Thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer, and I'm grateful to everybody who took part in the debate this afternoon, with the potential exception of that somewhat bizarre contribution from Darren Millar. Deputy Presiding Officer, it's the role of oppositions to oppose Governments, usually, and to seek as many different parliamentary techniques as possible to frustrate the Government from getting its business. This must be the first occasion that I can ever remember where an opposition has not simply waved through Government business but said they don't want the option of scrutinising Government legislation as well. It is quite a bizarre situation to find ourselves in. I welcome the - . Darren wants to make an intervention.

Diolch yn fawr iawn, Ddirprwy Lywydd, ac rwy'n ddiolchgar i bawb a gymerodd ran yn y ddadl y prynhawn yma, ac eithrio cyfraniad braidd yn rhyfedd Darren Millar o bosibl. Ddirprwy Lywydd, rôl y gwrthbleidiau yw gwrthwynebu Llywodraethau, fel arfer, a defnyddio cynifer o wahanol dechnegau seneddol â phosibl i rwystro'r Llywodraeth rhag cael ei ffordd. Rhaid mai dyma'r tro cyntaf i mi gofio lle mae gwrthblaid nid yn unig wedi rhoi rhwydd hynt i fusnes y Llywodraeth ond wedi dweud hefyd nad ydynt eisiau'r opsiwn o graffu ar ddeddfwriaeth y Llywodraeth ychwaith. Mae'n sefyllfa eithaf rhyfedd i fod ynddi. Rwy'n croesawu'r - . Mae Darren eisiau gwneud ymyriad.

To conclude, Llywydd, I understand that Welsh Government has had to make all sorts of political judgments after looking at evidence. In this case, I just think Welsh Government has got its judgment wrong, and that's why we'll be opposing this amended regulation.

I gloi, Llywydd, rwy'n deall bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gorfod gwneud pob math o arfarniadau gwleidyddol ar ôl edrych ar dystiolaeth. Yn yr achos hwn, rwy'n credu bod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi cael ei farn yn anghywir, a dyna pam y byddwn ni'n gwrthwynebu'r rheoliad diwygiedig hwn.

I personally am supportive of the Member's principles behind this. I have written to Sarah Newton MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Crime, Safeguarding and Vulnerability, to ascertain her views on a campaign for a register of perpetrators. I will consider the issue in light of her response around that. I've also sought some legal advice around the competency of the Assembly as to whether we can create a register or not, but I am exploring all options and I will write to the Member with more details when I receive them.

Yn bersonol, rwy'n cefnogi egwyddorion yr Aelod y sy'n sail i hyn. Rwyf wedi ysgrifennu at Sarah Newton AS, yr Is-Ysgrifennydd Gwladol Seneddol dros Drosedd, Diogelu a Bregusrwydd, er mwyn cael ei barn ar ymgyrch dros gofrestr troseddwyr. Byddaf yn ystyried y mater yng ngoleuni ei hymateb i hynny. Rwyf hefyd wedi gofyn am gyngor cyfreithiol parthed cymhwysedd y Cynulliad i greu cofrestr neu fel arall, ond rwy'n edrych ar yr holl opsiynau a byddaf yn ysgrifennu at yr Aelod gyda mwy o fanylion pan fyddaf yn eu cael.

Thank you for that answer, First Minister. The chief executive of S4C, giving evidence to the Culture, Welsh Language and Communications Committee last week, stated that 57 per cent of its programmes had been shown before compared to a target of 20 per cent when S4C was launched in 1982. Funding from the BBC licence fee for S4C will remain at £74.5 million a year until 2022, and S4C has also received £7 million from the UK Government. So, what actions can the Welsh Government take to underscore the importance of original, universal programming, when programmes such as the successful, bilingual 'Hinterland' are universally applauded and when my constituents are concerned at the lack of representation of English language or bilingual Welsh lives across the public sector network?

Diolch i chi am yr ateb yna, Brif Weinidog. Dywedodd prif weithredwr S4C, wrth roi tystiolaeth i'r Pwyllgor Diwylliant, y Gymraeg a Chyfathrebu yr wythnos diwethaf, bod 57 y cant o'u rhaglenni wedi cael eu dangos o'r blaen o'i gymharu â tharged o 20 y cant pan lansiwyd S4C ym 1982. Bydd cyllid o ffi trwydded y BBC ar gyfer S4C yn parhau i fod yn £74.5 miliwn y flwyddyn tan 2022, ac mae S4C hefyd wedi derbyn £7 miliwn gan Lywodraeth y DU. Felly, pa gamau all Llywodraeth Cymru eu cymryd i danlinellu pwysigrwydd rhaglenni gwreiddiol, cyffredinol, pan fo rhaglenni fel rhaglen ddwyieithog lwyddiannus 'Y Gwyll' yn cael eu canmol gan bawb a phan fo fy etholwyr yn pryderu am ddiffyg cynrychiolaeth bywydau Cymreig Saesneg eu hiaith neu ddwyieithog ar draws y rhwydwaith sector cyhoeddus?