Clinical trial NCT03902457: Histomorphometric and Tomographic Assessment on the Influence of the Placement of a Collagen Membrane Subjacent the Sinus Mucosa After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Official title: Histomorphometric and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessments on the Influence a Collagen Membrane Placed Subjacent the Sinus Mucosa After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Alveolar Bone Loss
Keywords: maxillary sinus
collagen membrane
CBCT
Histology
Lead sponsor: ARDEC Academy
Sponsor class: NETWORK
Collaborators: name: Corporacion Universitaria Rafael Nunez
First posted: 2019-04-04
Enrollment: 20
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 21
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Clinical trial
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: the purpose of the study is to look for differences in dimensional variations of augmented maxillary sinuses with or without the placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa.

Detailed description: Material and Methods: After the elevation of the maxillary sinus mucosa, a collagen membrane with standard dimensions will be placed at the test sites subjacent the sinus mucosa and the elevated space will be filled with a xenograft, both test and control groups. A collagen membrane will be placed to cover the antrostomy at both groups and sutures will be provided to close the wound. After six months of healing, mini-implants will be installed. After 9 months, biopsies containing the mini-implants will be harvested for histomorphometric analyses. CBCTs will be taken for all patients before surgery (T0), after 1 week from sinus floor augmentation (T1) and after 9 months of healing (T2). Osseointegration of the mini-implants and dimensional changes over time of soft and hard tissues will be evaluated on the CBCTs.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* presence of an edentulous atrophic zone in the posterior segment of the maxilla
* height of the sinus floor ≤4 mm
* desiring a prosthetic restoration of the zone using a fix prosthesis supported by implants;
* ≥ 21 years of age
* good general health
* no contraindication for oral surgical procedures
* not being pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

* present a systemic disordered
* had a chemotherapic or radiotherapeutic treatment
* are smokers \>10 cigarettes per day
* have an acute or a chronic sinusitis
* had a previous bone augmentation procedures in the zone of interest.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Changing in height of the elevated zone
timeFrame: The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
measure: New bone-to-implant contact
timeFrame: Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Changing in mucosa thickness
timeFrame: The CBCTs will be taken before surgery (T0) and 1-week (T1) and 9 months (T2) after surgery.
measure: New bone density around the mini-implant, from B to A and up to a distance of 400 µm from the implant surface.
timeFrame: Mini-implants will be installed six months after sinus lifting and retrieved after three months of healing
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cartagena de Indias
country: Colombia
facility: Colombia
state: Cartagena
Study officials:
References:
citation: Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):511-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511.
citation: Nolan PJ, Freeman K, Kraut RA. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
citation: Kawakami S, Lang NP, Iida T, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Nov;9(4):e12362. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12362. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
citation: Kawakami S, Lang NP, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Influence of the height of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed by cone beam computed tomography- a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):223-232. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7112. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
citation: Iida T, Carneiro Martins Neto E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP. Influence of a collagen membrane positioned subjacent the sinus mucosa following the elevation of the maxillary sinus. A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1567-1576. doi: 10.1111/clr.13027. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
citation: Omori Y, Ricardo Silva E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP. Reposition of the bone plate over the antrostomy in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Aug;29(8):821-834. doi: 10.1111/clr.13292. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
citation: Aimetti M, Romagnoli R, Ricci G, Massei G. Maxillary sinus elevation: the effect of macrolacerations and microlacerations of the sinus membrane as determined by endoscopy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001 Dec;21(6):581-9.
citation: Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-64.
citation: Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):165-73.
citation: Choi BH, Zhu SJ, Jung JH, Lee SH, Huh JY. The use of autologous fibrin glue for closing sinus membrane perforations during sinus lifts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Feb;101(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
citation: Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent. 1999;8(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199901000-00003.
citation: Proussaefs P, Lozada J. The "Loma Linda pouch": a technique for repairing the perforated sinus membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Dec;23(6):593-7.
citation: Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J. Effects of sealing the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a pilot study in humans. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(5):235-41. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)0292.3.CO;2.
citation: Testori T, Wallace SS, Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Trisi P, Capelli M, Weinstein RL. Repair of large sinus membrane perforations using stabilized collagen barrier membranes: surgical techniques with histologic and radiographic evidence of success. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Feb;28(1):9-17.
citation: Kim YK, Yun PY, Oh JS, Kim SG. Prognosis of closure of large sinus membrane perforations using pedicled buccal fat pads and a resorbable collagen membrane: case series study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Aug;40(4):188-94. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.4.188. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
citation: Scala A, Lang NP, Velez JU, Favero R, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Effects of a collagen membrane positioned between augmentation material and the sinus mucosa in the elevation of the maxillary sinus floor. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1454-1461. doi: 10.1111/clr.12762. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
citation: Favero V, Lang NP, Canullo L, Urbizo Velez J, Bengazi F, Botticelli D. Sinus floor elevation outcomes following perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):233-40. doi: 10.1111/clr.12576. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
citation: Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkate CM. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):691-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01697.x.