Cerebellum and Cortical Plasticity: the Case of Dystonia

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Purpose - Objective : Sensorimotor adaptation allows the modification of the motor command taking into account the errors detected during execution of prior movements. It involves a large cortico-subcortical network. Isolated lesions of this network do not systematically alter sensorimotor adaptation except for cerebellar lesions. The cerebellum is thus a key structure for sensorimotor adaptation. However, the link between cerebellar and the cortical plasticity underlying sensorimotor adaptation remain unknown. Alteration of sensorimotor adaptation is associated with dystonia but it is unclear whether it is a cause or consequence of dystonia. It has been hypothesized that the abnormal plasticity observed in dystonia could account for the associated alteration of sensorimotor adaptation. Classically, basal ganglia dysfunction is considered to be crucial for dystonia pathogenesis. However, recent studies suggest that the involvement of the cerebellum may also be important in this setting. In primary dystonia, imaging studies showed abnormal cerebellar activation during sensorimotor adaptation tasks and neurophysiological studies demonstrated a decrease of cerebellar output. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of the cerebellum in the cortical plasticity underlying sensorimotor adaptation both in healthy subjects (normal plasticity) and in dystonic patients (abnormal plasticity). - Methods: Paired associative stimulation PAS consists in repetitive pairing of a peripheral nerve and a cortical stimulation. This kind of stimulation has been designed to induce artificial plasticity that can be easily measured. This PAS induced sensorimotor plasticity is exacerbated and has lost its topographical specificity in dystonic patients.TMS using trains of TMS pulses (rTMS) can be applied on the cerebellum to modulate its output. We will test the effect of rTMS induced modulation (cTBS- inhibitory, iTBS-excitatory, sham) of the cerebellar output on PAS induced plasticity in patients with dystonia and healthy control. We will also assess the acute effect of the rTMS induced modulation of the cerebellar output on the dystonic symptoms and on the performance at a validated sensorimotor adaptation task. This will be done by double blind post-hoc scoring of the dystonia (BFM or TWSTRS) on standardized videorecording and measurement of the performance at the task after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). Finally, we will assess the variation of PAS effect on other parameters reflecting cortical excitability after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham).

Official Title
-----------------
Cerebellum and Cortical Plasticity: the Case of Dystonia

Conditions
-----------------
Dystonia

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Transcranial magnetic stimulation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion criteria All subjects Age >18 years and < 70 years Normal physical and neurological examination, except for dystonia (when present) No treatment with botulinum toxin during the last three months No treatment altering the cortical excitability Agreement to use a medically acceptable method of contraception throughout the study for female of childbearing potential Primary focal dystonia group Patients with cervical and/or upper limb dystonia No cause of secondary dystonia Secondary dystonia group • Cervical dystonia and/or upper limb dystonia History of perinatal anoxia Exclusion criteria MMS ≤ 24/30 Current neurological or psychiatric illness other than dystonia. Individual who is on medication which is known to lower seizure threshold (see lists above), or who has a pacemaker, an implanted medical pump, a metal plate, a metal plate or metal object in the skull or eye (for example after brain surgery) will be excluded Uncontrollable medical problems not related to dystonia such as; cardiopulmonary disease, severe rheumatoid arthritis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin, active cancer, or renal disease Previous history of seizure(s) or current active epilepsy Pregnancy, breast feeding women and women who are of childbearing age and not practicing adequate birth control. Patients legally protected Patients who are not enrolled at social security

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Primary cervical dystonia Patients<br> | Other: Transcranial magnetic stimulation<br>* Transcranial magnetic stimulation (PAS and rTMS)<br>|
| Experimental: Primary upperlimb Dystonia Patients<br> | Other: Transcranial magnetic stimulation<br>* Transcranial magnetic stimulation (PAS and rTMS)<br>|
| Experimental: Secondary Cervical or Upperlimb Dystonia due to cerebral palsy<br> | Other: Transcranial magnetic stimulation<br>* Transcranial magnetic stimulation (PAS and rTMS)<br>|
| Other: Healthy volunteers<br> | Other: Transcranial magnetic stimulation<br>* Transcranial magnetic stimulation (PAS and rTMS)<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Comparison of MEP0/MEP10 and MEP0/MEP30 values obtained after sham, cRTBS or iTBS of the cerebellum. | The effect of rTMS induced modulation of the cerebellar output on the PAS induced plasticity will be assessed by measurement of the size variation of a 1mV test motor evoked potential (which reflect cortical excitability) before (MEP0) and 10 and 30 minutes (MEP10 and MEP30) after PAS. The primary outcome measure will be the comparison of MEP0/MEP10 and MEP0/MEP30 values obtained after sham, cRTBS or iTBS of the cerebellum. | 6 weeks | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Variation of the appropriate dystonic clinical score (depending on the type of dystonia) after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | The effect of rTMS induced modulation of the cerebellar output on dystonic symptoms will be assessed by the variation of the appropriate dystonic clinical score (depending on the type of dystonia) after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | 6 weeks | 
| Measurement of number of errors, mean time to reach the target after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | The effect of rTMS induced modulation of the cerebellar output on the performance at the sensorimotor adaptation task will be assessed by measurement of number of errors, mean time to reach the target after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | 6 weeks | 
| Measurement of the variation of the motor threshold, intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | The effect of rTMS induced modulation of the cerebellar output on other parameter reflecting cortical excitability will be assessed by measurement of the variation of the motor threshold, intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation after each rTMS session (cTBS, iTBS, sham). | 6 weeks | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Dystonia, Cerebellum, Cortical plasticity, Sensorimotor adaptation, Cerebral Palsy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and