Contribution of Computed Tomography and Cardiac-MRI in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Atrial fibrillation ablation (AF) is a standard interventional treatment for patients with symptomatic AF refractory to medical treatment. The known predictive factors for the success of the procedure remain insufficient to predict the probabilities of success and to appropriately select the patients who could benefit the most from this procedure. Left atrium imaging by MRI or CT may be able to identify AF substrate. However data are lacking about the practical impact of these techniques in routine practice to predict AF ablation outcome. The CT-AF study is a prospective, interventional, multicenter cohort study. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of a new automated measurement technique for intra-myocardial atrial fat measurement in cardiac CT and the measurement of global left atrial strain in MRI in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation. The main outcome will be the relationship between the relative volume of left atrial fat measured with CT and total left atrial strain in MRI and recurrence of AF at 1 year after the ablation procedure (blanking period of 3 months post ablation excluded).

Detailed Description
-----------------
Scientific background : Atrial fibrillation ablation (AF) is a standard interventional treatment for patients with symptomatic AF refractory to medical treatment. The known predictive factors for the success of the procedure remain insufficient to predict the probabilities of success and to appropriately select the patients who could benefit the most from this invasive procedure. Previous studies have shown that the quantification of atrial fibrosis in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a good marker of atrial remodeling and would reliably predict the chances of success of the ablation procedure. Nevertheless, the use of this technique is very limited in routine because of the complexity of quantitative analysis and spatial resolution limits. The association of fibrosing processes within epicardial fat has been established. The characterization of epicardial fat in CT could be a relevant substitute for the direct characterization of fibrosis. This examination was essential for the study of atrial anatomy before ablation of AF. In addition to the anatomical evaluation, the study of sub-epicardial fat by cardiac CT could therefore be an interesting approach for evaluating the AF substrate. Main objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of a new automated measurement technique for intra-myocardial atrial fat measurement in cardiac CT and the measurement of global left atrial strain in MRI in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the clinical features associated with CT-measured atrial epicardial fat in patients requiring first AF ablation To evaluate the clinical features associated with global and regional left atrial strain measured by MRI in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation To study global and regional relationships between intramyocardial fat in CT and left atrial strain in MRI To evaluate the impact of catheter ablation on the evolution of atrial subepicardial fat measured by CT To evaluate the prognostic value of atrial subepicardial fat measured by CT after AF ablation To evaluate the relation between subepicardial fat measured by CT and uni-and bipolar voltages mapped in sinus rhythm in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation To evaluate the relationship between CT subcuticardic fatness and the distribution of AF-mapped fragmented electrograms in patients who are first-ablated with FA To evaluate the relationship between segmental strain measured by MRI and uni and bipolar voltages mapped in sinus rhythm in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation To evaluate the relationship between segmental strain measured by MRI and distribution of fragmented electrograms mapped to FA in patients who are candidates for first AF ablation. To evaluate the interest of the cartographic fusion function-fat-function-electrophysiology 3D To evaluate the relationship between epicardial fat measured by CT and serum biomarkers (adipokines: MMP8 and Activin A, ANF) measured at baseline and at 3 months after ablation To evaluate the relationship between segmental strain measured by MRI and serum biomarkers (adipokines: MMP8 and Activin A, ANF) measured at baseline and at 3 months after ablation. Experimental scheme: This is a prospective, interventional, multicenter cohort study. Patients with a first radiofrequency or cryotherapy AF ablation are expected to receive a cardiac CT scan (performed for left atrial anatomy study) from which the volume of sub-epicardial fat will be measured. by a new automated measurement technique. The correlation of this measure with the success of ablation (defined as the absence of recurrence of atrial arrhythmia sustained> 30 seconds) will be blinded prospectively to 1 year of follow-up. In addition, the reliability of this measurement will be validated against reference measurements in CT and MRI. The evolution of epicardial fat volume after ablation will be evaluated by a control scan performed as part of the treatment (detection of FA post-ablation pulmonary stenosis). The methods of overall care, imaging examinations and decision criteria at the level of care are common to the 3 investigative centers. Visits: V0: selection visit between M-6 and J-1 before ablation (J0) Clinical examination, interrogation and antecedents; ECG 12D; Programming of the preoperative assessment: cardiac scanner after biological assessment with blood ionogram, urea and creatinine and cardiac ultrasound; Verification of inclusion and non inclusion criteria; Patient information and surrender of consent. Inclusion visit V1 between the V0 selection visit and the maximum at D-1 before the ablation (J0), after collection of the consent Cardiac MRI; Biomarker assay and biological collection. Recovery of Echocardiography, Standard Biological and Cardiac Scanner data prior to visit V2. Visit V2: Ablation of FA = J0 Physical examination ; ECG 12D; Standard biological assessment; Ablation data. Follow-up visits: V3 (M3 +/- 10d): Clinical examination, ECG 12D, holter ECG, cardiac scanner, standard biological assessment, biomarker assay and biological collection. V4 (M6 +/- 15d): clinical examination, ECG 12D, holter ECG. V5 (M12 +/- 1month) = End of study visit: Clinical examination, ECG 12D, holter ECG. Number of selected subjects : 130 patients Number of recruiting centers : 5 centers

Official Title
-----------------
Contribution of Left Atrial Epicardial Fat Quantification by Computed Tomography and Left Atrial Strain by MRI in Atrial-Fibrilation Ablation: The CTStrain-AF Study

Conditions
-----------------
Atrial Fibrillation

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Magnetic resonance imaging


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patient in whom radiofrequency AF ablation is scheduled within the next 6 months. age ≥18 years Patient affiliated to a social security scheme Patient informed and given written consent for participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Refusal to participate in the study Patient who has already benefited from an AF ablation procedure Patient for whom an AF ablation procedure by cryoablation system is planned Scanner or MRI pre-inclusion not exploitable Presence of an implantable cardiac prosthesis of pacemaker type or defibrillator Claustrophobia Iodinated / gadolinium contrast medium allergy Chronic renal failure with clearance <30ml / min Follow-up visits not possible Pregnancy in progress Patients unable to sign consent Minors and adults protected under legal protection (tutorship or guardianship) Period of exclusion from a research study

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Procedure: Magnetic resonance imaging|Cardiac magnetic resonnance imaging before catheter ablation.|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prognostic value of automated measurement of epicardial fat in CT and and total left atrial strain in MRI | Relationship between the relative volume of left atrial fat and total left atrial strain in MRI and recurrence of atrial rhythm disturbances (defined as sustained atrial rhythm disturbance> 30 seconds) at 1 year after the ablation procedure (blanking period of 3 months post ablation excluded) | At 1 year | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Comparaison of prognostic value of automated measurement of epicardial fat in CT and the references methods | Comparison of the prognostic value of automated measurement of epicardial fat in CT compared to two reference methods (manual measurement of the reference literature) in all patients . | At 1 year | 
| Comparaison of volume and distribution of left atrial fat and total strail strain with data from electrophysiological mapping | Global and regional comparison of the relative volume of left atrial fat assessed by CT and left atrial strain assessed by MRI with electroanatomical mapping (voltage and fragmented potential maps) time frame: at one year | At 1 year | 
| Longitudinal study of subepicardial fat volume assessed by CT after ablation | Comparison of subepicardial left atrial fat volume assessed by CT before and after ablation and prognosis value of the post-ablation subepicardial fat volume on ablation success rate at one year (blanking period of 3 months excluded) | At 1 year | 
| Correlation between the fat volume and the biomarkers. | The correlation between left atrial fat vollume assessed by CT or left atrial strain assessed by MRI with biomarkers (adipokines: MMP8 and Activin A, ANF) will be studied at baseline and 3 months post ablation. The prognosis value of biomarkers with the ablation success rate at one year (blanking period of 3 months post ablation) will be studied | At 1 year | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Computed tomography