Teledermatology Versus Usual Care on Delay Before Diagnosis and Treatment of Dermatologic Conditions

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
In France, there is usually a long delay (approximately 6 weeks) before a general practitioner can obtain a specialized advice by dermatologists for diagnosis of unusual dermatologic conditions of their patients. Previous studies have shown that teledermatology is a reliable way for diagnosis in dermatology. We hypothesize that a teledermatology advice could reduce delay before diagnosis and therefore treatment for patients.

Detailed Description
-----------------
In France, there is usually a long delay (approximately 6 weeks) before a general practitioner can obtain a specialized advice by dermatologists for diagnosis of unusual dermatologic conditions of their patients. Previous studies have shown that teledermatology is a reliable way for diagnosis in dermatology. We hypothesize that a teledermatology advice could reduce delay before diagnosis and therefore treatment for patients.

Official Title
-----------------
Impact of Teledermatology Versus Usual Care on Delay Before Diagnosis and/or Treatment of Dermatologic Conditions in General Practice

Conditions
-----------------
Dermatologic Conditions

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Teledermatology


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Consultation with a general practitioner for any motive during which, the general practitioner deems necessary to obtain a dermatologic expertise for a skin lesion (for diagnosis or treatment) Exclusion Criteria: Emergency, assessed by the general practitioner (needs care or quick telephonic advice in the next 24 hours) Patients for which diagnosis and/or treatment are known by the general practitioner (the GP needs a dermatologic advice for a specific treatment (for example= laser, instrumental treatment...)) Patient cannot go the dermatologic consultation by himself (for example: dependant patients...) Cognitive or psychiatric impairment (cannot give informed consent)

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Teledermatology<br>General practitioner takes 3 photographs per dermatologic lesion using either a telephone with a 3Mega Pixel minimum camera or a standard camera following recommendations of the practice guidelines for teledermatology (2007) of the American Telemedicine Association and sends them to the dermatologist using a secured email server. Dermatologist answer is standardized. | Other: Teledermatology<br>* General practitioner takes 3 photographs per dermatologic lesion using either a telephone with a 3Mega Pixel minimum camera or a standard camera following recommendations of the practice guidelines for teledermatology (2007) of the American Telemedicine Association. Photographs are sent by email using a secured mail server with at least the following information=date of symptoms, symptomatology, topography of lesions, description of lesions, extension, recent drug intakes) Photographs are read and analyzed by a single dermatologist who gives an expert answer (diagnosis and/or treatment). Answer is sent back to the general practitioner by email (using a secured mail server). Answer contains at least the following information= are photographs usable? What is the diagnosis? If necessary, which treatment should the general practitioner begin ? If necessary, does the patient need a consultation with a dermatologist ?<br>|
| No Intervention: Usual care<br>Usual care for dermatologic conditions requiring an expertise from a dermatologist involves the general practitioner 1) giving the patient a paper letter containing at least the following information: date of symptoms, symptomatology, topography of lesions, description of lesions, extension, recent drug intakes) and 2) telling him to see the dermatologist of his choice (patient manages his appointments alone). | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Delay before expertise by a dermatologist | Delay, in days, between a patient's consultation with his general practitioner and expertise by a dermatologist (teledermatology or classic consultation) that allows either diagnostic and/or initiation of treatment. For example: in the teledermatology group, if the specialist needs to see the patient because the photographs cannot be analyzed correctly, date of expertise is the date of the consultation with the dermatologist. Data is censured after 3 months. | 3 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Patient's satisfaction | An investigator will call patients by telephone and assess their satisfaction with their care for the dermatologic condition using a simple rating scale with 4 items ranging from Not satisfied (1) to very satisfied (4). | 1 month after expertise by dermatologist | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
teledermatology, dermatology, general practice, organization of care