Evolution of Facial Trauma During COVID Containment Measures

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The COVID-19 global pandemic has led to a major professional and social national reorganization: professional because it involves a redeployment of medical staff and material resources, and social because it imposes prolonged containment measures on an entire population. The maxillofacial trauma activity is mainly linked to sports or leisure accidents, fights and road accidents. It seems to appear since the beginning of containment measures a significant drop in maxillofacial trauma activity at the national level, which, if it is demonstrated in a significant way in several French hospital centers, would allow to redeploy the material and human resources related to this activity on sectors in tension due to the pandemic.

Detailed Description
-----------------
This study will compare maxillo-facial activity during the first month of COVID-19 containment measures in France with a comparable period in 2018 and 2019. This comparison will be made in 10 major French hospital centers.

Official Title
-----------------
Evolution of Maxillofacial Trauma Activity During COVID-19 Containment Measures: a French Multicentric Comparative Observational Study

Conditions
-----------------
Maxillofacial Injuries, Skull Fractures, COVID-19

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Facial fractures reduction or osteosynthesis


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion criteria: Maxillo-facial fracture Requiring Trauma that occured between March 16 and April 15, 2020 or 2018 or 2019 All ages Exclusion criteria: Patients who refused the collection of their data
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| contained patients<br>contained patients | Procedure: Facial fractures reduction or osteosynthesis<br>* Facial fractures reduction or osteosynthesis<br>|
| Comparative patients<br>Comparative patients | Procedure: Facial fractures reduction or osteosynthesis<br>* Facial fractures reduction or osteosynthesis<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| evolution of number of maxillofacial trauma | evolution of number of maxillofacial trauma during COVID-19 first month of containment measures compared to the same period in 2018 and 2019.the number of patients from different investigator centers operated for a facial fracture occurring between March 16, 2020 and April 15, 2020 will be compared to the number of patients in these same centers operated for a facial fracture during the same period in 2018 and in 2019. A sub-group analysis, by center, will also be carried out. | 1 year | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| variability in terms of type of trauma | study of variability in terms of type of trauma with and without confinement. | 1 year | 
| Comparative assessment of types of trauma by the inter-regional variability | Comparative assessment of types of trauma by the inter-regional variability : study of the inter-regional variability of maxillofacial trauma | 1 year | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Containment, Quarenteen, Pandemics, Maxillofacial fractures, Facial trauma, Outbreak