Biostimulation After Tooth Extraction

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy on postoperative pain and wound healing in children undergoing primary molar extractions 40children, 6-10 years of age, systemically healthy, and had atraumatic extraction indications of bilateral primary molar teeth were included in the study. A randomly selected tooth was extracted under local anesthesia in the first session. Only the clot formation on the socket was observed and photographed in the control group. Other group extractions were performed 2weeks later. The LLLT group was treated with a 980 nm wavelength Doctor Smile Wiser diode laser and photographed. Non-epithelialized surface measurements were performed with the ImageJ program. Pain assessment was performed with the Wong-Baker Pain Scale. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software.

Official Title
-----------------
Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Wound Healing and Post-Operative Pain Management of Primary Molar Teeth Ex-traction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Dental Caries in Children, Wound Heal

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Tooth extraction


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: indication for tooth extraction in bilateral primary molars did not have any systemic disease the use of antibiotics and painkillers was stopped at least 12 hours ago Exclusion Criteria: require complicated tooth extractions systemic disease the use of antibiotics and painkillers in 12 hours

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 6 Years
Maximum Age: 10 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Sequential Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Sham Comparator: Control Group<br>No application was made after the tooth extraction procedure in the control group. | Other: Tooth extraction<br>* Tooth extractions were performed by a single physician. Topical anesthesia (Xylo-caine, Astra, Södertalje, Switzerland) was applied to the dried mucosa in the area to be lo-calized with the help of an ear stick for 1 minute. Posterior-superior-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and palatal anesthesia were applied for the upper primary molars; Inferi-or-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and lingual anesthesia (Ultracain, Aventis Pharma, Is-tanbul, Turkey) were applied for the lower primary molars. After anesthesia control was achieved, a randomly selected tooth was extracted. Tooth extraction on the other side was performed two weeks later. During the shootings, attention was paid to the traumatic ap-proach. After the control of bleeding was achieved, data were recorded for each group.<br>|
| Experimental: Low- Level Laser Group (Doctor Smile Wiser)<br>In the Laser group, the diode laser device Doctor Smile Wiser (Wiser, Doctor Smile, Milan, Italy) (Figue 1) with a wavelength of 980 nm and a power of 0.5 W was used for LLLT. During the procedure, the patient, physician, and assistant staff wore protective glasses (Wiser, Doctor Smile, Milan, Italy). With 300 mW of energy, a 400 m tip held 1 cm away from the extraction socket was applied to the extraction socket for 60 seconds from three points determined from the vestibule, lingual/palatal, and occlusal surfaces. | Other: Tooth extraction<br>* Tooth extractions were performed by a single physician. Topical anesthesia (Xylo-caine, Astra, Södertalje, Switzerland) was applied to the dried mucosa in the area to be lo-calized with the help of an ear stick for 1 minute. Posterior-superior-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and palatal anesthesia were applied for the upper primary molars; Inferi-or-alveolar nerve block anesthesia and lingual anesthesia (Ultracain, Aventis Pharma, Is-tanbul, Turkey) were applied for the lower primary molars. After anesthesia control was achieved, a randomly selected tooth was extracted. Tooth extraction on the other side was performed two weeks later. During the shootings, attention was paid to the traumatic ap-proach. After the control of bleeding was achieved, data were recorded for each group.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Wound healing | For the evaluation of soft tissue healing in extraction sockets, intraoral photographs were taken at an angle of 60° to the occlusal surface on the 3rd and 7th days following the extraction session. Non-epithelialized surface measurements were made by two observing physicians using the ImageJ (NIH, Rockville, USA) program. | intervention (tooth extraction) day, 3rd day and 7th day | 
| Pain score | Pain assessment in both groups was performed with the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale PRS). Patients were asked to choose a face or number from the scale, and the selected value was the practitioner dentist on the day of the procedure; other days were recorded by the parent. This scale is graded from 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, and 10 marks the most severe pain. It is asked to evaluate the pain according to the facial expression. | intervention day (tooth extraction), 3rd day and 7th day |