Clinical trial NCT02013674: The TRansendocardial Stem Cell Injection Delivery Effects on Neomyogenesis STudy (The TRIDENT Study)
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Blinded, Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Injection of Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSCs) (20 Million or 100 Million Total MSCs) in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Myocardial Infarction.
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE2
Conditions: Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Myocardial Infarction
Keywords: Cardiovascular
Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Lead sponsor: University of Miami
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: The Emmes Company, LLC
First posted: 2013-12-17
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 21
Maximum age (years): 90
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Thirty (30) patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to MI scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization will be enrolled in the study. This is a phase II study intended to gain additional safety and efficacy assessments among two dose levels previously studied in a phase I setting.

Detailed description: Thirty (30) patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to MI scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization will be enrolled in the study.This is a phase II study intended to gain additional safety and efficacy assessments among two dose levels previously studied in a phase I setting. In this study, a 20 million total hMSC dose and a 100 million total hMSC dose will be randomly allocated administered via the Biocardia Helical infusion system in a blinded manner.

The technique of transplanting progenitor cells into a region of damaged myocardium, termed cellular cardiomyoplasty, is a potentially new therapeutic modality designed to replace or repair necrotic, scarred, or dysfunctional myocardium. Ideally, graft cells should be readily available, easy to culture to ensure adequate quantities for transplantation, and able to survive in host myocardium, which is often a hostile environment of limited blood supply and immunorejection. Whether effective cellular regenerative strategies require that administered cells differentiate into adult cardiomyocytes and couple electromechanically with the surrounding myocardium is increasingly controversial and recent evidence suggests that this may not be required for effective cardiac repair. Most importantly, transplantation of graft cells should improve cardiac function and prevent adverse ventricular remodeling. To date, a number of candidate cells have been transplanted in experimental models, including fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes, embryonic stem cell-derived myocytes, tissue engineered contractile grafts9, skeletal myoblasts, several cell types derived from adult bone marrow, and cardiac precursors residing within the heart itself. There has been substantial clinical development in the use of whole bone marrow and skeletal myoblast preparations in studies enrolling both post-infarction patients and patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. The effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have also been studied clinically.

Currently, bone marrow or bone marrow-derived cells represent a highly promising modality for cardiac repair. The totality of evidence from trials investigating autologous whole bone marrow infusions into patients following myocardial infarction supports the safety of this approach. In terms of efficacy, increases in ejection fraction are reported in the majority of the trials.

Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction is a common and problematic condition; definitive therapy in the form of heart transplantation is available to only a tiny minority of eligible patients. Cellular cardiomyoplasty for chronic heart failure has been studied less than for acute MI, but represents a potentially important alternative for this disease.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* In order to participate in this study, a patient MUST:

  1. Be ≥ 21 and \< 90 years of age.
  2. Provide written informed consent.
  3. Have a diagnosis of chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction (MI) as defined by previous myocardial infarction documented by an imaging study demonstrating coronary artery disease with corresponding areas of akinesis, dyskinesis, or severe hypokinesis.
  4. Been treated with appropriate maximal medical therapy for heart failure or post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction. For beta-blockade, the patient must have been on a stable dose of a clinically appropriate beta-blocker for 3 months. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, the patient must have been on a stable dose of a clinically appropriate agent for 1 month.
  5. Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization within 5 to 10 weeks of screening as determined by doctors.
  6. Have an ejection fraction of less than or equal to 50% by gated blood pool scan, two-dimensional echocardiogram, CT, or left ventriculogram within the prior six months and not in the setting of a recent ischemic event.

Exclusion Criteria:

* In order to participate in this study, a patient MUST NOT:

  1. Have a baseline glomerular filtration rate ≤ 35 ml/min/1.73m2.
  2. Have a known, serious radiographic contrast allergy.
  3. Have a Mechanical aortic valve or heart constrictive device.
  4. Have a documented presence of aortic stenosis (aortic stenosis graded as 1.5cm2 or less).
  5. Have a documented presence of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment of aortic insufficiency graded as ≥+2).
  6. Require coronary artery revascularization. Patients who require or undergo revascularization procedures should undergo these procedures a minimum of 3 months in advance of treatment in this study. In addition, patients who develop a need for revascularization following enrollment will be submitted for this therapy without delay.
  7. Have evidence of a life-threatening arrhythmia in the absence of a defibrillator (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats or complete second or third degree heart block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker) or Corrected for heart rate (QTc) interval \> 550 ms on screening ECG
  8. Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) firing in the past 60 days prior to enrollment.
  9. Have a hematologic abnormality as evidenced by hematocrit \< 25%, white blood cell \< 2,500/µl or platelet values \< 100,000/µl without another explanation.
  10. Have liver dysfunction, as evidenced by enzymes (AST and ALT) greater than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
  11. Have a coagulopathy = (INR \> 1.3) not due to a reversible cause (i.e., Coumadin). Patients on Coumadin will be withdrawn 5 days before the procedure and confirmed to have an INR \< 1.3. Patients who cannot be withdrawn from Coumadin will be excluded from enrollment
  12. Have known allergies to penicillin or streptomycin.
  13. Hypersensitivity to Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO).
  14. Be an organ transplant recipient.
  15. Have a history of organ or cell transplant rejection
  16. Have a clinical history of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., patients with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), except curatively-treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma in situ or cervical carcinoma.
  17. Have a non-cardiac condition that limits lifespan to \< 1 year.
  18. Have a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 24 months.
  19. Be on chronic therapy with immunosuppressant medication, such as corticosteroids or TNFα antagonists.
  20. Be serum positive for HIV, hepatitis BsAg or viremic hepatitis C.
  21. Be currently participating (or participated within the previous 30 days) in an investigational therapeutic or device trial.
  22. Be a female who is pregnant, nursing, or of childbearing potential while not practicing effective contraceptive methods. Female patients must undergo a blood or urine pregnancy test at screening and within 36 hours prior to injection.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE).
timeFrame: One month post-catheterization
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Infarct Scar Size (ISS)
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 months
measure: Number of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusion
timeFrame: 6 months, 12 months
measure: Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)
timeFrame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
measure: Six-minute Walk Test.
timeFrame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
measure: Changed in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.
timeFrame: Baseline to 3 months, Baseline to 6 months, Baseline to 12 months
measure: Number of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).
timeFrame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post injection.
measure: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)
timeFrame: 6 months, 12 months
measure: Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores
timeFrame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
measure: Echocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular Function
timeFrame: 6 months, 12 months
measure: Difference Between Regional Left Ventricular Function (at the Site of Allogeneic Cell Injections)
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 Months
measure: Difference Between the Regional Left Ventricular Wall Thickening
timeFrame: Baseline, Month 12
measure: Difference Between Left Ventricular End Diastolic Wall Thickness
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 Months
measure: Difference Between the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 months
measure: Difference in LVEF
timeFrame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
measure: Difference in Left Ventricular Volume
timeFrame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
measure: Difference in Left Ventricular Volume
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 months
measure: Difference in Left Ventricular Regional Myocardial Perfusion
timeFrame: Baseline, 12 months
measure: Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Number of Clinically Significant of Abnormal Lab Values.
timeFrame: 12 months
measure: Serial Troponin I
timeFrame: 12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterization
measure: Number of Participants With Abnormal ECHO Reading
timeFrame: 6 hours post cardiac catheterization
measure: Creatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)
timeFrame: 12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterization
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Miami
country: United States
facility: ISCI / University of Miami
state: Florida
Study officials:
affiliation: ISCI / University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
name: Joshua M Hare, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Florea V, Rieger AC, DiFede DL, El-Khorazaty J, Natsumeda M, Banerjee MN, Tompkins BA, Khan A, Schulman IH, Landin AM, Mushtaq M, Golpanian S, Lowery MH, Byrnes JJ, Hendel RC, Cohen MG, Valasaki K, Pujol MV, Ghersin E, Miki R, Delgado C, Abuzeid F, Vidro-Casiano M, Saltzman RG, DaFonseca D, Caceres LV, Ramdas KN, Mendizabal A, Heldman AW, Mitrani RD, Hare JM. Dose Comparison Study of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (The TRIDENT Study). Circ Res. 2017 Nov 10;121(11):1279-1290. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311827. Epub 2017 Sep 18.