Clinical trial NCT04145089: Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients
Official title: Comparative Study of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac Video Laryngoscopy With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Paediatric Airway
Lead sponsor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-10-30
Enrollment: 64
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 3
Maximum age (years): 12
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: GlideScope intubation Vs Cmac intubation
Primary purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Brief summary: This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.

Detailed description: This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Paediatric patients 3-12 years old undergoing elective surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1-2
* No difficult airway features/history of difficult intubation
* Not obese

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any difficult intubation features/history of difficult intubation
* Obese child

Primary outcomes:
measure: Intubation time
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Cormack Lehane view
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Other outcomes:
measure: Additional maneuvre to assist intubation
timeFrame: 5 minutes
measure: adverse events
timeFrame: 5 minutes
Locations:
city: Kuala Lumpur
country: Malaysia
facility: Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Study officials:
affiliation: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
name: Syarifah Noor Nazihah Sayed Masri, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway management: basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Jan;53(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01794.x.
citation: Armstrong J, John J, Karsli C. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65(4):353-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06294.x.
citation: Mosier J, Chiu S, Patanwala AE, Sakles JC. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):414-420.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
citation: Hurford DM, White MC. A comparison of the Glidescope and Karl Storz DCI videolaryngoscopes in a paediatric manikin. Anaesthesia. 2010 Aug;65(8):781-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06390.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
citation: Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):531-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen234. Epub 2008 Aug 8.