Clinical trial NCT06724770: Design of an Intervention to Equip Middle Managers and Managers in Healthcare Institutions with Tools to Increase the Resilience of Their Teams
Official title: Diseño De Una Intervención Para Dotar a Mandos Intermedios Y Directivos De Instituciones Sanitarias Con Herramientas Para Incrementar La Resiliencia De Sus Equipos
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Occupational Health
Resilience
Job Stress
Well-being At Work
Highly Stressful Situations
Healthcare Worker
Lead sponsor: Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Foundation for the Promotion of Healthcare and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Community (FISABIO)
First posted: 2024-12-09
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 26
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Participants voluntarily adhere to the intervention. The intervention consists of the review and use of the e-Resilience tool. It is a toolkit that provides training in skills to strengthen the resilience of teams working in healthcare institutions. Participants complete knowledge questionnaires before and after the intervention. There is no control group.
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The main objective of this preparatory action (experimental study without control group, before and after measurements) is to develop and test the feasibility of the e-Resilience tool in a relevant environment (TRL6). This web-based tool has been designed to facilitate the work of the top and middle management of healthcare institutions to strengthen the resilience of their teams to face critical situations inherent to healthcare activity.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Which components of the e-Resilience intervention need to be improved?
2. Does the e-Resilience tool improve the knowledge of middle managers in healthcare institutions on specific techniques and strategies to strengthen the resilience of the professionals and teams under their care?
3. Is the e-Resilience tool helpful and applicable to clinical settings in the opinion of middle managers in healthcare institutions?

Participants in the study are middle management and healthcare professionals from primary care centres and hospitals in the Valencian Community (Spain). A group of experts review the components of the intervention/tool to improve its adaptability to clinical settings. Subsequently, a sample of healthcare professionals and middle managers complete the intervention by answering a knowledge questionnaire before and after the intervention and a survey to evaluate the tool.

There is no control group.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Healthcare professionals and middle management in active healthcare institutions.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inability to complete the web-based intervention due to access difficulties or lack of digital literacy.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Number of incorporations and adaptations necessary for the validation of e-Resilience in a relevant environment.
timeFrame: 5 months
measure: Hits on resilience knowledge questionnaire (pre-intervention).
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Hits on resilience knowledge questionnaire (post-intervention).
timeFrame: 3 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Clarity of the e-Resilience tool components.
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Usefulness and applicability of the e-Resilience tool.
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Perception of improvement of own capacity to strengthen the resilience of healthcare teams.
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Willingness to recommend e-Resilience.
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Willingness to use e-Resilience in the future.
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Overall satisfaction with the e-Resilience intervention.
timeFrame: 3 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Elche
country: Spain
facility: Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
state: Alicante
Study officials:
References:
citation: Seys D, Panella M, Russotto S, Strametz R, Joaquin Mira J, Van Wilder A, Godderis L, Vanhaecht K. In search of an international multidimensional action plan for second victim support: a narrative review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09637-8.
citation: Mira JJ, Vicente MA, Lopez-Pineda A, Carrillo I, Guilabert M, Fernandez C, Perez-Jover V, Martin Delgado J, Perez-Perez P, Cobos Vargas A, Astier-Pena MP, Martinez-Garcia OB, Marco-Gomez B, Abad Bouzan C. Preventing and Addressing the Stress Reactions of Health Care Workers Caring for Patients With COVID-19: Development of a Digital Platform (Be + Against COVID). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 5;8(10):e21692. doi: 10.2196/21692.
citation: Venegas CL, Nkangu MN, Duffy MC, Fergusson DA, Spilg EG. Interventions to improve resilience in physicians who have completed training: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210512. eCollection 2019.
citation: Stoliker BE, Vaughan AD, Collins J, Black M, Anderson GS. Building Personal Resilience following an Online Resilience Training Program for BScN Students. West J Nurs Res. 2022 Aug;44(8):755-764. doi: 10.1177/01939459211017240. Epub 2021 May 17.
citation: Strametz R, Raspe M, Ettl B, Huf W, Pitz A. [Recommended actions: Reinforcing clinicians' resilience and supporting second victims during the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain capacity in the healthcare system]. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Ergon. 2020;70(6):264-268. doi: 10.1007/s40664-020-00405-7. Epub 2020 Sep 2. German.
citation: Raetze S, Duchek S, Maynard MT, Wohlgemuth M. Resilience in organization-related research: An integrative conceptual review across disciplines and levels of analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jun;107(6):867-897. doi: 10.1037/apl0000952. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
citation: Daly LM. Resilience: An Integrated Review. Nurs Sci Q. 2020 Oct;33(4):330-338. doi: 10.1177/0894318420943141.
citation: Winwood PC, Colon R, McEwen K. A practical measure of workplace resilience: developing the resilience at work scale. J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Oct;55(10):1205-12. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a2a60a.
citation: Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
citation: Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78.
citation: Bartone PT, Ursano RJ, Wright KM, Ingraham LH. The impact of a military air disaster on the health of assistance workers. A prospective study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1989 Jun;177(6):317-28. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198906000-00001.
citation: Wiig S, Aase K, Billett S, Canfield C, Roise O, Nja O, Guise V, Haraldseid-Driftland C, Ree E, Anderson JE, Macrae C; RiH-team. Defining the boundaries and operational concepts of resilience in the resilience in healthcare research program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05224-3.
citation: Sisto A, Vicinanza F, Campanozzi LL, Ricci G, Tartaglini D, Tambone V. Towards a Transversal Definition of Psychological Resilience: A Literature Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Nov 16;55(11):745. doi: 10.3390/medicina55110745.
citation: Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
citation: Schwappach DL, Boluarte TA. The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organisational accountability. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Jan 10;139(1-2):9-15. doi: 10.4414/smw.2009.12417.
citation: Bourne T, Shah H, Falconieri N, Timmerman D, Lees C, Wright A, Lumsden MA, Regan L, Van Calster B. Burnout, well-being and defensive medical practice among obstetricians and gynaecologists in the UK: cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e030968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030968.
citation: Schiess C, Schwappach D, Schwendimann R, Vanhaecht K, Burgstaller M, Senn B. A Transactional "Second-Victim" Model-Experiences of Affected Healthcare Professionals in Acute-Somatic Inpatient Settings: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1001-e1018. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000461.
citation: Sovold LE, Naslund JA, Kousoulis AA, Saxena S, Qoronfleh MW, Grobler C, Munter L. Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority. Front Public Health. 2021 May 7;9:679397. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679397. eCollection 2021.
citation: Jacobs B, McGovern J, Heinmiller J, Drenkard K. Engaging Employees in Well-Being: Moving From the Triple Aim to the Quadruple Aim. Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jul/Sep;42(3):231-245. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000303.