Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma on Knee Cartilage Injury

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
To analyze the effectiveness of intra-articular injection of autologous PRP on knee cartilage repair and evaluating functional recovery of the knee joint in knee cartilage injury patients.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Recent studies have shown that platelets, which contain a large number of cytokines and growth factors, can be beneficial in inflammatory response and postoperative bleeding, infection, bone formation, injury, muscle strain, and soft tissue healing. Platelets release a plethora of biologically active proteins to aggregate macrophages, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and osteoblasts, thereby promoting degradation and clearing necrotic tissue, thus further activating wound healing. In fact, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is now used clinically to promote cartilage repair. By retrieving the Web of Science, a study by Havva et al. reported the clinical use of autologous PRP in 82 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis with good outcomes. However, the clinical applications of this treatment have not been adequately investigated in randomized controlled trials. Given this, additional studies on the exact efficacy of this treatment are indispensible. Three similar trial protocols to the current trial include 'Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Platelet Rich Plasma (NCT02365142)', 'PRP vs HA Intra-articular Knee Injections for Cartilage Defects (NCT02012530)', and 'Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhanced With PRP Versus PRP In OA Knee (MSCPRPOAK) (NCT01985633)'. In these trial protocols, knee injury extent and treatment success were assessed by Osteoarthritis Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score as outcome measures. However, there are several differences in the inclusion criteria and randomization of these trials in comparison with the current trial protocol. Since autologous PRP predominantly functions to relieve pain and inhibit inflammatory responses, clinical injection of autologous PRP for cartilage injury can stimulate chondrocyte growth and matrix metabolism. Existing evidence has shown that autologous PRP can increase type II collagen production and reduce apoptosis in chondrocytes when combined with autologous bone marrow-MSCs. Furthermore, PRP can improve cartilage degeneration and inhibit the development of osteoarthritis (OA) when combined with hydrogel microspheres. Accordingly, the clinical use of autologous PRP can alleviate the symptoms of OA, promote recovery of motor function, and ultimately improve patient quality of life. To date, the clinical use of low-dose autologous PRP has been reported to alleviate pain at the injury site in the treatment of articular cartilage injury, and achieve cartilage repair and proliferation by releasing growth factors that promote extracellular matrix synthesis and vascular reconstruction. However, the clinical applications of autologous PRP have not been systemically reported in randomized controlled clinical trials, leading to a lack of objective evidence on its effectiveness.

Official Title
-----------------
Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma on Knee Cartilage Injury: a Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Clinical Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Cartilage Injury

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: autologous platelet-rich plasma
* Drug: normal saline


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Knee cartilage injury Having normal and stable joint motion but no deformity Focal cartilage defects confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Outerbridge classification III/IV with a defect size < 10 cm2 graded as Outerbridge II at maximum Focal articular cartilage injury in the knee 14-55 years of age Provision of signed informed consent to participate in the trial Exclusion Criteria: Poor general condition Blood diseases Use of local hormone treatment within 3 months before the trial Bleeding tendency Drug addiction, including anesthetic, alcohol and poison Inflammatory arthropathy, including specific and non-specific arthritis and severe osteoarthritis Contagious viral infection Metabolic diseases, such as gout and rheumatism Pregnant or lactating, or planning to become pregnant within 1 year after the initial registration Unable to cooperate with rehabilitation therapy because of psychological/mental disorders

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 14 Years
Maximum Age: 55 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: autologous platelet-rich plasma group<br>The patients with knee cartilage injury were randomized to the intra-articular injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma group. | Drug: autologous platelet-rich plasma<br>* The patients with knee cartilage injury were randomized to the intra-articular injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma group.<br>|
| Experimental: normal saline group<br>The patients with knee cartilage injury were randomized to the normal saline group. | Drug: normal saline<br>* The patients with knee cartilage injury were randomized to the normal saline group.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lysholm score | To assess functional recovery of the knee joint. Lysholm score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better knee joint function. A score <70 indicates damage to the knee joint function. | at 3 months after final injection | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score | To used for assessing functional recovery of the knee joint. Higher scores indicate better recovery. | at 3 months after final injection | 
| Numerical rating scale score | To assess pain relief of the knee joint. The numerical rating scale score ranges from 0-10, with a score of 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating intense pain. | changes of month 1, month 2 and month 3 after initial injection, and month 3 after final injection |