Clinical trial NCT00307151: Antiviral Responses to NNRTI-Based vs. PI-Based ARV Therapy in HIV Infected Infants Who Have or Have Not Received Single Dose NVP for Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV
Official title: Phase II, Parallel, Randomized, Clinical Trials Comparing the Responses to Initiation of NNRTI-Based Versus PI-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV Infected Infants Who Have and Have Not Previously Received Single Dose Nevirapine for Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: HIV Infections
Keywords: Treatment Naive
Mother-To-Child Transmission
MTCT
Pediatrics
Viral resistance
Lead sponsor: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
Sponsor class: NETWORK
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
name: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
First posted: 2006-03-27
Enrollment: 452
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 2
Maximum age (years): 36
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: A single dose of nevirapine (SD NVP) given to an HIV infected pregnant woman followed by a single dose to her infant has been shown to be an effective way of reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral regimen versus a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen in HIV infected infants who had or had not been exposed to SD NVP for prevention of MTCT.

\>\>

\>\> A five year follow up has been added to the study.

Detailed description: Single dose nevirapine (SD NVP) has greatly reduced the rate of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens are recommended for use by the World Health Organization (WHO) in resource-limited settings. However, research suggests that mothers and infants exposed to SD NVP experience higher virologic failure rates when treated with NNRTI-based regimens than their unexposed counterparts. Data show that the use of SD NVP is associated with NNRTI resistance in HIV infected women and infants. The purpose of this trial was to compare and evaluate virologic responses to an NNRTI-based regimen versus a protease-inhibitor (PI)-based regimen in HIV infected infants who had or had not been exposed to SD NVP intrapartum and after birth.

\>\>

\>\> Participants were enrolled into one of two Cohorts with proposed enrollment into each Cohort of 288 participants. Cohort I participants must have received SD NVP for prevention of MTCT. Cohort II participants and their mothers must not have previously received NVP or any other NNRTIs. Participants in both Cohorts were randomly assigned to receive either an NNRTI (Coh I:NVP and Coh II: NVP) or PI (Coh I: LPV/r and Coh II: LPV/r) -based regimen. The NNRTI-based regimen included NVP, zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). The PI-based regimen included lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), ZDV and 3TC. If participants experienced adverse reactions to ZDV, stavudine (d4T) could be substituted. Randomization was stratified by age (6-\<12 months vs. \>=12 months, with the 2-\<6 month stratum added in protocol version 4.0 when the lower age limit was decreased from 6 months to 2 months).

\>\>

\>\> Study visits were scheduled at entry, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and then every 24 weeks. A physical exam, blood collection, and assessments of HIV-related symptoms occurred at all visits.

\>\>

\>\> Based on a Data Safety and Monitoring Committee (DSMB) review of study data on April 20 2009, enrollment to Cohort I was closed and interim results released. Data from this and another similar study (AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5208) conducted in mothers, showed that the PI-based regimen was more effective than the NNRTI-based regimen in infants who had received SD NVP for prevention of MTCT. Cohort II was allowed to remain open for enrollment and the lower age limit for enrollment reduced from 6 months to 2 months.

\>\>

\>\> In June 2010, follow-up for all subjects was extended from the original 24 weeks beyond enrollment of the last subject to 48 weeks. On October 27 2010, the DSMB conducted a final review of Cohort II data, and recommended results be unblinded and released. As found in Cohort I, the PI-based regimen was more effective than the NNRTI-based regimen in infants who had not been previously exposed to SD NVP for PMTCT. Primary and secondary outcome results for Cohort I include all follow-up until April 20, 2009 and for Cohort II, all follow-up until October 27, 2010.

\>\>

\>\> Version 5.0 of the protocol (March 21, 2011) extended follow-up on all subjects for an additional 5 years to December 2016. The purpose of the extension was to collect long term safety and virologic efficacy data in this study population and to pilot administration of a series of neuropsychological tests. During the extension, participants did not receive any medications through the study, but instead through their local clinics. Clinic visits took place every 3 months. Adverse event summaries use all follow-up in both Cohorts until December, 2016.

\>\>

\>\>

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria for All Participants:\>\>

* age \>=6 months to \< 36 months (decreased to 2 months in protocol version 4.0)\>\>
* HIV infected\>\>
* Viral load greater than 5,000 copies/ml within 60 days of study entry\>\>
* Treatment naive except for antiretrovirals (ARV) used to prevent MTCT (infant ARV use for \<=1 week postpartum for prevention of MTCT allowed) \>\>
* Eligible for treatment according to WHO pediatric algorithm (updated in protocol version 1.0, Letter of amendment (LOA)#1) and protocol version 2.0, LOA#3). Subjects with active opportunistic infections were not eligible for study participation until they had been treated and were clinically stable \>\>
* Parent or legal guardian willing to provide signed informed consent\>\>

Inclusion Criteria for Cohort I:\>\>

* Documentation of maternal or infant NVP exposure or a highly reliable verbal report. (Updated in protocol version 2.0, LOA#3 to require written clinic/hospital documentation of infant exposure to SD NVP)\>\>
* Use of maternal ARV, including NVP, permitted during pregnancy\>\>
* One or more of the following: strict formula feeding, initial infant HIV diagnosis occurring while younger than 60 days of age, or an initial AIDS-defining illness diagnosis by WHO criteria while younger than 60 days of age. \>\>

Inclusion Criteria for Cohort II:\>\>

* Use of maternal ARVs, excluding NNRTIs, permitted during pregnancy\>\>
* Evidence of lack of prior NVP exposure (added in protocol version 2.0, LOA#3) by review of maternal and child medical records or health card (or other written documentation) for evidence of NVP exposure to mother or infant during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. If no written documentation showing lack of NVP use was shown in these records or if these records were not available for review, then a verbal report considered to be highly reliable by the study nurse was acceptable AND one or more of the following: \>\>

  1. Study subject born before single dose NVP was available for prevention of MTCT of HIV in the location of birth of study subject\>\>
  2. Study subject born before the biological mother's first positive HIV test\>\>
  3. Site staff had another reason to believe the subject had not been exposed to NVP \>\> \>\> Exclusion Criteria for All Participants:\>\>
* Grade 2 or higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at study screening\>\>
* Grade 3 or higher laboratory toxicity at study screening\>\>
* Received ARVs for anything other than the prevention of intrapartum MTCT. Infants who received ARVs after the first week of life (e.g., for the prevention of MTCT of HIV through breastfeeding) were excluded \>\>
* Acute serious infections requiring active treatment. Subjects could be receiving treatment for active TB if it did not include rifamycin drugs\>\>
* Receiving chemotherapy for an active tumor\>\>
* History of a cardiac conduction abnormality and underlying structural heart disease\>\>
* Required certain medications\>\> \>\> Exclusion Criteria for Cohort I: \>\>
* History of or currently breastfeeding. Breastfed infants with a positive HIV test or who had experienced an AIDS-defining illness by WHO criteria at 60 days of age or younger were not excluded\>\>

Exclusion Criteria for Cohort II:\>\>

* Exposure to any maternal NVP or other NNRTI prior to or during the pregnancy or while breastfeeding\>\>
* Exposure of infant to NVP at any time including during the first week of life

Primary outcomes:
measure: Percent of Participants With Treatment Failure, Defined as a Confirmed Virologic Failure or Permanent Discontinuation of the Randomized NNRTI or PI Component of Study Treatment
timeFrame: Earlier of 24 weeks or date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009; Coh II: October 27, 2010)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Time From Randomization to Treatment Failure, Defined as Virologic Failure or Permanent Discontinuation of the Randomized NNRTI or PI Component of Study Treatment
timeFrame: Until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009 - median follow-up 48 weeks and range 0 - 125 weeks; Coh II: October 27, 2010 - median follow-up 72 weeks and range from 0 to 204 weeks)
measure: Percent of Participants Experiencing Virologic Failure
timeFrame: Earlier of 24 weeks or date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009; Coh II: October 27, 2010)
measure: Time From Randomization to Virologic Failure
timeFrame: Until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009 - median follow-up 48 weeks and range 0 - 125 weeks; Coh II: October 27, 2010 - median follow-up 72 weeks and range from 0 to 204 weeks)
measure: Time From Start of Study Treatment to First New Grade >=3 Lab Abnormality, Sign or Symptom Occurring on Study Treatment
timeFrame: On randomized NNRTI or PI component of study treatment and until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009; Coh II: October 27, 2010)
measure: Number of Participants Developing New NRTI, NNRTI or PI-resistant Virus
timeFrame: Until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009 - median follow-up 48 weeks and range 0 - 125 weeks; Coh II: October 27, 2010 - median follow-up 72 weeks and range from 0 to 204 weeks)
measure: Change in CD4 Percent From Entry to Week 48
timeFrame: 48 weeks if before date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009; Coh II: October 27, 2010)
measure: Time From Randomization to HIV-related Disease Progression or Death
timeFrame: Until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009 - median follow-up 48 weeks and range 0 - 125 weeks; Coh II: October 27, 2010 - median follow-up 72 weeks and range from 0 to 204 weeks)
measure: Time From Randomization to Death
timeFrame: Until date of DSMB decision to unblind Cohort results (Coh I: April 20, 2009 - median follow-up 48 weeks and range 0 - 125 weeks; Coh II: October 27, 2010 - median follow-up 72 weeks and range from 0 to 204 weeks)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Pune
country: India
facility: BJ Medical College CRS
state: Maharashtra
city: Mzimba Road
country: Malawi
facility: University of North Carolina Lilongwe CRS
state: Lilongwe
city: Natal
country: South Africa
facility: Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of Kwazulu
state: Durban
city: Cape Town
country: South Africa
facility: University of Stellenbosch-Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa
city: Johannesburg
country: South Africa
facility: Harriet Shezi Clinic at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital
city: Johannesburg
country: South Africa
facility: Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital
city: IDC Research Offices
country: Tanzania
facility: Kilimanjaro Christian Medical CRS
state: Moshi
city: Kampala
country: Uganda
facility: Makerere University
city: Lusaka
country: Zambia
facility: George Clinic CRS
city: Harare
country: Zimbabwe
facility: UZ-College of Health Sciences
Study officials:
affiliation: Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
name: Paul Palumbo, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand
name: Avy Violari, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Arrive E, Newell ML, Ekouevi DK, Chaix ML, Thiebaut R, Masquelier B, Leroy V, Perre PV, Rouzioux C, Dabis F; Ghent Group on HIV in Women and Children. Prevalence of resistance to nevirapine in mothers and children after single-dose exposure to prevent vertical transmission of HIV-1: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1009-21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym104. Epub 2007 May 28.
citation: Chi BH, Sinkala M, Stringer EM, Cantrell RA, Mtonga V, Bulterys M, Zulu I, Kankasa C, Wilfert C, Weidle PJ, Vermund SH, Stringer JS. Early clinical and immune response to NNRTI-based antiretroviral therapy among women with prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine. AIDS. 2007 May 11;21(8):957-64. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32810996b2.
citation: Eshleman SH, Hoover DR, Hudelson SE, Chen S, Fiscus SA, Piwowar-Manning E, Jackson JB, Kumwenda NI, Taha TE. Development of nevirapine resistance in infants is reduced by use of infant-only single-dose nevirapine plus zidovudine postexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Infect Dis. 2006 Feb 15;193(4):479-81. doi: 10.1086/499967. Epub 2006 Jan 11.
citation: White PD. What causes prolonged fatigue after infectious mononucleosis: and does it tell us anything about chronic fatigue syndrome? J Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 1;196(1):4-5. doi: 10.1086/518615. Epub 2007 May 24. No abstract available.
citation: Sankatsing RR, Wit FW, Pakker N, Vyankandondera J, Mmiro F, Okong P, Kastelein JJ, Lange JM, Stroes ES, Reiss P. Effects of nevirapine, compared with lamivudine, on lipids and lipoproteins in HIV-1-uninfected newborns: the stopping infection from mother-to-child via breast-feeding in Africa lipid substudy. J Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 1;196(1):15-22. doi: 10.1086/518248. Epub 2007 May 16.
citation: Palumbo P, Lindsey JC, Hughes MD, Cotton MF, Bobat R, Meyers T, Bwakura-Dangarembizi M, Chi BH, Musoke P, Kamthunzi P, Schimana W, Purdue L, Eshleman SH, Abrams EJ, Millar L, Petzold E, Mofenson LM, Jean-Philippe P, Violari A. Antiretroviral treatment for children with peripartum nevirapine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 14;363(16):1510-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000931.
citation: Palumbo P, Violari A, Lindsey J, Hughes M, Jean-Philippe P, Mofenson L, Purdue L, Eshleman S for the IMPAACT P1060 Study Team. Nevirapine vs Lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in single dose Nevirapine-exposed HIV-infected infants: preliminary results from the IMPAACT P1060 Trial. 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, Capetown, July, 2009.
citation: Palumbo P, Violari A, Lindsey J, Hughes M, Jean-Philippe P, Mofenson L, Bwakura-Dangarembizi M, Kamthunzi P, Eshleman S and Prudue L for the IMPAACT P1060 Team. Nevirapine (NVP)-vs. Lopinavir-Ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) among HIV-infected infants in resource-limited settings: The IMPAACT P1060 Trial. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, February, 2011.
citation: Patel K, Lindsey J, Angelidou K, Aldrovandi G, Palumbo P; IMPAACT P1060 Study Team. Metabolic effects of initiating lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens among young children. AIDS. 2018 Oct 23;32(16):2327-2336. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001980.
citation: Angelidou K, Palumbo P, Lindsey J, Violary A, Archary M, Barlow L, Claggett B, Hughes M, Wei LJ; International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT) P1060 Study Team. Defining Study Outcomes That Better Reflect Individual Response to Treatment. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Mar;37(3):258-262. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001766.
citation: Barlow-Mosha L, Angelidou K, Lindsey J, Archary M, Cotton M, Dittmer S, Fairlie L, Kabugho E, Kamthunzi P, Kinikar A, Mbengeranwa T, Msuya L, Sambo P, Patel K, Barr E, Jean-Phillipe P, Violari A, Mofenson L, Palumbo P, Chi BH. Nevirapine- Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Infants and Young Children: Long-term Follow-up of the IMPAACT P1060 Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1113-1121. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw488. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
citation: Lindsey JC, Hughes MD, Violari A, Eshleman SH, Abrams EJ, Bwakura-Dangarembizi M, Barlow-Mosha L, Kamthunzi P, Sambo PM, Cotton MF, Moultrie H, Khadse S, Schimana W, Bobat R, Zimmer B, Petzold E, Mofenson LM, Jean-Philippe P, Palumbo P; P1060 Study Team. Predictors of virologic and clinical response to nevirapine versus lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in young children with and without prior nevirapine exposure for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Aug;33(8):846-54. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000337.
citation: Violari A, Lindsey JC, Hughes MD, Mujuru HA, Barlow-Mosha L, Kamthunzi P, Chi BH, Cotton MF, Moultrie H, Khadse S, Schimana W, Bobat R, Purdue L, Eshleman SH, Abrams EJ, Millar L, Petzold E, Mofenson LM, Jean-Philippe P, Palumbo P. Nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir for HIV-infected children. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2380-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113249.