Clinical trial NCT06595446: A Feasibility Randomized Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer
Official title: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Bladder Cancer Requiring Cystectomy
Ileal Conduit
Urinary Diversion
Keywords: Bladder cancer
Radical cystectomy
Stent dwell time
Complications
Ileal conduit
Lead sponsor: Western University, Canada
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-09-19
Enrollment: 60
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Bladder cancer is the 4th most common cancer in men and 5th most common type of cancer in Canada. Urothelial cancer accounts for approximately 90% of malignancies. At diagnosis, over 75% of cases are classified as non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and with appropriate treatment, the majority of these patients achieve positive outcomes. The progression rate of NMIBC to Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) varies between 5-50% at 5 years dependent on histopathological features such as grade, stage, presence of CIS and age (Carcinoma in Situ). The optimal treatment of MIBC (T2-T4N0M0) consists of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RCUD). In the last couple of decades, RCUD has also gained attention for treating patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and the rise of minimally invasive alternatives, complications after surgery remain frequent, with morbidity rates of approximately 50%.

Several uncertainties persist in surgical practice, including the role of perioperative ureteric stenting during RCUD. Perioperative ureteric stenting is intended to minimize urinary leakage from the newly created uretero-enteric anastomosis and to prevent early obstruction caused by anastomotic swelling. However, stenting may increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and necessitate additional follow-up for stent removal. Peng et al. conducted the most recent systematic review in 2021, demonstrating that ureteral stents in RCUD were linked to higher rates of anastomotic strictures. Their review did not provide evidence that these stents were more effective than not using stents in preventing post-diversion urinary leakage. The review underscored the scarcity of prospective randomized controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of stenting in this context. The sole prospective (non-randomized) study assessing stent dwell / retention time after RCUD demonstrated early stent removal (2 weeks) had decreased 90-day readmissions and UTIs.

Therefore, the investigators aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized trial to evaluate patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation to receive either early stent removal (5-7 days) or late stent removal (4-6 weeks).


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients (18 years or older) undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation for bladder cancer
* Able to give informed written consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies);
* Patients undergoing alternative forms of urinary diversion (e.g. continent cutaneous urinary diversion or orthotopic neobladder formation)
* Patients previously received abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy
* Patients with concomitant upper urinary tract cancer

Primary outcomes:
measure: Complication rates
timeFrame: within 30 days:
measure: Feasibility Outcomes
timeFrame: 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Complication rates
timeFrame: within 90 days
measure: Readmission rates
timeFrame: within 90 days
measure: Complication rates
timeFrame: within 1 year
Other outcomes:
measure: Length of stay
timeFrame: 90 days
Locations:
city: London
country: Canada
facility: Victoria Hospital
state: Ontario
Study officials:
References:
citation: Beano H, He J, Hensel C, Worrilow W, Townsend W, Gaston K, Clark PE, Riggs S. Safety of decreasing ureteral stent duration following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03191-2. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
citation: Peng YL, Ning K, Wu ZS, Li ZY, Deng MH, Xiong LB, Yu CP, Zhang ZL, Liu ZW, Lu HM, Zhou FJ. Ureteral stents cannot decrease the incidence of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture and leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2021 Sep;93:106058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106058. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
citation: Bhindi B, Kool R, Kulkarni GS, Siemens DR, Aprikian AG, Breau RH, Brimo F, Fairey A, French C, Hanna N, Izawa JI, Lacombe L, McPherson V, Rendon RA, Shayegan B, So AI, Zlotta AR, Black PC, Kassouf W. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Aug;15(8):E424-E460. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7367. No abstract available.