Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategy for Fast Track Lung Cancer Diagnosis

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Annually, 4,200 new cases of lung cancer are diagnosed in Denmark. The stage of the disease is an important prognostic factor as an advanced stage reduces the opportunity for surgical intervention and other curative treatment. In denmark, as in many other countries, a fast track evaluation for lung cancer has been introduced in 2008. When the general practitioners refer patients through the fast track, the majority of patients make their first visit to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine. After this visit, further investigation is initiated, which is often a CT scan of the chest and the upper abdomen. We dont know Whether this is the most appropriate organisation. The aim of this project is to evaluate the way lung cancer patients are examined through the fast track and the impact of chest CT before an evaluation by a chest physician. Investigators want to randomise all patients referred for the existing fast track to either direct CT scan of chest and upper abdomen or to evaluation by the chest physician, in order to test: A) Fast track performance measured by number of CT scans and chest physician specialist time per diagnosis, and whether there is a difference between the intervention and the control group.

Official Title
-----------------
Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategy for Fast Track Lung Cancer Diagnosis. A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Conditions
-----------------
Lung Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Radiation: CT scan before chest physician
* Radiation: Usual diagnostic workup


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: All patients referred to fast track evaluation (lung department, Aarhus university hospital) from primary care. Exclusion Criteria: Not referred from general practice
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: CT scan before chest physician<br>CT scan before chest physician | Radiation: CT scan before chest physician<br>* Patients referred to department of lung medicine are randomised according to the month of birth. Patients born in even months are CT scan before a consultation with a chest physician<br>|
| Active Comparator: Usual diagnostic workup<br>Usual diagnostic workup | Radiation: Usual diagnostic workup<br>* Patients born in odd months seen in the department of lung medicine by a chest physician and maybe then CT scanned (usual workup practice according to the fast track evaluation)<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Chest physician time | Time (in minutes) spent by a chest physician pr patient | 2013 | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Satisfaction with new organisation | Measured with a qualitative focus interview with staff a the Department of lung medicine (doctors, nurses and secretary). | 2013 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Organization, of fast track