Diolch yn fawr, Llywydd. I ddechrau, fe hoffwn i groesawu'r cyfle i ymateb i'r drafodaeth hon ar gyllideb y Deyrnas Unedig yr wythnos diwethaf. Cyn trafod rhai agweddau penodol o'r gyllideb a'r hyn y mae'n ei olygu i Gymru, rydw i am ddweud gair am y darlun ehangach. Nid ydy polisi cyni San Steffan yn gweithio, fel mae pobl ledled y Siambr wedi cydnabod. Mae'n niweidio economi'r Deyrnas Unedig yn gyfan.

Thank you very much, Llywydd. First of all, I'd like to welcome the opportunity to respond to this debate on the UK budget announced last week. Before turning to some specific aspects of the budget and what it will mean for Wales, I want to say a few words about the bigger picture. The austerity policy of Westminster is not working, as people across the Chamber have recognised. It is damaging the UK economy as a whole.

Diolch, Gadeirydd. Dyw'r system drwyddedu ddim wedi cael ei datganoli eto. Fe ddaw e, mae'n siŵr, mewn amser, ond bydd e'n ddiddorol i ni i gyd wybod beth yw'r problemau ynglŷn â'r system drwyddedu presennol. Mi wnaethoch chi sôn, Guto, yn gynharach ynglŷn â'r gwahaniaeth rhwng canolfannau sy'n cael eu sefydlu fel canolfannau celfyddyd a chanolfannau sy'n cael eu hystyried fel clybiau nos, os caf i ddweud hynny. Fe wnaethoch chi sôn wrthyf i fod eisiau mwy o bobl ynglŷn â diogelwch ac yn y blaen. A allwch chi roi rhai enghreifftiau i ni o beth yw'r pethau ychwanegol mae'n rhaid i chi eu gwneud o'i gymharu ag, er enghraifft, Chapter?

Thank you, Chair. The new licensing system has not been devolved yet. We want to address this issue in time, but it's interesting for us to see what the problems are in terms of the licensing system at present. You mentioned, Guto, earlier the difference between arts centres and centres that are considered to be nightclubs, if I can use that term. You mentioned the fact that you need more security officers and so forth. Could you give us some examples of those additional things that you have to do, compared with, for example, Chapter?

Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet, rwyf wedi derbyn sylwadau gan etholwyr sy'n pryderu bod dysgwyr ag anhwylder ar y sbectrwm awtistig o dan anfantais wrth sefyll yr arholiad TGAU Saesneg oherwydd eu hanawsterau gyda chyfathrebu cymdeithasol a rhyngweithio cymdeithasol, sydd, wrth gwrs, yn golygu sefyll yr un prawf â'u cyfoedion niwronodweddiadol, ac mae hynny'n gwneud pethau'n anos o lawer iddynt. Yng ngoleuni'r annhegwch hwn, a allwch ddweud wrthym pa drafodaethau a gafwyd gyda darparwyr arholiadau ynglŷn â'r arholiad TGAU Saesneg, ac a yw'n bosibl i ddysgwyr ag anhwylder ar y sbectrwm awtistig sefyll math gwahanol o arholiad ar gyfer y pwnc hwn, fel nad yw'r dysgwyr hyn o dan anfantais yn y dyfodol?

Cabinet Secretary, I've received representations from constituents who are concerned that learners with autism spectrum disorder are at a disadvantage when taking the GCSE English exam due to their impaired social communication and social interaction, which of course means sitting the same test as their neurotypical peers, and makes it much more difficult for them. In light of this unfairness, can you tell us what discussions have actually taken place with examination providers regarding the GCSE English exam, and whether there is scope for learners with ASD to sit a different type of examination for this subject, so that these learners are not at a disadvantage in the future?