The Distraction of Knee Joint to Alleviate osteoArthritic Pain (DiKAP) Trial

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This is a randomized controlled trial examining the short- and long-term effects of mechanical nonsurgical knee joint traction on knee pain, function, and quality of life.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Knee OA symptoms are known to be impacted by increased joint loading and reduced joint space width between the articulating bones. Objectives: Primary objective: Investigate the short- and long-term efficacy of adding nonsurgical knee joint distraction to standard multimodal physical therapy treatment on pain, joint function and quality of life in patients with knee OA compared with standard physical therapy treatment alone. Secondary objective: examine whether the efficacy of mechanical traction would differ based on the mode of application (continuous vs. intermittent traction). Design and Subjects: A prospective, active control, three-parallel-group, investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial. 198 subjects will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of three study groups at a 1:1:1 allocation ratio (66 participants per group): a) Standard care only, b) continuous mechanical traction plus standard care, and c) intermittent mechanical traction plus standard care. Intervention: Participants in the standard care only group will receive 16 treatment sessions (2sessions/week) over 8 weeks, followed by 4 booster sessions (1session/2months) during the one-year period of the trial. Mechanical traction groups will receive standard care in addition to 20-minute knee traction (continuous or intermittent) using an external weight applying knee traction force. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes are physical function and pain assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes include the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, quality of life, Timed Up and Go, 40m fast-paced walk, and 30s chair stand tests, patient's self-perceived efficacy of treatment and patient's global assessment. Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed using the intension-to-treat (ITT) analysis with multiple imputations. The per-protocol analysis will be carried out and reported if its findings are different from those of the primary ITT analysis. The primary analysis of the primary outcomes at two- and six-month follow-up time points will be carried out using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test with adjustment for a set of pre-specified baseline covariates. Secondary analysis using ANCOVA test for the primary outcomes at the 12-month time point, and secondary outcomes at all follow-up time points will also be carried out.

Official Title
-----------------
Efficacy of Adding Mechanical Nonsurgical Knee Traction to Standard Physical Therapy Rehabilitation of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Conditions
-----------------
Knee Osteoarthritis

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Standard Physcial Therapy
* Other: Intermittent Mechanical Traction
* Other: Continuous Mechanical Traction


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: ≥40 years of age; having knee pain; having at least three of the following additional symptoms: a-morning stiffness ≤ 30 minutes, b-crepitation, c-bone margin tenderness, d-bony enlargement or e-no palpable warmth; willing to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: rheumatoid arthritis; serious pathological conditions (inflammatory arthritis and malignancy); total or partial arthroplasty of the affected knee joint, or on waiting list for joint replacement surgery; recent surgical procedure of the lower extremities in the previous 6 months; uncontrolled hypertension and unstable cardiovascular problems that could subject the participant to increased risk with exercise and physical exertion; physical incapability to safely perform exercises, walking or stationary cycling, as in: debilitating visual defects, neurological problems, exaggerated low back pain, advanced osteoporosis, and inability to walk 10 meters without an assistive device; use of prescribed analgesics, corticosteroid or analgesic injection intervention for knee pain within the previous 30 days; lack of clear comprehension of study procedures or inability to comply with instructions; stated inability to attend or complete the proposed course of intervention and follow-up schedule.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 40 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Standard Physical Therapy<br>Control group for the study. Intervention in the form of warm-up and strengthening, stretching and neuromuscular control exercises. | Other: Standard Physcial Therapy<br>* Patients assigned to this group will receive a 40-min multimodal supervised physical therapy treatment comprised of warm-up (10-min cycling/walking), muscle strengthening and stretching, and neuromuscular control exercises. Manual mobilization techniques may be applied as necessary according to the findings of the physical examination. Treating physical therapists will prescribe exercises based on a predetermined list of exercises.<br>|
| Experimental: Intermittent Mechanical Traction<br>Standard care in addition to intermittent mechanical distraction of the knee joint. | Other: Intermittent Mechanical Traction<br>* In addition to the standard treatment, patients in this group will receive intermittent knee joint decompression for 20 minutes. Patients will be lying supine with the knee semiflexed to 30° and supported by a wedge under the knee. A customized leg cuff will be placed around the lower leg and two ropes will be extending horizontally from the cuff to the vertical traction weight using a pulley system to transfer the traction force to the tibiofemoral articulation. The magnitude of the traction force will be between 10-15% of the patient's body weight. The traction force will be applied for 10 application cycles; each cycle comprised of 2 minutes traction followed by 30 seconds relief. This will sum up to 20 minutes of actual joint traction duration. The traction force application and relief time will be controlled manually by the treating therapist. Knee joint traction procedures will be applied at the end of the physical therapy session.<br>|
| Experimental: Continuous Mechanical Traction<br>Standard care in addition to continuous mechanical distraction of the knee joint | Other: Continuous Mechanical Traction<br>* Patients assigned to this group will receive the same treatment protocol as those in the Intermittent Mechanical Traction group. However, the knee traction force will be applied continuously for 20 minutes without intermittent force relief periods.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in pain score using the Arabic version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | A 5-point Likert scale comprised of 42 questions across 5 subscales. Standardized answers are assigned a score from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in physical function score using the Arabic version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | A 5-point Likert scale comprised of 42 questions across 5 subscales. Standardized answers are assigned a score from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in knee pain using the Arabic version of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (ANPRS) | A horizontal 11-point scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain ever. | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in Patient's Global Assessment | A single question using a 7-point Likert scale (1 indicates much worse, and 7 indicates much better). | 2, 6, 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in Health-related Quality of Life score using the Arabic version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) scale | A 36-item scale with a score ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status). | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in the time taken to complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) | Time (seconds) taken to rise from a chair, walk 3m, turn, walk back to the chair, then sit down | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in the wakling speed for the 40m fast-paced walk test | The walking speed (m/s) will be recorded to walk quickly and safely over a 10m walkway for a total of 40m (4 x 10m). | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in number of repetitions during the 30s chair stand test | The maximum number of chair stand repetitions possible in a 30 second period is counted and recorded. | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| change in the Patient's Self-perceived Efficacy of treatment | A single question inquiring about the patient's perception regarding the effectiveness of physical therapy intervention to improve the OA symptoms. A 5-point Likert scale (1 indicates not effective, and 5 indicates greatly effective). | 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 
| Change in other subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS (Symptoms, Sport and Recreation Function, and knee-related Quality of Life). | A 5-point Likert scale comprised of 42 questions across 5 subscales. Standardized answers are assigned a score from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. | Baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months follow-up | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Knee, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Joint distraction