Clinical trial NCT02452333: Oncoplastic Approach to Excisional Breast Biopsies
Official title: Oncoplastic Approach to Excisional Breast Biopsies: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Neoplasm of Female Breast
Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
Breast Diseases
Deformity of Reconstructed Breast
Keywords: Excisional breast biopsy
Oncoplastic surgery
Oncoplastic reconstruction
Breast conserving surgery
Tezel method of breast volume measurement
Lead sponsor: Akdeniz University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-05-22
Enrollment: 80
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Many studies focusing on breast conserving surgery have affirmed the cosmetic effectiveness and oncologic success of oncoplastic methods and even modified variants of these methods reinforced with videoscopic applications. However, primary lumpectomy subjects in these studies are mainly patients who have already received the diagnosis of malignancy before the surgery. There is not much comprehensive work reported for patients without the diagnosis of malignancy. In this regard, the investigators believe the intent of the innovative oncoplastic intervention to the breast is underestimated in terms of providing diagnosis simultaneously constituting the basic component of surgical treatment. Thus, the purpose of this prospectively planned study is to provide and investigate the outcomes of an evidence-based oncoplastic approach algorithm for excisional breast biopsies.

Detailed description: Excisional breast biopsy is one of the routine surgical interventions in general surgery clinics, implemented for clinical diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. It is the diagnostic method of choice especially when fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA), core cutting needle (trucut) biopsy or vacuum-assisted core biopsy as part of a non-invasive approach can not provide sufficient diagnostic efficiency for the diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions. This invasive biopsy approach must be selectively tailored according to the nature of the lesion, either directly or as a second-stage procedure, necessarily, if a sufficiently precise diagnosis cannot be reached after practicing less-invasive protocols. By definition, basic difference from a segmental mastectomy or a lumpectomy is that excisional breast biopsy is a surgical procedure to remove suspicious breast tissue and a small amount of normal tissue around it only before the pathologic diagnosis is confirmed.

Prebiopsy localisation modalities like wire-guidance or radioisotope occult lesion localization (ROLL) are proven to reduce the rates of margin positivity at initial lumpectomies in breast cancer. Accomplishing the excision as a whole with a 1 cm layer of normal tissue around by means of an incision confined to possible mastectomy line, whilst preserving the skin if it is 1cm far away from the suspicious area and a three-dimensional marking on the specimen are considered to be general principles in conventional excisional breast biopsies. In the same way, another ground rule would be close collaboration with plastic and reconstructive surgery department, especially when significant relative breast volume loss is anticipated and defect should be restored using volume replacement methods or when the nipple and areola complex (NAC) is under threat. It is imperative that the patient be informed of the common risks and reasonable alternatives to the proposed treatment. For patients seeking additional advice on NAC disturbances it is important to keep in mind that the tattoo art might be an appealing suggestion; many consider tattooing as a practical complementary solution for sequela after reconstruction of Nipple-areolar complex.

On the other hand, in the vast majority of the cases the mainstay of treatment does not entail surgical resection of NAC or requisite volume replacement, but still there is debate as to whether surgeons should place parenchymal sutures to approximate the cut edges of the cavity walls. The rationale behind this debate is that closure of the tissue defect with direct suture approximation brings about a considerable heterogeneity when it comes to cosmetic parameters. Besides, in many cases, when not coupled with overlying skin dissection after probable dimples observed on the skin while knotting each suture, this modality is ended up too far off target to merit the highest degree of patient satisfaction. Fortunately, surgical algorithms for breast tumors have been refined a great deal in recent years with rapid developments and key technique definitions in the field of oncoplastic surgery and opinions favoring parenchymal sutures have been strengthened.

Many studies focusing on breast conserving surgery have affirmed the cosmetic effectiveness and oncologic success of oncoplastic methods and even modified variants of these methods reinforced with videoscopic applications. However, primary lumpectomy subjects in these studies are mainly patients who have already received the diagnosis of malignancy before the surgery. There is not much comprehensive work reported for patients without the diagnosis of malignancy. In this regard, the investigators believe the intent of the innovative oncoplastic intervention to the breast is underestimated in terms of providing diagnosis simultaneously constituting the basic component of surgical treatment. Thus, the purpose of this prospectively planned study is to provide and investigate the outcomes of an evidence-based oncoplastic approach algorithm for excisional breast biopsies.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients who are decided to be suitable for excisional breast biopsy.
* Nonpalpable breast lesions suspicious for malignancy where less-invasive approach like fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA), core cutting needle (trucut) biopsy or vacuum-assisted core biopsy can not provide sufficient diagnostic efficiency for the diagnosis.
* Palpable breast lesions when a sufficiently precise diagnosis cannot be reached after practicing less-invasive protocols.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who are decided to be suitable for mastectomy included protocols as the primary surgery.
* Patients who have previously had breast surgery.
* Patients who refused excisional breast biopsy.
* Patients who do not want to be photographed for cosmetic evaluations.
* Patients diagnosed with secondary suspicious breast lesions necessitating surgical intervention during the follow-up period.
* Presence of probable multicentric lesions.
* Refusal of the patient to participate in the study for any reason.
* Aberrations in the normal development and involution of the breast
* Injury or trauma history of the breast resulted in deformity.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Harris scale for the cosmetic result.
timeFrame: 3 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Surgical margin positivity for malignancy
timeFrame: Approximately 2 weeks
measure: Radiologic assessment of surgical margins
timeFrame: Intraoperatively assessed
measure: Morbidity
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Reoperations
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Breast Size
timeFrame: Preoperatively assessed
measure: Lesion Peripherality
timeFrame: Preoperatively assessed
measure: Anticipated specimen volume
timeFrame: Preoperatively assessed
measure: Exact specimen volume
timeFrame: Intraoperatively assessed
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Antalya
country: Turkey
facility: Akdeniz University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Akdeniz University, General Surgery Department
name: Cumhur Arıcı, Professor
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Santos G, Urban C, Edelweiss MI, Zucca-Matthes G, de Oliveira VM, Arana GH, Iera M, Rietjens M, de Lima RS, Spautz C, Kuroda F, Anselmi K, Capp E. Long-Term Comparison of Aesthetical Outcomes After Oncoplastic Surgery and Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2500-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4301-6. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
citation: McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty--Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Oct;58(7):889-901. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.03.008.
citation: Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1389-95. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8877.
citation: Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Wild T, Krois W, Fitzal F. Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(1):149-52. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0173-4. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
citation: Yamashita K, Shimizu K. Transaxillary retromammary route approach of video-assisted breast surgery enables the inner-side breast cancer to be resected for breast conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):578-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.028.
citation: Serra-Renom JM, Serra-Mestre JM, Martinez L, D'Andrea F. Endoscopic reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects using latissimus dorsi muscle flap without causing scars on the back. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;37(5):941-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0192-3. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
citation: Tezel E, Numanoglu A. Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Mar;105(3):1019-23. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00028.
citation: Nakajima H, Fujiwara I, Mizuta N, Sakaguchi K, Hachimine Y, Magae J. Video-assisted skin-sparing breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue: clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1982-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0429-1. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
citation: Nakajima H, Fujiwara I, Mizuta N, Sakaguchi K, Hachimine Y. Video-assisted skin-sparing breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):91-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e3fa6.
citation: Zaha H. Partial breast reconstruction for the medial quadrants using the omental flap. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3358. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3907-z. Epub 2014 Jul 26.