Clinical trial NCT01150838: Propofol for Pediatric Tracheal Intubation With Deep Anesthesia During Sevoflurane Induction
Official title: Propofol for Pediatric Tracheal Intubation With Deep Anesthesia During Sevoflurane Induction: Dosing According to Elapsed Time for Two Age Groups,IRB-HSR# 13666
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Anesthesia Intubation Complication
Keywords: intubation of children without neuromuscular blockade
Lead sponsor: University of Virginia
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2010-06-28
Enrollment: 106
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 1
Maximum age (years): 11
Standard ages: CHILD
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: This is a single study with 6 parallel groups as noted in the description. With Dixon's Up and Down Method for determining a 50th percentile of a dichotomous outcome, the number of patients required is not known prior to starting a study. Data from Paul and Fisher demonstrated that 6 "crossovers" (change in the dichotomous outcome from one patient to another, indicating change from increasing the dose of the study drug to decreasing it, or visa-versa). When choosing a meaningful starting point near the 50th percentile, the number required is typically 15-20 patients. With 6 study groups, the estimated number of patients required would be 90-120. Please Note: This is not a study where one can perform a power analysis and determine a required N.
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of propofol required to achieve 50% of patients obtaining a perfect ("excellent") intubation score of 5 on the Steyn modification of the Helbo-Hansen Intubation Score, when placing a tracheal tube in children 1-6 years and 6-12 years (division of age groups at 6th birthday) of age, under a specific induction and ventilation sequence as specified in this study design.

Detailed description: The practice of tracheal intubation of children without neuromuscular blockade (TIWNB) is widespread in pediatric anesthesia practices. There are several different methods reported for TIWNB, most of which involve administration of an inhaled anesthetic in combination with an intravenous adjunctive medication. The technique of administering propofol IV, immediately after IV placement, after a sevoflurane induction is perhaps the most popular method for pediatric TIWNB in the United States and worldwide (personal communication, and personal practice of this technique). At the time this study was proposed, nobody had studied this technique, and therefore nobody had quantified the amount of propofol needed in this context, or considered that the amount may differ according to the time sevoflurane has been administered at the moment propofol is given. This study divides patients into two age categories, with the first age group starting at the 1 year birthday and going up to the 6th year birthday, and the second age group going from the 6th year birthday up to the 12th birthday. The study also divides participants according to time that they have received sevoflurane from the start of anesthetic induction until intravenous access is achieved and propofol immediately administered. That amount of time varies in clinical practice due to variable difficulty obtaining pediatric intravenous access, and the amount of propofol may vary according to the amount of sevoflurane administered (time administered) because depth of anesthesia will increase with increasing duration of sevoflurane administration. The purpose of this study is to determine for both age groups the amount of propofol required to achieve 50% of patients obtaining a perfect intubation score of 5 on the Steyn modification of the Helbo-Hansen Intubation Score (HH Score), when placing a tracheal tube after various time periods of administration of sevoflurane. The 3 different time windows for sevoflurane administration prior to the propofol bolus will be 2-4 minutes, 4-6 minutes, and 6-8 minutes, starting the time clock at the start of anesthetic induction and ending at the moment the propofol is given. The study therefore has 6 separate groups (2 age groups x 3 time period groups) each of which utilizes a Dixon's Up and Down Method, moving up or down on the amount of propofol administered according to the result of the previous patient in each group (HH Score of 5 labeled "excellent intubation" indicates allocation of predetermined (0.3 mg/kg) incrementally smaller amount of propofol and \>5 labeled as "not-excellent intubation" an increase of 0.3 mg/kg of propofol. Linear regression will be used for each of the 6 groups to determine the amount of propofol required to achieve 50% perfect intubation, with 95% confidence intervals also calculated.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Informed consent / assent
* Ages 1-11 years (12 - 132 months)
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1 or 2, which implies that the patient has no comorbidity that limits daily function.
* Scheduled for non-emergent surgery/ procedure under general anesthesia in which the anesthesia team intends to place an endotracheal tube
* Expected routine intubation according to physical exam and history
* Weight under 50 kg

Exclusion Criteria:

* Requires neuromuscular blocking agents
* Emergent surgery / procedure
* Expected difficult intubation
* ASA physical status 3 or 4
* Weight over 50 kg
* Age under 12 months or over 132 months
* Allergy to study drugs to be used

Primary outcomes:
measure: Estimated Propofol Doses Producing 50% Excellent Intubation Conditions
timeFrame: Amount of time it takes to intubate each patient; approximate time is 15-45 seconds
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Charlottesville
country: United States
facility: University of Virginia Health System
state: Virginia
Study officials:
affiliation: UVA Department of Anesthesiology
name: George D Politis, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Politis GD, Tobin JR, Morell RC, James RL, Cantwell MF. Tracheal intubation of healthy pediatric patients without muscle relaxant: a survey of technique utilization and perceptions of safety. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):737-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00009.
citation: Politis GD, Frankland MJ, James RL, ReVille JF, Rieker MP, Petree BC. Factors associated with successful tracheal intubation of children with sevoflurane and no muscle relaxant. Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):615-20, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00022.
citation: Simon L, Boucebci KJ, Orliaguet G, Aubineau JV, Devys JM, Dubousset AM. A survey of practice of tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Jan;12(1):36-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00727.x.
citation: Blair JM, Hill DA, Bali IM, Fee JP. Tracheal intubating conditions after induction with sevoflurane 8% in children. A comparison with two intravenous techniques. Anaesthesia. 2000 Aug;55(8):774-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01470.x.
citation: Dixon WJ. Quantal response to variable experimentation: the up-and-down method. In: McArthur JW, Colton T, eds. Statistics in Endocrionolgy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1967: 251-264.
citation: Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, Koscielniak-Nielsen Z, Skovgaard LT, Ostergaard D. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Jan;40(1):59-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04389.x.
citation: Steyn MP, Quinn AM, Gillespie JA, Miller DC, Best CJ, Morton NS. Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Apr;72(4):403-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.4.403.
citation: Paul M, Fisher DM. Are estimates of MAC reliable? Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1362-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00014.
citation: Hansen D, Schaffartzik W, Dopjans D, Heitz E, Striebel HW. Halothane-propofol anaesthesia for tracheal intubation in young children. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;78(4):366-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.4.366.
citation: Min SK, Kwak YL, Park SY, Kim JS, Kim JY. The optimal dose of remifentanil for intubation during sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular blockade in children. Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):446-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05037.x.
citation: Nishina K, Mikawa K, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. Oral clonidine premedication reduces minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for tracheal intubation in children. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1324-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00010.
citation: Inomata S, Nishikawa T. Determination of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation in children with the rapid method. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):806-11. doi: 10.1007/BF03013033.
citation: Inomata S, Yamashita S, Toyooka H, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi M, Sato S. Anaesthetic induction time for tracheal intubation using sevoflurane or halothane in children. Anaesthesia. 1998 May;53(5):440-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00338.x.
citation: Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, Lux P, Barth V, Plinkert PK, Fuchs-Buder T. Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1049-56. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00005.
citation: Vakkuri A, Yli-Hankala A, Sarkela M, Lindgren L, Mennander S, Korttila K, Saarnivaara L, Jantti V. Sevoflurane mask induction of anaesthesia is associated with epileptiform EEG in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Aug;45(7):805-11. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045007805.x.