Clinical trial NCT03701269: Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Nonunion
Official title: Long-term Radiographic and Clinic Surgical Outcomes of Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Nonunion
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Conditions: Orthopedic
Keywords: Fracture
Lead sponsor: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2018-10-10
Enrollment: 10
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: CASE_ONLY
Time perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Using arthroscopic or open fixation combined with bone graft surgery for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion

Brief summary: The treatment for scaphoid proximal pole nonunion remains challenging due to the poor vascularity in the proximal pole fragment, associated SL injury and the technique of fixation. Vascularized bone grafts and non-vascularized iliac bone graft have been used in patients with scaphoid proximal pole nonunion, but the indication has not been well clarified. Alternatively, we have been treating such patients with vascularized bone graft , or non-vascularized bone graft with screw or k-wire fixation with considerable success. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze retrospectively the surgical efficacy of our procedure.

Detailed description: Scaphoid nonunion are common and operative treatment with bone graft was reported to have good result. However, the treatment for proximal pole nonunion remains controversial. There are some patterns of pathoanatomy combined with scaphoid fracture, like SL ligament tears, which could not be easily identified or treated initially. The proximal pole nonunion was near SL joint. Therefore, proximal pole nonunion may result in DISI instability. Furthermore, proximal pole nonunion was identified as a poor prognostic factor in scaphoid nonunion.

In the past 10 years, we have some different technique, like VBG, arthroscopic bone graft to achieve good results. Some studies revealed that significantly better SL stability was achieved with ARASL. We also used ARASL with BG to improve proximal pole union. However, it is not clear which method would be appropriate for proximal pole nonunion. We retrospectively investigated the functional outcome and radiological results after at least 2-year follow-up to clarify the surgical efficacy of these procedures.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* (1) chronic nonunion (wrist pain for more than 3 months after injury) as defined by preoperative radiographs; and (2) combined positive SL instability measured by intraoperative arthroscopy exam test; (3) Grade I SNAC.

Exclusion Criteria:

* (1) skeletally immature patients; (2) previous wrist trauma or surgery.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score
timeFrame: averaged 2 years
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Radiographic examination
timeFrame: averaged 2 years
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Taipei
country: Taiwan
facility: Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
name: Jung-Pan Wang, M.D.,ph.D
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: