Clinical trial NCT06199180: Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat PVI in Patients With Paroxysmal AF
Official title: Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Conventional Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Repeat
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent
Keywords: pulmonary vein isolation
pulsed field ablation
radiofrequency ablation
implantable cardiac monitor
Lead sponsor: University Medical Center Groningen
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Boston Scientific Corporation
First posted: 2024-01-10
Enrollment: 154
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: patients will be randomised to PFA or RFA for redo PVI
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Various methods exist for performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including thermal ablation and pulse-field ablation (PFA). However, in cases requiring a second PVI for recurrent AF, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is utilized in nearly 95% of instances post-acquiring a 3D high-density map from the left atrium (LA). Up to 85% of patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI exhibit pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, often identified as the cause of AF.

PFA has demonstrated its safety and efficiency compared to RFA as a swift technique for performing ablation. Yet, whether PFA or RFA stands out as superior or safer when applied for a second PVI remains unclear, as no randomized controlled trial has investigated this comparison. The proposed REPEAT-AF trial aims to randomize 154 AF patients experiencing recurrent AF after the initial PVI, assigning them in a 1:1 ratio to either RFA or PFA. Each patient will receive an implantable cardiac monitor to precisely detect any AF recurrences.

Detailed description: All participating patients are required to provide written (or equivalent) informed consent, indicated by a dated signature of the subject or legal representative. The consent process must comply with applicable national regulations and use language understandable by the patient.

The study will be conducted at 6 clinical centres/investigational sites across the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into a PFA or point-by-point RF ablation arm. Randomization will occur prior to the ablation procedure. A implantable cardiac monitor will be implanted in all randomised patients one month before ablation to accurately monitor any AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/ atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Treatment allocation will be processed through the Dutch 'National Heart Registry' (NHR) data platform.

Patients randomized to both arms of the study will be evaluated for PV isolation at the start of the ablation procedure. If PV reconnection is identified in patients in the point-by-point RF arm, re-ablation will occur according to the study protocol. Patients in the PFA arm will have PV reconnection determined using the FARAWAVE catheter. Those with no PV reconnection (100% PV isolation/durable PVI) will be followed in an observational registry.

The PFA ablation arm involves the use of the Farastar generator system, Farawave ablation catheter, and Faradrive steering catheter for the procedure. The RF point-by-point ablation arm (control) involves RF ablation following standard practice.

Eligibility criteria: Subjects who meet all of the following inclusion criteria at screening will be eligible for enrolment:

* Patient had 1 previous PVI with either cryoballoon, RF ablation or PFA
* Index PVI occurred within \<5 years prior to enrolment
* Documented AF recurrence \>30 seconds
* Symptomatic AF
* Paroxysmal AF
* Age \>18 and \<80 years
* Willing and capable to provide informed consent
* Able and willing to participate in all examinations and follow-up visits and tests associated with this clinical study

Subjects who meet ANY of the following exclusion criteria will be excluded from the study:

* Persistent AF (by diagnosis of duration \>7 days)
* Concomitant/ prior diagnosis for atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFl). Note typical cavotricuspid isthmus dependent flutter is not an exclusion criterium.
* Underwent additional ablations outside the pulmonary veins during index AF ablation
* AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol abuse, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes
* Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systematic anticoagulation
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<30% as documented by transthoracic echo (TTE) (within \<3 months prior)
* Left atrial volume index \>60 ml/m2
* Clinically significant arrhythmias other than AF
* Previous surgery for AF
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
* Presence of intramural thrombus, tumour or other abnormality that precludes safe catheter introduction or manipulation
* BMI \>35 kg/m2
* Significant or symptomatic hypotension, bradycardia, or chronotropic incompetence
* Chronic renal insufficiency of \<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or any history of renal dialysis, or history of renal transplant
* Hemodynamically significant valvular disease
* Presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD) closure device
* History of abnormal bleeding and/or clotting disorder
* History of rheumatic fever
* Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any lung disease. Only if involving abnormal blood gases or significant dyspnoea
* Clinically significant systemic infection or sepsis
* Life expectancy \<1 year
* Sensitivity to contrast media not controlled by pre-medication
* Any of the following within the 3 months prior to enrolment:

  * Myocardial infarction
  * Unstable angina
  * Percutaneous coronary intervention
  * Heart failure hospitalization
  * Stroke or TIA
  * Significant bleeding
  * Pericarditis/effusions
  * Left atrial thrombus
* Coronary artery bypass grafting/atriotomy within 6 months prior
* Organ or haematologic transplant, or currently being evaluated for an organ transplant
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Primary outcomes:
measure: To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.
timeFrame: 12 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: To compare the efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PFA or point-by-point RF ablation.
timeFrame: 24 months
measure: Repeat PVI within 12 and 24 months of randomization
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: AF burden with and without 3 months blanking period
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: Change in quality of life
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: Change in quality of life as affected by AF
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: AF hospitalisation / urgent visit
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: Cost-effectiveness
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months
measure: Rate of ischemic stroke
timeFrame: 12 and 24 months (efficacy)
measure: Complications of ablation
timeFrame: 0-30 days post ablation
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Groningen
country: Netherlands
facility: UMCG
Study officials:
affiliation: UMCG
name: Yuri Blaauw, Dr.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: