Clinical trial NCT06894784: A Clinical Trial to Evaluate The Effects of Semaglutide and Empagliflozin Combined to Automated Insulin Delivery on Diabetes Control in Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes
Official title: Semaglutide And Empagliflozin Combination Therapy Added To Automated Insulin Delivery In Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (SEMPA)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Diabetes Type 1
Keywords: T1D
Combination Therapy
Automated Insulin Delivery
SGLT2-i
GLP1-RA
Insulin
Artificial Pancreas
GLP-1 receptor agonist
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Lead sponsor: McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Diabetes Canada
First posted: 2025-03-25
Enrollment: 36
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Intervention model description: 2×2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial assessing the effects of Semaglutide and Empagliflozin, individually and combined, added to AID therapy.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Empagliflozin and Semaglutide, individually and combined, added to Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) works to improve time-in-range in adults living with Type 1 Diabetes. It will also evaluate the safety of Empagliflozin and Semaglutide in this context.

The primary hypothesis of this study is :

- The combination therapy of semaglutide and empagliflozin will increase time-in-range compared to placebo when added to AID therapy.

The secondary hypotheses are :

* The combination therapy of semaglutide and empagliflozin will increase time-in-range compared to semaglutide alone when added to AID therapy.
* The combination of semaglutide and empagliflozin will increase time-in-range compared to empagliflozin alone when added to AID therapy.

In this study, the research team will compare Empagliflozin and Semaglutide to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if they improve time-in-range.

This study has four groups:

Group 1: semaglutide injection + empagliflozin tablet. Group 2: semaglutide injection + placebo tablet. Group 3: placebo injection + empagliflozin tablet. Group 4: placebo injection + placebo tablet.

This is a 2x2 factorial crossover study. This means that all participants will undergo both injection intervention (placebo and semaglutide) arms. Within each injection arm, participants will take both tablets (placebo and empagliflozin). By the end of the study, every participant will have taken part in each study group.

Detailed description: This study is designed as a 2x2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial to investigate the effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin, individually and combined, on time-in-range (TIR) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using automated insulin delivery (AID) systems.

1. Study Design and Randomization:

   Factorial Design: The 2x2 factorial design allows for the simultaneous assessment of two interventions (semaglutide and empagliflozin) and their interaction. This design efficiently explores the individual and combined effects of the drugs. Randomization: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to determine the order of the semaglutide and placebo injections (Arm A: semaglutide first, Arm B: placebo first). Within each arm, the order of empagliflozin and placebo tablets will also be randomized 1:1. This ensures that any potential carryover effects are minimized. Double-Blind: Both participants and investigators will be blinded to the treatment assignments, minimizing bias in data collection and analysis. Crossover Design: Each participant will receive all four treatment combinations (semaglutide + empagliflozin, semaglutide + placebo, placebo + empagliflozin, placebo + placebo), allowing for within-subject comparisons and reducing inter-individual variability.
2. Study Procedures:

   Screening and Baseline: Participants will undergo a screening visit to confirm eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, medical history, and current diabetes management, will be collected. Titration Period (Semaglutide): A 12-week titration period for semaglutide will be implemented to achieve a stable dose and minimize gastrointestinal side effects. This gradual dose escalation will follow standard clinical practice. Intervention Periods (Four Weeks Each): Each participant will undergo four four-week intervention periods, representing the four treatment combinations. During each intervention period, participants will continue to use their AID system.

   Participants will receive daily injections (semaglutide or placebo) and daily tablets (empagliflozin or placebo) according to the randomization schedule. Washout Periods: A two to four-week washout period will be implemented between the semaglutide/placebo arms to eliminate any carryover effects of semaglutide. A one to seven-day washout period will be implemented between the empagliflozin/placebo tablet administrations. This short period is considered sufficient for the elimination of empagliflozin. CGM Data Collection:

   Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data will be collected throughout the study, with a focus on the four-week intervention periods. CGM data will be used to calculate the primary outcome (TIR) and secondary outcomes. Questionnaires: At the end of each four-week intervention period, participants will complete questionnaires to assess: Diabetes distress and treatment satisfaction. Adverse Event Monitoring: Adverse events will be recorded throughout the study, from informed consent to the end of participation.
3. Statistical Analysis:

   Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis: Statistical analyses will be performed on an ITT basis, including all participants who were randomized. Factorial Analysis: The factorial design allows for the assessment of the main effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin, as well as their interaction. Mixed-Effects Models: Mixed-effects models will be used to account for repeated measures and within-subject variability. Descriptive Statistics: Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics and outcome measures. Adverse Event Analysis: Adverse events will be summarized and analyzed for frequency and severity.
4. Safety Considerations:

Participants will be closely monitored for adverse events. Rescue medications will be available for hypoglycemic events. Participants will receive education on the safe use of semaglutide, empagliflozin, and the AID system. The investigators will have the right to remove any participant from the study at any time if they feel it is in the best interest of the participant.

Eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria at the time of enrollment are:

* Males and females aged 18 or older.
* Clinical diagnosis of T1D for at least one year.
* Use of AID system for at least three months.
* Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 23 kg/m2.

The exclusion criteria are:

* Use of GLP1-RA within one month of admission.
* Use of SGLT2i within two weeks of admission.
* Planned or ongoing pregnancy.
* Breastfeeding.
* Severe hypoglycemic episode within three months of admission (defined as an event where blood glucose levels were \< 4.0 mmol/L, resulting in seizure, loss of consciousness, or the need to present to the emergency department).
* Diabetic ketoacidosis episode within six months of admission.
* History of acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, or gallbladder disease.
* Personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.
* Severe impairment of renal function with an eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 within four months of admission. eGFR will be computed using the CKD-EPI method.
* Clinically significant diabetic retinopathy or gastroparesis, as per the investigator's judgement.
* Bariatric surgery within six months of admission.
* A serious medical or psychiatric illness that would likely interfere with participation in this study, as per the investigator's judgement.
* Inability or unwillingness to comply with safe diabetes management practices, as per the investigator's judgment.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Time-in-Range
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Overall Time In Range
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Optimal Time In Range
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Time In Hypoglycemia
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Time In Mild Hyperglycemia
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Time Above Range
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Time In Severe Hyperglycemia
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Total Insulin dose
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Basal insulin dose
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Bolus insulin dose
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Carbohydrate intake
timeFrame: At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention.
measure: Patient-reported outcomes
timeFrame: At the end of each intervention at weeks 16, 21, 29, 34
measure: Patient-reported outcomes
timeFrame: At the end of each intervention at weeks 16, 21, 29, 34
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Montréal
country: Canada
facility: Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
state: Quebec
Study officials:
affiliation: Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center
name: Dr. Michael Tsoukas
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center
name: Dr. Melissa-Rosina Pasqua
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center
name: Dr. Vanessa Tardio
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering - McGill University
name: Dr. Ahmad Haidar
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Cohen E, Tsoukas MA, von Oettingen JE, Yale JF, Garfield N, Vallis M, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Alleviate Carbohydrate Counting in Type 1 Diabetes with Automated Fiasp and Pramlintide Closed-Loop Delivery. New Orleans: American Diabetes Association Conference; 2022.
citation: Haidar A, Lovblom LE, Cardinez N, Gouchie-Provencher N, Orszag A, Tsoukas MA, Falappa CM, Jafar A, Ghanbari M, Eldelekli D, Rutkowski J, Yale JF, Perkins BA. Empagliflozin add-on therapy to closed-loop insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a 2 x 2 factorial randomized crossover trial. Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1269-1276. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01805-3. Epub 2022 May 12.
citation: Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
citation: Bradley C. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. 1994;111:132.
citation: Fisher L, Hessler D, Polonsky W, Strycker L, Masharani U, Peters A. Diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes: Prevalence, incidence and change over time. J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Aug;30(6):1123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
citation: Nordisk N. Ozempic® Product Monograph. 2017.
citation: Zinman B, Bhosekar V, Busch R, Holst I, Ludvik B, Thielke D, Thrasher J, Woo V, Philis-Tsimikas A. Semaglutide once weekly as add-on to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 9): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):356-367. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30066-X. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
citation: Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2228-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61335-0. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
citation: de Wit HM, Vervoort GM, Jansen HJ, de Grauw WJ, de Galan BE, Tack CJ. Liraglutide reverses pronounced insulin-associated weight gain, improves glycaemic control and decreases insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26 week, randomised clinical trial (ELEGANT). Diabetologia. 2014 Sep;57(9):1812-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3302-0. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
citation: Fakhoury WK, Lereun C, Wright D. A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of incretin-based medications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pharmacology. 2010;86(1):44-57. doi: 10.1159/000314690. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
citation: Du Q, Wang YJ, Yang S, Zhao YY, Han P. Liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Nov;31(11):1182-95. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0164-2. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
citation: Dejgaard TF, Schmidt S, Frandsen CS, Vistisen D, Madsbad S, Andersen HU, Norgaard K. Liraglutide reduces hyperglycaemia and body weight in overweight, dysregulated insulin-pump-treated patients with type 1 diabetes: The Lira Pump trial-a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr;22(4):492-500. doi: 10.1111/dom.13911. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
citation: Ahren B, Hirsch IB, Pieber TR, Mathieu C, Gomez-Peralta F, Hansen TK, Philotheou A, Birch S, Christiansen E, Jensen TJ, Buse JB; ADJUNCT TWO Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Added to Capped Insulin Treatment in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes: The ADJUNCT TWO Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1693-701. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0690. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
citation: Mathieu C, Zinman B, Hemmingsson JU, Woo V, Colman P, Christiansen E, Linder M, Bode B; ADJUNCT ONE Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Added to Insulin Treatment in Type 1 Diabetes: The ADJUNCT ONE Treat-To-Target Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1702-10. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0691. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
citation: Johansen NJ, Dejgaard TF, Lund A, Schluntz C, Frandsen CS, Forman JL, Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Holst JJ, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Madsbad S, Vilsboll T, Andersen HU, Knop FK. Efficacy and safety of meal-time administration of short-acting exenatide for glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (MAG1C): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;8(4):313-324. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30030-9. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
citation: Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, Holst AG, Annett MP, Aroda VR. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):258-266. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0417. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
citation: Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Ludemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, Viljoen A; SUSTAIN 7 investigators. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
citation: Capehorn MS, Catarig AM, Furberg JK, Janez A, Price HC, Tadayon S, Verges B, Marre M. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0mg vs once-daily liraglutide 1.2mg as add-on to 1-3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab. 2020 Apr;46(2):100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
citation: Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Riesmeyer JS, Riddle MC, Ryden L, Xavier D, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Rao-Melacini P, Wong G, Avezum A, Basile J, Chung N, Conget I, Cushman WC, Franek E, Hancu N, Hanefeld M, Holt S, Jansky P, Keltai M, Lanas F, Leiter LA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cardona Munoz EG, Pirags V, Pogosova N, Raubenheimer PJ, Shaw JE, Sheu WH, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T; REWIND Investigators. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
citation: Mann JFE, Orsted DD, Brown-Frandsen K, Marso SP, Poulter NR, Rasmussen S, Tornoe K, Zinman B, Buse JB; LEADER Steering Committee and Investigators. Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):839-848. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616011.
citation: Greco EV, Russo G, Giandalia A, Viazzi F, Pontremoli R, De Cosmo S. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Kidney Protection. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 31;55(6):233. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060233.
citation: Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jodar E, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Rosenstock J, Seufert J, Warren ML, Woo V, Hansen O, Holst AG, Pettersson J, Vilsboll T; SUSTAIN-6 Investigators. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
citation: Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JF, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Ravn LS, Steinberg WM, Stockner M, Zinman B, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB; LEADER Steering Committee; LEADER Trial Investigators. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
citation: Kielgast U, Holst JJ, Madsbad S. Treatment of type 1 diabetic patients with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1R agonists. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2009 Nov;5(4):266-75. doi: 10.2174/157339909789804413.
citation: Nauck MA, Holst JJ, Willms B, Schmiegel W. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) as a new therapeutic approach for type 2-diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1997;105(4):187-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1211750.
citation: Kobayati A, Haidar A, Tsoukas MA. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as adjunctive treatment for type 1 diabetes: Renewed opportunities through tailored approaches? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 May;24(5):769-787. doi: 10.1111/dom.14637. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
citation: Stonehouse AH, Darsow T, Maggs DG. Incretin-based therapies. J Diabetes. 2012 Mar;4(1):55-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2011.00143.x.
citation: Muller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, D'Alessio D, Drucker DJ, Flatt PR, Fritsche A, Gribble F, Grill HJ, Habener JF, Holst JJ, Langhans W, Meier JJ, Nauck MA, Perez-Tilve D, Pocai A, Reimann F, Sandoval DA, Schwartz TW, Seeley RJ, Stemmer K, Tang-Christensen M, Woods SC, DiMarchi RD, Tschop MH. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol Metab. 2019 Dec;30:72-130. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
citation: Ahren B. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1): a gut hormone of potential interest in the treatment of diabetes. Bioessays. 1998 Aug;20(8):642-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199808)20:83.0.CO;2-K.
citation: Gutzwiller JP, Drewe J, Goke B, Schmidt H, Rohrer B, Lareida J, Beglinger C. Glucagon-like peptide-1 promotes satiety and reduces food intake in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Am J Physiol. 1999 May;276(5):R1541-4. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.5.R1541.
citation: Pasqua MR, Jafar A, Kobayati A, Tsoukas MA, Haidar A. Low-Dose Empagliflozin as Adjunct to Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy in Adults With Suboptimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(1):165-172. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0490.
citation: Haidar A, Yale JF, Lovblom LE, Cardinez N, Orszag A, Falappa CM, Gouchie-Provencher N, Tsoukas MA, El Fathi A, Rene J, Eldelekli D, Lanctot SO, Scarr D, Perkins BA. Reducing the need for carbohydrate counting in type 1 diabetes using closed-loop automated insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) and empagliflozin: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, crossover pilot trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1272-1281. doi: 10.1111/dom.14335. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
citation: Rosenstock J, Marquard J, Laffel LM, Neubacher D, Kaspers S, Cherney DZ, Zinman B, Skyler JS, George J, Soleymanlou N, Perkins BA. Empagliflozin as Adjunctive to Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes: The EASE Trials. Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2560-2569. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1749. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
citation: Tsoukas MA, Woo V, Tobe SW, Slee A, Rapattoni W, Ang FG, Seufert J, Neuen BL, Arnott C, Mahaffey KW, Wheeler DC. Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with canagliflozin according to type 2 diabetes treatment targets at baseline: Data from the CANVAS programme and CREDENCE. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jul;25(7):2038-2042. doi: 10.1111/dom.15057. Epub 2023 Apr 4. No abstract available.
citation: Riddle MC, Cefalu WT. SGLT Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes: An Obvious Choice or Too Good to Be True? Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2444-2447. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0041. No abstract available.
citation: Pradhan A, Vohra S, Vishwakarma P, Sethi R. Review on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in diabetes mellitus and heart failure. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1855-1862. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_232_19.