Clinical trial NCT04553081: 2DR Versus 3DR in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Switch Trial
Official title: Virological and Immunological Assessment in HIV Positive Participants on 2DR Versus 3DR in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Switch Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: HIV-1-infection
Keywords: HIV
dual therapy
triple therapy
virological control
immune activation
metabolic complications
Lead sponsor: University Hospital, Ghent
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: ViiV Healthcare
First posted: 2020-09-17
Enrollment: 134
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of this study is to monitor virological and immunological markers in participants who are switching from a classic triple drug regimen (3DR) to dual therapy (2DR). We aim to monitor whether this has an influence on different parameters such as severity of HIV disease (evaluated by viral load and viral reservoir size), presence of non-AIDS related health complications, impact the phenotype and function of the immune system.

By conducting this study we want to assess whether switching from 3DR to 2DR implies an increased risk for 'subclinical' failure. We especially want to make sure that this switch does not increase the HIV reservoir, does not increase inflammation or immune exhaustion in patients living with HIV and that it can be considered as a safe long term alternative for the classic 3DR.

The primary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority at W48 of the 2DR DTG/3TC (Dovato) regimen compared to BIC/TAF/FTC (Biktarvy) in terms of the amount of intact replication competent HIV sequences with a non-inferiority margin of 12% quantified by the fraction intact HIV viral sequences quantified by an intact proviral DNA assay, present in blood CD4 cells.

Detailed description: In HIV care we have been facing a paradigm change over the last years, reaching an ultimatum with the reimbursement of a 2DR regimen both in naïve as in switch patients.

The rationale behind dual therapy is interesting, namely lower cost, less side-effects, more preserved treatment options, less interactions.

However, from a patient and clinician's perspective this requires a paradigm change after an era of successful treating patient with 3DR.

In the past 2DR and even 1DR treatments have been proposed as an alternative for 3DR, however results were often disappointing and these regimens were only suitable for a selection of patients, often requiring intensification of follow-up.

Recently dual therapy with integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has shown very promising results both in switch (TANGO study) with no virological failure related to this regimen over 48 weeks and in naïve patients (GEMINI study) with no resistance mutations at 96 weeks. Moreover, time to undectability was statistically not different from the 3DR group and the small amount of data available on in depth analysis of the reservoir and immunological parameters were reassuring.

Comparative data however on immunological and virological parameters are lacking therefore we want to conduct the present clinical trial to further elaborate on this important question.

Recent data show that newer ARVs, among which integrase inhibitors and TAF, are associated with weight gain. Further data is required to investigate the patterns of weight change with these ARVs and any associated metabolic impact.

So far, DTG/3TC has been assessed in 3 phase III clinical trials: GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2 and TANGO. GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 are two large identically designed phase 3 studies that compare the 2DR DTG+3TC once daily with a first-line recommended 3DR DTG + 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/FTC) once daily in treatment-naïve People living with HIV (PLHIV) (Cahn 2019). The primary objective of TANGO is to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to the continuation of TAF-based regimens (TBR) over 48 weeks in ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PLHIV (Van Wyk 2020). The primary results of these trials have been published (Cahn 2019, Van Wyk 2020) while the trials continue in order to collect longer-term data.

GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 are 2 twin phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group, noninferiority studies conducted in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 RNA of 1000 to ≤500,000 c/mL at screening. Patients are randomised 1:1 to receive DTG+3TC once daily or DTG plus FDC tablet of TDF/FTC once daily. The results of GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2, and the pooled analysis demonstrated that DTG+3TC has a high level of efficacy and safety and is noninferior to 3DR DTG+TDF/FTC. In the pooled analysis, 91% of patients in the DTG+3TC arm and 93% of patients in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL by Week 48. The Week 96 secondary efficacy analysis demonstrated that DTG+3TC continued to provide a high level of clinical efficacy. A similar proportion of subjects in each treatment group achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 96 for GEMINI-2 and pooled analysis. Based on the Food and drug administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm, DTG+3TC is noninferior to DTG+TDF/FTC in the individual studies as well as the pooled analysis at Week 48 and at Week 96. The subgroup analyses further supported the noninferiority of DTG+3TC at both Week 48 and Week 96. Moreover, few patients experienced CVW by Week 48, with comparable rates across treatment arms (\<1% in each) and fewer AEs were observed in the DTG+3TC arm compared to DTG+TDF/FTC. No treatment-emergent resistance mutation were observed in these patients up to Week 96, demonstrating DTG+3TC's high barrier to resistance. The incidence of drug-related AEs at Week 48 in the DTG+3TC arm was low (126/716; 18%) and lower than that in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm (169/717; 24%). The most common (≥1%) drug-related Grade 2-4 AE in both arms was headache (1% in both arms). Low rates of drug-related AEs were also observed at Week 96 for both arms, with slightly more but comparable overall AEs and slightly more drug-related AEs in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm compared with the DTG+3TC arm.

TANGO is a 200-week, phase 3, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study to assess the noninferior antiviral activity and safety of replacing a TBR with a 2DR of DTG+3TC in HIV-infected adults who are virologically suppressed and stable on TBR (Van Wyk 2020). The results of TANGO demonstrate that DTG+3TC has a high level of efficacy and safety for patients switching from TBR. Based on the FDA Snapshot virologic failure, DTG+3TC is noninferior to TBR at Week 24 (Ait-Khaled 2019, Van Wyk 2020). Very few (\<1%) patients experienced virologic failure in both treatment arms. Only one patient in the TBR arm had a CVW by Week 24. A greater proportion of patients in the DTG+3TC arm experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (but not drug-related SAEs), drug-related adverse events (AEs), and AEs leading to withdrawal from the study compared with the TBR arm in the first 24 weeks of the study as expected due to the switch study design.

The various clinical trials ongoing and planned for DTG/3TC are further supported by real-world evidence. These real-world studies have findings consistent with the results observed in clinical trials.

The primary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority at W48 of the 2DR DTG/3TC (Dovato) regimen compared to BIC/TAF/FTC (Biktarvy) in HIV-1 infected individuals in terms of the amount of intact replication-competent HIV-1 sequences with a non-inferiority margin of 12% quantified by the fraction intact HIV viral sequences quantified by IPDA, present in blood CD4 cells.

1. Quantification of immune activation markers in both arms, will be explored as secondary objective and should not differ more than 20%. The power calculation is however calculated based on the primary objective.

   Assessment at baseline, W48 and W144.
   * Inflammation markers: IL-6, hs-CRP (of CRP) (other: IL_8, IP10, TNF, B2M, CXCL1, IL21, Hyaluric acid)
   * Markers of coagulopathy: D-Dimers
   * T cell activation markers: HLA-DR, CD38 on both CD4 and CD8; soluble markers: sCD27, sCH40 ligand
   * T cell exhaustion markers: PD-1, CD28, CD57
   * Markers of microbial translocation: sCD14
   * CD4/CD8 ratio
2. In addition, the secondary objective is to assess impact of the DTG/3TC vs BIC/FTC/TAF on metabolic health. Therefore, as secondary endpoint metabolic health will be assessed through incidence of metabolic syndrome, weight/BMI change, waist circumference, and insulin resistance. Finally, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans will be performed to assess body composition and fat distribution and bone mineral density and FibroScans will be performed to assess liver steatosis and fibrosis.
3. As a third secondary objective we will assess the impact of switching through a patient questionnaire.
4. The fourth secondary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority at W144 of the 2DR DTG/3TC (Dovato) regimen compared to BIC/TAF/FTC (Biktarvy) in HIV-1 infected individuals in terms of the amount of intact replication-competent HIV-1 sequences with a non-inferiority margin of 12% quantified by the fraction intact HIV viral sequences quantified by IPDA, present in blood CD4 cells.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age = or \>18 years.
* Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.
* Ability to attend the complete schedule of assessments and patient visits.
* Ability and willingness to have blood samples collected and stored indefinitely and used for various research purposes.
* HIV RNA \< 50 copies/mL for at least 3 months on a 2nd generation INSTI based regimen.
* Females of childbearing potential should be on effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

* Current presence of opportunistic infection (AIDS defining events as defined in category C of the CDC clinical classification).
* Evidence of active HBV infection (Hepatitis B surface antigen positive or HBV viral load positive in the past and no evidence of subsequent seroconversion (seroconversion= HBV antigen or viral load negative and positive HBV surface antibody).
* Evidence of active HCV infection: HCV antibody positive result within 60 days prior to study entry with positive HCV viral load or, if the HCV antibody result is negative, a positive HCV RNA result within 60 days prior to study entry.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Patients unable to understand the study protocol or any other condition that in the investigator's opinion may compromise compliance with the study protocol
* Decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B/C)
* Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (apart from hyperbilirubinemia or jaundice due to Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones)
* Psychiatric and psychological disorders, which in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the trial conduct or safety of the participant.
* Previous participation in a trial evaluating an immune modulating agent.
* Active drug or alcohol use/addiction such that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
* Treatment failure on an integrase inhibitor containing regimen and reported baseline resistance
* Creatinine Clearance \<50
* Tuberculosis treatment
* Documented M184V
* Previous virological failure \>200 copies/mL on NRTI
* Subjects with history or presence of allergy to any of the study drugs or their components
* ALT \>5 times the ULN, OR ALT \>3xULN and bilirubin \>1.5xULN (with \>35% direct bilirubin)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Difference in amount of intact replication-competent HIV-1 sequences in CD4 cells between 2 regimens
timeFrame: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Full length sequencing of the virus
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of interleukin-6 (IL-6)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of D-Dimers
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of Human Leukocyte Antigen - DR isotype (HLA-DR)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of soluble cluster of differentiation 27 (sCD27)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of soluble cluster of differentiation 40 (sCD40)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of cluster of differentiation 57 (CD57)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of CD4/CD8 ratio
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Incidence of metabolic syndrome
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Weight/body mass index (BMI) change
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Waist circumference
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Insuline resistance
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: FibroScans
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Switch questionnaire
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Duplex carotis
timeFrame: 240 weeks
measure: Quantification of lipoproteine A
timeFrame: 168 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Ghent
country: Belgium
facility: Ghent University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospital, Ghent
name: Linos Vandekerckhove
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: