Clinical trial NCT00769392: Pilot Study: A Randomized Trial Of Anesthetic Agents For Intravitreal Injection
Official title: Pilot Study: A Randomized Trial Of Anesthetic Agents For Intravitreal Injection
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Macular Degeneration
Keywords: Macular Degeneration
Intravitreal injections
Eye anesthesia-Topical/subconjunctival
Eye-surgical procedures
Ophthalmologic anesthesia methods
Lead sponsor: Lahey Clinic
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2008-10-09
Enrollment: 28
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 40
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Intervention model: SEQUENTIAL
Intervention model description: Participants will be randomized to receive a unique sequence of one of the 4 anesthetic agents per month, prior to a standard of care monthly intravitreal injection (1 injection per month for a total of 4 months). At the end of study participation, each patient will have received each of the 4 anesthetic agents once prior to one of the 4 intravitreal injections (ex. Randomization to sequence: Proparcacaine used prior to Injection 1; Tetracaine used prior to Injection 2; Lidocaine sponge used prior to Injection 3; Lidocaine suconjunctival injection used prior to Injection 4).
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study is designed to compare four currently used types of anesthesia used prior to intravitreal injection in order to evaluate the most effective method of anesthesia in reducing pain and discomfort associated with intravitreal injections.

Detailed description: Over the last several years intravitreal injection of pharmacologic agents has become a common procedure in ophthalmology. Injected agents include steroid, antibiotics, and most recently anti-VEGF agents. There are many methods of preparing a patient for intravitreal injection. While there are guidelines for infection prophylaxis, there is currently no standard of care or consensus on which method of anesthesia is most effective in reducing pain and discomfort associated with intravitreal injections.

Patients who have received prior injections and are scheduled to continue regular injections will be randomized to utilize one of four types of anesthetic treatment for each of 4 treatment periods,so that each subject receives all four types of anesthesia over the course of the study. The order of the anesthetic treatment the subject will receive prior to each planned intravitreal injection during the study period will be different for each subject. This will decrease the effect of extraneous variables from influencing subjective pain scores.

Following each procedure, patients will fill out an analog pain scale questionnaire, grading the discomfort of receiving both the anesthesia and the injection(on separate 0-10 scales).

The anesthetic methods used will include: 1.) Drops of Proparacaine on the eye, 2.) Drops of Tetracaine on the eye, 3.) A cotton sponge (pledget) soaked with Lidocaine 4% placed over the conjunctiva and 4.)A subconjunctival injection with 2% Lidocaine.

The subjects' number and type of visits, tests and treatments will be standard of care and will not be different due to the study. The total time for the treatment part of the study coincides with four injections (1 injection per month) or approximately 4 months and will be followed for up to 6 months.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Male or female \> 40 years of age
* Diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration
* History of at least 1 intravitreal injection in the past in either eye
* Written informed consent has been obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

* Known allergy or sensitivity to the study medications(s), it's components, or other agents required for the study procedures(e.g. Povidone iodine)

Primary outcomes:
measure: Discomfort Associated With the Intravitreal Injection
timeFrame: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Discomfort From Anesthesia Used Prior to Intravitreal Injections
timeFrame: 16 weeks
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Arlington
country: United States
facility: Lahey Clinic Arlington
state: Massachusetts
city: Burlington
country: United States
facility: Lahey Clinic, Inc.
state: Massachusetts
city: Peabody
country: United States
facility: Lahey Clinic Northshore
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Lahey Clinic, Inc.
name: Gregory R. Blaha, M.D., Ph.D.
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Kaderli B, Avci R. Comparison of topical and subconjunctival anesthesia in intravitreal injection administrations. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):718-21. doi: 10.1177/112067210601600509.
citation: Landry DA. Topical anesthetic pledgett system (TAPS) for intravitreal injection preparation. Insight. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):20.