Mandibular Furcation II Regeneration

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Teeth with furcation grade II defects will be treated with open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate combined with either enamel matrix proteins or a collagen membrane.

Official Title
-----------------
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Collagen Membrane or Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and Enamel Matrix Proteins, in the Regenerative Treatment of Furcation Grade II Defects

Conditions
-----------------
Furcation Defects, Periodontal Diseases

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane)
* Drug: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Subject must be ≥ 20 years Subject must have periodontal disease as determined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria Subjects must be undergoing periodontal treatment or follow-up and present 1 or more pair of bilateral mandibular molars affected by furcation involvement grade II with PPD >4 mm, and the furcation fornix must be below a tangential line from the distal to mesial interproximal crestal bone level Competent to give consent Exclusion Criteria: The following must not be present at the time of enrolment; Previous radiotherapy to the jaws, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment Present or past use of bisphosphonate treatment Pregnant or nursing subjects Patients classified as > class 2 according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification Previous surgical therapy of included furcation defects Inability to comprehend and respond to the quality of life questionnaire Dental restorations or prosthesis involving the furcation area Root fractures or suspected infractions Caries lesions in the furcation area No systemic antibiotic treatment within 3 months prior to intervention

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 20 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Regenerative therapy w/BCP and collagen membrane<br>In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and collagen membrane. | Device: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane)<br>* Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + collagen membrane.<br>Drug: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)<br>* Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + enamel matrix proteins.<br>|
| Active Comparator: Regenerative therapy w/BCP and enamel matrix proteins<br>In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and enamel matrix proteins. | Device: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane)<br>* Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + collagen membrane.<br>Drug: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)<br>* Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + enamel matrix proteins.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change of furcation grade level | Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe | 12 months after treatment | 
| Change of furcation grade level | Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe | 24 months after treatment | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) | To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome. Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1). | Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment | 
| Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) | To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome. Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1). | Preoperatively compared to 12 months after treatment | 
| Changes in defect morphology assessed by CBCT | Cone beam computed tomography will be acquired at baseline, 2 weeks postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. This outcome measures quantitative morphologic changes in the furcation defects at 24 months | 24 months after treatment | 
| Changes in CAL | Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm | 12 months after treatment | 
| Changes in CAL | Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm | 24 months after treatment | 
| Changes in PPD | Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm | 12 months after treatment | 
| Changes in PPD | Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm | 24 months after treatment | 
| Radiographic changes | Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs | 12 months after treatment | 
| Radiographic changes | Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs | 24 months after treatment | 
| Pain following surgery | Pain sensation for one week posteoperatively will be recorded on a visual analog scale scale from 0-10. 0 is equivalent to no pain, whereas 10 is the highest pain imagineable. | Daily for 1 week postoperatively | 
| Caries assessment | Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N) | 12 months | 
| Caries assessment | Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N) | 24 months |