Clinical trial NCT05926544: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Counseling Intervention for Pharmacists
Official title: Addressing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Rural Community Pharmacies Reducing Disparities Through an Implementation Science Approach
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: COVID-19
Keywords: vaccine hesitancy
fidelity
vaccination
Lead sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: University of Arkansas
name: University of South Carolina
name: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
First posted: 2023-07-03
Enrollment: 14
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SEQUENTIAL
Intervention model description: The investigators will use an incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized design, where units (pharmacies) begin in one condition (standard implementation approach) and "crossover" to the other condition (virtual facilitation).
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to test if virtual facilitation (e.g., video coaching) increases rural pharmacists' ability to implement COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy counseling when compared to a "standard" implementation approach (e.g., training and dissemination of implementation support tools) in rural pharmacies. The main question it aims to answer is if virtual facilitation improves fidelity to a newly developed vaccine hesitancy counseling intervention when compared to standard implementation.

All participants will begin in the standard implementation condition, where they will complete a webinar on COVID-19 vaccinations and a 30-minute online training on vaccine hesitancy communication. After standard implementation, they will switch to the virtual facilitation condition where they will be assigned a virtual coach to help them with implementing the intervention. There will be four fidelity observations per each 8-week intervention period to determine whether pharmacists are implementing the intervention as intended. Researchers will compare fidelity between the standard and virtual facilitation conditions.

Detailed description: Because COVID-19 vaccination conversations are sensitive and often politically charged, pharmacists need implementation support, including training and ongoing guidance to deliver evidence-based vaccine hesitancy counseling interventions. Implementation facilitation, in which trained facilitators coach and troubleshoot problems with professionals as they implement new practices, increases adoption of practices with fidelity. However, implementation facilitation generally, and virtual facilitation (e.g., video coaching) in particular, has not been systematically studied in community pharmacy settings.

The goal of this study is to test if virtual facilitation increases rural pharmacists' ability to implement COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy counseling when compared to a "standard" implementation approach (e.g., training and dissemination of implementation support tools). Using a rural pharmacy practice-based research network (PBRN) that spans 7 southeastern states, the investigators will conduct a stepped-wedge trial with 30 rural pharmacies to test whether virtual facilitation outperforms the standard approach in increasing the fidelity with which pharmacists implement the vaccine hesitancy counseling intervention. Using a project-sponsored data collection system, the investigators will gather data on implementation outcomes, including fidelity and effectiveness.

All participants will begin in the standard implementation condition, where they will complete a webinar on COVID-19 vaccinations and a 30-minute online training on vaccine hesitancy communication. After the standard implementation period, they will crossover to the virtual facilitation condition where they will be assigned a virtual coach to help them with implementing the intervention. There will be four fidelity observations per each 8-week intervention period to determine whether pharmacists are implementing the intervention as intended. Researchers will compare fidelity between the standard and virtual facilitation conditions. Based on a proposed Fall 2023 vaccine administration schedule by the Federal Drug Administration, we anticipate implementing the study over two vaccination seasons (Fall 2023 and Fall 2024).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* The pharmacy must be a member of the Rural Research Alliance for Community Pharmacies (RURAL-CP)
* The pharmacy must be located in a county that has an African American population of at least 32.9% or had at least 58% of the population vote for a Republican president in 2020.

Exclusion Criteria:

* The pharmacy will be excluded if it does not offer COVID-19 primary series or booster vaccines.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Mean Fidelity Score
timeFrame: From baseline through the end of the virtual facilitation periods, up to 24 weeks max.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Proportion of Individuals Receiving Vaccine Hesitancy Counseling Who Chose to Get the COVID-19 Vaccine
timeFrame: From baseline through the end of the virtual facilitation periods, up to 24 weeks max.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chapel Hill
country: United States
facility: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
state: North Carolina
Study officials:
affiliation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
name: Delesha M Carpenter, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Arkansas
name: Geoffrey Curran, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Curran GM, Shoemaker SJ. Advancing pharmacy practice through implementation science. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Sep-Oct;13(5):889-891. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 1. No abstract available.
citation: Bauer MS, Miller CJ, Kim B, Lew R, Stolzmann K, Sullivan J, Riendeau R, Pitcock J, Williamson A, Connolly S, Elwy AR, Weaver K. Effectiveness of Implementing a Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Clinician Teams on Patient Outcomes and Health Status in Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0230.
citation: Curran GM, Mukherjee S, Allee E, Owen RR. A process for developing an implementation intervention: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008 Mar 19;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-17.
citation: Knox L. Module 2: Practice Facilitation as a Resource for Practice Improvement. In: Quality AfHRa, ed. pcmh.ahrq.gov: AHRQ; 2015.
citation: Parchman ML, Noel PH, Culler SD, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Romero RL, Palmer RF. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care: initial and sustained effects. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 22;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-93.