Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Cannabis Use Disorder

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
There has been a considerable rise in cannabis consumption in recent years, with estimates of 200 million individual users globally. Importantly, 3% of these individuals have cannabis use disorder (CUD), with this prevalence increasing to 33% amongst regular users, making it one of the most common substances use disorders (SUDs) worldwide. CUD is associated with substantial health, societal, and economic costs, and worsening of other psychiatric disorders. Despite this clinical burden, effective treatment options are limited. No pharmacological treatments have emerged as clearly efficacious, and psychotherapeutic interventions have shown tempered results. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain-based approach in which alternating magnetic fields are applied to the scalp to induce electrical currents in cortical tissue. As it can modulate neural circuits implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, it is a promising brain-based approach in the treatment of addictions. Evidence has indicated its efficacy in reducing drug craving and consumption across numerous SUDs, although research into cannabis has been largely unexplored. Recently, a novel circular rTMS coil, the MagVenture MMC-140, has been developed with the capacity to modulate both the bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and insula, both of which are implicated in the neurocircuitry of craving and executive function. As such, it shows potential for CUD treatment. This proof-of-concept clinical trial will evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of a 4-week course of rTMS to the PFC/insula using MMC-140 as a treatment for CUD. Feasibility of both high frequency (HF; excitatory) and low frequency (LF; inhibitory) stimulation parameters will be evaluated. In addition, pre/post rTMS changes in cannabis use outcomes (e.g., consumption, craving, and withdrawal), executive function, and PFC/insula functional connectivity will be explored. By comprehensively investigating clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging effects of rTMS, this study could pave the way for the first brain-based intervention in CUD that could be widely adopted into clinical settings using a novel, cost-effective and accessible rTMS device.

Official Title
-----------------
Development of a Novel, Scalable, Neurobiologically-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder

Conditions
-----------------
Cannabis Use Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Must be deemed to have capacity to provide informed consent Age between 18 to 65 Diagnosis of cannabis use disorder according to the DSM-5 and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID for DSM-541) Report cannabis as the primary drug of concern, a frequent pattern of use (≥5 days per week), and a goal of reduction or abstinence of cannabis use CUDIT-R score ≥12 Marijuana Contemplation Ladder ≥7 Cannabis positive urine drug screen, with Narcochek baseline THC-COOH level of >150 ng/ml. On a stable regimen of their psychotropic medications for 14 days before enrolment. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or intending to be pregnant during the study Diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, or other active concurrent psychiatric disorder that is too unstable and may preclude safe participation in the trial as deemed by the PI. Substance use disorder other than cannabis or nicotine, that is of moderate severity or greater, or is the primary substance of concern based on the SCID for DSM-5 Known active seizure disorder, significant head injury with an imaging verified lesion Unstable medical illness Presence of cardiac pacemaker, intracranial implant, or metal in the cranium Participants taking > 2 mg lorazepam (or a benzodiazepine at an equivalent dose) or taking any anticonvulsant medication during treatment.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Participants will be randomized to one of two groups to receive either high-frequency (10 Hz) or low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS.
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: High-Frequency (HF)<br>10 Hz rTMS | Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation<br>* rTMS is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique that applies alternating magnetic fields to the scalp to induce electric currents in localized cortical tissue. The intervention (LF or HF rTMS) will be administered daily 5 days/week for 4 weeks, using the MagVenture MMC-140 circular coil, with the brain regions targeted as the bilateral prefrontal cortex and the insula.<br>* Other names: MagVenture MMC-140 Coil;|
| Active Comparator: Low-Frequency (LF)<br>1 Hz rTMS | Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation<br>* rTMS is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique that applies alternating magnetic fields to the scalp to induce electric currents in localized cortical tissue. The intervention (LF or HF rTMS) will be administered daily 5 days/week for 4 weeks, using the MagVenture MMC-140 circular coil, with the brain regions targeted as the bilateral prefrontal cortex and the insula.<br>* Other names: MagVenture MMC-140 Coil;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Feasibility of study completion as assessed by completion rates | Feasibility is determined by completion of the study and all associated study assessments, without withdrawing or being withdrawn from the study. Withdrawal from the study can be dropping out for any reason, including intolerability, serious adverse events, or inability to adhere to study procedures. | The timeframe is through study completion, beginning from baseline to end of rTMS treatment week 4, an average of 8 weeks, the event determined by withdrawal from the study. | 
| Tolerability of Intervention as assessed by adverse event reporting | This will be assessed through a side effect report at each treatment session. Safety monitoring will be implemented through the documentation and monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) using incidence tables by severity, relationship to treatment and baseline parameters. | The timeframe is through study completion, beginning from baseline to end of rTMS treatment week 4, an average of 8 weeks. The events being counts of adverse events or serious adverse events. | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cannabis Use | Determined through self-report on the Timeline Followback (TLFB). Endpoints of interest will include percentage of days per week using cannabis, number of use sessions per day, 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Semi-quantitative analysis of cannabis use will be obtained through a THC Pre-Dosage Test (Narcocheck ®, Villejuif, France) to confirm. | Baseline (pre-rTMS), Weekly (end of each week of rTMS), Follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS), up to a total time frame of 8 weeks. Events are counted as self reported instances of cannabis use on the Timeline Followback. | 
| Cannabis Craving | Changes in cannabis craving assessed through the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Minimum score is 3 and maximum score is 84. Higher scores indicate greater cannabis craving (worse outcome). | Baseline (pre-rTMS), Weekly (end of each week of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, Follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS), | 
| Cannabis Withdrawal | Changes in cannabis withdrawal symptoms assessed through the Marijuana Withdrawal Checklist (MWC) | Baseline (pre-rTMS), Weekly (end of each week of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, Follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS), | 
| Prefrontal cortex and Insula Connectivity | Assessed by seed-based resting state connectivity on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Seeds are defined as the medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the insula. Measurement will be of change in strength of connectivity between these seeds pre- to post-rTMS, and comparing between groups (high or low frequency stimulation). | Baseline (pre-rTMS), End of rTMS (end of treatment week 4 of rTMS) | 
| Depression symptoms | Changes in depression symptoms assessed through the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17). Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 52, higher scores indicate greater depression (worse outcome) | Baseline (pre-rTMS), Weekly (end of each week of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS), | 
| Anxiety symptoms | Changes in anxiety symptoms assessed through the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7). Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21, higher scores indicate greater anxiety (worse outcome). | Baseline (pre-rTMS), Weekly (end of each week of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS), | 
| Trail Making Test | Changes on a neuropsychological assessment for attention, speed, and mental flexibility. Part A and Part B. Measurement: number of seconds required to complete the task. • Higher scores reveal greater impairment. | Baseline (pre-rTMS), End of rTMS (end of treatment week 4 of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS) | 
| Digit Span | Changes on a neuropsychological assessment for working memory. Consists of 2 parts: Forwards and Backwards. Each item is scored 0, 1, or 2 points. (Depending on accuracy). • Lower scores reveal greater impairment. Minimum score 0. Maximum total score on Digit Span: 30 points | Baseline (pre-rTMS), End of rTMS (end of treatment week 4 of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS) | 
| Hopkins Verbal Learning Test | Changes on a neuropsychological assessment for working memory. Consists of 3 parts: A (free recall), B (delayed recall), C (recognition). Less number of words remembered indicates worse outcome. | Baseline (pre-rTMS), End of rTMS (end of treatment week 4 of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS) | 
| Continuous Performance Test | Changes on a neuropsychological assessment for sustained attention. Measurement & Scoring Categories: Correct Detection (number of times the client responded to the target stimulus. Higher rates of correct detections indicate better attentional capacity), reaction times (Amount of time between the presentation of the stimulus and the client's response), omission errors (Number of times the target was presented, but the client did not respond/click the mouse. High omission rates indicate distractibility to stimuli or a sluggish response), commission errors (Number of times the client responded but no target was presented. A fast reaction time and high commission error rate points to difficulties with impulsivity. A slow reaction time with high commission and omission errors, indicates inattention in general). | Baseline (pre-rTMS), End of rTMS (end of treatment week 4 of rTMS), an average of 8 weeks from baseline assessment to end of rTMS, follow-up (4-weeks post-rTMS) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Neuroimaging, Substance Use Disorder, Prefrontal Cortex, Insula, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cannabis