I would make the point also, in terms of what's important for the standards process, that it's not standardised for the institutions. We've gone through a very laborious process of challenging some standards and, as a result, we've had changes made to some of our standards. So, our standards aren't the same standards as yours. And is that the intention - that users don't know what their rights are, then, in going from one organisation to another organisation?

Buaswn i'n gwneud y pwynt hefyd, o ran beth sydd yn bwysig am y broses safonau, nad yw e'n safonol i'r sefydliadau. Rŷm ni wedi bod trwy broses lafurus iawn gyda herio rhai safonau ac, yn sgil hynny, wedi cael newidiadau wedi'u gwneud i rai o'n safonau ni. Felly, nid yw'n safonau ni'r un peth â'ch safonau chi. Ac ai dyna beth yw pwrpas y peth, sef nad yw defnyddwyr yn gwybod beth yw eu hawliau nhw, wedyn, o fynd o un corff i gorff arall?

A case could arise, of course, that a landlord who wasn't registered with you was found guilty in a court. What would then be the situation, because there'd be no licence there to take away anyway? But, what would happen? Would that person not be allowed a licence in the future, perhaps?

Mi allai achos godi, wrth gwrs, fod landlord sydd ddim wedi'i gofrestru efo chi'n cael ei ffeindio'n euog mewn llys barn. Beth fyddai'r sefyllfa, wedyn, achos ni fyddai trwydded yna i'w thynnu i ffwrdd beth bynnag? Ond, beth fyddai'n digwydd? A fyddai'r person yna ddim yn gymwys i gael trwydded i'r dyfodol, efallai?

If I could just interrupt, I agree with you. I think you're entirely right to say that outcomes are what's important. But Public Health Wales, for example, have told us quite clearly that there has been far too much focus on process at the expense of outcomes, and that there hasn't been sufficient assessment of outcomes and outputs and how successful they've been. That's the evidence we have.

Jest i dorri ar eich traws chi, rydw i'n cytuno efo chi - rydw i'n meddwl eich bod chi'n hollol iawn i ddweud mai'r allbynnau sydd yn bwysig. Ond mae Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru, er enghraifft, wedi dweud wrthym ni o'r blaen bod yna lawer gormod o ffocws wedi bod ar broses ar draul canlyniadau, ac nad oes yna ddigon o fesur wedi bod ar allbynnau a pha mor llwyddiannus maen nhw wedi bod. Dyna'r dystiolaeth sydd gennym ni.

Llywydd, it is like arriving in a parallel universe to receive questions from the party that embraces Tommy Robinson and the creed that he is prepared to advocate, and then asks for other parties to account for themselves. Let me be clear, Llywydd: there is absolutely no place in my party or anywhere else in Wales for prejudice against people of other races or religions. And that does not simply include those that the Member has referred to today, but all those others that, in the past, he has been prepared to attack in the position that he now occupies.

Llywydd, mae fel cyrraedd bydysawd cyfochrog i gael cwestiynau gan y blaid sy'n croesawu Tommy Robinson a'r credo y mae'n barod i'w hyrwyddo, ac yna sy'n gofyn i bleidiau eraill esbonio eu hunain. Gadewch i mi fod yn eglur, Llywydd: does dim lle o gwbl yn fy mhlaid i nac yn unrhyw le arall yng Nghymru ar gyfer rhagfarn yn erbyn pobl o hiliau neu grefyddau eraill. Ac nid yw hynny'n cynnwys y rhai y mae'r Aelod wedi cyfeirio atyn nhw heddiw yn unig, ond at bob un arall y mae ef, yn y gorffennol, wedi bod yn barod i ymosod arnynt yn y swydd y mae ynddi erbyn hyn.

Llywydd, we work closely with the four police forces and our police and crime commissioners in Wales and other partners, including the Welsh Local Government Association and Public Health Wales, to support victims of crime and to reduce the risk of people becoming victims of crime.

Llywydd, rydym ni'n gweithio'n agos gyda'r pedwar heddlu a'n comisiynwyr heddlu a throseddu yng Nghymru a phartneriaid eraill, gan gynnwys Cymdeithas Llywodraeth Leol Cymru ac Iechyd Cyhoeddus Cymru, i gefnogi dioddefwyr troseddau ac i leihau'r risg y gallai pobl ddioddef troseddau.