Clinical trial NCT05295485: Evaluation of the Course Format "NASIM25"
Official title: Evaluation of the Course Format "NASIM25" - Development of Skills and Professional Safety of Aspiring Prehospital Emergency Physicians by the Course NASIM25
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Emergencies
Trauma Injury
Keywords: emergencies
trauma
pediatric emergencies
prehospital emergencies
Lead sponsor: Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-03-25
Enrollment: 60
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: CROSS_SECTIONAL
Sampling method: PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: physicians that are aspiring the qualification: "prehospital emergency physician"

Brief summary: The investigators intend to evauate the development and professional safety of aspiring prehospital emergency pyhsicians in a cross sectional and longitudinal modality. This compass objecitve and subjective evaluable professional skills essential in prehospital emergency medicine.

Detailed description: In the course format "NASIM25" aspiring prehospital emergency physicians are trained in 25 simulation based scenarios dealing about situations being rare on the scene having have a tremendous impact on the patients if not treated adequately.

To evaluate the impact of the course format on the skills of the participants (i.e. aspiring prehospital emergency physicians) the investigators quantify the trained skills and professional safety in three dimensions of skills and professional safety:

1. The influence on applying the ABCDE-Approach using the a validated score by Peran et al 2020 (ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment -development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1)) and non technical skills using a validated score by Kim et al 2009 (Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M.A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc. 2009;4(1):6-16)
2. The influence on the cource on the self- and external assessement of the participants using school marks
3. The influence on the professional safety using a web based survey in a longitudinal modality throughout the entire qualification curriculum of prehospital emergency medicine.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* physician aspiring the qualification: "prehospital emergency physician" and participating in the course: NASIM25

Exclusion Criteria:

* not participating in the course NASIM25

Primary outcomes:
measure: Influence on applying the ABCDE-Approach and non-technical skills
timeFrame: 3 Days
measure: Influence on self- and external assessement
timeFrame: 3 Days
measure: Influence on the professional safety
timeFrame: 1 Year
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Mainz
country: Germany
facility: University Hospital Centre Mainz
state: RLP
Study officials:
affiliation: Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
name: Ott Thomas, M.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Peran D, Kodet J, Pekara J, Mala L, Truhlar A, Cmorej PC, Lauridsen KG, Sari F, Sykora R. ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study. BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3.
citation: Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc. 2009 Spring;4(1):6-16. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181880472.