that biological-physical destruction was necessary the type of group destruction Germany Convention States municipal laws the judgements of several international and municipal courts
Two bodies of the United Nations agreed with what restricted provision in defining genocide? A definition of what, by the States, was necessary to preserve and expand genocidal law? Which country's courts were noted by the ECHR for taking a wider stance on provisions of genocide laws? The ECHR found most states to have largely undefined definitions of group destruction, despite what factor? In its preparations, what was the source of other considerations by the ECHR?
In the same judgement the ECHR reviewed the judgements of several international and municipal courts judgements. It noted that International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Court of Justice had agreed with the narrow interpretation, that biological-physical destruction was necessary for an act to qualify as genocide. The ECHR also noted that at the time of its judgement, apart from courts in Germany which had taken a broad view, that there had been few cases of genocide under other Convention States municipal laws and that "There are no reported cases in which the courts of these States have defined the type of group destruction the perpetrator must have intended in order to be found guilty of genocide".
question: Two bodies of the United Nations agreed with what restricted provision in defining genocide?, answer: that biological-physical destruction was necessary | question: A definition of what, by the States, was necessary to preserve and expand genocidal law?, answer: the type of group destruction | question: Which country's courts were noted by the ECHR for taking a wider stance on provisions of genocide laws?, answer: Germany | question: The ECHR found most states to have largely undefined definitions of group destruction, despite what factor?, answer: Convention States municipal laws | question: In its preparations, what was the source of other considerations by the ECHR?, answer: the judgements of several international and municipal courts