Supplementing Hearing Aids With Computerized Auditory Training

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study is designed to examine the effectiveness of a computer-based auditory training program to improve the benefits received by individuals who wear hearing aids. The study will involve 3 groups - a computer-based training group, an active listening group which will involve listening to books on CD, and a placebo group that receives no additional treatment.

Detailed Description
-----------------
This proposed study is a multi-site, single-masked (blinded), randomized controlled, parallel group clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of an at home PC-based auditory training as a supplement to standard-of-care hearing-aid intervention in veterans treated for hearing loss, with or without previous hearing-aid experience. The participants will be assigned randomly to one of three groups, with hearing-aid use stratified within the groups: (1) Group 1, HA+AT, in which the participants will receive standard-of-care hearing-aid intervention (HA) and complete the four-week LACE auditory training program (AT); (2) Group 2, HA, with the participants receiving only standard-of-care hearing-aid intervention (HA); and (3) Group 3, HA+DL, in which the participants will receive standard-of-care hearing-aid intervention (HA) and complete four-weeks of placebo auditory training, consisting of directed listening (DL) to books-on-tape. The participants in each group will attend four test sessions. During Session 1 the informed consent process will be completed, baseline assessments will be made to ensure that the participants meet the study inclusion criteria (page 52), testing of predictor variables (page 57-58) will be completed, and all hearing aids will be assessed for correct functionality (page 53). The participants then will be assigned randomly to a study group. Session 2 will occur four weeks after Session 1. During Session 2, baseline performance on the outcome measures will be assessed (page 54-57), as will performance on the predictor variables. Following testing, the participants in Groups 1 and 3 will receive training in the use of the AT or DL programs. Session 3 will occur at the end of the 4-week experimental training period. During Session 3 all participants will be retested on the outcome measures to assess short-term intervention outcomes. During Session 4, which will occur at seven-months post-study enrollment (i.e., six-months post training completion for Groups 1 and 3), all participants will be retested on all outcome measures to examine the long-term outcomes. In Sessions 2-4, the stability of hearing-aid function will be assessed through electroacoustic measures.

Official Title
-----------------
Supplementing Hearing Aids With Computerized Auditory Training

Conditions
-----------------
Hearing Loss

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: LACE-computer
* Behavioral: PLACEBO-Directed listening
* Behavioral: CONTROL
* Behavioral: Lace-DVD


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: adult onset hearing loss, English as the first language, bilateral, symmetric, sensorineural hearing loss, average audiometric thresholds for 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz less than 50-dB HL in either ear, aided speech recognition in quiet of 40% binaurally, appropriate cognitive skills assessed using the Mini Mental State Exam (Folstein et al., 1975) with age/education norms (Crum et al., 1993), adequate vision to participate in the study as determined with the Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance (SKILL) Card, eligible for VA-issued hearing aids. Exclusion Criteria: known neurological, psychiatric disorders, or co-morbid diseases that would prevent completion of the study as determined by chart review,

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 55 Years
Maximum Age: 85 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: LACE-DVD<br>Participants will complete the LACE training, however, not in an interactive computer mode but through a static DVD mode | Behavioral: Lace-DVD<br>* DVD based Auditory Training<br>|
| Experimental: LACE-COMPUTER<br>Participants will complete a computer-based auditory training program (i.e., LACE) | Behavioral: LACE-computer<br>* Computerized Auditory Training<br>|
| Active Comparator: PLACEBO-DIRECTED LISTENING<br>Participants will complete a directed listening to books on CD treatment | Behavioral: PLACEBO-Directed listening<br>* Subjects will be asked to listen to books on tape for 20 minutes a day and answer questions as they go along<br>|
| Active Comparator: CONTROL<br>Participants will be provided with hearing aids | Behavioral: CONTROL<br>* No specialized treatment will be provided in addition to standard of care audiology treatment provided with the provision of hearing aids<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Words-in-Noise Test (WIN) Change | Monosyllabic words (NU-6 female version) with a carrier phrase were presented auditory only in a multitalker babble.The participant is asked to repeat the last word of each phrase. The total number of correct words is input into the Spearman-Karber equation to derive a 50% point. This is the signal-to-noise ratio in dB that an individual requires to get 50% of the words correct. This test was completed at baseline and follow up visits. | Baseline, immediate post-intervention (up to 2 to 6 weeks), 6 month follow up | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Change | The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (APHAP; Cox & Alexander 1995) was used to assess activity limitations and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly or Adults (HHI; Ventry & Weinstein 1982; Newman et al. 1990) was used to assess participation restrictions. The APHAP is a 24-item questionnaire that documents hearing difficulties in specified listening situations. The items are answered on a 7-point scale from 'Always' (or 99%) to 'Never' (or 1%) with higher scores indicating greater reported hearing difficulty. The APHAP global score that ranges from 1 to 99 was used for all analyses. | Baseline, immediate post-intervention (up to 2 to 6 weeks), 6 month follow up | 
| Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHI) Change | The HHI is a 25-item questionnaire that assesses the social and emotional consequences of hearing loss. The HHI for the elderly is for individuals age 65 years and older (Ventry & Weinstein 1982); the HHI for adults is for individuals aged 64 years and younger (Newman et al. 1990). The versions differ in the wording of three questions. The participants were asked to complete the appropriate HHI for aided listening to reflect their residual hearing handicap. HHI items are answered on a scale of Yes (4 points), Sometimes (2 points) and No (0 points), with higher scores indicating greater reported hearing handicap. Total HHI scores, which can range from 0 to 100, were used for all analyses. | Baseline, immediate post-intervention (up to 2 to 6 weeks), 6 month follow up | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
auditory perception, rehabilitation of hearing impaired