Study to Compare Feasibility of 1-step Injectable Artesunate vs. Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The objectives of this study contains 3 parts: (1) a comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate (AS) versus conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times in two countries, (2) a quantification of convenience and costs of the new 1-step artesunate parenteral formulation versus the conventional formulation in a randomised study, (3) A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, and drug replacement. The conventional formulation of injectable artesunate requires a 2-step reconstitution and dilution of the artesunate hemisuccinate powder. A new formulation of injectable artesunate has been developed by Fosun Pharma requiring a simpler 1-step reconstitution. Bioequivalence of the new formulation to the conventional formulation. For part 1, a total number of participants of this study would be 200 participants, estimated 100 per site will be recruited. For part 2, a total number of 40 semi-structured interviews with study staff, health staff, policy makers, and stake holders; and survey/questionnaires with 150 health staff.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Study design: Part 1 A comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times of 1-step parenteral artesunate to conventional artesunate in 2 countries. Patients with severe malaria will be enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment with conventional injectable artesunate or 1-step injectable artesunate. A physical examination will be performed daily and every six hours on indication. Vital signs rec-orded hourly for unstable patients, then 6 hourly for stabilised patients, and at each follow-up visit. A symptom questionnaire will be taken daily to help identify adverse events. Patients will be asked to come back for a follow-up visit at day 7, 14, 21 and 28. Patients will not be followed up longer. In case of unresolved important sequelae at day 28, the patient will be followed and treated longer in order to provide the appropriate clinical care. A Time and Motion study will record the time to prepare the artesunate solution for injection and administer treatment, number of actions performed to prepare treatment, and consumables used. Clinical, parasitological, and laboratory assessments will be recorded while patients are admitted in hospital and then weekly up to day 28 to assess recovery and determine final status. Part 2 A mixed method social science study that entails semi-structure interviews and survey with study staff (involved in part 1), health workers (who treat severe malaria) and policymakers and stakeholders (who are involved in devising national malaria policy and its implementation), to assess the acceptability, feasibility, pros and cons, costs, and logistics and training implications of 1-step artesunate vs conventional artesunate. For both sites, semi-structure interviews will be conducted with minimum of a total of 40 respondents consisting of study staff, health staff and policy makers and stakeholders. The ultimate sample for semi-structure interviews will be dependent on the data saturation. For survey/questionnaire, a maximum number of relevant participants (study staff and health care staff) will be attempted to be recruited from two sites. A minimum of 150 study staff and health care staff will be recruited in the survey. Part 3 A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 & Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, drug replacement. In addition to time measurement, the observer will also record the resources used for the administration of artesunate. This will include the vials themselves, as well as other consumables required for the administration (syringes, needles, catheters, etc.). Funder: Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Industrial Development Co., Ltd

Official Title
-----------------
Convenience and Cost-aspects of a New 1-step Reconstitution Injectable Artesunate Compared to Conventional 2-step Injectable Artesunate for the Treatment of Severe Falciparum Malaria: a Multi-centre Study

Conditions
-----------------
Severe Malaria

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: Argesun 60mg (1 step parenteral artesunate)
* Drug: Artesun 60mg (2-step parenteral artesunate)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion criteria Part 1: Male and female children aged >3months and <16 years. Clinical diagnosis of severe P. falciparum malaria; or parasitological confirmed P. falciparum hyperparasitaemia >350,000/ uL. Positive malaria test result, by rapid diagnostic test RDT. Weight of 5 kg or greater. Written informed consent by the parent or guardian. Part 2: Study staff and health staff Study staff who prepare and administer Artesunate injection to patients in the study or health staff who have not administer the Artesunate injection to patients in the study by themselves but are either aware of malaria treatment, Artesunate injection, or have observed the treat-ment provided to severe malaria patients. Written informed consent by the study staff and health staff Study staff for a short video-record Study staff who would like to participate in the video record of a procedure to show how 1-step and 2-step Artesunate injections are prepared and administered. Written informed consent by the study staff Policymakers and stakeholders Those who are working in the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) or relevant organizations (WHO, INGOs/NGOs) within the country. Written informed consent by the potential participant Exclusion criteria Part 1: Participation in other intervention studies Known allergy to artemisinin derivatives. Known history of parenteral treatment for severe malaria for the current episode of illness before admission. Treatment before admission with an oral antimalarial drug (used for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria) or a single dose of pre-referral rectal artesunate are not exclusion criteria. Part 2: Study staff and health staff; Policymakers and stakeholders; Study staff and health staff for a short video-record Unwilling to participate in the study Unable to communicate

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 3 Months
Maximum Age: 16 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: 1-step Artesunate parenteral arm<br>Argesun (Artesunate 60 mg) | Drug: Argesun 60mg (1 step parenteral artesunate)<br>* Each vial of powder contains 60mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 6 ml solvent contains: sodium bicarbonate 8.4mg/ml; arginine 20mg/ml.<br>|
| Experimental: 2-step Artesunate parenteral arm<br>Artesun (Artesunate 60 mg) | Drug: Artesun 60mg (2-step parenteral artesunate)<br>* Each vial of powder contains 60 mg artesunate. Each ampoule of 1 ml solvent contains 50 mg sodium bicarbonate. Each ampoule of 5 ml diluent contains 45 mg sodium chloride.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations | Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations (by time-and-motion methods). | 3 days | 
| Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations | Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations at health facility, and at health system level. | 3 days | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Implementation perspective assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate | Implementation perspective assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders | 45 minutes | 
| Practicability assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate | Practicability assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders | 45 minutes | 
| Satisfaction assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate | Satisfaction assessment of 1-step formulation of parenteral artesunate by interview study staff, health staff, and policymakers and stakeholders | 45 minutes | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Parenteral artesunate