Clinical trial NCT05791747: Representations, Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Hypnosis in Patients Followed for Colorectal Cancer
Official title: Representations, Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Hypnosis in Patients Followed for Colorectal Cancer
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Conditions: Cancer Colorectal
Hypnosis, Animal
Keywords: cancer colorectal
hypnose
representations
Lead sponsor: University of Nimes
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-03-30
Enrollment: 15
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective: OTHER
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Men and women diagnosed with colorectal cancer, still in treatment or not.

Brief summary: Over the past decade, changes in knowledge and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine have been occurring. One study shows that 21% of patients are turning to them. In contrast, hypnosis is among the least used. While perceptions of alternative medicine are improving, there is still widespread skepticism about the beliefs of hypnosis and this may explain why patients are not turning to it. Although its use in oncology is no longer in question, and its efficacy in the management of side effects has been demonstrated, no recent qualitative study has been conducted to examine the representations of hypnosis among cancer patients. It therefore seems relevant to us today to know the evolution of the representations and attitudes of cancer patients towards hypnosis.

Detailed description: Cancer patients experience psychological difficulties during the disease, associated with treatment, and even in the post-treatment period. Among the most common, they mention emotional distress, significant fatigue, sleep disturbance, or pain. Several authors agree that there is a cluster of four core symptoms associated with the disease and its treatments, including fatigue, nausea/vomiting, depression and pain. These symptoms have a significant impact on daily activities, resulting in a decrease in quality of life.

Reducing the symptoms of cancer to the sole etiology of the disease or its treatments does not allow us to consider a management action. Indeed, patients with cancer face the diagnosis and follow a course of care that includes many medical therapies (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc.). Integrative medicine takes into account the need for these medical therapies by adding the importance of supportive care for patients. Specifically, the expected effects are to reduce the after-effects for people thanks to an offer of support care adapted to their needs and regularly evaluated, ensuring a better quality of life immediately and in the longer term, as well as by providing information that allows patients to make the most informed choices possible.

Physical activity, dietary monitoring, and psychosocial interventions remain the most common complementary therapies offered to patients to reduce treatment side effects. Among this wide choice, patients can find themselves lost. Over the past decade, changes in knowledge and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine have been occurring. For example, one study found that 21% of patients are turning to them, indicating a growing interest in this type of care.

While perceptions of alternative medicine are improving, there is still widespread skepticism about hypnosis. As a result, even though scientific research shows positive effects of this type of therapy, a 2006 study in Canada found that out of 15 breast cancer patients using psychosocial therapies, only 6% used hypnosis. Another study conducted in 2018 confirms these results: on a population of 212 patients with different cancers, it appears that hypnosis is the therapy least used and whose interest is lowest.

Few studies have been conducted to determine the reasons for this lack of interest or the beliefs that are associated with hypnosis. Existing research suggests that patients lack information about hypnosis and its effectiveness, may have ambivalent perceptions about it or be skeptical of its effectiveness, and that their beliefs may be influenced by the media. Specifically, one study point out that positive attitudes toward hypnosis are even associated with better hypnotic response. While its use in oncology is no longer in question, no recent qualitative study has been conducted questioning the representations of hypnosis with cancer patients. It therefore seems relevant to us today to know the evolution of the representations and attitudes of cancer patients towards hypnosis. To do this, and according to Leventhal's model of self-regulation, the information obtained by a patient, whether or not it is medically based, is integrated by the patient in order to provide a "lay" understanding of the subject in question. Activated representations may then be guided by the individual's current and prior awareness or by social messages from perceived significant others or authoritative sources and this impacts attitudes.

The aim of the study was to investigate psychosocial representations related to hypnosis in colorectal cancer patients and to assess the impact of these representations on the intention to use hypnosis.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Having been diagnosed with colorectal cancer
3. Able to understand and read French

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who do not have a telephone or devices that allow remote interviewing
2. Medical (neurological, psychiatric, etc.) or psychological conditions that do not allow participation in the study (completion of the consent form and coherent speech for the interview)
3. Hearing impaired patient without hearing aids
4. Patient under guardianship or court protection

Primary outcomes:
measure: social representations
timeFrame: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Barriers and levers to using hypnosis
timeFrame: 30 minutes
measure: Intention to turn to hypnosis
timeFrame: 30 minutes
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Nîmes
country: France
facility: Université de Nîmes
state: Gard
Study officials:
References:
citation: Corbett, T., Groarke, A., Walsh, J. C., & McGuire, B. E. (2016). Cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors: Application of the common sense model of illness representations. BMC Cancer, 16(1), 919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2907-8 Curt, G. A., Breitbart, W., Cella, D., Groopman, J. E., Horning, S. J., Itri, L. M., Johnson, D. H., Miaskowski, C., Scherr, S. L., Portenoy, R. K., & Vogelzang, N. J. (2000). Impact of Cancer-Related Fatigue on the Lives of Patients: New Findings From the Fatigue Coalition. The Oncologist, 5(5), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.5-5-353 Forlenza, M. J., Hall, P., Lichtenstein, P., Evengard, B., & Sullivan, P. F. (2005). Epidemiology of cancer-related fatigue in the Swedish twin registry. Cancer, 104(9), 2022-2031. Helyer, L. K., Chin, S., Chui, B. K., Fitzgerald, B., Verma, S., Rakovitch, E., Dranitsaris, G., & Clemons, M. (2006). The use of complementary and alternative medicines among patients with locally advanced breast cancer - a descriptive study. BMC Cancer, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-39 Henry, D. H., Viswanathan, H. N., Elkin, E. P., Traina, S., Wade, S., & Cella, D. (2008). Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: Results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16(7), 791-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0380-2 Hofman, M., Ryan, J. L., Figueroa-Moseley, C. D., Jean-Pierre, P., & Morrow, G. R. (2007). Cancer-Related Fatigue: The Scale of the Problem. The Oncologist, 12(S1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-S1-4 Lawrence, D. P. (2004). Evidence Report on the Occurrence, Assessment, and Treatment of Fatigue in Cancer Patients. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 2004(32), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh027 Leventhal, H., & Diefenbach, M. (1991). The Active Side of Illness Cognition. In J. A. Skelton & R. T. Croyle (Éds.), Mental Representation in Health and Illness (p. 247-272). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9074-9_11 Lind, S. B., Jacobsen, H. B., Solbakken, O. A., & Reme, S. E. (2021). Clinical Hypnosis in Medical Care: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 20, 153473542110586. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354211058678 Mendoza, M. E., Capafons, A., & Jensen, M. P. (2017). Hypnosis attitudes: Treatment effects and associations with symptoms in individuals with cancer. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 60(1), 50-67. Miller, S. J., Schnur, J. B., Montgomery, G. H., & Jandorf, L. (2015). African-Americans and Latinos' Perceptions of Using Hypnosis to Alleviate Distress Before a Colonoscopy. NCCN. (2022). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology-Cancer-Related Fatigue. NCCN.org. Qureshi, M., Zelinski, E., & Carlson, L. E. (2018). Cancer and Complementary Therapies: Current Trends in Survivors' Interest and Use. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 17(3), 844-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735418762496