DiSCIoser: Improving Arm Sensorimotor Functions After Spinal Cord Injury Via Brain-Computer Interface Training

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The goal of this clinical trial is to validate the efficacy of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-based intervention for hand motor recovery in subacute cervical spinal cord injured (SCI) patients during rehabilitation. The study will provide evidence for the clinical/neurophysiological efficacy of the BCI intervention as a means to promote cortical sensorimotor plasticity (remote plasticity) and thus maximize recovery of arm functions in subacute cervical SCI. Participants will undergo an extensive clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessment before and after a BCI training based on motor Imagery (MI) of hands. The intervention will be delivered with a system that was originally validated for stroke patients and adapted to the aims of this study. Researchers will compare the BCI intervention with an active MI training without BCI support (active comparator).

Detailed Description
-----------------
Despite its relatively low incidence SCI represents a devastating chronic condition for which there is still no cure or consistent approach for intervention. Cervical SCI tremendously affects the quality of life since the use of the upper extremities is critical for completing basic activities of daily living. Extensive research conducted on SCI animal models and humans has revealed that cortical and subcortical reorganization (ie., remote plasticity) takes place after SCI and it is associated with recovery of sensorimotor function (in humans the relevance of these aspect has been mainly emphasised in incomplete SCI). Current rehabilitation after traumatic SCI mainly consists of intensive training of lost/impaired function that is assumed to augment activity-dependent plasticity of spared circuits and thus, leading to functional improvements. Recently, neuromodulatory interventions targeting the sensorimotor systems at various levels has been applied in humans with SCI in combination with training to enhance functional recovery. Neurological rehabilitation of SCI can also benefit of cognitive training based on MI, that enables active stimulation of brain motor areas promoting brain plasticity associated with positive effects on motor performance. In the effort of encouraging the top-down contribution of supraspinal sensorimotor signaling in SCI rehabilitation, the BCI technology may provide for fundamental tools not only for restoring but even recovering sensorimotor function. The long history of BCI research in SCIs has been substantially devoted to develop systems to control external devices to restore function. However, recent findings indicate that non invasive BCI training in combination with intensive rehabilitation can be beneficial to chronic SCI patients for gait, as well as arm function recovery. The current study relies on the hypothesis that monitoring and modulating brain plasticity occurring as a consequence of a SCI is a key factor in shaping clinically valuable top-down rehabilitation strategies that target the recovery of sensorimotor function in patients with SCI. To ground such vision, the researchers will use a goal-oriented action imagery training which is controlled and objectified by a BCI as a means to engage sensorimotor system and thus to facilitate neuroplasticity and optimize functional recovery in SCI during the subacute phase in which brain and spinal plasticity is at its climax. In this study researchers will test the superiority of a BCI-assisted MI training (up to 12 weeks duration) with respect to MI practiced without BCI feedback (similar training setting and duration) to promote recovery of sensorimotor functions in traumatic cervical SCI subjects. The main hypothesis is that establishing a real-time contingency between the content of MI and an ecological feedback specifically designed to train MI in SCI patients will boost the effect of MI training in engaging the sensorimotor system. Primary and secondary outcome measures (reported in the dedicated section) include the most commonly used clinical and functional scales to assess SCI patients recovery. Neurophysiological and Neuroimaging outcomes are reported as other outcome measures in the dedicated session. Neuropsychological evaluation will include Test of Attentional Performance (TAP), Stroop Test, Trail Making Test (TMT), assessment of depression and anxiety; body ownership and representation. Furthermore, motivation, satisfaction, workload and usability will be evaluated along training.

Official Title
-----------------
DiSCIoser: Unlocking Recovery Potential of Arm Sensorimotor Functions After Spinal Cord Injury by Promoting Activity-dependent Brain Plasticity and Modeling the Causal Relationship Between Brain Plasticity and Recovery of Function

Conditions
-----------------
Spinal Cord Injuries, Motor Disorders

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: EEG-based BCI system for (hands) Motor Imagery training
* Other: Control - MI intervention


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: subacute cervical SCI (30-90 days from event) classification according to ISNCSCI AIS A-D, lesion level C1-T1 Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) < 40 Exclusion Criteria: other conditions (present or previous) potentially affecting sensorimotor upper limb function inability to give informed consent and understand the requirements for the training

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Eligible subacute cervical SCI patients admitted to Fondazione Santa Lucia Hospital for standard rehabilitation care will be randomized in equal proportions (1:1 ratio) between BCI-assisted MI training- EXP) and Control (MI without BCI - CTRL).
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: EXP - BCI<br>(EEG-)BCI- assisted MI training delivered as add-on regimen (Standard physiotherapy-3 h/day, 5 day/week). | Other: EEG-based BCI system for (hands) Motor Imagery training<br>* For the purposes of this study we adapted an available BCI-supported motor imagery (MI) training station, equipped with a computer, a commercial wireless Electroencephalography (EEG)/ Electromyography (EMG) system, a screen for therapist feedback and a screen for the real-time ecological feedback to patient - a custom software program that provides a for (personalized) visual representation of the patient's own hands. This software allows the therapists to create an artificial reproduction of patient's hands/forearms by adjusting a digitally created image in shape, size, skin colour and orientation to match as much as possible the real patient hands/forearms. Training consists of the MI tasks of both hands, grasping or finger extension in separate runs. The trial length will include a constant baseline period of 4 sec and a task period of maximally 10 sec for BCI intervention group. Each training session will consist of 4 runs (20 trials each).<br>* Other names: BCI - EXP;|
| Active Comparator: CTRL - MI<br>MI training delivered as add-on regimen (Standard physiotherapy-3 h/day, 5 day/week). | Other: Control - MI intervention<br>* Training consists of MI tasks of both hands, grasping or finger extension in separate runs. MI training will be delivered with a dose/setting regimen equivalent to EXP intervention. The trial length will include a constant baseline period of 4 sec and a task period of maximally 4 sec. Each training session will consist of 4 runs (20 trials each).<br>* Other names: MI - CTRL;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mean change from baseline on Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) somatosensory scores of bilateral arms at end of intervention | The GRASSP scale (somatosensory sub-section) ranges from 0 (maximum impairment) to 12 (normal) for each side arm. | Pre-Randomization, Post Training (within 48 hours) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mean change from baseline on Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) motor scores of bilateral arms at end of intervention | The GRASSP scale (motor sub-section) ranges from 0 (maximum impairment) to 50 (normal) for each side arm. | Pre-Randomization, Post Training (within 48 hours) | 
| Mean change from baseline in the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM) - self care section | The SCIM is the most commonly used independence scale for SCI patients. The Self Care section includes questions on feeding, grooming, bathing and dressing ranging from 0 (dependence) to 20 (independence). | Pre-Randomization, Post Training (within 48 hours) | 
| Mean change in Pain as assessed by the International SCI Pain Basic Dataset (ISCIPBDS) | The ISCIPBDS assesses pain in SCI patients. The questions concern pain severity, physical and emotional function and include a pain-intensity rating, a pain classification and questions related to the temporal pattern of pain for each specific pain problem. The impact of pain on physical, social and emotional function, and sleep is evaluated for each pain. Each question ranges from 0 to 10. | Pre-Randomization, Post Training (within 48 hours) | 
| Mean change in Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) from the ISNCSCI AIS evaluation | The UEMS of the AIS assessment evaluates residual strength in upper limb segments and ranges from 0 to 50 (for both arms) | Pre-Randomization, Post Training (within 48 hours) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
spinal cord injury, brain computer interface, motor imagery, motor rehabilitation, neurorehabilitation, brain plasticity