Clinical trial NCT04729270: Treatment of Neck Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Official title: Treatment of Neck Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Cervical Syndrome
Keywords: Neck Pain
Physical Therapy Modalities
Manual Therapy
massage
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Lead sponsor: University of Cadiz
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-01-28
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 60
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL WITH BLIND EVALUATION BY THIRD PARTIES, LONGITUDINAL AND PROSPECTIVE.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study aim to investigate the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for improving pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of motion,Neck Disability Index, the multidimensional health related quality of life (SF-12) and the multidimensional health related quality of life and pain in patients with mechanical neck pain (NP).

Detailed description: Fifty-four participants with NP will randomly allocated to either an Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ten sessions) or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) (ten sessions) during two weeks. . Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index ( NDI), range of motion and (CROM), Questionnaire SF-12 and PPTs in sub-occipital and upper trapezius muscles were measured at baseline, at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up. T-tests and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (RM-MANOVA) were used for VAS, CROM and PPTs, respectively.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients of both sexes,
* Aged between 18 and 60 years, in an
* Active state of pain and diagnosed with a month of evolution.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients who are pregnant, have pacemaker and those Surgically operated cervical spine - Patients who have been treated with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation a month earlier.

Primary outcomes:
measure: The intensity of cervical pain
timeFrame: Baseline
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The intensity of cervical pain
timeFrame: Four weeks
measure: The intensity of cervical pain
timeFrame: Twelve weeks
measure: Active cervical range of motion
timeFrame: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
measure: Pressure pain thresholds in cervical trigger points
timeFrame: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
measure: Neck Disability Index (NDI).
timeFrame: Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cadiz
country: Spain
facility: Policlínica Santa María
state: Cádiz
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Cádiz
name: manuel Rodríguez Huguet, Physiotherapy
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Whiteford CM, Steinbeck L, Dommerholt J. On "Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy Assessment and Treatment in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain," Bier JD, Scholten-Peeters WGM, Staal JB, et al. Phys Ther. 2018;98:162-171. Phys Ther. 2018 Sep 1;98(9):819-820. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy078. No abstract available.
citation: Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.
citation: Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017 Aug 14;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221.
citation: Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
citation: Cote P, Yu H, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Wong JJ, Mior S, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, Southerst D, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1051-1070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1374. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
citation: Fitzgibbon BM, Schabrun SM. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain Disorders: Challenges and New Frontiers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Oct;106(4):717-719. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1544. Epub 2019 Jul 15. No abstract available.
citation: Yalinay Dikmen P, Yavuz BG, Aydinlar EI. The relationships between migraine, depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbances. Acta Neurol Belg. 2015 Jun;115(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0312-0. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
citation: Schwartz DP, Robbins MS. Primary headache disorders and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Eye Brain. 2012 Sep 13;4:49-61. doi: 10.2147/EB.S21841. eCollection 2012.
citation: Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0618.
citation: Martelletti P, Jensen RH, Antal A, Arcioni R, Brighina F, de Tommaso M, Franzini A, Fontaine D, Heiland M, Jurgens TP, Leone M, Magis D, Paemeleire K, Palmisani S, Paulus W, May A; European Headache Federation. Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain. 2013 Oct 21;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-86.
citation: Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
citation: Caulfield KA, Badran BW, DeVries WH, Summers PM, Kofmehl E, Li X, Borckardt JJ, Bikson M, George MS. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):961-969. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
citation: DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, Toback RL, Datta A, Bikson M. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat. 2015 Jul 15;9:89. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00089. eCollection 2015.
citation: Auvichayapat P, Janyacharoen T, Rotenberg A, Tiamkao S, Krisanaprakornkit T, Sinawat S, Punjaruk W, Thinkhamrop B, Auvichayapat N. Migraine prophylaxis by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1003-12.
citation: Straudi S, Buja S, Baroni A, Pavarelli C, Pranovi G, Fregni F, Basaglia N. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with group exercise treatment in subjects with chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Oct;32(10):1348-1356. doi: 10.1177/0269215518777881. Epub 2018 May 21.
citation: Andrade SM, de Brito Aranha REL, de Oliveira EA, de Mendonca CTPL, Martins WKN, Alves NT, Fernandez-Calvo B. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor vs prefrontal cortex in refractory chronic migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2017 Jul 15;378:225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 3.
citation: Przeklasa-Muszynska A, Kocot-Kepska M, Dobrogowski J, Wiatr M, Mika J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its influence on analgesics effectiveness in patients suffering from migraine headache. Pharmacol Rep. 2017 Aug;69(4):714-721. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Mar 1.