Comparing the Stanford Letter Project Form to Traditional Advance Directives

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Our goal is to compare two types of advance directives forms available in English and Spanish to determine which is more easy to use for patients.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Step1: Any adult participant who is interested in completing advance directives and able to read and write in English and or Spanish will be eligible to participate in the study Step 2: Online Stanford consent form will be presented before the participants. Only after they read the consent and click on the participation link will they be able to enter the study.Those who are willing to participate will be randomly assigned to either the letter or traditional advance directives in Spanish and study measures. They will also answer questions as to how much they liked and understood the documents. Step 4: The investigators will collect data until the investigators reach an n=1000 Step 5: The investigators will analyze the results and submit for publication. In this protocol, we are assessing whether patients prefer the traditional advance directives or the letter directive. As it is just an questionnaire based study, there no risk for patients.

Official Title
-----------------
Comparing the Stanford Letter Project Form to Traditional Advance Directives

Conditions
-----------------
Advance Directives

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Randomized clinical study


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Over 18 years of age Exclusion Criteria: Under 18

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Other
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intervention<br>Participants in the intervention arm complete the Stanford letter advance directive | Other: Randomized clinical study<br>* Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two advance directives and we will assess which they prefer. This is not a human health intervention<br>* Other names: Advance Directive;|
| Active Comparator: Control<br>Participants in the control arm complete the California state traditional advance directive | Other: Randomized clinical study<br>* Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two advance directives and we will assess which they prefer. This is not a human health intervention<br>* Other names: Advance Directive;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ease of use of Questionnaire. more patient-centered and family oriented | It was easy to read and understand the form of advance directive .◦This is a feasibility trail. On completion of the advance directive they were assigned ( letter directive or traditional directive, we are asking questions to participants about whether the directive was clear and easy to understand). | 1year | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ease of use to describe how decisions are made | Advance form helped me to describe how decisions are made | 1year | 
| Ease of use about the type of treatment and care. | Advance form stimulated my own thinking about the type of treatment and care they wish to receive in my last days of life. | 1year | 
| Ease of use about letting my doctors about my wishes. | This form can help my doctors understand what treatments would like to receive and what not wish to receive in my last days of life ( resuscitation , respirators , artificial feeding , renal dialysis). | 1 year | 
| Ease of use if I cannot make decisions for myself then the form says it. | In the future, if I can not make decisions for myself, this form will help my family / friends understand exactly what treatments ( resuscitation , respirators , artificial feeding , renal dialysis) would like to receive and what treatments do not wish to receive so they can make decisions medical for me. | 1 year | 
| Ease of use about my future preferences. | There were issues with my future preferences that were not covered in the form of advance directive . | 1 year | 
| Ease of use of the form itself. | I feel comfortable using form for advance care planning . | 1 year | 
| Ease of use and the comments participants may have. | Any comments participants may have about the form of advance directive ? What can investigators do for patients and their families understand it better? | 1 year |