Clinical trial NCT06805760: Ventilation Strategies Impact on Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lung Surgery Patients
Official title: Ventilation Strategies Impact on Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Lung Surgery Patients: a Prospective, Randomized, Triple-Blind Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Lung Surgery
Lead sponsor: Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2025-02-03
Enrollment: 120
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The purpose of this clinical trial was to understand the effects of variable tidal volume ventilation (V-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C-VCV), pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and open surgery (Open Surgery). controlled ventilation (C-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C-VCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) for open surgery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and segmental lung resection. VATS), segmentectomy (Segmentectomy), lobectomy (Lobectomy), and pneumonectomy (Pneumonectomy) on oxygen saturation and pulmonary complications, and length of hospitalization.

The main question it aims to answer is: variable tidal volume ventilation (V-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C-VCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).Does it decrease patient oxygen saturation, and does it increase pulmonary complications, length of hospitalization? Researchers compared variable tidal volume ventilation (V-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (V-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C-VCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) to compare them to see which mode of ventilation has the least physiologic disruption for the patient.

Participants will:

Select the appropriate surgical procedure according to the condition and be randomized to variable tidal volume ventilation (V-VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume- controlled ventilation (C-VCV), pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and were checked after surgery.

Patients' oxygen saturation, pulmonary complications, length of hospitalization were recorded


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients requiring any of open surgery, television-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), segmental lung resection (Segmentectomy), lobectomy, and total lung resection (Pneumonectomy).
* Patients who are able to receive any of the ventilation modes of controlled ventilation (C - VCV), pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (PRVC), conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C - VCV), pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and variable tidal volume ventilation (V - VCV).

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, and other vital organ dysfunction
* Patients with mental illness or cognitive disorders that prevent them from understanding the study and cooperating with the study process.
* Patients with hematologic disorders
* Pregnant or breastfeeding females

Primary outcomes:
measure: oxygen saturation
timeFrame: One week postoperative
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Baotou
country: China
facility: Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital
state: Inner Mongolia
Study officials:
References: