Clinical trial NCT03140202: Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Quality Study (CILICA-QS)
Official title: Impact of a Feedback Device, CPRmeter®, on Chest Compression Quality Preservation During Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation: A Manikin Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Cardiac Arrest
Lead sponsor: University Hospital, Caen
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-05-04
Enrollment: 65
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: In Guide group, participants have a real time feedback (and record) on chest compression quality performed by means of the visuals informations profided by the feedback device.

In Blind group, participants have a real time record of chest compression quality performed by means of the feedback device without feedback information of the performance.
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: Context: Chest compressions quality is known to be essential in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Despite a known harmful effect of chest compressions interruptions, current guidelines still recommend provider switch every 2 minutes. Feedback impact on chest compressions quality preservation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains to be assessed.

Study design: simulated prospective monocentric randomized crossover trial.

Participants and methods: Sixty five professionals rescuers of the pre-hospital care unit of University Hospital of Caen (doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers) are enrolled to performed continuous chest compression on manikin (ResusciAnne®, Laerdal), twice, with and without a feedback device (CPRmeter®). Correct compression score (the main criterion) is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time (recorded continuously).

Hypothesis: Feedback device preserve chest compression quality above the 2 minutes recommended switch over during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Operational staff of University hospital of Caen pre-hospital unit
* Ability in CardioPulmonary Resuscitation

Exclusion Criteria:

* medical contraindication
* refusal

Primary outcomes:
measure: Correct compression score
timeFrame: Day 0
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Decrease time of 30% of correct compression score
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Chest compression depth
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Chest compression rate
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Percentage of chest compression without leaning
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Percentage of chest compression with correct depth
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Percentage of correct chest compression rate
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Participants' fatigue (Borg's scale)
timeFrame: Day 0
Other outcomes:
measure: Hemodynamic effect n1 of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
timeFrame: Day 0
measure: Hemodynamic effect n2 of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
timeFrame: Day 0
Locations:
city: Caen
country: France
facility: University Hospital of Caen
state: Normandy
Study officials:
affiliation: Medical Simulation Center Normandie Simulation en Sante
name: Clement BULEON, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: