Clinical trial NCT05710094: Safety and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Doses of SoftOx Biofilm Eradicator (SBE) in Chronic Leg Wounds
Official title: Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Ascending Single Doses of SoftOx Biofilm Eradicator (SBE) and Open-label Once-, Twice-, and Thrice-daily Dosing of SBE for Five Days in Patients With Chronic Leg Wounds.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE1
Conditions: Chronic Leg Ulcer
Venous Leg Ulcer
Keywords: lower extremities infection biofilm antimicrobial
Lead sponsor: SoftOx Solutions AS
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2023-02-02
Enrollment: 28
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled ascending single dose groups (Groups 1 to 4); followed by open-label multiple ascending dose groups (Groups 5 to 7)
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Single-centre clinical study investigating the safety and tolerability of randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled ascending single doses of topically applied SoftOx Biofilm Eradicator (SBE) in patients with chronic leg wounds and of open-label once daily, twice daily, and thrice daily dosing of topically applied SBE for five days in patients with chronic leg wounds. The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of topically applied SBE in patients with chronic leg wounds. A secondary objective of the study is to assess changes in bacterial burden in the leg wound after treatment with SBE.

Detailed description: The study enrolled subjects with chronic leg wounds, i.e., the intended target population for SBE.

The first part of the study aimed to identify the highest tolerated dose of SBE in a randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled manner with sequential evaluation of 4 single ascending doses. As a precaution, sentinel and staggered dosing was applied in the single-dose groups: the safety of two subjects treated on two different days (at least one of whom was treated with SBE) was reviewed before commencing dosing of the remaining subjects in a single-dose group (sentinel dosing), with an interval of at least 1 hour between the dosing of different subjects (staggered dosing). The starting dose of 500 µg/mL HOCl + 1% HAc was based on previous knowledge concerning the MIC and MBC of SBE and the results obtained in a 28-day, repeated-dose toxicology study in minipigs. The latter indicated that up to 1000 µg/mL + 3% HAc (the highest dose tested) was well-tolerated. Choosing 500 µg/mL HOCl + 1% HAc as the starting dose in the current study provided a safety factor of 2 for HOCl and a safety factor of 3 for HAc. The highest well-tolerated dose of SBE in the non-clinical toxicology study was chosen as the highest single dose to be evaluated in the current study. Dose-escalation steps in the single-dose groups were conservatively defined with escalation factors ranging from 1 to 2. Prior to dose escalation, blinded results were evaluated by the Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC).

The second part of the study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple dosing of SBE. The multiple-dose groups tested different dosing regimens with formulations determined by the SMC based on the safety and tolerability of the formulations evaluated in the first part of the study. Three multiple-dose groups (once-, twice-, and thrice-daily administrations) were planned.

Eligibility criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA

To be eligible for this study, patients must fulfil all of the following criteria:

1. Male and female patients aged 18 and above at time of informed consent.
2. Chronic (present for at least 4 weeks) leg wound, as judged by the Investigator, with a size of at least 1 cm2 and maximally 100 cm2 (measured as the width x length) on the day of the (first) administration of IMP.
3. Patients must have given written informed consent before any study-related activities are carried out and must be able to understand the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and adverse effects.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients are not eligible for this study if they fulfil any of the following exclusion criteria:

1. Any surgical or medical condition, including findings in the medical history or in the pre-study assessments, or any other significant disease, that in the opinion of the Investigator, constitutes a risk or a contraindication for the participation of the patient in the study or that could interfere with the study objectives, conduct, or evaluation at screening or time of the (first) administration of IMP.
2. Known or clinical suspicion of cancer in the leg wound at screening or time of the (first) administration of IMP, e.g., basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.
3. Clinical symptoms of COVID-19 or positive test for SARS-CoV-2 (testing according to local procedures) at screening or on the day of the (first) administration of IMP.
4. Clinical infection requiring systemic antibiotics at time of the (first) administration of IMP.
5. Severe ischaemia in the target leg at screening or time of the (first) administration of IMP defined as an ankle brachial index (ABI) \< 0.5.
6. Necrotic tissue in leg wound at time of the (first) administration of IMP.
7. Clinically significantly reduced perception of sensation or pain assessed in proximity of the wound at screening.
8. A pain score from the leg wound above 4 assessed on a 10 cm VAS , where 0 cm indicates no pain at all and 10 cm indicates the worst imaginable pain at time of the (first) administration of IMP.
9. Use of opioids from time of screening to end of study, unless used a at stable dose, as judged by the Investigator.
10. Participation in the treatment phase of a clinical study with an investigational new drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before the (first) administration of IMP.
11. Has previously received SBE in any of the concentrations tested in the current study.
12. Pregnant or lactating at screening or time of the (first) administration of IMP.
13. Ascertained or presumptive allergy/ hypersensitivity to any components of the IMP; history of anaphylaxis to drugs or serious allergic reactions leading to hospitalisation or any other allergy reaction in general, which the Investigator considers may affect the safety of the patient and/or outcome of the study.
14. Inability to communicate or cooperate with the Investigator (e.g., language problems, illiteracy, poor mental status) or to comply with the requirements of the study.
15. Other factors which in the opinion of the Investigator may interfere with study conduct.
16. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Nature, occurrence, and severity of adverse events (AEs)
timeFrame: From the start of the first administration of IMP to 3 to 5 days after the last administration of IMP
measure: Change from baseline in wound pain assessed by use of visual analogue scale (VAS).
timeFrame: From the start of the first administration of IMP to 3 to 5 days after the last administration of IMP
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline in wound bacterial burden (number of colony-forming units per mL; CFU/mL)
timeFrame: From the start of the first administration of IMP to 3 to 5 days after the last administration of IMP
Other outcomes:
measure: Change from baseline in wound area
timeFrame: From the start of the first administration of IMP to 3 to 5 days after the last administration of IMP
Locations:
city: Copenhagen
country: Denmark
facility: Bispebjerg University Hospital
Study officials:
affiliation: Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
name: David Peick Sonne, MD; PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: SoftOx Solutions A/S
name: Glenn Gundersen, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
References: