Clinical trial NCT06689319: Factors Linked to AI Literacy in University Students
Official title: The Relationship of Artificial Intelligence Literacy with Academic Achievement, Reading Habits, Smartphone Addiction, and Internet Addiction Among University Students
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Conditions: Technology Literacy
Reading Habits
Smartphone Addiction
Internet Addiction
Academic Acheivement
Keywords: artificial intelligence
reading habits
smartphone addiction
internet addiction
Lead sponsor: Atılım University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-11-14
Enrollment: 184
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 35
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: CASE_ONLY
Time perspective: CROSS_SECTIONAL
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: This study will involve a selected population of university students aged 18-35, recruited from Atılım University. The participants, both male and female, will be screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, such as literacy, willingness to participate, and ability to cooperate. The sample includes individuals with varied academic backgrounds relevant to the study objectives.

Brief summary: This study investigates the relationships between artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and factors such as academic achievement, reading habits, smartphone addiction, and internet addiction among university students. As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into daily life, AI literacy-necessary for understanding and evaluating AI-is emerging as a critical skill. While factors like academic success and regular reading habits may enhance AI literacy, behaviors like smartphone and internet addiction may have an adverse effect by promoting superficial information access over deeper critical engagement. This prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study will assess AI literacy using the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and analyze its association with academic and behavioral factors. The study will be conducted among participants aged 18-35 in the Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department Laboratory at Atılım University. Data will be evaluated using descriptive statistics, correlation analyses (Pearson or Spearman, depending on distribution), and significance testing. The results may highlight the impact of academic and behavioral factors on AI literacy, offering insights for educational strategies aimed at fostering critical AI competencies.

Detailed description: Artificial Intelligence (AI), a transformative force within information technology, is a subfield of computer science that involves creating intelligent machines and software that act and respond similarly to humans. With the introduction of ChatGPT, an OpenAI product released in November 2022, the concept of artificial intelligence has gained further popularity. Historically, a significant milestone for AI was the Turing Test, introduced by Alan Turing in 1950 to measure a machine's ability to exhibit human-like behaviors. Following this, the development of expert systems in the 1960s-70s, neural networks in the 1980s, machine learning and data mining in the 1990s, and deep learning in the 2000s each marked pivotal points in the AI timeline . Within the realm of computing, AI is often described as a "man-made homo sapiens" species . AI systems possess foundational skills such as learning, reasoning, self-improvement through experiential learning, language comprehension, and problem-solving, and are programmed as simulations of human intelligence. AI and its applications are utilized to address complex issues across diverse fields-including science, healthcare, education, engineering, business, defense, entertainment, and advertising-by means of expert systems.

The rapid integration of AI technologies into daily life has made it essential for individuals to acquire knowledge and skills related to these technologies. AI literacy represents an understanding and awareness of core artificial intelligence concepts. In this context, AI literacy is a fundamental competency that enables individuals to understand, utilize, and critically evaluate AI technologies, recognizing both their benefits and limitations. Having AI literacy can help individuals understand and manage AI technologies, offering an opportunity to become more informed and capable individuals. Therefore, it has become essential for everyone today to possess and enhance their AI literacy.

Factors such as reading habits and levels of academic achievement may positively influence the development of AI literacy. Individuals who have regular reading habits typically develop critical thinking and in-depth analysis skills, which facilitate understanding and critically evaluating AI technologies. Similarly, individuals with high academic performance are often experienced in accessing and applying knowledge, making them more adaptable to the foundational skills required for gaining AI literacy.

However, behaviors like internet addiction and smartphone addiction, while facilitating access to AI technologies, may have an adverse effect on AI literacy. Internet addiction reinforces a habit of accessing information rapidly and superficially, which can reduce critical thinking and focus. Likewise, smartphone addiction, due to its provision of constant and superficial access to information, may diminish interest in the deep thinking processes required for AI literacy. Therefore, internet and smartphone addiction could act as barriers in the processes requiring deep thought, analysis, and accumulation of knowledge essential for AI literacy.

To our knowledge, there is no comprehensive study that examines AI literacy among university students in relation to academic achievement, reading habits, smartphone addiction, and internet addiction from a multifaceted perspective.

The aim of this study is to reveal the relationships between university students' AI literacy and their levels of academic achievement, reading habits, internet addiction, and smartphone addiction.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Being between 18-35 years of age.
* Willingness to participate after receiving detailed information about the study's purpose and methodology.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Missing responses in questionnaires.
* Illiteracy.
* Inability to cooperate.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Assessment of reading habits
timeFrame: Day 1
measure: Assessment of smartphone addiction
timeFrame: Day 1
measure: Assessment of internet addiction
timeFrame: Day 1
measure: Assessment of academic achievement
timeFrame: Day 1
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Ankara
country: Turkey
facility: Atılım University
Study officials:
References:
citation: Kutlu, M., et al., Turkish adaptation of Young's Internet Addiction Test-Short Form: A reliability and validity study on university students and adolescents/Young Internet Bagimliligi Testi Kisa Formunun Turkce uyarlamasi: Universite ogrencileri ve ergenlerde gecerlilik ve guvenilirlik calismasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2016. 17(S1): p. 69-77.
citation: Young, K.S., Internet addiction test. Center for on-line addictions, 2009.
citation: Noyan, C.O., et al., Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short version among university students/Akilli Telefon Bagimliligi Olceginin Kisa Formunun universite ogrencilerinde Turkce gecerlilik ve guvenilirlik calismasi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2015. 16(S1): p. 73-82.
citation: Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. eCollection 2013.
citation: Verplanken, B. and S. Orbell, Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 2003. 33(6): p. 1313-1330.
citation: Çelebi, C., et al., Artificial intelligence literacy: An adaptation study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 2023. 4(2): p. 291-306.
citation: Wang, B., P.-L.P. Rau, and T. Yuan, Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & information technology, 2023. 42(9): p. 1324-1337.
citation: Kong, S.-C., W.M.-Y. Cheung, and G. Zhang, Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for developing university students' conceptual understanding, literacy, empowerment and ethical awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 2023. 26(1): p. 16-30.
citation: Laupichler, M.C., et al., Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2022. 3: p. 100101.
citation: Copeland, B.J. and D. Proudfoot, Artificial intelligence: History, foundations, and philosophical issues, in Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science. 2007, Elsevier. p. 429-482.
citation: Haenlein, M. and A. Kaplan, A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management review, 2019. 61(4): p. 5-14.
citation: Turing, A.M., Computing machinery and intelligence. 2009: Springer.
citation: Muggleton, S., Alan Turing and the development of Artificial Intelligence. AI communications, 2014. 27(1): p. 3-10.
citation: Kamble, R. and D. Shah, Applications of artificial intelligence in human life. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 2018. 6(6): p. 178-188.