Clinical trial NCT04727866: Brain Plus Spinal Stimulation for Cervical SCI
Official title: Motor Cortex Plus Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Spinal Cord Injuries
Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis
Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation
spinal direct current stimulation
Lead sponsor: Bronx VA Medical Center
Sponsor class: FED
Collaborators: name: New York State Department of Health
First posted: 2021-01-27
Enrollment: 24
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 75
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The goal of this project is to strengthen residual corticospinal tract (CST) connections after partial injury using combined motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation to improve arm and hand function after spinal cord injury (SCI).

To do this, the investigators will test the combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in individuals with chronic cervical SCI.

Detailed description: For people with cervical SCI, regaining hand function is their highest priority. Most SCIs are motor incomplete, and even when complete, there is often significant amounts of spared spinal cord white matter. The goal of this project is to strengthen residual corticospinal tract (CST) connections after partial injury using combined motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation to improve arm and hand function.

The team's research in rats, which has been refined in over a decade of study, demonstrates that brain and spinal cord stimulation fully restores motor skills in rats after CST injury. Most significant for the population of people living with SCI, this approach is effective in the chronic phase of injury.

Recently, the investigators translated this electrical stimulation protocol into one that can be rapidly translated into people using non-invasive techniques. In rats, combined electrical intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of motor cortex with transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) activates the cervical spinal cord. This protocol, which is administered only 30 minutes a day for 10 days, causes large-scale sprouting of CST connections and full recovery of forelimb function. Thus, by combining brain and spinal cord electrical stimulation in rodents with corticospinal system injury durable CST axonal sprouting, strengthening of CST connections, and recovery is achieved.

In this proposal, the investigators intend to bring this promising therapeutic approach to humans with cervical SCI. The team will study people with chronic, motor incomplete, SCI to test the safety and feasibility of this approach. The investigators' approach is non-invasive and, if shown to be effective, can be rapidly integrated into current clinical practice to help restore hand function in people with chronic SCI.

Each subject will undergo four stimulation sessions of 4 hours or less. Outcomes focus on safety and neurophysiological transmission. The first session is used to determine the target muscle, optimal scalp site for TMS stimulation, assess cervical tsDCS tolerability, and measure maximal contraction force of the fingers, wrist, and elbow. The second through fourth sessions will assess the acute tolerability and effects of tsDCS with different intensities and electrode configurations in a randomized order. Each session will test a different electrode configuration and will be divided into two stages. The first stage will randomly deliver three 5-minute blocks of tsDCS at different randomized intensities (100%, 66% and 0% (sham) of tolerated intensity, as determined in Session 1) and assess changes in corticospinal and spinal excitability in response to TMS and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the target muscle. The second stage will assess the acute effects of 20-minutes of tsDCS delivered at two thirds the maximal tolerability on TMS- and PNS-evoked responses and performance of a motor task. Safety and tolerability will be closely monitored at all times.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Able-bodied participants

1. Age between 18 and 75 years;
2. No known central or peripheral neurological disease or injury.

SCI participants

1. Age between 18 and 75 years;
2. Chronic (\> 12 months) SCI between neurological levels C1-C8;
3. Score of 2, 3, or 4 (out of 5) on manual muscle testing of elbow flexion, wrist extension, wrist flexion, finger extension, finger flexion, or finger abduction in left or right hand;

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Multiple spinal cord lesions;
2. History of seizures;
3. Ventilator dependence or patent tracheostomy site;
4. Use of medications that significantly lower seizure threshold, such as amphetamines, neuroleptics, dalfampridine, and bupropion;
5. History of stroke, brain tumor, or brain abscess;
6. History of moderate or severe head trauma (loss of consciousness for greater than one hour or evidence of brain contusion or hemorrhage or depressed skull fracture on prior imaging);
7. History of implanted brain/spine/nerve stimulators, aneurysm clips, ferromagnetic metallic implants, or cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator;
8. Significant coronary artery or cardiac conduction disease;
9. Recent history (within past 6 months) of recurrent autonomic dysreflexia, defined as a syndrome of sudden rise in systolic pressure greater than 20 mm Hg or diastolic pressure greater than 10 mm Hg, without rise in heart rate, accompanied by symptoms such as headache, facial flushing, sweating, nasal congestion, and blurry vision (this will be closely monitored during all screening and testing procedures);
10. History of bipolar disorder;
11. History of suicide attempt;
12. Active psychosis;
13. Heavy alcohol consumption (greater than equivalent of 5 oz of liquor) within previous 48 hours;
14. Open skin lesions over the face, neck, shoulders, or arms;
15. Pregnancy;
16. Unsuitable for study participation as determined by study physician.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes
timeFrame: Change immediately after procedure
Secondary outcomes:
measure: H-reflex amplitudes
timeFrame: Change immediately after procedure
measure: Muscle dynamometry
timeFrame: Change immediately after procedure
measure: Intracortical inhibition and facilitation
timeFrame: Change immediately after procedure
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Bronx
country: United States
facility: James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
state: New York
Study officials:
affiliation: James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
name: Noam Y Harel, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: