Ond mae yna bethau systemig sy'n gallu cael eu rhoi yn eu lle, wrth gwrs, i sicrhau bod y cyfathrebu rhwng y gwahanol haenau mor glir ag y gallai fo fod. Rydw i'n derbyn yn llwyr fod perthynas rhwng pobl yn rhan ohono fo, ond mae pobl yn gorfod gweithredu o fewn systemau sy'n gwneud y berthynas yna, neu'n galluogi'r berthynas yna i weithio yn fwy llyfn.

But there are systemic things that can be put in place to ensure that that communication between those different layers is as clear as is could be. I accept that the relationship between people is part of that, but people do have to operate within a system that creates that relationship, or allows that relationship to work better.

A wnewch chi ymatal rhag cael sgwrs ar draws y Siambr, oherwydd nid yw'n deg i'r rheini nad ydynt yn y Siambr? Felly, mae hynny'n iawn. A gaf fi alw yn awr ar Angela Burns i ymateb i'r ddadl? Angela.

Can you not have a conversation across the Chamber, because it's not fair to those who are not in the Chamber, to have that? So, that's fine. Can I now call on Angela Burns to reply to the debate? Angela.

Diolch i'r Aelod am ei chwestiwn. Mae'r Aelod yn iawn, ddoe fe gyflwynoch welliant ar berthnasoedd iach, ac ymatebais yn y ddadl ddoe ynglŷn â'r rheswm pam nad oeddem yn ei gefnogi bryd hynny - am fod gennym weithgor y mae Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros addysg wedi'i sefydlu; rydym am ddysgu gan y gweithgor hwnnw. Ond rydych yn gwthio yn erbyn drws agored yma; mae'n ymwneud â'r ffordd yr ydym yn gwneud hyn ac yn ei gyflwyno. Rwy'n cytuno â'r Aelod o ran sut y dylai gael ei wneud, mae'n ymwneud â pha bryd y gwnawn hynny mewn modd priodol drwy'r cwricwlwm, a daw hynny'n gliriach gyda datganiadau Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet yn fuan.

I thank the Member for her question. Yesterday, the Member is right, you tabled an amendment in regard to healthy relationships, and I did respond to you in that debate yesterday on the reason why we weren't supporting it then - because we have a working group that the Cabinet Secretary for Education has set up; we want to learn from that. But you're pushing at an open door here; it's about the way we do this and introduction of it. I agree with the Member in terms of how it should be done, it's just when we do that in the appropriate manner through the curriculum, and that will become clearer with the Cabinet Secretary's statements shortly.

Gwnaf. Mae'r ddeddfwriaeth bresennol yn caniatáu profi cerbydau awtonomaidd ledled y DU. Rydym yn cydnabod potensial cerbydau awtonomaidd o ran gwella diogelwch ar y ffyrdd ledled y wlad ac rydym yn cadw golwg ar hyn.

Yes. Current legislation permits the testing of autonomous vehicles across the UK. We recognise the potential that autonomous vehicles may have in improving road safety across the country and we're maintaining a watching brief.

Ond ydyn ni'n mynd i gyrraedd y lefel o fuddsoddiad rŷm ni ei angen drwy ryw approach gwirfoddol fel yna, neu ydych chi'n credu bod yn rhaid i ni greu rheolau cryfach, er enghraifft, drwy'r system gynllunio neu rywbeth sydd yn gorfodi bach o'r leverage yna, yn hytrach na jest dibynnu ar gwmni? Achos, dwi jest yn meddwl am gwmnïau yswiriant, er enghraifft, sy'n cael eu cyfeirio atyn nhw. Hynny yw, y pwrs cyhoeddus, yn aml iawn, sy'n buddsoddi mewn mesurau atal llifogydd, ond wrth gwrs, mae hwnna'n creu elw i gwmnïau yswiriant. Oni ddylai fod yna reidrwydd fod y rheini yn cyfrannu i bethau fel yna? Rwy'n gwybod bod Dŵr Cymru yn gwneud tipyn o'r gwaith yma yn barod, ond byddwn i jest yn lico clywed lle ŷch chi'n gweld y cydbwysedd yma rhwng rhyw approach gwirfoddol ac approach mwy rheoleiddiol, efallai.

But are we going to reach the level of investment that's required through a voluntary approach such as that, or do you think we have to create stronger rules, for example, through the planning system or something that brings that leverage in, rather than depending on companies? I'm just thinking of insurance companies, for example, which we've referred to. Quite often, it's the public purse that invests in flood prevention systems, but that creates profits for insurance companies. Shouldn't there be a requirement that they contribute to things such as those? I know that Dŵr Cymru does a lot of this work already, but I would just like to hear where you see this balance between a voluntary approach and a more regulatory approach.