Clinical trial NCT04029714: Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Trigger Trial (PCASTT-UK): Comparing Current Practice for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance (AS) to an AS Protocol With Standardised Triggers for Transitioning to Curative Treatment
Official title: A Multicentre Randomised Active Surveillance (AS) Trial of Current Practice Versus Standardised Triggers for Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Prostate Cancer
Keywords: Prostate Cancer
Active Surveillance
MRI
standardised treatment triggers
randomized
Lead sponsor: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: King's College London
name: Uppsala University
First posted: 2019-07-23
Enrollment: 195
Sex: MALE
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: A large proportion of men with prostate cancer are overdiagnosed and overtreated mainly due to PSA testing. Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce these harms by recommending curative treatment only when and if signs of tumour progression occur. There are however a number of uncertainties in AS, the most important being when to initiate treatment.

Therefore, the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group (SPCG) are running a large multi-centre randomised control trial (RCT) to test the safety of a standardized active surveillance protocol with specific triggers for repeat biopsies and initiation of curative treatment, compared to the current practice for active surveillance. They are recruiting in multiple sites in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. The primary aim is to reduce overtreatment and subsequent side effects, without increasing the risk of disease progression or prostate cancer mortality.

In the UK, there is also no set criteria for when to re-biopsy and/or initiate curative treatment for patients on AS and tends to be at the clinician's discretion. Thus, PCASTT-UK has been established to run as a parallel RCT and add to the findings from SPCG-17.

Detailed description: STUDY HYPOTHESIS The aim of this trial is to test the safety of an Active Surveillance protocol comparing current practice to standardized triggers for initiation of curative treatment, based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging or biopsy pathology. The study hypothesis is that standardized triggers will reduce overtreatment without increasing disease progression and prostate cancer mortality.

STUDY DESIGN Randomized multi-centre open-label clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS Patients within 12 months of a diagnosis of prostate cancer will be approached and consented to the study. Computerised randomisation (1:1) will assign participants to either the control (Arm 1) or intervention arm (Arm 2). In the control arm, patients will be treated according to active surveillance protocol at the trial centre; in the intervention arm patients will follow standardised active surveillance protocol applying specific criteria for repeat biopsies and the initiation of curative treatment. Patients are stratified by centre and Gleason score.

FOLLOW UP In both arms, patients will followed up for 10 years with the following schedule: a PSA test every 6 months, clinical examination (with PSA test) and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire annually, and MRI every second year. Re-biopsy and/or initiation of curative treatment depends on the trial arm patients are randomised to.

Repeat biopsies

Arm 1 (control arm): according to current practice (urologists' judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

* A systematic repeat biopsy if PSA density increases to \> 0.2 ng/ml/cc, and then at every 0.1 ng/ml/cc increase
* MRI progression in men with previously only Gleason grade 3+3: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, increase in PI-RADS score to 3-5, a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
* MRI progression in men with Gleason grade 3+4: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, or a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5

Curative treatment

Arm 1 (control arm): According to current practice (urologists judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

* MRI progression in lesions with confirmed Gleason grade 4: increase in PI-RADS score to 4 or 5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
* Pathological progression: Gleason pattern 5, primary Gleason pattern 4 in any core with 5 mm or more cancer, Gleason 3+4 in 3 or more cores or 30% if more than 10 cores are taken, or Gleason 3+4 in 10 mm or more cancer

Patients will remain on trial unless they end Active Surveillance due to initiation of treatment, development of metastases, transition to watchful waiting, or death of any cause. After the initiation of curative treatment, watchful waiting, or palliative treatment for cancer progression, the patient is treated according to the standard protocol of the participating centre.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Recently (within 12 months) diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Tumour stage ≤ T2a, NX, M0 (former MX)
* PSA \<15ng/ml, PSA density ≤ 0.2 ng/ml/cm3
* Gleason pattern 3+3=6 (any number of cores, any cancer involvement) or Gleason pattern 3+4=7 (\<3 cores (or ≤30 % of cores if more than ten cores), \<10 mm cancer in one core)
* Life expectancy \>10 years with no upper age limit\*
* Candidate for curative treatment if progression occurs
* Signed written informed consent.

  * There is no upper age limit; however the estimated remaining lifetime for the patient should be more than ten years. The potential life expectancy of the participants should be estimated based on age, co-morbidity and risk factors for death, such as frailty and smoking.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Not eligible for AS according to above criteria
* Not competent in spoken or written English

Primary outcomes:
measure: Progression-free survival
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Cumulative incidence of pT3 at radical prostatectomy specimens
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
measure: Cumulative incidence of metastases
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
measure: Cumulative number of treatments with curative intent (mainly radical prostatectomies or local radiotherapy)
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
measure: Cumulative incidence of switch to watchful waiting
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
measure: Quality of life assessed by EPIC-26 score, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, self-reported quality of life: questionnaires
timeFrame: Median 10 years follow-up
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Bedford
country: United Kingdom
facility: Bedford Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Epsom & St. Helier
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Guy's Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Queen Elizabeth Hospital
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Royal Mardsen Hospital
Study officials:
References: