Applicability Clinic of Cement Portland Structural White in Endodontic Surgery

Study Overview
=================
Brief Summary
-----------------
Thirty teeth twelve patients, two female and a male, who had persistent periradicular lesions were selected to participate in this study. The lesions were diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT; Model i-Cat 17-19, Imaging Sciences International LLC).In patients with two teeth to be treated, a tooth was retroobturado with PBEA cement, (experiment) and another tooth was retroobturado with MTA cement (control). There was significance for the two cements on the repair of wounds. Key words: Apicoectomy; Oral Surgery; Biocompatible Materials; Dental Cements; Translational Medical Research

Detailed Description
-----------------
Objective: to evaluate the clinical applicability of structural Portland white cement additive in retrofilling surgeries. Method: persistent apical periodontitis 30 teeth of 12 patients were diagnosed by computed tomography CT, cone beam. Each of them had from two to four compromised teeth. The endodontic surgery were performed and the teeth were retrofilling Each patient had a retrofilling tooth with cement mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) control and other tooth with white Portland cement structural additive (PBEA) experiment. When the patient presented four teeth with injury, two were retrofilling with MTA and two Portland cement with structural white cement additive. Six months after surgery, there were new scans to evaluate the repair or not the wounds.

Official Title
-----------------
Applicability Clinic of Cement Portland Structural White in Endodontic Surgery

Conditions
-----------------
Mandibular Hypoplasia

Intervention / Treatment
-----------------
* Procedure: ENDODONTIC SURGERY


Participation Criteria
=================
Eligibility Criteria
-----------------
Inclusion Criteria: patients were diagnosed by computed tomography CT, cone beam each of them had from two to four compromised teeth Exclusion Criteria: patients who did not return for review after six months

Ages Eligible for Study
-----------------
Minimum Age: 18 Years
Maximum Age: 60 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study
-----------------
All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers
-----------------
Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Study Plan
=================
How is the study designed?
-----------------

Design Details

Primary Purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single


Arms and Interventions

| Participant Group/Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
| --- | --- |
| Experimental: TOOTH ENDODONTIC SURGERY - PBEA<br>Endodontic surgery 15 teeth - PBEA | Procedure: ENDODONTIC SURGERY<br>* ENDODONTIC SURGERY<br>|
| Experimental: TOOTH ENDODONTIC SURGERY -MTA<br>Endodontic surgery 15 teeth - MTA | Procedure: ENDODONTIC SURGERY<br>* ENDODONTIC SURGERY<br>|

What is the study measuring?
-----------------
Primary Outcome Measures

| Outcome Measure | Measure Description | Time Frame |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Regeneration measured by tomographers endodontic surgery | Six months after surgery, there were new scans to evaluate the repair or not the wounds. | Six months after surgery | 

 Terms related to the study
=================
Keywords Provided by Centre Hospitalier Valida
-----------------
Apicoectomy, Oral surgery, Biocompatible materials, Dental Cements, Translational Medical Research