Clinical trial NCT00469859: Lestaurtinib, Cytarabine, and Idarubicin in Treating Younger Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Official title: A Pilot Study of Lestaurtinib (CEP-701) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Young Patients With Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE1
PHASE2
Conditions: Leukemia
Keywords: recurrent childhood acute myeloid leukemia
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia
secondary acute myeloid leukemia
Lead sponsor: Children's Oncology Group
Sponsor class: NETWORK
Collaborators: name: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First posted: 2007-05-07
Enrollment: 14
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 1
Maximum age (years): 30
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: RATIONALE: Lestaurtinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cytarabine and idarubicin, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving lestaurtinib together with cytarabine and idarubicin may kill more cancer cells.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of lestaurtinib when given together with cytarabine and idarubicin and to see how well they work in treating younger patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Detailed description: OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Determine a safe, tolerable, and biologically active dose of lestaurtinib in combination with chemotherapy comprising cytarabine and idarubicin in younger patients with relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.

Secondary

* Determine the overall response rate in patients treated with this regimen.
* Optimize dosing of lestaurtinib based primarily on biologic activity rather than toxicity.
* Correlate the clinical response to this regimen with the ability to achieve adequate FLT3 plasma inhibitory activity levels and the in vitro sensitivity of pretreatment leukemic cells to lestaurtinib in these patients.
* Determine the mechanisms of resistance to lestaurtinib in these patients.
* Assess the feasibility of using rapid central determination of FLT3 mutation status at study entry to determine induction therapy in future upfront protocols.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, dose-finding study of lestaurtinib followed by an efficacy study.

* Dose-finding phase:

  * Course 1: Patients receive cytarabine IV over 2 hours twice daily on days 1-4, idarubicin IV over 15 minutes on days 2-4, and oral lestaurtinib twice daily on days 5-28. Patients achieving complete or partial response proceed to course 2.

Cohorts of 6 patients receive escalating doses of lestaurtinib until a tolerable and biologically active dose (TBAD) is determined. The TBAD is defined as the dose at which no more than 2 of 6 patients experience DLT and biologic activity is confirmed by plasma inhibitory activity (PIA) assay.

* Course 2: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine IV over 3 hours twice daily on days 1-4 and oral lestaurtinib (at the dose determined in course 1) twice daily on days 5-28. Patients achieving complete or partial response proceed to continuation therapy.
* Continuation therapy: Patients receive oral lestaurtinib twice daily on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

  * Efficacy phase: Once the TBAD is determined, subsequent patients receive treatment as in course 1 and 2 with lestaurtinib at the TBAD. Patients may also receive continuation therapy as in the dose-finding phase.

Blood samples are collected periodically during study treatment for pharmacokinetic and PIA assays.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 37 patients will be accrued for this study.

Eligibility criteria: DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to FAB classification

  * At least 5% blasts in the bone marrow, with or without extramedullary disease
* In first relapse after induction therapy OR refractory to induction therapy with ≤ 1 attempt at remission induction

  * Patients who are in a first relapse \> 1 year from their initial diagnosis of AML are excluded from the dose-finding phase of the study, but are eligible for the efficacy phase
  * First relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allowed provided patient has no evidence of active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and is at least 4 months posttransplantation
* Positive for a FLT3 activating mutation (internal tandem duplication or kinase domain point mutation) using standard polymerase chain reaction-based procedures at any time in the course of illness
* Treatment-related AML allowed

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* Karnofsky performance status (PS) 50-100% (\> 16 years of age) OR Lansky PS 50-100% (≤ 16 years of age)
* Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min OR serum creatinine based on age and gender as follows:

  * Creatinine no greater than 0.4 mg/dL (1 month to \< 6 months of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 0.5 mg/dL (6 months to \< 1 year of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 0.6 mg/dL (1 year to \< 2 years of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 0.8 mg/dL (2 years to \< 6 years of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 1 mg/dL (6 years to \< 10 years of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 1.2 mg/dL (10 years to \< 13 years of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 1.4 mg/dL (females) or 1.5 mg/dL (males) (13 years to \< 16 years of age)
  * Creatinine no greater than 1.4 mg/dL (females) or 1.7 mg/dL (males) (16 years of age and over)
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* ALT \< 5 times ULN (unless it is related to leukemic involvement)
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* Shortening fraction ≥ 27% by echocardiogram OR ejection fraction ≥ 50% by radionuclide angiogram

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* Recovered from all prior therapy
* No prior cumulative anthracycline doses exceeding 450 mg/m\^2 daunorubicin equivalents

  * Patients who relapse after receiving treatment on protocol COG-AAML03P1 or COG-AAML0531 (300 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin hydrochloride and 48 mg/m\^2 of mitoxantrone hydrochloride) allowed provided they have not received any additional anthracyclines
* At least 14 days since prior cytotoxic therapy

  * Hydroxyurea allowed to decrease the WBC prior to starting protocol treatment
  * No concurrent hydroxyurea
* At least 7 days since prior biologic agents
* At least 14 days since prior monoclonal antibody therapy
* Radiotherapy to chloromas allowed

  * Irradiated lesion may not be used to assess tumor response
* No other concurrent chemotherapy, investigational therapy, immunomodulating agents, or steroids

  * Steroids used as an antiemetic allowed
  * Prophylactic intrathecal cytarabine allowed
* No concurrent CYP3A4,5 inhibitors, including any of the following:

  * Azole antifungals (e.g., fluconazole or voriconazole)
  * Cyclosporine
  * Erythromycin
  * Clarithromycin
  * Troleandomycin
  * HIV protease inhibitors
  * Nefazodone
* No concurrent CYP3A4,5 inducers, including any of the following:

  * Carbamazepine
  * Dexamethasone
  * Rifampin
  * Phenobarbital
  * Phenytoin
  * Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Dose-limiting Toxicity
timeFrame: 28 days
measure: >80% Inhibition of FLT3 Phosphorylation in a Majority of Post-treatment Trough Time Points
timeFrame: Course 1 day 7, day 14, day 21, and day 28.
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Birmingham
country: United States
facility: Lurleen Wallace Comprehensive Cancer at University of Alabama - Birmingham
state: Alabama
city: Orange
country: United States
facility: Children's Hospital of Orange County
state: California
city: Washington
country: United States
facility: Children's National Medical Center
state: District of Columbia
city: Atlanta
country: United States
facility: Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
state: Georgia
city: Chicago
country: United States
facility: Children's Memorial Hospital - Chicago
state: Illinois
city: Indianapolis
country: United States
facility: Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
state: Indiana
city: Baltimore
country: United States
facility: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
state: Maryland
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
state: Massachusetts
city: Ann Arbor
country: United States
facility: C.S. Mott Children's Hospital at University of Michigan Medical Center
state: Michigan
city: Minneapolis
country: United States
facility: Masonic Cancer Center at University of Minnesota
state: Minnesota
city: St. Louis
country: United States
facility: Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
state: Missouri
city: New York
country: United States
facility: Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University Medical Center
state: New York
city: Cincinnati
country: United States
facility: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
state: Ohio
city: Portland
country: United States
facility: Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
state: Oregon
city: Philadelphia
country: United States
facility: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
state: Pennsylvania
city: Pittsburgh
country: United States
facility: Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
state: Pennsylvania
city: Memphis
country: United States
facility: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
state: Tennessee
city: Nashville
country: United States
facility: Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
state: Tennessee
city: Dallas
country: United States
facility: Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
state: Texas
city: Houston
country: United States
facility: Baylor University Medical Center - Houston
state: Texas
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center - Seattle
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
name: Patrick A. Brown, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
name: Donald Small, MD, PhD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References: