Clinical trial NCT06840262: Target Muscle Re-innervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Alone and in Combination for the Treatment of Residual and Phantom Limb Pain in Cancer Patients Who Have Received an Amputation
Official title: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) Versus Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNI) Versus the Combined Technique of TMR-RPNI to Reduce Chronic and Phantom Limb Pain in Oncologic Amputees: A Randomized Control Pilot Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Amputation
Lead sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2025-02-21
Enrollment: 45
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This clinical trial evaluates two surgical techniques (targeted muscle re-innervation \[TMR\] and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces \[RPNI\]) alone and in combination for the alleviation of chronic residual limb and phantom limb pain in cancer patients who have had an amputation. Chronic residual limb pain and phantom limb pain are debilitating outcomes of traumatic and oncologic amputation. Emerging microsurgical treatments for post-amputation pain are very promising. TMR and RPNI are both approved surgical techniques that involve connecting cut nerves to parts of the muscle as a way to heal and protect the nerves. This trial evaluates these techniques alone and in combination for the treatment of residual and phantom limb pain in cancer patients who have received an amputation.

Detailed description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

Determine the relative effectiveness of three surgical techniques, TMR, RPNI, and TMR with RPNI, on chronic and phantom limb pain in the oncologic amputee using the validated Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Behavior, Intensity, Interference, and Global Health Forms.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the rate and total quantity of any pain medication use among oncology amputees who received one of the three surgical techniques.

II. To estimate the rate of prosthetic use among oncologic amputees. III. To compare NRS and PROMIS among three surgical techniques to calculate the effect size and project the sample size which will be used to plan a multi-institutional study.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.

ARM 1: Patients undergo TMR procedure.

ARM 2: Patients undergo RPNI procedure.

ARM 3: Patients undergo TMR in combination with RPNI.

After completion of study procedure, patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age who are receiving an amputation for oncologic reasons
* Patients with available mixed major nerves and donor motor nerves in the amputation stump or reconstructive tissue
* Patients able to complete informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients under 18 years of age
* Patients unable to give consent
* Patients receiving an amputation for non-oncologic purposes
* Patients with amputations performed for immediate palliation (life expectancy less than 3 months), as this technique takes a minimum of 3-6 months for effect
* Patients with multiple limb amputations
* Patients receiving nerve management in a delayed fashion (patients who have previously received an amputation and present with neuroma)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Safety and Adverse Events (AEs)
timeFrame: Through study completion; an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Houston
country: United States
facility: M D Anderson Cancer Center
state: Texas
Study officials:
affiliation: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
name: Margaret S Roubaud
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: