Autologous BMAC vs Saline and LAC + LP-PRP vs Saline Evaluations in Knee OA

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
ABLE OA is a Health Canada authorized (phase II/III) trial [Control #: 263591]. A multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled adaptive trial to evaluate the efficacy of two minimally manipulated autologous cellular preparations i) bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection; and, ii) combined lipoaspirate concentrate (LAC) and leukocyte poor (LP) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). BMAC, LAC, and LP-PRP will be processed using the Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies (BCT) SmartPrep® System, a functionally closed system for the clinical preparation of cellular concentrates. Patient-reported outcome measures will be collected using web- or paper-based questionnaires administered at baseline (pre-injection) as well as at 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection). Blood, synovial fluid, and urine samples will be collected at baseline pre-injection and 6 months post-injection only.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Trial interventions will occur in two independent studies under a single protocol where each experimental treatment will be compared to a placebo control. Our primary hypothesis is that BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP injection is 35% more effective than placebo saline injection control in terms of response rates in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores as measured by their difference. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of an intra-articular injection of BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP in patients with knee OA by comparing each of the two treatments to a placebo saline injection control arm. Efficacy will be measured by a pain intensity improvement of a minimum of 2 points in NPRS scores at 6 months after injection relative to baseline. The study endpoint is 6 months post-injection. KEY SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy measured by improvements in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function activities of daily living (ADL) subscale scores at 6 months after injection relative to baseline by comparing each of the treatment (BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP) arm to a placebo saline control arm. OTHER SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if an injection of BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP into the knee joint shows greater improvements in other pain outcomes (including KOOS pain) compared to placebo injection at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection relative to baseline. To evaluate the safety of BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP injection into the knee joint compared to placebo injection. Adverse events will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection, and deleterious effects on the joint will be assessed by X-ray at 6 months post-injection only. To evaluate the health profile and overall self-rated health status of patients in treatment and placebo arms at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection relative to baseline. To evaluate overall patient satisfaction in treatment and placebo arms at 6 months post-injection. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: To determine the correlation between changes in NPRS/KOOS pain scores and KOOS ADL function at 6 months relative to baseline and the heterogeneity in: the cellular composition and soluble factors in BMAC, LAC and PRP autologous cellular preparations [in BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP groups only] the levels of local and systemic immune cell and inflammatory profiles of patients (based on synovial fluid, blood, and urine readouts) [in BMAC or LAC + LP-PRP and placebo groups] A total of approximately 84 eligible participants in each study will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio, which allows for 42 participants per group (treatment vs. placebo). This sample size considers a potential drop-out rate of 10% for each study. Three recruitment centres (Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), University Health Network (UHN); Women's College Hospital (WCH); Cleveland Clinic Canada (CCC)) and one treatment centre (TWH, UHN) will be involved in these two studies. Stratification will occur by centre, baseline NPRS of 4-6 (moderate pain) or 7-10 (severe pain), and KL grade of 2 (minimal OA) or 3 (moderate OA). Additionally, the need to re-estimate the required sample size will be evaluated using the information available at interim. At the interim analysis, contingent on observed response rates and corresponding statistical signal, the required sample size may increase, ranging from 100 to 288 patients in total for each of the two studies.

Official Title
-----------------
Intra-Articular Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate vs Placebo Injection and Lipoaspirate Concentrate With Leukocyte-Poor Platelet Rich Plasma vs Placebo Injection Evaluations for Treatment of Knee OsteoArthritis: The ABLE OA Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Osteoarthritis, Knee

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Biological: Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC): Minimally manipulated, concentrated autologous cellular preparation
* Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for BMAC)
* Biological: Lipoaspirate + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAC + LP-PRP): Minimally manipulated, concentrated autologous cellular preparations
* Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for LAC+LP-PRP)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female at least 30 years of age at the time of screening Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and visit schedules and able to follow oral and written instructions Signed consent for study participation Baseline NPRS ≥ 4 points Unilateral, symptomatic, chronic knee pain KL grade 2 or 3 knee OA based on standing knee X-ray assessment Body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: Approved anti-inflammatory therapy injections (corticosteroid, Synvisc, PRP, nSTRIDE-Autologous Protein Solution) within the previous 6 months in the knee Major axial deviation (varus >10°, valgus >10°) Any concomitant knee lesion causing pain or effusion (i.e., ligamentous or meniscal injury, osteochondral lesion) Presence of clinically observed active infection in the index knee Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis, or arthritis secondary to other inflammatory diseases; chondrocalcinosis, Paget's disease, or villonodular synovitis Diagnosed with leukemia or other hematologic cancers, known presence of metastatic malignant cells, or ongoing or planned chemotherapeutic treatment Presence of venous or lymphatic stasis in the index leg A history of local anesthetic allergy Medical conditions such as hemophilia or other blood clotting disorders Arthroscopic knee surgery within the previous 6 months Daily opioid use for the past 3 months, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 1 week of the procedure, unable to hold anti-platelet medications Use of systemic corticosteroids for treatment of a chronic medical condition within the past 3 months Immunosuppression or acute infective processes Study Treatment Eligibility: For Study 1: Inability to tolerate the bone marrow aspiration procedure resulting in insufficient collection of BMA (<60 mL) For Study 2: Inability to tolerate the lipoaspiration procedure resulting in insufficient collection of LA (<40 mL)

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 30 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: STUDY 1 (N=74): All patients will undergo a bone marrow aspiration. A BMAC injection [Arm A, n=37] will be compared to a saline injection [Arm C, n=37]. STUDY 2 (N=74): All patients will undergo blood collection and lipoaspiration. A LAC injection followed by LP-PRP injection [Arm B, n=37] will be compared to two consecutive saline injections [Arm D, n=37].
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: For STUDY 1 (ARM A): Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC)<br>This group will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of BMAC (a single dose of concentrated cell suspension of 9 mL or less) | Biological: Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC): Minimally manipulated, concentrated autologous cellular preparation<br>* Participants will undergo a bone marrow aspiration to collect 60 mL of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) from the posterior iliac spine i.e., ipsilateral and/or contralateral iliac crest. The components required to collect and process 60 mL of BMA to 9 mL (or less) of BMAC are provided in one BMAC2-60-01 Procedure Pack (Terumo BCT). After processing using the SmartPrep® System, BMAC is injected into the osteoarthritic knee joint (Arm A, Study 1).<br>|
| Placebo Comparator: For STUDY 1 (ARM C): Saline Injection<br>This group will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of saline solution (9 mL) | Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for BMAC)<br>* Participants will undergo a bone marrow aspiration to collect 60 mL of BMA from the posterior iliac spine i.e., ipsilateral and/or contralateral iliac crest. However, 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) Baxter or equivalent is injected into the osteoarthritic knee joint (Arm C, Study 1).<br>|
| Experimental: For STUDY 2 (ARM B): Lipoaspirate + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAC + LP-PRP)<br>This group will undergo a blood collection/lipoaspiration and receive an ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of LAC (a single dose of concentrated cell suspension of 9 mL or less) followed by LP-PRP (a single dose of concentrated cell suspension of 2 mL or less) | Biological: Lipoaspirate + Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LAC + LP-PRP): Minimally manipulated, concentrated autologous cellular preparations<br>* Participants will undergo a lipoaspiration to collect 40 mL of lipoaspirate (LA) from subcutaneous adipose tissue. The components required to process 40 mL of LA to 9 mL (or less) of LAC are provided in one AdiPrep® Adipose Transfer System Procedure Pack (Terumo BCT). Participants will also undergo a blood draw to collect 32 mL of whole blood from the antecubital fossa. The components required to process 32 mL of venous blood to PRP followed by processing to yield 2 mL of LP-PRP are provided in one Platelet Concentrate Procedure Pack and one LP-10 Clear Prep Procedure Pack (Terumo BCT). After processing using the SmartPrep® System, LAC is injected first followed immediately by LP-PRP into the osteoarthritic knee joint (Arm B, Study 2).<br>|
| Placebo Comparator: For STUDY 2 (ARM D): Saline Injection<br>This group will undergo a blood collection/lipoaspiration and receive ultrasound guided intra-articular injections of saline solution (9 mL followed by 2 mL) | Other: Saline (Placebo Comparator for LAC+LP-PRP)<br>* Participants will undergo a lipoaspiration to collect 40 mL of LA and a blood draw to collect 32 mL of whole blood. However, 0.9% of sodium chloride (NaCl) Baxter or equivalent is injected twice into the osteoarthritic knee joint (Arm D, Study 2).<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pain Level Changes. Differences in response rates between groups (treatments vs placebos) at 6-months (end of study) compared to baseline. Response is based on an improvement of 2 units or more in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). | Pain intensity will be measured by the NPRS. The score ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating No Pain and 10 Worst Imaginable Pain. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Changes. Differences in mean change of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale scores between groups (treatments vs placebos) at 6-months (end of study) compared to baseline. | KOOS was originally developed in 1995 by Ewa M Roos and colleagues. The KOOS was developed as an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index with the purpose of evaluating short- and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and OA. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in Daily Living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 
| Additional Pain Level Changes. Mean NPRS subscale change score at 6 months relative to baseline in treatment groups compared to placebo groups. | See above for description of NPRS. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 
| Additional Pain Level Changes. Mean KOOS pain subscale change score at 6 months relative to baseline in treatment groups compared to placebo groups. | See above for description of KOOS. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 
| Health-Related Quality of Life Changes. Mean utility and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) change scores at 6 months (end of study) relative to baseline in treatment groups compared to placebo groups. | EQ-5D-5L is a commonly used generic preference-based health-related QOL measure. It is a multi-attribute instrument, which considers five dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Respondents are asked to rate their health today on each dimension. Each dimension has five levels of severity i.e., no problems (level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (level 5). There are 3,125 possible health states defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health). The health states are converted into a single index 'utility' score using a scoring algorithm. There is also a VAS, which is used as a quantitative measure of overall health status i.e., 0 represents the worst health you can imagine and 100 represents the best health you can imagine. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 
| Safety. Proportion of cumulative adverse events (AEs) at 6 months post-injection in treatment groups compared to placebo groups. | AEs will either be sought by the clinician via non-directive questioning, by clinical exam at scheduled visits, and/or detected when volunteered by the study participant during or between visits. At the 6-month visit, deleterious effects on the joint will also be assessed by X-ray of the knee. AEs beyond the 6-month visit will be addressed according to standard clinical management practices. A statement that a patient had no AEs also constitutes a safety assessment. | baseline (pre-injection) and 3, 6 and 12 months (post-injection) | 
| Treatment Satisfaction. Percent satisfaction at 6 months in treatment groups compared to placebo groups. | This will be evaluated with a single question with five response options (very dissatisfied; somewhat dissatisfied; neither dissatisfied or satisfied; somewhat satisfied; very satisfied). | 6 months (post-injection) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
placebo, intra-articular injection, autologous therapy, bone marrow aspirate, lipoaspirate, platelet-rich plasma, leukocyte-poor, pain