Patient-reported Outcomes in Bladder Cancer

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes with alert algorithm will be tested in a randomized trial in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemo- or immunotherapy. The clinical endpoints will be: Quality of life Completion of treatment Hospital admission Dose reductions Survival

Detailed Description
-----------------
Bladder cancer is in Europe the 4th most incident cancer among men and the 7th most frequent cause of cancer death. Many patients will receive chemo- or immunotherapy in either the neoadjuvant setting or for recurrent or metastatic disease. The registration and handling of side effect is crucial in bladder cancer treatment, since the missing identification and insufficient treatment of such can lead to incomplete treatment and thereby decreased effect. It is therefore of utmost importance to develop new tools which can increase identification of the side effects and improve treatment to secure the best life expectancies for these patients. This study will in a randomized trial using PRO-CTCAE™ questions, EORTC QLQ-C30 + QLQ-BLM30 in one arm versus standard procedure regarding side effect registration and handling in the other arm, test the effect of electronic reporting of side-effects and quality of life with a specifically developed alert-algorithm. Both study arms will include chemotherapy and immunotherapy patients as standard therapy.

Official Title
-----------------
Patient-reported Outcomes in Bladder Cancer; a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial: The iBLAD Study

Conditions
-----------------
Bladder Cancer, Urothelial Carcinoma

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Electronic patient-reported outcomes


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Urothelial carcinoma Initiating chemo- or immunotherapy No serious cognitive deficits Read and understand Danish Assigned electronic communication with health services with E-boks Exclusion Criteria: None

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| No Intervention: Standard of care<br>This arm will continue standard procedure regarding side effect registration and handling | |
| Experimental: PRO<br>This arm will be assigned to intervention by weekly electronic reporting of side effects and quality of life. A specifically developed alert-algorithm will in real-time guide both patient and alert clinical staff if symptoms are increasing or quality of life is deteriorating. | Device: Electronic patient-reported outcomes<br>* Weekly reporting of patient-reported outcomes for closer contact between patient and clinic between treatment cycles.<br>* Other names: Alerts to clinical staff;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rate of completion of treatment | Registration of whether patients complete the planned treatment and if not if the cessation was preventable. | Within the first 6 months of treatment | 
| Hospital admission | Registration of whether patients by closer contact to clinic between visits can decrease the rate of hospital admissions for preventable causes during treatment. | Within the first 6 months of treatment | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Quality of life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 (general quality of life questionnaire) and EORTC QLQ-BLM30(quality of life questionnaire specifically for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients) | Registration of differences in quality of life between the two arms in the study. EORTC QLQ-C30(scale range 0-100, a higher score indicating better quality of life) and QLQ-BLM30(scale range 0-100, a higher score indicating increase in symptom burden) will be used for as quality of life measurement. The scores will be presented graphically in separate figures. The EORTC QLQ-BLM30 cannot be applied without the QLQ-C30, hence the aggregation of measures in the present outcome measure category. Differences between the two arms will be tested using t-test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). | Within the first 6 months of treatment | 
| Overall survival measured from time of study initiation to death | Differences in median overall survival and analysis of survival differences between the intervention-arm and the standard of care arm. The analysis will be carried out with log-rank analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. The analysis will be carried out separately for chemotherapy and immunotherapy recipients. | Analysis will be made up to 2 years after study completion | 
| Dose-reductions | Registration of differences in number of dose reductions of chemotherapy between the two arm in the study. | Within the first 6 months of treatment | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Patient-reported outcomes, Electronic reporting of symptoms, Immunotherapy, Chemotherapy