Clinical trial NCT03358576: Sulopenem Versus Ertapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)
Official title: Prospective, Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind Study of Efiicacy, Tolerability & Safety of Sulopenem & Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro-metronidazole for Treatment of cIAI in Adults
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Intra Abdominal Infections
Lead sponsor: Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2017-11-30
Enrollment: 674
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin-metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative able to provide a signed written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
2. Adult patients ≥18 years of age
3. EITHER:

   a. Intra-operative/post-operative enrollment with visual confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis including at least 1 of the following diagnosed during the surgical intervention: i. Cholecystitis with gangrenous rupture or perforation or progression of the infection beyond the gallbladder wall ii. Diverticular disease with perforation or abscess iii. Appendiceal perforation or peri-appendiceal abscess iv. Traumatic perforation of the intestines, only if operated on \>12 hours after perforation occurs v. Secondary peritonitis (but not spontaneous bacterial peritonitis associated with cirrhosis and chronic ascites) vi. Intra-abdominal abscess (including of liver or spleen provided that there was extension beyond the organ with evidence of intraperitoneal involvement).

   OR:

   b. Pre-operative enrollment where one of the following surgical procedures are planned within 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug: i. Open laparotomy, percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess, or laparoscopic surgery.
4. Evidence of systemic inflammatory indicators, with at least one of the following:

   i. Fever (defined as body temperature \>38°C) or hypothermia with a core body temperature \<35°C ii. Elevated white blood cell count (\>12,000 cells/mm3) iii. Drop in blood pressure (systolic BP must be \<90 mmHg without pressor support) iv. Increased heart rate (\>90 bpm) and respiratory rate (\>20 breaths/min) v. Hypoxia (oxygen saturation ≤90 percent on room air)
5. Physical findings or symptoms consistent with intra-abdominal infection, with at least one of the following:

   i. Abdominal pain and/or tenderness, with or without rebound ii. Localized or diffuse abdominal wall rigidity iii. Abdominal mass iv. Nausea/vomiting v. Altered Mental Status
6. Specimen/s from the surgical intervention were sent for culture.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patient diagnosed with traumatic bowel perforation undergoing surgery within 12 hours; perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing surgery within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes in which the primary etiology was not likely to be infectious.
2. Patient has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation.
3. Patient has simple cholecystitis or gangrenous cholecystitis without rupture, or simple appendicitis, or acute suppurative cholangitis; or infected necrotizing pancreatitis or pancreatic abscess.
4. Patient whose surgery included staged abdominal repair, or "open abdomen" technique, or marsupialization.
5. Patient known at study entry to have a complicated intra-abdominal infection caused by pathogens resistant to the study antimicrobial agents.
6. Patient needed effective concomitant systemic antibacterials (oral, IV, or intramuscular) or antifungals in addition to those designated in the 2 study groups, except vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin if started for known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Enterococcus spp. as per clinical study protocol (CSP).
7. Patient has perinephric infections or an indwelling peritoneal dialysis catheter.
8. Patient has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites (e.g., amoebic liver abscess), virus, or tuberculosis.
9. Patient has a known history of serious allergy, hypersensitivity or any serious reaction to carbapenem antibiotics, or to other β-lactam antibiotics
10. Patient known to have any of the following laboratory values as defined below:

    1. Hematocrit \<25% or hemoglobin \<8 g/dL
    2. Absolute neutrophil count \<1000/mm3
    3. Platelet count \<75,000/mm3
    4. Bilirubin \>3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN), unless isolated hyperbilirubinemia was directly related to the acute infection or known Gilbert's disease
    5. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3 x ULN values at Screening. Patients with elevations of AST and/or ALT up to 5 x ULN will be eligible if these elevations are acute and directly related to the infectious process being treated. This must be documented
    6. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \>3 x ULN. Patients with values \>3.0 x ULN and \<5.0 x ULN are eligible if this value is acute and directly related to the infectious process being treated. This must be documented.
    7. Estimated creeatinine clearance \<50 mL/min
11. Patient has a body mass index \>45 kg/m2.
12. Patient has APACHE II score \>30.
13. Patient considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness, including septic shock that was associated with a high risk of mortality.
14. Patient unlikely to respond to 10-14 days of treatment with antibiotics.
15. Patient received systemic antibacterial agents within the 72-hour period prior to study entry, unless either of the following pertained:

    a. Patient has a new infection (not considered a treatment failure) and both of the following were met: i. Patient received no more than 24 hours of total prior antibiotic therapy ii. Patient received ≤1 dose of a treatment regimen post-operatively and antibiotics were not received more than 6 hours post-procedure.

    b. Patient considered to have failed the previous treatment regimen i.e., pre-operative treatment of any duration with non-study systemic antimicrobial therapy for peritonitis or abscess permitted provided that all of the following are met: i. The treatment regimen had been administered for at least 72 hours and was judged to have been inadequate ii. The patient had an operative intervention that was just completed or was intended no more than 24 hours after study entry iii. Findings of infection were documented at surgery iv. Specimens for bacterial cultures and susceptibility testing were taken at operative intervention v. No further non-study antibacterials were administered after randomization.
16. Patient has a concurrent infection that may interfere with the evaluation of response to the study antibiotic.
17. Patient receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
18. Patient has a history of acute hepatitis in the recent past (3 months prior to study entry), chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, acute hepatic failure, or acute decompensation of chronic hepatic failure.
19. Patient has past or current history of epilepsy or seizure disorders excluding febrile seizures of childhood.
20. Patient immunocompromised as evidenced by any of the following:

    1. Human immunodeficiency virus infection, with either a recent (in the past 6 months) acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining condition or a CD4 + T lymphocyte count \<200/mm3
    2. Systemic or hematological malignancy requiring chemotherapeutic or radiologic/immunologic interventions within 6 weeks prior to randomization, or anticipated to begin prior to completion of study
    3. Immunosuppressive therapy, including maintenance corticosteroid therapy (\>40 mg/day equivalent prednisolone) for 5 days or more.
21. Patient participating in any other clinical study that involved the administration of an investigational medication at the time of presentation, during the course of the study, or who had received treatment with an investigational medication in the 30 days prior to study enrollment, or had previously been enrolled in this study or had been treated with sulopenem.
22. Patient is in a situation or has a condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with optimal participation in the study.
23. Patient unlikely to comply with protocol e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study.
24. Patient has known inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) or Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
25. Patients with a history of blood dyscrasias
26. Patients with a history of uric acid kidney stones
27. Patients with acute gouty attack
28. Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
29. Females of child-bearing potential who are unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions, have a positive pregnancy test result within 24 hours of study entry, are otherwise known to be pregnant, or are currently breastfeeding an infant.
30. Male subjects who do not agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 14 days post treatment.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
timeFrame: Day 28 +/- 1 day
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success
timeFrame: Day 11-14 +/- 1 day
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Chula Vista
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: California
city: Torrance
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: California
city: Idaho Falls
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Idaho
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Massachusetts
city: Royal Oak
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Michigan
city: Saint Louis
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Missouri
city: Butte
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Montana
city: Lincoln
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Nebraska
city: Omaha
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Nebraska
city: Somers Point
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: New Jersey
city: Columbus
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Ohio
city: Columbus
country: United States
facility: Medical Facility
state: Ohio
city: Blagoevgrad
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Lom
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Pleven
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Plovdiv
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Plovdiv
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Ruse
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Sofia
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Varna
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Varna
country: Bulgaria
facility: Medical Facility
city: Kohtla-Järve
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tallinn
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tallin
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tartu
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Viljandi
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Võru
country: Estonia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Gori
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Kutaisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Tbilisi
country: Georgia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Kaposvár
country: Hungary
facility: Medical Facility
city: Pécs
country: Hungary
facility: Medical Facility
city: Veszprém
country: Hungary
facility: Medical Facility
city: Daugavpils
country: Latvia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Riga
country: Latvia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Rēzekne
country: Latvia
facility: Medical Facility
city: Bielsk Podlaski
country: Poland
facility: Medical Facility
Study officials:
References: