Clinical trial NCT01211496: The Effect of Velocity Training in Functionally Limited Elderly
Official title: High Velocity Resistance Training in Older Men and Women
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Aging
Keywords: functional testing
resistance training
velocity training
elderly
geriatric
knee
leg
leg strength
Lead sponsor: University of Missouri-Columbia
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute on Aging (NIA)
First posted: 2010-09-29
Enrollment: 52
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 65
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: We are exploring a unique weight-training program for men and women 65 years or older that emphasizes high speed training. We believe that the speed at which muscles move may be more important to the performance of functional tasks than how strong the muscles are. We are comparing velocity training with traditional strength training to determine which method has the greatest effects on muscle strength, speed of movement, functional performance and physical disability. We believe that higher speed training will improve these measures to a greater extent than simply training for increased muscle strength.

Aging also results in loss of bone mass, which increases the risk for falls and fractures. Strength training also has been shown to maintain bone mass in the elderly, but no studies have examined high velocity resistance training and maintenance of bone mass. We believe it is important to examine this aspect of velocity training before recommendations can be made.

Detailed description: The study compared 12 weeks of explosive high-speed power training with traditional slow-speed strength training. Outcome measures included muscle performance: leg press (LP) and knee extension (KE) one-repetition maximum (1RM) and LP peak power (PP), velocity at peak power (PPV) and force at peak power (PPF) from 40%-90% of the 1RM. Measures of function consisted of habitual and maximal gait velocity, the short physical performance battery (SPPB), forward tandem walk, and lower limb movement time (braking speed) on an automobile driving simulator.

Participants reported to the laboratory for 2 weeks of baseline measurements. On visit 1, subjects were explained the study and completed an informed consent document. On visit 2 and 3, muscle performance and functional measures were obtained. The following week, all muscle performance and functional measures were repeated to establish reliability. At the end of baseline testing, participants were randomized to treatment. Following the 12-week RT intervention, post-training muscle performance and functional measures were obtained.

Resistance Training Protocol. Volunteers randomized into high-speed power training (HSPT) and slow-speed strength training (SSST) exercised 3 times per week for 12 weeks using computer-interfaced Keiser a420 pneumatic leg press and knee extension RT equipment (Fresno, CA). For HSPT, each training session consisted of 3 sets of 12-14 repetitions at 40%1RM. Participants performed an explosive movement at high speed during the concentric phase of each repetition, paused for one-second, and performed the eccentric portion of the contraction over 2 seconds. Volunteers randomized into SSST also exercised 3 times per week for 12 weeks with each training session consisting of 3 sets of 8-10 repetitions at 80%1RM. The participants performed each movement at a slow velocity (2 s for concentric phase of the repetition), paused for one second, and performed the eccentric portion of the contraction over 2 seconds. CON met three times a week for warm-up and stretching exercises, but performed no RT. HSPT and SSST participated in the same warm-up and stretching exercises as CON.

Measures Maximal strength and power. Leg press and seated knee extension 1RM were obtained using Keiser pneumatic RT equipment fitted with a420 electronics. The seat of both the recumbent LP and KE apparatus was positioned to place the hip and knee joints between 90 and 100 degrees of flexion. The 1RM was obtained by progressively increasing resistance until the subject was no longer able to push out one repetition successfully. The Borg Scale was used to assist in evaluating when 1RM (combined with perceived maximal effort) was reached. Peak muscle power was obtained at 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% and 90% of the 1RM approximately 30 minutes after 1RM testing (8,9). Participants were instructed to exert "as fast as possible" at each relative percentage of the 1RM. Three attempts were made at each resistance and the greatest PP output obtained at each resistance was used in the analysis. The corresponding PPV and PPF were obtained for each external resistance from 40%-90% 1RM. The 1RM was measured bi-weekly in HSPT and SSST only and relative training intensity was adjusted accordingly to ensure adequate overload during training. Post-training muscle performance measures were obtained using loads relative to the initial baseline 1RM as well as the post-training 1RM.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 65 years of age
* relatively inactive
* male or female
* good overall health
* living independently (not in a nursing home or care facility)

Exclusion Criteria:

* physically active/athletic
* heart attack or unstable angina within 6 months of consent
* hip fracture, knee or hip replacement within 6 months of consent
* diagnosed neurological disease
* pulmonary disease requiring use of oxygen
* osteoarthritis of the knee
* severe visual or hearing impairment

Primary outcomes:
measure: Strength and Power
timeFrame: 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Mobility and Function
timeFrame: 6 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Missouri-Columbia School of Health Professions Physical Therapy Dept
name: Stephen P Sayers, Ph.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: