Clinical trial NCT06755203: Evaluating the Impact of Operating Room Simulations on Communication Skills and Patient Safety (EIORS-CPS)
Official title: Evaluating the Impact of Operating Room Simulations on Communication Skills and Patient Safety
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Conditions: Patient-Centered Care
Competency-Based Education
Keywords: Patient safety
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
Team communication
Stress management
Protocol adherence
Risk assessment
Operating room simulations
Lead sponsor: King Saud Medical City
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2025-01-01
Enrollment: 109
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 25
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: The study population includes medical students enrolled in the MEDI 045 course at King Saud University. These students are actively engaged in clinical education and exposed to scenarios requiring the development of communication skills and adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.

Key Characteristics:

Academic Level: Medical students introduced to clinical practices in anesthesia.

Training Context: Students participating in structured educational activities, such as logbook maintenance and simulation-based learning.

Sample Size: Approximately 109 students to ensure robust analysis of communication skills and logbook preferences.

Brief summary: Simulation-based training has emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing communication skills among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of operating room (OR) simulations on the development of communication skills for patient safety. The study focused on two key areas: the development of communication skills for patient-centered care and the role of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in enhancing communication and patient safety during simulations.

Detailed description: This study will provide valuable insights into student preferences for logbook formats in anesthesiology education, specifically within the MEDI 045 course. By comparing Excel sheet logbooks with traditional paper logbooks, it aims to elucidate how different documentation methods impact student engagement, satisfaction, and learning outcomes.

Understanding these preferences is crucial, as logbooks are not merely administrative tools but integral components of the educational experience that promote reflection, accountability, and skill development in clinical practice.

The findings will contribute to existing knowledge by identifying specific advantages and disadvantages of each format, highlighting the aspects that enhance or hinder student learning. Moreover, the research will inform curriculum designers and educators about effective strategies for logbook implementation, ultimately leading to improved educational tools that better align with students' needs

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must be medical students enrolled in the MEDI 045 course at King Saud University.

Must have prior exposure to basic patient safety and communication skills training.

Age: 18-25 years. Students must voluntarily consent to participate in the study and complete the required simulations and assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

Students who have already completed formal simulation-based training on communication or patient safety outside the MEDI 045 curriculum.

Students are unable to participate in simulation sessions due to scheduling conflicts or medical reasons.

Participants were unwilling to provide informed consent.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Improving Patient Safety Training through Simulation
timeFrame: 7-8 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Improvement in Communication Skills during Simulations
timeFrame: 7-8 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Riyadh
country: Saudi Arabia
facility: King Saud University , College of Medicine, Anesthesia Department
Study officials:
References: