Intense Pulsed Light in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a major cause of dry eye disease (DED). Up to 86% of patients suffering from DED also show signs of MGD. Traditional treatment of MGD is based on eye lid hygiene and massage in combination with intensive usage of lubricants. Recently, a novel technology the intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy was introduced, which shows promising results in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Originating from field of dermatology, subjecting improvement of dry eye symptoms was recognized after the treatment of facial rosacea using IPL. Different hypotheses exist how IPL treatment might improve the situation in the dry eye patient. Warming of the eyelid, due to the light application and reduction of bacterial load are two possible mode of actions. Further, the used wavelengths in IPL may be modified that the light is only absorbed by oxygenated haemoglobin, which lead to an obliteration of telangiectasia and reduced inflammation on the lid margin. This principal is applied in the treatment of facial rosacea. Aim of this study is to investigate the effect of IPL therapy in patients with MGD on dry eye parameters as well as subjective complaints.

Official Title
-----------------
Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment in Patients With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Conditions
-----------------
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Device: Intense Pulsed Light therapy
* Device: Sham Treatment


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age older than 18 years Presence of meibomian gland dysfunction at any stage Presence of meibomian glands on each lower eyelid's Meibography Exclusion Criteria: Fitzpatrick Skin Type VI Usage of eye drops other than lubricants (e.g. antibiotics, steroids, cyclosporin-A) Usage of systemic antibiotic therapy Any pathology of the ocular surface except dry eye disease (e.g. corneal scarring, cornea ectasia) Ocular surgery within prior 3 months Ocular injury within prior 3 months Ocular herpes of eye or eyelid within prior 3 months Active ocular infection Active ocular inflammation or history of chronic, recurrent ocular inflammation within prior 3 months Eyelid abnormalities that affect lid function Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity Pregnancy

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Interventional Model Description: Bilateral comparison
Masking: Double


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Active Comparator: Study eyes<br>Study eye receives the standard energy dose as recommended by the manufacturer (between 8 and 12J/cm2, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations). | Device: Intense Pulsed Light therapy<br>* The LacryStim System is a CE marked device for treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. It stimulates and reactivates meibomian glands and improves the related dry eye condition. Intense pulsed light is emitted with a light spectrum from 610nm to 1200nm. Each treatment consists of short individual pulses lasting for 4ms separated by a 26ms lasting interval to hinder tissue temperature increase, thermal damage to the skin and inflammatory reaction. During this phase 8 to 12 J / cm2 are delivered. Selection of total energy levels depends on the skin type (Fitzpatrick Skin Types) as recommended by the manufacturer.<br>|
| Sham Comparator: Control eyes<br>The control eye is treated using low energy dose energy (1J/ cm2) as sham treatment, ensuring blinding of the respective patient. | Device: Sham Treatment<br>* The fellow eye serves as the control eye. Study eye receives the standard energy dose as recommended by the manufacturer (between 8 and 12J/cm2, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations). The control eye is treated using low energy dose energy (1J/ cm2) as sham treatment, ensuring blinding of the respective patient.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Difference Meibum quality score and expressibility between both eyes during the 6-month visit |  | 6-months visit | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Comparison of dry eye related parameters between both eyes (tear film break up time, Oxford Staining) |  | 6 months | 
| Change of dry eye related parameters during the study period in the study eye (tear film break up time, Oxford Staining) |  | 6 months | 
| Change of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score during the study period |  | 6 months |