Clinical trial NCT06646939: Comparison of Community Reintegration Interventions When Using a Simulated Environment
Official title: Comparison of Community Reintegration Interventions Relative to the Institution of a Simulated Environment in Inpatient Rehabilitation and Pilot Study of the Impact of Simulated Environment on Functional Outcomes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Simulated Environments for Community Reintegration
Keywords: Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit
Community Reintegration
Simulated Environment
Lead sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Hunter College of The City University of New York
First posted: 2024-10-17
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The investigators believe that rehabilitation specialists will use community reintegration treatments more if a simulated environment is available.

Detailed description: Community reintegration training has always been a significant aspect of inpatient rehabilitation recovery. Community reintegration training involved therapists and patients going into the actual community to evaluate and practice their functional tasks such as negotiating curbs, crosswalks, or marketplaces. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this option was not available. The absence of this intervention made it challenging for therapists to evaluate a patient's safety to return home. Creating a simulated environment within the inpatient rehabilitation department became an alternative to taking patients to an outside environment. Saji, et al. (2015) demonstrated that utilization of a simulated environment enhanced functional improvements of post-acute stroke patients at 12 convalescent rehabilitation wards. New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center (NYP- WCMC) has constructed a simulated environment for the purposes of enhancing community reintegration training. This project will test its use and efficacy.

The availability of this simulated environment may be more time-efficient and safer than community reintegration training outside of the department or hospital. Training in the simulated environment may improve the functional ability of individuals undergoing inpatient rehabilitation, in accordance with the degree of use of the simulated environment. Greater use of the simulated environment may predict greater functional improvements. This study will collect pilot data about functional outcomes and patient perspectives about their balance confidence, their ability to perform functional tasks, and the efficacy of the use of simulated environment for community reintegration. This pilot data will seed a future efficacy study with a comparison group.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019 will be queried for number of minutes billed for Community Integration.
* Medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from April 2
* Patients admitted to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit (IRU) of at least 18 years of age and older
* Patients who can read and provide informed consent in English.
* Patients who will be discharged to home after inpatient rehabilitation.
* Patients who are ambulatory with a minimal QI score of 3 on "Walk 10 feet".
* Patients who utilized the simulated environment during their inpatient stay.
* Patients who score 8 or greater on the BIMS on initial evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria:

* The investigators will exclude medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021 because of the COVID restrictions that were in place.
* Patients who are less than 18 years of age.
* Patients who are not ambulatory due to medical reasons.
* Patients who cannot read and provide informed consent in English.
* Patients who were discharged to acute care, skilled nursing facility or long-term care facility after their inpatient rehabilitation stay.
* Patients who did not use the simulated environment during their inpatient stay.
* Patients who score 7 or lower on the BIMS on initial evaluation.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Utilization of community reintegration, as measured by number of 15-minute units billed
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Quality Indicators
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Quality Indicators
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Quality Indicators
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Quality Indicators
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Gait Speed
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
measure: Patient satisfaction
timeFrame: Date of Discharge (at approximately Day 11)
measure: Patient satisfaction
timeFrame: 30 days post discharge
measure: Length of Stay
timeFrame: Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: New York
country: United States
facility: NewYork Presbyterian Hospital Baker Pavilion
state: New York
Study officials:
affiliation: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
name: Nasim Chowdhury, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):15-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15.
citation: Saliba D, Buchanan J, Edelen MO, Streim J, Ouslander J, Berlowitz D, Chodosh J. MDS 3.0: brief interview for mental status. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
citation: Richardson J, Law M, Wishart L, Guyatt G. The use of a simulated environment (easy street) to retrain independent living skills in elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Oct;55(10):M578-84. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.10.m578.
citation: Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.
citation: Peel NM, Kuys SS, Klein K. Gait speed as a measure in geriatric assessment in clinical settings: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):39-46. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls174. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
citation: Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2.
citation: Karssemeijer EGA, Aaronson JA, Bossers WJ, Smits T, Olde Rikkert MGM, Kessels RPC. Positive effects of combined cognitive and physical exercise training on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2017 Nov;40:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
citation: Eyssen IC, Beelen A, Dedding C, Cardol M, Dekker J. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):888-94. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr883oa.