The PulsePoint Study

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether use of the PulsePoint system increases bystander CPR or defibrillator use compared to standard dispatch procedures in patients who suffer non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a public location. Half of all suspected cardiac arrest 9-1-1 calls in a public location will receive PulsePoint alerts (treatment arm). The other half of this eligible patient cohort will receive standard dispatch procedures (control arm).

Detailed Description
-----------------
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health problem. More than 45,000 Canadians suffer OHCA annually, with only 8.4% surviving to hospital discharge. Early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillator use can save lives but are rarely done. Advances in mobile device technology have allowed the development of a system which can notify CPR-trained citizens within 400 meters of a possible cardiac arrest. The PulsePoint mobile device application (www.pulsepoint.org) empowers them to respond and provide basic life support while professional crews are being dispatched. When a mobile device receives the alert data from the PulsePoint system, the application presents a map showing the exact location of the emergency and the closest public access defibrillator. PulsePoint will be implemented in 3 regions across Canada and the US (British Columbia, Winnipeg, and Columbus, Ohio). After a coordinated marketing campaign in each participating region to maximize the number of mobile device application downloads in the community, 9-1-1 calls for suspected cardiac arrest will be randomized to conventional dispatch for suspected cardiac arrest versus conventional dispatch plus PulsePoint notifications. The primary outcome will be bystander CPR or defibrillator use prior to professional responders arriving on scene. The primary analysis will involve comparing outcomes between the control and treatment groups among randomized patients who satisfy inclusion and exclusion criteria and have at least one PulsePoint responder within 400 meters of the cardiac arrest event. The investigators hypothesize that the PulsePoint system will have an immediate impact on increasing bystander CPR and defibrillator use in participating communities. In the long term, this project will provide valuable data on how effective PulsePoint is with respect to bystander resuscitation and survival. The data will directly inform policy decisions about PulsePoint implementation in the participating communities and guide other North American jurisdictions around these policy decisions in the future.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluating the PulsePoint Mobile Device Application to Increase Bystander Resuscitation for Victims of Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Conditions
-----------------
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Heart Arrest, Heart Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: PulsePoint notification


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with 911 calls assigned as suspected or confirmed cardiac arrest and, Are confirmed to be EMS-treated, public location out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Exclusion Criteria: Traumatic cardiac arrest, or Cardiac arrests occurring in the context of a dangerous scene as determined by the 9-1-1 call-taker, or EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest, or Cardiac arrests not treated by EMS (Do Not Resuscitate, signs of obvious death), or Cardiac arrests occurring in nursing homes and health care facilities.
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Conventional Emergency Dispatch PLUS PulsePoint notification<br>Eligible 911 calls randomized to the experimental arm of the study will undergo usual dispatch of emergency services personnel as per pre-existing local protocols and activation of the PulsePoint system. When triggered, the system will push location data to all PulsePoint mobile application users within 400 meters of the emergency. Devices receiving the alerts from the PulsePoint system will alarm with auditory, tactile and visual stimuli. The application will present a map showing the exact location of the emergency and the closest public access defibrillator. | Other: PulsePoint notification<br>* The PulsePoint interface software monitors each 9-1-1 call on dispatch computers and is automatically triggered by particular conditions including call type (e.g. suspected cardiac arrest) and location type (public location). When triggered, the system pushes location data to all PulsePoint mobile application users within 400 meters of the emergency location. When a mobile device running the PulsePoint Respond application receives the alert data from the PulsePoint system, the device alarms with auditory, tactile (vibration) and visual stimuli. The application presents a map showing the exact location of the suspected cardiac arrest and the closest public access defibrillator.<br>|
| No Intervention: Conventional Emergency Dispatch<br>Patients randomized to the control arm will receive conventional emergency medical dispatching procedures as per pre-existing local protocols (e.g. dispatch of emergency vehicles, attempted dispatch-assisted CPR) without activation of the PulsePoint system. 911 calls randomized to the control arm will not be associated with any PulsePoint alerts. | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of patients receiving bystander resuscitation | Defined as the occurrence of either bystander CPR (chest compressions and or ventilations) or bystander application of a defibrillator prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. | Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes. | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as the occurrence of bystander CPR (chest compressions and or ventilations) prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. | Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes. | 
| Proportion of patients receiving bystander defibrillator use (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as bystander application of defibrillator pads on the chest of the victim prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. | Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes. | 
| Proportion of patients receiving bystander defibrillator shock delivered (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as the occurrence of a bystander applying an automated external defibrillator and then applying a defibrillatory shock to the chest of the victim. | Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes. | 
| Proportion of patients with return of spontaneous circulation (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as any palpable pulse or measurable blood pressure. | Patients are followed from EMS arrival on scene until arrival at hospital, an expected average of 35 minutes. | 
| Proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as survival of a patient to the point of discharge from the acute care hospital. Discharge may be to a residence or long term care facility. | Patients are followed until death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days. | 
| Proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge with good functional outcome (secondary effectiveness outcome) | Defined as the occurrence of a patient surviving to hospital discharge with a Modified Rankin Score of 0,1, 2 or 3. | Patients are followed until death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days. | 
| EMS response time interval (secondary safety outcome) | Defined as the time interval between the 9-1-1 call and the EMS arrival on scene. | Expected average of 5 minutes. | 
| EMS on scene time interval (secondary safety outcome) | Defined as the time interval between the EMS arrival on scene to EMS departure from scene. | Expected average of 30 minutes. | 
| Proportion of patients receiving bystander interference with the resuscitation effort (secondary safety outcome) | Defined as emergency medical service crew reports of bystander interference with the resuscitation effort. | Patients will be followed for this outcome in the time interval between 9-1-1 call and EMS departure from scene, an expected average of 35 minutes. | 
| Number of PulsePoint application downloads (secondary system performance outcomes) | Defined as the number of PulsePoint application downloads in each participating community. | Downloads in the participating communities will be tracked for the duration of the anticipated 2 year patient recruitment time frame. | 
| Number of PulsePoint application users notified (secondary system performance outcome) | The number of application users notified for each PulsePoint notification. | This will be tracked for each notification event that occurs during the anticipated 2 year accrual time frame. | 
| Sensitivity of PulsePoint activation (secondary system performance outcome) | The sensitivity of the PulsePoint activation as it relates to activation for true cardiac arrests. | This will be tracked for each notification event that occurs during the anticipated 2 year accrual time frame. | 
| False positive rate for PulsePoint activation (secondary system performance outcome) | The false positive rate for PulsePoint activation resulting from activation of the system for conditions other than cardiac arrest. | This will be tracked for each notification event that occurs during the anticipated 2 year accrual time frame. | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Automated External Defibrillators, Smartphones