Evaluation of the Healthy Relationships Plus Program for Youth

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Adolescent risk behaviours, such as violence and substance use, are prevalent public health concerns in Canada. Further, these behaviours often co-occur, and are associated with poor mental health. However, the majority of prevention programs focus on preventing single issues and do not consider mental health, and also neglect the importance of relationships when promoting positive youth development. To address this gap, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Centre for Prevention Science designed the Fourth R Healthy Relationships Plus Program, a small group program focused on the promotion of positive mental health and the reduction of violence and substance use, via the development of improved communication, interpersonal and help-seeking skills. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Fourth R Healthy Relationships Plus program using both outcome (randomized controlled trial design with follow-up at pre-test, post-test, and 4, 8 and 12 months) and process evaluation tools. The primary study hypothesis is that participation in the Fourth R Healthy Relationships Plus program will be associated with positive growth in treatment participants' psychological well-being from pre-test to 12-month follow-up, as compared to control participants. In secondary analyses, the study will explore if treatment participants report less substance use, peer violence, bullying and dating violence at 12-month follow-up than control participants. Since certain person-level (e.g., sex, personality, executive functioning) and program-level (e.g., implementation quality) variables may moderate treatment-outcome relationships, these associations will also be explored. The final hypothesis is that treatment participants will report better attitudes, knowledge and assertive communication at post-test compared to control participants, and that these improvements will mediate the association between program participation and 12-month outcomes.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluation of the Healthy Relationships Plus Program for Youth

Conditions
-----------------
Mental Health Wellness 1

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Healthy Relationships Plus Program (HRPP)
* Behavioral: Control Condition (Classroom Activities)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Currently enrolled (as of March 2014) in grade 9 or 10 at schools serving as study sites Exclusion Criteria: Not available during the period July 7-17, 2014 (the main study period) Not interested in participating in the project, as assessed on study information form Identified by the Guidance Office at his/her school as posing a serious safety risk to him/herself or others

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 14 Years
Maximum Age: 17 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Healthy Relationships Education/Skills<br>The experimental intervention is the group-based, 15-session Healthy Relationships Plus Program (HRPP). In this study, the HRPP will be offered in a condensed 8-day format (July 8-11 and 14-17, 2014). On days 1 to 7, participants will attend the program for 2 hours, and on day 8, participants will attend the program for 1 hour. The program will be facilitated by high school teachers. Eight HRPP groups will run concurrently during the study period. | Behavioral: Healthy Relationships Plus Program (HRPP)<br>* The Healthy Relationships Plus Program (HRPP) is an out-of-school time program that is facilitated by a teacher or other youth leader. HRPP sessions use interactive teaching strategies to discuss healthy relationships, dating violence, personal values/boundaries, communication skills, emotional health and well-being, and helping friends.<br>|
| Other: Classroom Activities<br>The control condition is a group-based, 15-session program focusing on typical Classroom Activities. The primary activity is to create a school welcome packet for incoming Grade 9 students, with other activities including reading and physical exercise. The control condition will be offered on 8 consecutive weekdays (July 8-11 and 14-17, 2014). On days 1 to 7, participants will attend the control program for 2 hours, and on day 8, participants will attend the control program for 1 hour. The control group will be facilitated by bachelor's level research assistants and pre-service teachers. Eight control groups will run concurrently during the study period. | Behavioral: Control Condition (Classroom Activities)<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Growth from baseline to 12-month follow-up on a multi-variable latent psychological well-being construct | Scales included to indicate the latent psychological well-being construct are: hope purpose depression/anxiety emotion regulation coping behaviours flourishing mental health | Baseline, Month 4, Month 8, Month 12 | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Decrease in reported perpetration on the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) Physical Abuse and Threatening Behaviour sub-scales in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in reported perpetration on the Cyber Dating Abuse scale in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in reported physical fighting in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in past 30 day drinking frequency in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in past 30 day heavy episodic drinking (binge drinking) in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in past 30 day marijuana use in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in reported likelihood to try illicit drugs (e.g., marijuana; other illegal drugs; non-prescribed prescription drugs) during the next 12 months in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in reported perpetration on the Bullying Evaluation and Strategies Tool (grade 7-12 items) in treatment versus control participants at 12 month follow-up, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Month 12 | 
| Decrease in hostility on a 4-point hostility scale in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 
| Improvement in drug attitudes on the 4-point Drug Attitude Scale in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 
| Improvement in attitudes towards violence on the 4-point Acceptability of Violence scale in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 
| Greater use of program concepts in written responses to 3 open-ended knowledge questions in treatment versus control participants at 10 days. |  | Day 10 | 
| Improvement in interpersonal negotiation strategy scores with parents in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 
| Improvement in interpersonal negotiation strategy scores with peers in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 
| Improvement in interpersonal negotiation strategy scores with romantic partners in treatment versus control participants at 10 days, compared to baseline |  | Baseline, Day 10 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Mental health, Violence, Substance use, Adolescent, Prevention