Clinical trial NCT04720573: Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Perioperative Arrhythmias
Official title: Influence of the Neuromuscular Blockade and Its Reversal on Perioperative Arrhythmias
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Neuromuscular Blockade
Keywords: Bradycardia
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Neostigmine
Neuromuscular Blockade
Sugammadex
Train-of-Four Monitoring
Lead sponsor: Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
Collaborators: name: Medipol University
First posted: 2021-01-22
Enrollment: 80
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 75
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: 1:1 randomization
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Patients scheduled for elective abdominopelvic laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were included. Rocuronium was used for the neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and the level of NMB was monitored with train-of-four (TOF) measurements. The participants from whom informed consent had been received were allocated to two groups according to the agent used for reversal of NMB, sugammadex, or neostigmine. The ECG recordings of the subjects were followed with a rhythm Holter device throughout the procedure until the postoperative 12th hour. Additionally, preoperative and immediate postoperative 12-lead ECGs were evaluated for corrected QT calculations and QT dispersion. Proarrhythmogenicity was assessed with QT related measurements. The documented arrhythmic events on the Holter monitoring were designated as clinical end-points.

Detailed description: Eighty consecutive patients, to whom an elective abdominopelvic surgery under general anesthesia was planned, were included in the study. Participants were allocated to two groups considering the agent to be used for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade by closed-envelope randomization. Neostigmine was used for this purpose in Group N, while sugammadex was used in Group S. Demographic features including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, presence of coronary artery disease, heart failure, and previous arrhythmia were noted. Body mass index was calculated with the Du Bois method. In the operation room, heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, arterial oxygen saturation, and TOF ratio were recorded. General anesthesia was induced with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol; and maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane. In Group N, 50 mcg/kg neostigmine and 20 mcg/kg atropine were used for NMB reversal. In Group S, reversal was achieved by the administration of sugammadex at a dose of 2 mg/kg. QT interval was measured in leads DII or V5 and adjusted to the heart rate by the Bazzett formula. QTc values at the baseline and postoperative ECGs were recorded and presented with milliseconds. An increase of over 60 ms in QTc interval or a postoperative measurement over 500 ms were assumed to be distinctly abnormal. QT dispersion was calculated by extracting the minimum QT length from the maximum QT length in 12-lead ECG. In rhythm holter monitoring, minimum and mean heart rates and specific arrhythmic events were recorded. In the heart rate variability analysis, the standard deviation of the interbeat intervals of normal sinus beats (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (rMSSD) were calculated. The following events were designated as clinical end-points.

* Pause (no waves on ECG recording at least for 3 seconds)
* Significant bradycardia (sinus bradycardia persisted at least for 30 seconds with a rate below 50 beats/min)
* High-grade atrioventricular block (2nd-degree Mobitz Type II or 3rd degree)
* Supraventricular tachycardia (sudden onset tachycardia with narrow QRS complexes persisted over 30 seconds)
* Atrial flutter or fibrillation (sustained over 30 seconds)
* Frequent premature ventricular beats (≥30 beats/hour)
* Any ventricular tachycardia (wide QRS complexes)

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Planned abdominopelvic surgery under general anesthesia
* ASA II-IV
* Willing to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Significantly impaired left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction \< 40%)
* Significant ongoing arrhythmia (sinus bradycardia with a heart rate below 40 beats/min, Mobitz Type II or 3rd-grade atrioventricular block, persistent or permanent atrial flutter or fibrillation, bigeminal or trigeminal ventricular premature beats, documented ventricular tachycardia)
* Severely reduced renal function (glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
* Severe respiratory diseases, neuromuscular disorders, and known allergy to anesthetic agents or adjuvants
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* Observing the typical signs of a channelopathy (short QT syndrome, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, etc.) and history of recent medical therapy with agents exhibiting a high probability of QT prolongation

Primary outcomes:
measure: Significant arrhythmic event
timeFrame: Up to 12 hours after surgical procedure
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Istanbul
country: Turkey
facility: Istanbul Medipol University
Study officials:
References:
citation: Lorentz MN, Vianna BS. Cardiac dysrhythmias and anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;61(6):798-813. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70090-3. English, Multiple languages.
citation: Dahl V, Pendeville PE, Hollmann MW, Heier T, Abels EA, Blobner M. Safety and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;26(10):874-84. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832c605b.
citation: Kizilay D, Dal D, Saracoglu KT, Eti Z, Gogus FY. Comparison of neostigmine and sugammadex for hemodynamic parameters in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Feb;28:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
citation: Staikou C, Stamelos M, Stavroulakis E. Impact of anaesthetic drugs and adjuvants on ECG markers of torsadogenicity. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):217-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet412. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
citation: Carron M, Zarantonello F, Tellaroli P, Ori C. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
citation: Hristovska AM, Duch P, Allingstrup M, Afshari A. The comparative efficacy and safety of sugammadex and neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults. A Cochrane systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):631-641. doi: 10.1111/anae.14160. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
citation: Yamashita Y, Takasusuki T, Kimura Y, Komatsuzaki M, Yamaguchi S. Effects of Neostigmine and Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade on QT Dispersion Under Propofol Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cardiol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s40119-018-0119-9. Epub 2018 Sep 14.