Clinical trial NCT02975726: Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites
Official title: Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites Management: A Randomized Un-Blinded Pilot Study
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Liver Cirrhosis
Ascites
Keywords: Liver Cirrhosis
Refractory ascites
PD catheter
Lead sponsor: University of Manitoba
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2016-11-29
Enrollment: 2
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: One complication of liver disease is the buildup of fluid within the belly. This is known as ascites. Patients who have ascites have a decreased appetite, pain, nausea and shortness of breath. Ascites is typically treated with medications, however when that does not work, patients need a procedure where a needle is inserted in the belly every few weeks to drain the excess fluid. About 2 in 5 patients with ascites from liver failure can get kidney disease from their worsening liver function or from the drainage of fluid with needles. Once patients have both advanced liver disease and kidney disease, their chance of dying largely increases.

The present study will be the first of its kind to study a new technique to treat ascites. Investigators are planning to place a tube in a patient's belly to drain the excessive amounts of fluid. This technique is similar to how one type of dialysis is done to treat patients with kidney failure. This study is set as a pilot investigation in order to determine the feasibility of doing a larger, randomized clinical trial investigating the use of this novel technique. Importantly, advanced liver disease patients are at high risk to develop kidney disease, and therefore are an important group to focus on. Investigators believe that this technique will prevent or slow the development of kidney disease in liver failure patients, and improve their quality of life, far more than the current available treatments.

Detailed description: Refractory ascites is when fluid recurrently accumulates in the peritoneal cavity, as an end result of multiple mechanisms, including liver cirrhosis, peritoneal infiltration by tumor, portal hypertension, lymphangitic carcinomatosis, congestive heart failure, or lymphatic obstruction. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, including complications of abdominal wall hernias, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, kidney dysfunction, and pleural effusions. The development of ascites also leads to multiple symptoms including anorexia, early satiety, nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath, and limited mobility.

The management of ascites associated with liver dysfunction usually follows a stepwise escalation in treatments. The initial management typically involves sodium restriction and diuretic therapy up to a daily maximum of 160 mg of furosemide and 400 mg of spironolactone. When ascites no longer can be controlled by these measures, one option is to decrease portal hypertension, a main pathogenic factor in ascites development, by undergoing a procedure called transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This procedure requires certain patient criteria to be fulfilled and is associated with complications and increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy, and therefore is confined to a small subgroup of patients with ascites. Consequently, abdominal large volume paracentesis (LVP) is the treatment of choice in many patients. This procedure involves insertion of a needle into the peritoneal cavity where ascites accumulates, then attaching the needle to a collection system that drains the ascites by gravity. The definitive treatment for ascites in patients with cirrhosis is a liver transplant, but due to limited supply of organs, and contraindications to transplantation, patients often undergo repeated LVP while waiting on the wait list or until death. Paracentesis is associated with risks including post paracentesis circulatory dysfunction leading to hyponatremia, kidney dysfunction, viscus puncture, and peritonitis. It also is a costly, resource intense, and at times an uncomfortable treatment for patients due to the procedure itself and the need for repeated treatments.

A potential alternative to LVP is the placement of an intraperitoneal catheter, in the same manner that a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter, to drain ascites. The procedure has a high technical insertion success rate with minimal complications and is routinely done at the bedside by nephrologist under local anesthesia. PD catheter placement for ascites drainage has many potential advantages, including the ability for it to be done at home by the patient and avoid visits to clinics or hospitals; the frequency of drainage can be timed to patient symptoms, and perhaps have less complication rates than LVP. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach in decompensated cirrhosis when compared to periodic LVP (current standard of care) has not been tested in a randomized trial. Investigators propose a single center, multi-site randomized control trial comparing bedside PD catheter placement versus usual standard of serial LVP for treatment of refractory ascites. The primary outcomes will be improvement of 10 points in the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at two months. Investigators plan to randomize 50 patients (25 per arm) based on a power calculation to achieve an 10 point improvement in the PCS-SF-36 (SE = 5). Secondary outcomes will include incidence of mechanical and infectious complications, emergency department utilization, hospitalization and mortality, all other domains of the SF-36, Euroquol-5D (EQ-5D), the Newcastle Patient Reported Ascites Measure and overall health care costs.

Primary Hypothesis: Drainage of ascites associated with liver failure via PD catheter is superior to serial LVP in improving the physical component of quality of life as measured by SF-36.

This trial will be pivotal in possibly changing the standard of care for the management of refractory ascites from cirrhosis. If the primary hypothesis is confirmed, investigators will design and conduct subsequent trials to address potential morbidity and mortality benefits associated with this technique for ascites management.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Males and non-pregnant females greater than 18 years of age.
2. Liver cirrhosis as defined by a histological, clinical, or radiological criteria
3. Patients with refractory non-malignant ascites requiring 2 or more LVPs in the last 4 months.
4. No contraindication for bedside PD catheter insertion (e.g. prior major abdominal surgery, ostomies, large hernias, bleeding diatheses, inability to lie flat).
5. Patients having a support person (family member/friend/caregiver, etc) willing to go through training and help with catheter care.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior liver transplant
2. Is actively being worked up for liver transplant or is already on the liver transplant waitlist
3. Current SBP (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) defined as polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count of \>250 cells/mm3 in the ascites or positive bacteria in ascitic cultures
4. Malignant ascites
5. Severe coagulopathy with either an INR (international normalized ratio) \> 1.5, a platelet count \< 50 x 109/L that is not able to be reversed at time of PD catheter insertion
6. Any previous episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
7. Loculated ascites
8. Known presence of HIV/AIDS
9. Immunomodulatory treatments used within the last 4 months
10. Expected survival \<6 months and/or MELD (The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score \> 30
11. Hepatic Encephalopathy episode requiring hospital admission in the past 6 months.
12. History of non-compliance or suspected failure to comply with study requirements
13. Allergies to Vancomycin and Cephalosporins.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in the physical component of Quality of Life
timeFrame: 2 months post intervention
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Catheter Insertion Technical Success Rate
timeFrame: Day of insertion of PD catheter
measure: PD Catheter Survival
timeFrame: Number of days between catheter insertion and possible complication, up to 6 months
measure: PD Catheter Related Complications Frequency
timeFrame: through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Large Volume Paracentesis Complications Frequency
timeFrame: through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Participant Self-Reported Health Status
timeFrame: 0,2,4 and 6 months
measure: Participant Health State Description and Evaluation
timeFrame: 0,2,4 and 6 months
measure: The Impact of Ascites on Health Related Quality of Life
timeFrame: 0,2,4 and 6 months
measure: Renal Dysfunction Assessment
timeFrame: Monthly, up to 6 months
measure: Renal Function Assessment
timeFrame: at 0 and 6 months
measure: Serum Albumin and PD Fluid Albumin Assesment
timeFrame: At 0, 2, and 6 months
measure: Patient Heart Rate
timeFrame: At regular clinic appointments, through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Patient Blood Pressure
timeFrame: At regular clinic appointments, through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Patient Weight
timeFrame: At regular clinic appointments, through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Hospital Visits
timeFrame: through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Total Health Care Costs
timeFrame: through study completion, up to 6 months
measure: Cost Effectiveness
timeFrame: through study completion, up to 6 months
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Winnipeg
country: Canada
facility: Health Sciences Centre
state: Manitoba
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Manitoba
name: Paul Komenda, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Senousy BE, Draganov PV. Evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan 7;15(1):67-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.67.
citation: Planas R, Montoliu S, Balleste B, Rivera M, Miquel M, Masnou H, Galeras JA, Gimenez MD, Santos J, Cirera I, Morillas RM, Coll S, Sola R. Natural history of patients hospitalized for management of cirrhotic ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Nov;4(11):1385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.08.007.
citation: Singhal S, Baikati KK, Jabbour II, Anand S. Management of refractory ascites. Am J Ther. 2012 Mar;19(2):121-32. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181ff7a8b.
citation: Runyon BA; AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009 Jun;49(6):2087-107. doi: 10.1002/hep.22853. No abstract available.
citation: Van Thiel DH, Moore CM, Garcia M, George M, Nadir A. Continuous peritoneal drainage of large-volume ascites. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2723-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1792-x. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
citation: Peltekian KM, Wong F, Liu PP, Logan AG, Sherman M, Blendis LM. Cardiovascular, renal, and neurohumoral responses to single large-volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-resistant ascites. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):394-9.
citation: Lungren MP, Kim CY, Stewart JK, Smith TP, Miller MJ. Tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter placement for refractory ascites: single-center experience in 188 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
citation: Savin MA, Kirsch MJ, Romano WJ, Wang SK, Arpasi PJ, Mazon CD. Peritoneal ports for treatment of intractable ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000147082.05392.2B.
citation: Tapping CR, Ling L, Razack A. PleurX drain use in the management of malignant ascites: safety, complications, long-term patency and factors predictive of success. Br J Radiol. 2012 May;85(1013):623-8. doi: 10.1259/bjr/24538524. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
citation: Barnett TD, Rubins J. Placement of a permanent tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter for palliation of malignant ascites: a simplified percutaneous approach. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Apr;13(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61740-0.
citation: Belfort MA, Stevens PJ, DeHaek K, Soeters R, Krige JE. A new approach to the management of malignant ascites; a permanently implanted abdominal drain. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1990 Feb;16(1):47-53.
citation: Monsky WL, Yoneda KY, MacMillan J, Deutsch LS, Dong P, Hourigan H, Schwartz Y, Magee S, Duffield C, Boak T, Cernilia J. Peritoneal and pleural ports for management of refractory ascites and pleural effusions: assessment of impact on patient quality of life and hospice/home nursing care. J Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;12(9):811-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0061.
citation: Fleming ND, Alvarez-Secord A, Von Gruenigen V, Miller MJ, Abernethy AP. Indwelling catheters for the management of refractory malignant ascites: a systematic literature overview and retrospective chart review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Sep;38(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.09.008. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
citation: Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV, Oliver MJ, Na Y, Perl J. The impact of transfer from hemodialysis on peritoneal dialysis technique survival. Perit Dial Int. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):297-305. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00147. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
citation: Wong F. Management of ascites in cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jan;27(1):11-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06925.x.