Clinical trial NCT06630715: Efficacy Of Upadacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis And Comparison To Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Official title: Efficacy Of Upadacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis And Comparison To Rheumatoid Arthritis. OPTimising IMAging For The Use In The Follow-Up Of Arthritis: The OPTIMA Study
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Conditions: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA
Keywords: rheumathoid Arthritis
Psoriatic Arthritis
Ultrasound
MRI
Upadacitinib
Dactylitis
Enthesitis
Synovitis
sacroiliitis
Lead sponsor: I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-10-08
Enrollment: 178
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients with active Psoriatic Arthritis and patients with active Rheumatoid Arthritis who will start therapy with upadacitinib

Brief summary: The general objective of the OPTIMA study is to assess the time course and interrelationship of imaging (ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging), clinical, laboratory, and Patient Reported Outcome variables in patients with active Psoriatic Arthritis (any subset) and Rheumatoid Arthritis starting therapy with a Jak-Inhibitor (Upadacitinib), during the first 6 months of follow-up.

Participants will be evaluated at the start of therapy with upadacitinib and during the follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment initiation. At each visit (with the exception of the 2-weeks visit), data relating to the clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and ultrasound of the affected joints will be collected according to standard clinical practice; questionnaires on disease activity will also be completed. In the case of axial involvement, a magnetic resonance imaging will be performed at baseline and after 6 months of therapy, only if required by the standard of care.

Detailed description: This is a multicentric prospective observational study in which consecutive patients diagnosed with Psoriatic Arthritis (any subset) and Rheumatoid Arthritis, that according to clinicians' evaluation should be treated with Upadacitinib therapy, will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Rheumatology Department of the centers included in the study.

The investigators will enroll consecutive patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis with active disease and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, from the outpatient clinic of the Rheumatology Units of the participating centers. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to the beginning of the study. All patients, in line with clinical routine practice, will undergo a standard clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessment in order to define the disease activity according to standardized disease activity indexes, at baseline and during the first 3 follow-up visits. For patients starting new treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis, the follow-up visits are generally scheduled after 1 month (± 1 week), 3 months (± 2 weeks), and 6 months (± 4 weeks) post-treatment initiation, in accordance with international guidelines and local protocols. In case of suspicion of axial involvement, an MRI of the sacroiliac joints will be performed at baseline and, in case of positivity, will be repeated after 6 months (±1 month) in order to assess disease activity at the spine and the treatment efficacy. Regarding the Patient Reported Outcome, the investigators will assess these during the scheduled visits, and two weeks after the initiation of treatment to evaluate earlier pain and functional improvement. The Patient Reported Outcome assessment at two weeks will be administered in a paper form to participants during the baseline visit, and subsequently participants will return these during the first follow-up visit. The data for the study will be retrieved from the medical records of participants and recorded into an appositely created electronic case report form.

Eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis patients are:

1. Patients diagnosed with peripheral Psoriatic Arthritis according to the CASPAR criteria or with axial Psoriatic Arthritis according to ASAS criteria and with at least one of the following:

   1. With active peripheral Psoriatic Arthritis regarding ongoing therapy in one of the following sites: MCP joints 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of hands 1-5, distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints of hands 2-5, wrists, elbows, knees and ankles/heels and feet, according to any of the following criteria:

      I) DAPSA ≥ 15 and joint inflammation according to the Global OMERACT-EULAR US scoring for synovitis and power Doppler (GLOESS) with a grade at patient level \&gt;3,2

      II) With a clinical enthesitis and an active enthesitis (positive power Doppler of any grade), in the clinical symptomatic site, according to the OMERACT US definitions

      III) With active dactylitis (clinical diagnosis made by the physician at the time of baseline visit) and a positive US dactylitis according to the DACTylitis glObal Sonographic (DACTOS) score \&gt;3

      IV) DAPSA ≥ 15 and tenosynovitis according to the OMERACT US scoring system for tenosynovitis with a grade \&gt;1
   2. With active axial PsA regarding ongoing therapy (ASDAS ≥ 2.1) and active sacroiliitis according to the ASAS MRI definitions
2. Who are eligible according to the current guidelines/regulations to start treatment with UPA and present a favorable risk/benefit profile according to the clinician's opinion for such treatment.
3. Aged older than 18 years.
4. Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

The inclusion criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis patients are:

1. Patients diagnosed with RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria
2. With active Rheumatoid Arthritis according to the following criteria: DAS28-PCR \&gt;3.2, and the presence of at least one US finding of the following:

   1. Joint inflammation at hands and wrists according to the Global OMERACT-EULAR (GLOESS) US scoring for synovitis and power Doppler with a grade at patient level \&gt;2
   2. One tenosynovitis at hands or wrists, according to the OMERACT US scoring system for tenosynovitis with a grade \&gt;1
3. Who are eligible according to the current guidelines/regulations to start treatment with Upadacitinib and present a favourable risk/benefit profile according to the clinician's opinion for such treatment.
4. Aged older than 18 years.
5. Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with any contraindication to Upadacitinib:

   1. women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
   2. active infection
   3. evidence of tuberculosis infection
   4. known infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B or C
   5. patients who have current malignancy or history of malignancy in the last 5 years
   6. high cardiovascular risk
   7. high risk of venous thromboembolism
   8. patients with severe hepatic impairment
2. Patients with associated fibromyalgia syndrome according to the 2016 ACR diagnostic criteria
3. Unable to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Difference between US synovitis score
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Difference between US dactylitis score
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between US tenosynovitis score
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between US enthesitis score
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between US peritendonitis score
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between SPARCC MRI index
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between T2 mapping scores
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between SJC66
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between TJC68
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between the SPARCC score
timeFrame: from baseline to and 24 weeks
measure: Difference between the dactylitis count
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Prevalence of BSA = 0
timeFrame: after 24 weeks
measure: Difference between CRP levels
timeFrame: from baseline to and 24 weeks
measure: Difference between HAQ score
timeFrame: from baseline to and 24 weeks
measure: Difference between Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS
timeFrame: from baseline to and 24 weeks
measure: Difference between VAS pain
timeFrame: from baseline to and 24 weeks
measure: Difference between GH-VAS
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Difference between ASDAS levels
timeFrame: from baseline to 24 weeks
measure: Prevalence of MDA
timeFrame: at 24 weeks
measure: Difference between DAS28 levels
timeFrame: baseline and 24 weeks
measure: Time to remission
timeFrame: up to 2 weeks
measure: Adverse events
timeFrame: from baseline and 24 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: LegNano
country: Italy
facility: Ospedale Civile di Legnano
state: Milano
city: Rozzano
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS Ospedale Humanitas
state: Milano
city: San Donato
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
state: Milano
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio,
state: Mi
city: Monza
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS San Gerardo
state: Monza E Brianza
city: Bergamo
country: Italy
facility: ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
city: Brescia
country: Italy
facility: ASST Spedali Civili
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: ASST Gaetano Pini CTO
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
city: Milano
country: Italy
facility: ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco Ospedale Luigi Sacco
city: Pavia
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
city: Pavia
country: Italy
facility: IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
city: Varese
country: Italy
facility: ASST Settelaghi - Ospedale di Circolo di Varese
Study officials:
affiliation: Università degli Studi di Milano / IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
name: Georgios Filippou, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Albano D, Bignone R, Chianca V, Cuocolo R, Messina C, Sconfienza LM, Ciccia F, Brunetti A, Midiri M, Galia M. T2 mapping of the sacroiliac joints in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109246. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
citation: Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, Dhillon SS, Williams M, Stone M, Conner-Spady B, Palsat J, Lambert RG. Spondyloarthritis research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct 15;53(5):703-9. doi: 10.1002/art.21445.
citation: Lambert RG, Bakker PA, van der Heijde D, Weber U, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KG, Sieper J, Baraliakos X, Bennett A, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Dougados M, Pedersen SJ, Jurik AG, Maksymowych WP, Marzo-Ortega H, Ostergaard M, Poddubnyy D, Reijnierse M, van den Bosch F, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Landewe R. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Nov;75(11):1958-1963. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208642. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
citation: Sudol-Szopinska I, Jurik AG, Eshed I, Lennart J, Grainger A, Ostergaard M, Klauser A, Cotten A, Wick MC, Maas M, Miese F, Egund N, Boutry N, Rupreht M, Reijnierse M, Oei EH, Meier R, O'Connor P, Feydy A, Mascarenhas V, Plagou A, Simoni P, Platzgummer H, Rennie WJ, Mester A, Teh J, Robinson P, Guglielmi G, Astrom G, Schueller-Weiderkamm C. Recommendations of the ESSR Arthritis Subcommittee for the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Musculoskeletal Rheumatic Diseases. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015 Sep;19(4):396-411. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564696. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
citation: Torp-Pedersen S, Christensen R, Szkudlarek M, Ellegaard K, D'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Balint P, Wakefield RJ, Torp-Pedersen A, Terslev L. Power and color Doppler ultrasound settings for inflammatory flow: impact on scoring of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):386-95. doi: 10.1002/art.38940.
citation: Moller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Bong DA, Martinoli C, Filippucci E, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Damjanov N, Hammer HB, Sudol-Szopinska I, Grassi W, Balint P, Bruyn GAW, D'Agostino MA, Hollander D, Siddle HJ, Supp G, Schmidt WA, Iagnocco A, Koski J, Kane D, Fodor D, Bruns A, Mandl P, Kaeley GS, Micu M, Ho C, Vlad V, Chavez-Lopez M, Filippou G, Ceron CE, Nestorova R, Quintero M, Wakefield R, Carmona L, Naredo E. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1974-1979. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
citation: Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Salaffi F, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Differential diagnosis between rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: the value of ultrasound findings at metacarpophalangeal joints level. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):1111-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.147272. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
citation: Moon SJ, Lee WY, Hwang JS, Hong YP, Morisky DE. Accuracy of a screening tool for medication adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187139. eCollection 2017.
citation: Horta-Baas G. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Key Consideration for Evaluating Biosimilar Uptake? Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Mar 30;13:79-95. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256715. eCollection 2022.
citation: Oji V, Luger TA. The skin in psoriasis: assessment and challenges. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;33(5 Suppl 93):S14-9. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
citation: Maksymowych WP, Mallon C, Morrow S, Shojania K, Olszynski WP, Wong RL, Sampalis J, Conner-Spady B. Development and validation of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):948-53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.084244. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
citation: Duarte-Garcia A, Leung YY, Coates LC, Beaton D, Christensen R, Craig ET, de Wit M, Eder L, Fallon L, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, Goel N, Holland R, Lindsay C, Maxwell L, Mease P, Orbai AM, Shea B, Strand V, Veale DJ, Tillett W, Ogdie A. Endorsement of the 66/68 Joint Count for the Measurement of Musculoskeletal Disease Activity: OMERACT 2018 Psoriatic Arthritis Workshop Report. J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):996-1005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181089. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
citation: Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A, Ortolan A, Webers C, Baraliakos X, Landewe RBM, Van den Bosch FE, Boteva B, Bremander A, Carron P, Ciurea A, van Gaalen FA, Geher P, Gensler L, Hermann J, de Hooge M, Husakova M, Kiltz U, Lopez-Medina C, Machado PM, Marzo-Ortega H, Molto A, Navarro-Compan V, Nissen MJ, Pimentel-Santos FM, Poddubnyy D, Proft F, Rudwaleit M, Telkman M, Zhao SS, Ziade N, van der Heijde D. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):19-34. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223296. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
citation: Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Aletaha D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Hyrich KL, Pope JE, de Souza S, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Verschueren P, Winthrop KL, Balsa A, Bathon JM, Buch MH, Burmester GR, Buttgereit F, Cardiel MH, Chatzidionysiou K, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, den Broeder AA, El Aoufy K, Finckh A, Fonseca JE, Gottenberg JE, Haavardsholm EA, Iagnocco A, Lauper K, Li Z, McInnes IB, Mysler EF, Nash P, Poor G, Ristic GG, Rivellese F, Rubbert-Roth A, Schulze-Koops H, Stoilov N, Strangfeld A, van der Helm-van Mil A, van Duuren E, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jan;82(1):3-18. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
citation: Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Hauser W, Katz RL, Mease PJ, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Walitt B. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
citation: SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2455-2467. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab312.
citation: SCORE2 working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2439-2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309.
citation: Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jan;38(1):44-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107.
citation: Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, Birnbaum NS, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Cohen MD, Combe B, Costenbader KH, Dougados M, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Hazes JM, Hobbs K, Huizinga TW, Kavanaugh A, Kay J, Kvien TK, Laing T, Mease P, Menard HA, Moreland LW, Naden RL, Pincus T, Smolen JS, Stanislawska-Biernat E, Symmons D, Tak PP, Upchurch KS, Vencovsky J, Wolfe F, Hawker G. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81. doi: 10.1002/art.27584.
citation: Machado PM, Landewe R, Heijde DV; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;77(10):1539-1540. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213184. Epub 2018 Feb 16. No abstract available.
citation: Naredo E, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Moller I, Balint PV, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Karim Z, Terslev L, Bong DA, Garrido J, Martinez-Hernandez D, Bruyn GA; OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force*. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1328-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
citation: Zabotti A, Sakellariou G, Tinazzi I, Idolazzi L, Batticciotto A, Canzoni M, Carrara G, De Lucia O, Figus F, Girolimetto N, Macchioni P, McConnell R, Possemato N, Iagnocco A. Novel and reliable DACTylitis glObal Sonographic (DACTOS) score in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Aug;79(8):1037-1043. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217191. Epub 2020 May 19.
citation: Balint PV, Terslev L, Aegerter P, Bruyn GAW, Chary-Valckenaere I, Gandjbakhch F, Iagnocco A, Jousse-Joulin S, Moller I, Naredo E, Schmidt WA, Wakefield RJ, D'Agostino MA; OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force members. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound definition and scoring for enthesitis in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: an OMERACT US initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Dec;77(12):1730-1735. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213609. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
citation: D'Agostino MA, Terslev L, Aegerter P, Backhaus M, Balint P, Bruyn GA, Filippucci E, Grassi W, Iagnocco A, Jousse-Joulin S, Kane D, Naredo E, Schmidt W, Szkudlarek M, Conaghan PG, Wakefield RJ. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 1: definition and development of a standardised, consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open. 2017 Jul 11;3(1):e000428. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000428. eCollection 2017.
citation: Schoels MM, Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 May;75(5):811-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207507. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
citation: Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Braun J, Chou CT, Collantes-Estevez E, Dougados M, Huang F, Gu J, Khan MA, Kirazli Y, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Sorensen IJ, Ozgocmen S, Roussou E, Valle-Onate R, Weber U, Wei J, Sieper J. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
citation: Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H; CASPAR Study Group. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73. doi: 10.1002/art.21972.
citation: Mease P, Setty A, Papp K, Van den Bosch F, Tsuji S, Keiserman M, Carter K, Li Y, McCaskill R, McDearmon-Blondell E, Wung P, Tillett W. Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to biologics: 3-year results from the open-label extension of the randomised controlled phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2286-2297. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/8l7bbk. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
citation: McInnes IB, Kato K, Magrey M, Merola JF, Kishimoto M, Haaland D, Chen L, Duan Y, Liu J, Lippe R, Wung P. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from the Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):275-292. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00499-w. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
citation: Coates LC, Garrood T, Gullick N, Helliwell P, Kent T, Marks J, Tillett W, Kaur-Papadakis D, Tahir H, van Haaren S, McInnes I. Upadacitinib response rates in patients with psoriatic arthritis enrolled in the SELECT-PsA-1 and SELECT-PsA-2 trials assessed according to modified PsARC. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Dec 23;62(1):e1-e3. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac388. No abstract available.
citation: Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Bessette L, Peterfy CG, Durez P, Tanaka Y, Swierkot J, Khan N, Bu X, Li Y, Song IH. Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results through 3 years from the SELECT-COMPARE study. RMD Open. 2022 Feb;8(1):e002012. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002012.
citation: McInnes IB, Anderson JK, Magrey M, Merola JF, Liu Y, Kishimoto M, Jeka S, Pacheco-Tena C, Wang X, Chen L, Zueger P, Liu J, Pangan AL, Behrens F. Trial of Upadacitinib and Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1;384(13):1227-1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022516.
citation: Coates LC, Corp N, van der Windt DA, O'Sullivan D, Soriano ER, Kavanaugh A. GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations: 2021 Update. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6 Suppl 1):52-54. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.211331. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
citation: Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, de Wit M, McInnes I, Dougados M, Primdahl J, McGonagle DG, Aletaha D, Balanescu A, Balint PV, Bertheussen H, Boehncke WH, Burmester GR, Canete JD, Damjanov NS, Kragstrup TW, Kvien TK, Landewe RBM, Lories RJU, Marzo-Ortega H, Poddubnyy D, Rodrigues Manica SA, Schett G, Veale DJ, Van den Bosch FE, van der Heijde D, Smolen JS. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-712. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
citation: Celis R, Cuervo A, Ramirez J, Canete JD. Psoriatic Synovitis: Singularity and Potential Clinical Implications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 11;6:14. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00014. eCollection 2019.
citation: McGonagle D, Lories RJ, Tan AL, Benjamin M. The concept of a "synovio-entheseal complex" and its implications for understanding joint inflammation and damage in psoriatic arthritis and beyond. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug;56(8):2482-91. doi: 10.1002/art.22758. No abstract available.