Clinical trial NCT03892317: Improving Adherence in Nonadherent Kidney Transplant Patients
Official title: A Pharmacist Led, Patient Tailored Intervention to Improve Immunosuppressant Medication Adherence in Nonadherent Kidney Transplant Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Medication Adherence
Kidney Transplantation
Lead sponsor: Imperial College London
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-03-27
Enrollment: 42
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Organs for transplantation remain a scarce and precious resource with over 5000 patients currently on the kidney transplant waiting list. A kidney transplant costs approximately £17,000 in the first year and £5,000 per subsequent year. If the transplant fails, the patient must return to dialysis at an estimated cost of £30,800 per year or be retransplanted. While short term outcomes have improved steadily over the last 15-20 years, longer term outcomes haven't and after 10 years approximately 30% of kidney transplants have failed. Nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication is increasingly being associated with these poor long term outcomes and studies have estimated that 30- 50% of transplant patients are nonadherent to their immunosuppressive medication. The investigators want to determine whether immunosuppression medication adherence can be improved in a group of patients receiving tailored medication adherence support form a pharmacist. Adherence support will be provided for one year and will be individualised to each patient in the intervention group after identifying both their practical and perceptual barriers to adherence. The adherence interventions offered may include additional education and medication counselling, setting alarms, provision of a medication list, the use of a medications adherence app on a smart phone, reducing the number and frequency of tablets a patient takes or referral on to another health professional such as a social worker or psychologist for additional support. A range of clinical outcomes will be assessed for all patients on a regular basis in order to determine whether the provision of effective medication adherence support for the kidney transplant patients may help to optimise the long-term outcomes of these transplants

Detailed description: This study will be undertaken using a prospective, multidimensional design. 42 nonadherent kidney transplant patients will be included in the intervention group. The nonadherent patients will be identified through Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre (ICRTC) Outpatient Clinic based at Hammersmith Hospital. Standard and transplant specific demographics will be collected for all patients. All kidney transplant patients have their tacrolimus levels measured at each clinic visit. The variability of these levels can be used as a marker of their adherence. Patients with a high intrapatient variability (IPV) of their levels are said to be nonadherent. The Chief Investigator or another member of the research team will approach individual patients directly in the transplant out-patient clinic where they are members of the multidisciplinary clinical care team. The Chief Investigator or another member of the research team may also telephone patients to invite them to clinic to discuss participation in the trial. The Chief Investigator or another member of the research team will describe the study to the patient, answer any questions they have and provide them with a participant information sheet (PIS). Patients will be given the opportunity to take the PIS away and think about whether they would like to participate. A follow up discussion either in clinic or on the phone will be arranged with the patient to answer any queries they have within two weeks of providing them with the PIS; during that discussion, the Chief Investigator or other member of the research team will arrange an appointment in the transplant clinic with the patient to sign the consent form if they do decide to participate. Patients recruited into the study will receive pharmacist led, patient tailored interventions to improve immunosuppressant medication adherence. Patients will be included in the study for one year from recruitment.

The pharmacist led, patient tailored intervention will involve regular, intensive, personalised support from a pharmacist to improve adherence to immunosuppressive medications. The pharmacist will meet with the patient on a regular basis in the transplant clinic to identify their perceptual and practical barriers to adherence and agree a support plan that is tailored to them.

Within the first two weeks of recruitment, the study pharmacist will meet with the patient in transplant clinic to:

* Undertake a full medication history
* Discuss self-reported medication nonadherence
* Undertake the BAASIS questionnaire
* Ask the patient to complete a Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)
* Undertake a socioeconomic and educational assessment
* Undertake to gain collateral reporting of nonadherence by clinicians, relatives, friends or carers
* Perform a tacrolimus pill count
* Check in-house dispensing records of tacrolimus
* Identify barriers to adherence
* Tailor interventions and support to the needs of the patient
* Complete a motivational interview
* Agree to meet again during an outpatient clinic visit within an agreed time which is appropriate for the patient needs and within 3 months.

This first visit will provide a baseline assessment of the patient's medication adherence.

Tailored support may include:

* Setting alarms
* Medication diary card or calendar
* Medication compliance aid filled by the patient, family/carers or by a pharmacy professional
* Adherence app
* Reducing the complexity of the medication regime
* Positioning medication within their daily routine eg. by toothbrush
* Changing formulations
* Additional education regarding need for medication / timing of doses
* Referral to a social worker to assist with affordability of medicines
* Referral to a psychologist to explore deeper psychological issues regarding medicines taking

The structure of each follow up adherence review will be the same as the first formal adherence review with the exception that the BMQ will only be repeated at the end of the one year follow-up and the socioeconomic and educational assessment will only be undertaken at the first assessment review. Every patient will have a formal adherence assessment at recruitment and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. At the end of one year of follow-up, the specific benefits perceived by the patient of intensive adherence support from a pharmacist will be determined through a questionnaire.

Baseline nonadherence will be measured at the first visit with the study pharmacist within two weeks of recruitment and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The IPV of their tacrolimus levels and their outpatient clinic nonattendance rate will be measured retrospectively in the 12 months prior to recruitment to the study and then prospectively at the end of the intervention year. The IPV is calculated from the tacrolimus levels measured for an individual patient using the coefficient of variance mathematical formula - Coefficient of variance (COV) defined as: SD x 100 / Mean. The outpatient clinic nonattendance for each participant will be taken from the hospital integrated computer system.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult kidney transplant patients (18 years of age and above)
* Kidney transplant patients with an IPV of tacrolimus levels of greater than 18.15% in the previous 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

* Antibody incompatible transplants including patients with preformed HLA and blood group incompatible
* Previous rejection
* Donor specific antibody positive
* HIV positive patients
* Simultaneous pancreas and kidney patients
* Paediatric patients (less than 18 years of age)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Number of Patients Being Adherent/Non-aherent After the Intervention
timeFrame: One year
measure: Change in the Median IPV Before and After the Intervention
timeFrame: One year
measure: Change in Outpatient Clinic Nonattendance Rate Before and After the Intervention
timeFrame: One year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Biopsy Proven ACR / AMR
timeFrame: One year
measure: The Number of Readmissions
timeFrame: One year
measure: Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) or Transplant Glomerulopathy
timeFrame: One year
measure: Fibrosis, Hyalinosis, Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Toxicity or Diabetic Change on Toxicity
timeFrame: One year
measure: Graft Loss
timeFrame: One year
measure: Death
timeFrame: One year
measure: Serum Creatinine
timeFrame: One year
measure: eGFR
timeFrame: One year
measure: Proteinuria
timeFrame: One year
measure: Haematocrit
timeFrame: One year
measure: Haemoglobin
timeFrame: One year
measure: Albumin
timeFrame: One year
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre
Study officials:
affiliation: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
name: Dawn Goodall
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: De Bleser L, Matteson M, Dobbels F, Russell C, De Geest S. Interventions to improve medication-adherence after transplantation: a systematic review. Transpl Int. 2009 Aug;22(8):780-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00881.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
citation: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9 Suppl 3:S1-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02834.x.
citation: Denhaerynck K, Steiger J, Bock A, Schafer-Keller P, Kofer S, Thannberger N, De Geest S. Prevalence and risk factors of non-adherence with immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2007 Jan;7(1):108-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01611.x. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
citation: Fine RN, Becker Y, De Geest S, Eisen H, Ettenger R, Evans R, Rudow DL, McKay D, Neu A, Nevins T, Reyes J, Wray J, Dobbels F. Nonadherence consensus conference summary report. Am J Transplant. 2009 Jan;9(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02495.x.
citation: Gaston RS, Hudson SL, Ward M, Jones P, Macon R. Late renal allograft loss: noncompliance masquerading as chronic rejection. Transplant Proc. 1999 Jun;31(4A):21S-23S. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(99)00118-9. No abstract available.
citation: Morrissey PE, Flynn ML, Lin S. Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients. Drugs. 2007;67(10):1463-81. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767100-00007.
citation: Morrissey PE, Reinert S, Yango A, Gautam A, Monaco A, Gohh R. Factors contributing to acute rejection in renal transplantation: the role of noncompliance. Transplant Proc. 2005 Jun;37(5):2044-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.017.
citation: Prendergast MB, Gaston RS. Optimizing medication adherence: an ongoing opportunity to improve outcomes after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jul;5(7):1305-11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07241009. Epub 2010 May 6.
citation: Schafer-Keller P, Steiger J, Bock A, Denhaerynck K, De Geest S. Diagnostic accuracy of measurement methods to assess non-adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008 Mar;8(3):616-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02127.x.
citation: Wiebe C, Nevins TE, Robiner WN, Thomas W, Matas AJ, Nickerson PW. The Synergistic Effect of Class II HLA Epitope-Mismatch and Nonadherence on Acute Rejection and Graft Survival. Am J Transplant. 2015 Aug;15(8):2197-202. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13341. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
citation: Sellares J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Reeve J, Einecke G, Sis B, Hidalgo LG, Famulski K, Matas A, Halloran PF. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):388-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
citation: Roberts DM, Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review. Transplantation. 2012 Oct 27;94(8):775-83. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31825d1587.
citation: Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ, Goldberg A, Birk PE, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
citation: Pinsky BW, Takemoto SK, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR. Transplant outcomes and economic costs associated with patient noncompliance to immunosuppression. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2597-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02798.x.
citation: Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2004 Mar 15;77(5):769-76. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000110408.83054.88.
citation: Massey EK, Tielen M, Laging M, Timman R, Beck DK, Khemai R, van Gelder T, Weimar W. Discrepancies between beliefs and behavior: a prospective study into immunosuppressive medication adherence after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2015 Feb;99(2):375-80. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000608.
citation: Massey EK, Tielen M, Laging M, Beck DK, Khemai R, van Gelder T, Weimar W. The role of goal cognitions, illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in self-reported adherence after kidney transplantation: a cohort study. J Psychosom Res. 2013 Sep;75(3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
citation: Dew MA, DiMartini AF, De Vito Dabbs A, Myaskovsky L, Steel J, Unruh M, Switzer GE, Zomak R, Kormos RL, Greenhouse JB. Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2007 Apr 15;83(7):858-73. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000258599.65257.a6.