Study Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy With Robot-assisted Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of the study to compare two established methods of radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with bladder cancer. The participants will be treated under conditions in alignment with up-to-date guidelines and care. We wish to investigate whether it is feasible to compare the two methods under conditions of the highest methodological quality.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Radical cystectomy (RC) is a comprehensive surgery including pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. The surgery is originally performed as an open procedure (ORC) but with advances in technology the procedure is now also offered as a robot-assisted laparoscopic procedure (RARC). It remains questionable if RARC is superior to ORC in terms of surgical outcomes. Several studies have described outcomes following RARC of which most are comparative studies with only five studies being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall, significant differences in operating room time, estimated blood loss, time to flatus and bowel movement as well as use of morphine sulfate equivalents in favor of RARC has been demonstrated with the exception of operating room time. However, no studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in risk of 30- or 90-day complication rates between ORC and RARC. The RCTs have not been blinded, and therefore may be subject to bias in terms of expectations from patients and care providers. Also, in the already conducted RCTs of ORC versus RARC the urinary diversion has been done extracorporally. Today, it is possible to conduct the whole procedure of RARC intracorporally (iRARC), potentially reducing the surgical stress further. Lastly, the previously conducted RCTs have not consequently been managed under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) setup. Currently, a multicenter study comparing ORC with RARC is recruiting in the United Kingdom in which the patients are treated with iRARC and under an ERAS setup. The present study will compare the two methods blinded for the participants and all health care providers involved in the postoperative care from the time the patient exits the operating room (OR). Blinded studies in surgery are rare but in gastrointestinal surgery, a blinded study of open versus laparoscopic colonic resection has demonstrated to be feasible and thus we believe that such study must be feasible in an RC setting. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either ORC or RARC. Blinding: The study is blinded for the patient and for the group of nurses and doctors that will be responsible for the postoperative care. The postoperative care will be managed by members of the bladder cancer team other than the operating surgeon, and OR staff will not be involved in the postoperative care. The abdominal wound will be bandaged to hide the wounds from both an open and laparoscopic procedure. The blinding will be maintained until discharge from hospital.

Official Title
-----------------
A Controlled Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study of Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporal Urinary Diversion (iRARC) Under an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Setup

Conditions
-----------------
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Radical Cystectomy


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: age> 18 non-metastatic disease fit for both ORC and RARC Patient-selected urinary diversion: ileal conduit Exclusion Criteria: if not able to speak/understand Danish not able to cooperate for fully informed consent need for extensive concomitant surgery (i.e. nephroureterectomy) prior down staging chemotherapy (prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy accepted) prior radiation therapy prior major extensive abdominal or pelvic surgery prior peritonitis conditions contraindicating extended Trendelenburg's position

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC)<br>Open radical cystectomy includes in both genders removal of the bladder and distal ureters as well as pelvic lymphadenectomy. In men the procedure includes removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and in women removal of the uterus, ovaries, urethra and part of the vagina. Lastly, for both genders an iliac conduit urinary diversion is performed. | Procedure: Radical Cystectomy<br>* Participants are randomly and blinded assigned<br>|
| Active Comparator: Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (iRARC)<br>Robot-assisted radical cystectomy includes in both genders removal of the bladder and distal ureters as well as pelvic lymphadenectomy. In men the procedure includes removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and in women removal of the uterus, ovaries, urethra and part of the vagina. Lastly, for both genders an intracorporeal iliac conduit urinary diversion is performed. | Procedure: Radical Cystectomy<br>* Participants are randomly and blinded assigned<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Participants blinded at discharge | Number of patients that was not unblinded at discharge | 12 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Length of Stay (LOS) | Duration (days) of primary hospitalization. From the date of admission until the date of discharge from hospital. | 12 months | 
| Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) | Number of days alive and out of hospital within 90 days from surgery | 90 days from surgery | 
| 30-day complication rate | Complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) | 30 days after surgery | 
| 90-day complication rate | Complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) | 90 days after surgery | 
| Readmission rate | Number of readmissions | 90 days after surgery | 
| Quality of Life (QoL): EORTC QLQ-C30 | Registration of differences in QoL. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 (scale range 0-100, a higher score indicating better quality of life)) | 90 days after surgery | 
| Quality of Life (QoL): EORTC QLQ-BLM30 | Registration of differences in QoL. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (QLQ-BLM30 (scale range 0-100, a higher score indicating increase in symptom burden)) will be used. | 90 days after surgery | 
| Blood loss | Both estimated as well as calculated/hidden blood loss | 4 days after surgery | 
| Use of opioids | Use of opioids, mg total postoperatively | until diacharge or up to 90 days, whichever comes first | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Bladder Cancer, Radical cystectomy