Clinical trial NCT00000408: Low Back Pain Patient Education Evaluation
Official title: Evaluation of a Low Back Pain Patient Education Program
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Low Back Pain
Keywords: Health education
Back injury
Chronic pain
Education/evaluation planning
Outcomes research
Lead sponsor: Stanford University
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
First posted: 1999-11-04
Enrollment: 580
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Back pain is one of the most common of all symptoms. It is also a great cause of days lost from work and visits to health care providers. This study will develop and evaluate an approach to low back pain that allows subjects to talk with each other and with health professionals via an Internet discussion group. Results we will look at include health behaviors, such as exercise; health status, such as pain and disability; and health care use, such as number of visits to doctors and other health care providers. Anyone 18 years old or older who lives in the United States and has ongoing Internet access can take part in the study. All subjects must have back pain and meet the eligibility criteria listed below.

Detailed description: This study will develop and evaluate in a randomized trial a low back pain intervention that allows subjects to talk with each other and with health professionals via an Internet discussion group. The intervention consists of a book and a videotape and is based on interaction with other participants in the program and health professionals through a closed password protected moderated Internet discussion group. Outcome measures include health behaviors, such as exercise; health status, such as pain and disability; and health care use, such as number of visits to doctors and other health care providers. Patients will be randomized either to the treatment group and followed for 6, 12, 18, and 24 months with the intervention.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Must live in the United States
* Must understand and write English
* Must have access to a computer with e-mail and expect to have this access for at least 3 years
* Must be 18 years old
* Must have seen a doctor for back pain at least once in the past year

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnancy
* Back surgery in the past 6 months
* Expectation of having back surgery in the next 6 months
* Back pain due to a car accident or other major injury within the last 6 months
* Back pain or sciatica due to systemic disease (inflammatory rheumatic diseases, tumor, or other)
* Major physical or mental health condition for which one is currently being treated that severely limits daily activities
* Terminal illness
* Receiving disability or workers compensation insurance payments for back pain or sciatica
* Presently involved in legal proceedings because of back pain or sciatica
* Difficulty with bladder or bowel control that began with back pain or sciatica
* No visits to a doctor in the past year for back pain or sciatica
* Numbness in crotch area that began with back pain or sciatica
* Age under 18

Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Palo Alto
country: United States
facility: Stanford University
state: California
Study officials:
affiliation: Stanford University
name: Kate R. Lorig, Dr.P.H.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Lorig KR, Laurent DD, Deyo RA, Marnell ME, Minor MA, Ritter PL. Can a Back Pain E-mail Discussion Group improve health status and lower health care costs?: A randomized study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):792-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.7.792.
citation: Bruce B, Lorig K, Laurent D, Ritter P. The impact of a moderated e-mail discussion group on use of complementary and alternative therapies in subjects with recurrent back pain. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Sep;58(3):305-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.012.