Clinical trial NCT02798133: Open Lung Approach Versus Standard Protective Strategies
Official title: Open Lung Approach Versus Standard Protective Strategies: Effects on Driving Pressure and Ventilatory Efficiency During Anesthesia
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Lung Collapse
Lead sponsor: Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-06-14
Enrollment: 36
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adding a recruitment maneuver (RM) to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, with or without an individualized post-RM positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting in lung-healthy patients during anesthesia.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* ASA physical status I-III undergoing elective major abdominal surgery including pancreatic-duodenectomy, gastrectomy and liver resection

Exclusion Criteria:

* i) laparoscopic surgery, ii) patients with previous respiratory disease.

Primary outcomes:
measure: driving pressure
timeFrame: intraoperative
Secondary outcomes:
measure: ventilatory efficiency
timeFrame: intraoperative
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
References:
citation: Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Gunay E, Jaber S, Kokulu S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Ranieri VM, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Amato MB, Costa EL, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
citation: Kacmarek RM, Villar J, Sulemanji D, Montiel R, Ferrando C, Blanco J, Koh Y, Soler JA, Martinez D, Hernandez M, Tucci M, Borges JB, Lubillo S, Santos A, Araujo JB, Amato MB, Suarez-Sipmann F; Open Lung Approach Network. Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001383.
citation: Ferrando C, Mugarra A, Gutierrez A, Carbonell JA, Garcia M, Soro M, Tusman G, Belda FJ. Setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure level with a positive end-expiratory pressure decrement trial after a recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):657-65. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000105.
citation: Ferrando C, Suarez-Sipmann F, Tusman G, Leon I, Romero E, Gracia E, Mugarra A, Arocas B, Pozo N, Soro M, Belda FJ. Open lung approach versus standard protective strategies: Effects on driving pressure and ventilatory efficiency during anesthesia - A pilot, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177399. eCollection 2017.