On XX/XX/2018, I picked up my vehicle from XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, California after a supposed strut assembly installation job was done. After picking up the vehicle, the vehicle was making novel noises from the right front wheel, indicative of problems. I asked the merchant, XXXX XXXX XXXX, what they thought the issues were. They said they are not sure, came up with several incorrect suggestions, and lastly told me to take my business elsewhere. In order to get my vehicle back, which I needed for work and school, I had to use my credit card as collateral, though I knew the job by XXXX XXXX XXXX to be botched. XXXX XXXX XXXX proceeded with charging my card an unauthorized amount of {$640.00}. After receiving my vehicle back, the noises worsened. I then towed the vehicle to another shop near my hometown and they determined the vehicle to be unsafe to drive, caused by bad work. Statements from a pre-inspection done on my vehicle before visiting XXXX XXXX XXXX corroborate the second shops statement. 

Because of the bad work done by XXXX XXXX XXXX and a job which rendered my car from operable to inoperable, I opened a case with the California Bureau of Automotive Repair. The case worker complied a file that tagged multiple violations on the part of XXXX XXXX XXXX - including performing work on a customers car that the customer did not obtain proper authorization for. California law states that a signature must be obtained before work is to be done on a customers car, verifying that the customer agrees to the repairs being done. 

Since the card used as collateral in the transaction was Discover credit card brand, they were the ones contacted to dispute this transaction. The FTC allows a 60 day window for charges to be disputed on the account of unauthorized charges and for services not delivered as agreed. Therefore, under dispute is two-fold : that XXXX XXXX XXXX did not obtain proper authorization to work on my vehicle and that their attempt at service was bad work, leaving my vehicle inoperable. Discover has refused to recognize either dispute and claims that I agreed on the services. They further claim they are unable to accept legally-affiliated documents, which cover improper credit authorization. 

Please request the California Bureau of Automotive Repairs file claim covering the violations of XXXX XXXX XXXX as needed. I will then proceed to file form SC107 in the XXXX County Court System to provide an untouched copy.