Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1)

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1).

Detailed Description
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to compare LRH (or robotic-assisted) and ARH in patients with cervical cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1), by a multicenter stratified randomized controlled study, mainly including the following aspects: To compare the differences in PFS and OS between patients receiving LRH and ARH. To investigate whether PFS and OS in LRH can be improved by more rigorous specification of surgical details (including tumor-free principles and standard surgical scopes). To assess postoperative complications and quality of survival.

Official Title
-----------------
A Multicenter Noninferior Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1)

Conditions
-----------------
Cervical Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy
* Other: Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical diagnosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix, adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma (Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1). Age ≥ 21 years and ≤ 70 years. Surgery type B and C (refer to Q-M surgical staging) Normal range of liver and kidney function and blood count (specific details below) Hemoglobin > 60g/L Platelets > 70*109/L Leukocytes > 3*109/L Creatinine < 50mg/dL Transaminase abnormal indicators ≤ 3 Maximum value of transaminases not exceeding 3 times the corresponding normal value. No history of other malignancies. Non-pregnancy. Physical strength classification: Karnofsky score ≥ 60; Subjects voluntarily joined the study, signed the informed consent form, were compliant and cooperated with the follow-up. No psychiatric disorders and other serious immune system disorders (e.g. lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, HIV infection, etc.) (Note: Maximum diameter measurement of cervical lesions is based on PET-CT, or CT, or MRI) Exclusion Criteria: Those who are contraindicated for various surgeries and cannot undergo surgery. Patients who have received pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy irradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer. Patients with recurrent cervical cancer Patients with CT, MRI or PET-CT suggesting suspicious metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes with maximum diameter >2cm after further improvement of preoperative examination.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 21 Years
Maximum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: 1<br>the group of LRH | Other: Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy<br>* Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.<br>|
| Active Comparator: 2<br>the group of ARH | Other: Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy<br>* Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| the rate of PFS at 5 years | The curves of PFS at 5 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to test the above hypothesis, the 5-year PFS rate difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the comparison between the two groups will be estimated. | 5 years from surgery | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| the rate of OS at 5 years | Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% CI for the effect of treatment on the 5-year OS rate. | 5 years from surgery | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Cervical Cancer, Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy, Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy