Clinical trial NCT01313052: Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery
Official title: Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Psychotic Disorders
Keywords: Psychotic
Criminal
Lead sponsor: University of Rochester
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
First posted: 2011-03-11
Enrollment: 53
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, homelessness, perceived coercion, and consumer satisfaction. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

Detailed description: FACT (Forensic Assertive Community Treatment) is an adaptation of the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model that addresses a significant gap in our service delivery systems by targeting the interface between mental health and criminal justice services. ACT was originally developed to engage severely mentally ill adults in outpatient psychiatric treatment through the use of assertive outreach and comprehensive services. FACT adds legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring to ACT, which is comprehensive, high intensity, mobile, psychiatric treatment.

The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, and homelessness. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Individuals diagnosed with any psychotic disorder such as Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features, Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features, and Psychotic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.
* Individuals currently facing misdemeanor or violation charges who have not yet been sentenced.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Individuals do not have or cannot be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.
* Individuals currently facing felony charges
* Individuals currently involved in any type of legal leverage including probation, parole, drug or mental health court supervision, Assisted Outpatient Treatment, or Criminal Procedure Law status.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Jail Recidivism
timeFrame: For the one year subjects are in the study.
measure: Mental Health Service Utilization
timeFrame: For the one year subjects are in the study.
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Rochester
country: United States
facility: Monroe County Jail
state: New York
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Rochester
name: J Steven Lamberti, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Lamberti JS, Deem A, Weisman RL, LaDuke C. The role of probation in forensic assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):418-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0418.
citation: Lamberti, J., & Weisman, R. (2010). Forensic assertive community treatment: Origins, current practice, and future directions. In H. Dlugacz (Ed.), Reentry Planning for Offenders With Mental Disorders (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 145-169). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
citation: Lamberti, JS. (2011). Legal Leverage in the Treatment of Adults With Severe Mental Illness, in Workplace Violence in Mental Health and General Health Care Settings. Pages 225 - 236. M. Privitera, editor. Jones and Bartlett, Pages 225-236.