Clinical trial NCT03952949: A Default Option to Enhance Dietary Quality in Participants With Food Insecurity
Official title: A Default Option to Enhance Dietary Quality in Participants With Food Insecurity
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Nutrition Poor
Keywords: Nutrition
Food Insecurity
Choice Architecture
Nudge
Lead sponsor: University at Albany
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-05-16
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity and weight-related chronic illnesses. The availability of a default option (i.e., option a consumer selects if no active choice is made) has been shown to effectively nudge consumer behavior. An online default option (i.e., prefilled grocery shopping cart) was previously shown to positively impact food selection in an online grocery shopping task.The present study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of an online default option in enhancing the nutritional quality of online grocery purchases in individuals with food insecurity.

Detailed description: Food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity and weight-related chronic illnesses. The present study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of an online default option in enhancing the nutritional quality of online grocery purchases in individuals with food insecurity.

In behavioral economics, the default option refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made. This study aims to determine whether the use of a default prefilled online grocery shopping cart results in the purchase of healthier food items in individuals with food insecurity, compared to nutrition education. The default approach, a non-monetary intervention that manipulates choice architecture, improves food choice behaviors in individuals facing significant financial constraints. The intervention is potentially broadly scalable via online platforms.

It was hypothesized that the default option effectively increases the nutritional quality of foods purchased online, compared to nutrition education.

Fifty participants recruited from food pantries in New York in 2018 were randomized to: (1) review nutrition information before selecting groceries for a week using a local grocery store's online shopping and delivery service (n = 23) or (2) modify a default prefilled online shopping cart containing groceries that meet nutritional guidelines according to their personal preferences (n = 27).

Primary outcome measures capture the nutritional quality of groceries purchased. Our primary nutritional outcomes include servings of whole grains fruits and vegetables, fiber, daily calories, fat, saturated fat, sodium and cholesterol content.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. age 18 or older
2. single person household
3. fluent in written and spoken English
4. able to provide informed consent
5. food-insecure (verbal agreement that they consider themselves to be of that category) but not currently receiving SNAP benefits (as they would otherwise have access to twice the amount of benefits typically allocated; please note that all participants will be provided with information about enrollment in SNAP following study participation)
6. current residence in a zip code served by Price Chopper's delivery program

Exclusion Criteria:

1. None of the following dietary restrictions: vegetarian/vegan, gluten-free/celiacs disease, and lactose intolerant
2. current residence outside of a zip code served by Price Chopper's delivery program

Primary outcomes:
measure: Nutritional Quality of Groceries Purchased
timeFrame: Single visit, <1.5 hours
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: University at Albany
name: Julia M. Hormes, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: