, in terms of effectiveness and improvement of side effects, for patients who are diagnosed with a more advanced HIV infection. Patients with advanced HIV infections are otherwise known as 'late presenters'.

There are many effective treatments for HIV available; however, for late presenting patients the investigators do not know which type of treatment performs best. This is the first large study to compare treatments for patients in this situation, and the investigators hope that the results of this study will help doctors decide which treatments to use in the future.

The two different types of treatment the investigators are comparing both contain a mixture of drugs that work together to combat HIV:

The Boosted Protease Inhibitor combination (PI) which is a combination tablet containing: darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. It was approved for use in Europe under the brand name Symtuza®.

The Integrase Inhibitor combination (INI). Which is a combination tablet containing: bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide. This is a a newer combination which was approved for use in Europe in June 2018 under the brand name of Biktarvy®.

The main difference between the two treatments is how each one fights a HIV infection. They both stop a part of the virus from working (i.e. inhibit it), to prevent it from making copies of itself. The PI treatment contains drugs to stop the protease part of the virus, whereas the INI treatment contains drugs to stop the integrase part.

In recent studies, it appears that treatments containing integrase inhibitors may be better for late presenting patients. They have been shown to quickly bring down the amount of virus in the body, and the side effects may be more acceptable to late presenters.

To compare the two treatments, half of the participants on this study will be given the PI treatment, and the other half will be given the INI treatment.

Detailed description: The effectiveness of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) has consistently improved over the years. This is largely due to newer drugs having improved antiviral effectiveness and more tolerable side effect profiles; resulting in better viral suppression and improved treatment adherence. On the other hand, most recent clinical trials look at the effectiveness of ART in patients with less advanced disease. These patients usually suffer from less related diseases, drug-drug interactions, and other risks for treatment failure. Outside of these trials, the number of patients who present to clinic with a more developed advanced HIV infection, known as 'late presenters', remains high across Europe. Trials for these patients have tended to focus on the time of starting treatment and the management of infections.

Much less is known about which ART treatments perform best for these late presenting patients; particularly in terms of virus suppression, immune system recovery, side effects and improvement of AIDs related diseases. No specific drug combinations have been compared in appropriate clinical trials before, and the international guidelines for first line treatment judge all therapies as equal standard of care for these patients.

The investigators anticipate that Integrase inhibitor containing regimes may be better suited to patients with advanced disease, due to their beneficial side-effect profile and ability to rapidly decrease viral load levels. Therefore the investigators are conducting this clinical trial to compare an integrase inhibitor regime, against a protease inhibitor regime in patients with advanced HIV infection. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Biktarvy® against Symtuza®.

Patients will be recruited from sites across Europe, and randomized onto either arm of the study. After randomisation onto either treatment regime, patients will attend approximately 9 follow-up visits over the course of a year. During these visits, patients will be asked to complete two questionnaires, to assess their quality of life and HIV symptoms. They will also be asked to provide a number of blood samples. These samples are to ensure that the patient is not resistant to the study drug and that their disease is not worsening. Samples to test for study drug resistance will be shipped to a laboratory for analysis in the even that the patient experiences virological failure.

Biktarvy® will be supplied from Gilead and Symtuza® will be provided by Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. The ability to understand and sign a written informed consent form (ICF) and must be willing to comply with all study requirements.
2. Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating females†.
3. Age ≥ 18 years.
4. Have documented, untreated HIV-1 infection with either:

   1. AIDS with any CD4 cell count (AIDS-defining conditions are listed within Appendix 3).

      Or
   2. Severe bacterial infection (BI)‡ and must have a CD4 cell count \< 200/μl within 28 days prior to study entry§.

      Or
   3. Any symptoms or no symptoms and must have a CD4 cell count \< 100/μL within 28 days prior to study entry and must have an entry HIV viral load \> 1000 copies/mL.

      Or
   4. Currently receiving treatment for OI\*\*. i. Subjects with other serious OIs, including other AIDS-defining and AIDS-related OIs for which appropriate therapy other than ART exists are eligible, but Investigator approval must be obtained. ii. Current OI treatment can have been discontinued prior to start of ART.
5. Have an entry HIV viral load \> 1000 copies/mL
6. Have the ability to take oral medications.
7. Females of childbearing potential and heterosexually active males must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception and be willing to continue practising these birth control methods during the trial and for at least 30 days after the last dose of study medication. See Appendix 7 for further details.

Such methods include:

* True abstinence from penile-vaginal intercourse, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. (Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception).
* Non-hormonal Intrauterine device or non-hormonal intrauterine system that meets the effectiveness criteria as stated in the product label.
* Male partner sterilization prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject.
* Combined (oestrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception associated with the inhibition of ovulation\*:
* Oral
* Intravaginal
* Transdermal
* Bilateral tubal occlusion

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Any therapeutic ARV which commenced less than 2 weeks prior to screening and which was taken for more than 48 hours
2. Systemic cancer chemotherapy within 30 days prior to study entry, or current treatment for cancer (with the exception of Kaposi's sarcoma) or lymphoma.
3. Current or anticipated use of contraindicated medications (see Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for Symtuza® and Biktarvy®) or anticipated systemic chemotherapy during study enrolment (administration of any contraindicated medication must be discontinued at least 30 days prior to the baseline visit and for the duration of the study).
4. Known resistance to the components of study medications (see section 6.1.3 for more details).
5. History or symptoms of advanced renal and/or hepatic impairment. Such as, kidney failure requiring dialysis; eGFR \<30 mL/min; hepatic transaminases (AST and ALT) \> 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN); or, platelet count \<50,000.
6. Current drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would cause interference with the study.
7. Cryptococcal meningitis or active TB, or current or expected treatment requiring Rifampicin or Rifabutin (patients with expected latent TB will have a TB test (IGRAs e.g. ELISPOT, QuantiFERON etc.) at their screening visit).
8. History or presence of allergy to the study drugs or their components, or drugs of their class.
9. Using any concomitant therapy disallowed as per the product labelling for the study drugs.
10. Any investigational drug within 30 days prior to the study drug administration.
11. Patients with severe (Child Pugh class C) hepatic impairment.
12. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time to treatment failure
timeFrame: Earliest at 12 weeks, latest 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA viral load <50 copies/mL
timeFrame: Week 24, 36 and 48
measure: HIV-1 drug resistance confirmed
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
measure: Time to reach CD4 (cluster of differentiation 4) count >200/µL
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
measure: CD4/CD8 (cluster of differentiation 8) ratio
timeFrame: Week 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48
measure: Incidence of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Incidence and duration of hospitalisation or rate of relapse of specific opportunistic or bacterial infection
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Division of AIDS Adverse Event (AE) Grading Table Corrected Version 2.1-July 2017
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic or bacterial infection treatment changes and dose modifications due to toxicities and drug-drug interaction with antiretroviral therapy, and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Health care resource use, including total inpatient days and emergency room visits
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Quality of life questionnaire outcomes
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Discontinuation or modification of study medication due to insufficient virological response or resistance mutation development
timeFrame: Week 48
Other outcomes:
measure: Mutations detected by deep sequencing compared with those detected by population sequencing
timeFrame: Week 48
measure: Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA viral load < 50 copies/mL
timeFrame: Week 4, 8, 12
Locations:
city: Antwerp
country: Belgium
facility: Institute of Tropical Medicine
city: Brussels
country: Belgium
facility: CHU Saint-Pierre
city: Gent
country: Belgium
facility: University Hospital Ghent
city: Marseille
country: France
facility: Hopital Europeen Marseille
city: Melun
country: France
facility: Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France (Melun)
city: Montpellier
country: France
facility: Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
city: Nantes
country: France
facility: CHU de Nantes
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Hopital Lariboisiere
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Hopital Saint-Louis
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Hôpital Saint Antoine
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
city: Bonn
country: Germany
facility: Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Universitätsklinikum Bonn
city: Frankfurt
country: Germany
facility: Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt
city: Hamburg
country: Germany
facility: ICH Study Center Gmbh & Co. KG
city: Hannover
country: Germany
facility: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
city: Munich
country: Germany
facility: Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
city: Munich
country: Germany
facility: University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
city: Dublin
country: Ireland
facility: Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
city: Dublin
country: Ireland
facility: St Vincent's University Hospital
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: ASST Santi Paolo
city: Milan
country: Italy
facility: Luigi Sacco Hospital
city: Milan
country: Italy
facility: Ospedale San Raffaele
city: Modena
country: Italy
facility: Clinica of Infectious Diseases
city: Rome
country: Italy
facility: INMI Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome
city: Alicante
country: Spain
facility: Hospital General Universatario Alicante
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Clinic (Helios Building)
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital del Mar
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitari Vall d'Herbon
city: Elche
country: Spain
facility: Hospital General Universitatrio de Elche
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Ramon y Cajal
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitatrio La Paz
city: Bournemouth
country: United Kingdom
facility: Royal Bournemouth Hospital
city: Bristol
country: United Kingdom
facility: Southmead Hospital
city: Leeds
country: United Kingdom
facility: Leeds Teaching Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Barts Health
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Chelsea and Westminister
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Guy's Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Homerton University Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Imperial College Healthcare Trust
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Kings College London
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Mortimer Market Centre
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Royal Free Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: St George's Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: University Hospital Lewisham
city: Manchester
country: United Kingdom
facility: North Manchester General Hospital
city: Sheffield
country: United Kingdom
facility: Sheffield Teaching Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Hannover Medical School
name: Georg Behrens
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: DeJesus E, Rockstroh JK, Henry K, Molina JM, Gathe J, Ramanathan S, Wei X, Yale K, Szwarcberg J, White K, Cheng AK, Kearney BP; GS-236-0103 Study Team. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012 Jun 30;379(9835):2429-2438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60918-0.
citation: Raffi F, Rachlis A, Stellbrink HJ, Hardy WD, Torti C, Orkin C, Bloch M, Podzamczer D, Pokrovsky V, Pulido F, Almond S, Margolis D, Brennan C, Min S; SPRING-2 Study Group. Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):735-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61853-4. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
citation: Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, Duiculescu D, Eberhard A, Gutierrez F, Hocqueloux L, Maggiolo F, Sandkovsky U, Granier C, Pappa K, Wynne B, Min S, Nichols G; SINGLE Investigators. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 7;369(19):1807-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215541.
citation: Sax et al. Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Bictegravir Coformulated With FTC/TAF in a Fixed-Dose Combination vs Dolutegravir + FTC/TAF in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Positive Adults: Week 48 Results. 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; Paris, France; July 23-26, 2017
citation: Gallant et al. A phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial of bictegravir in a fixed dose combination, B/F/TAF, vs ABC/DTG/3TC in treatment-naïve adults at week 48. 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science; Paris, France; July 23-26, 2017. MOAB0105LB
citation: Camoni L, Raimondo M, Regine V, Salfa MC, Suligoi B; regional representatives of the HIV Surveillance System. Late presenters among persons with a new HIV diagnosis in Italy, 2010-2011. BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 27;13:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-281.
citation: Montlahuc C, Guiguet M, Abgrall S, Daneluzzi V, de Salvador F, Launay O, Martinez V, Partisani M, Pradier C, Rouveix E, Valin N, Grabar S, Costagliola D; French Hospital Database ANRS CO4 cohort. Impact of late presentation on the risk of death among HIV-infected people in France (2003-2009). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):197-203. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31829cfbfa.
citation: Antinori A, Coenen T, Costagiola D, Dedes N, Ellefson M, Gatell J, Girardi E, Johnson M, Kirk O, Lundgren J, Mocroft A, D'Arminio Monforte A, Phillips A, Raben D, Rockstroh JK, Sabin C, Sonnerborg A, De Wolf F; European Late Presenter Consensus Working Group. Late presentation of HIV infection: a consensus definition. HIV Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):61-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00857.x.
citation: Raffetti E, Postorino MC, Castelli F, Casari S, Castelnuovo F, Maggiolo F, Di Filippo E, D'Avino A, Gori A, Ladisa N, Di Pietro M, Sighinolfi L, Zacchi F, Torti C. The risk of late or advanced presentation of HIV infected patients is still high, associated factors evolve but impact on overall mortality is vanishing over calendar years: results from the Italian MASTER Cohort. BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 25;16(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3477-z.
citation: Sobrino-Vegas P, Rodriguez-Urrego J, Berenguer J, Caro-Murillo AM, Blanco JR, Viciana P, Moreno S, Bernardino I, del Amo J; CoRIS. Educational gradient in HIV diagnosis delay, mortality, antiretroviral treatment initiation and response in a country with universal health care. Antivir Ther. 2012;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.3851/IMP1939.
citation: Late presenters working group in COHERE in EuroCoord; Mocroft A, Lundgren J, Antinori A, Monforte Ad, Brannstrom J, Bonnet F, Brockmeyer N, Casabona J, Castagna A, Costagliola D, De Wit S, Fatkenheuer G, Furrer H, Jadand C, Johnson A, Lazanas M, Leport C, Moreno S, Mussini C, Obel N, Post F, Reiss P, Sabin C, Skaletz-Rorowski A, Suarez-Loano I, Torti C, Warszawski J, Wittkop L, Zangerle R, Chene G, Raben D, Kirk O. Late presentation for HIV care across Europe: update from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) study, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(47). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.47.30070.
citation: Abdool Karim SS, Naidoo K, Grobler A, Padayatchi N, Baxter C, Gray AL, Gengiah T, Gengiah S, Naidoo A, Jithoo N, Nair G, El-Sadr WM, Friedland G, Abdool Karim Q. Integration of antiretroviral therapy with tuberculosis treatment. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1492-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014181.
citation: Blanc FX, Sok T, Laureillard D, Borand L, Rekacewicz C, Nerrienet E, Madec Y, Marcy O, Chan S, Prak N, Kim C, Lak KK, Hak C, Dim B, Sin CI, Sun S, Guillard B, Sar B, Vong S, Fernandez M, Fox L, Delfraissy JF, Goldfeld AE; CAMELIA (ANRS 1295-CIPRA KH001) Study Team. Earlier versus later start of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults with tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1471-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1013911.
citation: Zolopa A, Andersen J, Powderly W, Sanchez A, Sanne I, Suckow C, Hogg E, Komarow L. Early antiretroviral therapy reduces AIDS progression/death in individuals with acute opportunistic infections: a multicenter randomized strategy trial. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005575. Epub 2009 May 18.
citation: Mussini C, Manzardo C, Johnson M, Monforte Ad, Uberti-Foppa C, Antinori A, Gill MJ, Sighinolfi L, Borghi V, Lazzarin A, Miro JM, Sabin C; Late Presenter Investigators. Patients presenting with AIDS in the HAART era: a collaborative cohort analysis. AIDS. 2008 Nov 30;22(18):2461-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328314b5f1.
citation: Demarest J, Underwood M, St Clair M, Dorey D, Brown D, Zolopa A. Short Communication: Dolutegravir-Based Regimens Are Active in Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Naive Patients with Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Apr;34(4):343-346. doi: 10.1089/AID.2017.0184. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
citation: Wijting I et al. Integrase Inhibitors are an Independent Risk Factor for IRIS: An ATHENA Cohort Study. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. February 2017. Seattle, WA, USA. Abstract 731.
citation: Dutertre M et al. Initiation of ART Based on Integrase Inhibitors Increases the Risk of IRIS. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. February 2017. Seattle, WA, USA. Abstract 732.
citation: Psichogiou M, Basoulis D, Tsikala-Vafea M, Vlachos S, Kapelios CJ, Daikos GL. Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors and the Emergence of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS). Curr HIV Res. 2017;15(6):405-410. doi: 10.2174/1570162X15666171122155708.
citation: Hill AM, Mitchell N, Hughes S, Pozniak AL. Risks of cardiovascular or central nervous system adverse events and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, for dolutegravir versus other antiretrovirals: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018 Mar;13(2):102-111. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000445.
citation: Paredes R, Tzou PL, van Zyl G, Barrow G, Camacho R, Carmona S, Grant PM, Gupta RK, Hamers RL, Harrigan PR, Jordan MR, Kantor R, Katzenstein DA, Kuritzkes DR, Maldarelli F, Otelea D, Wallis CL, Schapiro JM, Shafer RW. Collaborative update of a rule-based expert system for HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181357. eCollection 2017.
citation: Levy et al. ANRS 146 - GeSIDA 7211 OPTIMAL phase III trial: maraviroc plus cART in advanced HIV-1-infected individuals. Journal Of The International Aids Society (Vol. 20, Pp. 6-7)
citation: Slama L, Landman R, Assoumou L, Benalycherif A, Samri A, Joly V, Pialoux G, Valin N, Cabie A, Duvivier C, Lambert-Niclot S, Marcelin AG, Peytavin G, Costagliola D, Girard PM; IMEA 040 DATA Study Group. Efficacy and safety of once-daily ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir in combination with a dual nucleos(t)ide analogue backbone in HIV-1-infected combined ART (cART)-naive patients with severe immunosuppression: a 48 week, non-comparative, randomized, multicentre trial (IMEA 040 DATA trial). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Aug;71(8):2252-61. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw103. Epub 2016 Apr 10.