linjc16/ctgov huggingface dataset:
Observational Study of Parental Feeding Practices to Improve Child's Food Intake and Weight Status

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Background: A topic of interest in the etiology of child obesity is if and how parental feeding behaviors are associated with child food intake and weight status. Objectives: The objective was to explore if and how directive (overt) and non-directive (covert and food environmental structure) types of parental feeding control were associated with children's food intake and weight status. Design: This was a cross-sectional, exploratory study using structural equation modeling to determine directional associations between maternal feeding practices and their child's food intakes and weight status. Researchers collected data from 330 dyads of 3-5yr children and mothers participating in a federal preschool program for low-income families (Head Start) in Michigan. Mothers' feeding practices (directive and non-directive control), children's food intakes, height and weight of both mothers and children were measured. Structural equation models tested the relationships between maternal feeding practices, the child's food intake and weight status. Hypotheses: Child weight is negatively associated with parents' directive feeding control practices. Less directive control or greater non-directive control is associated with healthier food intakes in children.

Official Title
-----------------
The Relationship of Parental Feeding Control Practices to Food Intake of 3-5Yr Children in Families With Limited Incomes

Conditions
-----------------
Obesity, Feeding Behaviors

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Dyads of child (3-5yrs) and the primary female caregiver Participating Head Start program in central Michigan Exclusion Criteria: Children with disability except speech disorders Caregivers younger than 18 years old

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 3 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Weight, Food intakes, Feeding
Clinical Analysis of Pain After Hysterectomy

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Patients undergone either laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy will called for a clinical examination 1-3 years after surgery, if they suffer from pain 6 months after surgery. The aims of the study are: to reveal whether the pain is postsurgical in nature, or if there are any other reasons for the pain. to reveal the type of pain, neuropathic, nociceptive or idiopathic. to reveal the impact of pain on quality of life.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Patients undergone either laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy will called for a clinical examination 1-3 years after surgery, if they suffer from pain 6 months after surgery. All patients were treated in Pirkanmaa District Hospital and the anesthesia was either propofol-infusion or sevoflurane gas with remifentanil-infusion. 6months after the surgery, questionnaires about pelvic pain were sent to the patients. Patients still having pain at that time, were invited for detailed sensory and gynecological examinations.

Official Title
-----------------
Chronic Pain After Hysterectomy, Qualitative Analysis of Pain and Its Impact on Quality of Life

Conditions
-----------------
Postoperative Pain

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: hysterectomy 1-3 years previously suffering from pain 6months postsurgically Exclusion Criteria: -

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 69 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Posthysterectomy pain<br>Observational study on posthysterectomy pain | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Type of Chronic Pain After Hysterectomy | Number of participants with probable neuropathic, possible neuropathic, pain had subsided and other type of pain. | 1-3 years after hysterectomy | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Quality of Life After Hysterectomy | Quality of life as measured by the SF-36, which consists of 8 scales. | 1-3 years after hysterectomy | 
| Is the Pain Due to Hysterectomy? | Number of patients having posthysterectomy pain versus other pain | 1-3 years | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Chronic pain, Hysterectomy, Quality of life
Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patients

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of autologous expanded mesenchymal stem cells intralesional transplantation as a safe and potentially beneficial treatment for patients with spinal cord injury.

Official Title
-----------------
Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patients

Conditions
-----------------
Spinal Cord Injury

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) Scale A, B and C Cervical (under C4), thoracic o lumbar spine lesion Complete or Incomplete SCI Platelet count over 100.000/ul Exclusion Criteria: Acute SCI (less than 3 months) Active infectious diseases Pregnancy Neurodegenerative diseases Primary hematologic diseases Coagulopathies Hepatic dysfunction Pregnancy

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 2 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Mesenchymal Stem cells<br> | Procedure: Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells<br>* Expanded Intralesional Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Safety of Autologous Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells transplantation in SCI patients |  | 3 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Functional improvement in muscle strength | According to motor index score | 1 year | 
| Functional Improvement in sphincters control |  | 1 year | 
| Functional improvement in spasticity control |  | 1 year | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Mesenchymal stem cell, Spinal cord injury
Sleep, Breathing and Psychomotor Performance at Altitude: A Physiologic Study in Healthy Subjects

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study investigates the effect of altitude exposure on sleep, breathing and psychomotor performance in healthy subjects.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Sleep is essential for well being and performance. Sleep disturbances by recurrent apnea and hypoxia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome impair quality of life, cognitive and cardiovascular functions. Similar consequences occur in healthy subjects exposed to hypoxia at altitude due to periodic breathing with recurrent central apnea. This project will investigate effects of altitude on sleep, breathing, psychomotor performance and on the cardiovascular system in healthy subjects and patients with sleep apnea. The results will help to better understand mechanisms of sleep disturbances and psychomotor impairment induced by hypoxia and to prevent adverse effects of altitude exposure.

Official Title
-----------------
Sleep, Breathing and Psychomotor Performance at Altitude: A Physiologic Study in Healthy Subjects

Conditions
-----------------
Healthy Men

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: altitude exposure


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: healthy men residence at <800m Exclusion Criteria: any active disease requiring treatment requirement for regular use of medication smoking, regular intake of alcohol or drugs body mass index <18 or >30 kg/m2 previous intolerance of moderate altitude (<3000m)

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Male

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Other: altitude exposure|exposure to 490m, 1700m and 2590m|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| apnea/hypopnea index |  | day 1-4 at altitude | 
| Reaction time | psychomotor vigilance test reaction time | day 1-4 at altitude | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Psychomotor vigilance | performance in the Motor Task Manager test | day 1-4 at altitude | 
| sleep quality | percent of slow wave sleep, araousal index | day 1-4 at altitude | 
| arterial applanation tonometry | endothelial function and arterial stiffness | day 1-4 at altitude | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
hypoxia, altitude, sleep, sleep apnea, periodic breathing, vigilance, psychomotor, endothelial function
Optimisation of Functional MRI-based Neurofeedback for Alcohol Use Disorders

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Participants will undergo a single session of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based neurofeedback (approximately 1 hour). The investigators will assess their ability to regulate motivational networks of the brain during the exposure to alcohol cues and evaluate immediate effects on craving and cognitive bias for alcohol by administering a questionnaire and a Stroop task before and after the session.

Official Title
-----------------
Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback as a Treatment Tool for Alcohol Dependence - Protocol Optimisation Phase

Conditions
-----------------
Alcohol Abuse

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Neurofeedback


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: History of alcohol use disorder or current alcohol consumption above 21 units (1 unit = 8g) of alcohol per week (male participants) or above 14 units of alcohol per week (female participants) Exclusion Criteria: MRI safety exclusion criteria

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Neurofeedback<br> | Other: Neurofeedback<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Neurofeedback success (brain activation difference during neurofeedback and baseline blocks) | This measure will be based on the analysis of participants' fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) data, reflecting brain activation, during exposure to alcohol cues. Neurofeedback success will be defined as significant difference between activation levels (expressed as beta weights of a linear regression model) during the regulation periods compared to baseline. The significance will be determined by a t-test. | 1 day | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Drinking Urges Questionnaire as a measure of alcohol craving | Measure of alcohol craving | 1 day | 
| Alcohol Stroop task as a measure of cognitive bias | Measure of cognitive bias | 1 day |
Efficacy and Safety of V0111 Cream on Open Cracked Heel in Diabetic Patients With Polyneuropathy.

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the cream V0111 in the treatment of fissure(s) situated on the heels in diabetic patients with polyneuropathy.

Conditions
-----------------
Open Cracked Heel in Diabetic Patients With Polyneuropathy

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Tested product : V0111 cream
* Device: Placebo


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, Cracked open heel with at least one fissure Grade 2, Exclusion Criteria: Open wound, skin infection, haemorrhagic crack on feet, Major static disorder , Ulceration and history of ulceration, Active haemorrhagic crack, Hyperkeratotic disease Diabetic arteriopathy,

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 80 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: V0111<br> | Device: Tested product : V0111 cream<br>* Application twice a day during 28 days<br>|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo<br> | Device: Placebo<br>* Application twice a day during 28 days<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Complete healing of target fissure on the heel | Comparison of the two treatment groups (verum versus placebo) | Day 28 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Foot, Diabetes Complications
Sedentary Behavior in African Americans

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study is designed to develop methods for objectively measuring sedentary behavior, assess the association between objectively measured sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease outcomes, and develop an intervention to reduce sedentary behavior, in African American adults.

Official Title
-----------------
Measurement of Sedentary Behavior in African American Adults

Conditions
-----------------
Cardiovascular Disease

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: self-classify yourself as African American are aged 18 years or older are free of serious medical condition, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, or emphysema. are free of serious medical conditions that would prevent participant from engaging in physical activity. are willing to have a scan completed that measures your body composition are willing to stay in metabolic chamber for 8.5 hours (8:00am until 4:30 pm) are willing to wear an accelerometer for 2, one-week periods following your chamber stay. There will be one week in-between the 2, one-week periods. are willing to complete questionnaire related to your level of activity weigh less than 250 lbs. Exclusion Criteria: unwilling or unable to perform activities in protocol on medications a woman who is intending to become pregnant, or who is pregnant

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Calibration study<br>These individuals were used to develop cut points for sedentary behavior using accelerometers and a metabolic chamber. | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sedentary behavior |  | 2009-2010 | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Blood pressure |  | 2009-2010 | 
| High density lipoproteins |  | 2009-2010 |
Ethical Dilemmas in Anaesthesiology in the Netherlands; a Qualitative Interview Study.

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This study will describe which ethical dilemmas are experienced by anesthesiologist in the Dutch Healthcare system and what the current solving strategies are for these issues. Semi- structured interviews will be conducted with anaesthesiologists employed in different hospitals in the Netherlands..

Detailed Description
-----------------
Ethical considerations are part of a doctors daily practice. The development of anaesthesiologists as ' perioperative' doctors is increasingly giving anaesthesiologists a treatment function. As the third largest medical specialty, they are also involved in ethical dilemmas. Examples of common themes in the literature include:' informed consent' and professionalism. Nevertheless, good research into ethical dilemmas in the field of anaesthesiology is lacking.

Official Title
-----------------
Ethical Dilemmas in Anaesthesiology in the Netherlands; a Qualitative Interview Study.

Conditions
-----------------
Ethical Dilemmas, Ethical Issues, Moral Issues, Moral Dilemmas, Anaesthesiology, Anaesthesiologist

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: no intervention


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. Employed as anaesthesiologist Employed in an academic or non-academic hospital in the Netherlands Exclusion Criteria: Other medical specialists language barrier

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Other: no intervention|Qualitative research through semi-structured interviews|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| interviews (qualitative interview study) | Categories of ethical dilemmas experienced during work as assessed by interviews | 10 years (depends on working experience of the respondent) |
Causes of Complicated Appendicitis at Referral Hospital

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The study was conducted on a medical record of previously treated patients for acute appendicitis at HFSUH, Harar, Ethiopia. The study design was case-control with a total sample size of 402.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The case-control study conducted at HFSUH was proceeded following the university's protocol and after passing institutional ethical review permission.

Official Title
-----------------
Predictors of Complicated Appendicitis Among Patients Presented to Public Referral Hospitals in Harari Region: A Case-control Study

Conditions
-----------------
Complicated Appendicitis

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis Exclusion Criteria: incidental appendectomy patients
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of patients having the predictors of complicated appendicitis. | Clinical histories like duration of chief complaint, constipation, vomiting, fever, visiting to lower level clinics, presence of comorbidities were used to assess the factors associated with complicated appendicitis. | 1 week | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
complicated appendicitis, acute abdomen
Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Self-fixed mesh and postoperative pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, a randomized clinical trial

Detailed Description
-----------------
Pain after inguinal hernia surgery is a major problem for the patient and results in lower quality of life. In this randomized clinical trial we examine if the choice of self-fixed mesh affects post-operative inguinal pain in laparoscopic hernia surgery. 164 patients are randomized and followed up for 1 year.

Official Title
-----------------
Laparscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Does the Choice of Self-fixated Mesh Matter?

Conditions
-----------------
Inguinal Hernia, Surgery

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Adhesix mesh


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: patients with a clinical inguinal hernia, who are operated with laparoscopic surgery in day case surgery Exclusion Criteria: scrotal or incarcerated hernia previous laparotomy ASA >3 BMI <18 or >35 Liver cirrhosis No hernia in clinical examination

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Self-adhesive mesh<br> | Device: Adhesix mesh<br>* 2 meshes are used; the self-gripping Progrip mesh and the self-adhesive Adhesix mesh<br>* Other names: Progrip mesh;|
| Active Comparator: Self-gripping mesh<br> | Device: Adhesix mesh<br>* 2 meshes are used; the self-gripping Progrip mesh and the self-adhesive Adhesix mesh<br>* Other names: Progrip mesh;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pain during the first post-operative week | The degree of pain (VAS score) and the use of pain medication during the first postoperative week | 1 year |