Clinical trial NCT04509557: [177Lu]Ludotadipep Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
Official title: [177Lu]Ludotadipep Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase I Clinical Trial.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Keywords: Prostate Cancer
Lead sponsor: FutureChem
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2020-08-12
Enrollment: 30
Sex: MALE
Minimum age (years): 20
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SEQUENTIAL
Intervention model description: Dose is administered by differentiated into 5 groups (6 subjects each) and sequentially elevated starting from a low dose to a high dose (50±5 mCi, 75±8 mCi, 100±10 mCi, 125±13 mCi, 150±15 mCi).
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The study aims to evaluate the stability and efficacy after administration of \[177Lu\]Ludotadipep in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with dose-escalation applied to determine the appropriate dose.

Detailed description: \[18F\]PSMA PET/CT is conducted at the 2nd screening and only PSMA PET/CT positive patients can be enrolled (PSMA RADS 4 or more).

Dose is administered by differentiated into 5 groups (6 subjects each) and sequentially elevated starting from a low dose to a high dose (50±5 mCi, 75±8 mCi, 100±10 mCi, 125±13 mCi, 150±15 mCi).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Among prostate cancer patients with blood testosterone ≤50ng/dL, mCRPC patients showing radiological progression after standard taxene-based anticancer treatment and 2nd generation hormone agent (abiraterone, enzalutamed, or both)) treatment or patients who are not eligible for such standard medical treatment at the discretion of an investigator or patients who refuse such standard treatment
2. Patients who are positive on the \[18F\]PSMA PET/CT imaging
3. Subjects who were fully informed by an investigator of the study objectives, details, and characteristics of the study drug prior to study enrollment, and had an informed consent form signed by the subject or caretaker or legally acceptable representative
4. Male patients aged 20 years or older
5. Subjects who are sexually active and have a female partner of childbearing potential should meet the followings

   * Subjects should consent to practice contraception by continuously using a male condom from screening, throughout the study, and for at least 6 months after the last dose of the study drug
   * Subjects should never donate sperms from screening, throughout the study, and for at least 6 months after the last dose of the study drug
   * Subjects with a partner who is a woman of childbearing potential (including a pregnant or breastfeeding mother) should consent to maintain sexual abstinence or practice double contraception throughout the study \* Double contraception: Corresponding to 2 or more of the followings - use of a condom, use of a non-hormonal intrauterine device, use of a diaphragm, use of a cervical cap, a sexual partner who has been vasectomized at least 3 months (as of the first screening visit) or a sexual partner medically diagnosed to be sterile
6. ECOG _ Performance score ≤2
7. Life expectancy ≥6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects determined by an investigator to have a serious medical condition making study conduct difficult
2. Subjects corresponding to the following conditions 1) Glomerular filtration rate ≤40 ml/min, 2) hemoglobin level ≤10.0 g/dL, 3) white cell count ≤4.0 × 109/L, 4) platelet count ≤100 × 109/L, 5) total bilirubin level ≥1.5 x upper normal limit, 6) serum albumin level ≤3.0 g/dL, 7) active ischemic heart disease or heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification III-IV), 8) uncontrolled diabetes/hypertension, 9) hyperkalemia \>6.0 mmol/L
3. Vulnerable subjects (the investigator involved in the study or his/her family, research staff or students of the investigator involved in the study)
4. Patients with a persistent malignancy other than the prostate cancer
5. Patients who participated in a therapeutic clinical trial within the past 30 days and administered an investigational product other than standard treatment
6. Patients are excluded if treatment other than the treatment provided in this study is determined more appropriate as determined by the investigator based on the patient and disease characteristics

Primary outcomes:
measure: Dose-limiting toxicity
timeFrame: From date of randomization (IP administration (0h, visit3, Day 0 ~ 3)) until the date of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, other grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity resulting from [177Lu]Ludotadipep, persisting for 5 days or more.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: PSA level assessment
timeFrame: screening(Day -31 ~ -20), , visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Radiological assessment
timeFrame: 2nd screeing(Day -19 ~ -1 ), visit7(Day31), visit9(Day59)
measure: Biodistribution
timeFrame: 2 hours, 24 hours (1 day), 48 hours (2 days), 72 hours (3 days) at visit3 (Day 0~3), visit 4(Day10)
measure: Whole-body absorbed dose
timeFrame: 2 hours, 24 hours (1 day), 48 hours (2 days), 72 hours (3 days) at visit3(Day 0~3)
measure: Safety assessment by baseline symptoms
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1)
measure: Safety assessment by adverse events
timeFrame: visit 3(Day 0 ~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Number of participants with abnormal signs and symptom as assessed through physical examination
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day 10), visit5 (Day 17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Body temperature (degrees Celsius)
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Pulse rate (beats per minute)
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), 2nd screening(Day -19 ~ -1), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Number of participants with abnormal hematology values
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Number of participants with abnormal chemistry values
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
measure: Number of participants with abnormal urinalysis values
timeFrame: Screening(Day -31 ~ -20), visit 3(Day 0~3), visit4 (Day10), visit5 (Day17), visit6(Day24), visit7(Day31), visit8(Day45), visit9(Day59), visit10 (Day87)
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Seoul
country: Korea, Republic of
facility: The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, St, Mary's Hospital, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu
Study officials:
affiliation: The Catholic University of Korea
name: Ji Youl Lee
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Zhou J, Neale JH, Pomper MG, Kozikowski AP. NAAG peptidase inhibitors and their potential for diagnosis and therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Dec;4(12):1015-26. doi: 10.1038/nrd1903.
citation: Mease RC, Foss CA, Pomper MG. PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(8):951-62. doi: 10.2174/1568026611313080008.
citation: Lutje S, Heskamp S, Cornelissen AS, Poeppel TD, van den Broek SA, Rosenbaum-Krumme S, Bockisch A, Gotthardt M, Rijpkema M, Boerman OC. PSMA Ligands for Radionuclide Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Clinical Status. Theranostics. 2015 Oct 18;5(12):1388-401. doi: 10.7150/thno.13348. eCollection 2015.
citation: Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Apr;13(4):226-35. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
citation: Haberkorn U, Eder M, Kopka K, Babich JW, Eisenhut M. New Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):9-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0820.