Clinical trial NCT06375928: EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Resectable Disease (CARPEDIEM-1 Trial)
Official title: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage With Lumen-Apposing Stent vs Classical ERCP for First-line Therapy of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction in Resectable Disease: An Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (CARPEDIEM-1 Trial)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Pancreatic Cancer Resectable
Biliary Tract Neoplasms
Keywords: Choledochoduodenostomy
Therapeutic endoscopy
Biliary Drainage
Lumen apposing metal stent
ERCP
Biliopancreatic maliognancy
Lead sponsor: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Hospital Mutua de Terrassa
name: Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
name: Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
name: Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
name: Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
name: Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
name: Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
name: University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
name: Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
name: Hospital de Sant Pau
name: University of Salamanca
First posted: 2024-04-19
Enrollment: 44
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate temporal delay (days) between biliary drainage (EUS-CDS vs ERCP as first line therapy) and surgery in patients with resectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Detailed description: Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has been extended as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, there are clinical trials which have compared it with ERCP as a first line treatment for MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate between both techniques. Data about the benefit of this techique in resectable patients is still limited.

A recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) which included resectable patients, found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less delay (days) between biliary drainage and surgery than the ERCP group, with fewer endoscopy and surgery AEs.

Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing delay between biliary drainage when compared to ERCP in MDBO in resectable patients.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Malignant distal biliary obstruction diagnosed in patient considered RESECTABLE with biliary drainage indication: i) impaired hepatic enzymes (including hyperbilirubinemia) x3 times upper the superior normal value. ii) Radiologic singns of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction with presence of retrograde dilatation, of at least 12-mm axial diameter.
* Consensual malignancy by a bilio-pancreatic multidisciplinar committe (histological confirmation is not mandatory)
* Patient capable of understanding and/or singning the informed consent.
* Patient who understands the type of study and will comply with all follow-up tests throughout its duration

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Severe coagulation disorder: INR \> 1.5 non correctable with plasma administration and/or platelet count \< 50.000/mm3.
* Distal malignant biliary strictures in patients considered borderline, non-surgical, unresectable, or palliative
* Benign or uncertain etiology of biliary strictures or strictures located proximally or in close proximity to the hilum.
* Patients with prior biliary stents or other biliary drainages (e.g., PTCD).
* Altered intestinal anatomy due to prior surgery that prevents or hinders papillary access (e.g., gastric bypass, Billroth II, duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y).
* Stenosis in the antral or duodenal region that prevents access to the duodenum and reaching the papilla.
* Situations that do not allow for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (e.g., esophageal stricture).
* Patients with functional diversity, who lack the capacity to understand the nature and potential consequences of the study, except when a legal representative is available.
* Patients incapable of maintaining follow-up appointments (lack of adherence).
* Lack of informed consent.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Delay in days between endoscopic biliary drainage and cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CDP)
timeFrame: 1 day to 12 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Technical success
timeFrame: day 0
measure: Clinical success
timeFrame: 14 days after BD
measure: AE - biliary drainage
timeFrame: 0 to 30 days after BD
measure: AE - surgery
timeFrame: 0 to 90 days after surgery
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
state: Barcelona, Catalonia
Study officials:
affiliation: Bellvitge University Hospital
name: Joan B Gornals, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Teoh AYB, Napoleon B, Kunda R, Arcidiacono PG, Kongkam P, Larghi A, Van der Merwe S, Jacques J, Legros R, Thawee RE, Saxena P, Aerts M, Archibugi L, Chan SM, Fumex F, Kaffes AJ, Ma MTW, Messaoudi N, Rizzatti G, Ng KKC, Ng EKW, Chiu PWY. EUS-Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Using Lumen Apposing Stent Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (DRA-MBO Trial). Gastroenterology. 2023 Aug;165(2):473-482.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.016. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
citation: Janet J, Albouys J, Napoleon B, Jacques J, Mathonnet M, Magne J, Fontaine M, de Ponthaud C, Durand Fontanier S, Bardet SSM, Bourdariat R, Sulpice L, Lesurtel M, Legros R, Truant S, Robin F, Prat F, Palazzo M, Schwarz L, Buc E, Sauvanet A, Gaujoux S, Taibi A. Pancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus a Transpapillary Stent: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of the ACHBT-FRENCH-SFED Intergroup. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):5036-5046. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13466-8. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
citation: Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, Choi JH, Kim SO, Jang S, Kim DU, Shim JH, Song TJ, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage Versus ERCP for the Primary Palliation of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;113(7):987-997. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
citation: Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better - endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound? Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(2):317-324. doi: 10.1111/den.14186. Epub 2021 Nov 29.