Clinical trial NCT04531579: Valproic Acid (VPA) for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Trauma Patients
Official title: Evaluation of Valproic Acid (VPA) as Adjunctive Therapy for Trauma Patients With Moderate to Severe Hemorrhage at Risk of Ischemia Reperfusion (I/R) Injury
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Acute Kidney Injury
Ischemia Reperfusion Injury
Keywords: valproic acid
acute kidney injury
ischemia reperfusion injury
hemorrhage
trauma
Lead sponsor: Westat
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: United States Department of Defense
name: Clinipace Worldwide
First posted: 2020-08-28
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: A phase 2, single-dose, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to find out if a drug called valproic acid (VPA) will protect organs (such as the kidneys) from damage when a person is injured and loses a large amount of blood. The organs may not get enough blood or oxygen when a patient loses a lot of blood. After the patient receives fluids such as blood, plasma, or saline and the bleeding is stopped, blood and oxygen return to the organs. This process called ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is known to cause injury to organs such as the kidneys and heart. VPA is an approved drug for treating conditions like seizures and migraines for many years. However, it is not approved for use at the higher dose that will be used in this study or for protecting organs from I/R injury. This study will enroll trauma patients and randomly assign them to receive either VPA diluted in salt water or salt water without VPA (placebo) and then follow the patients and compare their organ function and overall outcome. This study is masked meaning that the patients, doctors, and nurses will not know which patient received which treatment. The study treatment will be given in addition to the care that trauma patients normally receive to treat their injuries. The researchers doing this study believe that VPA will lessen organ injury caused by I/R, meaning that patients who receive VPA will experience less kidney injury when compared to patients who receive the placebo.

Detailed description: I/R injury is a critical condition that causes cell damage and organ dysfunction and contributes to morbidity and mortality in a wide range of pathologies. Ischemia is defined as hypoperfusion of tissues, which can occur in conditions such as hemorrhage, sepsis, organ transplantation, and acute coronary syndrome. An imbalance in metabolic supply and demand within the ischemic organ results in tissue hypoxia and microvascular dysfunction. Among trauma patients who have suffered significant blood loss and prolonged hypotension requiring multiple vasopressors, the kidney frequently shows injury due to significant I/R. The rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) in trauma patients is reported to be between 25-30%.

VPA is an anticonvulsant drug that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1978. VPA was developed for use as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for the treatment of seizure disorders, mania associated with bipolar disorder, and migraine. Both oral and intravenous (IV) formulations are available. Doses up to 60 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day for up to 14 days have been demonstrated to be safe and effective. More recently, a study has shown that a single dose of intravenous VPA at up to 140 mg/kg is safe in healthy volunteers. VPA has been recognized as an histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) shown to reduce the inflammatory response and oxidative stress in septic mice, thereby protecting against renal injury. The molecular mechanisms conferring anticonvulsant properties associated with VPA have not been clearly elucidated to date, but likely include increasing levels of γ-aminobutyric acid in the central nervous system (CNS), reduction in N-Methyl-D-Aspartate-mediated excitation, and blockade of voltage gated sodium and L-type calcium channels. More recently, VPA has shown HDACI potential, specifically targeting class I (subclasses Ia and Ib) and class II (subclass IIa) HDAC proteins. Given that VPA modulates multiple pathways involved in AKI, it theoretically could prevent kidney dysfunction and inflammation that is induced by I/R injury.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of VPA on reducing I/R injury related to organ damage in the kidneys in trauma patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of VPA on reducing AKI compared with placebo in trauma patients with expected moderated-to-severe hemorrhage at risk for I/R injury. The two secondary objectives are: 1) To assess the post-infusion pharmacokinetics (PK) of VPA in trauma patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage at risk of I/R injury, and 2) To evaluate the safety of VPA administered as IV infusion in trauma patients with moderate-to-severe hemorrhage at risk of I/R injury.

This is a phase 2, single-dose, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of 140 mg/kg of VPA plus standard of care (SOC) or the placebo plus SOC, administered via IV infusion within 3 hours (ideally 1 hour) after admittance to the emergency department (ED). Clinical evaluations such as physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory results will be collected. AKI will be used to assess VPA efficacy. Myocardial injury and laboratory measurements (hematology, chemistry, coagulation profile, and urinalysis) will be used to monitor subject safety. Outcome measures including in-hospital mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and/or stepdown unit (SDU) stay, length of hospital stay, number of alive and ventilator free days (aVFD), and incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) will also be collected. Blood samples will be collected for PK analysis. The PK analysis will correlate study drug exposures with safety profiles. Specimens (plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and urine) will be stored for future undetermined study-related analyses, including pharmacodynamics (PD) and VPA responsiveness studies. These studies may correlate PK profiles to molecular changes related to beneficial properties of VPA.

Male and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female hemorrhaging trauma patients between 18 and 80 years old will be recruited for the study. Trauma patients will be those whose arrival to the ED results in trauma team activation. Only patients who can provide consent or for whom a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) can provide consent, will be enrolled. Approximately 50 subjects will be recruited from across two major medical centers for participation in this study.

Based on the available safety profile data from multi-dose clinical trials of VPA, the product safety information sheet, as well as the VPA Phase 1 study which evaluated the safety of single ascending doses of VPA, it has been determined that a dose of 140 mg/kg is safe and well-tolerated with minimal adverse reactions. However, given that patients studied at the 140 mg/kg dose in the phase 1 study were relatively healthy compared to the proposed patient population in this study and unanticipated Adverse Events (AEs) may occur, the study team will monitor all study subjects closely for AEs throughout the study. All AEs will be evaluated for duration, seriousness, severity, and relationship to the study drug, and reported accordingly.

This study will be monitored according to the data and safety monitoring plan which will outline the different levels of monitoring and the responsible parties. A Safety Review Committee (SRC) will review and monitor all safety information and compliance data as well as the overall study progress on a regular basis. A Medical Monitor (MM) with relevant clinical and research expertise will oversee the clinical study and provide ongoing medical monitoring. The clinical site Principal Investigators (PIs) will be responsible for ensuring that all AEs that occur in subjects during the AE reporting period are managed and reported in accordance with the protocol, Sponsor requirements, and any applicable regulations and institutional policies. A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will monitor implementation and progress of the study and review the accumulating endpoint and safety data by treatment arm to detect evidence of early significant benefit or harm for subjects while the study is in progress.

As the main purpose of this study is to evaluate safety of VPA in the study population and to investigate efficacy signal, this is a proof-of-concept (PoC) study. Because it is a PoC study rather than a confirmatory one, it has been assumed that a total sample size of 50 subjects (25 in each treatment arm) will be sufficient to provide adequate clinical evidence of safety and potential efficacy, and to support decision-making on whether a larger pivotal confirmatory Phase 3 study would be justified.

A statistical analysis plan (SAP) that details the analytical principles and statistical techniques to be employed in order to address the primary and secondary objectives will be developed. Demographic and relevant baseline characteristics will be presented and summarized descriptively by treatment for the randomized, modified intent-to-treat (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) populations. The primary endpoint of KDIGO stages will be measured in ordinal scale as 0, 1, 2, or 3, where 0 indicates normal renal function and the progressively higher values indicate worsening renal function. The ordinal scale measurements will be analyzed using the proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model. The KDIGO stages will be the dependent variable and drug treatment will be used as the independent variable. The common odds ratio across the KDIGO stages and its 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Binary endpoints (e.g., incidence of AKI) will be analyzed by Fisher's exact test or logistic regression with treatment as an independent variable. The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Continuous outcomes will be analyzed by missed effects models with treatment and baseline value of the outcome (if applicable) as independent variables. Un-ordered categorical variables with more than two levels of outcome will be analyzed by a chi-square test. Ordered categorical variables with more than two levels of outcome will be analyzed in the same way as for the primary endpoint. Safety endpoints will be analyzed and summarized descriptively. Categorical variables will be summarized by count and percentage. Odds ratios and relative risks may be calculated to compare study drug with placebo in incidence of certain safety events. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean, SD, median, minimum, and maximum. Shift tables may be used to describe changes in certain laboratory values. The plan for the PK analysis is two-fold. First, a standard noncompartmental analysis will be performed to obtain descriptors of VPA exposure to explore potential relationships to the primary outcome), secondary outcomes, or any observed adverse effects. A population PK analysis will be performed to examine and, perhaps, explain the anticipated differing PK of VPA in the trial. Specifically, low protein binding of VPA and massive blood loss are expected to affect the elimination clearance and, perhaps, the volume of distribution of VPA. Characterizing the degree to which the PK are perturbed as well as the parameter variability in this population will be important for analyzing the relationship of VPA exposure to primary and secondary outcomes and determining the effects, if any, of factors related to disease or perioperative conditions to the PK of VPA.

