Clinical trial NCT02915068: Feasibility of a Clinician Training Program to Improve Patient-provider Communication in the Presence of Health IT Systems in the Exam Room
Official title: Feasibility of a Clinician Training Program to Improve Patient-provider Communication in the Presence of Health IT Systems in the Exam Room
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Asthma
Keywords: patient-provider communication
Electronic Health Records
Provider education
Lead sponsor: University of Michigan
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
First posted: 2016-09-26
Enrollment: 126
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: The investigators propose to modify and expand the internationally-recognized evidence-based Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) program to make it a suitable tool for training primary care clinicians on the effective use of EHRs at the point of care. The investigators will first develop the EHR edition of PACE (EHR-PACE) through literature and expert review of best practices for clinicians interacting with patients in the presence of computer systems in the exam room. They will then establish the feasibility and potential impact of EHR-PACE via a randomized design on 125 patients of 20 physicians who receive the intervention on the following outcomes via survey 3 and 6 months post-intervention: patient satisfaction with the physician's performance, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. Outcomes will be assessed on patients, but physicians will receive the intervention. Patients will not know which arm their doctor was randomized to. The pilot trial will compare two groups of primary care physicians who see patients with asthma in clinics equipped with certified EHRs. It is hypothesized that patients of physicians who receive EHR-PACE training will achieve better outcomes compared to physicians who do not receive EHR-PACE.

Detailed description: Failure in clinician-patient communication, lack of clarity regarding clinical treatment priorities, and more recently, ineffective use of health IT systems in exam rooms are associated with deficits in achieving chronic disease management goals, and increased healthcare utilization and costs. Strategies for communicating with patients in exam rooms in the presence of electronic health records (EHR) have been described in the literature. Whether such strategies are reaching clinicians and demonstrating positive health outcomes is unclear. The investigators propose to develop and test the feasibility on patient outcomes of an interactive training module that teaches clinicians best practices for communicating with patients in the presence of computer systems in the exam room (specifically EHRs). They propose to modify and expand the internationally-recognized evidence-based Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) program to make it a suitable tool for training primary care clinicians on the effective use of EHRs at the point of care. The PACE program is based on concepts and skills for strengthening communication and patient-clinician relationships through behavior change principles that are highly applicable to patients with asthma and has potential for specific application to EHR use in clinical practice. The investigators will first develop the EHR edition of PACE (EHR-PACE) through literature and expert review of best practices for clinicians interacting with patients in the presence of computer systems in the exam room. They will then establish the feasibility and potential impact of EHR-PACE via a randomized design on 125 patients of 20 physicians who receive the intervention on the following outcomes via survey 3 and 6 months post-intervention: patient satisfaction with the physician's performance, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. Outcomes will be assessed on patients, but physicians will receive the intervention.Patients will not know which arm their doctor was randomized to.The pilot trial will compare two groups of primary care physicians who see patients with asthma in clinics equipped with certified EHRs. It is hypothesized that patients of physicians who receive EHR-PACE training will achieve better outcomes compared to physicians who do not receive EHR-PACE.

EHR-PACE developed in this study is expected to have a high degree of relevance for improving the patient-provider communication skills of clinicians who see a wide range of patients in a variety of practice settings that have now integrated EHRs. Given that PACE can achieve dramatic outcomes within only two, 2-hour sessions, EHR-PACE has the potential to become an invaluable training tool to busy clinicians if proven feasible and effective. Ultimately, this work has potential for a high degree of impact.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Physicians:

1. Licensed physician in practice and board certified in primary care or family medicine
2. Treating adults with asthma
3. Full-time in a practice at an Integrated Health Associates clinic that has implemented a certified EHR system for at least one year
4. Consent to participate
5. Will generate a roster of adult asthma patients for inclusion in the study

Patients:

1. Treated by the participating physician during the study intake period
2. 18 years of age or older
3. Have a diagnosis of asthma made by a physician using the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Guidelines
4. Have at least one urgent medical care visit for asthma in the previous year
5. Have access to a telephone
6. Consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients:

1. Have other chronic disorders that have pulmonary complications

-

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline patient report of physician performance at 3 and 6 months
timeFrame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline patient satisfaction at 3 and 6 months
timeFrame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
measure: Change from baseline asthma control at 3 and 6 months
timeFrame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
measure: Change from baseline asthma-related quality of life at 3 and 6 months
timeFrame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Ann Arbor
country: United States
facility: Integrated Health Associates ClinSite Research
state: Michigan
Study officials:
affiliation: Assistant Professor
name: Minal R Patel, PhD, MPH
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: