Enhanced Magnifying Endoscopy for Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
When performing screening endoscopy, small focal gastric lesions are frequently encountered. Novel techniques in endoscopy, such as magnifying endoscopy (ME) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) and chromoendoscopy with acetic acid-indigocarmine mixture (AIM), are developing to enhance images of gastrointestinal tumor. Furthermore, observation of the microstructures of gastric mucosa by ME, including microvascular pattern and microsurface pattern, has been proposed in the recognition of early gastric cancer (EGC). This study is based on the hypothesis as follow: The microvascular structure could be clearly observed with magnifying endoscopy enhanced by narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI). The microsurface architecture could be clearly observed with magnifying endoscopy enhanced by acetic acid-indigocarmine mixture (ME-AIM). Enhanced ME (combining ME-NBI and ME-AIM), as compared to white-light endoscopy (WLE), has higher sensitivity and specificity for the differential diagnosing small focal gastric lesions.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Patients who received surveillance endoscopy for EGC using a zoom endoscope were eligible for inclusion. WLE without magnification was performed first in eligible patients. Based on an assessment of the shape (such as flat, depressed or elevated) and color (pale or reddened), small focal gastric lesions were identified and included for evaluation by experienced endoscopists. When such a lesion was detected during non-magnifying observation with WLE, the mode was then changed to ME-NBI for observation of microvascular pattern and ME-AIM for observation of microsurface pattern subsequently. All endoscopic images of the whole procedure were recorded in digital filing system for later evaluation. To avoid possible selection bias and to maintain the quality of the study, all images of each endoscopic modality (including WLE, ME-NBI, ME-AIM), which were arranged randomly on one slide and displayed independently of the images of other endoscopic modality, were evaluated by 4 skilled endoscopists, who were not access to the clinical and pathological data. The general consensus was established for an assessment of each lesion. Two forceps biopsy specimens were taken from each lesion and pathological diagnosis were used as the criterion standard for cancer diagnosis.

Official Title
-----------------
A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Enhanced Magnifying Endoscopy for Differential Diagnosis of Small Focal Gastric Lesions Identified With White-light Endoscopy

Conditions
-----------------
Stomach Neoplasms

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Patients, in which small focal gastric lesions were identified with conventional WLE, were enrolled in this study. Before being enrolled, all patients provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who cannot undergo gastroscopies due to unsuitable conditions Referred patients with a history of having being diagnosed as gastric cancer Patients with a personal history of gastric surgery Patients who cannot provide informed consent Patients with advanced gastric cancer

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 40 Years
Maximum Age: 85 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Diagnostic accuracy of enhanced ME (combining ME-NBI and ME-AIM) | Enhanced ME diagnosis was made subsequent to endoscopy procedure and reviewed in a week when confirmed histopathologic diagnosis was out for comparison. Percentage of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of enhanced ME diagnosis compared with histopathology diagnosis were measured. | 1 week | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Diagnostic accuracy of WLE | WLE diagnosis was made subsequent to endoscopy procedure and reviewed in a week when confirmed histopathologic diagnosis was out for comparison. Percentage of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of WLE diagnosis compared with histopathology diagnosis were measured. | 1 week | 
| The relationships between the microvascular patterns and the histopathological findings | The microvascular pattern of each lesion was evaluated subsequent to endoscopy procedure and reviewed in a week when confirmed histopathologic diagnosis was out for comparison. Percentage of distribution of different microvascular patterns compared with histopathology diagnosis was measured. | 1 week | 
| The relationships between the microsurface patterns and the histopathological findings | The microsurface pattern of each lesion was evaluated subsequent to endoscopy procedure and reviewed in a week when confirmed histopathologic diagnosis was out for comparison. Percentage of distribution of different microsurface patterns compared with histopathology diagnosis was measured. | 1 week | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Stomach Neoplasms, early gastric cancer, magnifying endoscopy, narrow band imaging, acetic acid, indigocarmine