Clinical trial NCT02839109: PET-CT vs DWI-MRI in Response Evaluation in Esophageal Cancer
Official title: PET-CT and DWI-MRI in Evaluating and Predicting Response to Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Esophageal Tumor
Lead sponsor: University Medical Center Groningen
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-07-20
Enrollment: 26
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: The study group consists of patients with potentially curative (R0) resectable EC (T2-T4aN0M0/T1-T4aN1-3M0). These patients should be eligible for neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) including; performance/WHO ≤ 2; age \> 18 yrs; hematology, electrolytes, liver and renal tests within normal range; no prior radio- or chemotherapy that would influence treatment for EC; no other malignancies (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ), no active infect at the time of imaging, written informed consent.

Brief summary: In patients with esophageal cancer (EC) neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery with curative intent leads to objective responses in 45 to 60%, whereas 20-35% of the patients had no residual tumor (ypT0N0) at pathologic examination. The absolute survival benefit of response to nCRT is 15%, but still 14% of the patients develop locoregional failure in the CROSS trial. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((FDG-PET-CT) is able to distinct responders from non-responders, but still misses significant clinical evidence. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential benefits, which might be enhanced by combining both methods. PET/CT and DWI-MRI more precisely correlate anatomic and metabolic FDG-avid lesions and seem to assess post-treatment changes, especially regarding nodal staging. Both techniques claim an important role in selection of patients with clinical complete response (cCR) and indirectly with pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT. However, the exact role and complementary effects of both techniques is still unknown.

For appropriate judgment of response, secure standard endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) / biopsy of potential suspected lesions, both nodal or residual tumor, seen on PET/CT or DWI/MRI or during EUS will be performed \<2 weeks before surgery, approximately 6-10 weeks after nCRT and compared with the situation at primary staging. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) resembling pathologic response (pCR= ypT0N0) after nCRT may refrain from surgical resection and related morbidity and mortality. However, patients without early (2wk after commencement) response during nCRT course may not benefit from nCRT.

DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.

Detailed description: DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Tumor hypoxia mediates chemoradiation resistance, leading to selection of aggressive tumor cell clones with the capacity to evade tumor microenvironment by increased anaerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Histologically proven esophageal cancer (SCC and AC).
2. Age of 18 years or older.
3. Able to give written informed consent before registration.
4. T2-T4aN0M0 or T1-T4aN1-3M0 esophageal cancer.
5. Potentially curatively (R0) resectable tumor.
6. Tumor have sufficient FDG-baseline uptake.
7. Able to tolerate PET-CT and DWI-MRI as required by protocol.
8. Eligible for neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), including KPScore ≥ 70% / WHO\>2; adequate renal, hepatic, hematological function.
9. No prior chemotherapy or mediastinal radiotherapy allowed.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Non-resectable tumors: clinical or pathologic (T4b/R1-2 resections).
2. Proven distant metastases.
3. Prior malignancy except in-situ cervical lesions or non-melanoma skin cancer in the past 5 years.
4. Poorly controlled diabetes
5. Medical comorbidity preventing from surgery/preop CRT
6. General contraindications to MRI:

   * implanted pacemaker/serious claustrophobia
   * aneurysmal clips/metal implants in field of view

6. Major obesity (BMI \> 40). 7. Active esophagitis. 8. Breast feeding/Pregnancy.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Tumor response
timeFrame: Assessing clinical and pathologic response
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Disease free survival (DFS)
timeFrame: at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Groningen
country: Netherlands
facility: University Medical Center Groningen
Study officials:
affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen
name: John Plukker, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: