Clinical trial NCT03279757: Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Anesthetics IIIb
Official title: Parameters in Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Topical Anesthetics: Role of Anesthetic and Application Time
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Local Anesthesia of the Skin
Keywords: Fractional laser
Topical anesthesia
Drug delivery
CO2 laser
Lead sponsor: Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-09-12
Enrollment: 15
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: FACTORIAL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study are to compare the efficacy of two different commercially available local anesthetics on AFXL pretreated skin and to assess the role of the application time in this technique.

Detailed description: Rationale: In dermatology anesthetics are frequently injected or topically applied to achieve local anesthesia. Injectable anesthetics are effective but uncomfortable during administration, especially for people who are needle phobic. Application of topical anesthesia is painless but time consuming and often only partial aesthesia is achieved due to the barrier function of the stratum corneum. (Manuskiatti, Triwongwaranat et al. 2010) Penetration of local anesthetics could be enhanced by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional lasers (AFXL) which locally disrupts the stratum corneum by creating an array of microscopic ablation channels. (Sklar, Burnett et al. 2014) In a previous pilot study, conducted at our institute, we demonstrated that effective anesthesia could be achieved within ten minutes after application of a topical anesthetic on skin pretreated with AFXL at painless settings. (Meesters, Bakker et al. 2015) However, little is still known about the role of the type of anesthetic the type of anesthetic and the application time on the efficacy of the anesthesia.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of two different commercially available local anesthetics on AFXL pretreated skin, a low concentration articaine solution and a high concentration lidocaine/tetracaine cream. We also aim to compare the efficacy of AFXL assisted topical anesthesia after various different application times.

Study design: Prospective, single blinded, randomized, controlled, within subject, pilot study.

Study population: 15 healthy volunteers ≥18 years, who give written informed consent

Intervention: In each subject, six test regions on subject's back of 1x1 cm will be pretreated with the fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser at 2.5 mJ and 15% density and will be randomly allocated to application of (I) articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml + epinephrine 10 μg/ml 30 solution (AHES) (5 minutes application time), (II) AHES (15 minutes application time), (III) AHES (25 minutes application time), (IV) lidocaine 70 mg/g + tetracaine 70 mg/g cream (LTC) (5 minutes application time, (V) LTC (15 minutes application time), (VI) LTC (25 minutes application time). After 15 minutes a pain stimulus, consisting of a pass with the fractional CO2 laser at 50 mJ and 5% density (scanned area 6x6 mm), will be given at each test region. In addition, a reference pain stimulus with the CO2 laser at the same settings will be given at unanesthetized skin. Subjects will be asked to indicate pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) directly after each pain stimulus

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Fitzpatrick skin type I or II
* Age ≥18 years
* Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation or complicated wound healing
* Presence of any active skin disease
* Known allergy to local anesthesia
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Incompetency to understand what the procedure involves
* Current complaints of chronic pain or other alterations in pain sensation (e.g. due to diabetes mellitus or lepra)
* Current treatment with systemic analgesics or other medication that can influence pain sensation
* Current treatment with anticoagulants
* Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI
* Excessive sun tan

Primary outcomes:
measure: Pain score
timeFrame: After 5 minutes application time of the anesthetics
measure: Pain score
timeFrame: After 15 minutes application time of the anesthetics
measure: Pain score
timeFrame: After 25 minutes application time of the anesthetics
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Pain score
timeFrame: Directly after pretreatment.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
name: Albert Wolkerstorfer, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
name: Menno A De Rie, MD, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References:
citation: Meesters AA, Bakker MM, de Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A. Fractional CO2 laser assisted delivery of topical anesthetics: A randomized controlled pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):208-11. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22376. Epub 2015 May 29.
citation: Sklar LR, Burnett CT, Waibel JS, Moy RL, Ozog DM. Laser assisted drug delivery: a review of an evolving technology. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):249-62. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22227. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
citation: Oni G, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. Can fractional lasers enhance transdermal absorption of topical lidocaine in an in vivo animal model? Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Feb;44(2):168-74. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21130. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
citation: Oni G, Rasko Y, Kenkel J. Topical lidocaine enhanced by laser pretreatment: a safe and effective method of analgesia for facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):854-61. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13496248.
citation: Ong MW, Bashir SJ. Fractional laser resurfacing for acne scars: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
citation: Manuskiatti W, Triwongwaranat D, Varothai S, Eimpunth S, Wanitphakdeedecha R. Efficacy and safety of a carbon-dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing device for treatment of atrophic acne scars in Asians. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Aug;63(2):274-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.051.
citation: Wolfe JW, Butterworth JF. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: update on mechanisms and treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):561-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a9394.
citation: Hahn IH, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. EMLA-induced methemoglobinemia and systemic topical anesthetic toxicity. J Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.03.003.
citation: Haedersdal M, Sakamoto FH, Farinelli WA, Doukas AG, Tam J, Anderson RR. Fractional CO(2) laser-assisted drug delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):113-22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20860.
citation: Bachhav YG, Heinrich A, Kalia YN. Controlled intra- and transdermal protein delivery using a minimally invasive Erbium:YAG fractional laser ablation technology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013 Jun;84(2):355-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
citation: Haak CS, Farinelli WA, Tam J, Doukas AG, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-assisted delivery of methyl aminolevulinate: Impact of laser channel depth and incubation time. Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Dec;44(10):787-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22102. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
citation: Haak CS, Bhayana B, Farinelli WA, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. The impact of treatment density and molecular weight for fractional laser-assisted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012 Nov 10;163(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
citation: Tierney EP, Hanke CW. Fractionated carbon dioxide laser treatment of photoaging: prospective study in 45 patients and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1279-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02082.x.
citation: Paasch U, Haedersdal M. Laser systems for ablative fractional resurfacing. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011 Jan;8(1):67-83. doi: 10.1586/erd.10.74.
citation: Farkas JP, Richardson JA, Burrus CF, Hoopman JE, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. In vivo histopathologic comparison of the acute injury following treatment with five fractional ablative laser devices. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):457-64. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10373060.
citation: Hantash BM, Bedi VP, Chan KF, Zachary CB. Ex vivo histological characterization of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):87-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20405.
citation: Taudorf EH, Haak CS, Erlendsson AM, Philipsen PA, Anderson RR, Paasch U, Haedersdal M. Fractional ablative erbium YAG laser: histological characterization of relationships between laser settings and micropore dimensions. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):281-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22228. Epub 2014 Feb 5.