Clinical trial NCT03360604: Utilizing Glycaemic Index: An Investigation of the Glycaemia and Cognition in Type 2 Diabetes
Official title: Utilizing Glycaemic Index: An Investigation of the Glycaemic Profiles and Cognitive Performance Displayed by Type 2 Diabetics Across the Course of a Day in Low and High Glycaemic Conditions
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Overall status: COMPLETED
Phase: NA
Conditions: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Cognitive Impairment
Keywords: glycaemic index
glycaemia
diabetes mellitus
type 2 diabetes
Lead sponsor: University of Reading
Sponsor class: OTHER
First posted: 2017-12-04
Enrollment: 25
Sex: ALL
Minimum age (years): 40
Maximum age (years): 70
Standard ages: ADULT
OLDER_ADULT
Accepts healthy volunteers: no
Allocation: RANDOMIZED
Intervention model: CROSSOVER
Intervention model description: All participants took part in both conditions
Primary purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE

Brief summary: The current study aims to investigate the effects of two GI diets (low vs. high GI) in a sample (25 participants) that has diet controlled type 2 diabetes. This sample has been chosen as those with diabetes have been shown to suffer with poor glucose tolerance, along with the associated deficits such as compromised cognitive function. Therefore, it is expected that differences produced by the two diets on blood glucose concentrations and cognitive performance will be greater than those previously seen. If this is the case after analyzing the results, it will provide a potential strategy (diet) for improving glucose tolerance and cognitive performance in a vulnerable section of the population.

Detailed description: With the introduction of the glycemic index in 1981, which can be defined as a measure of carbohydrate quality within foods, there has been a wealth of research into its' application to cognitive function. This research has been based on the theory that the availability of blood-borne glucose can have an impact on cognitive performance. This is supported by work that has shown that the brain consumes an immense amount of energy relative to the rest of the body, but possesses minute stores of glycogen which it could convert into its main energy source; glucose. This means the brain is reliant on the glucose supplied to it by the blood, which in turn requires the consumption of foods that can be broken down into glucose.

With this in mind, the vast majority of literature has focussed on the acute effects that foods differing in glycemic values may have on cognitive function, and have found many relevant findings such as less cognitive performance decline across the morning for children who eat a low GI breakfast. This could be explained as a low GI breakfast will contain higher quality carbohydrates, or in other words; slower absorbing carbohydrates, which would suggest the brain has access to a steady supply of glucose across the more.

Interesting work in the field of physiology has proposed the presence of a second meal effect, which can be defined as the glycemic index of a meal having an effect on the glycemic response to a subsequent meal. Surprisingly, there are very few pieces of psychology literature that investigate the possibility of a second cognitive meal effect, which is based on the theory that if a meals' GI can affect the glycemic response to a subsequent meal, then it may also have an effect on cognitive function. However, research into this has found some evidence for such an effect.

Although, there has been a wealth of research into the glycemic index as a whole, the methodology varies greatly from study to study. These problems are most evident when looking at the times that cognitive function tests are administered. For research based upon a theory that relies on availability of blood-borne glucose, the times of cognitive testing do not always align themselves with the time points that the glycemic response indicates are ideal testing times.

An initial study by the investigators looked to resolve the current lack of consistency amongst previous research by providing participants with three meals throughout the course of a day, whilst measuring blood glucose via finger prick. The aim was to identify where the biggest differences in blood glucose occur when looking at the results of a sample of 24 healthy participants. The time points identified would then provide information as to when significant differences in cognitive performance throughout the day may be expected.

A second study fed a larger healthy sample (40 participants) the same meals, but also included a cognitive task battery. Results from the blood glucose concentrations supported results from study 1, with the two diets producing measureable differences in the glycaemic profiles produced across a test day. This is another step into potentially producing a diet that could promote healthy glucose regulation and cognitive function.

The current study aims to investigate the effects of two GI diets (low vs. high GI) in a sample (25 participants) that has diet controlled type 2 diabetes. This sample has been chosen as those with diabetes have been shown to suffer with poor glucose tolerance, along with the associated deficits such as compromised cognitive function. Therefore, it is expected that differences produced by the two diets on blood glucose concentrations and cognitive performance will be greater than those previously seen. If this is the case after analyzing the results, it will provide a potential strategy (diet) for improving glucose tolerance and cognitive performance in a vulnerable section of the population.

