Clinical trial NCT04431713: Exenatide Once-weekly as a Treatment for Multiple System Atrophy
Official title: An Open Label, Single Site, 48 Week, Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once-weekly in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple System Atrophy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Multiple System Atrophy
Lead sponsor: University College, London
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-06-16
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 30
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Fifty patients with early stage Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) will be recruited and randomised to receive Exenatide injections, or to act as controls in this open label trial. For half of the patients, Exenatide will be given as a once weekly subcutaneous injection in addition to participant's regular medication. All patients will continue to receive standard of care treatment for MSA. Detailed assessments will be made of all patients at baseline and periodically for a total of 48 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the difference in total Uniﬁed Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score (Parts I and II) at 48 weeks comparing Exenatide treated to best medically treated patients (controls). Secondary measures will include adverse event reports, self-completed questionnaires, and blood test results. Aside from these assessments, all patients will continue any regular MSA medications throughout the trial with adjustments made only according to clinical need.

Standard of care treatment for patients on non IMP arm will be dependant on the patients individual symptoms - there is no broad standard treatment for every patient.

Detailed description: Fifty patients with early stage MSA will be recruited and randomised to receive Exenatide injections, or to act as controls in this open label trial.

Once a potential participant has been identified they will receive a patient information leaflet, and will be given a minimum of 24 hours to read this before being recruited on to the trial. Patients will need to be eligible for the trial by meeting the inclusion criteria.

During pre-treatment there will be a screening visit and a baseline visit. Pre-treatment assessments will include: demographics, medical history, family history, any previous genetic tests recorded, previous drug compliance issues recorded, physical examination, neurological examination, 12-lead ECG, routine bloods (FBC, U\&E, LFT, glucose, amylase, HbA1c, PT and APTT), height, weight, vital signs, serum or urine pregnancy tests (for women of childbearing potential), MoCA, BDI-II and Concomitant medications. Patients will then wear a sensor attached to their lower back for a week. They will then return for their baseline visit. At the baseline visit assessments will include: physical exam, neurological exam, lumbar puncture for CSF collection, serum collection, fasting blood tests, vital signs, UMSARS, COMPASS Select, COMPASS Change scale, timed motor tests, The Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, MoCA, BDI-II, Concomitant medication review and adverse event review. Participants will then be randomised to both control arm or trial drug arm and receive the according treatment. The baseline visit will also include a training session for self-administration of IMP.

Patients randomised to receive the trial drug will receive 2mg Exenatide once a week for 48 weeks via subcutaneous injection. Follow up visits will be every 12 weeks and patients will be given a sufficient supply to last them till their next follow up appointment (can be stored in fridge at home). They will also be given a dosing diary to record the time and day of injection administration.

Patients will continue to attend their normal neurology appointments as well as trial specific appointments. Patients will have a telephone call with the research nurse at week 4. Thereafter detailed assessments including Physical and Neurological exam, ECG's, Movement tests Including the Uniﬁed Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (videotaped), concomitant medications review, adverse event review, and blood sampling at baseline and every 12 weeks for a total of 48 weeks. Each patient will also have a Lumbar Puncture at baseline and at their final visit.

The primary endpoint will be the difference in total Uniﬁed Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score (Parts I and II) at 48 weeks comparing Exenatide to best medically treated patients. Secondary measures will include adverse event reports, self-completed questionnaires, and blood test results. Aside from these assessments, all patients will continue any regular MSA medications throughout the trial with adjustments made only according to clinical need.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Participants aged 30-80 years old with a diagnosis of Possible or Probable MSA of the parkinsonian subtype (MSA-P) or cerebellar subtype (MSA-C) according to The Gilman Criteria (Gilman et al. 2008).
* Participants who are less than five years from the time of documented MSA diagnosis or from the time of documented parkinsonian / ataxic neurological condition that later turns out to be MSA.
* Participants who are able to walk at least 10 metres with or without assistance. Participants with an anticipated survival of at least three years in the opinion of the investigator.
* Participants that are willing to adhere to the study drug regimen.
* Participants that are willing and able to perform all protocol-specified assessments and comply with the study visit schedule.
* Females of childbearing potential and male participants with partners of childbearing potential must agree to use an effective method of contraception from the time consent is signed until 10 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Females of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to being randomised.
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
* Subjects who are not able to write may give verbal consent in the presence of at least one witness, and the witness should sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Females who are pregnant, planning pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Women of child-bearing potential who do not practice an acceptable method of birth control. Subjects who meet any of the following criteria which tend to suggest advance disease:

  1. Speech impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 1
  2. Swallowing impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 2
  3. Impairment in ambulation as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 7
  4. Falling more frequently than once per week as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 8. Participants with a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator might preclude safe completion of the study.
* Participants with active malignant neoplasms or history of malignant neoplasm in the last 5 years. Participants with movement disorders other than MSA.
* Concurrent dementia defined by a score lower than 21 on the MoCA.
* Concurrent severe depression defined by a score of ≥30 on the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
* History of deep brain stimulation surgery.
* Participants who have taken any investigational products within 90 days prior to baseline.
* Participants with a BMI \< 18.5.
* Participants with diabetes, end stage renal disease or severely impaired renal function.
* History of clinically significant cardiac disease, pancreatitis and/or alcoholism.
* Participants with severe gastrointestinal disease including gastroparesis.
* Ongoing treatment with sulphonylurea.
* Known allergies to the IMP and excipients of IMP.

Primary outcomes:
measure: To collect data to estimate the effectiveness of Exenatide in modifying disease progression of patients with Multiple System Atrophy
timeFrame: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The proportion of patients with loss of independent ambulation by the end of the study
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The difference in the Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life (MSA QoL) scale
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The difference at week 48 in UMSARS III and IV (The proportion of patients with loss of independent ambulation by the end of the study)
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The difference in anti-parkinsonian or anti-orthostatic hypotension drugs
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The number of falls
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The proportion of patients reaching a score of 3 or more on UMSARS-I items 1 (speech), 2 (swallowing) and 8 (falling)
timeFrame: 48 weeks
measure: The difference at week 48 in clinical global impression (CGI); difference at week 48 in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores
timeFrame: 48 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation trust
Study officials:
References:
citation: Athauda D, Foltynie T. Insulin resistance and Parkinson's disease: A new target for disease modification? Prog Neurobiol. 2016 Oct-Nov;145-146:98-120. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
citation: Athauda D, Foltynie T. The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP) receptor as a therapeutic target in Parkinson's disease: mechanisms of action. Drug Discov Today. 2016 May;21(5):802-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
citation: Athauda D, Gulyani S, Karnati HK, Li Y, Tweedie D, Mustapic M, Chawla S, Chowdhury K, Skene SS, Greig NH, Kapogiannis D, Foltynie T. Utility of Neuronal-Derived Exosomes to Examine Molecular Mechanisms That Affect Motor Function in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Exenatide-PD Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Apr 1;76(4):420-429. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4304.
citation: Athauda D, Maclagan K, Budnik N, Zampedri L, Hibbert S, Skene SS, Chowdhury K, Aviles-Olmos I, Limousin P, Foltynie T. What Effects Might Exenatide have on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(2):247-258. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181329.
citation: Athauda D, Maclagan K, Skene SS, Bajwa-Joseph M, Letchford D, Chowdhury K, Hibbert S, Budnik N, Zampedri L, Dickson J, Li Y, Aviles-Olmos I, Warner TT, Limousin P, Lees AJ, Greig NH, Tebbs S, Foltynie T. Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1664-1675. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31585-4. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
citation: Aviles-Olmos I, Dickson J, Kefalopoulou Z, Djamshidian A, Ell P, Soderlund T, Whitton P, Wyse R, Isaacs T, Lees A, Limousin P, Foltynie T. Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease. J Clin Invest. 2013 Jun;123(6):2730-6. doi: 10.1172/JCI68295.
citation: Aviles-Olmos I, Dickson J, Kefalopoulou Z, Djamshidian A, Kahan J, Ell P, Whitton P, Wyse R, Isaacs T, Lees A, Limousin P, Foltynie T. Motor and cognitive advantages persist 12 months after exenatide exposure in Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(3):337-44. doi: 10.3233/JPD-140364.
citation: Bassil, Fares, Marie-Hélène Canron, Anne Vital, Erwan Bezard, Pierre-Olivier Fernagut, and Wassilios G. Meissner. 2017. "Brain Insulin Resistance in Parkinson's Disease [MDS Abstracts]." Movement Disorders 32 (suppl.
citation: Bassil F, Canron MH, Vital A, Bezard E, Li Y, Greig NH, Gulyani S, Kapogiannis D, Fernagut PO, Meissner WG. Insulin resistance and exendin-4 treatment for multiple system atrophy. Brain. 2017 May 1;140(5):1420-1436. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx044.
citation: Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, Malloy J, Walsh B, Yan P, Wilhelm K, Malone J, Porter LE; DURATION-2 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 7;376(9739):431-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60590-9. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
citation: Blevins T, Pullman J, Malloy J, Yan P, Taylor K, Schulteis C, Trautmann M, Porter L. DURATION-5: exenatide once weekly resulted in greater improvements in glycemic control compared with exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May;96(5):1301-10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2081. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
citation: Consoli A, Formoso G. Potential side effects to GLP-1 agonists: understanding their safety and tolerability. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;14(2):207-18. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.987122. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
citation: Cork SC, Richards JE, Holt MK, Gribble FM, Reimann F, Trapp S. Distribution and characterisation of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor expressing cells in the mouse brain. Mol Metab. 2015 Aug 5;4(10):718-31. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.07.008. eCollection 2015 Oct.
citation: D'Amelio M, Ragonese P, Callari G, Di Benedetto N, Palmeri B, Terruso V, Salemi G, Famoso G, Aridon P, Savettieri G. Diabetes preceding Parkinson's disease onset. A case-control study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Nov;15(9):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
citation: Dodel R, Spottke A, Gerhard A, Reuss A, Reinecker S, Schimke N, Trenkwalder C, Sixel-Doring F, Herting B, Kamm C, Gasser T, Sawires M, Geser F, Kollensperger M, Seppi K, Kloss M, Krause M, Daniels C, Deuschl G, Bottger S, Naumann M, Lipp A, Gruber D, Kupsch A, Du Y, Turkheimer F, Brooks DJ, Klockgether T, Poewe W, Wenning G, Schade-Brittinger C, Oertel WH, Eggert K. Minocycline 1-year therapy in multiple-system-atrophy: effect on clinical symptoms and [(11)C] (R)-PK11195 PET (MEMSA-trial). Mov Disord. 2010 Jan 15;25(1):97-107. doi: 10.1002/mds.22732.
citation: Drucker DJ, Buse JB, Taylor K, Kendall DM, Trautmann M, Zhuang D, Porter L; DURATION-1 Study Group. Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2008 Oct 4;372(9645):1240-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61206-4. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
citation: Egan AG, Blind E, Dunder K, de Graeff PA, Hummer BT, Bourcier T, Rosebraugh C. Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs--FDA and EMA assessment. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 27;370(9):794-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1314078. No abstract available.
citation: Fanciulli A, Wenning GK. Multiple-system atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):249-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1311488. No abstract available.
citation: Fernagut PO, Dehay B, Maillard A, Bezard E, Perez P, Pavy-Le Traon A, Rascol O, Foubert-Samier A, Tison F, Meissner WG. Multiple system atrophy: a prototypical synucleinopathy for disease-modifying therapeutic strategies. Neurobiol Dis. 2014 Jul;67:133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
citation: Fineman MS, Mace KF, Diamant M, Darsow T, Cirincione BB, Booker Porter TK, Kinninger LA, Trautmann ME. Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
