Thank you for your answer, Minister, and I do applaud you for making that a mandatory part of the curriculum. I recently had the pleasure of meeting with Hafan Cymru to discuss the Welsh Government-funded Spectrum project. I was very impressed by that, with the age-appropriate content around healthy relationships and domestic abuse that they offer to Welsh schools, and, crucially, free of charge as well, which is quite a rarity these days. When our schools do reconvene after the coronavirus epidemic is over, I'm sure that our pupils will need support in these areas more than ever. So, how is the Welsh Government encouraging schools in Wales to take up the sessions that Spectrum offers?

Diolch am eich ateb, Weinidog, ac rwy'n eich canmol am wneud hynny'n rhan orfodol o'r cwricwlwm. Yn ddiweddar, cefais y pleser o gyfarfod â Hafan Cymru i drafod prosiect Sbectrwm a ariennir gan Lywodraeth Cymru. Gwnaeth argraff fawr arnaf, gyda'r cynnwys sy'n briodol i oedran ar berthnasoedd iach a cham-drin domestig y maent yn ei gynnig i ysgolion Cymru, ac yn hollbwysig, yn rhad ac am ddim hefyd, sy'n beth prin y dyddiau hyn. Pan fydd ein hysgolion yn ailymgynnull ar ôl i epidemig y coronafeirws ddod i ben, rwy'n siŵr y bydd angen mwy o gefnogaeth nag erioed ar ein disgyblion yn y meysydd hyn. Felly, sut y mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn annog ysgolion yng Nghymru i fanteisio ar y sesiynau y mae Sbectrwm yn eu cynnig?

Thank you for your answer, Minister. There have been various concerns raised around the 10 per cent tree-planting element of the scheme. The one specific area that I wanted to raise with you is that there are concerns that parts of farms will now be classed as woodland, which could mean that farmers will now be subject to inheritance tax. Now, as I've understood it, the sustainable farming scheme does not define what 'tree covering' includes, and therefore the relevance of current stipulations for agricultural relief isn't possible to determine. So, can I ask: was this issue considered in the design of the scheme? If not, why not? And how will this specific issue be addressed?

Diolch am eich ateb, Gweinidog. Codwyd amrywiaeth o bryderon ynghylch elfen plannu coed 10 y cant y cynllun. Yr un maes penodol yr oeddwn i eisiau ei godi gyda chi yw bod pryderon y bydd rhannau o ffermydd yn cael eu hystyried yn goetir bellach, a allai olygu y bydd ffermwyr bellach yn destun treth etifeddiaeth. Nawr, fel yr wyf i wedi ei ddeall, nid yw'r cynllun ffermio cynaliadwy yn diffinio'r hyn y mae 'gorchudd coed' yn ei gynnwys, ac felly nid yw'n bosibl penderfynu ar berthnasedd yr amodau presennol ar gyfer rhyddhad amaethyddol. Felly, a gaf i ofyn: a gafodd y mater hwn ei ystyried yn nyluniad y cynllun? Os ddim, pam ddim? A sut bydd y mater penodol hwn yn cael sylw?

Llywydd, nitrogen dioxide levels have been monitored before and after the initial implementation of that 50 mph speed limit. Findings will be monitored and reported before the end of this month, when a full 12 months' worth of post-implementation data will have been collated and analysed.

Llywydd, mae lefelau nitrogen deuocsid wedi cael eu monitro cyn ac ar ôl cyflwyno'r terfyn cyflymder 50 mya hwnnw. Bydd y canfyddiadau'n cael eu monitro a'u hadrodd cyn diwedd y mis hwn, pan fydd gwerth 12 mis llawn o ddata ôl-gyflwyno wedi ei gasglu a'i ddadansoddi.