Clinical trial NCT06536335: Evaluation of the Perceived Experience of Patients Treated With Aligners With Two Different Timings
Official title: Evaluation of the Perceived Experience of Patients Treated With Aligners With Two Different Attachment Placement Times: Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Malocclusion
Keywords: Attachment
Discomfort
Malocclusion
Questionnaires
Lead sponsor: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-08-02
Enrollment: 24
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 40
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The primary aim of the study is to compare the perception of pain and discomfort with two different protocols of attachments' placement during clear aligner therapy: the conventional protocol (CP), when attachments' placement is performed are placed at the delivery of the first aligner; the delayed protocol (DP), when the attachments' placement is performed at the delivery of the third aligner. The rationale of this study is to evaluate whether dividing the two phases most associated with the onset of pain and discomfort, namely the initiation of aligner therapy and the placement of attachments, can improve patients' quality of life during clear aligner treatment. Patients' discomfort will be evaluated with a questionnaire adapted by OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile 14)

Detailed description: : The study was approved by the Institutional Review board of the Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy (prot. n. 17048/23). All adult patients with class I and II malocclusion referred to the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli will be consecutively enrolled for this study. All patients will be treated with Biomax Nuvola aligners built based on the individual patient's characteristics. The number of aligners and the number/ type of attachments will be chosen on the basis of the individual malocclusions.

Patients will be randomly allocated in two different groups: the study group includes patients following the delayed protocol (DP), while the control group is composed of patients' following the conventional protocol (CP). The aligner will be changed every 15 days, so the attachment placement in the DP will be performed around 30 days from the beginning of the clear aligner treatment. The modified OHIP Italian version has 20 questions categorized into 7 sections, concerning the limitation generated by deterioration of oral health in relation to clear aligners: functional, pain, psychological discomfort, physical or psychological or social disability, and handicap. The answers range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Possible categories are: never (0), rarely (1), sometimes (2), habitually (3), and very often (4). Low scores indicate better self-perception of quality of life. The customised questionnaire has 9 questions, concerning the limitation generated by discomfort caused by attachments. For 8 questions, the answers range from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Possible categories are: never (0), rarely (1), sometimes (2), habitually (3), and very often (4). Low scores indicate better self-perception of quality of life. For the last question the answer is based on NRS scale, in fact it ranges from 0 to 10. Lower score indicates less pain perceived by the patient. The questionnaires will be filled out at different phases of orthodontic treatment, specifically: at the delivery of the first aligner, after 3 and 7 days; at the delivery of the third aligner, after 3 and 7 days. The survey scheduling is arranged according to White, who stated that the patients' perception of pain and discomfort occurred within 7 days after the beginning of the orthodontic treatment; then, patients' quality of life tends to return to a baseline condition.

The study will be single-blind, because the person collecting the results and making the assessments will not know which treatment was used. In fact, the patient will anonymously submit the answers to the questionnaires uploaded on Microsoft Form, using an acronym that will be provided to him/her by the clinical operator. In this way, the person collecting and analysing the data will not know to which group the patient who sent the answers belongs.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age between 18 and 40 years;
* Class I malocclusion
* Non-extractive treatment;
* No missing teeth (third molars excluded);
* Good oral and general health.
* Signature of written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with tooth-related pain (presence of dental and/or periodontal abscesses and presence of gingivitis)
* Presence of semi-included elements;
* Patients taking bisphosphonates or other anti-resorptive drugs;
* Patients with conditions involving chronic pain and/or on chronic therapy with antifiammatories/opiods or other drugs that may act on pain perception;
* Patients with temporomandibular disorders;
* Patients with conditions that may impair the ability to objectively report any sensations of discomfort or pain (e.g., mental retardation, dementia);
* Refusal to sign the written informed consent to participate in the study

Primary outcomes:
measure: Evaluation of a possible reduction in discomfort between the two protocols
timeFrame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Different timing of onset and disappearance of pain
timeFrame: 1 year
measure: Impact on patients' quality of life
timeFrame: 1 year
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Roma
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC odontoiatria
Study officials:
affiliation: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS
name: Massimo Cordaro
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J. 2017 Mar;62 Suppl 1:58-62. doi: 10.1111/adj.12480.
citation: Bergius M, Kiliaridis S, Berggren U. Pain in orthodontics. A review and discussion of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(2):125-37. doi: 10.1007/BF01300354. English, German.
citation: Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x.
citation: Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. Pain and discomfort perceived during the initial stage of active fixed orthodontic treatment. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Apr;27(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
citation: Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;21(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00715.x.
citation: Antonio-Zancajo L, Montero J, Albaladejo A, Oteo-Calatayud MD, Alvarado-Lorenzo A. Pain and Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients During Initial Therapy with Conventional, Low-Friction, and Lingual Brackets and Aligners (Invisalign): A Prospective Clinical Study. J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 3;9(7):2088. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072088.
citation: Tamer I, Oztas E, Marsan G. Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners and The Scientific Reality Behind Their Marketing: A Literature Review. Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):241-246. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18083. eCollection 2019 Dec.
citation: White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: A randomized, prospective trial. Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):801-808. doi: 10.2319/091416-687.1. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
citation: Cardoso PC, Espinosa DG, Mecenas P, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0303-z.
citation: Almasoud NN. Pain perception among patients treated with passive self-ligating fixed appliances and Invisalign(R) aligners during the first week of orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod. 2018 Sep;48(5):326-332. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.5.326. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
citation: Franchignoni M, Giordano A, Brigatti E, Migliario M, Levrini L, Ferriero G. [Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the reduced form of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2010 Jul-Sep;32(3 Suppl B):B71-8. Italian.
citation: Thong ISK, Jensen MP, Miro J, Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012.