Clinical trial NCT04445662: Financial Incentives for Homeless Smokers: A Community-based RCT
Official title: Financial Incentives for Homeless Smokers: A Community-based RCT
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Tobacco Smoking
Keywords: Smoking Cessation
Homelessness
Financial Incentives
Lead sponsor: Massachusetts General Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
name: National Institutes of Health (NIH)
First posted: 2020-06-24
Enrollment: 184
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This community-based randomized controlled trial will test the effect of contingent financial rewards on smoking abstinence among homeless-experienced adult cigarette smokers. Participants will be recruited from 3 Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program locations: a shelter clinic, a day center clinic, and a medical center clinic. All participants will be offered a varenicline prescription and tobacco coaching. Incentive arm participants will receive escalating financial rewards for saliva cotinine levels \<30 ng/ml, assessed 10 times over 12 weeks. Embedded qualitative interviews will explore the mechanisms of on-treatment and post-treatment effects of financial incentives on smoking abstinence in the context of homelessness.

Detailed description: People experiencing homelessness have a 3.5-fold higher prevalence of cigarette smoking in comparison to non-homeless people, contributing to 2-fold higher rates of lung cancer and 3- to 5-fold higher rates of tobacco-attributable death. Homeless smokers want to quit, but studies have not yet uncovered the optimal approach to help them do so. In an 8-week pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP), we found that financial incentives for smoking abstinence were associated with 7-fold higher odds of brief smoking abstinence in comparison to a non-incentivized control condition. These results suggest that financial incentives are a promising approach for reducing smoking in this vulnerable population, but further investigation in a larger sample is needed to improve the duration of on-treatment abstinence, assess post-treatment effects, and better understand mechanisms of action and contextual factors that may influence treatment response.

To address the above gaps in evidence, we will conduct a community-based RCT of financial incentives for smoking abstinence among adult smokers at BHCHP. Recognized as a leader in homeless health care, BHCHP serves 12,000 currently and formerly homeless patients annually throughout greater Boston. We will randomize 180 participants recruited from 3 BHCHP sites: a shelter clinic, a day center clinic, and a medical center clinic. All participants will be offered 12 weeks of varenicline, 5 sessions of tobacco coaching, and 10 cotinine monitoring visits over a 12-week period. Participants randomized to the financial incentives arm (n=90) will receive escalating debit card payments (range $25-$70) at each monitoring visit for saliva cotinine levels \<30 ng/ml. Control arm participants (n=90) will receive a fixed payment ($10) at each monitoring visit regardless of their saliva cotinine level. We will use an embedded-experiment mixed methods design, where qualitative ('qual') data collection is embedded within a larger quantitative ('QUAN') RCT with the following specific aims:

Aim 1. (QUAN) To determine the effect of the financial incentives intervention on cotinine-verified 7-day smoking abstinence at A) the end of treatment (12 weeks) and B) 12 weeks after treatment (24 weeks).

Hypotheses: Incentive arm participants will have significantly greater cotinine-verified 7-day smoking abstinence than control arm participants at A) 12 weeks and B) 24 weeks.

Aim 2. (qual) To assess why, how, and under what circumstances homeless smokers A) achieve abstinence in response to financial incentives and B) maintain abstinence after incentives are stopped.

Interviews with participants at A) 12 weeks (N=30) and B) 24 weeks (N=20) will examine cognitive ('why?'), procedural ('how?'), and contextual ('under what circumstances?') dimensions of their response to financial incentives to generate hypotheses about potential mechanisms for on-treatment and post-treatment effects and to inform modifications of the intervention for future use.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥18 years old
* Lifetime smoker of ≥100 cigarettes with current daily smoking of ≥5 cigarettes per day, verified by a saliva cotinine level of ≥30 ng/mL
* Ready to try quitting smoking within the next 3 months
* Proficient in English
* Currently or formerly homeless
* Have a primary care provider within BHCHP system

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to provide informed consent
* History of allergic reaction to varenicline
* Currently pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding
* Past-month suicidal ideation with plan or intent, or past 12-month history of suicidal behaviors or attempts
* Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 3 months

Primary outcomes:
measure: Cotinine-verified 7-day smoking abstinence at 12 weeks
timeFrame: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Cotinine-verified 7-day smoking abstinence at 24 weeks
timeFrame: 24 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Boston
country: United States
facility: Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Massachusetts General Hospital
name: Travis Baggett, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: