Clinical trial NCT06202755: Ticagrelor Versus Cilostazol in Large-vessel Ischemic Stroke
Official title: Ticagrelor Versus Cilostazol in Ischemic Stroke
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Ischemic Stroke
Keywords: ticagrelor
large-vessel ischemic stroke
cilostazol
Lead sponsor: Kafrelsheikh University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-01-11
Enrollment: 580
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 75
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The investigators will conduct our single-blinded randomized controlled trial, which will contain 2 arms; the ticagrelor arm will receive (a 180 mg loading dose during the first 24 hours of stroke onset, followed by 90 mg b.i.d from the 2nd to the 90th day). The cilostazol arm will receive (a 200mg loading dose during the first 24 hours of stroke onset, followed by 100 mg twice daily from the 2nd day to the 90th day).
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Along with the current clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor administered within 24 hours of first-ever large-vessel ischemic stroke compared to 200 mg cilostazol were assessed through NIHSS, mRS, and possible adverse effects.

Detailed description: The investigators conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial between March 2024 and June 2025 after the ethics committee of the faculty of medicine at Kafr el-Sheik University approved it.

The investigators got written informed consent from all eligible patients or their first order of kin before randomization.

The study will be composed of 2 arms ticagrelor arm, which consisted of 290 patients who received a 180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg b.i.d from the 2nd to the 90th day), and the cilostazol arm consisting of 290 patients who received (a 200 mg loading dose during the first 24 hours of stroke onset followed by 100 mg twice daily from the 2nd day to the 90th day),

Study Procedures:

Every patient in our study will undergo:

clinical workup: History, clinical assessment \& NIHSS were recorded on admission, day 7, and the Modified Rankin Scale as a follow-up after one week and 3 months.

Detection of Risk Factors \& Profiles:

Echocardiography TTE : in indicated patients ECG Monitoring: daily ECG monitoring will be performed in indicated patients. 3- Carotid Duplex: carotid duplex in indicated patients.

4- ESR \& Lipid Profile\& liver functions: All will be tested routinely for all patients.

Imaging Follow UP Non-contrast CT brain on admission Day 2 MRI: after 2 days of admission, all the patients in this study will have a brain MRI (stroke protocol; T1W, T2W, FLAIR, DWI, T2 Echo Gradient, MRA of all intra-cerebral vessels).

CT brain: Any patient with unexplained clinical deterioration at any time throughout his/her hospital stay will be urgently imaged by CT.

Primary End Point:

The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of new stroke at 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was the rate of drug hemorrhagic complications using the PLATO bleeding definition.

• Secondary End Point: The secondary efficacy outcomes were to evaluate the rates of patients who achieved a significant reduction in NIHSS (decrease of four points or more) at the seventh day or discharge compared to baseline, the rates of a favorable outcome with (mRS = 0-2) after one week and after 90 days in a face-to-face interview in the outpatient clinic, rates of a composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction and death due to vascular events after 90 days of follow-up, while the secondary safety outcome was the rate of treatment-related adverse effects assessed by a follow-up questionnaire

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* the investigators included both genders with eligible ages ranging between 18-75 years, with the first-ever presentation with acute large-vessel ischemic stroke who received antiplatelet treatment within the first 24 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke. Patients with previous transient ischemic attacks (TIA) were not excluded from the study. Patients are not eligible for rt-PA treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

* he investigators excluded patients who had not been followed up on for 90 days after enrollment, those with NIHSS ≤ 3 or ≥ 25 or who had rapidly resolving symptoms before imaging results, and patients with a known history of persistent or recurrent CNS pathology (e.g., epilepsy, meningioma, multiple sclerosis, history of head trauma with a residual neurological deficit).

the investigators excluded patients who had clinical seizures at the onset of their stroke, as well as those who had symptoms of any major organ failure, active malignancies, or an acute myocardial infarction within the previous six weeks, and those who were on warfarin, regular ticagrelor during the week before admission, or chemotherapy within the previous year.

The investigators excluded patients with active peptic ulcers, GIT surgery, bleeding history within the last year, and those with a history of major surgery within the last three months.

The investigators ruled out of our trial patients who had a known allergy to the study drugs and those with INR \> 1.4 or P.T. \>18 or blood glucose level \< 50 or \> 400 mg/DL or blood pressure \< 90/60 or \> 185/110 mmHg on admission or Platelets \< 100,000.

The investigators excluded pregnant and lactating patients and those with stroke due to venous thrombosis and stroke following cardiac arrest or profuse hypotension ineligible for our trial.

Primary outcomes:
measure: rate of new stroke
timeFrame: 90 days
measure: Rate of drug-related hemorrhagic complications
timeFrame: 90 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Value of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after one week
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: value of Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at one week
timeFrame: 7 days
measure: value of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS) at three months
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: rate of composite recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death due to vascular events
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: rate of drug adverse effects
timeFrame: 90 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Kafr Ash Shaykh
country: Egypt
facility: Kafr Elsheikh University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: neurology department kafr el-sheikh university
name: mohamed G. Zeinhom, MD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Zeinhom MG, Aref HM, El-Khawas H, Roushdy TM, Shokri HM, Elbassiouny A. A pilot study of the ticagrelor role in ischemic stroke secondary prevention. Eur Neurol. 2022;85(1):50-55. doi: 10.1159/000518786. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
citation: Paciaroni M, Ince B, Hu B, Jeng JS, Kutluk K, Liu L, Lou M, Parfenov V, Wong KSL, Zamani B, Paek D, Min Han J, Del Aguila M, Girotra S. Benefits and Risks of Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin Monotherapy after Recent Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Dec 1;2019:1607181. doi: 10.1155/2019/1607181. eCollection 2019.
citation: Meyer DM, Albright KC, Allison TA, Grotta JC. LOAD: a pilot study of the safety of loading of aspirin and clopidogrel in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):26-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.09.006.
citation: Gachet C, Stierle A, Cazenave JP, Ohlmann P, Lanza F, Bouloux C, Maffrand JP. The thienopyridine PCR 4099 selectively inhibits ADP-induced platelet aggregation and fibrinogen binding without modifying the membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex in rat and in man. Biochem Pharmacol. 1990 Jul 15;40(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(90)90683-c.