Clinical trial NCT03622931: Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer (2nd and 3rd Line) Treated With Chemotherapy According to AGO Guidelines
Official title: Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-induced Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer (2nd or Further Line)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Ovarian Cancer
Keywords: ovarian
cancer
romiplostim
nplate
Lead sponsor: Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Innovation - Hamatologie und Onkologie mbH
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2018-08-09
Enrollment: 21
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: 74 patients (about 37 in the experimental and 37 in the placebo arm), evaluable for the principal efficacy endpoint, are required. These will be recruited from an expected number of 15 sites.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: To evaluate the safety of secondary chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (reduction in platelets which leads to bleeding) prophylaxis with romiplostim in ovarian cancer subjects receiving myelosuppressive (blood cell damaging) chemotherapy.It is anticipated that Romiplostim, when administered at an effective dose and schedule, will be a well-tolerated treatment for subjects experiencing chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Detailed description: Chemotherapy of recurrent ovarian cancer leads to severe thrombocytopenia in a considerable proportion of the patients, requiring treatment delays or dose reductions, and placing the patient at a high risk of bleeding complications. The amount of thrombocytopenia is highly schedule-dependent. In platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer that relapsed more than 6 months after end of primary therapy, a platinum containing reinduction therapy - the combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin, gemcitabine/carboplatin or PLD/carboplatin - is recommended according to the current AGO guidelines or recent ASCO presentations. Especially the latter two regimens often induce severe and even dose-limiting myelosuppression, including thrombocytopenia. Therefore, prophylaxis, or at least secondary prophylaxis of this toxicity is an important goal of supportive therapy. The use of platelet transfusions is limited by cost, supply problems, and associated risks, such as transfusion reactions, transmission of infection, and alloimmunization and platelet refractoriness. In contrast to the situation for the red and white blood cell compartments, the implementation of growth factor treatment in order to ameliorate the therapy of thrombocytopenia and its complications, is yet very limited. Romiplostim is an active second-generation thrombopoietic agent without safety problems due to immunogenicity, which proved to be beneficial in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura and myelodysplastic syndromes. The rationale of this trial is to obtain evidence that romiplostim can improve platelet counts/recovery in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Due to the fact, that the expected occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia and its complications may heavily depend on the selection of patient and their characteristics such as actually chosen treatment schedule, tumor stage, extent of metastasis, pre-treatment etc. a phase II design comparing the results to historical data or expectations is insufficient. A simple within-group control design, comparing subsequent cycles of the same patients with or without the supportive experimental drug may also be flawed, as "spontaneous" improvements after obviously unchanged chemotherapy are often observed. With some regimens, the first cycle proves to be generally more toxic than later ones. On the other hand, regimens may result in cumulative myelosuppression. A design including a randomized doubleblind control group is therefore warranted, moreover, as platelet counts represent a sensitive and valid surrogate marker for a clinical benefit. The current study will employ a model of secondary prophylaxis. The enrolment of subjects with grade 3 and/or 4 thrombocytopenia will facilitate an assessment of the ability of romiplostim to impact thrombocytopenia at clinically significant levels, which warrant the administration of platelet transfusions, dose reduction, and dose delay.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Women ≥ 18 years of age
* Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained, according to ICH-GCP, and national/local regulation
* ANC ≥ 1,000/μl, Hgb ≥ 9.5 g/dl, and platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/l on day 1 of the first on study cycle of the chemotherapy treatment (on-study cycle) (Thrombocytopenia have to be defined during a "qualifying cycle"; qualifying cycle could be the 1st or the 2nd cycle of the palliative chemotherapy; thrombocytopenia as evidenced by a platelet count \< 50 x 109/l during the qualifying cycle of chemotherapy OR platelet count \< 100 x 109/l on the planned starting day of the next cycle of chemotherapy (or 1-3 days before), requiring dose delay for platelet recovery.)
* Subjects with histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, peritoneal carcinoma or ovarian carcinosarcoma who are receiving 2nd or further line chemotherapy consisting of one of the following regimens according to established dosing standards:

  1. Topotecan, d 1-5, q3w
  2. Gemcitabine, d1+8, q3w
  3. Carboplatin / paclitaxel, d1, q3w
  4. Carboplatin d1 /gemcitabine, d1+d8, q3w
  5. Carboplatin / pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, d1, q4w
  6. Carboplatin d1 / gemcitabine, d1+d8, Avastin d1, q3w
  7. Topotecan d1-5 + avastin, q3w
  8. Carboplatin + paclitaxel + avastin, q3w
* Thrombocytopenia as evidenced by a platelet count \< 50 x 109/l during the qualifying cycle of chemotherapy OR platelet count \< 100 x 109/l on the planned starting day of the next cycle of chemotherapy (or 1-3 days before), requiring dose delay for platelet recovery; qualifying cycle could be the 1st or the 2nd cycle of chemotherapy
* Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks at the time of screening
* Ability to receive the same dose and schedule of chemotherapy during the first on study treatment cycle as was given in the qualifying cycle(s). (In case of grade 4 thrombocytopenia: a dose reduction to ≥75% of the previous dose schedule is allowed.)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Previous treatment with PEG-rHuMGDF, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), romiplostim, eltrombopag, or another thrombopoietic protein
* Past or current history of malignancies that affect the overall prognosis (Please note: patients with past or current malignancies not affecting the overall prognosis are allowed for enrollment)
* Subjects, who have had a larger surgery within the last 2 weeks before entering this study
* Active participation in any other clinical study
* Subjects with an active infection; sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or any other condition (i.e. myelodysplastic syndrome {MDS}, immune thrombocytopenic purpura {ITP}, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura {TTP}, hemolytic uremic syndrome {HUS}) that may have exacerbated thrombocytopenia
* History of unstable angina, CHF {NYHA \>class II}, uncontrolled hypertension {diastolic \>100mm HG}, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, or recent (within 1 year of screening) myocardial infarction (MI)
* History of arterial thrombosis (e.g., stroke or transient ischemic attack) within 1 year of screening
* History of pulmonary embolism or other venous thrombosis within 1 year of screening (except for catheter-related clots)
* Receipt of any experimental therapy within the last 4 weeks prior to screening; subject is currently enrolled in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational device or drug study (exception: PROVE study)
* Receipt of a bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell infusion (within 1 year of screening)
* Positive Pregnancy test
* breast feeding period
* Reproductive potential and not using adequate highly effective methods of contraceptive precautions in the judgment of the investigator during treatment and for 6 month (male or female) after the end of treatment (adequate: oral contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier method in conjunction with spermicidial jelly)
* Known hypersensitivity to any recombinant E. Coli-derived product or any additives
* Inability to comply with the protocol or missing written informed consent
* Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the subject before registration in the trial.
* Accommodation in an institution due to official or legal orders (§40 p.1 No. 4 AMG)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Adverse events of grade 3/4
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 4 (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia
timeFrame: on days 8, 11 or 12, 15
measure: Platelet Counts
timeFrame: on days 8, 11 or 12, 15
measure: Bleeding events
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Grade 1, 2, 3, or 4 thrombocytopenia (maximum NCI CTC grade by patient)
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Platelet transfusions
timeFrame: At the end of Cycle 8 (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Platelet counts
timeFrame: On day 22 of each Cycle till max. 8 Cycles (each cycle is 28 days)
measure: Counts of CT cycles
timeFrame: through study completion, an average of 8 month
measure: ADR/SADR of romiplostim
timeFrame: through study completion, an average of 8 month
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Praxisklinik für Krebsheilkunde für Frauen Drs. Kittel /Klare / Wetzel
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum Universitätsmedizin Berlin
city: Berlin
country: Germany
facility: Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau
city: Bonn
country: Germany
facility: Gynäkologisches Zentrum
city: Brandenburg
country: Germany
facility: Städtisches Klinikum Brandenburg
city: Braunschweig
country: Germany
facility: Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Lorenz, Hecker, Wesche
city: Chemnitz
country: Germany
facility: Klinikum Chemnitz GmbH
city: Dresden
country: Germany
facility: Universitätsklinik Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden
city: Jena
country: Germany
facility: Universitätsklinikum Jena
city: Kiel
country: Germany
facility: Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
city: Mainz
country: Germany
facility: Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
city: Saarbrücken
country: Germany
facility: Caritasklinik St. Theresia Saarbrücken
city: Tübingen
country: Germany
facility: Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Study officials:
affiliation: Frauenklinik
name: Jalid Sehouli, Prof. Dr. med.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: