Clinical trial NCT02603900: Adductor Canal Catheter vs Local Infiltration of Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty
Official title: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) and Local Infiltration of Analgesia (LIA) Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Acute Pain
Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
Keywords: Adductor Canal Catheter
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Local infiltration of analgesia
Lead sponsor: Thomas Jefferson University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-11-13
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 40
Maximum age (years): 85
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing local infiltration of analgesia in the knee joint and adductor canal catheters for postoperative analgesia following a primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

Detailed description: The study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two methods of postoperative analgesia following primary TKA. Eligible primary TKA patients must be ASA I - III and require less than 20 mg oxycodone daily (or its equivalent). Exclusion criteria are: allergy to anesthetics, contraindication to regional anesthesia, sensory/ motor disorder involving operative limb, non-english speaking, ASA IV or greater, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, incarceration, renal insufficiency with Cr \> 2.0 and hepatic failure. When patients agree to participate in the study the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, quantitative opiate use, numeric pain score with visual descriptors, painDETECT score, WOMAC score and baseline Pain Management Questionnaire. When designated through randomization, local infiltration of analgesia will be placed intraoperatively by the surgeons, per usual protocol and patients in the LIA group will receive sham adductor canal catheter. All ACC's for both study groups will be placed postoperatively in the PACU. Those collecting data will be blinded from identifying patients in the control group, as both groups will have ACC placed with same technique. Potential risks for each procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity in the form of seizure and cardiac arrest and neuropathy. The preceding are commonly listed though infrequent complications of both procedures. Continuous ultrasound will guide the placement of the ACC. All adductor canal catheters will remain in for 72 hours. Pt from LIA group will be discharged home with sham catheter with a saline infusion at 10 ml/hr via an ambulatory pump. Patients in ACC group will be discharged with continuous adductor canal catheter delivering ropivacaine 0.2% at 10 ml/hr via an ambulatory pump. Patients will be called daily for pain diary results. As well as at 6-8 weeks postoperatively to collect painDetect and WOMAC survey.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 40-85
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) 1-3. • Undergoing Unilateral, Primary, Total Knee Arthroplasty
* English as native language

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patient refusal
* History of opioid dependence
* Contraindication to peripheral nerve block • Pre-existing significant neuropathy

Primary outcomes:
measure: Post-operative pain via numeric rating scale at rest and with activity during each physical therapy session
timeFrame: post-operative day #0 to post-operative day #3
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Postoperative opioid consumption
timeFrame: post-operative day #0 to postoperative day # 3
measure: Chronic post-surgical pain measured via validated painDetect and WOMAC questionnaires
timeFrame: 6-8 weeks after surgical date
measure: Passive and Active Range of Motion during Physical Therapy
timeFrame: POD #0 to postoperative day #2
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Philadelphia
country: United States
facility: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
state: Pennsylvania
Study officials:
affiliation: Thomas Jefferson University
name: Jaime L Baratta, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
citation: Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
citation: Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):774-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6.
citation: Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
citation: Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.