Clinical trial NCT02609750: WorkUp. Structured Care With Workplace Interventions to Improve Work Ability in Patients With Neck and/or Low Back Pain
Official title: WorkUp. Early Structured Care Including Workplace Interventions to Improve Work Ability in Patients With Neck and/or Back Pain. A Prospective Pare Wise Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care With One Year Follow up
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Back Pain
Neck Pain
Lead sponsor: Lund University
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Region Skane
name: Kronoberg County Council
name: Blekinge County Council Hospital
First posted: 2015-11-20
Enrollment: 364
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 67
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: WorkUp is a prospective cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. The main purpose is to investigate effects of early structured care based on screening of red flags (signs of serious medical conditions/disease), yellow flags (psychosocial factors, attitude to pain) and blue flags (workplace related factors) and including a workplace intervention according to the method "Convergence Dialogue Meetings" (CDM) for improving work ability, in comparison with treatment as usual, in patients with neck and/or back pain.

Detailed description: Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common reasons for sick leave in western countries. Identifying risk factors and predictors for a stable return to work (RTW ) is essential. An evidence-based safe care includes systems for detecting medical conditions with urgent need for care (red flags) and psycho-social risk factors (yellow flags). To maintain work ability, also requires different capacities related to work demands, (physical, mental and social) as well as work environment aspects covered by a "blue flag system".

Since motivation is assumed to drive and sustain human behaviour, patients with back pain seek health care when motivation reaches a threshold level. Patients want to be examined, get treatment and self-care advice to resume normal daily activities. This might lead to improved long-standing results in terms of health, function and work ability.

The investigators hypothesize that WorkUp, a timely tailor-made and evidence-based intervention leads to a faster recovery of health, function and RTW as compared to standard care. This includes the identification of both the patient's risk factors (red, yellow and blue flags) and motivational factors. Based on this screening, a structured tailored intervention will be offered. The WorkUp model comprise of evidence-based treatment and interaction between patient, health care and work place interventions.

The main purpose is to test WorkUp in a comparison study with treatment as usual (TAU) in primary health care (PHC).

Design: A prospective paire wise cluster randomized trial in PHC including a one year clinical follow-up and a three year register follow-up.

Intervention: Through a flow chart the investigators in detail specify the medical and work place interventions (all according to evidence-based guidelines). Red, yellow and blue flags, and motivational factors are identified in a screening investigation. The aim of the screening is to individually tailor the rehabilitation interventions. Physiotherapy interventions are based on a bio-psychosocial and cognitive behavioural therapy perspective. Behavioural medicine treatment principles will include careful examination and treatments such as advice to stay active, instructions, OMI, OMT, MDT. The investigators apply interventions based on ergonomics, motivational factors and work place changes according to Convergence Dialogue Meetings(CDM). CDM is a three step structured dialogue and meeting model supporting the patient, health care professionals and employer to summarize concrete suggestions to support a RTW .

TAU patients follow the PHC's standard schedule and procedures including the so called rehabilitation guarantee.

For each patient all treatment measures are recorded in a protocol.

A power analysis indicated that the investigators needed to recruit a minimum of 20 PHCs and 500 patients.

This type of structured routine primary care can facilitate an adequate treatment for patients with musculoskeletal pain and how to allocate sparse resources. If beneficial results emerge a structured implementation program will follow.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* acute and subacute neck and/or back pain (less than three months of duration)
* a working history of at least four weeks during the last year
* being at risk for sick leave according to the short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) (cut off \>40)
* if sickness absent \< 60 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

* identified abuse
* retirement pension
* ongoing acute medical treatment
* pregnancy

Primary outcomes:
measure: Work ability
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatment (3, 6, 12 months and 2 and 3 years)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Health-related quality of life
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatment (3, 6 and 12 months)
measure: Functional ability
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatment (3, 6 and 12 months)
measure: Pain (distribution and intensity)
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatment (3, 6 and 12 months)
measure: Physical and psycho-social work environment
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatment (3, 6 and 12 months)
measure: Patient´s satisfaction
timeFrame: Changes from baseline to after treatemnt (3, 6 and 12 months)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Dep of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, and FoU Kronoberg, Region Kronoberg
name: Birgitta EM Grahn, AssProfessor
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Axen I, Sennehed CP, Eek F, Stigmar K. Can a workplace dialogue impact the perceived influence of neck and/or backpain on everyday activities and performance at work? A secondary analysis from the randomized controlled trial WorkUp. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 15;23(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05812-w.
citation: Forsbrand MH, Turkiewicz A, Petersson IF, Sennehed CP, Stigmar K. Long-term effects on function, health-related quality of life and work ability after structured physiotherapy including a workplace intervention. A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (WorkUp) in primary care for patients with neck and/or back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):92-100. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1717081. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
citation: Forsbrand MH, Grahn B, Hill JC, Petersson IF, Post Sennehed C, Stigmar K. Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e021748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021748.
citation: Saha S, Grahn B, Gerdtham UG, Stigmar K, Holmberg S, Jarl J. Structured physiotherapy including a work place intervention for patients with neck and/or back pain in primary care: an economic evaluation. Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1003-1. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
citation: Sennehed CP, Holmberg S, Axen I, Stigmar K, Forsbrand M, Petersson IF, Grahn B. Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Pain. 2018 Aug;159(8):1456-1464. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001216.
citation: Forsbrand M, Grahn B, Hill JC, Petersson IF, Sennehed CP, Stigmar K. Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 21;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1449-9.