Clinical trial NCT03033901: Comparison of Sleep Apnea Assessment Strategies to Maximize TBI Rehabilitation Participation and Outcome
Official title: Comparison of Sleep Apnea Assessment Strategies to Maximize TBI Rehabilitation Participation and Outcome
Study type: OBSERVATIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Conditions: Apnea, Sleep
Brain Injury, Traumatic
Keywords: Veterans
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Diagnosis
Lead sponsor: James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital
Sponsor class: FED
Collaborators: name: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
name: Craig Hospital
name: Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
name: University of Washington
name: Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation
name: Ohio State University
name: University of South Florida
name: Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research
name: North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
First posted: 2017-01-27
Enrollment: 345
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 16
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Observational model: COHORT
Time perspective: PROSPECTIVE
Sampling method: NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE
Study population: The study population will be TBI patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation at an existing NIDILRR or VA funded TBI Model System Center who meet study inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Brief summary: Background: Sleep disorders, including sleep apnea, are common after traumatic brain injury and affect recovery and negatively influence participation in rehabilitation. Sleep apnea is a breathing problem while persons sleep and causes further brain damage and problems with thinking, daily functioning, and overall health. Earlier diagnosis and treatment is important for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors to maximize the recovery process. There is little information that guides TBI doctors on how to identify sleep apnea during inpatient TBI rehabilitation, a phase in which people experience the potential for a rapid pace of improvement. The Agency for Healthcare Research has highlighted gaps in best methods for identifying sleep apnea and separately in helping consumers with TBI rehabilitation choices. Partnering with survivors, caregivers, and administrators, investigators developed this study to compare sleep apnea screening and diagnostic tools in TBI rehabilitation settings. This information will provide clinicians, providers, and patients with the best information for early identification of sleep apnea to remove negative influence on the pace of recovery in early phases after TBI.

The Goal: Investigators will compare existing screening (Aim 1) and diagnostic tools (Aim 2) in TBI patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. For the second aim, investigators will determine if a more accessible diagnostic test is sufficient to diagnose sleep apnea compared to the traditional method used which is less accessible to consumers. If the more accessible test is good enough, this will increase recognition of this problem and increase patient access to earlier sleep apnea treatment.

Stakeholders and Products. TBI survivors, caregivers, researchers, and policymakers working together on this study helped develop the study questions. Idea exchanges included ways to reach clinicians and TBI survivors/caregivers via existing educational programming and online tools for consumers such as fact sheets and patient/caregiver-focused videos. Other traditional methods will include targeting professional magazines, conferences, and research journals that reach professionals working with TBI survivors and their families at the time of admission to rehabilitation and during the recovery process. This study will occur at rehabilitation hospitals around the country who enroll TBI survivors into a lifetime study called the TBI Model System funded by the Department of Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs (VA).

Detailed description: Background and Significance:

Meta-analyses of TBI studies found prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was 12 times higher than community-based studies. Yet, sleep apnea in those with TBI is largely undiagnosed. Given that sleep is critical for neural repair and disordered sleep may play a role in slowing functional recovery and prolonging rehabilitation, early detection of sleep apnea is critical (Stakeholder Input). Minimal guidance exists informing TBI and sleep medicine physicians regarding assessment of sleep disorders in the acute rehabilitation setting. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Comparative Effectiveness Review highlighted insufficient comparative effectiveness evidence for diagnostic and screening tools. This study proposes to leverage the existing TBI Model System research consortium (TBIMS), funded by the Departments of Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs, to improve early detection of sleep apnea in patients with TBI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation at six study sites. Study aims are focused around components of phased testing for sleep apnea. Findings will inform clinician's decisions for screening and diagnostic tests to facilitate earlier recognition of sleep apnea (outcome) and subsequently prescribe appropriate treatments.

Study Aims:

Aim I: (Screening) For individuals with TBI, determine comparative effectiveness of 2 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) endorsed screening tools (STOPBang Questionnaire \[STOPBang\] vs. Actigraphy \[ACG\]) to identify those at high risk of sleep apnea as diagnosed through Level 1 polysomnography (PSG). Long-term Objectives: To inform clinician's choices for screening measures to determine presence of sleep apnea.

Exploratory Aim:

Evaluate alternative screening tools (Berlin Questionnaire, Multivariate Apnea Prediction Index \[MAPI\]) to Level 1 PSG in Aim 1.

Aim II: (Diagnosis) This study will determine the diagnostic accuracy (non-inferiority) of Level 3 PSG in determining presence of sleep apnea in patients with acute TBI patients in the rehabilitation setting. Level 1 PSG will be used as the criterion standard. Long-term Objectives: To inform clinician's choices of diagnostic tests to determine presence of sleep apnea and prescribe appropriate treatments. If Level 3 portable PSG is equivalent to the less accessible Level 1 PSG, this will increase consumer accessibility.

Study Design:

This is a 3-year, multi-center prospective observational cohort study.

Intervention and Comparators:

In Aim I, the screening tools STOPBang and ACG will be compared against one another to determine their sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients with TBI at risk for sleep apnea. In Aim II, the non-inferiority of Level 3 PSG in determining presence and severity of sleep apnea in patients with moderate to severe TBI will be compared to Level 1 PSG.

Study Population:

Consecutive participants to neurorehabilitation at an existing National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) or VA funded TBIMS Center will make up the study population. Patients will be age 16 and older (18 or older at VA sites), with moderate to severe TBI, admitted for rehabilitation in a U.S. TBIMS inpatient rehabilitation facility, and sleeping \> 2 hours/night suggesting habitual sleep duration. Based on historical data from the six study sites participating in this study, investigators in this study conservatively estimated that 70% of patients admitted for inpatient TBI rehabilitation would consent into this study (N=20/month), resulting in a 13-month enrollment estimate of 259 patients. Power analyses of each study aim suggest that a sample size of 237 is the largest sample size needed for sufficient power. The sites participating in this study aim to collectively enroll 259 patients to account for possible further attrition. Based on TBIMS data acquired over the past 25-years, 44% of the sample is female, 64% are categorized as Non-White, median age is 38 years, with predominantly moderate to severe TBI.

Primary outcomes consist of:

1) Positive predictive power of screening tools: STOPBang and ACG, 2) Equivalency in detection of sleep apnea via Level 1 and Level 3 PSG, with diagnosis of sleep apnea based on overall apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) \> 5.

Analytic Methods:

Aim 1: Investigators expect that STOPBang values \> 5 and abnormal ACG total sleep time (\< 5 hours with desaturation) will produce sufficiently high SEs with reasonable tradeoff in SP (noting that SE and SP are inversely related). Similarly, for Level 1 PSG, a diagnosis of sleep apnea will be made if AHI ≥ 5. Cross-tabulations of STOPBang and ACG screening for high risk of sleep apnea (positive/negative) versus Level 1 PSG diagnosis (positive/negative) will be constructed and estimates of diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals. To address hypothesis 1.1, two-sided McNemar's tests will be used to compare the paired SEs and paired SPs between STOPBang and ACG assuming a significance level of α = 0.05.

Aim 2: The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of Level 3 PSG (compared to Level 1 PSG, the reference gold standard) will each be estimated and compared to fixed hypothesized rates of SE and SP of 90% and 60%, respectively, considered sufficiently large enough. Level 1 PSG (reference) diagnosis of sleep apnea will be made based on AHI ≥ 5. Level 3 PSG (test) diagnosis will be made based AHI ≥ 5. A cross-tabulation of Level 3 PSG (positive/negative) versus Level 1 PSG (positive/negative) will be constructed and standard measures of diagnostic accuracy will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy).To test for non-inferiority of the SE to 90% and the SP to 60%, a non-inferiority threshold of 0.1 is assumed. If the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval for SE is strictly above 80% and the lower bound on the confidence interval for SP is strictly above 50% then non-inferiority of Level 3 PSG (compared to Level 3 PSG) can be established.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. Meet case definition for TBI:

   (A). VA (for James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital): i. Persons fitting the definition of traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined as a traumatically induced structural brain injury, brain trauma, or damage to brain tissue, and/or physiological disruption of brain function as a result of an external mechanical force (also including acceleration/deceleration movement without direct external trauma to the head, a foreign body penetrating the brain, forces generated from events such as a blast or explosion, or other force) as evidenced by self-reported or medically documented (physical examination or mental status examination) new onset or worsening of at least one of the following clinical signs immediately following the event: (a) a period of loss of or a decreased level of consciousness; (b) alteration in mental state at the time of the injury (confusion, disorientation, slowed thinking); (c) loss of memory for events immediately before or after the injury; (d) posttraumatic amnesia (PTA); (d)neurological deficits (weakness, imbalance, change in vision, praxis, paresis/plegia, sensory loss, aphasia, etc.) that may or may not be transient; or (e) intracranial lesion. ii. Age 18 or older at the time of index TBI. iii. Admitted to one of the five designated VA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs) for comprehensive rehabilitation with the presenting diagnoses of TBI. Comprehensive rehabilitation must occur in the PRC and meet the following criteria: (a) Medical and rehabilitation care are supervised on a regular basis by a physician affiliated with the PRC; (b) 24-hour nursing care is provided to the patient; (c) Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), Speech, Rehabilitation Psychology, Neuropsychology, and/or family support/education are provided in an integrated team approach with the expectation of further gain; (d) Operates in a manner consistent with Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) standards for brain injury inpatient rehabilitation and/or Medicare requirements for inpatient rehabilitation.

   OR

   (B). Civilian (for civilian sites): Damage to brain tissue caused by an external mechanical force, alteration of consciousness \> 24 hours, or loss of consciousness \>30 minutes, or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the Emergency Department of3-12, or intracranial abnormalities on imaging regardless of GCS;

   AND
2. admission to an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation program;
3. minimum age 16 years at civilian sites and 18 years at the VA site;
4. Understands and provides informed consent to participate (or, if unable, healthcare proxy / legal guardian understands and provides informed consent for the patient);
5. sleep duration \> 2 hours/night.

Although not specifically targeted, pregnant women and people with intellectual developmental disorders or prior psychiatric histories meeting the above inclusion/exclusion criteria can be enrolled in this study. Individuals with known history of sleep apnea will be eligible for the study and apnea status will be reconfirmed with new diagnostic study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. persons less than 16 years old at civilian sites and less than 18 years old at VA site will not be included;
2. pre-injury diagnosis of narcolepsy or persistent daytime somnolence as documented in patient's medical record and/or family report; and/or
3. tracheostomy placed and decannulation or overnight capping of the tracheostomy not feasible during rehabilitation hospitalization.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI)
timeFrame: During inpatient brain injury rehabilitation, which can occur on average (median) up to 37 days post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) in civilian settings and 132 days in Veterans Affairs (VA) settings.
Secondary outcomes:
Other outcomes:
measure: STOPBang Sleep Apnea Risk
timeFrame: During inpatient brain injury rehabilitation, which can occur on average (median) up to 37 days post-TBI in civilian settings and 132 days in VA settings.
measure: Berlin Sleep Apnea Risk
timeFrame: During inpatient brain injury rehabilitation, which can occur on average (median) up to 37 days post-TBI in civilian settings and 132 days in VA settings.
measure: Actigraphy
timeFrame: During inpatient brain injury rehabilitation, which can occur on average (median) up to 37 days post-TBI in civilian settings and 132 days in VA settings.
measure: Multivariate Apnea Prediction Index (MAPI)
timeFrame: During inpatient brain injury rehabilitation, which can occur on average (median) up to 37 days post-TBI in civilian settings and 132 days in VA settings.
Locations:
city: Englewood
country: United States
facility: Craig Hospital
state: Colorado
city: Tampa
country: United States
facility: James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
state: Florida
city: Columbus
country: United States
facility: The Ohio State University
state: Ohio
city: Elkins Park
country: United States
facility: Albert Einstein Healthcare Network/Moss Rehabilitation Hospital
state: Pennsylvania
city: Dallas
country: United States
facility: Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation
state: Texas
city: Seattle
country: United States
facility: University of Washington
state: Washington
Study officials:
affiliation: James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
name: Risa Richardson, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Holcomb EM, Schwartz DJ, McCarthy M, Thomas B, Barnett SD, Nakase-Richardson R. Incidence, Characterization, and Predictors of Sleep Apnea in Consecutive Brain Injury Rehabilitation Admissions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):82-100. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000230.
citation: Kamper JE, Garofano J, Schwartz DJ, Silva MA, Zeitzer J, Modarres M, Barnett SD, Nakase-Richardson R. Concordance of Actigraphy With Polysomnography in Traumatic Brain Injury Neurorehabilitation Admissions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000215.
citation: Towns SJ, Zeitzer J, Kamper J, Holcomb E, Silva MA, Schwartz DJ, Nakase-Richardson R. Implementation of Actigraphy in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Neurorehabilitation Admissions: A Veterans Administration TBI Model Systems Feasibility Study. PM R. 2016 Nov;8(11):1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 10.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R. Improving the Significance and Direction of Sleep Management in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):79-81. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000235. No abstract available.
citation: Holcomb EM, Towns S, Kamper JE, Barnett SD, Sherer M, Evans C, Nakase-Richardson R. The Relationship Between Sleep-Wake Cycle Disturbance and Trajectory of Cognitive Recovery During Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):108-16. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000206.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R, Sherer M, Barnett SD, Yablon SA, Evans CC, Kretzmer T, Schwartz DJ, Modarres M. Prospective evaluation of the nature, course, and impact of acute sleep abnormality after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;94(5):875-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
citation: Silva MA, Nakase-Richardson R, Sherer M, Barnett SD, Evans CC, Yablon SA. Posttraumatic confusion predicts patient cooperation during traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;91(10):890-3. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825a1648.
citation: Nakase-Thompson R, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Nick TG, Trzepacz PT. Acute confusion following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004 Feb;18(2):131-42. doi: 10.1080/0269905031000149542.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R, Dahdah MN, Almeida E, Ricketti P, Silva MA, Calero K, Magalang U, Schwartz DJ. Concordance between current American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Centers for Medicare and Medicare scoring criteria for obstructive sleep apnea in hospitalized persons with traumatic brain injury: a VA TBI Model System study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Jun 15;16(6):879-888. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8352.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R, Schwartz DJ, Ketchum JM, Drasher-Phillips L, Dahdah MN, Monden KR, Bell K, Hoffman J, Whyte J, Bogner J, Calero K, Magalang U. Comparison of Diagnostic Sleep Studies in Hospitalized Neurorehabilitation Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1689-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.083. Epub 2020 May 6.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R, Hoffman JM, Magalang U, Almeida E, Schwartz DJ, Drasher-Phillips L, Ketchum JM, Whyte J, Bogner J, Dismuke-Greer CE. Cost-Benefit Analysis From the Payor's Perspective for Screening and Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Moderate to Severe TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1497-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 May 4.
citation: Zeitzer JM, Hon F, Whyte J, Monden KR, Bogner J, Dahdah M, Wittine L, Bell KR, Nakase-Richardson R. Coherence Between Sleep Detection by Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Multi-Center, Inpatient Cohort of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2020 Dec;12(12):1205-1213. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12353. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
citation: Martin AM, Almeida EJ, Starosta AJ, Hammond FM, Hoffman JM, Schwartz DJ, Fann JR, Bell KR, Nakase-Richardson R. The Impact of Opioid Medications on Sleep Architecture and Nocturnal Respiration During Acute Recovery From Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A TBI Model Systems Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021 Sep-Oct 01;36(5):374-387. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000727.
citation: Nakase-Richardson R, Schwartz DJ, Drasher-Phillips L, Ketchum JM, Calero K, Dahdah MN, Monden KR, Bell K, Magalang U, Hoffman JM, Whyte J, Bogner J, Zeitzer JM. Comparative Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Screening Instruments During Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Moderate to Severe TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb;101(2):283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 6.