Reduction of Mechanical IV Complication Using a New Medical Device

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Peripheral intravenous catheters are necessary for in-hospital medical treatment. Malfunction due to occlusion or dislodgement is common, and increases the burden on health care. The aim of this study is to determine if the use of a new medical device has an impact on mechanical complications rate when peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter is used. The study will also investigate the safety, opinions of healthcare personnel and health economic effects of this new device,

Detailed Description
-----------------
It is estimated that around 1.5 billion peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are sold every year globally, and placing them is one of the most common invasive procedures in hospitalised patients, with up to 90% receiving one, yet there is a failure rate of up to 69%. Some of the most common causes of failure are considered to be phlebitis, subcutaneous infiltration, occlusion and dislodgement. These failure rates vary widely, where published data suggests rates of 8-44% for phlebitis, 5-21% for infiltration, 7.6-16% for occlusion and 5-10% for dislodgement. Phlebitis, commonly defined as an inflammatory process in the wall of a vein, resulting in a blood clot formation; while infiltration is defined as the inadvertent leakage of a solution into the surrounding tissue; occlusion is defined as PIVC failure due to blockage where flushing and/or aspiration is not possible, and dislodgement the complete accidental/inadverted removal of the PIVC before intended. Previous studies have suggested that mechanical irritation could be an important factor resulting in PIVC failure. In the case of phlebitis, mechanical movements against the endothelial wall could initiate a cascade of prothrombotic events resulting in the formation of a blood clot, something that has been demonstrated in a simulated environment. Therefore, there is a need to investigate potential new methods for prevention of these mechanical complications, and one way could be in the reduction of mechanical forces acting on the vessels. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new medical device in reducing the number of mechanical complications during IV therapy. The investigators have divided the research questions into a primary endpoint and secondary endpoints. Primary endpoint: The rate of mechanical complications of an IV therapy session using a new medical device (ReLink) compared to using current 'state of the art'. Secondary endpoint: Frequency and severity of any adverse events Healthcare workers opinion of the new medical device The economic cost of these disruptions to the hospital or healthcare facility in terms of man-hours, and resources The study is a randomized controlled trial to be run at Uppsala University Hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group receiving IV infusion treatment using the new medical device ReLink, or the control group receiving IV infusion treatment without the device. Once the full intended IV infusion treatment has been completed, the same patient may be re-randomized and re-included in the trial. In case there is a mechanical complication resulting in the exchange of peripheral catheter, the patient will be re-randomized to either the control or intervention group. The risk of introducing a bias by re-randomizing the patients has been analysed and is considered to be minor. Firstly, in case of a re-randomization, this will take place after the follow-up of a peripheral catheter is completed. Secondly, re-randomization has been chosen instead of a cross-over design (where a patient's second peripheral catheter would automatically be selected to the other group) to avoid a spill-over effect from the patient themselves being biased against or in favour of using the device.

Official Title
-----------------
Reduction of Mechanical IV Complication Using a New Medical Device

Conditions
-----------------
Catheter Complications

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: ReLink


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: The patient has or will get a PIVC expected to be used for continuous or intermittent IV infusion therapy. Continuous IV infusion is defined as an infusion ≥ 2h and intermittent as an infusion lasting 15min to < 2h. ≥18 years of age Speaks and understands Swedish Exclusion Criteria: The PIVC is expected to be used for sampling only Pregnancy Unable to obtain informed consent or without an available Next-of-kin to provide surrogate informed consent Patients under palliative care Bolus IV infusion, defined as an infusion time of <15 min Phlebitis, infiltration or occlusion associated with PIVC that is already in place at the time of inclusion

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: ReLink<br>Medical device to be tested | Device: ReLink<br>* Medical device<br>|
| No Intervention: Control<br>Control, no medical device | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The rate of mechanical complications of an IV therapy session using a new medical device (ReLink) compared to using current 'state of the art'. | Mechanical complications is defined as phlebitis, subcutaneous infiltration, occlusion or dislodgement | Up to one week from randomization | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Frequency and severity of any adverse events | Recording of any adverse events during the trial | Up to one week from randomization | 
| Healthcare workers opinion of the new medical device | Questionnaire asking healthcare workers opinion, maximum score 5/ minimum score 0, high scores indicated better outcome | Within one week of removal of the device | 
| The economic cost of these disruptions to the hospital or healthcare facility in terms of man-hours, and resources | Economical calculations based on additional materials and healthcare workers time | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |