Prospective Clinical Validation of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids (PDO) Guided Therapy in Patients With Advanced/ Inoperable Solid Tumors

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcome of patients by offering personalized treatment through identifying druggable genomic aberrations within their tumors. This is particularly valid when it comes to offering alternative treatment options for patients with advanced tumors that are chemo-refractory. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are 3 dimensional tumoroids that can be expanded ex vivo and are both pheno- and genotypically identical to patients' tumors. Observational studies have shown that PDO-based drug screens can predict treatment response with high sensitivity and specificity. Vlachogiannis G. reported a living biobank of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from patients with advanced GI cancers enrolled in clinical trials. PDOs can recapitulate patients' clinical response to chemotherapeutic agents. In 19 tumor organoids, the group performed molecular profiling and drug screens and then compared ex vivo organoid responses to anticancer drugs. Drug response to PDO based orthotopic mouse tumor xenografts correlated to the drug response of the patient in clinical trials. Further to the study, there were other retrospective validation studies utilizing PDOs from patients enrolled in clinical trials such as the TUMOROID, CinClare to predict clinical response. Ooft studied PDOs from patients with metastatic colorectal cancers enrolled in the TUMOROID study to predict response to irinotecan-based therapies. Yao generated a organoid biobank of 80 locally advanced rectal cancers. These patients were derived from a phase III study (CinClare) that compared neoadjuvant chemo-radiation using either capecitabine or CAPIRI. Response to chemoradiation in patients matched to that of rectal cancer organoids (sensitivity 78% and specificity 91.9%). In a systematic analysis of 17 studies (9 on advanced GI and pancreatic cancers, one on renal cell cancer and others on miscellaneous cancers), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for discriminating patients with a clinical response through PDO-based drug screen was 0.81 (95%CI 0.69-0.89) and 0.74 (95%CI 0.64-0.82) respectively. Within 4-6 weeks, PDO-based drug screen creates a true personalised platform by predicting patient-specific drug response with high accuracy. Recent technical advancements in growing these PDO 'avatars' from biopsies have made it possible to test suitable anticancer drugs in patients with advanced inoperable tumors, and explore the new possibilities for treatment options that otherwise would be missed by standard conventional therapies. In 2019, our group embarked on PDO research; investigators obtained tissues from patients with advanced/ inoperable solid tumors, and performing drug screens on these PDOs ex vivo. In several patients, investigators were able to identified drugs not otherwise used through sequencing data, and observed remarkable clinical response in patients with PDO responsive tumors. Investigators illustrate with cases that underwent PDO culture and drug screens. [ See appendix ] In the literature, the clinical utility of treatment based on PDO informed drug options has however not been fully established. Investigators therefore propose a phase 2 proof-of-concept clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of NGS/ PDO guided treatment in patients with inoperable or metastatic solid tumors..

Detailed Description
-----------------
Under informed consents, patients undergo tissue sampling (radiologic, endoscopic or surgical excision). DNA is extracted from tissue and sent for whole-exome sequencing (WES), organoid culture and drug testing. DNA mutations in PDO models will be determined using whole-exome sequencing (WES). Mutational burden and driver genes profile will be assessed for similarities to those identified in primary cancers. The genetic data generated will be interpreted for response to FDA-approved molecular targeting drugs. Investigators would study PDO cultures resistant to available chemotherapeutic options. They would be of exceptional value to study sensitivity to targeted agents, providing alternative treatment options for chemo-refractory diseases. Based on past experience, project team has developed a Standard Operational Protocol (SOP) in the area and establish pipeline in integrative analysis with genome data. PDO Culture and Genome-guided Drug Screen.To ensure clinical usefulness of our platform, investigators aim to deliver drug options of each PDO within a meaningful timeframe. In this framework of typically 4-6 weeks, investigators shall generate organoids, study their molecular profile and undertake ex vivo drug screening that would allow us to individualize therapy for each patient. Eligible patients are seen in an MDT board where patients' case history, laboratory and radiologic results are reviewed. With informed consent to trial participation, the patient undergoes tissue sampling to his tumor (by radiologic, endoscopic, or surgical methods). Sampled tumors are then subjected to DNA extraction for whole exome sequencing, organoid culture, and drug screen. This takes between 2- 4 weeks. In the interim period, the patient is allowed to receive a chemotherapy agent, a target agent or hormone therapy between the time of the biopsy and the availability of drug screen results. An MDT will review the drug screen results and recommend the use of a drug with a response in a PDO. When several drugs are shown to be efficacious, the referring oncologist has the final discretion on the choice of chemo- or targeted agent. Tumor assessments will be performed at baseline, every 8 weeks. Investigators report all adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) based on the definitions in NCI CTCAE. Investigators report all SAEs to the Joint NTEC-CUHK CREC within 24 hours of their occurrence. Senior physicians at CREC adjudicated all SAEs. Investigators aim to determine clinical efficacy of NGS/ PDO drug screen guided treatment in patients with inoperable/ advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Investigators correlate PDO drug response ex vivo to clinical response in these patients. Our hypothesis is that WES and PDO drug screen can accurately identify candidate drugs that will reduce tumor size and confer benefits in these patients. Investigators assume a treatment response with standard treatment be around 10%. A PDO and NGS guided treatment will likely improve the response rate to about 30% or more. In the first stage, 10 patients will be accrued, If there is one or fewer response, in these 10 patients, the study will be stopped. Otherwise an additional 19 patients will be accrued for a total of 29. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 6 or more responses are observed in 29 patients. This design yields a type 1 error rate of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Investigators plan to enrol 40 or more patients over a period of 2 years, with the assumption that in about 20% of patients, PDO culture is unsuccessful.

Official Title
-----------------
Prospective Clinical Validation of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids (PDO) Guided Therapy in Patients With Advanced/ Inoperable Solid Tumors

Conditions
-----------------
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Colorectal Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: patients with metastatic, inoperable or advanced solid tumors who are refractory to at least one standard chemo- or targeted drugs. The disease is accessible for a biopsy (radiologic or endoscopic) or resection of a metastatic site. These patients are seen at a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting prior to referrals. aged >18 years, able to provide written consents to trial participation, with an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, with measurable disease in accordance with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. deem suitable for standard chemo-therapy; i.e. with a normal neutrophil count, hemoglobin > 9g/dl, serum creatinine, <1.5 x upper limit of normal, bilirubin < 1.5 x normal, Aspartate and alanine aminotransferases (<3 x ULN or <5x those with liver metastasis) and with an ejection Fraction >50% of normal on echocardiography. Exclusion Criteria: unable to provide informed consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 100 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Intervention in this study is to perform tissue sampling to patient's tumor which are then subjected to DNA extraction for whole exome sequencing, organoid culture, and drug screen. An MDT board will review the drug screen results and excluded drug choice of poor response. Then the referring oncologist has the final discretion on the choice of chemo- or targeted agent as usual.
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids (PDO) Guided Therapy<br>Intervention in this study is to perform tissue sampling to patient's tumor which are then subjected to DNA extraction for whole exome sequencing, organoid culture, and drug screen. An MDT board will review the drug screen results and excluded drug choice of poor response. Then the referring oncologist has the final discretion on the choice of chemo- or targeted agent as usual. | Other: Patient-Derived Tumor Organoids<br>* Intervention in this study is to perform tissue sampling to patient's tumor which are then subjected to DNA extraction for whole exome sequencing, organoid culture, and drug screen. An MDT board will review the drug screen results and excluded drug choice of poor response. Then the referring oncologist has the final discretion on the choice of chemo- or targeted agent as usual.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| tumor response | tumor response, partial or complete (>30% reduction in tumor size) | 6 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| rate of partial or complete response | rate of partial or complete response | 6 months | 
| rate of progression free survival survival | rate of progression free survival | 6 months | 
| rate of overall survival | rate of overall survival | 6 months | 
| success rate in PDO culture and drug screen | success rate in PDO culture and drug screen | 6 months | 
| rate of grade III/IV toxicities. | rate of grade III/IV toxicities. | 6 months |