In favour 26, three abstentions, 23 against, and therefore the motion is agreed.

O blaid 26, tri yn ymatal, 23 yn erbyn, ac felly mae'r cynnig yna wedi cael ei gymeradwyo.

The Minister of State in the Welsh Office, David T.C. Davies, again last week defended the cancellation of the electrification of the south Wales main line to Swansea, by arguing that it would not have produced any benefits to passengers. Now, decarbonisation, quite apart from its positive environmental impact, would have had the pretty substantial benefit to passengers of not poisoning them. Though rail infrastructure is not devolved, with the exception of the core Valleys lines, air quality is. So, to what extent can the Welsh Government compel the UK Government to reverse its electrification u-turn and stop treating Wales as the fag end of Britain's railways?

Amddiffynnodd y Gweinidog Gwladol yn y Swyddfa Gymreig, David T.C. Davies, unwaith eto yr wythnos diwethaf y penderfyniad y ganslo trydaneiddio prif reilffordd de Cymru i Abertawe, gan ddadlau na fyddai wedi arwain at unrhyw fanteision i deithwyr. Nawr, byddai datgarboneiddio, ar wahân i'w effaith amgylcheddol gadarnhaol, wedi cael y fantais eithaf sylweddol i deithwyr o beidio â'u gwenwyno. Er nad yw seilwaith rheilffyrdd wedi ei ddatganoli, ac eithrio rheilffyrdd craidd y Cymoedd, mae ansawdd aer. Felly, i ba raddau y gall Llywodraeth Cymru gymell Llywodraeth y DU i wyrdroi ei thro pedol ar drydaneiddio a rhoi'r gorau i drin Cymru fel stwmp sigarét rheilffyrdd Prydain?

The UK Government pushing forward with its plans for a radically changed immigration system during this pandemic seems reckless, as was their decision to reject the Migration Advisory Committee's recommendation for a Wales-only shortage occupation list, which would go some way to reduce the adverse impact of the UK Government's new immigration policies on Wales.

Mae i Lywodraeth y DU fwrw ymlaen â'i chynlluniau ar gyfer system fewnfudo sydd wedi newid yn radical yn ystod y pandemig hwn yn ymddangos yn fyrbwyll, fel roedd eu penderfyniad i wrthod argymhelliad y Pwyllgor Cynghori ar Ymfudo ar gyfer rhestr o alwedigaethau lle ceir prinder i Gymru'n unig, a fyddai'n gwneud rhywfaint i leihau effaith andwyol polisïau mewnfudo newydd Llywodraeth y DU ar Gymru.

Yes. Recruitment and retention is a priority for the Welsh Government and the national health service. Health boards and trusts are leading on initiatives to improve retention, such as return to practice and improving staff well-being. The Welsh Government has also put in place a range of measures to increase the supply of healthcare professionals.

Gwnaf. Mae recriwtio a chadw staff yn flaenoriaeth i Lywodraeth Cymru a'r gwasanaeth iechyd gwladol. Mae byrddau ac ymddiriedolaethau iechyd yn arwain mentrau i wella lefelau cadw staff, megis dychwelyd i weithio a gwella lles staff. Hefyd, mae Llywodraeth Cymru wedi rhoi amrywiaeth o fesurau ar waith i gynyddu'r cyflenwad o weithwyr gofal iechyd proffesiynol.

The next question is on Brexit, Chair. I don't know whether we're going to be able to get to get answers within a couple of minutes, but we have to address this as it is another risk, namely the trade deal that has been struck. How do you think this will affect the organisations that you represent in terms of the services that they provide? Have you had time to do any detailed work on modelling the impact on your budgets, in the middle of a pandemic?

Mae'r cwestiwn nesaf gen i ynglŷn â Brexit, Gadeirydd. Dwi ddim yn gwybod os ydyn ni'n mynd i fedru cael atebion o fewn ychydig funudau ar hwn, ond mae'n rhaid i ni gyfarch hwn, wrth gwrs, sef y risg arall, sef y cytundeb masnach. Sut ydych chi'n meddwl fydd hwn yn effeithio ar y sefydliadau rydych chi'n eu cynrychioli o ran y gwasanaethau maen nhw'n eu darparu? Ydych chi wedi gallu cael amser i wneud y gwaith manwl o fodelu effaith hyn ar eich cyllidebau chi, yng nghanol pandemig?