Clinical trial NCT02194062: Comparison of Nasal Steroids After FESS in CRSwNP
Official title: A Comparison of Budesonide Nasal Irrigation in Different Head Positions and Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Post-operative Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Sinusitis
Nasal Polyps
Keywords: Chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps
Nasal steroids
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery
SNOT-22
Lund-Kennedy
Lead sponsor: Yale University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2014-07-18
Enrollment: 32
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to compare intranasal fluticasone spray with budesonide nasal saline rinses in both the upright and head forward positions in patients who have had functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and measure differences in Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores and Lund- Kennedy scores on rigid nasal endoscopy at time points 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months post-op.

Detailed description: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition of the lining of the nose and sinuses that lasts 12 weeks or longer with objective evidence of mucosal inflammation (1). CRSwNP is characterized by the presence of bilateral nasal polyps in the middle meatus. Patients with CRSwNP for whom medical therapy has failed, often have functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Nasal steroids are important post-operatively to prevent polyps from recurring. Many studies have shown that nasal steroids are superior to placebo in maintaining improvement in symptom scores, such as SNOT-22, post-operatively by preventing polyps from returning (2). Nasal steroids can reduce inflammation locally and can prevent disease relapse without the systemic effects of oral steroids. However, there is no consensus as to which nasal steroid and which delivery method is most effective in treating these patients. Traditional nasal sprays, such as fluticasone spray, may not deliver the medication widely in the nasal cavity. Budesonide is available in a respule form that can be used to instill the medication in the nose. In an attempt to more effectively deliver the medication, changes in patient's head position has been prescribed to achieve better delivery (3). The safety of intranasal budesonide, a more potent steroid than fluticasone, has been established (4, 5). However, any improved efficacy over fluticasone nasal spray remains anecdotal as head to head comparisons have not previously been performed.

Practice patterns among rhinologists in the post-operative prescription of nasal steroids vary widely. Determining which medication/delivery method is more effective will help rhinologists better treat their patients and prevent symptoms, for which the surgery was performed, from returning.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients who have had FESS for CRSwNP within the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who are under the age of 18
2. Concurrent oral corticosteroid use of the equivalent of greater than 10 mg of prednisone use per day
3. The use of medications that accelerate the clearance of systemic cortisol (Dilantin, rifampin, amphetamines, and lithium)
4. The use of medications that inhibit the clearance of systemic cortisol (ketoconazole, amphotericin B, bupropion, fluoroquinolones)
5. Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids
6. A personal history of Wegener's Granulomatosis or other autoimmune disease with nasal manifestations

Primary outcomes:
measure: SNOT-22 Scores
timeFrame: 6 months post-op.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Lund-Kennedy Scoring for Nasal Endoscopy
timeFrame: 6 months post-op
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: New Haven
country: United States
facility: Yale Physicians Bldg
state: Connecticut
city: Stratford
country: United States
facility: Yale ENT Stratford
state: Connecticut
Study officials:
affiliation: Yale University School of Medicine, Asst Professor
name: R. Peter Manes, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P, Georgalas C, Goossens H, Harvey R, Hellings P, Hopkins C, Jones N, Joos G, Kalogjera L, Kern B, Kowalski M, Price D, Riechelmann H, Schlosser R, Senior B, Thomas M, Toskala E, Voegels R, Wang de Y, Wormald PJ. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012 Mar;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.4193/Rhino12.000.
citation: Snidvongs K, Kalish L, Sacks R, Sivasubramaniam R, Cope D, Harvey RJ. Sinus surgery and delivery method influence the effectiveness of topical corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):221-33. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3880.
citation: Beule A, Athanasiadis T, Athanasiadis E, Field J, Wormald PJ. Efficacy of different techniques of sinonasal irrigation after modified Lothrop procedure. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):85-90. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3265.
citation: Bhalla RK, Payton K, Wright ED. Safety of budesonide in saline sinonasal irrigations in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: lack of significant adrenal suppression. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Dec;37(6):821-5.
citation: Sachanandani NS, Piccirillo JF, Kramper MA, Thawley SE, Vlahiotis A. The effect of nasally administered budesonide respules on adrenal cortex function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Mar;135(3):303-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2008.555.
citation: Neubauer PD, Schwam ZG, Manes RP. Comparison of intranasal fluticasone spray, budesonide atomizer, and budesonide respules in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis after endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Mar;6(3):233-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21688. Epub 2015 Dec 17.