Clinical trial NCT04310579: Clinical Study to Investigate the Effect of the Combination of Psychotropic Drugs and an Opioid on Ventilation
Official title: Clinical Study to Investigate the Effect of the Combination of Psychotropic Drugs and an Opioid on Ventilation
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Hypercapnia
Ventilatory Depression
Keywords: Opioids
Sedative psychotropic drugs
Lead sponsor: Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Sponsor class: FED
Collaborators: name: Spaulding Clinical Research LLC
name: Leiden University
First posted: 2020-03-17
Enrollment: 55
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 50
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: This clinical study consists of 3 parts:

1. Up to 10 subjects in the Lead-In reproducibility assessment will have no drug treatment, only Read Rebreathing assessments.
2. Approximately 20 subjects in Part 1 will be randomized to complete four treatments over four 1-day periods. Each period will be followed by 2 days of washout. Thus, Part 1 will have a cross-over component.
3. Approximately 20 subjects in Part 2 will be randomized to complete three treatments over three 5-day periods. Each period will be followed by 7 days of washout. Thus, Part 2 will have a cross-over component.

A maximum of 10 additional replacement subjects may be enrolled.
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Opioids can decrease breathing and co-administration of benzodiazepines with opioids can further decrease breathing. It is unknown whether certain other drugs also decrease breathing when co-administered with opioids. The objective of this study is to determine whether certain drugs combined with an opioid decrease breathing compared to breathing with an opioid alone.

In order to assess this, this study will utilize the Read Rebreathing method, where study participants breathe increased levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide. The increased levels of carbon dioxide cause the study participants to increase breathing. This increased breathing response can be decreased by opioids and benzodiazepines, and potentially other drugs. Using this procedure, low doses of opioids or benzodiazepines can be administered that have minimal-to-no effects on breathing when study participants are going about normal activities breathing room air, however breathing increases less than expected as carbon dioxide levels are increased. This study will also obtain quantitative pupillometry measurements before and after each rebreathing assessment to allow for comparisons of pupillary changes to ventilatory changes when subjects receive different drugs and drug combinations.

This study includes three parts: A Lead-In Reproducibility Phase and two main parts (Part 1 and Part 2). The Lead-In Reproducibility Phase will measure the variability between study participants and between repeated uses of the method in the same study participant within a day and between days. Part 1 will study an opioid alone, benzodiazepine alone, and their combination to show the methodology will detect changes in breathing at low doses of the drugs that are known to affect breathing. Part 2 will assess whether two drugs, selected due to their effects on breathing in a nonclinical model, decrease the breathing response when combined with an opioid compared to when an opioid is administered alone.

Detailed description: Opioids can cause respiratory/ventilatory depression, and this can be exacerbated when opioids are co-administered with benzodiazepines. Research suggests this is caused by a reduced respiratory/ventilatory response to counteract increasing levels of systemic carbon dioxide (CO2). It is unknown whether certain other sedative psychotropic drugs can exacerbate opioid-induced respiratory/ventilatory depression. Studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of selected drugs in a non-clinical model. This clinical study will evaluate two drugs (quetiapine and paroxetine) that caused an effect when combined with oxycodone in the non-clinical model.

Study designs were evaluated that would allow a safe and controlled assessment of the effects of drug combinations on respiratory/ventilatory depression and a methodology was selected called the Read breathing procedure which introduces increased levels of CO2 to cause study participants to increase ventilation by having study participants rebreathe through a circuit with 93% oxygen (O2) and 7% CO2. Previous studies have shown this "hypercapnic ventilatory response" can be decreased by opioids and benzodiazepines and potentially other drugs. Using this procedure, low doses of opioids or benzodiazepines can be administered that have minimal-to-no effects on respiration/ventilation when study participants are going about normal activities breathing room air, however ventilation is decreased relative to the expected increase in ventilation as CO2 levels are increased during rebreathing. Thus, there is minimal risk of true respiratory depression (i.e. inadequate gas exchange) and, if needed, the investigators can immediately halt the experiment and have the study participant breathe room air or 100% O2.

Using the Read rebreathing methodology, the current clinical study was designed to generate data characterizing changes in the ventilatory response to hypercapnia when administering quetiapine and paroxetine alone or in combination with oxycodone. Information obtained from this study will inform on the potential for the specific studied drugs to affect ventilation when combined with an opioid and may also demonstrate the utility of this study design and methodology as an approach for evaluating the effect of an investigational drug and drug combinations on ventilatory depression. Thus, this study includes a lead-in reproducibility phase to quantify the intra- and inter-subject variability within a day and between days. In addition, this study includes a positive control phase with relatively low doses of opioid (oxycodone) alone, benzodiazepine (midazolam) alone and their combination to help assess assay sensitivity. While opioids and benzodiazepines have been studied alone and in combination with the rebreathing method previously, many of these studies are older and it is important to define the reproducibility and effects of the drugs at relatively low doses. Together, these components of the study will further define the reproducibility and sensitivity of the methodology that could be applied to a broader range of investigational drugs in the future to assess their safety when combined with opioids.

In addition, pupillary measurements have been used to study the pharmacodynamic effects of opioids and opioid antagonists (Skulberg et al, 2018; Rollins et al, 2014) and there has been interest in expanding its use in clinical studies. However, there are limited data directly comparing pupillary changes to ventilatory changes and some drugs may influence the pupillary response to opioids (Kummer et al, 2011). As an exploratory endpoint, this study will obtain quantitative pupillometry measurements before and after each rebreathing assessment to allow for comparisons of pupillary changes to ventilatory changes when subjects receive different drugs and drug combinations.

This study includes three parts: A Lead-In Reproducibility Phase and two main parts (Part 1 and Part 2). The lead-in reproducibility phase will quantify the intra- and inter-subject variability of the Read Rebreathing methodology within a day and between days. Part 1 is a positive control phase with doses of an opioid (oxycodone) alone, benzodiazepine (midazolam) alone, their combination, and placebo to help assess ability of the procedure to detect changes in ventilation. Part 2 will assess whether two sedative psychotropic drugs (quetiapine and paroxetine), selected due to their effects in a nonclinical model, decrease the ventilatory response to hypercapnia compared to an opioid (oxycodone) alone. The doses of oxycodone and midazolam were selected to be less than those previously administered in healthy volunteers undergoing the Read Rebreathing or similar respiratory circuit procedures that increase the inspired level of CO2. The doses of quetiapine and paroxetine were selected to reach clinical steady-state levels.

The Lead-In Reproducibility Phase will have up to 10 healthy volunteer participants enrolled in two cohorts of approximately five. Participants will perform the Read Rebreathing procedure five times on day 1 and five times on day 2.

Part 1 will be a 4-period randomized crossover study with approximately 20 healthy volunteer participants. Participants will receive four different treatments (oxycodone, midazolam, oxycodone + midazolam, and placebo) in a random order across each of the 1-day study periods. There will be two days of washout between each period. During each period, participants will perform the Read Rebreathing procedure seven times, for a total of 28 rebreathing assessments in Part 1. For Part 1, blood samples will also be collected for determination of study drug concentration.

Part 2 will be a 3-period randomized crossover study with approximately 20 healthy volunteer participants. Participants will receive three different treatments (oxycodone, oxycodone + quetiapine, and oxycodone + paroxetine) in a random order across each of the 5-day periods. Oxycodone will only be administered on day 1 and day 5 of each treatment period. The other drugs will be administered every day of the treatment period such that there will be lower concentrations on day 1 and higher concentrations on day 5, which are the days when oxycodone is co-administered. Read Rebreathing assessments will be performed on day 1 and day 5 to investigate the effect of paroxetine and quetiapine when combined with oxycodone compared to oxycodone alone. In addition, Read Rebreathing assessments will be performed on day 4 to determine the effect of paroxetine alone and quetiapine alone compared to placebo. There will be seven days of washout between each period. During each period, participants will perform the Read Rebreathing procedure 17 times, for a total of 51 rebreathing assessments in Part 2. For Part 2, blood samples will also be collected for determination of study drug concentration.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject signs an institutional review board (IRB) approved written informed consent and privacy language as per national regulations (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization) before any study related procedures are performed.
2. Subject is a healthy man or woman, 18 to 50 years of age, inclusive, who has a body mass index of 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2, inclusive, at Screening.
3. Subject has normal medical history findings, clinical laboratory results, vital sign measurements, 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) results, and physical examination findings at Screening or, if abnormal, the abnormality is not considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee).
4. Subject must have a negative test result for alcohol and drugs of abuse at Screening and Check-in (Day -1).
5. Subject has no known or suspected allergies or sensitivities to any of the study drugs.
6. Female subjects must be of non-childbearing potential or, if they are of childbearing potential, they must: 1) have been strictly abstinent for 1 month before Check in (Day -1) and agree to remain strictly abstinent for the duration of the study and for at least 1 month after the last application of study drug; OR 2) be practicing 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique) from at least 1 month before Check in (Day -1) until at least 1 month after the last application of study drug.
7. Male subjects must agree to practice 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique) from at least 1 month before Check in (Day -1) until at least 1 month after the last application of study drug.
8. Subject is highly likely (as determined by the investigator) to comply with the protocol defined procedures and to complete the study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subject has history of opioid or psychotropic drug use within 60 days of the start of the study.
2. Subject has non-reactive or misshapen pupil(s) or damaged orbit structure or surrounding soft tissue is edematous or has an open lesion.
3. Subject has a Mallampati intubation score of \>2 (for Part 1 and 2 only).
4. Subject Read Rebreathing data is of poor quality or subject does not agree to remain clean-shaven for all days when the Read Rebreathing procedure is being performed.
5. Subject has used any prescription or nonprescription drugs (including aspirin or \[non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs\] NSAIDs and excluding oral contraceptives and acetaminophen) within 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) or complementary and alternative medicines within 28 days before the first dose of study drug. This includes prescription or nonprescription ophthalmic drugs.
6. Subjects are currently participating in another clinical study of an investigational drug or are have been treated with any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the compound.
7. Subject has used nicotine-containing products (e.g., cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff) within 6 weeks of Screening.
8. Subject has consumed alcohol, xanthine containing products (e.g., tea, coffee, chocolate, cola), caffeine, grapefruit, or grapefruit juice within 48 h of dosing. Subjects must refrain from ingesting these throughout the study.
9. Subject has a history of sleep disorders, Panic Disorder, Panic Attacks, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, or any associated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnosis or condition.
10. Subject has any underlying disease or surgical or medical condition (e.g., cancer, human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], severe hepatic or renal impairment) that could put the subject at risk or would normally prevent participation in a clinical study. This includes subjects with any underlying medical conditions that the Investigator believes would put subjects at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The CDC lists cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunocompromised state from solid organ transplant, severe obesity, serious heart conditions, sickle cell disease, pregnancy, smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus as conditions that put subjects at increased risk. Additionally, the CDC lists asthma (moderate-to-severe), cerebrovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, hypertension, immunocompromised state or immune deficiencies, neurologic conditions such as dementia, liver disease, pulmonary fibrosis, thalassemia, overweight, type 1 diabetes mellitus as conditions that might put subjects at increased risk.
11. Subject has any signs or symptoms that are consistent with COVID-19 per CDC recommendations. These include subjects with fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell, sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or vomiting, or diarrhea may have COVID-19. In addition, the subject has any other findings suggestive of COVID-19 risk in the opinion of the investigator.
12. Subject tests positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by a molecular diagnostic test performed prior to admission.
13. Female subject is pregnant or lactating before enrollment in the study.
14. Subject has known or suspected allergies or sensitivities to any study drug.
15. Subject has clinical laboratory test results (hematology, serum chemistry) at Screening that are outside the reference ranges provided by the clinical laboratory and considered clinically significant by the investigator.
16. Subject has a positive test result at Screening for HIV 1 or 2 antibody, hepatitis C virus antibodies, or hepatitis B surface antigen.
17. Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures for blood sample collection because of poor tolerability or poor venous access.
18. Subject has a history of or currently has hypoventilation syndrome or sleep apnea and is on non-invasive ventilation.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Part 1 - Minute Ventilation at the 55 mm Hg End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Point (VE55) on Day 1 for Oxycodone Combined With Midazolam and Oxycodone Alone.
timeFrame: Part 1: 2 hour timepoint on treatment period Day 1
measure: Part 2 - Minute Ventilation at the 55 mm Hg End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Point (VE55) on Day 1 for Paroxetine or Quetiapine Combined With Oxycodone and Oxycodone Alone.
timeFrame: Part 2: 5 hour timepoint on Day 1
measure: Part 2 - Minute Ventilation at the 55 mm Hg End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Point (VE55) on Day 5 for Paroxetine or Quetiapine Combined With Oxycodone and Oxycodone Alone.
timeFrame: Part 2: 5 hour timepoint on Day 5
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Part 1 - Minute Ventilation at the 55 mm Hg End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Point (VE55) for Oxycodone, Midazolam, and Placebo.
timeFrame: Part 1: 2 hour timepoint on Day 1
measure: Part 2 - Minute Ventilation at the 55 mm Hg End Tidal Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Point (VE55) on Day 4 for Paroxetine, Quetiapine, and Placebo
timeFrame: Part 2: 5 hour timepoint on Day 4
measure: Part 1 - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Midazolam
timeFrame: Part 1: Day 1 at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hour
measure: Part 2 - Cmax of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Paroxetine or Quetiapine on Day 1
timeFrame: Part 2: Day 1 at 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 24 hour
measure: Part 2 - Cmax of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Paroxetine or Quetiapine on Day 5
timeFrame: Part 2: Day 5 at 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 24 hour
measure: Part 1 - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Midazolam
timeFrame: Part 1: Day 1 at 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hour
measure: Part 2 - AUC of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Paroxetine or Quetiapine on Day 1
timeFrame: Part 2: Day 1 at 0 (pre-dose), 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 24 hours
measure: Part 2 - AUC of Oxycodone Alone vs. in Combination With Paroxetine or Quetiapine on Day 5
timeFrame: Part 2: Day 5 on 0 (pre-dose), 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 24 hours
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: West Bend
country: United States
facility: Spaulding Clinical Research
state: Wisconsin
Study officials:
affiliation: Spaulding Clinical Research LLC
name: Carlos Sanabria, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Bailey PL, Andriano KP, Goldman M, Stanley TH, Pace NL. Variability of the respiratory response to diazepam. Anesthesiology. 1986 Apr;64(4):460-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198604000-00008.
citation: Bourke DL, Warley A. The steady-state and rebreathing methods compared during morphine administration in humans. J Physiol. 1989 Dec;419:509-17. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017883.
citation: Cohen R, Finn H, Steen SN. Effect of diazepam and meperidine, alone and in combination, on respiratory response to carbon dioxide. Anesth Analg. 1969 May-Jun;48(3):353-5. No abstract available.
citation: Forster A, Gardaz JP, Suter PM, Gemperle M. Respiratory depression by midazolam and diazepam. Anesthesiology. 1980 Dec;53(6):494-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198012000-00010.
citation: Geddes DM, Rudolf M, Saunders KB. Effect of nitrazepam and flurazepam on the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Thorax. 1976 Oct;31(5):548-51. doi: 10.1136/thx.31.5.548.
citation: Ladd LA, Kam PC, Williams DB, Wright AW, Smith MT, Mather LE. Ventilatory responses of healthy subjects to intravenous combinations of morphine and oxycodone under imposed hypercapnic and hypoxaemic conditions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 May;59(5):524-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02368.x.
citation: Power SJ, Morgan M, Chakrabarti MK. Carbon dioxide response curves following midazolam and diazepam. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Sep;55(9):837-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.9.837.
citation: Read DJ. A clinical method for assessing the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Australas Ann Med. 1967 Feb;16(1):20-32. doi: 10.1111/imj.1967.16.1.20. No abstract available.
citation: Rebuck AS. Measurement of ventilatory response to CO2 by rebreathing. Chest. 1976 Jul;70(1 Suppl):118-21. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.1_supplement.118. No abstract available.
citation: Rigg JR. Ventilatory effects and plasma concentration of morphine in man. Br J Anaesth. 1978 Aug;50(8):759-65. doi: 10.1093/bja/50.8.759.
citation: Sarton E, Teppema L, Dahan A. Sex differences in morphine-induced ventilatory depression reside within the peripheral chemoreflex loop. Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1329-38. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00017.
citation: van der Schrier R, Jonkman K, van Velzen M, Olofsen E, Drewes AM, Dahan A, Niesters M. An experimental study comparing the respiratory effects of tapentadol and oxycodone in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Dec 1;119(6):1169-1177. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex295.
citation: van der Schrier R, Roozekrans M, Olofsen E, Aarts L, van Velzen M, de Jong M, Dahan A, Niesters M. Influence of Ethanol on Oxycodone-induced Respiratory Depression: A Dose-escalating Study in Young and Elderly Individuals. Anesthesiology. 2017 Mar;126(3):534-542. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001505.
citation: Xu L, Chockalingam A, Stewart S, Shea K, Matta MK, Narayanasamy S, Pilli NR, Volpe DA, Weaver J, Zhu H, Davis MC, Rouse R. Developing an animal model to detect drug-drug interactions impacting drug-induced respiratory depression. Toxicol Rep. 2020 Jan 25;7:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.008. eCollection 2020.
citation: Kummer O, Hammann F, Moser C, Schaller O, Drewe J, Krahenbuhl S. Effect of the inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;67(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0893-3. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
citation: Rollins MD, Feiner JR, Lee JM, Shah S, Larson M. Pupillary effects of high-dose opioid quantified with infrared pupillometry. Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov;121(5):1037-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000384.
citation: Skulberg AK, Tylleskar I, Nilsen T, Skarra S, Salvesen O, Sand T, Loftsson T, Dale O. Pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of intramuscular and intranasal naloxone: an explorative study in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;74(7):873-883. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2443-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
citation: Florian J, van der Schrier R, Gershuny V, Davis MC, Wang C, Han X, Burkhart K, Prentice K, Shah A, Racz R, Patel V, Matta M, Ismaiel OA, Weaver J, Boughner R, Ford K, Rouse R, Stone M, Sanabria C, Dahan A, Strauss DG. Effect of Paroxetine or Quetiapine Combined With Oxycodone vs Oxycodone Alone on Ventilation During Hypercapnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Oct 11;328(14):1405-1414. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17735.