opened
therealpxc
username_0
###### Motivation for this change
new upstream release

###### Things done

- [x] Tested using sandboxing
  ([nix.useSandbox](http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/options.html#opt-nix.useSandbox) on NixOS,
    or option `build-use-sandbox` in [`nix.conf`](http://nixos.org/nix/manual/#sec-conf-file)
    on non-NixOS)
- Built on platform(s)
   - [x] NixOS
   - [ ] macOS
   - [ ] Linux
- [ ] Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using `nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"`
- [x] Tested execution of all binary files (usually in `./result/bin/`)
- [x] Fits [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md).

---
ppsspp: 1.1.0 -> 1.3
issue
created
therealpxc
username_0
attn @username_2 

this is my resubmit of the [old PR for the same thing](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/23970#issuecomment-288928733)
comment
created
therealpxc
username_0
Cleaned up the maintainers field as you suggested. :-)
comment
created
Fuuzetsu
username_1
Does it work? IIRC some old version of ppsspp started to segfault straight away on me (hence why it was in 1.0 for ages)
comment
created
therealpxc
username_0
Yes, it does work. I logged many hours with this version (on NixOS 16.09) a couple months ago. I don't have time to do the same kind of ‘testing’ right now for master or NixOS 17.03, but I encourage you to give it a try and let me know if there are any problems on your end. I don't expect the one you've described, although I have experienced occasional segfaults in the middle of use (not enough to get me to throw my controller in frustration or anything, I mean like once or twice over the course of a few days with hours of play on each).
comment
created
therealpxc
username_0
Can I ask what's going on with Travis CI, btw? It seems like literally every time I view a NixOS PR, it says the build has failed. What's up with that?
comment
created
ndowens
username_2
It has been having issues. I can't explain why, but lately it is normal
comment
created
joachifm
username_3
Darwin build fails https://travis-ci.org/NixOS/nixpkgs/jobs/214740202, is that expected? If nobody cares to fix it, perhaps darwin should be removed from platforms.
comment
created
AndersonTorres
username_4
It's better to exclude it. Well, I don't know the specific status of Darwin on NixOS/Nixpkgs, then I think it is better to not put so much worry trying to port anything to it (at least for now).
comment
created
therealpxc
username_0
I would try my hand at it, but I don't own a Mac and I am (for the next few weeks at least) still a student, so I'm not about to buy one. I think it's cool that in principle Nix is cross-platform, so if I had some money it would be different. So I agree with the consensus that for now we should drop it, pending any volunteers on the OS X side.
comment
created
AndersonTorres
username_4
About it, I am thinking about work the FreeBSD and BSDs in general about cross-platform and portability issues. But I need more time management in my real life issues.
comment
created
therealpxc
username_0
@username_4 I feel personally attacked by this relatable content
comment