Clinical trial NCT05655169: Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Official title: Effectiveness of Piezocision or the Combination of Piezocision and Low-level Laser Therapy on Orthodontic Tooth Movement During En-masse Retraction and the Associated Dentoalveolar Changes: A Three-arm Randomized Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Angle Class II
Lead sponsor: Damascus University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-12-19
Enrollment: 63
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 17
Maximum age (years): 28
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Sixty patients who need extraction-based treatment of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth will be divided randomly into three groups: piezocision group, piezocision with low-level laser therapy group, and control group. In each group, after the levelling and alignment phase is completed, the rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") will be inserted, then after two weeks, the en masse retraction will be started via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side. For anchorage, mini implants will be inserted between the second premolars and the first molar on each side.

Detailed description: Regarding the Piezocision, vertical soft-tissue incisions will be made on the buccal and palatal gingiva. One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and the second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and start 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla. Then a piezosurgery knife will be inserted to perform the cortical alveolar incisions with 3-mm in-depth and 8 mm in length. No suturing will be needed.

Regarding the piezocision with the later application of low-level laser therapy (LLLT):

After six weeks of piezosurgery, a diode laser (wavelength: 810 nm and exposure time of 10 seconds\\point) 10 seconds per point will be applied on each tooth of the six maxillary anterior teeth according to this protocol: the root will be divided theoretically into two halves; gingival and cervical, and the laser will be applied in the center of each half from both buccal and palatal sides which means four application points and total energy of 16 Joules per tooth. LLLT irradiation will be performed in the sixth week after the onset of mass retraction (day 0). After that, irradiation is repeated on days 3, 7, and 14, then every two weeks, until the class I canine relationship is achieved and/or spaces lateral to incisors are closed

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Age range: 17-28 years.
2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion :

   * Mild/moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle ≤7)
   * Overjet ≤10
   * Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles: mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle, and facial axis angle)
   * Mild to moderate crowding ≤ 4
3. Permanent occlusion.
4. Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars).
5. Good oral and periodontal health:

   * Probing depth \< 4 mm
   * No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
   * Gingival index ≤ 1
   * Plaque index ≤ 1

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ...)
2. Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
3. Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars).
4. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:

   * Probing depth ≥ 4 mm
   * radiographic evidence of bone loss
   * Gingival index \> 1
   * Plaque index \> 1
5. The patient had previous orthodontic treatment

Primary outcomes:
measure: The rate of en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth
timeFrame: This will be assessed at the end of the active treatment, which is expected to occur within five months
measure: Change in the anteroposterior movement of the molar
timeFrame: Time 0:1 day before the beginning of the retraction phase (baseline). Time 1: after 1 month from the beginning. Time 2: after 2 months. Time 3: after 3 months. Time 4: after 4 months. Time 5: immediately after the end of the retraction phase
measure: Change in the inter-canine width
timeFrame: Time 0:1 day before the beginning of the retraction phase (baseline). Time 1: after 1 month from the beginning. Time 2: after 2 months. Time 3: after 3 months. Time 4: after 4 months. Time 5: immediately after the end of the retraction phase
measure: Change in the inter-molar width at 5 months
timeFrame: Time 0:1 day before the beginning of the retraction phase (baseline). Time 1: after 1 month from the beginning. Time 2: after 2 months. Time 3: after 3 months. Time 4: after 4 months. Time 5: immediately after the end of the retraction phase
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in molar antero-posterior position
timeFrame: Time 0:1 day before the beginning of the retraction phase (baseline). Time 1: after 1 month from the beginning. Time 2: after 2 months. Time 3: after 3 months. Time 4: after 4 months. Time 5: immediately after the end of the retraction phase
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Damascus
country: Syrian Arab Republic
facility: University of Damascus
Study officials:
affiliation: Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
name: Mudar Mohammad Mousa, DDS
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
name: Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Abdelhameed AN, Refai WMM. Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Low Energy Laser Application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the Effect of Application of Each Technique Separately On the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 15;6(11):2180-2185. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.386. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
citation: Alfawal AMH, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B, Latifeh Y. Evaluation of patient-centered outcomes associated with the acceleration of canine retraction by using minimally invasive surgical procedures: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):285-293. doi: 10.17219/dmp/120181.
citation: Hatrom AA, Zawawi KH, Al-Ali RM, Sabban HM, Zahid TM, Al-Turki GA, Hassan AH. Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction. Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):648-654. doi: 10.2319/092719-615.1.
citation: Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Alkhouri I, Zinah E. Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
citation: Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Nov 4.