Comparison of ISQ in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Regenerated Bone

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Compare ISQ values of implants placed in antral area in native bone vs regenerated bone with a follow-up at 3 months to compare values changes.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The stability of dental implants is influenced by the type of bone in which the implant is placed. Native bone tends to provide better initial stability due to its density and quality, while regenerated bone, it is logical to think that it may present less stability due to the quality of the generated bone and the presence of defects in the treated area. In this study it has been observed that after 3 months more stability is observed in the antral area, measured in ISQ resonance frequency in implants on regenerated bone, which surprises us and this result is explained in detail in said study.

Official Title
-----------------
Comparison Between Value of Resonance Frequency Analysis (ISQ) in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Native Bone vs Value Obtained in Implants Placed in Antral Area on Regenerated Bone and Its Evolution After 3 Months

Conditions
-----------------
Implant Site Reaction

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: sinus lift
* Device: resonance frequency analysis


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients Total superior edentulism or antral zone edentulism Accepted study and signed inform consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients under 23 years old Non accepted study or signed inform consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 23 Years
Maximum Age: 85 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Native bone<br>the evolution of the SSI and its change after 3 months of placing the implant in native bone in the antral area | Device: resonance frequency analysis<br>* analysis of the ISQ evolution and its changes after 3 months of placing the implant in native or regenerated bone, always in the antral area<br>* Other names: ISQ;|
| Regenerated Bone<br>the evolution of the SSI and its change after 3 months of placing the implant in regenerated bone in the antral area | Procedure: sinus lift<br>* Implant placement on grafted sinus vs antral autogenous bone<br>* Other names: alveolar preservation;Device: resonance frequency analysis<br>* analysis of the ISQ evolution and its changes after 3 months of placing the implant in native or regenerated bone, always in the antral area<br>* Other names: ISQ;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) measurements | The day of surgery, data were collected by vestibular and palatal, in addition, the mean of both measurements was taken and ISQ data were collected vertically to complete all the information. After 3 months of implant placement we recorded the same measurements and compared them in native and regenerated bone. | 3 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Insertion torque measurements | Analysis of the insertion torque values measured in Newtons per centimeter (Ncm) and comparing the results of both groups. | During implant placement | 
| Changes in the marginal bone | Analysis of the changes in the marginal bone three months after implant placement | 3 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Implant placement, native bone, regenerated bone, resonance frequency analysis, ISQ value, Ostell