Clinical trial NCT01883375: Dignity Talk: Helping Palliative Care Patients and Families Have Important Conversations
Official title: Dignity Talk: a Novel Palliative Care Intervention for Patients and Their Families
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Palliative Care
Family
End of Life Care
Keywords: Palliative Care
Family
adaptation, psychological
Lead sponsor: University of Manitoba
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
First posted: 2013-06-21
Enrollment: 56
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Brief summary: Dying patients and their families face many challenges near the end-of-life. Not only do patients often experience physical distress, but they also have feelings of loss of dignity, isolation, and uncertainty. Family members also face many challenges. They bear witness to the suffering of loved ones, and they face uncertainty, loss, and at times a mounting sense of helplessness.

The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new intervention called Dignity Talk, meant to enhance end-of-life experience for both patients and their families. Dignity Talk is based on a set of questions by which terminally ill patients and their family members can engage in meaningful conversations with each other. It is intended to lessen feelings of loss and helplessness and enhance feelings of connectedness by facilitating conversations that tap into a sense of meaning and purpose, sharing of memories, wishes, hopes, and giving guidance to those who will soon be left behind.

In Phase 1, 20 patients and family members will help finalize the method and Dignity Talk question framework (is it easy to understand, do the investigators have the right questions, and is the wording sensitive). In Phase 2 of the study the investigators will ask 100 patient-family pairs for feedback about Dignity Talk: what influence it had on their palliative care experience, whether it works well, and whether this intervention should become a regular part of palliative care. The investigators will also ask for feedback from health-care providers in both phases. We are requesting approval for an amendment to the healthcare provider feedback focus group questions. Will add those documents when they are approved.

Four to six months after the death of their loved one, the investigators will contact the family member to ask their thoughts about Dignity Talk, how it shaped their experience of their grief and bereavement.

The investigators expect that the study will show that Dignity Talk can be an effective, highly accessible palliative care intervention, which will enhance the end-of-life experience for palliative patients and the families who support them.

Detailed description: See above summary

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

For Patient:

Patients being cared for:

* in a palliative care unit or whose care is focused on palliation as determined by clinical staff
* or patients who have have a confirmed diagnosis of amyotropic lateral sclerosis, and have symptoms in a domain that interferes with their social or occupation functioning: a) mobility, b) dysphasia, c) dyspnea, or d) speech or patients who have are have been on dialysis \> 3 months and are \> 60 years of age - or residents of Personal Care Home all of whom are:
* 18 years of age or older
* able to provide informed oral and written consent
* cognitive capacity (based on clinical consensus)

For Family Member or Close Friend:

* Family member or close friend who the patient identifies they would be comfortable talking with using the Dignity Talk question framework
* Family member who is 18 years of age or older
* Family member who is able to provide oral and written consent
* Family member who has cognitive capacity to participate in meaningful conversation (based on research staff decision)

For Healthcare Provider:

* Employed one of the participating sites
* in a discipline directly involved in clinical care (physician, nursing, social work, spiritual care, allied healthcare, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria:

* not meeting the above inclusion criteria

Primary outcomes:
measure: Family communication connectedness Index
timeFrame: 31 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
timeFrame: 31 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Victoria
country: Canada
facility: Victoria Hospice
state: British Columbia
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: St. Boniface Hospital
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Riverview Health Centre
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Concordia Hospital
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Deer Lodge Centre
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Grace Hospital
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Health Sciences Centre
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Manitoba Renal Program
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Seven Oaks Hospital
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Victoria Hospital
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority
state: Manitoba
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: WRHA Personal Care Homes
state: Manitoba
city: Hamilton
country: Canada
facility: Dr. Bob Kemp Hospice
state: Ontario
Study officials:
References:
citation: Guo Q, Chochinov HM, McClement S, Thompson G, Hack T. Development and evaluation of the Dignity Talk question framework for palliative patients and their families: A mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):195-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734696. Epub 2017 Nov 13.