A Study Looking at How Well Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder on Medications Like Having More Protein

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Antipsychotic medications are commonly prescribed in children and adults with ASD (Curtin, Jojic & Bandini, 2014). But weight gain has been known to be one of the less desirable effects of these medications, increasing one's risk for overweight and obesity. Based on experience in Holland Bloorview's Nutrition Clinic, working with a dietitian to follow specific dietary advice, such as having more protein while keeping the amount of calories the same, may be a possible and useful way to limit weight gain. This study's objective is to evaluate the feasibility (study designs, methods, processes) and acceptability (client/family satisfaction, perceived effectiveness) of a controlled energy diet with elevated protein intake in children and youth with ASD who are currently taking prescribed atypical antipsychotic medication.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The use of psychotropic medication in children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to treat symptoms of aggression, irritability and related behavioural problems has become increasingly common in recent years. Data obtained from clinical and nationally representative populations of children demonstrate that approximately 30%-60% of children with ASD are prescribed at least one psychotropic medication, and 10% are prescribed more than three medications at the same time (Curtin, Jojic & Bandini, 2014). Weight gain, which is one of the harmful effects of psychotropic medication, is likely one of the most understood risk factors for obesity in children and adults with ASD. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded, randomized, controlled trials studying the metabolic adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents under 18 years of age, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole were associated with statistically significant weight gain compared with placebo (Almandil et al., 2013). Similar findings were reported from a review of literature, using PubMed, on weight gain and increase of BMI among children and adolescents (0-18 years old) treated with antipsychotic medications (Martinez-Ortega et al., 2013). Although clinical trials with different agents have been conducted in an attempt to address weight gain in individuals on psychotropic medications, no established treatments or preventative measures have been developed to combat psychotropic-induced weight gain (PIWG) to date (Curtin, Jojic & Bandini, 2014). A review of published literature using PubMed yielded limited and mixed results for using Metformin as the intervention for the treatment in combating PIWG (Anagostou et al., 2016; Handen et al., 2017). Based on clinical experience in Holland Bloorview's Nutrition Clinic, controlled energy intake combined with elevated protein intake (CEEP) may represent an effective and practical strategy for limiting weight gain. Potential beneficial outcomes associated with protein ingestion include: a) increased satiety, which is being satisfactorily full - protein generally increases satiety to a greater extent than carbohydrate or fat and may facilitate a reduction in energy consumption; b) increased thermogenesis, which is the production of heat in the body - higher protein diets are associated with an increase in thermogenesis, which also influences satiety and increases energy expenditure; and c) maintenance or growth of fat-free mass (muscle) - an elevated protein diet may provide an increase effect on muscle protein synthesis in some individuals, favouring the retention of lean muscle mass while improving metabolic profile (Paddon-Jones et al., 2018). This study's primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility (study designs, methods, processes) and acceptability (client/family satisfaction, perceived effectiveness) of a controlled energy diet with elevated protein intake in children and youth with ASD who are currently taking prescribed atypical antipsychotic medication. Children and youth, ages 6-17 years old, with ASD (n=10) on atypical antipsychotic medication will be exposed to specific nutrition recommendations involving CEEP for ten consecutive weeks. Each participant and parent/guardian will work collaboratively with the RD/RA to formulate strategies to slowly increase protein intake in the range of 20-30% of total caloric intake and ensure consistent energy intake. Data will be collected through food records, anthropometric measurements and informal post-intervention interviews to measure the feasibility and acceptability of the study processes and elevated protein dietary changes.

Official Title
-----------------
A Feasibility and Acceptability Study of Elevated Protein Dietary Intake for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) While on Atypical Antipsychotic Medication

Conditions
-----------------
Autism Spectrum Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Controlled energy diet with elevated protein intake


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Child Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of ASD Currently taking one or more atypical antipsychotic medication Ages 6-17 years old Enrolment as an active client in a Psychopharmacology Clinic at Holland Bloorview Accepts all food, based on the SOS Feeding Approach: Defining Picky vs. Problem Eaters by Kay Toomey (2017) - has no significant food aversions; will accept new foods on plate, usually can touch or taste; and consumes one or more foods from all food groups, varying in textures Can communicate in English Has access to a telephone Parent/guardian inclusion criteria: Provides care to study participant Can communicate in English Able to complete food records Has access to a telephone Exclusion Criteria: a) Child exclusion criteria: Medical condition that contradicts elevated protein intake Has significant food aversions Has any food allergies Currently participating in another clinical study that would interfere with anticipated endpoints and outcome measurements

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 6 Years
Maximum Age: 17 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Non-randomized pilot intervention study
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Other: Controlled energy intake with elevated protein intake<br>Dietary intervention - Participants will be counseled to elevate protein and control energy intake for ten consecutive weeks. | Other: Controlled energy diet with elevated protein intake<br>* Participants will be counseled to elevate protein and control energy intake for ten consecutive weeks. Protein intake will be increased in the range of 20-30% of total daily caloric intake. Each participant's diet will also be modified to implement controlled energy intake. Controlled energy intake will be defined as being isocaloric with the participant's current dietary intake.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Caloric and protein intake | Average caloric (kcal) and protein (g) intake - comparison of three day food records measured at the time of enrolment and during week 10 of intervention implementation | At the time of study enrolment (week 0) and during week 10 of intervention implementation (week 10) | 
| Pre- (at time of study enrolment) and post-intervention anthropometric measurements | Weight in kilograms - to calculate weight changes and BMI | Measured at the time of study enrolment (week 0) and after ten weeks of intervention (week 11), assessed up to 11 weeks | 
| Pre- (at time of study enrolment) and post-intervention anthropometric measurements | Height in centimetres - to calculate BMI | Measured at the time of study enrolment (week 0) and after ten weeks of intervention (week 11), assessed up to 11 weeks | 
| Pre- (at time of study enrolment) and post-intervention anthropometric measurements | Skinfold (triceps and subscapular) measurements in millimetres | Measured at the time of study enrolment (week 0) and after ten weeks of following the intervention (week 11), assessed up to 11 weeks | 
| Post-intervention interview with participants and family | Qualitative interview (guided using semi-structured format) to gain insight into successful strategies and potential barriers to consistently implement elevated protein dietary changes | Interview (anticipated duration of 60 minutes) will be conducted after week ten of intervention implementation (week 11) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Recruitment rates - comparisons between (i) number of patients screened; (ii) number of eligible patients identified from clinic; (iii) number of eligible patients approached; (iv) number of patients who agreed to further contact; and (v) number of participants consented and enrolled in the study. | During the screening and recruitment process (anticipated duration of 1-1.5 months) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Retention rate - comparison between (i) number of participants enrolled at the start of the study; and (ii) number of participants enrolled at the end of study. | Measurements taken at the start of the study during enrolment and at study completion (anticipated duration of 5 months) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Completion rates - Number of participants who completed the three-day food records | Measured at the time of study enrolment (week 0) and after ten weeks of intervention (week 11), assessed up to 11 weeks | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Qualitative interview (guided using semi-structured format) to assess the participants' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of completing food records | Interview (anticipated duration of 60 minutes) will be conducted after week ten of intervention implementation (week 11) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Qualitative interview (guided using semi-structured format) to assess the participants' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of attending on-site visits for anthropometric measurements | Interview (anticipated duration of 60 minutes) will be conducted after week ten of intervention implementation (week 11) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Qualitative interview (guided using semi-structured format) to assess the participants' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of following-up with the RA via phone during intervention implementation | Interview (anticipated duration of 60 minutes) will be conducted after week ten of intervention implementation (week 11) | 
| Study feasibility (designs, methods, processes) | Qualitative interview (guided using semi-structured format) to assess the participants' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of participating in the on-site post-intervention interview | Interview (anticipated duration of 60 minutes) will be conducted after week ten of intervention implementation (week 11) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Atypical antipsychotic medication, Psychotropic medication, Psychotropic-induced weight gain, Controlled energy intake with elevated protein, Dietary intervention, Acceptability, Feasibility