Clinical trial NCT05857540: The Effects of Upper-Extremity Plyometric Combined Strength Training in Overhead Athletes With Shoulder Instability
Official title: The Effects of Upper-Extremity Plyometric Combined Strength Training in Overhead Athletes With Shoulder Instability
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Glenohumeral Subluxation
Shoulder Subluxation
Shoulder Instability Subluxation Bilateral
Keywords: Plyometric
Strengthening
Overhead athlete
Shoulder instability
Lead sponsor: National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2023-05-12
Enrollment: 64
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 20
Maximum age (years): 40
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the additional effects of upper extremity plyometric training versus strength training alone in recreational overhead athletes with shoulder instability. The investigators hypothesis that compared to strengthening training alone, plyometric training combined with strengthening training will significantly improve shoulder isokinetic strength, proprioception, scapular kinematics, symptoms of shoulder instability, and shoulder function.

Detailed description: Background: Shoulder instability is a common problem in active young adults with a wide spectrum ranging from microinstability, subluxation to dislocation. In patients with instability of Stanmore polar type 2 or 3, recurrent shoulder instability may be related to abnormal movement patterns but not result from trauma. Non-operative management is suggested to this subgroup as the first-line treatment. Previous rehabilitation protocols including progressive shoulder muscles strengthening and neuromuscular control training have shown positive effects on functional outcomes in individuals with shoulder instability. Recent protocols for shoulder instability usually include various types of plyometric training to prepare injured athletes to return to sports. Plyometric training in lower extremity has been wildly used for knee injury prevention. In upper extremity, plyometrics also has been shown to improve isokinetic strength, throwing performance, and proprioception in healthy subjects and healthy overhead athletes. However, it is still not well-understood that whether a strengthening training combined with plyometrics would be more effective to improve shoulder neuromuscular control and shoulder function in subjects with instability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the additional effects of upper extremity plyometric training in recreational overhead athletes with anterior shoulder instability. The investigators hypothesis that compared to strengthening training alone, plyometric training combined with strengthening training will significantly improve strength, proprioception, shoulder kinematic and muscle activity, shoulder pain and shoulder function.

Methods: A total of 64 participants with anterior shoulder instability will be randomized to either an experimental group (plyometric and strengthening training) or a control group (strengthening training). Both groups will receive a 50-minute supervised training protocol twice a week for 6 weeks. The primary outcomes include (1) isokinetic assessment of internal and external rotation (peak torque, time to peak torque, and amortization time); (2) proprioception (active and passive joint position sense); (3) seated medicine ball throw test (distance in cm). The secondary outcomes include (1) shoulder pain and instability with 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS); (2) shoulder function assessed with the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; (3) Global rating of change (GRC). GRC will be measured after the end of 12 session of intervention, and all the other outcomes will be measured at baseline and following 12 sessions of exercise training. The two-way repeated measures ANOVAs will be used to compare primary and secondary outcome variables between groups. The significant level was set at 0.05.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Have experience of at least 1 of the following symptoms of shoulder instability during upper extremity movement: (a) pain, clicking, a sense of the shoulder coming apart, (b) dead-arm syndrome, or (c) subluxation of the joint.
2. Self-reported decreased performance or feeling fear to perform shoulder movements during sports or daily activities
3. Positive findings on ≥ 1 of the following 5 tests: load and shift test, apprehension, relocation, \& surprise tests, Gagey hyperabduction test, sulcus sign, Feagin test
4. Recreational overhead athletes who keep practicing ≥ 4 hours/week in the recent 1 month and with ≥ 1 year overhead sports experience

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Full contact sport athletes
2. Severe shoulder instability with \> 5 shoulder dislocations history
3. Obvious shoulder bony/labrum lesion in the dominant side warranted for surgery first as decided by the orthopedic surgeon
4. Previous surgery or fracture in the shoulder area on the dominant side within 1 year
5. Voluntary instability (the ability to deliberately dislocate one's shoulder)
6. During acute phase after shoulder dislocation event
7. Not suitable to start plyometric training yet: Shoulder muscle weakness (manual muscle test \<3) or range of motion limitation (\<90 abduction, \<70 external rotation) in the dominant side
8. Pregnancy
9. Cancer, neck pain, brain \& neurological impairment
10. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or Marfan syndrome
11. Unable to attend 6 weeks supervised training

Primary outcomes:
measure: Shoulder isokinetic muscle strength
timeFrame: Change from baseline shoulder isokinetic muscle strength through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
measure: Shoulder acceleration time, deceleration time, and amortization time
timeFrame: Change from baseline shoulder isokinetic muscle strength through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
measure: Shoulder proprioception
timeFrame: Change from baseline shoulder external rotation joint position sense through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
measure: Seated medicine ball throw distance
timeFrame: Change from baseline seated medicine ball throw distance through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Shoulder function
timeFrame: Change from baseline DASH questionnaire through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
measure: Visual analogue scale (VAS) of shoulder pain and instability
timeFrame: Change from baseline VAS of shoulder pain and instability through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
measure: Global rating of change (GRC)
timeFrame: through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Taipei
country: Taiwan
facility: National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
state: 台北市
Study officials:
affiliation: National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
name: Yin-Liang Lin, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: