Clinical trial NCT06817122: The "Let's Talk Tech" Tool to Support Decision Making About Technology Use
Official title: Mechanistic Study of the "Let's Talk Tech" Dyadic Behavioral Intervention to Support Decision Making About Technology Use
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Dementia, Mild
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Keywords: Let&#39;s Talk Tech
shared decision aid
technology decision making
advance care planning
dyadic intervention
Lead sponsor: University of Washington
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute on Aging (NIA)
First posted: 2025-02-10
Enrollment: 240
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The goal of this research is to educate people about different technologies to support care at home when someone is experiencing memory difficulties. "Let's Talk Tech" is a new tool to educate people about technologies commonly used to support care and monitor safety, and help families talk about their feelings about them to understand each other's perspectives. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if "Let's Talk Tech" helps people feel more prepared to make decisions about technologies.

Researchers will compare Let's Talk Tech to usual care (no intervention) to see if Let's Talk Tech increases peoples' preparedness and confidence to make decisions about technologies.

Participants will:

* Use the Let's Talk Tech web application together with their study partner that takes up to an hour or do nothing.
* Complete three surveys. The second survey will be taken within 2 weeks of the first and the last survey will be taken 3 months after the first.

Detailed description: The goal of this research is to help families understand digital health technology options to support dementia care at home so they can negotiate immediate decisions and future use in an informed way. This is a mechanism-focused trial of Let's Talk Tech (LTT), a single-use, self-administered intervention in the form of a web application. It targets education and interpersonal communication processes to enable informed decision making and planning for technology use that relieves care partners of the burden of making decisions without awareness of the person's preferences. Participants are people living with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (PLWD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a care partner. The 120 enrolled dyads (60 per study group) will be randomly assigned to receive either the intervention or usual care control. The intervention is self-administered. All participants will complete measures at baseline, at post-test (2 weeks) and 3 months later. Aim 1 will test if LTT compared with usual care improves the hypothesized mechanisms of change that are care partners' technology awareness, understanding, communication satisfaction, and intention to honor the PLWD/MCI's preferences, as well as both care partner- and PLWD/MCI-reported dyadic alignment. Aim 2 will examine if and how those hypothesized mechanisms of change improve the post-test and 3-month primary outcomes of care partner preparedness and decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes of PLWD/MCI and care partner sharing of technology preferences beyond the dyad and their confidence that PLWD/MCI's preferences will be honored. Exploratory Aim 3 will examine how, with whom, and for what purpose dyad members share technology preferences and explore factors that vary for those who shared with providers vs. family/friends, with the hope of learning how to expand the reach of this intervention to activate dyads' entire care networks.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria for Patients:

* have mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia
* age 55 or older
* able to understand and speak English

Inclusion Criteria for Co-participants:

* be identified by the patient as their primary support person
* age 18 or older
* able to understand and speak English
* able to complete LTT together with their study partner at the same time

Exclusion Criteria:

* None

Primary outcomes:
measure: Preparedness to make technology decisions
timeFrame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
measure: Decisional Conflict Scale
timeFrame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
measure: Technology awareness
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
measure: Technology understanding
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
measure: Perception of PLWD/MCI's technology understanding
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
measure: Satisfaction with dyadic communication about technology
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
measure: Intention to honor preferences
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
measure: Dyadic alignment about technology use
timeFrame: baseline and 2-week post-test
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Shared technology preferences
timeFrame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
measure: Confidence preferences will be honored
timeFrame: baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: University of Washington
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Washington
name: Clara Berridge, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: