is it possible for a documentary to be utterly entranced by its subject and still show virtually no understanding of it ? 
(ROOT (SQ (VBZ is) (NP (NP (PRP it))) (ADJP (JJ possible)) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (DT a) (NN documentary)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB be) (ADVP (RB utterly)) (VP (VBN entranced) (PP (IN by) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN subject))))) (CC and) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBP show) (NP (NP (ADJP (RB virtually) (DT no)) (NN understanding)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP it))))))))) (. ?)))
(ROOT (SQ (VBZ ) (NP (NP (PRP ))) (ADJP (JJ )) (SBAR (IN ) (S (NP (DT ) (NN )) (VP (TO ) (VP (VP (VB ) (ADVP (RB )) (VP (VBN ) (PP (IN ) (NP (PRP$ ) (NN ))))) (CC ) (ADVP (RB )) (VP (VBP ) (NP (NP (ADJP (RB ) (DT )) (NN )) (PP (IN ) (NP (PRP ))))))))) (. )))