Motivational Interviewing in Women's Pelvic Wellness Education

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
This pilot study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of an educational workshop on pelvic floor disorders and its potential impact on decisional conflict.

Detailed Description
-----------------
Pelvic floor disorders can significantly affect a woman's quality of life, yet many feel uncomfortable openly discussing these topics. Treatments include lifestyle modification, medications, and/or surgery. Decisional conflict arises when patients have difficulty choosing between several viable treatment options. Factors contributing to decisional conflict include biased information, poor peer support, and unaddressed fears. Effective counselling may help address these factors. There are few studies on how decision coaching can help women with prolapse and incontinence reach a satisfactory decision about treatment. This study aims to use the principals of shared decision making to address decisional conflict surrounding treatment for pelvic floor disorders. Specifically, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of small group workshops on pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence led by a nurse continence advisor and a psychologist (decision coach). Results of this study will inform future development of interdisciplinary, patient-centered approaches to enhanced decision making in women's health.

Official Title
-----------------
2015 Motivational Interviewing in Women's Pelvic Wellness Education Project

Conditions
-----------------
Pelvic Floor Disorders, Urinary Incontinence (UI), Pelvic Prolapse Conditions

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Behavioral: Workshop


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: Women ages >18 years old Urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse First visit with urogynecologist Exclusion Criteria: Anal incontinence Previous pelvic radiation therapy Requirement for a Substitute Decision Maker Inability to attend the workshop Unwilling to attend an English-language workshop Unwilling to complete English-language surveys

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
No

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| No Intervention: Standard of care<br>Standard of care | |
| Experimental: Workshop<br>90 minute workshop on either Urinary Incontinence (UI) or Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) | Behavioral: Workshop<br>* The first 15 minutes will be an information session on either Urinary Incontinence (UI) or Pelvic Organ Prolapse (PO) led by a Nurse Continence Advisor. The following 60 minutes will comprise a psychologist-led group discussion. The structured discussion will encourage participants to share experiences, thoughts, and feelings on pelvic floor disorders. Resistances and barriers to seeking treatment will be discussed. Decision-making processes will be explored. During the final 15 minutes, participants will be asked to complete a survey to evaluate the workshop. The survey will assess satisfaction with the information provided, quality of group discussion, comfort level with the group experience, and their satisfaction with the roles of the nurse continence advisor and psychologist.<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change in Decisional Conflict between baseline and followup, as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor 1995). | The decisional conflict scale (DCS) is a validated scale that measures (a) perceived uncertainty between options, (b) factors contributing to uncertainty (feeling uninformed, unclear about values, unsupported in decision making), and (c) factors contributing to effective decision making (feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented, and satisfaction with the decision). 13 A total decisional conflict score from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict) is given, as well as five sub-scores for each factor listed above. | The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), will be administered to participants in the control and intervention groups at baseline and first follow up visit, approx. 3 months later. | 

Secondary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Participant satisfaction with the workshop. | Non-validated questionnaire addressing participants' perceived satisfaction with the following aspects of the workshop: group discussion, the information session, and the workshop as a whole. In addition there are four free text questions: 1) What changes will you make in your decision for treatment as a result of this workshop?; 2)Tell us about one thing you found most valuable in this workshop; 3)What would you change about this workshop?; 4) Other comments | This will be measured using a survey administered to participants immediately following the workshop | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
decisional aid, workshops, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor dysfunction, decisional conflict