Clinical trial NCT06176950: History of Neonatology
Official title: History of Neonatology
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Conditions: Oral History
Lead sponsor: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-12-20
Enrollment: 15
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: OTHER
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: individuals who have worked in NICUs \[neonatologists, nurses, social workers\] in the 20th and/or early 21st century

Brief summary: This study traces the history of neonatology in the United States from the 1960s to the present with particular attention to the ways in which neonatologists developed criteria to make treatment decisions. I will be using oral history interviews as one source for a book that will document developments in the history of neonatology. I will identify potential research subjects through their publications in the field of neonatology and through word of mouth. I will locate them via the contact information provided in their publications or through an internet search.

Detailed description: I will interview individuals who have worked in NICUs \[neonatologists, nurses, social workers\] to understand how technological changes and changing scientific understanding influenced decision making pertaining to the treatment of infants. The interviews will supplement my extensive research of the medical literature and other pertinent publications.

Between the 1960s and the present, we have seen the emergence of medical therapies and technologies developed to treat neonates. Over this time period, there has also been a changing and growing understanding of the long-term impact that medical interventions have on the infants treated as well as on their families. Finally, the demographic characteristics of neonates have also changed as public health crises as well as the development of modern reproductive technologies led to new patient populations and new expectations of what NICUs should or should not achieve. I am interested in the ways in which these changes have led to evolving treatment criteria for neonates and ways in which neonatologists decided when to treat and when treatment was considered futile. I will interview medical professionals who are working or have worked at NICUs about the changes they experienced in their place of work over the course of their careers, the impact that medical technologies and changing patient populations had on considerations about treatment options, and the discussions they had with colleagues and the parents of patients.

There is to date no sustained historical analysis of neonatology. There are anthropological studies of the development of fetal surgery \[Casper 1998\] as well as Assisted Reproductive Technologies \[Spar, 2006; Thompson, 2005\]. There are analyses of the social history of particular medical interventions \[abortion, birth control, etc.\] \[Schoen, 1995; Schoen 2005\] and the treatment of the fetus \[Withycombe, 2019\]. And scholars have discussed the value of reproduction and the fetus as it pertains to emerging technologies of genetic testing and the history of disability \[Davis, 2019; Herzog, 2018; Lowy, 2018; Maienschein, 2003; Maienschein, 2014; Rapp, 2000; Reagan, 2010.\] This study will contribute to our understanding of the ways in which medical professionals have made decisions about life, death, and the quality of life of those being treated.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria: I will interview individuals who worked or are working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units as neonatologists, pediatricians, nurses, social workers or other pertinent professionals in the medical or counseling field.

Exclusion Criteria: N/A

-

Primary outcomes:
measure: Information about the history of neonatology
timeFrame: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: New Brunswick
country: United States
facility: Rutgers University
state: New Jersey
Study officials:
affiliation: Johanna Schoen
name: Johanna Schoen, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: