Citation: 4A_287/2022 E. B

B.a. Am 11. März 2020 leiteten die Klägerinnen ein Schiedsverfahren nach den Swiss Rules of International Arbitration der Swiss Chambers' Arbitration Institution (Swiss Rules, Ausgabe 2012) gegen die Beklagten ein mit den folgenden (im Laufe des Schiedsverfahrens angepassten) Rechtsbegehren: "1. To order Respondents to grant to Claimant 2, or procure the grant to Claimant 2 of, royalty free, assignable, sub-licensable, world-wide, exclusive licenses a) limited to the field of activity the Spice Businesses were engaged in as of 22 December 2012 and/or 30 September 2013; and b) pursuant to the (other) terms and conditions set out in each of the License Agreements dated 28 September 2013 between Respondents as licensors and Claimant 2 as licensee; under all Intellectual Property Rights and Know How (as defined in the SAPA) owned or controlled by Respondents and its Affiliates on 22 December 2012 and/or 30 September 2013 required to research, develop, manufacture, have manufactured, use, sell, offer for sale, have sold, distribute, supply and/or otherwise exploit the products in Annex 1.