Clinical trial NCT01006720: Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
Official title: Dose Finding Study for Sugammadex and Neostigmine at Residual Neuromuscular Blockade (T4/T1 = 0.2)
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Residual Neuromuscular Block (TOF-ratio of 0.2)
Keywords: Residual neuromuscular block
post-operative residual curarization
PORC
sugammadex
neostigmine
Lead sponsor: Technical University of Munich
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2009-11-03
Enrollment: 99
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients receiving rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade under general anesthesia

Brief summary: This study is designed to compare recovery times after reversal of a residual neuromuscular block (TOF-ratio 0.2) with different doses of either neostigmine or sugammadex.

Detailed description: Muscle relaxants are integral part of modern anesthesia. They optimize intubating conditions, reduce laryngeal trauma and improve operating conditions. Drawback is a possible pharmacological (muscle relaxing) effect of these drugs beyond the end of the operation (i.e. post-operative residual curarization: PORC). Reportedly about 30% of all patients who received muscle relaxants show signs of PORC when arriving in the post-anesthesia care unit. PORC comprises the risk of impaired post-operative fine motor and coordinative skills with a possible impairment of swallowing pharyngeal secretions with an increased risk of aspiration after extubation. Possible deleterious effects of this could be pneumonia, bronchitis, myocardial infarction, cardiac insufficiency, stroke or re-operation.

In order to avoid PORC patients with residual neuromuscular block receive a muscle relaxant antagonist from the anesthesiologist at the end of the operation. However, these drugs (neostigmine, pyridostigmine, etc.) from the class of cholinesterase inhibitors have unwanted effects such as bradycardia, increased gastro-intestinal motility, post-operative nausea and vomiting, salivation etc. To decrease these unwanted side effects cholinesterase inhibitors have to be given in combination with parasympatholyics e.g. atropine or glycopyrrolate with their own spectrum of unwanted side effects.

From October 2008 on, Sugammadex, a completely new reversal drug was introduced in to clinical practice. Sugammadex, is a modified γ-cyclodextrine able to specifically bind rocuronium (a steroidal muscle relaxant). The complex is eliminated via the kidneys. However, all studies so far have focussed on reversal of profound or deep neuromuscular blockade. This study is designed to compare recovery times after reversal of a residual neuromuscular block (TOF-ratio 0.2) with different doses of either the neostigmine or sugammadex.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients ASA physical status I - III
* Patients over 18 years
* Patients scheduled for general anesthesia with intubation using rocuronium
* Patients having given informed consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

* Anatomic and functional malformations with expected difficult intubation
* Known or suspected neuromuscular disease
* Significant hepatic or renal dysfunction
* Known or suspected history or family history of disposition to malignant hyperthermia
* Known or suspected allergy towards sugammadex, anesthetics, muscle relaxants, or other drugs used for general anesthesia
* Use of drugs that interfere with muscle relaxants
* Patients, included in another trial within the last 30 days
* Patients, with legal guidant
* Patients with contraindication towards the use of Sugammadex, neostigmine or glycopyrrolate
* Patients, which have already participated in a sugammadex trial
* Pregnant women (exclusion of pregnancy: postmenopausal status, negative β- HCG screen, status post tubal ligation)
* Breastfeeding women

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time to TOF-ratio 0.9 following the investigational drug
timeFrame: Regular anesthesia time, approximately 1.5 hours
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Munic
country: Germany
facility: Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
state: Bavaria
Study officials:
affiliation: Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München
name: Heidrun Fink, PD Dr., MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.
citation: Puhringer FK, Rex C, Sielenkamper AW, Claudius C, Larsen PB, Prins ME, Eikermann M, Khuenl-Brady KS. Reversal of profound, high-dose rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex at two different time points: an international, multicenter, randomized, dose-finding, safety assessor-blinded, phase II trial. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):188-97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f5bc7.
citation: Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
citation: Kaufhold N, Schaller SJ, Stauble CG, Baumuller E, Ulm K, Blobner M, Fink H. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.2 (SUNDRO20)dagger, Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):233-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev437.