But when our representative is appointed to Ofcom, he or she will be most enthusiastic or they won't be appointed.

Ond pan fydd ein cynrychiolydd ni wedi'i benodi ar Ofcom, mi fydd hi neu fo'n frwdfrydig iawn, neu fyddan nhw ddim yn cael y job.

I thank the Cabinet Secretary for that response. I know that the Welsh Government has worked hard to produce these guidelines. However, when I visited Pembrokeshire last week with the cross-party group, a great deal of concern was expressed by the Gypsies and Travellers who attended the meeting about health provision and, in particular, getting access to general practitioners, and the loss, actually, of a dedicated health visitor who used to be employed by the Unity Project, to visit sites specifically. So, it was a general concern about health, so I wondered how far these guidelines were actually effective.

Diolch i Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet am yr ymateb hwnnw. Gwn fod Llywodraeth Cymru wedi gweithio'n galed i gynhyrchu'r canllawiau hyn. Fodd bynnag, pan ymwelais â Sir Benfro yr wythnos diwethaf gyda'r grŵp trawsbleidiol, mynegwyd llawer o bryder gan y Sipsiwn a'r Teithwyr a fynychodd y cyfarfod ynglŷn â darpariaeth iechyd, ac yn benodol, ynglŷn â chael mynediad at feddygon teulu, a cholli ymwelydd iechyd penodedig a arferai gael eu cyflogi gan y Prosiect Undod i ymweld yn benodol â safleoedd. Felly, roedd yn bryder cyffredinol ynglŷn ag iechyd, felly tybed pa mor effeithiol oedd y canllawiau hyn mewn gwirionedd.

I find the Member's comments not surprising given the party that he now resides in. The fact is that working with another party - with Westminster - is something that we do on a regular basis. It's not new to a devolved administration to do that, but it's also not impossible to work with our friends across Europe either, and that's what the Member should think about carefully tomorrow.

Nid yw sylwadau'r Aelod yn syndod o ystyried y blaid y mae'n rhan ohoni'n awr. Y ffaith yw bod gweithio gyda phlaid arall - gyda San Steffan - yn rhywbeth rydym yn ei wneud yn rheolaidd. Nid yw'n beth newydd i weinyddiaeth ddatganoledig wneud hynny, ond nid yw'n amhosibl i ni weithio gyda'n cyfeillion ar draws Ewrop chwaith, a dyna ddylai'r Aelod feddwl amdano'n ofalus yfory.

First Minister, why have you subsequently, then, when we've been questioning you in this Chamber, indicated that you had issues brought to your attention by the individual I named and others, and that you dealt with those issues at that time? Because there are quite clearly two stories running here, and it is difficult for the impartial observer to try and get to the truth of what people want to hear, which is what was actually going on in 2014 and what action was taken by you. So, can you clear up who is telling the truth: Leighton Andrews or yourself?

Prif Weinidog, pam ydych chi felly, wedi hynny, pan yr ydym ni wedi wedi bod yn eich holi chi yn y Siambr hon, wedi dweud y tynnwyd eich sylw at faterion gan yr unigolyn a enwais ac eraill, a'ch bod chi wedi ymdrin â'r materion hynny ar yr adeg honno? Oherwydd mae'n gwbl eglur bod dwy stori ar y gweill yn y fan yma, ac mae'n anodd i'r sylwedydd diduedd geisio cael at wirionedd yr hyn y mae pobl eisiau ei glywed, sef beth oedd yn digwydd mewn gwirionedd yn 2014 a pha gamau a gymerwyd gennych chi. Felly, a allwch chi egluro pwy sy'n dweud y gwir: Leighton Andrews neu chi?