Clinical trial NCT01006733: Genetics Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent DVT
Official title: Genetics Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Thromboembolism
Keywords: pharmacogenetics
arthroplasty
VKORC1
thromboembolism
warfarin
Lead sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
name: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
name: Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
name: University of Utah
name: Rush University Medical Center
name: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
First posted: 2009-11-03
Enrollment: 1598
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 65
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Blood clots contribute to the death of at least 100,000 Americans each year. Because many of these deaths occur suddenly where treatment is impossible, the best treatment is prevention. With this grant, researchers in Missouri, New York, Utah, Illinois, and Texas are developing strategies to improve the safety and effectiveness of clot prevention by customizing a popular blood thinner (warfarin) to each person's genetic and clinical profile. They hypothesize that the use of genetics to guide warfarin therapy will reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) postoperatively. They further hypothesize that using a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.8 is non-inferior to using a target INR of 2.5 in VTE prevention.

Detailed description: The overall objective of the Genetics-InFormatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent DVT is to elucidate novel strategies to improve the safety and effectiveness of warfarin therapy. With this study we directly respond to Health and Human Services (HHS) priorities to advance the field of personalized medicine and to prevent venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease. In 2007, the Honorable Mike Leavitt, Secretary of HHS, announced the Personalized Health Care Initiative and wrote that a key goal was, "... to use our personal genetic information to tailor treatments more effectively to each patient."(1) Recently, President Obama and Francis Collins (Director of the NIH) have made precision medicine a national priority.(2) Previously, the Acting Surgeon General issued a Call to Action to reduce the number of cases of VTE in the United States.(3) To facilitate precision dosing strategies for VTE prevention, we have made publically available a non-profit, web application, www.WarfarinDosing.org. A public version of www.WarfarinDosing.org estimates warfarin doses for the initial 5 days of warfarin therapy. The version being evaluated in GIFT provides doses for the initial 11 days of warfarin therapy.

Aim 1: To determine how pharmacogenetic-based warfarin therapy affects the safety and effectiveness of warfarin therapy. The intensity of anticoagulant therapy is measured by the International Normalized Ratio (INR). During initiation, the INR often falls outside the therapeutic range. INRs that are too low predispose patients to VTE while supratherapeutic INR values increase risk of bleeding.(4, 5) Previously, the FDA approved the label change of warfarin/Coumadin™ to recommend considering lower initial doses in patients known to have certain polymorphisms in genes affecting warfarin metabolism and sensitivity.(6) However, whether this strategy improves the safety and effectiveness of warfarin therapy in general is unknown. In particular, how this strategy affects subgroups with and without the genetic variants of interest is also unknown.

Hypothesis 1: Pharmacogenetic therapy decreases the composite risk of a non-fatal VTE, non-fatal major hemorrhage, death, or INR ≥ 4.0 in all patients, and/or in the subgroup of patients whose pharmacogenetic and clinical predicted therapeutic maintenance doses differ by \> 1.0 mg/day. Based on our meta-analysis of prior trials(7), we anticipate 80% power to simultaneously detect a 32% relative risk reduction in the composite outcome for

Aim 1 (as measured by a chi-square test). In the clinical arm, based on preliminary data, we anticipate that the rate of the composite outcome will be 15.7% in the clinical arm and 10.7% in the pharmacogenetic arm. We obtained these estimates because they average a rate of 13.2%, which is the rate of the composite outcome for Aim 1 observed from the initial 775 GIFT participants. The power was calculated using a two-sided alpha of 0.05 for a test of proportions, a drop-out rate of 2%, and a partitioned (two-sided) alpha with 0.044 allocated to the whole population and 0.01 to the high-risk subgroup. Because of correlation between these two subgroups, using these alphas preserves an overall type 1 error rate of 0.05.

Aim 2: To determine whether warfarin therapy with a target INR of 1.8 is non-inferior to therapy with a target INR of 2.5 at preventing VTE or death in orthopedic patients. One randomized trial (PREVENT) found that a target INR value of 1.5-2.0 prevented 64% of VTE recurrence.(8) Although that trial excluded orthopedic patients, such an approach has been endorsed by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). On page 15 of the 2007 AAOS guidelines (9) they offer the following recommendation for VTE prophylaxis around the time of joint replacement: "Warfarin, with an INR goal of ≤ 2.0, starting either the night before or the night after surgery, for 2-6 weeks." However, the AAOS grade the overall evidence for VTE prophylaxis in this population as low (level III). The AAOS guidelines conflict with the prior American College of Chest Physician (ACCP) guidelines,(10) which recommend, as one of their (Grade 1A) options (page 338 S), using an "...adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (INR target, 2.5; range 2.0 to 3.0)." Because lower target INR values may reduce the risk of hemorrhage and simplify warfarin management(8) we propose to test the following:

Hypothesis 2: For prevention of non-fatal VTE or death, a target INR of 1.8 will be non-inferior to a higher target INR (2.5). Using a non-inferiority margin of 3% absolute risk reduction in non-fatal VTE or death and an estimated composite rate of 5.56% (based on preliminary GIFT data), we will have 83% power to detect the non-inferiority of a target INR of 1.8 in 1600 patients.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 65 years of age or older
* must anticipate taking warfarin for at least 4 weeks for VTE prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty
* must be able to give written, informed consent
* must have venous access
* must not be institutionalized, incarcerated at the time of enrollment (nursing home okay)
* must have life expectancy \> 6 months
* must have plans to have regular INR monitoring
* willing/able to follow-up in 3-7 weeks with a Doppler Ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

* Baseline INR \> 1.35
* knowledge of CYP2C9, VKORC1, or CYP4F2 genotype
* knowledge of warfarin dose requirements from prior warfarin therapy
* absolute contraindication or allergy to warfarin therapy (e.g. pregnancy)
* receiving or planning to receive any anticoagulant besides warfarin (if low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or subcutaneous heparin is deemed necessary by the clinician after enrollment, such patients will be allowed to remain in the study)
* unlikely to be compliant (e.g. due to history of non-compliance, or alcoholism)
* known thrombophilia, bleeding disorder, or history of serious bleed in the past 2 years (unless caused by trauma)
* personal history of venous thromboembolism

