Clinical trial NCT03816930: Evaluation of Gingival Health Parameters in Hybrid CAD / CAM Crowns Produced After Different Retraction Processes
Official title: Evaluation of Gingival Health Parameters in Hybrid CAD / CAM Crowns Produced After Different Retraction Processes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Periodontal Disease
Gingival Disease
Keywords: CAD/CAM
Gingival retraction
Lead sponsor: Yuzuncu Yıl University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-01-25
Enrollment: 52
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 60
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Clinically, the gingival retraction dentistry itself has found wide uses. It has achieved the use of subgingival and gingival crowns in fixed prostheses, cervical abrasion in restorative dentistry, management of root caries and root sensitivity, and recently in the use of appropriate measurements to improve the marginal fit of implant prostheses.There are three different retraction procedures described in the literature: mechanical, mechanical-chemical (chemically impregnated cords or matrix in injectable form) and surgery (electrosurgical, laser, cauterization, etc.)The mechanical method of retraction cords is not always suitable for patients' existing pocket depth, the necessity of using different combinations in shallow or deep pockets, the potential for limited bleeding control in chemically impregnated cords and the toxicity values in those who interact with chemical have led researchers to search for alternative methods. Especially inflammed gingiva is very sensitive to mechanical and chemical trauma. Studies have reported that gingival inflammation, pain, pocket formation, gingival withdrawal, increased bleeding and wound contamination occurred following retraction cord application. However, it is a known fact that the impression material is distorted or the accuracy of the measurement is decreased with the measurements taken without retraction. Nowadays, CAD / CAM (computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing) devices, which are designed to overcome these problems and eliminate the errors related to the measurement material, are the first step to be taken with a clear measure.Gingival retraction is recommended to improve the success of scanners in all restorations performed at the gingival or subgingival endpoint. Therefore, in our study, crown restorations will be produced from hybrid blocks by means of CAD / CAM device in order to evaluate the interaction of gingival health with hybrid blocks and to provide the latest technology and standardization.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Being systemically healthy
* To indicate crown restoration in mandibular molar teeth
* To be vital to the preparation of the crown of the teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

* Systemically unhealthy individuals
* Endodontic treatment of mandibular molar teeth
* Mandibular molar female individuals drawn for various reasons
* Pregnant women
* Periodontally unhealthy individuals

Primary outcomes:
measure: Retraction methods or procedures effects on gingival health
timeFrame: 3-12 months
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Van
country: Turkey
facility: Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci
Study officials:
References:
citation: Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):379-85. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.01277.x.
citation: Al-Ani A, Bennani V, Chandler NP, Lyons KM, Thomson WM. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants. N Z Dent J. 2010 Sep;106(3):92-6.
citation: Goldberg PV, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2001;25:100-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250108.x.
citation: Kopac I, Cvetko E, Marion L. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):14-9.
citation: Polat NT, Ozdemir AK, Turgut M. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):57-62.
citation: Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Ercoli C. Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):242-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90479-5.
citation: de Gennaro GG, Landesman HM, Calhoun JE, Martinoff JT. A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Apr;47(4):384-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(82)80085-1.
citation: Ahmed SN, Donovan TE. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul;114(1):81-5.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.015. Epub 2015 Apr 24.