Clinical trial NCT04786535: Efficacy of Uremic Toxins Clearance With Expanded Hemodialysis
Official title: Crossover Study of Three Groups Comparing the Efficacy of Uremic Toxins Clearance of Expanded Hemodialysis With Two Hemodialysis Membranes for Conventional Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: End Stage Renal Disease
Keywords: Uremic Toxins
Hemodiafiltration
Expanded Hemodialysis
High-Flux Conventional Hemodialysis
Lead sponsor: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Baxter México
First posted: 2021-03-08
Enrollment: 23
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of this study is to quantify the B2-microglobulin reduction rate based on the type of extracorporeal therapy (ET) used: HDx (expanded hemodialysis), HDc (high-flux conventional hemodialysis), or HDF (hemodiafiltration).

And to compare the magnitude of the B2-microglobulin reduction rate based on the type of extracorporeal therapy (ET) used: HDx, HDc, or HDF

Detailed description: A controlled, randomized, crossover clinical trial is planned to compare the magnitude of the B2-microglobulin reduction rate in three different extracorporeal therapies (ETs): HDc, HDx, and HDF.

The selection of study participants will be consecutive and for convenience

This study will be divided into six periods: three treatment periods (one for each therapy to be compared) and three of "washout" periods (interspersed between the treatment periods). The treatment periods will last four weeks (12 ET sessions, three per week) and will be preceded by a one-week washout period (three ET sessions)

After inclusion in the protocol, participants will be randomly assigned (with the help of a table of random numbers) to one of three ETs to be evaluated (HDc, HDx, or HDF). Afterwards, the first washout period will begin with high-flow conventional hemodialysis (HDc). At the end of the first washout period, the ET randomly assigned to one of three ETs to be evaluated (HDc, HDx, or HDF), following the sequence: Washout 1 -\> Period 1 (HDC, HDx, or HDF) -\> Washout 2 -\> Period 2, etc.

For each period of ET, there will be two sampling times: baseline and final

Blood samples will be obtained through the arterial port of the extracorporeal circuit, at the beginning and at the end of the ET session. The "slow flow" method will be used (UF: 0 mL/min, Qd: 0 mL/min, and Qb: 100 mL/min, for 30 seconds, before extracting the sample from the arterial port) (24). Blood samples will be collected in dry tubes (without anticoagulant) and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3,000 RPM. The supernatant will be divided into three aliquots and stored at -70°C for further processing.

To calculate sample size, the formula for a noninferiority study was used (Pharmaceutical statistics. 2016;15(1):80-9), which is detailed below:

n= ((r+1) (Z_(1-β)+Z_(1-α) )\^2 σ\^2)/(r((μ_A-μ_B )-d_NI )\^2 )

The terms above, are substituted with values obtained from the publication of Kirsch et al. (Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172) as follows:

Objective: Non-inferiority (Ho µA - µB ≤ -dNI vs. µA - µB \> -dNI) Outcome: B2-microglobulin reduction rate. r: allocation ratio by group:1 beta: type II error (90% power):1.2816 alpha: type I error (level of significance 5%):1.960 (variance in the population):1.33 µA - µB (magnitude of the observed effect):80.6 - 78.5 = 2.1 dNI (non-inferiority limit): 3.5

n= ((1+1) (1.2816+1.960)\^2 〖(1.33)〗\^2)/(1((2.1)-3.5)\^2 )= 19, the investigators estimate a 20 % loss in the follow-up , then investigators consider a sample size of n = 23 patients

The nominal variables will be presented in frequencies and proportions. Continuous numerical variables will be analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov "Z" test to determine their distribution. The results will be shown as the means ± standard deviation in case of normal distribution and as a median with minimum and maximum limits for variables with non-normal distribution.

The total serum concentration of the biochemical variables in general as well as the uremic toxins will be analyzed. Additionally, the reduction rate and purification of the uremic toxins will be analyzed.

The analyses of the inter- and intra-group differences will be performed using the one-way multiple comparisons (ANOVA) method. Post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni method will be used in cases where the groups present a normal distribution; otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis method will be used. A result with a p \< 0.05 will be considered significant

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Over 18 years
* Anuric patients (residual urinary volume ≤ 100 mL/24 h)
* Intermittent chronic hemodialysis (three sessions per week, of 3.5 to 4 hours each)
* Without modification of their prescription in the last three months
* Functional arteriovenous fistula, indwelling vascular access (Qb ≥ 300 mL/min), or both
* Letter of acceptance to enter the protocol and a signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Under 18 years
* Active intake or intake in the last six months of immunosuppressants or systemic steroids
* Active autoimmune disease
* Evidence of active systemic infectious event at the time of inclusion or two weeks prior
* Diagnosis of neoplasia or active oncological disease
* Hypoalbuminemia (\< 3.2 g/dL)
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Refusal to participate in the study

Primary outcomes:
measure: B2-microglobulin reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Urea reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
measure: Phosphorus reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
measure: Interleukin 6 reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
measure: P-cresol reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
measure: Tumor necrosis factor-a reduction rate
timeFrame: At final of each period of ET (4 weeks)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Mexico City
country: Mexico
facility: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Study officials:
affiliation: Head Departament of Nephrology and Mineral Metabolism,
name: Ricardo Correa-Rotter, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Belmouaz M, Diolez J, Bauwens M, Duthe F, Ecotiere L, Desport E, Bridoux F. Comparison of hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and on-line hemodiafiltration on the removal of small and middle-sized molecules . Clin Nephrol. 2018 Jan;89 (2018)(1):50-56. doi: 10.5414/CN109133 .
citation: Ronco C. The Rise of Expanded Hemodialysis. Blood Purif. 2017;44(2):I-VIII. doi: 10.1159/000476012. Epub 2017 May 10.
citation: Ronco C, Marchionna N, Brendolan A, Neri M, Lorenzin A, Martinez Rueda AJ. Expanded haemodialysis: from operational mechanism to clinical results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Oct 1;33(suppl_3):iii41-iii47. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy202.
citation: Zickler D, Schindler R, Willy K, Martus P, Pawlak M, Storr M, Hulko M, Boehler T, Glomb MA, Liehr K, Henning C, Templin M, Trojanowicz B, Ulrich C, Werner K, Fiedler R, Girndt M. Medium Cut-Off (MCO) Membranes Reduce Inflammation in Chronic Dialysis Patients-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169024. eCollection 2017.
citation: Kirsch AH, Lyko R, Nilsson LG, Beck W, Amdahl M, Lechner P, Schneider A, Wanner C, Rosenkranz AR, Krieter DH. Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.