Decision Support for Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
While data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) estimate that 36.9% of patients with diabetes have CKD, only approximately 10% of patients are aware of their kidney disease. In its 2020 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, the ADA recommends that all patients with type II diabetes (T2DM) undergo annual measurement of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) has also proposed an update to the requirements for assessment of adults with diabetes including both an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and uACR. The goal of accurately identifying patients with T2DM and CKD is to help providers intervene at an earlier stage of kidney impairment, improve renal outcomes, and reduce associated healthcare costs. Failure to adopt these guideline recommendations has widespread implications, including underestimation of the burden of CKD in the T2DM population, delays in diagnosis of renal impairment, and ultimately, underutilization of therapies that could improve clinical outcomes. This single-center, 400-patient, randomized controlled trial will assess the impact of an EPIC Best Practice Advisory (BPA; alert-based CDS tool) on guideline-directed assessment for CKD using UACR in patients with T2DM who have not had a UACR in the past year.

Detailed Description
-----------------
The study is a 400-patient single-center Quality Improvement Initiative in the form of a randomized controlled trial of an EPIC EHR BPA. The allocation ratio will be 1:1 for an EPIC BPA versus no notification with randomization by Attending Physician of Record, using odd or even provider ID number, to minimize cluster-effect. While the study will randomize patients by Attending Physician of Record, the observational unit will be the patient. The study will use a BPA within EPIC that will integrate with the EHR medical history, visit diagnoses, and problem list to identify outpatients with a diagnosis of T2DM and without an established diagnosis of CKD. The BPA will then search the laboratory results section of the EHR for a UACR result within the last year. If the patient with T2DM has not had a UACR result within the past year, he or she will be randomly assigned to the BPA intervention group (alert group) or the control (no alert) group according the Attending Physician of Record's provider ID number. For patients randomly assigned to the BPA intervention group (alert group), an on-screen electronic alert will be issued during the outpatient clinical encounter that notifies the responsible provider that his or her T2DM patient should be evaluated for CKD with UACR. The provider then will be given on-screen options to either order a UACR or follow a link to learn more about CKD assessment in T2DM.

Official Title
-----------------
Electronic Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support to Increase Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus (CKD-DETECT)

Conditions
-----------------
Chronic Kidney Diseases, Type2Diabetes

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Other: Alert-based computerized decision support


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: BWH outpatients at least 18 years of age who are evaluated in Primary Care or Brigham Medical Specialties Clinics (Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, and Diabetology) AND have a diagnosis of T2DM AND have not had a UACR measured in the past year Exclusion Criteria: have an established diagnosis of CKD (medical history, problem list, or visit diagnosis entry in the EHR) OR who are undergoing renal replacement therapy (either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) as UACR will be unlikely to result in diagnosis change or therapeutic intervention OR who have undergone renal transplantation

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: 1:1 allocation ratio, randomized controlled trial
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Alert<br>For patients randomly assigned to the BPA intervention group (alert group), an on-screen electronic alert will be issued during the outpatient clinical encounter that notifies the responsible provider that his or her T2DM patient should be evaluated for CKD with UACR assessment. The provider then will be given on-screen options to either order a UACR assessment or follow a link to learn more about CKD assessment in T2DM. Should the alert-recipient elect to omit an order for UACR assessment and decline to follow a link to learn more about CKD assessment in T2DM, the provider will be able to continue on with clinic visit-related EHR documentation but will need to select an acknowledge reason (rationale) for not following the evidence-based clinical practice recommendation highlighted in the alert. | Other: Alert-based computerized decision support<br>* For patients randomly assigned to the BPA intervention group (alert group), an on-screen electronic alert will be issued during the outpatient clinical encounter that notifies the responsible provider that his or her T2DM patient should be evaluated for CKD with UACR assessment. The provider then will be given on-screen options to either order a UACR assessment or follow a link to learn more about CKD assessment in T2DM. Should the alert-recipient elect to omit an order for UACR assessment and decline to follow a link to learn more about CKD assessment in T2DM, the provider will be able to continue on with clinic visit-related EHR documentation but will need to select an acknowledge reason (rationale) for not following the evidence-based clinical practice recommendation highlighted in the alert.<br>* Other names: EPIC Best Practice Advisory;|
| No Intervention: No Alert<br>Providers in the No Alert group will not receive any on-screen notification | |

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Frequency of UACR testing order for CKD in patients with T2DM who have not had such testing within the past year | Review the order entry section of the Electronic Health Record (EPIC) to make this determination | 90 days | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Frequency of new clinical diagnosis of CKD in patients with T2DM who have not had UACR assessment within the past year | Review the medical history and problem list sections of the Electronic Health Record (EPIC) to make this determination | 90 days | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
chronic kidney disease, diabetes, urine albumin to creatinine ratio