Clinical trial NCT05468008: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
Official title: Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in Western Population
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Conditions: Esophageal Lesion
Barrett Esophagus
Gastrointestinal Lesions
Lead sponsor: AdventHealth
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2022-07-21
Enrollment: 1000
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: Patients who present to the Center of Interventional Endoscopy for standard of care ESD procedure.

Brief summary: This registry is to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection. All patients will receive standard of medical care and no experimental interventions will be performed.

Detailed description: The technique of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) is currently widely used in the US to remove precancerous or cancerous lesions confined to the mucosa of the GI tract. EMR carries lower morbidity and mortality compare to surgery, at the expense of a higher rate of piecemeal removal, incomplete resection and cancer recurrence. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) is a newer technique developed in Japan that involves en-bloc resection of the entire lesion irrespective of size, allowing for a detailed analysis of the resected margins and depth of invasion and producing a lower local recurrence. Due to the lack of dedicated ESD devices the procedure has not been disseminated in Western countries. Recently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a number of devices for ESD. The vast majority of studies evaluating the clinical outcomes from ESD are originating in Japan where the technique is mostly applied to patients with early gastric cancer (Japan has the highest incidence of gastric cancer in the word). In the US lesions that are currently treated with EMR are mostly located in the esophagus (Barrett esophagus) and colon (large adenomatous polyps and intramucosal cancer). These esophageal and colonic lesions can be treated with ESD with expected higher rate of en-block resection and lower recurrence rate compare to EMR. With the differences in patient population and disease location one can anticipate some differences in outcomes between ESD performed in Asian and US patients. Therefore, the investigator wants to prospectively record the experience with ESD done as part of routine medical care in United States (US) population. This will be a prospective data recording study. All patients will receive standard medical care and no experimental interventions will be performed.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18 years or older
* Scheduled to undergo ESD

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any contraindication to performing endoscopy
* Participation in another research protocol that could interfere or influence the outcomes measures of the present study.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Evaluate the utility of ESD for treatment of gastrointestinal lesions
timeFrame: 12 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: En-Bloc Resection Rate
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Complete Resection Rate
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Curative Resection Rate
timeFrame: 6 months
measure: Safety- Adverse Events
timeFrame: 12 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Orlando
country: United States
facility: AdventHealth Orlando
state: Florida
Study officials:
affiliation: AdventHealth Orlando
name: Dennis Yang, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kotzev AI, Yang D, Draganov PV. How to master endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jan;31(1):94-100. doi: 10.1111/den.13240. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
citation: Yang D, Wagh MS, Draganov PV. The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1016-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.047. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
citation: Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):417-434. doi: 10.1111/den.12456. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
citation: Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1019-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
citation: Yang D, Draganov PV. Expanding Role of Third Space Endoscopy in the Management of Esophageal Diseases. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):41-57. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0169-z.
citation: Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Mandolesi D, Farioli A, Cucchetti A, Frazzoni L, Bhandari P, Bellisario C, Bazzoli F, Repici A. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):74-86.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 28.