No interim analyses will be performed for this study. This study does not have a formal stopping rule based on statistical testing. See Section 3.9 for more information on stopping rules. Missing data can occur in clinical studies, and they may have an impact on the results of statistical analyses. Every effort will be made to ensure that the amount of missing data is kept at a minimum.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Is aged 18 to 80 years old;
* Is male or non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female;
* Is able to provide written informed consent or has an LAR from whom consent can be obtained;
* Body mass index (BMI) is between 18 kg/m2 and 35 kg/m2;
* Injuries or underlying medical problems are considered likely survivable by the attending trauma physician on initial evaluation; and
* Experienced blunt or penetrating trauma that resulted in bleeding with at least two systolic blood pressure (SBP) readings ≤100 mmHg at any point during transport to the ED or during the Screening period. SBP readings of ≤100 mmHg need not be consecutive.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Has a known history of adverse reaction to VPA;
* Is currently receiving VPA;
* Is pregnant or breastfeeding;
* Has inadequate venous access;
* Is in need of a kidney transplant, or currently on RRT for either AKI or hepato-renal syndrome, type I (HRS-I);
* Is known to have mitochondrial disorders caused by polymerase γ (POLG) mutations;
* Is currently incarcerated or pending incarceration;
* Is being transferred/transported from a referring facility and 1) spent more than 1 hour at the referring facility or 2) received any surgical or I/R procedure for hemorrhage control. (Blood transfusions and minor ED procedures, i.e., tourniquet placement, chest tube placement, etc. are not exclusionary);
* Has a known history of hepatic dysfunction (defined as Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score \>15), pancreatitis (recurrent, recent, or severe), or renal insufficiency (defined as SCr result \>2.0 mg/dl);
* Has non-survivable injuries based on the judgement of the attending trauma physician (e.g., pre-hospital cardiac arrest);
* Has non-hemorrhagic etiologies of shock (e.g., neurogenic, cardiogenic, septic, drowning, hanging, etc.);
* Has second or third degree burns of any size or location;
* Has severe trauma brain injury (TBI) defined as a positive head computed tomography (CT) scan and a score of less than eight on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); or
* Has other unspecified reason/condition that, in the opinion of the clinical site PI, make the patient unsuitable for enrollment.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Stage of AKI as assessed by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage based on serum creatinine (SCr)
timeFrame: Within the first 48 hours after study drug administration
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Blood lipocalin-2 (LCN2)
timeFrame: At baseline, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours from the end of infusion, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
measure: Urine lipocalin-2 (LCN2)
timeFrame: At baseline, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours after study drug administration, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
measure: Incidence of AKI defined by the occurrence of KDIGO stages 1, 2, or 3 based on SCr, or based on urine output (UO) for those subjects with missing SCr
timeFrame: Within the first 48 hours after study drug administration
measure: Incidence of AKI defined by SCr increase or for those subjects with missing SCr, UO decrease
timeFrame: SCr at 1 hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after study drug administration, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first; or UO every 6 hours through 48 hours after study drug administration
measure: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on SCr and/or cystatin C
timeFrame: At 1 hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after study drug administration, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
Other outcomes:
measure: Serum creatinine (SCr) values
timeFrame: At 1 hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after study drug administration, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
measure: Volume of all fluids and blood products received by the subject
timeFrame: At time of ED arrival through 48 hours after study drug administration
measure: Timing of all fluids and blood products received by the subject
timeFrame: At time of ED arrival through 48 hours after study drug administration
measure: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score
timeFrame: Daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
measure: Intensive care unit (ICU) and/or stepdown unit (SDU) stay
timeFrame: Through Day 7 after study drug administration
measure: Hospital stay
timeFrame: Through Day 7 after study drug administration
measure: Renal replacement therapy (RRT)
timeFrame: Through Day 7 after study drug administration
measure: Alive and ventilator free days (aVFD)
timeFrame: Through Day 7 after study drug administration
measure: Mortality
timeFrame: Through Day 7 after study drug administration
measure: Myocardial injury
timeFrame: At 1 hour, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours after study drug administration, and then daily through day of hospital discharge or Day 7, whichever comes first
measure: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
timeFrame: After study drug administration through Day 7
measure: Adverse events of special interest (AESIs)
timeFrame: After study drug administration through Day 7
measure: Serious adverse events (SAEs)
timeFrame: After study drug administration through Day 7
measure: Deaths
timeFrame: After study drug administration through Day 7
Locations:
city: Baltimore
country: United States
facility: University of Maryland - Baltimore
state: Maryland
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: University of Washington
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: Westat
name: Cristina Rabadan-Diehl, PharmD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Bihorac A, Delano MJ, Schold JD, Lopez MC, Nathens AB, Maier RV, Layon AJ, Baker HV, Moldawer LL. Incidence, clinical predictors, genomics, and outcome of acute kidney injury among trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):158-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181deb6bc.
citation: Chateauvieux S, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:479364. doi: 10.1155/2010/479364. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
citation: Costantini TW, Fraga G, Fortlage D, Wynn S, Fraga A, Lee J, Doucet J, Bansal V, Coimbra R. Redefining renal dysfunction in trauma: implementation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network staging system. J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):283-7; discussion 287-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a51a51.
citation: Georgoff PE, Nikolian VC, Bonham T, Pai MP, Tafatia C, Halaweish I, To K, Watcharotone K, Parameswaran A, Luo R, Sun D, Alam HB. Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Valproic Acid in Healthy Subjects: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Feb;57(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0553-1.
citation: Heegard KD, Stewart IJ, Cap AP, Sosnov JA, Kwan HK, Glass KR, Morrow BD, Latack W, Henderson AT, Saenz KK, Siew ED, Ikizler TA, Chung KK. Early acute kidney injury in military casualties. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):988-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000607.
citation: Li Y, Alam HB. Creating a pro-survival and anti-inflammatory phenotype by modulation of acetylation in models of hemorrhagic and septic shock. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;710:107-33. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5638-5_11.
citation: Wu MY, Yiang GT, Liao WT, Tsai AP, Cheng YL, Cheng PW, Li CY, Li CJ. Current Mechanistic Concepts in Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(4):1650-1667. doi: 10.1159/000489241. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
citation: Zheng Q, Liu W, Liu Z, Zhao H, Han X, Zhao M. Valproic acid protects septic mice from renal injury by reducing the inflammatory response. J Surg Res. 2014 Nov;192(1):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.030. Epub 2014 May 20.