Clinical trial NCT01655264: Evaluation of the Gertner Tele-Motion-Rehabilitation System for Stroke Rehabilitation
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial of Gertner Tele-Motion-Rehabilitation
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Stroke
Keywords: Stroke
Tele-health
Rehabilitation
Intervention
Gesture recognition system
Lead sponsor: Sheba Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER_GOV
First posted: 2012-08-01
Enrollment: 24
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The overall goal of the study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a home-based tele-motion-rehabilitation (TMR) program in improving functional status of people who had stroke. We hypothesize that the clinical effectiveness within a mock-up set up in the hospital of the TMR will be greater in comparison to self-training exercise carried out at home in improving outcomes of Range of Motion and functional performance of the weak upper extremity.

Twenty-four subjects who had a stroke, aged between 18 and 80 years, and living at home will participate. Subjects will be 2-72 months post stroke, and no longer receiving rehabilitation as in or out patient. They will have moderate impairment of the affected upper extremity determined by range of motion (ROM). Subjects will be evaluated for motor and cognitive abilities for a total of 5-6 hours by a skilled therapist who will be blind to group's assignment of the subjects. The evaluations will be repeated 3 times, once before the intervention commences, once immediately following the intervention and once four weeks after the intervention.

Subjects will be randomized into the two groups (TMR versus self-training treatment) with matching for level of impairment of the upper extremity by a person who is not part of the study. Each subject will receive twelve 45-60 min sessions over 4 weeks while seated. The control group will receive self-training exercises that are based on conventional therapy using principles of motor control and will include training of upper extremity movements in order to achieve better use of the affected arm in ADL. The experimental group will receive TMR treatment of comparable duration and intensity to those in the conventional treatment group with remote online monitoring by the therapist. Treatment feedback will be given in the form of Knowledge of results (game scores) and Knowledge of performance (feedback of compensatory movements made while using the upper extremity) to enhance motor learning. The software will generate a report which will include the duration and type of exercises performed by the subject.

The Gertner TMR system is implemented via Microsoft's Kinect three-dimensional) camera-based gesture recognition technology. Using the patient's natural hand and body movements control all activity within customized computer games. The system runs off a standard desktop computer and is displayed on a large television screen.

Detailed description: Telerehabilitation refers to the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to provide rehabilitation services to people remotely in their homes or other environments. By using ICT, patient access to care can be improved and the reach of clinicians can extend beyond the physical walls of a traditional healthcare facility, thus expanding continuity of care to persons with disabling conditions. Telerehabilitation holds significant potential to meet this need and to provide services that are more accessible to more people, while having the ability to offer a more affordable enhanced level of care.

The overall goal of the study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a home-based tele-motion-rehabilitation (TMR) program in improving functional status of people who had stroke. We hypothesize that the clinical effectiveness within a mock-up set up in the hospital of the TMR will be greater in comparison to self-training exercise carried out at home in improving function of the weak upper extremity and performance of Activities of Daily Living.

Twenty-four subjects who had a stroke (as verified via CT or MRI), aged between 18 and 80 years, and living at home with a caregiver will participate. Subjects will be 2-72 months post stroke, and no longer receiving rehabilitation as in or out patient. They will have moderate impairment of the affected upper extremity determined by range of motion (ROM); shoulder flexion and abduction must be more than 45 degrees with mild to moderate compensations; elbow flexion should be about 30 degrees. Measures used to characterize their level of ability include: NIH Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Sensory evaluation (light touch, extinction, stereognosis, proprioception), and the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS); these will not be used as study outcome measures.

The subjects will be evaluated over 2 sessions on different days for a total of 5-6 hours. The second session will include the setting of treatment goals for either treatment condition. Primary outcome measures will include Range of Motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow and trunk, the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), and the Motor Activity Log (MAL). Secondary outcome measures will include the Functional Reach Test (FRT) (in sitting and standing), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain evaluation, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Responses to the tele game activities will be monitored by using the following tool: BORG scale of perceived effort, Short Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ), Tele-game scores, and arm and trunk 3-Dimensional kinematics; these will not be used as outcome measures.

Subjects will be randomized into the two groups (12 in tele and 12 in self-training treatment) such that the two groups will be matched for level of impairment of the upper extremity. Each subject will receive twelve 45-60 min sessions (3 sessions per week for 4 weeks) of one of two types of treatment while seated. The control group will receive self-training exercises that are based on conventional therapy using principles of motor control and will include training of upper extremity movements in order to achieve better use of the affected arm in ADL. Each subject will receive a list of exercises to be performed in his home using a stand-alone poster as targets for the movements. In addition, each subject will be asked to write the dates and duration of time he/she did the each exercise. They will be in contact with a therapist once a week to monitor the self training program and adjust the level of exercise.

The experimental group will receive tele-rehabilitation treatment of comparable duration and intensity to those in the conventional treatment group. However, the treatment will be delivered via the Gertner Tele-Motion Rehabilitation system with remote online monitoring by the therapist. Treatment feedback will be given in the form of Knowledge of results (game scores) and Knowledge of performance (feedback of compensatory movements made while using the upper extremity) to enhance motor learning. The software will generate a report which will include the duration and type of exercises performed by the subject. If needed, a personal attendant may provide physical support in the tele home mock-up room.

The Gertner Tele-Motion-Rehabilitation system is implemented via Microsoft's Kinect three-dimensional) camera-based gesture recognition technology without any additional accessories (i.e., with no need for head mounted helmets or gloves). Using the patient's natural hand and body movements control all activity within customized computer games. The system runs off a standard desktop computer and is displayed on a large television screen. The patient may see himself (whole body or hands) within the virtual environment or may only see virtual objects that he is manipulating.

Each subject meeting the inclusion criteria will sign an informed consent. Subjects will be randomly assigned into one of two groups by a person who is not part of the study. Each subject will be assessed with the outcome tests listed above by a skilled therapist who will be blind to group's assignment of the subjects. The evaluations will be repeated 3 times, once before the intervention commences, once immediately following the intervention and once four weeks after the intervention.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Stroke (as verified via CT or MRI), 2- 72 months post event
* Moderate impairment of the affected upper extremity
* Preserved capacity for ambulation without or with an assistive device (e.g., walker, cane) or orthotics (e.g. AFO) (FIM of 6 indoors)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Other medical conditions limiting participation in a low-intensity exercise training
* Major receptive aphasia or inability to follow 2-stage commands and screening criteria consistent with dementia (Mini-Mental State score \<24)
* Untreated major depression
* Presence of unilateral spatial neglect as determined by star cancellation (score less than 51)
* Hemianopsia
* Apraxia (limb and ideomotor)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Range of Motion (ROM) of shoulder and elbow
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-7)
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Motor Activity Log (MAL)
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Functional Reach Test (FRT)
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) upper extremity sub-test
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)for pain evaluation
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
measure: Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
timeFrame: Change from baseline following four week intervention
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Ramat Gan
country: Israel
facility: Sheba Medical Center
Study officials:
affiliation: Gertner Institute
name: Mordechai Shani, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Barreca SR, Stratford PW, Lambert CL, Masters LM, Streiner DL. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017.
citation: Borg G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990;16 Suppl 1:55-8. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1815.
citation: Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000 Mar;16(1):22-8. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005.
citation: Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 May;74(5):531-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-u.
citation: Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
citation: Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;72(2):84-9. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199304000-00005.
citation: Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(3):243-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280801927830.
citation: Kizony R, Katz N, Rand D, Weiss PL. A Short Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) to enhance client-centered participation in virtual environments. Proceedings of 11th Annual Cybertherapy 2006.
citation: Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int. 1985;5(4):145-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00541514.
citation: Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
citation: Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M, Kleban MH. A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. J Gerontol. 1982 Jan;37(1):91-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.1.91.
citation: Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;82(6):750-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183.
citation: Ogon M, Krismer M, Sollner W, Kantner-Rumplmair W, Lampe A. Chronic low back pain measurement with visual analogue scales in different settings. Pain. 1996 Mar;64(3):425-428. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00208-1.
citation: Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) (University of Kansas, 2008, http://www2.kumc.edu/coa/ SIS/SIS_pg2.htm
citation: Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006 Oct 10;67(7):1189-94. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
citation: Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989 May;104(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4886(89)80005-6.