Clinical trial NCT04099810: Assessment of Right Ventricular Volume in Pediatric Patients
Official title: Assessment of Right Ventricular Volume in Pediatric Patients - Is Apical or Subcostal Window More Accurate?
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Ventricular Function
Keywords: three-dimensional echocardiography
right ventricular volumes
cardiac magnetic resonance
Lead sponsor: Boston Children's Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-09-23
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Maximum age (years): 18
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: Most publication are basing RV volumes on images acquired from the apical window. However, some data have called the practice of basing these images on apical window into question. Moreover, despite our best efforts, we have been unable, in our laboratory to reliably visualize RV outflow from the apical view. Therefore, with an identified group of trained sonographers, we plan to conduct a head-to-head comparison of RV volumes acquired from these two windows (apical and subcostal), with comparison to gold-standard CMR.

Detailed description: The knowledge of right ventricular (RV) volumes is important from a clinical prospective. Traditionally, these volumes have been measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) because of its accuracy, reproducibility, and freedom from geometric assumptions. More and more, however, 3D echo has been used for assessment of ventricular volumes, first for left ventricle, now increasingly for RV. Most publication are basing RV volumes on images acquired from the apical window. However, some data have called the practice of basing these images on apical window into question. Moreover, despite our best efforts, we have been unable, in our laboratory to reliably visualize RV outflow from the apical view. An alternative view that can be used for RV 3D volume acquisition (first pioneered at BCH) is the subcostal view. Therefore, we plan to conduct a head-to-head comparison of RV volumes acquired from these two windows (apical and subcostal), with comparison to gold-standard CMR.

Hypothesis: RVEDV measured by the subcostal window is more accurate than RV volume measured in the apical window in a cohort of pediatric patients.

Analytic plan: Echocardiograms will be performed on the same day as the CMR, and will be performed by a group of sonographers trained in 3D volume acquisition. Descriptive statistics will include mean and median absolute % error and coefficients of variation. A paired t-test will be used to compare raw differences in %error for apical vs. subcostal window measurements. If the %error is highly skewed, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used or the %error values will be log-transformed before application of the paired t-test (if no zero %error values exist). Linear regression will be used to estimate the window-differences in %error or log(%error) controlling for age and/or sedation status. Assessments of feasibility for both windows will be performed as described by Renella et al; and reproducibility of measurements made with echo vs. CMR will be also be graphically assessed using Bland-Altman plots of the raw measurements for data derived from each window. As a secondary (stratified) analysis, we anticipate dividing the cohort into 2 groups of 25 patients each (25 \< 10y; 25 \> 10y). Patients under 10y will typically be under anesthesia. Exploratory analyses will investigate subgroup differences defined by demographic/ surgical variables with respect to the magnitude of the difference between the 2 techniques. Of note the analyses performed above will also be performed for LV (in addition to RV) as a secondary analysis (with comparison of LV-specific vs. non-LV specific software, as appropriate).

Sample size/Power: funding is provided for 50 patients and this will be our target sample size. The analysis will be paired, to compare the %error (echo relative to MRI) measurements from apical vs. subcostal windows). To detect a 0.5 SD difference in apical vs. subcostal windows %error with 85% power, 38 subjects with echo \& MRI are required. If the comparisons are performed stratified by age (25 subjects per age group), there is 80% power to detect a 0.58 SD difference in apical vs. subcostal windows %error.

Limitations: CMR, while considered a gold-standard, has a certain amount of intrinsic variability in volume measurement. Moreover, a statistically significant difference may not necessary be a clinically important difference. Patients will not have echo and CMR performed at the exact same time.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients\<18y scheduled to undergo CMR for clinical reasons.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients \>18y

Primary outcomes:
measure: Mean absolute %error in end diastolic volume measurements
timeFrame: 0 days
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Mean absolute %error in right ventricular end systolic volume (RVESV) / right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF)
timeFrame: 0 days
measure: Mean absolute %error in RVEDV/RVESV/RVEF (subcostal window)
timeFrame: 0 days
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Boston Children's Hospital
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Boston Children's Hospital
name: David M Harrild, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kutty S, Zhou J, Gauvreau K, Trincado C, Powell AJ, Geva T. Regional dysfunction of the right ventricular outflow tract reduces the accuracy of Doppler tissue imaging assessment of global right ventricular systolic function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jun;24(6):637-43. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.020. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
citation: Geva T. Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Jan 20;13(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-9.
citation: Williams RG, Pearson GD, Barst RJ, Child JS, del Nido P, Gersony WM, Kuehl KS, Landzberg MJ, Myerson M, Neish SR, Sahn DJ, Verstappen A, Warnes CA, Webb CL; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on research in adult congenital heart disease. Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on research in adult congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.074. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
citation: Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, Meijboom FJ, van Dijk AP, Spijkerboer AM, Bouma BJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Mulder BJ. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):545-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.659664. Epub 2007 Jul 9.
citation: Knauth AL, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, Landzberg MJ, Walsh EP, Lock JE, del Nido PJ, Geva T. Ventricular size and function assessed by cardiac MRI predict major adverse clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Heart. 2008 Feb;94(2):211-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.104745. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
citation: Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, Manning WJ, Pohost GM, Rademakers FE, van Rossum AC, Shaw LJ, Yucel EK; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004 Nov;25(21):1940-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040. No abstract available.
citation: Kochav J, Simprini L, Weinsaft JW. Imaging of the right heart--CT and CMR. Echocardiography. 2015 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S53-68. doi: 10.1111/echo.12212. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
citation: Monaghan MJ. Role of real time 3D echocardiography in evaluating the left ventricle. Heart. 2006 Jan;92(1):131-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.058388. No abstract available.
citation: Aune E, Baekkevar M, Rodevand O, Otterstad JE. Reference values for left ventricular volumes with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2010 Feb;44(1):24-30. doi: 10.3109/14017430903114446.
citation: Chahal NS, Lim TK, Jain P, Chambers JC, Kooner JS, Senior R. Population-based reference values for 3D echocardiographic LV volumes and ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;5(12):1191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.07.014.
citation: Muraru D, Badano LP, Peluso D, Dal Bianco L, Casablanca S, Kocabay G, Zoppellaro G, Iliceto S. Comprehensive analysis of left ventricular geometry and function by three-dimensional echocardiography in healthy adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Jun;26(6):618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
citation: Medvedofsky D, Addetia K, Patel AR, Sedlmeier A, Baumann R, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM. Novel Approach to Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes and Function from Focused Views. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1222-31. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
citation: Ostenfeld E, Flachskampf FA. Assessment of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography: from geometric approximations to realistic shapes. Echo Res Pract. 2015 Mar 1;2(1):R1-R11. doi: 10.1530/ERP-14-0077. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
citation: Laser KT, Karabiyik A, Korperich H, Horst JP, Barth P, Kececioglu D, Burchert W, DallaPozza R, Herberg U. Validation and Reference Values for Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Right Ventricular Volumetry in Children: A Multicenter Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Sep;31(9):1050-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
citation: Renella P, Marx GR, Zhou J, Gauvreau K, Geva T. Feasibility and reproducibility of three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular size and function in pediatric patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):903-10. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 14.