Clinical trial NCT04908670: Comparison of the Effect of Spine Grade I and II Manipulation and a PNE Video on Brainwaves: Pilot Study
Official title: The Effect of Low-grade Spinal Oscillations Compared to a Pain Neuroscience Education Video on Electroencephalogram (EEG) Brain Activity on Individuals With Chronic Spine Pain: Pilot Study. WITH CHRONIC SPINE PAIN: PILOT STUDY
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Chronic Pain
Manipulation
Psychologic
Keywords: Pain neuroscience education
EEG
Spinal manipulation
Lead sponsor: Florida Gulf Coast University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-06-01
Enrollment: 20
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 20
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Half of the group was assigned randomly to receive intervention 1 and during the second visit intervention 2. The other half received intervention 2 first followed by intervention 1 on subsequent visit
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the use of a pain neuroscience educational video instruction on brainwave activity and compare this to the effects of a grade I \& II PA spinal oscillations of the spine using EEG in individuals with chronic pain.

Detailed description: This quasi-experimental pilot study compared differences in brainwave activity in subjects with chronic spinal pain following PA spinal oscillations and after viewing a 5-minute pain neuroscience educational video.

In this within subject's design all subjects were given the two interventions on two different days. To prevent the order of the intervention to influence the study results the subjects were randomized into two different groups, A and B. Group A received PA spinal oscillations on their first visit and. Group B's underwent the opposite and watched a pain neuroscience education video on their first visit and received PA spinal oscillations on their first visit. Both sessions and interventions were lead and performed by the Doctor of Physical Therapy student under the direct supervision of the lead physical therapist, who is manually trained and holds a Cranio-Facial Certification. In order to standardize the location of the PA spinal oscillation intervention so brain activity and response can be properly compared, C7, T4 and L4 were identified and marked with a pen prior to any measures. Identification of L4 was achieved by placing hands on the subject's iliac crests with thumbs pointing toward one another. Keeping hands straight and parallel to the floor, thumbs will move medially, landing on L4.25 To identify C7, the subject was taken through cervical extension, where C6 will disappear and C7 remains in place.26 Once C7 was located, the spinous processes were palpated and counted until the level of T4, which was marked. Various factors can affect the reliability of this process, such as subject obesity, therapist experience, and anatomical differences.25 Studies show reliability for this method to be low.25,26 However, these studies, as with most, use a small sample size and only using one palpatory landmark for each level examined.25,26 To standardize variables, the methods above were used in conjunction with palpation of surrounding vertebrae. To measure brain wave activity during this study the 14-lead Emotiv EPOC portable EEG headset was used. Each participant wore the headset throughout the measurement and was in a seated position. After the EEG headset was placed properly and connection with the system had been appropriately established the subjects remained seated in a quiet room for three minutes to accommodate to the room environment before the first EEG measurement. After this, a 1-minute EEG recording was taken. This measurement served as the participant's baseline measurement. Group A subjects then received a grade I \& II spinal oscillations of three identified segments (C7, T4, and L4), 1 minute per segment for a total of 3 minutes. Directly following this a second 1-minute EEG recording was taken. On the subsequent visit, group A again underwent the three-minute seated accommodation period with the EEG headset on, followed by a 1 minute baseline EEG measurement prior to watching a 5 minute pain neuroscience educational video Understanding Pain in less than 5 minutes, and what to do about it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_3phB93rvI. A 1-minute EEG recording was taken during the first minute of the video and again during the last minute of the video. Immediately after watching the pain neuroscience educational video a 1-minute EEG recording was taken. The measurement protocol for group B was the same, but in reversed order. They watched the pain neuroscience educational video at their first visit and the PA spinal oscillations on their next visit.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects in this study were males and female between the ages of 20 to 65 years with chronic lower back pain (\> 3 months). Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

were not meeting the age requirement having pain less than three months having conditions that would be a contraindication for the grade I-II PA spinal oscillations Those with known neurological conditions making EEG measures unreliable.

Primary outcomes:
measure: EEG power in alpha, delta, gamma, and theta waves
timeFrame: 4- 10 seconds measures of all wave bands in one session measures
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Merrillville
country: United States
facility: Integrated therapy Practice PC
state: Indiana
Study officials:
References: