Improving Aging in Place in Subsidized Housing

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted version of the Function Focused Care intervention, delivered by telephone, for improving aging in place for older adults living in subsidized housing. The study will include participants with and without mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia and will examine whether the study outcomes differ by cognitive status. Findings from this study will provide new information about how to optimize function and physical activity among older adults with and without cognitive impairment living in subsidized housing.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Millions of older adults with low incomes live in federally-subsidized housing and are at disproportionate risk for nursing home admission. Effective approaches are needed to improve aging in place for this vulnerable population. The objective of this study is to pilot test the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a telephone-based intervention to improve aging in place for older adults living in subsidized housing. In the first phase of this study, the investigators used methods of implementation science to adapt an existing intervention, Function Focused Care for Assisted Living, to the unique setting of affordable housing. Function Focused Care is a philosophy of care in which assisted living staff members engage residents in functional and physical activity during all care interactions. Prior research supports the effectiveness of Function Focused Care for maintaining function and increasing physical activity among older adults in assisted living settings. In the first phase of this study, the investigators interviewed subsidized housing stakeholders - including residents, staff members, and caregivers - to identify barriers, facilitators, and needed adaptations to Function Focused Care for Assisted Living. The investigators used the findings from these interviews to adapt the intervention. In this 2-month pilot study, the investigators will use a wait-list control design with site randomization to assess the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of the adapted intervention. The investigators will recruit individuals with and without mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia and will examine whether the study outcomes differ by cognitive status. The findings from this study will provide new information about how to optimize function and physical activity among older adults with and without cognitive impairment living in subsidized housing.

Official Title
-----------------
Improving Aging in Place for Older Adults in Subsidized Housing

Conditions
-----------------
Physical Disability, Cognitive Impairment, Physical Activity

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing.


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria, Residents: Lives in an included subsidized housing setting 62 years of age or older Speaks English or Spanish well or very well Able to provide informed consent OR able to provide assent and has a proxy who provides informed consent on his/her behalf Has difficulty or needs help in at least 1 ADL and/or IADL OR has mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia based on their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score Not enrolled in hospice Inclusion Criteria, Study Partners: Speaks English or Spanish well or very well Able to provide informed consent Spends at least an hour per week with the resident Inclusion Criteria, Staff Members: Speaks English or Spanish well or very well Able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria, Residents: Younger than 62 years of age Does not speak English or Spanish Lacks decision making capacity and lacks a proxy to consent on his/her behalf Does not have functional impairment or cognitive impairment Has moderate to severe dementia based on his/her MoCA score Is enrolled in hospice Exclusion Criteria, Study Partners: Does not speak English or Spanish Unable to provide informed consent Does not spend at least an hour per week with the resident Exclusion Criteria, Staff Members: Does not speak English or Spanish Unable to provide informed consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 62 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Other
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: This is a pilot study testing the adapted Function Focused Care intervention. The study employs a wait-list control design and site randomization.
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Immediate Intervention<br>Upon enrollment, participants receive the adapted telephone-based intervention, the Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing, for two consecutive months. | Behavioral: Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing.<br>* Two-month program intended to increase physical activity and function, including the following 4 steps: Environmental and Policy Assessments: Nurse facilitator works with the affordable housing staff to identify and recommend feasible interventions to alter the environment, policy, and procedures to optimize resident function and physical activity. Education: Nurse educates residents and study partners in the principles of the Independent Living Program, using established materials and adult learning techniques. Establishing Resident Goals: The nurse completes Capability Assessment Forms and helps resident set goals to increase function and physical activity. The nurse helps to motivate and mentor residents and study partners to achieve and maintain their goals, using evidence-based approaches.<br>|
| Experimental: Wait-list Control<br>Two months after study enrollment, participants receive the adapted telephone-based intervention, the Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing, for two consecutive months. | Behavioral: Independent Living Program for Affordable Housing.<br>* Two-month program intended to increase physical activity and function, including the following 4 steps: Environmental and Policy Assessments: Nurse facilitator works with the affordable housing staff to identify and recommend feasible interventions to alter the environment, policy, and procedures to optimize resident function and physical activity. Education: Nurse educates residents and study partners in the principles of the Independent Living Program, using established materials and adult learning techniques. Establishing Resident Goals: The nurse completes Capability Assessment Forms and helps resident set goals to increase function and physical activity. The nurse helps to motivate and mentor residents and study partners to achieve and maintain their goals, using evidence-based approaches.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Precipitating Events Project (PEP) Functional Status Scale from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Self-reported ability to perform 7 ADLs, 3 higher-level mobility tasks, and 5 IADLs (Range, 0-30; higher scores indicate more functional impairment) | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Change in Short Physical Performance Battery score from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Objective measure of lower extremity functioning in older adults (Range, 0-12; higher scores indicate worse lower extremity functioning) The measure will be collected only if in-person contact is possible during the COVID-19 outbreak. | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Change in average step counts from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Measured using Fitbit | Measured continuously from 0-4 months | 
| Change in time spent in differing levels of activity from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Measured using Fitbit (minutes spent in each of 4 levels of activity: sedentary; lightly active; fairly active; very active) | 0-4 months | 
| Change in Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Self-reported physical activity (Range, 0-793; higher scores indicate greater physical activity) | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Feasibility of study recruitment, measured as percentage of eligible participants recruited | Assessed using participant responses to invitation to participate in the study (enrolled vs. refused) | 0-4 months | 
| Feasibility of study retention, measured as percentage of participants retained over study follow-up | Assessed as percentage of participants who remain enrolled in the study | 0-4 months | 
| Acceptability assessed using a survey question | Self-reported acceptability of the intervention (5-point Likert scale ranging from very unacceptable (1) to very acceptable (5); higher numbers indicate higher acceptability) | 0-4 months | 
| Acceptability assessed using qualitative interviews | Self-reported acceptability of the intervention assessed using open-ended questions (e.g., How did the program fit into your life?; no pre-specified range as responses are qualitative; more positive responses indicate higher acceptability) | 0-4 months | 
| Percentage fidelity to treatment protocol, measured using fidelity checklist | Fidelity checklist including each component, with fidelity measured as the percentage of total study protocol tasks completed (Range, 0-100%; higher percentage indicates higher fidelity) | 0-4 months | 
| Fidelity to motivational interviewing, measured using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Scale (MITI 4) | Assessed by psychologist (4 global scores, scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high)) | 0-4 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) scale from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Self-reported measure (Range, 11111-55555, converted to a single index utility score ranging from of 0-1; higher scores indicate better quality of life) | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Change in Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS Short Form) score from baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; change from 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites | Self-reported measure of depressive symptoms (Range, 0-15; score of 5-8 suggests mild depression, 9-11 moderate depression, and 12-15 severe depression) | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Percentage of participants with a hospitalization during the study period (baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites) | Self-reported hospitalization | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Number of hospitalizations during the study period (baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites) | Self-reported number of hospitalizations | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Percentage of participants with an emergency department visit during the study period (baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites) | Self-reported emergency department visit | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Number of emergency department visits during the study period (baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites) | Self-reported number of emergency department visits | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 
| Percentage of participants with a move to a higher level of care (baseline to 2 months for immediate intervention sites; 2 months to 4 months for waitlist control sites) | Self-reported or emergency contact-reported move to a higher level of care, defined as a move to assisted living, board and care, or nursing home | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months for wait-list control | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
aging in place, physical activity, cognitive impairment, dementia, affordable housing, subsidized housing, functional impairment, home health aides, activities of daily living