Clinical trial NCT02982122: CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness
Official title: A Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing the Effect of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Monitoring in the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Homeostasis
Lead sponsor: Maastricht University Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
First posted: 2016-12-05
Enrollment: 60
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Despite improvements in management, mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains 25% and only 40% of patients survive without major handicap. Medical/surgical interventions aim to maintain adequate brain perfusion, which is critically dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP); calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). Current guidelines aim for a CPP above 50 mmHg, based on population means. However, this 'one size fits all' approach is flawed, because the relation between CPP and brain perfusion varies between individuals. Further, this approach takes no account of autoregulation, a key protective mechanism that maintains cerebral perfusion despite CPP fluctuations.

Autoregulation is variably preserved following TBI, and there are large between patient variances in the 'optimal' CPP (CPPopt) at which autoregulation operates best. Individual CPPopt can be retrieved automatically by plotting autoregulation data against the CPP over a certain time window. The investigators have shown that maintenance of CPP close to CPPopt is associated with improved outcomes. These data pose the hypothesis that optimisation of management in individuals may be achieved by using the zone of optimal autoregulation as a basis for defining individualised CPP targets.

The investigators propose, together with collaborators in the CPPopt study group (Maastricht, Cambridge, Leuven and Aachen) to set up a pilot (multicenter) feasibility study to develop a protocol for a definitive outcome randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study aims to develop protocols for CPPopt guided critical care, and show that they maintain patients closer to their optimum perfusion levels than standard protocols which keep above a population CPP threshold of 60 mmHg.

Hence, the main objective is to offer clinicians monitoring and therapy algorithms that achieve individualized optimal CPPopt targets and potentially improve TBI outcome.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Any adult severe TBI patient requiring multimodality monitoring and ICP-directed therapy for at least 24 hrs on the assessment of the recruiting team.
* Start randomization within 24 hrs after ICU admission.
* Deferred informed consent or deferred proxy assent from relatives/legal representative (consultee).
* Exception for enrolling a patient past the 24 hour window: A patient who is admitted to the hospital and later experiences neuro-worsening that is not due to a systemic insult, (e.g. myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolus, systemic hemorrhage) but due to a presumptive intracranial cause, and subsequently requires an ICP monitor, may be screened for enrolment. Consent, randomization, and monitor placement must be done within 48 hours from injury in order for the patient to qualify.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients \< 18 years old.
* Known pregnancy.
* Moribund at presentation (e.g. bilaterally absent pupillary responses)
* Patients with primary decompressive craniectomy.
* Patients already enrolled in \> 1 other research studies.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Percentage of monitoring time with measured CPP within 5 mmHg of calculated CPPopt
timeFrame: First 5 days during intensive care unit admission
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Treatment Intensity Level (TIL) score
timeFrame: First 5 days during intensive care unit admission
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Leuven
country: Belgium
facility: Academic Hospital Leuven
city: Cambridge
country: United Kingdom
facility: The Addenbrooke's Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Maastricht University Medical Center
name: Paul Roekaerts, professor
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Aries MJ, Wesselink R, Elting JW, Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Ercole A, Maurits NM, Smielewski P. Enhanced Visualization of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Over Time to Support Clinical Decision Making. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e996-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001816.
citation: Zuercher P, Groen JL, Aries MJ, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI, Ercole A, Menon DK. Reliability and Validity of the Therapy Intensity Level Scale: Analysis of Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Approach to Assess Management of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct 1;33(19):1768-1774. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4266. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
citation: Donnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Feb;15(2):169-85. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.996552.
citation: Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, Brady KM, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Smielewski P. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2456-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514eb6.
citation: Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C, Czosnyka M, Cabeleira MT, Tas J, Donnelly J, Outtrim JG, Hutchinson P, Menon D, Meyfroidt G, Depreitere B, Aries MJ, Ercole A. Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.