Testing Informed Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Lung cancer screening rates are very low despite the fact that lung cancer screening could save many lives. People need to understand the risks and benefits to screening as well as their own beliefs about screening. This study builds an intervention in real world primary care that will help people make the right decision for them as well as help people to quit smoking. Interventions like this are needed to improve the screening rate and reduce death from lung cancer, which is the leading cancer killer.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Lung cancer screening rates in the United States are very low- just 3.3% in 2010 and 3.9% in 2015. There is a critical need to develop and implement effective strategies to engage high-risk patients in a coordinated program of lung cancer screening, which includes shared-decision making. The investigators proposed to modify and expand a shared decision- counseling intervention previously developed in one primary care practice. The investigators measured lung cancer screening in our intervention group compared to a propensity-matched usual care cohort. The investigators compared patients recruited to patients who are not in order to identify potential sources of disparity in future work and the investigators developed a more intense smoking cessation component. Model interventions for shared-decision making in clinical practice are needed across a wide range of diseases and decisions.

Official Title
-----------------
Testing Informed Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening

Conditions
-----------------
Lung Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Shared Decision Making


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Current or former smoker Greater than or equal to 30 pack years smoking Exclusion Criteria: Prior CT in last year Quit smoking greater than 15 years ago Current diagnosis of lung cancer

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 55 Years
Maximum Age: 78 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Phone-delivered decision-counseling program for shared decision making in lung cancer screening<br>All individuals who are eligible for lung cancer screening according to USPSTF criteria were invited to participate in the study and all patients who accepted the invitation and consented were slated to receive the intervention which was a phone-delivered on line decision-counseling program (DCP) and there was no one randomized or enrolled into a control group, nor was anyone randomized or enrolled into a usual care group. | Behavioral: Shared Decision Making<br>* Telephone delivered non-persuasive shared decision-making for lung cancer screening.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of Patients Who Received a Low Dose CT Scan of the Chest | Percentage of individuals who have evidence of a low-dose CT scan of the chest in their electronic medical record at 1 year post intervention, as ascertained by chart audit by research assistance. | 1 year |