Cyn i ni ddechrau, dylai Aelodau fod wedi cael gwybod gan eu rheolwyr busnes o'm bwriad i fod yn fwy llym o hyn ymlaen wrth sicrhau bod Aelodau'n gofyn cwestiynau byr a chryno. Roedd y Pwyllgor Busnes yn cytuno mai dyma'r ffordd orau o sicrhau craffu effeithiol gan y Cynulliad, a byddaf yn galw i drefn unrhyw Aelod sy'n amddifadu eraill o'r cyfle i graffu drwy beidio dod ar eu hunion i gwestiwn.

Before we begin, Members should have been informed by their business managers of my intention to be stricter from now on in ensuring that Members ask short, succinct questions. The Business Committee agreed that this is the best way of ensuring effective scrutiny, and I will call to order any Member who deprives others of the opportunity to scrutinise by not coming quickly to a question.

Wel, diolch yn fawr eto - diolch i'r tri ohonoch chi am wneud yr amser i ymuno â ni. Gwnaf i droi'n syth wedyn at John Griffiths am y set gyntaf o gwestiynau. John.

Well, thank you once again, and thank you for making the time to join us this morning. I will turn immediately now to John Griffiths for the first set of questions. John.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. A gaf innau groesawu'r Gweinidog i'w swydd newydd? Eisiau edrych yn gyntaf ydw i ar barch cydradd, parity of esteem. Rydych chi'n mynd i ddweud wrthyf fi ei bod hi'n bwysig iawn fod yna parity of esteem rhwng iechyd corfforol ac iechyd meddwl, ond sut ydych chi'n gallu dangos i fi o brofiad y cyfnod COVID fod hynny yn cael ei adlewyrchu yn y ffordd y mae'r Llywodraeth wedi bwrw ati efo'i hymateb i'r pandemig?

Thank you very much. May I welcome the Minister to her new post? I want to look first of all at parity of esteem. Now, you're going to tell me that it's very important that there is parity of esteem between physical and mental health, but how can you demonstrate to me from the experience of this COVID pandemic that that is being reflected in the way the Government has responded to this pandemic?

Diolch i chi, Nick Ramsay. Roedd y Gweinidog iechyd yma yn gwrando ar yr hyn oedd gennych i'w ddweud, a byddai'n fwy na pharod i ysgrifennu at bob Aelod i roi'r wybodaeth ddiweddaraf am gamau gweithredu Llywodraeth Cymru yn y maes penodol hwn.

Thank you, Nick Ramsay. The health Minister was here listening to what you had to say, and he would be happy to write to all Members providing an update on Welsh Government action in this particular area.

A yw'r Cwnsler Cyffredinol yn cydnabod bod dyfarniad y Goruchaf Lys wedi mynd yn groes i'r safbwynt blaenorol, fel y'i cynigiwyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru, ac yn wir, y Prif Weinidog? Fe'i cofiaf yn dweud wrthym yn y Siambr ynglŷn â phwysigrwydd pleidleisio dros y cynnig cydsyniad deddfwriaethol ar Fil Cymru, gan y byddai hynny'n rhwymo Sewel mewn statud, ac fel yr Alban, byddem yn elwa o gael y sail statudol honno o ran confensiwn Sewel. Onid y gwirionedd yw bod y Goruchaf Lys wedi dangos bod y safbwynt cyfreithiol hwnnw'n gamsyniad llwyr, ac nad oes mwy o rym i'r confensiwn hwnnw yn awr ei fod wedi'i rwymo mewn statud nag a oedd iddo o'r blaen?

Does the Counsel General recognise that that Supreme Court judgment cut across the previous position, as put forward by the Welsh Government and, indeed, the First Minister? I recall him in this Chamber telling us of the importance to vote for the LCM on the Wales Bill, because it would put Sewel into statute and, as in Scotland, we would benefit from having that statutory underpinning of the Sewel convention. Isn't the reality that the Supreme Court showed that legal position to be entirely misconceived and that the convention has no more weight now that it's in statue than it did before?