Clinical trial NCT06199557: A Study to Investigate Treatment of HU and VPA, or 6-MP and VPA in Unfit AML/HR-MDS Patients
Official title: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter Open-label Study to Investigate Treatment of Hydroxyurea in Combination With Valproic Acid (VPA), or 6- Mercaptopurine in Combination With VPA in Patients With AML or HR-MDS Unfit for Standard Therapy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Phase: PHASE1
PHASE2
Conditions: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Adult
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Adult
Lead sponsor: Haukeland University Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2024-01-10
Enrollment: 48
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SEQUENTIAL
Intervention model description: This a two-part, open-label phase 1/2 study that will include clinical sites in Norway and other Nordic countries. The study consists of part A and part B.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination treatment of hydroxyurea capsules and valproic acid capsules, or the combination treatment of 6-mercaptopurine tablets and valproic acid capsules in male and female patients aged 18 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high- risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

The population to be studied is newly diagnosed AML patients who are considered unfit for standard induction chemotherapy, HR-MDS unfit/ineligible for standard treatment, and relapsed/refractory AML/HR-MDS patients who are considered unfit for standard therapy ,or are, for some reason, ineligible for another type of therapy. Clinically, hydroxyurea, valproic acid and 6-mercaptopurine are historically very well-known therapeutic agents with low toxicity profiles. The rationale for this study is that the combination of these drugs with low toxicity will be well tolerated in elderly AML patients with comorbidities, or lower performance status. This combination could have a beneficial therapeutic effect on overall survival and contribute to a better quality of life.

Detailed description: This a two-part, open-label phase 1/2 study that will include clinical sites in Norway and other Nordic countries.

The study consists of part A and part B. Part A will run in Norway only. Part B will run in Norway and the Nordic countries.

Both part A and part B have two different treatment combinations (T), combination 1 and combination 2. Part B is a cohort expansion of part A (if part A proves to be positive).

Treatment combination 1 (T1): hydroxyurea + valproic acid. Treatment combination 2 (T2): 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid.

Each patient enrolled in the trial will start and will receive at least one cycle with T1:

hydroxyurea and valproic acid. The first cycle in the study always constitutes of hydroxyurea (1000 mg twice a day) plus valproic acid (300 mg + 600 mg) for 14 days; this will be followed by a 14-day period with no medication. Each cycle duration is 28 days.

Patients who do not experience clinical benefit after the first cycle will not be eligible to continue on this regimen and they will be allocated to treatment combination 2. On the other hand, patients who do experience clinical benefit after cycle 1 with combination 1 (HU + VPA) will be further eligible to continue on this regimen/combination. However, patients on T1 will be withdrawn after consequent cycles, as soon as they do not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined by this protocol. Each patient who does not meet the criteria of clinical benefit after the first cycle with treatment combination 1 will switch to treatment combination 2 (T2). T2 constitutes of 6-mercaptopurine (50 mg once a day) plus valproic acid (300 mg + 600 mg) for 14 days; this will be followed by a 14-day period with no medication. Each cycle duration is 28 days. Patients will be further eligible to continue this regimen/combination for as long as they experience clinical benefit, otherwise they will be withdrawn from the study as soon as they do not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined by this protocol.

There will be 8 patients allocated for the treatment combination 1 with HU + VPA and up to 8 patients allocated for the treatment combination 2 with 6MP + VPA. For each of the two treatment combinations, if one or more patients, of 8, experience clinical benefit\* the group will be expanded with 16 more patients in Part B. Part B consists of two cohort expansions where the setup is identical to part A, one for HU + VPA and one for 6MP + VPA, 16 patients in each, in total up to 32 new patients.

In part B, the same principles will apply for response, withdrawal and allocation from HU+ VPA to 6MP + VPA. Patients treated with combination 1, who do not experience clinical benefit or experience unacceptable, unmanageable toxicity after cycle 1, will not be eligible to continue on this regimen, and they will be allocated to combination 2. It is expected that cohort expansion of combination 2 will proceed slower than cohort expansion for combination 1.

If 5 or more patients of the total of 24 (part A (n=8) + part B (n=16)) experience clinical benefit, there will be considered a phase II/III expansion cohort for further effect assessment.

The treatment duration in all groups can last to up 6 cycles in total, each cycle lasts for 28 days. The rationale for the flow in the study aims to ensure that the patients do not undergo prolonged periods with excessive and ineffective treatment. Assessment of treatment response consecutively after each cycle will guide the treating physician to swiftly change the treatment combination or withdraw the patient from the study accordingly.

The switch to a second treatment combination as a part of the study ensures that more therapy options are available for, potentially, all patients who enroll in the trial.

The enrollment is stopped when 8+16 patients with HU +VPA are treated, or if 8+16 patients are treated with 6MP + VPA. Patients will switch over to 6MP +VPA, if lack of clinical benefit. Some dose modifications are allowed when indicated according to the protocol. At screening and during the study treatment, tumor debulking with HU + 6MP is required for 5 to 7 days to reduce WBC to less than 25×10\*9/L (\<20% blasts in the peripheral blood), before each cycle, HU + VPA, or 6MP + VPA. Tumor debulking with HU + 6MP may be repeated ahead of every cycle (for both treatment combinations), and in the treating physician's discretion, if the patient tolerates this.

The objectives of this study include:

* To determine the safety and tolerability of the treatment combinations of hydroxyurea + valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid administered at established clinical doses
* To establish the preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of hydroxyurea and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses
* To establish the preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of 6-mercaptopurine and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses
* To evaluate changes in patients performance status for baseline and during the study period

The adaptive study design is based on a Simon two-stage model of expanding cohorts. This model, tested in the TAPUR, DRUP and Impress-Norway studies, has been designed to effectively test a set of drugs using a minimum of number of patients (see also Chapter 9 on Statistics).

Each arm (A1, A2, B1 and B2) will be monitored using a Simon-like two-stage 'admissible' monitoring plan to identify patients with evidence of clinical benefit. Both arms in part A will enroll 8 participants, and will be considered positive if ≥1 patient show clinical benefit after at least 28 days on treatment (for each arm). In case of a positive part A (arm A1 and A2, separately), part B (arm B1 and B2, separately) will be initiated enrolling 16 additional participants in each arm into the cohort.

If there are 0 patients with "clinical benefit" (as defined by this protocol) among the first 8 participants in an arm, then the respective arm will not proceed to expansion. Otherwise, an additional 16 participants will be included in each cohort expansion (B1 and B2, respectively). Four or fewer responses out of 24 will suggest a lack of activity, while 5 or more responses will suggest that further investigation of the drug in a phase 3 clinical trial is warranted.

* Study duration: 5 years
* Treatment duration: up to 6 months for each treatment combination
* Visit frequency: every 7 days (if applicable, during the first cycle), thereafter every 28 days

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

Participants are eligible for the study only if all of the following criteria apply:

o Female or male, age 18 years or older

* Written informed consent
* Patients with Newly diagnosed AML, as defined by ELN 2022 criteria, or relapsed/refractory AML who: - are unfit, defined as HCT-CI ≥ 3, or - in the opinion of the investigator are not candidates for standard therapy or unlikely to tolerate or derive significant clinical benefit from standard therapy, or

  * the patient has declined standard therapy

Newly diagnosed HR-MDS, or relapsed/refractory HR-MDS who:

* are unfit, defined as HCT-CI ≥ 3, or
* in the opinion of the investigator are not candidates for standard therapy or unlikely to tolerate or derive significant clinical benefit from standard therapy, or
* has declined standard therapy

Secondary AML (MDS-related/ therapy- induced), or

Acute promyelocytic leukemia not eligible for standard therapy and/or specific therapy.

* Adequate renal and hepatic functions unless clearly disease related as indicated by the following laboratory values:

  * Serum creatinine ≤1.5 x ULN;
  * Estimated creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation);
  * Hepatic function;

    i. Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN); ii. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
    1. ≤2.5 × ULN
    2. ≤5 × ULN for patients with liver metastases

       iii. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)

    <!-- -->

    1. ≤2.5 × ULN
    2. ≤5 × ULN for patients with liver metastases

       iv. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)

    1. ≤2.5 × ULN
* European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, 2 or 3
* Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 3 days prior to taking their first dose of study medication. Male patients and female patients of reproductive potential must agree to practice highly effective methods of contraception (such as hormonal implants, combined oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, intrauterine device with hormone spirals, total sexual abstinence, vasectomy) throughout the study and for \>3 months after the last dose of study medication. Female patients are considered NOT of childbearing potential if they have a history of surgical sterility or evidence of post-menopausal status defined as any of the following:

  1. Natural menopause with last menses \>1 year ago
  2. Radiation induced oophorectomy with last menses \>1 year ago
  3. Chemotherapy induced menopause with last menses \>1 year ago

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:

* Patients on treatment for AML (any anti-leukemic therapy including investigational agents) or treated less than 2 weeks before inclusion.
* Concurrent history of active malignancy in the past six months prior to diagnosis except for

  * basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
  * in situ carcinoma of the cervix
* Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, infection, hypertension, pulmonary disease et cetera) at the investigators discretion.
* Breastfeeding women
* Cardiac dysfunction as defined by:

  * myocardial infarction within the last 3 months of study entry, or
  * congestive heart failure NYHA class IV or
  * unstable angina, or
  * unstable cardiac arrhythmias
* SARS-CoV-2 infection \< 7 days or Covid-19-vaccine \< 7 days from study onset
* Patients with a history of non-compliance to medical regimens or who are considered unreliable with respect to compliance.
* Patients with any serious concomitant medical condition that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise participation in the study.
* Patients with senile dementia, mental impairment or any other psychiatric disorder that prohibits the patient from understanding and giving informed consent.
* Current concomitant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy other than as specified in the protocol.
* Known hypersensitivity to study medications or its excipients.
* Any psychological, familial, sociological, and geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Safety and tolerability of the treatment combinations of hydroxyurea + valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine + valproic acid administered at established clinical doses.
timeFrame: Evaluation every 4th week, i.e. after each treatment cycle.
measure: Preliminary efficacy of the treatment combination of hydroxyurea and valproic acid administered at established clinical doses.
timeFrame: Evaluation every 4th week, i.e. after each treatment cycle.
measure: Changes in patients performance status from baseline and during the study period.
timeFrame: Evaluation at baseline, i.e. before onset treatment, after 4 weeks on treatment (i.e.after first cycle), and every 4th week to a total of 24 weeks. (i.e. after each treatment cycle, up to a total of 6 cycles).
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Clinical benefit.
timeFrame: After 3 and 6 cycles (i.e. after 3 and 6 months from the treatment onset).
measure: Duration of clinical benefit.
timeFrame: During the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
measure: Time to progression.
timeFrame: From the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
measure: Changes in reported Quality of Life (QoL) compared to baseline.
timeFrame: At baseline, i.e. before onset treatment, after 4 weeks on treatment (i.e.after first cycle), and after each treatment cycle (every 4th week).
measure: Survival analyses, ORR.
timeFrame: After 3 and 6 cycles (i.e. after 3 and 6 months from the treatment onset).
measure: Survival analyses, OS.
timeFrame: From the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end-treatment.
measure: Hospitalization rate per month per patient.
timeFrame: Before the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
measure: Transfusion rate per month per patient.
timeFrame: Before the treatment onset, during the treatment period of 6 months, and during follow-up, up to 6 months after end treatment.
Other outcomes:
measure: Biomarkers (exploratory).
timeFrame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years, or prolonged if necessary.
measure: Relation of serum concentrations of VPA to treatment response (exploratory).
timeFrame: Exploratory outcome, during the study period, an average of 5 years.
Locations:
city: Bergen
country: Norway
facility: Haukeland University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Helse-Bergen HF
name: Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Dohner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, Ebert BL, Fenaux P, Godley LA, Hasserjian RP, Larson RA, Levine RL, Miyazaki Y, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele G, Rollig C, Sierra J, Stein EM, Tallman MS, Tien HF, Wang J, Wierzbowska A, Lowenberg B. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022 Sep 22;140(12):1345-1377. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016867.
citation: Lowenberg B, Downing JR, Burnett A. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 30;341(14):1051-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909303411407. No abstract available.
citation: Musialek MW, Rybaczek D. Hydroxyurea-The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Genes (Basel). 2021 Jul 19;12(7):1096. doi: 10.3390/genes12071096.
citation: Fredly H, Gjertsen BT, Bruserud O. Histone deacetylase inhibition in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: the effects of valproic acid on leukemic cells, and the clinical and experimental evidence for combining valproic acid with other antileukemic agents. Clin Epigenetics. 2013 Jul 30;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-5-12.
citation: Leitch C, Osdal T, Andresen V, Molland M, Kristiansen S, Nguyen XN, Bruserud O, Gjertsen BT, McCormack E. Hydroxyurea synergizes with valproic acid in wild-type p53 acute myeloid leukaemia. Oncotarget. 2016 Feb 16;7(7):8105-18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6991.
citation: Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A, Schoch R, Gattermann N, Sanz G, List A, Gore SD, Seymour JF, Bennett JM, Byrd J, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach C, Silverman LR; International Vidaza High-Risk MDS Survival Study Group. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Mar;10(3):223-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
citation: Soriano AO, Yang H, Faderl S, Estrov Z, Giles F, Ravandi F, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Ouzounian S, Quezada A, Pierce S, Estey EH, Issa JP, Kantarjian HM, Garcia-Manero G. Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2007 Oct 1;110(7):2302-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078576. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
citation: Chateauvieux S, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:479364. doi: 10.1155/2010/479364. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
citation: Tassara M, Dohner K, Brossart P, Held G, Gotze K, Horst HA, Ringhoffer M, Kohne CH, Kremers S, Raghavachar A, Wulf G, Kirchen H, Nachbaur D, Derigs HG, Wattad M, Koller E, Brugger W, Matzdorff A, Greil R, Heil G, Paschka P, Gaidzik VI, Gottlicher M, Dohner H, Schlenk RF. Valproic acid in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and intensive therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in older patients. Blood. 2014 Jun 26;123(26):4027-36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-546283. Epub 2014 May 5.
citation: Elion GB. Historical background of 6-mercaptopurine. Toxicol Ind Health. 1986 Sep;2(2):1-9. doi: 10.1177/074823378600200201. No abstract available.
citation: BURCHENAL JH, MURPHY ML, ELLISON RR, SYKES MP, TAN TC, LEONE LA, KARNOFSKY DA, CRAVER LF, DARGEON HW, RHOADS CP. Clinical evaluation of a new antimetabolite, 6-mercaptopurine, in the treatment of leukemia and allied diseases. Blood. 1953 Nov;8(11):965-99. No abstract available.
citation: Burnett A, Wetzler M, Lowenberg B. Therapeutic advances in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 10;29(5):487-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1820. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
citation: Estey E. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older patients. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1908-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2731.
citation: Hiddemann W, Kern W, Schoch C, Fonatsch C, Heinecke A, Wormann B, Buchner T. Management of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3569-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3569.
citation: Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, Wierzbowska A, Mazur G, Mayer J, Gau JP, Chou WC, Buckstein R, Cermak J, Kuo CY, Oriol A, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Delaunay J, Lysak D, Minden M, Arthur C. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2670-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9429. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
citation: Wei AH, Panayiotidis P, Montesinos P, Laribi K, Ivanov V, Kim I, Novak J, Stevens DA, Fiedler W, Pagoni M, Bergeron J, Ting SB, Hou JZ, Anagnostopoulos A, McDonald A, Murthy V, Yamauchi T, Wang J, Chyla B, Sun Y, Jiang Q, Mendes W, Hayslip J, DiNardo CD. 6-month follow-up of VIALE-C demonstrates improved and durable efficacy in patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (141/150). Blood Cancer J. 2021 Oct 1;11(10):163. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00555-8.
citation: Pollyea DA, DiNardo CD, Arellano ML, Pigneux A, Fiedler W, Konopleva M, Rizzieri DA, Smith BD, Shinagawa A, Lemoli RM, Dail M, Duan Y, Chyla B, Potluri J, Miller CL, Kantarjian HM. Impact of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Treatment-Naive Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and IDH1/2 Mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jul 1;28(13):2753-2761. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3467.
citation: Steensma DP, Tefferi A. The myelodysplastic syndrome(s): a perspective and review highlighting current controversies. Leuk Res. 2003 Feb;27(2):95-120. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(02)00098-x.
citation: Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Levis A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Krieger O, Luebbert M, Maciejewski J, Magalhaes SM, Miyazaki Y, Pfeilstocker M, Sekeres M, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):2454-65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
citation: Catenacci DV, Schiller GJ. Myelodysplasic syndromes: a comprehensive review. Blood Rev. 2005 Nov;19(6):301-19. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2005.01.004.
citation: Greenberg PL, Stone RM, Al-Kali A, Barta SK, Bejar R, Bennett JM, Carraway H, De Castro CM, Deeg HJ, DeZern AE, Fathi AT, Frankfurt O, Gaensler K, Garcia-Manero G, Griffiths EA, Head D, Horsfall R, Johnson RA, Juckett M, Klimek VM, Komrokji R, Kujawski LA, Maness LJ, O'Donnell MR, Pollyea DA, Shami PJ, Stein BL, Walker AR, Westervelt P, Zeidan A, Shead DA, Smith C. Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jan;15(1):60-87. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0007.
citation: Lubbert M. DNA methylation inhibitors in the treatment of leukemias, myelodysplastic syndromes and hemoglobinopathies: clinical results and possible mechanisms of action. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2000;249:135-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59696-4_9. No abstract available.
citation: Pfeilstocker M, Tuechler H, Sanz G, Schanz J, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Levis A, Luebbert M, Maciejewski J, Machherndl-Spandl S, Magalhaes SM, Miyazaki Y, Sekeres MA, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D, Greenberg PL. Time-dependent changes in mortality and transformation risk in MDS. Blood. 2016 Aug 18;128(7):902-10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-700054. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
citation: Rowley JD, Golomb HM, Dougherty C. 15/17 translocation, a consistent chromosomal change in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Lancet. 1977 Mar 5;1(8010):549-50. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91415-5. No abstract available.
citation: Grignani F, Ferrucci PF, Testa U, Talamo G, Fagioli M, Alcalay M, Mencarelli A, Grignani F, Peschle C, Nicoletti I, et al. The acute promyelocytic leukemia-specific PML-RAR alpha fusion protein inhibits differentiation and promotes survival of myeloid precursor cells. Cell. 1993 Aug 13;74(3):423-31. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80044-f.
citation: Lo-Coco F, Cicconi L. History of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a tale of endless revolution. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2011;3(1):e2011067. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2011.067. Epub 2011 Dec 21. No abstract available.
citation: Breitman TR, Selonick SE, Collins SJ. Induction of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) by retinoic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2936-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2936.
citation: Park JH, Qiao B, Panageas KS, Schymura MJ, Jurcic JG, Rosenblat TL, Altman JK, Douer D, Rowe JM, Tallman MS. Early death rate in acute promyelocytic leukemia remains high despite all-trans retinoic acid. Blood. 2011 Aug 4;118(5):1248-54. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-346437. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
citation: Mantha S, Tallman MS, Devlin SM, Soff GA. Predictive factors of fatal bleeding in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Thromb Res. 2018 Apr;164 Suppl 1:S98-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.038.
citation: Abaza Y, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G, Estey E, Borthakur G, Jabbour E, Faderl S, O'Brien S, Wierda W, Pierce S, Brandt M, McCue D, Luthra R, Patel K, Kornblau S, Kadia T, Daver N, DiNardo C, Jain N, Verstovsek S, Ferrajoli A, Andreeff M, Konopleva M, Estrov Z, Foudray M, McCue D, Cortes J, Ravandi F. Long-term outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab. Blood. 2017 Mar 9;129(10):1275-1283. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-736686. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
citation: Iland HJ, Collins M, Bradstock K, Supple SG, Catalano A, Hertzberg M, Browett P, Grigg A, Firkin F, Campbell LJ, Hugman A, Reynolds J, Di Iulio J, Tiley C, Taylor K, Filshie R, Seldon M, Taper J, Szer J, Moore J, Bashford J, Seymour JF; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. Use of arsenic trioxide in remission induction and consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) APML4 study: a non-randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2015 Sep;2(9):e357-66. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00115-5. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
citation: Tallman MS, Andersen JW, Schiffer CA, Appelbaum FR, Feusner JH, Woods WG, Ogden A, Weinstein H, Shepherd L, Willman C, Bloomfield CD, Rowe JM, Wiernik PH. All-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis from the North American Intergroup protocol. Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4298-302. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0632. Epub 2002 Aug 15.
citation: Dresler WFC, Stein R. Über den hydroxylharnstoff. Justus Liebigs Ann Chem. 1869;150:242- 52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.18691500212.
citation: Lancet JE, Moseley A, Komrokji RS, Coutre SE, DeAngelo DJ, Tallman MS, Litzow M, Othus M, Appelbaum FR. ATRA, Arsenic Trioxide (ATO), and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) Is Safe and Highly Effective in Patients with Previously Untreated High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): Final Results of the SWOG/Alliance/ ECOG S0535 Trial. Blood. 2016; 128:896. https://doi. org/10.1182/blood.V128.22.896.896
citation: Rosenthal F, Wislicki L, Kollek L: Über die Beziehungen von schwersten Blutgiften zu Abbauproducten des Eiweisses: ein Beitrag zum Einstehungsmechanismus der perniziösen änamie. Klin Wochenschr 7:972-977, 1928
citation: STEARNS B, LOSEE KA, BERNSTEIN J. HYDROXYUREA. A NEW TYPE OF POTENTIAL ANTITUMOR AGENT. J Med Chem. 1963 Mar;6:201. doi: 10.1021/jm00338a026. No abstract available.
citation: Gwilt PR, Tracewell WG. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hydroxyurea. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998 May;34(5):347-58. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199834050-00002.
citation: Leavell UW Jr, Yarbro JW. Hydroxyurea. A new treatment for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 1970 Aug;102(2):144-50. doi: 10.1001/archderm.102.2.144. No abstract available.
citation: Cannas G, Poutrel S, Thomas X. Hydroxycarbamine: from an Old Drug Used in Malignant Hemopathies to a Current Standard in Sickle Cell Disease. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;9(1):e2017015. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.015. eCollection 2017.
citation: BS B. On the propyl derivatives and decomposition products of ethylacetoacetate. Am Chem J 1882;3:385-395.
citation: MEUNIER H, CARRAZ G, NEUNIER Y, EYMARD P, AIMARD M. [Pharmacodynamic properties of N-dipropylacetic acid]. Therapie. 1963 Mar-Apr;18:435-8. No abstract available. French.
citation: Gottlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, Kramer OH, Schimpf A, Giavara S, Sleeman JP, Lo Coco F, Nervi C, Pelicci PG, Heinzel T. Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. EMBO J. 2001 Dec 17;20(24):6969-78. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.24.6969.
citation: Chen Y, Tsai YH, Tseng SH. Combined valproic acid and celecoxib treatment induced synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2011 Jun;31(6):2231-9.
citation: Das CM, Aguilera D, Vasquez H, Prasad P, Zhang M, Wolff JE, Gopalakrishnan V. Valproic acid induces p21 and topoisomerase-II (alpha/beta) expression and synergistically enhances etoposide cytotoxicity in human glioblastoma cell lines. J Neurooncol. 2007 Nov;85(2):159-70. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9402-7. Epub 2007 May 30.
citation: McCormack E, Haaland I, Venas G, Forthun RB, Huseby S, Gausdal G, Knappskog S, Micklem DR, Lorens JB, Bruserud O, Gjertsen BT. Synergistic induction of p53 mediated apoptosis by valproic acid and nutlin-3 in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2012 May;26(5):910-7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.315. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
citation: Steinberg MH, McCarthy WF, Castro O, Ballas SK, Armstrong FD, Smith W, Ataga K, Swerdlow P, Kutlar A, DeCastro L, Waclawiw MA; Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia and MSH Patients' Follow-Up. The risks and benefits of long-term use of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia: A 17.5 year follow-up. Am J Hematol. 2010 Jun;85(6):403-8. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21699.
citation: Hankins JS, Aygun B, Nottage K, Thornburg C, Smeltzer MP, Ware RE, Wang WC. From infancy to adolescence: fifteen years of continuous treatment with hydroxyurea in sickle cell anemia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e215. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000215.
citation: Fredly H, Stapnes Bjornsen C, Gjertsen BT, Bruserud O. Combination of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid with oral hydroxyurea or 6-mercaptopurin can be safe and effective in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukaemia--a report of five cases. Hematology. 2010 Oct;15(5):338-43. doi: 10.1179/102453310X12647083620967.
citation: Andresen V, Gjertsen BT. Drug Repurposing for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Nov 29;4:211. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00211. eCollection 2017.
citation: Jadersten M, Lilienthal I, Tsesmetzis N, Lourda M, Bengtzen S, Bohlin A, Arnroth C, Erkers T, Seashore-Ludlow B, Giraud G, Barkhordar GS, Tao S, Fogelstrand L, Saft L, Ostling P, Schinazi RF, Kim B, Schaller T, Juliusson G, Deneberg S, Lehmann S, Rassidakis GZ, Hoglund M, Henter JI, Herold N. Targeting SAMHD1 with hydroxyurea in first-line cytarabine-based therapy of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia: Results from the HEAT-AML trial. J Intern Med. 2022 Dec;292(6):925-940. doi: 10.1111/joim.13553. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
citation: Mamez AC, Raffoux E, Chevret S, Lemiale V, Boissel N, Canet E, Schlemmer B, Dombret H, Azoulay E, Lengline E. Pre-treatment with oral hydroxyurea prior to intensive chemotherapy improves early survival of patients with high hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Oct;57(10):2281-8. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2016.1142083. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
citation: Grund FM, Armitage JO, Burns P. Hydroxyurea in the prevention of the effects of leukostasis in acute leukemia. Arch Intern Med. 1977 Sep;137(9):1246-7.
citation: Berg J, Vincent PC, Gunz FW. Extreme leucocytosis and prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia. Med J Aust. 1979 Jun 2;1(11):480-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1979.tb119318.x.
citation: Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Dombret H, Ebert BL, Fenaux P, Larson RA, Levine RL, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz M, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Tien HF, Wei AH, Lowenberg B, Bloomfield CD. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
citation: Fredly H, Ersvaer E, Kittang AO, Tsykunova G, Gjertsen BT, Bruserud O. The combination of valproic acid, all-trans retinoic acid and low-dose cytarabine as disease-stabilizing treatment in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Epigenetics. 2013 Aug 1;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-5-13.
citation: Kuendgen A, Strupp C, Aivado M, Bernhardt A, Hildebrandt B, Haas R, Germing U, Gattermann N. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with valproic acid alone or in combination with all-trans retinoic acid. Blood. 2004 Sep 1;104(5):1266-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4333. Epub 2004 May 20.
citation: Raffoux E, Chaibi P, Dombret H, Degos L. Valproic acid and all-trans retinoic acid for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2005 Jul;90(7):986-8.
citation: STOCK CC, CLARKE DA, PHILIPS FS, BARCLAY RK, MYRON SA. Sarcoma 180 screening data. Cancer Res. 1960 Jun;20(5)Pt 2:193-381. No abstract available.