Clinical trial NCT03341442: A Study of Posterior Hip Precautions After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Official title: Are Posterior Hip Precautions Necessary? A Randomized, Controlled Study of Posterior Hip Precautions After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Osteoarthritis of Hip
Lead sponsor: West Virginia University
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: University of Kentucky
name: Andrews Institute Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
First posted: 2017-11-14
Enrollment: 321
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized controlled study to compare patients undergoing THA via a posterolateral approach to receive either standard of care post-surgery hip restrictions or to receive no restrictions. The investigators goal is to first complete a pilot study in which the investigators assess the short term dislocation rates 3-6 months and then continue to recruit into this study and follow these patients for a year to determine the 1 year risk for dislocation. The investigators also will compare the HOOS Jr. and VAS scores and time until free from walking aid. The research question is: Will the elimination of post operative posterior hip precautions increase the dislocation rate? The hypothesis is that the elimination of post operative hip precautions will not increase the dislocation rate.

Detailed description: 1. Participants at the following institutions (West Virginia University; The Andrews Institute; and University of Kentucky Healthcare Sports Medicine will be given an educational session regarding hip replacement and procedures to follow after total hip replacement at their History and Physical visit prior to elective total hip replacement surgery via a posterior approach. 2. Participants will be told of the study after their educational session. All their questions will be answered and they will be given the opportunity to consent for participation. 3. After consent, the participant will be randomized to a control group receiving Standard of Care (education) hip precautions or to a 'no hip precautions' group. The control group will be instructed to practice postoperative hip precautions they learned at their educational session; (standard of care) (no flexion \> 90 degrees, no internal rotation, no adduction) for 6 weeks. The intervention group will be aware of the precautions but will be told not to practice them post-operatively. 4. The participants will be monitored per the surgeons' normal routine post-operatively, which includes notification to the surgeon if the subject returns to the hospital with any hip problems. 5. After the first three participants who were randomized to 'no precautions' have returned for their post-op visit at all sites, the DSMB will have a teleconference to discuss any adverse events including dislocations. If any of the first 3 participants dislocated the study will be stopped. 6. At six weeks the following will be recorded: time to elimination of walking aids, dislocation episodes requiring closed reduction, and need for revision surgery. If any of the first 3 intervention participants dislocated during the 6 week period, the study will be stopped. 7. The participants will be asked to complete the HOOS Jr. and VAS follow-up questions at 2-week, 6-week, 3 month, 6 month and one year post-operatively per standard of care follow-up. Participants will be asked to list any hip precautions practiced at these time frames. 8. If the participants fail to come for the standard of care follow up appointments, the research assistant will call the participants and ask the HOOS Jr. and VAS questionnaires over the phone and to list any hip precautions they practiced.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* scheduled for elective, primary, osteoarthritic total hip arthroplasty via a posterolateral approach

Exclusion Criteria:

* \< 18 years of age, cognitive disorders, neuromuscular spasticity disorders, femoral neck fractures, connective tissue disorders (ie Ehlers Danlos), alcohol abuse, dual mobility implant, constrained implants, pregnant or planning to become pregnant at time of consent.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Dislocation Rate
timeFrame: up to 1 year post op
Secondary outcomes:
measure: HOOS, JR (hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement)
timeFrame: up to 1 year post op
measure: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
timeFrame: up to 1 year post op
measure: Time free from walking aid
timeFrame: up to 1 year post op
measure: Hip Precautions Practiced
timeFrame: up to 6 week post-op
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Morgantown
country: United States
facility: WVU Medicine Department of Orthopaedics
state: West Virginia
Study officials:
affiliation: West Virginia University
name: Matthew J Dietz, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Austrailian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry., Annual Report. 2012
citation: Hummel MT, Malkani AL, Yakkanti MR, Baker DL. Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.026. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
citation: Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;12(5):314-21. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200409000-00006.
citation: Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jan;(418):162-7. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00026.
citation: Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(2):214-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.63B2.7217144.
citation: Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78.
citation: Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355):224-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00023.
citation: Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):20-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00004.
citation: Schmidt-Braekling T, Waldstein W, Akalin E, Benavente P, Frykberg B, Boettner F. Minimal invasive posterior total hip arthroplasty: are 6 weeks of hip precautions really necessary? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):271-274. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2146-x. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
citation: Barnsley L, Barnsley L, Page R. Are Hip Precautions Necessary Post Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Sep;6(3):230-5. doi: 10.1177/2151458515584640.
citation: Restrepo C, Mortazavi SM, Brothers J, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1668-y.
citation: Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
citation: Graves SC, Dropkin BM, Keeney BJ, Lurie JD, Tomek IM. Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30.