opened
marliekeverweij
username_0
![Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 16 35 19](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/32833996/60027618-18685280-969e-11e9-99c7-e63548d4efa4.png)

- This adjustment simplified the housing type sliders; these now only update the area-file, the useful heat demand in the nodes and insulation costs
- However, the total number of houses input statement now updates everything else (see [input statement](https://github.com/quintel/etsource/blob/d7ee58d3a432546e46b4cf1e3ecffe8ab8db6ff7/inputs/demand/households/households_misc/households_number_of_residences.ad) for more information)

Fixes https://github.com/quintel/etmodel/issues/3024

I have send this PR to the three of you, because I think it's good to test it well, but maybe not everybody! So if you have time :) I did test it locally already!

@username_2 will create the scenario migration for these sliders

(Related issue: https://github.com/quintel/etsource/issues/2062)
 Change housing type sliders to shares instead of number of units
issue
created
antw
username_1
Do the sliders sum correctly to 100% in a blank scenario? Judging by the inputs, it seems like they should (as long as `AREA(number_of_residences)` equals `SUM(AREA(number_of_apartments), AREA(number_of_corner_houses), ...)`.

I would expect that ETModel would then ensure that the group balances correctly; do you get an error back from ETEngine?
comment
created
redekok
username_2
False alarm! The share groups weren't defined correctly in my local admin of ETModel. The inputs are balancing well now.
comment