Clinical trial NCT06160882: Powered Prosthesis for Use With TF Osseointegration Recipients
Official title: Evaluation of Powered Prosthesis for Use With Transfemoral Osseointegration Recipients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Amputation
Keywords: Transfemoral Amputation
Lead sponsor: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Northwestern University
name: Northwestern Memorial Hospital
First posted: 2023-12-07
Enrollment: 6
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: The primary endpoint will be to evaluate the functional, biomechanical, metabolic outcomes, and user satisfaction while using a powered prosthesis suspended by an OI interface compared to their prescribed traditional socket

The secondary endpoint will be to determine changes in EMG signal quality and neural information resulting from OI and TMR as compared to an instrumented socket for control of a powered leg prosthesis.
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional mobility, control, and user satisfaction from persons who have an amputation above the knee and have received osseo-integration (OI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery, while walking with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis.

Detailed description: The objective of this study is to evaluate functional mobility, non-weight-bearing neural control, and user satisfaction from individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation who have received osseo-integration (OI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), while ambulating with a fully powered prosthesis.

The hypothesis is that OI will show perceived benefits for participants including: 1) lower perceived weight of the prosthesis due to the more secure OI interface over a traditional socket, 2) decreased energy expenditure during ambulation and transitions, and 3) electromyographic (EMG) signals will be higher quality and more robust than signals measured from within a socket, potentially allowing for improved pattern recognition driven prostheses in future device design and studies.

Prior to surgical intervention, amputee participants will visit the lab up to 3 times for socket fitting, and at most 7 times to practice using the powered prosthesis and collect experimental data. There is no time limitation between sessions and each session will last a maximum of 4 hours.

Aim 1: Pre-Surgery Fitting and Powered Leg Prosthesis Training:

Participants will be fit for a custom instrumented socket that allows for collection of surface EMG signals and for use with the powered lower limb prosthesis. The socket that is fabricated is solely for the purpose of this study, will be used only in the research lab. The participant will continue to use their clinically prescribed socket and prosthesis when not attending study visits. EMG control sites over the semitendinosus, biceps femoris, tensor fasciae latae, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and adductor magnus will be located using clinical best practices. Once socket fit is completed, the prosthetist will attach and align the powered prosthesis. The participant will be instructed to walk with the powered prosthesis for level ground walking, incline walking, stair climbing and non-weight bearing independence control activities. The walkway, ramps and stairs are equipped with handrails and the amputee with be wearing either an overhead harness or gait belt for safety. Additionally, a non-weight bearing independent control system will be configured. The participant will be instructed to attempt to move their 'phantom' limb through knee flexion/extension and ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion range movements while EMG data are collected. These data are used to train a pattern recognition control system which can control the leg knee and ankle joints respectively, either in a virtual environment or with the physical prosthesis. The participants will then complete functional, biomechanical, metabolic, and qualitative patient reported outcome measures using the instrumented socket and the powered leg prosthesis. The investigator will use an extensive list of standard clinical assessments and participant-reported measures that assess physical function, mobility, balance, fall risk, quality of life, and metabolic expenditure.

OI TMR surgery 1 and recovery: participants will undergo the first osseointegration (OI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery at Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

OI surgery 2 and recovery: Participants will undergo the second OI surgery where the abutment will be connected to the fixture with in the femur. The participant will again be monitored for full recovery (typically 4-6 weeks). No outcome measures or assessments will be performed prior to 12 weeks' post-surgery

Aim 2: Post-Surgery Fitting and Powered Leg Prosthesis Training:

After osseointegration and TMR surgery and recovery, the study participant no longer requires a standard prosthetic socket. EMG signals can now be measured using a custom fit electrode band on the residual limb that is tethered to the prosthesis. Participants will be fit with the powered prosthesis using their OI interface and trained on its use. Participants will receive instruction on use of the powered prosthesis, now attached via their OI interface with the electrode band. The participants will walk under the supervision of a clinician while device parameters are configured as prior to OI/TMR surgery. The participant will progress to walking over slopes, perform stairclimbing with a reciprocal gait and sit to and from standing transitions. The clinician will provide verbal instruction and cues on how to best make use of the power and how to safely perform all activities. The investigators will repeat the same measures as previously performed to evaluate the functional, metabolic, and biomechanical benefits conferred by OI over a traditional socket when using a powered leg device. At the end of each visit, the study participant will return to their clinically prescribed prosthesis.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Unilateral lower limb amputation at the transfemoral level
* Existing prosthesis wearer
* K2/K3/K4 level ambulation
* 18-70 years old
* Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score greater than 17
* Ability to demonstrate proper safety with passive prosthesis
* Candidate for a myoelectric prosthesis (can generate mV level electromyographic EMG signals as detected by surface electrodes
* Candidate for OI surgery as verified by surgical team or has previously received OI
* Candidate for TMR surgery as verified by surgical team or has previously received TMR

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to successfully receive osseointegration and TMR
* Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: Ability to consistently wear prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to properly evaluate the relative benefits of the intervention
* Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data.
* Visually impaired
* Proximal nerve injury that prevents TMR
* Individuals who smoke: may interfere with OI process from both bone healing and soft tissue standpoints
* Individuals with active implants.
* Significant comorbidity that would preclude completion of the study, use of prostheses, or would otherwise prevent data acquisition by researchers

Primary outcomes:
measure: Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPPRO)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPPRO)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Timed Up and Go (TUG)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Timed Up and Go (TUG)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Single Leg Stance Test (SLS)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Single Leg Stance Test (SLS)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Four Square Step Test (FSST)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Four Square Step Test (FSST)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
measure: Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS)
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS)
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Determine changes in EMG signal quality and neural information resulting from OI and TMR as compared to an instrumented socket for control of a powered leg prosthesis.
timeFrame: Completion of Aim 1:approximately 10-12 weeks (10 in lab visits) from enrollment
measure: Determine changes in EMG signal quality and neural information resulting from OI and TMR as compared to an instrumented socket for control of a powered leg prosthesis.
timeFrame: Completion of study, an average of 1 year from enrollment
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chicago
country: United States
facility: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
state: Illinois
Study officials:
affiliation: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
name: Levi Hargrove, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: