Clinical trial NCT04748965: Imaging-Guided Vessel Sizing in the Tibial Arteries
Official title: Imaging-Guided Vessel Sizing in the Tibial Arteries
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Peripheral Artery Disease
Critical Limb Ischemia
Lead sponsor: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Abbott Medical Devices
First posted: 2021-02-10
Enrollment: 40
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Tibial vessel involvement in patients with underlying peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia.

Brief summary: This study aims to investigate the utilization of intravascular imaging in treatment of tibial vessels in peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia (CLI). The primary goal is to compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) with traditional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in determining best treatment strategy and vessel optimization, in an effort to improve long term patency and successful wound healing in CLI. Secondary comparison with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is undertaken when clinically feasible. The hypothesis is that the adjunctive use of intravascular imaging will affect vessel sizing and anticipated treatment modalities, and therein affect the long term primary patency rates.

Detailed description: This is a prospective, nonrandomized trial to investigate the adjunctive use of intravascular imaging in tibial vessel interventions. The evaluation of OCT is primarily to: (a) establish feasibility and reproducibility in below-the-knee vessels, (b) determine the optimal protocol imaging to produce the optimal clear image frame and clear image length, (c) provide detailed lesion characteristics of tibial disease, (d) assess for luminal gain post-intervention. Operator-determined sizing will be compared against University Hospitals Core Imaging Laboratory assessment of OCT, IVUS (when applicable), and quantitative vessel analysis (QVA).

Subjects will follow up per routine care with corresponding ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months or as clinically indicated. Wound and amputation data will be collected at the pre-procedural visit and with each subsequent visit. Wound care will be managed by our wound care associates in podiatry, vascular medicine, vascular surgery, or plastic surgery.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age \>18
* Patients with presence of Rutherford IV-VI
* Presence of ≥1 tibial artery involvement requiring endovascular treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who do not have tibial disease appropriate for intervention
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 mL/min not on hemodialysis

Primary outcomes:
measure: Standardized Technique for OCT Use in the Lower Limb
timeFrame: 12 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Comparison of Percent Contrast
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics: Minimal Lumen Area
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics: Reference Vessel Diameter
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics: Reference Vessel Area
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics: Percentage Stenosis
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Plaque Characteristics: Morphology
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Plaque Characteristics: Calcium Arc
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Plaque Characteristics: Calcium Depth
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Plaque Characteristics: Fibrous cap
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Attenuation
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics Following Intervention: Luminal Gain
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics Following Intervention: Plaque Modification
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Vessel Characteristics Following Intervention: Dissections
timeFrame: 12 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Beachwood
country: United States
facility: University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center
state: Ohio
city: Cleveland
country: United States
facility: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
state: Ohio
city: Parma
country: United States
facility: University Hospitals Parma Medical Center
state: Ohio
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
name: Jun Li, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.017.
citation: Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, Henry TD, Cox DA, Duffy PL, Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Mazzaferri EL Jr, Xu K, Parise H, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation. 2014 Jan 28;129(4):463-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
citation: Wijns W, Shite J, Jones MR, Lee SW, Price MJ, Fabbiocchi F, Barbato E, Akasaka T, Bezerra H, Holmes D. Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3346-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
citation: Scoccianti M, Verbin CS, Kopchok GE, Back MR, Donayre CE, Sinow RM, White RA. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for peripheral vascular interventions. J Endovasc Surg. 1994 Sep;1:71-80. doi: 10.1583/1074-6218(1994)0012.0.CO;2.
citation: Arthurs ZM, Bishop PD, Feiten LE, Eagleton MJ, Clair DG, Kashyap VS. Evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis: a comparative analysis of angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):933-8; discussion 939. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.034. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
citation: Secco GG, Grattoni C, Parisi R, Oshoala K, Cremonesi A, Fattori R, Castriota F. Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance during Peripheral Vascular Intervention. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;38(3):768-72. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0868-3. Epub 2014 Mar 5. No abstract available.
citation: Eberhardt KM, Treitl M, Boesenecker K, Maxien D, Reiser M, Rieger J. Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography in lower limb arteries compared with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Oct;24(10):1499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
citation: Paraskevopoulos I, Spiliopoulos S, Davlouros P, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K, Alexopoulos D, Siablis D. Evaluation of below-the-knee drug-eluting stents with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography: neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis. J Endovasc Ther. 2013 Feb;20(1):80-93. doi: 10.1583/12-4091.1.
citation: Agarwal S, Sud K, Shishehbor MH. Nationwide Trends of Hospital Admission and Outcomes Among Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: From 2003-2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 26;67(16):1901-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
citation: Ferraresi R, Mauri G, Losurdo F, Troisi N, Brancaccio D, Caravaggi C, Neri L. BAD transmission and SAD distribution: a new scenario for critical limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Oct;59(5):655-664. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10572-6. Epub 2018 May 22.