Effect of Black Mulberry Lollipop on Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Children

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
THE EFFECT OF BLACK MULBERRY LOLLIPOP AND SODIUM BICARBONATE USED IN ORAL CARE ON PREVENTION OF ORAL MUCOSITIS AMONG CHILDREN RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY DUE TO CANCER

Detailed Description
-----------------
The study was conducted experimentally to determine the effect of black mulberry lollipop and sodium bicarbonate used in oral care on prevention of oral mucositis in children followed up due to the diagnosis of cancer. Sodium bicarbonate and black mulberry treatment were compared to prevent oral mucositis in 69 children receiving chemotherapy due to cancer. While 35 children were assigned to the experimental group (sodium bicarbonate + black mulberry lollipop application), 34 were assigned to the control group (sodium bicarbonate application).

Official Title
-----------------
The Effect of Black Mulberry Lollipop and Sodium Bicarbonate Used in Oral Care on Prevention of Oral Mucositis Among Children Receiving Chemotherapy Due to Cancer

Conditions
-----------------
Oral Mucositis

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Oral Mucositis


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Being in the age group of 3-18 years Being hospitalised for chemotherapy treatment Not having oral mucositis No using another method to protect oral mucosa during the study period Not having the history of black mulberry (similar fruit berries, blackberries, etc.) allergy Not having intolerance to cold Exclusion Criteria: -Not having food in mouth

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 3 Years
Maximum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: The power of the test in the study was calculated by using G*Power 3.1 program. While Type I error is 0.05 and the power of the test is 0.80 (α= 0.05, 1-β= 0.80), minimal sample size was calculated as 62 children (31 children in each group). By considering the losses that may occur from the sample during the study due to any reason, it was planned to include 40 children in both experimental and control groups. Follow-up lost occurred in 5 patients from experimental group and 6 patients in the control group during the study. The study was completed with 69 paediatric patients including 34 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group.
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: METHOD<br>The power of the test in the study was calculated by using G*Power 3.1 program. While Type I error is 0.05 and the power of the test is 0.80 (α= 0.05, 1-β= 0.80), minimal sample size was calculated as 62 children (31 children in each group). By considering the losses that may occur from the sample during the study due to any reason, it was planned to include 40 children in both experimental and control groups. Follow-up lost occurred in 5 patients from experimental group and 6 patients in the control group during the study. The study was completed with 69 paediatric patients including 34 in the experimental group and 35 in the control group. | Other: Oral Mucositis<br>* The data of the study were obtained by conducting six interviews with each child and the family. The first interview was conducted before starting to treatment on the first day of the treatment, the second interview was conducted on the 2nd day after the treatment and the following interviews were conducted on the 4th, 8th, 16th, and 21st days and in-mouth mucosa of the patient was evaluated by taking in-mouth pictures following interviewing with the child and the family. Oral care application was conducted four times a day with sodium bicarbonate solution and a lollipop made with black mulberry syrup (after meals and before going to the bed at night). Oral care was first conducted by the researcher, the oral care was then taught to the patient and patient's relatives and the application was evaluated. Figure 1 shows the study design.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Patient Follow-up Form | It has 16 questions prepared by the researcher utilising literature and including sociodemographic characteristic and oral care habits of the child and family. | 3 minute | 
| Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale | Tomlison et al. (2010) developed Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale (ChIMES) in order to evaluate the difficulty experienced by children with cancer due to mouth/throat pain developing depending on mucositis. Yavuz et al., (2011) conducted the validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the scale. The scale consists of six (6) questions and it is an easy-to-apply form that can be answered with the child's facial expressions. | 2 minute | 
| Nurse Observation Chart of Child Mucositis Evaluation | It was prepared in parallel with Oral Mucositis Evaluation Index of the World Health Organization and formed to monitor formation or level of oral mucositis in children on the first, second, fourth, eights, sixteenth and twenty first days. | 10 minute | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Keywords: chemotherapy, oral mucositis, black mulberry, bicarbonate, paediatric oncology