Clinical trial NCT03964467: Priming With tDCS: Expanding the Window of Recovery in Chronic Stroke
Official title: Investigation of Central Priming Prior to Training of the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: UNKNOWN
Phase: NA
Conditions: Upper Extremity Paresis
Keywords: stroke
upper extremity
intervention
transcranial direct current stimulation
actigraph
fMRI
Lead sponsor: University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: Chapman University
name: Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
name: Thomas Jefferson University
First posted: 2019-05-28
Enrollment: 14
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 18
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: PARALLEL
Intervention model description: randomized controlled trial
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Stroke often leads to long-term disability including upper extremity (UE) dysfunction even with the provision of timely rehabilitation services. Brain injury stemming from stroke, affecting the corticospinal system results in weakness, alterations in muscle tone and incoordination during the performance of functional tasks. Recovery of functional task performance after injury to the corticospinal system involves a residual neural network that engages the premotor cortex, frontal cortex and supplementary motor cortex. In particular, the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) is anatomically and physiologically poised to reorganize and support motor recovery after corticospinal damage. The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility and efficacy of stimulating the ipsilesional PMd in adults with chronic stroke using noninvasive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during the training sessions of a 4-week circuit-based, UE, task-related training (TRT) program. Pilot data from six adults, using anodal tDCS over the injured PMd just before each session of TRT, led to significant improvements in UE function in 5 of the 6 adults after only 4 weeks of training. We will assess the motor function of both arms using clinical assessments immediately before and after the 4-week TRT program. In addition to effects of tDCS-primed UE-TRT on clinical outcomes, we will use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine the changes in neural network reorganization. We hypothesize that the training program will reveal significant improvement in motor function based on clinical assessment as well as significant global network changes based on resting state functional MRI and hybrid diffusion MR imaging. The long-term goal of this research is to develop an effective intervention strategy to improve UE function in individuals with moderate impairment from chronic stroke.

Detailed description: AIM 1: To determine if UE motor performance significantly improves in individuals with moderate impairment from chronic stroke, following anodal tDCS applied to the ipsilesional PMd during circuit-based, UE, TRT conducted three times/week for 4-weeks. Hypothesis: Following a 4-week, tDCS-paired UE TRT program, there will be significant changes in unimanual and bimanual performance in individuals with moderate impairment from chronic stroke, as detected by clinical assessments. Our primary measure will be UE accelerometry gathered with wrist-based ActiGraphs; a secondary measure will be the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT).

AIM 2: To determine if there are significant structural and functional brain changes in individuals with moderate impairment from chronic stroke, following anodal tDCS applied to the ipsilesional PMd paired with circuit-based, UE, TRT conducted 3 times/week for 4-weeks. Hypothesis: Following a 4-week, tDCS-paired UE TRT program, there will be significant structural/functional brain changes as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). Based on prior work,4,10 we expect that there will be an increase in resting state functional connectivity as shown using BOLD fMRI between the cerebellum and cortical areas.

Task related training (TRT) is a treatment approach that aims to increase use of the paretic arm, avoid learned disuse and minimize compensation (Thielman et al, 2004). It involves variable practice of goal-directed, functional movements in a natural environment (Ada et al, 1994) focusing on solving movement problems (Gentile, 2000). Task related training has been found to significantly improve paretic arm function post-stroke, in individuals with baseline UE FM \< 35 (Kim et al., 2013; Thielman et al., 2004; Thielman, 2015; Wu et al, 2000).

The effects of TRT could be augmented with noninvasive brain stimulation pairing. Motor priming before or during task practice has been found to foster motor learning and UE function in healthy individuals and persons post-stroke by increasing neuroplasticity (Fusco et al., 2014; Stoykov and Madhavan, 2015; Stoykov and Stinear, 2010). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one form of stimulation (Fusco et al., 2014). Anodal tDCS increases neuronal excitability by depolarizing the membrane potential while cathodal tDCS decreases excitability and hyperpolarizes the membrane potential (Nitsche and Paulus, 2001). After effects from anodal tDCS stimulation, involving activation of NDMA receptors associated with long-term potentiation, have been shown to last up to 120 minutes (min) (Madhavan and Shah, 2012). Anodal tDCS administered during intervention has a greater impact on UE function than therapy or tDCS alone (Bolognini et al., 2011; Butler et al., 2013; Cho et al., 2015; Lee and Lee, 2015; Yao et al., 2015). While the receipt of tDCS during therapeutic interventions is promising, it can limit the therapy to seated or more sedentary programs. Given the support in the literature, we believe it may be more effective to foster neuroplasticity and UE functional recovery in chronic stroke survivors if tDCS is done repetitively, during participation in a dynamic UE standing program. Our circuit-based, UE TRT standing program requires more aerobic effort from participants than seated programming and greater aerobic effort has been shown to foster neuroplasticity in persons post-stroke (Mang et al., 2013; Quaney et al., 2009).

Expanding Plasticity Beyond the Motor Cortex. The dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) may be a more suitable neural substrate for promoting recovery in moderately impaired individuals. While the results of anodal priming over the ipsilesional motor cortex are promising, the effects have primarily been limited to persons with mild impairments. For persons with moderate impairment, a substantial portion of the motor cortex and/or corticospinal system is damaged leaving less neural substrate within M1 than can be targeted using anodal tDCS. In such individuals, alternative cortical sites may have greater potential to reorganize and implement motor recovery. Previously, we (Kantak et. al., 2012) and others (Plow et al., 2016) proposed that the PMd may be uniquely poised to reorganize and implement recovery after motor cortex injury. The PMd contributes to over 30% of descending corticospinal fibers (Barbas and Pandya, 1987; Dum and Strick, 2002). Further, the PMd has been shown to reorganize after stroke, contributing to motor performance (Fridman et al., 2004; Kantak et al., 2012; Mohapatra et al., 2016). We believe that the benefit of priming the PMd before engaging in circuit-based, UE TRT warrants further investigation.

Brain Imaging. Using hybrid diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI (fMRI) to quantify structural and functional changes in the brain is critical to understand behavioral change post-injury and with training. Functional organization of intact cortical tissue post-stroke is dependent on the post-injury behavioral experience (O'Shea et al, 2007). Neuroimaging has been used to show an increase in neural activity in persons who engage in TRT post-stroke (Nelles et al,2001). By using fMRI to assess brain function, the volume of activation in regional brain areas can be determined, which could be used to predict treatment outcome (Cramer, 2008).

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

1. \> 18-75 years of age;
2. diagnosis of ≥ 1 stroke \> 6 months before participation;
3. in good health;
4. classified with moderate impairment based on the UE Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA; score of 19-47
5. safe for the MRI environment;
6. able to elevate and hold the paretic arm for 2 seconds at 90 degs shoulder elevation, 160-180O elbow extension and neutral forearm supination;
7. ≥ 20 degrees gravity minimized wrist extension while holding a cylindrical object on a tabletop.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. bone or joint limitations that restrict paretic arm motion;
2. history of skull fractures or burr hole(s);
3. resting heart rate and resting blood pressure outside the range of 40-100 beats/min and 90/60 to 170/90 mm Hg respectively;
4. chest pain or shortness of breath at rest;
5. history epilepsy or seizures;
6. Botox injections to the paretic arm within 4 months of participation.

Primary outcomes:
measure: UE Accelerometry
timeFrame: 3 day period prior to training
measure: UE Accelerometry
timeFrame: 3 day period post training to assess change- more activity inbdicates greater overall use
measure: Functional MRI
timeFrame: within 3 days prior to training
measure: Functional MRI
timeFrame: within 3 days post training to measure change- increased activity in designated areas explains pattern of neuroplasticity
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days prior to training start
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days post training
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days prior to training start
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days post training
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days prior to training start
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days post training
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days prior to training start
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days post training
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days prior to training start
measure: Body Structure Function and Impairment Data
timeFrame: 1-3 days post training
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Philadelphia
country: United States
facility: University of the Sciences
state: Pennsylvania
Study officials:
affiliation: Professor
name: Gregory Thielman, EdD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
References: