Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Detailed Description
-----------------
Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects. Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Official Title
-----------------
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Procedure Using VISTA Technique Compared to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in Conjunction With Platelet Rich Fibrin-membrane.

Conditions
-----------------
Gingival Recession

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: VISTA Technique
* Procedure: modified coronally advanced flap


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: - Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm Exclusion Criteria: Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 55 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: Vista technique<br>The vista technique with PRF membrane uses a Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access in combination with Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects. | Procedure: VISTA Technique<br>* VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane<br>* Other names: Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access;|
| Active Comparator: modified coronally advanced flap<br>A modified coronally advanced flap utilising Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects. | Procedure: modified coronally advanced flap<br>* modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II<br>* Other names: MCAF;|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Patient satisfaction | Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes. it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients; did you feel pain in spite of the medication prescribed? did you perceive the course of healing unexpected restriction? did you experience any remaining symptoms of parasethesia? would you described the under taken effort as reasonable? have your expectations been fulfilled? | after 6 months |