linjc16/ctgov huggingface dataset:
Physiological Variables and Rowing Performance.

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the changes in physiological variables based on fitness testing and the changes in rowing performance.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The literature has shown that both aerobic capacity and anaerobic capacity are important for exercise performance in rowing. Simple fitness tests (e.g., the modified Wingate test and the graded exercise test) have been validated to examine aerobic and anaerobic capacities in rowers. However, it remains unclear whether these fitness tests can be used to track rowing performance changes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the changes in fitness test outcomes and the changes in rowing performance. The investigators expect that improvements in rowing performance are closely related to improvements in fitness test outcomes. Participants will attend two sessions of fitness testing, one in the fall 2020 and one in the spring 2021. Each session will include the modified Wingate test to examine anaerobic capacity, the graded exercise test to examine the aerobic capacity, and the 2,000-meter rowing test on rowing ergometers to assess rowing performance. Modified Wingate test: After 3 minutes of warm-up at 40-50% of heart rate reserve, the participants will perform 30 seconds of rowing at maximal effort on the rowing ergometer. Graded exercise test: Workload will start from 25 Watts and it will be increased by 25 Watts by each stage until exhaustion. Each stage includes 2 minutes of rowing and 1 minute of rest. 2,000-meter rowing test: A 2,000-meter race simulation will be performed using an indoor rowing ergometer.

Official Title
-----------------
Can Aerobic and Anaerobic Fitness Tests be Used to Track Rowing Performance Changes in Collegiate Rowers?

Conditions
-----------------
Water Sports

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: • Collegiate rowers Exclusion Criteria: Cardiovascular diseases Pulmonary diseases Metabolic diseases Other contraindications to exercise

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rowing performance | Time to complete the 2,000-meter indoor rowing test | six months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maximal oxygen consumption | The highest oxygen consumption during a graded exercise test. | six months | 
| Maximal anaerobic power | The maximal power output during a 30-second anaerobic test. | six months |
Subjective Image Quality in Stereoscopic Image Modifications

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Humans attain binocular vision from the two retinal images of both eyes through a series of sensory and motor processes that culminate in the perception of stereoscopic depth. Looking at a scene creates two slightly different images on the retinas which is due to the eyes' different positions on the head. This so called binocular disparity provides information to calculate depth and therefore enables stereopsis. Physiologically the two retinal images are superimposed and merge into one stereoscopic image. If one image is presented to one eye in an experimental setting, and a completely different image is presented to the other eye, the investigators visual system, analogous to diplopic vision, is not able to fuse these image stimuli. Instead, a phenomenon called binocular rivalry occurs. Here, both images are seen alternating and the brain can switch back and forth between these images. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of objective changes to image quality on the investigators subjective stereoscopic perception. This psychophysiological testing is done by looking at different images and thereafter by subjective grading of the image quality. The investigators hypothesize that overlapping image modifications occurring in both eyes are detected immediately, but changes, that are rotated by 90 degrees against each other, should be suppressed and result in one stereoscopic image, reduced in image quality. Whether this also accounts for more detailed images, such as reading cards, is questionable.

Conditions
-----------------
Stereoscopic Vision

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women aged between 18 and 35 years, nonsmokers Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically irrelevant Normal ophthalmic findings, emmetropia or ≤ 1 diopter Exclusion Criteria: Regular use of medication, abuse of alcoholic beverages, participation in a clinical trial in the 3 weeks preceding the study Treatment in the previous 3 weeks with any drug (except oral contraceptives) Symptoms of a clinically relevant illness in the 3 weeks before the first study day

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 35 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
Satisfaction Survey for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Patients Comparing Rooms With and Without Assistive Technology

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is : To assess the ALS patient's satisfaction related to a hospital stay on the neurology floor of Hahnemann Hospital. To compare the reported satisfaction of those individuals who stayed in a standard hospital room with those who stayed in Room 1455. Room 1455 is a room specifically set up with assistive technology related to environmental controls for individuals with disabilities. To look at frequency of use of the various pieces of adaptive equipment.

Official Title
-----------------
Satisfaction Survey for ALS Patients Comparing Rooms With and Without Assistive Technology

Conditions
-----------------
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Neurodegenerative Disease, Motor Neuron Disease

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: In-patients with probable or definite ALS, ages 18 - 90, staying on the neurology floor of Hahnemann Hospital Exclusion Criteria: In-patients who do not meet the criteria of the diagnosis of ALS.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| ALS<br>Subjects having either definite or probable ALS by El Escorial Criteria. | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Patient Satisfaction | Survey administered asks patients to rate their satisfaction with their hospital stay from Very Dissatisfied to Very Satisfied. Specific questions included satisfaction with hospital staff, quality of care, and comfort and accessibility of their room. | Period of Hospital Stay | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Neurodegenerative Disease, Motor Neuron Disease, Autonomic Nervous System, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Movement Disorders, Quality of Life
Health Status Evaluation for Cancer Survivors by Non-intrusive Sensing System

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
To improve quality of life of elderly cancer survivors Using physical activity and environmental sensing technology Monitoring physiological indicators of cancer recurrence Analyzing the patient's circadian rhythm, frailty and his/her vital sign. Vital sign includes blood pressure, weight and hrv. Collecting the patient information in real time Giving alarm information to the patient, if any special cases our system found. Giving circadian rhythm report to the patient. Giving healthy report to the patient, collected from his/her vital sign.

Official Title
-----------------
Health Status Evaluation for Cancer Survivors by Non-intrusive Sensing System

Conditions
-----------------
Cancer

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: The clinical pathology and diagnostic imaging to determine the cancer who completed acute treatment, and patients with more than a month recuperating. Over 65 years old. Proficient in Chinese or Taiwanese. Normal cognitive function Exclusion Criteria: No history of cancer Over 65 years old. Proficient in Chinese or Taiwanese. Normal cognitive function

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Quality of Life |  | Three weeks | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Cancer survivors, circadian rhythm, Elderly Patients, frailty
Brain Injury Biomarkers in the General Population

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to use an investigational assay to assess levels of putative biomarkers of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a general population. The data will be used in a correlative analysis with data collected under a separate study of severe TBI.

Conditions
-----------------
Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Blood draw at Days 0, 7, 14, and 21


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: At least 18 years of age and no more than 80 years of age Willing to undergo consent PI believes volunteer is appropriate candidate for study Exclusion Criteria: Participating in another clinical study that may affect the results of either study Non-English speaking Venipuncture not feasible Blood donation within 1 week of screening PI determines volunteer is not medically suitable for study participation

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 80 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Healthy Volunteers<br> | Other: Blood draw at Days 0, 7, 14, and 21<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Assessment of the putative biomarkers for TBI markers in general population using an investigational assay |  | up to 21 days | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Correlation of the putative biomarkers for TBI levels in general population to levels in patients with severe TBI |  | 0, 14, 7, and 21 days |
The Effect Of Fesoterodine On Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of Warfarin In Healthy Subjects

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This is an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study to evaluate the steady-state effect of fesoterodine (8 mg QD) on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single supratherapeutic dose of warfarin (25 mg) in healthy subjects.

Official Title
-----------------
An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study To Evaluate The Steady-State Effect Of Fesoterodine On The Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of A Single Supratherapeutic Dose Of Warfarin In Healthy Subjects.

Conditions
-----------------
Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: warfarin
* Drug: Warfarin plus Fesoterodine


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 55 years Exclusion Criteria: Not healthy subjects--subjects with acute or chronic medical or psychiatric conditions or laboratory abnormality

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 55 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Warfarin Alone<br>Reference treatment | Drug: warfarin<br>* Single Dose Warfarin 25 mg on Day 1<br>|
| Experimental: Warfarin Concomitantly With Fesoterodine<br>Test treatment | Drug: Warfarin plus Fesoterodine<br>* Fesoterodine 8 mg ER tablets QD for 9 Days and Single Dose Warfarin 25 mg on Day 3<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cmax and AUCinf for both S- and R-warfarin |  | 8 days per period | 
| AUC_INR and INRmax |  | 8 days per period | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| AUClast, Tmax and t½ for both S- and R-warfarin |  | 8 days per period | 
| AUC_PT and PTmax |  | 8 days per period | 
| Safety will be assessed by subjective symptoms/objective findings including physical examinations, clinical safety laboratory assessments, 12-lead ECGs, vital sign measurements and adverse event monitoring. |  | 8 days per period | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Overactive Bladder Urgency Frequency
Effect of Sustained-Release Cetylpyridinium Chloride Varnish on Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus in Orthodontic Patients

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of the study is to was to evaluate the anti bacterial efficacy of sustain-release Cetylpyridinium chloride varnish on orthodontic patients.

