Self-help Guided by Lay Providers for Anxiety in Older Adults

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Few older adults receive treatment for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) despite a high prevalence in this population and significant associated health care costs. Although older adults generally prefer psychotherapy to medication for help with anxiety, face-to-face psychotherapy is difficult to access for many of them. Psychological guided self-help (GSH), which patients use by themselves at home under the supervision of a licensed mental health provider (e.g., psychologist), has been shown to be effective. However, the capacity of our health care system to respond adequately to the mental health needs of seniors has been questioned and cost-effective solutions are required. Because the therapist's role in GSH is limited to supporting the patient, it is conceivable that this role could be assumed by trained and supervised lay providers (LP) instead of licensed providers. If this approach is effective, it could help provide many older adults with much needed mental health treatment at a lower cost. The main objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of GSH guided by LP for GAD in older adults. Participants will be assigned randomly to an experimental group, which will receive treatment immediately, or to a control group whose treatment will be delayed. Data will be obtained through clinician evaluations and self-assessment questionnaires. They will include socio-demographic characteristics, symptoms of GAD, variables related to anxiety, such as depression and sleep difficulties, and participants' perception of treatment. For the experimental group, data collection will take place at four different times: before treatment begins, after treatment ends, and at 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment. Control group participants will be assessed on three occasions: before and after the waiting period and after receiving treatment. The efficacy of GSH will be established by comparing the change in the two groups on the main variables. We will also identify the characteristics of patients associated with improvement during treatment and document their perception of treatment.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Few older adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) receive treatment although it is one of the most prevalent anxiety disorders in this population and involves significant health care costs. Studies show that older adults generally prefer psychotherapy and find it more acceptable than medication for help with anxiety. Unfortunately, face-to-face psychotherapy is difficult to access for many of them. Guided self-help (GSH) is an alternative to psychotherapy which requires that the patient take home a standardized psychological treatment and work through it more or less independently. The role of the therapist is primarily of supportive nature and the amount of contact between the patient and therapist is minimized. There is evidence that GSH based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy (GSH-CBT) and guided by a licensed mental health provider is effective for treating GAD in older adults. However, the capacity of our health care system to respond adequately to the mental health needs of older adults has been questioned and cost-effective solutions are required to meet the needs of a rapidly aging population. Because the therapist's role in GSH-CBT is limited to supporting the patient, it is conceivable that this role could be assumed by trained and supervised lay providers (LP) instead of licensed providers. LP are generally providers with no post-graduate training in a specialized mental health program. The main goal of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of GSH-CBT guided by LP for GAD in older adults. Secondary goals are to identify the characteristics of patients associated with improvement during treatment and to document perception of treatment by patients and LP. We will conduct a multisite randomized controlled trial comparing an experimental group receiving GSH-CBT guided by LP to a wait-list control group. LP training will include readings, didactic training, and role plays. LP will be supervised throughout the project by licensed psychologists. Treatment will last 15 weeks and be based on a participant's manual. Weekly telephone sessions with LP (30 minutes maximum) will be limited to providing support. Data will be obtained through clinician evaluations and self-assessment questionnaires. They will include symptoms of GAD and variables related to anxiety, such as depression. For the experimental group, measurements will take place at pre- and post-treatment and at 6 and 12 months post-treatment. For the control group, three evaluations are planned: two pre-treatment evaluations (before and after the waiting period) and after receiving treatment (post-treatment). The efficacy of GSH-CBT will be established by comparing the change in the two groups on the main variables. This project will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a novel approach to treat GAD in older adults. If effective, it may be implemented on a larger scale and provide many older adults with much needed mental health treatment through an expanded workforce.

Official Title
-----------------
Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Older Adults : Efficacy of a Self-help Treatment Guided by Trained Lay Providers

Conditions
-----------------
Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Self-help guided by a lay provider
* Behavioral: Waiting list where participants wait for delayed treatment


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: 60 years of age or older meet at least criteria for subthreshold GAD at screening based on items of the Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire meet DSM-5 criteria for primary threshold or subthreshold GAD be able to read and speak French and to use the telephone without difficulty if an anxiety medication is used, commit to maintaining the type of medication or dose during eight weeks prior to treatment and during the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: a disabling physical disorder that is not adequately controlled (e.g., acute heart disease, recent stroke) the presence of a substance use disorder presenting a bipolar disorder or symptoms of a psychotic disorder having significant cognitive impairment (score of less than 22 on the Telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination) currently receiving or having received psychotherapy for anxiety over the last six months.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 60 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Self-help guided by a lay provider<br> | Behavioral: Self-help guided by a lay provider<br>* Self-help based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy and guided by a lay provider. Treatment lasts 15 weeks, is based on a participant's manual, and consists of relaxation, differentiation of the main types of worries, learning to tolerate uncertainty, questioning false beliefs about worries, problem solving, cognitive exposure, and planning pleasant activities. Weekly telephone sessions with the lay provider serve to provide support.<br>|
| Other: Waiting list where participants wait for delayed treatment<br> | Behavioral: Self-help guided by a lay provider<br>* Self-help based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy and guided by a lay provider. Treatment lasts 15 weeks, is based on a participant's manual, and consists of relaxation, differentiation of the main types of worries, learning to tolerate uncertainty, questioning false beliefs about worries, problem solving, cognitive exposure, and planning pleasant activities. Weekly telephone sessions with the lay provider serve to provide support.<br>Behavioral: Waiting list where participants wait for delayed treatment<br>* Participants have a 15-week wait period during which they receive a 15-minute telephone call from the local professional research assistant on three occasions separated by four-week intervals. The purpose of these calls is to encourage the participant to persevere until the start of treatment and to identify potential negative effects that could be associated with the waiting period. Participants receive self-help guided by a lay provider after the waiting period.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Penn State Worry Questionnaire | 16 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. A higher total score indicates a greater tendency to worry. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in GAD-7 | 7 items answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 3. A higher total score suggests greater severity. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Intolerance to Uncertainty Inventory | 27 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. A higher total score suggests higher intolerance to uncertainty. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire | 12 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. A higher total score suggests more negative attitudes toward problems. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire | 25 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. A higher total score suggests more likely use of cognitive avoidance. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Why Worry Questionnaire | 25 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. A higher total score suggests a greater belief that worrying is useful. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Geriatric Anxiety Inventory | 20 items rated as agree or disagree. Minimum score = 0; Maximum score = 20. A higher total score is indicative of greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Geriatric Depression Scale | 30 items rated as yes or no. Minimum score = 0; Maximum score = 30.A higher total score is indicative of greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Insomnia Severity Index | 7 items rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. A higher total score suggests more severe insomnia. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Sheehan Disability Scale | Three self-rated items of family, work, and social impairment rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in Mini-Mental State Examination, telephone version | Items on orientation to time and place, registration, attention, recall, and language. Scores vary between 0 and 26 with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 
| Change in GAD diagnosis | The Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 is a validated structured interview used to confirm the presence or absence of anxiety disorders and associated psychiatric diagnoses. | Baseline, post treatment (15 weeks), 6 months and 12 months follow-up. | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
older adult, psychological treatment, randomized controlled trial, generalized anxiety disorder