bpMRI and Risk Based Shared Clinical Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
The shortcoming of the pre-biopsy prostate MRI approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation. The trial will enrol 600 patients. The primary outcome measure is the the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline. Eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Although most of the prostate cancers (PCas) are currently being diagnosed at early stage, at present, 30% of men are diagnosed with primarily metastatic disease. The need for better diagnostic methods is, therefore, warranted. Recent studies have shown that an alternative pathway using multiparametric (mpMRI) or biparametric (bpMRI) magnetic resonance imaging as a triage test reduces unnecessary biopsies, decreases the detection of clinically non-significant PCa (non-SPCa), and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa). In addition, based on these trials, also EAU guideline was updated to recommend that all men should undergo pre-biopsy mpMRI. However, shortcoming of the approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation. The trial will enrol 600 patients from four hospital districts: Varsinais-Suomi, Satakunta, Pirkanmaa and Keski-Suomi. Key inclusion criteria are suspicion of prostate cancer based on elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Men with previous PCa diagnosis and contraindications for MRI are excluded. The primary outcome measure is the comparison of the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline. Using PSA as strata, eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. After randomisation MRI examination is performed and interpreted by one experienced uro-radiologist using Likert and PI-RADS2.1 classifications. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation. Men with negative biopsies or with no biopsies performed are all assigned for five-year follow-up with semi-annual PSA. Long-term follow-up based on health records and national registries is performed for additional 15 years for all patients.

Official Title
-----------------
Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer - A Multi-centre Trial on Clinical Utility of IMPROD bpMRI in a Shared Decision Making Setting

Conditions
-----------------
Prostate Cancer

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Diagnostic Test: A shared decision making


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age: 18 years or older Language spoken: Finnish Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, based on: serum level of PSA from 2,5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml and/or abnormal digital rectal examination according to the referral physician Mental status: Patients must be able to understand the meaning of the study Informed consent: The patient must sign the appropriate Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent documents in the presence of the designated staff Exclusion Criteria: previous diagnosis of prostate cancer any contraindications for MRI any other conditions that might compromise patient's safety, based on the clinical judgment of the responsible urologist bilateral hip prosthesis

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Male

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| No Intervention: Control<br>After IMPROD bpMRI all men undergo prostate biopsies. In men with Likert scores of 1-2, TRUS guided systematic biopsies are performed. In men with Likert 3-5 score, in addition to systematic biopsies, two targeted biopsies are taken from each lesion (up to two lesions). | |
| Experimental: Intervention<br>After IMPROD bpMRI prostate biopsies are performed according to shared decision-making by the treating urologist and the patient. If biopsies are to be performed, in men with IMPROD bpMRI likert scores of 1-2, 12-core systematic TRUS guided biopsies are performed and in men with Likert 3-5 score lesions systematic biopsies are performed and two targeted biopsies are taken from each lesion (up to two lesions). If biopsies are not performed, men are referred for a PSA follow-up. | Diagnostic Test: A shared decision making<br>* Based on prostate cancer risk calculation (age, usage of 5-ARI medication, baseline PSA, IMPROD bpMRI Likert, prostate volume) a shared decision making whether to perform prostate biopsies or not<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Gleason 4+3=7 prostate cancer, baseline | The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [ISUP grade group, the GGG, 3]) prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway | baseline | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Gleason 3+4=7 or lower prostate cancer, baseline | The proportion of men with clinically non-significant prostate cancer and intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3 [GGG 1], and Gleason 3+4 [GGG 2]) and benign biopsies in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway | baseline | 
| Men undergoing biopsies | The proportion of men undergoing biopsies in the control and intervention arms | baseline | 
| Biopsy related complications | The proportion of men having biopsy-related complications in the control and intervention arms | baseline | 
| Gleason 4+3=7 prostate cancer, follow-up | The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [GGG 3], prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms during the five years of follow-up | during the five years of follow-up | 
| the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer -questionnaire (MAX-PC) | Total score in MAX-PC in the control and intervention arms. Score range: 0-54. Higher scores in MAX-PC denote higher anxiety. | baseline, 6months, 12months | 
| Biopsy probability | The probability of performing biopsy in experimental arm | baseline | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
bpMRI, shared decision making, IMPROD, risk calculation