Clinical trial NCT04651309: Assessment of Labour Progress by Intrapartum Ultrasound
Official title: Assessment of Labour Progress by Intrapartum Ultrasound: Can it Reduce the Incidence of Chorioamnionitis?
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Pregnancy Related
Fever
Chorioamnionitis
Labor Complication
Lead sponsor: Kaplan Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-12-03
Enrollment: 180
Sex: FEMALE
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Assessment of labor progress via digital exams is considered the standard of care in most delivery rooms. However, this method can be stressful, painful and imprecise and multiple exams increase the risk for chorioamnionitis. Trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS) was found to be an objective noninvasive way to monitor labor progress. The study aim is to investigate whether, in nulliparous women, the use of TPUS during labor can reduce the number of vaginal exams and the incidence of chorioamnionitis.

Detailed description: The prevalence of chorioamnionitis in term deliveries is 1-5% and in preterm deliveries the numbers can be as high as 25%. Most infections are a result of an ascending infection of the normal vaginal flora. Among risk factors are nulliparity, rupture of membranes, an extended duration of labor, multiple vaginal examinations and GBS colonization.

The digital vaginal examination remains to this day the standard method for evaluating the patient's cervical status. However, this method is both highly subjective as well as painful and stressogenic for the patients.

In recent years there has been great progress in the field of translabial/transperineal sonography. There have been several studies which showed that this technique could be as useful as digital examinations in helping clinicians predict the course of labor. Recent studies demonstrate that using transperineal sonography can reduce the perception of pain compared with routine digital vaginal examinations. Even so, there has been little evidence as to whether using perineal ultrasound may also reduce peripartum and puerperal infections and if using sonography and refraining from digital examinations affects the course and duration of labor.

Our objective is to evaluate whether the incidence of chorioamnionitis or fever can be decreased. This goal would hopefully be achieved by assessing the progression of labor using mostly transperineal ultrasound, thus avoiding digital vaginal examination as much as possible.

The study would focus on primigravid women as they are known to be in a higher risk for infection and also other potential risk factors such as GBS carriers and PROM.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Primigravida
* Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks (according to 1st trimester sonography)
* Single fetus •Cephalic presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

o Other known active infection (such as URTI, UTI)

* Women who are taking immunosuppressive therapy
* Women who arrived in active labor and delivered before being assessed by a physician.
* Women with contra-indications for vaginal birth

Primary outcomes:
measure: Fever and infection rates in each of the study arms
timeFrame: From admission to hospital for labor until 2 week post-partum
measure: Number of digital exams in each of the study arms
timeFrame: From admission to hospital until delivery
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Reẖovot
country: Israel
facility: Maya Oberman
Study officials:
affiliation: Kaplan Medical Center
name: Maya Oberman, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Gabbe, Steven G, Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies , Seventh edition. ..2017
citation: Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, Haque K, Weston JA, Hewson SA, Ohel G, Hodnett ED. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1024-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70007-3.
citation: Benediktsdottir S, Eggebo TM, Salvesen KA. Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 24;15:273. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0704-z.
citation: Yuce T, Kalafat E, Koc A. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jul;94(7):760-765. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12649. Epub 2015 May 5.
citation: Hassan WA, Eggebo T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, Lees CC. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):189-94. doi: 10.1002/uog.13212.
citation: Seval MM, Yuce T, Kalafat E, Duman B, Aker SS, Kumbasar H, Koc A. Comparison of effects of digital vaginal examination with transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):695-700. doi: 10.1002/uog.15994. Epub 2016 Nov 8.