Incorporating ePrognosis for the Encouragement of Smarter Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This clinical trial assesses the feasibility and acceptability of a smarter screening intervention for breast and colorectal cancer in older adults. This study aims to learn more about how to support patients and physicians in making cancer screening decisions for older adults.

Detailed Description
-----------------
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Complete development of and refine Smarter Screening, a multi-component, patient-centered intervention centered around ePrognosis: Cancer Screening to facilitate shared decision-making screening discussions for breast and colorectal cancer in older adults. II. Assess feasibility and acceptability of the Smarter Screening intervention and assess its impact versus usual care on shared decision-making about whether or not to continue breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among multi-ethnic and socioeconomically diverse primary care patients. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Impact on breast and CRC screening versus usual care. II. Risk perception, worry, and a patient-reported measure of decision quality. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants receive Passport to Health booklet and complete ePrognosis before scheduled primary care visit. ARM II: Participants receive usual care before scheduled primary care visit. After completion of study, participants are followed up at 1 week post primary care visit.

Official Title
-----------------
Incorporating ePrognosis to Encourage Smarter Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Conditions
-----------------
Breast Carcinoma, Colorectal Carcinoma

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Best Practice
* Other: Informational Intervention
* Other: Questionnaire Administration
* Other: Survey Administration


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age 70 years and above Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study Ability of individual to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it Have no prior history of cancer Scheduled for an upcoming appointment in University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) General Internal Medicine or Women's Health Primary Care clinics English-speaking Exclusion Criteria: Contraindication to any study-related procedure or assessment Non-English speaking Are under the current medical care of either the study primary investigator (PI) or co-investigator (Co-I)

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Screening
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Arm I (Passport to Health booklet, ePrognosis)<br>Participants receive Passport to Health booklet and complete ePrognosis before scheduled primary care visit. | Other: Informational Intervention<br>* Receive Passport to Health booklet<br>Other: Questionnaire Administration<br>* Complete ePrognosis<br>|
| Active Comparator: Arm II (usual care)<br>Participants receive usual care before scheduled primary care visit. | Other: Best Practice<br>* Receive usual care<br>* Other names: standard therapy;Other: Survey Administration<br>* Ancillary studies<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of participants enrolled | Ability to successfully recruit the target of approximately 40 patients will be determined by the overall number of participants who were screened for enrollment compared to the overall number of participants who were randomized to one of the groups. | 6 months | 
| Proportion of primary care physicians (PCPs) enrolled | Ability to successfully recruit PCPs will be determined by the overall number of physicians who were contacted compared to the overall number of physicians who actively participated over the course of the study. | 6 months | 
| Percentage of participants enrolled at 6 months | The investigators aim to attain at least 75% of recruited patients in each arm at the 6 month follow-up. | 6 months | 
| Proportion of participants who received an ePrognosis report | The proportion of participants who received an ePrognosis report will be reported | 6 months | 
| Proportion of physicians who utilized the ePrognosis clinician report | All enrolled intervention PCPs will receive a web-based survey after each patient visit to record whether the physicians used and/or discussed ePrognosis in that visit. The proportion of physicians who use the ePrognosis clinician report in their cancer screening counseling with participants/patients will be reported | 6 months | 
| Responses to Qualitative Acceptability survey | A survey will be provided to PCPs and used to measure acceptability of the ePrognosis report by asking patients and providers to provide feedback about the intervention, including likes and dislikes, and future recommendation of using the report provided. | 6 months |