Clinical trial NCT01876472: Differences in Music Perception Skills Between Child, Teen and Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
Official title: Differences in Music Perception Skills Between Child, Teen and Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Cochlear Implant Recipients
Lead sponsor: University of Zurich
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2013-06-12
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 3
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Healthy CI recipients that receive their regular follow-ups in the ENT-clinic of the Zurich University Hospital.

Brief summary: Adult recipients of cochlear implants (CI) generally loose interest in listening to music. This may be due to the rather limited spectral resolution of CI. However, child CI-recipients, if offered the opportunity, like to listen to music. They participate actively in musical acitivities, such as singing, dancing or playing an instrument. Thus, there seems to be a fundamental difference in the music perception of people who receive CI as child or as adult.

This study assesses music perception skills of child, teen and adult cochlear implant recipients in settings with simple tone sequences and in a more complex, melodious context.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria:

* Participants are uni- or bilateral CI recipients.
* Participants are at least 3 years old.
* Participants received CI one or more years before.
* Participants are healthy.
* Participation in the study is voluntary.
* Participants and their legal custodians have read the information for participants at least one day prior to the test and given their written consent.

Exclusion criteria:

* Surgery for CI carried out less than one year before the test.
* Children less than 3 years old.
* Reduced cognitive capabilities due to old age.
* Physical or mental handicaps.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Does the age at which a person receives a cochlear implant influence music perception skills?
timeFrame: Test and retest are taken within 6 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Do the results of the primary outcome measure depend on the tone sequence presented to the cochlear implant recipients?
timeFrame: Test and retest are no more than 6 months apart
Other outcomes:
measure: How can the findings of the primary and the secondary outcome measure be used to improve music perception with existing cochlear implants?
timeFrame: 6 months
Locations:
city: Zurich
country: Switzerland
facility: University Hospital Zurich,
state: ZH
Study officials:
affiliation: University Hospital Zurich, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
name: Dorothe Veraguth, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2000 Mar;11(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00231.
citation: Nicholas JG, Geers AE. Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6.
citation: Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33. doi: 10.1159/000078392.
citation: Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jul;108(7 Pt 1):634-40. doi: 10.1177/000348949910800702.
citation: Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2155-64. doi: 10.1121/1.1506688.
citation: Peretz I, Hyde KL. What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Aug;7(8):362-367. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00150-5.
citation: Fitzsimons M, Sheahan N, Staunton H. Gender and the integration of acoustic dimensions of prosody: implications for clinical studies. Brain Lang. 2001 Jul;78(1):94-108. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2448.
citation: Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
citation: K. Gfeller, S. A. Witt, L. J. Spencer, J. Stordahl and B. Tomblin (1999), Musical Involvement and Enjoyment of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants, Volta Review, 100(4), pp. 213-233
citation: Mitani C, Nakata T, Trehub SE, Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Takasaki K, Miyamoto I, Takahashi H. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):29S-33S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031547a.
citation: Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787.
citation: Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010.
citation: Looi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol. 2010 Feb;49(2):116-28. doi: 10.3109/14992020903405987.
citation: Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002 Mar;3(1):29-53. doi: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29.
citation: Trehub SE, Cohen AJ, Thorpe LA, Morrongiello BA. Development of the perception of musical relations: semitone and diatonic structure. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Aug;12(3):295-301. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.3.295.