Peripheral Perfusion Versus Lactate Targeted Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Persistent hyperlactatemia has been traditionally considered as representing tissue hypoxia, and lactate normalization is recommended as a resuscitation target by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). However, other sources contribute to hyperlactatemia such as sustained adrenergic activity and impaired lactate clearance. Only hypoperfusion-related hyperlactatemia might be reversed by optimizing systemic blood flow. Fluid resuscitation (FR) is used to improve cardiac output (CO) in septic shock to correct hypoperfusion. Nevertheless, if persistent hyperlactatemia is not hypoxia-related, excessive FR could lead to flow overload. In addition, kinetics of recovery of lactate is relatively slow, and thus it might be a suboptimal target for FR. Peripheral perfusion appears as a promising alternative target. Abnormal capillary refill time (CRT) is frequently used as trigger for FR in septic shock. Studies demonstrated the strong prognostic value of persistent abnormal peripheral perfusion, and some recent data suggest that targeting FR on CRT normalization could be associated with less fluid loading and organ dysfunctions. The excellent prognosis associated with CRT recovery, the rapid-response time to fluid loading, its simplicity, and its availability in resource-limited settings, constitute a strong background to promote studies evaluating its usefulness to guide FR . The study hypothesis is that a CRT-targeted FR is associated with less positive fluid balances, organ dysfunctions, and at least similar improvement of tissue hypoperfusion or hypoxia, when compared to a lactate-targeted FR. To test this hypothesis, the investigators designed a clinical physiological, randomized controlled trial in septic shock patients. Recruited patients will be randomized to FR aimed at normalizing CRT or normalizing or decreasing lactate >20% every 2 h during the study period. Fluid challenges (500 ml in 30 min intervals) will be repeated until perfusion target is achieved, or dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness become negative, or a safety limit is reached. The design of our study is aimed at: a) determining if CRT targeted resuscitation is associated with less fluid resuscitation and fluid balances; b) determining if this strategy is associated with less organ dysfunctions; and c) if it results in similar improvement in markers of tissue hypoperfusion or hypoxia such as hepato-splanchnic blood flow or microcirculatory perfusion.

Detailed Description
-----------------
GENERAL OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that a CRT-targeted FR is associated with less positive fluid balances, organ dysfunctions, and similar improvement of markers of tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia, when compared to a lactate- targeted FR. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES To determine if normalization of CRT is associated with less fluid resuscitation and positive 24-h fluid balances as compared to lactate-targeted resuscitation. To determine if normalization of CRT is associated with less organ dysfunctions as compared to lactate-targeted resuscitation. To determine if CRT-targeted resuscitation compared to lactate-targeted resuscitation leads to similar improvement in markers of tissue hypoperfusion or hypoxia at the end of fluid resuscitation To determine if normality of all the selected hypoperfusion variables (central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), central venous to arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference (P(cv-a)CO2), and CRT) at different time-points in septic shock patients can predict the absence of tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia. For this Research Project, several variables of tissue hypoperfusion that can only be assessed by special perfusion-monitoring techniques were included. Sublingual microcirculatory assessment: Sublingual microcirculatory alterations have been well described in septic shock patients. Functional capillary density and microvascular blood flow are decreased, while heterogeneity is markedly enhanced. These alterations have been shown to be prognostic, with a rapid improvement in survivors but a progressive decline in nonsurvivors. A microcirculatory flow index (MFI) ≤ 2.5 and a proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) < 80% will be considered as categorical of microcirculatory hypoperfusion Liver blood flow: Plasma disappearance rate (PDR) of indocyanine green (ICG), with a non-invasive transcutaneous assessment of ICG clearance. Normal range is 18% to 25% per minute with a value < 15%/min categorically abnormal. Muscle tissue O2 saturation: Muscle tissue O2 saturation (StO2). A decrease in this variable to <70% suggests profound tissue hypoperfusion. Assessment of tissue hypoxia: There are two clinically calculable variables that have been proposed as closely representing tissue hypoxia: the venous- arterial CO2 (Cv- aCO2) to arterial-venous O2 content (Da-vO2) difference ratio (Cv- aCO2/Da-vO2) and the lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratio . Both ratios are an expression of anaerobic metabolism at the cellular level and thus can be linked to hypoxia. For this research project, these variables were considered to ascertain the presence and resolution of tissue hypoxia. Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio: This ratio might be useful as a surrogate of the respiratory quotient. A ratio ≥ 1.4 could identify anaerobic CO2 generation. A high Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio in the setting of hyperlactatemia may favor anaerobic metabolism as the possible source of lactate, while a normal Cv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio suggesting that lactate accumulation is due to non-hypoperfusion- related causes. L/P ratio: In anaerobic conditions, pyruvate is transformed to lactate and thus the L/P ratio increases to ≥ 18. The L/P ratio is considered to be one of the most reliable indexes of hypoxia in critically ill patients. METHODOLOGY A randomized controlled study of parallel groups was designed: Group A with a CRT-targeted fluid resuscitation strategy and group B with a lactate-targeted one. This prospective study will be performed at the Hospital of the Pontifical Catholic University and at the Public Hospital of the South of Santiago, Chile. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of both centers. A signed informed consent will be asked to the next of kin of all eligible patients, and confirmed by the patients when feasible. The study intervention period will be of 6 hours I. Randomization A randomization sequence with an allocation of 1:1 will be generated by a computer program. Study-group assignment will be performed by means of randomized permuted blocks of eight. Allocation concealment will be maintained by means of central randomization. Fluid challenges (500 ml of Ringer's lactate administered in 30 min intervals) are repeated until the perfusion target is normalized, or fluid responsiveness becomes negative, or a safety limit of an increase in central venous pressure (CVP) ≥ 5 mmHg after a fluid bolus is reached. The perfusion target in group A is a normal CRT ≤3 sec. The perfusion target in group B is an arterial lactate ≤ 2 mmol/l or a decrease >20% every 2h. CRT will be assessed every 30 minutes and lactate every 2 hours during the 6h study intervention period, after which the treatment is liberalized for attending physicians. If fluid resuscitation is stopped because the perfusion target is normalized, the time is registered, and the patient subjected to the specific research-related assessment protocol and followed until hospital discharge. II. General management algorithm Besides sepsis source aggressive management, all patients will be treated according to our local algorithm aimed at macrohemodynamic stabilization and improvement of hypoperfusion. The algorithm has been described elsewhere. Co-interventions will be registered and considered in statistical analysis. III. Specific research-related assessments For the purposes of this research protocol, several variables will be periodically measured or calculated as follows: at baseline, at 2h, at 6h and at 24h. Macrohemodynamic variables such as mean arterial pressure,M, heart rate, norepinephrine dose, CVP, dynamic predictors. Continuous cardiac output (CO) monitoring: this will be performed with non-invasive pulse-contour CO assessment acquired with this project (PiCCO device). Metabolic-perfusion variables such as arterial lactate, ScvO2, and P(cva)CO2. Peripheral perfusion assessment: CRT and mottling score Sublingual microcirculation: It will be assessed with the side dark field (SDF) device. At each assessment, at least five 10-20 sec video images will be recorded. The analysis will be performed by eye following recent recommendations . From image analysis the following variables will be calculated (i) proportion of perfused vessels; (ii) microcirculatory flow index (MFI); All these indexes will be calculated separately for small (<20 microm diameter) and large vessels (> 20 microm diameter) . Liver blood flow: An ICG finger clip well be fixed in every patient and then connected to a liver function monitor (LiMON; Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). A dose of 0.25 mg/kg of ICG (LiMon Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) will be injected through a central venous catheter. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): StO2 will be measured by a tissue spectrometer (InSpectra Model 325; Hutchinson Tc, Mn, USA). A NIRS probe will be placed on the skin of the thenar eminence Ccv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio: This ratio will be calculated after taking arterial and central venous blood gases with the Douglas formula. L/P ratio: This ratio will be assessed at 0, 6 and 24h during the study period, at baseline and when fluid resuscitation is stopped. Arterial blood samples for pyruvate will be taken and processed in our laboratory before 3h according to the method described by De Backer et al , including immediate deproteinization of the sample and analysis by enzymatic fluorometric-assay (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) at baseline, 24, 48 and at 72h . Finally, all patients will be followed until hospital discharge, and all data including demographic aspects, sepsis sources and management, inflammatory biomarkers, and severity scores and major outcomes will be registered. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Sample size calculation: the simple size calculation was based in some small clinical studies. In a recent study, a resuscitation strategy guided by peripheral perfusion offered important benefits in terms of fluid administration at 6 hours (4227 ± 1081 ml vs 6069 ± 1715 ml) and organ dysfunction, when compared with standard fluid therapy. In consequence, a 1600 ml difference in the mean 24-h total fluid administration between the experimental CRT group and the conventional lactate group was considered to be the critical threshold for hypothesis testing. If there is truly no difference between the standard and experimental treatment, then 46 patients are required (23 patients per arm) to be 90% sure that the lower limit of a two-sided confidence interval will be above the limit of -1600 mL at an alpha level of 0.05. Statistical analysis Intention to treat analysis will be performed in order to minimize bias. Analyses will be performed as follows: Specific Objective #1: between study groups, the amount of fluids administered at the end of fluid resuscitation, and at 6, 24, 48 and 72h will be compared exclusively at each time-point with t-test, and comprehensively using ANOVA. Total 24-h fluid balance will be compared using t-test. Specific Objective #2, the status of peripheral perfusion normalization will be assessed in a categorical way (normal/abnormal) with chi-square at specific time-points (at the end of fluid resuscitation, 6, and 24h), and with means of SOFA score at each time-point up to 72h using t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test if appropriate. A total comparison using ANOVA will be also performed. In the same line, the relative change of SOFA among time-points (with baseline value as the reference) and between study groups will be assessed with analysis of proportions, using the binomial distribution. Specific Objective #3: comparison of improvement on markers of tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia between study groups will be mainly assessed in a categorical way using chi-square at different time-points, since those markers are qualitatively attributed a dichotomic normal/abnormal status. For some of them (ICG, StO2) as continuous variables, t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used at specific time points (at the end of fluid resuscitation, 6, 24h), and ANOVA for a global analysis. Specific Objective #4: For this objective, pooled data from all the studied patients will be used. Pearson correlations between selected hypoperfusion variables (ScvO2, P(cv-a)CO2, and CRT) with markers of tissue hypoperfusion/hypoxia will be explored at different time-points. All statistical calculations will be performed using Stata Statistical Software, Release 14 (College Station, TX). A probability value (p-value) of less than 0.05 will be considered

Official Title
-----------------
Peripheral Perfusion Versus Lactate Targeted Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: ANDROMEDA-SHOCK PHYSIOLOGY STUDY

Conditions
-----------------
Septic Shock, Hyperlactatemia, Peripheral Perfusion

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: CRT guided resuscitation
* Other: Lactate guided resuscitation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Septic shock diagnosed at ICU admission according to the Sepsis-3 Consensus Conference [35], basically septic patients with hypotension requiring norepinephrine (NE) to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg, and serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/l after initial fluid resuscitation. Less than 24 h after fulfilling criteria for septic shock Positive fluid responsiveness assessment Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnancy Anticipated surgery or dialytic procedure during the first 6h after septic shock diagnosis Do-not-resuscitate status Child B or C liver cirrhosis Active bleeding Severe concomitant acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: CRT guided resuscitation<br>Fluid resuscitation will be aimed at normalizing capillary refill time (CRT) during the intervention period. Fluid challenges will be administered at a rate of 500 ml of crystalloids over 30 minutes, with reassessment of CRT until achieving normal values, or the patient becomes fluid unresponsive, or a safety issue develops. | Other: CRT guided resuscitation<br>* Sequential approach with fluids (guided by dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness), according to capillary refill time (CRT)<br>|
| Active Comparator: Lactate guided resuscitation<br>Fluid resuscitation will be aimed at normalizing or decreasing lactate levels by more than 20% every 2 hours during the intervention during the intervention period. Fluid challenges will be administered at a rate of 500 ml of crystalloids over 30 minutes, with reassessment of lactate every 2 hours until reaching target, or the patient becomes fluid unresponsive, or a safety issue develops. | Other: Lactate guided resuscitation<br>* Sequential approach with fluids (guided by dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness), according to lactate levels<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Amount of resuscitation fluids | The total amount of fluids administered as fluid challenges from baseline to 6 hours after starting protocol | at six hours | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Total fluid balance | Balance of fluids in the first 24h (inputs-outputs) | at 24 hours | 
| Multiple organ dysfunction | Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores assessed at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours. The scale range is from 0 points to 24 points, where 0 points represent normality and no organ dysfunction, and 24 points severe organ dysfunction for the six organs evaluated. More than 10 points is considered severe organ dysfunction. The six organs evaluated in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score are: lungs, cardiovascular system, coagulation, liver, kidneys, and central nervous system. All six organs are evaluated from 0 (normal function) to 4 (severe dysfunction) and these sub-scores are summed to get the total SOFA score. | At 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours | 
| Sublingual microcirculation | Evaluation of sublingual microcirculation by SDF: Videos will be taken at the sublingual mucosa with the SDF device. Two parameters will be calculated systematically by off-line video analysis according to consensus recommendations: MFI (normal value 3.0, with <2.5 considered as abnormal (range 0-3); and PPV where 100% is normal, with <80% representing clear abnormalities (range 0-100%) | at baseline, 6 hours and 24 hours | 
| Hepato-splanchnic blood flow | Evaluation of hepato-splanchnic blood flow by ICG clearance: calculation of plasma dissapearance of ICG with normal values >18% in 15 minutes | At baseline, 6 hours and 24 hours | 
| Muscle tissue oxygenation | Evaluation of muscle tissue oxygen saturation by NIRS (normal value >75%) | At baseline, 6 hours and 24 hours | 
| Ccv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio | Assessed by the Ccv-aCO2/Da-vO2 ratio as a marker of tissue hypoxia: normal value <1 | At baseline, 6 hours and 24 hours | 
| Lactate/Pyruvate ratio | Assessed by the L/P ratio as another marker of tissue hypoxia. Normal value 10 | At baseline, 6 hours and 24 hours | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Septic Shock, Lactate, Capillary refill time, Fluid Responsiveness, Mortality