Commitment and Motivation in a Brief DBT Intervention for Self Harm

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Research suggests that individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) experience low motivation for change (Skodal, Buckley, & Charles, 1983). Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT; Linehan, 1993) includes commitment strategies that are designed to improve motivation. No studies have examined the effectiveness of these strategies. The proposed study will evaluate the efficacy of a brief DBT intervention consisting of commitment strategies plus skills training for people who self-harm. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a single orientation session of (1) commitment strategies plus psychoeducation or (2) psychoeducation. Immediately following their orientation session, all participants will be enrolled in a 90 minute group skills training session. Primary outcomes include autonomous motivation and frequency of self harm behaviours. Assessments will be conducted at six time points: baseline, after the initial orientation session, after the skills training group session, and at one week, one month, and three month follow-up

Detailed Description
-----------------
Client motivation is related to therapeutic change (Ryan, Lynch, Vansteenkiste, & Deci) and low motivation is a pervasive issue for clients with BPD (e.g., Skodal et al., 1983). DBT (Linehan, 1993) is an effective treatment for BPD and was developed in part to address client motivation. Within DBT there are commitment strategies that are used to help clients establish clear goals and increase motivation to work on them. These strategies were designed to help people commit to eliminating self-harm as well as other behaviours. People are more motivated to work effectively towards goals for which they are autonomously motivated (Deci & Ryan, 2000). Despite their importance in DBT, commitment strategies have never been studied. This study will examine whether commitment strategies are associated with an increase in autonomous motivation and a decrease in self harm behaviour. This research will address two primary questions: 1) Are commitment strategies associated with an increase in autonomous motivation to decrease self-harm behaviour?; and 2) Does autonomous motivation mediate a relationship between commitment strategies and change in self-harm behaviour? The investigators will also address a secondary question related to predictors of autonomous motivation. Our hypotheses are as follows: 1) The group receiving psychoeducation enhanced with commitment strategies will have higher levels of autonomous motivation compared to the psychoeducation control group; and 2) autonomous motivation will mediate the relationship between commitment strategies and decreases in self harm behaviour. Additionally, autonomy support, low therapist judgment, and goal concordance between client and therapist will independently contribute to predicting client autonomous motivation. Research in this area is needed in light of the challenges presented by the low motivation that often characterizes individuals with borderline traits who engage in self-harm behaviour. No studies to date have examined DBT's commitment strategies, thus, the effect of these treatment strategies is unknown and needs to be established. Additionally, identifying specific variables that are associated with motivation to eliminate self-harm will help inform the refinement treatment strategies. Finally, few studies have examined the role of autonomous motivation and treatment outcome.

Official Title
-----------------
Commitment and Motivation in a Brief DBT Intervention for Self Harm

Conditions
-----------------
Psychological Orientation, Acceptance Processes

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: DBT Skills Training


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Has a valid health card issued by a Canadian province or Canadian student organization (ie: UHIP) Has had at least 3 self-harm episodes (either suicidal or non-suicidal) in the past 5 years, including at least 1 in the past eight weeks Is literate in English Absence of 4 or more formal weeks of DBT in the past year (individual or group therapy components) Indicates absence of knowledge of the DBT Skills Is able to attend all sessions on scheduled study day Exclusion Criteria: 1) Evidence of organic brain syndrome or mental retardation

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 80 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Commitment<br>A 1-hour orientation session consisting of DBT commitment strategies plus psychoeducation. Therapists will also use commitment strategies to discuss goals related to self-harm. The psychoeducation will consist of information about DBT's biosocial theory and about why people self-harm. All participants will complete a DBT skills training group after their orientation. | Behavioral: DBT Skills Training<br>* Based on Linehan's (1993) manualized DBT approach, the brief DBT skills training group covers will cover five skills: wise mind, TIP skills, distraction, mindfulness of the current emotion, and opposite to emotion action.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Psychoeducation<br>A 1-hour orientation session consisting of psychoeducation only. The psychoeducation will consist of information about DBT's biosocial theory and about why people self-harm. All participants will complete a DBT skills training group after their orientation. | Behavioral: DBT Skills Training<br>* Based on Linehan's (1993) manualized DBT approach, the brief DBT skills training group covers will cover five skills: wise mind, TIP skills, distraction, mindfulness of the current emotion, and opposite to emotion action.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Autonomous and Controlled Motivation | Autonomous and controlled motivation will be assessed using the Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire (Zuroff et al., 2005). | From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Frequency and severity of self-harm behaviour | The frequency and severity of self-harm behaviour will be assessed using the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory, a 17-item self-report questionnaire. | From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Commitment strategies, Motivation, DBT skills, Self-harm, Brief intervention