Clinical trial NCT04011787: The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study
Official title: The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Stroke
Dysphagia
Lead sponsor: University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-07-08
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: 20 patients will be randomised to two arms with a control group of a further 10 patients
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Tube feeding can be given by the intermittent (bolus) method, whereby the feed is given over a short time (15 to 30 minutes), or by the continuous feeding method, where the feed is given continuously over 10-16 hours. Nasogastric feeding can be complicated by vomiting or reflux of the feed into the oesophagus causing aspiration of gastric contents into the lung and pneumonia. Nasogastric feeds can be given continuously or as bolus feeds. Healthy people eating normally take their diet in discrete meals. The human digestive system is adapted to intermittent food intake and is likely to work best if food is provided in this pattern, but the larger volume of the feed by this method may cause vomiting and aspiration. It is unclear which method is better for allowing normal digestive processes and reducing pneumonia due to aspirated feeds. There are no trials comparing these two feeding methods in patients with acute stroke. The aim of this small study is to determine if a trial comparing the two treatment approaches is feasible in patients with acute stroke, and to collect information on the effects on feed tolerance and digestion.

In this study we will compare the effect of the bolus and intermittent nasogastric tube feeding on digestion and feed tolerance in 20 patients who need nasogastric feeding within 36 hours of a stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. During this time they will be examined every day. The study will examine how effectively food is digested by measuring the amount of feed given and the metabolic responses of the body by looking at changes in the level of blood sugar and digestive hormones. The investigators will also monitor complications such as vomiting, diarrhoea, and pneumonia. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days.

This will provide information which will allow the investigators to design a larger definitive study to conclusively prove which method is more appropriate.

Detailed description: Patients admitted to the acute stroke unit at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust and who require nasogastric (NG) feeding will be eligible for recruitment, patients will be screened and assessed for eligibility on the stroke unit by a member of the local research team, confirmed by a medical practitioner.

Consent- Informed consent will be sought from patients after full oral and written information about the nature and purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, alternative treatments, and the right to refuse and to withdraw at any time. In cases where the patient lacks the capacity to give fully informed consent, the patient will be informed as much as he/she is able to understand with the option to refuse, and fully informed consent will be sought from a consultee. The oral and written information will be provided to the consultee including the same information as would be given to the patient. If the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but unable to sign because of impairments; verbal consent, witnessed and signed by an independent observer, will be documented. Where the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but only able to make a mark on the paper rather than sign as required, the same procedure will be followed. Confirmation of consent will be sought in patients who are recruited with consent from a consultee, but regain capacity prior to the end of the trial.

Due to the nature of the study, patients or their consultee will have to decide within a few hours of admission to hospital. They will be given the opportunity to discuss the study with a relative or friend. Participants or their consultee will be free to withdraw from the trial at any time without giving reasons and without prejudicing further treatment.

An age-matched healthy control group will be recruited from patients' relatives and friends to provide a normal baseline for the metabolic response to normal feeding.

The original signed consent form will be filed in the case report form. One copy will be given to the patient or consultee, another copy will be sent to the trial coordinating centre and another will be filed in the patients' notes.

The participant information sheets, and consent forms, will not be available in other languages. If needed, the usual hospital interpreter and translator services will be available to assist with discussion of the trial.

If a participant is able to consent for the study but later becomes incapacitated, the original consent will endure the loss of capacity as long as the trial has not significantly altered since the original consent was given.

Randomisation- Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control groups using a computerized random number generator. The randomization procedure will be conducted by an independent statistician at Keele University. Sealed and numbered opaque envelopes containing the allocated intervention will be kept in the research office on the acute stroke ward. For each randomisation the envelope with the lowest number will be used. The envelopes will be selected and opened by the research nurse following consent and baseline assessment. An email containing the Participant ID and the number of the envelope will be sent to the Principal Investigator. A copy of the original randomisation codes will be kept independently by the sponsor in the Trial Master File. Assessments-

* A daily log of symptoms and signs of feed intolerance and pneumonia will be taken for 7 days.
* A venous blood sample for a full blood count and C-reactive Protein will be taken on day 1, 3, and 7.
* A Chest x-Ray will be conducted on day 7 to confirm/exclude evidence of pneumonia.
* Glucose level measurements will be taken every 10 minutes for each participant for 5 days following randomisation, using a sensor inserted into the subcutaneous tissue by the trained research nurse.
* Daily for 5 days following randomisation fasting venous plasma glucose, apart from the day that the hormonal profile is collected, samples are to be taken by the research nurse and processed by the pathology department.
* All participants, including healthy controls, will have a hormonal profile in response to feeding will be taken on day 4, post randomisation. The continuous feed, the bolus feed or, in the non-stroke control group, a calorific drink that is equivalent calories to the Naso-Gastric feed (e.g. Ensure plus) will be given as the first meal in the morning after an overnight fast. Venous plasma glucose and insulin levels will be checked both fasting, immediately after the meal, and every 30 minutes in response to NG feed for 4 hours after the meal (total of 10 sets of samples per subject, each set comprising 2ml clotted sample and 1ml fluoride oxalate sample). For patients who are on NG feeding, the sample collection will similarly start at -30 and 0 minute before the NG feed (either bolus or continuous feed) and then every 30 minutes for 4 hours (total of 10 samples). The venous plasma glucose sample collected for the hormonal profile will also be used for the daily fasting venous plasma glucose sample (see above). We will primarily calculate the time averaged mean insulin and glucose responses computed as incremental AUCs (above baseline), divided by the time interval (hours). Values at each individual time point will be compared directly. The investigators will also collect data on total glycaemic exposure (glucose AUC 0-240) and the insulinogenic index (ΔI30/ΔG30) as an index of β-cell response.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age \>=18 years
* Within 36 h hospital admission with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke
* Dysphagia requiring nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding (assessed by failed sip test)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Moribund, receiving palliative care
* Clinical diagnosis of pneumonia
* Pre-existing gastric motility problems
* Inability to obtain consent from the patients or their representative

Primary outcomes:
measure: Feed tolerance
timeFrame: 7 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Number of glucose excursions above 7mmol/L
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: mean glucose levels
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: glucose centiles
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: total area under curve (AUC)
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: diurnal AUC
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: nocturnal AUC
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: average duration of specific glucose readings
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: average hourly change
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: inter-day variability
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: largest amplitude of glycaemic excursions
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: postprandial amplitude of glycaemic excursions
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: the time-averaged mean insulin and glucose responses
timeFrame: 5 hours
measure: total glycaemic exposure
timeFrame: 5 hours
measure: the insulinogenic index
timeFrame: 5 hours
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Stoke-on-Trent
country: United Kingdom
facility: University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
state: Staffordshire
Study officials:
affiliation: Consultant
name: Fahmy Hanna
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: