Clinical trial NCT03272087: Rational Approach to a Unilateral Pleural Effusion
Official title: Rational Approach to Unilateral Pleural Effusion in Patients Suspected of Malignancy. Efficacy, Pain, Quality of Life, and Economy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Lung Neoplasms
Keywords: Thoracoscopy
Lead sponsor: Naestved Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: University of Southern Denmark
name: Odense University Hospital
name: Zealand University Hospital
name: University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
name: Bispebjerg Hospital
name: Rigshospitalet, Denmark
First posted: 2017-09-05
Enrollment: 120
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: Recurrent unilateral, non-infectious pleural exudate is suspicious for primary or secondary pleural malignancy. Both conditions are associated with 5-year survival of 10%. Work-up is difficult, as the pleural surface is large and \<33% of pleural malignancies shed malignant cells to the pleural fluid. Even so, additional tissue biopsies are needed for establishing mutation status for targeted therapies.

Optimal imaging to guide tissue sampling is pivotal. PET-CT has higher sensitivity than conventional CT for detecting malignant lesions \>10mm. However, no randomised trial has investigated differences in diagnostic accuracy, time-to-diagnosis, or economics. Falsely PET-positive lesions in e.g. colon, however, lead to more derived tests than do CT alone.

Gold standard for pleural tissue sampling is the surgical (VATS) thoracoscopy, allowing direct visual guiding of tissue sampling from all pleural surfaces. Yet, globally the medical (pleuroscopy) thoracoscopy is more widely used: cheaper, outpatient procedure, but allows only sampling from the parietal pleura. To date, no randomised studies have compared medical and surgical thoracoscopy concerning diagnostic hit rates, adverse events, or economics.

Investigators will perform two randomized studies to investigate whether

1. PET/CT is comparable to CT alone
2. VATS is comparable to pleuroscopy concerning hit rate, total investigations performed, time-to-diagnosis.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with recurrent pleural effusion of unknown origin after a first pleural tap according to BTS guidelines.
2. Indication for thoracoscopy according to BTS guidelines.
3. Patients accept further investigation according to Danish and BTS guidelines.
4. Have received oral and written consent and agreed.
5. At the time of inclusion, above 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Female patients: pregnancy or breastfeeding.
2. Lack of language comprehension.
3. Legally incompetent patients.
4. Life expectancy less than 3 month.
5. Contraindications to pleural tissue sampling.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Number of patients diagnosed with cancer
timeFrame: 2 years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Quality of life
timeFrame: 1 month
measure: Total costs
timeFrame: 2 years
measure: Pain
timeFrame: 2 years
measure: Quality of life
timeFrame: 1 month
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Naestved
country: Denmark
facility: Naestved Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Syddansk Universitet
name: Uffe Boedtger, MD, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References: