Clinical trial NCT00269438: New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium in Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
Official title: Phase 3 Study to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of a New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium Dosed Twice Daily in Achieving Clinical Improvement in Subjects With Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis After 8 Weeks of Therapy
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis
Lead sponsor: Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Sponsor class: INDUSTRY
First posted: 2005-12-23
Enrollment: 225
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Maximum age (years): 80
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a new tablet formulation and dosing regimen of balsalazide disodium dosed twice daily in achieving clinical improvement in subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of therapy.

Detailed description: The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.

The secondary endpoints are as follows:

1. The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
2. The change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
3. The proportion of subjects with treatment failure, defined as withdrawal due to significant disease progression or lack of significant improvement, as determined by the Investigator.
4. The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Weeks 2 and 8, where mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
5. The proportion of subjects achieving complete remission at Week 2 and Week 8, where complete remission is defined as a MMDAI score of less than or equal to 1.
6. The proportion of subjects with improvement from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
7. Change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and subjective sense of well being, as recorded in the subjects' diaries.
8. The proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, where clinical remission is defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and a combined score of less than or equal to 2 for bowel frequency and physician assessment using the MMDAI.
9. Time to clinical remission, where clinical remission is defined as in secondary endpoint number eight.

Safety endpoints are as follows:

* incidence of treatment-emergent AEs grouped by body system and evaluated by treatment group;
* changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters at each treatment visit by treatment group; and
* changes from baseline in vital sign measurements at each treatment visit by treatment group.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:

1. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
2. Subject is a male or, if the subject is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:

   Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization \[hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation\] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses);

   OR,

   Childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screen and, if heterosexually active, agrees to one of the following:
   * Double barrier method of contraception, specifically, use of a condom and spermicide, for 1 week prior to study drug administration, throughout the 8 week Treatment Phase.
   * Oral contraceptives administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration during all 6 months of study drug administration and administered for 1 monthly cycle following completion of the study.
   * An intrauterine device (IUD), inserted by a qualified clinician, with published data showing that the lowest expected failure rate is less than or equal to 1% per year (not all IUDs meet this criterion).
   * Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DEPO-PROVERA) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration, during all 6 months of study drug administration, and administered for 1 monthly cycle following study completion. Norelgestromin/ ethinyl estradiol transdermal system (Ortho Evra patch) administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration and administered for 2 monthly cycles following study completion
   * Partner has undergone vasectomy and subject is in a monogamous relationship. The investigator is responsible for determining whether the subject is using appropriate birth control for study participation.
   * Subject is greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
   * Subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis experiencing symptoms of an acute flare within the past 4 weeks.
3. Subject has not taken more than 2.4 grams of mesalamine or equivalent for a continuous period of 4 weeks preceding the screening visit
4. Subjects must have a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive. Additionally, subjects must score greater than or equal to 2 on Bleeding and greater than or equal to 2 on Endoscopy/Sigmoidoscopy.
5. Subject is capable and willing to comply with all study procedures.
6. Disease extends at least 20 cm from the rectum on screening sigmoidoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply (Note: Development of any of the following exclusion criteria on-study will be considered a basis for subject discontinuation.):

1. Subject has a significant medical, including psychiatric, condition which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation in the study.
2. Subject has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine, or other salicylates.
3. Subject has recently (within the past 30 days) failed therapy with balsalazide disodium
4. Subject has received immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. azothioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) within 30 days, or corticosteroids (oral, intravenous \[IV\] or topical rectal) within 30 days prior to screening.
5. Subject has received intra-rectal aminosalicylates within 14 days of screening.
6. Subject has had any prior bowel surgery, excepting appendectomy.
7. Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to study screening, with the exception of Salix protocols 3003 \& 3004 entitled: "A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate the use of mesalamine pellet formulation 1.5G QD to maintain remission from mildly to moderate ulcerative colitis."
8. Subject is pregnant or at risk of pregnancy, or is lactating (female subjects only).
9. Subject shows evidence of current excessive alcohol consumption or drug dependence.
10. Subject has a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis (B and C).
11. Subject has other infectious, ischemic, or immunologic diseases with GI involvement.
12. Subject has twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) for any of the following LFTs: alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin (except isolated elevation of unconjugated bilirubin).
13. Subject has uncontrolled, clinically significant renal disease manifested by 1.5 × ULN of serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels.
14. Subject has calculated creatinine clearance level of less than or equal to 60 mL/min.
15. Subject has unstable cardiovascular, coagulopathy or pulmonary disease.
16. Subject has active malignancy within the last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or if female, in situ cervical carcinoma that has been surgically excised.
17. Subject has any condition or circumstance that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent completion of the study or interfere with analysis of study results, including history of noncompliance with treatments or visits.
18. Subject has sclerosing cholangitis.
19. Subject has positive stool culture for ovum and parasites (O and P) or C. difficile.
20. Subject has been treated with infliximab, cyclosporine, natalizumab, or methotrexate for ulcerative colitis within the last 30 days prior to screening.
21. Regular use of NSAIDS except cardioprotective ASA (i.e., less than or equal to 162 mg ASA per day).
22. Subject has received cell-depleting therapies such as the Adacolumn.
23. Subject requires antidiarrheal therapy during screening.
24. Subject has clinical or radiographic findings suggestive of serious UC complications such as toxic megacolon or colonic perforation.

Females of Reproductive Potential:

If a female subject becomes pregnant while on this study, the study drug will be discontinued immediately and the subject followed until the outcome of the pregnancy is known. If a pregnancy occurs, it will be reported in the same manner as an unexpected AE using the guidelines provided in Section 6.4.1.9.

Premature Subject Discontinuation:

A subject may be discontinued from the study for the following medical or administrative reasons:

* Occurrence of an AE, which in the judgment of the investigator suggests an unacceptable risk to the subject (The investigator will follow the subject until satisfactory resolution of the AE or the AE is determined to be stable);
* Development on-study of any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the study sponsor, places the subject at an unacceptable medical risk if he/she continues;
* Pregnancy;
* Subject request;
* Institution of additional medical (rescue) therapy for UC. The investigator may discontinue individual subjects from the study at any time. Subjects will be encouraged to complete the study; however they may voluntarily withdraw at any time. The investigator must provide written documentation of the reason for discontinuation on the CRF. Regardless of the reason for withdrawal, all subjects will be asked to undergo an end of therapy evaluation. Every attempt will be made to obtain all the end of study assessments, including all of the subscales of the MMDAI (i.e., bowel frequency, bleeding, physician's assessment, and endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score).

Subjects who withdraw or are withdrawn will not be replaced under this protocol.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a >3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Birmingham
country: United States
facility: Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates
state: Alabama
city: Mobile
country: United States
facility: Spring Memorial Hospital
state: Alabama
city: Little Rock
country: United States
facility: Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic
state: Arkansas
city: Anaheim
country: United States
facility: Advanced Clinical Research Institute
state: California
city: Beverly Hills
country: United States
facility: Lovelace Scientific Resources
state: California
city: Garden Grove
country: United States
facility: Digestive Liver Disease Specialists, Medical Group
state: California
city: Laguna Hills
country: United States
facility: Therapeutic Research Institute of Orange County
state: California
city: Long Beach
country: United States
facility: Long Beach VA Medical Center
state: California
city: Mission Hills
country: United States
facility: Facey Medical Group
state: California
city: Orange
country: United States
facility: Community Clinical Trials
state: California
city: San Francisco
country: United States
facility: Rider Research Group
state: California
city: San Rafael
country: United States
facility: John Jolley, M.D.
state: California
city: Santa Ana
country: United States
facility: Lovelace Scientific Resources
state: California
city: Santa Barbara
country: United States
facility: Santa Barbara Clinical Research
state: California
city: Bristol
country: United States
facility: Connecticut Gastroenterology Institute
state: Connecticut
city: Stamford
country: United States
facility: Stamford Therapeutic Consortium
state: Connecticut
city: Hialeah
country: United States
facility: Medical Research Unlimited
state: Florida
city: Hollywood
country: United States
facility: Mark Lamet, M.D.
state: Florida
city: Hollywood
country: United States
facility: Southern Clinical Research Consultants
state: Florida
city: New Smyrna Beach
country: United States
facility: United Medical Research
state: Florida
city: North Miami Beach
country: United States
facility: Venture Research Institute, LLC
state: Florida
city: Palm Harbor
country: United States
facility: Advanced Gastroenterology Associates
state: Florida
city: Sarasota
country: United States
facility: Lovelace Scientific Resources
state: Florida
city: Sarasota
country: United States
facility: Advent Clinical Research
state: Florida
city: Spring Hill
country: United States
facility: Clinical Research of Tampa Bay, Inc.
state: Florida
city: West Palm Beach
country: United States
facility: Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
state: Florida
city: Atlanta
country: United States
facility: Gary Richter, M.D.
state: Georgia
city: Decatur
country: United States
facility: The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology
state: Georgia
city: Macon
country: United States
facility: Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia
state: Georgia
city: Arlington Heights
country: United States
facility: Northwest Gastroenterologists S.C.
state: Illinois
city: Oak Forest
country: United States
facility: University Digestive Health Center
state: Illinois
city: Waterloo
country: United States
facility: Covenent Clinic
state: Iowa
city: Topeka
country: United States
facility: Digestive Health Center
state: Kansas
city: Louisville
country: United States
facility: University of Louisville
state: Kentucky
city: Baton Rouge
country: United States
facility: Digestive Health Center of Louisiana
state: Louisiana
city: Baltimore
country: United States
facility: Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates, PA
state: Maryland
city: Baltimore
country: United States
facility: Sinai Medical Office Building
state: Maryland
city: Hollywood
country: United States
facility: Mid Atlantic Medical Research Centers
state: Maryland
city: Chesterfield
country: United States
facility: Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
state: Michigan
city: Kansas City
country: United States
state: Missouri
city: Mexico
country: United States
facility: Center for Digestive & Liver Diseases
state: Missouri
city: Saint Louis
country: United States
facility: St. Louis Center for Clinical Research
state: Missouri
city: Elizabeth
country: United States
facility: Central Jersey Primary Care Inc.
state: New Jersey
city: Ocean City
country: United States
state: New Jersey
city: New York
country: United States
state: New York
city: Syracuse
country: United States
facility: VA Medical Center
state: New York
city: Troy
country: United States
facility: Upstate Gastroenterology Associates, PC
state: New York
city: Greensboro
country: United States
facility: LeBauer Research Associates, PA
state: North Carolina
city: High Point
country: United States
facility: Bethany Medical Center
state: North Carolina
city: Rocky Mount
country: United States
facility: Boice-Willis Clinic
state: North Carolina
city: Cincinnati
country: United States
facility: Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc.
state: Ohio
city: Warren
country: United States
facility: Avamar Center for Gastroenterology, Inc.
state: Ohio
city: Charleston
country: United States
facility: Charleston Gastroenterology Specialists, LLC
state: South Carolina
city: Simpsonville
country: United States
facility: Hillcrest Clinical Research LLC
state: South Carolina
city: Kingsport
country: United States
facility: Gastroenterology Associates
state: Tennessee
city: Knoxville
country: United States
facility: Gastrointestinal Associates
state: Tennessee
city: Memphis
country: United States
facility: Memphis Gastroenterology Group
state: Tennessee
city: Nashville
country: United States
facility: Nashville Medical Research Institute
state: Tennessee
city: Houston
country: United States
facility: Clinical Trial Network
state: Texas
city: Houston
country: United States
facility: NationsMed Clinical Research
state: Texas
city: Houston
country: United States
facility: Houston Digestive Disease Clinic
state: Texas
city: Chesapeake
country: United States
facility: Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater
state: Virginia
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: Seattle Gastroenterology Associates
state: Washington
city: Spokane
country: United States
facility: Eastern Washington Clinical Research Center
state: Washington
city: Spokane
country: United States
facility: Spokane Digestive Disease Center Research
state: Washington
city: Tacoma
country: United States
facility: Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center
state: Washington
Study officials:
References: