Clinical trial NCT00346840: Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
Official title: Controlled-Release Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Parous Women for Labor Induction: Randomized Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Labor Induction
Cervical Ripening
Keywords: Labor induction
cervical ripening
misoprostol
vaginal insert
Lead sponsor: Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2006-06-30
Enrollment: 124
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The primary objective of the study was assessment of the efficacy of four dose reservoirs (25 mcg, 50 mcg, 100 mcg, 200 mcg) of intravaginal controlled release misoprostol administered for up to 24 hours. Efficacy was measured in terms of time from insert placement to vaginal delivery.

Detailed description: Approximately 20% of pregnant women require medical intervention to induce labour for reasons including post-date pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, maternal diabetes, premature rupture of the membranes and intra-uterine fetal growth retardation. There are two fundamental changes that characterise pre-labour preparation for delivery: sensitisation of the myometrium to produce contractions, and ripening (softening and dilation) of the cervix. Prostaglandins (PG) are fundamental to both of these changes, and several forms have been used to successfully induce labour. Dinoprostone (PGE2) is an example of a cervical ripening agent that is available in gel and tablet form and has a proven record of successful cervical ripening in this population. Dinoprostone is also available in a controlled release vaginal delivery system, which is manufactured by Controlled Therapeutics (Scotland) a subsidiary of Cytokine PharmaSciences, Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA.

Another synthetic prostaglandin that has been shown to be an effective cervical ripener and labour inducer is misoprostol. Oral tablets are broken into fragments and used intravaginally to ripen the cervix and induce labour Due to the disadvantages of existing cervical ripeners (delivery of bolus doses, freezer or refrigerated storage, lack of efficacy in labour induction), and due to safety concerns with the off-label use of oral misoprostol tablet fragments, Controlled Therapeutics has developed a controlled release vaginal delivery system similar to its marketed dinoprostone product but containing misoprostol.

This study examines four dose strengths of the misoprostol vaginal insert in women who need to have their labours induced.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* At term (37 to 42 weeks inclusive gestation).
* Aged 18 years or older.
* One previous full term delivery (at least 37 weeks gestation).
* Singleton pregnancy.
* Cephalic presentation (normal lie).
* Bishop score more than 6 as determined by MBS criteria.
* Uncomplicated pregnancy as judged by the physician.
* Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* four previous full term deliveries.
* Previous uterine surgery, including C-section and surgery to the cervix of the uterus (cone biopsy of the cervix is permitted).
* In spontaneous labour.
* Administration of oxytocin or a tocolytic drug or any other cervical ripening or labour inducing agent prior to enrolment (within seven days of enrolment).
* Suspected cephalo-pelvic disproportion.
* Evidence or suggestion of fetal distress.
* Subject has received NSAID (including aspirin) within four hours of study treatment (topical is permitted).
* Pyrexia (oral or aural temperature \> 37.5C).
* Unexplained genital bleeding during this pregnancy after 24 weeks.
* Current pelvic inflammatory disease, unless adequate prior treatment has been instituted.
* Placenta praevia.
* Known or suspected allergy to misoprostol or other prostaglandins.
* Prior serious adverse event related to prostaglandin administered by any route for any indication.
* Subject unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time to vaginal delivery.
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to neonate delivery
Secondary outcomes:
measure: uterine hyperstimulation
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to neonate delivery
measure: safety in terms of maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to neonate delivery
measure: Success on composite modified Bishop score (MBS)at 12 hours after drug insertion
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to 12 hours
measure: frequency and amount of oxytocin use
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to neonate delivery
measure: drug release characteristics in terms of residual concentrations
timeFrame: From insertion of study drug to removal of study drug
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Birmingham
country: United Kingdom
facility: Birmingham Women's Hospital
city: Glasgow
country: United Kingdom
facility: Princess Royal Maternity Hospital
city: Ilford
country: United Kingdom
facility: King George Hospital
city: Liverpool
country: United Kingdom
facility: Liverpool Women's Hospital
city: Northampton
country: United Kingdom
facility: Northampton General Hospital
city: Yorkhill, Glasgow
country: United Kingdom
facility: The Queen's Mother's Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Pleiad, Inc.
name: Helen Colquhoun, MD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Castaneda CS, Izquierdo Puente JC, Leon Ochoa RA, Plasse TF, Powers BL, Rayburn WF. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.072.
citation: Rayburn WF, Powers BL, Plasse TF, Carr D, Di Spirito M. Pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert at term. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006 Feb;13(2):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2005.10.004.
citation: Ewert K, Powers B, Robertson S, Alfirevic Z. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1130-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239100.16166.5a.