Clinical trial NCT05122468: Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
Official title: The Use of a Connective Tissue Auto-graft in Combination With Either the Tunnel Technique or the Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Gingival Recession
Lead sponsor: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2021-11-16
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: The two intervention groups will be the CAF group (standard of care control) and Tunnel group (TUN, Test group). Two experienced clinicians (ML, or JG) will deliver treatment consisting of root coverage surgery using a coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft (Control group), or a tunnel technique (Test group) in combination with a connective tissue graft.

Follow-up of individual patients will be 6 months (to be extended to 3 years to observe differences in a long-term basis)
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Many studies have compared the tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single and multiple recessions. However, there is a lack of evidence that compared both techniques in combination with a connective tissue graft, for just multiple adjacent recessions. No technique is clearly superior to another in terms of complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage (MRC) and the gain of keratinized tissue height (KTH) when multiple recession coverage was evaluated. Moreover, as a connective tissue graft supposed to offer more stability in terms of complete root coverage in long-term basis, the main question should be aimed at the role of the sub-epithelial connective tissue graft, when it is used in combination with one technique or another. Hence, the hypothesis is focused on if the use of a connective tissue graft in combination with a tunnel technique would provide higher clinical outcomes and similar patient-based outcomes than its use in combination with the Coronally Advanced flap technique.

Detailed description: Parallel group, clinical evaluator- and statistician-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects with a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of four adjacent teeth with gingival recessions (at least one with a depth ≥ 3 mm) and requiring surgical intervention, without medical contraindications to elective surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Presence of untreated periodontitis
* Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from tooth brushing
* Interdental attachment loss greater than 1 mm or furcation involvement in the teeth to be treated
* Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant super-eruption
* Self-reported current smoking
* Presence of medical contraindications to elective surgery

Primary outcomes:
measure: Complete root coverage
timeFrame: 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Mean Root Coverage
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Recession Reduction (RR)
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Probing pocket depth (PPD)
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Clinical attachment Gain
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Width of Keratinized Tissue (KTW)
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Wound Healing Index (WHI)
timeFrame: 3 months
measure: Root Coverage Aesthetic Score (Ref)
timeFrame: 6 months
Other outcomes:
measure: Patient Concerns with Recession
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Time to recovery
timeFrame: 14 days
Locations:
city: Madrid
country: Spain
facility: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Study officials:
affiliation: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
name: Mariano Sanz, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):705-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565.
citation: Dastoor SF, Travan S, Neiva RF, Rayburn LA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Effect of adjunctive systemic azithromycin with periodontal surgery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1887-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070072.
citation: Gobbato L, Nart J, Bressan E, Mazzocco F, Paniz G, Lops D. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes after the application of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap or via a tunneling technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2191-2202. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1721-7. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
citation: Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
citation: Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):593-603. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.
citation: Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Cambra J, Gil J, Sanz M. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Apr;19(2):199-206.
citation: Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth. J Periodontol. 2005 Dec;76(12):2286-92. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2286.
citation: Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
citation: Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Petracci E, Montebugnoli L. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12224. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
citation: Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, de Sanctis M. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):728-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01550.x. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
citation: Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10.