Clinical trial NCT01592708: Study of Anesthesia Techniques to Reduce Nausea and Vomiting After Jaw Corrective Surgery
Official title: A Prospective Evaluation of an Anesthesia Protocol to Reduce Post-operative and Post-discharge Nausea and Vomiting in a High Risk Orthognathic Surgery Population
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Post-operative Nausea
Post-operative Vomiting
Nausea Persistent
Keywords: orthognathic surgery
maxillary osteotomy
post operative nausea vomiting
post discharge nausea vomiting
anesthesia
Lead sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
First posted: 2012-05-07
Enrollment: 233
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 15
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to determine whether a multi-modal anesthesia and pain control protocol reduces post-operative and post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PONV and PDNV) in patients undergoing upper jaw corrective surgery.

Detailed description: Post-operative and post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PONV and PDNV) plague post-anesthesia and surgical care. This fact remains especially true for the orthognathic surgery (OS) population undergoing procedures involving the maxilla. Current data estimate that the incidence of PONV for OS patients undergoing surgery involving the maxilla is between 44% and 68% as compared to 8% to 30% in general surgical populations, despite application of conventional therapies. No one has accounted for or addressed this difference in clinical outcomes.

The implications of PONV for both individual health and overall health care system function are considerable. For individual patients, PONV can result in dehydration, wound dehiscence, intra-oral bleeding with continued swallowing of blood, significant anxiety and agitation (particularly for OS patients who often have heavy elastics closing their jaws together after surgery), and, in extreme cases, esophageal damage or the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Evidence shows fear of PONV overshadows concerns about pain in surgical patients. At the health care system level, evidence suggests PONV can significantly increase health care costs through prolonged post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stays and unplanned hospital admissions following outpatient procedures. In one seminal study the odds ratio for unplanned admission due to vomiting after intended outpatient surgery was 3.4, an alarmingly high figure exceeded only by the odds ratios for readmission due to pain or bleeding.

Established patient-related risk factors for PONV include female gender, tobacco abstinence, and history of prior PONV or motion sickness; additional patient factors may include younger age, low American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System status, anxiety, and a migraine headache history. Known anesthesia technique-related risk factors include volatile anesthetic and nitrous oxide use as well as excessive IV opioid administration. High dose neuromuscular blockade reversal agents have also been implicated. Surgery-related factors include duration of surgery and type of surgery, with OS ranking among the high-risk types.

Because PONV (and PDNV) prevention and treatment for the OS population remain under-investigated domains of clinical care, the investigators seek to address this deficiency through multi-modal prophylactic therapy. As more OS procedures are performed, many on an ambulatory basis, tactics to reduce the high incidence of PONV in this surgical population become important to maximize patient safety and satisfaction and to contain costs.

The investigators' protocol will synthesize several recommendations to reduce risk of PONV. Volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide will be avoided in favor of a total intravenous (IV) anesthetic involving propofol, neostigmine will be minimized, hydration goals will be set, and opioid sparing analgesics will be utilized. It is recommended that patients at high risk for PONV receive combination therapy with prophylactic agents from multiple classes. Among those shown to reduce PONV are 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (such as ondansetron), droperidol, and dexamethasone. Transdermal (TD) scopolamine is another effective adjunctive therapy to reduce PONV. Additionally, the investigators posit that the constant swallowing of small amounts of oozing blood and its retention in the stomach following OS contribute to the high incidence of PONV and PDNV in the OS population. Thus sub-bacteriostatic doses of erythromycin, capitalizing on erythromycin's established properties as a motilin agonist and thus a pro-kinetic, will be added to the evidence-based multi-modal regimen. Erythromycin has been chosen over metoclopramide due to safety profile and its well-characterized impact on gastric motility and even PONV.

Rescue anti-nausea and anti-emetic therapy will be chosen from several options at the discretion of the treating physician. Options that work through several mechanisms have been selected based on the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia Guidelines and on data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of over 2000 subjects.

Anesthesia variables as well as post-operative analgesic regimens are the primary targets of the investigators' multimodal regimen. Multimodal therapy has been shown to be superior to single agent therapy. One particularly compelling example showed a 98% response rate (no PONV) vs 76% among those receiving mono-therapy and 59% receiving routine anesthesia with placebo. Despite these reported successes, PONV remains a major problem for patients undergoing OS and many other procedures. This study represents one step towards understanding and addressing this significant peri-operative problem.

This proposed study will compare a cohort receiving a multimodal regimen with a retrospective control cohort reviewed in an IRB-approved study at the same institution. The investigators' re-use of the data adds no risk of harm or disclosure to the control subjects. Utilization of this retrospective control has an important advantage over a concurrent control: It allows comparison to a group treated at the same institution without the potential introduction of bias by alerting practitioners to the extent of the PONV problem in OS. The investigators believe that, as the under-recognition of the OS group as high-risk likely contributes to the high rate of PONV these patients experience, education of the anesthesia community introduces a potential confounding variable. Further, comparing practice "as is" to the proposed protocol maximizes generalizability to other institutions. If, as anticipated, significant reductions in PONV and PDNV experience are found, prospective randomized trials to tease out nuances of contributing factors could be undertaken.

Potential influencing patient- and surgery-related variables will be collected to allow comparison of the two cohorts using logistic regression analyses.

Even less well understood than PONV is PDNV; additional studies are needed to deepen understanding of the risk factors and treatment options for PDNV. A prior study from the investigators' institution demonstrated a high incidence of PDNV in the OS population - 43% experienced nausea and 23% vomited after discharge in contrast to general reported rates of 17% PDN and 8% PDV. This study should offer additional insight into PONV's less understood counterpart through diary review of patient's self-reported experience of PDNV following discharge from direct medical supervision.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* 15 years old or older
* Undergoing elective orthognathic surgery involving a maxillary osteotomy

Exclusion Criteria:

* uncontrolled GERD or hiatal hernia
* glaucoma
* seizure disorder
* COPD
* obstructive sleep apnea
* chronic kidney disease stage III or greater
* known prolonged QT interval (QTc \> 460) or the same found incidentally
* history of severe constipation
* pre-existing chronic nausea or vomiting
* allergies or contraindications to protocol medications
* patient insistence on inhalational induction of anesthesia.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Post-operative Nausea
timeFrame: End of surgery to discharge from hospital
measure: Post-operative Vomiting
timeFrame: End of surgery to discharge from hospital
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Hospital Length of Stay
timeFrame: Anesthesia start time to placement of hospital discharge order - average 26 - 28 hours
measure: Post-discharge Nausea
timeFrame: 1 week from discharge from hospital
measure: Post-discharge Vomiting
timeFrame: 1 week post discharge
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chapel Hill
country: United States
facility: UNC-Chapel Hill
state: North Carolina
Study officials:
affiliation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
name: Ceib Philllips, PhD, MPH
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Silva AC, O'Ryan F, Poor DB. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;64(9):1385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.024.
citation: Cohen MM, Duncan PG, DeBoer DP, Tweed WA. The postoperative interview: assessing risk factors for nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 1994 Jan;78(1):7-16. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199401000-00004.
citation: Chung F, Un V, Su J. Postoperative symptoms 24 hours after ambulatory anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Nov;43(11):1121-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03011838.
citation: Peacock JE, Philip BK. Ambulatory anesthesia experience with remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4 Suppl):22. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00005. No abstract available.
citation: Philip BK. Patients' assessment of ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1992 Sep-Oct;4(5):355-8. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(92)90155-t.
citation: Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Eubanks S, Kovac A, Philip BK, Sessler DI, Temo J, Tramer MR, Watcha M; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center. Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):62-71, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000068580.00245.95.
citation: Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jul;77(1):162-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199207000-00023.
citation: Watcha MF, White PF. Post-operative nausea and vomiting: do they matter? Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1995 May;10:18-23.
citation: Gold BS, Kitz DS, Lecky JH, Neuhaus JM. Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery. JAMA. 1989 Dec 1;262(21):3008-10.
citation: Koivuranta M, Laara E, Snare L, Alahuhta S. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 1997 May;52(5):443-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.117-az0113.x.
citation: Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00022.
citation: Gan T, Sloan F, Dear Gde L, El-Moalem HE, Lubarsky DA. How much are patients willing to pay to avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg. 2001 Feb;92(2):393-400. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200102000-00022.
citation: Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.
citation: Fero KE, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Apfel CC. Pharmacologic management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;12(15):2283-96. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.598856. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
citation: Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Habib AS, Hooper VD, Kovac AL, Kranke P, Myles P, Philip BK, Samsa G, Sessler DI, Temo J, Tramer MR, Vander Kolk C, Watcha M; Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1615-28, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000295230.55439.f4.
citation: Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196.
citation: Tramer MR, Fuchs-Buder T. Omitting antagonism of neuromuscular block: effect on postoperative nausea and vomiting and risk of residual paralysis. A systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Mar;82(3):379-86. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.3.379.
citation: Fortney JT, Gan TJ, Graczyk S, Wetchler B, Melson T, Khalil S, McKenzie R, Parrillo S, Glass PS, Moote C, Wermeling D, Parasuraman TV, Duncan B, Creed MR. A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups. Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):731-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011.
citation: Kranke P, Morin AM, Roewer N, Wulf H, Eberhart LH. The efficacy and safety of transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jul;95(1):133-43, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200207000-00024.
citation: Apfel CC, Zhang K, George E, Shi S, Jalota L, Hornuss C, Fero KE, Heidrich F, Pergolizzi JV, Cakmakkaya OS, Kranke P. Transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2010 Nov;32(12):1987-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.11.014.
citation: Itoh Z, Nakaya M, Suzuki T, Arai H, Wakabayashi K. Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1984 Dec;247(6 Pt 1):G688-94. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1984.247.6.G688.
citation: Kopp VJ, Mayer DC, Shaheen NJ. Intravenous erythromycin promotes gastric emptying prior to emergency anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1997 Sep;87(3):703-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199709000-00037. No abstract available.
citation: Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, Sinclair P; International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):101-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009.
citation: Barkun AN, Bardou M, Martel M, Gralnek IM, Sung JJ. Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Dec;72(6):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.011.
citation: Habib AS, Gan TJ. The effectiveness of rescue antiemetics after failure of prophylaxis with ondansetron or droperidol: a preliminary report. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Feb;17(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.04.004.
citation: Scuderi PE, James RL, Harris L, Mims GR 3rd. Multimodal antiemetic management prevents early postoperative vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1408-14. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00020.
citation: Phillips C, Blakey G 3rd. Short-term recovery after orthognathic surgery: a medical daily diary approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;37(10):892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
citation: Lu CW, Jean WH, Wu CC, Shieh JS, Lin TY. Antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide and diphenhydramine added to patient-controlled morphine analgesia: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;27(12):1052-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833f53b8.
citation: Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2000 Feb;59(2):213-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059020-00005.