Clinical trial NCT03694808: FLUAD vs. FLUZONE HD Influenza Vaccine in Residents of Long Term Care
Official title: Non-inferiority Study of Adjuvanted vs. High Dose Flu Vaccine in Residents of Long Term Care
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Flu
Keywords: Flu
Vaccine
Lead sponsor: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Case Western Reserve University
name: US Department of Veterans Affairs
name: Brown University
name: National Institutes of Health (NIH)
name: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
First posted: 2018-10-03
Enrollment: 478
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 65
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial to enroll 500 long term care (LTC) dwellers from at least one of 40 nursing homes sites in northern Ohio.

Age 65 and older to receive either Fluad or HD vaccine at 1:1 ratio.

Blood will be sampled pre- and post-vaccine and post-influenza season and coded for blinded laboratory analysis.

Randomization by from randomizer.org software./RedCAP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Adjuvanted flu vaccine, Fluad, is not immunologically inferior to HD influenza vaccine in older persons living in long-term care.

Detailed description: As the primary endpoint, this trial is be using pre- to post-vaccine changes in HAI titers to compare seroconversion rates and post-vaccination HAI titers to calculate the ratio of the geometric mean titers in the two treatment groups. HAI is an in vitro bioassay that determines a subject's serum levels of anti-influenza antibodies. The FDA uses this as a standard immunogenicity assay for licensure. The trial will follow guidelines set out in the FDA guidance document discussing non-inferiority immunogenicity studies. As additional methods to assess immunogenicity, an assessment of anti-NA by performing NA inhibition assays (NAI) and SVN assays will be added. A recent trial supported the use of NAI and SVN assays as a correlate for protection in a trial of geriatric subjects. A healthy human challenge model showed that NAI is more predictive of protection and reduced disease than HAI

In the large HD vaccine clinical efficacy trial (n=31,989) one third of subjects also had immunogenicity data that allowed looking for correlations of immune assays with protection. Their conclusions were that HAI and other immune assays are potential correlates of influenza vaccine protection in older adults, and that the protective thresholds for the HAI assay in the elderly appear consistent with those previously described for younger adults, provided the assay virus matches the circulating virus.

Significance Data compiled by CDC in 2011-2012 showed that there were 1,383,700 residents in NHs. Also about 4,742,500 patients received services from home health agencies, and 1,244,500 patients received services from hospices, collectively accounting for much of the frailest in the US. Overall, these provider sectors served over 8 million people annually (2013). This study will focus on residents in NHs but the findings of this study are highly relevant to persons frail enough to require such services in all of settings where the vast majority are at least 65 years old and thus appropriate for Fluad or HD, influenza vaccines licensed for this age group.

The SD influenza vaccine has diminished efficacy in the older population with the more debilitated LTC residents being among the worst responders yet with the highest mortality. Deaths due to pneumonia and influenza and chronic lung disease were 20 times higher among NH residents compared to community residents. The current availability of two vaccines specifically for the elderly that both appear to work better than SD vaccine begs the question: is the newer and less-costly Fluad vaccine non-inferior or even superior to HD vaccine? The proposed study aims to initially address non-inferiority using immunologic endpoints as this is feasible in the clinical trial R01 grant structure and a critical first step to obtain head-to-head data from the same trial, cohort and vaccine years. This proposed study itself may provide direct guidance on vaccine usage or inform a future trial assessing actual superiority should that be appropriate based on the results of this study.

HD vaccine is increasingly used by older Americans despite its greater cost over the SD vaccine and no preferential recommendation by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the CDC committee responsible for making the vaccine recommendations for the U.S. A finding of non-inferiority in the primary endpoint would provide a strong rationale to consider using Fluad over HD that could result in some cost avoidance across large long-term care system in the U.S. The trial is not powered for a superiority analysis but in a non-inferiority trial if the findings are substantial enough they may show superiority.

In the normal seasonal setting, influenza strains drift antigenically and therefore vary from year to year. The CDC's prediction many months before the vaccination season sets the composition for the next season's vaccine, but does not always correctly anticipate the exact strain match that eventually actually circulates. There are Medicare claims data and modeling in the NH population that there is a significant increase in death and hospitalization in bad match over good match years particularly when A/H3N2 predominates. In those mismatched years in particular, heterologous immunity or immunity to other non-exact match strains becomes much more important if the vaccine is going to provide any benefit that season. Fluad is an adjuvanted vaccine that has been shown to have a more broad-based or heterologous immunity than SD vaccine that is not adjuvanted. HD is also not adjuvanted. Broad based immunity is especially desirable for A/H3N2 immunity as that has had 4 different circulating strains in the last 5 years while circulating A/H1N1 has been the same for 5 years; i.e., vaccine mismatch is more likely with the A/H3N2 circulating strain. A/H3N2 is associated with the majority of influenza hospitalizations and death among the elderly.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* \> 65 years old
* Able to obtain consent from subject or legally authorized representative (subject to provide assent if cognitively/physically able to do so)
* Able to participate throughout the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

* Recent illness (within 30 days) severe enough to require hospitalization or physician-directed outpatient pharmacotherapy
* Administration of immunomodulatory agents (e.g. oral corticosteroids except prednisone \< 10 mg daily, cyclosporine, and biologics (DMARDS) for Rheumatologic/Dermatologic conditions) in the last 3 months
* Cancer requiring treatment in the past three years, except for non- melanoma skin cancers or cancers that have clearly been cured or carry an excellent prognosis including prostate cancer.
* Myocardial infarction, major heart surgery (i.e. valve replacement or bypass surgery), stroke, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in the past 4 months
* Allergies or history of significant adverse reactions to any component of influenza vaccine including egg protein and latex or after a previous dose of any influenza vaccine.
* History of Guillian-Barré Syndrome within 6 weeks of a prior influenza vaccine.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Overall Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HAI) H1N1 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HAI) H3N2 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HAI) B Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall HAI H1N1 Seroconversion Rate Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall HAI H3N2 Seroconversion Rate Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall HAI B Seroconversion Rate Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Overall Neuraminidase Inhibition (NAI) H1N1 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Neuraminidase Inhibition (NAI) H3N2 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall H1N1 NAI Seroconversion Rate Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall NAI H3N2 Seroconversion Rate Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Serum Virus Neutralization (SVN) H1N1 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Heterologous Immunity at 1 Month Post-vaccination Will be Compared Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Serum Virus Neutralization (SVN) H3N2 Titer Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Serum Virus Neutralization (SVN) H1N1 Seroconversion Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
measure: Overall Serum Virus Neutralization (SVN) H3N2 Seroconversion Between FLUAD and FLUZONE HD at 1 Month Post-vaccination.
timeFrame: 1 month post vaccine administration
Other outcomes:
measure: To Pilot Clinical Objective: Efficacy of FLUAD Will be Compared to FLUZONE HD.
timeFrame: 6-8 months post vaccine administration
Locations:
city: Cleveland
country: United States
facility: Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
state: Ohio
city: Cleveland
country: United States
facility: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
state: Ohio
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University/Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
name: David Canaday, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Brown University and Providence VA Medical Center
name: Steven Gravenstein, MD, MPH
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Ansaldi F, Bacilieri S, Durando P, Sticchi L, Valle L, Montomoli E, Icardi G, Gasparini R, Crovari P. Cross-protection by MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine: neutralizing and haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody activity against A(H3N2) drifted influenza viruses. Vaccine. 2008 Mar 17;26(12):1525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.019. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza --- United States, 1976-2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Aug 27;59(33):1057-62.
citation: DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, Kirby D, Treanor J, Collins A, Pollak R, Christoff J, Earl J, Landolfi V, Martin E, Gurunathan S, Nathan R, Greenberg DP, Tornieporth NG, Decker MD, Talbot HK. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 14;371(7):635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315727.
citation: Dunning AJ, DiazGranados CA, Voloshen T, Hu B, Landolfi VA, Talbot HK. Correlates of Protection against Influenza in the Elderly: Results from an Influenza Vaccine Efficacy Trial. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016 Jan 13;23(3):228-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00604-15.
citation: Falsey AR, Treanor JJ, Tornieporth N, Capellan J, Gorse GJ. Randomized, double-blind controlled phase 3 trial comparing the immunogenicity of high-dose and standard-dose influenza vaccine in adults 65 years of age and older. J Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 15;200(2):172-80. doi: 10.1086/599790.
citation: Frey SE, Reyes MR, Reynales H, Bermal NN, Nicolay U, Narasimhan V, Forleo-Neto E, Arora AK. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59(R)-adjuvanted with a non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly subjects. Vaccine. 2014 Sep 3;32(39):5027-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
citation: Hancock K, Veguilla V, Lu X, Zhong W, Butler EN, Sun H, Liu F, Dong L, DeVos JR, Gargiullo PM, Brammer TL, Cox NJ, Tumpey TM, Katz JM. Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):1945-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906453. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
citation: Iob A, Brianti G, Zamparo E, Gallo T. Evidence of increased clinical protection of an MF59-adjuvant influenza vaccine compared to a non-adjuvant vaccine among elderly residents of long-term care facilities in Italy. Epidemiol Infect. 2005 Aug;133(4):687-93. doi: 10.1017/s0950268805003936.
citation: Izurieta HS, Thadani N, Shay DK, Lu Y, Maurer A, Foppa IM, Franks R, Pratt D, Forshee RA, MaCurdy T, Worrall C, Howery AE, Kelman J. Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in US residents aged 65 years and older from 2012 to 2013 using Medicare data: a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71087-4. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
citation: Izurieta HS, Thadani N, Shay DK. Corrections. Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in US residents aged 65 years and older from 2012 to 2013 using Medicare data: a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):263. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70070-8. No abstract available.
citation: Mannino S, Villa M, Apolone G, Weiss NS, Groth N, Aquino I, Boldori L, Caramaschi F, Gattinoni A, Malchiodi G, Rothman KJ. Effectiveness of adjuvanted influenza vaccination in elderly subjects in northern Italy. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Sep 15;176(6):527-33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws313. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
citation: Memoli MJ, Shaw PA, Han A, Czajkowski L, Reed S, Athota R, Bristol T, Fargis S, Risos K, Powers JH, Davey RT Jr, Taubenberger JK. Evaluation of Antihemagglutinin and Antineuraminidase Antibodies as Correlates of Protection in an Influenza A/H1N1 Virus Healthy Human Challenge Model. mBio. 2016 Apr 19;7(2):e00417-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00417-16.
citation: Menec VH, MacWilliam L, Aoki FY. Hospitalizations and deaths due to respiratory illnesses during influenza seasons: a comparison of community residents, senior housing residents, and nursing home residents. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Oct;57(10):M629-35. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.10.m629.
citation: Pop-Vicas A, Rahman M, Gozalo PL, Gravenstein S, Mor V. Estimating the Effect of Influenza Vaccination on Nursing Home Residents' Morbidity and Mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1798-804. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13617. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
citation: Richardson DM, Medvedeva EL, Roberts CB, Linkin DR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenter Program. Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination in community-dwelling veterans. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 15;61(2):171-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ261. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
citation: Van Buynder PG, Konrad S, Van Buynder JL, Brodkin E, Krajden M, Ramler G, Bigham M. The comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the elderly. Vaccine. 2013 Dec 9;31(51):6122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.059. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
citation: FDA. 2007. Guidance for Industry Clinical Data Needed to Support the Licensure of Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccines. In Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
citation: 2013. Long-Term Care Services in the United States: 2013 Overview. In CDC, editor HHS, Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland.