Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study aimed to investigate the effect of using a loupe and dental operating microscope with different magnifications on the success of class II direct composite restorations.

Detailed Description
-----------------
A total of 130 class II, D2 deep caries teeth of 85 patients were randomly distributed to the naked eye, 3x magnification loupe, 5x magnification loupe, 8.5x magnification dental operating microscope (DOM) groups, and direct composite restorations were made with these magnification aids. carried out. Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Clearfil Majesty Posterior composite were used in all restorations. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at 1,6 and 12-month periods, and restorations were scored between 1 and 5 for all criteria.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids

Conditions
-----------------
Dental Caries

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Dental Loupe
* Device: Dental Operation Microscope


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Good oral and dental care of the patient, The need for at least 1 Class II restoration at a depth of D2 in the posterior group teeth, No crowding in the tooth to be restored, tooth contact and antagonist, The relevant tooth is vital, Absence of pain on percussion and palpation of the tooth. Absence of any pathology in the periapical tissues in radiographic evaluation, The patient was informed about the study and accepted the study, Having agreed to attend 1 month, 6 month and 12 month control sessions, The patient has no systemic disease, Exclusion Criteria: Presence of severe periodontal disease, Teeth that cannot be insulated, malposed or overloaded or not loaded at all, Periodontal and endodontic removal of the relevant tooth is healthy, the patient is undergoing orthodontic treatment, Recording of dry mouth is set, Severe bruxism habit, Smoking

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 50 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: It has 4 groups in total. The treatments were carried out with no magnification aid with x2 loupe with x5 loupe with Dental operation microscope
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| No Intervention: with no magnification aid treatment<br>Dental caries treatment with no magnification aid | |
| Active Comparator: with x2 dental loupe<br>Dental caries treatment with x2 dental loupe | Device: Dental Loupe<br>* Magnification aid<br>|
| Active Comparator: with x5 dental loupe<br>Dental caries treatment with x5 dental loupe | Device: Dental Loupe<br>* Magnification aid<br>|
| Active Comparator: with dental operation microscope<br>Dental caries treatment with dental operation microscope | Device: Dental Operation Microscope<br>* Magnification aid<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluation of Restoration Success using FDI Criteria | FDI criteria were categorized into three groups [3]: esthetic (four criteria), functional (three criteria) and biological (one criterion) parameters | a week after dental treatment | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
dental loupe, restoration success, FDI criteria