Clinical trial NCT00013247: Facilitating Shared Decisionmaking About Prostate Cancer Screening
Official title: Facilitating Shared Decisionmaking About Prostate Cancer Screening
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Prostate Cancer
Lead sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
Sponsor class: FED
First posted: 2001-03-16
Enrollment: 1152
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 50
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Due to the disputed efficacy of prostate cancer (CaP) screening and treatment, most authorities recommend that providers inform and involve patients in CaP screening decisions.

Detailed description: Background:

Due to the disputed efficacy of prostate cancer (CaP) screening and treatment, most authorities recommend that providers inform and involve patients in CaP screening decisions.

Objectives:

This study evaluated two interventions designed to facilitate this process.

Methods:

1152 male veterans age 50+ with no CaP and primary care appointments at four VA medical facilities in VISN 23 were randomly assigned to one of three groups: mailed pamphlet intervention, mailed video intervention, or usual care (control). Intervention materials were mailed two weeks prior to a target primary care appointment and patient telephone surveys were conducted one week (T1) and one year (T2) after the target appointment. Outcomes included: a 10- item validated knowledge index; responses to questions on CaP natural history, treatment efficacy, PSA accuracy, and expert disagreement about the PSA; whether screening was discussed with provider; scores on decision information seeking, participation and satisfaction scales; screening and treatment preferences; and PSA testing rates.

Status:

Complete

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must be male veterans, age 50 and older, with a scheduled primary care appointment at one of 5 VISN 13 medical facilities. Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer will be excluded.

Exclusion Criteria:

Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Minneapolis
country: United States
facility: Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
state: Minnesota
Study officials:
affiliation: Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
name: Melissa R. Partin, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Partin MR, Nelson D, Flood AB, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Wilt TJ. Who uses decision aids? Subgroup analyses from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of two prostate cancer screening decision support interventions. Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):285-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00400.x.
citation: Radosevich DM, Partin MR, Nugent S, Nelson D, Flood AB, Holtzman J, Dillon N, Haas M, Wilt TJ. Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):143-52. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00207-6.
citation: Wilt TJ, Partin MR. Reducing PSAnxiety: The importance of noninvasive chronic disease management in prostate cancer detection and treatment. Am J Med. 2004 Nov 15;117(10):796-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.10.002. No abstract available.
citation: Wilt TJ, Partin MR. Prostate cancer intervention. Involving the patient in early detection and treatment. Postgrad Med. 2003 Oct;114(4):43-9; quiz 50. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2003.10.1506.
citation: Partin MR, Nelson D, Radosevich D, Nugent S, Flood AB, Dillon N, Holtzman J, Haas M, Wilt TJ. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Aug;19(8):835-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30047.x.
citation: Taylor BC, Wilt TJ, Clothier B, Grill JP, Partin MR. Assessing health status in older men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS. 2006 Jul 1; 23(7):29-40.