Clinical trial NCT04927598: Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Gullian Barrie Syndrome Outcome
Official title: Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Gullian Barrie Syndrome Outcome
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Keywords: predictors and prognostic factors of outcome
Lead sponsor: Assiut University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-06-16
Enrollment: 62
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 10
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Guillian Barre syndrome ( GBS ) is a rare disease , its incidence nearly , 0.8 - 1.8 case / 100000 population ( 16,17) .

Total coverage of patients with ( GBS ) fitting inclusion criteria and seeking care at Neuro-psychiatric clinics or admitted at Neuro-psychiatry hospital through one year duration about 3 -4 cases per month (36 -38 case per year ) .

Brief summary: This study aims to identify clinical and biological determinants and factors that predict outcome including primary outcome (percentage of changes in clinical scales pre- and after 3 months ) and secondary outcome depending on neurophysiologiacal studies and prognostic factors in individual patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome i individuals managed by plasmapheresis and IVIG immunoglobulin .

This information will be used to understand the diversity in clinical presentation and response to treatment of GBS.

Detailed description: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute onset, monophasic, immune-mediated peripheral nerve and root disorder (termed polyradiculoneuropathy), GBS has become the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis worldwide and is a neurological emergency .Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) encompasses group of acute immune-mediated disordes restricted to peripheral nerves and roots. Good circumstantial evidence exists for a pathogenic role for molecular mimicry in GBS pathogenesis,especially with its axonal forms, providing insights that could guide future immunotherapy :Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE) .

Clinical presentation is a sudden onset of rapidly progressive and symmetrical weakness of the limbs, with or without peripheral sensory disturbance, reduction in or loss of tendon reflexes , and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing elevated protein concentrations with a normal white cell count, termed albuminocytologic dissociation, to distinguish it from infections that typically demonstrate elevated protein and white cell counts. The symptoms typically reach maximal severity within four weeks from symptom onset. Most patients generally require hospitalization for treatment, with close cardiopulmonary monitoring performed. Many patients also develop symptoms or signs of autonomic nervous system dysfunction, termed dysautonomia. These commonly consist of sinus tachycardia, arrhythmias,, orthostatic hypotension, increased sweating and bladder and gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Antecedent infections, typically within 4 weeks of neurological symptom onset, commonly occur in GBS patients, resulting in the commonly cited molecular mimicry hypothesis, in which the immune system becomes activated in response to infectious antigen with structural similarity to peripheral nerve myelin or axonal components, with resultant tissue-specific peripheral nerve and nerve root injury in susceptible individuals.

Epidemiological data implies that about two-thirds of GBS adult patients had a prior respiratory or gastrointestinal infection.Pathophysiology and immunopathology of the preceding infections are pathogenically associated with GBS, and may play an essential role in triggering the initial peripheral nerve/ nerve root-specific systemic immune system activation that causes cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses with resultant demyelination, axonal injury or both involving peripheral nerves and roots.

Optimal treatment of individual patients may depend on the pathogenesis and clinical severity. Patients with severe forms of GBS may possibly need more intensive treatment to recover. Patients with a milder course that fully recover after standard therapy could suffer from possibly more side effects of more aggressive forms of treatment. This could only be possible if there are prognostic models that accurately predict the clinical course in individual patients. Ideally such models should be based on clinical and biological predictors that are strongly associated with disease course and known as early as possible in the acute phase of illness, when treatment with immunomodulatory therapy is most effective. Prognostic models could help to guide selective trials in specific GBS subtypes. Because of this it will be possible to treat GBS with more effective and more individual therapy

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Any Age, recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks . Gender: Male or Female Inclusion Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

* patients with metabolic disorders, others

Primary outcomes:
measure: clinical scales :The GBS Disability Scale
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
measure: Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score )
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
measure: ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS :
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
measure: Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (EGOS)
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
measure: overall neuropathy limitations scale ONLS .
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: comparison between pre and post neurophysiological studies
timeFrame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Assuit
country: Egypt
facility: Assiut university
state: Assiut
Study officials:
References:
citation: van Doorn PA, Ruts L, Jacobs BC. Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):939-50. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70215-1.
citation: Raphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD001798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub2.
citation: Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, Walgaard C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):33-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt285. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
citation: van Doorn PA. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 2):e193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2013.02.328. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
citation: van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, van Doorn PA, Hermans M, Bakkers M, Kuitwaard K, Faber CG, Merkies IS. Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) for immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):337-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318208824b.
citation: Mori M, Kuwabara S, Fukutake T, Hattori T. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Miller Fisher syndrome. Neurology. 2007 Apr 3;68(14):1144-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258673.31824.61.
citation: Kalita J, Misra UK, Goyal G, Das M. Guillain-Barre syndrome: subtypes and predictors of outcome from India. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2014 Mar;19(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/jns5.12050.
citation: Dornonville de la Cour C, Jakobsen J. Residual neuropathy in long-term population-based follow-up of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):246-53. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149521.65474.83.
citation: van Koningsveld R, Steyerberg EW, Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Jul;6(7):589-94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70130-8.
citation: Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):968-75. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182104407.