Clinical trial NCT04261101: Test-enhanced Learning to Prepare for Future Learning in Endocrinology
Official title: Test-enhanced Learning Using Causal Connections to Prepare for Future Learning in Endocrinology: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Endocrinopathy
Educational Problems
Lead sponsor: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2020-02-07
Enrollment: 84
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The use of test-enhanced learning with causal connection and in preparation for future learning has been used in health educational setting with positive results. However, most studies were performed in a controlled lab scenario and not in the "real world" of medicine classes, decreasing the external applicability of such experiments. Therefore, the aim of present study is to evaluate if a session of test-enhanced learning at the beginning of endocrinology course, using basic-clinical sciences connections of key concepts, would prepare for future learning of endocrinology on a theory-practical 4-week endocrinology course.

Methods Study design, participants and description of undergraduate endocrinology course This is a prospective, single center, non-blinded, RCT. Participants are students of medicine from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil, in their third year of Medical School, recruited at the beginning of endocrinology undergraduate clinical placement. This clinical trial follows the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement, which includes the completing the CONSORT checklist.

Sample size Based in a previous study, to find a difference in the percentage of correct answers in a cognitive test to evaluate retention of 12%, considering a SD of 26%, alpha error of 5%, beta error of 20%, and repeated assessments (baseline, 3 weeks and 6 months), 35 students will be necessary in each group. To account for possible losses of follow-up, 84 students will be included.

Study intervention All students will receive, in advance, a text with basic sciences information relevant to the learning of Endocrinology (supplementary material), with instructions to study the text before intervention day.

Students will be randomized to one of the interventions: TEL with questions about diabetes and adrenal (Block A, 6 questions) or thyroid and hypophysis (Block B, 6 questions). Important endocrinology concepts, such as fuel metabolism and circadian rhythm will be included in Block A, and feedback loops and hormone synthesis in Block B. Specific hormone functions will be part of both TEL Blocks.

Assessments At the same day of intervention, students will answer all questions 12 of the TEL session (questions from blocks A and B) with best answer multiple choice questions (immediate retention test). After 3 weeks and 6 months, the transfer of knowledge will be assessed with a 24 multiple choice questions test, based in clinical cases.

Detailed description: Introduction The ability to connect previous learned basic-sciences concepts to patient's clinical features can help improve clinical reasoning. While experts use several shortcuts to reach a correct diagnosis, such as clinical presentation patterns, "stored" due to years of exposure to real cases, the novice need other strategies to build diagnostic scripts to achieve expertise. Inexperienced medical students acquire clinical reasoning by exploring why specific symptoms occur, usually based on basic science mechanisms. Even experienced physicians apply these connections to solve difficult cases, though sometimes, not in a conscious way. Benefits of causal connections between basic and clinical sciences for clinical reasoning is supported by randomized clinical trials (RCTs). When teaching endocrinology, this strategy acquires additional relevance, as basic concepts regarding hormone action and regulation (ex: feedback loops) are commonly utilized in day-to-day patient care.

Test-enhanced learning is an effective strategy to optimize knowledge acquisition, through formative assessment with the sole objective to promote learning. Testing improves learning through two means: a) an indirect benefit, as it stimulates preparation for the test, and b) through a direct effect, in which the mental effort to answer a question mobilizes and brain connections and reinforces learning. This educational tool has been studied in health professions education, including medical school and clinical training. The utilization of test-enhanced learning with short answers is more efficacious than only restudy or self-explanation. Moreover, the effect lasted for at least 6 months.

More important than content retention and linkage between biomedical concepts and clinical features, is the idea that knowledge must be applied in a different context in the future, a capacity named adaptive expertise. An essential part of training for adaptive expertise is preparation for future learning. It means that a learning session should prepare the student for future acquisition of content, competences and abilities. Medicine is certainly an area where adaptive expertise is crucial, as biological sciences are in continuous progress, requiring constant and continued education.

The use of test-enhanced learning with causal connection and in preparation for future learning has been used in health educational setting with positive results. However, most studies were performed in a controlled lab scenario and not in the "real world" of medicine classes, decreasing the external applicability of such experiments. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate if a session of test-enhanced learning at the beginning of endocrinology course, using basic-clinical sciences connections of key concepts, would prepare for future learning of endocrinology on a theory-practical 4-week endocrinology course.

Methods Study design, participants and description of undergraduate endocrinology course This is a prospective, single center, non-blinded, RCT. Participants are students of medicine from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil, in their third year of Medical School, recruited at the beginning of endocrinology undergraduate clinical placement. This clinical trial follows the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement, which includes the completing the CONSORT checklist.

Sample size Based in a previous study, to find a difference in the percentage of correct answers in a cognitive test to evaluate retention of 12%, considering a SD of 26%, alpha error of 5%, beta error of 20%, and repeated assessments (baseline, 3 weeks and 6 months), 35 students will be necessary in each group. To account for possible losses of follow-up, 84 students will be included.

Study intervention All students will receive, in advance, a text with basic sciences information relevant to the learning of Endocrinology (supplementary material), with instructions to study the text before intervention day.

Students will be randomized to one of the interventions: TEL with questions about diabetes and adrenal (Block A, 6 questions) or thyroid and hypophysis (Block B, 6 questions). Important endocrinology concepts, such as fuel metabolism and circadian rhythm will be included in Block A, and feedback loops and hormone synthesis in Block B. Specific hormone functions will be part of both TEL Blocks.

Assessments At the same day of intervention, students will answer all questions 12 of the TEL session (questions from blocks A and B) with best answer multiple choice questions (immediate retention test). After 3 weeks and 6 months, the transfer of knowledge will be assessed with a 24 multiple choice questions test, based in clinical cases.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Students will be consecutively invited to participated in the study before starting their Endocrinology placement and will be included after agreeing to participate and signing an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Students absent on the day of study intervention or on the four-week assessment will be excluded from analysis.

Primary outcomes:
measure: 24 multiple choice questions test at 3 weeks
timeFrame: 3 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Immediate retention test
timeFrame: immediately after test
measure: 24 multiple choice questions test at 6 months
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Metacognition questionnaires - professors
timeFrame: 4 weeks
measure: Metacognition questionnaires - students
timeFrame: 4 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
name: Cristiane B Leitao, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: