Clinical trial NCT06012266: Repurposing Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin for Paediatric Heart Failure: Translational Approach and Dose Rationale
Official title: Dose Rationale for Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Paediatric Heart Failure: a Phase II.a Pharmacokinetics, Ease-of-swallow, Safety and Proof-of-concept Study Among Children 6-18 Years of Age
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Heart Failure
Keywords: child
Lead sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
name: University College, London
First posted: 2023-08-25
Enrollment: 12
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 6
Maximum age (years): 18
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: Order of drug intake will be balanced and randomized, with 6 patients starting with Dapagliflozin (Visits 1-2) and subsequently switching to Empagliflozin (Visits 3-4), and 6 patients starting with Empagliflozin (Visits 1-2) and subsequently switching to Dapagliflozin (Visits 3-4).
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study aims at exploring the use of Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in children and adolescents 6-18 years old with heart failure. These molecules are effective in reducing hospitalisations and mortality in adults with heart failure and are used in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but little is known on children with heart failure. Particularly, the best dose to use in this population is currently unknown. This trial aims to:

1. define a dose rationale for this indication and age group (pharmacokinetic study),
2. assess and monitor safety,
3. assess ease-of-swallow,
4. explore middle-term (4-6 weeks) efficacy and efficacy markers.

Participants will be asked to attend 4 study visits over 4-6 weeks, and one end-study visit 2-12 weeks thereafter. Visits 1 and 3 will entail an 8h day-hospital stay, while Visits 2, 4 and the end-study visit will be outpatient clinics (approximately 2h). Participants will be asked to take the studied drug once daily during the 4-6 weeks of the study period.

All participants will take both Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin: 6 will start with Dapagliflozin first (Visits 1-2) and then switch to Empagliflozin (Visits 3-4), while 6 will start with Empagliflozin first (Visits 1-2) and then switch to Dapagliflozin (Visits 3-4). No comparison group is foreseen for this study.

Detailed description: Paediatric heart failure is a relevant healthcare issue, with almost 15'000 yearly hospitalizations just in the USA. Sadly, current heart failure therapy in Paediatrics is still unsatisfactory, with high in-hospital (7-26%), and 5-year mortality (30%-50%).

Among the recent improvements in adult heart failure management, impressive is the discovery that Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin are able to reduce cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure by 25% on top of optimal medical therapy. Indeed, since 2021, they have been recommended as part of standard heart failure therapy.

In the past, paediatric heart failure trials often failed, mainly because of suboptimal dose or inappropriate formulations and endpoints.

This phase II.a, cross-over, open-label trial is designed to characterize pharmacokinetics (primary outcome), palatability, safety and explore potential efficacy markers (secondary outcomes) of Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in 12 heart failure children, so to inform the design and performance of subsequent, state-of-the-art, high-quality efficacy trials.

Participants will first receive Drug A (either Dapagliflozin, n=6, or Empagliflozin, n=6) during 3-5 weeks, followed by the other molecule (Drug B) for 2 weeks. They will have 4 visits, one end-study visit and 11-15 pharmacokinetic samples (depending on their weight). The timing of these samples will be optimized exploiting contemporary modeling and simulation techniques.

Safety evaluation will occur throughout the study, while palatability will be evaluated at Visits 1 (Drug A) and 3 (Dug B), and efficacy markers at Visits 1, 3 and 4.

Pharmacokinetic modeling will characterize primary and secondary pharmacokinetic parameters and allow to define the optimal paediatric dose, informing both current compassionate-care use and the design of future efficacy trials.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Children 6 to 18 years of age, followed either as in- or outpatients at the Heart failure unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London or at the Paediatric Cardiology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland will be eligible for inclusion.
* Currently on heart failure medication (any drug or any combination).
* Patients should potentially benefit from adding a SGLT2i (as judged by the treating physician and the local PI or Co-PI).
* Patients need to be on stable medical treatment, defined as no new heart failure drug started over the preceding 2 weeks and no major drug dose modification (apart minor adaptations, like weight adaptations, rounding or formulation changes) during the 2 weeks prior to enrolment.
* Adolescents, respectively parents or caregivers of children, capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inability to understand and go through the informed consent procedure.
* Inability to receive medications per os or through a nasogastric tube.
* Patients on either Insulin or Metformin will be excluded from participation. This implies the exclusion of patients with Diabetes mellitus (either type 1 or type 2 or other rare forms) necessitating either insulin or metformin.
* Type 1 Diabetes mellitus or any underlying metabolic disease associated with hypoglycaemias.
* Body weight \<13kg.
* Current smokers (defined as \>1 cigarette/week).
* Use of any other nicotine-delivering product (e.g. nicotine patches).
* Any known illicit drug abuse.
* Active chronic HBV, HCV or HIV.
* Any major surgery within 4 weeks of first dose administration.
* Blood transfusion recipient within 4 weeks of dose administration.
* eGFR =\<45mL/min/1.73m2 (simplified Schwartz formula).
* K+ \>6.5mmol/L.
* Blood glucose \<4mmol/L.
* There are no blood pressure exclusion criteria foreseen, but participants need to be haemodynamically stable, as assessed by the local investigator (board-certified paediatric cardiologist).
* Sustained or symptomatic arrhythmia insufficiently controlled with drug and/or device therapy.
* Cardio-surgical procedure within the 2 months prior to Visit 1, or interventional cardiac catheterization within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1, or the patient is planned to undergo cardiac surgery or an interventional cardiac catheterization during the study period (i.e. in the 6 weeks following Visit 1).
* Post-menarchal female patients of childbearing potential cannot be included.
* Known lactose intolerance, galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption.
* Known allergies to excipients of either Dapagliflozin or Empagliflozin.
* Significant medical history of active severe medical disease.
* Significant liver disease, Child Pugh Class C, or significant laboratory abnormalities at enrolment.
* Significant gastroenterological or hepatic disease that could significantly impair absorption or metabolism of orally administered drugs.
* Any medical co-morbidity, which is deemed incompatible (or only with relevant risk) with study participation by the treating clinician and/or the study investigator.
* Active urinary tract infection (being treated with antibiotics at the moment of Visit 1) or other relevant bacterial infection, as judged by the treating clinician and/or the study investigator.
* The patient is currently participating in another interventional clinical trial or has participated in such a trial during the \<14 days before Visit 1 (or if enrolment in this study is incompatible with the protocol of that preceding trial).

Primary outcomes:
measure: Pharmacokinetics 1: Dapagliflozin, respectively Empagliflozin half-life
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Pharmacokinetics 2: Dapagliflozin, respectively Empagliflozin Volume of distribution
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Pharmacokinetics 3: Dapagliflozin, respectively Empagliflozin AUC
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Safety 1 - eGFR
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Safety 2 - Occurrence of hypoglycemia
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Safety 3 - Occurrence of ketoacidosis
timeFrame: Visits 1-4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 2 = week 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Ease-of-swallow
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 3 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 1 - Heart failure severity class
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 2 - NT-proBNP level
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 3 - Echocardiography 1: Left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd)
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 4 - Echocardiography 2: Left-ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESd)
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 5 - Echocardiography 3: Fractional shortening (FS)
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy and efficacy markers (exploratory) 6 - Echocardiography 4: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF)
timeFrame: Visits 1, 3 and 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 3 = week 3 to 5, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
Other outcomes:
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 1: body weight (kg)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 2: heart rate (bpm)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 3: blood pressure (SBP/DBP, mmHg)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 4: b-hydroxybutyrate (mmol/L)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 5: haemoglobin (g/L)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
measure: Efficacy markers (exploratory), Mechanistic insights - 6: uric acid (mmol/L)
timeFrame: Visit 1, Visit 4 (Visit 1 = day 1, Visit 4 = week 4 to 6 after study start)
Locations:
city: Lausanne
country: Switzerland
facility: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
state: VD
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: University College London
state: Greater London
city: London
country: United Kingdom
facility: Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
state: Greater London
Study officials:
affiliation: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
name: Sebastiano A.G. Lava, MD MSc
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Das BB. Current State of Pediatric Heart Failure. Children (Basel). 2018 Jun 28;5(7):88. doi: 10.3390/children5070088.
citation: Rossano JW, Kim JJ, Decker JA, Price JF, Zafar F, Graves DE, Morales DL, Heinle JS, Bozkurt B, Towbin JA, Denfield SW, Dreyer WJ, Jefferies JL. Prevalence, morbidity, and mortality of heart failure-related hospitalizations in children in the United States: a population-based study. J Card Fail. 2012 Jun;18(6):459-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
citation: Ahmed H, VanderPluym C. Medical management of pediatric heart failure. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Feb;11(1):323-335. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-358.
citation: Andrews RE, Fenton MJ, Dominguez T, Burch M; British Congenital Cardiac Association. Heart failure from heart muscle disease in childhood: a 5-10 year follow-up study in the UK and Ireland. ESC Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;3(2):107-114. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12082. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
citation: Newland DM, Law YM, Albers EL, Friedland-Little JM, Ahmed H, Kemna MS, Hong BJ. Early Clinical Experience with Dapagliflozin in Children with Heart Failure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Jan;44(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02983-0. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
citation: Towbin JA, Lowe AM, Colan SD, Sleeper LA, Orav EJ, Clunie S, Messere J, Cox GF, Lurie PR, Hsu D, Canter C, Wilkinson JD, Lipshultz SE. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1867-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1867.
citation: McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Kober L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Belohlavek J, Bohm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukat A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O'Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjostrand M, Langkilde AM; DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
citation: Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Januzzi J, Verma S, Tsutsui H, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Kimura K, Schnee J, Zeller C, Cotton D, Bocchi E, Bohm M, Choi DJ, Chopra V, Chuquiure E, Giannetti N, Janssens S, Zhang J, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, Kaul S, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone S, Pina I, Ponikowski P, Sattar N, Senni M, Seronde MF, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Wanner C, Zannad F; EMPEROR-Reduced Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
citation: Authors/Task Force Members:; McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jan;24(1):4-131. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.
citation: Cella M, Knibbe C, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O. What is the right dose for children? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;70(4):597-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03591.x. No abstract available.
citation: Benjamin DK Jr, Smith PB, Jadhav P, Gobburu JV, Murphy MD, Hasselblad V, Baker-Smith C, Califf RM, Li JS. Pediatric antihypertensive trial failures: analysis of end points and dose range. Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):834-40. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.108886. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
citation: European Union. Ethical considerations for clinical trials on medicinal products conducted with the paediatric population. Eur J Health Law. 2008 Jul;15(2):223-50. doi: 10.1163/157180908x333228.
citation: Bellanti F, Della Pasqua O. Modelling and simulation as research tools in paediatric drug development. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;67 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0974-3. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
citation: Bellanti F, Di Iorio VL, Danhof M, Della Pasqua O. Sampling Optimization in Pharmacokinetic Bridging Studies: Example of the Use of Deferiprone in Children With beta-Thalassemia. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;56(9):1094-103. doi: 10.1002/jcph.708. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
citation: Lava SA, Simonetti GD, Bianchetti AA, Ferrarini A, Bianchetti MG. Prevention of vitamin D insufficiency in Switzerland: a never-ending story. Int J Pharm. 2013 Nov 30;457(1):353-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.068. No abstract available.
citation: Braunwald E. Gliflozins in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2022 May 26;386(21):2024-2034. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2115011. No abstract available.
citation: Zelniker TA, Braunwald E. Mechanisms of Cardiorenal Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 4;75(4):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.031.
citation: Joshi SS, Singh T, Newby DE, Singh J. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor therapy: mechanisms of action in heart failure. Heart. 2021 Jun 11;107(13):1032-1038. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318060.