tDCS, Moral Decision-Making, fMRI

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Morality is the social rule about appropriateness of the behavior, containing concepts of justice, fairness, and rights. Previous studies suggested that the activation of right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) should be involved in mental state reasoning in moral cognition. Implicit moral attitude, which reflects people's fundamental beliefs about right and wrong, could be assessed by implicit association test on moral scenarios (mIAT), as indicated by the D scores. According to our previous findings, we postulate that, during moral decision-making, the high D group would have less rTPJ involvement and the low D group would have more. Here we applied tDCS, a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, to modulate cortical excitability in rTPJ. Based on our postulation, we divided participants into high D and low D group and hypothesized that tDCS over rTPJ would modulate the behavior depending on the group. The results revealed that, in aspect of mIAT, implicit moral attitude could be modulated differently depending on the group via tDCS over rTPJ. In addition, hemodynamic response within rTPJ showed a main effect of tDCS while carrying out the helping behavior. In conclusion, these findings indicated that tDCS over rTPJ could modulate the implicit moral attitude as well as the rTPJ activity during moral action.

Official Title
-----------------
The Role of Implicit Attitude in the tDCS Modulation on Moral Decision-Making

Conditions
-----------------
Morality

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: transCranial direct current stimulation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: healthy volunteers, are all ethnic Chinese, right-handed, and aged between 20 to 30 years old Exclusion Criteria: any history of psychiatry or neurological disorders (e.g., dementia, seizures), head injury, and alcohol or substance abuse

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 20 Years
Maximum Age: 30 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| anodal<br>For the active stimulation, which are anodal and cathodal tDCS, a constant current of 1 mA was delivered through 35 cm2 electrode for 20 minutes with fade-in and fade-out of 10 seconds, producing a current density of 0.029 mA/cm2. During anodal tDCS, the anode was placed over right temporoparietal junction, and the cathode was placed over left supraorbital area. | Device: transCranial direct current stimulation<br>* In the present study, we applied DC Brain Stimulator Plus to stimulate right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). The target electrode was placed over the location of rTPJ; on the other hand, the return electrode was placed over the left supraorbital area. That is, during anodal tDCS, the anode was placed over CP6, and the cathode was placed over left supraorbital area; conversely, during cathodal tDCS, the cathode was placed over CP6, and the anode was placed over left supraorbital area. For the active stimulation, which are anodal and cathodal tDCS, a constant current of 1 mA was delivered through 35 cm2 electrode for 20 minutes with fade-in and fade-out of 10 seconds, producing a current density of 0.029 mA/cm2. On the other hand, same fade-in, fade-out, and current density were applied for the sham stimulation, but the duration of current-delivering only last 35 seconds. Therefore, participants could feel the skin sensation but did not have the after-effects of tDCS.<br>|
| cathodal<br>For the active stimulation, which are anodal and cathodal tDCS, a constant current of 1 mA was delivered through 35 cm2 electrode for 20 minutes with fade-in and fade-out of 10 seconds, producing a current density of 0.029 mA/cm2. During cathodal tDCS, the cathode was placed over right temporoparietal junction, and the anode was placed over left supraorbital area. | Device: transCranial direct current stimulation<br>* In the present study, we applied DC Brain Stimulator Plus to stimulate right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). The target electrode was placed over the location of rTPJ; on the other hand, the return electrode was placed over the left supraorbital area. That is, during anodal tDCS, the anode was placed over CP6, and the cathode was placed over left supraorbital area; conversely, during cathodal tDCS, the cathode was placed over CP6, and the anode was placed over left supraorbital area. For the active stimulation, which are anodal and cathodal tDCS, a constant current of 1 mA was delivered through 35 cm2 electrode for 20 minutes with fade-in and fade-out of 10 seconds, producing a current density of 0.029 mA/cm2. On the other hand, same fade-in, fade-out, and current density were applied for the sham stimulation, but the duration of current-delivering only last 35 seconds. Therefore, participants could feel the skin sensation but did not have the after-effects of tDCS.<br>|
| sham (as a control condition)<br>same fade-in, fade-out, and current density were applied for the sham stimulation, but the duration of current-delivering only last 35 seconds. | Device: transCranial direct current stimulation<br>* In the present study, we applied DC Brain Stimulator Plus to stimulate right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). The target electrode was placed over the location of rTPJ; on the other hand, the return electrode was placed over the left supraorbital area. That is, during anodal tDCS, the anode was placed over CP6, and the cathode was placed over left supraorbital area; conversely, during cathodal tDCS, the cathode was placed over CP6, and the anode was placed over left supraorbital area. For the active stimulation, which are anodal and cathodal tDCS, a constant current of 1 mA was delivered through 35 cm2 electrode for 20 minutes with fade-in and fade-out of 10 seconds, producing a current density of 0.029 mA/cm2. On the other hand, same fade-in, fade-out, and current density were applied for the sham stimulation, but the duration of current-delivering only last 35 seconds. Therefore, participants could feel the skin sensation but did not have the after-effects of tDCS.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Justice Sensitivity Inventory | Justice Sensitivity Inventory (JSI) is a self-report questionnaire which consists of four perspectives of justice sensitivity: victim, observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator (Schmitt, Baumert, Gollwitzer, & Maes, 2010; Schmitt, Gollwitzer, Maes, & Arbach, 2005). Each perspective contains ten descriptions, and participants would answer on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (exactly). Justice sensitivity reflects how people react to injustice and can be used to predict justice-related emotion and behavior (Baumert, Rothmund, Thomas, Gollwitzer, & Schmitt, 2013). | 10 minutes | 
| Morality Implicit Association Test | Implicit moral attitude was assessed by morality implicit association test (mIAT) in present study. The test was adapted from Implicit Association Test (IAT) developed by Greenwald and colleagues (1998). It measures the strength of the association 10 between target concepts and their associated attributes. In mIAT, target concepts were presented by morally good and morally bad clips, and attributes were presented by positive and negative words. | 15 minutes | 
| Moral Action Task | To verify the modulation of rTPJ activity via tDCS and to examine whether this modulation would alter people's moral behavior, participants would take the perspective of the active role while viewing moral scenarios in the MRI scanner. Forty-five dynamic visual stimuli from previous research were validated and applied in the Moral Action Task. Each animation consists of three still images with the respective duration of 1000ms, 200ms, and 200ms. These animations contain three kinds of moral scenarios: (1) a person who is taking an action to physically harm one another (perpetrating behavior); (2) a person who is alleviating the physical pain which the other one is suffered (helping behavior); and (3) a person who is carrying out an action that irrelevant to the other one (neural behavior). Additionally, the protagonists in these scenarios were all acting without the presence of faces, and therefore the participants would have no emotional clues for these social interactions. | 10 minutes | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Moral Evaluation: Rating of Moral Action Task | Outside the MRI scanner, participants carried out the Moral Action Task again. They were instructed to imagine themselves as the actor in the animation and pressed the button just like they really did the moral actions. Moreover, they were asked how much guilt or warm-glow after doing the action. The ratings were on a visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 7 points (Yoder & Decety, 2014). | 5 minutes | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
tDCS, Moral Decision-Making, Implicit Attitude, fMRI