Clinical trial NCT04663269: Regional Erector Spinae Analgesic Block vs Standard of Care Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Official title: Randomized, Prospective Trial of Regional Erector Spinae Analgesic Block Versus Standard of Care in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Kidney Stone
Surgery
Lead sponsor: Indiana University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-12-10
Enrollment: 5
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to determine if adding a spinal block (medicine that will numb parts of the body to block pain) along with standard pain control at the incision site will decrease the need for narcotics for pain management and decrease the percentage of patients requiring hospital admission for pain control during postoperative , in-hospital, care after a percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (surgery to remove kidney stones), commonly called PERC.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥ 18 years Undergoing unilateral or bilateral PCNL for treatment of kidney stones Estimated glomerular filtration rate \> 30 mL/min. PCNL is planned as an outpatient procedure with no overnight hospital stay

Exclusion Criteria:

Inability to provide informed consent Pregnancy Patients having any additional simultaneous procedures other than a contralateral PCNL,(including contralateral treatment of kidney stones with a non-PCNL operation such as ureteroscopy) Patients with a documented neurologic injury that reduces pain sensation to the back Patients with an existing pain disorder Patients with an existing narcotics agreement due to current or prior narcotic abuse Patients with a documented allergy to a narcotic or NSAID analgesic BMI \> 35 Patients who require more than 1 site of percutaneous access into the kidney to adequately complete the PCNL (this is a judgment made preoperatively at the initial clinic patient encounter)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Overnight Admission Rate
timeFrame: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Narcotic for Analgesia post-operatively
timeFrame: 14 days post-op
measure: Proportion of patients with Emergency Department return or re-admission
timeFrame: 14 days
measure: Number of Narcotic administrations post-operatively
timeFrame: 14 days
measure: Number of Morphine Equivalents post-operatively
timeFrame: 14 days
measure: Number of complications peri and post-operatively
timeFrame: 24 hours
measure: Pain Score
timeFrame: 24 hours
measure: Rate of Adjunct Analgesics Post-operatively
timeFrame: 14 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Indianapolis
country: United States
facility: Methodist University
state: Indiana
Study officials:
affiliation: Indiana University
name: Tim Large, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Jonnavithula N, Pisapati MV, Durga P, Krishnamurthy V, Chilumu R, Reddy B. Efficacy of peritubal local anesthetic infiltration in alleviating postoperative pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009 May;23(5):857-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0634.
citation: Parikh GP, Shah VR, Modi MP, Chauhan NC. The analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;27(4):481-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.86591.
citation: Ozkan D, Akkaya T, Karakoyunlu N, Arik E, Ergil J, Koc Z, Gumus H, Ersoy H. Effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy : prospective randomized controlled study. Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):988-94. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2253-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
citation: Honey RJ, Ghiculete D, Ray AA, Pace KT. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intercostal nerve block after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):415-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0418.
citation: Yang H, Yu X, Hu J, Peng E, Li C, Cui L, Zhao C, Wang S, Wei C, Mei W, Wang S, Ye Z. Usage of Multilevel Paravertebral Block as the Main Anesthesia for Mini-Invasive PCNL: Retrospective Review of 45 Cases with Large Stones. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):326-330. doi: 10.1159/000480094. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
citation: Jonnavithula N, Chirra RR, Pasupuleti SL, Devraj R, Sriramoju V, Pisapati MV. A comparison of the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):655-660. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_88_17.
citation: Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Turktan M, Izol V, Aridogan A, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0479-7.
citation: Malekpour M, Hashmi A, Dove J, Torres D, Wild J. Analgesic Choice in Management of Rib Fractures: Paravertebral Block or Epidural Analgesia? Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1906-1911. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002113.
citation: Yeying G, Liyong Y, Yuebo C, Yu Z, Guangao Y, Weihu M, Liujun Z. Thoracic paravertebral block versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures. J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2085-2091. doi: 10.1177/0300060517710068. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
citation: Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
citation: Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
citation: Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 11.