Clinical trial NCT02537769: Study of the Clinical Impact of Surgical Correction of Tricuspid Insufficiency in Implantable LVAD Patients
Official title: Randomized Study of the Clinical Impact of Surgical Correction of Tricuspid Insufficiency in Implantable LVAD Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Tricuspid Regurgitation
Heart Failure NYHA Class III
Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
Keywords: LVAD
Tricuspid regurgitation
Heart failure
Transplant
3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
2D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
Mild
Moderate
Lead sponsor: University of Washington
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists
First posted: 2015-09-02
Enrollment: 40
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The use of implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has increased over the last decade; partly because the newer continuous flow pumps feature a smaller design and better durability. These pumps have shown improved outcomes for those patients who don't qualify for heart transplantation and receive the LVAD device as a permanent therapy or a bridge to heart transplantation. Despite these improved outcomes, procedure related length of hospitalization for LVAD implantation is still 2 or 3 times that of other heart surgery treatments. One important reason for this is that many people experience right ventricular dysfunction after LVAD implantation. Treatment options for this are limited. Many LVAD patients with right ventricular dysfunction also have tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR). This is the failure of the tricuspid valve (TV) to close completely so that blood leaks backwards. Some recent studies suggest that correction of the TV during LVAD implantation has improved survival for those with severe regurgitation. However, this has not been evaluated for mild or moderate regurgitation.

The goal of this study is to look at the clinical impact of surgical correction of mild to moderate TR in participants who are also undergoing LVAD implantation. The study will look at the degree of TR at various time points post-surgery, as well as any major cardiac adverse events, duration of hospitalization, and quality of life. The investigators hope to show that surgical correction of mild to moderate TR in LVAD patients will reduce right ventricular dysfunction and have a positive impact on health outcomes.

Detailed description: Participant recruitment: At University of Washington Medical Center, 30 to 40 patients with mild tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) receive LVAD placement annually. A predicted 50 - 60% of these patients will agree to be enrolled in this study, for an estimation of 15 to 20 participants a year. With an enrollment period of 2 years, the study aims to enroll 30 to 40 participants

Study interventions and Specific Techniques: Prior to screening data collection and protocol defined procedures, the participant must sign the consent form. Within 30 days prior to randomization (as part of routine clinical care), a complete transthoracic echocardiogram will be performed, evaluated, and reported. Within 7 days prior to randomization (as part of routine clinical care): 1) a medical history and physical exam is performed; 2) New York Heart Association (NYHA) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classes are established and documented; 3) all current medications and therapies are recorded on study documents; 4) the participant will complete the Duke Activity Status Index for quality of care (QOL) assessment.

Randomization: Randomization procedure will be performed intra-operatively, following sternotomy and before cannulation of aorta. Randomization will follow a computer generated simple randomization process. Participants will be randomized with equal probability to receive LVAD implantation alone or LVAD implantation plus surgical repair of their tricuspid valve (TV). The nature of the treatments precludes masking of participants and their treating clinicians to treatment assignment.

Surgical technique: Participants randomly assigned to receive tricuspid valve repair (TVR) in addition to LVAD implantation will undergo repair with standard techniques. After bicaval cannulation and with the heart beating, a right atriotomy is created and the TV exposed. A patent foramen ovale (PFO), if present, is closed primarily. 2-0 braided sutures are placed radially through the tricuspid annulus from the lateral fibrous trigone counterclockwise to the medial fibrous trigone, thus avoiding the conduction system. An incomplete semi-rigid annuloplasty ring is then suspended after appropriate sizing. Any ventricular pacing leads are then mobilized from leaflet and subvalvular adhesions and placed in the commissure between the septal and posterior leaflets. The septal and posterior leaflets are then approximated from the junction of the rough and smooth zone back to the leads, bicuspidizing the valve, and trapping the ventricular leads away from the tricuspid valve orifice.

Tricuspid valve assessment: The 3 leaflets of the TV will be assessed with echocardiography. The midesophageal inflow-outflow view and the midesophageal modified bicaval TV view will be chosen for Doppler interrogation of transvalvular flow. 3D examinations will also be assessed. 3D Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) permits the precise description of the elliptical shape of the TV annulus and its dimensions in a clinically feasible fashion.

Assessment of TR severity will include several echocardiographic parameters such as right ventricle (RV), right atrium, and inferior vena cava size, area of the regurgitant jet, width of the vena contracta (VC), proximal isovelocity surface area, TR jet density and contour, as well as hepatic vein flow patterns. The VC is a surrogate measurement for the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA). Using sequential cropping techniques that keep the cropping plane precisely parallel to the TV orifice, the vena contracta area (VCA) of the TR jet can be obtained under 3D TEE assessment.

Right ventricular function: RV diastolic function will be assessed using pulsed-wave Doppler interrogation of the tricuspid valve, the pulmonary and hepatic venous flow rates, as well as examination of the tricuspid annulus using tissue Doppler where necessary. With this, the investigators will measure the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and the Tei index. The Tei index or right ventricular index of myocardial performance (RIMP) is defined as the sum of isovolumetric contraction and relaxation intervals divided by ejection time and is an indicator of systolic and diastolic RV dysfunction.

With transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), a RIMP \> 0.40 by pulsed Doppler and \> 0.55 by tissue Doppler suggests RV dysfunction. The investigators will also measure tricuspid annular velocity using intraoperative TEE. The tissue Doppler derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (S') is an alternative parameter to assess RV function, which has been shown to correlate well with other measures of global RV systolic function. S' velocity \< 10 cm/s indicates RV systolic dysfunction.The last measurement for RV function will be the rise of the RV to right atrial pressure gradient during systole (dP/dT). The correlation of RV dP/dT with TAPSE and RV ejection fraction will represent another estimate of global RV function that can easily be determined using Doppler echocardiography.

Perioperative management: A variety of strategies may be utilized to optimize postoperative ventricular function. These strategies may include pacing, infusions of vasopressors or positive inotropic agents including both beta receptor agonists and/or phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as milrinone. Occasional participants may require additional mechanical support, either intra-aortic balloon pumping or right ventricular assist device, and Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Participant or their legal representative has signed an informed consent
2. Over 18 years of age
3. Participant with advanced heart failure symptoms (Class III or IV) and preoperative mild tricuspid regurgitation who are scheduled for an implantable LVAD

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior tricuspid valve repair
2. Any evidence of structural (chordal or leaflet) tricuspid valve disease
3. Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator
4. Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation
5. Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 45
6. Pregnancy
7. Presence of mechanical aortic valve that will not be converted to a bioprosthesis at time of LVAD implant
8. History of cardiac transplant or cardiomyoplasty
9. Psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol and LVAD management
10. Presence of active, uncontrolled infection
11. Evidence of intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values
12. History of a stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebral vascular disease with significant (\> 80%) extra cranial stenosis
13. Need for chronic renal replacement therapy (e.g. chronic dialysis)
14. Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome
15. Any condition, other than heart failure, that could limit survival to less than 1 year
16. Participant refuses to be enrolled in study
17. Institution inmates.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in TR severity assessment from baseline
timeFrame: 13 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in quality of life (QOL) from baseline
timeFrame: 13 months
measure: Change in RV function from baseline
timeFrame: 13 months
Other outcomes:
measure: Incidence of serious adverse events
timeFrame: 13 months
measure: Post-procedure renal function
timeFrame: 13 months
measure: Incidence of inotropic infusions
timeFrame: 13 months
measure: Duration of hospitalization after implant
timeFrame: Time of postoperative discharge (an expected 10 days after surgery)
Locations:
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: University of Washington Medical Center
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Washington
name: Kei Togashi, MD, MPH
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: