Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Sedation is defined as the act of administrating a sedative drug to produce a state of calm or sleep. Sedation is commonly given to a patient in hospital settings to provide a tolerable and pleasant experience by relieving anxiety, pain and discomfort, as well as to expedite the duration of the procedure. Moderate sedation (conscious sedation) is the preferred state of sedation, whereby self-maintenance of ventilation and hemodynamic stability is achieved. The primary objective of this study is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane is a more superior sedative agent in terms of faster psychomotor recovery and time taken to fulfil discharge criteria when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation. Secondary objective is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane sedation has better patient's and endoscopist's satisfaction when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

Detailed Description
-----------------
A randomized controlled trial study was done on patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a single tertiary Centre in Malaysia. The study was approved by University Malaya Medical Centre medical research ethics committee. All patients gave written and informed consent. Patients were fasted, and three psychometric tests were performed as a baseline before sedation. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive IV Midazolam (Group M) or inhalational Sevoflurane (Group S) via nasal mask. Standard monitoring was applied. Patients in Sevoflurane group received the inhalational agent via a nasal mask with stepwise increment until and Observed Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale of 3 or maximum 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration was achieved. Patients in Midazolam group were given a stat dose of IV Midazolam 2.5mg. Both groups received 30mcg of IV Fentanyl and lignocaine 1% gargle prior to the procedure. The unblinded observer monitored the level of sedation and recorded the patient's vital signs. A second blinded observer performed the psychometric tests before and at the end of the procedure. He also recorded the time to fulfil discharge criteria as well as the satisfaction scores from the patient and endoscopist.

Official Title
-----------------
A Comparative Study Between Inhalational Sevoflurane Sedation With Intravenous Midazolam Sedation for Upper Endoscopy Procedure.

Conditions
-----------------
Gastro Esophageal Reflux, Gastric Ulcer, Sedation Complication

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: Sevoflurane
* Drug: Midazolam injection


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: ASA I to II Patients who are not taking sedative agents prior to procedure. Patients who are able to give consent for the procedure. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with ischaemic heart disease, respiratory diseases and cerebrovascular disease. Patients who are taking opioid or sedative medications 24 hours before procedure. Patients with previous history of adverse effects to Sevoflurane or Midazolam. Pregnant patients. Patients with airway obstructions. Patients with features of difficult airway such as limited neck extension, small mouth opening of less than 3 cm, mallampati score of more than 3. Patients who are at risk of aspiration. Impaired gag reflex, presence of neurological disorders and impaired physical mobility.
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Patients are randomized to either the Sevoflurane sedation arm or the Midazolam sedation arm based on a randomizer application and the selections are placed in a non-transparent envelope. Once a patient fulfills the eligibility to be recruited in the study, one envelope will be taken to see which arm will the patient be recruited into. Neither the patient nor the investigator will know.
Masking: Triple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Group S (inhalational Sevoflurane sedation)<br>The inhalational anaesthetic agent and oxygen will be delivered via an anaesthetic circuit with a vaporizer (Sevotec 3, Ohmeda, Streeton UK) with a nasal mask. Patients who are allocated for Sevoflurane will be given initial oxygen flow of 8L/min and then Sevoflurane was introduced at a concentration of 0.2% and was increased stepwise by 02% for every 30s up to a maximum of 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC; 2.05% end tidal). Patient's deepest sedation was recorded and adjusted to achieve optimal Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation Scale (OAAS) score of 3. Inadequate or over sedation was treated by reducing or increasing the Sevoflurane concentration dial by 0.2 - 0.6% until the desired effect is reached. Full vital signs monitoring are done for every participant | Drug: Sevoflurane<br>* Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes: Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5 Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator<br>|
| Active Comparator: Group M (Intravenous Midazolam sedation)<br>Patients who are allocated for Midazolam will be given the similar nasal mask delivering 8L/min oxygen. However, Sevoflurane will not be introduced to these patients. Midazolam is titrated slowly to achieve OAAS score of 3 but no more than 2.5mg is to be given within 2 minutes period to patients selected to be in Midazolam group. Inadequate sedation is treated by giving slow titration of the medication based on the unblinded observer's judgement. Over sedation is treated by withholding the midazolam and continuing oxygen supplementation until the patient returned to the desired sedation level. No other sedative agents are allowed to be given to the patient or else patient will be excluded from this study. | Drug: Midazolam injection<br>* Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes: Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5 Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Psychomotor recovery time | Pre procedure psychomotor tests baseline scores will be obtained and compared with post procedure scores. Time to achieve baseline recovery scores will be taken and used to compare between the two sedative agents. | 30 minutes from completion of procedure | 
| Time taken to fulfil discharge criteria | Patient would have to fulfil a set of discharge criteria to ensure that patient is safe for discharge. | One day | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Patient and endoscopists satisfaction | Patient will answer a set of questionnaires to gauge the satisfaction of the sedation agent. Endoscopists will score their satisfaction with a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 - 3 being (dissatisfied), 4-6 (satisfied), and 7 - 10 (very satisfied) | Post procedure on the same setting not more than one day duration | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Sevoflurane, Midazolam, upper endoscopy, recovery, discharge time