Clinical trial NCT02508714: Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents
Official title: Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents (BIONYX): A Randomized Trial With Stent Evaluation in All-comers IV (TWENTE IV)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Coronary Artery Disease
Angina Pectoris
Unstable Angina Pectoris
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Coronary Stenosis
Coronary Restenosis
Lead sponsor: Thorax Centrum Twente
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-07-27
Enrollment: 2470
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.

Detailed description: rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.

Aim:

The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of the bioresorbable polymer coated stent (ORSIRO) and a new generation permanent polymer coated stent (RESOLUTE ONYX) in an all-comers patient population and non-inferiority setting.

Study design:

The study is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicentre trial with 1:1 randomization for drug-eluting stent type, stratified for gender and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

Study population:

Patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. A total of 2,470 patients will be included.

Intervention:

One group will receive the ORSIRO stent, the other group will receive the RESOLUTE ONYX stent. All other intervention and procedural characteristics are similar.

Primary study outcome:

Incidence of target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year follow-up (according to ARC definitions). Components of the primary endpoint in hierarchical order: - Cardiac death: all deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. - Target vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) that is Q-wave or non-Q-wave, that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel. - Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients of 18 years and older, requiring PCI for the treatment of significant coronary artery or bypass graft lesions, being eligible for treatment with drug eluting stents according to clinical guidelines and/or the operators' judgement, and capable of providing informed consent.
* Patients with all clinical syndromes will be enrolled without any exclusion based on number, type, location or length of lesions to be treated.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Known intolerance to components of one of the study DES, or known intolerance to antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy that prevents adherence to any dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT).
* Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of DAPT during the first 3 months after randomization.
* Participation in another randomized cardiovascular device trial or randomized pharmacological study related to antithrombotic and/or anticoagulant therapy before reaching the primary endpoint.
* Known pregnancy, adherence to scheduled follow-up is unlikely, or life expectancy is assumed to be less than 1 year

Primary outcomes:
measure: Target vessel failure (TVF)
timeFrame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Death at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year
measure: Myocardial infarction at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year
measure: Revascularization at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year
measure: Stent thrombosis at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year
measure: Target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year
measure: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
measure: Patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
measure: Major Bleeding at 1 and 2 year follow-up
timeFrame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
Other outcomes:
measure: Longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) and deliverability
timeFrame: 1 year
Locations:
city: Charleroi
country: Belgium
facility: CHU Charleroi
city: Hasselt
country: Belgium
facility: Jessa Ziekenhuis
city: Haifa
country: Israel
facility: Rambam
city: Den Haag
country: Netherlands
facility: Haga Ziekenhuis
state: Zuid Holland
city: Arnhem
country: Netherlands
facility: Rijnstate Hospital
city: Emmen
country: Netherlands
facility: Treant Zorggroep
city: Enschede
country: Netherlands
facility: Medisch Spectrum Twente
Study officials:
affiliation: Thorax Centrum Twente
name: Clemens von Birgelen, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: von Birgelen C, Sen H, Lam MK, Danse PW, Jessurun GA, Hautvast RW, van Houwelingen GK, Schramm AR, Gin RM, Louwerenburg JW, de Man FH, Stoel MG, Lowik MM, Linssen GC, Said SA, Nienhuis MB, Verhorst PM, Basalus MW, Doggen CJ, Tandjung K. Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):413-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62037-1. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
citation: Sen H, Lam MK, Lowik MM, Danse PW, Jessurun GA, van Houwelingen KG, Anthonio RL, Tjon Joe Gin RM, Hautvast RW, Louwerenburg JH, de Man FH, Stoel MG, van der Heijden LC, Linssen GC, IJzerman MJ, Tandjung K, Doggen CJ, von Birgelen C. Clinical Events and Patient-Reported Chest Pain in All-Comers Treated With Resolute Integrity and Promus Element Stents: 2-Year Follow-Up of the DUTCH PEERS (DUrable Polymer-Based STent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt Versus ReSolute Integrity) Randomized Trial (TWENTE II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):889-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.033. Epub 2015 May 20.
citation: Pinxterhuis TH, Ploumen EH, Zocca P, Doggen CJM, Schotborgh CE, Anthonio RL, Roguin A, Danse PW, Benit E, Aminian A, Stoel MG, Linssen GCM, Geelkerken RH, von Birgelen C. Outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary stents in patients with concomitant peripheral arterial disease: A patient-level pooled analysis of four randomized trials. Atherosclerosis. 2022 Aug;355:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 20.
citation: Ploumen EH, Pinxterhuis TH, Zocca P, Roguin A, Anthonio RL, Schotborgh CE, Benit E, Aminian A, Danse PW, Doggen CJM, von Birgelen C, Kok MM. Impact of prediabetes and diabetes on 3-year outcome of patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents in two large-scale randomized clinical trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Oct 30;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01405-4.
citation: Ploumen EH, Buiten RA, Zocca P, Doggen CJ, Aminian A, Schotborgh CE, Jessurun GA, Roguin A, Danse PW, Benit E, von Birgelen C. First Report of 3-Year Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Novel Resolute Onyx Stents in the Randomized BIONYX Trial. Circ J. 2021 Oct 25;85(11):1983-1990. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0292. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
citation: von Birgelen C, Zocca P, Buiten RA, Jessurun GAJ, Schotborgh CE, Roguin A, Danse PW, Benit E, Aminian A, van Houwelingen KG, Anthonio RL, Stoel MG, Somi S, Hartmann M, Linssen GCM, Doggen CJM, Kok MM. Thin composite wire strut, durable polymer-coated (Resolute Onyx) versus ultrathin cobalt-chromium strut, bioresorbable polymer-coated (Orsiro) drug-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIONYX): an international, single-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Oct 6;392(10154):1235-1245. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32001-4. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
citation: van der Heijden LC, Kok MM, Zocca P, Jessurun GAJ, Schotborgh CE, Roguin A, Benit E, Aminian A, Danse PW, Lowik MM, Linssen GCM, van der Palen J, Doggen CJM, von Birgelen C. Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Orsiro Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Resolute Onyx Stents (BIONYX): Rationale and design of the randomized TWENTE IV multicenter trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 21.