Eligibility criteria: Inclusion Criteria:

* Aged between 40 and 70 years of age.
* Willing to participate in the entire study.
* Male of female (not pregnant).
* Currently have type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Presence of any food intolerances or allergies.
* Being an elite athlete (very intense exercise more than 3 times a week).
* A history of drug or alcohol abuse.
* Presence of cancer.
* Presence of clinically diagnosed depression.

Primary outcomes:
measure: Change in cognitive performance on a Choice Reaction Time task
timeFrame: This test lasts 3 minutes. Participants are tested 9 times on each test day. There are two test days. Giving a total of 18 times, or approximately 54 minutes of performing this task across the entire study.
measure: Change in cognitive performance on a Rapid Visual Information Processing task
timeFrame: This test lasts 3 minutes. Participants are tested 9 times on each test day. There are two test days. Giving a total of 18 times, or approximately 54 minutes of performing this task across the entire study.
measure: Change in cognitive performance on a combined Choice Reaction Time and Rapid Visual Information Processing task
timeFrame: This test lasts 5 minutes. Participants are tested 9 times on each test day. There are two test days. Giving a total of 18 times, or approximately 90 minutes of performing this task across the entire study.
measure: Change in cognitive performance on a Letter Memory Task
timeFrame: This test lasts 5 minutes. Participants are tested 9 times on each test day. There are two test days. Giving a total of 18 times, or approximately 90 minutes of performing this task across the entire study.
Secondary outcomes:
measure: Glycaemic profile
timeFrame: This is measured continuously throughout each day. Each day last approximately 9 hours. There are two test days. Giving a total of 18 hours of continuous glucose monitoring per participant.
measure: Mood (alertness, anxiety and contentment) measured by Bond & Lader (1974) Visual Analogue Scale
timeFrame: This was measured 6 times a day (every 90 minutes starting at 0 minutes/baseline), giving a total of 12 times. Each time lasts approximately 5 minutes, giving a total of 60 minutes overall. Data will be reported for the duration of this 3 year PhD award.
measure: Sleepiness
timeFrame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
measure: Hunger
timeFrame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
measure: Fullness
timeFrame: This takes approximately 30 seconds to complete. Participants were tested six times a day. There were two test days. Giving a total of 12 times, or approximately 6 minutes overall.
Other outcomes:
Locations:
city: Reading
country: United Kingdom
facility: Hugh Sinclair Unit, University of Reading
state: Berkshire
Study officials:
affiliation: University of Reading
name: Daniel J Lamport, PhD
role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
affiliation: University of Reading
name: Matthew J Grout, PhD
role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
affiliation: University of Reading
name: Julie A Lovegrove, PhD
role: STUDY_CHAIR
References:
citation: Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, Bowling AC, Newman HC, Jenkins AL, Goff DV. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Mar;34(3):362-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362.
citation: Amiel SA. Nutrition of the brain: macronutrient supply. Proc Nutr Soc. 1994 Jul;53(2):401-5. doi: 10.1079/pns19940045. No abstract available.
citation: Gomez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):568-78. doi: 10.1038/nrn2421.
citation: Ingwersen J, Defeyter MA, Kennedy DO, Wesnes KA, Scholey AB. A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning. Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.06.009. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
citation: Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Ocana AM, Rao VA, Collier GR. Second-meal effect: low-glycemic-index foods eaten at dinner improve subsequent breakfast glycemic response. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Oct;48(4):1041-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.4.1041.
citation: Lamport DJ, Hoyle E, Lawton CL, Mansfield MW, Dye L. Evidence for a second meal cognitive effect: glycaemic responses to high and low glycaemic index evening meals are associated with cognition the following morning. Nutr Neurosci. 2011 Mar;14(2):66-71. doi: 10.1179/1476830511Y.0000000002.
citation: Lamport DJ, Lawton CL, Mansfield MW, Moulin CA, Dye L. Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance are associated with word memory source monitoring recollection deficits but not simple recognition familiarity deficits following water, low glycaemic load, and high glycaemic load breakfasts. Physiol Behav. 2014 Jan 30;124:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Oct 30.