Clinical trial NCT06443047: Suturing Through-the-scope System Used for Prophylactic Closure of Colonic Post-ESD Defects
Official title: Suturing Through-the-scope System Used for Prophylactic Closure of Colonic Post-ESD Defects: A Randomized Trial vs Conventional Clips That it Highlights the Importance of Suturing in Promoting Healing and Closure of the Colonic ESD Defects
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Precancerous Lesion of Colon
Keywords: precancerous colorectal lesions
Lead sponsor: Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-06-05
Enrollment: 66
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The goal of this study is to perform a randomized trial to compare a new through-the-scope suturing system and conventional clips for closure of defect after ESD for 30-60 mm colonic polyps. More precisely, the hypothesis posits that the new through-the-scope suturing system can achieve higher complete closure rates in a shorter time in comparison to conventional clips.

Considering an α risk set at 5%, a power set at 80%, given an expected complete resection rate of 70% in the control group and of 95% in the experimental group, 33 patients in each group are required. Thus, the investigators will enroll 66 subjects
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The goal of this study is to perform a randomized trial to compare a new through-the-scope suturing system and conventional clips for closure of defect after ESD for 30-60 mm colonic polyps. More precisely, the hypothesis posits that the new through-the-scope suturing system can achieve higher complete closure rates in a shorter time in comparison to conventional clips.

Detailed description: Large superficial colonic polyps are increasingly detected thanks to colorectal cancer screening programs worldwide. ESD is the technique which provides a high-quality resection of these large polyps.

Nevertheless, several adverse events affect ESD, especially in the colon. They could be life-threatening, call for or prolong the hospitalization, require blood transfusion, additional endoscopic or surgical procedures and increase costs.

Thus, preventing these adverse events is an important clinical and medico-economic objective. Endoscopic closure of post-ESD defects could reduce this risk. However, closing these large defects with conventional clips can be difficult, unsuccessful and prolong the duration of the whole procedure. A new trough-the-scope suturing system could successfully provide a complete endoscopic closure of post-ESD defects in the colon in a reasonable time.

Expected benefits are a decrease of morbidity and costs related to colonic ESD procedure

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient suffering from 30-60 mm colonic polyps with indication of ESD
* Male or female patients aged \> 18 years' old
* Patients able to fill in questionnaires written in Italian

Exclusion Criteria:

* Failure of endoscopic resection
* Suspicion of deep submucosal cancer by analysis of pit pattern (KUDO Vn)
* Polyp involving the appendix deeply (type 2 or 3 according to Toyonaga classification)
* Polyp inside the ileo-cecal valvula.
* Rectal lesions

Primary outcomes:
measure: Compare the proportion of complete closure between the two groups
timeFrame: Intra-procedural
Secondary outcomes:
measure: duration of the closure procedure
timeFrame: up to 2 hours
Other outcomes:
measure: Proportion of post-polypectomy syndrome
timeFrame: 1 week
measure: Proportion of clinically significant delayed bleeding
timeFrame: 1 month
measure: Cost-effectiveness ratio
timeFrame: 1 month
measure: Length of hospitalization
timeFrame: up to 1 week
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
name: Alessandro Repici, Prof.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, Lorenzoni V, Cabasag CJ, Laversanne M, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Murphy N, Bray F. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
citation: Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):683-691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
citation: Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
citation: Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
citation: Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, Inamura K, Kim SA, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Ogino S, Chan AT. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1095-105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301969.
citation: Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T, Rosch T, Lepilliez V, Chaussade S, Rivory J, Legros R, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Rostain F, Barret M, Albouys J, Belle A, Labrunie A, Preux PM, Lepetit H, Dahan M, Ponchon T, Crepin S, Marais L, Magne J, Pioche M. Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):29-38. doi: 10.7326/M23-1812. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
citation: Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N, Galloro G, Manta R, Cirocchi R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/2050640615585470. Epub 2015 May 5.
citation: Liu M, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhu H, Xu H. Effect of prophylactic closure on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;35(11):1869-1877. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15148. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
citation: Dong L, Zhu W, Zhang X, Xie X. Does Prophylactic Closure Improve Outcomes After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Feb 1;34(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001248.
citation: Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law RJ, Elias PA, Pellise M, Wallace MB, Mackenzie TA, Rex DK. Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):977-984.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
citation: Kobara H, Tada N, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Masaki T. Clinical and technical outcomes of endoscopic closure of postendoscopic submucosal dissection defects: Literature review over one decade. Dig Endosc. 2023 Jan;35(2):216-231. doi: 10.1111/den.14397. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
citation: Farha J, Ramberan H, Aihara H, Zhang LY, Mehta A, Hage C, Schlachterman A, Kumar A, Shinn B, Canakis A, Kim RE, D'Souza LS, Buscaglia JM, Storm AC, Samarasena J, Chang K, Friedland S, Draganov PV, Qumseya BJ, Jawaid S, Othman MO, Hasan MK, Yang D, Khashab MA, Ngamruengphong S; ESD-Closure working group. A novel through-the-scope helix tack-and-suture device for mucosal defect closure following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2023 Jun;55(6):571-577. doi: 10.1055/a-1970-5528. Epub 2022 Nov 2.