Clinical trial NCT07002996: Spatial Memory Training and Cognitive Function
Official title: Spatial Memory Training and Cognitive Function
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Mild Cognitive Impairment
Keywords: Memory
Spatial Memory
Hippocampus
Cognitive Training
Cognitive Decline
Aging
Lead sponsor: Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
First posted: 2025-06-04
Enrollment: 80
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 60
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often considered a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). Patients with MCI have subjective memory complaints corroborated by standard neuropsychological tests but remain functionally autonomous. One of the first brain regions to show AD pathology is the hippocampus (HPC). Reduction in HPC volume is a strong predictor of AD dementia. Therefore, improvement or restoration of HPC structure and function is thus an attractive target for improvement in memory and AD prevention strategies. In the current study, the investigators propose to examine the effects of a 3-month long spatial memory program on spatial memory and the hippocampus in patients diagnosed with MCI. Neuropsychological tests are also administered before and after the training to assess the effects of the intervention on cognition. In our previous research, the investigators have shown that spatial memory intervention program (SMIP) improves cognition and hippocampal based spatial memory compared to controls.

Detailed description: The hippocampus (HPC) is a labile structure capable of neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity throughout the lifespan, which is thought to underlie its role in learning and memory, particularly of autobiographical and spatial events. Numerous studies have associated the integrity of the hippocampus with performance in way-finding. In fact, it has been demonstrated that individuals who acquired a cognitive representation of an environment with greater ease possessed more hippocampal gray matter, which was positively correlated with experience. These and other similar studies have suggested that the hippocampus' ability to process spatial memory can be modulated by experience or practice.

Studies have demonstrated increased grey matter in the HPC of both young and older human adults as a function of memory training. Interestingly, the HPC shows signs of neurogenesis across the entire lifespan and, in adult primates, this HPC neurogenesis can be stimulated through learning and memory programs that increase HPC cellular survival. Similar training programs may thus enhance HPC cellular survival in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients by focusing on the region where the pathology first emerges. While several memory intervention studies have shown success in alleviating memory impairments in participants with subjective cognitive impairment, MCI, and in patients with Alzheimer's disease by presumably affecting the HPC, this has not yet been supported by brain imaging or assessment. By contrast, using virtual reality-based tools, the investigators have developed an innovative learning and memory program. In previous research with healthy older adults, the investigators have shown that spatial memory intervention program (SMIP) improves cognition and hippocampal-based spatial memory compared to controls. In addition, the investigators have shown a positive impact of such training on HPC grey matter. These grey matter changes in the HPC were beneficial to healthy cognition as they correlated to improvements in memory.

In the current study, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a 12-week spatial memory intervention to an active control condition. The design will be stratified according to age, education, and sex. After an eligibility assessment at baseline, participants meeting inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups with a 50% probability of being enrolled in either a spatial memory intervention or an active placebo condition. In addition, participants will be given a pre-training psychometric battery, which will be repeated twice during two post-training sessions (at one- and 26 weeks post-training) to assess cognition, daily functioning, stress, health, physical activity, quality of life, and self-esteem. The battery will also include independent computerized spatial memory tests assessing the generalization of cognitive improvement in the spatial domain, as well as paper and pencil memory tests described below.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 60 years and above.
2. Primary language is English or French.
3. Individuals having received a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Self-reported having either of the following:

   Current post-traumatic stress disorder and/or generalized anxiety disorder; Substance use disorder; Significant heart disease (i.e., stroke occurring during 5 years prior to study assessment or cardiac disease non-stabilized with medication); Severe Depression, or a Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score greater than 12; Current insomnia disorder.
2. Current medications for sleep problems, or use of medications that affect sleep.
3. Use of antidepressant and anti-anxiety medication for less than 3 months prior to study entry.
4. Use of analgesics with codeine (or other opioids).
5. Use of antipsychotic medication (past or current).
6. Having undergone brain surgery or ECT.
7. Self-reported colour-blindness.
8. General anesthesia in the past year.
9. Current smoker.
10. Suspected or confirmed traumatic brain injury during the last 24 months.
11. Motion sickness or intolerant to virtual reality tasks.
12. Cholesterol or hypertension medication for less than 3 months or changes expected within the next 9 months.
13. History or presence of neurological or psychiatric disorders (other than MCI) that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
14. Current severe medical conditions (e.g. untreated diabetes, cancer) that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
15. For female participants, severe menopausal symptoms, including hot flashes (determined from the Greene climacteric scale - any participants scoring over 15 is excluded).
16. Use of computer games that are designed to help with memory or general cognition.
17. Presence of any medical or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, may compromise the study objectives.
18. Presence of contra-indications for MRI scanning.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in hippocampal atrophy score using SNIPE (Scoring by Non-local Image Patch Estimator)
timeFrame: From study entry to Week 16 in hippocampus SNIPE grading.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Hippocampal volume.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 16 and 41.
measure: Change in hippocampal atrophy score using SNIPE (Scoring by Non-local Image Patch Estimator) at 41 weeks post-study entry.
timeFrame: From study entry to Week 41.
measure: Changes in spatial memory performance.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in spatial memory performance: radial maze task.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in spatial memory performance: Paired arms radial maze task.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in spatial memory performance: Way-finding task.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in verbal learning performance
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Change in visual memory performance.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in general cognition.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in general intelligence level.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in selective attention performance.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in visuomotor working memory performance: Trail making
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported sense of direction: Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported sense of direction: Sense of Direction Questionnaire- Short-Form
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported well-being.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported meta-memory.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported attention, memory, and cognition in everyday life.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported quality of life.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in perceived stress.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in mindfulness.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in State-Trait Anxiety.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in knowledge, usage, and opinions regarding GPS technology.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in ability to perform activities in daily living.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in cognitive reserve level.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in physical activity level.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in Mini Mental State Exam score.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale scores.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in autobiographical memory.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in verbal fluency performance.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in quality of life.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported memory ability.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-reported memory complaint.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in self-esteem.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in impulsivity.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Impact of spatial memory training on self-reported memory performance.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Changes in inhibitory control.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
measure: Effect of spatial memory training on subjective memory.
timeFrame: From study entry to weeks 15 and 40.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Douglas Mental Health University Institute
name: Véronique Bohbot, Ph.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Bohbot VD, Iaria G, Petrides M. Hippocampal function and spatial memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging in healthy participants and performance of patients with medial temporal lobe resections. Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):418-25. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.418.
citation: Bohbot VD, Lerch J, Thorndycraft B, Iaria G, Zijdenbos AP. Gray matter differences correlate with spontaneous strategies in a human virtual navigation task. J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 19;27(38):10078-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1763-07.2007.
citation: Iaria G, Petrides M, Dagher A, Pike B, Bohbot VD. Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5945-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05945.2003.