Fel mae'n digwydd, Simon Thomas.

As it happens, Simon Thomas.

Diolch, Sioned Williams, am godi'r mater pwysig hwn. Prynhawn da, Prif Weinidog. Yn ystod anterth y pandemig, gwelsom gyfyngiadau enfawr yn cael eu gosod ar famau newydd a'u teuluoedd, nad oedden nhw'n cael ymweld â nhw yn yr ysbyty. Mae'r elusen a'r grŵp ymgyrchu Birthrights wedi monitro'r effaith ar draws y DU i fynegi'r heriau y mae llawer wedi eu hwynebu. Mae'n debyg eu bod nhw wedi ysgrifennu at y Gweinidog iechyd yn gofyn am newid, gan ddweud bod gan Gymru 'rai o'r trefniadau ymweld mwyaf cyfyngol mewn gwasanaethau mamolaeth yn y DU.' A yw'r Prif Weinidog yn credu y dylid ystyried yr effaith ar deuluoedd ar adeg mor bwysig yng nghyd-destun hawliau dynol, ac a gafodd yr hawliau hynny eu parchu? Diolch.

Thank you, Sioned Williams, for raising this important issue. Good afternoon, First Minister. During the height of the pandemic, we saw huge restrictions placed on new mums and their families, who were not allowed to visit them in hospital. The charity and campaign group Birthrights has monitored the impact across the UK to articulate the challenges that many have faced. Apparently, they wrote to the health Minister asking for change, saying Wales has 'some of the most restrictive visiting arrangements in maternity services in the UK.' Does the First Minister believe that the impact on families at such an important time should be considered in the context of human rights, and whether those rights were respected? Thank you.

Diolch am eich ateb, Weinidog. Yn eich datganiad y bore yma, yn amlwg, fe dynnoch chi sylw at yr hyn a fydd yn hanfodol ar gyfer cyflawni'r rhaglen frechu, pa frechlyn bynnag a fydd - sef y staff a'r unigolion sy'n gyfrifol am gyflawni'r gwaith ar lawr gwlad. Fe ddywedoch chi fod ymarferion hyfforddi wedi'u cynnal gyda staff amrywiol ledled Cymru. A allwch roi sicrwydd inni fod yr ymarferion hynny wedi ystyried y gwahaniaethau amrywiol rhwng y brechlynnau? Beth yw'r adborth cychwynnol ynghylch maint y gweithlu a allai fod yn ofynnol i gyflwyno rhaglen frechu genedlaethol yn ystod yr wythnosau a'r misoedd nesaf?

Thank you, Minister, for that answer. In your statement his morning, obviously you highlighted what will be critical to delivery of the vaccine programme, whichever vaccine it's going to be - which will be the staff and the individuals charged with undertaking the work on the ground. You said training exercises have been undertaken with various staff across Wales. Can you assure us that those exercises have taken account of the various differences between the vaccines? What is the initial feedback over the total workforce that might be required to do a national vaccination programme in the coming weeks and months ahead?

Rwy'n credu fy mod, fel fy nghyd-Aelod, Darren Millar, yn profi déjà vu, oherwydd cawsom yr union ddadl hon ychydig wythnosau cyn toriad y Nadolig. Gwn fod gan Blaid Cymru gytundeb cydweithio â Llywodraeth Cymru, ond nid oeddwn yn gwybod ei fod yn golygu ailadrodd dadleuon anfynych y Llywodraeth. Yn amlwg, nid oes gan Blaid Cymru na'u pypedfeistri unrhyw syniadau newydd. Mae ein gwasanaethau cyhoeddus ar eu gliniau, ac yn hytrach na thrafod ffyrdd o ddatrys yr argyfwng, byddai'n well gan Blaid Cymru, unwaith eto, drafod dadleuon cyfansoddiadol neu etholiadol. Mae'n ymddangos mai dulliau adnabod pleidleiswyr yw eu bwgan newydd, ymgais arall i ledaenu ofn, ansicrwydd ac amheuaeth. Lledaenu ofn na fydd pobl yn gallu pleidleisio, lledaenu ansicrwydd ynghylch dilysrwydd etholiadau yn y dyfodol, lledaenu amheuaeth ynglŷn â'r angen am newidiadau o'r fath. Mae'r rhain i gyd yn ddadleuon cyfeiliornus, ac mae dulliau adnabod pleidleiswyr yno i atal pleidleiswyr twyllodrus, nid rhai cyfreithlon. Mae hyn -

I think I'm a bit like my colleague Darren Millar in experiencing symptoms of déjà vu, because we had this exact debate just a few weeks before the Christmas recess. I know Plaid have a co-operation agreement with the Welsh Government, but I didn't know it meant regurgitating the Government's infrequent debates. Clearly, Plaid and their puppet masters are fresh out of ideas. Our public services are on their knees, and rather than debate ways to solve the crisis, Plaid would, once again, rather debate constitutional or electoral arguments. It seems that voter ID is their new straw man, yet another attempt to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt. Spreading fear that people won't be able to vote, spreading uncertainty about the veracity of future elections, spreading doubt about the need for such changes. These are all spurious arguments, and voter ID is there to prevent fraudulent voters, not legitimate ones. This -

Felly, cyfyngiadau'r dewis. Felly efallai bod pobl yn dewis drosom ni beth dŷn ni'n ei weld yn hytrach na'n bod ni - . Er enghraifft, os ydyn ni eisiau gweld mwy o gelfyddydau, mae hwnna ar hyn o bryd wedi cael ei 'squeeze-o' fel ein bod ni ddim yn cael -

So, there are restrictions on choice. Therefore, people may be choosing for us what we see, rather than - . For example, if we want to see more of the arts, that is currently being squeezed so that we don't have -