Clinical trial NCT03442738: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Adenoma Detection Rate With a Disposable Cap (ENDOCUFF VISION®)
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy With and Without a Disposable Cap (ENDOCUFF VISION®)
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Adenoma Detection Rate
Keywords: ADR
adenoma
polyp
colon
screening
colorectal carcinoma (CRC)
cap
endoscopy
colonoscopy
private practice
Lead sponsor: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Norgine
First posted: 2018-02-22
Enrollment: 1382
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 55
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: CASE_ONLY
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Screening Population for Adenoma and CRC

Brief summary: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ENDOCUFF VISION® (caps with soft, about 1 cm long lateral feet of rubber ("Endocuff") to flatten the colon folds) on ADR in a real-life setting (general practices) and in a homogenous patient collective (screening colonoscopies only).

It is a prospective randomized multi centric study, with participation of at least 10 study sites (private practice). The study is an inverstigator-initiated trial (IIT).

Depending on the randomization (closed envelope), the patients are examined with the standard instruments without or with ENDOCUFF VISION®.

Group 1: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes with ENDOCUFF VISION® Group 2: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes without cap

Detailed description: Colonoscopy is currently the best method for the detection of colon carcinomas and, as precursor, adenomas, since these can also be biopsied and removed. Therefore, the screening colonoscopy was introduced at the end of 2002 (covered by state insurance) from the age of 55. The main quality parameter for outcome quality is the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which correlates with the rate of the carcinomas prevented. However, since even smaller polyps, especially if they are flat or sunken, may be relevant for colon cancer development, the aim of colonoscopy should be to be able to recognize and remove as many adenomas as possible. There is a need to optimize the efficiency of screening colonoscopy by increasing the rate of adenoma detection, as it is known from many studies that approximately 15-30% of adenomas can be missed- even though the adenoma rate in the German screening colonoscopy register continues to increase over the years and currently stands at 28%.

Previous studies on the increase of the adenoma detection rate by endoscopy concerning newer endoscope technologies including conventional caps have been almost entirely negative.

For about 2 years, a newer version of ENDOCUFF VISION® caps (caps with soft, about 1 cm long lateral feet of rubber (Endocuff) to flatten the colon folds) is available which has already been used in about 8,000 colonoscopies in Germany and another 10,000 colonoscopies in Europe; there are no studies on this version of Endocuff caps.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ENDOCUFF VISION® in a real-life setting (general practices) and in a homogenous patient collective (screening colonoscopies only).

It is a prospective randomized multi centric study, with participation of at least 10 study sites (private practice). The study is an inverstigator-initiated trial (IIT).

A new technique for ADR improvement within colonoscopy can only be tested in a comparative study in two groups comparing the adenoma rate between the two groups. An independent gold standard does not exist in this sense, but the confirmation by the endoscopically taken histology serves as gold standard for the diagnosis adenoma. The alternative of double examinations (tandem colonoscopy) in each patient is in the setting of private practice not feasible.

Depending on the randomization (closed envelope), the patients are examined with the standard instruments without or with ENDOCUFF VISION®.

Group 1: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes with ENDOCUFF VISION® Group 2: screening colonoscopy with standard colonoscopes without cap

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* \> 55 years
* who voluntarily undergo a screening colonoscopy
* information and signed declaration of consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* symptoms that may indicate a colonic disease
* rectal/colonic bleeding
* known colon disease for further diagnosis, e.g. Carcinoma, polyps for erosion, inflammatory bowel disease, stenosis
* follow-up/surveillance after colon carcinoma surgery or polypectomy
* anticoagulant drugs that make a biopsy or polypectomy impossible
* poor general condition (from ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification) III)
* partial/incomplete colonoscopy planned

