Clinical trial NCT02636504: Evaluation of Three Pulp Vitality Tests
Official title: Evaluation of Three Pulp Vitality Tests
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Conditions: Dental Pulp Diseases
Dental Pulp Vitality Testing
Keywords: Pulp vitality
Pulp testing
Lead sponsor: Columbia University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-12-21
Enrollment: 150
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients that need endodontic treatment will have a consultation visit first. In most cases, the endodontic treatment will be provided at a subsequent visit. In some cases the endodontic treatment will be provided at the same visit. Patients who present to the endodontic clinic for a consultation visit for endodontic treatment. The patient will have three types of pulp vitality tests done on the tooth that is to receive endodontic treatment.

Brief summary: The objectives of this study are to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining the vitality of teeth and comparing with those of electric pulp testing and cold testing.

Detailed description: Prior to starting any endodontic treatment, it is essential to determine the vitality of the tooth in question. Vitality of a tooth is defined as the presence of blood flow into the tooth. The vitality status of a tooth will affect the success of endodontic treatment, and therefore plays an important role in treatment planning. Two established methods of determining vitality are electric pulp tests and cold tests. However, both these methods have drawbacks. Both methods use the presence of sensory feedback in the tooth as a predictor of tooth vitality. This can lead to errors because blood flow and nerves in the tooth may be lost at different times, resulting in false-positive and false-negative responses. Both are subjective and patient-dependent, relying on the patient to indicate when pain is felt. In addition, studies have suggested that electric pulp testing and cold tests are not as reliable in immature teeth, teeth undergoing orthodontic movement, traumatized teeth, and teeth with significant secondary dentin. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a technique that utilizes the Doppler principle to determine blood flow. It has been used widely in the medical field to measure blood flow in the skin. Some studies have also shown good results in measuring blood flow in the pulp of teeth. The objectives of this study are to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of laser Doppler flowmetry in determining the vitality of teeth and comparing with those of electric pulp testing and cold testing.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Criteria for inclusion in the study will be that the individual has teeth that require endodontic treatment and patient is willing to undergo two additional vitality tests which will take about 20 minutes of additional time.

Exclusion Criteria:

* No group of special subjects or vulnerable population is being targeted in this study.

Primary outcomes:
measure: The number of teeth showing the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative after pulp vitality testing
timeFrame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Columbia University College of Dental Medicine
name: Sahng G Kim, DDS, MS
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Karayilmaz H, Kirzioglu Z. Comparison of the reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry, pulse oximetry and electric pulp tester in assessing the pulp vitality of human teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 May;38(5):340-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02160.x. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
citation: Chen E, Abbott PV. Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, and repeatability of five dental pulp tests. J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Sep 9.