Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Impulsivity and Food-related Impulsivity in Obesity

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
In this study the investigators aim to assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; a safe non-invasive method for modulating the activity of specific brain regions) when applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is able to modulate impulsivity in obese participants.

Detailed Description
-----------------
In this single-blind, sham controlled study, the investigators will assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; a safe non-invasive method for modulating the activity of specific brain regions) when applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is able to modulate impulsivity in obese volunteers. The investigators hypothesize that tDCS applied to the OFC, in comparison to sham tDCS, will significantly reduce impulsivity and enhance decision making as measured by computerized neurocognitive tasks. For this study the investigators will enroll 30 obese individuals aged 18-65 years. Participants will be assessed with a battery of computerized tasks as well as self-reported questionnaires on eating, impulsivity, mood and anxiety. Assessments will be carried out before, during, and after a single 20-minute 2mA tDCS session.

Official Title
-----------------
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Applied Over the Orbitofrontal Cortex on Impulsivity and Decision Making in Obese Subjects

Conditions
-----------------
Impulsive Behavior

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Men or Women aged 18 to 65 have body mass index of 35 or above have had no recent change in medications in the 2 weeks prior participating in the study able to fast for 4 hours prior participating in the study Exclusion Criteria: Active Substance use disorder Active Suicidal ideation Psychoactive Medication Past or current Gambling disorder Past or current Anorexia Past or current Bulimia Nervosa Past or current Psychosis Visual impairments preventing performance of the neuropsychological tasks Epilepsy Traumatic Brain Injury Stroke Neurological disorder affecting motor functions (Parkinsons, Huntington's, etc) Previous participation in tDCS research/treatment

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Experimental: Active Left OFC Group<br>2mA will be applied for 20 minutes with the tDCS anode applied to the left OFC and Cathode applied to the right primary motor cortex. | Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation<br>* Anode placed over the OFC and cathode placed over the right primary motor cortex.<br>* Other names: tDCS;|
| Sham Comparator: Sham Comparator: Sham left OFC Group<br>Current will be ramped up for 30s followed by a 30s ramp down to mimic the physical sensation of stimulation and habituation. The anode placed over the left OFC and cathode placed over the right primary motor cortex. | Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation<br>* Anode placed over the OFC and cathode placed over the right primary motor cortex.<br>* Other names: tDCS;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Probabilistic Decision Making | Net score of the Iowa Gambling Task The net score ranges from -20 to 30. Higher values represent a better outcome (i.e., enhanced decision-making) | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cognitive Control | Interference index in the Stroop Color-word Task. Interference index is the reaction time computed between the presentation of the stimulus and the response of the participant. It typically ranges from 0 to 300 millisecond, with smaller values of reaction time indicate better outcome (i.e., better cognitive control). | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session | 
| Food-specific cognitive control | The interference index in the Food-Stroop Color-Word test. Interference index is the reaction time computed between the presentation of the stimulus and the response of the participant. It typically ranges from 0 to 300 millisecond, with smaller values of reaction time indicate better outcome (i.e., better Food-specific cognitive control). | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session | 
| Delayed discounting | The discount rate for delayed monetary rewards. This rate is quantified by the hyperbolic discounting function using the following equation: V = A/(1+kD), where A presents the value of the delayed reward A at delay D, and k is a free parameter that determines the discount rate, with higher values of k indicate worse outcome (i.e., greater discounting of rewards as a function of time). | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session | 
| Motor impulsivity | The stop-signal reaction time in the Stop-Signal Task. The stop signal reaction time ranges from 50 to 250, where greater values represent worse outcome (i.e, increased motor impulsivity). | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session. | 
| Moderation of effect by self-reported measures of impulsivity and dysregulated eating | Individuals with high levels of impulsivity, impulsive eating, binge eating, self-reported food addiction will show greater moderation by tDCS on our primary and secondary outcomes. Barrat's impulsiveness scale-11 with a range of scores from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater impulsivity. Reward-based eating drive scale-13 with a range of scores from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater uncontrolled eating. Binge eating scale with a range of scores from 0 to 46: minimal binge eating ( >17), moderate binge eating (18-26), and severe binge eating (<27)). Yale Food Addiction Scale with a range of symptom severity from 0 to 7: mild (2-3 symptoms), moderate (4-5 symptoms), severe (6 or more symptoms)). | Before and after a 20-minute tDCS session. |