Official Title
-----------------
Phase 1: To Evaluate the Antibacterial Efficacy of Sustained Release Cetylpyridinium Chloride Varnish in Orthodontic Patients

Conditions
-----------------
Healthy

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Exclusion Criteria: Children under 12y old

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 12 Years
Maximum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Cetylpyridinium chlorid, Sustained release, orthodontic patients, streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus, Rate of bacterial load in saliva of orthodontic patients
Protective Brace to Prevent Hand and Arm Injuries

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
When people use hand-held power tools, their hands and arms vibrate along with the tool they are holding. People who frequently use hand-held power tools may develop injuries related to this vibration. This study will evaluate a protective brace designed to prevent vibration-related hand and arms injuries.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Workers who use hand-held power tools absorb significant vibration energy in their arms and hands and may develop musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) such as carpal tunnel syndrome and hand-arm vibration syndrome. Protective braces may be worn to decrease the incidence of occupational MSDs. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has identified key attributes for protective braces; these attributes include vibration damping, comfort, non-interference with worker dexterity, and maintenance of safe hand temperature. Most currently available braces do not adequately address these NIOSH requirements. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a brace with piezoelectric damping material. Participants in the study will be fitted with a brace on each hand. One brace will have piezoelectric damping material and the other will be a currently available, off-the-shelf commercial brace. Hand-held joysticks and handles mounted to a vibration shaker table will be used to simulate power tool use. Participants will undergo a series of tests designed to measure hand acceleration and vibration while grasping the study joysticks and handles. The tests will take approximately 30 minutes.

Official Title
-----------------
Shock Absorbing Brace for Study of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders

Conditions
-----------------
Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: piezoelectric wrist brace


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Normal hand anatomy and full range of motion Exclusion Criteria: History of significant hand or wrist arthritis Open wounds Prior hand or wrist surgery Neuropathies Skin hypersensitivity Contact dermatitis Reflex sympathetic dystrophy

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 21 Years
Maximum Age: 55 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Device: piezoelectric wrist brace|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Repetitive Strain Injuries, Vibration Damping, Protective Brace, Piezoelectric, SmartWear
Need for Subcutaneous Wound Drains in Ileostomy Reversal

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the insertion of subcutaneous wound drains has an influence on postoperative hospital stay in ileostomy reversal.

Official Title
-----------------
Need for Subcutaneous Wound Drains in Ileostomy Reversal

Conditions
-----------------
Presence of Ileostomy

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: insertion of subcutaneous wound drain
* Procedure: no insertion of subcutaneous wound drain


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: elective open reversal of an protective ileostomy Exclusion Criteria: age < 18 years missing suitability to comprehend patient information

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: subcutaneous wound drain<br>subcutaneous wound drain inserted | Procedure: insertion of subcutaneous wound drain<br>* after the abdominal fascia is closed and before skin closure, a subcutaneous wound drain is inserted<br>|
| Experimental: no subcutaneous wound drain<br>no subcutaneous wound drain inserted | Procedure: no insertion of subcutaneous wound drain<br>* closure of abdominal wall and skin without insertion of subcutaneous wound drain<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| length of hospital stay (days) |  | 3 months postoperatively | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| surgical site infections |  | 3 months postoperatively | 
| colonization of abdominal wall with bacteria |  | 3 months postoperativly | 
| hematomas/ seromas |  | 3 months postoperatively | 
| postoperative complications |  | 3 months postoperatively | 
| postoperative pain/ dysaesthesia |  | 3 months postoperatively | 
| cosmetic result |  | 3 months postoperatively | 
| postoperative costs |  | 3 months postoperatively | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
ileostomy reversal, subcutaneous drain, hospital stay, postoperative wound infection, patients with elective ileostomy reversal
Multi-detector Computer Tomography Protocol Project: Chest Imaging Technique and Case Presentation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Multi-detector computer tomography protocol project: Chest imaging technique and case presentation.

Official Title
-----------------
Multi-detector Computer Tomography Protocol Project: Chest Imaging Technique and Case Presentation

Conditions
-----------------
Aortic Dissection, Thrombosis in Left Atrium and Right Axillary Artery, Double IVC, May-Thurner Syndrome, Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Chest imaging technique and case presentation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with complete clinical images Exclusion Criteria: Patients with incomplete clinical images
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Other: Chest imaging technique and case presentation|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |