Impact of the Fecal Flora Transplantation on Crohn's Disease

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Crohn's disease is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory bowel disease. Many data show that the intestinal flora is involved in the disease and it has been show that patients with Crohn's disease exhibit an abnormal fecal flora that might play a role in inflammation. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the fecal flora transplantation on Crohn's disease.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Introduction : Crohn's disease (CD) is an relapsing inflammatory bowel disease relatively frequent. Its prevalence is about 1 for 700 in France, affecting predominantly young adults. Its treatment is based on immunosuppressants that might be associated with potentially severe complications such as infection and cancers. Moreover, these treatments are expensive. The gut microbiota being involved in the disease pathogenesis, it can be considered as a potential therapeutic target. CD pathogenesis remains poorly understood but involves an inappropriate immune response toward an unbalanced gut microbiota (called dysbiosis) in predisposed hosts. The complete replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a healthy one is thus an attractive strategy. Fecal transplantation (FT) has been used with success for a long time in the context of Clostridium difficile. Hypothesis : Fecal transplantation allow the replacement of a dysbiotic microbiota by a  healthy  one with favorable impact on CD evolution. Primary endpoint : In CD patient with colonic or ileo-colonic involvement put in remission with corticosteroids, Evaluate if FT can modify a dysbiotic fecal microbiota to be closer of the one of a healthy donor. Methodology For the Receiver : Once corticoid-induced remission will be achieved, the patient will be included and randomised to receive either FT or sham transplantation during a colonoscopy. The patient will be evaluated at week 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 and 24. At week 6, a colonoscopy will be performed. For the Donor : Donors will be recruited by poster advertising. When a receiver will be included, 3 donors will be contacted to attend an inclusion visit including physical examination as well as blood and stool screening for pathogen. The 3 donors will then come the day of the FT to donate their stool.

Official Title
-----------------
Impact of Fecal transPlantAtion on MiCrobotia and hosT in Crohn's Disease

Conditions
-----------------
Crohn's Disease

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Fecal Transplantation
* Other: Sham Transplantation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Receiver Inclusion Criteria: Age > 18 years and < 70 years Crohn's disease with colonic or ileo-colonic involvement Active disease at screening defined by a Harvey Bradshaw Index >4 Clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5) in the 3 weeks following corticosteroid onset Patient with health insurance Written consent obtained Exclusion Criteria: Fistulizing disease Anoperineal or abdominal abscess Complication requiring surgical treatment Treatment with anti-TNFa (ongoing or stopped in the 1 month preceding randomization) Immunosuppressant treatment started or stopped in the 3 months preceding randomization Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intake in the 4 weeks preceding randomization Antibiotics or antifungic treatment in the 4 weeks preceding colonoscopy Probiotics intake in the 4 weeks preceding colonoscopy Clostridium difficile infection in the 10 days preceding randomization contraindication to colonoscopy or anesthesia Pregnancy Donor Inclusion Criteria: Age > 20 years and < 50 years 27kg/m² > BMI > 17 kg/m² Regular bowel movement with usually one bowel movement in the morning Subject with health insurance Written consent obtained Exclusion Criteria: Infection risk: Known infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Human T Leukemia Virus (HTLV), Hepatitis B or C virus. At risk behavior: Travel (in the preceding 3 months, excepting in Euro area, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Croatia, Hungary, Republic Tcheque, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Swiss, USA or Canada), at risk sexual activity (intercourse without protection with a new partner) in the preceding 6 months, blood transfusion, piercing or tattoo in the preceding 6 months residence of several years in intertropical area, abroad hospitalization more than 24 hours in the last 12 months (including patient and his immediate family). Positive result at one of the screening tests for infectious disease. : HIV, HCV, HBV, HTLV, syphilis, Enteric viruses (Rotavirus, HEV, Adenovirus, Norovirus, Enterovirus, HAV, Poliovirus, Astrovirus, Aichi virus, Sapovirus), parasites in stool (Cyclospora, Isospora, Cryptosporidium, Microsporidium, Strongyloides stercoralis, Entamoeba histolitica, Giardia intestinalis, Dientamoeba fragilis), and in blood (Strongyloides stercoralis, Trichinella spiralis, Amoebiasis), pathogenic bacteria in stool (Clostridium difficile, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio cholerae/parahemolyticus, verotoxin-producing E. coli) Anal lesions suggesting viral infection or positive test for HSV anal and/or multi-drug resistant bacteria (Enterobacteria producing extended spectrum betalactamase, Actinobacter baumanii, Vancomycin resistant enterococci and carbapenemase producing bacteria). Positive test for multidrug resistant bacteria If receiver is EBV negative, EBV positive donor will be excluded If receiver is CMV negative, CMV positive donor will be excluded. If receiver is negative for Toxoplasma gondii, positive donor for Toxoplasma gondii will be excluded Known transmissible infectious disease Infection (or possible infection) in the 7 days preceding screening Risk factors for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Personal history of Typhoid fever Gastrointestinal comorbidity Personal history or first degree relative : Inflammatory bowel disease Coeliac disease Personal history of irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea Personal history of gastrointestinal neoplasia or polyposis First degree relative with gastrointestinal neoplasia or polyposis before 60 years old Gastrointestinal infection in the 3 preceding months (defined by the occurrence of an acute diarrhea that last less than a week) Factors possibly affecting the composition of the microbiota: Antibiotics or antifungic intake in the 3 preceding months before FT Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intake in the 4 weeks preceding FT Specific diet (exclusion diet, vegetarian diet) Pregnancy Immunosuppressant intake (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, biologics, etc) Anti neoplastic chemotherapy Hemorrhoid disease Personal history or first degree relative with inflammatory or autoimmune disease Other Factors : Known chronic disease Abnormality at initial biological check up: blood cells count, fasting, glycaemia, kidney function, liver tests, haemostasis, calprotectin Long term curative therapy Recent intake of food allergens related of receiver's known allergy between screening and FT : At risk behavior (Travel, at risk sexual activity, blood transfusion, piercing tattoo, accidental blood exposure) Anal lesions suggestive of viral infection or positivity for HSV in anal area Infection or possible infection Occurrence of gastro-intestinal symptoms Medicine intake in the 48 hours preceding FT (except contraceptive) In case of woman: menstruation in the 48 hours preceding FT

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Fecal Transplantation<br>patients receiving the fecal transplant (fecal microbiota from a healthy donor) | Other: Fecal Transplantation<br>* Fecal microbiota (50-100g of stool from donor resuspended in 250-350ml of physiological serum and filtered) given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy<br>|
| Sham Comparator: Sham Transplantation<br>patients receiving the vehicle (Physiological serum) | Other: Sham Transplantation<br>* 250-350ml of physiological serum given by infusion in coecum during colonoscopy<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| FT success defined by : Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] > Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs receiver before FT]) with Sorensen's index [receiver 6 weeks after FT vs donor] ≥ 0.6. | In other words, FT success is reached if the fecal microbiota of the receiver 6 weeks after FT is closer of the fecal microbiota of the donor that of the receiver before FT. Fecal microbiota composition will be assessed by 454 pyrosequencing (16S RNA) and microbiota comparison will be done using Sorensen's index. | 6 weeks after FT | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| FT feasibility | evaluate the feasibility of the FT procedure (frequency of evaluable patients in each group) | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Clinical relapse rate in the 24 weeks following FT procedure | Clinical relapse defined by a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) > 220 points, or by a CDAI between 150 and 220 with an increase >70 compared with baseline, or by the need of surgery or to start a medical treatment for CD. | 24 weeks following FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on CRP level. | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Leukocytes level | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Leukocytes level | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal calprotectin | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal calprotectin | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on fecal microbiota composition | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: fecal microbiota composition | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in blood | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in blood | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on lymphocytes population in colon | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: lymphocytes population in colon. | 6 weeks after FT | 
| Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on colon transcriptomics | Effect of FT compared to sham transplantation on: colon transcriptomics. | 6 weeks after FT | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, microbiota, fecal transplantation