I thank you for that answer, and this is really, really good news, because we all know that, by the age of 11, 40 per cent of children are obese in Wales, or they're overweight, and that is a very, very unhealthy state for children to arrive at in such an early age. You did mention the £1 million funding from Welsh Government and Innovate UK, and that it will be open to companies and research organisations, to help them find that innovation in producing this food. But, I will ask, leader of the house, how do food innovators in Wales apply for that funding, and what is the criteria that will be needed to meet and qualify for that funding?

Diolch am eich ateb, ac mae hyn yn newyddion da iawn, gan y gwyddom fod 40 y cant o blant Cymru yn ordew neu'n rhy drwm erbyn iddynt gyrraedd 11 oed, ac mae hwnnw'n gyflwr afiach iawn i blant fod ynddo ar oedran mor ifanc. Fe sonioch am yr £1 miliwn o gyllid gan Lywodraeth Cymru ac Innovate UK, ac y bydd ar gael i gwmnïau a sefydliadau ymchwil, i'w helpu i ddod o hyd i arloesedd o'r fath wrth gynhyrchu'r bwyd hwn. Ond a gaf fi ofyn, arweinydd y tŷ, sut y bydd arloeswyr bwyd yng Nghymru yn gwneud cais am yr arian hwnnw, a beth yw'r meini prawf y bydd angen eu bodloni er mwyn bod yn gymwys i gael yr arian hwnnw?

I think that's a fair amount.

Rwy'n credu bod hynny'n swm teg.

Leader of the house, in February, Welsh Ministers stated they were considering making a screening direction to Biomass UK No.2 Limited, developing the Barry incinerator, under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2017, citing that the characteristics of the development fall within the EIA regulations. I'm curious what the delay is in progressing the screening. Can the leader of the house find out from the environment Minister whether she would disclose any correspondence with the developer on this matter since February? Secondly, can I have a statement following the National Audit Office report, which concluded that the Department for Work and Pensions has not achieved value for money on its early implementation of universal credit? Last week, two disabled men won their cases, having lost £175 as a result of universal credit - a week, that is. This is of great concern, of course, because universal credit is now being rolled out in Wales.

Arweinydd y tŷ, ym mis Chwefror, dywedodd Gweinidogion Cymru eu bod yn ystyried gwneud cyfarwyddyd sgrinio i Biomas UK No.2 Limited, sy'n datblygu llosgydd y Barri, o dan Reoliadau Cynllunio Gwlad a Thref (Asesu Effeithiau Amgylcheddol) (Cymru) 2017, gan nodi bod nodweddion y datblygiad wedi'u cynnwys y Rheoliadau EIA. Mae gennyf ddiddordeb i wybod beth yw'r oedi wrth fwrw ymlaen â'r sgrinio. A wnaiff arweinydd y tŷ gael gwybod gan Weinidog yr Amgylchedd a pa un a wnaiff hi rannu unrhyw ohebiaeth â'r datblygwr ar y mater hwn ers mis Chwefror? Yn ail, a gaf i ddatganiad yn dilyn adroddiad y Swyddfa Archwilio Genedlaethol, a ddaeth i'r casgliad nad yw'r Adran Gwaith a Phensiynau wedi cyflawni gwerth am arian ar ei weithrediad cynnar o gredyd cynhwysol? Yr wythnos diwethaf, enillodd dau ddyn anabl eu hachosion, ar ôl colli £175 o ganlyniad i'r credyd cynhwysol - yr wythnos, hynny yw. Mae hyn yn peri cryn bryder, wrth gwrs, oherwydd bod credyd cynhwysol yn cael ei gyflwyno yng Nghymru erbyn hyn.

Amendment 80 in the name of Laura Anne Jones. Is it moved?

Gwelliant 80 yn enw Laura Anne Jones. Ydy e'n cael ei symud?

It's difficult for me to say. I haven't worked in a practice for some three months now, but when I left, it definitely wasn't. I would say that we were back to around 60 per cent, perhaps, by that point. But, Fiona, perhaps, could tell you more because she's still in that same practice.

Mae'n anodd i fi ddweud erbyn hyn. Dydw i ddim wedi gweithio mewn practis ers rhyw dri mis rŵan. Ond pan roeddwn i'n gadael, doedd o bendant ddim. Buaswn i'n dweud roeddem ni yn ôl i 60 y cant, efallai, erbyn hynny. Mae Fiona'n gweithio yn yr un practis ag yr oeddwn i, ond mae hi dal yna rŵan.