Clinical trial NCT05088278: Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
Official title: Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament
knee osteoarthritis
hamstrings
patellar tendon
lateral extra articular tenodesis
Lead sponsor: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-10-21
Enrollment: 41
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 30
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of various anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. This assessment is necessary for the current context of anterior cruciate ligament research as several techniques and grafts are used in clinical practice, however, the various studies existing in the literature focus mainly only on the direct comparison of two techniques and usually with short-to-medium term follow-up. Since gonarthrosis is one of the most debated consequences of cruciate ligament reconstruction, a comparison of different long-term procedures would be desirable to have a clearer picture of the risks and benefits associated with different types of intervention.

Detailed description: In the beginning, the Database of our Institute is consulted, all the patients that underwent ACL reconstruction at least 15 years ago are selected. The original group will be divided into subgroups based on the surgical technique adopted, of the different techniques we took into consideration only these three: anatomical ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon, anatomical ACL reconstruction with hamstrings, non-anatomical ACL reconstruction "Over-the-top plus lateral plasty". The patients will be contacted to ask if they are interested to take part in the study; at least 25 patients for each group will be recruited. All the patients recruited will sign an informed consent about the study and the personal data treatment. After consent acquisition, patients will undergo a clinical examination and a questionnaire about pain and knee status will be administered; moreover, a radiographical examination of the operated knee will be performed to assess the osteoarthritis progression. Patients that reported graft rupture will be registered as failures.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with single-bundle anatomical technique (patellar tendon, semitendinous and gracile tendons) or "Over-The-Top plus lateral plastic" technique and any associated procedures with at least 15 years of follow up;
2. Patients aged between 15 and 50 at the time of surgery;
3. Patients with isolated ACL tear;
4. Patients with healthy contralateral knee at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with grade III-IV chondral lesions according to Outerbridge scale at surgery;
2. Patients no longer available;
3. Women of childbearing age who cannot exclude pregnancy;
4. Patients unable to give informed consent or patients unwilling to sign informed consent.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee
timeFrame: Two years
measure: VAS pain
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Kellgreen-Lawrence
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Knee Laxity
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Failure and complications
timeFrame: Two years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Short Form-36 Health Survey
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Anterior knee pain
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Global satisfaction about the surgical procedure
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Tight circumference
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Lysholm knee scoring scale
timeFrame: Two years
measure: Tegner activity scale
timeFrame: Two years
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Bologna
country: Italy
facility: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Study officials:
affiliation: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
name: Stefano Zaffagnini, MD Prof
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
citation: Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, Buchko G, Hiemstra LA, Willits KR, Firth A, MacDonald P; Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
citation: Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C, Urrizola F, Spinnato P, Rimondi E, Marcacci M. Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
citation: Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, Zhu B, Chen J, Chen H, Yang F, Chen Y, Lai Q, Liu X. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1459-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
citation: Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
citation: Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.
citation: Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C, Morin V, Grimaud O, Bouguennec N, Pujol N, Sonnery-Cottet B, Graveleau N; French Society for Orthopaedic, Trauma Surgery (Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, SoFCOT). Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
citation: Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.