Clinical trial NCT01349413: BRAVO Study for Functional Dyspepsia
Official title: Role of Gastroesophageal Acid Reflux at Squamo-columnar Junction in Functional Dyspepsia
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Dyspepsia
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Keywords: Functional dyspepsia
symptom response
postprandial fullness
gastroesophageal reflux disease
acid suppression
Lead sponsor: Chinese University of Hong Kong
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2011-05-06
Enrollment: 130
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: Background:

Functional dyspepsia is one of the commonest digestive disorders. The pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia is uncertain. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has been recommended as the first line treatment for functional dyspepsia. However, the results on effectiveness of PPI are conflicting and it has been suggested that PPI is only effective for acid-related symptoms.

The investigators plan to use a wireless pH monitoring system positioned at the junction of esophagus and stomach to evaluate the chronological relationship between acid exposure at this region and symptoms of dyspepsia as well as its impact on the efficacy of acid suppressive therapy in treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Indication:

Functional dyspepsia patients

Study center(s):

Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong

Aims:

1. To evaluate the chronological relationship between acid exposure at squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) and dyspeptic symptom in different subtypes of functional dyspepsia
2. To evaluate the relationship between acid exposure at squamo-columnar junction and dyspeptic symptom response to PPI
3. To compare the efficacy of PPI and placebo in treating functional dyspepsia patients

Study medication:

Esomeprazole 20mg vs Placebo o.d.

Study design:

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

Number of subjects: 130

Patient population:

Functional dyspepsia patients without concomitant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Duration of study:

1 June 2010 - 30 May 2012

Primary variable(s):

Proportion of patients who report positive response to adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms at week 8

Secondary variable(s):

Dyspeptic symptom scores, symptom association probability of dyspeptic symptoms in relation to esophageal pH of less than 4 as measured at 1 cm above SCJ.

Number of visits: 2

Hypothesis:

Increased acid exposure at SCJ contributes to dyspeptic symptom and predicts treatment response to PPI in FD patients without concomitant GERD

Detailed description: Baseline assessment:

All patients will be invited to complete self-administered questionnaires for demographics and baseline symptom assessment

* Demographics: age, gender
* Screening of functional gastrointestinal disorder based on the Rome III questionnaires
* Functional dyspepsia symptom questionnaire: an 8-item dyspeptic symptom score questionnaire using 4-point (0-3) Likert scale based on recall of the past 7 days for assessment of epigastric pain, epigastric burning, belching, bloating, postprandial fullness, early satiation, nausea and vomiting. Functional dyspepsia will be further classified into epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) according to the Rome III definitions.
* Global dyspeptic symptom assessment: a dichotomous patient-reported scale in which they are asked to give a response of either "Yes" or "No" to the inquiry "Do you have adequate relief of dyspeptic symptom over the last 7 days?"
* GERD symptom questionnaire: Patients will also be asked to report the frequency of heartburn or acid regurgitation over the last 3 months. Patients with frequency of reflux symptoms of more than twice per month are deemed to have concomitant GERD and they will be excluded from the study.
* Psychological disorder: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) will be used for screening of concomitant psychological disorder such as depression and generalized anxiety disorder.

Upper endoscopy and BRAVO pH capsule insertion:

Upper endoscopy will be arranged within 2 weeks of baseline assessment in order to exclude organic pathology such as peptic ulcer, esophagitis and neoplasm. The position and morphology of gastroesophageal junction is assessed during withdrawal of endoscope after deflation of stomach at end-expiratory of the patient in left lateral body position. The morphology of gastroesophageal junction will be graded according to the "flap valve" concept. In order to avoid the confounding effect of gross anatomical disruption of gastroesophageal junction on acid exposure at SCJ, patients with grade IV disruption of gastroesophageal junction, which refers to patulous hiatus with axial displacement of SCJ, will be excluded.

After completion of endoscopy examination, the BRAVO delivery system will be passed orally into esophagus in the same body position. The endoscope is then reintroduced to facilitate positioning of the delivery system under direct visualization. The BRAVO pH capsule will be placed at 1 cm proximal to SCJ for monitoring of acid exposure at SCJ.

Recording of esophageal pH profile and symptoms:

The wireless esophageal pH monitoring will last for 48 hours. During the study period, the patients will be instructed to engage in their usual daily activities. The patients will be given a diary documenting meals, sleeping and dyspeptic symptoms. The patient has to return the Bravo data recorder after 48 hours.

Randomization of treatment:

After completion of BRAVO pH monitoring, patients will be randomly assigned to either esomeprazole 20mg daily or identical looking placebo for 8 weeks. The random allocation sequence will be obtained from a computer-generated list of random numbers in blocks of 10. Concealed allocation is achieved by an independent staff who assigns treatments according to consecutive numbers in sealed envelopes. Study medications are dispensed as sealed packages in consecutive numbers. Medication adherence is measured by pill counts during final visit (V2).

Follow-up assessment:

The patients will report their individual dyspeptic symptoms on weekly basis using a self administered symptom questionnaire. At week 4 and week 8, they will need to give an additional rating on their overall symptom response using global symptom assessment. The patients are required to give a dichotomous response of either "yes" or "no" to the question stating "Do you have adequate relief of symptoms over the past 7 days?"

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with functional dyspepsia that fulfill Rome III criteria with inadequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms
* Age \>18
* Provision of written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Presence of organic pathology identified by upper endoscopy or other investigations
* Presence of sliding hiatus hernia as defined by flap valve grade IV disruption of morphology at gastro-esophageal junction
* Concurrent medications that affect gastrointestinal motility
* Presence of acid reflux or heartburn symptoms of more than twice a month
* History of gastric surgery
* H. pylori infection
* Use of PPI or NSAID in the past 4 weeks
* Pregnancy
* Known hypersensitivity to PPI

Primary outcomes:
measure: The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who report positive response to adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms at week 8.
timeFrame: Week 8
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The secondary outcome measures include dyspeptic symptom scores, symptom association probability of dyspeptic symptoms in relation to esophageal pH of less than 4 as measured at 1 cm above SCJ.
timeFrame: 1st visit and 8 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Hong Kong
country: Hong Kong
facility: Prince of Wales Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Chinese University of Hong Kong
name: Justin CY Wu, MBChB(CUHK)
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: