Clinical trial NCT04215250: Accuracy of CVC Depth Prediction in Internal Jugular Veins: The Difference Between The Andropoulos and ECG Methods
Official title: Accuracy of CVC Depth Prediction in Internal Jugular Veins: The Difference Between The Andropoulos and ECG Methods
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Depth of CVC Insertion
Lead sponsor: Indonesia University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-01-02
Enrollment: 72
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins: the difference between the andropoulos and ECG methods

Detailed description: seventy two subjects were given informed consent before the study started. compare the accuracy of CVC depth prediction in internal jugular veins with two difference methods, the andropoulos method and ECG method.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* signing informed consent form
* indicated for CVC insertion
* has no contraindication for right internal jugular vein CVC insertion

Exclusion Criteria:

* has history of arrhythmia
* has cardiac malformation history

Primary outcomes:
measure: CVC prediction depth using andropulous equation
timeFrame: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes:
measure: ECG change
timeFrame: 30 seconds
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Jakarta
country: Indonesia
facility: Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
state: DKI Jakarta
Study officials:
affiliation: Indonesia University
name: Aida R Tantri
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Wang L, Liu ZS, Wang CA. Malposition of Central Venous Catheter: Presentation and Management. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 20;129(2):227-34. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.173525. No abstract available.
citation: Chaskar V, Karnik PP, Dave NM, Garasia M. Comparative Study of Three Methods for Depth of Central Venous Catheter Placement in Children: An Observational Pilot Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018 Apr;46(2):116-120. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.32748. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
citation: Kwon HJ, Jeong YI, Jun IG, Moon YJ, Lee YM. Evaluation of a central venous catheter tip placement for superior vena cava-subclavian central venous catheterization using a premeasured length: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(2):e9600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009600.
citation: Sharma D, Singh VP, Malhotra MK, Gupta K. Optimum depth of central venous catheter - Comparision by pere's, landmark and endocavitory (atrial) ECG technique: A prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 May-Aug;7(2):216-20. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.118966.
citation: Na HS, Kim JT, Kim HS, Bahk JH, Kim CS, Kim SD. Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):820-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep078. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
citation: Kremser J, Kleemann F, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Optimized method for correct left-sided central venous catheter placement under electrocardiographic guidance. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):567-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer189. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
citation: Andropoulos DB, Bent ST, Skjonsby B, Stayer SA. The optimal length of insertion of central venous catheters for pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Oct;93(4):883-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00016.
citation: Struck MF, Schmidt T, Winkler BE, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Formulas for prediction of insertion depths of internal jugular vein catheters adjusted to body height categories. J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):191-4. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000488. Epub 2015 Dec 7.