Clinical trial NCT03480282: Discussing Stopping Cancer Screening and Prognosis With Older Adults
Official title: Discussing Stopping Cancer Screening and Prognosis With Older Adults
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Cancer Screening
Keywords: Life expectancy
Older adults
Primary care
Cancer screening
Lead sponsor: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First posted: 2018-03-29
Enrollment: 90
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 76
Maximum age (years): 89
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: Guidelines recommend not screening adults with \<10-year life expectancy for cancer; however, primary care physicians feel uncomfortable talking to older adults about prognosis. The investigators aim to determine whether providing PCPs with scripts on patient prognosis and older adults with information on their prognosis would be useful when recommending stopping cancer screening.

Detailed description: The American Cancer Society and the American Board of Internal Medicine Choosing Wisely Campaign recommend clinicians not screen older adults who have \<10 year life expectancy for breast (specific to women) or colorectal cancer (CRC). This is because these patients have little chance of experiencing the life prolonging benefits of cancer screening and instead may only experience harm from being screened. The most concerning harm of cancer screening is overdiagnosis - the diagnosis and treatment of cancers that otherwise would not have caused problems in an older adult's lifetime. Despite this, around half of adults \>75 years with \<10 year life expectancy are regularly screened for cancer. One reason for the overuse of these tests is that PCPs feel uncomfortable discussing stopping screening with older adults since it requires estimating and discussing patient prognosis. Some PCPs admit to recommending cancer screening to older adults with short life expectancy simply to avoid talking to patients about prognosis. However, by avoiding these discussions, PCPs may be impeding older adults' ability to make informed decisions about their care and may be putting patients at risk of the harms of cancer screening without any chance of benefit. Therefore, the investigators aim to interview PCPs and older adults about their thoughts and feelings on how PCPs may discuss older adults' prognosis in the context of talking about stopping cancer screening. Based on those findings, the investigators will develop strategies for PCPs to use to approach these discussions and will draft scripts to suggest language for PCPs to use when communicating about prognosis when recommending stopping cancer screening. Then, the investigators will study if providing PCPs with these scripts and information about their patients' prognosis is useful. Specifically, the investigators will provide 45 PCPs with information about their patients' prognosis and the example scripts before a clinic visit for up to 5 of their patients. The investigators aim to recruit 90 patients with approximately 5-10 year life expectancy. The investigators will interview PCPs and older adults after these visits to learn how and/or if the prognostic information and the scripts were used. These data are essential for improving the quality of PCP discussions around stopping cancer screening and will ultimately improve the care of older adults.

Specific Aims:

1. To learn from PCPs and older adults about how to discuss patient prognosis when recommending stopping cancer screening and to develop strategies for having these discussions.
2. To study whether providing information on patient prognosis and scripts for discussing patient prognosis when recommending stopping cancer screening are useful to PCPs and older adults.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* English-speaking
* Aged 76 to 89 years
* Scheduled for a routine visit or physical with their PCP in the next 3-12 weeks
* Patient aged 76-79 must have a least one Charlson Comorbidity
* Patient must have undergone CRC screening within the last 10 years
* Women only: patient must have undergone mammography screening within the last 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

* older adults with dementia
* older adults with a history of colon cancer
* older adults whose last colonoscopy was read as abnormal
* older women who have a history of breast cancer
* older adults whose PCP has already had 5 patients participate in the study
* older women whose last mammogram was read as abnormal

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Intentions to be Screened for Colorectal Cancer.
timeFrame: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
state: Massachusetts
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: BIDMC Affiliated Physicians Group
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
name: Mara A Schonberg, MD, MPH
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Schonberg MA, Karamourtopoulos M, Jacobson AR, Aliberti GM, Pinheiro A, Smith AK, Davis RB, Schuttner LC, Hamel MB. A Strategy to Prepare Primary Care Clinicians for Discussing Stopping Cancer Screening With Adults Older Than 75 Years. Innov Aging. 2020 Jul 7;4(4):igaa027. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa027. eCollection 2020.