Clinical trial NCT05343988: Percutaneous Neurostimulation to Treat Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Children
Official title: Percutaneous Neurostimulation for Treatment of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Children With Acute Severe Brain Injury
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
Keywords: peripheral neurostimulator
pediatric
acute severe brain injury
Lead sponsor: Medical College of Wisconsin
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-04-25
Enrollment: 20
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 2
Maximum age (years): 17
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Prospective unblinded pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of use of a peripheral neurostimulator for treatment of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in children with acute severe brain injury
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Survivors of severe brain injury, such as lack of oxygen or severe traumatic brain injury, frequently experience Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity (PSH). PSH is characterized by disabling symptoms such as a fast heart rate, high blood pressure, rapid breathing, rigidity, tremors, and sweating due to uncontrolled sympathetic hyperactivity in the nervous system. Effective treatment is necessary to decrease secondary brain injury, prevent weight loss from increased metabolic demand and reduce suffering. Currently, a combination of medications to slow down the sympathetic nervous system, muscle relaxants, anti-anxiety drugs, gabapentin, and narcotics are used to treat PSH. The sudden, recurrent attacks of PSH often require repeated rescue medications and multiple drugs with a high risk of side effects. Non-drug treatments for PSH may revolutionize treatment. The novel and non-invasive Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) device is an attractive and potentially effective treatment option for PSH.

PENFS, applied to the external ear, has been shown to be effective for conditions such as abdominal pain, narcotic withdrawal, and cyclic vomiting syndrome, all which have similar symptoms to PSH. Therefore, the hypothesis is PENFS could be effective in the treatment of PSH. The electrical current delivered by the PENFS device is thought to increase parasympathetic activity by stimulating a branch of the vagus nerve. PENFS was shown to decrease central sympathetic nervous system activity by 36% within 5 minutes of being placed in the ear of a rat model. Similar central inhibition could improve symptoms of PSH. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility of performing an efficacy trial of PENFS for children with PSH.

Detailed description: Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity - incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and implications for treatment Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity is frequently seen in survivors of acute severe brain injury (ASBI). It is most commonly associated with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) with a reported incidence of 10-20% among survivors of sTBI. Survivors of anoxic brain injury have a higher incidence of PSH (approximately 30%). The pathophysiology of PSH is incompletely understood. Current consensus is that it the result of disconnection between with neuroinhibitory higher centers in the diencephalon and the excitatory pathways in the brainstem and spinal cord (10). PSH is characterized by a constellation of symptoms such as tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension, hyperthermia, rigidity, tremors, sweating, and pupillary dilation as a result of sympathetic hyperactivity due to the brain injury. Research on PSH has been hampered by lack of a uniform definition and use of various terms such as neurostorming, dysautonomia. Consensus diagnostic criteria and a scoring algorithm (CFS) were developed in 2014 (Table 1a,1b). This tool has 2 components - Clinical Feature Scale to score the severity of symptoms and Diagnosis Likelihood Tool (DLT) that lists the diagnostic features to help with initial diagnosis of PSH (Table 1b). The combined CFS and DLT scores are used to assess the likelihood of PSH (Table 1b). We will use a CFS+DLT cut-off of ≥ 10 to diagnose PSH. PSH increases the risk for secondary brain injury and is associated with worse functional outcomes, longer hospitalization and higher healthcare costs. Appropriate treatment of PSH is important for patient comfort and to prevent secondary brain damage.

Currently, PSH is treated using a combination of multiple neurotropic medications (narcotics, benzodiazepines, sympatholytics, gabapentin, muscle relaxants etc.) that can result in complications due to their side effects such as excessive sedation, respiratory depression, drug dependence, and constipation. Some of these medications necessitate ICU stay due to their CNS depressant effects thus potentially increasing healthcare costs. There has been very little research into novel ways of treating PSH other than the use of various neurotropic medications.

Measurement of autonomic function - HRV and Pupillometry Autonomic function can be evaluated clinically and is most commonly measured using heart rate variability (HRV). Established standards for measurement of HRV are available. HRV has been studied in various disease states in the intensive care environment such as post-acute MI, sepsis, multi-organ dysfunction, brain injury, and brain death. HRV is decreased or lost in severe disease and has been shown to be associated with increased mortality in the ICU. Higher sympathetic activity in severe disease states is associated with decreased HRV. HRV was shown to be significantly different between children and adults with ASBI and controls. Similarly, pupillary reactivity is also under autonomic control. Recently, pupillometry has also been used to measure autonomic activity. A pupillometer quantitatively measures pupil size (size, minimum size with light stimulus, % change in pupil size) and reactivity (constriction velocity, max constriction velocity, latency, dilation velocity) that can be compared to established norms and trended over time. These parameters have been shown to reflect sympathetic (dilation velocity) and parasympathetic system (% change in pupil size, latency, constriction velocity) activity and sympatho-parasympathetic balance (baseline pupil size). PSH, as the name implies, is associated with uncontrolled paroxysms of sympathetic activity that results in pupillary dilation among other symptoms. It is conceivable that an increase in parasympathetic activity would alter these parameters that could be compared using the patient as his/her own control.

PENFS device - description, mechanism of action, and applications The PENFS (auricular neurostimulator) device is a novel, non-pharmacological therapy that has been effectively used for various conditions such as functional abdominal pain, chronic pain, and narcotic withdrawal. Recent data from CW also demonstrates efficacy in a pilot study for children with cyclic vomiting syndrome, with improvement in episode severity and frequency lasting an average 5 months (unpublished data). Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disorder of autonomic imbalance manifested by severe sympathetic hyperactivity. Symptoms of nausea/vomiting, pallor, diaphoresis, and tachycardia are similar to PSH. Many of the symptoms of narcotic withdrawal are also very similar to those of PSH including tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension, fever, tremors, and sweating. Clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist with sympatholytic properties is commonly used as an adjunct in the treatment of narcotic withdrawal syndrome. Clonidine is also one of the first-line medications used for treatment of PSH. Thus, it is plausible that PENFS could be effective in treatment of PSH.

The PENFS device is applied over the external ear and is continuously worn for 120 hours at a time. The electrical current stimulates the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and auricular branches of cranial nerves V, VII and IX. The nerves project to the various parts of the brain, including the brainstem nucleus tractus solitarius. fMRI scans in healthy human volunteers have shown significant activation of the central vagal projections by stimulating ABVN. Sympathoinhibition has been shown to be one of the primary mechanisms of action of the device in the various conditions for which it is used. Electrical stimulation of the tragus has been shown to cause central sympathoinhibition in rats by up to 36% within 5 minutes of stimulation. This central sympathoinhibition by the PENFS device could improve the symptoms of PSH.

One of the advantages of PENFS in the treatment of PSH is that it is continuously active while it is worn thus providing symptomatic treatment throughout that period. This could help prevent or ameliorate the paroxysmal symptoms classically seen in PSH and thus reduce the need for rescue medications. The device also has been shown to have a relatively rapid onset of action. A recent study showed that the onset of action was rapid with 63% reduction in narcotic withdrawal score within 20 minutes of activation of the device and 85% reduction within 60 minutes. Thus, PENFS could offer a non-pharmacological tool for managing PSH, helping to decrease the need for maintenance and rescue medications and thus limiting the side effects of some of these medications. Decreased need for neurosedative medications could further decrease the length of ICU stay for these patients thus decreasing healthcare costs. The device is also well-tolerated without any serious adverse effects.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Children 2-17 years age with PSH due to ASBI
* PSH severity score \> 6 (moderate severity)
* Glasgow Coma Scale \< 15

Exclusion Criteria:

* age \< 2 years (small ears thus less surface area to apply the leads)
* ear deformity or severe dermatitis of ear lobes,
* intractable seizures, heart block, patients with other implantable devices (cardiac pacemaker, vagal nerve stimulator, etc.
* known pregnancy

Primary outcomes:
measure: The number of children enrolled (Ages 2-17) with acute severe brain injury (ASBI) and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity (PSH) to use the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) device for treatment
timeFrame: Up to 192 hours.
measure: Study retention for those children enrolled with acute severe brain injury (ASBI) and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity (PSH) to use the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) device for treatment
timeFrame: Up to 192 hours.
measure: Device tolerability for those children enrolled with acute severe brain injury (ASBI) and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity (PSH) to use the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) device for treatment
timeFrame: Up to 192 hours.
measure: Capturing at least 80 percent of scoring events to assess pediatric Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity (PSH) symptoms using the Clinical Feature Severity (CFS) scoring tool
timeFrame: Up to 192 hours.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The change from baseline of the Clinical Feature Scale (CFS) measured throughout the study to 192 hours after device placement
timeFrame: 0 hours before device placement, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours,120 hours-device discontinuation, 132 hours, 144 hours, 156 hours, 168 hours, 180 hours, 192 hours
measure: Measure a change in maintenance and rescue medication use for treatment of PSH
timeFrame: 0-24hours, 25-48hours, 49-72hours, 73-96hours, 97-120hours
measure: Measure pupil size (mm) to determine the change in autonomic response
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure pupil's constriction velocity (mm/sec) to determine the change in autonomic response
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the pupil's dilation velocity (mm/sec) to determine the change in autonomic response
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter: Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN) (msec) to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter: Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD) to determine the change in autonomic response with the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) device use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter: Total power (TP) (ms^2) to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter: High Frequency (HF) (ms^2) to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter Low frequency (LF) to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the Heart Rate Variability (HRV) parameter: Low Frequency: High Frequency (LF:HF) ratio to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
measure: Measure the change in the HRV parameter: Mean Heart Rate (Mean HR) (beats per minute/bpm) to determine the change in autonomic response with Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) use
timeFrame: -12 hours (12 hours before placement), Time 12 hours (12 hours after placement)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Milwaukee
country: United States
facility: Children's Wisconsin
state: Wisconsin
Study officials:
affiliation: Medical College of Wisconsin
name: Binod Balakrishnan, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Fernandez-Ortega JF, Prieto-Palomino MA, Munoz-Lopez A, Lebron-Gallardo M, Cabrera-Ortiz H, Quesada-Garcia G. Prognostic influence and computed tomography findings in dysautonomic crises after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1129-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197634.83217.80.
citation: Baguley IJ, Slewa-Younan S, Heriseanu RE, Nott MT, Mudaliar Y, Nayyar V. The incidence of dysautonomia and its relationship with autonomic arousal following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007 Oct;21(11):1175-81. doi: 10.1080/02699050701687375.
citation: Rabinstein AA. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurol Res. 2007 Oct;29(7):680-2. doi: 10.1179/016164107X240071.
citation: Kirk KA, Shoykhet M, Jeong JH, Tyler-Kabara EC, Henderson MJ, Bell MJ, Fink EL. Dysautonomia after pediatric brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Aug;54(8):759-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04322.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
citation: Fernandez-Ortega JF, Prieto-Palomino MA, Garcia-Caballero M, Galeas-Lopez JL, Quesada-Garcia G, Baguley IJ. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after traumatic brain injury: clinical and prognostic implications. J Neurotrauma. 2012 May 1;29(7):1364-70. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2033. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
citation: Baguley IJ, Nicholls JL, Felmingham KL, Crooks J, Gurka JA, Wade LD. Dysautonomia after traumatic brain injury: a forgotten syndrome? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;67(1):39-43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.39.
citation: Baguley IJ, Heriseanu RE, Cameron ID, Nott MT, Slewa-Younan S. A critical review of the pathophysiology of dysautonomia following traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8(2):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-9021-3.
citation: Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Leavitt K, Duggan C. Severe weight loss and hypermetabolic paroxysmal dysautonomia following hypoxic ischemic brain injury: the role of indirect calorimetry in the intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 May-Jun;32(3):281-4. doi: 10.1177/0148607108316196.
citation: Rabinstein AA, Benarroch EE. Treatment of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2008 Mar;10(2):151-7. doi: 10.1007/s11940-008-0016-y.
citation: Baguley IJ, Heriseanu RE, Felmingham KL, Cameron ID. Dysautonomia and heart rate variability following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006 Apr;20(4):437-44. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664715.
citation: Phillips SS, Mueller CM, Nogueira RG, Khalifa YM. A Systematic Review Assessing the Current State of Automated Pupillometry in the NeuroICU. Neurocrit Care. 2019 Aug;31(1):142-161. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0645-2.
citation: Miranda A, Taca A. Neuromodulation with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation is associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal: a multisite, retrospective assessment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44(1):56-63. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1295459. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
citation: Mahadi KM, Lall VK, Deuchars SA, Deuchars J. Cardiovascular autonomic effects of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation via the tragus in the rat involve spinal cervical sensory afferent pathways. Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):1151-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 6.
citation: Baguley IJ, Perkes IE, Fernandez-Ortega JF, Rabinstein AA, Dolce G, Hendricks HT; Consensus Working Group. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after acquired brain injury: consensus on conceptual definition, nomenclature, and diagnostic criteria. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Sep 1;31(17):1515-20. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3301. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
citation: Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
citation: Kim SW, Jeon HR, Kim JY, Kim Y. Heart Rate Variability Among Children With Acquired Brain Injury. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;41(6):951-960. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.6.951. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
citation: Venkata Sivakumar A, Kalburgi-Narayana M, Kuppusamy M, Ramaswamy P, Bachali S. Computerized dynamic pupillometry as a screening tool for evaluation of autonomic activity. Neurophysiol Clin. 2020 Oct;50(5):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
citation: Pozzi M, Locatelli F, Galbiati S, Radice S, Clementi E, Strazzer S. Clinical scales for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in pediatric patients. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Nov 15;31(22):1897-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3540. Epub 2014 Sep 26. No abstract available.