Feasibility of an Early Detection Program for Early Psychosis on a College Campus

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The objective of the proposed study is to determine the feasibility of an Early Detection program that aims to: (i) identify college students at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis or with first episode psychosis (FEP), and (ii) efficiently link them to coordinated specialty care (CSC) services for a 2nd stage screen, a clinical assessment, and appropriate treatment. Preliminary estimates of effectiveness with respect to the intervention will also be provided.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Specific Aims: Feasibility of an Early Detection Program for Early Psychosis on a College Campus Long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is associated with poor outcomes, including higher rates of suicide, hospitalization, and overall low functioning. More widespread use of effective strategies to decrease DUP are needed to address the substantial discrepancy between the actual (i.e., on average 2 years) and recommended time (i.e., 3 months) between the appearance of psychotic symptoms and the initiation of treatment. Early detection (ED) programs aim to decrease DUP by increasing case identification and removal of barriers to coordinated specialty care (CSC). The most studied components of ED programs include: (i) educational campaigns; ED response teams designed to optimize the referral processes to CSC; and to a lesser extent, screening among high-risk groups. While results of studies on individual ED components have been inconsistent, combinations of ED components have had more success in reducing DUP. For example, the Treatment and Intervention in Psychosis ED program, which included educational campaigns and ED teams, reported an average decrease in DUP from 1.5 years to 0.5 years pre-post implementation. The evidence on community-based ED programs is large and growing but very little is known about the effectiveness of ED services on college campuses in the United States. This gap in the literature is problematic because, with the first symptoms of psychosis being most likely to surface among college age young adults, college campuses are critical locations to identify and refer individuals to CSC who are at increased risk of first episode psychosis (FEP). The investigators aim to address this gap in the literature. The long-term goal of this program of research is to improve clinical and functional outcomes among college students with early stages of psychosis by reducing DUP. The objective of the proposed study is to determine the feasibility of an ED program that aims to: (i) identify college students at CHR of psychosis or with FEP, and (ii) efficiently link them to CSC services for a 2nd stage screen and a clinical assessment among those determined eligible. Students will be referred to treatment based on the results of the assessment (the University of New Mexico Department of Psychiatry CSC program includes clinical services for both FEP and CHR). The investigators will also provide preliminary estimates of effectiveness with respect to the intervention. The ED program will include two organizational level changes. First, a universal screening will be implemented (i.e., the Prodromal Questionnaire Brief) for psychosis among college students who are seeking help at a college counseling center. Second, a collaborative, person-centered, and rapid referral process (<2 weeks) to CSC will be implemented. Person-centered elements of the referral process include shared-decision making and a warm handoff (i.e., transfer of care between the college counseling center and CSC with the student present). The organizational-level changes will be facilitated by training, monthly meetings, and a decision support tool. The focus on these two components was informed by: (i) input collected from the existing CSC clinical team, college counseling center staff, and students through campus-based meetings; (ii) evidence for universal screening and processes that facilitate rapid access to CSC; and (iii) the pathways to care literature showing a strong link between health system factors and extended DUP. The planned intervention will evaluate it based on a combination of two theoretical frameworks: (i) Precede-Proceed Public Health Model, and the (ii) RE-AIM. Mixed methods will be used to attain the objective and achieve the following two specific aims: Identify whether (i) case identification, and (ii) referral-related barriers to CSC are important targets for ED programs on college campuses. The number of referrals from the college counseling center to the CSC program in the preceding three years will be compared to the number received during the 2.5 years of implementation. Also, during the same time-period DUP will be compared, and pathways and perceived barriers to care between college students referred from the college counseling center and students presenting to CSC from other referral sources. The hypothesis is that through the two mechanisms of change, the number of college students referred to CSC will increase. The investigators also hypothesize that, among college students referred to CSC from the college counseling center compared to those presenting from other referral sources, DUP will be shorter among those with FEP, and there will be fewer steps and perceived barriers for students with FEP or at CHR. The psychosis literacy among referrers from the counseling center will be examined. The investigators hypothesize that psychosis literacy will increase pre-post implementation. Evaluate the feasibility of an ED program from the perspectives of various stakeholders. The proposed study is innovative because it will be pilot testing an ED program on a college campus. At the completion of the proposed research, the expected outcomes are preliminary data and knowledge on the feasibility of and effective targets for an ED program on a college campus. If determined feasible and effective, the proposed ED program has a high potential for widespread uptake and scale-up given the nominal costs and ease of replication of its components. The brief screener will be part of the routine intake and the warm handoff/rapid CSC access will be facilitated by CSC staff posing minimal burden on college counseling centers. With a diverse target population in terms of ethnicity and race, the findings will be generalizable to college campuses nationwide and may therefore ultimately impact DUP - a major public health problem.

Official Title
-----------------
Feasibility of an Early Detection Program for Early Psychosis on a College Campus

Conditions
-----------------
Psychosis, First Episode Psychosis, Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Screening
* Other: Warm Hand-Off


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: 15-30 year-old college students who present to the University of New Mexico (UNM) Early Program or the UNM CONNECT program for an intake, screen positive for clinical high risk on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) or first episode psychosis on the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV agree to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: below the age of 15 years old or above the age of 30, not UNM college students, screen negative for clinical high risk or first episode psychosis, refuse to participate in the study, cognitively unable to provide informed consent as demonstrated by a brief cognitive screen prior to completion of the enrollment interview

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 15 Years
Maximum Age: 30 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Screening
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Interventional Model Description: A staggered intervention design will be implemented with three distinct stages. 1. Treatment as usual enhanced with a brief psychosis literacy training (45-60 minutes) for counselors at a university's student health counseling center (SHAC); 2. implementation of a screening tool for risk of psychosis; 3. Addition of a warm hand-off to Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC)
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| No Intervention: Treatment as Usual<br>Treatment as usual enhanced with a brief psychosis literacy training (45-60 minutes) for the counselors at the university's student health and counseling center | |
| Other: Screening<br>Implementation of the Prodromal Questionnaire - Brief, which is a screening tool to detect risk of psychosis. | Other: Screening<br>* Screening for Early Psychosis and Clinical High Risk of Psychosis<br>|
| Other: Screening Plus Warm Hand-Off<br>Addition of a warm hand-off to coordinated specialty care (CSC) for those determined eligible on the screening tool. | Other: Screening<br>* Screening for Early Psychosis and Clinical High Risk of Psychosis<br>Other: Warm Hand-Off<br>* Among those determined eligible, transfer of care between the student health and counseling center and the coordinated specialty care program outreach coordinator occurring over the phone while the student is in the counselor's office immediately following the results of the screening.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) | Measured among those who meet criteria for first episode psychosis using the Circumstances of Onset and Relapse Schedule. | Measured at 1 day ( one time point only, which is upon admission to coordinated specialty care (CSC) and is operationalized as the onset of symptoms and admission to CSC for first episode psychosis.) | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of steps to coordinated specialty care | Measured among those who meet criteria for first episode psychosis or clinical high risk using the Circumstances of Onset and Relapse Schedule. | Measured at 1 day (one time point only, which is upon admission to coordinated specialty care (CSC) and is operationalized as the number of steps between the onset of symptoms and admission to CSC for first episode psychosis or clinic high risk.) | 
| Perceived barriers to seeking psychological help | Measured among those who meet criteria for first episode psychosis or clinical high risk by the Barriers to Seeking Psychological Help Scale (BSPHS). The self-report scale includes 17 items rated on a five point scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Responses corresponding to 5 subscales are summed and range from either 4 to 20 or 3 to 15 with higher scores indicative of higher perceived obstacles. The five subscales include: (1) fear of being stigmatized by society, (2) trust in the mental health professional, (3) difficulties in self-disclosure, (4) perceived devaluation, and, (5) lack of knowledge. See citation for further scoring information for subscales. | Measured at 1 day (one time point only, which is upon admission to coordinated specialty care (CSC).) |