Clinical trial NCT03473899: Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Acute Hamstring Muscle Complex Injury Type 3b in Athletes
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Single Centre Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of rESWT Combined With a Specific Rehabilitation Program for Acute Hamstring Muscle Complex Injury Type 3b in Athletes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Athletic Injuries
Lead sponsor: Kinef Kinesiología Deportiva
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
First posted: 2018-03-22
Enrollment: 40
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 35
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study tests the hypothesis that the combination of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy performed with the Swiss DolorClast device (Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland) and a specific rehabilitation program (hereafter, "rESWT + RP") is effective and safe in treatment of acute hamstring muscle complex injury Type 3b, and is statistically significantly more effective than the combination of sham-rESWT and RP (hereafter, "sham-rESWT + RP").

Detailed description: Acute injuries of the hamstring muscle complex (HMC) are frequently observed in various sports disciplines both in elite and recreational sport, and are the most common injury in soccer. Despite intensive research into prevention and management of acute HMC injury during the last decade epidemiological data show no decline in injury and re-injury rates. In this regard a recent study prospectively observed 374 Danish elite soccer players during a 12-month period and registered 46 first-time and eight recurrent HMC injuries (incidence rates: 12.3% \[first-time injuries\] and 2% \[recurrent injuries\]). Statistically significantly more players experienced a first-time acute HMC injury during a match than during training. Moreover, among 32 players who suffered from acute HMC injury in a period of 12 months before the study, eight players incurred an injury that fulfilled the criteria for a recurrent injury (incidence: 25%). Approximately two thirds of the first-time injuries were categorized as moderate, with time to return to play between 8 to 28 days.

Anatomical and functional aspects of the HMC predispose it to injury, including the fact that the muscles cross two joints and undergo eccentric contraction during the gait and running cycle.

Acute HMC injury typically occurs through an eccentric mechanism at the terminal stages of the swing phase of running. The long head of the biceps femoris (LHBF) muscle is most commonly affected, and within the LHBF muscle, the proximal myotendinous junction and proximal locations are most commonly affected.

The diagnosis of acute HMC injury is based on the presence of acute-onset pain in the posterior thigh, and presence of the triad of pain on contraction, stretching and palpation. Imaging has a role in confirming the site of injury and characterizing its extent, providing some prognostic information and helping plan treatment. In this regard both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) have been shown to be effective for identification of hamstring strains and tendinopathy. Both MRI and US provide detailed information about the HMC with respect to localization and characterization of injury. Several clinical, MRI and US determinants were established that are associated with a longer recovery time in nonoperative management of acute HMC injury. However, it is important to realize that for an individual HMC injury none of these MRI and US determinants show a direct correlation with the time to return to play. Accordingly, the prognosis of HMC injuries should not be guided by imaging findings alone.

Precise classification of acute HMC injury has important implications for treatment and prognosis (i.e., time to return to play), as outlined in detail below. There are anatomical differences between a Type 3a injury (minor partial muscle tear ≤ 5 mm; intrafascicle/bundle-tear) and a Type 3b injury (moderate partial muscle tear \> 5 mm; interfascicle/bundle-tear).

Acute HMC injuries Type 4 (i.e., subtotal or complete muscle tear or tendinous avulsion) require early surgical repair. However, acute HMC injuries Type IV are rare.

The treatment of choice of acute HMC injuries Type 3a and 3b is a progressive physiotherapeutic exercise programme. Besides this, there is currently only insufficient scientific evidence to support other treatment methods, including local infiltrations. In particular, injections of platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) showed no effect when compared to control.

It is of note that another study that was published very recently in the The New England Journal of Medicine demonstrated the negative clinical consequences of protracted immobilization after an acute muscle injury Type 3b in recreational sports. Starting rehabilitation two days after injury rather than waiting for nine days shortened the interval from injury to pain-free recovery and the time to return to play by approximately three weeks without any significant increase in the risk of reinjury. The authors of this study concluded that the observed difference supports the importance of early loading of injured musculotendinous tissue.

Acute muscle injuries Type 3a and 3b have different time frames for recovery and return to play, with optimal treatment between 10 and 14 days in case of Type 3a and on average approximately six weeks in case of Type 3b. However, particularly in case of acute HMC injury Type 3b there is considerable interindividual variability in the time frame for return to play.

Most importantly, particularly the high reinjury rate of acute HMC injury suggests that commonly utilized rehabilitation programs may be inadequate at resolving possible muscular weakness, reduced tissue extensibility, and/or altered movement patterns associated with the injury. Accordingly, there is need for developing innovative treatment options particularly for acute HMC injury Type 3b.

Very recently it was demonstrated that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) may accelerate regeneration after acute skeletal muscle injury. The use of extracorporeal shock waves in medicine was first reported over 30 years ago as a treatment for kidney stones, and is commonly referred to as 'extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy', or 'ESWL'. Extracorporeal shock waves are also used as a treatment for musculoskeletal conditions such as plantar heel pain and boney non-union, and is commonly referred to as 'extracorporeal shock wave therapy' (ESWT) to differentiate from ESWL.

There are three different types of extracorporeal shock waves that could be used in ESWT for acute HMC injury Type 3b, focused, defocused and radial, and several modes of operation of focused, defocused and radial extracorporeal shock wave generators.

To our knowledge randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing efficacy and safety of rESWT for acute HMC injury Type 3b have not yet been published. In contrast, rESWT has become an established treatment modality for various musculoskeletal conditions such as calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder, tennis elbow and plantar fasciopathy, to mention only a few. Among the 44 RCTs on rESWT currently listed in the PEDro database (status of September 09, 2017), 29 (66%) were performed with the rESWT device Swiss DolorClast (Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland).

The investigators of the present study have extensive practical experience with rESWT for various musculoskeletal conditions using the Swiss DolorClast. Most importantly, all of us have already gained practical experience with rESWT for acute HMC injury Type 3b in athletes. One of our most prominent patients was a professional soccer player at a European top club (regularly playing in the UEFA Champions League) who incurred a HMC injury Type 3b and returned to play (full 90-min match with his national team) 35 days later. In the aforementioned studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine the cumulative probability of resumptions of sports activity on day 35 after acute HMC injury Type 3b in professional soccer players or recreational athletes was only respectively 20% or 5% after treatment with a rehabilitation program.

Considering the limited evidence of efficacy and safety of rESWT for acute HMC injury Type 3b, further research is needed to support the use of rESWT for this condition. Taking into account the proven efficacy and safety of rESWT using the Swiss DolorClast for treating musculoskeletal conditions, the widespread use of the Swiss DolorClast based on its proven efficacy and safety, and our own very promising pilot data of rESWT using the Swiss DolorClast for treating acute HMC injury Type 3b in athletes it is reasonable to hypothesize that (i) the combination of rESWT and a specific rehabilitation program is effective and safe in treatment of acute HMC injury Type 3b, (ii) this combination therapy is statistically significantly more effective than the same specific rehabilitation program alone, and (iii) this combination therapy will gain widespread acceptance as soon as effectiveness and safety will be demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial. This is the main purpose of the proposed study.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults (both male and female) with clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute HMC injury Type 3b
* Age range: between 18 and 35 years
* Physical conditions for rehabilitation (i.e., no surgery required)
* Willingness of the patient to participate in the study, and written informed consent signed and personally dated by the patient
* No contraindications for rESWT

Exclusion Criteria:

* Children and teenagers below the age of 18
* Adults aged \>35 years old
* Patients with clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute HMC injury Type 3b who got injured more than seven days before potential enrollment into this study
* Patients with clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute HMC injury Type 3A or Type 4
* Bilateral acute HMC injury (Types 3A, 3B or 4)
* Proven or suspected HMC injury (Types 3A, 3B or 4) of the same lower limb in the time period of six months before potential enrollment into this study
* Muscle injury caused by external impact on the back of the affected thigh
* Surgery on the affected lower limb in the time period of one year before potential enrollment into this study
* Acute or chronic lumbar pathology (because some cases of thigh pain may relate to spinal pathology)
* No willingness of the patient to participate in this study, and/or written informed consent not signed and not personally dated by the patient
* Contraindications of rESWT, i.e., treatment of pregnant patients, treatment of patients with blood-clotting disorders (including local thrombosis), treatment of patients treated with oral anticoagulants, treatment of patients with local bacterial and/or viral infections/inflammations, treatment of patients with local tumors, and treatment of patients treated with local corticosteroid applications in the time period of six weeks before the first rESWT session (if applicable).

Primary outcomes:
measure: Individual time (days) necessary to return to play.
timeFrame: From date of randomization until the date of return to play, up to six months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Individual patient's satisfaction
timeFrame: Six months after randomization
measure: Presence or absence of re-injury
timeFrame: From date of randomization up to six months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Buenos Aires
country: Argentina
facility: KinEf Kinesiología Deportiva
state: Caba
Study officials:
affiliation: Kinef Kinesiología Deportiva
name: Javier Crupnik, PT
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Crupnik J, Silveti S, Wajnstein N, Rolon A, Vollhardt A, Stiller P, Schmitz C. Is radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with a specific rehabilitation program (rESWT + RP) more effective than sham-rESWT + RP for acute hamstring muscle complex injury type 3b in athletes? Study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled single centre trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jul 23;14(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1283-x.