Clinical trial NCT04076189: Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
Official title: Time of Initiation of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid: a Cross-over Randomized, Control Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Infant, Newborn, Disease
Neonatal Resuscitation
Keywords: Infant newborn
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Neonatal Resuscitation
Positive Pressure Ventilation
Lead sponsor: University Hospital Padova
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: University of Padova
First posted: 2019-09-03
Enrollment: 40
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored.

Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin.

Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.

Detailed description: Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored.

Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin.

Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be eligible to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

* No exclusion criteria

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time of initiation of positive pressure ventilation
timeFrame: 3 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Padova
country: Italy
facility: Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, University of Padova
city: Padova
country: Italy
facility: University of Padova
Study officials:
References:
citation: Wyllie J, Bruinenberg J, Roehr CC, Rudiger M, Trevisanuto D, Urlesberger B. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 7. Resuscitation and support of transition of babies at birth. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:249-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Oct 15. No abstract available.
citation: Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Simon WM, Weiner GM, Zaichkin JG. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S543-60. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267. No abstract available.
citation: Chettri S, Adhisivam B, Bhat BV. Endotracheal Suction for Nonvigorous Neonates Born through Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2015 May;166(5):1208-1213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.076. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
citation: Nangia S, Sunder S, Biswas R, Saili A. Endotracheal suction in term non vigorous meconium stained neonates-A pilot study. Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 30.
citation: Chiruvolu A, Miklis KK, Chen E, Petrey B, Desai S. Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support. Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6):e20181485. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1485. Epub 2018 Nov 1.