Clinical trial NCT05593614: Efficacy and Safety of ATX01 in Adult Patients With CIPN (Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy)
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ATX01 (Topical Amitriptyline Hydrochloride 10% and 15% w/w) in Comparison to Placebo, in Cancer Survivor Adult Patients With Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Lead sponsor: AlgoTherapeutix
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2022-10-25
Enrollment: 276
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of twice daily applications of ATX01 (10% \& 15%) versus placebo during a 12-week treatment period in treating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in adult cancer survivor patients.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patients of 18 years and older.
2. Patients having signed a written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure.
3. Body mass index of 18 to 35 kg/m2 (inclusive).
4. With an estimated life expectancy ≥6 months at study entry.
5. Patients with painful sensory CIPN resulting from prior treatment of cancer with taxanes or platins. A diagnosis of CIPN should be supported by i) onset of pain in hands or feet after exposure to taxanes or platins, ii) presence of painful symptoms in a symmetrical stocking and/or glove distribution, AND iii) painful symptoms may be accompanied by nonpainful symptoms (eg, tingling/pins and needles intensity and numbness intensity).
6. Patients who have stopped their chemotherapy treatment with taxanes or platins or any other neurotoxic chemotherapy for ≥24 weeks at the time of the screening visit.
7. Patients with CIPN pain for ≥24 weeks at the time of the screening visit.
8. Patients with a mean value of pain intensity ≥4 and ≤9 in target study extremities (left and right feet or left and right hands) on the 11 point NPRS at baseline. Non target extremities can be treated regardless of the pain intensity.
9. Patients with symmetrical stocking or glove distribution pain, NPRS (≤1 point difference) in the target study extremities at screening.
10. Neuropathic Pain (DN4) score ≥4 in the target study extremities (hands or feet) at the screening visit
11. Treatment naïve patients or patients in whom any prior CIPN treatment (except oral amitriptyline \[AMT\]) has not been modified during the 4 weeks preceding the screening visit and is planned to be maintained at the same regimen during the course of the study (prior treatment includes pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments).
12. Male patients should agree to use a condom along with another medically acceptable contraceptive method, where applicable according to local guidelines, if he is engaged in sexual activity with a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) from the day of the signature of the informed consent and up to 90 days after the End-of-Study (EoS) Visit. Male patients should agree not to donate sperm until 30 calendar days after the last dose of study drug.
13. Females must comply with the following in order to be enrolled:

    1. WOCBP with negative serum pregnancy test results can be enrolled only if willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method, ie, oral contraceptives, patch contraceptives, injection contraceptives, implantable hormonal contraceptives, male condom with intravaginal spermicide, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device or system, surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and/or bilateral salpingectomy), tubal ligation/occlusion, vasectomized partner, or sexual abstinence, if this is the patient's current practice, from at least 14 days prior to the screening visit and throughout the study and for at least 30 days after the completion of the study.
    2. Or surgically sterilized for at least 6 months.
    3. Or menopausal for at least 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are not compliant in completion of pain ratings during the screening period. Patients having \<5 of 7 records of average pain intensity in the target study extremities from Day -7 to Day -1 will be excluded. If a patient misses records of 2 days out of 7 days, the patient will be included in the study; however, patients missing 3 or more days of records will be excluded from the study.
2. Clinical evidence of a preexisting painful peripheral neuropathy resulting from another cause than chemotherapy, eg, diabetic neuropathy, posttraumatic neuropathy, carpal/tarsal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, brachial plexopathy, or other preexisting symptomatic neuropathy due to alcoholism, vitamin B deficiency, hypothyroidism, human immunodeficiency virus. Patients may be included in the study, providing that pain appeared after chemotherapy, while other non-painful symptoms could have been present before start of chemotherapy.
3. Skin irritation, or lesions (eg open skin wounds, infections, inflammations, or exfoliative dermatitis) of any type on the hands or feet (or only on the hands if the study drug is not applied on the feet and vice versa \[only on the feet if the study drug is not applied on the hands\]).
4. Presence of glaucoma.
5. Presence of urinary retention (or significant prostatic hypertrophy at risk of urinary retention).
6. Angina or myocardial infarction in the year preceding screening visit.
7. History and/or presence of major depressive episode. Patients with a medical history of bipolar disorder, alcohol abuse, or psychotic disorder are also excluded.
8. Patients who are at significant risk of suicide, or are a danger to self or others, in the opinion of the investigator, based upon clinical interview and the C-SSRS at screening and baseline. Affirmative answer to suicidal ideation questions 4 or 5 within the last 6 months and / or suicidal behavior (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and/or preparatory acts/behavior) within the last 2 years are exclusionary.
9. Pregnant or lactating women.
10. Abnormality in the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening that in the opinion of the investigator increases the risk of participating in the study, such as a corrected QT Fridericia (QTcF) interval \>430 msec for males or \>450 msec for females.
11. A history of additional risk factors for Torsade de Pointe (eg, heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of long QT syndrome).
12. The use of concomitant medications within 24 weeks prior to Day 1 and/or during the study or the equivalent of 5 half-lives that prolong the QT/QTc interval, eg, Class 1 antiarrhythmics (eg, quinidine, disopyramide, procainamide) and Class 3 antiarrhythmics (eg, amiodarone, sotalol), first generation antihistamines (such as diphenhydramine, hydroxyzine, astemizole, terfenadine, and ebastine), antipsychotics known to prolong QT interval, and antimalarials (eg, mefloquine, quinine), tricyclic antidepressants (eg, AMT), tetracyclic antidepressants (eg, maprotiline), cisapride.
13. The use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 24 weeks (or the equivalent of 5 half-lives) prior to Day 1 and/or during the study.
14. The use of opioids within 4 weeks (or the equivalent of 5 half lives) prior to Day 1 and/or during the study.
15. History of illicit drug use or confirmed drugs of abuse at screening. Positive urine drug screen for prescribed medication is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
16. Patients likely to require neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment or any other treatment during the study, which may interfere with compliance to the protocol, ability to complete the study and study assessments except treatments authorized in inclusion criterion #11.
17. Failure to respond to more than 2 analgesics (regardless of the route of administration) from different drug classes (including antidepressants and anticonvulsants) due to lack of efficacy to treat CIPN at any time in the past. The definition of failure to respond is left to the investigator's judgement and should be understood as exclusion of patients who are non-responding to more than 2 analgesics thought to be effective for neuropathic pain that were used at therapeutic doses in the 6 months prior to screening visit.
18. Treatment with oral or topical AMT or nortriptyline in the past 4 weeks prior to baseline visit.
19. Any known hypersensitivity to AMT (regardless of the route of administration) in any salt form or to any constituent of the topical formulation.
20. Any contraindication to the use of acetaminophen/paracetamol.
21. Use of glutathione, vitamin E, or minocycline within 12 weeks of screening.
22. Any topical treatment on treated extremities for any indication, other than cosmetic use of creams and lotions, within the previous 12 weeks prior to Baseline visit.
23. Any topical treatment for pain on extremities including use of:

    1. over-the-counter capsaicin on extremities within 2 weeks of Baseline visit,
    2. and/or Qutenza within 12 weeks of Baseline visit,
    3. and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, menthol, methyl salicylate, local anesthetics within 1 week of screening.
24. Poor metabolizer for cytochrome P450 CYP2D6.
25. Intake in the 4 weeks preceding the screening visit of any strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP2D6.
26. Treatment with an investigational drug in the previous 4 weeks or greater prior to Baseline visit, according to local requirements.
27. Any condition that the investigator feels would place the patient at increased risk if the investigational therapy is initiated, such as, but not limited to, hyperthyroidism, convulsive disorder, advanced hepatic disease, pylorus, stenosis, or paralytic ileus.
28. The investigator considers the patient unfit for the study as a result of the medical interview, physical examination, or screening investigations, in particular any status or disease making the patient unable to follow instructions.
29. The patient is unable to apply the study drug on hands or feet.
30. The patient is an employee of the investigator, study site, sponsor, or CRO with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of the investigator, study site, or sponsor, or a family member of the site employee or the investigator.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline to Week 12 in the weekly mean of the daily NPRS score assessing average pain intensity in target study extremities related to CIPN in the past 24 hours.
timeFrame: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Percentage of patients achieving ≥30% pain reduction from baseline in the weekly mean NPRS average pain intensity related to CIPN at Week 12
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Percentage of patients achieving ≥50% pain reduction from baseline in the weekly mean NPRS average pain intensity related to CIPN at Week 12.
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Mean change from baseline to each visit in tingling/pins and needles intensity and numbness intensity in target study extremities as measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) assessing each symptom
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Proportion of patients achieving various percentages of reduction in average pain intensity in target study extremities (cumulative responder curve) throughout the study.
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Proportion of patients achieving various percentages of reduction in worst pain intensity in target study extremities (cumulative responder curve) throughout the study.
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Change from baseline to Week 4 and 8 in the weekly mean of the daily NPRS score assessing average pain intensity in target study extremities related to CIPN in the past 24 hours
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks
measure: Change from baseline to each visit in the weekly mean of the daily NPRS assessing worst pain intensity in target study extremities related to CIPN in the past 24 hours
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Percentage of patients with at least "improved" on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at each visit
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Mean change from baseline to each visit in pain interference with daily life using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form questionnaire (BPI-SF item 9 only)
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Mean change from baseline to each visit in the calculated mean NPRS average pain intensity in the nontarget study extremities
timeFrame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks
measure: Mean change from baseline to Week 12 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN 20-item scale (EORTC QLQ CIPN20)
timeFrame: 12 weeks
measure: Use of rescue medication including the proportion of patients using rescue medication, the frequency, and amount used
timeFrame: Up to 12 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Clermont
country: United States
facility: South Lake Pain Institute
state: Florida
city: Miami
country: United States
facility: MGM Medical Care Research & Rehab, LLC
state: Florida
city: Port Charlotte
country: United States
facility: Medsol Clinical Research Center, Inc
state: Florida
city: Rockledge
country: United States
facility: Knight Neurology - Clinical Research
state: Florida
city: Overland Park
country: United States
facility: Neuroscience Research Center, LLC.
state: Kansas
city: Bethesda
country: United States
facility: The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders (CCBD)
state: Maryland
city: Rochester
country: United States
facility: University of Rochester Medical Center
state: New York
city: Bellaire
country: United States
facility: HD Research
state: Texas
city: Aalst
country: Belgium
facility: OLV Hospital Aalst: gastro-enterologie
city: Edegem
country: Belgium
facility: Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
city: Gent
country: Belgium
facility: Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent (UZ Gent)
city: Pellenberg
country: Belgium
facility: UZ Leuven / Campus Pellenberg / Pain Center
city: Yvoir
country: Belgium
facility: CHU UCL Namur - site Godinne
city: Prague
country: Czechia
facility: Clinitrial s.r.o.
city: Prague
country: Czechia
facility: Praglandia s.r.o.
city: Teplice
country: Czechia
facility: Nemocnice Teplice
city: Bayonne
country: France
facility: Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque
city: Bordeaux
country: France
facility: Institute Bergonie
city: Montpellier
country: France
facility: CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Saint Eloi
city: Paris
country: France
facility: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
city: Poitiers
country: France
facility: CHU POITIERS, Hépato-Gastro Entérologie
city: Reims
country: France
facility: GODINOT Institute
city: Strasbourg
country: France
facility: Strasbourg Oncologie Liberale
city: Suresnes
country: France
facility: Hôpital Foch
city: Campobasso
country: Italy
facility: Gemelli Molise S.p.a.
city: Meldola
country: Italy
facility: Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e La cura dei Tumori Srl (IRST)
city: Milan
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale -. Maggiore Policlinico
city: Monza
country: Italy
facility: ASST Monza - Ospedale S. Gerardo di Monza
city: Pavia
country: Italy
facility: Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo - Universita degli Studi di Pavia
city: Roma
country: Italy
facility: Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini
city: Konin
country: Poland
facility: Przychodnia Lekarska "Komed" Roman Karaszewski Oddzial Chemioterapii Jednego Dnia
city: Tychy
country: Poland
facility: Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Poradnia Leczenia Bolu Przewleklego
city: Zabrze
country: Poland
facility: ClinHouse sp z o.o. - ClinHouse Centrum Medyczne
city: Łódź
country: Poland
facility: Instytut "Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki" Klinika Onkologii
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital de la Santa Creu I de Sant Pau
city: Barcelona
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
city: Córdoba
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
city: Jaén
country: Spain
facility: Complejo Hospitalarion de Jaen
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Ruber Internacional
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Madrid Sanchinarro Hospital
city: Reus
country: Spain
facility: Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus
city: Valencia
country: Spain
facility: Unidad de Investigacion Clinica FINCIVO
Study officials:
References: