Clinical trial NCT06473545: Retrospective Evaluation of a Novel Biomimetic Synthetic Bone Substitute (Creos® Syntogain)
Official title: Retrospective Data Collection Evaluating the Performance of a Novel Biomimetic Synthetic Bone Substitute (Creos® Syntogain) up to 72 Months Follow-up
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Tooth Loss
Partial-edentulism
Tooth Fracture
Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Keywords: Bone graft
Implant Placement
Immediate implant placement
Socket preservation
Guided bone regeneration
Synthetic bone graft
Delayed implant placement
Sinus elevation
Lead sponsor: International dentistry Research Group
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Nobel Biocare
First posted: 2024-06-25
Enrollment: 173
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Community population attending to one of the centers adhered to the study.

Brief summary: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a commonly performed technique, using autogenous grafts, allografts, xenografts, or synthetic bone grafts (SBG). Advantages of an "off the shelf" substitute, available anytime with limitless fabrication capacity that avoids human, or animal associated morbidity provides SBG with a very positive future perspective. This data collection is to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical performance of a CE marked biomimetic SBG substitute in patients with implant placement related bone regeneration treatments up to 72 months of follow-up. The study hypothesis states that a biomimetic SBG is a verified graft choice to be used clinically in patients with implant placement related bone regeneration treatments such as socket preservation with a delayed implant placement, GBR simultaneous with immediate implant placement, and sinus lift elevation with lateral approach.

Detailed description: 1. Title

   Retrospective data collection evaluating the performance of a novel biomimetic synthetic bone substitute (Creos® Syntogain) up to 72 months follow-up.
2. Introduction

   Edentulism, partial or full, can be predictably treated with esthetic and functional results with implant supported prosthesis when adequate alveolar bone is present. Jawbone defects or post-extraction edentulism atrophy of the alveolar bone need appropriate surgical techniques to preserve or augment the alveolar process. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a commonly performed technique, using autogenous grafts, allografts, xenografts, or synthetic bone grafts (SBG). Advantages of an "off the shelf" substitute, available anytime with limitless fabrication capacity that avoids human, or animal associated morbidity provides SBG with a very positive future perspective. However, successful clinical performance and results with the use SBG must be supported by scientific clinical evidence. This data collection is to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical performance of a CE marked biomimetic SBG substitute in patients with implant placement related bone regeneration treatments up to 72 months of follow-up.
3. Study hypothesis, aims and objectives

The study hypothesis states that a biomimetic SBG is a verified graft choice to be used clinically in patients with implant placement related bone regeneration treatments such as socket preservation (SP) with a delayed implant placement (DIP), GBR simultaneous with immediate implant placement (IIP), and sinus lift elevation with lateral approach (SLE).

In order to test this hypothesis, the primary objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical performance of a CE marked biomimetic SBG substitute (Creos® Syntogain, Nobel Biocare, Switzelrand) in patients with implant placement related bone regeneration treatments.

4. Materials and methods

1. Patient selection

   Subjects will be consecutively included provided they meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Sex and age, pretreatment records, radiographic images, clinical photographs, treatment, and post-treatment follow-up visit records will be reviewed for patients fulfilling the selection criteria:
2. Treatment sequence

   Information regarding each patient will be extracted retrospectively from the clinic database until the last visit available from every patient included according to a case record form (CRF) following the sequence of treatment, where follow-up appointments are calculated from the time of final prosthetic delivery:
   1. Pre-treatment examination (T0)
   2. GBR surgery (T1)
   3. Pre-implant control (T2) (± 1 month end of healing period)
   4. Implant insertion (T3) (± 1 month end of healing period)
   5. Final prosthesis insertion (T4)
   6. 1-year follow-up appointment (T5) (± 1 month)
   7. 2-year follow-up appointment (T6) (± 2 months)
   8. 3-year follow-up appointment (T7) (± 3 months)
   9. 4-year follow-up appointment (T8) (± 3 months)
   10. 5-year follow-up appointment (T9) (± 3 months)
   11. 6-year follow-up appointment (T10) (± 3 months)

   Pre-treatment examination (T0)

   The information from the initial appointment will include demographics, medical history, and pre-treatment examination, including whenever available radiographs, intraoral scan (IOS), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and clinical photographs. Data will be registered according to the CRF.

