Clinical trial NCT05367947: In-phase Bilateral Exercises in People With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Official title: Investigation of In-phase Bilateral Exercise Effects on Corticospinal Plasticity in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: a Registered Report Single-case Concurrent Multiple Baseline Design Across Five Subjects
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Multiple Sclerosis
Keywords: transcranial magnetic stimulation
multiple sclerosis
exercise
Lead sponsor: Cyprus University of Technology
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: The Cyprus Foundation for Muscular Dystrophy Research
First posted: 2022-05-10
Enrollment: 5
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 30
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: The study follows a concurrent multiple baseline design across subjects, which involves five people with RRMS that will be managed as five different case studies. The specific design has the advantage to verify the cause-effect inference clearly by the staggered duration through separate baseline phases
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with changes of the corticospinal tract integrity, which is quantified by means of corticospinal plasticity. Several factors, such as exercise and interlimb coordination can influence such corticospinal plasticity. Previous work in healthy and in stroke participants showed that the greatest improvement of corticospinal plasticity occurred during in-phase bilateral arm exercises. Here, the investigators propose a concurrent multiple baseline design study which has the advantage to verify the cause-effect inference by the staggered duration through separate baseline phases. The proposed study includes five people with RRMS, who will follow an intervention protocol which includes in-phase bilateral movements of the upper limbs, adapted to different sports activities and to functional training. The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of in-phase bilateral exercises on corticospinal plasticity and on clinical measures, using transcranial magnetic stimulation and standardized clinical assessment. To meet quality standards, the present study has been designed and will be conducted according to the "What Works Clearinghouse" criteria for single case studies.

Detailed description: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most common type of multiple sclerosis characterized by periods of relapses and generating various motor symptoms. These symptoms are associated with the corticospinal tract integrity neuroplasticity. The corticospinal tract is one of the major motor descending pathways providing voluntary motor function in humans. The neuroplasticity of the corticospinal tract, as defined by changes in neuron structure or function detected either directly from measures of individual neurons or inferred from measures taken across populations of neurons, is an essential factor that predicts clinical recovery in the post-relapse stage of people with RRMS. Corticospinal plasticity can be probed using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and characterized via certain TMS-specific neurophysiological measures. Corticospinal plasticity is exercise-dependent and influenced by various factors, such as aerobic exercise, resistance training, as well as interlimb coordination. Previous studies that assessed corticospinal plasticity using TMS in healthy participants and in chronic stroke survivors, reported that interlimb coordination and especially in-phase bilateral movement has the strongest effect on corticospinal plasticity.

Despite the broad literature on the effects of different types of exercises on the neuroplasticity in people with RRMS, it is unclear whether in-phase bilateral exercises can promote motor related neuroplastic changes in RRMS. In light of evidence that people with RRMS have bilateral cortical lesions, which cause bilateral changes of corticospinal tract integrity, these findings raise the question about the effects of in-phase bilateral exercises on corticospinal plasticity. Such effects would provide strong evidence about whether exercise, in particular in-phase bilateral exercise, can influence the corticospinal plasticity in RRMS.

The aim of this concurrent multiple baseline design study is to investigate the effects of in-phase bilateral exercises on corticospinal plasticity and on clinical measures using TMS and standardized clinical assessment, in five people with RRMS. The intervention protocol will last for 12 consecutive weeks (30-60 minutes /session x 3 sessions/week) and include in-phase bilateral movements of the upper limbs, adapted to different sports activities and to functional training.

To define functional relation between the intervention and the results on corticospinal plasticity (i.e., resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential amplitude, latency) and on clinical measures (i.e., balance, gait, bilateral hand dexterity and strength, cognitive function), the investigators will perform a visual analysis followed by multilevel modelling and the single case educational design specific mean difference in order to estimate the magnitude of the effect size across cases.

Visual analysis will conducted first, in order to determine whether there is a functional relationship between the intervention and the outcome measures. During the visual analysis, six features of the research design graphed data will be examined: level, trend, stability, immediacy of the effect, overlap, and consistency. Over the within-phase examination an evaluation of level, trend and stability will be examined. Level will be reported from the mean score of each dependent variable and trend will determine whether the data points are monotonically decreased or increased. Stability will be estimated based on the percentage of data points falling within 15% of the phase median, if this is higher than 80% then we assume that this criterion is met. Additionally, over the between-phase examination an evaluation of overlapping data among baseline and intervention phases, consistency of data patterns and immediacy of effect will be performed. The Percentage of Non-overlapping Data index will be used to quantify the proportion of data points in the intervention phase that do not overlap with the baseline phase and the test statistic will be calculated using the Improvement Rate Difference as an effect size index. Immediacy of the effect will be examined by comparing changes in level between the last three data points of one phase and the three first data points of the next phase. Furthermore, consistency of data patterns involves the observation of the data from all phases within the same condition, with greater consistency expressing greater causal relation. Each feature will be assessed individually and collectively across to all participants and to all phases. Consequently, if the intervention protocol is the sole determinant of improvement, the investigators expect to find indicators of improvement only at the intervention phase.

Secondly, a quantitative analysis methods will conducted so to evaluate the magnitude of the intervention effect, provided there is evidence from the visual analysis. The investigators will perform all neurophysiological and clinical assessments to each participant according to the number of data points during each phase (i.e., baseline, intervention, follow up). In order to estimate the individual-level effect sizes, three different methods will be used, as suggested by 'What Works Clearinghouse', the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d), the standardized mean difference with correction for small sample sizes (Hedges' g) and piecewise regression analysis which does not only reflect the immediate intervention effect, but also the intervention effect across time. Multilevel modelling, which is recommended by the 'What Works Clearinghouse' and the single case educational design, specific mean difference index will be used to estimate the magnitude of the effect across cases and compared to the effect obtained by the single level estimates. All tests will be two sided. Statistical analysis will be performed using the statistical software R (https://www.r-project.org/).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Diagnosed with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
* Expanded Disability Status Scale score between three and five
* Aged between 30 and 70 years
* Relapse within 30 days
* Mini Mental State of Examination score between 24 and 30 (no cognitive impairment)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Metal implants
* History of any disease affecting the central nervous system other than multiple sclerosis
* History of cardiovascular disease
* Mental disorders
* Severe orthopedic disorders
* Pregnancy
* Visual deficit
* Hearing impairments,
* Εpileptic seizures
* Spasticity level on upper or lower limbs more than 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone) according to Modified Ashworth Scale

Primary outcomes:
measure: Corticospinal Plasticity
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
measure: Six Spot Step Test
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
measure: Action Research Arm Test
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
measure: Isometric Dynamometer
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
measure: Symbol Digit Modalities Test
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
measure: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average 35 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Limassol
country: Cyprus
facility: Dimitris Sokratous
Study officials:
affiliation: Cyprus University of Technology
name: Dimitris Sokratous, MS
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Neva JL, Lakhani B, Brown KE, Wadden KP, Mang CS, Ledwell NH, Borich MR, Vavasour IM, Laule C, Traboulsee AL, MacKay AL, Boyd LA. Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
citation: Pascual-Leone A, Tarazona F, Keenan J, Tormos JM, Hamilton R, Catala MD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00095-5.
citation: Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, Forrester LW, Macko RF, Hanley DF, Goldberg AP, Luft A. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Feb;25(2):118-29. doi: 10.1177/1545968310380685. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
citation: Smith AL, Staines WR. Cortical and behavioral adaptations in response to short-term inphase versus antiphase bimanual movement training. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(4):465-77. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2381-5. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
citation: Neva JL, Legon W, Staines WR. Primary motor cortex excitability is modulated with bimanual training. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Apr 18;514(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.075. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
citation: Kratochwill, T. R. Hitchcock, J. Horner, R. H. Levin, J. R. Odom, S. L. Rindskopf, D. M Shadish WR. Single-Case Design Technical Documentation. Work Clear website http//ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf. 2010;(December):2010.
citation: Zhan S, Ottenbacher KJ. Single subject research designs for disability research. Disabil Rehabil. 2001 Jan 15;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280150211202.
citation: Lobo MA, Moeyaert M, Baraldi Cunha A, Babik I. Single-Case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;41(3):187-197. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000187.