Clinical trial NCT00395304: Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Best Add-On Therapy Giving Effective Response (BADGER)
Official title: Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network Trial - Best Add-On Therapy Giving Effective Response (BADGER)
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: PHASE3
Conditions: Asthma
Lead sponsor: Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Sponsor class: OTHER
Collaborators: name: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
First posted: 2006-11-02
Enrollment: 182
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 6
Maximum age (years): 18
Standard ages: CHILD
ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Primary purpose: TREATMENT

Brief summary: Asthma is a common, serious illness among children in the United States. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may effectively control symptoms, some children may require additional medications to maintain adequate asthma control. This study compares the effectiveness of a higher dose of ICS, ICS combined with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) medication, and ICS combined with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) medication at reducing the impact and severity of asthma exacerbations that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

Detailed description: Almost 9 million children in the United States have asthma, and it is a leading cause of hospitalizations and school absenteeism. Common asthma symptoms include wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing. While there is no cure for asthma, most children who receive proper treatment are able to control symptoms and lead a normal life. Low doses of ICS are commonly prescribed to prevent symptoms and keep asthma under control. While this is usually sufficient to prevent asthma attacks, some children do not respond well to low dose ICS alone. For these children, their asthma symptoms may be more effectively controlled by either receiving a higher dose of ICS or receiving LABA or LTRA medications in combination with a low dose of ICS. Both LABA and LTRA medications are used to help control moderate to severe asthma. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a high dose of ICS versus a low dose of ICS plus either LABA or LTRA medication at improving asthma control and reducing the severity of symptoms that occur in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

This study began with an 8-week screening period during which participants were monitored while they used an inhaler with a low dose of ICS medication. During this time, participants also attended one or two study visits. At each visit, participants underwent a physical examination, exhaled nitric oxide analysis, and lung function and airway pressure testing. After enrollment criteria were met, participants underwent these same evaluations again, and they completed questionnaires to assess asthma control, quality of life, and home environmental factors. Blood was collected and a methacholine challenge test was completed, which artificially triggers an asthma attack to determine the severity of an individual's asthma. Participants then were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences, each of which includes the following three regimens in a different order:

* Low dose of ICS and salmeterol, a LABA medication
* Low dose of ICS and montelukast, a LTRA medication
* Double dose of ICS

Each treatment period lasted 16 weeks, with study visits occurring weekly. A physical examination, blood collection, lung function and airway pressure testing, a methacholine challenge test, and questionnaires occurred at selected visits. Throughout the study, participants recorded asthma symptoms, peak expiratory flow rates, and rescue medication usage in a daily diary. The entire length of the study did not exceed 56 weeks.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Able to perform reproducible spirometry according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria
* History of asthma symptoms (e.g., cough, wheezing, shortness of breath) and meets at least one of the following criteria:

  1. Naïve to controller therapy and meeting National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) criteria for mild-moderate persistent asthma (symptoms at least 2 days per week and/or night-time awakenings due to asthma at least 2 nights per month)
  2. Current uncontrolled asthma (meets NAEPP criteria for mild-moderate persistent asthma) while receiving an ICS dose greater than or equal to 200 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent or some form of non-ICS controller therapy (e.g., montelukast, theophylline, cromolyn)
  3. Asthma is currently under control while receiving an ICS dose between 300 to 400 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent and willing to consider changing current treatment to monotherapy with one dose of ICS (current standard of care)
  4. Asthma is currently under control while receiving some form of combination therapy, such as ICS less than or equal to 200 ug per day of fluticasone equivalent in addition to a non-ICS controller therapy (e.g., LABA, montelukast, theophylline, cromolyn), and willing to consider changing current treatment to monotherapy with one dose of ICS (current standard of care)
* FEV1 reversibility of at least 12% following bronchodilator administration (4 puffs) at study visit 1. Individuals will need to hold albuterol, montelukast, theophylline, ipratropium bromide (or other anticholinergics) and LABAs per study instructions prior to reversibility testing. If an individual is receiving these types of medications prior to study visit 1, he/she may be brought back to the clinical center within 1 week following appropriate medication withholding to attempt qualification by reversibility criteria. If the individual does not meet this requirement, they may qualify for enrollment if their PC20 methacholine FEV1 is less than or equal to 12.5 mg/ml at the time of randomization. If FEV1 is less than 70%, thus precluding the methacholine challenge at this visit, then completion of the visit will be postponed several days and an additional attempt to obtain a methacholine challenge test will be made. If the methacholine challenge still cannot be performed, an individual may still qualify by reversibility criteria at this visit.
* History of clinical varicella or varicella vaccine; individuals needing the vaccine may receive it from their primary care physician prior to study entry
* Ability of parent to provide informed consent; verbal assent must be obtained from children less than 7 years of age and written assent must be obtained from children between 7 and 18 years of age
* If female, willing to use an effective form of contraception

Prior to being randomly assigned to a treatment group, participants must meet the following criteria to remain in the study:

* Lack of acceptable asthma control during the 8-week screening period as defined by the following criteria:

  1) On average, on more than 2 days per week, one or all of the following:
  1. Diary-reported symptoms
  2. The use of inhaled bronchodilator (not including pre-exercise)
  3. Peak flows in the yellow zone (less than 80% of post bronchodilator PEF value obtained at study visit 1) OR
* On average, more than 1 night-time awakening due to asthma, during each 2-week period

Exclusion Criteria:

* Corticosteroid treatment for any condition prior to study entry within the following defined timepoints:

  1. Oral - Use within 2 weeks of the screening visit
  2. Injectable - Use within 2 weeks of the screening visit
  3. Nasal - May be used at any time during the study at the discretion of the study investigator or primary care physician
* Current or prior use of medications known to significantly interact with corticosteroid disposition (within a 2-week period of study visit 1), including but not limited to carbamazepine, erythromycin or other macrolide antibiotics, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, or ketoconazole
* Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 less than 60% predicted at study visit 1
* More than three hospitalizations for asthma in the year prior to study entry
* Presence of chronic or active lung disease other than asthma
* Significant medical illness other than asthma, including thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, Cushing's disease, Addison's disease, hepatic disease, or concurrent medical problems that could require oral corticosteroids during the study or would place the participant at increased risk while participating in the study
* History of cataracts, glaucoma, or any other medical disorder associated with an adverse effect to corticosteroids
* Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms not controlled by standard medical therapy
* History of significant asthma exacerbation within 2 weeks of study visit 1 or more than 5 courses of systemic corticosteroids in the year prior to study entry
* History of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, or resulting in a hypoxic seizure within the 5 years prior to study entry
* History of adverse reactions to ICS, LTRA, or LABA preparations or any of their ingredients
* Receiving hyposensitization therapy other than an established maintenance regimen (i.e., continuous regimen for at least 3 months prior to study entry)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Inability to perform study procedures
* Refusal to consent to a genotype evaluation
* Inability of the child to ingest the study drug
* Cigarette smoking or smokeless tobacco use in the year prior to study entry
* Current participation or participation in the month prior to study entry in another investigational drug trial
* Evidence that the family may be unreliable or nonadherent, or may move from the clinical center area before study completion

Primary outcomes:
measure: The Number of Participants With a Differential Response to the Three Step-up Therapies Based on Fixed Threshold Criteria for the Following Three Asthma Control Measures: Use of Oral Prednisone for Acute Asthma Exacerbations, Asthma Control Days and FEV1.
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) % Predicted
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Post-bronchodilator FEV1 Percent Predicted
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % Predicted
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC Ratio
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) % Predicted
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) Variability
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Impulse Oscillometry Resistance at 5 Hertz
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Logarithm Base 2 of the Methacholine PC20
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Natural Logarithm of Exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT)
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
measure: Number of Participants With Asthma Exacerbations
timeFrame: Measured during the last 12 weeks of each 16-week treatment period
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Tucson
country: United States
facility: University of Arizona College of Medicine
state: Arizona
city: San Diego
country: United States
facility: Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
state: California
city: Denver
country: United States
facility: National Jewish Medical and Research Center
state: Colorado
city: Saint Louis
country: United States
facility: Washington University School of Medicine
state: Missouri
city: Madison
country: United States
facility: University of Wisconsin - Madison
state: Wisconsin
Study officials:
affiliation: Penn State College of Medicine
name: David T. Mauger, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: National Jewish Health
name: Stanley J. Szefler, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Wisconsin, Madison
name: Robert F. Lemanske, Jr., MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
name: Robert S. Zeiger, MD, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: Washington University School of Medicine
name: Robert C. Strunk, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Arizona College of Medicine
name: Fernando D. Martinez, MD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Denver
name: Lynn M. Taussig, MD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Lemanske RF Jr, Mauger DT, Sorkness CA, Jackson DJ, Boehmer SJ, Martinez FD, Strunk RC, Szefler SJ, Zeiger RS, Bacharier LB, Covar RA, Guilbert TW, Larsen G, Morgan WJ, Moss MH, Spahn JD, Taussig LM; Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):975-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001278. Epub 2010 Mar 2.