Evaluation of the Survival of Inflamed Mature Single Rooted Teeth

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The majority of articles present in literature concerning the enrollment of tissue engineering in the field of root canal treatment is concerned with the treatment of affected teeth with immature apex, after proper systematic search online, only 4 articles where found that are dealing with the treatment of teeth with mature apex. These 4 studies are case reports. None of these studies has been a randomized clinical trial, the gold standard of interventional trials resulting in the highest level of evidence that contributes effectively in the clinical decision-making process as to the best intervention for the patient's condition providing the most effective clinical outcomes for the satisfaction of the patient. Since that the triad of regenerative endodontics are the key of success of any attempt to regenerate pulp, 2 different maneuvers shall be done in this study.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Preservation of the natural dentition had always been a primary objective in endodontic practice. When the pulp is diseased or requires removal for restorative reasons, it is replaced with an artificial filling material during conventional root canal treatment. Root canal treatment has lots of drawbacks, starting with different iatrogenic errors during endodontic procedures, weakening of remaining tooth structure which might affect the tooth survival. Also Root canal treated teeth require the placement of a post and core, which itself is doubtful whether it increases fracture resistance of the tooth or it weakens it. The most important drawback is that the survival of affected pulp is hindered by the conventional root canal treatment. Thus a new treatment approach was introduced utilizing the body ability to regenerate, called Pulp Regeneration. Regeneration was first introduced in the dental field as a solution for immature apex treatment, due to difficulties encountered during its conventional root canal treatment. Here the Pulp regeneration shall be used on vital mature teeth to increase the survival rate of the affected teeth.

Official Title
-----------------
Short Term Success of Inflamed Mature Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis Following Single Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocols (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Conditions
-----------------
Regeneration

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Conventional
* Procedure: PRF


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who are free from any physical or mental handicapping condition with no underlying systemic diseases. Non-pregnant females Single canalled teeth. Patients having vital, mature, single rooted teeth, clinical evidence of pulpitis and apical periodontitis. Positive patient/Guardian compliance for participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Any known sensitivity or adverse reactions to medicaments or pharmaceuticals necessary to complete the trial. Non-restorable coronal portion of teeth involved in the trial. Non Vital teeth Immature teeth Traumatized teeth Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption. Single Rooted teeth with multiple canals.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 16 Years
Maximum Age: 25 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: conventional<br>Conventional blood clot technique | Procedure: Conventional<br>* Conventional Blood Clot Technique<br>|
| Experimental: PRF<br>Platelet Rich Fibrin Technique | Procedure: PRF<br>* Platelet Rich Fibrin Technique<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change of tooth Sensitivity | Electric Pulp Tester | 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 Months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Survival | Clinical examination of tooth integrity | 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 Months | 
| Clinical Success | Clinical examination the signs & symptoms is present or absent | 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 Months | 
| Pericapical Status | CBCT assessment in Hounsfield unit | 6, 9, 12 Months | 
| Periapical Status | Digital Periapical Radiograph in pixels | 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 Months |