Clinical trial NCT04184843: Development and Evaluation of iWalk: A Guide to Facilitate Evidence-informed Assessment of Walking After Stroke
Official title: Development and Evaluation of iWalk: A Guide to Facilitate Evidence-informed Assessment of Walking After Stroke
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Stroke
Lead sponsor: University of Toronto
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Dalhousie University
name: University Health Network, Toronto
name: Nova Scotia Health Authority
name: McMaster University
name: CorHealth Ontario
name: Drexel University
name: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
name: Sinai Health System
name: Unity Health Toronto
First posted: 2019-12-04
Enrollment: 54
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: NA
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: DIAGNOSTIC

Brief summary: Stroke remains a major health concern and the second highest cause of disability worldwide. After experiencing a stroke, many people lose the ability to walk independently. As a result, people with stroke require intensive rehabilitation services, spend the majority of their time in physical therapy on retraining walking, and cite recovery of walking as a primary rehabilitation goal. Assessment of walking using reliable and valid tools is a recommended practice in stroke rehabilitation guidelines in Canada, the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands. The 10-metre walk test (10mWT) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are highly recommended in guidelines and by professional organizations for the clinical evaluation of walking across the care continuum. For the 10mWT, the time to traverse the middle 10 metres of a 14-metre walkway at a comfortable pace is used to compute comfortable walking speed. For the 6MWT, the maximum distance achieved walking back and forth along a 30-metre walkway in six minutes is documented.

To facilitate physical therapists' (PTs') use of an evidence-informed approach to administering these walking tests post-stroke in an acute care, inpatient rehabilitation, or outpatient rehabilitation setting, the iWalk Toolkit, a theory-based toolkit, was developed. This Toolkit consists of an educational guide, a smartphone app, and an educational video.

In this mixed methods study, PTs across multiple sites were evaluated before and after a 5-month intervention involving the implementation of the iWalk Toolkit. Objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the nature and extent to which PTs across the care continuum uptake/use information in a theory-based toolkit designed to guide use of the 10-metre and 6-minute walk tests post-stroke for initial assessment, goal setting, education, treatment selection and monitoring change; and (2) to describe PTs' perceptions of the features of the guide, the provider and the setting that facilitated or prevented walk test administration and use of test scores for initial assessment, prognosis, goal setting, treatment selection and monitoring change.


Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Physical therapists working in hospitals providing acute care, in-patient rehabilitation, or outpatient rehabilitation services for people with stroke
* Physical therapists registered with the provincial regulatory body
* Physical therapists who provided walking rehabilitation to 10 or more patients with stroke per year
* Individuals in a professional leader (PL) or professional practice leader (PPL) role defined as an individual who was responsible for facilitating and advancing evidence-based physical therapy practice and ensuring that professional practice standards were met.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in the percentage of ambulatory patients post-stroke for which physical therapists have documented administration of walk tests in the health record at least once during the patient's hospital stay or physical therapy treatment
timeFrame: Change from baseline to 5 months
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change in the percentage of physical therapists in the action or maintenance stage determined using the 26-item self-report Clinician Readiness for Measuring Outcomes Scale.
timeFrame: Change from baseline to 5 months
measure: Change in the mean self-efficacy rating on an 11-point ordinal scale ranging from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident) for physical therapists performing 12 unique walk test practices.
timeFrame: Change from baseline to 5 months
measure: Median score from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent) for each domain (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality) on the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
timeFrame: At 5 months
measure: Percentage of therapists who attended each learning session, reviewed each iWalk guide module and the video, practiced each walk test with colleagues, completed learning activities outlined in the guide, and used the app in clinical or various practices.
timeFrame: At 5 months
measure: Physical therapists' perceptions of the features of the guide, the provider and the setting that facilitated or prevented walk test administration and use of test scores
timeFrame: Up to 8 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Toronto
name: Nancy Salbach, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: