linjc16/ctgov huggingface dataset:
The Safe-line Technique as Additional Attempt to Mitigate Spinal Cord Ischemia After Endovascular Exclusion of TAAA

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
To assess safety and feasebility of the safe-line technique in a multicenter international collaboration.

Detailed Description
-----------------
To assess safety and efficacy of a technique for temporary aneurysm sac re-perfusion (TASreP) after total endovascular exclusion of TAAA, using a guide-wire left into the aneurysm sac. The technique can be applied both in elective that urgent cases. The guide-wire aim to be a safe-line for fast temporary trans-sealing aneurysm sac re-perfusion in case of SCI occurring in the early post-operative period (48-to 72h). Before completing exclusion, from the percutaneous femoral access, a second buddy-wire (V-18 guidewire; Boston Scientific) is advanced and left posterior to the endograft into the aneurysmal sac; through the main guide-wire, the final aneurysm exclusion is completed with distal stent-graft deployment and the femoral access sealed with Proglide leaving in place the sole V.018 draped in a sterile fashion. In the case of SCI occurrence in the post-operative period up to 48-72 hrs, the trans-sealing V.18 safe-line can be rapidly exchanged with a 6F/65 cm long Destination cm guiding sheath (Terumo) and positioned into the aneurysmal sac; this can be connected to a 6F introducer from the contralateral femoral artery and the sac perfused in a retrograde fashion.

Official Title
-----------------
The Safe-line Technique as Additional Attempt to Mitigate Spinal Cord Ischemia After Endovascular Thoraco-abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Conditions
-----------------
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: safe-line technique


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm including type I,II,III,IV and V. Pararenale aneurysm Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm Elective and Urgent, endovascular repair; Endovascular repair of any thoracoabdominal aortic condition Exclusion Criteria: -thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 100 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Procedure: safe-line technique|Safe-line approach|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Incidence of adverse events | collect eventual complications (incidence of: 1- axis thrombosis; 2- microembolization; 3-hematoma) | 7 days | 
| Incidence of spinal cord ischemia improvement or resolution | collect all events that in case of post-operative (48-72hrs) spinal cord ischemia had symptoms mitigation (1-paraplegia improvement; 2 - paraplegia complete resolution) | 30 days |
Lymphatic Function During Mechanical Ventilation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study wil examine the effect of altered intrathoracic pressure on lymphatic function, by investigating the lymphatic vessels in the lower limb during mechanical ventilation. The lymphatic function will be examined using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging.

Detailed Description
-----------------
This study wil examine the effect of altered intrathoracic pressure on lymphatic function. This will be done by investigating peripheral lymphatic vessels on patients undergoing surgery for malformations of the jaw who are being mechanically ventilated. Subjects will be examined on two occasions. One to establish baseline function, and one during surgery following a ventilation protocol with altered PIP and PEEP.

Official Title
-----------------
Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Peripheral Lymphatic Function - do Elevated Intrathoracic Pressure Impact Lymphatic Flow?

Conditions
-----------------
Lymphatic Insufficiency

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Elevated pressure ventilation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing surgery for jaw malformations Age > 18 years Informed consent Cardiopulmonary healthy Exclusion Criteria: History of Cardiac disease History of pulmonary disease History of lymphatic disease Peripheral edema Chronic infectious disease Age > 30 years BMI > 30

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 30 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Procedure: Elevated pressure ventilation|Elevated pressure ventilation is defined as a raise in PIP and PEEP by 10 cmH2O from each patients original pressure setting, although never higher than a PIP of 30 cmH2O.|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Peripheral lymphatic velocity (centimeters/second) | Peripheral lymphatic fluid velocity (centimeters/second) will be calculated based upon NIRF sequences. | 3 hours | 
| Peripheral lymphatic frequency (contractions/minute) | Peripheral lymphatic contraction frequency (contractions/minute) will be calculated based upon NIRF sequences. | 3 hours |
The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Selective Motor Control and Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between lower extremity selectivity and gait in children with cerebral palsy. 32 volunteer children with CP between the ages of 5-20 will participate in the study. The Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) questionnaire will be used to assess lower extremity selectivity, and the Edinburgh observational gait scale will be used to assess gait. Both assessments are observational.

Official Title
-----------------
The Relationship Between Lower Extremity Selective Motor Control and Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Conditions
-----------------
Cerebral Palsy

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Between the ages of 5-20 Diagnosed with CP Exclusion Criteria: Medical complications that limit participation in assessments (for example, severe visual impairment) Lower extremity surgery or botox surgery in the last 6 months Mental problems that cannot understand the commands given

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 5 Years
Maximum Age: 20 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Edinburgh Visual Gait Score | It consists of 17 items scored separately for the right and left lower extremities. Assessments include 6 anatomical levels: trunk, pelvis, hip, knee, ankle, and foot. These anatomical levels are evaluated in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes. A 3-point ordinal scale is used for scoring. In scoring, a value of 0 indicates normal, a value of 1 indicates moderate deviation from normal, and a value of 2 indicates significant deviation from normal. The scores obtained by watching the camera recordings for each lower extremity are summed and a single score is obtained. | Baseline | 
| Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) | Evaluates the selective motor control of the lower extremities. It evaluates hip, knee, ankle, subtalar and finger joints bilaterally. Voluntary flexion and extension movements are observed to assess selective voluntary motor control at each joint. Except for the hip joint, which is tested in the side-lying position to allow adequate joint movement, the evaluation of other joints is made in the sitting position. | Baseline |
Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Study (Beckenboden-Rehabilitationsstudie - BREST)

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study compares the effectiveness of standard care, pelvic floor muscle training or vaginal pessary for the treatment of postpartum urinary incontinence.

Official Title
-----------------
Beckenboden-Rehabilitationsstudie (BREST)

Conditions
-----------------
Postpartum Urinary Incontinence

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Vaginal pessary
* Behavioral: Standard care
* Procedure: Pelvic floor muscle training


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years or older gave birth within the 12 weeks prior to the postpartum visit postpartum urinary incontinence able to understand and give consent in German Exclusion Criteria: treatment for postpartum urinary incontinence that started prior to inclusion any neurologic disease that impairs bladder function

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Standard care<br> | Behavioral: Standard care<br>* Standard care consisted of a pelvic floor group exercise course led by a midwife, a physiotherapist, or an osteopath. Courses were in general once a week for a minimum of seven to a maximum of twelve weeks. The course was chosen by the patient, and the study team had no influence on the choice.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Pelvic floor muscle training<br> | Procedure: Pelvic floor muscle training<br>* Twelve pelvic floor physiotherapy sessions were prescribed by the study physician. Pelvic floor physiotherapy was performed in individual courses by trained physiotherapists. The patient was free to choose the physiotherapist and the study team had no influence on the choice.<br>|
| Experimental: Vaginal pessary<br> | Device: Vaginal pessary<br>* In the pessary group, all patients received a cube pessary, which was individually adapted to each patient. These pessaries exist in sizes 0 (25 mm edge length) to 9 (75 mm edge length). Patients were instructed by a physician or a trained nurse on how to autonomously manage the pessary, including daily changing and cleaning. After one week of treatment, all patients had an office visit to check if fitting was correct and if autonomous handling of the pessary was feasible. Treatment duration was 12 weeks.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| patients' self-reported satisfaction with the treatment |  | 12 weeks |
Pain Score and Opioid Consumption of Index and Previous Cesarean Delivery

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Postoperative pain after cesarean delivery is common and affects on both mothers and children. The goals of this retrospective observational study aim to predict pain score and opioid consumption of index cesarean delivery from pain score and opioid consumption of previous cesarean delivery.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The authors will review the medical records of recruited participants for demographic data as well as pain scores and opioid consumption of index cesarean delivery and previous cesarean delivery.

Official Title
-----------------
Prediction of Pain Score and Opioid Consumption of Index Cesarean Delivery From Pain Score and Opioid Consumption of Previous Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study

Conditions
-----------------
Pain, Postoperative

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: No intervention


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who had at least 2 cesarean deliveries Patients received spinal anesthesia and intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery Patients received postoperative pain control as per standard protocol Exclusion Criteria: Patients with chronic pain prior to cesarean delivery Unable to give pain score Receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery Receiving postoperative pain control beyond the standard protocol Patients with multiple pregnancy, placenta abruption, placenta accrete, postpartum hemorrhage Patients with psychotic disorder

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Other: No intervention|To collect data of pain score and opioid consumption of index and previous cesarean delivery|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prediction of pain score after cesarean delivery | To predict pain score of index cesarean delivery from previous cesarean delivery using pain score measured by verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). | January 2024 - December 2025 | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prediction of opioid consumption after cesarean delivery | To predict opioid consumption of index cesarean delivery from previous cesarean delivery based on 1. number and percentage of patients who required opioid for controlling postoperative pain, 2. MME (milligram morphine equivalent) per total patients and 3. MME per patients who received opioid | January 2024 - December 2025 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
cesarean delivery, opioid consumption, pain score
A Study of the Effect of Short-term Structured Psychological Care in Patients

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study explored the effects of short-term structured psychological care on the level of postoperative psychological resilience, stigma, anxiety and depression in patients with colorectal cancer colostomy.

Official Title
-----------------
A Study of the Effect of Short-term Structured Psychological Care on the Level of Postoperative Stigma in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Conditions
-----------------
Colorectal Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Routine Care
* Procedure: Short-term structured psychological Care


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: voluntary participation in the study and ability to cooperate with treatment and care; patients who were to undergo enterostomy; age ≥18 years; consciousness (being able to complete the questionnaire alone or able to answer the questions correctly); social impact scale (SIS) score ≥24. Exclusion Criteria: Critically ill and unable to cooperate with the study; Impaired cognitive function that affects communication; Patients with other organic diseases in combination.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Control group<br> | Procedure: Routine Care<br>* Routine care for patients undergoing colorectal cancer stoma<br>|
| Experimental: Experimental group<br> | Procedure: Short-term structured psychological Care<br>* Short-term structured psychological care for colorectal cancer stoma patients based on conventional care<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Anxiety of patients was assessed by Chinese version of the Mental Toughness Scale | Anxiety of patients was assessed by Chinese version of the Mental Toughness Scale | 1 month | 
| Anxiety of patients was assessed by the Social Impact Scale | Anxiety of patients was assessed by the Social Impact Scale | 1 month | 
| Anxiety of patients was assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | Anxiety of patients was assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | 1 month |
Pelvic Tilt Following Puerperium

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The slight anterior pelvic tilt is a physiological posture in healthy males and females, however, excessive anterior pelvic tilt is associated with different lumbopelvic discomfort either during gestation or after childbirth.

Detailed Description
-----------------
As pregnant women move from the 1st to the 3rd trimester, they exhibit a notable increase in the angle of pelvic tilting. This may explain the painful pelvic girdle syndrome during gestation which can last for several weeks postpartum. When women finish their 6 weeks of puerperium, it may be suspected to return in the pelvic tilting angle to its measurements prior to gestation.

Official Title
-----------------
Measurement of Pelvic Tilt 6 Weeks Post-Cesarean Delivery

Conditions
-----------------
Pelvic Obliquity

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: digital pelvic inclinometer


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Women who underwent cesarean delivery Women who were classified as having normal or overweight score on body mass index Women in their 6-12 weeks postpartum Exclusion Criteria: Women who underwent vaginal delivery Women who were obese on the body mass index Women with postpartum duration of less than 6 weeks or more than 12 weeks

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 34 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Group A<br>20 postpartum women who delivered by cesarean section | Device: digital pelvic inclinometer<br>* It is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring pelvic tilt angle<br>|
| Group B<br>20 females who did not experience pregnancy | Device: digital pelvic inclinometer<br>* It is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring pelvic tilt angle<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| pelvic tilt angle | angle between the line passing from the posterior and anterior superior iliac spines, and the horizontal plane | 6-12 weeks after Cesarean delivery | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| pelvic torsion | the calculated numerical degrees when the angle of pelvic tilt on the right side is substracted from its counterpart on the left side | 6-12 weeks after Cesarean delivery |
Hepatic Small Vessel Neoplasm

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Small-vessel hepatic tumor is a new tumor entity of vascular origin, described in 2016 by Gill et al, in a series of 17 patients. This rare lesion is difficult to diagnose on imaging because it shares a common radiological semiology with several other differential diagnoses ranging from benign hepatic angioma to more aggressive lesions such as angiosarcoma.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The aim of our study is to enable the imaging diagnosis of a new entity: small vessel hepatic tumor in order to improve diagnostic management.

Official Title
-----------------
Imaging of Small-vessel Liver Tumours

Conditions
-----------------
Hepatic Small Vessel Neoplasm

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Imaging


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Histological evidence of a small vessel hepatic tumor either on biopsy or surgical specimen Cross-sectional imaging before the biopsy or pre-operatively (CT, MRI) Exclusion Criteria: Patient under guardianship or curators
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Other: Imaging|Imaging data from patients with small-vessel liver tumours will be compared with histological data.|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Imaging findings | Aspect on US Ultrasound Scan (US) | 12 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pathological examination | tumors | 12 months | 
| Biology | bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase rate | 12 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Neoplasm, Vascular tumors, Hepatic imaging