'Our letters currently no longer provide telephone numbers and do direct customers to our online booking system. However, the telephone numbers for customers to contact us on are always provided on our terms and conditions, which are reviewed approximately every 18 months and sent out to all customers.'

Nid yw ein llythyrau'n darparu rhifau ffôn mwyach ac maent yn cyfeirio cwsmeriaid yn uniongyrchol at ein system archebu ar-lein. Fodd bynnag, mae'r rhifau ffôn i gwsmeriaid gysylltu â ni bob amser yn cael eu darparu ar ein telerau a'n hamodau ni, a adolygir bob tua 18 mis a'u hanfon at bob cwsmer.

Thank you. Well, provisions in the Planning (Wales) Act 2015 do enable local planning authorities to bring forward strategic development plans, and I know there are several local authorities looking at that - you've just mentioned a few of them - and it could be an important mechanism at a regional level, but if they don't want to do that, then, certainly, they can just continue with their local development plans.

Diolch. Wel, mae darpariaethau yn Neddf Cynllunio (Cymru) 2015 yn galluogi awdurdodau cynllunio lleol i gyflwyno cynlluniau datblygu strategol, a gwn fod nifer o awdurdodau lleol yn ystyried hynny - rydych newydd grybwyll rhai ohonynt - a gallai fod yn fecanwaith pwysig ar lefel ranbarthol, ond os nad ydynt yn dymuno gwneud hynny, yna yn sicr, gallant barhau â'u cynlluniau datblygu lleol.

'No' is the answer. I don't think they had in mind a scenario where, first of all, the UK Government could be shaken down for £1.67 billion, and, secondly, the UK Government was not able to negotiate with the European Union because of a veto held by a small number of Members of Parliament. I don't think that's at all what people had in mind when they voted last year.

'Na' yw'r ateb. Nid wyf yn credu eu bod wedi rhagweld sefyllfa pryd, yn gyntaf oll, y gellid perswadio Llywodraeth y DU i dalu £1.67 biliwn am gefnogaeth, ac, yn ail, sefyllfa pan na fyddai Llywodraeth y DU yn gallu negodi gyda'r Undeb Ewropeaidd oherwydd feto gan nifer fach o Aelodau Seneddol. Dwi ddim yn credu mai dyna a oedd gan bobl mewn golwg o gwbl, pan wnaethon nhw bleidleisio y llynedd.

Thank you for the question. We are determined to do everything that we can to address the unacceptable inequalities in health outcomes between our least advantaged and our most advantaged communities. Reducing inequality is a central ambition of 'Prosperity for All', and that requires us to work in a more integrated and collaborative way within Government and with our partners, with a continued shift towards prevention.

Diolch i chi am y cwestiwn. Rydym yn benderfynol o wneud popeth yn ein gallu i fynd i'r afael â'r anghydraddoldebau annerbyniol rhwng canlyniadau iechyd ein cymunedau lleiaf breintiedig a'n cymunedau mwyaf breintiedig. Mae lleihau anghydraddoldeb yn uchelgais ganolog yn 'Ffyniant i bawb', ac mae hynny'n ei gwneud hi'n ofynnol inni weithio mewn ffordd fwy integredig a chydweithredol yn y Llywodraeth a chyda'n partneriaid, gan symud yn barhaus tuag at atal.

Yes, because you don't seem to understand basic economics, but there we are -

Ydw, gan nad yw'n ymddangos eich bod yn deall economeg sylfaenol, ond dyna ni -