Clinical trial NCT03992820: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Local Anaesthesia
Official title: The Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Local Anaesthetic Cream in Alleviating the Pain of Local Anaesthetic Injections in Adults - A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Donor Site Complication
Skin Graft
Keywords: TENS
local anaesthetic cream
skin graft donor site
Lead sponsor: University Hospitals, Leicester
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2019-06-20
Enrollment: 8
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 90
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Brief summary: TENS-LA trial is a randomised control trial to assess the possible efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on eliminating or reducing the pain of local anaesthetic injection for minor surgical procedures. Comparison is done with a mixture of local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) which is used at times for the same purpose. Though local procedures are carried out in various parts of the body, this trial will be conducted specifically on patients undergoing a split skin graft harvest from the thigh. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria and are willing to participate will be randomised to receive either TENS or EMLA.

Results will be analysed based on the pain score records at the end of the trial

Detailed description: Patients undergoing a split skin graft harvest will be selected from theatre lists and will be given complete information regarding the nature of trial, possible complications, risks and advantages by sending them a Patient Information Sheet at least a week prior to the procedure when they are send an appointment. On the day of procedure, either the Chief Investigator or one of the other two Investigators will see the patient in the Theatre Arrivals Area and have a full discussion on the details of the trial and will answer all their questions. Patients willing to take part and are within the inclusion criteria and does not have any of the exclusion criteria will be randomised to either the study group or the control group after obtaining informed consent.

The trial group will have the TENS to the area planned for injection for 30 minutes before injection of the local anaesthetic (a combination of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 1% lignocaine with 1/200,000 adrenaline). The control group will have EMLA applied on the site planned for local anaesthetic injection and after 1 hour , will be removed and immediately injected with the same anaesthetic solution (this is already a procedure practised by some of the surgeons).

Pain perception will be evaluated using two Numeric Pain Rating Scales in the study and control groups- one to assess the pain of needle penetration and the second to assess the pain of local infiltration. The Numeric pain scale is filled in by the doctor as indicated by the patient. Pulse rate and Blood Pressure monitoring will be carried out as an objective measurement of response to pain (these are routinely recorded when patient is in the theater for a procedure). Patient involvement in the study ends at this point.

Analysis of the outcome will be done at the end of the trial period.

Eligibility criteria: Both interventions will be carried out in adult patients. For the purpose of standardisation and avoiding the variations from different sites in the body, and different surgical procedures, the site will be the thigh in both groups which is the donor site for a split skin graft.

Inclusion criteria:

• Adult patients aged 18 to 90 years undergoing a split skin graft harvest under local anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria:

* Patients below 18 and above 90 years of age
* Patients with dementia or other mental abnormalities causing incapacity.
* Pregnant ladies
* Patients with pace maker or ICD
* Patients with history of epilepsy or aneurysm
* Patients with undiagnosed skin or pain conditions

Primary outcomes:
measure: The primary outcome is pain of local anaesthetic injection after application of TENS or LA cream as measured by two Numeric Pain Rating Scale
timeFrame: 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Changes in blood pressure in response to injection of local anaesthetic
timeFrame: 10 minutes
measure: Changes in heart rate in response to injection of local anaesthetic
timeFrame: 10 minutes
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Leicester
country: United Kingdom
facility: University Hospitals of Leicester
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospitals, Leicester
name: Rajshree Jayarajan
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kasat V, Gupta A, Ladda R, Kathariya M, Saluja H, Farooqui AA. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in dentistry- A review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Dec 1;6(5):e562-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.51586. eCollection 2014 Dec.
citation: Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
citation: Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
citation: Sluka KA, Deacon M, Stibal A, Strissel S, Terpstra A. Spinal blockade of opioid receptors prevents the analgesia produced by TENS in arthritic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 May;289(2):840-6.
citation: Kalra A, Urban MO, Sluka KA. Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Jul;298(1):257-63.
citation: Wall PD, Sweet WH. Temporary abolition of pain in man. Science. 1967 Jan 6;155(3758):108-9. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3758.108.
citation: Sluka KA, Bjordal JM, Marchand S, Rakel BA. What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature. Phys Ther. 2013 Oct;93(10):1397-402. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120281. Epub 2013 May 2.
citation: Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Ljunggreen AE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00098-8.
citation: Varadharaja M, Udhya J, Srinivasan I, Sivakumar JS, Karthik RS, Manivanan M. Comparative clinical evaluation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator over conventional local anesthesia in children seeking dental procedures: A clinical study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S113-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137407.
citation: teDuits E, Goepferd S, Donly K, Pinkham J, Jakobsen J. The effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia in children. Pediatr Dent. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):191-6.
citation: 11. Choudhari SR, Parikrama SJ, Gaurav VK et al. Efficacy of transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation in alleviating pain during inferior alveolar nerve block injections in pediatric dentistry. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation. 2017;2(2): 69-72
citation: Meechan JG, Gowans AJ, Welbury RR. The use of patient-controlled transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) to decrease the discomfort of regional anaesthesia in dentistry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;26(5-6):417-20. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00062-6.
citation: Dhindsa A, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of electronic dental anesthesia with 2% lignocaine in various minor pediatric dental procedures: A clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jan;2(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.79305.
citation: Burri H, Piguet V. UninTENSional pacemaker interactions with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):283-4. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup008. No abstract available.
citation: Keskin EA, Onur O, Keskin HL, Gumus II, Kafali H, Turhan N. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves low back pain during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(1):76-83. doi: 10.1159/000337720. Epub 2012 Jun 21.