Cabinet Secretary, I'm familiar with 'buddleia towers' as well and I can't say that I'm over-impressed by Swansea council's intervention there. But the city deal is better news for Swansea. Perhaps regrettably, it doesn't address traditional infrastructure or metros, focusing instead on digital highways as drivers for innovation and regeneration. As a result, I'm wondering whether it might not be for Welsh Government, at a strategic level, to kick start an examination of how to improve Swansea's air quality, examining it within a regional transport plan compatible with the aims of the city deal. Would the Welsh Government look at this so that ideas like monorails and trams and electric taxis and LPG buses don't disappear from your line of sight just because no-one can agree whether it's the transport portfolio, the regeneration portfolio or the communities portfolio that takes responsibility for this?

Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rwy'n gyfarwydd â 'buddleia towers' hefyd ac ni allaf ddweud bod ymyrraeth cyngor Abertawe yn y fan honno wedi creu argraff hynod o fawr arnaf. Ond mae'r fargen ddinesig yn newyddion gwell i Abertawe. Yn anffodus efallai, nid yw'n mynd i'r afael â'r seilwaith traddodiadol neu fetro, gan ganolbwyntio yn hytrach ar briffyrdd digidol yn sbardun i arloesi ac adfywio. O ganlyniad, tybed a allai Llywodraeth Cymru, ar lefel strategol, fynd ati i archwilio sut i wella ansawdd aer Abertawe, gan ei archwilio o fewn cynllun trafnidiaeth rhanbarthol sy'n gydnaws ag amcanion y fargen ddinesig. A fyddai Llywodraeth Cymru yn edrych ar hyn fel nad yw syniadau fel trenau un gledren a thramiau a thacsis trydan a bysiau LPG yn diflannu o'ch golwg yn syml am nad oes neb yn gallu cytuno ai'r portffolio trafnidiaeth, y portffolio adfywio neu'r portffolio cymunedau sydd â'r cyfrifoldeb am hyn?

Diolch. On 27 January, Welsh Government announced a further £6.5 million funding to support local authorities to respond to severe weather events. This includes support for households who suffered flooding in their homes or were evacuated, with payments of up to £1,000 administered by local authorities.

Diolch. Ar 27 Ionawr, cyhoeddodd Llywodraeth Cymru gyllid pellach o £6.5 miliwn i gynorthwyo awdurdodau lleol i ymateb i ddigwyddiadau tywydd garw. Mae hyn yn cynnwys cymorth i aelwydydd sydd wedi dioddef llifogydd yn eu cartrefi neu sydd wedi gorfod gadael eu cartrefi, gyda thaliadau o hyd at £1,000 wedi'u gweinyddu gan awdurdodau lleol.

Okay, great. I have a specific question for the Swansea Law Clinic. You've already mentioned, in answering the previous question, the principles of computational law. So, can you explain what computational law principles could be used to improve the accessibility of law in Wales?

Ocê, grêt. Mae gen i gwestiwn penodol i Glinig Cyfraith Abertawe. Rŷch chi wedi sôn eisoes, wrth basio, gyda'r cwestiwn blaenorol, ynglŷn ag egwyddorion cyfraith gyfrifiadurol. Felly, allwch chi esbonio pa egwyddorion cyfraith gyfrifiadurol y gellid eu defnyddio i wella hygyrchedd y gyfraith yng Nghymru?

Just one further question from me: before the review, you said that there was a need to safeguard the plurality of funding, but what I'm hearing today is that you're quite content that it is coming through one stream, which is the licence fee. Is that a change of opinion?

Jest un cwestiwn gennyf: cyn yr adolygiad, roeddech chi wedi dweud bod angen diogelu lluosogrwydd y cyllid, ond, o beth rydw i'n clywed heddiw, rydych chi'n weddol hapus ei fod e'n dod trwy un ffrwd, sef y drwydded. A ydy hynny yn newid barn, neu ydy hynny - ?

Lee Waters: 'You don't need to be a hero, or a green god, to cycle. Give it a try. For short journeys, it's often the quickest and most convenient way to get around.'

Lee Waters: 'Nid oes angen i chi fod yn arwr, neu'n dduw gwyrdd, i feicio. Rhowch gynnig arni. Ar gyfer teithiau byr, dyna'r ffordd gyflymaf a mwyaf cyfleus yn aml o symud o gwmpas.'