A Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® Implantable Ports

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to evaluate performance and safety of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® implantable ports allowing repeated and prolonged access to the venous system for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, antiviral drugs, parenteral nutrition, and for blood transfusion or blood derivatives transfusion.

Official Title
-----------------
A Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of POLYSITE® and SEESITE® Implantable Ports

Conditions
-----------------
Veinous, Chemotherapy, Antibiotics, Antiviral Drugs, Parenteral Nutrition, Blood Transfusion, Blood Derivatives Transfusion, PMCF Study

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Implantation of veinous access ports


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Adult and paediatric population Patient who received the implantation of any POLYSITE® or SEESITE® implantable port referenced in the Annex 1 of the current protocol between 1-JAN-2018 and 31-DEC-2020 Exclusion Criteria: Patient who refused the data collection according to GDPR regulation applicable in France Patient who received the implantation of another device than those presented in Annex 1 of the current protocol.
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Device: Implantation of veinous access ports|The surgeon, anaesthetist and interventional radiologist should be thoroughly familiar with the surgical procedure, instruments, and device characteristics prior to performing the implantation. The nurse has also to be familiar with the implantable port since he/she intervenes in it at the time of the Huber needle puncture and solution injection.|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Performance : success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port. | evaluation of the success of the insertion and placement of the implantable port. | Peri-procedure | 
| Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess by Radiological endpoint | percentage of patients with correct insertion into venous access objectively assessed via radiography, ECG or echography measurement | Peri-procedure | 
| Associate Performance : correct device insertion assess Clinical endpoint | percentage of patients with correct placement objectively assessed by clinical observation | Peri-procedure | 
| Per-procedure Safety | evaluation of the safety of the implantable ports | 30 Days | 
| Associated Safety : rate of complications | measurement of the rate of complications reported during the short-term period of 30 days after the implantation date. As example, the following short-term complications will be looked at: infections, bleeding and hematoma, pneumothorax, hemothorax and pleural effusion, pain. | 30 days | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Performance : evaluation of the device performance | percentage of patients with correct device insertion by the general surgeon, anaesthetist, or the radiologist. The insertion could be done under Echo or under fluoroscopy or ECG | 5 years | 
| device failure | measurement of the rate of device failure throughout the study until the device is removed from the patient's body. The device failures are defined as mechanical dysfunctions (catheter fracture, occlusion, and port-pocket dehiscence, pinch-off, embolization, leak, port/catheter disconnection, drug extravasation, mal-position, flip-over, migration, local venous thrombosis, etc…). | 5 years | 
| Safety: perioperative time | duration between the implantation procedure and the first use of the implantable port | 5 years | 
| Safety FU period: Device Failure Removal | the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication.the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable port removal. If the removal is related to a device failure or a complication related to the device, the patient's safety will be followed until the resolution of the complication. | 5 years | 
| Safety Long Term period: Device Failure Removal | the complications will be followed up to 30 days after the implantable duration starting after the first 30 days after the implantation procedure and up to device removal, or patient death, or lost to follow-up, depending on what event comes first in the patient's medical chart. Study timepoints have been defined as 6-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 12-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure, 24-months Followup after the Implantation procedure and 36-months Follow-up after the Implantation procedure. | 5 years | 
| Safety Long Term period: complications | measurement of the rate of complications reported during the whole study and at the defined study timepoints. As example, the following long-term complications will be looked at: infections, inflammation, skin disorders, catheter-related venous thrombosis, pinch-off. | 5 years | 
| Emergent Risks | AEs collection | 5 years |