IMPACCT for Kids' Care

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Health insurance is important for children. Public insurance programs are available to many children, but some families report being confused about how to get and keep this insurance. Community Health Centers (CHCs) can help families get and keep health insurance for their children. The investigators will work with families, policy makers, and community health care providers and staff to develop and test new computer health information technology (IT) tools to help health care clinics find pediatric patients in need of insurance and communicate with their families about public insurance programs. These tools will be based on technologies currently used to help patients and clinics manage chronic diseases. The investigators will test the tools by comparing four clinics using the tools and four clinics not using the tools. The investigators will look to see if children in the clinics using the tools are more likely to have health insurance and also more likely to receive certain health care services, compared to children in the clinics without such tools. The investigators will also look at health insurance rates and health care services for a larger population of Oregon children.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Summary of protocol changes made: Changes to eligibility criteria. We changed patient eligibility to include all pediatric patients through age 19 with >=1 clinical visit in the study period. These decisions were based on: 1) at age 20, individuals are no longer eligible for children's Medicaid or CHIP in Oregon; 2) identification of PCP assignment was difficult in the EHR. Added second comparison group/study arm. In the intervention clinics, the tools were used on a smaller number of pediatric patients than anticipated, and there were significant demographic differences between intervention and control site patients, despite the clinics being matched. Thus we added a second comparison group, within-clinic comparison patients as pediatric patients with >=1 visit at an intervention clinic in the study period but on whom the tools were NOT used. This provided a comparison group that accounted for clinic-level effects and was more demographically similar to the intervention patients on whom tools were used. Revision of Aim 3 - CHIPRA recommended care assessment. We did not pursue assessment of CHIPRA quality care measures due to 1) limited follow-up time due to the need to implement iterative modifications to the study HIT tools, and 2) the tools were used on a smaller set of pediatric patients than anticipated, thus we had a very limited denominator for these analyses.

Official Title
-----------------
Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools (IMPACCT) for Kids' Care

Conditions
-----------------
Insurance Status/Stability

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Health insurance outreach IT tools


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: age 0-19 established patient (>=1 clinical visit at a study clinic in the assessment period) Exclusion Criteria: age > 19 not an established patient

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Maximum Age: 19 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Intervention patients<br>Community Health Centers that implemented health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients on whom tools were used | Other: Health insurance outreach IT tools<br>* IT tools that support Community Health Centers in children's health insurance outreach efforts (insurance outreach IT tools), adapted from tools proven to support chronic disease management.<br>|
| Within-clinic comparison patients<br>Community Health Centers that implemented health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients on whom tools were not used | |
| Control clinic comparison patients<br>Matched Community Health Centers that did not implement health insurance outreach IT tools: active patients | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Percent of Study Period Covered by Medicaid | Percent of total days in 22-month assessment period that each child was covered by Medicaid insurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources). | 6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation | 
| Proportion of Patients Who Gained Medicaid Coverage | Proportion of participants who gained Medicaid coverage after a period of uninsurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources) and who had partial coverage during the study period (i.e., patients with 100% coverage were not 'eligible' to gain coverage). | 6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation | 
| Proportion of Patients Who Lost Medicaid Coverage | Proportion of participants who lost Medicaid coverage after a period of insurance. Assessed using state administrative records linked to EHR data; this outcome was assessed among the subset of participants with a Medicaid ID (and thus could be linked between the two data sources) and who had partial coverage during the study period (i.e., patients with 100% coverage were not 'eligible' to lose coverage). | 6 months pre- through 16 months post-tool implementation | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
United States, Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services/organization & administration*, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Community Health Centers/organization & administration, Community Health Centers/standards, Electronic Health Records, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Services Accessibility/economics, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Insurance Coverage, Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data, Insurance Coverage/trends, Insurance, Health, Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence, Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data, Insurance, Health/trends, Logistic Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Medicaid, Medicaid/statistics & numerical data, Medicaid/trends, Medicaid/utilization, Medically Uninsured, Medicare/statistics & numerical data, Medicare/trends, Medicare/utilization, Multivariate Analysis, Oregon, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Patient-Centered Care, Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence, Pediatrics/standards, Population Surveillance/methods, Primary Health Care/economics, Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence, Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult