Wel, na, nid yw hynny'n gywir. Mae arian ychwanegol wedi mynd i mewn i CAMHS. Dioddefodd CAMHS, mewn rhai ffyrdd, oherwydd ei lwyddiant ei hunan ar y cychwyn. Ar ôl iddi ddod yn hysbys bod y gwasanaeth ar gael, roedd hi'n llawer haws i feddygon teulu atgyfeirio i CAMHS, ac, yn wir, mae'n iawn i ddweud bod galw wedi mynd yn eithaf uchel. Gwnaethom gymryd camau wedyn, wrth gwrs, i sicrhau bod y cyllid ar gael er mwyn gallu ateb y galw hwnnw, ac rwy'n sicr yn disgwyl gweld amseroedd aros yn lleihau dros amser, wrth i'r arian lifo drwy'r system.

Well, no, that's not correct. Extra money has gone into CAMHS. CAMHS, in some ways, was the victim of its own success at the beginning. Once it was known that the service was there, GPs were far more able to refer into CAMHS, and, indeed, it's right to say that demand did become quite high. We then took steps, of course, to make sure the funding was available in order to meet that demand, and I fully expect to see waiting times reduce over time, as the money flows through the system.

Rwy'n cydnabod y gwaith rhagorol sydd wedi'i wneud drwy'r rhaglen ôl-osod er mwyn optimeiddio, sydd yn sicr wedi gwella llawer o'n tai cymdeithasol. Rwy'n edrych ymlaen at glywed manylion cynllun sgiliau sero net y flwyddyn nesaf, oherwydd mae hynny'n mynd i fod yn hanfodol wrth alluogi'r diwydiant adeiladu i gynllunio ar gyfer cael y sgiliau sydd eu hangen arnyn nhw i ddatgarboneiddio ein holl gartrefi. Rwy'n gwerthfawrogi bod uchelgais Llywodraeth Cymru yn gorfod addasu oherwydd toriad o £1 biliwn o leiaf yn ei chyllideb y flwyddyn nesaf. Serch hynny, mae sawl ffordd y gellir datblygu achos datgarboneiddio'r sector preifat, yn enwedig pan fo 40 y cant o holl gartrefi Cymru wedi'u perchnogi'n llwyr heb forgais ynghlwm. P'un a yw'n basbortau adeiladu unigol neu gymhellion cyllidol trwy ostyngiad yn nhrethi stamp neu'r dreth gwerth tir, sut allwn ni symbylu pobl sydd â'r adnoddau i fuddsoddi mewn lleihau eu biliau gwresogi a gwneud y peth iawn ar gyfer yr amgylchedd?

I recognise the excellent work that's been done through the optimised retrofit programme, which has certainly improved a lot of our social housing. I look forward to hearing the detail of next year's net-zero skills plan, because that is going to be crucial in enabling the construction industry to plan for having the skills they need to decarbonise all our homes. I appreciate the Welsh Government's ambition is tempered by at least a £1 billion cut in its budget next year. Nevertheless, there are many ways in which the cause of decarbonising the private sector can be advanced, particularly when 40 per cent of all Welsh homes are owned outright with no mortgage attached. Whether it's individual building passports or fiscal incentives through a reduction in stamp duties or land value tax, how can we galvanise people who have the resources to invest in reducing their heating bills and do the right thing by the environment?

Yn sicr, a diolch i'r Aelod am ei gwestiwn, ac am nodi'n gywir fod gennym hanes balch o gefnogi cynlluniau arbed ynni domestig a busnesau yng Nghymru? Efallai fod gan yr Aelod ddiddordeb mewn gwybod bod gennym brosiectau arbed ynni ar raddfa fawr sy'n cydymffurfio â chymorth gwladwriaethol yn cael eu cynllunio a'u cymeradwyo gan Ewrop yn awr ac maent yn cynnig atebion arloesol a allai fod yn bwysig iawn i ddiwydiannau ynni-ddwys, fel dur. Ac wrth i mi ystyried fy ateb i David Melding, byddwn yn dweud hefyd, o ran arbed ynni domestig, byddai hynny hefyd yn ffurfio un o agweddau craidd y strategaeth economaidd newydd a diogelu ffynonellau ynni yn benodol.

Absolutely, and can I thank the Member for his question, and for rightly pointing out that we've got a proud record of supporting domestic and business energy efficiency schemes in Wales? The Member may be interested to know that we have large-scale, state-aid-compliant energy efficiency projects that are now being designed and approved by Europe that offer innovative solutions that could be very important to energy-intensive industries, such as steel. And, as I reflect as well on my answer to David Melding, I would say that, in terms of domestic energy efficiency, that would also form a core aspect of the new economic strategy, and in particular energy security.

Y gwir amdani, wrth gwrs, yw bod ffermwyr, undebau'r ffermwyr a'r diwydiant ffermio yn gyffredinol wedi galw'r swm a neilltuwyd gan Lywodraeth Cymru i roi'r mesurau hyn ar waith yn un cwbl annigonol. Nawr, er bod gennyf gryn dipyn o barch tuag at yr AC dros Gaerffili, nid yw ei reswm dros beidio â phleidleisio yn erbyn y Llywodraeth ddydd Mercher diwethaf yn gwneud unrhyw synnwyr pan ddywed fod dau lygrwr mawr yn ei etholaeth - mae'n datgelu dadleuon y Gweinidog dros gosbi'r diwydiant cyfan. Dylai ymyrraeth fod yn un sydd wedi'i thargedu. Felly, Weinidog, pam yr aethoch yn erbyn holl gyngor y sector amaethyddol a rhoi strategaeth a allai fod mor drychinebus ar waith yn gyffredinol?

The truth is, of course, that the amount set aside by the Welsh Government to implement these measures has been identified by farmers, farmers unions and the whole of the farming industry as totally inadequate. Now, whilst I have great respect for the AM for Caerphilly, his reason for not voting against the Government last Wednesday does not cut ice when he says there are two large polluters in his constituency - he lays bare the Minister's arguments for punishing the whole industry. Intervention should have been targeted. So, Minister, why did you go against all the agricultural sector's advice and implement such a potentially disastrous blanket strategy?

Wel, efallai fod ei blaid ef wedi ymgyrchu ar y sail honno yn y ddau etholiad diwethaf, ond yn sicr ni wnaeth ymgyrchu ar sail cymdeithas agored a chynhwysol yn ystod refferendwm Brexit ei hun.

Well, his party may have campaigned on that basis in the last two elections, but it certainly didn't campaign on the basis of an open and inclusive society during the Brexit referendum itself.