Clinical trial NCT01721330: A Double-Blind Comparison of Naltrexone and Placebo in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Official title: A Double-Blind Comparison of Naltrexone and Placebo in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: TERMINATED
Phase: PHASE4
Conditions: ADHD
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords: ADHD
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Psychopharmacology
Psychiatry
Non-stimulant treatment
Lead sponsor: Massachusetts General Hospital
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2012-11-04
Enrollment: 3
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 55
Standard ages: ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The primary aim of this study is to assess whether naltrexone as a monotherapy is effective in treating ADHD in adults. Medications that increase dopamine are often effective treatments for ADHD. Since naltrexone is a kappa opioid receptor antagonist, it increases dopamine in the brain. The investigators predict that naltrexone as a monotherapy will be effective for ADHD symptoms in adults with ADHD.

The investigators also plan to assess the effects of naltrexone on dopamine as measured by changes in serum prolactin. The investigators predict that naltrexone will increase dopamine as indexed by decreases in serum prolactin. This study will be a six-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study with adults 18-55 years of age with ADHD.

Detailed description: This will be a six-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study of adult ADHD with naltrexone monotherapy. Eligible and consenting subjects will be recruited into the study. The first visit will consist of a meeting with a study clinician who obtains consent, assesses for eligibility, and completes study rating scales. After this evaluation, subjects will complete a neuropsychological assessment and study rating scales (two hours; this visit can take place over multiple days, if necessary). Subjects will then be randomized to naltrexone (50 mg) once a day with breakfast or placebo at a ratio of 1:1 to be increased, if tolerated, to 100 mg by week 1.

Blood will be drawn for prolactin, basic metabolic panel, CBC, and LFT's at pre-baseline and upon completion of the study. Ten cc's (approximately two teaspoons) of blood will be required for the basic metabolic panel, CBC, and LFT's at each drawing. An additional five cc's (approximately one teaspoon) of blood will be required for laboratory testing of prolactin levels at each drawing. Dipstick urine drug testing will be done at pre-baseline.

Women of child bearing age will also have a urine pregnancy test at pre-baseline.

Although every effort will be made to encourage subjects to keep regularly scheduled appointments, in the event that a subject is unable to come into the office within a reasonable timeframe of a scheduled visit, and the treating research clinician feels that subject safety will not be jeopardized by doing so, the clinician can conduct the visit with the subject over the telephone. However, study evaluation visit (pre-baseline), baseline visit, mid-point visit (week 3), or the final study visit may not be conducted over the phone. Additionally, phone visits may not occur for two consecutive visits.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and female outpatients 18-55 years of age.
2. Diagnosis of ADHD, by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV (DSM-IV) by clinical evaluation by an expert clinician.
3. A CGI of 7 (among the most extremely ill patients) at the pre-baseline visit is exclusionary, and any subject who presents a CGI-S of 7 at any point during the study will be removed from participation.
4. Subjects presenting with a CGI-S score of 6 (severely ill) at two consecutive visits after week 2 will be dropped from the study (i.e. A subject with a CGI of 6 at his/her week 3 visit and at week 4 visit will be dropped from the study at the week 4 visit). Subjects who are dropped for severe or worsening symptoms after exposure to the study medication will receive free follow up care as described in the detailed protocol and protocol summary.
5. Subjects treated for anxiety disorders and depression who are on a stable medication regimen for at least one month, and who have a disorder-specific CGI-Severity score ≤ 3 (mildly ill) and who have a score on the Hamilton-Depression and Hamilton-Anxiety rating scales below 15 (mild range).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any clinically unstable psychiatric conditions including any history of psychosis or mania, suicidality, sociopathy, criminality, or delinquency.
2. Current (last 3 months) substance use disorders (alcohol or drugs),
3. Medical condition or treatment that will either jeopardize subject safety or affect the scientific merit of the study including cardiovascular disease, current untreated hypertension, or history of renal or hepatic impairment.
4. A condition that will or may require treatment with opioid analgesics.
5. Clinically significant abnormal baseline laboratory LFT's, which is defined as LFT's greater than the ULN.
6. Mental retardation (IQ \< 80).
7. Organic brain disorders including delirium, dementia, seizures, stroke, neurosurgery, and head trauma with loss of consciousness.
8. Pregnant or nursing females.
9. Subjects with current adequate treatment for ADHD.
10. Any other concomitant medication with primarily central nervous system activity other than specified in Concomitant Medication portion of the protocol (a stable and effective treatment regimen of an SSRI or benzodiazepine is permitted per clinical review).
11. Non-English speaking subjects will not be allowed into the study for the following reasons:

    1. The assessment instruments are unavailable and have not been adequately standardized in other languages;
    2. Even if such translation services were available, the assessments in the English language conducted by English-speaking clinicians and raters with English-speaking subjects are already extremely time-consuming, lasting many hours, making it unfeasible, unrealistic, and of dubious clinical validity to conduct them with a translator with non-English-speaking subjects;
    3. Psychiatric questionnaires and evaluations are taxing, and adding the complexity of a translator has the potential to make the patient experience even more exhausting.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in Adult Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Score
timeFrame: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Cambridge
country: United States
facility: Massachusetts General Hospital
state: Massachusetts
Study officials:
affiliation: Massachusetts General Hospital
name: Thomas J Spencer, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: