Clinical trial NCT01559454: Buprenorphine and Methadone for Opioid-dependent Chronic Back Pain Patients
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Buprenorphine and Methadone for Treatment in Opioid Dependent Chronic Back Pain Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Low Back Pain
Keywords: chronic pain
opioid dependence
methadone
buprenorphine
substance use disorder
Lead sponsor: State University of New York at Buffalo
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2012-03-21
Enrollment: 19
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Chronic pain patients are treated with prescription opioids and many exhibit opioid addiction. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines to better manage patients with chronic pain and coexistent opioid addiction. This study compares 6-months buprenorphine and methadone treatment in these patients. The investigators hypothesize that both buprenorphine and methadone treatment will reduce pain and addiction behaviors and increase functioning in these patients.

Detailed description: Chronic non-malignant pain (i.e. pain unrelated to cancer that persists beyond the usual course of disease or injury) is a major concern in the United States. Opioids are the most commonly prescribed medication to treat patients with chronic non-malignant pain. However, in one systematic review of chronic low back pain, the authors note that, although clinical trials suggest that opioids are effective for short-term use (≤ 16 weeks), the effectiveness of long-term opioids (\> 16 weeks) for pain relief and improved physical functioning is less clear.

Five to 31 percent of chronic back pain patients prescribed long-term opioids show aberrant drug-taking behaviors. Many develop tolerance and withdrawal, 43% of these patients exhibit opioid addiction. Therefore, patients with chronic pain and a co-occurring opioid addiction present a clinical challenge. In such cases, referral to addiction experts is recommended, but specialized treatment is currently based on expert opinion and observational studies.

The expert recommendation is detoxification followed by treatment with methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone, or non-opioid analgesics in conjunction with behavioral counseling. Discontinuing short-acting opioid medications increases pain and will make it difficult for these patients to abstain from opioids due to the severity of pain. However, continuing these opioid medications worsens their addiction and renders opioids ineffective in the treatment of pain. Research is needed to compare the various medication-assisted treatments.

Long-acting opioids (e.g., methadone, buprenorphine) are used to replace treatment with short-acting opioids (e.g., hydrocodone, oxycodone). Methadone is a full mu-opioid-receptor agonist that can be effective in treating pain. Two small studies suggest that treatment of patients with chronic pain and co-occurring substance use disorder with methadone and adjunctive pain management therapy is superior to non-opioid treatment protocols. Despite the demonstration that methadone can be effective as both an analgesic and for opioid addiction treatment, it possesses side effects (e.g, constipation) and serious adverse events (e.g, respiratory depression, risk of overdose) that limit its use, making physicians reluctant to prescribe methadone.

Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, is an alternative to methadone for treatment of opioid addiction, has a safety profile superior to methadone, and possesses analgesic properties. For outpatient use, buprenorphine is combined with naloxone (BUP/NLX) to reduce the potential for abuse (i.e., IV administration). When given to those who abuse prescription opioids BUP/NLX possesses better treatment outcomes than those who abuse heroin. In one uncontrolled case series of 95 participants, Malinoff and his colleagues concluded that the effectiveness in the treatment of opioid dependence, in providing analgesia, and the low abuse liability make BUP/NLX a potentially useful treatment for patients with chronic pain and co-occurring opioid addiction. In a randomized controlled trial by Blondell et al. (2010), treatment with BUP/NLX was superior to the abstinence-oriented approach in regards to treatment retention in patients with chronic pain and co-existent opioid addiction. However, there has not been a randomized clinical trial comparing BUP/NLX with methadone maintenance in chronic pain patients with opioid addiction. Preliminary data suggest that both 6-months BUP/NLX and methadone treatment results analgesia, but methadone treatment results in better addiction outcomes. The present study is designed to determine the complexity of recovery outcomes (e.g., functioning, mental health) in chronic pain patients. Clinicians need evidence-based guidelines to more effectively manage patients who have both chronic pain and evidence of opioid misuse or addiction behaviors.

In this study, we plan to investigate whether patients treated with BUP/NLX and usual care will have improved clinical outcomes as those provided with methadone treatment and usual care. Specifically, we propose to give 63 patients BUP/NLX therapy for 6 months (experimental group) and 63 patients methadone therapy over 6 (active comparator). We hypothesize that patients given BUP/NLX treatment will have similar outcomes as those receiving methadone maintenance with respect to functioning, mental health, pain level, and treatment retention.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. have a well-documented chronic pain disorder due to past back surgery,
2. have a chronic back pain syndrome,
3. have evidence of opioid addiction,
4. prior attempt at abstinence-oriented treatment documented by the referring physician,
5. be able to understand spoken and written English,
6. reside in Erie or Niagara counties,
7. have health insurance or other ability to pay for treatment with the approval from patient's primary physician;
8. have no prior history of methadone or BUP/NLX maintenance treatment since the last surgery,
9. not be a member of a vulnerable population, including prisoners

Exclusion Criteria:

1. homeless, or any patient without a "locator" (no means to participate in the follow-up data collection interviews by phone),
2. inability to give consent,
3. those with major co-occurring psychiatric disorders,
4. EKG showing prolonged QT and/or previous cardiac issues,
5. are taking a medication that is contraindicated with methadone,
6. medically unstable,
7. urine positive for cocaine at initial visit,
8. pregnant women

Primary outcomes:
measure: Analgesia
timeFrame: 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Illicit Drug Use
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Cravings
timeFrame: at 6 months
measure: Functioning
timeFrame: at 6 months
measure: Depression
timeFrame: at 6 months
measure: Treatment Retention
timeFrame: 6 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Amherst
country: United States
facility: UB/MD Family Medicine, Inc.
state: New York
Study officials:
affiliation: University at Buffalo
name: Rachel A Rizzo, MPH
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Neumann AM, Blondell RD, Jaanimagi U, Giambrone AK, Homish GG, Lozano JR, Kowalik U, Azadfard M. A preliminary study comparing methadone and buprenorphine in patients with chronic pain and coexistent opioid addiction. J Addict Dis. 2013;32(1):68-78. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2012.759872.
citation: Nielsen S, Tse WC, Larance B. Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9(9):CD011117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011117.pub3.
citation: Neumann AM, Blondell RD, Hoopsick RA, Homish GG. Randomized clinical trial comparing buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone for the treatment of patients with failed back surgery syndrome and opioid addiction. J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):33-41. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2019.1690929. Epub 2019 Nov 27.