Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Osseodensification on implant stability during the healing period The objective of this study is to compare between dental implant stability after osteotomy site preparation using osseodensification technique and conventional drilling technique immediately after implant installation (primary stability) , 6 week after the insertion of implant and 12 weeks later (secondary stability)

Official Title
-----------------
Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods: A Randomized Controlled Study

Conditions
-----------------
Dental Implant Stability

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: dental implant placement


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: medically fit patients ≥ 18 years of age including both genders alveolar ridges of sufficient vertical and horizontal dimensions bone density less than 850 Hounsfield units (HU) which corresponds to D3-D5 bone density according to Misch bone classification based on preoperative CBCT findings Exclusion Criteria: Patients with high bone density (more than 850 HU which corresponds to D1 and D2 according to Misch classification are not suitable for osseodensification. Patient with severe buccal plate undercut or concavity Active infection or inflammation in the implant zone Presence of any uncontrolled systemic diseases. Any patient need advance treatment such as sinus lifting and bone augmentation.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: condensation drilling technique<br>condensation of bone (osseodensefecation technique) | Other: dental implant placement<br>* dental implant placement by using a different drilling techniques<br>|
| Sham Comparator: conventional drilling technique<br>control group | Other: dental implant placement<br>* dental implant placement by using a different drilling techniques<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| primary stability | Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100 | 0 day (baseline) | 
| stability at the dip period | Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100 | 6 week post surgery | 
| secondary stability | Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100 | 12 week post surgery |