Clinical trial NCT01760824: Quadruple Versus Sequential Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication
Official title: Ten Days Quadruple Versus Sequential Therapy as Empirical First and Second Line Treatment for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: a Randomized Crossover Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Helicobacter Pylori Infection
Keywords: Sequential
Quadruple
First
Line
Helicobacter
pylori
infection
Lead sponsor: The University of Hong Kong
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2013-01-04
Enrollment: 391
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Helicobacter pylori (HP), a bacterium present in many people's stomachs, is one of the major causes of ulcers and cancers. Up to 20% of patients infected with H. pylori may develop peptic ulcers. However, failure rate is rising due to multiple resistant H. pylori infection. The eradication rate of first line clarithromycin based therapy has fallen to below 80%. Both quadruple and sequential treatment regime has been proposed as the first-line empirical regime. Nevertheless, comparison in terms of efficacy and side effects between the two regime remained unknown. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of H. pylori eradication with a 10-day quadruple therapy versus sequential therapy as empirical first and second line treatment.

Detailed description: Helicobacter pylori (HP), a bacterium present in many people's stomachs, is one of the major causes of ulcers and cancers. Up to 20% of patients infected with HP may develop peptic ulcers. However, failure rate is rising due to multiple resistant HP infection. The eradication rate of first line clarithromycin based therapy has fell to below 80% and increasing number of patients also failed the second line quadruple therapy. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of H. pylori eradication with a 10-day quadruple therapy versus sequential therapy as empirical first and second line treatment.

Methods: Eligible H. pylori positive patients were randomized to receive either QUAD (esomeprazole 20mg twice daily, bismuth subcitrate 120mg four times daily, tetracycline 500mg four times daily and metronidazole 400mg four times daily) for 10 days or SEQ (esomeprazole 20mg twice daily for 10 days, amoxicillin 1g twice daily for first 5 days, clarithromycin 500mg twice daily and metronidazole 400mg four time daily for the subsequent 5 days). All patients returned 8 weeks after completing the treatment for a Urea Breath Test (UBT) to confirm eradication. Patients who failed their respective therapy were crossover to receive the alternative regimen.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* patients with age 18 or above, diagnosed to have gastric HP infection

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with age less than 18, with past allergy to the study medications, concurrent critical illnesses, a history of previous upper gastrointestinal surgery, intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, probiotics, bismuth preparation, proton pump inhibitors, anticoagulants or steroids in the previous one month, pregnant or breast-feeding women, drug abusers or alcoholic, history of previous H. Pylori treatment

Primary outcomes:
measure: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate
timeFrame: 8 weeks after treatment
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Development of side effects
timeFrame: 10 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Hong Kong SAR
country: Hong Kong
facility: The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: The University of Hong Kong
name: Ivan FN Hung, MD FRCP
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Liu KS, Hung IF, Seto WK, Tong T, Hsu AS, Lam FY, But DY, Wong SY, Leung WK. Ten day sequential versus 10 day modified bismuth quadruple therapy as empirical firstline and secondline treatment for Helicobacter pylori in Chinese patients: an open label, randomised, crossover trial. Gut. 2014 Sep;63(9):1410-5. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306120. Epub 2013 Dec 2.