Intervention Media to Prevent Adolescent Cyber-conflict Through Technology

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this randomized pilot trial is to test the feasibility of online recruitment and intervention delivery of the same Intervention to Prevent Cyber-victimization among Adolescents through Text-Messaging (iPACT) intervention content, delivered via mobile app (instead of SMS). This study includes a brief remote introductory session, followed by eight weeks of daily, tailored two-way messages, with an 8-week assessment. If successful, the IMPACT intervention will demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of an easily disseminable intervention to improve wellness and resilience among at-risk youth and their social network.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Cyber-bullying, defined as intentional harm of others through computers, cellphones, and other electronic devices, is increasingly common. Approximately one quarter of American adolescents report that they have been cyber-victims in the past year (with rates ranging from 6-72%, depending on the study). Being a victim of cyber-bullying is strongly associated with multiple negative consequences. Cyber-victimization predicts depressive symptoms and suicidality; it correlates with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms, alcohol and other drug use, physical peer violence, and dating violence. Emotional regulation skills and positive social supports may be protective. Development of an acceptable, effective, and potentially disseminable secondary prevention tool, to decrease both the frequency and consequences of cyber-victimization, is therefore of high public health importance. Effective, acceptable, and easily disseminable secondary prevention tools are needed to improve adolescent resilience and reduce the negative effects of cybervictimization. Ninety-five percent of adolescents have access to a smartphone. Our team recently conducted an NICHD-funded pilot of an in-person brief intervention + automated 8-week interactive text-message program (iPACT), to reduce cyber-victimization among youth recruited in a pediatric clinic. Pilot testing of iPACT showed high acceptability (89% responses to daily messages), and preliminary signals of efficacy (e.g. improved use of bystander behaviors). However, our team identified two elements for improvement. First, the in-person brief intervention was difficult to deliver during a clinic visit due to patients' time limitations. Second, our and others' work suggests that at-risk youth are more commonly witnesses of cyber-victimization, than victims themselves, and therefore need greater content focused on bystander intervention. Third, at-risk youth may be more easily identified online than in person. Participants will be identified through targeted Instagram advertisements. If eligible, participants will complete an online assent form followed by a series of comprehensive questions to assess for capacity to assent. Participants will complete a baseline assessment and will be randomized to experimental (IMPACT, n=40) or connection to Enhance Online Resources (EOR, n=40). This study will pilot an enhanced intervention, IMPACT is a two-part remotely-delivered intervention for youth reporting online victimization, derived from iPACT's existing structure, to promote pro-social behavior and enhance wellness among at-risk adolescents. We will deliver a brief, computer-guided discussion (an adaptation of iPACT's in-person intervention) remotely via video chat; and deliver 8 weeks of automated, enhanced message content that helps participants identify, intervene in, and effectively reduce the impact of witnessed or experienced cyberbullying. EOR group participants will receive standardized information on cyberbullying. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 week to measure cyberbullying, peer violence, and cognitive/behavioral skill sets. At the 8 week follow-up, we will assess for efficacy, acceptability, usability, and feasibility through standardized qualitative and quantitative measures.

Official Title
-----------------
Intervention Media to Prevent Adolescent Cyber-conflict Through Technology

Conditions
-----------------
Cyberbullying

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: IMPACT Intervention
* Other: Control: Enhanced Online Resources (EOR)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: reside in the US being English-speaking having a English-speaking parent active Instagram account self-reporting cyber-victimization (defined as endorsing >1 past-year episode of technology mediated victimization) Exclusion Criteria: being cognitively unable to take part in the intervention as determined by study staff

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 13 Years
Maximum Age: 17 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: IMPACT Intervention<br>Remote brief video session, introducing basic principles of cognitive behavioral theory and the structure of the mobile application message portion of the intervention. Eight-weeks longitudinal tailored Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based messaging program | Behavioral: IMPACT Intervention<br>* Brief remote session + tailored, daily 8-week mobile application facilitated messaging secondary prevention intervention.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Control Enhanced Online Resources (EOR)<br>1. We will provide a link to an online resource packet with information on bullying and mental health resources. | Other: Control: Enhanced Online Resources (EOR)<br>* EOR group participants will receive standardized information on cyberbullying.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intervention Acceptability: Enrollment Rate | % of eligible participants who consented and completed enrollment | Baseline | 
| Intervention Acceptability: Participant Satisfaction | % of participants that agree or strongly agree on the quantitative acceptability assessment and qualitative interviews | 8 week post-enrollment | 
| Intervention Feasibility: Participant Engagement | % of intervention participants that complete study components including responding to at least one of the daily message queries, and how many requested on-demand support messages | Baseline to 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cyber-victimization and related online behaviors | Change in University of New Hampshire Internet Safety Education Survey (UNH) from enrollment other forms (cyberbullying); investigators selected 5 items from the survey to measure. Items are scored by participants' self-report of online harassment experiences ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (7 or more times). Possible score range of 0-20, with higher scores indicating greater number of online harassment experiences. | Baseline, 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention), 16 weeks post-enrollment | 
| Psychological stress | Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); Four items are scored by participants' self-report of Psychological Stress ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The raw score ranges from 4 to 20, 4 representing least and 20 representing most psychological stress. | Baseline, 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention), 16 weeks post-enrollment | 
| Positive affect | Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); Four items are scored by participants' self-report of Positive Affect ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The raw score ranges from 4 to 20, 4 representing least and 20 representing most positive affect. | Baseline, 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention), 16 weeks post-enrollment | 
| Well-being Index | The World Health Organization- Five- Well-Being Index (WHO-5 ) from enrollment other forms (well-being); Five items are scored by participants' self-report of well-being ranging from 0 (At no time) to 5 (All of the time). The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life. | Baseline, 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention), 16 weeks post-enrollment | 
| Theoretical mechanisms of prosocial behaviors and self-efficacy | Change in Bystander Intervention in Bullying Measures; 5 items from the Bystander Intervention in Bullying Measures and 8 items from the University of New Hampshire Internet Safety Education Survey. Items are scored by participants' self-report of online bystander behavior ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Possible score range of 13-65, with higher scores indicating greater personal responsibility/self-efficacy to intervene when witnessing online harassment experiences (prosocial behavior and self-efficacy). | Baseline, 8 weeks post-enrollment (close of intervention), 16 weeks post-enrollment | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
cyber-victimization, mobile application, mhealth, remote intervention