Clinical trial NCT04220619: RescueTEE for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest (ReTEECA Trial)
Official title: Rescue Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Guidance of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Versus Conventional ACLS
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Echocardiography, Transesophageal
In-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest
Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation
ACLS
Image Guided ACLS
Keywords: Cardiac Arrest
Transesophageal Echocardiography
CPR
Image Guided CPR
Conventional CPR
RescueTEE
Lead sponsor: University of Pennsylvania
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-01-07
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Convenience Sampled, Prospective Arm1: Conventional ACLS Arm2: Image Guided RescueTEE ACLS
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: ReTEECA Trial. Rescue TransEsophageal Echocardiography for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

This trial is aimed at studying the utility and interventional outcomes of rescue transesophageal echocardiography (RescueTEE) to aid in diagnosis, change in management, and outcomes during CPR by using a point of care RescueTEE protocol in the evaluation of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). This is an interventional prospective convenience sampled partially blinded phase II clinical trial with primary outcomes of survival to hospital discharge (SHD) with RescueTEE image guided ACLS versus conventional ACLS.

Detailed description: This is a Phase II, single center, partially blinded, prospective, safety and efficacy pragmatic clinical trial comparing rescue transesophageal image guided ACLS versus conventional ACLS in adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The ReTEECA Trial will use a recently published and validated focused 5-view RescueTEE protocol to evaluate patients with IHCA to obtain diagnostic and therapeutic information to aid in medical decision-making in a rapid fashion for those patients who are experiencing in-hospital arrest.1 Patients will be resuscitated with one of the following protocols:

1. Conventional ACLS with RescueTEE during IHCA. The TEE probe will be brought to the IHCA code call and placed within 10 minutes of cardiac arrest after a secured airway has been obtained. The RescueTEE team led by a physician (RescueTEE MD) and will use a predefined protocol for diagnosis and if needed intervention at the discretion of the treating physician (Code Team MD). If an intervention is performed this will be done at the discretion of the treating physician as a pragmatic and clinically evidenced intervention. The TEE probe will remain indwelling for 30 minutes or until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) whichever is earlier.
2. Conventional ACLS without RescueTEE during IHCA. Conventional ACLS will be driven by national American Heart Association (AHA) standardized protocols by the treating physician (Code Team MD) and code team members.

Management of the patient and ACLS will be driven pragmatically and by the local code team (Code Team MD) and not the RescueTEE team. Advice and diagnostic evidence, as able, from the RescueTEE will be provided by the RescueTEE team (RescueTEE MD). Post ROSC care will be at the discretion of the ICU team (ICU MD). The indications for using a validated published RescueTEE protocol is to study the outcome effects of an intervention that is publicly available and apply this in a real-world clinical scenario as a prospective trial.

Based on our preliminary results we hypothesize that routine use of RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA will expedite diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and facilitate and identify reversible causes and significantly improve survival to hospital discharge and in turn functional survival compared to standard ACLS.

Given the poor clinical outcomes of IHCA it is imperative to conduct research in this area. RescueTEE provides an avenue to help diagnose and clinically intervene on pathology during the intra-arrest period. This directly impacts the disease process, the patient, and will likely change ACLS management. There are studies that have been conducted retrospectively and prospectively that highlight the benefits of image guidance during ACLS; however, no randomized clinical trial documenting the safety and efficacy of RescueTEE has been conducted. Many institutions and hospital systems are now using RescueTEE during ACLS; however, we do not know the impact that this has had directly on survival and complications. Like many areas in medicine, a prospective clinical trial can help elucidate the direct patient benefits in terms of survival. This will offer future researchers a platform to conduct further studies on image guidance during ACLS. A prospective clinical trial is necessary to transform national guidelines and help guide evidence-based practice throughout the country.

ReTEECA Trial Hypothesis: Based on our preliminary results we hypothesize that routine use of RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA will expedite diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and facilitate and identify reversible causes and significantly improve survival to hospital discharge and in turn functional survival compared to standard ACLS.

ReTEECA Trial: We propose a Phase II, single center, partially blinded, intention to treat, safety and efficacy clinical trial to assess the results of routine RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA compared with standard ACLS. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care has the patient population, experience, expertise, and infrastructure to execute the proposed study.

Specific Aims: The goal of the study will be to use intra-arrest RescueTEE diagnostic imaging to guide the code leader in clinical management and decision-making and to therefore decrease IHCA mortality rates. Additionally, we will assess if RescueTEE guidance of intra-arrest therapies or interventions can significantly improve functionally favorable outcomes.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* All patients greater than 18 years of age;
* Intubated or permanent tracheostomy in situ;
* Experiencing extreme hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest and TTE is difficult or contraindicated
* Rapid response, Code calls, ECMO stat evaluation
* In-patients

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unsecured airway
* On-going aspiration
* History of tracheoesophageal injury
* History of tracheoesophageal fistula
* Esophagectomy
* Active upper GI bleeding
* Esophageal varices
* Ongoing hemoptysis
* Technically challenging TEE placement due to location of code - Small room, intrusive to the code team, airway trauma

Primary outcomes:
measure: Survival
timeFrame: 3 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Number of patients surviving to End of ACLS
timeFrame: 1 hour
measure: Number of patients surviving to ICU discharge
timeFrame: Variable
measure: Number of patients surviving to 30 days
timeFrame: 30 days
measure: Neurologically Intact Survival at 3 months
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Neurologically Intact Survival at 6 months
timeFrame: 6 months
Other outcomes:
measure: Optimal Hand Positioning
timeFrame: 1 hour
measure: Feasibility and safety of TEE probe insertion during CPR
timeFrame: 10 minutes
measure: Image quality
timeFrame: 1 hour
measure: Diagnoses of pathology in image guided ACLS
timeFrame: 1 hour
measure: Interventional and therapeutic support during image guided ACLS
timeFrame: 1 hour
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
name: Jacob Gutsche, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
name: Asad A Usman, MD, MPH
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble V, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown S, Caffery T, Douglass E, Fraser J, Haines C, Lam S, Lanspa M, Lewis M, Liebmann O, Limkakeng A, Lopez F, Platz E, Mendoza M, Minnigan H, Moore C, Novik J, Rang L, Scruggs W, Raio C. A retrospective study of pulseless electrical activity, bedside ultrasound identifies interventions during resuscitation associated with improved survival to hospital admission. A REASON Study. Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
citation: Markin NW, Gmelch BS, Griffee MJ, Holmberg TJ, Morgan DE, Zimmerman JM. A review of 364 perioperative rescue echocardiograms: findings of an anesthesiologist-staffed perioperative echocardiography service. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):82-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
citation: Min JK, Spencer KT, Furlong KT, DeCara JM, Sugeng L, Ward RP, Lang RM. Clinical features of complications from transesophageal echocardiography: a single-center case series of 10,000 consecutive examinations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Sep;18(9):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.01.034.
citation: Staudt GE, Shelton K. Development of a Rescue Echocardiography Protocol for Noncardiac Surgery Patients. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):e37-e40. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003569.
citation: Long B, Alerhand S, Maliel K, Koyfman A. Echocardiography in cardiac arrest: An emergency medicine review. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.031. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
citation: Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble VE, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown SM, Caffery T, Douglass E, Fraser J, Haines C, Lam S, Lanspa M, Lewis M, Liebmann O, Limkakeng A, Lopez F, Platz E, Mendoza M, Minnigan H, Moore C, Novik J, Rang L, Scruggs W, Raio C. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
citation: Arntfield R, Lau V, Landry Y, Priestap F, Ball I. Impact of Critical Care Transesophageal Echocardiography in Medical-Surgical ICU Patients: Characteristics and Results From 274 Consecutive Examinations. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):896-902. doi: 10.1177/0885066618797271. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
citation: Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, Grube E, Hanrath P, Maisch B, Dennig K, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation. 1991 Mar;83(3):817-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.817.
citation: Fair J, Mallin M, Mallemat H, Zimmerman J, Arntfield R, Kessler R, Bailitz J, Blaivas M. Transesophageal Echocardiography: Guidelines for Point-of-Care Applications in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
citation: Shillcutt SK, Markin NW, Montzingo CR, Brakke TR. Use of rapid "rescue" perioperative echocardiography to improve outcomes after hemodynamic instability in noncardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):362-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.029. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
citation: Teran F, Dean AJ, Centeno C, Panebianco NL, Zeidan AJ, Chan W, Abella BS. Evaluation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using transesophageal echocardiography in the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 16.