Clinical trial NCT05518682: Assessment of Bimodal Stimulation Device Compliance and Satisfaction in Individuals With Tinnitus
Official title: Assessment of Bimodal Stimulation Device Compliance and Satisfaction in Individuals With Tinnitus
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Tinnitus
Lead sponsor: University of Minnesota
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Neuromod Devices Limited
name: Kent Taylor
First posted: 2022-08-26
Enrollment: 26
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: One arm with the same device protocol, except that there are two subgroups with different hearing/audiogram profiles.
Primary purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Brief summary: The research objective of the proposed usability study is to assess the compliance and acceptance/satisfaction of using a bimodal stimulation device with the ability to self-adjust the sound stimulus presented to the ears via headphones. In particular, the CE marked bimodal stimulation portable device, Lenire, which is developed by Neuromod Devices Limited (Dublin, Ireland) to alleviate the symptoms of chronic subjective tinnitus, is currently configured according to a tinnitus person's audiogram (i.e., hearing threshold profile for different sound frequencies) during fitting in a hearing center. Lenire device is a non-invasive stimulation device that consists of a controller that connects to headphones for sound delivery to the ears and connects to a mouth component that provides gentle electrical stimulation to the tongue surface. Individuals are recommended to use the device for 60 minutes daily (two 30-minute sessions consecutively or at different times of the day) for at least 10 weeks. Lenire is already commercialized across Europe and available by audiologists or hearing technicians in numerous hearing centers for treating tinnitus. It has also been evaluated in two large-scale clinical trials in over 500 tinnitus participants, demonstrating tinnitus benefit and minimal risk with high compliance and satisfaction rates.

The primary objective of the proposed usability study is to first assess compliance and satisfaction with the Lenire device that does not require an audiogram for fitting and that can be implemented mostly through virtual visits (except for the first visit). These modifications to the Lenire fitting process will reduce the time and personnel effort required for its implementation, enabling a broader patient population to access bimodal stimulation for tinnitus treatment, including military personnel and those who are not nearby hearing centers for in-person sessions. High compliance and satisfaction rates from this small proof-of concept usability study will then justify and guide a larger clinical study to assess efficacy and performance of this newly implemented Lenire device process.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 18 years and over at time of consent
* Ability to read and understand English
* Willing and able to provide and understand informed consent
* Willing to commit to the full duration of the investigation
* Subjective tinnitus
* Tinnitus duration of greater than or equal to 3 months and less than or equal to 20 years at time of consent
* Baseline THI score from 38 to 76
* Hearing loss condition (low hearing loss group (n=10) and high hearing loss group (n=10))
* Access to reliable internet connection and device to complete virtual video visits and electronic surveys

Exclusion Criteria:

* Subjective tinnitus, where pulsatility is the dominant feature
* Objective tinnitus
* Middle ear pathology in either ear including documented/known conductive hearing loss \>= 20 dB at three adjacent frequencies or if a diagnosis of a tympanic membrane perforation or other middle ear pathology has been rendered, if there is an indwelling pressure equalization tube by patient report, or if middle ear surgery has been performed
* Began wearing hearing aids within the past 3 months
* Health care provider has rendered a diagnosis of Meniere's disease or other disorder with fluctuating hearing loss
* A diagnosis of hyperacusis, misophonia or hypersensitivity to loud noises has been rendered
* History of auditory hallucinations
* Tumor on the hearing or balance nervous systems
* Hospitalization, or visit to a physician, for a head or neck injury, including whiplash, in the previous 12 months
* Initiated new prescription medications or medical treatments in the previous 3 months that may impact the outcomes of the investigation, based on class of medication: antidepressants, anticonvulsants, neuroleptics and opioid analgesics. See Appendix 2 for list of medical treatments.
* Ceased prescription medications or medical treatments in the previous 3 months that may impact the outcomes of the investigation, based on class of medication: antidepressants, anticonvulsants, neuroleptics and opioid analgesics. See Appendix 2 for list of medical treatments.
* Changed dosage of prescription medications in the previous 3 months that may impact the outcomes of the investigation, based on class of medication: antidepressants, anticonvulsants, neuroleptics and opioid analgesics. See Appendix 2 for list of medical treatments.
* Any use of benzodiazepines or sedative hypnotics (either regularly or on demand)
* Neurological condition that may lead to seizures or loss of consciousness (e.g., epilepsy)
* Participant with a pacemaker or other electro-active implanted device
* Participant previously diagnosed with psychosis or schizophrenia
* Participants diagnosed with Burning Mouth Syndrome
* A diagnosis of bothersome temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJ) has been rendered
* Previous involvement in a clinical investigation for tinnitus treatment or had an implantable or surgical intervention for tinnitus
* Inability to physically or comprehensively use the device
* Oral piercings that cannot or will not be removed
* Current or previous involvement in medico-legal cases
* Pregnancy per patient report
* Prisoner
* PI does not deem the candidate to be suitable for the investigation for other reasons not listed above. Rationale must be provided.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Compliance rate after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Satisfaction rate after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation)
Other outcomes:
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on tinnitus symptoms after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation) and 12 week follow-up visit
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on tinnitus symptoms after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation) and 12 week follow-up visit
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on tinnitus symptoms after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation) and 12 week follow-up visit
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on health after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation)
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on stress after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation)
measure: Impact of the stimulation device on anxiety after 12 weeks of bimodal stimulation
timeFrame: Enrollment visit to week 12 visit (end of device stimulation)
Locations:
city: Minneapolis
country: United States
facility: University of Minnesota - TESSLab/PWB
state: Minnesota
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Minnesota
name: Meredith Adams, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Minnesota
name: Peggy Nelson, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: