Positive Affect Promotion to Empower Optimal Adherence to HIV Therapy

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of the APPEAL program, a 3-session intervention designed to promote positive affect among men and women living with HIV infection. Forty participants will be randomly assigned to receive the APPEAL program, and another 40 will receive standard of care. All participants will complete self-reported assessments at baseline and at 3 and 6 months, and will have their HIV antiretroviral medication adherence monitored as part of study participation.

Detailed Description
-----------------
There is strong reason to expand the scope of current adherence programs to include consideration of a group of health protective variables known as 'psychosocial assets'. These assets include cognitive factors, such as optimism, emotional factors, such as positive affect, and positive social relationships. Increased psychosocial assets such as positive affect are associated with reduced morbidity and mortality, slower slower HIV progression, and reduced burden of depression symptoms. However, there has been limited translation of positive affect interventions to support patient self-management. In this study, we extend previous research on positive affect and adherence through the APPEAL program. The Affect, Promoting Positive Engagement, and Adherence for Life (APPEAL) program is an intervention that combines positive affect approaches to promote adherence in patients who have suboptimal adherence. We seek to implement the program, assess its feasibility, and describe associations with theoretically derived mechanisms of change, including positive affect.

Official Title
-----------------
Positive Affect Promotion to Empower Optimal Adherence to HIV Therapy (Project APPEAL)

Conditions
-----------------
HIV/AIDS

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: APPEAL


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Receiving HIV care at site of recruitment Prescribed an HIV antiretroviral regimen HIV RNA viral load less than 200 copies/mL in last six months Exclusion Criteria: Unable to communicate in English Prior participation in formative components of the study Plans to move outside of New York City in next six months Has cognitive impairment that would limit ability to provide informed consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: APPEAL Program<br>Participants receive the APPEAL program, consisting of three one-on-one sessions, each lasting approximately one hour, and spaced one month apart. Sessions are designed to promote positive affect. Participants receive optional weekly check-ins to support behavior change efforts. All participants continue to receive standard of care. | Behavioral: APPEAL<br>* Three-session, individually administered program, with sessions spaced monthly. Optional weekly contacts with participants to support engagement in program exercises/activities.<br>|
| No Intervention: Standard of care<br>Participants receive standard of care. | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Feasibility of recruitment approaches | The percentage of eligible individuals consented and randomized | Baseline to 6 months | 
| Feasibility of retention methods | The percentage of enrolled individuals who complete baseline, three-month, and six-month self-report evaluation measures | Baseline to 3 months | 
| Acceptability of intervention | The percentage of individuals in the intervention condition who complete all three sessions | Baseline to 6 months | 
| Changes in the proposed mechanistic target of positive and negative emotions, assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) | The PANAS is a 20 item measure which assesses emotions utilizing 5 response options for each question, ranging in value from 1 to 5. PANAS includes two 10-item subscales: positive affect and negative affect. Positive affect and negative affect items are summed separately, with each subscale ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores for positive affect subscale indicate higher levels of positive affect and lower scores for negative affect items indicate lower levels of negative affect | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Modified Differential Emotions Scale (MDES). | The MDES is a 20 item measure which assesses emotions utilizing 5 response options for each question, ranging in value from 0 to 4. MDES includes two 10-item subscales: positive affect and negative affect. Positive affect and negative affect items are summed separately, and each is divided by 10, with each subscale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher score for each subscale indicate greater frequency of experiencing positive or negative emotions. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST 10) | The DAST 10 is a 10 item screen for drug abuse. It includes 10 items, each response with a 0 or 1. Items are summed, with a range of responses from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater negative consequences of drug abuse. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS4) | The PSS4 measures perceived stress. Each of the 4 items has five possible response options, ranging from 0 to 4. The resulting summed scale can range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater stress. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Coping Strategies Inventory, Short Form (CSISF) | The CSISF is a 16 item scale assessing approaches to coping with stressors. Each of the items has 5 potential response options, ranging from 1 to 5, and items are grouped into four 4-item subscales. Items within each subscale are summed, resulting in a subscale range from 4 to 20. Higher scores on each of the subscales, focused on 1) Problem-Focused Engagement, (2) Problem-Focused Disengagement, (3) Emotion-Focused Engagement, and (4) Emotion-Focused Disengagement, indicates greater frequency of use of that particular coping strategy. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) | The LOT-R is a 6-item measure of generalized optimism versus pessimism. For each of the items there are 5 response options ranging from 0 to 4. Items are summed with a scale range of 0 to 24, and with higher scores indicating greater optimism. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 item (PHQ8) | The PHQ8 is an 8-item measure assessing burden of depression symptoms. Each item has 4 response options ranging from 0 to 3; items are summed with a resulting scale range of 0 to 24. Higher scores suggest greater risk for depression. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Measurement properties (range, missingness, reliability) and mean scores with standard deviations for the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Concise (AUDIT-C) | The AUDIT-C is a 3-item measure assessing risk for alcohol use disorder. Each item has 4 response options ranging from 0 to 4, and items are summed with a resulting range from 0 to 12. In men, a score of 4 or more is considered positive for an alcohol use disorder; in women, a score of 3 or more is considered positive. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Frequency of endorsement of stressful life events utilizing a modification of the Crisis in Family Systems (CRYSIS) | An adapted version of the CRISYS checklist is being utilized, based on formative feedback on the scale. The adapted measure lists thirty-four events, with a 0 indicating no experience and a 1 indicating an experience. The checklist can range from 0 to 34 possible events. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Self-reported values of percent adherence | Single item asking over past 30 days how often medication was taken as prescribed. Four response options available: 100%, 95-99% 75-94%, less than 75% | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Self-reported adherence with medication taking instructions | Single item asking over past 30 days how good of a job did participant do at take medication in the way that they are supposed to. Six response options available: Very poor, poor, fair, good, very good, excellent | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Self-reported adherence missed doses of medication | Single item asking number of days in the past 30 days that participant missed at least one dose of medication | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | 
| Feasibility of electronic medication adherence | Proportion of participants who utilize Wisepill throughout study participation | Baseline through 6 months | 
| HIV RNA viral load | Chart review will be conducted to assess HIV RNA viral load | Baseline through 6 months | 
| Retention in care | Chart review will be conducted to assess kept and missed study visits | Baseline through six months |