Primary outcomes:
measure: Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in the two study groups
timeFrame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: ADR (all adenoma/all patients)
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by location
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by size
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by form
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by histology
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by adjustability
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: assessment of adenoma subgroups by resection practice
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Intervention times
timeFrame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
measure: procedure technique
timeFrame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Gastroenterologische Spezialpraxis am Wittenbergplatz
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Gemeinschaftspraxis Hohenzollerndamm
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Praxis Dr. Mayr
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Praxis für Gastroenterologie in Berlin Reinickendorf
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Praxis Dr. med. Jens Aschenbeck
city: Hamburg
country: Germany
facility: Gastropraxis Eppendorfer Baum
city: Hamburg
country: Germany
facility: Schwerpunktpraxis CCB Bergedorf
city: Hamburg
country: Germany
facility: Magen-Darm-Zentrum, Facharztzentrum Eppendorf
Study officials:
affiliation: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
name: Thomas Rösch
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
citation: Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
citation: Bretagne JF, Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):523-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995786. Epub 2008 May 8. No abstract available.
citation: van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
citation: Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Kretschmann J, Rosch T, Pox C, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):356-66.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
citation: Moriyama T, Uraoka T, Esaki M, Matsumoto T. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2015 Apr;27 Suppl 1:40-4. doi: 10.1111/den.12428.
citation: Omata F, Ohde S, Deshpande GA, Kobayashi D, Masuda K, Fukui T. Image-enhanced, chromo, and cap-assisted colonoscopy for improving adenoma/neoplasia detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;49(2):222-37. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.863964. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
citation: Nagorni A, Bjelakovic G, Petrovic B. Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.
citation: Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, Strobel P, Bohme R, Schepke M, Meister T. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):413-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166.
citation: Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, Roming H, Ameis D, Heinecke A, Kunsch S, Ellenrieder V, Strobel P, Schepke M, Meister T. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114267. eCollection 2014.
citation: van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A, Wientjes CA, Mallant-Hent RC, Siersema PD, Tytgat K, Tuynman H, Kuiken SD, Houben G, Stokkers P, Moons L, Bossuyt P, Fockens P, Mundt MW, Dekker E. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
citation: Adler A, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Yenerim T, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Roll S, Rosch T. Latest generation, wide-angle, high-definition colonoscopes increase adenoma detection rate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.026. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
citation: Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, Mayr M, Aminalai A, Drossel R, Schroder A, Scheel M, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):410-6.e1; quiz 715. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
citation: Adler A, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mross M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Keining C, Stange G, Wiedenmann B, Gauger U, Altenhofen L, Rosch T. Data quality of the German screening colonoscopy registry. Endoscopy. 2013 Oct;45(10):813-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344583. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
citation: Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, Abou-Rebyeh H, Schachschal G, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Khalifa AC, Setka E, Koch M, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008 Jan;57(1):59-64. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.123539. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
citation: Adler A, Roll S, Marowski B, Drossel R, Rehs HU, Willich SN, Riese J, Wiedenmann B, Rosch T; Berlin Private-Practice Gastroenterology Working Group. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1). Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1628-38. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9029-y.
citation: Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Mayr M, Mross M, Scheel M, Schroder A, Gerber K, Stange G, Roll S, Gauger U, Wiedenmann B, Altenhofen L, Rosch T. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):236-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300167. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
citation: Aminalai A, Rosch T, Aschenbeck J, Mayr M, Drossel R, Schroder A, Scheel M, Treytnar D, Gauger U, Stange G, Simon F, Adler A. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2383-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.273. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
citation: Schachschal G, Mayr M, Treszl A, Balzer K, Wegscheider K, Aschenbeck J, Aminalai A, Drossel R, Schroder A, Scheel M, Bothe CH, Bruhn JP, Burmeister W, Stange G, Bahr C, Kiesslich R, Rosch T. Endoscopic versus histological characterisation of polyps during screening colonoscopy. Gut. 2014 Mar;63(3):458-65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304562. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
citation: Schachschal G, Sehner S, Choschzick M, Aust D, Brandl L, Vieth M, Wegscheider K, Baretton GB, Kirchner T, Sauter G, Rosch T. Impact of reassessment of colonic hyperplastic polyps by expert GI pathologists. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;31(3):675-83. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2523-8. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
citation: Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Sehner S, Rosch T, Aschenbeck J, Schroder A, Schubert S, Liceni T, Aminalai A, Spitz W, Mohler U, Heller F, Berndt R, Bartel-Kowalski C, Niemax K, Burmeister W, Schachschal G. Second-generation distal attachment cuff for adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy: a randomized multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jan;97(1):112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Aug 27.