linjc16/ctgov huggingface dataset:
Health-related QoF Between OAB-wet and OAB-dry Women

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) has a great negative impact on health-related quality of life. In literatures, few studies reported the comparisons of health related quality of life between OAB-wet and OAB-dry female patients. Thus, our aim is to compare the clinical variables and health-related quality of life between OAB-wet and OAB-dry women.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Between July 2009 and January 2018, all women with OAB visiting a medical center for evaluation were reviewed. The classification of OAB-wet or OAB-dry is based on the record of the three-day bladder diary of each patient. The diagnosis of OAB in each patient was based on the presence of at least one episode of urgency in her three-day bladder diary and with the absence of stress urinary incontinence. The presence of at least one episode of urgency associated incontinence was defined to be OAB-wet, otherwise, OAB-dry. Besides, only female OAB patients with available King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) data were reviewed in this study.

Official Title
-----------------
Comparisons of Health-Related Quality of Life Between Overactive Bladder-wet and -Dry Women Based on Bladder Diary

Conditions
-----------------
Quality of Life

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Diagnostic Test: Bladder diary


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: More than 20-year-old Female Diagnosed with overactive bladder by bladder diary Exclusion Criteria: Younger than 20-year-old Pregnant or planned to be pregnant

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 20 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| OAB-wet<br>The diagnosis of OAB in each patient was based on the presence of at least one episode of urgency in her three-day bladder diary and with the absence of stress urinary incontinence. The presence of at least one episode of urgency associated incontinence was defined to be OAB-wet. | Diagnostic Test: Bladder diary<br>* 3-day bladder diary<br>|
| OAB-dry<br>The diagnosis of OAB in each patient was based on the presence of at least one episode of urgency in her three-day bladder diary and with the absence of stress urinary incontinence. The absence of urgency associated incontinence was defined to be OAB-dry. | Diagnostic Test: Bladder diary<br>* 3-day bladder diary<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Difference in Quality of life | Use questionnaire to evaluate the difference in QoF of OAB-wet and OAB-dry women | Between July 2009 and January 2018 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Health Related Quality of Life, Overactive Bladder, Bladder Diary
Stylet Angle for McGrath Videolaryngoscopy

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL) provides excellent laryngoscopic views, but directing an endotracheal tube is not easy, so routine using of stylet is recommended. The goal of this study is to determine the appropriate angle of stylet by comparing time to intubation (TTI).

Conditions
-----------------
Intubation

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: intubate with 60° angled stylet
* Device: intubate with 60° angled stylet


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) 1 or 2 Exclusion Criteria: a suspected difficult airway (Mallampati score Ⅳ) known cervical spine injury required rapid sequence induction emergency operation

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 19 Years
Maximum Age: 70 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| 60° angle group<br>intubate using McGrath Videolaryngoscope with 60° angled stylet | Device: intubate with 60° angled stylet<br> <br> |
| 90°angle group<br>intubate using McGrath Videolaryngoscope with 90° angled stylet | Device: intubate with 60° angled stylet<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Time to Intubation |  | 10 minutes around intubation |
Intensive Meditation and Migraines: Effects on Health and Well Being

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Participants completing training in intensive meditation and continuing frequent practice for one year would experience reduced frequency, duration and severity of headaches along with improved awareness of the triggers of their symptoms, improved quality of life and mental health, improved heart rate variability, and reduced inflammation.

Official Title
-----------------
Intensive Meditation and Migraines: Effects on Health and Well Being

Conditions
-----------------
Chronic Daily Headache

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Vipassana Meditation


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Chronic Daily Headache, defined as a headache at least 15 days of the month, of which at least 8 are migraines. Exclusion Criteria:1. Severe depression, anxiety, panic attacks, psychosis or dementia that may interfere with ability to participate in a 10 day course Active alcoholism on screening or use of illicit drugs within the last 3 months Already completed a 10 day course Actively involved in another form of meditation over the past 6 months Women who are pregnant, planning pregnancy during trial period, or lactating.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 75 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: 1<br>Structured Intervention Group | Behavioral: Vipassana Meditation<br>* 12 day retreat where participants learn to meditate<br>|
| Active Comparator: 2.Comparison group<br>Unstructured comparison group | Behavioral: Vipassana Meditation<br>* 12 day retreat where participants learn to meditate<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| number of migraine days, number of headache days |  | 3,6,12 months | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| severity of headaches |  | 3,6,12 months | 
| quality of life |  | 3,6,12 months | 
| Heart Rate Variability |  | 3,6,12 months | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Migraine, Headache, Vipassana, Meditation, Intensive
Carbamazepine Treatment of Cocaine Dependence - 1

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of carbamazepine in treatment of cocaine-dependence in patients with affective disorders.

Official Title
-----------------
Carbamazepine Treatment of Cocaine Dependence

Conditions
-----------------
Substance-Related Disorders, Cocaine-Related Disorders

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: Carbamazepine


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Please contact site for information.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Drug: Carbamazepine|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Severity addiction |  |  | 
| Amount of drug use |  |  | 
| Affective stability |  |  | 
| Medication compliance |  |  | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Cocaine, Substance Abuse
Safety and Efficacy Trial of the Use of Quetiapine Fumarate (SEROQUEL®) in the Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Depression

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in the treatment of a major depressive episode in patients with bipolar disorder.

Conditions
-----------------
Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Bipolar

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Drug: SEROQUEL (quetiapine fumarate) Tablets


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Written Informed Consent; Bipolar disorder with most recent episode depressed; Outpatient status Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a current Axis I disorder other than bipolar disorder within 6 months of screening; Patients whose current episode of depression exceeds 12 months or is less than 4 weeks

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 65 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Drug: SEROQUEL (quetiapine fumarate) Tablets|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Bipolar Depression
Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 Years

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
For endotracheal entubation in children mostly Miller and Macintosh blades have been used. On the other hand Truview EVO2 laringoscopes can maintain a better laryngeal view without having a direct sight of the airway and without having to align oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. The aim of this study is to compare the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of intubation difficulty score, time to intubation and intubation quality score.

Conditions
-----------------
All the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Macintosh laryngoscope
* Procedure: Truview EVO2 laryngoscope


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: aged 2-12 pediatric patients Exclusion Criteria: any allergy difficult airway history

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 2 Years
Maximum Age: 12 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Truview EVO2 laryngoscope<br>patients intubated withTruview EVO2 laryngoscope | Procedure: Truview EVO2 laryngoscope<br>* intubation criterias with Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in pediatric patients<br>|
| Macintosh laryngoscope<br>patients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope | Procedure: Macintosh laryngoscope<br>* intubation criterias withMacintosh laryngoscopein pediatric patients<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ease laryngoscopy in children |  | during laryngoscopy |
Effect of Pterygium Excision on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation for Subsequent Cataract Operation

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Pterygium is known to induce with-the-rule astigmatism. Excision of pterygium will steepen the cornea and reduce corneal astigmatism. We postulate that the alteration of keratometry reading will indirectly affect the IOL power calculation in cases with concurrent pterygium and cataract. Concurrent pterygium and cataract is common in Hong Kong and other tropical regions. The effect of pterygium excision on intraocular lens power calculation is investigated.

Official Title
-----------------
Effect of Pterygium Excision on IOL Power Calculation: Concurrent Cataract and Pterygium

Conditions
-----------------
Pterygium, Cataract, Astigmatism

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: pterygium excision


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: All cases with concomitant cataract and primary pterygium, which are indicated for surgery. Exclusion Criteria: Pterygium smaller than 1mm, which is not visually significant. Double headed pterygium Pterygium obscuring visual axis that preclude keratometry or autorefraction measurements. Previous corneal refractive surgery that alter the keratometric power of the cornea. Patients with medical problems that preclude staged ocular surgery, e.g. dementia, heart disease, on warfarin.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Intervention/Treatment |
| --- |
|Procedure: pterygium excision|nan|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| IOL power |  | 1 and 3 months post pterygium excision | 
| Astigmatism |  | 1 and 3 months post pterygium excision | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Pterygium, Cataract, Astigmatism
A Clinical Cohort Study of Pneumonia in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
From 2003 when Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromes (SARS) appeared，many new types of respiratory viruses emerge in endlessly. Therefore, the epidemiology and the clinical character has changed quietly, especially severe pneumonia. This cohort study aim to obtain the contents of severe pneumonia patients in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU). Through the clinical data analysis, the investigators could get the information of the pneumonia caused by different reasons, such as morbidity and mortality, risk factors, clinical symptoms and radiographic changes, the respiratory support parameter and so on. The investigators hope the result could guide them do the clinical work of severe pneumonia better in the future.

Official Title
-----------------
A Clinical Cohort Study of Pneumonia in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit

Conditions
-----------------
Pneumonia

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: pneumonia


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: admit in RICU because of pneumonia of any causes anticipated length of hospital stay more than 72h Exclusion Criteria: admit in RICU because of other causes except pneumonia do not agree to join this study admit in RICU for the second time anticipated length of hospital stay less than 72h

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| pneumonia in RICU<br>The patients admit in RICU because of pneumonia. | Other: pneumonia<br> <br> |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| the mortality caused by any reasons in RICU |  | one years | 
| the morbidity caused by any reasons in RICU |  | one years | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| the treatment options of pneumonia caused by any reasons in RICU | the investigators obtain the treatment commons, such as the kind of antibiotics, the dosage of glucocorticoids, etc. | 3 weeks | 
| the symptoms description of pneumonia caused by any reasons in RICU | all the symptoms caused by pneumonia, such as fever, cough, dyspnea, sputum and so on. The investigators could get the incidence of each of these symptoms. | the first 48hours after admitted in RICU | 
| the respiratory support of pneumonia caused by any reasons in RICU | summarize the respiratory support parameters while the patients hospitalized in RICU. For example, the ventilation parameter and mode, Whether the mechanical ventilation complications occurred, and so on. | the first 5 days after admitted in RICU |
Evaluating the Implementation of Portfolio Assessment in Resident Training Program

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Portfolios are the records of learning process, providing evidences of experiential learning. It can be a valuable tool not only for understanding the learning process but also for evaluating the accomplishment. Portfolios promote learners to reflecting, thinking, improving in learning as well as achieving learning goals. It has been widely applied in medical education. The goals of resident training outcomes in Wan-Fang Hospital are the ACGME six core competences. The Wan-Fang hospital, one of Taipei Medical University affiliated hospitals and the first implementing portfolio assessment teaching hospitals in Taiwan, will conduct portfolio assessment to assess residents competences. Facilitating residents bring reflective learning into practice, personal and professional growth and demonstrating the outcomes of training program. This study describes initiating and implementing portfolio assessment procedures. Qualitative and quantitative research methods are applied for evaluating the portfolio assessment process and the data of validity and reliability. Qualitative data collection methods of interview, focus groups and meetings will be used understanding the experiences and viewpoints of residents, mentors and assessors. Then quantitative data collection method of questionnaire will be subsequently used. The results of this study will provide experiences and suggestions for the implementation of portfolio assessment system in medical education.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluating the Implementation of Portfolio Assessment in Resident Training Program

Conditions
-----------------
Residents' Perceptions on Portfolio Use in Clinical Training

Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: residents in Wanfang Hospital willing to be enrolled to this study Exclusion Criteria: none
Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------
What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Medical Education, Resident Training, Portfolio
Mini-C-Arm for Distal Radius Fractures in Adults

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Determine efficacy of the use of mini-c-arm fluoroscopy for the closed reduction of isolated distal radius fractures in adult patients in the emergency department setting.

Official Title
-----------------
The Efficacy of Mini-c-arm Fluoroscopy for the Closed Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults

Conditions
-----------------
Distal Radius Fracture

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Mini-c-arm


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Closed distal radius fracture requiring reduction Exclusion Criteria: Open, other ipsilateral upper extremity fractures, pregnant, incarcerated, less than 18 yo

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Patients randomized to fluoroscopically-aided reduction of fracture, versus no fluoroscopic guidance
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Mini-c-arm<br>Fluoroscopically aided reductions | Other: Mini-c-arm<br>* Fluoroscopy used to aid reduction of distal radius fracture<br>|
| No Intervention: Standard<br> | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reduction quality | Fracture alignment measured on post-reduction radiographs | Immediately post reduction |