Clinical trial NCT05171166: Neoadjuvant HAIC of TACE Plus Donafenib in BCLC B Stage HCC: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.
Official title: Neoadjuvant HAIC of TACE Plus Donafenib in BCLC B Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Out Up-to-seven: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE2
PHASE3
Conditions: Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Lead sponsor: Peking University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-12-28
Enrollment: 156
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 75
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy with HAIC-TACE and donafenib compared to TACE plus donafenib in patients with BCLC B stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) out of up-to-seven criteria.

Detailed description: Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used palliative treatment for BCLC B stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. While a number of studies demonstrated poor effect of TACE for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma especially for those with tumor that out of up-to-7 criteria. Some recent studies suggested that, compared with TACE, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve the survivals for HCC with large tumor. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the superiority of neoadjuvant HAIC of TACE.

Total 156 subjects will be recruited in this study, each group of 78 subjects in treatment group (HAIC-TACE-Dona group) and control group (TACE-Dona group). Primary efficacy analysis will be done in the full analysis set. PFS will be used as primary outcome measures. OS, TTP, ORR, DCR and safety will be the secondary endpoints. In addition, the safety evaluation will be carried out according to the standard of adverse reaction classification (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE v5.0).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects must volunteer to participate in the study, signed informed consent, and were able to comply with the program requirements of visits and related procedures.
2. Age and gender: \>18 years old and≤75 years old, both men and women.
3. All subjects must have Hepatocellular Carcinoma confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis.
4. Subjects are not suitable for radical resection or radical ablative therapy.
5. BCLC B based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, and the lesions in the liver exceed up to 7 criteria, the number of tumors + the maximum diameter of tumors \> 7.
6. Patients with viable and measurable target lesion per mRECIST.
7. Patients who are expected to live more than 3 months.
8. ECOG PS 0-1.
9. Child-Pugh class A.
10. Patients with laboratory values that meet the following criteria:

    1. Hemoglobin≥90 g/L;
    2. Neutrophile granulocytes≥1.5×109/L;
    3. Platelet count≥75×109/L;
    4. Albumin≥30 g/L;
    5. Total serum bilirubin ≤ 2 times upper limits of normal;
    6. AST and ALT ≤ 5 times upper limits of normal;
    7. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper limits of normal;
    8. Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limits of normal;
    9. Prothrombin time or international normalized ratio ≤ 1.5 times upper limits of normal, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ≤ 1.5×ULN;

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma confirmed by histology or cytology.
2. History of malignant tumor, excluding the following cases:

   1. Malignant tumor that was curatively treated more than 5 years prior to study entry and has not recurred since then;
   2. Successful radical resection of basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, superficial bladder carcinoma, preinvasive cervix carcinoma, and other preinvasive cancers.
3. Diffuse tumor lesion.
4. The lesions load in the liver exceeds 20, the number of tumors + the maximum diameter of tumors \> 20.
5. Vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis.
6. Preexisting or history of hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome or liver transplantation.
7. Clinically uncontrolled ascites or pleural effusion.
8. History of surgical excision or ablation within 4 weeks of the start of treatment.
9. History of hepatic arterial infusion, more than twice TACE therapy, or history of TACE within 6 months of the start of treatment.
10. History of systemic therapy, including but not limited to chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy.
11. History of thrombosis and/or embolism within 6 months of the start of treatment.
12. Clinically severe gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months of the start of treatment or any life-threatening bleeding events within 3 months of the start of treatment.
13. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, including, but not limited to, acute myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina or prior coronary artery bypass surgery, congestive heart failure (NYHA \>2), poorly controlled arrhythmias or arrhythmias requiring pacemaker therapy, hypertension not controlled by medication (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) within the past 6 months.
14. Other significant clinical and laboratory abnormalities, such as uncontrolled diabetes, chronic kidney disease, grade II or above peripheral neuropathy (CTCAE V5.0), and thyroid dysfunction, that may affect the safety evaluation.
15. Severe infections that are active or clinically poorly controlled.
16. If accompanied by acute or chronic active hepatitis B, unless taking antiviral drugs.
17. Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, possibly pregnant, or planning to become pregnant, and fertile female or male patient who is unwilling or unable to use effective contraception.
18. Multiple branches of hepatic artery with severe variation.
19. Any other subjects that the investigator considers ineligible.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Progression-free survival
timeFrame: From date of treatment beginning until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Overall Survival
timeFrame: From date of treatment beginning until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months.
measure: Time To Progression
timeFrame: Evaluation of tumor burden based on mRECIST criteria until first documented progress, assessed up to 100 months.
measure: Objective response rate
timeFrame: Evaluation of tumor burden based on mRECIST criteria through study completion, an average of once per 3 months.
measure: Disease control rate
timeFrame: Evaluation of tumor burden based on mRECIST criteria through study completion, an average of once per 3 months.
measure: Number of paitents with treatment-related adverse events
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average of once per 1 month.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Beijing
country: China
facility: Peking University Cancer Hospital
state: Beijing
Study officials:
affiliation: Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital
name: Xiaodong Wang, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, Lencioni R, Koike K, Zucman-Rossi J, Finn RS. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 21;7(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00240-3.
citation: Farsad K, Nabavizadeh N, Kardosh A, Jou JH, Naugler WE, Kolbeck KJ. Combined locoregional and systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: finally, the future is obscure. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1700. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4164. No abstract available.
citation: Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1301-1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
citation: Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002 May;35(5):1164-71. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156.
citation: Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.
citation: Kokudo N, Takemura N, Hasegawa K, Takayama T, Kubo S, Shimada M, Nagano H, Hatano E, Izumi N, Kaneko S, Kudo M, Iijima H, Genda T, Tateishi R, Torimura T, Igaki H, Kobayashi S, Sakurai H, Murakami T, Watadani T, Matsuyama Y. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2017 (4th JSH-HCC guidelines) 2019 update. Hepatol Res. 2019 Oct;49(10):1109-1113. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13411. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
citation: European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. No abstract available.
citation: Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):358-380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086. No abstract available.
citation: Wang Q, Xia D, Bai W, Wang E, Sun J, Huang M, Mu W, Yin G, Li H, Zhao H, Li J, Zhang C, Zhu X, Wu J, Li J, Gong W, Li Z, Lin Z, Pan X, Shi H, Shao G, Liu J, Yang S, Zheng Y, Xu J, Song J, Wang W, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Ding R, Zhang H, Yu H, Zheng L, Gu W, You N, Wang G, Zhang S, Feng L, Liu L, Zhang P, Li X, Chen J, Xu T, Zhou W, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Huang W, Jiang W, Zhang W, Shao W, Li L, Niu J, Yuan J, Li X, Lv Y, Li K, Yin Z, Xia J, Fan D, Han G; China HCC-TACE Study Group. Development of a prognostic score for recommended TACE candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicentre observational study. J Hepatol. 2019 May;70(5):893-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
citation: Wang Q, Xia D, Bai W, Wang E, Han G. Reply to: "The "six-and-twelve score" for TACE treatment: Does it really help us?". J Hepatol. 2019 Nov;71(5):1053-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Sep 26. No abstract available.
citation: Arizumi T, Minami T, Chishina H, Kono M, Takita M, Yada N, Hagiwara S, Minami Y, Ida H, Ueshima K, Kamata K, Minaga K, Komeda Y, Takenaka M, Sakurai T, Watanabe T, Nishida N, Kudo M. Time to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Refractoriness in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Kinki Criteria Stages B1 and B2. Dig Dis. 2017;35(6):589-597. doi: 10.1159/000480208. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
citation: Tsurusaki M, Murakami T. Surgical and Locoregional Therapy of HCC: TACE. Liver Cancer. 2015 Sep;4(3):165-75. doi: 10.1159/000367739. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
citation: Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Renzulli M, Cioni R, Bargellini I, Bartolozzi C, Breatta AD, Gandini G, Nani R, Gasparini D, Cucchetti A, Bolondi L, Trevisani F; PRECISION ITALIA STUDY GROUP. Randomised controlled trial of doxorubicin-eluting beads vs conventional chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;111(2):255-64. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.199. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
citation: Sacco R, Bargellini I, Bertini M, Bozzi E, Romano A, Petruzzi P, Tumino E, Ginanni B, Federici G, Cioni R, Metrangolo S, Bertoni M, Bresci G, Parisi G, Altomare E, Capria A, Bartolozzi C. Conventional versus doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Nov;22(11):1545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
citation: Angelico M. TACE vs DEB-TACE: Who wins? Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jul;48(7):796-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 17. No abstract available.
citation: Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.
citation: Kudo M, Ueshima K, Ikeda M, Torimura T, Tanabe N, Aikata H, Izumi N, Yamasaki T, Nojiri S, Hino K, Tsumura H, Kuzuya T, Isoda N, Yasui K, Aino H, Ido A, Kawabe N, Nakao K, Wada Y, Yokosuka O, Yoshimura K, Okusaka T, Furuse J, Kokudo N, Okita K, Johnson PJ, Arai Y; TACTICS study group. Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial. Gut. 2020 Aug;69(8):1492-1501. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318934. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
citation: Qu XD, Chen CS, Wang JH, Yan ZP, Chen JM, Gong GQ, Liu QX, Luo JJ, Liu LX, Liu R, Qian S. The efficacy of TACE combined sorafenib in advanced stages hepatocellullar carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2012 Jun 21;12:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-263.
citation: Wan X, Zhai X, Yan Z, Yang P, Li J, Wu D, Wang K, Xia Y, Shen F. Retrospective analysis of transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in Chinese patients with unresectable and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 13;7(50):83806-83816. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11514.
citation: Yao X, Yan D, Zeng H, Liu D, Li H. Concurrent sorafenib therapy extends the interval to subsequent TACE for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):672-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.24215. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
citation: Zhong BY, Ni CF, Chen L, Zhu HD, Teng GJ. Early Sorafenib-related Biomarkers for Combination Treatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):583-592. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161975. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
citation: Yao Q, Zhang H, Xiong B, Zheng C. Combination of sorafenib and TACE inhibits portal vein invasion for intermediate stage HCC: a single center retrospective controlled study. Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 8;8(45):79012-79022. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20745. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
citation: Zhu K, Huang J, Lai L, Huang W, Cai M, Zhou J, Guo Y, Chen J. Medium or Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Sorafenib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation. Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):300-307. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172028. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
citation: Lei XF, Ke Y, Bao TH, Tang HR, Wu XS, Shi ZT, Lin J, Zhang ZX, Gu H, Wang L. Effect and safety of sorafenib in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma who received transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective comparative study. World J Clin Cases. 2018 May 16;6(5):74-83. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i5.74.
citation: Ren B, Wang W, Shen J, Li W, Ni C, Zhu X. Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib versus TACE Alone for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study. J Cancer. 2019 Jan 29;10(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.7150/jca.28994. eCollection 2019.
citation: Qin S, Bi F, Gu S, Bai Y, Chen Z, Wang Z, Ying J, Lu Y, Meng Z, Pan H, Yang P, Zhang H, Chen X, Xu A, Cui C, Zhu B, Wu J, Xin X, Wang J, Shan J, Chen J, Zheng Z, Xu L, Wen X, You Z, Ren Z, Liu X, Qiu M, Wu L, Chen F. Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):3002-3011. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00163. Epub 2021 Jun 29.