Clinical trial NCT02121158: Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Implantation in the Elderly
Official title: CSP #592 - Efficacy and Safety of ICD Implantation in the Elderly
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease
Congestive Heart Failure
Myocardial Infarction
Keywords: CSP 592
ICD
cardiovascular
heart
aging
chronic diseases
multi-site trial
investigational device
cardiomyopathy
coronary artery disease
congestive heart failure
myocardial infarction
I-70
I70
elderly
defibrillator
Lead sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
Sponsor class: FED
First posted: 2014-04-23
Enrollment: 167
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 70
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death in patients 70 years and older. This study will assess the many competing factors involved with ICD implantation including 1) the impact on mortality, especially in the context of a declining rate of sudden death with advanced age, 2) the tolerability of the powerful therapeutic action of the device, and 3) the impact on quality of life.

Detailed description: The overall aim of this trial is to study the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation as a primary prevention strategy of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients 70 years and older. In particular, this study is designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of ICD, in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT), in reducing all-cause mortality, versus OMT alone; OMT includes standard intervention for chronic heart failure patients, i.e. lifestyle modification, disease management, adoption of healthy diet and exercise practices, etcetera. One particularly important secondary objective is to assess treatment efficacy under the conditions of high versus low co-morbidity burden.

Participants will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to ICD + OMT or OMT alone, and stratified by participating site and co-morbidity level (Charlson score \<3 versus 3+). Acute treatment visits will occur as clinically indicated and per local convention; follow-up will occur 1-4 months post-randomization (all participants), and not sooner than 30 days - and not later than 120 days post-implantation (ICD arm); regular follow-up will occur at 6 month intervals post-randomization until study close (all participants). All follow-up will be conducted centrally. Neither the participant nor treating clinician will be masked to treatment.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a primary prevention strategy with ICD implantation in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) is effective in reducing all-cause mortality compared to OMT alone in patients 70 years of age and older who are eligible for ICD therapy according to current Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria.

Primary Hypothesis:

The primary hypothesis of this study is that implantation of an ICD plus optimal medical therapy will reduce all-cause mortality in patients 70 years of age and older versus optimal medical therapy alone.

Secondary Objectives:

1. One secondary objective of this study is to ascertain whether age, co-morbidity burden, or age and burden together, are determinants in mortality outcomes in the OMT versus ICD + OMT group.
2. An additional secondary objective of the study is to determine the effect of ICD implantation plus optimal medical therapy on quality of life among elderly patients compared with optimal medical therapy alone.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. 70 years of age or older
2. Eligible for ICD implementation according to the CMS criteria for primary prevention by one of the following conditions:

   1. Documented prior MI and a measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<=30% (includes New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] class I, II, or III)
   2. Coronary artery disease with a documented prior MI, a measured left ventricular ejection fraction \<=35%, and inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) at electrophysiology (EP) study
   3. Ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM), documented prior MI, NYHA class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
   4. Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) \> 3 months, NYHA Class II and III heart failure, and measured LVEF \<=35%
3. Stable condition on Optimal Medical Therapy
4. Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Enrolled in or planning to enroll in a conflicting trial
2. Receiving a bi-ventricular ICD device
3. New York Heart Association class IV heart failure
4. Cardiogenic shock or symptomatic hypotension while in stable baseline rhythm,
5. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within the past 3 months
6. An MI within the past 40 days
7. Clinical symptoms or findings that would make them a candidate for coronary revascularization
8. Irreversible brain damage from pre-existing cerebral disease
9. Any disease other than cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, uremia, liver failure), associated with a likelihood of survival less than 1 year
10. Circumstance that would prevent completion of the trial and follow-up activities, including medical condition

Primary outcomes:
measure: Mortality
timeFrame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Quality of Life - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
timeFrame: Measured at 12-months post-randomization
measure: Sudden Cardiac Death
timeFrame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
measure: All-cause Hospitalization
timeFrame: Through study completion, starting from consent/baseline: average of 31 months.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Washington
country: United States
facility: Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
state: District of Columbia
city: Gainesville
country: United States
facility: North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
state: Florida
city: Minneapolis
country: United States
facility: Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
state: Minnesota
city: Portland
country: United States
facility: VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
state: Oregon
city: Nashville
country: United States
facility: Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN
state: Tennessee
Study officials:
affiliation: Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
name: Steve Singh, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Singh SN, Wininger M, Raitt M, Adabag S, Moore H, Rottman JN, Scrymgeour A, Zhang J, Zheng K, Guarino P, Kyriakides TC; I-70 Study Group; Johnson G, Williams A, Beed A, MacMurdy K, Saavedra P. Efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the elderly-The I-70 Study: A randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Apr 27;5(6):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.04.010. eCollection 2024 Jun.