Effects of Negative Affect in Individuals With Binge Eating Episodes

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Binge-eating is characterized by recurrent episodes of eating large amounts of - typically high calorie - foods, eating much more rapidly than normal and until feeling uncomfortably full, as well as feeling disgusted with oneself, depressed, or guilty after those episodes. Two eating disorders are characterized by binge-eating as central diagnostic criteria, binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN). Binge-eating episodes in BN, but not BED, are typically followed by compensatory mechanisms such as self-induced vomiting, and BED is typically associated with obesity, while BN is not. Behavior studies such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research of affect in an individual's naturalistic environment have shown that negative affect and negative urgency (the tendency to act rashly when distressed) often precede binge-eating. The Investigators want to answer the following questions: Can negative affect in BN and BED be linked to 1) altered dopamine related brain reinforcement learning, 2) to food value computation and cognitive control circuit function, and 3) can dopamine related brain activation predict eating and negative affect, indicating a brain based neurobiological vulnerability. Answering those questions will help to define binge-eating based on regulation of brain reward, cognition, and emotion circuit function and point toward potential psychopharmacological interventions to normalize brain function and behavior.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Specific Aim 1: To test on two study days, one neutral affect and one negative affect day (affect induction) whether negative affect alters brain reinforcement learning in a dopamine system anchored taste reward learning paradigm (a task for prediction error and reward value computation) during functional magnetic resonance brain imaging (fMRI). Hypothesis 1: In response to negative and compared to neutral affect induction, binge eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) will show increased positive prediction error and taste valuation regression with striatum and insula activation compared to obese (OB) and healthy control (HC) groups. This will be an indication that negative affect excessively activates dopamine related reward circuit response in BED and BN. Specific Aim 2: To study during a food choice paradigm the effects of negative affect on brain circuitry for cognitive control and food valuation. Specific Aim 2a: To study brain circuitry for food valuation in response to neutral or negative affect. Hypothesis 2a: In response to negative and compared to neutral affect induction, BED and BN groups will show greater striatal activation when rating food for taste, compared to OB and HC. This will indicate that BED and BN are associated with increased affect-regulated motivation to approach high calorie foods after negative affect induction and compared to OB and HC. Specific Aim 2b: To study brain control circuitry during food choice in response to neutral or negative affect. Hypothesis 2b: In response to negative and compared to neutral affect induction, BED and BN groups will show increased insula and striatal, but lower dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation compared to OB and HC groups. This will indicate that negative affect activates automatic food reward circuit response, but reduces cognitive control circuitry during food choice in BED and BN. Specific Aim 3: To test whether brain activation predicts food intake or negative affect. Specific Aim 3a: To test whether brain activation can predict food intake during a post-fMRI scan test meal. Hypothesis 3a: On negative- versus neutral-affect days, BN and BED will select more food in a post-fMRI scan test meal; lower DLPFC and higher striatal activation during food choice, and higher (prediction error) taste reward activation in insula and ventral striatum will predict greater food intake. Specific Aim 3b: To test whether brain activation during reward learning or food choice predicts negative affect measured by EMA on the study day, as well as measured between study days in the individual's naturalistic environment. Hypothesis 3b: Insula, ventral striatum and DLPFC activation (taste prediction error task, food choice task) during the negative affect condition will predict the intensity of negative affect immediately after fMRI, as well as intensity of negative affect episodes during the days between brain scans in the individual's naturalistic environment, suggesting a neurobiological affective vulnerability.

Official Title
-----------------
Neural Effects of Negative Affect on Food Choices and Reward In Individuals With Binge Eating Episodes

Conditions
-----------------
Bulimia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder, Obesity, Eating Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Negative Affect Task


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy Controls Age 18-55 years old Healthy body weight between 90 and 110 % average body weight since puberty. Regular monthly menstrual cycle (if applicable) Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Revised (EHI-R) LQ* score > +200 Obese Age 18-55 years old Current body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. Stable food intake regimen in previous 4 weeks. Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Revised (EHI-R) LQ* score > +200 Obese for at least one year Binge Eating Disorder Age 18-55 years old Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Revised (EHI-R) LQ* score > +200 DSM 5 diagnosis of Binge Eating Disorder A. Recurrent episodes of binge eating B. Binge eating episodes are associated with three (or more) of the following Eating much more rapidly than normal. Eating until feeling uncomfortably full. Eating large amounts of food when not feeling physically hungry. Eating alone because of embarrassment. Feeling disgusted with oneself, depressed, or very guilty after overeating. C. Marked distress regarding binge eating is present. D. At least once a week for 3 months. E. The binge eating is not associated with the recurrent use of inappropriate compensatory behavior. Bulimia Nervosa Age 18-55 years old Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Revised (EHI-R) LQ* score > +200 DSM 5 diagnosis of Bulimia Nervosa A. Recurrent episodes of binge eating Eating, in a discrete period of time, an amount of food that is definitely larger than most people would eat during a similar period of time and under similar circumstances. A sense of lack of control over eating during the episode. B. Recurrent inappropriate compensatory behavior in order to prevent weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or other medications; fasting; or excessive exercise. C. At least once a week for 3 months. D. Self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight. Exclusion Criteria: Healthy Controls Current pregnancy or breast feeding within last 3 months First degree relative with current or past eating disorder Current Medications other than BCP or IUD Past or present Axis I psychiatric disorder including substance or alcohol use disorder as determined through SCID-5 clinical interview First degree relative with an eating disorder Major Medical illness Recent history of suspected substance abuse or a lifetime history of psychostimulant abuse and/or dependence Metal implants or braces Obese Current pregnancy or breast feeding within last 3 months First degree relative with current or past eating disorder Current or previous eating disorder diagnosis Current Medications other than BCP or IUD Past or present Axis I psychiatric disorder including substance or alcohol use disorder as determined through SCID-5 clinical interview Major Medical illness Recent history of suspected substance abuse or a lifetime history of psychostimulant abuse and/or dependence Metal implants or braces Binge Eating Disorder Pregnancy or breast feeding within last 3 months Lifetime history of bipolar disorder or psychosis Use of a psychostimulant within the prior 6 months Recent history of substance abuse or dependence (except for alcohol and cannabis use) Major Medical illness Metal implants or braces Bulimia Nervosa Pregnancy or breast feeding within last 3 months Lifetime history of bipolar disorder or psychosis Use of a psychostimulant within the prior 6 months Recent history of substance abuse or dependence (except for alcohol and cannabis use) Major Medical illness Metal implants or braces

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 55 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Behavioral<br>Negative Affect Task | Behavioral: Negative Affect Task<br>* fMRI stress task<br>* Other names: Functional Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Stress Task;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Taste Reward Brain Response to Negative Affect fMRI Task | to study brain activation in a taste reward task in response to negative affect | 5 years | 
| Food Choice Brain Response to Negative Affect fMRI Task | to study brain activation in a food choice task in response to negative affect | 5 years | 
| Brain Activation and Food Intake/negative Affect Relationships | To test whether brain activation predicts food intake or negative affect | 5 years | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
fMRI, Reward, Food Choices, Negative Affect