Citation: 4A_216/2023 E. 1

" 112. (...) The Sole Arbitrator accepts that there is evidence of a substantive right under Kazakhstan law to reduce the salaries of employees during periods of downtime but there is no evidence that the correct procedure was followed to enforce the right, and no independant legal advice from a legal practitioner that confirms the application of Kazakhstan law in these circumstances. On balance, and based on the available evidence, the Sole Arbitrator is not persuaded that the salary reduction was imposed lawfully under Kazakhstan law. To prove the fact of Kazakhstan law, evidence in the form of an expert legal opinion is required.... ". Pour le reste, c'est en vain que l'intéressé se plaint de ce que l'arbitre n'a pas exposé les raisons pour lesquelles elle a appliqué les directives non contraignantes de la FIFA pour la gestion des conséquences juridiques du Covid-19, étant rappelé ici qu'il ne saurait obtenir des explications détaillées sur chaque aspect du raisonnement tenu par l'arbitre.