Clinical trial NCT06209645: Non-invasive Personalized Transcranial Cortical Neurostimulation for Pain Relief
Official title: Non-invasive Analgesic Stimulation of the Patient's Motor Cortex With an Oscillating Electric Current at the Dominant Frequency Recorded by EEG
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Drug-resistant Neuropathic Pain
Lead sponsor: Hospices Civils de Lyon
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-01-17
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: The study involves the use of transcranial electrical stimulation applied to the motor cortex at each subject's own cortical rhythm. The rhythm is previously obtained by electroencephalographic (EEG) recording. Fifty adult patients, recruited by the Pain Evaluation and Treatment Center of the Neurological hospital, at the Hospices Civils de Lyon, suffering from drug-resistant neuropathic pain for more than 12 months.

The stimulation (tACS) will be compared head-to-head with another reference active stimulation modality, namely anodal direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex. The 2 types of active stimulation will be performed in cross-over mode, in randomized order, and compared with placebo stimulation.

Each stimulation modality will comprise 6 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, with the first session in placebo mode and the next 5 in active mode.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Neuropathic pain is a public health problem with less than 50% of patients being relieved by drug treatments.

Surgically implanted motor cortex stimulation represents an invasive therapeutic solution capable of relieving a significant proportion of drug-resistant patients (1 in 2); it cannot, however, be offered to all patients, and is not morbidity-free.

Non-invasive motor cortex stimulation techniques have been refined over the last decade, in particular transcranial repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which provide pain relief among almost half of drug-resistant patients with few or no side effects.

To be efficient, cortical stimulation requires the activation of multiple distant networks involved in the cognitive and motivational response to pain; stimulation frequency is a crucial parameter for activating these mechanisms. The match between cortical stimulation frequency and the intrinsic neuronal frequency of the stimulated cortex has recently been suggested as a key determinant of clinical effect. Indeed, the transmission efficiency of an oscillatory network increases when its intrinsic frequency matches that of the stimulus applied to it. Given that human sensorimotor networks spontaneously oscillate at frequencies around 10 and 20 Hertz (Hz), this match could underlie the superior efficacy of transcranial stimulation at these frequencies.

The hypothesis of the study is that the analgesic effect of cortical stimulation will be enhanced if the stimulation frequency resonates with the spontaneous oscillations of the underlying cortex, thus facilitating its connectivity with the remote structures involved in pain control. The investigators propose to test this hypothesis in a population of patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain, referred to the Pain Evaluation and Treatment Center (CETD) of the Neurological hospital, at the Hospices Civils de Lyon. The overall aim of the project is to compare the efficacy of stimulation at each individual's own rate of oscillation of the motor cortex, against a "classic" stimulation protocol, and against placebo stimulation.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Aged 18 to 80 years
* Neuropathic pain of more than one year's duration1
* Failed treatment with tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressants, antiepileptics and a combination of morphine and a serotonin (5HT) norepinephrine (NA2) reuptake inhibitor, in the absence of contraindication.
* Average pain intensity of at least 4/10 in the month preceding the inclusion visit.
* Recipient or beneficiary of a social security scheme-

Exclusion Criteria:

* Chronic non-neuropathic pain or pain associated with progressive pathology, active epilepsy, unhealed scalp wound, impaired comprehension or communication that prevents subjective daily and weekly assessments.
* Active epilepsy, treated or not
* Unhealed scalp wound adjacent to EEG recording electrodes or transcranial stimulation application (contraindication to Medical Device (DM) use)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Inability to understand or follow the ins and outs of the study, in particular the need to assess pain intensity on a daily basis or to trace it, possibly with the help of a third party (comprehension or communication disorders).
* People under guardianship, curatorship or legal protection
* Persons deprived of their liberty, persons under psychiatric care and persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than clinical investigation
* Participation in other research interfering with the present study.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Pain intensity measure
timeFrame: daily from the beginning until the end of the protocol (15 months)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Percentage of responding patients Percentage of patients responding favorably to stimulation (Z-score <-2) after tACS and conventional tDCS.
timeFrame: daily from the beginning until the end of the protocol (15 months)
measure: Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Comparison of weekly standardized values of the PGIC at the end of tACS versus tDCS versus placebo stimulation sessions.
timeFrame: one a week from the beginning until the end of the protocol (15 months)
measure: Fatigue score Comparison of weekly standardized averages of the fatigue score values at the end of tACS versus tDCS versus placebo stimulation sessions.
timeFrame: daily from the beginning until the end of the protocol (15 months)
measure: Sleep score Comparison of weekly standardized averages of the sleep score values at the end of tACS versus tDCS versus placebo stimulation sessions.
timeFrame: daily from the beginning until the end of the protocol (15 months)
measure: Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR) measurement Variation, in patients with hyperalgesia/allodynia, of Sympathetic Skin Response after treatment with tACS versus tDCS versus placebo.
timeFrame: SSR will be measured in allodynic patients before each stimulation and evaluation session, starting with the first stimulation session until the end of the protocol (15 months)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Central Integration of pain lab (NeuroPain); Lyon Neurocience research center
name: Charbel SALAMEH, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: