A Comparison of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Terms of Lower Limb Blood Flow

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a life threatening condition and a serious concern among hospitalized patients, with death occurring in approximately 6% of cases. It involves the formation of a clot where stagnant blood flow occurs, predominantly in the deep veins of the legs. Three mechanisms underlie DVT, venous stasis (slowing or stopping of the blood), hypercoagulability (increased clotting) and damage to blood vessel endothelium (damage to blood vessel wall), collectively known as Virchow's triad. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) have been shown to improve lower limb blood flow. However, few studies have directly compared the two methods and those that have, have used dated NMES techniques. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods in terms of blood flow.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a life threatening condition and a serious concern among hospitalized patients, with death occurring in approximately 6% of cases. It involves the formation of a clot where stagnant blood flow occurs, predominantly in the deep veins of the legs. Three mechanisms underlie DVT, venous stasis (slowing or stopping of the blood), hypercoagulability (increased clotting) and damage to blood vessel endothelium (damage to blood vessel wall), collectively known as Virchow's triad. Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) involves the use of an inflatable cuff placed around the limb. This cuff inflates and deflates intermittently in order to squeeze blood from the underlying veins. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) leads to a contraction of muscles by delivering a series of controlled electrical pulses via skin surface electrodes placed over the motor points of the targeted muscle. Both IPC and NMES have been shown to improve lower limb blood flow. However, few studies have directly compared the two methods and those that have, have used dated NMES techniques. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods in terms of lower limb haemodynamics.

Official Title
-----------------
A Comparison of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Terms of Lower Limb Haemodynamics

Conditions
-----------------
Venous Thrombosis

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Duo-STIM neuromuscular electrical stimulator
* Device: AV Impulse System Model 6000


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Free from any known illness. Between 18 and 40 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: History of heart/respiratory problems Pregnancy Presence of implants, including cardiac pacemakers or orthopaedic implants History of a neurological disorder History of severe arterial disease or known dermatological problems.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 40 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Prevention
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: DVT Prophylaxis<br>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is to be applied using a custom-built, two-channel stimulator (Duo-STIM (stimulator), Bioelectronics Research Cluster, National University of Ireland, Galway) with a frequency of 36 Hz, a balanced biphasic waveform with a pulse width of 350μs, a ramp up time of 500ms, a contraction time of 1s and a ramp down time of 500ms. Stimulation is to be applied every 20 seconds over a period of 5 minutes. Intermittent pneumatic compression is to be applied using the Novamedix A-V Impulse System Model 6000 (Novamedix distribution Limited, England), programmed to deliver compression every 20 seconds at a pressure of 130 mmHg for a 1 second duration over a period of 5 minutes. | Device: Duo-STIM neuromuscular electrical stimulator<br> <br> Device: AV Impulse System Model 6000<br> <br> * Other names: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Blood Flow Measurements from the Lower Limb | Doppler measurements must be taken for each of the interventions. The measurement site of interest is the popliteal vein, located at the lateral aspect of the knee, below the sapheno-popliteal junction. Peak venous velocity, time averaged mean velocity, vein cross-sectional area and volume flow are required. A minimum of 3 measurements per intervention is required for rigor. Do not take any measurement within the first minute of the intervention | An hour and a half (plus or minus half an hour) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Blood Pressure |  | An hour and a half (plus or minus half an hour) | 
| Heart Rate |  | An hour and a half (plus or minus half an hour) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Deep Vein Thrombosis, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, Doppler Ultrasound