linjc16/ctgov huggingface dataset:
Inpatient Screening Mammography for Non-adherent and High Risk Women

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The investigators propose to pilot a program that will evaluate the feasibility of an inpatient screening mammography for non-adherent and high risk hospitalized women age 52-74 admitted to the medicine services at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center and Howard County General Hospital. The two key activities include: inpatient breast care education with educational handouts and offering inpatient screening mammography. Inpatient screening mammography will be offered to non-adherent (last screening mammogram more than 24 months ago) and high risk (Gail 5-year risk of breast cancer 1.6 or greater) women. This pilot program will thus evaluate the feasibility of an inpatient screening mammography as an innovative approach to increase breast cancer screening among non-adherent and high risk women.

Official Title
-----------------
Inpatient Screening Mammography for Non-adherent and High Risk Women

Conditions
-----------------
Breast Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Screening mammography


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: women between 50 and 74 years of age who were non-adherent to breast screening guidelines Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a history of breast cancer or mastectomy history of other cancers (except skin) serious comorbidities making patient's life expectancy <10 years

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 50 Years
Maximum Age: 74 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Inpatient screening mammography for non-adherent and high risk<br>All non-adherent women were offered inpatient screening mammography during hospitalization | Other: Screening mammography<br>* The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of securing inpatient breast cancer screening mammograms for non-adherent hospitalized women prior to hospital discharge.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of women who underwent a screening mammography during hospitalization | Screening mammography is done during hospitalization. Proportion of women that get the screening will be assessed. | Prior to hospital discharge, up to 1 year | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Breast Cancer Screening, Mammography
Prone-position CT for Diagnosing Inguinal Hernia

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of prone-position computed tomography (CT) for detecting and classifying inguinal hernia relative to supine-position CT before laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia by physical examination underwent abdominal CT in the supine and prone positions for preoperative assessment. The anatomy of the right and left inguinal regions was confirmed during the surgery and compared with the preoperative CT findings.

Official Title
-----------------
Diagnosis of Inguinal Hernia by Prone- vs. Supine-position Computed Tomography

Conditions
-----------------
Hernia, Inguinal

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Radiation: supine- and prone-position Computed Tomography


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: inguinal hernia Exclusion Criteria: emergency surgery for incarcerated hernia femoral hernia recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 20 Years
Maximum Age: 89 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Other: cross-sectional study<br> | Radiation: supine- and prone-position Computed Tomography<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The detection rate of inguinal hernia |  | two years |
Performance of the Water-Enema Computed Tomography (WE-CT)

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The WE-CT is an innovative and easy practice imaging technique of colon tumors; it is based on the colon distension by a high volume of warm water and a multidetector CT acquisition after IV (intravenous) contrast, allowing image analysis including the wall thickness and enhancement, the pericolic adjacent spaces and the entire abdomen. The goal of the study is the evaluation of its performances for the diagnosis of colon tumors.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluation of the Water-Enema Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Colon Tumor

Conditions
-----------------
Colon Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Water-Enema Computed Tomography


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Written informed consent WE-TC indication for colon tumor suspicion Age > 18 years Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Patients under 65 years old and for whom the only WE-TC indication is familial antecedents of colon tumor, without clinical or para-clinical personal signs for this pathology Infected sigmoid diverticulosis Occlusive syndrome Anesthesia contraindications Anal incontinence Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 150 micromol/L) Iode allergy Visceralgine contraindications Scania contraindications

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Procedure: Water-Enema Computed Tomography|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| To evaluate the performances of the WE-CT in patients suspected of having a colon tumor |  |  | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| To show the CT findings in case of colon tumor and its pitfalls |  |  | 
| To demonstrate the advantages of the WE-CT compared to the CT and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography for the diagnosis and local staging of colon tumors |  |  | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Water-Enema Computed Tomography, colon tumor, coloscopy, suspicion of colon tumor, coloscopy or surgery
Short-term MRI for Treatment Response Evaluation/Prediction of HCC Treated With TARE

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study aims to investigate the value of early change at MRI in HCC treated with TARE, for evaluation/prediction of treatment response and prognosis.

