Deep Brain Stimulation and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a relatively common psychiatric condition, which is classically treated by antidepressant medications in combination with psychotherapies. However, both these conventional therapeutic approaches fail to sufficiently improve obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 20-30% of cases. From these considerations, deep brain stimulation (DBS), as a reversible and adjustable surgical procedure, has recently been introduced in the field of resistant OCD. DBS currently uses electrodes with four contacts on each lead, which are bilaterally implanted into the chosen brain structure. DBS consists of the delivery of a high-frequency current through the quadripolar electrodes connected to a battery powered pulse-generating device. Several clinical investigations have shown that DBS, primarily targeting either the ventral striatum (VS) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN), as brain sites of interest because of their particular involvement in the production of OCD symptoms, is able to produce an approximately 40% or greater reduction in clinical symptom intensity in severely chronic and incapacitating forms of OCD. These promising findings lead to propose a comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DBS choosing either the VS or STN as brain target by conducting a large controlled trial and including a medico-economic analysis for assessing the classical cost/efficacy ratio. In this way, the present study is expected to promote and highlight the importance of DBS, as an effective, safe, well-tolerated and cost-relevant surgical approach for the management of resistant OCD.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a relatively common psychiatric condition with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 2-3 % of the general population. It is generally characterized by a chronic course leading to a profound impairment in psychosocial functioning and to a marked deterioration in quality of life. Today, the well-established efficacy of antidepressants, acting preferentially by blocking serotonin reuptake, in addition to psychological treatments, have considerably changed the poor prognosis of the illness. However, both conventional therapeutic approaches failed to substantially alleviate obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 20-30% of cases. Deep brain stimulation, as a reversible and adjustable surgical procedure, has recently been introduced in the field of OCD, primarily targeting either the ventral striatum (VS) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and leading to an approximately 40% or greater reduction in clinical symptom intensity from baseline levels in severely chronic and resistant forms of OCD. These promising findings lead to propose a comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DBS choosing either the VS or STN as brain target by conducting a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, single-blind trial over a 13-month follow-up period. For this purpose, a total population of 28 OCD patients who meet the currently used operational criteria for defining therapeutic resistance will be recruited. The surgical procedure will consist in the implantation of stimulation electrodes with four contacts on each lead, which are stereotactically and bilaterally implanted into the targeted brain structure under local anesthesia. Per-operative, single-unit electrophysiological recordings of the neuronal activity will be performed using five parallel microelectrodes and serving as guide for the implantation of both definitive electrodes. They will be connected to a battery powered pulse-generating device five days later under general anesthesia. Thereafter, psychiatric assessments including both the Y-BOCS (Yale-Brow Obsessive-compulsive scale) and PI (Padua Inventory) for measuring OCD symptom severity, the BAS (Brief Anxiety Scale), MADRS (Montgomery and Asberg Depression rating Scale) and HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) for determining anxiety and/or depressive symptom intensity, and the CGI (Clinical Global Impression) rating scales for evaluating global symptom severity and treatment response will be performed every 3 months beyond the one-month postoperative free-stimulation period. This will be coupled with a large battery of neuropsychological tests exploring all executive functions in combination with precise medical records of side effects for appreciating safety/tolerability of DBS. A cost-effectiveness analysis, as a formal method of comparing DBS and classical therapeutic strategies with regard to their respective resource utilization (costs) and outcomes (effectiveness) will also be carried out. Therefore, the present study may contribute to highlight the special interest of DBS, as an effective, safe, well-tolerated and cost-relevant surgical approach for the management of resistant OCD.

Official Title
-----------------
Treatment of Severe and Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder by High-frequency Stimulation of the Ventral Striatum and the Subthalamic Nucleus

Conditions
-----------------
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age comprised between 18 and 60 years History of OCD for at least 5 years according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria and characterized by a good insight, as determined by the BABS (Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale) Severe form of OCD, as evidenced by: a score ≥ 25 on the Y-BOCS a score > 4 on the CGI scale a score =< 40 on the GAF (global assessment of functioning) Lack of therapeutic effects of at least 3 antidepressants selectively blocking serotonin reuptake (SSRI) at least 12 consecutive weeks at the maximal tolerated dose (up to 80 mg/day for fluoxetine, 300 mg/day for fluvoxamine, 200 mg/day for sertraline, 60 mg/day for paroxetine, 60mg/day for citalopram and 250 mg/day for clomipramine) prescribed alone and in combination for at least 1 month with: 1) risperidone or olanzapine or aripiprazole or quetiapine, 2) clomipramine Lack of therapeutic effects of behavioral therapy with two different therapists using conventional techniques primarily based on exposure with prevention of ritualized response Understand and accept the design and constraints of the present study Be a beneficiary or member of health insurance plan Provide written consent to the study after receiving clear information Exclusion Criteria: Patient with cognitive impairment with a Mattis scale score ≤ 130 Patient with other DSM-IV-TR axis I diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar, substance abuse or substance dependence), except for generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia or nicotine dependence Patient with high suicide risk, as indicated by a score ≥ 2 on the MADRS (item 10) Patient with personality disorder corresponding to the clusters A and B, as assessed with the SIDP-IV (Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality) Patient with contraindication for MRI scanning, abnormal brain MRI or serious intercurrent disease Patient with contraindication for surgery or anesthesia Patient currently treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug Be a woman of childbearing age without effective contraception Be hospitalized under constraint Be under guardianship procedures Prohibition on participation in other research, apart from any other non-interventional research

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 60 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: DBS of subthalamic nucleus<br> | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)<br>* In a first time: Implantation of DBS electrodes, stereotactically, in each hemisphere into the targeted brain structure under local anesthesia. In a second time (next week): installation of the deep brain neurostimulator and connection to the electrodes implanted under general anesthesia. And one month later: beginning of the stimulation.<br>|
| Active Comparator: DBS of ventral striatum<br> | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)<br>* In a first time: Implantation of DBS electrodes, stereotactically, in each hemisphere into the targeted brain structure under local anesthesia. In a second time (next week): installation of the deep brain neurostimulator and connection to the electrodes implanted under general anesthesia. And one month later: beginning of the stimulation.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Combination of three criteria (composite criterion), as follows: a. Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 / and b. Technical feasibility (each leads in the target) / and c. Safety, as assessed by any serial adverse event |  | Month 13 : one year after stimulation | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Remission as defined by a Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 at M13 |  | Month 13 : one year after stimulation | 
| Number of electrode contacts correctly located within the chosen brain target (0, 1 or 2) |  | End of surgical procedure (day 1) | 
| Monitoring of psychological and somatic complaints made spontaneously by the patient over the course of the present trial, in combination to the semi-structured interview for collecting side effects |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Scores on neuropsychological tests exploring all executive functions |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Percentage change in the total Y-BOCS score from M1 to M13 |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Therapeutic response, as indicated by a 35% decrease or more in the Y-BOCS score and a score of 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) on the CGI improvement scale from M1 to M13 |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Percentage change in the Y-BOCS obsessive and compulsive subscores from M1 to M13 |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Percentage change in the overall Padua Inventory score, MADRS score, BAS score from M1 to M13 |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Percentage change in the total and depression and anxiety subscale scores on the HAD scale from M1 and M13 |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Ratings of functional disability and quality of life |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| Correlations between efficacy and anatomical positioning of both stimulation electrodes within the chosen brain target |  | Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13 | 
| cost comparison of therapeutic strategies | cost comparison of thérapeutic strategies : classical versus surgical | M-13 and M13 (one year after stimultaion) | 
| Cost / effectiveness ration | Cost / effectiveness ratio : cost difference between therapeutic strategies and success rate of DBS | M-13/ M13 (one year after stimulation) | 
| Cost-utility rati | Cost-utility ratio based on SF-36 scores. | every 3 months from month 1 to month 13 | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), Obsessive compulsive disorder, ventral striatum, subthalamic nucleus