Clinical trial NCT04987021: An Actual Use, Open-label Study Assessing Usability of Remote Assist to Program Cochlear Implant Recipients
Official title: An Actual Use, Prospective, Adaptive Design, Single Centre, Non-randomised, Open-label Study, Assessing Usability of Remote Assist When Used to Program Cochlear Implant Recipients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
Keywords: Cochlear Implant
Remote Programming
Tele-audiology
Tele-medicine
Lead sponsor: Cochlear
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2021-08-03
Enrollment: 15
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Brief summary: Clinical management of cochlear implant (CI) recipients involve programming, counselling, performance evaluation and habilitation. This requires the recipients to travel to the clinic for follow up appointments which can pose significant challenges for recipients, particularly those who live far away from the clinic. Remote Assist (RA) is a new solution that allows the clinician to make MAP and sound processor adjustments via the recipient's Nucleus Smart app (NSA) installed on their smart phone. With RA the clinician can also perform counselling using a video call directly via the NSA. As RA uses no specialized hardware and software that needs to be sent and retrieved back from the recipient, it has the potential to further improve the remote programming experience and convenience for both the recipient and the clinician.

Detailed description: Clinical management of cochlear implant (CI) recipients involve programming, counselling, performance evaluation and habilitation. The standard practice for this management involves frequent clinical visits in the first year after implantation and annual visits for the rest of the recipient's life. The need to travel to the clinic for follow up appointments can pose significant challenges for recipients, particularly those who live far away from the clinic. There have been reports of recipients being lost to follow up due to the difficulties in travelling to the clinic. The inconvenience of scheduling a session and travelling to the clinic might deter recipients from seeking help for some seemingly small / less troubling issues and increase their tendency to somehow bear and live with the issues. Sometimes clinicians schedule follow-up sessions with the primary purpose of following-up on progress with strategies provided earlier to overcome real world problems. Such follow-up on progress can easily be completed via a video call as well. Remote programming is one telehealth solution known to be successful in addressing the challenges of travelling to the clinic for appointments. During the Covid-19 pandemic there was a demonstrated increase in the uptake of remote programming when traveling to the clinic posed a health and safety risk. Current methods of remote programming of CI requires the use of special computer and programming hardware as well as proprietary programming software to be installed on a personal computer (PC) at the remote location. Although remote programming potentially reduces the travel burden for some recipients, it involves substantial administrative effort and cost by clinics to prepare, send, retrieve back, and clean remote programming hardware and software. This also reduces the frequency with which remote programming appointments can be scheduled due to time delays in sending and retrieving equipment. Remote Assist (RA) is a new solution that allows the clinician to make MAP and sound processor adjustments via the recipient's Nucleus Smart app (NSA) installed on their smart phone. With RA the clinician can also perform counselling using a video call directly via the NSA. As RA uses no specialized hardware and software that needs to be sent and retrieved back from the recipient, it has the potential to further improve the remote programming experience and convenience for both the recipient and the clinician.

The current study aims to assess recipients ease and experience with using Remote Assist to receive remote programming of their CI.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adults (≥18 years).
2. Implanted with the below cochlear implants in one or both ears. CI500 series (CI512, CI513, CI522, CI532,), CI600 series (CI612, CI622, CI632), Freedom series (CI24RE (ST), CI24RE (CA), CI24RE (CS), CI422).
3. At least 3 months experience with the cochlear implant.
4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
2. Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families; immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
3. Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organizations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
4. Currently participating or participated in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, or if less than 30 days the prior investigation was Cochlear sponsored and determined by the investigator to not impact clinical findings of this investigation.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Number of Participants Who While Using the Final Version of Remote Assist, Are Able to Complete the Primary Tasks (Score of 5 on the Usability Rating Scale)
timeFrame: Immediately after the participants´ first use of the Nucleus Smart App with Remote Assist Custom Sound Pro 6.3, on average half an hour after participants have completed all tasks.
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Sydney
country: Australia
facility: Cochlear Sydney In-house lab
state: New South Wales
Study officials:
References: