Clinical trial NCT05484518: Method of Levels for People Using Community Crisis Services
Official title: Is Method of Levels (MOL) an Acceptable and Feasible Psychological Intervention for People Using Community Based Crisis Services? A Case Series.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Individuals Presenting to Crisis Services
Lead sponsor: University of Manchester
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-08-02
Enrollment: 6
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Case series
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: A mental health crisis is when someone is so distressed they need urgent help from services; often because they behave in ways that poses risk to themselves or others. Crisis teams offer care in the community to support people at home rather than in hospital. Current psychological interventions offered by crisis teams tend to be short-term and mainly involve providing information about the difficulties people are experiencing and help them to develop skills, such people as problem solving. This can be useful, however providing more intensive psychological support has been much more difficult within crisis settings, as teams must use limited resources to focus on managing risk. A therapy, called Method of Levels (MOL), designed to be flexible, may be helpful to add to treatment offered by crisis services in the community.

MOL aims to help people hold their attention on a problem long enough to view it in different ways, so that they might think of new solutions. This works by helping a person to regain a sense of control in their life and feel less distressed. MOL is useful for working with lots of different issues, since therapy does not only focus on one type of problem. People also get to choose what is discussed in therapy and session structure.

Research has shown MOL can be useful for people in crisis in places such as inpatient settings. So far, no research has been conducted within the community for people in crisis. This study aims to examine if MOL can be delivered within a crisis service in a way that is helpful and acceptable to people. To do this, the investigators will offer MOL to a small number of people presenting to crisis teams and collect information on whether people take up the therapy, and their experience of receiving it.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adults, aged over 18 years.
2. Meet criteria for crisis services and currently working with the crisis team
3. Able to provide informed consent (no queries regarding capacity)
4. Willing to engage in psychological therapy.
5. Ability to speak English fluently enough to provide informed consent and engage in therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inability to provide informed consent.
2. Inability to speak English fluently enough to engage in therapy: As MOL is a therapy that relies on mobilising attention, the use of interpreters during therapy for non-English speakers may serve to alter the participants attention differently. This may confound results; as this is a preliminary case series, it would not be appropriate to include non-English speakers.
3. Problems of an organic nature, or a learning disability that might affect cognitive functioning.
4. Substance misuse as primary presenting problem.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Recruitment rate.
timeFrame: Length of study (up to one year)
measure: Retention rate.
timeFrame: Length of study (up to one year)
measure: Psychological Outcome Profiles.
timeFrame: Beginning of each therapy session for length of therapy (chosen by participant), up to 5 months
measure: Session Rating Scale.
timeFrame: End of each therapy session (chosen by participant), up to 5 months.
measure: Qualitative interviews
timeFrame: End of therapy, up to 5 months.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure
timeFrame: On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up
measure: Reorganisation of Conflict Scale.
timeFrame: On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up
measure: Suicidal ideation Attributes Scale.
timeFrame: On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up
measure: BBC Subjective Well-being scale (BBC-SWB) (Kinderman, Schwannauer, Pontin, & Tai, 2011).
timeFrame: On recruitment, monthly (up to 5 months), one month follow up
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Manchester
country: United Kingdom
facility: University of Manchester
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Manchester
name: Sara Goodier, MSc
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: