Effect of Different Length of Time for Trainees to Attempt Cannulation on Success Rate of Selective Cannulation During hands-on ERCP Training

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most difficult techniques in the field of GI endoscopy. It is necessary for trainees to spend enough time and perform enough cases to grasp this technique. The methods of ERCP training include hands-on teaching, training on different kinds of simulators, training on ex-vivo or live anesthetized porcine stomach models, etc. Supervised hands-on teaching is the standard method for ERCP training. Selective cannulation is considered the most difficult and challenging part of learning ERCP. There is not an optimal time for trainees to attempt cannulation during hands-on ERCP training. The time used for attempting cannulation by trainees was 5min or 10min in several centers. In ERCP center of the investigators hospital, 15min was used for trainees to attempt cannulation for about one year. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the major complication related to cannulation, was 4.0%, which was comparable with previous studies. The investigators hypothesized that a longer time (15min) for trainees to attempt cannulation would increase success rate of selective cannulation and help to improve skills more quickly. At the meantime, with actively verbal or hands-on assistance from the instructor during performance of trainees, the risk of complications would not increased with a longer time to attempt cannulation. Here a prospective, endoscopists-blinded, randomized, controlled study was designed to evaluate the effects of different periods of time for trainees to attempt selective cannulation on success rate of cannulation, self-satisfaction of performance and post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Official Title
-----------------
Effect of Different Length of Time for Trainees to Attempt Cannulation on Success Rate of Selective Cannulation During hands-on ERCP Training

Conditions
-----------------
Disease as Reason for ERCP

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: Hands-on ERCP training.


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-90 years old; Without prior EST. Exclusion Criteria: History of partial or total gastrectomy (Billroth I/II, Roux-en-Y); Duodenal stricture (benign or malignant); Ampullary carcinoma; Previously failed selective cannulation; Chronic pancreatitis with PD stone; Minor papilla cannulation; Papilla fistula; Severe diseases of heart, lung, brain and kidney; Hemodynamical unstability; Pregnant women; Refusal or unable to give written informed consent.

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 90 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: 5 minutes group<br>The time limit of attempt selective cannulation by trainees is limited to 5 minutes. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within 5 minutes, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. | Procedure: Hands-on ERCP training.<br>* The standard cannulation technique was used with a sphincterotome preloaded with a guidewire, positioned in the ampullary orifice, and targeting the presumed entry of common bile duct (CBD) or pancreatic duct (PD). During the whole procedure of cannulation by trainees, the senior endoscopist would actively communicate with trainees through verbal and/or hands-on assistance to help them to make the performance more correctly. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within the designated length of time, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. The whole procedure of cannulation was recorded by video. Rectal indomethacin and/or pancreatic stent was used in high-risky patients.<br>|
| Experimental: 10 minutes group<br>The time limit of attempt selective cannulation by trainees is limited to 10 minutes. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within 10 minutes, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. | Procedure: Hands-on ERCP training.<br>* The standard cannulation technique was used with a sphincterotome preloaded with a guidewire, positioned in the ampullary orifice, and targeting the presumed entry of common bile duct (CBD) or pancreatic duct (PD). During the whole procedure of cannulation by trainees, the senior endoscopist would actively communicate with trainees through verbal and/or hands-on assistance to help them to make the performance more correctly. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within the designated length of time, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. The whole procedure of cannulation was recorded by video. Rectal indomethacin and/or pancreatic stent was used in high-risky patients.<br>|
| Experimental: 15 minutes group<br>The time limit of attempt selective cannulation by trainees is limited to 15 minutes. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within 15 minutes, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. | Procedure: Hands-on ERCP training.<br>* The standard cannulation technique was used with a sphincterotome preloaded with a guidewire, positioned in the ampullary orifice, and targeting the presumed entry of common bile duct (CBD) or pancreatic duct (PD). During the whole procedure of cannulation by trainees, the senior endoscopist would actively communicate with trainees through verbal and/or hands-on assistance to help them to make the performance more correctly. If the trainees failed to enter the targeted duct within the designated length of time, the senior endoscopist would take over the duodenoscope and continue the following procedure of cannulation. The whole procedure of cannulation was recorded by video. Rectal indomethacin and/or pancreatic stent was used in high-risky patients.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Success rate of selective cannulation by trainee | The rate of successful selective cannulation by trainee in one year. | up to one year | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Complication rate | Post-ERCP pancreatitis (mild, moderate-to-severe); Abdominal pain (mild, moderate, severe); Hyperamylasemia; Vomiting (mild, moderate, severe); Cholangitis (mild, moderate, severe); Perforation (conservative therapy, surgery）; Bleeding (mild, moderate, severe); | up to one year | 
| Performance score of selective cannulation by trainees | How much will you score on your performance of cannulation? ----for trainee: 0-terrible, 10-perfect; How much will you score on the performance of cannulation by trainee? --for instructor: 0-terrible, 10-perfect. | up to one year | 
| Difficulty score of cannulation | How much will you score on the difficulty of the cannulation? -----for trainee: 0-very easy, 10-very difficult; How much will you score on the difficulty of the cannulation? -----for instructor: 0-very easy, 10-very difficult. | up to one year | 
| Final success rate of cannulation |  | up to one year | 
| Total time of successful cannulation |  | up to one year | 
| Rate of Needle-knife precut sphincterotomy |  | up to one year |