Thank you very much. If you saw our earlier session this morning, you'll appreciate that we're quite short of time. So, if I can ask for answers and responses that are as succinct as possible, and we'll go straight to Alun Davies's questions first.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Os oeddech chi wedi gweld ein sesiwn yn gynharach y bore yma, byddwch chi'n gwybod ein bod ni'n eithaf byr o amser. Felly, gaf i ofyn am gwestiynau ac atebion mor gryno ag sy'n bosibl plîs? Fe wnawn ni symud yn syth at gwestiynau Alun Davies yn gyntaf.

As it should be. Labour's Ann Jones posted a social media video in this very Senedd saying that the Welsh Government would deliver on the north Denbighshire community hospital, and that Labour was working for the people of the Vale of Clwyd. Now, this video has been conveniently deleted and confined to the bowels of history, but I know what I've seen, Minister, and I have a good memory, unfortunately for you. So, will you now admit that you've failed my constituents in Denbighshire, and that you've broken trust with them in believing that your party was working for local residents?

Fel y dylai fod. Fe gyhoeddodd Ann Jones o'r Blaid Lafur fideo ar y cyfryngau cymdeithasol yn yr union Senedd hon yn dweud y byddai Llywodraeth Cymru'n darparu ysbyty cymunedol gogledd sir Ddinbych, a bod Llafur yn gweithio i bobl Dyffryn Clwyd. Nawr, mae'r fideo wedi cael ei ddileu a'i anghofio, yn gyfleus iawn, ond rwy'n gwybod beth a welais, Weinidog, ac mae gennyf gof da, yn anffodus i chi. Felly, a wnewch chi gyfaddef nawr eich bod wedi gwneud cam â fy etholwyr yn sir Ddinbych, a'ch bod wedi eu twyllo i gredu bod eich plaid yn gweithio ar ran trigolion lleol?

No, I think that's something that you like to get out there that that's the case. It really isn't -

Nac ydy, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n rhywbeth rydych chi'n hoffi ei ddweud, mai felly y mae hi. Nid yw'n wir o gwbl -

I thank the Member for his question. I have begun to consider how technology could be used in helping us make Welsh law easier to find and understand. I recently met with the National Archives and with a judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia to discuss law as a form of data and how artificial intelligence could make law more accessible and easier to administer.

Diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn. rwyf wedi dechrau ystyried sut y gellid defnyddio technoleg i'n helpu i wneud cyfraith Cymru yn haws i ddod o hyd iddi a'i deall. Cefais gyfarfod yn ddiweddar â'r Archifau Gwladol a barnwr Goruchaf Lys British Columbia i drafod cyfraith fel math o ddata a sut y gallai deallusrwydd artiffisial wneud y gyfraith yn fwy hygyrch ac yn haws ei gweinyddu.

Thank you. If the comprehensive system has been so wonderful, and has worked so well, why are we now talking - ? Every time I hear anybody talking about education in this Chamber, it's to change things, to alter things; that things have to be done better. Why is it now, after 50 years of the comprehensive system, you are suddenly waking up to the fact that vocational and academic qualifications are two different things, and there are different pupils who have to be used on those two different academic abilities?

Diolch. Os yw'r system gyfun wedi bod mor wych, ac wedi gweithio mor dda, pam rydym yn siarad yn awr - ? Bob tro y byddaf yn clywed unrhyw un yn siarad am addysg yn y Siambr hon, mae'n ymwneud â newid pethau, addasu pethau; fod yn rhaid gwneud pethau'n well. Pam eich bod yn sydyn yn awr, ar ôl 50 mlynedd o system gyfun, yn dihuno i'r ffaith fod cymwysterau galwedigaethol ac academaidd yn ddau beth gwahanol, a bod yna wahanol ddisgyblion sy'n rhaid eu defnyddio o ran y ddau allu academaidd gwahanol hynny?