I think I've answered the question in a way. I think the intention of that fund was for people to bid for funding to help with this, but is it sufficient? No, I don't think it is, to be completely honest. I think there's so much work to be done, I would say 'no'. I think it's a real back-to-basics situation - where we spend that money. A million isn't going to go very far.

Wel, dwi'n meddwl fy mod i wedi ateb y cwestiwn mewn ffordd yn barod. Dwi'n meddwl mai bwriad y fund yna oedd i bobl fidio am arian i fedru helpu efo hyn, ond ydy o'n ddigon? Nac ydy, dwi ddim yn meddwl ei fod o, i fod yn hollol onest. Mae yna gymaint o waith i'w wneud y buaswn i'n dweud 'na'. Mae o'n rhywbeth back to basics go iawn - lle rydyn ni'n gwario'r arian. Dydy miliwn ddim yn mynd i fynd yn bell iawn o gwbl.

May I thank the Cabinet Secretary for the clarity that she has provided on this? I did raise the need for more clarity in section 65, in terms of charging for independent advocacy services during Stage 2, and the Minister agreed at that point to look again at the wording. In light of the Cabinet Secretary's comments, I am happy not to move amendments 59 and 60 when we get to that point.

A gaf i ddiolch i'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet am yr eglurder mae hi wedi ei roi ar hyn? Mi wnes i godi'r angen am well eglurder yn adran 65 ar y mater o dalu am wasanaethau eirioli annibynnol yn ystod Cyfnod 2, ac fe gytunodd y Gweinidog ar y pryd i edrych eto ar y geiriad. Yn sgil sylwadau'r Ysgrifennydd Cabinet, rydw i'n ddigon hapus i beidio â chynnig gwelliannau 59 a 60 pan ddown ni atyn nhw.

As I just said, we've invested over £20 million in preventing and relieving homelessness this year alone. The funding supports a range of statutory and non-statutory services to help those who do not have a secure place to live. The strategic policy statement was published on 8 October and sets out the policy framework and principles this Government will take to tackle and prevent homelessness. Our strategy is very much focused around a person-centred, trauma-informed response that involves all public services in meeting the needs of those who actually find themselves at risk of being or actually homeless.

Fel y dywedais, rydym wedi buddsoddi dros £20 miliwn eleni yn unig i atal a lleddfu digartrefedd. Mae'r cyllid yn cefnogi ystod o wasanaethau statudol ac anstatudol i helpu pobl nad oes ganddynt le diogel i fyw. Cyhoeddwyd y datganiad polisi strategol ar 8 Hydref ac mae'n nodi'r fframwaith polisi a'r egwyddorion y bydd y Llywodraeth hon yn eu mabwysiadu er mwyn atal a mynd i'r afael â digartrefedd. Mae ein strategaeth yn canolbwyntio'n helaeth ar ymateb sy'n canolbwyntio ar yr unigolyn, wedi'i lywio gan drawma, sy'n cynnwys yr holl wasanaethau cyhoeddus er mwyn diwallu anghenion y rheini sydd mewn perygl o fynd yn ddigartref neu sy'n ddigartref.

I do associate myself with the comments of Alun Davies and Heledd Fychan as well. And I'll keep saying, until the Welsh Conservatives might take the message back to their colleagues in Parliament, that they should reinstate the £20 universal credit cut. It is shameful - it is absolutely shameful that they are not doing that, and I really hope that they'll just pause and consider - [ Interruption.]

Rwy'n cysylltu fy hun â sylwadau Alun Davies a Heledd Fychan. Ac rwy'n parhau i ddweud, hyd nes bydd y Ceidwadwyr Cymreig yn cyfleu'r neges i'w cyd-Aelodau yn Senedd y Deyrnas Unedig, y dylent adfer y toriad o £20 i'r credyd cynhwysol. Mae'n gywilyddus - mae'n gwbl gywilyddus nad ydynt yn gwneud hynny, ac rwy'n mawr obeithio y byddant yn oedi ac yn ystyried - [ Torri ar draws.]