A Feasibility Study of a Novel, Fully Remote Counseling and Sound Therapy Program for Hyperacusis

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
There is no universal approach used to treat hyperacusis, a condition defined as having reactions to sound as too loud, annoying, fearful, or painful. A collaborative report published by prominent researchers recommended counseling and sound therapy for managing hyperacusis, but emphasized the need for rigorously designed clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of these treatments. The investigators developed a face-to-face counseling approach, Hyperacusis Activities Treatment (HAT), and have demonstrated its effectiveness for in-person therapy. In this study, the investigators will conduct a controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the two components of HAT in managing hyperacusis: Aim 1, remotely delivered counseling, and Aim 2, sound therapy. In Aim 1, participants will complete four weeks of remote counseling using instructional videos, homework activities, discussion forums, and hands-on exercises. To ensure rigor in the approach, all participants will complete 4 weeks of weekly monitoring (control) before beginning counseling (treatment) for an additional 4 weeks. In aim 2, participants will be randomized into one of two sound therapy groups: (1) Group 1: Listen to their individually chosen bothersome sounds using successive approximations or a gradual increase in sound level; and (2) Group 2: Listen to continuous, low-level background noise. In both groups, devices will be fit remotely and used for 1-2 hours per day for four weeks. Completion of this R15 Academic Research Enhancement Award project at Augustana College will lead to a shift in hyperacusis management by providing early clinical evidence for the effectiveness of the components that make up the HAT protocol: counseling and sound therapy.

Detailed Description
-----------------
In this research study, the investigators will develop and test a novel, remote counseling program to reduce reactions to hyperacusis (Aim 1), and compare effectiveness of two sound therapy options fitted remotely for managing hyperacusis symptoms (Aim 2). In Aim 1, all participants will complete 4 weeks of weekly monitoring (control) before beginning counseling (treatment) using the approach of Hyperacusis Activities Treatment through a combination of recorded videos, hands-on activities, discussion forums, and quizzes for an additional 4 weeks. The investigators will share materials including the videos, hands-on activities, and quizzes, via a secure learning management system that will provide easy access to all participants. The counseling materials from HAT will focus on education about the auditory system, loudness perception and mechanisms for hyperacusis, and the rationale for sound therapy. After remote counseling, participants from Aim 1 will receive one of two sound therapy approaches for hyperacusis relief in Aim 2. The investigators will randomize the participants into one of two groups: 1) Group 1: listen to their individually chosen bothersome sounds that trigger hyperacusis and 2) Group 2: listen to low-level, continuous background noise (i.e., white noise). In both groups, participants will be fit remotely with the devices and use sound therapy for four weeks. For Group 1, the student researchers will record the three to four most bothersome sounds for the individual participant, provide recordings of waveforms, and send equipment to participants for their use. In Group 2, participants will listen to continuous, low-level broadband noise using sound generators programmed and dispensed by the PI and student researchers. For both groups, the investigators will track use and volume settings during the four-week trial using the devices' data logging features. To determine the effectiveness of the two major components of HAT in Aims 1 and 2, the investigators will employ quantitative measurements of the Inventory of Hyperacusis (IHS), the Hyperacusis Problems Questionnaire (HPQ), the psychoacoustic test using natural sounds, the Hyperacusis Disability and Handicap Scale, and the Meaning of Life Questionnaire. The investigators will administer these measurements before and after treatment for Aim 1, and before and after treatment for Aim 2. The primary interest is to determine if the treatments show promise in treating hyperacusis. The investigators will analyze the data by comparing mean difference scores using paired t-test within the same group and independent samples t-test between the two groups for each treatment in Aim 2. The results from power analyses suggest a reasonable effect size of 0.75 with a sample size of 29 subjects per group for Aim 2. A sample size of 30 per group is deemed appropriate to detect significant differences for all proposed analyses. The power analysis is based on Aim 2; therefore, there is ample power in Aim 1 to detect pre- and post-treatment differences. The goal of enrolling 30 participants per group for this feasibility study is reasonable for the research team (i.e., enroll two participants per month during the academic year and four participants per month during the summer months).

Official Title
-----------------
A Feasibility Study of a Novel, Fully Remote Counseling and Sound Therapy Program for Hyperacusis

Conditions
-----------------
Hyperacusis

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Sound therapy using low-level background sound
* Behavioral: Remote counseling using HAT-Online
* Other: Sound therapy using successive approximations


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Have hyperacusis as primary diagnosis Have access to a smartphone or computer Exclusion Criteria: Severe tinnitus Hearing loss that is severe or profound Recent history of hyperacusis counseling or treatment in last two months

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Repeated Measures with two treatment groups
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: HAT-Online Counseling<br>In Aim 1, the investigators will provide remote counseling for four weeks to 60 participants and compare results to baseline. All participants will be in a wait list control for four weeks before the counseling begins. | Behavioral: Remote counseling using HAT-Online<br>* This study will implement Hyperacusis Activities Treatment-Online, a four-week remote counseling program in Aim 1.<br>|
| Experimental: Sound therapy<br>In Aim 2, the investigators will randomize the 60 participants to receive intervention using one of the two sound therapy approaches. Group 1: Listening to bothersome sounds or Group 2: Listening to low-level background noise. | Device: Sound therapy using low-level background sound<br>* This study will use an FDA-regulated device, a tinnitus masker, as one of the sound therapy options in Aim 2. The tinnitus masker will provide low-level background sound for hyperacusis relief.<br>Other: Sound therapy using successive approximations<br>* This study will use the approach of successive approximations with the participants' bothersome sounds in Aim 2.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in hyperacusis symptoms from baseline to counseling at 8 weeks and sound therapy at 12 weeks | The Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms (IHS) is a 25-item questionnaire assessing hyperacusis reactions and severity, and allows for differentiation between the subtypes of hyperacusis including loudness and pain. Through psychometric evaluation, the IHS is a reliable and sensitive tool for assessing hyperacusis symptoms for research and clinical applications. Participants respond to each item using a 4-point scale from 1 = not at all to 4 = very much so. | Measurements will be completed four times during the study: 1) baseline, 2) four weeks (before Aim 1), 3) eight weeks (end Aim 1, before Aim 2), and 4) 12 weeks (end Aim 2). | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in hyperacusis problems from baseline to counseling at 8 weeks and sound therapy at 12 weeks | The Hyperacusis Problems Questionnaire (HPQ) is an open-ended questionnaire that assesses the number of problems that patients experience because of hyperacusis. The related problems are rank ordered to determine the most problematic situations affecting a patient with hyperacusis. | Measurements will be completed four times during the study: 1) baseline, 2) four weeks (before Aim 1), 3) eight weeks (end Aim 1, before Aim 2), and 4) 12 weeks (end Aim 2). | 
| Change in ratings of natural sounds using a psychoacoustic test from baseline to counseling at 8 weeks and sound therapy at 12 weeks | In this psychoacoustic test, the participant is presented with a set of natural sounds and rates the sounds from pleasant to unpleasant using a visual analog scale. Sounds are presented via headphones using a tablet at multiple sound levels (60 and 80 dB SPL, or sound pressure level in decibels). | Measurements will be completed four times during the study: 1) baseline, 2) four weeks (before Aim 1), 3) eight weeks (end Aim 1, before Aim 2), and 4) 12 weeks (end Aim 2). | 
| Change in disability resulting from hyperacusis assessed at baseline to counseling at 8 weeks and sound therapy at 12 weeks | A 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's reactions to their hyperacusis using numerical ratings and bothersome sounds. Responses are differentiated based on the subtypes of hyperacusis including loudness, annoyance, fear, and pain. Participants rate the sounds using a scale from 0 (not loud/annoying/fearful/painful) to 100 (unbearably loud/annoying/fearful/painful). | Measurements will be completed four times during the study: 1) baseline, 2) four weeks (before Aim 1), 3) eight weeks (end Aim 1, before Aim 2), and 4) 12 weeks (end Aim 2). | 
| Change in quality of life from baseline to counseling at 8 weeks and sound therapy at 12 weeks | The Meaning of Life Questionnaire includes 23 items that assess quality of life using a broad perspective with items that load on four factors: friendship and positive outlook, physical health, hearing and mental health, and satisfaction with life. Participants rate their agreement with each statement from 0-100 (0=completely disagree; 100=completely agree) and then a total score is calculated based on the average of all 23 items. | Measurements will be completed four times during the study: 1) baseline, 2) four weeks (before Aim 1), 3) eight weeks (end Aim 1, before Aim 2), and 4) 12 weeks (end Aim 2). | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Sound therapy, Counseling