Patient Performance on Virtual Reality Visual Field Devices as Compared to Standard of Care

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this research is to study the effectiveness and patient experience when measuring visual fields using virtual reality goggles.

Official Title
-----------------
Patient Performance on Virtual Reality Visual Field Devices as Compared to Standard of Care

Conditions
-----------------
Glaucoma

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field
* Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion: Any individual who is physically able to take a virtual reality visual field test Patients who either have glaucoma, are glaucoma suspects, or have a strong family history of glaucoma, or have other visual field defects, and normal individual Age: Individuals who are old enough to comprehend the instructions and procedures (1-90) Exclusion: Adults unable to consent, prisoners Participants who are too tired to take a visual field test Participants who refuse to consent Individuals who are functionally unable to use VRVF

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 1 Year
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Adults with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma<br>Adults with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma, who have previously had standard automated perimetry (SAP) and will receive virtual reality visual field (VRVF) as part of the standard of care | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>|
| Visual Field Naive Adults<br>Visual Field Naive Adults will receive SAP and VRVF | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry<br>* Standard of care perimeter<br>|
| Children with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma<br>Children with Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma, who have previously had SAP and will receive VRVF as part of the standard of care | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>|
| Visual Field Naive Children<br>Visual Field Naive Children will receive SAP and VRVF | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry<br>* Standard of care perimeter<br>|
| Remote Care Arm<br>Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma participants, who have previously had SAP and will receive VRVF at their home | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>|
| Ptosis Arm<br>Patients diagnosed with Ptosis, brow ptosis, or dermatochalasis, will receive a specialized version of VRVF and SAP, specifically to detect ptosis | Device: Virtual Reality Visual Field<br>* A head-mounted perimeter with a wireless remote connected to a laptop that monitors responses<br>Diagnostic Test: Standard Automated Perimetry<br>* Standard of care perimeter<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity of VRVF compared to SAP | Sensitivity of VRVF will be determined by comparing Hodapp Anderson Parrish (HAP) Scores, which assess the severity of visual field defects, to those of SAP | Day 1 | 
| Specificity of VRVF compared to SAP | Specificity of VRVF will be determined by comparing Hodapp Anderson Parrish (HAP) Scores, which assess the severity of visual field defects, to those of SAP | Day 1 | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Variability of Mean Deviation | Variability of the mean deviation scores obtained from VRVF and SAP | Day 1 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Visual Field, Virtual Reality