I've only just started, hang on a minute. [ Laughter.] For goodness' sake, just a minute. The current policy - again, not my words - according to some of your colleagues in Westminster, dishonours the history, the reputation and the generous instincts of this country. Only those with family in the UK are being issued with visas and the scheme for businesses and individuals to sponsor refugees isn't even yet set up. In contrast, the EU has waived all visa restrictions for three years. I'll take your intervention.

Newydd ddechrau ydw i, arhoswch funud. [ Chwerthin.] Er mwyn popeth, dim ond munud. Mae'r polisi presennol - unwaith eto, nid fy ngeiriau i - yn ôl rhai o'ch cyd-bleidwyr yn San Steffan, yn dwyn gwarth ar hanes, enw da a greddfau hael y wlad hon. Dim ond y rheini sydd â theulu yn y DU sy'n cael fisâu ac nid yw'r cynllun i fusnesau ac unigolion noddi ffoaduriaid wedi'i sefydlu eto hyd yn oed. Mewn cyferbyniad, mae'r UE wedi hepgor pob cyfyngiad fisa am dair blynedd. Fe dderbyniaf eich ymyriad.

I'm grateful to the Cabinet Secretary for placing that on the record. Following on from the question from Russell George, the Welsh Government, in response to the feasibility study in 2015 on the development bank, said that its preferred approach was one that specifically prescribed a management and organisational structure different to that currently managed by Finance Wales, i.e. not Finance Wales. And yet, speaking at the Cardiff Breakfast Club last week, Giles Thorley, the CEO of Finance Wales, said, 'Let me let you into a secret; in almost every definition, Finance Wales is already a development bank.' Since that directly contradicts his own Government's report and his own Government's policy, what confidence can we have, in asking Finance Wales to draw up a business plan for a development bank that was meant to replace it, that this isn't just a very elaborate and expensive rebranding exercise?

Rwy'n ddiolchgar i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am gofnodi hynny. I ddilyn y cwestiwn gan Russell George, dywedodd Llywodraeth Cymru, mewn ymateb i'r astudiaeth ddichonoldeb ar y banc datblygu yn 2015, mai ei hoff ddull o weithredu oedd un sy'n pennu'n benodol strwythur trefniadol a rheolaethol gwahanol i'r un sy'n cael ei reoli gan Cyllid Cymru ar hyn o bryd, h.y. nid Cyllid Cymru. Ac eto, wrth siarad yng Nghlwb Brecwast Caerdydd yr wythnos diwethaf, dywedodd Giles Thorley, Prif Swyddog Gweithredol Cyllid Cymru, Gadewch i mi rannu cyfrinach â chi; yn ôl pob diffiniad bron, mae Cyllid Cymru eisoes yn fanc datblygu. Gan fod hynny'n gwrthddweud adroddiad ei Lywodraeth ei hun a pholisi ei Lywodraeth ei hun yn uniongyrchol, pa hyder y gallwn ei gael, wrth ofyn i Cyllid Cymru lunio cynllun busnes ar gyfer banc datblygu y bwriadwyd iddo ei ddisodli, nad ymarfer ailfrandio drud a thrafferthus iawn yn unig yw hwn?

Diolch, Llywydd. First Minister, will you now take the opportunity today to publicly apologise to those farmers whose confidential details were released last year by the Welsh Government to animal rights activist groups?

Diolch, Llywydd. Prif Weinidog, a wnewch chi nawr achub ar y cyfle heddiw i ymddiheuro'n gyhoeddus i'r ffermwyr hynny y cyhoeddwyd eu manylion cyfrinachol y llynedd gan Lywodraeth Cymru i grwpiau actifyddion hawliau anifeiliaid?