Clinical trial NCT01742650: Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures
Official title: Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Study.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Trauma
Keywords: ankle; fracture; syndesmosis;
Lead sponsor: University of Oulu
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2012-12-05
Enrollment: 38
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 16
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition. All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are consecutively included into the study. The tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). Malposition of the tibiofibular joint is assessed in an intraoperative computed tomography. Clinical outcome is assessed by using Olerud-Molander, RAND ja 36-Item Healt Survey after 1-year from the injury.

Detailed description: The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Screw fixation is widely and mostly used transfixation but suture-button is also shown to be a biomechanically stable and probably more physiologic transfication method. It is shown that even 50 % of the syndesmosis srews and thus fibulas are in malposition. With more physiologic suture-button transfixation this malposition is thought to be less commmon. There is no studies comparing screw and suture-button syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture patients.

Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition assessed in the intraoperative computed tomography. Malposition is assessed to present if difference between fractured and non-fractured side is at least 2 mm in the tibiofibular joint. Thus, the sample size is assessed to be 19 patients per group (alpha=0.05, Beta=0.2, 20% drop out).

All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are included into the study. Exclusion criteria are previous ankle fracture, concomitant tibial fracture, diabetes with peripheral neuropathy, pathological fracture or inadequate co-operation.

After bony fixation the tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). An intraoperative computed tomography is imaged from the both ankles of all patients. The operation is continued with six weeks casting without weight-bearing.

Clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander scoring system, RAND 36-Item Health Survey, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure pain and function after a minimum 1-year of follow-up.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* AO/OTA Weber C ankle fracture, operation within 7 days from the injury

Exclusion Criteria:

* Bilateral or previous ankle fracture, tibial shaft fracture, diabetes wiht polyneuropathy, inadequate co-operation

Primary outcomes:
measure: Malreduction of the tibiofibular joint in the intraoperative computed tomography
timeFrame: 2 years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Clinical outcome one year after the injury
timeFrame: 2 year
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Oulu
country: Finland
facility: Oulu University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Oulu University Hospital
name: Tero HJ Kortekangas, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkila T, Lepojarvi S, Nortunen S, Ohtonen P, Katisko J, Pakarinen H. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.