Clinical trial NCT05585203: Contingency Management for Recovery Oriented Activities at Recovery Houses
Official title: Contingency Management for Recovery Oriented Activities at Recovery Houses
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Substance Use Disorders
Keywords: contingency management
Rural recovery houses
Lead sponsor: Wayne State University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-10-18
Enrollment: 120
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: A quasi-experimental design will be used. Half of the recovery houses residents will be randomly assigned to receive training in and to conduct contingency management. The other half will receive no additional training or interventions (usual care).
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: In this study, the investigators will implement contingency management at rural recovery houses, where individuals with substance use disorders reside. Contingency management is a behavioral intervention in which participants receive incentives (rewards) when they complete planned tasks that are consistent with their recovery efforts. House staff members will also participate in this study and will be trained to provide contingency management to residents. The investigators will compare recovery houses that implement contingency management to matched houses that do not, and the main outcomes will be engagement in the planned activities and retention in the recovery houses. Participants will receive contingency management for up to 12 weeks and follow-up will occur 6 months post-treatment.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 18 or older;
2. a resident of the recovery house; and
3. able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. expected to be discharged from the recovery house in the next two months;
2. experiencing uncontrolled mania, psychosis or suicidality.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Treatment retention
timeFrame: Time until leaving the recovery home from study baseline up to one year
measure: Engagement in recovery-oriented activities
timeFrame: up to 12 week treatment
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Treatment Satisfaction
timeFrame: Post-treatment (Week 12)
measure: Quality of Life Assessment
timeFrame: Baseline, post-treatment (week 12) and 6-month follow up
measure: Self-Reported Health
timeFrame: Baseline, post-treatment (week 12) and 6-month follow up
measure: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9
timeFrame: Baseline, post-treatment (week 12) and 6-month follow up
measure: Substance Use
timeFrame: Baseline, weekly for 12 weeks, post-treatment (week 12) and 6-month follow up
measure: Timeline Follow-back for substance use
timeFrame: Baseline, weekly for 12 weeks, post-treatment (week 12) and 6-month follow up
measure: Treatment Feasibility
timeFrame: Baseline
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Detroit
country: United States
facility: Wayne State University School of Medicine
state: Michigan
Study officials:
References:
citation: Frisch, M.B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M. & Retzlaff, P.J. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92-101.
citation: Novy, D.M., Nelson, D.V., Goodwin, J. & Rowzee, R.D. (1993). Psychometric comparability of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for different ethnic subpopulations. Psychological Assessment, 5, 343-349.
citation: Petry NM, Alessi SM, Ledgerwood DM. A randomized trial of contingency management delivered by community therapists. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr;80(2):286-98. doi: 10.1037/a0026826. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
citation: Petry NM, Alessi SM, Ledgerwood DM. Contingency management delivered by community therapists in outpatient settings. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.015. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
citation: Petry NM, Alessi SM, Ledgerwood DM, Sierra S. Psychometric properties of the contingency management competence scale. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.027. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
citation: Petry NM, Martin B, Finocche C. Contingency management in group treatment: a demonstration project in an HIV drop-in center. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Sep;21(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00184-2.
citation: Rash CJ, Petry NM, Kirby KC, Martino S, Roll J, Stitzer ML. Identifying provider beliefs related to contingency management adoption using the contingency management beliefs questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Mar 1;121(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.027. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
citation: Shapiro, S.S. & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52.3/4, 591-611.
citation: Sobell, L.C., & Sobell, M.B. (1992). Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In R.Z. Litten and J.P. Allen (eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods (pp. 41-72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
citation: Yi R, Johnson MW, Giordano LA, Landes RD, Badger GJ, Bickel WK. THE EFFECTS OF REDUCED CIGARETTE SMOKING ON DISCOUNTING FUTURE REWARDS: AN INITIAL EVALUATION. Psychol Rec. 2008 Spring;58(2):163-174. doi: 10.1007/BF03395609.
citation: Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
citation: Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.