Clinical trial NCT02427022: Implementation, Fidelity, and Outcomes Following Novel and Usual Critical Time Intervention Training
Official title: Phase II Evidence-Based Practice in Community-Based Social Work: A Multi-Media Strategy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Homeless Services
Human Services Training
Keywords: evidence based practices, critical time intervention
Lead sponsor: Center for Social Innovation, Massachusetts
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Columbia University
name: Hunter College of City University of New York
First posted: 2015-04-27
Enrollment: 179
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: Clinical social workers and other staff providing direct care to individuals experiencing homelessness face multiple challenges in obtaining training and implementing evidence-based practices in diverse community settings. Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is an increasingly popular evidence based practice with these agencies.

With funding from a Phase II Small Business Innovation Research grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, the Center for Social Innovation developed an online multi-media training on CTI which incorporates a Community of Practice approach to encourage peer-based learning.

The primary aim of this longitudinal, randomized-control study is to compare and contrast this online training modality with a face-to-face training on implementation of and fidelity to the CTI model over time. Nearly two-hundred direct service providers from 20 homeless-service agencies were randomly assigned to complete either an online or face-to-face training in CTI. Pre-post training and knowledge-retention surveys, interviews with trainers, agency administrators, and providers were conducted to track satisfaction with the training and experiences in implementing CTI. CTI-specific chart forms are used to assess fidelity to the CTI model, and administrative data from the agencies capture client-level outcomes.

Detailed description: In September 2008, the Center for Social Innovation (C4) was awarded a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) contract from the National Institute of Mental Health to test innovative ways to disseminate evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community settings. C4 selected the practice of Critical Time Intervention (CTI), a focused, time-limited case management model designed to prevent and end homelessness among people who have experienced mental illness, addiction, and trauma. CTI is widely recognized as an evidence-based practice. During Phase 1 of the project, C4 partnered with CTI experts at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health to develop and test a prototype version of an instructor-led online course that brought together live (synchronous) and multimedia self-paced (asynchronous) elements to train community-based social workers on the CTI model. The pilot study showed promising results in the areas of knowledge gain, knowledge retention, and confidence to implement the model. Based on these preliminary findings, C4 applied for Phase 2 funding, which was granted in September 2010.

Phase 2 of the study was completed in February 2013. This phase of the study included full product development of the online course and a randomized controlled trial comparing the online course with face-to-face CTI training (provided by our partners at the Center for Urban Community Services or CUCS). Specifically, the study included 179 service providers from 19 agencies across the United States and Canada. We randomly assigned each agency to one of two study conditions: 1) online training + community of practice, or 2) face-to-face training + telephone coaching. After they completed the training, we examined satisfaction with the training modalities, knowledge gains and knowledge retention. We then followed agencies' CTI implementation process and assessed CTI implementation readiness, experiences in implementing CTI, fidelity to the CTI model over time, and the impact of CTI implementation on the clients served by these agencies.

Eligibility criteria: Agency Inclusion Criteria:

1. Possessing administrative-level support for implementing CTI within the agency
2. Capability of engaging at least one CTI team in training
3. Willingness to engage in evaluation
4. A willingness to collect and share administrative client data

Agency Exclusion Criteria:

1. Not possessing administrative support
2. Not capable of of engaging at least one CTI team in training
3. Not willing to engage in evaluation
4. Not willing to collect and share administrative client data

Provider Inclusion Criteria:

1. Capacity to fill one of the three roles necessary for CTI team membership or eligibility to shift into those roles: Supervisor, Field Coordinator, or CTI Worker; and,
2. Willingness to engage in the CTI training and the study activities.

Provider Exclusion Criteria:

1. Individuals not working as a supervisor, field coordinator or CTI Worker within an eligible service organization.
2. Individuals not willing to engage in CTI training and study activities.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in confidence in CTI principles [attitudinal]
timeFrame: Pre and post surveys (June and July, 2011; weeks 1 and 2)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Training format preference [attitudinal]
timeFrame: Prior to intervention (June, 2011; week 1)
measure: Participant satisfaction [attitudinal]
timeFrame: Post interventions (July, 2011; week 2)
measure: Participant satisfaction [attitudinal]
timeFrame: Post intervention (March 2012; week 2)
measure: Confidence in readiness to implement CTI principles [attitudinal]
timeFrame: Post intervention (June 2011; week 2)
measure: Knowledge retention [knowledge]
timeFrame: Pre, post and follow up surveys weeks post training and six months post training (June 2011 and December 2011; weeks 1, 2 and 24)
measure: Fidelity to CTI model
timeFrame: Post implementation (March 2012, June 2012, September 2012; weeks 40, 52, and 64)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Needham
country: United States
facility: Center for Social Innovation
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Center for Social Innovation
name: Jeffrey Olivet, MA
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: da Silva, T. F. C., Lovisi, G. M. & Conover, S. (2014) Developing an instrument for assessing fidelity to the intervention in the Critical Time Intervention - Task Shifting (CTI-TS): Preliminary report. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 1: 55-62.
citation: Aarons GA. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Ment Health Serv Res. 2004 Jun;6(2):61-74. doi: 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65.