Clinical trial NCT00167778: Prosthetic Components and Stability in Amputee Gait
Official title: Turning Corners: Prosthetic Components and Stability in Amputee Gait
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Diabetes Mellitus
Leg Injuries
Traumatic Amputation
Keywords: Amputation
Amputee
Artificial limbs
Gait
Locomotion
Walking
Lead sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
Sponsor class: FED
First posted: 2005-09-14
Enrollment: 12
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The biomechanics of changing direction while walking has been largely neglected despite its relevancy to functional mobility. In addition, an increased risk of injury can be associated with turning due to a decrease in stability. The objective of this study is to understand the biomechanics of turning gait in sample populations of intact and trans-tibial amputees and the capacity of prosthetic components to facilitate transverse plane movement. The clinical impact of this investigation is the development of interventions that increase functional mobility, stability and safety while turning.

The researchers propose to investigate three sets of hypotheses. The first set addresses the fundamental biomechanical mechanisms associated with walking along a circular trajectory, how intact subjects differ from amputees, and the effect of a rotation adaptor pylon. The second set of hypotheses addresses dynamic stability and the potential influence of prosthetic interventions. The third set of hypotheses addresses how the rotational properties of the prosthetic pylon can influence comfort and mobility during daily activities.

Detailed description: Most of what is known about how amputees walk and how the properties of prosthetic components affect their gait has been discovered through sagittal plane observations while amputees walk back and forth along a straight line. Abnormal limb loading, thought to be a principal factor in the occurrence of residual limb pain which in turn may cause instability and limit mobility, can certainly occur while walking in a straight line. However, the incidence of abnormal limb loading is likely amplified when performing more complex gait activities, such as turning or avoiding obstacles; activities that are so very common in everyday life.

The specific aims of this investigation are to:

1. discover the biomechanical strategies used and the stability of both intact individuals and trans-tibial amputees walking along a circular trajectory and
2. explore the effects of a prosthetic intervention on turning biomechanics, stability, comfort, and mobility.

We propose to investigate three sets of hypotheses:

The first set of hypotheses addresses the fundamental biomechanical mechanisms associated with walking along a circular trajectory, how intact subjects differ from amputees, and the effect of a rotation adaptor pylon. We will conduct experiments to test three hypotheses related to achieving a change of heading, orientation, and balancing of centripetal forces necessary to walk along a circular trajectory.

The second set of hypotheses seeks to identify whether trans-tibial amputees with a rigid pylon are more unstable during a turning task than non-amputees and whether or not the rotation adaptors enhance stability. We will conduct experiments to calculate an index of dynamic stability that measures the rate at which a person can respond to a perturbation and return to a stable gait pattern.

The third set of hypotheses addresses how the rotational properties of the prosthetic pylon can influence comfort and mobility during daily activities. To measure comfort and mobility, we will solicit questionnaire responses and step count measures from amputees after a one-month period of wearing a rigid pylon and after a one-month period of wearing a transverse plane rotation adaptor (within-subject comparison). In addition to these field measurements, we will also compare the distance traveled during a six-minute walk. Patient opinions about their prosthesis and mobility measures over long periods of time can play a significant role in prosthesis evaluation.

For veteran amputees who experience discomfort and increased risk for residual limb skin problems, it seems reasonable to suppose that these problems might occur when walking along a curved trajectory rather than just a straight line. The joint forces and moments of turning may differ significantly from those exhibited while walking in a straight line. The proposed research will create a new knowledge base with which to understand prosthetic intervention effectiveness. The immediate clinical impact for the trans-tibial amputee is the determination if transverse plane rotational adapter pylons can improve their comfort, mobility, and stability.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Amputee Subjects:

  * be a unilateral trans-tibial amputee between the ages of 18 and 70,
  * weigh 220 pounds or less,
  * have been fit with a prosthesis and using a prosthesis for at least two years,
  * wear the prosthesis for at least 8 hours per day,
  * walk without crutches or a walker,
  * able to walk outside the home and in the community,
  * have not fallin within the last six months,
* Non-amputee subjects participating in this investigation will meet similar inclusion criteria except for those related to prosthesis use.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Amputee Subjects:

  * amputation due to tumor, have an active tumor, or are undergoing treatment of a tumor,
  * have pain in legs or any condition that interferes with walking.
* Non-amputee subjects participating in this investigation will meet similar exclusion criteria except for those related to cause of amputation.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Straight Walking)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Straight Walking)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Straight Walking)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Inside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Hip During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Knee During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Local Dynamic Stability (Ankle During Turning With the Prosthesis on the Outside of the Turn)
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Hip While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Knee While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Outside Ankle While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Hip While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Knee While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Peak External Rotation Moment of the Inside Ankle While Turning
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks.
measure: Activity Level
timeFrame: One week
measure: Six-minute Walk Distance
timeFrame: Six minutes after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
measure: Residual Limb Pain at Present?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks
measure: Average Residual Limb Pain?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
measure: Worst Residual Limb Pain?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
measure: Least Residual Limb Pain?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
measure: Pain Interference With Activities?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
measure: How Bothersome Was Your Pain?
timeFrame: Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for four weeks.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle
name: Glenn K. Klute, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: