Clinical trial NCT06131281: Comparing Reduction With ESD- Versus APC-TORe
Official title: Comparing Outcomes of Classic Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe) Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-TORe: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Obesity
Roux-en-y Anastomosis Site
Weight Gain
Lead sponsor: The Cleveland Clinic
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-11-14
Enrollment: 70
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two variations of the same procedure used to assist with weight loss in patients who have a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who have experienced weight regain. The procedure being studied is called the Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe), and the trial will compare two different ways to complete the TORe procedure. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Which variation of the TORe procedure results in more weight loss?
* Which variation of the TORe is safer? Participants who are eligible and willing to undergo the TORe procedure to assist with weight loss will have the procedure completed either one of the two ways. All other care will be exactly the same between the two groups. Researchers will compare outcomes between the two procedure variations, looking at which one results in more weight loss, is more successful, and safer.

Detailed description: Weight regain after having a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is common. One of the primary reasons for weight regain after bypass is stretching out or "dilation" of the surgical connection created between what is left of the stomach and the small intestine (called the anastamosis). As the ability to suture with the help of a scope inserted through the mouth into the stomach instead of surgery, the transoral outlet reduction (TORe) was developed. The TORe involves suturing around the stretched out anastamosis, allowing it to be pulled tighter and shrink down, resulting in weight loss, and is an entirely endoscopic and reversible procedure. As the procedure advanced, "burning" of the stomach lining using a technique called argon plasma coagulation (APC), in addition to suturing, became the standard way to perform the TORe procedure. The APC helps the stomach tissue shrink even more and heal into place better, causing even more weight loss. This is now the classic way to perform the TORe (hereby called the "c-TORe"), and is now widely used to help patients who have regained weight after gastric bypass.

Multiple studies report the c-TORe results in an average of 8-9% total body weight loss. However more recently, another variation of the TORe was developed, which uses endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In the ESD-TORe (hereby called the E-TORe), the physician makes a small cut in the surface layer of the anastamosis in addition to APC and suturing. In the only study comparing c-TORe to E-TORe, E-TORe resulted in significantly more weight loss. However, there are several limitations to this study that require more investigation.

This clinical trial will compare the c-TORe and the E-TORe. Patients who are eligible and willing to undergo a TORe procedure will be assigned to get either the c-TORe or the E-TORe. They will undergo the procedure with a physician experienced in both types of the procedure. Participants will be followed for one year after the procedure to compare which procedure type results in more weight loss.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients with history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and weight regain
* Dilated gastrojejunal anastamosis as diagnosed on endoscopy
* Patients undergoing standard of care for treatment of obesity with endoscopic revisional procedure (a.k.a. TORe) who are enrolled in the GI Bariatric Endoscopy program and clinic at the study site

Exclusion Criteria:

* Prior revision of gastric bypass
* Active and uncontrolled gastro-esophageal reflux disease defined as ≥ grade C esophagitis
* Active untreated Helicobacter pylori infection
* Malignancy newly diagnosed by endoscopy
* Upper gastro-intestinal conditions such as ulcers, polyps, gastric varices, strictures, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasia or other abnormalities that preclude completion of TORe
* Presence of gastrogastric or gastroenteric fistula
* Inability to undergo general anesthesia
* Participating in another ongoing clinical trial of an investigational weight loss drug or device
* Active pregnancy
* Use of anticoagulation therapy or P2Y12 inhibitors which cannot be discontinued for the time frame surrounding the procedure
* Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
* Unwillingness to comply with standard post-TORe dietary guidelines and follow-up care
* Any other anatomical, technical or otherwise factor that limits the ability of the endoscopist to perform either E-TORe or c-TORe
* Any additional factor, which in the investigator's opinion, might jeopardize the subject's safety or compliance with the trial protocol

Primary outcomes:
measure: Weight change at 6 months
timeFrame: 6 months from procedure date
measure: Weight change at 12 months
timeFrame: 12 months from procedure date
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Technical success
timeFrame: Day of procedure
measure: Procedure time
timeFrame: Day of procedure
measure: Adverse event rate
timeFrame: One year from date of procedure
measure: 5% total body weight loss
timeFrame: One year from date of procedure
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cleveland
country: United States
facility: Cleveland Clinic Foundation
state: Ohio
Study officials:
affiliation: The Cleveland Clinic
name: C. Roberto Simons-Linares, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Clapp B, Ponce J, DeMaria E, Ghanem O, Hutter M, Kothari S, LaMasters T, Kurian M, English W. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Sep;18(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.06.284. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
citation: Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, Sharma AM, de Gara C, Birch DW. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1922-33. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1070-4.
citation: El Ansari W, Elhag W. Weight Regain and Insufficient Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: Definitions, Prevalence, Mechanisms, Predictors, Prevention and Management Strategies, and Knowledge Gaps-a Scoping Review. Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1755-1766. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05160-5. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
citation: Athanasiadis DI, Martin A, Kapsampelis P, Monfared S, Stefanidis D. Factors associated with weight regain post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4069-4084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08329-w. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
citation: Bastos EC, Barbosa EM, Soriano GM, dos Santos EA, Vasconcelos SM. Determinants of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013;26 Suppl 1:26-32. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000600007. English, Portuguese.
citation: Runge TM, Jirapinyo P, Chan WW, Thompson CC. Dysphagia predicts greater weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a longitudinal case-matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Dec;15(12):2045-2051. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.041. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
citation: Abu Dayyeh BK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC. Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Mar;9(3):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
citation: Jense MTF, Palm-Meinders IH, Sigterman-Nelissen R, Boerma EG, Liem RSL, Swank DJ, Greve JWM. The Benefits of Banded over Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Morbid Obesity: a Multi-center Study. Obes Surg. 2022 Jun;32(6):1856-1863. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06024-w. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
citation: Thompson CC, Chand B, Chen YK, DeMarco DC, Miller L, Schweitzer M, Rothstein RI, Lautz DB, Slattery J, Ryan MB, Brethauer S, Schauer P, Mitchell MC, Starpoli A, Haber GB, Catalano MF, Edmundowicz S, Fagnant AM, Kaplan LM, Roslin MS. Endoscopic suturing for transoral outlet reduction increases weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jul;145(1):129-137.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
citation: Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, AlSamman MA, Thompson CC. Five-year outcomes of transoral outlet reduction for the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1067-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.044. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
citation: Schulman AR, Kumar N, Thompson CC. Transoral outlet reduction: a comparison of purse-string with interrupted stitch technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1222-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
citation: Dhindsa BS, Saghir SM, Naga Y, Dhaliwal A, Ramai D, Cross C, Singh S, Bhat I, Adler DG. Efficacy of transoral outlet reduction in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1332-E1340. doi: 10.1055/a-1214-5822. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
citation: Jirapinyo P, de Moura DTH, Thompson CC. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with suturing for the treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass: outcomes and comparison with traditional transoral outlet reduction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jun;91(6):1282-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
citation: Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.
citation: Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
citation: Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.