Clinical trial NCT01826890: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Adults at Risk of Delayed Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
Official title: A Randomised Feasibility Study Examining Neurally-adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Ventilatory Failure During Recovery From Critical Illness.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
Keywords: Ventilator Weaning
Mechanical Ventilation
Critical Care
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist
Diaphragm
Lead sponsor: King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
name: King's College London
name: National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
name: JP Moulton Charitable Foundation
First posted: 2013-04-09
Enrollment: 78
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 100
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Brief summary: Many patients admitted to intensive care have heart or lung problems. Patients with these conditions often require longer durations of support from breathing machines. Survival and long-term recovery are improved if the investigators can remove the breathing support quickly. In this study, the investigators will focus on patients with severe lung or heart disease to examine whether a particular type of breathing machine (NAVA ventilator) will allow us to remove breathing support more quickly and with less need for sedative medications, when compared to current practice.

Detailed description: In this study, we will compare the use of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist technology (the NAVA ventilation mode and the monitoring capabilities) against standard care in patients who are at risk of prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation.

Study aim

To inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) by undertaking feasibility testing, evaluation of the proposed NAVA intervention and evaluation of the proposed outcomes.

Feasibility outcomes

* Number of eligible patients
* Assessment of screening and recruitment methods
* The willingness of clinicians to allow recruitment
* The willingness of participants to be randomised
* Assessment of the randomisation process
* Staff attitudes and training needs
* Protocol compliance (barriers to the use of NAVA ventilation)

Intended primary outcomes of the main study

\*Ventilator-free days (day 28)

There are a number of secondary outcomes that include:

* Total sedation / hypnotic / analgesic dose
* Ventilator free days (day 90)
* Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)
* Duration of MV (including Non-invasive ventilation (NIV))
* Duration of post extubation NIV
* Incidence of delirium (CAM-ICU)
* Change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 3, 7, 14 and 28
* ICU and hospital length of stay
* Day 28, ICU discharge, hospital discharge and 90 day post randomisation survival
* Agitation / comfort (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) plus Visual \*Analogue Scale where possible)
* Frequency of sedation / analgesic / hypnotic bolus doses
* Ventilator associated pneumonia (developed 48 hours after study entry)
* Unplanned device removal (eg. ET tubes, catheters etc.)
* Patient-ventilator asynchrony
* Duration in each ventilation mode
* Change in the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi)
* Health Resource Group costs
* Quality of life at 90 days - SF36 questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

A pilot feasibility, single centre, open label randomised controlled study. In summary, group one will receive standard care and group two will receive standard care with the addition of NAVA technology.

POPULATION

Intubated, critically ill or high-risk elective peri-operative adult patients who are at greatest risk of difficult or prolonged weaning: those with pre-existing cardiopulmonary dysfunction.

Inclusions

ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:

1. COPD
2. Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
3. Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.

Exclusions

* Less than 18 years old or pregnant.
* Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable).
* No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined.
* Greater than 96 hours from intubation.
* Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase.
* Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours.
* Contraindication to passing NG tube.
* Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence.
* High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score \< 8).
* Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury.
* Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA.
* Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one.
* Domiciliary ventilation (except Continuous Positive Pressure (CPAP)or Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) used for sleep disordered breathing).
* Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days.
* Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent.

STUDY SITE

Three adult ICUs at KCH NHS Foundation Trust, London.

SAMPLE SIZE

76 patients will be recruited to estimate an anticipated compliance of 75% (95% confidence interval of +/- 10%).

FOLLOW-UP SF-36 will occur at 90 days post ICU discharge.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:

1. COPD
2. Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
3. Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Less than 18 years old or pregnant
* Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable)
* No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined
* Greater than 96 hours from intubation
* Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase
* Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours
* Contraindication to passing NG tube
* Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence
* High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score \< 8)
* Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury
* Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA
* Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one
* Domiciliary ventilation (except CPAP/BIPAP used for sleep disordered breathing)
* Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days
* Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent

Primary outcomes:
measure: Protocol compliance
timeFrame: 28 days
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Study officials:
affiliation: King's College Hospital NHS Trust
name: Daniel J Hadfield
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: King's College Hopspital NHS Foundation Trust
name: Phillip A Hopkins
role: STUDY_CHAIR
affiliation: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
name: Nicholas Hart
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: King's College Hospital NHS Trust
name: Gerrard F Rafferty
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Hadfield DJ, Rose L, Reid F, Cornelius V, Hart N, Finney C, Penhaligon B, Molai J, Harris C, Saha S, Noble H, Clarey E, Thompson L, Smith J, Johnson L, Hopkins PA, Rafferty GF. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial performed in patients at risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 May 14;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02923-5.