Clinical trial NCT05081063: Low-Titer O Positive Whole Blood Versus Component Therapy for Emergent Transfusion in Trauma Patients
Official title: Low-Titer O Positive Whole Blood Versus Component Therapy for Emergent Transfusion in Trauma Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Hemorrhagic Shock
Acute Blood Loss Anemia
Traumatic Brain Injury
Lead sponsor: Loma Linda University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-10-18
Enrollment: 201
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Adult male patients brought to the emergency department as Level A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusion
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Adult male patients brought to the emergency department as Level A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusion.

Objectives

1. Evaluate PRBC equivalents transfused in each group in the first 24 hours (Primary outcome)
2. Evaluate total transfusion in each group in the first 24 hours (Secondary Outcome) including breakdown by FFP equivalents, platelet units, and cryoprecipitate
3. Evaluate 6 hour, 24 hour, and hospital mortality (Secondary Outcome)
4. Evaluate ICU outcomes in each group

Detailed description: Based on the results from Cotton et al, median transfusion in the component therapy group was 6 PRBC in the first 24 hours and 4 PRBC equivalents in the whole blood group. The standard deviation (estimated from the interquartile range) was approximately 4. Thus with an expectation of alpha = 0.05 and expected power of 90% to detect a similar 2 unit difference in transfusion volume, a sample size of 190 should be sufficient; thus projected sample size of 200 should be more than adequate. Age range will be 18 years and older, and only males will be included in the study. Expected racial/ethnic distribution will be approximately 60% white, 15% black, 8% Asian, and 18% other race. No actual recruitment will be performed; rather all qualifying patients will be included. Consent waiver is being requested.

b. Objectives

1. Evaluate PRBC equivalents transfused in each group in the first 24 hours (Primary outcome)
2. Evaluate total transfusion in each group in the first 24 hours (Secondary Outcome) including breakdown by FFP equivalents, platelet units, and cryoprecipitate
3. Evaluate 6 hour, 24 hour, and hospital mortality (Secondary Outcome)
4. Evaluate ICU outcomes in each group:

1. ICU length of stay 2. Ventilator days 3. SOFA score on day of ICU discharge 4. Presence of ARDS 5. Presence of TRALI 6. Presence of DVT/PE 7. Necessity for Dialysis 8. Necessity for Tracheostomy 9. Evaluate viscoelastic testing parameters in both groups when sent on arrival in ICU

1. Percentage of patients with EXTEM clotting time \> 80 sec 2. Percentage of patients with EXTEM amplitude at 10 min \< 40mm and FIBTEM amplitude at 10 min ≤ 10mm 3. Percentage of patients with EXTEM amplitude at 10 min \< 40mm and FIBTEM amplitude at 10 min \> 10mm 4. Percentage of patients with maximum thrombolysis \> 15% 5. Interval analyses to be performed after 6 and 12 months with provision to continue the study out to 24 months.

1. Stopping rule: A statistically significant difference in hospital mortality at 6 months or 12 months

1. If in favor of LTOWB, consideration of trial termination and making LTOWB the primary standard of care for all trauma patients receiving emergency transfusion except for child-bearing age females (unless Rh immunoglobulin can be administered)
2. If in favor of component therapy, consideration of trial termination and making component therapy the primary standard care for all trauma patients receiving emergency transfusion

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* all adult male patients brought into the emergency department as LEVEL A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusions

Exclusion Criteria:

* Female patients (specifically excluded due to risk of alloimmunization of Rh-negative female patients of childbearing age against Rh-positive blood)
* children
* prisoners
* all patients classified as dead upon arrival to the trauma bay

Primary outcomes:
measure: pRBC equivalents transfused
timeFrame: 24 hours post ED admission
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Mortality
timeFrame: Change between ED admission date and 24 hours post discharge
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Loma Linda
country: United States
facility: Loma Linda University Health
state: California
Study officials:
References:
citation: Williams J, Merutka N, Meyer D, Bai Y, Prater S, Cabrera R, Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Love JD, Cotton BA. Safety profile and impact of low-titer group O whole blood for emergency use in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):87-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002498.
citation: Murphy C, Silva de Leonardi N. The use of low-titer group O whole blood is independently associated with improved survival compared to component therapy in adults with severe traumatic hemorrhage. Transfusion. 2021 Apr;61(4):1341-1342. doi: 10.1111/trf.16266. No abstract available.
citation: Seheult JN, Anto V, Alarcon LH, Sperry JL, Triulzi DJ, Yazer MH. Clinical outcomes among low-titer group O whole blood recipients compared to recipients of conventional components in civilian trauma resuscitation. Transfusion. 2018 Aug;58(8):1838-1845. doi: 10.1111/trf.14779. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
citation: Hanna K, Bible L, Chehab M, Asmar S, Douglas M, Ditillo M, Castanon L, Tang A, Joseph B. Nationwide analysis of whole blood hemostatic resuscitation in civilian trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Aug;89(2):329-335. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002753.
citation: Cotton BA, Podbielski J, Camp E, Welch T, del Junco D, Bai Y, Hobbs R, Scroggins J, Hartwell B, Kozar RA, Wade CE, Holcomb JB; Early Whole Blood Investigators. A randomized controlled pilot trial of modified whole blood versus component therapy in severely injured patients requiring large volume transfusions. Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):527-32; discussion 532-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4ffa0.