Comparative Study Between Two Physiotherapy Protocols Conventional X Accelerated in Individuals Undergoing Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The accelerated rehabilitation and early return does not seem to be harmful, but still needs further research to define the rehabilitation time is what shows Kruse and collaborators (2012) in their study of systematic review. The surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury is the gold standard in the treatment of these injuries in young and active, the postoperative rehabilitation is extensive and full return to sport occurs only after 6 months postoperatively. Based on this gap, the investigators seek to draw properly through our study methods and more complex techniques, that comparing two rehabilitation programs can achieve high precision early rehabilitation. This will include 32 athletes who had complete ACL rupture confirmed by MRI and underwent ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon.All subjects will be followed from the pre-surgery, the fourth and sixth month after surgery with: KT1000 measures the ligamentous laxity, knee function by applying the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000); Isokinetic Muscle Strength (Cybex). Through a random draw of sealed envelopes, patients will be allocated in their rehabilitation groups: Accelerated (4 months) or Conventional (6 months). Preoperatively, fourth and sixth month after surgery will be an assessment of laxity by (KT1000), Muscular Strength (CYBEX) and knee function affected by IKDC (2000) and Hop Test. The assessor and the patients were blinded to treatment group. This study will have the locus Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, São Paulo. The comparative results of the two groups are analyzed using specific statistical tests to prove an improved significative without damaging the integrity of the graft.

Detailed Description
-----------------
All subjects will be followed for a period of six months. During this period will undergo three stages of evaluation. º Preoperative up to two years following injury : assessment will consist KT1000 measures the ligamentous laxity, knee function by applying the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000); Hop Test (jumps with one leg); Isokinetic Muscle Strength (Cybex). º 4º months pós-surgery KT1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000); Hop Test; Isokinetic Muscle Strength (Cybex) º 6º months postoperatively KT1000, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) + Hop Test; Isokinetic Muscle Strength (Cybex)

Official Title
-----------------
Comparative Study Between Two Physiotherapy Protocols Conventional X Accelerated in Individuals Undergoing Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Conditions
-----------------
Rehabilitation, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Knee

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Nonaccelerated Rehabilitation
* Other: Accelerated Rehabilitation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: With diagnosis of injury (primary) anterior cruciate ligament confirmed by magnetic resonance may or may not be associated with a meniscal injury or partial ligament medial collateral ligament (MCL) surgery is not indicated. Patients undergo surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who had changes in diagnosis during surgery. Surgical complications Patients with More than 30% of lack or abandon physiotherapy.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 45 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Conventional group<br>Nonaccelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Other: Nonaccelerated Rehabilitation<br>* Nonaccelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 6 months of recovery.<br>|
| Experimental: Accelerated group<br>Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Other: Accelerated Rehabilitation<br>* Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 4 months of recovery.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| KT1000 measures | Measure of anterior knee stability | Sixth months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) | Questionnaire function subjective of the knee | Sixth months | 
| Hop Test measures | Jump with one leg | sixth months | 
| Isokinetic of the knee measures | Knee Muscle Strength (Cybex). | sixth months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Knee, Rehabilitation