Treatment Comparison in Chronic Pain

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Chronic pain concernes one in four adults in Belgium. Because of the psychological and social repercussions, a biopsychosocial approach is necessary in order to improve the quality of life of people suffering from chronic pain. Non-pharmacological techniques such as hypnosis, self-care learning, music-therapy and psycho-education are gaining more and more interest in the scientific field. Indeed, several studies have shown a reduction in psychological distress and an improvement in global quality of life after having learned self-hypnosis/self-care. Furthermore, other studies focusing on music as a treatment for chronic pain highlight an analgesic effect of music over pain and a reduction of common comorbidities. Nevertheless, only few studies aim at comparing these techniques to each other. The aim of our study would be to compare a 7 months learning program of self-hypnosis/self-care, music-therapy/self-care, motivation to learn self-hypnosis/self-care and self-care alone in order to highlight the most efficient treatment for chronic pain.

Official Title
-----------------
Treatment Comparison in Chronic Pain : a Randomized Study

Conditions
-----------------
Comparison of Different Treatment for Chronic Pain

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Self-hypnosis/self-care
* Behavioral: Music/self-care
* Behavioral: Self-care
* Behavioral: Psycho-education


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Major Fluency in French Chronic pain diagnosis Exclusion Criteria: Neurologic disorder Psychiatric disorder Drug addiction Alcoholism

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Each patients will have a medical consultation and will have to fill-in questionnaires (T0). After, the care staff will have a multidisciplinary discussion and will randomize the participants to different treatment groups : self-hypnosis/self-care, music/self-care, self-care and psycho-education. Another group will be included but will not be randomized because it includes patients who demand to learn self-hypnosis/self-care (group named self-hypnosis/self-care motivation). After, participants will receive a 7 months (2 hours session a month) learning program of self-hypnosis/self-care animated by a therapist specialized in hypnosis or music/self-care (identical procedure but the hypnosis is replaced by music) or self-care or psycho-education at the end if which they will complete the same questionnaire (T2). A follow-up at 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months will also be conducted to account for any long term effect.
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Self-hypnosis/self-care group<br>It is a 7-months 2 hours-session (1 session per month) of self-hypnosis/self-care learning. Participants are given strategies to learn self-care (knowing their needs, self-respect, communication etc.), each strategy is discussed for participant to understand them and thus apply them correctly in daily life. An hypnosis exercice is conducted at the end of each session. A CD with the audiotaped hypnosis exercice is given to each patient so that they can practice also every day. | Behavioral: Self-hypnosis/self-care<br> <br> |
| Experimental: Music/self-care<br>It is a 7-months 2 hours-session (1 session per month) of music/self-care learning. Participants are given strategies to learn self-care (knowing their needs, self-respect, communication etc.), each strategy is discussed for participant to understand them and thus apply them correctly in daily life. At the end of each session, patients are invited to listen to a relaxing melody of 15 minutes. This melody was composed by a professional musico-therapist. A CD with the audiotaped melody is given to each patient so that they can practice also every day. | Behavioral: Music/self-care<br> <br> |
| Experimental: Self-care<br>It is a 7-months 2 hours-session (1 session per month) of self-care learning. Participants are given strategies to learn self-care (knowing their needs, self-respect, communication etc.), each strategy is discussed for participant to understand them and thus apply them correctly in daily life. | Behavioral: Self-care<br> <br> |
| Experimental: Psycho-education<br>It is a 7-months 2 hours-session (1 session per month) of psycho-education training. Psycho-education aims to empower and encourage the patient to become an actor in his therapeutic management, while offering a comprehensive model of the mechanisms of pain, the benefits of pharmacological treatments at a physical and psychological level as well as ways to change the way one lives every day. | Behavioral: Psycho-education<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in pain description | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on pain description will be assessed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up)) | 
| Change in sleep difficulties | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care upon the severity of insomnia will be assessed by means of the Insomnia Severity Index (Morin et al., 2001). Scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). | T0 (up to 5 month before inclusion), T1 (before the intervention), T2 (up to 8 months) | 
| Change in anxiety | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on anxiety will be assessed by means of the subtest anxiety of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in depression | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on depression will be assessed by means of the subtest anxiety of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in pain disability | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on pain disability will be assessed by means of the Pain Disability Index (PDI, Tait et al., 1990). Scale ranging from 0 (no difficulties) to 10 (a lot of difficulties). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in attitudes and beliefs about pain | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the attitudes and beliefs about pain will be assessed my means of the Survey of Pain Attitudes (SOPA, Jensen & Karoly, 1987). Scale ranging from 0 (totally wrong) to 10 (totally right). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in quality of life | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the quality of life will be assessed by means of the SF-36(Ware et al., 1988). Each item is balanced to obtain a score between 0 (worst quality) to 100 (maximum quality). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in locus of control | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the locus of control will be assessd my means og the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC, Wallston et al., 1978). Scale ranging from 1 (no agreement) to 4 (agreement). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change of the impact of pain | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the impact of pain in individual's life, quality of social support and general activity, will be assessed my means of the Multidimensional Pain Index (PDI, Kerns et al., 1985). Scale ranging from 0 (none) to 6 (a lot). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in generic health | The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on generic health will be assessed by the EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D, Health Policy, 1990). Scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 3 (extreme problems). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 
| Change in health status | The impact of Self-hypnosis/self-care on global health status will be assessed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scale ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status). | Day 0 (first meeting with the doctor), up to 7 months (right after the intervention), up to 13 months (6 months follow-up), up to 19 months (12 months follow-up) | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Chronic pain, Self-hypnosis, Self-care, Music-therapy, Psycho-education