Clinical trial NCT06694584: Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff Through the Tea(m)Time Intervention
Official title: Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff: A Quasi-experimental, Quantitative Pre-post Intervention Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Resilience, Psychological
Personnel, Hospital
Lead sponsor: Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-11-19
Enrollment: 150
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Employees in hospitals are exposed to various stressors and can be at risk of psychological stress. To counteract this, resilience programs are increasingly being offered. Most interventions focus on individual resilience. In this study, the focus is on the resilience of teams. For this reason, this research paper will focus on the Tea(m)Time intervention. Tea(m)Time is a health promotion intervention that combines the risk assessment of mental stress with a focus on team resilience. In order to generate knowledge about the Tea(m)Time intervention, this study aims to identify factors that promote and inhibit its implementation and mediate its effectiveness. The aim is to gain insights into the promotion of resilience in teams. The aim is to conduct the survey of the participants in the intervention group and the control group at three different points in time.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria:

* be at least 18 years old
* have sufficient knowledge of German
* are not on sick leave at time t0
* work in one of the planned clinics

Exclusion criteria:

* be younger than 18 years old
* do not have sufficient knowledge of German
* are on sick leave at time t0
* do not work in one of the planned clinics

Primary outcomes:
measure: FITOR questionnaire (questionnaire on individual, team and organizational resilience)
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Psychological empowerment
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
measure: Instrument to Measure the Culture for Psychological Empowerment in Organizations (IMPEC)
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
measure: Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ-G) German version of the Organizational Commitment Questionaire
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
measure: Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II)
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
measure: Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10)
timeFrame: t0 baseline
measure: The questionnaire to record the willingness to change (FEVER)
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
measure: German standard version of the COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire)
timeFrame: t0 baseline, t1 6 months follow-up, t2 12 months follow-up
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Bad Kreuznach
country: Germany
facility: Klinik Viktoriastift Bad Kreuznach
city: Bad Kreuznach
country: Germany
facility: Geriatrische Fachklinik Rheinhessen-Nahe
city: Meisenheim
country: Germany
facility: Gesundheitszentrum Glantal
Study officials:
affiliation: Professorship for Psychology in Healthcare
name: Nadine Ungar, Dr.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: