Diolch i'r Aelod. A all grybwyll un achlysur pan fo unrhyw Aelod yma wedi dadlau yn erbyn fframwaith ar gyfer y DU?

I thank the Member. Can he name one occasion when any Member here has argued against a UK framework?

Jest yn ffurfiol i fynd ar ôl y pwynt ynglŷn â'r holl gynlluniau eraill yma - mae'r rhain yn creu'r dryswch rhyfeddaf i bobl, nid ydy pobl yn gwybod amdanyn nhw, ac, i mi, mi fyddai o'n gwneud synnwyr cyffredin i ddod â'r cwbl at ei gilydd fel bod pawb sydd efo plant o oed tair a phedair oed yn gallu cael yr hawl, wedyn, i gael gofal am ddim.

Just to formally pursue the point about all of these other programmes - these create huge confusion for people, people aren't aware of them, and, for me, it would make common sense to bring everything together so that everyone who has children of the ages of three or four does have that right, then, to free childcare.

Grêt, a byddai'n dda inni, efallai, gael nodyn ynglŷn â manylion y contract diwylliannol. Yn sicr, mae'n swnio'n ddiddorol, ond mae diffyg amser o ran sgrwtineiddio'n fwy ar hynny nawr. Ond diolch yn fawr iawn am hynny. Symud ymlaen at gwestiynau felly gan David Melding ar y celfyddydau. Diolch.

Great, and it would be good if we could get a note on the details of the cultural contract. It certainly sounds very interesting, but we don't necessarily have time to scrutinise that further now. But thank you for that. If we can move on to questions from David Melding on the arts. Thank you.

Yn anffodus, mae'r farn honno wedi peri i bobl feddwl bod talu'r dreth gyngor yn opsiynol, ac os nad ydych yn ei dalu, ni fydd dim yn gallu digwydd i chi, felly waeth i chi beidio â'i dalu. Ac mae llawer o bobl wedi bod yn gwneud datganiadau tebyg i hynny ar y cyfryngau cymdeithasol. Felly, a wnaiff y Cwnsler Cyffredinol drafod effaith yr achos llys diweddar mewn perthynas â chyfreithlondeb carcharu pobl am beidio â thalu'r dreth gyngor gyda'i Weinidog cyfatebol yn San Steffan?

Unfortunately, that judgment has been taken by some people to mean that paying council tax is optional, and that if you don't pay it, nothing can be done to you, so you might as well not pay it. And social media has been awash with people making statements like that. So, will the Counsel General discuss the impact of the recent court case regarding the legality of imprisonment for non-payment of council tax with his counterpart at Westminster?

Brif Weinidog, rwy'n sylwi na wnaethoch chi ddweud bod gennych chi ffydd Soniasoch yn faith bod potensial o fewn y prosiect, ond mae ceisiadau rhyddid gwybodaeth gan eich Llywodraeth, yr wyf yn gobeithio eich bod yn ymwybodol ohonynt, gan gyfarwyddwr cyffredinol adran yr economi, James Price, yn dangos yn eglur bod gweision sifil wedi codi pryderon gyda Gweinidogion ynghylch y cynlluniau i Gwmni Datblygu Blaenau'r Cymoedd, sy'n eiddo i Michael Carrick, dalu bron i £1 filiwn mewn ffioedd ymgynghori i Aventa Capital Partners Ltd - sy'n eiddo 100 y cant i Michael Carrick - gan dalu eu hunain i gynghori eu hunain, i bob pwrpas. Nawr, does bosib y gall hynny fod yn iawn, yn enwedig os na fu proses dendro gadarn, ac, yn wir, pan fo'r gweision sifil eu hunain, y cyfarwyddwr cyffredinol, yn cynnig cyngor o'r fath i Weinidogion. Pam y byddai Gweinidogion yn mynd yn groes i'r cyngor hwnnw a chymeradwyo trafodiad o'r fath?

First Minister, I noticed you didn't say you had confidence. You talked at length that there is potential within the project, but freedom of information requests from your Government, which I hope you're aware of, from the director general of the department for the economy, James Price, clearly show that civil servants raised concerns with Ministers over the plans for the Heads of the Valleys Development Company, owned by Michael Carrick, to pay Aventa Capital Partners Ltd - 100 per cent owned by Michael Carrick - almost £1 million in consultancy fees, effectively paying themselves to advise themselves. Now, that clearly cannot be right especially if there hasn't been a robust tendering process, and, indeed, when the civil servants themselves, the director general, is offering such advice to Ministers. Why would Ministers go against that advice and approve such a transaction?