   Guided bone regeneration surgical protocol (T1)

   The surgical protocol with any bone regeneration treatments using synthetic bone material will be registered when available in the database according to the CRF. Specific surgical procedures, flap reflection, bone graft and barrier membrane utilized will be recorded. Patient specific pre- or post-operative procedures outside normal clinic routines will be noted. Clinical photographs and radiographic evidence, if obtained during surgery or immediately after the surgery, will be registered in the CRF.

   Pre-implant control (T2)

   The information from pre-implant control visit will include updated, medical history, and pre-implant insertion examination, including whenever available radiographs, IOS, CBCT, and clinical photographs. Data will be registered according to the CRF.

   Implant insertion (T3)

   The implant placement surgical protocol data will be recorded according to the CRF when available in the database. Registrations will include implant site preparation (if manufacturer standard procedures were not followed), implant position, last drill used, implant model, length and diameter, insertion torque, vertical implant position. In addition, bone graft or soft tissue graft used, abutment or interim prostheses component details, and post-surgical management (if outside clinic normal routines) will be recorded. Clinical photographs and radiographic evidence, if obtained during surgery or immediately after the surgery, will be registered in the CRF.

   Final prosthetic delivery (T4)

   Final prosthesis component details and bone regeneration healing period will be registered together with any radiographic evaluation made at the final prosthesis delivery if available in the clinic database. This timepoint will serve as the baseline for the radiographic measurements if standardized periapical radiographs are available. Clinical photograph and IOS, if available, will be registered in the CRF.

   Follow-up appointments (T5 to T10)

   The information available from follow-up appointments can include implant manual stability, survival and success, prosthesis survival and success, hard and soft tissue status, updated medical history. Radiographs, IOS, CBCT, and clinical photographs, when available, will be registered according to the CRF.
3. Data acquisition and analysis

   Clinical registrations according to the clinical investigation specific CRF will be made registering each appointment available. The statistical evaluation will consider all collected data from pre-treatment, surgeries, and follow-up procedures.

   Radiographic examinations

   Available radiographic images will be saved clearly named with date and subject number and kept in the subject's files. The subject name is not allowed to appear in the file name or picture and should be replaced by the clinic and subject number. All radiographs will be examined by an independent radiologist. Only standardized radiographs taken using long-cone parallel technique, will be used for statistical measurements.

   CBCT scans will be acquired following the current dental clinic protocol. The images will be taken using a two-dimensional orthogonal multiplanar reformatting viewer and exported as Digital Images and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files. DICOM files will be opened using a volumetric DICOM viewer for bone evaluation and measurements (Planmeca Romexis® Viewer, Helsinki, Finland)

   Intraoral scan

   Evaluation of the soft tissue level at different timepoints will be performed if IOS is available and had been acquired according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The IOS data will be stored as stereolitography (STL) files.

   Clinical photographs

   Available digitalized vestibular pictures in TIFF or JPEG format, taken with a 1:1 right angle view of implant site or position with adjacent teeth in the picture will be saved to evaluate qualitative implant and peri-implant situation from T0 to T10.

   Implant stability

   The implant stability data will be registered in the CRF if assessed by manual testing (individual tapping or rocking with a hand instrument) without removing the implant at T3 to T10. Criteria of stable or not stable is defined as yes (stable) or no (not stable)

   Implant survival

   Implant survival will be registered if the fixture remained at the jaw and could be restored from T4 to T10.

   Implant success

   The implant success defined in accordance with the criteria proposed by van Steenberghe (1997), will be registered at all visits until (T4 to T10) if Yes or No was answered to the following statements:
   1. The implant causes allergic, toxic, or gross infectious reactions either locally or systemically.
   2. The implant offers anchorage to a functional prosthesis.
   3. The implant shows signs of fracture or bending.
   4. The implant shows signs of peri-implant radiolucency on an intra-oral radiograph using a paralleling technique strictly perpendicular to the implant-bone interface.
   5. The implant shows mobility when individually tested by tapping or rocking with a hand instrument.

   Prosthetic survival and success.

   The final prosthesis survival and success will be registered at all follow-up visits (T5 to T6) if the final prosthesis is still in situ or has it been removed (permanently or for only repair).

   Soft tissue evaluation

   Patient database and clinical photographs will be inspected to complete, when sufficient information can be gathered, pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES), status of the mucosa, plaque index, and gingival index.

   Treatment complications

   Treatment complications occurred during the implant treatment and follow-up appointments (T1 to T10) will be recorded according to the CRF. Treatment complications will be classified in biological complications, disturbances in the function of the implant characterized by biological processes affecting the tissues that support the implant, or technical, comprising mechanical damage of the implant, implant components or superstructures will be registered.
4. Ethical guidelines

   The radiographic, IOS and clinical photograph files should be clearly named with date and subject number and kept in the subject's files. The subject name is not allowed to appear in the file name or picture and should be replaced by the clinic and subject number.
5. Statistics

   Descriptive statistics including frequency tables, mean values and standard deviations will be used for results presentation per group and timepoint of examination.
6. Limitations of the study

The sample of participants in the data set is representative of a developed world city with social status to attend private dental clinic. The sample population attending the clinic may not be a powerful statistical sample for the results to be extrapolated to the human population, excluding some participants. Demographic status such as race, ethnicity, social and wealth status will not be analyzed.

Accuracy and reliability of the X rays or CBCT scanner as a method for diagnostic and measurement could be a limitation on the results.

5. Study plan

1. Stages

   This study will be a retrospective observational data collection to evaluate synthetic bone graft performance for implant related bone regeneration treatments.

   The data will be retrieved from patients that attended private dental practice and received a synthetic bone graft treatment concomitantly to an implant placement or with an indication for a delayed implant placement. Patients with a final prosthesis delivered from January 2016 to March 2022 and a minimum 1-year follow-up visit will be eligible for the study.

   The initial phase of the study will comprise the patient database search, patient inclusion, patient consent, if applicable and data registration. The duration of this phase will be approximately 2 weeks. In the second phase, demographic, clinical, and radiographic data will be assigned, based on treatment, to SP (Group 1), including a DIP procedure at 4 to 6 months after surgery, IIP plus SBG (Group 2), subdivided in healing abutment (Group 2.1) or immediate interim restoration (Group 2.2), SE lateral approach with 6 to 9 months healing period prior to DIP (Group 3) and GBR with simultaneous (4.1) or delayed implant placement (4.2). During this phase, clinical and demographic data will be recorded digitally, radiographic images will be analyzed, and quantitative data will be used to obtain statistical information. The duration of the second phase is estimated to last 4 weeks. In the final phase, the data will be reported together with a comprehensive literature review, a selection of representative figures and tables to summarize the findings, and a manuscript intended for publication in a relevant scientific journal. Four weeks will be necessary for this last phase resulting in 3 months for the study completion.
2. Responsibilities

The principal investigator will coordinate and supervise the entire project and will meet at least monthly with the relevant co-investigators who will participate in specific steps of the study, patient selection, data collection, interpretation, and reporting steps. GB will retrieve and export X rays, CBCTs, perform image analysis and data collection. JM and IG will be consulted in cases of inclusion criteria discrepancies. GB, IG and JM will interpret and report the data. All the members of the study will review the final evidence and reconsider final conclusions.

8. Ethical considerations

The retrospective clinical study will be conducted in accordance with the clinical investigation plan and all applicable laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the ICH Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), the Declaration of Helsinki, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and applicable local regulatory requirements and privacy laws.

Ethics protocol regarding file retrieval and storage can be found in section 4d to fulfill the data protection laws and protocols.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* The subject was at least 18 years of age (or age of consent) and has finalized skeletal growth at the time of surgery.
* Patient was in need of one or multiple tooth replacements.
* Treatment using synthetic bone graft was done for implant placement either in IIP or DIP.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Previous bone augmentation procedures with a different treatment choice (lateral or vertical regeneration).

Primary outcomes:
measure: Implant survival
timeFrame: From final prosthesis delivery through study completion, up to 72 months.
measure: Prosthesis survival
timeFrame: From final prosthesis delivery through study completion, up to 72 months.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Complications
timeFrame: From initial surgical procedure date (GBR or implant placement) through study completion, up to 72 months
measure: Peri-implant evaluation, marginal bone loss
timeFrame: From final prosthesis delivery through study completion, up to 72 months.
measure: Peri-implant evaluation, soft tissue evaluation PES-WES score
timeFrame: From final prosthesis delivery through study completion, up to 72 months.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Barberà del Vallès
country: Spain
facility: Cairó Franch Clinica Dental
state: Barcelona
city: Palma de Mallorca
country: Spain
facility: Clínica Dental Altes Mesquida
state: Illes Balears
Study officials:
affiliation: International Dentistry Research Group Clinical Director
name: Juan Mesquida, DDS
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: International Dentistry Research Group co-Clinical Director
name: Ignacio Ginebreda, DDS
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: