Working Memory Training for Substance Dependent Individuals

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Background: Substance abusers show impaired working memory (WM) functioning. Promising findings show training WM results in an improved working memory capacity (WMC) and a decrease of clinical symptoms in a range of disorders, including alcohol addiction. Aim: To test the effect of a WM training in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) on substance use, craving, WMC, impulsivity, attention bias and psychopathology. Design: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with a parallel group design. The WM training adapted to participants' WMC whereas the placebo training consisted of non-adaptive easy versions of these tasks. Setting: Two departments of an addiction treatment clinic in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Participants: 120 inpatients diagnosed with an alcohol, cannabis or cocaine dependency who were in treatment as usual . Measurements: Primary outcome measures: Substance use and craving. Secondary outcome measures: WMC, impulsivity, attention bias and psychopathology. Participants were assessed before and after 24 sessions of WM training as well as two months after the training.

Official Title
-----------------
A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial to Working Memory Training in Substance Abusers

Conditions
-----------------
Substance Dependency, Addiction, Anxiety, Depression

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Working memory training
* Behavioral: Placebo training


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Substance dependency: cocaine, cannabis or alcohol Exclusion Criteria: Age below 16 or above 67 Current psychosis Neurological complaints

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 16 Years
Maximum Age: 67 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Working memory training<br> | Behavioral: Working memory training<br>* The working memory training started the day after the pre-test and included 24 sessions of 25 minutes each. Participants trained, under supervision of an experimenter, on weekdays in the clinic. The training consisted of two tasks: the Symmetry Span and the N-back Task. Participants in the experimental group executed versions of these task that adapt to their working memory capacity, to train their working memory optimally.<br>|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo training<br> | Behavioral: Placebo training<br>* The working memory training started the day after the pre-test and included 24 sessions of 25 minutes each. Participants trained, under supervision of an experimenter, on weekdays in the clinic. The training consisted of two tasks: the Symmetry Span and the N-back Task. Participants in the placebo group executed easy versions of these task that did not adapt to their level, to prevent training.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Craving: Desires for Alcohol Questionnaire and Desires for Drug Questionnaire score change and Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale and Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale score change between pre and post training and follow up (two months after post) | The 14-item Desires for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ) and the 13-item Desires for Alcohol Questionnaire (DAQ) measure instant craving to respectively drug and alcohol. The DDQ is based on the DAQ. The Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS) and Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) measure the subjective interference and distress caused by respectively drug and alcohol related thoughts and compulsive-behavior patterns. | Pre (baseline), post (after 4 weeks of training-starting 1 day after pre-test) and follow-up (2 months after post-test) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Digit Span score on pre and post training and follow up after two months | The Digit Span task consists of two parts: the forward Digit Span is a frequently used measure for short term memory, an important subcomponent of the memory system (Shipstead, Redick, & Engle, 2012) and the backward version measures WM. | Pre (baseline), post (after 4 weeks of training-starting 1 day after pre-test) and follow-up (2 months after post-test) | 
| Change in Reading Span partial-scredit uni score on pre and post training and follow up after two months | The Reading Span measures the processing and storage functions of WM (Shipstead et al., 2012), specifically participants' ability to shift between two tasks and to cope with proactive interference. | Pre (baseline), post (after 4 weeks of training-starting 1 day after pre-test) and follow-up (2 months after post-test) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Substance abuse, Addiction, Working memory, Craving, Impulsivity, Attention control