citation: Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, Wood NW, Colosimo C, Durr A, Fowler CJ, Kaufmann H, Klockgether T, Lees A, Poewe W, Quinn N, Revesz T, Robertson D, Sandroni P, Seppi K, Vidailhet M. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008 Aug 26;71(9):670-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324625.00404.15.
citation: Greig NH, Tweedie D, Rachmany L, Li Y, Rubovitch V, Schreiber S, Chiang YH, Hoffer BJ, Miller J, Lahiri DK, Sambamurti K, Becker RE, Pick CG. Incretin mimetics as pharmacologic tools to elucidate and as a new drug strategy to treat traumatic brain injury. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Feb;10(1 Suppl):S62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.12.011.
citation: Low PA, Reich SG, Jankovic J, Shults CW, Stern MB, Novak P, Tanner CM, Gilman S, Marshall FJ, Wooten F, Racette B, Chelimsky T, Singer W, Sletten DM, Sandroni P, Mandrekar J. Natural history of multiple system atrophy in the USA: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jul;14(7):710-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00058-7. Epub 2015 May 27.
citation: Low PA, Robertson D, Gilman S, Kaufmann H, Singer W, Biaggioni I, Freeman R, Perlman S, Hauser RA, Cheshire W, Lessig S, Vernino S, Mandrekar J, Dupont WD, Chelimsky T, Galpern WR. Efficacy and safety of rifampicin for multiple system atrophy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70301-6. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
citation: Madsbad S. Review of head-to-head comparisons of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):317-32. doi: 10.1111/dom.12596. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
citation: De Pablo-Fernandez E, Sierra-Hidalgo F, Benito-Leon J, Bermejo-Pareja F. Association between Parkinson's disease and diabetes: Data from NEDICES study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Dec;136(6):732-736. doi: 10.1111/ane.12793. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
citation: Poewe W, Hauser RA, Lang A; ADAGIO Investigators. Effects of rasagiline on the progression of nonmotor scores of the MDS-UPDRS. Mov Disord. 2015 Apr;30(4):589-92. doi: 10.1002/mds.26124. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
citation: Poewe W, Seppi K, Fitzer-Attas CJ, Wenning GK, Gilman S, Low PA, Giladi N, Barone P, Sampaio C, Eyal E, Rascol O; Rasagiline-for-MSA investigators. Efficacy of rasagiline in patients with the parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70288-1. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
citation: Talbot K, Wang HY, Kazi H, Han LY, Bakshi KP, Stucky A, Fuino RL, Kawaguchi KR, Samoyedny AJ, Wilson RS, Arvanitakis Z, Schneider JA, Wolf BA, Bennett DA, Trojanowski JQ, Arnold SE. Demonstrated brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer's disease patients is associated with IGF-1 resistance, IRS-1 dysregulation, and cognitive decline. J Clin Invest. 2012 Apr;122(4):1316-38. doi: 10.1172/JCI59903.
citation: Wenning GK, Tison F, Seppi K, Sampaio C, Diem A, Yekhlef F, Ghorayeb I, Ory F, Galitzky M, Scaravilli T, Bozi M, Colosimo C, Gilman S, Shults CW, Quinn NP, Rascol O, Poewe W; Multiple System Atrophy Study Group. Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS). Mov Disord. 2004 Dec;19(12):1391-402. doi: 10.1002/mds.20255.
citation: Kollensperger M, Stampfer-Kountchev M, Seppi K, Geser F, Frick C, Del Sorbo F, Albanese A, Gurevich T, Giladi N, Djaldetti R, Schrag A, Low PA, Mathias CJ, Poewe W, Wenning GK. Progression of dysautonomia in multiple system atrophy: a prospective study of self-perceived impairment. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Jan;14(1):66-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01554.x.
citation: Wenning GK, Geser F, Krismer F, Seppi K, Duerr S, Boesch S, Kollensperger M, Goebel G, Pfeiffer KP, Barone P, Pellecchia MT, Quinn NP, Koukouni V, Fowler CJ, Schrag A, Mathias CJ, Giladi N, Gurevich T, Dupont E, Ostergaard K, Nilsson CF, Widner H, Oertel W, Eggert KM, Albanese A, del Sorbo F, Tolosa E, Cardozo A, Deuschl G, Hellriegel H, Klockgether T, Dodel R, Sampaio C, Coelho M, Djaldetti R, Melamed E, Gasser T, Kamm C, Meco G, Colosimo C, Rascol O, Meissner WG, Tison F, Poewe W; European Multiple System Atrophy Study Group. The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Mar;12(3):264-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70327-7. Epub 2013 Feb 5.