The Impact of Social Phone Calls on Adults Who Have Had a Stroke

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to see the impact of social visits, through weekly phone calls, on quality of life and health outcomes of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and self-rated health for adults who have experienced an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and to determine the benefit of these conversations on the student volunteer's perspective of adults who have survived a stroke

Official Title
-----------------
The Impact of Social Phone Calls on Adults Who Have Had a Stroke

Conditions
-----------------
Stroke

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Social Phone Calls


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: have a UCLA short form score of 4 or higher can read, write, and speak English have had an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke is the past year have a telephone and are available for weekly phone calls provide informed consent agreeing to be contacted by the volunteers Exclusion Criteria: reside outside of the home have Electronic Health Record documentation of Aphasia Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of <9

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Treatment group<br> | Behavioral: Social Phone Calls<br>* Following the collection of baseline data, the study participant will be randomly assigned to a student volunteer to begin the social phone calls. The first phone call will be scheduled to occur within one week of the consent and baseline assessments. A minimum of one social phone call will occur each week for 6weeks. Each phone call is expected to last around 1 hour with flexibility to be shorter or longer. The calls will be unstructured and designed simply to engage in conversation with the participant. The length of the phone calls, days and times will be recorded by the volunteer along with a short journal entry describing the conversation topics and any information that stood out to the volunteer. If the stroke survivor and student volunteer wish to speak more than the designated one call a week, that will be allowed if both parties agree. The same student volunteer will conduct all six sessions<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who enrolled in the study |  | post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who completed all 6 phone calls |  | post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who completed all the assessments |  | post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in loneliness as assessed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale | This is a 20 item questionnaire, each one is scored form 1(never) to 4(always). Scores for questions 1,5,6,9,10,15,16,19 and 20 are reversed(i.e. 1=4,2=3,3=2,4=1)and the scores for each item is then summed together, higher number indicating more loneliness | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Change in depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) | This is a 20 item questionnaire, each item is scored from 0(rarely or none of the time)-3 (most or all of the time) with a possible range of scores from 0-60 a higher score indicating more depression | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Change in anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale (GAD 7) | This is a 7 item questionnaire, each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) a higher number indicating more anxiety | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Change in social support as assessed by the Duke Social Support Index (DSSI) Scale | This is a 10 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1-3,with a maximum score of 30 and higher score indicating higher levels of support | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Change in resilience as assessed by the brief resilience scale | This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is measured from 1(strongly disagree)-5(strongly agree) for maximum score of 30 a higher score indicating greater resilience to stressful events | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 
| Change in pain as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form | This questionnaire has 2 subscales : The first subscale is the pain severity subscale which consists of 4 questions and each are scored from 0(no pain)-10(severe pain), a higher number indicating more pain The second subscale is the pain interference score and it contains 7 items and each is scored from 0(does not interfere)-10(completely interferes) a higher number indicating worse outcome. | Baseline, post intervention (6 weeks from start of intervention) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
stroke, phone calls, social support, loneliness, ischemic stroke