Clinical trial NCT06287866: Pinch Grafting Versus Second Intention Wound Healing for Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects on the Scalp
Official title: Pinch Grafting Versus Second Intention Wound Healing for Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects on the Scalp
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Scarring
Keywords: Pinch graft
Lead sponsor: University of California, Davis
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-03-01
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Oftentimes, following surgery on the scalp, wounds are left to heal by themselves. This is called "second intention." Open wounds left to heal on the scalp often take 8 weeks or more to completely heal. The investigators are investigating how second intention closure compares to another established reconstruction technique, called "pinch graft." In the pinch graft technique, a dermatological surgeon numbs and then shaves off a thin piece of skin (usually from the groin area) and places it in the wound bed it (also known as "grafting"), to encourage growth of new healthy skin. This study will compare time-to-healing in the second intention method versus the pinch graft method.

Detailed description: Pinch graft methodology was first developed in 1976 as a treatment to accelerate healing of lower leg ulcerations, particularly venous or gravitational ulcerations (1, 2). It was later adapted as a tool to hasten healing in surgical wounds, such as surgical closure of diabetic foot wounds (3). It has also been used in the healing of patients with wounds related to dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (4). More recently, pinch grafts have been investigated as a reconstruction option for Mohs micrographic surgery defects (5). In this study, patients with below the knee Mohs surgical defects were randomized to receive either PG reconstruction or SIH reconstruction. Patients with PG reconstruction healed 20 days sooner (i.e., faster time to reepithelialization) than those who underwent SIH. Complication rates, including infection and reported pain, were also lower in the PG cohort compared to the SIH cohort. SIH is often recommended as a reconstruction technique for surgical wounds without adjacent skin laxity to support primary closure, such as the anterior lower extremity and scalp. There is no study to date examining the use of pinch grafts in scalp wounds. In our study, the investigators explore whether PG is a viable and useful reconstruction method for wounds on the scalp that otherwise would be left to close via SIH. Specifically, in our study, the investigators examine the comparative time to healing and complication rates between PG and SIH in Mohs surgical defects of the scalp.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 18 years of age or older
* Able to give informed consent themselves
* Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the scalp with predicted second intention closure
* Willing to return for follow up visit
* Active user of MyChart
* Willing to send weekly messages until wound is healed

Exclusion Criteria:

* Incarceration
* Under 18 years of age
* Pregnant women
* Unable to understand written and oral English
* Scalp wounds with planned primary repair reconstruction
* Surgical defects with bone exposure
* No MyChart access or use

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time to re-epithelialization
timeFrame: 1-8 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Observer Scar Assessment as measured by Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Patient Scar Assessment as measured by Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
timeFrame: 3 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Sacramento
country: United States
facility: University of California, Davis - Dermatology Department
state: California
Study officials:
affiliation: University of California, Davis - Dermatology
name: Daniel Eisen, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Burns DA, Sarkany I. Management of stasis ulcers by pinch graft. Br J Dermatol. 1976 Jul;95 Suppl 14:82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1976.tb07931.x. No abstract available.
citation: Millard LG, Roberts MM, Gatecliffe M. Chronic leg ulcers treated by the pinch graft method. Br J Dermatol. 1977 Sep;97(3):289-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1977.tb15185.x.
citation: Ramanujam CL, Zgonis T. Pinch graft harvesting technique for surgical closure of the diabetic foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012 Oct;29(4):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
citation: Claude O, Binder JP, Bustamante K, Blanchet-Bardon C, Andrivon F, Revol M, Servant JM. [Role of cutaneous pinch grafts in the healing of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa wounds: report of four cases]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Jun;50(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2004.11.010. Epub 2004 Dec 18. French.
citation: Willenbrink TJ, Brodland DG. Pinch Grafts Versus Second Intention Wound Healing for Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects Below the Knee: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Dermatol Surg. 2024 Nov 1;50(11):1010-1016. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004272. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
citation: Joo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Omlin K, Kappel ST, Eisen DB. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.