Clinical trial NCT03168880: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Weekly Carboplatin In Women With Large Operable or Locally Advanced, Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Weekly Paclitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Weekly Carboplatin In Women With Large Operable or Locally Advanced, Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Lead sponsor: Tata Memorial Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2017-05-30
Enrollment: 720
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The study will test platinum based chemotherapy against the standard taxane based chemotherapy in the neo adjuvant setting as below:

Arm A: Paclitaxel (weekly \*8) + AE/EC 3 weekly \*4 followed by Surgery + RT Arm B: Paclitaxel+ Carboplatin (weekly \*8) + AE/EC 3 weekly \*4 followed by Surgery+ RT
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Triple-negative breast cancer is a subtype of breast cancer that is clinically negative for expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and HER2 protein. It is characterized by its unique molecular profile, aggressive behavior, distinct patterns of metastasis, and lack of targeted therapies. Although not synonymous, the majority of triple-negative breast cancers carry the "basal-like" molecular profile on gene expression arrays.

Although sensitive to chemotherapy, early relapse is common and these cancers show a predilection for visceral metastasis, including brain metastasis. Targeted agents, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, are currently in clinical trials and hold promise in the treatment of this aggressive disease.

Multiple independent data sets have revealed that the triple negative type of breast cancer carries a poor prognosis. It is unclear whether the poor prognosis of triple negative breast cancer is due to poor therapy options or inherent aggressiveness. Given their triple negative receptor status, these tumors are not amenable to conventional targeted therapies for breast cancer, such as endocrine therapy or trastuzumab, leaving only chemotherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Patients on metformin showed a 30-40% protection against all forms of cancer. Recent pilot studies carried out using population registries raise the possibility that metformin may reduce cancer risk and/or improve cancer prognosis. One showed an unexpectedly lower risk of a cancer diagnosis among diabetics using metformin compared with a control group of diabetics using other treatments ; another showed lower cancer-specific mortality among subjects with diabetes using metformin compared with diabetics on other treatments. Metformin is a biguanide known to be an insulin sensitizing agent which promotes reduced circulating insulin and glucose levels in hyper-glycaemic and hyper-insulinaemic patients. Metformin activates the AMP dependent kinase, attenuates insulin and IGF-1 stimulated proliferation in breast cancer cells and a general decrease in protein synthesis in vitro. Western blot analysis indicated that metformin stimulates AMPK phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. AMPK activation is associated with decreased phosphorylation of mTOR and S6 kinase. While metformin reduces breast carcinoma cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, the activation of AMPK leads to significant VEGF production, angiogenesis and tumor progression. This must be taken into consideration when it is applied in as a therapeutic regimen.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18-70 years
2. All patients with baseline clinical staging T4, N0-3, M0 or T1-4, N2-3, M0 and T3, N1, M0 with triple negative hormone status.
3. Patients with adequate baseline marrow function defined as ANC \> 1500/mm3 and Platelet count \> 1, 00,000/mm3.
4. Patients with acceptable liver function tests (normal bilirubin and AST/ALT \< 2 times the upper limit of normal) and normal renal function tests at baseline
5. Patients willing to provide informed consent
6. Patients fit for chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior excision biopsy
2. Metastatic breast cancer
3. Women with inflammatory breast cancer
4. Poor cardiac function at baseline with LVEF \<40%
5. Patients with a prior history of a malignancy
6. Pregnant or lactating women.

Primary outcomes:
measure: DFS
timeFrame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
measure: OS
timeFrame: From date of randomization to the date of death or up to date of last follow-up for alive patients whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
measure: Response rate
timeFrame: 9-12 months from Randomization
Locations:
city: Mumbai
country: India
facility: Tata memorial Centre
state: Maharashtra
Study officials:
References: