Clinical trial NCT02479425: Two Points Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients
Official title: Two Pints Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Pressure Ulcer
Keywords: pressure ulcer
Positioning
Lead sponsor: University of Alexandria
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2015-06-24
Enrollment: 150
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 16
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

The aim of this study is to comparative the impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:

* Group 1: traditional three points rotation.
* Group 2: two points rotation.

Detailed description: Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

Aim of the study:

The aim of this study was designed to evaluate the comparative impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

Patients:

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:

* Group 1: traditional three points rotation.
* Group 2: two points rotation.

Methods:

The studied patients were subjected to:

Complete history taking, physical examination, primary ICU diagnosis, routine laboratory investigation and recording Glasgaw coma scale (GCS), use of sedation, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation

Patients in group 1 nursed by traditional protocol \[ two hours on the right side in 30 degree lateral position, two hours on the back and two hours on the left side in 30 degree lateral position\] Patients in group 2 nursed in lateral position with 30 degree two hours on the right and two hours on the left with elevation of the head of bed by 30 degree in the two groups.

both groups were monitored for bed sores incidence, timing and sites of occurence

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* patients admitted to critical care medicine department and expected to have long stay

Exclusion Criteria:

* active or healed bed sores

Primary outcomes:
measure: pressure ulcer occurence
timeFrame: 21 days
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
References: