Clinical trial NCT05383690: Effects of Litebook EDGE™ Phototherapy on Academic Performance and Brain Activity
Official title: Effects of Litebook EDGE™ Phototherapy on Academic Performance and Functional Brain Activity in Non-Depressed Adolescents
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Sleepiness, Daytime
Lead sponsor: Mclean Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: LiteBook Company Ltd
First posted: 2022-05-20
Enrollment: 26
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 13
Maximum age (years): 18
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Intervention model description: Single arm, with independent variable being percent device use.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: As children pass through puberty the timing of their sleep-wake cycle shifts and they experience a strong urge to stay up and awaken late. High school typically starts early in the morning and a significant percentage of normal adolescents arrive at school each day with an insufficient amount of sleep, which can take a substantial toll on their academic performance. As the primary reason for insufficient sleep is a naturally occurring propensity to stay up later in the evening it seems plausible that bright light treatment (BLT) at the appropriate time may phase advance biological clocks and potentially reverse this problem. Hence, the investigators are testing the hypothesis that consistent morning use of a light emitting diode (LED) BLT device (LiteBook Edge™) by healthy adolescents will shift the phase of their sleep wake cycle and enable them to receive an increased amount of sleep during the school week and perform better on tests of attention and academic performance and evidence signs of improved alertness. Alternatively, BLT could potentially enhance alertness through other mechanisms, such as a direct arousing effect, without exerting a discernible effect on circadian phase or sleep duration.

Detailed description: As children pass through puberty the timing of their sleep-wake cycle shifts and they experience a strong urge to stay up and awaken late. Hence, a large percentage of normal adolescents arrive at school each day with an insufficient amount of sleep, which can take a substantial toll on their academic performance.

A growing number of human studies show that sleep promotes learning and memory. Conversely, sleep deprivation has a negative impact on cognitive and behavioral functions. Relatively few studies have examined effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in adolescents. In these studies, total sleep deprivation was associated with impaired memory performance and diminished computational speed, while, partial sleep deprivation was associated with deficits in reasoning and verbal creativity. For example, male adolescents sleeping more than 8 hours per day had significantly higher reasoning ability than their peers who slept for less than 8 hours per day. Some studies reported that simpler cognitive processes such as working memory and computational speed may not be significantly affected by a single night of sleep limited to 4 to 5 hours. However, even mild sleep restriction of an hour or more, when persistent across days, can lead to memory problems as severe as seen following total sleep deprivation.

The sensitivity of the adolescent brain to subtle sleep impairments was highlighted in a study where 12-14-year-olds were allowed to play stimulating computer games or watch television right before bedtime. This experience prolonged sleep latency, increased stage 2 sleep and reduced slow wave sleep. This modest degree of sleep restriction significantly impaired verbal memory consolidation Suboptimal sleep duration in adolescents was also associated with poor performance on a serial digit-learning test during morning testing sessions, but not in afternoon sessions. Between 58-68% of high school students surveyed in Ontario report that they feel "really sleepy" between 8 and 10 A.M. Thus, achievement in early morning classes may suffer the most in sleep-deprived adolescents.

Fortunately, sleep only needs to be extended by a modest amount to enhance cognition in children. Sadeh showed that performance on memory, attention and vigilance tasks in children improved significantly after 1 hour of sleep extension on three consecutive nights. Gais and Backhaus have also shown the beneficial effects of sleep on memory consolidation in children and adolescents.

Overall, there is compelling scientific evidence that schoolchildren, particularly adolescents, are chronically sleep deprived, that the degree of sleep restriction they experience exerts demonstrable effects on memory encoding, consolidation and processing speed, and that even a modest increase in sleep will result in measurable improvements in cognitive function. The primary reason that adolescents are sleep deprived is due to a naturally occurring phase delay in their biological clock, resulting in a propensity to stay up until late in the evening which is incompatible with the early rise times schools typically require. Light treatments at the appropriate time can phase advance the biological clock, potentially reversing this problem.

The hypothesis that the investigators propose to test is that consistent morning use of the Litebook Edge™ bright light therapy device, coupled with two-hour pre-bedtime use of blue-wave light blocking glasses while watching video screens will shift the circadian phase of the sleep-wake cycle of normal adolescents. This in turn will enable them to fall asleep earlier and to receive an increased amount of sleep during the school week. Consequently, they will awaken more readily, feel more awake during early classes, and will perform better on tests of academic performance, attention and working memory. Light therapy will enhance functional connectivity of prefrontal regions involved in attention. Degree of improvement in cognition, attention and functional and structural MRI measures will be directly related to average time spent each day activating (and presumably using) the device, which will be the independent variable in the statistical analyses.

This is a one-arm study, and all participants will receive active treatment. The device was designed to monitor degree of use and the primary statistical question is whether there is a significant association between degree of use and improvement in measures of wakefulness, alertness, and cognitive performance.

This approach of using duration of device activation as the independent variable, in a small preliminary study, provides several advantages over a two-arm studying comparing bright white light to either placebo red light or another type of mechanical device. First, effect size measures previously calculated assumed that subjects in both groups would use the device. There will likely be significant variability between subjects in degree of use and if only a fraction of subjects assigned the bright light device used it consistently then the overall impact would be weaker and possibly missed in a two-group analysis. Using duration of device operation will enable the investigators to compare subjects who used it to a considerable degree versus subjects who hardly use it at all and would likely provide a good estimate of how much benefit accrues from different degrees of use.

This is particularly important for the neuroimaging component. If the investigators compared active versus placebo devices, then only half of the neuroimaged subjects would receive the active device, which may leave the investigators comparing pre versus post effects in only 8-10 subjects. In this revised design all the neuroimaged sample (n = 16-20) would receive the active treatment making the pre-post comparisons stronger, especially when adjusted for duration of device activation.

Second, using duration of device activation as the independent variable will markedly facilitate recruitment. If the investigators used a placebo device, they would need to indicate in the informed consent that subjects may receive a placebo device, without revealing what the placebo is. Instead, the investigators can now indicate in the informed consent that all subjects will receive a device that they believe is biologically active and that no placebos will be used.

This also makes the protocol simpler as raters do not need to be kept blind to device type. All the investigators need to do is make sure that raters remain unaware of duration of device activation.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Enrolled in school, drowsiness/sleepiness during morning classes which interferes to some degree with academic performance but able to wake up and be on time for said classes, willingness to use a device in the morning to enhance alertness, Intelligence Quotient greater than 80

Exclusion Criteria:

* Symptoms of psychiatric disorder on screening, current use of medications, home schooled, involved in morning activities, like athletics, that can alter morning alertness

Primary outcomes:
measure: Beta electroencephalographic (EEG) activity
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Theta electroencephalographic (EEG) activity
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Sleep onset
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Sleep duration
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Errors of omission
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Response variability
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Mathematical ability
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Simple computational speed
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Dentate gyrus volume
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
measure: Sleep propensity
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
Other outcomes:
measure: Functional connectivity during Go/No Go task
timeFrame: Baseline and week 4 (or last observation after baseline)
Locations:
city: Belmont
country: United States
facility: McLean Hospital
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Mclean Hospital
name: Martin H Teicher, MD,PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Backhaus J, Hoeckesfeld R, Born J, Hohagen F, Junghanns K. Immediate as well as delayed post learning sleep but not wakefulness enhances declarative memory consolidation in children. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008 Jan;89(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
citation: Banks S, Dinges DF. Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Aug 15;3(5):519-28.
citation: Born J, Rasch B, Gais S. Sleep to remember. Neuroscientist. 2006 Oct;12(5):410-24. doi: 10.1177/1073858406292647.
citation: Born J, Wagner U. Sleep, hormones, and memory. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009 Dec;36(4):809-29, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.10.001.
citation: Cajochen C. Alerting effects of light. Sleep Med Rev. 2007 Dec;11(6):453-64. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
citation: Carskadon MA, Acebo C, Jenni OG. Regulation of adolescent sleep: implications for behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:276-91. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.032.
citation: Carskadon MA, Harvey K, Dement WC. Sleep loss in young adolescents. Sleep. 1981 Sep;4(3):299-312. doi: 10.1093/sleep/4.3.299.
citation: Carvalho-Mendes RP, Dunster GP, de la Iglesia HO, Menna-Barreto L. Afternoon School Start Times Are Associated with a Lack of Both Social Jetlag and Sleep Deprivation in Adolescents. J Biol Rhythms. 2020 Aug;35(4):377-390. doi: 10.1177/0748730420927603. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
citation: Crowley SJ, Acebo C, Carskadon MA. Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescence. Sleep Med. 2007 Sep;8(6):602-12. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
citation: Curcio G, Ferrara M, De Gennaro L. Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. Sleep Med Rev. 2006 Oct;10(5):323-37. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.11.001. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
citation: Dewald JF, Meijer AM, Oort FJ, Kerkhof GA, Bogels SM. The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2010 Jun;14(3):179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.004. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
citation: Diekelmann S, Born J. The memory function of sleep. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):114-26. doi: 10.1038/nrn2762. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
citation: Dijk DJ, Beersma DG, Daan S, Lewy AJ. Bright morning light advances the human circadian system without affecting NREM sleep homeostasis. Am J Physiol. 1989 Jan;256(1 Pt 2):R106-11. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.1.R106.
citation: Durmer JS, Dinges DF. Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Semin Neurol. 2005 Mar;25(1):117-29. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-867080.
citation: Dworak M, Schierl T, Bruns T, Struder HK. Impact of singular excessive computer game and television exposure on sleep patterns and memory performance of school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):978-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0476.
citation: Fisher PM, Madsen MK, Mc Mahon B, Holst KK, Andersen SB, Laursen HR, Hasholt LF, Siebner HR, Knudsen GM. Three-week bright-light intervention has dose-related effects on threat-related corticolimbic reactivity and functional coupling. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 15;76(4):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.11.031. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
citation: Gais S, Hullemann P, Hallschmid M, Born J. Sleep-dependent surges in growth hormone do not contribute to sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006 Jul;31(6):786-91. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
citation: Gibson ES, Powles AC, Thabane L, O'Brien S, Molnar DS, Trajanovic N, Ogilvie R, Shapiro C, Yan M, Chilcott-Tanser L. "Sleepiness" is serious in adolescence: two surveys of 3235 Canadian students. BMC Public Health. 2006 May 2;6:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-116.
citation: Goel N, Rao H, Durmer JS, Dinges DF. Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Semin Neurol. 2009 Sep;29(4):320-39. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237117. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
citation: Hatori M, Panda S. The emerging roles of melanopsin in behavioral adaptation to light. Trends Mol Med. 2010 Oct;16(10):435-46. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
citation: Hysing M, Harvey AG, Linton SJ, Askeland KG, Sivertsen B. Sleep and academic performance in later adolescence: results from a large population-based study. J Sleep Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):318-24. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12373. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
citation: Kopasz M, Loessl B, Hornyak M, Riemann D, Nissen C, Piosczyk H, Voderholzer U. Sleep and memory in healthy children and adolescents - a critical review. Sleep Med Rev. 2010 Jun;14(3):167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.006. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
citation: Kramer Fiala Machado A, Wendt A, Baptista Menezes AM, Goncalves H, Wehrmeister FC. Sleep duration trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Findings from a population-based birth cohort. J Sleep Res. 2021 Jun;30(3):e13155. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13155. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
citation: Kuula L, Pesonen AK, Merikanto I, Gradisar M, Lahti J, Heinonen K, Kajantie E, Raikkonen K. Development of Late Circadian Preference: Sleep Timing From Childhood to Late Adolescence. J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:182-189.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.068. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
citation: O'Brien LM. The neurocognitive effects of sleep disruption in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009 Oct;18(4):813-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2009.04.008.
citation: Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo R, Chillon P, Labayen I, Martinez-Gomez D, Redondo C, Marcos A, Moreno LA; AVENA study group. Sleep duration and cognitive performance in adolescence. The AVENA study. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Mar;99(3):454-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01618.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26. No abstract available.
citation: Pilcher JJ, Walters AS. How sleep deprivation affects psychological variables related to college students' cognitive performance. J Am Coll Health. 1997 Nov;46(3):121-6. doi: 10.1080/07448489709595597.
citation: Randazzo AC, Muehlbach MJ, Schweitzer PK, Walsh JK. Cognitive function following acute sleep restriction in children ages 10-14. Sleep. 1998 Dec 15;21(8):861-8.
citation: Roberts RE, Roberts CR, Duong HT. Sleepless in adolescence: prospective data on sleep deprivation, health and functioning. J Adolesc. 2009 Oct;32(5):1045-57. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
citation: Rosenthal NE, Joseph-Vanderpool JR, Levendosky AA, Johnston SH, Allen R, Kelly KA, Souetre E, Schultz PM, Starz KE. Phase-shifting effects of bright morning light as treatment for delayed sleep phase syndrome. Sleep. 1990 Aug;13(4):354-61.
citation: Sadeh A, Gruber R, Raviv A. Sleep, neurobehavioral functioning, and behavior problems in school-age children. Child Dev. 2002 Mar-Apr;73(2):405-17. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00414.
citation: Sadeh A, Gruber R, Raviv A. The effects of sleep restriction and extension on school-age children: what a difference an hour makes. Child Dev. 2003 Mar-Apr;74(2):444-55. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402008.
citation: Sadeh A, Raviv A, Gruber R. Sleep patterns and sleep disruptions in school-age children. Dev Psychol. 2000 May;36(3):291-301. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.36.3.291.
citation: Suratt PM, Barth JT, Diamond R, D'Andrea L, Nikova M, Perriello VA Jr, Carskadon MA, Rembold C. Reduced time in bed and obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children are associated with cognitive impairment. Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119(2):320-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1969.
citation: Walker MP. Cognitive consequences of sleep and sleep loss. Sleep Med. 2008 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S29-34. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(08)70014-5.
citation: Wheaton AG, Olsen EO, Miller GF, Croft JB. Sleep Duration and Injury-Related Risk Behaviors Among High School Students--United States, 2007-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Apr 8;65(13):337-41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6513a1.