Clinical trial NCT04179253: Detection of the Uterine Abnormalities Missed in an Ultrasound Scan and/or Hysterosalpingography Using Hysteroscopy, in Females Presenting With Unexplained Infertility
Official title: Hysteroscopic Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Women With Unexplained Infertility
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Infertility, Female
Lead sponsor: Beni-Suef University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-11-27
Enrollment: 100
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 35
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: One hundred women with unexplained infertility recruited for office micro hysteroscopic session
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: Hysteroscopy is still considered the gold standard procedure for uterine cavity exploration. Therefore, many specialists have used hysteroscopy as their first-line of routine exam for infertility patients regardless of guidelines. Thus, scheduling the office micro hysteroscopy as one of the routine steps in the fertility workup program has become mandatory before the final diagnosis of unexplained infertility.

Detailed description: Although hysteroscopy is generally accepted as the gold standard in diagnosis and treatment of uterine cavity pathology, many gynecologist are reluctant to perform hysteroscopy as an initial test without a high degree of suspicion for pathology due to the need for anesthesia in an operating room setting. The basic infertility work-up has included a HSG to evaluate the uterine cavity and tubal patency. However, HSG does not allow for simultaneous correction of uterine pathology. Moreover HSG may miss 35% of uterine abnormalities. Hysterolaparoscopy (Pan Endoscopic) approach is better than HSG and should be encouraged as first and final procedure in selected infertile women.

Sonohysterography (SHG) has been proposed as a better diagnostic test of the uterine cavity. However, it also suffers from a sensitivity and specificity inferior to that of hysteroscopy in most studies.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Normal HSG
* Normal Ultrasound
* Normal Hormonal Profile
* Normal Semen

Exclusion Criteria:

* Abnormal findings in different investigations of infertility

Primary outcomes:
measure: Abnormal hysteroscopic findings
timeFrame: one year
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cairo
country: Egypt
facility: Beni-Suef University
Study officials:
References:
citation: Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. A systematic review of the effect of the distension medium on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.080. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
citation: Molinas CR, Campo R. Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;20(4):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Mar 22.
citation: Vaid K, Mehra S, Verma M, Jain S, Sharma A, Bhaskaran S. Pan endoscopic approach "hysterolaparoscopy" as an initial procedure in selected infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):95-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7271.4018. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
citation: Kowalczyk D, Guzikowski W, Wiecek J, Sioma-Markowska U. Clinical value of real time 3D sonohysterography and 2D sonohysterography in comparison to hysteroscopy with subsequent histopathological examination in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2012;33(2):212-6.