Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Interventional Study in Single Blind

Conditions
-----------------
Pressure Sore

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Numeric prevention
* Other: Paper prevention


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patient in complete hospitalization in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Patient affiliated to a social security system Patient presenting a low to high risk of pressure ulcer inferior or equal to or equal to 16 on the Norton scale Patient having signed his consent Exclusion Criteria: Difficulty understanding and is unable to give free and informed consent Pregnant women Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative administrative decision Major under legal protection by a judicial or administrative decision. Person in an emergency situation unable to give their informed consent

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Other: Paper Information<br>Patient will have classic paper information for prevention of pressure sores | Other: Paper prevention<br>* Information for prevention of pressure sores in classic way with paper<br>|
| Experimental: Numeric information from MEDIASCREEN<br>Patient will have information for prevention of pressure sores throught the digital tool MEDIASCREEN | Other: Numeric prevention<br>* Numeric information for prevention of pressure sores thgrough digital tool MEDIASCREEN<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials | The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome. | Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool | Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : Not at all satisfied and 100 : Completely satisfied. Higher scores better outcome. | At 1 month | 
| Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem. | Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem. | At the beginning and at 1 month | 
| Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy. | Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness. | At the beginning and at 1 month | 
| Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools | Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : No knowledge and 100 : Perfectly mastered subject. Higher scores better outcome. | At 1 month | 
| Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization | Count of the apparition number of pressure sores. | At the beginning and at 1 month | 
| Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients | Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points. Higher scores better outcome. | At 1 month | 
| Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN. | Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3. | At 1 month | 
| Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN. | Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion. | At 1 month | 
| Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure. | The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement. | At the beggining and at 1 month |