Clinical trial NCT06184685: Safety and Efficacy of Sahasthara ME vs Diclofenac ME for Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
Official title: A Comparative Double-Blinded Randomized Study: Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Sahasthara Microemulsion Versus Diclofenac Microemulsion for Treating Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
Keywords: Clinical
Topical
Microemulsion
Sahasthara
Diclofenac
Knee Osteoarthritis
Lead sponsor: Thammasat University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-12-28
Enrollment: 87
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 40
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Background: Sahasthara is a traditional Thai herbal remedy used for the anti-inflammatory treatment of the musculoskeletal system, while diclofenac sodium is one of the most topically administered anti-inflammatory drug. However, there has not been scientifically researched regarding the efficacy and safety of SHT formulated as ME.

Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of Sahasthara microemulsion (SHT-ME) in comparison to a diclofenac microemulsion (DF-ME) in treating primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Methods: A randomized, double blinded clinical trial phase II was conducted. One treatment group received 1% SHT-ME, while the other received 2% DF-ME (2 ml, 3 times per day for 28 days) on their affected knee area. All patients were followed up at 14 and 28 days. Changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain as well as 100-meter walking times, the WOMAC index scores, and a global assessment were examined for efficacy. Clinical examinations, abnormalities in laboratory tests, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed for safety.

Detailed description: Outpatient participants, aged between 40 - 70 years old, were recruited. They were screened for symptoms of primary knee OA at the Department of Orthopedics, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand, between October - December 2021. A diagnosis of knee OA in this clinical trial were made with a combination of clinical and radiographic findings according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Inclusion criteria for participants were those who had a pain score higher than 30 mm out of 100 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS), experiencing moderate to severe pain intensity from OA in one or both knees (patients who affected by knee OA bilaterally were evaluated, which more severely affected knee was included in the study) and had OA grade 1 to 3 (moderate/medium degree of pain) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification grading scale for OA severity. The subjects would be excluded if they: 1) had a history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in SHT ME or DF-ME, 2) were pregnant or breast feeding, 3) had previous surgery knee replacement or intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months of inclusion in the study, 4) were having any coexisting musculoskeletal diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis, septic arthritis, metabolic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, and traumatic arthritis ) or dermatologic disorder which affected the surrounding skin of the knees, or 5) was assessed by body mass index (BMI) more than 32 kg/m2. The participants who were accepted to enroll in the study signed an informed consent.

Following enrollment, eligible patients were given a washout period of one week with no administration of analgesics before being randomly assigned to receive one of the treatments daily for 4 weeks. A randomized code number from a non-stratified randomization list generated by computer was used. The physicians, researchers, and statisticians were blinded from the allocation of patients involved in the trial. During the study, they were instructed not to use other analgesics, including injection drugs or other medications. Following the baseline visit, patients returned to the study site after 2 and 4 weeks for follow-up assessments of safety, efficacy and study protocol compliance.

In the trial, demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms, physical examination, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, 100-meter walk times, the WOMAC index scores (pain, physical function, stiffness), and laboratory tests (fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP), and renal function tests (BUN, creatinine clearance)) were collected as baseline data and as study data on day 14 and on day 28

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* who had a pain score higher than 30 mm out of 100 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS)
* experiencing moderate to severe pain intensity from OA in one or both knees (patients who affected by knee OA bilaterally were evaluated, which more severely affected knee was included in the study) and had OA grade 1 to 3 (moderate/medium degree of pain) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification grading scale for OA severity

Exclusion Criteria:

* had a history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in SHT ME or DF-ME
* were pregnant or breast feeding
* had previous surgery knee replacement or intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months of inclusion in the study
* were having any coexisting musculoskeletal diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis, septic arthritis, metabolic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, and traumatic arthritis ) or dermatologic disorder which affected the surrounding skin of the knees
* was assessed by body mass index (BMI) more than 32 kg/m2

Primary outcomes:
measure: The WOMAC index
timeFrame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The visual analogue scale (VAS)
timeFrame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
Other outcomes:
measure: 100-meter time walk
timeFrame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
measure: The global assessment
timeFrame: 28 days (ฺDay0, Day14, Day28)
Locations:
city: Klong Luang
country: Thailand
facility: Thammasat University
state: Pathum Thani
Study officials:
References: