Chronic Malnutrition and Oral Health Status in Children Aged One to Five Years

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Malnutrition is a public health problem that can exert a negative impact on the general and oral health of children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of chronic malnutrition on the oral health of children aged one to five years. An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Nutritional Recovery Center and involved 82 children between 12 and 71 months of age. Nutritional status was evaluated using anthropometric indicators and oral health status was measured using the dmft index. Non-stimulated saliva was collected. Flow rate and buffering capacity was then measured with the aid of a pH meter.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Malnutrition is a public health problem that can exert a negative impact on the general and oral health of children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of chronic malnutrition on the oral health of children aged one to five years. An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Nutritional Recovery Center and involved 82 children between 12 and 71 months of age. Nutritional status was evaluated using anthropometric indicators. The children were weighed on a previously calibrated electronic scale (capacity: 150 kg; precision: 100 g) barefoot and wearing light clothing in the presence of the mother or caregiver. Height was determined using a non-flexible metric tape (maximum length: 2 m; precision: 0.1 cm). Each measurement was made twice and the mean was used for the calculation height for age, weight for height and weight for age. The guidelines of the World Health Organization, were the reference for the evaluation of nutritional status. Oral health status was measured using the dmft index. The criteria adopted for the determination of prevalence followed by guidelines of the Oral Health Surveys - Basic Methods, 4th edition - described in the examiner's manual and annotator's manual produced by the coordination team of the Brazil Oral Health Project. Non-stimulated saliva was collected and Flow rate and buffering capacity was then measured with the aid of a pH meter. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity.

Official Title
-----------------
Chronic Malnutrition and Oral Health Status in Children Aged One to Five Years

Conditions
-----------------
Malnutrition, Child

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Diagnostic Test: Caries detection - dmtf index
* Diagnostic Test: Saliva flow rate
* Diagnostic Test: Saliva Buffering Capacity


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Children aged one to five years enrolled at the Center for Educational and Nutrition Recovery. Statement of informed consent signed by parents/guardians. Clinical diagnosis of malnutrition. Exclusion Criteria: Children aged one to five years not enrolled at the Center for Educational and Nutrition Recovery. Children whose Parents/guardians did not sign a statement of informed consent.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 12 Months
Maximum Age: 71 Months

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Adequate nutritional status<br>Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index. Active visible white spots were also recorded. Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. After the measurement of salivary flow, an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). | Diagnostic Test: Caries detection - dmtf index<br>* Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index, which was employed following the recommendations of the WHO to establish the prevalence and severity of caries. Active visible white spots were also recorded. The examinations were performed in duplicate for each child with the aim of establishing inter-examiner agreement using the Kappa statistic which demonstrated good agreement (K = 0.81). The criteria adopted for the determination of prevalence followed by guidelines of the Oral Health Surveys - Basic Methods, 4th edition (WHO, 1997) described in the examiner's manual and annotator's manual produced by the coordination team of the Brazil Oral Health Project. The severity and prevalence of dental caries were determined based on the dmft index.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva flow rate<br>* Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes using two aspirator tubes connected to a 15-ml Falcon tube. One aspirator tube was positioned under the child's tongue and the other was attached to the aspirator device. After five minutes, the amount of saliva was measured for the determination of salivary flow. Collections were performed between 9 and 11 am and the time of the last meal was recorded. At least a one-hour interval was required between the last meal and the collection of the saliva sample. The volume of saliva was measured. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva Buffering Capacity<br>* an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). The saliva/acid solution was shaken in a q 220 vortex tube agitator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 15 seconds. Next, pH was determined in a portable pH meter (KASVI K39-0014P, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) for the determination of the SBC. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity.<br>|
| Mild malnutrition<br>Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index. Active visible white spots were also recorded. Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. After the measurement of salivary flow, an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). | Diagnostic Test: Caries detection - dmtf index<br>* Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index, which was employed following the recommendations of the WHO to establish the prevalence and severity of caries. Active visible white spots were also recorded. The examinations were performed in duplicate for each child with the aim of establishing inter-examiner agreement using the Kappa statistic which demonstrated good agreement (K = 0.81). The criteria adopted for the determination of prevalence followed by guidelines of the Oral Health Surveys - Basic Methods, 4th edition (WHO, 1997) described in the examiner's manual and annotator's manual produced by the coordination team of the Brazil Oral Health Project. The severity and prevalence of dental caries were determined based on the dmft index.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva flow rate<br>* Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes using two aspirator tubes connected to a 15-ml Falcon tube. One aspirator tube was positioned under the child's tongue and the other was attached to the aspirator device. After five minutes, the amount of saliva was measured for the determination of salivary flow. Collections were performed between 9 and 11 am and the time of the last meal was recorded. At least a one-hour interval was required between the last meal and the collection of the saliva sample. The volume of saliva was measured. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva Buffering Capacity<br>* an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). The saliva/acid solution was shaken in a q 220 vortex tube agitator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 15 seconds. Next, pH was determined in a portable pH meter (KASVI K39-0014P, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) for the determination of the SBC. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity.<br>|
| Moderate malnutrition<br>Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index. Active visible white spots were also recorded. Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. After the measurement of salivary flow, an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). | Diagnostic Test: Caries detection - dmtf index<br>* Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index, which was employed following the recommendations of the WHO to establish the prevalence and severity of caries. Active visible white spots were also recorded. The examinations were performed in duplicate for each child with the aim of establishing inter-examiner agreement using the Kappa statistic which demonstrated good agreement (K = 0.81). The criteria adopted for the determination of prevalence followed by guidelines of the Oral Health Surveys - Basic Methods, 4th edition (WHO, 1997) described in the examiner's manual and annotator's manual produced by the coordination team of the Brazil Oral Health Project. The severity and prevalence of dental caries were determined based on the dmft index.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva flow rate<br>* Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes using two aspirator tubes connected to a 15-ml Falcon tube. One aspirator tube was positioned under the child's tongue and the other was attached to the aspirator device. After five minutes, the amount of saliva was measured for the determination of salivary flow. Collections were performed between 9 and 11 am and the time of the last meal was recorded. At least a one-hour interval was required between the last meal and the collection of the saliva sample. The volume of saliva was measured. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva Buffering Capacity<br>* an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). The saliva/acid solution was shaken in a q 220 vortex tube agitator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 15 seconds. Next, pH was determined in a portable pH meter (KASVI K39-0014P, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) for the determination of the SBC. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity.<br>|
| Severe malnutrition<br>Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index. Active visible white spots were also recorded. Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. After the measurement of salivary flow, an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). | Diagnostic Test: Caries detection - dmtf index<br>* Dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index, which was employed following the recommendations of the WHO to establish the prevalence and severity of caries. Active visible white spots were also recorded. The examinations were performed in duplicate for each child with the aim of establishing inter-examiner agreement using the Kappa statistic which demonstrated good agreement (K = 0.81). The criteria adopted for the determination of prevalence followed by guidelines of the Oral Health Surveys - Basic Methods, 4th edition (WHO, 1997) described in the examiner's manual and annotator's manual produced by the coordination team of the Brazil Oral Health Project. The severity and prevalence of dental caries were determined based on the dmft index.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva flow rate<br>* Samples of non-stimulated saliva were collected from the participants for five minutes using two aspirator tubes connected to a 15-ml Falcon tube. One aspirator tube was positioned under the child's tongue and the other was attached to the aspirator device. After five minutes, the amount of saliva was measured for the determination of salivary flow. Collections were performed between 9 and 11 am and the time of the last meal was recorded. At least a one-hour interval was required between the last meal and the collection of the saliva sample. The volume of saliva was measured. The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow.<br>Diagnostic Test: Saliva Buffering Capacity<br>* an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). The saliva/acid solution was shaken in a q 220 vortex tube agitator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 15 seconds. Next, pH was determined in a portable pH meter (KASVI K39-0014P, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) for the determination of the SBC. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Weight Measurement | The children were weighed on a previously calibrated electronic scale (capacity: 150 kg; precision: 100 g) barefoot and wearing light clothing in the presence of the mother or caregiver. | 4 weeks | 
| Height Measurement | Height was determined using a non-flexible metric tape (maximum length: 2 m; precision: 0.1 cm). | 4 weeks | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluation of dental caries | Dental Caries - dental caries experience was recorded using the dmft index, which was employed following the recommendations of the WHO (WHO, 2007) to establish the prevalence and severity of caries. | 2 weeks | 
| Evaluation of saliva flow rate | saliva flow rate - The salivary flow volume was calculated and expressed as ml/min. The following categories were considered in the analysis of salivary flow: < 0.1 ml/min = xerostomia; 0.1 to 0.6 ml/min = very low flow; 0.7 to 0.9 mL/min low flow; 1.0 to 2.0 ml/min = normal flow; and > 2.0 ml/min = high flow. | 4 weeks | 
| Evaluation of saliva buffering capacity | salivary buffering capacity - an aliquot of 1 ml was transferred to a test tube with 3 ml of hydrochloric acid (HCl 5 mM) for titration and the determination of salivary buffering capacity (SBC). The saliva/acid solution was shaken in a q 220 vortex tube agitator (Quimis, Diadema, SP, Brazil) for 15 seconds. Next, pH was determined in a portable pH meter (KASVI K39-0014P, Curitiba, PR, Brazil) for the determination of the SBC. The following categories were considered: ≥ 5.5 = very good buffering capacity; 5.4 to 5.0 = good buffering capacity; 4.9 to 4.5 = medium good buffering capacity; 4.4 to 4.0 = low buffering capacity; and ≤ 3.9 very low buffering capacity . | 4 weeks | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
dental caries, saliva, child