Clinical trial NCT01190033: Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Official title: STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Low Back Pain
Lead sponsor: University of Sao Paulo
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2010-08-27
Enrollment: 40
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.

Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded.

The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.

Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.

In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.

The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith \& Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.

The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
* present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
* present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) \> 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

* patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
* patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
* patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Pain Evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
measure: Pain Evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
measure: Pain Evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
measure: Pain Evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
measure: Pain Evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Disability evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
measure: Medial Block Improvement
timeFrame: one day after the medial branch block
measure: Health Status
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
measure: Disability evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
measure: Disability evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
measure: Disability evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
measure: Disability evaluation
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
measure: Health Status
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
measure: Health Status
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
measure: Health Status
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
measure: Health Status
timeFrame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Sao Paulo
country: Brazil
facility: Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P
state: SP
Study officials:
References: