Clinical trial NCT03136250: Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition, Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain
Official title: Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition, Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Neck Pain
Keywords: Muscle Energy Techniques
Autogenic Inhibition
Reciprocal Inhibition
Stretching
Range of Motion
Muscle Strength
VAS
Neck Disability Index
NDI
Lead sponsor: Foundation University Islamabad
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-05-02
Enrollment: 78
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: A randomized Controlled trial will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and MET stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Neck pain is among the most common musculoskeletal disorders worldwide and is an important public health issue in terms of personal wellbeing. Prevalence of neck pain show excessive variations, with a point prevalence varying between 6% and 22%, and one year prevalence ranging between 1.5-75%. Neck pain like all other mechanical disorders leads to pain, disability and decreased range of motion (ROM). Stretching is a very common exercise performed by sportsmen, elderly, in physical therapy and rehabilitation patients, thus practiced in all sorts of fitness programs. The major types of stretching included in the literature are static, dynamic and pre-contraction stretching; of which static stretching is the conventional type of stretching. The different types of pre-contraction stretching include Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching, Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR), Post Facilitation stretch (PFS) and Active Isolated Stretch (AIS). Pre-contraction stretching is also considered a part of Muscle Energy Technique (MET). Recently MET and pre-contraction stretching have been shown to have significant superiority over conventional stretching in management of mechanical neck pain, but the evidence is currently lacking regarding which of the two pre-contraction stretching protocols, namely autogenic and reciprocal inhibition is more effective than the other. A RCT will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and pre-contraction stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 to 70 years;
2. Neck pain on NPRS 4 to 8 (moderate cases);
3. Subacute or chronic cases (4 to 12 weeks).
4. Decreased or painful Cervical range of motion (CROM)

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Signs of serious pathology (e.g., malignancy, inflammatory disorder, infection);
2. History of cervical spine surgery in previous 12 months;
3. History of trauma or fractures in cervical spine;
4. Signs of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; and
5. Vascular syndromes such as VBI

Primary outcomes:
measure: Pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) - Change is being assessed
timeFrame: Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)
measure: Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) - Change is being assessed
timeFrame: Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)
measure: Neck Disability Index (NDI) - Change is being assessed
timeFrame: Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)
measure: Cervical Isometric Muscle Strength (Modified Sphygmomanometer dynamometry) - Change is being assessed
timeFrame: Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Islamabad
country: Pakistan
facility: Foundation University Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences
Study officials:
affiliation: Foundation University Islamabad
name: Muhammad Osama, DPT, MS-OMPT, CHPE
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: