Clinical trial NCT05699226: Amplitude Titration to Improve ECT Clinical Outcomes
Official title: Amplitude Titration to Improve ECT Clinical Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Depression
ECT
Cognitive Change
Lead sponsor: University of New Mexico
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
First posted: 2023-01-26
Enrollment: 50
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 50
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Randomized clinical trial with two arms: experimental (variable amplitude) and control (fixed amplitude). Participant and outcomes assessor will be masked to assignment.
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: A randomized controlled trial will compare hippocampal neuroplasticity, antidepressant, and cognitive outcomes between individualized amplitude and fixed 800 mA amplitude ECT in older depressed subjects (n = 25 per group, n = 50 total). Relative to fixed 800 mA ECT:

H1: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved RUL antidepressant outcome (IDS-C30 response rates and reduced BT electrode placement switch at V2).

H2: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved cognitive outcomes (DKEFS-Verbal Fluency

Detailed description: ECT dosing can be divided into three categories for the ECT responder: insufficient (no antidepressant response, no cognitive impairment), optimal (antidepressant response, no cognitive impairment), or excessive (antidepressant response, cognitive impairment). Traditional fixed amplitude ECT dosing with 800 mA adjusts pulse train duration and frequency based on seizure titration or demographic factors (age, sex). Fixed amplitude produces variable electric fields and ECT dosing secondary to individual neuroanatomic differences. Adjustments to pulse width, pulse train duration, and frequency do not improve the efficacy of insufficient dosing or mitigate the cognitive risk of excessive dosing. In contrast, individualized amplitude based on electric field modeling or amplitude seizure titration produces consistent electric fields and ECT dosing. Based on our results from the R61 investigation, individualized amplitude with right unilateral electrode placement has the potential to reliably achieve optimal dosing and will be tested with the R33 phase of the investigation.

Subjects will receive baseline imaging, clinical (primary outcome: clinician rated Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, IDS-C30), and neuropsychological assessment (primary outcome: Delis Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency, DKEFS) 24 to 48 hours prior to the first ECT session (V1). Subjects will receive their second assessment (V2) one day after the sixth ECT treatment and the final assessment (V3) one day after the ECT series. If the subject fails to demonstrate improvement at V2 (\< 25% reduction from baseline IDS-C30 total score, the primary antidepressant outcome), the subject will then receive bitemporal (BT) electrode placement for the remainder of the ECT series. The transition to BT will be a secondary antidepressant outcome. Subjects will be randomized to receive right unilateral (RUL) electrode placement with an individualized amplitude (n = 25) or traditional fixed 800 mA amplitude (n = 25, 1:1 ratio). Subjects and Raters will be blinded to subject assignment. Subjects in both arms will receive fixed pulse width (1.0 milliseconds), frequency (20 hertz), and pulse train duration (8 seconds).

For the individualized amplitude arm, subjects will receive RUL amplitude determined seizure titration during the first treatment like the R61 phase of the investigation (IDE for Soterix adapter: G200123). Subsequent RUL treatments will be completed with an individualized amplitude. To determine the individualized amplitude, we will use Ebrain. The individualized amplitude can be determined from the optimal E-field (V/m) / baseline E-field (V/m per mA). If a discrepancy exists between the amplitude seizure and E-field modeling methods that results in amplitude difference \> 100 mA, we will use the E-field modeling method to determine the individualized amplitude. We will round the amplitude to the nearest 100 mA from 500 to 900 mA (the current dosing range of the FDA approved ECT device).

For the fixed 800 mA amplitude arm, subjects will receive RUL amplitude determined seizure titration during the first treatment. The rationale for amplitude titration with the fixed amplitude arm is to 1) improve the goodness of fit of the amplitude-seizure and Ebrain relationship; and 2) control for a sub-therapeutic stimulation associated with the first treatment for both arms. RUL amplitude seizure titration will be conducted during the first treatment like the individualized amplitude arm. Subsequent RUL treatments will be completed with 800 mA amplitude. The only difference between the arms will be individualized versus fixed 800 mA amplitude after amplitude titration.

A randomized controlled trial will compare hippocampal neuroplasticity, antidepressant, and cognitive outcomes between individualized amplitude and fixed 800 mA amplitude ECT in older depressed subjects (n = 25 per group, n = 50 total). Relative to fixed 800 mA ECT:

H1: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved RUL antidepressant outcome (IDS-C30 response rates and reduced BT electrode placement switch at V2).

H2: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved cognitive outcomes (DKEFS-Verbal Fluency

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Diagnosis of major depressive disorder or bipolar II
* Clinical indications for ECT with right unilateral electrode placement

Exclusion Criteria:

* Defined neurological or neurodegenerative disorder (e.g., traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease)
* Other psychiatric conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder)
* Current drug or alcohol use disorder (except for nicotine)
* Contraindications to MRI.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated
timeFrame: 4 weeks
measure: Delis Kaplan Executive Function System Letter Fluency
timeFrame: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Albuquerque
country: United States
facility: University of New Mexico Health Science Center
state: New Mexico
Study officials:
affiliation: University of New Mexico
name: Chris Abbott, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: