Clinical trial NCT05242614: The Effects of a Hybrid Face-To-Face and Online Mode of Delivering a Mindfulness-Based Dementia Caregiving Programme for Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Official title: The Effects of a Hybrid Face-To-Face and Online Mode of Delivering a Mindfulness-Based Dementia Caregiving Programme for Family Caregivers of Persons With Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Caregiver Burden
Lead sponsor: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-02-16
Enrollment: 290
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: This study is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial, with an intervention group (mindfulness group) and a control group. The participants in the MBI group will receive 6 weekly 90-minute group-based sessions delivered through a face-to-face and online approach. The participants in control group will receive brief education on dementia care with the same group size, duration, and frequency as the sessions in the intervention group.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) has been shown promising effects in enhancing the well-being of caregivers of patients with dementia (PWD). However, the time schedule and the mode of delivering the conventional MBI was demanding to family caregivers of PWD, and therefore impeding the feasibility of use among caregivers. Our research team had developed a hybrid MBI program which includes face to face and online mode of mindfulness sessions w. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this 6-week hybrid MBI program on caregivers of PWD over a 6-month follow up. This study is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Participants are family caregivers of PWD and we aimed to recruit 290 subjects. Eligible participants will be recruited from three local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Hong Kong. They will be randomly allocated into MBI group and a control group (with 145 participants in each group) . The participants in the MBI group will receive 6 weekly 90-minute group-based sessions delivered through a face-to-face and online approach. The participants in control group will receive brief education on dementia care with the same group size, duration, and frequency as the sessions in the intervention group. Assessment (using questionnaire) about caregiving stress and other outcomes (positive aspect of caregiving, depression, dyadic relationship, anxiety, neuropsychiatric symptoms of patients) will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention and at the 6-month follow up. Focus group interview will also be conducted to explore family caregivers' experience in participating in the program. We aimed to recruit 20 caregivers for the interviews via purposive sampling. It is hypothesized that compared to the control group, the MBI group will have a reduction on caregiving stress and improve other outcomes after the intervention.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Caregivers who are aged 18 or above
* Caregivers who are taking care for a family member medically diagnosed with dementia who has been residing in the community;
* Caregivers who are providing care to the dementia care recipients for at least 6 months prior to the subject recruitment.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Caregivers who have participated in any structured psychosocial intervention or mindfulness-based intervention/training in the 6 months prior to recruitment,
* Caregivers who have acute psychiatric and medical comorbidities that are potentially life-threatening (e.g., suicidal ideation) or leave them with a limited ability to participate or adhere to the intervention (e.g., acute psychosis),
* caregivers who do not have Internet access.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in perceived Stress scale of caregivers
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in depressive symptoms of caregivers
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
measure: Change in positive caregiving experience of caregivers
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
measure: Change in caregiving burden of caregivers
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
measure: Change in dyadic relationship
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
measure: Change in heart rate variability of caregivers
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
measure: Change in neuropsychiatric symptoms of the care recipients
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
Other outcomes:
measure: Level of mindfulness
timeFrame: baseline, immediately after the intervention, 6 month- after the intervention
Locations:
Study officials:
References:
citation: Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
citation: Roberts RE, Vernon SW. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Jan;140(1):41-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.1.41.
citation: Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Scale for positive aspects of caregiving experience: development, reliability, and factor structure. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;22(2):62-9.
citation: Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649. No abstract available.
citation: Sebern MD, Whitlatch CJ. Dyadic relationship scale: a measure of the impact of the provision and receipt of family care. Gerontologist. 2007 Dec;47(6):741-51. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.6.741.
citation: Vanderlei LC, Silva RA, Pastre CM, Azevedo FM, Godoy MF. Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008 Oct;41(10):854-9. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008005000039. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
citation: Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
citation: Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.
citation: Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308.
citation: Kor PPK, Li ML, Kwok DKS, Leung AYM, Lai DLL, Liu JYW. Evaluating the effectiveness of a 6-week hybrid mindfulness-based intervention in reducing the stress among caregivers of patients with dementia during COVID-19 pandemic: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;10(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00876-8.