Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Cyclosporine may help irinotecan work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Panitumumab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether irinotecan is more effective when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying irinotecan to compare how well it works when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that did not respond to fluorouracil.

Detailed Description
-----------------
OBJECTIVES: Primary Compare the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) vs Ir with cyclosporine (IrC) in patients with fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. Compare the efficacy of single-agent Ir vs Ir with panitumumab (IrP) in these patients. Secondary Correlate the toxicity of Ir and/or IrC with genetic variability in the enzymes involved in irinotecan hydrochloride's disposition pathway. Compare IrC to Ir and its metabolites (SN38; SN38G), in terms of pharmacokinetic profile. Correlate the benefit of IrP with tumor expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its known down-stream molecules as a predictive measure. Correlate IrP efficacy or toxicity (specifically the severity of skin rash) with somatic alterations in the EGFR gene and/or with germline variability in related genes. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior cetuximab (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Arm II: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 15-40 minutes on day 1 and oral cyclosporine three times a day on days 1-3. Arm III: Patients receive panitumumab IV over 30-90 minutes followed by irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Single-agent panitumumab may be continued during breaks in chemotherapy treatment. In all arms, treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with responding or stable disease may continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks for 1 year. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,269 patients will be accrued for this study.

Official Title
-----------------
A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)]

Conditions
-----------------
Colorectal Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Biological: panitumumab
* Drug: cyclosporine
* Drug: irinotecan hydrochloride


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria: Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor Unidimensionally measurable disease Disease progression during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: WHO performance status 0-2 Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL WBC > 3,000/mm³ Platelet count > 100,000/mm³ Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA clearance > 60 mL/min Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN No history of Gilbert's syndrome Not pregnant or nursing Negative pregnancy test Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer) No unresolved bowel obstruction, uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause No recent history of seizures No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, Capable of reliable oral self-medication No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable for participation in this study PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: See Disease Characteristics No major thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks No prior irinotecan hydrochloride No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following: Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride Fluvoxamine

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 120 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Biological: panitumumab|nan|
|Drug: cyclosporine|nan|
|Drug: irinotecan hydrochloride|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks |  |  | 
| Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab |  |  | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC |  |  | 
| Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC |  |  | 
| Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC |  |  | 
| Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab |  |  | 
| Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab |  |  | 
| Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab |  |  | 
| Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab |  |  | 
| Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab |  |  | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
recurrent colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, adenocarcinoma of the rectum