Clinical trial NCT05710484: Voice Quality Changes With IANB Anesthesia
Official title: Investigating the Impact of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia on Acoustic Voice Quality Using a Within-subject Design
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Anesthesia, Local
Voice Change
Keywords: Voice Quality
Anesthesia, Dental
Mandibular Nerve
Lingual Nerve
Speech Acoustics
Lead sponsor: Marmara University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-02-02
Enrollment: 34
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 65
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Observational model: OTHER
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: The study population will consist of adults aged 18 years or older who are scheduled to receive inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia as part of their dental procedure.

Brief summary: Background: Inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia is commonly used in dental procedures, but its effect on the voice quality is not well understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of mandibular anesthesia on the acoustic voice quality index.

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of mandibular anesthesia on the acoustic voice quality index.

Design: This is a within-subject study design. Participants will be recruited from a local dental clinic and will be adults aged 18 years or older. The participants will have the acoustic voice quality index measured before and after the administration of mandibular anesthesia. The parameters that will be measured include acoustic voice quality index and self ........ The data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical techniques.

Expected Outcome: The study is expected to provide insights into the effect of mandibular anesthesia on the acoustic voice quality index. The results of this study may help in understanding the impact of mandibular anesthesia on voice quality and may have implications for dental practitioners and patients who receive mandibular anesthesia.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* able to provide informed consent
* able to communicate in the local language
* no history of voice disorders or speech therapy
* no history of any diseases or conditions that could affect voice quality.

Exclusion Criteria:

* pregnant or breastfeeding women
* individuals with a history of allergies or adverse reactions to anesthesia
* individuals with a history of any diseases or conditions that could affect voice quality

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Acoustic Voice Analyze measurements; Motor Speech Profile (MSP)
timeFrame: Immediate before inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, immediately after inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia roughly 5 minutes later
measure: Change in Acoustic Voice Analyze measurements; Multi-dimensional voice program (MDVP)
timeFrame: Immediate before inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, immediately after inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia roughly 5 minutes later
measure: Change in Acoustic Voice Analyze measurements; Analysis of dysphonia in speech and voice (ADSV)
timeFrame: Immediate before inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, immediately after inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia roughly 5 minutes later
measure: Change in Acoustic Voice Analyze measurements;Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI)
timeFrame: Immediate before inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, immediately after inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia roughly 5 minutes later
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in BORG Scale (CR-10)
timeFrame: Exercise timing is immediate before inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, holding a dental mirror with only lips and tongue, for 2 minutes
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Istanbul
country: Turkey
facility: Marmara University School of Dentistry
Study officials:
References:
citation: Barsties V Latoszek B, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Uloza V, Maryn Y. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dysphonia Classification of DSI and AVQI. Laryngoscope. 2019 Mar;129(3):692-698. doi: 10.1002/lary.27350. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
citation: Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):514-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042.
citation: Correia JM, Caballero-Gaudes C, Guediche S, Carreiras M. Phonatory and articulatory representations of speech production in cortical and subcortical fMRI responses. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 11;10(1):4529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61435-y.
citation: Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):557-69. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80010-1.
citation: Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. J Voice. 2010 Sep;24(5):540-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
citation: Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, Verdolini Abbott K. Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Development and Validation. J Voice. 2015 Jul;29(4):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.012. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
citation: Sirin S, Ogut MF, Bilgen C. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index. Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):902-909. doi: 10.3906/sag-1908-105.
citation: Yesilli-Puzella G, Tadihan-Ozkan E, Maryn Y. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language. J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.