A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This is a Phase IIa open label, non placebo controlled, non-randomised controlled challenge study. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of a new influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, when administered as a single dose to healthy volunteers. Initially two volunteers will be vaccinated and challenged with Influenza, followed by vaccination of a further 12 volunteers and an Influenza challenge of those 12 along with 12 non-vaccinated controls.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Antibodies against the external proteins of influenza can prevent the virus from infecting cells and either prevent infection or limit the spread of infection. However the surface proteins are highly variable and there is little antibody cross-reactivity between variants. Once a cell has been infected with the virus, it is then vulnerable to T cell attack resulting in the destruction of infected cells so that no more virus can be produced and the infection is controlled. There is evidence from clinical trials of influenza challenge, and animal models that T cell responses can protect in the absence of antibodies. Additionally, since T cells can recognise the highly conserved internal proteins of influenza, cross-subtype protection can be achieved. Seasonal influenza infection results in a T cell response to the virus which can protect against subsequent infection. However over the course of a few years these responses decline below protective levels. The new vaccine being tested in this study is designed to boost these T cell responses back to protective levels. Even responses that may be too low to be reliably quantified by currently available assays may still be boosted to high levels by a single dose of recombinant MVA. Since the internal proteins vary little between influenza subtypes, this could result in a 'universal' vaccine against influenza A. If the need to continually reformulate the vaccine in response to mutations in the viral coat proteins can be removed, the universal vaccine could be produced in large amounts and used more widely than the existing seasonal 'flu vaccines, thus protecting the population against currently circulating viruses and new virus types that are at present only found in avian species. There is very little polymorphism of NP and M1 between influenza A isolates. NP is 92% identical between H3N2 and H1N1 strains, and 91% identical between H3N2 and H5N1 strains. M1 is 95% identical between H3N2 and H1N1 strains, and 93% identical between H3N2 and H5N1 strains. This low level of variation appears to allow strong T cell cross-reactivity. MVA is a highly attenuated strain of vaccinia virus that is unable to replicate efficiently in human cell lines and most mammalian cells. Viral replication is blocked at a late stage of virion assembly, so, importantly, viral and recombinant protein synthesis is unimpaired. This means that MVA is an efficient single round expression vector, incapable of causing infection in mammals. Replication-deficient recombinant MVA has been seen as an exceptionally safe viral vector. This safety in man is consistent with the avirulence of MVA in animal models, where recombinant MVAs have also been shown to be protectively immunogenic as vaccines against viral diseases and cancer. Importantly for a vaccine which may eventually be used in a large proportion of the population, recombinant MVAs expressing HIV antigens have been shown to be safe and immunogenic in HIV-infected subjects.

Official Title
-----------------
A Phase IIA Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults

Conditions
-----------------
Influenza

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Biological: MVA-NP+M1


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Male or females aged 18 - 45 years HI titre of less than 10 In general good health determined by a screening evaluation (medical history, physical examination, vital signs electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical safety laboratory tests). ECG and spirometry will be performed at entry into quarantine rather than at screening visit Females should fulfil the following criteria: (i) not pregnant or breastfeeding for the duration of the study and (ii) agree to use a reliable form of contraception for the duration of the study if sexually active Negative HBsAg, HIV and HCV antibody screen Negative class A drugs of abuse screen Have not been vaccinated for Influenza virus in the current season or had a known influenza virus infection in the current season Give written informed consent to participate Willingness to remain in isolation during the challenge phase of the study and to comply with all study requirements Willing and able to communicate with the Investigator and understand the requirements of the study Exclusion Criteria: Participation in another research study involving an investigational product in the 30 days preceding enrolment, or planned use of an IMP during the study period Prior receipt of a recombinant MVA vaccine (vaccinees only) Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within the three months preceding date of enrolment. Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient state, including HIV infection; asplenia; recurrent, severe infections and chronic (more than 14 days) immunosuppressant medication within the past 6 months History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine, e.g. egg products. Any allergy to eggs or egg products Any history of anaphylaxis in reaction to vaccination Current cancer (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ) Serious current psychiatric condition Any other chronic illness requiring hospital specialist supervision Suspected or known current injecting drug or alcohol abuse (as defined by an alcohol intake of greater than 42 units every week) Any other significant disease, disorder or finding, which, in the opinion of the Investigators, may either put the volunteer at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the volunteer's ability to participate in the study. Any clinically significant abnormal finding on screening biochemistry or haematology blood tests or urinalysis (see Table 1. Values outside the stated limits of Table 1 need written comment by a physician if considered clinically insignificant). Venous access inadequate for phlebotomy demands of the study Clinically significant abnormality on ECG History since age 13 of asthma of any aetiology Smokers who are unwilling or unable to desist for the duration of the inpatient challenge component of the study Any anatomic or neurologic abnormality impairing the gag reflex or associated with a risk of aspiration Presence of febrile illness or symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection on the day of vaccination (vaccination would be deferred) Presence of febrile illness or symptoms suggestive of influenza between admission for influenza challenge and administration of the challenge inoculum Use of inhaled, topical or systemic steroids in the six months preceding date of enrolment other than occasional use of cutaneous steroid if considered clinically irrelevant to the study by the Investigator.. Donation of blood or blood products within 7 days before study entry or at any time during the study Donation of plasma within 7 days of study entry Anti-'flu antibody titre of 10 or greater

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 45 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Vaccinated<br>14 volunteers (2 in lead safety group and 12 in main study group) to receive MVA-NP+M1 via the IM route. Volunteers will then be challenged with Influenza 30 days post vaccination. | Biological: MVA-NP+M1<br>* Intramuscular injection at 1.5 x 10^8 pfu/ml at day 0<br>|
| No Intervention: Control<br>12 volunteers who will not receive vaccine but will also be challenged with Influenza on day 30 | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Safety of a new Influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, when administered to healthy volunteers |  | 6 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cellular immune response generated by a new influenza vaccine MVA- NP+M1 when administered as a single dose to healthy adults. |  | 6 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Influenza, Vaccine