Clinical trial NCT04609917: Difficult Cannulation Criteria in Trainee Involved ERCP Cannulation
Official title: Proposal of Difficult Cannulation Criteria in Trainee Involved ERCP Cannulation Procedure
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Biliary Cannulation
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Keywords: ERCP
Difficult cannulation
Trainee
PEP
Lead sponsor: Air Force Military Medical University, China
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-10-30
Enrollment: 4415
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP in Xijing Hospital in China

Brief summary: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most technically challenging procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selective deep cannulation is a critical step for the performance of ERCP. The incidence of difficult cannulation has been reported in many studies, ranging from 10% to 40% in patients with native papilla. Difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).

The definition of difficult cannulation has been proposed by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Initial cannulation is considered difficult with the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 min for attempting to cannulate; more than 5 contacts with the papilla; more than 1 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification. The clear definition of difficult cannulation is important for making decisions during or after ERCP, including determining the appropriate time to transfer to advanced cannulation techniques (e.g. early precut) and whether prophylactic methods should be administrated to reduce the risk of PEP. Although 5-5-1 criteria have been widely used during ERCP practice or in relevant studies, it remains unclear whether the current criteria are suitable for the cannulation procedure with trainee involvement. Because of inexperienced manipulation of the scope and accessories, the involvement of trainees generally increases the overall cannulation time and attempts, which are the two important parameters in the criteria of difficult cannulation. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that the definition of difficult cannulation in trainee-involved cannulation might be different from the traditional 5-5-1 criteria.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* patients with native papilla

Exclusion Criteria:

* indications of major or minor pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation; no attempts of cannulation due to inaccessible papilla; cannulation via the papillary fistula; patients with duodenal stenosis or anatomical deformity secondary to prior surgery.

Primary outcomes:
measure: rates of difficult cannulation
timeFrame: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes:
measure: incidences of PEP
timeFrame: 48 hours
measure: overall adverse events
timeFrame: 48 hours
measure: the proportion of advanced cannulation methods
timeFrame: 4 hours
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Xi'an
country: China
facility: Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
state: Shaanxi
Study officials:
References:
citation: Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
citation: Ismail S, Udd M, Lindstrom O, Rainio M, Halttunen J, Kylanpaa L. Criteria for difficult biliary cannulation: start to count. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;31(10):1200-1205. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001515.
citation: Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L, Arnelo U, Gronroos J, Hauge T, Kleveland PM, Nordblad Schmidt P, Saarela A, Swahn F, Toth E, Mustonen H, Lohr JM. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):752-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.894120. Epub 2014 Mar 14.