On XX/XX/XXXX, my Paypal account ( XXXX ) shows there is one transaction charge : {$79.00} I dont recongize. I went ahead and disputed this charge. The dispute was denied right away by Paypal using the reason that this is a recurring charge since last year so it is not an unauthorized charge. I initially reported this charge as unauthorized because it occurred without my knowledge or consent. I contacted Paypal and mentioned that I just realized that I have been charged this amount two consective years since XX/XX/XXXX and argued that unauthorized charged means an non-consented charge even it was charged twice, it doesnt necessarily mean it is authorized. I later learned that Paypal categorized it as an " Item Not Received '' dispute, and subsequently ruled in favor of the merchant, XXXX XXXX, without providing any specific evidence or rationale for the decision, but just said Paypal has reviewed the info provided by the seller. I am deeply concerned about the fairness and transparency of this decision. The charge in question was presented to me as a recurring charge that I had no record of authorizing. In my initial dispute, I provided a clear explanation of why I believed the charge was unauthorized, and I expected a fair assessment of the evidence. Instead, the reasons for my dispute were altered without my consent, and the case was decided against me without any transparent explanation. 

I am particularly troubled by the fact that when I inquired about the nature of the services provided by XXXX XXXX for which I was charged, I was informed by PayPal that I should contact XXXX XXXX directly to find out, as PayPal does not have this information. This response was both unhelpful and unacceptable. It is reasonable to expect that PayPal, as the mediator in this dispute, would provide me with sufficient information to understand the basis for the decision. When I provided my Paypal email and charged credit card info on the merchant XXXX XXXX website, it came back with no order related with info provided ( please see attached screen shot ). 

The fairness and integrity of the dispute resolution process are paramount. I would like CFPB help to re-evaluate my case in light of the concerns I have raised and the absence of clear evidence to support the charge. I hope that PayPal will prioritize transparency and fairness in addressing this matter.