Official Title
-----------------
Short Term Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Treatment Response Evaluation and Prognosis Prediction in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treated With Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE)

Conditions
-----------------
Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Diagnostic Test: MRI


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Intermediate or locally advanced HCC according to Hong Kong Liver Cancer guideline Scheduled for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Any absolute or relative contra-indication of contrast-enhanced MRI History of other local treatment before TARE in 3 weeks

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 20 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Other
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: HCC group<br>Participants who are scheduled for TARE for HCC treatment. They undergo MRI three times- before, 1- and 2-week after TARE. | Diagnostic Test: MRI<br>* liver MRI using standard dose of extracellular agent. It includes dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion weighted image.<br>* Other names: magnetic resonance imaging;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Treatment response mRECIST | treatment response using mRECIST | 1 month after last MRI | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tumor diffusion | measured with diffusion-weighted image sequence | 1 months after last MRI | 
| Tumor perfusion | measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging | 1 months after last MRI | 
| Treatment response LI-RADS | treatment response using LI-RADSv 2018 treatment response category | 1 months after last MRI | 
| Treatment response volumetric | treatment response using volumetric response criteria | 1 months after last MRI | 
| Time to Progression | Time until to definite progression on follow-up images | 24 months after TARE | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
MRI
Patient Sleep Position Questionnaire

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
You are being asked to participate in this study because we would like to know if sleeping may affect eye pressure.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Completion of the questionnaire is done solely for research purposes and is not part of your routine care. Approximate duration- Up to 10 minutes to complete the questionnaire.

Official Title
-----------------
Patient Sleep Position Questionnaire

Conditions
-----------------
Sleep

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Glaucoma Age-matched controls Adults Exclusion Criteria: Medical students Children

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
sleep
Ultrasound to Predict a Pediatric Difficult Airway and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Children

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This is a prospective study to see whether ultrasonography can predict difficult airway and/or predict obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in children.

Conditions
-----------------
Difficult Airway, Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Ultrasound


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Children with known or suspected difficult direct laryngoscopy identified by either ENT or anesthesiologist. Children with difficult tracheal intubation aged 1 month - 18 years old Children with obstructive sleep apnea aged 1 year - 8 years old Exclusion Criteria: Parent/ patient refusal to participate in study

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 1 Month
Maximum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Other: Difficult Airway<br>Children with a history of difficult airway intubation. | Procedure: Ultrasound<br>* Ultrasound to measure hyo-mental distance, tonsil size and width of the tongue.<br>|
| Other: Obstructive Sleep Apnea<br>Children with a history of obstructive sleep apnea. | Procedure: Ultrasound<br>* Ultrasound to measure hyo-mental distance, tonsil size and width of the tongue.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Hyo-mental distance | The distance from the hyoid bone to the mentum to predict difficult airway. | intraoperative | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tongue width | Width of the tongue between the lingual arteries. | intraoperative | 
| Tonsil Size | Size of tonsil (bilateral) | intraoperative |
Effects of ACEI on Bone Turnover

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The investigators hypothesize that older persons (≥45 years) treated with ACEI for HTN control will have: i) improved status of bone turnover (decreased P1NP and CTX), and ii) decreased levels of RANKL and RANKL/OPG, compared to those not treated with ACEI and not using RAS-related medications

Official Title
-----------------
Effects of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) on Bone Turnover

Conditions
-----------------
Bone Turnover Status in Hypertensive Patients

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: at least 45 years of age a diagnosis of (either new or uncontrolled) HTN who will need a new medication for HTN control able to consent (no medial issues impairing judgment for consenting based on clinical providers' judgment). Exclusion Criteria: younger than 45 years of age a diagnosis of metabolic bone disease a diagnosis of osteoporosis or use of medication to treat osteoporosis a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, or renal insufficiency, or cancer history of allergy to ACEI or ARB, 6) history of use of ACEI or ARB.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 45 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in serum CTX levels in pg/mL |  | baseline, 3 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
ACE inhibitor
Outcomes of Surgery of Aortic Valve

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Overall Goal: To study the outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve surgeries, different approaches such as standard aortic valve replacement, aortic valve repair, novel techniques as Ozaki's procedure and their subsequent results and complications. Objective 1: Identify predictors of complications following different types of aortic valve surgery accordingly. Objective 2: Determine the value of each type in terms of advantages and disadvantages. Objective3: Assess outcomes such as postoperative life expectancy, hospital stay, prognosis and quality of life.

Official Title
-----------------
Outcomes of Different Modalities for Surgery of Aortic Valve

Conditions
-----------------
Aortic Valve Disease

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Aortic valve replacement


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve lesion. Asymptomatic aortic insufficiency patients with left ventricular dysfunction or significant left ventricular dilatation (LV end diastolic diameter>70 mm or LV end systolic diameter>50 mm. Patients with aortic regurgitation caused by: a dilated aortic annulus conjoined cusp prolapse in bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) single cusp prolapse in tricuspid aortic valves aortic valve cusp perforation from endocarditis Exclusion Criteria: Patients with previous aortic root or valve surgery.
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Aortic valve replacement<br>using different ways of aortic valve replacement either by prosthetic valves or by ozaki technique | Procedure: Aortic valve replacement<br>* Aortic valve surgery<br>* Other names: Ozaki procedure;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Outcomes of different techniques of aortic valve surgery in the indicated patients for each type of surgery such as : | Number of days of postoperative hospital stay. | Up to one week |
Intervention to Promote Water Consumption in School Lunchrooms

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study, randomized, delivered, and analyzed at the school level, evaluated the effect of simple, structural changes to school lunch rooms to make drinking water easier for students during lunch time. Half of the schools received posters promoting drinking water and installed cup dispensers stocked with cups next to lunchroom water fountains, while the other half received no intervention. The intervention outcomes were average water consumption and the proportion of students in the lunchroom who opted to drink water, as well as the proportion of students with sugary drinks at lunch. No identifying information on individual children was collected.

Official Title
-----------------
Grab a Cup, Fill it up! An Intervention to Promote Convenience of Drinking Water and Increase Student Water Consumption During School Lunch.

Conditions
-----------------
Water Consumption, Schools

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Grab a Cup, Fill it Up


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: School in Boston Public School district in Boston, MA; had to have plumbed drinking water access in school cafeteria - Exclusion Criteria: School had no plumbed drinking water access in cafeteria. -
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Intervention<br> | Other: Grab a Cup, Fill it Up<br>* The intervention involved installing promotional posters encouraging students to drink water as well as cup dispensers stocked with disposable 5 ounce cups near water fountains in school lunchrooms.<br>|
| No Intervention: Control<br> | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in average student water consumption at lunch |  | March 2013-June 2013, up to 4 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in proportion of students drinking water at lunch |  | March 2013-June 2013, up to 4 months | 
| Change in proportion of students with sugar-sweetened beverages at lunch |  | March 2013-June 2013, up to 4 months |
Angiographie and OCT in Macula and Retinal Diseases

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to investigate the morphological and angiological retinal changes in different macular diseases.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Recently, a new generation of OCT devices relying on spectral domain technology (SD-OCT) has been introduced and allows for higher-resolution imaging. Based on this technology we can identify variable changes at the retinal surface such as, retinal thickening with cyst formation, swelling in the inner and outer nuclear layers and subretinal fluid. The introduction of an eye-tracking mode has allowed a better insight into the development of retinal morphologic changes The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and structural morphology of PCME after successful uncomplicated cataract surgery in patients with previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and indocyanine green-assisted peeling of an epiretinal membrane and the internal limiting membrane (ILM).

Conditions
-----------------
Macular Edema

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: previous 23-gauge PPV and ILM peeling Exclusion Criteria: history of branch retinal vein occlusion central retinal vein occlusion wet macular degeneration diabetic retinopathy uveitis or other inflammatory eye disease.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Healthy volunteers<br> | |
| St.p. Pars plana vitrectomy<br> | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
vitrectomy, cataract, macular edema