Clinical trial NCT04140006: Efficacy of Antiresorptive and Bone Forming Material on Dental Implants
Official title: Evaluation of Topical Application of Alendronate Sodium In-situ Gel and Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 on Dental Implant Stability and Crestal Bone Level: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE1
PHASE2
Conditions: Partial Edentulism
Lead sponsor: University of Baghdad
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-10-25
Enrollment: 20
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Insertion of a metal implant is considered one of the most common surgeries for fracture treatment, joint replacement, and dental implants. The success rate of these implants depends on their fixation which is in turn related primarily on the strength of the bone holding them. Studies evaluating the influence of local application of antiresorptive drugs, like bisphosphonates, on implanted endoprostheses whether orthopedic or dental is increasing annually with more and more experimental studies as well as clinical trials worldwide. On the other hand implants that release medications that enhance bone formation will lead to improved implant fixation and success. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of alendronate sodium gel and recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 2 on dental implant stability and crestal bone level.

Detailed description: Bisphosphonates (BPs), which are so called because they have two phosphonate (PO3) groups, are structurally similar to natural pyrophosphate (PP), a normal product of human metabolism that has a calcium chelating property. They are used to treat bone metastases, osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and other skeletal disorders.

During bone remodeling, osteoclast bone resorptive action is impeded by BPs which are released into the resorption lacunae. These cells take up BPs from resorption lacunae and the BPs then trigger the osteoclasts to undergo apoptosis. It has been found that an adjunct treatment of implant site with BPs solution might be beneficial to initial osseointegration of immediately or delayed loaded dental implants without interfering significantly with peri-implant bone remodeling over time.

Oral or intravenous administrations are the classical BPs treatment modalities with many studies show their positive effect on peri-implant bone. More efficient delivery systems to the target sites have been investigated to minimize BPs side effects and alter their biodistribution in order to improve their bioavailability; one of those new systems is topical application. Topical application of BPs enhances osseointegration, promote implant-bone contact and increase the amount of bone peripheral to dental implants. Minimal amounts of bisphosphonates was found to improve early implant fixation and to be less prone to cause osteonecrosis of the jaw, this might lead to new possibilities for orthopedic surgery in osteoporotic bones and for dental implants with a smaller risk of such complication in comparison with systemic treatment.

In order to maximize anabolism and minimize catabolism, new coating strategies have been evolved to enhanced bone formation onto the implant surface which is more desired than only reduce bone resorption around it. So to improve implant osseointegration, a dedicated drug-loading ability to locally target bone disorders has been developed to combine antiresorptive and anabolic agents, such as bone morphogenic protein, which for instance and in osteoporotic bone, will improve bone healing process.

With a view to diminishing the side effects caused by the systemic use of BPs, such as oesophagitis and osteonecrosis of the jaw, and to maximize anabolism and minimize catabolism, recent studies have sought alternative systems for local delivery of these agents with or without bone forming agent, either by means of immobilizing on the implant surface (coating or immersion in BPs solution), or by applying the drug directly to the surgical site before implant insertion either as an irrigant or gel.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria Otherwise healthy patients over 18 years or with systemic diseases that do not interfere with bone healing Having single or multiple missing teeth in maxilla and/or mandible Having an alveolar ridge of sufficient vertical and horizontal dimensions and considered straightforward cases according to SAC classification

Exclusion criteria Patients with active or chronic infection or inflammation in the implant zone History of radiotherapy to the head and neck Past or current treatment with oral/intramuscular/intravenous bisphosphonates or other drugs altering bone metabolism Heavy smokers or with sever periodontitis

Primary outcomes:
measure: Implant stability
timeFrame: 8 weeks
measure: Implant stability
timeFrame: 12 weeks post surgery
measure: Implant stability
timeFrame: 12 weeks post loading
measure: Crestal bone level
timeFrame: 12 weeks post surgery
measure: Crestal bone level
timeFrame: 12 weeks post loading
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Bone density around dental implant
timeFrame: 12 weeks post surgery
measure: Bone density around dental implant
timeFrame: 12 weeks post loading
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Baghdad
country: Iraq
facility: College of dentistry, University of Baghdad
state: Bab-Almoadham
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Baghdad
name: Salwan Y Bede
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: