Clinical trial NCT04705181: The Indications of First Molar Extraction at Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine
Official title: The Indications of First Molar Extraction at Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine--A 14-year Retrospective Study
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Conditions: Tooth Extraction
Lead sponsor: Tufts University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-01-12
Enrollment: 240
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients who had fully-erupted first molar extraction (tooth number #3 or #14 or #19 or #30) under CDT code of D7140 (Extraction, erupted tooth or exposed root) and D7210 (Extraction, erupted tooth requiring removal of bone and/or sectioning of tooth, and including elevation of mucoperiosteal flap if indicated) at TUSDM

Brief summary: The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there has been a change of criteria for tooth extraction at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome is the change of mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth. The secondary outcomes are changes of other parameters (periodontal, endodontic and restorative) of extracted teeth and reasons for extraction.

Detailed description: The purpose of the present study is to quantitatively evaluate the change in tooth extraction at school setting over the past 14 years.

Aims The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there has been a change of criteria for tooth extraction at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome is the change of mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth. The secondary outcomes are changes of other parameters (periodontal, endodontic and restorative) of extracted teeth and reasons for extraction.

Hypothesis Criteria for extraction of first molar teeth has changed between 2005 and 2018 toward early extraction of teeth with less severe periodontal and other conditions.

Significance Currently, there is not study presenting the quantified data for criteria change for tooth extraction. Also, determining whether to extract a tooth or not actually requires taking several clinical parameters into consideration. The present study will give clinicians a broad review of the change in clinical decision making for tooth extraction.

Materials and Methods Retrospective chart review among patients in TUSDM Pre-doctoral and Post-doctoral Group Practices The study setting is among patients who received dental treatments at TUSDM. The database will be retrospectively reviewed by patients' electronic records in TUSDM Postgraduate (PG) and Undergraduate (UG) clinics from 01/01/2005 till 12/31/2018.

Eligibility criteria: Part 1:

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who had fully-erupted first molar extraction (tooth number #3 or #14 or #19 or #30) under Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature (CDT) code of D7140 (Extraction, erupted tooth or exposed root) and D7210 (Extraction, erupted tooth requiring removal of bone and/or sectioning of tooth, and including elevation of mucoperiosteal flap if indicated) at TUSDM.
2. The electronic records must include the following data:

   * Gender
   * Age
   * Comprehensive periodontal chart, including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement and mobility. The periodontal chart has to be recorded within 12 months before tooth extraction
   * Periapical radiograph and bite-wing radiographs of extracted tooth. The radiographs have to be taken within 12 months before tooth extraction
   * Reasons for tooth extraction

Part 2:

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who had:

   * Fully-erupted first and second molars (tooth number #2, #3, #14, #15, #18, #19, #30, #31) that were extracted under CDT codes D7140 (Extraction, erupted tooth or exposed root) or D7210 (Extraction, erupted tooth requiring removal of bone and/or sectioning of tooth, and including elevation of mucoperiosteal flap if indicated).
   * The same extracted tooth were replace with dental implant placement under CDT code D6010 (Surgical placement, endosteal implant) within 24 months after extraction.
2. The electronic records must include the following data

   * Sex
   * Age
   * Dental records including:

     * Periapical radiograph of the tooth before extraction: the radiographs have to be taken within 12 months before tooth extraction, including one or more of probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement and tooth mobility.

Exclusion Criteria (both parts):

1. Absence of tooth distal to extracted tooth.

   a. Clinical decision for tooth extraction may be affected by tooth location. When the tooth is the distal abutment in the dentition, clinicians tend to keep the tooth even if the prognosis is compromised.
2. Presence of dental implant adjacent to extracted tooth a. Clinical decision for tooth extraction may be affected by adjacent dental implants.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Part 1: Change in mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth
timeFrame: 2005-2018
measure: Part 2: Change of criteria for tooth extraction
timeFrame: 2007-2018
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
name: Bjorn Steffensen, DDS, MS, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: