Performance of a Single-use Gastroscope (aScope Gastro) for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Several infectious outbreaks have been described in the literature as a result of contaminated endoscopes. These endoscopes cannot be sterilized and require an extensive cleaning process in which breaches of cleaning protocols, endoscope damage or the formation of biofilm can prevent proper disinfection. The risk of endoscopy associated infection (EAI) and colonization due to contaminated endoscopes is still considered to be low. However, it is likely that there is severe underreporting of outbreaks due to a lack of recognition or assuming an infection to be endogenous. Due to the sheer volume of upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy worldwide, even with a low risk of EAI, the number of affected patients is significant. In response, several manufacturers have turned to the production of single-use endoscopes that eliminate the risk of exogenous infections. There are single use duodenoscopes on the market that almost seem to match the performance of reusable duodenoscopes. A new single use sterile gastroscope, Ambu aScope gastro, has been developed whose performance has not been previously described in patients. This multicenter single arm consecutive case series study will test the performance of these single use gastroscopes in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an important tool in the diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal-disorders. It has broad range of indications including dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal strictures or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. It is a common procedure and is performed around 6.1 million times annually in the United States. However, performing endoscopy is not without risk and complications of EGD include perforation, bleeding, aspiration, and infection. Endoscopy associated infection (EAI) can be endogenous, due to translocation of the patient's own microbial gut flora into the bloodstream, or exogenous as a result of contaminated equipment. The latter receives increased attention as several outbreaks have been reported past decades. Endoscopes cannot be sterilized and require an extensive cleaning process in which breaches of cleaning protocols, endoscope damage or the formation of biofilm can prevent proper disinfection. Many of the published outbreaks involved contaminated duodenoscopes. However, multiple outbreaks due to a contaminated gastroscopes have also been described. The prevalence of contaminated ready-to-use gastroscopes has rarely been studied. One study reported the contamination of ready-to-use gastroscopes to be 64% post-high-level disinfection (HLD), which went down to 9% post-storage. It is probable that EAI's are underreported due to a lack of recognition of EAI's caused by sensitive microorganisms, sparse microbiological surveillance post-endoscopy or the possibly long duration between the endoscopy and the development of the infection. However, even if the risk of EAI is low, due to the large numbers of endoscopies performed worldwide the number of affected patients is significant. Single use endoscopes would completely eliminate the risk of exogenous EAI's. Already multiple single-use duodenoscopes have been brought to the market whose performance seems be comparable to reusable duodenoscopes. To address the risk of contaminated gastroscopes, Ambu is a company who produced a single-use gastroscope, the Ambu® aScope™ gastro. It is a lightweight scope equipped with two LED lights for optimal illumination and a high-resolution digital camera. The aScope gastro has recently been CE-approved, but no studies about its performance in patients have been published

Official Title
-----------------
Performance of a Single-use Gastroscope (aScope Gastro) for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Conditions
-----------------
Gastroscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, Equipment Design, Equipment Contamination / Prevention & Control, Cross Infection / Prevention & Control, Disposable Equipment, Infection Control / Methods

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Single-use gastroscope


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Subject is planned to undergo gastroscopy for any indication either outpatient or inpatient The subject is ≥ 18 years old Specifically for the Netherlands: - The subject is capable to understand the information required to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Terminally ill patients Patients whose condition in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with adequately assessing the study outcomes Patients that participate in other investigational studies which would interfere with the outcomes of this study

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Multi-center prospective consecutive observational cases series study
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Adults patients treated with single use gastroscope<br>Patients will be treated with a single-use gastroscope instead of a reusable gastroscope. The procedure will be performed as normal, no additional actions will be performed. | Device: Single-use gastroscope<br>* Adults patients are treated with a single use gastroscope instead of a reusable gastroscope<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Performance of a single use gastroscope, Ambu aScope gastro, for esophagogastroduodenoscopy | Is the endoscopist able to complete the desired diagnostics/therapeutics during the EGD | 4 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Qualitative assessment of the single-use gastroscope | Qualitative assessment of the single-use gastroscope, Ambu aScope gastro, compared to the experience only having used re-usable devices by means of a questionnaire answered by the endoscopist post-EGD. The following characteristics will be rated on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from much worse to much better: Ease of intubation Ease of intubating duodenum Completeness of inspection of the upper digestive track Image quality Handling Lighting Color reproduction Air delivery Therapeutics | 4 months | 
| Complications of EGD | Complications of EGD including pain post-EGD, bleeding, perforation, and 30-day post-gastroscopy infection rates | 4 months | 
| Incidence of switching to reusable endoscope |  | 4 months | 
| Time to complete procedure |  | 4 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Single-use gastroscope, Equipment Contamination, Performance