Clinical trial NCT05080049: Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes
Official title: Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes: Feasibility Study of a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Erythropoietin Injection for Intensive Care Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Anemia
Intensive Care
Keywords: Anemia
Intensive Care
Feasibility study
Erythropoietin
Lead sponsor: University Hospital, Angers
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2021-10-15
Enrollment: 42
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Recently, the french societies for critical care (SFAR and SRLF) produced guidelines for anemia treatment in critically ill patients that recommend the use of erythropoietin (EPO) in these patients, but the european society (ESICM) recommended against the use of EPO in this patients, despite recent meta analysis showing a lower mortality in patients treated with EPO.

Nevertheless, RCT on EPO in the ICU are quite all, new data are thus needed. Before conducting a large study on EPO in anemic patients in the ICU, we propose to cinduct a feasability RCT to evaluate the feasability of such a study.

Detailed description: Anemia is very common in intensive care patients, affecting approximately two-thirds of patients on admission, with a mean admission hemoglobin (Hb) level of 11.0 g/dl. The severity of anemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving blood loss (from repeated blood sampling, invasive procedures, surgical interventions, etc.) and inflammation. The latter is responsible for a decrease in endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) production and a decreased bone marrow response, which can be very prolonged (half of the patients discharged from ICU with anemia are still anemic at 6 months of discharge, with low levels of EPO, compared to the observed Hb levels). On this basis, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of EPO on the transfusion rate in this population were performed in the 1990s-2000s. The authors showed a modest reduction in blood transfusion, which was not considered clinically relevant in view of the cost of EPO at that time.

Since then, meta-analyses evaluating the benefits and risks of EPO in intensive care patients suggest a positive impact of EPO on mortality. The largest, including 34 studies (and 930,470 patients) reports a reduction in the relative risk of mortality of 0.76, 95% CI \[0.61 - 0.92\]. Beyond the reduction in red blood cell transfusions, the benefit of EPO could be directly due to its erythropoietic effect (correction of anemia) and/or its anti-inflammatory/anti-apoptotic properties. Based on this literature, the French critical care societies have recently recommended the use of EPO. However, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recently recommended against the use of EPO, based on the same literature, but suggested that the benefit of EPO should be evaluated. Indeed, the main obstacle to recommending the use of EPO seems to be economic, whereas the arrival on the market of biosimilar molecules has significantly reduced these costs.

Most of the trials on EPO in critical care patients (and included in the meta-analyses) are quite old (about 15 years) and none of them had mortality as primary endpoint. In addition, transfusion practices and the quality of blood products have changed significantly over the years. In this context of disagreement on the recommendations for the use of EPO in these patients, but of potential benefit on mortality, there is an urgent need to evaluate whether EPO decreases mortality in adult anemic patients admitted to intensive care. However, calculation of the number of patients needed to evaluate the benefit of EPO on mortality in this population yields a number of patients to be included of the order of 1800-2000 patients.

Before considering the implementation of a multicenter study involving such a large number of patients, a pilot study evaluating the feasibility and inclusion capacity for such a study seems indispensable according to the latest CONSORT recommendations.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients (age \> 18 years),
* admitted to intensive care for more than 72 hours and less than 7 days
* who have received invasive ventilatory support and/or treatment with a vasoactive agent for at least one day since admission
* with an Hb level \< 12 g/dl,
* with consent from the patient or patient's relative (or emergency inclusion procedure).

Exclusion Criteria:

* Moribund patient,
* Current hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome,
* Recent history of thromboembolic event (\< 3 months),
* Uncontrolled hypertension despite adequate antihypertensive therapy,
* Myelodysplasia or chronic pathology requiring iterative transfusions,
* EPO treatment within the last 30 days,
* Participation in another interventional trial of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent or anemia treatment,
* Expected discharge from the intensive care unit within 24 hours,
* Known hypersensitivity to EPO or any of its components,
* A history of erythroblastopenia following erythropoietin therapy
* Pregnant, breast-feeding or parturient woman
* Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
* Person under forced psychiatric care
* Person under a legal protection measure.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Recruitment rate
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Adherence to allocation groups
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Completion of follow-up of included patients
timeFrame: 90 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The proportion of patients lost to follow-up at each visit
timeFrame: 7, 14, 21, 28 and 90 days
measure: The rate of missing data for mortality outcome
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: The rate of compliance with the therapeutic protocol at each visit for inpatients
timeFrame: 7, 14, 21, and 28 days
measure: Mean serum hemoglobin value
timeFrame: 28 days
measure: ICU mortality
timeFrame: up to 90 days
measure: Hospital mortality
timeFrame: up to 90 days
measure: ICU length of stay
timeFrame: up to 90 days
measure: Hospital length of stay
timeFrame: up to 90 days
measure: Blood transfusion
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: number of red blood cells transfused
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: 90 days survival analysis
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Occurrence of hospital readmission (censored at 90 days after inclusion),
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Number of days living at home (or previous place of living)
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Quality of life measured by the EQ-5D 5L scale, EuroQol 5 dimensions
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Proportion of patients with a thromboembolic event
timeFrame: 90 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cholet
country: France
facility: Cholet Hospital
city: Tours
country: France
facility: UH Tours
Study officials:
affiliation: Angers University Hospital
name: Maxime Léger, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Angers University Hospital
name: Sigismond Lasocki, MD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References: