EVASION: Effect of VisuAl Stimulation on attentION

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The main objective is to compare changes in information processing speed after 30 days of intervention in participants with a dysexecutive mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software) or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation. Secondary objectives are: To compare, after 30 days of intervention, in participants with a dysexecutive MCI and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software), or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation : changes in information processing speed of each subtest, changes in cognitive performance, changes in executive functions, changes in walking performance. To compare the quality of life, after 30 days of intervention, of participants with a dysexecutive MCI and receiving either cognitive stimulation by adapted visual exercises (Emeraude® software) or the broadcasting of a television program without cognitive stimulation. In the Intervention group, to study correlations between changes in information processing speed index and the final level reached for each cognitive stimulation exercise.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Attentional abilities are among the cognitive functions that are most frequently and earliest altered during aging, particularly in the case of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. This decline can be the cause of a cognitive complaint in the patient or his relatives from the prodromal stage of the disease. This mild cognitive impairment is not sufficiently advanced to have an impact on independence and autonomy, even though recent studies have reported an early modification of walking in this population, in particular in the case of a dysexecutive MCI. The current challenge is to develop strategies to prevent cognitive decline in these patients with MCI and to avoid conversion to major neurocognitive disorders. However, while memory workshops are offered to patients with amnestic MCI, no strategy is clearly identified for dysexecutive MCI. Interestingly, the integration of sensory information is modified in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, and in particular visuomotor difficulties in the early stages. Measurements of evoked potentials during visual stimulation have shown that sensory responses are preserved but cognitive responses are reduced in patients with MCI. Based on this observation, an American team recently tested the effectiveness of computer-assisted visual cognitive exercises performed regularly for 8 weeks in patients without dementia, and reported an improvement in information processing speed and walking performance. These results lead us to hypothesize that regular cognitive stimulation exercises using adapted visual exercises could improve the attentional capacities and in particular the information processing speed (=mental speed) of elderly people with a dysexecutive MCI. A complex brain stimulation software Emeraude® has recently been developed by the Centre Régional Basse Vision in Angers from a software used for more than 30 years in people with visual impairment.

Official Title
-----------------
Effet d'Exercices Visuels de Stimulation Cognitive Sur Les capacités Attentionnelles Chez la Personne âgée (Etude Pilote)

Conditions
-----------------
Dysexecutive Mild Cognitive Impairment

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Visual cognitive stimulation exercises
* Procedure: Broadcast of a television program


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 60 years Diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment of a dysexecutive or multidomain dysexecutive nature, according to Winblad consensus criteria Presence of an informal caregiver Subject gave and signed informed consent to participate in the study Affiliation to a social security scheme Exclusion Criteria: Presence of severe depressive symptoms (4-item Geriatric Depression Scale score > 2) Ophthalmological or central pathology that may affect the performance of stimulation exercises Regular use of psychotropic drugs that may have an impact on the performance of stimulation exercises, in the opinion of the investigator (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, neuroleptics, hypnotics) Use of anticonvulsant drugs Existence of a confusional syndrome Participation in another simultaneous clinical trial Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision Person under forced psychiatric care Person subject to a legal protection measure Person unable to give consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 60 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intervention group<br> | Procedure: Visual cognitive stimulation exercises<br>* Patients included in Intervention group will receive a 30-minute session of complex visual stimuli on a touch screen (3 10-minute exercises : saccade exercises, then pursuit exercises, then matching exercises) every other day for 30 days, with increasing difficulty of the exercises as the sessions progress.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Comparator group<br> | Procedure: Broadcast of a television program<br>* Patients included in Comparator group will watch a 30-minute television program (Allô Docteurs) on a touch screen every other day for 30 days.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Changes in information processing speed | Changes in information processing speed is assessed by processing speed index | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Changes in information processing speed of each subtest | This outcome is assessed by Symbol Search end Coding scores | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in cognitive performance | This outcome is assessed by ADAS-cog score | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in executive functions (cognitive flexibility) | Cognitive flexibility is measured by time needed to perform the Trail-Making Test (TMT) part B minus A | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in executive functions (cognitive inhibition) | Cognitive inhibition is measured by time needed to perform the interference task minus the time needed to perform the denomination task | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in executive functions (working memory updating) | Working memory updating is assessed by digit span test | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in walking performance | Changes in walking performance is assessed by changes in coefficient of variation of stride time | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Changes in quality of life | Quality of life is assessed by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) | Baseline and after 30 days of intervention | 
| Correlations between changes in information processing speed index and the final level reached for each cognitive stimulation exercise | This outcome is assessed by the final level achieved for each cognitive stimulation exercise | After 30 days of intervention | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Geriatrics, Cognitive impairment, Visual stimulation