Effectiveness of Pediatric Intubation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
We hypothesized that the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) is beneficial for intubation of pediatric manikins while performing CPR. In the current study, we compared effectiveness of the Venner videolaryngoscope (A.P. Advance™) and MIL laryngoscopes in child resuscitation with and without CC.

Official Title
-----------------
Comparison of the Venner(TM) A.P. Advance(TM) With the Macintosh Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in a Standardized Airway Manikin With and Without Chest Compressions by Nurses. A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial.

Conditions
-----------------
Cardiac Arrest

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Venner
* Device: Miller


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Give voluntary consent to participate in the study minimum 1 year of work experience in nursing Exclusion Criteria: Not meet the above criteria Wrist or Low back diseases

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intubation without chest compressions<br>Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation without chest compressions. | Device: Venner<br>* Video-laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: The Venner A.P. Advance Video Laryngoscope;Device: Miller<br>* Direct-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Miller Laryngoscope;|
| Experimental: Intubation with uninterrupted chest compressions<br>Endotracheal intubation of pediatric mannikin during resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions. In order to simulate the difficulties associated with intubation during uninterrupted chest compressions, CPR was performed by using LUCAS-2 (Physio-Control, Redmond, WA, U.S.). | Device: Venner<br>* Video-laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: The Venner A.P. Advance Video Laryngoscope;Device: Miller<br>* Direct-Laryngoscopy<br>* Other names: Miller Laryngoscope;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Success of intubation | effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants | 1 MONTH | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intubation time | time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt | 1 MONTH | 
| POGO score | self-reported percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score | 1 MONTH | 
| Cormack-Lehane grading | self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4) | 1 MONTH | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
intubation