Clinical trial NCT05774236: Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction
Official title: Cook´s Balloon Versus Dinoprostone for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction (COLIGROW)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Fetal Growth Retardation
Keywords: Fetal Growth Restriction
Cervical Ripening
Cook's Balloon
Dinoprostone
Labor Induction
Lead sponsor: Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReN
name: Instituto de Salud Carlos III
First posted: 2023-03-17
Enrollment: 172
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-label, 2-arm parallel group, controlled trial
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare how two methods for cervical ripening work in a population of singleton pregnancies with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) at term.

The main question it aims to answer is whether Cook´s balloon (a mechanical method) is superior to vaginal dinoprostone (a pharmacological method) in achieving a vaginal delivery, without increasing neonatal morbidity.

Participants will be randomized to receive Cook´s balloon (experimental group) or vaginal dinoprostone (control group) for cervical ripening.

Researchers will compare both groups to see if Cook´s balloon is associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery than vaginal dinoprostone and is not related to increased neonatal morbidity.

Detailed description: Late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) represents the most common subtype of FGR (70-80%). The greatest risk for these fetuses appears once term pregnancy is reached, when stressful situations are added to their status of relative hypoxia, such as the appearance of contractions and funicular compression. Thus, it has been shown that from week 37-38 the risk of intrauterine mortality increases and there is a general consensus not to prolong these pregnancies beyond this period. In this situation, induction of labor is usually preferred over elective caesarean delivery. However, these fetuses have an increased risk of cesarean section for suspected fetal distress.

Mechanical methods for cervical ripening are associated with less uterine stimulation with a lower rate of tachysystole than prostaglandins. Therefore, these methods have been proposed as the optimal approach for late-onset FGR, since they could reduce the rate of cesarean sections for suspected fetal distress. However, there is no published randomized controlled trials on the use of different methods of cervical ripening for labor induction in late-onset FGR.

Thus, the investigators postulate that, in late-onset FGR, cervical ripening with a mechanical method (Cook´s balloon) achieves a higher percentage of vaginal deliveries than a pharmacological method (vaginal dinoprostone), being safe for both the mother and the newborn.

The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether cervical ripening with Cook balloon for labor induction at term gestation of singleton pregnancies with late-onset FGR achieves a higher rate of vaginal delivery compared to the use of vaginal dinoprostone, without increasing neonatal morbidity.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Singleton pregnancy
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Gestational age (GA) dated by first trimester ultrasound ≥ 37+0 weeks
* Cephalic presentation
* Stage I fetal growth restriction, defined as the presence of at least one of these two criteria:

  1. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) \< 3rd percentile
  2. EFW \< 10th percentile and at least one of the following: 2.1) Umbilical artery pulsatility index \> 95th percentile or 2.2) Cerebral-placental index \< 5th percentile
* Bishop score \< 7
* Intact fetal membranes
* No previous caesarean section
* No contraindications for vaginal delivery or labor induction.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Major fetal malformation
* Fetal genetic abnormality
* Fetal congenital infection

Primary outcomes:
measure: Rate of vaginal delivery
timeFrame: 2 days (from admission to delivery)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Rate of cesarean sections due to suspected fetal distress
timeFrame: 2 days (from admission to delivery)
measure: Induction-to-delivery interval
timeFrame: 2 days (from admission to delivery)
measure: Neonatal morbidity
timeFrame: From delivery to discharge of the newborn (up to 1 month)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Esplugues de Llobregat
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
state: Barcelona
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Clinic i Provincial
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitari Vall d&#39;Hebron
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
city: Murcia
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Study officials:
References: