Clinical trial NCT02266719: Clinical Outcomes and Radiation Safety After Endovascular Repair of Complex AAAs Using Fenestrated- Branched Devices
Official title: Clinical Outcomes and Radiation Safety After Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Using Fenestrated and Branched Devices
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Phase: NA
Conditions: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Thoracic Aneurysm
Keywords: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal [C14.907.055.239.075]
Thoracic Aneurysm
Lead sponsor: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2014-10-17
Enrollment: 625
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The study is divided in three groups, as follows:

Patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms including, juxtarenal, suprarenal and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms will be enrolled in the fenestrated-CMD group.

Patients with type I-III throacoabdominal aneurysms will be enrolled in the type I-III TAAAs groups and will be eligible for custom-made/ off-the-shelf branched devices.

Patients with high surgical risk with aortic arch aneurysms treated by patient-specific stent-grafts with one to three inner branches or a scallop.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes and radiation of the use of off-the-shelf and custom-made devices (CMDs) for the endovascular repair of juxtarenal, suprarenal, thoracoabdominal and arch aortic aneurysms in patients having appropriate anatomy. The study consists of three cohorts. The first 2 cohorts are the continuation of the current IDE study. The first cohort is aimed to assess the use of custom-made devices (CMDs) for the endovascular repair of juxtarenal, suprarenal and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in standard and high-risk patients having appropriate anatomy (Fenestrated-CMD cohort). The second cohort (Type I-III thoracoabdominal cohort) includes standard and high-risk patients with type I- III thoracoabdominal aneurysms that require the use of branched/fenestrated CMDs, or, in selected cases, the Zenith Thoracoabdominal Branch (Zenith® t-Branch™) device. Finally, the third cohort (the Arch cohort) will include 25 high-risk patients with aortic arch aneurysms treated by patient-specific stent-grafts with one to three inner branches or a scallop

Detailed description: This study is a prospective, single center, non-randomized, triple-cohort study. For the Fenestrated-CMD cohort a total of 350 patients will be enrolled. For the type I-III thoracoabdominal cohort, a total of 250 patients will be enrolled. For the Arch cohort, 25 patients will be enrolled. CMDs will be used primarily. Off-the-shelf devices will be used in urgent cases and when the waiting period for design and manufacturing of a CMD may not be considered acceptable. Staged endovascular repair will be used for type I, II and III TAAAs and for concurrent arch and TAAAs, unless the condition of the patient requires a single stage endovascular repair. A separate subgroup analysis of patients undergoing procedures with off-the-shelf devices will be performed.

Eligibility criteria: General Inclusion Criteria

A patient is deemed suitable for inclusion in the study if the patient has at least one the following:

1. Juxtarenal or suprarenal AAA, type I-IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms or aortic arch aneurysms or dissections with diameter ≥5.0 cm in diameter or 2 times the normal aortic diameter;
2. Aneurysm with history of growth ≥0.5 cm/year;
3. Saccular aneurysm with aortic diameter greater than 1.5 times the normal aortic diameter that is deemed to be at risk for rupture based upon physician interpretation.
4. Patients that are not eligible for treatment with commercially available endografts.
5. Presence of concomitant thoracoabdominal and aortic arch aneurysm meeting one of the above-mentioned criteria.

General Exclusion Criteria

A patient must be excluded from the clinical investigation if any of the following are true:

1. Age \<18 years;
2. Life expectancy \<2 years;
3. Pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning on becoming pregnant within 60 months;
4. Inability or refusal to give informed consent by the patient or a legally authorized representative;
5. Unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule;
6. Prior surgical or interventional procedure within 30 days of the anticipated date of the fenestrated procedure, with the exception of planned staged procedures to provide access for repair (e.g. staged iliac conduit, thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for proximal aneurysms, elephant trunk repair), to facilitate the procedure by allowing open reparation of a target artery not amenable to revascularization with the investigational device, such us an internal iliac artery, subclavian artery or visceral artery with early bifurcation, tortuosity or occlusive disease preventing successful placement and alignment side stents, or to treat proximal aortic aneurysms.
7. Participation in another clinical or device trial, with the exception of observational studies, participation in another investigational endovascular endograft protocol, percutaneous aortic valve protocol, or concomitant clinical trials designed to evaluate medical therapy strategies to reduce perioperative risk during fenestrated-branched endovascular repair, including risks of renal dysfunction, contrast-induced nephropathy, neurologic, spinal cord or cardiac complications, and/or use of advanced imaging to reduce radiation exposure during implantation of these devices. Participation in investigational device trials not encompassed by the IDE protocol should be performed remotely from the fenestrated/branched repair (\>30 days). Participation in medical therapy trial or advanced imaging trial designed to improve peri-operative outcomes or to reduce radiation exposure of fenestrated/branched endografts may be concurrent with the IDE study. Examples include therapy directed to reduce rates of spinal cord injury, stroke and contrast-induced nephropathy associated with implantation of fenestrated-branched stent-grafts or advanced imaging trials designed to reduce radiation exposure during repair.
8. Patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm requiring urgent or emergent repair, with the exception of patients with contained, stable ruptures with anatomy suitable for an off-the-shelf design.
9. Patients who meet anatomical criteria for commercially available aortic stent-grafts according to proposed instructions for use of these devices.

Medical Exclusion Criteria

Patients must be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are true:

1. Known sensitivities or allergies to stainless steel, nitinol, polyester, solder (tin, silver), polypropylene, urethane or gold
2. History of anaphylactic reaction to contrast material that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
3. Leaking or ruptured aneurysm associated with hypotension
4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy
5. Mycotic aneurysm or patients with evidence of active systemic infection.
6. History of connective tissue disorder (e.g. vascular Ehlers Danlos, Marfan syndrome), with the exception of those patients who had prior open surgical aortic replacement or endovascular repair, where a surgical graft or an endograft would serve as landing zone for the investigational endograft, those who are deemed prohibitive risk for open repair or connective tissue disorders with no vascular effects (e.g. non-vascular types of Ehlers Danlos).
7. Body habitus that would inhibit x-ray visualization of the aorta and its branches.

Anatomical Exclusion Criteria

Patient must be excluded from the study if any of the following is true:

1. Inadequate femoral or iliac access compatible with the requirements of the required delivery system.
2. Inability to perform a temporary or permanent open surgical or endovascular iliac conduit for patients with inadequate femoral/iliac access.
3. Absence of a landing aortic segment in the distal thoracic aorta above the diaphragmatic hiatus with:

   1. A diameter measured outer to the outer wall greater than 42 mm or less than 19 mm;
   2. Parallel aortic wall with \>20% diameter change and with significant calcification and/or thrombus in the selected area of the seal zone.
4. Visceral anatomy not compatible with the investigational device due to excessive occlusive disease or small size not amenable to stent graft placement.
5. Unsuitable distal iliac arterial fixation site and anatomy:

   1. Common iliac artery fixation site diameter measured outer wall to outer wall on a section image (CT)\< 8.0 mm with inability to perform surgical conduit.
   2. Iliac artery diameter measured outer wall to outer wall on a sectional image (CT) \> 21 mm at distal fixation site, with inability to perform open internal iliac artery revascularization or iliac branch stent graft or custom iliac extension with fenestration.
   3. Iliac artery distal fixation site \<10 mm in length.
   4. Inability to preserve at least one hypogastric artery.

For patients in the type I-III TAAA cohort, the intended use criteria are the same for both the fenestrated/branched CMD vs the off-the-shelf device. The CMD will preferably be used, unless an urgent repair is indicated or the waiting period for design or manufacturing of the CMD is considered unacceptable.

Additional anatomical inclusion criteria for aortic arch devices

1. Proximal aortic fixation zone:

   1. Native aorta or surgical graft
   2. Diameter: 20-42mm
   3. Proximal neck length ≥ 20mm
   4. Ascending aortic length ≥50mm
   5. Must occur distal to coronary arteries and any coronary artery bypass grafts that are considered patent and necessary for proper cardiac perfusion
2. Distal aortic fixation zone:

   1. Native aorta or surgical graft
   2. Diameter: 20-42mm
   3. Distal neck length ≥20mm
   4. Distal fixation will be obtained with stent-grafts in a staged repair
3. Supra-aortic trunk (brachiocephalic) vessels

   1. The arch branch device will typically have two or three branches with additional modifications to the design that allows for a single branch or combination of branch and scallop if a customized version is required. An extra-anatomic bypass graft may be done in conjunction (or in a staged fashion) with the procedure, as required. For the two-branch design, the vessels most commonly incorporated will be the innominate artery and left common carotid artery. However, the innominate artery may be coupled with the left subclavian artery in the setting of a bovine arch whereby the flow to the left carotid would come from a left subclavian to carotid bypass. Similarly, the left carotid and subclavian artery may be branched, or simply one vessel branched should specific anatomic limitations exist. In such a situation, multiple extra-anatomic bypasses may be necessary. A design with a single subclavian retrograde branch and scallop to the left carotid artery may be used to extent the landing zone to Zone 1. Finally, a design with two antegrade inner branches for the innominate and left common carotid, and one retrograde inner branch for the left subclavian artery may be used in select cases. Thus, the inclusion criteria are defined for each artery, yet any combination of arteries may be used for a repair.

   i. Innominate artery

1. Native vessel or surgical graft

2. Diameter: 8-22mm

3. Length of sealing zone ≥10mm

4. Acceptable tortuosity

ii. Left (or right) common carotid artery

1. Native vessel or surgical graft
2. Diameter 6-16mm
3. Length of sealing zone ≥10mm
4. Acceptable tortuosity

iii. Left (or right) subclavian artery

1. Native vessel or surgical graft
2. Diameter: 5-20mm
3. Length of sealing zone ≥10mm
4. Acceptable tortuosity

4. In the setting of an aortic dissection the following criteria must exist:

1. Access into the true lumen from the groin and at least one supra-aortic trunk vessel
2. A sealing zone in the target aorta (or surgical graft) that is proximal to the primary dissection, such that a stent-graft would be anticipated to seal off the dissection lumen
3. A sealing zone in the target supra-aortic trunk vessels that is distal to the dissection, anticipated to seal off the dissection lumen, or surgically created
4. A true lumen size large enough to deploy the device and still gain access into the target branches

   5. In the setting of more distal disease, the repair may be coupled with a thoracoabdominal branched device, infrarenal device, and/or internal iliac branch device.

   6. Iliac anatomy must allow for the delivery of the arch branch device which is loaded within a 20F-24F sheath. Conduits to the iliac vessels or aorta may be used if deemed necessary.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Evaluate safety endovascular treatment of juxtarenal, suprarenal, thoracoabdominal and arch aortic aneurysms using fenestrated/branched investigational devices.
timeFrame: 30 days
measure: Evaluate effectiveness endovascular treatment of juxtarenal, suprarenal, thoracoabdominal and arch aortic aneurysms using fenestrated/branched investigational devices.
timeFrame: 12-months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Rate of Grafts deployed at intended site with successful and patent stenting of target vessels (technical success)
timeFrame: 30 days
measure: Number of Major adverse events
timeFrame: 5 years
measure: Number of participants with adverse events from the use of bare metal stents as a measure of safety
timeFrame: 5 years
Other outcomes:
measure: Rate of complications not considered as major (Secondary safety endpoints)
timeFrame: 30 days
measure: Rate of successful procedures and treatment in terms of device integrity (Secondary effectiveness endpoints)
timeFrame: 5 years
measure: Number of participants with adverse events from radiation exposure as a measure of tolerability.
timeFrame: 5 years
measure: Rate of major adverse events in patients treated with low profile devices (Safety for low profile devices)
timeFrame: 5 years
measure: Rate of procedures with successful access of aneurysm site and deployment of low profile devices with patent stenting of target vessels (Effectiveness for low profile devices)
timeFrame: 5 years
Locations:
city: Dallas
country: United States
facility: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
state: Texas
Study officials:
References:
citation: Timaran LI, Timaran CH, Scott CK, Soto-Gonzalez M, Timaran-Montenegro DE, Guild JB, Kirkwood ML. Dual fluoroscopy with live-image digital zooming significantly reduces patient and operating staff radiation during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):601-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 May 27.
citation: Timaran DE, Knowles M, Ali T, Timaran CH. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair among octogenarians at high and standard risk for open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):354-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.064. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
citation: Timaran DE, Soto M, Knowles M, Modrall JG, Rectenwald JE, Timaran CH. Safety and effectiveness of total percutaneous access for fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.444. Epub 2016 May 27.