Primary outcomes:
measure: For Aim 1: The composite outcome of: non-fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE), non-fatal major hemorrhage, INR>=4.0, and death.
timeFrame: 30-days, except that VTE may be detected up to day 60
measure: For Aim 2: The composite outcome of: non-fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) and death.
timeFrame: 30-days for death; 60 days for VTE
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Percent Time in Therapeutic INR Range
timeFrame: 4-28 days
measure: Composite Outcomes
timeFrame: 30 days for death; 60 days for VTE, major bleed, INR >=4.0.
measure: Ranked Outcomes
timeFrame: 4-28 days for PTTR (INR variability); 30 days for death; 60 days for VTE.
measure: Time to first laboratory event (INR > 1.5 + Target INR)
timeFrame: Maximum of 90 days; median time to last INR is 28 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chicago
country: United States
facility: Rush University Medical Center
state: Illinois
city: Saint Louis
country: United States
facility: Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine
state: Missouri
city: New York
country: United States
facility: Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill-Cornell
state: New York
city: Dallas
country: United States
facility: University of Texas Southwestern
state: Texas
city: Salt Lake City
country: United States
facility: University of Utah
state: Utah
city: Salt Lake City
country: United States
facility: Intermountain Medical Center
state: Utah
Study officials:
affiliation: Washington University School of Medicine
name: Brian F Gage, MD, MSc
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Lenzini P, Wadelius M, Kimmel S, Anderson JL, Jorgensen AL, Pirmohamed M, Caldwell MD, Limdi N, Burmester JK, Dowd MB, Angchaisuksiri P, Bass AR, Chen J, Eriksson N, Rane A, Lindh JD, Carlquist JF, Horne BD, Grice G, Milligan PE, Eby C, Shin J, Kim H, Kurnik D, Stein CM, McMillin G, Pendleton RC, Berg RL, Deloukas P, Gage BF. Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;87(5):572-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.13. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
citation: Ferder NS, Eby CS, Deych E, Harris JK, Ridker PM, Milligan PE, Goldhaber SZ, King CR, Giri T, McLeod HL, Glynn RJ, Gage BF. Ability of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 to predict therapeutic warfarin dose during the initial weeks of therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;8(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03677.x. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
citation: King CR, Deych E, Milligan P, Eby C, Lenzini P, Grice G, Porche-Sorbet RM, Ridker PM, Gage BF. Gamma-glutamyl carboxylase and its influence on warfarin dose. Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):750-4. doi: 10.1160/TH09-11-0763. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
citation: Finkelman BS, Gage BF, Johnson JA, Brensinger CM, Kimmel SE. Genetic warfarin dosing: tables versus algorithms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;57(5):612-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.643.
citation: Johnson JA, Gong L, Whirl-Carrillo M, Gage BF, Scott SA, Stein CM, Anderson JL, Kimmel SE, Lee MT, Pirmohamed M, Wadelius M, Klein TE, Altman RB; Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guidelines for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;90(4):625-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.185. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
citation: Horne BD, Lenzini PA, Wadelius M, Jorgensen AL, Kimmel SE, Ridker PM, Eriksson N, Anderson JL, Pirmohamed M, Limdi NA, Pendleton RC, McMillin GA, Burmester JK, Kurnik D, Stein CM, Caldwell MD, Eby CS, Rane A, Lindh JD, Shin JG, Kim HS, Angchaisuksiri P, Glynn RJ, Kronquist KE, Carlquist JF, Grice GR, Barrack RL, Li J, Gage BF. Pharmacogenetic warfarin dose refinements remain significantly influenced by genetic factors after one week of therapy. Thromb Haemost. 2012 Feb;107(2):232-40. doi: 10.1160/TH11-06-0388. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
citation: Do EJ, Lenzini P, Eby CS, Bass AR, McMillin GA, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Pendleton RC, Anderson JL, Proctor P, Nunley RM, Davila-Roman V, Gage BF. Genetics informatics trial (GIFT) of warfarin to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT): rationale and study design. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Oct;12(5):417-24. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.18. Epub 2011 May 24.
citation: Kawai VK, Cunningham A, Vear SI, Van Driest SL, Oginni A, Xu H, Jiang M, Li C, Denny JC, Shaffer C, Bowton E, Gage BF, Ray WA, Roden DM, Stein CM. Genotype and risk of major bleeding during warfarin treatment. Pharmacogenomics. 2014 Dec;15(16):1973-83. doi: 10.2217/pgs.14.153.
citation: Bass AR, Rodriguez T, Hyun G, Santiago FG, Kim JI, Woller SC, Gage BF. Myocardial ischaemia after hip and knee arthroplasty: incidence and risk factors. Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):2011-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2853-0. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
citation: Hyun G, Li J, Bass AR, Mohapatra A, Woller SC, Lin H, Eby C, McMillin GA, Gage BF. Use of signals and systems engineering to improve the safety of warfarin initiation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Nov;42(4):529-33. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1402-z.
citation: Gage BF, Bass AR, Lin H, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Al-Hammadi N, Anderson JL, Li J, Rodriguez T Jr, Miller JP, McMillin GA, Pendleton RC, Jaffer AK, King CR, Whipple B, Porche-Sorbet R, Napoli L, Merritt K, Thompson AM, Hyun G, Hollomon W, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Moskowitz G, Davila-Roman V, Eby CS. Effect of Low-Intensity vs Standard-Intensity Warfarin Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism or Death Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):834-842. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12085.
citation: Gage BF, Bass AR, Lin H, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Al-Hammadi N, Li J, Rodriguez T Jr, Miller JP, McMillin GA, Pendleton RC, Jaffer AK, King CR, Whipple BD, Porche-Sorbet R, Napoli L, Merritt K, Thompson AM, Hyun G, Anderson JL, Hollomon W, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Moskowitz G, Davila-Roman V, Eby CS. Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The GIFT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 26;318(12):1115-1124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11469.