Clinical trial NCT02558049: Should I Continue Taking My Acid Reflux Medication? Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient Decision Aid
Official title: Should I Continue Taking My Acid Reflux Medication? Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient Decision Aid
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Proton Pump Inhibitors
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Keywords: Patient decision aid
Lead sponsor: University of Ottawa
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-09-23
Enrollment: 12
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treat problems such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In many patients with mild or moderate GERD, PPIs should be used for 1-2 months but are often continued longer unnecessarily. This is a problem because PPIs may cause harm when used long-term. PPI use is associated with severe C. difficile infections, fractures and pneumonia. Canada's public drug programs spent $247 million on PPIs in 2012 (not including Quebec or PEI). Due to concerns with long-term PPI use, patients may face the decision to continue their PPI, use a lower dose or stop and use on-demand (only when symptoms return). This decision should be made collaboratively between patients and clinicians, though patients tend to have a poor understanding of when reducing a drug is appropriate. Using a lower dose or using on-demand may be viewed as difficult because of the chance of symptoms returning. Patient decision aids (PDAs) inform patients on benefits and risks of treatment options and improve ability to make informed decisions and clarify values. OBJECTIVES: Develop a PDA to help patients with the decision to continue PPI or stop and use on-demand/use a lower dose. Evaluate whether: 1) the PDA changes patient preference to continue or stop and use on-demand/use a lower dose of PPI 2) the PDA improves patient knowledge and realistic expectations 3) patients and pharmacists feel they made a shared decision 4) there is a change in PPI prescribing 8 weeks post-PDA and 5) patients' choices match up with their values. METHODOLOGY: The PDA will be developed by a team of doctors, pharmacists and patients. It will be delivered during a visit with a pharmacist. Patients (n=54) will indicate which choice they prefer (continue PPI/stop or use lower dose) before and after going through the PDA. We will use Mcnemar's test to compare the number of patients preferring to continue their PPI before and after. We will evaluate whether there is a difference in knowledge test scores and expectations test scores before and after the PDA. After the PDA, we will ask patients and pharmacists to rate the extent to which shared decision making occurred and measure the agreement. Values/choice congruence will be evaluated using logistic regression. Eight weeks after patients have received the PDA, we will look at whether there is any reduction in PPI use.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Taking PPI for greater than or equal to 4 weeks, no current symptoms, taking PPI for mild to moderate upper GI symptoms (mild to moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease, grade A/B esophagitis)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Severe esophagitis (grade C/D), severe GERD or upper GI symptoms, currently experiencing upper GI symptoms, taking PPI for gastroprotection due to NSAID therapy (at moderate or high risk of GI bleed), history of Barrett's esophagus, history of bleeding peptic ulcer, taking PPI for treatment of current ulcer not healed

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Decision preference (continue PPI or stop and use on-demand/use a lower dose)
timeFrame: Single visit - immediately before decision aid delivered (baseline), immediately after decision aid delivered (15 minutes)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in Knowledge
timeFrame: Single visit - immediately before decision aid delivered (baseline), immediately after decision aid delivered (15 minutes)
measure: Change in Realistic expectations
timeFrame: Single visit - immediately before decision aid delivered (baseline), immediately after decision aid delivered (15 minutes)
measure: Values/choice congruence
timeFrame: Single visit - after decision aid is delivered (15 minutes)
measure: Agreement in rating of extent of shared decision-making
timeFrame: Single visit - immediately after decision aid is delivered (15 minutes)
measure: Change in Decisional conflict (SURE test)
timeFrame: Single visit - immediately before decision aid delivered (baseline), immediately after decision aid delivered (15 minutes)
measure: Change in PPI prescription
timeFrame: 8 weeks after decision aid is delivered
measure: Clinical symptoms at 8 weeks
timeFrame: 8 weeks after decision aid is delivered
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Ottawa
country: Canada
facility: Elisabeth Bruyere Hospital
state: Ontario
city: Ottawa
country: Canada
facility: Melrose FHT
state: Ontario
city: Ottawa
country: Canada
facility: Rideau FHT
state: Ontario
Study officials:
References:
citation: Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):308-28; quiz 329. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. Epub 2013 Feb 19. No abstract available.
citation: Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Oct 1;76(7):1005-12.
citation: Leri F, Ayzenberg M, Voyce SJ, Klein A, Hartz L, Smego RA Jr. Four-year trends of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor use after hospital discharge. South Med J. 2013 Apr;106(4):270-3. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31828db01f.
citation: Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, Singh S, Cavallazzi R, Loke YK. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;107(7):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.108. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
citation: Yu EW, Bauer SR, Bain PA, Bauer DC. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of 11 international studies. Am J Med. 2011 Jun;124(6):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.01.007.
citation: Spijker-Huiges A, Winters JC, Meyboom-De Jong B. Patients' views on dyspepsia and acid suppressant drug therapy in general practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(1):10-4. doi: 10.1080/13814780600757120.
citation: Reeve E, To J, Hendrix I, Shakib S, Roberts MS, Wiese MD. Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0106-8.
citation: Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Mullen PD, Ng CJ, van der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
citation: Durand MA, Witt J, Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe RG, Politi MC, Sivell S, Elwyn G. Minimum standards for the certification of patient decision support interventions: feasibility and application. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
citation: Legare F, Turcotte S, Stacey D, Ratte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID. Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice. Patient. 2012;5(1):1-19. doi: 10.2165/11592180-000000000-00000.
citation: Lachenbruch PA. On the sample size for studies based upon McNemar's test. Stat Med. 1992 Aug;11(11):1521-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111110.
citation: Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3091-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069.