Clinical trial NCT04413890: Comparison of Two Rhythm of Administration of Prostaglandin Gel for Induction of Labor
Official title: Administration of Prostaglandin Gel for Cervical Priming During Induction of Labour Every 12 Hours Versus 24 Hours: a Randomized Superiority Controlled Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Labor Complication
Cervix
Keywords: Induction
Term
Labor
Rhythm
Prostaglandins
Lead sponsor: University Hospital Center of Martinique
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-06-04
Enrollment: 268
Sex: FEMALE
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 49
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The study compares two rhythms of administration of prostaglandin vaginal gels for cervical priming before induction of labor in term patients. In our institution, prostaglandin gels are given for a maximum of three times, with induction by oxytocin and amniotomy the day after the last gel whatever Bishop score has been obtained. This management results in some patient spending four days in hospital before delivery. The aim of the study is to compare our classical management scheme with a reduced interval between to gels, of 12h instead of 24 h. The primary outcome will be the time elapsed between the first prostaglandin gel and delivery. Tolerance of both management patterns will also be evaluated through a satisfaction survey.

Detailed description: Approximatively 22% of pregnant women have an induction of labor in France (22.9% in our institution in 2019), mainly for prolonged pregnancy after 41 weeks gestational age or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients whose cervix is considered unripe (Bishop score under 6) are generally proposed a cervical priming because induction of labor without prior priming entails a higher of cesarean delivery rate for failed induction. The devices used for cervical priming are pharmacological (mainly prostaglandin gel, pessaries or suppositories) or mechanical (Foley catheter, Cook balloons). Very few recommendations exist regarding the type of device, the rhythm and maximal number of repeat administrations and the interval between two administrations. Shortening interval between two administrations (in case of use of a device necessitating serial prescriptions) may shorten the time interval between beginning of priming and delivery. In our institution, a vaginal gel can be given three times before induction of labor with oxytocin and amniotomy, whatever Bishop score has been obtained after priming. These gels are given on a daily basis. This rhythm implies than for some women not responding to a first gel, priming can last up to three days, lengthening hospital stay and leading to maternal weariness. Maternal satisfaction during induction of labor is seldom analyzed. An intensification in gel administration implies a change in maternal management during the induction process, with shortened periods of rest between two gels and nearer periods of pain and discomfort, albeit on a theoretically shorter period. The way patients deal with this new rhythm compared to the classical in part of the evaluation in this study. All patients having a singleton pregnancy and an indication for term (≥ 37 weeks gestation age) induction with an unfavorable cervix and no contraindication to vaginal delivery will be eligible. Patients with fetuses in breech presentation, a scarred uterus, under 18 years, bearing a fetus with antenatally known malformation, not fluent in French or presenting an allergy to prostaglandins will be excluded. A written informed consent will be required before inclusion. The primary outcome will be the duration between first priming with prostaglandin gel and delivery. Secondary outcomes will be the satisfaction of patients with their induction process (measured through a survey answered during the in-hospital post-partum stay), the rate of cesarean section, the rate of hypertonia/hypercinesia during priming and induction requiring medical intervention, the length of active phase of labor (after 5 cm of dilation), the oxytocin doses used during delivery for induction or augmentation, initial neonatal (Apgar score, arterial cord pH and lactates, resuscitation maneuvers, transfer to intensive care unit) and maternal (post-partum hemorrhage, hyperthermia during labor, perineal laceration \> 2nd degree and endometritis) morbidity and length of total hospital stay. The investigators calculated that a sample of 268 patients (134 in each group) will be necessary to detect a 30% reduction in duration between first priming and delivery in the experimental group (one gel every 12h) compared with the classical group. Mean time frame between first priming and delivery has been measured in our department in 2018 to 31.8 hours (standard deviation 27.6 hours).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients above 18 years
* Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
* With indicated induction of labor and initial Bishop score under 6
* Without any contraindication to vaginal delivery
* Who consent to participate to the clinical research
* With French Medical Public Insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

* Multiple pregnancy
* Previous uterine scar (for myomas or cesarean section)
* Fetus not in cephalic presentation
* Allergy to prostaglandins
* Who not consent to participate to the study

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time between gel administration and delivery
timeFrame: At inclusion (Day 0)
measure: Time between gel administration and delivery
timeFrame: At 12 hours or 24 hours (after each gel administration)
measure: Time between gel administration and delivery
timeFrame: Time 0 after the childbirth
measure: Time between gel administration and delivery
timeFrame: Until 5 days postpartum (during in-hospital postpartum period)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Maternal satisfaction
timeFrame: Until 5 days postpartum
measure: Cesarean section rate
timeFrame: During labor
measure: Hypertonia / hypercinesia rate
timeFrame: During priming and induction
measure: Oxytocin dose during labor
timeFrame: During labor
measure: Length of active first phase of labor
timeFrame: During labor
measure: Maternal morbidity
timeFrame: During labor
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
measure: Neonatal immediate morbidity
timeFrame: 5 minutes after childbirth
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Fort-de-France
country: Martinique
facility: University Hospital of Martinique
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospital of Martinique
name: Jean-Luc VOLUMENIE
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: