Clinical trial NCT06022263: STA363 in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
Official title: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study Investigating the Safety and Tolerability of STA363 in Patients With Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Lumbar Disc Herniation
Keywords: Lumbar radiculopathy
Lead sponsor: Stayble Therapeutics
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
Collaborators: name: Cromsource
name: Antaros Medical
name: VIEDOC
First posted: 2023-09-01
Enrollment: 24
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 50
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to establish safety and tolerability of STA363 injected into a herniated intervertebral disc in patients with sciatica due to disc herniation. The main questions the trial aims to answer are:

1. Is the treatment safe and tolerable?
2. Does the volume of the disc and the herniation decrease?
3. Is sciatica reduced? Participants will be given an injection into the herniated disc of either placebo or STA363 (one dose).

Researchers will compare safety, tolerability, effects on disc and herniation volume and on symptoms between the group of patients injected with placebo and the group injected with STA363.

Detailed description: The study will include 24 patients, recruited at 4 different sites, suffering from radiculopathy due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Patients will be screened for symptoms, disease history and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of LDH. Baseline data (e.g. pain recording and MRI data) will be collected, and 1/3 of the patients will then be randomized to intradiscal injection with placebo (Omnipaque with water for injection, 1.5 mL) and 2/3 of the patients will be randomized to STA363 (lactic acid, 120 mg/mL with Omnipaque, 1.5 mL). The injections will be done using fluoroscopic guidance, and the patients will be treated with intravenous antibiotics and sedatives. The first follow-up will be done by phone 1 week after the treatment, while the other follow-ups will be physical visits at month 1, 3 and 6 at the site. In conjunction with the visits, the patient will record daily pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale) for 7 days using an eDiary, and MRI will be performed. The primary completion time i 6 months with the primary objectives safety and tolerability. Important secondary objectives will be changes of disc volume and pain.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Signed informed consent prior to any study-related procedures
2. Patient has a single subligamentous posteriolateral lumbar disc herniation (protrusion or extrusion) of any lumbar disc below L1/L2 diagnosed by clinical symptoms and/or physical findings and confirmed by MRI
3. Patient has symptoms and/or physical findings consistent with a unilateral radiculopathy affecting one nerve root (L2-L5)
4. Patient has leg pain of the dermatome consistent with the nerve root affected by the herniation
5. The herniated disc is 3 or lower on the Pfirrmann scale (grade 1-5)
6. Patient has experienced symptoms of a herniated disc for at least 6 weeks prior to randomisation without sufficient relief with pain medications and other conservative therapies
7. Ability to understand the written and verbal information about the study
8. Male and female patients 18 years or older but 50 years or younger
9. Women of childbearing potential eligible if using effective contraceptives
10. Patient has a body mass index (BMI) of ≥18 to ≤35 kg/m2
11. Patients who meet all the following NRS selection criteria for radicular leg pain:

    1. Presence of at least 5 pain NRS assessments (entries) for 7 consecutive days
    2. NRS daily pain scores between 3-9
    3. Not more than 2 NRS scores of "3"

Exclusion criteria:

1. Treatment with any investigational product within 3 months prior to the screening visit
2. Patient has a sequestered lumbar disc herniation or transligamentous/ herniation confirmed by MRI
3. Patient has a bulging disc
4. Patient has experienced symptoms of lumbar disc herniation for more than 6 months
5. Patient has 2 or more symptomatic lumbar disc herniations (presence of non-symptomatic herniations in addition to the symptomatic herniation is allowed)
6. Patient has cauda equina syndrome
7. Previous intradiscal therapeutic intervention of the index disc or has had any lumbar spine surgery
8. Presence of lumbar spine disease and/or clinically significant deformity other than a lumbar disc herniation which, in the opinion of the investigator, will affect evaluation of safety and/or efficacy
9. Untreated, ongoing active infection and/or discitis
10. Current infection or prior history of spinal infection (e.g., discitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess) or an active systemic infection.
11. Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture or trauma.
12. Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis grade 2 and above or spondylolysis at the index or adjacent level(s).
13. Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy affecting the index disc.
14. Patients previously included in the study.
15. Patients suffering from psychosomatic pain in the opinion of the Investigator.
16. Patients requiring continuous treatment with warfarin or other anticoagulant therapy.
17. Known alcohol and/or drug abuse.
18. Pregnant or lactating females, or intention to become pregnant within the study period.
19. Known allergy or intolerance to the contrast agent Omnipaque®.
20. Known opioid allergy or intolerance.
21. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, precludes the patient from taking part in this study.
22. Any specific contraindication for MRI such as claustrophobia, intracranial clips or pacemakers.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Safety and tolerability
timeFrame: Baseline and 1 week and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention for all outcomes except changes in IVD morphology (time frame 1, 3 and 6 months after intervention)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Disc volume
timeFrame: Baseline and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention
measure: Disc height
timeFrame: Baseline and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention
measure: Radicular leg pain
timeFrame: Baseline and 1 week and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention
measure: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
timeFrame: Baseline and 1 week and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention
measure: Disc intensity
timeFrame: Baseline and 1,3 and 6 months after intervention
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Lublin
country: Poland
facility: Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 4, Klinika Ortopedii i Rehabilitacji
state: Lubelskie
Study officials:
affiliation: Stayble Therapeutics AB
name: Jarkko Kalliomäki, MD, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References: