Clinical trial NCT02000349: Comparison of Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers and Fresh Embryo Transfers With Whole Chromosome Analysis Using Next Generation Sequencing
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Infertility
Keywords: infertility
next generation sequencing
Lead sponsor: Reprogenetics
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
Collaborators: name: Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
First posted: 2013-12-04
Enrollment: 186
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 42
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: SCREENING

Brief summary: The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a frozen-thawed embryo transfer and a fresh embryo transfer on pregnancy and implantation rates; with the added benefit of a blastocyst biopsy and whole chromosome analysis by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).

Detailed description: 1. Fresh group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (\*) biopsied on day 5, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo transferred on day 6, in the am. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (\*). Any morulas developing to hatching blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.
2. Frozen group: All embryos will be hatched on day 3. Patients will have hatching blastocysts (\*) biopsied on day 5 or day 6, embryos will then be vitrified, analyzed by NGS, and will have one or two euploid embryo(s) thawed and transferred on a FET cycle, before noon. If more than two euploid blastocysts are available the one(s) to be transferred will be selected based on morphology (\*).

(\*) Hatching blastocysts as described by Gardner and Schoolcraft (1999):

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria (pre-stimulation):

* Age up to 42 years

Exclusion Criteria (pre-stimulation):

* MESA and TESE patients
* At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal abnormality
* Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable)
* Gender selection cycles
* Thaw cycles
* Any patient who cannot have a fresh embryo transfer
* FSH above 12 or AMH less than 1

Primary outcomes:
measure: Implantation rate
timeFrame: 8 weeks after replacement
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Correlation of Mitochondrial DNA and implantation
timeFrame: When a fetal heartbeat is detected (8 weeks after implantation)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Portland
country: United States
facility: Reproductive Medicine Lab, LLC
state: Oregon
Study officials:
affiliation: Reprogenetics
name: Santiago Munne, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(6):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
citation: Cohen J, DeVane GW, Elsner CW, Kort HI, Massey JB, Norbury SE. Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinologic factors in the replacement cycle. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jul;50(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60009-2.
citation: Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1516. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
citation: De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):2988-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep251. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
citation: Sagoskin AW, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Richter KS, Widra EA. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1498. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
citation: Fragouli E, Spath K, Alfarawati S, Wells D (2013) Quantification of mitochondrial DNA predicts the implantation potential of chromosomally normal embryos. Fertil Steril, in press (ASRM abstract)
citation: Gardner DK and Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D. eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Carnforth, Parthenon Publishin, 1999, 378-88
citation: Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
citation: Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munne S. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
citation: Munne S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):408-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.091. Epub 2009 May 5.
citation: SART (2011): https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
citation: Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.
citation: Coates A, Kung A, Mounts E, Hesla J, Bankowski B, Barbieri E, Ata B, Cohen J, Munne S. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):723-730.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 27.