Clinical trial NCT03337204: The Engaged4Life Study: Enhancing the Health-Promoting Effects of Older Adults' Activity Portfolios
Official title: Enhancing the Health-Promoting Effects of Older Adults' Activity Portfolios: The Development, Feasibility and Initial Efficacy of an Ecologically Sensitive Intervention
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Sedentary Lifestyle
Lead sponsor: Boston College
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Institute on Aging (NIA)
First posted: 2017-11-08
Enrollment: 30
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 65
Standard ages: OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: yes
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Primary purpose: PREVENTION

Brief summary: This study designs and tests a multi-component intervention- Engaged4Life- designed to enhance physical activity (PA), cognitive activity (CA), social interaction (SI) and personal meaning (PM) in low-engaged community-dwelling older adults' everyday life activities through: 1) technology-assisted self-monitoring of PA, CA, SI, and PM activity engagement, 2) psycho-education + goal setting (via a 3-hour workshop), and 3) one-on-one peer mentoring (via phone 2X/week for 3 weeks) to support goal implementation. 15 adults age 65 or older will be randomized to receive all 3 intervention components and 15 to receive only the technology-assisted self-monitoring component.

Detailed description: The Social Model of Health Promotion posits that physical, cognitive, and social activity embedded within activities can help maintain or even restore cognitive and functional health in later life and stimulating activities that carry personal meaning or confer a sense of purpose may have stronger health-promoting effects than activities that are just stimulating. While the Experience Corps program-a community volunteering program for older adults designed to explicitly embed these characteristics-is an effective model for health-promotion, this program is not, as of yet, widely accessible. Further, formal volunteering is not always an activity that is attractive or accessible for older adults, and other interventions aimed at promoting social role involvement among older adults have shown only limited effectiveness in doing so. Thus, the current study explores whether it is possible to create an individually-tailored intervention that encourages older adults to 1) carefully examine their existing "activity portfolios" (technology-assisted self-monitoring), 2) empowers them with the knowledge and skills to make improvements upon their "activity portfolios" by enhancing/supplementing activities in ways that increase their overall levels of physical activity, cognitive activity, social interaction, and personal meaning (psycho-education + goal setting via a workshop), and 3) provides social support through peers in implementing their goals (one-on-one peer mentoring). Targeting a sample of community dwelling older adults who are at-risk for adverse cognitive and physical health outcomes due to their sedentary activity levels, we aim to influence positive changes in overall health and well-being in a way that is more practical, effective, and sustainable than prior interventions.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Age of 65 or older
* Low-to-moderate engagement levels as determined by a score of \<10 on a modified version of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) (Hwang, 2010), where only the domains of exercise, social and productive activity, and leisure were included
* A resident of Waltham, MA
* Willing to be randomly assigned to study arm
* Available for relevant study dates

Exclusion Criteria:

* Age of 64 or younger
* Living in an assisted living or nursing home facility
* Significant cognitive impairment (those with \>2 errors on the six-item screener by Callahan, Unverzagt, Hui, Perkins, \& Hendrie, 2002)
* Reports that a doctor has told them that it is unsafe to participate in physical activity

Primary outcomes:
measure: Physical Activity: Steps per day
timeFrame: worn daily for 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Cognitive activity (CA)(assessed daily)
timeFrame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
measure: Social interaction (SI) (assessed daily)
timeFrame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
measure: Personal meaning (PM) (assessed daily)
timeFrame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
Other outcomes:
Locations:
Study officials:
affiliation: Boston College
name: Christina J Costa, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References:
citation: Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007.
citation: Hwang JE. Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging: development and validation of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) using the Rasch measurement model. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):786-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09088.
citation: Heaven B, Brown LJ, White M, Errington L, Mathers JC, Moffatt S. Supporting well-being in retirement through meaningful social roles: systematic review of intervention studies. Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):222-87. doi: 10.1111/milq.12013.
citation: Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman M, Frick KD, Glass TA, Hill J, McGill S, Rebok GW, Seeman T, Tielsch J, Wasik BA, Zeger S. A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health. 2004 Mar;81(1):64-78. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth094.
citation: Fried LP, Carlson MC, McGill S, Seeman T, Xue QL, Frick K, Tan E, Tanner EK, Barron J, Frangakis C, Piferi R, Martinez I, Gruenewald T, Martin BK, Berry-Vaughn L, Stewart J, Dickersin K, Willging PR, Rebok GW. Experience Corps: a dual trial to promote the health of older adults and children's academic success. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 13.
citation: Jenkinson CE, Dickens AP, Jones K, Thompson-Coon J, Taylor RS, Rogers M, Bambra CL, Lang I, Richards SH. Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:773. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-773.