Clinical trial NCT05587192: Radical Prostatectomy Without Prostate Biopsy Following PSMA PET/CT Based on Diagnostic Model
Official title: Radical Prostatectomy Without Prostate Biopsy Following 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Based on a Diagnostic Model: a Single-center, Single-arm, Open-label Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Prostate Cancer
Keywords: prostate cancer
PSMA-1007
PET-CT
Biopsy
prostate-specific antigen
mpMRI
Diagnosis
Lead sponsor: Anhui Provincial Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2022-10-19
Enrollment: 57
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: The goal of this prospective, single-center, single-arm trial is to evaluate the positive predictive values between 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model in patients with suspicious of prostate cancer. The main question and our aim to answer is:

• Can these patients with clinically significant prostate cancer in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model undergo radical prostatectomy directly without prostate biopsy.

Participants will be asked to accomplish the test of serum PSA, mpMRI, then, the eligible patients (The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was greater than or equal to 60 percent) need perform 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Finally, patients will receive radical prostatectomy directly if prostate cancer is considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

Detailed description: Study Design and Setting SNOTOB study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm and open-label clinical study and conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC in China. Patients who have no surgical contraindications and meet the enrollment criteria will be recruited to the study. Subsequently, we will recommend these patients to accept radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy directly. Before the operation, patients and their family member will be fully informed of the surgical risks, the necessity to perform a prostate biopsy for pathologic confirmation, the possibility of benign prostatic disease and the other alternative therapeutic methods including active surveillance, radiotherapy, and focal therapies and so on. Finally, the diagnostic performance of our noninvasive diagnostic strategy will be verified with the pathological results.

Screening and Enrollment The noninvasive diagnostic strategy in this study consists of a prostate cancer diagnostic model and 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) examination in series. After the patients complete the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), we can obtain the information of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score. Then, patients' risk probability of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) will be calculated by the online diagnostic nomogram (website: https://ustcprostatecancerprediction.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/). When the prediction probability of csPCa is equal or greater than 0.60, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT will be applied for further diagnosis. If patients are still considered as csPCa after 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examinations, we define this condition as positive result of our noninvasive diagnostic strategy. These patients meet our criteria of this study. Of note, patients with prediction probability less than 0.60 will no longer undergo 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examinations, and patients with risk probability equal or greater than 0.60 but negative 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examinations will not meet the enrollment criteria too.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (abnormal DRE or PSA);
2. Complete the test of serum PSA and examination of mpMRI;
3. 4 ng/ml ≤serum total PSA\<100ng/ml;
4. The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was greater than or equal to 60 percent;
5. Prostate cancer is considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT;
6. Meet the surgical indications for radical prostatectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Incomplete information of serum PSA tests or mpMRI;
2. serum total PSA\<4ng/ml or ≥ 100 ng/ml;
3. The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was less than 60 percent;
4. Prostate cancer is not considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT;
5. Patients who have negative results in the previous prostate biopsy;
6. Patients refuse radical prostatectomy or still choose prostate biopsy.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer
timeFrame: Immediately after prostatectomy
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Detection rate of prostate cancer
timeFrame: Immediately after prostatectomy
measure: Detection of high-grade prostate cancer
timeFrame: Immediately after prostatectomy
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Hefei
country: China
facility: The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
state: Anhui
Study officials:
affiliation: The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC
name: Tao Tao, MD Ph.D
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, Yang F, Yan X, Zhang S, Li N, Chen W. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.
citation: Rebello RJ, Oing C, Knudsen KE, Loeb S, Johnson DC, Reiter RE, Gillessen S, Van der Kwast T, Bristow RG. Prostate cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0.
citation: Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, Hwang EC, Zhou Q, Cleves A, Agoritsas T, Dahm P. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519.
citation: Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
citation: Naji L, Randhawa H, Sohani Z, Dennis B, Lautenbach D, Kavanagh O, Bawor M, Banfield L, Profetto J. Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):149-154. doi: 10.1370/afm.2205.
citation: Duffy MJ. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Feb 25;58(3):326-339. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0693.
citation: Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
citation: Sathianathen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Davies L, Kasivisvanathan V, Punwani S, Moore CM, Kastner C, Barrett T, Van Den Bergh RC, Eddy BA, Gleeson F, Macpherson R, Bryant RJ, Catto JWF, Murphy DG, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20.
citation: Berry B, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, Nossiter J, Cowling TE, Aggarwal A, Cathcart P, Payne H, van der Meulen J, Clarke N. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/bju.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
citation: Hubner N, Shariat S, Remzi M. Prostate biopsy: guidelines and evidence. Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jul;28(4):354-359. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000510.
citation: Tao T, Wang C, Liu W, Yuan L, Ge Q, Zhang L, He B, Wang L, Wang L, Xiang C, Wang H, Chen S, Xiao J. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data. Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:811866. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811866. eCollection 2021.
citation: Neels OC, Kopka K, Liolios C, Afshar-Oromieh A. Radiolabeled PSMA Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;13(24):6255. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246255.
citation: Scheltema MJ, Chang JI, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, Nguyen QA, Ho B, Delprado W, Lee J, Thompson JE, Cusick T, Spriensma AS, Siriwardana AR, Yuen C, Kooner R, Hruby G, O'Neill G, Emmett L. Diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET) and multiparametric (mp)MRI to detect intermediate-grade intra-prostatic prostate cancer using whole-mount pathology: impact of the addition of 68 Ga-PSMA PET to mpMRI. BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:42-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14794. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
citation: Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
citation: Meissner VH, Rauscher I, Schwamborn K, Neumann J, Miller G, Weber W, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Heck MM. Radical Prostatectomy Without Prior Biopsy Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Dec 6.