Clinical trial NCT06773468: Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization Vehicles
Official title: Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization for Stress Management in University Students
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Stress
Coping
Digital Intervention
University Students
Keywords: stress
coping
digital intervention
self-directed
online resource
university students
Lead sponsor: McGill University
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2025-01-14
Enrollment: 313
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 29
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: The present study examined the comparative effectiveness of self-directed (video, infographic) vs. non-self directed (workshop) modalities of online stress management resources and an inactive control condition in terms of their effectiveness and acceptability for university students.

Detailed description: University students have been reporting high levels of stress, which have been found to negatively impact their academic performance and overall well-being. Given these elevated levels of stress, a large number of students report using unhealthy coping behaviours such as alcohol and drug use or risky sexual behaviours to cope with daily stressors. High levels of stress can be harmful to students' quality of life and well-being (both physical and mental), as well as elevated stress over an extended period can hinder academic performance. To address the overwhelming demands for wellness services, online approaches to delivering stress management and well-being supports are being used on campuses as supplemental means of promoting student stress management, coping capacity, and well-being.

Growing research on the barriers associated with help-seeking and changes due to the pandemic have spurred a shift from in-person supports to online self-directed modalities. Evidence from research measuring the acceptability of digital mental health interventions in university students suggests that students rate these interventions with moderate to high acceptability, but students report concerns around the use of certain digital modalities such as privacy, credibility, and lack of guidance on how to get started and use the interventions. Research has demonstrated how these types of online support can be effective at enhancing university student well-being and decreasing stress. For example, an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to synthesize the literature on digital mental health interventions in higher education found that most interventions were effective at decreasing depression symptoms, anxiety, and stress in this context. Specifically, skills-training and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions were found to be effective. However, it is important to highlight that the authors found that the effectiveness depended on the modality or delivery format of the intervention. Although there is evidence for their individual effectiveness when compared to inactive control groups, it is crucial to have a better theoretical understanding of their relative effectiveness to one another to make research-informed decisions in selecting instructional approaches to support students' coping capacity in higher education.

Therefore, the overarching objective of the current study is to investigate how stress management knowledge can be effectively put into action within the university context by comparing different modalities. The study seeks to investigate differences in response to self-directed vs. non self-directed approaches to sharing stress management knowledge with students against a control group, specifically in terms of acceptability and change over time on wellness outcomes while accounting for the role of strategy use frequency. Specifically, the first objective (1.1) was to compare and evaluate self-directed, non self-directed, and an inactive control group by assessing effectiveness as demonstrated in changes (pre/post/follow-up) on wellness outcomes (i.e., perceived stress, coping capacity, mindfulness, coping self-efficacy, and well-being), while (1.2) examining the role of strategy use frequency. The second objective (2) is to further examine specific differences between commonly used knowledge mobilization modalities for stress management strategies (workshop, video, infographic) and an inactive control group by assessing (2.1) acceptability (i.e., likelihood of use, satisfaction) and (2.2) effectiveness as demonstrated in changes (pre/post/follow-up) on the same wellness outcomes while (2.3) examining the role of strategy use frequency.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Current university student

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Stress
timeFrame: Week 0, 4, and 7
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in Satisfaction
timeFrame: Week 4 and 7
measure: Change in coping capacity
timeFrame: Week 0, 4, and 7
measure: Change in mindfulness
timeFrame: Week 0, 4, and 7
measure: Change in coping self-efficacy
timeFrame: Week 0, 4, and 7
measure: Change in well-being
timeFrame: Week 0, 4, and 7
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Montréal
country: Canada
facility: McGill University
state: Quebec
Study officials:
References:
citation: Harith S, Backhaus I, Mohbin N, Ngo HT, Khoo S. Effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for university students: an umbrella review. PeerJ. 2022 Mar 31;10:e13111. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13111. eCollection 2022.
citation: Lattie EG, Adkins EC, Winquist N, Stiles-Shields C, Wafford QE, Graham AK. Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 22;21(7):e12869. doi: 10.2196/12869.
citation: Bourdon JL, Moore AA, Long EC, Kendler KS, Dick DM. The relationship between on-campus service utilization and common mental health concerns in undergraduate college students. Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):118-126. doi: 10.1037/ser0000296. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
citation: LaMontagne LG, Doty JL, Diehl DC, Nesbit TS, Gage NA, Kumbkarni N, Leon SP. Acceptability, usage, and efficacy of mindfulness apps for college student mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. J Affect Disord. 2024 Dec 15;367:951-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
citation: Harrer M, Adam SH, Baumeister H, Cuijpers P, Karyotaki E, Auerbach RP, Kessler RC, Bruffaerts R, Berking M, Ebert DD. Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1759. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1759. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
citation: Kern A, Hong V, Song J, Lipson SK, Eisenberg D. Mental health apps in a college setting: openness, usage, and attitudes. Mhealth. 2018 Jun 30;4:20. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.06.01. eCollection 2018.
citation: Frazier P, Gabriel A, Merians A, Lust K. Understanding stress as an impediment to academic performance. J Am Coll Health. 2019 Aug-Sep;67(6):562-570. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1499649. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
citation: Metzger IW, Blevins C, Calhoun CD, Ritchwood TD, Gilmore AK, Stewart R, Bountress KE. An examination of the impact of maladaptive coping on the association between stressor type and alcohol use in college. J Am Coll Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;65(8):534-541. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2017.1351445. Epub 2017 Jul 14.