Clinical trial NCT04341714: Efficiency and Satisfaction With Telephone Consultation in Neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Official title: Efficiency and Satisfaction With Telephone Consultation in Neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Efficacy, Self
Satisfaction, Patient
Telemedicine
Keywords: telemedicine
neurourology
efficacy
satisfaction
Lead sponsor: Pierre and Marie Curie University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-04-10
Enrollment: 450
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients with telephone consultation in a tertiary center in neuro-urology

Brief summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated drastic measures in order to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The stay home policies for the whole population and especially for frail patients and the express instruction to deprogram non-urgent consultations and interventions limited the clinic visits in neuro-urology department. In this context, telemedicine was seen as a pragmatic solution to provide follow-up care for our neurologic patients. Due to the delay in deploying telemedicine and the cognitive impairment of some of our patients, telephone consultation has been prioritized.

The COVID-19 pandemic might be an opportunity to review and refine our practices in neuro-urology. For the follow-up of selected patients, telephone consultations may be efficient and cost effective.

The aim of the study is to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction with telephone consultation for the physician and the patient.

The study was conducted in a neuro-urology department of a university hospital in France.

During the stay-home policies for the COVID-19 pandemic, all the scheduled medical visits were converted into telephone consultation. New patients weren't included.

For each teleconsultation, the physician assess the duration of the consultation, the number of tries to join the patient, the efficiency of the consultation, the difficulty to obtain relevant information due to the phone way of the consultation and the lack of physical examination.

On the next days, the patient was contacted by phone and was asked a) if he was satisfied of being phoned by the physician, b) if the teleconsultation was embarrassing, c) if he had enough time of teleconsultation d) if he got all the answers to his queries, e) if he would preferred to had a physical consultation f) to assessed the global satisfaction of the teleconsultation and g) if in the future, they may considered converting some clinic visits to teleconsultations.

The physician and the patient assessed whether this teleconsultation has replaced a physical visit.

The usual transport mode of the patient for a clinic visit and the need to take a day off for worker patients were recorded.

The primary aim was to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction of the telephone consultation. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on a numerical 10-points scale. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient on a numerical 10-points scale.

Four hundred teleconsultations are scheduled for five physicians.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Telephone consultation

Exclusion Criteria:

* New patient in the department

Primary outcomes:
measure: Efficiency of the telephone consultation
timeFrame: 1 day
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Satisfaction of the telephone consultation
timeFrame: 1 day
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon
Study officials:
affiliation: Sorbonne Université, GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France
name: Gérard Amarenco, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: