Clinical trial NCT06856148: Testing Strategies to Improve Substance Misuse Prevention Research Use in State Policy Contexts
Official title: Building the Science of Evidence-Informed Prevention Policy: a Multi-level Model for Supporting Substance Misuse Prevention
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: RECRUITING
Phase: NA
Conditions: Substance Abuse
Substance Use Disorders
Prevention
Legislation
Use of Research Evidence
Keywords: Randomized Control Trial
Substance Abuse Prevention
Substance Misuse Prevention
Prevention Policy
Evidence-Based Policy
Policymaking
Research Communications
Research Translation
Public Policy
Public Health
Lead sponsor: Penn State University
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
First posted: 2025-03-04
Enrollment: 300
Sex: ALL
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Sampled states' legislatures will be randomly assigned to either a comprehensive intervention or a control group that receives minimal intervention.
Primary purpose: OTHER

Brief summary: If science is to inform effective substance misuse prevention policy and ultimately improve public health, the field needs an effective strategy for directly supporting policymakers' use of research evidence, yet our field lacks an evidence-based model designed for this purpose. Accordingly, a state-level randomized controlled trial (N = 30 states) of a formal, theory-based approach for appropriately supporting policymakers' use of scientific evidence--known as the Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) Model is proposed. This work has the potential to reduce population-level substance misuse by improving the use of scientific information in policymaking, thus increasing the availability of evidence-based prevention programs and policies.

Detailed description: If science is to inform policy and ultimately improve public health, the field needs an effective strategy for directly supporting policymakers' use of research evidence. However, the field lacks an evidence-based model designed for supporting state policymakers' use of prevention research in crafting legislation. Instead, the field continues to largely rely on ad hoc strategies for translating prevention research (e.g., opportunistic outreach and responding to policymakers' requests if or when they are made). Accordingly, an experimental study of a formal, theory-based approach for supporting policymakers' use of scientific evidence that does not involve lobbying-the Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) Model is proposed. The RPC fosters productive engagement between the policy and research communities by implementing systematic capacity building and outreach strategies. Previous experimental work on the RPC demonstrated the ability of this model to increase engagement between researchers and policymakers, increase policymakers' value for research evidence, and improve their use of scientific evidence in their policymaking.1 The study proposes a state-level randomized controlled trial of the RPC (N = 30 state legislatures) that will evaluate the model's ability to improve engagement between state policymakers' and the prevention science community, build policymakers' awareness and value of substance misuse prevention research, and subsequently their use of research evidence throughout the policymaking process. To accomplish this, the study will test three specific research aims. Aim 1 will assess historical and current use of research evidence in state legislation pertaining to substance misuse prevention. This will involve qualitative coding of bills introduced by state legislatures over the last five years. Aim 2 will compare the frequency and quality of engagement with prevention researchers between the intervention and control conditions. Additionally, the study will assess how the RPC model influences policymakers' value and awareness of substance misuse prevention over time using a validated survey across three time points. Aim 3 will evaluate the effectiveness of the RPC on legislators' actual use of research in legislation by observing and quantifying changes in legislator behavior related to research use. Improving the use of scientific information in policymaking can reduce population-level substance misuse by increasing the availability of evidence-based prevention programs and policies.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* State-level public officials

Exclusion Criteria:

* Anyone who is not a state-level public official

Primary outcomes:
measure: RPC impact on introduction of evidence-informed bills
timeFrame: Baseline, post intervention, and 6-months post intervention
Secondary outcomes:
measure: RPC impact on legislators' perceived use of prevention research
timeFrame: Baseline, post intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
measure: RPC impact on legislators' engagement with prevention researchers
timeFrame: Baseline, post collaboration, and 6 months post-intervention
measure: RPC impact on state legislators' value of substance misuse prevention science
timeFrame: Baseline, post intervention, and 6 months post intervention
measure: RPC effectiveness on legislators' awareness of substance misuse prevention science
timeFrame: Baseline, post intervention, and 6 months post-intervention
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: University Park
country: United States
facility: Penn State University
state: Pennsylvania
Study officials:
References: