Clinical trial NCT03654339: Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap
Official title: Comparison of Conventional vs Microsurgical Method for Root Coverage by Lateral Displacement Flap
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Gingival Recession, Localized
Lead sponsor: Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2018-08-31
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 20
Maximum age (years): 50
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: The patients will be equally divided into two test groups. Group A and Group B after phase I therapy. the group A patients will be treated with laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using microsurgical approach. The group B patients will be treated with laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using macrosurgical approach
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study was conducted to assess the evaluation of micro and Macro surgical approach in the treatment of grade II gingival recessions using the laterally repositioned flap

Detailed description: In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients)

The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 20-50 yrs
* ClassII gingival recession
* Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
* Sufficient width of attached gingiva

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any systemic diseases and smokers
* ClassI,III\&IV gingival recession
* Abnormal frenal attachments
* Interdental bone loss with tooth mobility

Primary outcomes:
measure: vertical depth of recession
timeFrame: Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: horizontal width of recession
timeFrame: Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Hyderabad
country: India
facility: Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences
state: Telangana
Study officials:
affiliation: panineeya mahavidyalaya institute of dental sciences
name: veerendranath reddy, MDS
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Nizam N, Bengisu O, Sonmez S. Micro- and macrosurgical techniques in the coverage of gingival recession using connective tissue graft: 2 years follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;27(2):71-83. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12124. Epub 2014 Nov 13.