Clinical trial NCT02752230: Comparison of Exparel to Marcaine in Post-Surgical Analgesia in Bariatrics
Official title: Comparison of Exparel (Bupivacaine Liposome) to Marcaine (Bupivacaine) in Post-Surgical Analgesia for Laparoscopic Trocar Site Incisions in Bariatric Surgery
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: WITHDRAWN
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: Post Operative Pain
Keywords: Post operative pain
Bariatric Surgery
Lead sponsor: Kettering Health Network
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-04-26
Enrollment: 0
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: This study is designed to evaluate the use of bupivacaine liposome 1.3% compared bupivacaine 0.5% in pain control in post-operative laparoscopic bariatric surgery patient The purpose of this study is to evaluate two local anesthetics and determine if there is an advantage of administering one medication compared over the other. The intent is show that one local anesthetic.allows for improved pain control as per the pain scale ratings of the test subjects.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

-Any patient scheduled to undergo Laparoscopic Roux en Y Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Gastric Sleeve with Dr. Stephen Fleischer

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with an allergy to either medications being studied any patient with neurological disorders that may be exacerbated by the use of either medication,including multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or that may impact the perception of pain.
* Patients with complex medical conditions that may confound data analysis per the principal investigator's discretion.
* Any pregnant patient.Any patients that would not like to participate in the study.
* Any patient that is not able to read or understand English

Primary outcomes:
measure: Subjective Post Operative Pain Level
timeFrame: Within the first 10 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Kettering Health Network
name: Lauren Smith
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
citation: McGee, DL. Local and topical anesthesia in clinical procedures in Emergency Medicine, 5th edition, Roberts, JR, 263Hedges, JR(Eds), Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2010, pg. 481
citation: Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, Palmer RH, Cahalane M, Hamel MB, Mukamal K, Phillips RS, Davies DT Jr, Banks NJ. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000 Aug;38(8):796-806. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00004.
citation: Fleischmann KE, Goldman L, Young B, Lee TH. Association between cardiac and noncardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: outcomes and effects on length of stay. Am J Med. 2003 Nov;115(7):515-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00474-1.
citation: Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA Jr. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.276.