Clinical trial NCT02722109: Dual Energy CT: A New Method for Better Dose Calculation in Proton Beam Therapy
Official title: Dual Energy CT: A New Method for Better Dose Calculation in Proton Beam Therapy
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Conditions: Cancer
Lead sponsor: Aarhus University Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-03-29
Enrollment: 14
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: OTHER
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: * Patients with a identified tumor referred to curativ intended external beam radiotherapy
* Patients, for who are scheduled for a control CT scan during their treatment course
* Patients above 18 years of age
* Participation will take place on a voluntary basis It is estimated that annually around 1,000 patients will meet the above inclusion criteria

Brief summary: Researchers want to compare proton stopping ratios, used for proton beam therapy planning, calculated based on single energy CT and dual energy CT images; with the intension of improve upon the proton range determination.

Detailed description: The main goal of this study is to compare proton stopping ratios, used for proton beam therapy planning, calculated based on single energy CT and dual energy CT images.

The calculation methods for proton stopping power ratios differs for the two types of CT images, and researchers want to investigate if the proton stopping power ratio can be estimated more accurately by using dual energy CT. A more accurate stopping power ratio calculation gives a more accurate proton range determination in the patient tissue, which again will lead to a better knowledge of the dose distribution in the patient undergoing cancer treatment with proton beam irradiation.

Knowing the accurate dose distribution allows for an uncertainty margin reduction around the tumor, which will result in less normal tissue being irradiated and thereby the risk of side effects is reduced without risking an under-dosage of the tumor.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Cancer patients who are scheduled for a control CT scan

Exclusion Criteria:

* Under 18 years of age

Primary outcomes:
measure: Stopping power ratio differences
timeFrame: 2 months
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Aarhus University Hospital
name: Cai Grau, Professor
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Engelsman M, Schwarz M, Dong L. Physics controversies in proton therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013 Apr;23(2):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.11.003.
citation: Knopf AC, Lomax A. In vivo proton range verification: a review. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Aug 7;58(15):R131-60. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/15/R131. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
citation: Johnson TR. Dual-energy CT: general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S3-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9116.
citation: Hunemohr N, Krauss B, Tremmel C, Ackermann B, Jakel O, Greilich S. Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Jan 6;59(1):83-96. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/1/83. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
citation: Bourque AE, Carrier JF, Bouchard H. A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2014 Apr 21;59(8):2059-88. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/8/2059. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
citation: Hall EJ. Henry S. Kaplan Distinguished Scientist Award 2003. The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol. 2004 May;80(5):327-37. doi: 10.1080/09553000410001695895.
citation: Paganetti H. Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 7;57(11):R99-117. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/R99. Epub 2012 May 9.
citation: Hudobivnik N, Schwarz F, Johnson T, Agolli L, Dedes G, Tessonnier T, Verhaegen F, Thieke C, Belka C, Sommer WH, Parodi K, Landry G. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images. Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):495. doi: 10.1118/1.4939106.
citation: Hansen DC, Seco J, Sorensen TS, Petersen JB, Wildberger JE, Verhaegen F, Landry G. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1638-42. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1061212. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
citation: Yang M, Virshup G, Clayton J, Zhu XR, Mohan R, Dong L. Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues. Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 7;55(5):1343-62. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/006. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
citation: Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 1996 Jan;41(1):111-24. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/1/009.