Clinical trial NCT06939374: Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Official title: Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary Cryotherapy Using the CryoTherapy System (CTS) for High-risk Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
Plaque
Vulnerable Plaque
Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy Effect
Coronary Balloon
Atherosclerosis Coronary Artery With Angina Pectoris
Keywords: Medical device
traditional feasibility
Single Group
Device Feasibility
Multi-Center
Prospective
Interventional
Lead sponsor: Cryotherapeutics SA
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
Collaborators: name: CoreAalst BV
First posted: 2025-04-22
Enrollment: 25
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Prospective, Multi-Center, Interventional, Device Feasibility
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: ICECAP is a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm, interventional, traditional feasibility clinical investigation to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-coronary cryotherapy on vulnerable or high-risk plaque (HRP), using the CryoTherapy System (CTS). The study aims to enroll 25 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, successfully treated for their culprit lesion and with presence of at least one HRP lesion in another vessel. Eligible patients will undergo cryotherapy during a planned procedure. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS and Optical Coherence Tomography imaging will be used during baseline procedure, and during a 9 months follow visit. The primary endpoint is reduction of plaque burden measured as 30% reduction in maxLCBI4mm as measured by NIRS at 9 months post procedure.

Detailed description: ICECAP is a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm, interventional, traditional feasibility clinical investigation to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-coronary cryotherapy on vulnerable or high-risk plaque (HRP), using the CryoTherapy System (CTS). The study aims to enroll 25 patients with stable angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Patients who have undergone successful treatment of their culprit lesion, and in whom presence of at least one non-flow-limiting HRP lesion in another vessel is identified (confirmed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography - CCTA), are eligible for the study. Eligible patients will undergo cryotherapy using the CTS during a planned procedure within maximum 8 weeks after eligibility has been confirmed. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging will be used during baseline procedure, and during a 9 months angiographic follow visit. Clinical follow-up visits will be done at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-procedure. The primary endpoint is reduction of plaque burden, defined as 30% reduction in maxLCBI4mm measured by NIRS at 9 months post procedure. Secondary efficacy endpoints include: changes in fibrous cap thickness assessed by OCT at 9 months post-procedure, changes in Plaque volume and plaque composition at 9 months post-procedure. Safety endpoints include procedural success rates, any cryotherapy related complication or any Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) at 3 and 12 months post procedure. The enrolment period is expected to last 9 months, and all subjects will be followed for 12 months after the CTS procedure.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 1) Subject is at least 18 years old. 2) Subject has acute cardiac pain/angina consistent with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome eligible for coronary angiography meeting one of the following criteria:

  1. Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with rise/fall of cardiac enzymes (troponin I or T) with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit requiring PCI within 72 hours from diagnosis
  2. Unstable angina
  3. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 3) Successful PCI (defined as diameter stenosis less than 30% and TIMI 3 flow on final angiography without procedural complication) of the culprit lesion.

NOTE: subjects with unstable angina, for whom the culprit lesion as assessed by investigator does not require PCI currently or within the next 6 months (subject treated with optimal medical treatment) can be enrolled in the study.

4) Subject has at least one high-risk plaque meeting the criteria below:

1. Located in a non-culprit vessel,
2. High-risk plaque lesion on CCTA and at least one of the following features:

   1. Presence of low-attenuation plaque (HU\<50) and/or
   2. Positive remodelling (remodelling index \>1.1) and/or
   3. Napkin ring sign and/or
   4. Plaque burden ≥70%
3. Lesion length ≤ 20 mm.
4. Diameter stenosis on invasive angiography between 30% and 70% on coronary angiogram or negative physiology assessment (FFR\>0.80 or NHPR\>0.89).
5. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) \< 3.75 mm and \> 2.50 mm in diameter
6. Investigator considers that lesions are accessible.
7. If more than two suitable lesions available, investigator will select the most appropriate lesion for cryotherapy treatment.

   5) maxLCBI4mm in the lesion \> 324.7 6) Subject is able to provide consent and has signed and dated the informed consent form.

   Exclusion Criteria:
   * 1) Subject is hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, hypotension needing inotropes, hypoxia needing intubation, refractory ventricular arrhythmias, and IABP).

     2) Subject has ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. 3) Subject had a procedural complication during the ACS PCI procedure. 4) Subject has history of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or planned CABG within 12 months after the index procedure.

     5) Subject has known reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 30%. 6) Subject has known severe valvular heart disease. 7) Subject has known severe renal insufficiency (eGFR \<30 ml/min/1.72 m2). 8) Subject has any life-threatening conditions or medical comorbidity resulting in life expectancy \< 12 months.

     9) Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.

     10) Subject has severe peripheral vascular disease impeding femoral artery access.

     11) Subject is pregnant or lactating, or NOT surgically sterile (tubal ligation or hysterectomy) or NOT postmenopausal for at least 6 months or is a female with childbearing potential without effective contraception (pill, patch, ring, diaphragm, implant and intrauterine device).

   Angiographic exclusion criteria:
   1. Visible distal embolization/no-reflow following culprit lesions PCI.
   2. Left main coronary artery disease (visual diameter stenosis \> 50%).
   3. Stent thrombosis/restenosis as a culprit lesion.
   4. CTS lesion involving a bifurcation (defined as lesions involving side branches \>2.0 mm).
   5. Angiographic or CCTA evidence of severe calcification and/or marked tortuosity of the index vessel and/or lesion.
   6. Thrombotic lesions.
   7. Ostial lesions.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in MaxLCBI4mm
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in Fibrous Cap Thickness
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline
measure: Change in Minimal Lumen Area (MLA)
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Prevalence of Thin Cap Fibrous Atheroma
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Prevalence of lipid Arc >90°
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Prevalence of lipid Arc >180°
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Prevalence of lipid Arc >270°
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Total angle of macrophage
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Maximum angle of macrophage
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Total angle of lipidic plaque
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Maximum angle of lipidic plaque
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Total angle of calcification
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Maximum angle of calcification
timeFrame: At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Total Plaque volume
timeFrame: At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Calcified Plaque volume
timeFrame: At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
measure: Area stenosis
timeFrame: At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: AZORG Hospital, Aalst, belgium
name: Carlos Collet, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References: