Clinical trial NCT03629860: Ascending Ramus Versus Chin Cortical Plates for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla
Official title: Assessment of Mandibular Ascending Ramus Cortical Plates for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Versus Chin Cortical Plates(Randomized Clinical Tial)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Atrophy of Edentulous Maxillary Alveolar Ridge
Keywords: Atrophic, augmetation, bone regeneration
Lead sponsor: Cairo University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2018-08-14
Enrollment: 12
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial)
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial)

Detailed description: Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial) To know what is better and more efficient chin or ascending ramus cortical plates.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with atrophic maxilla with residual bone height from 3 to 4mm.
* Both sexes

Exclusion Criteria:

* Intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
* Systemic condition that contraindicate implant basement.
* Psychiatric problems

Primary outcomes:
measure: width and height of the bone gained by the procedure and the new measures from a physiologic vital structures e.g( nasal floor, maxillary sinus or even occlusal plan)
timeFrame: 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Histomorphometric analysis bone area percent
timeFrame: 6 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cairo
country: Egypt
facility: Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
state: Al-Manial
Study officials:
affiliation: Cairo University
name: Ahmed Y Yousri, Bsd
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Ali SA, Karthigeyan S, Deivanai M, Kumar A. Implant rehabilitation for atrophic maxilla: a review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Sep;14(3):196-207. doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0360-4. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
citation: Sorni M, Guarinos J, Garcia O, Penarrocha M. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005 Apr 1;10 Suppl 1:E45-56. English, Spanish.
citation: Dym H, Huang D, Stern A. Alveolar bone grafting and reconstruction procedures prior to implant placement. Dent Clin North Am. 2012 Jan;56(1):209-18, x. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.09.005.
citation: Bellini CM, Romeo D, Galbusera F, Agliardi E, Pietrabissa R, Zampelis A, Francetti L. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):155-7.
citation: Bidra AS, Almas K. Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):156-64. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60035-9.
citation: Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Sep;32(9):994-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00809.x.
citation: Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H. Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Oct;62(7):1039-58.
citation: Menini M, Signori A, Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Pera F, Ravera G, Pera P. Tilted implants in the immediate loading rehabilitation of the maxilla: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012 Sep;91(9):821-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034512455802. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
citation: Peleg M, Mazor Z, Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):549-56.
citation: Topolovec-Vranic J, Canzian S, Innis J, Pollmann-Mudryj MA, McFarlan AW, Baker AJ. Patient satisfaction and documentation of pain assessments and management after implementing the adult nonverbal pain scale. Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jul;19(4):345-54; quiz 355. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010247.